alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
10807.

#### EUNICE *v.*RELIANCE FERTILIZER CO. *et al.*

The judgment denying the motion to distribute funds was not erroneous for any reason assigned.

Decided March 2, 1920.

Motion to distribute funds; from city court of Blackshear— Judge Mitchell. June 16, 1919.

*Parker & Parker,*for plaintiff in error.

*Memory & Memory,*contra.

Bloodworm, J.

The Reliance Fertilizer Company sued C. W. Eunice. Pending the suit a garnishment was obtained by the plaintiff and summons served on the Blackshear Bank on February *25,*1919, and on the next day judgment was obtained on the original suit. On March 10, 1919, the bank answered the summons of garnishment, admitting indebtedness to the defendant, C. W. Eunice, in the sum of $650. On March 11, 1919, G. B. Eunice, filed in the court a motion in which he alleged that he held fi. fas. against C. *W.*Eunice which were prior liens to that of the fertilizer company, and prayed that “the funds in the hands of the garnishee be directed by the court to be paid to the petitioner on his judgments, according to the law as made and provided in such cases.” On the same day he served notice on the bank above named that he claimed “any and all funds held up in its possession” under the garnishment proceedings in favor of the Reliance Fertilizer Company against C. *W.*Eunice. He also served notice upon the sheriff that He Had fi. fas. which constituted a prior lien on the said fund, and placed said fi. fas. in the hands of the sheriff. *780On March 17, 1919, the court rendered judgment against the bank in favor of the fertilizer company, and execution issued on this judgment. The bank paid to the attorney for the fertilizer company the amount which it answered it was indebted to C. *W.*Eunice, and took up the execution issued on the judgment against the bank, and also took a receipt showing settlement of the judgment. On June 18, 1919, the motion to distribute funds was called for a hearing. The record shows that on this alleged motion no order of any kind was ever entered by the court; there was no order making any one a party to the proceedings, and no one was served or acknowledged service thereof. On the hearing of the motion the movant introduced certain evidence. The bill of exceptions recites that "the defendants nor either of them introduced any evidence, but counsel for Eeliance Fertilizer Company took the position that there were no parties defendant before the court or proceedings to authorize a judgment distributing funds. After argument of counsel the court rendered judgment in said case, refusing and denying the motion to distribute, holding that there was no motion before the court sufficient to subject the fund claimed to distribution.” G. B. Eunice excepted to this ruling and brought the case to this court for review, naming the Blackshear Bank, J. W. Eoberson, sheriff, and the Eeliance Fertilizer Company as defendants in error.

The ruling complained of was' right.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.*
H. R. 4471

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To clarify the loan guarantee authority under title VI of the Native American

Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Homeownership Opportunities

for Native Americans Act of 2004’’.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL GUARANTEES FOR FINANCING FOR TRIBAL HOUSING

ACTIVITIES.

Section 601 of the Native American Housing Assistance and

Self-Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4191) is amended by

adding at the end the following new subsection:

‘‘(d) LIMITATION ON PERCENTAGE.—A guarantee made under

this title shall guarantee repayment of 95 percent of the unpaid

principal and interest due on the notes or other obligations guaranteed.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Daniel P. Beharry, Chief Executive Officer of Mera Pharmaceuticals, certify
that (1) Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 3 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2003 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of Mera
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


                                     /s/ DANIEL P. BEHARRY
                                     ---------------------
                                     Daniel P. Beharry
                                     Chief Executive Officer

                                     September 19, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Mera
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
10514.

#### Ellison *v.*The State.

Decided June 13, 1919.

Indictment for misdemeanor; from Eloyd superior court—Judge Wright. March 31, 1919.

*W. B. Mebane,*for plaintiff in error.

*O. H. Porter, solicitor-general,*contra.

Bloodwortji, J.

Plaintiff in error was convicted of appearing in an intoxicated condition on a public street in Rome. The only reason urged why a new trial should be granted is that “the evidence fails to show what produced the intoxication of plaintiff in error.” That he was drunk at the time and place alleged is not denied. Granting (but not deciding) that it is necessary for the State to show that “said drunkenness or intoxication may be caused by the excessive use of intoxicating wines, beers, liquors, or opiates,” the evidence was sufficient to show that the intoxication of the plaintiff in error was caused by the excessive drinking of beer, one of the intoxicating liquors named in the statute (Penal Code of 1910, § 442), for the violation of which he was indicted.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.*
V 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4049

For the relief of Ahmad Khabaz Taghizadeh and Azammolok Taghizadeh 

Vatani. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 25, 2004

Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Ahmad Khabaz Taghizadeh and Azammolok 

Taghizadeh Vatani.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CITIZENSHIP FOR AHMAD KHABAZ 

4 TAGHIZADEH AND AZAMMOLOK TAGHIZADEH 

5 VATANI. 

6 Notwithstanding title III of the Immigration and Na7 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.), Ahmad Khabaz 

8 Taghizadeh and Azammolok Taghizadeh Vatani shall each 

9 be considered to be a naturalized citizen of the United 

10 States as of the date of the enactment of this Act and 
2

•HR 4049 IH 

1 shall each be furnished by the Secretary of Homeland Se2 curity with a certificate of naturalization.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



I, Gandolfo Verra, Chief Financial Officer of Cordia Corporation (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period June 30, 2008 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By: /s/ Gandolfo Verra



Gandolfo Verra

Chief Financial Officer



August 14, 2008



* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cordia Corporation and will be retained by Cordia Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4566 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4566

                 For the relief of Konstantinos Ritos.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2004

 Mr. Ramstad introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 For the relief of Konstantinos Ritos.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR KONSTANTINOS RITOS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Konstantinos Ritos shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Konstantinos Ritos enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall 
be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Konstantinos Ritos, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Konstantinos 
Ritos shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, 
privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

_______ _________________

No . 16

- 15838

________________________

D.C. No

. 1:15

- cv

- 24350

- KMM

RICARDO AGUILA,

and other similarly situated individuals,

TERESA AGUILA,

Plaintiff s

- Appellant s

,

v ersus

CORPORATE CATERERS IV , INC.

, a Florida profit corporation

Defendant

,

CORPORATE CATERERS II, INC.,

JIM GASS

, individually,

Defendant s

- Appellee s

.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

( March 24, 2017 ) Case: 16-15838 Date Filed: 03/24/2017 Page: 1 of 22 Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, ANDERSON and PARKER

, * Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Having care fully considered the written submissions and the arguments of

the parties and of the amicus curiae , we conclude that there is no free standing

claim for relief under section 203(m) of the Fair Labor Standards Act , 29 U.S.C. §

203(m), where , as here, the re is no allegation that the employer does not pay the

minimum wage. Accordingly

, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

* Honorable Barrington D. Parker, Jr., United States Circuit Judge for the Second Circuit,

sitting by designation.

Case: 16-15838 Date Filed: 03/24/2017 Page: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,048
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,398
<PP&E>                                          12,774
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,955
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             135,560,526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,944,120
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       152,149
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,709,527
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               135,560,526
<SALES>                                        154,172
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               337,605
<CGS>                                           70,075
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  119,894
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,204 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                217,711 
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            217,711 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   217,711
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this post-effective amendment No. 1 on Form S-8, to be filed on or
around September 14, 1998, of our report dated May 27, 1998, on the consolidated
financial statements of WorldCom, Inc. included in WorldCom, Inc.'s Current
Report on Form 8-K dated May 28, 1998 (filed May 28, 1998) and to all references
to our Firm in this registration statement.



                                        ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Jackson, Mississippi,
September 14, 1998.
#### Conklin et al. *v.*Morton et al.

Referee.—Report.—When a referee has made his report, his powers and functions are ended, and a subsequent report is a nullity and should be disregarded.

APPEAL from the Wayne Circuit Court.

Worden, J.

This was an action by the appellants against the appellees, to recover possession of certain real estate, and to quiet the title thereto.

The answer of the defendant Morton set up that he had an equitable mortgage on the property, and he sought to have his claim adjusted and his lien on the property declared and enforced. Issues were formed, and by the agreement of the parties the cause was referred to a referee for trial.

The referee made his report, to the court, of the facts *77found by him, and among other things he found that there was due -to Morton, on the claim set up by him, the sum of seven hundred and eighty-seven dollars and seventy-one cents. After having made this report, the matter not having been again referred to him, he made a further report, in which he says, that “he has, since making his report herein, made a further examination of the evidence and pleadings herein, and finds and now reports to the court that his former report should be corrected in these three particulars,. to wit:” etc. The three particulars are then stated, and the conclusion arrived at that there was due to Morton the sum of eight hundred and eighty-seven dollars and ninety-one cents, instead of the sum stated in the former report.

*F W. Medsker,*for appellants.

The plaintiffs took exceptions to the alteration of the report of the referee, but the exceptions were overruled, and they excepted. Judgment was then rendered on the report of the referee as thus amended. In this, we think, the court erred. When the referee had made his report, his functions as such referee were ended. When a referee has made his report, his powers and functions are as much ended, as are those of arbitrators when they have made their award, or of a jury when they have rendered their verdict and been discharged. The subsequent report of the referee was a nullity and ought to have been disregarded. There were some objections made by the plaintiffs to the original report of the referee, but the questions made, we think, do not arise upon the record. We are of opinion that judgment should have been rendered in accordance with the original report of the referee allowing Morton, as therein specified, the sum of seven hundred and eighty-seven dollars and seventy-one cents.

The judgment below is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded to the court below, with instructions to render judgment in accordance with the first report of the referee, allowing. Morton interest on the seven hundred and eighty-seven dollars and seventy-one cents, from the time of the report up to the time when judgment shall be rendered.
Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO
    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Form 10-K
  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.  Date: February 28, 2011
  /s/  Thomas
    K. Montag
  Thomas K. Montag
 Director and Chief Executive
    Officer
H. R. 4380

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4737 Mile

Stretch Drive in Holiday, Florida, as the ‘‘Sergeant First Class Paul Ray Smith

Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

4737 Mile Stretch Drive in Holiday, Florida, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘Sergeant First Class Paul Ray Smith Post Office

Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant

First Class Paul Ray Smith Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4176 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4176

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 122 West Elwood Avenue in Raeford, North Carolina, as the ``Bobby 
                Marshall Gentry Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 2004

  Mr. Hayes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 122 West Elwood Avenue in Raeford, North Carolina, as the ``Bobby 
                Marshall Gentry Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BOBBY MARSHALL GENTRY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 122 West Elwood Avenue in Raeford, North Carolina, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Bobby Marshall Gentry Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Bobby 
Marshall Gentry Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
```

Exhibit 99.2

                            **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cryocon, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q(SB) for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vaughn P. Griggs,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/Vaughn P. Griggs
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer

Date September 6, 2002
```
10627.

#### Winship *v.*The State.

Decided September 18, 1919.

Accusation of operating automobile while under'the influence of intoxicating liquor; from city court of Macon—Judge G-uerry. May 13, 1919.

*Roland Ellis, O. A. Glawson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Will Gunn, solicitor,*contra.

Broyles, P. J.

1. The excerpts from the charge of the court, complained of in the first two special grounds of the motion for a new trial, when considered in connection with the entire charge and the facts of the ease, are not erroneous.

2. In the light of the notes of the judge, qualifying his approval of the remaining special grounds of the motion for a new trial, the other assignments of error are without merit.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and, having been approved by the judge, this court is without authority to set it aside.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodioorth and Stephens, JJ., eoneur.*