alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Bonner, administrator, *v.*Traylor.

No. 6840.

January 15, 1929.

Gilbert, J.

1. Under the rulings in *Spooner*v. *Bank of Donalsonville,*159 *Ga.*295 (125 S. E. 456), the court did not err in entertaining equitable jurisdiction and in appointing receivers.

2. The assignments of error on admissibility of evidence do not show error. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*637
      *R. D. Jackson,*for plaintiff in error. *Boykin & Boykin,*contra.
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 00-2454 FIRST STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, Appellee,

v. BANCO DE SEGUROS DEL ESTADO, Respondent, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on June 27, 2001, is amended as follows: Page 2, line 24, should read: "On November 6, 1987 . . ." Page 6, line 1, should read: "received any notice of arbitration from First State Ins. Co., . . ." Page 8, line 13, should read: "notification in 1987 . . .".
10744.

#### Clayton *v.*The State.

Decided November 4, 1919.

Indictment for burglary; from Bibb superior court—Judge Mathews. July 2, 1919.

*Hubert F. Bawls,*for plaintiff in error.

*John P. Boss, solicitor-general,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

1. There is no material error in either of the excerpts from the charge complained of, when considered in the light of the facts of the case.

2. The evidence amply authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luhe a/nd Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4121 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4121

To amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act to help ensure a healthy food 
                    supply, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 2004

Mr. Rehberg (for himself and Mr. Peterson of Minnesota) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act to help ensure a healthy food 
                    supply, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Consumer and Producer Protection Act 
of 2004''.

SEC. 2. PREVENTION OF SLAUGHTER FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION OF CERTAIN 
              CATTLE.

    (a) Non-Ambulatory Defined.--Section 1 of the Federal Meat 
Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 601) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subsection:
    ``(w) The term `non-ambulatory' shall apply to any cattle that, at 
the time of examination and inspection under section 3(a), is unable to 
rise from a recumbent position or unable to walk for any reason, 
including metabolic conditions or central nervous system disorders, 
unless the reason for such inability is fatigue, stress, obdurator 
nerve paralysis, obesity, or one or more broken or fractured 
appendages, severed tendons or ligaments, or dislocated joints.''.
    (b) Prohibition on Allowing Certain Cattle to Pass Inspection.--
Section 3(a) of the Federal Meat Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 603(a)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``All cattle 
found on such inspection to be non-ambulatory, to test positive for 
central nervous system disorders, to exhibit signs of bovine spongiform 
encephalopathy (including moribund condition, tetanus, or emaciation), 
or to be dead prior to examination and inspection shall be found to be 
adulterated for purposes of section 4.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### S. S. Hite *v.*Henry Reeve.

Judicial Sales — When Purchaser Takes Subject to Lien.

Where land which was held in trust for a widow and her children was sold without making provision for the children, her lien on the land still subsiste, and the purchaser takes subject thereto.

APPEAL, PROM 'LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT.

March 29, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

Although Mrs. Sutherland (now Mrs. Renter) and her children, Elizabeth and Margaret, took the estate conveyed in trust for them to Henry Knipp, subject to existing liens, their right to so much of it as might be left after these liens should be discharged was perfect and absolute.

It does not appear why the entire property was sold at the suit of the lien holders, but if the sale was regular and proper, then they *592were entitled to the surplus purchase money, between $1,500 and $1,800. The children certainly could not be divested of their interest in this surplus by the consent order entered up (on motion of Rummers, the purchaser, Mrs. Renter, and Knipp, the trustee), by which Mrs. Renter was substituted as purchaser. The result of that consent order has been a resale of the property, in which no provision was made for these children, notwithstanding this sale.

*J. B. Cochrcwi, for appellant.*

*P. A. Guestner, for appellee.*

Their lien still subsists and Hill holds subject thereto. It results, therefore, that he can not make to* Reeve a good title. The chancellor properly refused to* compel the latter to accept an imperfect one.

*Hightower v. Smith,*5 J. J. Marshall 542; *Barnett v. Higgins, 4*Dana 565.

Judgment *affirmed.*
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a 14(a)/15d-14(a) and

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Preston J. Shea, President and Chief Financial Officer of Dimensional Visions Incorporated, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Dimensional Visions Incorporated;

2. Based upon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based upon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting

Date:  May 23, 2005



/s/ Preston J. Shea

Preston J. Shea

President and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 13.5**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Inmarsat Investments Limited (the“Company”) for the annual period ended 31 December 2006 (the “Periodic Report”), I, Andrew Sukawaty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in thePeriodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Date: 27 April 2007
10996

#### Kimbrel *v.*The State.

Decided January 27, 1920.

Accusation of drawing check, without funds to meet it; from city court of Miller county—Judge Geer. October 1,1919.

*P. B. Rich,*for plaintiff in error. *N. L. Stapleton, solicitor,*contra.

Bloodworth, J.

1. “In order for the exclusion of oral testimony to be considered as a ground for a new trial, it must appear that a pertinent question was asked, and that the court ruled out the answer; and that a statement was made to the court at the time, showing what the answer would be; and that such testimony was material, and would have benefited the complaining party.” *Griffin*v. *Henderson,*117 *Ga.*382 (2) (43 S. E. 712). “The amendment to the motion for a new trial complains solely of 'the exclusion of certain evidence, but it is not shown therein that this evidence was offered by the plaintiff in error.” *Lowe*v. *Burden,*22 *Ga. App.*679 (1) (97 S. E. 106). Under the above rulings the amendment to the motion for a new trial raises no question for adjudication by this court.

2. The evidence amply supports the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge; no error of law appears; and the judgment is

*Affirmed.*

*Broyles, G. J., and Lulce, J., concur.*
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11** 
**- 6666** 

WILLIAM E. ALTON ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES; WEXFORD & ASSOCIATES CONTRACTORS; ISAIS TESSAMA, MD; MICKELS, MD; BARBARA NEWLON; BEVER LY SPARKS, P.A.; VICTOR JACKSON; J. P. MORGAN, Warden; MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; KATHLEEN GREEN, ECI Warden; DAVID MATHIS, MD ; NURSING STAFF; MCDONALD, P.A. ,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United State s District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. William M. Nickerson , Senior District Judge. ( 1:10

- cv
- 02365

- WMN )

Submitted : August 18, 2011 Decided: August 23, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

William E. Alton, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melton Andrews, Katrina J. Dennis, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland; Erin O’Brien Millar, Valerie L. Tetro, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Stepha nie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
William E. Alton, III, appeals the district court ’ s
order denying relief o n his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Alton v. Corr. Med. Servs. , No. 1:10

- cv
- 02365

- WMN (D.
Md. Apr. 18, 2011) . We dispens e with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.3


                               [Chase Letterhead]


Chase Bank USA, N.A.
201 N. Walnut Street
Wilmington, DE 19813

                                               March 29, 2005

                   Management Report on Internal Control over
                Servicing of Securitized Credit Card Receivables

Management of Chase Bank USA, NA (the "Bank"), as servicer of the Chase Credit
Card Master Trust, (the "Trust"), is responsible for establishing and
maintaining effective internal control over servicing of securitized credit card
receivables, which is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
proper servicing of securitized credit card receivables, in compliance with the
Chase Credit Card Master Trust Fourth Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing
Agreement dated as of October 15, 2004.

There are inherent limitations in any internal control, including the
possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls.
Accordingly, even effective internal control can provide only reasonable
assurance with respect to servicing of securitized credit card receivables.
Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control
may vary over time.

Management of the Bank, as servicer of the Chase Credit Card Master Trust,
assessed its internal control over servicing of securitized credit card
receivables as of December 31, 2004, in compliance with the Chase Credit Card
Master Trust Fourth Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of October 15, 2004, in relation to the criteria for effective internal
control established in "Internal Control-Integrated Framework" issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this
assessment, management believes that the Bank, as servicer of the Chase Credit
Card Master Trust, maintained effective internal control over servicing of
securitized credit card receivables as of December 31, 2004, in compliance with
the Chase Credit Card Master Trust Fourth Amended and Restated Pooling and
Servicing Agreement dated as of October 15, 2004, based on the criteria for
effective internal control established in "Internal Control-Integrated
Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.


/s/ Raymond Fischer
------------------------
Raymond Fischer
Chief Financial Officer
Chase Bank USA, N.A.

/s/ Keith Schuck
------------------------
Keith Schuck
President
Chase Bank USA, N.A.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000837290
<NAME> SHERRI NITTA
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,682
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,298
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,334
<PP&E>                                         166,817
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,775
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,910
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,322
<BONDS>                                         39,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,944
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,465
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   132,910
<SALES>                                          9,786
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,811
<CGS>                                            6,683
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,683
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   556
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 625
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,315
<INCOME-TAX>                                       880
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,435
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,435
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2004-J5
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-J5


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

     (i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
     preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer
     under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

     (ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master
     Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout
     such year.




/s/ Joseph M. Candelario                       Dated: March 28, 2005
------------------------

JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Mark Wong                                  Dated: March 28, 2005
-------------

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 51 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 51

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary in 
                    the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 1997

Mr. Hyde submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary in 
                    the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

    Resolved, 

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary (hereinafter in 
this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $12,037,046 for the One Hundred 
Fifth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $5,732,403 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 1997, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 1998; and
            (2) not more than $6,304,643 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 1998, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 1999.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Oversight.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Oversight.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Mellon Financial Corporation
(the Corporation), hereby certifies that the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                         |  |  |  |                               
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------------
|                         |  | 
|Dated: February 25, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Martin G. McGuinn         
|                         |  |  |  | Name: Martin G. McGuinn       
|                         |  |  |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer
AMENDMENT
      TO PROMISSORY NOTE BY AND BETWEEN

    KARIM
      JOSEPH MURRAY AND LARBI JOHN MURRAY

    AND
      RG GLOBAL LIFESTYLES, INC.

    


    This
      Amendment to Promissory Note (“Agreement”) is entered into between Karim Joseph
      Murray and Larbi John Murray ( collectively “Investors”) and RG Global
      Lifestyles, Inc. (“Company”) on November 15, 2005.

    


    WHEREAS,
      on July 1, 2005 Investors and the Company entered into a promissory note wherein
      the Investors loaned the Company $600,000 with a maturity date of 270 days
      from
      its date of execution at an interest rate of 8.0% (“Promissory
      Note”);

    


    WHEREAS,
      the Investor and the Company prefer to terminate such Promissory Note and
      convert the $600,000, plus accrued interest, into the Company’s current
      investment offering in the form of its Note and Warrant Agreement;

    


    NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the agreements set
      forth herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
      sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as
      follows:

    


    
      	 	
              1.

            	
              Termination
                of the Promissory Note.
                The Promissory Note between the parties executed on July 1, 2005
                is hereby
                terminated as of the date of this
                Agreement.

            


    

    


    
      	 	
              2.

            	
              Conversion
                of Investment to Note and Warrant Agreement.
                The parties hereby agree and accept that the investment of $600,000,
                plus
                interest accrued up to and including November 15, 2005, is to be
                converted
                immediately into the Company’s current round of investment financing under
                the terms and conditions of the Company’s Note and Warrant Agreement, and
                all exhibits thereto.

            


    

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the
      date
      above.

    


    RG
      Global
      Lifestyles, Inc.:

    


    /s/                                                

    Lou
      Knickerbocker

    Chief
      Executive Officer

    


    Investors:

    


     

    
      	
              /s/                                                
                

              Karim Joseph Murray

            	
              /s/                                                
                
Larbi John
              Murray


    

     

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        
        

        1