alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS
                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

I, Daniel P. Beharry, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mera
     Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the Company, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
          procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
     most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee
     of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
     functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
          the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
          and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
          controls; and

6.   The Company's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
     quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal
     controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
     controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including
     any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
     weaknesses.

Date:   March 15, 2004

/s/DANIEL P. BEHARRY
-----------------------
Daniel P. Beharry
Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4321 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4321

 To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require 
 the Secretary of Health and Human Services to negotiate and disclose 
   lowest possible prices for prescription drug prices for Medicare 
                             beneficiaries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 10, 2004

  Mr. Lynch introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require 
 the Secretary of Health and Human Services to negotiate and disclose 
   lowest possible prices for prescription drug prices for Medicare 
                             beneficiaries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NEGOTIATION AND DISCLOSURE OF LOWEST POSSIBLE PRICES FOR 
              PRESCRIPTION DRUGS UNDER MEDICARE.

    Section 1860D-11 of the Social Security Act, as added by section 
101(a) of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and 
Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173), is amended by striking 
subsection (i) (relating to noninterference) and by inserting the 
following:
    ``(i) Negotiation and Disclosure of Best Prices.--
            ``(1) Negotiation.--In order to ensure that beneficiaries 
        enrolled under prescription drug plans and MA-PD plans pay the 
        lowest possible price, the Secretary shall have and exercise 
        authority similar to that of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 
        the Secretary of Defense, and the heads of other Federal 
        agencies and departments that purchase prescription drugs in 
        bulk to negotiate contracts with manufacturers of covered part 
        D drugs, consistent with the requirements and in furtherance of 
        the goals of providing quality care and containing costs under 
        this part. In exercising such authority, the Secretary shall 
        negotiate the best possible prices for such drugs.
            ``(2) Disclosure.--The Secretary shall widely disseminate 
        information on the prices for covered part D drugs negotiated 
        under paragraph (1).''.
                                 <all>
```
Article Ref: J-022 

Weights and Measures Connection, Vol. Click here to enter text. , Issue Click here to enter text. 

Page 1

Instructors José Torres and Phil Wright perform measurements during a 

dry run of the new Fundamentals of Metrology course being offered by 

the NIST Office of Weights and Measures.

June 24, 2013

NIST Office of Weights and Measures Receives Important 

“Continuing Education Accreditation

Byline: Mark Esser, NIST Tech Beat, June 20, 2013

The International Association for Continuing Education and Training (IACET) has awarded the National 

Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Office of Weights and Measures (OWM) an "Authorized 

Provider" accreditation. IACET Authorized Providers are the only organizations approved to offer IACET

Continuing Education Units (CEUs), which certify that IACET has evaluated the NIST OWM training 

program and found it to be compliant with internationally accepted standards.

Many states require that their weights and measures officials receive training throughout their careers. 

Using an accredited training organization gives those officials confidence that the training they will 

receive is of high quality.

"We’re proud of our education programs, which train hundreds of metrologists and state and local 

weights and measures officials each year in important legal metrology skills so that the U.S. weights and 

measures system stays on the cutting edge," says Carol Hockert, chief of the Office of Weights and 

Measures at NIST. "Our new partnership with IACET is a demonstration of our commitment to lifelong 

learning and high standards for all of our programs."

The accreditation period extends for five years and includes courses offered or created that follow OWM 

procedures during that time. With this accreditation, the NIST OWM joins nearly 650 organizations 

around the globe that have had 

their programs vetted by thirdparty experts in continuing 

education to ensure the highest 

possible standards are met.

The NIST OWM analyzes weights 

and measures training needs, 

obtains input from the weights 

and measures community, 

designs and delivers training for

laboratory metrologists and 

weights and measures officials, 

measures the impact and 

effectiveness of training to 

ensure ongoing continual 

improvement, and consults with 

the weights and measures 

community to ensure ongoing

professional development.
Article Ref: J-022 

Weights and Measures Connection, Vol. Click here to enter text. , Issue Click here to enter text. 

Page 2

In order to achieve Authorized Provider accreditation, NIST OWM completed a rigorous application 

process, including a review by an IACET site visitor, and successfully demonstrated adherence to the 

ANSI/IACET 1-2007 Standard addressing the design, development, administration and evaluation of its 

training program.

Photo Credit: E. Gentry
10878.

#### Hargett *et al. v.*The State.

Decided November 4, 1919.

Indictment for manufacture of intoxicating liquor; from Harris superior court—Judge Howard. July 36, 1919.

*George G. Palmer,*for plaintiffs in error.

*G. F. McLaughlin, solicitor-general,*contra.

Bloodworth, J.

1. The special ground of the motion for a new trial points out no error which would require the grant of a new trial.

2. This court is a court for the correction of errors of law alone. “It has no authority to entertain an assignment of error that the verdict is contrary to the evidence, if there is any evidence at all to support the verdict. This ground in the motion for new trial is addressed to the discretion of the trial judge, upon whom is imposed the duty of being satisfied with a verdict before he approves it.” *Bell*v. *Aiken,*1 *Ga. App.*36 (57 S. E. 1001). On questions of fact the jury is the final arbiter. The trial judge by overruling the motion for a new trial expressed his satisfaction with the verdict, and this court will not interfere.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.*
Form of Stock Certificate




 Exhibit 4.1 
  

First Responder Systems and Technology Inc. 
 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 AUTHORIZED: 30,000,000 COMMON SHARES, $.0001 PAR VALUE 
  

			
	         [Number]
	  	 [Shares]
  

	 	  	SEE REVERSE FOR
	This Certifies That	  	CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
	 	  	CUSIP
                        

  
 is the owner of 
  
 FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $.0001 PAR VALUE OF

  
 First Responder Systems and Technology Inc. 

 
 transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by
Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate and the shares represented hereby are subject to all of the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation, to all of which the holder by acceptance hereby assents.

  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and to be sealed with the Seal of the Corporation. 
  
 Dated: 
  

					
	[Louis K. Greenblatt]	  	 	  	[Joseph A. Roccaforte, Jr.]
	Secretary	  	 	  	President
	 	  	[CORPORATE SEAL]	  	 









 THE SHARES EVIDENCED HEREBY ARE SUBJECT TO A VOTING RIGHTS AGREEMENT AND AN INVESTOR RIGHTS AGREEMENT (COPIES OF WHICH
MAY BE OBTAINED UPON WRITTEN REQUEST FROM THE COMPANY), AND BY ACCEPTING ANY INTEREST IN SUCH SHARES THE PERSON ACCEPTING SUCH INTEREST SHALL BE DEEMED TO AGREE TO AND SHALL BECOME BOUND BY ALL THE PROVISIONS OF THE VOTING RIGHTS AGREEMENT AND THE
INVESTOR RIGHTS AGREEMENT, INCLUDING CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFER AND OWNERSHIP SET FORTH THEREIN.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4216 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4216

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a refundable 
              credit of $500 to public safety volunteers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 22, 2004

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a refundable 
              credit of $500 to public safety volunteers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Volunteer First Responders Tax 
Relief Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. REFUNDABLE CREDIT FOR PUBLIC SAFETY VOLUNTEERS.

    (a) In General.--Subpart C of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to refundable credits) 
is amended by inserting after section 35 the following new section:

``SEC. 35A. PUBLIC SAFETY VOLUNTEERS.

    ``(a) Allowance of Credit.--In the case of an eligible public 
safety volunteer, there shall be allowed as a credit against the tax 
imposed by this chapter for the taxable year an amount equal to $500.
    ``(b) Eligible Public Safety Volunteer.--For purposes of this 
section, the term `eligible public safety volunteer' means an 
individual who is a volunteer for more than half of the taxable year 
with a public safety organization, including any organization of 
firefighters, emergency medical personnel, or other first responders to 
emergencies.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Paragraph (2) of section 1324(b) of title 31, United 
        States Code, is amended by inserting ``or 35A'' after ``section 
        35''.
            (2) The table of sections for subpart C of part IV of 
        subchapter A of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by inserting 
        after the item relating to section 35 the following new item:

                              ``Sec. 35A. Public safety volunteers.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-2052

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Steven Zuber, also known as Steve Zuber lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Hot Springs

____________ Submitted: April 12, 2022 Filed: April 28, 2022 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, ARNOLD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Steven Zuber pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute methamphetamine, see21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846, and to possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drugtrafficking offense, see 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(i), and was sentenced as a career offender to 216 months' imprisonment. Even though the sentence that the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines recommended was between 262 and 327 months, Zubermaintains on appeal that this sentence is substantively unreasonable. More

specifically, he asserts that the district court 1 considered only sentencing criteria "that cast [him] in a negative [l]ight," and that the court's failure to give additional weight to other matters more favorable to him amounts to an abuse of discretion. We disagree. The transcript of the sentencing hearing shows that the district court carefully considered the very matters, such as Zuber's health afflictions and his struggles dealing with his son's suicide, that Zuber says it didn't adequately consider. In fact, the district court varied down significantly from the recommended sentencing range presumably because of the mitigating circumstances involved. Where a court sentences a defendant below the Guidelines range, "it is nearly inconceivable that the court abused its discretion in not varying downward still further." United States v. Anwar , 880 F.3d 958, 973 (8th Cir. 2018). The district court has "wide latitude" to weigh the relevant sentencing criteria, see United States v. Rogers , 20 F.4th 404, 406 (8th Cir. 2021) (per curiam), and we discern no abuse of that discretion here. Affirmed.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Susan O. Hickey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. -2-
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4330

To suspend temporarily the duty on 5,5-bis[(y,w-perfluoroC4–

20alkylthio)methyl]-2-hydroxy-2-oxo -1,3,2-dioxaphosphorinane, ammonium salt and 2,2-bis[(y,w-perfluoroC4–20alkylthio)methyl]-3-hydroxy 

proply phosphate, di-ammonium salt and Di-[2,2-bis[(y,w-perfluoroC4–

20alkylthio)methyl]]-3-hydroxy proply phosphate, ammonium salt and 

2,2-bis[(y,w-perfluoroC4–20alkylthio)methyl]-1,3-di-(dihydro 

genphosphate)-propane, tetra-ammonium salt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2004

Mr. FORBES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on 5,5-bis[(y,wperfluoroC4–20alkylthio)methyl]-2-hydroxy-2-oxo -1,3,2-

dioxaphosphorinane, ammonium salt and 2,2-bis[(y,wperfluoroC4–20alkylthio)methyl]-3-hydroxy proply phosphate, di-ammonium salt and Di-[2,2-bis[(y,wperfluoroC4–20alkylthio)methyl]]-3-hydroxy proply phosphate, ammonium salt and 2,2-bis[(y,w-perfluoroC4–

20alkylthio)methyl]-1,3-di-(dihydro genphosphate)-propane, tetra-ammonium salt.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4330 IH 

1 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 5,5-BIS[(Y,W2 PERFLUOROC4–20ALKYLTHIO)METHYL]-2-HY3 DROXY-2-OXO-1,3,2-DIOXAPHOSPHORINANE, 

4 AMMONIUM SALT AND 2,2-BIS[(Y,W5 PERFLUOROC4–20ALKYLTHIO)METHYL]-3-HY6 DROXY PROPLY PHOSPHATE, DI-AMMONIUM 

7 SALT AND DI-[2,2-BIS[(Y,W-PERFLUOROC4–

8 20ALKYLTHIO)METHYL]]-3-HYDROXY PROPLY 

9 PHOSPHATE, AMMONIUM SALT AND 2,2-

10 BIS[(Y,W-PERFLUOROC4–

11 20ALKYLTHIO)METHYL]-1,3-DI12 (DIHYDROGENPHOSPHATE)-PROPANE, 

13 TETRA-AMMONIUM SALT. 

14 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

15 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

16 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

17 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.38.43 5,5-bis[(y,w-perfluoroC4–

20alkylthio)methyl]-2-hydroxy-2-oxo-1,3,2-

dioxaphosphorinane, ammonium salt and 2,2-bis[(y,wperfluoroC4–

20alkylthio)methyl]-3-hydroxy proply phosphate, diammonium salt and Di-[2,2-

bis[(y,w-perfluoroC4–

20alkylthio)methyl]]-3-hydroxy proply phosphate, ammonium salt and 2,2-

bis[(y,w-perfluoroC4–

20alkylthio)methyl]-1,3-di-

(dihydrogenphosphate)-propane, tetra-ammonium salt 

(provided for in subheading 

3809.92.50) ......................... Free No Change No Change On or Before 

12/31/2007 ’’. 
3

•HR 4330 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
11104.

#### Burlington *v.*Fields.

Decided March 2, 1920.

Complaint; from Turner superior court—Judge Eve. September 1, 1919.

*Crum & Jones, W. T. Williams,*for plaintiff.

*Eldridge Cutts, J. W. Hay'good,*for defendant.

Luke, J.

This case was here on a former writ of error-, and was reported in 20 *Ga. App.*102 (92 S. E. 653). This court, by its decision then rendered, settled the controlling legal points in the ease. The subsequent trial was had in accordance with that decision, which now is necessarily the law of the case. The evidence submitted did not prove the case as laid in the petition, and it was not error to grant a nonsuit.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
Exhibit 32.2

 

Mechanical Technology Incorporated

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Mechanical Technology Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2002, the three month Transition Period ended December 31, 2001, and the twelve month periods ended September 30, 2001 and 2000 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Cynthia A. Scheuer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), that, to the best of my knowledge:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to

§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Annual Report of The Midland Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2006 (the Report), John W. Hayden, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and W. Todd Gray, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                      |  |  |  |                                                     
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                                      |  | 
|/s/ John W. Hayden                    |  |  |  | /s/ W. Todd Gray                                    
|John W. Hayden                        |  |  |  | W. Todd Gray                                        
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

March 7, 2007



| |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Midland Company and will be retained by The Midland Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.