alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lou. & Cin. & Lex. Railroad Co. *v.*Wm. Wigglesworth & Co.

Railroads — Burden of Proof — Defective Spark Arrester.

The burden is upon the defendant railroad company, in an action for damages by fire, to show that a train drawn by an engine did not have defective spark arresters., where .such fact is peculiarly within its knowledge.

APPEAL PROM PAYETTE! CIRCUIT COURT.

December 9, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The evidence in this case certainly conduced to show that the fire that consumed the corn of appellee originated from sparks emitted from one of appellant’s locomotives.

*71*Johnson & Brown, for appellants.*

*Breckenridge & Buckner, for appellees.*

A locomotive with a defective spark catcher passed up to Lexington at 7 o’clock on the evening of the fife. A train returning from Lexington passed Darnell’s at 10 o’clock the same night. It was within the power of appellant to have shown whether or not that train was propelled by this defective locomotive, just as it did show that the locomotive drawing the train'passing from Louisville to Lexington on the same night was in perfect repair.

The failure upon the part of appellant to make this proof considered in connection with the other facts proven, authorized the court to give the instructions complained of, and made it his duty to overrule the motion for a new trial.

The two instructions given upon motion of appellees', qualified ' as they are by the instruction given upon appellant’s motion, correctly present the law of this case.

The remaining instructions 'asked for by appellant were properly refused. Appellees did not base their right to a recovery upon the negligence of appellant in failing to take proper care of their corn, but upon its negligence in using a defective locomotive. Hence these instructions were in no sense applicable to the issue.

Judgment *affirmed.*
Exhibit 32.2

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of MPC Corporation (the “*Company*”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “*Report*”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

|          | /s/ Michael Whyte                            |
|---------------|----------------------------------------------|
| April 6, 2007 | Michael Whyte                                |
|          | Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
## NO. 12

- 24

- 00019

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

EZELL THOMPSON, SR.

, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, APPELLEE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 114TH

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant , Ezell Thompson, Sr. filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is

signed by Appellant and his counsel. No decision has been delivered in this appeal.

Accordingly, Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed

. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 42.2 (a).

Opinion delivered August 7 , 202 4

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

( DO NOT PUBLISH )

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

AUGUST 7 , 2024

NO. 12

- 24

- 00019

- CR

EZELL THOMPSON, SR.

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

Appeal from the 114th District Court

of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 114

- 2493

- 23 )

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss

the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J
#### W. O. Crenshaw *v.*Alissa Jarvis, etc.

Equity — Useless Procedure.

A court of equity will not compel the payment of money and a commission for collecting the sum, where the money would have to be -paid back as- soon as collected, since it would be compelling a useless thing.

APPEAL FROM SCOTT CIRCUIT COURT.

January 7, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

It seems to the court under the judgment of the 18th of April, 1869, it was the duty of the master to collect so much of the purchase money of the land from appellant as would be sufficient to pay the owners of the four-sevenths thereof what they would be entitled to and the proposition of appellant’s costs, expenses and allow-*269anee therefor allowed out of the land money, and for the residue to have credited him on his sale bonds, as he was in the judgment directed to pay three shares to him. It would be useless, and might be oppressive to coerce him to pay these three shares to the commissioner, and then for him, immediately on receiving the amount, to pay it back; a vain and useless transaction, which the law will never require to be done, and which we will not interpret the judgment referred to as authorizing. With this understanding of the judgment the court below, in the case of *Crenshaw v. Cantrell, etc.,*should have ascertained the amount on the sale bond which was unpaid and that would be required to satisfy those entitled to the four-sevenths of the same, and appellant’s proportion of the costs, expenses, and allowance charges on the land fund, and to have dissolved the injunction with damages for those amounts, and for the residue of the bond, perpetuated the injunction. It is not consistent with the principles of equity to make appellant pay commissions for collecting money from him, which must be paid back to him as soon as collected.

Wherefore, the judgment dismissing appellant’s petition and dissolving his injunction in the case of *Crenshaw v. Cantrell, etc.,*as do the amount of the sale bond which last matured, is reversed and the' cause remanded for a judgment and for further proceedings consistent herewith. His pro rata of the costs, expenses, etc., should be ascertained and that amount included in the amount for which the dissolution should go.

As to the judgment in the case of *Crenshaw v. Jarvis, etc.,*although. Mrs. Jarvis had not an express authority, from the dis-tributees, or all of them, when she rented the land, still what she did was acquiesced in and ratified by their subsequent conduct, and the settlement of her accounts by the master, including the charge against her for the rents, and the judgment of the court against her for the same in favor of those entitled thereto, discharges appellant from all responsibility. His injunction was properly dissolved and his petition against Mrs. Jarvis properly dismissed, and the same is, therefore, *affirmed.*The question of damages on the dissolution of an injunction is one of discretion to some extent, at least, with the circuit judge and, - perceiving no abuse of *270that discretion in this case, the judgment is affirmed' on the cross-appeal.

*Polk, Robinson, for appellant.*

*Prewitt, for appellees.*
|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.; and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                                                                       |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                       |
|                                                                  |
| /s/ Patrick E. Miller                                                 |
| Patrick E. MillerChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel are you 

a Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this &ourt an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this &ourt’s

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 8.6.&§1746, this

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

In Re: TikTok, Inc., Consumer

Privacy Litigation

20-cv-04699

Morgan Kukovec

Kathleen Chavez

Foote, Mielke, Chavez & O'Neil, LLC

10 West State Street, Suite 200

Geneva, IL 60134

06255735 630-232-7450

kcc@fmcolaw.com

09/11/2020

✔

✔

✔

✔

Kathleen C. Chavez

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 66 Filed: 09/11/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1564
TRANSLATION PROVIDED BY MICROSOFT WORD TRANSLATOR

Department of Forensic Sciences Achieves Recognition by OSAC-NIST

The Department of Forensic Sciences of the OIJ is the first international implementer of the 

Registry standards of the Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Sciences in 

areas of toxicology, ballistics, and ISO 21043-2 (Forensic Sciences).

The Department of Forensic Sciences of the Judicial Investigation Agency (OIJ) became last 

Wednesday, August 4, the first forensic agency outside the United States to declare the 

implementation of standards in Toxicology, Firearms and Tool Marks, as well as ISO 21043-2: 

Forensic Sciences, standards that are part of the Registry of the Organization of Scientific Area 

Committees for Forensic Sciences (OSAC). 

This organization belongs to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) of the 

United States of America, an entity recognized worldwide in promoting innovation in science 

and technology. The OSAC was created in 2012, in order to solve the lack of specific standards 

for different areas of Forensic Sciences and as a result of the report "Strengthening Forensic 

Science in the United States: A Way Forward", prepared by the National Academy ofSciences, a 

document that has become a reference worldwide.

To achieve this recognition, the laboratories had to incorporate in documents of the Quality 

Management System (Quality Manual and standardized operating procedures) aspects and 

measures for compliance with them, after performing a gap analysis to determine and plan how 

to incorporate in these documents the required aspects, a process that took approximately two 

years.

The adoption of the standards of the OSAC Registry by a forensic laboratory represents the 

continuation of the commitment to improve the implementation of high quality standards, by 

incorporating specific scientific requirements that guarantee the application of best practices in 

the daily work carried out in tests or inspections.

The Department of Forensic Sciences of OIJ was accredited in various scopes in the areas of 

DNA, toxicology and drug analysis in 2017 by the accrediting body ANAB of the United States of 

America by ISO / IEC 17025. A year later, accreditation scopes were expanded in the area of 

forensic ballistics based on ISO/IEC 17020:2012. Since then, and with the collaboration of the 

International Bureau of Counternarcotics Assistance and Law Enforcement (INL) and the 

International Criminal Investigation Training and Assistance Program (ICITAP), both of the 

United States government, actions aimed at strengthening quality and improving processes have been 

implemented.

The declaration and voluntary implementation of the OSAC standards reaffirms the 

commitment of the Forensic Laboratory of Costa Rica to guarantee the Administration of 

Justice scientific evidence protected by good science, strengthening impartiality, reliability and 

credibility in the expert reports that are required, for the benefit of transparency in the 

administration of justice and the protection of human rights.
MAXXAM INC.

                  PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

          Listed below are MAXXAM Inc.'s principal subsidiaries and the
jurisdiction of their incorporation or organization.  Certain subsidiaries
are omitted which, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary,
would not constitute a significant subsidiary.


                                                                  STATE OR
                                                                  PROVINCE
                                                              OF INCORPORATION
                                                                     OR
                            NAME                                ORGANIZATION
------------------------------------------------------------ -----------------

ALUMINUM OPERATIONS
     Alpart Jamaica Inc.                                     Delaware
     Alumina Partners of Jamaica (partnership)               Delaware
     Anglesey Aluminium Limited                              United Kingdom
     Kaiser Alumina Australia Corporation                    Delaware
     Kaiser Aluminum Corporation                             Delaware
     Kaiser Aluminium International, Inc.                    Delaware
     Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation                  Delaware
     Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical of Canada Limited            Ontario
     Kaiser Bauxite Company                                  Nevada
     Kaiser Bellwood Corporation                             Delaware
     Kaiser Finance Corporation                              Delaware
     Kaiser Jamaica Bauxite Company (partnership)            Jamaica
     Kaiser Jamaica Corporation                              Delaware
     Queensland Alumina Limited                              Queensland
     Volta Aluminium Company Limited                         Ghana
FOREST PRODUCTS OPERATIONS
     Britt Lumber Co., Inc.                                  California
     MAXXAM Group Inc.                                       Delaware
     Salmon Creek LLC (limited liability company)            Delaware
     Scotia Pacific Company LLC (limited liability company)  Delaware
     The Pacific Lumber Company                              Delaware
REAL ESTATE OPERATIONS
     Horizon Corporation                                     Delaware
     MAXXAM Property Company                                 Delaware
     MCO Properties Inc.                                     Delaware
     MCO Properties L.P. (limited partnership)               Delaware
     Palmas del Mar Properties, Inc.                         Delaware
RACE PARK OPERATIONS
     New SHRP Acquisition, Inc.                              Delaware
     SHRP General Partner, Inc.                              Texas
     Sam Houston Entertainment Corp.                         Texas
     Sam Houston Race Park, Ltd. (limited partnership)       Texas
OTHER
     MAXXAM Group Holdings Inc.                              Delaware
Exhibit 13.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report of Spreadtrum Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David S. Wu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 30, 2009



|                               
|-------------------------------
|/s/ David S. Wu                
|David S. Wu                    
|Chief Financial Officer        
|Spreadtrum Communications, Inc.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 United States Code Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report.
3/28/22, 9:50 AM blob:https://www.fdms.gov/33ac2060-9d05-4e3b-8501-b6433b995eba

blob:https://www.fdms.gov/33ac2060-9d05-4e3b-8501-b6433b995eba 1/1

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 3/28/22 9:50 AM

Received: March 24, 2022

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. l15-edfx-z1z5

Comments Due: April 25, 2022

Submission Type: Web

Docket: NIST-2022-0001

Evaluating and Improving NIST Cybersecurity Resources: The Cybersecurity Framework and

Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management

Comment On: NIST-2022-0001-0001

RFI-2022-03642

Document: NIST-2022-0001-DRAFT-0016

Comment on FR Doc # N/A

Submitter Information

Name: Daniel Sela

Address:

New York,  NY,  10009

General Comment

I would like to see data governance and security guidelines for data shared or stored by vendors.

I would like to see more guidelines to form best practices around how to limit the storage of sensitive data

with external vendors.

an example using the recent Okta breach is that many companies use Okta as an authentication and

authorization provider, but it is not necessary to store sensitive customer data in Okta to get these benefi

from the service.

e.g.

- the username doesn't have to be the user's email

- upon login to a system the system could translate the user's email input to an anonymized unique

identifi

- the anonymized unique ID can then be used to verify the user's authentication and authorization with

Okta

end goal: minimize the organization's exposure to 3rd party security breaches in first pla
exv10w1



 






Exhibit 10.1




Larence Park has entered into a Change of Control Agreement with the Company that is
substantially identical in all respects to the agreement with Paul F. Walsh that was filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2002.
#### STATE v. STEELE

No. 184P97

Case below: 125 N.C.App. 746

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 May 1997.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
     REGISTRANT'S UNAUDITED BALANCE SHEET AS OF AUGUST 31, 1999 AND THE
     UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX
     MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                          0000835585
<NAME>                C-Phone Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                            1
<CURRENCY>                            USD

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  AUG-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                          3,201,014
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     438,010
<ALLOWANCES>                     (101,034)
<INVENTORY>                     1,068,927
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  107,288
<PP&E>                          1,029,517
<DEPRECIATION>                   (894,880)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  4,927,680
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             850,276
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           83,740
<OTHER-SE>                      3,993,664
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    4,927,680
<SALES>                           756,369
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   10,000
<CGS>                             677,902
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       3,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    5,268
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (1,885,944)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (1,885,944)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                   (1,885,994)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.24)


</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4087 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid,5-[[4- 

chloro-6-[[3-[[8-[4-fluoro-6- (methylphenylamino)–1,3,5-triazin-2- 

yl]amino]-1-hydroxy-3,6- disulfo-2-naphthalenyl]azo]-4- 

sulfophenyl],amino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-4-hydroxy-3-[(1-sulfo-2- 

naphthalenyl)azo]-sodium salt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 31, 2004 

Mr. BAKER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,7- 

Naphthalenedisulfonic acid,5-[[4-chloro-6-[[3-[[8-[4- 

fluoro-6- (methylphenylamino)–1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]- 

1-hydroxy-3,6- disulfo-2-naphthalenyl]azo]-4- 

sulfophenyl],amino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-4-hydroxy3-[(1-sulfo-2-naphthalenyl)azo]-sodium salt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4087 IH 

1 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 2,7- 

2 NAPHTHALENEDISULFONIC ACID,5-[[4- 

3 CHLORO-6-[[3-[[8-[4-FLUORO-6- 

4 (METHYLPHENYLAMINO)–1,3,5-TRIAZIN-2- 

5 YL]AMINO]-1-HYDROXY-3,6-DISULFO-2- 

6 NAPHTHALENYL]AZO]-4- 

7 SULFOPHENYL],AMINO]-1,3,5-TRIAZIN-2- 

8 YL]AMINO]-4-HYDROXY-3-[(1-SULFO-2- 

9 NAPHTHALENYL)AZO]-SODIUM SALT. 

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

11 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

12 amended by striking heading 9902.32.04 and inserting the 

13 following: 

‘‘ 9902.32.04 2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonic 

acid,5-[[4-chloro-6-[[3-[[8- 

[4-fluoro-6- 

(methylphenylamino)–1,3,5- 

triazin-2-yl]amino]-1-hydroxy-3,6-disulfo-2- 

naphthalenyl]azo]-4- 

sulfophenyl],amino]-1,3,5- 

triazin-2-yl]amino]-4-hydroxy-3-[(1-sulfo-2- 

naphthalenyl)azo]-sodium 

salt (CAS No. 155522–05– 

7) (provided for in subheading 3402.16.30) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2007 ’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

16 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

17 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ