DRAFT - Environmental Monitoring Recommendations- for discussion only

1

Key Recommendation 9.0: Environmental Monitoring

[Key recommendation text is still being developed.]

Supplemental Recommendation 9.1: The federal government should establish or 

encourage IoT environmental data repositories in support of open, available data. Promoting the 

open availability of data would promote research, improve transparency, and encourage 

proactive improvement by industry participants. As described in other recommendations 

throughout this report, improved interoperability and competitiveness will help benefit all IoT 

adopters, and an open model for shared and consistent data will help take strides toward those 

objectives.

Supplemental Recommendation 9.2: The federal government should facilitate and support 

the research, development and deployment of low cost Air Quality sensors. (Could we expand 

to additional types of monitoring?)

The Board observed that there is a need to shift from expensive (i.e., highly sensitive regulatory 

grade) sensors that limit deployment by organizations and municipalities. While such sensors 

are vital for particular monitoring purposes, large scale deployment of these types of monitoring 

equipment would be expensive and difficult.

Encouraging development and implementation of local, scalable air quality monitoring would 

support a variety of use cases, including:

• Increasing public awareness of air quality conditions;

• Informing environment and public policy, including through real time testing and 

demonstration of policy impacts;

• Environmental justice work;

• Supplementing regulatory grade sensing with IoT commercial sensors;

• Public health research;

• Construction site emissions monitoring; and,

• Rapid or emergency air quality monitoring for particular circumstances.

Currently, regulatory monitoring is often limited to a few pollutants; the government can 

encourage expanded coverage of other emerging chemicals of concern (including greenhouse 

gasses) in monitoring and sensing systems.

Agencies should encourage automated and consistent measurement and can facilitate research 

in low-cost sensing technologies for criterial pollutants, such as optical particle scanning for 

particulate matter and M0x elements for gases and detection of other emerging chemicals of 

concern.

The government should facilitate the expansion of wireless connectivity to support remote 

monitoring and sensing in areas not serviced by traditional connectivity. This recommendation 

supports (and is supported by) those described in Recommendation 4.
DRAFT - Environmental Monitoring Recommendations- for discussion only

2 

Previous Draft material for 9.0: Environmental Monitoring

Recommendation 1: The federal government should facilitate and support the 

development and adoption of low cost AQ monitoring sensing systems.. 

Description: 

IoT sensing allows for the effortless collection of data from multiple devices and technical

innovation in IoT has emerged in research communities worldwide, which together provide new

opportunities for low-cost, high resolution, environmental monitoring. However, wider

implementation of such devices in the United States will require the approval and

encouragement of the federal government. 

Justification:

● Regulatory grade sensors are expensive, limiting the number that can be deployed.

Their purpose is specific to looking at broad air quality of an area and compare against

EPA levels to protect health and welfare (epidemiological reasons). This limits the

scaling of AQ monitors

● Gap in local (community) scalable air quality monitoring to support a variety of use

cases, including

● Increasing public awareness of AQ 

● Informing environment and public policy; real time testing of policy impacts

● Environmental justice work

● Supplementing regulatory grade sensing with com sensors 

● Public health research

● Construction site emissions monitoring

● Rapid or emergency AQ monitoring

Implementation Considerations:

● Facilitate research in low-cost sensing technologies for criterial pollutants, such optical

particle scanning for particulate matter and M0x elements for gases, as well as detection

of emerging pollutants of concern.

● Facility the use of space at federal infrastructure (e.g., post office buildings) and federal

assets (e.g., post office delivery vehicles) for locating academic and private sector air

quality monitors. 

● Facilitate and support research and a program in correlating regulatory grade data with

low cost AQ data

○ Push state/city to 

● Facilitate the expansion of wireless connectivity to support remote monitoring and

sensing in areas not serviced by traditional connectivity (TV white space, satellite, etc.)

 

Potential implementation barriers:
DRAFT - Environmental Monitoring Recommendations- for discussion only

3 

● Different federal agencies (e.g., EPA, BLM, US Forestry Service) have adopted IoT

monitors and different ways and can have different protocols for interpreting the same

raw data. Consistent standards for interpreting IoT monitoring data will be needed

● Federal policies take time to be implemented at a state and local level. Funding must

accompany IT device related policy statements.

Possible participating agencies:

● The EPA; DoC, FCC, NIST.

Recommendation 2: The federal government should consider establishing data 

repositories for privately collected data 

Description:

The growth in IoT devices portends a rapid deployment of devices. These devices have the

potential to provide a strong public good, however without transparency privacy and data

ownership issues may arise. Additionally, the use of different technologies and methodologies

across different platforms may result in conflicting measurements, fostering misinterpretation

and reducing public confidence in the monitoring process.

Justification:

● Federal data repositories provide transparency and the opportunity to community 

reseach to conduct analysis on the data far beyond the capabilities of a single federal 

agency 

Implementation Considerations:

● Consider DOE EIA sharing of power plant data as a possible implementation template

Potential implementation barriers:

● Data should be directly from devices to minimize any differences in post processing

Possible participating agencies:

● The EPA, DOE, DoC, NIST

Recommendation 3: The federal government should consider establishing stockpile 

reserves of IoT monitoring equipment for quick short-terms deployment during 

emergency and catastrophic event scenarios

Description:
DRAFT - Environmental Monitoring Recommendations- for discussion only

4 

IoT devices are being develop for mid to long term monitoring of various environment

conditions, but the low barriers to cost and deployment create new opportunities to use IoT

monitors for assessing environmental conditions after emergency events, such as after fires,

floods, industrial accidents.

Justification:

● IoT device deployment can help quickly assess safety concerns through quick 

deployment with relatively minimal time and effort 

Implementation Considerations:

● Consider sharing stockpile across agencies

● IoT devices should be updatable during storage for quick delopyment

Potential implementation barriers:

● Purchase, storage, and use represent new agency costs

Possible participating agencies:

● The EPA, DHS, FEMA

Recommendation 3: Implement a Nationwide IoT-based Water Monitoring Infrastructure

Description: 

• Develop a comprehensive, nationwide water monitoring infrastructure that leverages IoT 

technology for real-time, accurate, and cost-effective water quality and quantity data 

collection. This infrastructure should support data-driven decision-making, address the 

challenges of water scarcity, contamination, and climate change, and integrate with 

existing NOAA water models for enhanced forecasting and management capabilities.

Justification:

• Current water monitoring systems are often fragmented, inefficient, and insufficient to 

address the growing challenges of water management.

• IoT technology enables real-time, remote, and continuous data collection, allowing for 

proactive responses to water-related issues.

• Integration with NOAA water models can enhance forecasting and management 

capabilities, leading to more effective water resource planning and allocation.

• Efficient water management is crucial for consumption, agriculture, and industry, 

ultimately contributing to environmental and economic sustainability.

Implementation Considerations:
DRAFT - Environmental Monitoring Recommendations- for discussion only

5 

• Develop a standardized, nationwide framework for water monitoring, including protocols 

for data collection, transmission, storage, and analysis.

• Encourage the adoption of open data standards and APIs to ensure interoperability 

among different IoT devices, platforms, and NOAA water models.

• Allocate resources for research and development of advanced IoT sensors, data 

analytics tools, and communication networks that can seamlessly integrate with NOAA's 

existing water modeling systems.

• Support pilot projects that demonstrate the potential of IoT in water monitoring and 

management, as well as the successful integration with NOAA water models, and scale 

up successful models through federal and state programs, grants, and incentives.

Potential Implementation Barriers:

• Diverse geographical, environmental, and regulatory factors may present challenges in 

the implementation of a nationwide water monitoring infrastructure.

• Ensuring data privacy and security in IoT-based systems may require significant 

investments in cybersecurity measures.

• Achieving widespread adoption and integration of IoT-based water monitoring systems 

with NOAA water models may be met with resistance from stakeholders who are 

accustomed to traditional monitoring methods.

Possible Participating Agencies:

• Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration (NOAA), United States Geological Survey (USGS), Department of 

Agriculture (USDA), Department of Energy (DOE), and National Institute of Standards 

and Technology (NIST).

Recommendation 4: Utilize IoT Technologies to Estimate and Mitigate Carbon Emissions 

in Farms 

Description:

Promote the adoption of IoT-based solutions in the agricultural sector to accurately 

estimate and manage carbon emissions in farms. By leveraging IoT technologies in 

conjunction with other methods, farmers can monitor greenhouse gas emissions, 

implement effective mitigation strategies, and contribute to national and global efforts to 

reduce carbon emissions.

Justification:

• Agriculture is a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, including carbon 

dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide, which contribute to climate change.

• Accurate monitoring and estimation of carbon emissions in farms can help identify 

emission hotspots and develop targeted mitigation strategies.
DRAFT - Environmental Monitoring Recommendations- for discussion only

6 

• IoT technologies enable real-time, remote, and continuous data collection, allowing 

farmers to manage emissions more effectively and sustainably.

• Combining IoT-based monitoring with other estimation methods can improve the 

accuracy and reliability of emissions data.

Implementation Considerations:

• Develop a standardized framework for the integration of IoT technologies in agricultural 

carbon emissions monitoring, including protocols for data collection, transmission, 

storage, and analysis.

• Encourage research and development of advanced IoT sensors and data analytics tools 

specifically designed for estimating greenhouse gas emissions in farms.

• Support pilot projects that demonstrate the potential of IoT in estimating and mitigating 

carbon emissions in the agricultural sector, and scale up successful models through 

federal and state programs, grants, and incentives.

• Provide training and technical assistance to farmers and other stakeholders in the 

implementation and maintenance of IoT-based carbon emissions monitoring systems.

• Facilitate collaboration and data sharing among farmers, researchers, and policymakers 

to promote informed decision-making and the development of best practices for 

emissions reduction.

Potential Implementation Barriers:

• The diverse nature of agricultural practices and environmental conditions may 

present challenges in the development and implementation of standardized IoTbased solutions for carbon emissions monitoring.

• Achieving widespread adoption of IoT technologies in the agricultural sector may be 

met with resistance from stakeholders who are accustomed to traditional monitoring 

methods.

• Ensuring data privacy and security in IoT-based systems may require significant 

investments in cybersecurity measures.

Possible Participating Agencies:

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Department of Energy (DOE), and 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).