alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

UFCW LOCAL 1500 WELFARE FUND, on 

behalf of itself and all those similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS IRELAND 

LIMITED, JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., 

ROXANE LABORATORIES, INC., HIKMA 

PHARMACEUTICALS PLC, EUROHEALTH 

(USA), INC., and WEST-WARD 

PHARMACEUTICALS CORP., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 1:20-cv-03852

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff UFCW 

Local 1500 Welfare Fund, by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby gives notice that it 

voluntarily dismisses its claims against all Defendants in the above-captioned actions without 

prejudice and without costs to any party. None of the adverse parties has served an answer or a 

motion for summary judgment. 

Dated: July 14, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Gregory S. Asciolla 

Gregory S. Asciolla 

Karin E. Garvey 

Robin A. van der Meulen 

Domenico Minerva 

Matthew J. Perez 

Veronica Bosco 

LABATON SUCHAROW LLP 

140 Broadway 

New York, NY 10005 

Tel: (212) 907-0700 

Fax: (212) 818-0477 

Case: 1:20-cv-03852 Document #: 14 Filed: 07/14/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:109
gasciolla@labaton.com

kgarvey@labaton.com

rvandermeulen@labaton.com 

dminerva@labaton.com

mperez@labaton.com

vbosco@labaton.com 

Michael J. Freed 

Robert J. Wozniak 

Brian Hogan 

FREED KANNER LONDON & MILLEN LLC 

2201 Waukegan Rd, Suite 130 

Bannockburn, IL 60015 

Tel: (224) 632-4500 

Fax: (224) 632-4521 

mfreed@fklmlaw.com 

rwozniak@fklmlaw.com 

bhogan@fklmlaw.com

Roberta D. Liebenberg 

Paul Costa 

Mary L. Russell 

FINE, KAPLAN AND BLACK, R.P.C. 

One South Broad Street, 23rd Floor 

Philadelphia, PA 19107 

Tel: (215) 567-6565 

Fax: (215) 568-5872 

rliebenberg@finekaplan.com 

pcosta@finekaplan.com 

mrussell@finekaplan.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Classes 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-03852 Document #: 14 Filed: 07/14/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:110
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on July 14, 2020, I caused the foregoing Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal to be electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which 

will send notification of such filing to the email addresses denoted on the Electronic Mail Notice 

List. 

/s/ Gregory S. Asciolla 

 Gregory S. Asciolla 

Case: 1:20-cv-03852 Document #: 14 Filed: 07/14/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:111
March 2005 

USDA Clarifies MAVs 

By Kathy Dresser 

In the August 2004 issue of this newsletter an article was published that advised weights 

and measures officials to apply the USDA lower limits in Table 2-9, “USDA Meat and 

Poultry Groups and Lower Limits for Individual Packages,” to meat and poultry products 

that bear a USDA seal. 

After the August article was published, some states questioned the accuracy of that 

information based on their interpretation of USDA regulations. To resolve those 

concerns NIST asked the USDA if the guidance included in Handbook 133 regarding the 

use of the USDA lower limits in Table 2-9 was consistent with USDA regulations. The 

USDA responded that NIST Handbook 133 is correct in advising officials to apply Table 

2-9 to all meat and poultry products that bear a USDA seal. Based on this information 

NIST encourages all jurisdictions to adhere to the following guidance from the USDA 

regarding the application of Table 2-9 to meat and poultry products: 

• If the package bears a USDA seal, apply the USDA lower limits in 

Handbook 133 Table 2-9. 

• If the package does not bear a USDA seal, apply the regular MAVs in 

Handbook 133 Tables 2-5 and 2-6, as appropriate. 

For more than 10 years NIST has worked with the NCWM and the USDA to facilitate the 

uniform application of USDA requirements by state and local weights and measures 

officials to meat and poultry products that fall under USDA jurisdiction. USDA 

regulations preempt state and local requirements in the area of net contents, and therefore 

state and local weights and measures officials should follow USDA guidance when 

inspecting products that fall under USDA jurisdiction. 

Table 2-9 was adopted by the NCWM and incorporated into NIST Handbook 133 to 

provide state and local officials with the correct standard to apply to meat and poultry 

products subject to USDA jurisdiction. Handbook 133 instructs inspectors to apply Table 

2-9 to all meat and poultry packages that bear a USDA seal. According the USDA Food 

Safety and Inspection Service, products that bear a USDA seal, regardless of other factors 

that may intervene, fall under USDA jurisdiction and should have the USDA lower limits 

applied to them. 

For further information on NIST Handbook 133 contact Kathy Dresser at 301-975-

3289 or by email at kathryn.dresser@nist.gov. 
For further information on USDA regulations related to net quantity labeling contact the 

USDA, FSIS, OPPED; Labeling and Consumer Protection Staff by phone at 202-205-

0279, by fax at 202-205-3625, or by email at fsis.labeling@fsis.usda.gov.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000836809
<NAME> DIMENSIONAL VISIONS INCORPORATED
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          21,897
<SECURITIES>                                   398,091
<RECEIVABLES>                                  398,091
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (215,743)
<INVENTORY>                                    158,740
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               371,486
<PP&E>                                         358,065
<DEPRECIATION>                                 293,927
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 741,333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          653,810
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    922,178
<COMMON>                                         2,910
<OTHER-SE>                                   (837,565)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   741,333
<SALES>                                        172,251
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               172,251
<CGS>                                          164,843
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  164,843
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               529,348
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,590
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,050)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (47,050)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha
      Nutra, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended September
      30,
      2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Report"), I, Marc Urbach, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and will be retained by China
      Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




August
                19, 2008
            By:
            */s/ Marc Urbach*Name: Marc Urbach
              Title:  President (Principal Executive Officer)
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 73

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Rules in the One

Hundred Fifth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 13, 1997

Mr. SOLOMON (for himself and Mr. MOAKLEY) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Oversight

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on

Rules in the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Rules (herein4 after in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Committee’’),

5 including the expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be

6 paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House of Rep7 resentatives for committee salaries and expenses, not more

8 than $4,649,102 for the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

9 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

10 Of the amount specified in section 1—
2

HRES 73 IH

1 (1) not more than $2,306,407 shall be available

2 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

3 noon on January 3, 1997, and ending immediately

4 before noon on January 3, 1998; and

5 (2) not more than $2,342,695 shall be available

6 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

7 noon on January 3, 1998, and ending immediately

8 before noon on January 3, 1999.

9 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

10 Payments under this resolution shall be made on

11 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

12 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner

13 directed by the Committee on House Oversight.

14 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

15 Amounts made available under this resolution shall

16 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by

17 the Committee on House Oversight.

Æ
#### L. Bonner, etc., *v.*J. C. Johnson's Trustees.

Landlord and Tenant — Tenancy From Year to Year — Tenancy at Will— Payment of Rent — Evidence.

The fact that rent is payable by the month is not itself sufficient to show that there was an agreement, either express or implied, that appellants were to hold the leased premises at will.

APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.

December 4, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

Testing the question by the rule laid down' by both Kent and Taylor (4th Vol. Kent Com. 112; Taylor, Landlord and Tenant, Sec. 59), it seems to us perfectly manifest that the tenancy in this case was a tenancy from year to year. The fact that the rent was payable by the month is not itself sufficient to show that there was an agreement, either express or implied, that appellants were to hold the leased premises as tenants at will.

*14*Hagan- & Du-pey, for appellants.*

*Pirtle & Caruth, for appellees.*

This being the sole question submitted to us for adjudication the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas, must be affirmed.
----

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |                        |                                |
|------------------------------------|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|                               | STUDIO      ONE MEDIA, INC. |
|                               |                        |                                |
| Date:  May      19, 2009 | By:               | /s/       Preston J.      Shea |
|                               | Preston      J. Shea        |
|                               | President                   |

|                               |                                                     |                                    |
|------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                               | STUDIO      ONE MEDIA, INC.                              |
|                               |                                                     |                                    |
| Date:  May      19, 2009 | By:                                            | /s/       Kenneth R.      Pinckard |
|                               | Kenneth      R. Pinckard                                 |
|                               | Chief      Financial Officer and Chief AccountingOfficer |

----
10942.

#### Johnson *v.*The State.

Decided December 9, 1919.

Indictment for larceny; from Cobb superior court—Judge Morris. September 13, 1919.

*Charles M. Brown, W. E. Roberts, Clay & Giles,*for plaintiff in error.

*John T. Dorsey, solicitor-general, William Butt,*contra.

Luke, J.

This ease is here upon the sole assignment of error that the verdict is contrary to the evidence. The ease is very weak, but there is some evidence to support the verdict. Where • a verdiet with some evidence to support it meets with the approval of the trial judge, and no error-of law is shown, this court can not set the verdict aside.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE
NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-24-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-26-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-24-2000
<CASH>                                           3,512
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   88,450
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,131
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                93,158
<PP&E>                                          19,119
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,809
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 139,292
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,857
<BONDS>                                         50,754
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           378
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,842
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   139,292
<SALES>                                        138,874
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               138,874
<CGS>                                          123,116
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  123,116
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,005
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,860
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,893
<INCOME-TAX>                                       372
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,521
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,521
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>THE COMPANY'S EQUITY IS NOT PUBLICLY TRADED.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
KOGER EQUITY DOES NOT FILE A CLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET, THEREFORE THESE NOT
PROVIDED. 5-02 (9), 5-02 (21)
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          41,849
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,929
<ALLOWANCES>                                       247
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         615,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                  87,605
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 586,812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        202,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           236
<OTHER-SE>                                     369,774
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   586,812
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,943
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,448
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,589
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    37
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,159
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,710
<INCOME-TAX>                                        17
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,693
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,693
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4163 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4163

  To provide for a greater number of members on certain combined Farm 
                   Service Agency county committees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 2004

Mr. Shuster (for himself and Mr. Holden) introduced the following bill; 
           which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for a greater number of members on certain combined Farm 
                   Service Agency county committees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASED MEMBERSHIP OF CERTAIN COMBINED FARM SERVICE AGENCY 
              COUNTY COMMITTEES.

    Section 8(b)(5)(B) of the Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment 
Act (16 U.S.C. 590h(b)(5)(B)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
                            ``(vi) Membership of combined farm service 
                        agency county committees.--Notwithstanding the 
                        numerical limitations of clause (ii), a county 
                        committee that results from the combination or 
                        consolidation of county, area, or local 
                        committees representing 3 or more counties 
                        shall consist of not fewer than 3 nor more than 
                        the applicable number of members who meet the 
                        requirements of clause (ii). For purposes of 
                        the preceding sentence, the applicable number 
                        is the sum of 1 and twice the number of 
                        counties represented by the members of the 
                        committee.''.
                                 <all>
```
WEE ISI AR DFALE YW I
PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PETITION / ADVISORY VOTE N° 3 8

COUNTY, IDAHO
GENERAL ELECTION — NOVEMBER 3, 1998

PRECINCT NAME

OFFICIAL BALLOT

PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PETITION / ADVISORY VOTE

COUNTY, IDAHO
GENERAL ELECTION — NOVEMBER 3, 1998

INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTERS: To voie on the following, mark a cross (X) in the square at the right of “YES” or “NO.”

PROPOSITION ONE

INITIATIVE ALLOWING CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES TO SIGN
TERM LIMITS PLEDGE; INFORMS VOTERS ON THE BALLOT IF
CANDIDATE SIGNS OR BREAKS PLEDGE.

ADVISORY VOTE
House Bill No. 644

ADVISORY QUESTION ASKING WHETHER BALLOT ACCESS
RESTRICTIONS SHOULD CONTINUE FOR OTHER OFFICES SINCE

INITIATIVE ENACTING NEW IDAHO CODE SECTION 34-907B: THEY ARE INAPPLICABLE TO MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.

AUTHORIZES SECRETARY OF STATE TO ACCEPT SIGNED
TERM LIMITS PLEDGE FROM CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES ;
SPECIFYING LANGUAGE OF TERM LIMITS PLEDGE; REQUIR-
ING SECRETARY OF STATE TO PLACE TERM LIMITS PLEDGE
INFORMATION ON BALLOTS; REQUIRING SECRETARY OF
STATE TO PLACE TERM LIMITS PLEDGE INFORMATION IN
POLLING PLACES; DEFINING CONGRESSIONAL TERMS OF
OFFICE; CONFERRING STANDING UPON INITIATIVE SPON-
SORS; AUTHORIZING SECRETARY OF STATE TO PROMUL-
GATE RULES; AND CONTAINING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.

Shall the above-entitled measure
proposed by Proposition One be
approved?

ves |_|
xo L_]

ADVISORY QUESTION PROMULGATED BY THE IDAHO LEGIS-
LATURE STATING THAT THE UNITED STATES SUPREME
COURT HAS INVALIDATED BALLOT ACCESS RESTRICTIONS
AS THEY APPLY TO MEMBERS OF CONGRESS; ASKING
WHETHER BALLOT ACCESS RESTRICTIONS SHOULD REMAIN
IN PLACE FOR STATE ELECTED OFFICIALS, STATE LEGIS-
LATORS, COUNTY ELECTED OFFICIALS, CITY ELECTED OFF-
ICIALS AND SCHOOL DISTRICT TRUSTEES DESPITE THE FACT
THAT THE SAME BALLOT ACCESS RESTRICTIONS CANNOT
APPLY TO MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.

Since the United States Supreme Court has ruled that YES []
Idaho’s 1994 term limits law does not apply to members
of Congress, shall term limits for state elected officials,

state legislators, county elected officials, city elected NO [|
officials and school district trustees remain in place?
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of this Registration Statement on Form S-3 of Newmont Gold
Company of our report dated February 1, 1997, except for the fifth paragraph of
Note 1, which is as of March 10, 1997, pertaining to the consolidated financial
statements of Santa Fe Pacific Gold Corporation and Subsidiaries which appears
on page 39 of Newmont Gold Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1997. It should be noted, however, that such financial
statements are not included in such Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent
to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Prospectus.


                                         /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
July 13, 1998