alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,224,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,330,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,352,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,395,000
<PP&E>                                       5,651,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,057,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,102,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,973,000
<BONDS>                                      1,115,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,629,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,102,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,150,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,785,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,923,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             227,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (785,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (228,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (557,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (557,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit (23)

                                   CONSENT OF
                         INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

    As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our report dated February 25, 2000 included or incorporated by reference in this
annual report on Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed: Form S-8
Registration Statement, File Number 333-44471; Form S-3 Registration Statement,
File Number 333-13929; and Form S-3 Registration Statement, File Number
333-74481.


                                                /s/ Margolis & Company P.C.
                                                ----------------------------
                                                Margolis & Company P.C.
                                                Certified Public Accountants


Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania
April 19, 2000
<PAGE>   1
   
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
    

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

   
As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this registration statement on Form S-3, to be filed on or around
June 15, 1998, of our report dated May 27, 1998 on the Consolidated Financial
Statements of WorldCom, Inc. included in WorldCom Inc.'s Current Report on Form
8-K dated May 28, 1998 (filed May 28, 1998) and to all references to our Firm
included in this registration statement.
    

                                                    ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

   
Jackson, Mississippi,
June 12, 1998.
566 A.2d 938

#### In re Appeal of Autohaus Lancaster, Inc. from the decision of the Manheim Township Zoning Hearing Board, in regard to Case No. 88-11. Appeal of AUTOHAUS LANCASTER, INC.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued Nov. 13, 1989.

Decided Dec. 6, 1989.

William J. Cassidy, Jr., Lancaster, for appellant.

Christopher S. Underhill, Hartman, Underhill & Brubaker, Lancaster, for appellee/intervenor.

Before DOYLE and PALLADINO, JJ., and NARICK, Senior Judge.

NARICK, Senior Judge.

Autohaus Lancaster, Inc. (Appellant) has appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County which affirmed a decision of the Manheim Township *32Zoning Hearing Board (Board) directing Appellant to remove a Volkswagen vehicle from the roof of its property.

The township’s code compliance officer had determined that Appellant was in violation of the township’s zoning ordinance governing signs. Appellant appealed to the Board, which affirmed the compliance officer’s decision. On appeal to common pleas court, Appellant raised seven issues. That court, without taking additional evidence, thoroughly addressed each issue and ultimately affirmed the Board.

The issues on appeal to this Court are identical to those raised before the trial court. Judge Michael A. Georgelis, in a comprehensive and well-reasoned opinion, ably disposed of all seven issues. We agree with his analysis and, accordingly, affirm on the basis of his opinion reported at *In Re: Appeal of Autohaus Lancaster, Inc.,*— Pa.D. & C.3d - (1989) (No. 1768 of 1988, filed February 13, 1989).

ORDER

AND NOW, this 6th day of December, 1989, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County in the above-captioned matter is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Michael A. Georgelis.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50683 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARIO REYES-GURROLA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:03-CR-1894-ALL-KC

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Mario ReyesGurrola raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### Barnes *v.*Carey

No. 6443.

December 13, 1928.

Rehearing denied January 25, 1929.

*Mozley & Gann*and *Jesse Moore,*for plaintiff.

*George & John L. Westmoreland,*for defendant.

Hill, J.

It not appearing that any error oí law was committed pending-the trial, as complained of in the motion for new trial, and as it can not be said that the evidence in favor of the prevailing party was weak or unsatisfactory, the judge erred in granting a second new trial. *Merchants & Miners Transportation Co.*v. *Corcoran,*4 *Ga. App.*654 (2), 659 (62 S. E. 130), and cit.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
August 1999 

NCWM Amends UPLR to Allow Metric-Only Labeling 

The National Conference on Weights and Measures (NCWM) voted to amend the 

Uniform Packaging and Labeling Regulation (UPLR) to allow manufacturers the option 

of using metric-only labeling. The amendment exempts packages with appropriate metric 

units from the requirement for inch-pound units. Packagers can either label packages 

with only metric units or metric and inch-pound units. The exemption does not apply to 

foods, drugs, or cosmetics under control of the Food and Drug Administration or to 

products subject to Federal Trade Commission Regulations. 

Nothing in the amendment applies to unit pricing, advertising, recipe programs, 

nutritional labeling, or other general pricing information. Nothing in the amendment will 

be construed to require changes in package size or in any way affects the size of 

packages. The NCWM believes that the additional option will allow packagers and the 

marketplace to determine when metric-only is appropriate. 

The amendment is as follows: Inch-Pound Units, Exemptions - Consumer Commodities. 

The requirement for statements of quantity in inch-pound units will not apply to packages 

that bear appropriate SI units. This exemption does not apply to foods, drugs, or 

cosmetics or to packages subject to Federal Trade Commission Regulation, meat and 

poultry products subject to Federal Meat or Poultry Products Inspection Acts, and 

tobacco or tobacco products.
Exhibit 4.4


 


ACKNOWLEDGMENT


 


The
undersigned hereby acknowledges that (a) it has received a copy of the
foregoing Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of April 16, 2004 (the “Intercreditor Agreement”; undefined
capitalized terms used in this Acknowledgment have the meanings assigned to
them in the Intercreditor Agreement), by and among U.S. Bank National
Association, as Trustee and Secured Party, and Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc.,
as Credit Facility Lender (as defined below), and consents thereto, and agrees
to recognize all rights granted thereby to the Parties, and will not do any act
or perform any obligation that is not in accordance with the agreements set
forth in such Intercreditor Agreement; and (b) it is not an intended
beneficiary or third party beneficiary under the Intercreditor Agreement.


 


Dated: June 30,
2005


 





















 


	
   

  	
  DIAMOND JO
  WORTH CORP., as a Guarantor

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Natalie
  A. Schramm

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Natalie A.
  Schramm

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Chief
  Financial Officer
10574.

#### Hammond *v.*Director-General of Railroads.

Decided December 23, 1919.

Action for damages; from Henry superior court—Judge Searcy. April *22,*1919.

Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court.

*Reagan & Reagan, Reuben R. Arnold,*for plaintiff.

*Harris, Harris & Witman, Smith & Turner,*for defendant.

Jenkins, P. J.

The judgment of the court below in this case having been based upon the decision of this court in *Knight*v. *Savannah Electric Co.,*20 *Ga. App.*314 (93 S. E. 17), and the principle involved in the *Knight*case having been overruled by the recent decision of the Supreme Court in *Central of Georgia Ry. Co.*v. *Moore,*149 *Ga.*581 (101 S. E. 588), on a question certified to it by this court, the judgment of the court below in the instant ease, sustaining the demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition, must be reversed. The ruling here made disposes of the only question argued in the briefs of counsel.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.*
NVLAP LAB BULLETIN NUMBER: LB-153-2024r1 PAGE: 1 of 1 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Institute of Standards and Technology 

National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation 

Program

ISSUE DATE: 

January 11, 2024

LAB BULLETIN 

NUMBER:

LB-153-2024r1

LAP: Cryptographic and 

Security Testing 

SUBJECT: Change to the minimum number of vendor product test report submissions as a 

measure of the laboratory’s ongoing proficiency. 

 

Background

Test report submissions are used by the validation authority as a measure to determine the 

laboratory’s ongoing proficiency.

Purpose

The purpose of this bulletin is to announce a change to the minimum number of test report 

submissions as a measure of the laboratory’s ongoing proficiency. This bulletin becomes part of 

the NIST Handbook 150-17:2022 CST testing criteria, until such time as the next edition of the 

handbook is published. 

Notice

The change to the current requirement, found in NIST Handbook 150-17:2022, Section 

B.3.5.3.b, is that laboratories shall submit a minimum of two (2) test reports annually (every 12 

calendar months) to the validation authority to demonstrate continued testing proficiency. 

There remains no requirement for a test report submission during the first year of accreditation.

Implementation of Changes

This change is effective upon publication of this bulletin. 

Please retain this NVLAP lab bulletin with your copy of NIST Handbook 150-22:2022 for future 

reference. 

An accredited laboratory shall continue to maintain an Extended Cost Recovery (ECR) point 

total of less than 12 points on an ongoing two-year period (reference Lab Bulletin LB-149-2023).

Questions regarding the changes to the NVLAP CST LAP requirements should be directed to 

Brad Moore, bradley.moore@nist.gov.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4232 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4232

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 4025 Feather Lakes Way in Kingwood, Texas, as the ``Congressman Jack 
                         Fields Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2004

Mr. Brady of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 4025 Feather Lakes Way in Kingwood, Texas, as the ``Congressman Jack 
                         Fields Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONGRESSMAN JACK FIELDS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Redesignation.--The facility of the United States Postal 
Service located at 4025 Feather Lakes Way in Kingwood, Texas, and known 
as the Kingwood Post Office, is hereby redesignated as the 
``Congressman Jack Fields Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Congressman 
Jack Fields Post Office.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

BRIAN HAYWOOD and

MARQUEES FRENCH

No. 20 CR 546

Judge Virginia M. Kendall

GOVERNMENT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME

TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT FRENCH’S MOTIONS

The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, through JOHN R. LAUSCH, JR., 

United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, hereby moves for an order 

to extend the date for the government to respond to motions filed by defendant

Marquees French to February 1, 2021 and defendant’s reply to the motions on 

February 8, 2021, and in support thereof states as follows: 

1. The indictment in this case charged defendants Brian Haywood and 

Marquees French with one count of knowingly selling or disposing of a firearm to a

felon in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 922(d)(1). Doc. # 31.

2. On November 4, 2020, the Court set a motion schedule for the parties. 

The schedule set stated that defense motions were due on Monday, January 11, 2021, 

the government’s responses were due on Monday, January 25, 2021, and defendants’

replies were due on Monday, February 1, 2021. Doc. # 38.

3. On January 11 and 12, 2021, defendant French filed his pretrial 

motions. To date, defendant Haywood has yet to file motions. Docs. # 40-44.
2

4. Undersigned counsel for the government reached out to counsel for both 

defendants and requested their position regarding the government requesting an 

additional week to file a response to the motions. Counsel for defendant French stated 

that he did not have an objection. As of this writing, counsel for the government has 

not gotten a response from counsel for Haywood.

WHEREFORE, the government respectfully requests that this Court enter an 

order re-setting the date for the government’s response to defendant French’s motions 

to February 1, 2021 and defendant’s reply to the motions on February 8, 2021.

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. LAUSCH, JR. 

United States Attorney

By: /s/ Albert Berry III

ALBERT BERRY III

Assistant U.S. Attorneys

219 South Dearborn St., Rm. 500

Chicago, Illinois 60604

(312) 886-7855

Dated: January 25, 2021
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4074 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4074

 To amend section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, to require the 
President to include the estimated unfunded liabilities of all Federal 
                 programs in annual budget submissions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 2004

 Mr. Smith of Michigan (for himself, Mrs. Musgrave, Mr. Jones of North 
  Carolina, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Toomey, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. 
 Hostettler, Mr. Pence, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Barrett of South Carolina, Mr. 
Flake, Mr. Garrett of New Jersey, Mr. Feeney, Mr. Culberson, Mr. Weldon 
of Florida, Mrs. Myrick, Mr. Istook, and Mr. Gutknecht) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, to require the 
President to include the estimated unfunded liabilities of all Federal 
                 programs in annual budget submissions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 1105(a) of 
title 31, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new paragraph:
            ``(35) A separate statement setting forth the estimated 
        unfunded liability, if any, of each program--
                    ``(A) as of the close of the fiscal year for which 
                the budget is submitted (assuming enactment of the 
                estimated expenditures and proposed appropriations set 
                forth in the President's budget submission);
                    ``(B) as of the close of the prior fiscal year; and
                    ``(C) for the 20-fiscal-year period and for the 75-
                fiscal-year period beginning with the fiscal year for 
                which the budget is submitted (assuming enactment of 
                the estimated expenditures and proposed appropriations 
                set forth in the President's budget submission).''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| November 6, 2009 |   | By: /s/ | Catherine H. Smith                            |
|------------------|--------|--------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
| (Date)           |   |         | Catherine H. Smith

President

 

  |
exv10w3



 








Exhibit 10.3




CYTRX CORPORATION




NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION




Effective October 1, 2005




	 	 	 	 	 
	BOARD OF DIRECTORS FEES
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Quarterly Retainer
	 	$	2,000.00	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Meetings (Attended in person)
	 	$	2,000.00	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Meetings (Attended telephonically)
	 	$	750.00	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Quarterly Retainer – Chairman
	 	$	6,000.00	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	COMMITTEE CHAIR FEES
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Audit Committee
	 	$	2,000.00	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Compensation Committee
	 	$	1,500.00	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Nomination & Governance Committee
	 	$	1,500.00	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	COMMITTEE MEMBER FEES
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Audit Committee
	 	$	1,000.00	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Compensation Committee
	 	$	1,000.00	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Nomination & Governance Committee
	 	$	1,000.00	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	CHAIR FEES ARE FOR IN-PERSON OR
TELEPHONIC ATTENDANCE
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT FEE
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Each Consent (Board or Committee)
	 	$	750.00
UNI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT FOR THE DI STRI CT OF COLUMBIA

___________________________________ ) AL VI N B . TRUESDAL E, ) ) Plaintiff, )

) v. ) Civil Action No. 08-1862 ( PL F) ) UNI TED STATES DEPARTMENT ) OF JUSTI CE et al. , ) ) Def endants. )

___________________________________ )
ORDER For the re asons stated in the a ccompa nying O pinion, it i s here by ORDERED that def

endant’ s rene wed motion to dismi ss or for summar y judgme nt [Dkt. #60] is GRANTED I N PART and DENI ED I

N PART WI THOUT PREJ UDI CE; it i s FURTHE R ORDERED that, not later than Septembe r 30, 2010, def endant sha ll file either a dispositive motion or a proposed sche dule for r esolution of the outstanding issues in this case. SO ORDERED. /s/ PAULL . FRI EDMAN DATE: August 13, 2010 United States District J udg e
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         102,377
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,677,665
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     72,324
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,869,821
<PP&E>                                       5,357,615
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,423,642
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,038,958
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,828,534
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    340,815
<COMMON>                                         2,236
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,467,373
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,038,958
<SALES>                                      2,355,042
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,355,042
<CGS>                                          665,890
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  730,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (14,343,332)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             114,235
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,187,749
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         15,187,749
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                15,187,749
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.89
        

</TABLE>