alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                     MAYTAG CORPORATION
                                         Exhibit 12
                             Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                       (Amounts in thousands of dollars except ratios)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               Year Ended December 31
                                                        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             2000           1999           1998           1997           1996
                                                             ----           ----           ----           ----           ----
<S>                                                       <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Consolidated pretax income from continuing
 operations before minority interest and
 extraordinary item                                     $    331,959   $    530,851   $    470,885   $    300,555   $    228,237

Interest expense                                              64,133         53,287         57,149         53,625         43,006

Mark to market adjustment on interest rate
 swap included in interest expense                             6,295          5,972          5,616          5,370

Depreciation of capitalized interest                           2,643          2,750          2,952          2,530          1,553

Interest portion of rental expense                             8,166          7,740          7,764          6,989          6,448
                                                          ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
Earnings                                                  $  413,196     $  600,600     $  544,366     $  369,069     $  279,244
                                                          ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========

Interest expense (excluding swap mark to market)          $   70,428     $   59,259     $   62,765     $   58,995     $   43,006

Interest capitalized                                             552             72             17          4,191          8,905

Interest portion of rental expense                             8,166          7,740          7,764          6,989          6,448
                                                          ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
Fixed charges                                             $   79,146     $   67,071     $   70,546     $   70,175     $   58,359
                                                          ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                              5.22           8.95           7.72           5.26           4.78
                                                          ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========     ==========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

November 12, 2001

Koger Equity, Inc.
433 Plaza Real, Suite 335
Boca Raton, Florida 33432


We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Koger Equity, Inc. and subsidiaries for the periods ended
September 30, 2001 and 2000, as indicated in our report dated October 26, 2001;
because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on such financial
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-55179 of Koger
Equity, Inc. on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-54617 of Koger Equity,
Inc. on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-20975 of Koger Equity, Inc. on
Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-23429 of Koger Equity, Inc. on Form
S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-37919 of Koger Equity, Inc. on Form S-3,
Registration Statement No. 333-33388 of Koger Equity, Inc. on Form S-8 and
Registration Statement No. 333-38712 of Koger Equity, Inc. on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statements prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
West Palm Beach, Florida
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
We hereby consent to the use in the Prospectus constituting part of this
Registration Statement on Form S-1 of CSK Auto Corporation of our report dated
December 23, 1997 relating to the financial statements of CSK Auto Corporation,
which appears in such Prospectus. We also consent to the application of such
report to the Financial Statement Schedule for the two years ended January 28,
1996 listed under Item 16(b) of this Registration Statement when such schedule
is read in conjunction with the financial statements referred to in our report.
The audits referred to in such report also included this schedule. We also
consent to the references to us under the headings "Experts" and "Selected
Financial Data" in such Prospectus. However, it should be noted that Price
Waterhouse LLP has not prepared or certified such "Selected Financial Data".
 
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP


 



Phoenix, Arizona
March 2, 1998
### Order entered October 19, 2012

In The

No. 05-12-00573-CV CKH FAM~Y LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL., Appellants V. MGD/CCP ACQUISTION, LLC, ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-I 1-00382-D



### ORDER The Court has before it appellees’ October 18, 2012 unopposed second motion for extension of time to file their brief. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS appellees to file their brief by November 6, 2012. No further extensions will be granted absent a showing of 

### exceptional circumstances.

MOLLY JUSTICE
##### 



42      The May Department Stores Company Exhibit 32 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. § 1350, As Adopted) In connection with the Annual Report of The May Department Stores Company (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending January 29, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, John L.
Dunham, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer, and Thomas D. Fingleton, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: March 25, 2005 /s/
    
    John L. Dunham
    
    
    
    /s/
    
    Thomas D. FingletonJohn L. Dunham
    
    
    
    
    
    Thomas D. FingletonChairman, President and
    
    
    
    
    
    Executive Vice President andChief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    
    
    Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 4.12  


        FBL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.  


OFFER TO EXCHANGE  


$75,000,000 PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF ITS 5.85% SENIOR NOTES DUE 2014 WHICH HAVE BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, FOR ANY AND ALL 5.85% SENIOR NOTES
DUE 2014.  


Instructions from Beneficial Owner 


        The
undersigned acknowledge(s) receipt of your letter and the enclosed Prospectus and the related Letter of Transmittal in connection with the offer by the Company to exchange the
Exchange Notes for Outstanding Notes. 


        This
will instruct you to tender the principal amount of Outstanding Notes indicated below held by you for the account of the undersigned, upon the terms and subject to the conditions
set forth in the Prospectus and the related Letter of Transmittal. 


        The
undersigned represents that (i) the Exchange Notes acquired pursuant to the Exchange Offer are being obtained in the ordinary course of the undersigned's business,
(ii) the undersigned is not engaging, does not intend to engage, and has no arrangement or understanding with any person to participate in the distribution of such Exchange Notes,
(iii) the undersigned is not an "affiliate," as defined under Rule 405 of the Securities Act, of the Company and (iv) the undersigned is not acting on behalf of any person or
entity that could not truthfully make these statements. If the undersigned is a broker-dealer, it acknowledges that it will deliver a copy of the Prospectus in connection with any resale of the
Exchange Notes. 



	 	 	Sign Here
	

 	
 	

 Signature(s)
	

Securities which are to be tendered:	
 	

 
	

Tender all of the Outstanding Notes	
 	

 
	

        Aggregate Principal Amount*	
 	

 
	

o    Outstanding Notes                         	
 	

 
	

                Name(s) (Please Print)	
 	

 
	

                Address	
 	

 
	

                Zip Code	
 	

 
	

                Area Code and Telephone No.	
 	

 
	

Dated:
                                         
       , 2004	
 	

 






	*
	Unless
otherwise indicated, it will be assumed that all of the Outstanding Notes listed are to be tendered.
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 23

                        Consent of Independent Auditors



Shareowners and Board of Directors
Maytag Corporation

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Number
33-22228, Registration Statement Number 333-46752, and Registration Statement
Number 333-36054 on Forms S-8; and Registration Statement Number 333-75827 on
Form S-3 of Maytag Corporation and in the related Prospectuses of our report
dated January 23, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of Maytag Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 2000.


                                                     Ernst & Young LLP


                                                     Chicago, Illinois
                                                     March 16, 2001
. 

‘i^ . 

i . . 

.. 

. . 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

April 15, 1939 

Honorable E. Ii. Thornton, Jr. 

Chairman, Appropriations CommIttee 

House or Reprewntatives 

Austin, fexas 

or the Unirerelty,oS %xaSb~., 

Wth reepeat to eqtippin$'saafd building6 Snaoiar ae 

euoh eqni~,ent. is not'alYixed.to ziaid buildings. e+id.. not made, 

permanent f~provmnimte thereof,'it &,s%he opinion & this department thst suoh aqti$mmt does r.wt'ocIlld undqr the prorislon 
Honorable E. H. Thornton, Jr., April 15, 1939, Page 2 

of' Seotion 14 of Artlole 7 or the Constitution of Texas. Article 

.2591-A, Section 6, of the Revised Civil Statues of 1925, ae 

amended, authorizes the Board'of Direotors of the Agricultural 

and Meohanloal College of Texas to borroa not more than tw.mil- 

. lion dollare for the erection and equipment of permanent bulldloge at said Coll+ge, and other purposes therein set out, and 

pledge one-third of the Available Unlversltp Fund as seourity 

ror the payment of the principal and interest. on said bonds. 

&rtiole 2592 of the Reriaed Clvll Stattltes of 1925, ae amended,‘ 

provldos that tha Board oi.Dlreators of the Agrloultural and 

Pbahanieal College of Ihxas ahall with the approval of the 

Le&olaturo, expinb tor eonatmdon of bullaingo on the a~ 

ai& for the extelulon and Imp mnt of Its oaapu~ knd tar the 

equipwnt of the tmlldw thereon one-th$rd oi tbts Avallablo 

Unlrsrsltp Fund reoolnd froa~the POmUW%C Unirstsltf ?uad 

arlalng iron the aim rfllloli aore of land appropriated by the 

Oonstltutlon or 1076 and the land l ppropeated by the Aat8 of 

185 axoept lnoow frem graslag leases on Unlversltf land, and 

prorides that the Board of Dlreotor8 rat plodge their part ot 

the arallable r-8 for not'exodediag flftaen years to maIce 

said funds lmmedlately available. 

The above statutes aaka prariolo~ for the purohan 

of such equipment oat of thq Mailable Dalter8ity Faad. &orever, we Slnd no qmqlflo proklmlon that wuld prerent the 

Legi8latlw, ii It eo de81~3, from approptlating addltlonal 

money out OS the Oeneral Eetenuo,M Sor the parpoee oi 

equlpplng said bulldlags insotar a8 suoh equlprsnt does mt 

oonstlttzte perman~nt~rlstures. 

'Hoping that thls anmrers~~eur queatlon, wa am 

DDM:FL 

-D. D. Mahon 

Aasietknt 

APPROVED:
Alex Nelson

Prometheus Computing, LLC 

University of California, Santa Cruz

Enumerating and Analyzing Storage 

Data with Digital Forensics XML
❖Contractor at NIST

• Working with NSRL team

❖UC Santa Cruz Ph.D. Candidate

• Thesis title:

Software signature derivation from sequential digital forensic analysis

❖Here because of work with Digital Forensics XML

Who I am

2
❖Originally by Dr. Simson Garfinkel

• One of the goals:

Analyze storage without needing the storage image

❖Language to describe files, file systems, and partitioning systems

• All inode (/MFT entry) metadata

• File content checksums

• Location metadata

• Generating-process provenance

• Generic enough for any file system

❖Schema available

• Documents elements

• Validates DFXML documents with xmllint

Digital Forensics XML

3
❖C bindings (by Garfinkel)

• Library for writing DFXML documents

❖Original Python bindings, dfxml.py (by Garfinkel)

• Read-only objects

• SAX processing with callback functions

❖Objects.py bindings (by Nelson)

• Read-write objects

• xml.etree (SAX-like) processing with loops and iterparse()

DFXML language bindings

4
❖File system differencing

• Based on DFXML software

• On second differencing algorithm version

❖Differencing research:

• Changes between file system states

[Garfinkel, DFRWS 2012]

• Two metadata manifests in, differences out

• Discrepancies in tool reports

[Nelson, DFRWS 2014]

• Registry effects measurements

(Ongoing)

DFXML research background

5
❖Implemented:

• iredact.py (Garfinkel, Woods) – Redact disk image

• Improvements on BitCurator development agenda

• UPartsFS (Nelson) – Disk partitions as big virtual files

• FUSE file system

• (Not actually DFXML-based, but helps with tool analysis)

❖To implement:

• DFXMLFS.py – Treat DFXML file like a regular file system

• FUSE file system, in Python

• Parsers for old file systems (?)

• ?

DFXML-based projects

6
❖DFXML Library:

https://github.com/simsong/dfxml

❖DFXML Schema:

https://github.com/dfxml-working-group/dfxml_schema

❖Diskprint workflow:

https://github.com/ajnelson/diskprint_workflow

❖Garfinkel, DFRWS 2012:

http://dfrws.org/2012/proceedings/DFRWS2012-6.pdf

❖Nelson, DFRWS 2014:

http://dfrws.org/2014/proceedings/DFRWS2014-6.pdf

References

7
#### HEATON *v.*THE STATE.

No. 6217.

September 22, 1928.

*148
      *John S. Edwards*and *S. Holderness,*for plaintiff in error.

*S. W. Ragsdale,*solicitor-general, and *E. S. Aull,*contra.

Per Curiam.

1. “The judges of the superior courts, at the close of each term, in open court, shall unlock the box, and break the seal, and cause to be drawn from apartment number *‘*one not less than eighteen nor more than thirty names to serve as grand jurors at the next term of court; all of which names shall be deposited in apartment number e two; ’ and when all the names shall have been drawn out of apartment number ‘ one, ’ then the drawing shall commence from apartment number c two, ’ and the tickets be returned to number c one, ’ and so on alternately; and no name so deposited in the box shall, on any pretense whatever, be thrown out of it, or destroyed, except when it is satisfactorily shown to the judge that the juror is dead, removed out of the county, or otherwise disqualified by law.” Penal Code (1910), § 823. The language, “or otherwise disqualified by law,” means a disqualification which renders it improper to put the name of a person in the grand-jury box, and not a disqualification propter affectum.

2. A grand jury should be drawn from the whole body of citizens selected and placed in the grand-jury box indifferently and without discrimination, under the above section of the Penal Code.

3. When a grand jury is so drawn to serve, and it develops that a number of its members are disqualified to serve in the investigation of an alleged charge against the defendant, and the judge undertakes to supply their places by drawing other grand jurors from the grand-jury box, such drawing shall be made indifferently and without discrimination as above stated. In drawing such jurors a trial judge is not authorized by law, upon information based in part on what he knows, and derived in part from others, to reject jurors so drawn upon the ground that they would be incompetent propter affectum to indict the person against whom a charge is preferred and is to be passed upon by the grand jury. *White*v. *State,*166 *Ga.*192 (142 S. E. 666).

4. Where a grand jury so drawn returned an indictment against a defendant, and the defendant filed a plea in abatement raising the above objection to the manner in which such grand jury was drawn, such plea was good, and the trial judge erred in directing a verdict -against such plea, and the Court of Appeals erred in affirming that ruling of the trial judge.

*1495. For the above reasons we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals; and this renders it unnecessary for us to consider any of the other assignments of error in the record, because, when the trial judge improperly directed a verdict against the plea in abatement, all that took place subsequently thereto was nugatory.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur, Hill and Gilbert, JJ., specially.*
9833.

#### Campbell *v.*Hutcheson.

Decided November 23, 1918.

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court—Judge Bell. March 29, 1918.

*Payne & Jones,*for plaintiff in error. .

*John R. Burress, co*ntra.,

Broyles, P. J.

1. Failure to file a claim, under the provisions of the Revised Statutes of the United States, § 3460 (U. S. Comp. St. 1916, § 6362), to property seized by the collector of internal revenue for a violation of the revenue laws will not estop the true owner from asserting his title by an action of trover brought against the purchaser of the property at a sale held by the collector of .internal revenue; provided he has done nothing to mislead the purchaser as to his relation to the property and the title. *McLennan*v. *Graham,*106 *Ga.*211 (32 S. E. 118), and cases there cited; *Lawless*v. *Orr,*122 *Ga.*276 (50 S. E. 85).

*(a)*In the instant case the evidence authorized a finding by the. judge of the municipal court of Atlanta, exercising the functions of both judge and jury, that the owner of the property was not present when it was sold by the collector of internal revenue, and that he had done nothing, before or at the sale, to mislead the purchaser as to the owner’s true relation to the property and the title.

2, The constitutional question argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error was not raised in the petition for certiorari, and accordingly the case will not be transferred to the Supreme Court.

3. It does not appear that the judge of the superior, court erred' in overruling the certiorari.

*Judgment affirmed,.*

*Bloodworth, J., concurs. Stephens, J., not presiding.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE FORM 10Q FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 FOR AETNA LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY COMPANY
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000837010
<NAME> AETNA LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            12,573
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                         222
<MORTGAGE>                                          13
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  13,206
<CASH>                                             422
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                  11
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           1,469
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,107
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                  3,584
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  1
<POLICY-OTHER>                                      27
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           10,414
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,575
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,107
<PREMIUMS>                                          46
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                772
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                  17
<OTHER-INCOME>                                      35
<BENEFITS>                                         666
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    122
<INCOME-TAX>                                        32
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 90
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        90
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-5075 MICHAEL KAWA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in 06-CV-448, Judge George W. Miller. ON MOTION Before NEWMAN 

### Circuit Judge. ORDER Michael Kawa moves without opposition to stay the briefing schedule pending the United States Court of Federal Claims's disposition of Kawa's Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to vacate the judgment. We grant Kawa's motion. If the trial court intends to grant the motion, it should so inform the parties and the parties may then promptly move this court to remand the case. The trial court may deny the motion without a remand by this court. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. The briefing schedule is stayed. If no action is taken by the trial court within 45 days of the date of filing of this order, the parties should file a status report with this court.

### FOR THE COURT



# MAY 2 9 2009 /s/ Jan Horbalv Date Jan Horbaly Clerk PILE

U.S. COURT 

### FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT cc: Joseph A. Camardo, Jr., Esq. Leslie Cayer Ohta, Esq. s19 MAY 2 9 2009 

### JAN HURIJALY CLERK

2009-5075 2