70850 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 229 / Friday, November 28, 2014 / Notices 

1See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; 

Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 

39263 (July 6, 2011). 

controlled by the Denied Person if such 

service involves the use of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States. For purposes of this paragraph, 

servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification or 

testing. 

Third, after notice and opportunity for 

comment as provided in Section 766.23 

of the Regulations, any other person, 

firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to Steinberg by 

ownership, control, position of 

responsibility, affiliation, or other 

connection in the conduct of trade or 

business may also be made subject to 

the provisions of this Order in order to 

prevent evasion of this Order. 

Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of 

the Regulations, Steinberg may file an 

appeal of this Order with the Under 

Secretary of Commerce for Industry and 

Security. The appeal must be filed 

within 45 days from the date of this 

Order and must comply with the 

provisions of Part 756 of the 

Regulations. 

Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be 

delivered to the Steinberg. This Order 

shall be published in the Federal 

Register. 

Sixth, this Order is effective 

immediately and shall remain in effect 

until February 25, 2016. 

Issued this 20th day of November, 2014. 

Karen H. Nies-Vogel, 

Director, Office of Exporter Services. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28068 Filed 11–26–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘the Department’’) has received 

requests to conduct administrative 

reviews of various antidumping and 

countervailing duty orders and findings 

with October anniversary dates. In 

accordance with the Department’s 

regulations, we are initiating those 

administrative reviews. 

DATES: Effective November 28, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD 

Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 

482–4735. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department has received timely 

requests, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b), for administrative reviews of 

various antidumping and countervailing 

duty orders and findings with October 

anniversary dates. 

All deadlines for the submission of 

various types of information, 

certifications, or comments or actions by 

the Department discussed below refer to 

the number of calendar days from the 

applicable starting time. 

Notice of No Sales 

If a producer or exporter named in 

this notice of initiation had no exports, 

sales, or entries during the period of 

review (‘‘POR’’), it must notify the 

Department within 60 days of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. All submissions must be filed 

electronically at http://

iaaccess.trade.gov in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.303.1 Such submissions are 

subject to verification in accordance 

with section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (‘‘Act’’). Further, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(1)(i), 

a copy must be served on every party on 

the Department’s service list. 

Respondent Selection 

In the event the Department limits the 

number of respondents for individual 

examination for administrative reviews, 

the Department intends to select 

respondents based on U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S. 

imports during the POR. We intend to 

release the CBP data under 

Administrative Protective Order 

(‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an APO 

within seven days of publication of this 

initiation notice and to make our 

decision regarding respondent selection 

within 21 days of publication of this 

Federal Register notice. The 

Department invites comments regarding 

the CBP data and respondent selection 

within five days of placement of the 

CBP data on the record of the applicable 

review. Rebuttal comments will be due 

five days after submission of initial 

comments. 

In the event the Department decides 

it is necessary to limit individual 

examination of respondents and 

conduct respondent selection under 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: 

In general, the Department has found 

that determinations concerning whether 

particular companies should be 

‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single 

entity for purposes of calculating 

antidumping duty rates) require a 

substantial amount of detailed 

information and analysis, which often 

require follow-up questions and 

analysis. Accordingly, the Department 

will not conduct collapsing analyses at 

the respondent selection phase of this 

review and will not collapse companies 

at the respondent selection phase unless 

there has been a determination to 

collapse certain companies in a 

previous segment of this antidumping 

proceeding (i.e., investigation, 

administrative review, new shipper 

review or changed circumstances 

review). For any company subject to this 

review, if the Department determined, 

or continued to treat, that company as 

collapsed with others, the Department 

will assume that such companies 

continue to operate in the same manner 

and will collapse them for respondent 

selection purposes. Otherwise, the 

Department will not collapse companies 

for purposes of respondent selection. 

Parties are requested to (a) identify 

which companies subject to review 

previously were collapsed, and (b) 

provide a citation to the proceeding in 

which they were collapsed. Further, if 

companies are requested to complete 

the Quantity and Value (‘‘Q&V’’) 

Questionnaire for purposes of 

respondent selection, in general each 

company must report volume and value 

data separately for itself. Parties should 

not include data for any other party, 

even if they believe they should be 

treated as a single entity with that other 

party. If a company was collapsed with 

another company or companies in the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding where the Department 

considered collapsing that entity, 

complete Q&V data for that collapsed 

entity must be submitted. 

Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for 

Administrative Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a 

party that has requested a review may 

withdraw that request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. The 

regulation provides that the Department 

may extend this time if it is reasonable 

to do so. In order to provide parties 

additional certainty with respect to 

when the Department will exercise its 

discretion to extend this 90-day 

deadline, interested parties are advised 

that the Department does not intend to 

extend the 90-day deadline unless the 

requestor demonstrates that an 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 229 / Friday, November 28, 2014 / Notices 70851 

2Such entities include entities that have not 

participated in the proceeding, entities that were 

preliminarily granted a separate rate in any 

currently incomplete segment of the proceeding 

(e.g., an ongoing administrative review, new 

shipper review, etc.) and entities that lost their 

separate rate in the most recently completed 

segment of the proceeding in which they 

participated. 

3Only changes to the official company name, 

rather than trade names, need to be addressed via 

a Separate Rate Application. Information regarding 

new trade names may be submitted via a Separate 

Rate Certification. 

extraordinary circumstance has 

prevented it from submitting a timely 

withdrawal request. Determinations by 

the Department to extend the 90-day 

deadline will be made on a case-by-case 

basis. 

Separate Rates 

In proceedings involving non-market 

economy (‘‘NME’’) countries, the 

Department begins with a rebuttable 

presumption that all companies within 

the country are subject to government 

control and, thus, should be assigned a 

single antidumping duty deposit rate. It 

is the Department’s policy to assign all 

exporters of merchandise subject to an 

administrative review in an NME 

country this single rate unless an 

exporter can demonstrate that it is 

sufficiently independent so as to be 

entitled to a separate rate. 

To establish whether a firm is 

sufficiently independent from 

government control of its export 

activities to be entitled to a separate 

rate, the Department analyzes each 

entity exporting the subject 

merchandise under a test arising from 

the Final Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value: Sparklers from the 

People’s Republic of China, 56 FR 20588 

(May 6, 1991), as amplified by Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value: Silicon Carbide from the 

People’s Republic of China, 59 FR 22585 

(May 2, 1994). In accordance with the 

separate rates criteria, the Department 

assigns separate rates to companies in 

NME cases only if respondents can 

demonstrate the absence of both de jure 

and de facto government control over 

export activities. 

All firms listed below that wish to 

qualify for separate rate status in the 

administrative reviews involving NME 

countries must complete, as 

appropriate, either a separate rate 

application or certification, as described 

below. For these administrative reviews, 

in order to demonstrate separate rate 

eligibility, the Department requires 

entities for whom a review was 

requested, that were assigned a separate 

rate in the most recent segment of this 

proceeding in which they participated, 

to certify that they continue to meet the 

criteria for obtaining a separate rate. The 

Separate Rate Certification form will be 

available on the Department’s Web site 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/nme/

nme-sep-rate.html on the date of 

publication of this Federal Register 

notice. In responding to the 

certification, please follow the 

‘‘Instructions for Filing the 

Certification’’ in the Separate Rate 

Certification. Separate Rate 

Certifications are due to the Department 

no later than 60 calendar days after 

publication of this Federal Register 

notice. The deadline and requirement 

for submitting a Certification applies 

equally to NME-owned firms, wholly 

foreign-owned firms, and foreign sellers 

who purchase and export subject 

merchandise to the United States. 

Entities that currently do not have a 

separate rate from a completed segment 

of the proceeding 2 should timely file a 

Separate Rate Application to 

demonstrate eligibility for a separate 

rate in this proceeding. In addition, 

companies that received a separate rate 

in a completed segment of the 

proceeding that have subsequently 

made changes, including, but not 

limited to, changes to corporate 

structure, acquisitions of new 

companies or facilities, or changes to 

their official company name 3, should 

timely file a Separate Rate Application 

to demonstrate eligibility for a separate 

rate in this proceeding. The Separate 

Rate Status Application will be 

available on the Department’s Web site 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/nme/

nme-sep-rate.html on the date of 

publication of this Federal Register 

notice. In responding to the Separate 

Rate Status Application, refer to the 

instructions contained in the 

application. Separate Rate Status 

Applications are due to the Department 

no later than 60 calendar days of 

publication of this Federal Register 

notice. The deadline and requirement 

for submitting a Separate Rate Status 

Application applies equally to NMEowned firms, wholly foreign-owned 

firms, and foreign sellers that purchase 

and export subject merchandise to the 

United States. 

For exporters and producers who 

submit a separate-rate status application 

or certification and subsequently are 

selected as mandatory respondents, 

these exporters and producers will no 

longer be eligible for separate rate status 

unless they respond to all parts of the 

questionnaire as mandatory 

respondents. 

Initiation of Reviews 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i), we are initiating 

administrative reviews of the following 

antidumping and countervailing duty 

orders and findings. We intend to issue 

the final results of these reviews not 

later than October 31, 2015. 

Period to be reviewed 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings 

Mexico: 

Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod, A–201–830 ..................................................................................... 10/1/13–9/30/14 

Deacero, S.A. de C.V.

Deacero USA.

Mid-Continent Nail Company.

ArcelorMittal Las Truchas, S.A. de C.V.

ArcelorMittal International America LLC.

The People’s Republic of China: 

Polyvinyl Alcohol, A–570–879 ............................................................................................................................ 10/1/13–9/30/14 

Sinopec Sichuan Vinylon Works.

The People’s Republic of China: 

Steel Wire Garment Hangers, A–570–918 ........................................................................................................ 10/1/13–9/30/14 

Da Sheng Hanger Ind. Co., Ltd.

Feirongda Weaving Material Co. Ltd.

Hong Kong Wells Ltd.

Hangzhou Qingqing Mechanical Co. Ltd.

Hangzhou Yingqing Material Co. Ltd.


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
70852 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 229 / Friday, November 28, 2014 / Notices 

Period to be reviewed 

Hongye (HK) Group Development Co. Ltd.

Liaoning Metals & Mineral Imp/Exp Corp.

Nantong Eason Foreign Trade Co., Ltd.

Ningbo Bingcheng Import & Export Co. Ltd.

Ningbo Dasheng Hanger Ind. Co., Ltd.

Ningbo Peacebird Import & Export Co. Ltd.

Shang Zhou Leather Shoes Plant.

Shanghai Bao Heng Relay Making Co., Ltd.

Shanghai Ding Ying Printing & Dyeing Co. Ltd.

Shanghai Ganghun Beddiry Clothing Factory.

Shanghai Guoxing Metal Products Co. Ltd.

Shanghai Jianhai International Trade Co. Ltd.

Shanghai Lian Development Co. Ltd.

Shanghai Shuang Qiang Embroidery Factory Co. Ltd.

Shanghai Tonghui.

Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd.

Shangyu Baoli Electro Chemical Aluminum Products Co., Ltd.

Shangyu Baoxiang Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd.

Shangyu Tongfang Labour Protective Articles Co., Ltd.

Shaoxing Andrew Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd.

Shaoxing Dingli Metal Clotheshorse Co. Ltd.

Shaoxing Gangyuan Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd.

Shaoxing Guochao Metallic Products Co., Ltd.

Shaoxing Liangbao Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd.

Shaoxing Meideli Hanger Co. Ltd.

Shaoxing Shunji Metal Clotheshorse Co., Ltd.

Shaoxing Shuren Tie Co. Ltd.

Shaoxing Tongzhou Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd.

Shaoxing Zhongbao Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd.

Shaoxing Zhongdi Foreign Trade Co. Ltd.

Tianjin Innovation International.

Tianjin Tailai Import and Export Co. Ltd.

Wesken International (Kunshan) Co. Ltd.

Xia Fang Hanger (Cambodia) Co., Ltd.

Zhejiang Hongfei Plastic Industry Co. Ltd.

Zhejiang Jaguar Import & Export Co. Ltd.

Zhejiang Lucky Cloud Hanger Co. Ltd.

Countervailing Duty Proceedings 

None.

Suspension Agreements 

None.

Duty Absorption Reviews 

During any administrative review 

covering all or part of a period falling 

between the first and second or third 

and fourth anniversary of the 

publication of an antidumping duty 

order under 19 CFR 351.211 or a 

determination under 19 CFR 

351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or 

suspended investigation (after sunset 

review), the Secretary, if requested by a 

domestic interested party within 30 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of initiation of the review, will 

determine, consistent with FAG Italia v. 

United States, 291 F.3d 806 (Fed Cir. 

2002), as appropriate, whether 

antidumping duties have been absorbed 

by an exporter or producer subject to the 

review if the subject merchandise is 

sold in the United States through an 

importer that is affiliated with such 

exporter or producer. The request must 

include the name(s) of the exporter or 

producer for which the inquiry is 

requested. 

Gap Period Liquidation 

For the first administrative review of 

any order, there will be no assessment 

of antidumping or countervailing duties 

on entries of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption during the relevant 

provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of 

the order, if such a gap period is 

applicable to the POR. 

Administrative Protective Orders and 

Letters of Appearance 

Interested parties must submit 

applications for disclosure under 

administrative protective orders in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On 

January 22, 2008, the Department 

published Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Documents Submission Procedures; 

APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January 

22, 2008). Those procedures apply to 

administrative reviews included in this 

notice of initiation. Parties wishing to 

participate in any of these 

administrative reviews should ensure 

that they meet the requirements of these 

procedures (e.g., the filing of separate 

letters of appearance as discussed at 19 

CFR 351.103(d)). 

Revised Factual Information 

Requirements 

On April 10, 2013, the Department 

published Definition of Factual 

Information and Time Limits for 

Submission of Factual Information: 

Final Rule, 78 FR 21246 (April 10, 

2013), which modified two regulations 

related to antidumping and 

countervailing duty proceedings: the 

definition of factual information (19 

CFR 351.102(b)(21)), and the time limits 

for the submission of factual 

information (19 CFR 351.301). The final 

rule identifies five categories of factual 

information in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21), 

which are summarized as follows: (i) 

Evidence submitted in response to 

questionnaires; (ii) evidence submitted 

in support of allegations; (iii) publicly 

available information to value factors 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 229 / Friday, November 28, 2014 / Notices 70853 

4See section 782(b) of the Act. 

5See Certification of Factual Information to 

Import Administration During Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Interim Final 

Rule, 76 FR 7491 (February 10, 2011) (‘‘Interim 

Final Rule’’), amending 19 CFR 351.303(g)(1) and 

(2); Certification of Factual Information to Import 

Administration during Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Supplemental 

Interim Final Rule, 76 FR 54697 (September 2, 

2011). 

6See Certification of Factual Information To 

Import Administration During Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 

17, 2013) (‘‘Final Rule’’); see also the frequently 

asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_

info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. 

1See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 79 

FR 31306, 31306 (June 2, 2014). 

2See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Expedited 

Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Continued 

under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure 

the adequacy of remuneration under 19 

CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed 

on the record by the Department; and (v) 

evidence other than factual information 

described in (i)–(iv). The final rule 

requires any party, when submitting 

factual information, to specify under 

which subsection of 19 CFR 

351.102(b)(21) the information is being 

submitted and, if the information is 

submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct 

factual information already on the 

record, to provide an explanation 

identifying the information already on 

the record that the factual information 

seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The 

final rule also modified 19 CFR 351.301 

so that, rather than providing general 

time limits, there are specific time limits 

based on the type of factual information 

being submitted. These modifications 

are effective for all segments initiated on 

or after May 10, 2013. Please review the 

final rule, available at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/

1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to 

submitting factual information in this 

segment. 

Any party submitting factual 

information in an antidumping duty or 

countervailing duty proceeding must 

certify to the accuracy and completeness 

of that information.4 Parties are hereby 

reminded that revised certification 

requirements are in effect for company/ 

government officials as well as their 

representatives. Ongoing segments of 

any antidumping duty or countervailing 

duty proceedings initiated on or after 

March 14, 2011 should use the formats 

for the revised certifications provided at 

the end of the Interim Final Rule.5 All 

segments of any antidumping duty or 

countervailing duty proceedings 

initiated on or after August 16, 2013, 

should use the formats for the revised 

certifications provided at the end of the 

Final Rule.6 The Department intends to 

reject factual submissions in any 

proceeding segments if the submitting 

party does not comply with applicable 

revised certification requirements. 

Revised Extension of Time Limits 

Regulation 

On September 20, 2013, the 

Department modified its regulation 

concerning the extension of time limits 

for submissions in antidumping and 

countervailing duty proceedings: Final 

Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013). 

The modification clarifies that parties 

may request an extension of time limits 

before a time limit established under 

Part 351 expires, or as otherwise 

specified by the Secretary. In general, an 

extension request will be considered 

untimely if it is filed after the time limit 

established under Part 351 expires. For 

submissions which are due from 

multiple parties simultaneously, an 

extension request will be considered 

untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. on 

the due date. Examples include, but are 

not limited to: (1) Case and rebuttal 

briefs, filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309; 

(2) factual information to value factors 

under 19 CFR 351.408(c), or to measure 

the adequacy of remuneration under 19 

CFR 351.511(a)(2), filed pursuant to 19 

CFR 351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal, 

clarification and correction filed 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3) 

comments concerning the selection of a 

surrogate country and surrogate values 

and rebuttal; (4) comments concerning 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

data; and (5) quantity and value 

questionnaires. Under certain 

circumstances, the Department may 

elect to specify a different time limit by 

which extension requests will be 

considered untimely for submissions 

which are due from multiple parties 

simultaneously. In such a case, the 

Department will inform parties in the 

letter or memorandum setting forth the 

deadline (including a specified time) by 

which extension requests must be filed 

to be considered timely. This 

modification also requires that an 

extension request must be made in a 

separate, stand-alone submission, and 

clarifies the circumstances under which 

the Department will grant untimelyfiled requests for the extension of time 

limits. These modifications are effective 

for all segments initiated on or after 

October 21, 2013. Please review the 

final rule, available at http://

www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/

html/2013-22853.htm, prior to 

submitting factual information in these 

segments. 

These initiations and this notice are 

in accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i). 

Dated: November 21, 2014. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28148 Filed 11–26–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–552–801] 

Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Continuation of Antidumping Duty 

Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of the 

determinations by the Department of 

Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’) and the 

International Trade Commission (the 

‘‘ITC’’) that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

frozen fish fillets (‘‘fish fillets’’) from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam 

(‘‘Vietnam’’) would likely lead to a 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

and material injury to an industry in the 

United States, the Department is 

publishing a notice of continuation of 

the antidumping duty order. 

DATED: Effective November 28, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Walker, AD/CVD Operations, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–0413. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 2, 2014, the Department 

published a notice of initiation of the 

second sunset review of the 

antidumping duty order on fish fillets 

from Vietnam, pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’).1 As a result of its 

review, the Department determined that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

order on fish fillets from Vietnam would 

likely lead to a continuation or 

recurrence of dumping and, therefore, 

notified the ITC of the magnitude of the 

margins likely to prevail should the 

order be revoked.2 On November 4, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES