alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### M. S. Lane *v.*City *of*Louisville.

Damages — Speculative—Pleading.

Where the averments of a petition do not import any certain and specific complaint that plaintiff sustained any damages which were natural and proximate to the 'breach of the contract complained of, hut was for contingent and prospective profits or speculative damages, recovery can not he had. .

APPEAL ERiOM. JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT.

December 30, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Hardin :

Although it is alleged in the petition in general terms, in effect at least, that the appellant was subjected to loss and injury by the failure of the appellee to obtain the right of way and make other pre*179liminary arrangements to enable the appellant to proceed to execute his contract, and it may be inferred, and is even probable from the evidence that the disappointment was injurious to him, particularly as the contract might have resulted profitably to him, if he could have executed it, yet the averments of the petition do not import any certain and specific complaint, nor is there proof of any, if made, that the plaintiff sustained any damage which was natural and proximate to the breach of the contract by the appellee.

*Elliott, James Harlem, for appellant.*

*T. L. Burnett, for appellee.*

There is no allegation or proof that laborers were employed, or that stock, implements, or other means were provided, or that any preparatory expense was incurred by plaintiff on the faith of the contract, from which any loss was devolved on him' by the noncompliance of the city with its part of the contract.

The claim, as presented, was therefore simply for an alleged loss of contingent and prospective profits, or in other words, speculative damages; for which, it is well settled, by the authorities referred to in the opinion of the lower court, and others which might be cited, an action can not be maintained. We concur in that opinion also, that the plaintiff was not entitled t0' a recovery of even nominal damages; because by the specifications of the engineer, made part of the contract, the work was not to' be commenced until after the right of way should be obtained, which was not done, and as it appears the city was unable to do; and as suggested in the opinion of the court, these facts operated to discharge both parties from the contract.

Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed.*
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15



August 11, 1999


Koger Equity, Inc.
8880 Freedom Crossing Trail
Jacksonville, Florida 32256


We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Koger Equity, Inc. and subsidiaries for the periods ended June
30, 1999 and 1998, as indicated in our report dated July 30, 1999, because we
did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on such financial information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-55179 of Koger
Equity, Inc. on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-54617 of Koger Equity,
Inc. on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-20975 of Koger Equity, Inc. on
Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-23429 of Koger Equity, Inc. on Form S-8
and Registration Statement No. 333-37919 of Koger Equity, Inc. on Form S-3.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statements prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.






DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Jacksonville, Florida
United States Department of Com

National Institute of Standards and Technolo

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For: 

Idaho 

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international 

system of units (SI), maintains a documented calibration program, documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully completed training and proficiency tests, submitted a quality management system, andhas demonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate. 

The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope 

Mass Echelon II Mass Echelon III Volume Gravimetric, I 

30 kg to 1 mg 30 kg to 1 mg 5 gal

1000 lb to 0.001 lb 2500 lb to 0.001 lb

8 oz to 0.03125 oz 8 oz to 0.03125 oz Volume Transfer, II 

750 gal to 5 gal

Weight Carts __________

3000 lb to 2000 lb Volume Transfer, II LPG Katrice Lipp

100 gal to 20 gal NIST Office 

Effective Dat

(Rev.: September 2021)
```
Cendant Mortgage Corporation  Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
Series 2004-3
```

```
Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions to
Certificateholders for 2004
```

```
Class   Interest            Principal PaidRealized    Ending Balance
        Distribution                      Losses
```

```
A1      389,998.93          485,899.11    0.00        13,054,953.89
A2      747,744.97          929,565.22    0.00        22,717,166.78
A3      787,917.20          1,232,632.86  0.00        23,796,670.14
A4      1,260,667.56        1,972,212.64  0.00        38,074,673.36
A5      0.00                0.00          0.00        9,280,106.69
A6      0.00                0.00          0.00        5,044,981.33
A7      0.00                0.00          0.00        6,035,557.40
A8      0.00                0.00          0.00        14,990,941.29
B1      216,668.36          50,795.67     0.00        6,699,607.33
B2      25,627.45           6,008.10      0.00        792,426.90
B3      13,978.61           3,277.15      0.00        432,232.85
B4      9,319.06            2,184.75      0.00        288,155.25
B5      6,989.31            1,638.57      0.00        216,116.43
B6      6,989.31            1,638.57      0.00        216,116.40
RI      0.46                100.00        0.00        0.00
RII     0.46                100.00        0.00        0.00
```
Exhibit 13.2

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of LG Display Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: April 26, 2013



/s/ James JeongJames (Hoyoung) JeongDirector, Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 has been provided to LG Display Co., Ltd. and will be retained by LG Display Co., Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### R. P. Miles *v.*J. K. Bayles.

Costs — Judgment for.

Under R. S., p. 288, eh. 25, § 16, relating to costs, the party who succeeds in recovering judgment in an action is entitled to a judgment for costs.

APPEAL FROM WASHINGTON CIRCUIT COURT.

January 23, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

Chapter 25, Sec. 13, Revised Statutes, page 288 (Ky. Statutes, Sec. 889), contains the following provisions: The party succeeding in any civil suit or action, on the merits or otherwise, shall recover costs unless differently provided, etc., etc.

This provision of the statute makes no exception on account of the amount recovered. The party who succeeds in the suit or action in the recovery of a judgment, be it ever so small, is entitled to costs. *Brandies v. Stewart, etc.,*1 Met. 395. The court below, therefore, erred in adjudging to appellee cost, which is the only error prejudicial to appellant in the judgment and proceedings complained of. But for the error in adjudging costs to- appellee the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded with directions to award to appellant his full costs in that court.

By an act approved March 10, 1854, 1 Vol. R. S., page 294 (Ky. Statutes, Sec. 891), this court has a discretion in awarding costs incurred here as may seem just and proper, and as the judgment *387complained of is only reversed in part, it seems proper that each party should pay his own costs in this court and the clerk will tax the costs accordingly.

*L. R. Thompson, Hays, for appellant.*

/. S’. *Ray, for appellee.*
EXHIBIT 4

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 330-4 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:7871
Document title: Amazon

Capture URL: https://sellercentral.amazon.com/gp/help/help.html?itemID=G9W7FVTLY343ZBKN&

Capture timestamp (UTC): Thu, 08 Jul 2021 17:06:54 GMT Page 1 of 2

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 330-4 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:7872
Document title: Amazon

Capture URL: https://sellercentral.amazon.com/gp/help/help.html?itemID=G9W7FVTLY343ZBKN&

Capture timestamp (UTC): Thu, 08 Jul 2021 17:06:54 GMT Page 2 of 2

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 330-4 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:7873
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 30, 2015

No. 04-15-00485-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.L.B., et al.

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-02-0060-CVW

Honorable Melissa Uram-Degerolami, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion issued this date, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR 

WANT OF JURISDICTION. 

It is so ORDERED on September 30, 2015.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of September, 2015.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 15, 2022

No. 04-22-00241-CV

WOODLAND RIDGE,

Appellant

v.

Allison WALLACE-BLODGETT,

Appellee

From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CV04742

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due to be filed by June 6, 2022. Neither the brief nor a motion for 

extension of time has been filed. Appellant is therefore ORDERED to file, no later than June 

27, 2022, its brief and a written response reasonably explaining: (1) its failure to timely file a 

brief, and (2) why appellee is not significantly injured by appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. 

If appellant fails to timely file a brief and the written response by June 27, 2022, we will dismiss 

the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) 

(allowing involuntary dismissal if appellant fails to comply with court order).

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of June, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-23-00212-CV 

 

IN THE INTEREST OF X.R. AND X.A., CHILDREN 

On Appeal from the 320th District Court 

Potter County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 097429-D-FM, Honorable Carry A. Baker, Associate Judge Presiding 

July 26, 2023 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH, JJ. 

In January 2023, the Department of Family and Protective Services filed suit to 

terminate the parental rights of M.V. to her children, X.R. and X.A.1 M.V. is represented 

in the proceedings by appointed trial counsel. On June 13, 2023, the Department filed a 

“Permanency Report to the Court–Temporary Managing Conservatorship,” 

recommending, among other things, that the Department continue to serve as temporary 

managing conservators of the children. A day later, M.V. and S.P., relationship unknown, 

1 To protect the children’s privacy, we refer to Appellants and the children by their initials. See TEX.

FAM. CODE ANN. § 109.002(d); TEX. R. APP. P. 9.8(a)(b).
2

filed a notice of appeal, pro se, from the purported “denial of placement of the children . . 

. with relatives.” We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

We have jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a final judgment or from an 

interlocutory order made immediately appealable by statute. See Lehmann v. Har-Con

Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); Stary v. DeBord, 967 S.W.2d 352, 352–53 (Tex. 

1998) (per curiam). Here, the trial court has not entered a final judgment or an appealable 

interlocutory order. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 109.002(b) (permitting appeals from final 

orders); In the Interest of A.J., No. 02-11-00442-CV, 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 476, at *1–2 

(Tex. App.—Fort Worth Jan. 19, 2012, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op.) (holding that a 

permanency hearing order is neither a final judgment nor an appealable interlocutory 

order).

By letter of June 23, 2023, we notified Appellants that it did not appear that a final 

judgment or appealable order had been issued by the trial court and directed them to 

show how we have jurisdiction over this appeal. M.V. filed a response and an “amended 

appeal” but has not demonstrated grounds for continuing the appeal.

Because Appellants have not presented this Court with a final judgment or 

appealable order, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.3(a).

Per Curiam
EXHIBIT 31.1
IEA Income Fund IX, L.P.
Rule 13a-14 CERTIFICATION
     I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IEA Income FundIX, L.P. (the “Registrant”);
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), theGeneral Partner of the Registrant, and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:
          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; and
          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, based on ourevaluation; and
          (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of Registrant’s Board ofDirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: May 14, 2004
/s/ DENNIS J TIETZDennis J Tietz
Monday, September 28, 2020 at 14:42:26 Eastern Daylight Time 

Subject: 12 Dra' NISTIR 8312 

Date: Thursday, September 17, 2020 at 1:04:41 AM Eastern Daylight Time 

From: Anup Chandra 

To: NIST Explainable AI 

The proposed draft is good. 

The references given are also good .This has to be read for wide acceptance 

Four principles are acceptable 

They are many suggestions but few observations are 

make separate draft for 

1. Gradient-Weighted Class Activation Mapping (GRAD-CAM) based tool [82]. 

2.Machine Learning Algorithms include Decision Trees and Linear and Logistic Regression

3. Generalized Additive Mod455 els with Pairwise Interactions (GA2M),

4. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations)

5. TCAV (Testing with Concept Ac479 tivation Vectors) [107].

Partial Dependence Plots 485 (PDPs) and Individual Conditional Expectation (ICE) [60, 104].

7. ICE curves, 

8 LIME (Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explainer) 

9.Dunning-Kruger Effect 

if there is ASTM/ISO/ANSI statistical standards for these terms( it can mentioned in standar publised) 

Thanks for asking suggestions 

ANUP CHANDRA 

H 403 AFV RESIDENCY 

DAHEGAM ROAD 

CHILODA 

DIST AGNDINGAR 

INDIA 

382355 

Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Maui
Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1996 and the
Statement of Operations for the year then ended, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             453
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,343
<ALLOWANCES>                                       698
<INVENTORY>                                     16,484
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,308
<PP&E>                                         190,999
<DEPRECIATION>                                 104,389
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,841
<BONDS>                                         28,898
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,318
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   132,851
<SALES>                                        106,666
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               136,335
<CGS>                                           75,279
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   99,309
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,123)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (376)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (747)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (747)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.42)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) 
UNAUDITED INTERIM STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 29, 1996 AND 
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) QUARTERLY REPORT ON 
FORM - 10QSB FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED FEBRUARY 29, 1996
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-1996
<CASH>                                         830,289
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    148,426
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               996,996
<PP&E>                                         282,078
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,083,423
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          142,978
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           292
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,099,376
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,078,123
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,593
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,760,015
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,734,422)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,734,422)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,734,422)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**Walter Industries, Inc.Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200218 U.S.C. Section 1350**

In connection withthe accompanying Annual Report of Walter Industries, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 (the“Report”), I, Joseph J. Troy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: May 9, 2007 |     |                      |
|------------------------|----------|---------------------------|
| * *               | * * | /s/ JOSEPH J. TROY        |   |
|                   |     | Joseph J. Troy            |
|                   |     | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----