alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 18

                                                       EXHIBIT 15
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, Northwest
Washington, D.C.  20549
Attn.:  Document Control

Re:  Oryx Energy Company Form 10-Q

We  are aware that our report dated August 10, 1998 on our review
of  the  interim  condensed consolidated balance  sheet  of  Oryx
Energy Company and its Subsidiaries as of June 30, 1998, and  the
related condensed consolidated statements of income for the three
and  six  months  ended June 30, 1998 and 1997, and  the  related
condensed  consolidated  statements of cash  flows  for  the  six
months ended June 30, 1998 and 1997, included in this Form  10-Q,
is  incorporated  by  reference  in  the  following  registration
statements:

                                                      Registration No.
On Form S-3 for:
<TABLE>
<S>                                                       <C>
  Oryx Energy Company $500,000,000 Debt Securities;
  Preferred Stock; and Common Stock                        33-45611

  Oryx Energy Company $600,000,000 Debt Securities         33-33361

  Oryx Energy Company 7,259,394 shares of Common Stock     33-36799

  Oryx Energy Company $500,000,000 Debt Securities;
    Preferred Stock; and Common Stock                     333-33373

On Form S-8 for:

  Oryx Energy Company 1992 Long-Term Incentive Plan        33-42695

  Oryx Energy Company Long-Term Incentive Plan             33-25032

  Oryx Energy Company Capital Accumulation Plan            33-24918

  Oryx Energy Company Equity and Deferred Compensation
  Plan for Non-Employee Directors                         333-03075

  Oryx Energy Company Executive Variable Incentive Plan   333-03089

  Oryx Energy Company 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan       333-26563

</TABLE>

Pursuant  to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of  1933,  this
report  should  not  be  considered a part  of  the  registration
statement  prepared  or  certified by us within  the  meaning  of
Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


                                   /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                

Dallas, Texas
August 10, 1998

<PAGE>
Pickering 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

be grounds to dismiss the appeal); see also Varnum v. Grady, 90 Nev. 374, 

376-77, 528 P.2d 1027, 1028-29 (1974) (dismissing appeal for failure to 

timely file record on appeal). 

It is so ORDERED. 

Parraguirre

r , J. 

J. 

Saitta 

cc: Hon. Robert Teuton, District Judge, Family Court Division 

Valarie I. Fujii & Associates 

Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

2
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  EXHIBIT NO. 23
                                                                                



                         Independent Auditors' Consent
                                        
 The Board of Directors
 Mercantile Bancorporation Inc.:

 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
 2-78395, No. 33-15265, No. 33-33870, No. 33-35139, No. 33-43694, No. 33-48952,
 No. 33-57543, No. 333-47713, and No. 333-55905, each on Form S-8; and No. 33-
 45863, No. 33-52986, No. 33-50981, No. 33-55439, No. 33-58467, No. 33-63609,
 No. 333-09803, No. 333-23607, No. 333-27431, No. 333-42557, No. 333-50203, No.
 333-51329, No. 333-56639, and No. 333-57345, each on Form S-4; and No. 333-
 37547 on Form S-3, of Mercantile Bancorporation Inc. of our report dated
 January 20, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Mercantile
 Bancorporation Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996,
 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders'
 equity, cash flows, and comprehensive income for each of the years in the
 three-year period ended December 31, 1998, which report appears in the Annual
 Report on Form 10-K of Mercantile Bancorporation Inc. for the fiscal year ended
 December 31, 1998.



                                 /s/ KPMG LLP



 St. Louis, Missouri
 March 26, 1999
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December

17, 2019

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-19-00852-CR

EX PARTE SHAUN PHILIP HARDY 

On Appeal from the 212th District Court 

Galveston County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 17-CR-0003 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Appellant, Shaun Philip Hardy, has signed and filed a written request to 

withdraw his notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. Because this court has not 

delivered an opinion, we grant appellant’s request. 

Accordingly, we order the appeal dismissed. We direct the clerk of the court 

to issue the mandate of the court immediately. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan 

Do Not Publish – Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
changing threat landscape that cybersecurity professionals are busy facing 

every day. 

We urge NIST to create a separate Supply Chain Function to address the 

growing importance of supply chain risk management considerations, as 

called for by the CRI. 

Sincerely, 

Pat Opet

Chief Information Security Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50159

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE GUADALUPE MORENO-AMAYA, also known as Enrique

Garcia, also known as Jose G. Moreno, also known as

Jose Guadalupe Moreno, also known as Jose Moreno,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-03-CR-366-ALL

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Guadalupe

Moreno-Amaya concedes that the arguments raised are foreclosed by

circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for further review. 

The Government has moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing

an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of

the district court is AFFIRMED. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**Certification
      Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AHPC Holdings, Inc. (the
      “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Alan E. Zeffer, as
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Deborah J. Bills, as Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Alan E.
      Zeffer


Name:  Alan
      E.
      Zeffer


Title:  Chief
      Executive Officer


Date:  November
      21, 2005




/s/
      Deborah J.
      Bills


Name:  Deborah
      J. Bills


Title:  Chief
      Financial Officer


Date:  November
      21, 2005





This
      certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 subject
      to
      the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
      purpose.
Union Pacific Railroad /s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 22, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00459

- CV

FIBERLIGHT LLC

, Appellant

v.

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.

Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 08880

Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Second Unoppose d Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is

GRANTED. The appellant ’ s brief is due on October 2, 2014.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 22nd day of September, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of True North Energy Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended April 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John I,
      Folnovic, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that;





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/
      John
      I. Folnovic


Name:  John
      I.
      Folnovic


Title:  Chief
      Executive Officer


Date:  May
      31, 2007
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 16

- 00229

- CR
Manuel Abelardo Rojas

v. The State of Texas

On a ppeal from the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. CR

- 1349

- 08

- G

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered th is cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. May 19, 2016
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4156 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4156

    To improve access to physicians in medically underserved areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 2004

Mr. Moran of Kansas (for himself, Mr. Towns, Mr. Osborne, Mr. Stenholm, 
 and Mr. Doggett) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To improve access to physicians in medically underserved areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF FOREIGN COUNTRY RESIDENCE REQUIREMENT WITH RESPECT 
              TO INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL GRADUATES.

    (a) Extension of Deadline.--Section 220(c) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Technical Corrections Act of 1994 (8 U.S.C. 1182 note) (as 
amended by section 11018 of Public Law 107-273) is amended by striking 
``2004.'' and inserting ``2009.''.
    (b) Designation of Health Professional Shortage Areas by State 
Agencies.--Section 214(l)(1)(D) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 
(8 U.S.C. 1184(l)(1)(D)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``professionals,'' and inserting 
        ``professionals or in other shortage locations specified by a 
        State department of public health (or its equivalent),''; and
            (2) by striking ``in a geographic area designated by the 
        Secretary.'' and inserting ``in such a geographic area or other 
        shortage location.''.
    (c) Exemption From H1B Numerical Limitations.--Section 214(l)(2)(A) 
of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(l)(2)(A)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``The numerical limitations contained in subsection (g)(1)(A) shall not 
apply to any alien whose status is changed under the preceding 
sentence, if the alien obtained a waiver of the 2-year foreign 
residence requirement upon a request by an interested State agency.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> CT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,129,972
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,129,972
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,323,752
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (485,072)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (485,072)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (485.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (485.07)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Walter Industries, Inc.Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

In connection withthe accompanying Annual Report of Walter Industries, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006(the “Report”), I, Gregory E. Hyland, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  November 9, 2006

|   | /s/ GREGORY  E. HYLAND  |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Gregory E. Hyland       |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 10.6

$500,000                                                Rapid City, South Dakota
                                                                   March 6, 1998
                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

         FOR VALUE RECEIVED, CONCORDE GAMING CORPORATION and CONCORDE CRIPPLE
CREEK, INC. ("CO-MAKERS"), both Colorado corporations with their principal
places of business being at 3290 Lien Street, Rapid City, South Dakota, promises
to pay to the order of BRUCE H. LIEN ("HOLDER"), an individual with his
principal place of business at 3290 Lien Street, Rapid City, South Dakota 57702,
the sum of Five Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($500,000) together with
interest equal to the Reference Rate quoted by BNC National Bank, plus 3.5%.
Co-Makers shall make eleven (11) monthly payments of Eight Thousand Five Hundred
and No/100 Dollars ($8,500), plus interest, with the first monthly payment due
April 6, 1998. The entire unpaid principal and accrued and unpaid interest
hereon shall be due and payable in full on March 5, 1999.

         The Co-Makers may prepay this Note in whole or in part at any time
without penalty.

         In the event of default hereunder the undersigned agrees that HOLDER
shall have all rights reserved herein, including all expenses of collection. The
undersigned waives demand, presentment, notice of non-payment, protest, notice
of protest and notice of dishonor.

         The makers, endorsers, sureties and guarantors hereof hereby severally
waive presentment for payments, notice of non-payment, protest and notice of
protest. The amount loaned by HOLDER shall be at HOLDER'S discretion and will
not exceed Six Hundred Ninety Thousand and No/100 Dollars. Payment schedule may
be extended at the option of HOLDER of this note.

         The undersigned hereby severally agree to pay all costs for any
collections necessary.

                                       CONCORDE GAMING CORPORATION
                                       (CO-MAKER)
                                       By:  Jerry L. Baum
                                       Its: President

                                       Signature: /s/ Jerry L. Baum
                                                  ------------------------------

                                       CONCORDE CRIPPLE CREEK, INC.
                                       (CO-MAKER)
                                       By:  Jerry L. Baum
                                       Its: President

                                       Signature: /s/ Jerry L. Baum
                                                  ------------------------------

                                       BRUCE H. LIEN
                                       (HOLDER)

                                       /s/ Bruce H. Lien
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Bruce H. Lien
EXHIBIT
        10.1

      


      On
        January 1, 2005, Harry I. Freund, Chairman of PubliCARD, Inc. (the “Company”),
        and Jay S. Goldsmith, Vice Chairman of the Company, resigned their officer
        positions with the Company. Mr. Freund and Mr. Goldsmith remain as Chairman
        and
        Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, respectively. From
        October 1998 through December 2004, Mr. Freund and Mr. Goldsmith received
        compensation in respect of their officer positions as Chairman and Vice Chairman
        of the Company, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2004, annual
        compensation in such capacity was $150,000 each. Pursuant to informal
        arrangements with the Company, effective January 1, 2005, Mr. Freund and
        Mr.
        Goldsmith each began to receive annual compensation at the rate of $100,000
        per
        year as Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors, respectively,
        and
        for providing certain services as described below. These arrangements have
        indefinite terms and are terminable at any time by either party. 

      


      Mr.
        Freund and Mr. Goldsmith provide advice and counsel to the Company on a variety
        of strategic and financial matters, including business acquisitions and
        divestitures, raising capital and shareholder relations. Mr. Freund and Mr.
        Goldsmith do not render any services in connection with the day-to-day
        operations of the Company. Services are provided on a less than full time
        basis,
        with the amount of time varying depending on the activities in which the
        Company
        is engaged from time to time. The arrangements with the Company do not provide
        for a minimum amount of time to be spent on Company matters by Messrs. Freund
        and Goldsmith.

      


      Through
        September 30, 2000, directors who were not officers of the Company were paid
        $2,500 per month for services as directors and, in addition, $750 per day
        for
        each meeting of the board or of shareholders that they attended without regard
        to the number of meetings attended each day. Effective October 1, 2000, the
        monthly retainer and per diem fees were suspended. Effective May 1, 2005,
        the
        Company reinstituted compensation for non-employee directors, excluding the
        Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors, at the rate of $2,000
        per
        month.

      


      On
        May
        17, 2005, the Directors Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board
        of
        Directors approved, the compensation for non-employee directors, including
        such
        amounts received by Mr. Freund and Mr. Goldsmith.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**_____________** No. 21

- 51096 **consolidated with** No. 21

- 51097 Summary Calendar

**_____________**
**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**William Gonzalez**

**- Ramirez,**  Defendant

— Appellant

**.**
Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:21

- CR

- 555

- 1 USDC No. 4:21

- CR

- 641

- 1

Before **Southwick, Oldham,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per**  **Curiam :**  *

* Pursuant to **5th C ir**  **cuit R**  **ule** 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 5, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-51096 Document: 00516421647 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/05/2022No. 21

- 51096 c/w No . 21

- 51097

2 William Gonzalez

- Ramirez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, as well as the revocation of the term of supervised release he was serving at the time of the offense. He argues th at 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional because it allows a sentence above the otherwise applicable statutory maximum of two years of imprisonment and one year of supervised release based on facts that are neither alleged in the indictment nor found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. Because Gonzalez

- Ramirez does not address the validity of the revocation or the revocation sentence, he has abandoned any challenge to them. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224

– 25 (5th Cir. 1993).
Gonzalez

- Ramirez has filed an unopposed motion for summary disposition and a letter brief correctly conceding that the issue is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998). He explains that he has raised the issue only to preserve it for possibl e further review. Accordingly , summary disposition is appropriate

. S ee Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969)

. Gonzalez

- Ramirez ’s motion is **GRANTED** , and the district court’s judgments are **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 21-51096 Document: 00516421647 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/05/2022
10596.

#### Parker *v.*The State.

Decided July 23, 1919.

Indictment for misdemeanor; from Glascock superior court— Judge Walker. April 18, 1919.

*E. B. Bogers,*for plaintiff in error.

*B. 0. Norman, solicitor-general,*contra.

Broyles, P. J.

Conceding, but not deciding, that the lard-can found in the defendant’s house was an apparatus for the distilling and manufacturing of whisky, within the meaning- of section 22 of the act of the General Assembly approved March 28, 1917 (Acts 1917, Ex. Sess., p. 18), the undisputed evidence showed that the lard-can had been brought to the house and left there in the defendant’s absence, and had been there only a few hours when found by the officers, and that although the defendant was present in the house when it was found, he had not been told and did not know of its presence. It follows that his conviction was unauthorized, and the court erred in overruling his motion for a new trial.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.*
No. 87-1174.

#### Sterling Bancorp *v.*New York City Department of Finance et al.

Appeal from App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept., dismissed for want of substantial federal question.