alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.2





                       CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM CONTROLLER

I, Anthony E. Applebaum, Interim Controller of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(the "Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant, to which this
certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m); and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


Dated:  March 24, 2003

                                              /S/ANTHONY E. APPLEBAUM
                                              -----------------------
                                              Anthony E. Applebaum
                                              Interim Controller


                                       29
<PAGE>
Case: 1:20-cv-04315 Document #: 28-1 Filed: 12/06/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:120
Exhibit - 21.1



MELLON FINANCIAL CORPORATION

PRIMARY SUBSIDIARIES OF THE CORPORATION (a)

DEC. 31, 2003



Mellon Trust of New England, National Association
 Incorporation: United States



The Boston Company, Inc.  State of
Incorporation: Massachusetts



Mellon Consultants, Inc.  State of
Incorporation: New York



Mellon Bank, N.A.  Incorporation: United States



| |  | Cornice Holding Company, Inc.  State of Incorporation: Colorado
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Founders Asset Management LLC  State of Organization: Colorado
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | The Dreyfus Corporation  State of Incorporation: New York
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------



Mellon 1stBusiness Bank, National
Association  Incorporation: United States



Mellon United National Bank
 Incorporation: United States



MBC Investments Corporation  State
of Incorporation: Delaware



| |  | Neptune LLC  State of Organization: Delaware
| | - | ---------------------------------------------



| |  | Mellon Europe Ltd.  Incorporation: England
| | - | -------------------------------------------



| |  | Mellon Global Investments Limited  Incorporation: England
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Newton Management Limited  Incorporation: England
| | - | --------------------------------------------------



| |  | Newton Investment Management Limited  Incorporation: England
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------



Mellon Human Resources & Investor Solutions Inc.  State of Incorporation: Pennsylvania



| |  | Mellon Investor Services LLC  State of Organization: New Jersey
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Mellon HR Solutions LLC  State of Organization: Pennsylvania
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------



Fixed Income (DE) Trust  State of Organization: Delaware



| |  | Fixed Income (MA) Trust  State of Organization: Massachusetts
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Standish Mellon Asset Management Company LLC  State of Organization: Delaware
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(a) | This listing includes all significant subsidiaries as defined in Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X, as well as other selected subsidiaries.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                      SUBSIDIARIES OF STATION CASINOS, INC.


NEVADA CORPORATIONS

Palace Station Hotel & Casino, Inc.
Texas Station, Inc.
Boulder Station, Inc.
Sunset Station, Inc.
Southwest Gaming Services, Inc.



MISSOURI CORPORATIONS

Kansas City Station Corporation
St. Charles Riverfront Station, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000837893
<NAME> 88APP
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         296,548
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   70,014
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               366,562
<PP&E>                                       4,852,644
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,352,145
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,867,061
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,170
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,844,891
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,867,061
<SALES>                                        319,518
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               327,829
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  258,658
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 69,171
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             69,171
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    69,171
<EPS-BASIC>                                       6.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 30, 2009 

Order 

 

January 30, 2009 

136310(70)(73)(74) 

ROBERT HUNTER and LORIE HUNTER, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

 SC: 136310 

v COA: 279862 

Oakland CC: 2006-721234-DC 

TAMMY JO HUNTER, 

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

JEFFREY HUNTER, 

 Defendant. 

____________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by plaintiffs-appellees for extension to 

January 20, 2009 of the time for filing their brief on appeal is considered and it is 

GRANTED. The motion by the California Women’s Law Center and others for leave to 

file a brief amicus curiae is considered and it is GRANTED. The motion for temporary 

admission of Amal Bass is considered and it is GRANTED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 27, 2010 

p0920 

Order 

 

September 27, 2010 

141102 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141102 

 COA: 296184 

Mecosta CC: 05-005658-FH 

CHARLES JOSEPH SPACHER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 4, 2010 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

DAVIS, J., not participating. I recuse myself and am not participating because I 

was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4237

To provide for congressional disapproval of certain regulations issued by 

the Comptroller of the Currency, in accordance with section 802 of 

title 5, United States Code. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2004

Mr. GUTIERREZ (for himself, Mr. PAUL, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. OTTER, Mr. 

TOWNS, Mr. BACA, Ms. LEE, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Ms. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. ACEVEDO-VILA ́, Ms. WATERS, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. NADLER, Mr. 

SANDERS, Mr. HINCHEY, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. OWENS, Mr. RUSH, Mr. 

WEINER, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. CLAY, Mr. SERRANO, Ms. 

SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Ms. BALDWIN, 

and Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL

To provide for congressional disapproval of certain regulations issued by the Comptroller of the Currency, in accordance with section 802 of title 5, United States Code.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the 

4 Comptroller of the Currency relating to bank activities and 
2

•HR 4237 IH 

1 regulations, published at 69 Fed. Reg. 1904 (2004), and 

2 such rule shall have no force or effect.

Æ
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-81,368-01

EX P ARTE HOL LY CHRISTINE VANSUMEREN, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1086412-A IN THE 182ND DISTRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Y E A R Y , J . , f

i l e d a d i s s e n t i n g o p i n i o n .

D I S S E N T I N G O P I N I O N I d i s s e n t f

o r t h e r e a s o n s s t a t e d i n m y d i s s e n t i n g o p i n i o n i n E x p a r t e F o u r n i e r , 4 7 3 S

. W
. 3 d 7 8 9 ( T e x . C r i m . A p p . 2 0 1 5 )

.

F I L E D : F E B R U A R Y 1 0 , 2 0 1 6 D O N O T P U B L I S H
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel, are you 

a 

 Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this Court’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 U.S.C.§1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on 

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 9 Filed: 09/04/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:71
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 425 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 425

To enable the residents of the Bayshore Manor assisted living facility 
  in Key West, Florida, to continue to receive supplemental security 
      income benefits under title XVI of the Social Security Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2003

 Ms. Ros-Lehtinen introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To enable the residents of the Bayshore Manor assisted living facility 
  in Key West, Florida, to continue to receive supplemental security 
      income benefits under title XVI of the Social Security Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FOR THE BAYSHORE MANOR ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY IN 
              KEY WEST, FLORIDA.

     For purposes of the supplemental security income program under 
title XVI of the Social Security Act, the Bayshore Manor assisted 
living facility in Key West, Florida, shall not be considered to be a 
public institution within the meaning of section 1611(e)(1) of such 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
566 A.2d 1282

#### CLELAND SIMPSON COMPANY, Petitioner, v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (DECKER and Moosic Borough), Respondents.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted on Briefs June 13, 1989.

Decided Dec. 5, 1989.

David E. Heisler, Lenahan & Dempsey, P.C., Scranton, for petitioner.

James J. Powell, Powell, Powell & Powell, Wilkes-Barre, for respondent, Robert Decker.

*78J. Scott Brady, O’Malley, Harris & Schneider, P.C., Wilkes-Barre, for respondents, Moosic Borough and Travelers Ins. Co.

Before CRUMLISH, Jr., President Judge, and CRAIG, DOYLE, BARRY, COLINS, PALLADINO and McGINLEY, JJ.

PALLADINO, Judge.

This is an appeal by Cleland Simpson Company (Employer) of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the decision of the Referee to grant benefits to the Executrix of the Estate of Robert Decker (Claimant). In an opinion and order dated August 4, 19891 this court affirmed the Board in part, and remanded to the Board for a specific finding on whether the Claimant was disabled as a result of the heart attack of August 20, 1977. The Board has now made the required finding.2

On remand the Referee found as a fact based upon a second deposition of Dr. Sandy A. Furey, Cardiologist, “that claimant was totally disabled from August 20, 1977 until May 14, 1981 ... as a result of his [Claimant’s] second heart attack which occurred on August 20, 1977.” Finding of Fact 1, Referee’s Decision of November 1, 1989. The Referee accepted as credible the testimony of Dr. Furey and found the Claimant “was totally disabled as a result of his second heart attack ...” and that this disability “was causally related to his work and therefore, compensable.” Finding of Fact 2. The sole issue remaining is whether there is sufficient evidence to support these findings. We conclude upon examination of the record as a whole that there is substantial evidence in the record to support these findings.

Accordingly, the order of the Board granting benefits to Claimant is affirmed.

*79ORDER

AND NOW, December 5, 1989, the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board in the above captioned matter is affirmed.

1

. *Cleland Simpson Company v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Decker and Moosic Borough),*128 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 62, 562 A.2d 981 (1989).

2

. The Board re-certified the record on November 6, 1989. The case was assigned to Judge Palladino on November 9, 1989.
**EXHIBIT
32**
 
 **Certification
Pursuant to**
 **18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to**
 **Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 
 In connection
with the Annual Report on Form 10-Q of AHPC Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for
the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Alan E. Zeffer, as Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Deborah J. Bills, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/
Alan E.
Zeffer
 Name:  Alan E.
Zeffer
 Title:  Chief
Executive Officer
 Date:  May 23,
2005
 
 /s/
Deborah J.
Bills
 Name:  Deborah
J. Bills
 Title:  Chief
Financial Officer
 Date:  May 23,
2005
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of ING Life
Insurance and Annuity Company (the "Company") hereby certifies that, to the
officer's knowledge, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                   By
-----------------                      -----------------------------------------
     (Date)                            David A. Wheat
                                       Director, Senior Vice President, and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                          30,914
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  116,020
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,908
<INVENTORY>                                    102,333
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               262,108
<PP&E>                                          63,977
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,218
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 334,974
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           88,735
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,644
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,306
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   334,974
<SALES>                                        363,986
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               363,986
<CGS>                                          290,521
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,208
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,256
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,421
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,580
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,192
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,388
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,388
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35
        

</TABLE>
#### Hugh Craycraft *v.*J. T. Ratcliff.

Libel and Slander — Matter in Mitigation.

Where an answer (fails to deny the uttering of the words alleged, hut avers that plaintiff had made statements prior to the taking of the depositions entirely different from the statements contained in the deposition, such statements should go to the jury on the ground of mitigation and not in justification.

APPEAL PROiM CARTER CIRCUIT COURT.

April 8, 1873.

*636/. *R. Botts, W. C.*Ireland, *for appellant.*

*Apperson & Reid, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Pryor :

It is difficult to determine the character of the defense filed in this action. If the pleader intended to justify he should have alleged the scienter in regard to the false statements made in appellee’s deposition as no crime could have existed, or perjury been committed unless these statements were made by the appellee, knowing that they were untrue. No denial is made of the publication of the words as alleged, or of the malice towards the plaintiff in uttering them. Nor is it alleged that the facts set up in the answer to the amended petition are pleaded in mitigation, and in fact the whole pleading seems to have been drawn with a view of seeing how near the pleader could make it a good answer in justification or mitigation and still leave it defective as a pleading on either ground. The Civil Code, by its provisions, however, permits not only the truth of the matter alleged to be pleaded, but any mitigating circumstances legally admissible in evidence to reduce the amount of damages. It is alleged in the petition that the defendant spoke the slanderous words with reference to the deposition of the plaintiff taken in a suit pending between one S. P. Ratcliff and Caswell Smith. The answer of the defendant to the original and amended petition fails to deny the uttering of the words alleged, but says, and as we are inclined to conclude by way of mitigation, that the plaintiff had made statements prior to this deposition entirely in conflict with the statements contained in it, and if so, we think this fact, if established, should have gone to the jury to be considered by them1 in mitigation and not in justification of the act complained of. The statements made under oath can not be shown to have been false upon testimony alone that the party had made different statements when not under oath, still such facts might be considered by the jury in mitigation of damages. For the reasons indicated the judgment is reversed and cause remanded with directions to award the appellant a new trial and for further proceedings consistent herewith.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our reports dated (i) February
10, 1997 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Commodore
Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries, (ii) February 3, 1997 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Southern Star Communications Inc., formerly
known as Osborn Communications Corporation, and (iii) March 5, 1998, except for
Notes 2 and 14 as to which the date is April 27, 1998, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of SFX Broadcasting, Inc. and Subsidiaries, in
the Registration Statement of Capstar Broadcasting Corporation on Form S-8
pertaining to 2,496,406 warrants dated April 1, 1998 and 200,000 warrants dated
July 5, 1998.


                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
July 22, 1998
KING A. GREENE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-5373

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 24, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Waddell A. Wallace, Judge.

King A. Greene, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY and MAKAR, JJ., and DAVIS, WILLIAM E., ASSOCIATE JUDGE, 

CONCUR.