Priority Action Report

Firearms and Toolmarks

Physics and Pattern 

Andy Smith

February 2016
Subcommittee Leadership

Position Name Organization Term Email

Chair Andy Smith San Francisco Police 

Dept Crime Lab 3 yrs andy.smith@sfgov.org 

Vice Chair Todd Weller Oakland Police Dept, 

Criminalistics Lab 3 yrs tweller@oaklandnet.com 

Executive 

Secretary

Wendy Gibson VA Dept of Forensic 

Science 3 yrs Wendy.gibson@dfs.virginia.gov

2
Subcommittee Members

# Name Organization Ter

m

Email

1 Steve Scott FBI 2 yrs james.scott@ic.fbi.gov

2 Mike Neel BATF 4 yrs michael.neel@atf.gov

3 Xiaoyu Alan Zheng NIST 3 yrs alan.zheng@nist.gov

4 Ted Vorburger, PhD NIST 2 yrs tvtv@nist.gov

5 Eric Collins Contra Costa Co Sheriff Forensic Services 4 yrs ecoll@so.cccounty.us

6 Doug Murphy FBI 3 yrs douglas.murphy@ic.fbi.gov

7 Max Morris, PhD Iowa State University 4 yrs mmorris@iastate.edu

8 Laura Fleming Dallas PD Crime Lab 3 yrs laura.fleming@dallascounty.org

9 David Wright Johnson Co (KS) Sheriff's Criminalistics Lab 2 yrs david.wright@jocogov.org

10 Chris Monturo Miami Valley Regional Crime Lab 2 yrs caspian45@sbcglobal.net

11 Gabe Hernandez Miami-Dade Police Department 3 yrs ghernandez@mdpd.com

12 Erich Smith FBI 4 yrs erich.smith@ic.fbi.gov

13 James Carroll Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Office 2 yrs jpcarrol@lasd.org

14 Cassey Allen TX Department of Public Safety - Austin 4 yrs Cassey.Allen@dps.texas.gov

15 Ryan Lilien, MD, PhD Cadre Research Labs 3 yrs ryan@cadreresearch.com

16 Ron Nichols BATF 2 yrs Ronald.G.Nichols@usdoj.gov

17 Bill Demuth Illinois State Police 4 yrs Bill_Demuth@isp.state.il.us

3
4
5

7; 35%

3; 15%

8; 40%

1; 

5%

1; 5% Federal Government

State Government

Local Government

FFRDC

Academic

Private

Employer Classification Mix
6

16; 80%

3; 15%

1; 5%

Practitioner

Researcher

R&D Technology Partner

Educator/Trainer

Quality Assurance Manager

Attorney

Judge

Other

Job Classification Mix
Discipline Description

The Subcommittee on Firearms and 

Toolmarks will focus on standards and 

guidelines related to the examination of 

firearm and toolmark evidence. This 

includes the comparison of microscopic 

toolmarks on bullets, cartridge cases, and 

other ammunition components. 

Examinations may also include firearm 

function testing, serial number restoration, 

muzzle-to-object distance determination, 

tools, and toolmarks.

7
Topic 1: Technology Development, 

Validation, and Implementation 

Priority Level: Medium

• Provide standards for evaluating new measurement and 

comparison methods to enhance the process of firearm and 

toolmark examinations.

• Specify hardware quality assurance protocols and validation 

requirements for software and statistical conclusions.

• Specify processes for utilizing new technologies in forensic 

laboratories. This includes hit verification, virtual microscopy, 

inter-lab data exchange, dispute resolution, and training.

Task Group Name: Technology Development, Validation, and Implementation 

Task Group Chair Name: Ryan Lilien (chair)

Members: Alan Zheng, Erich Smith, Dr. Nick Petraco

Affiliate Members: Dr. Ben Bachrach

Task Group Chair Contact Information: ryan@cadreresearch.com 

8
Relevant Documents

Title Organization

ASCLD/LAB Methods for Validating Technologies and Technical 

Procedures

ISO 17025

SWGDAM Validation Guidelines for DNA Analysis Methods SWGDAM

Geometric Product Specifications: Topography Measuring Methods ISO 25178-6,601-606,72

Applications of Surface Metrology in Firearm Identification, Zheng, 

Soons, Vorburger, Song, Renegar, Thompson

Surface Topography:

Metrology and 

Properties (2014)

FBI Lab Operations Manual (various sections) FBI

Topic 1: Technology Development, Validation, and Implementation 

9
Committee Action Plan

Priority 

(high/med/low/) Planned Actions Approx. 

Deadline Assignee

High

COMPLETED

Topography Analysis and 

Comparison Software for 

Toolmarks – DRAFT DOCUMENT

Sent to Resource 

Committees –

Reviewing 

Comments

Technology Task Group

High

COMPLETED

Implementation of 3D 

Technologies in Forensic 

Laboratories – DRAFT 

DOCUMENT

Sent to Resource 

Committees –

Reviewing 

Comments

Technology Task Group

High

COMPLETED

3D Measurement Hardware and 

Measurement Quality Control –

DRAFT DOCUMENT

Sent to Resource 

Committees –

Reviewing 

Comments

Technology Task Group

Topic 1: Technology Development, Validation, and Implementation 

10
Topic 2: Firearm and Toolmark

Examination Standards

Priority Level: High

• Development of standard methods for the examination of firearm 

and toolmark evidence

Task Group Name: Firearm and Toolmark Examination Standards 

Task Group Chair Name: David Wright

Members: Steve Scott, James Carroll, Cassey Allen

Task Group Chair Contact Information: david.wright@jocogov.org 

11
Relevant Documents

Title Organization

Guideline for the Documentation of Firearm Examinations SWGGUN

Guidelines for Trigger Pull Analysis SWGGUN

Guidelines for Barrel and Overall Length Measurements for Firearms SWGGUN

Forensic Examination Guidelines for Silencers SWGGUN

Guidelines for the documentation of the examination of tools and 

toolmarks

SWGGUN

Guidelines for the Documentation of the Examination of Ammunition 

and Ammunition Components

SWGGUN

Guideline for the Documentation of Firearm Examinations SWGGUN

Topic 2: Firearm and Toolmark Examination Standards

12
Committee Action Plan

Priority 

(high/med/l

ow/)

Planned Actions Approx. 

Deadline Assignee

High

COMPLETED 

Standard Guideline/Best Practice for the 

Safe Handling of Firearms and Ammunition 

– DRAFT DOCUMENT

In Review/Edit –

ready for release to 

Resource 

Committees

FA Standards Task Group

High Standard Test Method for the Physical 

Examination and Classification of Firearms

April 2017 – reviewing ASB document 

connection protocols

FA Standards Task Group

High Standard Test Method for 

Function/Operability Testing of Firearms

April 2017 –

reviewing ASB document 

connection protocols

FA Standards Task Group

High Standard Test Method for Measuring 

Trigger Pull of Firearms

April 2017 – reviewing 

ASB document 

connection protocols

FA Standards Task Group

High Standard Test Method for Measuring 

Barrel and Overall Length of Firearms

April 2017 – reviewing 

ASB document 

connection protocols

FA Standards Task Group

– in conjunction with UOM 

Task Group

Topic 2: Firearm and Toolmark Examination Standards

13
Topic 3: Uncertainty of Measurement

Priority Level: Medium

• Procedures to express the uncertainty for measurements of 

physical quantities that matter for firearm and toolmark analysis; 

• Includes: issues associated with quantifying uncertainty in decision 

making.

Task Group Name: Uncertainty of Measurement

Task Group Chair Name: Dr. Ted Vorburger

Members: Chris Monturo, Dr. Max Morris 

Affiliate Members: Dr. Nick Petraco

Task Group Chair Contact Information: tvtv@nist.gov 

14
Relevant Documents

Title Organization

Policy on Measurement Uncertainty ASCLD/LAB

Measurement Uncertainty Estimation Form ASCLD/LAB

Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty of Measurement ISO

Topic 3: Uncertainty of Measurement

15
Standards/Guidelines to Move Forward

Title Organization Suggested OSAC Process:

(Registry, SDO, Canvass)

SWGGUN Guidelines for Barrel and Overall Length

Measurements for Firearms, 9/26/13

(in cooperation with Task Group 2)

SWGGUN In process

Amendments proposed to the above SWGGUN 

Guidelines:

-Section entitled “Uncertainty for Barrel and Overall 

Length (B/OL) Measurements” (drafted)

-Spreadsheet for estimating measurement uncertainty 

for B/OL with worked example (drafted).

-Spreadsheet with example for calculating gauge 

repeatability and reproducibility (GR&R) for B/OL 

(drafted).

SWGGUN Review by Task Group 2 

and other Subcommittee 

Experts

Topic 3: Uncertainty of Measurement

16
Committee Action Plan

Priority 

(high/med/lo

w/)

Actions – Completed and Planned Approx. 

Deadline Assignee

High

COMPLETED

“Uncertainty for B/OL Measurement”

and Two Spreadsheets– DRAFTED

In Resource 

Committee 

Review

UOM Task Group

High Review of “Uncertainty for B/OL 

Measurement” and Two Spreadsheets 

- DRAFTED

In Resource 

Committee 

Review

UOM Task Group – in 

conjunction with FA 

Standards Task Group

Medium -- Consideration of statistical methods 

for characterizing probabilities in 

courts of law for firearm and toolmark

issues. 

-- UOM in the examination process

To be 

determined

UOM Task Group

Topic 3: Uncertainty of Measurement

17
Topic 4: Training Program

Priority Level: Medium

• Development of standard methods for a Training Program

• Outline Program for Firearms Identification and Toolmark Identification

• Inclusive of Serial Number Restoration & Muzzle-to-Object Determination

• Establish measures for Competency Testing

Task Group Name: Training Program

Task Group Chair Name: Gabe Hernandez

Members: Laura Fleming, James Carroll, Bill Demuth

Affiliate Members: Jodi Marsanopoli

Task Group Chair Contact Information: gahernandez@mdpd.com

18
Relevant Documents

Title Organization

Recommended Guidelines for Developing a Training Manual SWGGUN

Firearm Examiner Training National Forensic Science 

Technology Center

Training Manual Association of Firearm 

and Tool Mark Examiners

Topic 4: Training Program

19
Committee Action Plan

Priority 

(high/med/l

ow/)

Planned Actions Approx. 

Deadline Assignee

High Minimum Qualifications for 

Firearm and Toolmark Examiner

April 2017 Training Program Task 

Group

High Minimum Qualifications for 

Firearm and Toolmark Examiner 

Trainee

April 2017 Training Program Task 

Group

High Required Material/Modules of 

Instruction for Firearm and 

Toolmark Examiner in Training

April 2017 Training Program Task 

Group

Topic 4: Training Program

20
Topic 5: Standard Criteria for 

Identification, Documentation, and 

Reporting

Priority Level: High

• Development of minimum standards for: 1) the criteria used to 

draw conclusions regarding the identification or elimination of a 

questioned toolmark to a known or the same unknown tool or 

firearm (including an evaluation of potential subclass 

characteristics); 2) the supporting documentation for such 

examinations and conclusions; and 3) the reporting of 

conclusions

Task Group Name: Standard Criteria for Identification, Documentation, and 

Reporting

Task Group Chair Name: Eric Collins

Members: Mike Haag, Mike Neel, Max Morris, Doug Murphy, Ron Nichols

Affiliates: John Murdock, Nancy McCombs

Task Group Chair Contact Information: ecoll@so.cccounty.us 

21
Relevant Documents

Title Organization

AFTE Theory of ID AFTE

AFTE Range of Conclusions AFTE

AFTE Glossary AFTE

AFTE Documentation Standard (2006) AFTE

Guidelines for the Standardization of Comparison Documentation SWGGUN

Elimination Factors Related to FA/TM Examinations SWGGUN

Guidelines: Criteria for Identification SWGGUN

Topic 5 Standard Criteria for Identification, Documentation, and 

Reporting

22
Committee Action Plan

Priority 

(high/med/l

ow/)

Planned Actions Approx. 

Deadline Assignee

High

COMPLETED

Standard for Criteria for Identification –

INITIAL DRAFT

In Review/Edit – April 

2017

Eric Collins & John Murdock

High

COMPLETED

Criteria for Elimination – INITIAL DRAFT In Review/Edit – April 

2017

Mike Neel & John Murdock

High

COMPLETED

Evaluation of Subclass Characteristics –

INITIAL DRAFT

In Review/Edit – April 

2017

Doug Murphy

High

COMPLETED

Verification of ID & Elimination – INITIAL 

DRAFT

In Review/Edit – April

2017

John Murdock, Nancy 

McCombs, Ron Nichols

High

COMPLETED

Examination Documentation – INITIAL DRAFT In Review/Edit – April 

2017

Mike Haag

High Reporting of Conclusions April 2017 Eric Collins – in conjunction 

with Terminology Task Group

Medium Terminology April 2017 In conjunction with 

Terminology Task Group and 

Glossary

Topic 5: Standard Criteria for Identification, Documentation, and 

Reporting

23
Topic 6: Terminology / Report writing

Priority Level: High

• Review existing glossaries to determine if terms and definitions 

are appropriate and sufficient for use and make adjustments or 

additions were necessary. Develop minimum report writing 

requirements and standardized language.

Task Group Name: Terminology

Task Group Chair Name: Bill Demuth

Members: N/A

Task Group Chair Contact Information: Bill.Demuth@isp.state.il.us 

24
Relevant Documents

Title Organization

AFTE Glossary AFTE

SWGGUN Glossary SWGGUN

Topic 1: Technology Development, Validation, and Implementation 

25
Priority 

(high/med/l

ow/)

Planned Actions Approx. 

Deadline Assignee

High OSAC Subcommittee on 

Firearms and Toolmarks

Glossary

COMPLETED Terminology Task 

Group

High Evaluate report wording

examples from various members 

of the OSAC to determine 

minimum requirements

On Hold Terminology Task 

Group

High Develop standardized report 

writing examples

On Hold Terminology Task 

Group

Topic 6: Terminology / Report writing

26

Committee Action Plan
Additional Items of Interest

• The Committee recognizes the foundation laid by the work of SWGGUN 

and fully expects to expand on that groundwork to develop more robust 

and functioning standards for the Discipline

• All previous guidelines developed by SWGGUN were reviewed and with the 

exception of very specific guidelines the SWGGUN guidelines will be utilized as 

the basis for the standards created

• To insure that work can be accomplished in a timely fashion it was by 

design to only create a few task groups so efforts can be concentrated on 

the most important tasks first

• Other areas of interest to be covered by the Committee include:

• Certification of Examiners

• Continuing Education of Examiners

• Scientific Method and it Use in Casework and Research

• Research in the Discipline (current state and review – future needs)

• Testimony Language

• Reference Libraries and Reference Collections

27
Summary

Rank Topic Area

1 Firearm and Toolmark Examination 

Standards

2 Terminology – Reporting of 

Conclusions

3 Criteria for Identification / Criteria 

for Elimination

4 Uncertainty of Measurement

5 Training Standards

6 Technology Validation and 

Implementation

• Task Groups have established reasonable, albeit 

pressing timelines

• Task groups have utilized virtual meetings to work on 

completing project objectives

• Committee as a whole is working diligently to produce 

the best documents to move forward through the SDO 

and Registry process

• The Academy Standards Board (AAFS) has been chosen 

as the SDO process for subcommittee documents 

• The use of affiliate members has been greatly 

beneficial in adding input from the community outside 

of the subcommittee voting members

• Although ranked, the topic areas will be worked on 

concurrently; however, some Task Groups given their 

topic area will be able to produce standards quicker 

and more frequently than some other Task Groups

• Each topic area was determined as the most pertinent 

areas needing standards within the Firearm and 

Toolmark discipline

• Next in-person meeting April 2017

28