alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1 /
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Design Source, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Peter A. Reichard, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.





/s/ Peter A.
      ReichardName:
                  Peter
      A. ReichardTitle:
                  Chief
      Executive and Financial OfficerDate:
                  June
      29, 2009
Exhibit 21


                      THE MAY DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                   SUBSIDIARIES OF MAY


The corporations listed below are subsidiaries of May, and all are included in
the consolidated financial statements of May as subsidiaries (unnamed
subsidiaries, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not
constitute a significant subsidiary):


                                                          Jurisdiction
                                                          in which
      Name                                                organized

The May Department Stores Company                         New York

May Merchandising Company                                 Delaware

May Department Stores International, Inc.                 Delaware

May Capital, Inc.                                         Delaware

Grande Levee, Inc.                                        Nevada

Leadville Insurance Company                               Vermont

Snowdin Insurance Company                                 Vermont

David's Bridal, Inc.                                      Florida

After Hours Formalwear, Inc.                              Georgia

Priscilla of Boston, Inc.                                 Delaware
EXHIBIT 32.1

     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
   1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the accompanying  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 of BrightStar  Information  Technology
Group, Inc. (the "Form 10-Q"),  I, Brian Burnett,  Chief Executive  Officer,  of
BrightStar  Information  Technology Group,  Inc.,  certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   such Form 10-Q for the  quarterly  period ended  September  30, 2005
            fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
            ended September 30, 2005 fairly presents,  in all material respects,
            the  financial  condition  and results of  operations  of BrightStar
            Information Technology Group, Inc.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written  statement  required by Section  906,  has been  provided to  BrightStar
Information   Technology   Group,  Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by  BrightStar
Information  Technology Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: Nov __, 2005                                   BY:
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Brian Burnett
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4147 

To establish a servitude and emancipation archival research clearinghouse 

in the National Archives. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2004 

Mr. CUMMINGS (for himself, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Ms. CORRINE BROWN

of Florida, Ms. CARSON of Indiana, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Mr. CLYBURN, 

Mr. CLAY, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. FATTAH, Mr. FORD, Mr. HASTINGS of 

Florida, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mr. MEEK of 

Florida, Mr. OWENS, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. RUSH, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. TOWNS, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, and Ms. WATERS) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government 

Reform 

A BILL 

To establish a servitude and emancipation archival research 

clearinghouse in the National Archives. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Servitude and Emanci5 pation Archival Research ClearingHouse Act of 2004’’ or 

6 the ‘‘SEARCH Act of 2004’’. 
2 

•HR 4147 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF DATABASE. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Archivist of the United 

3 States shall establish, as a part of the National Archives, 

4 a national database consisting of historic records of ser5 vitude and emancipation in the United States to assist Af6 rican Americans in researching their genealogy. 

7 (b) MAINTENANCE.—The database established by 

8 this Act shall be maintained by the National Historical 

9 Publications and Records Commission. 

10 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

11 There are authorized to be appropriated— 

12 (1) $5,000,000 to establish the national data13 base authorized by this Act; and 

14 (2) $5,000,000 to provide grants to States and 

15 colleges and universities to preserve local records of 

16 servitude and emancipation. 

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Wayne Farms LLC

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−05191

Honorable Gary Feinerman

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, October 15, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Motion hearing held. For

the reasons stated on the record, Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction [19] is

granted. Plaintiff shall submit a proposed order to the proposed order email box. Status

hearing set for 12/4/2020 at 9:15 a.m. Attorneys/Parties should appear for the 12/4/2020

hearing by calling the Toll−Free Number: (877) 336−1828, Access Code: 4082461.

Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing (use toll

free number). Please, please be sure to keep your phone on mute when you are not

speaking. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general

prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings.

Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued

media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or

any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice.(jlj, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 22 Filed: 10/15/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:207
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of NexGen Biofuels Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Ram
Ajjarapu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, following due inquiry, I believe that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company. and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                         NEXGEN BIOFUELS LTD.

May 20, 2009                        By: /s/ J. Ram Ajjarapu
                                         -----------------------
                                         J. RAM AJJARAPU
                                         CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
```
<PAGE>   1




                                                                     EXHIBIT 11





                        EARNINGS PER SHARE COMPUTATIONS
                      (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                            Three Month Period            Six Month Period
                                                                               Ended June 30,               Ended June 30,
                                                                            ------------------           -----------------

                                                                             1998          1997           1998         1997
                                                                           --------      --------        -------     -------
<S>                                                                        <C>           <C>             <C>         <C>
EARNINGS PER COMMON AND DILUTIVE
  COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE:
  Net Income                                                                $ 6,961      $  5,008       $ 14,625    $ 10,701
                                                                            =======      ========       ========    ========
   Shares:
  Weighted average number of common
      shares outstanding                                                     26,515        20,831         26,012      20,896
  Weighted average number of additional shares
      issuable for common stock equivalents (a)                                 688         1,222            732       1,309
                                                                            -------      --------       --------    --------
         Adjusted common shares                                              27,203        22,053         26,744      22,205
                                                                            =======      ========       ========    ========

EARNINGS PER SHARE -DILUTED                                                 $  0.26      $   0.23       $   0.55    $   0.48
                                                                            =======      ========       ========    ========
</TABLE>


(a)      Shares issuable were derived using the "Treasury Stock Method" for all
         dilutive common stock equivalents.
#### Jesse Henry *v.*Commonwealth of Kentucky.

Weapons — Evidence—Wearing Weapon Belt.

The object of the Legislature in, enacting the Act of March 22, ■1871, § 5, was to permit the fact of a belt being around the body to go to the jury as evidence on the question whether a deadly weapon was carried concealed.

*195Weapons — Evidence of Carrying.

The fact that accused wore a belt around him, such as weapons are usually cárried. in, will not alone authorize-a finding that accused' carried a deadly weapon. .

Weapons — Statute Construed.'

Act March 22, 1871, relating to the carrying of concealed weapons, construed.

Statutes — Concealed Weapons.

Act March 22, 1871, relating to the carrying of concealed weapons, construed.

APPEAL FROM CHRISTIAN CIRCUIT COURT.

December 6, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge PEyoe:

It is difficult toi arive at the meaning of the fifth section of the act approved March 22, 1871, in regard to the carrying of concealed deadly weapons. It was certainly not intended to authorize a verdict upon proof that the party accused had a belt under his coat, or fastened around his person, nor to subject a man to' punishment with a belt fastened around him and the pistol itself exposed and not concealed.

The object of the legislature doubtless was to permit the fact of the belt being around the body to go to the jury as evidence .upon the question as to whether the deadly weapon was carried concealed. ■

It must appear that the party accused carried a deadly weapon concealed in order to find him guilty, and to determine the question of guilt or innocence ‘ the fact of his having a belt around him, such as pistols or deadly weapons are usually carried in, may go to the jury to be considered by them upon the issue presented; but this fact alone will not authorize a jury to say that the party carried a concealed deadly weapon; and although the act in question does indicate that it is the duty of the judge to tell the jury, if the facts proven are true, they must find the pistol concealed, although it may not have been concealed; still we are inclined to the conclusion that the legislature intended merely to- express the opinion that as juror's they will find a party guilty upon the state of facts recited in the third section.

The court erred in giving the second instruction and in refusing the instructions asked for by the counsel for the accused. We *196think, however, the word “actual” should be erased from defendant’s instruction and was doubtless inserted by reason of Instruction No. 2 given by the court.

*Feland & Evans, for appellant.*

*' Rodman, for appellee.*

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to award the appellant a.new trial and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
#### Jose A. RAGUINE, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 04-3234.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: Dec. 8, 2004.

Before SCHALL, BRYSON, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

DECISION

PER CURIAM.

Jose A. Raguine appeals from an order of the Merit Systems Protection Board in Docket No. SE08310302S1-I-1, 2004 WL 601756, upholding the decision of the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”), denying his request for a retirement annuity. We *affirm.*

BACKGROUND

Mr. Raguine worked for the Department of the Navy at the Navy’s Subic Bay Naval Base in the Philippines until he retired in 1992. Mr. Raguine subsequently applied for an annuity, which OPM denied on December 9, 1993. On August 18, 1999, Mr. Raguine again applied for an annuity. OPM rejected that application, noting that it had already denied his request for an annuity six years earlier. Three and a half years later, Mr. Raguine submitted a request for reconsideration of that decision. The request for reconsideration was postmarked on January 8, 2003. OPM denied the request for reconsideration based on lack of timeliness, and Mr. Raguine appealed to the Board. On appeal to the Board, Mr. Raguine claimed that circumstances beyond his control — a prolonged illness and indigence — prevented him from filing a timely reconsideration request.

Mr. Raguine did not request a hearing, and the administrative judge decided the appeal on the written record. Mr. Raguine proffered several statements relating to his medical and financial condition and copies of medical reports as evidence of his illness and indigence. The administrative judge, however, found that that the medical documents did not identify the time period during which Mr. Raguine suffered from his infirmities. More importantly, the administrative judge found that Mr. Raguine had failed to explain why his medical and financial conditions prevented him from filing a timely request for reconsideration. The administrative judge noted that Mr. Raguine’s infirmities and indigence did not prevent him from filing a second application for annuity benefits in 1999 or filing an appeal with the Board. The administrative judge therefore affirmed OPM’s dismissal of Mr. Raguine’s reconsideration request. The full Board subsequently denied Mr. Raguine’s petition for review.

DISCUSSION

In his petition for review by this court, Mr. Raguine does not explain how his financial and medical conditions prevented him from filing a request for reconsideration for nine years after his first application for an annuity was denied and for three years after the denial of his second application. He merely states that the Board “failed to consider[] my presented facts and reasons why my case was un*128timely filed.” However, it is clear that the Board considered all the facts and arguments that Mr. Raguine actually presented. Because substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that Mr. Raguine had not shown any justification for the untimeliness of his request for reconsideration, we affirm the decision of the Board.
EXHIBIT 32.1NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.CERTIFICATIONIn connection with the periodic report of Novellus Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”), I, Richard S. Hill, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for theperiods indicated.This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and ExchangeCommission.       Dated: November 9, 2006 By: /s/ Richard S. Hill       Richard S. Hill      Chairman of the Board of Directorsand Chief Executive Officer      (Principal Executive Officer)
HMM Reference NIST Technical Note 2205: Item 15.3 No Crawl Space Vent

Note: Selected photographs are included to illustrate each HMM hardening item. Additional vulnerabilities or hardening items may be seen in the photographs, but those are highlighted within their specific HMM item.

Photos pending.
There is no CAD drawing for 

Item 15.3: Crawl Space Vent, None 

Please see photographs for illustrations.
- HR 596 Metric Law A 1866
- HR 596 Metric Law B 1866
- HR 596 Metric Law C 1866
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

      ( print page 70533)    
The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than December 09, 2014.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Chapelle Davis, Assistant Vice President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:

                    1.                     *Brian D. Lucas, Fort Myers, Florida, individually and as trustee for Charles Vincent Lucas Trust dated 12/26/2007 and Jack Roderick Lucas Trust, both of Annapolis, Maryland, and Trust FBO Grant Joseph Lucas 12/22/04, Fort Myers, Florida; Bay Harbour L.P., and its general partner Peninsula Investments, Inc., Bonita Springs, Florida; David Lucas, Fort Myers, Florida, individually and as trustee for Brian David Lucas Trust u/a/d 12/15/76 and Trust FBO Grady David Lucas 12/26/06, both of Fort Myers, Florida, and Trust FBO Caroline Jenna Lucas 7/10/09, Cape Coral, Florida; Jack Roderick Lucas, Fort Myers, Florida; Michael Ukleja and Louise Ukleja, both of Long Beach, California; Megan Lucas Spears, Tampa, Florida; and Kevin M. Lucas and Karen S. Lucas, both of Annapolis, Maryland;*                     to retain voting shares of Finemark Holdings, Inc., and indirectly retain voting shares of Finemark National Bank & Trust, both of Fort Myers, Florida.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 20, 2014.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2014-27942 Filed 11-25-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P