alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

NationalInstitute of Standards and Technology 

Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-

January 23, 2018

SUBJECT: Contract Performance Following the End to the Lapse in 

Appropriations 

The lapse in federal appropriations has ended and the National Institute of Standards and 

Technology (NIST), a bureau of the U.S. Department of Commerce, is open and meeting its 

mission serving the nation. Access to facilities is available and personnel necessary to 

administer contract performance are now available. 

Access to facilities and government resources, including equipment and systems, were limited 

and personnel necessary to administer contract performance were not available. Generally, 

supply and service contracts that were funded beyond the date of the lapse in appropriation and 

did not require access to government facilities or resources, or active administration by 

Government personnel continued performance. 

Any deliveries that were not possible during the period of lapse in appropriations may now be 

made by coordinating with relevant Government personnel. Contracts with options to be 

exercised during the period of the lapse in appropriations and contracts needing funding will 

require communication with the relevant Contracting Officers. If you have a contract that you 

believe was affected by lack of access or lack of Government personnel, please contact your 

Contracting Officer. 

If you have questions on any aspect of the recent lapse in appropriations, or any other question 

regarding NIST acquisition activities, please contact your Contracting Officer.
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM **

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Number 33-25865 on Form S-8 dated December 22, 1988, the Registration Statement Number 33-48815 on Form S-8 dated June 24, 1992, the Registration Statement Number 333-73306 on Form S-8 dated November 14, 2001, the Registration Statement Number 333-100841 on Form S-8 dated October 30, 2002 and the Registration Statement Number 333-129160 on Form S-8 dated October 20, 2005, of our reports with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Mentor Corporation, Mentor Corporation management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Mentor Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2006.

 

/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Los Angeles, CaliforniaJune 12, 2006

 

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1





                              GART SPORTS COMPANY
                 Statement re Computation of Per Share Earnings


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                              28 Days Ended
                                                                               Fiscal Years                    January 31
                                                                -----------------------------------------     -------------
                                                                   1995            1996            1997            1998
                                                                ----------      ----------      ----------      ----------
<S>                                                             <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>        
Earnings (loss) per share:
Net income (loss) attributable to common stock                  $      508      $    4,457      $    6,684      $   (8,005)
Common and common equivalent shares outstanding:
Historical common shares outstanding at beginning of period      5,737,344       5,527,444       5,505,944       5,498,894
Effect of common stock and common stock equivalents issued              --              --              --              --
within one year prior to initial public offering
Weighted average common equivalent shares issued                        --              --          95,150              --
Weighted average treasury stock purchased                          (55,533)        (14,558)         (4,271)             --
Weighted average shares of common stock                                 --              --              --       1,713,373
Weighted average shares of common and common equivalent          5,681,811       5,512,886       5,596,823       7,212,267
shares outstanding
Basic earnings (loss) per share                                 $     0.09      $     0.81      $     1.21      $    (1.11)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share                               $     0.09      $     0.81      $     1.19      $    (1.11)
</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph V. Joy, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Boundless Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of Boundless Corporation.

                                       By: /s/ Joseph V. Joy, Jr.
                                           -----------------------------
                                           Joseph V. Joy, Jr.
                                           Chief Executive Officer

I, Joseph Gardner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Boundless Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of Boundless Corporation.

                                       By: /s/ Joseph Gardner
                                           -----------------------------
                                           Joseph Gardner
                                           Chief Financial Officer
10476.

#### ALLGOOD *v.*MONROE OIL AND FERTILIZER COMPANY.

An employee in .a mill who in attempting to put a belt on a rapidly revolving pulley chose a dangerous way of doing so was not entitled to recover for injuries thus received which he could have avoided by choosing a safe way known to him, although his choice of the dangerous way may not have amounted to actual rashness. Under the evidence the injuries were due to negligence of the plaintiff to which the defendant did not in any way contribute; and the court did not err in directing a verdict for the defendant.

Decided October 9, 1919.

Action for damages; from Walton superior court—Judge Cobb. February 20,1919.

*235
      *A. II. Davis, W. O. Dean,*for plaintiff.

*B. L. Cox, Walker & Roberts, R. P. Jones,*for defendant.

Luke, J.

The evidence in this case discloses that the plaintiff undertook to put a belt on a fast-revolving pulley, and in so doing was injured. The evidence also discloses that there was a safe way to put the belt on the pulley, and the safe way was known to the plaintiff. The evidence is without contradiction that the plaintiff had a choice of two ways of putting the belt on the pulley, one a dangerous way and the other a safe way. The plaintiff chose the dangerous way. The plaintiff having selected the dangerous way, he cannot recover of the employer for his injuries thus sustained, although his conduct in selecting that way may not have amounted to actual rashness. See *Belk*v. *Lee Roy Myers Co.,*17 *Ga. App.*684 (87 S. E. 1089), and cases cited.

The evidence fails to make out a prima facie case. The plaintiff had months of experience around the machinery where he was injured, and his injury was due to his own negligence, not contributed to in any way by the defendant. *Commercial Guano Co.*v. *Neather,*114 *Ga.*416 (40 S. E. 299); *Crown Cotton Mills*v. *McNally,*123 *Ga.*35 (51 S. E. 13); *Cawood*v. *Chattahoochee Lumber Co.,*126 *Ga.*159 (54 S. E. 944). Eor no reason assigned was it error for the court to direct a verdict for the defendant.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4331

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1(3H)-Isobenzofuranone, 3,3-bis(2-

methyl-1-octyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2004

Mr. FORBES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1(3H)-Isobenzofuranone, 

3,3-bis(2-methyl-1-octyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 1(3H)-

4 ISOBENZOFURANONE, 3,3-BIS(2-METHYL-1-

5 OCTYL-1H-INDOL-3-YL)-. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading:
2

•HR 4331 IH 

‘‘ 9902.33.67 1(3H)-Isobenzofuranone, 

3,3-bis(2-methyl-1-octyl-1Hindol-3-yl)- (CAS No. 

50292–95–0) (provided for 

in subheading 3204.19.40) .. Free No Change No Change On or Before 

12/31/2007 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
##### 



THE MIDLAND COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Exhibit (21)  Subsidiaries of the Registrant
December 31, 2002

The subsidiaries of the Registrant as of December 31, 2002, all of which
are included in the consolidated financial statements, are as follows:

|                                                       |  |               |  |             |     |            |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------- |  | ----------- | --- | ---------- |  | 
|                                                       |  |               |  |             |     | Percentage
|                                                       |  | State of      |  | of Voting  
|                                                       |  | Incorporation |  | Stock Owned
|                                                       |  |               |  |            
|M/G Transport Services, Inc.                           |  | Ohio          |  |             | 100 |           
|Midland  Guardian Co.                                 |  | Ohio          |  |             | 100 |           
|MGT Services, Inc.                                     |  | Ohio          |  |             | 100 |           
|SUBSIDIARIES OF MIDLAND  GUARDIAN CO.:                |  |               |  |             |     |            |  | 
|American Modern Insurance Group, Inc.                  |  | Ohio          |  |             | 100 |           
|SUBSIDIARIES OF AMERICAN MODERN INSURANCE GROUP, INC.: |  |               |  |             |     |            |  | 
|American Modern Home Insurance Company                 |  | Ohio          |  |             | 100 |           
|American Family Home Insurance Company                 |  | Florida       |  |             | 100 |           
|American Modern Life Insurance Company                 |  | Ohio          |  |             | 100 |           
|Lloyds Modern Corporation                              |  | Texas         |  |             | 100 |           
|American Modern Home Service Company                   |  | Ohio          |  |             | 100 |           
|SUBSIDIARIES OF AMERICAN MODERN HOME INSURANCE CO.:    |  |               |  |             |     |            |  | 
|American Modern Lloyds Insurance Company               |  | Texas         |  |             | 100 |           
|American Southern Home Insurance Company               |  | Florida       |  |             | 100 |           
|American Western Home Insurance Company                |  | Oklahoma      |  |             | 100 |           
|G.U.I.C. Insurance Company                             |  | Ohio          |  |             | 100 |           

The name of 12 wholly  owned subsidiaries of The Midland Company are not
shown above as such individual listing is not required.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 25 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk January 2 5 , 2019

15 8 141 ( 55 )

KAITLIN HAHN

, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 158141

v COA: 336583

Oakland CC: 2016

- 152229

- NF

GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY

, Defendant

- Appellant,

and

AUTOMOBILE CLUB INSURANCE

ASSOCIATION,

Defendant.

__________________________________________ _ /

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of defendant

- appellant to extend

the time for filing its reply is GRANTED. The reply will be accepted as timely filed if

submitted on or before January 29

, 201 9

.
EXHIBIT 32.2NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.CERTIFICATIONIn connection with the periodic report of Novellus Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended July 2, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),I, John Chenault, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as ofthe date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United StatesCode, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for theperiods indicated.     Dated: August 5, 2005 By:  /s/ John Chenault    John Chenault    Vice President and Chief
#### J. H. Gray *v.*Sandorf & Myer.

Insolvency — Acts Of.

The act of a debtor In procuring a creditor to bring attachment proceedings against him was held to be an act of insolvency.

APPEAL FROM HARRISON CIRCUIT COURT.

January 8, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

A remark made by Reickel in the presence of Wilhite, the special friend of Gray, had the effect of calling the attention of the latter to the failing condition of Reickel, and of bringing about a personal interview between the parties. The proof does not show the nature of that interview, but immediately afterward Gray sued out his order of attachment, and attempted by its levy to' secure a preference over the other creditors of the failing merchant.

On the same day Reickel telegraphed to a New York firm1 to secure their debt by attachment. The circumstances connected with the manner in which these two creditors were enabled to obtain prior liens, leaves no doubt but that Reickel gave them notice to *277attach with a design to prefer them to the exclusion of other creditors. That he then contemplated insolvency is too clear to admit of controversy.

*Cleary &*West, *for appellant.*

Trimble, *for appellee.*

The chancellor did not err in holding that the procuring of Gray’s attachment to be levied was an act of insolvency, and in taking steps to distribute the assets of the debtor under the provisions of the act of 1856, and the amendment of March 8, 1862.

Judgment *affirmed.*
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4306 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4306

To amend section 274A of the Immigration and Nationality Act to improve 
 the process for verifying an individual's eligibility for employment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 2004

Mr. Cannon (for himself and Mr. Andrews) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 274A of the Immigration and Nationality Act to improve 
 the process for verifying an individual's eligibility for employment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMPROVEMENTS TO EMPLOYMENT VERIFICATION SYSTEM.

    Section 274A(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1324a(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting before ``A person or 
        entity has complied'' the following:
                ``Such attestation may be manifested by either a hand-
                written or an electronic signature.'';
            (2) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the following:
        ``Such attestation may be manifested by either a hand-written 
        or an electronic signature.''; and
            (3) in paragraph (3), by inserting ``a paper or electronic 
        version of'' after ``must retain''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

 

Mechanical Technology Incorporated

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Mechanical Technology Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Cynthia A. Scheuer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), that, to my knowledge:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains  summary  finanacial  information  extracted  from Swift
Energy Pension Partners 1988-A,  Ltd's Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations
contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         1,402
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  8,838
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               10,240
<PP&E>                                         4,276,995
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,699,221)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 588,014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          62,207
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     525,807
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   588,014
<SALES>                                        108,371
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,412
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  68,115<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                12,942
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            12,942
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   12,942
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation deple-
tion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and interest
expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM THE COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
                                           
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      1,066
<SECURITIES>                                2,814
<RECEIVABLES>                               1,340
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                    41
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            5,430
<PP&E>                                     55,478
<DEPRECIATION>                             23,728
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             37,336
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       5,595
<BONDS>                                    16,693
<COMMON>                                       21
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       3,884
<PREFERRED>                                 5,730
<OTHER-SE>                                  5,413
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               37,336
<SALES>                                     4,098
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            4,647
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            5,105
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            702
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,160)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,160)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (160)
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,320)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.71)
        



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1




                                 June 18, 1998


Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C.  20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We were previously principal accountants for PC Service Source, Inc. and, under
the date of February 13, 1998, we reported on the consolidated financial
statements of PC Service Source, Inc. and subsidiaries as of and for the years
ended December 31, 1997 and 1996. On June 11, 1998, we resigned as principal
accountants for PC Service Source, Inc. We have read PC Service Source, Inc.'s
statements included under Item 4 of its Form 8-K dated June 15, 1998, and we
agree with such statements, except that we are not in a position to agree or
disagree with PC Service Source, Inc.'s statement that the change was approved
by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

                                        Very truly yours,


                                        /s/KPMG Peat Marwick LLP