alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
9752.

#### Ransom *v.*The State.

Bloodworth, J.

1. In the motion for a new trial it is complained that the court erred in admitting in evidence certain dying declarations, the objections urged being that “there was not sufficient foundation laid for the admission of a dying statement, because the State has failed to prove that the deceased was in a dying condition and because the statement is hearsay.” There is no merit in the objection that “the state*365ment is hearsay.” That “dying declarations constitute one of the exceptions to the rule which rejects hearsay evidence” is clearly announced in *Mitchell*v. *State,*71 *Ga.*128 (2). The ground of objection, that “the State has failed to prove that the deceased was in a .dying condition,” is not complete. In order to ascertain what evidence was introduced in' connection with these declarations, and thus determine 'whether they are admissible, if is necessary to refer to the brief of evidence. “Under repeated rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court, a ground of a motion for a new trial must he complete in itself. When it is so incomplete as to require this court to refer to the pleadings or to the brief of the evidence, it will not be considered.” *Bridges*v. *Griffin,*20 *Ga. App.*599 (93 S. E. 1703. See also *Southern Ry. Co.*v. *Williams,*19 *Ga. App.*544 (4) (91 S. E. 1001), and cases cited. .

Decided February 1, 1919.

Conviction tor manslaughter; from Dooly superior court—Judge Crum. April *23, 1918.*

*John R. Cooper,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. B. Wall, solicitor-general, Jesse Grantham,*contra.

2. Under the qualifying notes of the trial judge, there is no merit in grounds 2 and 4 of the amendment to the motion for a new trial.

3. *No*error harmful to the defendant was committed in admitting in .evidence the testimony of Hattie King, complained of in the 3d special ground of the motion for a new trial.

4. When considered in the light of the entire charge of the court and of all the evidence, there is no error harmful ’to the defendant in the excerpts from the charge embodied in the 5th, 6th, 7th, 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th, and 15th grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial.

5. The evidence authorized the charge on voluntary manslaughter, and the court did not err in charging thereon as complained of in the 8th, 9th and 10th grounds of the motion for a new trial.

6. There is evidence to support the verdict, and the judgment is Affirmed.

*Broyles, P. J., and Stephens J., concur.*

Stephens, J.,

concurring specially.

Generally hearsay evidence is inadmissible. A ground of a motion for new trial which sets out the evidence admitted and alleges that its admission was excepted to “because the statement is hearsay” is, in my opinion, a complete ground within itself. This is not altered by the fact that such evidence may have been offered as a dying declaration and as an exception to the hearsay rule. None of the assignments of error being meritorious, I concur in the judgment of. affirmance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted
from the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         433,766
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,317,938
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,315,887
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,336,994
<PP&E>                                         222,697
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,301,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          278,878
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,067,530
<OTHER-SE>                                    (63,995)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,301,813
<SALES>                                        893,083
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                          492,171
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  441,680
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (32,988)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,345)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (26,643)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,643)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                              MAYTAG CORPORATION

                                  Exhibit 21

                    List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant

The following schedule lists the subsidiaries of Maytag Corporation, a Delaware
corporation, as of December 31, 2000.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     State or Country
Corporate Name                                       of Organization
--------------                                       ----------------
<S>                                                  <C>
Maytag Appliances Sales Company                        Delaware
Maytag Holdings, Inc.                                  Delaware
  Dixie-Narco, Inc.                                    Delaware
     Blodgett Holdings, Inc.                           Delaware
       G.S. Blodgett Corporation                       Vermont
         G.S. Blodgett International Limited           Barbados
         Pitco Frialator, Inc.                         New Hampshire
         Maytag Europe Limited                         England
         MagiKitch'n Inc.                              Pennsylvania
         Cloverleaf Properties, Inc.                   Vermont
Maytag Foreign Sales Corporation                       Virgin Islands
The Hoover Company                                     Delaware
  The Hoover Company (Sales)                           Delaware
  The Hoover Company (General, LLC)                    Delaware
  The Hoover Company (Limited, LLC)                    Delaware
    Hoover Company I LP                                Delaware
Maytag International, Inc.                             Delaware
  Maharashtra Investment, Inc.                         Delaware
  Hoover Mexicana S.A. de C.V.                         Mexico
    Jade Products Company                              Delaware
  Maytag Comercial, S.de R.L. de C.V.                  Mexico
  Maytag Servicios, S.de R.L. de C.V.                  Mexico
Hoover Holdings Inc.                                   Delaware
  Juver Industrial S.A. de C.V.                        Mexico
  Maytag Limited                                       Canada
  Maytag Australia Pty., Ltd.                          Australia
  Maytag Worldwide N.V.                                The Netherlands
                                                       Antilles
  AERA LIMITED                                         Hong Kong
  AERA (Hong Kong) PTE LTD                             Singapore
Maytag International Investments, Inc.                 Delaware
  Maytag I.I., Inc.                                    Delaware
    Maytag International Investments B.V.              Netherlands
      Hefei Rongshida Co. Ltd. (50.5%)                 China
        Chongqing General Washing Machine Factory      China
Anvil Technologies LLC (33.77%)                        Delaware
Maytag Capital Trust (2.91%)                           Delaware
Maytag Capital Trust II (2.91%)                        Delaware
</TABLE>

NOTE:  Ownership in subsidiaries is 100% unless otherwise indicated.

Other subsidiaries in the aggregate would not constitute a significant
subsidiary.
<PAGE>   1





                                   EXHIBIT 5

                        OPINION OF JACKSON WALKER L.L.P.
<PAGE>   2




                                 March 26, 1998

TCA Cable TV, Inc.
3015 SSE Loop 323
Tyler, Texas 75701

        Re:     Registration Statement on Form S-8 of TCA Cable TV, Inc.

Gentlemen:

         We are acting as counsel for TCA Cable TV, Inc., a Texas corporation
(the "Company"), in connection with the registration under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended (the "Act"), of the offering and sale of up to 150,000
shares of the Company's Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share (the "Shares"),
in respect of the TCA Cable 401(k) Plan (the "Plan").  A Registration Statement
on Form S-8 covering the offering and sale of the Shares (the "Registration
Statement") is expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Commission") on or about the date hereof.

         In reaching the conclusions expressed in this opinion, we have
examined and relied upon the originals or certified copies of all documents,
certificates and instruments as we have deemed necessary to the opinions
expressed herein, including the Company's Articles of Incorporation, as
amended, the Bylaws of the Company and a copy of the Plan.  In making the
foregoing examinations, we have assumed the genuineness of all signatures on
original documents, the authenticity of all documents submitted to us as
originals and the conformity to original documents of all copies submitted to
us.

         Based solely upon the foregoing, subject to the comments hereinafter
stated, and limited in all respects to the laws of the State of Texas  and the
federal laws of the United States of America, it is our opinion that the
Shares, when sold by the Company in respect of the Plan, will be validly
issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

         We hereby consent to the use of this opinion as Exhibit 5 to the
Registration Statement.  In giving this consent, we do not admit that we come
within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the
Act or the rules and regulations of the Commission promulgated thereunder.

                               Very truly yours,

                               /s/ Jackson Walker L.L.P.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                             SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DIMENSIONAL VISIONS INCORPORATED (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Preston J. Shea, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Preston J. Shea
-------------------
Preston J. Shea
President and Chief Accounting Officer



February 24, 2004
EXHIBIT 12

                         ORYX ENERGY COMPANY
            COMPUTATION OF CONSOLIDATED RATIO OF EARNINGS
         TO FIXED CHARGES AND EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND
        PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS - UNAUDITED (a)
                        (Millions of Dollars)
                                                  Three Months
                                                 Ended March 31
                                                      1998
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES:
Fixed Charges:
 Consolidated interest cost and debt expense          $ 27
 Interest allocable to rental expense (b)                1
                                                      ----
   Total                                              $ 28
                                                      ====
Earnings:
 Consolidated income before benefit from
   income taxes                                       $  2
 Fixed charges                                          28
 Interest capitalized                                   (5)
 Amortization of previously capitalized
   interest                                              1
                                                      ----
   Total                                              $ 26
                                                      ====
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (c)                 .93
                                                      ====
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED
  STOCK DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS:
Fixed Charges:
 Consolidated interest cost and debt expense          $ 27
 Preferred stock dividend requirements                   -
 Interest allocable to rental expense (b)                1
                                                      ----
   Total                                              $ 28
                                                      ====
Earnings:
 Consolidated income before benefit from
   income taxes                                       $  2
 Fixed charges                                          28
 Interest capitalized                                   (5)
 Amortization of previously capitalized interest         1
                                                      ----
   Total                                              $ 26
                                                      ====
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred 
  Stock Dividends (c)                                  .93
                                                      ====

(a)  The  consolidated financial statements of Oryx  Energy  Company
     include  the accounts of all subsidiaries (more than 50 percent
     owned and/or controlled).

(b)  Represents  one-third of total operating lease  rental  expense
     which is that portion deemed to be interest.

(c)  Earnings for the three months ended March 31 were inadequate to
     cover  fixed  charges  or  fixed charges  and  preferred  stock
     dividend requirements by $ 2 million.
William M. Pitts, Research Chemis

Building and Fire Research Labo

National Institute of Standards and Tec

U.S. Department of Commerce

wpitts@nist.gov

Federal Building and Fire Safety Inves

of the World Trade Center Disast

Visual Data Collection and A

June 22, 2004
Visual Collection and Time Line Deve

WTC 1, 2, and 7 

Purpose: To utilize photographs, vide

relevant information to devtime lines for the spread anfires at the peripheries of Center Buildings 1, 2, anorganize the information such utilized by other investimembers.
TEAM MEMBERS 

Leader: Bill Pitts

Professionals: Kathy Butler 

Lori Brassell 

NIST Expert: Val JunkerStudents: Josh Novesel Victor Ontivers

Rochelle Plummer José Sánchez Steven Schelick Laura Sugden Jonathan Demarest Brendan WilliamLisa Petersen Schuyler Ruitbe

Other Important Contributors: Doug Walton  Darren Lowe 

Bud Nelson 
TOPICS 

• Collection and Data Basing Status

• Fire Analysis Status• Response of WTC 2 to Plane Strike• Contributions to Other Investigation

Projects 
Status of Visual Material Collection 

Basing 

• Immense amount of material collected and timed

o 6,900 photographs catalogued (in excess of 

photographers represented) with 3,060 timed 

3 seconds or better.

o Approximately 150 hour of videotape digitize

(6,882 clips) from more than twenty individuaorganizations, and documentaries with 2,674 accuracy of 3 seconds or better.

• NIST is no longer actively seeking new visual ma

• NIST believes that the visual material in its posse

for the purposes of the Investigation.
Status of Fire Analysis for WTC 

• Time lines for window openings, smoke, and fire h

completed for WTC 1 and WTC 2

• Visual material for WTC 7 is insufficient to develop 

line, but it does provide an adequate description oand location up to collapse

• Fires in WTC 7 are observed on floors 7, 8, 9, 11, 

30 with rapid spread in the late afternoon

• Analysis of WTC 7 fires is continuing
KEY FOR TEST ANALY

Sheet #1: Fire Visible 

0 No fire 

3 Exte

1 Spot fire 

9 Not v

2 Fire visible inside

Sheet #2: Smoke 

0 No smoke evident 

2 “Hea

1 “Light smoke” 

9 Not v

Sheet #3: Windows 

0 Window open 1 Window in place 9 Not visible 

WTC 1

106 out of 

208

WTC 2

116 out of 

116


WTC 2 Deflection at 70 WTC 2 Deflection at 70th Floor
INTERACTIONS WITH OTHER PR

● Project #2: Baseline Structural Performance and Airc

 Analysis 

- Provide photos and videos - Estimate Aircraft Speeds - Characterize Exterior Damage - WTC 2 Motion Analysis 

● Project #3: Mechanical and Metallurgical Analysis of 

- Provide photos and videos 

● Project #4: Investigation of Active Fire Protection Sys

- Provide photos and videos 
INTERACTIONS WITH OTHER PRO

● Project #6: Structural Fire Response and Collapse Ana - Provide photos and videos of collapses of WTC 1,  - Identify particularly interesting visual material (e.g - Video Analysis ● Project #7: Occupant Behavior, Egress, and Emergen

 - Provide photos and videos ● Project #8: Fire Service Technologies and Guidelines  - Provide photos and videos
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Daniel P. Beharry, Chief Executive Officer of Mera Pharmaceuticals, certify
that (1) Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 3 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2003 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of Mera
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


                                               /S/  DANIEL P. BEHARRY
                                               ---  -----------------
                                               Daniel P. Beharry
                                               Chief Executive Officer

                                               March 21, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Mera
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.




                                       13
<PAGE>
DATE: January 9, 2008 

TO: All Interested Parties 

FROM: R. Michael McCabe 

SUBJECT: Upcoming Mobile ID Work Group Meeting 

The NIST Mobile ID work group was formed as a result of the NIST Mobile ID 

workshop held last September. The next meeting has been scheduled for March 5-6, 

2008 at NIST to continue the development of a minimum set of operational requirements 

for enrollment, identification, and verification functions using Mobile ID devices. 

During the November 29th meeting of the group, consensus was reached on various 

parameters for some basic levels of operation for fingerprint capture and transmission. 

At the March meeting the documentation of this work will be reviewed. Additional 

topics including image compression, record types to be used, and responses to be 

generated will also be discussed. As time permits, aspects relating to face and iris 

capture will be considered. Any issues or aspects of Mobile ID that you would like to 

have discussed during the meeting and placed on the agenda should be forwarded to me 

as soon as possible. 

Date: Wednesday-Thursday March 5-6, 2008 

Time: 9:00 am - 5:00 pm 

Place: NIST 

Building 224 Room B-245 

100 Bureau Drive 

Gaithersburg, MD 20899 

Directions and visitor information can be found here: 

http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/visitor/visitor.htm 

Cost: No Charge (Pre-registration is mandatory. Space is limited, so register soon) 

Hotel: 

Rooms are being reserved at the Gaithersburg Holiday Inn at a special rate of $113 plus 

13% tax through February 25, 2008. To register for rooms please call the hotel directly, 

301-948-8900 and request the Mobile ID meeting room block. Reservations should be 

made as soon as possible to take advantage of this rate. These rates will be effective for 

the nights of March 3, 4, 5, and 6. This is the hotel at 2 Montgomery Village Avenue and 

Route 355 (or Frederick Road). There is also a Courtyard and Marriott nearby. 

Registration: 

As this meeting will be held on the NIST campus, pre-registration is mandatory in order 

for our security unit to generate a visitor pass for each registrant. 

1 
 

If you plan to attend, please reply no later than Monday, February 25th (or sooner if 

possible). Space is limited. If you are: 

____ A US citizen, please email mobileid@nist.gov your full name, the name of your 

employer, and email address, and please state that you are a US citizen. 

____ Not a US citizen, please email mobileid@nist.gov as soon as possible with the 

following information: 

1. Full name 

2. Date of birth 

3. City of birth 

4. Country of birth 

5. Passport number 

6. Issuing country of passport 

7. Title/position 

8. Gender 

9. Employer/Sponsor 

10. Telephone number (work) 

11. Address (work) 

12. Country of Citizenship 

13. Countries of dual citizenship (if applicable) 

14. Country of Residence 

15. Are you a US Permanent Resident? 

If you are not currently a member of the Mobile ID ad hoc group but would like to join or 

need other information please contact mobileid@nist.gov. 

R. Michael McCabe 

ID Technology Partners (IDTP) 

mmccabe@idtp.com 

www.idtp.com 

301-865-9371 

2
10642.

#### Durham *v.*The State.

Decided October 10, 1919..

Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial in this case contains the usual general grounds only; there is some evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the judge who tried the ease, and this court will not interfere.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.*

*267Accusation of riot; from city court of Floyd county—Judge Nunnally. May 5, 1919.

*Harris & Harris,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. F. Kelly, solicitor,*contra.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony E. Applebaum, Chief Executive Officer of Mera Pharmaceuticals,
certify that (1) Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended October 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 3 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained
in the Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2003 fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations
of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


                                      /s/ Anthony E. Applebaum
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Anthony E. Applebaum
                                      Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

                                      June 21, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Mera
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.