alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
**Exhibit 32.1

   Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

         The undersigned hereby certify that, to the best of his knowledge,
based upon his review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
April 30, 2003, of Miller Industries, Inc. (the "Report"), that:

(i)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
         respects the financial condition and results of operations of the
         Registrant as of and for the periods presented in the Report.

Date:  September 30, 2003                         /s/  Angelo Napolitano
                                                       Angelo Napolitano
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                                       And Chief Financial Officer
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE OCTOBER
31, 1995 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1995
<CASH>                                          72,728
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  392,656<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    494,928
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               992,865
<PP&E>                                          83,516<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,165,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          292,562
<BONDS>                                        380,705
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           350
<OTHER-SE>                                     382,735
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,165,047
<SALES>                                        214,274
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               214,274
<CGS>                                          110,170
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  110,170
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,906
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,840
<INCOME-TAX>                                       653
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,187
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,096)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        91
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>This asset value represents a net amount.
<F2>The amount reported for EPS primary and fully diluted is in compliance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings Per Share," and
represents the Basic and Diluted calculation as required by this standard.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT


1.    Gart Bros. Sporting Goods Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of Gart
      Sports Company.

2.    Sportmart, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Gart Bros. Sports Goods
      Company.

3.    Colorado Wholesale Sporting Goods Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of
      Gart Bros. Sporting Goods Company.

4.    Sportdepot Stores Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Sportmart, Inc.

5.    Thaxton Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of Sportmart, Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4083 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4083

     To suspend temporarily the duty on p-nitrobenzoic acid (PNBA).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 31, 2004

  Mr. Baker introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on p-nitrobenzoic acid (PNBA).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON P-NITROBENZOIC ACID (PNBA).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.34.31       p-nitrobenzoic     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         acid (CAS No. 62-                                                  31/2008
                         23-7) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2916.39.75)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NIGHTINGALE
INC'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                            $345
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               194,170
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 194,170
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          288,641
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        20,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   194,170
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,383
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,854
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (471)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PONDER
INDUSTRIES, INC.'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MAY 31, 1998, AND ITS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                             362
<SECURITIES>                                       720
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,842
<ALLOWANCES>                                       669
<INVENTORY>                                      5,319
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,912
<PP&E>                                          38,054
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,119
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,138
<BONDS>                                          5,342
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           445
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,684
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,528
<SALES>                                         15,649
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,649
<CGS>                                            6,371
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,076
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    52
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,273
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,698)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,698)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,698)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>
10684.

#### Georgia Grocery Company *v.*Brunson.

Jenkins, P. J.

While it is true that a married woman who personally applies to a tradesman for the purchase of groceries, stating that she wishes to open an account in her own name, and directs the plaintiff to charge the goods to her, will be personally liable therefor, where in pursuance of such express understanding the goods are delivered and charged to her *(Bell*v. *Rossignol,*143 *Ga.*150, 84 S. E. 542, L. R. A. 1915D, 1184, Ann. Cas. 19170, 576; *Goodson*v. *Powell,*9 *Ga. App.*497, 71 S. E. 765; *Smith*v. *Brown,*16 *Ga. App.*608, 85 S. E. 950), still the husband is bound to support and maintain the wife, and where necessaries are furnished to the wife in the absence of any such express agreement, the presumption is that she contracted for them in the right of her general agency for her husband, and that he, and not she, is liable. Civil Code (1910), § 2996; *Wrightsville & Tennille R. Co.*v. *Vaughan,*9 *Ga. App.*371, 378 (71 S. E. 691); *Oliver*v. *Webb,*12 *Ga. App.*216 (76 S. E. 1081). This is true even though the creditor may have himself intended to credit the wife and not the husband, unless it be that such intention was expressly declared or communicated to the wife. *Rushing*v. *Clancy,*92 *Ga.*769 (19 S. E. 711). There being a contested issue of fact for the jury in this case, as to whether or not the credit was expressly given to the wife, the judgment of the *485superior court sustaining the certiorari and granting a first new trial will not be disturbed. *Mitchell*v. *Treanor,*11 *Ga.*324 (4) (56 Am. D. 421); *Weathersby*v. *Jordan,*124 *Ga.*68 (52 S. E. 83); *Loftin*v. *Great Southern Home Ben. Asso.,*9 *Ga. App.*121 (70 S. E. 353).

Decided November 19, 1919.

Certiorari; from Laurens superior court—Judge Kent. May 1, 1919.

*M. H. Blctchshear,*for plaintiff in error.

*Larsen & Crockett,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.*
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 33-44373) and S-8 (33-44374, 33-44375 and 333-90307)
of Mercantile Bankshares Corporation of our report dated January 28, 2003
(except as it relates to Note 22, as to which the date is March 14, 2003)
relating to the financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to
Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Baltimore, Maryland
March 26, 2003
#### P. T. German, etc., *v.*Muldoom & Bullitt & Co.

Contracts — Written Instrument — Names in Body — Delivery—Presumption — Burden of Proof.

The fact that the writing is in the possession of the appellees, raises the legal presumption that it was delivered to them by the parties that did sign it, and it was, therefore, incumbent upon them to rebut this presumption or to establish that appellees undertook to procure the signatures of all the parties mentioned in the body of the writing.

Contracts — By Committee — Personal Undertaking.

The appellants are described in the writing as a committee but their undertaking to pay the agreed price for the monument is personal in its character.

APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.

May 10, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

There is nothing in the written agreement upon which this suit is based indicating that the appellants were not to be bound thereby unless it was signed by all the parties whose names are mentioned in the body of the instrument. The fact of its being in the possession of the appellees raises the legal presumption that it was delivered to them by the parties who did sign it.

It was therefore incumbent upon them by proof, either to rebut this legal presumption, or to establish the allegation made in their answer that the appellees undertook to procure the signatures of all the parties mentioned in the body of the writing. As to both of these points there is an utter failure of proof.

*486*Elliott, for appellant.*

*Barrett & Edwards, for appellees.*

It is true that the appellants in the writing are described as a committee, but it is also true that their undertaking to pay the agreed price for the monument is personal in its character. They term themselves the party of the second part and agree to pay to appellees the subscriptions as fast as collected, and in any event, to pay them in full the amount of the contract price, when the monument is completed. From the entire writing it is clear that they undertook to pay to appellees the agreed price for the monument and themselves to look to the subscribers for the means to fulfill these obligations. The court below in giving and refusing instructions conforms to this view of the law.

Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J UA N FRANCI SC O H ERNA ND EZ C A N C H O L A , a. k . a. Ju an B erm ed o -A ri as, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 12- 72104 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 417- 014 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d Jul y24, 2013 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , C L IF T O N , an dC A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Jua n F r anc i s c o H e rnande z - C anc hol a , anat i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, p e titio n s f

o rr e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ o r d e rd is m is s in g h is appealfr om an i m m i grat i on j ud ge’ s dec i si on denyi ng hi s r equestfor a c ont i nua nc e . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of 

# FI LED AU G 01 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 72104 2 d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f

ac o n tin u an c e a n dr e v ie w d e n o v o du e p r o c e s s c la im s . Sa ndoval-L un a v. Mukasey , 5 2 6 F .3 d1 2 4 3 , 1 2 4 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) ( p e rc u r ia m ) . W e d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. T he a ge nc ydi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on orvi ol a t e due pr oc e s s i n de ny i ng H e rn a n d e z - C an c h o la ’s r e q u e s t f o rac o n tin u an c e b e c au s e h e d idn o t d e m o n s tr a te g o o dc au s e . See 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 9 ; A hm ed v. H older , 5 6 9 F .3 d1 0 0 9 , 1 0 1 2 ( 9 th C i r. 20 09 ) ( fa ct ors c on si dere d i n d et erm i ni ng w hether the deni alof a c on t i nu ance co n st i tu t es an ab u se o f d i scret i o n i n cl u d e th e n atu re o f th e ev i d en ce ex cl u d edas a r e s u lt o f th e d e n ia l) ; La ta v . I

NS , 204 F . 3d 1241, 1246 ( 9th C i r . 2000) ( r e qui r i ng e rr o ran dp r e

ju d ic e to p r e v a il o n adu e p r o c e s s c la im ) . P E T I T I O N F O R R E V I E W D E N I E D .
Exhibit   31.1
                         CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT

Peter Katevatis CEO, chairman, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Mediscience Corp.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a.   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and,

     c.   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
          the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the Company's Board of Directors of the
     registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
     functions):

     a.   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and,

     b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.


                /S/ Peter Katevatis
                -------------------

                June 14, 2006
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors
Queen Sand Resources, Inc.


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-3 of Queen Sand Resources, Inc. of our report dated August 30, 1996,
except as to the sixth paragraph of Note 3, which is as of September 30, 1996,
the fourth paragraph of Note 2, which is as of November 6, 1996, the first
paragraph of Note 5, which is as of November 12, 1996, and the second paragraph
of Note 3, which is as of November 14, 1996, relating to the consolidated
balance sheet of Queen Sand Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30,
1996, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the
annual report on Form 10-KSB of Queen Sand Resources, Inc.  We also consent to
the reference to our firm under the heading "Experts" in the prospectus.


Dallas, Texas
August 11, 1998                                  KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
                                                 /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4345

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the maximum amount 

of home loan guaranty available under the home loan guaranty program 

of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2004

Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida (for herself and Mrs. DAVIS of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the 

maximum amount of home loan guaranty available under 

the home loan guaranty program of the Department 

of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN, AND ANNUAL INDEXING OF, MAX4 IMUM AMOUNT OF HOME LOAN GUARANTY 

5 FOR CONSTRUCTION AND PURCHASE OF 

6 HOMES. 

7 (a) MAXIMUM LOAN GUARANTY BASED ON 100 PER8 CENT OF THE FREDDIE MAC CONFORMING LOAN
2

•HR 4345 IH 

1 RATE.—Section 3703(a)(1) is amended by striking 

2 ‘‘$60,000’’ each place it appears in subparagraphs 

3 (A)(i)(IV) and (B) and inserting ‘‘the maximum guaranty 

4 amount (as defined in subparagraph (C))’’. 

5 (b) DEFINITION.—Such section is further amended 

6 by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

7 ‘‘(C) In this paragraph, the term ‘maximum guaranty 

8 amount’ means the dollar amount that is equal to 25 per9 cent of the Freddie Mac conforming loan limit limitation 

10 determined under section 305(a)(2) of the Federal Home 

11 Loan Mortgage Corporation Act (12 U.S.C. 1454(a)(2)) 

12 for a single-family residence, as adjusted for the year in13 volved.’’.

Æ