alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 417 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 451
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 417

                          [Report No. 108-241]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 20, 2003

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                             March 9, 2004

              Reported by Mr. Domenici, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To revoke a Public Land Order with respect to certain lands erroneously 
      included in the Cibola National Wildlife Refuge, California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVOCATION OF PUBLIC LAND ORDER WITH RESPECT TO LANDS 
              ERRONEOUSLY INCLUDED IN CIBOLA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, 
              CALIFORNIA.

    Public Land Order 3442, dated August 21, 1964, is revoked insofar 
as it applies to the following described lands: San Bernardino 
Meridian, T11S, R22E, sec. 6, all of lots 1, 16, and 17, and SE\1/4\ of 
SW\1/4\ in Imperial County, California, aggregating approximately 
140.32 acres.

SEC. 2. RESURVEY AND NOTICE OF MODIFIED BOUNDARIES.

    The Secretary of the Interior shall, by not later than 6 months 
after the date of the enactment of this Act--
            (1) resurvey the boundaries of the Cibola National Wildlife 
        Refuge, as modified by the revocation under section 1;
            (2) publish notice of, and post conspicuous signs marking, 
        the boundaries of the refuge determined in such resurvey; and
            (3) prepare and publish a map showing the boundaries of the 
        refuge.

                                                       Calendar No. 451

108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 417

                          [Report No. 108-241]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To revoke a Public Land Order with respect to certain lands erroneously 
      included in the Cibola National Wildlife Refuge, California.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 9, 2004

                       Reported without amendment
```
Exhibit 10-b-6



DESCRIPTION OF PERFORMANCE GOALS
 ESTABLISHED IN
CONNECTION WITH 2006–2008 CASH PERFORMANCE PLAN UNDER
 THE 1997 LONG-TERM INCENTIVES PLAN



The Compensation and Management
Development Committee of the Board of Directors of ArvinMeritor, Inc., established a cash performance plan for the three-year performance period ending
September 30, 2008, under Section 7C of the 1997 Long-Term Incentives Plan, as amended. Target cash awards were established for each grantee based on
his salary grade. Payouts under the performance plan, which can range from 0% to 300% of each individual’s target award, are dependent on
ArvinMeritor’s total shareholder return (defined as cumulative stock price appreciation plus dividends) compared to that of other automotive
suppliers over the performance period. Payouts are also adjusted by applying a stock price multiplier, which can range from 50% to 200%, that measures
the change in ArvinMeritor’s stock price over the three-year period.
EXHIBIT
10.41



WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION OF DIRECTORS FEESPURSUANT TO ITEM 601(b)(10)(iii)(A) OF
REGULATION S-K

Each non-employee member
of the Board of Directors of Mentor Corporation receives a quarterly fee of
$12,500, equaling a total annual fee of $50,000.  Effective June 1, 2005,
the Chairman of the Board, who is a non-employee Director, receives a quarterly
fee of $37,500, for a total annual fee of $150,000.  The Chairperson of the
audit committee receives an additional $5,000 per year; bringing the total
annual fee for the Chairperson to $55,000.  In addition, under the
Company's amended 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan, each non-employee member of the
Board of Directors is eligible to receive options to purchase shares of the
Company's common stock.
#### W. M. Davis *v.*Davis, Trabue & Co.

Homestead — Land Subject to.

The homestead exemption law applies to land upon which the debtor lives and owns at the time of rendition of judgment, if he is a bona fide householder with a family.

Homestead — Sale by Husband and Wife.

A husband and wife may sell and convey the homestead, since it being exempt the husband’s creditors can not be injured by such action.

*488APPEAL FROM ADAIR CIRCUIT COURT.

February 20, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor: ■

The provisions, of the act to exempt homesteads from sale for debt are intended for the benefit of the debtor and his family and can only be sold to foreclose a mortgage or for the purchase money due therefor.

.Nor can it be mortgaged, released, or the exemption waived unless it be in writing, signed by the defendant and his wife and recorded. It is also provided that before a sale can be made of same under execution, attachment or judgment of a court, the officer or the court shall cause so much of the land as is of the value of one thousand dollars tO' be set apart, etc.

This exemption applies to land upon which the debtor lives and owns at the time of the judgment, if he is. a bona fide housekeeper with a family, unless he has voluntarily abandoned it and lives elsewhere. Any sale of this homestead exemption except as provided by the act is void and passes no title to the purchaser. It was therefore proper for the court, upon proof made, although judgment had been rendered to deduct so much of the land as Davis lived upon and owned as was of the value of one thousand dollars and levied on by the attachment, to' be set apart to him. The evidence shows that he owned one-half of the land in controversy; that he lived upon it and was a housekeeper with a family. His sale of it after the judgment does not make it liable for appellee’s debt. He had the right to sell it in conjunction with his wife, and the creditors were not thereby injured, as. it was not subject to the payment of their debts.

The appellee in his brief insists upon reversing the judgment against John Davis, when he was neither a party to the original or cross-appeal, and it is doubtful whether he can prosecute a cross-appeal, as John Davis has no appeal in' this court.

The judgment must be reversed as to William Davis with leave to the parties to amend their pleadings. The purchaser, Rose, should be made a defendant in order that the rights of all the parties may be finally determined, as it would be improper to assign any part of this land as a homestead to the appellant if he has sold to Rose. .The evidence is only in parol as to the sale and not alto*489gether satisfactory. The parties may introduce additional testimony upon the question as to whether there was in fact a sale, or the appellant voluntarily abandoned the premises with the intention of living somewhere else.

*Winfrey & Winfrey, for appellant.*

*H. G. Garnett, for appellee.*
2005 Senior Executive Bonus Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 WILLIAM LYON HOMES 
 2005 SENIOR EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN 
  

											
	 BONUS
PLAN
PARTICIPANT
  
	 	 %
DEFERRED
  
	 	 DEFERRAL
CRITERIA
  
	 	 PAYMENT
CRITERIA
  
	 	 DESCRIPTION
  
	 	 PAY
DATE
  

	CEO AND COO	 	 25%
	 	75% paid Year 1 25% paid Year 2 forfeited if terminated – except retirement, disability or death	 	3% of WLS pre-tax, pre-bonus income each	 	 Based on:
 •   Management Level
 •   Position Impact w/ WLS
 •   Competitive Pay Levels
 •   Short-Term Compensation Target for the Position
 •   Current Salary
 •   Individual Performance
	 	After year-end Audit
	DIVISION
PRESIDENTS	 	 25%
	 	75% paid Year 1 25% paid Year 2 forfeited if terminated – except retirement, disability or death	 	 3% of Division’s pre-tax, pre-bonus Income after Corporate
allocation
  
 minimum payment equal to 100% of annual salary
	 	 Based on:
 •   Management Level
 •   Position Impact w/ WLS
 •   Competitive Pay Levels
 •   Short-Term Compensation Target for the Position
 •   Current Salary
 •   Individual Performance
	 	After year-end Audit

  
 Note: 
  

	•	 	Plan requires the employee to be actively employed on the date bonus checks are distributed to qualify for payment except in event of death, disability or retirement.


  

	•	 	WLS represents William Lyon Homes stock symbol. 

  

	•	 	Awards to be administered (including no discretion to increase) in order to comply with Section 162(m), if applicable.
Mary Winters and Mila /s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San A ntonio, Texas

December 29, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00342

- CV

VILLA DIJON CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. and Implicity Management Company, Appellants

v.

Mary WINTERS and Mila Cheatom,

Appellees

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015

- CI

- 03926 Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On December 18 , 2015, we referred this cause to mediation

, set deadline s for mediation and a mediator’s written report, and suspended all other appellate deadlines until February 1,

2016

. On December 23, 2015

, Appellees filed an unopposed motion to extend time to file Appellees’ brief until February 19, 2016.

The appellate timetable was suspended; Appellees’ motion is MOOT. After the mediator submits a written report as ordered, this court will issu e an order addressing the appellate
timetable.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 29th day of December, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle
Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of First ConsultingGroup, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to hisknowledge, that:

 

(i)             theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedJune 25, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)          theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: August 4, 2004 | /s/ LUTHER J. NUSSBAUM                            |
|----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                       | Luther J. Nussbaum                                |
|                       | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany theReport pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No.33-8238.  This certification shall notbe deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be incorporated by reference in anyfiling of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whethermade before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporationlanguage in such filing.

 

----
Exhibit 10.17.2


SECOND AMENDMENT

TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Second Amendment modifies the Employment
Agreement between Metaldyne Corporation (“Company”)
and Jeffrey Stafeil (“Executive”)
entered into with an Effective Date of July 16, 2003, as modified by the
Amendment, the provisions of which were effective September 10, 2004. The
Employment Agreement remains in effect in accordance with its terms, except as
modified by the Amendment and this Second Amendment. In accordance with Section 12
of the Employment Agreement, the parties have agreed to amend the Employment
Agreement as follows:


In Section 2 of the Employment Agreement, the
date “December 31, 2005” is hereby deleted and replaced with the date “December 31,
2006.”


Intending
to be legally bound hereby, the parties have signed this Second Amendment to be
effective September 27, 2005.


	
  

  	
  Executive

  
	
   

  	
  October 3,
  2005

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  JEFFREY
  M. STAFEIL

  
	
  Date

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  METALDYNE CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
  November 1,
  2005

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  TIMOTHY
  D. LEULIETTE

  
	
  Date

  	
  Its:

  	
  Chairman, President and Chief
  Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,879,221
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   98,436
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (12,020)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,956,430
<PP&E>                                         167,501
<DEPRECIATION>                                (56,487)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,473,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,447,613
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           302
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,677,909)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,473,606
<SALES>                                      2,776,157
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,780,461
<CGS>                                        2,343,358
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,343,358
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               723,710
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,737
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (286,607)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (286,607)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (286,607)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)
        

</TABLE>
#### J. C. Small, Adm'r, *v.*J. C. Calhoun, etc.

Bills and Notes — Amount of Recovery.

In an action on a note, the amount of recovery, after deducting certain set-offs and credits, stated.

APPEAL FROM McCRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT.

March 10, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

By the writing sued on the obligors therein' promised twelve months after date to pay the intestate, B..Sm'all, guardian for Mary C. Smedley, seventeen hundred and sixty-six and 38-100 dollars, with interest from date, and agreed if the debt was not paid promptly when due the interest should be paid annually, or bear interest from the time it was payable. The interest, therefore, by the terms of the writing, if not paid at the end of each year, became ás principal and bore interest.

From the evidence it appears that intestate petitioned the board of councilmen to improve the street and sidewalks fronting his property, and a man of his name, who we may assume was the man who presided as chairman of the meeting when the petition was presented, ordered the petition to be received and referred; and aft-erwards, when ,the improvements had been completed, the esti*554mates made, and the owners of lots fronting the improvements ordered to pay the costs, and the claim therefor on the intestate had been assigned to Calhoun and payment demanded, he promised to settle, recognized it as a just subsisting debt, and in effect promised payment. We, therefore, conclude that for $466.75, as of date September 1st, 1858, appellees were entitled to credit on the debt.

*L:D. Husband, for appellant. '*

*Biggor, for appellees.*

Appellees are also entitled to a credit for the amount of taxes as claimed upon the list filed with the answer, less $168.86, for which appellant exhibited a receipt dated June 8, 1868.

After taking the amount for which'the note was executed, calculating the interest and making it principal at the end of each year, and then taking off all proper credit, there appears to be due to appellant the sum of ninety-two dollars with interest from the 1st of September, 1868, until paid.

Wherefore, the judgment is *reversed*and the cause is remanded with directions to render judgment in favor of appellant against appellees for the sum. of ninety-two dollars with interest at the rate of six per cent, per annum from the 1st of September, 1868, till paid and his costs.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-133898, 333-121705, 333-119808, and
333-112932 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 14, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Maui
Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. and subsidiaries and the effectiveness of Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. and subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting
(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to changes in accounting for uncertainties in income taxes, pension and postretirement benefits, and
share-based payments), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Honolulu,
Hawaii
March 14, 2008

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                             SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DIMENSIONAL VISIONS INCORPORATED (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Preston
J. Shea, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Preston J. Shea
-------------------
Preston J. Shea
President and Chief Accounting Officer



June 4, 2004
#### Darvin Rogers *v.*Martha A. Isaacs.

Dower — Alienation of.

A married woman may alienate her potential right of dower, but can only do so by record.

APPEAL FROM 'LYON CIRCUIT COURT.

February 25, 1873.

*B'ush & B'ush, T. J. Watkins, for appellant.*

*Husbands, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

The law confers the power on married women to alienate their potential right to dower in the real estate of their husbands. And they may also alienate their right to the benefit of the homestead law, or they may alienate both; but in doing so the forms of law prescribed must be observed. They can only do it by the record.'

From the mortgage filed in this case Mrs. Isaacs only parted with a right to a homestead as expressed. That is the extent of her agreement, and her dower in the land left by her husband can only be taken from' her by another contract which courts certainly have no power to make for her.

■Judgment *affirmed.*
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 23, 2022

NO. 03

- 22

- 00232

- CV

Phillip G. Scott , Appellant

v.

Sergeant Haines , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, SAN A NTONIO DIVISION BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER AND TRIANA DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the order entered by the trial court

. H aving reviewed the record

, it

appears that the C ourt lacks jurisdiction over the appeal

. Therefore, the C ourt dismisses the

appeal for want of jurisdiction

. The appellant shall pay all costs rel ating to this appeal, both i n

th is Court and in the court below.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This amended schedule contains summary financial information from the nine
months ended May 31, 1997 financial statements and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to the 10-Q filing for the nine months ended May 31, 1997. EPS
amounts are in accordance with SFAS 128.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                       4,254,449
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,333,547
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,289,606
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,120,431
<PP&E>                                       3,769,988
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,180,832
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,849,270
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,356,771
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        67,931
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,200,613
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,849,270
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            81,180,216
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               67,698,377
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,838,713
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             322,978
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,744,743
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,315,924
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,353,728
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,353,728
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .83
        

</TABLE>