alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services
 Title 5, U.S.C. Section 4314(c)(4) of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, Public Law 95-454, requires that the 
                    ( print page 68885)
                    appointment of Performance Review Board Members be published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . The following persons may be named to serve on the Performance Review Boards or Panels, which oversee the evaluation of performance appraisals of Senior Executive Service members of the Department of Health and Human Services. Employee last name
Employee first nameDowning
GregoryFoster
RobertGabriel
EdwardGentile
JohnGibson
VentrisGill
JohnGracia
NadineGunderson
NancyHaseltine
AmyMcCabe
WilliamMcDaniel
EileenNovy
StevePotts
OliverSeshamani
MeenaTeti
CatherineWeber
MarkZiegler-Ragland
Cheryl
 Date: November 14, 2014. John W. Gill, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Human Resources.


[FR Doc. 2014-27405 Filed 11-17-14; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 4151-17-P
**Exhibit 10(h)**

 

**SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF TRUSTEES’ COMPENSATION**

** **

The compensation paid toeach Individual Trustee and the Corporate Trustee is set forth in the Amendmentto the Agreement of Trust, dated as of October 25, 1982 (the “Amendment”).  The Amendment is filed as Exhibit 3(a) tothe Form 10-K.

 

Pursuant to the Amendment,each Individual Trustee receives at least $20,000 in annual compensation forservices as Trustee.  Each year, annualTrustee compensation is adjusted up or down (but not below $20,000) inaccordance with changes from the November 1981 level of 295.5 (the “1981Escalation Level”) in the All Commodities Producer Price Index (with 1967 = 100as a base).  The All Commodities ProducerPrice Index is published by the U.S. Department of Labor.  The adjustment is made at the end of eachfiscal year and is calculated on the basis of the proportion between (a) thelevel of such index for the November preceding the end of such fiscalyear, and (b) the 1981 Escalation Level. Each of the Individual Trustees received $36,340 in cash compensationfor services to the Trust during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008.

 

Also pursuant to theAmendment, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as the Corporate Trustee,receives annual compensation in an amount equal to the greater of (i) $20,000,or such other amount determined in accordance with the adjustments described inthe preceding paragraph, or (ii) one quarter of one percent (1/4 of 1%) ofthe Trust Moneys, exclusive of proceeds of sale of any part of the Trust Estate(as such terms are defined in the Agreement of Trust), received by the Trusteesand distributed to Trust Unitholders. The Corporate Trustee received $36,340 in cash compensation pursuant tothis provision for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008.

 

Additionally, each year the Corporate Trustee receives$62,500 (or more, if unanimously approved by the Individual Trustees) to coverclerical and administrative services to Mesabi Trust other than servicescustomarily performed by a registrar or transfer agent.  In fiscal year 2008, the Trust paid theCorporate Trustee $62,500 for such services.

 

----
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3975

To authorize States, in the event of inadequate Federal funding under part 

B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, to waive certain 

requirements of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2004

Mr. BALLANCE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To authorize States, in the event of inadequate Federal funding under part B of the Individuals with Disabilities 

Education Act, to waive certain requirements of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, and 

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Respecting Our Lead5 ers in Education Model Act of 2004’’ or ‘‘ROLE Model 

6 Act of 2004’’. 
2

•HR 3975 IH 

1 SEC. 2. FULL FUNDING OF PART B OF THE INDIVIDUALS 

2 WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT. 

3 (a) WAIVER AUTHORITY.—Subject to subsection (c), 

4 section 1116(b) of the Elementary and Secondary Edu5 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6316(b)) (relating to the 

6 identification of schools for school improvement, corrective 

7 action, or restructuring) shall not apply in a State if—

8 (1) for any fiscal year the Federal Government 

9 appropriates for the purpose of carrying out part B 

10 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 

11 (20 U.S.C. 1411 et seq.) an amount that is less than 

12 the amount determined under subsection (b); and 

13 (2) the State chooses to waive the application of 

14 such section 1116(b). 

15 (b) AMOUNT.—The amount referred to in subsection 

16 (a)(1) is the product of—

17 (1) the number of children with disabilities in 

18 all States who are receiving special education and re19 lated services—

20 (A) aged 3 through 5 if the State is eligi21 ble for a grant under section 619; and 

22 (B) aged 6 through 21; and 

23 (2) 40 percent of the average per-pupil expendi24 ture in public elementary and secondary schools in 

25 the United States. 
3

•HR 3975 IH 

1 (c) LIMITATION.—For any fiscal year described in 

2 subsection (a)(1), a State may waive the application of 

3 section 1116(b) of the Elementary and Secondary Edu4 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6316(b)) for not more than 

5 3 consecutive school years, beginning with the school year 

6 that commences during the fiscal year involved. 

7 (d) CONTINUED FUNDING.—A State’s decision under 

8 this section to waive the provisions of section 1116(b) of 

9 the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 

10 U.S.C. 6316(b)) shall not affect the State’s eligibility for, 

11 or receipt of, funds under such Act. 

12 (e) STATE.—For purposes of this section, the term 

13 ‘‘State’’ has the meaning given to that term in section 

14 9101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 

15 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801).

Æ
10816.

#### King *v.*The State.

Decided November 4, 1919.

Broyles, C. J.

1. None of the excerpts from the charge of the court complained of, when considered in connection with the charge as a whole, shows cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

2. Under the facts of the ease, the court did not err in denying the defendant's motion for a mistrial.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ.} concur.*

*349Indictment for larceny of horse; from Bibb superior court— Judge Mathews. July 17, 1919.

*John R. Cooper, W. 0. Cooper Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*John P. Ross, solicitor-general,*contra.
NVLAP LAB BULLETIN NUMBER: LB-113-2019 PAGE: 1 of 2

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology

National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

ISSUE DATE:

September 20, 2019

LAB BULLETIN NUMBER: LB-113-2019

LAP: Calibration

SUBJECT: Release of NIST Handbook 150-2, 2019 Edition

NIST Handbook 150-2, which represents the technical requirements for the accreditation of 

laboratories under the NVLAP Calibration Laboratory Accreditation Program, has been revised. 

The new edition was revised with the participation of NIST technical experts for the represented 

calibration parameters.

The following are the primary changes that have been made with this revision of 

Handbook 150-2:

• The numbering has been updated to reflect that used by ISO/IEC 17025:2017, General 

requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.

• The prior “rule of thumb” that at a minimum, laboratories shall participate in proficiency 

testing in each field of calibration published on their scope at leave once every four years, 

has been formalized as a requirement.

• A requirement has been added that when the management system of a laboratory does not 

follow the numbering in ISO/IEC 17025:2017, the laboratory will provide a mapping 

between the two numbering systems (crosswalk).

• Wording changes for clarification have been made where needed.

• Annexes have been included to elaborate on technical requirements for represented 

calibration parameters. These are included in the associated checklist used during the onsite assessment.

Implementation of the proficiency testing interval requirement shall be reflected in the 

proficiency testing plan within 60 days of the issuance of this lab bulletin.

Implementation of the crosswalk, when applicable, shall be for assessments occurring 60 days 

from the date of issuance of this lab bulletin.

The 2019 edition of NIST Handbook 150-2 supersedes and replaces the 2016 edition. It is 

available for downloading (PDF format) from the NVLAP website http://www.nist.gov/nvlap

under NVLAP Program-Specific Handbooks.

The NIST Handbook 150-2 Checklist has also been updated and posted on the NVLAP website 
NVLAP LAB BULLETIN NUMBER: LB-113-2019 PAGE: 2 of 2

under Accreditation Programs/Calibration/Requirements Documents. Checklists covering 

individual annexes are now included in the HB 150-2 Checklist. Assessors will use these

sections of the checklist only if there are requirements pertaining to your specific scope of 

accreditation.

Additional annexes will be added as they become available.

Technical guidance and information will be made available on the Calibration Program page of 

the NVLAP website <https://www.nist.gov/nvlap/calibration-lap/calibration-programdescription>. Such guidance and information will not contain additional requirements.

Please contact your program manager for questions concerning the revised handbook or 

requirements for accreditation.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  William  W.R. Elder, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report  of  Genus,  Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30,
2003  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report  on  Form  10-Q  fairly  presents  in all material respects the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Genus,  Inc.


                                              By:  /s/  William  W.R.  Elder
                                                 ---------------------------
                                              Name:  William  W.R.  Elder
                                              Title:   Chief Executive Officer

I,  Shum  Mukherjee,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report  of  Genus,  Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30,
2003  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report  on  Form  10-Q  fairly  presents  in all material respects the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Genus,  Inc.

                                              By:  /s/  Shum  Mukherjee
                                                 ---------------------------
                                              Name:  Shum  Mukherjee
                                              Title:   Chief Financial Officer



<PAGE>
<PAGE>




                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


         I, Lorie M. Guerrera, Chief Accounting Officer of Cordia Corporation
(the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the period March 31, 2003 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


                                           By: Lorie M. Guerrera
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Lorie M. Guerrera
                                              Chief Accounting Officer

May 15, 2003



--------------
*    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
     been provided to Cordia Corporation and will be retained by Cordia
     Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its
     staff upon request.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JUNE 11, 2012

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 11-15250 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00493-VMC-TBM-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALMA BORJA,

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Middle District of Florida

 ________________________

(June 11, 2012)

Before HULL, MARCUS and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Jorge Leon Chalela, appointed counsel for Alma Borja, has filed a motion to
withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit

of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record

reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED

and Borja’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
balance  sheet of CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd. at June 30, 2000 and its statement of
income  for the six  months  then  ended and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference  to the Form 10-Q of CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd. for the six months ended
June 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         1,007,585
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  251,920
<ALLOWANCES>                                   199,113
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         18,327,471
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,446,102
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 29,667,348
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     28,548,092
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   29,667,348
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,296,645
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  390,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,167,488
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,167,488
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,167,488
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0

<FN>
<F1> Due to the nature of its  industry,  CNL Income Fund VI,  Ltd.  has an
unclassified  balance  sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>

</TABLE>
AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                         STRATFORD AMERICAN CORPORATION


                  Article  IV,  Section 1 of the  Articles of  Incorporation  is
amended to read in its entirety as follows:


                                      "IV.
                               AUTHORIZED CAPITAL

                  1. Aggregate Capital. The aggregate number of shares which the
corporation  shall  have  authority  to  issue  is  One  Hundred  Fifty  Million
(150,000,000) consisting of One Hundred Million (100,000,000) common shares, one
cent  ($0.01) par value (the "Common  Stock"),  and Fifty  Million  (50,000,000)
preferred  shares,  one cent ($0.01) par value.  Each fifteen (15) shares of the
Corporation's Common Stock issued as of the date and time immediately  following
the filing of this  Amendment  to the  Articles  of  Incorporation  (the  "Split
Effective  Date") shall be  automatically  changed and  reclassified,  as of the
Split  Effective Date and without  further  action,  into one (1) fully paid and
nonassessable share of the Corporation's Common Stock;  provided,  however, that
any fractional  interest resulting from such change and classification  shall be
rounded upward to the nearest whole share."

                                       13
##### 



Exhibit 31.1Section 302 Certification I, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that: I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing
distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered by
this annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-10;  1.
    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;  2.
    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to
the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, for
inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;  3.
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trustee
under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and the
annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the
reports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;
and  4.
    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trustee
and the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth in
the pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A. Date: March 29, 2005 By: /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale
Name: Ellen Z. Lamale
Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
10512.

#### White *v.*The State.

Decided July 16, 1919.

Accusation of misdemeanor; Nom city court of Carrollton— Judge Beall. April 7, 1919.

*John W. Moore, Boykin & Boykin,*for plaintiff in error.

*Willie Smith, solicitor,*contra.

Bboyles, P. J.

1. Before a tenant can legally be convicted, under sections 720 and 721 of the Penal Code (1910), of defrauding his landlord, it must appear from the evidence that the sale of the crops by the tenant was without the consent of the landlord; that loss to the landlord resulted from the sale; and that the tenant made the sale with intent to defraud the landlord. Unless all three of these essential elements of the offense are shown, the defendant’s conviction is unauthorized. *Morrison*v. *State,*111 *Ga.*642 (36 S. E. 902); *Reece*v. *State, 5 Ga. App.*663 (63 S. E. 670); *Thompson*v. *State,*12 *Ga. App.*201 (76 S. E. 1072).

2. Under the above ruling, and the facts of the instant case as disclosed by the record, the defendant’s conviction was unauthorized, and the court erred in refusing to grant a new trial.

3. It is unnecessary to consider the amendment to the motion for a new trial. *Judgment reversed.*

*Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                         164,301
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               190,542
<PP&E>                                       3,821,294
<DEPRECIATION>                                 282,269
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,779,567
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,353,501
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,762
<OTHER-SE>                                     417,304
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,779,567
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,099,649
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   151
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             146,328
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,246,128)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,246,128)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,246,128)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>