70554 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 2014 / Notices 

• An agreement among bidders not to 

bid for a particular LA; 

• An agreement among bidders not to 

bid against each other; and 

• Other agreements among bidders 

that have the effect of limiting the final 

auction price. 

Pursuant to 43 U.S.C. 1337(c), BOEM 

will decline to award a lease if it is 

determined by the Attorney General in 

consultation with the Federal Trade 

Commission that doing so would be 

inconsistent with the antitrust laws. 

For more information on whether 

specific communications or agreements 

could constitute a violation of Federal 

antitrust law, please see: http://

www.justice.gov/atr/public/businessresources.html, or consult counsel. 

Bidder’s Financial Form SelfCertification: Each bidder is required to 

sign the self-certification, in accordance 

with 18 U.S.C. 1001 (Fraud and False 

Statements) in the BFF, which can be 

found on BOEM’s Web site: http://

www.boem.gov/State-ActivitiesMassachusetts/. The form must be filled 

out and returned to BOEM in 

accordance with the ‘‘Deadlines and 

Milestones for Bidders’’ section of this 

notice. 

Non-Procurement Debarment and 

Suspension Regulations 

Pursuant to regulations at 43 CFR part 

42, subpart C, an OCS renewable energy 

lessee must comply with the 

Department of the Interior’s nonprocurement debarment and suspension 

regulations at 2 CFR 180 and 1400 and 

agree to communicate the requirement 

to comply with these regulations to 

persons with whom the lessee does 

business as it relates to this lease, by 

including this term as a condition in 

their contracts and other transactions. 

Force Majeure: The Program Manager 

of BOEM’s Office of Renewable Energy 

Programs has the discretion to change 

any auction details, such as the date and 

time, specified in the FSN in case of a 

force majeure event that the Program 

Manager deems may interfere with a fair 

and proper lease sale process. Such 

events may include, but are not limited 

to: natural disasters (e.g., earthquakes, 

hurricanes, floods), wars, riots, acts of 

terrorism, fire, strikes, civil disorder or 

other events of a similar nature. In case 

of such events, bidders should call 703– 

787–1320 or access the BOEM Web site 

at: http://www.boem.gov/RenewableEnergy-Program/index.aspx. 

Appeals: The appeals procedures are 

provided in BOEM’s regulations at 30 

CFR 585.225 and 585.118(c). Pursuant 

to 30 CFR 585.225: 

(a) If BOEM rejects your bid, BOEM 

will provide a written statement of the 

reasons, and refund any money 

deposited with your bid, without 

interest. 

(b) You will then be able to ask the 

BOEM Director for reconsideration, in 

writing, within 15 business days of bid 

rejection, under 30 CFR 585.118(c)(1). 

We will send you a written response 

either affirming or reversing the 

rejection. 

The procedures for appealing final 

decisions with respect to lease sales are 

described in 30 CFR 585.118(c). 

Protection of Privileged or Confidential 

Information 

BOEM will protect privileged or 

confidential information that you 

submit as required by the Freedom of 

Information Act (FOIA). Exemption 4 of 

FOIA applies to trade secrets and 

commercial or financial information 

that you submit that is privileged or 

confidential. If you wish to protect the 

confidentiality of such information, 

clearly mark it and request that BOEM 

treat it as confidential. BOEM will not 

disclose such information, except as 

required by FOIA. Please label 

privileged or confidential information 

‘‘Contains Confidential Information’’ 

and consider submitting such 

information as a separate attachment. 

However, BOEM will not treat as 

confidential any aggregate summaries of 

such information or comments not 

containing such information. 

Additionally, BOEM may not treat as 

confidential the legal title of the 

commenting entity (e.g., the name of 

your company). Information that is not 

labeled as privileged or confidential will 

be regarded by BOEM as suitable for 

public release. 

Dated: November 17, 2014. 

Walter D. Cruickshank, 

Acting Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy 

Management. 

[FR Doc. 2014–27965 Filed 11–25–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management 

[Docket No. BOEM–2014–0078; 

MMAA104000] 

Outer Continental Shelf, Alaska OCS 

Region, Chukchi Sea Planning Area, 

Oil and Gas Lease Sale 193 

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy 

Management (BOEM), Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of Availability of a 

Second Draft Supplemental 

Environmental Impact Statement and 

Notice of Public Hearings; Correction. 

SUMMARY: On November 7, 2014, BOEM 

published a notice in the Federal 

Register (79 FR 66401). BOEM is 

changing the venue for one of the public 

hearing dates. This notice makes that 

change. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public 

Hearings: Pursuant to the regulations 

implementing the procedural provisions 

of NEPA, BOEM will hold public 

hearings on the Second Draft SEIS. The 

hearing scheduled on December 1, 2014, 

previously announced to occur at the 

Loussac Library Complex, will be held 

at a different location. The hearing will 

instead take place at the Crowne Plaza 

Hotel, 109 W. International Airport 

Road, Anchorage, Alaska. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Routhier, Program Analysis 

Officer and Project Manager, BOEM, 

Alaska OCS Region, 3801 Centerpoint 

Drive, Suite 500, Anchorage, Alaska 

99503–5823 or by telephone at (907) 

334–5200. 

Dated: November 17, 2014. 

Walter D. Cruickshank, 

Acting Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy 

Management. 

[FR Doc. 2014–28003 Filed 11–25–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of a Proposed 

Amended Consent Decree Under the 

Clean Water Act 

On November 19, 2014, the 

Department of Justice lodged a proposed 

Amended Consent Decree with the 

United States District Court for the 

Western District of Missouri in the 

lawsuit entitled United States v. The 

City of Kansas City, Missouri, Civil 

Action No. 4:10–cv–0497–GAF, 

proposing to modify the implementation 

schedule for certain injunctive measures 

required under the original Consent 

Decree entered in this matter on 

September 27, 2010, resolving Kansas 

City’s alleged violations of the Clean 

Water Act (‘‘CWA’’ or ‘‘Act’’). 

The Consent Decree (‘‘CD’’) requires, 

among other measures intended to 

reduce or eliminate sewage overflows 

from Kansas City’s sewer system, that 

Kansas City (‘‘KC’’) build 68 million 

gallons of additional storage tank 

capacity at the City’s 87th Street 

Pumping Station in two phases: Phase I 

(20 MM gallons) is due to be completed 

in 2016; Phase II (remaining 48 MM 

gallons) is due to be completed in 2024. 

The proposed Amendment would allow 

the City to defer the Phase I 

construction so that completion of both 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 2014 / Notices 70555 

phases of the project is due upon the 

2024 completion date for Phase II. KC 

has requested this Amendment because 

some or all of this additional capacity 

may become unnecessary. In exchange 

for deferring Phase I of this project, KC 

has agreed to accelerate implementation 

of several other components of the 

injunctive relief required by the Consent 

Decree. 

The publication of this notice opens 

a period for public comment on the 

Consent Decree. Comments should be 

addressed to the Assistant Attorney 

General, Environment and Natural 

Resources Division, and should refer to 

United States v. Kansas City, Civil 

Action No. 4:10–cv–0497–GAF. DJ 

Reference Number 90–5–1–1–06438/1. 

All comments must be submitted no 

later than thirty (30) days after the 

publication date of this notice. 

Comments may be submitted either by 

email or by mail: 

To submit 

comments: Send them to: 

By email ......... pubcommentees.enrd@usdoj.gov. 

By mail ........... Assistant Attorney General, 

U.S. DOJ–ENRD, P.O. 

Box 7611, Washington, 

DC 20044–7611. 

During the public comment period, 

Consent Decree may be examined and 

downloaded at this Justice Department 

Web site: http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/

Consent_Decrees.html. We will provide 

a paper copy of the Consent Decree 

upon written request and payment of 

reproduction costs. Please mail your 

request and payment to: Consent Decree 

Library, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 

7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611. 

Please enclose a check or money order 

for $ 2.75 (25 cents per page 

reproduction cost) payable to the United 

States Treasury. 

Susan M. Akers, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2014–27957 Filed 11–25–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—PXI Systems Alliance, 

Inc. 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

October 28, 2014, pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), PXI 

Systems Alliance, Inc. has filed written 

notifications simultaneously with the 

Attorney General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing changes in its 

membership. The notifications were 

filed for the purpose of extending the 

Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of 

antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages 

under specified circumstances. 

Specifically, Alazar Technologies, Inc., 

Pointe-Claire, Quebec City, CANADA, 

has been added as a party to this 

venture. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and PXI Systems 

Alliance, Inc. intends to file additional 

written notifications disclosing all 

changes in membership. 

On November 22, 2000, PXI Systems 

Alliance, Inc. filed its original 

notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of 

the Act. The Department of Justice 

published a notice in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on March 8, 2001 (66 FR 13971). 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department on August 8, 2014. A 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on September 12, 2014 (79 FR 

54745). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2014–27988 Filed 11–25–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–11–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—Sematech, Inc. D/B/A 

International Sematech 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

October 30, 2014, pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), 

Sematech, Inc. d/b/a International 

Sematech (‘‘SEMATECH’’) has filed 

written notifications simultaneously 

with the Attorney General and the 

Federal Trade Commission disclosing 

changes in its membership. The 

notifications were filed for the purpose 

of extending the Act’s provisions 

limiting the recovery of antitrust 

plaintiffs to actual damages under 

specified circumstances. Specifically, 

TowerJazz Panasonic Semiconductor 

Co., Ltd., Uozo City, JAPAN, has been 

added as a party to this venture. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and SEMATECH 

intends to file additional written 

notifications disclosing all changes in 

membership. 

On April 22, 1988, SEMATECH filed 

its original notification pursuant to 

Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department 

of Justice published a notice in the 

Federal Register pursuant to Section 

6(b) of the Act on May 19, 1988 (53 FR 

17987). 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department on August 1, 2014. A 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on September 3, 2014 (79 FR 

52364). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2014–27986 Filed 11–25–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–11–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

United States V. Flakeboard America 

Limited, Celulosa Arauco Y 

Constitucio ́n, S.A., Inversiones 

Angelini Y Compan ̃ ́ıa, Limitada, and 

Sierrapine; Proposed Final Judgment 

and Competitive Impact Statement 

Notice is hereby given pursuant to the 

Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 

15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h), that a proposed 

Final Judgment, Stipulation and 

Competitive Impact Statement have 

been filed with the U.S. District Court 

for the Northern District of California in 

United States of America v. Flakeboard 

America Limited, Celulosa Arauco y 

Constitucio ́n, S.A., Inversiones Angelini 

y Compan ̃ı ́a, Limitada and SierraPine, 

Civil Action No. 3:14–cv–04949. On 

November 7, 2014, the United States 

filed a Complaint alleging that 

Flakeboard, Arauco, and SierraPine 

coordinated to close SierraPine’s 

Springfield, Oregon particleboard mill 

and move the mill’s customers to 

Flakeboard before receiving federal 

antitrust approval under Section 7A of 

the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. 18a, also 

commonly known as the Hart–Scott– 

Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 

1976 (‘‘Section 7A’’ or ‘‘HSR Act’’). The 

Complaint alleges that this coordination 

constituted a per se unlawful agreement 

between competitors to reduce output 

and allocate customers in violation of 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES