alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification**

I, Michael Gooch,certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis Annual Report on Form 10-K of GFI Group Inc.;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)               designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)              evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)               disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a)               all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)              anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date:  March 23, 2006 |
|---------------------------------|
| /s/ MICHAEL GOOCH               |
| Michael Gooch                   |
| Chairman of the  Board,         |
| Chief Executive  Officer        |

 

----
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<RESTATED>
[LEGEND]
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER
     ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
[/LEGEND]
<MULTIPLIER>                              1
<CURRENCY>                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                              104,182
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                       790,851
<ALLOWANCES>                         50,000
<INVENTORY>                         805,544
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  1,825,934
<PP&E>                            5,897,282
<DEPRECIATION>                    2,323,757
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    7,159,041
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             2,123,010
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             66,850
<OTHER-SE>                        3,127,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      7,159,041
<SALES>                           6,304,621
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          0
<CGS>                             4,469,771
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  1,485,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  165,628
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     183,922
<INCOME-TAX>                          2,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 181,422
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        181,422
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .02
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                           JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                         237
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   15
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 0
<PP&E>                                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            0
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     340
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   371
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               109
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   25
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 84
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             84
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    84
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 9.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0
        

</TABLE>
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS


EX-32.2


Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Anthony E. Applebaum, Chief Executive Officer of Mera Pharmaceuticals, certify that (1) Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.s Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 3 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.   Date:   September 14, 2006  /s/ANTHONY E. APPLEBAUM ---------------------------------------- Anthony E. Applebaum Principal Financial and Accounting Officer    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Mera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES STYNE HASKINS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 301 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of April, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.

Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
#### Frank Mayer and Robert A. Kirchner v. Robert M. Soulier, Adeline C. Hotchkiss, Robert J. King and George *W.*Hawley.

*Chattel mortgage*— Rights *of assignee.*

The assignee under a *bona fide*mortgagee *oí*chattels is entitled to the same protection as the mortgagee in an action of replevin brought-by a claimant of the goods.

Error to Superior Court of Detroit.

Submitted April 5.

Decided June 14.

Replevin by Mayer & Kirchner for goods sold to the defendant Robert J. King, who did not pay for them, hut mortgaged them to Alexander Toll, from whom they were purchased, subject to Toll’s mortgage, by the defendant Adeline C. Hotchkiss, who was a creditor of King’s, and who afterwards purchased the mortgage for her own protection. Defendants bring error.

Reversed.

*Henry M. Gheever*for appellants.

*Griffin, Dickinson, Thurber c& Hosmer*for appellees.

Marston, J.

Error is so-clearly apparent in that portion *412of tbe charge of the court relating to the rights of the ■defendant Hotchkiss under the Toll mortgage* that a new trial must be ordered.

It was conceded that the mortgage to Toll was in his hands valid, and that his rights thereunder would have been fully protected. That being so his assignee was equally entitled to protection to that extent, and this for the reasons net forth in *Kost v. Bender*25 Mich. 516. The other questions we do not consider it necessary to discuss.

The judgment must be reversed with costs and a new trial ordered.

G-raves, C. J. and Cooley, J. concurred.

Campbell, J". did not sit in this case.

*

*Court.*“Iam asked to charge you ‘that Mrs. Hotchkiss is entitled to all the rights of Alexander Toll, and plaintiffs cannot recover as to the goods covered by the chattel mortgage.’ By that, I suppose, you mean the Toll chattel mortgage?”

*Defendants Counsel.*“Yes, your honor.”

*Court.*“I will so instruct you, with this modification: If, at the time they were acquiring this right from Toll, they knew or had notice that those goods really belonged to the plaintiffs in this case, and knew it at the time, of course they acquired that right at tlieir risk, and they must abide by that. But if they acquired it without any such notice, then, of course, gentlemen of the jury, they would be relegated to all the rights of Toll. But this transaction being all one thing, it is for you to consider whether they could have acquired the Toll mortgage without notice. In other words, it is all one transaction, and you may determine, if you do determine as a matter of fact, as to whether they could have acquired the Toll mortgage without notice and yet have gone through the rest of the transaction with notice. It seems to me rather difficult. If you find they acquired the Toll mortgage without inquiring, without anything to put them upon inquiry, it seems to me you would find great difficulty in holding them liable at all. So that I simply instruct you that they would have all the rights under the Toll mortgage unless they had notice and knew at the time they acquired it, the true state of things, or had reason to know the true state of things between King & Co. and the plaintiffs in this case.”
United States Department of Commerce

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For:

Maryland

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international system of units (SI), documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully 

completed training and proficiency tests, documented calibration intervals, submitted a quality management system, and 

demonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate.

The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State 

Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope

Mass Echelon III

20 kg to 1 mg

50 lb to 0.001 lb

8 oz to 0.03125 oz

Volume Transfer, II

5 gal

(Rev.: September 2021)

2022

____________________________________

Katrice Lippa, Chief

NIST Office of Weights and Measures

Effective Dates: 2022-02-01 to 2023-02-01
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE APRIL
30, 1997 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                          20,662
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  458,477<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    590,014
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,099,293
<PP&E>                                         132,638<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,331,995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          212,719
<BONDS>                                        465,752
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           357
<OTHER-SE>                                     533,253
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,331,995
<SALES>                                        980,238
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               980,238
<CGS>                                          502,009
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  502,009
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,184
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 77,158
<INCOME-TAX>                                    28,225
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             48,933
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    48,933
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.40<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.34<F2>
<FN>
<F1>This asset value represents a net amount.
<F2>The amount reported for EPS primary and fully diluted is in compliance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings Per Share," and
represents the Basic and Diluted calculation as required by this standard.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
   
     We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to
the use of our report dated February 18, 1998 (except for Note 15, as to which
the date is July 10, 1998), in Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement
(Form S-1 No. 333-56799) and related Prospectus of Clark/Bardes, Inc. (the
predecessor company to Clark/Bardes Holdings, Inc.) for the registration of
shares of its common stock.
    
 
                                                  /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                     ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Dallas, Texas
   
August 10, 1998
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.6


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

   
           We consent to the inclusion in this registration statement on Form
S-1 (File No. 333-48819, Amendment No. 2) of our report dated February 3, 1997,
on our audit of the consolidated financial statements of Midcontinent
Broadcasting Co. of Wisconsin, Inc. We also consent to the reference to our firm
under the caption "Experts".
    



                                            COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

   
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
May 8, 1998
NVLAP LAB BULLETIN NUMBER: LB-150-2023 Page 1 of 1

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology

National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

ISSUE DATE:

July 18, 2023

LAB BULLETIN

NUMBER: LB-150-2023

LAP: Energy Efficient 

Lighting Products

SUBJECT: Calibration of Phase in Power Meters

The purpose of this bulletin is to notify lighting laboratories of phase calibration requirements for 

power meters.

Phase calibration is an important aspect of power meter calibration. Some calibrations indicate 

direct calibration of phase angle and others indicate calibration of power and power factor. 

Calibration certificates that indicate phase calibration at a single angle (commonly zero degrees) or 

power factor at a single value (commonly PF =1) are not acceptable. Since power factor is a cosine 

function, an error in phase at zero degrees will be minimal compared to any error in the voltage 

and current measurements. At 90 degrees or PF = 0, an error in phase becomes more obvious. For 

example, an equipment manufacturer calibrates power meters at zero degrees as well as both a 

lead and lag of 90 degrees, and ANSI C12 requires calibration at both zero and -60 degrees.

To summarize, the methods for which NVLAP accredits do not include requirements for specific 

phase angles or power factors for calibration. Therefore, NVLAP is not stating which additional 

phase angles or power factors must be included in calibration. However, calibration at a single 

phase angle of zero degrees or PF = 1 is not acceptable, and some examples of additional 

parameters have been given above.

For one year from the issuance of this lab bulletin assessors will cite a comment when an 

unacceptable calibration is found. After one year, assessors will cite a nonconformity.

Questions should be directed to Tim Rasinski at 301-975-6697 or timothy.rasinski@nist.gov.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
REGISTRANT'S  UNAUDITED  BALANCE SHEET AS OF NOVEMBER 30, 1998 AND THE UNAUDITED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS  AND  STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS THEN
ENDED  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN  ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                          0000835585
<NAME>                C-Phone Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                            1
<CURRENCY>                            USD
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  NOV-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                          5,636,599
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     487,174
<ALLOWANCES>                     (204,632)
<INVENTORY>                     1,648,792
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                7,684,687
<PP&E>                          1,185,771
<DEPRECIATION>                 (1,064,682)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  7,914,098
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             856,506
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           79,786
<OTHER-SE>                      6,977,806
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    7,914,098
<SALES>                         1,317,956
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,346,776
<CGS>                           1,729,031
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,738,705
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 (134,697)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (2,975,756)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (2,975,756)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                   (2,975,756)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.44)
                                         

</TABLE>
General: Federal involvement in standards setting has often been uncoordinated between 

Commerce, Defense, State and specialized executive agencies. Industry original equipment 

/software makers most often supports standards bodies with technical expertise while providing 

a bias toward the particular firm’s current or emerging product. This has resulted in five issues: 

1. difficulty discerning what standard meets the best technical outcome and the US best interests 

or preferred policy outcome. 

2. no coordinated effort to optimize international standards to the nation’s needs in contrast with 

EU, Japan and soon, China. 

3. fragmenting of industry effort in advocacy groups for specific standards which support that 

group’s current and emerging technology products. 

4. not harnessing the expertise of small firms, academia and many government STEM workers 

5. disconnects between national and international standards which reduce our ability to 

interoperate internally and with other nations and which impair our ability to compete 

internationally. 

We recognize the imperative of profit ; the excessive time to develop standards and that 

standards, by definition lag innovation. I believe the issues should be addressed by : 

1. having a lead federal agency for type standards 

2. developing a working, quick consensus on standards and the policy/outcome basis, while 

looking at emerging technologies 

3. within government, requiring interoperability with standards, while the market place weighs 

new technologies. 

Please contact me if I can be of assistance.

Tommy T. Osborne

CTO/ VP IT Solutions

Maden Technologies

A Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business

2110 Washington Boulevard, Suite 200

Arlington, VA 22204

tosborne@madentech.com