alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                          $        53
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                         1,194
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          0
<PP&E>                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        1,247
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    81
<BONDS>                               1,166
<COMMON>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          1,247
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          0
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           0
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                              0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.00
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                          65,583
<SECURITIES>                                    35,077
<RECEIVABLES>                                  187,147
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,751
<INVENTORY>                                     84,924
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               406,568
<PP&E>                                         149,347
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,676
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 553,592
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          164,221
<BONDS>                                         65,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       157,271
<OTHER-SE>                                     167,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   553,592
<SALES>                                        163,214
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               163,214
<CGS>                                           73,283
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   73,283
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                58,220
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,188
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,742
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,792
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,950
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,950
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .60
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a),

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Principal Executive Officer

I, Paul E. Berger, M.D., certify that:

1. I have reviewed
this annual report on Form 10-K of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 5, 2007



/s/    PAUL E. BERGER,
M.D.Paul E. Berger, M.D.Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

not on t&u 8bor 

our rouaty purchaud 

portloa therooi, OquBl to ten month. 

90 roul4 8pproairte hour. oplnloo u to uhather or not t& oount~ 18 authorlrul to rcfuod to the 

owner of tin paormge *tore permit the ~qortlomte 

part or tha tu pad :barefar when retG purmlt her 

beoo saacolld ulthln tro Pnatha after ita imu- 

-01 cob a new permit taimn out end tbo full JOTS 

tu pie on raid aov pormit.m
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 64

Requiring that travel awards that accrue by reason of official travel of

a Member, officer, or employee of the House of Representatives be

used only with respect to official travel.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 13, 1997

Mr. BARRETT of Wisconsin (for himself, Mr. LUTHER, and Mr. MCHALE)

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on House Oversight

RESOLUTION

Requiring that travel awards that accrue by reason of official

travel of a Member, officer, or employee of the House

of Representatives be used only with respect to official

travel.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON USE OF TRAVEL AWARDS.

3 Notwithstanding any provision of law or any rule,

4 regulation, or other authority, any travel award that ac5 crues by reason of official travel of a Member, officer, or

6 employee of the House of Representatives may be used

7 only with respect to official travel.
2

•HRES 64 IH

1 SEC. 2. REGULATIONS.

2 The Committee on House Oversight of the House of

3 Representatives shall have authority to prescribe regula4 tions to carry out this resolution.

5 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

6 As used in this resolution—

7 (1) the term ‘‘travel award’’ means any fre8 quent flier mileage, free travel, discounted travel, or

9 other travel benefit, whether awarded by coupon,

10 membership, or otherwise; and

11 (2) the term ‘‘official travel’’ means, with re12 spect to the House of Representatives, travel per13 formed for the conduct of official business of the

14 House of Representatives.

Æ
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of SFSB Holding Company (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "report"),  we,  Barbara J.
Mallen,  President ,and Joseph E. Gallagher,  Chief Financial Officer,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Barbara J. Mallen                          /s/ Joseph E. Gallagher
---------------------------------              ---------------------------------
Barbara J. Mallen                              Joseph E. Gallagher
President                                       Chief Financial Officer




August 13, 2002
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-144846) pertaining to the Polypore International, Inc. 2006
Stock Option Plan and the Polypore International, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated March 6, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Polypore International, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Polypore International, Inc., included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended January 3, 2009.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Charlotte,
North Carolina
March 6, 2009

---



QuickLinks
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4536

_____________________________
L AURI B URRIS , G REGORY F. B URRIS , D OUGLAS O. R OWE , R ONALD E. B ROWN , J R ., J ACOB C HAPMAN , and M ELISSA B URRIS ,
Petitioners
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

— Original Jurisdiction.

June 20, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
D ENIED

. W OLF , O STERHAUS , and W INSOR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Mitchell A. Stone, Jacksonville Beach, H. Franklin Robbins, Jr., Orlando, and Steven G. Mason, Altamonte Springs
, for Petitioners

. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
**EXHIBIT 12.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Richard F. Lark, Jr., certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of GOL LINHAS AÉREAS INTELIGENTES S.A.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 1, 2017

By:               /s/ *Richard F. Lark, Jr.*
CHIPS R&D STANDARDS SUMMIT

CO-HOST ORGANIZATIONS

• CHIPS for America includes the CHIPS Program 

Office, responsible for semiconductor incentives, 

and the CHIPS Research and Development Office, 

responsible for R&D programs. Both sit within the 

National Institute of Standards and Technology 

(NIST) at the Department of Commerce.

• The American National Standards Institute

(ANSI) is a private, non-profit organization that 

administers and coordinates the U.S. voluntary 

standards and conformity assessment system. 

• The IEEE Industry Standards and Technology 

Organization (ISTO) was established in January 

1999 as a federation of member alliance 

programs with the aim of supporting accelerated 

technology standards development and market 

adoption for industry.

• IPC International is a non-profit, member-driven 

organization and leading source for industry 

standards, training, industry intelligence, solutions, 

and public policy advocacy. IPC is the global 

association that helps OEMs, EMS, PCB, advanced 

packaging manufacturers and suppliers build 

electronics better. There are more than 3,200 

companies around the world that depend on IPC 

programs and services to further their competitive 

advantage and financial success.

• The International Electronics Manufacturing 

Initiative (iNEMI) is a not-for-profit consortium 

that roadmaps the future technology requirements 

of the global electronics industry, identifies and 

prioritizes technology and infrastructure gaps, 

and helps eliminate those gaps through timely, 

high-impact deployment projects.

• The Joint Development Foundation provides 

the corporate and legal infrastructure to 

enable groups to quickly establish and operate 

lightweight collaborations to develop technical 

specifications, standards, and source code.

• The Networking and Information Technology 

Research and Development (NITRD) Program 

coordinates and promotes Federal R&D in 

advanced computing, artificial intelligence, 

microelectronics, networking, and information 

technology by leveraging federally funded R&D to 

address the Nation’s most critical priorities.

• The National Nanotechnology Coordination 

Office (NNCO) conducts public engagement on 

behalf of the National Nanotechnology Initiative 

(NNI) and provides technical and administrative 

support to the Nanoscale Science, Engineering, 

and Technology (NSET) Subcommittee and the 

interagency nanotechnology community.

• SEMI is the global industry association representing 

the electronics manufacturing and design supply 

chain, connecting more than 2,500 members and 

1.3 million professionals worldwide. 

• The Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA) 

is the voice of the U.S. semiconductor industry—

working with Congress, the Administration, and 

key industry stakeholders to encourage policy and 

regulation that fuel innovation, propel business, 

and drive international competition.
SUBROUTINE EV1PPF(P,PPF)
C
C     PURPOSE--THIS SUBROUTINE COMPUTES THE PERCENT POINT
C              FUNCTION VALUE FOR THE EXTREME VALUE TYPE 1
C              DISTRIBUTION.
C              THE EXTREME VALUE TYPE 1 DISTRIBUTION USED
C              HEREIN HAS MEAN = EULER'S NUMBER = 0.57721566
C              AND STANDARD DEVIATION = PI/SQRT(6) = 1.28254983.
C              THIS DISTRIBUTION IS DEFINED FOR ALL X
C              AND HAS THE PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION
C              F(X) = (EXP(-X)) * (EXP(-(EXP(-X))))
C              NOTE THAT THE PERCENT POINT FUNCTION OF A DISTRIBUTION 
C              IS IDENTICALLY THE SAME AS THE INVERSE CUMULATIVE
C              DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION OF THE DISTRIBUTION.
C     INPUT  ARGUMENTS--P      = THE SINGLE PRECISION VALUE 
C                                (BETWEEN 0.0 (EXCLUSIVELY) 
C                                AND 1.0 (EXCLUSIVELY))
C                                AT WHICH THE PERCENT POINT 
C                                FUNCTION IS TO BE EVALUATED.
C     OUTPUT ARGUMENTS--PPF    = THE SINGLE PRECISION PERCENT
C                                POINT FUNCTION VALUE.
C     OUTPUT--THE SINGLE PRECISION PERCENT POINT FUNCTION . 
C             VALUE PPF FOR THE EXTREME VALUE TYPE 1 DISTRIBUTION
C             WITH MEAN = EULER'S NUMBER = 0.57721566
C             AND STANDARD DEVIATION = PI/SQRT(6) = 1.28254983.
C     PRINTING--NONE UNLESS AN INPUT ARGUMENT ERROR CONDITION EXISTS. 
C     RESTRICTIONS--P SHOULD BE BETWEEN 0.0 (EXCLUSIVELY)
C                   AND 1.0 (EXCLUSIVELY).
C     OTHER DATAPAC   SUBROUTINES NEEDED--NONE.
C     FORTRAN LIBRARY SUBROUTINES NEEDED--ALOG.
C     MODE OF INTERNAL OPERATIONS--SINGLE PRECISION.
C     LANGUAGE--ANSI FORTRAN. 
C     REFERENCES--JOHNSON AND KOTZ, CONTINUOUS UNIVARIATE
C                 DISTRIBUTIONS--1, 1970, PAGES 272-295.
C     WRITTEN BY--JAMES J. FILLIBEN
C                 STATISTICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY (205.03)
C                 NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS
C                 WASHINGTON, D. C. 20234
C                 PHONE:  301-921-2315
C     ORIGINAL VERSION--NOVEMBER  1975. 
C
C---------------------------------------------------------------------
C
      IPR=6
C
C     CHECK THE INPUT ARGUMENTS FOR ERRORS
C
      IF(P.LE.0.0.OR.P.GE.1.0)GOTO50
      GOTO90
   50 WRITE(IPR,1)
      WRITE(IPR,46)P
      PPF=0.0
      RETURN
   90 CONTINUE
    1 FORMAT(1H ,115H***** FATAL ERROR--THE FIRST  INPUT ARGUMENT TO THE
     1 EV1PPF SUBROUTINE IS OUTSIDE THE ALLOWABLE (0,1) INTERVAL *****)
   46 FORMAT(1H , 35H***** THE VALUE OF THE ARGUMENT IS ,E15.8,6H *****)
C
C-----START POINT-----------------------------------------------------
C
      PPF=-ALOG(ALOG(1.0/P))
C
      RETURN
      END
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION

WAYNE FARMS LLC ) Civil Action No.: 20-5191

 )

Plaintiff, ) Judge Feinerman

v. )

 ) Magistrate Judge Valdez

JOHN DOE, A/KA GRACIE, )

HENDERSON, A/K/A FRANK L )

ANNESE and LINKEDIN )

CORPORATION )

 )

Defendants 

NOTICE OF FILING

TO: JOHN DOE a/k/a GRACIE HENDERSON a/k/a

FRANK L ANNESE

patrickwaynefarms@consultant.com 

patrickwaynefarms@outlook.com 

godsonnguyen101@gmail.com 

butcherspride.frozenfoods@gmail.com

LINKEDIN CORPORATON

Jason Skaggs

Skaggs Faucette

530 Lytton Avenue 

2nd Floor

Palo Alto CA 94301

jason@skaggsfaucette.com 

Please take Notice that Wayne Farms LLC, (“Wayne Farms”) by its attorneys, Ladas & 

Parry LLP has filed its Amended Complaint, as a matter of course, Rule 15 (a) Fed R Civ P.

Respectfully submitted,

Date: October 26, 2020 By:

David C. Brezina (ID3121581)

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Wayne Farms LLC

Ladas & Parry LLP

David C. Brezina

Boris Umansky

224 S Michigan Ave, #1600

Chicago, IL 60604

(312) 427-1300 

dbrezina@ladas.net

Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 24 Filed: 10/26/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:234
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing will be filed in the Northern 

District of Illinois - CM/ECF LIVE, Document Filing System, which will forward copies thereof 

to any counsel of record.

I will also serve a copy by electronic mail to:

(1) Defendant LinkedIn

Jason Skaggs

Skaggs Faucette

530 Lytton Avenue 

2nd Floor

Palo Alto CA 94301

jason@skaggsfaucette.com

(2) Defendant John Doe: 

patrickwaynefarms@consultant.com

patrickwaynefarms@outlook.com

godsonnguyen101@gmail.com

butcherspride.frozenfoods@gmail.com

Date of Signature: October 26, 2020

David C. Brezina

Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 24 Filed: 10/26/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:235
Order entered July 11 , 2013 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00857-CV 

IN RE NORTH DALLAS FORNEY INVESTORS, L.L.C., ET AL., Relators 

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 11-09384 

ORDER 

Based on the Court’s opinion of today’s date, we DENY relators’ petition for writ of 

mandamus. We ORDER that relators bear the costs of this original proceeding. 

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

 JUSTICE
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in thefollowing Registration Statements:

·       RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-123610) pertaining to theSymmetry Medical Inc. 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,

·       RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-123609) pertaining to theSymmetry Medical Inc. Amended and Restated 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, theSymmetry Medical Inc. 2003 Stock Option Plan and the Symmetry Medical Inc. 2002Stock Option Plan, and

·       RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-123607) pertaining to theSymmetry Medical Inc. 401(k) Plan;

of ourreports dated February 17, 2006, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of Symmetry Medical Inc. and Symmetry Medical Inc.management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofSymmetry Medical Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)for the year ended December 31, 2005.

|                                               |   | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
| Indianapolis, Indiana  February 17, 2006 |   |                           |

 

----