alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Grafton Med. Company *v.*J. R. Wilson.

Appeal — Findings of Court.

The finding of the court in an ordinary action submitted to the court without a jury is entitled to the same consideration as the verdict of a jury.

APPEAL FROM McCRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT.

February 26, 1873.

*519
      *Quigley, for appellant.*

*James, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

This was an ordinary action submitted by the parties to the court without the intervention of a jury. The judgment is entitled to the same consideration as the finding of a jury. The testimony as to the power of the agent Hazel to bind the appellant by his contracts for expenses for board, etc., is conflicting, but the judgment of the court is not palpably against the weight of the evidence. It must therefore be *affirmed.*
H. R. 4012

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To amend the District of Columbia College Access Act of 1999 to reauthorize

for 2 additional years the public school and private school tuition assistance

programs established under the Act.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 5-YEAR REAUTHORIZATION OF TUITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS.

(a) PUBLIC SCHOOL PROGRAM.—Section 3(i) of the District of

Columbia College Access Act of 1999 (sec. 38—2702(i), D.C. Official

Code) is amended by striking ‘‘each of the five succeeding fiscal

years’’ and inserting ‘‘each of the 7 succeeding fiscal years’’.

(b) PRIVATE SCHOOL PROGRAM.—Section 5(f) of such Act (sec.

38—2704(f), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking ‘‘each of

the five succeeding fiscal years’’ and inserting ‘‘each of the 7 succeeding fiscal years’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 70206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27786]



[[Page 70206]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-85,512; TA-W-85,512A]


ALSIP Acquisition LLC, D.B.A. Future Mark ALSIP, ALSIP, Illinois; 
Futuremark Paper Company Westport, Connecticut; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on September 19, 2014, applicable to workers of Alsip Acquisition LLC, 
d.b.a. FutureMark Alsip, Alsip, Illinois (TA-W-85,512). The 
Department's Notice of Determination was published in the Federal 
Register on October 14, 2014 (79 FR 61658).
    At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm.
    The firm is engaged in the production of coated printing paper. 
Workers at FutureMark Paper Company, Westport, Connecticut supplied 
sales services.
    The investigation confirmed that worker separations at FutureMark 
Paper Company, Westport, Connecticut (TA-W-85,512A) are attributable to 
increased imports of coated printing paper, as are the worker 
separations at the Alsip Acquisition LLC, d.b.a. FutureMark Alsip, 
Alsip, Illinois (TA-W-85,512). The worker group includes individuals 
who worked from their homes in New Jersey but reported to the Westport, 
Connecticut office.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-85,512 and TA-W-85,512A is 
hereby issued as follows:

All workers of Alsip Acquisition LLC, d.b.a. FutureMark Alsip, 
Alsip, Illinois (TA-W-85,512) and FutureMark Paper Company, 
Westport, Connecticut (TA-W-85,512A) who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after August 28, 2013 through 
September 19, 2016, and all workers in the group threatened with 
total or partial separation from employment on the date of 
certification through September 19, 2016, are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act 
of 1974, as amended.


    Signed in Washington, DC, this 16th day of October, 2014.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014-27786 Filed 11-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
OTOWMNT Hae tA LS ae

* “ORUNES

Immersive Vistalization Environment
for Qiantitative, Interacive Material) Measinement

Stan Uptates:
On hau danens

Siep Oniside) Your,
ComionkZoneand
TH HKiGhosseDrsciplie
EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION TO BE
PROVIDED WITH FORM 10-K

Re:	Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. Trust 2004-HE3 (the "Trust"), Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-HE3, issued pursuant to the Pooling
and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2004 (the "Pooling and Servicing
Agreement"), among Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc., as depositor (the
"Depositor"), Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation, as a servicer, ("Chase"),
HomEq Servicing Corporation, as a servicer ("HomEq" and together with Chase,
 the "Servicers"), Aames Capital Corporation, as a responsible party,
Accredited Home Lenders, Inc., as a responsible party, NC Capital Corporation,
as a responsible party and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee
(the "Trustee")

 I, [identify the certifying individual], certify that:

            (1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K (the "Annual
Report"), and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution reports
(collectively with this Annual Report, the "Reports") filed in respect
of periods included in the year covered by this Annual Report, of the Trust;

            (2) Based on my knowledge, the information in the Reports, taken
as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this Annual Report;

            (3) Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing
information required to be provided to the Trustee by each Servicer under the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement, for inclusion in the Reports is included in
the Reports;

            (4) Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in this Annual Report and required to be delivered to the Trustee in
accordance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, and except as
disclosed in the Reports, each Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

            (5) The Reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to
the applicable Servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based
upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting
a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, that is included in the Reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  the Trustee and the
Servicers.

Date:	________________________________

[Signature]
[Title]
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10456 Conference Calendar

__________________ KENNETH LEE COLEMAN, SR., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus MICHAEL JONES, TDCJ Health Service Admin.; HENRY NORRID, Dr., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:94CV00120

- - - - - - - - - - August 23, 1995 Before KING, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Kenneth Lee Coleman, Sr., contends that prison medical personnel were deliberately indifferent to his serious needs because he did not receive tennis shoes with built-in arch supports. A prison official acts with deliberate indifference under the Eighth Amendment "only if he knows that inmates face a substantial risk of serious harm and [he] disregards that risk by failing to take reasonable measures to abate it." Farmer v. Brennan , 114 S. Ct. 1970, 1984 (1994); see Reeves v. Collins , 27No.95-10456 -2- F.3d 174, 176-77 (5th Cir. 1994) (applying the Farmer standard in the context of a denial-of-medical-care claim). Negligence, neglect, and even medical malpractice do not state a claim under § 1983. Varnado v. Lynaugh , 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). Testimony at the evidentiary hearing conducted pursuant to Spears v. McCotter , 766 F.2d 179, 180 (5th Cir. 1985), indicates that Coleman was prescribed tennis shoes with arch supports by Dr. Grabado following Coleman's testicular surgery. Eventually the shoes wore out, at which time Dr. Norrid prescribed tennis shoes and/or deck shoes. Dr. Revell testified at the Spears hearing that Coleman accepted a pair of deck shoes on July 22, 1993. Dr. Revell also testified that Coleman was seen numerous times and prescribed size 91⁄2, soft sole, canvas deck shoes. Dr. Revell further testified that Coleman was seen a number of times by Dr. Norrid regarding various complaints concerning the deck shoes. Coleman testified at the Spears hearing that on May 25, 1995, he refused to accept the shoes ordered by the medical staff because they did not have built-in arch supports. The record is devoid of any evidence pointing toward deliberate indifference and indicates nothing more than a disagreement with the medical treatment received. See Varnado , 920 F.2d at 321. This appeal presents no issue of arguable merit and is thus frivolous. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. APPEAL DISMISSED.
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Inmarsat Finance plc (the “Company”)for the annual period ended December 31, 2005 (the “Periodic Report”), I, Rick Medlock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Date: April 28, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS INCLUDED IN FCG'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
THERETO.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      18,333,000
<SECURITIES>                                19,475,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               45,907,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,545,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 16,733,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           103,673,000
<PP&E>                                      28,344,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,611,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             141,825,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       28,854,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 107,650,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               141,825,000
<SALES>                                    119,783,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           119,783,000
<CGS>                                       72,113,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               37,039,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (3,897,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (1,202,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,730,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,106,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         10,624,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,624,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44


</TABLE>
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 4.21    
    


Ministry of the Russian Federation for Communications and Informatization  


Supplement No. 5

to license No. 5607 (record series A 002365)

of January 10, 1997  


        The following paragraph shall be added to s. 1 of the "Conditions of activity under license No. 5607": 



        "Within
the scope of this license the licensee may provide cellular radiotelephone communications services of a dual-band (dual-range) network of the
GSM-900/1800 standard with the installation of necessary equipment operating at the frequency ratings allocated in the established manner in the 1800 and 900 MHz bands in the licensed
territory." 



	First Deputy Minister of the

Russian Federation for

Communications and Informatization	 	[signature]	 	Yu. A. Pavlenko
	
 	
 	

 	
 	

December 10, 2001
	
Head of the Administration for

Organization of Licensing	
 	
[signature]	
 	
N.M. Popov





[Seal:
Ministry of the Russian Federation for Communications and Informatization] 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.21
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7181** 
HANNIBAL TYR KONR BUCHANAN, a/k/a Paul Gregory Chapman , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Liam O ’ Grady , District Judge. ( 1:15

- cv - 00710

- LO

- TCB )

Submitted : December 15, 2015 Decided: December 18, 2015

Before GREGORY and FLOYD , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Hannibal Tyr Konr Buchanan , Appellant Pro Se
. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Hannibal Tyr Konr Buchanan appeals fro m the district court’s order dismissing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion, after construing it as an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Buchanan v. Virginia , No. 1:15

- cv - 00710

- LO

TCB (E.D. Va. filed July 9, 2015 & entered July 10, 2015)
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSE D
Exhibit 10.43

CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS HAVE BEEN OMITTED BASED UPON A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 24b-2 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND
HAVE BEEN SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

EXCLUSIVE CONSIGNMENT AND MARKETING AGREEMENT

BETWEEN MAUI PINEAPPLE COMPANY, LTD. AND CALAVO GROWERS, INC.

This Consignment and Marketing Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into in the County of Ventura in the
State of California, United States, by and between CALAVO GROWERS, INC., a corporation of the State of California ("Calavo"), and MAUI PINEAPPLE
COMPANY, LTD., a corporation of the State of Hawaii ("MPC").

Whereas, Calavo and MPC each desire to enter into a sourcing/marketing agreement for Maui Gold Pineapples ("Product") to the mainland
United States and other designated markets; and

Whereas, pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions hereafter provided, MPC desires to supply Calavo with Product on a
consignment basis (title of the Product will not pass to Calavo) for sale in the mainland United States and other markets as may be designated by Calavo.

Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt and
sufficiency of which are acknowledged by the parties, Calavo and MPC agree as follows:

---





2

---





---

3

---





Beneficiary Name:

Maui Pineapple Company, Ltd.Beneficiary Account:Bank Number:Bank Name:

Bank of HawaiiBank Address:

Honolulu, HI


4

---





Calavo:

Lee CalavoMPC:

Earl Teshima and Gerry Watts




5

---



If to Calavo:
Attention:
Lee ColeFax:Telephone:Address:
Calavo Growers, Inc.
1141 A Cummings Road
Santa Paula, CA 93060If to MPC:
Attention:
Earl TeshimaTelephone:Gerry WattsTelephone:Fax:Address:
Maui Pineapple Company, Ltd.
PO Box 187
Kahului, HI 96733-6687




6

---





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the duly authorized representatives of the parties have affixed their signatures effective as of
10/22, 2007.

|CALAVO: |  | MPC:                              
|------- |  | ----------------------------------
|By:     |  | /s/ Lee Cole                      
|        |  | Lee Cole, CEO
Calavo Growers, Inc.
|        |  |                                   
|        |  |                                   

7

---



QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 30, 2014, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Sematech, Inc. d/b/a International Sematech (“SEMATECH”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, TowerJazz Panasonic Semiconductor Co., Ltd., Uozo City, JAPAN, has been added as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and SEMATECH intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On April 22, 1988, SEMATECH filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on May 19, 1988 (53 FR 17987).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 1, 2014. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on September 3, 2014 (79 FR 52364).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2014-27986 Filed 11-25-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> BD
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               25,102,108              25,367,894
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0                       0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                                  0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,102,108              25,367,894
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0                       0
<PAYABLES>                                     411,572                 560,759
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0                       0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0                       0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,690,536              24,807,135
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,102,108              25,367,894
<TRADING-REVENUE>                              665,417               (533,759)
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           271,508                 602,841
<COMMISSIONS>                                  631,798               1,409,483
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                  540,386                       0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<COMPENSATION>                                       0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                845,513             (1,340,401)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     845,513             (1,340,401)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   845,513             (1,340,401)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.03                  (9.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     7.03                  (9.59)
        

</TABLE>