alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ILEGSR SC Quality Roadmap

Standard to 

be drafted

To be 

evaluated

Some work 

completed

= Needs Further Research

On OSAC 

Registry

IL Annex

Training

QA/QC Guide

E3255 Explosives Annex

GSR Annex

Quality System

ISO17025

IL Annex

Explosives Annex

GSR Annex

Method Validation & 

Verification

WK 72631

Health & Safety

(OSHA Lab)

Terminology

Report Writing

Explosives 

WK73117

IL

GSR 

WK58457

Explosives 

WK56998

IL

E3197

GSR 

WK59510

Explosives 

WK73484

IL

WK7348

GSR 

WK69622

Quality
Guide to IL

E3245 Simple headspace

E1388

Solvent extraction

E1386

Passive headspace

E1412

Dynamic Headspace 

E1413

Headspace with conc 

E3189

Veg Oil 

E2881

SPME

E2154

Biodiesel

E2997

Ignitable 

Liquid 

Analysis

ILEGSR SC Roadmap of Ignitable Liquid Analysis Standards 

Data 

Interpretation & 

Classification

GC-MS

Analysis

Extraction

Systematic 

Approach

Preservation 

E2451

Standard to 

be drafted

To be 

evaluated

Some work 

completed

= Needs Further Research

On OSAC 

Registry
Analytical 

Methods and 

Interpretation

(Page 3)

Residue Guide

Including identification 

requirements

WK73923

Intact Guide

Including identification 

requirements

WK67862

Explosives 

ILEGSR SC Roadmap of Explosive Standards (pg 1) 

Analysis Plans

(Page 2)

Standard to 

be drafted

To be 

evaluated

Some work 

completed

= Needs Further Research

On OSAC 

Registry
Smokeless Powder

E2998

ILEGSR SC 

Roadmap of 

Explosive 

Standards (pg 2) 

Dynamites

Primary Explosives

Peroxide Mixes

Black Powder, 

Substitutes, and Solid 

Oxidizer/Fuel Mixtures

Plastic Explosives

Blasting Agents (AN 

based) Analysis Plans

Standard to 

be drafted

To be 

evaluated

Some work 

completed

= Needs Further Research

On OSAC 

Registry
GC-MS and 

FTIR of 

Smokeless 

Powder 

E2999

ILEGSR SC 

Roadmap of 

Explosive 

Standards (pg 3)

*Tentative 

Note: The need for analytical method and interpretation documents will be determined based on 

completion of the analysis plans and possible OSAC interdisciplinary documents.

CE

SEM-EDS 

& XRF

TLC & 

Spot Tests

XRD

Raman

LC & LC-MS

Analytical Methods IC & IC-MS

and Interpretation

PLM

FTIR

GC & GC-MS

Standard to 

be drafted

To be 

evaluated

Some work 

completed

= Needs Further Research

On OSAC 

Registry
ILEGSR SC Roadmap of Gunshot Residue Standards 

pGSR

oGSR

Collection

Analysis

Collection

Analysis

Interpretation

*Prevalence Study 

Needed

Interpretation

Overview

E1588-20

Automated Analysis

Particle Re-acquisition

Classification

GC-MS

LC-MS

From Hands & 

Inanimate Objects

WK72856

From Inanimate Objects

GSR

Standard to 

be drafted

To be 

evaluated

Some work 

completed

= Needs Further Research

On OSAC 

Registry
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-288-CV

THE ESTATE OF JOHN AROON

SOOKMA, DECEASED 	

	------------

	FROM PROBATE COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------	

	Appellant Julia A. Sookma attempts to appeal from the trial court’s orders signed on January 8, 2008; January 17, 2008; February 1, 2008; and February 5, 2008.  According to the trial court clerk, the trial court did not sign any orders on January 17, 2008 or February 5, 2008.  The trial court’s January 8 and February 1 orders authorized the county clerk to invest disputed funds on deposit with the county clerk in interest-bearing accounts and thus do not appear to be final appealable orders.  See Tex. Prob. Code Ann. § 5(g) (Vernon Supp. 2008); Crowson v. Wakeham, 897 S.W.2d 779, 783 (Tex. 1995) (stating that if there is an express statute declaring the phase of the probate proceedings to be final and appealable, that statute controls; otherwise, if there is a proceeding of which the order may logically be considered a part, but one or more pleadings also part of that proceeding raise issues or parties not disposed of, then the probate order is interlocutory).

	On July 11, 2008, we notified Sookma of our concern that we lacked jurisdiction over this appeal and stated that we would dismiss the appeal unless Sookma or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed on or before July 21, 2008 a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.  We received no response.

	Accordingly, because the trial court’s January 8 and February 1 orders are not final, appealable orders, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  WALKER, GARDNER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED:  August 7, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EVEREST
MANAGED FUTURES FUND, L.P. FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      27,106,822
<SECURITIES>                                20,064,362
<RECEIVABLES>                                  276,168
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            47,447,353
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,447,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,210,800
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  45,236,555
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                47,447,353
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           (5,083,415)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  419,530
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,502,945)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,502,945)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,502,945)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (200.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (200.52)


</TABLE>
Errata for 

Voluntary Product Standard (PS) 2-04 

Performance Standard for Wood-Based Structural-Use Panels 

Page 7 - The heading for imperial units of Minimum Ultimate Load Following Impact 

in Table 1 should “lbf”. 

Page 10 - The heading for metric units of Nominal Thickness in Table 6 should be 

“mm” 

Page 10 - In Table 6 the metric Nominal Thickness corresponding to 1 inch should 

be 25.4 mm. 

Page 18 - The heading for metric units of Bending Strength, MM in Table 7 for both 

panel directions should be “N - mm/mm”. 

Pages 34 and 36 - The metric units for the loads expressed in Section 7.20.2 and 

7.20.4 should be Newtons and the relation between Newtons (N) and pounds (lb) is 

as follows: 

• 10 lb equals 44.5 N 

• 20 lb equals 89.0 N 

• 40 lb equals 178.0 N 

Page 36 - The metric values of “Pre-load” and “Test load” presented in Table 8 are 

incorrect. The values should be 44.5 N, 89.0 N and 178.0 N corresponding to 10 lb, 

20 lb and 40 lb, respectively. 

Page 36 - The definition section for the equation for EI in Section 7.20.4 incorrectly 

presents the lower case “L” as a “6”. It should read: “ l = Span, mm (in.) ” 

July 23, 2007
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4184 

To require United States assistance for the repair, maintenance, or construction of the transportation infrastructure of Iraq to be provided in the 

form of loans subject to repayment in full to the United States Government. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2004 

Mr. CUMMINGS (for himself and Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on International 

Relations 

A BILL 

To require United States assistance for the repair, maintenance, or construction of the transportation infrastructure of Iraq to be provided in the form of loans subject 

to repayment in full to the United States Government. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE FOR 

4 THE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE OF 

5 IRAQ IN THE FORM OF LOANS. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, amounts 

7 made available after the date of the enactment of this Act 
2 

•HR 4184 IH 

1 for the repair, maintenance, or construction of the trans2 portation infrastructure of Iraq shall be provided in the 

3 form of loans subject to repayment in full to the United 

4 States Government. 

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) by Lotus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Registrant), I, Adam Wasserman, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:  1.
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
  2.
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.
  /s/ Adam WassermanName: Adam WassermanTitle: Chief Financial Officer
  Dated: February 19, 2008
10181.

#### Silver *v.*Collier.

Decided September 19, 1919.

Distraint; from city court of Zebulon—Judge Dupree. August 31, 1918.

Collier sued out a distress warrant to recover from Silver the-rent of a store; and the defendant filed a counter-affidavit in which he claimed damages on account of alleged negligence on the part of the plaintiff in allowing water to run from pipes opening in an office belonging to the plaintiff over the store rented to the defendant. There was testimony as to damage to goods in the store from water which came from the pipes mentioned, and as to the opening of spigots to drain the pipes, and orders by the plaintiff to open them for that purpose, etc. The trial resulted in a verdict against the defendant for the full amount of the plaintiff’s claim.

*J. M.*Smith, for plaintiff in error. *J. B.*Davis, contra.

Stephens, J.

Under the facts of this case it was error for the trial judge to instruct the jury that if the landlord kept the store in good repair he would he entitled to recover.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and*Bloodworth, *J., concur.*
HMM Reference NIST Technical Note 2205: Item 5 Roof Covering (Old Wood Shake) 

Item 5 Roof Covering (Old Wood Shake) – Old wood and cedar roof materials are a high ignition risk.

Note: Selected photographs are included to illustrate each HMM hardening item. Additional vulnerabilities or hardening items may be seen in the photographs, but those are highlighted within their specific HMM item.

Photos pending.
There is no CAD drawing for 

Item 5: Roof Covering (Old Wood Shake) 

Please see photographs for illustrations.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



I, Lorie M. Guerrera, Chief Accounting Officer of Cordia Corporation (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the period March 31, 2005 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By: /s/ Lorie M. Guerrera

_________________________

Lorie M. Guerrera

Chief Accounting Officer



June 16, 2005



* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cordia Corporation and will be retained by Cordia Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.2
 
                        CAPSTAR BROADCASTING CORPORATION
 
            STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PRO FORMA PER SHARE EARNINGS
                 (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
 
   
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                       YEAR ENDED             MARCH 31,
                                                      DECEMBER 31,    --------------------------
                                                          1997           1997           1998
                                                      ------------    -----------    -----------
<S>                                                   <C>             <C>            <C>
Computation for statement of earnings:
  Pro forma net loss attributable to common stock...  $  (108,350)    $   (23,318)   $   (54,436)
                                                      ===========     ===========    ===========
Computation for pro forma weighted average common
  shares outstanding(1):
  Weighted average common shares outstanding(2).....   46,130,912      46,130,912     46,130,912
  Incremental common shares applicable to common
     stock options and warrants based on the
     estimated fair value of the stock..............           --              --             --
  Incremental common shares applicable to
     acquisitions and the Other Equity
     transactions...................................      530,958         530,958        530,958
  Incremental common shares applicable to shares
     issued in connection with the Offering.........   31,000,000      31,000,000     31,000,000
                                                      -----------     -----------    -----------
  Pro forma weighted average common shares..........   77,661,870      77,661,870     77,661,870
                                                      ===========     ===========    ===========
  Pro forma basic and diluted loss per common
     share..........................................  $     (1.39)    $     (0.30)   $     (0.79)
                                                      ===========     ===========    ===========
</TABLE>
    
 
---------------
 
(1) Pro forma earnings per share of common stock is based on the weighted
    average number of shares of common stock equivalents outstanding during the
    period as adjusted for the one for ten reverse stock split.
 
(2) Weighted average common shares outstanding is based upon the common shares
    outstanding as of March 31, 1998. As the common stock was issued within the
    past year in connection with certain transactions, it has been reported as
    outstanding for all periods.
10679.

#### Mann *v.*The State.

Decided October 14, 1919.

Indictment for shooting at another; from Appling superior court —Judge Highsmith. May 10, 1919.

*W. W. Bennett,*for plaintiff in error.

*A. V. Sellers, solicitor-general,*contra.

Bloodwoeth, J.

1. When considered in the light of the facts of this case and the entire charge of the court, the judge did not err in reading to the jury § 95 of the Renal Code of 1910, including the words “provocation by words, threats, menaces, or contemptuous gestures shall in no case be sufficient to free the person killing from the guilt and crime of murder.” *Price*v. *State,*137 *Ga.*71 (7), 74 (72 S. E. 908).

2. The presiding judge was satisfied with the finding of the jury; and this court is not authorized to interfere where there are any facts to support the verdict, and no error of law appears.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Luhe, J., concur.*
#### STATE v. FARRISH

No. 173P97

Case below: 125 N.C.App. 745

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 June 1997.
#### James S. Fish *v.*Eliza Hays.

Attachment — Bounty—Attachment of.

A bounty which was not received fey a soldier in his lifetime, is not subject to seizure in the course of transmission to the person entitled thereto.

APPEAL PROM ROCKCASTLE CIRCUIT COURT.

December 15, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

The bounties granted to the families of deceased soldiers are intended to compensate them in some degree for their bereavement, and the'loss of that aid to which they had a right to look for their support; and in order to make these bounties the more effectual, Congress has provided that they shall not be liable to attachment, levy or seizure by or under any equitable, or legal process what*109ever, but shall remain to the benefit'of the persons intended to be provided for.

*Eastham, for appellant.*

*C. Kirtly, for appellee.*

Even, therefore, if the money which was not received by the father in his lifetime did not pass to the mother on his death, to. which opinion we incline, still we are satisfied it was. not subject to seizure in the course of transmission to the person entitled thereto;

Wherefore the judgment sustaining the demurrer to the petition is *affirmed.*
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SensiVida Medical Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended February 28, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Jose Mir, as President of the Company, and Frank D. Benick, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: June 15, 2011
By:
/s/Jose MirJose MirChief Executive Officer





Date: June 15, 2011
By:
/s/ Frank D. BenickFrank D. BenickChief Financial Officer




This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
 
   
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2
    
 
   
                            ALLEGIANCE TELECOM, INC.
    
 
   
            COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS (LOSS) TO FIXED CHARGES
    
   
        PERIOD FROM INCEPTION (APRIL 22, 1997) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1997
    
 
   
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                             PRO FORMA
                                                                  --------------------------------
                                                                   AS ADJUSTED     AS ADJUSTED FOR
                                                                  FOR THE EQUITY   THE EQUITY AND
                                                      ACTUAL         OFFERING      DEBT OFFERINGS
                                                    -----------   --------------   ---------------
<S>                                                 <C>           <C>              <C>
Earnings:
  Net loss........................................  $(3,687,960)  $(231,325,659)    $(249,637,534)
  Add: Fixed charges..............................           --      22,545,119        40,856,994
                                                    -----------   -------------     -------------
                                                     (3,687,960)   (208,780,540)     (208,780,540)
Fixed charges:
  Interest in indebtedness........................           --      21,691,023        39,501,440
  Amortization of debt discount and debt issuance
     costs........................................           --         854,096         1,355,554
  Interest portion of rental and lease expense....           --              --                --
                                                    -----------   -------------     -------------
                                                             --      22,545,119        40,856,994
Deficiency of earnings available to cover
  fixed charges...................................  $(3,687,960)  $(231,325,659)    $(249,637,534)
                                                    ===========   =============     =============
</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2





INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement of
AMRESCO, INC. on Form S-3 of our report dated February 2, 1998, appearing in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of AMRESCO, INC. for the year ended December 31, 1997
and to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in the Prospectus, which
is part of this Registration Statement.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Dallas, Texas
June 23, 1998