alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4301

To authorize an additional district judgeship for the district of Nebraska. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2004

Mr. TERRY (for himself, Mr. BEREUTER, and Mr. OSBORNE) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To authorize an additional district judgeship for the district 

of Nebraska.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DISTRICT JUDGESHIP FOR THE DISTRICT OF 

4 NEBRASKA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The President shall appoint, by 

6 and with the advice and consent of the Senate, 1 addi7 tional district judge for the district of Nebraska. 

8 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—

9 In order that the table contained in section 133(a) of title 

10 28, United States Code, will reflect the change in the num11 ber of judgeships authorized by subsection (a), such table 
2

•HR 4301 IH 

1 is amended by striking the item relating to Nebraska and 

2 inserting the following:

‘‘Nebraska ..................................... 4’’.

Æ
Evaluation of Latent Fin

Technologies 2007 (EL

AFIS Committee Meet

IAI

28 February 2007

Vladimir Dvornychenko
Sponsors

This work is sponsored by the Department of Homeland Security, Science and Technology Directora(S & T).We would like to expressly thank BCoursey of that organization
NIST’s Interest in Biom

• A core component of NIST’s mis

assessment of technology, estabmetrics, and the setting of stand
USA Patriot Act

• The USA Patriot Act specifically mandated th

certify a standard for verifying the identity of pvisa or seeking to enter the United States, antechnical support to the Attorney General and evaluation of biometric identification systems 

System for U.S. borders. 

• Since that time, other agencies, including the 

Homeland Security (DHS), Federal Bureau of and the U. S. Dept. of Justice (DOJ), have soguidance from NIST in several evaluations of which may be considered for homeland secu
Overall Project Go

Test Current 

Systems

Establish 

Performance &

Limitations

Technology

Improvements
Extending SDK Testing 

• Like to extend performance testing to • Make tests as automated as possible 

– Simplify testing logistics– Protect vendor proprietary data– Protect Data– Decouple the performance of the automat

performance of latent examiners to the gr

• These requirements suggest

– SDK (= Software Development Kit)– “Lights-out” testing 
Representative Latent Fin

Good Bad

Excellent
Schematic of ELFT-

PublishConcept of Operations(CONOPS)and Software API.Create and maintainWebsite.

Phases I and II Tests --Execute submitted Software (SDK)using NIST Computers aTest Sets.

Create/Compile

Latent Test Sets
ELFT in Outyears (20

Phases I and II 

Testing (Latents 

against rolled

ten-prints)

(2007)

Latents against 

mixed rolled and 

flats 

(Phase III – 2008)

Large Background

(Phase IV – 2008)

Single Latent 

Matched against 

Rolled + Plain

(dual data)

Augmented 

Features

(CDEFFS and other 

advanced matching) 

concepts – 2008+)

Core Testing

Augmented Features/Advanced Matchers Testing

Supplemental Testing

2007 2008
• Contributors/Team

– Mike Garris– Patrick Grother– Mike Indovina– Craig Watson– Stephen Wood
Addition Informati

• Fingerprints 

Î http://fingerpr

• ELFT 

Î

http://fingerprint.nist.gov/late

• Workshop 

Î

http://www.itl.nist.gov/iad/894ndex.html

• vdvorny@nist.gov
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JOSE JAVIER RUIZ-PELAYO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-30206

D.C. No. 4:08-CR-00148-SEH

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 25, 2010** 

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Jose Javier Ruiz-Pelayo appeals from the 70-month sentence imposed

following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to

FILED

JUN 10 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-30206

distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Ruiz-Pelayo contends that the district court procedurally erred by neglecting

to meaningfully consider and address all of the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3553(a). Specifically, Ruiz-Pelayo contends that the district court failed to

specifically address his mitigating arguments and that it attached too much weight

to the Guidelines range. The record reflects that the district court provided a

reasoned sentencing explanation and did not otherwise procedurally err. See

United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc); see also

United States v. Diaz-Argueta, 564 F.3d 1047, 1051-52 (9th Cir. 2009). 

Ruiz-Pelayo also contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. 

The record demonstrates that, under the totality of the circumstances, RuizPelayo’s 70-month sentence is substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United States,

552 U.S. 38, 51-52 (2007); see also United States v. Nichols, 464 F.3d 1117, 1124

(9th Cir. 2006) (“[T]he question before us is not the reasonableness of [the

defendant’s] and the government’s requested sentence, but rather whether the 

ultimate sentence imposed is reasonable.”) (internal quotations omitted).

AFFIRMED.
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Mexco Energy Corporation; |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| January 28, 2011 | /s/ Tamala L. McComic                                                                 |   |
|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|             | Tamala L. McComic                                                                     |   |
|             | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, Treasurer, and Assistant Secretary |   |
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christopher R. Huber, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc.



|                      |  |        |  |                                                                                       
|--------------------- |  | ------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 30, 2006 |  | By:    |  | /s/    CHRISTOPHER R.
HUBER                                                           
|                      |  | Name:  |  | Christopher R. Huber                                                                  
|                      |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Operations (Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 31.1
IEA Income Fund IX, L.P.
Rule 13a-14 CERTIFICATION
     I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IEA Income Fund IX, L.P. (the“Partnership”);
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Partnership as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;
     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), the General Partner of thePartnership, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Partnership and wehave:
          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Partnership, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;and
          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, based on our evaluation; and
          (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Partnership’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Partnership’s most recent fiscal quarter (thePartnership’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financialreporting.
     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Partnership’s auditors and the Audit Committeeof Partnership’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thePartnership’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 13, 2005   /s/ DENNIS J TIETZ     Dennis J Tietz  President of CCC  (Chief Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 32**

 

PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, the Corporate Trustee of Mesabi Trust, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, theAnnual Report of Mesabi Trust on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31,2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information containedin such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of Mesabi Trust.

 
| /s/ Kenneth R. Ring                       | ** ** | April 16, 2009 |
|-------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------|
| Kenneth R. Ring*                          |       |                |
| Vice President                            |       |                |
| Deutsche Bank National  Trust Company     |       |                |
| For Deutsche Bank Trust  Company Americas |       |                |

 

----

* There are no principal executive officers orprincipal financial officers of the registrant.

 

*A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MesabiTrust and will be retained by Mesabi Trust and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4487 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4487

          To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,2 Pentanediol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 2, 2004

 Mr. Brown of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,2 Pentanediol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 1,2 PENTANEDIOL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following:

``      9902.34.33       1,2 Pentanediol    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (CAS No. 5343-02-                                                  31/2007
                         0) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2905.39.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

I, Stephen M. Shea, Chief Financial Officer of Mestek, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 2 for the year ended December 31, 2005, of Mestek, Inc. (the “registrant”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

 (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

 (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 1, 2006
|   | /s/  Stephen M. Shea             |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Stephen M. Shea 
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.03


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
report dated April 23, 1997 (except for Note 5 as to which the date is June 27,
1997 and Note 14 as to which the date is January 16, 1998), with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Station Casinos, Inc. as of March 31, 1997
and 1996 and for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 1997
(and to all references to our Firm) included in or made a part of this
registration statement.


                                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada
April 15, 1998
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4412

To amend the Clayton Act to clarify the application of the antitrust laws 

in the telecommunications industry. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2004

Mr. SENSENBRENNER (for himself and Mr. CONYERS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend the Clayton Act to clarify the application of the 

antitrust laws in the telecommunications industry.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clarification of Anti5 trust Remedies in Telecommunications Act of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

7 The Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12 et seq.) is amended 

8 by inserting after section 3 the following: 

9 ‘‘SEC. 3A. (a) It shall be unlawful for an incumbent 

10 local exchange carrier or an affiliate to create or to pre-
2

•HR 4412 IH 

1 serve (or to attempt to create or to preserve) a monopoly 

2 in any part of commerce by using its network (or by pro3 viding a service over its network) to engage in an anti4 competitive practice (which may include a failure to com5 ply with either section 251(c) or 271 of the Communica6 tions Act of 1934 or with any agreement, rule, or order 

7 in effect under such section). 

8 ‘‘(b) For purposes of this section—

9 ‘‘(1) the term ‘affiliate’ has the meaning given 

10 such term in section 274(i) of the Communications 

11 Act of 1934; and 

12 ‘‘(2) the term ‘incumbent local exchange car13 rier’ means a Bell operating company as defined in 

14 section 274(i) of the Communications Act of 1934. 

15 ‘‘(c) Whether any agency regulates or is authorized 

16 to consider, review, or redress the conduct proscribed by 

17 this section shall not affect the applicability of this section, 

18 except that conduct required by an agency regulation or 

19 rule shall not be construed to create liability under this 

20 section.’’. 

21 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT. 

22 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub23 section (b), this Act and the amendment made by this Act 

24 shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. 
3

•HR 4412 IH 

1 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.—Subsection (a) 

2 of section 3A of the Clayton Act, as added by this Act, 

3 shall not apply with respect to a person’s conduct occur4 ring before the effective date of this Act.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4376 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4376

  To amend the Small Business Act to establish funding priorities for 
             women's business centers for fiscal year 2004.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2004

Mrs. Kelly (for herself, Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut, Mr. Michaud, Ms. 
  Slaughter, Ms. Majette, and Mr. Udall of New Mexico) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Small Business Act to establish funding priorities for 
             women's business centers for fiscal year 2004.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Women's Sustainability Recovery Act 
of 2004''.

SEC. 2. FUNDING PRIORITIES FOR WOMEN'S BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTERS FOR 
              FISCAL YEAR 2004.

    (a) Reservation of Funds for Sustainability Grants.--
Notwithstanding section 29(k)(4)(B) of the Small Business Act (15 
U.S.C. 656(k)(4)(B)), 48 percent of the total amount made available for 
fiscal year 2004 for grants under section 29 of such Act shall be 
reserved by the Administrator of the Small Business Administration for 
sustainability grants under section 29(l) of such Act.
    (b) Maximum Amount of Sustainability Grants.--The amount of funding 
made available by the Administrator of the Small Business 
Administration under section 29(l) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
656(l)) to any women's business center for fiscal year 2004 shall not 
exceed $125,000.
    (c) Amount of Continuation Grants.--The amount of funding made 
available for fiscal year 2004 by the Administrator of the Small 
Business Administration under section 29(b) of the Small Business Act 
(15 U.S.C. 656(b)) to any women's business center that also received 
funding under such section for fiscal year 2003 shall be equal to the 
lesser of--
            (1) $150,000, or
            (2) the amount requested by such women's business center.
                                 <all>
```