alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit (24)

                       MERCANTILE BANKSHARES CORPORATION
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit (24)

                       MERCANTILE BANKSHARES CORPORATION
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned Directors of MERCANTILE
BANKSHARES CORPORATION, a Maryland Corporation, hereby constitute and appoint H.
FURLONG BALDWIN and ALAN D. YARBRO, or either of them acting alone, the true and
lawful agents and attorneys in fact of the undersigned in each case with full
power and authority in either of said agents and attorneys in fact, to sign for
the undersigned and in their respective names as Directors of the Corporation
the Annual Report of the Corporation to the Securities and Exchange Commission
for the year 1999, on Form 10-K, filed under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and any amendment or amendments to such Form 10-K hereby
ratifying and confirming all acts taken by such agents and attorneys in fact, or
either of them, as herein authorized.

Date:     March 14, 2000

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                <C>        <C>                          <C>
/s/ George L. Bunting, Jr.         Director   /s/ Mary Junck               Director
-------------------------------               ---------------------------
George L. Bunting, Jr.                        Mary Junck

/s/ Christian H. Poindexter        Director   /s/ Robert A. Kinsley        Director
-------------------------------               ---------------------------
Christian H. Poindexter                       Robert A. Kinsley

/s/ Freeman A. Hrabowski, III      Director   /s/ Thomas M. Bancroft, Jr.   Director
-------------------------------               ---------------------------
Freeman A. Hrabowski, III                     Thomas M. Bancroft, Jr.

/s/ Darrell D. Friedman            Director   /s/ William J. McCarthy      Director
-------------------------------               ---------------------------
Darrell D. Friedman                           William J. McCarthy

/s/ Morton B. Plant                Director                                Director
-------------------------------               ---------------------------
Morton B. Plant

/s/ William R. Brody               Director                                Director
-------------------------------               ---------------------------
William R. Brody

/s/ Donald J. Shepard              Director                                Director
-------------------------------               ---------------------------
Donald J. Shepard
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED><F1>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       2,972,249
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         195,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,880,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 10,891,420
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,858,720
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,861,509
<LOANS>                                     67,771,350
<ALLOWANCE>                                    918,036
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              90,932,603
<DEPOSITS>                                  81,436,876
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,360,124
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,523,163
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              90,932,603
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,999,755
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,183,566
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 3,340
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,186,661
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,776,846
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,789,371
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,397,290
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  335,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  32
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,015,184
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,583,722
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,022,247
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.73
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.77
<LOANS-NON>                                    118,130
<LOANS-PAST>                                   379,009
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             1,013,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               715,230
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  170,909
<RECOVERIES>                                    38,715
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              918,036
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           918,036
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
<FN>
<F1> A SUBSEQUENT 5% STOCK DIVIDEND WAS ISSUED IN APRIL 1996 AND NOVEMBER 1997 
AS WELL AS A 100% STOCK DIVIDEND IN FIRST QUARTER 1998.  COMMON STOCK HAS NOT
BEEN RESTATED, HOWEVER EARNINGS PER SHARE HAS BEEN RESTATED.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

FLORIDA CITIZENS ’ ALLIANCE, INC., Appellant,

v.

SCHOOL BOARD OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 2 3

- 934

[ August 17, 2023 ]

Appeal of a non

- final order from the Circuit Court for the Nine teenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County ; Janet C. Croom , Judge; L.T. Case

No. 2022

- CA

- 970

.

Brantley Oakey of The Law Office of Brantley Oakey, Naples , for appellant.

Jeffrey D. Slanker

, Mitchell J. Herring , and Mat thew J. Carson of Sniffen & Spellman, P.A. , Tallahassee

, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., G ROSS and L EVINE , JJ., concur

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 10.21

SECOND MODIFICATION AGREEMENT AND WAIVER  Secured Loan

THIS SECOND MODIFICATION AGREEMENT ("Agreement") dated as of December 22, 2010, is entered into by and among MAUI LAND &
PINEAPPLE COMPANY, INC., a corporation formed under the laws of the State of Hawaii ("Borrower"), WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as sole
Lender signatory to the Loan Agreement (as defined below) ("Lender"), and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ("Wells
Fargo") as Administrative Agent under the Loan Agreement (in such capacity, the "Administrative Agent").

R E C I T A L S

NOW,
THEREFORE, Borrower, Administrative Agent and Lenders agree as follows:

---







---





The
defined terms "Kahului Mortgage," Kahului Notes," "Kahului Release Price," and "Kahului SPA" are hereby deleted.



---











---



---



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower, Administrative Agent and Lenders have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date first above written.

"ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND LENDER"WELLS FARGO BANK,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONBy:

/s/ JEFF JOHNSONName:Title:


---



"BORROWER"MAUI LAND & PINEAPPLE COMPANY, INC., a
Hawaii corporationBy:

/s/ TIM T. ESAKIName:

Tim T. EsakiTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerBy:

/s/ ADELE H. SUMIDAName:

Adele H. SumidaTitle:

Controller & Secretary


---





LEASEHOLD MORTGAGOR'S CONSENT

The undersigned ("Leasehold Mortgagor") consents to the foregoing Second Modification Agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby and reaffirms its obligations under the Fee and Leasehold Mortgage with Absolute Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing ("Mortgage") dated as of
November 13, 2007, as amended from time to time, and its waivers, as set forth in the Mortgage, of each and every one of the possible defenses to such obligations. Leasehold Mortgagor further
reaffirms that its obligations under the Mortgage are separate and distinct from Borrower's obligations.

Dated
as of: December 22, 2010

"LEASEHOLD MORTGAGOR"KAPALUA LAND COMPANY, LTD.,
a Hawaii corporationBy:

/s/ TIM T. ESAKIName:

Tim T. EsakiTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerBy:

/s/ ADELE H. SUMIDAName:

Adele H. SumidaTitle:

Controller & Secretary


---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0000837913
<NAME>     GENUS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>     1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      10,359
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,618
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (241)
<INVENTORY>                                  9,255
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,170
<PP&E>                                      30,742
<DEPRECIATION>                             (23,804)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,466
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,810
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                   102,374
<OTHER-SE>                                 (79,718)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,466
<SALES>                                     24,633
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,633
<CGS>                                       13,718
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,639
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               282
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,276
<INCOME-TAX>                                   350
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,926
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,926
<EPS-BASIC>                                 .100
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .090


</TABLE>
NUMBER 13-13-00644-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE OLD AMERICAN COUNTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE 

COMPANY

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus and

Motion for Temporary Relief.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Per Curiam Order

Relator, Old American County Mutual Fire Insurance Company, filed a petition for 

writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief in the above cause on November 20, 

2013. The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion for temporary relief, 

is of the opinion that said motion should be granted. The motion for temporary relief is 

hereby GRANTED, and the trial court proceedings are ordered STAYED pending further 

order of this Court, or until the case is finally decided. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b) 

(“Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is effective until the 
2

case is finally decided.”). The Court requests that the real parties in interest, Jose 

Angel Cavazos, individually and as next friend to Sergio Javier Cavazos, and Lynette 

Garza, by and through counsel, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on 

or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See id. R. 52.4, 52.8. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 21st

day of November, 2013.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 231 (Tuesday, December 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 71497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28334]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration # 14188 and # 14189]


Utah Disaster # UT-00034

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of UTAH dated 11/18/2014.
    Incident: Severe storms & flooding.
    Incident Period: 09/27/2014.
    Effective Date: 11/18/2014.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/20/2015.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 08/18/2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:
Primary Counties: Carbon.
Contiguous Counties: Utah, Duchesne, Emery, Sanpete, Uintah, Utah.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      4.125
  Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      2.063
  Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      6.000
  Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      4.000
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.625
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.625
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit      4.000
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.625
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14188 B 
and for economic injury is 14189 0.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Utah

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: November 18, 2014.
Maria Contreras-Sweet,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014-28334 Filed 12-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL RICHARD NEUMAN,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

ALAN M. CROGAN, Chief Probation

Officer County of Riverside,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 12-57013

D.C. No. 5:11-cv-00327-DOCDTB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 8, 2014

Pasadena, California

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Michael Richard Neuman (Neuman) appeals the district court’s

dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition premised on the

prosecutor’s allegedly improper use of peremptory challenges to exclude “people

FILED

JUL 15 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
of color” from the jury in violation of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986). We

have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253, and we affirm.

Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, we must defer to

the state court’s determination that there was no purposeful discrimination unless

its decision was: (1) “contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of,

clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United

States,” or (2) “based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the

evidence presented. . . .” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d).

The California Court of Appeal’s determination that the totality of the

circumstances failed to raise an inference of discrimination was not contrary to or

an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law, and the state court

did not unreasonably determine the facts. As the state court noted, see People v.

Neuman, 176 Cal. App.4th 571, 583-84 (2009), Neuman’s challenge is based on a

statistical disparity in the prosecutor’s use of peremptory challenges, yet Neuman

failed to provide sufficient evidence to permit a statistical comparison. See

Williams v. Woodford, 384 F.3d 567, 584 (9th Cir. 2004) (explaining that a habeas

petitioner needed to “point to more facts than the number of African-Americans

struck” to establish a pattern of discriminatory strikes). Because Neuman failed to

produce sufficient facts to raise an inference of discrimination, we need not, and do

2
not, decide whether “people of color” is a cognizable group for the purpose of a

Batson analysis.

We also disagree with Neuman’s contention that a reviewing court may not

review the record to discern race-neutral reasons for peremptory challenges,

regardless of whether those reasons were proffered by the prosecutor. See, e.g.,

Paulino v. Castro, 371 F.3d 1083, 1091-92 (9th Cir. 2004) (“[W]e may consider

whether the record contains entirely plausible reasons, independent of race, why a

prosecutor may have exercised peremptories . . .”) (citation and quotation marks

omitted).

AFFIRMED.

3
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

HAROLD HUNT

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 1621

[ March 4, 2021 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Barbara R. Duffy

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 11

- 007506CF10A

.

Harold Hunt, Monticello, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, C IKLIN and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
MARHC 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FORM
10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                    JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                      MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              278,873
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        15,403
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    294,276
<PP&E>                                               89,205
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (9,359)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      688,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               255,549
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             4,353,237
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                              6,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       (4,099,226)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        688,915
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      2,805
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1,085,930
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (1,083,125)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (1,083,125)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1,083,125)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.19)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2548

L. A. GRIER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FIRST MARINER BANK, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-3135-JFM) Submitted: June 21, 2001 Decided: June 27, 2001 Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lorenzo Grier, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Omar Lawson, LAWSON & KIPP, Fairfax, Virginia; John Sears Simcox, Karen Montgomery Crabtree, SIMCOX & BARCLAY, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Lorenzo Grier seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his discrimination suit. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, because Grier’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)).The district court’s order was entered on the docket on November 2, 2000. Grier’s notice of appeal was filed on December 7, 2000. Because Grier failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED