alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,482,841
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,641,541
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,641,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,641,541
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,641,541
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               247,226
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               310,047
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (62,821)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (62,821)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (62,821)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cryocon, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vaughn P. Griggs,
Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/ Vaughn P. Griggs

Vaughn P. Griggs
Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

Date May 20, 2003
```
* Judge Williams did not participate in consideration of this

case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 46(d).

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2286

AVIS W. BUTLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ORANGEBURG COUNTY; DONNIE L. HILLIARD, in his

individual and official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-1412-5-6BC)

Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 8, 1999

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS,* and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Avis W. Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Derwood Lorraine Aydlette, III,

GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ & BETTIS, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellees.
* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate

judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(c) (1994).

2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Avis W. Butler appeals from the magistrate judge’s order

granting summary judgment to the Defendants on her employment

discrimination suit.* Our review of the record and the magistrate

judge’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the magistrate judge’s reasoning. See Butler v. Orangeburg County, No. CA-97-1412-5-6BC (D.S.C. Aug. 3, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Handbook 44 – 2010 Foreword 

Foreword 

Handbook 44 was first published in 1949, having been preceded by similar handbooks of various designations and 

in several forms, beginning in 1918. 

Handbook 44 is published in its entirety each year following the Annual Meeting of the National Conference on 

Weights and Measures (NCWM). The Committee on Specifications and Tolerances of the NCWM developed the 

2009 Edition with the assistance of the Weights and Measures Division (WMD) of the National Institute of 

Standards and Technology (NIST). This handbook includes amendments endorsed by the 94th National Conference 

on Weights and Measures during its Annual Meeting in 2009. 

NIST has a statutory responsibility for “cooperation with the states in securing uniformity of weights and measures 

laws and methods of inspection.” In partial fulfillment of this responsibility, NIST is pleased to publish these 

recommendations of the NCWM. 

This handbook conforms to the concept of primary use of SI (metric) measurements recommended in the Omnibus 

Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 by citing SI units before inch-pound units where both units appear together 

and placing separate sections containing requirements in SI units before corresponding sections containing 

requirements in inch-pound units. In some cases, however, trade practice is currently restricted to the use of inchpound units; therefore, some requirements in this handbook will continue to specify only inch-pound units until the 

NCWM achieves a broad consensus on the permitted SI units. 

In accord with NIST policy, the meter/liter spellings are used in this document. However, the metre/litre spellings 

are acceptable, and are preferred by the NCWM. 

It should be noted that a space has been inserted instead of commas in all numerical values greater than 9999 in this 

document, following a growing practice, originating in tabular work, to use spaces to separate large numbers into 

groups of three digits. This avoids conflict with the practice in many countries to use the comma as a decimal 

marker. 

iii
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4081 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit judges presiding 

in family law proceedings to request directly taxpayer returns and return 

information. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 31, 2004 

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit 

judges presiding in family law proceedings to request 

directly taxpayer returns and return information. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISCLOSURE OF RETURNS AND RETURN IN4 FORMATION TO JUDGES PRESIDING IN FAM5 ILY LAW PROCEEDINGS. 

6 (a) DISCLOSURE FROM INTERNAL REVENUE SERV7 ICE.—Subsection (l) of section 6103 of the Internal Rev8 enue Code of 1986 (relating to disclosure of returns and 

9 return information for purposes other than tax adminis-
2 

•HR 4081 IH 

1 tration) is amended by adding at the end the following 

2 new paragraph: 

3 ‘‘(21) DISCLOSURE OF RETURN INFORMATION

4 TO THE COURT IN FAMILY LAW PROCEEDINGS.— 

5 ‘‘(A) DISCLOSURE FROM IRS.—The Sec6 retary shall, upon request by an order from a 

7 State or local court, disclose returns and return 

8 information to such court for purposes of, and 

9 only to the extent necessary in, family law pro10 ceedings in such court. 

11 ‘‘(B) DISCLOSURE FROM SOCIAL SECURITY

12 ADMINISTRATION.—Upon written request by an 

13 order from a State or local court, the Commis14 sioner of Social Security shall disclose returns 

15 and return information which have been dis16 closed to the Social Security Administration as 

17 provided by paragraph (1) or (5) of this sub18 section to such court for purposes of, and only 

19 to the extent necessary in, family law pro20 ceedings in such court.’’. 

21 (b) SAFEGUARDS.—Paragraph (4) of section 6103(p) 

22 of such Code (relating to safeguards) is amended by strik23 ing ‘‘or (20)’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘, (20), 

24 or (21)’’. 
3 

•HR 4081 IH 

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to orders entered after the date 

3 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

HANGZHOU CHIC INTELLIGENT 

TECHNOLOGY CO. and UNICORN 

GLOBAL, INC., 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Plaintiffs, Case No. 20-cv-4806 

v. Judge Thomas M. Durkin 

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole 

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND 

UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS 

IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A, 

Defendants. 

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 

Plaintiffs Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., and Unicorn Global, Inc. 

(“Plaintiffs”) seek entry of a preliminary injunction order under 35 U.S.C. § 271. The scope of 

the preliminary injunction is substantially identical to the temporary restraining order entered on 

September 22, 2020. Declarations and Memorandum of Law in Support of this Motion and are 

filed concurrently. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

LOEB & LOEB LLP 

By: /s/ Adam Kelly 

Adam Kelly 

Doug Masters 

Arthur Yuan 

Neil Nandi 

321 North Clark Street, Suite 2300 

Chicago, Illinois 60654 

Tel.: (312) 464-3100 

Fax: (312) 464-3111 

Date: November 20, 2020

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 105 Filed: 11/20/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:3929
2 

Email: akelly@loeb.com 

Email: dmasters@loeb.com 

Email: ayuan@loeb.com 

Email: nnandi@loeb.com 

Christopher Binns (admitted pro hac vice) 

LOEB & LOEB LLP 

345 Park Avenue 

New York, New York 10154 

Tel.: (212) 407-4000 

Fax: (212) 407-4990 

Email: cbinns@loeb.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 105 Filed: 11/20/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:3930
Revealing the magnetism of Weyl 

semimetal CeAlGe

John Peter J. Nunez

SURF Fellowship 2022 - NIST Center for Neutron Research

Mentor: Dr. Jonathan Gaudet
Weyl fermions are massless particles that possesses a high degree of 

mobility and chirality

● Weyl Fermions move rapidly in 

the surface of the single crystal 

with no backscattering that 

inhibits efficiency 

(spin-momentum locking)
CeAlGe is a unique template to study Weyl fermions

● Weyl fermions are not naturally present in 

nature but in CeAlGe, they emerge as 

effective charge carriers that arise from 

breaking inversion and time-reversal 

symmetry.
Bulk heat capacity and magnetic susceptibility measurements both show the 

presence of a magnetic phase transition temperature at approximately 5K.

● 2nd Order Phase Transition - 

(No thermal hysteresis) 

Reference: Hodovanets, H., et al. “Single-Crystal Investigation of the Proposed Type-II Weyl 

Semimetal Cealge.” Physical Review B, vol. 98, no. 24, 2018, 

https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.98.245132.

Figure 1: Heat Capacity Measurement Figure 2: Magnetic Susceptibility
Analysis of neutron diffraction data and calculation of theoretical nuclear 

structure factor, magnetic form factor and spin correlations through MATLAB

CeAlGe

Nuclear Bragg scattering

Magnetic Bragg scattering
Magnetic scattering lies on top of nuclear bragg peak positions, indicating that the 

magnetic unit cell is the same size as its nuclear counterpart
The increase of Bragg scattering onsets around 5K, which is consistent with the 

critical temperature of the magnetic transition observed in bulk thermodynamic 

measurements.
Symmetry analysis of the possible magnetic structures of the Ce spins reveals 

three different types

● Can rule out spin structures with purely 

out-of-plane spin component due to 

observation of magnetic scattering at 

(00L) reflections such as Q=(004)
Symmetry analysis of the possible magnetic structures of the Ce spins reveals 

three different types
Chi-squared refinement of the magnetic moment and the angle (theta) between 

the Ce spins
Conclusion & Future Work 

● The crystal structure of CeAlGe breaks 

inversion symmetry and also has collective 

magnetism (interplay of magnetism and weyl 

fermions can be studied)

● We probed the magnetism of CeAlGe through 

neutron diffraction and we found that the spins 

are forming an in-plane collinear structure (see 

structure on the left). 

● In-field neutron diffraction will be used to 

determine the exact spin orientation and 

Density Functional Theory will be performed 

to look at the influence of the magnetism on the 

electronic band structure of CeAlGe.
Acknowledgements

● Mentor: Jonathan Gaudet

● NCNR: Susana Teixeira, Joseph Dura, Julie Borchers

● SURF: Brandi Toliver
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0212

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

LOUIS TED CAYE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER 

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of 

time to and including July 14, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve

Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

May 16 2023

05/16/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0212
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000837893
<NAME> 88AP
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         375,586
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   87,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               463,386
<PP&E>                                       4,845,828
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,048,862
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,260,352
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,260,352
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,260,352
<SALES>                                        599,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               614,343
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  387,060
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                227,283
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            227,283
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   227,283
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    20.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD MARCH 31, 1998
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         887,297
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  386,185
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,273,482
<PP&E>                                      15,405,791
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,472,306
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,206,967
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,206,967
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,206,967
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               414,931
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  239,746
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   145,899
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
10478.

#### Rogers *v.*Smith.

Decided November 19, 1919.

Complaint; from city court of Eastman—Judge Griffin. March 8, 1919.

*G. W. Atwill, W. M. Morrison,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. H. Milner,*contra.

Jenkins, P. J.

“Private instructions or limitations not known to persons dealing with a general agent can not affect them. In special agencies for a particular purpose, persons dealing with the agent should, examine his authority.” Civil Code (1910), § 3595. Thus, if a special agent exceeds the scope of his authority as pertaining to any of the material elements of the transaction, the principal is not bound. But where, as in this case, it is undisputed that the purchas'e of the goods as made by the agent for the principal was authorized by the principal, and that the goods as thus purchased were accepted and used by the principal, the mere fact that the principal had privately told the agent not to make such purchase from the plaintiff, for the stated reason that the plaintiff had already refused the credit, can not be properly accounted as such a material variation from the agent’s authority as would relieve the principal from payment for the goods actually accepted and retained.

*Judgment*affirmed.

*Stephens and Smith, JJ., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,939
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,332
<ALLOWANCES>                                       803
<INVENTORY>                                     27,111
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,607
<PP&E>                                          45,225
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,552
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,623
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,485
<BONDS>                                          8,361
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            86
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,676
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   101,623
<SALES>                                         50,041
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,041
<CGS>                                           33,527
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,527
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   123
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,379
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,391
<INCOME-TAX>                                       910
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,481
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,481
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
        

</TABLE>