alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

Management’s Report on InternalControl Over the Servicing andPreparation of Monthly Servicer’s Certificates

 

January 14, 2005

 

The management of Harley-Davidson Credit Corp. (the “Company”) isresponsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control overthe servicing requirements identified  inArticle V, and the reporting requirements identified in Article IX ofthe Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Servicing Agreement”), dated as of May1, 2004 between Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2004-2, as Issuer,Harley-Davidson Customer Funding Corp., as Trust Depositor, Harley-DavidsonCredit Corp., as Servicer and BNY Midwest Trust Company as Indenture Trusteefor the year ended December 31, 2004. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, weconducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over theservicing of motorcycle loan contracts in accordance with Article V of theServicing Agreement (the “servicing requirements”) and the preparation ofmonthly Servicer’s Certificates in accordance with Article IX of theServicing Agreement (the “reporting requirements”) based on the framework in “InternalControl-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of SponsoringOrganizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under theframework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework, our management concludedthat our internal control over the servicing requirements and reportingrequirements was effective as of December 31, 2004.  Our management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of our internal control over the servicing requirements andreporting requirements as of December 31, 2004 has been examined by Ernst& Young LLP, as stated in their report which is included herein.

 

Perry A. Glassgow

Vice President and TreasurerHarley-Davidson Credit Corp.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of YOU On Demand Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shane McMahon, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to YOU On Demand Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by YOU On Demand Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




May 23, 2011
/s/ Shane McMahonShane McMahon

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)




The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
10185.

#### WILLARD BAG AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY *v.*EMPIRE STATE GUANO COMPANY.

Where in a contract for the sale and purchase of goods there is no agreement as to the identity of the thing sold, an action for breach of the *35contract by refusal to accept the goods tendered is not maintainable. Identification of the thing sold is essential to a contract of sale.

Decided June 27, 1919.

Complaint; from city court of Americus—Judge Harper. October *7,*1918.

*W. A. Dodson,*for plaintiff.

*Shipp & Sheppard,*for defendant.

Stephens, J.

The Willard Bag and Manufacturing Company brought suit in the city court of Americus against the Empire State Guano Company, alleging that they entered into a written contract whereby the plaintiff sold to the defendant thirty thousand bags at the price of $78 per thousand. The contract was attached to the petition and contained a condition,—“Printing one side in black, or if red 50^ per M. more.” It is not alleged in the petition whether, the defendant ordered red or black printed bags. On the face of the contract it is shown that the red bags were higher in price. It does' not appear that an agreement had been reached between the parties as to this particular feature of the contract. No identification of the thing s'old is alleged, and as that is an essential element for the recovery for a breach of a contract of sale, the trial judge did not err in sustaining a demurrer to the petition, on the ground that it did not set out a cause of action.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles,-P. J., and Bloodiuorth, J., concur.*
Commentary section

Purpose: 

● Increase awareness of a topic area called out in the charter or critical topics nominated 

by the board. The topics are ones that address issues, challenges and opportunities 

enabling IoT, created by IoT or affected by IoT, or it may be an area where we may not 

be doing any recommendations

● Provide additional context for understanding IoT opportunities, barriers, and 

recommendations

● Provide information on topics not covered by the charter - manufacturing, AI, etc.

Desired outcomes:

● Increased understanding by federal agencies, policymakers, federal working group

● Initial awareness of complex or emerging topics

● Increased visibility of a topic area that may not have otherwise gotten the visibility 

● Inform FWG and federal decision making

● Inform on development of national IoT strategy

Length

● 1 to 2 pages (target)

Content Format

● Text

● Graphic

● Infographic?

Restrictions

● there is no preset format. Each section can follow its own format as long as it is 

consistent with the purpose and outcomes. 

● It needs to be IoT related

● Content or information presented should be easy to read

Content examples

- trends

- Impact statements

- “101” 

- Analyses

- Topic areas raised by speakers that we may not have a recommendation for

- Topics that federal working group should consider 

Commentary areas
- IoT technology (current and future)

- AI 

- Ideas

- Convergence of AI and IoT

- Applications of AI and IoT (autonomous vehicles, manufacturing, etc.)

- Consumers (appliances, TVs, wearables, etc.)

- Ideas

- child safety (from Jan speaker)

- Privacy

- Usability

- Market trends

- accessibility

- Smart homes (HVAC, security, lighting, etc.)

- Ideas

- IoT in the home

- Potential issues and challenges

- Potential opportunities

- Market trends

- Regulations

- Ideas

- Role of regulations in an area where technology is immature, changing 

rapidly, or emerging.

- Concept of regulation innovation sandboxes 

- Standards

- IoT personas

- Ideas

- Personas and what impact IoT may have

- (Small Business?)

- (Labeling?)

- (Inclusion of IoT technology and benefits to all?)

- (Emerging business and commerce models?)

- (Convergence of IT and IoT)

- (Industrial)

- (IoT and ESG)
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul Kim, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Cogent, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: April 29, 2010



/S/    PAUL
KIMPaul KimChief Financial Officer
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4294

AN ACT

To designate the annex to the E. Barrett

‘William B. Bryant Annex’ ’’.Northwest in the District of Columbia as theCourthouse located at 333 Constitution AvenuePrettyman Federal Building and United States

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4294

AN ACT

To designate the annex to the E. Barrett Prettyman Federal

Building and United States Courthouse located at 333

Constitution Avenue Northwest in the District of Columbia as the ‘William B. Bryant Annex’ ’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4294 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The annex to the E. Barrett Prettyman Federal

3 Building and United States Courthouse located at 333

4 Constitution Avenue Northwest in the District of Colum5 bia shall be known and designated as the ‘‘William B. Bry6 ant Annex’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the annex

10 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

11 to the ‘‘William B. Bryant Annex’’.

Passed the House of Representatives July 21, 2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                       THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL
                       INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  SIERRA-ROCKIES
                       CORPORATION  AND IT  SUBSIDIARIES  UNAUDITED
                       BALANCE  SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER  30, 1997 AND
                       THE RELATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE
                       MONTHS  THEN ENDED AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
                       ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL
                       STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  32,151
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               146,863
<PP&E>                                         6,062
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,286
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,327,037
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,303,273
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       17,146
<OTHER-SE>                                     689,597
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,327,037
<SALES>                                        119,372
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               132,939
<CGS>                                          104,891
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  643,972
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,492)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             193,438
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (702,978)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (702,978)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (702,978)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
HMM Reference NIST Technical Note 2205: Item 28.1 Deck Attached to Residence 

Item 28.1 Deck Attached to Residence – Ignition resistant deck material within 1 ft of house exterior can reduce risk of ignition. 

No barrier between 

combustible 

deck and 

residence

1 ft ignition resistant

barrier between deck 

and residence 

(illustrated)

Note: Selected photographs are included to illustrate each HMM hardening item. Additional vulnerabilities or hardening items may be seen in the photographs, but those are highlighted within their specific HMM item.
Installation Cautions 

Color Coding Fire Hazards · Hardening Action: Replace walking surface boards with ignition resistant deck board for first 1 ft away from residence · Applicable Conditions: Combustible deck, stairs, and landing attached to residence · Performance Goals: Prevent ignition of deck and limit flame spread to exterior wall 

e: A 

/1 

must be

1. Decking beyond first 1 ft away

from residence, and any

combustible objects on deck,are still vulnerable to ignition.

· Gray: Metal flashing· Dark Brown: ignition resistant deck boards· Light Brown: existing decking material 1 1 ft
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO ITS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                     DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                94,053
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                        170,568
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                          117,192
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     381,813
<PP&E>                            10,063,167
<DEPRECIATION>                      (425,940)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    10,019,040
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                395,593
<BONDS>                              136,121
<COMMON>                             271,961
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                         9,215,365
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      10,019,040
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           0
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        549,581
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     (14,588)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     4,052
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (539,045)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                        (539,045)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.02)

        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4227 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4227

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend to 2005 the 
alternative minimum tax relief available in 2003 and 2004 and to index 
                       such relief for inflation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2004

 Mr. Simmons (for himself, Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut, Mr. Shays, Mr. 
  Pickering, Mr. Akin, Mr. Hayworth, and Mr. Brown of South Carolina) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend to 2005 the 
alternative minimum tax relief available in 2003 and 2004 and to index 
                       such relief for inflation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited at the ``Middle-Class Alternative Minimum Tax 
Relief Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX RELIEF TO 2005.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraphs (A) and (B) of section 55(d)(1) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 are each amended by striking ``and 
2004'' and inserting ``, 2004, and 2005''.
    (b) Inflation Adjustment.--Subsection (d) of section 55 of such 
Code is amended by inserting after paragraph (3) the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(4) Inflation adjustment.--
                    ``(A) In general.--In the case of any taxable year 
                beginning in calendar year 2005, the $58,000 amount 
                contained in paragraph (1)(A) and the $40,250 amount 
                contained in paragraph (1)(B) shall each be increased 
                by an amount equal to--
                            ``(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                            ``(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment 
                        determined under section 1(f)(3) for the 
                        calendar year in which the taxable year begins, 
                        determined by substituting `2003' for `1992' in 
                        subparagraph (B) thereof.
                    ``(B) Rounding.--Any increase determined under 
                subparagraph (A) which is not a multiple of $50 shall 
                be rounded to the next lowest multiple of $50.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
#### Samuel Mitchell Estate Incorporated *et al. v.*Western and Atlantic Railroad *et al.*

Hill, J.

The deed from Samuel Mitchell to the State of Georgia, as set out in the statement of facts, properly construed, conveyed a fee-simple title to the property therein described. *Tift*v. *S., F. & W. Ry. Co.,*103 *729*Ga.*580 (30 S. E. 266). Consequently the judge did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the petition, and in dismissing the Case.

No. 6697.

January 23, 1928.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*735*Alexander, Hardwick & McLarty, Hooper <& Hooper, Alfred C. Broom,*ánd *W. B. Hollingsworth,*for plaintiffs.

*Tye, Thomson & Tye*and *Henry 0. Peeples,*for defendants.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1957

In Re: LAWRENCE E. BOWLING,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-01-46-2)

Submitted: September 6, 2001 Decided: September 11, 2001

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence E. Bowling, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence E. Bowling petitions this court for a writ of

mandamus directing the district judge to disqualify himself and

proceed no further in No. CA-01-46-2, currently pending in the

Southern District of West Virginia. Mandamus is a drastic remedy

to be used only in extraordinary situations. Kerr v. United States

Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). A judge’s involvement in

prior proceedings involving the petitioner ordinarily is not cause

for granting the writ. Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540, 551

(1994); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 827 (4th Cir. 1987). Here, we

discern no grounds for granting the requested relief. We therefore

deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

OP 23 - 0448 

DAVID WARRANT, 

Petitioner and Appellant, 

v. 

RYAN PETERSON, 

Respondent and Appellee. 

GRANT OF MOTION TO 

PROCEED WITHOUT 

PAYMENT OF FILING FEE 

Motion to proceed without payment of the filing fee in this matter is 

GRANTED. 

DATED: August 17, 2023. 

BOWEN GREENWOOD 

Clerk of the' Supreme Court 

08/17/2023

Case Number: OP 23-0448
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 229 (Friday, November 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 70897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28262]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION


Regular Board of Directors Meeting; Sunshine Act

TIME AND DATE:  3:30 p.m., Thursday, December 4, 2014.

PLACE:  NeighborWorks America--Gramlich Boardroom, 999 North Capitol 
Street NE., Washington, DC 20002.

STATUS:  Open (with the exception of Executive Session).

CONTACT PERSON:  Jeffrey Bryson, General Counsel/Secretary, (202) 760-
4101; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#abc1c9d9d2d8c4c5ebc5dc85c4d9cc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="660c04141f15090826081148091401">[email protected]</span></a>.

AGENDA: 

I. Call to Order
II. Recognition of Carol Galante
III. Approval of Minutes
IV. Executive Session: CEO Search Update
V. Executive Session: Transition Update
VI. Executive Session: Bank of America Settlement Update
VII. Executive Session: Corporate Administration Committee Update Items
VIII. Board Appointments
IX. Sustainable Homeownership Project Phase 2 Extension
X. Success Measures Data Systems Approval
XI. Board Meetings Scheduling
XII. Organizational Underwriting & Grants to Network
XIII. New Strategic Plan
XIV. Financial & Audit Update
XV. Management Updates
XIV. Adjourment


Jeffrey T. Bryson,
EVP & General Counsel/Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-28262 Filed 11-25-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7570-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7690

JAMES SMITH, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN D. WHITEHURST,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District

Judge. (CA-95-1193-AM)

Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 26, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Smith v. Whitehurst, No. CA-95-1193-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 11,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED