alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel are you 

a Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this &ourt an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this &ourt’s

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 8.6.&§1746, this

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

In Re: TikTok, Inc., Consumer

Privacy Litigation

20-cv-04699

Morgan Kukovec

Elizabeth Chavez

Foote, Mielke, Chavez & O'Neil, LLC

10 West State Street, Suite 200

Geneva, IL 60134

6323726 630-232-7450

ecc@fmcolaw.com

09/11/2020

✔

✔

✔

✔

Elizabeth C. Chavez

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 67 Filed: 09/11/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1565
Exhibit 99.1

Annual Statement of
ComplianceProtective Life Secured Trust 2004-29 (the "Trust")

I, Millie
Cicero, a duly elected and acting officer of The Bank of New York ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby certify on
behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that:

1.     I
have reviewed and examined the performance by the Indenture Trustee of the
collection and distribution of trust money pursuant to
Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the Indenture
pursuant to which the Trust's notes (the "Notes") were issued during the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2004 (the "Relevant
Year"); and

2.     Based
upon my review and examination described in 1 above, and except as provided in the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated March 30, 2005, prepared by the Trust's
independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with Section 10 of the Expense and Indemnity
Agreement, to the best of my knowledge, the collection of payments on the funding agreements and distribution of payments to noteholders
pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the
Indenture was performed in a satisfactory manner in all material respects
throughout the Relevant Year.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK, as Indenture Trustee

|By: |  | /s/MILLIE CICERO
      Name:  Millie
      CiceroTitle:    Assistant Treasurer |  |  |  | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | 

Date:  March 30, 2005
Exhibit 24.1

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS,that each person whose name appears below constitutes and appoints Brian S.
Moore and Fred L. Hite and each of them, his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for and in his or her
name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 29, 2007, of Symmetry Medical Inc. and any or all
amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of
them, or their or his substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

This
power of attorney has been signed as of the 24th day of March, 2008, by the following persons:

|/s/FRANCIS T. NUSSPICKELFrancis T. Nusspickel, Director |  | /s/FRANK TURNERFrank Turner, Director    
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|/s/STEPHEN B. ORESMANStephen B. Oresman, Director       |  | /s/JAMES S. BURNSJames S. Burns, Director
|/s/CRAIG B. REYNOLDSCraig B. Reynolds, Director         |  | /s/JOHN S. KRELLEJohn S. Krelle, Director

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 4.44

TERMINATION NOTICE TO LEASING AGREEMENT

Ms Chan Chi Shan

4A Blue Pool Road,

Happy Valley,

Hong Kong

June 19, 2007

Dear Ms Chan,

Pursuant to the Shanghai House Lease
Contract (the Agreement), between you and eLongNet Information Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. or eLong entered as of June 20, 2006, eLong notifies you as follows:

eLong hereby provides more than 15 days advance notice of termination of the Agreement, pursuant to Article IX. 9-1. (VI) of the Agreement. The Agreement
will be terminated effective as of July 12, 2007.

Sincerely,

By:



|                                                                  |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ eLongNet Information Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd           
|Company Name: eLongNet Information Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
|                                                                 
|/s/ Tang Yue                                                     
|Title: Legal Representative
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Standard Companies
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Frederic M. Poses, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report. /s/Frederic M. Poses  
 July 29, 2004
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA AF 06-0536

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPOINTMENT TO THE DISTRICT COURT COUNCIL ORDER

The term of District Court Council member the Honorable Gregory Todd expires on June 30,2021. Pursuant to § 3-1-1602, MCA, an election was held by the Montana Judges Association and Judge Todd as re-elected as the District Court Judge,Position 2 member to the Council, Now,therefore, I, Mike McGrath, Chief Justice ofthe Supreme Court ofthe State ofMontana,in accordance with the results ofsaid procedure,do hereby CERTIFY that the Honorable Gregory Todd was re-elected to the District Court Council as the District Court Judge,Position 2 member,to a three-year term expiring on June 30, 2024, The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to the Montana Secretary of State, to the Honorable Gregory Todd, to each member of the District Court Council, to the State Bar ofMontana,to Beth McLaughlin, Court Administrator, and to Shauna Ryan at the Office ofthe Supreme Court Administrator. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have set my hand and caused the seal ofthis Court to be affixed this `

11 21ay ofMay,2021.

ChiefJustice 

# FILED 'Airf 2 0 2021 05/20/2021

Case Number: AF 06-0536
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 1, 2019

No. 04-18-00411-CV

REPSOL OIL and Gas USA, LLC as successor of Talisman Energy USA Inc, Statoil Texas 

Onshore Properties, LLC, and Statoil Pipelines, LLC, and OGE, LLC,

Appellants

v.

MATRIX PETROLEUM, LLC, Matrix Petroleum Holdings LLC, JAR Resources Holdings, 

L.P., and TMRX Petroleum, LLC,

Appellees

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-08-00158-CVL

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

The court reporter, Leticia Escamilla, has filed a fifth notice of late record requesting 

another extension to file the reporter’s record. Our order granting Ms. Escamilla’s fourth request 

stated, “no further extensions will be granted without any new, extraordinary circumstances.” 

The extraordinary circumstances described in Ms. Escamilla’s fourth request included the size of 

the record. Contrary to our last order, Ms. Escamilla’s fifth request does not describe any new 

extraordinary circumstances. However, Ms. Escamilla’s request states all but a few of the sixtyvolume record have been completed, and she has the help of two other court reporters. She has 

requested an extension of time until February 11, 2019, to file the complete record.

Considering Ms. Escamilla’s request and the filings in this case, we grant the request in 

part. We ORDER Leticia Escamilla to file all completed volumes of the reporter’s record by 

Tuesday, February 5, 2019. We ORDER Ms. Escamilla to file the remaining volumes by 

February 14, 2019. Ms. Escamilla is advised that if she does not file the record by the dates 

ordered, she may be ordered to appear before this court and show why she should not be 

sanctioned or held in contempt for violating this order.
_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of February, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Alton R. HENRY, a/k/a Bajo, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-7215.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 2004.

Decided Dec. 21, 2004.

*886Alton Henry, Appellant pro se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Alton Henry, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) as a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), and dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); *Reid v. Angelone,*369 F.3d 363, 368-69, 374 n. 7 (4th Cir.2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Henry has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3951 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3951

   To amend title 10, United States Code, to require notification to 
    Congress and the public when waivers to certain domestic source 
             requirements are made, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2004

  Mr. Hayes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 10, United States Code, to require notification to 
    Congress and the public when waivers to certain domestic source 
             requirements are made, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO DOMESTIC SOURCE REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) Notice.--Section 2533a of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(k) Notification Required When Exceptions Applied.--Funds 
appropriated or otherwise available to the Department of Defense may 
not be used to enter into a contract to procure an item described in 
subsection (b) pursuant to an exception in this section (as set forth 
in subsections (c) through (h)) until--
            ``(1) a notification of the intent to apply such exception 
        is submitted to Congress and posted on the website maintained 
        by the General Services Administration known as FedBizOpps.gov 
        (or any successor site); and
            ``(2) a period of 15 days has expired after the date on 
        which such notification is so submitted and published.''.
    (b) Clothing Materials and Components Covered.--Subsection (b) of 
section 2533a of title 10, United States Code, is amended in paragraph 
(1)(B) by inserting before the semicolon the following: ``and the 
materials and components thereof''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.6.3

Eastern Division

United States of America

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04519

Honorable John Robert Blakey

Changlin Wu

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, July 7, 2022:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Based upon the filing

of the stipulation of dismissal [36], this case is dismissed with prejudice. Civil case

terminated. Mailed notice(gel, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04519 Document #: 37 Filed: 07/07/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:117
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 223 (Wednesday, November 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 68952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27403]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8952]


Notice of Meeting of Advisory Committee on International Law

    A meeting of the Department of State's Advisory Committee on 
International Law will take place on Monday, December 15, from 10:00 
a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at the George Washington University Law School, 
Michael K. Young Faculty Conference Center, 716 20th Street NW., 5th 
Floor, Washington, DC. Acting Legal Adviser Mary McLeod will chair the 
meeting, which will be open to the public up to the capacity of the 
conference room. The meeting will include discussions on a variety of 
international law topics.
    Members of the public who wish to attend should contact the Office 
of the Legal Adviser by December 11 at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fc90998e919d92969ebc8f889d8899d29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="274b42554a46494d4567545346534209404851">[email protected]</span></a> or 202-776-
8442 and provide their name, professional affiliation, address, and 
phone number. A valid photo ID is required for admission to the 
meeting. Attendees who require reasonable accommodation should make 
their requests by December 8. Late requests will be considered but 
might not be possible to accommodate.

    Dated: November 12, 2014.
Jonas Lerman,
Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, Executive Director, 
Advisory Committee on International Law, United States Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2014-27403 Filed 11-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Bussard, Appellee, *v.*Kennedy et al., Appellants.

(No. 1965

Decided January 12, 1948.)

*Mr. Clarence J. StoecMein,*for appellee.

*Mr. Drewey H. Wysong,*for appellants.

By the Court.

This cause is submitted on motion to dismiss the appeal because, first, the cause is not one in chancery, second, the only question raised is one at law and, third, appellants have failed to file assignments of error as required by Rule VII of this court.

In the notice of appeal it is stated that ‘ *‘*said appeal is on questions of law and fact.” This is a civil action, to recover a money judgment. Obviously this action is not appealable on questions of law and fact. The motion to dismiss the appeal on questions of law and fact will be sustained. Under Section 12223-22, General Code, this appeal shall stand as an appeal on questions of law.

The second ground of the motion is overruled as it raises a question of law.

The third ground of the motion is overruled, as the filing of assignments of error is not required so long *282as the appeal stands as an appeal on questions of law and fact.

When an appeal on questions of law and fact is ineffective and the case is retained as an appeal on questions of law, and no bill of exceptions has been filed, the reviewing court is required, under the provisions of Section 11564, General Code, to fix a time, which shall not exceed 30 days, for the preparation and settlement of the bill of exceptions.

The court orders the case to stand as an appeal on questions of law, and grants to appellants 30 days after the filing of the entry journalizing this decision within which to prepare and settle a bill of exceptions and file assignments of error and brief.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Wiseman, P. J., Miller and Hornbeck, JJ., concur.
#### Craven Garrett's Heirs *v.*Llewellyn Powell and Others.

Fraudulent Conveyances — Voluntary Conveyance — Bona Fide Purchaser— Notice — Actual and Constructive.

Constructive notice arising from the recording of a voluntary conveyance is not sufficient to effect the conscience of a bona fide purchaser. Actual notice is necessary for this purpose.

APPEAL FROM BULLITT CIRCUIT COURT.

January 21, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The appellants claim title to the land in controversy under a voluntary conveyance made in 1847, by their ancestor to Stilwell Heady in trust for himself for life, remainder to his wife, Sarah Garrett (now deceased), for life, and remainder to these appellants.

Their said ancestors afterwards, in 1851, sold and conveyed for a valuable consideration the same land to the appellee Powell, and Merker and Bergman claim under him.

Powell denies that at the time of his purchase he had notice of the existence of the voluntary conveyance under which appellants claim, and there is no proof in the record, except the fact *487that said conveyance was duly recorded, tending to establish this essential fact.

*Rodman, R. H. Field, Bush & M err ell, for appellants.*

*Dembits & Wehle, Bramlette, for appellees.*

Constructive notice arising from the recording of a voluntary conveyance is not sufficient to affect the conscience of the purchaser. Actual notice is necessary for this purpose. There may be constructice notice where there is no actual notice.

In this case it is not denied that Powell was a bona fide purchaser, and as he had no actual notice of the voluntary conveyance to Heady it must be regarded and treated as fraudulent as to him. *Enders vs. Williams,*1st Metcalfe, 353.

As appellants could not have held the land as against Powell and his vendees in any event, it is unnecessary to inquire whether the judgment in the case of *Garret vs. Heady*and others was regular or not. Its vacation would not have benefited them in the slightest degree. Judgment affirmed.
**Exhibit
      32.1**






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**






In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December
      31, 2006 of the Claymore MACROshares Oil Down Tradeable Trust (the
      "Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
      date
      hereof (the "Annual Report"), I, Samuel Masucci, III, principal executive
      officer of MACRO Securities Depositor, LLC, which acts as the depositor for
      the
      Registrant (the "Depositor"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
                Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Annual Report fairly represents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
                of the
                Registrant.






Date:
      April 2, 2007




/s/
                Samuel Masucci, IIISamuel
                Masucci, IIIChief
                Executive Officer,****MACRO
                Securities Depositor, LLC
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 7735

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ISAAC NELSON, a/k/a Big Ike, a/k/a Zeek , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. ( 3:09

- cr - 00930

- CMC

- 3 )

Submitted : April 27, 2021 Decided: April 30, 2021

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Isaac Nelson , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Isaac Nelson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse
of discretion. See United States v. Kibble , ___F.3d___, 2021 WL 1216543 (4th Cir. 2021). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district co urt. United States v. Nelson , No. 3:09

- cr - 00930

- CMC

- 3 (D.S.C. Nov. 9, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED