alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

JOHN M. MARSZALEK, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. 

BRENDAN KELLY, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 20-cv-4270

Hon. Mary M. Rowland

JOINT STATUS REPORT

The Plaintiffs, Illinois State Rifle Association and Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., 

and the Defendants, Illinois State Police Director, Brendan F. Kelly, in his official capacity as 

the Director of the Illinois State Police, and Gregory Hacker, in his official capacity as Bureau 

Chief of the Illinois State Police Firearms Services Bureau, by their respective attorneys, submit 

this Joint Status report:

Defendants have informed Plaintiffs and this Court that the backlog of applications for 

Firearm Owner Identification Cards was eliminated on or about December 21, 2022, and that all 

applications are being processed within the deadlines established by statute. The Parties believe 

that this case can be resolved, and Defendants are preparing a declaration affirming that the 

backlog has been eliminated and outlining the procedures that have been put in place to prevent 

applications from not being processed within the statutory deadlines in the future.

Defendants require an additional 45 days, or until Monday, September 26, 2022, to 

finalize this declaration, submit the declaration to Plaintiffs for review, and determine if this case 

Case: 1:20-cv-04270 Document #: 122 Filed: 08/10/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:762
can be resolved without further discovery or motion practice. Plaintiffs have no objection to 

Defendants taking additional time to prepare and submit this declaration for their review.

As such, the Parties believe it is appropriate to set a deadline for the Parties to file another 

joint status report on September 29, 2022, to update the Court on the status of the declaration and 

provide a proposal as to Parties’ position on how to proceed.

August 10, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Mary A. Johnston /s/David G. Sigale

Mary A. Johnston David G. Sigale

Office of the Illinois Attorney General Law Firm of David G. Sigale P.C.

100 West Randolph Street 460 West Roosevelt Road

Chicago, Illinois 60601 Wheaton, IL 60187

(312) 814-4417 (630) 452-4547

Mary.johnston@ilag.gov dsigale@sigalelaw.com

Counsel for Defendants Attorney for Plaintiffs

/s/Gregory A. Bedell /s/Timothy Sandefur

Gregory A. Bedell Timothy Sandefur

Knabe & Bedell Goldwater Institute

33 North Dearborn Street, 10th Floor 500 E. Coronado Road

Chicago, IL 60602 Phoenix, AZ 85004

(312) 977-9119 (602) 462-5000

gbedell@kkbchicago.com litigation@goldwaterinstitute.org

Attorney for Plaintiffs Attorney for Plaintiffs

Case: 1:20-cv-04270 Document #: 122 Filed: 08/10/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:763
NCST Technical Investigation of 

Hurricane Maria (Puerto Rico)

Emergency Communications and Evacuation

Project Leader: Katherine J. Johnson (Jo), Social Scientist

Objective: To investigate the role of emergency communications in 

public response for those under imminent threat from Hurricane 

Maria. This project will also investigate the use of communications in 

disaster response (during and immediately after the hurricane event). 

NCST Advisory Committee Meeting, June 30, 2020
Motivation Project falls under two duties of the NCST, to: 

• evaluate technical aspects of evacuation and 

emergency response procedures, and recommend 

research or other appropriate actions needed to 

improve evacuation and emergency response 

procedures.

In the NIST memo to recommend the Hurricane 

Maria Investigation, the purpose is further 

tailored to needs in Puerto Rico to:

• characterize the performance of emergency 

communications systems and the public’s response 

to such communications. 

2
Background: 

Evacuation and emergency response 

challenges found during NIST’s Preliminary 

Reconnaissance Mission

• Category 5 Hurricane Maria preceded by Irma two 

weeks prior 

• Heterogeneous terrain across the island posed 

multiple risks requiring different protective actions 

(flooding and storm surge, winds, landslides)

• Societal preference for sheltering-in-place

• Extended lack of communication among emergency 

officials, building officials, and the public after the storm

• Many people required rescues; in particular from 

multiple flooded towns across the island

3
Project Goals

Goal 1: Characterize the use of 

emergency communication (technology 

and information) before, during, and 

after the hurricane.

Goal 2: Identify the factors that 

influenced the public’s decision to take 

protection (evacuate) prior to the 

hurricane, and to understand the role of 

emergency communications in that 

decision.

4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                          
        <S> <C>
                                                   
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                                                   
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB.
                                                   
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
                                                   
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                            143,913
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                   1,174,640
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,410,647
<PP&E>                              5,656
<DEPRECIATION>                       (143)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,416,160
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              43,882
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                     1,427,700
<COMMON>                        1,472,055
<OTHER-SE>                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,416,160
<SALES>                            28,483
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   28,483
<CGS>                              86,572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      86,572
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  111,948
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (170,037)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                     (170,037)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (.05)
                                                   
                                                   
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2

IEA Income Fund IX, L.P.

CERTIFICATIONS
Rule 13a-14

I, John Kallas, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IEA Income Fund
IX, L.P. (the Registrant);

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (CCC), the
General Partner of the Registrant, and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:

(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared; and

(b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

(c)  disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting.

5.     CCCs other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrants auditors and the Audit Committee of Registrants Board of
Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the Registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
Registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2003

/s/ JOHN KALLAS
John Kallas
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of CCC
Unassociated Document


    

      October
        26, 2005

      


      


      


      Christopher
        Maggiore

      6860
        Chillingsworth Circle

      Canton,
        Ohio 44718

      


      This
        letter is to confirm that in connection with the Stock Subscription and Options
        Agreements dated June 20, 2005 between you and Invisa, Inc., the term over
        which
        options may be exercised has been extended to August 31, 2006. All other
        provisions of the Agreements shall remain in full force and effect.

      


      


      


      by:
        ___________________________________

      Stephen
        A. Michael, 

      Acting
        President
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

Judith Almendariz, Individually and On ) 

Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Case No.: 20-cv-4906

v. )

) Honorable Joan B. Gottschall

OneSpan Inc., Scott Clements, and )

Mark S. Hoyt, )

)

Defendants. )

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the order entered April 21, 2021, and the proof of publication filed 

April 27, 2021, it is ordered and adjudged that the above-captioned civil action be, and it hereby 

is, dismissed without prejudice. This is a final judgment.

Dated: April 28, 2021 /s/

Joan B. Gottschall

United States District Judge

Case: 1:20-cv-04906 Document #: 63 Filed: 04/28/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:506
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Mercari Communications Group, Ltd.. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended August 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Robert W. Marsik, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: June
18, 2004 |  | By:/s/  Robert W. Marsik
      Robert W. Marsik, Chief Executive Officer
      Chief Financial Officer
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating,  acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of  this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 4.34
 Third Amended and Restated Exclusive Purchase Right Agreement
 Registered Address:
 ID No.:  Address: th
 Registered Address: nd ,  Legal Representative:
 Registered Address:  Legal Representative:
 WHEREAS:
      Chapter One. Purchases and Sale of Equity Interest
 Authorizations




---



##### 



Steps
  Purchase Price
  Transfer of the Purchased Equity Interest
     Payment




---



##### 



Chapter Two. Promises Relating Equity Interest
 Promises Relating Party C
             Promises Relating Party B
 Party B promises:




---



##### 



Promises Relating Party D
  Representations and Warranties
 Representations and Warranties of Party B and Party C
 Party B and Party C




---



##### 



Effective Date
  Applicable Law and Dispute Resolution
 Applicable Law
  Dispute Resolution




---



##### 



Taxes and Expenses
  Notices
  Party A:  Address:  Fax:  Tel:  Addressee:
 Party B:  Address: th  Fax:
Tel:




---



##### 



Party C:  Registered Address: nd ,  Fax:  Tel:  Addressee:
 Party D:  Address:  Fax:  Tel:  Addressee:
 Confidentiality
  Further Warranties
  Miscellaneous
 Amendment, Modification and Supplement
  Observance of Laws and Regulations
  Entire Contract




---



##### 



Headings
  Language
  Severability
  Successor
  Survival
   Waiver
   Party
A:
 Signature of Authorized Representative:
    
    /s/ Chris Chan
 Party
B:
 Signature:
    
    /s/ Jack Wang
 Party
C:
 Signature of Authorized Representative:
    
    /s/ Justin Tang
 Official Seal:
 Party
D:
 Signature of Authorized Representative:
    
    /s/ Justin Tang
 Official Seal:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 00-21088 Summary Calendar

United States of America, Plaintiff - Appellee,

VERSUS
Hoa Duy Dinh, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas, Houston

(H-00-CR-238-1) January 24, 2003

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges,
PER CURIAM: * Hoa Duy Dinh (Dinh) was found guilty by a jury of conspiracy to commit extortion and sixteen counts of extortion in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951. The evidence presented established that Dinh and three others extorted U.S. Currency,2

alcohol, and cigarettes from the owner of Vu Bida Billiards, a pool hall located in a suburb of the City of Houston and catering principally to Vietnamese and other Asian customers. The victims accuse Dinh of using physical force and threats of physical and economic harm in order to obtain money from the victims. The government proffered that Vu Bida Billiards affected interstate commerce and that the assets of the business were depleted by the conduct of Dinh, resulting in the closure of Vu Bida Billiards as a result of the extortion. At the close of all evidence at the trial, Dinh made a motion for acquittal, arguing that the government failed to show that Vu Bida Billiards was engaged in interstate commerce. The trial court denied the motion and ultimately sentenced Dinh to a total of 420 months imprisonment. Dinh filed a timely Notice of Appeal. Final resolution of this appeal was placed on hold pending a final resolution by this court sitting en banc in the case of United States v. James McFarland, Jr. , No. 00-10569, which also involved prosecutions by the federal government under the Hobbs Act for local activities (robberies of local convenience stores), in which McFarland argued that the aggregation principle was not available to establish the required interference with interstate commerce, thus contending that the Hobbs Act could not constitutionally be applied to such conduct. On October 28, 2002, the en banc court in McFarland entered a Per Curiam Order3 g:\opin-sc\00-21088.opn.wpd which stated:

By reason of an equally divided en banc court, we affirm the district court's judgment of conviction and sentence. We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts, and relevant portions of the record here in Dinh . The en banc decision in McFarland described above did not produce any change in the law of this circuit relating to the applicability of the Hobbs Act to local activities affecting interstate commerce from what it was at the time of the entry of judgment of conviction and sentence against Dinh in this case. See United States v. Robinson , 119 F.3d 1205 (5th Cir. 1997); United States v. Ferguson , 211 F.3d 820, 885 (5th Cir. 2000); United States v. Jennings , 95 F.3d 795, 800 (5th Cir. 1999). Accordingly we
AFFIRM the judgment of conviction and sentence as entered by the district court.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

XYZ CORPORATION,

PLAINTIFF,

V.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”

DEFENDANTS.

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:20-CV-05058

SCHEDULE A – SEALED DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO LR26.2

Pursuant to Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Documents under Seal, a full version of 

Schedule “A” will be electronically-filed under seal and will remain under seal until further order 

of this Court. 

Dated: August 27, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Ann Marie Sullivan

Ann Marie Sullivan

Alison Carter

AM Sullivan Law, LLC

1440 W. Taylor St., Suite 515

Chicago, Illinois 60607

Telephone: 224-258-9378

E-mail: ams@amsullivanlaw.com

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

Case: 1:20-cv-05058 Document #: 1-3 Filed: 08/27/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:20
#### GILHAM *v.*THE STATE.

No. 6872.

December 14, 1928.

*Branch & Howard*and *Claude D. Bowe,*for plaintiff in error.

*George M. Napier, attorney-general, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, T. B. Gress, assistant attorney-general, John H. Hudson,*and *J. W. LeCraw,*contra.

Gilbert, J.

Will Gilham was convicted of murder. He moved for a new trial, which was refused, and he excepted. The motion is based solely upon the contention that the verdict is not supported by evidence. The evidence supports the verdict. The testimony of the accomplice was corroborated by facts and circumstances sufficient to authorize a jury to return a verdict of guilty.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ NOVA CHEMICALS CORPORATION (CANADA), NOVA CHEMICALS INC. (DELAWARE), Plaintiffs

- Appellants

v.

DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY , Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2015

- 1257

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:13

- cv

- 01601

- LPS, Chief Judge Leonar d P. Stark.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
D ONALD R OBERT D UNNER , Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs

- appellants. Also represented by M ARK J. F ELDSTEIN , D ARREL C HRISTOPHER K ARL

.

H ARRY J. R OPER , Jenner & Block LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for defendant

- appellee. Also represented by A

ARON A. B ARLOW , P AUL D AVID M ARGOLIS , A NTON R. V

ALUKAS ; W ILLIAM A DAMS , R AYMOND N. N IMROD ,K ATHLEEN M. S ULLIVAN , C LELAND B. W ELTON , II, Quinn Emanue l Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY.

______________________
T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST , Chief Judge, D YK and W ALLACH , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

June 9, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         202,485
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  194,545
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     21,353
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               616,676
<PP&E>                                         123,585
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,770,385
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          399,824
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,723
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,122,594
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,770,385
<SALES>                                        669,337
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               669,337
<CGS>                                           93,347
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   93,347
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               570,916
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,074
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,074
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,074
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>