alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the quarterly report of Patriot Scientific Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is
an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company does hereby
certify, pursuant to Rule 13a–14(b) or Rule 15d–14(b) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
April 9, 2009


/s/
      Frederick C. Goerner
              Frederick
      C. Goerner
              Chief Executive
      Officer
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70206-70207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27785]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-85,479]


GDF Suez Mt. Tom Power Plant, a Subsidiary of GDF Suez Energy 
North America, Including On-Site Leased Workers From Guidant Group and 
ATEECA, Holyoke, Massachusetts; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on September 14, applicable to workers of GDF SUEZ Mt. Tom Power Plant, 
a subsidiary of GDF SUEZ Energy North America, including on-site leased 
workers from Guidant Group, Holyoke, Massachusetts. The Department's 
notice of determination was published in the

[[Page 70207]]

Federal Register on September 11, 2014 (79 FR 179).
    In response to a petition filed by the International Brotherhood of 
Electrical Workers, Local 455 on behalf of workers at GDF SUEZ Energy 
North America, Holyoke, Massachusetts, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged 
in the production of electricity.
    The state workforce office reports that on-site leased workers from 
ATEECA also worked on-site at the subject firm.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include on-site leased workers from ATEECA, Holyoke, 
Massachusetts.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-85,479 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of GDF SUEZ Mt. Tom Power Plant, a subsidiary of GDF 
SUEZ Energy North America, including on-site leased workers from 
Guidant Group and ATEECA, Holyoke, Massachusetts, who became totally 
or partially separated from employment on or after August 12, 2013, 
through September 4, 2016, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade 
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended.


    Signed in Washington, DC, this 16th day of October, 2014.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014-27785 Filed 11-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 496

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a threefifths vote to increase the minimum wage.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 25, 1998

Mr. TIAHRT submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to

require a three-fifths vote to increase the minimum wage.

1 Resolved, That clause 5 of rule XXI of the Rules of

2 the House of Representatives is amended by adding at the

3 end the following new paragraph:

4 ‘‘(e) No bill, joint resolution, amendment, or con5 ference report carrying a minimum wage increase shall be

6 considered as passed or agreed to unless so determined

7 by a vote of not less than three-fifths of the Members vot8 ing. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the term

9 ‘minimum wage increase’ means any amendment to sec-
2

HRES 496 IH

1 tion 6 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to in2 crease the minimum wage.’’.

Æ
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

I, BrianW. Bethers, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of 1-800 CONTACTS, INC.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)              All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Dated: November 10, 2003 | /s/ Brian W. Bethers    |   |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                          | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
MEP Advisory Board Meeting 

AGENDA

Friday, March 29, 2019

Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center

1300 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20004

Friday, March 29, 2019

Polaris Room, Concourse Level

8:00 a.m. – 8:05 a.m.

5 minutes

Meeting Opening/Logistics • Cheryl Gendron, NIST MEP

8:05 a.m. – 8:25 a.m.

20 minutes

Welcome and Introductions

• Opening Remarks

• Welcome from NIST 

Leadership

• Board and Audience 

Introductions

• Jeff Wilcox, Chair, MEP Advisory Board 

• Phil Singerman, NIST Innovation and 

Industry Services

• Carroll Thomas, NIST MEP

8:25 a.m. – 9:10 a.m.

45 minutes

Director’s Update including MEP 

National NetworkTM Strategic Plan 

2017-2022 Update

Board Feedback & Discussion

• Jeff Wilcox, Chair, MEP Advisory Board 

• Carroll Thomas, NIST MEP

.

9:10 a.m.- 9:55 a.m.

45 minutes

Working Group Update:

• Supply Chain Development 

Working Group

Board Feedback & Discussion

• Matt Newman, MEP Advisory Board

• Dave Stieren, NIST MEP

9:55 a.m. - 10:10 a.m.

15 minutes

Break

10:10 a.m.- 10:50 a.m.

40 minutes

Presentation: 

• Critical Needs in the Area of 

DoD’s Manufacturing 

Industrial Base

Board Feedback & Discussion

• Robert Gold, Director, Technology and 

Manufacturing Industrial Base, Office of 

the Undersecretary of Defense for 

Research and Engineering, Department 

of Defense (DoD)

10:50 a.m.- 11:20 a.m.

30 minutes

Presentation: 

• Cornerstone and the MEP 

National Network

• Carrie Hines, Executive Director, 

Foundation for Manufacturing Excellence 

(FORME) 
Friday, March 29, 2019, continued

MEP Advisory Board Meeting

Polaris Room, Concourse Level

11:20 a.m.- 11:45 a.m.

25 minutes

Working Group Update:

• Performance/Research 

Development Working Group

Board Feedback & Discussion

• Leslie Taito, MEP Advisory Board

• Ken Voytek, NIST MEP

11:45 a.m.- 12:10 p.m.

25 minutes

Working Group Update:

• Executive Committee

Working Group

Board Feedback & Discussion

• Jeff Wilcox, Chair, MEP Advisory Board

• Chery Gendron, NIST MEP

12:10 p.m.- 12:30 p.m.

20 minutes

Wrap-up/Public Comments • Jeff Wilcox, Chair, MEP Advisory Board 

• Carroll Thomas, NIST MEP

Rev. 3/27/2019

Agenda Subject to Change

MEP Advisory Board Agenda, March 2019

page 2

Meeting Open to the Public/Registration Complimentary but Required:

Anyone wishing to attend the MEP Advisory Board meeting must submit 

their name, company/organization, email address and phone number to 

Cheryl Gendron (Cheryl.Gendron@nist.gov ) no later than Wednesday, 

March 27, 2019, 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time.
Donna Dodson

Donna Dodson is the Chief Cybersecurity Advisor for the NIST 

Information Technology Laboratory and Director of the National 

Cybersecurity Center of Excellence (NCCoE). Since joining NIST in 

1987, Donna has been selected as a Fed 100 winner for innovations in 

cybersecurity, as one of the top 10 influential people in government IT in 

2011, and as one of Fed Scoop’s Top 50 D.C. Women in Tech.
* Judge King did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6174
In Re: JERMAL DANIELS, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-89-186, CA-98-259-2) Submitted: April 29, 1999 Decided: May 5, 1999 Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, * Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jermal Daniels, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Jermal Daniels filed this petition for a writ of mandamus asking this court to restore his right to file a direct appeal of his1990 conviction and sentence for possession with intent to distribute cocaine. The granting of a writ of mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used in extraordinary circumstances. See In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). A petitioner must show that he has a clear right to the relief sought, that the respondent has a clear duty to perform the act requested by petitioner, and that there is no other adequate remedy available. See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Daniels exercised his right to appeal his 1990 sentence, see United States v. Daniels , 929 F.2d 128 (4th Cir. 1991), and thus has already been afforded the relief he now seeks. Accordingly, although we grant Daniels leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
CONG| SEN| REP COUN
| 15 mM
i

SEN/| REP COUN

[CONG
15 i

i]

1STOMEICRRALT FSU

MSISEBRICTOBSEBLUFS,

BT 30; D/P 15: 1-5 (all)

JAPANESE FACSIMILE BALLOT

—Ri¥
SERRE
1998511438 XB

—-BRUSWNESRRER

ZEB: 6 LSSREA Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) t UV MMM EBMEREE TSO. (OHA ORMAREMBSNTA

2. FRICMENTUNSRAELUN / RABBLE ORMIITAECA.
ZERENTUNSRMAELN /RMEBLLORMEHVETE MOMMEBVET.

3 RMILDSELTL. SLRMALRMEOROREO (QD) ERS BVDELTFEU,

4FRLREMS VELL S. BEESRILSEXTRFS.

1998F=2R—-RRSRR

RBCRRLC KS (MBECR FS)

E ROAM B 8 7 WRU | £ ESSE il
ABLRBA AREAS
—AETLORRTAEtCA
FiRABSAS
(D) INOUYE, Daniel K. SS (A7 7B)
_ BYEGETIWNA
ee =) =AETRMLTFSL
(R) YOUNG, Crystal =|
AGRA =
—AFTUPRRTAEtA Bevicheeomass -
(0) ABERCROMBIE, Neil a | COMPTON, John Michael =
(NL) BEDWORTH, Nicholas = HARRIS, Marilyn A. =
(R) WARD, Gene aa KNUDSEN, Karen cae +
j j
| MATSUDA, Alan T. =
HABRUBAS
—JN—-FETUPRRMTAECA SAKATA, Keith A.
CAYETANO, Ben A4ESKRSA
For GOVERNOR (AT PAPREE)
(0) —AETLORETAEtA
R)
() LE
ARBA
—-AETLORRTAZEA
(R)  MIANO, Rich Jr. <P
(D) STEGMAIER, Dave cS |
i TYPE 30 =: | | i

a
im ” 25
=
=”
=”
=”
-_-
‘=
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant toSection 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002**

I,Harold C. Bevis, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Pliant Corporation;

2.      Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report;

4.      The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

(a)    Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 (b)   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.      The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)    All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)    Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: November 13, 2007 |                      |
|-------------------------|---------------------------|
|                    | /s/ Harold C.  Bevis      |
|                    | Harold C. Bevis           |
|                    | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF POLYPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Name of Subsidiary

State or jurisdiction of
Incorporation or OrganizationAlnery No. 104 Limited

Hong KongCelgard Acquisition Corporation

Cayman IslandsCelgard Korea, Inc.

South KoreaCelgard, LLC

DelawareDaramic Austria GmbH

AustriaDaramic NSG Tianjin PE Separator Co., Ltd.

ChinaDaramic (Thailand) Limited

ThailandDaramic Acquisition Corporation

DelawareDaramic Asia, Inc.

DelawareDaramic Holding, LLC

DelawareDaramic Holding S.A.S.

FranceDaramic International, Inc.

DelawareDaramic S.A.S.

FranceDaramic S.r.l.

ItalyDaramic Separadores de Baterias Ltda.

BrazilDaramic, LLC

DelawareMembrana GmbH

GermanyMicroporous Holding, LLC

DelawareMicroporous Products, LLC

DelawareMP Assets Corporation

DelawarePolypore Acquisition GmbH

GermanyPolypore B.V.

NetherlandsPolypore C.V.

NetherlandsPolypore K.K.

JapanPolypore (Shanghai) Membrane Products Co. Ltd.

ChinaDaramic Battery Separator India Private Limited

IndiaSeparatorenerzeugung GmbH

AustriaSeparatorenerzeugung Holding GmbH

Austria


---
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Cannon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Solectron Corporation on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended
February 28, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Solectron Corporation.

Date:   April 14, 2003


                                       /S/ Michael Cannon
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       Michael Cannon
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Solectron and will be retained by Solectron and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-21166

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MAXIMILIANO MOLINA-PORTILLO,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-00-CR-405-2

 

February 19, 2002

Before POLITZ, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Maximiliano Molina-Portillo appeals his conviction following a guilty plea to

aiding and abetting the possession of a counterfeit and falsely made Immigration and
1United States v. Guzman-Ocampo, 236 F.3d 233 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct.

2600 (2001).

2168 F.3d 141 (5th Cir. 1999).

3United States v. Marek, 238 F.3d 310 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 37

(2001).

2

Naturalization Service (INS) Form I-131, a violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 & 1546(a). 

He contends that the indictment was constitutionally insufficient and that the factual

basis of his plea failed to establish the charged offense.

We review Molina’s challenge to the sufficiency of the indictment, raised for

the first time on appeal, under the standard of “maximum liberality.”1 Construing

the indictment liberally as we must, see United States v. Cabrera-Teran,

2

 we hold

that the indictment’s citation to 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a) was sufficient to inform Molina

of the charge. 

Molina concedes that he did not raise the objection to the factual basis in the

district court; therefore, our review is for plain error only.3 We hold that 8 C.F.R. §

223.2(a) supports a determination under the plain-error standard of review that the

indictment’s reference to Form I-131 necessarily includes its supporting

documentation. 
4See, e.g., Moskal v. United States, 498 U.S. 103 (1990) (rejecting the same argument in

the context of 18 U.S.C. § 2314); see also United States v. Mitchell, 588 F.2d 481 (5th Cir.

1979).

3

Applying the plain-error standard of review, we also reject Molina’s

argument that the terms “falsely made” and “counterfeited” are interchangeable for

purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a).4 

For these reasons, the judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of FirstConsulting Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies,to his knowledge, that:

(i)    the accompanying QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 30, 2007 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)   the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: May 9, 2007 |   | /s/ LARRY R. FERGUSON   |   |
|--------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|               |   | Larry R. Ferguson       |
|               |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238.  This certification shall not be deemed “filed”for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,nor shall it be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company underthe Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

1

----