alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
Exhibit 32.1Certification of Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of MAXXAM Inc., a Delaware corporation (the ACompany@), does hereby certify that:(a)           the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 of the Company (the AReport@) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated:   April 28, 2008                                                 	    		    		    		    		                   /S/   CHARLES E. HURWITZ             		    		    		    		    	      Charles E. Hurwitz    		    		    		    		    	      Chief Executive OfficerThe foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).
```
#### W. O. Crenshaw *v.*W. B. Keen's Adm'r.

Parties — Partners.

One who alleges that he is a partner of a defendant, and exhibits the articles of partnership, shows sufficient interest in the result of the litigation, as to entitle him to'he made a party to the action.

APPEAL FROM SCOTT CIRCUIT COURT.

January 17, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

In the amended petition filed by Keen’s administrator against Ashurst and Brother it is alleged that the mortgage includes all the improvements, buildings, etc., upon the factory lot and all the machinery and apparatus thereon the 7th of February, 1871.

The judgment foreclosing the mortgages is to sell the whole of this property, or so much as will pay the debts.

Crenshaw alleges that he became a partner in the’ firm of Adent & Bro. in the year 1867 and paid into the partnership to be invested in the enterprise ten thousand dollars or upwards. The money was used as alleged for the purposes of the partnership and a large portion of the machinery now sought to be sold by the judgment of the appellees, was purchased and placed in the mill whilst he was a partner; that the greater portoin of his money is still due him. He exhibits the articles of partnership, and we thinV manifests such an interest in the result of the litigation as to require the court to make him a party so that he can assert his claim in the present equitable action, by the creditors of the other partners to subject it to the payment of their debts. The only cause of complaint Crenshaw has is in the refusal of the court to make him a party. The remaining errors assigned, if they exist, are not complained of by the parties affected by them. It being error, *344however, to refuse the appellant the right to be heard in the present action.

*Polk, for appellant.*

*Robinson, for appellee.*

The judgment must be reversed and cause remanded so as to permit him to be made a party to the action and for further proceedings' consistent herewith.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 26, 2012

h0319 

# Order

March 26, 2012

143858

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143858 COA: 301387 Wayne CC: 95-002711-FC JOHNNY RILEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 30, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
No. 87-6537.

#### Gains *v.*Scully, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility.

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          30,076
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  215,906
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (8,631)
<INVENTORY>                                     13,436
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               284,738
<PP&E>                                         888,106
<DEPRECIATION>                               (314,448)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,418,499
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          143,579
<BONDS>                                      1,510,685
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       117,197
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,165,464
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,418,499
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               564,519
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  386,552
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                59,802
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,387
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,321
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 85,447
<INCOME-TAX>                                    41,507
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,940
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    43,940
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.81
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. CALL

No. 341A96

Case below: Ashe County Superior Court

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Ashe County denied 23 July 1997.
Exhibit 10.22

THIRD MODIFICATION AGREEMENT  Secured Loan

THIS THIRD MODIFICATION AGREEMENT ("Agreement") dated as of February 23, 2011, is entered into by and among MAUI LAND &
PINEAPPLE COMPANY, INC., a corporation formed under the laws of the State of Hawaii ("Borrower"), WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as sole
Lender signatory to the Loan Agreement (as defined below) ("Lender"), and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ("Wells
Fargo") as Administrative Agent under the Loan Agreement (in such capacity, the "Administrative Agent").

R E C I T A L S

NOW,
THEREFORE, Borrower, Administrative Agent and Lenders agree as follows:

---







---





---





Release Parcel [identified by TMK(s)]

Release PriceMerriman's [(2) 4-2-6-11 & (2) 4-2-4-25]

$
2,280,000.00Central Resort [(2) 4-2-4-49]

$
8,865,000.00Kapalua Mauka [(2) 4-2-1-42, (2) 4-3-1-6 & (2) 4-3-1-8]

$
24,500,000.00Village Center/Golf Academy [(2) 4-2-4-36]

$
2,695,000.00Honolua Village [(2) 4-2-4-35]

$
2,900,000.00Honolua Store [(2) 4-2-4-54]

$
1,900,000.00






---







---



---



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower, Administrative Agent and Lenders have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date first above written.

"ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND LENDER"WELLS FARGO BANK,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONBy:

/s/ JEFF JOHNSONName:Title:


---



"BORROWER"MAUI LAND & PINEAPPLE COMPANY, INC., a
Hawaii corporationBy:

/s/ TIM T. ESAKIName:

Tim T. EsakiTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerBy:

/s/ ADELE H. SUMIDAName:

Adele H. SumidaTitle:

Controller & Secretary


---





LEASEHOLD MORTGAGOR'S CONSENT

The undersigned ("Leasehold Mortgagor") consents to the foregoing Third Modification Agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby and reaffirms its obligations under the Fee and Leasehold Mortgage with Absolute Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing ("Mortgage") dated as of
November 13, 2007, as amended from time to time, and its waivers, as set forth in the Mortgage, of each and every one of the possible defenses to such obligations. Leasehold Mortgagor further
reaffirms that its obligations under the Mortgage are separate and distinct from Borrower's obligations.

Dated
as of: February 23, 2011

"LEASEHOLD MORTGAGOR"KAPALUA LAND COMPANY, LTD.,
a Hawaii corporationBy:

/s/ TIM T. ESAKIName:

Tim T. EsakiTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerBy:

/s/ ADELE H. SUMIDAName:

Adele H. SumidaTitle:

Controller & Secretary


---



QuickLinks
1 The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, Chief J udge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-1667

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Carlos Price, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 1, 2009 Filed: April 6, 2009

___________ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Carlos Price appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a firear m by a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e). Counsel has m oved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which challenges the district court’s imposition of 3 criminal history points under U.S.S.G. §§ 4A1.1(d) and 4A1.1(e), and argues that the court abused its discreti on in sentencing Price to180 months in prison.-2- We conclude that the district court’s application of sections 4A1.1(d) and 4A1.1(e) is unreviewable, given that Pri ce would have received a 15-year statutorily mandated sentence whether or not thos e provisions were applied. See 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1) (setting forth 15-year mandatory minimum prison term); United States v. Williams , 74 F.3d 872, 872 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (application of Guidelines provision not reviewable where defendant faced same sentence whether or not provision was applied).

We further conclude that the districtcourt did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Price to 180 months in prison, because the court lacked discretion to impose a lower sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1) (setting forth 15-year mandatory minimum prison term); United States v. Phelps , 536 F.3d 862, 869 (8th Cir. 2008) (substantive reasonableness of sentence is reviewed for abuse of discretion), cert. denied , 2009 WL 177236 (U.S. Feb. 23, 2009) ; United States v. Gregg , 451 F.3d 930, 937 (8th Cir. 2006) (district court was w ithout discretion to impose sentence for firearm conviction below statutory minimum).
Having reviewed the record in accordance with Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

______________________________
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each ofthe undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.      The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.      Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:               | /s/ GEOFFREY S.M.  HEDRICK |   |   |
|-------------------|----------------------------|--------|--------|
|              |                       |   |   |
|              | GEOFFREY S.M. HEDRICK      |   |   |
|              | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER    |   |   |
|              |                       |   |   |
|              |                       |   |   |
|              | /s/ JOHN C. LONG           |   |   |
|              |                       |   |   |
|              | JOHN C. LONG               |   |   |
|              | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER    |   |   |
|              |                       |   |
|              |                       |   |
| May 11, 2009 |                       |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
HAVANA REPUBLIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FORM 10-QSB FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31,2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>




<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          283,669
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    14,471
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                     707,261
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              1,305,401
<PP&E>                                          750,375
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (223,010)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                2,331,242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           287,432
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                     523,906
<COMMON>                                      4,412,459
<OTHER-SE>                                   (3,168,201)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  2,331,242
<SALES>                                         970,374
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                970,374
<CGS>                                           511,934
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   511,934
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                958,321
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (499,881)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (302,843)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (789,846)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (789,846)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (789,486)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.03)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                             CENTEX EXHIBIT 23.1


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of Centex Corporation, 3333
Holding Corporation ("Holding") and Centex Development Company, L.P. ("CDC")
registering the issuance and sale of up to 1,000,000 shares of the common stock
of Centex Corporation (and corresponding beneficial interests in the 1,000
outstanding shares of Holding common stock and the 900 outstanding warrants to
purchase Class B Units of limited partnership interest in CDC, as described in
the Registration Statement on Form S-8) pursuant to the Centex Corporation 1998
Stock Option Plan of our reports which are incorporated by reference in the
Joint Annual Report on Form 10-K of Centex Corporation, Holding and CDC for
their fiscal years ended March 31, 1997 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.


                                                   ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Dallas, Texas,
May 29, 1998
SCWC-17-0000815

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

______________________________________________________________________________

BIG ISLAND FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

WILFRED E. AGUIAR, JR., Respondent/Defendant-Appellee, and 

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY, Respondent/Garnishee-Appellee. 

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-17-0000815; CIV. NO. 3RC16-1-0329)

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

It is hereby ordered that the application for certiorari is 

dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, January 3, 2023.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-17-0000815

03-JAN-2023

10:52 AM

Dkt. 5 ODSAC
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Standard Companies
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, G. Peter DAloia, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report. /s/ G. Peter DAloia  
 July 29, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 69563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27650]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

United States Mint


Pricing for the 2014 Coin and Chronicles Set--Franklin D. 
Roosevelt

AGENCY: United States Mint, Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Mint is announcing a price of $57.95 for the 
2014 Coin and Chronicles Set--Franklin D. Roosevelt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marc Landry, Acting Associate Director 
for Sales and Marketing; United States Mint; 801 Ninth Street NW., 
Washington, DC 20220; or call 202-354-7500.

    Authority: 31 U.S.C. 5112.

    Dated: November 14, 2014.
Richard A. Peterson,
Deputy Director, United States Mint.
[FR Doc. 2014-27650 Filed 11-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
10036.

#### BURTON *et al. v.*JERNIGAN.

Decided April 16, 1919.

The contract in question is unilateral and the court did not err in dismissing the action.

Action on contract; from city court of Leesburg—Judge J. R. Long. July 5,1918.

*Robert R. Forrester, James T. Mann,*for plaintiffs.

*566
      *Yeomans & Wilkinson, W. G. Martin,*for defendant.

Jenkins, J.

An action for damages was brought by George T. Burton and C. E. Eagan against E. E. Jernigan for an alleged breach of the following contract:

> “In consideration [of the] stipulations herein named and of $5.00 paid to E. E. Jernigan of Smithville, Ga., as a bonus by Geo. T. Burton and C. E. Eagan of Dawson, Ga., the first party of the contract promises to deliver unto the second parties of this contract 2000,00 [ ?] bushels of sound dry white Spanish peanuts not later than October 15th, 1917, at a contract price of eighty cents per bushel and thirty pounds to the bushel, also scale weight to govern at Smithville, Ga. And at the time of the delivery, should these peanuts be selling at forty cents or as high as $2.00 per bushel, the first party of this contract promises to deliver at eighty cents per bushel as the contract calls for.

> “Signed, sealed, and delivered in the presence of witnesses. This the 25th day of January, 1917.

> Witness B. .E. Jones, First Party. E. E. Jernigan.

> N. P. Lee Co. Ga. Second Parties. Geo. T. Burton.

> Second Parties. C. E. Eagan.”

It is alleged in the petition that by reason of Jernigan’s failure and refusal to deliver the amount of peanuts called for by the contract, the plaintiffs were damaged in the sum of $2,000.

1. The action being in one count for damages arising from the breach of a contract of sale already effected, the court did not err in sustaining a general demurrer thereto. The alleged contract as thus taken and sued upon is plainly unilateral, and therefore unenforceable, since under it the plaintiffs, as the alleged purchasers, did not assume any obligation on their part to accept or to pay for -the goods which they contend the defendant seller had bound himself to deliver. *Morrow*v. *Southern Express Co.,*101 *Ga.*810 (28 S. E. 998); *Simpson*v. *Sanders,*130 *Ga.*265 (60 S. E..541); *Martin*v. *Cox,*13 *Ga. App.*236 (79 S. E. 39); *Haynes Auto Co.*v. *Turner,*18 *Ga. App.*22 (88 S. E. 717).

2. What the rule would be had the plaintiffs declared upon the contract as one of option, or added a separate and distinct count to that effect, is not before this court for determination. *Hillside Cotton Mills*v. *Ellis,*23*Ga. App. 45*(4) (97 S. E. 459).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Wayne Farms LLC

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−05191

Honorable Gary Feinerman

John Doe, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, December 1, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Because Doe Defendant has

until 12/3/2020 to file a responsive pleading, the status hearing set for 12/4/2020 [22] is

stricken and re−set for 12/17/2020 at 9:00 a.m. By 12/10/2020, Plaintiff shall file a status

report indicating how it intends to prosecute this case. Attorneys/Parties should appear for

the hearing by calling the Toll−Free Number: (877) 336−1828, Access Code: 4082461.

Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing (use toll

free number). Please, please be sure to keep your phone on mute when you are not

speaking. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general

prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings.

Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued

media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or

any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice.(jlj, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-05191 Document #: 30 Filed: 12/01/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:291