alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4359

AN ACT

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to

increase the child tax credit.

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4359

AN ACT

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase

the child tax credit.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4359 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Credit Preserva3 tion and Expansion Act of 2004’’.

4 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN CHILD TAX CREDIT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 24 of the

6 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to child tax cred7 it) is amended to read as follows:

8 ‘‘(a) ALLOWANCE OF CREDIT.—There shall be al9 lowed as a credit against the tax imposed by this chapter

10 for the taxable year with respect to each qualifying child

11 of the taxpayer an amount equal to $1,000.’’.

12 (b) INCREASE IN PHASEOUT THRESHOLDS.—Para13 graph (2) of section 24(b) of such Code is amended to

14 read as follows:

15 ‘‘(2) THRESHOLD AMOUNT.—For purposes of

16 paragraph (1), the term ‘threshold amount’ means

17 $125,000 ($250,000 in the case of a joint return).’’.

18 (c) ACCELERATION OF INCREASE IN REFUNDABLE

19 PORTION OF CREDIT.—Clause (i) of section 24(d)(1)(B)

20 of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘(10 percent in the

21 case of taxable years beginning before January 1, 2005)’’.

22 (d) COMBAT PAY TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT.—Para23 graph (1) of section 24(d) of such Code is amended by

24 adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘For pur25 poses of subparagraph (B), any amount excluded from

26 gross income by reason of section 112 shall be treated as
3

•HR 4359 EH

1 earned income which is taken into account in computing

2 taxable income for the taxable year.’’.

3 (e) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

4 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

5 December 31, 2003.

6 SEC. 3. REPEAL OF SUNSET.

7 Title IX of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Rec8 onciliation Act of 2001 shall not apply to the provisions

9 of, and amendments made by, sections 201 and 203 of

10 such Act.

Passed the House of Representatives May 20, 2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
10348.

#### Southern Railway Company *v.*Collins.

Decided November 6, 1919.

Appeal; from Wayne superior court—Judge Higbsmitb. December 23, 1918.

*Bennet, Twitty & Reese, James W. Poppell,*for plaintiff in error.

Luke, J.

The evidence authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and for no error assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 70230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27806]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Transfer of First-Class Mail[supreg] Parcels to the Competitive 
Product List

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service hereby provides notice that it has filed a 
request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to transfer First-Class 
Mail Parcels from the Mail Classification Schedule's Market-Dominant 
Product List to its Competitive Product List.

DATES: Effective date: November 25, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John F. Rosato, 202-268-8597, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4f252027216129613d203c2e3b200f3a3c3f3c61282039"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f892979096d69ed68a978b998c97b88d8b888bd69f978e">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 14, 2014 the United States 
Postal Service[supreg] filed a request with the Postal Regulatory 
Commission to transfer First-Class Mail Parcels from the Mail 
Classification Schedule's market-dominant product list to its 
competitive product list, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642. The transfer 
would: (1) Remove First-Class Mail Parcels from the Market-Dominant 
Product List; and (2) replace it with a new ``retail'' subcategory 
within the competitive product list's First-Class Package Service 
product. The new retail subcategory would provide the same service 
standards and pricing structure as the current First-Class Mail Parcels 
product. Documents pertinent to this request are available at http://www.prc.gov, Docket No. MC2015-7.

Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Requirements.
[FR Doc. 2014-27806 Filed 11-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4

                         Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
Hastings Entertainment, Inc.:

We consent to the use of our reports included herein and to the reference to
our firm under the heading "Experts" in the prospectus.


KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

   
Dallas, Texas
June 11, 1998
10634.

#### Fletcher *v.*State of Georgia *et al.*

Condemnation; from city court of Albany—Judge Clayton Jones. May 12 1919.

*Pottle & Hofmayer,*for plaintiff in error.

*S. B. Lippitt, solicitor,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

1. Where a proceeding to condemn an automobile is instituted under the provisions of section 20 of the prohibition act approved March 28, 1917 (Ga. Laws, Extr. Session, March, 1917, p. 16), and the defendant fails to file any defense within thirty days from the filing of the petition, but where no judgment by default is entered by the court until after the defendant has filed his answer, it is error to dismiss the defendant’s answer, filed upon the calling of the case, upon the ground that it was filed too late. See, in this connection, Civil Code, § 5653; *Gordon*v. *Hudson,*120 *Ga.*698 (48 S. E. 131); *Pennsylvania Casualty Co.*v. *Thompson,*123 *Ga.*240 (2), 241 (51 S. E. 314); *Albany Pine Products Co.*v. *Hercules Manufacturing Co.,*123 *Ga.*270 (51 S. E. 297).

2. The error in striking the defendant’s answer rendered the further proceedings in the case nugatory.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit 31.1
  CERTIFICATIONS





I, Charles Gary Spaniak, Sr., certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;





2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4.  The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c)
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5.  The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls; and





6.  The Company's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.




Date: July 25, 2012/s/ Charles Gary Spaniak, Sr.Charles Gary Spaniak, Sr.Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of this Registration Statement on Form S-3 of Newmont Mining
Corporation of our report dated February 1, 1997, except for the fifth paragraph
of Note 1, which is as of March 10, 1997, pertaining to the consolidated
financial statements of Santa Fe Pacific Gold Corporation and Subsidiaries which
appears on page 21 of Newmont Mining Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1997. It should be noted, however, that such
financial statements are not included in such Annual Report on Form 10-K. We
also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such
Prospectus.

     
                                             /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
July 13, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> CT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,039,614
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,039,614
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               672,251
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (182,272)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (182,272)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (182.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (182.27)
        

</TABLE>
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                        Certification of Chief Executive Officer
              Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of MAXXAM Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does
hereby certify that:

     (a) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2006 of
the  Company,  as amended by Amendment  No. 1 thereto of even date  herewith (as
amended, the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: April 5, 2007

                                     /S/           CHARLES E. HURWITZ
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                                   Charles E. Hurwitz
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code).
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN FRANCISCO HERNANDEZCANCHOLA, a.k.a. Juan Bermedo-Arias,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-72104

Agency No. A095-417-014

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 24, 2013** 

Before: ALARCÓN, CLIFTON, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Juan Francisco Hernandez-Canchola, a native and citizen of Mexico,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his request for a

continuance. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

FILED

AUG 01 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-72104

discretion the denial of a continuance and review de novo due process claims. 

Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir. 2008) (per curiam). We

deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion or violate due process in denying

Hernandez-Canchola’s request for a continuance because he did not demonstrate

good cause. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29; Ahmed v. Holder, 569 F.3d 1009, 1012 (9th

Cir. 2009) (factors considered in determining whether the denial of a continuance

constitutes an abuse of discretion include the nature of the evidence excluded as a

result of the denial); Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring

error and prejudice to prevail on a due process claim). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, NIH Support for Conferences and Scientific Meetings (Parent R13/U13).                    

*Date:*                         December 15-19, 2014.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Room 3G62, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20852, (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Travis J. Taylor, Ph.D., Scientific Review Program DEA/NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20892, 240-669-5082,                         *Travis.Taylor@nih.gov*.                    
      ( print page 70881)    
This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

 Dated: November 21, 2014.

David Clary,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2014-28075 Filed 11-26-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connectionwith the Yearly Report of Mentor Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K forthe period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher J. Conway, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tothe best of my knowledge:

 

(1)        The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)        The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

/S/CHRISTOPHER J. CONWAY

Christopher J. Conway

Chief Executive Officer

June 25, 2003
Exhibit 99.2


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Maui Land & Pineapple
Company, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul J. Meyer,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.


/S/ PAUL J. MEYER
Paul J. Meyer
Executive Vice President/Finance
(Chief Financial Officer)
March 26, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          24,584
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,337
<ALLOWANCES>                                        70
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,398
<PP&E>                                         104,580
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,692
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,286
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,894
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           489
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,020
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,286
<SALES>                                         26,477
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,899
<CGS>                                           10,124
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,286
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,469
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,613
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,158
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,455
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,455
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.91


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 230 (Monday, December 1, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 71101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28142]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than December 12, 2014.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. The W. W. Pete Archbold Trust, and Michael G. Lewis as trustee 
of the W. W. Pete Archbold Trust, both of Ossian, Indiana; to acquire 
voting shares of Ossian Financial Services, Inc., and thereby 
indirectly acquire voting shares of Ossian State Bank, both in Ossian, 
Indiana.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 24, 
2014.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-28142 Filed 11-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P