70160 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 25, 2014 / Notices 

Mandatory dairy product information 

reporting is based on the Agricultural 

Marketing Act of 1946, as amended by 

the Dairy Market Enhancement Act of 

2000 and the Farm Security and Rural 

Development Act of 2002 (U.S.C. 1637– 

1637b). This program requires each 

manufacturer to report to USDA the 

price, quantity, and moisture content of 

dairy products sold and each entity 

storing dairy products to report 

information on the quantity of dairy 

products stored. Any manufacturer that 

processes, markets, or stores less than 

1,000,000 pounds of dairy products per 

year is exempt. USDA is required to 

maintain information, statistics, or 

documents obtained under these Acts in 

a manner that ensures that 

confidentiality is preserved regarding 

the identity of persons and proprietary 

business information, subject to 

verification by the Agricultural 

Marketing Service (AMS) under Public 

Law 106–532. This Notice is submitted 

in accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104– 

13 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.) and Office 

of Management and Budget regulations 

at 5 CFR part 1320. NASS also complies 

with OMB Implementation Guidance, 

‘‘Implementation Guidance for Title V 

of the E-Government Act, Confidential 

Information Protection and Statistical 

Efficiency Act of 2002 (CIPSEA),’’ 

Federal Register, Vol. 72, No. 115, June 

15, 2007, p. 33362. 

Estimate of Burden: Public reporting 

burden for this collection of information 

is estimated to average 11 minutes per 

response. This average is based on the 

7 different surveys in the information 

collection: 2 monthly, 4 quarterly, and 

1 annual. The estimated total number of 

responses is 63,100 annually, with an 

average annual frequency of 4.44 

responses per respondent. NASS also 

plans to increase the use of cover letters 

to explain the importance and uses of 

this data series along with how the 

respondent can access and report their 

data using the secure internet 

connection that NASS will be using. 

Respondents: Farms and businesses. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

14,200. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden on 

Respondents: 11,100 hours. 

Comments: Comments are invited on: 

(a) Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate 

of the burden of the proposed collection 

of information including the validity of 

the methodology and assumptions used; 

(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, 

and clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on those who are to respond, through 

the use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, technological or 

other forms of information technology 

collection methods. All responses to 

this notice will become a matter of 

public record and be summarized in the 

request for OMB approval. 

Signed at Washington, DC, November 14, 

2014. 

R. Renee Picanso, 

Associate Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2014–27896 Filed 11–24–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–20–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Economic Development Administration 

Notice of Petitions by Firms for 

Determination of Eligibility To Apply 

for Trade Adjustment Assistance 

AGENCY: Economic Development 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice and Opportunity for 

Public Comment. 

Pursuant to Section 251 of the Trade 

Act 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2341 

et seq.), the Economic Development 

Administration (EDA) has received 

petitions for certification of eligibility to 

apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance 

from the firms listed below. 

Accordingly, EDA has initiated 

investigations to determine whether 

increased imports into the United States 

of articles like or directly competitive 

with those produced by each of these 

firms contributed importantly to the 

total or partial separation of the firm’s 

workers, or threat thereof, and to a 

decrease in sales or production of each 

petitioning firm. 

LIST OF PETITIONS RECEIVED BY EDA FOR CERTIFICATION ELIGIBILITY TO APPLY FOR TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE

[11/14/2014 through 11/18/2014] 

Firm name Firm address Date accepted 

for investigation Product(s) 

Genesis Acquisition Company, Inc., d/b/a Northland 

Furniture Company.

681 SE Glenwood Drive, 

Suite 5, Bend, OR 97702.

11/18/2014 The firm manufactures wood products, molding, panels, veneer or laminated panels. 

Main Street Pedicabs, Inc ...... 11811 Upham Street, #9, 

Broomfield, CO 80020.

11/14/2014 The firm manufactures human powered transportation 

pedicabs, made of steel frames, fiberglass bodies, and bicycle components. 

Perennial Energy, LLC ........... 1375 County Road 8690, 

West Plains, MO 65775.

11/18/2014 The firm manufactures customized biogas handling systems 

(Skids, Flares)—extract/remove waste gases from landfills, digesters & other sources. 

Vforge, Inc .............................. 5567 West 6th Avenue, Lakewood, CO 80214.11/14/2014 The firm manufactures high precision aluminum alloy forged 

components for various industries. 

Thurston Manufacturing, Inc .. 1708 H Avenue, Thurston, NE 

68062.

11/18/2014 The firm manufactures agricultural equipment. 

American Standard Company, 

Inc.

1570 Water Street, Southington, CT 06489.11/12/2014 The firm manufactures fiber optic wire strippers, dog tags, 

blades for knives, tree pruning tools, various metal 

stamped products and various tools assemblies. 

Any party having a substantial 

interest in these proceedings may 

request a public hearing on the matter. 

A written request for a hearing must be 

submitted to the Trade Adjustment 

Assistance for Firms Division, Room 

71030, Economic Development 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no 

later than ten (10) calendar days 

following publication of this notice. 

Please follow the requirements set 

forth in EDA’s regulations at 13 CFR 

315.9 for procedures to request a public 


wreier-aviles on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 25, 2014 / Notices 70161 

1The Regulations are currently codified in the 

Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730– 

774 (2014). The Regulations issued pursuant to the 

Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401– 

2420 (2000)) (‘‘EAA’’). Since August 21, 2001, the 

EAA has been in lapse and the President, through 

Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 

2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended 

by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent 

being that of August 7, 2014 (79 FR 46959 (August 

11, 2014)), has continued the Regulations in effect 

under the International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq. (2006 & Supp. 

IV 2010)). 

hearing. The Catalog of Federal 

Domestic Assistance official number 

and title for the program under which 

these petitions are submitted is 11.313, 

Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms. 

Dated: November 18, 2014. 

Michael DeVillo, 

Eligibility Examiner. 

[FR Doc. 2014–27877 Filed 11–24–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–WH–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

In the Matter of: Diocenyr Ribamar 

Barbosa-Santos, 3928 Shiver Road, 

Fort Worth, TX 76244–8692; Order 

Denying Export Privileges 

On October 3, 2013, in the U.S. 

District Court for the Southern District 

of Florida, Diocenyr Ribamar BarbosaSantos (‘‘Barbosa-Santos’’) was 

convicted of violating the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 

U.S.C. 1701, et seq. (2006 & Supp. IV 

2010)) (‘‘IEEPA’’). Specifically, BarbosaSantos knowingly and willfully engaged 

in a transaction involving the attempted 

export, sale, brokering and financing of 

an A–300 Airbus aircraft from China to 

Iran, in violation, inter alia, of IEEPA. 

Barbosa-Santos was sentenced to 24 

months in prison, three years of 

supervised release, and a $100 

assessment. 

Section 766.25 of the Export 

Administration Regulations (‘‘EAR’’ or 

‘‘Regulations’’) 1 provides, in pertinent 

part, that ‘‘[t]he Director of the Office of 

Exporter Services, in consultation with 

the Director of the Office of Export 

Enforcement, may deny the export 

privileges of any person who has been 

convicted of a violation of the Export 

Administration Act (‘‘EAA’’), the EAR, 

or any order, license or authorization 

issued thereunder; any regulation, 

license, or order issued under the 

International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706); 18 

U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of 

the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50 

U.S.C. 783(b)), or section 38 of the Arms 

Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).’’ 15 

CFR 766.25(a); see also Section 11(h) of 

the EAA, 50 U.S.C. app. § 2410(h). The 

denial of export privileges under this 

provision may be for a period of up to 

10 years from the date of the conviction. 

15 CFR 766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C. 

app. § 2410(h). In addition, Section 

750.8 of the Regulations states that the 

Bureau of Industry and Security’s Office 

of Exporter Services may revoke any 

Bureau of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’) 

licenses previously issued in which the 

person had an interest in at the time of 

his conviction. 

BIS has received notice of BarbosaSantos’s conviction for violating the 

IEEPA, and in accordance with Section 

766.25 of the Regulations, BIS has 

provided notice and an opportunity for 

Barbosa-Santos to make a written 

submission to BIS. BIS has not received 

a submission from Barbosa-Santos. 

Based upon my review and 

consultations with BIS’s Office of 

Export Enforcement, including its 

Director, and the facts available to BIS, 

I have decided to deny Barbosa-Santos’s 

export privileges under the Regulations 

for a period of five (5) years from the 

date of Barbosa-Santos’s conviction. I 

have also decided to revoke all licenses 

issued pursuant to the Act or 

Regulations in which Barbosa-Santos 

had an interest at the time of his 

conviction. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered: 

First, from the date of this Order until 

October 3, 2018, Diocenyr Ribamar 

Barbosa-Santos, with a last known 

address of 3928 Shiver Road, Fort 

Worth, TX 76244–8692, and when 

acting for or on his behalf, his 

successors, assigns, employees, agents 

or representatives (the ‘‘Denied 

Person’’), may not, directly or indirectly, 

participate in any way in any 

transaction involving any commodity, 

software or technology (hereinafter 

collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’) 

exported or to be exported from the 

United States that is subject to the 

Regulations, including, but not limited 

to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license, License Exception, or 

export control document; 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States that is 

subject to the Regulations, or in any 

other activity subject to the Regulations; 

or 

C. Benefitting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

that is subject to the Regulations, or in 

any other activity subject to the 

Regulations. 

Second, no person may, directly or 

indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export or reexport to or on behalf 

of the Denied Person any item subject to 

the Regulations; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

the Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession, or control of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States, including financing or other 

support activities related to a 

transaction whereby the Denied Person 

acquires or attempts to acquire such 

ownership, possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from the Denied Person of 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been exported from the United 

States; 

D. Obtain from the Denied Person in 

the United States any item subject to the 

Regulations with knowledge or reason 

to know that the item will be, or is 

intended to be, exported from the 

United States; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by the Denied 

Person, or service any item, of whatever 

origin, that is owned, possessed or 

controlled by the Denied Person if such 

service involves the use of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States. For purposes of this paragraph, 

servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification or 

testing. 

Third, after notice and opportunity for 

comment as provided in Section 766.23 

of the Regulations, any other person, 

firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to Barbosa-Santos 

by ownership, control, position of 

responsibility, affiliation, or other 

connection in the conduct of trade or 

business may also be made subject to 

the provisions of this Order in order to 

prevent evasion of this Order. 

Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of 

the Regulations, Barbosa-Santos may file 

an appeal of this Order with the Under 

Secretary of Commerce for Industry and 

Security. The appeal must be filed 

within 45 days from the date of this 

Order and must comply with the 

provisions of Part 756 of the 

Regulations. 

Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be 

delivered to the Barbosa-Santos. This 


wreier-aviles on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES