alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                       EXHIBIT 5




July 22, 1998



Medical Alliance, Inc.
2445 Gateway Drive, Suite 150
Irving, Texas  75063

         Re:     Registration Statement on Form S-8 of Medical Alliance, Inc.

Gentlemen:

We are acting as counsel for Medical Alliance, Inc., a Texas corporation (the
"Company"), in connection with the registration under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the "Act"), of the offering and sale of up to 300,000 shares
of the Company's Common Stock, par value $0.02 per share (the "Shares"), in
respect of the Company's Amended and Restated 1994 Long-Term Incentive Plan
(the "Plan").  A Registration Statement on Form S-8 covering the offering and
sale of the Shares (the "Registration Statement") is expected to be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on or about the date
hereof.

         In reaching the conclusions expressed in this opinion, we have
examined and relied upon the originals or certified copies of all documents,
certificates, and instruments as we have deemed necessary to the opinions
expressed herein, including the Restated and Amended Articles of Incorporation,
the Restated and Amended Bylaws of the Company, and a copy of the Plan.  In
making the foregoing examinations, we have assumed the genuineness of all
signatures on original documents, the authenticity of all documents submitted
to us as originals and the conformity to original documents of all copies
submitted to us.

         Based solely upon the foregoing, subject to the comments hereinafter
stated, and limited in all respects to the laws of the State of Texas, and the
federal laws of the United States of America, it is our opinion that the
Shares, when issued by the Company in respect of the Plan, will be validly
issued, fully paid, and nonassessable.
<PAGE>   2
Medical Alliance, Inc.
July 22, 1998
Page 2



         We hereby consent to the use of this opinion as Exhibit 5 to the
Registration Statement.  In giving this consent, we do not admit that we come
within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the
Act or the rules and regulations of the Commission promulgated thereunder.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        /s/ Jackson Walker L.L.P.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

ABC CORPORATION I, 

ABC CORPORATION II, 

Plaintiffs,

v. 

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND 

UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS 

IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:20-cv-4806

Judge Thomas M. Durkin

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole

DECLARATION OF CHANDLER E. STURM

I, Chandler E. Sturm, hereby declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney at Tarter, Krinsky & Drogin LLP, counsel of record for Plaintiffs

Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. (“Chic”) and Unicorn Global, Inc. (“Unicorn”, 

and collectively with Chic, “Plaintiffs”).

2. I make this Declaration in support of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion 

for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement. 

3. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the transcript of the 

October 26, 2022 deposition of Jim Gandy taken in this action.

4. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of excepts of the transcript 

of the December 2, 2022 preliminary injunction hearing in this action.

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 671 Filed: 09/29/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:17254
2

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the

foregoing is true and correct.

Dated: January 25, 2023 By: ______________________________

New York, New York Chandler E. Sturm 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 671 Filed: 09/29/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:17255
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1516

JOHN MICHAEL WOLFE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MARK R. HERRING, Attorney General, Commonwealth of Virginia,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, Senior District Judge. (1:20-cv-00189-LO-JFA)

Submitted: September 9, 2021 Decided: September 13, 2021

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Michael Wolfe, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

John Michael Wolfe appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.*

 

Wolfe v. Herring, No. 1:20-cv-00189-LO-JFA (E.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2021). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

* Because the district court’s dismissal was for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, 

we modify the district court’s order to clarify that the dismissal is without prejudice. See 

S. Walk at Broadlands Homeowner’s Ass’n v. OpenBand at Broadlands, LLC, 713 F.3d 

175, 185 (4th Cir. 2013) (“A dismissal for . . . [a] defect in subject matter jurisdiction[] 

must be one without prejudice, because a court that lacks jurisdiction has no power to 

adjudicate and dispose of a claim on the merits.”).
Exhibit  32.1



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DIMENSIONAL VISIONS INCORPORATED (the
"Company")  on Form 10QSB for the period ended  December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Preston J. Shea, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Preston J. Shea
--------------------------------------
Preston J. Shea
President and Chief Accounting Officer



March 3, 2006
Rev. 0330017 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

219 SOUTH DEARBORN STREET 

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604 

REGISTRY DEPOSIT INFORMATION 

FORM 

Instructions: Complete this form and e-file it as an exhibit to your motion for leave to 

deposit money in the court. 

Yes No 

1. Case Number:

2. Case Title:

3. Judge:

4. Moving Party:

5. Amount of Deposit:

6. Are the funds being deposited as interpleader funds pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1335?

(Funds deposited as interpleader funds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1335 are subject to mandatory management fees and mandatory tax

withholdings. Failure to properly identify interpleader funds prior

to depositing them with the Clerk’s Office will result in delayed

disbursement.)

I declare under penalty of perjury that the above information is true and correct. Under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1335, this statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made

under oath.

_____________________________________________ ____________________________ 

Attorney or Litigant Date 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 726 Filed: 08/23/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:18358
10246, 10247.

#### Richie *v.*Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company; and *vice versa.*

Decided May 16, 1919.

Action for damages; from city court of Cartersville—Judge Aubrey. October 12, 1918.

*A. W. Fite, J. R. Whitaker, R. R. Arnold,*for plaintiff.

*D. W. Blair, Neel, Finley & Neel,*for defendant.

Luke, J.

It appears to be conclusively settled that, notwithstanding the return of a second verdict in favor of the same party, the trial judge may still exercise his discretion in granting or refusing a new trial, though that discretion may not then be as ample as on the hearing of the motion for a first new trial *(Morgan*v. *Lamb,*16 *Ga. App.*484, and cases there cited, 85 S. E. 792) ; and under the particular, facts of the instant case the second grant of a new trial was not an abuse of the discretion vested in the trial judge.

*Judgment affirmed on both bills of exceptions.*

*Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., conewr.*
#### Hines & Thomas *v.*S. M. Helm.

New Trial — Newly Discovered Evidence.

A new trial can not be granted because of newly discovered evidence which, could have been discovered and used on the trial by the exercise of reasonable diligence.

APPEAL FROM WARREN' CIRCUIT COURT.

December 19, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

The evidence discovered after the trial was to’ the very point in issue on which appellants had adduced evidence and made their defense, and the rule in such cases is that new trials for discovery of parol evidence to the facts in issue and to which evidence had been offered on the trial should be seldom granted, even<(where there had been diligence in preparing the defense. In this case, Thomas, one of the partners and a defendant, knew that Baker was engaged by the firm' to haul the wheat and that he would prove the facts which he stated he would prove, and he failed to have him summoned or to give Hines the information. Nor does it appear that Hines was absent and could not have known what Baker would prove by even slight attention to the business. They have not man*232ifested reasonable diligence in the preparation of their defense and the judgment must be *affirmed.*

*W. Underwood, for appellants.*

*Rodes & Clark, for appellee.*
Amendment No. 1 to 2005 Stock Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 Amendment No. 1 to Bronco Drilling Company, Inc. 
 2005 Stock Incentive Plan 
  
 The Bronco Drilling Company, Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
  
 1.         Amendment. 
  
 Delete Section 4.1 and replace it, in its entirety, with the following: 
  
 “4.1 Share Reserve. Subject to the provisions of Section 11.1 relating to adjustments upon changes in
Common Stock, the shares that may be issued pursuant to Awards shall consist of the Company’s authorized but unissued Common Stock, and the maximum aggregate amount of such Common Stock which may be issued upon exercise of all Awards under the
Plan, including Incentive Stock Options, shall not exceed One Million (1,000,000) shares. Awards for fractional shares of Common Stock may not be issued under the terms of the Plan.” 
  
 2.         Execution. To record the adoption
of the Amendment by the Board, the Company has caused its authorized officer to execute the Amendment as of the date specified below. 
  
 [Signature Page Follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, upon authorization of the Board of Directors, the undersigned has caused Amendment
No. 1 to the Bronco Drilling Company, Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan to be executed effective as of the 16th
day of November, 2005. 
  

			
	Bronco Drilling Company, Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ D. Frank Harrison

	 	 	D. Frank Harrison
	 	 	Chief Executive Officer


  

 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mercari Communications Group, Ltd. on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, L. Michael Underwood, President/Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ L. Michael UnderwoodL. Michael UnderwoodPresident(Principal Executive Officer)

September 24, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                       EXHIBIT 5

                        [WHITE & CASE LLP LETTERHEAD]


July 15, 1998


Newmont Gold Company
1700 Lincoln Street
Denver, Colorado 80203


Dear Sirs:

                  We have examined the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (the
"Registration Statement") under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act"), in the form in which it is to be filed today by Newmont Gold
Company, a Delaware corporation ("Newmont"), with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Commission"), relating to up to $250,000,000 aggregate
principal amount of Newmont's debt securities consisting of debentures, notes or
other unsecured evidences of indebtedness (the "Securities") to be issued from
time to time pursuant to the terms of an Indenture between Newmont and Citibank,
N.A., as Trustee, filed as Exhibit 4 to the Registration Statement (the
"Indenture"), and to be sold to or through underwriters, to other purchasers or
through agents.

                  Based upon our examination of such documents, certificates,
records, authorizations and proceedings as we have deemed relevant, it is our
opinion that, when (i) execution of the Indenture has been duly authorized by
Newmont by appropriate corporate action, (ii) the issuance of the Securities and
the approval of final terms thereof have been duly authorized by appropriate
corporate action, (iii) the Indenture has been duly executed and delivered by
Newmont, (iv) the Securities have been duly executed and authenticated, and (v)
the Securities have been delivered against payment therefor, the Securities will
be valid and legally binding obligations of Newmont enforceable in accordance
with their terms, except as the enforceability thereof may be limited by
bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or other similar laws affecting the
enforcement of creditors' rights generally and by general equitable principles
regardless of whether the issue of enforceability is considered in a proceeding
in equity or at law.


<PAGE>   2
Newmont Gold Company
Page 2


                  We consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement and to the reference to our firm appearing under the
caption "Validity of Debt Securities" in the Prospectus forming part of the
Registration Statement. In giving this consent, we do not hereby admit that we
are within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of
the Securities Act or the rules and regulations of the Commission thereunder.

                                   Sincerely,



                                   /s/ White & Case LLP
MSB:JMC
----

----

----

----

----

|                         |   | /s/      William C. Leone |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                         |   | William      C. Leone     |
|                         |   | President                 |
|                         |   |                      |
| (Corporate      Seal)        |   |                      |
|                         |   |                      |
| Attest:                      |   |                      |
|                         |   |                      |
| /s/      Signature illegible |   |                      |
| Assistant      Secretary     |   |                      |

----
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70166-70167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27769]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XD616


Western Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Western Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) will 
hold a meeting in Hawaii in December 2014 regarding social science in 
the fishery management council process.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, December 17, 2014, Thursday, 
December 18, 2014, and Friday, December 19, 2014 from 8:30 a.m. to 5 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place at the Council office, 1164 
Bishop Street, Suite 1400, Honolulu, HI; telephone: (808) 522-8220. 
Site visits for meeting participants to points of interest on the 
Fishing Community of Oahu will be conducted on Friday, December 19, 
2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kitty M. Simonds, Executive Director; 
telephone: (808) 522-8220.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The order in which agenda items are 
addressed may change. The meetings will run as late as necessary to 
complete scheduled business.

[[Page 70167]]

Schedule and Agenda for Meeting

8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. Wednesday, December 17, 2014

1. Welcome
2. Introductions
3. Workshop overview
4. Addressing Federal Regulations I
5. Addressing Federal Regulations II

8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. Thursday, December 18, 2014

6. Social Impact Assessment: Regional Approaches
7. Data Collection I (Methods)
8. Data Collection II (Indicators)
9. Data Analysis and Social Impact Assessment Writing
10. Social Impact Assessment: Predictions vs. Actual
11. Next Steps

8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. Friday, December 19, 2014

1. Oahu Fishing Community Site Visits

Special Accommodations

    These meetings are physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other 
auxiliary aids should be directed to Kitty M. Simonds, (808) 522-8220 
(voice) or (808) 522-8226 (fax), at least 5 days prior to the meeting 
date.

    Authority:  16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: November 19, 2014.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-27769 Filed 11-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00860-CR

EX PARTE Donald Curtis BRASSFIELD

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-1899-CR-A

Honorable Jessica Crawford, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, appellant’s motion to dismiss is 

GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED January 30, 2019.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's financial statements for the year ended February 28, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          768,912
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (818,912)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.000


</TABLE>
Description

Problem

There needs to be a Josephson voltage 

standard (JVS) with multiple independent 

simultaneous voltage outputs. It needs to 

provide two or more voltage references that 

are generated simultaneously from the 

instrument. This concept would circumvent 

the need for two or multiple systems for 

applications that require fixed or variable 

voltage ratios, or dual signals.

Invention

It was determined that a device having 

simultaneous voltage reference signals 

would be useful for many measurement 

and calibration activities. A JVS 

advantageously having multiple output 

leads would meet this criterion, and 

provide such voltage references without 

the need for multiple systems. Therefore,

this invention is not limited to only two 

independent voltage outputs but can be 

generalized to any number of voltage 

outputs as required by the application. The 

implementation encompasses either a 

single chip design with multiple voltage 

taps or the use of multiple independent 

circuits/devices located within a single 

cryogenic vessel. The output voltages can 

be of fixed ratio, independently 

programmable, or frequency/phase locked 

for ac, power, and impedance applications. 

Benefits

Competitive Advantage

Simplifies by at least a factor of two the 

complexity of JVS systems when a 

voltage ratio is needed

Avoids the need to duplicate JVS 

systems if more than one voltage 

output is required for an application, 

thus reducing the complexity and the 

costs

Provides self-calibration capabilities by 

use of simultaneous voltage outputs

Commercial Application

Generation of simultaneous voltage 

references

Ratio and phase standard calibrations 

Reference voltage with arbitrary phase 

and amplitude for electric power standard 

calibration

Impedance ratio measurement 

Josephson Voltage Standard

Patent 11,557,708

Reference No. 19-035US1

Technology Partnership Office

tpo@nist.gov

An automated comparison measurement between 

two PJVS systems using an analog nanovoltmeter