alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| November 6, 2009 |   | By: /s/ | David A. Wheat                                                                                         |
|------------------|--------|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (Date)           |   |    | David A. Wheat

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

  |

 

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hawker Pacific Aerospace (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Richard A. Fortner and James R. Bennett, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, each
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





|/s/ Richard A. Fortner                                                     |  | /s/ James R. Bennett                                      
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|Richard A. Fortner
        Chief Executive Officer
        August 13, 2002 |  | James R. Bennett
 Chief Financial Officer
 August 13, 2002
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture
 AGENCY: National Institute of Food and Agriculture, USDA.
 ACTION: Notice; correction.
 SUMMARY: The National Institute of Food and Agriculture published a document in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         on November 6, 2014 concerning a request to establish a new information collection for letter of intent. The document did not contain the burden hours.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Martin, 
                        *rmartin@nifa.usda.gov* Correction In the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         on November 6, 2014, in FR Doc. 014-26404, on page 65925, add the following: Estimated Annual Burden
Title
Form No.
Respondents
Number of 
                                 responses per  
                                 respondent
Total annual 
                                 responses
Hours per 
                                 response
Total hoursLetter of Intent Form (LOI) (Individual)
N/A
4,858
1
4,858
2
9,716Assurance Statement (State)
NIFA-2008
2,000
1
2,000
0.5
1,000Fellowship/Scholarships Entry/Exit Form (State)
NIFA-2010
150
1
150
3
450.0Supplemental Information Form (State)
N/A
5,500
1
5,500
2
11,000( print page 70500)Supplemental Information Form (Individual)
N/A
50
1
50
2
100.0Supplemental Information Form (Private)
N/A
600
1
600
2
1200.0Supplemental Information Form (Federal)
N/A
50
1
50
2
100.0Proposal Type Form (State)
N/A
2,050
1
2,050
0.25
512.5Proposal Type Form (Private)
N/A
50
1
50
0.25
12.5Proposal Type Form (Federal)
N/A
50
1
50
0.25
12.5Application Modification Form
N/A
0
1
0
0.08
0.0Total





24,388
 Dated: November 20, 2014. Robert Holland, Associate Director for Operations, National Institute of Food and Agriculture.


[FR Doc. 2014-28025 Filed 11-25-14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410-22-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period from June 27, 2008 (commencement of operations) to March 31, 2009 of MacroShares $100 Oil Up Trust (the "Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), I, John A. Flanagan, principal financial officer of Macro Securities Depositor, LLC, which acts as the depositor for the Registrant (the "Depositor"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Annual Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.

Date: June 29, 2009

| |  |                                                                               
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ JOHN A. FLANAGAN                                                          
| |  | John A. Flanagan
Chief Financial Officer of Depositor,
on behalf of registrant
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4114 

To amend the Migratory Bird Treaty Act to exclude non-native migratory 

bird species from the application of that Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 1, 2004 

Mr. GILCHREST (for himself, Mr. SAXTON, and Mr. KIND) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Migratory Bird Treaty Act to exclude nonnative migratory bird species from the application of 

that Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Migratory Bird Treaty 

5 Reform Act of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF NON-NATIVE SPECIES FROM APPLI7 CATION OF CERTAIN PROHIBITIONS UNDER 

8 MIGRATORY BIRD TREATY ACT. 

9 Section 2 of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 

10 U.S.C. 703) is amended— 
2 

•HR 4114 IH 

1 (1) in the first sentence by striking ‘‘That un2 less and except as permitted’’ and inserting the fol3 lowing: ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Unless and except as 

4 permitted’’; and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(b) LIMITATION ON APPLICATION TO INTRODUCED

7 SPECIES.— 

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—This section applies only to 

9 migratory bird species that are native to the United 

10 States and whose occurrence in the United States is 

11 entirely the result of natural biological or ecological 

12 conditions. 

13 ‘‘(2) TREATMENT OF INTRODUCED SPECIES.— 

14 For purposes of paragraph (1)— 

15 ‘‘(A) a bird species shall not be treated as 

16 native to the United States if it occurs in the 

17 United States solely as a result of intentional or 

18 unintentional human-assisted introduction; and 

19 ‘‘(B) a migratory bird species shall be 

20 treated as native to the United States if— 

21 ‘‘(i) it was native to the United States 

22 and extant in 1918; 

23 ‘‘(ii) it was extirpated after 1918 

24 throughout its range in the United States; 

25 and 
3 

•HR 4114 IH 

1 ‘‘(iii) after such extirpation, it was re2 introduced in the United States as a part 

3 of a program carried out by a Federal 

4 agency.’’. 

Æ
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| November 12, 2008 | By: /s/ | David A. Wheat                                                                                         |
|------------------------|--------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (Date)                 |         | David A. Wheat

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

  |
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT

COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT

OF LLINOIS DALLAS DIVISION

United States of America )

) No. 20-cr-577-3

v. ) Hon. Elaine Bucklo

)

Johnnie GRANT )

AGREED MOTION TO CONTINUE CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING FOR 60

DAYS

NOW COMES the defendant, Johnnie GRANT, by and through his attorney, Michael J. 

Petro, and hereby requests this Honorable Court to grant this AGREED MOTION TO 

CONTINUE CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING FOR 60 DAYS. In support of this motion,

GRANT states as follows:

1. GRANT is currently pending a Change of Plea Hearing on 03/17/2023.

2. Plea negotiations have NOT been finalized between the parties. 

3. Plea negotiations have been fruitful. But, more work needs to be done. 

4. The parties agree that time should be excluded until the next court date to continue 

plea discussion and in the interests of justice.

5. AUSA Prashant Kolluri agrees with this Motion. 

WHEREFORE, the GRANT prays that this court grant this AGREED MOTION TO 

CONTINUE CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING FOR 60 DAYS

By His Attorney, 

s/Michael J. Petro

Attorney for Johnnie GRANT

110 North 11th Street, Suite 202

Tampa, Florida 33602 

attorney@mjpetro.com

312-913-1111

Case: 1:20-cr-00577 Document #: 584 Filed: 03/13/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:1909
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, MICHAEL J. PETRO, an attorney, state that I caused to be filed, by electronic 

filing (ECF), with the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of 

Illinois, the foregoing document on Tuesday, June 07, 2022.

By His Attorney, 

s/Michael J. Petro

Attorney for Johnnie GRANT

110 North 11th Street, Suite 202

Tampa, Florida 33602 

attorney@mjpetro.com

312-913-1111

Case: 1:20-cr-00577 Document #: 584 Filed: 03/13/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:1910
#### STATE v. WILLIS

No. 236P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 223

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 23 July 1997. Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 23 July 1997.
----

----

----

| Section      6.23 | Counterparts.      This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in two or more counterparts      each of which shall be deemed an original, and it shall not be necessary      in making proof of this Indenture to produce or account for more than one      such counterpart. |
|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| By: |                                                                                                                         /s/      Brett R. Kaplan |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         352,019
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   89,930
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    104,508
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               625,286
<PP&E>                                         188,057
<DEPRECIATION>                                  81,007
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 732,336
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          311,953
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       127,205
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,544,293
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   732,336
<SALES>                                        563,875
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               563,875
<CGS>                                          207,684
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  775,830
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (4,839)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (414,800)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (414,800)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (414,800)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (number 333-20043) of United Dental Care, Inc. of our
report dated February 23, 1998, except for Note 12, as to which the date is
March 11, 1998, appearing on page F-2 of this Form 10-K.


PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 26,1998
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 28, 2010

y0525 

# Order

May 28, 2010

140991

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140991 COA: 296567 Wayne CC: 09-015581 CK DETROIT INTERNATIONAL BRIDGE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant,

and

SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of May 5, 2010, this Court granted immediat e consideration and a stay of trial court proceedings. On or der of the Court, the applica tion for leave to appeal the March 17, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presente d should be reviewed by this Court. The stay of trial court proceedings is DISSOLVED.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-03-166-CV

MARC CHAMBERS AND WAYNE PIPKIN	APPELLANTS

	V.

TRANS-TRADE, INC., BRUCE GALBRAITH, 				APPELLEES

LINDA GALBRAITH, TRANS-TRADE, INC. 

MONEY PURCHASE PENSION PLAN AND 

TRUST, AND TRANS-TRADE, INC. PROFIT

SHARING PLAN AND TRUST	

	----------

	FROM THE 153RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

We have considered “Appellants' Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM	

PANEL D:	MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.

		         DELIVERED: November 24, 2004
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4198 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Bis (2,2,6,6,-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl) 

sebaceate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2004 

Mr. BONNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Bis (2,2,6,6,- 

tetramethyl-4-piperidyl) sebaceate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON BIS (2,2,6,6,- 

4 TETRAMETHYL-4-PIPERIDYL) SEBACEATE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following: 

‘‘ 9902.34.21 Bis (2,2,6,6,-tetramethyl-4- 

piperidyl) sebaceate (CAS 

No. 52829–07–9) (provided 

for in subheading 

2933.39.20) ......................... Free No Change No Change On or Before 

12/31/2007 ’’. 
2 

•HR 4198 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
H. R. 3884

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 615

East Houston Street in San Antonio, Texas, as the ‘‘Hipolito F. Garcia Federal

Building and United States Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The Federal building and United States courthouse located

at 615 East Houston Street in San Antonio, Texas, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Hipolito F. Garcia Federal Building and

United States Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the Federal building and

United States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

to be a reference to the ‘‘Hipolito F. Garcia Federal Building and

United States Courthouse’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

mniteb ~tate5 (!Court of ~peaI5

for tbe jfeberaI (!Circuit

UNITED STATES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF

NEW YORK (ALSO KNOWN AS AMERICAN

NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY),

Defendant-Cross Appellant,

AND

WASHINGTON INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

2012-1462, -1473

Appeals from the United States Court of International

Trade in case no. 09-CV-0187, Senior Judge Richard W.

Goldberg.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Case: 12-1462 Document: 29 Page: 1 Filed: 10/05/2012
us V. GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE CO. 2

Defendant-Cross Appellant Great American and Defendant-Appellee Washington International jointly move

for a 22-day extension of time, until November 27, 2012,

to file their opening briefs.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

OCT 052012

Date

cc: Amy Rubin, Esq.

T. Randolph Ferguson, Esq.

Mark D. Plevin, Esq.

s27

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

Case: 12-1462 Document: 29 Page: 2 Filed: 10/05/2012
#### Fred Hawkins *v.*C. W. Parker, etc.

Cancellation of Instruments — Mortgage—Title—Pleading.

Where plaintiffs sued to 'cancel a mortgage executed by them, and defendant answered resisting the right to have the mortgage canceled, an allegation that he acquired title to the property, and if not he is willing to take a good title thereto, the chancellor is not compelled to go in search of a title for defendant, nor are the plaintiffs required to make an exhibit of the title they have when not called upon to do so.

Appeal — When Appellant Not Entitled to Relief.

Where the record shows that appellant obtained everything he asked for in the court below, he is entitled to no relief as he has nothing to complain of. ‘

APPEAL, FROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT.

April 9, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

Parker and wife in the original petition filed in this case were seeking a cancellation of the mortgage executed by them to Margaret W'ilson upon the ground of fraud. A final judgment was rendered in September, 1868, dismissing their petition, and this terminates all claim they ever could have asserted against Hawkins for the property as it is now too late for them to prosecute an appeal from that judgment. The appellant, Hawkins, by his answer filed to the petition of Parker and wife, resists their right to have the mortgage canceled and claims that under his purchase from Mrs. Wilson he acquired a title to the property, and if not says that he is willing to take a good title and asks the chancellor to perfect it. No rescission of the contract is asked for by him, and no defect of title pointed out in any way. Parker, as the evidence shows, authorized Whaley to sell the notes he had obtained for his property and had, in fact, received from' Whaley a part of the'purchase money, but whether he did or not is immaterial, as he. is not complaining and could not if h‘e desired. As has already been suggested it is now too late for him to prosecute an appeal.

The chancellor, in accordance with the prayer of the cross-petition of appellant, has given him all he asked for. He had accepted the deed with a general warranty from Mrs. Wilson, and in order *638to perfect the title all the chancellor could do was to require Parker and wife, or a commissioner for them, to execute a deed to the appellant.

*Harlan, Nesoman, for appellant.*

*Speed & Buckner, for appellees.*

The chancellor was not compelled to go in search of a title for the appellant, nor were the appellees required to make an exhibit of what title they had, as they were not called upon by the' appellant to do so. The suggestion in the brief of counsel that it appears in some other case that there is some defect in the title is nowhere to be found in the record, and if such a defect exists it results only that appellant had ample opportunity afforded him in the present case to make the question and has failed to present it.

This record presents a case where the party appealing has obtained everything he asked for in the court below and in such case the party is entitled to no relief, as he has nothing to complain of. The judgment is *affirmed. Todd v. McClanahan’s Heirs,*1 J. J. Marshall 355.
Exhibit 2

UNREDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT

PROPOSED TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 697-11 Filed: 02/09/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:17917