alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       479,772,000
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                 131,087,000
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             610,859,000
<CASH>                                      10,098,000
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                          24,114,000
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      85,168,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             888,057,000
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            133,713,000
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                        312,838,000
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                       23,388,000
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             69,838,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       911,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 257,091,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               888,057,000
<PREMIUMS>                                 400,991,000
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         25,292,000
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                           3,486,000
<OTHER-INCOME>                              39,357,000
<BENEFITS>                                 204,365,000
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                114,212,000
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        66,541,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             43,713,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                12,534,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         31,179,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                31,179,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     3.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.30
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              88,267,000
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                        211,066,000
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                         (10,178,000)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                         159,045,000
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                            40,785,000
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             89,325,000
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                   (10,178,000)


</TABLE>
#### Lynch *vs.*Andrews.

1. The service with an answer, served out of time, of the only notice of appearance for the defendant given in the action, indorsed thereon, may, where such notice waives an advantage of the defendant detrimental to the plaintiff’s proceedings—such as a misnomer—so far operate to render such an appearance *612contingent on the acceptance of such answer as served in time, as to render the retention of both a waiver of such irregularity, notwithstanding a verbal notice at the time of such service, and a subsequent written one, of a refusal by the plaintiff’s attorney to receive such answer; particularly where the latter has availed himself of such appearance by serving notice of assessment of damages on the attorney,

(Before Robertson, Ch. J.

at special term, February —, 1866.)
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4552 

To suspend temporarily the duty on l-Aspartic acid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2004 

Mr. BURNS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on l-Aspartic acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON l-ASPARTIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.29.01 l-Aspartic acid (CAS No. 

56–84–8) provided for in 

subheading 2922.49.40 ........ Free No Change No Change On or before 

12/31/2006 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 
2 

•HR 4552 IH 

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of Miller Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending April 30, 2015
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Angelo Napolitano,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: April 7, 2016                                                                  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/  Angelo Napolitano                                                                | 
|Angelo Napolitano
        Chief Executive Officer and
        Chief Financial Officer | 



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Miller Industries, Inc. and will be
returned by Miller Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order Granting Extension of Time 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19

- 0 4 23

______________________________________________ ____________________ STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CHARLES CLIFFORD HAMLIN

,

Defendant and Appellant.

__________________________________________________________ ________

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME

_______________________________________________________________ ___ Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and

good cause appearing therefor;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted a thirty (30)

day extension to file his Opening Brief, which shall be due on November

13 , 2020

.

SIGNED AND DATED AS INDICATED ABOVE.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 9 2020

10/09/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0423
EXHIBIT
        32.2
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
  **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Amendment to the Quarterly Report of Magnitude Information
        Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March
        31,
        2007 (the "Form 10-QSB"), I, Joerg H. Klaube, Chief Financial Officer of
        the
        Company, certify, as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
        as
        adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
        the
        best of my **** knowledge,
        that the Company's Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
        contained in the Form 10-QSB, fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the
        financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:
                  May 11, 2007
              /s/ Joerg H. KlaubeJoerg
                  H. Klaube, Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial  information  extracted from the balance
sheets and statements of income and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,170,883
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      259,130
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                           1,858,205
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,680,259
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,039,397
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,680,259
<SALES>                                            478,455
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,946,890
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,252,818
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   116,548
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    694,072
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                694,072
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       694,072
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         5.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         5.18
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.2





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS





As independent engineering consultants, Joe C. Neal & Associates, hereby consents to the use of the name Joe C. Neal & Associates and references to Joe C. Neal & Associates and to the inclusion of and references to our report, or information contained therein, entitled “Evaluation of Oil and Gas Reserves, Mexco Energy Corporation Annual Report Effective Date: March 31, 2013” prepared for Mexco Energy Corporation in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mexco Energy Corporation for the filing dated on or about July 1, 2013.





/s/ Joe C. Neal & Associates


JOE C. NEAL & ASSOCIATES,


PETROLEUM AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS





Midland, Texas


July 1, 2013
EXHIBIT 4.40


 


Deed of access, indemnity and
insurance – Mr John G Thorn


 


The
Deed of access, indemnity and insurance of Mr John G Thorn is incorporated by
reference to National Australia Bank Limited’s Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Commission
on January 20, 2005
Order entered August 2, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00240
- CV TIFFANY POLLARD, IND IVIDUALLY AND AS TRU STEE OF THE MARIE MERKEL CHILDRE N’S TRUST, Appella nt
V. RUPERT M. POLLARD, Appellee On Appeal from the 95th District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 18
- 12515



### O RDER Before the Court is appellee’s July 31, 2019 amended motion requesting an extension of time to August 23, 2019 to fil e his brief on the merits. By order dated July 26, 2019, the Court granted appellee’s prior motion and extended the deadline to August 23, 2019. Accordingly, we
DENY appellee’s amended motion as moot.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FORM
10-QSB.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                    JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                            2,127,908
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        59,792
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2,187,700
<PP&E>                                               93,337
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (13,894)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2,619,368
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               461,270
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             4,353,237
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                              6,915
<OTHER-SE>                                       (2,378,981)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2,619,368
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     13,331
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2,430,637
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (2,417,306)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (2,417,306)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (2,417,306)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.39)





</TABLE>
#### John Brown v. Sarah R. Haak and Sarah L. Hahn.

*Bequest for findings*— Error *not presumed.*

Requests for findings must be made before judgment. Circ. Ct. Rule 87.

Error must be affirmatively shown by the record; presumptions cannot be made for the purpose of founding it thereon.

Error to Lake.

Submitted April 6.

Decided April 25.

Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

Affirmed.

*J. Q. Patterson*and *M. Brown*for appellants.

*Beardsley da JudTcins*for appellees.

Marston, J.

There is no written finding of facts in this ■case, and the only question really open is whether the court erred in refusing to make such a finding. Whether the reasons assigned by the court for not finding the facts could be considered valid or not we need not determine, as it must first appear that a proper request was timely made for such .a finding. The record shows that the defendants’ attorney requested in writing such a finding, but it does not appear when this request was made, whether before or after judgment. The Rule, 87, requires the request to be made before judgment, and we cannot presume that a request was so *230made in order to found error thereon. The record must show error affirmatively, which it does not in this case.

The judgment must be affirmed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony E. Applebaum, Chief Executive Officer of Mera Pharmaceuticals, certify that (1) Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.s Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 3 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Date: Sept 09, 2009



| |                                           
| | ------------------------------------------
| | /s/ ANTHONY E. APPLEBAUM                  
| | Anthony E. Applebaum                      
| | Principal Financial and Accounting Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Renaissance Entertainment
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Charles S. Leavell, Chief Executive and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


                                     /s/ Charles S. Leavell
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Charles S. Leavell
                                     Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer
                                     August 14, 2002
NIST PSCR RESEARCH INVESTMENTS BOLSTER 

NEW JERSEY’S ECONOMY 

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Public Safety

Communications Research (PSCR) Division is the primary federal laboratory

focused on conducting research, development, testing, and evaluation for

public safety communications technologies. Their mission is to accelerate

communications innovation in support of public safety communities and the

citizens they serve.

The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 allocated $300 Million

from the Public Safety Trust fund to NIST PSCR to perform critical public safety

communications R&D during a 10-year period. PSCR implemented numerous

research mechanisms to support the development and deployment of the

Nationwide Public Safety Broadband Network: grants, Small Business Innovation

Research (SBIR) contracts, prize challenge competitions, and internal research.

These research mechanisms were housed within six research portfolios and crosscutting initiatives to maximize their impact:

•	 User Interface/User Experience •	 Public Safety Analytics

•	 Location-Based Services •	 Security

•	 Mission Critical Voice •	 Resilient Systems

While the ultimate impact of these research mechanisms is the increased safety

of first responders and their communities through improved communications

technologies, PSCR was interested in better understanding how their R&D

investments to date result in economic impacts that ripple outward to state

economies. An independent analysis was conducted to demonstrate how PSCR’s

deployment of the $300 Million from the Public Safety Trust Fund translated into

broader impacts to the United States, including jobs, earnings, value added, and

total economic output. PSCR’s R&D investments resulted in economic output

in 33 of the 50 states. Results of the analysis are presented here.

For more information, see NIST PSCR’s Economic Impact Study. 

4 Prize Challenge 

Participants 

Awards Totaling 

$0.2 Million 

3 Grant Awards 

Totaling $5.1 Million 

•	 Perspecta Labs Inc. 

•	 New Jersey Office of

Homeland Security and

Preparedness

•	 Misram LLC dba

Spectronn

NEW JERSEY BY THE NUMBERS 

NIST INVESTMENT 

$5.3 Million

OUTPUT 

$12.0 Million

VALUE-ADDED 

$20.0 Million

EARNINGS 

$11.2 Million

JOBS 

141 

Output: the total value of economic

activity circulating through the U.S.

economy generated by PSCR’s R&D

investments

Value-Added: how much the

combined U.S. state economies

grew over a period of time due to

PSCR’s R&D investments

Earnings: the change in household

earnings in the U.S. economy

generated by PSCR’s R&D

investments

Jobs: the change in the number of

full- and part-time jobs generated

by each one million dollar change

in U.S. economic activity due to

PSCR’s R&D investments

*All dollar amounts presented 

in 2022 and reflect data as of 

October 2022.

**All values are rounded; thus, the 

sum of the components may not 

sum exactly to the NIST Investment 

amount.

For additional information of PSCR’s research programs, visit https://www.nist.gov/ctl/pscr.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Mellon Financial Corporation
(the Corporation), hereby certifies that the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                               
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated: March 10, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Martin G. McGuinn                                         
|                      |  |  |  |                                                               
|                      |  |  |  | Name:    Martin G. McGuinn Title:      Chief Executive Officer
#### Blair et al. *v.*Rutenfranz.

APPEAL from the Daviess Circuit Court.

Downey, J.

The questions in this case, which is founded on an appeal bond given in an appeal in a liquor license *319case, are the same as in *Blair*v. *Kilpatrick,*ante,p. 312; and for the reasons there given the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded, with instructions to grant a new trial.

*D. F. Embree*and *W. M, Land,*for appellants.

*J. Baker,*for appellee.