alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DEMONSTRATION BALLOT CARD

VOTE SPECIAL (PINK) NONPARTISAN OFFICES ON BACK OF BALLOT CARD

100 STATE OF HAWAII WMO) ciryacountyorHonotutu js SEPTEMBER 19, 1998 | ae
NATURAL LAW PARTY BALLOT DEMOGRATIC PARTY BALLOT NONPARTISAN BALLOT
U.S. SENATOR U.S. SENATOR GOVERNOR
Vote For Not More Than One (1) Vote For Not More Than One (1) Vote For Not More Than One (1)
(NL) Candidate 1 (D) Candidate 1 = (N) Candidate 1 =
(N) Candidate 2 ‘
GOVERNOR U.S. REPRESENTATIVE ; ——
Vote For Not More Than One (1) Vote For Not More Than One (1) (N) Candidate 3 —
(NL) Candidate 1 (D) Candidate 1 - (N) Candidate 4 =
(NL) Candidate 2 _~ | (D) Candidate 2 — > | (N) Candidate 5 gas
(NL) Candidate 3 -
- GOVERNOR LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR
(NL) Candidate 4 Vote For Not More Than One (1) Vote For Not More Than One (1)
(D) Candidate — > | (N) Candidate 1 Co
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR
Vote For Not More Than One (1)
(NL) Candidate 1 -: END OF iene
(NL) Candidate 2 z NONPARTISAN
BALLOT
0
END OF NATURAL
LAW PARTY
BALLOT
ee
ae
oes
LIBERTARIAN PARTY BALLOT se
U.S. SENATOR
Vote For Not More Than One (1)
(L) Candidate 1 —=
U.S. REPRESENTATIVE
Vote For Not More Than One (1) (D) Candidate 1
(L) Candidate 1 > | (D) Candidate 2
GOVERNOR
Vote For Not More Than One (1) END OF
(L) Candidate 1 DEMOCRATIC PARTY gz
BALLOT
END OF
LIBERTARIAN
PARTY BALLOT
BS
{iu | & Hey = ay a

ee ee me ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee re ee re ee re ee ee ee ee ee a ne ee ee ete ene es eee eee ese

* feat
a
* Es
*
*
‘
‘=
Eval IL Pack Components and Structure

Directory Structure

Notes: 

1. "LANG" is a variable to be replaced by the 3-letter iso code for the incident language. 

2. Each “set” directory will be encrypted, with decryption keys provided as specified in the 

evaluation plan.

3. Only monolingual_text/ directory will be under data/ in setE delivered to performers. NIST will 

also receive annotation/ and translation/ subdirectories 

README.txt

set0/

 README.txt

 data/ 

 monolingual_text/ 

 translation/

 found/

 eng/

 ltf/ 

 psm/ 

 sentence_alignment/ 

 LANG/ 

 ltf/ 

 psm/ 

 docs/ 

 categoryII/ 

 categoryI_dictionary/ 

 dtds/ 

 tools/

 encoding/

 ltf2txt/

 twitter-processing/

set1/

 README.txt

 data/

 monolingual_text/ 

 docs/ 

set2/

 README.txt 

 data/

 monolingual_text/ 

 docs/ 

setS/

 README.txt 

 data/

 monolingual_text/ 

 docs/ 
setE/

 README.txt

 data/

 monolingual_text/

 annotation/

 entity/ 

 situation_frame/ 

 translation/

 eng/

 ltf/ 

 psm/ 

 LANG/

 ltf/ 

 psm/

 docs/

Data Volumes

Set0 (all monolingual and parallel text from pre-incident epoch):

Monolingual text – 225Kw (45% NW, 33% DF/WL, 22% SN)

Parallel text – 300Kw (33% each NW, DF/WL, SN; can substitute 300Kw comparable for 100Kw parallel)

Parallel dictionary – 10K lemmas 

Other resources ("Category II") – 5 of 8 resource types: parallel IL - > non-English dictionary, monolingual 

IL dictionary, monolingual IL grammar book, parallel IL - > English grammar book, monolingual IL primer, 

monolingual IL gazetteer, parallel IL - > English gazetteer, English gazetteer for incident region

Note: Minimum target to be exceeded by 500% target for one of monolingual text, parallel text, or 

parallel dictionary

Set1 (incident date and later):

Monolingual text – 1/3 of leftover after set E is met

Set2 (incident date and later):

Monolingual text – 2/3 of leftover after set E is met

SetS (incident date and later):

English text, some incident-relevant – approximately 50Kw, genre balance will vary based on availability

SetE (incident date and later):

Monolingual text – 200Kw (approximately 50% NW, at least 25% DF/WL, up to 25% SN)

Reference translations and annotations for Simple Named Entity and Situation Frames will be provided 

to NIST for (subsets of) this data.

Documentation

The following items should be included in all eval IL docs/ directories:

• categoryI_dictionary/ – directory containing (pointer to) dictionary SET 0 ONLY

• categoryII/ – directory containing (pointers to) all category II resources SET 0 ONLY

Items in red will be sent only to NIST 

for evaluation languages. 
• source_codes.txt – 4 columns: genre, source code, source name, (base) url ALL SETS

• twitter_info.tab – 4 columns: file name, "network_id" (Tweet ID), md5sum, author_id 

ALL SETS

• urls.tab – list of all source docs with document urls ALL SETS
#### STATE v. FLETCHER

No. 124P97

Case below: 125 N.C.App. 505

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 June 1997.
#### Julia Mitchell v. Jacob Mitchell.

[Memorandum.]

Error to Kalamazoo.

Submitted October 21, 1881.

Decided June 28, 1882.

Oase, brought by plaintiff as wife of' Adalbert Mitchell',, against Jacob Mitchell, the father of Adelbert, for persuading the latter to desert and continue absent from- plaintiff for a long time and to neglect to support her. The declaration charged defendant with contriving to alienate and destroy the husband’s affection for the wife. It appeared that the husband was a minor when he was married to plaintiff. Under the charge of the court below the jury returned a verdict of no cause of action, on which judgment was rendered. Plaintiff brings error..

Affirmed by equal-division.

*O. W.*Powers, for appellant,

cited *Clark v. Harlan,*1 Cinn. Sup. Ct. 418 ; *Westlake v. Westlake*31 Ohio St. 621 ; Cooley on Torts 227; *Lynch v. Knight*9 H. of L. Cas. 577 *Winsmore v. Greenbank*Willes 577.

*Brown, Howard <& Boos,*for appellee^

against the right of action cited 2 Sharswood’s Bl. Com. 112, *113; Van Arnam v. Ayers*67 Barb. 544; if a father does- not cease to be responsible for the support of his son during the latter’s-minority, he has a right to his services and society: *Payne*
      *69
      *v. Williams*4 Baxter (Tenn.) 583; *Hills v. Hobert*2 Root 48.

Per Curiam.

In this case the Court is equally divided and the judgment is therefore affirmed.
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 1 1

- 00 401

- CR

IN RE Sigifredo DAVILA
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 22, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On June 8, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining of the trial

court’s failure to rule on his various pro se motions. However, counsel has been appointed to
represent relator in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court for which he is currently
confined. A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Robinson v. State
, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v. State , 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1995). A trial court has no lega l duty to rule on pro se motions or petitions filed with
regard to a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is represented by counsel. See Robinson
, 240 S.W.3d at 922. Consequently, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to rule

1 This pr oceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009

- CR

- 6623 , styled State of Texas v. Sigifredo Davila , pending in the 227 th Judicial District Court
, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Philip Kazen presiding.04

- 11

- 00390

- CR

- 2

- on relator’s pro se motions filed in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court.
Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8( a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RICHEY FARMER, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 20-3229

(D.C. No. 2:19-CR-20050-JAR-JPO-1)

(D. Kan.)

_________________________________

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

_________________________________

Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.**

_________________________________

This matter is before the court upon: (1) the government’s Motion for Enforcement 

of Appeal Waiver; (2) appellant Richey Farmer’s response; and (3) the parties’ 

subsequent Joint Motion to Remand for Additional Trial Court Proceedings. Upon

consideration and review of the record, the court:

A. Grants the Joint Motion to Remand, remands this case with instructions for 

the United States District Court for the District of Kansas to vacate the 

* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of 

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its 

persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. ** Because this matter is being decided on a Joint Motion to Remand for 

Resentencing this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not 

materially assist in the determination of the appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th 

Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 25, 2021

Christopher M. Wolpert

Clerk of Court
2

judgment issued on October 30, 2020 and to undertake, in its discretion, all 

necessary and appropriate proceedings required to resentence Mr. Farmer in 

accord with the Joint Motion to Remand filed here;

B. Denies the Motion for Enforcement without prejudice as moot; and

C. Directs the Clerk to issue the mandate forthwith. 

Entered for the Court

Per Curiam
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.01

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with this quarterly report of ML Futures Investments L.P. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), I, Fabio
P. Savoldelli, Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer-Alternative
Strategies and Quantitative Advisers Divisions of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1. This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 16, 2005
------------------

By /s/ FABIO P. SAVOLDELLI
   -----------------------
Fabio P. Savoldelli
Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer
- Alternative Strategies Advisers Division
(Principal Executive Officer)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 30, 2016

No. 04-16-00768-CV

Jana Lee FLANAGAN and Lucas Matthew Flanagan,

Appellants

v.

RBD SAN ANTONIO L.P., Davidson Hotel Company, LLC 

and G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc.,

Appellees

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-18601

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On December 28, 2016, the trial court clerk notified this Court that the clerk’s record was 

not filed because appellants have failed to pay, or make arrangements to pay, the clerk’s fee for 

preparing the record. Appellants are not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. 

It is therefore ORDERED that appellants provide written proof to this court within ten 

(10) days of the date of this order that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements 

have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellants are entitled to appeal without paying the 

clerk=s fee. If appellants fail to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed 

for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of December, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRIC T 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE O F 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 20 22 -2771 LT Case No. 2022- DR -001815-A

_____________________________ J USTIN S HARPE , Appellant,

v. A NGELA R EED , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County

. Joan Anthony , Judge

. Clyde M. Taylor, III , of Taylor & Taylor, P.A. , St. Augustine , for Appellant

. Robert J. Slama , of Robert J. Slama , P.A. , Jacksonville , for Appellee.

April 23 , 2024

P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED

.

M AKAR , J AY , and K ILBANE , JJ., concur
.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
First Amendment to Restated Employment Agreement



 






Exhibit 10.5




EXECUTION COPY




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 2005 AMENDED AND RESTATED

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




          First Amendment, dated as of September 28, 2005 (this “Amendment”), to the 2005 Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Properties Inc., a
Florida corporation (the “Company”), and Jonathan Fels (the “Employee”).




W I T N E S S E T H:




          WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee entered into the 2005 Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of April 15, 2005; and




          WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee desire to amend the Agreement to correct an inaccurate
cross reference.




          NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual covenants and obligations
hereinafter set forth, the Company and the Employee, intended to be legally bound, hereby agree as
follows:




          1. Section 6(e) of the Agreement is amended by deleting the words “Sections 6(c)(i) and
6(c)(ii)” in clause (i) of the third sentence of Section 6(e) and replacing them with “Sections
6(d)(i) and 6(d)(ii)”.




          2. Except as expressly set forth herein, the Agreement remains unmodified and in full force
and effect.




          3. This Amendment shall be subject to, and governed by, the laws of the State of Florida
applicable to contracts made and to be performed in the State of Florida, regardless of where the
Employee is in fact required to work.




          4. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed
to be an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.




          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of the date first
above written.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	AVATAR PROPERTIES INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	 	   /s/ Gerald D. Kelfer	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Name:
	 	Gerald D. Kelfer	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Title:
	 	Chairman of the Board	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	  /s/ Jonathan Fels	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	  Jonathan Fels
EXHIBIT 33

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 328-33 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:7650
Document title: Amazon.com: Gyroor Hoverboard Offroad All Terrain Flash Wheel Self Balancing G5 Hoverboards with Bluetooth Speaker, UL 2272 Certified Best Gift fo...

Capture URL: https://www.amazon.com/Gyroor-Hoverboard-Balancing-Hoverboards-Bluetooth/dp/B08NSHNKTN/ref=sr_1_2?...

Capture timestamp (UTC): Thu, 27 May 2021 13:01:45 GMT Page 1 of 5

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 328-33 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:7651
Document title: Amazon.com: Gyroor Hoverboard Offroad All Terrain Flash Wheel Self Balancing G5 Hoverboards with Bluetooth Speaker, UL 2272 Certified Best Gift fo...

Capture URL: https://www.amazon.com/Gyroor-Hoverboard-Balancing-Hoverboards-Bluetooth/dp/B08NSHNKTN/ref=sr_1_2?...

Capture timestamp (UTC): Thu, 27 May 2021 13:01:45 GMT Page 2 of 5

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 328-33 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:7652
Document title: Amazon.com: Gyroor Hoverboard Offroad All Terrain Flash Wheel Self Balancing G5 Hoverboards with Bluetooth Speaker, UL 2272 Certified Best Gift fo...

Capture URL: https://www.amazon.com/Gyroor-Hoverboard-Balancing-Hoverboards-Bluetooth/dp/B08NSHNKTN/ref=sr_1_2?...

Capture timestamp (UTC): Thu, 27 May 2021 13:01:45 GMT Page 3 of 5

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 328-33 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:7653
Document title: Amazon.com: Gyroor Hoverboard Offroad All Terrain Flash Wheel Self Balancing G5 Hoverboards with Bluetooth Speaker, UL 2272 Certified Best Gift fo...

Capture URL: https://www.amazon.com/Gyroor-Hoverboard-Balancing-Hoverboards-Bluetooth/dp/B08NSHNKTN/ref=sr_1_2?...

Capture timestamp (UTC): Thu, 27 May 2021 13:01:45 GMT Page 4 of 5

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 328-33 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:7654
Document title: Amazon.com: Gyroor Hoverboard Offroad All Terrain Flash Wheel Self Balancing G5 Hoverboards with Bluetooth Speaker, UL 2272 Certified Best Gift fo...

Capture URL: https://www.amazon.com/Gyroor-Hoverboard-Balancing-Hoverboards-Bluetooth/dp/B08NSHNKTN/ref=sr_1_2?...

Capture timestamp (UTC): Thu, 27 May 2021 13:01:45 GMT Page 5 of 5

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 328-33 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:7655
STATE Ti HAWAII
PRIMERO ELEKSION TI 1998

ie Septiembre 19, 1998

er || 3
! 15 | 3

Septiembre 19, 1998
PANANGISURO ITI PINAGBUTOS ITI PRIMERO ELEKSYON

ILOKANO FACSIMILE BALLOT
BT 030: 15: 1-5 (all)

Adda maaramid nga “Single Party” nga primero nga eleksyon ditoy Hawall. Dagiti agbutos ket butosan da iti para kandidato ti maysa

nga partido, wenno Nonpartisan ken iti para kandidato Iti pink seksyon ti Special “Nonpartisans Offices” nga balota.
1. Kitaen yo ti dua nga bangir iti balota ken amin ng@ agsalisal sakbay nga agbutos kayo.

2. NO AGBUTOS KAYO, markaan yo iti nangisit iti kasla Itlog (@TM>) nga porma iti kannawan ti nagan iti kandidato nga kayat yo nga

butosan.
3. BUTOSAN YO:

a. Maysa laeng nga partido wenno nonpartisan nga balota: Natural Law (yellow), Libertarian (green), Democratic (blue), Nonpartisan

(gray), Republican (orange), or Hawaiian Green (purple); and
b. Ti Espesyal “Nonpartisan Offices” nga balota (pink seksyon iti balota).
4. No masapul yo iti tulong, agdamag kayo kadigiti presento opesyal.

PRIMERO ELEKSION TI 1998

BALOTA TI PARTIDO NATURAL LAW || BALOTA Ti PARTIDO DEMOKRA RATIO | a
nee —
REPRESENTANTE TI U.S. SENADOR TI U.S.
Maysa Laeng ti Limitad ti butosan yo (1) Maysa Laeng ti Limitad ti butosan yo (1) mel
(NL) BEDWORTH, Nicholas <> | (0) INOUYE, Danie! K. => | | z=
(D) THOMPSON, Richard SS ey
WREPRESENTANTE TLUS. | =
MURDONG TIPARTIDO |_“)APERCROMBIE,Ne | > | =
NATURAL LAW NGA BALOTA| (0) cANOPIN, Al Jr, CS a
Sree |
(D) KAAN, Alexandra ) iD
GOBERNADOR > mE
Maysa Laeng ti Limitad ti butosan yo (1)
(D) BREWER, Jim SS =
(D) CAYETANO, Ben To =
(0) HO,Richardc.s. | <> = a
(D) ONAGA, Raymond N. _) | =
(D) SHIRATORI, Miles F. ey. an 4
(D) TAMURA, Fred K. <a oe]
.. BISE GOBERNADOR rel
Maysa Laeng ti Limitad ti butosan yo (1)
{D) COOK, Nancy L.
(0) ney = eo
(D) HIRONO, Mazie <> an] r Be
ae ae, nm
\ |
L | ie |
= a’
BALOTA Ti PARTIDO LIBERTARYAN =
Mays teem t ined TbusSnyo my |  REPRESENTANTE TI STATE =
(L) MALLAN, Lloyd (Jeff) <> | (0) STEGMAIER, Dave > | rd
=
Ls =
Mayes Lio ter ean yo _| a3
(L) PEABODY, George G. (Aloha)| <> MURDONG TI PARTIDO =
— n DEMOKRATIKO NGA BALOTA
Maysa Laeng ti Limitad ti butosan yo (1) _|
(L) BARTLEY, Larry &> =’
ii]
=
ii
v4
MURDONG TI PARTIDO =
LIBERTARYAN NGA BALOTA
aad
= 6 mE =

ESPESYAL NGA BUTOS (DEROSAS) NONPARTISAN OFFICES KET ADNATIILIKIID RAIN

TA
#### Robert W. Ogden *v.*Ainsley Cochran & Co.

Bills and Not,es — Bill of Exchange — What Amounts to.

A copy of an order of the county court -making an allowance of a certain sum, made by the clerk of tihe court, is not a bill -of exchange or negotiable paper, but is a mere direction to the sheriff to pay a certain sum out of a particular fund when collected.

*363APPEAL FROM WARREN CIRCUIT COURT.

January 20, 1873.

*Rodes & Clatrk, for appellant.*

*Thos. H. Hines, for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

The copy of the order of the County Court of Warren making the allowance to Rowe of $1,800 made out by the clerk of the court was in no sense a bill of exchange nor negotiable paper; but a mere direction to the sheriff of said county, who was the collector, to pay to Rowe the amount named out of a particular fund when collected, set apart or dedicated for a specified object.

The copy was not signed by the party controlling the fund, nor accepted by the sheriff, who was directed to pay the sam'e by the order of court. The time of payment was not fixed, but left uncertain ; nor does the court direct the money to be paid to the order of Rowe, or to bearer. As the writing, therefore, had none of the characteristics of negotiable paper, the law regulating the transfer and circulation of such instruments had no application to the paper in question.

We do not perceive upon what principles the evidence of Metzer & Rowe was incompetent, or how they were disqualified as witnesses. Metzer could have no possible interest, and if Rowe ever had any, the release by appellees rendered him competent.

For the reasons before stated the second instruction asked by appellant should not have been given. As no error prejudicial to appellant has been manifested, the judgment must be *affirmed.*
Affiliate Members

October 2023

AFFILIATES

Samuel Brothers

Sabrina Feve

Marcus Rogers

Douglas White
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001050119
<NAME> DDi CAPITAL CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             180                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,656                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,040)                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     26,220                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,831                       0
<PP&E>                                         117,141                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                (51,340)                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 364,193                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,741                       0
<BONDS>                                        330,516                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (43,175)                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   364,193                       0
<SALES>                                         86,912                 162,197
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                86,912                 162,197
<CGS>                                           55,875                 104,910
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,875                 104,910
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,114                  33,111
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,504                  20,204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,419                   3,972
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,953)                 (2,624)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,466                   1,348
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (670)                   (670)
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,796                     678
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>