alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DESCRIPTION BY DATE

ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION 09/06/13
PRE-BID CLARIFICATION 11/08/13
RA
—
GENERAL NOTES:

1. SEE DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL PIPING SPECIALTIES
REQUIRED AT EQUIPMENT.

+—[P ] WALL MOUNTED

ti

[d\
(it/ BAROMETRIC

©
PL [oe mat | eae hes oe } PG }

£0 \
a _ Go ©
mace! age! “
“

L0\
\3/ — —_—_
am ame ole &
_ | — HY . \2/
|
= =
Ly
a4 z
& BAROMETRIC
NE Say
cra. Bo Pe || BR -_ Haig ?
(ELECTRIC) | = (MODULATING SCR ELEC) -_ |
Ld\
oy | 7B He ©
PRE—HEAT cou! COOLING COIL f .
(ELECTRIC) GLYCOL) /B\ NI-4357 TEMPERATURE SENSOR — INSTALLED BY END USER, PROVIDE WITH 2’ OF STRAIGHT
way, DUCTWORK UPSTREAM OF SENSOR LOCATION
\2/ [FI Nl-4300 PRESSURE SENSOR — INSTALLED BY END USER
O-— MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT:
Fl ow VELOCITY WAND — INSTALLED BY END USER, PROVIDE WITH 4’ OF STRAIGHT
RA N=6365 DUCTWORK UPSTREAM OF WAND LOCATION
a
L JHERMAL MASS BUFFER TANK NI-6238 HUMIDITY SENSOR — INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR
RELIEF (NP OF 4)
-_ ~< Ni-6363 SWITCH — INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR
| BAROMETRIC
| DAMPER — INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR ENGINEERING
MEP CONSULTANTS
aN AIRFLOW DIAGRAM 20251 Century BLvp #125
GERMANTOWN, MD 20874
577 NOT TO SCALE P: 877-871-4229
F: 301-560-6336
JFORD@CFRENGINEERING.COM
~ | PROJECT #12074
O —- — HR — YY 1
DP] —< ; wane
O—e — th _ HS _ Ss
1-1/2" ]
x |
ey PREHEAT COIL (ELECTRIC) a
BALANCING VALVE (TYP) ——
AIRFLOW | COOLING COIL (DIRECT EXPANSION) ~~ 7a
f AED GD
uv=z-10v0e @-XI—+9- KH Pa 1-1/2”
Ou _— V a al
oO
& y WA. AIF AIRFLOW | AIRFLOW |
—_n
\
\ a | JAH ZAHN
O-oF 4% COR — VC — — 1 SIZED TO SIMULATE BOTH AHU’S S ay AIR HANDLING UNIT
_— o
/ , 2-1/2" iE aie af Awww af Aw HEATING COIL (ELECTRIC)
2-1/2 2-1/2 2 />——
( 2 ” ” LV\ ” COOLING COIL (GLYCOL)
i @ & “a @ ap @ey @ at
ofl eg % Qoy
mi ae _ A VA ~ Vos F —avi- KH —vi- KH —vi- KH
a WW Vv r7 | UV=Z-10VDC \ UV=Z-10VDC UV=Z-10VDC
§ asa, 2” || 1-1/2" (FH 2 (FHE [FH-
d \4y N
( 3/4” )
t Va penenneeen CHILLER i]
CONDENSER
( 1/2” (YP OF 4) ) EVAPORATOR) —— eo | . | .
( ) Y . 4 x | = 4 —_
¢ CS ) KI Ny > >
( ey ) ~ ~ AREA OF WORK |
( cR--—_ ) -
( . ; ‘> ops an ¥
( se | A qc qc a a a |
GR GR — GR
( cR-— 5 I 7 ww _/ UT} WA — 7 7 7 UC 1
/ Le" j 1-1/2" ge 1-1/2" ge 1-1/2" 2 2” 2 a
‘ CS ® ) <= © ——-8 aE
( ck — } > THERMAL STORAGE
( j ® Pana # Ni, mi | \
\ cS \27/ <> <>
| mae o
t cR — i?) VW WW,
’ ; pF] pF]
NE NE EO IN aN [FH- =o AS aN aN
I _ Y WA cs ~/ S IF -_ cs Ss _ S |
2” 2”
Vi S ;
2” |
NI=4357  THERMOWELL — INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR, PROVIDE WITH 3-4 DIAMETERS OF STRAIGHT PIPING
alt AT SENSOR LOCATION. SENSOR HEAD PROVIDED BY END USER U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
TO_EXPANSION TANK Ni-4300 PRESSURE GAUGE - TAKEOFF, 34” VALVE, AND CAPPED STUB-OUT INSTALLED BY NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY
SEE DETAIL CONTRACTOR. GAGE BLOCK / PORTS PROVIDED BY END USER
Ni=4300  FLOWMETER — INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR, PROVIDE 3-4” STRAIGHT PIPE AT SENSOR BUILDING 226 — ROOM Al22 HVAC TESTING LAB
(2TM HYDRONIC DIAGRAM 7 LOCATION. SENSOR HEAD PROVIDED BY END USER
B77 NOT TO SCALE
NI-6363 SWITCH — INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR MECHANICAL SYSTEM DIAGRAMS

DP# N/A | SHLNO. 13 or 16) DWG. 226-372

DES RO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                   1,430
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             0
<PP&E>                                      56
<DEPRECIATION>                              56
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,810
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        0
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                               1,773
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,810
<SALES>                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           156
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             (73)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         (190)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            229
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        229
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                               229
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            28.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in this registration
statement on Form S-8 of our report dated March 26, 1998, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of Capstar Broadcasting Corporation and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1997, and for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 1997.

PRICE WATERHOUSE COOPERS LLP

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Austin, Texas
July 22, 1998
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Lawrence H. Wolfe, Chief Executive Officer of Mera Pharmaceuticals, certify that (1) Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 3 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2011 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.




Date: July 25, 2012/s/Lawrence H. WolfeLawrence H. WolfePrincipal Financial and Accounting Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Section 1350
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Merck & Co., Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: March 11, 2005
    
    
    
    /s/ Judy C. LewentName:
    
    Judy C. LewentTitle:
    
    Executive Vice President & Chief
    Financial Officer
President, Human Health Asia
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000837290
<NAME> SHERRI NITTA
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,947
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,785
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,354
<PP&E>                                         224,023
<DEPRECIATION>                                  69,467
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 168,433
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,172
<BONDS>                                         65,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,945
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,153
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   168,433
<SALES>                                         11,759
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,884
<CGS>                                            9,309
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,309
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   774
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 956
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,219
<INCOME-TAX>                                       463
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                756
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       756
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEPTEMBER
30, 1998 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         12,417
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   400
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               12,817
<PP&E>                                         35,113
<DEPRECIATION>                                 12,285
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 35,645
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          406,686
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       5,276,289
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,647,330
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (35,645)
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               59,696
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,063
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (63,759)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (63,759)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (63,759)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.001
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.001
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of Miller Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending April 30, 2011
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Angelo Napolitano,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated:   April 8, 2012      | 
|--------------------------- | 
|                            | 
|/s/  Angelo Napolitano      | 
|Angelo Napolitano           | 
|Chief Executive Officer and | 
|Chief Financial Officer     | 



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Miller Industries, Inc.
and will be returned by Miller Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





-1-
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4222 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:h4222enr.txt]

        H.R.4222

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
550 Nebraska Avenue in Kansas City, Kansas, as the ``Newell George Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 550 
Nebraska Avenue in Kansas City, Kansas, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Newell George Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Newell George Post Office 
Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
10845.

#### Muse *v.*The State.

Decided November 7, 1919.

Rehearing denied December 9, 1919.

Accusation of possession of intoxicating liquor; from city court of Valdosta—Judge Cranford. August 8. 1919.

The only testimony at the trial was that of the sheriff, H. M. Passmore. He testified that he searched the house of Chicken Muse, the defendant, and found there a locked trunk, which he asked the defendant to open; that the defendant “took his keys *428out” and unlocked the trunk, and nearly six pints of whisky and about two thirds of a bottle of “shine” were found in it; that the only statement that the defendant made about the liquor 'was that “a fellow left it there;” he was asked but did not tell who left it there. The only ground of the motion for a new trial other than the general grounds was that the court illegally admitted, over objection of counsel for the defendant, “the following material evidence, to wit:” setting out the testimony that the whisky was found in the trunk; to which testimony the defendant objected on the ground that he was ordered by the sheriff to open the trunk, and was thereby compelled to give evidence tending to criminate himself.

*427Bloodworth, J.

1. “Under repeated rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court, a ground of a motion for a new trial complaining of the admission of testimony must be complete within itself, and not such as to require the reviewing court to refer to the brief of evidence or other parts of the record in order to determine the question of the admissibility of the testimony. A ground of a motion for a new trial which complains of the admission of certain specified testimony upon the trial of the case must state the name of the witness whose- testimony is complained of.” *Peeples*v. *Butler,*21 *Ga. App.*310 (94 S. E. 278). Under the above ruling the special ground of the motion for new trial cannot be considered by this court, because to do so it would be necessary to refer to the brief of evidence and ascertain *(a)*the name of the witness whose evidence is objected to and that he is the only witness in the case; (5) when, where, and in whose possession was found the whisky referred to; (c) what sheriff was referred to, and what actually occurred when the defendant, as alleged, was “made to produce the key from his pocket and open the trunk himself”; *(d)*whose trunk was referred to, and what connection, if any, it had with the whisky.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, ,and is approved by the trial judge.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, O. J., and Luhe, J., concur.*

*428In the motion for a rehearing it was contended that the ruling quoted in the decision should'not be applied where the only evidence in the brief of the evidence is the testimony of one witness and it is very brief.

*James M. J oJmson,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. B. Copeland, solicitor,*contra.
Exhibit 32.2





Certification


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Synergetics USA, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Pamela G. Boone, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: December 12, 2011
 
 /s/ Pamela G. BoonePamela G. BooneExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,Treasurer and Secretary
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3


CAPSTAR RADIO BROADCASTING PARTNERS COMPLETES
TENDER OFFER FOR SENIOR SUBORDINATED NOTES

         AUSTIN, TEXAS, APRIL 29, 1998 -- Capstar Radio Broadcasting Partners,
Inc. ("Capstar Radio"), a subsidiary of Capstar Broadcasting Partners, Inc.,
announced today that it has completed its offer to purchase its 13 1/4% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2003 (the "Notes"). The company's cash tender offer and
related consent solicitation, which commenced on March 30, 1998, expired at 5:00
p.m., New York City time, on Monday, April 27, 1998 (the "Expiration Date").

         As of the Expiration Date, $76,808,000 aggregate principal amount of
the Notes representing 100% of the outstanding Notes had been validly tendered
and not withdrawn. All Notes validly tendered with respect to the tender offer
prior to expiration were accepted for payment. In addition, the Company received
the requisite consents to the proposed amendments to the Indenture pursuant to
which the Notes were issued.

         BT Alex. Brown Incorporated served as the Dealer Manager for the tender
offer and the consent solicitation.

         Capstar Radio is the largest radio broadcaster in the United States
operating primarily in mid-sized markets. Since its first acquisition in October
1996, Capstar Radio has assembled, on a pro forma basis after giving effect to
pending transactions, a nationwide portfolio of 300 owned and operated or
programmed stations in 75 mid-sized markets.


For more information contact:


         Lisa Dollinger
         Capstar Radio Broadcasting Partners, Inc.
         600 Congress Avenue, Suite 1400
         Austin, Texas
         Telephone No.     (512) 340-7800
10369.

#### Heed, receiver, *v.*Dorris & Company *et al.*

Decided October 20, 1919.

Jenkins, P. J.

Even though it be conceded that where the consignee of an interstate shipment of freight proceeds, without notice to the shipper, to reconsign the goods upon the original bill of lading to a third person, and such third person refuses to accept them, the carrier who transports the goods under the reeonsignment can ordinarily recover from the original consignor the freight and demurrage charges which have accrued thereon, provided that it has notified the original consignor with reasonable promptness of such failure to accept (see *Jelks*v. *Philadelphia & Reading Ry. Co.,*14 *Ga. App.*96, (80 S. E. 216); *B.*& O. *Railroad Co.*v. *Montgomery,*19 *Ga. App.*29, 90 S. E. 740), still, in this case, since it appears from the petition itself that the carrier failed to give notice of such refusal to the original consignor, but proceeded to dispose of the goods and to convert the proceeds to its own use, without showing any reason why the giving of such notice was, under the circumstances, impracticable, the trial court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to its petition in a suit against the original consignor. *Bird*v. *Georgia Railroad,*72 *Ga.*655; *Merchants & Miners Transportation Co.*v. *Moore,*124 *Ga.*482 (52 S. E. 802), *Alabama Great So. R. Co.*v. *McKenzie,*139 *Ga.*410 (77 S. E. 647, 45 L. R. A. (N. S.) 18); *Atlantic Coast-Line R. Co.*v. *Goodwin,*1 *Ga. App.*351 (57 S. E. 1070); *Atlantic Coast-Line R. Co.*v. *Henderson Elevator Co.,*18 Ga. *App.*279 (88 S. E. 101); C., *N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.*v. *Malsby Co.,*22 Ga. *App.*595 (3) (96 S. E. 710).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.*

*294Complaint; from city court of Yaldosta—Judge Cranford. January 28, 1919.

*Patterson & Copeland,*for plaintiff in error.

*Franklin & Langdale,*contra.
#### H. N. & J. W. McGhee *v.*L. B. McGhee, etc.

Evidence — Receipt on Margin of Deed — Competency.

The receipt of Johnson and Jewell, written on the margin of the deed, was as to the parties to this suit only a written statement of third parties, not verified in any form, necessary to render it competent as testimony.

APPEAL PROM HICKMAN CIRCUIT COURT.

September 27, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Hardin :

The receipt of Johnson and Jewell, written on the margin of the deed from L. W. McGhee to appellants, was, as between the parties to this suit, only a written statement of third parties, not verified in any form, necessary to render it competent as testimony in this case, and it was therefore properly rejected by the court.

Without elaboration or analysis of the facts on which the correctness of the judgment declaring said deed fraudulent and *452invalid must depend, it is deemed sufficient to say that the preponderance of the evidence seems to us to sustain the conclusion of the circuit court.

*Crossland ,for appellants.*

*Lindsay, for appellees.*

The judgment is therefore affirmed. Judge Lindsay not sitting.