alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

I, Anthony E. Applebaum, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mera
      Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this quarterly report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
      material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
      flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      quarterly report;

4.    The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
      have:

      d)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
            material information relating to the Company, including its
            consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
            those entities, particularly during the period in which this
            quarterly report is being prepared;

      e)    evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
            procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
            this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      f)    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
            effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
            evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.    The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee
      of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
      functions):

      c)    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
            controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
            identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in
            internal controls; and

      d)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
            other employees who have a significant role in the Company's
            internal controls; and

6.    The Company's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
      quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal
      controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
      controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including
      any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
      material weaknesses.

Date: June 18, 2005


/s/ ANTHONY E. APPLEBAUM
------------------------------------------
Anthony E. Applebaum
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
10331.

#### Odum *v.*The State.

Decided October 14, 1919.

Indictment for seduction; from Bacon superior court—Judge Summerall. November 18, 1918.

*J. Mark Wilcox,*for plaintiff in error.

*A. B. Spence, solicitor-general, M. B. Dickerson,*contra.

Luke, J.

*(a)*“Newly-discovered evidence which is merely cumulative or impeaching in its character will not constitute a good ground of a motion for a.new trial.”

(6) “Though the witness sought to be impeached by newly discovered evidence was the only witness against the prisoner upon a vital point in the ease, if the sole effect of the evidence would be to impeach the witness, a new trial will not be granted.”

(c) “Whether an extraordinary motion, based upon the ground of newly discovered testimony, should be granted or refused rests largely in the sound discretion of the court.”

The only effect of the alleged newly-discovered evidence in this case would be to impeach the chief witness for the State and show that she was not a virtuous woman. This was a matter in issue when the case ivas tried by the jury. The alleged newly-discovered evidence is both impeaching and cumulative, and under the above rulings this court cannot say that the trial judge abused his discretion in overruling the extraordinary motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Broyles, *O. J., and Lulce, J., concur.*
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 60430 Summary Calendar

**Gustavo Javier Rios**

**- Aguilar,** 

Petitioner **,**

versus
**Merrick Garland,** U.S. Attorney General **,** Respondent

**.**

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A207 006 049

Before **Smith, Stewart,** and **Graves,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  * Gustavo Javier Ríos

- Aguilar, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions this court for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing an appeal from an order of the immigration judge

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 13, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-60430 Document: 00516166666 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/13/2022No. 21

- 60430

2 (IJ) denying his application for withholding of removal and protection under the Conventi on Against Torture (CAT). Relying on Pereira v. Sessions , 138 S. Ct. 2105 (2018), and Niz

- Chavez v. Garland , 141 S. Ct. 1474 (2021), Ríos

- Aguilar first contends that, because his Notice to Appear did not provide the date and time of his initial immigration hearing, it was “defective” or “invalid.” Because Ríos

- Aguilar did not present this claim to the BIA, we lack jurisdiction to review it. See Omari v. Holder , 56 2 F.3d 314, 318 (5th Cir. 2009); Wang v. Ashcroft , 260 F.3d 448, 452 (5th Cir. 2001). With respect to any purported challenge to the BIA’s dismissal of his application for withholding of removal, we lack jurisdiction to consider Ríos

Aguilar’s contention that he was persecuted on account of his membership in a particular social group becaus e he did not present this claim to the BIA.
See Omari , 56 2 F.3d at 318; Wang , 260 F.3d at 452. Otherwise, b y failing to directly address the reasons that the BIA articulated for upholding the IJ’s denial of his application for withholding of removal, by failing to identify any error in the BIA’s analysis, and by failing to adequately cite the record or caselaw in support of his petition, Ríos

- Aguilar has abandoned any challenge to the BIA’s dismissal of his appeal. See Soadjede v. Ashcroft , 324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th Cir. 2003) . Furthermore, Ríos

- Aguilar has abandoned for failure to brief any challenge to the BIA’s determination that he waived any claim for protection under the CAT. See id.

Ríos

- Aguilar’s petition for review is **DENIED IN PART** and
**DISMISSED IN PART**  for lack of jurisdiction. Case: 21-60430 Document: 00516166666 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/13/2022
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony E. Applebaum, Chief Executive Officer of Mera Pharmaceuticals, certify that (1) Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.s Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 3 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|Date:  Sept. 5, 2008                      
|                                          
|/s/ANTHONY E. APPLEBAUM                   
|Anthony E. Applebaum                      
|Principal Financial and Accounting Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO . A

- 3800

- 17T4

HENRY.GROVE DIVERSIFIED

INVESTMENTS, LLP,

Petitioner

- Appellant,

v.

STATE OF NEW JERSEY,

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY

AFFAIRS, LOCAL FINANCE

BOARD,

Respondent s

- Respondent s

.

___________________________

Submitted May 30, 2019

– Decided June 19, 2019

Before Judges Simonelli, Whipple and Firko.

On appeal from the New Jersey Department of

Community Affairs , Local Finance Board.

Goldenberg, Mackler, Sayegh, Mintz, Pfeffer, Bonchi

& Gill, attorneys for appellant ( K eith A. Bonchi, of

counsel and on the brief; Elliott J. Almanza, on the

brief). NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the

internet

, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36

- 3.2 A

- 3800

- 17T4 Gurbir S. Grewal, Attorney General, attorney for

resp ondent s State of New Jersey, Department of

Community Affairs, Local Finance Board (M elissa H.

Raksa, Assistant Attorney G eneral, of counsel; Susan

M. Scott and Jonathan S. Sussman, Deputy Attorney s

General

, on the brief).

McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC, attorneys for

respondent City of Bridgeton ( William W. Northgrave

and Ted Del Guercio, III, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

T his matter has been amicably adjusted and the parties have stipulated to

the dismissal of this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.
CERTIFICATIONS
                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

I, Gregory F. Kowal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mera Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the Company, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
          procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of
Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
          the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
          and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
          controls; and

     6.   The Company's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
          quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal
          controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
          controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
          including any corrective actions with regard to significant
          deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:   March 13, 2006
/s/Gregory F. Kowal
----------------------
Gregory F. Kowal
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.4


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this post-effective amendment No. 1 on Form S-8, to be filed on or
around September 14, 1998, of our report dated January 31, 1996, on the
Consolidated Financial Statements of UUNET Technologies, Inc. included in
WorldCom, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 25, 1996, as amended by
Form 8-K/A filed on November 4, 1996, and to all references to our Firm included
in this registration statement.


                                          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Washington, D.C., 
September 14, 1998.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    Exhibit 23.4





               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants



American Realty Trust, Inc.
  Dallas, Texas

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting a part of this Registration Statement of our report dated March 12,
1998, relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of
Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. appearing in the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.





                                                 /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

Dallas, Texas
May 13, 1998
V 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4408

For the relief of Jen-Hui Tsai. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2004

Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Jen-Hui Tsai.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR JEN-HUI 

4 TSAI. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Jen-Hui Tsai shall be eligible for issuance of an im8 migrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien 

9 lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an 

10 application for issuance of an immigrant visa under sec11 tion 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful 

12 permanent resident. 
2

•HR 4408 IH 

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Jen-Hui Tsai en2 ters the United States before the filing deadline specified 

3 in subsection (c), she shall be considered to have entered 

4 and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be 

5 eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the 

6 Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the en7 actment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Jen-Hui Tsai, the Secretary of State shall in16 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 

17 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi18 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun19 try of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immi20 gration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total 

21 number of immigrant visas that are made available to na22 tives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 
3

•HR 4408 IH 

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Jen-Hui Tsai shall not, 

2 by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, privi3 lege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Æ
Exhibit 10.1

                             MADMAN MINING CO. LTD.

                                  I N V O I C E

                                   2005 - 114
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TO: Mr. Kristian Kostovski                DATE: April 30, 2005
    Suite 256, 1917 West 4th Ave
    Vancouver, BC, Canada  V6J 1M7        RE: Purchase of  One Gun Mineral Claim

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TO THE PURCHASE OF: A 100% interest in
the One Gun mineral claim (BCDM tenure
number 509734) located in the Cranberry
Ridge/Tuzo Creek area of the Greenwood
Mining Division, BC.

FUNDS ARE STATED IN CANADIAN DOLLARS

Total  purchase  price for a 100% interest in the
One Gun Mineral Claim                                               $10,000.00


TOTAL THIS INVOICE                                                  $10,000.00
                                                                    ==========



 Suite 604, 700 West Pender Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6C 1G8
                    Tel: (604) 970-0854 * Fax: (604) 669-9626
                          e-mail: madmanmining@aol.com
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joerg H. Klaube, the Chief Financial Officer of Magnitude Information
Systems, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Magnitude Information
Systems, Inc. (the "Company");

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and we have:

      (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      (c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and to the audit committee of
Company's board of directors:

      (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls; and

6. The Company's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated: May 12, 2004                     By:   /s/ Joerg H. Klaube
                                            ------------------------------------
                                              Joerg H. Klaube
                                              Chief Financial Officer
FILED

February 5, 1999

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

RICHARD CAPANYOLA, )

) C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9811-CC-00472

Appellant, )

) WAYNE COUNTY

VS. ) (No. 11561 Below)

)

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) The Hon. Robert Holloway

)

Appellee. ) (Dismissal of Habeas Corpus Petition)

) AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 20

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court upon the state's motion to affirm the judgment

of the trial court pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. After

reviewing the state’s motion, the appellant’s brief, and the record on appeal, the Court finds

that this is an appropriate matter for affirmance under Rule 20.

The petitioner is appealing the trial court's denial of his petition for writ of

habeas corpus. In January of 1994, the petitioner was indicted on two counts of rape of

a child under the age of 13. Subsequently, the petitioner pled guilty to two counts of

aggravated rape. The petitioner contends that the judgment entered against him is void

because the indictment failed to allege the mens rea of the offense charged. He also

argues that because the culpable mental state was not included in the indictment, the trial

court was without jurisdiction to enter judgments of conviction.

While habeas corpus is a proper vehicle for seeking review of whether an

indictment is fatally defective, thus depriving the trial court of jurisdiction, Dykes v.

Compton, 978 S.W.2d 528, 529 (Tenn. 1998), the petitioner in the present case is not

entitled to relief based on our Supreme Court’s opinions in State v. Hill, 954 S.W.2d 725

(Tenn. 1997), and Crittenden v. State, 978 S.W.2d 929, 930 (Tenn. 1998).

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the state’s motion to affirm the

judgment pursuant to Rule 20 is granted. The judgment of the trial court is hereby

affirmed. The petitioner being indigent, costs of this appeal are taxed to the state. IT IS
-2-

FURTHER ORDERED that the appellant’s request for appointment of counsel, which was

attached to his brief, is respectfully denied.

_____________________________

DAVID H. WELLES, JUDGE

CONCUR:

_____________________________

JOHN H. PEAY, JUDGE

_____________________________

THOMAS T. WOODALL, JUDGE