alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

ABC CORPORATION I, 

ABC CORPORATION II, 

Plaintiffs,

v. 

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND 

UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS 

IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:20-cv-4806

Judge Thomas M. Durkin

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole

DECLARATION OF CHANDLER E. STURM

I, Chandler E. Sturm, hereby declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney at Tarter, Krinsky & Drogin LLP, counsel of record for Plaintiffs 

Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. (“Chic”) and Unicorn Global, Inc. (“Unicorn”, 

and collectively with Chic, “Plaintiffs”).

2. I make this Declaration in support of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion 

to Strike Plaintiffs’ Expert Report. 

3. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the Expert Report of Paul 

Hatch served on Defendants during expert discovery on August 15, 2022.

4. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the Paul Hatch Rebuttal 

Report to Jim Gandy Expert Report served on Defendants during expert discovery on September 

12, 2022. 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 649 Filed: 02/22/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:16569
2

5. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of the Paul Hatch Rebuttal 

Report to Lance Rake Expert Report served on Defendants during expert discovery on September 

12, 2022.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the

foregoing is true and correct.

Dated: February 22, 2023 By: ______________________________

New York, New York Chandler E. Sturm 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 649 Filed: 02/22/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:16570
<PAGE>   1






             FIRST COMMUNITY BANKING SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                EXHIBIT 11 - COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               1997            1996
                                                               ----            ----
<S>                                                          <C>             <C>     
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 
----------------------------------- 

Net Income                                                   $401,247        $307,618
                                                             ========        ========

Weighted average of common shares outstanding                 646,062         643,062

Add Common Stock equivalents determined using the
"Treasury Stock" method representing shares issuable
upon exercise of director and employee stock options
using annual average market price                              48,145          39,784
                                                             --------        --------
Weighted average number of shares used in calculation
of primary earnings per share                                 694,207         682,846
                                                             ========        ========
Primary earnings per share                                   $   0.58        $   0.45
                                                             ========        ========
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
---------------------------------

Net Income                                                   $754,892        $580,948
                                                             ========        ========

Weighted average of common shares outstanding                 646,062         643,062

Add  Common Stock equivalents determined using the
"Treasury Stock" method representing shares issuable
upon exercise of director and employee stock options
annual average market price                                    50,248          40,243
                                                             --------        --------
Weighted average number of shares used in calculation
of primary earnings per share                                 696,310         683,305
                                                             ========        ========

Primary earnings per share                                   $   1.08        $   0.85
                                                             ========        ========
</TABLE>


                                       14
Exhibit 13.2
 CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B)  UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Company Report
 (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company as of December 31, 2010 and results of operations of
the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010.
 /s/ Mike DoyleName:
    Mike DoyleTitle:
    Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    June 29, 2011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO THE CONTINUING
LEGAL EDUCATION BOARD :

:

:

:

: No. 863

SUPREME COURT RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 21 st day of December , 2020, Tuan M. Samahon

, Esquire, Bucks

County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Continuing Legal Education Board for a

term of three years, commencing January 1, 2021

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,772,366
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,189,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,950,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 13,221,351
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      13,221,351
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        13,221,351
<LOANS>                                     22,318,269
<ALLOWANCE>                                    249,186
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,955,263
<DEPOSITS>                                  37,665,709
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,310,325
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            287,157
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,075,305
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,616,767
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              41,955,263
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                514,878
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              228,487
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                30,941
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               774,305
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             271,316
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             297,346
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          476,959
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   11,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                390,591
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                166,700
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     110,022
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    110,02
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .76
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Ex. B

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 110-2 Filed: 08/16/22 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:2809
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 110-2 Filed: 08/16/22 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:2810
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 110-2 Filed: 08/16/22 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:2811
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 110-2 Filed: 08/16/22 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:2812
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 for the
Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan of American Industrial Properties
REIT of our report dated August 5, 1997 with  respect to the Historical Summary
of Gross Income and Direct Operating Expenses of Commerce Center for the year
ended May 31, 1997.



                              /s/ Easley, Endres, Parkhill & Brackendorff, P.C.
                                  EASLEY, ENDRES, PARKHILL & BRACKENDORFF, P.C.


Houston, Texas
March 20, 1998
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-40834

Summary Calendar

____________

Raymond Garcia Carmona, Jr., 

Petitioner—Appellant,

versus

Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Beaumont Medium, 

Respondent—Appellee.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:22-CV-184

______________________________

Before Dennis, Elrod, and Willett, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Raymond Garcia Carmona, Jr., a federal inmate, appeals the dismissal 

of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, which challenged the sentence set forth in 

his amended judgment for his convictions for conspiracy to distribute and 

possess with intent to distribute less than 50 kilograms of marijuana and 

distribution and possession with intent to distribute less than 50 kilograms of 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 7, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-40834 Document: 00516812701 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/07/2023
No. 22-40834

2

marijuana. The district court dismissed Carmona’s § 2241 petition after 

determining that Carmona’s challenge to his sentence should properly be 

brought as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, Carmona failed to show that his § 2241 

petition qualified under the § 2255 savings clause, the district court lacked 

jurisdiction to entertain a § 2255 motion from Carmona because he was 

convicted in a different district, and his § 2241 petition was barred by the 

waiver provision in his plea agreement.

On appeal, Carmona argues that the district court committed a 

structural error by changing the imprisonment terms in the amended 

judgment to run consecutively rather than concurrently and that the resulting 

sentence violated the terms of his plea agreement. We review the district 

court’s factual findings for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo. 

Christopher v. Miles, 342 F.3d 378, 381 (5th Cir. 2003). Section 2255’s savings 

clause permits prisoners to challenge the validity of their convictions under 

§ 2241 if they show that § 2255’s remedy “is inadequate or ineffective.” 28 

U.S.C. § 2255(e); see also Reyes-Requena v. United States, 243 F.3d 893, 901 

(5th Cir. 2001). The savings clause applies if the petitioner’s claim (1) “is 

based on a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision which establishes 

that the petitioner may have been convicted of a nonexistent offense” and 

(2) “was foreclosed by circuit law at the time when the claim should have 

been raised in the petitioner’s trial, appeal, or first § 2255 motion.” ReyesRequena, 243 F.3d at 904. The district court correctly concluded that 

Carmona does not meet this test. The district court also lacked jurisdiction 

to construe Carmona’s § 2241 petition as a § 2255 motion because Carmona 

was sentenced in the Northern District of Texas. See United States v. Parker, 

927 F.3d 374, 378-79 (5th Cir. 2019); Pack v. Yusuff, 218 F.3d 448, 451 (5th 

Cir. 2000).

AFFIRMED.

Case: 22-40834 Document: 00516812701 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/07/2023
EXHIBIT 31.1
IEA Income Fund IX, L.P.
Rule 13a-14 CERTIFICATION
     I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IEA Income FundIX, L.P. (the “Registrant”);
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), theGeneral Partner of the Registrant, and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:
          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; and
          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, based on ourevaluation; and
          (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of Registrant’s Board ofDirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: November 12, 2004 /s/ DENNIS J TIETZDennis J TietzPresident of CCC(Chief Executive Officer)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.7

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this registration statement of our report dated May 14, 1997, on
the financial statements of Ameron Broadcasting, Inc. included in the Capstar
Broadcasting Corporation Prospectus dated May 26, 1998.



/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
July 22, 1998
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





I, Lorie M. Guerrera, Chief Accounting Officer of Cordia Corporation (the Registrant) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period September 30, 2005 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report):

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By:/s/ Lorie M. Guerrera



Lorie M. Guerrera

Chief Accounting Officer



November 14, 2005









*

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cordia Corporation and will be retained by Cordia Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CHRISTINE SCHULTE,

Appellant,

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1959

[February 2, 2022]

Non-final appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial 

Circuit, Palm Beach County; Glenn D. Kelley, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502015CA011580.

Margery E. Golant of Margery E. Golant, P.A., Boca Raton, for 

appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse an order denying a motion to quash service of process.

The trial court made the factual finding that appellant was not properly 

served, but ruled that appellant had waived any personal jurisdictional 

challenge by her participation in the lawsuit. Nothing appellant filed in 

the lawsuit amounted to a request for affirmative relief. See Modway, Inc. 

v. OJ Com., LLC, 46 Fla. L. Weekly D2532, 2021 WL 5499826, at *2 (Fla. 

4th DCA Nov. 24, 2021) (stating that “affirmative relief” is “relief for which 

a defendant might maintain an action independently of plaintiff’s claim 

and on which he might proceed to recovery, although plaintiff abandoned 

his cause of action or failed to establish it”) (citation omitted); accord

Heineken v. Heineken, 683 So. 2d 194, 197 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). The trial 

court relied on Thane v. Rose Acceptance, Inc., 315 So. 3d 760 (Fla. 4th

DCA 2021), but we conclude that Thane is distinguishable. Thane involved 

a request to reschedule, which acknowledges jurisdiction, unlike 

appellant’s motion in this case. 

Reversed.
2

GROSS, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4158

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 20, 2004

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, 

and Transportation 

AN ACT

To provide for the conveyance to the Government of Mexico 

of a decommissioned National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration ship, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 4158 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF NOAA VESSEL WHITING. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Commerce shall 

3 convey to the Government of Mexico, without consider4 ation, all right, title, and interest of the United States in 

5 and to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administra6 tion vessel WHITING—

7 (1) for use as a hydrographic survey platform 

8 in support of activities of the United States-Mexico 

9 Charting Advisors Committee; and 

10 (2) to enhance coordination and cooperation be11 tween the United States and Mexico regarding hy12 drographic surveying and nautical charting activities 

13 in the border waters of both countries in the Gulf 

14 of Mexico and in the Pacific Ocean. 

15 (b) OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.—The Govern16 ment of the United States shall not be responsible or liable 

17 for any remediation, maintenance, or operation of a vessel 

18 conveyed under this section after the date of the delivery 

19 of the vessel to the Government of Mexico. 

20 (c) DEADLINE.—The Secretary shall seek to complete 

21 the conveyance by as soon as practicable after the date 

22 of the enactment of this Act. 

23 (d) DELIVERY OF VESSEL.—The Secretary shall de24 liver the vessel WHITING pursuant to this section at the 
3

HR 4158 RFS 

1 vessel’s homeport location of Norfolk, Virginia, at no addi2 tional cost to the United States.

Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
On April 24, 2019, OMB issued a memorandum to reinforce, clarify, and interpret agency 

responsibilities, M-19-15, Improving Implementation of the Information Quality Act. NIST is 

committed to complying with the following updates contained in M-19-15, including 

Implementation Update 4.1, which provides that agencies will not take more than 120 days to 

respond to a request for correction (RFC) without the concurrence of the party that made the 

request.

Implementation Update 1.1: Drawing on experience implementing the Guidelines, agencies 

should revisit the parameters for identifying “influential information.” Agencies should provide 

specific guidance to program managers for determining the amount and type of predissemination review necessary. Agencies should identify specific types of information the 

agency produces that are “influential” and should provide a rigorous process for determining 

whether types of information not specifically listed by the guidelines qualify as “influential.”

Implementation Update 4.1: Agencies should revise their procedures to reflect more realistic 

timelines for RFCs. Revised procedures should, at minimum, provide that agencies will not take 

more than 120 days to respond to an RFC without the concurrence of the party that requested 

the request for correction.

Implementation Update 4.2: In its response to an RFC, agencies should not opine on the 

requestor’s or the agency’s policy position.

Implementation Update 4.3: The agency response should contain a point-by-point response to 

any data quality arguments contained in the RFC and should refer to a peer review that directly 

considered the issue being raised, if available.

Implementation Update 4.4: Agencies should share draft responses to RFCs and appeals with 

OMB prior to release to the requestor for assessment of compliance with the above norms.

·

Implementation Update 4.5: To ensure the integrity of the appeals process, agencies should 

ensure that those individuals reviewing and responding to the appeals request were not involved 

in the review and initial response to the RFC.

NIST believes that it does not currently produce or sponsor the distribution of influential 

scientific information (including highly influential scientific assessments) within the definitions 

promulgated by OMB. As a result, at this time NIST has no agenda of forthcoming influential 

scientific disseminations to post on its website in accordance with OMB's Information Quality 

Bulletin for Peer Review.