alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 12.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002**

 

I, Andrew Sukawaty, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 20-F of Inmarsat Group Limited (the “Company”); 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.    The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: 

 

(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

 

(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.    The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)    All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)    Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Exhibit 32.2

 

Mechanical Technology Incorporated

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Mechanical Technology Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Cynthia A. Scheuer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), that, to my knowledge:
#### STATE v. STURDIVANT

No. 311P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 439

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 23 July 1997. Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 23 July 1997.
### NUMBER 13

- 10

- 00 696

- CV



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

ESTATE OF AGNES W. MEELER, DECEASED

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

of Victoria County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

This appeal was abated by this Court on April 28, 2011 , to allow the parties the

opportunity to engage in settlement negotiations. This cause is now before the Court on

appellant = s motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties have reached a

settlement agreement. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

Accordingly, this case is hereby REINSTATED.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant = s motion to

dismiss the appeal without prejudice , is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.2

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a). Appellant = s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is

hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d)

("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant = s request, no motion for rehearing will be

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURI AM

D elivered and filed the 31st day of August , 20 1 1

.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATE OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Koger
Equity, Inc. (the Company) that he has reviewed this quarterly report and, to
the best of his knowledge and belief, the quarterly report of the Company on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that the
quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the report not
misleading, and that the information contained in such report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of
such period and the results of operations and cash flows of the Company for
such period. Dated: May 4, 2004
    /s/ Thomas J. CrockerThomas J. CrockerChief
Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Koger Equity, Inc. Dated: May 4, 2004
    /s/ Steven A. AbneySteven A. AbneyVice President,
Finance and
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Koger Equity, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information from the six months ended
February 28, 1998 financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the 10-Q filing for the six months ended February 28, 1998. EPS
amounts are in accordance with SFAS 128.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                       2,567,038
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,505,543
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,683,632
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,878,595
<PP&E>                                       4,583,178
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,584,248
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              63,046,272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,941,409
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,820
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,281,439
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                63,046,272
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            58,722,883
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               49,831,586
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               280,903
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             230,753
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,592,836
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,478,995
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,079,881
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,079,881
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 521 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 10, 1998.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2863) to amend the Migratory Bird Treaty Act to clarify restrictions 
under that Act on baiting, to facilitate acquisition of migratory bird habitat, 
and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. 
General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Resources. After general debate the bill shall be considered 
for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an 
original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the 
amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 
Resources now printed in the bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a 
substitute shall be considered as read. During consideration of the bill for 
amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in 
recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused 
it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that 
purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as 
read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time 
during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a 
recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time 
for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic 
vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum time for electronic 
voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the 
conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise 
and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. 
Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in 
the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the 
nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion 
except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Norton, etc., *v.*L. Anderson.

Costs — Accruing Under Cross-Action — Liability For.

One who undertakes to pay the defendant all the costs that may accrue to him at the suit of plaintiffs is not liable for the costs incurred by a cross-action against plaintiff.

*332APPEAL FROM GRAVES' CIRCUIT COURT.

January 16, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

Luden Anderson covenanted by the bond executed January *7,*1867, that the president and directors of the Bank of Tennessee should pay to Clanton & McFadden, the defendants to- the action, and to the officers of the court all costs that might accrue to them in that action, either in the Graves Circuit Court or any other court to which it might be carried.

That action was never carried to any other court, and the Bank of Tennessee recovered judgment in the Graves Circuit Court. The appeal that was brought to this court was from the judgments in favor of Norton, Hall & Morse on cross-actions brought by them against the bank. Anderson did not undertake to secure the payment of the costs incurred in these suits either in the Graves Circuit Court or in this court. Hence the rule against him must be discharged, at the costs of Norton, Hall & Morse.

-, *for appellant.*

-, *for appellee.*
Exhibit 24

                            POWER OF ATTORNEY


     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints David L. Nichols, James M. McVicker and
William A. Carr, and each of them, his true and lawful Attorney-in-Fact and
Agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in
his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities (including his capacity
as director of Mercantile Stores Company, Inc.) to sign Form 10K of Mercantile
Stores Company, Inc. for the year ended January 31, 1998, and to file the
same together with all Exhibits thereto and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting to the
Attorneys-in-Fact and Agents and each of them full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done
in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that the
Attorneys-in-Fact and Agents or any of them or their or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.


Dated:         April 16, 1998


     H. Keith H. Brodie, M.D.                     Roger Milliken


     John A. Herdeg                               Thomas J. Malone


     Lawrence R. Pugh                             Gerrish H. Milliken


     Francis G. Rodgers                           Minot K. Milliken


     Roger K. Smith
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 27, 2019

p1120

Order 

Clerk

November 27, 2019

159512

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 159512

COA: 343806

Eaton CC: 2016-020238-FH

MICHAEL CLIFFORD BYERS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 14, 2019 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 4.32
 Third Amended and Restated Equity Interests Pledge Agreement
  Pledgee:  Address:  Legal Representative:
 Pledgor:  ID No.:  Address: th
 WHEREAS,
 www.elong.com
      th
 th




---



##### 



Definitions And Interpretation
        Assignments And Pledge
  Rate Of Pledge And Term Of Pledge
 The rate of Pledge
  The term of Pledge
   Physical Possession Of Documents




---



##### 



Representation of the Pledgor
   Warranties and Guarantee of the Pledgor
         Event Of Default




---



##### 



Exercise Of The Right Of The Pledge




---



##### 



Transfers Or Assignment
     Termination
   Formalities Fees And Other Charges
   Force Majeure
 Force majeure force majeure




---



##### 



force majeure force majeure force majeure force majeure
 Dispute Resolution
        Notice




---



##### 



Appendices
  Effectiveness
    The
Pledgee:
 Signature of Authorized Representative:
    
    /s/ Justin Tang
 Official Seal:
 The
Pledgor:
 Signature:
    
    /s/ Jack Wang
 Appendices
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL IMFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS, CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY
31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                         144,986
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  589,591
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,078
<INVENTORY>                                    505,021
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,275,189
<PP&E>                                       1,232,550
<DEPRECIATION>                                 446,166
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,177,791
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          251,879
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,410
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,641,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,177,791
<SALES>                                      3,054,924
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,143,765
<CGS>                                        2,207,618
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,207,618
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,685
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                213,362
<INCOME-TAX>                                    83,656
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            129,706
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   129,706
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.53
        

</TABLE>
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel, are you 

a 

 Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this Court’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 U.S.C.§1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on 

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 18-2 Filed: 08/31/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:244
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit No. 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-06291 and 333-20416 on Form S-8 for the Quaker State Corporation Thrift and
Stock Purchase Plan, filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and in
the Prospectus used in connection with such Registration Statement, of our
report dated June 19, 1998, on our audits of the financial statements of the
Quaker State Corporation Thrift and Stock Purchase Plan as of December 31, 1997
and 1996 and for the years then ended, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 11-K.

We also consent to the reference to our Firm under the caption "Experts."



/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.



Dallas, Texas
June 23, 1998
Exhibit 21

Maui
Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.Subsidiaries
As of December 31, 2010

Name

State of
Incorporation

Percentage
of OwnershipMaui Pineapple Company, Ltd.

Hawaii

100Kapalua Land Company, Ltd.

Hawaii

100Kapalua Realty Company, Ltd.

Hawaii

100Kapalua Advertising Company, Ltd.

Hawaii

100Kapalua Water Company, Ltd.

Hawaii

100Kapalua Waste Treatment Company, Ltd.

Hawaii

100Kapalua Bay Holdings, LLC

Delaware

51Kapalua Bay, LLC

Delaware

100


1

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 1 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 522-1 Filed: 04/27/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:13731
Unified Social Credit Identifier: 

91440300MA5G0X4H53 Business License

(Duplicate) 

QR Code 

Name: Shenzhen Jiangyou Import and Export Co., Ltd. 

Type of Enterprise: Limited Liability Company 

(solely owned by an individual) 

Legal Representative: Wang Yiqiang

Date of Establishment: December 25, 2019 

Address: 1201—04, No. 2000 Yousuowei Building, Jiaxian 

Road, Gangtou Community, Bantian Street, 

Longgang District, Shenzhen

I 

M 

P 

O 

R 

T 

A 

N 

T 

 N 

O 

T 

I 

C 

E

1. The business scope of the commercial entity shall be determined by the 

articles of association. The business scope shall be subject to the approval of laws 

and regulations, and the relevant business operations may be commenced after 

obtaining the approval of the license.

2. For matters related to the business scope and licensing projects of the 

commercial entity, as well as annual report information and other credit 

information, please log in to the National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity 

System or Scan the QR code of at the right corner of the license. 

3. The commercial entity shall submit the annual report of the previous year to 

the commercial registration authority within two months from the commercial 

entity anniversary date. The commercial entity shall publicize the information of 

the commercial subject to the public in accordance with the Article 10 of the 

Interim Regulation on Enterprise Information Disclosure.

Issued by: Shenzhen Municipal 

Administration for Market Regulation 

(Stamp) 

October 21, 2020

Website of National Enterprise Information 

Publicity System: http://www.gsxt.gov.cn 

Made under Supervision of the 

State Administration for Market Regulation

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 522-1 Filed: 04/27/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:13732
Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 522-1 Filed: 04/27/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:13733