alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Elizabeth H. Davila, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
of VISX, Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of VISX, Incorporated.

                                              /s/ Elizabeth H. Davila
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Elizabeth H. Davila
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              July 31, 2003

I, Timothy R. Maier, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
of VISX, Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of VISX, Incorporated.

                                              /s/ Timothy R. Maier
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Timothy R. Maier
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              July 31, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COSTILLA ENERGY INC. FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001018980
<NAME> COSTILLA ENERGY INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          17,089
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,035
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,563
<PP&E>                                         285,708
<DEPRECIATION>                                  86,242
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 238,258
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,286
<BONDS>                                        182,441
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                5
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           998
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,215
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   238,258
<SALES>                                         32,015
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,712
<CGS>                                           14,226
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,454
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,364
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,833
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,009)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,009)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (299)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,615)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.66)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       5,414,533
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          94,351
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 21,576,363
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,660,053
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,692,172
<LOANS>                                     90,576,445
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,663,061
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             123,607,297
<DEPOSITS>                                 109,348,721
<SHORT-TERM>                                   760,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,889,663
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,382,682
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,226,231
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              11,608,913
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,648,815
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              763,997
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,054
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,414,866
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,161,211
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,198,819
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,216,047
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              (4,729)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,926,107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,614,656
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,614,656
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   986,656
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .65
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                    399,675
<LOANS-PAST>                                   257,879
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,704,318
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   47,070
<RECOVERIES>                                     5,813
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,663,061
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,663,061
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

July Term 2014

RENETTE GABRIEL and JEAN ROBERT DORESTIN,

Appellants,

v.

CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION,

Appellee.

No. 4D13-3830

[September 17, 2014]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Mily Rodriguez-Powell, Judge; L.T. Case No. 12-15505 

(03).

Joshua A. Blacksten and Vyacheslav Borshchukov of Duboff Law Firm, 

North Miami, for appellants.

David C. Borucke and Aram P. Megerian of Cole Scott & Kissane, P.A., 

Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Based on appellee’s confession of error, we agree that appellants’ 

purported assignment of benefits was invalid and we reverse the summary 

judgment entered below.

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the use in the Prospectus constituting part of this
Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Regal Cinemas, Inc. of our report dated
February 28, 1997, relating to the financial statements of Act III Cinemas,
Inc., which appears in such Prospectus.  We also consent to the reference to us
under the heading "Experts" in such Prospectus.





                                                  /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

                                                      

   
Portland, Oregon
October 12, 1998
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 16.1



June 3, 1998



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549

Gentlemen:

We have read Item 4 of Form 8-K dated June 3, 1998, of Capstar Communications,
Inc., formerly known as SFX Broadcasting, Inc., and are in agreement with the
statements contained in paragraph 2 on page 2 therein. We have no basis to
agree or disagree with other statements of the registrant contained therein.



                                                            Ernst & Young LLP
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          27,543
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  476,672
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,790
<INVENTORY>                                    327,136
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               904,959
<PP&E>                                       1,655,646
<DEPRECIATION>                                 803,761
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,329,940
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          570,011
<BONDS>                                        488,537
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       146,438
<OTHER-SE>                                     427,552
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,329,940
<SALES>                                      3,001,656
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,001,656
<CGS>                                        2,180,213
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,180,213
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                14,152
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,006
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                228,237
<INCOME-TAX>                                    89,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            139,237
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,548)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   136,429
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.34
        


</TABLE>
A

A

A

A

A

A

A A A

A A A

A A A

A

Y W A

A A A

W

Y A A

A Y A A
A Y

A

w

A A w w

w w w w

w

A Y W

A

w w w

w w

w w w

w A

w

w

w w w w

w

W w
A Y w

w

w A w

A w w

w

w

w

W

A w w

w w

A A w w w

w

w

A Y A

w w

A w

w

A w
w w

A w

w

w

w

w

W w w

w w

A w w w A

w w

A

A

A Y A w

w w w w

W w

Y

A

Y

A Y w
w w

W W

A w

w

W w

w

w w

w w

w w

w

W w

w W

w

A

w w

w w A

w w w w

w w w
w A

A Y

A

A

A

w w

A

A Y

A

A Y

A

A

A

Y Y

A Y
#### John Daniel *v.*Commonwealth.

Criminal Law — Carrying Concealed Weapons.

The offense denounced and intended to he punished by the statute, is the practice of carrying deadly weapons concealed from ordinary and common observation, and not such open and visible arming of the person as would be readily seen and understood, and although the pistol may have been worn in scabbard and thus a part of it concealed from view, yet if enough of it was exposed to ordinary observation as to show plainly what it was, such carrying was not an offense under the statute.

APPEAL PROM BATH CIRCUIT COURT.

June 7, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge HaRdin :

The question to be determined by the jury in this case was, whether or not the defendant was guilty, as charged, of carrying concealed a pistol, which was a deadly weapon. (1 R. S. 14.)

In explanation of what constituted the offense, the court instructed the jury that “carrying a pistol in a scabbard around *33the defendant, is a concealment within the statute, although the scabbard was visible and portions of the pistol invisible.”

*Nesbitt, for appellant.*

*Attorney-General, for appellee.*

We cannot concur in this construction of the law. The offense denounced and intended to be punished by the statute, manifestly is the practice of carrying deadly weapons concealed from ordinary and common observation, and not such open and visible arming of the person as would be readily seen and understood, and although the pistol of the appellant may have been worn in a scabbard, as such weapons are, and thus a part of it conceaed from view; yet, if eough of it was exposed to ordinary observation, and not hidden by clothing or otherwise as to show plainly what it was such a carrying of it was not, in our opinion, an offense under the statute.

The judgment is therefore reversed and the' cause remanded for a new trial on principles not inconsistent with this opinion.
10450.

#### Donalson *v.*The State.

Beoyles, P. J.

1. The statute prohibiting anyone from carrying, outside of his own home or place of business, a pistol, without first obtaining a license from the ordinary of the county in which he resides (Acts 1910, p. 134, Park’s Penal Code, § 348 (a), 348 (b) ), when properly construed as a whole, means that where on.e gives the required bond and secures a license to carry a pistol, he is authorized thereby to carry only the identical pistol for which the license is issued. While this is true, and while the act requires the ordinary granting the license to keep a record of the name of the person taking out the license, the name of the maker of the pistol to be carried, and the caliber and number of the pistol, the act does not require that these facts (except, of course, the name of the person to whom the license is issued) shall appear in the license itself or in any certificate from the ordinary that he has issued such a license.

2. Where upon the trial of one charged with carrying a pistol, outside of his own home or place of business, the defendant tendered in evidence a license from the ordinary of his home county authorizing the de*74fendant to carry a 38-caliber S. & W. pistol, and also offered in evidence a certificate from the ordinary that he had issued this license; and the evidence showed that the , istol which the defendant was charged with carrying was a 38-caliber pistol of Smith & Wesson make, it was error for the court to exclude the license and the ordinary’s certificate. This documentary evidence, while not presenting a complete defense, in that it failed to show the number of the pistol which the defendant was licensed to carry, and therefore did not affirmatively establish that he was authorized under the license to carry the identical pistol which he was charged with carrying, was nevertheless admissible as a link in his chain of defense. Under such circumstances he would have the right, if he could do so, to prove by parol testimony, or by his statement (provided the jury saw fit to believe it), that the pistol he was charged with carrying was the same pistol referred to in the license.

Decided July 16, 1919.

Accusation of carrying pistol; from city court of Miller county— Judge Geer. March 22, 1919.

*P. D. Rich,*for plaintiff in error.

*N. L. Stapleton, solicitor,*contra.

3. The error in excluding the documentary evidence referred to above requires a new trial of the case.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Bloodworth wnd Stephens, JJ., concur.*
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4483 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,2 Hexanediol. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 2, 2004 

Mr. BROWN of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,2 Hexanediol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 1,2 HEXANEDIOL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following: 

‘‘ 9902.34.31 1,2 Hexanediol (CAS No. 

6920–22–5) (provided for in 

subheading 2905.39.90) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2007 ’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 
2 

•HR 4483 IH 

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
United States Department of Com

National Institute of Standards and Technolo

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For: 

Michigan 

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international system of units (SI), maintains a documented calibration program, documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully completed training and proficiency tests, submitted a quality management system, and has demonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate. The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope 

Mass Echelon I Mass Echelon III Volume Gravimetric, I 20 kg to 1 mg 500 kg to 1 mg 2 L to 100 mL

Mass Echelon II 1000 lb to 0.001 lb 25 gal to 0.5 pt20 kg to 1 mg

50 lb to 0.001 lb

8 oz to 0.03125 oz

8 oz to 0.03125 oz

Weight Carts

6000 lb to 3000 lb

Volume Gravimetric, I SVP 30 gal to 5 gal

Volume Transfer, II 

___________Katrice LippNIST Office 

Wheel Load Weighers 2000 gal to 5 gal Effective Date

20 000 lb to 5000 lb Volume Transfer, II LPG 

100 gal to 20 gal

(Rev.: September 2021)
#### The Detroit Western Transit and Junction Railroad Company v. Absalom Backus, Jr.

*Certiorari to review condemnation proceedings.*

A writ of *certiorari*removing condemnation proceedings to the Supremo Court was not retained by the court where the questions raised were such as could be raised by *certiorari*or appeal after the inquest of damages, and the retention of the writ was likely to do injury by delaying the proceedings.

Certiorari to Wayne Circuit Court.

Submitted June 13.-

Decided June 21.

*F. A. Balter*for plaintiff in certiorari.

*A. M. Henry*and *G. V. N. Lotlirojy*for defendant ins certiorari.

Campbell, J.

As the question raised by this *certiorari*can be raised by *certiorari*or appeal after the inquest, the more convenient practice in most cases is to postpone the-granting of appellate process in such matters as the present, where there is likely to be danger of protracted delays, until the final action below; and while the writ is not beyond the power of the court, it is not deemed wise to retain it. This-is not, therefore, a proper occasion to consider the asserted rights of the company to assume possession in case of a. favorable verdict by a jury and an appeal from its confirmation. Adequate means can usually be found to prevent unlawful invasions of possession ; and we do not think the-retention of tire present writ will probably be necessary to-protect the interests of the land-owner in case they should be unlawfully jeoparded. We are not to be understood as determining any tiling more now than the general impolicy of issuing writs of *certiorari*in the earlier stages of railroad. *583inquests, and the present case does not differ from many others in regard to the matters in dispute, on which our opinion will be reserved. The writ will therefore be dismissed as improvidently granted, but with'out prejudice to future proceedings.

Oooley, J. and Graves, C. J. concurred.
#### THE STATE ex rel. WILSON, Collector, v. CARTHAGE NATIONAL BANK, Appellant.

In Banc,

March 23, 1904.

TAXATION: Assessment Against Bank. The judgment in this case, which was for personal taxes assessed against a national hank, and not against its stockholders, is reversed on the authority of State ex rel. v. Bank, 180 Mo. 717.

Appeal from Jasper Circuit Court. — *Eon. Jos. D. Perkins,*Judge.

Reversed.

ROBINSON, C. J.

Suit by the collector of Jasper county to collect of defendant, Carthage National Bank, certain personal taxes amounting to $442.77, alleged to be due the county and State for the year 1901, assessed and levied against defendant on account of its shares of *3stock, duly listed by defendant’s chief officer, and delivered to the assessor for taxation.

In the circuit court judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff, and the case is brought to this court on defendant’s appeal along with the companion suit, State ex rel. Wilson v. First National Bank of Carterville, 180 Mo. 717.

The questions involved in this case are in all essential particulars the same as in the case against the First National Bank of Oarterville, supra. Upon the authority of, and for the reasons given therein, ’the judgment of the circuit court herein should be reversed, and it is so ordered.

*Marshall, Burgess, Gantt, Valliant*and *Fox, JJ.j*concur; *Brace, J.,*dissents.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



I, Gandolfo Verra, Chief Financial Officer of Cordia Corporation (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period June 30, 2007 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By: /s/ Gandolfo Verra



Gandolfo Verra

Chief Financial Officer



August 14, 2007



* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cordia Corporation and will be retained by Cordia Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.