alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 24, 2010 

0317 

Order 

 

March 24, 2010 

140071 

THOMAS JANSON, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140071 

 COA: 284607 

Wayne CC: 06-622578-NO 

SAJEWSKI FUNERAL HOME, INC., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 25, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 

7.302(H)(1). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this 

order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.
EXHIBIT 10

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 328-10 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:7469
Document title: Amazon.com: Gyroor T580 Hoverboard Self Balancing Scooter with Music Speaker LED Lights, 6.5 inch Two-Wheel Electric Scooter for Kids - UL2272...

Capture URL: https://www.amazon.com/Gyroor-Hoverboard-Balancing-Two-Wheel-Electric/dp/B07GFK49QR/ref=sr_1_1?...

Capture timestamp (UTC): Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:06:33 GMT Page 1 of 6

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 328-10 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 2 of 7 PageID #:7470
Document title: Amazon.com: Gyroor T580 Hoverboard Self Balancing Scooter with Music Speaker LED Lights, 6.5 inch Two-Wheel Electric Scooter for Kids - UL2272...

Capture URL: https://www.amazon.com/Gyroor-Hoverboard-Balancing-Two-Wheel-Electric/dp/B07GFK49QR/ref=sr_1_1?...

Capture timestamp (UTC): Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:06:33 GMT Page 2 of 6

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 328-10 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 3 of 7 PageID #:7471
Document title: Amazon.com: Gyroor T580 Hoverboard Self Balancing Scooter with Music Speaker LED Lights, 6.5 inch Two-Wheel Electric Scooter for Kids - UL2272...

Capture URL: https://www.amazon.com/Gyroor-Hoverboard-Balancing-Two-Wheel-Electric/dp/B07GFK49QR/ref=sr_1_1?...

Capture timestamp (UTC): Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:06:33 GMT Page 3 of 6

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 328-10 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 4 of 7 PageID #:7472
Document title: Amazon.com: Gyroor T580 Hoverboard Self Balancing Scooter with Music Speaker LED Lights, 6.5 inch Two-Wheel Electric Scooter for Kids - UL2272...

Capture URL: https://www.amazon.com/Gyroor-Hoverboard-Balancing-Two-Wheel-Electric/dp/B07GFK49QR/ref=sr_1_1?...

Capture timestamp (UTC): Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:06:33 GMT Page 4 of 6

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 328-10 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 5 of 7 PageID #:7473
Document title: Amazon.com: Gyroor T580 Hoverboard Self Balancing Scooter with Music Speaker LED Lights, 6.5 inch Two-Wheel Electric Scooter for Kids - UL2272...

Capture URL: https://www.amazon.com/Gyroor-Hoverboard-Balancing-Two-Wheel-Electric/dp/B07GFK49QR/ref=sr_1_1?...

Capture timestamp (UTC): Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:06:33 GMT Page 5 of 6

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 328-10 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 6 of 7 PageID #:7474
Document title: Amazon.com: Gyroor T580 Hoverboard Self Balancing Scooter with Music Speaker LED Lights, 6.5 inch Two-Wheel Electric Scooter for Kids - UL2272...

Capture URL: https://www.amazon.com/Gyroor-Hoverboard-Balancing-Two-Wheel-Electric/dp/B07GFK49QR/ref=sr_1_1?...

Capture timestamp (UTC): Thu, 15 Apr 2021 14:06:33 GMT Page 6 of 6

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 328-10 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 7 of 7 PageID #:7475
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
   In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Entropin, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
        10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the
        capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
        18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
  1.  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
  Date: November
                7, 2006
              By:
              */s/
                David L. Norris*Name:
              David
                L. NorrisTitle:
              President and Chief
                Executive Officer


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Entropin, Inc. and will be retained by
      Entropin, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.
HMM Reference NIST Technical Note 2205: Item 8.2 Metal Drip Edge 

Item 8.2 Metal Drip Edge – Metal drip edge protects roof materials. 

No drip edge and no flashing Metal drip edge

No drip edge and no flashing

Note: Selected photographs are included to illustrate each HMM hardening item. Additional vulnerabilities or hardening items may be seen in the photographs, but those are highlighted within their specific HMM item.
There is no CAD drawing for 

Item 8.2: Metal Drip Edge 

Please see photographs for illustrations.
** **

**EXHIBIT 31.02**

**RULE13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Michael L. Pungello,certify that:

1. I have reviewed thisreport on Form 10-Q of BlackRock Futures Investments L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge,this  report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)  Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; and

b)  Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andsuch presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation;

c)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweakness in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14,2006

----

| By /s/ MICHAEL L. PUNGELLO                   |   |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael L. Pungello                          |
| Chief Financial Officer                      |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
INTERIM STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10QSB FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,592,671
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  449,072
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    496,756
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,867,960
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,673,222
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          960,823
<BONDS>                                      2,963,760
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           333
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,213,083
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,673,222
<SALES>                                        478,164
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               478,164
<CGS>                                          253,291
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  253,291
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,023,891
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             360,098
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,159,116)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,159,116)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,159,116)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.CERTIFICATIONIn connection with the periodic report of Novellus Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended October 1, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”), I, William H. Kurtz, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for theperiods indicated.This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and ExchangeCommission.        Dated: November 4, 2005 By:  /s/ William H. Kurtz    William H. Kurtz    Executive Vice President and Chief
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 0063

_____________________________
M ICHAEL S. W INTERS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County

. John H. Skinner , Judge

. March 11, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , R OWE , and M AKAR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahas see , for Appellee.
Dr. Dan Neumann - Leader, Neutron Condensed Matter 

Science Group, NIST Center for Neutron Research

Dan Neumann is the leader of the Neutron Condensed Matter 

Science Group at the NIST Center for Neutron Research, a 

position he has held since 2005. The Group is responsible for 

advancing materials development and characterization in the US 

through neutron scattering. This is accomplished by assisting the 

scientific community with neutron measurements at NIST and by 

developing new neutron measurement methods and 

instrumentation. Dan has served on international advisory and review committees at more than 

a dozen neutron facilities world-wide including the European Spallation Source, a $2B facility

currently under construction in Lund, Sweden. Dan came to NIST after completing his Ph.D. in 

physics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1987. He is a Fellow of the Neutron 

Scattering Society of America and the American Physical Society.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 423 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 423

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 1993 increase 
                 in taxes on Social Security benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2003

 Mr. Paul (for himself, Mr. Duncan, and Mrs. Musgrave) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 1993 increase 
                 in taxes on Social Security benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security Beneficiary Tax 
Reduction Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INCREASE IN TAX ON SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 86(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to social security and tier 1 railroad 
retirement benefits) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
sentence:
        ``This paragraph shall not apply to any taxable year beginning 
        after December 31, 2002.''
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Paragraph (3) of section 871(a) of such Code is amended 
        by striking ``85 percent'' in subparagraph (A) and inserting 
        ``50 percent''.
            (2)(A) Subparagraph (A) of section 121(e)(1) of the Social 
        Security Amendments of 1983 (Public Law 98-21) is amended--
                    (i) by striking ``(A) There'' and inserting 
                ``There'';
                    (ii) by striking ``(i)'' immediately following 
                ``amounts equivalent to''; and
                    (iii) by striking ``, less (ii)'' and all that 
                follows and inserting a period.
            (B) Paragraph (1) of section 121(e) of such Act is amended 
        by striking subparagraph (B).
            (C) Paragraph (3) of section 121(e) of such Act is amended 
        by striking subparagraph (B) and by redesignating subparagraph 
        (C) as subparagraph (B).
            (D) Paragraph (2) of section 121(e) of such Act is amended 
        in the first sentence by striking ``paragraph (1)(A)'' and 
        inserting ``paragraph (1)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2002.
                                 <all>
```
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 19

- 31010 Summary Calendar

United States of America,
Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

versus
Javier Munoz,
Defendant

— Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:19

- CV

- 1197 USDC No. 2:17

- CR

- 330

- 1

Before Dennis, Southwick, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : * Javier Munoz, federal prisoner # 20457

- 035, moves for a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his 165

- month sentence for possession of me thamphetamine with

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 4, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-31010 Document: 00515733095 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/04/2021No. 19

- 31010

2 intent to distribute. He also challenges the district court’s denial of an evidentiary hearing on his constitutional claims. Munoz contends that his trial counsel failed to (1) investigate a video of the traffic stop during which the c harged methamphetamine was seized and (2) move to suppress the drug evidence based on video of the traffic stop

. To obtain a COA, Munoz must make “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right,” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), by “show[ing] that reasonable jurists could debat e whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the [motion] should have been resolved in a different manner or th at the issues presented were adequate to deserve en couragement to proceed further,” Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). To meet that burden, he must show that “reasonable jurists would find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional cla ims debatable or wrong.” Slack , 529 U.S. at 484. Munoz fails to make the requisite showing. Accordingly, the motion for a COA is DENIED . As Munoz fails to make the required showing for a COA on his constitutional claims, we do not reach whether the dist rict court erred by denying an evidentiary hearing. See United States v. Davis , 971 F.3d 524, 534

- 35 (5th Cir. 2020). Case: 19-31010 Document: 00515733095 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/04/2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM
NIGHTINGALE,  INC.'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     (11)
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         (11)
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               216,916
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 216,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          343,362
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (147,046)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   216,916
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,723
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5,492
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (2,769)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.00)
        


</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 421

To reauthorize the United States Institute for Environmental Conflict 

Resolution, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2003

Mr. KOLBE (for himself, Mr. PASTOR, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. UDALL

of New Mexico, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, and Mr. GRIJALVA) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To reauthorize the United States Institute for Environmental 

Conflict Resolution, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Environmental Policy 

5 and Conflict Resolution Advancement Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION FUND. 

7 Section 13 of the Morris K. Udall Scholarship and 

8 Excellence in National Environmental and Native Amer-
2

•HR 421 IH 

1 ican Public Policy Act of 1992 (20 U.S.C. 5609) is amend2 ed by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following: 

3 ‘‘(b) ENVIRONMENTAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION

4 FUND.—There is authorized to be appropriated to the En5 vironmental Dispute Resolution Fund established by sec6 tion 10 $4,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2004 through 

7 2008, of which—

8 ‘‘(1) $3,000,000 shall be used to pay operations 

9 costs (including not more than $1,000 for official re10 ception and representation expenses); and 

11 ‘‘(2) $1,000,000 shall be used for grants or 

12 other appropriate arrangements to pay the costs of 

13 services provided in a neutral manner relating to, 

14 and to support the participation of non-Federal enti15 ties (such as State and local governments, tribal 

16 governments, nongovernmental organizations, and 

17 individuals) in, environmental conflict resolution pro18 ceedings involving Federal agencies.’’.

Æ