alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony E. Applebaum, Chief Executive Officer of Mera Pharmaceuticals,
certify that (1) Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
January 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 3 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2006 fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of Mera
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Date:   March 13, 2006

/s/ ANTHONY E. APPLEBAUM
----------------------------------------
Anthony E. Applebaum
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Mera
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION

Principal Executive Officer & Principal Financial Officer

I, Wayne Robert Morgan, certify that:

1. 	I have reviewed this annual report of Laycor Ventures Corp.;

2. 	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. 	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. 	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) 	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) 	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) 	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. 	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) 	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) 	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: June 29, 2005 | /s/ Wayne Robert Morgan                                    
|------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------
|                    | Wayne Robert Morgan                                        
|                    | Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4397 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4397

     To temporarily exempt scrapping of naval vessels and Maritime 
 Administration vessels from certain environmental statutes governing 
                    handling of hazardous materials.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2004

 Mr. English introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on 
 Armed Services and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to 
      be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To temporarily exempt scrapping of naval vessels and Maritime 
 Administration vessels from certain environmental statutes governing 
                    handling of hazardous materials.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF SCRAPPING OF NAVAL VESSELS AND MARITIME 
              ADMINISTRATION VESSELS FROM ENVIRONMENTAL STATUTES 
              GOVERNING HANDLING OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.

    During the 6-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary of Defense may carry out scrapping of naval 
vessels and the Secretary of Transportation may carry out scrapping of 
Maritime Administration vessels, without regard to the following Acts:
            (1) The Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2601 et 
        seq.).
            (2) The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (42 
        U.S.C. 6901 et seq.).
            (3) The Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.).
            (4) The Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 
        et seq.).
                                 <all>
```
Evaluation of Latent Fingerprint 

Identification Technologies 

(ELFT) 

Michael Indovina 

IBPC 2010 
What Is ELFT? 

• A series of open technology evaluations focused 

on the automated* (or automatable) components of

latent fingerprint identification systems. 

•An effort to improve latent fingerprint identification

systems by reducing reliance on human examiners,

and increasing accuracy, speed, and interoperability. 

*NOTE: Humans ARE part of the end-to-end latent fingerprint identification 

process (including AFIS). However, ELFT is not intended to measure the 

accuracy of human based matching per se (examiners are only involved in

data preparation and results validation) 

March 2010 2 
Rolled (ink capture) Flat (ink capture) 

“Conventional” Fingerprints Latent Fingerprint 

(powder “lift”) 

Michael Indovina December 2009 IAD - Image Group 3 
Goals 

• Greater Automation 

o Reduced case backlog and expanded case file utilization 

o Reduced examiner workload (e.g. candidate list processing) 

o Improved workflow (focus on “difficult” latents) 

• Greater accuracy and interoperability 

o More identifications (faster) 

o Better watch-list performance (fewer false “hits”) 

o Improved Cross-domain searches 

• New Capabilities 

o AFIS usage by non-experts 

o Remote ID 

March 2010 4 
Sponsors 

December 2009 5 
 

History 

• Phase I Evaluation (2006-2007) 

o Small dataset; 11 participants; proof-of-concept 

• Phase II Evaluation (2008-2009) 

o AFEM (Automatic feature Extraction and Matching) algorithms 

o Workshop II (March ’09); Results presented; Phase III planning 

o Public Report (April ’09); *Concluded AFEM viable for “high quality” images 

• ELFT-EFS Evaluation #1 (2009-2010) 

o Images alone (AFEM) vs Images + manual feature markup 

o Evaluates AFEM vs. manual markup; standard vs (multi-level) EFS markup; 

flat vs rolled exemplars; single vs multi-exemplars 

o “Public Challenge” Summer 2009; Self-run test, anonymous 

o Evaluation #1 (Fall 2009–Spring 2010); NIST-run, public results 

o Preliminary report January 2010 

• fingerprint.nist.gov/standard/cdeffs 

March 2010 6 
 

 

Future Plans 

•Evaluation #2 (May–June 2010) 

o New SDKs (same data / same requirements) 

• detailed peformance results 

• miss analysis (In-person: March-April 2010) 

• re-test specified subtests 

o New participants (resources permitting) 

o More info: 

• fingerprint.nist.gov/latent 

• latent-efs@nist.gov 

March 2010 7 
Standard Features EFS (Extended Feature Set) 

December 2009 8
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of theundersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| By:              | /s/ GEOFFREY S. M. HEDRICK |   |
|------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|             | GEOFFREY S. M. HEDRICK     |   |
|             | CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND  |   |
|             | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER    |   |
|             |                       |   |
| February 5, 2007 |                       |
|             |                       |
|             | /s/ JAMES J. REILLY        |   |
|             | JAMES J. REILLY            |   |
|             | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER    |   |
|             |                       |   |
| February 5, 2007 |                       |

 

----
#### J. M. Hawkins *v.*T. L. Lee, etc.

Bailment — Carrying Without Compensation.

■Where a steamer undertook the transportation of a package without receiving or expecting compensation therefor its relation to the owner was that of a mere bailee and was mot liable for the loss of the package unless it resulted from its negligence or the negligence of its agents or servants.

Appeal — Judgment—Reversal.

The judgment of the court in a common law action stands on the same footing with the verdict of the jury, and will not be disturbed on appeal, unless palpably against the weight of the evidence.

APPEAL, FROM McORAOKEN CIRCUIT 'COURT.

January *24,*1873.

*Harris & 'Allen, for appellant.*

*Q. Q. Quigley, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The testimony shows that no change was made and no compensation expected for the transportation of the package containing plaintiff’s money from Paducah to its destination on the Tennessee River.

As to such package the owners of the steamer were not acting in the capacity of common carriers, but as mere accommodation bailees. They are not liable for its loss unless it resulted from the neglect of themselves, their agents or their servants.

Whether or not it was so lost, was a question which the parties voluntarily submitted to the court for adjudication. The judgment of the court in a common law action stands on the same footing with the verdict of a jury. We are not prepared to decide that the judgment in this case was palpably against the weight of the evidence.

It must therefore be *affirmed.*
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Registration Statement of Packaged Ice, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the "Company") on Form S-4 of our report on the Company dated
March 27, 1998 and our report on Reddy Ice Corporation ("Reddy") dated April
14, 1998, both appearing in the Prospectus, which is part of this Registration
Statement.

We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in the
Prospectus.




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Houston, Texas


June 29, 1998
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-136361) and
on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-37529, 33-44230, 33-55329, 33-63805, 333-04099, 333-07385, 333-65227, 333-71259, 333-71355, 333-74229, 333-75819, 333-90381, 333-44766,
333-52840, 333-66978, 333-68594, 333-100624, 333-106566, 333-112267, 333-128531, 333-129872, 333-147399 and 333-148672) of Medtronic, Inc. of our report dated
June 19, 2008 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
Exhibit 13 to this Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated June 19, 2008 relating to the financial statement
schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPricewaterhouseCoopers LLPMinneapolis, MinnesotaJune 24, 2008

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on
Financial Statement Schedule

To the Board of Directors of Medtronic, Inc.:

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements and of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting referred to in our report dated June 19, 2008 appearing in Exhibit 13 to this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Medtronic, Inc. (which report and consolidated financial statements are included in Exhibit 13 to this
Annual Report on Form 10-K) also included an audit of the financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a)(2) of this Form
10-K. In our opinion, this financial statement schedule presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth
therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPricewaterhouseCoopers LLPMinneapolis, MinnesotaJune 19, 2008

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              86
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,765
<ALLOWANCES>                                       669
<INVENTORY>                                      6,940
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,194
<PP&E>                                         679,014
<DEPRECIATION>                                 350,015
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 436,248
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,631
<BONDS>                                        147,448
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     166,002
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   436,248
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               261,061
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  204,689
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,716
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,801
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,855
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,534
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,321
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,362
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,683
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Fiscal Year 2022 Agency Report

1. Please provide a summary of your agency’s activities undertaken to carry out the provisions of 

OMB Circular A-119, “Federal Participation in the Development and Use of Voluntary Consensus 

Standards and in Conformity Assessment Activities” and the National Technology Transfer and 

Advance Act (NTTAA). The summary should contain a link to the agency’s standards-specific 

website(s) where information about your agency’s standards and conformity assessment related 

activities are available.

Standards are used to guide the work of the grantees and other HUD supported agencies in providing 

quality housing and improvements in America's communities. Standards support the achievement of the 

HUD mission by our state and local partners. In most cases, HUD and our partners use standards 

developed by or in conjunction with other related users, such as model building codes developed for 

and adopted by communities nationwide. Because there are virtually no differences between HUDassisted and market-based construction and development, use of standards such as building codes that 

are developed through a public process for the entire design and construction industry are relevant and 

appropriate. Because of the way HUD supports local housing efforts, the communities use the building 

codes that have been adopted at the state or local level for both the HUD-assisted projects as well as 

the broader construction market. In rare cases, HUD is responsible for the standards, as it is the case 

with the Government Standard: 24 CFR 3280 – Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards. 

As mandated in legislation, HUD publishes and enforces the construction standard for manufactured 

housing, which is being converted to a consensus standard.

2. Please list the government-unique standards (GUS) your agency began using in lieu of voluntary 

consensus standards during FY 2022. Please note that GUS which are still in effect from previous years 

should continue to be listed, thus the total number in your agency's report will include all GUS 

currently in use (previous years and new as of this FY):

Current total GUS: 1

(1) Government Unique Standard

24 CFR 3280 – Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards [Incorporated: 2000]

Voluntary Standard

ANSI A119.1 – Recreation Vehicles and NFPA 501C – Standard on Recreational Vehicles

Rationale

HUD-Unique Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards. HUD was required by legislation 

to “establish Federal construction and safety standards for manufactured homes and to authorize 

manufactured home safety research and development”. 

Updated FY2022: In 2022, HUD published a proposed rule updating the Manufactured Home 

Construction and Safety Standards on July 19, 2022. HUD continues working with the Home Innovation 

Research Labs to support the Manufactured Housing Consensus Committee in its work for providing 

recommendations to HUD for future updates to the standards.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 1 AND 2 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998    
<CASH>                                           3,912
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,510
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,084)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,247
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,709
<PP&E>                                           2,447
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,986)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,291
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,659
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           142
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,490
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,291
<SALES>                                          1,315
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,315
<CGS>                                              802
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      802
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (692)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (692)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (692)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)
        

</TABLE>
exv10w4



 





Exhibit 10.4




Restricted Stock Unit Award



Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Company’s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), you
have been granted a Restricted Stock Unit of ___shares of stock as outlined below:




	 	 	 
	Granted To:

	 	 
	 
	 	 
	Grant Date:
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	Granted:
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	Grant Price:
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	Vesting Schedule:
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	Performance Criteria:
	 	 





By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge receipt of this Grant on the date shown above, which
has been issued to me under the terms and conditions of the Plan. I further acknowledge receipt of
the copy of the Plan and agree to conform to all of the terms and conditions of the Grant and the
Plan.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Signature:

	 	 	 	Date
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





I, Patrick Freeman, Chief Executive Officer of Cordia Corporation (the Registrant) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period June 30, 2004 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report):

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By:/s/ Patrick Freeman



Patrick Freeman

Chief Executive Officer



August 12, 2004









*

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cordia Corporation and will be retained by Cordia Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request