alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SAMPLE BALLOT

DELAWARE GENERAL ELECTION

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 1998

FEDERAL AND STATEWIDE OFFICES

FOR

We
re =
. *« Me fe x *
WRITE IN a *- se S
COLUMN OFFICE book re NS
DEMOCRATIC REPUBLICAN LIBERTARIAN NATURAL LAW REFORM US TAXPAYERS
PARTY PARTY PARTY PARTY PARTY PARTY
Dennis E. Williams Michael N. Castle Kim Stanley Bemis James P. Webster
FOR
REPRESENTATIVE 3329 Rockfield Drive ~ 2001 Kentmere Pky. 7 Mariner's Lane 8 Arbor Drive
IN CONGRESS Wilmington, DE 19810 Wilmington, DE 19806 Ocean View, DE 19970 Dover, DE 19904
736-1666 677-0478
John T, Dorsey M. Jane Brady
eo ee 1918 Thomas Road 1543 Savannah Road
Wilmington, DE 19803 Lewes, DE 19958
427-7452 645-6542
Jack Markell Janet C. Rzewnicki
sii 3 Guyenne Road 233 Unami Trail
STATE TREASURER

Wilmington, DE 19807
571-1835

Newark, DE 19711
739-3382

FOR AUDITOR OF
ACCOUNTS

Dianne M. Kempski

304 Maryann Drive
Wilmington, DE 19804
999-0833

R. Thomas Wagner, Jr.

141 Hazel Road
Dover, DE 19901
735-8765

October 21, 1998 (6:49AM)

U:\ecolhiv\ballot\NKSC-FED com page 1.wpd
Exhibit 12
                          MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                              (Dollars in Millions)


                                        Years Ended December 31
                              ---------------------------------------------
                               1996      1995      1994      1993      1992
                              ------    ------    ------    ------    -----

EARNINGS
  Earnings (loss) from
   continuing operations
   before income taxes
   and cumulative effect
   of accounting change     $1,223     ($750)    $  920   $  459    $1,086

    ADD: Interest expense      248       225        249      215       468
         Interest factor
           in rents             53        32         35       39        57
         Amortization of
           capitalized
           interest              1         1          1        1         2
                            -------   -------    -------  -------   -------
                            $1,525     ($492)    $1,205   $  714    $1,613
                            =======   =======    =======  =======   =======




FIXED CHARGES
  Interest expense            $248      $225       $249     $215      $468
  Capitalized interest                                         2
  Interest factor in rents      53        32         35       39        57
                            -------   -------    -------   ------   -------
                              $301      $257       $284     $256      $525
                            =======   =======    =======   ======   =======


Ratio of earnings to fixed
  charges                     5.1X      (A)        4.2X     2.8X      3.1X
                            =======   =======    =======   ======   =======


(A)  For the year ended December 31, 1995, earnings were inadequate to
     cover fixed charges.  The amount of such deficiency for the period
     was $749 million.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          26,567
<SECURITIES>                                   418,842
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               448,909
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 448,909
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,892
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           11,200
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,241
<OTHER-SE>                                     359,576
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   448,909
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                40,543
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 737
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (35,089)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (35,089)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
                                              

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 2355** 

MARLOW L. BATES, SR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; SONY CORP OF AMERICA; L G ELECTRONICS USA, INC.; MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC & ELECTRONICS USA INC.; PANASONIC ELECTRIC WORKS CORP. OF AMERICA , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. J. Frederick Motz , Senior District Judge. ( 1:10

- cv - 03158

- JFM )

Submitted : September 17, 2012 Decided: September 27, 2012

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Marlow L. Bates, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. James B. Astrachan, Daniel P. Doty, Julie Rebecca Rubin, ASTRACHAN GUNST AND THOMAS PC, Baltimore, Maryland; David Ira Ackerman, SNR DENTON US LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Marlow L. Bates, Sr., appeals the district cou rt ’ s order s dismissing his copyright infringement suit for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and denying his post

- judgment motion for leave to amend his complaint . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accord ingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bates v. Samsung Electronics Am., Inc. , No. 1:10

- cv - 0 3 158

- JFM (D. Md. July 20, 2011 & Dec. 1, 2011). We further deny Bates’ motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral

a rgument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Pickering

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A be grounds to dismiss the appeal); 

### see also Varnum v. Grady, 90 Nev. 374,

376-77, 528 P.2d 1027, 1028-29 (1974) (dismissing appeal for failure to timely file record on appeal).

It is so ORDERED. Parraguirre r , J. J. Saitta cc: Hon. Robert Teuton, District Judge, Family Court Division Valarie I. Fujii & Associates Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division Eighth District Court Clerk

2
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3806 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3806

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a credit against 
    the alternative minimum tax where stock acquired pursuant to an 
         incentive stock option is sold or exchanged at a loss.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 2004

  Mr. Gerlach (for himself, Mr. English, Mr. Gillmor, and Mr. Ehlers) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a credit against 
    the alternative minimum tax where stock acquired pursuant to an 
         incentive stock option is sold or exchanged at a loss.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CREDIT AGAINST THE ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX WHERE STOCK 
              ACQUIRED PURSUANT TO AN INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION IS SOLD OR 
              EXCHANGED AT A LOSS.

    (a) In General.--Section 53 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to credit for prior year minimum tax liability) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) Special Rule in Case of Incentive Stock Options.--
            ``(1) In general.--The amount determined under subsection 
        (c) for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2003, 
        shall be not less than the incentive stock option tax.
            ``(2) Incentive stock option tax.--For purposes of this 
        subsection, the term `incentive stock option tax' means the 
        excess (if any) of--
                    ``(A) the aggregate tax imposed by section 55 by 
                reason of section 56(b)(3) for all prior taxable years 
                with respect to stock if--
                            ``(i) such stock is sold or exchanged 
                        during the taxable year or any prior taxable 
                        year, and
                            ``(ii) a loss is recognized on such sale or 
                        exchange for purposes of part VI, over
                    ``(B) the aggregate increase in the amount 
                determined under subsection (c) by reason of this 
                subsection for all prior taxable years.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2003.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Benjamin Garner, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04693

Honorable John Z. Lee

Allstate Insurance Company

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, November 2, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: The Court has reviewed the

status report and understands that there is a pending motion to dismiss/stay. Nevertheless,

the Court believes that discovery should proceed and enters the following schedule. The

parties are to exchange Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures by 11/20/20. Initial written discovery

should be issued by 12/1/21. The deadline to amend pleadings and join parties is 2/19/21.

The deadline for the competition of fact discovery is 8/23/21.The Court orders the parties

to file a joint written status report by 1/7/21. The report, which shall be as concise as

possible, shall set forth: (1) the current deadlines imposed by the Court and whether the

matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge in any fashion (e,g., for discovery

supervision; for resolution of a motion; for settlement; etc.); (2) the progress of discovery,

if discovery is ongoing; (3) the status of briefing on unresolved motions, if any; (4)

whether the parties have engaged or are engaging in settlement discussions and the status

of those discussions; (5) for cases without any future court dates, an agreed proposed

schedule; (6) for cases that have future court dates and if the parties believe there is good

cause to extend the current deadlines, a proposed amended schedule and the basis for the

request; (7) a request for any agreed action that the Court can take without a hearing; (8)

and whether the parties believe a telephonic hearing or in−person hearing is necessary

within the next 60 days, and, if so, the issue(s) that warrants discussion and the parties'

respective positions. Mailed notice(ca, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04693 Document #: 23 Filed: 11/02/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:86
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 223 (Wednesday, November 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 68895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27341]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated 
Program Project Applications (P01).
    Date: December 12, 2014.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fisher Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Jane K. Battles, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 5601 Fisher's Lane, 
Room 3F30B, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-669-5029, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#debcbfaaaab2bbadb4bf9eb3bfb7b2f0b0b7b6f0b9b1a8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="10727164647c75637a71507d71797c3e7e79783e777f66">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS).

     Dated: November 12, 2014.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-27341 Filed 11-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 224 (Thursday, November 20, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 69118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27479]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than December 15, 2014.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Chapelle Davis, Assistant Vice 
President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. IBERIABANK Corporation, Lafayette, Louisiana, to merge with Old 
Florida Bancshares, Inc., Orlando, Florida, and thereby acquire its two 
subsidiaries, Old Florida Bank and New Traditions Bank, both in 
Orlando, Florida.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 17, 
2014.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-27479 Filed 11-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
EXHIBIT 36

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 328-36 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:7666
Document title: Amazon.com Seller Profile: yutongcheng-us

Capture URL: https://www.amazon.com/sp?_encoding=UTF8&asin=&isAmazonFulfilled=&isCBA=&marketplaceID=ATVPDKIKX0DER&orderID...

Capture timestamp (UTC): Wed, 19 May 2021 03:11:41 GMT Page 1 of 2

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 328-36 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:7667
Document title: Amazon.com Seller Profile: yutongcheng-us

Capture URL: https://www.amazon.com/sp?_encoding=UTF8&asin=&isAmazonFulfilled=&isCBA=&marketplaceID=ATVPDKIKX0DER&orderID...

Capture timestamp (UTC): Wed, 19 May 2021 03:11:41 GMT Page 2 of 2

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 328-36 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:7668
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 469 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 469

    Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding 
   assistance to Mexico to combat wildfires, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 11, 1998

    Mr. Hall of Texas (for himself, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Hinojosa, Mr. 
 Bentsen, Mr. DeLay, Mr. Filner, Mr. Smith of Oregon, Mr. Archer, Mr. 
    Rohrabacher, Mr. Brady of Texas, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Ortiz, Mr. 
McGovern, Mr. Pastor, Mr. Kolbe, Mr. Bonilla, Mr. Barton of Texas, Mr. 
 Sandlin, Mr. Frost, Mr. Skeen, Mr. Manton, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Redmond, 
   Mr. Armey, Mr. Stenholm, and Mr. Turner) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International 
                               Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding 
   assistance to Mexico to combat wildfires, and for other purposes.

Whereas fires in Mexico and Central America have burned over 1,000,000 acres in 
        recent weeks;
Whereas the severe drought causing the fires shows no signs of ending;
Whereas smoke from these fires has spread to the United States, and the 
        pollution caused by the smoke will likely lead to an increased incidence 
        of respiratory health problems;
Whereas the United States has a Cooperative Fire Suppression Agreement with 
        Canada to address the issue of fires occurring along the border between 
        the two countries;
Whereas in the past fires starting in Mexico have grown out of control and have 
        spread into the United States; and
Whereas both the United States Forest Service and the Mexican Forest Service 
        have expressed an interest in having a cooperative fire suppression 
        agreement between the United States and Mexico: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. SENSE OF THE HOUSE REGARDING ASSISTANCE TO MEXICO TO COMBAT 
              WILDFIRES.

    It is the sense of the House of Representatives that the President 
of the United States should provide, from funds available for such 
purposes, the necessary assistance to Mexico, including disaster relief 
assistance, to extinguish the wildfires currently burning in Mexico and 
Central America.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF THE HOUSE REGARDING A COOPERATIVE FIRE SUPPRESSION 
              AGREEMENT WITH MEXICO.

    It is further the sense of the House of Representatives that the 
United States should initiate negotiations with Mexico at the earliest 
date possible in order to come to a mutually beneficial agreement as 
soon as possible addressing the concerns of both countries in 
suppressing fires occurring along the border between the two countries.
                                 <all>
```
#### John A. Bogie *v.*M. B. Moore, Etc.

Executions — Levy and Sale — Quashal of Levy and Sale — Return on Execution Should Be Quashed.

Where the levy of an execution on land and the sale thereunder has 'been quashed, the sheriff’s return on the execution should be quashed also.

APPEAL FROM BATH CIRCUIT COURT.

February 4, 1873.

/. *S. Hurt, for appellant.*

*Apperson & Reid, for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The writing executed and delivered to the sheriff by M. B. Moore on the 30th of September, 1871, authorized the levy subsequently made on fifty acres of land therein described, and the fact that other lands as well as personal property were also seized under the execution does not render the levy on the land invalid. Nor can Moore or those representing him be heard to. say that because he was not invested1 with the legal title when the levy was made that it shall therefore be set aside. *Gohegan v. Ditto,*2d Met. 437.

Baird, the purchaser, does not appeal from the judgment quashing the levy, and sale. Nor does Bogie make him a party to the appeal at all, as the purchaser does not complain at being deprived of the benefit of his purchase.

We are not inclined in view of the irregular action of the sheriff to disturb the judgmlent quashing the sale, but as to. the levy the judgment is certainly prejudicial to the substantial rights of Bogie.

As the case now stands, the levy and sale are quashed, and Baird is thereby released from! the payment of his bond, whilst the sheriff’s return, showing the satisfaction of Bogie’s execution, remains undisturbed.

The judgment quashing the levy is reversed and the cause remanded, with instructions to overrule appellees’ motion to the extent indicated, and also to. set aside so much of the sheriff’s return, as gives Moore credit by the amount for which the land sold.

The parties will thereby be remanded to the position occupied by each of them before the sale, and Bogie will have the right to. proceed to enforce his levy.