alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-80537) pertaining to the Dave & Buster's, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan
of our report dated March 30, 1998 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Dave & Buster's, Inc. incorporated by reference in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended February 1, 1998.



                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Dallas, Texas
May 1, 1998
Exhibit
31.1




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


Rule
13a–14(a)/15d–14(a) Certification




I,
Frederick C. Goerner, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify
that:





1.           I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
February 29, 2008 of Patriot Scientific Corporation;





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4.           The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





(c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.           The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:
April 9, 2008






/s/
      Frederick C.
      GoernerFrederick C.
      GoernerChief Executive
      Officer
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ABC CORPORATION I, ABC CORPORATION II, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees

EBAY, INC., 

Plaintiff

v.

THE PARTNERSHIP AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE 

"A", TOMOLOO OFFICIAL, TOMOLOO INE, 

TOMOLOO FRANCHISE, TOMOLOO-US, 

TOMOLOO FLAGSHIP, TOMOLOO TC, 

TOMOLOO DX, TOMOLOO INT, CARTSTACK, 

DIDEN WU, HUSNAL-COLLECTIONS, 

MHESTORE2009, WHOLESALESHOP666, 

CARRIE_YUX-5, 2013TANKSTRONG001, 

MIJIASTORE, PAUTA60, 

SKATEBOARDSTORE2012, SMG-STORE, 

STRONGJENNIE, CHO POWER SPORTS, 

SYLUS, XGN, SHAMOLUOTUO, 

XUEWEIWEIFUZHUANGDIAN, EVERCROSS, 

XIE SHI, RUNCHENYUN, TOMOLOO, 

SHOPCHEAPUNIVERSAL, TOMOLOO-NX, 

AOXTECH, BETTER TOMOLOO, LISON ET, 

HGSM STOREFRONT, GYROOR US, 

Defendants

URBANMAX, GAODESHANGUS, GYROOR, 

FENGCHI-US, JIANGYOU-US, GYROSHOES, 

HGSM, 

Defendants-Appellants

______________________

2022-1071

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 624 Filed: 12/05/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:15741 Case: 22-1071 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 12/05/2022
______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of Illinois in No. 1:20-cv-04806, Judge 

Thomas M. Durkin.

______________________

MANDATE

______________________

In accordance with the judgment of this Court, entered

October 28, 2022, and pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal 

Rules of Appellate Procedure, the formal mandate is 

hereby issued.

FOR THE COURT

December 5, 2022

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner 

Clerk of Court

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 624 Filed: 12/05/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:15742 Case: 22-1071 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 12/05/2022
#### STATE v. HARRIS

No. 270P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 226

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 23 July 1997. Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 23 July 1997.
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 12
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         1997           1996           1995           1994          1993
                                       -------        -------        -------        -------       -------
<S>                                    <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>           <C>
Fixed Charges:
     Int Exp-Borrowings                  1,494            804            547            490           211
     Int Exp-Deposits                   14,711         13,593         12,290         10,054         9,153
     Implicit Int Rent                      51             27             16             19             5
                                       -------        -------        -------        -------       -------
Total Fixed Charges (a)                 16,256         14,424         12,853         10,563         9,369

Earnings                                 6,695          5,642          6,245          4,721         5,371
Earnings (b)                             8,240          6,473          6,808          5,230         5,587
Earnings (c)                            22,951         20,066         19,098         15,284        14,740
Ratio of Earnings
 to Fixed Charges:
     Excluding Int on Deposits            5.33           7.79          12.09          10.28         25.87
     Including Int on Deposits            1.41           1.39           1.49           1.45          1.57
</TABLE>


(a)  For purposes of such computation, the term "fixed charges" represents
     interest expense and a portion of rentals representative of an implicit
     interest factor for such rentals.

(b)  For purposes of such computation, the term "earnings" represents earnings
     before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of change in
     accounting principle plus interest on borrowings and a portion of rentals
     representative of an implicit interest factor for such rentals.

(c)  For purposes of such computation, the term "earnings" represents earnings
     before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of change in 
     accounting principle plus total fixed charges.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.9



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



   
         As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
report dated March 20, 1998, on the financial statements of Patterson
Broadcasting, Inc. and subsidiaries (and to all references to our firm),
included in or made part of this Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file No.
333-48819), Amendment No. 5.
    


                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Dallas, Texas
   
May 26, 1998
TO VOTE: Use the No. 2 Pencil to connect the broken arrow pointing to your choice. like this:

Sample Ballot

Ward 2
OFFICIAL BALLOT

GENERAL ELECTION
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
NOVEMBER 2. 2004

(Ze

= ——

For each office, vote only for the number of candidates indicated. (DO NOT USE RED INK)

ELECTORS OF
PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT
OF THE UNITED STATES

WOTE FOR NO MORE THAN ONE (1)
JOHN F_ KERRY
JOHN EDWARDS a
PATRICIA LaMARCHE ” Sheena me
MICHAEL BADNARIK
RICHARD CAMPAGNA ene
JAMES HARRIS |
WARGARETTROWE
GEORGE W. BUSH
DICK CHENEY —
RALPH NADER |
PETER MIGUEL CAMEJO — ee
‘Werte in, # ony ae
ee i SS Se SE TS SES EIS

DELEGATE TO THE
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

WOTE FOR NO MORE THAN CAE 71)
ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON vaca dam
MICHAEL ANDREW MONROE vere dam
Wete in. # any we

AT-LARGE
MEMBER OF THE COUNCIL

VOTE FOR NO MORE THAN THO 2)
CAROL SCHWARTZ ania
LAURENT ROSS a
KWAME R. BROWN ve
AD. “TONY” DOMINGUEZ SRE
Wet in, # ony et
Write in. # sny i

WARD TWO
MEMBER OF THE COUNCIL

VOTE FOR NO MORE THEN CAE f@
JACK EVANS oo dom
JAY HOUSTON MARX ES om
JESSE JAMES PRICE, SR aahicaen
Virte in. F any om

TO VOTE: Use the No. 2 Pencil to
connect the broken arrow pointing
to your choice. like this

Za

ace

OFFICIAL BALLOT
GENERAL ELECTION

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
NOVEMBER 2. 2004
TO VOTE: Use the No. 2 Pencil to

to your choice, like this

Za

ou ae

For each office, vote only for the
number of candidates indicated.

(DO NOT USE RED INK}

TO VOTE: Use the No. 2 Pencil to
connect the broken arrow pointing
to your choice, like this:

Ze

og

For each office, vote only for the
number of candidates indicated.

(DO NOT USE RED INK)

UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE
VOTE FOR NO MORE THIN ONE f*}

RAY BROWNE cones das
ADAM EIDINGER aoe a
Write in. F orw =

ay EE ED

DISTRICT |
MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF

EDUCATION

WOTE FOR NO MORE THAN ONE iT}

JEFF SMITH
ELEANOR JOHNSON
CHRISTOPHER NicKEON

KEENAN KELLER

trrtt

Witte in, # orw

geo Sea eS

ADVISORY NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMISSIONER XXXX

VOTE FOR NO MIORE THAN ONE [T)

CANDIDATE ONE

‘Weite in, 2 arty

tf
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 397 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 397

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 2003

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
          of a hydroelectric project in the State of Illinois.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 
              PROJECT.

     Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 13 of the 
Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered 11214, the 
Commission may, at the request of the licensee for the project, and 
after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due 
diligence, and public interest requirements of that section and the 
Commission's procedures under that section--
            (1) reinstate the license for the construction of the 
        project as of the effective date of the surrender of the 
        license; and
            (2) extend the time period during which the licensee is 
        required to commence the construction of the project for 3 
        consecutive 2-year periods beyond the date that is 4 years 
        after the date of issuance of the license.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 11, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**EXHIBIT      32**

**STRATFORD      AMERICAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT**

**TO      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                                                                                                                     |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                 Mel L. Shultz                                                                                   |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                          |   |   |        |
| Mel L.                  Shultz,                  President                  and                  DirectorAugust 15, 2005 |   |   |   |

|                                                                                                                                            |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                     David H. Eaton                                                                                                     |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                                 |   |   |        |
| David                      H. Eaton,                      Chief Executive Officer and                      Chairman of the BoardAugust 15, 2005 |   |   |   |

|                                                                                                                                        |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                       Daniel E. Matthews                                                                                           |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                             |   |   |        |
| Daniel                        E. Matthews,                        Controller, Secretary and                        TreasurerAugust 15, 2005 |   |   |   |
EXHIBIT 35.2

 

ANNUALSERVICER’S CERTIFICATE

 

GEDEALER FLOORPLAN MASTER NOTE TRUST

 

March 21,2013

 

The undersigned, aduly authorized officer of GE Commercial Distribution Finance Corporation (“CDF”), as the sub-servicer (the“Sub-Servicer”), pursuant to the Amended and Restated Sub-Servicing Agreement dated as of August 10, 2006 (asmay be further amended and supplemented from time to time, the “Agreement”), between General Electric CapitalCorporation and CDF, does hereby certify that:

 

1.	CDFis, as of the date hereof, Sub-Servicer under the Agreement.

 

2.	The undersigned is an authorized officerwho is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this certificate to the GE Dealer Floorplan Master NoteTrust.

 

3.	A review of the activities of Sub-Servicerduring the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 (the “reporting period”), and of its performance under the Agreement,has been made under my supervision.

 

4.	To the best of my knowledge, basedon such review, Sub-Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reportingperiod.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has duly executed this certificate the date first above written.

 

 

/s/ John E. Peak
Exhibit
        (32.2)
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 The
        undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Report on Form 10-K/A of
        Met-Pro
        Corporation for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007, that (i) the report
        fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of operations of Met-Pro Corporation.
 Date:
                  February 12, 2008
              
              /s/    Gary
                    J. MorganGary
                  J. MorganSenior
                  Vice President and Chief Financial
                  Officer
First Amendment to the Massey Executive Deferred Compensation Program



 Exhibit 10.10 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
 MASSEY EXECUTIVE 
 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PROGRAM 
 (Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2005) 
  
 The Massey Executive Deferred Compensation Program (the “Plan”) is amended as follows: 
  
 1. The following new Section 7.05 is added to the Plan: 
  

	7.05.	TERMINATION OF DEFERRAL ELECTION FOR 409A FUNDS. A Participant may elect in accordance with Question and Answer 20 of IRS Notice 2005-1 to terminate any or all of his deferral
election(s) for any deferral(s) for any 409A Funds which are held in the Plan and are vested as of December 31, 2005 (whether or not attributable to his deferral election or the Company’s contributions, and as adjusted for earnings or
loss). Any such termination election shall be filed with the Committee by such election deadline as it may set but in no event later than December 31, 2005. Any amount to be distributed pursuant to this Section shall be included in the
Participant’s income for federal income tax purposes in calendar year 2005 and shall be distributed on or before December 31, 2005. 

  
 As evidence of its adoption of this amendment of the Plan, Massey Energy Company has caused this document to be signed by its undersigned officer, this
14th day of November, 2005, effective January 1, 2005. 
  

			
	MASSEY ENERGY COMPANY
	
	 /s/ Baxter F. Phillips, Jr.


	By:	 	Baxter F. Phillips, Jr.
	Its:	 	Executive Vice President and
	 	 	Chief Administrative Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ABRAHAM WOLF,

Appellant,

v.

GARRY STARR and BONNIE STARR

,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 13

- 00350

- CV

Appeal from the

243rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2012DCV05225 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be

dismissed for want of jurisdiction, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore

dismiss the appeal. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2015.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge 1

for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and

recommendation of the Honorable John M. Mason, United States

Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

___________

No. 95-3972

___________

Danny D. Goodroad, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Lynn Delano, Commissioner of * District of Minnesota.

Corrections; Les Hawkey, *

Minnehaha County Sheriff; * [UNPUBLISHED]

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, *

Minnesota Attorney General, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: October 25, 1996

 Filed: November 29, 1996

___________

Before BOWMAN, HEANEY, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

The District Court dismissed Danny D. Goodroad's 28 U.S.C. § 2254

1

petition, on the ground that Goodroad was not "in custody" within the

meaning of § 2254 at the time he filed his petition. Goodroad appeals the

dismissal order. 

Having considered the case, we conclude that the District Court's

dismissal of Goodroad's petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction

was correct. No error of law appears, and an opinion
-2-

by this Court would add nothing new to the existing body of law on the "in

custody" requirement. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the District

Court without further discussion.

AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                             SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DIMENSIONAL VISIONS INCORPORATED (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Preston J. Shea, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Preston J. Shea
-------------------
Preston J. Shea
President and Chief Accounting Officer



November 13, 2003
#### John Opal *v.*Dominick Eckert, etc.

Fraud — Burden of Proof.

The burden, of proof to establish fraud rests upon the party charging it.

Fraud — Pleading—Fraudulent Intent.

The allegation that the mortgage in question was made in good faith to secure a pre-existing liability is not objectionable as> an ■affirmative denial of fraudulent intent.

APPEAL. FROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT.

February 13, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay :

We perceive no available defect in the answers of Eckert & Becker. They both assert that the mortgage was made in good faith to secure the payment of an existing liability. It does not matter that the denials of the alleged fraudulent intent are thus affirmatively made. The onus to establish the fraud remained upon the party, making charge. But if it did not, the depositions of the two appel-lees taken by appellant sufficiently show that the mortgage was executed to secure the payment o'f money loaned by Becker to Eckert. The immaterial discrepancies in their statements would not have authorized the chancellor to conclude that they had sworn falsely as to the essential and controlling fact that money to the amount of one thousand dollars had actually been loaned by Becker to Eckert.

As no property was seized under the order of attachment (that was shown by appellant not to be embraced in the mortgage), and *453as he already had a judgment in *personam*for his debt against Eckert, the chancellor properly dismissed his petition.

*Allen, Muir, for appellant.*

*Lee & Rodman, for appellee.*

Judgment *affirmed.*