alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Criminal Justice Center  509 West 11th Street  Austin, Texas 78701

Rosemary Lehmberg  Travis County District Attorney

P.O. Box 1748 Austin, Texas 78767  Telephone: 512-854-9400  Fax: 512-854-9695

February 11, 2015

Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk

Third Court of Appeals

P.O. Box 12547, Capitol Station

Austin, Texas 78711

Re: Court of Appeals Number: 03-13-00490-CR through 03-13-00493-CR; 03-13-00495-CR

Trial Court Cause Number: D1-DC-13-900010, etc.

Styled: Gerald Christopher Zuliani v. State of Texas

Dear Mr. Kyle:

This is to acknowledge receipt of your notice, dated February 6, 2015, that the above-referenced causes

have been set for oral argument on Wednesday, March 11, 2015, at 9:00 A.M.

Please inform the Court that the State will be represented at the scheduled time by M. Scott Taliaferro.

Sincerely,

/s/ M. Scott Taliaferro

M. Scott Taliaferro

Assistant District Attorney

State Bar No. 00785584

P.O. Box 1748

Austin, Texas 78767

(512) 854-9400

Fax No. (512) 854-4810

Scott.Taliaferro@traviscountytx.gov

AppellateTCDA@traviscountytx.gov

MST:vb

cc: Christopher P. Morgan

Attorney at Law

chrismorganlaw@cs.com

ACCEPTED

03-13-00490-CR

4106939

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

2/11/2015 12:01:38 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/11/2015 12:01:38 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
GUIDE HALL RADIATION MONITORING UPDATE

EMMA DAMAZO, BRUNSWICK HIGH SCHOOL

SCOTT ARNESON

DAGISTAN SAHIN, PHD
INTRODUCTION

 Guide Hall radiation 

monitors’ data are saved 

on local computer

 Inaccessible from the 

internet where most 

monitoring systems are 

available

 Data must be accessible 

from the NBSR web 

application

NCNR Guide Hall

Credit: Yiming Qui, April 17, 2017

Area Radiation Monitor

Credit: Scott Arneson
OLD SYSTEM

 Allows remote access

 Data are stored in backed-up location

 Less storage space required

NEW SYSTEM

 Health Physics checks local computer 

twice daily for alarms

 Data can be lost if local computer 

crashes
WINDOWS SERVICES

 Runs in background

 Ideal for long-term use

 No user interaction

 Starts upon computer restart

Microsoft.com

Pluralsight.com
GUIDE HALL ARM DAQ SERVICE STRUCTURE

Request
FEATURES

 Reduces amount of storage required for data

 Saves up to a day’s worth of data in queue if connection to remote database is lost

 Makes ARM data accessible in a central location
DATABASE STRUCTURE

Monitor Data

• Timestamp

• Monitor value 

(x25)

SQL Express Database 

Structure

Current Values

• ID

• Tag Name

• Timestamp

• Values

Individual Monitor 

History

• ID

• Timestamp

• Value

MS-SQL Database 

Structure
WEB APPLICATION

 Similar to a website – accessible from 

web browsers but stored on a server

 NBSR web app displays data related 

to the condition of the reactor or 

radiation exposure of people around 

NCNR

 Uses Windows Authentication for 

security
GUIDE HALL MIMIC

 Displayed as an SVG file – interactivity, scripting 

features

Credit: Yiming Qui
GUIDE HALL MIMIC

 Displayed as an SVG file – interactivity, scripting 

features

Credit: Yiming Qui
GUIDE HALL TRENDING PAGE

 Allows individual monitor 

trending or custom group 

trending
FUTURE PROJECTS

 Add a table of monitors to mimic to locate monitors easily

 Add alarm function for high radiation levels

 Add email function to alert HP or ROE of alarms or broken monitors
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

 Dagistan Sahin and Scott Arneson

 Julie Borchers, Joe Dura, and Yamali

Hernandez

 Members of the NCNR ROE group

 ROE SURFers

 NCNR SHIP students and mentors

 NCNR and CHRNS

Credit: Scott Arneson Credit: Kirill Stakhovsky

Credit: Yiming Qiu
QUESTIONS
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4189 

To modify and improve the funding structure of the Environmental Quality 

Incentives Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2004 

Mr. LUCAS of Oklahoma introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To modify and improve the funding structure of the 

Environmental Quality Incentives Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Full Enrollment Envi5 ronmental Quality Incentives Program (FEEQIP) Act of 

6 2004’’. 
2 

•HR 4189 IH 

1 SEC. 2. FUNDING OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN2 CENTIVES PROGRAM. 

3 Section 1241(a)(6) of the Food Security Act of 1985 

4 (16 U.S.C. 3821(a)(6)) is amended by striking all that 

5 follows ‘‘chapter 4’’ and inserting a period. 

Æ
##### 



EXHIBIT 12 AMERICAN STANDARD COMPANIES INC.
COMPUTATION OF THE RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Dollars in Millions) Three MonthsFor the Years ended December 31,
    
    Ended March 31,1999
    
    2000
    
    2001
    
    2002
    
    2003
    
    2003
    
    2004Income from continuing
operations before income taxes
    
    $
    451.5
    
    
    $
    509.4
    
    
    $
    476.4
    
    
    $
    556.2
    
    
    $
    549.2
    
    
    $
    92.5
    
    
    $
    122.6Equity in net (income) loss of
associated companies net of dividends
received
    
    
    (5.1
    )
    
    
    (8.7
    )
    
    
    (2.8
    )
    
    
    (13.5
    )
    
    
    (14.3
    )
    
    
    (1.1
    )
    
    
    (5.4
    )Amortization of capitalized interest
    
    
    1.8
    
    
    
    1.9
    
    
    
    2.3
    
    
    
    2.3
    
    
    
    2.3
    
    
    
    .6
    
    
    
    .6Interest expense
    
    
    187.8
    
    
    
    198.7
    
    
    
    168.7
    
    
    
    129.0
    
    
    
    117.0
    
    
    
    30.2
    
    
    
    29.3Rental expense factor
    
    
    33.9
    
    
    
    49.4
    
    
    
    53.2
    
    
    
    58.6
    
    
    
    37.5
    
    
    
    15.0
    
    
    
    9.3Earnings available for fixed charges
    
    $
    669.9
    
    
    $
    750.7
    
    
    $
    697.8
    
    
    $
    732.6
    
    
    $
    691.7
    
    
    $
    137.2
    
    
    $
    156.4Interest expense
    
    $
    187.8
    
    
    $
    198.7
    
    
    $
    168.7
    
    
    $
    129.0
    
    
    $
    117.0
    
    
    $
    30.2
    
    
    $
    29.3Capitalized interest
    
    
    3.3
    
    
    
    2.0
    
    
    
    4.8
    
    
    
    2.6
    
    
    
    0.9
    
    
    
    0.1
    
    
    
    0.1Rental expense factor
    
    
    33.9
    
    
    
    49.4
    
    
    
    53.2
    
    
    
    58.6
    
    
    
    37.5
    
    
    
    15.0
    
    
    
    9.3Fixed charges
    
    $
    225.0
    
    
    $
    250.1
    
    
    $
    226.8
    
    
    $
    190.2
    
    
    $
    155.4
    
    
    $
    45.3
    
    
    $
    38.7Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (a)
    
    
    3.0
    
    
    
    3.0
    
    
    
    3.1
    
    
    
    3.9
    
    
    
    4.5
    
    
    
    3.0
    
    
    
    4.0
  a)
    
    For the purpose of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, fixed charges consist of interest on
debt (including capitalized interest), amortization of debt discount and expense, and a portion of rentals
determined to be representative of interest. Earnings consist of consolidated net income before income
taxes, plus fixed charges other than capitalized interest but including the amortization thereof, adjusted
by the excess or deficiency of dividends over income of entities accounted for by the equity method.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-40917 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ESTEBAN MARQUEZ-CONDE, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-03-CR-225-1

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Esteban Marquez-Conde appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being found in the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Marquez-Conde argues pursuant to Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are elements of the offense, not sentenceenhancements, making those provisions unconstitutional. MarquezConde concedes that this argument is foreclosed byNo. 03-40917 -2- Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), and he raises it for possible review by the Supreme Court. Marquez-Conde’s Apprendi argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , 523 U.S. at 235. We must follow the precedent set in Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000) (internal quotation and citation omitted).
AFFIRMED.
#### BEVERIDGE v. BI-LO, INC.

No. 82P97

Case below: 125 N.C.App. 214

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 May 1997.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TANDY
BRANDS ACCESSORIES, INC.'S MARCH 31, 1998 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FILINGS. DOLLARS ARE IN THOUSANDS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,006
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,091
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,819
<INVENTORY>                                     33,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,707
<PP&E>                                          10,735
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,523
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  75,411
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,301
<BONDS>                                         19,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,576
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,502
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    75,411
<SALES>                                        100,658
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               100,658
<CGS>                                           63,488
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   63,488
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,343
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 989
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,838
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,791
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,047
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,047
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.07
        

</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4194 

To reduce temporarily the royalty required to be paid for sodium produced 

on Federal lands, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2004 

Mrs. CUBIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Resources 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the royalty required to be paid for 

sodium produced on Federal lands, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Soda Ash Royalty Re5 duction Act of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 The Congress finds the following: 

8 (1) The combination of global competitive pres9 sures, flat domestic demand, and spiraling costs of 
2 

•HR 4194 IH 

1 production threaten the future of the United States 

2 soda ash industry. 

3 (2) Despite booming world demand, growth in 

4 United States exports of soda ash since 1997 has 

5 been flat, with most of the world’s largest markets 

6 for such growth, including Brazil, the People’s Re7 public of China, India, the countries of eastern Eu8 rope, and the Republic of South Africa, have been 

9 closed by protectionist policies. 

10 (3) The People’s Republic of China is the prime 

11 competitor of the United States in soda ash produc12 tion, and recently supplanted the United States as 

13 the largest producer of soda ash in the world. 

14 (4) Over 700 jobs have been lost in the United 

15 States soda ash industry since the Department of 

16 the Interior increased the royalty rate on soda ash 

17 produced on Federal land, in 1996. 

18 (5) Reduction of the royalty rate on soda ash 

19 produced on Federal land will provide needed relief 

20 to the United States soda ash industry and allow it 

21 to increase export growth and competitiveness in 

22 emerging world markets, and create new jobs in the 

23 United States. 
3 

•HR 4194 IH 

1 SEC. 3. REDUCTION IN ROYALTY RATE ON SODA ASH. 

2 Notwithstanding section 24 of the Mineral Leasing 

3 Act (30 U.S.C. 262) and the terms of any lease under 

4 that Act, the royalty rate on soda ash produced on Federal 

5 land in the 5-year period beginning on the date of the en6 actment of this Act shall be 2 percent. 

7 SEC. 4. STUDY. 

8 After the end of the 4-year period beginning on the 

9 date of the enactment of this Act, and before the end of 

10 the 5-year period beginning on that date, the Secretary 

11 of the Interior shall report to the Congress on the effects 

12 of the royalty reduction under this Act, including— 

13 (1) the amount of soda ash produced on Fed14 eral land during that 4-year period; 

15 (2) the number of jobs that have been created 

16 or maintained as a result of the royalty reduction; 

17 (3) the total amount of royalty paid to the 

18 United States on soda ash produced during that 4- 

19 year period; and 

20 (4) a recommendation of whether the reduced 

21 royalty rate should apply after the end of the 5-year 

22 period beginning on the date of the enactment of 

23 this Act. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
INTERIM STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                         165,846
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,948
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    201,860
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               497,065
<PP&E>                                       1,891,794
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,548,451
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 992,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,552,526
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              396
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,566,667
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   992,465
<SALES>                                        438,908
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               438,908
<CGS>                                          223,563
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  223,563
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,446,798
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             669,428
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,650,781)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,650,781)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,650,781)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
            Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

I, Peter Katevatis, Chief Executive Officer of Mediscience Technology Corp.,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Mediscience Technology
Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: June 13, 2005                               Name: ss Peter Katevatis
                                                        ------------------
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Patriot Scientific Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification
      is
      an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of Patriot Scientific
      Corporation does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
      knowledge:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                April
                19, 2006By:
              /s/ David
                H.
                PohlDavid
                H. Pohl*Chief
                Executive Officer*
HMM Reference NIST Technical Note 2205: Item 36 Pergola / Trellis

Item 36 Pergola / Trellis – Do not attach combustible materials to the house exterior; keep pergola / trellis 2 ft from home.

Metal pergola away from house

Wood pergola

attached

to house

Burned wood pergola and home at attachment

Burned wood 

post 

away from 

home

Note: Selected photographs are included to illustrate each HMM hardening item. Additional vulnerabilities or hardening items may be seen in the photographs, but those are highlighted within their specific HMM item.
There is no CAD drawing for 

Item 36: Pergola/trellis 

Please see photographs for illustrations.
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, each of the undersigned officers of Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such
officers knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  September 3, 2004







/s/    Kunio NakamuraName:

Kunio NakamuraTitle:

President and Director(Principal Executive Officer)/s/    Tetsuya KawakamiName:

Tetsuya KawakamiTitle:

Senior Managing Director(Principal Financial Officer)