alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,550
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  281,809
<ALLOWANCES>                                   215,743
<INVENTORY>                                     87,915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               165,152
<PP&E>                                         453,318
<DEPRECIATION>                                 271,757
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 456,829
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          725,624
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    679,310
<COMMON>                                         3,696
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,524,350)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   456,829
<SALES>                                        438,932
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               438,932
<CGS>                                          275,052
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  275,052
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,222,978
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              48,634
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,075,708)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,075,708)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
SUBROUTINE HFNCDF(X,CDF)
C
C     PURPOSE--THIS SUBROUTINE COMPUTES THE CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
C              FUNCTION VALUE FOR THE HALFNORMAL
C              DISTRIBUTION.
C              THE HALFNORMAL DISTRIBUTION USED
C              HEREIN HAS MEAN = SQRT(2/PI) = 0.79788456
C              AND STANDARD DEVIATION = 1.
C              THIS DISTRIBUTION IS DEFINED FOR ALL NON-NEGATIVE X
C              AND HAS THE PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION
C              F(X) = (2/SQRT(2*PI)) * EXP(-X*X/2).
C              THE HALFNORMAL DISTRIBUTION USED HEREIN
C              IS THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE VARIATE X = ABS(Z) WHERE
C              THE VARIATE Z IS NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED
C              WITH MEAN = 0 AND STANDARD DEVIATION = 1.
C     INPUT  ARGUMENTS--X      = THE SINGLE PRECISION VALUE 
C                                AT WHICH THE CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION 
C                                FUNCTION IS TO BE EVALUATED.
C                                X SHOULD BE NON-NEGATIVE.
C     OUTPUT ARGUMENTS--CDF    = THE SINGLE PRECISION CUMULATIVE
C                                DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION VALUE.
C     OUTPUT--THE SINGLE PRECISION CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
C             FUNCTION VALUE CDF FOR THE HALFNORMAL
C             DISTRIBUTION WITH MEAN = SQRT(2/PI) = 0.79788456
C             AND STANDARD DEVIATION = 1.
C     PRINTING--NONE UNLESS AN INPUT ARGUMENT ERROR CONDITION EXISTS. 
C     RESTRICTIONS--X SHOULD BE NON-NEGATIVE.
C     OTHER DATAPAC   SUBROUTINES NEEDED--NORCDF. 
C     FORTRAN LIBRARY SUBROUTINES NEEDED--NONE.
C     MODE OF INTERNAL OPERATIONS--SINGLE PRECISION.
C     LANGUAGE--ANSI FORTRAN. 
C     REFERENCES--JOHNSON AND KOTZ, CONTINUOUS UNIVARIATE
C                 DISTRIBUTIONS--1, 1970, PAGES 53, 59, 81, 83.
C               --DANIEL, 'USE OF HALF-NORMAL PLOTS IN
C                 INTERPRETING FACTORIAL TWO-LEVEL EXPERIMENTS',
C                 TECHNOMETRICS, 1959, PAGES 311-341.
C     WRITTEN BY--JAMES J. FILLIBEN
C                 STATISTICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY (205.03)
C                 NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS
C                 WASHINGTON, D. C. 20234
C                 PHONE:  301-921-2315
C     ORIGINAL VERSION--NOVEMBER  1975. 
C     UPDATED         --OCTOBER   1976. 
C
C---------------------------------------------------------------------
C
      IPR=6
C
C     CHECK THE INPUT ARGUMENTS FOR ERRORS
C
      IF(X.LT.0.0)GOTO50
      GOTO90
   50 WRITE(IPR,4)
      WRITE(IPR,46)X
      CDF=0.0
      RETURN
   90 CONTINUE
    4 FORMAT(1H , 96H***** NON-FATAL DIAGNOSTIC--THE FIRST  INPUT ARGUME
     1NT TO THE HFNCDF SUBROUTINE IS NEGATIVE *****)
   46 FORMAT(1H , 35H***** THE VALUE OF THE ARGUMENT IS ,E15.8,6H *****)
C
C-----START POINT-----------------------------------------------------
C
      CALL NORCDF(X,CDF)
      CDF=2.0*CDF-1.0
C
      RETURN
      END
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4199 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,5-thiophenediybis(5-tert-butyl-1,3- 

benzoxazole). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2004 

Mr. BONNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,5-thiophenediybis(5- 

tert-butyl-1,3-benzoxazole). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 2,5- 

4 THIOPHENEDIYBIS(5-TERT-BUTYL-1,3- 

5 BENZOXAZOLE). 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following: 

‘‘ 9902.34.23 2,5-thiophenediybis(5-tertbutyl-1,3-benzoxazole) (CAS 

No. 7128–64–5) (provided 

for in subheading 

3204.20.80) ......................... Free No Change No Change On or Before 

12/31/2007 ’’. 
2 

•HR 4199 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-22-0000095

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

STATE OF HAWAI I, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

JONNAH N.M. SMITH, also known as JONNAH SMITH,

Defendant-Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT

(CASE NO. 2FFC-21-0000378)

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS APPEAL

(By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, Hiraoka and Chan, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the Stipulation for Dismissal of

Appeal, filed on November 21, 2022, by Plaintiff-Appellant State

of Hawai i, it appears that: (1) the appeal was docketed on

April 7, 2022; (2) the parties stipulate to dismiss the appeal,

under Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 42(b); and (3)

the stipulation is dated and signed by counsel for all parties

appearing in the appeal.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation

for Dismissal of Appeal is approved, and the appeal is dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, December 16, 2022.

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Presiding Judge

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka

Associate Judge

/s/ Derrick H.M. Chan

Associate Judge

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-22-0000095

16-DEC-2022

07:55 AM

Dkt. 46 OAWST
Exhibit 31.1

Certification

I,
Michael Gooch, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of GFI Group Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
March 2, 2009

/s/ MICHAEL GOOCH Michael Gooch Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

      Certification of Chief Executive Officer/Principal Financial Officer
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2004 ("Report") of Valley Forge Scientific Corp., I, Jerry L. Malis,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Valley Forge Scientific Corp., certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
               or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of Valley Forge Scientific Corp.


Date:  August 12, 2004                       /s/ JERRY L. MALIS
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Jerry L. Malis
                                             President,
                                             Chief Executive Officer, and
                                             Principal Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of the Securities
Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless
of any general incorporation language in such filing.

                                      -26-
Exhibit 23.3  CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS  We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3
(Nos.333-150244 and 333-153203) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-112932, 333-119808,
333-121705, and 333-133898) of Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.
of our report dated March 31, 2008 relating to the financial statements of
W2005 Kapalua/Gengate Hotel Holdings, LLC, which appears in this Form 10-K.  /s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Fort Lauderdale, Florida March 30, 2009
127979771.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN RE: BROILER CHICKEN ANTITRUST 

LITIGATION

Case No. 1:16-cv-08637

Judge Thomas Durkin

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey T. Gilbert

Individual Case No. 1:20-cv-05259

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

Wawa, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc., et al.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF CLAIMS BY 

WAWA, INC. 

AGAINST DEFENDANT PILGRIM’S PRIDE CORPORATION

The parties in the above styled action, through counsel, stipulate to the following and 

respectfully request this Court’s approval of their stipulation:

This Stipulation is between Plaintiff Wawa, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Pilgrim’s 

Pride Corporation (Pilgrim’s).

1. This Stipulation relates only to Plaintiff’s claims in Wawa, Inc. v. Tyson Foods,

Inc., et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-05259 (the “Action”). 

2. In accordance with Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,

Plaintiff and Pilgrim’s stipulate and agree to the dismissal, with prejudice, of Plaintiff’s claims 

asserted against Pilgrim’s in the Action (including as set forth against Pilgrim’s in the Amended 

DAP Consolidated Complaint, ECF No. 4244), with each side bearing its own attorneys’ fees and 

Case: 1:20-cv-05259 Document #: 11 Filed: 12/10/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:156
2

127979771.1

costs. The Stipulation of Dismissal, with prejudice, has no bearing on the Plaintiff’s claims against 

Defendants other than Pilgrim’s.

SO ORDERED:

United States District Judge

Dated: 

Dated: December 10, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ David B. Esau

David B. Esau

Carlton Fields, P.A. 

525 Okeechobee Boulevard, Suite 1200

West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Tel: (561) 659-7070

Fax: (561) 659-7368

E-mail: desau@carltonfields.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

/s/ Carrie C. Mahan

Carrie C. Mahan (#459802)

Christopher J. Abbott (#1014487)

WEIL GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

2001 M Street, N.W., Suite 600

Washington, D.C. 20036

Tel: (202) 682-7000

Fax: (202) 857-0940

E-mail: carrie.mahan@weil.com

christopher.abbott@weil.com

Counsel for Defendant Pilgrim’s Pride 

Corporation

12/10/2021

Case: 1:20-cv-05259 Document #: 11 Filed: 12/10/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:157
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.     The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:                 | /s/ GEOFFREY S.M. HEDRICK |   |
|---------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                |                      |   |
|                | GEOFFREY S.M. HEDRICK     |   |
|                | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER   |   |
|                |                      |   |
|                |                      |   |
|                | /s/ JOHN C. LONG          |   |
|                |                      |   |
|                | JOHN C. LONG              |   |
|                | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER   |   |
|                |                      |   |
| August 5, 2010 |

 

1

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of the United States Trade Representative

# AGENCY:

Office of the United States Trade Representative.

# ACTION:

Notice

# SUMMARY:

The following staff members have been appointed to serve on the Performance Review Board:

Performance Review Board (PRB)

Chair: Wendy Cutler

Member: Barbara Weisel

Member: Florizelle Liser

Member: Lewis Karesh

Member: Sharon Bomer-Lauritsen

Executive Secretary: Ronald Nerida

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         November 20, 2014                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Questions regarding this submission should be directed to Susan Buck, Acting Director, USTR Office of Human Resources (202) 395-7630.

Fred Ames,

Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Administration, Office of the United States Trade Representative.

[FR Doc. 2014-28179 Filed 11-28-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3290-F4-P
| REAL      ESTATE OPERATIONS:         |   |      |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|-----------|--------|
|                                 |   |      |   |
| Beltway      Assets LLC              |   | Delaware  |   |
| FireRock      LLC                    |   | Delaware  |   |
| Lakepointe      Assets LLC           |   | Delaware  |   |
| MAXXAM      Property Company         |   | Delaware  |   |
| MCO      Properties LP               |   | Delaware  |   |
| MCO      Properties, Inc.            |   | Delaware  |   |
| M-Six      Penvest II Business Trust |   | Delaware  |   |
| M-Six      Penvest II Business Trust |   | Louisiana |   |
| Palmas      Country Club, Inc.       |   | Delaware  |   |
| Palmas      del Mar Properties, Inc. |   | Delaware  |   |
|                                 |   |      |   |
| RACING      OPERATIONS:              |   |      |   |
|                                 |   |      |   |
| Sam      Houston Race Park, Ltd.     |   | Texas     |   |
| Valley      Race Park, Inc.          |   | Texas     |   |
|                                 |   |      |   |
| OTHER:                               |   |      |   |
|                                 |   |      |   |
| MAXXAM      Group Holdings Inc.      |   | Delaware  |   |

----
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2404

_____________________________

LEROY FISHER,

Petitioner,

v.

CANDACE ROBERTS and STATE OF 

FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF 

REVENUE,

Respondents.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction. 

December 21, 2018

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

WOLF, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

John Merrett, Jacksonville, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondents.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

IN RE: TIKTOK, INC.,

CONSUMER PRIVACY

LITIGATION,

This Document Relates to All Cases

No. 20-cv-4699

Judge John Z. Lee

Magistrate Judge Sunil R. Harjani 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Erik H. Langeland, a member in good standing of the bar of the State of New York and 

the United State District Court for the Southern District of New York, hereby enters his 

appearance for Plaintiff, H.S., a Minor, through her Guardian, J.S., individually and on behalf of 

all others similarly situated, in the above matter.

September 23, 2020 Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Erik H. Langeland

Erik H. Langeland

733 Third Avenue, 16 Floor

New York, NY 10017

(212) 354-6270

(212) 898-9086 fax

elangeland@langelandlaw.com

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 90 Filed: 09/23/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1734
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





The Board of Directors
Verio Inc.:


We consent to the use of our reports incorporated by reference herein.




                                                     KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Denver, Colorado
July 17, 1998
#### Frederick Raynsford v. Theodore I. Phelps.

*Tea-sale based on mid tax*— Damnum *absque injwria.*

A tax sale based upon a void tax does no sucb injury to a mortgagee of land as will sustain an action for damages against the tax collector 'as for making a false return of unpaid taxes ; and in such suit the collector is not estopped by his return from showing that the tax was void.

Error to Kent.

Submitted Oct. 11.

Decided Oct. 18.

Case. Plaintiff brings error.

Affirmed.

*Stone & Hyde*for appellant.

A tax-collector is protected for his acts under process that is fair on its face, and would not be liable for any costs but his own: *Nowell v. Tripp*61 Me. 126; Cooley on Taxation 561; he is bound to collect the tax, and exhaust his authority in so doing, even by arrest, though the tax is- illegal: *Bird v. Perkins,*33 Mich. 28; Cooley on Taxation 560, 561; the rule is the same *316in an action against a sheriff for an escape: *Jones v. Cook*1 Cow. 313; *Smith v. Knapp*30 N. Y. 584; *Bensel v.*Lynch, 44 N. Y. 162.

*Simonds, Fletcher & Wolf*for appellee.

A tax collector is not bound to collect an illegal tax: Cooley on Taxation 500 ; *Reynolds v. Lofton*18 Ga. 47; *Barlow v. The Ordinary*47 Ga. 639; *Cheshire v. Howland*13 Gray 321; *Adams v. Farnsworth*15 Gray 423; because though the tax-roll may be *prima facie*good and protect the collector in an action of trespass, the property can be replevied from him and he held in damages and costs, if the tax is invalid: *LeRoy v. East Saginaw City*Railway, 18 Mich. 233; *Beach v. Botsford*1 Doug. (Mich.) 199 ; *Adams v. Hubbard*30 Mich. 104; *Gidday v.*Witherspoon 35 Mich. 368 ; *Andrews v. Smith*41 Mich. 683; a sheriff when sued for neglect in collecting an execution, regular on its face, can show that the judgment on which it was issued was void: *Albee v. Ward*8 Mass. 79; *Earl v. Camp*16 Wend. 562; *Cornell v. Barnes*7 Hill 35; *Hill v. Wait*5 Vt. 124; a sheriff is not liable for falsely returning an execution *nulla bona,*if it is issued on a void judgment: *McDonald v. Bunn*3 Den. 45 ; *Tyler v. Duke of Leeds*2 Stark. 218.

Campbell, J.

Raynsford sued Phelps for alleged damages from a false return. 13 Mich. 312. Raynsford held a mortgage on certain lands in Kent county, and claims that Phelps as tax collector returned certain taxes unpaid, when in fact he could have collected them out of personalty. He insists, therefore, that to that extent his security was impaired, and clouded, by the tax sale under the return.

On the trial it appeared that the tax was void, and no dispute seems to exist on this. The defects were such as have been frequently passed upon. But plaintiff still insists that there was wrong done by the false return, and that the defendant is estopped by it. A sufficient answer to this is that plaintiff can only sue for a wrong from which he has suffered injury, and that a void-tax creates no such injury. ¡

Judgment must be affirmed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.5



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the inclusion in this registration statement on Form S-1
of our report dated February 13, 1997, on our audit of the consolidated
financial statements of Community Pacific Broadcasting Company L.P. We also
consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts".




                                        COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

San Jose, California
March 27, 1998