alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 15,788.

#### Reddick et al. *v.*Lord et al.

*Win.*— Fee *Simple Estate.*— The *Word “ Heirs*” *Construed.*— Where a will gave a certain share of the testator’s real estate to his daughter, “ M. B., and her heirs (exclusively),” she took a fee-simple title to the real estate subject to be disposed of and conveyed by deed in which her hus- . band should join. The word “ heirs ” in the will is used in its technical legal sense, and vests a fee in the first taker.

From the Rush Circuit Court.

*337Filed April 21, 1892.

*M. E. Forkner, D. S. Morgan*and *D. Morris,*for appellants.

*B. L. Smith*and *C. Cambern,*for appellees.

Olds, J.

John Ruby, Sr., died testate, disposing of his property by an item in his will as follows:

> “ I will and bequeath to my wife, Margaret, one-third of all I possess, either real or personal, after all my just debts are paid, to be entirely at her disposal. The other two-thirds are to be equally divided among my four children, namely, Susanna Weasner, Margaret Isley, Caroline C. Barrett-and Mary Reddick, and her heirs ■ (exclusively)

The contention of the appellant in this case is that the devise to Mary Reddick conveyed to her only a life-estate and that the remainder vested in her.children to the exclusion of her husband, and that she had no power to convey the same by deed in which her husband joined, and that such deed was void and conveyed no title.

This contention can not be sustained. The language of the will is plain, and unnecessary to be construed. It gives to Mary Reddick a fee simple title to the real estate, subject to be disposed of and conveyed by deed in which her husband joins. It is a case which clearly comes within the rule in *Shelley’s Case.*The word *“*heirs *”*is used in its technical legal sense, and vests a fee in the first taker.

There is no error in the record.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Article Ref: J035

Measurement Matters, Vol. 11, Issue 4 October 2021 Page 1

Demand for Webinar Offerings Continues to Grow 

Byline: David Sefcik

Progress continues to be made to meet the needs of the state, county, and local weights and measures, as 

well as other stakeholders to provide virtual training. 

This past fiscal year (October 1, 2020 – September 30, 2021), 1,742 students participated in webinars 

offered by the Laws and Metric Group, NIST Office of Weights and Measures. This represented a 12

percent increase in attendance over the prior fiscal year. In addition, we were able to add two new 

webinar offerings, “How to Test Packages of Mulch and Soils Labeled by Volume” and “LPG (Propane) 

– Verifying the Net Contents of 20 lb Cylinders (Part 1)”. Below is the breakdown of the number and 

types of webinar offerings delivered this fiscal year:

9 Weights and Measures Inspections – Evidence, Search & Seizure, and Due Process 

7 How to Test Animal Bedding 

6 Examination Procedure for Price Verification 

6 Overview of NIST Handbook 133 

5 Overview of the Uniform Packaging and Labeling Regulation 

3 LPG (Propane) – Verifying the Net Contents of 20 lb Cylinders (Part 1) 

1 How to Test Packages of Mulch and Soils Labeled by Volume (“on demand”)

Webinars are offered based on demand, but typically no less than once a quarter. A total of 37 webinars 

were presented last fiscal year. Eighty-six (86) percent of participants were state, county, or local 

officials, and 10 percent of participants were from industry. 

There has been an increasing interest among the international weights and measures community who 

comprised 4 percent of the participants. International weights and measures included representation from 

across the Americas (Belize, Bolivia, Canada, Chile, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Uruguay), the Caribbean 

(Bahamas, Barbados, Haiti, Jamacia, St. Lucia, Trinidad, and Tobago), as well as from Africa (Nigeria),

and Asia (China). 

Our goal is to meet the needs of and help support your weights and measures programs and provide 

relevant training for your staff. We are currently evaluating which webinars are most needed by officials 

for the upcoming year and beyond. 
Article Ref: J035

Measurement Matters, Vol. 11, Issue 4 October 2021 Page 2

We value and encourage your input. Please email your suggestions and recommendations to David 

Sefcik at david.sefcik@nist.gov. In addition, please feel free to address general training queries to 

OWM@nist.gov or phone (301) 975-4004 for additional assistance and information.
**Exhibit        32**

**STRATFORD          AMERICAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES**

**CERTIFICATION          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT**

**TO          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                                                                                                                  |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Mel                L. Shultz                                                                                 |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                       |   |   |        |
| Mel L.                  Shultz,                  President                  and                  DirectorMay 15, 2006 |   |   |   |

|                                                                                                                                         |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ David                    H. Eaton                                                                                                   |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                              |   |   |        |
| David                      H. Eaton,                      Chief Executive Officer and                      Chairman of the BoardMay 15, 2006 |   |   |   |

|                                                                                                                                     |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Daniel                      E. Matthews                                                                                         |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                          |   |   |        |
| Daniel                        E. Matthews,                        Controller, Secretary and                        TreasurerMay 15, 2006 |   |   |   |
10915.

#### TOWLER *v.*THE STATE.

The discretion of the trial judge in overruling an extraordinary motion for a new trial will not, unless manifestly abused, be interfered with by this court. No such abuse of discretion appears in this case.

Decided November 4, 1919.

Conviction of assault with intent to rape; from Gwinnett superior court—Judge Cobb. September 5, 1919. .

*Kelley & Kelley, 0. A. 'Nix,*W. *L. Nix, John R. Cooper,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. 0. Dean, solicitor-general, N. L. Hutchins,*contra.

Luke, J.

All extraordinary motions for new trial are addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge, and this court can not reverse a judgment of a trial judge in overruling such a motion, unless his discretion has been manifestly abused. We cannot say, in view of the precedents of the Supreme Court by which we are bound, that the trial judge, in hearing the showing and counter-showing upon the extraordinary motion, has manifestly abused the discretion with which by law he is charged. See, in this connection, *Brown*v. *State,*141 *Ga.*783 (82 S. E. 238), and cases cited. The case as originally made was weak, but there was some evidence to authorize the verdict. Necessarily this court must depend upon the trial courts, who have the parties and witnesses before them, to unreservedly approve or disapprove verdicts had in the trial court. The exercise of a discretion by a trial judge where the liberty of a human being is involved is a solemn duty, and where so exercised it must appear that such discretion has been manifestly abused before this court can set a judgment aside, which is the result of a conclusion reached in the exercise of such discretion.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
Journey to the NIST CSF 2.0

September 19, 2023
Dr. Charles Romine

Associate Director for Laboratory Programs, NIST

Journey to the NIST CSF 2.0
STAY IN TOUCH

CONTACT US

NIST.gov @NISTcyber
Journey to the NIST CSF 2.0

September 19, 2023
Start Time (EDT) Session Name/Information

9:00 AM Welcome

9:05 AM Opening Remarks

9:10 AM Workshop Overview

9:15 AM Panel #1 - Conversation on CSF 2.0 Draft

10:05 AM Break

10:25 AM Panel #2 - Governance

11:15 AM Break

11:25 PM Panel #3 - Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management

12:15 PM Lunch

1:30 PM Panel #4 - Guidance on CSF 2.0 Implementation

2:20 PM Break

2:40 PM Panel #5 - Informative References

3:30 PM Break

3:40 PM Closing Remarks

4:00 PM Workshop Ends

September 19, 2023: CSF 2.0
Conversation on CSF 2.0 Draft

Panel 1
CSF Update | Journey to CSF 2.0 

Ways to engage: www.nist.gov/cyberframework
Journey to the NIST CSF 2.0

September 19, 2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Maui
Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1997 and the
Statement of Operations for the year then ended, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,611
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,315
<ALLOWANCES>                                       567
<INVENTORY>                                     18,713
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,148
<PP&E>                                         199,593
<DEPRECIATION>                                 111,972
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 134,714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,865
<BONDS>                                         29,435
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,318
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,578
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   134,714
<SALES>                                        101,421
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               136,498
<CGS>                                           72,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   98,227
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,045
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,362
<INCOME-TAX>                                       499
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                863
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       863
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48
        

</TABLE>
#### John H. Ford *v.*Jno. M. Rice, etc.

Arbitration and Award — Judgment on Award.

Under § 6, subsec. 3, cb. 3, R. S., relating to awards by arbitrators, judgment can not be rendered on an award, unless tbe provisions1 of tbe statute have been complied with.

Judgment — By Confession.

Where the parties to an action consented to. submission of the controversy to arbitrators without an answer by defendant, the failure to answer did not entitle plaintiffs to a judgment by confession.

Arbitration and Award — Failure to Answer — Overruling Exceptions to Award.

Where the parties to a suit submitted the controversy to arbitrators without answer by defendant, an answer could avail defendant nothing, where his exceptions to the award are overruled, unless'he attempted to impeach the award on some equitable ground.

APPEAL FROM BOYD CIRCUIT COURT.

January 31, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay :

The report of the arbitrators shows that a copy of their award was not delivered to appellant, and there is nothing in the record indicating a waiver of the right to require a copy thereof upon his part. Subsec. 3, Sec. 6, Chapter 3, Revised Statutes, provides that, “When the award is made out, one copy thereof shall be delivered to each of the contending parties and the original returned to the court, on which the arbitrators shall note the time of déliv-ering a copy to each party.”

Until this is done the court can not proceed to1 render judgment enforcing the finding of the arbitrators, unless the parties waive or have waived their right to insist that the statute shall be obeyed. Appellant’s exception as to the failure of the arbitrators to observe this provision of the law should have been sustained and the award set aside.

The failure of appellant to answer did not entitle appellees to judgment by confession. .

They consented to submit the controversy to, arbitrators without an answer from him, and when his exceptions to the award were overruled an answer would have availed him nothing, unless he had attempted to impeach it upon, some equitable ground. He may *410not have been able to do this and he has a right still to answer and have the matters in litigation settled by the court.

*Dulin, James, for appellant.*

*Ireland, G. N. Brown, Jones, for appellee.*

Judgment reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned,  Anthony J. Miceli, Chief Financial
Officer of United  Capital Corp.  (the  "Company"),  does hereby  certify,  with
respect to the Annual  Report of the  Company on Form 10-K for the period  ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report") that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  March 21, 2005

                                 /s/ Anthony J. Miceli
                                 ---------------------------------
                                 Anthony J. Miceli
                                 Chief Financial Officer
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# AGENCY:

Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the appointment of the members of the Senior Executive Service Performance Review Boards for the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board. The purpose of the Performance Review Boards is to make written recommendations on annual summary ratings to the appointing authority on the performance of senior executives.

# DATES:

This notice is effective November 18, 2014.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kelly Powell, HR Specialist, at 202-942-1681.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Title 5, U.S. Code, 4314(c)(4), requires that the appointment of Performance Review Board members be published in the                     **Federal Register**                     before Board service commences. The following persons will serve on the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board's Performance Review Boards which will review initial summary ratings to ensure the ratings are consistent with established performance requirements, reflect meaningful distinctions among senior executives based on their relative performance and organizational results and provide recommendations for ratings, awards, and pay adjustments in a fair and equitable manner: Jay Ahuja, Jim Courtney, Susan Crowder, Thomas Emswiler, Tracey Ray, Renee Wilder.                

Megan Grumbine,

Deputy General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

[FR Doc. 2014-27607 Filed 11-20-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, James M. Seneff, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income  Fund V, Ltd.  (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 (the "Report"). The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





Date:    November 8, 2002                        /s/ James M. Seneff, Jr.
     ----------------------                      ----------------------------
                                                 Name:  James M. Seneff, Jr.
                                                 Title: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Siebert Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Joseph M. Ramos, Jr., in my capacity as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report
filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
covered by the report.

|                         |  |                    
|------------------------ |  | -------------------
|                         |  |                    
|/s/ Joseph M. Ramos, Jr. |  | Date: June 12, 2012
|                         |  |                    
|Joseph M. Ramos, Jr.     |  |                    
|Chief
 Financial Officer |  |                    
|                         |  |                    

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other documents authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by section
906, has been provided to Siebert Financial Corp. and will be retained by
Siebert Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

---
**Exhibit23**

** **

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

** **

We consent to the incorporationby reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-121705, 333-119808, and 333-112932on Form S-8 of our report, dated March 3, 2006, relating to theconsolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of MauiLand & Pineapple Company, Inc. and subsidiaries, appearing in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

 
| /s/ DELOITTE &  TOUCHE LLP |   |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                |   |
| Honolulu, Hawaii                    |   |
| March 3, 2006                  |   |

 

----
<PAGE>   1
   
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3
    

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

   
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this registration statement on
Form S-3 (File No. 333-45127) of WorldCom, Inc. of our reports dated February
14, 1996, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of MFS
Communications Company, Inc. as of December 31, 1995 and 1994 and for each of
the three and two years in the period ended December 31, 1995 which reports are
included in WorldCom Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated August 25, 1996
(as amended on November 4, 1996 and December 19, 1997).  We also consent to the
reference to our firm under the caption "Experts."
    

   
                                        COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
    

   
Omaha, Nebraska
    

   
June 12, 1998