71746 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 232 / Wednesday, December 3, 2014 / Notices 

1See Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary 

Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review of Certain Preserved Mushrooms from the 

People’s Republic of China; 2013/2014 from 

Christian Marsh Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, dated November 25, 

2014 (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), issued 

concurrently with and hereby adopted by this 

notice. 

2See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). 

3On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic 

Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) to AD and CVD 

Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). 

The Web site location was changed from http://

iaacess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The 

Ningbo Yinzhou Foreign Trade Co., Ltd. 

Ningbo Zhongjiang High Strength Bolts Co. 

Ltd 

Ningbo Zhongjiang Petroleum Pipes & 

Machinery Co. Ltd. 

Orient International Holding Shanghai 

Rongheng Intl Trading Co. Ltd. 

Prosper Business And Industry Co., Ltd. 

Qingdao Free Trade Zone Health Intl. 

Qingdao Top Steel Industrial Co. Ltd. 

Shaanxi Succeed Trading Co., Ltd. 

Shanghai East Best Foreign Trade Co. 

Shanghai East Best International Business 

Development Co., Ltd. 

Shanghai Fortune International Co. Ltd. 

Shanghai Furen International Trading 

Shanghai Nanshi Foreign Economic Co. 

Shanghai Overseas International Trading Co. 

Ltd. 

Shanghai Printing & Dyeing And Knitting 

Mill 

Shanghai Printing & Packaging Machinery 

Corp. 

Shanghai Recky International Trading Co., 

Ltd. 

Shanghai Sinotex United Corp. Ltd. 

T and C Fastener Co. Ltd. 

T and L Industry Co. Ltd. 

Wuxi Metec Metal Co. Ltd. 

Zhejiang Heiter Industries Co., Ltd. 

Zhejiang Heiter Mfg & Trade Co. Ltd. 

Zhejiang Jin Zeen Fasteners Co. Ltd. 

Zhejiang Morgan Brother Technology Co. 

Ltd. 

Zhejiang Yanfei Industrial Co., Ltd (a/k/a 

Jiangsu Ronry Nico Co., Ltd., Formerly 

Jiangsu Yanfei Industrial Co., Ltd.) 

[FR Doc. 2014–28461 Filed 12–2–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–851] 

Certain Preserved Mushrooms From 

the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2013/2014 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 3, 2014. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

preserved mushrooms from the People’s 

Republic of China (PRC) covering the 

period February 1, 2013, through 

January 31, 2014. We preliminarily 

determine that sales made by Linyi City 

Kangfa Foodstuff Drinkable Co., Ltd. 

(Kangfa), and Zhangzhou Gangchang 

Canned Foods Co., Ltd. (Gangchang) 

were made below normal value (NV). 

We invite interested parties to comment 

on these preliminary results. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael J. Heaney, or Robert James AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4475 or (202) 482– 

0649, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by this order 

are certain preserved mushrooms, 

whether imported whole, sliced, diced, 

or as stems and pieces. The certain 

preserved mushrooms covered under 

this order are the species Agaricus 

bisporus and Agaricus bitorquis. 

‘‘Certain Preserved Mushrooms’’ refers 

to mushrooms that have been prepared 

or preserved by cleaning, blanching, and 

sometimes slicing or cutting. These 

mushrooms are then packed and heated 

in containers including, but not limited 

to, cans or glass jars in a suitable liquid 

medium, including, but not limited to, 

water, brine, butter or butter sauce. 

Certain preserved mushrooms may be 

imported whole, sliced, diced, or as 

stems and pieces. Included within the 

scope of this order are ‘‘brined’’ 

mushrooms, which are presalted and 

packed in a heavy salt solution to 

provisionally preserve them for further 

processing. The merchandise subject to 

this order is classifiable under 

subheadings: 2003.10.0127, 

2003.10.0131, 2003.10.0137, 

2003.10.0143, 2003.10.0147, 

2003.10.0153, and 0711.51.0000 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). Although the 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and Customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of this 

order is dispositive.1

No Shipments Certification 

On June 2, 2014, (1) Dezhou Kaihang 

Agricultural Science Technology Co., 

Ltd., (Dezhou Kaihang), (2) Fujian 

Haishan Foods Co., Ltd. (Fujian 

Haishan), (3) Fujian Pinghe Baofeng 

Canned Foods (Fujian Pinghe), (4) 

Fujian Zishan Group Co., Ltd. (Fujian 

Zishan), 5) Inter-Foods (Dongshan) Co., 

Ltd. (Inter-Foods), (6) Xiamen Longhuai 

Import & Export Co., Ltd. (Xiamen 

Longhuai), (7) Xiamen International 

Trade & Industrial Co., Ltd. (XITIC), and 

(8) Zhangzhou Hongda Import & Export 

Trading Co., Ltd. (Zhangzhou Hongda) 

submitted no shipment certifications. 

Both XITIC and Zhangzhou Hongda 

currently have separate rate status. 

Accordingly, on October 17, 2014, the 

Department sent an inquiry to U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

determine whether CBP entry data is 

consistent with the no shipments 

certifications from XITIC and 

Zhangzhou Hongda. The Department 

received no information contrary to 

either XITIC’s or Zhangzhou Hongda’s 

claims of no shipments. Based on the 

no-shipment certifications and our 

analysis of the CBP information, we 

preliminary determine that both XITIC 

and Zhangzhou Hongda did not have 

any reviewable transactions during the 

POR. In addition, for both XITIC and 

Zhangzhou Hongda, the Department 

finds that consistent with its recently 

announced refinement to its assessment 

practice in non-market economy (NME) 

cases, it is appropriate not to rescind the 

review in part in this circumstance but, 

rather, to complete the review with 

respect to both XITIC and Zhangzhou 

Hongda and issue appropriate 

instructions to CBP based on the final 

results of the review.2 However, since 

Dezhou Kaihang, Fujian Haishan, Fujian 

Pinghe, Fujian Zishan, Inter-Foods, and 

Xiamen Longhuai were part of the PRCwide entity at the outset of this 

administrative review, and continue to 

be part of the PRC-wide entity in this 

administrative review, we are not 

making a determination of no shipments 

with respect to Dezhou Kaihang, Fujian 

Haishan, Fujian Pinghe, Fujian Zishan, 

Inter-Foods, and Xiamen Longhuai for 

the preliminary results of the instant 

administrative review. 

Methodology 

The Department conducted this 

review in accordance with section 

751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). For a full 

description of the methodology 

underlying our conclusions, please see 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

The Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

is a public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS).3


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 232 / Wednesday, December 3, 2014 / Notices 71747 

Final Rule changing the references to the 

Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 

(November 20, 2014). 

4See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 

Request for Revocation in Part, 79 FR 18262 (April 

1, 2014) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). 

5See Memorandum to Richard Weible, Director, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, from Mike Heaney 

and Tyler Weinhold, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

VI, Subject: ‘‘Administrative Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Preserved 

Mushrooms from the People’s Republic of China: 

Respondent Selection Memorandum,’’ dated May 

23, 2014. 

6These 48 exporters are: (1)Ayecue (Liaocheng) 

Foodstuff Co., Ltd., (2) Blue Field (Sichuan) Food 

Industrial Co., Ltd., (3) China National Cereals, Oils 

& Foodstuffs Import & Export Corp., (4) China 

Processed Food Import & Export Co., (5) Dalian J&N 

Foods Co., Ltd., (6) Dezhou Kaihang Agricultural 

Science Technology Co., Ltd., (7) Dujiangyan 

Xingda Foodstuff Co., Ltd., (8) Fujian Dongshan 

Changlong Trade Co., Ltd., (9) Fujian Golden 

Banyan Foodstuffs Industrial Co., Ltd., (10) Fujian 

Haishan Foods Co., Ltd., (11) Fujian Pinghe Baofeng 

Canned Foods, (12) Fujian Tongfa Foods Group Co., 

Ltd., (13) Fuzhou Sunshine Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd., 

(14) Fujian Yuxing Fruits and Vegetables Foodstuffs 

Development Co., Ltd., (15) Fujian Zishan Group 

Co., Ltd., (16) Golden Banyan Foodstuffs Co., Ltd., 

(17) Guangxi Eastwing Trading Co., Ltd., (18) 

Guangxi Hengyong Industrial & Commercial Dev. 

Ltd., (19) Guangxi Jisheng Foods, Inc., (20) InterFoods (Dongshan) Co., Ltd., (21) Longhai Guangfa 

Food Co., Ltd., (22) Longhai Jiasheng Food Co., Ltd., 

(23) Primera Harvest (Xiangfan) Co., Ltd., (24) 

Qingdao Canned Foods Co., Ltd., (25) Shandong 

Fengyu Edible Fungus Corporation Ltd., (26) 

Shandong Jiufa Edible Fungus Corporation, Ltd., 

(27) Shandong Yinfeng Rare Fungus Corporation, 

Ltd., (28) Synehon (Xiamen) Trading Co., Ltd., (29) 

Sun Wave Trading Co., Ltd., (30) Xiamen Carre 

Food Co., Ltd., (31) Xiamen Choice Harvest Imp., 

(32) Xiamen Greenland Import & Export Co., Ltd., 

(33) Xiamen Gulong Import & Export Co., Ltd., (34) 

Xiamen Gulong Import Export Co. Ltd., (35) Xiamen 

Jiahua Import & Export Trading Co., Ltd., (36) 

Xiamen Longhuai Import & Export Co., Ltd., (37) 

Xiamen Sungiven Import & Export Co., Ltd., (38) 

Xiamen Yubang Import Export Trading Co. Ltd., 

(39) Zhangzhou Golden Banyan Foodstuffs 

Industrial Co., Ltd., (40) Zhangzhou Lixing Imp. & 

Exp. Trade Co., Ltd., (41) Zhangzhou Long 

Mountain Foods Co., Ltd., (42) Zhangzhou Tan Co., 

Ltd., (43) Zhangzhou Tianbaolong Food Co., Ltd., 

(44) Zhangzhou Tongfa Foods Industry Co., Ltd., 

(45) Zhangzhou Yuxing Imp. & Exp. Trading Co., 

Ltd., (46) Zhangzhou Xiangcheng Rainbow & 

Greenland Food Co., Ltd., (47) Zhejiang Iceman 

Food Co., Ltd., and (48) Zhejiang Iceman Group Co., 

Ltd. 

7See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

8See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii). 

9See 19 CFR 351.309 (d). 

10See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

11See 19 CFR 351.303(b). 

12See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

13See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 

14See 19 CFR 351.212(b). 

15 In these preliminary results, the Department 

applied the assessment rate calculation method 

adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation 

of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov and available 

to all parties in the Central Records 

Unit, Room 7046 of the main 

Department of Commerce building. In 

addition, a complete version of the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum can 

be accessed directly on the Internet at 

http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The 

signed Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum and electronic versions of 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

are identical in content. 

Background 

On April 1, 2014, the Department 

published in the Federal Register, a 

notice of initiation of the antidumping 

duty administrative review of 

mushrooms from the PRC for the period 

February 1, 2013, through January 31, 

2014, with respect to the 52 companies 

named in the review requests submitted 

by interested parties.4 The Department 

has selected Kangfa and Gangchang as 

mandatory respondents,5 and the 

separate rates calculated for both of 

these exporters are listed infra. 

Additionally, the Department has 

preliminarily determined that both 

XITIC and Zhangzhou Hongda did not 

have any reviewable transactions during 

the POR. As a result of our preliminary 

determination of no shipments for 

XITIC and Zhangzhou Hongda, these 

companies retain their most recently 

determined separate rate, as do the two 

selected mandatory respondents, Kangfa 

and Gangchang. The Department 

preliminarily determines that the 

remaining 48 exporters did not 

demonstrate their eligibility for separate 

rate status in this review.6 As a result, 

the Department is preliminarily treating 

these 48 PRC exporters as part of the 

PRC-wide entity. 

Preliminary Results of the Review 

The Department preliminarily 

determines that the following dumping 

margin exists for the period February 1, 

2013, through January 31, 2014: 

Manufacturer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

margin 

(percent) 

Linyi City Kangfa Foodstuff 

Drinkable Co., Ltd. ................

Zhangzhou Gangchang 

Canned Foods Co., Ltd. ....... 78.69 

102.87 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

The Department intends to disclose to 

parties to this proceeding the 

calculations performed in reaching the 

preliminary results within five days of 

the date of publication of these 

preliminary results.7 Interested parties 

may submit case briefs no later than 30 

days after the date of publication of the 

preliminary results.8 Rebuttals to case 

briefs may be filed no later than five 

days after the deadline for filing case 

briefs and all rebuttal comments must 

be limited to comments raised in the 

case briefs.9 Parties who submit case 

briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding are encouraged to submit 

with each argument: (1) A statement of 

the issue; (2) a brief summary of the 

argument; and (3) a table of 

authorities.10 Case and rebuttal briefs 

must be filed electronically via 

ACCESS.11

Any interested party may request a 

hearing within 30 days of publication of 

this notice.12 Hearing requests should 

contain the following information: (1) 

The party’s name, address and 

telephone number; (2) the number of 

participants; and (3) a list of the issues 

to be discussed. Oral presentations will 

be limited to issues raised in the case 

briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, 

parties will be notified of the date and 

time for the hearing to be held at the 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230.13

The Department intends to issue the 

final results of this administrative 

review, including the results of its 

analysis of the issues raised in any 

briefs, within 120 days after the 

publication of these preliminary results, 

pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuing the final results of the 

review, the Department shall determine, 

and. CBP shall assess, antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries covered 

by this review.14 The Department 

intends to issue assessment instructions 

to CBP 15 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of 

review. For any individually examined 

respondents whose weighted-average 

dumping margin is above de minimis, 

we will calculate, where appropriate, 

either an ad valorem or per-unit 

assessment rate for each importer (or 

customer).15 The per-unit assessment 

rate will be based on the ratio of the 

total amount of dumping calculated for 

the importer’s examined sales to the 

total entered quantity of those same 

sales. The ad valorem assessment rate 

will be based on the ratio of the total 

amount of dumping calculated for the 

importer’s examined sales to the total 

entered value of those same sales. 

We will instruct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review when the 

importer-specific assessment rate 

calculated in the final results of this 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
71748 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 232 / Wednesday, December 3, 2014 / Notices 

16For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 

(October 24, 2011). 17See id. 

1See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Intent 

To Rescind Antidumping Duty New Shipper 

Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 40710 (July 14, 2014) 

(‘‘Preliminary Rescission’’). 

2See Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Associate 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, through James C. 

Doyle, Director, Office V, Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, from Susan S. 

Pulongbarit, Sr. International Trade Analyst, Office 

V, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations, regarding Certain Frozen Fish Fillets 

from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Extension 

of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

New Shipper Review of Thanh Hung Co., Ltd., 

dated September 18, 2014. 

3See Letter from Thanh Hung to the Department 

regarding Refile & Redacted Direct Case Brief: New 

Shipper Review of Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from 

the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Review Period— 

8/1/12–7/31/13, dated October 2, 2014 (‘‘Thanh 

Hung Case Brief’’). We note that this is a refiled and 

redacted case brief. See Memo to File, from Susan 

Pulongbarit, Sr. International Trade Analyst, 

regarding New Shipper Review of Certain Frozen 

Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

New Factual Information, dated October 3, 2014. 

4See Letter from Petitioners to the Department 

regarding Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the 

review is above de minimis. Where 

either the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de 

minimis, or an importer-specific 

assessment rate is zero or de minimis, 

we will instruct CBP to liquidate the 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties. 

On October 24, 2011, the Department 

announced a refinement to its 

assessment practice in NME cases.16

Pursuant to this refinement in practice, 

for entries that were not reported in the 

U.S. sales databases submitted by 

companies individually examined 

during this review, the Department will 

instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at 

the NME-wide rate. In addition, if the 

Department determines that an exporter 

under review had no shipments of the 

subject merchandise, any suspended 

entries that entered under that 

exporter’s case number (i.e., at that 

exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the 

PRC-wide rate.17

The final results of this review shall 

be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of this review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, will apply 

to all shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The 

cash deposit rates for Kangfa and 

Gangchang, which both have a separate 

rate, will be the cash deposit rate 

established in the final results of this 

review (except, if the rate is zero or de 

minimis, then zero cash deposit will be 

required); (2) for any previously 

reviewed or investigated PRC and nonPRC exporter not listed above that 

received a separate rate in a previous 

segment of this proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all 

PRC exporters that have not been found 

to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will be that for the PRCwide entity (i.e., 303.80 percent); and (4) 

for all non-PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate applicable to the PRC 

exporter that supplied the non-PRC 

exporter. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. We are 

issuing and publishing these 

preliminary results in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). 

Dated: November 25, 2014. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

1. Summary 

2. Background 

3. Respondent Selection 

4. Information and Comment Submitted in 

this Review 

5. Scope of the Order 

6. Non-Market Economy Country Status 

7. Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

8. Separate Rates Determination 

9. Absence of De Jure Control 

10. Absence of De Facto Control 

11. The PRC-wide Entity 

12. Surrogate Country 

13. Fair Value Comparisons 

14. U.S. Price 

15. Normal Value 

16. Factors Valuation 

17. Currency Conversion 

18. Conclusion 

[FR Doc. 2014–28462 Filed 12–2–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–552–801] 

Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published its 

Preliminary Rescission for the new 

shipper review (‘‘NSR’’) of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

frozen fish fillets from the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam (‘‘Vietnam’’) on 

July 14, 2014.1 The period of review 

(‘‘POR’’) is August 1, 2012, through July 

31, 2013. As discussed below, we 

preliminarily found that Thanh Hung 

Co., Ltd. D/B/A Thanh Hung Frozen 

Seafood Processing Import Export Co., 

Ltd.’s (‘‘Thanh Hung’’) sale was nonbona fide, and announced our 

preliminary intent to rescind Thanh 

Hung’s NSR. For the final results of this 

review, we continue to find Thanh 

Hung’s sale to be non-bona fide. 

Therefore, because there were no other 

shipments or entries by Thanh Hung 

during the POR, we are rescinding this 

NSR. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 3, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan Pulongbarit, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–4031. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

As noted above, on July 14, 2014, the 

Department published the Preliminary 

Rescission of this NSR. Thereafter, the 

Department extended the time period 

for issuing the final results to December 

1, 2014.2 On October 2, 2014, the 

Department received a case brief from 

Thanh Hung.3 On October 6, 2014, the 

Department received a rebuttal brief 

from the Catfish Farmers of America 

and individual U.S. catfish processors 

(‘‘Petitioners’’).4 On November 13, 2014, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES