alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

ABC Corporation I et al,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS and 

UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS 

IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 1:20-cv-04806 

Judge: Honorable Thomas M. Durkin

DEFENDANT AND THIRD-PARTY RESPONDENTS’S MOTION 

TO STRIKE EXPERT REPORT OF PAUL HATCH

Comes Now, Defendant Gyroor-US (“Defendant” or “Gyroor-US”) and Third-Party

Respondents Gyroor, Urbanmax, GaodeshangUS, Fengchi-US, Gyroshoes, and HGSM (collectively, 

“Third-Party Respondents”) respectfully move the Court for an Order striking the report of Hangzhou 

Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. (“Chic”) and Unicorn Global, Inc.’s (“Unicorn”, and 

collectively with Chic, “Plaintiffs”) expert, Paul Hatch. After a lengthy phone discussion, the 

Parties were unable to reach an agreement regarding the briefing schedule. Defendant and ThirdParty Respondents propose the briefing schedule as follows, 

Response to Motion February 13

Reply February 16

Plaintiffs propose the briefing schedule as follows,

Response to Motion February 22

Reply March 1

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 645 Filed: 02/08/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:16535
In support of this Motion, Defendant and Third-Party Respondents herewith submit a 

Memorandum of Law.

Date: 02/08/2023 /s/ Yu-Hao Yao

Yu-Hao Yao, Esq.

Glacier Law LLP

910 S Lake Ave, Suite 910

Pasadena, CA 91101

mickey.yao@glacier.law

312-448-7772

Na Zhang, Esq

Glacier Law LLP

506 Second Ave., Ste 1516

Seattle, WA 98104

Na Zhang, Esq.

queena.zhang@glacier.law

206-397-8633

GLACIER LAW LLP

200 E. Randolph Dr., Ste. 5100

Chicago, IL 60601

Ruoting Men, Esq.

ruoting.men@glacier.law

Tianyu Ju, Esq.

Iris.ju@glacier.law

312-270-0413

GLACIER LAW LLP

41 Madison Avenue, Ste 2529

New York, NY 10010

Tao Liu, Esq.

Wei Wang, Esq.

Tao.liu@glacier.law

wei.wang@glacier.law

332-777-7315

Attorneys for Defendant and Third-Party 

Respondents

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 645 Filed: 02/08/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:16536
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this February 8, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing file with 

the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, and service was perfected on all counsel of record 

and interested parties through this system, which will deliver a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing documents via CM/ECF.

Date: 02/08/2023

 

/s/ Yu-Hao Yao 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 645 Filed: 02/08/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:16537
NO. 07-09-0118-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

MAY 13, 2009

______________________________

CERTAIN PRIMARY UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S, LONDON AND 

CERTAIN EXCESS UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S LONDON, APPELLANTS

V.

HERRING BANK, F/K/A HERRING NATIONAL BANK, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 91,926-B; HONORABLE JOHN B. BOARD, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before this Court is Appellants’ Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal. By

the motion, Appellants represent that the parties have reached a settlement and request

that this appeal be dismissed with costs to be assessed against Appellants.
2

Without passing on the merits of the case, Appellants’ motion is granted and the

appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. Pursuant to the motion, costs are taxed

against Appellants. Having dismissed the appeal at the request of Appellants, no motion

for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Also pending in this Court is a motion for extension of time in which to file the clerk’s

record. Our disposition of this appeal renders that motion moot.

Patrick A. Pirtle

 Justice
F.P Hall, H. Insley, E.M. Levin, H.F. McMurdie, C.R. Robbins
#### Charles D. Hale v. Township Board of the Township of Baldwin.

*Townships*— Appm'tionment *of indebtedness on bonds*— Bona *fide purchasers.*

A township issued plahk-road bonds which were invalid. The bonds were negotiated and the township was afterwards divided. *Held*that the judgment in a subsequent action on the bonds to which the new township was not a party, was not binding on it; and *mandamus*will not lie to compel the township board of the new township to meet with the township board of the old one, to apportion the indebtedness arising on the bonds. .

*271Purchasers of bonds cannot be considered *5ona fide*holders if after their purchase an action is brought upon the bonds and judgment recovered by the payees named in the coupons.

Mandamus.

Submitted Oct. 5.

Denied Oct. 18.

*A. McDonell*for relator.

*Kcmehett <& Stark*for respondent.

Marston, J.

This is an application by the relator for a mandamus to compel the respondent to meet with the township board of Tawas and adjust and apportion all existing indebtedness between said towns growing out of certain bonds issued by the township of Tawas in aid of a certain plank-road company, while the territory now in the township of Baldwin formed a part of the township of Tawas.

The invalidity of the bonds at the time they were issued is substantially admitted by the relator, and there can be no doubt but that such was the fact. The relator claims, and bases his right to the writ, that prior to the division of the territory these bonds were negotiated to and are still held by *bona fide*holders.

It affirmatively and clearly appears by the record, that the payees named in the coupons commenced action in the United States court in their own names to recover the ■amount thereof in 1874, several years after the new township of Baldwin was organized. This most effectively and •conclusively disposes of the claim made that these bonds were negotiated and held by *bona fide*holders. How the plaintiffs in those suits were enabled, under such circumstances, to recover judgment upon such coupons we need not attempt to ascertain, and in any event the respondent not being a party in those cases would not be bound by the judgment. *Pierson v.*Reynolds, ante 224.

"We are of opinion that the- relator has not made such ■a case as will entitle him to the writ, and the same will be •denied.

The other Justices concurred.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04699

Honorable John Z. Lee

TikTok Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, November 23, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Motion for extension of time

until 12/18/20 to file a consolidated amended complaint [106] is granted. The status report

deadline and status hearing date will stand.Mailed notice(ca, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 107 Filed: 11/23/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1862
#### H. C. Melone *v.*J. F. McDowell.

Sheriffs and Constables — Action on Sheriff’s Bond — Pleading.

In an action on a sheriff’s bond for damages for negligence of the sheriff in serving an attachment isuimmons, the plaintiff should state that the principal defendant was at the time insolvent, and that by reason of such failure to serve the summons the insolvent defendant collected the debt sought to be attached, and that the debt was lost to plaintiff because of -the negligence of the sheriff in serving the summon®.

APPEAL FROM SHELBY CIRCUIT COURT.

December 29, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

Although Dobyns may have been insolvent on the 14th of November, 1870, and even after the 18th of November of that year, and no part of the debt then owing by him to appellee had been paid, still, as this action was not brought for more than one year after the failure of appellant to execute the summons and order of attachment on Campbell, Dobyns may have in the meantime become solvent, or for anything that is averred in the petition he may have been paid the debt to him. To make out a cause of action appellee should have averred that said debt was still owing by Dobyns to him and unpaid, and that by the failure of appellee to execute the summons and attachment he had failed to make the $152 of his debt, the amount Campbell owed Dobyns. The statement, that by the failure and\ refusal of appellant to' discharge his duty, he damaged the plaintiff in the sum of $152 is not sufficient — that is a mere conclusion of the pleader. He should have stated if the fact was so, that Dobyns was then insolvent; that his debt was unpaid, and by the failure of appellant to execute the summons and *170attachment on Campbell, Dobyns collected $152, the amount Campbell owed him, and by reason of Dobyns’s continued insolvency he had. lost said sum.

*Harwood, for appellant.*

*L. A. Weakley, for appellee.*

Without an allegation of the non-payment of the money by Dob-yns to appellee proof of the fact would not avail him.

The allegation, as made in the petition and heretofore quoted, would at most entitle appellee to nominal damages only.

Nor does the answer cure the defect in. the petition; there is no admission therein contained, either direct or inferential, that Dob-yns owed the debt to’ appellee, when he instituted his action.

Wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to award a new trial, and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. If appellant should apply within proper time for permission to amend his petition he should be allowed to do so.
Active surface plasmon photonics

Pierre Berini1,2,3

1

School of Information Technology and Engineering

University of Ottawa

161 Louis Pasteur, Ottawa ON, K1N 6N5, Canada

berini@site.uottawa.ca

2Department of Physics

University of Ottawa

3

Spectalis Corporation

PO Box 72029, Kanata North RPO, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Active structures for the amplification and detection of surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) are 

presented and discussed. The amplification of SPPs propagating along planar metallic 

waveguides occurs due to interaction with an adjacent optically-pumped dipolar gain medium. 

Physically realisable arrangements based on the single-interface and on symmetric thin metal 

films and stripes are described, along with the conditions required to achieve complete SPP loss 

compensation and SPP gain at visible and infrared wavelengths. The detection of SPPs is 

achieved using a Schottky contact detector implemented as a thin metal stripe on silicon; SPPs 

are launched along the stripe via end-fire coupling at energies below the band gap of silicon 

(infrared wavelengths) and are detected via internal photoemission.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Northwestern Mineral
Ventures Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge,
that:

         (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the
         fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with
         the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of
         the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: June 29, 2006
                              /s/ Marek Kreczmer
                             --------------------------
                             Marek Kreczmer
                             President and Chief Executive
                             Officer

The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
```
#### E. F. King’s Adm’r, etc., *v.*Wm. Evans.

Pleading — Partnership Accounting — Discovery.

A petition for a partnership accounting which leaves blanks where numbers ought to be inserted, so that judgment can not be entered thereon, is insufficient, and does not entitle the plaintiff to compel defendant to make discovery as to the doings of the partnership, and upon failure of plaintiff to fill up the blanks' within a reasonable time, the petition should be dismissed.

APPEAL FROM WHITLEY CIRCUIT COURT.

December 16, 1872.

*115Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

This cause seems to have been' commenced and prosecuted upon the idea that pleadings are altogether unnecessary.

The paper styled the petition recites that a partnership in the purchase and sale of hogs and cattle existed in the year 1855, between the plaintiff and defendants. That the partners were equally bound for the debts of the firm, that they were to receive equal portions of the profits, and to sustain in equal proportions the losses. The plaintiff undertakes to give a statement of the partnership operations, and does so by stating that-head of hogs and-head of cattle were purchased for-dollars; that they were sold for $-, that the expense amounted' to $-, and that upon settlement the defendants are indebted to him in the sum of $-, for which he prays judgment. There are many other amounts left blank which for the purposes of this opinion it is not necessary that we should' notice. If no answer had been filed it is manifest that no judgment could have been rendered upon this petition. There is nothing in it tO' be taken for confessed, and the answer when filed throws little or no light upon the matters involved. In the main the appellants leave blank the amounts alleged to have been paid out or received by them. Such pleading ought not to be tolerated. It is not the business of the courts to' hear all evidence that may be offered, and1 from it to malee up the pleadings for the parties.

Appellee had no right to ask the chancellor to compel the appellants to make discovery as to the acts and doings as partners until he came into court with a petition upon, which a judgment might be rendered when the discovery was made. With the pleadings in their present condition it is impossible that a settlement even approximately correct can be made.

Wherefore the judgments appealed from are reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to1 require the parties litigant to fill up the blanks in their pleadings, and in case the appellee fails within a reasonable time to perfect his petition it should be dismissed.

In case the defects in the pleadings shall be cured the cause should be referred to' the master, who will make up his report *116from the pleadings, the proof now in the case, and such other proof as the parties may offer.

*G. Pearl, for appellants.*

*Dishnum, for appellee.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          34,990
<SECURITIES>                                    16,127
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,656
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (746)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,442
<PP&E>                                          12,290
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,185)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,111
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,273
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,672
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,111
<SALES>                                         15,332
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,332
<CGS>                                            4,020
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (18)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,149)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,397
<INCOME-TAX>                                       461
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                936
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       936
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06


</TABLE>
H. Res. 42

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 6, 1997.

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and that

he is hereby, elected to the following standing committee of

the House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE: Mr. Brown of California.

In lieu of the Members elected in H. Res. 36 to the following committees, the following Members:

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Mr. LaFalce, Mr.

Skelton, Mr. Sisisky, Mr. Flake, Mr. Poshard, Ms. Velazquez,

Mr. Luther, Mr. Baldacci, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, Ms.

Millender-McDonald, Mr. Weygand, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr.

Boyd, Ms. McCarthy of New York, Mr. Pascrell, and Mr.

Goode.

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS: Mr. Evans, Mr.

Kennedy of Massachusetts, Mr. Filner, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr.

Bishop, Mr. Clyburn, Ms. Brown of Florida, Mr. Doyle, Mr.
2

•HRES 42 EH

Mascara, Mr. Peterson of Minnesota, Mrs. Carson, Mr.

Reyes, and Mr. Snyder.

Attest:

Clerk.
PURCHASE AGREEMENT



 Exhibit 10.4 
  
 [SUCCESS from HOME LOGO] 
  
 September 27, 2005 
  
 Sam Caster 
 Mannatech, Inc. 
 600 South Royal Lane 
 Suite 200 
 Coppell, TX 75019 
  
 Dear Sam,

  
 This letter is to signify the intent for VideoPlus to feature Mannatech, Inc.
in the April 2006 issue of Success from Home magazine. 
  
 Terms:


	 	•	 	This magazine will appear in bookstores nationwide (including Barnes & Noble, Borders, Books-a-Million, B. Dalton and Hastings) from April 1st 2006 until April 30th 2006. 


	 	•	 	Mannatech agrees to purchase a minimum of 100,000 copies at $3.50 each. 


	 	•	 	Each copy of the magazine will include a DVD which will be duplicated by VideoPlus at VideoPlus expense. 


	 	•	 	VideoPlus will bear all reasonable production costs for the Magazine only. 


	 	•	 	Mannatech will work with VideoPlus to develop a Table of Contents for the magazine and provide access to resource material, interview subjects and photography where possible.



	 	•	 	Mannatech will be able to review content and participate in content development relating to Mannatech prior to publication date (this includes everything except for the personal
development and third party content for that specific issue – although Mannatech may participate in selecting contributors and subjects for this content). 


	 	•	 	Mannatech will select distributors profiled and interviewed for the magazine. 

  

This Agreement is being emailed and a hard copy mailed to your office in Coppell, TX. Please print two (2) copies of this Agreement, sign and return one (1) copy both
by FAX (940-497-9914) and by mail to me at the following address: 
  
 Stuart Johnson 
 President 
 VideoPlus, Inc. 
 200 Swisher Road 
 Lake Dallas, TX 75065 
  
 We look forward to working with Mannatech on this project. 
  
 Sincerely, 
  

			
	 /s/ Stuart
Johnson                                    
 Stuart Johnson
 President and CEO
 VideoPlus
  
 cc
 Steve Lemme – by email
 Deborah Heisz – by email
	 	 /s/ Sam
Caster                                       
  
 Sam Caster
 Mannatech, Inc.
  
 Date:    9-27-05                                
        


  

 1
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 41429 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. LUIS JAVIER CANTU

- MORENO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:14

- CR

- 1375

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Luis Javier Cantu

- Moreno raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Martinez

Lugo , 782 F.3d 198, 204

- 05 (5th Cir. 2015) , petition for cert. filed (June 19, 2015) (No. 14

- 10355) . In Ma rtinez

- Lugo , 782 F.3d at 204

- 05, we held that an enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) for a prior conviction of a drug trafficking offense is warranted regardless whether the conviction for the prior

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 2 2 , 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-41429 Document: 00513241889 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/22/2015No. 14

- 41429

2 offense required proof of remuneration or comm ercial activity. Accordingly, Cantu

- Moreno’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 14-41429 Document: 00513241889 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/22/2015
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Standard Companies
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Frederic M. Poses, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

/s/ Frederic M. Poses
Frederic M. Poses
Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2002