alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People v. William Lane.

*Confessions.*

In a prosecution for an attempt to murder, the respondent’s unsupported confession is not sufficient evidence of the *corpas delicti.*

Exceptions before judgment from Wayne.

Submitted October 19.

Decided October 20.

*341Information for attempt to kill and murder. Respondent was convicted.

Conviction set aside and prisoner discharged.

Attorney General *Jacob J. Van Riper*for the People.

*John Cx. Hawley*for respondent.

A prisoner ought not to be convicted on his extra-judicial confessions without proof *ali/unde*of the *corpus*delicti: 1 Greenl. Ev. § 217 ; Rosc. Crim. Ev. 39, n. 1; *State s. Turner*19 Ia. 144; *State v. Scott*39 Mo. 424; *Jenkins v. State*41 Miss. 582: *Priest v. State*10 Neb. 393 ; *Johnson v. State*59 Ala. 37; *State v. Knowles*48 Ia. 598 ; *Terr. v. McClin*1 Montana 394 ; *Nesbit v. State*43 Ga. 239 ; *Bergen s. People*17 Ill. 426; *People v. Rulloff*3 Park. Cr. 401; *People v. Hennessey*15 Wend. 147; *People v. Ah How*34 Cal. 218.

Cooley, J.

The respondent was convicted of an attempt to murder one Allen by administering morphine to him. The evidence that any such offence was committed was the respondent’s admission. The medical and other evidence in the case tended very strongly to show that the admission was unfounded. The defendant on the trial' explained his story by saying that he invented it to get up a sensation by way of advertisement for a firm of sensational doctors. The explanation was extraordinary, but on the evidence it is more credible than the confession on which respondent was convicted.

An unsupported confession should not be received as sufficient evidence of the- *corpus delicti. People v. Hennessey*15 Wend. 147; *Stringfellow v. State*26 Miss. 157; *States. Guild*5 Halsted 163. The respondent on the case submitted to the jury was entitled to an acquittal, and the conviction must be set aside and a discharge ordered

The other Justices concurred.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-13-00137- CV Roderick Lee Mitc hell, M.D., Appellant

v. Texas Medical Board, Appellee F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 126 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 3-0 0024 0, H ONO RAB LE TIM SULAK , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss his appea l. We g rant the motion and dismiss the appe al. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) .

__________________________________________ David Pury ear , J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton and Rose Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: June 26, 2013
#### Jack Doby *v.*State of Indiana.

[No. 3-375A45.

Filed October 29, 1975.]

*Nick Senak,*of Gary, for appellant.

*Theodore L. Sendak,*Attorney General, *Robert F. Colker,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

*369Per Curiam

Jack Doby, defendant, appeals from Ms conviction of assault and battery with intent to kill1 for which he was sentenced to the Indiana Department of Correction for an indeterminate term of two to fourteen years. Defendant contends the evidence was insufficient to show the necessary element of intent to kill.

We affirm.

The evidence most favorable to the State reveals that on May 26, 1973, David Jones and defendant were engaged in a dice game behind a pool hall in Hammond, Indiana when an argument erupted between them over a flve-dollar wager. After the game defendant left the premises only to return thirty minutes later armed with a shotgun. Defendant pointed the gun at David Jones and demanded the return of his five dollars. After Jones returned the money, defendant shot him.

Defendant was tried before the court without a jury and found guilty of assault and battery with intent to kill. Defendant admits assaulting Jones but denies any intent to kill him. In support of his claim defendant argues only one shot was fired from a range of ten feet to the buttocks rather than a more vital area of the body. Furthermore, defendant had the opportunity to fire a second shot, but instead left the scene.

Intent may be inferred from the deliberate use of a deadly weapon in a manner reasonably calculated to cause death. *Miller*v. *State*(1974), 159 Ind. App. 503, 307 N.E.2d 889; *Vaughn*v. *State*(1972), 259 Ind. 157, 284 N.E.2d 765; *Liston*v. *State*(1969), 252 Ind. 502, 250 N.E.2d 739; *Petillo*v. *State*(1950), 228 Ind. 97, 89 N.E.2d 623. Defendant testified he shot Jones in the buttocks without taking aim because that was all he could hit as Jones rolled under a table. Aimlessly discharging a shotgun shell into Jones from such a close range was reasonably calculated *370to cause death. *Stock*v. *State*(1969), 252 Ind. 67, 245 N.E.2d 335; See: *Kriete*v. *State*(1975), 263 Ind. 381, 332 N.E.2d 209. The fortuitous location of the wound resulted as much from poor markmanship as a design to inflict a limited injury-short of death. Whether or not defendant fired a second fatal shot is an equally ambiguous circumstance since his original intent to kill may have subsided after discharging the first round. If circumstantial evidence produces alternative inferences of guilt and innocence, we cannot reweigh the evidence on appeal and decide which should have prevailed upon the trier of fact. See: *Farno*v. *State*(1974), 159 Ind. App. 627, 308 N.E.2d 724. Substantial evidence of probative value existed from which the court could infer beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant intended to kill his victim.

Judgment affirmed.

Note. — Reported at 336 N.E.2d 395.

1

. IC 1971, 35-13-2-1, Ind. Ann. Stat. § 10-401a (Bums Supp. 1974).
Date:

Re: 

USDC Case Number:

Judge: 

The attached copy of the Notice of Appeal is being mailed to all parties pursuant to F.R.A.P.3(d). 

Circuit Rule 10 provides that the entire record be electronically accessible to the Court of Appeals. 

Counsel must ensure that Trial Exhibits to be included in the record which are not listed on the 

District Court docket and/or in the possession of the District Court Clerk are furnished to the Clerk 

on or before , together with an exhibit list. 

F.R.A.P. 10(b) requires that within fourteen (14) days of the filing of the Notice of Appeal, the 

appellant order a transcript of such parts of the proceedings not already on file which he/she deems 

necessary for the record. Should appellant order less than the entire transcript, he/she is required 

to file and serve on appellee a description of the parts he/she intends to order. Under such 

circumstances, appellee has fourteen (14) days after service within which to order any additional 

parts of the transcript. 

In the event it becomes necessary to supplement, modify, correct, or strike documents that are to 

be considered as part of the record on appeal, a court order must be issued and sent to the Court of 

Appeals.

Sincerely yours, 

Thomas G. Bruton, Clerk 

By: /s/ 

 Deputy Clerk 

Enclosure 

Rev. 06/20/2018 

Case: 1:20-cv-04176 Document #: 115 Filed: 04/04/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:685
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED) AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           731,047
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      14,688
<MORTGAGE>                                      93,563
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 919,774
<CASH>                                           9,339
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         351,070
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,495,162
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                966,363
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              5,271
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       4
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 85,050
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     429,317
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,495,162
<PREMIUMS>                                           0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             28,158
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              (1,717)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  45,068
<BENEFITS>                                      84,152
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     10,713
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           (32,219)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,367
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,945
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,422
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,422
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0








</TABLE>
Amendment to Employment Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
  
 AMENDMENT ONE TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 This Amendment One To Employment Agreement (the
“Amendment”), dated as of November 8, 2005, is an amendment to that certain Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of July 26, 2005, by and between i2 Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) and Michael J. Berry (the “Employee and CFO”), collectively referred to as the “Parties.” Undefined capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the
Agreement. 
  
 The parties hereby amend the Agreement as follows:

  
 Section 1.4.7 is hereby amended by deleting the fifth sentence
thereof and replacing it with the following: 
  
 “Until such
time as Employee’s home in Ohio is sold, the Company will pay the Employee an allowance of up to $6,000 per month for either (i) duplicate maintenance expenses associated with Employee maintaining his home in Ohio if Employee relocates to
Dallas prior to his home in Ohio being sold, or (ii) commuting expenses to and from Dallas from Employees home in Ohio. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Employee shall be responsible for all costs associated with maintaining his home in Ohio. The
monthly allowance shall be grossed up for any taxes payable by Employee associated with such allowance, if any.” 
  
 Other than as set forth above, the Agreement remains in full force and effect. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment on and as of the day and year first above
written. 
  

	
	i2 Technologies, Inc.
	
	 /S/    ROBERT C.
DONOHOO        


	 Robert Donohoo
 Senior Vice President and General Counsel

	
	Employee
	
	 /S/    MICHAEL J.
BERRY        


	 Michael J. Berry
 Executive Vice President of Finance and
 Accounting and Chief Financial
Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.4

Eastern Division

Ryan L Aprill, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04657

Honorable Martha M. Pacold

Anthony Aquila, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, March 25, 2022:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Maria Valdez: This matter has been referred

to Judge Valdez for discovery supervision solely related to the arbitration issue. Document

requests are to be served no later than 3/29/22, and discovery will close 6/3/22. The

parties are to file a joint status report on discovery progress no later than 5/6/22. Mailed

notice (lp, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Pan Am Financial Corp (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Guillermo Bron certifies in his capacity as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that to his knowledge: 

 

(a) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 

 

(b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto signed this Certification asof November 12, 2003. 

 

/s/ GuillermoBron 

Guillermo Bron 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
15.2





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” and to the use
of our auditors’ report dated March 22, 2007 on the financial statements of
SuperCom Asia Pacific Limited for the year ended December 31, 2006 in the Annual
Report (Form 20-F with file no. 000-50790) of Vuance Ltd. for the year ended
December 31, 2008 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission.


With
effect from May 1, 2009, our firm changed our name from BDO McCabe Lo Limited to
BDO Limited and we now practice under our new name
accordingly.




BDO
Limited


Certified
Public Accountants





29 June
2009
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 484 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 24, 1998.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 4103) making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 1999, and for other purposes. The first reading 
of the bill shall be dispensed with. Points of order against consideration of 
the bill for failure to comply with clause 2(l)(6) of rule XI, clause 7 of rule 
XXI, or section 306 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 are waived. General 
debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be considered 
for amendment under the five-minute rule. The amendments printed in the report 
of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as 
adopted in the House and in the Committee of the Whole. Points of order against 
provisions in the bill, as amended, for failure to comply with clause 2 or 6 of 
rule XXI are waived. During consideration of the bill for further amendment, the 
Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the 
basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in 
the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 6 
of rule XXIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman 
of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further 
consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any 
amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting 
on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without 
intervening business, provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on 
the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. Consideration of 
section 8106 for amendment under the five-minute rule shall not exceed one hour. 
At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall 
rise and report the bill, as amended, to the House with such amendments as may 
have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except 
one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 28
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, Northwest
Washington, D.C.  20549
Attn.:  Document Control

Re:  Oryx Energy Company Form 10-Q

We  are aware that our report dated May 4, 1998 on our review  of
the  interim condensed consolidated balance sheet of Oryx  Energy
Company  and  its  Subsidiaries as of March  31,  1998,  and  the
related  condensed  consolidated statements of  income  and  cash
flows  for  the  three  months ended March  31,  1998  and  1997,
included in this Form 10-Q, is incorporated by reference  in  the
following registration statements:
                                                Registration No.
On Form S-3 for:
  Oryx Energy Company $500,000,000 Debt
    Securities; Preferred Stock; and Common
    Stock                                           33-45611
  Oryx Energy Company $600,000,000 Debt
    Securities                                      33-33361
  Oryx Energy Company 7,259,394 shares of
    Common Stock                                    33-36799
  Oryx Energy Company $500,000,000 Debt
    Securities; Preferred Stock; and Common
    Stock                                          333-33373

On Form S-8 for:
  Oryx Energy Company 1992 Long-Term Incentive
    Plan                                            33-42695
  Oryx Energy Company Long-Term Incentive Plan      33-25032
  Oryx Energy Company Capital Accumulation Plan     33-24918
  Oryx Energy Company Equity and Deferred
    Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors   333-03075
  Oryx Energy Company Executive Variable
    Incentive Plan                                 333-03089
  Oryx Energy Company 1997 Long-Term
    Incentive Plan                                 333-26563

Pursuant  to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of  1933,  this
report  should  not  be  considered a part  of  the  registration
statement  prepared  or  certified by us within  the  meaning  of
Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


                              /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.


Dallas, Texas
May 4, 1998
EXHIBIT 15.20

 

 

 

May 5, 2006

 

Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc.

5330 East 31st Street

Tulsa, Oklahoma

 

We have made a review, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial information of Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. and subsidiaries for the periods ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, as indicated in our report dated May 5, 2006; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

 

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-79603, No. 333-89189, No. 333-33144, No. 333-33146, No. 333-50800 and No. 333-128714 on Form S-8.

 

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436 (c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

 

/s/  DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Tulsa, Oklahoma
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AP
HOLDINGS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4269
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45183
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2193)
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48799
<PP&E>                                          85682
<DEPRECIATION>                                  53395
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 210065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56628
<BONDS>                                        224041
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           34034
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            1
<OTHER-SE>                                   (117618)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   210065
<SALES>                                        125158
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               125158
<CGS>                                           95619
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95619
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23901
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11663
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5708)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6276)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6276)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0



</TABLE>