alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FISSEA 

Security Awareness, Training, and Education 

Contest 

Gretchen Morris, CISSP 

FISSEA Working Group Member 

March 2016 
 

 

 

 

Contest 

Categories 

±Website 

±Motivational Item 

±Poster 

±Newsletter 

±Video *new! 

±Training 

Judges 

± Not affiliated with any 

of the groups that 

submitted entries 

± From various positions 

and industries 
Website Entries (2) 


Website Winner! 
 

 

 

 

Lisa Dorr, Sarah Moffat, Toney 

Rogers, and Jennifer Kimberly 

Organization: 

HHS, Office of Information Security (OIS), 

Governance, Risk Management, and
 

Compliance (GRC) – Governance Division
 

Motivational Item Entries (2) 
Reference Card 

Motivational Item Winner! 
 

K Rudolph
 

Organization:
 

Native Intelligence, Inc.
 

Poster Entries (11) 











Poster Winner! 
 

 

K Rudolph, John Ippolito, 

G. Mark Hardy, Andrew Ellis, 

& Charles A. Filius
 

Organization:
 

Native Intelligence, Inc. and Friends
 

Newsletter Entries (7) 







Newsletter Winner! 
 

 

 

IHS Division of Information
 

Security
 

Organization:
 Indian Health Service, Office of Information
 

Technology, Division of Information Security
 

Video Entries (6) 
 

Video 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpmdhQEanzc 

Video 2: https://youtu.be/lPyrGvkDdek 

Video 3: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch? 

feature=player_embedded&v=xfEf8jzTILk 

Video 4: https://youtu.be/3hHnT1szO7c 

Video 5: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Regfcjtqa08 

Video 6: 

https://vimeo.com/infosightinc/review/71762956/3a70dcbc50
 
Video Winner! 
 

 

Cheryl Seaman &
 

Stephanie Erickson
 

Organization:
 

The National Institutes of Health
 
h+ps://youtu.be/3hHnT1szO7c
 
Training Entries (3) 



Training Winner! 
 

The ESDC Security Training 

and Awareness Program Team
 

Organization:
 

Employment and Social
 

Development Canada (ESDC) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peer’s Choice Awards 

±Part of the Government Best Practice Session 

today 

° Stop by and see the full entries and descriptions 

up close 

° Vote for your favorites (1 from each category) 

° Winners will be announced during the closing 

session Wednesday 

° Peer’s Choice Award Winners will be listed along 

side the official Contest winners on the FISSEA 

Website 

± No official award certificate...

 just bragging rights J
 

 

 

Thanks to all 

who submitted entries! 

A special thanks to our 

judges!
H. Res. 566

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 20, 1998.

Whereas the water resources of the Great Lakes Basin are

precious public natural resources, shared and held in

trust by the Great Lakes States and the Canadian Provinces;

Whereas the Great Lakes need to be carefully managed and

protected in order to meet current and future water

needs within the Great Lakes Basin and the Canadian

Provinces;

Whereas any new diversions of Great Lakes waters for use

outside of the Great Lakes Basin will have significant adverse effects on the environment, economy, and welfare of

the Great Lakes region;

Whereas the Province of Ontario, Canada, has authorized an

Ontario company to divert water from the Great Lakes

for sale to Asia;

Whereas 4 of the Great Lakes contain international waters,

and are defined as ‘‘boundary waters’’ in the Boundary

Waters Treaty of 1909 between the United States and

Canada, and therefore any new diversion of Great Lakes

water would affect the relations between the Government

of the United States and the Government of Canada;
2

•HRES 566 EH

Whereas as trustees of the Great Lakes Basin’s natural resources, the Great Lakes States and Provinces have a

shared duty to protect, conserve, and manage the renewable but finite waters of the Great Lakes Basin for the

use, benefit, and enjoyment of all their citizens, and future generations; and

Whereas the most effective means of protecting, conserving,

and managing the water resources of the Great Lakes is

through the joint pursuit of unified and cooperative principles, policies, and programs mutually agreed upon, enacted, and adhered to by each and every Great Lakes

State and Province: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the President and the Senate should act

3 to prevent the sale or diversion of Great Lakes water to

4 foreign countries, businesses, corporations, and individuals

5 until procedures are established to guarantee that any

6 such sale or diversion is fully negotiated and approved by

7 representatives of the United States Government and the

8 Government of Canada, in consultation with any Great

9 Lakes State or Province that could be impacted by such

10 a sale or diversion.

Attest:

Clerk.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Cannon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Solectron Corporation on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended
February 27, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Solectron Corporation.

Date: April 9, 2004

                                           /s/ Michael Cannon
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Michael Cannon
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersignedofficers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and

result of operations of the Company.
|   |   |                       |
|--------|--------|----------------------------|
| By:    |   | /s/ GEOFFREY S. M. HEDRICK |   |
|   |   | GEOFFREY S. M. HEDRICK     |
|   |   | CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND  |
|   |   | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER    |

 

August 8, 2007
|        |                    |
|--------|-------------------------|
| /s/    | JAMES J. REILLY         |   |
|   | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER |

 

August 8, 2007

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 27, 2010 

d0920 

Order 

 

September 27, 2010 

140051(47) 

RANDY ALDERMAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140051 

 COA: 285744 

Oakland CC: 2007-082233-NO 

J.C. DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITIES, L.L.C., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s April 30, 

2010 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

 KELLY, C.J., would grant the motion for reconsideration.
Exhibit 21.0

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

Registrant:            SI
Financial Group, Inc.



|                                         |  |                     |  |                                      
|---------------------------------------- |  | ------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Subsidiaries                             |  | PercentageOwnership |  | Jurisdiction orState of Incorporation
|Savings Institute Bank and Trust Company |  | 100%                |  | United States                        
|SI Capital Trust II(1)                   |  | 100%                |  | Delaware                             
|803 Financial Corp.(2)                   |  | 100%                |  | Connecticut                          
|SI Realty Company, Inc.(2)               |  | 100%                |  | Connecticut                          
|SI Mortgage Company(2)                   |  | 100%                |  | Connecticut                          



|(1) | In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,SI Capital Trust II is not
included in the Companys consolidated financial statements.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | Wholly-owned subsidiary of Savings Institute Bank and Trust Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 15.(a).1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-120559, 333-164250 and 333-164351) pertaining to the Employees Stock Option Plan of Syneron Medical Ltd. of our reports dated March 28, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Syneron Medical Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2010 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Syneron Medical Ltd. included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2010.




Haifa, Israel

KOST, FORER, GABBAY and KASIERERMarch 28, 2011

A member of Ernst & Young Global
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3


                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED ACCOUNTANTS


     We have issued our report dated January 20, 1997, accompanying the
financial statements of Bayard Drilling Technologies, Inc. contained in
Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1. We consent to the use of the 
aforementioned report in the Amendment and to the use of our name as it appears
under the captions "Independent Public Accountants" and "Selected Consolidated
Financial and Operating Data".


                                        /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
                                        GRANT THORNTON LLP


   
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
March 26, 1998
Exhibit 10.20  (Form of First Amendment to Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement with
all non-management directors)  FIRST AMENDMENT TO RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT  This
First Amendment to Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (Amendment)
is made and entered into by and among                                       (Grantee)
and Texas Roadhouse, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company).  Grantee
and the Company are sometimes referred to collectively in this Amendment as the
Parties.  WHEREAS,the Parties entered into that certain Restricted
Stock Unit Award dated on or about                                
(the Agreement); and  WHEREAS,the Parties now desire to amend the Agreement.  NOW THEREFORE,for good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby
agree as follows:  1.Capitalized terms not otherwise defined
herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.  2.Paragraph 6 of Article II
of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:  6.Assumption or
Substitution on Change in Control.  Upon a Corporate Transaction that is a change
in ownership under Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-3(i)(5)(v) (generally,
a person or group acquires more than 50% of the total fair market value or
voting power of stock) or that is a change in ownership of assets under Section 1.409A3(i)(5)(vii) (generally,
a sale of 40% or more of assets), the Award shall become 100% immediately
vested 5 days prior to the Corporate Transaction, and the Company may, in its
discretion, pay the Restricted Stock Units at that time in cash rather than
issuing Shares to Grantee.  Such cash
payment shall be equal to the fair value of the Shares on the date they would
otherwise be issued in accordance with the preceding sentence, as reflected by
the transaction giving rise to a Corporate Transaction, or if such transaction
is not a sale of Shares, fair value as determined in good faith by the Company.  3.Except as
expressly amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.  [Signature page follows.]  1


(Form of First Amendment to Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement with
all non-management directors)  IN WITNESS WHEREOF,and intending to be legally
bound thereby, Grantee and the Company have executed the foregoing Amendment on
the dates set forth below.   TEXAS ROADHOUSE, INC.Dated:
  
  
  By:Name:
  Scott M. ColosiIts:
  Chief Financial OfficerDated:
  
  
  By:Name:  2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

EMOJI COMPANY GmbH, )

) Case No. 20-cv-5068

Plaintiff, ) 

)

) Judge Virginia M. Kendall

v. )

)

THE INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, )

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, )

PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED )

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED )

ON SCHEDULE A HERETO, )

)

Defendants. )

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff EMOJI COMPANY 

GmbH hereby dismisses with prejudice all causes of action in the complaint against the following 

Defendants identified in Schedule A. Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs.

No. Defendant 

16 jokerr

46 NANTONGJIUFENG

68 joyprint

79 MAHU

184 NOMIMAS

193 KRYSTYMG

194 Lancerry

195 MOFEIYUE

229 hanyuan Jewelry

235 HousingMart

Case: 1:20-cv-05068 Document #: 58 Filed: 01/11/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:3160
The respective Defendants have not filed an answer to the complaint or a motion for summary 

judgment in this matter. Therefore, it is respectfully submitted that dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is 

appropriate.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: January 11, 2021 By: s/Michael A. Hierl _ 

Michael A. Hierl (Bar No. 3128021)

William B. Kalbac (Bar No. 6301771)

Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd.

Three First National Plaza

70 W. Madison Street, Suite 4000

Chicago, Illinois 60602

(312) 580-0100 Telephone

mhierl@hsplegal.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

EMOJI COMPANY GmbH

Case: 1:20-cv-05068 Document #: 58 Filed: 01/11/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:3161
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned attorney hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of 

Voluntary Dismissal was filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court and served on all counsel of 

record and interested parties via the CM/ECF system on January 11, 2021.

s/Michael A. Hierl

Case: 1:20-cv-05068 Document #: 58 Filed: 01/11/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:3162
CHIPS for America Fact Sheet February 28, 2023

1

Funding Opportunity – Commercial Fabrication Facilities 

FACT SHEET: 

Catalyzing Private Investment 

CHIPS for America seeks to catalyze private investment in the semiconductor industry, not displace it. For each 

application, the CHIPS Program Office will dedicate the minimum amount of federal funding necessary to 

accomplish program goals, and it aims to attract significant private capital to create economically viable projects 

at sufficient scale. To advance U.S. economic and national security, the CHIPS Program Office has set the 

following priorities for its investment strategy: 

• Significant activation of private capital. The CHIPS Program Office will give preference to projects based 

on the degree to which they have activated significant private capital, whether from applicants or from 

third parties. This will increase the scale of investment available and ensure that CHIPS funding 

complements private markets rather than crowding them out.

• Creative financing structures. The CHIPS Program Office encourages applicants to think creatively and 

holistically about how to finance projects. In addition to committing their own capital and seeking thirdparty investment across the risk-reward spectrum—including from new sources of capital that may not 

typically participate in the space, such as private debt and infrastructure funds—applicants should 

consider applying for CHIPS loans and/or loan guarantees as a complement to direct funding requests.

• Customer commitments and self-sustaining ecosystems. To fund projects that will be competitive over 

time, the CHIPS Program Office encourages applicants to create ecosystems (e.g., of suppliers, 

customers, and workforce training organizations) that increase the likelihood that investments will 

become self-sustaining. In addition, the CHIPS Program Office encourages the use of customer financing, 

offtake agreements, prepayments, or other customer contributions to capital or operating expenses 

that can strengthen a project’s finances. 

• Upside sharing for direct funding recipients over $150 million. As part of its commitment to protect 

taxpayer dollars, the CHIPS Program Office will require recipients of more than $150 million in direct 

funding to share with the U.S. government a portion of any cash flows or returns that exceed the 

applicant’s projections above an agreed-upon threshold. The CHIPS Program Office will use any upside 

sharing proceeds to further the objectives of the CHIPS Act and strengthen the U.S. semiconductor 

ecosystem. Upside sharing will vary from project to project and will likely be material only in instances 

where the project significantly exceeds its projected cash flows.
DISASTER CITY
DISASTER 

CITY

Directions to DHS/NIST/TEEX Response Robot Evaluation Exercise 

Disaster City, College Station, TX 

From FM 2818 Harvey Mitchell Parkway (west of intersection with FM 2154 Wellborn Road) 

• Turn onto N. Dowling Road 

• Right onto Stillwater Road 

• Enter Disaster City Gate E is straight ahead 

• Parking area is just inside the gate to right (overflow in field to left) 

• Accountability check-in, badge pickup, and safety briefings in metal buildings to right 

GATE E
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>  9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          52,311
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                41,030
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    198,742
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         202,592
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           198,742
<LOANS>                                      1,355,106
<ALLOWANCE>                                     16,957
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,693,318
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,309,691
<SHORT-TERM>                                    98,900
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             11,203
<LONG-TERM>                                    120,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,446
<COMMON>                                        28,274
<OTHER-SE>                                     122,054
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,693,318
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 89,850
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                8,305
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 3,134
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               101,289
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              38,507
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,108
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           53,674
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,854
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  29
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 56,579
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,253
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      22,253
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,566
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.54
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,298
<LOANS-PAST>                                        29
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                15,681
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,055
<RECOVERIES>                                       477
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               16,957
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of Illinois

219 South Dearborn Street

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Thomas G. Bruton 312-435-5670

Clerk

Case: 1:20-cv-05206 Document #: 80 Filed: 09/14/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:834