alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 216TH JUDICIA L DISTRICT COURT OF KERR COUNTY, GREETIN GS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on July 19, 2017, the cause upon appeal to revise

or revers e your judgment between

In the Interest of D.B.M., a Child, Appellant

V.

No. 04

- 17

- 00064

- CV and Tr. Ct. No. 16246A

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:



## In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. No costs are assessed because appellant is indigent.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on September 27, 2017

.
KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLE RK

____________________________ Cyn thia A. Martinez Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853BILL OF COSTS



### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04

- 17

- 00064

- CV

In the Interest of D.B.M., a Child

v.

(NO. 16246A IN 216TH JUDI CIAL DISTRICT COURT OF KERR COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES P AID BY
REPORTER'S RECORD FILING $388.70 $205.00 PAID INDIGENT KERR COUNTY INDIGENT

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

**Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.**

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLE RK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and
paymen ts, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the Fourth District of Texas, this September 27, 2017

.

K EITH E. HOTTLE, CLER K

____________________________ Cynthia A. Martinez Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
Exhibit 23.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors

Plug Power Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-41863, 333-72841, 333-76817) and Form S-3 (Nos. 333-112464), and Form S-1 (No. 333-121868) of Mechanical Technology Incorporated of our report dated February 7, 2003, except as to Note 15, which is as of March 25, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Plug Power Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2 to the annual report on Form 10-K) of Mechanical Technology Incorporated for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Our report refers to cumulative consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the period June 27, 1997 (inception) to December 31, 2002 which include amounts for the period from June 27, 1997 (inception) to December 31, 1997 and for each of the years in the three-year period ending December 31, 2000, which were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for the period June 27, 1997 through December 31, 2000 is based solely on the report of other auditors.

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

 

Albany, New York

March 21, 2005
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-10201

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CHADRICK DESHAWN MCBRIDE,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:18-CR-20-9

Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Chadrick Deshawn McBride has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). McBride has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently 

developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of McBride’s claims of 

ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 4, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-10201 Document: 00515223249 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/04/2019
No. 19-10201

2

without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 

841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as McBride’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 19-10201 Document: 00515223249 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/04/2019
**Exhibit 32**

 

TEMPCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tempco, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Stanley L. Schloz, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| By:    | /s/ Stanley L. Schloz                                         |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Stanley L. Schloz                                             |
|   | President,Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | October 20, 2008                                         |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4222 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 4222

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 2004

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 550 Nebraska Avenue in Kansas City, Kansas, as the ``Newell George 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 550 
Nebraska Avenue in Kansas City, Kansas, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Newell George Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Newell George Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 21, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00384

- CR

S TEPHEN M ELVIN B ONDS

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ O n Appeal from the 78th District Court

of Wichita County ( 61,080

- B )

April 1, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was error in the trial court’s jud g ment. The judgment is modified to accurately re flect

an enhanced first

- degree

- fel on y offen s e. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed as modified

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack

Just ice Dana Womack
NVLAP LAB BULLETIN NUMBER: LB-123-2020 PAGE: 1 of 1

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology

National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

ISSUE DATE:

May 19, 2020

LAB BULLETIN

NUMBER: LB-123-2020

LAP: Thermal Insulation 

Materials

SUBJECT: Release of NIST Handbook 150-15, 2020 Edition

NIST Handbook 150-15, which presents the technical requirements and guidance for the 

accreditation of laboratories under the NVLAP Thermal Insulation Materials LAP, has been 

revised. 

The following are the primary changes that have been made with this revision of 

Handbook 150-15:

• the numbering has been updated to reflect that used by ISO/IEC 17025:2017, General 

requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.

 

• requirements that closely duplicated existing requirements in either ISO/IEC 17025 or NIST 

Handbook 150 have been removed.

The 2020 edition of NIST Handbook 150-15 supersedes and replaces the 2006 edition effective 

immediately. It is available for downloading (PDF format) from the NVLAP website 

<http://www.nist.gov/nvlap> under NVLAP Program-Specific Handbooks. The corresponding 

NIST Handbook 150-15 Checklist (ISO/IEC 17025:2017) has also been updated and posted on 

the NVLAP website under NVLAP Publications and Forms.

Questions concerning the revised handbook or requirements for accreditation should be directed 

to Timothy Rasinski at 301-975-6697, or <timothy.rasinski@nist.gov>.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             441
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,981
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         931,762
<DEPRECIATION>                                 121,302
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 866,256
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        409,552
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           274  
<OTHER-SE>                                     372,576
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   866,256
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,205
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,290
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,546
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,369
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,590
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1




                                                                   Exhibit 10.25


                              TERMINATION AGREEMENT


       THIS TERMINATION AGREEMENT dated as of July 2, 1997 is entered into by
and between TCC Industries, Inc., a Texas corporation, formerly named TeleCom
Corporation, (the "Company") and Frank W.
Denius ("Denius").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

        WHEREAS, the Company and Denius have agreed that the Consulting and
Noncompetition Agreement (the "Consulting Agreement") dated as of May 10, 1994
entered into between them, should be terminated on the terms and conditions set
forth herein.

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the mutual covenants
and agreements herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and adequacy of which are expressly acknowledged by the parties by their
execution and delivery hereof, the undersigned hereby agree as follows:

1.      The Consulting Agreement is hereby terminated in its entirety, including
        without limitation the obligations of the Company to make payments to
        Denius as therein provided upon his ceasing to be a member of the Board
        of Directors of the Company and the obligation of Denius to render
        consulting services and not to compete with the Company upon his ceasing
        to be such a member.

2.      The Company agrees that it will exercise, to the extent that it is
        entitled to do so, its option to elect the "discovery clause" under its
        Officer's and Director's Liability Insurance policy, so as to extend
        coverage for an additional twelve month period at a cost of 75% of the
        annual premium on such policy, such option to be exercised as provided
        in such policy in the event the Company elects not to renew such policy
        or replace such policy with similar coverage, or such policy is
        terminated or not renewed by the insurer.

3.      This Termination Agreement may be executed in counterparts, all of which
        taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. In making
        proof hereof, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for any
        counterpart other than one signed by the party against which enforcement
        is sought.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound,
have duly executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.

                                                THE COMPANY:
                                                TCC Industries, Inc.

                                                        /s/ ROBERT THOMAJAN
                                                By:
                                                Name: Robert Thomajan
                                                Title:  President


                                                DENIUS:
                                                        /s/ FRANK W. DENIUS

                                                Frank W. Denius



                                       51
From: Margaret Murphy <mamurphy@utica.edu>

Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 4:12 PM

To: privacyframework <privacyframework@nist.gov>

Subject: NIST Privacy Framework: Preliminary Draft Comments

National Institute of Standards and Technology

100 Bureau Drive, Stop 2000

Gaithersburg, MD 20899

National Institute of Standards and Technology,

This letter is in regard to providing preliminary draft comments, for the NIST Privacy Framework: 

A Tool for Improving Privacy 87 through Enterprise Risk Management.

The principles within the draft that are focused on addressing diverse privacy needs are 

excellent, and show a strong foundation through the incorporation of (1) the design and 

deployment of systems, products and services, (2) the integration of privacy practices within 

business practices, and (3) the effective communication about these practices.

The NIST Privacy Framework also shows a strength by incorporating cross-organization 

collaboration and adaptability within each organization. The primary components of the NIST 

Privacy Framework: (1) Core, (2) Profiles and (3) Implementation Tiers; reinforce risk 

management within the scientific industry as well as the government. The Implementation Tier is 

an important component within each industry's review process, and could become a 

measurement for industry specific risk informed responses.

The NIST Privacy Framework also includes important components that define privacy in terms 

of (1) Cybersecurity Risks and (2) Privacy Risks. Cybersecurity Risks are defined as risks that 

are associated with a loss of confidentiality, integrity or availability. Privacy Risks are defined as 

risks that are associated with unintended consequences of data processing. This seems to be 

an important differentiation, because of the current debates in the field that are based on the 

extent of privacy that should be accorded to each individual. Through an updated definition of 

privacy, the dedication to develop secure technology can continue, without being stopped by 

debates in the field.

The inclusion of the Privacy Risk Assessment is also an excellent method to address security 

risks. The focus on identifying, evaluating, prioritizing and responding to specific privacy risks 

will help organizations to determine appropriate responses, which can reduce response time. By 

reducing response time, organizations can leverage their response procedures with remediation 

procedures, and make the attack surface less penetrable.

Privacy Risk Assessments are also a valuable consideration because they can help an 

organization to understand the values to protect, the methods to employ, and the way to 

balance the implementation of different types of measures.

As an early career researcher, in the process of applying to my PhD, I appreciate the 

importance of protecting sensitive information and scientific research; and how sometimes the 

two are part of the same organization. Thank you for publishing the NIST Privacy Framework, 

so that scientists can also review the NIST structure and incorporate these components within 

their work.

Best Regards,

Margaret Murphy
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                         <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997             JAN-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997             JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                       9,070,976               7,415,735
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,570,528               8,941,157
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (232,986)               (194,972)
<INVENTORY>                                 10,597,813              10,302,844
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,088,546              28,268,561
<PP&E>                                      28,496,676              26,778,640
<DEPRECIATION>                            (14,149,681)            (12,345,075)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,079,391              47,626,587
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,374,115              10,250,506
<BONDS>                                      5,268,506               2,871,139
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       713,862                 475,922
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,639,064              34,536,656
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                56,079,391              47,626,587
<SALES>                                     60,853,278              54,067,320
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            60,853,278              54,067,320
<CGS>                                       40,157,752              35,625,610
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               51,696,147              46,403,363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             300,170                 266,113
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,076,036               8,225,017
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,980,034               3,331,132
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,096,002               4,893,885
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,096,002               4,893,885
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .86                     .69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .86                     .69
        

</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4289

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the low-income housing 

credit without regard to whether moderate rehabilitation assistance is 

provided with respect to a building. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2004

Mr. LUCAS of Oklahoma introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the 

low-income housing credit without regard to whether 

moderate rehabilitation assistance is provided with respect to a building.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4289 IH 

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF LOW-INCOME HOUSING CREDIT 

2 DISQUALIFICATION FOR BUILDINGS RECEIV3 ING MODERATE REHABILITATION ASSIST4 ANCE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 42(c) of 

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining qualified low7 income building) is amended by striking the last sentence. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

10 of this Act.

Æ