alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                   Exhibit 4.2

                   CONSENT OF CASSELS BROCK & BLACKWELL LLP

We consent to the reference to our firm and our opinion under the captions
"Legal Matters" and "Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations," in
the Offer and Circular included in this Registration Statement on Form F-80
of Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc.

                                       Very truly yours,

                                       /s/ CASSELS BROCK & BLACKWELL LLP
                                           CASSELS BROCK & BLACKWELL LLP

Toronto, Ontario
November 18, 2005
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Each of the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of Grande
Communications, Inc., hereby certifies that, on the date hereof:



|1. | The annual report on Form 10-K of Grande Communications Holdings, Inc. for the period ending December 31, 2005 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Grande Communications Holdings, Inc.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 31, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Roy H. Chestnutt   
|                     |  |  |  | Roy H. Chestnutt       
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 31, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Michael L. Wilfley 
|                     |  |  |  | Michael L. Wilfley     
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent
this Exhibit 32 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.
#### Mary F. Buford *v.*James Gutherie and Same *v.*Same.

Vendor and Purchaser — Vendor’s Lien — Foreclosure.

In tlie foreclosure of a vendor’s lien securing two. notes owned by the same person, one of which is not due, it is error to decree the sale as to. one subject to a lien of the other note.

APPEAL PROM HENRY CIRCUIT COURT.

April 21, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Hardin :

These cases, having been heard together, will be so decided.

Waiving other objections taken in the argument to both judgments, we deem' it sufficient to say that the first judgment of sale* being directly in conflict with the decision of this court in the case of *Emison v. Risque,*9 Bush 24, in that it directs a sale of the land for one instalment of purchase money subject to another, it must be reversed for reasons indicated in the opinion of the court in that case, and the error in that judgment necessarily invalidates the other.

*671
      *Rodman, Wheat, for appellant.*

*Thorn & Drane, for appellee.*

Wherefore both judgments are reversed and the causes remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Judge Pryor did not sit in this case.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 2014 / Presidential Documents 64295 

Notice of October 24, 2014 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to 

Sudan 

On November 3, 1997, by Executive Order (E.O.) 13067, the President declared a national emergency with respect to Sudan and, pursuant to the 

International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706), took 

related steps to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national 

security and foreign policy of the United States posed by the actions and 

policies of the Government of Sudan. On April 26, 2006, in E.O. 13400, 

the President determined that the conflict in Sudan’s Darfur region posed 

an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign 

policy of the United States, expanded the scope of the national emergency 

to deal with that threat, and ordered the blocking of property of certain 

persons connected to the conflict. On October 13, 2006, the President issued 

E.O. 13412 to take additional steps with respect to the national emergency 

and to implement the Darfur Peace and Accountability Act of 2006 (Public 

Law 109–344). 

The actions and policies of the Government of Sudan continue to pose 

an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign 

policy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared 

in E.O. 13067 of November 3, 1997, expanded on April 26, 2006, and 

with respect to which additional steps were taken on October 13, 2006, 

must continue in effect beyond November 3, 2014. Therefore, consistent 

with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), 

I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to Sudan 

declared in E.O. 13067. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

October 24, 2014. 

[FR Doc. 2014–25791 

Filed 10–27–14; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3295–F5 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PRESDOCSOB#1.EPS</GPH>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Exhibit 21


                       MEDUSA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                             Exhibit 21 to Form 10-K
                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant
                                December 31, 1997






    The following is a list of active subsidiaries of the Registrant and their
jurisdiction of incorporation. All of these subsidiaries are wholly-owned,
directly or indirectly, and are included in the consolidated financial
statements.


                  Cement Transit Company                       Delaware

                  James H. Drew Corporation                    Indiana

                  Medusa Aggregates Company                    Iowa

                  Medusa Minerals Company                      Maryland

                  Canadian Medusa Cement Limited               Ontario, Canada

                  Medusa-Citadel, Inc.                         Alabama

                  Medusa-Crescent, Inc.                        Pennsylvania

                  Medusa Aggregates LLC                        Pennsylvania

                  Medusa Portland Cement Company               Michigan

                  Medusa Minerals Co. - Lee                    Delaware

                  Medusa Minerals Co. - Sparta                 New Jersey

                  White Stone Company of Southwest
                     Virginia                                  Virginia

                  Clinch River Quarries, Inc.                  Virginia
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

POLYBLANK DESIGNS LIMITED, 

Plaintiff,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”,

Defendants.

Case No.: 1:20-cv-04453

Judge Sara L. Ellis

Magistrate Judge Susan E. Cox

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby files this Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal, without prejudice, as to the following Defendant(s) identified on Schedule A of the 

Complaint:

NO. DEFENDANT

15 Guangzhou Coton Sportswear Co., Ltd.

DATED: October 27, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt (Bar No. 6207971)

Keith Vogt, Ltd.

111 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1700

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Telephone: 312-675-6079

E-mail: keith@vogtip.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case: 1:20-cv-04453 Document #: 37 Filed: 10/27/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:4057
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document was electronically filed on October 27, 2020 with the Clerk of the Court using the 

CM/ECF system, which will automatically send an email notification of such filing to all registered 

attorneys of record.

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt

Case: 1:20-cv-04453 Document #: 37 Filed: 10/27/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:4058
10366.

#### Williams *et al. v.*Hart.

Luke, J.

1. The defendant having admitted in his plea the execution of the note sued on, it was not error to admit the note in evidence without requiring the plaintiff and holder of the note to prove its execution.

*372Decided November 6, 1919.

Complaint; from city court of Nashville—Judge Lovett. December 31, 1918.

*R. A. Hendricks,*for plaintiffs in error.

*J. A. Alexander,*contra.

2. There is no merit in the assignments of error upon the rejection of evidence, since 'the brief of the evidence shows that subsequently to the rulings complained of such testimony was admitted.

3. The plaintiff had legal title to the note sued upon; the evidence authorized the vei'dict, which has the approval of the trial judge; and no error of law is complained of which requires a now trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 32

  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER and PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Everest Fund, L.P. (the
"Partnership"), for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter
Lamoureux, President of Everest Asset Management, Inc., the General Partner of
the Partnership hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership.


                                        By: /s/ Peter Lamoureux
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name: Peter Lamoureux
                                        Title: Director, President and Treasurer

                                        August 10, 2005

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and is not being "filed" as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate
disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to liability under
that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32 is expressly and
specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                                                             E-3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      18,237,731
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            10,500,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                193,922,558
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    528,567,601
<ALLOWANCE>                                  7,744,782
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             760,977,102
<DEPOSITS>                                 646,147,229
<SHORT-TERM>                                48,555,119
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          8,613,416
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,002,505
<OTHER-SE>                                  56,658,833
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             760,977,102
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             32,383,404
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            8,765,925
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            41,149,329
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          21,639,212
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          23,533,169
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       17,616,160
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  830,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              21,803
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              9,164,254
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,706,495
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   8,706,495
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,876,495
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.89
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.467
<LOANS-NON>                                    153,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   491,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             6,947,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   36,000
<RECOVERIES>                                     4,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            7,745,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         7,187,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        558,000
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 24

Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 33-11 Filed: 12/10/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:420
Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 33-11 Filed: 12/10/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:421
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Effective date:*                         December 2, 2014.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 25, 2014, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Express Contract 20 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2015-12, CP2015-15.                

Stanley F. Mires,

Attorney, Federal Requirements.

[FR Doc. 2014-28297 Filed 12-1-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Thomas G. Tachovsky, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of
Entropin, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal
quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 12, 2003

By:      /s/ Thomas G. Tachovsky, Ph.D.
         ------------------------------
         Thomas G. Tachovsky, Ph.D.
         President and Chief Executive Officer

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Entropin, Inc. and will be
retained by Entropin, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4263 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4263

  To clarify the calculation of per-unit costs payable under expiring 
annual contributions contracts for tenant-based rental assistance that 
                    are renewed in fiscal year 2004.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 2004

 Mr. Frank of Massachusetts (for himself, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Capuano, Mr. 
 Cooper, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Davis of Alabama, Mr. Delahunt, Mr. Israel, 
  Mrs. Lowey, Mr. Lynch, Mr. McGovern, Mrs. Maloney, Mr. Markey, Mr. 
  Menendez, Mr. George Miller of California, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Neal of 
Massachusetts, Mr. Olver, Mr. Sabo, Ms. Loretta Sanchez of California, 
  Mr. Sanders, Mr. Sandlin, Mr. Sherman, Mr. Tierney, and Mr. Waxman) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To clarify the calculation of per-unit costs payable under expiring 
annual contributions contracts for tenant-based rental assistance that 
                    are renewed in fiscal year 2004.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF PER-UNIT COSTS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of the item relating to the Housing 
Certificate Fund in title II of the Departments of Veterans Affairs and 
Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations 
Act, 2004 (division G of Public Law 108-199; 118 Stat. 372) is 
amended--
            (1) by inserting ``in each calendar quarter'' after ``and 
        by applying''; and
            (2) by inserting ``in the most recent quarter for which the 
        public housing agency has submitted such actual per unit cost 
        information to the Secretary'' after ``actual per unit cost''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to all expiring section 8 tenant-based annual contributions 
contracts renewed pursuant to the paragraph referred to in subsection 
(a), whether such renewal occurs before, on, or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

BYTEMARK, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

MASABI LTD.,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________

2019-1628

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:16-cv-00543-JRG-RSP, 

Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

DARIUSH KEYHANI, Keyhani LLC, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by ANDY 

TINDEL, Mann, Tindel & Thompson, Tyler, TX. 

 DOUGLAS PERRY LALONE, Fishman Stewart PLLC, 

Bloomfield Hills, MI, argued for defendant-appellee. Also 

represented by THOMAS DONOHUE, MICHAEL FLUHLER.

 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

Case: 19-1628 Document: 38 Page: 1 Filed: 02/10/2020
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (DYK, TARANTO, and STOLL, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

February 10, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court 

Case: 19-1628 Document: 38 Page: 2 Filed: 02/10/2020