IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

ABC CORPORATION I, 

ABC CORPORATION II, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND 

UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS 

IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 1:20-cv-4806 

Judge Thomas M. Durkin 

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole 

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A TEMORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND 

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 

Plaintiffs Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co. and Unicorn Global, Inc. (collectively, 

“Plaintiffs”) respectfully move this Court for entry of a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) 

and Preliminary Injunction (“PI”) restraining and enjoining the Defendants Gyroor, Gyroor-US, 

Urbanmax, Fengchi-US, HGSM, Gaodeshang-US, Jiangyou-US, and Gyroshoes (collectively, 

“Defendants”) and those in active concert with them, until trial or further order of this Court, from 

manufacturing, reproducing, marketing, selling, offering to sell, licensing, importing, and/or 

exporting hoverboard products that infringe upon Plaintiffs’ U.S. Design Patent Nos. D737,723 

and D738,256 and restraining the transfer of assets associated with sales of any such products. 

This motion is made on the grounds that, as to Plaintiffs’ patent infringement claims, Plaintiff 

is likely to succeed on the merits, Plaintiff is threatened with irreparable harm, and the balance of 

harms weighs in favor of granting the TRO and PI. Plaintiffs move as an opportunity for all 

Defendants to contest the PI on the merits. 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 592 Filed: 11/09/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:14211
2 

This motion is made pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 65, and is based 

upon this Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, 

Memorandum of Law in support thereof, the Expert Declarations of Paul Hatch and Richard F. 

Bero and their attachments, all pleadings, records, and documents on file herein, and such matters 

which this Court may take judicial notice, and upon such further oral argument and documentary 

evidence as may be presented to the Court at or before the hearing on this motion. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: November 9, 2022 

PALMERSHEIM & MATHEW LLP TARTER KRINSKY & DROGIN LLP 

By: /s/ Richard J.L. Lomuscio

Robert J. Palmersheim Richard J.L. Lomuscio 

Anand C. Mathew Mark Berkowitz 

Timothy G. Parilla 1350 Broadway 

401 N. Franklin Street, Suite 4S New York, NY 10018 

Chicago, IL 60654 Tel.: (212) 216-8000 

Tel.: (312) 319-1791 Fax: (212) 216-8001 

E-mail: acm@thepmlawfirm.com E-mail: rlomuscio@tarterkrinsky.com 

E-mail: rjp@thepmlawfirm.com E-mail: mberkowitz@tarterkrinsky.com 

E-mail: tgp@thepmlawfirm.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 592 Filed: 11/09/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:14212
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on November 9, 2022, a true and correct copy of the foregoing

document was filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF which will generate and serve a

Notice of Electronic Filing to all parties to this action.

Dated: November 9, 2022

PALMERSHEIM & MATHEW LLP

Robert J. Palmersheim

Anand C. Mathew

Timothy G. Parilla

401 N. Franklin Street, Suite 4S

Chicago, IL 60654

Tel.: (312) 319-1791

E-mail: acm@thepmlawfirm.com

E-mail: rjp@thepmlawfirm.com

E-mail: tgp@thepmlawfirm.com

TARTER KRINSKY & DROGIN LLP

By: /s/ Richard J.L. Lomuscio

Richard J.L. Lomuscio

Mark Berkowitz

1350 Broadway

New York, NY 10018

Tel.: (212) 216-8000

Fax: (212) 216-8001

E-mail: rlomuscio@tarterkrinsky.com

E-mail: mberkowitz@tarterkrinsky.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 592 Filed: 11/09/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:14213