alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Director Cash Compensation Arrangement



 Exhibit 10.37 
  
 RACKABLE SYSTEMS, INC. 
  
 OUTSIDE DIRECTOR CASH COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENT 
  
 FOR SERVICES AS A NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR 
  
 Each non-employee director shall receive for his or her services as a Director of Rackable Investments, Inc., (the “Company”), annual cash compensation of
$20,000 per year, payable quarterly. This amount will be increased to $35,000 for 2006. 
  
 The Chairperson of the Board of Directors of the Company shall receive for his or her services as the Chairperson of the Board of Directors, annual cash compensation of $10,000 per year, payable quarterly. 
  
 The Chairperson of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company shall receive
for his or her services as the Chairperson of the Audit Committee, annual cash compensation of $10,000 per year, payable quarterly. 
  
 The Chairperson of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company shall receive for his or her services as the Chairperson of the Compensation
Committee, annual cash compensation of $5,000 per year, payable quarterly. 
  
 The
Chairperson of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company shall receive for his or her services as the Chairperson of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, annual cash compensation of
$5,000 per year, payable quarterly. 
  
 Beginning in 2006, each non-chair
committee member of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company shall receive for his or her services as a non-chair committee member, annual cash
compensation of $2,500 per year, payable quarterly.
HMM Reference NIST Technical Note 2205: Item 3.2 Roof Assembly Details (Dormers)

Item 3.2 Roof Assembly Details (Dormers) – Flashing and ignition resistant siding to protect dormer from ignition by combustible debris 

and embers. 

Ignition resistant

siding (illustrated)

Combustible 

siding

6” tall flashing

(illustrated) No flashing

Note: Selected photographs are included to illustrate each HMM hardening item. Additional vulnerabilities or hardening items may be seen in the photographs, but those are highlighted within their specific HMM item.
There is no CAD drawing for 

Item 3.2: Assembly Details (Dormer) 

Please see photographs for illustrations.
<PAGE>   1
                                EXHIBIT 10.36

         AMENDMENT TO THE SENIOR LINE OF CREDIT AGREEMENT AND NOTES

         This is an Amendment to the Senior Line of Credit Agreement between
Aries Domestic Fund, the Aries Fund, a Cayman Islands Trust (the "Funds"), and
Xenometrix, Inc. (the "Company"), dated September 25, 1997 (the "Agreement").

         Whereas, Xenometrix is engaged in discussions with several companies
relating to licensing its patents, exclusively or non-exclusively and;

         Whereas, the Company is engaged in discussions that may lead to the
sale of the Company or all or some of the assets of the Company, and;

         Whereas, the existing line of credit, due to be retired on March 25,
1998, represents a potential impediment to the effective implementation of
these transactions;

         Now therefore, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

         The Funds agree to extend the Maturity Date of all of the Notes issued
under the Agreement to May 25, 1998. A thirty (30) day extension beyond May
25th will not be unreasonably withheld provided the Company can demonstrate
evidence of pending agreements in the area of patent licensing and/or
acquisition by [ * ] or such other parties as agreed upon by the Funds. Any
extensions beyond the first thirty (30) day extension, must be agreed to by the
Funds, "Evidence" is defined as a signed letter of intent with specific terms
which include a provision for the repayment of the Notes. The Company agrees to
pay the default interest rate of eighteen percent (18%) starting on March 25th
and continuing until the payment of the Notes. All other terms and conditions
of the Agreement as amended will continue to be in full force during the
extension period.

         In witness whereof, the Parties hereto have caused this Amendment to
be executed by their respective duly authorized representative as of the day
and year written below.

XENOMETRIX, INC.                  THE ARIES FUND, A CAYMAN
                                  ISLAND TRUST
By: /s/ Stephen J. Sullivan       By: its Investment Manager,
Name: Stephen J. Sullivan         PARAMOUNT CAPITAL ASSET
Title: President and CEO          MANAGEMENT, INC.
                                  By: /s/ Lindsay A. Rosenwald, M.D.
                                     -------------------------------
                                  Name: Lindsay A. Rosenwald, M.D.
                                  Title: President

                                  THE ARIES DOMESTIC FUND, L.P.,
                                  By: its General Partner, PARAMOUNT
                                  CAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC.
                                  By: /s/ LINDSAY A. ROSENWALD, M. D.
                                     -------------------------------
                                  Name: Lindsay A. Rosenwald, M.D.
                                  Title: President

*   CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN OMITTED
AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO
RULE 24B-2 OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Jon Michael Miranda v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00590

- CR

Trial court case number: 13CR0598

Trial court: 10th Judicial District Court of Galveston County

Appellant, acting pro se , has filed a motion requesting access to a copy of the appellate record for use in preparing a response to appointed counsel’s Anders brief, filed
on October 22, 2014. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 315, 318

– 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); s ee also Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967). However, on October 30, 2014, because we struck counsel’s motion to w ithdraw and

Anders brief as deficient, we ordered counsel to file an amended brief, motion, and cover letter within 30 days of that order , which would be by December 1, 2014

. Accordingly, w e grant the motion and order the trial court clerk, no later than 1 0 days from the date of this order, to provide a copy of the record, including the clerk’s record, the reporter’s record, and any supplemental records, to the pro se appellant. The trial court clerk shall further certify to this Court, within 15 days of t he date of this order, the date upon which delivery of the record to the appellant is made. Finally, appellant’s response to his appointed counsel’s amended brief shall be filed within 45 days of December 1, 2014, or by January 15, 2015

.
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley

 Acting individually

Date: November 25, 2014
<PAGE>   1









                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.







<PAGE>   2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in this registration
statement of TCA Cable TV, Inc. ("the Company") on Form S-8 of our report dated
January 15, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of the
Company as of October 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the three years in the period
ended October 31, 1997, which report is included in the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K.

                                             Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.






Dallas, Texas
April 29, 1998
National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE)

Community Coordinating Council

Modernize Talent Management Working Group

Project Charter: An Employer’s Guide to Writing Effective Cybersecurity 

Job Descriptions

January 10, 2023

Project Team Lead(s): Elizabeth Green, Megan Smith-Branch

1. Project Team Description

This project team focuses on Goal 3.3 of the NICE Strategic Plan: “Align qualification 

requirements according to proficiency levels to reflect the competencies and capabilities 

required to perform tasks in the NICE Framework.” In this statement, the language 

“qualification requirements” will be used in this project to mean those hiring requirements that 

are used by an employer as a way of gauging whether a candidate is viable and meets minimum 

position requirements.

2. Project Team Purpose

The team will contribute to the development of a guide for employers to aid them in developing 

effective cybersecurity job descriptions that appropriately align competencies and capabilities to 

proficiency levels. Note that NICE is in the process of developing a proficiency scale, and the 

outcome of this project will be able to leverage it.

3. Project Team Objectives

(Audience: Employers)

● Develop guidance for writing effective job descriptions utilizing good practices from 

exemplar organizations in selected industries

● Guide should provide practical, actionable steps for employers in the development of 

job descriptions to include any tools and best practice tips. How-to examples can be 

demonstrated in oral (e.g., short video) and/or written formats.

○ Considerations:

■ Addressing questions employers should ask to determine how 

qualifications will be assessed both during and after hiring.

■ Right sizing the job regarding what is required vs. preferred to reduce 

unessential requirements and open the candidate aperture.

● Guide should be flexible and extensible enough to allow for customization across 

industries and incorporation of a future NICE proficiency scale

4. Project Team Deliverables

Actionable guide for employers to use in developing effective cybersecurity job descriptions 

based on the successful practices utilized by exemplar organizations.
5. Timeline for Project Development

Deliverables due at end of March 2023

Project schedule: 

January: 

● Charter Approved

● Draft & Review Complete

● Resource Guide Drafted 

● Additional reference documents draft created

● Begin gathering case studies

February

● Final Guide Draft Ready for review

● Case studies

● Determine format for final deliverable

● Additional reference documents draft completed

March

● Final edit, formatting of Guide and Reference Documents

● Input case studies

● Additional resources completed (video, one pager etc.)

6. Draft Project Team Meeting Agenda

Project meeting via Microsoft Teams 1st and 3rd Thursday of the month 12pm ET 

[Job Descriptions Project Meeting]

[Date | Time]

[Meeting Access Information]

Roll Call

Review of Project Charter

Discussion: Actions Taken 

Since Last Meeting

Discussion: New/Ongoing 

Action Items

Next Meeting Reminder
#### Ellis *v.*Citizens' State Bank.

Opinion delivered October 29, 1928.

*192*Caraway, Baker & Qautney,*for appellant.

*O. B[. Hurst,*for appellee.

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). The court erred in directing' a verdict against appellant, as contended. The justice of the peace had rendered a judgment against the garnishee bank, directing the payment of money due from it to the drawer of the check into' the court for satisfaction of the amount due on the check. It also adjudged O. B. *193Gregg, the interpleader, was entitled, as against appellee herein, to payment of this money, which was ordered to be done.

The cashier of the garnishee bank testified that the money in satisfaction of the judgment against it as garnishee had been paid into court, upon the order of the justice, in payment of the amount the check was drawn for, and charged up to the account of Ellis, appellant.

.Appellant here did not complain of being aggrieved by the judgment of the justice 'of the peace, nor did he attempt to appeal therefrom. The justice decided, in effect, that he owed the amount of the check to the holder of it, and directed its payment by the garnishee, who did pay the money into the court in accordance with the order, and charged it against this appellant’s account.

The suit having been brought upon the check, purporting to have been executed by appellant, and the signature not having been denied under oath, the cause could have been proceeded with, whether the plaintiff appeared or not; the justice having heard it on the interplea and determined that Gregg, the interpleader, was entitled to the amount of the check, as against the plaintiff in the suit, and ordered same paid to him by the garnishee, he necessarily could not dismiss the suit for want of prosecution so as to prevent the plaintiff in such suit from taking an appeal therefrom without moving to set aside the judgment of the justice of the peace. Sections 6444, 6445, 6448, C. & M. Digest.

The circuit court did not err therefore in overruling the motion to dismiss the appeal, but erred in directing a verdict against the appellant, since no appeal bond had been given in the justice court, and the money due from appellant upon the check had been paid by the garnishee by the order of the court and charged against appellant’s account. The controversy in the circuit court was not therefore between the bank and the appellant, but between ft and the interpleader, who had won the suit in the court 'below. The court had the right *194to direct the verdict, but not against the appellant, whose liability upon the check had been discharged by payment by the garnishee of the amount to the interpleader, who was adjudged entitled to recover it.

The judgment will accordingly be reversed, and the cause as to appellant dismissed. It is so ordered.
<PAGE>   1
                                  Exhibit 24.2

                                   Consent of
                       Michener Larimore Swindle Whitaker
                     Flowers Sawyer Reynolds & Chalk, L.L.P.
                           (incorporated in Exhibit 5)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 23, 2009 

d0615 

Order 

 

June 23, 2009 

137612(31) 

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE 

INSURANCE CO., 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137612 

 COA: 284903 

Oakland CC: 2004-061786-CZ 

DAVID KERSH, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

______________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s January 27, 

2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4236 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4236

To provide for congressional disapproval of certain regulations issued 
 by the Comptroller of the Currency, in accordance with section 802 of 
                      title 5, United States Code.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2004

   Mr. Gutierrez (for himself, Mr. Paul, Mr. Sherman, Mr. Otter, Mr. 
Towns, Mr. Baca, Ms. Lee, Mrs. Maloney, Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania, Ms. 
   Carson of Indiana, Mr. Price of North Carolina, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. 
  Acevedo-Vila, Ms. Waters, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Sanders, Mr. 
 Hinchey, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Owens, Mr. Rush, Mr. Weiner, Mr. Davis of 
  Illinois, Mr. Clay, Mr. Serrano, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. 
     Moran of Virginia, Ms. Baldwin, and Mr. Bartlett of Maryland) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for congressional disapproval of certain regulations issued 
 by the Comptroller of the Currency, in accordance with section 802 of 
                      title 5, United States Code.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress 
disapproves the rule submitted by the Comptroller of the Currency 
relating to bank activities and regulations, published at 69 Fed. Reg. 
1895 (2004), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 10.5
 
  RECITALS
   ARTICLE I  CREDIT TERMS
  Term Loan
 Repayment
 Prepayment
  Interest
 Computation and Payment
 
 -1-




---



##### 



ARTICLE II  REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
           -2-




---



##### 



ARTICLE III  CONDITIONS
  Approval of Bank Counsel
 Documentation
 (i)
    
    This Agreement.(ii)
    
    The Term Note.(iii)
    
    Certificate of Incumbency.(iv)
    
    Corporate Resolution: Borrowing.(v)
    
    Such other documents as Bank may require under any other Section of this
Agreement.
 Financial Condition
 Compliance
 ARTICLE IV  AFFIRMATIVE COVENANTS
  -3-




---



##### 



-4-




---



##### 



TNW Requirement Tangible Net Worth
 Funded Debt EBITDA
 Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio
  ARTICLE V  NEGATIVE COVENANTS
  -5-




---



##### 



ARTICLE VI  EVENTS OF DEFAULT
   -6-




---



##### 



-7-




---



##### 



ARTICLE VII  MISCELLANEOUS
   BORROWER:
    
    LINDSAY MANUFACTURING CO.2707 N. 108th Street, Suite 102Omaha, NE 68154Attention: Dave DowningFax No.: (402) 829-6836BANK:
    
    WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONNebraska RCBO / MAC# N8000-01B1919 Douglas Street (1st floor)Omaha, NE 68102-1310Attention: Commercial BankingFax No.: (402) 536-2075
    -8-




---



##### 



Arbitration
 Governing Rules
 No Waiver of Provisional Remedies
 -9-




---



##### 



Arbitrator Qualifications and Powers
 Discovery
 Class Proceedings and Consolidations
 Payment Of Arbitration Costs And Fees .
 Miscellaneous
  -10-




---



##### 



LINDSAY CORPORATION f/k/a
LINDSAY MANUFACTURING CO.
    
    
    
    WELLS FARGO BANK,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONBy:
    
    /s/ David B. Downing
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Michael H. WheelerDavid B. Downing, Chief Financial
Officer
    
    
    
    
    
    Michael H. Wheeler, Relationship
Manager
 -11-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

# AGENCY:

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members of the OPM Performance Review Board.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Carmen Garcia, Employee Services—OPM Human Resources, Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street NW., Washington, DC 20415, (202) 606-4999.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 4314(c) (1) through (5) of Title 5, U.S.C., requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or more SES performance review boards. The board reviews and evaluates the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the supervisor, and considers recommendations to the appointing authority regarding the performance of the senior executive.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

Katherine Archuleta,

Director.

The following have been designated as members of the Performance Review Board of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management:

Ann Marie Habershaw, Chief of Staff

Angela Bailey, Chief Operating Officer

Dennis Coleman, Chief Financial Officer

Jonathan Foley, Director—Office of Planning and Policy Analysis

Joseph Kennedy, Associate Director for Human Resources Solutions

Mark Reinhold, Associate Director for Employee Services and Chief Human Capital Officer

Kamala Vasagam, General Counsel

Veronica Villalobos, Director—Office of Diversity and Inclusion

Andrea Bright, Deputy Associate Director for Human Resources—Executive Secretariat

[FR Doc. 2014-27950 Filed 11-24-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6325-45-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.7


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

           We consent to the inclusion in this registration statement on Form
S-1 (File No. 333-48819, Amendment No. 5) of our report dated February 3, 1997,
on our audit of the consolidated financial statements of Point Communications
Limited Partnership. We also consent to the reference to our firm under the
caption "Experts".



                                            COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Milwaukee, Wisconsin
May 22, 1998
Demonstration of a persistent current in superfluid atomic gas 

One of the most remarkable properties of macroscopic quantum systems is the phenomenon of persistent 

flow. Current in a loop of superconducting wire will flow essentially forever. In a neutral superfluid, like 

liquid helium below the lambda point, persistent flow is observed as frictionless circulation in a hollow 

toroidal container. A Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) of an atomic gas also exhibits superfluid behavior. 

While a number of experiments have confirmed superfluidity in an atomic gas BEC, persistent flow, which 

is regarded as the “gold standard” of superfluidity, had not been observed. The main reason for this is that 

persistent flow is most easily observed in a topology such as a ring or toroid, while past BEC experiments 

were primarily performed in spheroidal traps. 

Using a combination of magnetic and optical fields, we were able to create an atomic BEC in a toriodal 

trap, with the condensate filling the entire ring. Once the BEC was formed in the toroidal trap, we 

coherently transferred orbital angular momentum of light to the atoms (using a technique we had previously 

demonstrated) to get them to circulate in the trap. We observed the flow of atoms to persist for a time more 

than twenty times what was observed for the atoms confined in a spheroidal trap. The flow was observed to 

persist even when there was a large (80%) thermal fraction present in the toroidal trap. These experiments 

open the possibility of investigations of the fundamental role of flow in superfluidity and of realizing the 

atomic equivalent of superconducting circuits and devices such as SQUIDs. 

Figure 3.4: Lower left: Toroidal potential for the atoms. Lower right: time-of-flight image showing the 

donut shape characteristic of a atomic cloud with quantized rotation. Upper: the difference in persistence 

of flow when the trap is toroidal (with plug) compared to spheroidal (without plug). 

Contact: Dr. William Phillips 

(301) 975-6554 

william.phillips@nist.gov