alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          134684
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    83889
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  304501
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            30816
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      273685
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    304501
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 15685
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 19342
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3657)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3657)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3657)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.49)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 67210]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26818]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, 
November 13, 2014 at 2:00 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has 
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Aguilar, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution settlement of administrative proceedings;
Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the 
Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: November 6, 2014.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-26818 Filed 11-7-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

 

Mechanical Technology Incorporated

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Mechanical Technology Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Cynthia A. Scheuer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), that, to my knowledge:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TANDY
BRANDS ACCESSORIES, INC.'S MARCH 31, 1997 FORM 10-Q (RESTATED AS REQUIRED BY
REGULATION S-K ITEM 601(c)(2)(iii).) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FILINGS. DOLLARS ARE IN THOUSANDS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             383
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,152
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,214
<INVENTORY>                                     33,831
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,100
<PP&E>                                          10,101
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,007
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,079
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,056
<BONDS>                                         16,850
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,470
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,451
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    69,079
<SALES>                                         77,462
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                77,462
<CGS>                                           48,706
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,706
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,304
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 954
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,602
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,094
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,508
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,508
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .64
        

</TABLE>
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January

23 , 2020

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 18

- 00651

- CV

DATA MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS CORPORATIONS , Appellant

V.

UPSTREAM ENERGY SERVICES, LP , Appellee

On Appeal from the 268th Dis trict Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 09

- DCV

- 172561

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an appeal from a judgment signed May 4, 201 8 . On January 16, 2020, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The

motion is granted. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Bourliot.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel are you 

a Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this &ourt an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this &ourt’s

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 8.6.&§1746, this

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

Alhummza Stokes v. City of

Chicago, et al.

20-cv-4716

Kallatt Mohammed

Tyler E. Roland

Daley Mohan Groble

55 W Monroe, Suite 1600

Chicago, IL 60954

6287217 312-422-5533

troland@daleymohan.com

5/14/2021

✔

✔

✔

✔

Tyler E. Roland

Case: 1:20-cv-04716 Document #: 29 Filed: 05/14/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:75
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-21-00289-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

235th District Court of Cooke County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV20-00209

Before Womack, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE S.B AND D.B. INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT KIN FOR D.B. AND G.B.,

MINORS, Relators
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of the 

opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: September 17, 2021
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Edward K. Aldag, Jr., certify that:



|1) | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3) | Based on my knowledge, the other financial information included in this report is fairly presented in all material respects as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                                
|------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2012 |  | /s/ Edward K. Aldag, Jr.                       
|                   |  | Edward K. Aldag, Jr.                           
|                   |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
IoTAB - AI Research - September 2023 

“AI Risk Management Framework.” NIST, July 2021. www.nist.gov, 

https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework. 

“Artificial Intelligence.” NIST, June 2017. www.nist.gov, https://www.nist.gov/artificialintelligence. 

Artificial Intelligence 2023 Legislation. https://www.ncsl.org/technology-andcommunication/artificial-intelligence-2023-legislation. Accessed 18 Sept. 2023. 

“Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights | OSTP.” The White House, 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/ai-bill-of-rights/. Accessed 18 Sept. 2023. 

“California Bill Proposes Regulating AI at State Level.” Time, 13 Sept. 2023, 

https://time.com/6313588/california-ai-regulation-bill/. 

House, The White. “FACT SHEET: Biden-Harris Administration Announces New Actions to 

Promote Responsible AI Innovation That Protects Americans’ Rights and Safety.” The 

White House, 4 May 2023, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statementsreleases/2023/05/04/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-announces-new-actions-topromote-responsible-ai-innovation-that-protects-americans-rights-and-safety/. 

“The National Artificial Intelligence Initiative (NAII).” National Artificial Intelligence Initiative, 

https://www.ai.gov/. Accessed 18 Sept. 2023. 

“The State of State AI Laws: 2023.” EPIC - Electronic Privacy Information Center, 

https://epic.org/the-state-of-state-ai-laws-2023/. Accessed 18 Sept. 2023.
TGDC Meeting, July 2011

VVSG 1.1Reliability

David Flater, Ph.D.

Computer Scientist, Software and Systems Division, ITL

http://vote.nist.gov

*

TGDC Meeting, July 2011

Page *

Previous Public Review Draft
        - The reliability benchmarks were made more stringent and traceable to a use case provided by former TGDC member Paul Miller working with other election officials
        - The test method was changed from a standalone Probability Ratio Sequential Test to classical hypothesis testing using all available data:
        - A demonstration of non-conformity can easily occur
        - Conclusive results are never guaranteed and are impossible without at least X volume of testing.  The plan was to give a pass to any system that did not demonstrate non-conformity

TGDC Meeting, July 2011

Page *

Response from EAC
        - To pass without demonstrating conformity is unacceptable
        - Testing long enough to demonstrate conformity is not doable and would be of limited validity anyway.  (Reliability can't be tested in; it must be built in)
        - Move to best practices for quality assurance, reliability engineering and analysis
        - Volume and stress testing is a validation of that work, not a demonstration of reliability in and of itself
        - Specific methods of reliability analysis should not be prescribed

TGDC Meeting, July 2011

Page *

Impact on VVSG 1.1
        - The reliability benchmarks will be expressed in terms of the probabilities of critical and non-critical failures
        - Manufacturers will be required to deliver credible reliability analyses for their systems (e.g., FMEA).  The specific methods to be used will not be prescribed
        - Hypothesis testing will still be used for accuracy and misfeed rate, but demonstration of conformity will be required
        - Incidentally, the maintainability and availability sections will go away

TGDC Meeting, July 2011

Page *

Limitations
        - In a reliability analysis, the probability of a software (logic) failure "cannot be determined;"* at best it can be extrapolated from the observed rate of failure or fault correction using a statistical model
        - The previous reliability tests were strictly hardware-oriented, so this is actually an improvement
        - Conformity assessment will require the "expert judgment" of a reliability engineer

* Clifton A. Ericson II, Hazard Analysis Techniques for System Safety, 2005, Table 13.1 (Hardware/Software FMEA Characteristics)

TGDC Meeting, July 2011

Discussion/Questions

Page *
EXHIBIT 10.129







SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT





As of March 13, 2006, the following are the base salaries (on an annual basis) of certain named executive officers (as defined in Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K) of Mechanical Technology Incorporated whose compensation was either not previously disclosed or has changed from the employment agreement previously filed as an Exhibit:

|Steven N. Fischer                                      | $  180,000
|------------------------------------------------------ | ----------
|Chairman, Mechanical Technology Incorporated           |           
|Cynthia A. Scheuer                                     | $  200,000
|Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, |           
|Mechanical Technology Incorporated                     |           
|                                                       |           

The Company does not have a written employment agreement with Steven N. Fischer, its Chief Executive Officer, however it does have an arrangement with him where he is paid an annual salary of $180,000 and he will receive 100% of his base salary and benefits for six months if he is terminated without cause. This arrangement continues unless modified or terminated.

The Company will provide additional information regarding compensation awarded to all Named Executive officers in respect of and during the year ended December 31, 2005, in the Proxy Statement for the Company's 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of year end.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Peer Review Meeting.                    

*Date:*                         December 16, 2014.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Room 4F100, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Vasundhara Varthakavi, DVM, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, DEA/NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD, 301-496-2550,                         *varthakaviv@niaid.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

 Dated: November 21, 2014.

David Clary,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2014-28074 Filed 11-26-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
----

| (1) | The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |                                  |                      |
|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|---------------------------|
|                                | STUDIO ONE MEDIA, INC.                |
|                                |                                  |                      |
| Date:   November 19, 2013 | By:                         | /s/  Preston J. Shea |
|                                | Preston J. Shea                       |
|                                | President and Chief Executive Officer |

|                                     |                                                 |                         |
|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                                     | STUDIO ONE MEDIA, INC.                               |
|                                     |                                                 |                         |
| Date:   November 19, 2013 | By:                                        | /s/  Joseph A Desiderio |
|                                     | Mirella Chavez                                       |
|                                     | Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer |
Chapter 5 

Buildings

Presenter: Robert Pekelnicky, PE, SE

Degenkolb Engineers
Reliability vs. 

Resiliency

Safe ≠ Usable

Photo courtesy of Degenkolb Engineers

Photo courtesy of AECOM
Example Performance Matrix

TEXT
Building Performance Levels

A – Safe & 

Operational

B – Safe & Usable 

During Repair 

C – Safe & Not 

Usable

D – Unsafe

Photos courtesy of Degenkolb 

Engineers

Photo courtesy of AECOM
Interdependencies

• Power and water critical

• Most buildings need 

people to make them 

functional (i.e. the 

workers) – they must be 

able to get to the 

building

• Adjacent buildings can 

pose hazards

Photos courtesy of Degenkolb Engineers
New Buildings

• Current standards do not 

explicitly deal with function 

protection for every hazard

• Code architectural, 

structural, mechanical 

requirements are sometimes 

not in alignment

• New building standards are 

easier to change than 

existing building 

requirements

Photos courtesy of Degenkolb Engineers
Existing Buildings

• Codes, standards, 

and building practice 

constantly evolving

• Structural Standards 

are typically not 

retroactive

• Retrofit often costly 

and disruptive

Photos courtesy of Degenkolb Engineers
Strategies

• Local communities can 

tailor to their hazards 

and resilience desires

• Provide power and 

water self-sufficiency 

• Prioritize what buildings 

are critical

• Balance mandatory, 

triggered, and voluntary 

upgrades

Photo courtesy of Degenkolb Engineers
Breakout Discussion Topics

• What are your experiences with building 

vulnerabilities that affect resilience?

• Are there elements within the building sector 

that have been overlooked in the framework?

• How can interdependences between critical 

buildings and other infrastructure be 

addressed?

• Can the recommendations in this chapter be 

implemented? If not, what changes are 

needed?