alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND BALANCE SHEET OF INSPIRE INSURANCE SOLUTIONS, INC.
AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          19,721
<SECURITIES>                                     8,541
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,636
<ALLOWANCES>                                       248
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,774
<PP&E>                                          14,599
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,853
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 108,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,297
<BONDS>                                            783
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           119
<OTHER-SE>                                      97,879
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    97,998
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,356
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,015
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  19
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,741
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,421
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,319
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,319
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use in this
Registration Statement on Form S-4 of our reports dated December 23, 1996 
on Greenway II, January 14, 1997 on Denver Portfolio, February 14, 1997 on 
Trammell Crow Center, March 18, 1997 on Carter-Crowley Operating Real Estate 
Portfolio, July 23, 1997 on Fountain Place, August 21, 1997 on Miami Center, 
August 22, 1997 on Houston Center, August 29, 1997 on US Home Building, 
October 15, 1997 on Bank One Center, December 4, 1997 on Energy Centre, 
December 12, 1997 on Austin Centre, January 16, 1998 on Post Oak Central, 
January 16, 1998 on Washington Harbor, January 23, 1998 on Crescent Real Estate 
Equities Limited Partnership and March 4, 1998 on Datran Center and to all 
references to our Firm included in this Registration Statement.



                                                 Arthur Andersen LLP



Dallas, Texas,
May 29, 1998
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. and will be retained by Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ Geoffrey S. M. Hedrick

---

Geoffrey S. M. Hedrick

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

May 12, 2003



/s/ James J. Reilly

---

James J. Reilly

Chief Financial Officer

May 12, 2003
Order entered June 30 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00369
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF L.D.R. AND D.J. , CHILD REN On Appeal from the 254 th Judicial District Cou r t

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 18
- 04007
- R

O RDER
T he repo rter ’ s record in this accelerated termination of par ental rights appeal
is overdue. Because these types of appeals must be handled expeditiously, we
ORDER Stacy Harlow, Official C o urt Repo rter for the 254 th Judic ial District
Court , to file the reporter ’ s record wi thin FIVE DAYS of the date of this order. In
the event Ms . Ha rlow di d not record t he proceedings in this ca se, we order her to

prov ide the Court , within THREE DAYS of the date of this order, with the name
and contact information for the court reporter who recorded the proce edings

. The Clerk o f the Court is DIR ECTE D to sen d a copy of this order to :Hon orable Kimberly Brown

Pr esid ing Ju dge 254 th Jud icial District Court
S t acy Ha rlow Official Court Reporter 254 th Judicial District Court All parties

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, Gregg D. Scheller, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Synergetics USA, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release34-47986];(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: December 8, 2006              /s/ Gregg D. Scheller   Gregg D. Scheller   President and Chief Executive Officer
10141.

#### Camp *v.*Bagwell & Bagwell.

Decided May 7, 1919.

Trover; from city court of Carrollton—Judge Beall. August 30, 1918.

*S. Holderness,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. M.*Moore, *Boykin & Boykin,*contra.

Broyles, P. J.

1. The charge of the court covered "substantially the , controlling issues in the case, and, in the absence of any timely, appropriate, written request for fuller instruction, the omission to charge upon all the contentions of the defendant was not error.

2. The alleged newly discovered evidence was cumulative and impeaching in its character, and the court did not err in overruling the special ground of the motion for a new trial based thereon.

3. There was a sharp conflict in the evidence, but the jury decided the issue in favor of the plaintiffs, anil, there being some evidence to support the verdict, which has been approved by the trial judge, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial is

*Affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.*
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 27, 2009 

d0518 

Order 

 

May 27, 2009 

138017 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138017 

 COA: 278689 

Montcalm CC: 06-008535-FC 

RICHARD ALLEN MATTHEWS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 18, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, Gregg D. Scheller, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Synergetics USA, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release34-47986];(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:December 12, 2005  /s/ Gregg D. Scheller     Gregg D. Scheller  President and Chief Executive Officer
27
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         210,490
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,104,526
<ALLOWANCES>                                    92,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,538,192
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,055,906
<PP&E>                                       3,178,554
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,630,130
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,825,233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,573,081
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,180
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,243,972
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,825,233
<SALES>                                      1,489,120
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,489,120
<CGS>                                          914,610
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  914,610
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               578,840
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              72,267
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,657
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,170
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,487
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,487
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNIFORM LAWS AND REGULATIONS IN THE AREAS OF LEGAL METROLOGY AND ENGINE FUEL QUALITYNIST Handbook2013130 

# Uniform Laws and Regulations in the areas of legal metrology and engine fuel quality
as adopted by the 97th National Conference on Weights and Measures 2012

NIST Handbook 

### 2013 

# 130
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of LG Display Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: May 3, 2011



/S/ YOUNG SOO
KWONYoung Soo KwonRepresentative Director/President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to LG Display Co., Ltd. and will be retained by LG Display Co., Ltd. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1

 
                       INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Optek Technology, Inc.



We consent to the use of our reports included and incorporated by reference
herein and to the references to our firm under the headings "Selected
Consolidated Financial Data" and "Experts" in the prospectus.





                                                      KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Dallas, Texas
April 30, 1998
United States Department of Com

National Institute of Standards and Technolo

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For: 

Indiana 

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international 

system of units (SI), maintains a documented calibration program, documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully completed training and proficiency tests, submitted a quality management system, andhas demonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate. The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope 

Mass Echelon III Volume Transfer, II 25 kg to 1 mg 100 gal to 5 gal

1000 lb to 0.001 lb

4 oz to 0.03125 oz

Volume Transfer, II LPG 100 gal

Weight Carts

6000 lb to 3000 lb

__________Douglas A. ONIST Office 

Effective Dat

(Rev.: February 2020)
Exhibit 32.1


      Certification of Chief Executive Officer/Principal Financial Officer
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 31, 2003 ("Report") of Valley Forge Scientific Corp., I, Jerry L.
Malis, President and Chief Executive Officer of Valley Forge Scientific Corp.,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
             or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of Valley Forge Scientific Corp.



Date: February 11, 2004                /s/ JERRY L. MALIS
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Jerry L. Malis
                                       President,
                                       Chief Executive Officer, and
                                       Principal Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of the Securities
Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless
of any general incorporation language in such filing.

                                      -22-
#### In the Matter of William A. Simons.

*Impmonment for 'default in obeying order of court,*

A precept issued by tbe Register in Chancery for the imprisonment of a party who has been ordered to make a payment to another party, or in default thereof, be imprisoned, is void if the default has not been adjudicated by the court.

*512Habeas corpus.

Motion for discharge submitted and granted November 1.

*John*G, *Shields*for the motion.

*B. A. Montgomery*against.

The relator was imprisoned under a precept issued by the Register in Chancery for the county of Ingham, for the non-payment of a sum of money which he had been required by the circuit court in chancery for that county to pay to a person named who was party to a suit in that court, in which relator was also a party. The order directed the money to be paid by a day named, and in default that relator be imprisoned in the county jail until payment, but not to exceed one year. After the day named had passed, the Register, on an affidavit being filed with him showing that payment had not been made, issued his precept for the arrest of the defendant, and he was taken and imprisoned under it.

The court held the proceeding unwarranted, and ordered the relator’s discharge. If the order of the circuit court in chancery was one the court might make, the question whether there was default in complying with it could only be adjudicated by the court itself, and a precept issued without such adjudication was void.
CHARLES MOULTRIE

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILE D

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2886

Opinion filed July 22, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Charles Moultrie, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

D ISMISSED. S ee Baker v. State , 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

ROBERTS, C.J., ROWE and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
**                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1.**
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                                SUBSIDIARY LIST

1.  Packaged Ice Leasing, Inc.
2.  Southco Ice, Inc.
3.  Southwest Texas Packaged Ice, Inc.
4.  Southwestern Ice, Inc.
5.  Mission Party Ice, Inc.
6.  Packaged Ice Southeast, Inc.
7.  Golden Eagle Ice-Texas, Inc.
8.  Southern Bottled Water Company, Inc.
9.  Reddy Ice Corporation
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 30, 2021

NO. 03

- 21

- 00028

- CV

Kerrie Renee Knauth , Appellant

v.

Jerry Knauth , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 395TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAK ER, AND SMITH

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment sign ed b y the tr i a l court on January 8, 2021 . Having

reviewed the record , the Court holds that appellant has not prosecuted he r appeal and did not

comply with a notice from the C lerk of this C ourt

. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appea l for

want of prosec ution. A ppellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and

in the court below.