-

= =

Vendor F- VISIT_POE Left Index 

threshold 350 (far,tar) (0.0120981,0.989) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00433449 0.00733147 0.0123745 0.0228297 0.0573109 

TAR 0.997288 0.998379 0.99278 0.953642 0.856164 

Figure 1. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor F - Dataset VISIT_POE - Left Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor F- VISIT_POE Right Index 

threshold 350 (far,tar) (0.0119418,0.991333) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00372022 0.00826097 0.0131805 0.0216619 0.047653 

TAR 0.996681 0.993886 0.993461 0.94958 0.925926 

Figure 2. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor F - Dataset VISIT_POE - Right Index 
 

= =

Vendor F-VIST_POE_BVA - Left Index 

threshold 300 (far,tar) (0.0175153,0.991667) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00919626 0.0128571 0.018761 0.0320888 0.0660473 

TAR 0.998237 0.996568 0.995394 0.960452 0.894737 

Figure 3. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor F - Dataset VISIT_POE_BVA - Left Index 
 

-

threshold 300 (far,tar) (0.0170334,0.9965) = =

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00926579 0.0147207 0.0187485 0.0273401 0.0673513 

TAR 0.997478 0.997732 0.997213 1 0.949495 

Vendor F- VISIT_POE_BVA Right Index 

Figure 4. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor F - Dataset VISIT_POE_BVA - Right Index 
 

= =

Vendor F- BEN- Left Index 

threshold 300 (far,tar) (0.0151339,0.982833) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00440883 0.00702098 0.0100975 0.0286462 0.0731016 

TAR 0.999262 0.998914 0.995526 0.954802 0.770161 

Figure 5. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor F - Dataset BEN - Left Index 
 

= =

Vendor F- BEN- Right Index 

threshold 300 (far,tar) (0.0119847,0.992) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00443562 0.00739681 0.00974753 0.0214537 0.0673178 

TAR 0.999357 0.999049 0.997368 0.977444 0.833333 

Figure 6. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor F - Dataset BEN - Right Index 
 

= =

Vendor F- BEN- Left Thumb 

threshold 250 (far,tar) (0.0124658,0.995) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00573984 0.00591922 0.0103111 0.0264412 0.090925 

TAR 0.999193 0.999064 1 0.994505 0.803279 

Figure 7. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor F - Dataset BEN - Left Thumb 
 

= =

Vendor F- BEN- Right Thumb 

threshold 250 (far,tar) (0.00985267,0.9965) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00455931 0.00509298 0.007975 0.0223841 0.10937 

TAR 0.999581 0.999072 1 0.986395 0.809524 

Figure 8. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor F - Dataset BEN - Right Thumb 
 

-

= =

Vendor F- DHS10 Left Index 

threshold 300 (far,tar) (0.0165335,0.957833) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00325193 0.00664454 0.00994222 0.0179365 0.0620602 

TAR 0.997788 0.997959 0.987531 0.89243 0.729941 

Figure 9. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor F - Dataset DHS10- Left Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor F- DHS10 Right Index 

threshold 300 (far,tar) (0.0153657,0.957833) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00329983 0.0066985 0.0108052 0.0173443 0.0557976 

TAR 0.993711 0.993769 0.978673 0.913043 0.764826 

Figure 10. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor F - Dataset DHS10 - Right Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor F- DHS10 Left Thumb 

threshold 250 (far,tar) (0.0148204,0.984) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00380366 0.00680066 0.0112399 0.025831 0.0837408 

TAR 0.99919 0.995745 0.989206 0.967611 0.789474 

Figure 11. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor F - Dataset DHS10- Left Thumb 
 

-

threshold 250 (far,tar) = =(0.0129659,0.986333) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00351993 0.00628295 0.0104076 0.0222005 0.064331 

0.997002 0.99717 0.989813 0.963351 0.8125 

Vendor F- DHS10 Right Thumb 

TAR 

Figure 12. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor F - Dataset DHS10 - Right Thumb 
 

-

= =

Vendor F- TXDPS Left Index 

threshold 300 (far,tar) (0.0149825,0.976167) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00388928 0.0080183 0.0129326 0.0219414 0.0593495 

TAR 0.997409 0.998805 0.986806 0.938596 0.787736 

Figure 13. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor F - Dataset TXDPS - Left Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor F- TXDPS Right Index 

threshold 300 (far,tar) (0.0122197,0.981667) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00397337 0.00745201 0.0120205 0.0174724 0.0499757 

TAR 0.997666 0.996862 0.985871 0.957055 0.788043 

Figure 14. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor F - Dataset TXDPS - Right Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor F- TXDPS Left Thumb 

threshold 250 (far,tar) (0.0161859,0.979833) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00577851 0.0108511 0.0174483 0.0376002 0.144348 

TAR 0.99494 0.992723 0.972279 0.930556 0.686275 

Figure 15. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor F - Dataset TXDPS - Left Thumb 
 

-

= =

Vendor F- TXDPS Right Thumb 

threshold 250 (far,tar) (0.0125848,0.985667) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00479594 0.00953742 0.0137782 0.0318184 0.110626 

TAR 0.995729 0.993018 0.981622 0.848921 0.785714 

Figure 16. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor F - Dataset TXDPS - Right Thumb 
 

-

= =

Vendor F- DOS C- Left Index 

threshold 300 (far,tar) (0.0194669,0.9835) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0108932 0.0147872 0.0204099 0.0378907 0.066384 

TAR 0.996785 0.998897 0.982383 0.930769 0.811881 

Figure 17. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor F - Dataset DOS-C - Left Index 
 

-

= =

Vendor F- DOS C- Right Index 

threshold 300 (far,tar) (0.0170711,0.993833) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00955497 0.0150643 0.020633 0.0323783 0.0753982 

TAR 0.99852 0.999534 0.997245 0.971429 0.888889 

Figure 18. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor F - Dataset DOS-C - Right Index 
 

= =

Vendor F- DHS2-C- Left Index 

threshold 350 (far,tar) (0.010741,0.991168) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.00423005 0.0097039 0.0107745 0.0211165 0.0257114 

TAR 0.997965 0.994703 0.993355 1 0.952191 

Figure 19. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor F - Dataset DHS2-C - Left Index 
 

= =

Vendor F- DHS2-C- Right Index 

threshold 350 (far,tar) (0.012007,0.9893) 

Quality 1(excellent) 2(veryGood) 3(good) 4(fair) 5(poor) 

FAR 0.0042693 0.0102845 0.0115654 0.0218193 0.0309224 

TAR 1 0.993514 0.993289 1 0.958647 

Figure 20. The effect of quality on ROC - Vendor F - Dataset DHS2-C - Right Index