alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4403

To suspend temporarily the duty on Bis-Ethylhexyloxyphenol Methoxyphenol 

Triazine. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2004

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Bis-Ethylhexyloxyphenol 

Methoxyphenol Triazine.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.01.05 Bis-Ethylhexyloxyphenol 

Methoxyphenol Triazine 

(CAS No. 187393–00–6) 

(provided for in subheading 

2933.69.60) ......................... Free Free No change l2/31/07 ’’. 
2

•HR 4403 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
The NIST PRIVACY FRAMEWORK

at 1 Year

31K

Privacy Framework 

Downloads

TOP 10 COUNTRIES BY 

DOWNLOADS

US

Canada

UK

India

Brazil

Australia

Germany

Japan

Sweden

Thailand

More than a 

quarter of 

survey 

respondents 

had adopted 

the 

NIST Privacy 

Framework*

1 in 4

*Benefits, Attributes and Habits of Mature 

Privacy and Data Protection Programs, 

International Association of Privacy 

Professionals, FairWarning

October 2020

1,500 

virtual 

attendees

at the Help Wanted: Growing a 

Workforce for Managing 

Privacy Risk virtual workshop 

hosted by the International 

Association of Privacy 

Professionals on 

September 22-24, 2020

The Privacy 

Framework can be 

a market 

differentiator.

MARY N. CHANEY, ESQ., CISSP, 

CIPP/US

DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION 

SECURITY AND PRIVACY

ESPERION THERAPEUTICS, INC.

4

th most 

viewed blog

of the year on the 

NIST Cybersecurity 

Insights blog

Threat Models 

for Differential Privacy

40+ 

implementation 

resources

available in the

Resource Repository

Equifax is proud to be an 

early adopter of the NIST 

Privacy Framework....we 

are committed to building 

trust with consumers and 

customers who use our 

services or products.

NICK OLDHAM

CHIEF PRIVACY 

OFFICER

EQUIFAX

Most retweeted 

tweet from @NISTcyber

Cybersecurity @ NIST 

@NISTcyber · Jan 16, 2020 

HOT OFF THE PRESS: We’ve 

just released Version 1.0 of 

the voluntary @NIST #Privacy 

Framework! Check it out and 

consider adopting today.

95 Retweets and comments 87 Likes

3 languages

ENGLISH SPANISH

PORTUGUESE

January 2021

NIST.gov/privacyframework

@NISTcyber

Join Mailing List
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5         
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-30-1998             MAY-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1997             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998             FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                           72893                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,554,111                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,931,010                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,116,870                       0
<PP&E>                                       1,437,854                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,755,393                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,187,742                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           378                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,755,393                       0
<SALES>                                      5,734,859              14,382,715
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,734,859              14,382,715
<CGS>                                        3,470,100               8,909,753
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (95,411)               (287,346)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                542,249                 600,719
<INCOME-TAX>                                   225,668                 240,288
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   316,581                 360,431
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08                     .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
#### Max Maretzek, plaintiff, *vs.*William Cauldwell *et al.*defendants.

1. In an action to recover damages for a libel, respecting the plaintiff’s conduct in the management of theatrical representations, the fact that a juror declares himself opposed to theatrical representations, is not a ground of challenge for principal cause. ■ ’ •

2. Such an opinion does not amount to absolute incompetency, and is therefore only a ground of challenge to the favor,

(Before Robertson, Ch. J.,-

at special term, April —, 1867.)

Motion for a new trial. This action was bronght by Max Maretzek, the manager of an opera in the city of New York, against the defendants, William Cauldwell and Horace P. Whitney, publishers, editors and proprietors of *The Sunday*Mercury, a weekly paper published in the city of New York, to recover damages for two articles published therein, in October, 1863. The first article ivas headed “ The disgrace of the opera,” and it described the opera of the plaintiff as being frequented by vicious and immoral persons, and being such an exhibition as respectable women could not patronize. The second article, which was set forth as a second cause of, action, was entitled “ The Academy of Music under a cloud—Sin in high places.” This article made the same charges with more particularity.

The cause was tried,'at a trial term of the court, at which, upon the impanelling, of the jury, the plaintiff" challenged a juror named Meyer for principal cause, upon the ground that he was “opposed'to theatrical representations.” The juror was upon that challenge excluded by the court, and upon 'the trial the jury rendered a verdict for $1000 in favor of the plaintiff Upon this ground, among others, the defendants moved for a new trial.

*A. Oahey Sail,*for the motion..

*S. B. S, Judah,*opposed.

*661Robertson, Ch. J.

If the case on which this motion was made be correct, there was a fatal error committed on the former trial. A juror, (Meyer,) after a challenge of him by the counsel for the defendants had been withdrawn, was 'challenged by the plaintiff’s counsel for principal cause, which challenge was passed upon by the court. The juror having stated that “he was opposed to theatrical representations,” the plaintiff’s counsel claimed that he was.incompetent, and requested the court to exclude him; to which the counsel for the defendants objected. The court excluded the juror, and another was impaniielled in his stead; to which decision and course the counsel for the defendants- excepted.

Such an opinion, entertained by the juror, did not show either such relations to either party, or such bias and in-comp°etency, on account of a. fixed opinion, as amounted in law, to an absolute conclusive prejudging of the matters in issue in this action, so as to constitute a principal cause of challenge, and was therefore at most only a ground of challenge *to the favor*to be tried in the usual mode.

There must, therefore, be a new trial on the case, with costs to abide the event.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                      1,175,543
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,175,543
<CGS>                                           27,267
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,267
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,148,285
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (9)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (9)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         105,997
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                84,301
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    638,893
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         219,528
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           220,515
<LOANS>                                      1,242,679
<ALLOWANCE>                                     17,219
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,382,320
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,022,749
<SHORT-TERM>                                    71,140
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             24,007
<LONG-TERM>                                     25,337
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        48,635
<OTHER-SE>                                     187,876
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,382,320
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 28,506
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               13,748
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,080
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                43,334
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              18,865
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,213
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           23,121
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      317
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 102
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 15,922
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,261
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      11,261
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,197
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .65
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.21
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,446
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,266
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   913
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                17,694
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,233
<RECOVERIES>                                       468
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               17,219
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            17,219
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4337

To amend title 49, United States Code, relating to the assurance required 

of owners and operators of airports with respect to long-term leases 

for construction of hangars. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2004

Mr. PEARCE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, relating to the assurance required of owners and operators of airports with 

respect to long-term leases for construction of hangars.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. HANGAR CONSTRUCTION. 

4 Section 47107(a)(21) of title 49, United States Code, 

5 is amended by inserting ‘‘(of not less than 75 years)’’ after 

6 ‘‘long-term lease’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>    1
       
<S>                                           <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  Jun-30-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       6-mos
<CASH>                                            738,932
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     216,633
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  965,001
<PP&E>                                          9,552,336
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,884,810
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  8,925,157
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             605,734
<BONDS>                                         4,498,159
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                      2,360,611
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    8,925,157
<SALES>                                           920,452
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  930,145
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     481,021
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  213,376
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                190,332
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (32,848)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (32,848)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (32,848)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

          In connection with the Annual Report of Mills Music Trust. (the
"Trust") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Joel Faden, the chief
financial individual providing accounting services, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:

          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Trust.*

*    The statements of cash receipts and disbursements reflect only cash
     transactions and do not include transactions that would be recorded in
     financial statements presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The
     Trust is required to distribute all funds received after payment of
     expenses. Accordingly, the Trust has not prepared any statements of
     financial condition or cash flows.


Date: April 13, 2007                    /s/ Joel Faden
                                        ----------------------------------------


                                      -22-
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Patricia G. Kriss, Chief Financial Officer of Entropin, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(a) the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and



(b) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: May 12, 2005



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Patricia G. Kriss  
|    |  | Patricia G. Kriss      
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Entropin, Inc. and will be retained by Entropin, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
Exhibit
10.5


 


ACKNOWLEDGMENT
AND AGREEMENT


 


Diamond Jo Worth, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company (the “Pledged Company”) hereby (i) acknowledges receipt of a
fully executed copy of the foregoing Stock Pledge Agreement, dated as of June
16, 2004, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Pledge Agreement dated
as of November 10, 2004 and as supplemented by that certain Stock Pledge
Agreement Supplement dated as of even date herewith (the “Supplement”)
(as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time,
the “Agreement”; capitalized terms used herein without definition have
the meanings provided therein), made by the Pledgors in favor of Wells Fargo
Foothill, Inc., as Agent; (ii) consents and agrees to the pledge by the Pledgors
of the Pledged Collateral pursuant to the Agreement and to all of the other
terms and provisions of the Agreement; (iii) represents and warrants that it
has no knowledge, prior to giving effect to this acknowledgment, of any lien,
restriction or adverse claim of any kind to which any interests of the Pledgors
or the Agent is subject; (iv) irrevocably waives any breach or default under
the Operating Agreement as a result of the execution, delivery and performance
by the Pledgors and the Agent of the Agreement; (v) advises the Pledgors and
the Agent that a pledge of the Pledged Interests set forth on Schedule 1
to the Supplement has been registered on the books of the Pledged Company and
in the name of the Agent and agrees to so register any additional interests
pledged pursuant to the Agreement, and (vi) consents and agrees to any transfer
of the Pledged Collateral pursuant to Section 5 of the Agreement.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, a duly authorized officer of the
undersigned has executed and delivered this Acknowledgment and Agreement this 12
day of July, 2005.


	
   

  	
  DIAMOND JO WORTH, LLC

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Natalie A. Schramm

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Natalie A. Schramm

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Chief Financial Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  WITNESSED:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Karen M. Beetem

  	
   

  
	
  Name:

  	
  Karen M. Beetem
Exhibit 32(a)





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Annual Report of EnviroStar, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael S. Steiner, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





September 24, 2010








/s/ Michael S. SteinerMichael S. SteinerPrincipal Executive Officer
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 6, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-807 Lower Tribunal No. 13-29724

________________ 

### Aquasol Condominium Association, Inc. ,

Appellant,
vs. 

### HSBC Bank USA, N.A., etc.,

Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Beatrice Butchko, Judge. David J. Winker, P.A., and David Winker, for appellant. DeLuca Law Group, PLLC, and Joseph G. Paggi III and Kimberly George (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee. Before LOGUE, C.J., and HENDON and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.