alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.

CERTIFICATION

In connection
with the periodic report of Novellus Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 27, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jeffrey C. Benzing, Executive Vice President and Chief
Administrative Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.



|                   |  |     |  |                                                                                        
|------------------ |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 5, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/  Jeffrey C. Benzing                                                                
|                   |  |     |  | Jeffrey C. Benzing                                                                     
|                   |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and
Chief Administrative Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
INTERIM STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1998. AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10QSB FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                          39,355
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  277,908
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    220,527
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               813,253
<PP&E>                                       1,858,780
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,262,292
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,579,753
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,456,438
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              402
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,471,472
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,579,753
<SALES>                                        836,497
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               836,497
<CGS>                                          569,898
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  569,898
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,073,164
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             306,287
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,109,133)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,109,133)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,109,133)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
#### Moody *v.*Burrell.

No. 6686.

February 13, 1929.

Hill, J.

Upon conflicting evidence the judge did not err in denying an interlocutory injunction and in dissolving the temporary restraining order. *Johnson*v. *Cantrell,*150 *Ga.*114 (102 S. E. 821); *Stephens*v. *Fitzgerald,*161 *Ga.*842 (131 S. E. 885); *Gray*v. *Chason,*158 *Ga.*313 (123 S. E. 290). *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*835*J. G. & H. E.*Edwards, for plaintiff.

*McMillan &*Erwin, for defendant.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha
Nutra, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Marc Urbach, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and will be retained by China
Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




August
      19, 2009Marc
      Urbach(Principal
      Executive Officer)
Exhibit 99.1



Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Mellon Financial
Corporation (the Corporation), hereby certifies that the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                     
|---------------------
|Dated: March 14, 2003
|
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1





---



##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IEA Income Fund IX, L.P. on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Dennis J. Tietz, the
President and Director of Cronos Capital Corp. (CCC) and Principal Executive
Officer of the CCC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (i)  |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and                              
| | ---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operation of the Company.
|
| |      |  | August 13, 2002                                                                                                                                    

| |                                                                                                           |                    
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------
| | By                                                                                                        | /s/ Dennis J. Tietz
| |                                                                                                          
| | Dennis J. Tietz
President and Director of Cronos Capital Corp. (CCC)
Principal Executive Officer of CCC
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4232

AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States

Jack Fields Post Office’’.Way in Kingwood, Texas, as the ‘‘CongressmanPostal Service located at 4025 Feather Lakes

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4232

AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4025 Feather Lakes Way in Kingwood,

Texas, as the ‘‘Congressman Jack Fields Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4232 EH

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 4025 Feather Lakes Way in Kingwood, Texas,

4 and known as the Kingwood Post Office, is hereby redesig5 nated as the ‘‘Congressman Jack Fields Post Office’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Congressman Jack Fields Post Office’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 6,

2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
10705.

#### Cline *v.*The State.

Decided October 14, 1919.

Indictment for manufacture of intoxicating liquor; from Cherokee superior court—Judge Morris. May 10,1919.

*John S. Wood,*for plaintiff in error.

*John T. Dorsey, solicitor-general, William, Butt,*contra.

Bloodwobth, J.

1. In the excerpts from the charge of which complaint is made we find no error.

2. The verdict is supported by some evidence, has the approval of the trial judge, and, under the law governing this court, the judgment must be

*Affirmed.*

*Broyles, O. J., and Lithe, J., concur.*
9080.

#### Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. *v.*Corry.

Wade, C. J.

This ease (22 *Ga. App.*424, 96 S. E. 335) was carried by writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court, and that court made the following rulings:

“A railway company over whose road a passenger-train, including a sleeping-car, is operated is liable for damages which are the proximate results of negligence on the part of the employees in charge of the sleeping-car in failing to notify a passenger occupant thereof of the train’s arrival at his destination. This is ti’ue though the company may not own the sleeping-car or the train, since those having them in charge become its agents and employees as to duties due such passenger, while the train is being operated over its road. Where the passenger in the sleeping-car had no notice of the train’s arrival at his destination, he being ignorant of this fact by reason of the darkness of the night, and the train, together with the sleeping-car occupied by him, at that place, in accordance with its regular course and schedule, but without his knowledge, switched from the line of road over which he held passage onto the line of road of another and different company, and after being transported for some twenty miles over its road he *169was required by its conductor and the conductor of the sleeping-car to leave the train during the night, iñ freezing weather, at a small station where he was unable to secure accommodation, by reason whereof he contracted an illness which caused him much physical pain and mental anguish, *held: (a)*The company over whose line he held passage and traveled to his destination was not liable in damages for his illness, for the reason that it was not the proximate result of such company’s negligence in failing to notify him of arrival at his destination. (6) There were no aggravating circumstances in failing to give notice of arrival at the destination, so as to authorize a recovery of exemplary or punitive damages, (c) Nor were damages for loss of time and expense incurred by reason of being carried, without notice, beyond the destination recoverable, when not specially sued for, nor the amounts claimed therefor specially set forth, *(d)*The petition set forth cause for recovery of nominal damages.” Eor full opinion of the Supreme Court see 149 *Ga.*295 (99 S. E. 881).

Decided August 13, 1919.

Action for damages; from city court of Tifton—Judge Price. July 16, 1917.

J. *B. Hall, Guyton Parles, 0. J. Bloch, B. D. Smith,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. S. Bídgdill, B. G. Williford,*contra.

Under the latter ruling the petition set forth faets which authorized a recovery of only nominal damages on account of the alleged negligence of the defendant company in failing to notify the plaintiff of the approach of the train to his destination; and the ruling of this court on this question having been reversed in so far as it relates to damages other than nominal, the judgment originally entered by the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court.

*Judgment affirmed in part, and reversed, in part.*

*Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.*
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of China Broadband, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yue Pu, Principal
      Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Broadband, Inc. and will be retained by China Broadband, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




August
                19, 2008
            
            */s/ Yue
                Pu*Yue
                Pu*(Vice
                Chairman Principal*
              *Accounting
                Officer)*
Order entered October 19, 2012

In The

No. 05-12-00573-CV

CKH FAM~Y LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL., Appellants

V.

MGD/CCP ACQUISTION, LLC, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-I 1-00382-D

ORDER

The Court has before it appellees’ October 18, 2012 unopposed second motion for

extension of time to file their brief. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS appellees to

file their brief by November 6, 2012. No further extensions will be granted absent a showing of

exceptional circumstances.

MOLLY

JUSTICE
10681.

#### Whatley *v.*Cohen *&*Company *et al.*

Decided November 26, 1919.

Action for damages; from Kichmond superior court—Judge Henry C. Hammond. June 3, 1919.

*1. S. Peebles Jr., T. 8. Harrison,*for plaintiff.

*C.*H„ *& B. 8. Cohen.. Pierce Brothers,*for defendants.

Jenkins, P. J.

1. The transfer of this ease to this court by the Supreme Court is equivalent to a holding that the suit is one at law.

2. “Distinct and separate claims of or against different persons can not be joined in the same action.” Civil Code (1910), § 5515; *Van Dyke,*v. *Van Dyke,*120 *Ga.*984 (48 S. E. 380). Thus, when properly demurred to, a suit for damages can not be maintained where the suit in one count proceeds against the owner of property for his failure to comply with a contract of lease as. executed in his behalf by his duly authorized agent, and where in another count it is attempted to proceed against the agent on the theory that he was without authority in the execution of such contract on behalf of his principal; since such a suit is an attempt to join distinct and separate alleged causes against different persons in one and the same action. This is true without reference to the question as to whether or not the alleged cause of action against the agent is maintainable.

3. “Breach of contract gives a right of action whether special damages be alleged or not, and therefore excluding from the declaration all averments of special damages, will not warrant the court in dismissing the action.” *Kenny*v. *Collier,*79 *Ga.*743 (8 S. E. 58).

4. The defendants entered general demurrers, and set up that the petition was multifarious, that it contained a misjoinder of parties, and that the special injury sued for was not the proper measure of damages to be applied in such a case. The demurrers were sustained in general terms, to which ruling plaintiff excepts. The plaintiff in error has requested this court to give him leave to amend his petition in the event it should be held that in the petition as brought there was a misjoinder of parties. This request is granted, and it is directed that the plaintiff be allowed to amend the petition in respect to the defects above indicated before the judgment of this court is made the j)udgment of the court below. Civil Code (1910), § 6205; *Central Railroad Co.*v. *Paterson,*87 *Ga.*646 (13 S. E. 525); *Georgia Railroad &c. Co.,*v. *Tice,*124 *Ga.*459 (52 S. E. 916, 4 Ann. Cas. 400); Civil Code, § 5688; *Brown*v. *Bowman,*119 *Ga.*153 (46 S. E. 410); *Lippincott*v. *Behre,*122 *Ga.*543 (50 S. E. 467); *Green*v. *Massee & Felton Lumber Co.,*6 *Ga. App.*389 (65 S. E. 44).

*Judgment affirmed, with direction.*

*Stephens and Smith, JJ., coneur.*
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131683 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan MICHAEL LYONS, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131683 COA: 269276 WCAC: 05-000106 WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 9, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Income Partners 1988-A, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         1,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  215,373
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               216,373
<PP&E>                                         10,172,851
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,430,075)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,968,512
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          230,030
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,702,666
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,968,512
<SALES>                                        225,095
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               226,127
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  137,415<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                63,864
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            63,864
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   63,864
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Assembly of Energy Nanomaterials via Water Based Assembly

Paula T. Hammond

Department of Chemical Engineering

MIT

Cambridge, MA 02139

The electrostatic assembly method enables the construction of devices with a high degree of control of ion 

and electron transport, and the incorporation of inorganic and organic nanomaterials. This capability 

allows the generation of a broad range of reactive membranes and electrochemical devices through the 

use of simple aqueous processing conditions, such as salt content and solution pH, to act as tools for the 

manipulation of ion and electron transport characteristics in the film, as well as the morphology of these 

unique nano-assemblies. Ultimately, the use of layer-by-layer systems has led to a range of organic and 

inorganic materials systems that have incorporated metal oxide nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, and 

organic and inorganic polymers to yield systems of interest for solar cells, fuel cells, capacitor/battery and 

electrochemical energy electrode applications. We have recently introduced an automated misting 

approach to multilayer assembly, spray-LbL, that enables the coating of complex surfaces and porous 

substrates, and greatly reduces time to assembly for multilayer devices. This approach has enabled the 

generation of asymmetric reactive membranes, high surface area devices, and rapidly assembled 

electrodes.
10821.

#### Farmers State Bank *v.*Singletary, survivor.

Decided December 9, 1919.

Complaint; from Early superior court—Judge Worrill. July 26, 1919.

Application for certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court.

*Park & Stone,*for plaintiff in error.

*Pottle & Hof mayor,*contra.

Beoyx.es, C. J.

In this case substantial justice seems to have been done; the verdict was authorized by the evidence; no reversible error of law appears to have been committed upon the trial; and for no reason assigned in any of the grounds of the motion for a new trial did the court err in overruling the motion.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0251

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ROBERT RONALD BRADY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 26, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 3 2024

07/03/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0251