alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0614

IN RE THE ADOPTION OF:

R.D.J., a Minor Child,

JEREMY JAMES,

Petitioner and Appellee,

v.

WAYNE DARRELL DAILEY,

Respondent and Appellant.

FILED

JUN 2 8 2021

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Suprerne Court

State of Montana

ORDER

This Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance with Rules 11 and 12 of the

Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure. After reviewing the Appellant's reply brief filed

on June 28, 2021, this Court has determined that the brief does not comply with the Rule

and must be resubmitted.

M. R. App. P. 11(4)(a) pertains to the word count of a proportionately-spaced

brief, denoted in the certificate of cornpliance, and states that "a reply brief or amicus

brief shall not exceed 5,000 words." (Emphasis added.) Appellant's reply brief denotes

the brief contains 6,023 words, which is well above the required length.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the signed original and nine copies of the referenced brief

be returned for revisions necessary to comply with the specified Rule;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a signed original and nine copies of the revised

brief ordered herein be filed within ten (10) days of the date of this Order with the Clerk

of this Court and that one copy of the revised brief be served on each counsel of record;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no changes, additions, or deletions other than

those specified in this Order may be made to the brief as originally filed;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the postage costs for returning the referenced

06/29/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0614
copies of Appellant's brief will be billed to Appellant's counsel by the Clerk of this Court

and shall be due and payable upon receipt; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained

in M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the revised brief.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to mail a true copy of this Order to counsel for

Appellant and to mail a true copy of this Order to all counsel upon whom the brief was

served.

DATED this 2.8 day of June, 2021.

For the Court,

Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             690
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,454
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (255)
<INVENTORY>                                     12,498
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,968
<PP&E>                                          16,920
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,086)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,761
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            71
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,165
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,486
<SALES>                                         17,082
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,082
<CGS>                                           12,698
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,629
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (14)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    15
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,620
<INCOME-TAX>                                       406
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,214
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,214
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RASHAWN J. WILLIAMS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 22 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of June, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### SCOTTSDALE INS. CO. v. WEST

No. 233P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 221

Petition by defendant (West) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 23 July 1997.
Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc.

PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS



|                                                                                                     |  |                                                                                                            |  |                                                                                                      
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|AUSTIN OFFICE: 9601 AMBERGLEN BLVD., SUITE 117 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78729 (512) 249-7000 FAX (512) 233-2618 |  | MAIN OFFICE: 306 WEST
7TH STREET, SUITE 302 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102-4987 (817) 336-2461 FAX (817) 877-3728 |  | HOUSTON OFFICE: 1000
LOUISIANA, SUITE 625 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-5008 (713)
651-9944 FAX (713) 651-9980

Exhibit 23.1

Baseline Oil & Gas Corp.

411 North Sam Houston Parkway East, Ste 300

Houston, Texas 77060

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The undersigned consents to the use of the name Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc and to the inclusion of our evaluation summary, dated
March 10, 2008, of the Baseline Oil & Gas Interests  Proved Reserves for Matagorda and Stephens Counties, Texas as of December 31, 2007 (the Reserve Report) as Exhibit 99.1 in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Baseline Oil & Gas Corp.

We further consent to the use of information from our Reserve Report in the sections
Items 1 and 2. Business and Properties  Natural Gas and Oil Reserves and Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of the Annual Report on 10-K of Baseline
Oil & Gas Corp.

Cawley, Gillespie & Associates, Inc.

LOGO

Kenneth J. Mueller, P. E.

Vice President

Fort Worth, Texas

March 28, 2008
Exhibit 23

                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our reports included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended February 2, 2002 into the Company's previously
filed Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-42940, 333-42940-01) and
Form S-8 (No. 333-59792, 333-76227 and 333-00957).




/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
1010 Market Street
St. Louis, Missouri  63101-2089
April 5, 2002
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: In re: 

TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation

Case Number: 20-cv-4699/MDL No. 2948

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

P.S., through her legal guardian, Cheryl Slate and M.T.W., through her legal guardian, 

Brenda Washington

Attorney name (type or print): Robert A. Clifford

Firm: Clifford Law Offices, P.C.

Street address: 120 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 3100

City/State/Zip: Chicago, IL 60602

Bar ID Number: 0461849

(See item 3 in instructions)

Telephone Number: 312-899-9090

Email Address: rac@cliffordlaw.com

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case? Yes No

Are you acting as local counsel in this case? Yes No

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar? Yes No

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? Yes No

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

 Appointed Counsel

If appointed counsel, are you a

Federal Defender

CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this Court’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 U.S.C.§1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath. 

Executed on 08/27/2020

Attorney signature: S/ Robert A. Clifford

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 15 Filed: 08/27/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:230
10498.

#### Brown *v.*Bank of Covington.

Decided November 26, 1919.

Complaint; from Newton superior court—Judge Smith. March 28, 1919.

*King & Johnson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Rogers & Knox,*contra.

Jenkins, P. J.

The fact that the cashier who acted for a bank in making a loan to the defendant was the same individual who sold an automobile to defendant, and as such seller received the proceeds of the bank’s loan, could not operate to render the bank liable to the purchaser of the ear for a breach of the seller’s warranties by reason of the fact that the bank’s cashier thus had knowledge of the terms of the warranty. This ruling is not in conflict with the principle announced in *Singleton*v. *Bank of Monticello,*113 *Ga.*527 (38 S. E. 947), since it is not here shown that the bank itself in any way furthered or participated in the sale. Even the statement imputed to the cashier and seller, that the bank would guarantee the terms of the warranty as made by the seller, would not render the bank liable thereon, since any such undertaking on the part of the bank would be ultra vires, illegal, and void. *Bank of Omega*v. *Wingo &c. Shoe Co.,*19 *Ga. App.*177 (91 S. E. 251). The judge did not err in directing a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Stephens, J., concurs. Smith, J., disqualified.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          35,298
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  106,415
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,185
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               178,068
<PP&E>                                         136,072
<DEPRECIATION>                                  85,369
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 267,103
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          170,161
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           406
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,910
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   267,103
<SALES>                                        781,621
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               781,621
<CGS>                                          636,296
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  764,028
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,045
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,282
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,508
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,291
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,217
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
        

</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT JOHN SCOTT EGAN, Appellant,

v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D22-1415

November 29, 2023 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Gregory G. Groger, Judge. Jason T. Forman of Law Offices of Jason T. Forman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and William C. Shelhart, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed, without prejudice to John Scott Egan's filing a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. SILBERMAN, LaROSE, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE MCILMAIL

ON GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

The government moves for reconsideration of our recent denial of its motion to

dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Crowley Government Services, Inc.

, ASBCA No. 63531

, 2023 WL 4196714 ( June 7, 2023 ). We have not requested a

response from appellant

. See John Shaw LLC d /

b

/

a Shaw Building Maintenance

, ASBCA No. 61379, 18

- 1 BCA ¶ 37,026 at 180,294

. A motion for reconsideration is

not intended to allow a party to re

- argue issues that were previously raised and

decided. Id

. Nevertheless, t he government essentially reargues its already

- rejected

position that this appeal is moot. The motion for reconsideration is denied. See Green

Valley Co.

, ASBC A No. 61275, 18

- 1 BCA ¶ 37,044 at 180,330.

Dated: July 21 , 2023

(Signatures continued) TIMOTHY P. MCILMAIL

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals Appeal of

- )

)

Crowley Government Services, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 63531

)

Under Contract No. N62387

- 15

- C

- 2505 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: James Y. Boland, Esq.

Caleb E. McCallum, Esq.

Venable LLP

Tysons Corner, VA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Donald J. Thornley, Esq.

Patrick M. Mayette, Esq.

Trial Attorneys2 I concur

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD

Administrative Judge

Acting Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals I concur

OWEN C. WILSON

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63531

, Appeal of Crowley

Government Services, Inc. , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: July 24 , 2023

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>                                                           5 

        
<S>                                                       <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    YEAR 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         FEB-28-1986 
<PERIOD-START>                                            MAR-01-1995 
<PERIOD-END>                                              FEB-28-1986 
<CASH>                                                              0 
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    0 
<PP&E>                                                              0 
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                      0 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       1,000,828 
<BONDS>                                                             0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                                         0 
<COMMON>                                                       33,917
<OTHER-SE>                                                  1,141,299
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               (1,000,828) 
<SALES>                                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    0 
<CGS>                                                               0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                                   46,812
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0 

         

</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Patriot Scientific Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification
      is
      an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company does hereby
      certify, pursuant to Rule 13a–14(b) or Rule 15d–14(b) of the Securities and
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
      of
      the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




(1)           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:
              January 9, 2008
            /s/
                James L.
                Turley
              James
                L. Turley
              Chief
                Executive
                Officer
Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATION

Re:	Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust 2004-NC4 (the "Trust"),
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-NC4, issued pursuant
to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2004 (the
"Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), by and among Morgan Stanley ABS
Capital I Inc., as depositor, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company,
as trustee (the "Trustee"), HomEq Servicing Corporation, as servicer
(the "Servicer"), and NC Capital Corporation, as responsible party

I, Craig Phillips, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K (the "Annual
Report"), and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution reports
(collectively with this Annual Report, the "Reports") filed in respect
of periods included in the year covered by this Annual Report, of the
Trust;

(2) Based on my knowledge, the information in the Reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this Annual
Report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the Trustee by the Servicer under the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement, for inclusion in the Reports is
included in the Reports;

(4) Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in this Annual Report and required to be delivered to the
Trustee in accordance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, and except as disclosed in the Reports, the Servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement;
and

(5) The Reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
Servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement, that is included in the Reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
the Trustee and the Servicer.

Date:	March 24, 2005
/s/: Craig Phillips
Craig Phillips
President
<PAGE>   1

                                  Exhibit 24.1

                      Consent of Davis, Kinard & Co., P.C.





<PAGE>   2



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8) pertaining to the Deferred Compensation Agreement and Stock Sale Lock-Up
Agreement by and between William D. Josserand, Jr. and Lone Star International
Energy, Inc., Deferred Compensation Agreement and Stock Sale Lock-Up Agreement
by and between Calvin D. Cline and Lone Star International Energy, Inc.,
Deferred Compensation Agreement and Stock Sale Lock-Up Agreement by and between
Don R. Pyles and Lone Star International Energy, Inc., Deferred Compensation
Agreement and Stock Sale Lock-Up Agreement by and between Michael D. Herrington
and Lone Star International Energy, Inc., Deferred Compensation Agreement and
Stock Sale Lock-Up Agreement by and between Richard P. Gazzola and Lone Star
International Energy, Inc., Deferred Compensation Agreement and Stock Sale
Lock-Up Agreement by and between Paula Fleming and Lone Star International
Energy, Inc., Deferred Compensation Agreement and Promissory Notes by and
between C.E. Justice and Lone Star International Energy, Inc., Consulting
Agreement by and between John Moran and Lone Star International Energy, Inc., of
our report dated February 26, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedules of Lone Star International Energy, Inc. included in its
Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 1997, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                    /s/ DAVIS, KINARD & CO., P.C.
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    DAVIS, KINARD & CO., P.C.





Abilene, Texas,
May 4, 1998.
Exhibit 13.9

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Inmarsat Limited (the "Company") for the annual period ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Periodic Report"), I, Andrew Sukawaty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  | /s/ANDREW SUKAWATYAndrew Sukawaty Chief Executive Officer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------

Date:
April 29, 2005

---



QuickLinks