alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21

THE MIDLAND COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

December 31, 2006

The
subsidaries of the registrant as of December 31, 2006, all of which are included in the consolidated financial statements, are as follows:



|                                                        |  |                       |  |                              
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|                                                        |  | State ofIncorporation |  | Percentageof VotingStockOwned
|M/G Transport Services, Inc.                            |  | Ohio                  |  | 100                          
|Midland-Guardian Co.                                    |  | Ohio                  |  | 100                          
|MGT Services, Inc.                                      |  | Ohio                  |  | 100                          
|SUBSIDIARIES OF MIDLAND-GUARDIAN CO.:                   |  |                       |  |                              
|American Modern Insurance Group, Inc.                   |  | Ohio                  |  | 100                          
|SUBSIDIARIES OF AMERICAN MODERN INSURANCE GROUP, INC.:  |  |                       |  |                              
|American Modern Home Insurance Company                  |  | Ohio                  |  | 100                          
|American Family Home Insurance Company                  |  | Florida               |  | 100                          
|American Modern Life Insurance Company                  |  | Ohio                  |  | 100                          
|Lloyds Modern Corporation                               |  | Texas                 |  | 100                          
|American Modern Home Service Company                    |  | Ohio                  |  | 100                          
|Modern Services Group, Inc.                             |  | Ohio                  |  | 100                          
|American Modern Financial Services, Inc.                |  | Ohio                  |  | 100                          
|SUBSIDIARIES OF AMERICAN MODERN HOME INSURANCE COMPANY: |  |                       |  |                              
|American Modern Lloyds Insurance Company                |  | Texas                 |  | 100                          
|American Southern Home Insurance Company                |  | Florida               |  | 100                          
|American Western Home Insurance Company                 |  | Oklahoma              |  | 100                          
|American Modern Select Insurance Company                |  | Ohio                  |  | 100                          
|SUBSIDIARIES OF AMERICAN MODERN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY: |  |                       |  |                              
|SPL Holding Company, Inc.                               |  | Arkansas              |  | 100
#### GEORGE *v.*THE STATE.

No. 6871.

December 14, 1928.

*535
      *Branch & Howard*and *E. L. Tiller,*for plaintiff in error.

*George M. Napier, attorney-general, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, T. B. Gross, assistant attorney-general, J. W. LeCraw,*and *J. H. Hudson,*contra.

Hill, J.

The principal witness for the State was Albert Calhoun, who was jointly indicted with the plaintiff in error and was an accomplice in the commission of the crime alleged. Under our law pne can not be convicted of crime on the evidence of an accomplice, unless that evidence is corroborated. Penal Code (1910), § 1017. From the evidence set out in the statement of facts it will be seen that the evidence of Albert Calhoun was corroborated. The verdict was supported by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the- Justices concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
balance sheet of CNL Income Fund V, Ltd. at March 31, 2000, and its statement of
income for the three  months  then ended and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference to the Form 10-Q of CNL Income Fund V, Ltd. for the three months ended
March 31, 2000
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         1,875,426
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  244,856
<ALLOWANCES>                                   198,715
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         10,974,112
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,945,726
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 16,371,881
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     15,381,553
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   16,371,881
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               338,015
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  155,222
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               18,673
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                218,805
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            218,805
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   218,805
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Due  to the nature of its  industry,  CNL  Income  Fund V, Ltd.  has an
unclassified  balance  sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 408 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 408

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 14, 2003

                                Received

                            December 9, 2003

    Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To provide for expansion of Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF SLEEPING BEAR DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE.

    (a) In General.--When title to the land described in subsection (b) 
has vested in the United States in fee simple, the boundary of Sleeping 
Bear Dunes National Lakeshore is revised to include such land in that 
park.
    (b) Land Described.--The land referred to in subsection (a) 
consists of approximately 104.45 acres of unimproved lands generally 
depicted on National Park Service map number 634/80078, entitled 
``Bayberry Mills, Inc. Crystal River, MI Proposed Expansion Unit to 
Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore''. The Secretary of the Interior 
shall keep such map on file and available for public inspection in the 
appropriate offices of the National Park Service.
    (c) Purchase of Lands Authorized.--The Secretary of the Interior 
may acquire the land described in subsection (b), only by purchase from 
a willing seller.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ACQUISITION BY EXCHANGE OR CONVEYANCE.

    The Secretary of the Interior may not acquire any of the land 
described in subsection (b) of section 1 through any exchange or 
conveyance of lands that are within the boundary of the Sleeping Bear 
Dunes National Lakeshore as of the date of the enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 8, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### James H. Canniff v. Emily Canniff.

*Divorce*— Jurisdiction—Suit *by non-resident in municipal court.*

A non-resident of Detroit cannot file a bill for divorce in tbe Supe, rior Court of that city.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Detroit.

Submitted October 18.

Decided October 31.

Bill for divorce. Defendant appeals.

Reversed: bill dismissed.

*Ha/rry F. Ghvpman*and *JO. O. Holbrook*for complainant.

*Wilkinson, Post <& Wilkinson*and *Fdvñn F.Oondy*for defendant.

*479Marston, J.

*We*are not satisfied that the complainant has shown himself to be a resident of the city of Detroit at the time he filed his bill of complaint. It is true he testifies that he was, but his every act shows the contrary and outweighs his testimony as to his intentions upon this subject.

"We need not however discuss this matter at length, as we are of opinion that he has not made any case entitling him to the relief prayed for. Under the peculiar circumstances of this case, as appears by the testimony, we abstain from any discussion of the facts. To attempt to give our reasons at length for the conclusion arrived at, could be of no public benefit, and could serve no useful purpose.

The decree must be reversed and the bill be dismissed with costs of both courts, and the farther sum of five hundred dollars will be allowed complainant, for her support to this date, and for expenses and counsel fees in her defence.

The other Justices concurred
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      OF PERIODIC REPORT**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Alpha
      Nutraceuticals, Inc.(the “Company”), certifies that:




1.  The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September
      30, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







September
      20, 2006








By:
            /s/Mark
                L. Baum
              Mark
                L. Baum
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer





This
      certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
      to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
      purpose.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                     OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                     453
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            7,221
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         7,674
<PP&E>                                                  27,938
<DEPRECIATION>                                         (13,720)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         111,670
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  478,237
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                 2,735
<OTHER-SE>                                            (366,568)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           111,670
<SALES>                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             0
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           32,435
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         5,205
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       3,019
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (40,659)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (40,659)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               (0)



</TABLE>
Draft for Comment 

Crosswalk

An illustration of how NIST AI RMF trustworthiness characteristics

relate to the OECD Recommendation on AI, Proposed EU AI Act, Executive Order 13960, and Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights

NIST AI RMF OECD Recommendation on AIEU AI Act

(Proposed)

EO 13960:

Promoting the

Use of

Blueprint for an

AI Bill of Rights

Trustworthy AI

in the Federal

Government

Valid and Reliable Robustness - “AI Robustness; Accurate; reliable, Validity; 

- includes system lifecycle Validation; and effective; Accuracy; 

accuracy and phases involve Accuracy Purposeful and Reliability/reliable 

robustness verifcation and performance 

validation” driven 

Safe Safe; Safety Safety Safe Safe and effective 

Secure and Security Security; Secure and Secure 

Resilient Cybersecurity resilient 

Resilient 

Accountable and 

Transparent 

Transparency; 

Transparency and 

responsible 

disclosure; 

Transparency; 

Accountability 

Transparent; 

Accountable 

Accountability 

reporting; 

Transparency 

Accountability 

Explainable and 

Interpretable 

Explainability Explainable; 

Interpretability 

Understandable 

by subject matter 

Notice and 

explanation; 

experts, users, and Explainable; 

others, as 

appropriate 

Interpretable 

Privacy-Enhanced Privacy; Respect 

for human rights 

and privacy 

Privacypreserving 

measures 

Lawful and 

respectful of our 

Nation’s values 

“Ensure that the 

Privacy; Data 

privacy 

use of AI remains 

consistent with all 

applicable laws, 

including those 

related to privacy, 

civil rights, and 

civil liberties.” 

Continued on next page 

Page 1 
Draft for Comment 

NIST AI RMF OECD Recommendation on AIEU AI Act

(Proposed)

EO 13960:

Promoting the

Use of

Trustworthy AI

in the Federal

Government

Blueprint for an

AI Bill of Rights

Fair – with Human-centered Non- Lawful and Algorithmic 

Harmful Bias values and discrimination respectful of our discrimination 

Managed fairness Nation’s values; 

Responsible 

protections; 

Proactive 

assessment of 

equity in design 

Ensuring 

accessibility; 

Basic safeguards 

against abuse, 

bias, and 

discrimination to 

ensure all people 

are treated fairly 

Page 2
Gaithersburg, MD 20899 Stop National Institute of Standards and TechnologyU.S Department of Commerce

2600

MEDIA MAIL

POSTAGE AND FEES PAID

NIST

PERMIT No. 6086
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4210 

To amend the Farm Credit Act of 1971 to support the commercial fishing 

industry. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2004 

Mr. LOBIONDO (for himself and Mr. ALLEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Farm Credit Act of 1971 to support the 

commercial fishing industry. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CREDIT TO BUSINESSES PRO4 VIDING SERVICES TO PRODUCERS OR HAR5 VESTERS OF AQUATIC PRODUCTS. 

6 (a) FARM CREDIT BANKS.— 

7 (1) ELIGIBILITY FOR CREDIT AND FINANCIAL

8 SERVICES.—Section 1.9 of the Farm Credit Act of 

9 1971 (12 U.S.C. 2017) is amended— 
2 

•HR 4210 IH 

1 (A) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of para2 graph (2); 

3 (B) by striking the period at the end of 

4 paragraph (3) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

5 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(4) persons furnishing to producers or har7 vesters of aquatic products services directly related 

8 to their operating needs.’’. 

9 (2) PURPOSES FOR EXTENSIONS OF CREDIT.— 

10 Section 1.11(c)(1) of such Act (12 U.S.C. 

11 2019(c)(1)) is amended by inserting ‘‘and to persons 

12 furnishing services directly related to the operating 

13 needs of producers or harvesters of aquatic prod14 ucts’’ after ‘‘needs’’. 

15 (b) PRODUCTION CREDIT ASSOCIATIONS.—Section 

16 2.4(a) of such Act (12 U.S.C. 2075(a)) is amended— 

17 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph 

18 (2); 

19 (2) by striking the period at the end of para20 graph (3) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

21 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

22 ‘‘(4) persons furnishing to producers or harvesters of 

23 aquatic products services directly related to their oper24 ating needs.’’. 

Æ
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. JASON LEE JENNEN, Defendant - Appellant. No. 13-30016 D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00081-LRS
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Lonny R. Suko, District Judge, Presiding Submitted September 16, 2013 ** Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges. Jason Lee Jennen appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the nine-month custodial term and the 25-month term of supervised release imposed upon revocation of supervised re lease. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Jennen contends that the district cour t erred procedurally by (1) presuming 

# FILED
OCT 23 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).that a within-Guidelines sentence was reas onable; (2) failing to explain adequately why it rejected the sentencing recommendations of both parties in favor of the sentence selected; and (3) relying impr operly upon rehabilitation in selecting a sentence. We review for plain error, see United States v. Valencia-Barragan , 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 & n.3 (9th Cir. 2010), and find none. The record reflects that the district court did not presume the reasonableness of a within-Guidelines sentence and that it considered the arguments of both parties and ade quately explained its reasons for the sentence. See United States v. Carty , 520 F.3d 984, 992-93 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). Furthermore, the record reflects that the court considered Jennen’s need and desire fo r rehabilitation in the appropriate context of evaluating the need for a supervised release term, rather than in determining whether to impose a prison term or the length of that term. See United States v. Grant , 664 F.3d 276, 280, 282 (9th Cir. 2011). Jennen also argues that the overall se ntence is substantively unreasonable. We review for abuse of discretion, see Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007), and find none. The sentence imposed is substantively reasonable in light of the totality of the circumstances a nd the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) factors, including the need to deter and to protect the public . See id. AFFIRMED.

2
Exhibit 32.2  Certification  In connection with the annual report of Lotus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Zeng Yan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  March 30, 2010
        /s/ Zeng Yan
 Zeng Yan, Chief Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
HMM Reference NIST Technical Note 2205: Item 11 Ridge Vent

Item 11 Ridge Vent – Metal ridge vents prevent ember intrusion into house. 

Metal ridge vent

Note: Selected photographs are included to illustrate each HMM hardening item. Additional vulnerabilities or hardening items may be seen in the photographs, but those are highlighted within their specific HMM item.
There is no CAD drawing for 

Item 11: Ridge Vent 

Please see photographs for illustrations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EVEREST
FUTURES FUND, L.P. FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000837919
<NAME> EVEREST FUTURES FUND LP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      22,926,019
<SECURITIES>                                16,620,999
<RECEIVABLES>                                  219,976
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            39,766,994
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,766,994
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,045,677
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  38,721,318
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,766,993
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           (3,808,416)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  490,550
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,220,618)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,220,618)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,220,618)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (151.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (151.95)


</TABLE>