alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd. at September  30, 2000,  and its  statement of
income  for the nine  months  then ended and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference to the Form 10-Q of CNL Income Fund VI, Ltd. for the nine months ended
September 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         3,214,598<F2>
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  210,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                   178,931
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         16,959,117
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,076,102
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 30,318,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     29,244,938
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   30,318,915
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,940,670
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  551,226
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,651,834
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,651,834
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,651,834
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Due  to the  nature  of its  industry,  CNL  Income  Fund  VI,  Ltd.  has an
unclassified  balance  sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
<F2>Includes 2,062,036 in restricted cash.</FN>




</TABLE>
NEXT STEPS

• Consolidate comments and feedback to inform development of the

SSDF companion resources

• Public draft document in March 2024

• Welcome comments and feedback by April 2024

• Final publication: July 2024

Feedback can be submitted to: ssdf@nist.gov
Thank You!
#### Joel J. Perrin, adm’r for H. J. Perrin v. Stephen V. R. Lepper, adm’r de bonis non for J. Sibley, Anna Louisa Fisk and Darius Perrin.

*Partnership*— Suit *for winding up 'business 'not barred by proceedings for discovery.*

Probate proceedings for discovery do not bar an otherwise proper suit in equity for winding up the concerns of a partnership ; delays caused by them can be allowed for in the progress of the chancery suit.

Appeal from Calhoun.

Submitted June 9.

Decided October 31.

Bill for accounting, etc. Complainant appeals.

Hughes, *O’Brien <& Smiley, Ashley Pond*and *Joseph A. Stull*for complainant.

T-Pro. *I). Adams, Wm. H. Porter*and *S. T. Douglass*for defendants.

A court of equity will not interfere to arrest proceedings pending in the probate court to settle an administration account, unless some peculiar necessity for the interference is shown, and then only to the extent of the necessity: *Holbrook v. Campau,*22 Mich. 288.

Campbell, J.

The bill below was filed for the purposes of winding up the concerns of a partnership. consisting of Horace J. Perrin and Joseph Sibley, and in which Darius Perrin is claimed to have asserted1 and possibly to have had an interest. 1 He is averred to have obtained possession1 of some assets of the firm. Lepper is brought in as Horace J. *348Perrin’s successor in the administration of Sibley’s estate, and Mrs. Fisk as devisee of the heir at law and general devisee of Sibley. The bill also sets up various transactions-in the management' of the estate, and improvement of property held in common by Horace Perrin and the Sibley estate, between Perrin and the heir Francis M. Sibley. Mrs.. Fisk demurred generally, and Lepper set up the pendency of certain discovery proceedings in the probate court. The bill was dismissed as to them, but Darius Perrin made no-objection to the bill and defends generally, and is not before us on the appeal.

The bill is in its present shape too defective to sustain, my substantial equity against the defendants who pleaded and demurred. Its allegations are too vague and indefinite.. But, while the court below rightly sustained these pleadings, it is not impossible that it may be so amended as to-present in a tangible form a proper case for equitable relief. The probate proceedings, in our opinion, do not prevent a suit in equity, if it is otherwise proper. Any delays caused by them can be allowed for in the progress of the chancery suit.

We are not, therefore, disposed to consider at length the questions involved in the bill, and the case will be remanded with leave to complainant to amend if. he shall so elect, without costs of this Court to either party.

The other Justices concurred.
Exhibit 10.13  Effective  December 18, 2008  Polypore
Administrative PolicySeverance  Purpose  In the event of the termination of employment of a Polypore salaried
employee for reason other than Cause, the employee may be eligible for
severance payment.  Eligibility  Salaried exempt employees with more than one year of service, who are
terminated for reason other than Cause. 
Examples include job elimination, workforce reduction, or inability to
satisfactorily perform the duties assigned. 
Eligibility will be determined by the Senior Vice President of Human
Resources in consultation with the Senior Leadership Team member responsible
for the employee.  The following guidelines will be used to determine the number of weeks
of severance provided to the terminated employee.  Age Plus Service< 30
  
  30-39
  
  40-49
  
  50+Professional Level
  
  4 wks
  
  6 wks
  
  8 wks
  
  12 wksManagerial Level
  
  8
  
  10
  
  12
  
  16Director Level
  
  12
  
  14
  
  16
  
  20VP Level
  
  14
  
  18
  
  22
  
  26SLT Level
  
  26
  
  39
  
  52
  
  52  The severance payment will be equal to the employees annual base pay
divided by 52 times the number of weeks indicated on the above matrix.  Such severance payments shall become payable
immediately following the employees involuntary separation from service (as
defined in Treasury Regulation 1.409A-1(n)(1)). 
The Company reserves the right to determine if the payments will be made
in a lump sum or salary continuation; provided that to the extent that the
employees severance amount is greater than two times the maximum amount that
may be taken into account under a qualified plan for the year of termination
pursuant to Section 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code), such excess shall in no event be paid after March 15
of the year following the year in which the employees


termination occurs; provided further that the portion of the employees
severance amount that is equal to or less than two times such maximum amount
shall in no event be paid after the end of the second year following the year
in which the employees termination occurs. 
To the extent a severance amount is paid in installments, each
installment shall be deemed a separate payment for the purposes of Section 409A
of the Code.  In addition to the severance payment, the employee will be eligible to
continue in the Polypore Medical Plan under COBRA at their current employee
contribution rate for the same number of weeks. 
After the expiration of the number of weeks of severance, the terminated
employee may continue medical coverage at the normal COBRA rates.  Non-exempt employees may be eligible for 4 weeks of severance under
this policy, subject to the same payment provisions set forth above for exempt
employees.  2
Botne detec=on, defense, and

removal in an always connected

world

Patrick Gardner

VP, Engineering

Security Technology and Response

Symantec Corpora=on

Botnet	
  detec=on, defense, and removal
Malware == Bots in Today’s World

• All malware today has a goal

– Financial gain, data	
  exfiltra=on, service disrup=on

• To achieve these ends, all malware has

– Auto-­‐update func=onality

– Command and control capabili=es

– Propaga=on mechanisms and distribu=on channels

Botnet	
  detec=on, defense, and removal
	
   	
   	
   	
  

	
   	
  

	
   	
   	
   	
  

	
   	
  

	
   	
   	
  

	
   	
   	
   	
   	
  

	
   	
  

	
   	
  

	
   	
  

 

 

 

 

 

An ounce of preven@on is worth a pound of cure

Network	
   File Reputa@on Behavioral	
   Repair

 Network-­‐based  File-­‐based  Reputa@on-­‐ Behavioral-­‐  Remediation 

Protec@on Protec@on based	
   based	
   Tools
 

Protec@on Protec@on

Stops malware as	
  it Looks for and removes Establishes	
  ac@onable Looks at files and Easy to use 

travels over the network	
   malware	
  in files security	
  informa@on	
   processes	
  as they	
   aggressive tools 

and tries to take up about en@@es	
  e.g.	
   execute	
  using	
   that can effectively 

residence	
  on a system	
   websites,	
  files,	
  and IP	
   malicious behaviors remove new threat 

variants on infected addresses	
   to detect	
  and

systems Detect malware	
  based on remove	
  malware	
  

network	
  ac@vity and
 

ar@facts	
  

Botnet	
  detec=on, defense, and removal
Exhibit 32

The
following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238. These
certifications shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In
connection with the Annual Report of Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,David C. ColeandFred W.
Rickert, respectively, the Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer and Vice President/Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/DAVID C. COLEDavid C. Cole
Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                                                                                          |  | 
|March 28, 2005Date                                                                                        |  | 
|                                                                                                          |  | 
|/s/FRED W. RICKERTFred W. Rickert
Vice President/Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)    |  | 
|                                                                                                          |  | 
|March 28, 2005Date                                                                                        |  | 
|                                                                                                          |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 24, 2017

d0517 

# Order

Clerk May 24, 2017

154710

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154710

COA: 326932

Wayne CC: 15

- 000361

- FC

SHERRON DESHAWN DAVIS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 15, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.3 05(H)(1), in

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the sentence of the Wayne Circuit Court,

and we REMAND this case to the trial court for resentencing. As the prosecutor

concedes, the trial court erred in scoring Offense Variable (OV) 13, MCL 777.4 3, at 25

points, because the sentencing offense was not part of a pattern of felonious criminal

activity involving three or more crimes against a person. The defendant did not commit

three crimes against a person within a five

- year period, and no points s hould have been

scored. Because correcting the OV score would change the applicable guidelines range,

resentencing is required. People v Francisco , 474 Mich 82 (2006). In all other respects,

leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that t he remaining question

presented should be reviewed by this Court.

W ILDER , J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
Opinion issued July 7 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 15 - 00286 - CV

——————————— PAULA M. MILLER , Appella nt

V. JAS FAMILY LIMITED P ARTNERSHIP#4, LTD. , Appell e e

On Appeal from the 149th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 65767

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Paula Miller , has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5, 20.1; see also T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN
. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013), § 101.0411 (West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil2

Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi

- District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13

- 91 27 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5, 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings , Bland, and Brown

.
**Exhibit 32.A**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form10-K of Mercantile Bankshares Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31,2004, (the “Report”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I,Edward J. Kelly, III, the Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to and forpurposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Edward J. Kelly, III |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Edward J. Kelly, III     |
| Chief Executive Officer  |
|                     |
| Date: March 14, 2005     |

 

1

----
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JOHN SCOTT EGAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D22-1415

November 29, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Gregory G. Groger, 

Judge.

Jason T. Forman of Law Offices of Jason T. Forman, P.A., Fort 

Lauderdale, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and William C. Shelhart, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to John Scott Egan's filing a motion for 

postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 

3.850.

SILBERMAN, LaROSE, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Exhibit 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph V. Joy, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Boundless Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June
30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Boundless Corporation.

                                            /s/ Joseph V. Joy, Jr.
                                            ----------------------
                                            Joseph V. Joy, Jr.
August 14, 2002                             Chief Executive Officer

I, Joseph Gardner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Boundless Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June
30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Boundless Corporation.

                                            /s/ Joseph Gardner
                                            ------------------
                                            Joseph Gardner
August 14, 2002                             Chief Financial Officer
10490.

#### Hawkins *v.*Smith, sheriff, *et al.*

Decided November 19, 1919.

Money rule; from city court of Floyd county—Judge Nunnally. February 24, 1919.

*John Camp Davis,*for plaintiff in error.

*L. H. Covington, Wright Willingham, Karris & Karris, W. B. Mebane, J. F. Kelly,*contra.

Stars:, J.

A landlord’s lien for supplies arises by virtue of the statute when the, supplies are furnished *(Cochran*v. *Waits,*127 *Ga.*93 (56 S. E. 241); Civil Code (1910), §§ 3340, 3341, 3348, par. 1), but such lien cannot be assorted against the tenant’s crop except-by foreclosure. *Lathem*v. *Stringer,*145 *Ga.*224 (88 S. E. 941); *Duncan*v. *Clark,*96 *Ga.*263 (22 S. E. 927). In the instant case the landlord had not foreclosed his lien when the tenant’s crops were sold, and therefore his lien was not in a position to be asserted, in the absence of sufficient equitable reasons.. Realizing that he could not stand on his lien foreclosure, he filed a paper in the nature of an intervention, attempting to set up an equitable claim to the fund in question on the ground that the tenant was insolvent. Even 4f the alleged insolvency of the tenant was sufficient equitable reason for him to participate in the fund raised by the sale of the tenant’s crops, the landlord failed altogether to carry the burden of establishing his alleged equity by evidence. *Moore*v. *Brown,*107 *Ga.*139 (32 S. E. 835). It was, therefore, not error for the trial judge to refuse to allow the landlord’s lien to participate in the fund raised by the sale of the tenant’s crops.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.*
Applications of Cells

• Production of commodity chemicals 

(Synthetic Biology)

• Production of therapeutic proteins

• Screening potential pharmaceuticals

• Regenerative medicine 

• Personalized diagnostics and treatment

• Research to feed innovation

CELL MEASUREMENT ASSURANCE:

Quantifying Biological Response

A view of the cell:
CELL MEASUREMENT ASSURANCE:

Cell Line Identification

Drug Development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research 

C. Glenn Begley and Lee M. Ellis propose how methods, publications and incentives 

must change if patients are to benefit. 

“Unquestionably, a significant contributor to failure in oncology trials is the 

quality of published preclinical data...The results of preclinical studies must 

... be very robust to withstand the rigours and challenges of clinical trials, Nature 483, 2012 stemming from the heterogeneity of both tumours and patients.”
• 11 million affected 

people, and expected to 

double by 2050; direct 

health care costs in the 

Americas ~US$98 billion

Age–Related Macular Degeneration

CELL MEASUREMENT ASSURANCE:

Quantifying Critical Quality Attributes

iPS derived Tissue derived

A benchmarking material makes sure phase rings are aligned every time.
Legislative and Initiative Drivers:

Precision medicine

21st Century Cures

Engineering biology 

Biomanufacturing

Industry Needs:

Biomanufacturing

Novel therapies and diagnostic

Basic Science:

Fundamental principles of biology

CELL MEASUREMENT ASSURANCE:

Drivers
<TABLE> <S> <C>

        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                             589,499
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                    1,454,947
<ALLOWANCES>                             0
<INVENTORY>                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 2,044,446
<PP&E>                               2,660
<DEPRECIATION>                        (976)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   2,046,130
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              163,842
<BONDS>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                      1,427,700
<COMMON>                         1,436,055
<OTHER-SE>                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     2,046,130
<SALES>                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     5,574
<CGS>                               39,931
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       39,931
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    25,956
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (60,313)
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                       (60,313)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (.02)


        

</TABLE>