alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4227

AN ACT

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to

extend to 2005 the alternative minimum tax relief available in 2003 and 2004 and to index suchrelief for inflation.

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4227

AN ACT

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend

to 2005 the alternative minimum tax relief available in

2003 and 2004 and to index such relief for inflation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4227 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited at the ‘‘Middle-Class Alter3 native Minimum Tax Relief Act of 2004’’.

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX RE5 LIEF TO 2005.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraphs (A) and (B) of

7 section 55(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 are

8 each amended by striking ‘‘and 2004’’ and inserting ‘‘,

9 2004, and 2005’’.

10 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Subsection (d) of

11 section 55 of such Code is amended by inserting after

12 paragraph (3) the following new paragraph:

13 ‘‘(4) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—

14 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any

15 taxable year beginning in calendar year 2005,

16 the $58,000 amount contained in paragraph

17 (1)(A) and the $40,250 amount contained in

18 paragraph (1)(B) shall each be increased by an

19 amount equal to—

20 ‘‘(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by

21 ‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de22 termined under section 1(f)(3) for the cal23 endar year in which the taxable year be24 gins, determined by substituting ‘2003’ for

25 ‘1992’ in subparagraph (B) thereof.
3

•HR 4227 EH

1 ‘‘(B) ROUNDING.—Any increase deter2 mined under subparagraph (A) which is not a

3 multiple of $50 shall be rounded to the next

4 lowest multiple of $50.’’.

5 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

6 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

7 December 31, 2004.

Passed the House of Representatives May 5, 2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Clark *v.*State.

Opinion delivered October 29, 1928.

*J. O. A. Bush*and *Dexter Bush,*for appellant.

*E. W. Applegate,*Attorney General, and *John L. Garter,*Assistant, for appellee.

Humphreys, J.

Appellants were indicted and convicted in the circuit court of Nevada County for manufacturing liquor, and, as a punishment therefor, were adjudged to serve a term of one year in the State Penitentiary, from which they have duly prosecuted an appeal to this court.

The only error assigned for a reversal of the judgment is that the court erred in refusing to give appellants’ requested instruction No. 1, which reads as follows:

“If you find from the evidence in this case that the defendants just happened upon this still, and stayed there for fifteen or twenty minutes, and did not act toward the manufacturing of the whiskey which was made there, then you will find them not guilty.”

*182The requested instruction singled out or emphasized the testimony of appellants, and, on that account, amounted to a request upon the weight of the evidence. It was not error to refuse the request. The court gave general instructions covering the law applicable to the facts in the case, which was all he was required to do. *Smith*v. *State,*162 Ark. 458, 258 S. W. 349.

The general instructions given by the court were as follows:

“The defendants are on trial charged with the making or manufacturing, or being interested in making and manufacturing, alcoholic, vinous, malt, spirituous and fermented liquors. The .burden is on the State to prove the defendants’ guilt by the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. If you entertain a reasonable doubt of the defendants’ gTiilt, it will be your duty to give them the benefit of the doubt, land acquit them. They are presumed to be innocent of the offense1 for which they are being tried. That presumption accompanies them, shields them and protects them against conviction until it is overcome by the evidence in the case, convincing you beyond a reasonable doubt of their guilt.

“If you find from the evidence in this case, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendants, in Nevada County, Arkansas, at any time within three years before this indictment was returned into court, were engaged in the manufacture of alcoholic, vinous, malt, spirituous or fermented liquors,' or if you find from the evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, that they assisted in the manufacture of such liquors, it will be your duty to convict them and assess their punishment at imprisonment in the penitentiary for one year.

“Should you convict these defendants, the form of your verdict should 'be: ‘We, the jury, find the defendants guilty,’ and assess their punishment as I have indicated. 'Should you acquit them, the form of your verdict should be: ‘We, the jury, find the defendants not guilty.’ One of you sign the verdict as foreman.”

No error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                        
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET AT  SEPTEMBER  30,  1998 AND THE RELATED
CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS  OF  OPERATIONS  AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE
MONTHS  ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30, 1998 OF  STRATFORD  AMERICAN  CORPORATION  AND ITS
SUBSIDIARIES  AND IS QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1998 
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       1 
<CASH>                                           34,000 
<SECURITIES>                                          0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                    60,000 
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0 
<INVENTORY>                                           0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 64,000 
<PP&E>                                           82,000 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   52,000 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  194,000 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           118,000 
<BONDS>                                               0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0 
<PREFERRED>                                           0 
<COMMON>                                         59,000 
<OTHER-SE>                                   (1,154,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    194,000 
<SALES>                                           2,000 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 44,000 
<CGS>                                                 0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    16,000 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                398,000 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               32,000 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (402,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (402,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                1,109,000 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0 
<CHANGES>                                             0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    707,000 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .12 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .12 
        

</TABLE>
ICE 2006 Overview 

Dr. P. Jonathon Phillips - NIST 

March 22-23, 2006 

NRECA Conference Facility 

Arlington, Virginia 
 

 

 

 

ICE 2006 Schedule 

• Today 

– Key points in afternoon talk 

• 1 April 2006 

– ICE 2006 Protocol released 

• 15 June 2006 

– Executables submission deadline 

– ICE 2006 evaluation begins 

• December 2006 

– ICE 2006 Final Report released 
 

ICE 2006 

• Executable 

– Windows 2003 Service Pack 1 

– Linux 

– Matlab executables 
 

 

 

Properties 

• 1 to 1 Matching 

• Fully automatic 

• Type of iris images 

– Single Right 

– Single Left 

– Both irises (single Right and single left) 

• Command line call 
1 to 1 Matching 

Query

T

a

r

g

e

t

= 

= 
 

 

 

 

 

Executable calling signature 

1-1 Matching: 

• executable parameter_file

 image_directory 

target_sigset 

query_sigset 

similarity_file 

quality_target_sigset

 quality_query_sigset 
 

 

File format 

• parameter_file 

XML- xpath reader on bbs 
 

 

File format 

target_sigset 

query_sigset 

quality_target_sigset

 quality_query_sigset 

BEE sig-set - Btools posted on bbs 
 

 

File Formats 

similarity_file 

BEE v2 similarity matrix - BTools 
 

 

 

FAQ 

• FRVT 2006 FAQ 

– www.frvt.org 

• ICE 2006 FAQ 

– iris.nist.gov/ice 

• Submit question to: ice@nist.gov 
ICE 2006 

• There will be surprises.... 

• NOT a test on Notre Dame 

data
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We consent to the Inclusion in this registration statement on Form S-3
(Registration No. 333-       ) of our report dated March 6, 1998 on our audits
of the consolidated financial statements of International Home Foods, Inc. as of
December 31, 1997 and 1996 and for the years then ended. We also consent to the
reference to our Firm under the caption "Experts".
 



                                        /s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

                                                  August 13, 1998
#### M. A. McClure, etc., *v.*E. W. Scott, et al.

Religious Societies — Property Held in Trust for Benefit of Members. -

The evidence was held to show that property was placed in control of a church for the benefit of its members as a parsonage, and if not so used to be made contributory to the payment of the officiating minister, and to be held in trust for such purpose.

APPEAL FROM WOODFORD CIRCUIT COURT.

December 10, 1872.

*Porter & Wallace, for appellants.*

*Turner & Tntyman, Thornton, for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Hardin:

The parol evidence satisfied us that although, for certain purposes, stock certificates' were given to the contributors of the money used in paying for the property and not withstanding the form' of the most of the conveyances, the original design of Roolman and Terrill & Thorton was to place the property under the control of the church for the benefit of its members, as a parsonage, if so used, and if not so occupied, still to be made contributory to the payment of the officiating minister of that congregation; and according to the cotrolling principles of the decisions of this court in the case of *McKinney v. Griggs, etc.,*5 Bush 407, and other authorities, the court below properly treated the title as held in trust for said uses, and the property as having been by parol arrangement at least, dedicated to the use of the congregation.

Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed.*
Exhibit 13.2







SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Vuance Ltd. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: June 13, 2011

/s/ Mickey Ben HarushBy: Mickey Ben HarushTitle: Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 431

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 

Indian employment credit and the depreciation rules for property used 

predominantly within an Indian reservation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2003

Mr. SULLIVAN (for himself, Mr. COLE, Mr. LUCAS of Oklahoma, and Mr. 

STUPAK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently 

extend the Indian employment credit and the depreciation rules for property used predominantly within an 

Indian reservation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF INDIAN EMPLOY4 MENT CREDIT AND DEPRECIATION RULES 

5 FOR PROPERTY ON INDIAN RESERVATIONS. 

6 (a) EMPLOYMENT CREDIT.—Section 45A of the In7 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking sub8 section (f). 
2

•HR 431 IH 

1 (b) DEPRECIATION RULES.—Subsection (j) of section 

2 168 of such Code is amended by striking paragraph (8).

Æ
www.nist.gov/osac

OSAC Registry Approved Standards 

FY 2016

The Organization of Scientific Area Committees (OSAC) for Forensic Science 

Registry serves as a trusted repository of high-quality, science-based 

standards and guidelines that address discipline-specific forensic science 

needs. Documents posted on the OSAC Registry have been developed using a 

consensus-based process that allows participation and comment from all 

relevant stakeholders and have been assessed to be sound by forensic science 

practitioners, academic researchers, measurement scientists and statisticians. 

The following three documents were effective on the OSAC Registry at the 

end of fiscal year 2016 (ending September 30, 2016):

Fire and Explosion Investigation

• NFPA 921 Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigation, 2014 Edition (effective September 20, 

2016).

Seized Drugs

• ASTM E2329-14 Standard Practice for Identification of Seized Drugs (effective January 27, 

2016).

Interdisciplinary

• ISO/IEC 17025:2005 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration 

Laboratories (effective September 27, 2016).
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

STEPHEN WECHSLER,

Appellant,

v.

WYCLIFFE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB HOMEOWNERS’

ASSOCIATION, INC., and THE VILLAGE OF WELLINGTON,

Appellees.

No. 4D22-2099

[May 18, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Maxine Cheesman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2021-CA004289-XXXX-MB.

Barry S. Mittelberg and Lizzie M. Ramos of Barry S. Mittelberg, P.A., 

Coral Springs, for appellant.

Scott D. Alexander of Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke, Piper & 

Hochman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee The Village of Wellington.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, GERBER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1.

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


         I, Patrick Freeman, Chief Executive Officer of Cordia Corporation (the
"Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
period June 30, 2003 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


                                                     By: /s/ Patrick Freeman
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Patrick Freeman
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2003


-------------------

*    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
     been provided to Cordia Corporation and will be retained by Cordia
     Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its
     staff upon request.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000635

12-JUN-2015

08:05 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,374
<SECURITIES>                                   284,477
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               287,507
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 287,507
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,280
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           11,200
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,241
<OTHER-SE>                                     215,786
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   287,507
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                52,207
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,475
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (179,311)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (179,311)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
                                              

</TABLE>
H. R. 4232

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4025

Feather Lakes Way in Kingwood, Texas, as the ‘‘Congressman Jack Fields Post

Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

4025 Feather Lakes Way in Kingwood, Texas, and known as the

Kingwood Post Office, is hereby redesignated as the ‘‘Congressman

Jack Fields Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Congressman

Jack Fields Post Office’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Looking Ahead

Opportunities for NIST in America’s Innovation Ecosystem

Walter G. Copan

Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology

and NIST Director 
NIST Priorities for Impact 

2

Advanced Communications 

Technology and Standards 

for 5G and Beyond

Standards Leadership for 

the Nation

Advanced Manufacturing 

and Supply Chain

Cybersecurity and 

Privacy

Strengthening America’s 

Competitive Position in 

the World

Image credits: Pixabay
Advanced Communications Technology and Standards 

for 5G and Beyond

NIST is the U.S. government’s leader in 

fundamental and applied research, 

standards, and government-academiaindustry coordination for advanced 

communications technologies 

3

Image credit: B. Hayes/NIST

• Leadership and technical expertise in 

advanced communications-related 

standards bodies 

• National Advanced Spectrum and 

Communications Test Network 

• Meeting the future communications 

needs of our first responders

• Shaping the future of wireless R&D –

roadmaps, 5G testbed 

• NCCoE partnering with industry to 

address 5G cybersecurity challenges

• Strengthening supply chain security
Standards Leadership for the Nation 

• Standards are critical in the face of 

increasing global competition 

• NIST research and work in standards 

development 

• NIST has unique responsibilities to 

coordinate federal activities 

440 NIST technical staff lead 

and participate in more than 

100 unique standards 

development organizations, 

contributing their expertise 

in over 1,500 standards 

activities

4
Advanced Manufacturing and Supply Chain

The 2018 Strategy for American 

Leadership in Advanced 

Manufacturing outlines three 

goals for the nation: 

 develop new technologies, 

 build the workforce, and 

 expand domestic supply 

chains

NIST is uniquely positioned to 

deliver on these goals 

5

© Earl Zubkoff
Cybersecurity and Privacy 

6

Cybersecurity and privacy at 

the forefront of concern for 

the U.S. 

NIST has critical roles in setting 

cybersecurity policy for the 

government 

NIST leads the broader 

community on cybersecurity 

and privacy issues 

Image credit: Pixabay
Strengthening 

America’s Competitive 

Position in the World

NIST’s programs support the U.S. 

innovation base: research and standards 

in high value emerging technology areas 

World-leading programs help ensure the 

necessary talent, research 

infrastructure, and partnerships in U.S.

Research facilities and access to talent 

top areas of concern 

Image: J. Burrus/NIST
10933.

#### Spencer *v.*The State.

Decided December 9, 1919.

Indictment for manufacture of liquor; from Terrell superior court-—Judge Worrill. September 1, 1919.

*R. R. Jones,*for plaintiff in error.

*B. T. Castelloiv, solicitor-general, R. R. Arnold,*contra.

Luke, J.

The evidence in this ease amply warranted the conviction of the defendant. For no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*