alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

# **SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

# **I, JonathanC. Coon, certify that:**

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of 1-800 CONTACTS, INC.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)              All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Dated: August 12, 2003 |   | /s/ Jonathan C. Coon                  |   |
|------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO********SECTION302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

# **I, Brian W. Bethers, certify that:**

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of 1-800 CONTACTS, INC.;

2.               Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)              Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)              Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a)              All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and reportfinancial information; and

b)             Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Dated:  November 12, 2004 |   | /s/ Brian W. Bethers                   |   |   |
|---------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                      |   | President and Chief  Financial Officer |   |

 

 

 

----
December 6, 2006 

TO SIX MEMBERS OF TGDC: The very recent reversal by TGDC of the NIST 

recommendations regarding security of e voting is an abomination of common sense and logic. 

The TGDC recommendation is a threat to our Democracy. Paper-less voting is so ridiculous it's 

difficult to find non-profane language against you sick six idiots that recommended the e voting 

junk be left as is. I would hope that the EAC ignores your recommendations and that your 

committee is disbanded by the new Congress in January. NIST can understand this technology 

far better than you six nay-sayers who voted against the original NIST recommendation. NIST 

and it's predecessor,THE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS, has been providing a 

magnificent service to our Nation since the beginning of the last Century. Please get out of their 

way. 

WITH SINCERITY AND A GREAT DEAL OF ANGER! 

ROBERT R BROWNLEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Jennie Christensen

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−05051

Honorable Mary M. Rowland

Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, September 13, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Pursuant to the

stipulation of dismissal, this case is dismissed with prejudice. The parties shall bear fees

and costs as set forth in the Settlement Agreement, dated this August 20th 2021. Any

pending motions or schedules in this case are stricken as moot. Civil case terminated.

Mailed notice. (dm, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-05051 Document #: 58 Filed: 09/13/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:531
**EXHIBIT 12.7**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002**

 

I, Andrew Sukawaty, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 20-F of Inmarsat Ventures Limited (the “Company”); 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.    The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: 

 

(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

 

(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.    The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)    All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)    Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
EX-10.40



 





Exhibit 10.40




PHH CORPORATION

RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT

AWARD NOTICE




Accelerated Vesting Schedule Modification



On June 28, 2005, PHH Corporation (the “Company”) awarded you Restricted Stock Units. A portion of
those Restricted Stock Units would be subject to accelerated vesting on June 28, 2006, if the
Company achieves certain targets for net income growth and return on equity for fiscal year 2005.
However, due to the changes in the Company’s business during fiscal year 2005, the Compensation
Committee has modified the accelerated vesting targets for 2005 as set forth below. This document
constitutes part of and is subject to the terms and provisions of the Award Notice, the PHH
Corporation Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (the “Agreement”), and the PHH Corporation 2005
Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The terms used but not defined in this modification shall have
the meanings set forth in the Award Notice, the Agreement, or the Plan.




	 	 	 
	Grantee:

	 	[Name]
	 

	 	[Address]
	 
	 	 
	Participant #:

	 	[Social Security Number]
	 
	 	 
	Grant Date:

	 	June 28, 2005
	 
	 	 
	Number of Restricted

Stock Units:

	 	[                    ]
	 
	 	 
	Performance Goals for Accelerated Vesting:

	 
	 	 
	Modified Vesting Schedule:

	 	Accelerated Vesting Date: June 28, 2006

25% of the Restricted Stock Units shall become vested
on June 28, 2006, if the Company achieves 100% of its
target (Pre-Tax Income After Minority Interest,
excluding spin-off related expenses, equal to
[***]) for the 2005 fiscal year.





All of the terms and conditions of the Restricted Stock Unit Award Notice except those modified
above, remain in full force and effect.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	PHH CORPORATION	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Name:	 	 
	 	 	Title:	 	 
	 	 	Date: November              , 2005	 	 





RETAIN THIS MODIFICATION, YOUR NOTIFICATION AND YOUR AWARD AGREEMENT WITH YOUR IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS AS A RECORD OF THIS AWARD.






 




	[***] INDICATES MATERIAL THAT HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FOR WHICH CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN
REQUESTED. ALL SUCH OMITTED MATERIAL HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
PURSUANT TO RULE 24b-2 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED.
SUBROUTINE EXPPDF(X,PDF)
C
C     PURPOSE--THIS SUBROUTINE COMPUTES THE PROBABILITY DENSITY
C              FUNCTION VALUE FOR THE EXPONENTIAL DISTRIBUTION
C              WITH MEAN = 1 AND STANDARD DEVIATION = 1.
C              THIS DISTRIBUTION IS DEFINED FOR ALL NON-NEGATIVE X,
C              AND HAS THE PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION
C              F(X) = EXP(-X).
C     INPUT  ARGUMENTS--X      = THE SINGLE PRECISION VALUE AT
C                                WHICH THE PROBABILITY DENSITY
C                                FUNCTION IS TO BE EVALUATED.
C     OUTPUT ARGUMENTS--PDF    = THE SINGLE PRECISION PROBABILITY
C                                DENSITY FUNCTION VALUE.
C     OUTPUT--THE SINGLE PRECISION PROBABILITY DENSITY
C             FUNCTION VALUE PDF.
C     PRINTING--NONE UNLESS AN INPUT ARGUMENT ERROR CONDITION EXISTS. 
C     RESTRICTIONS--X SHOULD BE NON-NEGATIVE.
C     OTHER DATAPAC   SUBROUTINES NEEDED--NONE.
C     FORTRAN LIBRARY SUBROUTINES NEEDED--EXP.
C     MODE OF INTERNAL OPERATIONS--SINGLE PRECISION.
C     LANGUAGE--ANSI FORTRAN. 
C     REFERENCES--JOHNSON AND KOTZ, CONTINUOUS UNIVARIATE
C                 DISTRIBUTIONS--1, 1970, PAGES 207-232.
C     WRITTEN BY--JAMES J. FILLIBEN
C                 STATISTICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY (205.03)
C                 NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS
C                 WASHINGTON, D. C. 20234
C                 PHONE:  301-921-2315
C     ORIGINAL VERSION--JUNE      1972. 
C     UPDATED         --SEPTEMBER 1975. 
C     UPDATED         --NOVEMBER  1975. 
C
C---------------------------------------------------------------------
C
      IPR=6
C
C     CHECK THE INPUT ARGUMENTS FOR ERRORS
C
      IF(X.LT.0.0)GOTO50
      GOTO90
   50 WRITE(IPR,4)
      WRITE(IPR,46)X
      PDF=0.0
      RETURN
   90 CONTINUE
    4 FORMAT(1H , 96H***** NON-FATAL DIAGNOSTIC--THE FIRST  INPUT ARGUME
     1NT TO THE EXPPDF SUBROUTINE IS NEGATIVE *****)
   46 FORMAT(1H , 35H***** THE VALUE OF THE ARGUMENT IS ,E15.8,6H *****)
C
C-----START POINT-----------------------------------------------------
C
      PDF=EXP(-X)
C
      RETURN
      END
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4012 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 305
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4012

                          [Report No. 108-527]

    To amend the District of Columbia College Access Act of 1999 to 
  permanently authorize the public school and private school tuition 
             assistance programs established under the Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 23, 2004

 Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia (for himself and Ms. Norton) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government 
                                 Reform

                              June 8, 2004

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the District of Columbia College Access Act of 1999 to 
  permanently authorize the public school and private school tuition 
             assistance programs established under the Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT AUTHORIZATION OF TUITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS.

    (a) Public School Program.--Section 3(i) of the District of 
Columbia College Access Act of 1999 (sec. 38--2702(i), D.C. Official 
Code) is amended by striking ``each of the five succeeding fiscal 
years'' and inserting ``each succeeding fiscal year''.
    (b) Private School Program.--Section 5(f) of such Act (sec. 38--
2704(f), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking ``each of the five 
succeeding fiscal years'' and inserting ``each succeeding fiscal 
year''.

                                                 Union Calendar No. 305

108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4012

                          [Report No. 108-527]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

    To amend the District of Columbia College Access Act of 1999 to 
  permanently authorize the public school and private school tuition 
             assistance programs established under the Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 8, 2004

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 44665

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

KALLEN J. HAZEL,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2017 Unpublished Opinion No. 527

Filed: July 27, 2017

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Deborah A. Bail, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of five years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of one year, for felony escape, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth Ann Allred, 

Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM 

Kallen J. Hazel pled guilty to felony escape. Idaho Code § 18-2505. The district court 

sentenced Hazel to a unified term of five years with one year determinate. Hazel appeals 

asserting that the district court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 
2

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Hazel’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cummings

FILED 7/24/2020

THOMAS G. BRUTON CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

CC

20 CR 412
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3979

To exempt the natural aging process in the determination of the production 

period for distilled spirits under section 263A of the Internal Revenue 

Code of 1986. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2004

Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To exempt the natural aging process in the determination 

of the production period for distilled spirits under section 

263A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF NATURAL AGING PROCESS IN 

4 DETERMINATION OF PRODUCTION PERIOD 

5 FOR DISTILLED SPIRITS UNDER SECTION 

6 263A. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 263A(f) of the Internal 

8 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to general exceptions) is 
2

•HR 3979 IH 

1 amended by adding at the end the following new para2 graph: 

3 ‘‘(5) EXEMPTION OF NATURAL AGING PROCESS

4 IN DETERMINATION OF PRODUCTION PERIOD FOR

5 DISTILLED SPIRITS.—For purposes of this sub6 section, the production period for distilled spirits 

7 shall be determined without regard to any period al8 located to the natural aging process.’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 this section shall apply to production periods beginning 

11 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ