alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             540
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,694
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (225)
<INVENTORY>                                     10,557
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,703
<PP&E>                                          14,116
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,408)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,565
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            70
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,851
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,230
<SALES>                                         16,259
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,359
<CGS>                                           11,615
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,282
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   103
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    15
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 223
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,121
<INCOME-TAX>                                       701
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,420
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,420
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 3.27



                            CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION

                                       OF

                             WAVY BROADCASTING, LLC

                                      NAME


     The name of the limited liability corporation is WAVY Broadcasting, LLC.


                          REGISTERED AGENT AND OFFICE


     The address of the initial registered office of this corporation is 1013
Centre Road, Wilmington, Delaware, 19805; and the name of the registered agent
of the corporation  in the State of Delaware is the Corporation Service
Company.


Dated:  January 23, 1998
                                   ------------------------------
                                          Gayle C. Toney
#### Garrett B. Gray v. Saginaw Circuit Judge.

*Motions to amend judgment*— Laches.

Mandamus to compel tlie amendment of a judgment for tlie defendant in replevin so as to require return of tlie property, was denied where tlie application was not made until several terms of court after execution liad been satisfied, nor until a new judge was elected.

Mandamus to compel respondent to amend a judgment in replevin so as to require the return of the property to relator, who was the defendant in the action and who prevailed therein. The action was originally brought in justice’s court to obtain possession of a mare held b.y relator ■■and the mare was taken on the writ, and the plaintiff had judgment. On appeal this judgment was reversed, but the judgment then entered for defendant did not order the return of the mare. More than a year later, and after five terms of court had intervened and another judge had come into office, relator moved for the amendment of the judgment by the addition of an order for the return of the property. The motion was granted, as for the correction of a clerical error, but *the*order was afterward set aside, and on a re-argument the application was denied. Belator then proceeded by mandamus.

Submitted and denied June 16.

*O. F. Wisner*for the writ.

*Albert Trash*against.

Per Curiam.

If the relator originally had any right to this remedy, which we do not determine, we are satisfied that by means of the delay and the proceeding on the execution he has waived it.

Writ must be dismissed with costs.
SUBROUTINE DEXCDF(X,CDF)
C
C     PURPOSE--THIS SUBROUTINE COMPUTES THE CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
C              FUNCTION VALUE FOR THE DOUBLE EXPONENTIAL
C              (LAPLACE) DISTRIBUTION WITH MEAN = 0 AND
C              STANDARD DEVIATION = SQRT(2).
C              THIS DISTRIBUTION IS DEFINED FOR ALL X AND HAS
C              THE PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION
C              F(X) = 0.5*EXP(-ABS(X)). 
C     INPUT  ARGUMENTS--X      = THE SINGLE PRECISION VALUE AT
C                                WHICH THE CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
C                                FUNCTION IS TO BE EVALUATED.
C     OUTPUT ARGUMENTS--CDF    = THE SINGLE PRECISION CUMULATIVE
C                                DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION VALUE.
C     OUTPUT--THE SINGLE PRECISION CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
C             FUNCTION VALUE CDF.
C     PRINTING--NONE.
C     RESTRICTIONS--NONE.
C     OTHER DATAPAC   SUBROUTINES NEEDED--NONE.
C     FORTRAN LIBRARY SUBROUTINES NEEDED--EXP.
C     MODE OF INTERNAL OPERATIONS--SINGLE PRECISION.
C     LANGUAGE--ANSI FORTRAN. 
C     REFERENCES--JOHNSON AND KOTZ, CONTINUOUS UNIVARIATE
C                 DISTRIBUTIONS--2, 1970, PAGES 22-36.
C     WRITTEN BY--JAMES J. FILLIBEN
C                 STATISTICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY (205.03)
C                 NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS
C                 WASHINGTON, D. C. 20234
C                 PHONE:  301-921-2315
C     ORIGINAL VERSION--JUNE      1972. 
C     UPDATED         --SEPTEMBER 1975. 
C     UPDATED         --NOVEMBER  1975. 
C
C---------------------------------------------------------------------
C
      IPR=6
C
C     CHECK THE INPUT ARGUMENTS FOR ERRORS.
C     NO INPUT ARGUMENT ERRORS POSSIBLE 
C     FOR THIS DISTRIBUTION.
C
C-----START POINT-----------------------------------------------------
C
      IF(X.LE.0.0)CDF=0.5*EXP(X)
      IF(X.GT.0.0)CDF=1.0-(0.5*EXP(-X)) 
C
      RETURN
      END
OSAC REGISTRY IMPLEMENTATION

RECOGNITION PROGRAM

The Organization of Scientific Area Committees (OSAC) for Forensic Science is seeking assistance to support its 

efforts and ensure proper recognition of forensic science service providers (FSSPs) that have implemented 

standards on the OSAC Registry.

To date, over 145 FSSPs have self-declared their

implementation of standards listed on the OSAC Registry (media 

releases for some of these providers can be found here). 

Additionally, OSAC has received public support for standards 

and implementation from seven major forensic science 

professional organizations (a list of these organizations and their 

statements can be found here). 

If your organization has implemented standards on the 

OSAC Registry, either entire standards or parts of them, you are 

eligible to receive recognition as an OSAC Registry 

Implementer. This recognition includes the issuance of an 

OSAC Implementer Certificate. 

If you would like to see how this information is currently used, please 

review the 2022 OSAC Registry Implementation Survey which can be 

found here.

If your organization is already implementing standards on the OSAC Registry and would like to receive 

recognition for your efforts, please fill out the declaration on the Registry Implementation page and 

send it to forensics@nist.gov.

For additional information, a list of FAQs, and guidance on standard implementation, please visit the OSAC 

Registry Implementation page (QR Code Below) or contact vincent.desiderio@nist.gov.
IOTaB Healthcare Ad-Hoc Group

Overview

• Ad-Hoc Group Members: Maria R., Dan C., Mike B., Ann M.

• Advisor: Barbara C.

• Kickoff Meeting Held: Fri, Feb 17 12noon-1pm Eastern

• Attendees: Maria R., Barbara C., Ann M.

• Overall Focus Areas for Discussion: Barriers of IOT Adoption, Achieving Overall IOT Value

Section Outline

I. Definition of IOMT, IOT

- What’s included but also what’s excluded

- Criticality and triage

- Operational (OT) (air handlers, sterilization) vs. (printers, computers)

II. Cybersecurity and Privacy

III. Asset Inventory & Management

IV. Device Lifecycle Management

V. Validation from Device Manufacturers

VI. Standards Development and Adoption – Connectness, inconsistent UI across devices, algorithms 

and AI

VII. Brand and device change ease

VIII. Station to Bedside to Virtual (Telehealth) to Home to Car/Vehicles

IX. Mobile Apps & Tracker – HIPAA protection

X. Provider Portals

XI. Data Feeds to/from IOMT

XII. B2C, B2B, B2G

XIII. Data at Risk

- Device data, PII, identify and access management, medical, health, genomic, encryption, 

protection, bugs, customer support, technical or access or UI issues, claims

XIV. Education 

- Understanding the device, its purpose and use for consumer, staff, family members

Proposed Speakers for IOTAB Meetings

• Dina Katabi, MIT Professor https://www.linkedin.com/in/dina-katabi-19653a/
Background Material and Readings

CTA 5G Health IoT 

White Paper Dec 2020

Source: https://shop.cta.tech/products/impact-of-5g-and-iot-on-health-care-and-accessibility

CR Reproductive 

Health Apps A Digital 

Source: https://digital-lab.consumerreports.org/2020/08/17/reproductive-health-apps-a-digitalstandard-case-study/

CR Peace of Mind 

Mental Health App Pri 

Source: https://advocacy.consumerreports.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/CR_mentalhealth_fullreport_VF.pdf

MIT Ambient 

Intelligence Healthcare 

Source: MIT Wireless Lab, Dr. Katabi
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                     CONSENT OF LANE GORMAN TRUBITT, L.L.P.
 
   
     We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to
the use of our report dated February 7, 1997, with respect to the financial
statements of Clark/Bardes, Inc. included in Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
Statement (Form S-1 No. 333-56799) and the related Prospectus of Clark/Bardes,
Inc. (the predecessor company to Clark/Bardes Holding, Inc.) for the
registration of its common stock.
    
 
   
                                             /s/ LANE GORMAN TRUBITT, L.L.P.
    
                                            ------------------------------------
   
                                                LANE GORMAN TRUBITT, L.L.P.
    
 
Dallas, Texas
   
August 10, 1998
NIST’s Automotive Cybersecurity

Community of Interest (COI)

Nakia Grayson (NIST)
Background/Purpose

• Kicked off in February 2023

• Provide a communication channel 

to the industry for NIST work

• Allow industry participants to 

engage with NIST on work that 

they find related to the automotive 

industry

• Assist NIST in identifying possible 

areas of work that would enhance 

the cybersecurity of vehicles and 

the transportation sector

Credit: Shutterstock.com
Member Participation

• 361 members in the COI group

▪ 17 government, 20 academia, 320+ industry

• Average of 60-100 attendees on each call

Credit: Shutterstock.com
Past Meetings & Recordings

• February 7th: Overview of NIST Automotive Cybersecurity Related work

▪ https://csrc.nist.gov/Presentations/2023/introductory-webinar

▪ https://csrc.nist.gov/Presentations/2023/ai-rmf

• April 19th: Cybersecurity Framework and it’s Journey to Version 2.0

▪ https://csrc.nist.gov/Presentations/2023/journey-to-csf-2-0

• May 9th: Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM)

▪ Had to re-record after meeting and working to put video on website

All past meetings recordings: https://csrc.nist.gov/Events/2023/automotivecybersecurity-community-of-interest-2nd -
Additional Information about COI

• Meeting occurrence: Monthly via WebEx

• Next Steps: Resume in the Fall of this year

▪ Future Topics: 5G, Crypto, Coding signing, Enabling technology

• Website: https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/auto-cybersecurity-coi

• How to Join COI: https://groups.google.com/a/list.nist.gov/g/autoseccoi -
Nakia Grayson

IT Security Specialist 

NIST

nakia.grayson@nist.gov

Automotive Cybersecurity 

COI Team

Autoseccoi-inquiry@nist.gov
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER and PRINCIPAL
       FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
          OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Everest Fund, L.P.
(the "Partnership"), for the quarter ended March 31, 2013,
as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Lamoureux, President
of Everest Asset Management, Inc., the general partner of
the Everest Fund, L.P. (the "Fund"), hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Fund.




      By:  /s/ Peter Lamoureux
         ----------------------
      Name: 	Peter Lamoureux
      Title: 	Director, President and
      		Treasurer

      May 15, 2013


		E-3
10588.

#### Seaboard Air-Line Railway Company *v.*Pruitt.

Stephens, J.

1. In a suit by a shipper against a carrier to recover damages for failure to deliver a shipment of live stock promptly and in good order, the trial judge, in compliance with a request by the carrier, instructed the jury that a special contract of shipment, which relieves the carrier of all damage resulting from the carrier’s negligence other than gross negligence, was binding on the shipper unless the shipper showed that the carrier was guilty of negligence. The carrier, having made such request to charge, is estopped from excepting to the charge upon the ground that the judge failed to charge that the carrier would not be liable under such special contract unless the-carrier was guilty of gross negligence.

2. A shipper of live stock under a special contract may recover from the carrier any damages sustained by him as a result of any extra expense which he may have incurred in feeding and caring for such live stock by reason of any unreasonable delay caused by the gross negligence of the carrier in failing to transport and deliver the shipment at the point of destination.

3. “Where a carrier fails to deliver .goods in a reasonable time, the measure of damage is the difference between the market value at the time and place they should have been delivered and the time of actual delivery” (Civil Code (1910), § 2773); and a common carrier cannot by special contract relieve itself-from this measure of damage, where the goods are damaged by reason of its negligence.

4. The first ground of the amendment to the motion for new trial, wherein the admission of certain evidence is excepted to, failing to show upon what ground objection was urged to such testimony, cannot be considered.

5. The evidence authorized the inference that the plaintiff’s loss was due to the negligence of the defendant company in failing to deliver promptly the shipment of live stock, rather than to any negligence upon the part of the plaintiff to properly feed and care for the live stock while in transit.

6. There being neither in the bill of exceptions nor in this court before argument begun any assignment of error upon the exceptions pendente lite, the latter will not be considered. A bare recital in the bill of *749exceptions that exceptions pendente lite were taken, without more, does not amount to an assignment of error upon the exceptions pendente lite.

Decided February 9, 1920.

Action for damages; from city court of Americus—Judge Harper. April 30, 1919.

*W. W. Dykes, R. T. Hawkins,*for plaintiff in error.

*Shipp & Sheppard,*contra.

7. The evidence authorized the verdict, and no error of law was committed. *Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.*
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 6057

WARREN MATTHEW GIDDINGS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. George Jarrod Hazel , District Judge. ( 1:21

- cv - 00959

- GJH )

Submitted : April 26 , 2022 Decided: April 29, 2022

Before AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Warren Matthew Giddings, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Warren Matthew Giddings appeals the district court’s o rder denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Giddings v. Montgomery Cnty. , No. 1:21

- cv - 00959

- GJH (D. Md. Dec. 15, 20 21). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Effective date:*                         December 2, 2014.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 25, 2014, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Contract 99 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2015-9, CP2015-12.                

Stanley F. Mires,

Attorney, Federal Requirements.

[FR Doc. 2014-28296 Filed 12-1-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3910

To amend the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century to modify 

a high priority project in the State of Michigan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 4, 2004

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To amend the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century to modify a high priority project in the State of 

Michigan.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. HIGH PRIORITY PROJECT, MICHIGAN. 

4 Item number 820 of the table contained in section 

5 1602 of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Cen6 tury (112 Stat. 287) is amended by striking ‘‘Conduct’’ 

7 and all that follows through ‘‘interchange’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘Conduct a transportation needs study and make improve9 ments to 1–75 interchanges in the Grayling area’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The Company's Unaudited Financial Statements for the
Three Months Ended August 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                         405,842
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,347
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               411,189
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 411,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,589
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,002
<OTHER-SE>                                     395,598
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   411,189
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,875
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,291
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,416)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,416)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,416)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>