alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">National Medical &amp; Surgical Supply, Inc., as Assignee of Guarionex Volcy, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>ELRAC, Inc., Doing Business as Enterprise Rent-A-Car, Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Steven Z. Mostofsky, J.), entered July 14, 2014. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>The affidavits submitted by defendant established that the examination under oath (EUO) scheduling letters and the denial of claim form had been timely mailed (<a href="../2008/2008_04072.htm" target="_blank"><i>see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co.</i>, 50 AD3d 1123</a> [2008]). Defendant also submitted affidavits from the receptionists at defense counsel's law firm, which affidavits were sufficient to establish that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear at either of the duly scheduled EUOs (<a href="../2006/2006_09604.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.</i>, 35 AD3d 720</a> [2006]).</p><p>Contrary to plaintiff's assertion, there is no basis for a distinction between defendant's contractual remedies when "the failure to appear for [EUOs] occurs before the submission of the claim form or after its submission" (<i>id.</i> at 722). The appearance of a provider's assignor at a duly requested EUO is a condition precedent to an insurer's liability on a policy (<i>see</i> 11 NYCRR 65-1.1; <i>Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C.</i>, 35 AD3d at 722), and plaintiff does not claim to have responded in any way to the EUO requests. Therefore, plaintiff's objections regarding the EUO requests will not now be heard (<a href="../2012/2012_50579.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Viviane Etienne Med. Care, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.</i>, 35 Misc 3d 127</a>[A], 2012 NY Slip Op 50579[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2012]; <a href="../2011/2011_50622.htm" target="_blank"><i>Crescent Radiology, PLLC v American Tr. Ins. Co.</i>, 31 Misc 3d 134</a>[A], 2011 NY Slip Op 50622[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th &amp; 10th Jud Dists 2011]).</p><p>Accordingly, the order is affirmed.</p><p>Pesce, P.J., Solomon and Elliot, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: January 05, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 229 (Friday, November 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 70914]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28044]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 378]

Delegation of the Authority To Make Determinations Under 22 
U.S.C. 2656f(d) From the Secretary of State to the Under Secretary for 
Management

    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of State by the 
State Department Basic Authorities Act (22 U.S.C. 2651a) and Section 
140 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, 1988 and 1989 (Pub. L. 
100-204), as amended (22 U.S.C. 2656f), I hereby delegate to the Under 
Secretary of State for Management, to the extent consistent with law, 
the authority to determine whether an individual's death resulted from 
terrorism or an act of terrorism, for the purpose of approving the 
payment of certain death benefits under Sections 413, 415, and 416 of 
the Foreign Service Act of 1980, as amended (22 U.S.C 3973, 3975, 
3976).
    In exercising the authority delegated herein, the Under Secretary 
will consult with relevant Department of State offices and bureaus 
before making the determination that a death resulted from terrorism or 
an act of terrorism.
    Notwithstanding this Delegation of Authority, the Secretary, the 
Deputy Secretary, or the Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources 
may at any time exercise any function delegated by this delegation of 
authority.
    Any act, executive order, regulation or procedure affected by this 
delegation shall be deemed to be such act, executive order, regulation, 
or procedure as amended from time to time. The delegation of authority 
does not revoke, supersede, or otherwise affect any other delegation of 
authority to the Under Secretary for Management.
    This delegation of authority shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

John F. Kerry
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-28044 Filed 11-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-15-P
```
Case: 1:20-cv-04746 Document #: 9-3 Filed: 08/13/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:102
Case: 1:20-cv-04746 Document #: 9-3 Filed: 08/13/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:103
Case: 1:20-cv-04746 Document #: 9-3 Filed: 08/13/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:104
----

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, 

| (1) | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |                                  |                      |
|------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|---------------------------|
|                               | STUDIO ONE MEDIA, INC.                |
|                               |                                  |                      |
| Date:  November 15, 2010 | By:                         | /s/  Preston J. Shea |
|                               | Preston J. Shea                       |
|                               | President and Chief Executive Officer |

|                               |                                                 |                          |
|------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                               | STUDIO ONE MEDIA, INC.                               |
|                               |                                                 |                          |
| Date:  November 15, 2010 | By:                                        | /s/  Kenneth R. Pinckard |
|                               | Kenneth R. Pinckard                                  |
|                               | Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         479,903
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  499,492
<ALLOWANCES>                                   215,725
<INVENTORY>                                     13,735
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,104,054
<PP&E>                                         141,595
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,050,563
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          285,277
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           11,380
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,512
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,253,108
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,050,563
<SALES>                                        383,485
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               423,471
<CGS>                                          119,225
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  159,211
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               436,879
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                134,138
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            134,138
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   134,138
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,032
<SECURITIES>                                     7,441
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,004
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,090
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,811
<PP&E>                                          46,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,561
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,566
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,286
<BONDS>                                         17,256
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,565
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,184
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    72,566
<SALES>                                         20,399
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,399
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,609
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    41
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (522)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (729)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 69459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27550]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL15-19-000]


Avista Corporation; Notice of Petition for Declaratory Order

    Take notice that on November 10, 2014, pursuant to Rule 207 of the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.207, and sections 366.3(b)(i) and 366.3(d) of 
the Commission's regulations, Avista Coproration (Avista) requesting 
exemption from certain requirements under the Public Utility Holding 
Company Act of 2005 (PUHCA 2005),\1\ as more fully described in the 
petition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 42 U.S.C. 16451, et seq. (PUHCA 2005). See 42 U.S.C. 16454 
(providing for certain exemptions from the requirements of PUHCA 
2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Petitioner.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d79192859498b9bbbeb9b284a2a7a7b8a5a397b1b2a5b4f9b0b8a1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="05434057464a6b696c6b60567075756a777145636077662b626a73">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on December 10, 2014.

    Dated: November 14, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-27550 Filed 11-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case: 1:20-cr-00585 Document #: 43-1 Filed: 05/11/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:93
Case: 1:20-cr-00585 Document #: 43-1 Filed: 05/11/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:94
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

JARRELL RAYMOND SAUNDERS,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 409 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of March, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

EMOJI COMPANY GmbH, )

) Case No.: 20-cv-4911

)

) Judge John Robert Blakey

Plaintiff, )

) 

v. )

)

THE INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, )

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, )

PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED )

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON )

SCHEDULE A HERETO, )

)

Defendants. )

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff EMOJI COMPANY 

GmbH, hereby dismisses with prejudice all causes of action in the complaint against the following 

Defendants identified in Schedule A. Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs.

No. Defendant

16 Bear Boys

27 CdVeK9ca

28 changchunshiliufengshangmaoyouxiangongsi

43 Eric Martinz

74 Camille Doyle

78 Colormu

105 Bing4Bing

111 Chunlei

138 DXTDCMMe

142 GGMart

168 Elizabeth Dunlop

170 Franklin Waters

171 Futong Huaxia

183 Butymeiyi

185 Field Rain

186 Game Life

187 G-Fulling

216 C-Join

225 Allen Vision

261 Double Joy
The respective Defendants have not filed an answer to the complaint or a motion for summary 

judgment in this matter. Therefore, it is respectfully submitted that dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is 

appropriate.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: December 11, 2020 By: s/Michael A. Hierl _ 

Michael A. Hierl (Bar No. 3128021)

William B. Kalbac (Bar No. 6301771)

Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd.

Three First National Plaza

70 W. Madison Street, Suite 4000

Chicago, Illinois 60602

(312) 580-0100 Telephone

mhierl@hsplegal.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

EMOJI COMPANY GmbH
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned attorney hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of 

Voluntary Dismissal was filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court and served on all counsel of 

record and interested parties via the CM/ECF system on December 11, 2020.

s/Michael A. Hierl
#### John R. Moore and Wife *v.*J. A. Graham.

Husband and Wife — Deed by Wife — Pleading.

A deed executed by a married woman without her husband joining is insufficient, and unless the plaintiff grantor flies an amended petition and tenders therewith a good and sufficient deed, her petition should be dismissed.

APPEAL FROM WARREN CIRCUIT COURT.

April 3, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

From the pleading in this case it appears that appellant, Mrs. Lee Ann Moore, acquired title to the house and lots from the contract for the sale of which this litigation has arisen under the first clause of the will of her father, the late Bennett Barnam, which reads as follows: “After my just debts and funeral expenses are paid, I give, bequeath, and devise to my daughter, Lee Ann Smith, widow of the late Calvin Smith, deceased, all of my real estate and slaves, of which I may die possessed, or of which I may then be the owner, whether said property be held separately or in conjunction with another.” If there had been no other clause in the will limiting her estate in the house and lot, it would have been general and by joining with her husband in a sale and conyeyance the purchaser would have taken an unincumbered title.

But by the fifth clause of the will the testator directed that the real estate devised to* the said Lee Ann Smith, in cas'e of her mar*617riage, was to be entirely fre'e from the control or disposition of her husband, and not in any way subject to his debts, whereby her estate in said property was made separate. But be that as it may, the deed which she professes to have made is wholly insufficient to invest ap-pellee with the legal title, and she should have tendered an amended petition with a good and sufficient deed in which her husband should have joined, and upon her failing to do so the petition should have been dismissed without prejudice to another suit. This, however, according to our construction of the judgment, the court below failed to do'; and if permitted to stand said judgment might operate as a bar to another action on said obligation.

*Bush, for appellants.*

*Hines, for appellee.*

Wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to dismiss the petition unless appellants should within reasonable time offer to amend the petition and present such pleadings as will ultimately put an end to the litigation.

As the first error in pleading commenced with appellants, they will not be allowed to recover costs, but must pay their even costs.
#### Washington County *v.*Harvey McElroy.

Taxation — Listing Land for Taxation.

Under the Act approved March 28, 1872, relating to improper tax levy, it is made imperative that all persons owning land in Washington county lease the same for taxation in such county for all legal purposes, and the fact that the owner has listed the land situated in such county in another county, is no excuse.

APPEAL FROM WASHINGTON' CIRCUIT COURT.

February 20, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

The power of the Legislature to authorize the taxation of the lands within the limits of the respective counties of the commonwealth for local or county purposes can not be questioned, and -we are not aware of any law which confers, jurisdiction on county courts to exempt owners of lands from the operation, of such laws.

Sec. 2, Art. 8, ch. 83, 2 Vol. R. S., p. 258, provides that if a person be improperly charged with any levy or tax, before he has paid the same he may make proof thereof to the court of the county in which the assessment was made, and the court may correct the same, etc.

The first inquiry under this enactment is, was appellee improperly charged with the tax of which, he complained? If not, the county court had no power to afford him relief.

By an act approved March 28, 1872, it is made the imperative duty of all persons owning land in Washington County, although they do not reside therein, to list the same for taxation in the county *492in which the land is situated, for all local purposes. That act took effect from' its passage, and repealed the .act of 1867 or so much of it as is in conflict with the last-named act.

*Selecman, W. H. Hays, for appellmt.*

*Kirk, for appellee.*

It can be no excuse to appellee that he had listed the 600 acres of land owned by him within the territorial limits of Washington County in Marion County, in which county he resided. The statute makes no such exception, and the county court has no authority to supply it, and thereby qualify or restrict it.

In a proceeding of this character appellee should have made the county of Washington a defendant to his motion, and notified the attorney of the county, by whom it is represented, of his intended motion a reasonable time before he made his motion, but as the county attorney appeared and approved the motion, want of reasonable notice was waived, but it was not on that account that the proceeding against the county was not *ex parte.*The county, therefore, had the right to prosecute this appeal.

Wherefore, for the reasons stated, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded, with directions, to dismiss the motion.
HMM Reference NIST Technical Note 2205: Item 30 Combustible Decks & Nearby Fuels

Wood pallet

fuel

Wood 

pile fuel

Item 30 Combustible Decks & Nearby Fuels – Remove combustibles around the house and away from the deck.

Noncombustible deck with limited fuel 

Area under deck clear of combustibles 

Extended concrete deck post footer

Note: Selected photographs are included to illustrate each HMM hardening item. Additional vulnerabilities or hardening items may be seen in the photographs, but those are highlighted within their specific HMM item.
There is no CAD drawing for 

Item 30: Combustible Decks & Nearby Fuels 

Please see photographs for illustrations.
EXHIBIT C

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 385-3 Filed: 08/24/21 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:9457
Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 385-3 Filed: 08/24/21 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:9458
Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 385-3 Filed: 08/24/21 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:9459
Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 385-3 Filed: 08/24/21 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:9460
Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 385-3 Filed: 08/24/21 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:9461
Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 385-3 Filed: 08/24/21 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:9462