alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Altman *v.*Massell Realty Company *et al.*

Per Curiam.

1. The encumbrance on the property created by the lease placed thereon by the vendor, under the circumstances of this case, authorized the vendee to rescind, if otherwise she made a case for rescission.

*829No. 6688.

January 19, 1929.

Rehearing denied March 2, 1929.

2. The failure of the vendee to reeonvey the property to the vendor or to surrender to it its deed to the property would not defeat the rights of the vendee, it appearing that the vendor permitted the property to be sold at sheriff’s sale based on a prior encumbrance, and itself acquired the title to the property at the sale.

3. When the vendee discovered the lease encumbrance on the property and the inability of the vendor to give her possession, she immediately informed the vendor of her intention to rescind, and was prevented from speedily carrying out such intention by the repeated promises of the vendor to secure a release from the lessee of his rights under the lease and then to deliver possession of the premises to her, which promises it never kept, and by which petitioner was lulled into repose and inaction. The failure of the vendee to promptly exercise her right of rescission, under these circumstances, can not be taken advantage of by the vendor.

4. Furthermore, the petitioner makes a case for the recovery of damages for the fraud perpetrated upon her by the vendor.

5. Applying the foregoing rulings, the trial judge erred in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the petition.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*833*Krwuss & Strong*and *Branch & Howard,*for plaintiff.

*Jones, Hvins, Moore & Powers,*for defendants.
1 

## NO. 12

- 1 0

- 00 285

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

§ APPEAL FROM THE 420 TH

IN THE INTEREST OF C.H., C.H.,

§ JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

C.H. AND P.H., CHILDREN

§ NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction pursuant to Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 42.3(a).

This is an appeal from a judgment in a suit i n which termination of the parent

- child

relationship was in issue. Consequently, the procedures for accelerated appeals apply. See T EX

.

F AM

. C ODE A NN

. § 109.002(a) (Vernon 2008). Under rule of appellate procedure 26.1, the

notice of appeal in an acceler ated appeal must be filed within twenty days after the judgment is

signed

. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1(b). When an appeal is accelerated, filing a motion for new trial

does not extend the deadline for filing the notice of appeal. In re K.A.F. , 160 S.W.3d 923, 927

(Tex. 2005).

Here, t he trial court’s judgment was signed on June 17, 2010. Because this is an

accelerated appeal, the notice of appeal was due to have been filed on or before July 7, 2010.

However, Appellants did not file the notice of appeal unti l August 23, 2010. Although

Appellants filed a motion for new trial, that did not extend the time for filing the notice of

appeal. See id

. And they did not file a motion for an extension of time to file the notice of

appeal as permitted by rule of appel late procedure 26.3. Therefore, Appellant s ’ notice of appeal

was untimely, and this court has no jurisdiction of the appeal.2

On August 31, 2010 , this court notified Appellant s pursuant to Texas Rule s of Appellate

Procedure 37.1 and 42.3 that their notice of appeal was untimely and there was no timely motion

for an extension of time to file the notice of appeal as permitted by rule of appellate procedure

26 .3. Appellant s were further i nformed that unless the record was amended on or before

September 10, 20 10, to establish the jurisdiction of this court, the appeal would be dismissed.

The deadline for responding to this court’s August 31, 2010, notice has expired, and Appellant s

have neither responded to the notice nor established this court’s jurisdiction.

Because this court is not authorized to extend the time for perfecting an appeal except as

provided by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 26.1 and 26.3, the appeal is dismissed for want

of jurisdiction

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42.3(a).

Opinion delivered S eptember 22, 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4164 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to index for inflation the 

exemption amount for individuals under the alternative minimum tax 

and to repeal the alternative minimum tax on individuals in 2010. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2004 

Mr. SHUSTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to index 

for inflation the exemption amount for individuals under 

the alternative minimum tax and to repeal the alternative 

minimum tax on individuals in 2010. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INDEXING FOR INFLATION OF EXEMPTION 

4 AMOUNT FOR INDIVIDUALS UNDER THE AL5 TERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (d) of section 55 of the 

7 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exemption 
2 

•HR 4164 IH 

1 amount) is amended by inserting after paragraph (3) the 

2 following new paragraph: 

3 ‘‘(4) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.— 

4 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any 

5 taxable year beginning in a calendar year after 

6 2004, the dollar amounts contained in subpara7 graphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (1) shall be 

8 increased by an amount equal to— 

9 ‘‘(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

10 ‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de11 termined under section 1(f)(3) for the cal12 endar year in which the taxable year be13 gins, determined by substituting ‘2003’ for 

14 ‘1992’ in subparagraph (B) thereof. 

15 ‘‘(B) ROUNDING.—Any increase deter16 mined under subparagraph (A) which is not a 

17 multiple of $50 shall be rounded to the next 

18 lowest multiple of $50.’’. 

19 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

20 (1) Section 55(d)(1)(A) of such Code is amend21 ed by striking ‘‘$45,000 ($58,000 in the case of tax22 able years beginning in 2003 and 2004)’’ and insert23 ing ‘‘$58,000’’. 

24 (2) Section 55(d)(1)(A) of such Code is amend25 ed by striking ‘‘$33,750 ($40,250 in the case of tax-
3 

•HR 4164 IH 

1 able years beginning in 2003 and 2004)’’ and insert2 ing ‘‘$40,250’’. 

3 (3) Subsection (a) of section 901 of the Eco4 nomic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 

5 2001 shall not apply to the amendments made by 

6 title VII of such Act (relating to alternative min7 imum tax). 

8 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

10 December 31, 2004. 

11 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX IN 2010. 

12 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 55 of the 

13 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at 

14 the end the following new flush sentence: 

15 ‘‘Notwithstanding subsection (b), in the case of a taxpayer 

16 other than a corporation, the tentative minimum tax for 

17 any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2009, shall 

18 be zero.’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

20 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

21 December 31, 2009. 

Æ
!"#

$%&&'((')*&%)*&+&,

		-./01

23'45467"8 9 987:;<=3;>7?=36@;??;ABCDED>=C7D3$6,77:;+3D7;A%7=7;6D67?DC7)4?7@?7:;?7:;?3 D67?DC7@F>>D3D6@?C?AD3=7;A?C36>DA=7;AG?;7?D=>G?C;;AD356G4?64=377 #+%)HI"9JKLL"#I M%4GGNAINNI$O< 9 9,%D3C;7:=77DP;8I =AAD7D3=>=C7D3$6,:=E;Q;;37?=36@;??;A77:;

?7:;?3D67?DC7@F>>D3D6RD7:7:;C36;37@7:=7C4?78=>>64C:=C7D36:=E;Q;;3=66D53;A77:; *3?=Q>;S;Q;CC=S<=>>P;T;?

F7=GG;=?67:=77:;=C7D3$6,37:D6C3AD7D3=>7?=36@;??A;?D3E>E;U4;67D36@@=C77:=7=?;CPP377:; =C7D36G?;ED46>T7?=36@;??;A77:;?7:;?3D67?DC7@F>>D3D6=3A=66D53;A7O4A5;<=>>P;T;?

<4?64=377S4>;JI@7:;S4>;6@<?C;A4?;@7:;+3D7;A%7=7;6O4ADCD=><=3;>34>7DAD67?DC7D7D5=7D38 7:;=C7D3$6,37:;=77=C:;A6C:;A4>;=?;7?=36@;??;A43A;? #+%)HI"9J77:;?7:;?3D67?DC7@ F>>D3D6@?7:;?;=63667=7;AD37:;?A;?@'45467"8 9 98=3A8VD7:7:;C36;37@7:=7C4?78=66D53;A7

7:;*3?=Q>;S;Q;CC=S<=>>P;T;?

(:D6?A;?A;637Q;CP;;@@;C7DE;437D>D7D6@D>;AD37:;2@@DC;@7:;)>;?W@7:;+3D7;A%7=7;6D67?DC7 )4?7@?7:;?7:;?3D67?DC7@F>>D3D6(:;7?=36PD77=>@7:D6?A;?76=DA)>;?W6:=>>Q;67=T;AJA=T6 @?P7:;;37?T7:;?;@F@=3TG=?7T@D>;6=37DC;@GG6D7D3VD7:7:;)>;?W@7:;<=3;>VD7:D37:D6JXA=T

G;?DA87:;67=TVD>>Q;C37D34;A437D>@4?7:;??A;?@7:;<=3;>

M2S(*&<'&Y

O:3RDC:>6

)>;?W@7:;<=3;>

Z[\]^_`abcdefg_bhij]klmnopqr]softmetduv[w]mbxd

yz{|}~





{~~ 



¡¢£¤¥ ¦§ ̈©§a«a¬

­® ̄°±23 ́μ¶·­ ̄ ̧ 1o»¶1⁄41⁄2· ́2 ́3⁄4¿2­¶¿1­1 ̄·¶­

ÀÁÂÃÄÅÆÇÆÈ

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 294 Filed: 04/19/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:13402
	

	


	


 !	"#""		


!
 ! 	 
	$%&'()&%$*+)%

$%$,-../. 012314567%489:;<;=>2+5>+>&4<1?@A

$%$,-..B @95?C@%AD@9@42+5>+>&4<1?@A

$%$,-..E. F)2+5>+>G&4<1?@A

$%$,-./.HE 5<;@1A862+5>+>G&4<1?@A

F*()F&%()+I*)

F%/,-..,B 7<;=A?12+5>+>&4<1?@A

J*70K%&%*%7+*)

J%*,-..HH 'LF(M1?@A2+&M+(M&$1?@A

NOPQRSTUVWXYZ[SV\]^Q_`abcdefQgcZhaYhXijOkQXVlX

mnopqormstm

mnopqormstn

mnopqormsts

mnopqormstu

mnopqormstt

mnopqormstv

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 294 Filed: 04/19/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:13403
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3992 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3992

   To amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to require 
preparation of statements regarding the environmental impacts of legal 
                        and illegal immigration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2004

Mr. Tancredo (for himself and Mr. Rohrabacher) introduced the following 
         bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to require 
preparation of statements regarding the environmental impacts of legal 
                        and illegal immigration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STATEMENTS DESCRIBING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF LEGAL AND 
              ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION.

    Section 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 
U.S.C. 4332) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a)'' before the first sentence; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) The Secretary of Homeland Security and the Administrator of 
the Environmental Protection Agency shall jointly prepare and publish 
every 5 years a statement in accordance with subsection (a)(2)(C) with 
respect to the environmental impacts of legal and illegal immigration, 
for use in determining and setting appropriate and environmentally 
sustainable levels for legal immigration and the most effective 
measures needed to prevent illegal immigration.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Balance Sheet and Income Statement dated March 31, 1997, on Form 10-QSB, 
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-QSB dated 
March 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                   0000837987
<NAME>                  Wasatch Education Systems Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>            1
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                  1,420,917  
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1,420,917
<PP&E>                                  3,362,277
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          4,783,194
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   1,214,072
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                            10,046,781
<COMMON>                               11,781,511
<OTHER-SE>                            (18,259,108)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            4,783,194
<SALES>                                   932,903
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          932,903
<CGS>                                   1,273,453
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           1,273,453
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          925,058
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        112,204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           117,295
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       117,295
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               91,659
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .01 
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                           OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                            24
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 21,750
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              21,774
<PP&E>                                                        31,440
<DEPRECIATION>                                               (19,295)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                62,702
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        364,863
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                       3,469
<OTHER-SE>                                                  (302,160)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  62,702
<SALES>                                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                   0
<CGS>                                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  1,022
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               3,660
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (4,682)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (4,682)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      0



</TABLE>
NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION SAFETY TEAM ADVISORY COMMITTEE (NCSTAC) MEETING

16 May 2018

ONLINE MEETING

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS & TECHNOLOGY (NIST)

100 BUREAU DRIVE, GAITHERSBURG, MD 20899

AGENDA

MEETING GOAL:

• Brief the Committee and seek the Committee’s advice on the goals of the NCST 

investigation of Hurricane Maria’s effects on the U.S. territory of Puerto Rico.

Tuesday, May 16, 2018

Time Topic Discussion Leader

1:00 – 1:05pm Call to Order

Roll Call

Judith Mitrani-Reiser

Director, Disaster & Failure 

Studies Program

NIST

1:05 – 1:10pm Welcome

Opening Remarks

Howard Harary

Director, Engineering 

Laboratory 

Designated Federal Officer 

NIST

1:10 – 1:15pm Review of Meeting Goals and Agenda 

 

James Harris

NCSTAC Chairperson

Owner

JR Harris & Co.

1:15 – 1:30pm Brief Overview of DFS, NIST Statutory Programs, 

and Goals of the Hurricane Maria NCST 

Investigation

Judith Mitrani-Reiser

NIST

1:30 – 1:45pm NCST Investigation Goal 1: the wind 

environment and technical conditions

associated with deaths and injuries

Joseph Main

Program Manager, Structures 

Group

NIST

1:45 – 2:00pm NCST Investigation Goal 1: the wind 

environment and technical conditions 

associated with deaths and injuries

Judith Mitrani-Reiser

NIST
Tuesday, May 16, 2018

Time Topic Discussion Leader

2:00 – 2:15pm NCST Investigation Goal 2: the performance of 

representative critical buildings, and designated 

safe areas in those buildings, including their 

dependence on lifelines

Joseph Main

NIST

2:15 – 2:30pm NCST Investigation Goal 3: the performance of 

emergency communications systems and the 

public’s response to such communications

Erica Kuligowski

Research Social Scientist, WUI 

Group

NIST

2:30 – 2:45pm Projected Impacts on Codes and Standards Jason Averill

Division Chief, Materials and 

Structural Systems Director

NIST

2:45 – 3:45pm Discussion James Harris

3:45 – 4:00pm Public Input Period

ADJOURN
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





I, Lorie M. Guerrera, Chief Accounting Officer of Cordia Corporation (the Registrant) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period June 30, 2004 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report):

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By:/s/ Lorie M. Guerrera



Lorie M. Guerrera

Chief Accounting Officer



August 12, 2004









*

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cordia Corporation and will be retained by Cordia Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
```

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statements  No.
33-54479  and No.  333-101903  on Form S-8 of our reports  dated March 14, 2006,
(which  includes an explanatory  paragraph  regarding the ability of MAXXAM Inc.
and  subsidiaries  to realize their timber  related  assets and discharge  their
timber related liabilities in the normal course of business and to continue as a
going  concern)  relating to the financial  statements  and financial  statement
schedules  of MAXXAM  Inc.,  and  management's  report on the  effectiveness  of
internal control over financial reporting appearing in the Annual Report on Form
10-K of MAXXAM Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Houston, Texas
March 14, 2006
```
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, the Corporate Trustee ofMesabi Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge, the Annual Report of Mesabi Trust on Form 10-K for the fiscal yearended January 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that informationcontained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Mesabi Trust.

 
| /s/ Rodney  Gaughan                   |   | April 18,  2003 |
|---------------------------------------|--------|-----------------|
| Rodney  Gaughan*                      |   |
| Assistant  Vice President             |   |
| Deutsche Bank  Trust Company Americas |   |

 

----

* There are no principalexecutive officers or principal financial officers of the registrant.

 

*A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Mesabi Trust and will be retainedby Mesabi Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.*

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 22, 2015

p1214

Order 

Clerk

December 22, 2015

151138(62)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 151138

COA: 314684

Oakland CC: 2011-238692-FC

JEFFREY BERNARD PYNE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 28, 2015 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
# STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL, FIRSTCIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO. 2023 KW 0116 HUEY KENNEDY 

### APRIL 12, 2023 In Re: BEFORE: Huey Kennedy, applying for supervisory writs,

Judicial District Court, Parish of Lafourche, 194182. McCLENDON, HOLDRIDGE, AND GREENE, JJ. 17th No.
WRIT DENIED. Relator failed to meet his burden of showing that he is entitled to an out-of-time appeal via an application for postconviction relief. See La. Code Crim. P. art. 930.S(A).

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT PMc GH HG