alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 10.42**

**UNIVERSITY SCIENCECENTER**

**LEASE AGREEMENT**

This Lease ismade by and between University Research Park, Incorporated, a Wisconsinnon-stock corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Landlord"), and MentorCorporation, a Minnesota corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Tenant"), asof the date of execution by Landlord as set forth on the signature pagehereof.

W I T N E S S E T H :

IT IS HEREBY AGREED, by andbetween the parties hereto, in consideration of the covenants and agreements setforth in this Lease, as follows:

**1.  PREMISES AND TERM**

**1.1.      Leased Premises.** Landlord hereby leases to Tenant and Tenant hereby leases from Landlord on theterms and provisions and subject to the conditions hereinafter set forth in thisLease, the following described premises:

Space in abuilding located at 535 Science Drive, Suites A, B, C and D, Madison, DaneCounty, Wisconsin, (herein referred to as the "Leased Premises") consisting ofapproximately 9,500 leasable square feet of space and all necessary common areassituated upon the property described in Exhibit A attached hereto. (The Propertydescribed in Exhibit A is referred to herein as the "Landlord's Property"). Thelocation of the Leased Premises on the Landlord's Property is indicated on themap attached hereto as Exhibit B-1, and the floor plan attached hereto asExhibit B-2. 

**1.2.       Term ofLease**.  The term of this Lease ("the term") shall begin on May 1,2004 ("the commencement date"). The term shall end at midnight ten (10) yearslater.

**1.3.       SecurityDeposit**.  Tenant shall pay to Landlord upon execution of this Leasethe sum of Fourteen Thousand Two Hundred Fifty and no/100 Dollars ($14,250.00)as security for the performance of the obligations hereof by Tenant.  Thissum shall be returned to Tenant within thirty (30) days following thetermination of this Lease, provided Tenant has fulfilled all of its obligationsherein.

**1.4.       Condition ofPremises.**  Landlord shall deliver the Leased Premises in "As-Is"condition, except that Landlord reserves the right to remove equipment andfixtures and improvements required to relocate the current tenant.

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      06/13/05

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-41043) of Abacus Direct Corporation of our report
dated January 26, 1998 appearing on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
Boulder, Colorado
March 31, 1998
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4345 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 4345

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 24, 2004

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the maximum amount 
of home loan guaranty available under the home loan guaranty program of 
      the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN, AND ANNUAL INDEXING OF, MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF HOME 
              LOAN GUARANTY FOR CONSTRUCTION AND PURCHASE OF HOMES.

    (a) Maximum Loan Guaranty Based on 100 Percent of the Freddie Mac 
Conforming Loan Rate.--Section 3703(a)(1) is amended by striking 
``$60,000'' each place it appears in subparagraphs (A)(i)(IV) and (B) 
and inserting ``the maximum guaranty amount (as defined in subparagraph 
(C))''.
    (b) Definition.--Such section is further amended by adding at the 
end the following new subparagraph:
    ``(C) In this paragraph, the term `maximum guaranty amount' means 
the dollar amount that is equal to 25 percent of the Freddie Mac 
conforming loan limit limitation determined under section 305(a)(2) of 
the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Act (12 U.S.C. 1454(a)(2)) 
for a single-family residence, as adjusted for the year involved.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 23, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4363

To facilitate self-help housing homeownership opportunities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 13, 2004

Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin (for himself, Mr. FORD, Mr. NEY, Mr. KENNEDY

of Minnesota, and Mr. LUCAS of Kentucky) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL

To facilitate self-help housing homeownership opportunities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Helping Hands for 

5 Homeownership Act of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ASSISTANCE FOR SELF-HELP HOUSING PROVIDERS. 

7 Paragraph (1) of section 11(b) of the Housing Op8 portunity Program Extension Act of 1996 (42 U.S.C. 

9 12805 note) is amended by striking ‘‘dwelling’’ and insert10 ing ‘‘dwellings’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          28,642
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  495,284
<ALLOWANCES>                                    22,305
<INVENTORY>                                    383,753
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               968,862
<PP&E>                                       1,954,263
<DEPRECIATION>                                 988,669
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,587,663
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          790,697
<BONDS>                                        446,505
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       146,438
<OTHER-SE>                                     361,126
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,587,663
<SALES>                                      4,069,290
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,069,290
<CGS>                                        2,887,663
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,887,663
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                14,807
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              62,765
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                470,885
<INCOME-TAX>                                   176,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            294,785
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (5,900)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   280,610
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.99
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                        24863144
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 42743228
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    2005919
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              73375376
<PP&E>                                       996358220
<DEPRECIATION>                               301173988
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               778906729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         29221766
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          3214130
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   492205607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 778906729
<SALES>                                       86572042
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              87899646
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              21122481
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              130807
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               42042546
<INCOME-TAX>                                  16817000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           25225546
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  25225546
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.71
        

</TABLE>
9739.

#### Liberty Lumber Company *v.*Enecks.

Bboyees, P. J.

1. In an ordinary claim ease the claimant is entitled to a verdict in his favor if he shows title in himself, and the question whether he is liable to pay the debt on which the execution is founded is not properly triable in the ease. The question is not as to the claimant’s liability for the debt, but as to his title to the property levied on. By filing his claim he asserts merely that the property is not subject to sale under the execution. In such a case, in the absence of a suitable amendment or of proper equitable pleas, the plaintiff in fi. fa. can not introduce evidence which tends to show merely that in good conscience and equity the claimant is liable for the debt. Civil Code, 5407-8-9-12; *Gormerly*v. *Chapman,*51 *Ga.*421; *Hamberger*v. Easter, 57 *Ga.*72; *312
      *Ford*v. *Holloway,*112 *Ga.*851 (38 S. E. 373); *Southern Mining Co.*v. *Brown,*107 *Ga.*264, 269 (33 S. E. 73).

Decided January 23, 1919.

Levy and claim; from Screven superior court—Judge Hardeman. March 21, 1918.

*M. R. Lufburrow,*for plaintiff in error.

2. Under the foregoing ruling, the court erred, in admitting, over the claimant’s timely and appropriate objections, the evidence set forth in the first special ground of the motion for a new trial;

*Judgment reversed.*

*Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.*
#### S. S. Hite *v.*Fred Hoethide, etc.

Judicial Sales — Confirmation—Relief of Purchaser.

Where a purchaser of land at a judicial sale made no objection to the order of confirmance until nearly a year thereafter, and in response to a rule fails to suggest the specific defects which render his. title imperfect, he occupies the position of one seeking to rescind an executed contract; and he should disclose the facts en-entitling him to relief.

APPEAL FROM LOUISVILLE' CHANCERY COURT.

March 27, 1873.

Opinion by Judge

Lindsay :

There is no connection between this and the case of *Hite v. Reeve,*except that they relate to the same property. The equities of Mrs. *591Renter and her two infant children in said property are fully described in the pleadings in the case of *Hoethide v. Renter.*Hill must be regarded as having notice of the contents of these pleadings, at the time he permitted the sale to him to be confirmed, and the conveyance to be executed and certified for record.

*J. B. Cochrm, for appellant.*

*Muir & Bigers, for appellees.*

He made no objection to either of these orders until June 23, 1871, nearly a year after the order of confirmation. In his response to the rule, he fails to suggest the specific defects which render his title imperfect. He occupies the position of a party seeking to rescind an executed contract. His response to the rule should have disclosed facts entitling him to such relief. It fails to show any facts whatever, except that “he is not satisfied that he has a good title to the property sold herein, and his vendors are insolvent” and that he had sold the property to Reeve, who preferred to pay for it.

This response was properly overruled.

Judgment *affirmed.*
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 428

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the credit for 

increasing research activities permanent. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2003

Mr. SENSENBRENNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

the credit for increasing research activities permanent.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RESEARCH CREDIT MADE PERMANENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 41 of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 (relating to credit for increasing re6 search activities) is amended by striking subsection (h). 

7 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (1) of 

8 section 45C(b) of such Code is amended by striking sub9 paragraph (D). 
2

•HR 428 IH 

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after 

3 June 30, 2004.

Æ
<PAGE>   1
                                                               EXHIBIT 23.4


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

   
          We consent to the inclusion in this registration statement on Form S-1
(File No. 333-48819, Amendment No. 2) of our report dated February 8, 1997, on
our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Benchmark Communications
Radio Limited Partnership. We also consent to the reference to our firm under
the caption "Experts".
    


                                            COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

   
Dallas, Texas
May 8, 1998
No. 15,109.

#### Parsons *v.*Pierson et al.

Filed June 16, 1891.

*Judgment.*— Justice *of the Peace.*— Irregularities.—Relief.—Injunction.—Appeal. — Injunction will not lie to restrain the collection of a judgment rendered by a justice of the peace because of irregularities occurring at the trial. The remedy is by appeal.

From the Floyd Circuit Co'urt.

C. *D. Kelso*and *J. V. Kelso,*for appellant.

Elliott, J.

The appellant alleges in his complaint that the appellee Pierson brought an action against him, before a justice of the peace ; that the parties appeared; that upon the appellant’s request a jury was called ; that the evidence was heard; that the foreman of the jury orally announced a finding against the appellant; that no written verdict was returned ; that the justice entered judgment for the suni named by the foreman of the jury. Prayer for an injunction restraining the collection of the judgment.

The appellant had an adequate legal remedy, and can not have relief by injunction. His remedy was by appeal.

Judgment affirmed.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4458

To require the repayment of appropriated funds that are illegally disbursed 

for political purposes by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2004

Mr. PALLONE (for himself, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. DINGELL, Mr. 

WAXMAN, Mr. STARK, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. MATSUI, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, 

Mr. SANDLIN, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. BERRY, Mr. 

DOGGETT, Mr. DAVIS of Florida, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. STUPAK, 

Ms. SOLIS, Mr. STRICKLAND, Mr. RUSH, Ms. MCCARTHY of Missouri, 

Mr. WYNN, Mrs. CAPPS, and Mr. GREEN of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means and Energy 

and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To require the repayment of appropriated funds that are 

illegally disbursed for political purposes by the Centers 

for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Trust Fund 

5 Reimbursement Act of 2004’’. 
2

•HR 4458 IH 

1 SEC. 2. REPAYMENT TO THE MEDICARE TRUST FUNDS OF 

2 AMOUNTS ILLEGALLY DISBURSED FOR PO3 LITICAL PURPOSES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, if the Comptroller General of the United 

6 States determines that the Centers for Medicare & Med7 icaid Services has violated the restriction on using appro8 priated funds for publicity or propaganda purposes con9 tained in section 626 of division J of the Consolidated Ap10 propriations Resolution, 2003 (Public Law 108–7; 117 

11 Stat. 470) or any other provision of law, the principal 

12 campaign committee (as defined in section 301(5) of the 

13 Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 

14 431(5))) of the President of the United States shall reim15 burse the Federal Government for the amount used in 

16 committing such violation. 

17 (b) REIMBURSEMENT OF MEDICARE TRUST

18 FUNDS.—To the extent that the amount described in sub19 section (a) was initially appropriated to the Federal Hos20 pital Insurance Trust Fund under section 1817 of the So21 cial Security Act or the Federal Supplementary Medical 

22 Insurance Trust Fund under section 1841 of such Act, 

23 the amount reimbursed under such subsection shall be 

24 credited to the Trust Fund to which the amount was ini25 tially appropriated.

Æ
EXHIBIT 3.1
-----------

                          SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                  GENUS, INC.

                                       I.

     The name of this corporation is:   GENUS, INC.

                                       II.

     The purpose of this corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity
for which a corporation may be organized under the General Corporation Law of
California other than the banking business, the trust company business or the
practice of a profession permitted to be incorporated by the California
Corporations Code.

                                      III.

     This Corporation is authorized to issue two classes of shares, designated
"Common Stock" and "Preferred Stock."  The total number of shares which this
corporation is authorized to issue is 102,000,000.  The number of shares of
Preferred Stock which this corporation is authorized to issue is 2,000,000.  The
number of shares of Common Stock which this corporation is authorized to issue
is 100,000,000.

     The Preferred Stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series.
The Board of Directors of this corporation is authorized to determine or alter
the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions granted to or imposed upon
any wholly unissued series of Preferred Stock, and within the limitations or
restrictions stated in any resolution or resolutions of the Board of Directors
originally fixing the number of shares constituting any series, to increase or
decrease (but not below the number of shares of any such series then
outstanding) the number of shares of any such series subsequent to the issue of
shares of that series, to determine the designation and par value of any series
and to fix the number of shares of any series.

                                       IV.

     The liability of the directors of this corporation for monetary damages
shall be eliminated to the fullest extent permissible under California law.

     The corporation is authorized to provide indemnification of agents (as
defined in Section 317 of the California Corporations Code) through bylaw
provisions, agreements with agents, vote of shareholders or disinterested
directors or otherwise, in excess of the indemnification otherwise permitted by
Section 317 of the California Corporations Code, subject only to the applicable
limits set forth in Section 204 of the California Corporations Code with respect
to actions for breach of duty to the corporation and its shareholders.

     Any repeal or modification of the foregoing provisions of this Article IV
by the shareholders of this corporation shall not adversely affect any right or
protection of a director of this corporation existing at the time of such repeal
or modification.


                                       34
<PAGE>
Map created by NIST. Updated Jan. 26, 2021.

Roads ...................... U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2019

Water ....................... U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2019

Places ...................... U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2019

Counties .................. U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2019

Elevation .............................................................. U.S. Geological Survey

IR Fire Perimeters .............................. National Interagency Fire Center

Landsat Perimeter ..................................... NASA Imagery, NIST Overlay

Data Points, Vectors, Annotations ................................................... NIST

NAD83, CA State Plane Zone 2

Lambert Conformal Conic Projection

N

November 8, 2018 — 13:00 to 14:00

Fire Observations

Final Camp Fire perimeter

Spot fire

Vegetation fire

Residential structure fire

Commercial structure fire

General fire

(Faded symbols indicate previous observation)

Documented burnover event

Generalized fire spread vector

Legend

Overview

This map/data was created and assembled by the National Institute of Standards and Technology

(NIST) from various GIS data sources and is intended for illustrative purposes only. NIST makes no

warranty, expressed or implied, related to the accuracy or content of these materials and map/data.

Map 9 of 14. Full report available from https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.TN.2135
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4190 

To require the Secretary of Labor to declare that operating power driven 

amusement park rides is a hazardous occupation for the purposes of 

certain child labor provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2004 

Mr. MARKEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Labor to declare that operating 

power driven amusement park rides is a hazardous occupation for the purposes of certain child labor provisions 

of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Amusement Park Ride 

5 Child Labor Act of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DECLARATION OF HAZARDOUS OCCUPATION. 

7 For the purposes of section 3(l) of the Fair Labor 

8 Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 203(l)), the Secretary 
2 

•HR 4190 IH 

1 of Labor is directed to find, and by order declare, that 

2 operating power driven amusement park rides is particu3 larly hazardous for children between the ages of 16 and 

4 18. 

Æ