alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,411
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,190
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,950
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     16,103
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          11,004
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            11,068
<LOANS>                                         27,896
<ALLOWANCE>                                        605
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,824
<DEPOSITS>                                      58,706
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                230
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           600
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,140
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  67,824
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    647
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  411
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    90
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,148
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 352
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 354
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              794
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    349
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         349
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       245
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.36
<LOANS-NON>                                        265
<LOANS-PAST>                                         5
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    13
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   600
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        2
<RECOVERIES>                                         7
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  605
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            605
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM
     NIGHTINGALE,  INC.'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
     ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     67

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         67
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               219,763
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 219,763
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          352,370
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       20,600
<OTHER-SE>                                     (153,207)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (132,607)
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,780
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               8,941
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,161)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,161)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.01)



</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      OF PERIODIC REPORT**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Alpha Nutra,
      Inc.(the “Company”), certifies that:




1.  The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,
      2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







September
      20, 2006








By:
            /s/Mark
                L. Baum
              Mark
                L. Baum
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer





This
      certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
      to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
      purpose.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                         307,301
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               307,301
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 307,301
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,643
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,002
<OTHER-SE>                                     285,656
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   307,301
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,601
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,773
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                65,180
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (93,352)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (93,352)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[No. 1780.]

#### Pedro Peralto *v.*The State.

Theft.—Indictment for theft should specifically charge that the intent of the accused was to deprive the owner of the stolen property “of the value of the same.” These statutory words, being essential to define theft, cannot be supplied by inference and intendment.

Appeal from the District Court of Bexar. Tried below before the Hon. G. II. Noonan.

The conviction was for the theft of a watch, of the value of $75, and a chain of the value of $10, the property of A. Bland and C. E. Wynne, in Bexar coupty, Texas, on the 12th day of Hay, 1884. A term of two years in the penitentiary was the penalty assessed against the appellant.

No brief for the appellant. »

*J. H. Burts,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

White, Presiding Judge.

The indictment, which was for theft, does not specifically charge that the intent was to deprive the owners of the stolen property “ of the value of the same,” and it is only by inference and intendment that these statutory words, made essential in the definition of theft, can be supplied. *(State*v. *Sherlock,*26 Texas, 106; *Ridgeway*v. *The State,*41 Texas, 231; *Jones*v. *The State,*12 Texas Ct. App., 424; *Tallant*v. *The State,*14 Texas Ct. App., 234.)

The indictment being defective, the judgment is reversed and the prosecution dismissed.

*Beversed and dismissed.*

[Opinion delivered February 14, 1885.]
Order entered July 16, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

of

No. 05-20-00741-CR

JEFRY SAUL ZUNIGALAINEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F19-22628-H

ORDER

Before the Court is the State’s July 13, 2021 motion for an extension of time 

to file its brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief received with the 

motion filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
10633.

#### Etter *v.*The State.

Luke, J.

The defendant was indicted and tried for the offense of assault with intent to murder, and was convicted of the offense of shooting at another. By motion for a new trial she assigned error upon the *276court’s failure to charge the jury the law of circumstantial evidence, and upon the charge on the defense of alibi. The person alleged to have been shot having testified positively that the defendant shot her, and the State’s case not depending wholly upon circumstantial evidence, it was not error (there being no request so to do) to fail to charge the law as to circumstantial evidence. See *Nobles*v. *State,*127 *Ga.*212 (56 S. E. 125). The charge on alibi was full and in accord with *Ransom*v. *State,*2 *Ga. App.*826 (59 S. E. 101), and cases cited. Por n'o reason assigned (there being evidence to authorize the verdict approved by the trial judge) was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Decided October 14, 1919.

Conviction of sbooting at another; from Walker superior court— Judge Wright. May 2, 1919.

*O. N. Chambers, Rosser & Shaw,*for plaintiff in error.

*C. H. Porter, solicitor-general,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed,.*

*Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J.,*concur.
10004.

#### McRae *v.*The State.

Decided November 7, 1918.

Indictment for manufacture of intoxicating liquor; from Wilcox superior court—Judge Crum. June 26, 1918.

The indictment charged the accused with “the offense of making liquor, for that,” on the 12th day of May, 1918, in Wilcox county, he did “unlawfully and with force and arms knowingly permit and allow to be located on his premises and did possess apparatus for the manufacture of intoxicating liquors, wines, and beers, contrary to the laws,” etc. The demurrer was on the following grounds: (1) No offense is charged. (2) The indict-

ment fails to allege by whom the apparatus for the manufacture of liquors was located on the premises of the defendant. The contrary not appearing, the presumption would be that the apparatus was located on the said premises and in the possession of the defendant ; which, if true, would constitute no offense against the laws of this State. (3) There should be stricken from the indictment the words, “and did possess;” for these words, taken in connection with the'words, “apparatus for the manufacture of intoxicating liquors,” etc.', would constitute no offense.

*M. B. Gannon,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. B. Wall, solicitor-general,*contra.

Broyles, P. J.

The indictment, drawn under section 22 of the act approved March 28, 1917 (Acts of Extraordinary Session, March 20-28, 1917, p. 18), sufficiently charged a criminal offense under the laws of this State, and was not subject to the demurrer interposed. Accordingly the court did not err in overruling the demurrer and! in refusing to quash the indictment.

*■Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and*Harwell, *JJ., concur.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8002

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GEORGE BILLY LEE GANTT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (8:04-cr-01013-HFF-1)

Submitted: February 27, 2009 Decided: March 16, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Billy Lee Gantt, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Lance Crick, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

George Billy Lee Gantt appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Gantt , No. 8:04-cr-01013-HFF-1 (D.S.C. Sept. 5, 2008).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha
Nutra, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Pu Yue, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and will be retained by China
Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


May
      20, 2009
                
                /s/
      Pu YuePuYue (Principal Accounting and
      Financial Officer)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.8



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
report dated May 14, 1997, on the financial statements of Ameron Broadcasting, 
Inc. (and to all references to our firm) included in or made a part of this
registration statement.

                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



St. Louis, Missouri
   
May 22, 1998
H. Res. 505

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 23, 1998.

Whereas the South Pacific region covers an immense area of

the earth, approximately 3 times the size of the contiguous United States;

Whereas the United States seeks to maintain strong and enduring economic, political, and strategic ties with the Pacific island countries of the region, despite the reduced

diplomatic presence of the United States in the region

since World War II;

Whereas Pacific island nations wield control over vast tracts

of the ocean, including seabed minerals, fishing rights,

and other marine resources which will play a major role

in the future of the global economy;

Whereas access to these valuable resources will be vital in

maintaining the position of the United States as the leading world power in the new millennium;

Whereas Asian countries have already recognized the important role that these Pacific island nations will play in the

future of the global economy, as evidenced by the Tokyo

summit meeting in October 1997 with various Pacific island heads of state;
2

•HRES 505 EH

Whereas the Pacific has long been regarded as one of the

‘‘last frontiers’’, with an enormous wealth of uncultivated

resources; and

Whereas direct United States participation in the human and

natural resource development of the South Pacific region

would promote beneficial ties with these Pacific island

nations and increase the possibilities of access to the region’s valuable resources: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that—

3 (1) it is in the national interest of the United

4 States to remain actively engaged in the South Pa5 cific region as a means of supporting important

6 United States commercial and strategic interests,

7 and to encourage the consolidation of democratic

8 values;

9 (2) a Pacific island summit, hosted by the

10 President of the United States with the Pacific is11 land heads of government, would be an excellent op12 portunity for the United States to foster and im13 prove diplomatic relations with the Pacific island na14 tions;

15 (3) through diplomacy and participation in the

16 human and natural resource development of the Pa17 cific region, the United States will increase the pos18 sibility of gaining access to valuable resources, thus

19 strengthening the position of the United States as a
3

•HRES 505 EH

1 world power economically and strategically in the

2 new millennium; and

3 (4) the United States should fulfill its long4 standing commitment to the democratization and

5 economic prosperity of the Pacific island nations by

6 promoting their earliest integration in the main7 stream of bilateral, regional, and global commerce

8 and trade.

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             272
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (241)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          38,783
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,687)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,271
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         26,316
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,271
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,464
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,441
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   271
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 616
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    252
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                252
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       252
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4242

To transfer jurisdiction over certain public lands from the Bureau of Land 

Management to the Department of Defense. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2004

Mr. PEARCE (for himself and Mr. LEWIS of California) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To transfer jurisdiction over certain public lands from the 

Bureau of Land Management to the Department of Defense.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF JURISDICTION OVER CERTAIN 

4 PUBLIC LANDS TO DEPARTMENT OF DE5 FENSE. 

6 (a) JURISDICTION TRANSFER.—The Secretary of the 

7 Interior shall transfer to the Secretary of Defense jurisdic8 tion over all public lands—

9 (1) under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of 

10 Land Management; 
2

•HR 4242 IH 

1 (2) withdrawn from appropriation under the 

2 public land laws; and 

3 (3) reserved for use by the Armed Forces for 

4 military activities. 

5 (b) DEADLINE.—The transfer shall be accomplished 

6 not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of 

7 this section.

Æ
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dimensional Visions Incorporated
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Larry Kohler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Larry Kohler
-----------------------------
Larry Kohler
Chief Financial Officer
November 13, 2002