alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
   
     We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to
the use of our reports dated (i) February 10, 1997 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Commodore Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries,
(ii) February 3, 1997 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Southern Star Communications, Inc., formerly known as Osborn Communications
Corporation, and (iii) March 5, 1998, except for Notes 2 and 14 as to which the
date is April 27, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
SFX Broadcasting Inc. and Subsidiaries, all included in Amendment No. 4 to the
Registration Statement (Form S-1, No. 333-48819) and related Prospectus of
Capstar Broadcasting Corporation for the registration of shares of its common
stock.
    
 
                                            ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
New York, New York
   
May 20, 1998
EXHIBIT 32.1  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) by Lotus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Registrant), I, Liu Zhong Yi, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:  1.
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
  2.
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.
  /s/ Liu Zhong YiName: Liu Zhong YiTitle: Chief Executive Officer
  Dated: February 19, 2008
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report ofDesign Source, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Peter Reichard, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated this 27th day of June, 2006.



| | PETER REICHARD                                     
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Peter Reichard                                     
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



















---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4222

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

550 Nebraska Avenue in Kansas City, Kansas, as the ‘‘Newell George 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2004

Mr. MOORE (for himself, Mr. TIAHRT, Mr. RYUN of Kansas, and Mr. MORAN

of Kansas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 550 Nebraska Avenue in Kansas City, Kansas, 

as the ‘‘Newell George Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NEWELL GEORGE POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 550 Nebraska Avenue in Kansas 

6 City, Kansas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘New7 ell George Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
2

•HR 4222 IH 

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the Newell George Post 

3 Office Building.

Æ
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha
Nutra, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Pu Yue, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and will be retained by China
Broadband, Inc. (f/k/a Alpha Nutra, Inc.) and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




August
      19, 2009PuYue (Principal Accounting and
      Financial Officer)
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Four **th Court of Appeals**

**San Antonio, Texas**

February 25, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00064

- CR

Donald AEKINS

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 403rd District Court, Travis County, Texas

Trial Court No. D

- 1

- DC

- 12

- 904056

Brenda Kennedy, Judge Presid ing



### ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

The panel has considered the Appellant ’ s Motion for Rehearing, and the motion is

DENIED. The Appellant ’ s Motion to Suspend Rule 9.3(b) is hereby GRA NTED.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 25th day of February, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7093
ELDON GUY BELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES B. HUNT, JR., Governor; FR ANKLIN FREEMAN, Secretary of Correct ions; TALMADGE L.BARNETT, Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Institution; CHARLES EURGIA LAND, Doctor; DOCTOR BALOCH, Medical Director; GENEVA BERRY, R.N.; MRS. LAPINSKI, R.N., Nurse, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-94-860-5-CT-H) Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 4, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eldon Guy Bell, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bell v. Hunt , No. CA-94- 860-5-CT-H (E.D.N.C. June 6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christopher R. Huber, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                             |  |                                                         
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Dated: March 5, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    CHRISTOPHER R.
HUBER
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                       |  | Christopher R. Huber                                    
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                      |  | Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Operations
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                             |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

John Anthony Sanchez, * From the 70th District Court

of Ector County,

Trial Court No. A-18-1478-CR.

Vs. No. 11-21-00259-CR * July 20, 2023

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J. 

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
The Board of Directors
Verio Inc.:
 
     We consent to the use of our reports included herein and to the reference
to our firm under the heading "Experts" in the Prospectus.
 

                                          /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 
Denver, Colorado
July 6, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HEARTSOFT, INC., AS OF JUNE 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         552,533
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  280,103
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     12,874
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               963,715
<PP&E>                                         188,060
<DEPRECIATION>                                  76,342
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,783,411
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          292,692
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,550
<COMMON>                                         2,512
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,444,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,783,411
<SALES>                                        459,166
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               457,516
<CGS>                                          215,372
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  215,372
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               183,309
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,367
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,468
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,975
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             39,523
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    39,523
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
#### Royster Guano Company *v.*Odum, administrator.

Atkinson, J.

1. The right to attack a deed to realty, based on a valuable consideration, executed by a wife to her husband, on the ground that it was a sale of her separate estate and void under the provisions of the Civil Code (1910), § 3009, is personal to the wife, and such a deed can not be attacked upon such ground except by her or her privies in blood or estate. *Scaife*v. *Scaife,*134 *Ga.*1 (67 S. E. 408), and cit.; *Munroe*v. *Baldwin,*145 *Ga.*215 (3) (88 S. E. 947)*; Williams*v. *Rhodes,*149 *Ga.*170 (99 S. E. 531). A wife’s judgment creditor for the price of goods sold to her is not her privy by blood or estate, and as such authorized to attack her deed upon grounds as above indicated.

2. Under the facts of this case the administrator of the estate of the deceased husband was not estopped from asserting title to the land conveyed by the wife to the husband.

3. On the trial of the case, in which a levy upon the land as the property of the wife was resisted by a statutory claim interposed by the administrator of- the estate of the deceased husband, a verdict finding “in favor of the claimant the title to the land in question” is to be construed as including a finding that the property is not subject to levy and sale *656under the fl. fa., and is sufficient in form to comply with the ruling in *Widincamp*v. *James,*129 *Ga.*279 (2) (58 S. E. 836), and cit.

No. 6463.

January 17, 1929.

4. At the conclusion of the evidence offered by both sides the judge did not err in directing a verdict for the claimant as above indicated.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices ooneur.*

*657
      *A, 8.*Way, for plaintiff.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Standard Companies Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, G. Peter DAloia, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|                                                 
|/s/ G. Peter DAloia                             
|G. Peter DAloia                                 
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



July 26, 2005
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.1



                          ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT TO THE
                           ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                   CENTRAL ARKANSAS COLD STORAGE-TEXAS, INC.
                 (Originally incorporated on October 20, 1997)



         Pursuant to the provisions of Article 4.04 of the Texas Business
Corporation Act, CENTRAL ARKANSAS COLD STORAGE-TEXAS, INC. (the "Corporation")
hereby adopts Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation which
amend the Articles of Incorporation and all amendments thereto that are in
effect to date as hereafter set forth and which contain no other change in any
provision thereof.


                                  ARTICLE ONE

         The name of the Corporation is Central Arkansas Cold Storage-Texas, 
Inc.


                                  ARTICLE TWO

         The following amendment to the Articles of Incorporation has been
adopted in conformity with the provisions of the Texas Business Corporation Act
and such amendment was duly adopted by the sole shareholder of the Corporation
on the 3rd day of February 1998.

         The amendment alters or changes Article One of the original Articles
of Incorporation and the full text in its entirety of the new Article One, as
amended, is as follows:

                                  "ARTICLE ONE

                 The name of the corporation is PACKAGED ICE SOUTHEAST, INC.
(the "Corporation")."


                                 ARTICLE THREE

         The number of shares outstanding at the time of such adoption was One
Thousand (1,000); the number of shares entitled to vote on the Amendment to the
Articles of Incorporation was One Thousand (1000).
<PAGE>   2
                                  ARTICLE FOUR

         The holder of all of the shares outstanding and entitled to vote on
said amendment has signed a consent in writing pursuant to Article 9.10 of the
Texas Business Corporation Act adopting said amendment and any written notice
required by Article 9.10 of the Texas Business Corporation Act has been given.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, these Articles of Amendment to the Articles of
Incorporation, which amends certain provisions of the Articles of Incorporation
of the Corporation, having been duly adopted in accordance with Article 4.04 of
the Texas Business Corporation Act, has been duly executed by its President
this 4th day of February 1998.

                                     CENTRAL ARKANSAS COLD STORAGE-TEXAS, INC.





                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     By:  A.J. Lewis, III, President








                                       2
Order entered October 9, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 13 - 01241 - CV TIMOTHY HOLZ, Appellant

V. U.S.A. CORP., ET AL. , Appellee s On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 13 - 05101



### O RDER The Court has before it appellant’s September 26, 2013 motion requesting leave to appeal in forma pauperis

. The motion is DENIED without prejudice to the refiling of a motion containing an affidavit in compliance with T EX . R

. A PP . P. 20.1(b).

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4306 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 4306

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 7, 2004

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend section 274A of the Immigration and Nationality Act to improve 
 the process for verifying an individual's eligibility for employment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMPROVEMENTS TO EMPLOYMENT VERIFICATION SYSTEM.

    (a) In General.--Section 274A(b) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1324a(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting before ``A person or 
        entity has complied'' the following: ``Such attestation may be 
        manifested by either a hand-written or an electronic 
        signature.'';
            (2) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the following: 
        ``Such attestation may be manifested by either a hand-written 
        or an electronic signature.''; and
            (3) in paragraph (3), by inserting ``a paper, microfiche, 
        microfilm, or electronic version of'' after ``must retain''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the earlier of--
            (1) the date on which final regulations implementing such 
        amendments take effect; or
            (2) 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 6, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### STATE v. COCALIS

No. 274A97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 226

Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 23 July 1997.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM
10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      56,242,000
<SECURITIES>                                10,101,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               43,328,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,149,000
<INVENTORY>                                 12,678,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           125,085,000
<PP&E>                                      87,537,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              40,385,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             181,831,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       30,174,000
<BONDS>                                     82,650,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       285,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,407,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               181,831,000
<SALES>                                     50,047,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            57,708,000
<CGS>                                       10,161,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,161,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            49,795,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,390,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,638,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   295,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,933,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,933,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.21)
        

</TABLE>