alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                 5
<LEGEND>
McDonnell Douglas Corporation
Financial Data Schedule (FDS)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                     0000063917
<NAME>                    MCDONNELL DOUGLAS
<MULTIPLIER>              1,000,000
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                        DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                  1,094
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             882
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                             3,486
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            0
<PP&E>                                                  4,074
<DEPRECIATION>                                         (2,621)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         11,631
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       0
<BONDS>                                                 3,433 <F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                  210
<OTHER-SE>                                              2,828
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           11,631
<SALES>                                                13,375
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       13,834
<CGS>                                                  11,409
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          12,611
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        121
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         1,223
<INCOME-TAX>                                              435
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       788
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                              788
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               3.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               3.64
<FN>
<F1> (1)  Mortgages and similar debt.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science

Forensic Science Standards Board Meeting

August 16, 2023, 12:30 p.m. – 2:30 p.m. ET

12:30 p.m. CALL MEETING TO ORDER - ROLL CALL Ray Wickenheiser

12:35 p.m. Old Business [Information/Vote] Ray Wickenheiser

1. R&D Needs Update [Information] V. Desiderio

2. Organizational Priorities - Review and Vote on Revisions [Vote] M. LeBeau

12:55 p.m. New Business [Information] Ray Wickenheiser

3. AFQAM Representative C. Krug

4. OSAC Leadership Strategy Session - 8/30/2023 [Agenda | SC Reports Instructions] D. Sirk

5. FSSB Quarterly Meeting - In Person - 9/13-9/14/2023 [Draft Agenda] R. Wickenheiser

1:10 p.m. Standards and Documents in Process [Action] John Jones

6. SDO Published

a. Registry Recirculations: None

b. Registry Petitions: 3 - Petition Discussions Held for September FSSB Meeting

- ASB 024-21, Standard for Training and Certification of Canine Detection of Humans: Location Check 

Using Pre-scented Canines

- ASB 026-21, Standard for Training and Certification of Canine Detection of Humans: An Aged Trail Using 

Pre-scented Canines

- ASB 027-21, Standard for Training and Certification of Canine Detection of Humans: Patrol Canine Team

c. Registry Review - New Introductions: None

d. Registry Review - 5-Year: 1 - List of Standards: PETITION DUE: 9/6/2023

- ASTM E2329-17, Standard Practice for Identification of Seized Drugs M. LeBeau

7. OSAC Proposed

a. Registry Recirculations: None

b. Registry Petitions: None

c. Registry Review - New Introductions: 1 PETITION DUE: 9/6/2023

- 2022-S-0008, Standard Guide for Minimum Facial Image Comparison Documentation [Intro] L. Sims

- 2022-S-0024, Best Practice Recommendations for Evaluative Forensic DNA Testimony [PREVIEW] J. Jones

d. Registry Review - 5-Year: None

8. Cross Cutting Documents: 1 New Document [Attachment]

9. SAC Updates [Information] FSSB Vice Chair/SAC Chairs

a. Biology C. Sobieralski

b. Chemistry: Seized Drugs/Toxicology M. LeBeau

c. Chemistry: Trace Materials C. Taylor

d. Digital/Multimedia L. Sims

i.Facial Identification SC Expanded Scope [Attachment]

e. Medicine E. Conlon

f. Physics/Pattern Interpretation M.Gische

g. Scene Examination C. Beyler
Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science

Forensic Science Standards Board Meeting

August 16, 2023, 12:30 p.m. – 2:30 p.m. ET

11. FSSB Task Groups [Action/Information] Chris Krug

a. Human Factors H. Arkes

b. Implementer Cohort S. Kerrigan/C. Taylor

c. Legal L. Garcia

d. Outreach/Communications J. Ropero-Miller

e. Proficiency Testing C. Taylor

f. Quality C. Krug

g. Reporting and Testimony - Review Marketing of Revised Guidance M. LeBeau

h. Root Cause Analysis - Review Progress C. Krug

i. Statistics W. Guthrie

2:25 p.m. Action Item Recap A. Getz

2:30 p.m. ADJOURN

NEXT MEETINGS:

September 13-14, 2023 - in person, Olathe, KS. There is NO meeting September 20, 2023
#### Blankenship *v.*State.

Opinion delivered October 29, 1928.

*H. W. Applegate,*Attorney General, and *John L. Carter,*Assistant, for appellee.

Kirby, J.

This appeal is prosecuted from a conviction for having in possession a still.

The officers testified that they had the still under surveillance, being concealed near it, ¡and that appellant and his companion appeared about 7 o’clock, and moved some wood back and began to dip water out of the branch and pour it into the mash barrels. Two barrels of mash had been run and the mash in two more was ready to run, and the still was warm from the last run, which must have been made that .night. The boys were filling up the two barrels with more water. Appellant unscrewed the connection and let the refuse run out of the pot, and in carrying it away discovered the officers, and ran. The still was on his grandmother’s place, in the pasture, and he said that he had discovered it before, and that he was down there that morning putting the water in the mash to keep the cows from eating the shorts, under the instruction of his grandmother, who had lost a yearling from eating mash at a still. Said he did not own the still and the mash, and had no control over it, and ran away when he saw the officers because he was frightened.

He was found present at the still, which was yet warm from the last run made, and making- the necessary preparations for making another run, and ran away upon ascertaining that his presence was discovered. The *191testimony is sufficient to support the charge that appellant was in possession of the still, the proof of ownership not being necessary. *Day*v. *State.,*170 Ark. 790, 281 S. W. 11.

No error was assigned- as to the admission and exclusion of testimony, and the court correctly declared the law. The judgment must be affirmed, and it is so ordered.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<LEGEND>
     The condensed consolidated financial statements contained in the form 10-Q
     for the 3 months ended March 31, 2000 for the Aetna Life Insurance and
     Annuity Company.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000837010
<NAME>                        Aetna Life Insurance and Annuity Company
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           11,400
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     210
<MORTGAGE>                                     5
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 11,965
<CASH>                                         787
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             3,008
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         1,088
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 60,100
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                3,881
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            1
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 37
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          10,916
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,438
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   60,100
<PREMIUMS>                                     36
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            228
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (9)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 37
<BENEFITS>                                     201
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    31
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                76
<INCOME-TAX>                                   25
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            51
<DISCONTINUED>                                 2
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   53
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         140,357
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  199,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                   102,000
<INVENTORY>                                     10,707
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               488,940
<PP&E>                                          65,041
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,129,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          122,341
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       308,458
<OTHER-SE>                                     438,491
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,129,346
<SALES>                                        384,738
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               384,738
<CGS>                                           28,769
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,769
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               202,015
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                153,955
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            153,955
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   153,955
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 99(b)

                                  CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the
"Report") of Lindsay Manufacturing Co. (the "Company") for the quarter ended May
31, 2003, I, Bruce C. Karsk, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

          /s/ Bruce C. Karsk
          -------------------------------
          Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
          Bruce C. Karsk

          July 15, 2003

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       23
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

The Directors 

Inmarsat Group Limited 

99 City Road 

London EC1Y 1AX 

United Kingdom 

 

The Directors 

Inmarsat Finance plc 

99 City Road 

London EC1Y 1AX 

United Kingdom 

 

7 February 2008 

 

Dear Sirs: 

 

**CONSENT TO REFERENCE WATSON WYATT LIMITED IN INMARSAT GROUP LIMITED AND INMARSAT FINANCEPLC 2006 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F**

 

We hereby consent toyour reference to our name in your 2007 annual report on Form 20-F in connection with the disclosure of pensions and post-retirement medical information (collectively, the “Pensions Disclosure”) therein. In giving such consent, we do notthereby admit that we come within the category of person whose consent is required under Section 7 or Section 11 of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the rules and regulations adopted by theU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) thereunder, nor do we admit that we are experts with respect to any part of such Form 20-F within the meaning of the term “experts” as used in the Securities Act or theSEC’s rules and regulations adopted thereunder. Although we understand you used our report to draft the Pensions Disclosure, you are solely responsible for the scope and substance of the Pensions Disclosure. 

 

Sincerely
10481.

#### Grow *v.*Solomon.

Broyles, O. J.

The original deed, or timber lease, which was the basis of an action for breach of warranty af title to standing timber, contained the following description of the timber: “all of the timber of every description except (oak and hickory) now, standing or growing in or on the swamp and flat creek lands of Spring Creek, where the same runs through 169 acres off of the south side of lots of land 149 *260one forty-nine, and one seventy-one (171) in the thirteenth district (13th) of Miller County, Georgia, except such timber as may be on thirty-one (31) acres of lots of land in the southeastern corner of said lot number 149, belonging to Mrs. Eliza Stanton, . . Also excepting that portion of lot 171 included under fence J. S. Bush.” *Held:*This description is too indefinite and uncertain, even when aided by the extrinsic documentary evidence attached to ■ the petition, to afford any means of identifying the exact body of timber which the maker of the deed intended to convey. The deed, therefore, did not pass title to any of the timbei:, and the suit should have been dismissed on the general demurrer interposed. See, in this connection, *Huntress*v. *Portwood,*116 *Ga.*351 (42 S. E. 513); *Crawford*v. *Verner,*122 *Ga.*814 (50 S. E. 958) ; *McSwain*v. *Ricketson,*129 *Ga.*176 (58 S. E. 655); *Youmans*v. *Moore,*144 *Ga.*375 (87 S. E. 273).

Decided October 10, 1919.

Action for damages'; from Miller superior court—Judge Worrill. March 27, 1919.

*P. D. Rich, W. I. Geer,*for plaintiff in error.

*N. L. Stapleton,*contra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 413

To require the Surface Transportation Board to consider certain issues when 

deciding whether to authorize the construction of a railroad line. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2003

Mr. GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To require the Surface Transportation Board to consider 

certain issues when deciding whether to authorize the 

construction of a railroad line.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Neighborhood Rail Ac5 countability Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

7 Section 10901 of title 49, United States Code, is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following new sub9 sections: 
2

•HR 413 IH 

1 ‘‘(e) In determining whether to issue a certificate au2 thorizing the construction of an additional railroad line, 

3 or the construction of an extension to any railroad line, 

4 the Board shall give greater weight to local official state5 ments and public comments in opposition to the proposed 

6 construction, especially with respect to construction in a 

7 residential area, if there is an an unusually high level of 

8 such public opposition. 

9 ‘‘(f) Before issuing a certificate under this section au10 thorizing the construction of an additional railroad line, 

11 or the construction of an extension to any railroad line, 

12 the Board shall identify any disproportionate negative im13 pacts on any socioeconomic population, and shall include 

14 a discussion of alternatives that were considered that 

15 would have avoided such disproportionate negative im16 pacts. 

17 ‘‘(g) If the Board receives information indicating that 

18 an applicant for a certificate under this section has pro19 vided to the Board false information that could materially 

20 affect the Board’s determination, the process of consid21 ering the application shall be halted until the Board has 

22 determined whether such information has been provided, 

23 and whether the information was knowingly provided. If 

24 the Board determines that such information has been pro25 vided unknowingly, the Board shall require the applicant 
3

•HR 413 IH 

1 to provide correct information before the process may re2 sume. If the Board determines that such information has 

3 been provided knowingly, the Board shall not issue a cer4 tificate pursuant to that application.’’.

Æ
Filed 5/15/08 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2008 ND 83

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Amy Jo Charlotte Vaagen a/k/a 

Amy Jo Kruckenberg, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20070337

Appeal from the District Court of Morton County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Robert O. Wefald, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Brian David Grosinger, Assistant State’s Attorney, 210 2nd Avenue NW, Mandan, ND 58554, for plaintiff and appellee; on brief.

Kent M. Morrow, 411 North Fourth Street, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, ND 58502-2155, for defendant and appellant; on brief.

State v. Vaagen

No. 20070337

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Amy Vaagen appeals the district court’s judgment entered after a jury found her guilty of failure to pay child support under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-37-01.  Vaagen argues insufficient evidence exists to support the guilty verdict.

[¶2]The district court’s judgment is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶3]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(c)

                                Robert P. DePalo
                      Director American HealthChoice, Inc.
                               208-16 38th Avenue
                             Bayside, New York 11361
                               Tel: (718) 428-7916
                               Fax: (718) 279-2192

                                                                    July 2, 1998


The Board of Directors
American HealthChoice, Inc.
1300 West Walnut Lane
Irving, Texas 75038

Gentlemen,

I have come to the conclusion that there exist irreconcilable differences of
opinion between the managing directors and me with respect to the governance of
AHIC. These differences, when coupled with the intractability of management
thereon have made it impossible for me to continue to act effectively as a
director of the company.

Most recently, the company held a meeting of the board of directors on June 30,
1998 and senior management was successful in imposing their will to force the
company into reorganization under The US Bankruptcy code. I as a director of the
company relying on the financial reporting of the company by senior management
still believe that the company has ample assets to seek enough account
receivable and asset financing to reorganize the company and protect our
shareholders interest. I believe that the bankruptcy process will cost the
company approximately $500,000 in legal and administrative fees and these funds
are better used to stabilize the company in an orderly liquidation and
reorganization of the company. In addition, I do not believe that the company
has explored all its options for financing. As recently as April 1998, Dr.
Stucki informed me in writing that the company was stable and receivable
financing was obtainable.

Therefore, it is with great regret that I hereby tender my resignation as a
director of American HealthChoice, Inc. effectively immediately. I also request,
pursuant to SEC regulations that my resignation and the content of this letter
be disclosed in a form 8-K to be filed by AHC.

Sincerely,


/s/ Robert P. DePalo
Robert P. DePalo
FY 2022 Center State Competition NOFO

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Who’s considered to be key personnel?

A: Key personnel include the Center Director and Chief Financial Officer. As stated on Page 15 

of the NOFO, applicants are required to submit as part of their application (does not count 

toward the page limit) resumes for all key personnel assigned to the project. Resumes must be 

a maximum of two pages each. Additional pages beyond the two pages per resume will not be 

considered during the evaluation of the application.

Q: Why is it an open competition?

A: In accordance with 15 U.S.C §278K, which is the program authority, when an MEP Center has 

operated for a period of 10 consecutive years, a competition must be conducted to select an 

eligible entity to operate the Center. The MEP Centers in the States of Kentucky, Nebraska, 

Rhode Island, and South Dakota are each nearing 10 consecutive years of operation.