alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JAMES VILSAINT

,

Petitioner

,

v. Case No. 5D 18

- 42

ST ATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent

. ________________________________/

Opinion filed February 2, 2018

Petition for Belated Appeal A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Robert Wesley, Public Defender, Orlando, and Steven S. Graves, Assistant Public Defender, Orlan do, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed

with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the November 30, 2017

judgment s and sentence s in C ase N o. 2016

- CF

- 11551

- O

, in the Circuit Court in and for

Orange County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)( 6 )(D).

PETITION GRANTED

.

TORPY, BERGER and EISNAUGLE

, JJ., concur.
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 397

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT

To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of 

construction of a hydroelectric project in the State of Illinois.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 397 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY 

2 REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT. 

3 Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 

4 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 

5 otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Com6 mission project numbered 11214, the Commission may, at 

7 the request of the licensee for the project, and after rea8 sonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due dili9 gence, and public interest requirements of that section and 

10 the Commission’s procedures under that section—

11 (1) reinstate the license for the construction of 

12 the project as of the effective date of the surrender 

13 of the license; and 

14 (2) extend the time period during which the li15 censee is required to commence the construction of 

16 the project for 3 consecutive 2-year periods beyond 

17 the date that is 4 years after the date of issuance 

18 of the license.

Passed the House of Representatives February 11, 

2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuantto Rules 13A-14 and 15D-14**

**Of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934**

 

I,Thomas S. Bednarik, President and Chief Executive Officer of Time America, Inc.(the “Company”), certify that:

(1)           Ihave reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2004 (the “Report”);

(2)           Basedon my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by the Report; and

(3)           Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periodsrepresented in the Report.

(4)           TheCompany’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

(a)           designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theCompany, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report isbeing prepared;

(b)           evaluated the effectiveness of theCompany’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in the Report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by the Report based on such evaluation; and

(c)           disclosed in the Report any change inthe Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

(5)           TheCompany’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’sauditors and to the audit committee of the board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

(a)           all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)           any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theCompany’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated:    November 15, 2004

 
| By:    | /s/ Thomas S. Bednarik                 |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Thomas S. Bednarik                     |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<MULTIPLIER>    1

<S>                                           <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  Sep-30-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       9-mos
<CASH>                                            816,437
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      91,549
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  944,435
<PP&E>                                          8,504,017
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,528,009
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  6,859,725
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             494,092
<BONDS>                                         4,083,163
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                      1,580,570
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    6,859,725
<SALES>                                           853,893
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  881,182
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     607,401
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  312,055
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                264,106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (190,999)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (190,999)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (190,999)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Clover
Appreciation Properties I, L.P. 1996 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in
its entirety be reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000837103
<NAME> CLOVER APPRECIATION PROPERTIES I L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         145,231
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,957
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,871,170<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,871,940
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,610,949<F2>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (547,905)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,871,940
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,236,580
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,906,535
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             516,875
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (669,955)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (184.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Investment property held for sale totalling $7,655,000 is included in current assets.
<F2>Bonds of $7,343,441 mature July of 1997 and are included in current
liabilities.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,069
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,632
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (210)
<INVENTORY>                                     10,909
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,617
<PP&E>                                          13,912
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,100)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,363
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            70
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,417
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,842
<SALES>                                         15,684
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,750
<CGS>                                           10,971
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,508
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   259
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     2
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 321
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,689
<INCOME-TAX>                                       350
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,339
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,339
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19
        

</TABLE>
MODIFY and AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed July 29, 2014.

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 1 4

- 0 0 420

- CR

DANNY RAY TEMPLETON , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee
On Appeal from the Crimin al Distri ct Court No. 2 Dalla s County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 12

- 70535

- I


### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Fillmore, Evans, and Lewis Opinion b y Justice Lewis Danny Ray Templeton appeals from the adjudication of his guilt for aggravated assault. In a single issue, appellant contends the trial court’s judgment should be modified to reflect the correct statute for the charged offense. The State agrees that the judgment should be modified as appellant requests. We modify the trial court’s judgment and affirm as modified.

The trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt incorrectly identifies the statute for the

offense as “481.115 Health and Safety Code.” Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon under section 22.02 of the Texas Penal Code. See T EX

. P EN AL C ODE A NN

. § 22.02(a)(2) (West 2011 ). Thus, the judgment is incorrect. We sustain appellant’s sole issue.- 2

- We further note the judgment incorrectly states that the degree of the offense is a state jail felony. Aggravated assault with a deadly weapon i s a second

- degree felony offense. Id

. § 22.02(b). We modify the judgment adjudicating guilt to show the statute for the offense is “22.02(a) Penal Code” and the degree of the offense is “s econd

- degree felony.” See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v. Stat e , 865 S.W.2d 26, 27

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Asberry v. State , 813 S.W.2d 526, 529

– 30 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 1991, pet. ref’d).
As modified, w e affirm the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt

.

Do Not P ublish T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47

140420F.U05 /David Lewis/ DAVID LEWIS JUSTICE- 3

- 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

JUDGMENT

DANNY RAY TEMPLETON , Appellant

No. 05

- 14

- 00420

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dal las County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F12

- 70535

- I). Opinion delivered by Justice Lewis, Justices Fillmore and Evans participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt is MODIFIED as follows:
The section title d “Statute for Offense” is modified to show “22.02(a) Penal Code.” The section titled “Degree” is modified to show “Second Degree Felony.” As modified, we AFFIRM the judgment adjudicating guilt.

Judgment entered July 29, 2014.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-20613

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOHAN DARIO REYES-HOBBS, also known as Johan Dario Reyes, also known

as Dario Johan Reyes, also known as Johan David Reyes, also known as Johan

Dari Reyes,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:09-CR-146-1

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Johan Dario Reyes-Hobbs

presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. CepedaRios, 530 F.3d 333, 335-36 (5th Cir. 2008), which held that even after Lopez v.

Gonzales, 549 U.S. 47 (2006), a second state conviction for simple possession of

a controlled substance qualifies as an aggravated felony that supports the

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 12, 2010

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

Case: 09-20613 Document: 00511027499 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/12/2010
No. 09-20613

2

imposition of an eight-level enhancement under United States Sentencing

Guideline § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Case: 09-20613 Document: 00511027499 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/12/2010
#### Elfrida JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Mike PONDER; Larry D. Book; Metropolitan Council, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-30479.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Jan. 17, 2004.

Elfrida Johnson, New Orleans, LA, pro se.

Dawn N. Guillot, Parish Attorney’s Office for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, Baton Rouge, LA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Elfrida Johnson claims discrimination and violation of the Fair Housing Act and the Louisiana Equal Housing Opportunity Act in the refusal of defendants to sell her a certain lot, as well as in the financing of the purchase. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants, concluding under the undisputed facts that Johnson was attempting to purchase a certain lot on which a house was located, but the city did not own that lot.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 520

Congratulating Mark McGwire of the St. Louis Cardinals for breaking the

Major League Baseball single-season home run record.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 9, 1998

Mr. TALENT submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

RESOLUTION

Congratulating Mark McGwire of the St. Louis Cardinals

for breaking the Major League Baseball single-season

home run record.

Whereas the game of baseball is America’s national pastime;

Whereas one of the grandest records in baseball, and indeed

in all sport, is the record for the most home runs hit in

a single Major League Baseball season;

Whereas during the 1998 Major League Baseball season,

Mark McGwire of the St. Louis Cardinals and other fine

players have challenged the Major League Baseball single-season home run record, bringing great excitement to

the 1998 Major League Baseball season and capturing

the imagination of the people of the United States and

baseball fans around the world;
2

•HRES 520 IH

Whereas Mark McGwire of the St. Louis Cardinals has been

subjected to intense pressure and media scrutiny, but has

conducted himself with uncommon grace, class, and dignity, and has been a first-rate role model for the young

people of St. Louis, the State of Missouri, and the United

States; and

Whereas on September 8, 1998, Mark McGwire of the St.

Louis Cardinals hit his 62nd home run of the 1998

Major League Baseball season, breaking the Major

League Baseball single-season home run record: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates and commends Mark McGwire of the St. Louis

3 Cardinals—

4 (1) for breaking the Major League Baseball sin5 gle-season home run record;

6 (2) for bringing great excitement to the 1998

7 Major League Baseball season; and

8 (3) for being an inspiration to the youth of

9 America and the world and baseball fans everywhere.

Æ
EXHIBIT A

Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 25-1 Filed: 10/28/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:243
AO 440 (Rev. 05/00) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL CASE

CASE NUMBER:

V. ASSIGNED JUDGE:

DESIGNATED 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE:

TO: (Name and address of Defendant)

YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to serve upon PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEY (name and address)

an answer to the complaint which is herewith served upon you, days after service of this

summons upon you, exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for

the relief demanded in the complaint. You must also file your answer with the Clerk of this Court within a reasonable

period of time after service.

GRACIE HENDERSON

 WAYNE FARMS LLC

JOHN DOE a/k/a GRACIE 

HENDERSON a/k/a

FRANK L ANNESE and 

LINKEDIN CORPORATION

20-cv-05191

Feinerman

Valdez

21

Ladas & Parry LLP

David C. Brezina

Boris Umansky

224 S Michigan Ave, #1600

Chicago, IL 60604

Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 25-1 Filed: 10/28/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:244
AO 440 (Rev. 05/00) Summons in a Civil Action

RETURN OF SERVICE

Service of the Summons and complaint was made by me(1)

DATE

NAME OF SERVER (PRINT) TITLE

 Check one box below to indicate appropriate method of service

G Served personally upon the defendant. Place where served:

G Left copies thereof at the defendant’s dwelling house or usual place of abode with a person of suitable age and

discretion then residing therein.

Name of person with whom the summons and complaint were left:

G Returned unexecuted:

G Other (specify):

STATEMENT OF SERVICE FEES

TRAVEL SERVICES TOTAL

DECLARATION OF SERVER

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information 

contained in the Return of Service and Statement of Service Fees is true and correct.

Executed on

Date Signature of Server

Address of Server

(1) As to who may serve a summons see Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 25-1 Filed: 10/28/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:245