alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Francis J. Barry v. Severen Peterson et al.

*Damages f<»’ throwing snow on another’s premises*— Barnes *dripping.*

An action lies for such, damages as are caused by snow thrown from one person’s premises upon those of another, although the damages maybe more consequential than direct.

But damages cannot be recovered on account of water dripping from ai house on adjacent premises without proof that it was caused by some neglect of duty on the part of the house owner. *Underwood Waldron*33 Mich. 239 affirmed.

*264Error to Midland.

Submitted Apr. 14.

Decided Apr. 25.

Case. Defendants bring error.

Reversed.

*Stanford d> Van Kleeolc*for appellants.

*Hemmgwa/y do Gordon*for appellee.

Campbell, J.

Plaintiff sued in a justice’s court to recover for injury caused to his building by rain dripping from defendants’ neighboring house, and by snow thrown between the buildings and on his land from the latter. The chief injury being consequential and not direct, we think there can be no objection to the form of action, which was case.

So far as the damage from snow is concerned there was proof that it was shovelled upon plaintiff’s land from defendants’ house by defendants’ order, and by their servant in the course of his service. We think there was no error in holding defendants liable for this.

But the court did not qualify the liability under all circumstances for the consequences of rain dripping from defendants’ roof, and held it was absolute. This liability does not exist unless it arises from some fault or neglect of duty, and it was so held in *Underwood v. Waldron*33 Mich. 239. Eor this error the judgment must be reversed and a new trial granted.

The other Justices concurred.
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, each of the undersigned officers of Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. (the company), hereby certifies, to such
officers knowledge, that the companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.







Date:  September 5, 2006







/s/    Fumio OhtsuboName:

Fumio OhtsuboTitle:

President and Director(Principal Executive Officer)/s/    Tetsuya KawakamiName:

Tetsuya KawakamiTitle:

Executive Vice President(Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





I, Lorie M. Guerrera, Chief Accounting Officer of Cordia Corporation (the Registrant) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the period June 30, 2004 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report):

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By:/s/ Lorie M. Guerrera





Lorie M. Guerrera



Chief Accounting Officer



March 10, 2005









*

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cordia Corporation and will be retained by Cordia Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
GENERAL ELECTION als
NOVEMBER 7, 2000

State of Maryland
Allegany County

0900

VOTE co

“| President and Vice President

S| of the United States | VOTE FOR ONE PAIR

ro)
AL GORE ()
Tennessee Democratic @ x
JOE LIEBERMAN
Connecticut
GEORGE W. BUSH
Texas :

Repub!

DICK CHENEY rues fF
Wyoming )
HARRY BROWNE 2)
Tennessee Libertarian @ | x
ART OLIVIER
California (2.
PAT BUCHANAN oh
Virginia Reform e x
EZOLA FOSTER
California (8)
RALPH NADER Gy)
Connecticut

2] WINONA LaDUK SH] | x

es Minnesota

ii | HOWARD PHILLIPS

6 | Virginia Constitution @

2 J. CURTIS a

S| Missouri

foe)

>

2 | Write-in e

oO

:

Z f= 7

=! United States S VOTE FOR ONE
PAUL S. SARBANES Democratic @ | xX
PAUL H. RAPPAPORT Republican @ | X
Write-in ® x

Representative in Congress
6th Congressional District VOTE FOR ONE

DONALD M. DeARMON Democratic @ | xX
ROSCOE G. BARTLETT Republican @ | X

Write-in @ |x
Judge of the Circuit Court

Judicial Circuit 4 VOTE FOR ONE
GARY G. LEASURE @| x
Write-in @| x

mMo01-16°4. -VOTE BOTH SIDES-

— — Serr

A
501.

t


BACK

OFFICIAL BALLOT A
GENERAL ELECTION
NOVEMBER 7, 2000

State of Maryland
Allegany County

VOTE BOTH SIDES

Judge, Court of Special VOTE YES OR NO

Appeals - At Large FOR EACH JUDGE
PETER B. KRAUSER YES @| x.
For Continuance in Office NO e| x
Nonpartisan VOTE FOR NO
Board of Education MORE THAN TWO.
JANE M. DAWSON el] x)
JODIE GOLDSWORTHY GORDON eo; x
JUDIE THELEN e|x
Write-in e| x
Write-in bd ioe

Question Number 1
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT

Cecil County -
Election and Terms of FOR ® | x
Office for the Board of AGAINST @ | x

County Commissioners

Excepts the Board of County Commissioners of
Cecil County from the constitutional requirements
that all State and county elections be held only
in every fourth year on a particular date and that
all State and county officers hold four-year terms,
in order to allow staggered terms with elections
held every second year.

Question Number 2
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT

Prince George’s County -
Property for FOR @ | x
Redevelopment Purposes AGAINST ®@ | X

Expressly authorizes the Prince George’s County
Council to take property immediately upon a finding
of immediate need for redevelopment purposes;
designates properties eligible for taking as those
located between Suitland Federal Center and Silver
Hill Road that are also within any two certain
designated areas (a revitalization tax district, an
enterprise zone, or a priority funding area); requires
the Council to pay at the time of taking the appraised
fair market value and also to pay any additional
amount later awarded by a jury; and requires the
Council to offer financial assistance and payments
to displaced owners or tenants.

mno1-1694. -VOTE BOTH SIDES- A
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           13440                   45656
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    78860                   84500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                       2787                    3193
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                101067                  185664
<PP&E>                                         2708424                 2400387
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1556362                 1361833
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1267505                 1329626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            95152                  117019
<BONDS>                                         422293                  312420
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                          4849                    4832
<OTHER-SE>                                      524949                  605591
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1267505                 1329626
<SALES>                                          85393                   98308
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 87266                  100437
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 30389                   32791
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6664                    5410
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  11164                   24171
<INCOME-TAX>                                      5184                    9946
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               5980                   14225
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                      5980                   14225
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12                    0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12                    0.29
        

</TABLE>
Case: 1:20-cr-00585 Document #: 3 Filed: 09/03/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:14
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  William  W.R. Elder, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report  of  Genus,  Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form  10-Q  fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results  of  operations  of  Genus,  Inc.


                                       By:/s/  William  W.R.  Elder
                                          -------------------------
                                       Name:  William W.R. Elder
                                       Title:   Chief Executive Officer

I,  Shum  Mukherjee,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report  of  Genus,  Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form  10-Q  fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results  of  operations  of  Genus,  Inc.

                                       By:/s/  Shum Mukherjee
                                          -------------------
                                       Name:   Shum Mukherjee
                                       Title:   Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
10492, 10503.

#### Covin *v.*Cairo Banking Company; and *vice versa.*

Jenkins, P. J.

1. Under the evidence in this case, this court is unable to say that the court below abused its discretion in the first grant of a new trial, even though it appears that a different judge than the one who tried the case was then acting. See in this connection *Van Giesen*v. *Queen Insurance Co.,*132 *Ga.*515 (64 S. E. 456); *Ga. So. & Fla. Ry. Co.*v. *Bryan,*15 *Ga. App.*253 (82 S. E. 913). The judgment complained of in the main bill of exceptions is therefore affirmed.

2. The cross-bill of exceptions assigns error upon exceptions pendente lite taken to the order of the trial court refusing to sustain and overruling the plea of res adjudicata interposed by the defendant. The assignment of error contained in the exceptions pendente lite is as follows: “The issue as to the plea of res adjudicata was submitted to the presiding judge for determination without the intervention of a jury; and said plea of res adjudicata was not sustained by the court and was overruled, the court holding that the former suit was not between the same parties and was not the same cause of action as that appearing in the suit at bar, to which ruling and judgment of the court defendant then and there excepted, now excepts, and assigns the same as error.” The Judgment thus excepted to is in the following language:- “The foregoing plea of res adjudicata is not sustained, and is therefore overruled, as not being same parties and same subject-matter.” *EelcL:*The language used in the judgment and in the exceptions pendente lite assigning error thereon must, when taken together, be construed as meaning that the court, acting as both court and jury, passed upon the *issue*raised by the plea of res adjudicata after a hearing had thereon, and not merely upon its legal sufficiency as against a motion to dismiss. On such a hearing there must necessarily have been introduced in evidence the entire record of the former action, since to simply attach *511copies thereof to the plea was not sufficient. *Findley*v. *Johnson,*84 *Ga.*69 (10 S. E. 594). Thus, while the plea of res adjudicata, together with the alleged copies of the former proceedings attached thereto, is specified in the cross-bill of exceptions, and is set forth in this record, yet the record of the former suit, in which it is claimed that the questions here raised were determined, is not set forth in the bill of exceptions or in a brief of the evidence, nor in any way properly authenticated; and therefore the objection made to the consideration of the cross-bill must be sustained. *Hodges*v. *Talbert,*135 *Ga.*253 (3), 259 (69 S. E. 103). See also *Cutts*v. *Scandrett,*108 *Ga.*620, 623 (34 S. E. 186); *Hall County*v. *Gilmer,*123 *Ga.*173 (51 S. E. 307).

Decided November 26, 1919.

Complaint; from city court of Cairo—Judge Harrell presiding. March *27,*1919. y

P. *O. Andrews, 8.*P. *Gain,*for Covin.

*M. L. Ledford, Bell & Weathers,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed on the main bill of exceptions; eross-bill dismissed.*

*Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4427 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 667
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4427

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 7, 2004

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

                             July 22, 2004

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 73 South Euclid Avenue in Montauk, New York, as the ``Perry B. 
                       Duryea, Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 73 
South Euclid Avenue in Montauk, New York, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Perry B. Duryea, Jr. Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Perry B. Duryea, Jr. Post 
Office''.

                                                       Calendar No. 667

108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4427

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 73 South Euclid Avenue in Montauk, New York, as the ``Perry B. 
                       Duryea, Jr. Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 22, 2004

                       Reported without amendment
```
<PAGE>   1



                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this registration statement of our reports dated April 25, 1997,
included in Daisytek International Corporation's Form 10-K for the year ended
March 31, 1997, and to all references to our Firm included in this registration
statement.


Dallas, Texas                                        /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
  May 20, 1998
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, John E. Reed, certify that, to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 2 for the year ended December 31, 2005 of Mestek, Inc. (the “Amendment No. 2”), the Amendment No. 2 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and that information contained in the Amendment No. 2 fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mestek, Inc. for the periods covered by the Amendment No. 2.

 

 

/S/ John E. Reed____________________________________

 

John E. Reed

Chief Executive Officer 

 

I, Stephen M. Shea, certify that, to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 of Mestek, Inc. (the “Amendment No. 2”), the Amendment No. 2 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and that information contained in the Amendment No. 2 fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mestek, Inc. for the periods covered by the Amendment No. 2.

 

/S/ Stephen M. Shea_____________________________________

 

Stephen M. Shea

Chief Financial Officer 

 

Dated: May 1, 2006

 

 
|   | Page 1 |
|--------|--------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000064892
<NAME> FDS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          16,334
<SECURITIES>                                    11,603
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,209
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,798
<INVENTORY>                                     44,632
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               127,541
<PP&E>                                          39,423
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,107
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 201,373
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,634
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,502
<OTHER-SE>                                     162,183
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   201,373
<SALES>                                        215,296
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               215,296
<CGS>                                           77,730
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  180,608
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   306
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  27
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,329
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,432
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,897
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,897
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .91
        

</TABLE>
#### Commonwealth *v.*Moses Rugless.

Recognizances — Bond—Release of Surety.

Where a party was indicted and fined and was afterward» taken into custody by the sheriff under a capias, and permitted to escape; it operated as a release of the surety on the recognizance bond.

*696APPEAL FROM LEWIS CIRCUIT COURT.

June 4, 1873.

*G. M. Thomas, for appellant.*

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

The party indicted and fined was afterwards taken into custody by the sheriff under a capias and permitted to escape.

This released the surety. Judgment *affirmed.*

-, *for appellee.*
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 233 / Thursday, December 4, 2014 / Notices 72061 

Issued in Washington, DC, on December 1, 

2014. 

Joe Hebert, 

Manager, Financial Analysis and Passenger 

Facility Charge Branch. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28526 Filed 12–3–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Surface Transportation Board 

Release of Waybill Data 

The Surface Transportation Board has 

received a request from BTGPactual 

(WB980–1—12/1/14) for permission to 

use certain data from the Board’s 2013 

Carload Waybill Sample. A copy of this 

request may be obtained from the Office 

of Economics. 

The waybill sample contains 

confidential railroad and shipper data; 

therefore, if any parties object to these 

requests, they should file their 

objections with the Director of the 

Board’s Office of Economics within 14 

calendar days of the date of this notice. 

The rules for release of waybill data are 

codified at 49 CFR 1244.9. 

Contact: Alexander Dusenberry, (202) 

245–0319. 

Jeffrey Herzig, 

Clearance Clerk. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28483 Filed 12–3–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915–01–P 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.1

Western Division

Nick Georgeff

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 3:20−cv−50313

Honorable Iain D. Johnston

Don Borneke Construction, Inc

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, June 26, 2023:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Iain D. Johnston: The plaintiff has moved to

strike four of the defendant's five affirmative defenses. Dkt. 80. The plaintiff proceeds

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f), but attaches and relies on hundreds of pages of exhibits

including deposition testimony and an expert report. The parties are directed to confer on

the issues raised in the motion to strike. If they are unable to resolve the issues

themselves, the proper vehicle for the plaintiff to attempt to obtain the relief it seeks based

on matters outside the pleadings is to file a motion for summary judgment under Fed. R.

Civ. P. 56. Before seeking summary judgment, the parties must abide by the requirements

set out on this Court's webpage for summary judgment motions. In the meantime, the

motion to strike [80] is stricken, as is its presentment set for 6/29/2023.(yxp, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 3:20-cv-50313 Document #: 82 Filed: 06/26/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:684