alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                             NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Novellus Systems, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 28, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kevin S. Royal, Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the
date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the
United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

           (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
               and

           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
               indicated.

Date: November 12, 2002                By: /s/ Kevin S. Royal
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Kevin S. Royal
                                           Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
# FILED June 12, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk 

### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE CHARLES MONTAGUE, ) Davidson Chancery ) No. 96-3872-III Plaintiff/Appellant, ) ) VS. ) Appeal No. ) 01A01-9711-CH-00667 TENNESSEE DEPARTMEN T OF ) CORRECTIONS, ) ) Defendant/Appellee, )



## O R D E R The appellant has filed a petition to rehear which has been examined and found to be without merit. It is therefore denied.

___________________________________ HENRY F. TODD PRESIDING JUDGE, MIDDL E SECTION

___________________________________ BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE

___________________________________ WILLIA M C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>                                                           5 

        
<S>                                                       <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                  12-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         FEB-28-1986 
<PERIOD-START>                                            MAR-01-1995 
<PERIOD-END>                                              FEB-28-1986 
<CASH>                                                              0 
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    0 
<PP&E>                                                              0 
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                      0 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       1,000,828 
<BONDS>                                                             0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                                         0 
<COMMON>                                                       33,917
<OTHER-SE>                                                  1,141,299
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               (1,000,828) 
<SALES>                                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    0 
<CGS>                                                               0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                                   46,812
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0 

         

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC
Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                              13
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      241
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          3
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   254
<PP&E>                                            5561
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (3760)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2112
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              439
<BONDS>                                           1180
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1945
<OTHER-SE>                                         108
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2112
<SALES>                                            912
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   896
<CGS>                                              548
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      548
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    93
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  71
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    184
<INCOME-TAX>                                        57
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                131
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       131
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.24
        

</TABLE>
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**28 KA 14-01055**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
LISA E. HENDERSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

LEANNE LAPP, PUBLIC DEFENDER, CANANDAIGUA (CARA A. WALDMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
R. MICHAEL TANTILLO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (V. CHRISTOPHER EAGGLESTON OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (Craig J. Doran, J.), rendered June 3, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the third degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Entered: February 3, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
SUMMARY OF AMENDMENTS TO EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN



 Exhibit 10(ee) 
  
 SUMMARY OF AMENDMENTS TO 
 THE SPRINT SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN 
  
 The Sprint Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”), filed as Exhibit 10(l) to Sprint’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the
year ended December 31, 2001, was amended to preclude from participation persons employed by Nextel prior to the merger of Sprint and Nextel. In addition, the SERP was amended to provide that accruals under all benefit formulas of the SERP will
cease on December 31, 2005 for each participant, except for any participant who is specifically designated to provide services to Sprint Nextel in connection with the New Local Company or a participant to which Sprint Nextel is obligated to
provide benefit accruals as of the date of the merger under an employment agreement.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MEDINA LYNN SOUDERS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 464 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of December, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
**Exhibit 31.1** **CERTIFICATION**     I, Leonard A. Foxman, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of Eagle Test Systems, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     (b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition    instructions contained in SEC Release    No. 34-47986];     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to    materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over    financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors:     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.      By: /s/  Leonard    A. Foxman**Leonard A. Foxman****Chief Executive Officer and President**     Date: December 8, 2006
**EXHIBIT32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certifications setforth below are hereby submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commissionpursuant to, and solely for the purpose of complying with, Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code in connection with the filingon the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of MAIR Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”)for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”).

Each of the undersigned,the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of theCompany, hereby certifies that, as of the end of the period covered by theReport:

1.               Such Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/  PAUL F. FOLEY                    |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |
| Paul F. Foley                         |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| November 8, 2006                      |

 

 
| /s/ ROBERT E. WEIL                                     |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                   |
| Robert E. Weil                                         |
| Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and  Treasurer |
| November 8, 2006                                       |

 

----
10272.

#### Hattaway *v.*The State.

Decided May 7, 1919.

Indictment for manufacture of liquor; from Glascock superior court—Judge Walker. November 29, 1918.

*M. L. Felts,*for plaintiff in error.

*R. C. Norman, solicitor-general,*contra.

Beoyles, P. J.-

The motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds; the evidence amply authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion. *t*

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.*
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JESSE ADRIAN MARTINEZ

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 7

- 00253

- C R

Appeal from the

210 th District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 20160D03012 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant ’ s third motion for extension of time within which to

file the b rief until August 1 4

, 201 8

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO F ILE THE APPELLANT ’ S B R IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Ruben P. Morales

, the Appellant ’ s attorney, prepare

the Appellant ’ s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before August 1 4 , 201 8

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 17 th day of Ju ly

, 20 1 8

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
1

The Honorable Ortrie D. Smith, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-3326

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Jose Tomas Cuautle-Robles, * Western District of Missouri.

*

Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________

Submitted: February 21, 2008

 Filed: February 25, 2008

___________

Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Jose Tomas Cuautle-Robles appeals the 15-month prison sentence the district

court1

 imposed after he pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting the transportation of

illegal aliens within the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii),

(A)(v)(II), and (B)(ii). His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). For the following reasons, we affirm.
-2-

First, the district court did not clearly err in denying Cuautle-Robles’s request

for a mitigating-role reduction because he failed to prove he played a minimal or

minor role in the offense; instead, he admitted to knowingly aiding others in

transporting illegal aliens and keeping track of payments for the trip. See United

States v. Godinez, 474 F.3d 1039, 1042 (8th Cir. 2007) (standard of review; defendant

bears burden to prove he played minor role).

Second, we conclude that Cuautle-Robles’s within-Guidelines-range sentence

is not unreasonable: nothing in the record indicates the district court overlooked a

relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper factor, or made a clear error of

judgment in weighing appropriate factors. See Rita v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 2456,

2462-68 (2007); United States v. Haack, 403 F.3d 997, 1003-04 (8th Cir. 2005).

After reviewing the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,

80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to

withdraw, and we affirm the district court’s judgment.

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                          38,604
<SECURITIES>                                    28,976
<RECEIVABLES>                                  145,317
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,613
<INVENTORY>                                     88,143
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               342,763
<PP&E>                                         126,055
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 482,458
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          138,090
<BONDS>                                         65,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       152,800
<OTHER-SE>                                     126,568
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   482,458
<SALES>                                        371,174
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               371,174
<CGS>                                          170,130
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  170,130
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               359,023
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,923
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (155,056)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (37,008)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (118,048)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (118,048)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.57)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer of GFI GroupInc.**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of GFI Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K forthe fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James A. Peers, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to the 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: March 23, 2006 |
|---------------------------|
| /s/ JAMES A. PEERS        |
| James A. Peers            |
| Chief Financial Officer   |

 

----
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION











Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING USA Annuity and Life
Insurance Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s
knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











May 7, 2010
            By: /s/
            Ewout L.Steenbergen(Date)
            
            Ewout L. Steenbergen
              Executive Vice President and
              Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.3

March 30, 2007

Re: Letter Agreement, Bell Flat and Panorama Properties, Nevada.

The following agreementamendsthe general terms and conditions for the agreement between Desert Pacific Exploration, Inc. (DPE) and Homeland Precious Metals, Inc. (HPM) governing DPEs Bell Flat property, Churchill County, Nevada and Panorama property, Mineral County, Nevada, U. S. A. The parties hereto acknowledge that they have expressed herein the amended understanding and obligation of this Agreement combined with the original agreement dated April 30, 2005. It is expressly understood and agreed that this amendment of terms combined with the original agreement will constitute the entire agreement.



Form of Agreement
     Mining LeaseTerm
     5 years with extensions so long as conditions of the option are met.Production Royalties
     3.0% Net Smelter ReturnAdvance Royalties
     April 30, 2006
     Paid US$20,000.00April 30, 2007
     Paid US$10,000.00April 30, 2008
     US$10,000.00April 30, 2009
     US$50,000.00April 30, 2010
     US$70,000.00April 30, 2011
     US$150,000.00Work Commitments
     April 30, 2008
     US$100,000.00April 30, 2009
     US$250,000.00April 30, 2010
     US$300,000.00April 30, 2011
     US$400,000.00Performance Requirements
     Federal and state mining claim maintenance fees shall be kept in goodstanding and payments made before July 1 of any given year.Reclamation
     HPM shall perform reclamation work on the Property as required byFederal, State, and Local law for disturbances resulting from HPMsactivities on the Property.Interest Area
     One mile from the outside perimeter of the Bell Flat and Panorama claimboundaries.




If the above terms and conditions are consistent with our earlier discussions, please acknowledge by signing in the space provided below and return one copy. This document will serve to amend the original terms of the agreement previously adopted by DPE and HPM.



---

Letter Agreement, Montgomery Pass Panorama PropertyPage 2 of 2March 30, 2007Agreed and accepted to this 30th day of March, 2007.



By:HERB DUERR(President  Desert Pacific Exploration, Inc.)



By:BRUCE JOHNSTONE(President  Homeland Precious Metals, Inc.)





























---