alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Robert Robinson v. Board of Supervisors of Cheboygan County.

*Supervisors*— Certificate *of election*— Contested *office.*

The board of supervisors cannot go behind the statutory certificate of the election of a specified person as supervisor: and *mandumus*will lie to compel them to admit the person so declared elected.

A board of supervisors has no authority to determine -the right to a seat in the hoard where an election thereto is contested; the question is one for judicial cognizance.

Mandamus.

Submitted Oct. 17.

Granted Oct. 18.

*Bell <& Adams*for relator.

*J. J. Brown*and *Charles II. Brown*for respondent.

Per Curiam.

Mandamus to compel the respondent to admit the relator to a seat as supervisor of the township of Benton. The record shows that the statutory certificate of the election of relator at the annual township meeting was duly made, signed and filed by a majority of the election board, and that relator duly took and filed the oath of office. In opposition to this it was shown that at the close of the poll the votes were counted and one Gallagher, the opposing candidate to relator, was declared elected; that said Gallagher had filed oath accordingly and proceeded to act as supervisor, and been admitted by respondents to a seat on the board as duly chosen, and that the count on which relator was certified to be elected was made on.opening the boxes the day after the election.

The Court held that the relator had th *q prima faoie*right, and that when he presented himself as a member of the board, respondents had no authority to go behind the certificate and enter upon an examination of his actual election. If the election is disputed, the dispute presents a question for judicial cognizance, and the board of supervisors have no authority to try it.

Mandamus granted.
```

Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cryocon, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vaughn P. Griggs,
Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/ Vaughn P. Griggs

Vaughn P. Griggs
Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

Date May 20, 2003
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         3745670
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          195000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               7280000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   11634498
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         1858674
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           1859068
<LOANS>                                       62322768
<ALLOWANCE>                                   (795281)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                91222717
<DEPOSITS>                                    82163030
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1263254
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        612440
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                91222717
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                1652772
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               225257
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 77606
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               1955635
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              797769
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              799591
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          1156044
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    90000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  10
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 775915
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 438260
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      438260
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    271460
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 1263254
<LOANS-NON>                                     119333
<LOANS-PAST>                                    630092
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                513678
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                715230
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   144350
<RECOVERIES>                                     29401
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               795281
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            795281
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service hereby provides notice that it has filed a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to remove Return Receipt for Merchandise service from the Mail Classification Schedule's market-dominant product list.

# DATES:

*Effective date:*                         November 25, 2014.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        John F. Rosato, 202-268-8597, or                         *john.f.rosato@usps.gov*.                    

      ( print page 70230)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On November 17, 2014, the United States Postal Service® (Postal Service) filed a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to remove Return Receipt for Merchandise service from the Mail Classification Schedule's market-dominant product list, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642. Approval of this request would simplify the Postal Service's Ancillary Services product by recognizing that: (1) Return Receipt for Merchandise service has become outmoded; and (2) equivalent or improved product features can be obtained by transitioning to Signature ConfirmationTM                     service or Certified Mail® service (return receipt requested). Interested persons may comment on, or view documents pertinent to, this request at                     *http://www.prc.gov*, Docket No. MC2015-8.                

Stanley F. Mires,

Attorney, Federal Requirements.

[FR Doc. 2014-27805 Filed 11-24-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.4

                                    CONSENT

     I, Robert Monaco, hereby give my consent for EFTC Corporation ("EFTC") to
name me, in its Registration Statement on Form S-3 to be filed in May 1998 with
respect to approximately 5 million shares of EFTC's common stock, as a person
to become a director of EFTC.


Date: May 6, 1998                            /s/ ROBERT MONACO
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Robert Monaco
#### Edward McKinney *v.*Commonwealth.

Appeal — Jurisdiction.

The Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction of an appeal taken directly from the county court, in view of §§ 10, 16, 2 R. S. 407, providing for appeals to the circuit count.

APPEAL. FROM BRACKEN 'CIRCUIT COURT.

December 14, 1872.

*R. K. Smith, for appellant.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

This is a proceeding against appellant instituted in the Bracken County Court under Sec. 8, Article 1, Chapter 99, 2 R. S. 407, for a breach of his obligation as a keeper of a tavern in said county, and the court having rendered judgment disabling him from' thereafter keeping a tavern, he has appealed directly from1 the county court to this court.

The first question for consideration is, has this court jurisdiction of the case?

By Sec. 10 of the article and chapter, supra, it is provided that an appeal, or writ of error may be prosecuted by the county attorney to the circuit court, or by the defendant from' any decision of the county court under this chapter; but the sarnie, until reversed in the circuit court, shall not suspend the decision of the county court. In such cases, the circuit court shall be judge of the law and fact, and no jury shall be necessary.

And by Sec. 16, Civil Code, in cases where appeals are provided for by law from judgments and orders of quarterly, police, city and county courts to circuit courts, appeal from such judgments and orders to this court are expressly prohibited.

From' these enactments it is clear that the appeal in this case must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

-, *for appellee.*
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4176 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4176

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 122 West Elwood Avenue in Raeford, North Carolina, as the ``Bobby 
                Marshall Gentry Post Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4176

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 122 West Elwood Avenue in Raeford, North Carolina, as the ``Bobby 
                Marshall Gentry Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 122 
West Elwood Avenue in Raeford, North Carolina, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Bobby Marshall Gentry Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Bobby Marshall Gentry Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 18, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                                  CERTIFICATION





                    In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form
              10-Q/A (the "Report") of Lindsay Manufacturing Co. (the "Company")
              for the quarter ended May 31, 2003, I, Bruce C. Karsk, Chief
              Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18
              U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
              Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

                    (1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                           of 1934; and

                    (2)    the information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.

                      /s/ BRUCE C. KARSK
                      -------------------------------
                      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                      Bruce C. Karsk

                      October 10, 2003

                    A signed original of this written statement required by
              Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
              by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
              Commission or its staff upon request.





                                       25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cr−00585

Honorable Jorge L. Alonso

Jacob Mathley

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, July 22, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso as to Jacob Mathley:

Telephonic status hearing held and continued to 9/10/21 at 2:00 p.m. Members of the

public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. The call−in number is

888−808−6929 and the access code is 4911854. Counsel of record will receive an email

30 minutes prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call.

Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition

against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of

these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media

credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any

other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Notice mailed by Judge's staff In the

interest of justice and for the reasons stated on the record, time is hereby excluded to

9/10/21 pursuant to the provisions of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 USC § 3161(h)(7)(A)(B)

and 18 USC § 3161 (h)(1)(D). Notice mailed by Judge's staff (lf, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cr-00585 Document #: 46 Filed: 07/22/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:97
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-22655 and No. 333-52605 of Union Pacific Resources Group Inc. on Form S-3
and No. 333-22613 and No. 333-35641 of Union Pacific Resources Group Inc. on
Form S-8 of our report dated June 24, 1997, appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 11-K of the Union Pacific Resources Group Inc. Employees' Thrift Plan for
the year ended December 31, 1997.




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Fort Worth, Texas
June 15, 1998
# F ourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 15, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00241

- CV

WOODLAND RIDGE, Appellant

v.

Allison WALLACE

- BLODGETT,

Appellee

From the County Court At Law No. 10

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CV04742 Honorable David J. Rodrigu ez , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due to be filed by June 6 , 2022. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time has been filed. Appellant is therefore ORDERED to file, no later than June 27, 2022

, i ts brief and a written response reasonably explaining: (1) its failure to timely file a brief, and (2) wh y appellee is not significantly injured by appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. If appellant fails to timely file a brief and the written response by June 27, 2022 , we will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a); see also T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if appellant fails to comply with court order)

.

_________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and a ffixed the seal of the said
court on this 15th day of June, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 10.3


 


MAC-GRAY
CORPORATION


2005 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS


 


The
following summarizes the compensation arrangements established between Mac-Gray
Corporation (the “Company”) and its directors through verbal agreements, to be
effective retroactively as of July 1, 2005:


 


Directors who are also
employees of the Company do not receive compensation for their services on the
Board or any committee thereof. Each director who is not an employee of the
Company receives:


 


•                  an annual fee
of $20,000, paid in quarterly installments, 50% of which is paid in shares of
common stock and the balance of which, at the discretion of the director, is
paid in cash, shares of common stock or any combination thereof; and


•                  an additional
fee of $1,500 for each Board meeting attended in person and $500 per meeting
attended by teleconference.


 


Committee members receive
$1,000 per meeting of the Compensation Committee or the Governance and
Nominating Committee, and $1,250 per meeting of the Audit Committee. 
Committee members receive $250 per meeting attended by teleconference. In
addition, the Chairman of each of the Compensation Committee and the Governance
and Nominating Committee is paid $2,000 per year, and the Chairman of the Audit
Committee receives $2,500 per year.


 


Each newly elected
non-employee director receives an option to purchase 5,000 shares of common
stock on the fifth business day after his or her election to the Board, and
each non-employee director who is serving as a director on the fifth business
day after each annual meeting of stockholders automatically receives an option
to purchase 7,500 shares of common stock. All of such options granted to
non-employee directors are fully exercisable upon grant at an exercise price
equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant and
terminate upon the tenth anniversary of the date of grant. All directors are
reimbursed for significant travel expenses, if any, incurred in attending
meetings of the Board and its committees.
<PAGE>                                           Exhibit 23


                     Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
January 17, 1996 on the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
McDonnell Douglas Corporation and subsidiaries incorporated by reference
in the annual report on Form 10-K of McDonnell Douglas Corporation for
the year ended December 31, 1995 in the following filings:

-    Registration Statement File Number 33-56129 (filed October 21, 1994)
     on Form S-8, McDonnell Douglas Corporation 1994 Performance and
     Equity Incentive Plan.

-    Registration Statement File Number 33-50063 (filed August 23, 1993)
     on Form S-8, Employee Savings Plan of McDonnell Douglas Corporation
     - Salaried Plan.

-    Post Effective Amendment Number 7 to Registration Statement File
     Number 2-76396 on Form S-8, Employee Savings Plan of McDonnell
     Douglas Corporation - Component Plan, filed April 4, 1988.

-    Registration Statement File Numbers 33-40207 (filed April 29, 1991)
     and 33-50059 (filed August 23, 1993) on Form S-8, Employee Thrift
     Plan of McDonnell Douglas Corporation - Subsidiary Plan.

-    Post Effective Amendment Number 1 to Registration Statement File
     Number 33-11144 on Form S-8, Employee Thrift Plan of McDonnell
     Douglas Corporation - Hourly Plan, filed April 29, 1988.

-    Post Effective Amendment Number 2 to Registration Statement File
     Number 33-13342 on Form S-8 (which pursuant to Rule 429, also
     constitutes Post Effective Amendment Number 10 to S-8 Registration
     Statement File Number 2-64039), Incentive Award Plan, Incentive
     Compensation Plan and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, filed 
     April 28, 1989.

-    Registration Statement File Number 33-50057 (filed August 23, 1993)
     on Form S-8, Employee Investment Plan of McDonnell Douglas
     Corporation - Hourly West Plan.

-    Registration Statement File Number 33-50055 (filed August 23, 1993)
     on Form S-8, Employee Investment Plan of McDonnell Douglas
     Corporation - Hourly East Plan.

-    Registration Statement File Numbers 33-26542 (filed January 13,
     1989) and 33-50061 (filed August 23, 1993) on Form S-8, McDonnell
     Douglas Helicopter Company Savings Plan for Hourly Employees.

-    Registration Statement File Number 33-36180 on Form S-3, McDonnell
     Douglas Corporation Senior Debt Securities, filed August 1, 1990 and
     Amendment No. 1 thereto filed March 5, 1992.


                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
March 21, 1996
<PAGE>                                                 Exhibit  23



                     Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of McDonnell Douglas Corporation and subsidiaries of our report
dated January 17, 1996, included in the 1995 Annual Report to
Shareholders of McDonnell Douglas Corporation and subsidiaries.


                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
March 21, 1996