alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4417

To modify certain deadlines pertaining to machine-readable, tamper-resistant 

entry and exit documents. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2004

Mr. SENSENBRENNER (for himself, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. HYDE, Mr. LANTOS, 

Mr. COX, Mr. HOSTETTLER, and Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To modify certain deadlines pertaining to machine-readable, 

tamper-resistant entry and exit documents.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF CERTAIN DEADLINES FOR 

4 MACHINE-READABLE, TAMPER-RESISTANT 

5 ENTRY AND EXIT DOCUMENTS. 

6 Section 303 of the Enhanced Border Security and 

7 Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002 (8 U.S.C. 1732) is amend8 ed, in each of subsections (b)(2)(A), (c)(1), and (c)(2), by 

9 striking ‘‘2004,’’ and inserting ‘‘2005,’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFOMRATION  EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE-MONTH  PERIOD ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      2,092
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,418
<ALLOWANCES>                                444
<INVENTORY>                                 12,656
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,684
<PP&E>                                      15,471
<DEPRECIATION>                              5,069
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       29,808
<BONDS>                                     8,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       3,555
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    45
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,865
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                50,360
<SALES>                                     68,349
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            68,349
<CGS>                                       49,184
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               49,184
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,178
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            203
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          2,045
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             3,987
<INCOME-TAX>                                1,411
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         2,576
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                2,576
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.44
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.2
 
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We have
issued our report dated March 26, 2007, before the effects of the change in
accounting classification as described in Note 2, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of United Capital Corp. and
Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.  We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statements of United Capital Corp. on Form S-8 (Registration Nos.
33-28045, 33-65140, 333-28395, 333-57873 and 333-98645).
 
 
 
 /s/ Goldstein Golub Kessler
LLP
 GOLDSTEIN
GOLUB KESSLER LLP
 
 
 New York,
New York
 March 20,
2008
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 24, 2017

d0517

Order 

Clerk

May 24, 2017

154710

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 154710

COA: 326932

Wayne CC: 15-000361-FC

SHERRON DESHAWN DAVIS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 15, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the sentence of the Wayne Circuit Court, 

and we REMAND this case to the trial court for resentencing. As the prosecutor 

concedes, the trial court erred in scoring Offense Variable (OV) 13, MCL 777.43, at 25 

points, because the sentencing offense was not part of a pattern of felonious criminal 

activity involving three or more crimes against a person. The defendant did not commit 

three crimes against a person within a five-year period, and no points should have been 

scored. Because correcting the OV score would change the applicable guidelines range, 

resentencing is required. People v Francisco, 474 Mich 82 (2006). In all other respects, 

leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question 

presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

WILDER, J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-20961

Conference Calendar

 

WILLIAM COOPER; ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

WILLIAM COOPER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TOMMY THOMAS, Sheriff,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-03-CV-136

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

William Cooper, Texas prisoner # 1180768, appeals the

district court’s summary judgment in favor of Sheriff Tommy

Thomas of Harris County, dismissing Cooper’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983

complaint. Cooper argues that, contrary to the district court’s

determination, he was exposed to asbestos in the county jail. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 23, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 03-20961

-2-

Because Cooper sued only Sheriff Thomas and did not allege

that Sheriff Thomas was personally involved in his claims, Cooper

was required to show that Sheriff Thomas “implement[ed] a policy

so deficient that the policy itself is a repudiation of

constitutional rights and is the moving force of the

constitutional violation.” Thompkins v. Belt, 828 F.2d 298, 304

(5th Cir. 1987). As the district court determined, Cooper failed

to show that any policy implemented by the jail resulted in his

exposure to asbestos in violation of the Fourteenth or Eighth

Amendments. Although Cooper asserts that he was enrolled in an

upholstery-repair class during his incarceration at the jail and

that the class was conducted in the basement where high levels of

asbestos were found, he did not make this factual assertion in

the district court. He, thus, fails to demonstrate plain error. 

See Robertson v. Plano City of Texas, 70 F.3d 21, 23 (5th Cir.

1995). Cooper’s request for a medical examination and chest 

x-ray became moot upon his transfer to the state penitentiary. 

See Herman v. Holiday, 238 F.3d 660, 665 (5th Cir. 2001).

Cooper has waived his inadequate-medical-care claim by

failing to brief it on appeal. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d

222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993).

Based on the foregoing, the district court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our reports dated (i) February
10, 1997 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Commodore
Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries, (ii) February 3, 1997 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Southern Star Communications Inc., formerly
known as Osborn Communications Corporation, and (iii) March 5, 1998, except for
Notes 2 and 14 as to which the date is April 27, 1998, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Capstar Communications, Inc., formerly
known as SFX Broadcasting, Inc. and Subsidiaries, in the Registration Statement
on Form S-8 pertaining to Capstar Broadcasting Corporation Class A Common Stock
and interest in Capstar Broadcasting Partners 401(k) Retirement Plan and Trust.


                                                 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


New York, New York
August 31, 1998
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Desbuild, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 62902-ADR

)

Under Contract No. N40080-18-C-0032 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Douglas L. Patin, Esq. 

Sabah K. Petrov, Esq.

 Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

 Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

 Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Nicole R. Best, Esq.

Joshua S. Kauke, Esq.

 Trial Attorneys

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE CATES-HARMAN

The parties have resolved their dispute and request that the Board enter 

judgment in favor of appellant.

It is the Board’s decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the 

parties’ stipulation and agreement, that the appeal is sustained. In the nature of a 

consent judgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of

$1,350,000. This amount is inclusive of Contract Disputes Act interest. No further 

interest shall be paid. 

Dated: July 20, 2023

(Signature continued)

STEPHANIE CATES-HARMAN

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals
2

I concur

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD

Administrative Judge

Acting Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I concur

OWEN C. WILSON

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62902-ADR, Appeal of 

Desbuild, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: July 24, 2023

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
ULRICK WATSON , Appellant,

v. STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2571

_________ ____________________/ Opinion filed December 16, 2016. An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Russell L. Healey , Judge

. Ulrick Watson, pro se , Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Charlie Lee, Assistant Attorney Gen eral, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.
The A ppellant challenges the summary denial of his motion for post

conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 . We affirm the denial of ground one. In ground two , A ppellant allege s a claim of
ineffective assistance of appellate counsel and a claim of ineffective assistance of
trial counsel. The trial court properly denied the claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel as that claim is not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion. See Fla. R. **CORRECTED PAGES: pg 1 CORRECTION IS**  **UNDERLINED IN RED**  **MAILED: December 22, 2016 BY:**  **KMS**2 App. P. 9.141 ( d )( 3 ) (“Petitions seeking belated appeal or alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel shall be filed in the appellate court to which the appeal was or should have been taken”)

. However, A ppellant also allege s t hat trial
counsel was ineffectiv e for failing to call witnesses and that trial counsel was the
reason he lost at trial. This specific claim was never addressed by the trial court.
Thus , we reverse and remand for the trial court to address the ineffective assistance
of trial counsel claim. See Gonzalez v. State , 829 So. 2d 323 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (affirming denial of post

- conviction in part, but reversing and remanding for trial court to rule on issue not addressed in order). AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED a nd REMANDED in part, with directions. WOLF, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 10.14

# SCHEDULE OF OFFICERSSUPPLEMENTAL
EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT AGREEMENT

The
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement entered into by officers of Mestek, Inc. and
the Company are identical in all respects, except for the name of the officer and the date
of execution.

Set
forth below is the identity of each officer of Mestek, Inc. and the date upon which the
above Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement was executed by such offices.

|Director and/or Officer | Year of Execution
|----------------------- | -----------------
|
|
|R. Bruce Dewey          | 1997             
|William S. Rafferty     | 1997             
|Stephen M. Shea         | 1997             
|J. Nicholas Filler      | 2002             
|John Kaddaras           | 1997             
|James A. Burk           | 1997             
|Richard L. Riggs        | 2001             
|Lawrence Desmarais      | 2001
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


   
We consent to the use in this Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No.
333-64399 on Form S-4 of Regal Cinemas, Inc. of our report on the financial
statements of Act III Cinemas, Inc. dated March 25, 1998, appearing in the
Prospectus, which is part of such Registration Statement, and to the reference
to us under the heading "Experts" in such Prospectus.
    



                                        /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

   
Portland, Oregon
October 13, 1998
----

| Beltway      Assets LLC              | Delaware  |
|--------------------------------------|-----------|
| FireRock      LLC                    | Delaware  |
| Lakepointe      Assets LLC           | Delaware  |
| MAXXAM      Property Company         | Delaware  |
| MCO      Properties LP               | Delaware  |
| MCO      Properties, Inc.            | Delaware  |
| M-Six      Penvest II Business Trust | Delaware  |
| M-Six      Penvest II Business Trust | Louisiana |
| Palmas      Country Club, Inc.       | Delaware  |
| Palmas      del Mar Properties, Inc. | Delaware  |
|                                 |      |
| RACING OPERATIONS:                   |      |
|                                 |      |
| Sam      Houston Race Park, Ltd.     | Texas     |
| Valley      Race Park, Inc.          | Texas     |
|                                 |      |
| OTHER:                               |      |
|                                 |      |
| MAXXAM      Group Holdings Inc.      | Delaware  |

----

----
#### R. F. A. Grigsby *v.*Ann M. Grigsby, Adm’x.

Wills — Construction.

A construction of a will which harmonizes with the language used hy the testatrix, and which has the effect of carrying out her conceptions of justice and equity among her children, will be upheld.

Wills — Probate—Pleading.

An allegation that the will was duly proven and admitted to record in the clerk’s office of the county clerk, sufficiently alleges the probate of the will.

Appeal from Montgomery circuit court.

January 11, 1873.

*Apperson, for appellant.*

*Turner & Reid, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

It is manifest that Mrs. Grigsby intended to dispose of her entire estate, ánd that after the payment of debts, funeral expenses, and the specific devise to Mrs. Hinton, she intended the remainder to go to the five children named in the will. The mere fact that she used the term “money” is not enough to defeat this evident intention.

She seems to have contemplated that her estate should first be converted into money (for she devises nothing in kind), the debts, expenses, and specific devises paid, and then the remainder of such “money” divided as directed. This construction harmonizes with the language used by her, and will have the effect of carrying out her “conceptions of justice and equality among 'her’ several chi-dren.” The court below therefore properly adopted it. The objection that the petition does not sufficiently allege the probate of the will is not well taken. It is distinctly alleged that the will was duly proven, and admitted to record in the clerk’s office of the Clark County Court. The rules of pleading do not require that this statement of facts shall be so punctuated as to make it appear that the will was proven in the clerk’s office, as well as admitted to record therein. Besides this, appellant by his amended answer of June 21, 1871, in effect admits that some portions of his mother’s estate passed by her will, which could not have been the case unless it had been properly probated.

Judgment *affirmed.*
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63

Of Title 18 of the United States Code



I, Ralph F. Hake, the Chief Executive Officer of Maytag Corporation, certify that (i) the Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the foregoing report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Maytag Corporation.



/s/ Ralph F. HakeRalph F. Hake, Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 20, 2004Date
EXHIBIT 32.1

Walter Energy, Inc.  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Walter Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 (the "Report"), I, Joseph B. Leonard, interim Chief Executive Officer, Director and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date: May 7, 2010/s/ JOSEPH B. LEONARD interim Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended April 30, 2007 (the Form 10-QSB/A) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                   |     |                        
|------------------ | --- | -----------------------
|                   |     |                        
|Date March 3, 2008 | By: | /s/ Gregory F. Kowal   
|                   |     | Gregory F. Kowal       
|                   |     | Chief Executive Officer
|                   |     |                        



|                   |     |                                           
|------------------ | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                   |     |                                           
|Date March 3, 2008 | By: | /s/ Anthony E. Applebaum                  
|                   |     | Anthony E. Applebaum                      
|                   |     | Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
|                   |     |                                           



(ii) A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71785-71786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28434]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in or To Acquire Companies Engaged 
in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than December 15, 2014.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Gerald C. Tsai, Director, 
Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105-1579:
    1. First Financial Northwest, Inc. (``FFNW''), to engage de novo 
though its subsidiary, First Financial Diversified Corporation, both of 
Renton, Washington, in extending, acquiring,

[[Page 71786]]

brokering, or servicing of loans, and for acting as trustee on the 
deeds of trust of FFNW's subsidiary savings bank, First Savings Bank 
Northwest, Renton, Washington, pursuant to sections 225.28(b)(1) and 
225.28(b)(2)(viii).

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 28, 
2014.
Margaret McCloskey Shanks,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-28434 Filed 12-2-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 233 (Thursday, December 4, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 72061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28483]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board


Release of Waybill Data

    The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from 
BTGPactual (WB980-1--12/1/14) for permission to use certain data from 
the Board's 2013 Carload Waybill Sample. A copy of this request may be 
obtained from the Office of Economics.
    The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; 
therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file 
their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics 
within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for 
release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.
    Contact: Alexander Dusenberry, (202) 245-0319.

Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2014-28483 Filed 12-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P O Galley End:?>