alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4299 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

410 South Jackson Road in Edinburg, Texas, as the ‘‘Dr. Miguel A. 

Nevarez Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2004 

Mr. HINOJOSA (for himself, Mr. LAMPSON, Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Mr. GREEN of 

Texas, Mr. FROST, Mr. PAUL, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. REYES, Mr. ORTIZ, 

Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, 

Mr. BELL, Mr. EDWARDS, Mr. STENHOLM, Mr. SANDLIN, Mr. DOGGETT, 

Mr. TURNER of Texas, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. 

HENSARLING, Mr. HALL, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. CARTER, Mr. 

SMITH of Texas, Ms. GRANGER, Mr. THORNBERRY, Mr. DELAY, Mr. 

NEUGEBAUER, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. BONILLA, and 

Mr. BURGESS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 410 South Jackson Road in Edinburg, Texas, 

as the ‘‘Dr. Miguel A. Nevarez Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4299 IH 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF DR. MIGUEL A. NEVA ́ REZ 

2 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 410 South Jackson Road in Ed5 inburg, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Dr. 

6 Miguel A. Neva ́rez Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Dr. Miguel A Neva ́rez 

11 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ
11061.

#### Griffin *v.*The State.

Decided January 6, 1920.

Conviction of “unlawful shooting;” from Putnam superior court —Judge Park. October 23, 1919.

*8. T. Wingfield, R. C. Jenldns,*for plaintiff in error.

*Doyle Campbell, solicitor-general, A. G. Foster, solicitor,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

1. “While in every criminal case, where it is sought to show the guilt of the defendant by circumstantial evidence alone, the jury should be instructed and cautioned that he should not be convicted on circumstantial evidence, unless the proven facts exclude every possible reasonable hypothesis save the guilt of the defendant, still it is immaterial what language is employed to convey this instruction. If all possible hypotheses arising from the circumstantial evidence which are favorable to the defendant be presented in concrete statement to the jury, and the jury are told that if they believe any one of these hypotheses the defendant should be acquitted, the principal above referred to would be sufficiently presented.” *Mangum v. State,*5 *Ga. App.*445 (2) (63 S. E. 543). Under this rule and the facts of the instant case (conceding that the defendant’s conviction depended entirely upon circumstantial evidence), the charge of the court sufficiently presented to the jury the law of circumstantial evidence.

2. The 2d special ground of the motion for a new trial, not having been referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, is treated as abandoned.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
Dr. James K. Olthoff

Acting Associate Director for Laboratory Programs 

NIST and Quantum Science

June 5, 2018
Programmatic Priorities

Advanced 

Manufacturing Cybersecurity Disaster Resilience

Documentary 

Standards

Technology 

Transfer

Engineering 

Biology

Internet of 

Things

Quantum 

Science

Artificial 

Intelligence

© Matt DeLorme

Measurement 

Dissemination
Quantum Science 

as Strategic Priority

Critical to metrology

Critical to national 

priorities

Unique NIST capabilities
Why Quantum Now?

1900’s

Understanding quantum 

science leads to lasers, 

transistors, 

semiconductors

Control and 

measurement of 

quantum states will 

lead to new 

technologies

Today 

In today’s landscape, quantum science is essential to our 

national security and economic health 

Recent Headlines from the Economist, Wired, Reuters, MIT Technology Review, EU
Why NIST?

NIST has a world-leading capability and reputation in quantum

Excellence in quantum is critical to NIST’s metrology mission

Quantum supremacy impossible without measurements

Credit: J. Consoli, University of Maryland
NIST has long history in Quantum

NIST’s work in atomic 

clocks led way for 

quantum information 

science
Quantum Across NIST

Laboratories across NIST are leading and preparing for the 

second quantum revolution through basic research, 

applied research and engineering, and measurement 

mission delivery.

Quantum-based 

Random Number 

Generator

Post-Quantum 

Cryptography

Quantum photonics Stable Atomic 

Clocks

©Geoffrey Wheeler

Quantum Simulators
Extending Quantum Capabilities
NIST Quantum Science Strategic Vision

Quantum SI Quantum 

Engineering

Foundational 

Quantum 

Metrology

NIST will accelerate the application of quantum information science, leverage 

advances in quantum technology for standards and measurements, and provide U.S. 

leadership in fundamental research into quantum phenomena to establish the 

foundation for the future quantum infrastructure of the U.S.
Speakers Jacob Taylor

Assistant Director for Quantum 

Information Science, White House Office 

of Science and Technology Policy

Carl Williams

Acting Director, NIST Physical 

Measurement Laboratory

Gretchen Campbell

Co-Director, Joint Quantum Institute
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certification of Chief ExecutiveOfficerPursuant to Rules 13A-14 and 15D-14Of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

 

I, Thomas S. Bednarik,President and Chief Executive Officer of Time America, Inc. (the “Company”),certify that:

 

(1)           I have reviewed this Quarterly Reporton Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the “Report”);

 

(2)           Based on my knowledge, the Reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by the Report; and

 

(3)           Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in the Report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company as of, and for, the periods represented in theReport.

 

(4)           The Company’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the Company and have:

 

(a)           designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiary, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this Report is being prepared;

 

(b)           evaluated theeffectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin the Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by the Reportbased on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           disclosed in theReport any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

(5)           The Company’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and to the auditcommittee of the board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)           all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

(b)           any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Dated:    May 14, 2004

 
| By:    | /s/ Thomas S. Bednarik                |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Thomas S. Bednarik                    |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
AMENDMENT TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 THE PRINCETON REVIEW, INC.


          This AMENDMENT to the Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”), dated June 7, 2004, between Stephen Melvin (“Melvin”) and The Princeton Review, Inc. (“TPR”), is entered into by Melvin and TPR.


          WHEREAS, TPR and Melvin desire to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth herein;


          NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:


          1.          Section 1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting such Section in its entirety and replacing it with the following:


                       “1.    Job Description:  Melvin shall serve as the Executive Vice President of Finance of TPR, performing such duties as are reasonable and customary for such position within a business of this type, and shall report directly to TPR’s Chief Financial Officer.”


          2.          In the event of termination of Melvin’s employment with TPR for any reason, those options to purchase shares of TPR’s common stock granted by TPR to Melvin that have vested as of the date of such termination shall remain exercisable by Melvin until the expiration date set forth on the stock option grant agreement governing such option. To the extent necessary, each stock option grant agreement from TPR to Melvin is hereby amended to reflect such modifications.


          3.          All other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect according to their terms.

Agreed to September 12, 2005

	
  /s/ John Katzman
  	
   
  	
  /s/ Stephen Melvin
  
	
  


  	
   
  	
  


  
	
  John Katzman
  	
   
  	
  Stephen Melvin
  
	
  Chief Executive Officer, TPR
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of China Broadband, Inc. (the "Company")
        on
        Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yue Pu, Principal
        Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        China Broadband, Inc. and will be retained by China Broadband, Inc. and
        furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
  May
                  20, 2008
              By:
              */s/
                      Yue Pu*Yue
                      Pu*(Vice
                      Chairman Principal Accounting
                      Officer)*
#### Allen Moberly *v.*W. E. Moberly.

Evidence — Confession—Constructive Notice.

Nothing can he taken as confessed against a party who is before the court, simply upon constructive notice.

Interest — Amount of.

Where plaintiff fails to offer evidence as te the place where the notes were executed', it is error to adjudge 10 per cent, interest on the debts.

■APPEAL PROM MADISON CIRCUIT COURT.

December 10, 1872.

*Scott & Little, for appellant.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

There is no proof in the record showing that the notes sued on were executed in the state of Missouri. Nor is there anything showing that the court heard proof upon any of the questions of fact upon which appellee’s right to have payment for interest pn his debts at the rate of ten per cent, per annum depended.

As appellant was not before the court except upon constructive service, nothing could be taken for confessed against him', and as the appellee failed to offer testimony as to the place where the notes were executed, it was error to adjudge him ten per cent, interest on his debts. For this reason the judgment must be reversed. As the prosecution of this appeal operates as an appearance by appellant, the remaining questions raised by him can be settled in the court below upon the return of the cause which is remanded for further proper proceedings.

-, *for appellee.*
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                       ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2004-12CB
             MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-12CB


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

/s/ Joseph M. Candelario                       Dated: March 29, 2005
------------------------


JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Mark Wong                                  Dated: March 29, 2005
-------------

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A
(the "Report") of Lindsay Manufacturing Co. (the "Company") for the quarter
ended November 30, 2002, I, Richard W. Parod, Chief Executive officer of the
Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

          /s/ RICHARD W. PAROD
          -------------------------
          President and Chief Executive Officer
          Richard W. Parod

          October 10, 2003

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






                                       24
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 23.4


              Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting a part of this Registration Statement on Form S-8 of our report
dated March 12, 1998, relating to the consolidated financial statements and
schedules of Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. (the "Company") appearing
in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1997.


                                   /s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

                                   BDO Seidman, LLP


Dallas, Texas
April 3, 1998
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHRN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

WINDY CITY LIMOUSINE COMPANY, LLC, a )

limited liability company, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Case No. 1:20-cv-4901

v. )

)

CINCINNATI FINANCIAL CORPORATION, )

a corporation, THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE ) Hon. Andrea R. Wood

COMPANY, a stock insurance company, )

THE CINCINNATI CASUALTY COMPANY, )

a stock insurance company, THE CINCINNATI )

INDEMNITY COMPANY, a stock insurance )

Company, and VALLEY COMPANIES, INC., )

a corporation, )

)

Defendants. )

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5) and 12(b)(6), Defendants hereby 

move the Court to dismiss plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF Doc. # 1-1) for ineffective service and, 

additionally, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. A Memorandum in 

Support of this Motion follows. 

Dated: September 10, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Michael P. Baniak____________

Brian M. Reid

Michael P. Baniak 

Litchfield Cavo, LLP

303 W. Madison, Suite 300

Chicago, IL 60606

Tel.: (312) 781-6617 (Reid)

Tel.: (312) 781-6596 (Baniak)

Case: 1:20-cv-04901 Document #: 11 Filed: 09/10/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:200
Fax.: (312) 781-6630

Reid@LitchfieldCavo.com

Baniak@LitchfieldCavo.com

Attorneys for Defendants Cincinnati Financial 

Corporation, The Cincinnati Insurance Company, 

The Cincinnati Casualty Company, and The 

Cincinnati Indemnity Company

Case: 1:20-cv-04901 Document #: 11 Filed: 09/10/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:201
Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on September 10, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing Motion to 

Dismiss with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of 

such filing to all parties of record. 

/s/ Michael P. Baniak______________

Case: 1:20-cv-04901 Document #: 11 Filed: 09/10/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:202
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4299 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4299

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   410 South Jackson Road in Edinburg, Texas, as the ``Dr. Miguel A. 
                     Nevarez Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 410 
South Jackson Road in Edinburg, Texas, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Dr. Miguel A. Nevarez Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dr. Miguel A. Nevarez Post 
Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SIERRA-
ROCKIES CORPORATION AND IT SUBSIDIARIES UNAUDITED BALANCE SHEET
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND THE RELATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE
NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO 
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S.
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                     jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       sep-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                    1
<CASH>                             1,867 
<SECURITIES>                       0   
<RECEIVABLES>                      150,000 
<ALLOWANCES>                       0   
<INVENTORY>                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   191,218 
<PP&E>                             2,157,028 
<DEPRECIATION>                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     2,834,463 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              1,451,298 
<BONDS>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<COMMON>                           5,364,222 
<OTHER-SE>                         (4,242,394)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       2,834,463 
<SALES>                            150,000 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   150,000 
<CGS>                              150,000 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      150,000 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   486,066 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   565,500 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 170,134 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (1,120,079)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (1,120,079)
<DISCONTINUED>                     763,662
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0   
<NET-INCOME>                       (356,417)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (0.02)
        

</TABLE>