alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NIST Handbook 133 

Checking the Net Contents 

of Packaged Goods 

as adopted by the 87th National Conference on Weights and Measures 2002 

Editors: 

Tom Coleman 

Terry L. Grimes 

Henry V. Oppermann, Chief 

NIST Weights and Measures 

Division 

Gaithersburg, MD 20899-2600 

U.S. Department of Commerce 

Donald L. Evans, Secretary 

Technology Administration 

 Phillip J. Bond, Under Secretary 

of Commerce for Technology 

National Institute of 

Standards and Technology 

Arden L. Bement, Jr., Director 

NIST Handbook 133 
Fourth Edition 2003 

(Issued November 2002) 

(Supercedes NIST Handbook 133, Third Edition, 1998; Supplement 1, 1990; 

Supplement 2, 1991; Supplement 3, 1992; Supplement 4, 1994; 

and the Fourth Edition January 2002) 

December 2002
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 226 (Monday, November 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 69866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27669]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel Production, Analysis, and Distribution of Cannabis 
and Related Materials (7793).
    Date: December 2, 2014.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Lyle Furr, Scientific Review Officer, Office of 
Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, 
Room 4227, MSC 9550, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-
9550, (301) 435-1439, lf33c.nih.gov.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos.: 93.279, Drug 
Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 18, 2014.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-27669 Filed 11-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES STYNE HASKINS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 301 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of April, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.

Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| August 7, 2009 |   | By: /s/ | Catherine H. Smith                    |
|----------------|--------|---------|-------------------------------------------------|
| (Date)         |   |    | Catherine H. Smith

President

  |

 

 

----
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm:

Street address: 

City/State/Zip:

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel are you 

a Federal Defender

CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this ourt an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this ourt’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 . . §1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on 

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

In Re: TikTok, Inc., Consumer 

Privacy Litigation

1:20-cv-04699

A.S., a Minor, through Guardian, A.S.,

Tiffany Marko Yiatras

Consumer Protection Legal, LLC

8235 Forsyth Boulevard, Suite 1100

Saint Louis, Missouri 63105-1643

6286795 314-541-0317

tiffany@consumerprotectionlegal.com

9/11/2020

Tiffany Marko Yiatras

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 68 Filed: 09/11/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1566
*10071.*

#### Young *v.*Standard Lumber Company.

Decided April 19, 1919.

Wade, C. J.

1. “Where an order for the purchase of goods is signed by the contemplating purchaser, and contains certain stipulations intended to become binding upon the purchaser, but makfes express provision that it is given subject to approval by the person to whom addressed, the order does not become binding as a contract until approved and accepted by the contemplated vendor.” *Howell*v. *Maine, 127 Ga.*574 (50 S. E. 771).-

2. No error of law is complained of; and since, under the evidence submitted on the trial, a verdict could- have been rendered for either the defendant or the plaintiff, the finding of the jury in favor of the latter, which has the approval of the trial judge, cannot be controlled.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.*

*640Complaint; from Barrow superior court—Judge Cobb. July 30, 1918.

*K. Carpenter, P. Cooley,*for plaintiff in error.

*C. A. Johns,*contra.
**EXHIBIT
31.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 I, Mel L. Shultz, certify that:
 
 1. 
 I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Stratford American
Corporation and its subsidiaries;
 
 2. 
 Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
 
 3.  
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.  
The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:
 
 a)  
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 
 b)  
evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)  
disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  
The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 
 a)  
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b)  
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.
  Date: May
      16, 2005
    
    /s/ 
      Mel L. ShultzMel
      L. Shultz
      President
      and Director
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -1 0- 00 00 8- CR Mario AMAY A , Appellant
v . T h e STA TE of

Te xas, Appellee Fr om the 186th J udicial District Court, Be x ar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2008CR4153 Honora ble Pat Priest, J udg e Presiding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Kar en Ang elini, J ustice Sandee B ry an Mar ion, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: Febr uary 17, 2010 DI SMI SSED The trial c ourt’s cer

tification in this appea l sta tes that the ca se is a “ple a-ba rg ain ca se, and the def endant ha s NO rig ht of appeal.” Rule 25.2(d) of the Te x as Rules of Appe llate Proce dure provides, “[t]he appeal must be dismissed if a certifica tion that shows the defe ndant has a rig ht of appea l has not been ma de par t of the re cord unde r these r ules.” T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d).04
- 10
- 00 00 8- CR

- 2- Appellant’s c ounsel has filed w ritten notice with thi s co u rt that counsel ha s review ed the
rec ord and “ca

n find no rig ht of appe al for A ppellant.” We construe this noti ce a s an indication that appellant will not seek to file a n amende d tri al co u rt cer tification showing that he has the rig ht of appea l. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 2 5. 2( d) ; 37 .1 ; se e als o D an ie ls v . S tat e , 1 1 0 S. W. 3 d 1 7 4 , 1 77 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 20 0 3 , n o p et.). I n light of the rec ord pre sented, we ag ree with appellant’s
c ou ns e l th a t Ru le 25 .2 (d ) requi res th is c ou rt to d ism iss thi s a

pp e a l. A c c or din g ly , th is a pp e a l is dismiss ed. PER C URI AM DO NO T PU B L I SH
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70574-70575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28061]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice: 14-125]


NASA Advisory Council; Human Exploration and Operations 
Committee; Meeting Postponement

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of postponement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, NASA announces a postponement of the

[[Page 70575]]

previously announced meeting of the Human Exploration and Operations 
Committee of the NASA Advisory Council (NAC). The meeting had been 
scheduled to be held on December 2 and 3, 2014. The meeting is being 
postponed by NASA due to exceptional circumstances and schedule 
conflicts of the NASA top leadership. The latter's attendance is 
required during this period for the NASA Senior Management Council 
meeting and final countdown preparations for launch of the Orion 
Exploration Flight Test-1 (EFT-1) on December 4, 2014, at NASA Kennedy 
Space Center in Florida.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Bette Siegel, Human Exploration 
and Operations Mission Directorate, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 
20546, (202) 358-2245, or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1173746565743f62787476747d517f7062703f767e67"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9dfff8e9e9f8b3eef4f8faf8f1ddf3fceefcb3faf2eb">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting was originally announced as NASA 
Notice 14-113 in the Federal Register on November 13, 2014, at 79 FR 
67468. The meeting had been scheduled to be held on Tuesday, December 
2, 2014, 10 a.m.-6 p.m.; and Wednesday, December 3, 2014, 8 a.m. to 
4:30 p.m.; Local Time, at NASA Headquarters, 300 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20546.

Patricia D. Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-28061 Filed 11-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.9


                Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Patriot Scientific
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended August 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Lowell W. Giffhorn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

        3)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        4)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.

                                         /S/ LOWELL W. GIFFHORN
                                         ----------------------
                                         Name:  Lowell W. Giffhorn
                                         Title:  Exec. V.P. and CFO
                                         Date: October 18, 2002
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32(a)


                                  CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the
"Report") of Lindsay Manufacturing Co. (the "Company") for the quarter ended
November 30, 2005, I, Richard W. Parod, Chief Executive Officer of the Company
and I, David B. Downing, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


          /s/ RICHARD W. PAROD
          -------------------------------
          President and Chief Executive Officer
          Richard W. Parod


          /s/ DAVID B. DOWNING
          -------------------------------
          Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
          David B. Downing


          January 9, 2006

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha
      Nutra, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31,
      2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Report"), I, Yue Pu, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and will be retained
      by China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




August
                19, 2008
            By:
            */s/
                Yue Pu*Name:
                Yue Pu
              Title: 
                Vice Chairman (Principal Financial and Accounting
                Officer)
10173, 10174.

#### Biggers *v.*Bank of Ringgold.

Decided May 7, 1919.

Affidavit of illegality; from Catoosa superior court—Judge Tarver. August 6, 1918.

*J. R. Johnston, Maddox, McCamy & Shumate,*for plaintiff in error.

*M. L. Harris,*contra.

Stephens, J.

There being no service of the bills of exceptions upon the defendant in error, or its counsel, and service not having been waived, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain these eases, and the writs of error are

*Dismissed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
**Exhibit 23**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Number 333-103688, Registration Statement Number 333-103687, Registration Statement Number333-103685, Registration Statement Number 333-103683, Registration Statement Number 333-101995, Registration Statement Number 333-102002, Registration Statement Number 333-102001, Registration Statement Number 333-101998, Registration StatementNumber 333-88186, Registration Statement Number 333-46752, Registration Statement Number 333-36054, Registration Statement Number 333-116445 and Registration Statement Number 333-121368 all on Form S-8 of Maytag Corporation and in the relatedProspectus of our reports dated February 11, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Maytag Corporation, Maytag Corporation management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Maytag Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 1, 2005. 

 

 

Chicago, Illinois 

February 14, 2005
**Exhibit 13.9**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Inmarsat Global Limited (the “Company”) forthe annual period ended 31 December 2008 (the “Periodic Report”), I, Andrew Sukawaty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Date: 29 April 2009
Exhibit 5 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 419-5 Filed: 09/10/21 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:10924
(12) United States Design Patent (10) Patent No.: 

USOOD73.9906S 

US D739,906S 

Chen (45) Date of Patent: Sep. 29, 2015 

(54) TWO-WHEELED VEHICLE D552,201 S * 10/2007 Kwak .......................... D21,765 

D567,883 S * 4/2008 Ota .............................. D21,421 

D572,332 S * 7/2008 Sramek et al. ............... D21,765 (71) Applicant: Shane Chen, Camas, WA (US) D607,525 S * 1/2010 Marciano ..................... D21,769 

(72) Inventor: Shane Chen, Camas, WA (US) * cited by examiner 

(**) Term: 14 Years Primary Examiner — Cynthia M Chin 

(22) Filed: Mar 12, 2013 The ornamental design for a two-wheeled vehicle, as shown 

and described. 

(51) LOC (10) Cl. ................................................ 21-02 

(52) U.S. Cl. DESCRIPTION 

USPC ......................................................... D21A760 

(58) Field of Classification Search FIG. 1 is a top view of the two-wheeled vehicle. 

USPC ........ D21/419, 421, 423,426, 760, 765, 766, FIG. 2 is a front elevation view of the vehicle of FIG. 1; the 

D21/769, 771, 776, 803: D12/1; 280/7.14, rear elevation views being identical thereto. 

280/11.14, 11.16, 11.19, 11.115, 11.226, FIG. 3 is a bottom view of the vehicle of FIG. 1. 

280/11.233, 11.25, 11.27, 11.28, 14.21, FIG. 4 is a perspective view of the vehicle of FIG. 1; and, 

280/87.01, 87.021, 87.03, 87.041, 87.042, FIG. 5 is a side view of the vehicle of FIG. 1; the opposite side 

280/809,811: 180/180, 181 view being identical thereto. 

See application file for complete search history. The broken lines represent functional components which are 

provided for context and do not form a part of the claimed 

(56) References Cited design. In FIGS. 1-4, the single broken line in the middle of 

the vehicle represents a joint whereby the right and left halves 

U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS of the vehicle may twist relative to each other as part of the 

D437.377 S * 2/2001 Fisher .......................... D21765 vehicle's function. 

D465,003 S * 10/2002 Ohrvallet al. ... D21,763 

D535,714 S * 1/2007 Cheng et al. ................. D21,763 1 Claim, 3 Drawing Sheets 

e rat a 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 419-5 Filed: 09/10/21 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:10925
U.S. Patent Sep. 29, 2015 Sheet 1 of 3 US D739,906S 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 419-5 Filed: 09/10/21 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:10926
U.S. Patent Sep. 29, 2015 Sheet 2 of 3 US D739,906S 

Fig. 3 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 419-5 Filed: 09/10/21 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:10927
U.S. Patent Sep. 29, 2015 Sheet 3 of 3 US D739,906S 

Fig. 3 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 419-5 Filed: 09/10/21 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:10928