Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 231 / Tuesday, December 2, 2014 / Notices 71447 

2Chairman Meredith M. Broadbent dissented. 

3 In its preliminary countervailing duty 

determination, Commerce found that imports of 

non-oriented electrical steel were not being and not 

likely to be subsidized by the government of Korea 

(79 FR 16295, March 25, 2014). Following a final 

negative countervailing duty determination by 

Commerce with respect to non-oriented electrical 

steel from Korea (79 FR 61605, October 14, 2014), 

the Commission terminated investigation No. 701– 

TA–507 (79 FR 64408, October 29, 2014). 

States at less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’), 

and by reason of imports from China 

and Taiwan that have been found by 

Commerce to be subsidized by the 

governments of China and Taiwan.2 The 

Commission also finds that imports 

subject to Commerce’s affirmative 

critical circumstances determinations 

are not likely to undermine seriously 

the remedial effect of those 

countervailing and antidumping duty 

orders to be issued on non-oriented 

electrical steel from China, Germany, 

Japan, and Sweden. 

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

investigations effective September 30, 

2013, following receipt of a petition 

filed with the Commission and 

Commerce by AK Steel Corp., West 

Chester, Ohio. The final phase of these 

investigations was scheduled by the 

Commission following notification of 

preliminary determinations by 

Commerce that imports of non-oriented 

electrical steel from China and Taiwan 

were subsidized within the meaning of 

section 703(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 

1671b(b)) and that imports of nonoriented electrical steel from China, 

Germany, Japan, Korea, Sweden, and 

Taiwan were sold at LTFV within the 

meaning of 733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 

1673b(b)).3 Notice of the scheduling of 

the final phase of the Commission’s 

investigations and of a public hearing to 

be held in connection therewith was 

given by posting copies of the notice in 

the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

Washington, DC, and by publishing the 

notice in the Federal Register on July 

11, 2014 (79 FR 40143). The hearing was 

held in Washington, DC, on October 8, 

2014, and all persons who requested the 

opportunity were permitted to appear in 

person or by counsel. 

The Commission completed and filed 

its determinations in these 

investigations on November 25, 2014. 

The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 4502 

(November 2014), entitled Non-Oriented 

Electrical Steel from China, Germany, 

Japan, Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan: 

Investigation Nos. 701–TA–506 and 508 

and 731–TA–1238–1243 (Final). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: November 25, 2014. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28249 Filed 12–1–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed 

Consent Decree Under the Oil 

Pollution Act of 1990 and Section 128d 

of the Hawaii Environmental Response 

Law 

On November 20, 2014, the 

Department of Justice lodged a proposed 

Consent Decree (‘‘Consent Decree’’) with 

the United States District Court for the 

District of Hawaii in an action entitled 

United States of America and the State 

of Hawaii v. Denak Ship Management 

and Vogetrader Shipping Inc., Civil 

Action No. 14–00529. 

In this action, the United States and 

the State of Hawaii filed a joint 

complaint against Denak Ship 

Management and Vogetrader Shipping 

Inc. (‘‘Defendants’’) pursuant to Sections 

1002(a), (b)(1)(A) and (b)(2)(A), of the 

Oil Pollution Act of 1990, 33 U.S.C. 

2701 et seq., or Section 128D of the 

Hawaii Environmental Response law, 

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 128D, respectively, to 

recover for natural resource damages 

arising from the February 5, 2010, 

grounding of the M/V Vogetrader on 

coral reef habitat outside the entrance 

channel to Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, 

Hawaii. 

The Consent Decree requires the 

Defendants to pay eight hundred forty 

thousand dollars ($840,000) in natural 

resource damages. Of this sum, six 

hundred ninety five thousand six 

hundred fifty seven dollars ($695,657) 

shall be paid to the United States 

Department of Commerce, National 

Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration (‘‘NOAA’’) on behalf of 

the natural resource trustees and will be 

used for the design, implementation, 

and oversight of restoration projects. 

The remaining one hundred forty four 

thousand three hundred forty three 

dollars ($144,343) shall be paid to 

NOAA for reimbursement of its natural 

resource damage assessment costs. 

The publication of this notice opens 

a period for public comment on the 

Consent Decree. Comments should be 

addressed to the Assistant Attorney 

General, Environment and Natural 

Resources Division, and should refer to 

United States of America and the State 

of Hawaii v. Denak Ship Management 

and Vogetrader Shipping Inc., D.J. Ref. 

No. 90–5–1–1–11013. All comments 

must be submitted no later than thirty 

(30) days after the publication date of 

this notice. Comments may be 

submitted either by email or by mail: 

To submit 

comments: Send them to: 

By email ... pubcomment-ees.enrd@

usdoj.gov. 

By mail ..... Assistant Attorney General, U.S. 

DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, 

Washington, DC 20044–7611. 

During the public comment period, 

the Consent Decree may be examined 

and downloaded at this Justice 

Department Web site: http://

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_

Decrees.html. We will provide paper 

copies of the Consent Decree upon 

written request and payment of 

reproduction costs. Please mail your 

request and payment to: Consent Decree 

Library, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 

7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611. 

Please enclose a check or money order 

for $5.25 (25 cents per page 

reproduction cost) for the Consent 

Decree payable to the United States 

Treasury. 

Henry Friedman, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28340 Filed 12–1–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—Members of SGIP 2.0, Inc. 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

October 27, 2014, pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), 

Members of SGIP 2.0, Inc. (‘‘MSGIP 

2.0’’) has filed written notifications 

simultaneously with the Attorney 

General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing changes in its 

membership. The notifications were 

filed for the purpose of extending the 

Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of 

antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages 

under specified circumstances. 

Specifically, PowerHub Systems, 

Blacksburg, VA; London Hydro, 

London, United Kingdom; 

Telecommunications Technology 

Association, Seongnam-City, Gyeonggido, Republic of Korea; Utility 

Integration Solutions Organization, Fort 

Washington, PA; and Advanced Energy 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES