alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4203 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4203

           To suspend temporarily the duty on nitrocellulose.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 22, 2004

  Mr. Coble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on nitrocellulose.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NITROCELLULOSE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.39.13       Cellulose nitrate  Free         Free             No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (nitrocellulose)                                                   31/2007
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3912.20.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
HMM Reference NIST Technical Note 2205: Item 38 Mobile Home Crawl Space Access Hinged Door

Note: Selected photographs are included to illustrate each HMM hardening item. Additional vulnerabilities or hardening items may be seen in the photographs, but those are highlighted within their specific HMM item.

Photos pending.
There is no CAD drawing for 

Item 38: Space Access Hinged Door, Mobile Home 

Please see photographs for illustrations.
No. 87-6387.

#### Smith *v.*Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Corrections.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 426

To prohibit the Federal Communications Commission from requiring digital 

television tuners in television receivers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2003

Mr. SENSENBRENNER (for himself, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. PAUL, Mr. 

COX, and Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To prohibit the Federal Communications Commission from 

requiring digital television tuners in television receivers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘TV Consumer Choice 

5 Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON REQUIRING DIGITAL TELEVISION 

7 TUNERS IN TELEVISION RECEIVERS. 

8 (a) PROHIBITION.—Neither section 303(s) of the 

9 Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 303(s)) nor any 

10 other provision of such Act shall be construed to authorize 
2

•HR 426 IH 

1 the Federal Communications Commission to require, or 

2 prescribe any schedule for the implementation of, digital 

3 television reception capability in television broadcast re4 ception equipment. 

5 (b) COMMISSION ACTIONS NULLIFIED.—The require6 ments and schedule established by the Commission for the 

7 implementation of digital television reception capability in 

8 television broadcast reception equipment as contained in 

9 section 15.117(i) of the Commission’s regulations (47 

10 CFR 15.117(i)) as modified in FCC 02–230 (August 8, 

11 2002), shall not be effective except as expressly hereafter 

12 provided by Act of Congress.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           13994                   23095
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    83712                   80651
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                       2624                    2367
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                104760                  135741
<PP&E>                                         2801801                 2401725
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1616172                 1360003
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1305163                 1295766
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            73677                   85235
<BONDS>                                         448013                  302315
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                          4882                    4842
<OTHER-SE>                                      550358                  613005
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1305163                 1295766
<SALES>                                         187486                  191815
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                191578                  205212
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 60935                   64945
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               13779                   10837
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  38255                   44708
<INCOME-TAX>                                     16066                   18310
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              22189                   26398
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     22189                   26398
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.46                    0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46                    0.55


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4275 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4275

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 
             10-percent individual income tax rate bracket.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4275

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 
             10-percent individual income tax rate bracket.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF 10-PERCENT INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX RATE BRACKET.

    (a) In General.--Clause (i) of section 1(i)(1)(B) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to the initial bracket amount) is 
amended to read as follows:
                            ``(i) $14,000 in the case of subsection 
                        (a),''.
    (b) Inflation Adjustment Beginning in 2004.--Section 1(i)(1)(C) of 
such Code (relating to inflation adjustment) is amended to read as 
follows:
                    ``(C) Inflation adjustment.--In prescribing the 
                tables under subsection (f) which apply with respect to 
                taxable years beginning in calendar years after 2003--
                            ``(i) the cost-of-living adjustment used in 
                        making adjustments to the initial bracket 
                        amount shall be determined under subsection 
                        (f)(3) by substituting `2002' for `1992' in 
                        subparagraph (B) thereof, and
                            ``(ii) such adjustment shall not apply to 
                        the amount referred to in subparagraph 
                        (B)(iii).
                If any amount after adjustment under the preceding 
                sentence is not a multiple of $50, such amount shall be 
                rounded to the next lowest multiple of $50.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2003.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SUNSET.

    Title IX of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act 
of 2001 shall not apply to--
                    (1) paragraph (1) of section 1(i) of the Internal 
                Revenue Code of 1986, and
                    (2) the amendments made by paragraphs (1) and (7) 
                of section 101(c) of such Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 13, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<LEGEND>
"This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Resort
Income Investors, Inc.'s Form 10-QSB for the nine months ended September
30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-
QSB."
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,737,216 
<SECURITIES>                                   388,412 
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,867,000 
<ALLOWANCES>                                15,867,000 
<INVENTORY>                                       0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,297,320 
<PP&E>                                            0    
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,297,320 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          147,455 
<BONDS>                                           0    
<COMMON>                                     4,149,865 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0    
<PREFERRED>                                       0    
<OTHER-SE>                                        0    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,297,320 
<SALES>                                           0    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,937 
<CGS>                                             0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0    
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               721,662 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (651,725)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0    
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0    
<CHANGES>                                         0    
<NET-INCOME>                                  (651,725)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.16)

<FN>

NOTE:   The above captions are specified in Exhibit 27, and contemplate
that the entity is a going concern.  As discussed in Note 1 to the
Company's unaudited financial statements, the Company is in the process of
liquidation as of September 30, 1997.  The amounts above are presented with
the caption that, in management's judgment, most closely correlates to
respective financial statement captions used in the Company's financial
statements.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.2

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

                                  July 17, 2001

We hereby consent to the use in this Form 10-K of our report dated June 14, 2000
(except Note O, which is July 13, 2000, Note E, which is July 19, 2000, and Note
13, which is July 5, 2001) relating to the audits of the consolidated financial
statements of Cox Technologies, Inc., and to the references to our firm under
the captions "Selected Financial Data" and "Experts" as of April 30, 2000 and
for the years ended April 30, 2000 and 1999 (File No. 333-52738).



                                             /s/ Bedinger & Company

                                             Bedinger & Company
                                             Certified Public Accountants
                                             Walnut Creek, California
#### Denzer *vs.*Mundy.

1. An attachment cannot be sustained against the property of a debtor upon an allegation of the removal of the property of such debtor from his store by a‘ third person claiming to be his assignee, merely because there is no assignment filed in the clerk’s office, although a general charge of a fraudulent assignment by the debtor, to cheat and defraud Ms creditors, is sworn to.

2. The mere allegation of a belief of the plaintiff of the fraudulent intent ofrthe defendant in removing such goods, which removal he is superintending, or of a fraudulent assignment in general terms, does not furnish grounds for judicial action.

3. A neglect to record an assignment within the statutory period fixed therefor, does not make it fraudulent.

(Before Robeetsob, Ch. X at special term.)

Heard August 21, 1866;

decided August —, 1866.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7387

SHAE GWAVIRA WILLIAMS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

SEWALL SMITH, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA98-1715-PJM)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 7, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shae Gwavira Williams, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See Williams v. Smith, No. CA-98-1715-PJM

(D. Md. Aug. 24, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

March 23, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00158-CV

IN RE CRISTINO RUVALCABA, JR., AS TRUSTEE OF THE JUAN 

CARLOS RUVALCABA IRREVOCABLE TRUST; ELAM MEAT 

MARKET, LLC; LONGVIEW MEAT MARKET, LLC; AND 

SUPERMERCADO LATINO, LLC, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

507th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2021-34821

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On March 8, 2023, relators Cristino Ruvalcaba, Jr., As Trustee of the Juan 

Carlos Ruvalcaba Irrevocable Trust; Elam Meat Market, LLC; Longview Meat 

Market, LLC; and Supermercado Latino, LLC filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. 
2

App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this Court to compel the Honorable Julia 

Maldonado, presiding judge of the 507th District Court of Harris County, to vacate 

her November 28, 2022 order denying relators’ motion to transfer venue.

On March 14, 2023, relators filed an unopposed motion to dismiss their 

petition for writ of mandamus. Accordingly, we grant realtors’ unopposed motion. 

Relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed. Additionally, the motion to

dismiss filed by real party in interest Laura Ruvalcaba is dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Hassan, and Poissant.
#### Mary Doyle *vs.*Frank O’Farrell.

At special term, August, 1866.

Before Robertson, Ch. J.

Delays in bringing on the trial of issues, caused by frequent promises of the defendant to settle, are not a good ground for dismissing the complaint for want of prosecution.

2?. *Brown,*for the defendant.

*O. A. Some,*for the plaintiff.

Decided August 15, 1866.
**Exhibit 32.B**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mercantile BanksharesCorporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2006, (the “Report”)as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Terry L. Troupe, theChief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to and for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 206 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Terry L. Troupe     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Terry L. Troupe         |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                    |   |
| Date: March 1,  2007    |   |

 

----
From: Lena Smart 

Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 7:48 AM

To: CSF-SCRM-RFI <CSF-SCRM-RFI@nist.gov>

Subject: “RFI: Evaluating and Improving Cybersecurity Resources: The Cybersecurity Framework and 

Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management”

I have two recommendations for the NIST CSF update:

1. Include the SBOM requirement as part of the IDENTIFY bucket - if every Government Agency is going 

to ask for an SBOM then we should be measuring where we are with that request.

2. Somewhat tangential but along the same lines - SBOMs should be part of the FedRAMP SSP.

I would like to be part of any working groups you setup to work on the overhaul of the CSF, as I was part 

of the original workgroups in 2014 and very much enjoyed that collaboration.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          21,817
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,324
<ALLOWANCES>                                        50
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,677
<PP&E>                                         103,764
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,184
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  81,257
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,735
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           489
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,565
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    81,257
<SALES>                                         30,583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,518
<CGS>                                           10,080
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,760
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,677
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,758
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,804
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,954
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,954
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.04


</TABLE>
Exhibit
        10.9

      


      NEC
        Partnership

      101
        High
        Street

      Westwood,
        MA 02090

      


      October
        13, 2005

      


      Chinmay
        Chatterjee, CEO

      Integrated
        Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

      310
        Authority Drive

      Fitchburg,
        MA 01420

      


      
        	
                Re:
                  

              	
                Amendment
                  to First Amendment and Restated Patent License Agreement (the
                  “License”)

              


      

      


      Dear
        Mr.
        Chatterjee:

      


      On
        behalf
        of NEC Partnership, the Licensor under the above-referenced License, we hereby
        agree to modify section 5.4 of the License:

      


      
        	 	
                1.

              	
                by
                  waiving any right to royalties in any year in which the sales of
                  Licensed
                  Products is less than $5 million; and

              
	 	
                2.

              	
                by
                  waiving any right to royalties in any year in which the EBITDA
                  of the
                  Company from the sale of Licensed Products is less than 12.5% of
                  the
                  Company’s revenues from the sale of Licensed
                  Products.

              


      

       

      To
        indicate the acceptance of Integrated Pharmaceuticals Inc. to these revised
        terms, please sign the acceptance line below.

      


      Very
        truly yours,

      


      NEC
        PARTNERSHIP

      /s/
        Edward D. Furtado____

      Edward
        D.
        Furtado, Partner

       

      


      ACCEPTED
        AND AGREED:

      


      INTEGRATED
        PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

      /s/
        Chinmay Chatterjee____ 

      By:
        Chinmay Chatterjee

      Its:
        CEO