alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUBROUTINE INVXWX(N,K)
C     PURPOSE--THIS SUBROUTINE COMPUTES THE INVERSE OF X'WX 
C     WHICH IS DONE BY COMPUTING THE INVERSE OF R'R (WHERE
C     R HAS JUST RECENTLY BEEN MODIFIED BEFORE CALLING THIS 
C     SUBROUTINE.  THE INPUT R = THE SQUARE ROOT OF
C     THE DIAGONAL MATRIX D TIMES THE OLD MATRIX R.
C     THE INVERSE OF X'WX WILL BE IDENTICAL
C     (EXCEPT FOR THE ABSENCE OF S**2 = THE RESIDUAL
C     VARIANCE) TO THE COVARIANCE MATRIX OF THE COEFFICIENTS.
C     THE ONLY REASON THIS SUBROUTINE EXISTS IS FOR THE
C     CALCULATION OF SUCH COVARIANCES.
C     UNPIVOTING HAS ALSO BEEN DONE HEREIN SO AS TO UNDO
C     THE PIVOTING DONE IN THE DECOMPOSITION SUBROUTINE (DECOMP).
C     THE MATRIX C USED HEREIN IS AN INTERMEDIATE RESULT MATRIX.
C     X--NOT USED
C     Q--NOT USED
C     R--USED AND CHANGED
C     D--NOT USED
C     IPIVOT--USED
C     INVERSION ALGORITHM USED--CHOLESKI DECOMPOSITION
C     UPDATED         --NOVEMBER  1975. 
C     UPDATED         --FEBRUARY  1976. 
C
C---------------------------------------------------------------------
C
      DIMENSION Q(10000),R(2500),D(50),IPIVOT(50) 
      COMMON /BLOCK2/ WS(15000)
      COMMON /BLOCK3/ DUM1(3000),DUM2(3000)
      EQUIVALENCE (Q(1),WS(1))
      EQUIVALENCE (R(1),WS(10001))
      EQUIVALENCE (D(1),WS(12501))
      EQUIVALENCE (IPIVOT(1),WS(12551)) 
      DIMENSION DUM3(200)
C
C-----START POINT-----------------------------------------------------
C
      DO 10 I=1,K
      IM1=I-1
      IF(IM1.LT.1)GOTO10
      DO15J=1,IM1
      IRARG=(I-1)*K+J
      R(IRARG)=0.0
15    CONTINUE
10    CONTINUE
      DO30JJ=1,K
      J=K+1-JJ
      DO 30 II=1,J
      I=J+1-II
      IP1=I+1
      IF(IP1.GT.K)GOTO25
      DO20L=IP1,K
      IRARG1=(I-1)*K+L
      IRARG2=(J-1)*K+L
      IRARG3=(L-1)*K+J
      DUM1(L)=R(IRARG1)
      IF(L.LT.J)DUM2(L)=R(IRARG2)
      IF(L.EQ.J)DUM2(L)=DUM3(L)
      IF(L.GT.J)DUM2(L)=R(IRARG3)
20    CONTINUE
25    RI=0.0
      IRARG=(I-1)*K+I
      IF (I.EQ.J) RI=1.0/R(IRARG)
      ANEGRI=-RI
C
      CALL DOT(DUM1,DUM2,IP1,K,ANEGRI,DOTPRO)
C
      IRARG=(I-1)*K+I
      DOTPRO=-DOTPRO/R(IRARG) 
      IF(I.EQ.J)DUM3(I)=DOTPRO
      IRARG=(J-1)*K+I
      IF(I.LT.J)R(IRARG)=DOTPRO
30    CONTINUE
      DO35I=1,K
      IRARG=(I-1)*K+I
      R(IRARG)=DUM3(I)
35    CONTINUE
C
C     MATRIX C NOW EQUALS THE INVERSE OF R'R.
C     NOW 'UNPIVOT' ON C AND PUT THE RESULTS BACK INTO R.
C
      DO40I=1,K
      II=IPIVOT(I)
      DO40J=1,I
      JJ=IPIVOT(J)
      IRARG1=(II-1)*K+JJ
      IRARG2=(I-1)*K+J
      IRARG3=(JJ-1)*K+II
      IF(II.LT.JJ)R(IRARG1)=R(IRARG2)
      IF(II.EQ.JJ)DUM3(II)=R(IRARG2)
      IF(II.GT.JJ)R(IRARG3)=R(IRARG2)
40    CONTINUE
      DO50I=1,K
      IRARG=(I-1)*K+I
      R(IRARG)=DUM3(I)
50    CONTINUE
      RETURN
      END
#### STATE v. JACKSON

No. 244PA97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 129

Motion by Attorney General for temporary stay allowed 27 May 1997.
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 14

- 00004

- CV

ICANUTE ENERGY, INC., AND JOHN A. UPTON, Appellant s

V.

RED RIVER ARK

- LA

- TEX DRILLING, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 5th District Court

Cass County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- C

- 474

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley2 

### M EM ORANDUM OPINION

The appellants, Icanute Energy, Inc., and John A. Upton, have filed a motion seeking to

dismiss this appeal. Pursuant to Rule 42.1(a)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the

motion is granted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

Accordingly, we dismis s this appeal.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: May 5, 2014

Date Decided: May 6, 2014
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN . . 

opinion x0. 0-1553 

33: G&ore acou8e en ound 

sale at tin or coQml88 on of 

ofiense ctld e in8 

4 

at tr 1, 

he is entitled to be 

ii;zistne oi t ‘2 ed 

w been ao~uittod up1ln4l Trooeclure, 

e criae end 

cllwefl oomis6ion of the crime 

tte trial and provides that the 

th certified to the county judge 

necessary step6 to have the dend confined in a state hos?ftal for 

.xozes 8me .* 

Article 5551a, Vorndn’s Texas Clril Statutes, protide6 ror lunacy prooeedincs rrguinst persons,. "Ilot charged 

dth a oritinal offent@. 

Cha?ter 2, Tltlc 51, ~orlsed Statutes, 36 ononded 

Oontaln nuaerou6 provisions trlth reference to state hospltais. 

While there are prorlelons to the effect that *‘a person alleeed to be lnsano, and Who is not held on a crinllnal oharge, 

.-- ______ ___,__.. __ --_- .__. em.“- 
Ron. Carl I-errlman, Page 2 

oajr be oonolttad to and oonflnrd in Ed lnatltutlon ior the 

606tod7 end treatment or the imane”, there dons not ap?eor 

to be ray speolflo prohibition a~olnst an insane person Vito 

16 ohaqed with the WWd66iOn of a crtne belpg t.re&ed. in 

one of the State hOSpit416. 

It is therefore the opinion of this depurtmmt 

that under the state of taots submitted in your letters the 

defeodant, air. Trl~ht,~ia entitled to be aooepted nnd treated 

in one of the State hospltkls Par the insane. Ye are inpelled to this view beOaU66 rrom a reading OS all the statutes 

we cannot arrive at the ooncluslon that it is the Log16latiw 

intent that all persons oharged with the 00I~1%S6iOn ai a 

orlme who have been adjudged as being of sound .z.lnd at the 

dste of the elleged ooiz&8sion but who hate subsequently become insane mu8t remin in the custody of tte siiwiff until 

they return to sanity. Certainly it ~48 hot thb intention Of 

the Legislature to so provide. ZHdontly the puqoso of those 

provisions in the Statutds is to avoid coaplalnte in lunacy 

bei= tiled a&dnet persons charged nlth orime for the purpose 

of delayiag trial md making the IState's case nore diiflcult. 

The purpose certainly oould not htve bee3 that tnoab insane 

persona, if they continue insane ;lust remin ln the custodp of 

the sheriff until death. 

'J /' 

A. s. i?ollins 

a8SiStClt
EXHIBIT 32(a)**CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) ofLindsay Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended November 30, 2007, I, RichardW. Parod, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, David B. Downing, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.       /s/ Richard W. Parod President and Chief Executive Officer    Richard W. Parod         /s/ David B. Downing Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    David B. Downing     January 8, 2008       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE v. ALEXANDER

No. 92P97

Case below: 125 N.C.App. 419

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 May 1997.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             12,910
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       6,832
<ALLOWANCES>                                           53
<INVENTORY>                                           585
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   20,526
<PP&E>                                            151,993
<DEPRECIATION>                                     78,158
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     94,708
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              12,205
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              488
<OTHER-SE>                                         49,503
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       94,708
<SALES>                                            23,392
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   24,499
<CGS>                                               7,839
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      17,351
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    893
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     7,148
<INCOME-TAX>                                        2,793
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 4,355
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                        4,355
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.89





</TABLE>
|       | (1)    |       | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”); and |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                |   |
|                                | (2)    |                                | The      information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the  Company.            |

| Dated:   March      31, 2010 | /S/ Frederick W.      Jones    |
|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                                   | Frederick W. Jones             |
|                                   | Acting Chief Financial Officer |
|                                   | (Principal Financial Officer)  |

----
Unassociated Document


    

      October
        26, 2005

      


      


      


      Friday
        Harbour, LLC

      1786
        S.
        Creek Drive

      Osprey,
        FL 34229

      


      Attn: Debra
        Duffey

      


      This
        letter is to confirm that in connection with the Facility Loan Agreement
        between
        you and Invisa, Inc., as amended June 21, 2005, the term over which Invisa,
        Inc.
        may borrow funds under the Agreement has been extended until August 31, 2006.
        The due date for repayment for loans under the Agreement has also been extended
        until August 31, 2006. All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain
        in
        full force and effect.

      


      


      


      by:
        ___________________________ by: ___________________________

      Stephen
        A. Michael    Debra
        Duffey

      Acting
        President
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha
Nutra, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Marc Urbach, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and will be retained by China
Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




August
      23, 2010
                      /s/ Marc UrbachMarc
      Urbach (Principal
      Accountng Officer and Principal Financial
  Officer)
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, Gregg D. Scheller, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Synergetics USA, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release34-47986];(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: June 13, 2006              /s/ Gregg D. Scheller   Gregg D. Scheller   President and Chief Executive Officer
MEP Advisory Board Meeting 

AGENDA

Wednesday, June 13, 2018

University of Texas, Arlington Campus/University Center Building

Rio Grande Ballroom B

Second Floor

300 W. First Street

Arlington, TX 76019

Wednesday, June 13, 2018

MEP Advisory Board Meeting

9:00 – 9:05 a.m. Meeting Logistics • Cheryl Gendron, NIST MEP 

9:05 – 10:05 a.m. Welcome and Introductions

• Opening Remarks

• Welcome to the Campus of UTA

• Welcome from NIST Leadership

• Board and Audience 

Introductions

• Director’s Update

• Bernadine Hawes, Vice Chair, MEP 

Advisory Board 

• Vistasp Karbhari, Ph.D., President, 

University of Texas Arlington

• Phil Singerman Ph.D., NIST Innovation 

and Industry Services

• Carroll Thomas, NIST MEP

10:05 – 10:15 a.m. Break

10:15 – 10:45 a.m. MEP National Network Strategic Plan 

Update 2017-2022/Future is Now (FIN)

Board Feedback & Discussion

• Carroll Thomas, NIST MEP

10:45 – 11:30 a.m. Interactive Working Session

• Spreading the Good Word – Best 

Practices for Powerful Advocacy 

• Carroll Thomas, NIST MEP

• Lisë Stewart, Eisner Amper

11:30 a.m. –

12:00 p.m.

Presentation: 

• Update from the Manufacturing 

U.S.A. Institutes 

• Frank Gayle, Sc.D., NIST Office of 

Advanced Manufacturing (OAM)

12:00 – 1:30 p.m. Lunch Break 

• Advance RSVP required

• Chemistry-Physics Building/Private 

Room

• Catering at approx. $15 per person

o Cash or Check Required

1:30 – 1:35 p.m. Welcome Back/Afternoon Overview • Jeff Wilcox, Chair, MEP Advisory Board 

1:35 – 2:20 p.m. Working Group Update:

• Supply Chain Development 

Working Group

Board Feedback & Discussion

• Matt Newman, MEP Advisory Board

• Dave Stieren, NIST MEP
MEP Advisory Board Meeting, continued

2:20 – 3:05 p.m. Working Group Update:

• Performance/Research 

Development Working Group

Board Feedback & Discussion

• Leslie Taito, MEP Advisory Board

• Ken Voytek, NIST MEP

3:05 – 3:20 p.m. Break

3:20 – 4:00 p.m. Working Group Update:

• Executive Committee Working 

Group

Board Feedback & Discussion

• Jeff Wilcox, Chair, MEP Advisory Board

• Bernadine Hawes, Vice-Chair, MEP 

Advisory Board

• Carroll Thomas, NIST MEP

4:00 – 4:30 p.m. Wrap-up/Public Comments • Jeff Wilcox, Chair, MEP Advisory Board 

• Carroll Thomas, NIST MEP

All times are subject to change. 

Meeting Open to the Public, Registration Complimentary but Required:

Anyone wishing to attend the MEP Advisory Board meeting must submit 

their name, company/organization, email address and phone number to 

Cheryl Gendron (Cheryl.Gendron@nist.gov or 301-975-2785) no later than 

Friday, June 8, 2018, 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

Rev. 6/7/2018
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 66

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on International

Relations in the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 13, 1997

Mr. GILMAN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Oversight

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on

International Relations in the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

3 For the expenses of the Committee on International

4 Relations (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the

5 ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries,

6 there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the

7 House of Representatives for committee salaries and ex8 penses, not more than $10,983,892 for the One Hundred

9 Fifth Congress.
2

•HRES 66 IH

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

2 Of the amount specified in section 1—

3 (1) not more than $5,349,555 shall be available

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

5 noon on January 3, 1997, and ending immediately

6 before noon on January 3, 1998; and

7 (2) not more than $5,634,337 shall be available

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

9 noon on January 3, 1998, and ending immediately

10 before noon on January 3, 1999.

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner

15 directed by the Committee on House Oversight.

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by

19 the Committee on House Oversight.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Keith Elliott BYRD, Defendant—Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ronita Michelle Jones, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-4267.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 25, 2004.

Decided: Dec. 6, 2004.

*860Daniel J. Clifton, John G. Plumides, Plumides Law Office, Charlotte, North Carolina; D. Baker McIntyre, III, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellants.

Gretchen C.F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Kimlani S. Murray, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Keith Elliott Byrd and Ronita Michelle Jones appeal from their convictions and sentences for conspiracy to distribute cocaine and cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846 (2000), and importation of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960 (2000). Finding no error, we affirm.

Byrd and Jones each challenge, as their sole claim on appeal, the district court’s interrogation of witnesses at trial. A district court’s participation in the interrogation of a witness pursuant to Fed. R.Evid. 614 is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. *United States v. Parodi,*703 F.2d 768 (4th Cir.1983). Assuming that this claim was preserved by Appellants, we find no abuse of discretion. A district court may call witnesses, interrogate them, or cross-examine them. Fed.R,Evid. 614(a), (b). Indeed, the court has an obligation to do so “for the ascertainment of the truth” or to “avoid needless consumption of time.” Fed.R.Evid. 611(a). The district court became involved in the interrogation of the witnesses at issue only after the witnesses’ evasive answers and a series of frivolous objections by defense counsel had halted the progress of the proceedings. Under these circumstances we find no error.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgments of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel are you 

a Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this &ourt an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this &ourt’s

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 8.6.&§1746, this

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

Alhummza Stokes v. City of

Chicago, et. al

1:20-cv-04716

Kallatt Mohammed

Sean M. Sullivan

Daley Mohan Groble

55 W Monroe, Suite 1600

Chicago, IL 60603

6191677 312-422-0315

ssullivan@daleymohan.com

08/27/2020

✔

✔

✔

✔

Sean M. Sullivan

Case: 1:20-cv-04716 Document #: 22 Filed: 08/27/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:58