alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.5



               [NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. LETTERHEAD]




           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS


     As independent oil and gas consultants, Netherland, Sewell & Associates,
Inc. hereby consents to the references to our firm and to our reserve report
dated December 31, 1997 in the Transition Report on Form 10-K of Chesapeake
Energy Corporation incorporated by reference into the Prospectus constituting
part of the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Chesapeake Energy Corporation
to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about June 19,
1998.


                                   NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.



                                   By:   /s/ FREDERIC D. SEWELL
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Frederic D. Sewell
                                        President


Dallas, Texas
June 19, 1998
February 26, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ROBERT SALINAS, JR., Appellant

NO. 14-11-00747-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having 

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in judgment. The Court 

orders the judgment AFFIRMED, and that this decision be certified below for 

observance.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1




                      CONSENT TO BE NAMED AS TRUST MANAGER

         I, Norman Braman, hereby consent to be nominated as a trust manager of
Automotive Realty Trust of America, and to be named as a nominated trust
manager in the Form S-11 Registration Statement filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission by Automotive Realty Trust of America.

Dated:   March 27, 1998

                                        /s/  Norman Braman 
                                        -----------------------------------
                                             Norman Braman
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              THIS   SCHEDULE    CONTAINS   SUMMARY    FINANCIAL
                              INFORMATION   EXTRACTED   FROM  THE   CONSOLIDATED
                              BALANCE  SHEET AT MARCH 31,  1998 AND THE  RELATED
                              CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND OF CASH
                              FLOWS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 OF
                              STRATFORD    AMERICAN    CORPORATION    AND    ITS
                              SUBSIDIARIES  AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
                              REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                             528,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      867,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       167,000
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,433,000
<PP&E>                                             686,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                     341,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,813,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,279,000
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           881,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,805,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,813,000
<SALES>                                              2,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,967,000
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,970,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    57,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  62,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    878,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                878,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       878,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .01
                                               

</TABLE>
A Testing Foundation for 

Sharing Latent Identification

Services 

Tom Hopper 

thopper@cogentsystems.com 
State & Local AFIS '01 
3 
4 
Latent 

Encoding 

Workstation 

(Vendor A) 

AFIS 

(Vendor A) 

Proprietary 

Search Record 

(minutiae) 

5 
Vendor A 

Vendor B 

Vendor C 

6 
Universal 

Latent 

Encoding 

Workstation 

Vendor A 

ANSI/NIST 

Search Record 

(Type 9) Vendor B 

Vendor C 

7 
8 

ANSI/NIST

Data Format 

Header 1 

Descriptive 

Data 2 

Image Features Minutiae 

Ridge Cnts 

Core 

Delta 4/7 9 

IQS 

EFTS 

Required Fields 

AFIS Vendor’s 

Specifications 

9:013 ... 9:030 FBI IAFIS feature data 

9:031 ... 9:055 Cogent feature data 

9:056 ... 9:070 Printrak feature data 

9:071 ... 9:099 Morpho feature data 

9:100 ... 9:125 NEC feature data 
Vendor (Standard) Specific Rules 

9 
Feature Superset ++ 

• Minutiae 

• Dots 

• Incipient ridges 

• Protrusions 

• Discontinuities 

• Pores ... 

10 
Consistency across search record encodings 

• Examiner placed minutiae – vendor specific 

• Many “optional” features 

11 
An expectation that 

cross jurisdictional searches 

are full accuracy and 

should be available on every AFIS. 

12
Community Resilience Workshop - Data Needs for Resilience Planning and Decision-Making

Session 2: The Gap Between Current and Desired Performance of the Community’s Built 

Environment 

Justin Kates, Nashua, NH, Emergency Manager 

Justin joined the Mayor’s Cabinet in August 2011 after coming 

from his role as a Homeland Security Consultant for the Delaware 

Emergency Management Agency. In his role, Justin coordinates 

city-wide emergency response efforts by working with Federal, 

State, and other areas of municipal government in obtaining the 

necessary resources to recover after a disaster. He developed the 

Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan for the City and 

chairs the Local Emergency Planning Committee. During his time 

in Nashua, Justin was responsible for coordinating the response and 

recovery of FEMA declared disasters Tropical Storm Irene, the 

“Snowtober” Nor’easter, Superstorm Sandy, Winter Storm Nemo, 

and Winter Storm Juno. 

He is a Certified Emergency Manager (CEM) affiliated with the International Association of 

Emergency Managers (IAEM) and was awarded “NH Emergency Management Director of the 

year” in 2015. Justin is a graduate of the University of Delaware where he majored in 

Emergency Management and Public Administration. In his spare time he has taught Crisis 

Management as an Adjunct Professor at Daniel Webster College, Public Health Emergency 

Preparedness as an Adjunct Instructor at Rivier University, and numerous FEMA state-delivered 

courses for the New Hampshire Fire Academy. He is currently the Vice President of the IAEM 

Region 1 Board of Directors and the Chair of the NH Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster 

(NH VOAD). 

Abstract: 

HAZUS & NIST Community Resilience Planning Guide

Justin will talk about the selection of performance criteria and scenarios to drive HAZUS based 

on the level of risk a community is willing to accept and the resilience performance goals it 

wants to achieve, including: 

• Setting Performance Criteria Using Scenarios

o Historic Events

o Probabilistic Events

o Events Based on Current Building Code Requirements

• Determining the Consensus Level of Risk a Community is Willing to Accept

o Discussion with Key Community Stakeholders

• Limitations and Lessons Learned
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                             NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Novellus Systems, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 27, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Richard S. Hill, Chairman
of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

Date: November 11, 2003               By: /s/ Richard S. Hill
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          Richard S. Hill
                                          Chairman of the Board of
                                          Directors and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER and PRINCIPAL
       FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
          OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Everest Fund, L.P.
(the "Partnership"), for the quarter ended June 30, 2006,
as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Lamoureux, President
of Everest Asset Management, Inc., the general partner of
the Everest Fund, L.P. (the "Fund"), hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Fund.


      By:  /s/ Peter Lamoureux
         ----------------------
      Name: 	Peter Lamoureux
      Title: 	Director, President and
      		Treasurer

  November 14, 2006


							E-3
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 10.8



                                   ASSIGNMENT


         For One Hundred Ten Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($110,000.00), Concorde
Gaming Corporation (the "Assignor"), a Colorado corporation, does hereby sell,
transfer, assign and set over to BHL Capital Corporation 3290 Street, P.O. Box
505, Rapid City, South Dakota 57709, its successors and assigns, all of the
Assignor's right, title and interest in and to that certain Secured Promissory
Note dated August 1, 1989 and in the amount of $460,763.00 payable to the order
of Bruce H. Lien, or his assigns, by the Super Seer Corporation, mailing address
being P.O. Box 700, Evergreen, Colorado 80439.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Assignors have caused this Assignment to be
executed at Rapid City, South Dakota, this 23rd day of December, 1997.


                                       CONCORDE GAMING CORPORATION


                                       /s/ David L. Crabb
                                       David L. Crabb, CFO and Treasurer


Witnessed by:
              --------------------
                  (Print Name)


              --------------------
                  (Signature)

Date:
      ----------------------------
## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

August 16, 2024 SC-2024-0282 Ex parte Leroy Johnson, Jr. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In re: Leroy Johnson, Jr. v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.) (Butler Circuit Court: CV-22-4; Civil Appeals: CL-2023-0505).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was entered in this cause on August 16, 2024: Writ Denied. No Opinion. Cook, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Wise, Sellers, and Stewart, JJ., concur. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED J ESSICA RYAN , A ppellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 22

- 133 LT Case No. 2021

- 308467

- MMDB STATE O F FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decis ion filed May 9, 2023 A ppeal from t he C ounty Court for Vo lusi a County , Davi d Cromartie, Judge. E ric A. Morgan, o f

M or gan Law, P.A., Melbourne, for Appellant. A shley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allis on L. Morris, A ssistant Attorney General, Daytona B each, for Appellee. P E R CURIAM. A FFIRMED. WALLIS , EDWARDS and HARRIS , JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                        83
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                83
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         360,856
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      7,994
<OTHER-SE>                    (368,767)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  83
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              0
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              48,120
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (48,120)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (48,120)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (.06)
        


</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-40148

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Alberto Alejandro Herrera-Gonzalez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:19-CR-308-1

Before Higginbotham, Jones, and Costa, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Alberto Alejandro Herrera-Gonzalez appeals his sentence to 165 

months of imprisonment and five years of supervised release following his 

guilty-plea conviction of conspiring to possess with intent to distribute more 

than 500 grams of methamphetamine. He contends that the United States 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 20, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-40148 Document: 00515608602 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/20/2020
No. 20-40148

2

Sentencing Guidelines represent an unconstitutional delegation of 

congressional authority. While Herrera-Gonzalez acknowledges this 

argument is foreclosed by Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 361 (1989), he 

nevertheless seeks to preserve it.

The Supreme Court held in Mistretta that “Congress’ delegation of 

authority to the Sentencing Commission is sufficiently specific and detailed 

to meet constitutional requirements.” 488 U.S. at 374. Herrera-Gonzalez’s

argument is indeed foreclosed, and summary affirmance is appropriate. See 

Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969).

Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is 

GRANTED; the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time 

to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is 

AFFIRMED.

Case: 20-40148 Document: 00515608602 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/20/2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 1 AND 2 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,168
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,595
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,814)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,659
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,086
<PP&E>                                          10,912
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,654)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,084
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           134
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,384
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,602
<SALES>                                          4,873
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,873
<CGS>                                            4,916
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,916
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    75
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,149)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,149)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,149)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.38)
        

</TABLE>
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4306

AN ACT

To amend section 274A of the Immigration and

ment.verifying an individual’s eligibility for employNationality Act to improve the process for

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4306

AN ACT

To amend section 274A of the Immigration and Nationality

Act to improve the process for verifying an individual’s

eligibility for employment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4306 EH

1 SECTION 1. IMPROVEMENTS TO EMPLOYMENT

2 VERIFICATION SYSTEM.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 274A(b) of the Immigra4 tion and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1324a(b)) is

5 amended—

6 (1) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting before ‘‘A

7 person or entity has complied’’ the following: ‘‘Such

8 attestation may be manifested by either a hand-writ9 ten or an electronic signature.’’;

10 (2) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the

11 following: ‘‘Such attestation may be manifested by

12 either a hand-written or an electronic signature.’’;

13 and

14 (3) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘a paper,

15 microfiche, microfilm, or electronic version of’’ after

16 ‘‘must retain’’.

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

18 subsection (a) shall take effect on the earlier of—

19 (1) the date on which final regulations imple20 menting such amendments take effect; or
3

•HR 4306 EH

1 (2) 180 days after the date of the enactment of

2 this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives October 6,

2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 18, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

04-20096

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAVID JOSE HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(4:02-CR-342-1)

Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David Jose Hernandez appeals his sentence, following his jurytrial conviction, for importation of heroin into the United States.

See 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a), 960(a), 960(b)(3). The sentence was

imposed prior to United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005)

(finding sentencing guidelines only advisory). 

He contends first that the district court erred in denying him

a two-level reduction in his offense level for acceptance of

responsibility. See U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. There is no merit in
2

Hernandez’s contention that the pre-Booker denial of the reduction

penalized him for exercising his right to refrain from

incriminating himself on a conspiracy charge pending against him in

New York. Section 3E1.1 provides a method to grant leniency to

contrite defendants; denial of that leniency is not a penalty for

a defendant who has not accepted responsibility for his crime.

Hernandez did not accept responsibility for his crime prior to

trial. The denial of the reduction was not error. See United

States v. Angeles-Mendoza, 407 F.3d 742, 752-53 (5th Cir. 2005)

(district court’s determination under § 3E1.1 is reviewed with even

more deference than is due under clearly erroneous standard).

For the first time on appeal, Hernandez contends the district

court erred in imposing a sentence under a mandatory guideline

scheme, in violation of Booker, 125 S. Ct. at 756-57. Because he

did not raise this issue in district court, this claim is reviewed

only for plain error. See United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo, 407

F.3d 728, 733-34 (5th Cir. 2005). Hernandez makes no showing, as

required by Valenzuela-Quevedo, that the district court would

likely have sentenced him differently under an advisory sentencing

scheme. Similarly, there is no indication from the district

court’s remarks at sentencing that it would have reached a

different conclusion. Thus, Hernandez has not met his burden of

persuasion to show that the district court’s imposition of a

sentence under a mandatory guideline scheme was reversible plain
3

error. See id.; see also United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725,

732-35 (1993). 

AFFIRMED