alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3852 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3852

 To extend the benefits of the weatherization assistance program under 
  part A of title IV of the Energy Conservation and Production Act to 
           Puerto Rico and the United States Virgin Islands.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2004

  Mr. Acevedo-Vila (for himself and Mrs. Christensen) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the benefits of the weatherization assistance program under 
  part A of title IV of the Energy Conservation and Production Act to 
           Puerto Rico and the United States Virgin Islands.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

    Section 412(8) of the Energy Conservation and Production Act (42 
U.S.C. 6862(8)) is amended by striking ``and the District of Columbia'' 
and inserting ``, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the United 
States Virgin Islands''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 1 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 370-1 Filed: 08/17/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:8352
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

ABC Corporation I et al, 

 Plaintiff,

v. 

THE PARTNERSHIPS and 

UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS 

IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”, 

 Defendants.

CASE NO. 1:20-cv-04806 

Judge: Honorable Thomas M. Durkin

 

DECLARATION OF XIE RONGQING 

I, Xie Rongqing, declare as follows: 

1. I am over eighteen (18) years of age. I make this affidavit based on my own knowledge. 

2. I am the owner of the company Dongguan Saibotan Nengyuan Keji (Energy Tech) Co. Ltd. 

(“Dongguan Saibotan”). Dongguan Saibotan owns and operates the Amazon storefront Gyroor-US. 

3. Gyroor-US has complied with the Court's Preliminary Injunction Orders. 

4. Gyroor-US has ceased selling the accused product and did not assist anyone in selling the accused product. 

5. Gyroor-US did not approve any tag-along merchants. 

6. Tag-along sellers of Gyroor Brand products do not need approval. 

7. Gyroor-US is not affiliated, in active concert of participation with the sellers identified by Plaintiffs. 

8. Gyroor-US does not own or operate www.gyroorboard.com. 

9. Gyroor-US did not transferred money after the account and assets have been frozen. 

10. Amazon.com deducts cost for warehouse storage and product refund directly from the frozen assets. 

11. Gyroor-US has not control over deductions by Amazon.com. 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 370-1 Filed: 08/17/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:8353
2 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed on: 8/17/2021 By: ______________________ 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 370-1 Filed: 08/17/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:8354
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3874 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3874

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To convey for public purposes certain Federal lands in Riverside 
      County, California, that have been identified for disposal.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3874

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To convey for public purposes certain Federal lands in Riverside 
      County, California, that have been identified for disposal.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT LAND IN RIVERSIDE 
              COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--
            (1) Conveyance.--The Secretary of the Interior shall 
        convey, without consideration and subject to valid existing 
        rights, to S.V.D.P. Management Inc-DBA Father Joe's Villages 
        (referred to in this section as the ``Villages''), all right, 
        title, and interest of the United States in and to the parcel 
        described in paragraph (2) for use by the Villages for the 
        purposes described in subsection (b).
            (2)  parcel.--The parcel referred to in paragraph (1) is 
        the parcel of land identified for disposal and consisting of 
        approximately 44 acres under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of 
        Land Management, as generally depicted on the map entitled 
        ``H.R. 3874 Coachella Valley Land Transfer'' and dated March 5, 
        2004.
    (b) Purposes of Conveyance.--The purposes of the conveyance under 
section (a) are to provide a homeless shelter, a training center, and 
affordable housing.
    (c) Reverter.--If the Villages or any subsequent owner of the land 
transferred under this section uses that land for purposes other than 
those described in subsection (b), all right, title, and interest to 
the land (and any improvements thereon) shall revert to the United 
States to be administered by the Bureau of Land Management if the 
Secretary of the Interior determines that such a reversion is in the 
best interests of the United States.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000836809
<NAME> DIMENSIONAL VISIONS GROUP, LTD.
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         106,934
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  349,647
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (215,743)
<INVENTORY>                                    159,679
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               410,518
<PP&E>                                       1,652,811
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,573,936)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 830,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          608,488
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    923,428
<COMMON>                                        73,203
<OTHER-SE>                                   (736,405)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   830,533
<SALES>                                        113,554
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               113,554
<CGS>                                          106,112
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  106,112
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               275,878
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,365
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   138,403
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .002
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
No. 87-1132.

#### Toledo Trust Co., as Trustee of Trust No. 4117, et al. *v.*Santa Barbara Foundation.

Sup. Ct. Ohio. Motions of Ohio Bankers Association Trust Division and American Bankers Association for leave to file briefs as *amici curiae*granted. Certiorari denied.
OFFICIAL REPUBLICAN PRIMARY ELECTION BALLOT

i ia | Madison County (8 State of Idaho ca May 26, 1998 7
mm. INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTER FOR STATE CONTROLLER
| (Vote For ONE) COUNTY OFFICES
all DO NOT VOTE FOR CANDIDATES OF MORE
| THAN ONE PARTY. HAROLD A. ORIEN
a IDAHO LAW PERMITS YOU TO VOTE FOR
| CANDIDATES OF ONLY ONE POLITICAL RON POLLOCK
PARTY IN A PRIMARY.
al IN ADDITION TO VOTING THE PARTY|< > = = = ===
BALLOT, ALL VOTERS MAY VOTE THE
= NON PARTISAN JUDICIAL NOMINATING os RS ATRET tare ome
ELECTION BALLOT.
3a Use Marking Instrument Provided. =a
21 MM tro VOTE, blacken the oval ( —) next to FOR STATE TREASURER > REED B. SOMMER
al the candidate of your choice. To vote a ee
"Write-in" blacken the oval next to the BARBARA LOIS BAUER —>  HARLO B. WALZ
blank line and WRITE THE NAME of your
=. choice ON THE BLANK LINE. RON G. CRANE MARLIN A. HILL
Ee <>  TRUDY J. JACKSON roe Sth weecmemrmmnsere
7 WRITE IN
a a WRTEIN FOR COUNTY COMMISSIONER
z= UNITED STATES OFFICES FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL THIRD DISTRICT - (Vote For ONE)
(Vote For ONE)
es ALAN G. LANCE BROOKE PASSEY
ies FORUNITEDSTATESSENATOR |C> ______________. > HERMAN S. ERICKSON
(Vote For ONE) WRITE IN
ca MIKE CRAPO FOR SUPERINTENDENT OF >  KARREN K. ANDERSON
PUBLIC INSTRUCTION
| MATT LAMBERT plete DAVID L. RASMUSSEN
me. ee RONBLACK #§# ©&=|{> _________------
WRITE IN WRITE IN
mm. FOR REPRESENTATIVE IN ANNE C. FOX FOR CLERK OF THE
a CONGRESS-2nd District DISTRICT COURT
(Vote For ONE) RYAN KERBY (Vote For ONE)
ae ANN RYDALCH TOM MORLEY MARILYN RIGBY RASMUSSEN
| MIKESIMPSON  =s—s—(‘<‘zdt sO" eee JRO L_L__----- +--+ -
WRITE IN WRITE IN
bcd MARK D. STUBBS LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT OFFICES FOR COUNTY TREASURER
(Vote For ONE)
<s DANE WATKINS SHERRY ARNOLD
Beh = ee ee FORLEGISLATIVEDISTRICT 27 |< > ____._________.
WRITE IN FOR STATE SENATOR WRITE IN
ddl ses FOR COUNTY ASSESSOR
STATE OFFICES (Vote For ONE)
Saal ROBERT R. LEE L. BRENT SAUREY
hae FORGOVERNOR=»=—0 |< > ______ ee ROBERT FRANCIS
(Vote For ONE) WRITE IN
a. DIRK KEMPTHORNE FOR LEGISLATIVEDISTRICT 27. |< > ______________-
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE bane
_ —> DAVID SHEPHERD POSITION A - (Vote For ONE) FOR COUNTY CORONER
(Vote For ONE)
RS e- TODD M. HAMMOND RICK DAVIS
WRITE IN
Be FOR LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR mamae wcun 0 OOSS OCLU pe este ek eS eS
(Vote For ONE) WRITE IN
od Be th et a
WRITE IN FOR PRECINCT COMMITTEEMAN AND
cca FOR SECRETARY OF STATE FOR LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT 27 VOTERS’ DELEGATE TO THE PARTY'S
(Vote For ONE} FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE COUNTY AND DISTRICT CONVENTIONS
ime —> PETE T. CENARRUSA POSITION B - (Vote For ONE) (Vote For ONE)
Gee <a a GOLDEN C. LINFORD —> CLIFFORD JAUSSI
WRITE IN -
ee waren ttCt—~*S : TT eee tt—~S
i Am 011 Rexburg [BR Typ:01 Seq:0011 Spl:01 B | Seq:0017 O11
VOTE ONLY ONE SIDE OF BALLOT aires, ae
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 546

Ordering the immediate printing of the entire communication received on

September 9, 1998, from an independent counsel.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 18, 1998

Mr. CONDIT (for himself, Mr. DEUTSCH, and Mr. LAHOOD) submitted the

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Ordering the immediate printing of the entire communication

received on September 9, 1998, from an independent counsel.

Whereas the entire communication of the Office of the Independent Counsel received by the House of Representatives on September 9, 1998, includes information of fundamental constitutional importance;

Whereas the American people have a right to receive and review this communication in its entirety;

Whereas the House Committee on the Judiciary has failed to

make the entire communication available to the American

people; and

Whereas failure to make the entire communication available

to the American people raises a question of privilege affecting the dignity and integrity of the proceedings of the
2

•HRES 546 IH

House under rule IX of the Rules of the House of Representatives: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the entire communication received, in2 cluding all appendices and related materials, on Septem3 ber 9, 1998, from an independent counsel, pursuant to

4 section 595(c) of title 28, United States Code, shall be

5 printed immediately as a document of the House of Rep6 resentatives.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7969

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. JASON CARL THOMAS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:03-cr-00019-BO-1; 5:07—cv-00009-BO)

Submitted: January 13, 2009 Decided: January 20, 2009

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jason Carl Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Neal Fowler, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jason Carl Thomas seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. MillerEl v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Thomas has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
#### Lawrence Edward WILLIAMS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Guillermo MALDONADO, Jr.; Joseph Brooks, Respondents—Appellees.

No. 04-7055.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 30, 2004.

Decided Dec. 29, 2004.

Lawrence Edward Williams, Appellant pro se. Debra Jean Prillaman, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Lawrence Edward Williams, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Williams v. Maldonado,*No. CA-03-603 (E.D.Va. May 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 1681

MIYA GREENE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. ( 1:21

- cv - 00059

- CCE

- JLW )

Submitted : November 22, 2022 Decided: November 28, 2022

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Remanded by un published per curiam opinion

.
Miya Greene , Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Jared Littman , SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL , Baltimore, Maryland, for Appel lee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1681 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/28/2022 Pg: 1 of 32 PER CURIAM: Miya Greene appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and upholding the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) denial of Greene’s application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised
Greene that failure to file timely, specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. After Greene did not file such objections within the allotted time, the district court accepted t he magistrate judge’s recommendation and affirmed the ALJ’s decision. However, on the same day that the district court issued its order, Green filed a “[m]otion to allow opposing motion” and a “[r]esponse [t]o [o]ppose [m]otion.” The district court did n ot rule on those filings before Greene noted this appeal. * Whether Greene has forfeited appellate review of the district court’s order turns on the proper construction and disposition of those documents. We therefore remand to the
district court for the limited purpose of determining whether Greene’s filings are properly construed as her objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation and a motion for an extension of time to file those objections and, if so, for the court to consider those filings

* Although the district court issued an order related to these filings after Greene noted this appeal, it is not apparent that the court had jurisdiction to do so. See, e.g. , Doe v. Public Citizen , 749 F.3d 246, 258 (4th Cir. 2014 ). USCA4 Appeal: 22-1681 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/28/2022 Pg: 2 of 33 in the first instance. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for
further consideration.
REMANDED USCA4 Appeal: 22-1681 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/28/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Jon Michael Miranda v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-14-00590-CR

Trial court case number: 13CR0598

Trial court: 10th Judicial District Court of Galveston County

Appellant, acting pro se, has filed a motion requesting access to a copy of the 

appellate record for use in preparing a response to appointed counsel’s Anders brief, filed 

on October 22, 2014. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 315, 318–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2014); see also Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967). 

However, on October 30, 2014, because we struck counsel’s motion to withdraw and 

Anders brief as deficient, we ordered counsel to file an amended brief, motion, and cover 

letter within 30 days of that order, which would be by December 1, 2014.

Accordingly, we grant the motion and order the trial court clerk, no later than 10 

days from the date of this order, to provide a copy of the record, including the clerk’s 

record, the reporter’s record, and any supplemental records, to the pro se appellant. The 

trial court clerk shall further certify to this Court, within 15 days of the date of this order, 

the date upon which delivery of the record to the appellant is made. Finally, appellant’s 

response to his appointed counsel’s amended brief shall be filed within 45 days of 

December 1, 2014, or by January 15, 2015.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley

  Acting individually 

Date: November 25, 2014
Exhibit 1 

UNREDACTED VERSION OF 

DOCUMENT PROPOSED TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 710-1 Filed: 03/08/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:18217
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

PASCO L. REYNOLDS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-2180

[February 8, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Charles E. Burton, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502013CF010976.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, West Palm Beach, and Valarie 

Linnen, Atlantic Beach, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for 

appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mark J. Hamel, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Defense Acquisition Regulations System

          - 48 CFR Parts 217 and 219

# AGENCY:

Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD).

# ACTION:

Final rule.

# SUMMARY:

DoD is making technical amendments to the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to provide needed editorial changes.

# DATES:

Effective November 13, 2014.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Manuel Quinones, Defense Acquisition Regulations System, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DARS), Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060. Telephone 571-372-6088; facsimile 571-372-6094.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This final rule amends the DFARS as follows:

1. Directs contracting officers to additional procedures and guidance by adding references at 217.207 to DFARS PGI 217.207.

2. Corrects paragraph designation at 219.201.

# List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 217 and 219

      - Government procurement

Manuel Quinones,

Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.

Therefore, 48 CFR parts 217 and 219 are amended as follows:

1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 217 and 219 continues to read as follows:

Authority:41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.

# PART 217—SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

2. Revise section 217.207 to read as follows: 

217.207 

(c) In addition to the requirements at FAR 17.207(c), exercise an option only after determining that the contractor's record in the System for Award Management database is active and the contractor's Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number, Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code, name, and physical address are accurately reflected in the contract document. See PGI 217.207 for the requirement to perform cost or price analysis of spare parts prior to exercising any option for firm-fixed-price contracts containing spare parts.

# PART 219—SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS

219.201 

3. Amend section 219.201 by redesignating paragraphs (d) and (e) as paragraphs (c) and (d) respectively. 

[FR Doc. 2014-26599 Filed 11-12-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P