alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 441

AN ACT

To amend Public Law 107–10 to authorize a

United States plan to endorse and obtain observer status for Taiwan at the annual summit ofthe World Health Assembly in May 2003 in Geneva, Switzerland, and for other purposes.

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 441

AN ACT

To amend Public Law 107–10 to authorize a United States

plan to endorse and obtain observer status for Taiwan

at the annual summit of the World Health Assembly

in May 2003 in Geneva, Switzerland, and for other purposes.
2

•HR 441 EH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO PUBLIC LAW 107–10.

4 (a) FINDINGS.—Section 1(a) of Public Law 107–10

5 (115 Stat. 17) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing:

7 ‘‘(14) The government of Taiwan, in response

8 to an appeal from the United Nations and the

9 United States for resources to control the spread of

10 HIV/AIDS, donated $1,000,000 to the Global Fund

11 to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.’’.

12 (b) PLAN.—Section 1(b)(1) of Public Law 107–10

13 (115 Stat. 17) is amended by striking ‘‘May 2002’’ and

14 inserting ‘‘May 2003’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 11,

2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-7179

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RODERICK LAMAR WILLIAMS, a/k/a Rox,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Statesville. Kenneth D. Bell, District Judge. (5:03-cr-00004-KDB-DSC-8)

Submitted: February 27, 2024 Decided: March 1, 2024

Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roderick Lamar Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7179 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/01/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Roderick Lamar Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to 

correct the record under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Vanderhorst, 927 F.3d 824, 826-

27 (4th Cir. 2019) (stating standard). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. 

United States v. Williams, No. 5:03-cr-00004-KDB-DSC-8 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 1, 2023). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7179 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/01/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
================================================================================

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

        CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
                                    EXCHANGE
                                  ACT OF 1934

                   DATE OF REPORT: May 21, 1998 (May 7, 1998)
                                   --------------------------




                         Commission file number 1-11803

                          AMERICAN PAD & PAPER COMPANY
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

          Delaware                                          04-3164298
(State or other jurisdiction of                          (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                         Identification No.)

17304 Preston Road, Suite 700, Dallas, TX                   75252-5613
(Address of principal executive offices)                    (Zip Code)

       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (972) 733-6200






================================================================================

<PAGE>   2

Item 5. Other Events.

        On May 7, 1998, American Pad & Paper Company (the "Company") issued a
press release announcing first quarter 1998 results. The Company reported a net
loss of $2.1 million, or $.08 per share on net sales of $161.6 million for the
first quarter ended March 31, 1998. Comparatively, the Company reported a net
income of $4.0 million or $.14 per share, on net sales of $149.9 million for the
first quarter ended March 31, 1997. This press release is incorporated herein as
Exhibit 99.2.

Item 7. Exhibits.

        99.2 Press release by the Company dated May 7, 1998.


                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

American Pad & Paper Company


/s/ William W. Solomon, Jr.                     May 21, 1998
---------------------------------               --------------------------------
William W. Solomon, Jr.                         Date
Chief Accounting Officer
<PAGE>   3

                               INDEX TO EXHIBITS




EXHIBIT NO.                       DESCRIPTION
-----------                       -----------

   99.2          Press release by the Company dated May 7, 1998.
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of China Broadband, Inc. (the "Company")
        on
        Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc Urbach, Principal
        Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        China Broadband, Inc. and will be retained by China Broadband, Inc. and
        furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
  May
                  20, 2008
              By:
              */s/
                    Marc Urbach*Marc
                    Urbach*(President
                    and Principal Executive
                    Officer)*
1

MEP State Partnership Support Program

Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO)

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Where can I include Letters of Support in my proposal?

A: Letters of support are not required. Please see Section IV.2.b of the NOFO. 

Applicants should carefully follow the instructions and recommendations regarding 

attachments and use the Download Submitted Forms and Application features on 

grants.gov

Q: Where can I find the recorded information webinar?

A. The recorded information webinar can be viewed at the following link: 

https://bluejeans.com/s/twGqVB0zX62

Q: Who is eligible to apply?

A. Applicants must be a U.S. based for-profit or not-for-profit institution or organization. 

An eligible applicant may work individually or may include proposed subawards to other 

organizations to carry out the activities described in the proposal.

Q: What is the application due date?

A. Full Applications must be received at grants.gov no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern 

Time, Wednesday, March 17, 2021. Applications received after this deadline will not be 

reviewed or considered. Paper applications will not be accepted.

Q. What is the page limit for the technical proposal?

A. The technical proposal is limited to twenty-five (25) pages double spaced, noting the 

limit of two (2) pages for the Executive Summary. Resumes are not included in the page 

count of the Project Narrative. However, if resumes are included, resumes must be a 

maximum of two (2) pages each.
EXHIBIT (21)
                             THE MIDLAND COMPANY
                               AND SUBSIDIARIES
                EXHIBIT (21) - SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                              DECEMBER 31, 1996

        The subsidiaries of the Registrant as of December 31, 1996, all of which
are included in the consolidated financial statements, are as follows:

                                                                     Percentage
                                                  State of            of Voting
                                                Incorporation        Stock Owned
                                               ---------------      ------------

M/G Transport Services, Inc.                         Ohio                100
Midland-Guardian Co.                                 Ohio                100
MGT Services, Inc.                                   Ohio                100
CS Crable Sportswear, Inc.                           Ohio                100

SUBSIDIARIES OF MIDLAND-GUARDIAN CO.

American Modern Insurance Group, Inc.                Ohio                100
Marbury Agency, Inc.                                 Ohio                100

SUBSIDIARIES OF AMERICAN MODERN INSURANCE GROUP, INC.

American Modern Home Insurance Co.                   Ohio                100
American Family Home Insurance Co.                  Florida              100
Atlas Insurance Agency, Inc.                         Ohio                100
American Modern Life Insurance Company               Ohio                100
Midwest Enterprises, Inc.                           Florida              100
Lloyds Modern Corporation                            Texas               100
American Modern Home Service Company                 Ohio                100

SUBSIDIARIES OF AMERICAN MODERN HOME INSURANCE CO.

American Modern Lloyds Insurance Co.                 Texas               100
American Southern Home Insurance Co.                Florida              100
American Western Home Insurance Co.                Oklahoma              100
Guardian Underwriters Insurance Company, Inc.    Pennsylvania            100

SUBSIDIARY OF AMERICAN WESTERN HOME INSURANCE CO.

American Modern Life Insurance Company of
  Arizona, Inc.                                     Arizona              100

SUBSIDIARY OF MIDWEST ENTERPRISES, INC.

Sunbelt General Agency, Inc.                        Alabama              100

      The names of five wholly-owned subsidiaries of The Midland Company are not
shown above as such individual listing is not required.

                                       15

<PAGE>
10276.

#### Densley *v.*The State.

Stephens, J.

1. The charge of the court is not subject to the objection that it stated unfairly to the defendant the State’s theory of the homicide, or that it was unintelligible or confusing to the jury.

2. The excerpts from the charge of the court excepted to cannot be construed as containing any expression or intimation of opinion on the facts., “To declare the law applicable to a given state of facts is no expression or intimation of opinion as to whether any of the facts referred to do or do not exist in the case on trial.” *Yarborough*v. *State,*86 *Ga.*396 (12 S. E. 650).

3. There being evidence of an actual assault by the person killed upon the person killing, voluntary manslaughter was an'issue in the ease, and the law relative thereto was properly given in charge to the jury.

*137Decided July 28, 1919.

Rehearing denied September 18, 1919.

Conviction of involuntary manslaughter; from Lowndes superior court—Judge Thomas. October 26,1918.

*Bennet & Harrell, Whitaker & Dukes,*for plaintiff in error.

*Olifford E. Hay, solicitor-general,*contra.

4. Neither involuntary manslaughter nor accidental homicide having been put in issue by the evidence, or the evidence taken in connection wiijj the defendant’s statement, it was not error, in the absence of a timely written request, for the trial judge to fail to give in charge the law relative to involuntary manslaughter or accidental homicide.

5, The other assignments of error are without merit, and the evident® supports the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Bloodioorth, J., conowr.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,937
<SECURITIES>                                     7,227
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     15,444
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         163,699
<DEPRECIATION>                               (130,984)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,151
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         21,770
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           160
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,960
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,151
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,125
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,935
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,841
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,349
<INCOME-TAX>                                       207
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,142
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    107
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,249
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.68
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Magnitude  Information Systems,
Inc. (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended  September 30, 2005
(the  "Form  10-QSB"),  I,  Steven D.  Rudnik,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company,  certify, as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my  knowledge,  that the Company's  Form 10-QSB fully  complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information  contained in the Form 10-QSB,  fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  November 11, 2005                /s/  Steven D. Rudnik
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Steven D. Rudnik
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Magnitude Information
Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended June 30,
2005 (the "Form 10-QSB"), I, Steven D. Rudnik, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge, that the Company's Form 10-QSB fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: October 26, 2005                 /s/ Steven D. Rudnik
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Steven D. Rudnik
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer


                                                                              20
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    Exhibit 23.3


               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants



American Realty Trust, Inc.
  Dallas, Texas

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting a part of this Registration Statement of our report dated March 18,
1998, relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Income
Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. appearing in the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.




                                                /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

Dallas, Texas
May 13, 1998
#### Ellen S. Botsford v. Andrew J. Murphy.

[See 47 Mich. 537.)

*Costs*— Charge *for obtaining copy of record*

Tlio charge for obtaining a copy of the record for the printer is a proper item in taxing costs in cases at law.

. Motion for retaxation of costs.

Submitted and denied April 18.

*Jacob V. Rogers*for the motion.

*Padgham da, Padgham*against..
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEVIN L. PERRY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

SAN DIEGO COUNTY, a public entity,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 14-56618

D.C. No. 3:14-mc-00381-JLS

MEMORANDUM*

KEVIN L. PERRY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

VEOLIA TRANSPORT, DBA Veolia 

Transportation Services, Inc., A Maryland 

Corporation; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 14-56707

D.C. No. 3:11-cv-00176-LABRBB

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Janis L. Sammartino, District Judge, Presiding

Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

FILED

NOV 7 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-56618 

Submitted October 25, 2016**

Before: LEAVY, GRABER, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Kevin L. Perry appeals pro se from the district 

court’s order dismissing his action for failure to comply with a vexatious litigant 

order (No. 14-56618), and the district court’s order denying his Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 60(b) motion for relief from judgment (No. 14-56707). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion both the 

district court’s denial of leave to file a complaint pursuant to a vexatious litigant 

order, In re Fillbach, 223 F.3d 1089, 1090-91 (9th Cir. 2000), and the district 

court’s denial of a Rule 60(b) motion, Harman v. Harper, 7 F.3d 1455, 1458 (9th 

Cir. 1993). We affirm.

As to No. 14-56618, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying

Perry’s motion for leave to file a complaint because Perry failed to comply with 

the vexatious litigant order entered against him. See Perry v. Veolia Transp., et al., 

No. 11-CV–176–LAB–RBB, 2011 WL 4566449 at *9-12 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 30, 

2011). Perry failed to submit a copy of the vexatious litigant order with his motion 

as required and falsely certified that his proposed complaint raised new issues not 

previously raised in a prior state or federal action.

 

** The panel unanimously concludes these cases are suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
3 14-56618 

As to No. 14-56707, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying 

Perry’s motion for relief from judgment where Perry never appealed from the 

judgment, presented no reason for the nearly three-year delay in filing his motion, 

and did not establish any basis for relief. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(5)-(6); Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 60(c)(1) (Rule 60(b)(5) and 60(b)(6) motions must be filed “within a 

reasonable time”); see also In re Pac. Far East Lines, Inc., 889 F.2d 242, 249 (9th 

Cir. 1989) (“What constitutes a reasonable time depends on the facts of each 

case.”).

14-56618: AFFIRMED.

14-56707: AFFIRMED.
-19-

 
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. *   The statements of cash receipts and disbursements reflect only cash transactions and do notinclude transactions that would be recorded in financial statements presented on the accrual basisof accounting. The Trust is required to distribute all funds received after payment of expenses.Accordingly, the Trust has not prepared any statements of financial condition or cash flows.     Date:May 13, 2011 /s/ Joel Faden     Joel Faden, Joel Faden & Company, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 231 (Tuesday, December 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71425-71426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28406]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Statement of Delegation of Authority

    Notice is hereby given that I have delegated to the Director, 
National Institutes of Health (NIH), or his or her successor, the 
authorities vested in the Secretary of Health and Human Services under 
Section 377E (a) of the HIV Organ Policy Equity Act, (Pub. L. 113-51), 
which amends the Public Health Service Act to require development and

[[Page 71426]]

publication of criteria for the conduct of research relating to 
transplantation of organs from donors infected with human 
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) into individuals who are infected with HIV 
before receiving such organ.
    These authorities may be redelegated. Exercise of this authority 
shall be in accordance with established policies, procedures, 
guidelines, and regulations as prescribed by the Secretary. The 
Secretary retains the authority to submit reports to Congress and 
promulgate regulations.
    I hereby affirm and ratify any actions taken by the Director, NIH, 
or his or her subordinates, which involved the exercise of the 
authorities delegated herein prior to the effective date of the 
delegation.

    Dated: November 25, 2014.
Sylvia M. Burwell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-28406 Filed 12-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P