alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 226 (Monday, November 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 69848]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27765]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Savings and Loan 
Holding Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Home Owners' Loan Act (12 U.S.C. 1461 et 
seq.) (HOLA), Regulation LL (12 CFR part 238), and Regulation MM (12 
CFR part 239), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to 
become a savings and loan holding company and/or to acquire the assets 
or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a 
savings association and nonbanking companies owned by the savings and 
loan holding company, including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the HOLA (12 U.S.C. 1467a(e)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 10(c)(4)(B) of the HOLA (12 U.S.C. 1467a(c)(4)(B)). Unless 
otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the 
United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than December 19, 2014.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (William Lang, Senior Vice 
President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-1521:
    1. Cape Bancorp, Inc., and Cape Bank, both in Cape May Court House, 
New Jersey; to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Colonial 
Financial Services, Inc., and Colonial Bank Federal Savings Bank, both 
in Vineland, New Jersey.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 19, 
2014.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-27765 Filed 11-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Certification**

 

I, James A. Peers, certify that:

 

**1.          **I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to Annual Report on Form 10-K of GFI Group Inc.;

 

**2.          **Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date:   December 5, 2014    |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
|                        |   |
| /s/   JAMES A. PEERS        |   |
|                        |   |
| James   A. Peers            |   |
| *Chief   Financial Officer* |   |

 

----
Exhibit 31       Rule 13a-14(d) Certification



                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas G.  Lehmann,  a First Vice  President of  Washington  Mutual  Mortgage
Securities Corp., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of WaMu Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-CB1;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under
the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my knowledge and
the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as
disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that
agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated third parties acting as servicers
and sub-servicers:




None


Dated: March 29, 2005

                                     /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     Thomas G. Lehmann
                                     First Vice President
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4018

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to assure that immigrants 

do not have to wait longer for an immigrant visa as a result of a 

reclassification from family second preference to family first preference 

because of the naturalization of a parent or spouse. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2004

Mr. CASE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to assure 

that immigrants do not have to wait longer for an immigrant visa as a result of a reclassification from family 

second preference to family first preference because of 

the naturalization of a parent or spouse.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4018 IH 

1 SECTION 1. PREVENTING IMMIGRANTS FROM WAITING 

2 LONGER FOR IMMIGRANT VISAS AS A RESULT 

3 OF RECLASSIFICATION FROM FAMILY SEC4 OND PREFERENCE TO FAMILY FIRST PREF5 ERENCE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 203 of the Immigration 

7 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153) is amended by add8 ing at the end the following new subsection: 

9 ‘‘(i) ASSURING IMMIGRANTS DO NOT HAVE TO WAIT

10 LONGER FOR AN IMMIGRANT VISAAS A RESULT OF RE11 CLASSIFICATION FROM FAMILY SECOND PREFERENCE TO

12 FAMILY FIRST PREFERENCE.—Notwithstanding any 

13 other provision of law, in the case of a petition that has 

14 been approved to accord preference status under sub15 section (a)(2)(A) may be deemed to provide continued en16 titlement to status under that subsection in the case of 

17 any alien petitioner who is subsequently naturalized as a 

18 United States citizen, if a visa is not immediately available 

19 to the beneficiary under subsection (a)(1).’’. 

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

21 subsection (a) takes effect on the date of the enactment 

22 of this Act and applies to petitions filed before, on, or after 

23 such date, without regard to when an alien petitioner was 

24 naturalized as a citizen of the United States.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04699

Honorable John Z. Lee

TikTok Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, April 1, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: The status and motion hearing

set for 4/6/21 at 1:00 p.m. will take place via Microsoft Teams. The public may listen to

the hearing using the following: telephone call−in number 872−703−5321, conference ID

784837202#. All persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the

general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court

proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in court−imposed sanctions,

including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings,

denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court.

All participants should review the Court's standing order regarding telephone conferences

that is on Judge Lee's website, which can be found at:

https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge−.info.aspx?4Qf 5zc8loCI5U7rfMP9DHw==. To the

extent that counsel of record or members of the putative class would like to address the

Court at that time, they should contact the courtroom deputy as least 24 hours prior to the

hearing. Members of the Plaintiffs' Leadership Group and Defendant's Lead Counsel are

exempt from this requirement. Mailed notice (cn).

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 140 Filed: 04/01/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2673
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 601 Agreed to House (ATH)]

  2d Session
H. RES. 601

                Returning to the Senate the bill S. 361.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 15, 1998

Mr. Crane submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
                Returning to the Senate the bill S. 361.

    Resolved, That the bill of the Senate (S. 361) entitled the 
``Rhinoceros and Tiger Conservation Act of 1998'', in the opinion of 
this House, contravenes the first clause of the seventh section of the 
first article of the Constitution of the United States and is an 
infringement of the privileges of this House and that such bill be 
respectfully returned to the Senate with a message communicating this 
resolution.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     QUARTERLY  REPORT  ON FORM  10-QSB  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           499
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         3,755
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    4,586
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        20,249
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          19,791
<LOANS>                                       18,187
<ALLOWANCE>                                      143
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                49,293
<DEPOSITS>                                    39,714
<SHORT-TERM>                                       0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              649
<LONG-TERM>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                          73
<OTHER-SE>                                     8,857
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                49,293
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  979
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1,258
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 187
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               2,424
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             1,231
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,231
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          1,193
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     11
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1,134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  161
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       161
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                     156
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .28
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  3.40
<LOANS-NON>                                      227
<LOANS-PAST>                                       0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 138
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      6
<RECOVERIES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                143
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             143
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            0



</TABLE>
#### Chas. W. Pope *v.*J. W. Forsee.

Process — Service on Agent — Burden on Plaintiff.

The burden is on tbe plaintiff to show tbat tbe facts exists, to make tbe service of a summons on a person other than tbe defendant, sufficient under tbe provisions of tbe code.

APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON! COURT of COMMON PLEAS.

February 9, 1872.

*Barnett, Edwards & Harding, for appellant.*

*Caldwell, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

We cannot from the evidence in this case conclude that at the time the summons was executed on Forsee he was the agent of the Memphis and Arkansas River Packet company, and that the service upon him of appellant’s summons is such a service on an agent as is contemplated by the 80 *Section of the Civil Code.*

The burden is on appellant to show that the facts exist to make the service of the summons on a person other than the defendant sufficient under the provision of the code supra, and we think in this case the evidence is not sufficient.

Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed.*
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 587

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to the

seriousness of the national problems associated with mental illness and

with respect to congressional intent to establish a mental illness task

force.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 8, 1998

Mrs. ROUKEMA (for herself and Ms. KAPTUR) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with

respect to the seriousness of the national problems associated with mental illness and with respect to congressional intent to establish a mental illness task force.

Whereas mental illness is not a character flaw, but a tangible

and treatable illness as real as hypertension, cancer, or

heart disease;

Whereas great strides are being made in the diagnosis and

treatment of mental illness;

Whereas there remain gaping holes in the network of Federal, State, and local services designed to identify and

treat individuals with mental illness;
2

•HRES 587 IH

Whereas, more and more, America is witnessing violence resulting from untreated mental illness and a failed policy

of deinstitutionalization without any proper community

follow-up;

Whereas, all too often, we hear of situations where an individual with a mental disorder has not received adequate

treatment and has reacted violently and endangered himself or herself or, tragically, has taken the life of another;

Whereas one such situation occurred at the Capitol when Officer J.J. Chestnut and Special Agent John Gibson tragically lost their lives;

Whereas last year alone, over 1,000 homicides were directly

attributable to improperly treated mental illnesses;

Whereas, although the treatment of the mentally ill is primarily a function of the States, there is a significant

sharing of costs between the Federal Government and the

States for such treatment, and there are some joint responsibilities of the Federal Government and the States

for such treatment;

Whereas it is necessary to conduct an in-depth analysis of the

effectiveness of mental health block grants and of the

Federal prison costs attributed to mental illness; and

Whereas it is also necessary to conduct an in-depth analysis

of issues relating to reciprocity between the States: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that a temporary task force or advisory com3 mittee on mental illness should be established that would

4 be responsible for probing the serious dimensions of the

5 national problems associated with mental illness, including
3

•HRES 587 IH

1 determining the extent to which individuals with mental

2 illness are not receiving proper treatment and the extent

3 to which violence is resulting from the lack of such treat4 ment.

Æ
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1007

ELKEM METALS CO., AIMCOR, GLOBE METALLURGICAL, INC., and AMERICAN ALLOYS, INC.,

Plaintiffs,

and

CC METALS & ALLOYS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION,

Defendant,

and

FERROATLANTICA DE VENEZUELA, CHELIUBINSKI ELECTROMETALURGICAL WORKS, and KUZNETSK FERROALLOY WORKS,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

ASSOCIAO BRASILEIRA DOS PROD UCTORES DE FERROLIGAS E DE SILICO METALICO, NOVA ERA SILICON S/A,
COMPANHIA BRASILEIRA & COMPANHIA FERROLIGAS, ITALMAGNESIO S/A-INDUSTRIA E COMERCIO, RIMA INDUSTRIAL S/A, COMPAN HIA FERROLIGAS MINAS GERAIS – MINASLIGAS, and ABRAFE,

Defendants.Nancy A. Noonan , Arent Fox, LLP, of Washingt on, DC, argued for plaintiffappellant. With her on the brief were James H. Hulme and Matthew J. Clark

.

Julie C. Mendoza , Troutman Sanders LLP, of Wa shington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees Ferroatlantica De Venezuela, et al. With her on the brief were
Donald B. Cameron

, Jeffrey S. Grimson

, R. Will Planert

, Brady W. Mills , and Mary S. Hodgins

.

Marc A. Bernstein , Attorney, Office of the G eneral Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Wash ington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee
United States. With him on the brief were James M. Lyons , General Counsel, and
Andrea C. Casson , Assistant General Counsel.

Appealed from: United States Court of International Trade

Judge Richard K. EatonNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1007

ELKEM METALS CO., AIMCOR, GLOBE METALLURGICAL, INC., and AMERICAN ALLOYS, INC.,

Plaintiffs,

and

CC METALS & ALLOYS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION,

Defendant,

and

FERROATLANTICA DE VENEZUELA, CHELIUBINSKI ELECTROMETALURGICAL WORKS, and KUZNETSK FERROALLOY WORKS,

Defendants-Appellees,

andASSOCIAO BRASILEIRA DOS PR ODUCTORES DE FERROLIGAS E DE SILICO METALICO, NOVA ERA SILICON S/A,
COMPANHIA BRASILEIRA & COMPANHIA FERROLIGAS, ITALMAGNESIO S/A-INDUSTRIA E COMERCIO, RIMA INDUSTRIAL S/A, COMPA NHIA FERROLIGAS MINAS GERAIS – MINASLIGAS, and ABRAFE,

Defendants.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States Court of International Trade

in CASE NO 99-00628.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (BRYSON, LINN, and MOORE, Circuit Judges .)

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R.36

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: May 11, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Via Metropolitan /s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

April 24, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00549

- CV

Ernest MUNGIA

, Appellant

v.

VIA METROPOLITAN TRANSIT

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 380931

Honorable Tina Torres, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellee’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline to file Motion for Rehearing and

Motion for En Banc Reconsideration is GRANTED. Time is extended to May 23, 2014.

_________________________________ Cather ine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of April, 2014

.

___________________________________ K eith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to
the use of our reports dated (i) February 10, 1997 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Commodore Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries,
(ii) February 3, 1997 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Southern Star Communications, Inc., formerly known as Osborn Communications
Corporation, and (iii) March 5, 1998 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of SFX Broadcasting Inc. and Subsidiaries, all included in the
Registration Statement (Form S-1) and related Prospectus of Capstar Broadcasting
Corporation for the registration of shares of its common stock.

                                            ERNST & YOUNG LLP

New York, New York
March 26, 1998
#### Valerie FIELDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHWEST AIRLINES COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-50349.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Jan. 12, 2005.

Valerie Fields, San Antonio, TX, pro se.

J. Joe Harris, Bracewell & Patterson, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Valerie Fields moves to proceed in for-ma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. Southwest Airlines Company (“Southwest”) has moved to strike her appellate brief and to dismiss the appeal. Fields has in turn moved for permission to file an out of time reply to Southwest’s motion.

This court may authorize Fields to proceed IFP on appeal if she is unable to pay the costs of the appeal and the appeal is taken in good faith, *ie.,*the appeal presents nonfrivolous issues. Fed. R.App. P. 24(a)(1); *see Holmes v. Hardy,*852 F.2d 151, 153 (5th Cir.1988). Fields has failed to demonstrate that her appeal would involve nonfrivolous issues. Her motion for IFP is therefore denied and her appeal dismissed. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. All outstanding motions are denied as moot.

IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; ALL OUTSTANDING MOTIONS DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.