alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dimensional Visions Incorporated
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jason M. Genet, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Jason M. Genet
-----------------------------
Jason M. Genet
Chief Executive Officer
November 13, 2002
exv10w9



 




Exhibit
10.9




THIRD AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT




     THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is entered into as
of the 27th day of October, 2005 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Patrick
Henry Associates, L.P. (“Seller”) and Columbia Equity Trust, Inc. (“Purchaser”).



RECITALS




     A. Seller and Purchaser entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of August 5, 2005,
as amended (collectively, the “Contract”), pursuant to which Seller agreed to sell to
Purchaser, and Purchaser agreed to buy from Seller the Property (as defined in the Contract).



     B. Seller and Purchaser have agreed to modify the terms of the Contract as set forth in this
Amendment.



     C. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them
in the Contract.



     NOW THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound, Seller and Purchaser agree as follows:



AGREEMENTS




     1. Seller and Purchaser acknowledge receipt from GMAC Commercial Mortgage of a letter dated
October 19, 2005 (the “GMAC Consent Letter”) consenting to the assumption by Purchaser of the
Existing Mortgage subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in the GMAC Consent Letter,
including approval of the assumption by the Special Servicer of the loan and the Directing
Certficateholder (collectively, the “Special Servicer/DC Approval”). Purchaser hereby agrees to
use commercially reasonable efforts to satisfy the conditions set forth in paragraphs 2, 5, 6, 7,
8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 of the GMAC Consent Letter which are within its control in a timely manner.
Seller and Purchaser hereby agree to extend the Outside Date to November 18, 2005 in order to
satisfy the other conditions set forth in the GMAC Consent Letter, including obtaining the Special
Servicer/DC Approval.



     2. Except as modified by this Amendment, all of the terms of the Contract shall remain
unchanged and in full force and effect.



 









 






     

     3. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts all of which together shall constitute one
and the same instrument.




     

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Seller and Purchaser have entered into this Amendment as of the date first
above stated.



    	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	SELLER: 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	PATRICK HENRY ASSOCIATES L.P.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	By: 	 	SAP IV Patrick Henry NF GP L.L.C.,	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	its sole general partner	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	By: 	 	SAP IV manager, Inc.,	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	its manager	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	By: 	 	/s/ Richard Wilpon	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	Its: 	 	Senior Executive Vice President	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	PURCHASER:	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	COLUMBIA EQUITY TRUST, INC.,

          a Maryland corporation	 	 
	
 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	By: 	 	 /s/ Clinton D. Fisch	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	Its: 	 	Director of Acquisitions	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 







2
Improving and 

Applying the Phase 

Segmentation of 

X-ray and Neutron 

Tomography

By: Cathy Yung

Mentored by Jacob LaManna, PhD
2

What is Tomography?

➝ The cross-sectional imaging of 

an object from many different 

directions/angles

➝ Used in medical field Computerized Tomography (CT) scan

Beam shoots light at 

rotating sample at the 

NCNR
3

Tomographic Imaging

➝ Reconstructing an image from its projections

Cross sections Sinogram Reconstructed Image

Beam light
4

X-ray and Neutron Tomography

➝ Non-destructive way to determine the internal and external 

structures of samples

Neutron X-Ray

➝ X-rays interact with an atom’s 

electron cloud

➝ Neutrons interact with atomic nuclei

➝ X-rays can detect denser 

materials such as metals

➝ Neutrons can detect lighter 

materials such as water and organic 

materials

Metal rod 

clearly 

seen

Polymer 

separator 

clearly 

seen
5

What is Segmentation? 

➝ Process of dividing an image into 

multiple sections based on certain 

shared characteristics

➝ Easier to analyze 

Neutron cross-section

X-ray cross-section

Polymer 

Separator
6

Segmented picture of battery

Polymer separator

Metal rod

Label
7

Motivations and Aims

1. Improve phase segmentation program to make more 

user-friendly

2. Investigate how to extract properties from 

segmented samples

3. Obtain a 3D model of the internal structure
8

Dual Histogram

➝ Polygons drawn are a 

rough estimate

➝ Lots of trial and error

➝ Hand-drawn

Contour Plotting

➝ Easier for user to follow

Vs.

Neutron attenuation value

X-ray attenuation value

X Bin Values

Y Bin Values
9

Optimizing the Contour Plots

➝ Peak caused from area around sample

➝ Specify specific levels for MATLAB to plot

➝ Find maximum and crop out

➝ Contourf vs. contour

➝ Best color scheme

Solutions:
10

Overlaying the Plots

➝ Started to align the x and y axes

➝ Users can use contour plots and 

histogram data 

➝ Reduces uncertainty in segmentation 

process

Woolly Mammoth Tooth

Neutron attenuation values

X-ray attenuation values

Original Dual Histogram
11

Using Dragonfly

➝ Defines Regions of Interest (ROIs)

➝ Learn about different properties 

Sand Column
Segment  extract mesh  save as .stl file  3d printing

12

Mayan Artifact
13

Summary

1. Determined that contour plots provide a viable option for improving 

the process of phase segmentation

2. Extracted various properties from sand column sample

3. Constructed 3D models that aid with understanding of sample

Future work could include machine learning
14

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to:

My mentor, Jacob LaManna

Victoria DiStefano

The other SHIP mentors Markus Bleuel, Heather Chen-Mayer, Brian Maranville, Ryan Need, William 

Ratcliff, and Wei Zhou

The NIST Center for Neutron Research SHIP Directors Julie Borchers, Joe Dura, and Yamali Hernandez

The National Institute for Standards and Technology, the Center for High Resolution Neutron Scattering, 

and the National Science Foundation
15
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                                     |         |                                                                              |
|------------------------------------------|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                April 13, 2007 |    | /s/    Raymond                J. De Hont                      |
|                                     |    | **Raymond                J. De Hont**                                             |
|                                     |    | **Chairman,                Chief Executive Officer and                President** |

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERIC JOSEPH FLOYD, also named as: Eric 

J Floyd, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

MACKENZIE, Correctional Officer (CO II) 

at Barchey Unit, Lewis Complex, aka per 

Doc 21 also known as Unknown McKenzie; 

FAGA, Unknown; Correctional Officer (CO 

II) at Barchey Unit, Lewis Complex; DAISY 

AKINWALE, Nurse at Barchey Unit, Lewis 

Complex; TRICIA PITTS, Nurse at Barchey 

Unit, Lewis Complex; BROGDEN, 

Unknown Graveyard Sgt. at Barchey Unit, 

Lewis Complex; CONN, Unknown Day Shift 

Sgt. at Barchey Unit, Lewis Complex, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 22-16011 

D.C. No. 

2:20-cv-02222-JJT-JFM 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

John Joseph Tuchi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 3, 2024**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 3 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 22-16011 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner Eric Joseph Floyd appeals pro se the district court’s 

summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that appellants violated 

his Eighth Amendment rights in connection with the use of leg restraints while 

escorting him to obtain medical treatment. We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Floyd’s claim 

against correctional officer MacKenzie because Floyd failed to raise a genuine 

dispute of material fact as to whether MacKenzie was deliberately indifferent to 

Floyd’s safety when she utilized leg shackling restraints when walking Floyd to the 

medical unit for treatment of his asthma. Keenan v. Hall, 83 F.3d 1083, 1089 (9th 

Cir. 1996) (granting summary judgment when shackling did not cause injury or 

discomfort beyond that inherent from movement in restraints).

We do not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal, including 

Floyd’s contention that the district court should have requested additional medical 

records. Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir 1999). Nor do we consider 

issues not specifically raised and argued in the opening brief. See id.

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT
      23.0**




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
      333-121336 and 333-130278 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 5, 2007,
      relating to the consolidated financial statements of Abington Community Bancorp,
      Inc. and subsidiaries, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
      Abington Community Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
      2006.





/s/
      BEARD
      MILLER COMPANY LLP





Beard
      Miller Company LLP


Harrisburg,
      Pennsylvania


March
      12,
      2007
#### The People v. James Jones.

*Autrefois acquit*— Discha/rge *of jury without verdict.*

A plea of former acquittal is *prima facie*sufficient if it shows that a jury-had been empanelled, and that the prosecution went into proofs by witnesses until they rested their case. This would entitle defendant to a verdict for or against him, and a discharge of the jury without a verdict would discharge the respondent unless there was some overruling necessity, and if there had been, it should be set up by ' replication to the plea.

Error to Schoolcraft.

Submitted and decided June 21.

Information for murder. Respondent brings error.

Reversed.

*William Faueett Riggs*for appellant.

Attorney General *Jaeob J. Van Riper*for the People confessed error.

*555Cooley, J.

The record in this case show an information, a plea of former acquittal in bar, a demurrer to the plea, the demurrer overruled, trial, conviction and sentence. The pica of former acquittal shows no verdict, but it shows that a jury was empanelled, and that the prosecution went into proofs by witnesses until they rested their case. Under all the authorities this entitled defendant to a verdict one way or the other, and if the jury was discharged without verdict and without any overruling necessity, this was a final discharge of the accused. If any reason existed that should give the discharge of the jury any different effect in the case, it should have been presented by replication. This was not done, but the prosecution left the case to stand upon the plea. As that was sufficient in substance, the judgment must be reversed and the prisoner discharged.

The other Justices concurred.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4291 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a boundary study to 

evaluate the significance of the Colonel James Barrett Farm in the 

Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the suitability and feasibility of 

its inclusion in the National Park System as part of the Minute Man 

National Historical Park, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2004 

Mr. MEEHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a boundary 

study to evaluate the significance of the Colonel James 

Barrett Farm in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts 

and the suitability and feasibility of its inclusion in the 

National Park System as part of the Minute Man National Historical Park, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT STUDY. 

4 (a) DEFINITIONS.—For the purposes of this Act: 

5 (1) BARRETT’S FARM.—The term ‘‘Barrett’s 

6 Farm’’ means the Colonel James Barrett Farm list-
2 

•HR 4291 IH 

1 ed on the National Register of Historic Places, in2 cluding the house and buildings on the approxi3 mately 6 acres of land in Concord, Massachusetts. 

4 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

5 the Secretary of the Interior. 

6 (b) STUDY.—Not later than 1 year after the date 

7 funds are made available, the Secretary shall conduct a 

8 boundary study to evaluate the significance of Barrett’s 

9 Farm in Concord, Massachusetts, as well as the suitability 

10 and feasibility of its inclusion in the National Park System 

11 as part of Minute Man National Historical Park. 

12 (c) CONTENT OF STUDY.—The study shall include an 

13 analysis of the following: 

14 (1) The significance of Barrett’s Farm in rela15 tion to the Revolutionary War. 

16 (2) Opportunities for public enjoyment of the 

17 site as part of the Minute Man National Historical 

18 Park. 

19 (3) Any operational and management issues 

20 that need to be considered if Barrett’s Farm were 

21 added to the Minute Man National Historical Park. 

22 (4) A determination of the feasibility of admin23 istering Barrett’s Farm considering its size, configu24 ration, ownership, costs, and other factors, as part 

25 of Minute Man National Historical Park. 
3 

•HR 4291 IH 

1 (5) An evaluation of the adequacy of other al2 ternatives for management and resource protection 

3 of Barrett’s Farm. 

4 (d) SUBMISSION OF REPORT.—Upon completion of 

5 the study, the Secretary shall submit a report on the find6 ings of the study to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

7 Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Resources 

8 of the House of Representatives. 

9 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

10 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums 

11 as may be necessary to carry out this Act. 

Æ
NVLAP is: 

–A system for accrediting laboratories found competent 

to perform specific tests or calibrations or types of 

tests or calibrations 

NVLAP is not: 

–A certifier of test data 

–A certifier of products 

–An operator of a certification program 
• A process for accreditation of testing and calibration 

laboratories 

• NIST manages NVLAP program 

• Based on ISO/IEC standard 17025 

• Fee supported program 
Independent, third party evaluation of a laboratory's 

technical competence. 

□Evaluation is based on a Standard 

□Evaluation of specific scope of accreditation 

□Evaluation by peer technical experts 

□Results in formal recognition 
NVLAP General Procedures and Requirements 

 General Information 

 Accrediting a Laboratory 

 Conditions and Criteria for Accreditation 

Sections 4 and 5 contain the managerial and technical 

requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005 

Supplement created for specific subject areas, i.e. 

Cryptography, and now Biometrics 

NVLAP Specific Biometric Testing Procedures and 

Requirements 

Defines “Scopes” of Accreditation – labs choose which Scopes 

they seek accreditation 

Initial publication Fall 2009 
30BTA 

Biometric Testing and Analysis 

30TT 

Technology Testing 

– Non-human/laboratory 

30CT 

Conformance 

Testing 

30TISCT

Technical Interface Standards Conf. Testing 

30DISCT

Data Interchange Standards Conf. Testing 

30OT

Operational Testing 

30UT

Usability Testing 

30IT 

Interoperability 

Testing 

30SIT

Sensor Interoperability Testing

30MTMIT

Modality-Specific Template/Matcher 

 Interoperability Testing 

30MMAPT

Modality-Specific Matcher Algorithm 

Performance Testing 

30ST 

Scenario Testing 

– Human crew (lab ) 

30SLT 

System Level Testing 

(enrollment / verification) 30CPST Conf. to Performance Specs. Testing 30GPT Graded Performance Testing 30PPT Pure Performance Testing 

30BSCT

Biometric Sample Collection Testing 

30SIT

Sensor Testing 

30SIQAT 

Sensor Image Quality Algorithm Testing 

30BIST

Biometric Image Segmentation Testing 

30DCST

Data Compression Software Testing
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James M. Seneff, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income  Fund V, Ltd.  (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  March 31, 2003 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:   May 12, 2003                       /s/ James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                           -------------------------------
                                           Name:  James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                           Title: Chief Executive Officer


                                           A  signed  original  of this  written
                                           statement required by Section 906 has
                                           been  provided  to CNL Income Fund V,
                                           Ltd.  and  will  be  retained  by CNL
                                           Income Fund V, Ltd. and  furnished to
                                           the     Securities    and    Exchange
                                           Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 237 (Wednesday, December 10, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 73245-73246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28453]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

7 CFR Part 15c

RIN 0503-AA57


Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Age in Programs or Activities 
Receiving Federal Financial Assistance From the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Agriculture.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) seeks to issue a 
Department-wide regulation to implement the Age Discrimination Act of 
1975, as amended (``Age Act''), and the Government-wide age 
discrimination regulation promulgated by the U.S. Department of Health 
and Human Services (HHS). The Age Act and HHS regulations prohibit age 
discrimination in programs and activities receiving Federal financial 
assistance. The proposed rule intends to ensure compliance with the Age 
Act and HHS regulations and provide

[[Page 73246]]

guidance to USDA agencies, employees, recipients, and beneficiaries on 
Age Act requirements. In the final rule section of this issue of the 
Federal Register, USDA is publishing this action as a direct final rule 
without prior proposal because USDA views this as a non-controversial 
action and expects no adverse comments. If no adverse comments are 
received in response to the direct final rule, no further action will 
be taken on this proposed rule, and the action will become effective at 
the time specified in the direct final rule. If USDA receives adverse 
comments, a timely document will be published withdrawing the direct 
final rule, and all public comments received will be addressed in a 
subsequent final rule based on this action.

DATES: Comments on this proposed action must be received by USDA or 
carry a postmark or equivalent no later than January 9, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit adverse comments on the proposed rule to Anna G. 
Stroman, Chief, Policy Division, by mail at Office of the Assistant 
Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, 
DC 20250. You may also submit adverse comments on the Federal 
eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anna Stroman at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e5848b8b84cb9691978a88848ba584968697cb90968184cb828a93"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cdaca3a3ace3beb9bfa2a0aca38dacbeaebfe3b8bea9ace3aaa2bb">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION in the direct 
final rule located in the Rules and Regulations section of this issue 
of the Federal Register.

    Dated: November 17, 2014.
Thomas J. Vilsack,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-28453 Filed 12-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>