alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James Dudley et al. *v.*William Wilson's Admr.

Fraudulent Conveyance — Preference of Creditor — Statute of 1856 — Limitation.

In order to invoke the aid of the statute of 1856, suit must be instituted within six months after the fraudulent preference has been made.

APPEAL FROM ’FLEMING CIRCUIT COURT.

September 19, 1872.

*W. H. Cord, for appellants.*

*Anderson, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge .Hardin :

The transfer of the note on Sanders to Jonathan Wilson was not, in our opinion, so designed and intended as to operate as a general assignment for the benefit of Smith’s creditors under the act. of 1856. Nor did the circumstances prove, as badges of fraud, in relation to the attachment suit of William Wilson against Smith establish a joint purpose or agreement between those parties, to effect a lien on the property merely in order that Wilson should give preference over other creditors of Smith, in contemplation of the insolvency of Smith. But if the. evidence was such as to give the transaction that effect, as more than six months elapsed between the levy of the attachment and the institution of this suit, the remedy sought was barred by the limitation provisions of the act of 1856.

Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 70514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27948]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP15-163-000.
    Applicants: Cimarron River Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Negotiated Rates 
2014-06-19 to be effective 12/10/2014.
    Filed Date: 11/10/14.
    Accession Number: 20141110-5115.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-164-000.
    Applicants: Venice Gathering System, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: Compliance Filing 
111014 to be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 11/10/14.
    Accession Number: 20141110-5250.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-165-000.
    Applicants: Ozark Gas Transmission, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Negotiated Rate 
Entergy K820175 to be effective 1/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 11/12/14.
    Accession Number: 20141112-5012.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-166-000.
    Applicants: Gas Transmission Northwest LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.403(d)(2): Annual Fuel 
Filing 2014 to be effective 1/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 11/12/14.
    Accession Number: 20141112-5099.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/24/14.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: November 12, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-27948 Filed 11-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      OF PERIODIC REPORT**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Alpha Nutra,
      Inc.(the “Company”), certifies that:




1.  The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September
      30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







September
      20, 2006








By:
            /s/Mark
                L. Baum
              Mark
                L. Baum
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer





This
      certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
      to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
      purpose.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board

The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from RSI Logistics (WB604-12—11/12/14) for permission to use certain data from the Board's 2013 Carload Waybill Sample. A copy of this request may be obtained from the Office of Economics.

The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.

*Contact:*                     Alexander Dusenberry, (202) 245-0319.                

Jeffrey Herzig,

Clearance Clerk.

[FR Doc. 2014-28038 Filed 11-25-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel are you 

a Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this &ourt an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this &ourt’s

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 8.6.&§1746, this

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

In Re: TIKTOK, Inc., a

Consumer Privacy Litigation

20-cv-04699

Cherise Slate(on behalf of minor P.S.) and Brenda Washington(on behalf of minor M.W.)

Kristofer S. Riddle

Clifford Law Offices, P.C.

120 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 3100

Chicago, IL 60602

6306828 312-899-9090

smm@cliffordlaw.com

August 27, 2020

✔

✔

✔

✔

Kristofer S. Riddle

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 14 Filed: 08/27/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:229
EXHIBIT 1

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 664-1 Filed: 08/01/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:16703
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.1

Eastern Division

Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., et

al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.:

1:20−cv−05905

Honorable Steven C.

Seeger

The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations

Identified on Schedule A, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, July 31, 2023:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiffs' motion for

return of the bond (Dckt. No. [193]) is hereby denied as premature. This Court previously

issued a TRO and a preliminary injunction, but later vacated the preliminary injunction for

lack of notice (Dckt. No. [105]). Meanwhile, the case is still pending on the merits.

Defendant might seek damages someday based on the notion that it was "wrongfully

enjoined or restrained," as provided in Rule 65(c). That possibility is enough to justify the

continuation of the bond. Plaintiffs obtained injunctive relief, and posted a bond as a

security in case the bond was improper. And that issue remains unresolved, so the bond

needs to remain in place. Mailed notice. (jjr, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 664-1 Filed: 08/01/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:16704 Case: 1:20-cv-05905 Document #: 198 Filed: 07/31/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:4987
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          90,770
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  407,169
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    380,379
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               948,414
<PP&E>                                         452,292
<DEPRECIATION>                                 355,922
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,052,450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          392,195
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,180
<OTHER-SE>                                     606,075
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,052,450
<SALES>                                      2,216,978
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,216,978
<CGS>                                        1,299,326
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,012,230
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,189
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (95,633)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (95,633)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (95,633)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.025)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.025)


</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00279-CV

In re Faron Ray Truelove

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop

Filed: May 27, 2010
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4298

To improve the efficiency of the Department of Energy’s Energy Employees 

Occupational Illness Compensation Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2004

Mr. WAMP (for himself, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. DAVIS of Tennessee, and Mr. JENKINS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the 

Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To improve the efficiency of the Department of Energy’s 

Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation 

Program, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. IMPROVEMENTS TO ENERGY EMPLOYEES OC4 CUPATIONAL ILLNESS COMPENSATION PRO5 GRAM. 

6 (a) STATE AGREEMENTS.—Section 3661 of the En7 ergy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Pro8 gram Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 7385o) is amended—
2

•HR 4298 IH 

1 (1) in subsection (b) by striking ‘‘Pursuant to 

2 agreements under subsection (a), the’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘The’’; 

4 (2) in subsection (c) by striking ‘‘provided in an 

5 agreement under subsection (a), and if’’; and 

6 (3) in subsection (e) by striking ‘‘If provided in 

7 an agreement under subsection (a)’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘If a panel reports a determination under subsection 

9 (d)(5)’’. 

10 (b) SELECTION OF PANEL MEMBERS.—Section 3661 

11 of that Act (42 U.S.C. 7385o) is further amended in sub12 section (d) by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows: 

13 ‘‘(2) The Secretary of Health and Human Serv14 ices shall select individuals to serve as panel mem15 bers based on experience and competency in diag16 nosing occupational illnesses. For each individual so 

17 selected, the Secretary shall appoint that individual 

18 as a panel member or obtain by contract the services 

19 of that individual as a panel member.’’.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

HORBERG ENTERPRISES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND HOWARD TODD

HORBERG

v.

USA RECYCLING INDUSTRIES, INC., F/K/A VOYAGER PETROLEUM, INC.,

AND VINCENT SMITH

PETITION OF: VINCENT SMITH :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 198 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of September, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### G. M. Mulligan *v.*G. W. Harris, etc.

Insolvency — Debtor’s Property in Possession of Creditor — Right to.

Although, as a general rule, a creditor who has property of an insolvent debtor in his possession will not be compelled to pay for it until his debt is satisfied, yet the creditor may, by his conduct, preclude himself from the benefit of such rule.

*429APPEAL FROM ALLEN CIROUIT COURT.

February 5, 1853.

*Lewis, Leslie, for appellant.*

*Gatewoods, Craddock, for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

While as a general rule it is true that a creditor who has the effects of an insolvent debtor in his hands will not be compelled to part with them until his debt is satisfied; yet in this case appellant, by his disavowal in his answer to Brown’s cross-suit against him,etc., and by his acquiescence in the appropriation of the funds, has precluded himself from the benefit of the rule.

By the terms in which appellant accepted appellees’ notice of the transfer of the residue of the debt on Brown he certainly waived his lien by failing then to apprise Harris of his claim, and place him in a condition to seek indemnity from. Murry, his assignor.

The judgment must therefore be *affirmed.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

CAMELBAK PRODUCTS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”,

Defendants.

Civil Action No.: 1:20-cv-03952

Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey T. Gilbert

SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, a judgment was entered in the above action on September 30, 2020 [41] in 

favor of Plaintiffs and against the Defendants Identified in Amended Schedule A. Plaintiffs

acknowledge payment of an agreed upon damages amount, costs, and interest and desires to release 

this judgment and hereby fully and completely satisfy the same as to the following Defendants:

NO. DEFENDANT

416 Shenzhen Jyc Technology Ltd. (beauty Care Branch)

142 Fine777

281 youngmallstore

THEREFORE, full and complete satisfaction of said judgment as to above identified 

Defendants is hereby acknowledged, and the Clerk of the Court is hereby authorized and directed 

to make an entry of the full and complete satisfaction on the docket of said judgment.

Case: 1:20-cv-03952 Document #: 51 Filed: 11/02/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:9424
DA TED: October 30, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 

Yanling Jiang (Bar No. 6309336) 

JiangIP LLC 

111 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 1700

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Telephone: 312-675-6297

Email: yanling@jiangip.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Subscribed and sworn before me by Yanling Jiang, on this 30th of October, 2020.

Given under by hand and notarial seal. 

MICHAEL SEVERT 

Official Seal 

1 Notary Public • State of Illinois 

, My Commis sion Expires Sep 11, 2023 

Notary Public 

State of :tl ---------

County of 

Case: 1:20-cv-03952 Document #: 51 Filed: 11/02/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:9425
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5


<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                            0
<SECURITIES>                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                     49,629
<ALLOWANCES>                      0
<INVENTORY>                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  49,629
<PP&E>                            394,639
<DEPRECIATION>                    (165,228)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    1,460,010
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             1,305,851
<BONDS>                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0
<PREFERRED>                       0
<COMMON>                          162,403
<OTHER-SE>                        29,429
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      1,460,010
<SALES>                           399,619
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  399,619
<CGS>                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     1,141,711
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                239,212
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (981,213)
<INCOME-TAX>                      1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (982,813)
<DISCONTINUED>                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0
<CHANGES>                         0
<NET-INCOME>                      (982,813)
<EPS-BASIC>                       (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                     (0.06)



</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DEVORIS NEWSON,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 23

- 0025 9

- CR

Appeal from the

120th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2 0110D01149 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Because there is no appealable order, we dismiss the appeal for

want of j urisdiction.

Appellate court jurisdiction is authorized by statute. See Galitz v. State , 617 S.W.2d 949,

951 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981) (en banc)

. In the absence of an authorizing statute, appellate courts

are without jurisdiction to consider an appeal. In the criminal context, the Texas Legislature has

authorized appeals from final, written judgments and certain specific interlocutory orders. See

Gutierrez v. State , 307 S.W. 3d 318, 321 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010) . Appellant’s pro se notice of

appeal does not specify the order he is attempting to appeal, and the docketing certificate from the

120th Judicial District Court does not indicate that there is an appealable order in this case.On September 26, 2023, the clerk of this Court sent Appellant a letter notifying him that it

appeared there was no appealable order at issue in this case. The letter gave notice of our intent to

dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction, after ten days, unless grounds were shown f or the Court

to continue the appeal. As of the date of this order, no response to the Court’s letter has been

received. Because there does not appear to be an appealable order, we dismiss th e appeal for want

of jurisdiction.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

October 1 6 , 2023

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                           JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                         499
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   13
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 0
<PP&E>                                                          56
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  56
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            0
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     686
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   717
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                67
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   32
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 35
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             35
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    35
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 3.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0
        

</TABLE>