alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                       7,446,369
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,492,082
<ALLOWANCES>                                   261,466
<INVENTORY>                                 14,973,169
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,683,453
<PP&E>                                      27,878,890
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,947,614
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              72,888,641
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,387,868
<BONDS>                                     14,067,047
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       713,862
<OTHER-SE>                                  45,211,245
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                72,888,641
<SALES>                                     67,390,488
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            67,390,488
<CGS>                                       43,340,575
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               56,588,672
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             398,051
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,420,523
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,269,471
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,151,052
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,151,052
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03
        


</TABLE>
#### Bussard, Appellee, *v.*Kennedy et al., Appellants.

(No. 2023

Decided November 11, 1948.)

*Mr. C. J. Stoecklein,*for appellee.

*Mr. D. H. Wysong,*for appellants.

By the Court.

This cause is submitted on motion of plaintiff, appellee herein, to dismiss the appeal on ■questions of law and fact. The only question involved is whether the Common Pleas Court of Montgomery county erred in affirming the judgment of the Municipal Court of Dayton, in a civil action for money only.

Obviously an appeal on questions of law and fact does not lie. The motion to dismiss the appeal on questions of law and fact is sustained. The case will be retained as an appeal on questions of law.

The record discloses that a bill of exceptions has been settled in the trial court and, also, has been filed prematurely in this court. The court allows defendants, appellants herein, ten days from the date of the ■entry journalizing this decision within which to refile the bill of exceptions in this court, and the same time *96is given within which to file their assignments of error and brief. The plaintiff is given ten days after the date of the filing of briefs by defendants within which to file an answer brief; and the defendants are given five days after the date of the filing of the answer brief within which to file a reply brief, should they desire to do so.

Counsel will draw the proper entry.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Wiseman, P. J., Miller and Hornbeck, JJ., concur.
#### A. J. Beal *v.*John Lampkins.

Bills and Notes — Signing Note on Back Instead of End — Presumption—• Insolvency of Obligor.

Where a party writes his name across the back of a note instead of signing'it at the end, it will be presumed that he intended to become bound as an endorser or guarantor and not as a co-obligor, and in that case the payee has no cause of action against him until he has prosecuted the obligor to insolvency.

APPEAL, FROM MARION CIRCUIT COURT.

Reversed October 13, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The name of the appellant A. J. Beal having been written across the back of Carter’s note instead of signed at the close of it, the legal presumption is 'that he intended to become bound as an endorser or guarantor, and not as a co-obligor ■ with Carter. To escape this presumption appellee by his amended an*197swer charges that Beal’s name waá thus written because there was not room at the close of the note, but ¡that he so signed it in pursuance to' a contract between appellee and Carter, intending thereby to bind himself as a co-obligor. It is these allegations which make the petition good, and upon the truth of the same depends appellee’s right to recover against Beal in this action. Appellant by his answer denies any knowledge, information or belief as to the alleged agreement between appellee and Canter.- He denies that he undertook to be bound on the note as a co-obligor or that he signed his name on the back of it with any such intention, and alleges- that his intention was to bind himself as an end'orsér or assignor and in no other way.

*Harrison, for appellant.*

*Lindsay, for appellee.*

If this answer be true, appellee can have no cause of action against Beal until with proper diligence he' prosecutes Carter to insolvency. The court erred in sustaining appellee’s demurrer. Judgment is reversed and this cause remanded with instructions to overrule said demurrer and for further proceedings consistent with -this opinion.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

Dec ember 17 , 2014 

# Order

Clerk 

### Dec ember 17 , 2014

1 50 404 ( 3 )

IN RE J . CEDRIC SIMPSON

, JUDGE

14A DISTRICT COURT SC: 150 404

JTC Formal Complaint 9 6

BEFORE THE JUDICIAL TENURE COMMISSION

___________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the December 2 , 2014 order of the Court appointing the

Hon. Timothy P. Pickard as master to hear Judicial Tenure Commission Formal

Complaint No. 9 6 is RESCINDED. On further order of the Court, the Hon. Peter D.

Houk is appointed as master to hear the formal complaint.
#### Peter Bramlett's Ex'r *v.*Clarissa Bramlette, etc.

Wills — Provision for Support of slaves.

Where a testator provided in his will for a comfortable support of two of his isiaves the provision- for the benefit of the slaves -should be.upheld, it being the duty of the court to set apart a sum sufficient for their comfortable support.

Wills — Slaves as Devisees.

Where, prior to the adoption of the 13th amendment to the Federal Constitution, a testator made provisions in his will for the support of , two of his slaves, and the testator died after the adoption of the 13th amendment, the devisees had the legal capacity to sue in their own names, since the will spoke from the time of the testator’s death.

APPEAL FROM -BOURBON' CIRCUIT COURT.

June 6, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

It is not to be asumed that Peter Bram-lett, deceased, in making provision in his will for the comfortable support of -his two slaves, Hiram- and Clarissa, intended merely to1 discharge a legal duty. Upon the contrary, it is clear that his object was to make them as individuals the recipients of his bounty. Had, the institution of slavery continued to exist, they could not have taken as legatees, but the duty imposed upon the executor was one, the discharge of which the courts would have enforced. The testator did not change the provisions of his, will by reason of the adoption of the 13th Article of Amendment to the Federal Constitution. It spoke from the time of his death, and as appelleees were then free people, they were capable of taking as devisees and had the legal capacity to sue in their own name. The court below properly held that the provision for their benefit should be upheld, but we are of opinion that the judgment is eroneous in its details. The court reserves the power to make additional allowances to appellees, at its discretion. Under such a state of case it is impossible for the executor to determine what sum of money it will be necessary to retain, in order to be able to obey the future orders of the court.

*719
      *Davis, for appellant,*

*R. Mann, G. C. Lockhart, for appellees.*

A sum sufficient to yield annually the amount necessary to support comfortably the two appellees should be set apart. The sum should be fixed by the court. In case it becomes necessary to. make additional allowances, the court may direct the principal to be encroached upon. Appellees are not entitled to be supported in idleness, but should be required to assist in supporting themselves. Judgment *reversed*and the cause remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 25, 2011

d0718 

# Order

July 25, 2011

142977

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142977 COA: 302759 Wayne CC: 10-001461-FH DEVON LARAE PAGE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 30, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### MARKHAM v. NATIONWIDE MUT. FIRE INS. CO.

No. 163P97

Case below: 125 N.C.App. 443

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 June 1997.
**EXHIBIT
32**
 
 **STRATFORD
AMERICAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES**
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT**
 **TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Stratford American Corporation and
Subsidiaries (“the Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), we, Mel L. Shultz, President and Director of the Company, David H.
Eaton, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, and
Daniel E. Matthews, Controller, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/  Mel L.
      ShultzMel L. Shultz,President and Director
      May 16, 2005
 /s/  David H.
      EatonDavid H. Eaton, Chief Executive
      Officer and
      Chairman of the Board
      May 16, 2005
/s/  Daniel E.
      MatthewsDaniel E. Matthews, Controller,
      Secretary and
      Treasurer
      May 16, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





I, Patrick Freeman, Chief Executive Officer of Cordia Corporation (the Registrant) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period September 30, 2004 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report):

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By:/s/ Patrick Freeman



Patrick Freeman



Chief Executive Officer



November 12, 2004









*

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cordia Corporation and will be retained by Cordia Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Novellus Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 28, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Jeffrey C. Benzing, Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                      |  |     |  |                                                                                        
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 5, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Jeffrey C. Benzing                                                                 
|                      |  |     |  | Jeffrey C. Benzing                                                                     
|                      |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a 14(a)/15d-14(a) and

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Preston J. Shea, President and Chief Financial Officer of Dimensional Visions Incorporated, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Dimensional Visions Incorporated;

2. Based upon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based upon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting

Date:  March 7, 2005



/s/ Preston J. Shea

Preston J. Shea

President and Chief Financial Officer
9978.

#### Fountain *v.*The State.

Decided December 10, 1919.

Bloodworth, J.

The judgment originally rendered by this court in this ease (23 *Ga. App.*113, 98 S. E. 178), having been reversed by the Supreme Court (149 *Ga.*519, 101 S. E. 294), the former judgment of this court is vacated, and the judgment of the trial court is

*Reversed.*

*Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.*

*559Conviction of manslaughter; from Ben Hill superior court— Judge Crum. July 9, 1918.

*John W. Bennett, II. J. Quincey,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. B. Wall, solicitor-general, A. J. McDonald,*contra.
Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS (CHICAGO)

______________________________________________________________________________

BRITAIN ALEXANDER, CASE NO. 1:20-cv-04041

Plaintiff,

v. Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman

TRANS UNION LLC,

Defendant.

______________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND 

DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC

______________________________________________________________________________

Plaintiff Britain Alexander (“Plaintiff”), by counsel, and Defendant Trans Union, LLC 

(“Trans Union”), by counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that all matters herein between them have 

been compromised and settled, and that Plaintiff’s cause against Trans Union should be dismissed, 

with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

Respectfully submitted,

Date: November 9, 2020 /s/ Syed Haseeb Hussain (with consent)

Syed Haseeb Hussain, Esq.

Price Law Group APC

440 N. McClurg Ct., #803

Chicago, IL 60611

Telephone: (818) 600-5535

Fax: (818) 600-5435

E-Mail: syed@pricelawgroup.com

Counsel for Britain Alexander
Page 2 of 3

Date: November 9, 2020 /s/ Kari A. Morrigan

Sandra Davis Jansen, Esq. (IL #2780353)

Kari A. Morrigan, Esq. (IL #3470649)

Schuckit & Associates, P.C.

4545 Northwestern Drive

Zionsville, IN 46077

Telephone: 317-363-2400 

Fax: 317-363-2257

E-Mail: sjansen@schuckitlaw.com

 kmorrigan@schuckitlaw.com

Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC

Daniel O. Halvorsen, Esq. (IL #6225111)

TransUnion, LLC

555 West Adams Street

Chicago, IL 60661

Phone: (312) 213-9858

Fax: (312) 466-7986

E-Mail: daniel.halvorsen@transunion.com

Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, 

LLC
Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing has been filed electronically 

on the 9th day of November, 2020. Notice of this filing will be sent to the following parties by 

operation of the Court’s electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court’s 

electronic filing.

Syed H. Hussain, Esq.

syed@pricelawgroup.com

The undersigned further certifies that a true copy of the foregoing was served on the 

following parties via First Class, U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, on the 9th day of November, 2020

properly addressed as follows:

None.

/s/ Kari A. Morrigan

Sandra Davis Jansen, Esq. (IL #2780353)

Kari A. Morrigan, Esq. (IL #3470649)

Schuckit & Associates, P.C.

4545 Northwestern Drive

Zionsville, IN 46077

Telephone: 317-363-2400 

Fax: 317-363-2257

E-Mail: sjansen@schuckitlaw.com

 kmorrigan@schuckitlaw.com

Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
EXHIBIT 32

                 STRATFORD AMERICAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Stratford American Corporation and
Subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), we, Mel L. Shultz, President and Director of the Company, David H.
Eaton, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, and
Daniel E. Matthews, Controller, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/  Mel L. Shultz
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Mel L. Shultz, President and Director
August 14, 2003



/s/  David H. Eaton
-----------------------------------------------------------------
David H. Eaton, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
August 14, 2003



/s/  Daniel E. Matthews
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel E. Matthews, Controller, Secretary and Treasurer
August 14, 2003










                                       31
United States Department of Com

National Institute of Standards and Technolo

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For: 

Florida 

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international 

system of units (SI), documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully completed training and proficiency tests, documented calibration intervals, submitted a quality management system, and demonstratedsuitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate. The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope 

Mass Echelon II Mass Echelon III Volume Transfer, II 10 kg to 1 mg 500 kg, 250 kg 1500 gal to 5 gal 1000 lb, 500 lb 25 kg to 1 mg Volume Transfer, II LPG 25 lb to 0.001 lb 1000 lb to 0.001 lb 100 gal, 25 gal 8 oz to 0.03125 oz 8 oz to 0.03125 oz 

Weight Carts 5000 lb to 3000 lb Effective Date

___________Katrice LippNIST Office 

(Rev.: September 2021)