alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,957
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,021
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,987
<PP&E>                                          56,592
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 253,692
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,966
<BONDS>                                        302,889
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       189,670
<OTHER-SE>                                   (257,164)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   253,692
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,713
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,779
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,975
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,270)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,270)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,270)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.71)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          40,977
<SECURITIES>                                     9,778
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,621
<ALLOWANCES>                                       377
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,030
<PP&E>                                         116,855
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 356,466
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,647
<BONDS>                                        307,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   356,466
<SALES>                                         19,099
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,099
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,741
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,560
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (25,202)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,202)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (25,202)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.28)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.9

                Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Patriot Scientific
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended November 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Lowell W. Giffhorn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         3)       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         4)       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                                    /S/ LOWELL W. GIFFHORN
                                                    ----------------------
                                                    Name:  Lowell W. Giffhorn
                                                    Title:  Exec. V.P. and CFO
                                                    Date: January 22, 2003
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**MAXXAM INC.**

 

**PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

 

Listed below are MAXXAM Inc.'s principal subsidiaries as of December 31,2006, organized by business segment, and the jurisdiction of their incorporationor organization. Certain subsidiaries have been omitted which, when consideredin the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significantsubsidiary.

 

FOREST PRODUCTS OPERATIONS:

 

REAL ESTATE OPERATIONS:

 

RACE PARK OPERATIONS:

 

OTHER:
Exhibit (23)





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
Nos. 333-155981, 333-125664, 333-68220 and 333-44471 on Forms S-8 of our reports
February 20, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Met-Pro Corporation for the fiscal year ended January 31,
2009.





/s/
      Margolis & Company P.C.Bala
      Cynwyd, PennsylvaniaFebruary
      20, 2009
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of Laxai Pharma, Ltd. (the "Company") for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, I, J. Ram Ajjarapu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1.           Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  August 19, 2010
LAXAI PHARMA, LTD.By:
/s/ J. Ram AjjarapuJ. Ram Ajjarapu
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DDi Capital Corp.  (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce D. McMaster, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the
best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                    
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|Date: August 19, 2003 | By: | /s/ BRUCE D. MCMASTER                     | 
|--------------------- | --- | ----------------------------------------- | 
|                      |     |                                           | 
|                      |     | Bruce D. McMaster Chief Executive Officer | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to DDi Capital Corp.
and will be retained by DDi Capital Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Although it has no prac tical effec t beca use the pa rties’ settlement a g ree ment calls for a June 30, 1 2008, move-out date , the dismissal of the petition for writ of mandamus and the under lying a ppeal results in the dissoluti on of the stay b ec au s e we no long er ha ve a c ase ove r which w e have jurisdiction to protect. SeeTex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(a) (West 2004). 

### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-0 7 -00 524 -CV

M ar ia H e r nande z , A ppe lla nt

v . Harvey Ashton Wilson , Appellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 53RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- GN-07- 0017 72 , HO NORAB LE MARGARET A. COO P ER , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N
In October

2007, this Court gra

nted re lator Mar i a May a He rnande z’s moti on fo r e me rg e nc y

re lie f t o h a lt a

n evi cti on . T he mot ion

fo r t e mpo ra

ry re lie f w a s f

ile d a nc ill ary to Her nandez’s petition for wr it of mandamus, or, a lternatively writ of i njunction. This court g rante d relief in order to pr otect our jurisdiction over the subject matter

of the manda

mus and the under lying appea l. See I

n re Maria May a Hernande z , s lip op., No. 03 -0 7- 00 62 0- CV(T e x. Ap p. —Aus tin October 30, 2007). The pa rties have now filed a

joint agr eed motion to d i s m i s s the appe al base d on a settlement ag ree ment. See Te x. R. Ap p. P. 42 .1 (a ). Ac c or din g ly , w e g ra nt t he mot ion

and dis mis s the a pp e a l. Id
.

12 W. Kenneth L aw, Chief Justice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Pembe rton and Waldrop Dismissed on Ag ree d Motion Filed: June 5, 2008
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3959

To amend title 49, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting through the Under Secretary for Border and Transportation Security, to provide air marshal training to law enforcement 

personnel of foreign countries. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2004

Mr. LOBIONDO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of Homeland Security, acting through the 

Under Secretary for Border and Transportation Security, 

to provide air marshal training to law enforcement personnel of foreign countries.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FEDERAL AIR MARSHAL TRAINING. 

4 Section 44917 of title 49, United States Code, is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(d) TRAINING FOR FOREIGN LAW ENFORCEMENT

7 PERSONNEL.—
2

•HR 3959 IH 

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Under Secretary may 

2 direct the Federal Air Marshal Service to provide air 

3 marshal training to law enforcement personnel of 

4 foreign countries. 

5 ‘‘(2) FEES.—The Under Secretary shall estab6 lish reasonable fees and charges to pay expenses in7 curred in carrying out this subsection. Money col8 lected under this subsection shall be credited to the 

9 account in the Treasury from which the expenses 

10 were incurred and shall be available to the Under 

11 Secretary for those expenses.’’.

Æ
`[MHC LOGO]               McGovern, Hurley, Cunningham, LLP
[GRAPHIC OMITTED]        Chartered Accountants




                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



TO:         NORTHWESTERN MINERAL VENTURES INC.
            ("NORTHWESTERN")

AND TO:     BERNS & BERNS, COUNSELORS AT LAW

AND TO:     U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FROM:       MCGOVERN, HURLEY, CUNNINGHAM, LLP

RE:         NORTHWESTERN MINERAL VENTURES INC. - AUDITED ANNUAL FINANCIAL
            STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIODS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005, 2004, AND 2003

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We hereby consent to the inclusion of our report dated March 3, 2006 in
connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements of
Northwestern as at December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the periods ended
December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003 in Northwestern's Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2005 ("Form 20-F"), for the purposes of filing
same with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.



Dated this 29th day of June, 2006.


                                MCGOVERN, HURLEY, CUNNINGHAM, LLP

                                /s/ McGovern, Hurley, Cunningham, LLP
                                -------------------------------------

                                Chartered Accountants












     2005 Sheppard Avenue East, Suite 300, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2J 5B4
                Telephone: (416) 496-1234 - Fax: (416) 496-0125 -
                 E-Mail: info@mhc-ca.com - Website: www.mhc-ca.com`
<PAGE>   1
   
    

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
Wireless International, Inc.:

We consent to the use of our report included herein and to the reference to our
firm under the heading "Experts" in the registration statement.


                                             KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Dallas, Texas

   
May 12, 1998
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00322-CV

MANUEL DIAZ, JR. APPELLANT

V.

MELISSA ANN DIAZ APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF WICHITA COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On December 20, 2012, we notified appellant that his brief had not been 

filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. 

App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution 

unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court 

within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for 

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ. 

DELIVERED: January 24, 2013
IDAHO

71-234.MISREPRESENTATION OF PRICE PROHIBITED -- FRACTIONS OF 

CENTS. Whenever any commodity or service is sold, or is offered, 

exposed, or advertised for sale, by weight, measure, or count, the 

price shall not be misrepresented, nor shall the price be represented 

in any manner calculated or tending to mislead or deceive an actual or 

prospective purchaser. Whenever an advertised, posted, or labeled 

price per unit of weight, measure, or count includes a fraction of a 

cent, all elements of the fraction shall be prominently displayed and 

the numeral or numerals expressing the fraction shall be immediately 

adjacent to, of the same general design and style as, and at least 

one-half (1/2) the height and width of the numerals representing the 

whole cents.
---

Exhibit
32.2





Certification of Chief Financial
Officer


Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
officer of MAXXAM Inc., a Delaware corporation (the ACompany@), does
hereby certify that:





(a)           the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2007
of the Company (the AReport@) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:   April
30,
2008                                                                                            /S/    M.
EMILY MADISON


M. Emily
Madison


Chief Financial
Officer











The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code).





---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4157 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4157

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prevent the alternative 
 minimum tax from effectively repealing the Federal tax exemption for 
          interest on State and local private activity bonds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 2004

 Mr. Neal of Massachusetts (for himself and Mr. Israel) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prevent the alternative 
 minimum tax from effectively repealing the Federal tax exemption for 
          interest on State and local private activity bonds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX ON PRIVATE ACTIVITY BONDS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 57 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to items of tax preference) is amended 
by striking paragraph (5).
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Subparagraph (B) of section 1(g)(7) of such Code is 
        amended by adding ``and'' at the end of clause (i), by striking 
        ``, and'' at the end of clause (ii) and inserting a period, and 
        by striking clause (iii).
            (2) Subclause (II) of section 53(d)(1)(B)(ii) of such Code 
        is amended by striking ``, (5)''.
            (3) Paragraph (3) of section 148(b) of such Code is amended 
        to read as follows:
            ``(3) Exception for tax-exempt bonds.--The term `investment 
        property' does not include any tax-exempt bond.''
            (4) Subparagraph (B) of section 149(g)(3) of such Code is 
        amended to read as follows:
                    ``(B) Exception for investment in tax-exempt 
                bonds.--Such term shall not include any bond issued as 
                part of an issue 95 percent of the net proceeds of 
                which are invested in bonds the interest on which is 
                not includible in gross income under section 103.''
            (5) Paragraph (5) of section 1400L(d) of such Code is 
        amended by striking subparagraph (E).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             142
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,373
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (185)
<INVENTORY>                                     12,431
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,376
<PP&E>                                          18,662
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,727)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,452
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               71
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,937
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,682
<SALES>                                         13,865
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,865
<CGS>                                            9,766
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,406
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    51
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    10
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 183
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    449
<INCOME-TAX>                                       208
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                241
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       241
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04


</TABLE>
Although it has no practical effect because the parties’ settlement agreement calls for a June 30, 1

2008, move-out date, the dismissal of the petition for writ of mandamus and the underlying appeal

results in the dissolution of the stay because we no longer have a case over which we have

jurisdiction to protect. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(a) (West 2004).

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00524-CV

Maria Hernandez, Appellant

v.

Harvey Ashton Wilson, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 53RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-07-001772, HONORABLE MARGARET A. COOPER, JUDGE PRESIDING 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

In October 2007, this Court granted relator Maria Maya Hernandez’s motion

for emergency relief to halt an eviction. The motion for temporary relief was filed ancillary to

Hernandez’s petition for writ of mandamus, or, alternatively writ of injunction. This court granted

relief in order to protect our jurisdiction over the subject matter of the mandamus and the underlying

appeal. See In re Maria Maya Hernandez, slip op., No. 03-07-00620-CV (Tex. App.—Austin

October 30, 2007).

The parties have now filed a joint agreed motion to dismiss the appeal based on a

settlement agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss

the appeal. Id.

1
2

 

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop

Dismissed on Agreed Motion

Filed: June 5, 2008