alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING )

COMMISSION, )

)

Plaintiff, ) Case No. 20-cv-03758

)

v. ) Judge: Hon. Thomas M. Durkin

)

LONG LEAF TRADING GROUP, INC., )

JAMES A. DONELSON, TIMOTHY )

M. EVANS, JEREMY S. RUTH, and )

ANDREW D. NELSON, )

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF FILING

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Tuesday, September 29, 2020, Defendant 

filed his Motion to File Corrected Answer, a copy of which was previously served upon 

you, with the Clerk of the Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.

Nicholas P. Iavarone 

The Iavarone Law Firm, P.C. 

2516 Waukegan Road, #399

Glenview, Illinois 60025

(312) 637-9466

(800) 417-0580 (fax) 

niavarome@iavaronefirm.com

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 27 Filed: 09/29/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:219
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Nicholas P. Iavarone, an attorney admitted to practice law in the State of Illinois, declares 

that on September 29, 2020 he caused a copy of the attached Notice of Filing to be served via 

email to:

(aburden@cftc.gov)

Ashley J. Burden

Senior Trial Attorney/Chicago Regional Office

Division of Enforcement

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

312-596-0693

Nicholas P. Iavarone 

The Iavarone Law Firm, P.C. 

2516 Waukegan Road, #399

Glenview, Illinois 60025

(312) 637-9466

(800) 417-0580 (fax) 

niavarome@iavaronefirm.com

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 27 Filed: 09/29/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:220
EXHIBIT 10.23.1



 




Exhibit 10.23.1



[CASTLE BRANDS LOGO]




October 17, 2005




Mr. David Phelan

Executive Vice President, Castle Brands Inc.

Managing Director, Castle Brands Spirits Group Limited

Victoria House

Haddington Road

Dublin 4

Ireland




Dear Dave,




     Reference is made to the two letter agreements, dated August 4, 2005, among yourself, Castle
Brands Inc. and Castle Brands Spirits Group Limited, establishing your consultancy with the
companies. As discussed, this letter will confirm our agreement pursuant to which the terms of the
aforesaid letter agreements are amended by changing the date October 1, 2005 to December 1, 2005
and changing the date March 31, 2006 to May 31, 2007.



     If the foregoing properly reflects our agreement, please execute a copy of this letter and
return it to me whereupon this letter will become an effective amendment to the aforesaid letter
agreements.



Very best regards,




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Castle Brands Inc.	 	Castle Brands Spirits Group Limited
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Keith A. Bellinger
	 	By:
	 	/s/ Keith A. Bellinger
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	Name:

	 	Keith A. Bellinger
	 	Name:
	 	Keith A. Bellinger
	Title:

	 	Chief Operating Officer
	 	Title:
	 	Director
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Accepted and agreed	 	 	 	 
	as of the date first written above:	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ David Phelan	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	David Phelan	 	 	 	 






570 Lexington Avenue, 29th Floor, New York, New York 10022

Voice (646) 356-0200/Fax (646) 356-0222

www.castlebrandsinc.com
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50683

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARIO REYES-GURROLA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:03-CR-1894-ALL-KC

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Mario ReyesGurrola raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a

prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 7

[PRIVILEGED INFORMATION ONLY REDACTED]

Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 32-10 Filed: 12/10/20 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:345
Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 32-10 Filed: 12/10/20 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:346
Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 32-10 Filed: 12/10/20 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:347
Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 32-10 Filed: 12/10/20 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:348
Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 32-10 Filed: 12/10/20 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:349
Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 32-10 Filed: 12/10/20 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:350
----

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE **

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002 **

**STUDIO      ONE MEDIA, INC. **

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                          |                                                    |                                                      |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                          | **STUDIO                ONE MEDIA, INC.**               |
|                                                     |                                               |                                                 |
| Date:                 *November                14, 2006* | By:                                           | /s/                 *Preston                J. Shea* |
|                                                          | *Preston                J. Shea*                        |
|                                                          | *President                and Chief Accounting Officer* |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6715

MICHAEL MCNEAL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HONORABLE TIMOTHY R. DOORY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. 

(1:13-cv-00923-JKB)

Submitted: July 25, 2013 Decided: July 30, 2013

Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael McNeal, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael McNeal appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006), and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) 

motion. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised 

in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because 

McNeal’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the 

district court’s disposition, McNeal has forfeited appellate 

review of the court’s orders. Accordingly, we affirm the 

district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     9

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          18,010
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             356
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    516,011
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           8,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        617,486
<ALLOWANCE>                                     (6,772)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,203,415
<DEPOSITS>                                     901,678
<SHORT-TERM>                                    69,376
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,276
<LONG-TERM>                                    133,653
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,561
<OTHER-SE>                                      87,871
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,203,415
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 33,387
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               24,234
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   246
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                57,867
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              24,505
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,968
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           25,899
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,522
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 14,192
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,234
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      15,234
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,728
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.11
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.78
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,158
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,876
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      153
<RECOVERIES>                                        49
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,772
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>
10167.

#### Puckett *v.*Georgia Railway & Power Company.

Decided May 14, 1919.

Rehearing denied June 9, 1919.

Action for damages; from Fulton superior court—Judge Ellis. September *25,*1918.

*Loving & Poole,*for plaintiff.

*Colquitt & Conyers,*for defendant.

Broyles, P. J.

1. Under the pleadings and the evidence, the court did not'err in directing a verdict for the defendant, or in refusing to grant a new trial.

2. Even if the rejection of testimony as complained of in’ the motion for a new trial was error, it does not, under all the facts of the case, require a reversal of the judgment below.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.*
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 607

Providing for a revised edition of the Rules and Manual of the House

of Representatives for the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 20, 1998

Pursuant to H. Res. 594; considered as having been adopted

RESOLUTION

Providing for a revised edition of the Rules and Manual

of the House of Representatives for the One Hundred

Sixth Congress.

1 Resolved, That a revised edition of the Rules and

2 Manual of the House of Representatives for the One Hun3 dred Sixth Congress be printed as a House document, and

4 that three thousand additional copies shall be printed and

5 bound for the use of the House of Representatives, of

6 which nine hundred copies shall be bound in leather with

7 thumb index and delivered as may be directed by the Par8 liamentarian of the House.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### United States Mint

# AGENCY:

United States Mint, Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The United States Mint is announcing a price of $57.95 for the 2014 Coin and Chronicles Set—Franklin D. Roosevelt.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marc Landry, Acting Associate Director for Sales and Marketing; United States Mint; 801 Ninth Street NW., Washington, DC 20220; or call 202-354-7500.

Authority: 31 U.S.C. 5112.

Dated: November 14, 2014.

Richard A. Peterson,

Deputy Director, United States Mint.

[FR Doc. 2014-27650 Filed 11-20-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7587

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SONIA LATRESE CURBELO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Wilmington. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (7:19-cr-00100-D-3)

Submitted: April 14, 2022 Decided: April 18, 2022

Before DIAZ and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sonia Latrese Curbelo, Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States 

Attorney, Lucy Partain Brown, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Sonia Latrese Curbelo appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for 

compassionate release, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First 

Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. United States v. Curbelo, No. 7:19-cr-00100-D-3 (E.D.N.C. 

Nov. 5, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1





                                                                       EXHIBIT 5


                                  May 15, 1998

MultiMedia Access Corporation
2665 Villa Creek Drive
Suite 200
Dallas, TX  75234

       Re:  MultiMedia Access Corporation - Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Dear Sirs:

         With reference to the registration statement on Form S-8 (the
"Registration Statement") which MultiMedia Access Corporation (the "Company")
proposes to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, registering  250,000 shares of Common Stock
(par value $0.0001 per share) of the Company ("the "Shares") which are to be
offered pursuant to the MultiMedia Access Corporation Employee Stock Purchase
Plan (the "Plan"), we are of the opinion that:

(1)      the Company is a Corporation duly organized and validly existing under
the laws of the State of Delaware.

(2)      All proper corporate proceedings have been taken so that the Shares
have been duly authorized and, upon issuance and payment therefore in
accordance with the Plan and the offering and sale of Shares thereunder, will
be legally issued, fully paid and non-assessable.

         We have examined originals, or copies, certified or otherwise
identified to our satisfaction, of such documents, corporate records,
certificates of public officials and other instruments as we have deemed
necessary or advisable for the purpose of rendering this opinion.  We have
assumed the authenticity of all documents submitted as originals and the
conformity with the original documents of any copies of such documents
submitted for examination.

         We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement.

                               Very truly yours,

                               /s/ John S. Stoppelman
                               -----------------------------------
                               John S. Stoppelman
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6864

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LUCIEN ANTONIO ROBERTS, a/k/a Lou, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CR-99-21-4) Submitted: July 14, 2004 Decided: July 28, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lucien Antonio Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Lucien Antonio Roberts seeks to appeal the district court’s denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reconsider judgment. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 225 3(c)(1) (2000). The denial of a Rule 60(b) motion is the final order in a habeas proceeding and thus requires a certificate of appealability for appeal. Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 367-69 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Roberts has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.- 3 - DISMISSED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

LUIS ALVAREZ, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1670

)

MARK DAVID HAWKINS, and )

GEORGE STUART QUAY, IV, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed April 24, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas 

County; Thomas H. Minkoff, Judge.

Luis Alvarez, pro se.

Ezequiel Lugo of Banker Lopez Gassler 

P.A., Tampa, for Appellee Mark David 

Hawkins.

No appearance for remaining Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, KHOUZAM, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          64,051
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,987,267
<ALLOWANCES>                                   224,632
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,752,450
<PP&E>                                         974,393
<DEPRECIATION>                                 735,630
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,096,324
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,172,297
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       318,068
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,096,324
<SALES>                                      5,108,881
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,108,881
<CGS>                                        4,177,123
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,177,123
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               525,384
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,299
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                375,127
<INCOME-TAX>                                    95,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            279,327
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   279,327
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Sarah L. Stewart,

Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2014-28092 Filed 11-24-14; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-P