alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4176

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostGentry Post Office Building’’. Raeford, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Bobby Marshall al Service located at 122 West Elwood Avenue in

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4176

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 122 West Elwood Avenue in Raeford, North

Carolina, as the ‘‘Bobby Marshall Gentry Post Office

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4176 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 122 West Elwood Avenue in Raeford, North

4 Carolina, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Bobby

5 Marshall Gentry Post Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Bobby Marshall Gentry Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 18, 2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BOBBY JEHU STROUP,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

GREGORY MARTIN; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-17247

D.C. No. 3:10-cv-00562-HDMWGC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Howard D. McKibben, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 24, 2013** 

Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Nevada state prisoner Bobby Jehu Stroup appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate

indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.

FILED

OCT 04 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-17247

2004). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Stroup failed

to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants acted with

deliberate indifference to his stomach pain, which was eventually diagnosed as a

peptic ulcer. See id. at 1060 (“Deliberate indifference is a high legal standard. A

showing of medical malpractice or negligence is insufficient to establish a

constitutional deprivation under the Eighth Amendment.”); Jackson v. McIntosh,

90 F.3d 330, 332 (9th Cir. 1996) (to establish that a difference of opinion

amounted to deliberate indifference, a prisoner must show that the defendants’

chosen course of treatment was medically unacceptable and in conscious disregard

of an excessive risk to the prisoner’s health).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by considering and discussing

Stroup’s sealed medical records in connection with defendants’ motion for

summary judgment. See Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172,

1178-80, 1182 (9th. Cir. 2006) (setting forth standard of review and discussing the

“compelling reasons” requirement for sealing records attached to a dispositive

motion).

We do not consider Stroup’s allegations concerning defendant Martin’s

follow-up care from October 2008 to February 2009 because Stroup expressly
3 12-17247

states in his opening brief that those allegations are not part of the claim at issue in

this appeal.

AFFIRMED.
#### BAYNOR v. COOK

No. 78P97

Case below: 125 N.C.App. 274

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 June 1997.
10964.

#### Brewington v. The State.

Decided December 12, 1919.

Conviction of involuntary manslaughter; from Jasper superior court—Judge Park. September 34, 1919.

*A. S. Tliwrman,*for plaintiff in error.

*Doyle Campbell, solicitor-general,*contra.

Luke, J.

1. On the trial of a father for the murder of his minor son, where the evidence shows that the homicide was committed by the defendant by shooting the decedent with a pistol after having struck him upon the head with the same weapon, it is not error for the court to fail to instruct the jury as to the law of involuntary manslaughter in the commission of a lawful act. Parental authority to chastise a wayward child does not extend to such a use of such a weapon.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict finding the defendant guilty of involuntary manslaughter in the commission of an unlawful act, and no error of law appears from the record.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
Exhibit
31.2




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


Rule
13a–14(a)/15d–14(a) Certification




I,
Clifford L. Flowers, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify
that:





1.           I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
February 29, 2008 of Patriot Scientific Corporation;





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4.           The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





(c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.           The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:
April 9, 2008








/s/
      Clifford L.
      FlowersClifford L.
      FlowersChief Financial
      Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS





We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on
Form S-8 of our report dated February 10, 1998, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of Medical Alliance, Inc. and Subsidiaries as
of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996
and 1995, which report is included in the Company's 1997 Annual Report on Form
10-K.





                                                      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP




Dallas, Texas
July 22, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         355,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,982,800
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,575,600)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,878,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,340,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,395,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,878,100
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               733,800
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  440,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              95,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                197,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   197,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .67
        

</TABLE>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-12T00:46:47Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-12T00:46:51Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-12T00:46:51Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="82181">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="2">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-12T00:46:47Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>OFFICE OF THE ATTORN~EY GENERAL OF.:TEXAS ‘. 
AUSTIN 
</p>
<p>&OVER SELLERS 
ql-rol~~rr GCHCRAL </p>
<p></p>
</div>
<div class="page"><p></p>
<p>t 
</p>
<p>. . . ,,. _” __ - </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of American Power Conversion Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10 Q for the period ending March 27, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rodger B. Dowdell,Jr., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Rodger B. Dowdell,  Jr.                      |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                             |
| Rodger B. Dowdell, Jr.                           |
| Chairman, President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

May 6, 2005

 

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separatedisclosure document.

 

1

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT COURT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

Rindi Septi Coriah Nurwulan, CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:20-cv-04000

Administrator of the Estate of 

JUNIOR PRIADI, Deceased, et. al.,

Plaintiff, 

v.

THE BOEING COMPANY, a corporation, Assigned for all purposes to the 

Hon. Ronald A. Guzman

Defendant.

NOTICE OF LIEN FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD 

HEREIN:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Kabateck LLP, Sanjiv N. Singh, PLC and Indrajana Law 

Group hereby assert a claim for attorneys’ fees and costs against any recovery by Plaintiff Rindi 

Septi Coriah Nurwulan, Administrator of the Estate of JUNIOR PRIADI, Deceased from any 

defendant in this matter, whether such recovery is by way of settlement, award or judgment by 

virtue Kabateck LLP, Sanjiv N. Singh, PLC, and Indrajana Law Group’s representation of 

Plaintiff Rindi Septi Coriah Nurwulan, Administrator of the Estate of JUNIOR PRIADI, 

Deceased concerning the same claims that are at issue in the above-referenced matter. 

///

///

///

///

Case: 1:20-cv-04000 Document #: 2 Filed: 07/09/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:14
2

An itemized statement will be presented upon request and/or at the time of settlement, award or 

judgment. 

Dated: July 9, 2020 KABATECK LLP

 By: /s/ Brian S. Kabateck

Brian S. Kabateck (pro hac vice)

Christopher B. Noyes (pro hac vice)

KABATECK LLP

633 West 5th Street, Suite 3200

Los Angeles, California 90071

Phone: (213) 217-5000

Fax: (213) 217-5010

bsk@kbklawyers.com

cn@kbklawyers.com 

One of the Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case: 1:20-cv-04000 Document #: 2 Filed: 07/09/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:15
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned, counsel of record, certifies that he served the foregoing document upon 

all counsel of record via electronic mail, CM/ECF, and via Certified Mail on the date set forth 

below.

Dated: 7/09/2020 /s/ Christopher B. Noyes

Christopher B. Noyes, Cal. State Bar 

No. 270094 (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

One of the Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case: 1:20-cv-04000 Document #: 2 Filed: 07/09/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:16
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4294 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4294

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the annex to the E. Barrett Prettyman Federal Building and 
 United States Courthouse located at 333 Constitution Avenue Northwest 
    in the District of Columbia as the `William B. Bryant Annex'''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4294

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the annex to the E. Barrett Prettyman Federal Building and 
 United States Courthouse located at 333 Constitution Avenue Northwest 
    in the District of Columbia as the `William B. Bryant Annex'''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The annex to the E. Barrett Prettyman Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse located at 333 Constitution Avenue Northwest in the 
District of Columbia shall be known and designated as the ``William B. 
Bryant Annex''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the annex referred to in section 1 shall 
be deemed to be a reference to the ``William B. Bryant Annex''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 21, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS AMENDED SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF OAKRIDGE ENERGY, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MAY
31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                         155,936
<SECURITIES>                                 1,358,009
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,300,958
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,008,629
<PP&E>                                      18,537,581
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,458,179
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,529,710
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          840,775
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       406,312
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,733,089
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,529,710
<SALES>                                        433,836
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               433,836
<CGS>                                          431,161
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  573,181
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,308,332
<INCOME-TAX>                                   437,885
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            870,447
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   870,447
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 31, 2021 s0324

Order 

Clerk

March 31, 2021

161627

ALBERT JOSEPH FRATARCANGELI,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 161627

COA: 347390

Oakland CC: 2018-166053-CZ

SARAH MYERS, MICHAEL SUMMERS,

JAMES BOWIE, OAKLAND COUNTY,

WILLIAM PERRY, DAVID WEAVER III,

BRANDON HALL, SAMUEL JAMES, 

PHILIP DUROCHER, and DANIELLE VEATCH,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 9, 2020 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court ha s determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-30672 Summary Calendar

__________________
Wallace Ray Ritter, Plaintiff-Appellee

versus Ricky Hawthorne; Roger Smith, Defendants, and The Village of Sun, Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Louisiana

(CA-94-2249-E)

______________________________________________

January 15, 1996
Before KING, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: *

The Village of Sun, Lou isiana, appeals from a denial of summary judgment. Sun contends that it is protected from suit by2

the Eleventh Amendment of the United States Constitution. We have reviewed the record and the district court's order and find no reversible error. Sun is a municipal corporation in Louisiana, is
not an "arm of the state," and is not entitled to the immunity afforded the State of Louisiana under the Eleventh Amendment. Accordingly, we affirm for essentially the reasons given by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Thomas G. Tachovsky, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of Entropin, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(b) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: May 12, 2005



|    |  |                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Thomas G. Tachovsky, Ph.D.       
|    |  | Thomas G. Tachovsky, Ph.D.           
|    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Entropin, Inc. and will be retained by Entropin, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.