alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6396

ROBERT DENT , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. COLIN OTTEY, MD , Regional Medical Director , Defendant

- Appellee , and WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED; GILMORE JANICE, Supervisor Medical Provider; ROBUSTIANO BARRERA, Medical Provider; PEGGY MAHLER, Medical Provider , Defendants

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Catherine C. Blake , Chief District Judge. ( 8:15

- cv
- 00206

- CCB )

Submitted : September 11, 2017 Decided: October 3, 2017

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirm e d by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Robert Dent , Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Conrad Meister , Gina Marie Smith , MEYERS, RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, PA , Riverdale, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Robert Dent appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant Colin Ottey as to Dent’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) claim of deliberate
indifference to his medical needs. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

erro r. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court.
Dent v. Ottey , No. 8:15

- cv
- 00206

- CCB (D. Md. Mar. 9, 2017); see also Harrods Ltd. v
. Sixty Internet Domain Names , 302 F.3d 214, 244

- 45 (4th Cir. 2002) (discussing requirements to preserve claim that summary judgment was granted prematurely ). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

t his court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRM ED

* Although Dent’s informal brief also identifies the district court’s March 17, 2016 , order dismissing the action in part and granting summary judgment in part, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to review that order. See Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(1)(B); Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 176

- 77 (4th Cir . 2014).
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology

National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

ISSUE DATE:

May 4, 2022

LAB BULLETIN

NUMBER: LB-145-2022

LAP: Radiation 

Detection Instruments

SUBJECT: Release of NIST Handbook 150-23, 2022 Edition

NIST Handbook 150-23, which presents the technical requirements and guidance for the accreditation of 

laboratories under the NVLAP Radiation Detection Instruments testing program, has been revised, along 

with the corresponding NIST Handbook 150-23 checklist. The handbook was revised with participation 

from experts in the field of testing radiation detection instruments.

The following main changes have been made to this handbook with respect to the previous edition:

• the numbering has been updated to reflect that used by ISO/IEC 17025:2017, General requirements 

for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories;

• included reference to the IEC standards used for detection of illicit trafficking of radioactive 

materials.

The 2022 edition of NIST Handbook 150-23 supersedes and replaces the 2010 edition. It is available for 

downloading (PDF format) from the NVLAP website <http://www.nist.gov/nvlap> under NVLAP 

Program-Specific Handbooks. The corresponding NIST Handbook 150-23 Checklist has also been updated 

and posted on the NVLAP website under NVLAP Publications and Forms.

Questions concerning the revised handbook or requirements for accreditation should be directed to Brad 

Moore at 301-975-5740 or brad.moore@nist.gov.

NVLAP LAB BULLETIN NUMBER: LB-145-2022 PAGE: 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                   Exhibit 21

                         Subsidiaries of The Registrant
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit (21)

(21)    SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                                              STATE OF
NAME                                                       INCORPORATION


The Annapolis Banking and Trust Company                     Maryland
Baltimore Trust Company                                     Delaware
Bank of Southern Maryland                                   Maryland
Calvert Bank and Trust Company                              Maryland
The Chestertown Bank of Maryland                            Maryland
The Citizens National Bank                                  United States
County Banking & Trust Company                              Maryland
Farmers & Merchants Bank - Eastern Shore                    Virginia
The Fidelity Bank                                           Maryland
The First National Bank of St. Mary's                       United States
The Forest Hill State Bank                                  Maryland
Fredericktown Bank & Trust Company                          Maryland
Marshall National Bank and Trust Company                    United States
MBC Agency, Inc.                                            Maryland
  Mercantile Life Insurance Company                         Arizona
MBC Realty, LLC                                             Maryland
Mercantile-Safe Deposit and Trust Company                   Maryland
  Mercantile Mortgage Corporation                           Maryland
  Hopkins Plaza Agency, Inc.                                Maryland
  MBC Leasing Corp.                                         Maryland
The National Bank of Fredericksburg                         United States
Peninsula Bank                                              Maryland
The Peoples Bank of Maryland                                Maryland
Potomac Valley Bank                                         Maryland
The Sparks State Bank                                       Maryland
St. Michaels Bank                                           Maryland
Westminster Bank and Trust Company of
  Carroll County                                            Maryland

Each of the foregoing subsidiaries conducts business under its corporate name.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha
Nutra, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Marc Urbach, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and will be retained by China
Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






May
      18, 2010Marc
      Urbach(Principal
      Executive Officer)
IoT Advisory Board

March 7th 2023 Meeting

IoT AB Cybersecurity Subgroup

Subgroup Members:

• Kevin Kornegay

• Mike Bergman 

• Pete Tseronis

• Ranveer Chandra

• Steve Griffith

• Tom Katsioulas 
Proposed Cybersecurity Section Content – General 

• Major sectors of IoT—cybersecurity considerations

• Legacy IoT devices (e.g., OT space, smart buildings, consumer)

• Role of chip-based security (incl. TPM and secure device architectures)

• Attack vectors in an IoT Context

• Linkage between security and privacy

• Security and Traceability

• National Cybersecurity Label for Consumer Connected Devices 

• Policy Topics

• Issues

• Solutions, Activities and Opportunities
Policy Topics

• Clarity on the distinction between major IoT sectors: IIoT, IoMT, consumer, etc. 

• Liability issues as a barrier to security 

• Cyber incident reporting for critical infrastructure

• Considerations from the WH National Cybersecurity Strategy
Issues: 

• Security vs privacy, at the hardware level 

• Trusted devices v. secure devices 

• Legacy IoT devices 

• Global ecosystem and fragmentation 

• Transparency 

• Traceability 

• Evolving attacks (e.g., battery draining attacks)

• International considerations
Solutions, Activities and Opportunities

• Consumer IoT labeling and e-Labeling 

• Security by Design (Secure Development Life Cycle)

• Built-in security in products and systems 

• Harmonization to address global fragmentation. 

• Market incentives for implementing cybersecurity

• Advances in IoT cybersecurity (TPM, lightweight crypto, e.g.)

• Training and workforce development
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FIRST COMMUNITY BANK FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           5,277
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          78,521
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,800
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      9,369
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         93,868
<ALLOWANCE>                                        943
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 117,406
<DEPOSITS>                                      89,989
<SHORT-TERM>                                    16,054
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,777
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,668
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,917
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 117,406
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,206
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  135
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    40
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,382
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 946
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,179
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,203
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       26
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    985
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    429
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         429
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       272
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     4.7
<LOANS-NON>                                        263
<LOANS-PAST>                                       149
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   938
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       22
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  943
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               943
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4149 

To amend the Small Business Act to permit business concerns that are 

owned by venture capital operating companies or pension plans to participate in the Small Business Innovation Research Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2004 

Mr. GRAVES (for himself, Mr. HONDA, Mr. INSLEE, and Mrs. KELLY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small 

Business, and in addition to the Committee on Science, for a period to 

be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to permit business concerns that are owned by venture capital operating companies or pension plans to participate in the Small Business 

Innovation Research Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4149 IH 

1 SECTION 1. SBIR AWARDS TO BUSINESS CONCERNS OWNED 

2 BY VENTURE CAPITAL OPERATING COMPA3 NIES OR EMPLOYEE BENEFIT OR PENSION 

4 PLANS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 9(f) of the Small Business 

6 Act (15 U.S.C. 638(f)) is amended by adding at the end 

7 the following: 

8 ‘‘(4) ELIGIBILITY.—A business concern shall 

9 not be prevented from participating in the Small 

10 Business Innovation Research Program solely be11 cause such business concern is owned in part by— 

12 ‘‘(A) a venture capital operating company 

13 that is managed and controlled by 1 or more 

14 United States citizens or permanent resident 

15 aliens; or 

16 ‘‘(B) an employee benefit or pension 

17 plan.’’. 

18 (b) RULEMAKING AUTHORITY.—Not later than 180 

19 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Ad20 ministrator of the Small Business Administration shall 

21 issue regulations to— 

22 (1) carry out the amendment made by sub23 section (a); 

24 (2) ensure that a Small Business Innovation 

25 Research award is not given to a business concern 

26 that is majority owned by— 
3 

•HR 4149 IH 

1 (A) another business concern that is ineli2 gible to participate in the Small Business Inno3 vation Research Program; or 

4 (B) a venture capital operating company or 

5 an employee benefit or pension plan that is the 

6 alter ego, instrumentality, or identity of another 

7 business concern that is ineligible to participate 

8 in the Small Business Innovation Research Pro9 gram. 

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4427 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4427

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 73 South Euclid Avenue in Montauk, New York, as the ``Perry B. Duryea, 
                           Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 73 
South Euclid Avenue in Montauk, New York, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Perry B. Duryea, Jr. Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Perry B. Duryea, Jr. Post 
Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### James A. Rogers v. Merica E. Heath adm’x et al.

*Attorneys*— Liability *for services to estates*— Joint *contractor's.*

Minor heirs cannot bec'omo jointly liable with the administrator in an action of *assumpsit*for services rendered the estate by an attorney.

Persons do not become jointly liable as joint parties or contractors merely from having received benefits from the services of another.

Case made from Kent.

Submitted June 14.

Decided June 21.

Assumpsit. Defendants had judgment below.

Affirmed.

*James A.*Rogers, in person, for plaintiff.

*Taggart <& Wolcott*for defendants.

A demand cannot be sued against one joint defendant as executor and another as personally liable: *Mace v. Page*33 Mich. 38; *Lee v. Bolles*20 Mich. 46; *Ives v. O'Brien*33 Mich. 175; *Thompson v. Richards*14 Mich. 172: Burr. Pr. 24; 1 Chit. Pl. 204, 244-246.

Campbell, J.

Plaintiff sues for a balance due him for services in the litigation connected with the controversy of *Heath v. Waters*40 Mich. 457, formerly disposed of in this court. The defendants are the former administratrix of Elijah Waters, and two of his children and legatees. The court below found that Mr. Rogers had a meritorious claim., but that he could not recover in this action.

*584In this the ruling was correct. This is a suit at law, and can only be made out by a joint obligation. .The fact that several parties may have received benefit directly or indirectly from his services does not put them on a footing of joint parties or contractors. We find nothing to indicate a joint obligation or liability. The suit must be brought against some one who has expressly or impliedly become hound to pay plaintiff for his services. The children clearly, as minors, could not have incurred any obligation of that kind on which a suit in *assumpsit*would lie; neither could they possibly have become joint debtors with the administratrix.

While it is plain enough that Mr. Rogers should be paid, this action cannot be sustained to enforce payment.

The judgment must be affirmed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.
**Exhibit 23**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statement on Form **S-3****(No. 33-44376) and S-8 (333-90307, 333-108123 and 333-115741)**ofMercantile Bankshares Corporation of our report dated March 14, 2005 relatingto the financial statements, financial statements schedules, management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingand the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, whichappears in this Form 10-K.

 
| /s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|

 

Baltimore, Maryland

### March 14, 2005

 

###
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Income  Partners  1988-A  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet  and  statement  of  operations
contained  in its Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         328,983
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  111,375
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               440,358
<PP&E>                                         9,594,308
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,755,925)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,285,193
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          49,424
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,199,187
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,285,193
<SALES>                                        192,508
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               206,666
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  278,044<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (134,536)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (134,536)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (134,536)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>

        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER and PRINCIPAL
       FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
          OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Everest Fund, L.P.
(the "Partnership"), for the quarter ended March 31, 2014,
as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Lamoureux, President
of Everest Asset Management, Inc., the general partner of
the Everest Fund, L.P. (the "Fund"), hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Fund.




      By:  /s/ Peter Lamoureux
         ----------------------
      Name: 	Peter Lamoureux
      Title: 	Director, President and
      		Treasurer

      May 15, 2014


		E-3
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 231 (Tuesday, December 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 71459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28300]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Effective date: December 2, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 25, 2014, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail 
Contract 100 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2015-10, CP2015-13.

Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Requirements.
[FR Doc. 2014-28300 Filed 12-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P