alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
VCAT meeting

EXIT

Cafeteria

Courtyard

M W

Employee 

lounge

VC

You are here pho
VCAT Agenda Review, February 3 VCAT Agenda Review, February 3

-4

Tuesday

•NIST Deputy Director NIST Deputy Director’s Update s Update• 

• Planning at NIST Planning at NIST

• 

• Process Wrapped in Culture Leads PRO Process Wrapped in Culture Leads PRO

-TEC

Performance Excellence and Innovation Performance Excellence and Innovation

•Laboratory Tours Laboratory Tours

•Center for Center for Nanoscale Nanoscale Science and Tech

Science and Tech

NanoFab NanoFab: A National Facility for : A National Facility for Nanosc

Nanosc

Measurement Measurement

• 

• Measurements and Standards for Detec

Measurements and Standards for Detec

Explosives Explosives

•NIST’sRole in Ensuring Accurate Clima

Role in Ensuring Accurate Clima

• 

• Annual Report Preparation and Discussion Annual Report Preparation and Discussion

Wednesday Wednesday

• 

• Continue Annual Report Preparation and Dis

Continue Annual Report Preparation and Dis
Appreciation: Appreciation: Exiting Exiting VCAT Membe

VCAT Membe

LOU ANN HEIMBROOK LOU ANN HEIMBROOK

Term: March 6, 2003 Term: March 6, 2003 –March 5, 2009 March 5, 2009Contributions include: Contributions include:• Member of VCAT Bioscience/Health

Member of VCAT Bioscience/Health

• Assistance in Framing Assistance in Framing NIST’sBiosci

Biosci

ROBERT WILLIAMS ROBERT WILLIAMS

Term: April 1, 2003 Term: April 1, 2003 –March 5, 2009 March 5, 2009

Contributions include: Contributions include:

• Member of VCAT Nanotechnology Subcommittee Member of VCAT Nanotechnology Subcommittee•VCAT Panel on Management of Organizati VCAT Panel on Management of Organizations with ons with 

Remote Sites Remote Sites•VCAT Panel on How to Maximize NIST Impact on VCAT Panel on How to Maximize NIST Impact on U.S. Innovation U.S. Innovation•Advice on NIST Advice on NIST’s Role in Manufacturing in a Global s Role in Manufacturing in a Global 

Economy Economy
9837.

#### Dodge *v.*Royal Mining and Milling Company.

Luke, J.

The grounds of the motion for a new trial which have the approval of the trial judge do not show material error in the admission *200of testimony. -The charge of the court is subject to some slight criticism, because of inapt expressions, but upon the whole was full and submitted the issues to the jury, and could not have misled them in such a way as to work injury to the plaintiff. The evidence, though conflicting, authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial jud'ge. ■ There is no error or harm shown to the plaintiff by reason of the ruling,s upon the demurrers to the answer of the defendant. Eor none Of the reasons assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Decided January 14, 1919.

Complaint; from I-Iaralson superior court—Judge Bartlett. April 15, 1918.

*Griffith & Matthews, Hutchens & McBride,*for plaintiff.

*Price Edwards, Lloyd Thomas,*for defendant.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Wade, *C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.*
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of BLACKWATER MIDSTREAM CORP. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K/A for the year ended MARCH 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald St.Pierre,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  July
      2, 2009
                
                By:
      /S/ DONALD
      ST.PIERRE
                Donald
      St.Pierre
                Chief
      Financial Officer
IB 

Union Calendar No. 311 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4158 

[Report No. 108–537] 

To provide for the conveyance to the Government of Mexico of a decommissioned National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ship, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2004 

Mr. ORTIZ (for himself, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mr. REYES, Mr. 

RODRIGUEZ, and Mr. GREEN of Texas) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

JUNE 9, 2004 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To provide for the conveyance to the Government of Mexico 

of a decommissioned National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration ship, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4158 RH 

1 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF NOAA VESSEL WHITING. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Commerce shall 

3 convey to the Government of Mexico, without consider4 ation, all right, title, and interest of the United States in 

5 and to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administra6 tion vessel WHITING— 

7 (1) for use as a hydrographic survey platform 

8 in support of activities of the United States-Mexico 

9 Charting Advisors Committee; and 

10 (2) to enhance coordination and cooperation be11 tween the United States and Mexico regarding hy12 drographic surveying and nautical charting activities 

13 in the border waters of both countries in the Gulf 

14 of Mexico and in the Pacific Ocean. 

15 (b) OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.—The Govern16 ment of the United States shall not be responsible or liable 

17 for any remediation, maintenance, or operation of a vessel 

18 conveyed under this section after the date of the delivery 

19 of the vessel to the Government of Mexico. 

20 (c) DEADLINE.—The Secretary shall seek to complete 

21 the conveyance by as soon as practicable after the date 

22 of the enactment of this Act. 

23 (d) DELIVERY OF VESSEL.—The Secretary shall de24 liver the vessel WHITING pursuant to this section at the 

25 vessel’s homeport location of Norfolk, Virginia, at no addi26 tional cost to the United States. 

Union Calendar No. 311 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4158 

[Report No. 108–537] 

A BILL 

To provide for the conveyance to the Government 

other purposes. and Atmospheric Administration ship, and for of Mexico of a decommissioned National Oceanic 

JUNE 9, 2004 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION

WAYNE FARMS LLC ) Civil Action No.: 20-5191

 )

Plaintiff, ) Judge Valdez

v. )

 ) Magistrate Judge ___________

JOHN DOE AND , )

LINKEDIN CORPORATION )

 )

Defendants )

 )

LOCAL RULE 3.2

NOTICE OF AFFILIATES

Pursuant to Local Rule LR 3.4, Plaintiff provides the following information to be used by 

the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois as 

required by 15 U.S.C. Section 1116(c):

A. Names and addresses of the parties:

Plaintiff:

Wayne Farms LLC

(Delaware Limited Liability Company)

4110 Continental Drive

Oakwood, GA 30566

Defendants:

John Doe

Address Unknown

LinkedIn Corporation

1000 West Maude Avenue

Sunnyvale, CA 94085

B. U.S. Federal Trademark Registrations Pleaded in the Complaint:

Trademark Reg # Drawing

Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 5 Filed: 09/02/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:59
2

WAYNE FARMS 

and BARN, SILO 

and TREE 

DESIGN

4371372

WAYNE FARMS 

and BARN, SILO 

and TREE 

DESIGN with 

CHINESE "big, 

powerful, healthy, 

earth"

4683867

WAYNE FARMS 980466 WAYNE FARMS

Respectfully submitted,

Date: September 2, 2020 By:

David C. Brezina (ID3121581)

Ladas & Parry LLP

224 S Michigan Ave, #1600

Chicago, IL 60604

(312) 427-1300

dbrezina@ladas.net

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Wayne Farms LLC

Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 5 Filed: 09/02/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:60
#### LAURENT v. USAIR, INC.

No. 468P96

Case below: 124 N.C.App. 208

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 May 1997.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 404

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to provide penalties for open air 

drug markets, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2003

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to provide penalties 

for open air drug markets, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Open Air Drug Market 

5 Penalty Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PENALTIES FOR OPEN AIR DRUG MARKETS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part D of the Controlled Sub8 stances Act (21 U.S.C. 841 et seq.) is amended by adding 

9 at the end the following: 
2

•HR 404 IH 

1 ‘‘OPEN AIR DRUG MARKETS

2 ‘‘SEC. 423. (a) Whoever commits a specified Federal 

3 drug offense, knowing that at least one other has com4 mitted a specified Federal drug offense—

5 ‘‘(1) within 500 feet of the place the offense 

6 under this section takes place; and 

7 ‘‘(2) within a 48-hour period; 

8 shall, in addition to any penalty imposed for the specified 

9 Federal drug offense, be imprisoned 5 years. 

10 ‘‘(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 

11 court shall not place on probation or suspend the sentence 

12 of any person convicted for a violation of this section, nor 

13 shall the term of imprisonment imposed under this sub14 section run concurrently with any other term of imprison15 ment, including that imposed for the specified Federal 

16 drug offense. 

17 ‘‘(c) As used in this section, the term ‘specified Fed18 eral drug offense’ means a Federal offense—

19 ‘‘(1) of which an element is the distribution or 

20 attempted distribution of a controlled substance; and 

21 ‘‘(2) for which the maximum term of imprison22 ment that may be imposed equals or exceeds 5 

23 years.’’. 

24 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

25 for title II of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention 
3

•HR 404 IH 

1 and Control Act of 1970 is amended by inserting after 

2 the item relating to section 422 the following new item:

‘‘Sec. 423. Open air drug markets.’’.

Æ
#### STATE v. BOYD

No. 242P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 226

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 23 July 1997. Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 23 July 1997.
Amendment No. 1 to the Hibernia Corporation 2005 Deferred Award Plan



 Exhibit 10.90 
  
 HIBERNIA CORPORATION 
 2005 DEFERRED AWARD PLAN 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
  
 THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the Hibernia Corporation
2005 Deferred Award Plan (the “Plan”) is made as of the 26th day of October 2005. 
  
 WHEREAS, Hibernia Corporation, a Corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Louisiana (the “Company”), maintains the Plan, which was adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company
(the “Board”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, under the terms of the
Plan, the Board has the authority to amend the Plan; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Board approved the following amendment to the Plan on October 26, 2005; 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises set forth above, and effective as of the date first above written, the Plan shall be and hereby is
amended as follows: 
  
 1. Section 4.4 of the Plan is hereby
amended by deleting the reference therein to “September 30, 2006” and substituting in its place the words “December 31, 2006”. 
  
 2. On and after the date hereof, each reference in the Plan to “this Plan,” “hereunder,” “herein” or words of like import
shall mean and be a reference to the Plan as amended hereby. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Committee has caused this Amendment No. 1 to be executed as of the month, day and year first above written. 
  

			
	HIBERNIA CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ J. Herbert Boydstun


	 	 	J. Herbert Boydstun
	 	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4248

AN ACT

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the

authorization of appropriations for the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to make grants to existing comprehensive

service programs for homeless veterans, and for other

purposes.
2

•HR 4248 EH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Homeless Veterans As5 sistance Act of 2004’’.

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIA7 TIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005.

8 Section 2013 of title 38, United States Code, is

9 amended by striking ‘‘$75,000,000’’ in paragraph (4) and

10 inserting ‘‘$99,000,000’’.

11 SEC. 3. PERMANENT AUTHORITY FOR SECRETARY OF VET12 ERANS AFFAIRS TO OPERATE SEXUAL TRAU13 MA COUNSELING PROGRAM.

14 Section 1720D(a) of title 38, United States Code, is

15 amended—

16 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘During the

17 period through December 31, 2004, the’’ and insert18 ing ‘‘The’’; and

19 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘, during the

20 period through December 31, 2004,’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 7 (legislative day, October 6), 2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4248

AN ACT

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase

less veterans, and for other purposes.isting comprehensive service programs for homeretary of Veterans Affairs to make grants to exthe authorization of appropriations for the Sec-
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
EFTC Corporation:

We consent to the inclusion herein of our report dated May 1, 1998, relating to
the consolidated balance sheets of EFTC Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 1997, and incorporation by reference herein
of our report dated January 21, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of EFTC Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1997 (which report is no longer applicable), which report appears in the
December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of EFTC Corporation, and to the
references to our firm under the headings "Summary Consolidated Historical
Financial Information", "Selected Consolidated Historical Financial Data", and
"Experts" in the Prospectus.


                                   /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
                                   KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Denver, Colorado
May 7, 1998
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sherman Shelby SHAW and George M. Snellings, III, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 79-2022, 79-2901.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 8, 1980.

Rehearing Denied May 23,1980.

Charles C. Trascher, III, Monroe, La., for defendants-appellants in both cases.

Dosite H. Perkins, Ansel M. Stroud, III, Asst. U. S. Attys., Shreveport, La., for plaintiff-appellee in both cases.

Before TUTTLE, AINSWORTH and SAM D. JOHNSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This case comes before us on appeals from two separate orders of the dis*252trict court for the Western District of Louisiana, the Monroe Division. The appeals, which have been consolidated for hearing before this Court, involve two pending criminal cases arising out of the defendants’ alleged violations of the federal migratory bird laws, 16 U.S.C. § 703*et seq.*In the appeal numbered 79-2022, we affirm the district court’s order on the basis of its opinion, *see United States v. Shaw,*467 F.Supp. 86 (W.D.La.1979). As to appeal No. 79-2901, we reverse. Although we agree that the prosecution’s actions do not constitute a violation of the double jeopardy prohibition of the Fifth Amendment, we hold that the filing of the second information occurred under circumstances which indicate that the filing constitutes vindictive prosecution for the particular acts of the defendants described in No. 79-2022. A criminal defendant is entitled to pursue statutory or procedural rights without the fear of vindictive retaliation. *See Blackledge*v. *Perry,*417 U.S. 21, 28, 94 S.Ct. 2098, 2102, 40 L.Ed.2d 628 (1974).

The judgment in 79-2022 is AFFIRMED. The judgment in 79-2901 is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the trial court with directions that the prosecution be dismissed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


[X] Please mark your  
    votes as in this  
    example.          
    



Approval of the Merger.

   FOR         AGAINST        ABSTAIN

  [  ]           [  ]           [  ]



SIGNATURE(S)                                      DATE           
            -------------------------------------      ----------

NOTE: (Joint owners must EACH sign. Please sign EXACTLY as your name(s)
appear(s) on this card. When signing as attorney, trustee, executor,
administrator, guardian or corporate officer, please give your FULL title.)

PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND MAIL TODAY.


                             THE CERPLEX GROUP, INC.

 BOARD OF DIRECTORS PROXY FOR THE SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD AT
                     11:00 A.M., TUESDAY, APRIL 23, 1998 AT
             THE CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS OF THE CERPLEX GROUP, INC.,
                   1382 BELL AVENUE, TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92780


                  The undersigned stockholder of The Cerplex Group, Inc. (the
"Company") hereby appoints Stephen J. Hopkins, as proxy, with full power of
substitution, to vote the shares of the undersigned at the above-stated Special
Meeting and at any adjournment(s) thereof on the proposals set forth on the
reverse side.

                  THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AND WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS MADE ON THE REVERSE
SIDE. IF A CHOICE IS NOT INDICATED WITH RESPECT TO THE MATTER REFERRED TO
THEREIN, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED "FOR" SUCH MATTER. THIS PROXY IS REVOCABLE AT
ANY TIME BEFORE IT IS EXERCISED.

                  Receipt herewith of the Company's Notice of Meeting and Joint
Proxy Statement/Prospectus, dated March 27, 1998, is hereby acknowledged.

                                                                   ============
                                                                    SEE REVERSE
                                                                       SIDE
                                                                   ============
EX-10.3



 





Exhibit 10.3




AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE

ASSURANT, INC.

2004 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN




     THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 (this “Amendment”) to the Assurant, Inc. 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan,
as amended, (the “Plan”) is made this 10th day of November, 2005.



     The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Assurant, Inc. (the “Company”) has
determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to amend the
definition of the term “Disability” to reflect the original intent of the Committee as to the
meaning and effect of that term.



     1. The Plan is hereby amended by deleting the first sentence of the definition of “Retirement” in
Section 2.1 of the Plan in its entirety and by substituting in lieu thereof the following:




“(k) “Disability” or “Disabled” means, for purposes of the Plan, a Participant’s
termination of employment with the Company or an Affiliate as a result of a determination
that the Participant is “disabled” or has a “disability,” as such terms are defined in the
long-term disability plan or policy maintained by the Company or, if applicable, most
recently maintained, by the Company or if applicable, an Affiliate, for the Participant,
whether or not such Participant actually receives disability benefits under such plan or
policy.”



     Except as expressly amended hereby, the terms of the Plan, as previously amended, shall be and
remain unchanged and the Plan as amended hereby shall remain in full force and effect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly
authorized representative on the day and year first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	ASSURANT, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	
 	 
	 	 	Robert Haertel 	 
	 	 	Senior Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
KOGER EQUITY DOES NOT FILE A CLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET, THEREFORE THESE NOT
PROVIDED. 5-02 (9), 5-02 (21)
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          29,701
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,885
<ALLOWANCES>                                       361
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         604,062
<DEPRECIATION>                                  67,623
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 580,812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        253,993
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           205
<OTHER-SE>                                     314,298
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   580,812
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,175
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,215
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,905
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,962
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,093
<INCOME-TAX>                                        77
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,016
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,016
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        

</TABLE>