alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

**Exhibit      32.0**

**CERTIFICATIONS      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   |                                                                                                                                    |                                   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                    | /s/              Robert W. White  |
|   | Robert                W. WhiteChairman,                President andChief                Executive OfficerMarch                15, 2007 |

|   |                                                                                                                                                |                                                 |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                | /s/              Jack              J. Sandoski  |
|   | Jack                  J. SandoskiSenior                  Vice President and Chief                  Financial OfficerMarch                  15, 2007 |

*A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Abington Community Bancorp, Inc. and      will be retained by Abington Community Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
#### Fidelity Union Casualty Company *v.*Posey.

Opinion delivered January 28, 1929.

*1018
      *John F. Park,*for appellant.

*R. W. Wilson,*for appellee.

Kirby, J.

Appellant insists that the court erred in not giving its requested peremptory instruction directing the jury to find in its favor, the policy excluding *1019recovery on account of accidents suffered by insured while driving a motor truck.

The undisputed testimony shows that appellee was injured while cranking the car or truck — was out on the ground attempting to start it by turning the crank when the injury was sustained. The policy expressly insures against accidental injuries sustained while operating, driving, riding in or on, demonstrating, adjusting or cranking an automobile. This language necessarily covers and insures against the risk attending upon cranking an automobile, unless, it is so limited by said part 4, § E, as not to do so. This exception relates only to injuries received while driving or riding in or on any motorcycle, automobile truck, tractor or aircraft, and is not in conflict with or repugnant to the insuring clause covering the risk of bodily injury sustained while cranking an automobile. Since the risk from cranking an automobile is covered expressly and since the exemption or exception is not broad enough or sufficiently specific to exempt the company from liability for injury received from cranking an automobile truck, it necessarily follows that the court did not err in refusing the request for a peremptory instruction. *English*v. Shelby, 116 Ark. 212, 172 S. W. 817.

We find no error in the other instruction complained of, and the evidence is sufficient to support the judgment, which must be affirmed It is so ordered.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kiran Patel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Solectron Corporation on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended February 27,
2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Solectron Corporation.

Date: April 9, 2004

                                            /s/ Kiran Patel
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Kiran Patel
                                            Executive Vice President and Chief
                                            Financial Officer
Oh oY AS Oo wee i 4 hah, en ——

‘cbaliatialig NEN tare Kw tern

OFFICIAL JUDICIAL, CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT,
AND GENERAL ELECTION BALLOT

NOVEMBER 3, 1998

POLK COUNTY, IOWA

ee >

| NONPARTISAN REGIONAL LIBRARY
| TRUSTEE

| MARLYS L. LENHART

‘| WRITE IN

| NONPARTISAN COUNTY PUBLIC
| HOSPITAL TRUSTEE

| DEBBIE THEISEN-CHENCHAR
| STEPHEN T. CONWAY
| JEFFREY FALK

VOTE FOR NO MORE THAN ONE

VOTE FOR NO
MORE THAN THREE

DAVID HARKNESS

| MARGARET ANN STOUT

| WRITE IN

WRITE IN

WRITE IN

= — —~—_—

VOTE BOTH»
SIDES

2 NONPARTISAN SOIL & WATER
| CONSERVATION COMMISSION

VOTE FOR NO MORE THAN TWO

: JOHN F. HALL
| PAUL M. WIEDEMEIER

) WRITE IN

} WRITE IN

NONPARTISAN COUNTY AGRICULTURAL
EXTENSION COUNCIL VOTE FOR NO

MORE THAN FIVE

PHIL NEGLEY
MARTHA A. PETRAK
SHIRLEY PLOEGSTRA
RUTH M. DEVRIES
GLORIA ANN ELMORE

SS SSaannDDna=—_—_

Shall the Following Judges Be
Retained in Office?

DISTRICT ASSOCIATE JUDGES

DOUGLAS F. STASKAL YES
NO

GREGORY D. BRANDT YES
NO

CAROL S. EGLY YES
NO

MATTHEW M. MCENIRY YES
NO

THOMAS A. RENDA YES
NO

KAREN A. ROMANO YES
NO

AMENDMENT TO THE
CONSTITUTION OF IOWA
®
Shall the Following Amendment to the
Constitution Be Adopted?

Summary: Amends the section on
rights of persons to include women.
(Full Text Explanation is Posted Inside
Voting Booth.)

YES
NO
AMENDMENT T0 THE
CONSTITUTION OF IOWA
@

Shall the Following Amendment to the
Constitution Be Adopted?



PAULAM.HUTION =—S—t—i<‘i‘“‘“‘;< MT!

mms) = Summary: Removes one hundred dollar
PAUL A. KOENIGUER fine limit for minor offenses which may
SHAR] MARCKMANN be tried without a jury. (Full Text
mmm Explanation is Posted Inside Voting
WRITE IN aia Booth.)
WRITE IN
BES
WRITE IN YES
=
WRITE IN NO
==
WRITE IN
Eas
SS
EE
Shall the Following Judges Be —_
Retained in Office?
jem =i}
SUPREME COURT
Ess]
| K. DAVID HARRIS YES
=
NO
i=
COURT OF APPEALS ,
| : |
MICHAEL J. STREIT YES
ez
| iach NO
| = =
| GAYLE VOGEL Lata” = JES
> iz
| NO
- ==
| ROBERT E. MAHAN YES
==
NO
=
1 DISTRICT COURT
prea s_t
| JOEL D. NOVAK YES
} SS
NO
! Be
GLENN E. PILLE YES
H ES
: NO
: a)
i SCOTT D. ROSENBERG YES
{ Se
| NO
ROBERT A. HUTCHISON YES _ TIRN THE
, — TURN THE
_ __ BALLOT OVER |
= pf =
Ee
enmal TiDiad- AV) ore’ West Des Moines 11
pt ** County Auditor and Style 138 Precinct Election Official
= ‘ssioner of Elections Rotation 150 2 ER »
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 424

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the inclusion in 

gross income of Social Security benefits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2003

Mr. PAUL (for himself, Mr. DUNCAN, and Mrs. MUSGRAVE) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the inclusion in gross income of Social Security benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Senior Citizens Tax 

5 Elimination Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INCLUSION IN GROSS INCOME OF SO7 CIAL SECURITY BENEFITS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 86 of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 (relating to social security benefits) 
2

•HR 424 IH 

1 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub2 section: 

3 ‘‘(g) TERMINATION.—This section shall not apply to 

4 any taxable year beginning after the date of the enactment 

5 of this subsection.’’

6 (b) SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST FUNDS HELD HARM7 LESS.—

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—There are hereby appro9 priated (out of any money in the Treasury not other10 wise appropriated) for each fiscal year to each fund 

11 under the Social Security Act or the Railroad Re12 tirement Act of 1974 an amount equal to the reduc13 tion in the transfers to such fund for such fiscal 

14 year by reason of section 86(g) of the Internal Rev15 enue Code of 1986. 

16 (2) NO TAX INCREASES.—It is the sense of the 

17 Congress that tax increases will not be used to pro18 vide the revenue necessary to carry out paragraph 

19 (1).

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 22, 2015

p1214 

# Order

Clerk December 22, 2015

151138(62)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 151138

COA: 314684

Oakland CC: 2011

- 238692

- FC

JEFFREY BERNARD PYNE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 28, 2015

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
EXHIBIT 32(a)**CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) ofLindsay Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended February 29, 2008, I, RichardW. Parod, Principal Executive Officer of the Company and I, Tim J. Paymal, PrincipalFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.        /s/ Richard W. Parod   Richard W. Parod   President and Chief Executive Officer
WAYNE FARMS LLC 

Plaintiff 

v 

JOHN DOE AND 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

Civil Action No.: 20 C 5191 

Judge Feinerman 

Magistrate Judge Valdez 

LINKED IN CORPORATION 

Defendants 

ANSWER TO TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 

NOW COMES TRUIST fka BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY (the "bank"), third 

party in the above-referenced action dated September 18, 2020 and answers the Search Warrant as follows: 

.JL At the time the Warrant was served upon the Bank, or at any time since then until the date of 

this Answer, the bank was and is indebted to the Defendants in the amounts listed below: 

a) Checking account, 

b) Savings account, 

851, Gracie Henderson: Balance, $ 2.00 

395, Gracie Henderson: Balance, $10.00 

The Bank has no knowledge, information or belief that an other person is indebted to the 

Defendants or has any property of the Defendants in his 

This the 23rd day of September, 2020. 

Susan Berry, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: 

That he/she is a Deposit Operations IRS Specialist ofTruist f1<a Branch Banking and Trust Co. 

("BB&T") and he/she has read the foregoing Answer and that the same is true and correct based upon 

his/her review ofTruist flea BB&T's records, except as to those matters therein alleged on information and 

belief and as to those he/she believes them to be true. 

AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME 

My Commission Expires: 

Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 43 Filed: 01/06/21 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:468
 

Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 43 Filed: 01/06/21 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:469
Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 43 Filed: 01/06/21 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:470
 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 43 Filed: 01/06/21 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:471
 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 43 Filed: 01/06/21 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:472
Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 43 Filed: 01/06/21 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:473
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 70200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27902]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLCO956000 L14200000.BJ0000]


Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey; Colorado

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey; Colorado.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Colorado State Office is 
publishing this notice to inform the public of the official filing of 
the survey plat listed below. The plat will be available for viewing at 
http://www.glorecords.blm.gov.

DATES: The plat described in this notice was filed on August 28, 2014.

ADDRESSES: BLM Colorado State Office, Cadastral Survey, 2850 Youngfield 
Street, Lakewood, CO 80215-7093.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randy Bloom, Chief Cadastral Surveyor 
for Colorado, (303) 239-3856.
    Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may 
call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to 
contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is 
available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to leave a message or 
question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during 
normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The supplemental plat of sections 12 and 13 
in Township 13 South, Range 91 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, 
Colorado, was accepted and filed on November 3, 2014.

Randy Bloom,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Colorado.
[FR Doc. 2014-27902 Filed 11-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
20 16 UT App 148



### T HE 

### U TAH 

### C OURT O F 

### A PPEALS

S TATE OF U TAH , IN THE INTEREST OF D.D.,
A PERSON UNDER EIGHT EEN YEARS OF AGE

.

J.D. , Appell ant , v. S TATE OF U TAH , Appell ee

.
Per Curiam Decision

N o. 20160385

- CA Filed July 14, 2016

Seventh District Juvenile Court, Price Department The Honorable Mary L. Manley No. 1126964

Thomas D. Sitterud , Attorney for Appellant Sean D. Reyes and John M. Peterson , Attorney s for Appellee Martha Pierce, Guardian ad Litem

Before J UDGE S J. F REDERIC V OROS J R

. , S TEPHEN L. R OTH , and K ATE A. T OOMEY

.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Appellant J.D. (Father) appeals the adjudication order, entered on May 27, 2016, which concluded that D.D

. was an abused and neglected child within the jurisdiction of the juvenile
court.

¶2 The sole claim on appeal is that the juvenile court erred by not allowing Father an opportunity to testify after he a rrived the end of the trial and as the court was announci ng its decision.In re D.D.

20160385

- CA 2 2016 UT App 148 The trial transcript demonstrates that neither Father nor his counsel requested that he be allowed to testify or otherwise address the court after Father’s belated arrival at the adjudication hearing. It is undisputed that Father had notic e of the adjudication hearing , that he was represented by counsel at the hearing , and that this counsel cross

- examined the State’s witness. Father argues before this court that because the juvenile court had stated earlier in the hearing that Father could participate if he arrived and because the court had not entered

a n order, the court erred by no t “ allowing [ Father ] an opportunity to present testimony.”

¶3 The argument lacks merit. After obtaining permission to once more check to see if Father had arrived a t the courthouse, Father’s counsel stated, “So not having the chance f or him to testify, I’ll make a closing based on the evidence that was presented today.” The juvenile court then made findings on the remaining issues disputed by Father and announced its decision. Father’s counsel then stated, “[I]f I could just for the record reflect that [Father] is here, he . . . showed up when the Court did announce and came through the door.” However, counsel did not r equest that Father then be allowed to testify. Noting that Father arrived “41 minutes late,” the court stated, “You can talk to your lawyer about what took place today, the hearing was set for 10:00, you had notice and you had counsel, so we continued.” Under the circumstances, Father has not demonstrated that he was denied an opportunity to participate in the adjudication hearing or that he made a ny timely request to testify in order to preserve the issue he seek s to raise on appeal.

¶4 Affirmed.
Specifications, Tolerances, and

Other Technical Requirements for

Weighing and Measuring Devices

as adopted by the 95th

National Conference on

Weights and Measures 2010

NIST Handbook

2011

44
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this registration statement of our report dated January 27, 1998
included in Newmont Gold Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1997 and to all references to our Firm included in this registration statement.



                                               /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Denver, Colorado
July 13, 1998
Innovations in 

Federal Technology Transfer

Jim Jaffe

March 16, 2010

NASVF Overview

Global Organization

 43 States – 4 Countries

Membership

1/3 - Private Seed & 

Early-Stage Funds

1/3 - State and Regional 

Economic Development

1/3 – Incubators; 

University and Federal T2; Research Parks; Corporate R & D

650+ members

Supply

Stage

Source

Demand

POC / 

Pre-Seed Seed/Start-Up Early Later

Founders

FFF Angel Groups, TBED, SBIR, Seed Funds Venture Funds

$25K $100K $2, 000M $5, 000M

Funding 

Gap

Secondary Funding Gap

Innovation Capital Valley of Death 

“VALLEY OF DEATH”

$500K

Slide courtesy of Innovation America 2009

Category State of 

PA

CDVCA State 

UTA

Funds Invested

$90M $26M $60M 

Jobs Created

8,150 3.700 2,04

$ Per JobInvested

$11,000 $7,100 $29,3

Public Investment Jo
Creative Funding Opportunities

Where Will Funding Come Where Will Funding Come 

From.........

To............ 

Commercialize Commercialize 

Technology?

ATIP 

 Partner with selected economic developmen

enhance the effectiveness of the ARS technoprogram and to expand its impact

 Enhance the flow of ARS technologies to sm

expanding businesses and to encourage tececonomic development

USDA ARS ATIP Commercialization Model

NASVF Conference

17th Annual NASVF International C

October 13-15, 2010

Baltimore, Maryland

WWW.NASVF.ORG
A Call to Action

“Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it has to be US.”

--Jerry Garcia of the 

Grateful Dead
11068.

#### Barlow *v.*The State.

Decided January 6, 1920.

Conviction of sale of intoxicating liquor; from Wheeler superior court—Judge Graham. October 4, 1919.

*O. M. Dulce,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. A. Wooten, solicitor-general,*contra.

Bboyles, C. J.

1. The exceptions pendente lite, not being referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned.

2. The excerpt from the charge of the court complained of, when considered in connection with its context, was not erroneous for any reason assigned.

3. The alleged newly discovered evidence was largely cumulative and impeaching in its character, and it does not appear that the judge abused his discretion in overruling the special ground of the motion for a new trial based thereon.

4. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and, having been approved by the trial judge, this court has no authority to set it aside.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
#### G. F. Hendron, etc., *v.*Olivia Adams, etc.

Appeal — Verity of Record.

The verity of the record of the oath of office of a regular judge and of a special judge, cannot be considered by the Court of Appeals, where it is made to appear only in the brief of counsel.

Judges — Regularity of Election — Presumption.

The fact that one of the plaintiffs in the court'below was a married woman cannot destroy the presumption that the judge who decided the cause was properly chosen and sworn.

APPEAL FROM McCRAOKEN CIRCUIT COURT.

March 6, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor :

We find nothing in the case upon which to base an opinion except the petition, answer and exhibit filed. The deposition of witness Dunn seems never to have been filed in the case, nor is there any agreement of record that it was to be read upon the hearing in the court below.

*542
      *Marshall & Bloomfield, 1. Campbell, Jr., Rodman, for appellant.*

*L. D. Husbands, for appellee.*

The record of the oath of office taken by the regular judge and afterwards by the special judge, who was elected during the term at which the present case was tried, can not be considered by this court. It is made to appear in the brief of counsel only, and it is certainly evident that the verity of the record can not be impeached in this way. The fact that one of the plaintiffs in the court below is a married woman will not destroy the presumption that the judge deciding the cause was properly chosen and sworn. It may be that he was the judge holding the entire terrh' of the court, and such must be the judgment of this court, based upon the record before us. If Dunn’s testimony, however, was in the case, there is still nothing in the record • authorizing a recovery, as he makes no explanation of the manner and extent of the holding by any of the parties, nor is there any evidence as against these defendants that the plaintiffs were ever legally evicted off the land in dispute.

The judgment is *affirmed.*
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DoubleClick Inc. (the
Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Kevin P.
Ryan, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|                          |  |                                                         
|------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|                          |  | /s/ KEVIN P. RYAN

Kevin P. Ryan
Chief Executive Officer
|                          |  |                                                         
|Dated: November  14, 2003 |  |