alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2





I, Lawrence H. Wolfe, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;





2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4.  The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





d)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





e)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





f)
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5.  The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





c)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





d)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls; and





6.  The Company's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date:   July 25, 2012





/s/Lawrence H. Wolfe


----------------------------------------


Lawrence H. Wolfe


Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
Energy, Momentum, and Force in Classical Electrodynamics: Application to Negative-index 

Media

Masud Mansuripur1and Armis R. Zahkharian2

1College of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona

Tucson, AZ 85721

2Corning Incorporated,

Science and Technology Division,

Corning, NY 14831

Abstract:

The classical theory of electromagnetism is based on Maxwell's macroscopic equations, an energy 

postulate, a momentum postulate, and a generalized form of the Lorentz law of force. These seven 

postulates constitute the foundation of a complete and consistent theory, thus eliminating the need for 

physical models of polarization P and magnetization M -- these being the distinguishing features of 

Maxwell's macroscopic equations. In the proposed formulation, P(r, t) and M(r, t) are arbitrary functions 

of space and time, their physical properties being embedded in the seven postulates of the theory. The 

postulates are self-consistent, comply with special relativity, and satisfy the laws of conservation of 

energy, linear momentum, and angular momentum. The Abraham momentum density pEM(r, t) = E(r, t) × 

H(r, t)/c2emerges as the universal electromagnetic momentum that does not depend on whether the field 

is propagating or evanescent, and whether or not the host media are homogeneous, transparent, isotropic, 

linear, dispersive, magnetic, hysteretic, negative-index, etc. Any variation with time of the total 

electromagnetic momentum of a closed system results in a force exerted on the material media within the 

system in accordance with the generalized Lorentz law.
Measurement of Highly-Charged Ions Aids International Energy Program 

NIST researchers have used a unique device called an Electron Beam Ion Trap (EBIT) to produce and 

study highly-charged ions of heavy elements that are relevant to the development of controlled fusion 

energy. Atoms of the heavy elements hafnium (Hf), tantalum (Ta), tungsten (W), and gold (Au) were 

stripped of 60 or more electrons and held in the EBIT while their radiative properties and atomic structure 

were studied. Experimental observations in combination with sophisticated plasma kinetic modeling 

uncovered combinations of soft-x-ray emission lines that are suitable for use by fusion scientists in 

analyzing the super-hot plasmas in ITER*

 and other fusion energy devices. 

The NIST measurements have also produced results of significance to fundamental science and the theory 

of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED). The first simultaneous observation of the sodium D-line doublet in 

heavy sodium-like ions has enabled accurate measurement of the giant relativistic splitting for several large 

values of ionic charge. Unlike neutral sodium, where the splitting is one part in a thousand of the mean 

emission frequency, the relativistic and QED effects for heavy elements become so strong that the line 

separation is comparable with the mean frequency (Figure 4.1). NIST measurements of these lines can now 

serve as essential benchmarks for the most advanced relativistic and QED theories of atomic structure. 

Figure 4.1: Measured soft x-ray spectra from highly-charged ions of Hf, Ta, W, and Au. The D-line 

doublet for sodium-like W<sup>63+</sup> is shown by dashed lines. 

Contact: Dr. Yuri Ralchenko 

301-975-3210 

Yuri.Ralchenko@nist.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                       5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNITED 
CAPITAL CORP.'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES,
THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>             1,000
       
<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                      DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                  3,179
<SECURITIES>                                              313
<RECEIVABLES>                                          22,945
<ALLOWANCES>                                              501
<INVENTORY>                                             7,853
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       36,422
<PP&E>                                                 14,799
<DEPRECIATION>                                          7,104
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        121,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  42,242
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                  535
<OTHER-SE>                                             29,040
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          121,821
<SALES>                                                60,938
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       84,874
<CGS>                                                  47,099
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          78,922
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (4,801)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      1,126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        10,833
<INCOME-TAX>                                            4,996
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     5,837
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                            5,837
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            1.06
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE OCTOBER
31, 1997 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                         114,429
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  455,697<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    572,051
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,172,138
<PP&E>                                         147,693<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,419,328
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          271,872
<BONDS>                                        480,299
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           374
<OTHER-SE>                                     550,929
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,419,328
<SALES>                                        252,526
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               252,526
<CGS>                                          131,603
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  131,603
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,665
<INCOME-TAX>                                       619
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,046
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,046
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03<F2>
<FN>
<F1>This asset value represents a net amount.
<F2>The amount reported for EPS primary and fully diluted is in compliance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards NO. 128, "Earnings Per Share," and
represents the Basic and Diluted calculation as required by this standard.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed September 6, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-807

Lower Tribunal No. 13-29724

________________

Aquasol Condominium Association, Inc.,

Appellant,

vs.

HSBC Bank USA, N.A., etc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Beatrice 

Butchko, Judge.

David J. Winker, P.A., and David Winker, for appellant.

DeLuca Law Group, PLLC, and Joseph G. Paggi III and Kimberly 

George (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and HENDON and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-31316

VIRGIL L. ELLIS, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus JOHN P. WHITLEY; RICHARD IEYOUB, Attorney General, State of Louisiana, Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-1142-F

--------------------- June 25, 1998 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Virgil Ellis, Louisiana prisoner No. 107922, seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his federal habeas petition as procedurally barred under L A . C ODE C RIM . P ROC . A NN . art. 930.8. A federal court will consider habeas claims which are barred by a state proceduralNo. 97-31316 - 2 -

** Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 (1963). rule, if the petitioner demonstrates cause for the default and actual prejudice. Engle v. Isaac , 456 U.S. 107, 129 (1982). Ellis argues that his Brady ** claim is based on a police report which he did not obtain until May 4, 1992, more than three years after his conviction became final. Ellis asserts that his attorney requested disclosure of Brady material, but was told that no exculpatory evidence existed. Ellis argues that, contrary to the evidence presented at trial, the police report indicates that two of the three victims identified another man during a lineup in which Ellis participated and that no usable fingerprints were recovered from the victim’s car. The trial evidence showed that all three victims selected Ellis from the lineup and that his fingerprint was found on the door of the victim’s car. See State v. Ellis , 529 So. 2d 122, 123 (La. Ct. App. 1988). Ellis has made a credible showing that the district court erred by failing to address his allegations of cause and prejudice with regard to the Brady issue. Engle , 456 U.S. at 129; see Murphy v. Johnson , 110 F.3d 10, 11 (5th Cir. 1997). Ellis does not argue that the district court erred by rejecting his other federal habeas claims as procedurally barred; thus, he has abandoned those issues. Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 223-24 (5th Cir. 1993); F ED . R. A PP . P. 28(a)(6).No. 97-31316 - 3 - We GRANT Ellis’ motion for a COA and VACATE AND REMAND to the district court for consideration whether Ellis has established cause and prejudice with regard to his Brady claim.
COA GRANTED; VACATED AND REMANDED.
August 4, 2004 

MEMORANDUM for: Cigarette manufacturers and testing laboratories 

From: Richard G. Gann, Ph.D. 

Senior Research Scientist 

Fire Research Division 

Building and Fire Research Laboratory 

Subj: Request for comments on a standard reference cigarette 

As part of its Standard Reference Materials (SRM) Program, the National Institute of Standards 

and Technology (NIST) is planning to offer a standard reference cigarette to support industry and 

government efforts to improve public safety through requirements for less fire-prone cigarettes. 

The State of New York has promulgated a rule that all cigarettes sold in the State must meet a 

standard for low risk of igniting household furnishings. Other states and the U.S. Congress are 

considering comparable legislation. A similar bill has been enacted in Canada. A number of 

laboratories are performing the required standard test (ASTM E2187-02b) for product 

development, certification, and quality control. 

Experience says that the test method is robust and that professional fire test laboratories should 

be able to perform the test reproducibly. A reference cigarette would enable any laboratory to 

"calibrate" itself. 

NIST is planning to purchase from Philip Morris USA a supply of plain, non-commercial 

cigarettes with ignition strength near the NYS requirement. [It is not uncommon for a 

manufacturer to provide NIST with the material that becomes a SRM.] NIST will determine the 

cigarette performance and its variability in the same statistically valid manner that it certifies all 

its reference materials. The cigarettes will then be made available for purchase on the normal 

SRM cost recovery basis. 

NIST will notify the interested community at this web site when the standard cigarettes are 

available, most likely toward the end of this calendar year. 

Please send any comments on this planned SRM to me at: rggann@nist.gov.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, A. F. Petrocelli, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of United Capital Corp., (the “Company”), does hereby certify, with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) that:







1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:           April 29, 2011


By:
/s/ A.F. PetrocelliA.F. PetrocelliChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL 
POSITION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          39,713
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  452,665
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,661
<INVENTORY>                                     65,112
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               722,476
<PP&E>                                       4,287,259
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,520,994
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,404,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          770,645
<BONDS>                                      1,415,494
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          504,869
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           788
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,219,217
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,404,062
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               701,460
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  582,330
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (12,079)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,507
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                117,194
<INCOME-TAX>                                    36,684
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             80,510
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    80,510
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .97
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                          71,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,195,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    35,000
<INVENTORY>                                    185,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,559,000
<PP&E>                                       7,278,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,825,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,093,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,493,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       137,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,391,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,093,000
<SALES>                                      7,325,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,325,000
<CGS>                                        5,414,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,849,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (18,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             142,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (62,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (63,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (63,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
Internet of Things Advisory Board 

International Subgroup

Draft Recommendations

August 2023

Subgroup Members:

Dan Caprio

Ann Mehra

Mike Bergman

Tom Kat

Debbie Reynolds
Justification

Barriers

Agencies Federal considerations

Create data minimization international guidance related to IoT devices

Modifications Approved August 2023

Create internationally compatible 

data minimization guidance related 

to IoT devices, aligning with the 

NIST Privacy Framework principles 

((Control) Disassociated 

Processing (CT.DP-P)) and NIST 

Cybersecurity Framework 

principles 

● Data minimization (collection & 

retention) reduces potential harm 

from data breaches or unauthorized 

access

● Data minimization is inherently 

supportive of Privacy By Design

● Boosts consumer trust by 

ensuring data is only used for 

necessary purposes

● Helps to promote uniform data 

privacy standards across the globe

Implementation/ 

Funding

● Collaborate with public s ector, 

private s ector, and 

international counterparts

● Develop univers ally acceptable 

guidance on data minimization 

tailored to various IoT 

applications

● Differences in privacy laws and 

cultural attitudes towards privacy in 

different countries

● Res istance from companies that rely 

on extensive data collection

● The National Ins titute of Standards 

and Technology (NIST)

● The National Telecommunications 

and Information Administration

● The International Trade 

Administration

● Federal Trade Commis s ion (FTC)

● Cons ider the impact on bus inesses, 

es pecially s mall and medium-sized 

enterprises

● Recognize that data minimization 

s hould not hinder innovation or 

competitiveness in the IoT indus try

● Include principles of this guidance in 

future international agreements
US Cyber Trust Mark recommendation

Recommendation Approved August 2023

The IoTAB strongly supports the voluntary public/private partnership that created 

the US Cyber Trust Mark.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/07/18/bidenharris-administration-announces-cybersecurity-labeling-program-for-smartdevices-to-protect-american-consumers/

The U.S. Department of State must be committed to supporting the FCC and other 

members of the IoT Federal Working Group to identify and engage allies and 

partners toward harmonizing standards and pursuing mutual recognition of similar 

labeling efforts.