Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 230 / Monday, December 1, 2014 / Notices 71087 

5See 19 CFR 351.212(b). 

6See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 

(February 14, 2012); 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

7 Lightweight Thermal Paper from Germany: 

Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value, 73 FR 57326, 57328 (October 2, 2008). 

1See Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and 

Tube Products From Turkey: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012– 

2013, 79 FR 35999 (June 25, 2014) (Preliminary 

Results), and the accompanying Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum (PDM). 

time, and location of the hearing two 

days before the scheduled date. 

The Department intends to issue the 

final results of this administrative 

review, including the results of its 

analysis of issues raised in any written 

briefs, not later than 120 days after the 

date of publication of this notice, 

pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results, the 

Department shall determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review.5

If Koehler’s weighted-average 

dumping margin is above de minimis 

(i.e., 0.50 percent) in the final results of 

this review, we will calculate an 

importer-specific per-unit duty 

assessment rate by aggregating the total 

amount of antidumping duties 

calculated for the examined sales and 

dividing this amount by the total 

quantity of those sales, because Koehler 

did not report entered value for all its 

U.S. sales. To determine whether this 

duty assessment rate is de minimis, in 

accordance with the requirement set 

forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will 

calculate an importer-specific ad 

valorem ratio based on the estimated 

entered value. 

We will instruct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review when the 

importer-specific assessment rate 

calculated in the final results of this 

review is above de minimis. Where 

either Koehler’s weighted-average 

dumping margin is zero or de minimis, 

or the importer-specific assessment rate 

is zero or de minimis, we will instruct 

CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties.6

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003. This clarification will 

apply to entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by Koehler for 

which it did not know its merchandise 

was destined for the United States. In 

such instances, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction. For a full discussion of 

this clarification, see Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

We intend to issue instructions to 

CBP 15 days after the publication date 

of the final results of this review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for Koehler will be 

the rate established in the final results 

of this review, except if the rate is less 

than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de 

minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash 

deposit rate will be zero; (2) for 

previously reviewed or investigated 

companies not participating in this 

review, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recent period; (3) 

if the exporter is not a firm covered in 

this review, a prior review, or the 

original investigation, but the 

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recent period for the manufacturer of 

the merchandise; and (4) the cash 

deposit rate for all other manufacturers 

or exporters will continue to be 6.50 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the less-than-fair-value 

investigation.7 These requirements, 

when imposed, shall remain in effect 

until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 

the reimbursement of antidumping 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: November 21, 2104. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

1. Scope of the Order 

2. Fair Value Comparisons 

A. Determination of Comparison Method 

B. Results of the Differential Pricing 

Analysis 

3. Product Comparisons 

4. Export Price and Constructed Export Price 

5. Normal Value 

A. Home Market Viability and Selection of 

Comparison Market 

B. Level of Trade 

C. Cost of Production Analysis 

D. Calculation of Normal Value Based on 

Comparison-Market Prices 

6. Currency Conversion 

7. Duty Absorption 

[FR Doc. 2014–28260 Filed 11–28–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–489–501] 

Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe 

and Tube Products From Turkey: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On June 25, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the preliminary 

results of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on welded 

carbon steel standard pipe and tube 

products (welded pipe and tube) from 

Turkey.1 The period of review (POR) is 

May 1, 2012, through April 30, 2013. 

Based on our analysis of the comments 

received, we have made no changes in 

the margin calculations. Therefore, the 

final results do not differ from the 

Preliminary Results. The final weightedaverage dumping margins for the 

reviewed firms are listed below in the 

section entitled ‘‘Final Results of the 

Review.’’ Further, unchanged from the 

Preliminary Results, we continue to find 

that various companies had no 

shipments of subject merchandise 

during the POR. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 1, 2014. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
71088 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 230 / Monday, December 1, 2014 / Notices 

2See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 36000. 

3As explained in the Preliminary Results, the 

Department treats Borusan, Borusan Istikbal Ticaret 

T.A.S., and Borusan Lojistik Dagitim Depolama 

Tasimacilik ve Tic A.S. as the same legal entity. See 

79 FR at 35999 and n.3. 

4See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 35999 and the 

accompanying PDM at 3–4. 

5See, e.g., Magnesium Metal From the Russian 

Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923 

(May 13, 2010) (Magnesium Metal), unchanged in 

Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010). 

6See the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 7See footnote 3. 8As explained in the Preliminary Results, the 

Department treats Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi 

A.S. and Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S. as the same legal 

entity. See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 35999 & 

n.3. However, the Department no longer includes 

Toscelik Metal Ticaret A.S. as part of this entity 

because it ceased to exist prior to the POR. Id. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Victoria Cho, Fred Baker, or Robert 

James, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, 

Enforcement and Compliance 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC, 20230; telephone (202) 

482–5075, (202) 482–2924, or (202) 482– 

0649, respectively. 

Background 

On June 25, 2014, the Department 

published the Preliminary Results, and 

invited interested parties to comment.2

On July 30, 2014, we received case 

briefs from the petitioner, Wheatland 

Tube Company (Wheatland), and one 

respondent, Borusan Mannesmann Boru 

Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (Borusan).3 On 

August 6, 2013, we received rebuttal 

briefs from Wheatland and Borusan. 

The Department has conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is welded pipe and tube. The welded 

pipe and tube subject to the order is 

currently classifiable under subheading 

7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5025, 

7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, 

7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, and 

7306.30.5090 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). 

The HTSUS subheadings are provided 

for convenience and customs purposes. 

The written description is dispositive. 

A full written description of the scope 

of the order is contained in the 

memorandum from Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of 

the Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review: Welded Carbon Steel Standard 

Pipe and Tube Products from Turkey; 

2012–2013’’ (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum), which is hereby 

adopted by this notice and incorporated 

herein by reference. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov, and it is available to 

all parties in the Central Records Unit, 

Room 7046 of the main Department of 

Commerce building. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/. The signed Issues and Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Final Determination of No Shipments 

In the Preliminary Results, the 

Department preliminarily determined 

the following companies had no 

shipments during the POR: the Borusan 

Group, Borusan Holding A.S., Cayirova 

Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., ERBOSAN 

Erciyas Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., 

Guven Celik Boru San. ve Tic. Ltd., 

Guven Steel Pipe, Metaleks Celik 

Urunleri San. ve Tic. Ltd. Sti., Metaliks 

Celik Urunkeri San. ve Tic. Ltd., 

Toscelik Metal Ticaret A.S., Toscelik 

Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S., Umran 

Celik Boru Sanayii A.S., Umran Steel 

Pipe Inc., Yucel Boru ve Profil 

Endustrisi A.S, Yucelboru Ihracat Ithalat 

ve Pazarlama A.S., and Yucel Group.4

Following publication of the 

Preliminary Results, we received no 

comments from interested parties 

regarding these companies. As a 

consequence, and because the record 

contains no evidence to the contrary, we 

continue to find that none of these 

companies made shipments during the 

POR. Accordingly, consistent with the 

Department’s practice, we intend to 

instruct U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) to liquidate any 

existing entries of merchandise 

produced by these companies, but 

exported by other parties, at the allothers rate.5

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case briefs by 

parties are addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. A list of the 

issues which parties raised and to 

which we respond in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is attached to 

this notice as an Appendix. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

our analysis of the comments received 

from interested parties on the 

Preliminary Results, we have made no 

changes to the margin calculations.6

Final Results of the Review 

As a result of this review, we 

determine that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the 

period May 1, 2012, through April 30, 

2013: 

Manufacturer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Borusan Mannesmann Boru 

Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.7 1.28 

Toscelik Profil ve Sac 

Endustrisi A.S.8 0.00 

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed within five days of the date 

of publication of this notice to parties in 

this proceeding in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

The Department shall determine, and 

CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on 

all appropriate entries covered by this 

review pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b). The 

Department intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

date of publication of these final results 

of review in the Federal Register. 

For Borusan, because its weightedaverage dumping margin is not zero or 

de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), 

the Department has calculated importerspecific antidumping duty assessment 

rates. We calculated importer-specific 

ad valorem antidumping duty 

assessment rates by aggregating the total 

amount of dumping calculated for the 

examined sales of each importer and 

dividing each of these amounts by the 

total entered value associated with those 

sales. We will instruct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review where an 

importer-specific assessment rate is not 

zero or de minimis. Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate without regard to antidumping 

duties any entries for which the 

importer-specific assessment rate is zero 

or de minimis. 

For Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi 

A.S. (Toscelik), we will instruct CBP to 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 230 / Monday, December 1, 2014 / Notices 71089 

9See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8103 

(February 14, 2012). 

10See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). 

11See Antidumping Duty Order; Welded Carbon 

Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products From 

Turkey, 51 FR 17784, 17784 (May 15, 1986) (Order). 

12See Assessment Policy Notice for a full 

discussion of this clarification. 

13See Magnesium Metal, 75 FR at 26923; 

Assessment Policy Notice, 68 FR 23954; see also 

Order, 51 FR at 17784. 14See Order, 51 FR at 17784. 

liquidate its entries during the POR 

imported by the importer identified in 

its questionnaire responses without 

regard to antidumping duties because its 

weighted-average dumping margin in 

these final results is zero.9

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003.10 This clarification applies 

to entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR produced by companies 

included in these final results of review 

for which the reviewed companies did 

not know that the merchandise they 

sold to an intermediary (e.g., a reseller, 

trading company, or exporter) was 

destined for the United States. In such 

instances, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate established in the less-thanfair-value (LTFV) investigation 11 if 

there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction.12

For the companies identified above as 

having had no shipments, because the 

Department has determined that each of 

these companies had no shipments 

during the POR for which they had 

knowledge, all entries entered under 

each of their cash deposit rates will be 

liquidated at the all-others rate 

established in the LTFV investigation.13

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rates for Borusan and 

Toscelik will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margins established in 

the final results of this review; (2) for 

previously reviewed or investigated 

companies not participating in this 

review, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

established from a completed segment 

of this proceeding for the most recent 

period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm 

covered in this review, a previous 

review, or the original LTFV 

investigation, but the manufacturer is, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established from a completed segment 

of this proceeding for the most recent 

period for the manufacturer of the 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 14.74 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the LTFV investigation.14 These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this review period. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in the Secretary’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred, and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notifications to Interested Parties 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.305(a)(3), this notice serves as the 

only reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO. Timely written 

notification of return or destruction of 

APO materials, or conversion to judicial 

protective order, is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

These final results of review and 

notice are published in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: November 21, 2014. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

Summary 

Background 

Scope of the Order 

Discussion of the Issues 

Issue 1: Physical Characteristic for Grade 

Issue 2: Whether the Department Should 

Collapse ASTM A53 grade A and ASTM 

A53 grade B into a Single Grade Category 

Issue 3: Duty Drawback and Treatment of 

the Resource Utilization Support Fund 

Tax 

Issue 4: Duty Drawback and Yield Loss 

Factor 

Issue 5: Differential Pricing 

Issue 6: Withdrawal of the Regulatory 

Provisions Governing Targeted Dumping 

in Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations 

Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2014–28263 Filed 11–28–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–964] 

Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and 

Tube From the People’s Republic of 

China: Preliminary Results and Partial 

Rescission of Administrative Review; 

2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In response to requests from 

interested parties, the Department of 

Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’) is 

conducting the third administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on seamless refined copper pipe and 

tube from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’), covering the period 

November 1, 2012 through October 31, 

2013. The Department preliminarily 

determines that, during the period of 

review, Golden Dragon Precise Copper 

Tube Group, Inc., Hong Kong GD 

Trading Co., Ltd., and Golden Dragon 

Holding (Hong Kong) International, Ltd. 

(collectively, ‘‘Golden Dragon’’), the 

respondent in this proceeding, has made 

sales of subject merchandise at less than 

normal value (‘‘NV’’). Interested parties 

are invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 1, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

James Martinelli, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–2923. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Scope of Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is seamless refined copper pipe and 

tube. The product is currently classified 

under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) item 

numbers 7411.10.1030 and 

7411.10.1090. Products subject to this 

order may also enter under HTSUS item 

numbers 7407.10.1500, 7419.99.5050, 

8415.90.8065, and 8415.90.8085. 

Although the HTSUS numbers are 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES