I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3914

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require that violent video 

programming is limited to broadcast after the hours when children are 

reasonably likely to comprise a substantial portion of the audience, unless 

it is specifically rated on the basis of its violent content so that it 

is blockable by electronic means specifically on the basis of that content. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2004

Mr. BACA (for himself, Mr. OSBORNE, and Mr. PRICE of North Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require that 

violent video programming is limited to broadcast after 

the hours when children are reasonably likely to comprise 

a substantial portion of the audience, unless it is specifically rated on the basis of its violent content so that 

it is blockable by electronic means specifically on the 

basis of that content.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3914 IH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Children’s Protection 

3 from Violent Programming Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

5 The Congress makes the following findings: 

6 (1) Television influences children’s perception 

7 of the values and behavior that are common and ac8 ceptable in society. 

9 (2) Broadcast television, cable television, and 

10 video programming are—

11 (A) uniquely pervasive presences in the 

12 lives of all American children; and 

13 (B) readily accessible to all American chil14 dren. 

15 (3) Violent video programming influences chil16 dren, as does indecent programming. 

17 (4) There is empirical evidence that children ex18 posed to violent video programming at a young age 

19 have a higher tendency to engage in violent and ag20 gressive behavior later in life than those children not 

21 so exposed. 

22 (5) There is empirical evidence that children ex23 posed to violent video programming have a greater 

24 tendency to assume that acts of violence are accept25 able behavior and therefore to imitate such behavior. 
3

•HR 3914 IH 

1 (6) There is empirical evidence that children ex2 posed to violent video programming have an in3 creased fear of becoming a victim of violence, result4 ing in increased self-protective behaviors and in5 creased mistrust of others. 

6 (7) There is a compelling governmental interest 

7 in limiting the negative influences of violent video 

8 programming on children. 

9 (8) There is a compelling governmental interest 

10 in channeling programming with violent content to 

11 periods of the day when children are not likely to 

12 comprise a substantial portion of the television audi13 ence. 

14 (9) A significant amount of violent program15 ming that is readily accessible to minors remains 

16 unrated specifically for violence and therefore cannot 

17 be blocked solely on the basis of its violent content. 

18 (10) Age-based ratings that do not include con19 tent rating for violence do not allow parents to block 

20 programming based solely on violent content thereby 

21 rendering ineffective any technology-based blocking 

22 mechanism designed to limit violent video program23 ming. 

24 (11) The most recent study of the television 

25 ratings system by the Kaiser Family Foundation 
4

•HR 3914 IH 

1 concludes that 79 percent of violent programming is 

2 not specifically rated for violence. 

3 (12) Technology-based solutions, such as the V4 chip, may be helpful in protecting some children, but 

5 cannot achieve the compelling governmental interest 

6 in protecting all children from violent programming 

7 when parents are only able to block programming 

8 that has, in fact, been rated for violence. 

9 (13) Restricting the hours when violent pro10 gramming can be shown protects the interests of 

11 children whose parents are unavailable, unable to su12 pervise their children’s viewing behavior, do not have 

13 the benefit of technology-based solutions, are unable 

14 to afford the costs of technology-based solutions, or 

15 are unable to determine the content of those shows 

16 that are only subject to age-based ratings. 

17 (14) After further study, pursuant to a rule18 making, the Federal Communications Commission 

19 may conclude that content-based ratings and block20 ing technology do not effectively protect children 

21 from the harm of violent video programming. 

22 (15) If the Federal Communications Commis23 sion reaches the conclusion described in paragraph 

24 (14), the channeling of violent video programming 

25 will be the least restrictive means of limiting the ex-
5

•HR 3914 IH 

1 posure of children to the harmful influences of vio2 lent video programming. 

3 SEC. 3. ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTIVENESS OF CURRENT 

4 RATING SYSTEM FOR VIOLENCE AND EFFEC5 TIVENESS OF V-CHIP IN BLOCKING VIOLENT 

6 PROGRAMMING. 

7 (a) REPORT.—The Federal Communications Com8 mission shall—

9 (1) assess the effectiveness of measures to re10 quire television broadcasters and multichannel video 

11 programming distributors (as defined in section 

12 602(13) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 

13 U.S.C. 522(13)) to rate and encode programming 

14 that could be blocked by parents using the V-chip 

15 undertaken under section 715 of the Communica16 tions Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 715) and under sub17 sections (w) and (x) of section 303 of that Act (47 

18 U.S.C. 303(w) and (x)) in accomplishing the pur19 poses for which they were enacted; and 

20 (2) report its findings to the Committee on 

21 Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the 

22 United States Senate and the Committee on Energy 

23 and Commerce of the United States House of Rep24 resentatives, within 12 months after the date of en25 actment of this Act, and annually thereafter. 
6

•HR 3914 IH 

1 (b) ACTION.—If the Commission finds at any time, 

2 as a result of its ongoing assessment under subsection (a), 

3 that the measures referred to in subsection (a)(1) are in4 sufficiently effective, then the Commission shall complete 

5 a rulemaking within 270 days after the date on which the 

6 Commission makes that finding to prohibit the distribu7 tion of violent video programming during the hours when 

8 children are reasonably likely to comprise a substantial 

9 portion of the audience. 

10 (c) DEFINITIONS.—Any term used in this section 

11 that is defined in section 715 of the Communications Act 

12 of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 715), or in regulations under that sec13 tion, has the same meaning as when used in that section 

14 or in those regulations. 

15 SEC. 4. UNLAWFUL DISTRIBUTION OF VIOLENT VIDEO PRO16 GRAMMING THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY 

17 RATED FOR VIOLENCE AND THEREFORE IS 

18 NOT BLOCKABLE. 

19 Title VII of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 

20 U.S.C. 701 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the 

21 following: 
7

•HR 3914 IH 

1 ‘‘SEC. 715. UNLAWFUL DISTRIBUTION OF VIOLENT VIDEO 

2 PROGRAMMING NOT SPECIFICALLY 

3 BLOCKABLE BY ELECTRONIC MEANS. 

4 ‘‘(a) UNLAWFUL DISTRIBUTION.—It shall be unlaw5 ful for any person to distribute to the public any violent 

6 video programming not blockable by electronic means spe7 cifically on the basis of its violent content during hours 

8 when children are reasonably likely to comprise a substan9 tial portion of the audience. 

10 ‘‘(b) RULEMAKING PROCEEDING.—The Commission 

11 shall conduct a rulemaking proceeding to implement the 

12 provisions of this section and shall promulgate final regu13 lations pursuant to that proceeding not later than 9 

14 months after the date of enactment of the Children’s Pro15 tection from Violent Programming Act. As part of that 

16 proceeding, the Commission—

17 ‘‘(1) may exempt from the prohibition under 

18 subsection (a) programming (including news pro19 grams and sporting events) whose distribution does 

20 not conflict with the objective of protecting children 

21 from the negative influences of violent video pro22 gramming, as that objective is reflected in the find23 ings in section 551(a) of the Telecommunications 

24 Act of 1996; 
8

•HR 3914 IH 

1 ‘‘(2) shall exempt premium and pay-per-view 

2 cable programming and premium and pay-per-view 

3 direct-to-home satellite programming; and 

4 ‘‘(3) shall define the term ‘hours when children 

5 are reasonably likely to comprise a substantial por6 tion of the audience’ and the term ‘violent video pro7 gramming’. 

8 ‘‘(c) ENFORCEMENT.—

9 ‘‘(1) FORFEITURE PENALTY.—The forfeiture 

10 penalties established by section 503(b) for violations 

11 of section 1464 of title 18, United States Code, shall 

12 apply to a violation of this section, or any regulation 

13 promulgated under it in the same manner as if a 

14 violation of this section, or such a regulation, were 

15 a violation of law subject to a forfeiture penalty 

16 under that section 503. 

17 ‘‘(2) LICENSE REVOCATION.—If a person re18 peatedly violates this section or any regulation pro19 mulgated under this section, the Commission shall, 

20 after notice and opportunity for hearing, revoke any 

21 license issued to that person under this Act. 

22 ‘‘(3) LICENSE RENEWALS.—The Commission 

23 shall consider, among the elements in its review of 

24 an application for renewal of a license under this 

25 Act, whether the licensee has complied with this sec-
9

•HR 3914 IH 

1 tion and the regulations promulgated under this sec2 tion. 

3 ‘‘(d) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section—

4 ‘‘(1) BLOCKABLE BY ELECTRONIC MEANS.—

5 The term ‘blockable by electronic means’ means 

6 blockable by the feature described in section 303(x). 

7 ‘‘(2) DISTRIBUTE.—The term ‘distribute’ 

8 means to send, transmit, retransmit, telecast, broad9 cast, or cablecast, including by wire, microwave, or 

10 satellite, but it does not include the transmission, re11 transmission, or receipt of any voice, data, graphics, 

12 or video telecommunications accessed through an 

13 interactive computer service as defined in section 

14 230(f)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 

15 U.S.C. 230(f)(2)), which is not originated or trans16 mitted in the ordinary course of business by a tele17 vision broadcast station or multichannel video pro18 gramming distributor as defined in section 602(13) 

19 of that Act (47 U.S.C. 522(13)). 

20 ‘‘(3) VIOLENT VIDEO PROGRAMMING.—The 

21 term ‘violent video programming’ as defined by the 

22 Commission may include matter that is excessive or 

23 gratuitous violence within the meaning of the 1992 

24 Broadcast Standards for the Depiction of Violence 

25 in Television Programs, December 1992.’’. 
10

•HR 3914 IH 

1 SEC. 5. FTC STUDY OF MARKETING STRATEGY IMPROVE2 MENTS. 

3 The Federal Trade Commission shall continue to 

4 study the marketing of violent content by the motion pic5 ture, music recording, and computer and video game in6 dustries to children, including the improvements to mar7 keting practices developed and implemented by those in8 dustries. The Commission shall update its study and re9 port annually, including findings and recommendations, to 

10 the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Trans11 portation and the House of Representatives Committee on 

12 Energy and Commerce. 

13 SEC. 6. SEPARABILITY. 

14 If any provision of this Act, or any provision of an 

15 amendment made by this Act, or the application thereof 

16 to particular persons or circumstances, is found to be un17 constitutional, the remainder of this Act or that amend18 ment, or the application thereof to other persons or cir19 cumstances shall not be affected. 

20 SEC. 7. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

21 The prohibition contained in section 715 of the Com22 munications Act of 1934 (as added by section 4 of this 

23 Act) and the regulations promulgated thereunder shall 

24 take effect 1 year after the regulations are adopted by the 

25 Commission.

Æ