alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff 

KEVIN O. CRUMP 

v. Record No. 0537-95-1 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

 PER CURIAM 

COLONIAL MASONRY, INC. NOVEMBER 21, 1995 

AND 

NATIONAL GRANGE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY 

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 Gregory E. Camden (Rutter & Montagna, on 

briefs), for appellant. 

 William C. Walker; Donna White Kearney 

(Taylor & Walker, on brief), for appellees. 

 Kevin O. Crump appeals a decision of the Workers' 

Compensation Commission denying his application seeking 

compensation for an occupational disease on the basis that he 

failed to prove that his bilateral pneumonitis was a disease 

within the meaning of "disease" under the Workers' Compensation 

Act ("the Act"). We reverse the commission's decision based upon 

our holding in Perdue Farms, Inc. v. McCutchan, 21 Va. App. 65, 

461 S.E.2d 431 (1995). 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 

 In Piedmont Mfg. Co. v. East, 17 Va. App. 499, 503, 438 

S.E.2d 769, 772 (1993), we defined "disease" as: 

 any deviation from or interruption of the 

normal structure or function of any part, 

organ, or system (or combination thereof) of 

the body that is manifested by a 

characteristic set of symptoms and signs and 

whose etiology, pathology, and prognosis may 
- 2 - 

 2 

be known or unknown. 

 "[T]he definition enunciated in Piedmont [has been 

recognized by this Court] as the general and accepted meaning of 

the term 'disease,' a term which is presumed to be known by the 

legislature and is employed by it without restriction in Code 

§§ 65.2-400 and 65.2-401." Perdue Farms, Inc. v. McCutchan, 21 

Va. App. 65, 68, 461 S.E.2d 431, 435 (1995). 

 Pneumonitis is defined as "inflammation of the lungs." 

Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary 1039 (26th ed. 1985). 

Using this general medical definition of pneumonitis, as we did 

for carpal tunnel syndrome in Perdue, we find that it places 

pneumonitis within the definition of disease set forth in 

Piedmont and approved of in Perdue. 

 On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable 

to the prevailing party below. R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp. v. 

Mullins, 10 Va. App. 211, 212, 390 S.E.2d 788, 788 (1990). We 

uphold the commission's factual findings if supported by credible 

evidence. James v. Capitol Steel Constr. Co., 8 Va. App. 512, 

515, 382 S.E.2d 487, 488 (1989). 

 As in Perdue, Crump's condition did not present as an 

obvious, sudden, mechanical or structural change in his body. 

Rather, credible evidence supported a finding that this condition 

constituted a disease as defined in Piedmont. We conclude that 

the commission erred in finding that Crump's pneumonitis is not a 

condition characterized as a "disease" within the meaning of the 
- 3 - 

 3 

Act. 

 Accordingly, we reverse the commission's decision and remand 

this case for the commission to consider whether Crump's 

condition arose out of and in the course of his employment as 

required by the Act. 

 Reversed and remanded.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4198 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4198

    To suspend temporarily the duty on Bis (2,2,6,6,-tetramethyl-4-
                         piperidyl) sebaceate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 22, 2004

  Mr. Bonner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on Bis (2,2,6,6,-tetramethyl-4-
                         piperidyl) sebaceate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON BIS (2,2,6,6,-TETRAMETHYL-4-PIPERIDYL) 
              SEBACEATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following:

``      9902.34.21       Bis (2,2,6,6,-     Free         No Change        No Change        On or Before 12/  ''.
                         tetramethyl-4-                                                     31/2007
                         piperidyl)
                         sebaceate (CAS
                         No. 52829-07-9)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2933.39.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1.
                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

     I, Patrick Freeman, Chief Executive Officer of Cordia Corporation (the
"Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the period September 30, 2003 of the Registrant, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

                              By: /s/ Patrick Freeman
                                 -------------------------------
                                 Patrick Freeman
                                 Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2003

*     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Cordia Corporation and will be retained by Cordia Corporation
and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00144-CR

THOMAS EDWARD DEMOPOULOS,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 355th District Court

of Hood County (CR15115)

August 8, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Bassel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in the trial court’s judgment. The judgment is modified to delete the $340 

award of court costs and to strike the incorporated order to withdraw $10,340 in 

funds. We further modify the bill of costs to delete the $10,000 “Criminal Fine Fee” 

and to reflect a balance due of $0. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court is 

affirmed as modified.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

 Justice Dabney Bassel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<LEGEND>
"This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Resort
Income Investors, Inc.'s Form 10-QSB for the nine months ended
September 30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
Form 10-QSB."
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                 SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      2,356,841 
<SECURITIES>                                     0    
<RECEIVABLES>                                 661,130 
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0    
<INVENTORY>                                      0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            3,017,971 
<PP&E>                                           0    
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              3,017,971 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         331,865 
<BONDS>                                          0    
<COMMON>                                    2,686,106 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0    
<PREFERRED>                                      0    
<OTHER-SE>                                       0    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                3,017,971 
<SALES>                                          0    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              322,581 
<CGS>                                            0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0    
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              454,715 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (132,134)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (132,134)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0    
<CHANGES>                                        0    
<NET-INCOME>                                 (132,134)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)

<FN>

NOTE:   The above captions are specified in Exhibit 27, and contemplate
that the entity is a going concern.  As discussed in Note 1 to the
Company's unaudited financial statements, the Company is in the process of
liquidation as of September 30, 1998.  The amounts above are presented with
the caption that, in management's judgment, most closely correlates to
respective financial statement captions used in the Company's financial
statements.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Standard Companies Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, G. Peter DAloia, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ G. Peter DAloia                             
|G. Peter DAloia                                 
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                 
|October 30, 2007
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4238

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a $1,000 refundable 

credit for individuals who are active members of volunteer firefighting 

and emergency medical service organizations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2004

Mr. HINCHEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a 

$1,000 refundable credit for individuals who are active 

members of volunteer firefighting and emergency medical 

service organizations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REFUNDABLE CREDIT FOR ACTIVE MEMBERS 

4 OF VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTING AND EMER5 GENCY MEDICAL SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subpart C of part IV of sub7 chapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 

8 1986 (relating to refundable credits) is amended by redes-
2

•HR 4238 IH 

1 ignating section 36 as section 37 and by inserting after 

2 section 35 the following new section: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 36. ACTIVE MEMBERS OF VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTING 

4 AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE ORGA5 NIZATIONS. 

6 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an individual who 

7 at any time during the taxable year is an active member 

8 of a qualified volunteer fire department (as defined in sec9 tion 150(e)), there shall be allowed as a credit against the 

10 tax imposed by this subtitle the amount of $1,000. 

11 ‘‘(b) PART-YEAR ACTIVE MEMBERS.—In the case of 

12 an individual who is such an active member for only a 

13 portion of a taxable year, the amount of the credit under 

14 subsection (a) for such taxable year shall be an amount 

15 which bears the same ratio to $1,000 as such portion 

16 bears to the entire taxable year.’’

17 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

18 (1) Paragraph (2) of section 1324(b) of title 

19 31, United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘or 

20 36’’ after ‘‘section 35’’. 

21 (2) The table of sections for subpart C of part 

22 IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of such Code is 

23 amended by striking the last item and inserting the 

24 following new items:

‘‘Sec. 36. Active members of volunteer firefighting and emergency 

medical service organizations. 

‘‘Sec. 37. Overpayments of tax.’’.
3

•HR 4238 IH 

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3932 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3932

 To amend Public Law 99-338 to authorize the continued use of certain 
   lands within the Sequoia National Park by portions of an existing 
                         hydroelectric project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2004

  Mr. Nunes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend Public Law 99-338 to authorize the continued use of certain 
   lands within the Sequoia National Park by portions of an existing 
                         hydroelectric project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION TO REISSUE PERMIT.

    The first section of Public Law 99-338 is amended by striking ``one 
renewal'' and inserting ``3 renewals''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 9

Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 32-12 Filed: 12/10/20 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:355
Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 32-12 Filed: 12/10/20 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:356
Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 32-12 Filed: 12/10/20 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:357
Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 32-12 Filed: 12/10/20 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:358
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T P I NG C HE N, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 12- 70355 A ge nc yN o. A 088- 130- 025 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r24, 2013 ** B efo re: R A W L IN S O N , N . R . S M IT H , an dC H R IS T E N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P i ng C hen, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f C hi na, pet i t i on s f

or re vi ew of the B oard of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rdi s m i s s i ng hi s appe a l f r om a n i m m i gr a t i on ju d g e ’s d e c is io n d e n y in g h is ap p lic a tio n f o ra s y lu m a n dw ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i alevi dence 

# FI LED SEP 30 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 70355 2 th e a g e n c y ’s f

a c tu a l f in d in g s , ap p ly in g th e s tan d ar d s g o v e rn in g a d v e r s e c r e d ib ility d e te rm in a tio n s c r e a te db yth e R E A L I D A c t. Sh restha v. H older , 590 F . 3d 1034, 1 0 3 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) . W e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . S ubs t ant i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the B I A ’ s a dve r s e c r e di bi l i tyde t e rm i na t i on ba s e d on the i nc ons i s t e nc i e s i n C he n’ s t e s t i m onya nd appl i c a t i on aboutthe pr e s e nc e of

the hous e c hur c h pa s t oron the daype t i t i one rw a s a l l e ge dl ya rr e s t e d, and b as ed on the fa ctthatbo th h i s a sy l um appl i cat i on and h i s f ather’ s l ett er o m itte dth e f

a c t th a t h is p ar e n ts w e r e a lle g e d lyf o r c e dto p ayas ig n if

ic an t f in e . See id . a t1047 ( a ge nc y ’ s a dve r s e c r e di bi l i tyde t e rm i na t i on w a s r e a s onabl e unde rthe “to ta lityo f

th e c ir c u m s tan c e s ” ) ; se e al so Zam an ov v. H

older , 649 F . 3d 969, 974 ( 9th C i r . 2011) ( B I A notc om pe l l e d t o a c c e ptpe t i t i one r ’ s e xpl ana t i ons f or i nc ons i s t e nc i e s ) . I n the abs e nc e of c r e di bl e t e s t i m ony , C he n’ s a s y l um a nd w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l c la im s f

a il. Se e Fa ra h v . A s h c r o ft , 348 F . 3d 1153, 1156 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 27, 2009

d0518 

# Order

May 27, 2009

138017

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138017 COA: 278689 Montcalm CC: 06-008535-FC RICHARD ALLEN MATTHEWS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 18, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

860 KA 08-01361 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

JERMAINE JENNINGS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (PHILIP ROTHSCHILD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. MAXWELL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John J. Brunetti, A.J.), rendered March 31, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree. It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Entered: September 30, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
**EXHIBIT 12.6**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002**

 

I, Rick Medlock, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 20-F of Inmarsat Investments Limited (the “Company”); 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.    The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: 

 

(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

 

(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.    The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)    All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)    Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
EXHIBIT 32(a)**CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) ofLindsay Manufacturing Co. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended May 31, 2006, I, RichardW. Parod, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, David B. Downing, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.       /s/ Richard W. Parod President and Chief Executive Officer    Richard W. Parod         /s / David B. Downing Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    David B. Downing         July 10, 2006       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
- 30 -
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 23

- 00085

- CR

Isaac GARZA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CR12210

Honorable Melisa C. Skinner , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE WATKINS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED

and this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED May 17, 2023

.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice