alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 490 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                 House Calendar No. 217
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 490

                          [Report No. 105-602]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
    bill (H.R. 2676) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 
  restructure and reform the Internal Revenue Service, and for other 
                               purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 1998

    Mr. Dreier, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
    bill (H.R. 2676) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 
  restructure and reform the Internal Revenue Service, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
2676) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restructure and 
reform the Internal Revenue Service, and for other purposes. All points 
of order against the conference report and against its consideration 
are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.
                                     





                                                 House Calendar No. 217

105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 490

                          [Report No. 105-602]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
    bill (H.R. 2676) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 
  restructure and reform the Internal Revenue Service, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 24, 1998

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-13-00157-CV

____________________

IN THE INTEREST OF R.T.W.

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the 317th District Court 

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-186,023-A 

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

The appellant filed a notice of appeal from temporary orders in a suit affecting the

parent-child relationship. We questioned our jurisdiction and invited the parties to file 

responses. No response has been filed. We also warned the appellant that the filing fee 

must be paid unless she established indigence. The appellant neither asserted indigence 

nor paid the filing fee.

Generally, an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment. Lehmann v. 

Har–Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Generally, temporary orders in 

suits affecting the parent-child relationship “are not subject to interlocutory 
2

appeal.” Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 105.001 (West 2008). The appellant has not 

shown that a statute authorizes an appeal at this time. Furthermore, the appellant 

did not file a response within the schedule set by the Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3. We dismiss the appeal. Id.

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

 ________________________________

 HOLLIS HORTON

 Justice

 

Opinion Delivered May 16, 2013

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Order entered August 2, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00240-CV

TIFFANY POLLARD, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE 

MARIE MERKEL CHILDREN’S TRUST, Appellant

V.

RUPERT M. POLLARD, Appellee

On Appeal from the 95th District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-12515

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s July 31, 2019 amended motion requesting an extension of 

time to August 23, 2019 to file his brief on the merits. By order dated July 26, 2019, the Court 

granted appellee’s prior motion and extended the deadline to August 23, 2019. Accordingly, we 

DENY appellee’s amended motion as moot.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4179 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4179

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide a presumption of 
 service connection for certain specified diseases and disabilities in 
the case of veterans who were exposed during military service to carbon 
                             tetrachloride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 2004

  Mr. Peterson of Minnesota introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide a presumption of 
 service connection for certain specified diseases and disabilities in 
the case of veterans who were exposed during military service to carbon 
                             tetrachloride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Carbon Tetrachloride 
Benefits Act''.

SEC. 2. PRESUMPTIONS OF SERVICE CONNECTION WITH RESPECT TO EXPOSURE TO 
              CARBON TETRACHLORIDE.

    Section 1112 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d)(1) For the purposes of section 1110 of this title, and 
subject to the provisions of section 1113 of this title, in the case of 
a veteran who served for ninety days or more in active military, naval, 
or air service and who while in such service was exposed to carbon 
tetrachloride, any disease or disability specified in paragraph (2) 
becoming manifest in such veteran shall be considered to have been 
incurred in or aggravated by such service, notwithstanding that there 
is no record of evidence of such disease during the period of such 
service.
    ``(2) Diseases and disabilities referred to in paragraph (1) are 
the following:
            ``(A) Depleted vision or floater cataracts.
            ``(B) Hearing impairments such as high-pitch ringing, 
        sensitivity to loud noises, and loss of hearing.
            ``(C) Memory losses such as lapses of recall, dates, 
        numbers, and inverting numbers and letters.
            ``(D) Growths.
            ``(E) Swelling of hands or feet.
            ``(F) Aching bones or joints throughout the body (not 
        associated with arthritis).
            ``(G) Loss of hair.
            ``(H) Deterioration of nervous system.
            ``(I) Pulmonary edema.
            ``(J) Hemorrhagic congestion.''.
                                 <all>
```
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JACOB MATHLEY

Case No. 20 CR 585

 

Hon. Rebecca R. Pallmeyer

Chief Judge

ORDER

Upon the Government’s Unopposed Motion, under Title 18, United States 

Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), for an extension of time in which to seek the return of an 

indictment or to file an information in this case in the above-captioned case, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time within which to file an indictment or 

information against defendant Jacob Mathley be extended to and including 

November 2, 2020.

Specifically, this Court finds that the ends of justice served by the extension 

outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial for the 

reasons stated in the government’s sealed attachment.

ENTERED:

 

________________________________

REBECCA R. PALLMEYER

Chief Judge

DATED: September 16, 2020

Case: 1:20-cr-00585 Document #: 13 Filed: 09/16/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:40
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Kiran Patel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the amendment to Quarterly Report of Solectron Corporation on Form 10-Q/A for
the three-month period ended November 26, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Solectron Corporation. Date: April 14, 2005 /S/     Kiran PatelKiran PatelExecutive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4248 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 7, 2004 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the 

authorization of appropriations for the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to make grants to existing comprehensive 

service programs for homeless veterans, and for other 

purposes. 
2 

HR 4248 RDS 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Homeless Veterans As5 sistance Act of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIA7 TIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005. 

8 Section 2013 of title 38, United States Code, is 

9 amended by striking ‘‘$75,000,000’’ in paragraph (4) and 

10 inserting ‘‘$99,000,000’’. 

11 SEC. 3. PERMANENT AUTHORITY FOR SECRETARY OF VET12 ERANS AFFAIRS TO OPERATE SEXUAL TRAU13 MA COUNSELING PROGRAM. 

14 Section 1720D(a) of title 38, United States Code, is 

15 amended— 

16 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘During the 

17 period through December 31, 2004, the’’ and insert18 ing ‘‘The’’; and 

19 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘, during the 

20 period through December 31, 2004,’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 7 (legislative day, October 6), 2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
MAYTAG CORPORATION

                                   Exhibit 23

                        Consent of Independent Auditors.

                                    <PAGE>


                         Consent of Independent Auditors





Shareowners and Board of Directors
Maytag Corporation

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Number
33-8249, Registration Statement Number 33-8248, Registration Statement Number
33-6378, Registration Statement Number 33-22228, and Registration Statement
Number 33-26620 on Forms S-8; and Registration Statement Number 33-35219 on Form
S-3 of Maytag Corporation and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated
January 28, 1997 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Maytag Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 1996.






                                                  s/sErnst & Young LLP





Chicago, Illinois
March 26, 1997<PAGE>
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
   
     We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to
the use of our reports dated (i) February 10, 1997 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Commodore Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries,
(ii) February 3, 1997 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Southern Star Communications, Inc., formerly known as Osborn Communications
Corporation, and (iii) March 5, 1998, except for Notes 2 and 14 as to which the
date is April 27, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
SFX Broadcasting Inc. and Subsidiaries, all included in Amendment No. 5 to the
Registration Statement (Form S-1, No. 333-48819) and related Prospectus of
Capstar Broadcasting Corporation for the registration of shares of its common
stock.
    
 
                                            ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
New York, New York
   
May 22, 1998
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-08-28T14:44:27Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-08-28T14:44:33Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-08-28T14:44:33Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="77622">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="2">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-08-28T14:44:27Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>OFFICEOFTHEA'ITORNEY CsENERALOFTEXAS 
AU8TlN </p>
<p></p>
</div>
<div class="page"><p></p>
<p>558 </p>
<p></p>
<div class="ocr">298

Honorable Joe ©. Gladney, pace 2

tution, nor are such two offices inoospatible. %e answer
your first question in the negative, maxing it unnecessary

to notice your ascond one. ‘ie enclose coplen of our opinions
Hoe. 0-3308 and 0-3522 from whish the reasons for our holding
4m Feaponse to your question appear in wore detail.

Yours wery truly
ATTOURSY GENTRAL OF PEXAS

S ERAS By C4..k Bu

' Glenn R. Lewis
Aselatant

PPROVED JUL L

</div>

</div>
</body></html>
#### Jackson Bradburn *v.*Chas. W. Warnock, etc.

Appeal — Review.

The Court of Appeals can. not review matters not raised by the issues and not adjudged by the trial court.

APPEAL FROM: CARTER CIRCUIT COURT.

January 14, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

The judgment appealed from was rendered on 'the 25th of August, 1871, and is that in which certain matters between C. W. *318Warnock, J. Bradburn, Ro-bt. Shaw and John Holbrook are litigated, involving the right of Warnock to be reimbursed the amount paid by him- to extinguish the lien of Garbell, and how the same shall be paid, or apportioned -out of or on the notes given by said War-nock to Gent for the price of the land purchased of him-, and by Gent assigned to Bradburn, Holbrook and Shore.

*R. D. Davis, for appellaM.*

*Dulin, for appellees.*

By the judgment of the court below, Warnock was credited on the note held by Bradburn $143.14, the full amount thereof, he having reduced that note to that sum by payment; and the balance of $164.06, to- make up the whole amount to satisfy the Gartrell lien, was credited on the note held by Holbrook, and further adjudged that Holbrook by the pleadings was not entitled to a judgment against Warnock for the balance of the note he held on Warnock, and that the case was not in a state of preparation to- try as between him and Shore, and as to- those matters and all others not settled, and in litigation, the case was continued on the cross-claims of Holbrook, and that appropriate pleadings should be filed to enable the court to- dispose of the whole cause, and Bradburn has appealed.

Of the four notes executed by appellant first, and unpaid, the one held by appellant first matured, and if at the time Warnock paid the money to remove the lien, Gent, to whom it was given, had then been the holder, there can be no doubt that he would have been entitled to have the credit therefor on the note, or notes, first maturing, and he lost none of his equities by the assignment of said notes to others, consequently the court did not err in adjudging his credits to be placed on the notes held by Bradburn and Holbrook. And as there is no judgment adjusting the rights as between the several assignees of Gent, on that branch of the case, there is nothing for this court to review. But it may not be improper to suggest that, if it is intended by all the holders of the four notes to- have the equities adjusted as between them, it would be proper for the parties to- amend the pleadings to- raise these issues.

But the final judgment between Bradburn and Warnock as to the right of the latter to his credits is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,908,397
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,140,166
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 63,281,785
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            91,467,477
<PP&E>                                      44,282,617
<DEPRECIATION>                              21,046,447
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             129,923,989
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       32,777,512
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,871,530
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,019,435
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               129,923,989
<SALES>                                    140,604,885
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           140,604,885
<CGS>                                      115,863,228
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              115,863,223
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,982,325
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,336,938
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,155,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,181,938
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .90


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01
 
    CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS, DATED JUNE 26, 1998
 
     We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the
Registration Statement and related Prospectus of Crescent Operating, Inc. dated
June 26, 1998 for the registration of common stock, preferred stock and common
stock warrants and to the incorporation by reference therein of our reports
dated March 2, 1998, with respect to the combined financial statements of
Carter-Crowley Asset Group and March 27, 1998 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Crescent Operating, Inc. both of which are included in
its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
                                            ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Dallas, Texas
June 26, 1998
#### John C. Buckner *v.*Geo. W. Edwards.

Bills and Notes — Consideration.

A benefit to one party and some prejudice, to the other is sufiicient consideration to sustain a note.

Trusts — Note Executed to Executors — Bankruptcy.

A note executed to persons1 as executors is held in trust for the estate, and does not pass into the hand® of the assignee in bankruptcy, on application by the executor for the benefit of the bankrupt law.

APPEAL. FROM GREEN 'CIRCUIT COURT.

December 15, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

Appellee alleged in his original petition that his co-obligee had transferred the benefit of the note to him; that he was'the sole owner thereof, and made the *co-obligee*a defendant, who was *113served with process, and failed to answer; consequently the first paragraph ■ controverting the ownership of appellee to the note sued on, presented no defepse.

*Rush, for appellant.*

*Chelf, for appellee.*

There was no evidence to sustain the second paragraph charging fraud.

After appellee and Wm. S. Buckner had been removed as executors, appellant entered into the compromise arrangement with them, having full knowledge of all the facts, promised to pay the amount agreed upon and had the agreement executed on the part of appellee and Wm. S. Buckner, and the suit against appellant for a much larger amount than the note sued on dismissed; whereby benefit resulted to him and some prejudice to them which formed a valid consideration for the note.

The note as evidence of a debt against appellant dated the 12th of February, 1856, was executed to Edwards & Buckner as executors, and the same when they applied for and got the benefit of the bankrupt law was held in trust for the benefit of the estate of their testator, and did. not pass to their assignees in bankruptcy, and the note sued on was^ executed two years after their discharge. Every fact relied on in the answer as material was known to appellant before he executed the note sued on, and it seemed important to him' to,have the suit dismissed which was pending against him when the note in question was executed and that he accomplished and having procured the contract to be executed on the part of Edwards and Crawford so far as it benefited him, it is not graceful in him to endeavor to evade the execution on his part.

Judgment *aMrmed.*
Exhibit 10.1
 
 Agreement August 1, 2010 Michael R. Fanning Executive Synergetics USA, Inc. Company
  Board
     Standard Compensation Due




---



##### 



Cause 2 provided however
 Change in Control
   2




---



##### 



Code
 Disability Disabled
 Exchange Act
 Involuntary Termination Status
Changes
 Person
 Term Term
 3




---



##### 



Termination of Employment
    4




---



##### 



No Mitigation
    Excess Parachute Payments
   5




---



##### 



Funding
 Assignment
 Notices
 To the Company:
    
    Synergetics USA, Inc.3845 Corporate Centre DriveOFallon, Missouri 63368Attn:Chairman of the BoardTo Executive:
    
    Michael Fanning28221 LaughlinWest Lake, OH 44145
  Provisions Severable
 Entire Agreement
 Not an Employment Agreement
 6




---



##### 



Amendments and Modifications
 Governing Law
   SYNERGETICS USA, INC.By:
    /s/ Robert H. DickName:
    Robert H. DickTitle:
    Chairman of the Board of DirectorsEXECUTIVE/s/ Michael R. FanningName:
    Michael R. Fanning 7