alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 413 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 413

To require the Surface Transportation Board to consider certain issues 
when deciding whether to authorize the construction of a railroad line.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2003

Mr. Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
           the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Surface Transportation Board to consider certain issues 
when deciding whether to authorize the construction of a railroad line.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Neighborhood Rail Accountability 
Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Section 10901 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsections:
    ``(e) In determining whether to issue a certificate authorizing the 
construction of an additional railroad line, or the construction of an 
extension to any railroad line, the Board shall give greater weight to 
local official statements and public comments in opposition to the 
proposed construction, especially with respect to construction in a 
residential area, if there is an an unusually high level of such public 
opposition.
    ``(f) Before issuing a certificate under this section authorizing 
the construction of an additional railroad line, or the construction of 
an extension to any railroad line, the Board shall identify any 
disproportionate negative impacts on any socioeconomic population, and 
shall include a discussion of alternatives that were considered that 
would have avoided such disproportionate negative impacts.
    ``(g) If the Board receives information indicating that an 
applicant for a certificate under this section has provided to the 
Board false information that could materially affect the Board's 
determination, the process of considering the application shall be 
halted until the Board has determined whether such information has been 
provided, and whether the information was knowingly provided. If the 
Board determines that such information has been provided unknowingly, 
the Board shall require the applicant to provide correct information 
before the process may resume. If the Board determines that such 
information has been provided knowingly, the Board shall not issue a 
certificate pursuant to that application.''.
                                 <all>
```
H. R. 4115

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To amend the Act of November 2, 1966 (80 Stat. 1112), to allow binding arbitration

clauses to be included in all contracts affecting the land within the Salt River

Pima-Maricopa Indian Reservation.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BINDING ARBITRATION FOR SALT RIVER PIMA-MARICOPA

INDIAN RESERVATION CONTRACTS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2(c) of the Act of November 2, 1966

(25 U.S.C. 416a(c)), is amended—

(1) in the first sentence—

(A) by striking ‘‘Any lease’’ and all that follows through

‘‘affecting land’’ and inserting ‘‘Any contract, including a

lease, affecting land’’; and

(B) by striking ‘‘such lease or contract’’ and inserting

‘‘such contract’’; and

(2) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘Such leases or

contracts entered into pursuant to such Acts’’ and inserting

‘‘Such contracts’’.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section

shall take effect as if included in the Indian Tribal Economic

Development and Contract Encouragement Act of 2000 (Public Law

106–179).

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**Exhibit 32.1**

The followingcertifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238.  These certifications shall not be deemed “filed”for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, nor shall be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Companyunder the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before or after thedate hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Maui Land & PineappleCompany, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),we, **David C. Cole**and **Robert I. Webber**, respectively, theChairman, President & Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer/SeniorVice President Business Development of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

| /s/ DAVID C. COLE                                  |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| David C. Cole                                      |   |
| Chairman, President &  Chief Executive Officer |   |
| (Principal Executive Officer)                      |   |
|                                               |   |
|                                               |   |
| March 7, 2007                                      |   |   |
| Date                                               |   |
|                                               |   |
|                                               |   |
| /s/ ROBERT I. WEBBER                               |   |
| Robert I. Webber                                   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer/Senior  Vice President     |   |
| Business Development                               |   |
| (Principal Financial Officer)                      |   |
|                                               |   |
|                                               |   |
| March 7, 2007                                      |   |   |
| Date                                               |   |
|                                                    |        |  |  |

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.2
 
                        CAPSTAR BROADCASTING CORPORATION
 
            STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PRO FORMA PER SHARE EARNINGS
                 (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
 
   
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                       YEAR ENDED             MARCH 31,
                                                      DECEMBER 31,    --------------------------
                                                          1997           1997           1998
                                                      ------------    -----------    -----------
<S>                                                   <C>             <C>            <C>
Computation for statement of earnings:
  Pro forma net loss attributable to common stock...  $  (100,776)    $   (23,827)   $   (45,471)
                                                      ===========     ===========    ===========
Computation for pro forma weighted average common
  shares outstanding(1):
  Weighted average common shares outstanding(2).....   46,130,912      46,130,912     46,130,912
  Incremental common shares applicable to common
     stock options and warrants based on the
     estimated fair value of the stock..............           --              --             --
  Incremental common shares applicable to
     acquisitions and the Other Equity
     transactions...................................      530,958         530,958        530,958
  Incremental common shares applicable to shares
     issued in connection with the Offering.........   31,000,000      31,000,000     31,000,000
                                                      -----------     -----------    -----------
  Pro forma weighted average common shares..........   77,661,870      77,661,870     77,661,870
                                                      ===========     ===========    ===========
  Pro forma basic and diluted loss per common
     share..........................................  $     (1.30)    $     (0.31)   $     (0.59)
                                                      ===========     ===========    ===========
</TABLE>
    
 
---------------
 
   
(1) Pro forma earnings per share of common stock is based on the weighted
    average number of shares of common stock equivalents outstanding during the
    period as adjusted for the one for ten reverse stock split.
    
 
   
(2) Weighted average common shares outstanding is based upon the common shares
    outstanding as of March 31, 1998. As the common stock was issued within the
    past year in connection with certain transactions, it has been reported as
    outstanding for all periods.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      15,586,196
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  440,566
<ALLOWANCES>                                    21,935
<INVENTORY>                                     53,576
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,080,395
<PP&E>                                       5,342,253
<DEPRECIATION>                                 261,254
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,475,126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          692,024
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 22,920,000
<COMMON>                                           883
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,137,781)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,475,126
<SALES>                                        759,480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               759,480
<CGS>                                          194,916
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,236,460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,575
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (275,511)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (275,511)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (275,511)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>
Order entered June 30, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00369-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.D.R. AND D.J., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-18-04007-R

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this accelerated termination of parental rights appeal 

is overdue. Because these types of appeals must be handled expeditiously, we 

ORDER Stacy Harlow, Official Court Reporter for the 254th Judicial District 

Court, to file the reporter’s record within FIVE DAYS of the date of this order. In 

the event Ms. Harlow did not record the proceedings in this case, we order her to

provide the Court, within THREE DAYS of the date of this order, with the name 

and contact information for the court reporter who recorded the proceedings. 

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this order to:
Honorable Kimberly Brown

Presiding Judge

254th Judicial District Court

Stacy Harlow

Official Court Reporter

254th Judicial District Court

All parties

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0459

_____________________________

FICKLING AND COMPANY, INC.,

and NGI ACQUISITIONS, LLC,

Appellants/Cross-Appellees,

v.

WEST SHORE LEGACY, LLC, and 

ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA,

Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Division of Administrative Hearings.

Suzanne Van Wyk, Administrative Law Judge.

May 31, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and BILBREY and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

D. Kent Safriet and Joshua E. Pratt of Holtzman Vogel Baran 

Torchinsky & Josefiak, PLLC, Tallahassee; Patrice Boyes of 

Patrice Boyes, P.A., Gainesville, for Appellants/Cross-Appellees.

Robert N. Clarke, Jr., Martin B. Sipple, and Magdalena Ozarowski 

of Ausley & McMullen, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellee/CrossAppellant West Shore Legacy, LLC.
GLP No. 3
GARE OF STATE STANDARDS

State standards must be handled as primary standards whose integrity must
be maintained and which must be protected at all times by an adequate chain of
custody. Storage space for standards should be provided which is locked to
prevent their unauthorized use and which is constructed to protect them from
adverse environmental damage.

All standards should be properly stored at all times. Mass standards (30
kg and 50 1b) and smaller should be stored in their cases or in cabinets. They
should not be left out when not in use, such as over-night. The 500-pound
stainless steel and similar standards should be covered with plastic or stored
in wood cases to protect them from dust and dirt in the air, and they should
rest on a clean pad or blocks. All mass standards are to be placed on suitable
pads to avoid abrading the bottoms.

Mass standards should never be handled with bare hands. Lifting tools, or
clean gloves or cloths are always to be used. If the weights should become
soiled, proper cleaning methods are to be used. Ordinarily, this will involve
dusting with a camel-hair brush. If standards appear to be visibly dirty, or
if there is reason to suspect contamination by dirt, the cleaning procedures
described in GMP 5 or GMP 6 should be followed.

Standards, such as volumetric pipets, should be clamped securely in their
holding brackets. They should be protected from physical damage as well as
from dust and dirt, to the extent possible.

GLP 3-1
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly report of Patriot Scientific Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to Rule 13a–14(b) or Rule 15d–14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: January 14, 2011


/s/ Clifford L. Flowers

Clifford L. Flowers

Interim Chief Executive Officer

and Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Patriot Scientific Corporation and will be retained by Patriot Scientific Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This Certification is being furnished pursuant to Rule 15(d) and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This Certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
9895.

#### Duncan *v.*State of Georgia.

Decided July 17, 1919.

Condemnation under liquor law—intervention; from Gwinnett superior court—Judge Cobb. May 4, 1918.

*G. F. Kelley,*for plaintiff in error.

Luke, J.

1. Under the ruling of the Supreme Court in the *ease oí Duncan*v. *State,*149 *Ga.*195 (99 S. E. 612), that where a third person interposes a claim to a vehicle seized under the act of 1917 (Pamph. Act, Ex. Sess. 1917, p. 16) providing for the forfeiture of any vehicle in which spirituous liquors are carried on any public road or private way in this State, “the general rule is that the verdict of acquittal [of the defendant], though based on the same transaction, is inadmissible” in favor of the claimant, the court in this case did not err in refusing to admit in evidence the indictment against the defendant and the verdict of not guilty thereon.

2. The grounds of the motion for a new trial not dealt with above are without substantial merit.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, G. J., and Jenhins, J., concur.*
10959.

#### McVay Brothers *v.*Dodd, trustee.

Decided March 2, 1920.

Motion to dismiss writ of error.

*O. A. Weddington,*for plaintiff in error. *H. F.*Lawson, contra.

Bloodwoeth, J.

This case was tried on the 15th of July, and it affirmatively appears from the bill of exceptions that it was not presented to the judge until the 15th of September, more than sixty days from the date of the trial. The motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions must be sustained. Civil Code (1910), § 6152; *Jones*v. *State,*146 *Ga.*8 (90 S. E. 280).

*Bill of exceptions dismissed.*

*Broyles, O. J., and*Lulce, *J., concur.*
Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATION

Re:	Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust 2004-SD2, Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2004-SD2, issued pursuant to the Pooling Agreement, dated
as of June 1, 2004, among Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc., as depositor (the
"Depositor"), Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Inc., as seller (the "Seller")
and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as custodian and as trustee (in such
capacity, the "Trustee").

I, Craig Phillips, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K ("Annual Report"), and
all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports
(collectively with this Annual Report, the "Reports") filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this Annual Report of the Depositor
relating to the above-referenced trust and series of certificates;

2.	Based on my knowledge, the information in the Reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this Annual Report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the Trustee by (i) the servicer under the Servicing
Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2004 (the "Bank of America Servicing Agreement"),
 among the Depositor, the Trustee and Bank of America, N.A., as servicer (in
such capacity, a "Servicer"), (ii) the servicer under the Servicing Agreement,
dated as of June 1, 2004 (the "WAMU Servicing Agreement"), among the
Depositor, the Trustee and Washington Mutual Bank FA, as servicer (in such
capacity, a "Servicer"), and (iii) the servicer under the Servicing Agreement,
dated as of June 1, 2004 (together with the Bank of America Servicing
Agreement and the WAMU Servicing Agreement, the "Servicing Agreements"),
among the Depositor, the Trustee and Wilshire Credit Corporation, as
servicer (in such capacity, a "Servicer"), for inclusion in the Reports is
included in these Reports;

4.	I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by each
Servicer under the related Servicing Agreement and based upon my knowledge
and the annual compliance review required by each such Servicing Agreement
and except as disclosed in the Reports, each Servicer has fulfilled its
obligations under the related Servicing Agreement; and

5.	The Reports disclose all deficiencies relating to each Servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
or similar procedure, as set forth in the Servicing Agreement, that is
included in the Reports.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: the Trustee and each
of the Servicers.
Date: March 24, 2005
/s/: Craig Phillips
Signature: Craig Phillips
Title: President