alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          37,965
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             445
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                73,943
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    165,622
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         167,424
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           165,622
<LOANS>                                      1,175,458
<ALLOWANCE>                                     14,845
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,493,164
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,161,649
<SHORT-TERM>                                   102,643
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              9,806
<LONG-TERM>                                     78,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,446
<COMMON>                                        26,167
<OTHER-SE>                                     111,703
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,493,164
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 52,759
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,235
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,653
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                59,647
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              22,332
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,957
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           31,358
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      925
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  29
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 33,378
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,946
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      15,946
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,667
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.53
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,204
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                14,168
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      572
<RECOVERIES>                                       324
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               14,845
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>
#### Rosina Graley, plaintiff *vs.*James Graley, defendant.

"1. Where the defendant in an action for a divorce is imprisoned for the nonpayment of *alimony,*he can be relieved from imprisonment only under the provisions of the Revised Statutes relating to proceedings for contempts in civil actions, &c. (2 12. *S.*538, § 20.)

2. The defendant, on a motion for a discharge from imprisonment, and for a reduction of the amount of alimony, may be discharged on paying the amount due for alimony for which he was committed, and the amount accrued during his imprisonment. And the order for alimony may be at the same time reduced.

(Before Robertson, Ch. J.

at special term, September 10, 1866.)
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4336

To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit 

the operation of the Medicare comparative cost adjustment (CCA) program in the District of Columbia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2004

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 

Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act 

to prohibit the operation of the Medicare comparative 

cost adjustment (CCA) program in the District of Columbia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON OPERATION OF MEDICARE 

4 COMPARATIVE COST ADJUSTMENT (CCA) 

5 PROGRAM IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. 

6 Section 1860C–1(b)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 

7 U.S.C. 1395w–29(b)(2)), as added by section 241(a) of 
2

•HR 4336 IH 

1 the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Mod2 ernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108–173), is amended 

3 by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

4 ‘‘(C) NO PART IN THE DISTRICT OF CO5 LUMBIA.—No part of the MSA is in the Dis6 trict of Columbia.’’.

Æ
2

•HR 4336 IH 

1 the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Mod2 ernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108–173), is amended 

3 by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

4 ‘‘(C) NO PART IN THE DISTRICT OF CO5 LUMBIA.—No part of the MSA is in the Dis6 trict of Columbia.’’.

Æ
Internet of Things Advisory 

Board 

(Privacy Subgroup)

March 2023
Team Members

• Sub-team Members: Mike Bergman, Kevin Kornegay, Maria 

Rerecich, Debbie Reynolds

• Advisor: Barbara Cuthill

• Contractors: Brad Hoehn, Greg Witte

• Chair: Debbie Reynolds 
3

Opportunities

• Policy and / or Regulation should be considered in the US

• Privacy by Design throughout the IoT lifecycle

• Enable International data-sharing agreements

• Promote best practices for data collection and data sharing

• Education about the use of IoT devices (user or worker)

• Standardization of Privacy Policies

• Investigate the cybersecurity label program for privacy

• Incentives regarding liability protections for compliance

• Metrics to assess the risks of how the user interacts with IoT
3

Barriers to IoT Adoption

• Lack of transparency about IoT

• Lack of trust in IoT

• Lack of education about the use of IoT devices, including hazards (user or worker)

• Lack of understanding of the data being collected by IoT devices

• Lack of control or agency in data collection

• Reidentification of individuals from data sources

• Digital divide (not everyone has access to 5G, IoT, etc.)
3

Proposed Speakers for IoTAB Meetings

• Susan Landau is Professor in Cyber Security and Policy at The Fletcher School 

and the School of Engineering, Department of Computer Science, Tufts 

University
Questions?
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.8


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


         As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in this registration statement of our report dated
March 20, 1998, on the financial statements of Patterson Broadcasting, Inc. and
subsidiaries, included in or made part of Capstar Broadcasting Corporation's
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-48819), as amended on May 26,
1998, and to all references to our Firm included in this registration statement.


                                                  /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

                                                  ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Dallas, Texas
July 6, 1998
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

WHAM-O HOLDING, LTD. and 

INTERSPORT CORP. d/b/a WHAM-O,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”,

Defendants.

Civil Action No.: 1:20-cv-04202

Judge Thomas M. Durkin

Magistrate Judge Sheila M. Finnegan

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby files this Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal, without prejudice, as to the following Defendant(s) identified on Schedule A of the 

Complaint:

NO. DEFENDANT

96 Buy directly from China

101 Duction

DATED: November 2, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt (Bar No. 6207971)

Keith Vogt, Ltd.

111 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1700

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Telephone: 312-675-6079

E-mail: keith@vogtip.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case: 1:20-cv-04202 Document #: 37 Filed: 11/02/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:2562
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document was electronically filed on November 2, 2020 with the Clerk of the Court using the 

CM/ECF system, which will automatically send an email notification of such filing to all registered 

attorneys of record.

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt

Case: 1:20-cv-04202 Document #: 37 Filed: 11/02/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:2563
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 12.1


                         KEY PRODUCTION COMPANY, INC.
        Statement of Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges




                                                        Nine Months Ended
(In thousands, except ratio amounts)                      September 30,
                                                        -----------------
                                                          2000      1999
                                                        --------  -------
Earnings:

  Pretax income                                           28,521    5,021
  Plus: Fixed charges excluding capitalized interest       2,582    2,076
                                                        --------  -------
                                                          31,103    7,097
                                                        ========  =======

Fixed Charges:

  Interest expensed including capitalized interest         3,338    3,011
  Amortization of debt expenses                              283       13
                                                        --------  -------
                                                           3,621    3,024
                                                        ========  =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                          8.59     2.35
                                                        ========  =======
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Miller Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the period ending April 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Angelo
Napolitano, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:   October
      9, 2009/s/  Angelo
      NapolitanoAngelo
      Napolitano
                          Chief
      Executive Officer and
                          Chief
      Financial
Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Miller Industries, Inc. and will be
returned by Miller Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32(a)**CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) ofLindsay Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended May 31, 2007, I, Richard W.Parod, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, David B. Downing, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.       /s/ Richard W. Parod President and Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Fitzpatrick, Overton and Senior Judge Hodges Argued at Salem, Virginia

HARLAN L. WILSON MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 0161-95-3 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON JULY 2, 1996 COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF CHATHAM

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PITTSYLVANIA COUNTY B. A. Davis, III, Judge Barbara Hudson for appellant. Rudolph A. Shupik, Jr. for appellee.

The Virginia Employment Commission awarded benefits to Harlan L. Wilson upon the cessation of his employment with the Town of Chatham. The circuit court reversed the commission on the ground that Wilson voluntarily left his employment without good cause. We affirm the circuit court's decision. An individual is disqualified from unemployment benefits if he leaves work voluntarily and without good cause. Code § 60.2-618(1). Whether an employee voluntarily quit without good cause is a mixed question of law and fact and is reviewable on appeal. Virginia Employment Comm'n v. Fitzgerald , 19 Va. App. 491, 493, 452 S.E.2d 692, 693 (1995). The evidence before the circuit court demonstrated that Wilson left his employment voluntarily and without good cause. "The term 'voluntary' connotes '[u]nconstrained by interference;

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.- 2 - unimpelled by another's influence; spontaneous; acting of oneself . . . [r]esulting from free choice.' An employee's intention to quit may be discerned from words or conduct inconsistent with the maintenance of an employer/employee relationship." Shuler v. Virginia Employment Comm'n , 9 Va. App. 147, 150-51, 384 S.E.2d 122, 124 (1989) (citations omitted). On February 8, 1993, Wilson told the town council that he would be submitting his resignation that evening. He did in fact submit a letter stating that it was his resignation. Although the council did not formally accept the resignation at that time, Wilson cleaned out his locker at work within the next three days. At no time did he attempt to withdraw his resignation. We hold that the circuit court did not err when it found that this employee voluntarily quit his employment without good

cause. Affirmed.- 3 - Fitzpatrick, J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent. On appeal, "the findings of the [VEC] as to the facts, if supported by evidence and in the absence of fraud, shall be conclusive, and the jurisdiction of the court shall be confined to questions of law." Code § 60.2-625(A); Shifflett v. Virginia Employment Comm'n , 14 Va. App. 96, 97, 414 S.E.2d 865, 865 (1992). In the instant case, the evidence supported the commission's finding that Wilson was terminated, and the circuit court erred in overturning that factual determination.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          35,930
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  374,471
<ALLOWANCES>                                   215,743
<INVENTORY>                                     82,995
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               505,914
<PP&E>                                         453,360
<DEPRECIATION>                                 262,341
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,037,840
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          667,314
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    679,310
<COMMON>                                         3,642
<OTHER-SE>                                   (890,231)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,037,840
<SALES>                                        410,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               410,400
<CGS>                                          245,561
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  245,561
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               584,297
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,420
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (427,580)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (427,580)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>                                                           5 

        
<S>                                                       <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                  12-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         FEB-28-1988 
<PERIOD-START>                                            MAR-01-1987 
<PERIOD-END>                                              FEB-28-1988 
<CASH>                                                              0 
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    0 
<PP&E>                                                              0 
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                      0 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       1,000,828 
<BONDS>                                                             0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                                         0 
<COMMON>                                                       33,917
<OTHER-SE>                                                  1,141,299
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               (1,000,828) 
<SALES>                                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    0 
<CGS>                                                               0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                                        0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0 

         

</TABLE>
Improving Biometric and 

Forensic Technology:

The Future of Research Datasets

Mark Greene

Office of Science and Technology

National Institute of Justice

January 26, 2014
NIJ / NIST Collaborative Effort

• Origin of the effort—

To address perceived limitations of existing 

biometric data collections towards developing a 

new latent fingerprint research database to help 

the research community build the next 

generation of latent fingerprint algorithms.

What would the next-generation SD 27 

database look like?
NIJ / NIST Collaborative Effort

• Identify the concerns related to distributing 

biometric data collections and recommend how these 

issues could be mitigated.

• Perform a comprehensive survey of existing 

publicly-available biometric databases.

• Hold a stakeholder workshop to discuss the needs 

and requirements of next generation biometrics 

databases for public research use.

• Develop a roadmap identifying future biometric 

database collection needs and strategies.
Biometric and Forensic Research 

Database Catalog

https://tsapps.nist.gov/bdbc
Workshop Topics

• The Role of Research Datasets in Improving 

Biometric and Forensic Technology

• Challenges in the Collection and Use of Biometric 

and Forensic Datasets

• Privacy and Legal Issues in the Collection, 

Distribution, and Use of Biometric and Forensic 

Datasets

• NIST’s Biometric and Forensic Research Database 

Catalog Overview

• Statistical Significance in Biometric and Forensic 

Datasets
CYBERSECURITY FOR 

GENERATIVE AI 

Leveraging Existing Tools and 

Identifying New Challenges 

© BSA | THE SOFTWARE ALLIANCE 
BSA | The Software Alliance 
 

 

TRADITONAL AND 

GENERATIVE AI 

SYSTEMS 

• Hardware 

• Software 

• Impact 
SOFTWARE SECURITY 

The BSA Framework for Secure Software 

NIST Secure Software Development 

Framework 
IDENTIFYING 

NEW GAPS 

• Purpose 

• Adaptability 

• Data Dependency 

• Complexity 

• Autonomy 
 

 

 

NEXT STEPS 

• Reassert a risk management approach 

• Educate policymakers, business leaders, and software 

developers 

• Identify needs through public-private partnerships 

• Create additional guidance as needed 

• Standardize 
 

 

 

CYBERSECURITY FOR 

GENERATIVE AI 

Leveraging Existing Tools and 

Identifying New Challenges 

© BSA | THE SOFTWARE ALLIANCE