alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          96,198                 241,348
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  183,049                 207,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               293,615                 464,433
<PP&E>                                      10,517,265               9,935,953
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,767,865               5,857,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,043,015               4,542,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          601,434                 443,131
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       811,644                 811,644
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,361,937               1,787,711
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,043,015               4,542,486
<SALES>                                      1,503,623               2,090,117
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,516,399               2,108,459
<CGS>                                          644,563                 663,525
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  644,563                 663,525
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,297,610               3,138,160
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             151,069                 137,012
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (425,774)             (1,693,226)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0               (369,569)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (425,774)             (1,323,657)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (425,774)             (1,323,657)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.26)                  (0.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)                  (0.83)


</TABLE>
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Institute of Standards and Technology 

 National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

ISSUE DATE:

February 7, 2007 

NUMBER: LB-23-2007 LAB BULLETIN 

LAP: Asbestos TEM 

SUBJECT: Release of NIST Handbook 150-13, 2006 Edition 

NIST Handbook 150-13, which presents the technical requirements and guidance for the accreditation of 

laboratories under the NVLAP Airborne Asbestos Analysis Program, has been revised. The new edition 

incorporates changes resulting from the release of NIST Handbook 150:2006, NVLAP Procedures and 

General Requirements, and was revised with the participation of technical experts in the field of airborne 

asbestos analysis. The following main changes have been made with respect to the previous edition: 

• references to applicable standards and guidance documents have been updated; 

• Lab Bulletin LB-7-2002, previously issued for clarification, has been incorporated into this edition 

of the handbook; 

• on-site assessment checklists and the test method selection list are no longer included in order that 

they may be provided as separate documents, which may be updated at different intervals than the 

handbook; 

• the body of the handbook has been restructured to conform with internationally accepted rules for 

the structure and drafting of standards, where appropriate, to promote ease of use and 

understanding; 

• Annex A (normative) and Annex B (informative) have been added. 

The 2006 edition of NIST Handbook 150-13 supersedes and replaces the 1995 edition. It is available for 

downloading (Adobe PDF format) from the NVLAP web site at: 

<http://ts.nist.gov/Standards/Accreditation/upload/NIST-HB-150-13-2006.pdf>. If you do not have 

Internet access, please contact NVLAP and specify whether you would like a paper copy of the handbook 

mailed to you or an Adobe PDF version e-mailed to you. 

This is also a reminder of the NVLAP transition to the accreditation requirements of ISO/IEC 

17025:2005, as contained in NIST Handbook 150: 2006. All on-site assessments are conducted against 

the accreditation requirements as published in NIST Handbook 150:2006 and the corresponding NIST 

Handbook 150 Checklist. Accredited laboratories have 30 days after an on-site assessment to resolve 

nonconformities to the new requirements. 

Questions concerning the revised handbook or requirements for accreditation should be directed to 

Thomas R. Davis at 301-975-6499, or <thomas.davis@nist.gov> or Hazel M. Richmond at 301-975-

3024, or <hazel.richmond@nist.gov>. 

NVLAP LAB BULLETIN NUMBER: LB-23-2007 PAGE: 1 of 1
#### Clarence W. OTIS et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF MEMPHIS PARK COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 77-1740.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Argued Jan. 28, 1980.

Decided Feb. 21, 1980.

G. Philip Arnold, Ratner, Sugarmon, Lucas, Salky & Henderson, Memphis, Tenn., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Ross B. Clark, II, Clifford D. Pierce, Jr., City Atty., J. Heiskell Weatherford, Canada, Russell & Turner, Memphis, Tenn., for defendant-appellee.

Before EDWARDS, Chief Judge, LIVELY, Circuit Judge, and WISEMAN,* District Judge.

*

 Honorable Thomas A. Wiseman, Jr., United States District Judge for the Middle District of Tennessee, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

The record in this case discloses ample support for the findings of the District Judge’s determining that plaintiffs had established a class and that defendantappellee was guilty of racial discrimination in the hiring of temporary bricklayers, and for his entry of injunctive relief pertaining to future hiring practices and his holding that attorney’s fees should be awarded.

Further, our inspection of the record requires vacation of those portions of the District Judge’s orders denying a hearing on back pay and assessing attorney’s fees, and a remand of this case for further consideration of back pay and attorney’s fees. *See Head v. Timken Roller Bearing Co.,*486 F.2d 870 (6th Cir. 1973); *Meadows v. Ford Motor Co.,*510 F.2d 939 (6th Cir. 1975), and *Northcross v. Board of Education,*611 F.2d 624 (6th Cir. 1979).

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed in part and vacated in part.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Lawrence H. Wolfe, Chief Executive Officer of Mera Pharmaceuticals, certify that (1) Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 3 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30,, 2011 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.





Date:   July 25, 2012





/s/ Lawrence H. Wolfe


----------------------------------------


Lawrence H. Wolfe


Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
#### John Moss and Wife *v.*Geo. H. Pendleton and Others.

Railroads — Killing Animals — Liability.

A railroad company was not held liable for the killing of -a horse by its train on the 28th of July, 1869, by the careless- and negligent running of the -train, since at that -time there was no statutory liability for such act, and such liability -did not exist at common law.

APPEAL FROM KENTON CIRCUIT COURT.

December 26, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The averment upon which appellants seek t-o recover the value of the horse alleged to have been killed, is that the appellees “by their agents and servants, engineers and conductors, carelessly and negligently running a train of cars along, and' upon the track of said road, in said county of Kenton, ran against and over and killed unlawfully and wrongfully one black gelding horse about nine years old and of the value of $110.

At common law the appellees were not liable for injuries to stock straying upon their track, inflicted by their trains, unless such injuries were the result of the willful negligence or reckless conduct of those in charge of the train-. *Louisville and Frankfort R. Co. v. Ballard, 2*Metcalfe 183; *O’Bannon v. L. C. & L. R. Co.,*8 Bush 348.

*162
      *C. H. Moor, for appellants.*

*Benton, for appellees.*

By an act approved December *7,*1869, railroad companies were made liable for such injuries when they should result from negligence or carelessness. Session Acts 1869-70, page 1.

Appellants allege that their horse was killed on the 28th of July, 1869, four months before the passage of this act. Their petition, therefore, presented *no*cause of action; for this .reason it is not necessary that other questions discussed by counsel should be considered.

Judgment *affirmed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<MULTIPLIER>    1

<S>                                           <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  Jun-30-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       6-mos
<CASH>                                            296,943
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       2,641
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  299,584
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    233,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   0
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                        233,768
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      233,768
<SALES>                                            59,608
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   74,870
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      32,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   69,899
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 88,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   222,878
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               222,878
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      222,878
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                            2,173,784
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                     1,278,984
<ALLOWANCES>                         30,000
<INVENTORY>                       1,474,955
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  5,170,799
<PP&E>                            9,424,536
<DEPRECIATION>                    3,397,917
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   12,410,569
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             1,277,343
<BONDS>                           2,368,677
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                       2,500,000
<COMMON>                            101,914
<OTHER-SE>                        7,100,150
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     12,410,569
<SALES>                          11,198,174
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 11,198,174
<CGS>                             7,918,440
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     7,918,440
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  3,338,253
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  146,620
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (95,915)
<INCOME-TAX>                          4,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (99,915)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        (99,915)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.02)



</TABLE>
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*Fishack, Appellee.

*371(No. 4330

Decided December 20, 1948.)

*Mr. Joel 8. Rhinefort,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. John J. McCarthy,*for appellant.

*Mr. Jesse S. Heslip,*for appellee.

Carpenter, J.

In the Municipal Court of Toledo, the defendant was convicted and sentenced on. a charge of petit larceny. He filed a notice of appeal on questions of law to the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas county. That court reversed the conviction and discharged the defendant. From that judgment, the state appealed to this court on questions of law, and assigns as error that the defendant’s notice of appeal to the Common Pleas Court was not filed in time to give that court jurisdiction.

The record shows that defendant’s motion for a new trial was overruled and he was sentenced February 7, 1948. On March 20,1948, his notice of appeal was filed.

Section 1579-307, Genera] Code, a part of the Toledo Municipal Court Act, provides that appeals on questions of law from that court “in both civil and criminal cases may be prosecuted to the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas county * * * in the same manner and under the same conditions * * * as provided by law for appeals on questions of law from the Court of Common Pleas to the Court of Appeals.”

*372Section 13459-4, General Code, says that in that procedure an “appeal * # * may be filed as a matter of right within thirty days after sentence and judgment”; after thirty days, “only by leave of the court or two of the judges thereof.”

No such leave is shown by this record.

Forty-one days having intervened between the sentence and the notice of appeal, it was too late and the Common Pleas Court, for want of jurisdiction, should have dismissed the appeal. Such being the state of the record, the judgment of reversal must be set aside and the cause remanded to the Municipal Court for execution.of sentence.

*Judgment reversed and cause remanded.*

Conn and Fess, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 435 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 435

              For the relief of Robert and Verda Shatusky.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2003

  Mr. Stupak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              For the relief of Robert and Verda Shatusky.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENTITLEMENT TO SUPPLEMENTAL ANNUITY, SURVIVOR BENEFITS, AND 
              OTHER PAYMENTS UNDER RAILROAD RETIREMENT ACT OF 1974.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of the Railroad Retirement Act of 
1974 (45 U.S.C. 231 et seq.), Robert Shatusky, of Menominee, Michigan, 
shall be deemed to have had a current connection with the railroad 
industry at the time that his annuity under section 2(a)(1) of such Act 
began to accrue.
    (b) Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall apply to any month that 
begins more than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF PAST SUPPLEMENTAL ANNUITY BENEFITS.

     The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Robert Shatusky of Menominee, 
Michigan, a sum that equals the total amount of any supplemental 
annuity payments to which Robert Shatusky would have been entitled 
under section 2(b) of the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 (45 U.S.C. 
231a(b)) if section 1(a) of this Act applied to the period beginning on 
the date on which his annuity under section 2(a)(1) of the Railroad 
Retirement Act of 1974 (45 U.S.C. 231a(a)(1)) began to accrue and 
ending on the last day of the month preceding the 1st month to which 
section 1(a) of this Act applies.

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON AGENT AND ATTORNEY FEES.

     It shall be unlawful for an amount exceeding 10 percent of the 
payment required by section 2 to be paid to or received by any agent or 
attorney for any service rendered in connection with the payment. Any 
person who violates this section shall be guilty of an infraction and 
shall be subject to a fine in the amount provided in title 18, United 
States Code.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                          75,124
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,131
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,605
<PP&E>                                       3,881,839
<DEPRECIATION>                                 353,753
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,742,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,960,365
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,515
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,659,660
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,742,824
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  882,263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (33,419)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (915,682)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (915,682)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (951,682)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM WORLDCOM,
INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         221,879
<SECURITIES>                                   126,634
<RECEIVABLES>                                  747,184
<ALLOWANCES>                                    66,695
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,172,570
<PP&E>                                       2,352,960
<DEPRECIATION>                                 376,539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,492,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          923,100
<BONDS>                                      3,591,081
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,573
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,703,328
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,492,316
<SALES>                                      3,276,417
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,276,417
<CGS>                                        1,782,468
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,051,766
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (18,653)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                42,422
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             187,281
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 56,023
<INCOME-TAX>                                   130,015
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (73,992)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (24,434)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (99,286)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)
        

</TABLE>