alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### S. R. Neal *v.*Jas. B. Evans.

Rewards — Offer Made on Sunday — Renewal.

Where defendant after offering a reward on Sunday for the recovery of defendant’s- mule, met plaintiff on the next day -in another place, where plaintiff had gone in search of the mule, and defendant knew that plaintiff was searching for the mule but did not inform him that the offer of reward was withdrawn, it amounted to a renewal of the offer of reward.

APPEAL FROM. WEBSTER CIRCUIT COURT.

February 2, 1873.

*Gctzlay, Yeaman & Keenecke, for appellcmt.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

The only reason urged by counsel of appellant for a reversal of the judgment is the refusal of the court below to give to the jury the following instruction, to wit: If the jury believe from- the evidence that the only reward offered by the defendant in reference to his mule was offered on Sunday, or the Christian Sabbath, they must find for the defendant; unless they believe from the evidence that the defendant was a member of some society which observed as a Sabbath some day of the week other than Sunday or the Christian Sabbath.

The evidence without conflict establishes the fact that the offer of the reward for the reclamation of his mule was made on Sunday, the first day of the week, by appellant; and if he had made no other offer, nor done any act after that day to engage appellee in his service for the recovery of his mule, the contract arising out of the offer made -on that day might not have been enforceable. But on the day after the reward had been offered, appellant met with appellee at Madisonville, where he had gone in pursuit of the mule. He knew that appellee had gone there in search of the mule, and failed then either to dispense with his services or to inform him that the offer of the reward on the day before was withdrawn, which in effect was a renewal of the offer on Monday, or at least it might be so construed, and the instruction as asked without any qualification was properly overruled.

Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed.*

-, *for appellee.*
EXHIBIT 16

Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 33-3 Filed: 12/10/20 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:397
Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 33-3 Filed: 12/10/20 Page 2 of 8 PageID #:398
Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 33-3 Filed: 12/10/20 Page 3 of 8 PageID #:399
Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 33-3 Filed: 12/10/20 Page 4 of 8 PageID #:400
Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 33-3 Filed: 12/10/20 Page 5 of 8 PageID #:401
Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 33-3 Filed: 12/10/20 Page 6 of 8 PageID #:402
Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 33-3 Filed: 12/10/20 Page 7 of 8 PageID #:403
Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 33-3 Filed: 12/10/20 Page 8 of 8 PageID #:404
Order entered October 9, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01241-CV

TIMOTHY HOLZ, Appellant

V.

U.S.A. CORP., ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-05101

ORDER

The Court has before it appellant’s September 26, 2013 motion requesting leave to appeal 

in forma pauperis. The motion is DENIED without prejudice to the refiling of a motion 

containing an affidavit in compliance with TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(b).

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

____________________________________ 

MISH INT’L MONETARY INC., : 

on behalf of itself and : 

all others similarly situated, : 

 : Case No. 20-cv-04577 

v. : 

 : The Honorable Gary Feinerman 

VEGA CAPITAL LONDON, LTD. : 

and JOHN DOES 1-100 : 

____________________________________x 

PLAINTIFF’S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE 

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 7.1 

Mish International Monetary Inc., for its corporate disclosure statement pursuant to Rule 7.1 

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, states that it has no parent corporation and that no publiclyheld corporation owns 10% or more of its stock. 

Dated: August 5, 2020 

Respectfully submitted, 

s/Marvin A. Miller 

Marvin A. Miller 

Miller Law LLC 

115 S. LaSalle Street, Suite 2910 

Chicago, Illinois 60603 

312.332.3400 

mmiller@millerlawllc.com 

Christopher Lovell 

Lovell Stewart Halebian Jacobson LLP 

500 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2440 

New York, New York 10110 

212-608-1900 

clovell@lshllp.com 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on August 5, 2020, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was 

served on all counsel of record via the ECF document filing system for the United States District 

Court for the Northern District of Illinois. 

 By: /s/ Marvin A. Miller 

 Marvin A. Miller
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000836809
<NAME> DIMENSIONAL VISIONS GROUP, LTD.
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      0
<CASH>                                         117,542
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  281,798
<ALLOWANCES>                                   215,743
<INVENTORY>                                     14,325
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               211,528
<PP&E>                                       1,652,811
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,550,041
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,054,734
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          424,251
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,058,115
<COMMON>                                        62,418
<OTHER-SE>                                   (490,050)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,054,734
<SALES>                                        351,792
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               351,792
<CGS>                                          150,772
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  150,772
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,360,575
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,124
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,318,899)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,318,899)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.2


 


AMENDMENT
FIVE TO THE

1995 SHAREHOLDER VALUE PLAN OF

DUKE REALTY SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP


 


This Amendment
Five to the 1995 Shareholder Value Plan of Duke Realty Services Limited
Partnership, as heretofore amended (the “Plan”), is hereby adopted this 26th
day of October, 2005, by Duke Realty Services Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”). 
Each capitalized term not otherwise defined herein has the meaning set forth in
the Plan.


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS, the
Partnership adopted the Plan for the purposes set forth therein; and


 


WHEREAS,
pursuant to Section 5.1 of the Plan, the Board of Directors or the
Committee has the right to amend the Plan with respect to certain matters; and


 


WHEREAS, the
Board of Directors has determined that no further awards will be made under the
Plan from and after April 27, 2005; and


 


WHEREAS, the
Committee has approved and authorized this Amendment Five to the Plan;


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority reserved to the Committee under Section 5.1
of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of the date hereof, in
the following particulars:


 


1.  By deleting the last paragraph of Section 1.5
of the Plan and substituting therefor the following:


 


“Effective October 30, 2002, the maximum value of the awards payable
under the Plan that would have, absent amendment four to the Plan, been issued
under the Plan in Company common shares shall be an amount equal to the maximum
number of Company common shares that could have otherwise been issued under the
Plan (which was 200,000 shares after giving effect to the two-for-one stock
split on August 27, 1997) times the per share New York Stock Exchange
closing price of such shares on the date such shares would have otherwise been
issued.  The intent of this paragraph is to
limit the value of the awards payable under the Plan after Amendment Four to
the Plan to the value of the awards payable under the Plan before such
Amendment.”


 


All other
provisions of the Plan shall remain the same.


 





















 


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, Duke Realty Services Limited Partnership, by a duly authorized officer
of its General Partner, has executed this Amendment Five to the 1995
Shareholder Value Plan of Duke Realty Services Limited Partnership this 26th
day of October, 2005.


 


	
   

  	
  DUKE REALTY SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:  DUKE REALTY CORPORATION,
  General Partner

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /S/ Dennis D. Oklak

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Dennis D. Oklak

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             406
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,527
<ALLOWANCES>                                       830
<INVENTORY>                                      6,528
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,818
<PP&E>                                         223,797
<DEPRECIATION>                                 132,717
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,402
<BONDS>                                         50,120
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,814
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,863
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   140,047
<SALES>                                         54,512
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,512
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,089
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 934
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,553)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (562)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (991)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (991)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the inclusion in this registration statement on Form S-1
(File No. 333-48819, Amendment No. 4) of our reports dated March 26, 1998, on
our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedules of Capstar Broadcasting Corporation and Subsidiaries. We also consent
to the references to our firm under the captions "Experts" and "Selected
Financial Data".




                                        COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Austin, Texas
May 20, 1998
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 229 (Friday, November 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70868-70869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28058]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD


Notice of Publication of Federal Accounting Standards Advisory 
Board (FASAB) Annual Report and Three-Year Plan

AGENCY: Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Board Action: Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and the FASAB Rules of 
Procedure, as amended in October, 2010, notice is hereby given that the 
Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) has published The 
Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2014 and Three-Year Plan. The combined 
report allows stakeholders to consider FASAB's progress and invites 
them to advise the Board about its plans. Your views regarding the 
content of the

[[Page 70869]]

annual report and the Board's project priorities for the next three 
years are requested by January 31, 2015.
    The Report and Three-Year Plan are available at http://www.fasab.gov/about/our-annual-reports/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wendy M. Payne, Executive Director, 
441 G St. NW., Mail Stop 6H19, Washington, DC 20548 or call 202-512-
7350.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463.

    Dated: November 21, 2014.
Charles Jackson,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-28058 Filed 11-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-02-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

OMALI A. MCKAY, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 446 WAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED. 

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
10689.

#### ELDERS *v.*THE STATE.

It was proper in this case to charge the jury on voluntary manslaughter.

Decided October 14, 1919.

Indictment for murder—conviction of manslaughter; from Colquitt superior court—Judge Thomas. May 22, 1919.

*W. F. Way,*for plaintiff in error.

*C. F. Hay, solicitor-general,*contra.

Bloodworth, J.

The plaintiff in error was tried for murder and convicted of voluntary manslaughter. The only ground of the motion for a new trial which is argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error is that one which alleges that the court erred in charging the jury on voluntary manslaughter. In *Cain*v. *State,*7 *Ga. App.*24, this court said: “It is well settled by repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and this court that on a trial for murder, if there is anything deducible from the evidence or the defendant’s statement that would tend to show manslaughter, voluntary or involuntary, it is the duty of the court to instruct the jury fully on the law of manslaughter. *Crawford*v. *State,*12 *Ga.*142 (6); *Jackson*v. *State,*76 *Ga.*473; *Wynne*v. *State,*56 *Ga.*113; *Bell*v. *State,*130 *Ga.*865 (61 S. E. 996); *Strickland*v. *State,*133 *Ga.*76 (65 S. E. 148); *Pyle*v. *State, 4 Ga. App.*811 (62 S. E. 540). In the *Crawford*case, supra, the court strongly expresses itself on the subject as follows: ‘When a defendant is put upon trial for murder, and there is any doubt as to the grade of homicide of which he is guilty, it is the duty of the court clearlv and *280distinctly to instruct the jury as to the law, defining the several grades of homicide as recognized by the Penal Code, and then leave it to the jury to find from the evidence of what particular grade he is guilty/ In *Jackson*v. *State,*supra, the court uses still stronger language, and holds that ‘where there is evidence sufficient to raise a doubt, however slight, upon the point whether the case is murder or manslaughter, voluntary or involuntary, the court should instruct the jury upon these grades of manslaughter as well as murder/ ” Under these rulings as applied to the facts of this case, the trial judge did not err in charging on voluntary manslaughter.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                               5
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            FEB-28-1999

<CASH>                                  1
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1
<PP&E>                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          1
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   71,203
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                50,694
<OTHER-SE>                              (71,202)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            1
<SALES>                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        0
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        89,463
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            (89,463)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.02)

        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.31
                                                                   -------------

                                 CORPORATE NOTE

AUGUST 18, 2000                                                         $100,000


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned Maker promises to pay to the order of
(Issuer):

                                    Hi-Tel Group, Inc.
                                    2400 E. Commercial Blvd, #205
                                    Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33308

The sum of $100,000 (one-hundred thousand dollars), with interest from the date
written above until paid; at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum.

This Note, together with all interest due, is payable in full fifteen (15) days
from the date written above.

Maker shall reserve the right to prepay the principle of this Note, together
with all such accrued interest at the time of prepayment in whole or in part
prior to its due date without premium or penalty.

The Makers, signers, and endorsers of this Note severally waive, demand,
presentment, notice of dishonor, diligence in collection and notice of protest
and agree to all extensions and partial payments before or after maturity,
without prejudice to the holder. This written Note represents the final
agreement between the parties and may not be contradicted by evidence of prior,
contemporaneous, of subsequent oral agreements of the parties.

MAKER:  Heartsoft, Inc.                     ISSUER:  Hi-Tel Group, Inc.

/s/ Benjamin P Shell                        /s/ Steven Hirsch
Heartsoft, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,135,166
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,933,531
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,760,677
<PP&E>                                     116,128,961<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             130,918,174
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       43,363,143
<BONDS>                                    103,262,562
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   141,607,037
<OTHER-SE>                               (133,271,403)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               130,918,174
<SALES>                                     23,143,292
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,143,292
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               30,074,030
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               318,304
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,975,907
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,588,341)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,588,341)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
<FN>
<F1>Property, plant and equipment represents net amounts.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Exhibit 11.1


                                         MAYNARD OIL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                 Computations of Primary and Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share
                                           Three years ended December 31, 1996

                                                                                        Year ended
                                                                                       December 31,
COMPUTATIONS OF PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE         1996                 1995                1994
<S>                                              <C>                  <C>                <C>
Net income                                       $9,953,783           $3,023,107         $ 943,216

Weighted average common shares
  outstanding                                     4,889,690            4,890,708         4,891,592

Net income per common share                        $2.03567              $.61813           $.19282

COMPUTATIONS OF FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

Net income                                       $9,953,783           $3,023,107         $ 943,216

Weighted average common shares outstanding        4,889,690            4,890,708         4,891,592

Increase in weighted average common shares
  outstanding from assumed exercise of
  common stock options                                   --                    --           21,600

Weighted average common and common
  equivalent shares                               4,889,690            4,890,708         4,913,192

Net income per common and common
  equivalent shares                                $2.03567              $.61813           $.19198

</TABLE>