alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1




SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Vuance Ltd. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: June 13, 2011

/s/ Arie TrabelsiBy: Arie TrabelsiTitle: Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
10624.

#### Atlantic Paper & Pulp Corporation *v.*Johnson.

Decided December 10, 1919.

Rehearing denied January 28, 1920.

Action for - damages; from Chatham superior court—Judge Meldrim. April 2, 1919.

*Travis & Travis, Hitch & Denmark,*for plaintiff in error.

*Oliver & Oliver,*contra.

Bloodwobth, J.

This is a companion case to that of *Atlantic Paper <& Pulp Corporation*v. *Bowen,*ante, and is controlled by the opinion renrendered in that case.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Lulce, J., concur.*
DATA IS POTENTIAL

Importance of Publicly Available Datasets for Developing 

Machine Learning Solutions

NIST Technical Language Processing Community of Interest

Dr. Nicholas Propes, Seagate, Senior Staff Data Scientist

April 14, 2021
Seagate | 2021 | 2

Seagate Overview

• Manufacturer of data storage solutions (hard drives, etc.)

• Machine Learning used for:

• Machinery health monitoring

• Product quality monitoring

• Marketing

• Hard Drive Design

• etc.

• Type of Data:

• Time Series / Events

• Images

• Point Cloud

• Logs

• Textual

• etc.

• Common Challenges

• Getting the data 

• Understanding the data

• Labeling the data 
Seagate | 2021 | 3

What are Public Data Sets and Examples?

• A public data set are datasets made available to the general public

• Where can you find public datasets:

• Dataset Search: datasetsearch.research.google.com

• Kaggle

• UCI Machine Learning Repository

• TensorFlow / Keras

• etc.

• Examples (from ubuntupit.com)

• MNIST

• ImageNet

• Twitter Sentiment Analysis

• Amazon Reviews Dataset

• Spam SMS Classifier Dataset

• YouTube Dataset

• Chars74K Dataset

• Facial Image Dataset

• ... etc.

• Datasets associated with a 

standard:

• Face Image ISO 

Compliance Verification
Seagate | 2021 | 4

What is an Ideal Data Set?

• Free

• Data explained well (system description, mode 

changes, sensors, etc.)

• Labelled accurately

• Training, Testing, and Validation data sets are 

static (for comparing results), covers behaviors of 

interest, and has sufficient variation (unbiased)

• Limited pre-preprocessing

• Reusable for different applications

• Not too large (or streaming)

• Associated with a standard
Seagate | 2021 | 5

How do we use Public Datasets?

• Learning / Test new ideas

• Compare approaches

• Debugging implementations

• Transfer Learning

• Test approach on multiple data sets 

(solutions not biased toward a single 

data set)

• etc.
Seagate | 2021 | 6

Creating a Public Dataset

• Define Problem (e.g. classification, regression, performance measures, narrow scope)

• Get the data and set up for ease of access

• If required, label the data (labor intensive)

• Document the data (e.g. descriptions of data columns, system, sensors, etc.)

• Test out your own solutions to find issues Quickly get
Seagate | 2021 | 7

Public Data Sets Yield Faster Results

• Example Use Case: Testing out new ML ideas

• Prerequisites:

• Understand the data and see if it is appropriate

• Get access to data

• Clean data

• If Public Data Set Available and understood well from multiple use:

• Understand the data and see if it is appropriate

• Get access to data

• Clean data (?)

Quickly get FD

Fast answers to questions such 

as:

• Does your approach make 

sense?

• Is your approach 

implemented correctly?

• etc.
Seagate | 2021 | 8

Main Takaways

• Can find public data sets through: Google Dataset Search and many others

• Ideal Data Sets: sufficient variation, coverage, reusable, static, standards

• Primary Uses: Learning and Testing and Comparing Approaches

• Benefits: After familiarizing with some public data sets, those can be reused quickly
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

          In connection with the Annual Report of Mills Music Trust. (the
"Trust") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Joel Faden, the chief
financial individual providing accounting services, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:

          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Trust. *

*    The statements of cash receipts and disbursements reflect only cash
     transactions and do not include transactions that would be recorded in
     financial statements presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The
     Trust is required to distribute all funds received after payment of
     expenses. Accordingly, the Trust has not prepared any statements of
     financial condition or cash flows.


Date: April 15, 2008                    S/ Joel Faden
                                        ----------------------------------------


                                      -22-
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                          CAPSTAR BROADCASTING CORPORATION
 
                     STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF HISTORICAL AND
                     PRO FORMA HISTORICAL OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                    (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
 
   
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           THREE MONTHS
                                                                              ENDED
                                                    YEAR ENDED              MARCH 31,
                                                   DECEMBER 31,    ----------------------------
                                                       1997            1997            1998
                                                   ------------    ------------    ------------
<S>                                                <C>             <C>             <C>
Computation for statement of earnings:
  Net loss attributable to common stock..........  $    (52,811)   $     (8,997)   $    (29,805)
                                                   ============    ============    ============
Computation for weighted average common shares
  outstanding(1):
  Weighted average common shares outstanding.....    25,455,211      19,288,014      46,130,912
  Incremental common shares applicable to common
     stock options and warrants based on the
     estimated fair value of the stock...........            --              --              --
  Weighted average common shares.................    25,455,211      19,288,014      46,130,912
                                                   ============    ============    ============
  Basic and diluted loss per common share........  $      (2.07)   $      (0.47)   $      (0.65)
                                                   ============    ============    ============
</TABLE>
    
 
---------------
 
   
(1) Earnings per common share is based on the weighted average number of shares
    of common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding during the period
    as adjusted for the one for ten reverse stock split.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Wayne Farms LLC

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−05191

Honorable Gary Feinerman

John Doe, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, December 30, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Hearing on motion for

default judgment [39] set for 1/6/2021 at 9:15 a.m. If Doe Defendant wishes to oppose the

motion, Doe Defendant should file a written opposition by 1/5/2021 or appear at the

1/6/2021 hearing; otherwise, the court will rule on the motion at the 1/6/2021 hearing.

Attorneys/Parties should appear for the hearing by calling the Toll−Free Number: (877)

336−1828, Access Code: 4082461. Members of the public and media will be able to call

in to listen to this hearing (use toll free number). Please, please be sure to keep your phone

on mute when you are not speaking. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are

reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting

of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including

removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of

entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Plaintiffs

shall electronically serve Doe Defendant with a copy of this order.Mailed notice.(jlj, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 41 Filed: 12/30/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:464
Organizational Profile 

Situation 

Process 

Process (Continued)

The voluntary Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure 

Cybersecurity was developed through a collaborative process by 

industry, academia, and government stakeholders. It enables 

organizations – regardless of size, sector, degree of cybersecurity risk, 

or cybersecurity sophistication – to apply the principles and best 

practices of risk management to improve security and resilience. NIST 

does not validate or endorse any individual organization or its 

approach to using the Cybersecurity Framework. 

Cybersecurity Framework Success Story
Results and Benefits 

Results and Benefits (Continued)

Contact Information & Resources

NIST Cybersecurity Framework Website: 

https://www.nist.gov/cyberframework

NIST Contact: cyberframework@nist.gov
#### Thomas P. Smith *v.*Brent Hopkins.

Court Commissioners — Special Commissioner — Compensation.

After a special commissioner has been appointed without objection by either of the parties or the regular commissioner,, after his labors ■have been performed, acted upon and accepted, it is too late to object to his remuneration.

APPEAL FROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY 'COURT.

February 11, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge PryoR:

There is no exception to be found to the appointment of Hopkins as special commissioner. The case had been previously referred to him, and his familiarity with its condition no doubt influenced the chancellor and the parties in committing it again to his hands for settlement.

Those interested in the adjustment of the matters in controversy have had the benefit of his labor and there is nothing in the record showing that the allowance is exorbitant.

Under the general law with reference to the services performed *449by commissioners proof is required as to the number of days the commissioner has been engaged in his work and the value of services rendered. This general law, however, does not apply to the commissioner of the Louisville Chancery Court, as was decided in the case of *Smith v. Cochran, 7*Bush 554.

*R. W. Wooley, for appellant.*

It is too late after the special commissioner has been appointed without objection by either of the parties or the regular commissioner, and after his labor has been performed, acted upon, and accepted, to say that he is entitled to no remuneration. The judgment of the court below making the allowance is *affirmed.*

-, *for appellee.*
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| By:               | /s/  RAYMOND J. WILSON   |   |
|-------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|              | RAYMOND J. WILSON        |   |
|              | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  |   |
|              |                     |   |
|              |                     |   |
| May 8,  2008 |                     |
|              |                     |   |
|              |                     |   |
|              | /s/  JOHN C. LONG        |   |
|              | JOHN  C. LONG            |   |
|              | CHIEF  FINANCIAL OFFICER |   |
|              |                     |   |
|              |                     |   |
| May 8,  2008 |                     |
|                   |                          |        |  |

 

23

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             840
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,737
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,056
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,834
<PP&E>                                          41,720
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,517
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 103,888
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,702
<BONDS>                                         28,560
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            99
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,573
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   103,888
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               102,694
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,001
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,561
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,204
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,357
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,357
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WRP Corporation (the
"Company") for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Lew Kwong
Ann, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Alan E. Zeffer, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

       /s/ Lew Kwong Ann
----------------------------------

Name:   Lew Kwong Ann
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  February 19, 2004

       /s/ Alan E. Zeffer
----------------------------------

Name:   Alan E. Zeffer
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  February 19, 2004

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

See also the certification pursuant to Sec. 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, which is also attached to this Report.

                                       30
10612.

#### Dubberly *v.*Eason, guardian.

Decided December 9, 1919.

Eviction; from city court of Blackshear—W. A. Milton, judge pro hac vice. March 30, 1919.

*W. W.*Bennett, for plaintiff in error.

*Memory <&*Memory, contra.

Bloodworth, J.

1. The city court of Blackshear has jurisdiction to hear determine an issue formed by a counter-affidavit to a warrant issued against one as a tenant holding over. Acts 1911, p. 211; *Dorough*v. *Morris,*21 *Ga. App.*477 (1), 478 (94 S. E. 641), and cases cited.

2. The verdict is supported by evidence, no error of law appears, the judgment is approved by the trial judge, and is

*Affirmed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J.,*concur.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



I, Ralph F. Hake, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Maytag Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date and presented in this report our conclusions about effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report base on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting: and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over the financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information: and



b) any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|Date: February 20, 2004             
|                                    
|/s/ Ralph F. Hake                   
|Ralph F. Hake                       
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer