alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

                                MAXXAM INC.

                  PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

          Listed below are MAXXAM Inc.'s principal subsidiaries and the
jurisdiction of their incorporation or organization.  Certain subsidiaries
are omitted which, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary,
would not constitute a significant subsidiary.

                                                                  STATE OR
                                                                  PROVINCE
                                                              OF INCORPORATION
                                                                     OR
                            NAME                                ORGANIZATION
------------------------------------------------------------ -----------------

FOREST PRODUCTS OPERATIONS
     Britt Lumber Co., Inc.                                  California
     MAXXAM Group Inc.                                       Delaware
     Salmon Creek LLC                                        Delaware
     Scotia Pacific Company LLC                              Delaware
     The Pacific Lumber Company                              Delaware

REAL ESTATE OPERATIONS
     EagleRidge at Fountain Hills LLC                        Delaware
     FireRock Country Club LLC                               Arizona
     FireRock, LLC                                           Delaware
     LakePointe Assets LLC                                   Delaware
     MAXXAM Property Company                                 Delaware
     MCO FireRock L.L.C.                                     Delaware
     MCO Properties Inc.                                     Delaware
     MCO Properties L.P.                                     Delaware
     M-Six Penvest II Business Trust                         Delaware
     Palmas Country Club, Inc.                               Delaware
     Palmas del Mar Properties, Inc.                         Delaware
     Villas by the Beachfront Inc.                           Delaware

RACE PARK OPERATIONS
     Sam Houston Race Park, Ltd.                             Texas

OTHER
     MAXXAM Group Holdings Inc.                              Delaware
```
Project Lead, Infrastruc

Software & S

Information Techno
Enterprise

Enterprise

Hospital A

Emergency Room

Family Doctor

Patient Admin

A Healthcare Commun
Repository

Repository

Enterprise

Enterprise

Hospital A

Emergency Room

Family Doctor

Admin Patient

Registry
` Industry need identified – Electronic a

patient information to healthcare pro

` Prototype developed

◦ Refine concepts & engage community◦ Standard from e-commerce adapted for he

` IHE adoption of concept

◦ Authored profile & known as key subject-m

` Collaborate with early adopters to ref` NIST Prototype evolves into:

◦ Reference implementation◦ Test tool

` Technology expansion / adoption / r

IHE – Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise
Use Cases

Standards

Implem

Upda

Profile

Constraints

IHE Committee

activities
Publish

Profile Implement

T

ag

refe

Test

against

peers

Update

Interoperability

Test Eve

IHE Committee

activities
Repository

Enterprise

Enterprise

Hospital A

Emergency Room

Family Doctor (IBM)

Patient Admin

NIST

Registry/Repository

Reference

Implementation

NIST 

Test 

Tools

**Mention of commercial products or services in this presentation does not imply approval or endorsement by NIST, nor does it imply that such products or services are necessarily the best available for the purpose.

Where is XDS today?

` In the U.S. – adopted by HITSP, CCHIT, and th

implemented in emerging U.S. Health Inform

` Part of national healthcare infrastructure plan

◦ U.S., Canada, France, Austria, Germany, South 

` Also major developments in Italy, China, Japa` Between 50 and 60 vendors test XDS each ye

◦ GE Healthcare, IBM, Agfa, Siemens Healthcare

Misys/Allscripts, Intel, Oracle

` About a dozen product announcements in th` Vendor implementations (at test events) over 

◦ Registry 29◦ Repository 49◦ Client 70
NIST Contribution

` Original prototype that demonstrated effec

e-Commerce standard into healthcare envi

` Co-authored all 7 IHE profiles: Base profile` Develop/maintain reference implementatio

profiles

` Develop/maintain test facilities` Reference implementation is open source a` Continue as a primary architect of new deve

◦ Ongoing committee work◦ Research on future extensions 

` NIST reference implementation/test tools u

test events each year. NIST serves as testinEurope
TOP STATES

FACTS ABOUT MANUFACTURING 

12.3 MIILLION 

Total Manufacturing

Jobs in the U.S. 

$29.69 $Per Hour $1,197.90 

Average Hourly Average Weekly

Earnings Earning 

MANUFACTURING SALARY Manufacturing is the 6th Largest

6

Employer in the U.S. 

$ to U.S. GDP 

$2.7 TRILLION 

1. CALIFORNIA 

2. Texas 

3. Ohio 

1. INDIANA 

2. Wisconsin 

3. Iowa 

TOP STATES 

with largest 

manufacturing 

concentration 

with most 

Manufacturing Jobs 

Top Manufacturing Sectors with Most Manufacturing Jobs 

Food 

Transportation 

Fabricated Metal 

Trade Balance in 

Goods and Services 

Total amount the U.S. exported 

in manufacturing goods. 

of total U.S. exports are 

manufacturing goods 

55.2% 

-845 Billion 1.40 Trillion

GDP Resulting in manufacturers contributing 

11.3%

Manufacturing comprises 11.3% of our GDP 

As a major source of R&D

Manufacturing accounts for 

58% 

of U.S. Business Research and Development 

www.nist.gov/mep SOURCES: Federal Reserve Economic Data, Bureau of Economic Analysis, National / 1-800-MEP-4MFG Science Foundation, Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Census Bureau, Export.Gov, mep-national-network International Trade Administration
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Michael Marzette

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−05119

Honorable Mary M. Rowland

SP Plus Corporation

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, September 8, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: On or before 11/6/20, the

parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting

forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx

by clicking on Judge Rowland's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status

Conference.' The litigants are further ordered to review all of Judge Rowland's standing

orders and the information available on her webpage. The court will enter a scheduling

order in response. Mailed notice. (dm, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-05119 Document #: 9 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:162
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         200,737
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  195,809
<ALLOWANCES>                                    53,333
<INVENTORY>                                     14,841
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               367,136
<PP&E>                                         451,840
<DEPRECIATION>                                 288,590
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 851,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          677,964
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    953,520
<COMMON>                                         5,971
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,155,902)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   851,916
<SALES>                                        129,597
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               129,597
<CGS>                                           83,429
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   83,429
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               221,037
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              66,672
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (241,542)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (241,542)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Chicago & Vicinity Laborers' District Council

Pension Fund, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04995

Honorable Robert M.

Dow Jr.

Sonoma Construction, LLC

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, February 19, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Pursuant to the notice of

voluntary dismissal [19] filed on 2/17/2021, this case is voluntarily dismissed without

prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Telephone conference set for 3/17/2021 is

stricken. Civil case terminated. Emailed notice(cdh, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04995 Document #: 21 Filed: 02/19/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:54
H. R. 3939

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 14–

24 Abbott Road in Fair Lawn, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Mary Ann Collura Post

Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

14–24 Abbott Road in Fair Lawn, New Jersey, and known as

the Fair Lawn Main Post Office, shall be known and designated

as the ‘‘Mary Ann Collura Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Mary Ann

Collura Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 10. (d)

 

 

EXECUTION COPY

 

 

 

 

COINSURANCE AGREEMENT

 

between the

 

AETNA LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY COMPANY

 

(referred to as the Company)

 

and

 

LINCOLN LIFE & ANNUITY COMPANY OF NEW YORK

 

(referred to as the Reinsurer)

 

 

 

 

Dated as of October 1, 1998

 

 

----
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1




                        [Letterhead of Latham & Watkins]


                                  May 19, 1998









Chancellor Media Corporation
433 East Las Colinas Boulevard
Irving, Texas 75309

         Re:   Chancellor Media Corporation: Common Stock, par 
               value $.01 per share

Gentlemen;

         At your request, we have examined the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (the "Registration Statement"), which you intend to file with the Securities
and Exchange Commission in connection with the registration under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, of (i) 7,890,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $.01
per share (the "Plan Shares"), to be issued by Chancellor Media Corporation (the
"Company") under the 1998 Chancellor Media Corporation Stock Option Plan (the
"Plan"), and (ii) 450,000 shares of Common Stock (the "Director Plan Shares"), 
to be issued by the Company under the Company's Amended and Restated 
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (the "Director Plan").

         We are familiar with the proceedings undertaken in connection with the
adoption and approval by the Company of the Plan and the Director Plan.
Additionally, we have examined such questions of law and fact as we have
considered necessary or appropriate for purposes of this opinion.

         We are opining herein as to the effect on the subject transaction of
only the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and we express no
opinion with respect to the applicability thereto or the effect thereon of any
other laws or as to any matters of municipal law or any other local agencies
within any state.

         Subject to the foregoing and in reliance thereon, it is our opinion
that:



<PAGE>   2


LATHAM & WATKINS

May 19, 1998  
Page 2




         (i) upon the exercise of options granted pursuant to the Plan and
subject to the Company completing all actions and proceedings required on its
part to be taken prior to the issuance of the Plan Shares pursuant to the Plan
and the Registration Statement, including, without limitation, collection of
required payment for such shares, the Plan Shares will be validly issued, fully
paid and non-assessable securities of the Company; and

         (ii) upon the exercise of options granted pursuant to the Director Plan
and subject to the Company completing all actions and proceedings required on
its part to be taken prior to the issuance of the Director Plan Shares pursuant
to the Director Plan and the Registration Statement, including, without
limitation, collection of required payment for such shares, the Director Plan
Shares will be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable securities of the
Company.

         We consent to your filing this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement.


                                           Very truly yours,


                                           /s/ LATHAM & WATKINS
No. 87-5891.

#### Slater et ux. *v.*Delaware Trust Co. et al., Dean *v.*Georgia Department of Transportation et al., Embrey *v.*United States,

No. 87-6021.

No. 87-6081.

484 U. S. 1069; 484 U. S. 1070; and 484 U. S. 1072. Petitions for rehearing denied.
Privacy in Biometric System

IBPC 2012

Jonas Andersson

A&A Marine Vision AB
Privacy

• European Perspective

– Eurosmart Biometric White Paper

– BEST Network– Turbine Project
Privacy

• The right to privacy is the right to prote

property against search and seizure and 

control information about oneself.

– Profiling– Tracing– Function Creep– Accumulation of informatization of the bo

• Identity Theft
Intrinsical Privacy?

• Match On Card

• Revocable Biometrics• Secret Biometrics

• System on Card
Data Privacy Laws

• Local / National Laws no Harmonization

– No specific Biometrics coverage

• Is Biometrics Private Data

– Private – probably– Sensitive – question

• Sensitive

– Race, Gender, Health
Privacy through Procedur

• In January 2012, the European Commission adopte

proposals for reforming this current framework of Protection rules in the EU

– a Communication presenting the Commission's vision 

objectives : “A European Data Protection Framework f

21st century”;

– a Regulation proposal setting out a general EU framew

data protection ;

– a Directive proposal on protecting personal data proc

the purposes of prevention, detection, investigation oprosecution of criminal offences and related judicial a

• Require Privacy Impact Assessment for all biometr

systems proposed.
Documentation

• European Data Protection Supervisor (EDP• National Councils of Bioethics and Data

Protection Authorities;

• EU funded projects on ethics of biometric

• BITE [Biometric Identification Technology Ethics,20

• HIDE [Homeland security, biometric identification

detection ethics, 2008

‐2011],

• RISE [Rising panEuropean and International Aware

Biometrics and Security Ethics, 2009

‐2012],

• ACTIBIO ethical manual) and network of excellenc

networks (FIDIS, BEST);
No. 87-333.

#### Delta Air Lines, Inc. *v.*Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Summary of Fees Payable to Non-Employee Directors of Quest Software, Inc.



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENT FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS 
  
 Non-employee directors of Quest Software, Inc. receive an annual retainer of $30,000 for serving on the Board of Directors,
and are reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred by them in attending board and committee meetings. In addition (a) the chairman of our Audit Committee receives an additional $20,000 annual fee and each other member of the Audit Committee
receives an additional $10,000 annual fee; (b) the chairman of our Compensation Committee receives an additional $10,000 annual fee and each other member of the Compensation Committee receives an additional $5,000 annual fee; and (c) the
chairman of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives an additional $7,500 annual fee and each other member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives an additional $5,000 annual fee. 
  
 Non-employee directors are permitted to elect to receive the annual board and
committee fees described above in the form of stock options, in lieu of cash, pursuant to the director fee option grant program in our 1999 Stock Incentive Plan. Non-employee directors also receive options to purchase 50,000 shares of Quest common
stock on the date of their election to the Board of Directors, at an exercise price equal to the fair market value on such date, pursuant to the provisions of the automatic option grant program under our 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the
“Automatic Grant Program”). In addition, non-employee directors who have served on the Board of Directors since the date of the prior year’s annual meeting of shareholders also receive options to purchase 15,000 shares of Quest common
stock pursuant to the Automatic Grant Program on the date of our annual meeting of shareholders, at an exercise price equal to the fair market value on such date.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed November 19, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00996

- CV

MARK NUSBAUM, CHRIS CLARK, AND LEAD EQUITY GROUP, L LC , Appellants

V. WELLINGTON REALTY, L LC, WRC ADVISORS, LL C,

AND DAVID SHAFFER , Appellees

On Appeal from the 95th District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 18

- 18742



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Whitehill, and Justice Schenck

Opi nion by Justice Schenck
Before the Court is appellants’ motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1). T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). W e grant appellants’ motion and

dismiss this appeal. See id

.

190996F.P05 /David J. Schenck/
DAVID J. SCHENCK
JUSTICE– 2

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

MARK NUSBAUM, CHRIS CLARK, AND LEAD EQUITY GROUP, LLC, Appellants

No. 05

- 19

- 00996

- CV V.

WELLINGTON REALTY, LLC, WRC ADVISORS, LLC, AND DAVID SHAFFER, Appellees On Appeal from the 95th District Court, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 18

- 18742. Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck. Chief
Justice Burns and Justice Whitehill participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

Subject to any agreement between the parties, it is ORDERED that appellees WELLINGTON REALTY, LLC, WRC ADVISORS, LLC

, AND DAVID SHAFFER recover their costs of this appeal from appellants MARK NUSBAUM, CHRIS CLARK, AND LEAD EQUITY GROUP, LLC.

Judgment entered this 19 th day of November, 2019

.
**EXHIBIT 31.01**

**RULE13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Edward Rzeszowski,,certify that:

1. I have reviewed thisreport on Form 10-Q of BlackRock Futures Investments L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge,this  report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)  Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)  Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweakness in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14,2006

----

| By /s/ EDWARD RZESZOWSKI      |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| Edward Rzeszowski             |
| President                     |
| (Principal Executive Officer) |

** **

 

1

----