alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15



May 10, 2000


Koger Equity, Inc.
8880 Freedom Crossing Trail
Jacksonville, Florida  32256




We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Koger Equity, Inc. and subsidiaries for the periods ended March
31, 2000 and 1999, as indicated in our report dated April 28, 2000; because we
did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on such financial information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-55179 of Koger
Equity, Inc. on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-54617 of Koger Equity,
Inc. on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-20975 of Koger Equity, Inc. on
Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-23429 of Koger Equity, Inc. on Form
S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-37919 of Koger Equity, Inc. on Form S-3 and
Registration Statement No. 333-33388 of Koger Equity, Inc. on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.








DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Jacksonville, Florida
##### 



Exhibit 3 CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF THE
RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
AMERICAN STANDARD COMPANIES INC. American Standard Companies Inc, a Delaware corporation (the
Corporation), does hereby certify: FIRST: The Board of Directors of the Corporation approved and
adopted the following resolution for amending the Corporations Restated
Certificate of Incorporation declaring it advisable, and recommended that
the amendment be submitted to the stockholders of the Corporation for
their consideration: RESOLVED, that the Companys Restated Certificate of Incorporation
be amended in order to increase the number of shares of authorized
Common Stock by amending clause (a) of Article FOURTH to read in its
entirety as follows: (a) The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation
shall have authority to issue is 560,000,000 shares of common
stock, par value $.01 per share (the Common Stock), and
2,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.01 per share
(the Preferred Stock). SECOND: This Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation
was approved by the stockholders of the Corporation at a meeting in
accordance with Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of Delaware. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of
Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation
to be executed by a duly authorized officer this 5th day of May, 2004. AMERICAN STANDARD COMPANIES INC.By:
    
    /s/ J. Paul McGrathName:
    
    J. Paul McGrathTitle:
    
    Senior Vice President,General Counsel and Secretary
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk January 18, 2013

t0116 

# Order

January 18, 2013

146011

- 2

HOME

- OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146011

- 2

COA: 301105, 301775

Arenac CC: 10

- 011286

- CK

VIRGIE DOWNS, Individually and as Next

Friend of Jacquelyn Downs,

Defendant

- Appellant,

and

GARY STEIN, KIMBERLY HALEY

- STEIN,

and JADE STEIN,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 10, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be r eviewed by this Court.

H ATHAWAY , J., not participating.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trane Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, G. Peter DAloia, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/S/    G. PETER DALOIA                          
|G. Peter DAloia                                 
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

May 9, 2008
10494.

#### Amos *v.*The State.

Decided June 9, 1919.

Accusation of misdemeanor (revocation of probation); from city court of Madison—Judge Anderson. .April 12, 1919.

*E. R. Lambert,*for plaintiff in error.

*A. G. Foster, solicitor,*contra.

Stephens, J.

The bill of exceptions contains no assignment of error. It therefore presents no question for this court to determine.

*Writ pf error dismissed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Patriot Scientific Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification
      is
      an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of Patriot Scientific
      Corporation does hereby certify, pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
      and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
      18
      of the United States Code 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      April 20, 2007


/s/
                Thomas J. Sweeney
              Thomas
                J. Sweeney
              *Chief
                Financial Officer*
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.
RICHEY FARMER,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 20

- 3229 (D.C. No. 2:19

- CR

- 20050

- JAR

- JPO

- 1) (D. Kan.)

_________________________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

________________________ _________ Before MATHESON , BACHARACH , and PHILLIPS , Circuit Judges. **

_________________________________ This matter is before the court upon: (1) the government’s Motion for Enforcement
of Appeal Waiver ; (2) appellant Richey Farmer’s response; and (3) the parties’
subsequent Joint Motion to Remand for Additional Trial Court Proceedings

. Upon
consideration and review of the record, the court :

A. G rants the Joint Motion to Remand , remands this case with instructions for

the United States District Court for the District of Kansas to vacate the

* Thi s order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

** Because this matter is being decided on a Joint Motion to Remand for Resentencing this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of the appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cas e is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### January 25, 2021
Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court2 judgment issued on October 30, 2020 and to undertake, in its discretion, all
necessary and appropriate proceedings required to resentence Mr. Farmer in

accord with the Joint Motion to Remand filed here ;

B. Denies the Motion for Enforcement without prejudice as moot ; and

C. Directs the Clerk to issue the mandate forthwith.

Entered for the Court Per Curiam
H. R. 4046

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 555 West

180th Street in New York, New York, as the ‘‘Sergeant Riayan A. Tejeda Post

Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

555 West 180th Street in New York, New York, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant Riayan A. Tejeda Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant

Riayan A. Tejeda Post Office’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00095-CV 

ANTHONY DWIGHT HEARD APPELLANT

V. 

KRISTI DAWN WEISNER APPELLEE

------------ 

FROM THE 442ND DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY 

TRIAL COURT NO. 2011-70112-431 

------------ 

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------ 

On March 23, 2017, and April 10, 2017, we notified appellant in 

accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c) that we would dismiss this 

appeal unless the $205 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). 

Appellant has not paid the $205 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b). 

 1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. 
2

Because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of 

appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2015,2

we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f). 

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4. 

PER CURIAM 

PANEL: KERR, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and PITTMAN, J. 

DELIVERED: April 27, 2017

 2See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil 

Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-district 

Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Aug. 28, 2015) (listing courts of appeals’ 

fees).
EXHIBIT 10.130

CASH COMPENSATION FOR

NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS OF THE REGISTRANT

 

As of February 24, 2006, non-management directors of Mechanical Technology Incorporated (the "Registrant") receive a cash retainer of $16,000 per year and are reimbursed for reasonable travel and related expenses.  The retainer is paid in four equal quarterly installments.  In addition, 1) non-management directors receive options to purchase 20,000 shares of the Company's common stock , 2) the Chairman of the Audit Committee receives  additional options to purchase 7,500 shares of the Company's common stock, 3) members of the Audit Committee each receive additional options to purchase 3,750 shares of the Company's common stock, 4) the Chairman of the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee receives additional options to purchase 5,000 shares of the Company's common stock, and 5) members of the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee each receive additional options to purchase 2,500 shares of the Company's common stock.  All options are issued to directors on the date of the Annual Meeting and are priced based on the closing price of the Company's stock on the Nasdaq National Market System on the date of grant and are immediately vested.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-4758

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KENNETH LEE GARDNER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:06- cr-00422-PJM) Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 22, 2008 Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Wyda, Federal Public Defender, Paresh S. Patel, Staff Attorney, Lisa W. Lunt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Emily N. Glatfel ter, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Kenneth Lee Gardner pled guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2000), and was sentenced as an armed career criminal to the mandatory minimum term of fifteen years imprisonment under 18 U.S.C.A. § 924(e) (West 2000 & Supp. 2007). Gardner appeals his sentence. We affirm. Gardner argues that his sentence violates the Sixth Amendment under Blakely v. Washington , 542 U.S. 296 (2004), and United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005), because the predicate convictions were neither admitted by him nor proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. As Gardner concedes, we have rejected this argument in previous decisions. SeeUnited States v. Williams , 461 F.3d 441, 452 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 127 S. Ct. 616 (2006); United States v. Cheek , 415 F.3d 349, 354 (4th Cir. 2005). We therefore affirm the sentence imposed by the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4015 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4015

          To expand the applicability of daylight saving time.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 23, 2004

 Mr. Rothman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To expand the applicability of daylight saving time.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Halloween Safety Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. DAYLIGHT SAVINGS TIME EXTENDED TO FIRST WEEK IN NOVEMBER.

    (a) In General.--Section 3(a) of the Uniform Time Act of 1966 (15 
U.S.C. 260a(a)) is amended by striking ``last Sunday of October'' and 
inserting ``first Sunday of November''.
    (b) Effect on Existing State Elections.--Any law in effect on the 
date of the enactment of this Act which is--
            (1) adopted pursuant to section 3(a)(2) of the Uniform Time 
        Act of 1966 by a State with parts thereof in more than one time 
        zone; or
            (2) adopted pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of such Act by a 
        State that lies entirely within one time zone,
shall be held and considered to remain in effect as the exercise by 
that State of the exemption permitted by such Act unless that State, by 
law, provides that such exemption shall not apply.
    (c) Adjustment of Operating Hours of Daytime Broadcasters.--(1) 
Notwithstanding any other provision of law or any regulation issued 
under law, the Federal Communications Commission shall, consistent with 
any existing treaty or other agreement, make such adjustment by general 
rules, or by interim action pending such general rules, with respect to 
hours of operation of daytime standard amplitude modulation broadcast 
stations as may be consistent with the public interest in receiving 
interference-free service.
    (2) The general rules, or interim action, undertaken under 
paragraph (1) may include variances with respect to operating power and 
other technical operating characteristics.
    (3) At any time after the adoption of general rules under paragraph 
(1), the general rules may be varied with respect to particular 
stations and areas because of the exigencies in each case.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-11364

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAY ZEPEDA SANCHEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:13-CR-147-3

Before DAVIS, JONES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ray Zepeda Sanchez

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sanchez has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 26, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-11364 Document: 00515012138 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/26/2019
No. 18-11364

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-11364 Document: 00515012138 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/26/2019
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 429 Agreed to House (ATH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 429

 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 13, 1998

Mr. Dreier submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and they are hereby, 
elected to the following standing committees of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on Education and the Workforce: Mr. Parker.
    Committee on Government Reform and Oversight: Mr. Lewis of 
Kentucky.
    Committee on International Relations: Mr. Burr of North Carolina.
    Committee on the Judiciary: Mrs. Bono.
    Committee on National Security: Mrs. Bono.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1

Rule 13a – 14(a)/15(d) – 14(a)

 

I, William Marshall, certify that:
|   | 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Cascade Energy Inc.; |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and 

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 
| Date:  June 30, 2006 |  
 

/s/ William Marshall  

 
 

William Marshall

 
 

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

  |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 23.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of Blackwater Midstream Corp. on Form S-8 (No. 333-152203), of our report dated June 28, 2011, except for Note 3, which is May 4, 2012,  relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Blackwater Midstream Corporation as of March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended March 31, 2011,and for the year ended March 31, 2010 appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended March 31, 2011.





We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.








/ s/ MALONEBAILEY, LLPHouston, TexasJune 28, 2011, except for Note 3, which is May 4, 2012
Cylinder Material Transmission

Circles: Transmission through the 

Squares: Transmission through the 

Open: Measured with PG(002) filter, 20’ collimation

Closed: Measured with PG(002), 80’ collimation