alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
        10.32

      Schedule
        Identifying Similar Allonges

      


      


      Certain
        lenders of debt that was outstanding as of the dates set forth below have
        agreed
        to extend the respective maturity dates of their loans until June 30, 2006,
        except as otherwise indicated, pursuant to Allonges substantially similar
        to the
        Form of Allonge set forth in Exhibit 10.31.

      


      
        	
                 

                Date
                  of Issuance

              	 	
                 

                Amount

              	 	
                Original

                Maturity
                  Date

              
	
                November
                  7, 2003

              	 	
                $25,000

              	 	
                November
                  7, 2004

              
	
                February
                  3, 2004

              	 	
                $25,000

              	 	
                February
                  3, 2005

              
	
                February
                  7, 2004

              	 	
                $25,000

              	 	
                February
                  7, 2005

              
	
                February
                  9, 2004

              	 	
                $25,000

              	 	
                February
                  9, 2005

              
	
                March
                  22, 2004

              	 	
                $25,000

              	 	
                March
                  22, 2005

              
	
                March
                  23, 2004

              	 	
                $75,000

              	 	
                March
                  23, 2005

              
	
                March
                  23, 2004

              	 	
                $25,000

              	 	
                March
                  23, 2005

              
	
                May
                  28, 2004

              	 	
                $50,000

              	 	
                May
                  28, 2005

              
	
                May
                  31, 2004

              	 	
                $10,000

              	 	
                May
                  31, 2005

              
	
                June
                  10, 2004

              	 	
                $15,000

              	 	
                June
                  10, 2005

              
	
                June
                  25, 2004

              	 	
                $500,000

              	 	
                June
                  25, 2005

              
	
                August
                  16, 2005

              	 	
                $45,000 

              	 	
                September
                  16, 2005(1)

              


      

      


      ____________

      (1)    Extended
        until December 30, 2005
Order entered September 27, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00870-CR

No. 05-16-00877-CR

ARCHIE WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court

Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 2-15-162, 2-16-0307

ORDER

Appellant’s September 21, 2016 pro se motion seeking appointment of new counsel is 

before the Court.

Because cause no. 05-16-00870-CR has been abated, the Court will take no action on 

appellant’s motion in that cause.

In cause no. 05-16-00877-CR, appellant’s motion is DENIED.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4

                  [H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC. LETTERHEAD]

                                 August 7, 1998

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


         We hereby consent to (i) the incorporation by reference in the
Prospectus (the "Prospectus") constituting a part of the Registration Statement
on Form S-3 filed by Queen Sand Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), under the Securities Act of 1933, of information contained in our
reserve reports relating to the proved oil and natural gas reserves and future
net revenues of oil and natural gas reserves of the Company as of June 30, 1997
(other than with respect to the Property Acquisitions (as defined in the
Prospectus)) and December 31, 1997 (other than with respect to the Morgan
Properties (as defined in the Prospectus)) and all references to such report
letters and/or this firm in such Prospectus and (ii) further consent to our
being named as an expert therein in the section titled "Experts."


                                        H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

                                           By: /s/ Robert J. Naas               
                                              --------------------------------
                                           Name: Robert J. Naas
                                           Title: Executive Vice President
NVLAP LAB BULLETIN NUMBER: LB-133-2020 PAGE 1 of 1

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National 

Institute of Standards and Technology National

Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

ISSUE DATE:

November 9, 2020

LAB BULLETIN

NUMBER: LB-133-2020

LAP: Carpet and Carpet 

Cushion

SUBJECT: Addition of Synthetic Turf Testing to Carpet and Carpet Cushion LAP

The purpose of this bulletin is to notify laboratories that synthetic turf test methods have been 

added to the Carpet and Carpet Cushion (CCC) LAP.

Effective immediately, NVLAP is accrediting for synthetic turf testing in the Carpet and Carpet 

Cushion LAP. These test methods are included in the NIWS lab portal. 

Requirements

A laboratory seeking to add synthetic turf testing must undergo an onsite assessment. This may be 

done at a scheduled renewal assessment, or at an interim assessment for a fee. If doing so at a

scheduled renewal assessment, please notify the NVLAP CCC program manager and the assessor 

(if assigned) as soon as possible so an adjustment to the assessment schedule can be made. If 

choosing to have an additional assessment, please contact the CCC program manager to arrange 

the assessment.

A laboratory seeking to add synthetic surf testing methods to its scope may submit the request, 

along with supporting documentation, through the NIWS lab portal to the CCC program manager. 

If you have any questions, please contact the CCC program manager, Tim Rasinski, 

timothy.rasinski@nist.gov.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
   
     We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to
the use of our reports dated February 5, 1998, in the Form S-1 Registration
Statement and related Prospectus of Thermadyne Holdings Corporation, to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about August 4, 1998.
    
 
                                            /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Orange County, California
   
August 4, 1998
Form of Stock Certificate



 

 
 Exhibit 4.1 
 CapitalSouth Bancorp 
 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

 COMMON STOCK 
 NUMBER 
 CS 
 SHARES 
 CUSIP 14056A 10 1 
 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS 
 THIS CERTIFIES that 
 SPECIMEN 
 is the owner of 
 FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK. PAR VALUE $1.00 PER SHARE OF 
 CapitalSouth Bancorp

 Transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this
Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers and its Corporate seal to be hereunto affixed. 
 DATED: 
 COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED 
 REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER COMPANY 
 TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR 
 BY 
 CAROL W. MARSH, SECRETARY 
 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 
 W. DAN PUCKETT, CHAIRMAN
#### Peter Turpin *v.*Commonwealth.

Removal of Causes — Trial of Negro.

A motion to transfer a criminal case against a negro pending in tlie county court tci tlie United States Court, was held properly overruled, since jurisdiction was in the state court.

APPEAL. FROM JESSAMINE CIRCUIT COURT.

March 13, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay :

If the United States Courts ever had jurisdiction to try persons charged with offenses against the laws of Kentucky, a *560question not necessary to decide, this court knows judicially that since the passage of the act of assembly making negroes competent witnesses, the United States District Court in this state has refused to entertain jurisdiction of indictments (found by grand juries in the state courts) against negroes for such offenses.

If the motion in this case to transfer to the federal court had prevailed, the prosecution would undoubtedly have been remanded to the state court by that tribunal. It follows, therefore, that no matter what may have been the proper construction of the law “aforetime,” that the motion in this case did not oust the Jessamine 'Circuit Court of its jurisdiction.

Judgment *affirmed.*

-, *for appellee.*
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 3.9.2



                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                                  C.W.A., INC.


                 C.W.A., Nc. a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY.

                 FIRST:  That the Board of Directors of said corporation, by
the unanimous written consent of its members, filed with the minutes of the
board adopted a resolution proposing and declaring advisable the following
amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation:

                 RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of C.W.A.,
         Inc. be amended by changing the Articles thereof numbered "1" and "3"
         so that, as amended, said Articles shall be and read as follows:

                 "1.      The name of the corporation is WFIL, INC.

                 "3.      To purchase, own and operate radio and television
         broadcast stations and to be a licensee of the Federal Communications
         Commission.

                 To engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations
may be organized under the General Corporation Law of Delaware."
<PAGE>   2
                 SECOND:  That in lieu of a meeting and vote of stockholders,
the sole corporate stockholder has given its written consent to said amendment
in accordance with the provisions of Section 228 of The General Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware.

                 THIRD:  That the aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in
accordance with the applicable provisions of Sections 242 and 228 of The
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

                 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said C.W.A., Inc., has caused its
corporated seal to be hereunto affixed and this certificate to be signed by
Donald A. Pels, its President, and attested by John D. Diamond, its Secretary,
this 20th day of October, 1970.

                                        C.W.A., INC.

                                        By:
                                           ------------------------------
                                                    President

(CORPORATE SEAL)

ATTEST:

By:
   ------------------------
         Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,692
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,201
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,920
<PP&E>                                         144,779
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,997
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 120,098
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,408
<BONDS>                                         32,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,944
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,028
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   120,098
<SALES>                                          9,582
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,613
<CGS>                                            5,754
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,754
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   521
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 432
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,226
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,226
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4288

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the exemption 

amounts for individuals under the alternative minimum tax. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2004

Mr. ISRAEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the exemption amounts for individuals under the alternative minimum tax.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN EXEMPTION AMOUNTS FOR INDI4 VIDUALS UNDER ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM 

5 TAX. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 55(d) of 

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended—

8 (1) by striking ‘‘$45,000 ($58,000 in the case 

9 of taxable years beginning in 2003 and 2004)’’ and 

10 inserting ‘‘$100,000’’, and 
2

•HR 4288 IH 

1 (2) by striking ‘‘$33,750 ($40,250 in the case 

2 of taxable years beginning in 2003 and 2004)’’ and 

3 inserting ‘‘75 percent of the dollar amount applica4 ble under subparagraph (A)’’. 

5 (b) INCREASE IN THRESHOLD FOR PHASING OUT

6 EXEMPTION AMOUNT.—Subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) 

7 of section 55(d)(3) of such Code are amended to read as 

8 follows: 

9 ‘‘(A) $250,000 in the case of a taxpayer 

10 described in paragraph (1)(A) or (2), and 

11 ‘‘(B) 50 percent of the dollar amount ap12 plicable under subparagraph (A) in the case of 

13 a taxpayer described in subparagraph (B), (C), 

14 or (D) of paragraph (1).’’

15 (c) INCREASE IN RATE OF PHASE-OUT OF EXEMP16 TION AMOUNT.—Paragraph (3) of section 55(d) of such 

17 Code is amended by striking ‘‘25 percent’’ and inserting 

18 ‘‘50 percent’’. 

19 (d) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT OF EXEMPTION AND

20 THRESHOLD AMOUNTS.—Subsection (d) of section 55 of 

21 such Code is amended by adding at the end the following 

22 new paragraph: 

23 ‘‘(4) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT OF EXEMPTION

24 AND THRESHOLD AMOUNTS FOR INDIVIDUALS.—In 

25 the case of any taxable year beginning in a calendar 
3

•HR 4288 IH 

1 year after 2005, each of the dollar amounts set forth 

2 in paragraphs (1)(A) and (3)(A) shall be increased 

3 by an amount equal to—

4 ‘‘(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

5 ‘‘(B) the cost-of-living adjustment deter6 mined under section 1(f)(3) for such calendar 

7 year by substituting ‘calendar year 2004’ for 

8 ‘calendar year 1992’ in subparagraph (B) 

9 thereof. 

10 If any amount as adjusted under the preceding sentence 

11 is not a multiple of $1,000, such amount shall be rounded 

12 to the nearest multiple of $1,000.’’. 

13 (e) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

15 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

16 (f) COORDINATION WITH SUNSET OF BENEFITS.—

17 Title IX of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Rec18 onciliation Act of 2001 shall not apply to the amendments 

19 made by this section.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-2317

THOMAS DARBY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ORANGEBURG, City of; D ALLEN OTT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (CA-01-4184-22BD-5)

Submitted: January 29, 2004 Decided: February 4, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Darby, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Coleman Jones, BOGOSLOW,

JONES, STEPHENS & DUFFIE, P.A., Walterboro, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Darby seeks to appeal the district court’s order

adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation to

dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failing to allege

a deprivation of a federal right. We dismiss the appeal for lack

of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory

and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S.

257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220,

229 (1960)). 

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on

November 1, 2002. The notice of appeal was filed on October 20,

2003. Because Darby failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to

obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
10908.

#### Colvin *v.*Colvin.

Decided December 16, 1919.

Eviction; from Richmond superior court—Judge Henry C. Hammond. September 1, 1919.

*Isaac 8. Peebles Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*8am F. Garlington,*contra.

Smith, J.

Where a son acquired the legal title to certain described lands while he together with his wife and mother was living on the premises, and the mother made to him a quitclaim deed to any interest she might have in the premises, and the son permitted her to continue to live in the house with him, and after his death the property was set apart to his widow as a year’s support, the mother was a tenant at sufferance both as to her son and his widow, who succeeded to the title after the death of her husband, and a summary remedy as provided for by section 5385 of the Civil Code of 1910 was a proper proceeding to evict her from the premises. The trial court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff. *Kimbrough*v. *Kimbrough,*99 *Ga.*134 (25 S. E. 176); *Stanley*v. *Stembridge,*140 *Ga.*750 (79 S. E. 842).

This ruling does not conflict with that made in *Edwards*v. *Blackshear,*ante, 622 (101 S. E. 585), as the facts are distinguishable.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.*
4/25/22, 12:30 PM blob:https://www.fdms.gov/920f9ace-6e30-4e61-b9ed-27aa24bd5b57

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 4/25/22 12:30 PM

Received: April 21, 2022

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. l28-serr-jgnu

Comments Due: April 25, 2022

Submission Type: Web

Docket: NIST-2022-0001

Evaluating and Improving NIST Cybersecurity Resources: The Cybersecurity Framework and

Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management

Comment On: NIST-2022-0001-0001

RFI-2022-03642

Document: NIST-2022-0001-DRAFT-0024

Comment on FR Doc # N/A

Submitter Information

Email:

Organization: Information Age Ltd.

General Comment

DMARC and SPF / DKIM use should be included in the standard. This enables the recipient to validate

the source. Email services should report to anomalies to the forensic (ruf) address specified.

blob:https://www.fdms.gov/920f9ace-6e30-4e61-b9ed-27aa24bd5b57 1/1
4/25/22, 12:32 PM blob:https://www.fdms.gov/c4519e9d-f685-4e1f-bf88-b77725e734b6

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 4/25/22 12:32 PM

Received: April 21, 2022

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. l28-tlpd-vg9l

Comments Due: April 25, 2022

Submission Type: Web

Docket: NIST-2022-0001

Evaluating and Improving NIST Cybersecurity Resources: The Cybersecurity Framework and

Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management

Comment On: NIST-2022-0001-0001

RFI-2022-03642

Document: NIST-2022-0001-DRAFT-0025

Comment on FR Doc # N/A

Submitter Information

Email:

Organization: Information Age Ltd.

General Comment

Testing or checking for compliance with sound security practices is not achievable for many individuals,

charities and other small organisations. They are, as a result open to exploitation. Can the framework

include the concept of model architectures, for end user devices and for services so that these

organisations can acquire a device or purchase a services that they know would be reasonable safe. For

end user devices a model architecture would effectively be a device built using a public, assured "Gold

Build". It may be something that Organisations such as CIS and OWASP could then publish or the

vendors, Microsoft, Apple, Google could provide?

blob:https://www.fdms.gov/c4519e9d-f685-4e1f-bf88-b77725e734b6 1/1