This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains documents other than rules or

proposed rules that are applicable to the

public. Notices of hearings and investigations,

committee meetings, agency decisions and

rulings, delegations of authority, filing of

petitions and applications and agency

statements of organization and functions are

examples of documents appearing in this

section.

Notices Federal Register

72164 

Vol. 79, No. 234 

Friday, December 5, 2014 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

December 1, 2014. 

The Department of Agriculture has 

submitted the following information 

collection requirement(s) to OMB for 

review and clearance under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

Public Law 104–13. Comments 

regarding (a) whether the collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate 

of burden including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; (c) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on those who are to respond, including 

through the use of appropriate 

automated, electronic, mechanical, or 

other technological collection 

techniques and other forms of 

information technology. 

Comments regarding this information 

collection received by January 5, 2015 

will be considered. Written comments 

should be addressed to: Desk Officer for 

Agriculture, Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs, Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB), New 

Executive Office Building, 725 17th 

Street NW., Washington, DC 20503. 

Commentors are encouraged to submit 

their comments to OMB via email to: 

OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax 

(202) 395–5806 and to Departmental 

Clearance Office, USDA, OCIO, Mail 

Stop 7602, Washington, DC 20250– 

7602. Copies of the submission(s) may 

be obtained by calling (202) 720–8681. 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor a collection of information 

unless the collection of information 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number and the agency informs 

potential persons who are to respond to 

the collection of information that such 

persons are not required to respond to 

the collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number. 

Forest Service 

Title: Generic Clearance for Large 

Scale Collaborative Project Socioeconomic Monitoring. 

OMB Control Number: 0596—NEW. 

Summary of Collection: The Forest 

Landscape Restoration Act of 2009 (16 

U.S.C. 7303) requires the Forest Service 

to monitor socio-economic impacts of 

collaborative restoration activities 

within the project site. In addition, the 

2012 Planning Rule (36 CFR part 219) 

requires a transparent, collaborative and 

informed planning process. Large scale 

collaborative projects involve interested 

parties, such as neighboring land 

owners, state, local and tribal 

government representatives, businesses, 

interest groups and nonprofit 

organizations working with a federal 

government agency to find common 

ground pertaining to geographically 

extensive land management, often 

across multiple jurisdictions. Bureau of 

Land Management (BLM) and U.S. 

Forest Service (FS) collaboration on 

large scale projects also extends beyond 

Collaborative Forest Landscape 

Restoration and Management Plans. 

Need and Use of the Information: 

Data will be collected through a variety 

of methods, including: A census survey 

of partners/participants of a 

collaborative project; mail-survey of 

residents in the large scale collaborative 

project or planning areas; survey of 

spending habits of restoration workers; 

and key informant interviews with 

business, community, stakeholder 

leaders in collaborative project and 

planning areas. Results will assist 

program managers in evaluating the 

positive and negative social and 

economic effects of collaborative project 

implementation and assist FS and BLM 

forest planners in meeting collaborative 

and public input requirement of the 

2012 Forest Planning Rule. 

Description of Respondents: 

Individuals; Business or other for-profit; 

Not-for-profit institutions; State, Local 

or Tribal Governments. 

Number of Respondents: 48,800. 

Frequency of Responses: Reporting: 

Annually. 

Total Burden Hours: 38,800. 

Forest Service 

Title: Generic Clearance for the 

Stewardship Mapping and Assessment 

Project (STEW–MAP). 

OMB Control Number: 0596—NEW. 

Summary of Collection: The 

Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 

1978 (Pub. L. 113–79) Section 9(a); 

(b)(8); (c) and (d); The Forest and 

Rangeland Renewable Resources 

Research Act of 1978 and the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

authorize the Forest Service to expand 

and strengthen existing research, 

education, technical assistance and 

public information and participation in 

tree planting and maintenance programs 

through stewardship. Civic 

environmental stewards are involved in 

a range of activities like planting trees, 

organizing community gardens, offering 

environment-themed classes, leading 

local conservation efforts, monitoring 

plants and animals, and cleaning up 

nearby parks or natural areas. These 

stewards may be nonprofit 

organizations, formal or informal 

community groups, faith-based 

organizations, or academic institutions. 

STEW–MAP will create a publicly 

available database and map of 

stewardship groups, their activities, and 

where they work. 

Need and Use of the Information: 

Information will be gathered on civic 

stewardship groups and their efforts 

such as where they work, the types of 

projects they focus on, and how they are 

organized. There are three phases to a 

STEW–MAP project: (1) A census to put 

together a master list of known 

stewardship groups and their contact 

information in the target city or region; 

(2) a survey distributed to all of the 

organizations identified in phase one to 

collect information about what they 

work on, structure of the group and 

what other groups they collaborate with; 

and (3) follow-up interviews with key 

longstanding organizations identified 

during phase two, to collect more 

detailed information about 

organizational histories. 

Description of Respondents: Business 

or other for-profit; Not-for-profit 

institutions; State, Local or Tribal 

Governments. 

Number of Respondents: 15,900. 

Frequency of Responses: Reporting: 

Annually. 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 234 / Friday, December 5, 2014 / Notices 72165 

1See Final Results Of Redetermination Pursuant 

To Court Remand, Consol. Court No. 11–00451, Slip 

Op. 13–106 (CIT August 15, 2013), dated January 

9, 2014, available at http://enforcement.trade.gov/

remands/13-106.pdf. 

2 Id. at 8–10. As we explain below, the 

Department’s recalculation of these surrogate values 

continued to yield a de minimis weighted-average 

dumping margin for Calgon Tianjin. Thus, 

consistent with our practice, the Department has 

not amended the final results with respect to Calgon 

Tianjin. 

3The Department found Ningxia Guanghua and 

Beijing Pacific to be affiliated and a single entity in 

First Administrative Review of Certain Activated 

Carbon From the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 74 FR 57995, 57998 (November 10, 2009). 

4See Remand at 10–13. 

5See Certain Activated Carbon From the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results and Partial 

Rescission of Third Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 76 FR 67142 (October 31, 

2011) (‘‘AR3 Final Results’’) and the accompanying 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Total Burden Hours: 7,925. 

Charlene Parker, 

Departmental Information Collection 

Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28552 Filed 12–4–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3411–15–P 

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS 

Sunshine Act Meeting 

AGENCY: United States Commission on 

Civil Rights. 

ACTION: Notice of Commission Business 

Meeting. 

DATES: Date and Time: Friday, 

December 12, 2014; 9:30 a.m. EST. 

ADDRESSES: Place: 1331 Pennsylvania 

Ave. NW., Suite 1150, Washington, DC. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, Public 

Affairs Unit (202) 376–8591. 

Hearing-impaired persons who will 

attend the briefing and require the 

services of a sign language interpreter 

should contact Pamela Dunston at (202) 

376–8105 or at signlanguage@usccr.gov 

at least seven business days before the 

scheduled date of the meeting. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Meeting Agenda 

This meeting is open to the public. 

I. Approval of Agenda 

II. Program Planning 

• Review and Vote of the 2015 

Statutory Enforcement Report 

Discovery Plan 

• Discussion and Vote on Updating 

Select Commission Reports 

III. Management and Operations 

• Presentations from the Illinois and 

Georgia SAC Chairs on their 

Immigration Projects 

• Staff Director’s Report 

IV. State Advisory Committee (SAC) 

Appointments 

• Indiana 

V. Adjourn Meeting 

Dated: December 2, 2014. 

Marlene Sallo, 

Staff Director. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28649 Filed 12–3–14; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[B–55–2014] 

Foreign-Trade Zone 221—Mesa, 

Arizona; Authorization of Production 

Activity; Apple Inc./GTAT Corp. 

(Components for Consumer 

Electronics); Mesa, Arizona 

On July 31, 2014, the City of Mesa, 

grantee of FTZ 221, submitted a 

notification of proposed production 

activity to the Foreign-Trade Zones 

(FTZ) Board on behalf of Apple Inc./

GTAT Corp., within Subzone 221A, in 

Mesa, Arizona. 

The notification was processed in 

accordance with the regulations of the 

FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including 

notice in the Federal Register inviting 

public comment (79 FR 47088–47089, 

8–12–2014). The FTZ Board has 

determined that no further review of the 

activity is warranted at this time. The 

production activity described in the 

notification is authorized, subject to the 

FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, 

including Section 400.14. 

Dated: November 28, 2014. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28582 Filed 12–4–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–904] 

Certain Activated Carbon From the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of 

Court Decision Not in Harmony With 

Final Results of Administrative Review 

and Notice of Amended Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2009–2010 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On November 24, 2014, the 

United States Court of International 

Trade (‘‘the Court’’) issued final 

judgment in Albemarle Corp. et al. v. 

United States, Consol. Court No. 11– 

00451, sustaining the Department of 

Commerce’s (‘‘the Department’’) final 

results of redetermination pursuant to 

remand (‘‘Remand’’).1 In the Remand, 

the Department recalculated the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

Calgon Carbon (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.’s 

(‘‘Calgon Tianjin’’) using revised 

surrogate values for coal and fine byproducts.2 The Department also 

recalculated in the Remand the 

dumping margin for three respondents 

not selected for individual examination 

(i.e., the separate rate)—Ningxia 

Guanghua Cherishmet Activated Carbon 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘Ningxia Guanghua’’) and its 

affiliate Beijing Pacific Activated Carbon 

Products Co., Ltd. (‘‘Beijing Pacific’’) 

(together, ‘‘Cherishmet’’),3 as well as 

Shanxi DMD Corporation (‘‘Shanxi 

DMD’’).4

Consistent with the decision of the 

United States Court of Appeals for the 

Federal Circuit (‘‘CAFC’’) in Timken Co. 

v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 

1990) (‘‘Timken’’), as clarified by 

Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. 

United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 

2010), the Department is notifying the 

public that the final judgment in this 

case is not in harmony with the 

Department’s final results of the 

antidumping duty administrative review 

of the antidumping duty order on 

certain activated carbon from the 

People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) 

covering the period of review (‘‘POR’’) 

April 1, 2009, through March 31, 2010, 

and is amending the final results with 

respect to the weighted-average 

dumping margins assigned to Ningxia 

Guanghua, Beijing Pacific, and Shanxi 

DMD.5

DATES: Effective Date: December 4, 

2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert Palmer, AD/CVD Operations 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–9068. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES