alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LA SHAUNA M. GRIFFIN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

LOS ANGELES COUNTY; FRANCISCA 

CAMPBELL, Administrative Services 

Manager III; AMERICA RODRIGUEZ, 

Administrative Services Manager II; ALEX 

MEDINA, Administrative Services Manager 

I; ALMA YOUNG, Administrative Services 

Manager I; LUISA BARRETO, Management 

Analyst; CRISTINA ROSALES, 

Administrative Services Manager I; 

KIMBERLY GREEN, Administrative 

Services Manager I; PAMELA FONTENOT, 

Administrative Services Manager II; 

YVETTE MENDOZA, Intermediate Clerk; 

ROSA MURO, Administrative Services 

Manager I, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 23-55512 

D.C. No. 8:21-cv-00981-DOC-JDE 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

FILED

FEB 28 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 23-55512 

Submitted February 21, 2024**

Before: FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

La Shauna M. Griffin appeals pro se from the district court’s order granting 

leave to amend her second amended complaint in her federal employment law 

action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s order granting Griffin

leave to amend her second amended complaint because the order is not final or

appealable. See WMX Tech., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1135-37 (9th Cir.

1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable); cf.

Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372 (9th Cir. 1993) (order) (“Rule 4(a)(2) 

permits a notice of appeal from a nonfinal decision to operate as a notice of appeal 

from the final judgment only when a district court announces a decision that would 

be appealable if immediately followed by the entry of judgment.” (citation 

omitted)).

All pending motions are denied as moot.

DISMISSED.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4115 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4115

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Act of November 2, 1966 (80 Stat. 1112), to allow binding 
 arbitration clauses to be included in all contracts affecting the land 
         within the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Reservation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BINDING ARBITRATION FOR SALT RIVER PIMA-MARICOPA INDIAN 
              RESERVATION CONTRACTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 2(c) of the Act of November 2, 1966 (25 
U.S.C. 416a(c)), is amended--
        (1) in the first sentence--
            (A) by striking ``Any lease'' and all that follows through 
        ``affecting land'' and inserting ``Any contract, including a 
        lease, affecting land''; and
            (B) by striking ``such lease or contract'' and inserting 
        ``such contract''; and
        (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``Such leases or 
    contracts entered into pursuant to such Acts'' and inserting ``Such 
    contracts''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the Indian Tribal Economic Development and 
Contract Encouragement Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-179).

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Cord Blood America, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Matthew L. Schissler, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| |     |                                                                                                                      
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                      
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of December 31, 2007, and for the period then ended.

Date: 




October 1,

 2008

| |     |                                                                                    
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By: | /s/ MATTHEW L. SCHISSLER                                                           
| |     | Matthew L. Schissler                                                               
| |     | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer



 and




Chief  Financial Officer
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 03-1841

BERNABÉ TEJADA-BATISTA,

Plaintiff, Appellee,

v.

LYDIA MORALES, Individually and in her respective official

capacity; DOMINGO ÁLVAREZ, Individually and in his respective

official capacity,

Defendants, Appellants.

__________

JOSÉ A. FUENTES-AGOSTINI, Individually and in his capacity as

Secretary of Justice of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; ERNESTO

FERNÁNDEZ, Individually and in his respective official capacity;

ANTONIO FRANCO, Individually and in his respective official

capacity; CRISTÓBAL IRIZARRY, Individually and in his respective

official capacity; JOHN DOE, 97CV1430, Individually and in his

respective official capacity; and MIGUEL GIERBOLINI,

Defendants.

ERRATA

The opinion of this court issued on September 20, 2005, should

be amended as follows:

On page 6, second full paragraph, line 3, replace "Morales's"

with "Morales'".

On page 11, line 4, replace "Fuentes's" with "Fuentes'".

On page 14, line 4, replace "Fuentes's" with "Fuentes'".

On page 14, paragraph 2, line 3, replace "was" with "were".
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 20611 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MARTIN MIRANDA

- JUAREZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:17

- CR

- 236

- 1

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Martin Miranda

Juarez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Miranda

- Juarez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 9, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-20611 Document: 00514545696 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/09/2018No. 17

- 20611

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to wi thdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-20611 Document: 00514545696 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/09/2018
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 223 (Wednesday, November 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68895-68896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27339]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as

[[Page 68896]]

amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Member Conflict: Topics in Virology.
    Date: December 3, 2014.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Marci Scidmore, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3192, MSC 7808, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-435-1149, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#55383427363c7b26363c31383a2730153b3c3d7b323a23"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c0ada1b2a3a9eeb3a3a9a4adafb2a580aea9a8eea7afb6">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 12, 2014.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-27339 Filed 11-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT31.02**

**RULE13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Michael L. Pungello,certify that:

1.               I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-Q of ML Futures Investments L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge,this  report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; and

b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and suchpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation;

c)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internalcontrols which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: August 14, 2006                         |                     |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                                          |                     |   |
| By                                            | /s/ MICHAEL L.  PUNGELLO |   |
| Michael L.  Pungello                          |
| Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer   |
| (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|                                               |                          |  |  |

 

----
#### SMITH v. JOHNSON

No. 166P97

Case below: 125 N.C.App. 603

Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 June 1997.
#### STATE v. BATES

No. 145A91-3

Case below: Yadkin County Superior Court

Petition by Attorney General for writ of supersedeas and motion for temporary stay of the judgment of the Superior Court, Yadkin County allowed 27 June 1997. Petition by Attorney General for writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Yadkin County allowed 27 June 1997.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6748

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BOBBY WAYNE DEBNAM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:17-cr-00100-BO-1)

Submitted: October 26, 2021 Decided: January 13, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jorgelina E. Araneda, ARANEDA LAW FIRM, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. 

G. Norman Acker, III, Acting United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Kristine L. Fritz, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bobby Wayne Debnam appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for 

compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We review a district court’s order 

granting or denying a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United 

States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021). We have reviewed the record and 

conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion. After waiving the exhaustion 

requirement and assuming that Debnam established extraordinary and compelling reasons 

for his release, the court denied Debnam’s motion based on the applicable 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3553(a) factors and sufficiently explained the reasons for the denial. See United States v.

High, 997 F.3d 181, 188-91 (4th Cir. 2021) (discussing amount of explanation required for 

denial of straightforward compassionate release motion). We therefore affirm the district 

court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.4 - Amendment to Partnership Agreement



Exhibit 10.4


Amendment to Partnership Agreement 

Between Sambrick Communications and 

Liaison Design Group, LLC


February 19, 2003


Payment of Money Owed Liaison Design Group by Sambrick Communications
 

	
A.
	
Beginning January 2003, Sambrick Communications agrees pay invoices owed to Liaison Design Group within 14 days of receipt of payment from SC's client. This will improve LDG's cash flow.

	 
	
B. 
	
LDG agrees to continue applying rent payments of $570.00 per month to the remaining balance (after implementation of agreement to change partnership percentages shown in paragraph C below) owed to LDG by SC. This will reduce SC's debt while aiding LDG's cash flow.

	 
	
C. 
	
The following is a breakdown of the issues discussed and agreed upon by both parties. Previously, SC owned 60% of Liaison Design Group (LDG) and Sandra Conklin owned 40%. When LDG began operation, SC's capital account totaled $24K and Sandra Conklin's capital account totaled $0.

	 
	 	
For the years 2000/2001, losses reducing the capitol account of SC were $30K. Losses reducing the capital account of Sandra Conklin were $20K.

	 
	 	
The changes to the partnership are as follows:

	 
	 	
1.
	
Set value of LDG at $60K.

	 
	 	
2.
	
Therefore, based on set value, reset capital accounts to: SC - $45.6K (this total includes the $24K initial capital investment) and Sandra Conklin $14.4K.

	 
	 	
3.
	
SC will sell 30% of its LDG shares to Sandra Conklin for $18K. Sandra Conklin will reduce SC's receivables to LDG by $18K. Sandra Conklin will then reduce the unpaid salary owed to her from LDG by $18K.

	 
	 	
4.
	
Result: SC owns 30% of LDG and Sandra Conklin owns 70% of LDG. Capital account balances change to SC - $34K; Sandra Conklin - $25.2K. 

	 
	 	
5.
	
Sandra Conklin will sell 30% of LDG to Seamus Duerr for $18K, with the agreement that he would have first right of refusal on purchasing additional shares sometime in the future.

	 
	 	
6.
	
Result: SC owns 30%, Seamus Duerr owns 30%, and Sandra Conklin owns 40%. Capital accounts become: SC - $34.8K, Duerr - $10.8K, Conklin $14.4K.





 

 







	 	
7. 
	
Seamus Duerr would become managing partner, with the same responsibilities and benefits designated for Sandra Conklin as managing/operating partner. In doing this, Sandra Conklin will not draw a salary as managing partner, but will assist Duerr as needed, on an hourly basis.

	 
	 	
This will significantly enhance the probability that LDG will show a profit.

	 
	
Repayment of Sambrick Communications Capital Account

	 
	 	
A. 
	
To assure prompt repayment of SC' s Capital Account, beginning one year from the date of this agreement, SC will receive $1.00 credit toward its past due balance for every $3.00 paid to LDG. This 3-1 ratio will reduce the past due amount owed to LDG while reducing SC's Capital Account.





These amendments have been agreed upon by:


	 	
/s/ Frank Sambrick
	 	
2/21/2003

	 	
Frank Sambrick of Sambrick Communications 
	
Date

	 
	 	
/s/ Sandra Moring Conklin
	 	
2/21/2003

	 	
Sandra Moring Conklin
	 	 	 	
Date






 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 - 2 -
Exhibit 10.5


 


Summary of
Audit Committee Chairman Compensation 

(Effective January 1, 2006)


 


The
Audit Committee Chairperson of Fieldstone Investment Corporation is paid the
following fees: 


 


	
  Annual retainer

  	
   

  	
  $40,000

  
	
  Annual retainer for Audit
  Committee Chairman

  	
   

  	
  $10,000

  
	
  Fee for each board and
  committee meeting attended in person

  	
   

  	
  $2,500 ($5,000 per meeting for the Chairman of the Board or of the
  Committee)

  
	
  Fee for each board and
  committee meeting attended telephonically

  	
   

  	
  $1,250 ($2,500 per meeting for the Chairman of the Board or of the
  Committee)

  



 


Non-employee
directors are reimbursed for their reasonable travel expenses incurred in
connection with their attendance at board meetings.
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------



|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mercari Communications Group, Ltd. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John P. Kanouff, Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| |    



|/s/ John P. KanouffJohn P. KanouffTreasurer(Principal Financial Officer)
|------------------------------------------------------------------------



|April 11, 2008
|--------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---
Specifications, Tolerances, and

Other Technical Requirements for

Weighing and Measuring Devices

as adopted by the 94th

National Conference on

Weights and Measures 2009

44

2010

NIST Handbook