alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Laycor Ventures Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A-1 for the year ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Robert Wayne Morgan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated this 14th day of February, 2007.





| | ROBERT WAYNE MORGAN                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Robert Wayne Morgan                                
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

















---
9901.

#### Phillips *v.*Stapleton, solicitor.

Decided January 16, 1919.

Confiscation; from city court of Miller county—Judge Geer. June 10, 1918.

P. *D. Rich,*for plaintiff in error.

*N. L. Stapleton,*solicitor, contra.

Jenkins, J.

A proceeding to condemn an automobile used on a public road or private way of this State in conveying liquors or beverages, the sale or possession of which is prohibited by law (Ga. L. 1917, Ex. Sess., p. 16, see. 20), is summary in its nature, and the provisions of the statute as to this proceeding must be strictly complied with. *Porter*v. *Lively 45 Ga.*159, 161; *Dart*v. *Mayhew,*60 *Ga.*104, 105; *Mabry*v. *Judkins,*66 *Ga.*732; *Hinton*v. *Goode,*73 *Ga.*233; *Parks*v. *Simpson,*124 *Ga.*524 (52 S. E. 616). Under the provisions of the act, it is the duty of the sheriff or other arresting officer seizing t(he vehicle to report such fact to the solicitor of the county, city, or superior court where the seizure is made, “whose duty it shall be within ten days from the time he received said notice to institute condemnation proceedings,” etc. Under the provisions of the act, such a proceeding is barred where commenced more than ten days subsequent to the date of such notice. That the delay in instituting the proceedings in this case was occasioned by the fact that the sheriff, without the knowledge or consent of the defendant, had entrusted the car, while in his possession under such seizure, to another, who, without the connivance of the defendant, took it away and failed to return it, would make no difference in the application of this rule.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Wade, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.*
Opinion issued November 1 9 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 14
- 00540
- CV

——————————— CLIFTON JERRY FRANCI S , JR. , Appellant

V. ADRIAN GARCIA, SHERIFF, HAR RIS COUNTY SHERIFF ’S OFFICE,

AND HARRIS COUNTY, T EXAS , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 190th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2014
- 25685

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Clifton Jerry Francis , Jr., has failed to timely file a brief. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file brief), 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file brief). After being notified that this appeal was subject to2

dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Higley, Huddle, and Lloyd.
H. R. 4299

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 410 South

Jackson Road in Edinburg, Texas, as the ‘‘Dr. Miguel A. Neva ́ rez Post Office

Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

410 South Jackson Road in Edinburg, Texas, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘Dr. Miguel A. Neva ́ rez Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Dr. Miguel

A. Neva ́ rez Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 26, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 26, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15I0124. SIDHI INVESTMENT CORPORATION v. VICKI LEE THRIFT.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

13V322
10692.

#### McAdoo, director-general, *v.*Martin.

Jenkins, P. J.

The plaintiff in the court below sued the director-general of railroads for $50 damages, alleging the killing of a valuable bird dog belonging to the plaintiff, by reason of the negligent operation of a locomotive belonging to the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company while under the control of the director-general. The defendant did not contend that the defendant would not be liable for the negligent killing of the dog. *Seaboard Air-Line Ry.*v. *McDonald,*19 *Ga. App.*627 (91 S. E. 1053). A judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. *Held:*

*486Decided November 19, 1919.

Action for damages; from city court of Hinesville—Judge W. C. Hodges. May 19, 1919.

Application for certiorari was denied by tbe Supreme Court.

*Melville Price,*for plaintiff in error. *O. G. Darsey,*contra.

1 The evidence authorized the verdict.

2. The act of Congress approved March 21, 1918, c. 25, § 10 (40 Staf.. part 1, pp. 451, 456 [U. S. Comp. St. 1918, § 3115%j]), provides: “That carriers while under Federal control shall be subject to^all laws and liabilities as common carriers, whether arising under State or Federal laws or at common law, except in so far as may be inconsistent with the provisions of this act or any other act applicable to such Federal control or with any order -of the President. Actions at law or suits in equity may be brought by and against such carriers and judgments rendered as now provided by law; and in any action at law or suit in equity against the carrier, no defense shall be made thereto upon the ground that the carrier is an instrumentality or agency of the Federal Government.” The contention of the plaintiff in error that the provisions of section 2780 of the Civil Code (1910) are inapplicable, because the suit is brought against the director-general of railroads, is therefore without merit.

3. Even if the portion of the charge excepted to could be treated as erroneous when taken and considered in connection with what was said immediately following it, still the defendant would not be entitled to complain, since the error of the charge affected adversely the rights of the plaintiff only, and was necessarily harmless so far as the rights of the defendant were concerned.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.*
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Q of AHPC Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Alan Zeffer, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Debby Bills, as Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
his knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                         /s/ Alan E. Zeffer
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Name:  Alan E. Zeffer
                                         Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                         Date:  November 19, 2004

                                         /s/ Deborah J. Bills
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Name:  Deborah J. Bills
                                         Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                         Date:  November 19, 2004
| 1. | Paragraph      4.(a) of the Tax Allocation Agreement is replaced with, and superseded by,      the following language: |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | For      purposes of making the computations described herein, Salmon Creek and any      Restricted Subsidiary which becomes a member of the Group (each a "PL      Subgroup Subsidiary") shall, together with Pacific Lumber, be treated as      an affiliated group of corporations ("the PL Subgroup"), the common parent      of which is Pacific Lumber,      provided, however, that the PL Subgroup shall only include any subsidiary      to the extent that such subsidiary meets the test of affiliation under      Section 1504 of the Code as it would apply to the PL      Subgroup. |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| 2. | Paragraph      4.(b) is amended by adding the following language after the first      sentence: |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | For      the avoidance of doubt, Pacific Lumber's net operating losses are      available to offset Salmon Creek's 1999 taxable income recognized on the      sale of its Headwaters timberlands. |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | Paragraphs      5.(a), (b), (c), (d), and (e) of the Tax Allocation Agreement are deleted      and shall not apply. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | MAXXAM      Inc.                |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   |                            |
|   | By:                             | /s/      Paul N. Schwartz |
|   | Title:                          | President |
|   |                            |   |
|   |                            |   |
|   | The      Pacific Lumber Company |
|   |                            |   |
|   | By:                             | /s/      Gary L. Clark |
|   | Title:                          | Vice      President - Finance |
|   |                            | And      Administration |

----
PROMISSORY NOTE
                                 ---------------

                             COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA
                               SEPTEMBER 28, 2005

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Rapidtron, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
(herein called Maker), hereby promises to pay to the order of Judith Creel, a
resident of California (herein called Holder), in lawful money of the United
States of America, the principal sum of FIFTEEN THOUSAND Dollars ($15,000 US),
with interest thereon at the rate as established monthly by Wells Fargo for
Equity loans with a floating rate.

The term of this Note is ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY (120) days.  This term can only
be extended by agreement of the Holder. The Holder will pay the monthly-accrued
interest charged by Wells Fargo on the fifteenth of each month starting in
September.

This Note and the rights and duties of the parties hereunder shall be governed
for all purposes by eh laws of the State of California and the laws of the
United States applicable to transactions within such State.


MAKER                                                    HOLDER




-----------------------                                  -----------------------
Rapidtron, Inc.,                                         Judith Creel
By: Peter Dermutz
CFO
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4142 

To amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to prohibit the approval 

of section 1115 waivers to provide coverage of childless adults under 

the State Children’s Health Insurance Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2004 

Mr. BURGESS (for himself, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. CARTER, Mr. AKIN, Mr. 

HENSARLING, and Mr. FEENEY) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to prohibit 

the approval of section 1115 waivers to provide coverage 

of childless adults under the State Children’s Health 

Insurance Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF SECTION 1115 WAIVERS FOR 

4 COVERAGE OF CHILDLESS ADULTS UNDER 

5 SCHIP. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2107 of the Social Secu7 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1397gg) is amended— 
2 

•HR 4142 IH 

1 (1) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘The following 

2 sections’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to subsection (f), 

3 the following sections’’; and 

4 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub5 section: 

6 ‘‘(f) LIMITATION ON COVERAGE OF CHILDLESS

7 ADULTS.—Under subsection (e)(2)(A), the Secretary may 

8 not approve a project under section 1115 that provides 

9 for coverage of nonpregnant childless adults with funds 

10 made available under this title.’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 subsection (a) shall apply to the approval of projects under 

13 section 1115 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1315) 

14 on or after March 23, 2004, and to the approval of any 

15 extension or expansion of a project under such section that 

16 was approved before such date. 

Æ 
2 

•HR 4142 IH 

1 (1) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘The following 

2 sections’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to subsection (f), 

3 the following sections’’; and 

4 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub5 section: 

6 ‘‘(f) LIMITATION ON COVERAGE OF CHILDLESS

7 ADULTS.—Under subsection (e)(2)(A), the Secretary may 

8 not approve a project under section 1115 that provides 

9 for coverage of nonpregnant childless adults with funds 

10 made available under this title.’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 subsection (a) shall apply to the approval of projects under 

13 section 1115 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1315) 

14 on or after March 23, 2004, and to the approval of any 

15 extension or expansion of a project under such section that 

16 was approved before such date. 

Æ
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                June 19, 2008 | /s/                Nicholas C. Taylor                              |
|-------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                | Chief                Executive Officer and President               |
|                                |                                                               |
| Dated:                June 19, 2008 | /s/                Tamala L. McComic                               |
|                                | Chief                Financial Officer, Vice President, Treasurer, |
|                                | and                Assistant Secretary                             |

----
EXHIBIT 12
  MERRILL
    LYNCH & CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND
    COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
    (dollars in millions)
  Year Ended Last Friday in December2008

2007

2006

2005

2004(52 weeks)

(52 weeks)

(52 weeks)

(52 weeks)

(53 weeks)Pre-tax earnings
    (loss)(a)

$
(45,438
)

$
(13,723
)

$
9,313


$
6,335


$
5,106Add: Fixed charges (excluding capitalized interest and preferred
    security dividend requirements of subsidiaries)


29,641



51,683



35,719



21,764



10,591Pre-tax earnings before fixed charges

$
(15,797
)

$
37,960


$
45,032


$
28,099


$
15,697Fixed charges:Interest

$
29,349


$
51,425


$
35,499


$
21,549


$
10,387Other(b)


292



258



220



215



204Total fixed charges

$
29,641


$
51,683


$
35,719


$
21,764


$
10,591Preferred stock dividend requirements


4,356



401



259



99



54Total combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends

$
33,997


$
52,084


$
35,978


$
21,863


$
10,645Ratio of earnings to fixed charges


*




*


1.26



1.29



1.48Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred
    stock dividends


*




*


1.25



1.29



1.47  (a)
    
    Excludes undistributed earnings
    (loss) from equity investments and earnings from discontinued
    operations.(b)
    
    Other fixed charges consist of
    the interest factor in rentals, amortization of debt issuance
    costs and preferred security dividend requirements of
    subsidiaries.*
    
    The earnings for the years
    ended 2008 and 2007 were inadequate to cover total fixed charges
    and total fixed charges and preferred stock dividends. The
    coverage deficiencies for total fixed charges for the years
    ended 2008 and 2007 were $45,438 and $13,723, respectively. The
    coverage deficiencies for total fixed charges and preferred
    stock dividends for the years ended 2008 and 2007 were $49,794
    and $14,124, respectively.
EXHIBIT 31.1
  CERTIFICATIONS
 
 I, Gregory F. Kowal, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.  The Company's other certifying officers and I, are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
 
 c)
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 5.  The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls; and
 
 6.  The Company's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 Date:  June 14, 2010
  /s/ Gregory F. KowalGregory F. KowalChief Executive Officer