alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3856 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3856

 To limit the congressional redistricting that States may do after an 
                             apportionment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2004

Mr. Green of Texas (for himself, Mr. Lampson, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson 
of Texas, Mr. Reyes, Mr. Stenholm, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Mr. Frost, 
  Mr. Ortiz, Mr. Sandlin, Mr. Rodriguez, Mr. Gonzalez, Mr. Turner of 
Texas, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Bell, Mr. Doggett, and Mr. Hinojosa) introduced 
    the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To limit the congressional redistricting that States may do after an 
                             apportionment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Redistricting Integrity Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMIT ON CONGRESSIONAL REDISTRICTING AFTER AN APPORTIONMENT.

    The Act entitled ``An Act for the relief of Doctor Ricardo Vallejo 
Samala and to provide for congressional redistricting'', approved 
December 14, 1967 (2 U.S.C. 2c), is amended by adding at the end the 
following: ``A State which has been redistricted in the manner provided 
by law after an apportionment under section 22(a) of the Act entitled 
`An Act to provide for the fifteenth and subsequent decennial censuses 
and to provide for an apportionment of Representatives in Congress', 
approved June 18, 1929 (2 U.S.C. 2a), may not be redistricted again 
until after the next apportionment of Representatives under such 
section, unless a Federal court requires the State to conduct such 
subsequent redistricting to comply with the Constitution or to enforce 
the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1973 et seq.).''.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered September 2 4 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00456
- CV
VILLAGE CRESTMONT HO USTON USA, L.L.C. AN D WEST CRESTMONT

HOUSTON USA, L.L.C., Appellant s

V. JOSE J. GAITAN, INDI VIDUALLY AND D/B/A E C & J REMODELING & PAINTIN G, Appellee On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 14
- 08108



### O RDER Before the Court is Matthew Paul Nickson’s September 22, 2015 motion to withdraw and for a thirty day extension of the briefing deadline. We GRANT Mr. Nickson’s request to withdraw and DIRECT the Clerk to remove him as counsel of record for appellants. Because corporations may only appear in this Court through an attorney, we ORDER appellants to notify the Court, within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order, of new counsel’s name, State Bar number, mailing and email addresses, and telephone and fax numbers. Until appellants retain counsel, all future communications to appellants regarding this appeal shall be sen t to their authorized agent as follows: Mr. Abraham Vaknin99 Roberts Road

Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632 (914) 260

- 3665.
We GRANT Mr. Nickson’s extension request to the extent we suspend the briefing deadline. Once an appearance of counsel is made f or appellants, a new deadline will be set for appellants’ brief. We caution appellants that failure to obtain counsel within the timeframe provided will result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice.

.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

            NATIONAL BANCSHARES CORPORATION OF TEXAS AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  1998                                      1997
                                                ---------------------------------------   ---------------------------------------
                                                  Income         Shares       Per-Share     Income         Shares       Per-Share
                                                (Numerator)   (Denominator)    Amount     (Numerator)   (Denominator)    Amount
                                                -----------   -------------   ---------   -----------   -------------   ---------
<S>                                             <C>           <C>             <C>         <C>           <C>             <C>
Net income                                      $     3,261                               $     2,617

BASIC EPS
Income available
  to common shareholders                        $     3,261           4,659   $    0.70   $     2,617           4,659   $    0.56
                                                                              =========                                 =========

EFFECT OF DILUTIVE SECURITIES
  Stock options                                                         123                                        75
                                                              -------------                             -------------

DILUTIVE EPS
Income available to common shareholders
  + assumed conversions                         $     3,261           4,782   $    0.68   $     2,617           4,734   $    0.55
                                                ===========   =============   =========   ===========   =============   =========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          31,798
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  133,973
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,916
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               239,340
<PP&E>                                         235,137
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,815
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,710,928
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          348,979
<BONDS>                                      1,122,802
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          283,578
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,131
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,766,083
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,710,928
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               175,997
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  177,122
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,315)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,050
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,813
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,673)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,613)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (28,463)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  7,305
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (35,768)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### George A. Richards v. Anna A. Richards.

*Divorce not granted on evidence drawn out by leading questions.*

Where testimony in a divorce suit is largely drawn out by leading questions and goes but little beyond the points suggested b.y them, it deserves very little credence.

Appeal from Calhoun.

Submitted June 8.

Decided June 14.

Bill for divorce. Complainant appeals.

Dismissal affirmed.

b *James R. Robinson*and *Clapp <& Reynolds*for complainants.

*Briggs & Cla/rh*for defendant.

Campbell, J.

Complainant filed his bill against defendant for a divorce on the ground of cruelty. It would serve no good purpose to discuss the facts at length. We are of opinion on all the testimony that he has failed to make out a case, and that a considerable part of the charges against her derive no support from proofs worthy of credit. The case shows the existence of a state of things involving probably shortcomings on both sides, but as the record appears *531to us tbe trouble bas arisen chiefly from the wickedness of mischief-makers, furthered by the weakness of character and unfounded jealousy of the complainant. There is not the slightest reason to impugn the defendant’s virtue, and we have not discovered any evidence of cruelty, or any reason to believe her temper any more exasperating than the conduct of complainant and his friends and relatives, which creates a very unpleasant impression.

We cannot forbear saying that testimony of matters largely drawn out by leading questions and going but slightly, if at all, beyond the points suggested by them, deserves in such cases as this very little credence, and that there is considerable testimony which is grossly exaggerated and deriving such little force as it has from malicious hearsay. From such glimpses as we get into the affairs of the household we feel much impressed with the belief that if the husband had been a man who paid more attention to his duties, and less to the prejudices and slanders of sour and unfriendly meddlers, we should never have heard of this controversy.

The decree dismissing the bill must be affirmed with costs, and with an allowance of one hundred dollars.

Graves, C. J. and Cooley, J. concurred.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
   
     We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to
the use of our reports dated (i) February 10, 1997 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Commodore Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries,
(ii) February 3, 1997 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Southern Star Communications, Inc., formerly known as Osborn Communications
Corporation, and (iii) March 5, 1998, except for Notes 2 and 14 as to which the
date is April 27, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
SFX Broadcasting Inc. and Subsidiaries, all included in Amendment No. 2 to the
Registration Statement (Form S-1, No. 333-48819) and related Prospectus of
Capstar Broadcasting Corporation for the registration of shares of its common
stock.
    
 
                                            ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
New York, New York
   
May 8, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          254
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  0
<PP&E>                                            0
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             0
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      340
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    361
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                123
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    39
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  6
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  84
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              84
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                     84
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  9.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Associates First Capital Corporation on Form S-3 (File No. 333-   ) of our
report dated January 20, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of Associates First Capital Corporation as of December 31, 1997 and
1996, and for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996, and 1995, which report
is included in Associates First Capital Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1997.  We also consent to the reference to our
firm under the caption "Experts."
                                        /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
                                        -------------------------------
                                           PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 


Dallas, Texas
September 4, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,066,773
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,311,470
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,450,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 12,680,191
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      12,680,191
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        12,680,191
<LOANS>                                     23,010,235
<ALLOWANCE>                                    260,175
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,924,064
<DEPOSITS>                                  37,681,020
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,280,620
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            258,461
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,075,305
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,628,658
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              41,924,064
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,033,200
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              429,924
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                81,983
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,545,107
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             546,755
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             598,993
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          946,114
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   19,788
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                806,588
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                298,215
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     196,822
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   196,822
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.37
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                     22,985
<LOANS-PAST>                                   263,695
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      184
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,200
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Standard Operating Procedure

North Carolina Standards Laboratory

SOP 71

Use of Water Triple Point Cells

Printed copies of this document are considered uncontrolled.

Document ID 44436 Revision 3 Approved by

Page 1 of 1 Issued By NCDA&CS Published

Provided as a resource for laboratories performing thermometry calibrations on 23 July 2021 by the 

North Carolina Metrology Laboratory. Changes made to this document after this date were not 

authorized nor approved by North Carolina metrology staff.

Using the procedure provided in ASTM E1750-10: Standard Guide for Use of Water Triple Point Cells as a 

guide, the following differences from the published procedure have been established for use in the 

laboratory. 

7.1.12. Stabilization of the cell when placed into an ice bath should be allowed for an overnight time 

period. While every Triple Point of Water cell may display individual behavior specific to the cell, no 

meaningful differences have been observed after allowing the cell to stabilize overnight and obtaining 

subsequent daily readings.

8.3. Aluminum bushings should be used with caution. On some occasions, the aluminum bushing will act 

as a catalyst to cause the liquid in the Thermometer Well (Precision Bora) to freeze.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4404

To suspend temporarily the duty on Benzamide, 3-amino-N-[2-[[2-

(sulfooxy)ethyl]sulfonyl]ethyl]-. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2004

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Benzamide, 3-aminoN-[2-[[2-(sulfooxy)ethyl]sulfonyl]ethyl]-.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.01.03 Benzamide, 3-amino-N-[2-

[[2-

(sulfooxy)ethyl]sulfonyl]ethyl]- (CAS 

No. 121315–20–6) (provided 

for in subheading 

2930.90.29) ......................... Free Free No change On or before 

12/31/07 ’’. 
2

•HR 4404 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4271

To require the Secretary of State, in consultation with the heads of other 

appropriate departments and agencies, to conduct an economic impact 

study on the dual gateway policy of the Government of Ireland before 

the United States takes any action that could lead to the discontinuation 

of the policy. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 4, 2004

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. HYDE, Mr. KING

of New York, and Mr. PAYNE) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on International Relations 

A BILL

To require the Secretary of State, in consultation with the 

heads of other appropriate departments and agencies, 

to conduct an economic impact study on the dual gateway policy of the Government of Ireland before the 

United States takes any action that could lead to the 

discontinuation of the policy.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Dual Gateway Policy 

5 Review Act’’. 
2

•HR 4271 IH 

1 SEC. 2. DUAL GATEWAY POLICY REVIEW REQUIRED. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of State shall re3 view the dual gateway policy and determine the effects the 

4 discontinuation of the policy might have on the United 

5 States economy and the Western Ireland economy before 

6 the United States takes any diplomatic action that could 

7 lead to the discontinuation of the policy. 

8 (b) ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY.—In determining the 

9 effects that the discontinuation of the dual gateway policy 

10 might have on the United States economy, the Secretary 

11 of State, in consultation with the heads of other appro12 priate departments and agencies, shall consider the effects 

13 the discontinuation of the policy might have on United 

14 States businesses operating in Western Ireland and Irish 

15 businesses operating in and around Shannon Airport. 

16 (c) REPORT.—The Secretary of State shall submit a 

17 report describing the determinations made under sub18 section (a), together with any recommendations for United 

19 States action, to Congress not later than 180 days after 

20 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

21 (d) DUAL GATEWAY POLICY.—The term ‘‘dual gate22 way policy’’ means the policy of the Irish Government 

23 which requires certain air carriers serving Dublin Airport 

24 to undertake equal numbers of flights to Shannon Airport 

25 and Dublin Airport during each calendar year.

Æ
**                                                                    **EXHIBIT 32.1
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





I, Patrick Freeman, Chief Executive Officer of Cordia Corporation (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Form 10-QSB for the period March 31, 2005 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By: /s/ Patrick Freeman

________________________

Patrick Freeman

Chief Executive Officer



May 10, 2005



* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cordia Corporation and will be retained by Cordia Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.