alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
 
                                  EXHIBIT 11

                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


                                           Three Months Ended March 31,
                                               1997             1996   
                                           ----------        ----------  
                                                                    
Primary                                                             
                                                                    
Weighted average Premier common shares                              
  outstanding during the year               4,249,401         4,245,339  
                                                                          
Common shares issuable in connection                                      
  with assumed exercise of options under                                  
  the treasury stock method                    80,908            51,280  
                                           ----------        ----------  
Total                                       4,330,309         4,296,619  
                                           ==========        ==========  
                                                                          
Net income                                 $1,151,265        $  763,378  
                                           ==========        ==========  
                                                                          
Per share earnings                         $     0.27        $     0.18  
                                           ==========        ==========
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 226 (Monday, November 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 69936]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27705]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-73627; File No. SR-CME-2014-28]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc.; 
Notice of Withdrawal of Proposed Rule Change Related to Enhancements to 
Risk Model for Credit Default Swaps

November 18, 2014.
    On August 8, 2014, Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (``CME'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant 
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 \1\ and Rule 
19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change (SR-CME-2014-28) relating 
to CME's Risk Model for Credit Default Swaps (``CDS'') as it applied 
only to broad-based index CDS products cleared by CME, and would not be 
applicable to security-based swaps. Notice of the proposed rule change 
was published in the Federal Register on August 18, 2014.\3\ Notice of 
Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change was published in the 
Federal Register on September 8, 2014.\4\ The Commission did not 
receive comments on the proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-72834 (August 13, 
2014), 79 FR 48805 (August 18, 2014) (SR-CME-2014-28).
    \4\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-72959 (September 2, 
2014), 79 FR 53234 (September 8, 2014) (SR-CME-2014-28). On August 
18, 2014, CME filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change. CME 
withdrew Amendment No. 1 on August 29, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On October 1, 2014, the Commission extended the time period in 
which to either approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the 
proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to determine whether to 
disapprove the proposed rule change to November 16, 2014.\5\ On 
November 14, 2014, CME withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-CME-2014-
28).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-73283 (October 1, 
2014), 79 FR 60563 (October 7, 2014) (SR-CME-2014-28).
    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-27705 Filed 11-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 614 Received in Senate (RDS)]







105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 614


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 19, 1998

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
   Appointing the authorizing managers for the impeachment trial of 
       William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United States.

    Resolved, That Mr. Hyde of Illinois, Mr. Sensenbrenner of 
Wisconsin, Mr. McCollum of Florida, Mr. Gekas of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
Canady of Florida, Mr. Buyer of Indiana, Mr. Bryant of Tennessee, Mr. 
Chabot of Ohio, Mr. Barr of Georgia, Mr. Hutchinson of Arkansas, Mr. 
Cannon of Utah, Mr. Rogan of California, and Mr. Graham of South 
Carolina are appointed managers to conduct the impeachment trial 
against William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United States, that 
a message be sent to the Senate to inform the Senate of these 
appointments, and that the managers so appointed may, in connection 
with the preparation and the conduct of the trial, exhibit the articles 
of impeachment to the Senate and take all other actions necessary, 
which may include the following:
            (1) Employing legal, clerical, and other necessary 
        assistants and incurring such other expenses as may be 
        necessary, to be paid from amounts available to the Committee 
        on the Judiciary under applicable expense resolutions or from 
        the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives.
            (2) Sending for persons and papers, and filing with the 
        Secretary of the Senate, on the part of the House of 
        Representatives, any pleadings, in conjunction with or 
        subsequent to, the exhibition of the articles of impeachment 
        that the managers consider necessary.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 19, 1998.

                

                                                 NEWT GINGRICH,

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.`
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-51295 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RAUL CHAVEZ-ZARZA, also known as Romero Gonzalez-Zarza, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. ER-01-CR-1125-1-EP

-------------------- August 21, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Raul Chavez-Zarza (“Chavez”) appeals the sentencing following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). Chavez argues that the felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an element of the offense that should have been charged in his indictment. He also argues that in light ofNo. 01-51295 -2- Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), the district court erred in imposing a sentence greater than the two-year maximum sentence permissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 because the Government did not plead Chavez’ prior aggravated felony in the indictment. Chavez acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issues for Supreme Court review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; see also United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). Chavez’ argument is foreclosed. See Almendarez-Torres , 523 U.S. at 235. For the foregoing reasons Chavez’ sentence is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the quarterly report of Patriot Scientific Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 29, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an
exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of the Company does hereby
certify, pursuant to Rule 13a–14(b) or Rule 15d–14(b) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
April 9, 2008






/s/
      Clifford L.
      FlowersClifford L.
      FlowersChief
      Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Standard Companies
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Frederic M. Poses, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

/s/ Frederic M. Poses
Frederic M. Poses
Chief Executive Officer

May 1, 2003

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is
accompanying the Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a
separate disclosure document.
HMM Reference NIST Technical Note 2205: Item 24c Exterior Door (Sliding)

Photo 2047

Item 24c Exterior Door (Sliding) – Noncombustible sliding doors reduce risk of ignition to home interior.

Non wood sliding door

Non wood sliding door

Note: Selected photographs are included to illustrate each HMM hardening item. Additional vulnerabilities or hardening items may be seen in the photographs, but those are highlighted within their specific HMM item.
There is no CAD drawing for 

Item 24c: Exterior Door (Sliding) 

Please see photographs for illustrations.
|   | **** |
|--------|------|

**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

| November 10, 2006 | By:    | /s/         Harry N. Stout |   |
|-------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| (Date)

     |   | Harry N. Stout

President

                              |   |

 

 

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM HAVANA
REPUBLIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FORM 10-QSB FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                  638,232
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            10,234
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                             792,838
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      1,772,822
<PP&E>                                  552,674
<DEPRECIATION>                           70,376
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        2,625,696
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   402,057
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                           1,230,610
<COMMON>                              2,871,510
<OTHER-SE>                           (1,878,481)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          2,625,696
<SALES>                                 265,482
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        265,482
<CGS>                                    92,560
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            92,560
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        229,224
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        (56,302)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        5,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (51,769)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (51,769)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            (51,769)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.00
        

</TABLE>
#### Elias Robinson, etc., *v.*Benj. Powell, etc.

Trusts — Holding Partition Land in Trust.

■Where land was bought and paid for with the product of the joint labor of I. and J., but afterwards I. and J. partitioned the land between themselves., 'and each occupied the 'land as thus divided until the death of I., it was held that I. and his heirs held such, portion of the land in trust for J. and his vendees.

APPEAL FROM KNOX CIRCUIT COURT.

January 25, 1873.

*Rodman, for appellant.*

*James, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

Although the judgment of John Swafford against the children and heirs of Isaac Swafford%may be regarded as void, still in this case it is shown by a very decided preponderance of the evidence that the original purchase of the land was made for the joint benefit of Isaac and John Swafford, that it was paid for with corn which was the product of their joint labor, and was their joint property; and although the title was made to Isaac alone, they afterwards agreed upon a division of the land, had the dividing line of the tract run out, and each held to that line while Isaac lived, and after his death there was no change. From all the facts proved it is clear that Isaac Swafford and his heirs since held the land now in possession of appellee in trust for John Swafford and his vendees, and their possession should not be disturbed.

Wherefore the judgment is. *affirmed.*
Honor ableThomas C. Mummert, III, United States Magistrate Judge for th e 1 Eastern D istrict of Missouri, to whom the case was submitted with the consent of the parties in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-2657

_____________ Nelson W. McVey, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of * Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: December 12, 1997 Filed: December 18, 1997

_____________ Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Nelson W. McVey appeals the judgment of the District Court affirming th e 1 Commissioner's denial of McVey's application for disability benefits. Havin g considered all of McVey's a rguments for reversal, we conclude the administrative law judge properly evaluated the opinions of the treating physicians, properly discounted-2-

McVey's subjective complaints, and properly determined that McVey could perform the full range of sedentary work and therefore was not disabled. This c ase presents no novel issues to justify extended discussion. Th e administrative decision

is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole, and the judgment of the District Court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 32


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, the undersigned, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:


     o    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Perfisans  Holdings,  Inc. (the
          "Company")  for the period ended  September 30, 2004,  fully  complies
          with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934; and

     o    the information  contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Date:   November 15, 2004


                                             /s/ To-Hon Lam
                                             ------------------------------
                                             To-Hon Lam
                                             Chief Executive Officer &
                                             Principal Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ICG FUNDING, LLC FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               2,223
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     2,223
<PP&E>                                               0<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       2,223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                1,116
<BONDS>                                              4,699
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              128,719
<PREFERRED>                                          0<F1>
<COMMON>                                             0<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                        (132,311)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          2,223
<SALES>                                               0<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0<F1>
<CGS>                                                 0<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (131,281)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    (221)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (125,369)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (125,369)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0<F1>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0<F1>
<CHANGES>                                             0<F1>
<NET-INCOME>                                      (125,369)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0<F1>



</TABLE>
#### Thomas Dawson *v.*John Conklin.

Trial — Order of Reception of Evidence.

■ • Evidence -which ought to have been offered in chief is inadmissible when it is offered after the evidence in chief has been closed on ■both sides. '

APPEAL FROM' CALDWELL CIRCUIT COURT.

April 2, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Hardin :

On a careful consideration of the several grounds relied on in the argument for reversing the judgment, they are each deemed unreasonable.

1. The agreement to pay for half the work in Lyon County bonds at 85 cents on the dollar, fixed the value of those bonds as between the parties at $85 for each $100 so to be paid in bonds. Numerous authorities might be cited as sustaining this construction, even in addition to those relied on in the argument for the appellees. And we understand it to' be “substantially the ruling of the court in Instruction No. 10, and others relating to the lands.”

2. We do not think the jury could have been confused or misled as to the item of $23.10 by the supposed inconsistency of Instructions 8 and 10, but however the facts might be as to the $23.10, the instructions were authorized by the pleadings.

3. The burden of proof being on the defendant and the consequent right to open the case in evidence and conclude the argument being conceded to him, the court properly ruled that his own pro- ' *601posed testimony, which would have been clearly in chief, though offered as contradicting Coughlin, was inadmissible when offered, the evidence in chief then being closed on both sides.

*Hewlett, for appellant..*

*Darby, for appellee.*

4. There is contrariety of evidence and some uncertainty as to the disputed facts, but we can not adjudge that the verdict of the jury is not sufficiently supported by the evidence.

The judgment is *affirmed.*
Order entered July 26, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00585-CV

WALTON & MARIE BROWN, Appellants

V.

POTTER CONCRETE RESIDENTIAL, LTD., ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-10-09065-A

ORDER

The Court has before it appellants’ emergency unopposed second motion for extension to 

file appellants’ opening brief. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS appellants to file 

their brief by July 30, 2013. No further extensions will be allowed absent a showing of 

exceptional circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-16-00229-CR

Manuel Abelardo Rojas

v.

The State of Texas

On appeal from the

370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CR-1349-08-G

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

May 19, 2016