alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Daniel B. Curd *v.*King A. Stinnett.

Trial — Instruction.

An instruction which in effect tells the jury to give the evidence •such consideration and weight in making up their verdict as they may deem proper, is not prejudicial to defendant as it left the jury free to act and can hardly be regarded as- an instruction. *

Appeal — Reversal—Giving or Refusing Instructions.

The Court of Appeals can not reverse a judgment for an error of the trial court in giving or refusing instructions1, unless the ruling has been excepted to.'

APPEAL FROM JESSAMINE1 CIRCUIT COURT.

June 7, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

After the evidence was concluded, on both sides the jury retired to consider their verdict without having been instructed as. to the law of the case, neither party having asked any instructions.

After an absence of several hours they returned into court and asked the judge what was the legal effect of a promise m'ade by appellant to appellee that, he would pay for the cattle if he would let *728Lanham have them, and the judge told them, that if they believed from the -evidence that Curd told Stonnett before he sold the articles •charged to Lanham that he would pay for them, they might infer from, that fact that Lanham and Curd were partners, or they might not so infer at their discretion. On the contrary, if they believed from- the evidence that -Curd made any such promise to- Stinnett after the articles charged were sold to Lanham- by Stinnett it -did not bind Curd unless the promise was reduced to- writing. This instruction left the jury free to put such construction on the evidence as they deemed proper, if indeed it -would be regarded, as an instruction. It was in. effect saying to the jury, you have heard the evidence and you will give to it such weight in making up- your verdict as you deem proper. This we can not regard as prejudicial to appellant.

*Brown, for appellant.*

*Anderson, for appellee.*

But if it were otherwise there is no exception to the ruling of the court below in giving .the instruction to the jury. And this court can not reverse a judgment for an error of the court below in giving or refusing instructions unless the ruling of that court is excepted to, as has been repeatedly decided.

There is some conflict in- the- -evidence and the verdict certainly is not so flagrantly against the weight of the testimony as to authorize this court to interfere on that ground.

The judgment must be *affirmed.*
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 439

To create a system of background checks for certain workers who enter 

people’s homes, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2003

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To create a system of background checks for certain workers 

who enter people’s homes, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Domestic Consumer 

5 Safety Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BACKGROUND CHECKS FOR PEOPLE WHO WORK IN 

7 HOMES. 

8 The Federal Trade Commission shall make rules, on 

9 the record after opportunity for an agency hearing, to as10 sure that businesses in commerce that send employees into 
2

•HR 439 IH 

1 people’s homes perform adequate and appropriate back2 ground checks on those employees. 

3 SEC. 3. SANCTIONS. 

4 Whoever violates a rule made by the Federal Trade 

5 Commission under section 2 shall be liable for a civil pen6 alty of not more than $1,000,000. 

7 SEC. 4. DEFINITION. 

8 As used in this Act, the term ‘‘business in commerce’’ 

9 means a business that is in or affects interstate or foreign 

10 commerce.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4427 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 4427

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 7, 2004

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 73 South Euclid Avenue in Montauk, New York, as the ``Perry B. 
                       Duryea, Jr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 73 
South Euclid Avenue in Montauk, New York, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Perry B. Duryea, Jr. Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Perry B. Duryea, Jr. Post 
Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 6, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Pearson *v.*Fox.

Gilbert, J.

1. The court did not err in directing the verdict in favor of the plaintiff for a one-half undivided interest in the land. As against the plaintiff, the defendant’s title depended upon the validity of a sheriff’s deed to a predecessor in the chain of title. The sheriff’s deed was void, because the fi. fa., in virtue of which the sale was had, was dormant, and hence could furnish no authority for such sale.

*(a)*The fi. fa., issued on February 1, 1859, and levied on September 30, 1875, was dormant even when the dormancy statute is considered as tolled by reason of the acts known as the stay laws, from November 30, 1860, to July 21, 1868.

*(h)*The levy was excessive, and for that reason void. The fact that the sheriff held other fi. fas. in his hand, not levied, can not be considered on the question whether or not the levy was excessive. *Richards*v. *Edwardy,*138 *Ga.*694 (76 S. E. 64).

(c) The court did not err in refusing to admit in evidence other fi. fas., such as above mentioned. They were inadmissible because immaterial, and also because they were dormant at the time of the levy.

*(d)*The will did not appoint a trustee for the property, either as to the life-estate or the remainder. The testator died in 1854. In 1859 the court passed the following order: “Ordered that Stephen Pearson be and he is hereby appointed trustee for the property bequeathed to the sole and separate use of Georgia Ann Thomas during lifetime, and after her death to her children.” This order did not appoint a trustee for the remainder interest. *Ballenger*v. *Burton,*147 *Ga.*5 (92 S. E. 514). The life-estate which had been devised did not terminate until 1924; and it is well settled that prescription does not begin to run against the remainder interest until the expiration of the life-estate. *449Therefore the court did. not err in refusing to submit to the jury the question of prescription.

No. 6722.

December 11, 1928.

2. In view of the entire evidence, the judgment refusing a new trial will not be reversed because of the complaint that the defendant was not liable for rents and profits for the year 1924, the year in which the life-tenant died. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*451
      *G. L. Dickens*and *Allen & Pottle,*for plaintiff in error.

*T. M. Hunt*and *B. J. Fowler,*contra.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 233 (Thursday, December 4, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 72034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28561]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Board of Directors Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, December 11, 2014, 2 p.m. (OPEN Portion), 2:15 
p.m. (CLOSED Portion)

PLACE: Offices of the Corporation, Twelfth Floor Board Room, 1100 New 
York Avenue NW., Washington, DC

STATUS: Meeting OPEN to the Public from 2 p.m. to 2:15 p.m. Closed 
portion will commence at 2:15 p.m. (approx.)

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
1. President's Report
2. Minutes of the Open Session of the September 18, 2014 Board of 
Directors Meeting

FURTHER MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED (Closed to the Public 2:15 p.m.):
1. Finance Project--Kenya
2. Finance Project--India
3. Minutes of the Closed Session of the September 18, 2014 Board of 
Directors Meeting
4. Reports
5. Pending Projects

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Information on the meeting may be 
obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438.

    Dated: December 1, 2014.
Connie M. Downs,
Corporate Secretary, Overseas Private Investment Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2014-28561 Filed 12-2-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 3210-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000837913
<NAME> GENUS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                            7644
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    21851
<ALLOWANCES>                                       250
<INVENTORY>                                      25346
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 60186
<PP&E>                                           40835
<DEPRECIATION>                                   25715
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   89769
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            19806
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         97965
<OTHER-SE>                                       29596
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     89769
<SALES>                                          19681
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 19681
<CGS>                                            12313
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    19371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    15
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    295
<INCOME-TAX>                                       114
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                181
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       181
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
10508.

#### Webb, administratrix, *v.*Webb, administrator.

Jenkins, P. J.

1. While, under the provisions of section 5009 of the Civil Code (1910), an administrator, when sued as- such, or when defending solely the title of the estate, may enter an appeal from the court of ordinary to the superior court without paying costs and giving bond and security, or making oath as to his inability so to do, in no other case can he do so.

2. In a citation proceeding in the court of ordinary by a distributee against an administrator, a personal judgment is intended *(Thompson*v. *Stephens,*138 *Ga.*205, 207, 75 S. E. 136; *Everett*v. *Sparks,*107 *Ga.*48, 32 S. E. 878, 73 Am. St. R. 107); and such a judgment having been rendered against the administratrix in this case, and the administratrix having desired to take an appeal, she could not do so without paying costs and giving bond and security, or making oath as to her inability so to do; and the appeal having been taken without such requisites, it was properly dismissed. *Hickman*v. *Hickman,*74 *Ga.*401; *Bryson,*v. *Scott,*111 *Ga.*196 (36 S. E. 619).

*465Decided November 19, 1919.

.Appeal; from Elbert superior court—Judge Hodges. March 11, 1919.

*J. T. Bisk,*for plaintiff in error. *Z. B. Rogers,*contra.

*(a)*The mere fact that the administratrix in this case set up by way of defense that the plaintiff was not entitled to the share claimed by him, because of the fact that those from whom he claimed to have purchased it denied his title thereto, would not operate to convert the personal proceeding against the administratrix into a proceeding against the estate. By interposing such a defense the administratrix was not “defending solely the title of the estate; ” nor was the judgment rendered one against “the assets of the estate,” but it was a personal one against the administratrix.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.*
#### Orlando C. Smith et al. v. Charles F. Burton, guardian.

*Mandamus to compel payment.*

Mandamus does not die to compel a guardian to pay a claim against his ward which the probate court has adjudged valid; the proceeding must he by action.

Motion for order to sllow cause.

Submitted and denied June 13.

*■Julian G. Dickinson*for tbe motion.
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      OF PERIODIC REPORT**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Alpha Nutra,
      Inc.(the “Company”), certifies that:




1.  The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,
      2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







September
      21, 2006








By:
            /s/Mark
                L. Baum
              Mark
                L. Baum
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer





This
      certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
      to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
      purpose.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72191-72192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28528]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Member Conflict: Cognition, Diabetic Neuropathy and 
Metabolomics.
    Date: December 19, 2014.
    Time: 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Suzan Nadi, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 5217B, MSC 7846, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-
1259, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

[[Page 72192]]

    Dated: December 1, 2014.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-28528 Filed 12-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
Rev. 01272016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

219 SOUTH DEARBORN STREET

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

NOTIFICATION OF CHANGE OF ATTORNEY ADDRESS OR NAME

1. Complete this form and e-file it, using the Notice of Change of Address event, in each

case that you list below.

2. Update your contact information in CM/ECF. Click HERE for update instructions.

Name

Firm

Street Address

City/State/Zip Code

Phone Number 

Email address

ARDC (Illinois State Bar members, only)

If you have previously filed an appearance with this court using a different name, enter that name. 

List all active cases in which you currently have an appearance on file.

Case Number Case Title Assigned Judge

_______________________________

Signature of Attorney 

_______________________

Date 

Bradley Keith King Ahdoot & Wolfson, PC 2600 West Olive Avenue, Suite 500 Burbank, California 91505 310-474-9111 bking@ahdootwolfson.com 1:19-cv-07164 Acaley v. Vimeo, Inc. Matthew F. Kennelly 1:20-cv-04699 In Re: TikTok, Inc., Consumer John Z. Lee 1:20-cv-04723 In re: TikTok, Inc. Privacy John Z. Lee 1:16-cv-02714 Rivera et al v. Google LLC. Edmond E. Chang 1:20-cv-05090 Rossi v. Claire's Stores, Inc. Andrea R. Wood 1:20-cv-04729 S.A. v. TikTok, Inc. et al John Z. Lee /s/ Bradley Keith King November 25, 2020

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 108 Filed: 11/25/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1863
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4456 

To require labeling of raw agricultural forms of ginseng, including the country 

of harvest. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2004 

Mr. OBEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To require labeling of raw agricultural forms of ginseng, 

including the country of harvest. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ginseng Harvest La5 beling Act of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE OF COUNTRY OF HARVEST. 

7 The Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 

8 1621 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 
2 

•HR 4456 IH 

1 ‘‘Subtitle E—Ginseng 

2 ‘‘SEC. DISCLOSURE OF COUNTRY OF HARVEST. 

3 ‘‘(a) DEFINITION OF GINSENG.—In this section, the 

4 term ‘ginseng’ means an herb or herbal ingredient that— 

5 ‘‘(1) is derived from a plant classified within 

6 the genus Panax; and 

7 ‘‘(2) is offered for sale as a raw agricultural 

8 commodity in any form intended to be used in or as 

9 a food or dietary supplement under the name of 

10 ‘ginseng’. 

11 ‘‘(b) DISCLOSURE.— 

12 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—A person that offers gin13 seng for sale as a raw agricultural commodity shall 

14 disclose to potential purchasers the country of har15 vest of the ginseng. 

16 ‘‘(2) IMPORTATION.—A person that imports 

17 ginseng into the United States shall disclose the 

18 country of harvest of the ginseng at the point of 

19 entry of the United States, in accordance with sec20 tion 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

21 1304). 

22 ‘‘(c) MANNER OF DISCLOSURE.— 

23 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The disclosure required by 

24 subsection (b) shall be provided to potential pur25 chasers by means of a label, stamp, mark, placard, 
3 

•HR 4456 IH 

1 or other clear and visible sign on the ginseng or on 

2 the package, display, holding unit, or bin containing 

3 the ginseng. 

4 ‘‘(2) RETAILERS.—A retailer of ginseng shall— 

5 ‘‘(A) retain disclosure provided under sub6 section (b); and 

7 ‘‘(B) provide disclosure to a retail pur8 chaser of the raw agricultural commodity. 

9 ‘‘(3) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary of Agri10 culture shall by regulation prescribe with specificity 

11 the manner in which disclosure shall be made in 

12 transactions at wholesale or retail (including trans13 actions by mail, telephone, or Internet or in retail 

14 stores). 

15 ‘‘(d) FAILURE TO DISCLOSE.—The Secretary of Agri16 culture may impose on a person that fails to comply with 

17 subsection (b) a civil penalty of not more than— 

18 ‘‘(1) $1,000 for the first day on which the fail19 ure to disclose occurs; and 

20 ‘‘(2) $250 for each day on which the failure to 

21 disclose continues.’’. 
4 

•HR 4456 IH 

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

2 This Act and the amendments made by this Act take 

3 effect on the date that is 180 days after the date of enact4 ment of this Act. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000837893
<NAME> 88AP.TXT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         444,709
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  116,723
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               561,432
<PP&E>                                       4,845,222
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,972,358
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,434,296
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,434,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,434,296
<SALES>                                        241,031
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               245,452
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  135,977
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                109,475
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            109,475
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   109,475
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     9.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>