alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 417 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 417

To revoke a Public Land Order with respect to certain lands erroneously 
      included in the Cibola National Wildlife Refuge, California.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2003

  Mr. Hunter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To revoke a Public Land Order with respect to certain lands erroneously 
      included in the Cibola National Wildlife Refuge, California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVOCATION OF PUBLIC LAND ORDER WITH RESPECT TO LANDS 
              ERRONEOUSLY INCLUDED IN CIBOLA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, 
              CALIFORNIA.

    Public Land Order 3442, dated August 21, 1964, is revoked insofar 
as it applies to the following described lands: San Bernardino 
Meridian, T11S, R22E, sec. 6, all of lots 1, 16, and 17, and SE\1/4\ of 
SW\1/4\ in Imperial County, California, aggregating approximately 
140.32 acres.

SEC. 2. RESURVEY AND NOTICE OF MODIFIED BOUNDARIES.

    The Secretary of the Interior shall, by not later than 6 months 
after the date of the enactment of this Act--
            (1) resurvey the boundaries of the Cibola National Wildlife 
        Refuge, as modified by the revocation under section 1;
            (2) publish notice of, and post conspicuous signs marking, 
        the boundaries of the refuge determined in such resurvey; and
            (3) prepare and publish a map showing the boundaries of the 
        refuge.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FORM
10-QSB.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      12,729,283
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  193,768
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,932,722
<PP&E>                                          10,911
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,403)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,269,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          143,564
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        4,137,671
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,692
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,783,602
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,269,316
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               487,368
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,134,846
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,647,478)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,647,478)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,647,478)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.53)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
31.3**
 
 **CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
   I, Daniel
E. Matthews, certify that:
 
 1.  
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Stratford American
Corporation and its subsidiaries;
 
 2.  
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.  
The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:
 
 a)  
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 
 b)  
evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)  
disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  
The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 
 a)  
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b)  
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.
 
 Date: May
      16, 2005
    By:
    /s/ 
      Daniel E. MatthewsDaniel
      E. Matthews
      Controller,
      Secretaryand
      Treasurer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| August 11, 2008

  | By: /s/ | Richard T. Mason                  |
|-------------------------|---------|---------------------------------------------|
| (Date)

           |    | Richard T. Mason

President

 

  |

 

 

----
CERTIFICATION              		EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Dale W. Church, certify that:

- I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Mechanical Technology Incorporated; - Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible 
	for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
11047.

#### Hightower *v.*The State.

Decided January 27, 1920.

Conviction of manslaughter; from Fulton superior court—Judge Humphries. September 87, 1919.

*W. C. Munday, 8. C. Crane,*for plaintiff in error.

*John A. BoyTcin, solicitor-general, E. A. Stephens,*contra.

Luke, J

1. “Where there is nothing in the evidence to indicate that the killing was not voluntary, ahd where no charge is requested on that subject, involuntary manslaughter is not an issue in the case, and no allusion should be made to it in charging the jury, even though the prisoner’s statement by indirection suggests such a theory.” *Jackson*v. *State,*91 *Ga.*272, (3) (18 S. E. 298, 44 Am. St. Rep. 22). Even if such a theory could have been predicated upon the statement of the defendant, it was not error to fail to charge upon the law of involuntary manslaughter, no request having been made for a charge upon this subject.

2. The evidence authorized the conviction of the defendant; and the chajge of the court, when read as a whole, is not subject to the criticism urged against it. Eor no reason assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
#### The Slusser-McLean Scraper Co., Appellee, *v.*The United Electrical, Radio *&*Machine Workers of America et al., Appellants.

(No. 143

— Decided March 21, 1949.)

*Mr. H. K. Forsyth,*for appellee.

*Messrs. Davis, Davis & Handelman*and *Mr. Millard E. Hussey,*for appellants.

By the Court.

This is an appeal on questions of law from the judgment of the Common Pleas Court of Shelby county, finding 14 persons guilty of contempt for a violation of a restraining order issued by the court growing out of a strike of the employees of the *234Sl’usser-MeLean Scraper Company, the plaintiff, appellee herein.

We have carefully examined the record and considered the several grounds of errog assigned by the defendants, appellants herein. The determination of the issues raised depends largely on the factual development in the case. There is a clear conflict in the evidence on the determinative issues which the trial court resolved against the defendants. It was the province of the trial court to pass on the credibility of the witnesses. If the trial court believed the testimony of the witnesses for the plaintiff, which the trial court undoubtedly did accept as true, the finding of guilty was justified. There was ample evidence to support the judgment of the trial court by the degree of proof required.

There being no error in the record prejudicial to the defendants, the judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Miller, P. J., Hornbeck and Wiseman, JJ., concur.
10988.

#### Daniel *v.*The State.

Decided December 9, 1919.

Rehearing denied January 6, 1920.

Indictment for burglary; from Cobb superior court—Judge Morris. October 6, 1919.

Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court.

The indictment charged that the accused broke and entered a certain storehouse and took and carried away certain automobile tires and tubes, with intent to steal them. A number of specific objections to the description of the articles alleged to have been taken were made by demurrer to the indictment, and it tvas contended that because of insufficiency in the respects stated the indictment was fatally defective. The property was described as follows: “ten Lee Automobile tires, non-skid and plain tread, of various and sundry dimensions, to wit, 30x3% inches, 31x4 inches, 34x4 inches, said automobile tires being of the value of two hundred and fifty dollars, and six Lee Automobile inner tubes and rubber tires, the same being then and there the property of . . Ealph W. Northcutt, and being then and there in said storehouse contained and stored.”

*C. M. Dobbs, Abbott & Wallace, Glay & Giles,*for plaintiff in error.

*John T. Dorsey, solicitor-general, William Butt,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

1. The court properly overruled the demurrer to the indictment. See, in this connection, *Blackmon*v. *State,*24 *Ga. App.*384 (100 S. E. 730).

2. Conceding, but not deciding, that the court erred in refusing to charge section 1062 of the Penal Code of 1910, and in failing to instruct the jury that if they found the defendant guilty of burglary they had a right to recommend that he be punished as for a misdemeanor, this error was evidently harmless, since the jury in their verdict (under the indeterminate sentence act approved August 18, 1919, Ga. L. 1919, p. 387), fixed the minimum punishment of the defendant at ten years in the penitentiary when they could have fixed it at one year only. This verdict clearly shows that even if the requested charge had been given, the jury would not have recommended a misdemeanor punishment for the defendant.

3. The other special grounds of the motion for a new trial are not argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and are treated as abandoned.

4. The verdict amply authorized, if it did not demand, the defendant’s conviction of the offense charged, and the court did not err in denying a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
II 

Calendar No. 518 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4275 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 17, 2004 

Received and read the first time 

MAY 18, 2004 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently 

extend the 10-percent individual income tax rate bracket. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 4275 PCS 

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF 10-PERCENT INDIVIDUAL IN2 COME TAX RATE BRACKET. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (i) of section 1(i)(1)(B) of 

4 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to the initial 

5 bracket amount) is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(i) $14,000 in the case of subsection 

7 (a),’’. 

8 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT BEGINNING IN 2004.— 

9 Section 1(i)(1)(C) of such Code (relating to inflation ad10 justment) is amended to read as follows: 

11 ‘‘(C) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—In pre12 scribing the tables under subsection (f) which 

13 apply with respect to taxable years beginning in 

14 calendar years after 2003— 

15 ‘‘(i) the cost-of-living adjustment used 

16 in making adjustments to the initial brack17 et amount shall be determined under sub18 section (f)(3) by substituting ‘2002’ for 

19 ‘1992’ in subparagraph (B) thereof, and 

20 ‘‘(ii) such adjustment shall not apply 

21 to the amount referred to in subparagraph 

22 (B)(iii). 

23 If any amount after adjustment under the pre24 ceding sentence is not a multiple of $50, such 

25 amount shall be rounded to the next lowest 

26 multiple of $50.’’. 
3 

HR 4275 PCS 

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2003. 

4 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SUNSET. 

5 Title IX of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Rec6 onciliation Act of 2001 shall not apply to— 

7 (1) paragraph (1) of section 1(i) of the In8 ternal Revenue Code of 1986, and 

9 (2) the amendments made by paragraphs 

10 (1) and (7) of section 101(c) of such Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 13, 2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk. 
Calendar No. 518 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4275 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

come tax rate bracket. permanently extend the 10-percent individual inMAY 18, 2004 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
Capital Markets Group
                                      5560 South Broadway, Eureka, CA 95503
                                    P. O. Box 398, Fields Landing, CA 95537
Pacific Coast Farm Credit Services, ACA


February 16, 2000


Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.
120 Kane Street
Kahului, Hawaii  96732

Gentlemen:

Reference is made to that certain Term Loan Agreement dated as of
June 1, 1999 (the "Term Loan Agreement") by and among Maui Land
and Pineapple Company a corporation organized and existing under
the laws of the State of Hawaii ("Borrower") and Pacific Coast
Farm Credit Services, ACA ("Lender").  Capitalized terms used in
this letter without being defined shall have the meaning ascribed
to them in the Term Loan Agreement.

Borrower requested that Lender make certain modifications to the
Term Loan Agreement and Lender is willing to make such
modifications provided that the Borrower agree to the terms and
conditions set forth herein.  The modifications set forth below
shall be effective when the Lender shall have received a copy of
this letter signed by the Borrower in the space provided.

Modifications to Term Loan Agreement

1.   The following covenant shall be modified as follows:

     Capital Expenditures.  Section 12(e) of the Term Loan
     Agreement shall be deleted in full and the following shall
     be inserted in lieu thereof:

        Capital Expenditures:  Make Capital Expenditures, other
        than Capital Expenditures for or Investments in
        Borrower's "Kaahumanu Center Associates" Subsidiary, in
        excess of the following amounts:

               Year                     In Excess of
               2000                      $18,500,000
               2001                      $13,500,000
               2002                      $12,500,000
               2003                      $12,000,000
               2004 and thereafter *    $13,500,000


     * Subject to further review prior to establishing annual
     allowable capital expenditures for the period 2004 through
     loan maturity.

2.   The following covenant shall be added as Section 12(j) to
     Section 12 of the Term Loan Agreement.

     Indebtedness.  Incur any Indebtedness if after such
     Indebtedness is incurred the aggregate amount of all such
     Indebtedness of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries shall
     exceed Sixty-two Million dollars ($62,000,000.00)

Except as expressly modified hereinabove the terms and conditions
of the Term Loan Agreement shall remain in full force and effect
without waiver or modification.  The modifications contained
hereinabove and the Term Loan Agreement shall be read together as
one document.

Sincerely,

/s/ Sean P. O'Day
Regional Vice President

The undersigned agrees to the modification and the terms and
conditions set forth above.

BORROWER:

MAUI LAND & PINEAPPLE COMPANY, INC., a Hawaii Corporation

Date:          February 22, 2000

By:       /s/ Paul J. Meyer

Title:         Executive Vice President/Finance


Date:          February 22, 2000

By:       /s/ Gary L. Gifford

Title:         President
Exhibit 3(E)

                              CERTIFICATE OF CHANGE
                                       OF
                                MEM COMPANY, INC.
               Under Section 805A of the Business Corporation Law

                                 ---------------

         We, the undersigned,  the President and Secretary of MEM COMPANY, INC.,
hereby certify:

         1.  The name of the  Corporation is MEM COMPANY,  INC. under which name
             it was formed.
         2.  Its  Certificate  of  Incorporation  was filed by the Department of
             State  on   December   13,   1948.   A  Restated   Certificate   of
             Incorporation,  under Section 807 of the Business  Corporation Law,
             was  filed  by the  Department  of State on  April  21,  1966,  and
             amendments  thereto were filed by the Department of State of August
             3, 1973,  March 4, 1977,  August 3, 1979, May 1, 1987, June 3, 1988
             and June 23, 1988.
         3.  The  Certificate  of  Incorporation  is  amended to change the Post
             Office address to which the Secretary of State shall mail a copy of
             process against the Corporation served upon him.
         4.  Paragraph SIXTH of the Certificate of  Incorporation  is amended to
             read as follows:

                  "SIXTH"  The  Secretary  of State of the  State of New York is
designated as the agent of the  Corporation  upon whom process against it may be
served, and the Post Office address to which the Secretary of State shall mail a
copy of any process against the Corporation served upon him is:

                                    Proskauer Rose Goetz & Mendelsohn
                                    1585 Broadway
                                    New York, New York  10036
                                    Attn:   Allan R. Williams

         5.  The  aforesaid  change  to the  Certificate  of  Incorporation  was
             approved  by  authorization  of  the  Board  of  Directors  of  the
             Corporation.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  this Certificate has been subscribed this 28th day
of April,  1994, by the undersigned,  who affirm that the statements made herein
are true under penalties of perjury.


/S/    Margaret  A. Powers                    /S/    Gay A. Mayer
--------------------------                   -----------------------------------
Margaret A. Powers                           Gay A. Mayer
Secretary                                    President