alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T YESI CA VENEGA S R OD RI GU EZ , P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 73224 A ge nc yN o. A 078- 084- 847 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 9, 2011 ** P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: B E E Z E R , T R O T T , an dR Y M E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Y es i caV enegas R od ri gu ez pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of the B IA ’ s deni alof her m ot i on t o r e ope n due t o i ne f f e c t i ve a s s i s t anc e of

c ouns e l . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on p u rsu an tt o 8 U . S . C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e rem an dt o th e B IA t o co n si d er th e effect, i f an y, of Mercado -Zazueta v. H older , 58 0 F . 3d 11 02 (9th C i r. 20 09 ), w hi ch w as deci ded 

# FI LED JU N 16 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

af t erthe B IA ’ s dec i si on . A dd i t i on al l y, i f app ropri at e, the B IA m ayconsi der w he the rR odr i gue z w a s pr e j udi c e d byhe rpr i orc ouns e l ’ s pe r f orm anc e a nd any o th er rel ev an ti ssu es. P E T I T I ON GR AN T E D; R E MAND E D.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1Section 302 Certification I, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that: I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing
distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered by
this annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 5;  1.
    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;  2.
    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to
the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, for
inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;  3.
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trustee
under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and the
annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the
reports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;
and  4.
    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trustee
and the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth in
the pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A. Date: March 29, 2005 By: /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale
Name: Ellen Z. Lamale
Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
Exhibit
      32.2






CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Patriot Scientific Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification
      is
      an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of Patriot Scientific
      Corporation does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
      knowledge:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                  April
                  19, 2006By:
                /s/ Thomas
                  J.
                  SweeneyThomas
                  J. Sweeney*Chief
                    Financial Officer*
Exhibit 10.1

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

AMOUNT:  $[   ]                             DATE:  [   ]

      FOR VALUE RECEIVED, BPR RESOURCES INC. ("Borrower") hereby promises to pay
to the order of MONTEX EXPLORATION, INC. ("Lender") the principal sum of [ ] ($[
]) DOLLARS. Payment in full, plus accrued interest of [ ] ([ ]%) percent shall
be made in lawful money of the United States, at the principal address of
Lender, or such other place as the holder of this Note may designate upon
demand.

      Borrower shall have the privilege without premium or penalty, at any time
and from time to time, of prepaying this Note in whole or in part.

      No partial prepayment shall postpone or interrupt the payment of the
remaining principal balance, all of which shall continue to be due and payable
at the time and the manner set forth above.

      Borrower agrees that a default shall occur hereunder in the event that
payment is not made upon demand and such default continues for a period of ten
(10) days from the date of demand therefor. After the expiration of such ten
(10) day period interest shall accrue on the unpaid balance due hereunder at a
rate of [ ] ([ ]%) percent, together with attorneys' fees for collection and
payment of the same, which sums may be enforced and recovered by the entry of
judgment on this.

      Borrower (and all endorsers, sureties and guarantors) waives presentment
for payment, demand, notice of demand, notice of nonpayment or dishonor, protest
and notice of protest of this Note, and all other notices in connection with the
delivery, acceptance, performance, default, or enforcement of the payment of
this Note; liability hereunder shall be unconditional and shall not be affected
in any manner by any indulgence, extension of time, renewal, waiver or
modification granted or consented to by Lender.

      Borrower shall pay the cost of any revenue, tax or other stamps now or
hereafter required by law at any time to be affixed to this Note or any security
documents executed in conjunction herewith, and if any taxes be imposed with
respect to debts secured by any such security documents or with respect to notes
evidencing debts so secured Borrower agrees to pay or to reimburse Lender upon
demand the amount of such taxes.

      The words "Lender" and "Borrower" whenever occurring herein shall be
deemed and construed to include their respective successors and assigns of
Lender and Borrower.

<PAGE>

      This instrument shall be construed according to and governed by the laws
of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower has duly executed this Promissory Note under
seal the day and year first above mentioned.


                                                BPR RESOURCES INC.
                                                BY:
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   NAME:
                                                   TITLE:
### NUMBER 13

- 13

- 00 644

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

IN R E OLD AMERICAN COUNTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE

COMPANY

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus and

Motion for Temporary Relief

.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Per Curiam Order

Relator, Old American County Mutual Fire Insurance Company, fi led a petition for

writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief in th e above cause on November 20,

2013. The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion for temporary relief,

is of the opinion that said motion should be granted. The motion for temporary relief is

hereby GRANTED, and the trial court proceedings are ordered STAYE D pending further

order of this Court, or until the case is finally decided. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.10(b)

(“Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is effective until the2

case is finally decided.”). T he Court requests that the real part ies in interest, Jose

Angel Cavazos, individually and as next friend to Sergio Javier Cavazos, and Lynette

Garza

, by and through counsel, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on

or before the expiration of ten days from the date of thi s order. See id. R. 52.4, 52.8.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the 21st

day of November, 2013

.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 26, 2012 

y0319 

Order 

 

March 26, 2012 

143273 

CITY OF RIVERVIEW, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 143273 

 COA: 296431 

CC: 09-0001000-MM 

STATE OF MICHIGAN and DEPARTMENT OF 

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 12, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 30, 2020

ON RECONSIDERATION EN BANC

NO. 03

- 19

- 00294

- CV

The City of Austin, Texas, Appellant

v.

Sayeed Anam, Individually and as Independent Administrator of The Estate of Zachary

Anam and Cara Ana m, Individually, Appellee

APPEAL FROM PROBATE COURT NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, TRIANA , KELLY AND SMITH
REVERSED AND RENDERED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE
DISSENTING OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA, JOINED BY JUSTICE SMITH;

DISSENTIN G OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appea l from the probate court ’ s o rder d enying the City of Austin ’ s p lea to the

j urisdicti on signed on Ap ril 12, 2019

. Appellant has filed a motion for rehearing, and having

reviewed the motion, the record, and the parties’ arguments, we grant the motion for

r e consideration en banc . The Court therefore withdraws its opinion and judgment from July 30,

2020

. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was

reversible error in the probate court’s order . Therefore, the Court reverses the proba te court ’ s

order denying the C ity ’ s plea to the j uris diction and render s judgment dismiss ing the Anams ’claims against the City

. A ppell ee shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and

in the court below.
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of CompX International Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Bowers, Vice Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Darryl R. Halbert, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)             The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)             The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











By: /s/David A. Bowers


David A. Bowers


Vice Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer











By: /s/Darryl R. Halbert


Darryl R. Halbert


Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller








Date: October 29, 2010











Note:  The certification the registrant furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  Registration Statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference, except as otherwise expressly stated in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1998
<CASH>                                             178
<SECURITIES>                                       371
<RECEIVABLES>                                      294
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,058
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           1,888
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (844)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              177
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       (960)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,450
<SALES>                                          1,613
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,046
<CGS>                                            1,303
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,303
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   885
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    74
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  28
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (244)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (244)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (244)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (6.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.89)
        

</TABLE>
Our election infrastructure remains a target for 

malicious actors. Many attacks begin with stolen 

user credentials, which may give the attacker 

access to election systems—and with that access, 

the potential to disrupt elections or undermine 

public confidence in them. These credentials 

are often obtained through phishing or brute 

force attacks, such as password guessing. Multifactor authentication (MFA) is a powerful tool 

to prevent many of these attacks. This guide 

provides an overview on how to deploy MFA to 

protect the election infrastructure. 

NIST 

Election Security Series

Implementing Multi-factor Authentication

OVERVIEW

MFA is a mechanism to verify an individual’s identity by 

requiring them to provide more than just a username 

and password. MFA requires a user to provide two or 

more of the following:

WHAT IS MULTI-FACTOR 

AUTHENTICATION?

HOW MFA SUPPORTS 

CYBERSECURITY OBJECTIVES

The recommendations in this guide can help 

satisfy the access control principle of the 

Voluntary Voting System Guidelines 2.0 and help 

achieve the desired access control outcomes from 

the NIST Cybersecurity Framework.

HOW TO IMPLEMENT MFA

Review current systems and applications –

Take inventory of all systems and applications 

used within the election infrastructure and 

the types of authentication mechanisms 

they use. 

Choose an appropriate authenticator – 

Prioritize implementing MFA on systems/

applications that provide access to sensitive 

data or administrative functions; choose MFA 

mechanisms that are both secure and usable.

Consider organization-wide single signon – Single sign-on systems support secure, 

centralized identity management and improve 

usability by enabling users to access multiple 

applications/systems after presenting their 

credentials.

Manage access to systems – Ensure that 

only authorized users have access to relevant 

systems, and limit or remove access as 

needs change or when suspicious behavior is 

detected.

Below are some steps election officials should 

consider when implementing MFA:

• Something the user knows – e.g., a 

password, pass phrase, or PIN 

• Something the user has – e.g., a physical 

token or a phone-based authenticator 

• Something the user is – e.g., a biometric, 

such as a fingerprint or retina patternHo

IMPORTANT RESOURCES

• Voluntary Voting System Guidelines 2.0

• NIST Cybersecurity Framework

• NIST Special Publication 1800-17, Multifactor 

Authentication for E-Commerce

• NIST Special Publication 800-63-3, Digital 

Identities Guidelines

For more information on this MFA guide and 

to view other guides in this series, visit: 

vote.nist.gov
Summary of Vintage Petroleum, Inc. Completion Bonus Program



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 SUMMARY OF 
 VINTAGE PETROLEUM, INC. 
 COMPLETION BONUS PROGRAM 
  
 Effective October 13, 2005, the Board of Directors of Vintage Petroleum, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), upon the recommendation of its Compensation Committee, established a completion bonus program for the Company’s Tulsa office employees, including certain executive officers, and expatriate employees who remain with the
Company through the closing of the merger of the Company with and into Occidental Transaction 1, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly-owned subsidiary of Occidental Petroleum Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
“Merger”). The completion bonus is payable at closing of the Merger, and, if the Merger does not occur, no completion bonuses will be paid. Completion bonuses will be paid according to a formula equal to the sum of (i) four months of
base pay plus (ii) four weeks of base pay per year of service with the Company. The following executive officers of the Company are not eligible to receive completion bonuses: Charles C. Stephenson, Jr., Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer, William C. Barnes, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and William L. Abernathy, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4158 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 4158

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 20, 2004

    Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To provide for the conveyance to the Government of Mexico of a 
 decommissioned National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ship, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF NOAA VESSEL WHITING.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Commerce shall convey to the 
Government of Mexico, without consideration, all right, title, and 
interest of the United States in and to the National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration vessel WHITING--
            (1) for use as a hydrographic survey platform in support of 
        activities of the United States-Mexico Charting Advisors 
        Committee; and
            (2) to enhance coordination and cooperation between the 
        United States and Mexico regarding hydrographic surveying and 
        nautical charting activities in the border waters of both 
        countries in the Gulf of Mexico and in the Pacific Ocean.
    (b) Operation and Maintenance.--The Government of the United States 
shall not be responsible or liable for any remediation, maintenance, or 
operation of a vessel conveyed under this section after the date of the 
delivery of the vessel to the Government of Mexico.
    (c) Deadline.--The Secretary shall seek to complete the conveyance 
by as soon as practicable after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (d) Delivery of Vessel.--The Secretary shall deliver the vessel 
WHITING pursuant to this section at the vessel's homeport location of 
Norfolk, Virginia, at no additional cost to the United States.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### The Liberty Folder Co., Appellee, *v.*Anderson et al., Appellants.

(No. 145

Decided January 19, 1949.)

*Messrs. Pickrel, Schaeffer & Ebeling*and *Messrs. Cummins <3 Boiler,*for appellee.

*Mr. Sidney G. Kusworm, Mr. D. F. Mills, Mr. Rodney R. Blake, Mr. Robert D. Touvelle*and *Messrs. Myers <3 Myers,*for appellants.

By the Court.

This cause is submitted on motion of plaintiff, appellee herein, to dismiss the appeal on questions of law and fact, and, also, to dismiss the appeal.

The court ordered the receivers to sell certain real estate in which the defendants, appellants herein, have an interest, “free and clear of dower interest of the defendant, Mary J. Anderson, in and to said real estate,” and further ordered that the claim of Mary *466J. Anderson arising by dower interest “be transferred to the funds received by said receivers from the-sale of said real estate with the same priority and effect as though they had attached to the original property.” From that order this appeal was taken.

Clearly, this is not a chancery matter and a trial *de novo*may not be had. *Eaton*v. *Robison,*47 Ohio App., 436, 192 N. E., 132.

The appeal on questions of law and fact will be dismissed. The court will retain the case for hearing-on appeal on questions of law. Section 12223-22, General Code. Under Section 11564, General Code, the court is required to make an order respecting the filing of a bill of exceptions.

It is claimed in the brief of plaintiff that a bill of' exceptions has been filed, although the transcript of the docket does not disclose it. If a bill has been filed in this court, an order is made to refile it in this court within three days from the date this entry is journalized. If the bill has not been filed, then the court orders such bill to be filed in conformity to Supplement to Rule VII effective January 1, 1949.- In all events,, the court orders assignments of error and briefs to be filed in conformity- to Supplement to Rule VII.

The motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that appellants failed to file their briefs within 50 days after filing notice of appeal as provided in Rule VII, is overruled. So long as this appeal stood as an appeal on questions of law and fact Rule VII had no application. Rule VII applies only to an appeal on questions of law.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Wiseman, P. J., Miller and Hornbeck, JJ., concur.