MBE 2010 

Portal Track 

Guideline for Participants 

7 April 2010 
Table of Content 

1 Introduction .......................................................................................................1 

2 MBE 2010 Portal Track Test Environment ...................................................1 

2.1 Computers Configuration ................................................................................................. 1 

2.2 Operating Systems............................................................................................................ 2 

2.3 Directory Structure of Application................................................................................... 2 

3 Creating Executables ........................................................................................4 

3.1 1-1 versus 1-Many Executables........................................................................................ 4 

3.2 Robustness to Image Quality ............................................................................................ 5 

3.3 Executable Naming Convention ....................................................................................... 5 

3.4 Executable Calling Signatures & Arguments ................................................................... 7 

3.5 Packaging & Installing Your Application........................................................................ 9 

4 MBE File Formats...........................................................................................10 

4.1 Parameter Files ............................................................................................................... 10 

4.2 Log Files......................................................................................................................... 12 

4.3 Signature Sets (Sigsets) .................................................................................................. 13 

4.4 Similarity Matrices ......................................................................................................... 16 

4.5 Imagery ........................................................................................................................... 18 

5 FAQs.................................................................................................................19 
1 Introduction 

This document specifies the rules and guidelines for executables that are submitted to the MBE 

2010 Portal Track. There will be four main experiments in the MBE 2010 Portal Track: Face, 

Face NIR, Iris, and Fusion. The Face experiment will match face still images against high 

definition (HD) video sequences. Face NIR will match face still images against near infrared 

(NIR) video sequences. Iris will match iris still images against iris still images and iris still 

images against NIR video sequences. Fusion will match face and iris still images against HD 

and NIR video sequences. All experiments will allow for performance to be measured in 1-1 and 

1-many matching. All executable submissions must be capable of 1-1 matching, 1-many 

matching is optional. All executable submissions will also have the option to include a quality 

measure in the algorithm. 

Section 2 discusses the MBE 2010 Portal Track test environment. MBE 2010 Portal Track 

participants must ensure that their applications are compliant with these requirements. 

Instructions for creating executables, including naming convention, calling signatures and 

arguments, and packing applications, are described in Section 3. Format specifications for MBE 

2010 Portal Track files, such as parameters files, signature set (Sigset) and similarity matrices, 

are described in Section 4. Section 5, answers Frequently Asked Questions. Topics not covered 

in this document should be directed to the MBE 2010 Liaison. 

2 MBE 2010 Portal Track Test Environment 

2.1 Computers Configuration 

The intended hardware for the MBE 2010 Portal Track is Intel-based servers. All submitted 

executables will be transferred to the MBE 2010 Portal Track servers and executed using the 

directory structures and protocol described below. The MBE 2010 Portal Track computing 

environment puts the following requirements on your executable: 

• A separate executable must be submitted for each experiment type. 

• Executables must be able to be installed multiple times on (potentially) multiple servers. 

1 
• Executables must run on a stand-alone machine that does not have internet access during the 

MBE 2010 Portal Track evaluations. Please ensure that your executables can be installed and 

executed without access to the internet. 

• All libraries (static or dynamic) used for the executable must be included in the application 

package. DO NOT ASSUME THAT ANY STATIC OR DYNAMIC LIBRARIES EXIST 

ON THE MBE 2010 PORTAL TRACK SYSTEMS. It is recommended that you verify that 

you are not using any non-standard libraries by wiping a system clean (i.e. reformatting the 

disk drive), reinstalling the operating system and then verifying that your executable runs 

with no additional libraries. 

2.2 Operating Systems 

The MBE 2010 Portal Track servers will have either the Windows XP Professional or the Linux 

operating system (OS). Both OS will be 32-bit variant. The targeted versions of the operating 

systems are Windows XP Professional with Service Pack 3 and Fedora 12. 

2.3 Directory Structure of Application 

Each MBE 2010 Portal Track participant must utilize the directory structure shown in Figure 1. 

This directory structure will be repeated for each installation of the executable. It is important 

that participants make no assumptions as to the disk drive or parent directory that this directory 

structure is installed in. Thus, participants should not assume that the top-level directory is on the 

C:\ drive or in /home/. 

The name of the top level directory must correspond to the name of the executable as specified in 

Section 3.1. All other directories will be below the top level directory. MBE 2010 Portal Track 

participants will not have access privileges to any directory outside of this directory hierarchy. 

For example, participants will NOT be able to write temporary files to C:\temp, /tmp/ or 

/usr/tmp. 

• Executables must be installed to the executable_name/bin/ directory. 

• All experiments (and thus executables) will be instantiated from the top level 

(executable_name/) directory. Thus, a typical calling syntax will be of the following form: 

bin/executable_name <argument_list> 

2 
• All scripts, data, etc. that an executable needs should be stored in the executable_name/bin/ 

directory structure. 

• All libraries needed by executables should be installed in either the executable_name/bin/ or 

the executable_name/lib/ directory. 

• After installation, both the executable_name/bin/ and the executable_name/lib/ directories 

will be made read and execute only. If a subdirectory structure is needed, then it should be 

created by the installation process. After the executable installation process is complete, the 

executable_name/bin/ and executable_name/lib/ directory structures cannot be modified. 

• All required outputs (i.e. similarity matrices) generated during experiment execution will be 

written to the executable_name/output directory that is specified in the executable calling 

signature. Typically, this will be the executable_name/output/ directory. However, 

participants should not hardcode the name of the output directory rather they should write 

their output to the file specified in the calling signature. Note, output files names may be 

specified as either absolution filenames (e.g. c:/MBE/MyExecutable/output/sim_matrix.mtx) 

or relative filenames (e.g. output/sim_matrix.mtx). Regardless of how it is specified, users 

will be given write permission to the executable_name/output/ and/or appropriate directory. 

• Partial and/or temporary results can be stored in the executable_name/temp/ directory. Users 

will be will be given both read and write privileges to the executable_name//temp/ directory 

given. It is also permissible for them to create and populate other subdirectories within the 

top-level executable_name/temp/ directory. At the completion of an experimental run, the 

contents of the executable_name/temp/ directory structure maybe erased at the MBE 2010 

evaluation team’s discretion. Alternatively, the team may decide to reuse biometric samples 

during a sequence of experimental runs. To expedite processing, templates should be stored 

in the executable_name/temp/ directory structure and reused where applicable. However, the 

code should be designed to handle cases were the templates are erased prior to the 

experiment. Partial results can also be stored in the executable_name/temp/ directory. It is 

important to note that files output to the temporary directory may be deleted prior to 

subsequent runs of experiments. 

3 
• Images will be stored outside of the directory structure shown in Figure 1. Users will be 

given either the absolute or the relative path to the images via the image_directory parameter 

(see Section 0). 

bin/ lib/ temp/ output/ 

executable_name/ 

Figure 1 MBE 2010 Portal Track Directory Structure 

3 Creating Executables 

3.1 1-1 versus 1-Many Executables 

MBE 2010 Portal Track will evaluate both 1-1 and 1-many executables. 1-1 (or verification) 

executables must produce the same score when comparing sample i to sample j independent of 

the size and/or composition of the target and query sets. 1-many (or identification) algorithms 

can normalize scores based on the composition of the target set. For 1-many tests, we will ensure 

that each signature (subject) is only in the target set at most one time. 

MBE 2010 Portal Track will enforce a set of independence requirements for 1-1 submittals. 

These requirements ensure that submitted 1-1 executables produce the same scores in batch 

mode that they produce when executed in a one-to-one mode. To this end, a set of validation 

tests will be used to confirm the independence of each 1-1 executable. Each submitted 1-1 

executable must pass these tests to confirm that it satisfies the independence requirements. 

1-1 executables are required for all submittals. 1-many executables are optional. If a MBE 2010 

Portal Track participant only submits a (validated) 1-1 executable, the executable will be used 

4 
for both 1-1 and 1-many experiments. However, 1-many executables cannot be used for 1-1 

experiments. 

Please review the naming convention in the next section to properly denote the intended 

matching type of your submittal. 

3.2 Robustness to Image Quality 

Submitted executables must be able to process biometric samples (still images and video 

sequences) of varying quality without failure. More specifically, all executables must create a 

similarity score for all specified comparisons – even if the executable fails to create a template 

for the biometric sample. Incomplete similarity matrices will cause inaccurate accuracy scores to 

be calculated during the evaluation. It is recommended that a descriptive message be written to 

the log file when an executable has problems with a biometric sample. 

3.3 Executable Naming Convention 

This section specifies the naming conventions for MBE 2010 Portal Track submittals. The name 

of all MBE 2010 Portal Track executables are consistent in that they consist of a base name, 

followed by an underscore, followed by the experiment name, followed by an underscore, 

followed by the matching type, followed by an underscore, followed by the algorithm version. 

The typical naming syntax is: 

basename_experimentType_matchingType_algorithmVersion 

For example: 

NIST_Face_1-N_1 

Substrings Allowed Values Comment 

basename (to be emailed) Unique name given to each participant via an email at registration. 

experimentType Face 

FaceNIR 

Iris 

Fusion 

Face: Face Visible Still to Visible Video 

FaceNIR: Face Visible Still to NIR Video 

Sequence 

Iris: Iris NIR Still to NIR Video Sequence 

Fusion: Face Visible Still + Iris NIR Still to 

5 
Substrings Allowed Values Comment 

Visible Video + NIR Video Sequence 

matchingType 1-1 

1-N 

1 to 1 (verification) or 

1 to Many (identification) 

algorithmVersion 1 or 2 The first submittal of an algorithm should be 

labeled 1 the second 2 (if applicable). 

Table 1 Executable Naming Convention 

• The base name, experiment name, matching type and the algorithm version are separated by 

underscores. 

• Base names will be unique to each participant. Participants will receive an e-mail from the 

MBE 2010 Liaison that specifies the base name that they should use with all of their 

executables and corresponding top-level directories. 

• The experiment type corresponds to the modalities to which the algorithm is applicable. The 

MBE 2010 Portal Track will consist of four experiment types. Visible face still images 

compared to visible video will be denoted “Face”. Visible face still images compared to NIR 

video sequences will be denoted “FaceNIR”. Iris NIR stills compared to NIR video 

sequences will be denoted “Iris”. The final experiment type considered the fusion of visible 

face still images and iris NIR stills compared to visible video paired with NIR video 

sequences. This experiment type is denoted “Fusion”. 

• The “Iris” experiment will include cross –sensor performance evaluations. Iris images will be 

acquired by a LG2200, a LG4000, and Iris on the Move (IoM) sensors. Here, iris NIR still 

images taken from the LG2200 will be compared to images from the LG4000 sensor. 

• Participants can submit up to two executables representing different algorithms for a given 

experiment type/matching type combination. If a second executable is submitted, then an 

explanation should be provided that explains the differences between the executables (e.g. 

submittal 1 is optimized for high-resolution images while submittal 2 is optimized for low 

resolution/quality images). The version of multiple algorithms must be indicated in the 

executable name as described above. Please note that we recommend that participants label 

the algorithm version of their primary submittal as “_1”. 

3.3.1 1-1 Matching Executables 

6 
 

 

Experiment Executable Name 

Face 

Face NIR 

Iris 

Fusion 

basename_Face_1-1_algorithmVersion 

basename_FaceNIR_1-1_algorithmVersion 

basename_Iris_1-1_algorithmVersion 

basename_Fusion_1-1_algorithmVersion 

3.3.2 1-many Matching Executables 

Experiment Executable Name 

Face 

Face NIR 

Iris 

Fusion 

basename_Face_1-many_algorithmVersion 

basename_FaceNIR_1-many_algorithmVersion 

basename_Iris_1-many_algorithmVersion 

basename_Fusion_1-many_algorithmVersion 

3.4 Executable Calling Signatures & Arguments 

3.4.1 Calling Signatures 

All MBE 2010 Portal Track executables will be called from the command line. The calling 

signature for MBE 2010 Portal Track executables is: 

executableName parameter_file image_directory target_sigset query_sigset similarity_file 

3.4.2 Arguments 

Table 2 describes the arguments used above in the calling signatures for the executables. It is 

important to note that all filenames will be relative to the working directory from which the 

program is instantiated. 

7 
Parameter name Type Format Description 

parameter_file Input XML An XML document that specifies experiment 

description information, configuration 

parameters and the name of metadata files. 

image_directory Input string The relative path to the image (data) directory 

target_sigset Input/ 

Output 

Sigset The name of the target signature set. This 

document will contain a list of the target 

images. Quality scores for the target signatures 

can be written to a copy of this sigset in the 

output directory. 

query_sigset Input/ 

Output 

Sigset The name of the target signature set. This 

document will contain a list of the query 

images. Quality scores for the query signatures 

can be written to a copy of this sigset in the 

output directory. 

similarity_file Input/ 

Output 

Similarity 

Matrix 

The name of the similarity file. This will be 

the primary output data structure. 

Table 2 Descriptions of Executable Arguments 

Remarks 

• A file name may be specified with either an absolution path (e.g. 

C:\MBE\MyExecutable\output\similarity.mtx) or a relative path (e.g. output\similarity.mtx) 

from the current directory. 

• Filenames and directory names will not contain whitespace characters. We will use an 

underscore or an uppercase letter to separate words in filenames. 

• For algorithms that create quality information (scores), users can create a copy of the 

target_sigset and the query_sigset in the output/ directory. 

3.4.3 Image Directory 

The image directory is a string that specifies the absolute or relative path to the directory that 

contains images. This string should be appended to each of the data files listed in the signature 

sets. For examples, if the parameter image_directory is ‘..\images\’ and the sigset refers to an 

image named ‘2D_Visible\0023d1.mpg’, you should process the image in the file 

‘..\images\2D_Visible\0023d1.jpg’. Please note that the value of the image_directory argument 

will be consistent with the underlying operating system. Thus, ‘..\images\’ and ‘../images/’ would 

be provided for Windows and Linux operating system respectively. 

8 
3.5 Packaging & Installing Your Application 

Executables can be submitted on a CD, DVD or USB stick. Executables should be packaged to 

ensure that the MBE 2010 evaluation team can easily and correctly install your submittal on the 

MBE 2010 Portal Track test systems. Two types of installation processes are acceptable. Your 

submittal must have either an installation program that performs all files extractions and 

configurations or your submittal must be installable via direct copy of the content of your disk 

(CD, DVD, or USB) to the corresponding directory on the target platforms. In the latter case, 

installation should not require any additional configuration steps. In any event, the MBE 2010 

evaluation team will ensure that the directories have the appropriate access privileges as detailed 

in Section 2.3. 

3.5.1 Installation Utility Method 

You must provide an installation program (or script) if setup and configuration of your 

submittals requires steps other than simple copying of files and setting of directory permissions. 

In this case, each executable must have its own installation program (or script). The top level 

directories on the disk (CD, DVD, or USB) must correspond to the names of the executables as 

specified in Section 3.1 of this document. Inside of each top level directory, there should be a 

clearly named install executable file (e.g. install.bat, install.exe, install.sh, etc). Your install 

program must be executable directly from your disk (CD, DVD, or USB) (i.e. the install program 

copies all necessary files to a user supplied directory) or it must be executed after the entire 

content of the disk (CD, DVD, or USB) is copied to the target system. There should be a 

readme.txt file in each directory that specifies whether the install program should be run directly 

from the disk (CD, DVD, or USB) or whether the files should be copied to the home directory 

prior to running the install program. Upon execution, this install file should copy all necessary 

files (executables, libraries, parameter files) to the appropriate directory on the target platform. 

The install file should also perform any necessary configuration. Other than execution of the 

install file and setting of directory permissions, no additional setup steps should be necessary to 

run the executables on the target system. 

9 
3.5.2 Copy Directory Method 

In this method, participants must place all files necessary to execute their submittals in a 

directory structure that mimics the directory structure specified in Section 2.3. Specifically, the 

top level directories on the disk (CD, DVD, or USB) must correspond to the names of the 

executables as specified in Section 3.1 of this document. There should be a bin/ directory and a 

lib/ directory directly beneath each top level directory. The content of the bin/ and lib/ directories 

will be copied to the corresponding directory on the target platform. No additional setup (other 

than setting of directory permissions) should be necessary to run the executables on the target 

system. There should also be a readme.txt in each directory that describes the contents of the 

directory. 

4 MBE File Formats 

All MBE 2010 Portal Track submittals will be required to process several standard file formats. 

The use of standard formats is necessary to enable systematic test and evaluation of the 

executables on a common set of images using validated test protocols. 

4.1 Parameter Files 

4.1.1 Overview 

Parameter files are XML documents that provide experiment description information and 

configuration values for executables. To simplify their processing, configuration values will 

always be specified via the values of attributes in the parameter file. 

4.1.2 Structure 

While the precise content of the Parameter files has not been determined, the structure will be 

similar to the example shown below in Figure 2. In this example, elements are depicted blue 

(capitalized), attributes are red (lowercase) and attribute values are black (uppercase and in 

quotes). The Experiment element is the outer element. It has one attribute named type with value 

“1-many”. The Experiment element has three child elements Target, Query and LogFile. Both 

the Target and Query elements have four attributes: spectrum, pose, min_recordings and 

max_recordings. The LogFile element have on attribute named name. 

10 
 

<?xml version="1.0"?> 

<Experiment name="Face" type="1-many" > 

<Target spectrum="Visible" min_recordings="1" max_recordings="1" pose="Varied" />

 <Query spectrum="NIR" min_recordings="1" max_recordings="1" pose="Varied" />

 <LogFile name="1_to_many_logfile.txt" /> 

</Experiment> 

Figure 2 Example of a Parameter File 

The parameters and their allowed values are described below in Table 3. 

Attribute Type Allowed 

Values 

Comments 

name (Experiment) String The text of this string provides a name for 

the experiment. This attribute is not needed 

by users. 

type String 1-1 

1-many 

The value of this attribute specifies whether 

the algorithm should perform 1-1 

(verification) of 1-many (identification) 

matching. Identification algorithms can 

optionally use score normalization. Note: 

1-1 algorithms can be used on both 1-1 and 

1-many experiments while 1-many 

algorithms can only be used on 1-many 

experiments. 

spectrum enumerated Visible 

NIR 

The enumerated values of this attribute 

specify the electromagnetic spectrum of the 

images. 

capture enumerated Controlled 

Uncontrolled 

The enumerated values of this attribute 

specify whether the images were captured 

under controlled or uncontrolled 

conditions. 

min_recordings integer >0 This integer specifies the minimum number 

of images that will be associated with a 

signature. This value will be 1 for all 

experiments in the portal track since all 

signatures will have precisely one image. 

max_recordings integer >0 This integer specifies the maximum 

number of images that will be associated 

with a signature. This value will be 1 for all 

experiments in the portal track since all 

signatures will have precisely one image. 

11 
Attribute Type Allowed 

Values 

Comments 

pose string Frontal 

Nonfrontal 

Varied 

Pose variation of the biometric signatures 

in the sig-set. 

name (LogFile) string Filename All logging information generated by the 

program should be written to a file with 

this name in the output directory. 

Table 3 Description of Elements a Parameter File 

Please note that not all parameters will be provided for a given experiment. 

4.1.3 Parsing 

Due to their simple structure, Parameter files are readily parsed with any XML or XPath parser. 

Source implementation of C++ and Java classes for parsing Parameter files are provided in the 

BEE (Biometric Experimentation Environment) distribution. These classes, which use the XPath 

parser, are available to MBE 2010 Portal Track participants. Parsers written in other languages 

(e.g. C#) will not be made available. However, users should be able to easily create parsers in 

other languages using the C++ classes as a guide. 

4.1.4 Writing 

MBE 2010 Portal Track participants will not be required to write (output) Parameter files. 

4.2 Log Files 

Each executable should produce a log file. The name (and directory) for the log file will be 

provided in the parameter file via the name attribute of the LogFile element. The log file should 

provide sufficient information so that the MBE 2010 evaluation team (with limited support from 

the submitter) can easily and quickly troubleshoot submitted executables. Please note that the 

MBE 2010 evaluation team we will have limited time to troubleshoot individual submittals 

because of the large number of submittals and scheduling. This is it important that each submittal 

provide detailed debug information in the log file. For example, consider the case where the 

algorithm is unable to find the image specified in the signature set. A useful log entry will 

specify both the error type and the full name of the image ( i.e. “*** Error – unable to open 

..\MBE\images\IR-video\00056d123.ts ***” ). 

12 
4.3 Signature Sets (Sigsets) 

4.3.1 Overview 

Signature Sets (Sigsets) are the primary input structure for the MBE 2010 Portal Track. They 

will be used to specify the files in the Target and/or Query sets. 

4.3.2 Structure 

The Signature Set document will provide a list of images. XML will be used because its 

hierarchical structure facilitates a flexible representation of the relationships between subjects, 

sessions, sensors and files. Specifically, the Signature Set will consist of a list of Signature 

(subjects) element. Each Signature element will contain one or more Presentation child elements 

that correspond to capture sessions. Each Presentation element will contain one or more 

Component elements that correspond to a sensor. Lastly, each Component will have one or more 

Data elements that correspond to a file. 

Figure 3 and Figure 4 illustrate the general Signature Set structure and the simple Signature Set 

structure, respectively, with elements depicted blue, attributes depicted red (lowercase) and 

attribute values depicted black (uppercase and in quotes). 

The first example in Figure 3 has three biometric-signature elements and represents three 

subjects. The signatures are named “S5288”, “S5156”, and “S5304”. Each signature has one 

presentation, and each presentation has four attributes: name, modality, file-name, and file-format. 

For instance, the signature “S5288” has a presentation labeled “S5288”, same as the signature 

name. And the presentation consists of a visible video sample stored in the MPEG-TS file 

“vf/5288d1.ts”. 

13 
 

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> 

<biometric-signature-set xmlns="http://www.bee-biometrics.org/schemas/sigset/0.1" 

 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" 

 xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.bee-biometrics.org/schemas/sigset/0.1 

 http://www.bee-biometrics.org/schemas/sigset/0.1/simple.xsd"> 

<biometric-signature name="S5288" > 

<presentation name="S5288" modality="Face" file-name="vf/5288d1.ts" file-format="MPEG-TS" /> 

</biometric-signature> 

<biometric-signature name ="S5156" > 

<presentation name ="S5156" modality="Face" file-name="vf/5156d3.ts" file-format="MPEG-TS"/> 

</biometric-signature> 

<biometric-signature name ="S5304" > 

<presentation name ="S5304" modality="Face" file-name="vf/5304d7.ts" file-format="MPEG-TS"/> 

</biometric-signature> 

</biometric-signature-set> 

Figure 3 Example of a Simple Signature Set 

The second example in Figure 4 has two complex-biometric-signature elements and thus 

represents two subjects. The complex-biometric-signatures are named “nd1S04327” and 

“nd1S04385”. Both complex-biometric-signatures consist of a single complex-presentation that 

represents a single visit (session) of the subject. The complex-presentations have the same label 

as the parent complex-biometric-signature. (Note: While complex-presentations grouped 

under a single complex-biometric-signature are guaranteed to correspond to the same subject, 

separate complex-biometric-signatures can also correspond to the same subject.) Both 

complex-presentations have two presentation-components (separate sensors). The 

presentation-components are labeled "Face_HD" and "Face_NIR". The presentationcomponents consists of a single HD face video sample stored in the MPEG-TS file format and a 

NIR face video stored in the AVI file format. The files in complex-presentation 

"nd1S04327"are named "FaceVisibleVideo/04327v1134.ts" and "FaceNIRVideo/04327v1133.avi" 

respectively. 

14 
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> 

<biometric-signature-set xmlns="http://www.bee-biometrics.org/schemas/sigset/0.1" 

 xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" 

 xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.bee-biometrics.org/schemas/sigset/0.1 

 http://www.bee-biometrics.org/schemas/sigset/0.1/general.xsd"> 

 <complex-biometric-signature name="nd1S04327" > 

 <complex-presentation name="nd1S04327" modality="Face" > 

 <presentation-component name="Face_HD" > 

 <data file-name="FaceVisibleVideo/04327v1134.ts" file-format="MPEG2-TS" /> 

 </presentation-component>

 </complex-presentation> 

 <complex-presentation name="nd1S04327" modality="Face_NIR" > 

 <presentation-component name="Face_NIR" > 

 <data file-name="FaceNIRVideo/04327v1133.avi" file-format="avi" /> 

 </presentation-component>

 </complex-presentation> 

 </complex-biometric-signature> 

 <complex-biometric-signature name="nd1S04385" > 

 <complex-presentation name="nd1S04385" modality="Face" > 

 <presentation-component name="Face_HD" > 

 <data file-name="FaceVisibleVideo/04385v1302.ts" file-format="MPEG2-TS" /> 

 </presentation-component>

 </complex-presentation> 

 <complex-presentation name="nd1S04385" modality="Face_NIR" > 

 <presentation-component name="Face_NIR" > 

 <data file-name="FaceNIRVideo/04385v1299.avi" file-format="avi" /> 

 </presentation-component>

 </complex-presentation> 

 </complex-biometric-signature> 

</biometric-signature-set> 

Figure 4 Example of a Complex Signature Set 

4.3.3 Parsing 

Signature sets are difficult to parse due to their rich hierarchical structure. Fortunately, C++ and 

Java classes for parsing Similarity Matrices are provided in the BEE (Biometric Experimentation 

Environment) distribution. These classes are available to MBE 2010 Portal Track participants. 

We also provide examples for the use of these parsers. It is important to note that some of the 

BEE examples assume the simplified Sigset structure in which each Signature has precisely one 

Presentation, each Presentation has precisely one Component and each Component has precisely 

one Data member. Care should be used which using this simplified version of the Similarity 

structure. Parsers are not provided for other languages (e.g. C#). However, users should be able 

15 
to create a Java wrapper that parses the Signature Set and passed the appropriate data structures 

to this executables. 

4.3.4 Writing 

Like most XML documents, Signature sets are easier to write than they are to parse. Thus, users 

can either use the C++ and Java classes supplied in BEE to create Signature Sets or output them 

directly. We recommend that the supplied classes be used because they have been rigorously 

tested and can easily be made compliant with changes in the schema for Signature Sets. 

4.4 Similarity Matrices 

4.4.1 Overview 

Similarity Matrices are the primary output structures of recognition algorithms in MBE 2010 

Portal Track. They consist of a header that specified the type and dimension of the contained 

data and the N×M scores from the biometric algorithm. It is important to note that executables 

must create a similarity score for all specified comparisons – even if the executable fails to create 

a template for the biometric sample. 

4.4.2 Structure 

The Similarity Matrix is similar to many image files in that it contains a textual header followed 

by a binary representation of an N×M data structure. The structure of the header is depicted 

below in Figure 5. Here, we see that the header consist of four lines. The first line must contain 

the either the character ‘D’ (for distance matrix) or the character ‘S’ (similarity matrix) followed 

by the character ‘2’. The second and third lines should contain the name of the target and query 

signature set respectively. The target and query name should be the same as they were specified 

in the call to the matching executable. The fourth line should contain the characters ‘MF’, a 

space, the number of signatures in the query sigset, a space, the number of signatures in the 

target sigset, a space and the integer 0x12345678 written in binary format. All four lines in the 

header should be terminated by a carriage return (CR) character. Table 4 describes the elements 

in the similarity header. 

16 
 

D2 

BEE_DIST/signature_sets/MBE_Exp_1.0_Target.xml 

BEE_DIST/signature_sets/MBE_Exp_1.0_Query.xml 

MF 1425 1425 xV4 

Figure 5 Example of the Similarity Matrix Header 

Name Format Separator Comments 

Storage Type Character ‘S’ or ‘D’ none Specified similarity scores, ‘S’, or 

distance measures ‘D’. 

Version The character ‘2’ CR1 The value ‘2’ corresponds to the 

version of similarity matrix. 

Target name string CR 

(0x0d) 

This string should be the same as the 

name of the target sigset provided to the 

matching algorithm. 

Query name string CR 

(0x0d) 

This string should be the same as the 

name of the query sigset provided to the 

matching algorithm. 

Format The characters ‘MF’ space 

(0x20) 

The values correspond to a matrix, ‘M’, 

containing float, ‘F’, values. 

Rows integer Space 

(0x20) 

The number of signatures in the query 

set. 

Cols integer Space 

(0x20) 

The number of signatures in the target 

set. 

Magic number 0x12345678 

(4-bytes binary) 

CR 

(0x0d) 

This binary value is used to check for 

Endian (byte swapping). 

Table 4 Description of Elements in the Similarity Header 

The scores are written to the file immediately following the header. These should be N×M 4-byte 

binary floating point values. Here, N is the number of signatures in the query set and M is the 

number of signatures in the target set. Thus, the first M values correspond to comparing the first 

query signature (sample) to each of the target signatures (samples). There must not be any white 

space characters separating scores (or lines) in the body of the Similarity Matrix. 

1

 CR: the ASCII carriage return character (0x0d). 

17 
4.4.3 Parsing 

C++ and Java classes for parsing Similarity Matrices are provided in the BEE (Biometric 

Experimentation Environment) distribution. These classes will are available to MBE 2010 Portal 

Track participants. Parsers written in other languages (e.g. C#) will not be made available. 

However, users should be able to easily create parsers in other language using the C++ classes as 

guides. 

4.4.4 Writing 

C++ and Java classes for writing Similarity Matrices are provided in the BEE (Biometric 

Experimentation Environment) distribution. These classes are available to MBE 2010 Portal 

Track participants. Parsers written in other languages (e.g. C#) will not be made available. 

However, users should be able to easily write Similarity Matrices in other language using the 

C++ classes as guides. 

4.5 Imagery 

4.5.1 Overview 

MBE 2010 Portal Track participants will be required to process both still frame images and 

video sequences. Still frame images will be in the JPEG (.jpg), the JPEG 2000 (.jp2) or the Tiff 

(.tiff) format. Video sequences will be in the AVI (.avi), or the MPEG-TS (.ts) format. 

4.5.2 Structure 

The structure of JPEG, JPEG 2000, Tiff, MPEG-TS, and AVI files are published as ISO standard 

and/or are readily available on the internet. Additionally, information reading these formats is 

available in ISO specifications. 

4.5.3 Parsing 

Libraries containing parsers for JPEG, JPEG 2000, Tiff, AVI and the MPEG formats are readily 

available as freeware, shareware and commercially. 

4.5.4 Writing 

MBE 2010 Portal Track participants will not be required to write (output) imagery and therefore 

are not required to create images in the JPEG, JPEG 2000, Tiff, AVI, or MPEG formats. 

18 
5 FAQs 

Q1: Should I assume that my executable will run in the bin/ directory? 

A1: No. The executable will be run from the top-level directory of our package. The name of the 

executable will be specified relative to this directory. 

Q2: Which libraries (.dll and .lib) should be included in the submission? 

A2: All libraries (static and dynamic) that are not part of the underlying operating system and 

are necessary to run your application must be included in the submission 

Q3. How can I ensure my executable is not dependent on any libraries installed on my machine 

that will not be on the MBE 2010 Portal Track systems? 

A3. We recommend that prior to submitting your application, you wipe a system clean (e.g. 

reformat the HDD), install the OS and then install your application and execute it. 

Q4: In which directory should DLLs be placed? 

A4: DLLs should be placed in either the bin/ directory or in the lib/. 

Q5: Will the MBE 2010 Portal Track filenames and/or directory names contain blanks (or 

whitespace)? 

A5: No. We will not utilize any filenames or directory names that contain whitespace characters. 

Our naming convention uses an underscore or an uppercase character to separate words within 

filenames. 

Q6: Can I submit the same algorithm for both 1-1 and 1-many tests. 

A6: Yes. While an algorithm that parses 1-1 tests is must be submitted for the experiment, 

submittal of an algorithm for processing 1-many tests is optional. Refer to Table 1 for details as 

to how submittal will be used. 

Q7: What kind of information should be written to the log file? 

19 
A7: A log file output should include information that will help to determine the cause of a 

potential interruption of execution. It should be informational enough to indicate why and where 

the executable stopped. For example, if a file was not found, a good log output will state: 

“*** ERROR – the image file filename_including full_path was not found. ***” 

Q8. What are some of the common reasons that executable failed during previous evaluations? 

Q8. Common causes of execution interruption include: 

- Missing libraries necessary to run the executable; 

- The executable could not locate the specified file; 

- The executable could not open the specified file; 

- The executable locks up, crashes or throws an exception while processing a sample (i.e. 

image or video); 

- An executable could not create a template from the specified file (e.g. insufficient 

quality); 

- The executable has a memory leak and used all available system memory; 

- The executable tried to access a directory that it does not have read/write permission; 

- The executable does not accept the specified arguments; 

- Input or output directories or filenames are hardcoded in the executable and thus are not 

read properly from the command line. 

Q9: What should my executable do if it cannot create a template for a given biometric sample 

(image)? 

A9: Submitted executables must create a similarity score for all specified comparisons – even if 

the executable fails to create a template for the biometric sample. Incomplete similarity matrices 

will cause inaccurate accuracy scores to be calculated during the evaluation. 

Q10: Can I submit multiple algorithms for a given experiment type? 

A10: Yes. In addition to being able to submit both a 1-1 and a 1-many algorithm, participants 

can submit up to two executable for a given experiment type/matching type combination. For 

20 
instance, participants can submit two “Face_1-1” executables and a “Face_1-many” 

executable. If a second executable is submitted for an experiment type/matching type 

combination, then an explanation must to be provided describing the reason for multiple 

executables (e.g. submittal 1 is optimized for high-resolution images while submittal 2 is 

optimized for low resolution/quality images). The version of multiple algorithms must be 

indicated in the executable name as described in Section 3.1 (e.g. the “Face_1-1” executables 

should be labeled “Face_1-1_1”and “Face_1-1_2” executables respectively). We recommend 

that participants label the algorithm version of their primary submittal as “_1”. 

Q11: Do I have to participate in all five of the experiment types? 

A11: No, you can submit algorithms to any one or more of the five experiment types. 

Q12: What are the experiment types for the portal evaluations? 

A12: The MBE 2010 Portal Track will consist of four experiment types. Visible face still images 

compared to visible video will be denoted “Face”. Visible face still images compared to NIR 

video sequences will be denoted “FaceNIR”. Iris NIR stills compared to NIR Video will be 

denoted “Iris”. The final experiment type considered the fusion of visible face still images and 

iris NIR stills compared to visible video paired with NIR video sequences. This experiment type 

is denoted “Fusion”. Raw video sequences in the MBE 2010 Portal Track will be in the JPEG, 

JPEG 2000, AVI, DV or MPEG-TS file formats. 

Q13: Does the Portal Track use the complex signature set structure shown in Figure 4? If not, 

why was it included? 

A13: Yes, the signature sets for the “Fusion” experiments will contain two presentations per 

signature. Specifically, each target signatures will have both a face visible still image and an iris 

NIR stillwhile each query signature will have a visible video and a NIR video. 

Q14: What format will the input (raw) images be in? 

A14: MBE 2010 Portal Track participants will be required to process both still frame images 

and video sequences. Face still frame images will be in either the JPEG (.jpg) or the JPEG 2000 

21 
(.jp2) format. Iris still frame images will be in the JPEG (.jpg) or the TIFF (.tiff) format. Visible 

video will be in the MPEG-TS (.ts) format. NIR video will be in the AVI (.avi) format. 

Q15: Can I submit a draft version of my executable prior to the final submittal date so that the 

MBE 2010 evaluation team can confirm compliance with the MBE 2010 Portal Track 

guidelines? 

A15: Yes. MBE 2010 Portal Track participants may submit their executables two weeks prior the 

final due day for compliance verification. The sole purpose of pre-submittal is to ensure that the 

executables followed the rules in this document. The MBE 2010 Portal Track evaluations will be 

performed on the final submittals - not the pre-submittal. 

Q16: What sensor will be used to capture the iris NIR still images? 

A16: The iris NIR still images will be from either the LG2200 or the LG4000 sensor. Some 

experiments will involve cross-sensor performance evaluation where the target signatures are 

from one sensor and the query signatures are from the other sensor. 

Q17: What is the difference between Face Visible Video and the Visible Video? 

A17: The face visible video are still or video images that are focused on the subject’s face. The 

visible video usually contains a larger view of the subject’s body that is not necessarily centered 

on the subject’s face. 

Q18: The Video Track Application and the Portal Track Application document each specify a 

deadline for the receipt of the signed application and of the executables. Do those deadlines 

really refer to the arrival at NIST or do they refer to the shipping date? 

A18: The 31 March 2010 for the Video Track and 12 April 2010 date for the Portal Track refer 

to the shipping date. Please e-mail mbe2010@nist.gov that you have shipped a submission. 

This will allow us to confirm receipt of the submission or let you know that we have not received 

your submission. 

Q19: Clause 5.7 of the Video Track Application and the Portal Track Application document 

states that "Participants acknowledge that any test details and/or modifications that are provided 

22 
in the MBE 2010 website supersede the information on this application." Since the website is 

subject to change, does the clause refer to a certain state of it? Otherwise, could you please 

elaborate on what kind of additions and modifications this clause is meant to cover? In the Still 

Face Track Application document, the reference to the website in the corresponding clause was 

removed. Will you modify the Video Track Application and the Portal Track Application 

documents in an analogous way? 

A19: The Video Track Application and the Portal Track Application will be modified to 

reference. The document will now reference the MBE 2010 Video Guidelines for Participants 

version on Monday 29 March 2010 or MBE 2010 Portal Guidelines for Participants version on 

Wednesday 7 April 2010. 

Q20: Will always at most one face be visible in every still image and every frame of every 

video? 

A20: Since the video sequences were acquired in atria and outdoors, there are video sequences 

with people in the background. The person to be recognized is the largest and most prominent 

person in the video sequence. All video sequences in the MBE 2010 Video Track are being 

visually inspected. Since the still images with uncontrolled illumination were acquired in atria 

and outdoors, there are still images with people in the background. The person to be recognized 

is the largest and most prominent person in the still image. 

Q21: Could you please provide some information on the appearance variations to be expected in 

the still images and the videos to be used in the Video Track and the Portal Track? Are the 

images and videos from the MBGC Video Challenges and Portal Challenges representative for 

those to be used in the Video Track and Portal Track, respectively? 

A21: The still images and video sequences in the MBGC Video and Portal Tracks are 

representative of those in the MBE 2010 Video and Portal Tracks. The video sequences in the 

MBGC Video Track were acquired in high definition and standard definition. In addition to this 

mode, the MBE 2010 Video Track will contain video sequences acquired with the commercial 

hand held video camera; e.g., the Flip or KODAK Digital Video Cameras. 

23 
Q22: What will be the range of face sizes (e.g. in terms of distance between the eye centers) in 

the still images and the videos to be used in the Video Track and Portal Track, both absolute (in 

pixels) and relative to the image/video dimensions? 

A22: The still images and video sequences in the MBGC Video and Portal Tracks are 

representative of those in the MBE 2010 Video and Portal Tracks. The video sequences in the 

MBGC Video Track were acquired in high definition and standard definition. In addition to this 

mode, the MBE 2010 Video Track will contain video sequences acquired with the commercial 

hand held video camera; e.g.., the Flip or KODAK Digital Video Cameras. 

Q23: Will a signature set refer to data of the same kind only, i.e. only to videos or only to still 

images, or can both kinds of data occur in an individual signature set? 

A23: Signature sets will only consist only of still images or consist only of video sequences. 

Signature sets will not contain a mixture of still images and video sequences. 

Q24: In a subset of the MBGC still images and videos, the face was not upright but rotated by 90 

degrees. Will such images and videos also occur in the Video Track and/or Portal Track? If yes, 

will this property be revealed somehow, e.g. in the signature set? 

A24: The experiment parameter file contains a pose attribute that can talk values frontal, nonfrontal, and varied. For video, frontal means that the sequences contain frames with frontal 

faces; e.g., walking sequences from the MBGC Video Track. For video, non-frontal means that 

the sequences do not contain frames with frontal faces; e.g., activity sequences from the MBGC 

Video Track. The MBE 2010 Video Track, signatures sets will either be frontal or non-frontal. 

In the Video Track, all video sequences will be in the standard orientation. In the portal track, 

all HD video sequences will be rotated by 90 degrees as in the MBGC Portal Track. 

Q25: A subset of the MBGC videos were encoded with an aspect ratio that was different from 

the true one. Will such videos also occur in the Video Track and/or Portal Track? If yes, will 

this property be revealed somehow, e.g. by providing the true aspect ratio in the signature set? 

A25: The encoding of the aspects ratios in the MBGC video is representative of the aspect ratio 

encoding in the MBE 2010 videos. The state of the encoding will not be provided to participants. 

24 
Q26: What are the exact strings that can occur as values for the attribute "file-format" in the 

signature sets? 

A26: The “file-format” attribute may have values “avi”, “jpeg”, “jpeg2000”, “mpeg4”, 

“MPEG-TS”, “MPEG2-TS”, or “tiff”. 

Q27: What video compression formats will be used within the container formats AVI and 

MPEG-TS? Will they be the same as in the MBGC? 

A27: The avi files will have either the Y800 or the FFMpeg MPEG-4 codec. The MPEG-TS will 

have the MPEG-1 codec and the MPEG2-TS files will have the MPEG-2 codec. These are the 

same codec used in the MBGC. 

Q28: Section 3.3.2 of the Portal Track guideline document contains a table showing the structure 

of the names for the 1-many matching executables. The name templates in that table contain the 

substring "1-many". Can we assume that this is an error and that the substring should actually 

read "1-N", as specified in Table 1? 

A28: Table 1 is correct. The name of 1-many executables will contain the substring “1-N”. 

Q29: According to Table 2 and the remarks in section 3.4.2 of the Portal Track guideline 

document, executables may write a copy of the input signature sets, with quality scores included, 

to the directory "output". What filenames should be used for those copies? How should the 

quality scores be recorded in the signature sets? 

A29: The copy of the signature sets containing quality information should have the string 

“_qual” appended to the basename of the of the original sigset name. For example, if the name 

of the original sigset is “my_xml/original_sigset.xml” the quality sigset should be named 

“my_xml/original_sigset_qual.xml”. 

Q30: How should the quality scores be added to the signature sets? Maybe by using some 

special signature attribute? 

25 
A30: Please follow the quality signature set formed used in ICE 2006. 

Q31: Table 2 in the guideline document specify "Input/Output" as type of the parameter 

similarity_file. Can we assume that this is an error and that the type should actually be "Output"? 

A31: The similarity file is an Output parameter. 

Q32: Table 3 in the guideline document lists the attribute "capture", but it does not occur in the 

parameter file example in Figure 2. Will that attribute be included in the actual parameter files 

used for the MBE? 

A32: No. The capture attribute will not be used. 

Q33: What is the maximal amount of virtual memory that can be occupied by a process running 

an executable? 

A33: The virtual address space of applications is limited to 2 GB. 

Q34: What is the maximal number of frames per video? In the 1-many experiments, what is the 

maximal total number of frames in a gallery of videos? 

A34: The video sequences in the MBGC Video Track are representative of the length of the video 

sequences in the MBE 2010 Video Track. The majority of the video will contain less than 1000 

frames. 

Q35: Will the faces in the still images in the Video and Portal tracks be in portrait or landscape 

mode? 

A35: The faces in the still images could be in either portrait or landscape mode. The orientation 

for portrait and landscape mode will be the same as in the MBGC. 

Q36: MBE2010 Still Face Track specified what machines will be used for testing the submitted 

executables/libraries. However, no such information is available for the Portal Track (the only 

available information is that 32bit OS will be used). Using several threads for computation can 

speed up evaluation several times. Can our executable use all available server resources for 

performing its task? In that case it would be good to know the limit of RAM, HDD space, 

number of logical processors, etc. 

A36: Only one executable will be run at a time on the workstation. Therefore, each executable 

will have access to all systems resources within the constraints of the operating system. The 

workstations will have a single logical processor and 4GB of physical memory but the OS will 

limit each executable to 2GB. We expect that the amount of HDD required for an executable 

(other than the space required by the output data types) will be no more than a few times the size 

26 
of a single input image sample. Please let us know if your executable required more HDD space 

and why. 

Q37: Please clarify which image/video formats will be used in the experiments. Section 4.5.1 

specifies that only JPEG (.jpg), JPEG 2000 (.jp2), Tiff (.tiff), AVI (.avi), and MPEG-TS (.ts) 

formats will be used. However, FAQ A12 adds DV video format. 

A37: While the DV format was used in MBGC, it will not be used in the MBE. 

Q38: Do you think it is safe to provide "biometric-signature/presentation name", which refer to 

person's unique identifier, in sigsets? 

A38: The biometric-signature/presentation names will be randomized in the signature sets used 

for the tests. Specifically, two images of the same person will not have the same id. 

Q39: MBE2010 Still Face Track specified what machines will be used for testing the submitted 

executables/libraries. However, no such information is available for the Portal Track (the only 

available information is that 32bit OS will be used). Using several threads for computation can 

speed up evaluation several times. Can our executable use all available server resources for 

performing its task? In that case it would be good to know the limit of RAM, HDD space, 

number of logical processors, etc. 

A39: Only one executable will be run at a time on the workstation. Therefore, each executable 

will have access to all systems resources within the constraints of the operating system. The 

workstations will have a single logical processor and 4GB of physical memory but the OS will 

limit each executable to 2GB. We expect that the amount of HDD required for an executable 

(other than the space required by the output data types) will be no more than a few times the size 

of a single input image sample. Please let us know if your executable required more HDD space 

and why. 

Q40: In section 3.3 of guidelines it is said: "The “Iris” experiment will 

include cross–sensor performance evaluations. Iris images will be acquired by a LG2200, a 

LG4000, and Iris on the Move (IoM) sensors. Here, 

27 
iris NIR still images taken from the LG2200 will be compared to images 

from the LG4000 sensor." Does it mean that images from IoM sensor will 

not be used in experiments for matching irises? 

A40: In the MBE 2010 Portal Track, images from the following sensors will be matched: 

LG2200 to LG2200, LG4000 to LG4000, LG2200 to LG4000, LG4000 to LG2200, LG2200 to 

IoM NIR, and LG4000 to IoM NIR. 

Q41: Does the Face NIR (NIR video sequences) actually refer to video sequences from IoM 

sensor? 

A41: Yes. 

Q42: Please clarify which image/video formats will be used in the experiments. Section 4.5.1 

specifies that only JPEG (.jpg), JPEG 2000 (.jp2), Tiff (.tiff), AVI (.avi), and MPEG-TS (.ts) 

formats will be used. However, FAQ A12 adds DV video format. 

A42: While the DV format was used in MBGC, it will not be used in the MBE. 

Q43: Please clarify whether the following is correct: 

Face experiment: 

 Target sigset will contain JPEG or JPEG2000 images. 

Query sigset will contain MPEG-TS videos. 

FaceNIR experiment: 

 Target sigset will contain JPEG or JPEG2000 images. 

 Query sigset will contain AVI videos (captured with IoM sensor). 

Iris experiment: 

 Target sigset will contain JPEG or TIFF images. 

 Query sigset will contain AVI videos (captured with IoM sensor). 

Fusion experiment: 

 Target sigset will combine simple presentations of target sigsets 

from Face and Iris experiments into complex presentations.

 Query sigset will combine simple presentations of query sigsets 

28 
 

from Face and Iris experiments into complex presentations. 

A43: Yes. 

Q44: In section 3.3 of guidelines it is said: "iris NIR still images 

taken from the LG2200 will be compared to images from the LG4000 

sensor". But there is no such experiment where iris images are compared 

to iris images. 

A44: All the above cases fall into the iris matching experiments of the MBE 2010 Portal Track, 

see section 2.4.3 of the MBE 2010 Portal Track Application. 

Q45: The MBGC contained an experiment that matched video from an LG2200. Will the MBE 

2010 Portal Track include experiments use video from the LG2200? 

A45: The MBE 2010 Portal Track will not use video sequences acquired by the LG2200. 

Q46: In the MBE 2010 Portal Track, what is maximum number of biometric recordings 

referenced in a signature set? 

A46: In the MBE 2010 Portal Track, the maximum number of biometric recordings referenced in 

a signature set is 5,000. Please note, a signature set contains a list of biometric sample. A 

biometric sample in turn consists of a set of biometric recordings, where a recording could be 

still images or video sequences. Examples: 1) when matching a single still face image, each 

biometric sample consists of one recordings; 2) in a fusion example a biometric sample could 

consists of two recordings; e.g., a HD video recording and a NIR video recording; 3) in a video 

matching experiment, each biometric sample could consist of one video recording; and 4) in a 

matching experiment with multiple still images per person, each biometric sample will consist of 

multiple recordings where each recording is a still image. 

29