alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### G. W. West *v.*Irving & Campbell.

.Homestead — Land Subject to.

The right of a debtor and his family to a 'homestead extends to land on which he has an actual bona fide residence.

APPEAL FROM FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT.

June 6, 1873.

*Kinkead, Daniell, for appellant.*

*P. H. Johnston, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

It does not appear that the appellant had or claimed his home on the dower estate of his mother. He was not in the possession and had no right to the possession. The statute was intended to secure .insolvent debtors in homesteads that they owned and possessed and this protection against creditors is as much for the benefit of the family of the debtor as the debtor himself. It is not necessary that the debtor should be actually living on the land at the time the execution is levied in order to claim the exemption, but it must be regarded by the debtor as his actual *bona tide*residence, a mere tem- , porary residence would not perhaps deprive him of this right, but where he is- not in the possession of the premises and has his actual residence elsewhere or after having lived upon the land removes from it, making some other place his *bona tide*residence, the right’ to the exemption can not be asserted. If the statute .can be made to apply to the present case the effect would be that every owner of land being a housekeeper with a family, would be entitled to an exemption of $1,000 in. value of the land, whether he ever lived upon it or not. This court has. adhered to this view of the questions presented in too many cases to attempt now to enlarge by judicial construction the operation of this homestead law.

The judgment is *affirmed.*
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steven N. Fischer, certify that:

- I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Mechanical Technology Incorporated; - Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible 
	for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 28, 2010 

y0525 

Order 

 

May 28, 2010 

140991 

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF 

TRANSPORTATION, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140991 

 COA: 296567 

Wayne CC: 09-015581 CK 

DETROIT INTERNATIONAL BRIDGE 

COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY 

OF AMERICA, 

 Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 By order of May 5, 2010, this Court granted immediate consideration and a stay of 

trial court proceedings. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the 

March 17, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because 

we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The 

stay of trial court proceedings is DISSOLVED.
EXHIBIT 31.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE

ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

I, G. Edward Evans, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Neutral Tandem, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Dated: April 26, 2013



|    |  |                                                                      
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | / S / G. EDWARD
EVANS                                                
|    |  | G. Edward Evans Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)
Exhibit 10.6

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                          MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT

     This First Amendment to Management Services Agreement (this "First
Amendment") is entered into by and between Atlas FRM LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company ("Atlas"), and Wood Resources LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (the "Company"), as of December 22, 2004 (the "Effective
Date").

                                    RECITALS

     WHEREAS, pursuant to that Management Services Agreement dated April 4, 2003
(the "Agreement") Atlas performs Services for the Company in consideration of
payment by the Company to Atlas of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) per
annum; and

     WHEREAS, Atlas and the Company have agreed that as of the Effective Time
the aggregate compensation payable by the Company to Atlas for the Services
shall be increased to seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($750,000) per annum;

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these recitals and for other good and
sufficient consideration, receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged,
Atlas and the Company agree as follows:

1.   COMPENSATION.

     In consideration for the performance of the Services pursuant to the
Agreement, Atlas shall be entitled to a Management Fee from the Company in an
amount equal to seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($750,000) per annum,
payable quarterly in advance on the first day of each calendar quarter (and
appropriately prorated if this Amendment shall commence or end on other than the
first day of a calendar quarter).

2.   NO OTHER AMENDMENTS.

     Except as specifically amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.

3.   DEFINED TERMS.

     Terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such
terms in the Agreement.

4.   COUNTERPARTS.

     This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, and each such
counterpart hereof shall be deemed to be an original instrument, but all such
counterparts together shall constitute but one agreement.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be duly
executed as of the date first set forth above.

ATLAS FRM LLC:                      WOOD RESOURCES LLC:


By: /s/ Andrew M. Bursky            By: /s/ Richard Yarbrough
    --------------------------          -------------------------------
Name: Andrew M. Bursky              Name: Richard Yarbrough
Title: Managing Partner             Title: Chief Executive Officer and President


                                        2
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 15-3435

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Terrell Simpson lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________ Submitted: May 6, 2015 Filed: May 17, 2016 [Unpublished]

____________ Before GRUENDER, ARNOLD, SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Terrell Simpson challenges the district court’s 1 finding that he violated the conditions of his supervised release and argues that the district court abused its 1 The Honorable Greg Kays, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.discretion in sentencing him to two years in prison. Additionally, his counsel has moved to withdraw. We conc lude that the district court did not clearly err in its factual findings, or abuse its discretion in sentencing Simpson. See United States v. Miller , 557 F.3d 910, 914-917 (8th Cir. 2009) (standards of review); United States v. Meyer , 483 F.3d 865, 869 (8th Cir. 2007) (discussing reliability of sweat-patch results). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s moti on to withdraw, and we affirm the judgment of the district court.

______________________________

-2-
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of US Dataworks, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based
on such evaluation;c)
    
    disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Charles E. RameyCharles E. Ramey,Chief Executive Officer
#### Josiah S. Joplin, etc., *v.*C. E. Raddin, etc.

Appeal — Jurisdiction—Amount of Controversy.

. Tbe Court of' Appeals has jurisdiction on appeal of a judgment for $42.21 against an assignor of a lease for repairs of the leased premises made toy the lessee.

Landlord and Tenant — Repairs.

On the assignment of a lease, and in the absence of an express covenant on the pant of the assignee to make repairs on the leased premises, the law will not imply such a promise.

APPEAL PROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT,

April 19, 1873.

OPINION by

Judge Peters:

On the 1st of December, 1869, Cochran, as executor of T. E. Wilson, deceased, leased to Reynolds & Joplin a certain six-story brick warehouse in the city of Louisville for the term of three years at an annual rent of $5,500, payable monthly, and the lessees covenanted that they would at the end of the term', or if the lease should be forfeited, return the premises in as good order as when received, ordinary wear and loss by fire without the tenant’s fault, and destruction or injury by the act of God excepted.

The lessees assigned the lease to Raddin & Co. on the 13th of June, 1871, with the assent of the lessor. The assignees entered into possession of the leased premises prior to September, 1871, and ' finding the house needing repairs, had some glazing and other work done to the amount of $42.21, and then warranted their assignors for the same.

The justice who tried the warrant dismissed it; they then appealed to the Jefferson County Court, and then succeeded in recovering *662judgment for the amount claimed, and from that judgment Joplin &; Co. have appealed to this court.

*Badjer & McGuire, for apjfellmts.*

*Mundy, for appellees.*

As to the question of the jurisdiction of this court, raised by the attorney for appellees, we must regard that as not now an open question; the jurisdiction of the court in like cases was sustained in *Commercial Bank v. Benedict, etc.,*18 B. M. 307, and in subsequent cases.

When appellees took the assignment of the lease and entered on the leased premises the repairs were needed which they subsequently had made, and still they neither took the written obligation nor parol promise of appellant to have them made; but in the assignment ap-pellees expressly assumed to perform! all the covenants that their assignors were bound to perform, one of which was to return the premises in as good repair as when received; and in order to discharge that undertalcing it may have been necessary for them to have the repairs made. But in the absence of an express covenant on the part of appellants to make the repairs, the law will not imply a promise to make them.

The judgment must therefore be reversed and the cause remanded with directions to affirm the judgment of the justice dismissing the warrant.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3884 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 191
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3884

                          [Report No. 108-557]

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 615 East Houston Street in San Antonio, Texas, as the ``Hipolito F. 
        Garcia Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 2004

 Mr. Gonzalez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                             June 21, 2004

       Additional sponsors: Mr. Smith of Texas and Mr. Rodriguez

                             June 21, 2004

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 615 East Houston Street in San Antonio, Texas, as the ``Hipolito F. 
        Garcia Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 615 
East Houston Street in San Antonio, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Hipolito F. Garcia Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``Hipolito F. Garcia Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

                                                 House Calendar No. 191

108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3884

                          [Report No. 108-557]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 615 East Houston Street in San Antonio, Texas, as the ``Hipolito F. 
        Garcia Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 21, 2004

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3831 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3831

     To extend the sunset on the assault weapons ban for 10 years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2004

 Mr. Castle (for himself, Mrs. McCarthy of New York, Mr. Tom Davis of 
Virginia, Mr. Shays, Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut, Mr. Kirk, Mr. Quinn, 
and Ms. Ros-Lehtinen) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the sunset on the assault weapons ban for 10 years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SUNSET ON ASSAULT WEAPONS BAN FOR 10 YEARS.

    Section 110105(2) of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement 
Act of 1994 (18 U.S.C. 921 note) is amended by inserting ``, or in the 
case of the amendments made by section 110102, 20 years,'' after ``10 
years''.
                                 <all>
```
----

----

----

| By: |                                                                                                                                                                                                                    /s/   Name NotLegible |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
6.670 6.671 6.672 6.673 6.674 6.675

−700 −600 −500 −400 −300 −200 −100 0 100 200 300

G / (10−11 m3 kg−1 s−2)

(G − GCODATA)/GCODATA x 106

Luther & Towler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 121 (1982).

Karagioz & Izmailov, Izmeritel. Tekh. 10, 3 (1996).

Bagley & Luther, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3047 (1997).

Gundlach & Merkowitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2869 (2000).

Quinn et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 111101 (2001).

Kleinevoß, PhD thesis Universität Wuppertal (2002). 2 pendula

Armstrong & Fitzgerald, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 201101 (2003).

Schlamminger et al., Phys. Rev. D 74, 082001 (2006). beam balance

Tu et al., Phys. Rev. D 82, 022001 (2010).

Parks & Faller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 110801 (2010). 2 pendula

Quinn et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 111, 101102 (2013).

Rosi et al., Nature 510, 518 (2014). atom interferometer

Newman et al., Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 372, 20140025 (2014).
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of Laxai Pharma, Ltd. (the "Company") for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, I, Naren Mallakunta, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1.           Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  August 19, 2010
LAXAI PHARMA, LTD.By:
/s/ Naren MallakuntaNaren Mallakunta