alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT** **32.1**




**Certification
      Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AHPC Holdings, Inc. (the
      "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Alan E. Zeffer,
      as
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Deborah J. Bills, as Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Alan E.
      Zeffer


Name: Alan
      E.
      Zeffer


Title: Chief
      Executive Officer


Date: November
      20, 2006




/s/
      Deborah J.
      Bills


Name: Deborah
      J. Bills


Title: Chief
      Financial Officer


Date: November
      20, 2006




This
      certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
      to
      the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
      purpose.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### U.S. Geological Survey

# AGENCY:

U.S. Geological Survey.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# Summary:

                        Pursuant to Public Law 106-503, the Scientific Earthquake Studies Advisory Committee (SESAC) will hold its next meeting in the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) Boardroom at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles, California. The Committee is comprised of members from academia, industry, and State government. The Committee shall advise the Director of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) on matters relating to the USGS's participation in                               ( print page 70200)                            the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program.                    

The Committee will receive reports on the status of activities of the Program and progress toward Program goals and objectives. The Committee will assess this information and provide guidance on the future undertakings and direction of the Earthquake Hazards Program. Focus topics for this meeting include a program review and strategic planning for 2016-2018.

Meetings of the Scientific Earthquake Studies Advisory Committee are open to the public.

# DATES:

January 28-29, 2015, commencing at 9:00 a.m. on the first day and adjourning at 5:00 p.m. on January 29, 2015.

# Contact:

                         Dr. William Leith, U.S. Geological Survey, MS 905, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, Virginia 20192, (703) 648-6786,                         *wleith@usgs.gov*.                    

William Leith,

Senior Science Advisor for Earthquake and Geologic Hazards.

[FR Doc. 2014-27799 Filed 11-24-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
# Authorizing the Exercise of Authority Under Public Law 85-804

# Memorandum for the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby direct the following:

                        The Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is authorized to exercise authority under Public Law 85-804, as amended (50 U.S.C. 1431*et seq.*), to the same extent and subject to the same conditions and limitations as the head of an executive department or agency listed in section 21 of Executive Order 10789 of November 14, 1958, as amended, with respect to contracts performed in Africa in support of USAID's response to the Ebola outbreak in Africa where the contractor, its employees, or subcontractors will have significant exposure to Ebola. This authority may be exercised solely for the purpose of holding harmless and indemnifying contractors with respect to claims, losses, or damage arising out of or resulting from exposure, in the course of performance of the contracts, to Ebola.                    

The USAID is exercising functions in connection with the national defense in the course of complying with its humanitarian mandate, and there is a relevant state of national emergency that authorizes use of Public Law 85-804. I deem that the authorization provided in this memorandum and actions taken pursuant to that authorization would facilitate the national defense.

This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

                        You are hereby authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

[FR Doc. 2014-27466

Billing code 6116-01
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families
 AGENCY: Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Administration for Children and Families, Department of Health and Human Services.
 ACTION: Biennial publication of allotment percentages for States under the Title IV-B subpart 1, Child Welfare Services State Grants Program (CFDA No. 93.645).
 SUMMARY: As required by section 423(c) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 623(c)), the Department is publishing the allotment percentage for each State under the Title IV-B Subpart 1, Child Welfare Services State Grants Program. Under section 423(a), the allotment percentages are one of the factors used in the computation of the Federal grants awarded under the Program.
 DATES: *Effective Dates:*
                         The allotment percentages shall be effective for Fiscal Years 2016 and 2017.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Bell, Grants Fiscal Management Specialist, Office of Grants Management, Office of Administration, Administration for Children and Families, telephone (202) 401-4611.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The allotment percentage for each State is determined on the basis of paragraphs (b) and (c) of section 423 of the Act. These figures are available on the ACF homepage on the internet: 
                    *http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/​programs/​cb/​*. The allotment percentage for each State is as follows: State
Allotment percentageAlabama
59.09Alaska
43.55Arizona
58.45Arkansas
59.17California
46.42Colorado
47.68Connecticut
32.05Delaware
49.91District of Columbia
14.17Florida
53.25Georgia
57.54Hawaii
49.44Idaho
60.03Illinois
47.77Indiana
56.92Iowa
49.95Kansas
50.53Kentucky
59.39Louisiana
54.18Maine
54.46Maryland
39.19Massachusetts
35.95Michigan
56.28Minnesota
46.65Mississippi
62.12Missouri
54.83Montana
56.05Nebraska
47.91Nevada
55.86New Hampshire
43.36New Jersey
37.68New Mexico
59.43New York
38.88North Carolina
56.69North Dakota
40.07Ohio
54.34Oklahoma
53.45Oregon
55.52Pennsylvania
48.37Rhode Island
47.52South Carolina
59.92South Dakota
48.15Tennessee
55.94Texas
51.20Utah
59.34Vermont
49.39Virginia
44.92Washington
46.94West Virginia
60.16Wisconsin
51.83Wyoming
41.14American Samoa
70.00Guam
70.00N. Mariana Islands
70.00Puerto Rico
70.00Virgin Islands
70.00
 Christopher Beach, Senior Grants Policy Specialist, Division of Grants Policy, Office of Administration.


[FR Doc. 2014-28135 Filed 11-26-14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4184-01-P
Filed 4/12/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2011 ND 73

In the Matter of J.G.

Brian D. Grosinger, 

Morton County Assistant State’s Attorney, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

J.G., Defendant and Appellant

No. 20100366

Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce B. Haskell, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Brian David Grosinger, Assistant State’s Attorney, 210 2nd Avenue Northwest, Mandan, N.D. 58554, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Kent M. Morrow, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2155, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

Matter of J.G.

No. 20100366

Per Curiam.

[¶1]J.G. appeals from a district court order denying his petition for discharge from commitment as a sexually dangerous individual under N.D.C.C. ch. 25-03.3.  J.G. argues that the order denying his petition for discharge was clearly erroneous and not supported by sufficient evidence.  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of China Broadband, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yue Pu, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Broadband, Inc. and will be retained by China Broadband, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.




November
                18, 2008
            
            
            */s/ Yue
                Pu*Yue
                Pu *(Vice Chairman and Principal*
              *Accounting
                Officer)*
10892.

#### Johnson *v.*The State.

Decided November 4, 1919.

Luke, J.

An indictment under section 442 of the Penal Code (1910), which charges the defendant with being and appearing drunk upon a certain highway, is subject to special demurrer unless it contain the further allegation that the drunkenness was caused by “the excessive use of intoxicating wines, beers, liquors, or opiates.” In this case it was error to overrule the ground of the demurrer which pointed out this specific defect. There is no merit in the other grounds of the demurrer. The court having erroneously overruled the demurrer, everything thereafter occurring was nugatory.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*

*361Indictment for misdemeanor; from Floyd superior court—Judge Wright. August 16, 1919.

*W. B. Mebane,*for plaintiff in error..

*O. H. Porter, solicitor-general,*contra.
EXHIBIT 10.2


AMENDMENT FIVE TO THE


1995 SHAREHOLDER VALUE PLAN OF


DUKE REALTY SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP


 


This
Amendment Five to the 1995 Shareholder Value Plan of Duke Realty Services
Limited Partnership, as heretofore amended (the “Plan”), is hereby adopted this
26th day of October, 2005, by Duke Realty Services Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”). 
Each capitalized term not otherwise defined herein has the meaning set forth in
the Plan.


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS,
the Partnership adopted the Plan for the purposes set forth therein; and


 


WHEREAS,
pursuant to Section 5.1 of the Plan, the Board of Directors or the Committee
has the right to amend the Plan with respect to certain matters; and


 


WHEREAS,
the Board of Directors has determined that no further awards will be made under
the Plan from and after April 27, 2005; and


 


WHEREAS,
the Committee has approved and authorized this Amendment Five to the Plan;


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority reserved to the Committee under Section
5.1 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of the date hereof,
in the following particulars:


 


1.  By deleting the last paragraph of Section 1.5
of the Plan and substituting there for the following:


 


“Effective October 30, 2002,
the maximum value of the awards payable under the Plan that would have, absent
amendment four to the Plan, been issued under the Plan in Company common shares
shall be an amount equal to the maximum number of Company common shares that
could have otherwise been issued under the Plan (which was 200,000 shares after
giving effect to the two-for-one stock split on August 27, 1997) times the per
share New York Stock Exchange closing price of such shares on the date such
shares would have otherwise been issued. 
The intent of this paragraph is to limit the value of the awards payable
under the Plan after Amendment Four to the Plan to the value of the awards
payable under the Plan before such Amendment.”


 


All
other provisions of the Plan shall remain the same.





















 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Duke Realty Services Limited Partnership, by a duly authorized
officer of its General Partner, has executed this Amendment Five to the 1995
Shareholder Value Plan of Duke Realty Services Limited Partnership this 26th
day of October, 2005.


 


	
   

  	
  DUKE
  REALTY SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:
  DUKE REALTY CORPORATION, General Partner

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /S/
  Dennis D. Oklak

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Dennis
  D. Oklak

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Chairman
  and Chief Executive Officer
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of  Section  1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned officer of MAXXAM Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does
hereby certify that:

     (a) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2006 of
the  Company,  as amended by Amendment  No. 1 thereto of even date  herewith (as
amended, the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: April 5, 2007

                                           /S/         M. EMILY MADISON
                                           -----------------------------------
                                                       M. Emily Madison
                                              Interim Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code).
```
**Exhibit 13.9**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Inmarsat Global Limited (the “Company”) forthe annual period ended December 31, 2005 (the “Periodic Report”), I, Andrew Sukawaty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Date: April 28, 2006
EX-4.1






Exhibit 4.1



FIRST AMENDMENT




FIRST AMENDMENT, dated as of November 11, 2005 (the “Amendment”), to the Rights Agreement,
dated as of February 17, 2003 (the “Rights Agreement”), by and between Compex Technologies, Inc., a
Minnesota corporation (the “Company”) and Registrar and Transfer Company (the “Rights Agent”).



WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has deemed it to be in the best interests of
the Company to amend the Rights Agreement upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth
herein to accommodate the proposed merger of Encore-Snow Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation
(“Merger Sub”) and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Encore Medical Corporation, a Delaware corporation
(“Parent”), with and into the Company pursuant to the terms of an Agreement and Plan of Merger
proposed to be entered into among the Company, Parent and Merger Sub (the “Merger”); and



WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Rights Agreement, the Company has delivered an officer’s
certificate to the Rights Agent which states that the proposed amendment has been approved by a
majority of the Board of Directors of the Company and is in compliance with the terms of Section 17
of the Rights Agreement regarding supplements and amendments.



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual agreements hereinafter set forth,
the Company and the Rights Agent agree to amend the Rights Agreement as follows:



1. Subject to the terms of paragraph 2 below, the definition of “Exempt Person” contained in
Section 1 of the Rights Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:




“Exempt Person” shall mean (i) any wholly-owned Subsidiary of the Company, (ii) any
employee benefit plan of the Company or of a Subsidiary of the Company, (iii) any Person
holding Voting Shares for or pursuant to the terms of any such employee benefit plan, and
(iv) Encore-Snow Acquisition Corp., Encore Medical Corporation, and their respective
Associates and Affiliates.



2. If the Merger shall not have been consummated by April 30, 2006, the provisions of this
Amendment shall be null and void and of no further force and effect.



[signature page follows]




1




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above
written.



REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER COMPANY




By/s/ William P. Tatler

Its Vice President




COMPEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.




By:/s/ Dan Gladney _______

Its: Chairman and CEO





2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE 1996 ORYX ENERGY COMPANY
ANNUAL REPORT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               9
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      232
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          3
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   250
<PP&E>                                            5354
<DEPRECIATION>                                    3727
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1935
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              385
<BONDS>                                           1183
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           124
<OTHER-SE>                                       (161)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1935
<SALES>                                           1168
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1147
<CGS>                                              675
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      675
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   114
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  93
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    265
<INCOME-TAX>                                       102
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                163
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       163
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.56<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.55
<FN>
<F1>(EPS-PRIMARY) DENOTES BASIC EPS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>