alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund V, Ltd. at June 30, 2000,  and its  statement of income
for the six months then ended and is  qualified  in its entirety by reference to
the Form 10-Q of CNL Income Fund V, Ltd. for the six months ended June 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         1,784,889
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  206,573
<ALLOWANCES>                                   174,573
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         10,974,111
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,002,785
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 16,195,739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     15,158,695
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   16,195,739
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               715,746
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  290,722
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               18,673
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                495,947
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            495,947
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   495,947
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Due  to  the  natre  of  its  industry,  CNL  Income  Fund  V,  Ltd.  has an
unclassified  balance  sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>





</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                    EXHIBIT 5

                              WOLFF & SAMSON, P.A.
                              280 CORPORATE CENTER
                               5 BECKER FARM ROAD
                         ROSELAND, NEW JERSEY 07068-1776


                                                                    May 20, 1998


Daisytek International Corporation
500 North Central Expressway
Plano, Texas  75074

Gentlemen:

                  We have acted as counsel to Daisytek International
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the
preparation and filing by the Company of a Registration Statement on Form S-8
(the "Registration Statement") relating to the issuance of up to 2,276,351
shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Company (the "Shares")
pursuant to the terms of (i) the 1997 Stock Option Plan of Daisytek
International Corporation (the "1997 Plan"), (ii) the Non-Employee Director
Stock Option and Retainer Plan of Daisytek International Corporation (the
"Director Plan") and (iii) certain written Stock Option Agreements between the
Company and certain of its employees and directors (the "Individual Plans" and
together with the 1997 Plan and the Director Plan, the "Plans").

                  We have examined copies of the Certificate of Incorporation
and By-Laws of the Company, as amended and restated, the Registration Statement,
the Plans and such other corporate records and documents as we deemed necessary
to form the basis for the opinion hereinafter expressed. In our examination of
such material, we have assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the
authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals and the conformity to
original documents of all copies submitted to us. As to various questions of
fact material to such opinion, we have relied upon statements and certificates
of officers and representatives of the Company and others.

                  Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that all of
the Shares have been duly authorized and, when issued and sold in accordance
with the terms described in the Plans, will be validly issued, fully paid and
non-assessable.

<PAGE>   2

                  We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit
to the Registration Statement and to the reference to us in the Prospectus dated
January 26, 1995 (File No. 33-86926) included in the Registration Statement as a
document incorporated by reference. In giving such consent, we do not admit
hereby that we come within the category of persons whose consent is required
under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933 or the rules and regulations of
the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder.

                                             Very truly yours,


                                             /s/ WOLFF & SAMSON, P.A.
No. 14

- 1 4

- 00532

- CR

______________________________

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOURTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

______________________________
ADRIAN DAVID HEATH, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

______________________________

On Appeal From the 359th Judicial District Court

Of Montgomery County Texas

______________________________

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

______________________________

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW, the State of Texas and files this, the State’s Notice of

Appearance of Counsel, and respectfully shows the following:

Pursuant to Rule 6.1(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the

State designates Jonathan S. White as lead counsel on appeal in the above

cause. The undersigned respectfully requests that his appearance as counsel

be noted on the docket sheet, and that a copy of all future correspondence,

orders, and pleadings be forwarded to counsel at the e-mail address listed in

the si gnature block below. ACCEPTED
14-14-00532-CR
FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS
2/17/2015 12:25:12 PM
CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

### 2 Respectfully submitted,



### / s/ Jonathan S. White

JONATHAN S. WHITE Assistant Attorney General

Criminal Prosecutions Division

State Bar No. 240 54475

P. O. Box 12548, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711 (512) 475

- 2547 (direct) (512) 370

- 9723 (FAX)

jon athan

. white @texasattorneygeneral.gov

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I do hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing

pleading, in addition to being emailed, was served by placing the same in the

United States Mail, postage prepaid, on February 17, 2015 , addressed to

Attorney for Appellant :

Jay Wright Law Office of Jay M. Wright

322 North Main St. Conroe, TX 77301 (936) 494

- 2462 (936) 494

- 1976 (fax)
jaywrightatty@hotmail.com



### / s/ Jonathan S. White

JONATHAN S. WHITE Assistant Attorney General
<PAGE>   1
                         INTERNATIONAL HOME FOODS, INC.
                 (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
                                   (UNAUDITED)


EXHIBIT 12     COMPUTATION OF CONSOLIDATED RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  Three Months Ended
                                                             March 31, 1998   March 31, 1997
                                                             --------------   --------------
         <S>                                                 <C>              <C>           
         Income before provision for income taxes            $       31,912   $       12,292


         Add (subtract):

               Interest on term loans and notes                      21,732           24,747

               Amortization of debt cost                              1,190            1,160

               Portion of rents representative of interest              558              163
                                                             --------------   --------------

         Income as adjusted                                  $       55,392   $       38,362


         Fixed Charges

               Interest on term loans and notes              $       21,732   $       24,747

               Amortization of debt costs                             1,190            1,160

               Portion of rents representative of interest              558              163
                                                             --------------   --------------

               Total fixed charges                           $       23,480   $       26,070

         Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges               2.36             1.47
                                                             ==============   ==============
</TABLE>
Optimizing a 

Magnetically 

Shielded Solenoid 

for Extended-Q 

SANS Polarization 

Analysis Capability

Sidney Molnar, Hamilton College '22

SURF Gaithersburg NCNR 2021

Mentor: Wangchun Chen

1
Overview

Background

SANS and vSANS Measurements

3He Cell

Optimization

Turn Configurations

Sensitivity and Resistance

Results

Figures of Merit

2
Background

• SANS and vSANS

• The 3He Cell

• Our Solenoid

3
SANS and vSANS Measurement Capabilities

4
The 3He Cell

5
SANS and vSANS Measurement Capabilities

6

neutrons

Detector

Sample

3He analyzer

Electromagnet
Essential Features 

of the Solenoid

7

Small 

Compensation Coil

Large 

Compensation Coil

Main 

Coil
Optimizing Uniformity of the 

Magnetic Field in a 

Shielded Solenoid

• Initial Calculations

• Final Turns

• Sensitivity

• Fractional Turns

• Off-Axis Scans

8
Initial Parameters for 

Optimization

8 small compensation coil turns

15 large compensation coil turns

0.8 amps of current through each coil

9

Large End Cap Small End Cap
Initial Parameters for 

Optimization

8 small compensation coil turns

15 large compensation coil turns

0.8 amps of current through each coil

10
Finding the Final 

Configuration

• 14 small coil turns

• 22 large coil turns

11

Optimal 8cm Region

Figure of Merit:

Line Average = (dBz/dz)/|Bz|
Sensitivity Analysis

How does the position of 

the solenoid within the mu-metal 

shield affect our field?

12

Optimal 8cm Region

1.1x10-4 cm-1
Adjustments for 

Fractional Turn 

Configurations

• Parallel Resistance = 

(Coil Current * Coil Resistance)

Parallel Current

• Parallel Resistance: ~2.6 ohms

13

Optimal 8cm Region
Off-Axial Scans

Scanning the Field for Two Dimensions Calculating a Volume Average

14

Optimal 8cm 

Region

Optimal 

8cm Region

1.3x10-4 cm-1

Volume Avg Parameter:

(B_Grad/B)2

Horizontal Field Magnetic Gradient
Summary 

of Our 

Results

Extended Q-Range for smallscale nanomagnetic research

Optimal uniformity for longer 

relaxation time of 3He cell

Final Figures of Merit reduced 

significantly from our original 

calculations

15
Many thanks to: Acknowledgements Wangchun, 

Shannon, and 

Hannah 

(NIST NCNR)

Gordon and Brian 

(Hamilton College)

Joe, Susana, Julie, 

Brandi (SURF 

Directors)

CHRNS

for making this 

summer's 

research possible.

16
17
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      1,610
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                               2,060
<ALLOWANCES>                                   43
<INVENTORY>                                   219
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            4,013
<PP&E>                                    121,773
<DEPRECIATION>                             55,608
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             72,120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       6,530
<BONDS>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       75
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         794
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                 16,287
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               72,120
<SALES>                                     7,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            7,233
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               8,007
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          2,753
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,527)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,527)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,776)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.48)




</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6443
ISAAC EUGENE SLAPPY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. C. Weston Houck, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-109-3-2-BD) Submitted: January 7, 1997 Decided: Jan7uary 31, 1997 Before ERVIN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Isaac Eugene Slappy, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for a certificate of probable cause for appeal so that he may appeal the district court's dismissal of his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214.This court denied a certificate of probable cause for appeal and dismissed Slappy's habeas corpus petition in Slappy v. South Carolina , 92 F.3d 1181 (4th Cir. July 30, 1996) (No. 95-7725) (unpublished), cert. denied , ___ U.S. ___, 65 U.S.L.W. 3353 (U.S.Nov. 12, 1996) (No. 96-6191). Thus, this appeal is moot. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in this registration
statement on Form S-8 of our report dated February 8, 1997, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of Benchmark Communications Radio Limited
Partnership as of December 31, 1995 and 1996, and for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1996.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Dallas, Texas
August 31, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE REPORT
ON FORM 10-K OF COX TECHNOLOGIES,  INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED APRIL 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,250,810
<SECURITIES>                                    51,211
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,599,079
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,664
<INVENTORY>                                  1,542,663
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,540,100
<PP&E>                                       7,109,762
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,949,772
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,877,192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,269,211
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    20,306,098
<OTHER-SE>                                (10,280,160)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,877,192
<SALES>                                      8,954,544
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,954,544
<CGS>                                        4,817,252
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,791,252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             153,130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                258,515
<INCOME-TAX>                                    61,610
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            163,292
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                248,353
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   196,905
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
10209.

#### Jackson *v.*Campbell.

Decided April 19, 1919.

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court—Judge Pendleton. October 31, 1918.

*R. R. Jackson,*for plaintiff. *W. O. Wilson,*contra.

Luke, J.

1. When money is paid into court by a garnishee with an answer of indebtedness, he may be discharged if there be no traverse to his answer.

(a) A claim to such money may be filed by anyone who claims it, and the the question of title is disposed of under the rules which govern the trial of ordinary claim cases.

2. Upon the admissions of the plaintiff as shown by the answer of the trial judge whose judgment is complained of in the petition for certiorari, and the other facts appearing in the record, the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

*Judgment affirmed,*

*Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.*
10815.

#### Waller *v.*The State.

Decided November 4, 1919.

Conviction of stabbing; from city court of Macon—Judge Guerry. July 19, 1919.

The instructions complained of were as follows: “Where several witnesses who are equally credible testify on the question as to whether an alleged thing happened at a certain time and place or not, and one of them testifies positively that such thing did happen, and the other witnesses had the same opportunity of observation and testify that they did not see or know that it happened, the testimony of the one positive witness should have greater weight than the testimony of such negative witnesses. If the one positive *348witness" had the better opportunity of knowing what tianspired than the negative witness had, then for a greater reason the testimony of such positive witness should have greater weight. In determining the probative value of the positive and negative testimony, the credibility of the witnesses should be considered. If the testimony of any one or more of the witnesses on either side of the question is corroborated by any fact or by the testimony of any other witnesses in the case, that corroboration should also be considered in determining the probative effect of positive and negative testimony. If Eaty Reed [the prosecutrix] was cut on her breast on the occasion testified about, and the defendant then and there, immediately after the cutting, stated that he cut her, you should consider this statement also in determining the probative effect of the positive and negative testimony along with the defendant’s statement on the stand. If the testimony of a witness otherwise appears to be negative, his statement that the thing could not have happened without his seeing it would not change his negative testimony to positive testimony.” It was contended that the court erred in so charging for the reason that the charge excluded from the consideration of the jury the evidence tending to show that the witness Eaty Reed was not cut by the defendant on the occasion as to which she testified; and that the court erred particularly in charging that “if the testimony of a witness otherwise-appears to be negative, his statement that the thing could not have happened without his seeing it would not change his negative testimony to positive testimony;” that this was not a correct statement of the law, without explanation or qualification. ^

*347Bloodworth, J.

1. The court did not err in charging the jury as complained of in the amendment to the motion for new trial.

2. There is ample evidence to support the verdict, and the judgment is

*Affirmed.*

*Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., eonev,r.*

*348
      *H, F.*Rawls, for plaintiff in error. *Will*Gunn, solicitor, contra.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-02-1998
<CASH>                                             399
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,678
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,880
<PP&E>                                         173,082
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,783
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 171,763
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,888
<BONDS>                                         12,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           130
<OTHER-SE>                                     139,564
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   171,763
<SALES>                                         79,608
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,608
<CGS>                                           15,595
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   70,910
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (412)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,110
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,443
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,667
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,667
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43
        

</TABLE>