Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

25

WWVB: A Half Century of Delivering

Accurate Frequency and Time by Radio

Michael A. Lombardi and Glenn K. Nelson

National Institute of Standards and Technology,

Boulder, CO 80305

michael.lombardi@nist.gov

glenn.nelson@nist.gov

In commemoration of its 50th anniversary of broadcasting from Fort Collins, Colorado, this paper provides a history of the National 

Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) radio station WWVB. The narrative describes the evolution of the station, from its 

origins as a source of standard frequency, to its current role as the source of time-of-day synchronization for many millions of radio 

controlled clocks.

Key words: broadcasting; frequency; radio; standards; time.

Accepted: February 26, 2014

Published: March 12, 2014

http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

1. Introduction

 NIST radio station WWVB, which today serves as the synchronization source for tens of millions of 

radio controlled clocks, began operation from its present location near Fort Collins, Colorado at 0 hours, 

0 minutes Universal Time on July 5, 1963. Thus, the year 2013 marked the station’s 50th anniversary, a 

half century of delivering frequency and time signals referenced to the national standard to the United 

States public. One of the best known and most widely used measurement services provided by the U. S. 

government, WWVB has spanned and survived numerous technological eras. Based on technology that was 

already mature and well established when the station began broadcasting in 1963, WWVB later benefitted 

from the miniaturization of electronics and the advent of the microprocessor, which made low cost radio 

controlled clocks possible that would work indoors. This paper traces the history of WWVB, beginning 

with the earliest radio experiments conducted by NIST’s predecessor, the National Bureau of Standards

(NBS). It describes the station’s origins as a source of standard frequency, with only a small number of 

time users. It goes on to describe the station’s resurgence after a significant power increase in the 1990s, 

when it became a time-of-day synchronization source for mass produced radio controlled clocks. It then 

discusses recent advances that have made the station’s time signals easier to receive and more useful than 

ever before.

2. Early Radio Experiments and Frequency Measurements at NBS

 In some ways, the origins of the National Bureau of Standards (NBS), now known as the National 

Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), coincide with the origins of radio. NBS was founded in 

March 1901, just nine months before Marconi transmitted the letter “S” across the Atlantic by wireless 

telegraphy [1]. NBS scientists began conducting radio experiments shortly after the agency was founded, 

making perhaps their first contribution to the radio science literature in 1905, when Louis Austin published 
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

26 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

a paper about electrolytic detectors [2]. Austin went on to publish nearly 70 papers about radio propagation 

at the Bureau before his death in 1932 [1].

 NBS was, of course, a standards organization. As a result much of its early radio research was focused 

on developing measurement standards. John H. Dellinger, who joined the Bureau in 1907 and remained 

there until 1948, was a pioneer in the standardization and measurement of radio frequency. In 1911, 

Dellinger calibrated a wavemeter sent to NBS by a wireless company [3], a task that he later called “the 

first radio job of the National Bureau of Standards” [1]. Dellinger obtained the frequency reference for his 

wavemeter calibrations from a simple calculation of the resonance of an inductance-capacitance (LC) 

circuit [4]. During the next decade, frequency measurement technology based on wavemeters continued to 

improve under Dellinger’s guidance, due to better mathematical derivations for inductance and capacitance 

and better measurements of capacitors and their materials. However, the uncertainty of measurements made 

with these wavemeter instruments was never much better than 0.1 %.

 The lack of a way to accurately measure frequency was an obvious problem for the radio industry. Until 

it was solved, this was one of the great measurement problems of the 20th century. The new radio receiving 

sets being manufactured in the 1920s had to be able to accurately “tune” to the assigned frequency of the 

station that the listener wanted to hear, so the markings on the radio dial had to correspond to the 

frequencies actually being transmitted. More importantly, transmitters had to stay on their assigned 

frequency, because any station that strayed from its frequency assignment would interfere with other 

stations. By 1923, 570 U. S. broadcast stations had crowded into a 1000 kHz wide band and there was no 

satisfactory method for measuring the frequency of radio transmitters [1]. Dellinger explained the problem 

in an aptly titled paper called “Reducing the Guesswork in Tuning”:

“The waves used by the broadcasting stations are spaced 10 kilocyles apart (3 meters at a 

wavelength of 300 meters). Thus one station is on 990 kilocycles, another on 1000, and another 

on 1,010 kilocycles. A variation of the frequency of 1 per cent, for example, would be a variation 

of 10 kilocycles and could cause one station to be using exactly the wave that had been assigned 

to another. The whole success of American broadcasting is thus tied up with the placing of 

broadcasting stations on the correct frequencies to an accuracy approaching 99.9 per cent. 

Since receiving sets are now available by which an individual can hear the stations from all over 

the United States on the same night, the importance of this accuracy is apparent.” [5]

The “99.9 per cent” accuracy requirement, which wavemeters could barely meet, would soon become much 

more stringent. In 1927, the U. S. Congress formed the new Federal Communications Commission (FCC), 

which soon required all radio broadcasters to stay within 500 Hz of their assigned frequency. The 

requirement was tightened to 50 Hz in 1932 (5 × 10−5 at 1000 kHz) [1]. Even so, the problem of measuring 

radio frequency was largely solved by the invention of the quartz oscillator, which became commercially 

available in 1924 [6], and through the efforts of NBS, which had begun broadcasting standard frequency 

signals from a new radio station named WWV in 1923.

3. Radio Station WWV and its Impact on the Early Days of Radio

 Dellinger became the director of the radio section at NBS in 1919 [3]. In October of that year, the call 

sign WWV was assigned to NBS. The call letters have become synonymous with the broadcasting of time 

signals, but it is unknown why they were originally chosen or assigned [7]. Dellinger and his staff 

assembled WWV as an experimental radio station operating from the first floor of a building on 

Connecticut Avenue in Washington, DC in 1920 [3]. Throughout 1920 and 1921, the station was used for a 

variety of purposes, including the broadcasting of music concerts, and for the transmission of market news 

intended for farm bureaus and agricultural associations. However, it was eventually decided that the 

station’s primary purpose would be to transmit standard frequency signals, as a reference for other radio 

broadcasters. The stations first tests as a standard frequency station were conducted on January 29, 1923 

[7]. Figure 1 shows part of the original WWV transmitting antenna, located on the Bureau of Standards 

grounds in Washington, DC.
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

27 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Fig. 1. Original WWV antenna, Washington, DC.

 By March 1923, WWV was broadcasting standard frequencies, ranging from 75 to 2000 kHz on a 

weekly or monthly schedule, using a 1 kW transmitter. In April 1923, NBS published a broadcast schedule, 

Letter Circular 92, indicating that WWV was “conducting a series of transmissions of signals of known 

frequency (wave length) to be used as a basis for adjusting and calibrating radio apparatus” [8]. The radio 

world reacted favorably. In 1924, Hoy J. Walls, an NBS physicist who helped design the station, published 

an article in the amateur radio magazine QST that described the antennas and transmission equipment. 

According to a QST editor:

“Probably no radio station has ever rendered the American radio world so great a service as 

that of WWV in transmitting the standard wave signals. Before these signals began both 

broadcast and amateur waves were uncertain and often wavemeters disagreed violently. Since 

the signals began those in the East have been able to make precision calibration on their own 

wavemeters and to pass the information along to the West.” [9]

The phrase “those in the East” referred to NBS personnel who adjusted the WWV transmitter to the correct 

frequency by using a wavemeter that had been calibrated against the national standard wavemeter. This 

situation changed in 1927, when the first in a series of quartz oscillators became the national standard for 

frequency and was installed at the station. During the transmissions, the frequency of the transmitter was 

adjusted manually until no beat note was audible between the transmitter and the quartz standard. Within 

the span of a few years, quartz standards and better measurement techniques had improved the frequency 

accuracy by several orders of magnitude, from parts per thousands (10−3

) to better than one part per five 

million (2 × 10−7

) by the early 1930s [10].

 WWV moved to the high frequency (HF) bands, better known as shortwave, when it began a 5 MHz 

broadcast in 1931, and soon expanded to transmitting on multiple frequencies. It currently broadcasts 
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

28 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

continuously on five shortwave frequencies: 2.5, 5, 10, 15 and 20 MHz. WWV became a standard of time 

interval as well as frequency in 1937, when the station began transmitting pulses at one second intervals 

[11]. Ironically, the pulses were not held in phase with any time reference, because the United States Navy 

still served as the nation’s official radio time broadcaster. This changed in June 1944, when the 

Superintendent of the United States Naval Observatory (USNO) authorized the synchronization of the 

WWV time signals to those of the USNO, largely because the Navy had ordered the USNO to cut back 

time transmissions during World War II. As a result, WWV began sending time messages in telegraphic 

code every five minutes in October 1945 [12]. The iconic voice announcements of time, now known to 

nearly all who listen to shortwave radio, began on January 1, 1950 [13]. A sister station, WWVH, began 

operation in Hawaii in 1948 [14], adding its own voice announcements of time in 1964.

 WWV and WWVH are limited as a source of accurate frequency due to the instabilities of HF radio 

signals as they propagate across the Earth. When WWV began transmitting in the 1920s, the uncertainties 

of the wavemeters that were used to calibrate the station were much larger than the uncertainties introduced 

by the variations in HF radio propagation. This remained true in the early days of quartz oscillators.

However, as quartz oscillator technology continued to improve, it became evident that HF radio was 

limiting the accuracy of the frequency and time signals being delivered. This became more and more 

obvious as the years went on. By the 1960s, atomic oscillators were controlling the transmitted WWV and 

WWVH frequency to within 1 part per trillion (1 × 10−12), but the frequency recovered by users of the 

signals was much less accurate, typically by at least several orders of magnitude.

 The main problem with using a HF radio signal as a frequency reference was due to changes in the 

height of the ionospheric layer, which caused fluctuations in the transit period of the signal. These 

fluctuations produced a Doppler effect that made the received frequency higher or lower than the 

transmitted frequency. To reduce the Doppler effect, John Shaull of NBS wrote in 1950 that “high-accuracy 

measurements of frequency in terms of WWV should be made when ionospheric layer heights are likely to 

be most stable, i. e., with noon or midnight prevailing at about halfway between transmitter and receiver 

locations” [15]. However, even if these instructions were followed, it was difficult to recover frequency 

from WWV with an uncertainty of better than parts in 109

, unless the user was located very close to the 

station and could receive a ground wave signal [15], or unless measurements were recorded and averaged 

over multiple days [16]. These same limitations apply to WWV measurements today.

 Some nine decades after its first broadcast, WWV continues to serve both the radio and metrology 

communities, although it has changed locations several times. WWV moved from Washington, DC to 

College Park, Maryland in 1931, and then from College Park to Beltsville, Maryland in December 1932. A 

fire destroyed the station on November 6, 1940, but WWV was back on the air in an adjacent building just 

five days later. Congress provided the funds to construct a new station just 5 km to the south of the former 

site, which went on the air in January 1943 (Fig. 2). The station remained at the Beltsville location (later 

referred to as Greenbelt, Maryland) until 1966, when it was moved to Colorado [17] to share the site 

occupied three years previously by a new station called WWVB, as we shall see in the following sections.

4. CRPL and the Quest for Higher Accuracy Frequency and Time Signals

 In the summer of 1942, in the midst of World War II, the Interservice Radio Propagation Laboratory 

(IRPL) was established at NBS to serve the U. S. military. In 1946, when the war had ended, IRPL became 

the Central Radio Propagation Laboratory (CRPL), and no longer had a purely military function. In 1954, 

the CRPL was relocated from Washington, DC to the new NBS laboratories that had just been constructed 

in Boulder, Colorado [1].

 Upon its arrival in Boulder, one of the CRPL’s goals was to distribute the national standard of 

frequency at lower uncertainties than were possible through the shortwave broadcasts of WWV and 

WWVH. This would allow frequency standards, which were rapidly becoming more stable and accurate, to 

be measured faster, without the need to average data for days or weeks. Based on propagation research 

conducted at NBS and elsewhere, it was already known that this could be done by broadcasting a 

groundwave signal that traveled within the duct formed by the ionosphere and surface of the Earth, instead 

of relying on reflection from the ionosphere for propagation as the shortwave stations had done.
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

29 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Fig. 2. WWV transmitter building, Beltsville, Maryland, 1943.

Eliminating the error producing reflections from the ionosphere would greatly increase accuracy, but would 

require a lower transmission frequency [18].

 Other low frequency (LF, 30 to 300 kHz) and very low frequency (VLF, 3 to 30 kHz) radio stations 

designed for measurement and calibration purposes had already been built by the time CRPL moved to 

Boulder. The National Physical Laboratory (NPL) of the United Kingdom had installed a high-quality 

quartz frequency standard at the Rugby site operated by the British Post Office. In 1950, radio station MSF 

began broadcasting standard frequency signals from Rugby at a carrier frequency of 60 kHz. In 1954, the 

same frequency standard became the reference for the 16 kHz signals broadcast from the VLF station GBR, 

also located at the Rugby site [19, 20]. J. A. Pierce at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts 

received the GBR signal and made frequency measurements across a transoceanic path of 5180 km. The 

measurements were accurate to about 1 × 10−9 over an interval of just a few minutes. Pierce noted that these 

results were at least two orders of magnitude better than similar frequency measurements made over a short 

interval with WWV [19]. It was clear that LF radio had many advantages over shortwave for the purposes 

of distributing frequency. In 1956, NBS began its own LF radio experiments from an experimental radio 

station located at its new Boulder campus.

5. Experimental Radio Station KK2XEI

 On July 1, 1956, an unusual antenna located on the Boulder Laboratory campus, about a mile east of the 

mountain ridge known as the Flatirons, began radiating a 60 kHz carrier frequency that was referenced to 

the United States Frequency Standard. The antenna consisted of four 38 m tall poles arranged in a square, 
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

30 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

with an identical pole in the center (Fig. 3). Wires were run up the center pole, and connected at the top to 

other wires which terminated at each corner pole. A hut near the center pole contained tuning equipment.

The antenna was connected to a 2 kW transmitter 1000 m away. The control frequency was fed to the 

transmitter via a 500 m transmission line. The new experimental radio station was identified by the call 

sign KK2XEI [21]. W. D. George, then the acting chief of the Radio Standards Laboratory, initiated the 

plan for the experimental broadcasts. In May 1957, George presented a paper about KK2XEI at the 11th

Annual Frequency Control Symposium in Fort Monmouth, New Jersey [22]. George, who had begun his 

career at NBS in 1930, noted in his presentation some of the advantages that LF and VLF radio had over 

the existing HF signals being broadcast by NBS:

“In the 1930’s the NBS considered VLF before adoption of the plan to broadcast several high 

frequencies simultaneously. The principal reason for adopting the high-frequency system was 

the existence, at that time, of suitable receiving equipment in the hands of the public for the high 

frequencies and the lack of it for the low frequencies. It was recognized that the principal 

advantage of the low frequency would be freedom from transmission vagaries and that two 

outstanding disadvantages would be high antenna cost and possible interference from natural 

noise.

VLF may now be used; the only disadvantage appears to be the initial expense of an efficient 

antenna. Natural noise is overcome by reduced bandwidth receivers, coherent detectors, and 

integration type measuring techniques. Receivers can be built for either VLF or HF at 

approximately the same cost.

The principal reasons for studying a VLF standard frequency service are to give the users an 

opportunity to obtain a quicker and more accurate frequency and phase-reference than is now 

possible and to make measurements versus a reference which may be reliably received 

throughout the world.” [22]

Fig. 3. KK2XEI antenna in Boulder, Colorado.
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

31 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

 As an experimental station, KK2XEI was typically operated from 1530 to 2000 UTC Mondays through 

Fridays. Since the top-loaded monopole antenna was very small electrically at 60 kHz, it was inefficient 

and the radiated power was less than 2 W. Despite the low power, Pierce was able to receive KK2XEI at 

Harvard shortly after the station went on the air in the summer of 1956. By now, Pierce was adept at using 

the frequency recovered from incoming LF and VLF radio signals to measure local oscillators. Shortly 

afterwards, he began using the radio references to control the frequency of a local oscillator, perhaps the 

first examples of the disciplined oscillator instruments that meet the needs of so many frequency control 

applications today [23]. In January 1957, Pierce measured the received frequency of KK2XEI at Harvard 

by comparing it to the received frequency of GBR. The differences, recorded only on weekdays only when 

the station was operational, ranged from −0.3 to −3.7 parts in 109

. The received signal was simultaneously 

compared to the NBS standard in Boulder, with the frequency difference never exceeding 0.8 parts in 109

[22].

 In February 1958, Pierce’s laboratory at Harvard obtained a cesium standard from a company called 

Atomichron1

. Cesium standards represented the brand new “atomic clock” technology, which later became, 

as it remains today, the basis for the International System (SI) second, and Atomichron was the first 

company to sell cesium standards commercially [24]. NBS had already obtained two Atomichron standards 

[25], and one of them (Atomichron S106) was ordinarily used to calibrate a quartz oscillator that served as 

the frequency reference for KK2XEI. For a period of eight weeks (March-April 1958), an arrangement was 

made where the KK2XEI frequency was directly controlled by S106 for two days each week. This allowed 

the Atomichron at Harvard (S112) to be directly compared to S106 at NBS, by using KK2XEI as a transfer 

standard. During the last 10 days of the comparison (over a five-week period), the largest frequency 

difference recorded was 3 × 10−11. Pierce wrote, “Although it is perhaps a coincidence that the two 

Atomichrons were in such excellent agreement, the remarkably small scatter over a period of five weeks is 

an excellent testimonial to the stability of low-frequency transmission in the daytime” [26]. The experiment 

indicated that the previous LF experiments had probably been limited by the instabilities of quartz 

oscillators, and that the performance advantage that LF radio had over shortwave was even larger than 

previously believed. LF radio had established itself as the lowest uncertainty method for frequency transfer, 

a distinction it would hold until the second half of the 1970s, when it was surpassed by satellite systems.

 In March 1960, the call sign of KK2XEI was changed to WWVB [27]. Although the selection of the 

call sign WWV for the original NBS radio station is believed to have been arbitrary [7], the “B” in WWVB 

likely was intended to designate the location of the original transmitter site in Boulder, just as the “H” in 

WWVH likely was intended to designate Hawaii. WWVB would remain in Boulder as an experimental 

station for several more years, while NBS staff worked on the design of a new VLF station at 20 kHz, and 

on the acquisition of a permanent site for all of its radio stations. 

6. WWVL: The Quest for a Global Transmitter

 The success of Pierce’s research using the 16 kHz GBR standard frequency broadcast from Rugby, 

England led him to believe that a single transmitter could provide accurate frequency information to the 

entire world. The signal would have to be in the VLF band where attenuation was much less of a problem 

than at the 60 kHz frequency of WWVB. Even so, the station would still require a lot of power. Pierce 

estimated, for example, that about 500 kW of radiated power from an antenna with an effective height of 

200 m would be required to exceed natural atmospheric noise levels at all locations (a field strength of 

about 10 μV per meter) and provide a standard frequency service to the entire world at 20 kHz. At 10 kHz, 

the power required would be considerably less, only about 20 kW [23].

 NBS staff members embraced Pierce’s idea of a single VLF transmitter that provided worldwide 

coverage. In his 1957 presentation, George had indicated the likely frequency of such a transmitter would 

 1 Certain commercial equipment, instruments, or materials are identified in this paper to foster understanding. Such identification does 

not imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor does it imply that the materials 

or equipment identified are necessarily the best available for the purpose.
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

32 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

be 10 kHz [22]. However, a comprehensive 1958 study by A. D. Watt and R. W. Plush of the NBS Boulder 

laboratories examined a variety of factors other than radiated power requirements, including an analysis of 

the carrier-to-noise ratios required for accurate frequency measurements, and recommended the use of

20 kHz [28]. As a result, plans were made for another experimental station near Boulder, this one operating 

at 20 kHz.

 NBS had previously installed a valley-span antenna in Fourmile Canyon approximately 18 km from 

Boulder (near the community of Sunset, Colorado) for VLF receiving experiments. After modifications for 

broadcasting, this large antenna consisted of a 1036 m copper-coated steel cable suspended from two 

mountain peaks on opposite sides of the canyon. The cable weighed more than one ton. Another cable 

extended down from the center of the cross-span about 275 m to the canyon floor [29]. Figure 4 shows an 

artist’s view of the WWVL antenna, looking toward the west. Despite its large physical size, the antenna 

was quite small electrically, because the wavelength at 20 kHz is 15 km. An 8 kW transmitter was used, but 

the radiated output power was only about 14 watts, an efficiency of only 0.18 % [30].

Fig. 4. Artist’s conception of the original WWVL antenna in Fourmile Canyon, west of Boulder.

 The experimental station began transmitting for six hours per day on April 5, 1960 with the call letters 

WWVL. The “L” in the call sign did not refer to the station’s location, but was probably intended to refer, 

along with the “V” that preceded it, to “very low” frequency. In June 1960 the broadcasts became 

continuous, except for periods during the “dark” phase of the moon when another project used the antenna 

during the nighttime hours. Under ideal conditions, the signal could travel a great distance. Intermittent 

reception was reported as far away as New Zealand [30].

7. Selection of a Permanent Site for WWVB, WWVL, and WWV

 By 1960, it was estimated that more than 50 organizations within the United States were using the 

experimental WWVB broadcasts, and the signals were considered reliable and accurate enough for some 

organizations to cancel their plans to acquire expensive atomic frequency standards [29]. The success of the 
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

33 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

experimental broadcasts at both 60 kHz and 20 kHz had made it obvious that a broadcast facility was 

needed where higher power transmission equipment could be permanently installed, and the search had

begun for a suitable location. It was clear that the Boulder site where WWVB was currently located was too 

small for a high power station. It was also too close to the Rocky Mountains, which could affect the signal 

path to the west.

 A memorandum of site considerations, dated July 6, 1959, and updated several times during the 

following months, listed the requirements for the new home of WWVB and WWVL. The first approach 

was to study maps of U. S. government and state owned land. About 20 possible sites were considered, but 

none were found suitable due to various problems, including unlevel ground, the risk of cyclones, poor 

ground conductivity, or a location that was considered to be too far away from the Boulder laboratories.

Ten more sites located in a north-east-south quadrant, with the Boulder laboratories in the center, were then 

considered, but the soil conductivity of these sites was considered to be poor. Finally, seven sites north of 

Fort Collins, Colorado were considered. This region has numerous lakes and reservoirs, which was 

favorable for good soil conductivity. The investigated sites were in the optimum region between the 

mountains to the west and the cyclone region of the eastern Colorado plains. The conditions were very 

favorable, and it was likely determined well before the end of 1959 that the area north of Fort Collins 

would become the home of the new NBS radio stations.

 By systematic evaluation, one of the seven sites north of Fort Collins was selected in December 1960.

The selected site was a tract of farmland bordered by two reservoirs, North Poudre Reservoir 6 and 

Greenwalt Lake. The ground conductivity of the soil at the site was unusually high, which is desirable for 

the grounded portion of large antenna systems [31]. The site was located some 10 km north of Fort Collins, 

and about 80 km north of Boulder, which was considered far enough away to prevent the strength of the

20 kHz and 60 kHz signals from interfering with Boulder radio experiments. However, it was considered to 

be near enough to Boulder for the driving distance between the station and the laboratory to be reasonable, 

and for the station frequency to be controlled by or phase locked to the Boulder standard [32].

 The land area was approximately 380 acres. It was purchased in two parcels, a 365.7 acre parcel 

obtained through eminent domain from Milo and Lucille Sabin at a cost of $72,500 and a 14.25 acre site 

obtained in the same fashion from Willard Stovall at a cost of $3,500. Although construction on the site 

began in the summer of 1962, the final settlement of the land purchases was not completed until March 

1963.

 The land cost represented less than 20 % of the total cost of building the initial configuration of the 

stations. Congress appropriated $325,000 for the stations in 1961, and additional funding of about $100,000 

was provided by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) [33].

8. The Global 20 kHz Transmitter: A Plan That Never Materialized

 During the acquisition and planning stages for the new Fort Collins site, the grand vision of providing a 

worldwide time and frequency service from just one station persisted. According to this plan, the first 

stations activated at the Fort Collins site would be known as the “pilot stations”, proof of concept 

experiments that would pave the way for the next step, a massive eight-tower “triatic” antenna array with a 

500 kW transmitter. The planned station would broadcast a 20 kHz frequency standard that could be 

received worldwide. The antenna was a system of cables suspended from eight 183 m high self-supporting 

towers, based on the design of an existing U.S. Navy antenna array in Annapolis, Maryland. The projected 

efficiency of the antenna was 33 %. A photograph of a model of the proposed station is shown in Fig. 5 

[34].

 The plans for the new site also included new facilities for WWV; the HF antennas were shown on the 

model as short sticks (lower right of Fig. 5). An engineering drawing showing the locations of the antennas 

is shown in Fig. 6. However, fiscal, political, and technical circumstances intervened, and the large VLF 

antenna array was never built. 
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

34 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Fig. 5. Model of the Fort Collins, Colorado radio station, with the proposed high-power VLF time and frequency antenna on right.

Fig. 6. Fort Collins antennas, including the proposed high power VLF station antenna.

9. The Original Station Design and the First Broadcasts from Fort Collins

 Plans did move forward on the pilot stations, which would become the main broadcast facility. The 

stations were designed by W. W. Brown, an antenna engineer who had been heavily involved in the 

selection of the Fort Collins site. Brown had a distinguished 44-year career designing LF and VLF 

transmission systems at the General Electric Company before retiring and coming to NBS in 1958, where 

he would retire for a second time in 1965. It is interesting to note that a 1926 paper by Brown shows an 

antenna that bears a remarkable resemblance to the antennas that would be built in Fort Collins [35].
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

35 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Figure 7 shows Brown (left), Richard Carle (standing, middle), and Al Morgan (right), discussing the 

station plans in Boulder shortly before the opening of the Fort Collins site. Carle was the original engineerin-charge (EIC) of the Fort Collins site, and Morgan was the chief of the radio broadcast section.

Fig. 7. NBS staff members in Boulder discussing plans for the new stations in Fort Collins (from left to right, W. W. Brown, Richard 

Carle, and Al Morgan).

 While Brown was working on the antenna system design, the U.S. Navy was also building a new radio 

station, in Cutler, Maine, along the Atlantic coast. This station, soon to become the most powerful in the 

world, had two huge antennas designed for operation in the VLF range. The antennas each consisted of six 

diamond-shaped arrays arranged in the shape of a radial star, delivering efficiencies previously unheard of 

in VLF stations and fed by a two-megawatt transmitter. A view of the Cutler station is shown in Fig. 8. The 

station commenced operations in 1961 with the call letters NAA. In both Brown’s earlier paper [35] and the 

NAA design [36, 37] the salient characteristic is the diamond shape of the individual antenna “panels”.

This configuration would greatly influence Brown’s antenna design for the new NBS stations.

 Brown’s plan called for two diamond shaped antennas ranging northwest to southeast across the 

property. The eight guyed steel towers, four for each array, would be 122 m tall. Each array would be

579 m long and 229 m wide. The panels, known in antenna parlance as capacitance hats or top hats, were 

made of eight aluminum cables running the length of the diamond. Across the center of the diamond from 

side to side ran a larger cable, spacing the longitudinal cables along its length. The panels were insulated 

from the grounded towers, and connected to concrete counterweights at the base of each tower. Each array 

had a vertical down lead that dropped from the center of the panel to a helix house, which contained 

antenna matching equipment and the connection to the transmitter. Figure 9 shows one of the helix houses 

during its construction, with Brown standing in the left foreground of the photograph.
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

36 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Fig. 8. U.S. Navy radio station NAA, Cutler, Maine.

Fig. 9. The construction phase of one of the helix houses at the Fort Collins site.
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

37 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

 Buried underneath the arrays was a network of wires making up the grounded portion of the antenna, 

called the ground plane. The south antenna array would be used for the WWVB broadcast, and the north 

array for WWVL [7, 38]. The radiated efficiency of the antennas was estimated as 2.2 % at 20 kHz, and 

24.6 % at 60 kHz [39]. An artist’s depiction of the two antennas made during the early days of their 

operation is shown in Fig. 10; they can also be seen on the left side of the model in Fig. 5, and marked as 

“Pilot Station” in Fig. 6. Note that Fig. 10 does not accurately show the orientation of the antennas with 

respect to each other (the south antenna appears offset to the west), but Fig. 6 does show the correct 

orientation.

Fig. 10. Drawing of WWVB and WWVL antenna arrays.

 Construction began on the stations in July 1962 [33, 40], with placement of concrete anchors and 

foundations for the towers. The towers themselves were next, shipped in sections by rail to the nearby town 

of Wellington, Colorado and transported to the site by truck. The antenna cables and fittings arrived as well 

as the insulators and guy cables. Figure 11 shows various antennas and parts arranged on the ground prior 

to assembly. Figure 12 shows the view of both antenna arrays from the top of Tower 1. Careful inspection 

of the photograph will reveal one of the helix houses (center, near bottom) and the radial lines of the 

ground plane. An even closer inspection will reveal that there are nine towers in the photograph including 

the one in the foreground, even though only eight were included in the north and south arrays. The extra 

tower, known as Tower 9, was the standby antenna for both WWVB and WWVL and stood about 22 m 

taller than the other towers. Built in 1964, Tower 9 was disassembled and removed from the site in the 

early 1980s by a private contracting company. Sadly, a young workman was killed during the demolition 

process when a portion of the tower collapsed.
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

38 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Fig. 11. WWVB antenna parts on the ground prior to assembly, 1962.

 

Fig. 12. View of the antenna array from the top of Tower 1.
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

39 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

 The original transmitters used at the new site were several refurbished and heavily modified ex-military 

transmitters, formerly known as model AN/FRT-6. Both WWVB and WWVL used versions of these 

transmitters.

 The buildings and facilities in Fort Collins were completed in July 1963. The original building that 

housed the WWVB transmitters is shown in Fig. 13. Ironically, in mid-June, shortly before the completion 

of the new site, much of the equipment of the experimental WWVB station in Boulder was destroyed by a 

fire caused by a lightning strike on the antenna (Fig. 14). This event took the experimental 60 kHz station 

permanently off the air slightly earlier than anticipated [41].

Fig. 13. The original WWVB transmitter building in Fort Collins, completed in July 1963.

Fig. 14. The experimental WWVB station in Boulder was destroyed by lightning shortly before the Fort Collins station went on the 

air.
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

40 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

 Like Yankee Doodle Dandy, the new WWVB station was “born on the fourth of July”. The station 

began broadcasting from its new facilities at 5:00 PM local time on July 4, 1963 (0000 hours, July 5, 

Coordinated Universal Time) [27, 41]. The original radiated power was 4 kW. WWVL began transmissions 

in August 1963 (the exact date appears to be unpublished but may have been August 6th), radiating 500 W 

[42]. Figure 15 is a photograph of David Andrews and Robert Oase of NBS tuning the WWVB antenna to 

resonance about two weeks after the station went on the air. Equipment was later installed that tuned the 

antenna automatically.

Fig. 15. David Andrews (left) and Robert Oase (right) tuning the WWVB antenna.

 Special dedication ceremonies for the new radio stations were held on August 13, 1963 at the NBS 

Boulder Laboratories, during the Symposium on Ionospheric Propagation of Low Frequency Waves. J. M.

Richardson, the chief of the NBS Radio Standards Laboratory, chaired the dedication session, and NBS 

director A. V. Astin spoke. The dedication was followed by a series of technical talks about the new 

stations, after which buses took the symposium attendees to Fort Collins for a tour of the new site [32].

 In July 1964, it was announced that WWV would be moved from Maryland to Fort Collins to share the 

WWVB/WWVL site, and Congress appropriated some $970,000 to provide for the move. WWV went on 

the air from Fort Collins on December 1, 1966 [17]. Figure 16 shows a map of the station site as it remains 

today, showing the eight WWVB towers in the north and south antenna arrays, the locations of the separate 

transmitter buildings for WWVB and WWV, and the locations of the WWV antennas.

10. WWVB Adds a Time Code

 For approximately two years after going on the air in Fort Collins, WWVB’s only purpose was to serve 

as a standard frequency and time interval station. No time-of-day information was broadcast. The station 

broadcasted a 60 kHz sine wave that was largely unmodulated, with the exception of five cycles (83.3 μs 

duration) of 1000 Hz double-sideband amplitude modulation that were used to mark seconds [43]. In spite 

of the second markers the primary application for the station was, as it would remain until the 1990s, to 

serve as a frequency reference.
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

41 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Fig. 16. Map of the WWVB and WWV site, showing locations of antennas and transmitter buildings.

 A digital time code that would allow receivers to recover the time-of-day was added to the WWVB 

broadcasts on July 1, 1965. The time code, designed by NBS engineer David Andrews [44], initially had 

very few users, although it would eventually make low-cost radio controlled clocks commonplace (Sec.

16). Although shortwave station WWV had added a time code in 1961 [45], WWVB was the first LF 

station to add a digital time code. The German station DCF77, which went on the air in 1959, did not add 

its widely-used time code until 1973 [46].

 The time code transmitted information in a format known as binary coded decimal (BCD) where four 

binary digits (bits) were required to transmit one decimal number. Bits were modulated by simply lowering 

and raising the power of the 60 kHz carrier. The carrier power was dropped at the start of each second to 

send an on-time marker (OTM) for clock synchronization. Originally, the carrier power was dropped by

10 dB [47]. It remained this way until January 1, 2006, when the depth of the carrier phase modulation was 

increased to 17 dB [48] based on a suggestion from Casio, a manufacturer of radio controlled clocks. The 

increase in the power drop made the OTM easier to detect.

 After the OTM is sent, the power is held low for 0.2 s to send a binary zero or for 0.5 s to send a binary 

one. This form of modulation is sometimes called amplitude shift keying, but is more properly referred to 

as pulse width modulation by reduced carrier transmission. This is because the information contained in the 

signal is demodulated by looking at the pulse widths (duration) rather than by looking at the amplitude. The 

bits are sent at the glacial rate of one bit per second, and a full minute is required to send a complete time 

code. The time code format (Fig. 17, [49]) has changed only slightly throughout the years, and is still 

utilized by nearly all WWVB products to recover time-of-day. However, an enhanced phase modulated 

time code was added to the broadcast in 2012 without disturbing the “legacy” time code, as is discussed 

later in Sec. 17.
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

42 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Fig. 17. The WWVB “legacy” time code.

 WWVB has seldom been used for precise time synchronization applications (at a level better than

100 μs, or six 60-kHz cycles), largely because the exact OTM is not easy for receivers to identify [7].

However, in 1968 Andrews published a study where the received WWVB OTM was measured in Boulder.

The uncertainty limitation for time transfer was identified as ±40 μs, or about ±2.5 cycles [50].

11. WWVL Goes Off the Air

 After the plans to develop a worldwide frequency station at 20 kHz were scrapped (Sec. 8), the interest 

in WWVL waned. To be sure, the plans did not go away immediately – they were discussed well into the 

1960s. However, as engineer John Milton noted in an NBS report of WWVB and WWVL field strength 

measurements – “In 1968, it became apparent that the financial resources of NBS would not support such a 

venture. Also work in the timing area by other government agencies in the fields of LF and VLF 

broadcasting, satellites and portable clocks made any NBS effort toward a higher power station 

scientifically questionable. It was then decided that NBS would officially withdraw ....” [51].

 Milton was undoubtedly referring to the LF and VLF radionavigation systems like LORAN-C and 

Omega that were by this time widely used as frequency and time references and which each had a large 

network of stations that gave them an advantage over the single Fort Collins site. Satellites were an even 

larger factor in the decision to stop pursuing a worldwide VLF station. Satellite signals could cover large 

areas of the Earth with very little power, and the signal paths were exceptionally stable. NBS had already 

begun time synchronization experiments via satellite at the time of Milton’s report [52].

 The radiated power of WWVL, which originated at 500 W at the Fort Collins site, was increased to

2 kW in 1966 [47] but remained there for the lifetime of the station. Within a few years, NBS began 

referring to the station as experimental, rather than as a continuous service. The station was used to study 

VLF time synchronization capabilities by utilizing a time-shared multi-frequency concept to conserve 

bandwidth. On November 4, 1969 the station began alternating between frequencies of 20.0 kHz, 19.9 kHz, 

and 20.9 kHz every 10 seconds [53]. However, users were informed that the format and frequencies were 

subject to change to meet the needs of the particular experiment being conducted. Users were encouraged 

to “explore alternative solutions to their needs” and the station operation became intermittent on January 1, 
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

43 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

1972 [54]. WWVL was permanently turned off on July 1, 1972, less than nine years after going on the air 

in Fort Collins.

 The north antenna array used for WWVL was left standing. It would remain essentially unused until the 

1990s, when it was refurbished and became part of the WWVB transmission system (Sec. 15).

12. Controlling WWVB Frequency and Time

 The purpose of WWVB has always been to deliver, by radio, the U. S. national standards of frequency 

and time to the general public. As previously noted, the actual national standard is located in Boulder, some 

80 km away from the Fort Collins site. At this point in our narrative, it is worthwhile to describe the 

various methods used since 1963 to keep the station clock in Fort Collins in close agreement with the 

reference clock in Boulder.

 The original method of controlling the WWVB frequency in Fort Collins was to use a phase-locked 

servo system where a control signal was broadcast from Boulder and received at the station site. This 

method was devised by Chesley Looney of NASA [55] and was first implemented by NBS to control the 

frequency of WWVL while it was located in Sunset, Colorado. The 20 kHz signal from WWVL was 

received in Boulder, where it was compared to the national standard. Then, a 50 MHz frequency modulated 

signal was sent from a Boulder transmitter back to the station site. The signal from Boulder contained the 

information necessary to correct the phase. When received at the station, it was used to drive a mechanical, 

two-phase servo motor that “turned the gears” and adjusted the station’s oscillator, keeping it within one or 

two parts in 1011 of the national standard [56].

 When the system was implemented in Fort Collins, the signals of both WWVL and WWVB were 

received and measured in Boulder. When the 50 MHz signal transmitted from Boulder was received in Fort 

Collins it was split into three components – the reference phase information, the 20 kHz phase error 

information, and the 60 kHz phase error information [42]. Figure 18 shows a photograph taken at the 

dedication ceremony of the 40 ft antenna mast, topped by a Yagi antenna, that was used to receive the

50 MHz signal. The group of scientists at the bottom of the mast included NBS director A. V. Astin. Figure 

19 shows the 50 MHz transmitting antenna on the roof of the NBS laboratories in Boulder. It is interesting 

to note that during this era the LF and VLF signals from Fort Collins, phased locked to Boulder, were 

received in Hawaii and Maryland (then the home of WWV) and used to control the frequency of the 

shortwave stations WWVH and WWV [27].

 The continuous phase locked loop between Boulder and Fort Collins worked fairly well most of the 

time, but its performance was limited by short term phase errors due to sky wave interference. Thus, a 

replacement method was sought [57]. A new method, implemented in May 1968, involved common-view 

observation of television signals, a method first described by Tolman in Czechoslovakia [58]. The NBS 

implementation of this method utilized the reception of television signals broadcast from Lookout 

Mountain, which overlooks the city of Golden, Colorado south of Boulder. These signals provided 

television coverage to the entire Denver, Colorado metropolitan area. Television sets at Boulder 

laboratories and the radio station site were tuned to the same television program being broadcast from 

Lookout Mountain. Time interval counters in both Boulder and Fort Collins were started with pulses from 

the local clock, and stopped with pulses extracted from the television broadcast. Then, the difference 

between the Boulder reading and Fort Collins were compared to each other. If the Boulder clock agreed 

with the Fort Collins clock, the difference between the two readings would equal the difference between the 

two path delays, (TV delay to Boulder) – (TV delay to Fort Collins), which was about 63.5 μs. If the Fort 

Collins clock was ahead of or behind the Boulder clock, it was manually adjusted until the desired delay 

value was reached. This method allowed the Fort Collins clock to be continuously held to within about

±0.5 μs (500 ns) of the national time standard [57, 59, 60].
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

44 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Fig. 18. Antenna used to receive phase corrections from Boulder. Photograph taken at WWVB / WWVL station dedication, August 

13, 1963.

Fig. 19. A 50 MHz transmitting antenna on the roof of the NBS laboratories in Boulder. This antenna was used to send phase 

corrections to the radio stations in Fort Collins.
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

45 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

 Common-view television measurements were eventually replaced by higher accuracy common-view 

measurements via Global Positioning System (GPS) satellites, a technique that NBS helped pioneer shortly 

after the launch of the first GPS satellite in 1978 [61, 62]. The Boulder clock and the Fort Collins clock 

were each compared to the same GPS satellite at the same time. The Boulder and Fort Collins 

measurements were exchanged by computers connected to telephone modems, and in later years, by 

computers connected to the Internet. The difference between the two measurements was the difference 

between the Boulder and Fort Collins clocks, as the clock onboard the GPS would fall out of the equation.

This method made it routine to keep the cesium clock at the station within ±0.1 μs (100 ns) of the national 

time standard in Boulder, and to agree to within 1 × 10−13 in frequency.

 Common-view GPS measurements are still used to compare Fort Collins time to Boulder, but an 

ensemble time scale that outputs the weighted average of four cesium clocks was installed in Fort Collins 

and became the reference for WWVB in February 2005 [63]. The stability of the time scale now allows the 

station time to be typically kept within ±0.02 μs (20 ns) of the national time standard in Boulder, and to 

agree to within 1 × 10−14 in frequency.

13. Scientific Applications of WWVB

 In the first few years after WWVB and WWVL moved to Fort Collins, the new stations were routinely 

utilized by NBS personnel for scientific and research purposes. Attempts were made to utilize the stations, 

in particular WWVL, for international comparisons of atomic clocks [64]; although LORAN-C (and 

eventually GPS) would prove to be much better suited for that role. Propagation studies of WWVL were 

conducted to look at the magnitude of the diurnal phase fluctuations at various distances [65], and an 

extensive field strength study was conducted for both stations [51].

 Published research conducted outside of NBS indicates that WWVB was utilized during its early years 

for a variety of scientific applications, including the correlation of seismic events [66, 67], astronomical 

observations; including the measurement of radio emissions from Jupiter [68], studies of underwater sound 

propagation [69], and studies of the attenuation of VLF and LF radio signals as they pass through the 

Earth’s surface [70].

 Within a few years after WWVB went on the air in Fort Collins, two watershed events changed the 

direction of the station’s future, hastening its transition from a combination of radio research facility and 

metrology service, to a full-time metrology service. The first event occurred in October 1965, when after 

some 20 years of being an integral part of NBS, the Central Radio Propagation Laboratory (CRPL) was 

transferred to a new scientific agency called the Environmental Science Services Administration (ESSA).

Within ESSA, the name of CRPL was changed to the Institute for Telecommunication Sciences and 

Aeronomy (ITSA). As a result of the transfer, NBS lost a number of radio engineers and some of its radio 

research facilities to ITSA, which stayed at the same location in Boulder, Colorado. This made NBS less 

likely to engage in radio research and propagation studies and more likely to focus on using its radio 

facilities to support measurement and primary standards work [1]. Of course, WWVB, as well as its sister 

stations WWV, WWVH, and WWVL, were not transferred to ITSA. They stayed with NBS and remained a 

key part of its basic standards work.

 The second event occurred in 1967 when the Time and Frequency division of NBS was formed at the 

Boulder laboratories. It was a logical year to form a new division, because 1967 was when the second was 

internationally agreed upon to be based on an atomic transition (specifically as 9,192,631,770 energy 

transitions of the cesium atom). The redefined second officially began the era of atomic timekeeping. NBS 

had engaged in many different time and frequency activities for decades, including the development of 

atomic clocks as well as the operation of the radio stations, but these activities had previously been spread 

across several groups. Everything was now consolidated into one division [1]. Within the new division, the 

primary role of WWVB, as it remains to this day, was to serve as a time and frequency service – a freely 

available signal source that delivered standard frequency and time signals, referenced to the national 

standard, to the American public. Accuracy, as always, remained important, but reliability became almost 

equally important. During the years that followed, many commercial products, including disciplined 
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

46 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

oscillators and radio controlled clocks, were manufactured to receive WWVB and take advantage of this 

free U. S. government service, as described in the following sections.

14. WWVB Disciplined Oscillators

 Starting in the 1960s, WWVB disciplined oscillator products were available commercially. These 

products consisted of a WWVB receiver and antenna, a phase detector/comparator, and a local quartz 

oscillator. The phase comparator was used to measure the difference between the local oscillator and the 

incoming WWVB signal. A correction was then issued to the local oscillator to keep it phase locked to 

WWVB. Some devices allowed users to connect another oscillator, which could then be calibrated by 

comparing it to the oscillator that was phase locked to WWVB [71]. The uncertainty of a WWVB 

disciplined oscillator was related to the WWVB signal quality, which meant that it was often a function of 

the receiver’s distance from the transmitter. However, a frequency uncertainty of less than 1 × 10−11 could 

often be obtained with one day of averaging in most parts of the United States.

 The manufacturers who once sold WWVB disciplined oscillator products include Fluke, HewlettPackard, Spectracom, Tracor, and True Time/Kinemetrics. Spectracom, located in East Rochester, New 

York, probably sold the most units. The Spectracom 8160 series of products were once commonly found in 

standards and calibration laboratories, with Spectracom receiving a patent for their disciplined oscillator 

system in 1985 [72]. Figure 20 is a photograph of the Spectracom 8164.

Fig. 20. Spectracom 8164 WWVB Disciplined Oscillator (A. Novick, NIST).

 Most WWVB disciplined oscillator products had disappeared from the marketplace by the year 2000, 

replaced by GPS disciplined oscillators, which typically had uncertainties that were one or two orders of 

magnitude smaller than the WWVB products, and that could work reliably anywhere on Earth. The small 

number of WWVB disciplined oscillator products that still remained in operation became obsolete in 

October 2012, when a phase modulated time code was added to the WWVB carrier (Sec. 17).
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

47 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

15. WWVB Power Upgrade

 As noted earlier, WWVB began operations at the Fort Collins site with a radiated output power of 4 kW 

[42]. This was increased to 7 kW shortly after the station went on the air [43]. NBS regularly published 

guides for users of its broadcast services, and the radiated output power was listed as 10 kW in the 1966 

guide [47], increasing to 12 kW by 1967 [73], to 16 kW in 1969 [74], and finally settling at 13 kW in 1972 

[54], where it remained for many years. The 13 kW power level was usually sufficient for high quality 

receivers with antennas mounted outdoors. Even then, however, reception was not always reliable, 

especially in regions such as the northeastern states or southern Florida.

 WWVB continued broadcasting throughout the 1970s, 1980s, and early 1990s with only minor 

modifications made to its format or equipment. The number of users of the signal was relatively small; 

mostly calibration laboratories who operated WWVB disciplined oscillators, such as the devices described 

in Sec. 14. The limitations of the aging transmitting equipment at WWVB became increasingly apparent as 

the years passed. The situation came to a head on February 7, 1994 when a heavy mist froze to the antenna, 

and the antenna tuning system could not compensate, shutting down the WWVB broadcasts for about 30 

hours [75]. After reviewing the available options, it was decided that a redesign of the entire WWVB 

transmitting system was necessary [7].

 During the discussions about redesigning WWVB, the decision was made to make WWVB more 

“relevant” by substantially raising its power level. It was obvious that WWVB could play a larger role in 

the time and frequency community if its signal was easy to receive with low cost equipment. In Europe, 

low cost radio controlled clocks were beginning to appear, designed to synchronize to stations such as MSF 

in the United Kingdom and DCF77 in Germany [46]. These stations were very similar to WWVB, but had 

a much smaller coverage area to service. As a result, European customers were able to purchase radio 

controlled alarm clocks, wall clocks, and wristwatches that worked indoors with small antennas hidden 

inside their case. These clocks had an advantage over satellite controlled clocks, which could not reliably 

work indoors without a view of the sky. Don Sullivan, then the chief of the NIST Time and Frequency 

division, believed that these same products being sold in Europe could be offered in the United States if the 

WWVB signals were made strong enough to blanket the country. His reasoning proved to be correct, as we

shall see in the next section.

 Beginning in October 1994, consultants and engineers from the U.S. Navy’s LF/VLF support group 

were hired by NIST (the agency’s name changed from NBS to NIST in 1988) to evaluate the existing 

WWVB system and to propose changes. Their reports [31, 38] suggested that although the antennas 

themselves were in reasonably good shape, the transmitters and matching equipment should be completely 

redesigned and new or upgraded equipment installed. The project progressed in phases over the next 

several years, resulting in the transfer of modern LF transmitters (AN/FRT-72) and other equipment from 

recently decommissioned Navy facilities to NIST. New station staff members were hired who had previous 

experience with the acquired systems and equipment. Contractors normally employed by the Navy for LF 

work were hired to design a new broadcast control system that fully utilized the assets of the existing 

station [7].

 A formal announcement that the WWVB power was to be increased was made during 1996. The 

transmitters were received and installed that same year. The station modernization took place throughout 

1997, and by December 1997, an interim stage of the upgrade was completed and the radiated output power 

was increased to about 27 kW. By August 5, 1999, the upgrade was complete. The new WWVB 

configuration used two transmitters operating into two antennas that simultaneously broadcast the same

60 kHz signal. The second antenna was the north antenna, which had been essentially unused since WWVL 

had gone off the air in 1972, except for a few instances when it was used as an emergency backup to the 

south antenna [32]. When used individually, the north antenna was found to be about 56 % efficient and the 

south antenna had an efficiency of about 54 %. When the two antennas were combined into one array, the 

efficiency increased to almost 69 %, allowing 50 kW to be radiated with only about 37 kW input to both 

antennas [7]. This represented about four times more power (6 dB) than the pre-upgrade configuration.

 The redesigned station suffered a temporary setback on February 27, 2001, when the uppermost 30 m 

of one of the 122 m high WWVB towers was severely bent due to the failure of an insulator pin (Fig. 21) 

[76]. The failure occurred with Tower 7, one of four towers in the north antenna. The required repairs were 
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

48 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

extensive, and for the next several months the station operated with only the south antenna, although 

increasing the input power to the south antenna allowed the station to radiate about 37 kW. Transmission 

from both antennas resumed on May 14, 2001, and the station returned to normal operation on June 14, 

2001 when the repairs were completed. On September 29, 2003 a less extensive failure again occurred to 

Tower 7, but this time it was still possible to tune the north antenna and keep it operational most of the 

time. Even so, the station operated with only the south antenna for brief periods until August 2004.

Fig. 21. A view from the ground of Tower 7 after the 2001 insulator pin failure.

 The transmission system at WWVB has continuously undergone small improvements in recent years to 

optimize the output power. At this writing (2013) the input to each antenna is about 51 kW. The current 

efficiency of the combined antenna array is estimated at 68.8 %, resulting in an effective radiated output 

power of about 70 kW [77].

16. WWVB Radio Controlled Clocks

 For more than three decades after going on the air in Fort Collins, WWVB had gradually been 

transitioning from being a reference source for frequency to being a reference source for time-of-day. This 

transition was greatly accelerated after the power upgrade was announced in 1996. As noted in Sec. 10, 

WWVB began broadcasting a time code on July 1, 1965. Even so, radio controlled clocks (RCCs) did not 

instantly appear, and the first application of the new time code was to add time markers to strip chart 

recordings, particularly for the timing of seismic events [66].
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

49 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

 A few years after the time code was added, a small number of clocks appeared that could automatically 

decode and display WWVB time. The first commercially available RCC was probably the Develco 3391, 

which was providing accurate time for the electric power industry by 1969 [78]. Some hobbyists began 

building WWVB RCCs in the early 1970s based on a design published in Radio Electronics [79, 80], and a 

few commercial models became available throughout the 1970s and 1980s, built by manufacturers such as 

Spectracom and True Time/Kinemetrics. For the most part, however, these clocks were unknown to the 

general public, and their use was limited to scientific and industrial applications. They usually required an 

outdoor antenna. During the pre-microprocessor days they also required a substantial amount of electronic 

circuitry, which made them expensive to manufacture.

 By the time of the power upgrade announcement in 1996, it was much more feasible for low-cost RCCs 

to be developed. Low cost microprocessor units made it easy to decode the signal under less than optimal 

conditions. The circuits used very little power and could be battery operated, often requiring only a single 

AA cell. Small ferrite bar antennas were available that could be embedded inside the plastic case of a RCC.

As a result, WWVB RCCs began entering homes and offices shortly after the 1996 announcement of the 

station power upgrade, with some models appearing even before the station began broadcasting higher 

power levels.

 The first low-cost WWVB RCC intended for home use was probably manufactured by the German 

company Junghans, which began selling a desktop WWVB clock (Fig. 22) in the United States in 1996.

Earlier versions of this clock were sold in Germany for the reception of DCF77. Semiconductor 

manufacturers such as Telefunken in Germany and Atmel in the United States soon released single-chip 

WWVB receivers. A steady stream of WWVB wall clocks, desk clocks, and wristwatches [81] were 

introduced, and new products continue to be released. WWVB RCCs are now commonly found in U. S. 

department and discount stores, with prices sometimes dropping below $10 USD, making NIST time 

available to nearly all of the U. S. population. Manufacturers and resellers of WWVB RCCs have included 

Acurite, Arcron-Zeit, Casio, Emerson, Howard Miller, Lacrosse Technology, Oregon Scientific, Primex, 

Radio Shack, Sangean, Seiko, Sharp, Sky Scan, Timex, and many others.

Fig. 22. The Junghans MEGA, introduced in the United States around 1996, was probably the first low cost WWVB radio controlled 

clock (A. Novick, NIST).
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

50 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Fig. 23. A Casio “Multi Band 6” wristwatch. Introduced in 2008, these devices can synchronize to LF time signals from China (68.5 

kHz), Germany (77.5 kHz), Japan (40 and 60 kHz), and the United Kingdom (60 kHz), in addition to the 60 kHz signal from WWVB 

(courtesy of Casio).

 The time code format utilized by WWVB is not identical to the time codes of other LF time signal

stations. However, it is similar, as are the transmission frequencies, which all fall in the range from 40 kHz 

to 80 kHz. This has led to “multiband” technology which allows some RCCs to synchronize throughout 

much of the United States, Asia, and Europe. Figure 23 shows a wristwatch that can synchronize to six 

different LF time signal stations, provided that it is within receiving range of the transmitter.

 As expected, the many millions of WWVB RCCs in operation resulted in a large number of technical 

support questions being directed to the Time and Frequency Services group of NIST. To assist both 

manufacturers and consumers of RCC products, NIST published Special Publication 960-14 in 2005 

(revised in 2009) [82]. The guide is believed to have helped RCC manufacturers improve the quality and 

reliability of their products, and to help consumers better understand how the clocks work.

 Consumers commonly ask about the accuracy of WWVB RCCs. Most RCCs synchronize to the 

WWVB time code once every 24 hours and are usually accurate to within ~30 ms at the time of 

synchronization, even if the clock is located at the far reaches of the station’s coverage area. However, in 

between synchronizations, an RCC is no more accurate than their internal quartz oscillator. If the frequency 

of the RCC’s quartz oscillator is accurate to within a few parts per million, ~3 × 10−6 (which is not difficult 

to achieve even with inexpensive quartz crystals), then the accumulated time error between 

synchronizations will not exceed about a quarter of a second. A time error that small often cannot be 

detected by a person viewing an analog or digital clock display. Thus, a WWVB RCC appears to always be 

exactly synchronized to NIST time if it can synchronize once per day [83].

17. Modulation Changes to Improve Radio Controlled Clock Reception

 After the WWVB power upgrade was completed in 1999, RCCs generally worked well in the 48 states 

of the continental U. S., with intermittent reception even reported in Hawaii and Alaska during the 

nighttime hours. However, WWVB reception was often sporadic in the daytime hours and sometimes 

difficult even at night, particularly in the northeastern states and in southern Florida, which were both 

heavily populated areas. This was due to several factors; including the absorption of the sky wave signal by 
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

51 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

the ionosphere during the daytime hours, atmospheric noise from electrical storms and other sources, local 

and RF interference, multipath (ground wave/sky wave cancellation), and even interference from the 

British station MSF, which also transmits at 60 kHz across the Atlantic. This situation was improved 

somewhat by increasing the depth of the carrier amplitude modulation to 17 dB in 2006 [48], but it was 

believed that the only true solution was to build another LF time signal station in the eastern United States 

that operated on a different frequency, which was expected to be 40 kHz.

 NIST investigated several site locations for a new station including Annapolis, Maryland, and 

Greenville, North Carolina, and pursued various funding opportunities. After several years of searching for 

resources, federal funding was appropriated through the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 

(ARRA) for a new station at the Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville, Alabama. Redstone Arsenal is operated by 

the U.S. Army, and includes several research and testing activities from the Department of Defense, NASA 

(Marshall Space Flight Center), and other Federal agencies. Representatives of some activities at Redstone 

expressed concern about potential radio frequency interference from the proposed high power LF station, 

and after extensive discussions it was determined that the new LF station should not be built at Redstone.

By law, the ARRA funds had to be spent within a limited time frame, which did not provide the 

opportunity to make plans for a different location. The ARRA funding was reprogrammed with agreement 

by Congress and the Administration to help fund the construction of a new advanced research and 

measurement laboratory on the NIST Boulder campus [84].

 After the unsuccessful attempt to build a new station, the attention shifted to finding new ways to 

making the existing WWVB signal from Fort Collins easier to receive. It was decided to add a phase 

modulated (PM) time code to the 60 kHz carrier that would not affect the legacy pulse width modulated 

time code. This approach had formerly been implemented in 1988 by the LF time station DCF77 in 

Germany [85]. Clocks designed to receive the PM code would benefit from an increased signal-to-noise 

ratio, making the time code easier to decode, and thus making RCCs more reliable.

 Through its Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program, NIST awarded a grant to 

Xtendwave, a company located in Dallas, Texas, in September 2010. The grant was for the design of time 

code generators and time code receivers for a PM time code that could be reliably received even during 

harsh signal conditions. In cooperation with NIST, Xtendwave designed the PM time code by utilizing a 

modulation scheme called binary phase shift keying (BPSK). This technique differentiates between a 0 and 

a 1 bit by shifting the phase of the 60 kHz carrier [86]. A 0 bit is transmitted when there is no phase shift, 

and a 1 bit is transmitted by inverting the phase of the carrier by 180o. The phase transition between each 

bit and the next one in the 1 bps (bit per second) PM frame occurs 100 ms after the carrier amplitude drop 

that indicates the start of a second.

 The duration of the PM time frame is 60 s. It includes a synchronization word, a time word, and 

daylight saving time (DST) and leap second information. The time word, from which the year (excluding 

century), the date, and the hour and minutes may be extracted, is represented by a 26-bit minute counter 

that represents the number of minutes that have elapsed since this century began at 00:00 Coordinated 

Universal Time on January 1, 2000. The 26-bit time word is converted to a 31-bit Hamming code by the 

addition of five error correcting bits. This allows the time code receiver to correct one error and to detect up 

to two errors in the time word [87].

 The PM time code system was designed to be scalable, and allows for receivers experiencing different 

reception conditions to use the received signal differently. In particular, it allows for the accumulation of 

received energy over multiple one-minute frames, to provide for a corresponding signal gain in the receiver 

(i.e., reception for a whole hour may provide a gain of 60, or 18 dB, with respect to reception for a single 

minute) [86]. This can greatly increase the robustness and reliability of RCCs designed to utilize the PM 

time code, making them, for example, much more likely to be able to synchronize in the daylight hours.

This is expected to lead to WWVB receivers being embedded in many types of products where they are 

currently not found – including industrial control systems, automobiles, kitchen appliances, and sprinkler 

systems. Xtendwave has designed [88, 89] and is manufacturing WWVB receiver integrated circuits, and 

other manufacturers are expected to eventually follow suit.

 The format became permanent on October 29, 2012 after about one year of testing. The tests 

demonstrated that the new PM time code did not affect the many millions of low-cost RCCs already in 

operation that received the legacy time code. However, it did render the old WWVB disciplined oscillator 
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

52 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

products described in Sec. 14 obsolete. As a service to the few remaining users of these products, the PM 

time code was initially omitted from the broadcast twice daily for 30 minutes, beginning at noon and 

midnight Mountain time. This practice was discontinued on March 21, 2013 when the broadcasting of the 

PM time code became continuous.

 At this writing (September 2013) the station is also experimenting with a fast PM time code that, if 

implemented, will allow clocks to synchronize every 10 s, as an alternative to the standard 60 s time code 

frame. The fast time code will not interfere with either the legacy pulse width modulated code or the 

standard PM time code. This will allow “intelligent” RCCs to be designed that select the time code best 

suited for the current receiving conditions.

18. Summary

 The year 2013 marks the 50th anniversary of the NIST radio station WWVB broadcasts from Fort 

Collins, Colorado. As we have seen in this narrative, however, the actual story of WWVB began much 

earlier, when NIST’s predecessor, the National Bureau of Standards, began conducting early radio 

experiments. Throughout its long and colorful history, WWVB has demonstrated an almost uncanny ability 

to evolve and “reinvent” itself, by adapting old technology to meet the needs of new applications. It has 

now fully transitioned from a station whose primary function was to serve as a frequency reference, to one 

that provides daily time-of-day synchronizations for many millions of radio controlled clocks found in

U. S. homes and businesses. One of the most popular and most relevant metrology services provided by 

NIST, WWVB should continue to serve the timekeeping needs of the American public for decades to 

come.

19. References

[1] W. F. Snyder and C. L. Bragaw, Achievement in Radio: Seventy Years of Radio Science, Technology, Standards and 

Measurement at the National Bureau of Standards, Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 555, October 1986, 863 pp.

[2] L. W. Austin, Detector for very small alternating currents and electrical waves, Bull. Bur. Stand. 1 (3), 435-438 (1905). 

http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/bulletin.023

[3] J. E. Brittain, Electrical Engineering Hall of Fame: John H. Dellinger, Proceedings of the IEEE 95 (9), 1884-1887 (2007). 

http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2007.900973

[4] D. B. Sullivan, Time and Frequency Measurement at NIST: The First 100 Years, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International 

Frequency Control Symposium (2001) 4-17. 

[5] J. H. Dellinger, Reducing the Guesswork in Tuning, Radio Broadcast 3, 241-245 (1923).

[6] M. A. Lombardi, The Evolution of Time Measurement, Part 2: Quartz Clocks, IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement 

Magazine 14 (5), 41-48 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MIM.2011.6041381

[7] G. K. Nelson, M. A. Lombardi, and D. T. Okayama, NIST Time and Frequency Radio Stations: WWV, WWVH, and WWVB, 

Nat. Inst. Stand. Technol. Special Publication 250-67, January 2005.

[8] H. J. Walls, Radio Signals of Standard Frequency and Their Utilization, Bureau of Standards Letter Circular 92, April 1923, 5

pp.

[9] H. J. Walls, The Standard-Frequency Set at WWV, QST, 8, 9-12 (1924).

[10] J. H. Dellinger and E. L. Hall, Radio dissemination of the national standard of frequency, Radio Engineering 12, 23-24 (1932).

[11] W. D. George, Production of Accurate One-Second Time Intervals, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand., Research Paper RP1136, 21, 367-

373 (1938).

[12] Technical Radio Broadcast Services, Radio Station WWV, Nat. Bur. Stand. Letter Circular LC875, August 1947, 6 pp.

[13] Standard Frequencies and Time Signals, WWV and WWVH, Nat. Bur. Stand. Letter Circular LC974, January 1950, 2 pp.

[14] G. H. Lester, Experimental Standard-Frequency Transmitting Station, Communications 29, 20-23, 32-33 (1949).

[15] J. M. Shaull, Adjustment of High-Precision Frequency and Time Standards, Proceedings of the IRE 38 (1), 6-15 (1950). 

http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1950.232447

[16] N. Hironaka and C. Trembath, The Use of National Bureau of Standards High Frequency Broadcasts for Time and Frequency 

Calibrations, Nat. Bur. Stand. Tech. Note 668, May 1975, 47 pp.

[17] Y. Beers, WWV Moves to Colorado, QST, 51, Part 1, 11-14 (January 1967), Part 2, 30-36 (February 1967).

[18] E. Passaglia, A Unique Institution: The National Bureau of Standards 1950-1969, U. S. Government Printing Office, 

Washington, DC (1999) p. 375.

[19] J. A. Pierce, The Diurnal Carrier-Phase Variation of a 16-Kilocyle Transatlantic Signal, Proceedings of the IRE 43 (5), 584-588 

(May 1955). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1955.278102
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

53 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

[20] J. A. Pierce, H. T. Mitchell, and L. Essen, World-wide Frequency and Time Comparisons by Means of Radio Transmission, 

Nature 174, 922 (November 13, 1954). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/174922a0

[21] Experimental Standard Frequency Broadcast on 60 Kilocycles, Nat. Bur. Stand. Tech. News Bull. 41 (7), 99-100 (1957).

[22] W. D. George, Low Frequency Standards Transmission, Proceedings of the 11th Annual Frequency Control Symposium (1957) 

574-585. 

[23] J. A. Pierce, Intercontinental Frequency Comparison by Very Low-Frequency Radio Transmission, Proceedings of the IRE 45

(6), 794-803 (1957). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1957.278477

[24] P. Forman, AtomichronTM: The Atomic Clock from Concept to Commercial Product, Proceedings of the IEEE 73, 1181-1204 

(1985). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1985.13266

[25] R. Mockler, R. Beehler, and J. Barnes, An evaluation of a cesium beam frequency standard, National Bureau of Standards 

Report 6075, October 1959.

[26] J. A. Pierce, Recent Long-Distance Frequency Comparisons, IRE Transactions on Instrumentation I-7 (3), 207-210 (1958). 

http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IRE-I.1958.5006790

[27] B. E. Blair and A. H. Morgan, Control of WWV and WWVH Standard Frequency Broadcasts by VLF and LF Signals, Nat. 

Bur. Stand. Radio Sci. J. Res. 69D, 323-336 (July 1965).

[28] A. D. Watt and R. W. Plush, Power Requirements and Choice of an Optimum Frequency for a Worldwide Standard-Frequency 

Broadcasting Station, Nat. Bur. Stand. Radio Sci. J. Res. 63D (1), 35-44 (July-August 1959).

[29] New Standard Frequency Broadcasts, Nat. Bur. Stand. Tech. News Bull. 44 (7), 120-122 (1960).

[30] J. H. Shoaf, Standard Frequency Station WWVL, Nat. Bur. Stand. Report 7221, January 1962.

[31] P. Hansen and D. Gish, WWVB Antenna and Antenna Tuning System Baseline Measurements, Naval Command, Control and 

Ocean Surveillance Center (NCCOSC), San Diego, California, Tech. Rep. 1693, February 1995.

[32] New Facilities Dedicated for WWVB and WWVL, Nat. Bur. Stand. Tech. News Bull. 47 (10), 178-180 (1963).

[33] Work About to Start on Masts for Bureau’s Radio Station, Fort Collins Coloradoan newspaper article, July 12, 1962.

[34] W. W. Brown, A.D. Watt, A.H. Morgan, and V. Lecinski, Summary Report: Standard VLF Broadcast Station, Summary Report 

SM-1014, Nat. Bur. Stand. Project 84123, July 1959.

[35] N. Lindenblad and W. W. Brown, Main Considerations in Antenna Design, Proc. Inst. of Radio Engineers 14 (3), 291-323 

(1926).

[36] P. Hansen and D. Rodriguez, High Power VLF/LF Transmitting Antennas – Wheeler’s Circuit Approximations Applied to 

Power Limitations, Proc. of IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Symposium (2012) 1-2.

[37] P. Hansen, VLF Cutler Hollow Core Cable Repair/Replacement, Naval Command, Control and Ocean Surveillance Center 

(NCCOSC), San Diego, California, Tech. Rep. 1681, September 1994.

[38] P. Hansen and D. Gish, WWVB Baseline Measurements: Summary, Findings and Recommendations, Naval Command, 

Control and Ocean Surveillance Center (NCCOSC), San Diego, California, Tech. Rep. 1692, February 1995.

[39] J. M. Richardson, Establishment of New Facilities for WWVL and WWVB, Nat. Bur. Stand. Radio Sci. J. Res. 68D (1), 135

(January 1964). http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.068D.026

[40] Frequency and Time Transmission: New LF and VLF antennas and transmitters under construction, Nat. Bur. Stand. Tech. 

News Bull. 46 (12), 185-186 (1962).

[41] National Bureau’s Radio Goes on Air, Fort Collins Coloradoan newspaper article, July 5, 1963.

[42] D. H. Andrews, LF-VLF Frequency and Time Services of the National Bureau of Standards, IEEE Trans. on Instrumentation 

and Measurement IM-14 (4), 233-237 (1965).

[43] NBS, Standard Frequency and Time Services of the National Bureau of Standards: Provided by Radio Stations WWV, WWVH, 

WWVB, & WWVL, Nat. Bur. Stand. Miscellaneous Publication 236, January 1965 edition.

[44] NBS, WWVB adds time code to broadcasts, Nat. Bur. Stand. Tech. News Bull. 50 (1), 15-16 (1966).

[45] Experimental timing code added to WWV broadcasts, Nat. Bur. Stand. Tech. News Bull. 44 (7), 114-115 (1960).

[46] A. Bauch, P. Hetzel, and D. Piester, Time and Frequency Dissemination with DCF77: From 1959 to 2009 and beyond, PTBMitteilungen 119 (3), 3-26 (2009).

[47] NBS, NBS Standard Frequency and Time Services: Radio Stations WWV WWVH WWVB WWVL, Nat. Bur. Stand. 

Miscellaneous Publication 236, 1966 edition.

[48] J. P. Lowe and K. C. Allen, Increasing the Modulation Depth of the WWVB Time Code to Improve the Performance of Radio 

Controlled Clocks, Proceedings of the IEEE Frequency Control Symposium (2006) 615-621. 

[49] M. A. Lombardi, NIST Time and Frequency Services, Nat. Inst. Stand. Technol. Special Publication 432, January 2002.

[50] D. H. Andrews, C. Chaslain, and J. DePrins, Reception of Low Frequency Time Signals, Frequency 6 (9), 13-21 (September 

1968).

[51] J. B. Milton, WWVB/WWVL Field Studies, Nat. Bur. Stand. Report 9725, March 1969.

[52] J. L. Jespersen, G. Kamas, L. E. Gatterer, and P. F. MacDoran, Satellite VHF Transponder Time Synchronization, Proc. IEEE 

56, 1202-1206 (1968). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1968.6517

[53] NBS, WWVL Changes Broadcast Format, Nat. Bur. Stand. Tech. News Bull. 53 (12), 284 (1969).

[54] P. P. Viezbicke, NBS Frequency and Time Broadcast Services: Radio Stations WWV, WWVH, WWVB, and WWVL, Nat. 

Bur. Stand. Special Publication 236, March 1972.

[55] C. H. Looney, A Very Low Frequency (VLF) Synchronizing System, Proceedings of the IRE 49 (2), 458-452 (1961). 

http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1961.287805

[56] R. L. Fey, J. B. Milton, and A. H. Morgan, Remote Phase Control of Radio Station WWVL, Nature 193, 1063-1064 (March 

1962). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/1931063c0

[57] J. B. Milton, Standard Time and Frequency: Its Generation, Control, and Dissemination by the National Bureau of Standards 

Time and Frequency Division, Nat. Bur. Stand. Technical Note 379-1, June 1972.
Volume 119 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

54 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.004

[58] J. Tolman, V. Ptacek, A. Soucek, and R. Stecher, Microsecond Clock Comparison by Means of TV Synchronizing Pulses, IEEE 

Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement IM-16 (3), 247-254 (September 1967). 

http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIM.1967.4313630

[59] NBS, Commercial Television Aids NBS Standard Broadcasts, Nat. Bur. Stand. Tech. News Bull. 53 (5), 111 (1969).

[60] Commercial TV Carrier Waves Used to Keep NBS’ Clocks Synchronized, Boulder Daily Camera newspaper article, February 

10, 1969.

[61] D. W. Allan and M. A. Weiss, Accurate Time and Frequency Transfer During Common-View of a GPS Satellite, Proceedings 

of the 1980 Frequency Control Symposium (1980) 334-346.

[62] D. D. Davis, M. A. Weiss, A. J. Clements, and D. W. Allan, Construction and Performance Characteristics of a Prototype 

NBS/GPS Receiver, Proceedings of the 1981 Frequency Control Symposium (1981) 546-552.

[63] J. Levine, Realizing UTC(NIST) at a remote location, Metrologia 45, S23-S33 (December 2008). 

http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/45/6/S04

[64] B. E. Blair, E. L. Crow, and A. H. Morgan, Five Years of VLF Worldwide Comparison of Atomic Frequency Standards, Radio 

Science 2 (6), 627-636 (June 1967).

[65] J. L. Jespersen, G. Kamas, and A. H. Morgan, VLF Propagation over Distances Between 200 and 1500 km, MF, LF, and VLF 

Radio Propagation Conference Publication Number 36 (November 1967) 74-80.

[66] A. Ryall, J. D. VanWormer, and A. E. Jones, Triggering of Microearthquakes by Earth Tides, and other Features of the 

Truckee, California, Earthquake Sequence of September, 1966, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 58 (1), 215-

248 (February 1968).

[67] J. P. Eaton, M. E. O’Neill, and J. N. Murdock, Aftershocks of the 1966 Parkfield-Cholame, California, Earthquake: A Detailed 

Study, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 60 (4), 1151-1197 (August 1970).

[68] J. J. Riihimaa, Modulation Lanes in the Dynamic Spectra of Jovian L Bursts, Astronomy and Astrophysics 4, 180-188 (1970).

[69] J. C. Steinberg and T. G. Birdsall, Underwater Sound Propagation in the Straits of Florida, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 39 (2), 301-315 

(1966). http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1909891

[70] E. Bramel, R. Barkhaus, and H. R. Smith, Measured Earth Attenuation for LF-VLF Far Field Signals at One Site, IEEE 

Transactions on Communications 23 (11), 1373-1374 (November 1975).

[71] T. Osterdock, Timekeeping and Frequency Calibration, Hewlett Packard Application Note 52-2, November 1975.

[72] R. E. Hesselberth, T. P. Danaher, and J. E. Sandahl, Disciplined Oscillator System with Frequency Control and Accumulated 

Time Control, United States Patent 4,525,685, filed May 31, 1983, granted June 25, 1985.

[73] NBS, NBS Standard Frequency and Time Services: Radio Stations WWV WWVH WWVB WWVL, Nat. Bur. Stand. 

Miscellaneous Publication 236, 1967 edition.

[74] NBS, NBS Frequency and Time Broadcast Services: Radio Stations WWV WWVH WWVB WWVL, Nat. Bur. Stand. Special 

Publication 236, 1969 edition.

[75] M. Deutch, D. W. Hanson, G. Nelson, C. Snider, D. Sutton, W. Yates, P. M. Hansen, and B. Hopkins, WWVB Improvements: 

New Power From An Old Timer, Proceedings of the Precise Time and Time Interval Meeting (December 1999) 523-535.

[76] J. D. McColskey, C. N. McCowan, and R. L. Santoyo, Failure Analysis of the WWVB Tower, Nat. Inst. Stand. Technol. 

Interagency/Internal Report 6619, August 2002.

[77] P. Hansen and D. Gish, WWVB Post Repair: Antenna Performance Measurement, SPAWAR Systems Center (SSC), San 

Diego, California, Tech. Note 1834, December 2003.

[78] B. J. Laveau, A new time standard, Leeds & Northrop Technical Journal, issue 7, 12-17 (Fall 1969).

[79] D. Lancaster, Experiment with WWVB, Radio Electronics 44 (8), 48-51 (August 1973).

[80] D. Lancaster, Build WWVB Receiver: Part II – Final Details, Radio Electronics 44 (9), 98 (September 1973).

[81] M. A. Lombardi, Radio Controlled Wristwatches, The Horological Journal 148 (5), 187-190 (May 2006).

[82] M. A. Lombardi, A. N. Novick, J. P. Lowe, M. J. Deutch, G. K. Nelson, D. D. Sutton, W. C. Yates, and D. W. Hanson, WWVB 

Radio Controlled Clocks: Recommended Practices for Manufacturers and Consumers (2009 edition), Nat. Inst. Stand. Technol. 

Special Publication 960-14, September 2009 (revision of January 2005 edition).

[83] M. A. Lombardi, How accurate is a radio controlled clock?, The Horological Journal 152 (3), 108-111 (March 2010).

[84] J. Lowe, We Help Move Time Through the Air, Radio World 35 (8), 69-70 (March 23, 2011).

[85] P. Hetzel, Time dissemination via the LF transmitter DCF77 using a pseudo-random phase-shift keying of the carrier,

Proceedings of the 2nd European Frequency and Time Forum (March 1988) 351-364.

[86] J. Lowe, M. Deutch, G. Nelson, D. Sutton, W. Yates, P. Hansen, O. Eliezer, T. Jung, S. Morrison, Y. Liang, D. Rajan, 

S. Balasubramanian, A. Ramasami, and W. Khalil, New Improved System for WWVB Broadcast, Proceedings of the Precise 

Time and Time Interval Meeting (November 2011) 163-184.

[87] J. Lowe, Enhanced WWVB Broadcast Format, 13 p., September 2012 (available at http://tf.nist.gov/general/pdf/2651.pdf).

[88] O. E. Eliezer, Radio controlled clock receiver for receiving phase modulation over a pulse width modulated/amplitude 

modulated signal, United States Patent WO2013074519 A1, filed November 13, 2012, granted May 23, 2013. 

[89] O. E. Eliezer, Timing and Time Information Extraction in a Radio Controlled Clock Receiver, United States Patent US 

2013/0121399 A1, filed October 29, 2012, granted May 16, 2013.

About the authors: Michael Lombardi and Glenn Nelson are staff members in the Time and Frequency 

Services group of NIST. Michael Lombardi manages the group’s remote calibration services from Boulder, 

Colorado. Glenn Nelson is an electronics technician at radio station WWVB/WWV in Fort Collins, 

Colorado. The National Institute of Standards and Technology is an agency of the U.S. Department of 

Commerce.