alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 221 (Monday, November 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 68437]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27097]



[[Page 68437]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER15-359-000]


Samchully Power & Utilities 1 LLC; Supplemental Notice That 
Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 
204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Samchully Power & Utilities 1 LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is November 28, 2014.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive 
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). 
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d1979483929ebfbdb8bfb482a4a1a1bea3a591b7b4a3b2ffb6bea7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dd9b988f9e92b3b1b4b3b88ea8adadb2afa99dbbb8afbef3bab2ab">[email protected]</span></a>. or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: November 7, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-27097 Filed 11-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Research Track Definitions 

Interconnection, Backhaul, and Vehicles: This area of research focuses on the 

transportation, coordination, and interconnection between each deployable network on 

scene. It seeks to address the following: 

● How can these networks be integrated into various platforms to simplify delivery of 

network services 

● How can interconnection between networks and backhaul to other networks be 

optimized using a mesh networking or other topology 

● How can multiple independent networks cooperate with each other to provide the 

best coverage, connection, and service (interference mitigation, dynamic coverage, 

etc.) 

● How can these networks move with the incident 

Resilient Systems: This track will focus the networking protocols and techniques used to 

move data on the HMDN. 

Primarily, the focus is on mission-critical data replication, synchronization, and how to build 

resilience into deployable networks so there is no single point of failure. Inter-network mesh 

connections and topology may be an emphasis so that deployable systems are ad-hoc, 

reliable, self-forming, and self-healing. 

Technologies within this track should support decentralized (“edge”) networking so that 

network subscribers can maximize mobility within different environments. 

Security: This research track focuses on how technologies can dynamically authenticate 

users on deployable networks in a secure and reliable way. Deployable systems will need to 

ensure that authentication is not compromised in instances when there a centralized 

authentication service is not available. 

In addition, this track will focus on how to enable controlled access to data and promote 

secure information sharing at handoffs between deployed networks. 

LTE Platforms: This area of research focuses on the radio access network (RAN) and 

evolved packet core (EPC) portions of the LTE network. The focus is researching how LTE 

systems can share information with other LTE systems so that ad-hoc roaming agreements 

can be established to provide full mobility across a dynamic network. It also focuses on the 

following: 

● Maintaining interoperability among planned and unplanned systems 

● Dynamic interference mitigation and automated power control 

● Leveraging or sharing core resources 

● LTE in the unlicensed bands to augment the public safety band 

Applications: The applications track will focus on end-user experience in Highly Mobile 

Deployed Networks. By addressing the applications utilized within a deployed network, the 

group will explore WHAT information is important to a first responder, and HOW that 

information can be made consistently available in critical conditions. This can include: 

● Identifying potential application requirements for users of a deployed network 

● Determining how application data should be handled 

● Determining the key performance indicators
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE

JAVIER RIVERA FRANCO, 

Relator.

§

§

§

§

No. 08-24-00127-CR

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus against the 

Honorable Lela Mays of the 283rd District Court of Dallas County, Texas and concludes that 

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. We therefore 

dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction, in accordance with the opinion 

of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 20TH DAY OF MAY 2024.

JEFF ALLEY, Chief Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
EXHIBIT 10.6


 


SECOND AMENDMENT TO
THE RESEARCH FUNDING AGREEMENT


 


This Second Amendment to the Research Funding
Agreement is dated as of February 29, 2004. 
On or about March 1, 2001, Dr. Stanislaw R. Burzynski and the Burzynski
Research Institute, Inc. (BRI) entered into a First Amendment to the Research
Funding Agreement, under which funding agreement, inter alia, Dr. Burzynski
agreed to fund the research undertaken by BRI.


 


The parties now wish to and hereby agree to
extend the Research Funding Agreement by entering into this Second Amendment to
the Research Funding Agreement.


 


The Research Funding Agreement shall be
continued for an additional one-year term from the date of this Second
Amendment.


 


In addition, the Research Funding Agreement
shall be automatically renewed for two successive one-year terms, unless one
party provides written notice of its intent not to renew, within thirty (30)
days of the expiration of such term.


 


All other provisions of the Research Funding
Agreement, and where applicable, the First Amendment to the Research Funding
Agreement, shall remain in force.


 


	
   

  	
  /s/ Stanislaw R.
  Burzynski

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Dr. Stanislaw R. Burzynski

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  BURZYNSKI
  RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Stanislaw R.
  Burzynski

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Dr. Stanislaw R.
  Burzynski, President
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 359

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Secretary

of Health and Human Services should carry out a national public awareness campaign to educate American men and women with respect to

colorectal cancer.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 11, 1998

Ms. SLAUGHTER (for herself, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. CARDIN, Mr.

HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. SISISKY, Mr. BERRY, Mrs. CLAYTON, Mr.

FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. FILNER, Mr. FROST, Mr. HILLIARD, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mrs. MALONEY of New York, Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD,

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr. SANDLIN, Mr. SCHUMER, and

Mr. SERRANO) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Commerce

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

the Secretary of Health and Human Services should

carry out a national public awareness campaign to educate American men and women with respect to colorectal

cancer.

Whereas, in 1998, an estimated 131,600 Americans will be

diagnosed with colorectal cancer;

Whereas about 56,500 individuals will die of the disease,

making it the number three cancer killer of men and

women in the United States;
2

•HRES 359 IH

Whereas colorectal cancer strikes men and women in equal

numbers, despite public perceptions that it is a man’s

disease;

Whereas colorectal cancer strikes more frequently among certain minority populations, and these groups have lower

survival rates;

Whereas average survival rates for colorectal cancer are over

90 percent if the cancer is detected at an early, localized

stage;

Whereas the recent discovery of a familial colorectal cancer

gene gives new options to individuals for assessing their

risk and taking advantage of preventive measures;

Whereas most colorectal cancer develops from benign polyps

and develops slowly over many years, providing a window

of opportunity for detection and treatment;

Whereas current screening methods can detect precancerous

polyps and actually prevent the onset of cancer;

Whereas the Congress recently enacted historic health care

reforms which, for the first time, authorized coverage for

preventive colorectal cancer screening procedures for

Medicare beneficiaries; and

Whereas current colorectal cancer screening rates are very

low, with fewer than 20 percent of at-risk Americans taking advantage of regular screening: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) strongly urges the Secretary of Health and

3 Human Services to establish a national public

4 awareness campaign to educate American men and

5 women about their risk for colorectal cancer, preven-
3

•HRES 359 IH

1 tive screening options, and the importance of early

2 detection for this disease; and

3 (2) encourages the Secretary to work closely

4 with groups that have expertise in various aspects of

5 colorectal cancer in designing and carrying out this

6 campaign.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 410 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 29, 1998.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 3546) to provide for a national dialogue on Social Security and to 
establish the Bipartisan Panel to Design Long-Range Social Security Reform. The 
bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The amendment recommended by the 
Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill, modified by the amendments 
printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, 
shall be considered as adopted. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment thereto to final 
passage without intervening motion except: (1) three hours of debate on the 
bill, as amended, which shall be equally divided and controlled by the chairman 
and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; (2) a further 
amendment printed in the Congressional Record pursuant to clause 6 of rule 
XXIII, if offered by Representative Rangel of New York or his designee, which 
shall be considered as read and shall be separately debatable for one hour 
equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one 
motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15


August 10, 2001

Koger Equity, Inc.
8880 Freedom Crossing Trail
Jacksonville, Florida 32256

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Koger Equity, Inc. and subsidiaries for the periods ended June
30, 2001 and 2000, as indicated in our report dated July 27, 2001; because we
did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on such financial information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-55179 of Koger
Equity, Inc. on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-54617 of Koger Equity,
Inc. on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-20975 of Koger Equity, Inc. on
Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-23429 of Koger Equity, Inc. on Form
S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-37919 of Koger Equity, Inc. on Form S-3,
Registration Statement No. 333-33388 of Koger Equity, Inc. on Form S-8 and
Registration Statement No. 333-38712 of Koger Equity, Inc. on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statements prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
West Palm Beach, Florida
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 202A17

Filed 17 August 2018

MARJORIE C. LOCKLEAR 

v.

MATTHEW S. CUMMINGS, M.D., SOUTHEASTERN REGIONAL MEDICAL 

CENTER, DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, and DUKE UNIVERSITY 

AFFILIATED PHYSICIANS, INC.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of 

the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 801 S.E.2d 346 (2017), reversing an order 

entered on 2 February 2016 and affirming an order entered on 4 February 2016, both 

by Judge James Gregory Bell in Superior Court, Robeson County. Heard in the 

Supreme Court on 14 March 2018.

Law Offices of Walter L. Hart, IV, by Walter L. Hart, IV; and Fulmer Law Firm, 

L.L.C., by H. Asby Fulmer, III, pro hac vice, for plaintiff-appellee.

Cranfill Sumner & Hartzog LLP, by Katherine Hilkey-Boyatt, David D. Ward, 

and Matthew R. Gambale, for defendant-appellants Matthew S. Cummings, 

M.D., Duke University Health System, and Duke University Affiliated 

Physicians, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the Court based upon a dissent at the Court of Appeals. 

Locklear v. Cummings, ___ N.C. App. ___, 801 S.E.2d 346 (2017). The dissent

concluded that plaintiff pled “a claim of medical malpractice by a healthcare provider 

in her complaint, not a claim of ordinary negligence as asserted by the majority.” Id.
LOCKLEAR V. CUMMINGS 

Opinion of the Court

-2-

at ___, 801 S.E.2d at 352 (Berger, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). We 

agree that the majority at the Court of Appeals erred when it converted plaintiff’s

claim of medical malpractice into a claim of ordinary negligence. See Viar v. N.C.

Dep’t of Transp., 359 N.C. 400, 402, 610 S.E.2d 360, 361 (2005) (per curiam) (“It is 

not the role of the appellate courts . . . to create an appeal for an appellant.”). We 

therefore reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals on that ground and remand this 

case to that court to address whether the trial court erred in dismissing plaintiff’s 

complaint. See Vaughan v. Mashburn, ___ N.C. ___, ___, ___ S.E.2d ___, ___ (Aug. 17, 

2018) (42PA17) (concluding “that a plaintiff in a medical malpractice action may file 

an amended complaint under Rule 15(a)” by leave of court “to cure a defect in a Rule 

9(j) certification when the expert review and certification occurred before the filing of 

the original complaint”); Thigpen v. Ngo, 355 N.C. 198, 204, 558 S.E.2d 162, 166 

(2002) (“[P]ermitting amendment of a complaint to add the expert certification where 

the expert review occurred after the suit was filed would conflict directly with the 

clear intent of the legislature.”). 

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AT OCTOBER 1, 2000 AND CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 1, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                         339,754
<SECURITIES>                                    25,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  296,499
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,620
<INVENTORY>                                    256,769
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               952,740
<PP&E>                                         318,003
<DEPRECIATION>                                 124,430
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,279,046
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          215,454
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,949
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,046,961
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,279,046
<SALES>                                      1,070,135
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,070,135
<CGS>                                          591,867
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  909,590
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (18,650)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                179,195
<INCOME-TAX>                                    51,967
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            127,228
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   127,228
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .64


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04699

Honorable John Z. Lee

TikTok Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, September 11, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Defendants' response to

Plaintiff M.G.'s motion for temporary restraining order [62] is stricken as moot. By order

dated 9/11/20, the Court struck Plaintiff M.G.'s motion for temporary restraining order for

failure to comply with Case Management Order No. 1. See M.G. v. TikTok Inc. et al., No.

20C5305, ECF No. 8. Mailed notice(ca, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 63 Filed: 09/11/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1560
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Melvin L. Adams, President and Chief Executive Officer of Airxcel, Inc.,
certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Airxcel, Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
      prepared;

b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of
      the Evaluation Date;

5.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a)    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)      any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
        employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
        controls; and

6.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: 8-12-04

By: /s/ Melvin L. Adams
    -----------------------------------
Melvin L. Adams
President and Chief Executive Officer