alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 408 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 408

  To provide for expansion of Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2003

 Mr. Camp (for himself and Mr. Stupak) introduced the following bill; 
            which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for expansion of Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF SLEEPING BEAR DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE.

    (a) In General.--When title to the land described in subsection (b) 
has vested in the United States in fee simple, the boundary of Sleeping 
Bear Dunes National Lakeshore is revised to include such land in that 
park.
    (b) Land Described.--The land referred to in subsection (a) 
consists of approximately 104.45 acres of unimproved lands generally 
depicted on National Park Service map number 634/80078, entitled 
``Bayberry Mills, Inc. Crystal River, MI Proposed Expansion Unit to 
Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore''. The Secretary of the Interior 
shall keep such map on file and available for public inspection in the 
appropriate offices of the National Park Service.
    (c) Purchase of Lands Authorized.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary of the Interior may acquire 
        the land described in subsection (b), only by purchase from a 
        willing seller.
            (2) Budget request.--The Secretary of the Interior shall 
        include in the National Park Service budget submitted for 
        fiscal year 2004 a request for funds necessary for the 
        acquisition authorized by this subsection.
    (d) Limitation on Acquisition by Exchange or Conveyance.--The 
Secretary of the Interior may not acquire any of the land described in 
subsection (b) through any exchange or conveyance of lands that are 
within the boundary of the Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore as of 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                          DESCRIPTION OF SUBSIDIARIES

                            SUBSIDIARY CORPORATIONS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
        PARENT                         SUBSIDIARY                           INTEREST
        ------                         ----------                           --------
<S>                              <C>                                   <C>
Continental Natural Gas, Inc.    Continental Holdings Company          100%
Continental/Oklahoma Natural
   Gas Gathering, L.L.C.         Gothic Gas Corporation                100%
</TABLE>

                     SUBSIDIARY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
        PARENT                         SUBSIDIARY                           INTEREST
        ------                         ----------                           --------
<S>                              <C>                                   <C>
Continental Natural Gas, Inc.    Continental Natural Gas Gathering,    99% Ownership Interest*
                                   L.L.C.

Continental Natural Gas, Inc.    Continental Hydrocarbons, L.L.C.      99% Ownership Interest*

Continental Natural Gas, Inc.    Continental Gas Processing L.L.C.     99% Ownership Interest*

Continental Natural Gas, Inc.    Continental Laverne Gas Processing,   99% Ownership Interest*
                                   L.L.C.

Continental Natural Gas, Inc.    Continental Spearman Gas              99% Ownership Interest*
                                   Processing, L.L.C.

Continental Natural Gas, Inc.    Continental Energy Services, L.L.C.   99% Ownership Interest*

Continental Natural Gas, Inc.    Continental/Oklahoma Natural Gas      100% Ownership Interest
                                   Gathering, L.L.C.

Continental Natural Gas, Inc.    Continental/Taurus Holdings           100% Ownership Interest
                                   Company, L.L.C.

</TABLE>

                         SUBSIDIARY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
        PARENT                         SUBSIDIARY                           INTEREST
        ------                         ----------                           --------
<S>                              <C>                                   <C>
Continental/Taurus Holdings      Continental/Taurus Energy             99% Ownership Interest* Company, L.L.C.
   Company, L.P.                   (Delaware Limited Partnership) 
</TABLE>

---------------------
 *  Remaining one percent (1%) interest is held by Continental Holdings Company
**  Acquired January 1998
Except as indicated all entries are organized in Oklahoma.
10502.

#### TREMBLE, alias SHEPHERD, *v.*THE STATE.

The breaking and entering necessary to constitute burglary were not shown by the prosecutor’s testimony that some one went into his store when he was gone,'—went in through the window “where a glass 12 by 16 was broken out 4 feet from the door,” or “slipped in the store” before it was closed up; and a conviction of that offense was unauthorized.

Decided June 13, 1919.

Indictment for burglary; from Butts superior court—Judge Searcy. April 1, 1919.

*O. M. Duke,*for plaintiff in error.

*E. M. Owen,*solicitor-general, contra.

Bloodworth, J.

1. Plaintiff in error was convicted of burglary. 'In *White*v. *State,*51 *Ga.*285, the headnote is as follows: “If one enter a house with intent to commit a felony, but the entering is through an open door without any breaking, actual or constructive, the offense is not burglary; nor, under our Code, § 4386 [§ 146 of the Penal Code of 1910], is it a sufficient ‘breaking and entering into,’ that having entered with intent to commit a felony, he unbolts a door to get out.” The prosecutor in the instant case swore: “Some one went in my store when I was gone to supper; they went in through the window of my store, where a glass 12 by 16 was broken out 4 feet from the door, or he slipped in the store before I closed up and went to supper.” Applying the above-stated rule of law to the evidence just quoted, it will be readily seen that a verdict for burglary was unauthorized, and is without evidence to support it. See also *Williams*v. *State,*52 *Ga.*581; *Strickland*v. *State,*12 *Ga. App.*640 (3) (70 S. E. 1070).

*272. In view of the foregoing ruling, it is unnecessary to consider the other assignments of error.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Broyles,*P. *J., and Stephens, J., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       4,032,120
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          28,193
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            13,870,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 13,443,088
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,659,732
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,653,324
<LOANS>                                     83,038,793
<ALLOWANCE>                                    968,078
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             120,617,541
<DEPOSITS>                                 109,935,916
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,096,663
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       646,062
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,939,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             120,617,541
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,172,771
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,438,751
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             974,298
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             979,057
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,459,694
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  120,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 145
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                984,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                566,645
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     566,645
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   353,645
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.77
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,772
<LOANS-PAST>                                   489,646
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,214,173
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  380,028
<RECOVERIES>                                    13,933
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              968,078
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           968,078
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
1 Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-20813 Summary Calendar

JOSEPH CHHIM,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

THE CITY OF HOUSTON; GERARD J. TOLLETT; ROBYN WILLIAMS;

SKIP WHITE; DAVID OSTERHOUT,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(CA-H-95-4970)

January 11, 1999

Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Appellant Chhim appeals the adverse decision in his employment

discrimination suit claiming discrimination on the basis of race,

national origin and retaliation. We affirm.

Appellant was hired by the City in its Civic Center Department

in may of 1994, and was terminated in July, 1995. The stated

reason for termination was poor work performance. The decision was2

affirmed by the Civil Service Commission for Municipal Em ployees

and this suit followed.

Appella nt first claimed under Title VII and Texas law, that

his firing was in retaliation for his having filed prior EEOC

claims an d a worker’s compensation claim. Following Appellant’s

case in chief, Appellee successfully moved for directed verdict on

the basis that there was no evidence of a causal link between the

firing and the EEOC and worker’s compensation claims. Our review

of the law and the record shows no error in that determination. In

fact, the record affirmatively sh ows that the person who was

responsible for the firing had no knowledge of the prior claims.

Appellant’s claim of race and national origin discrimination

went t o the jury which returned a verdict in favor of Appellee.

The record fully supports that verdict.

AFFIRMED.
9706.

#### Penick Supply Co. *v.*Anderson *et al.*

Decided January 15, 1919.

Complaint; from city court of Madison—Judge Anderson. April 8, 1918.

*M. C. Few,*for plaintiff.

*Williford & Lambert,*for defendants.

Jenkins, J.

1. Where a provision for the payment of attorney’s fees is included in a note given by a decedent, his estate may be- made liable therfor in a sait thereon against the administrator in which such fees are claimed, after notice of the. claim has been served as is prescribed by the statute. *Harris*v. *Powers,*129 *Ga..*74 (58 S. E. 1038, 12 Ann. Cas. 475) ; *Story*v. *Wolff,*21 *Ga. App.*727 (2) (94 S. E. 899).

2. Where any or all of the heirs of a decedent whose estate has no legal representative take upon themselves the exercise of those duties which properly appertain to the office of a legal Representative only, they become liable to a creditor of the estate, as executors in their own wrong, for double the value of the property of the estate possessed or converted by them, up to the amount of the creditor’s claim. *Alfriend*v. *Daniel,*48 *Ga.*154; *Willingham*v. *Rushing,*105. *Ga.*72, 79 (31 S. E. 130).; *Bowen*v. *Groover,*77 *Ga.*126 (2-6).

3. Under the practice prevailing before the adoption of the code, an executor in his own wrong could be sued generally as executor, and judg- . ment recovered against him as such *(Shotwell*v. *Rowell,*30 *Ga.*557; *Allen*v. *Hurst,*120 *Ga.*763, 48 S. E. 341) ; but since the adoption of the code it is declared (Civil Code of 1910, § 3886) that an executor de son tort is liable as such to the. creditors and heirs-of an estate *for double the value of tlve property so possessed or converted,*and that he shall not be allowed to set off any debt voluntarily paid by him out of its assets. The nature of the suit has thus been limited to a personal action against the wrong-doer, and can not be treated as being directed against the estate itself; and while in such a suit by a creditor the claim against the decedent affords to the plaintiff his legal status, the suit is merely for double the value of the *property*illegally possessed or converted, and can not properly be brought upon the original obligation itself. ■

4. Even were it possible to construe the present action against the alleged wrongful executors as being for double the value of the personal property illegally possessed and converted, to the extent of the plaintiff’s claim under the note, it was nevertheless not error on the part of the trial judge to refuse to permit the plaintiff to .convert the action into one against the estate itself -by making, the subsequently legally appointed adininistrator a party defendant thereto; nor was it error upon the part of the judge, when sitting as both court and jury, to refuse to render judgment against the defendants for the conditional attorney’s fees provided for by the note, for the payment of which the estate had never become legally liable.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.*
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Robert Philip Tuerk, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 894 C.D. 2021

:

The Pennsylvania Department :

of Education, Bureau of School :

Leadership and Teacher Quality, :

Division of Certification Services, :

Respondent :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, May 1, 2023

, upon consideration of P etitioner’s

application for re argument

, the application is DENIED

.
Budget Narrative

Personnel

Name, Title/Role (XX hours @ $xx/hr)

Name, Title/Role (XX hours @ $xx/hr) ...

Fringe (if applicable)

The fringe rate is XX%. The fringe rate consists of health insurance, unemployment insurance, FICA, FUTA, SUTA, 

Vacation, and holidays. 

Supplies/Equipment (if applicable)

$XX for XXXX for purpose

Other Expenditures (if applicable)

Fee? 

Consultation services?

Subcontract work?

Indirect rate (if applicable)

COMPANY’s indirect rate is XX% and has been audited and approved by DCAA in FY2000.

Or, specify rate below 40%.

Travel (if applicable)

COMPANY plans X trips for reason at an estimated cost of $$XX.

Technical and Business Assistance (TABA, if applicable)

...

NOTE: THIS IS A SAMPLE. APPLICANTS NEED NOT FOLLOW 

THIS EXACT FORMAT. BUDGET NARRATIVE MAY BE IN THE 

FORM OF AN EXCEL DOCUMENT, WORD DOCUMENT, PDF, 

ETC. THE NARRATIVE IS REQUIRED IN ADDITION TO THE 

SF424A.

IF PERSONNEL IS THE ONLY APPLICABLE EXPENSE, A 

NARRATIVE IS STILL REQUIRED AND SHOULD STATE SUCH.
#### New Jersey Mutual Insurance Co. *v.*N. S. Glore.

Pawnbrokers — Levy on Pawned Property in Suit by a Creditor of Pawnbroker.

Where property held by one as pawnbroker is levied on and sold by his creditor, and he abandons his right to recover the property, he must be held to have consented to the action of the constable who levied thereon and sold the property.

Replevin — Levy on Pawned Property — Recovery by Owner.

Where pawned property is levied on and sold by a creditor of the pawnbroker, the legal owner of the property cannot recover the property from the purchaser without tendering the amount bid and paid for the property, where it is less than the amount owing by him to the pawnbroker.

APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT.

February 27, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

• According to appellee’s own showing, O’Brien, the pawnbroker, was in possession of the watch and held a lien on it (under an express contract) to secure the repayment of forty dollars loaned money when the constable levied on and sold the same by virtue of appellant’s execution against said O’Brien.

The levy was upon the watch itself, and not upon O’Brien’s equity. The watch itself was sold and purchased by appellant. The price thereof, thirty-one dollars, was entered as a credit on the execution, and to that extent the judgment against 0'’Brien was satisfied.

He has taken no steps to have the sale quashed on account of his interest in the watch not being subject to levy and sale under execution, but seemsi inclined to accept the credit resulting from the sale, and to assist appellee in his attempt to recover the full value of the watch.

As a matter of law, the fight of action for the recovery of the watch is in O’Brien, who has a special interest in the property,' and also the right of possession under his contract with Glore.

If he abandons this right to Glore, and at the same time takes *524no steps to set aside the execution sale, he must be held thereby to assent to the action of the constable. Such being the case; appellant is invested with his rights, at least to the extent that its judgment against him has been satisfied by the sale.

*Seymore■ & Abbott, for appellants.*

*Henry, for appellee.*

Glore could not have recovered in. an action against O’Brien without paying or offering to pay the loaned money. Neither can he recover against appellant’ without paying or offering to pay the amount bid for the watch at the constable’s sale, said amount being less than the debt owing by him to O’Brien.

The instructions given by the court below are wholly inconsistent with the view of the law. Its judgment must'therefore be reversed. The cause is remanded for a new trial upon principles consistent with this opinion.
TO VOTE: Use the No. 2 Pencil to connect the

Sample Ballot

Ward 3
OFFICIAL BALLOT a
GENERAL ELECTION
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
NOVEMBER 2, 2004 g>
broken arrow pointing to your choice, like this: ng
For each office, vote only for the number of candidates indicated (DO NOT USE RED INK)
ELECTORS OF ’ UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE
PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT din 2 aay eT VOTE FOR NO MORE THAN ONE
OF THE UNITED STATES connect the broken arrow pointing | Ray BROWNE cewocears mma
WOTE FOR NO MORE THAN ONE (1) to your choice, like this ADAM EIDINGER be SyaTEWOa =
JOHN F. KERRY Sacearaey
JOHN EDWARDS PEROCRATC qa wal Wrte in, Fany = om
DAVID COBB DC STATEHOOD
PATRICIA LaMARCHE sn
| DISTRICT Il
MICHAEL BADNARIK a MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF
RICHARD CAMPAGNA 7 EDUCATION
Ee VOTE FOR NO MORE THAN ONE (1)
MAR’ GARET TR OWE SOCIALIST WORKERS PARTY imme Be DWIGHT E. SIN GLETON ea »
GEORGE W. BUSH OFFICIAL BALLOT HUGH ALLEN = ot
DICK CHENEY. evenci@m "TMG] GENERAL ELECTION | TOMDAWSON =
RALPH NADER isinicneiia — ig DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | DAVID A. JORDAN =
eit ope NOVEMBER 2.2004 | LAURA McGIFFERT SLOVER = =
Write In, ifany €TM "8! TO VOTE: Use the No. 2 Pencil to | VICTOR REINOSO =o
connect the broken arrow pointing] sai ABDUL RAHMAN P|
to your choice, like this
DELEGATE TO THE : Write In, # any ~~ =
U. S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON mcg ADVISORY NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMISSIONER XXXX
MICHAEL ANDREW MONROE oe a g> VOTE FOR NO MORE THAN ONE (1)
Write In, any = = ==——ag CANDIDATE ONE = a
Write In, € any = nl
AT-LARGE
MEMBER OF THE COUNCIL For each office, vote only for the
VOTE FORINO MORE THAN THO (2) number of candidates indicated.
CAROL SCHWARTZ ct a |
LAURENT ROSS “jer Ga ma REE TSO me)
KWAME R. BROWN oe ae |
A.D. "TONY" DOMINGUEZ weerecest Gm mg | TO VOTE: Use the No. 2 Pencil to
—— connect the broken arrow pointing
Wete in, if any Soy to your choice, like this:
Write in, if any = 6g

wh

For each office, vote only for the
number of candidates indicated.

(DO NOT USE RED INK}
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

DoD.

# ACTION:

Termination of Federal Advisory Committee.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing this notice to announce that it is terminating the Department of Defense Task Force on the Care, Management, and Transition of Recovering Wounded, Ill, and Injured Members of the Armed Forces (“the Task Force”).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jim Freeman, Advisory Committee Management Officer for the Department of Defense, 703-692-5952.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This committee is being terminated in accordance with section 724 of Public Law 111-84(f) and under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5 U.S.C. Appendix), 41 CFR 102-3.55, and the Government in the Sunshine Act of 1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b), effective October 27, 2014.

Dated: November 18, 2014.

Aaron Siegel,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2014-27593 Filed 11-20-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Exhibit 4.1



(TRANSLATION)



LIABILITY LIMITATION AGREEMENT



Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. (the Company) and Masayuki Oku (the Director) hereby enter into an agreement as set forth below.



The liability of the Director for damages incurred by the Company in
performing his or her duties as an outside director under Article 423, Paragraph 1 of the Company Law shall be limited to the aggregate of the amounts specified in each item of Article 425, Paragraph 1 of the Company Law, provided that the Director
has performed such duties in good faith and without gross negligence.



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, two (2) originals of this Agreement have been executed, and each of the Company and the Director has affixed its seal hereto and retains one (1) original hereof.



June 26, 2008



|          |  |                                                                                                                                            
|--------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Company:  |  | Kunio Nakamura, Chairman of the Board (seal) Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. (corporate seal) 1006, Oaza Kadoma, Kadoma-shi, Osaka
|          | 
|Director: |  | Masayuki Oku 19-5, Hakusan 5-chome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo
(seal)