alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3952

To amend the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 to increase the aggregate 

asset size limitation of the small bank regulatory relief provision, to 

provide for future adjustments of such amount for inflation, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2004

Mr. HENSARLING (for himself and Mr. BAKER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL

To amend the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 to 

increase the aggregate asset size limitation of the small 

bank regulatory relief provision, to provide for future 

adjustments of such amount for inflation, and for other 

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Promoting Community 

5 Investment Act of 2004’’. 
2

•HR 3952 IH 

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN AGGREGATE ASSET SIZE LIMITATION 

2 OF THE SMALL BANK REGULATORY RELIEF 

3 PROVISION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 809(a) of the Community 

5 Reinvestment Act of 1977 (12 U.S.C. 2908(a)) is amend6 ed by striking ‘‘$250,000,000’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘$1,000,000,000’’. 

8 (b) FUTURE ADJUSTMENT OF ASSET SIZE LIMITA9 TION FOR INFLATION.—Section 809 of the Community 

10 Reinvestment Act of 1977 (12 U.S.C. 2908) is amended 

11 by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

12 ‘‘(d) ADJUSTMENT FOR INFLATION.—

13 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—By January 31 of 2006, 

14 and the 1st day of each subsequent 1-year period, 

15 the Federal financial supervisory agencies shall 

16 jointly prescribe the amount by which the aggregate 

17 asset size limit described in subsection (a) shall be 

18 increased by calculating the product of—

19 ‘‘(A) $1,000,000,000; and 

20 ‘‘(B) the ratio of the value of the Personal 

21 Consumption Expenditures Chain-Type Index 

22 (or any successor index thereto) published by 

23 the Department of Commerce, as of December 

24 31 of the year preceding the year in which the 

25 adjustment is calculated under this paragraph, 
3

•HR 3952 IH 

1 to the value of such index as of the date this 

2 subsection takes effect. 

3 ‘‘(2) ROUNDING.—If the amount determined 

4 under paragraph (1) for any period is not a multiple 

5 of $50,000,000 the amount so determined shall be 

6 rounded to the nearest $50,000,000. 

7 ‘‘(3) PUBLICATION AND REPORT TO THE CON8 GRESS.—Not later than February 15 of any cal9 endar year in which an adjustment is required to be 

10 calculated under paragraph (1), the Federal finan11 cial supervisory agencies shall jointly—

12 ‘‘(A) publish in the Federal Register the 

13 amount calculated under such paragraph; and 

14 ‘‘(B) jointly submit a report to the Con15 gress containing the amount described in sub16 paragraph (A).’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1988-A, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations  con- tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         23,044
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  16,112
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               39,156
<PP&E>                                         4,167,317
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,787,045)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 419,428
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8,457
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     410,971
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   419,428
<SALES>                                        25,140
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               26,421
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  17,629<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,746)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (10,746)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,746)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

NationalInstitute of Standards and Technology 

Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-

January 23, 2018

SUBJECT: Grantee Performance Following the End to the Lapse in 

Appropriations 

The lapse in federal appropriations has ended and the National Institute of Standards and 

Technology (NIST), a bureau of the U.S. Department of Commerce, is open and meeting its 

mission serving the nation. Access to facilities is available, and personnel necessary to 

administer grant performance are now available. 

Generally, grants that were funded and did not require access to facilities, government resources, 

including equipment and systems, or active administration by Government personnel continued 

performance. Grantee access to the Automated Standard Application for Payment (ASAP) 

system was available throughout the lapse period. Grantees operating on a reimbursable basis 

should submit invoices to their Grants Officer. The GMIS System is now available. 

If you have questions on any aspect of the recent lapse in appropriations, or any other question 

regarding NIST grant activities, please contact your Grants Officer.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4037 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4037

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 475 Kell Farm Drive in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, as the ``Richard G. 
             Wilson Processing and Distribution Facility''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 2004

 Mrs. Emerson (for herself, Mr. Graves, Mr. Hulshof, Mr. Skelton, Ms. 
McCarthy of Missouri, Mr. Gephardt, Mr. Akin, Mr. Clay, and Mr. Blunt) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 475 Kell Farm Drive in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, as the ``Richard G. 
             Wilson Processing and Distribution Facility''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RICHARD G. WILSON PROCESSING AND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 475 Kell Farm Drive in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Richard G. Wilson Processing and 
Distribution Facility''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Richard G. 
Wilson Processing and Distribution Facility.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.13



 






EXHIBIT 10.13



Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) has entered into an agreement with each of the
following persons, which is substantially identical, except as set forth below, to the Form of
Employment Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.8.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10
(File No. 1-31650):




Name




Simon Biddiscombe

David W. Carroll

Mojy C. Chian

Jay Cormier

Raouf Y. Halim

Thomas J. Medrek

Wayne K. Nesbit

Daryush Shamlou

Thomas A. Stites

Bradley W. Yates



The multiple set forth in Section 6(i)(B) of the Employment Agreement for Mr. Halim is three and
the multiple set forth in Section 6(i)(B) of the Employment Agreement for the other persons is two.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SensiVida Medical
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended February 28, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Jose Mir, as President of the Company, and Frank D. Benick, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





Date: June 16, 2010
                      By:
                      /s/Jose
      MirJose
      MirChief
      Executive OfficerDate:
      June 16, 2010
                      By:
                      /s/
      Frank D. BenickFrank
      D. BenickChief
      Financial
Officer




This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed
original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000837290
<NAME> R.R. DONNELLEY EDGAR SERVICES
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,869
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,162
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,611
<PP&E>                                         252,293
<DEPRECIATION>                                  93,743
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 178,981
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,943
<BONDS>                                         57,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,962
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,075
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   178,981
<SALES>                                         19,234
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,333
<CGS>                                           11,031
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,031
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   911
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,132
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,649
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,460
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,189
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,189
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32(i)

Certification of Tim Hunt





CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Tim Hunt, Principal Executive Officer of Metaline Mining & Leasing Company (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Annual Report on Form 10KSB of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  April 14, 2005

/s/ Tim Hunt

___________________________

Tim Hunt,

Principal Executive Officer
- IIA-1
- IIA-2_Redacted
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4028 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4028

   To prohibit the award of a Federal contract unless the contractor 
   agrees to offer their employees certain health insurance benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 2004

   Mr. Wynn introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the award of a Federal contract unless the contractor 
   agrees to offer their employees certain health insurance benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON GIVING ADVANTAGE IN PUBLIC-PRIVATE 
              COMPETITION TO ENTITIES PROVIDING LESS HEALTH INSURANCE 
              BENEFITS THAN BENEFITS PROVIDED TO FEDERAL EMPLOYEES

    In the case of any public-private competition held under Office of 
Management and Budget Circular A-76 or any other outsourcing policy for 
the conversion of an activity or function performed by Federal 
employees, no advantage shall be given to an offeror for a proposal to 
save costs for the Federal Government by either--
            (1) failing to offer employer-sponsored health insurance 
        benefits to workers to be employed under the contract for the 
        performance of such activity or function; or
            (2) offering employer-sponsored health insurance benefits 
        to such workers that are less than the benefits provided for 
        Federal employees under chapter 89 of title 5, United States 
        Code.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


   
We consent to the inclusion in this Amendment No. 1 to the registration 
statement on Form S-1 of our report dated September 11, 1997, on our audit of
the balance sheet of Mewbourne Development Corporation, and our report dated
January 30, 1998, on our audit of the balance sheet of Mewbourne Energy Partners
98-A, L.P. We also consent to the reference to our firm under the caption
"Experts."
    




Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
Dallas, Texas
   
May 8, 1998
<PAGE>                                                         Exhibit 12
                    MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION
           COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                         (Dollars in Millions)


                                        Years Ended December 31
                              ---------------------------------------------
                               1995      1994     1993       1992      1991
                              ------    ------   ------     ------    -----

EARNINGS
  Earnings (loss) from
   continuing operations
   before income taxes
   and cumulative effect
   of accounting change       ($750)     $920     $459     $1,086     $615

    ADD: Interest expense       225       249      215        468      453
         Interest factor
           in rents              32        35       39         57       66
         Amortization of
           capitalized
           interest               1         1        1          2        2
                              ------   ------   ------     ------   ------
                              ($492)   $1,205     $714     $1,613   $1,136
                              ======   ======   ======     ======   ======




FIXED CHARGES
  Interest expense             $225      $249     $215      $468      $453
  Capitalized interest                               2
  Interest factor in rents       32        35       39        57        66
                              ------   ------    ------    ------   ------
                               $257      $284     $256      $525      $519
                              ======   ======    ======    ======   ======


Ratio of earnings to fixed
  charges                     (1.9X)(A)  4.2X     2.8X      3.1X      2.2X
                              ======   ======    ======    ======    ======


(A)  For the year ended December 31, 1995, earnings were inadequate to
     cover fixed charges.  The amount of such deficiency for the period
     was $749 million.
10383.

#### BYERS *v.*THE STATE.

The alleged newly discovered evidence in this case does not require a new trial.

Decided July 23, 1919.

Indictment for manufacture of intoxicating liquor; from Putnam superior court—Judge Park. .February 11, 1919.

*E. C. Jenkins, S. T. Wingfield,*for plaintiff in error.

*Doyle Campbell, solicitor-general,*contra.

Stephens, J.

The only ground of tbe motion for a new trial tliat is insisted upon in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error relates to alleged newly discovered evidence. The record shows that this alleged newly discovered evidence is that of witnesses who testified against the plaintiff in error in the investigation before a United States Commissioner in the presence of the plaintiff in error, and therefore can in no sense be “newly discovered evidence.” The mere fact that the defendant “did not know of its relevancy and importance” will not avail him. *Fleming*v. *State,*31 *Ga. App.*188 (93 S. E. 1012); *Adams*v. *State,*22 *Ga. App.*252 (3) (95 S. E. 877); *Rachels*v. *State,*22 *Ga. App.*649 (96 S. E. 1045). In his- affidavit attached to the motion for a new trial it is not stated that he “did not know of the existence of such evidence before the trial, and that the same could not have been discovered by the exercise of ordinary diligence.” Civil Code (1910), § 6086. Hence this ground of the motion should not be considered by this court. Moreover, this alleged newly discovered evidence is merely impeaching in its nature, and “it is a sound and well-settled rule that a new trial will not be granted on the ground of newly discovered testimony, if the only object of the evidence be to impeach the character or credit of a witness. Where one has been convicted of a crime, on false testimony, and witnesses have subsequently been discovered who can prove that testimony false, it is better that redress should be sought in executive clemency than that the court by granting a new trial should violate a general rule essential to the pure and certain administration of justice.” *Levining*v. *State,*13 *Ga.*513 (1-2).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Brpyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.5


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in this registration
statement on Form S-8 of our report dated February 3, 1997 on our audit of the
consolidated financial statements of Midcontinent Broadcasting Co. of Wisconsin,
Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and for the year then ended.

PRICE WATERHOUSE COOPERS LLP

/s/ Price Waterhouse Coopers LLP


Milwaukee, Wisconsin
July 6, 1998
10817.

#### Smith *v.*The State.

Decided November 4, 1919.

Indictment for burglary; from Bibb superior court—Judge Mathews. July 12, 1919.

*John R. Cooper, ~W. 0. Cooper Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*John P. Ross, solicitor-general, contra.*

Luke, J.

The evidence in this case almost demanded the conviction of the defendant, who was charged with burglary. The defendant had the benefit of a fair trial under a most favorable charge of the court. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
**Exhibit32.A**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MercantileBankshares Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2005,(the “Report”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, EdwardJ. Kelly, III, the Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to and for thepurposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 206 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934;

 

and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Edward J. Kelly, III |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Edward J. Kelly, III     |
| Chief Executive Officer  |
|                     |
| Date: March 10,  2006    |

 

----
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Patricia G. Kriss, Chief Financial Officer of Entropin, Inc. (the "Company"),
do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         (a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal
quarter ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 12, 2002

By:      /s/ Patricia G. Kriss
         -----------------------
         Patricia G. Kriss
         Chief Financial Officer