alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-08-0161-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	MAY 27, 2008

	______________________________

	CHARLOTTE WELCH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS

	REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF L.V. WELCH, APPELLANT

	V.

	PINNACLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 415TH DISTRICT COURT OF PARKER COUNTY;

	NO. CV-05-1676; HONORABLE GRAHAM QUISENBERRY, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellant, Charlotte Welch, perfected an appeal from the trial court’s summary judgment.  Welch has now filed a motion to dismiss her appeal and has conformed to the requirements of Rule 10.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.  This disposition is authorized by Rule 42.1(a)(1) and 43.2(f) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.  Finding the motion complies with the requirements of Rules 10.1 and 42.1(a), we dismiss the appeal.  Further, the court will tax costs against Welch.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

	Having disposed of this appeal at Welch’s request, we will not entertain a motion for rehearing and our mandate shall issue forthwith.

						Per Curiam
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000175

12-JAN-2018

09:02 AM
#### E. T. White *v.*W. G. Ferguson.

Appeal — Judgment of Court of Appeals — Mandate.

A judgment rendered t>y the Court of Appeals affirming the judgment of the circuit court and awarding damages upon the amount of a judgment superseded, is in effect a mandate directing the court helow to award damages upon the amount of the judgment.

*200Courts — ¡-Affirmance of Appeal — Effect.

TViiere the Court of Appeals affirmed a judgment of the circuit court awarding damages, the lower court has no power to investigate the question whether the judgment is erroneous.

APPEAL FROM DAVIESS- CIRCUIT COURT.

December 11, 1872.

*Weir, for appellants.*

*Sweeney, Stuart, for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

■ The court properly refused to hear the motion to set aside the judgment upon the ground that no supersedeas- was issued.

A judgment had been, rendered by this court affirming the judgment of the Daviess court and awarding damages upon the amount of the judgment superseded.

This was in substance and effect a mandate front this court directing the court below to award damages for the amount of the judgment. A supersedeas might have been issued from this court, and even if the judge below had been satisfied that no supersedeas had been issued by the clerk of the Daviess court he still had no right to infer front that fact that no such writ had issued in this court.

Nor does it appear any where in the record that no writ had issued froml thi-s court, and if it had, a judgment had been rendered, awarding damages, and the court below had no power to investigate the question as to whether that judgment was or was not erroneous.

The mandate was imperative and the only remedy the appellant had was by motion in this court to correct the judgment.

The judgment of the court below is therefore *affirmed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,491
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           7,688
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   764
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                13,169
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     43,713
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          14,702
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            14,768
<LOANS>                                        220,499
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,579
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 320,031
<DEPOSITS>                                     285,672
<SHORT-TERM>                                     9,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,599
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           845
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,915
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 320,031
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,591
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,125
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    91
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,807
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,163
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,173
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,634
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (138)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,297
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    938
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         587
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       587
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.82
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,861
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 4,854
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,613
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      (37)
<RECOVERIES>                                         3
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,579
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,579
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 24





                MERCANTILE BANKSHARES CORPORATION
                        POWER OF ATTORNEY




     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned Directors of
MERCANTILE BANKSHARES CORPORATION, a Maryland Corporation, hereby constitute
and appoint H. FURLONG BALDWIN and EDWARD K. DUNN, JR., or either of them
acting alone, the true and lawful agents and attorneys in fact of the
undersigned in each case with full power and authority in either of said
agents and attorneys in fact, to sign for the undersigned and in their
respective names as Directors of the Corporation the Annual Report of the
Corporation to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year 1995, on
Form 10-K, filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
any amendment or amendments to such Form 10-K hereby ratifying and confirming
all acts taken by such agents and attorneys in fact, or either of them, as
herein authorized.

Date:          March 12, 1996



/s/ William J. McCarthy  Director  /s/ George L. Bunting, Jr. Director
William J. McCarthy                  George L. Bunting, Jr.


/s/ Richard O. Berndt    Director  /s/ Morris W. Offit Director
Richard O. Berndt                      Morris W. Offit


/s/ Thomas M. Bancroft, Jr. Director  /s/ William C. Richardson Director
Thomas M. Bancroft,Jr.                    William C. Richardson


/s/ B. Larry Jenkins   Director    /s/ Robert D. Kunisch  Director
B. Larry Jenkins                         Robert D. Kunisch


/s/ Bishop L. Robinson Director    /s/ Christian H. Poindexter Director
Bishop L. Robinson                       Christian H. Poindexter


/s/ Donald J. Shepard   Director                            Director
Donald J. Shepard


/s/ Martin L. Grass     Director                            Director
Martin L. Grass


/s/ Calman J. Zamoiski, Jr.  Director                       Director
Calman J. Zamoiski, Jr.


/s/ James A. Block      Director                            Director
James A. Block


/s/ Brian B. Topping    Director                            Director
Brian B. Topping
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

# TIME AND DATE:

 3:30 p.m., Thursday, December 4, 2014.

# PLACE:

 NeighborWorks America—Gramlich Boardroom, 999 North Capitol Street NE., Washington, DC 20002.

# STATUS:

 Open (with the exception of Executive Session).

# CONTACT PERSON:

                         Jeffrey Bryson, General Counsel/Secretary, (202) 760-4101;                         *jbryson@nw.org*.                    

# AGENDA:

I. Call to Order

II. Recognition of Carol Galante

III. Approval of Minutes

IV. Executive Session: CEO Search Update

V. Executive Session: Transition Update

VI. Executive Session: Bank of America Settlement Update

VII. Executive Session: Corporate Administration Committee Update Items

VIII. Board Appointments

IX. Sustainable Homeownership Project Phase 2 Extension

X. Success Measures Data Systems Approval

XI. Board Meetings Scheduling

XII. Organizational Underwriting & Grants to Network

XIII. New Strategic Plan

XIV. Financial & Audit Update

XV. Management Updates

XIV. Adjourment

Jeffrey T. Bryson,

EVP & General Counsel/Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2014-28262 Filed 11-25-14; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7570-02-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7293

STEPHEN A. SHARP, Petitioner - Appellant, versus CHARLES E. THOMPSON; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-409-AM) Submitted: March 9, 1999 Decided: May 14, 1999 Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stephen A. Sharp, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel John Munroe, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant Stephen A. Sharp seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Sharp v. Thompson , No. CA-97-409-AM (E.D. Va. July 24, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Frank M. Looney *v.*Fred Hauck and Wife.

Covenants — Instruction—Lien.

In an action for breach of covenant against tbe incumbrance, the court should by instruction direct the inquiry of the jury to the fact whether there was a lien on the identical property covered by the deed when the conveyance was made, the amount thereof, and a statement as a matter of law whether the deed contained a covenant of general warrant.

APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT.

December 17, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

By Instruction No. 1, given on mlotion of appellees, the jury is authorized to find for them! whether they believe there were any taxes due on the property conveyed by appellants to Schuster or not; but if they believe that Frank. W. Looney conveyed “certain” or any property, to Schuster, and the conveyance was with general warranty, without identifying the property, it leaves the jury to determine whether the covenant in the deed was for a general warranty or not.

*224
      *Walker, for appellant.*

*Marshall, Joseph, for appellees.*

Again from the language of the instruction the jury were authorized to find for appellees if there was any incumbrance on the property, no difference how small, nor for what nor when accrued.

The instruction should have directed the inquiry of the jury to the facts as to whether there was a lien on the identical property covered by the deed of appellants to Schuster when said conveyance was made, the amount thereof and told them as matter of law whether the deed contained a covenant of general warranty or not.

No other error is perceived; but for the error indicated the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions to award a new. trial and for further proceedings consistent herewith.
As of January 2024

K12 CYBERSECURITY EDUCATION COMMUNITY OF INTEREST

2024 MEETING SCHEDULE

Meeting times will take place the second Thursday of each month from 3:30-4:30 

PM Eastern Time to serve members from different time zones. 

January 11, 2024 Thurs.

February 9, 2024 Thurs.

March 8, 2024 Thurs.

April 13, 2024 Thurs

May 10, 2024 Thurs.

June 8, 2024 Thurs. (Potential change due to NICE Conference)

July 12, 2024 Thurs.

August 10, 2024 Thurs.

September 13, 2024 Thurs.

October 12, 2024 Thurs

November 8, 2024 Thurs.

December 2024 Meeting to be held during the NICE K12 Cybersecurity 

Education Conference

All meetings will be held through Microsoft Teams, unless otherwise indicated. 

If you are a new member, please add a meeting hold to your calendar for each 

meeting. New members will receive the official calendar invite from the NICE 

Program Office one week prior to the meeting date.
CONTACT 

Technology Partnerships Office (TPO) 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899 

TPO@NIST.GOV 

Benefits

Bottom-up gold electrodeposition for 

high aspect ratio features in imaging 

applications Patent 10,889,908

Description 

Problem: 

Gold filling by conventional 

electrodeposition processes 

will deposit substantially on 

the field around the features 

of interest. This results in 

extended post-deposition 

processing to remove the 

extra material, waste of 

deposited gold and more 

rapid depletion of electrolyte. 

Invention: 

A process for filling trenches 

with gold from the bottom 

permitting seam-free and 

void-free filling. Leaves 

minimal undesired deposits, 

little waste, and reduction in 

post-deposition processing 

time.

Commercial Applications:

- X-ray interferometry

- X-ray phase contrast imaging

- X-ray wave-front-sensing

- Optics characterization

- Optics alignment

- Focus characterization at X-ray

free-electron lasers (XFELs)

- Biomedicine

- Materials Science

- Security

Competitive Advantages:

- Minimal deposits on the field

- Little waste of gold

- Reduction in post-deposition 

processing time.

- Void-free filled recessed feature with

- highly uniform filling profiles.

Also see patent 11,579,344 and

patent application 17/972,816
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4184 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4184

  To require United States assistance for the repair, maintenance, or 
    construction of the transportation infrastructure of Iraq to be 
   provided in the form of loans subject to repayment in full to the 
                       United States Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2004

Mr. Cummings (for himself and Ms. Corrine Brown of Florida) introduced 
      the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                        International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require United States assistance for the repair, maintenance, or 
    construction of the transportation infrastructure of Iraq to be 
   provided in the form of loans subject to repayment in full to the 
                       United States Government.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE FOR THE TRANSPORTATION 
              INFRASTRUCTURE OF IRAQ IN THE FORM OF LOANS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, amounts made available 
after the date of the enactment of this Act for the repair, 
maintenance, or construction of the transportation infrastructure of 
Iraq shall be provided in the form of loans subject to repayment in 
full to the United States Government.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

WESTERN DIVISION 

NICK GEORGEFF,

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 3:20-cv-50313

)

DON BORNEKE CONSTRUCTION, INC., ) Honorable Iain D. Johnston

)

Defendant. )

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

Pursuant to Local Rule 83.17 of the United States District Court for the Northern District 

of Illinois, Plaintiff NICK GEORGEFF, by his attorneys, Hetherington, Karpel & Bobber, LLC, 

respectfully requests that this Court grant Michael L. Teich of Hetherington, Karpel & Bobber, 

LLC, leave to withdraw his appearance as one of the attorneys of record in this matter. In support 

of this motion, Plaintiff states as follows: 

1. Michael L. Teich has been one of the attorneys of record for Plaintiff.

2. Mr. Teich recently left the firm of Anesi, Ozmon, Rodin, Novak & Kohen, Ltd. and 

joined the firm Hetherington, Karpel & Bobber, LLC.

3. At the request of Plaintiff, he will continue to be represented by counsel from Anesi, 

Ozmon, Rodin, Novak & Kohen, Ltd. and Michael L. Teich and Hetherington, Karpel & Bobber, 

LLC, are to be withdrawn as counsel in this case.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grant Michael L. Teich leave 

to withdraw as one of the attorneys of record in this action. 

Case: 3:20-cv-50313 Document #: 19 Filed: 10/29/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:52
Respectfully submitted, 

Hetherington, Karpel & Bobber, LLC

By: /s/Michael L. Teich 

Michael L. Teich #6216938

Hetherington, Karpel & Bobber, LLC

Attorneys for Plaintiff

120 North LaSalle Street

Suite 2810

Chicago, Illinois 60602

(312) 878-6680

Case: 3:20-cv-50313 Document #: 19 Filed: 10/29/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:53
IB 

Union Calendar No. 305 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4012 

[Report No. 108–527] 

To amend the District of Columbia College Access Act of 1999 to permanently 

authorize the public school and private school tuition assistance programs 

established under the Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2004 

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia (for himself and Ms. NORTON) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

JUNE 8, 2004 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To amend the District of Columbia College Access Act of 

1999 to permanently authorize the public school and 

private school tuition assistance programs established 

under the Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4012 RH 

1 SECTION 1. PERMANENT AUTHORIZATION OF TUITION AS2 SISTANCE PROGRAMS. 

3 (a) PUBLIC SCHOOL PROGRAM.—Section 3(i) of the 

4 District of Columbia College Access Act of 1999 (sec. 

5 38—2702(i), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking 

6 ‘‘each of the five succeeding fiscal years’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘each succeeding fiscal year’’. 

8 (b) PRIVATE SCHOOL PROGRAM.—Section 5(f) of 

9 such Act (sec. 38—2704(f), D.C. Official Code) is amend10 ed by striking ‘‘each of the five succeeding fiscal years’’ 

11 and inserting ‘‘each succeeding fiscal year’’. 

Union Calendar No. 305 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4012 

[Report No. 108–527] 

A BILL 

To amend the District of Columbia College Access 

grams established under the Act. school and private school tuition assistance proAct of 1999 to permanently authorize the public 

JUNE 8, 2004 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
##### 



EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IEA Income Fund IX, L.P. (the
Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the
undersigned, Dennis J. Tietz, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
Cronos Capital Corp., the General Partner of the Registrant, and John Kallas,
the Chief Financial Officer of Cronos Capital Corp., certify, based on their
knowledge, that:



| | (i)             |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and                                 
| | --------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii)            |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of the Registrant.
|
| | August 12, 2003

| |  |  |    |  |                                                                                                                                     
| |  |  | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  | By |  | /s/ Dennis J. TietzDennis J. Tietz, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Cronos Capital Corp.,
General Partner of the Registrant
|
| |  |  |    |  | /s/ John KallasJohn Kallas, Chief Financial Officer of Cronos
Capital Corp., General Partner of the Registrant                      

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.



---

|* |  | This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, other than as required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be
filed with the Commission or subject to the rules and regulations
promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------