alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Adjustment of Salary of Douglas F. Bauer



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 ADJUSTMENT OF SALARY OF DOUGLAS F. BAUER 
  
 Effective July 1, 2005, the annual base salary of Douglas F. Bauer, Executive Vice President and Northern California
Division President of William Lyon Homes, was increased from $225,000 to $275,000.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4001

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to use the Agricultural Research 

Service to conduct research regarding the likelihood and risks of the 

transfer between animal species of the proteinaceous infectious particles, 

known as prions, that cause transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 18, 2004

Mr. LATHAM (for himself, Mr. NETHERCUTT, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. 

MCDERMOTT, and Mr. LEACH) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to use the Agricultural Research Service to conduct research regarding 

the likelihood and risks of the transfer between animal 

species of the proteinaceous infectious particles, known 

as prions, that cause transmissible spongiform 

encephalopathies, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4001 IH 

1 SECTION 1. AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE RE2 SEARCH ON INTERSPECIES TRANSFER OF 

3 PROTEINACEOUS INFECTIOUS PARTICLES 

4 CAUSING TRANSMISSIBLE SPONGIFORM 

5 ENCEPHALOPATHIES. 

6 (a) RESEARCH PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.—The Sec7 retary of Agriculture may establish a research program 

8 under which the Agricultural Research Service will con9 duct research regarding the likelihood and risks of the 

10 transfer between animal species of the proteinaceous infec11 tious particles, known as prions, that cause transmissible 

12 spongiform encephalopathies. In carrying out the research 

13 program, the Agricultural Research Service shall specifi14 cally study the risks associated with feeding livestock by15 products to other animals, such as chickens, turkeys, and 

16 hogs, which are subsequently slaughtered and the by-prod17 ucts of which are feed to livestock or whose offspring are 

18 slaughtered and the by-products of which are feed to live19 stock. 

20 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

21 authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Agri22 culture to carry out the research program $15,000,000 for 

23 fiscal year 2005, $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2006, and 

24 $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2007.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

ABC Corporation I, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.:

1:20−cv−04806

Honorable Thomas M.

Durkin

The Partnership and Unincorporated Associations

Identified on Schedule "A", et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, March 15, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Pursuant to the joint

stipulation to extend time to file pleadings [189], the answering Tomoloo Defendants will

file their amended answers, affirmative defenses, and counterclaims by 3/19/2021; and

Plaintiffs have until 4/9/2021 to respond to the Answering Tomoloo Defendants'

pleadings. Mailed notice. (ecw, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 190 Filed: 03/15/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:5618
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer of GFI Group Inc.  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of GFI Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James A. Peers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to the 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



Date:
March 2, 2009

/s/ JAMES A. PEERS James A. Peers Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
J.

AP A "A •I. NRS 176.015(5)(d) (defining "victim"). Therefore, we conclude that the district court plainly erred by awarding restitution to VOCP rather than to the actual victim. See Martinez v. State, 115 Nev. 9, 974 P.2d 133 (1999). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED IN PART AND REMANDED IN PART to the district court for the entry of an amended judgment of conviction awarding restitution to the victim and for proceedings consistent with this order.'

J. Douglas

Saitta

cc: Seventh Judicial District Court Dept. 2 State Public Defender/Ely State Public Defender/Carson City Attorney General/Carson City White Pine County District Attorney White Pine County Clerk

"After the entry of the amended judgment of conviction, VOCP maintains subrogation rights for payments made on behalf of the victim in this case pursuant to NRS 217.240.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) I947A 2
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 11 Filed: 06/29/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:43
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 11 Filed: 06/29/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:44
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

EMOJI COMPANY GmbH, )

) Case No. 20-cv-4874

Plaintiff, ) 

)

) Judge John J. Tharp, Jr.

v. )

)

THE INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, )

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, )

PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED )

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED )

ON SCHEDULE A HERETO, )

)

Defendants. )

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT No. 219

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff EMOJI COMPANY 

GmbH hereby dismisses with prejudice all causes of action in the complaint as to the Defendant identified 

below and in Schedule A. No motion is pending relative to this Defendant. Each party shall bear its own 

attorney's fees and costs.

No. Defendant 

219 Tinffy

The respective Defendant has not filed an answer to the complaint or a motion for summary 

judgment in this matter. Therefore, it is respectfully submitted that dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is 

appropriate.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: May 12, 2021 By: s/Michael A. Hierl _ 

Michael A. Hierl (Bar No. 3128021)

William B. Kalbac (Bar No. 6301771)

Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd.

Three First National Plaza

70 W. Madison Street, Suite 4000

Chicago, Illinois 60602

(312) 580-0100 Telephone

mhierl@hsplegal.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

EMOJI COMPANY GmbH
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned attorney hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of 

Voluntary Dismissal was filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court and served on all counsel of 

record and interested parties via the CM/ECF system on May 12, 2021.

s/Michael A. Hierl
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the quarterly report of Patriot Scientific Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an
exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company does hereby
certify, pursuant to Rule 13a–14(b) or Rule 15d–14(b) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
October 10, 2008


/s/
      Frederick C. GoernerFrederick
      C. Goerner
              Chief Executive
      Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                          34,116
<SECURITIES>                                    15,557
<RECEIVABLES>                                  137,202
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,045
<INVENTORY>                                     92,989
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               325,269
<PP&E>                                         131,015
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,031
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 463,303
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          149,705
<BONDS>                                         65,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       142,406
<OTHER-SE>                                     106,192
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   463,303
<SALES>                                        216,094
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               216,094
<CGS>                                           97,242
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   97,242
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               307,833
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   141
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 265
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (185,478)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (47,352)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (138,126)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (138,126)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (8.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (8.40)
        

</TABLE>
August 2001 

Global Positioning Systems Used in Rental Cars 

By: Juana Williams 

In recent years, weights and measures officials have seen an influx of different types of 

technology being used to measure time and distance. Questions continue to be raised as 

to who has jurisdictions over these measurements. Weights and measures officials 

regulating the rental car industry may be interested in recent headlines which report that 

Global Positioning Systems (GPS) are being used to monitor vehicle speed. Typically, 

the GPS uses information transmitted from satellites to determine the position of the 

vehicle. The location information is important to fleet operators when vehicles are lost, 

stolen, disabled, or overdue. Fleet operators also use the information to monitor vehicle 

inventory, frequency of use, and whether or not drivers are outside of permissible 

geographic boundaries. 

In the case of rental cars GPS, customers contracting to rent cars were charged extra fees 

for each event over a specified speed limit and the daily/weekly rental rate. Fees were 

reported as high as $150.00 each time the speed exceeded a preset limit. Fleet operators 

indicated that the practice of tracking vehicle speed was initiated in response to concerns 

about safety and insurance rates. There have been numerous debates about whether or 

not the practice of charging extra fees/fines for speeding provides due process to 

customers. Contract customers are also raising questions about privacy issues. Contract 

customers may be able to select a car model, but not select cars with or without internal 

equipment such as GPS.
Exhibit 99.1        Officer's Certificate regarding Annual Statement of
                    Compliance of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.

                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

The undersigned officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies on behalf of the Company
and on his own behalf for purposes of the WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2004-CB1, as follows:

1. I am a duly appointed and qualified First Vice President of the Company.

2. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement related to the
above-referenced series of Certificates.

3. I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate on
behalf of the Company.

4. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and performance under this Agreement has been made under my
supervision.

5. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 29, 2005.





                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.


                     By: /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                         -------------------------------------
                         Thomas G. Lehmann
                         First Vice President
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Patriot Scientific Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification
      is
      an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of Patriot Scientific
      Corporation does hereby certify, pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
      and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
      18
      of the United States Code 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      January 16, 2007


/s/
                David H. Pohl
              David
                H. Pohl
              *Chief
                Executive Officer*
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Section 1350 CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Symmetry MedicalInc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), does hereby certify that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2005 (the “Form 10-K”) of the Corporationfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Kfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Corporation.

Dated:    February 27, 2006

|        | /s/ BRIAN  MOORE        |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Brian Moore             |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

|        | /s/ FRED HITE           |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Fred Hite               |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL SHAWN ROCHESTER,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

LINDA ROWE, MD; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-17772

D.C. No. 3:08-cv-04747-RS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Richard Seeborg, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2012** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Michael Shawn Rochester appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to

prosecute. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse

FILED

MAR 07 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-17772

of discretion. Ash v. Cvetkov, 739 F.2d 493, 495 (9th Cir. 1984). We affirm.

 The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the action

without prejudice after it warned Rochester that failure to file an amended

complaint could result in dismissal, and granted an extension of time to comply

with its order. See id. at 496-97 (listing factors to consider before dismissing an

action for lack of prosecution and explaining that “[a] relatively brief period of

delay is sufficient to justify” a dismissal without prejudice for failure to prosecute).

 We do not consider Rochester’s contentions concerning the district court’s

order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss. See id. at 497-98 (interlocutory

orders are not appealable after dismissal without prejudice for failure to prosecute). 

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20-0614
IN RE THE ADOPTION OF: R.D.J.,a Minor Child, JEREMY JAMES,

Petitioner and Appellee,
v. WAYNE DARRELL DAILEY,

Respondent and Appellant. 

# FILED JUN 2 8 2021 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Suprerne Court State of Montana ORDER

This Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance with Rules 11 and 12 of the Montana Rules ofAppellate Procedure. After reviewing the Appellant's reply brieffiled on June 28,2021,this Court has determined that the briefdoes not comply with the Rule and must be resubmitted. M. R. App. P. 11(4)(a) pertains to the word count of a proportionately-spaced brief, denoted in the certificate of cornpliance, and states that "a reply brief or amicus briefshall not exceed 5,000 words." (Emphasis added.) Appellant's reply briefdenotes the briefcontains 6,023 words,which is well above the required length. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the signed original and nine copies of the referenced brief be returned for revisions necessary to comply with the specified Rule; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a signed original and nine copies ofthe revised brief ordered herein be filed within ten (10)days ofthe date ofthis Order with the Clerk ofthis Court and that one copy ofthe revised briefbe served on each counsel ofrecord; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no changes, additions, or deletions other than those specified in this Order may be made to the briefas originally filed; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the postage costs for returning the referenced 06/29/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0614

### copies ofAppellant's briefwill be billed to Appellant's counsel by the Clerk ofthis Court

and shall be due and payable upon receipt; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained in M.R.App.P. 13 shall run from the date offiling ofthe revised brief. The Clerk ofthis Court is directed to mail a true copy ofthis Order to counsel for Appellant and to mail a true copy ofthis Order to all counsel upon whom the brief was served. DATED this 

# 2.8 day ofJune,2021. For the Court,

Justice
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

WZ Franchise Corporation

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−05204

Honorable John Z. Lee

Tyson Foods Inc, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, September 4, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:A Rule 16 initial status hearing

is set for 10/21/20 at 9:00 a.m. The parties are directed to file a joint initial status report by

10/14/20. The report should comply with the requirements for initial joint status reports

set forth in the Initial Status Conference standing order, which can be found on the Court's

website. In light of the COVID−19 pandemic and the related General Orders, the Court

finds that it is necessary to conduct the status hearing via telephone conference. The

call−in number is 888−273−3658 and the access code is 1637578. Counsel of record will

receive a separate email at least 12 hours prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with

instructions on how to join the call. All persons granted remote access to proceedings are

reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting

of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in court−imposed

sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future

hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by

the Court. All participants should review the Court's standing order regarding telephone

conferences that is on Judge Lee's website, which can be found at:

https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge−info.aspx?4Qf5 zc8loCI5U7rfMP9DHw== Mailed

notice(ca, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-05204 Document #: 6 Filed: 09/04/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:160
#### STRATFORD METAL FINISHING v. OLD SALEM, INC.

No. 296P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 436

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 23 July 1997.
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Energy Visions Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, D. Wayne Hartford, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ D. Wayne Hartford



By: D. Wayne Hartford



Chief Executive Officer



May 20, 2003