alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha
      Nutra, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31,
      2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Report"), I, Marc Urbach, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and will be retained
      by China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




August
                19, 2008
            By:
            */s/ Marc
                Urbach*Name:
                Marc Urbach
              Title: 
                President (Principal Executive
                Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

Polypore International, Inc.  Chief Executive Officer Certification  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Polypore International, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended January 3, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Robert B. Toth, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



By:

/s/ ROBERT B. TOTH Robert B. Toth President and Chief Executive Officer


Date:
March 10, 2009

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE FORM 10-Q FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 FOR THE AETNA LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY
COMPANY AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            11,076
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                         133
<MORTGAGE>                                           5
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  11,647
<CASH>                                             987
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               3,003
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           1,155
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  58,054
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                  3,937
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  1
<POLICY-OTHER>                                      29
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           10,887
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,572
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    58,054
<PREMIUMS>                                         117
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                682
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                (23)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     118
<BENEFITS>                                         598
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                         96
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    239
<INCOME-TAX>                                        76
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                163
<DISCONTINUED>                                       5
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       168
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
10661.

#### Parker *v.*The State.

Broyles, O. J.

1. The court properly charged the law of circumstantial evidence.

2. The defendant was charged with the violation of a rule and regulation of the State veterinarian approved by the commissioner'of agriculture, to wit, Regulation 16, paragraph 3 of Bulletin 14, Series A, which prohibited the sale of hogs exposed to, or infected with, hog cholera. The *268defendant’s main contention,' supported by his statement and by the testimony of witnesses, was that he did not know that the hogs sold by him were infected with, or had been exposed to, hog cholera. It was therefore reversible error for the court, even in the absence of a timely and appropriate written request, to fail to submit to the jury this contention of the defendant, with instructions that if they found this contention to be true the defendant should be acquitted.

Decided October 10, 1919.

Accusation of misd ueanor; from city court of Dublin—Judge Flynt. May 19, 191,/.

*George H. Oar swell, J. 8. Adams,*for plaintiff in error.

*T. E. Hightower, solicitor,*contra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Luke-and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit
23.1
 
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Blackwater Midstream Corp. on Form S-8 (No. 333-152203), of our report dated
June 29, 2009, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Blackwater
Midstream Corporation as of March 31, 2009 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the period
December 23, 2008 through March 31, 2009, as well as the statements of
operations, net parent investment and cash flows of the Westwego, LA Terminal
Business for the period January 1, 2008 through December 22, 2008 and the year
ended December 31, 2007 appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended March 31, 2009.
  We also
consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration
Statement.
 
 /s/ MALONE & BAILEY, PCHouston,
      TexasJune
      29, 2009
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
TERVES LLC, Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

ECOMETAL INC., NICK YUAN, Defendants

- Appellants

YUEYANG AEROSPACE NEW MATERIALS CO. LTD., Defendant

______________________

2022

- 1855, 2022

- 2151

______________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Ohio in No. 1:19

- cv

- 01611

- DCN, Senior Judge Donald C. Nugent.

______________________

O R D E R

On December 5, 2023, Ecometal Inc., Nick Yuan, and Terves LLC stipulated to voluntary dismissal of Appeal No.

22

- 1855. On December 7, 2023, Ecometal Inc., Nick Yuan, and Terves LLC stipulated to voluntar y dismissal of Appeal No.

22

- 2151

. Case: 22-1855 Document: 69 Page: 1 Filed: 12/07/2023TERVES LLC v. YUEYANG AEROSPACE NEW MATERIALS CO

. LTD

. 2

The parties, having so agreed,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

The above

- captioned appeals are dismissed under Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), with each side to bear their own costs.

December 7, 2023
Date F OR THE C OURT

ISSUED AS A MANDATE : December 7, 2023. Case: 22-1855 Document: 69 Page: 2 Filed: 12/07/2023
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Travis Lamb v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-14-00901-CR

Trial court case number: 1394200

Trial court: 351st District Court of Harris County

The motion for rehearing is DENIED. The motion to publish is DENIED. It is so 

ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Brown.

Date: November 24, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         141,214
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  429,997
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,540
<INVENTORY>                                    265,119
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               910,134
<PP&E>                                       1,411,926
<DEPRECIATION>                                 710,791
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,125,066
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          366,703
<BONDS>                                        536,579
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       146,438
<OTHER-SE>                                     490,913
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,125,066
<SALES>                                      3,039,524
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,039,524
<CGS>                                        2,250,616
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,250,616
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                16,630
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              52,087
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 59,804
<INCOME-TAX>                                    74,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,996)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (5,480)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,476)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)
        

</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3987

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the automatic 

acquisition of citizenship by certain individuals born in Korea, Vietnam, 

Laos, Kampuchea, or Thailand. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2004

Mr. EVANS (for himself and Mr. MORAN of Virginia) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide 

for the automatic acquisition of citizenship by certain 

individuals born in Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Kampuchea, 

or Thailand.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTOMATIC ACQUISITION OF CITIZENSHIP FOR 

4 CERTAIN IMMIGRANTS BORN IN KOREA, 

5 VIETNAM, LAOS, KAMPUCHEA, OR THAILAND. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title III of the Immigration and 

7 Nationality Act is amended by inserting after section 320 

8 (8 U.S.C. 1431) the following new section: 
2

•HR 3987 IH 

1 ‘‘CERTAIN IMMIGRANTS BORN IN KOREA, VIETNAM, LAOS, 

2 KAMPUCHEA, OR THAILAND; CONDITIONS UNDER

3 WHICH CITIZENSHIP AUTOMATICALLY ACQUIRED

4 ‘‘SEC. 321. A person automatically becomes a citizen 

5 of the United States when the person is residing in the 

6 United States and has been lawfully admitted for perma7 nent residence in the United States pursuant to a classi8 fication petition approved under section 204(f).’’. 

9 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

10 of the Immigration and Nationality Act is amended by in11 serting after the item relating to section 320 the following 

12 new item:

‘‘Sec. 321. Certain immigrants born in Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Kampuchea, or 

Thailand; conditions under which citizenship is automatically 

acquired.’’.

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this section shall take effect 120 days after the date of 

15 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### J. W. Bowling *v.*Wm. C. Adkins, etc.

Schools and School Districts — Loss of Right to Redeem Property — Negligence.

Appellant’s loss of right to redeem property held to have resulted from his negligence.

APPEAL FROM MORGAN CIRCUIT COURT.

December 8, 1872.

*Hazelrigg,.for appellant.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

Appellant’s right to redeem the horses by the express terms of his contract was limited to a definite period, within which, nor at its expiration, he neither p;aid the money, tendered it, nor procured an extension of the time to redeem.

He was present when the appellee, Mrs. Adkins, transferred the benefit of her purchase to Pennington, and assented to it — his right of redemption having been secured to him by Pennington, it therefore worked no detriment to him'.

There is no evidence even conducing to show that Mrs. Adkins and Pennington, or either of them1, prevented or attempted to prevent competition in the bidding at the sale of the horses; but appellant’s own witness, Murray, proves, that he and his son prevailed on the witness to cease when he was bidding for one of the horses.

If appellant has lost the right to redeem1 the property it resulted from his own negligence, and he must abide the consequences.

Judgment *affirmed.*

-, *for appellees.*
11200.

#### Britt *v.*Howard, judge.

Decided January 6, 1920.

Petition for mandamus.

*G. Y. Tigner,*for petitioner.

Bboyles, C. J.

A bill of exceptions was tendered to the judge, and he refused to sign it, and returned it, within ten days, to the movant’s counsel, with his written objections, pointing out therein, among other things, that the bill of exceptions contained material statements of fact which were not true. It not appearing that the objections specified by the judge were met and removed, this court will not require him to sign the bill of exceptions. Civil Code (1910), § 6158; *Campbell*v. *Foute,*6 *Ga. App.*113 (64 S. E. 292); *Covin*v. *Willie,*19 *Ga. App.*259 (91 S. E. 278), and citations.

*Mandamus nisi denied.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ,, concur.*
#### Priscilla Arosmith *v.*Samuel Plummer.

Replevin. — Title.

Sufficiency of evidence of title to tne property sought to be recovered.

Husband and Wife — Action by Wife in Name of .Husband.

A wife was held not to show a right to prosecute an action in the name of her husband under section 51, Code of Civ. Prac.

*444APPEAL FROM FLEMING CIRCUIT COURT.

February 9, 1873.

*Cord", for appellant.*

*Andrews, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

There are two controlling- and all sufficient reasons why the judgment in this case should be affirmed.

1st. There is no evidence tending to show that the title to the mare was in Johnson-Young instead of the defendant Plummer,-except the judgment in the case of *Smith v. Young,*to which Plum-mer was no party, and of the prosecution of which, so far as appears from this record, he had no notice. It follows, therefore, that said judgment is not evidence against him.

2d. Appellant shows by her pleading that she is a feme covert and that she has no authority from her husband to prosecute this action in his name, and the testimony, instead of showing that her husband had deserted his family, as required by the 51st section of the civil code of practice tends to show that appellant deserted him.

Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed.*
No. 15,228.

#### Courtney *v.*Courtney.

Appellate *Court.*— Money *Demand.*— Jurisdiction—An appeal from a ruling sustaining a motion by attorneys for the vacation of an order of dismissal of plaintiffs’ action, and for an allowance of fifty dollars for their fee, is within the jurisdiction of the Appellate Court.

From the Switzerland Circuit Court.

*J. T. Ellis*and *G. 8. Pleasants,*for appellant.

*J. A. Works*and *F. M. Griffith,*for appellee.

*273Filed Oct. 10, 1891.

Elliott, J. —

America Courtney, the wife of the appellant, Andrew J. Courtney, filed a petition for a divorce. Various orders were made in the cause, among them an order requiring appellant to pay into court for the usé of his wife in preparing for trial, the sum of fifty dollars. The appellee was represented by Messrs. Griffith and Works who acted as her attorneys. The appellee duly filed a dismissal in the office of the clerk during vacation, and the clerk entered an order dismissing the suit. Subsequently Messrs. Griffith and Works filed a motion to vacate the order of dismissal, and asking an allowance of fifty dollars for their fee in prosecuting the suit of America Courtney against her husband. The motion was sustained and the allowance decreed.

It is evident that the-actual controversy is as to the right of Griffith and Works to a money judgment. It may possibly be true that, as an incident of this fight and as collateral to it, the question of the correctness of the ruling vacating the motion to dismiss is involved, but even if this be true the question is incidental and collateral and not controlling. The element which gives character to the case is the demand for the recovery of a judgment for money, and as the recovery sought is only fifty dollars the case is within the jurisdiction of the Appellate Court. It is, therefore, ordered that it be transferred to the docket of that court.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

EMOJI COMPANY GmbH, )

) Case No. 20-cv-5068

Plaintiff, ) 

)

) Judge Virginia M. Kendall

v. )

)

THE INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, )

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, )

PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED )

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED )

ON SCHEDULE A HERETO, )

)

Defendants. )

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff EMOJI COMPANY 

GmbH hereby dismisses with prejudice all causes of action in the complaint against the following 

Defendants identified in Schedule A. Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs.

No. Defendant 

14 JessPad

67 Jo3657tyuis

88 jg48

220 McC538arthy

269 MYHeart1654

The respective Defendants have not filed an answer to the complaint or a motion for summary 

judgment in this matter. Therefore, it is respectfully submitted that dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is 

appropriate.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: January 22, 2021 By: s/Michael A. Hierl _ 

Michael A. Hierl (Bar No. 3128021)

William B. Kalbac (Bar No. 6301771)

Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd.

Three First National Plaza

70 W. Madison Street, Suite 4000

Chicago, Illinois 60602

(312) 580-0100 Telephone

mhierl@hsplegal.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

EMOJI COMPANY GmbH

Case: 1:20-cv-05068 Document #: 64 Filed: 01/22/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:3171
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned attorney hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of 

Voluntary Dismissal was filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court and served on all counsel of 

record and interested parties via the CM/ECF system on January 22, 2021.

s/Michael A. Hierl

Case: 1:20-cv-05068 Document #: 64 Filed: 01/22/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:3172
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Clover
Appreciation Properties I, L.P. 1997 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000837103
<NAME> CLOVER APPRECIATION PROPERTIES I, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         432,936
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 441,428
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     379,119
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   441,428
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               348,318
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  306,134
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             129,837
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,115,795
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,157,979
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   310.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Partnership has an unclassified balance sheet.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
(32.1)

**CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
**18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
**AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
**SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Met-Pro Corporation ("Met-Pro")
hereby certifies that:

(1)
    Met-Pro’s
      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended Jannuary 31, 2005, to
      which the certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Met-Pro.


/s/
Raymond J. De
HontApril
13, 2005
Raymond
J. De Hont
Chief
Executive Officer



























Exhibit
(32.1)
**CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
**18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
**AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
**SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**



The undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Met-Pro Corporation ("Met-Pro")
hereby certifies that:

(1)
    Met-Pro’s
      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2005, to
      which the certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Met-Pro.


/s/
Gary J.
Morgan                                                                                   April13, 2005
Gary
J. Morgan
Chief
Financial Officer