alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         434,397
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,754
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     41,804
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               554,240
<PP&E>                                          65,873
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 620,113
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          231,359
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    100,000
<COMMON>                                        72,205
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,261,968
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   620,113
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               202,669
<CGS>                                           65,562
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  325,398
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (187,179)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (187,179)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (187,179)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
No. 96-1187

Osceola School District; * Marianna School District; * Dorothy Adams, as Next * Friend of Jonathan Adams, * a Minor; Janett Billups, * as Next Friend of * Jeremiah Billups, a Minor; * Janice Fraction, as * Next Friend of Delamar * Fraction, a Minor; and * Donald Littleton, as Next * Friend of Don Littleton, * a Minor, *
* Appellants, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Arkansas Activities * Association; Lamar Cole, * [UNPUBLISHED] Executive Director of the * Arkansas Activities * Association; and Scott Stone, * Roy Kirkland, Ed Sellers, * Bob Evans, Jerry Bush, * Charlotte Wright, Bobby Harper, * Richard Blevins, Calvin Estes, * Bill Barnes, John Selph, and * Charles Ferriter, Individually * and in Their Respective Official * Capacities as Members of the * Executive Committee of the * Arkansas Activities Association, *
* Appellees, *
* and *
* Arkansas State Board * of Education and * Arkansas Department of Education, *
* Defendants. *

### The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States Distric t 1 

### Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2- Submitted: September 13, 1996
Filed: October 4, 1996

Before McMILLIAN, MAGILL, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs appeal from the denial of a preliminary injunctio n against the Arkansas Activities Association, its executive director, and the member s of its executive committee. After a two-day hearing, th e distr ict court denied a motion for preliminary injunctive relief tha t 1
would have allowed two school districts to participate in the AA A classification for athletic competition.

In determining whether to issue a pr eliminary injunction, a district court must consider "(1) the threat of irreparab le harm to the movant; (2) the state of balance between this harm and the injury that granting th e injunction will inflict on other parties litigant; (3) the probability tha t [the] movant will succeed on the merits; and (4) the public interest. " Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. CL Systems, Inc. , 640 F.2d 109, 114 (8th Cir. 1981) ( en banc ). Our review of the district court's action in this case is for "an abuse of discretion or misplaced reli ance on an erroneous legal premise." Modern Com puter Systems, Inc. v. Modern Banking Systems, Inc. , 871 F.2d 734, 737 (8th Cir. 1989) ( en banc ).

We have read all of the materials submitted by the parties, inc luding the transcript of the hearing, and have considered the

### -3-

argume nts made. We grant the motion to supplement the appendix. W e conclude that the district court committed no error in applying th e Dataphase considerations to the case at hand and therefore affirm the orde r denyi ng a preliminary injunction. We remand the case for furthe r proceedings. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3942 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 3942

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 28, 2004

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

April 28, 2004_________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 7 Commercial Boulevard in Middletown, Rhode Island, as the ``Rhode 
                Island Veterans Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 7 
Commercial Boulevard in Middletown, Rhode Island, is hereby 
redesignated as the ``Rhode Island Veterans Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Rhode Island Veterans Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 27, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 70538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27936]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review Amended; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, November 11, 2014, 02:00 p.m. 
to November 11, 2014, 03:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the Federal 
Register on October 16, 2014, 79 FR 200 Pg. 62166.
    The meeting will be held on December 9, 2014 instead of November 
11, 2014. The meeting will start at 12:00 p.m. and will end at 2:00 
p.m. The meeting location remains the same. The meeting is closed to 
the public.

    Dated: November 20, 2014.
Carolyn A. Baum,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-27936 Filed 11-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.02


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our report
dated November 7, 1996 on the Provider Segment of Magellan Health Services,
Inc. and to all references to our Firm included in or made a part of this
Registration Statement.


                                                  ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
May 28, 1998
<PAGE>   1
                                                                CENTEX EXHIBIT 5



                                  May 29, 1998

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 5th Street, N.W., Judiciary Plaza
Washington, DC 20549

                  RE:      Centex Corporation Registration of 1,000,000 Shares
                           of Common Stock of Centex Corporation under the 
                           Centex Corporation 1998 Stock Option Plan

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         As Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, and Secretary for
Centex Corporation (the "Corporation"), I am familiar with the Centex
Corporation 1998 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") and the proposed offer and sale
of an additional 1,000,000 shares (the "Shares") of Common Stock, $0.25 par
value per share, of the Corporation pursuant to the Plan, which Shares trade in
tandem with beneficial interests in 1,000 shares (the "Holding Shares") of
Common Stock of 3333 Holding Corporation and beneficial interests in 900
warrants (the "CDC Warrants") to purchase Class B units of limited partnership
of Centex Development Company, L.P.

         I have also made such further investigations as I have deemed necessary
to express the opinions herein stated.

         I am of the opinion that the Shares (and the beneficial interests in
the Holding Shares and the CDC Warrants) which are hereafter issued upon
exercise of options duly granted under and in accordance with the terms of the
Plan will, upon the payment of the consideration therefor required by the terms
of the Plan, be duly and validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.

         I consent to the use of this opinion as an Exhibit to the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, with respect to the Shares and the
beneficial interests in the Holding Shares and the CDC Warrants issuable
thereunder, and to any references to me in such Registration Statement.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        /s/ RAYMOND G. SMERGE

                                        Raymond G. Smerge
                                        Executive Vice President, Chief Legal
                                        Officer, and Secretary
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PROFESSIONAL REVENUE RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant,

v.

DEERFIELD FLORIDA HOUSE INC., a Florida profit corporation

,

FLORIDA HOUSE PHYSICIANS GROUP, INC., a Florida profit corporation

, SUNLIGHT PHYSICIANS GROUP INC., a Florida profit corporation

, SUNLIGHT RECOVERY, INC., a Florida profit corporation

, SHERI STOU T, individually, and ADAM SMITH, individually

, Appellees.

No. 4D20

- 1248

[ December 31, 2020 ]

Appeal of non

- final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Carlos A. Rodriguez, Judge; L.T. Case

No. CACE19

- 010261.

Jeffrey B. Shalek and Gary S. Phillips of Phillips, Cantor and Shalek, P.A., Hollywood, for app ellant.

Kamal Sleiman, Michael G. Austin, and Joseph M. Wasserkrug of McDermott Will and Emery LLP, Miami, for appellees.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE , C.J., G ERBER and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4084 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4084

To suspend temporarily the duty on Benzenesulfonamide, N-(4-amino-9,10-
dihydro-3-methoxy-9,10-dioxo-1-anthracenyl)-; Benzenesulfonamide, N-(4-
   amino-9,10-dihydro-3-methoxy-9,10-dioxo-1-anthracenyl)-4-methyl-.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 31, 2004

  Mr. Baker introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on Benzenesulfonamide, N-(4-amino-9,10-
dihydro-3-methoxy-9,10-dioxo-1-anthracenyl)-; Benzenesulfonamide, N-(4-
   amino-9,10-dihydro-3-methoxy-9,10-dioxo-1-anthracenyl)-4-methyl-.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON BENZENESULFONAMIDE, N-(4-AMINO-9,10-
              DIHYDRO-3-METHOXY-9,10-DIOXO-1-ANTHRACENYL)-; 
              BENZENESULFONAMIDE, N-(4-AMINO-9,10-DIHYDRO-3-METHOXY-
              9,10-DIOXO-1-ANTHRACENYL)-4-METHYL-.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.33.71       Benzenesulfonamid  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         e, N-(4-amino-                                                     31/2007
                         9,10-dihydro-3-
                         methoxy-9,10-
                         dioxo-1-
                         anthracenyl)-;
                         Benzenesulfonamid
                         e, N-(4-amino-
                         9,10-dihydro-3-
                         methoxy-9,10-
                         dioxo-1-
                         anthracenyl)-4-
                         methyl- (CAS Nos.
                         69563-51-5 and 81-
                         68-5) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         3204.11.35)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit No. 31.1

CERTIFICATION UNDER RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT

OF 1934 FOR CABCO SERIES 2004-101 TRUST (GOLDMAN SACHS CAPITAL I)

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2013

I, George Baldwin,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports
filed in respect of the periods included in the year covered by this annual report, filed by Corporate Asset Backed Corporation, on behalf of CABCO Series 2004-101 Trust (Goldman Sachs Capital I);

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling
and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the
activities performed by the depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the
depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies
relating to the compliance by the trustee and the depositor with the minimum servicing standards or similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, as trustee.

Date: March 26, 2014



By:

/s/ George BaldwinName:

George BaldwinTitle:

Vice PresidentCorporate Asset Backed Corporation
H. Res. 484

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 24, 1998.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 4103) making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30,

1999, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill

shall be dispensed with. Points of order against consideration

of the bill for failure to comply with clause 2(l)(6) of rule XI,

clause 7 of rule XXI, or section 306 of the Congressional

Budget Act of 1974 are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member

of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the

bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute

rule. The amendments printed in the report of the Committee

on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as

adopted in the House and in the Committee of the Whole.
2

•HRES 484 EH

Points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, for

failure to comply with clause 2 or 6 of rule XXI are waived.

During consideration of the bill for further amendment, the

Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority

in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering

an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of

the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in

clause 6 of rule XXIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman of the Committee of the

Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without

intervening business, provided that the minimum time for

electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall

be 15 minutes. Consideration of section 8106 for amendment

under the five-minute rule shall not exceed one hour. At the

conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the

Committee shall rise and report the bill, as amended, to the

House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill

and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening
3

•HRES 484 EH

motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to Rules 13A-14 and 15D-14Of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

I, Jonathan Weiss,President and Chief Executive Officer of Time America, Inc. (the “Company”),certify that:

(1)           I have reviewed this Quarterly Reporton Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”);

(2)           Based on my knowledge, the Reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by the Report; and

(3)           Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in the Report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company as of, and for, the periods represented in theReport.

(4)           The Company’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the Company and have:

(a)           designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theCompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report isbeing prepared;

(b)           evaluated the effectiveness of theCompany’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in the Report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by the Report based on such evaluation; and

(c)           disclosed in the Report any change inthe Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

(5)           The Company’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and to the auditcommittee of the board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)           all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)           any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theCompany’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated:    February 14, 2007

| By:    |   | /s/ Jonathan Weiss                    |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Jonathan Weiss                        |   |
|   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

AF 06-0536

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPOINTMENT

TO THE DISTRICT COURT COUNCIL

ORDER

The term of District Court Council member the Honorable Gregory Todd expires

on June 30, 2021.

Pursuant to § 3-1-1602, MCA, an election was held by the Montana Judges

Association and Judge Todd as re-elected as the District Court Judge, Position 2 member

to the Council,

Now, therefore, I, Mike McGrath, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the State

of Montana, in accordance with the results of said procedure, do hereby CERTIFY that the

Honorable Gregory Todd was re-elected to the District Court Council as the District Court

Judge, Position 2 member, to a three-year term expiring on June 30, 2024,

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to the Montana Secretary of

State, to the Honorable Gregory Todd, to each member of the District Court Council, to

the State Bar of Montana, to Beth McLaughlin, Court Administrator, and to Shauna Ryan

at the Office of the Supreme Court Administrator.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have set my hand and caused the seal of this Court to

be affixed this `1121ay of May, 2021.

Chief Justice

FILED

'Airf 2 0 2021

05/20/2021

Case Number: AF 06-0536
#### STATE v. OLIVER

No. 100P97

Case below: 125 N.C.App. 420

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 May 1997.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

WILLIAM BROWN, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 198 WAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.