alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.2



|                                                                                                                  |  |                                                                                                                                  |  |               |                                                                                      |  |                                                                          |  |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  | 
|United States                                                                                                     |  | LOGO 12750 Merit Drive Suite 510 Park Central 7 Dallas, Texas 75251 Telephone: (972) 994-9100 www.american-appraisal.com         |  | International
|Atlanta Boston Buffalo Charlotte Chicago Cincinnati Dallas Denver Detroit Houston Irvine Jacksonville Los Angeles |  | Milwaukee Minneapolis New Orleans New York Oak Lawn Philadelphia Pittsburgh Princeton Schaumburg St. Louis San Francisco Seattle |  |               | BrazilCanadaChinaCroatiaCzech RepublicEnglandGermanyGreeceHong KongHungaryItalyJapan |  | MexicoMoroccoPhilippinesPortugalRussiaSpainTaiwanThailandTurkeyVenezuela

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT APPRAISER

American Appraisal Associates, Inc. (AAA) hereby consents to the incorporation by reference of its conclusions of value in Form 10-K. Specifically, AAA
consents to Grande Communications Holdings, Inc.s disclosure of AAA as its valuation consultant in Grande Communications Holdings, Inc.s 2006 Form 10-K. In giving this consent AAA does not hereby admit that it comes within the category
of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or as an expert as defined by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                                    |  |                       
|----------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|AMERICAN APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
|                                    | 
|By:                                 |  | LOGO                  
|                                    |  | Mark L. Winger Manager



Dallas,
Texas

March 22, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,055,315
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  533,907
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,589,222
<PP&E>                                      16,658,916
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,663,538
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,584,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,743
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,579,857
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,584,600
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,523,822
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  766,403
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   799,662
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### N OTICE OF 

### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 14

- 00193

- CV

Style: Fertitta Hospitality, LLC

v Brandon A. Backe, Joseph P. Belluomini, Shannon Belluomini, Chris Cornwell,

Matthew L. Goodson, Michael R. McMiillan, Daniel Cole O'Balle, Gilbert E. OBalle, Jr.,

Justin Packard, Calvin Silva, Aaron Trevino and Charles Young

Date motion filed * : August 1, 2014

Type of motion: Motion of Appellant Fertitta Hospitality, LLC to Extend Time to File Its Reply Brief

Pursuant to Rule 10.5(b)

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Appellant's Reply Brief

If motion to extend time:

Deadline to file document:

Number of previous extensions granted:

Length of extension sought:

Ordered that motion is:

Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

The Clerk is instructed to file the document as of the date of this order

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Cour t will not grant additional motions to extend

time

Denied

Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

Appellant’s motion to extend the time to file its reply brief is GRANTED. Accordingly, Appellee

Daniel Cole O’Balle’s motion to strike appellant’s reply brief is DENIED.

Judge's signature: /s/ Jane Bland

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: September 4, 2014
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of Miller Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending April 30, 2017
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marc Napolitano,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                                                                                    |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Dated: October 31, 2017                                                             |  | 
|/s/  Marc Napolitano                                                                |  | 
|Marc Napolitano
        Chief Executive Officer and
        Chief Financial Officer |  | 





A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Miller Industries, Inc.
and will be returned by Miller Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 3

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-3 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:73
EXHIBIT 3

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-3 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 2 of 10 PageID #:74
EXHIBIT 3

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-3 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 3 of 10 PageID #:75
EXHIBIT 3

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-3 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 4 of 10 PageID #:76
EXHIBIT 3

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-3 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 5 of 10 PageID #:77
EXHIBIT 3

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-3 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 6 of 10 PageID #:78
EXHIBIT 3

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-3 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 7 of 10 PageID #:79
EXHIBIT 3

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-3 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 8 of 10 PageID #:80
EXHIBIT 3

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-3 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 9 of 10 PageID #:81
EXHIBIT 3

Case: 1:20-cv-05264 Document #: 4-3 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 10 of 10 PageID #:82
Virtual Meeting

February 9, 2022

Manufacturing Extension Partnership

Visiting Committee on Advanced Technology 

Pravina Raghavan

Director, Manufacturing Extension Partnership
Virtual Meeting

February 9, 2022

MEP Director

Pravina Raghavan
MEP National NetworkTM interacted with 34,307 U.S. 

manufacturers from nearly all mfg industries

Nearly 9,000 MEP clients completed the survey

• $14.4B in new and retained sales

• 125,746 jobs created or retained

• $5.2B in total investment

• $1.5B in cost savings

CARES ACT Results through CY21

• MEP Centers served 5,221 companies with 7,187 

CARES Act-funded projects

• 2,266 companies received MEP services for the

first time as a result

• 2021 DOC Organizational Gold Medal to NIST MEP

MEP 2021 Accomplishments

3
MEP 2022 Priorities

Image credit: Shutterstock

MEP National Network FY2023-2028 strategic planning process underway

4

Proposed MEP program expansion

• Supply Chain

• Workforce

• Technology & Innovation

Ongoing discussion with MEP National Network to align on the future plans
DISCUSSION
<TABLE>
                                                                                      Exhibit 12



                                         THE MAY DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                         COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                          FOR THE FIVE FISCAL YEARS ENDED FEBRUARY 1, 2003

 (Dollars in Millions)                                           Fiscal Year Ended
                                               Feb. 1,     Feb. 2,    Feb. 3,   Jan.29,   Jan.30,
                                                 2003        2002       2001      2000      1999

<S>                                            <C>         <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>
Earnings Available for Fixed Charges:
Pretax earnings from continuing operations     $  820      $1,139     $1,402    $1,523    $1,395
Fixed charges (excluding interest
  capitalized and pretax preferred stock
  dividend requirements)                          405         411        406       346       344
Dividends on ESOP Preference Shares               (20)        (22)       (23)      (24)      (25)
Capitalized interest amortization                   9           8          8         7         7
                                                1,214       1,536      1,793     1,852     1,721

Fixed Charges:
Gross interest expense (a)                     $  392      $  401     $  395    $  340    $  339
Interest factor attributable to
  rent expense                                     36          32         28        22        21
                                                  428         433        423       362       360

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                2.8         3.5        4.2       5.1       4.8


(a)  Represents interest expense on long-term and short-term debt, ESOP debt and amortization of debt
     discount and debt issue expense.

</TABLE>
From: Greg Hutchins 

To: aiframework 

Subject: Response to NIST AI Risk RMF 

Date: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 10:49:29 PM 

Attachments: Quality + Engineering - NIST AI response.pdf 

Hello: 

The NIST AI RMF is a very important initiative. Please find our response to the NIST AI 

RMF attached to this email. 

Reach out to us if we can provide additional information. Best, 

Greg Hutchins PE CERM 

CERMAcademy.com 

1800Compete.com 

WorkingIt.com 

QualityPlusEngineering.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

    <PAGE>
  
  <ARTICLE>     UT
  <LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
             FROM THE BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME,
             RETAINED EARNINGS AND CASH FLOWS OF MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC
             COMPANY, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
             FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
  <CIK>    0000063073
  <NAME>   Massachusetts Electric Company
  <MULTIPLIER>  1,000
         
  <S>                                                                 <C>
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1996              
  <PERIOD-END>                     DEC-31-1996
  <PERIOD-TYPE>                         12-MOS
  <BOOK-VALUE>                        PER-BOOK
  <TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>          1,088,430
  <OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                0
  <TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>               235,809
  <TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>              66,019                 <F1>
  <OTHER-ASSETS>                             0
  <TOTAL-ASSETS>                     1,390,258
  <COMMON>                                59,953
  <CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>            201,172
  <RETAINED-EARNINGS>                  165,936
  <TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>       427,061
  <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
  <PREFERRED>                           50,000
  <LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                 343,321
  <SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                     5,275
  <LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                  0
  <COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>        38,500
  <LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>         30,000
  <PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                  0
  <CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                0
  <LEASES-CURRENT>                           0
  <OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>       496,101
  <TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      1,390,258
  <GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>          1,538,537
  <INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                  25,186
  <OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         1,441,390
  <TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>         1,466,576
  <OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>               71,961
  <OTHER-INCOME-NET>                    (1,213)
  <INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>        70,748
  <TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>              32,822
  <NET-INCOME>                          37,926
  <PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>            3,114
  <EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>         34,812
  <COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>              19,184
  <TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>             27,089
  <CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>               102,919
  <EPS-PRIMARY>                              0                 <F2>
  <EPS-DILUTED>                              0                 <F2>
  <FN>
  <F1>                              Total deferred charges includes other assets.
  <F2>                              Per share data is not relevant because the Company's common stock is
                                      wholly-owned by New England Electric System.
  </FN>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4232 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 4232

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 7, 2004

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 4025 Feather Lakes Way in Kingwood, Texas, as the ``Congressman Jack 
                         Fields Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4025 
Feather Lakes Way in Kingwood, Texas, and known as the Kingwood Post 
Office, is hereby redesignated as the ``Congressman Jack Fields Post 
Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Congressman Jack Fields Post 
Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 6, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 09, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 09, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18A0604. TAX RELIEF INVESTMENT, LP v. BANK OF AMERICA, N. A..
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
Author: Mike Bergman

The idea is to organize the Report around these themes. The executive summary would cite 

these themes; the work in the Report would be organized under these themes.

(Draft) IoT Policy Theme

1. Enhance and Modernize The Infrastructure That Supports IoT: Leads to: More licensed 

and unlicensed spectrum for broadband and narrowband deployment of IoT

a. Subgroups: Spectrum

2. Create Trust in IoT in All Market Categories: Leads to: Security, privacy, transparency, 

data usage (trust and privacy), data management (security)

a. Subgroups: Privacy/Data Ownership; Security

3. Ensure Supply Chain Reliability: Leads to: Free up and enable trade; support industrymanaged reshoring; traceability for anti-counterfeit/anti-tampering

a. Subgroups: Augmented Logistics and Smart Supply Chains

4. Address Challenges in the Context of An Ecosystem that is Global: Leads to: As 

important as the U.S. economy and domestic priorities are, it is a global picture and 

needs to be viewed as such.

a. Subgroups: International Engagement

b. E.g., Data Sovereignty (is there a better way to treat this, or even “Data” itself?)

5. Align Federal Actions in IoT to Advance Policy Goals: 

a. Subgroups: Environmental Monitoring; Healthcare, Smart Traffic and Transit 

Technologies; Sustainable and Critical Infrastructure; Precision Agriculture

b. Climate change (policy), environmental monitoring (IoT application); 

c. Sustainability (policy), precision agriculture (IoT application)

d. Adopt further “Lab to Market” policies for federally-funded research

6. Enable a Strong and Diverse Workforce: Leads to: Workforce training; consumer 

awareness; diversity & inclusiveness

a. Subgroups: (All should consider & develop content here)
October 2014 

GMP 2 Page 1 of 2 

GMP 2 

Good Measurement Practice 

for 

Reading the Center of Graduations when using a Microscope 

1. The microscope furnished to State laboratories with the length bench has a reticle on which 

each graduation represents 0.002 inch which must have a suitable calibration from an 

accredited supplier to ensure metrological traceability to the International System of Units 

(SI). The difference in length between two tapes is measured from the center of the 

graduations of interest. The tape should be placed on the length bench such that the reading 

edge of the tape partially covers the graduations marked on the length bench. Place the 

microscope so that both the edges of the tape and the edge of the bench graduations are in the 

field-of-vision of the microscope, preferably near the center, and within reading range of the 

graduated reticle. Position the microscope so that part of the graduations on the reticle 

overlaps the bottom portion of the graduation on the tape and part overlaps the graduation on 

the length bench. See Figure 1 for illustration. Do not move or refocus the microscope once 

the comparison between the unknown, X, and standard, S, has begun. 

Figure 1. Graduated reticle overlapping tape and bench graduations. 

2. Determine the center of a graduation by first determining the width of the graduation, 

dividing the width by two and adding this value to the reticle reading for the left edge of the 

graduation. In the illustration above, let the length bench be the standard, S, and the tape be 

the unknown, X. The left edge of the tape graduation is at 206 (0.206 inch); the right edge is 

at 216 (0.216 inch). The width of the graduation is 0.010 inch. Adding half this value to 206 

(0.206 inch), gives the center of the graduation at 211 (0.211 inch). Following the same 

procedure for the length bench graduation shows the left edge of the graduation at 190 (0.190 

inch) and the right edge at 197 (0.197 inch). The center of the graduation is 193.5 (0.193 5 

inch). The difference between the two tapes is 211 – 193.5, which is 17.5 (0.211 inch – 0.193 

5 inch = 0.017 5 inch). Since X is longer than S, d is positive. Using the equation X – S = d, 

X – S = 0.017 5 inch or X = S + 0.017 5 inch 

 
October 2014 

GMP 2 Page 2 of 2 

3. If it is necessary to calibrate a rigid rule to the end of the rule, the edge of ends of the rule are 

reference points for the measurement. In these cases, there will be only a single value read 

from the microscope reticle for each end of the rule since the center of graduation is assumed 

to be the end of the rules.