alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Standard Companies
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, G. Peter DAloia, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.  /s/G. Peter DAloia 
G. Peter DAloia 
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer October 29, 2004
10319.

#### Byrd *v.*Planters Warehouse Company.

Broyles, P. J.

This was a suit against a married woman on a promissory note executed solely by her. She admitted the execution of the note, but pleaded that its sole consideration was indebtedness of her husband. The verdict was against her, and she excepts to the overruling of her motion for a new trial, based on the usual general grounds. *Eeld-.*While thg evidence was in sharp conflict, this court can not say that the jury were not authorized to And therefrom that the defendant’s husband acted as her agent (although this agency was denied by the defendant upon the trial) in the purchase of the goods for which the note sued on was given, or to find that she subsequently ratified these acts of her agent by voluntarily signing the note sued on, or that the plaintiff, at the time the debt was created, really intended in good *812faith to extend the credit to her and not to the husband, and that the consideration of the debt passed legally and morally to her. See, in this connection, *Schofield*v. Jones, 85 *Ga.*810 (11 S. E. 1032). The ease of *Hill*v. *Bazemore,*17 *Ga. App.*107 (SO S. E. 397), cited by counsel for the plaintiff in error, is easily distinguishable by its particular facts from this case.

Decided June 13, 1919.

Complaint; from Taylor superior court—Judge Howard. November 16, 1918.

*C. W. Foy,*for plaintiff in error.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodioorth and Stephens, JJ., concur.*
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 28, 2009

l0921 

# Order

September 28, 2009

139010

MARTIN B. MARCUS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 139010 COA: 284042 Oakland CC: 2007-086327-CK GFG EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, INC., d/b/a GARDEN FRESH SALSA, INC., GARDEN FRESH SALSA CO., INC., BASHA FOODS, FRES HLANE TRANSIT, GARDEN FRESH SA LSA II, GOURMET INTERNATIONAL GOODS, and GFG II EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 28, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           339,528
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                          38
<MORTGAGE>                                      50,670
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 408,510
<CASH>                                          15,152
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          26,637
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,974,917
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                379,281
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              4,068
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 25,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     137,724
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,974,917
<PREMIUMS>                                           0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             11,492
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                  52
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  11,331
<BENEFITS>                                       9,840
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                        836
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            10,963
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     84
<INCOME-TAX>                                        66
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 18
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        18
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        







</TABLE>
Community Resilience Workshop - Data Needs for Resilience Planning and Decision-Making

22

Session 3: Community Resilience Priorities and Solutions

Gerry Horak, Fort Collins, CO, Mayor Pro Tem

Gerry Horak was re-elected to the Fort Collins City Council April 

2015 to represent the citizens of District 6 (northwest Fort Collins). 

He was the Mayor in 1984-1985. In April 2013, 2015 and 2017 he 

was elected Mayor Pro Tem. Since moving to Fort Collins forty years 

ago, Gerry has resided in the northwest district. He was elected four 

times to represent the citizens of northwest Fort Collins and served on 

the city council from 1981-1994. Gerry provided leadership in open, 

responsive, accountable and fiscally responsible government. He was 

instrumental in changing the City’s position from opposition to 

support of the Wild and Scenic Designation of the Cache La Poudre 

River as well as the establishment of the Natural Areas Program and the expansion of trails and 

open spaces.

Gerry currently serves as Vice Chair on the National League of Cities Energy, Environment and 

Natural Resources Policy Committee and the University Communities Council. During his 

previous tenure on council he also served on the NLC EENR Steering and Policy Committees. 

He is a founding steering committee member for WaterNow. He also represents the City Council 

on the Platte River Power Authority, Poudre Fire Authority, North Front Range Transportation 

and Air Quality Planning Organization, I-25 Coalition, Boxelder Basin Regional Stormwater 

Authority and the Larimer County Open Lands Advisory Board. In 2014, Governor John 

Hickenlopper appointed Gerry to the Regional Air Quality Commission and reappointed him in 

2016.

Gerry has degrees in economics and geography (BS Towson State University), resource 

economics (MA Johns Hopkins University), and a Ph.D. in wildlife biology from Colorado State 

University. 

Abstract:

Resiliency Results from Plans, Implementation, and Collaboration

Fort Collins has a history of planning, implementing our plans and continually updating the plans 

and the implementing the measures. We, like many communities, use our watercourses for water 

supply, storm water management, recreation and open space. Over the last 40 years we have 

developed an integrated system to minimize loss of life and property damage from floods and 

fires through distributed infrastructure. We proactively work with surrounding jurisdictions 

utilizing the Larimer County Resiliency Framework, Larimer County Hazard Mitigation Plan 

and the Fort Collins Resiliency and Recovery Assessment Program.
H. Res. 68

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 11, 1997.

Whereas the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security Between the United States of America and Japan is critical

to the security interests of the United States, Japan, and

the countries of the Asia-Pacific region;

Whereas the security relationship between the United States

and Japan is the foundation for the security strategy of

the United States in the Asia-Pacific region;

Whereas strong bilateral security ties between the two countries provide a key stabilizing influence in an uncertain

post-cold war world;

Whereas this bilateral security relationship makes it possible

for the United States and Japan to preserve their interests in the Asia-Pacific region;

Whereas forward-deployed forces of the United States are

welcomed by allies of the United States in the region because such forces are critical for maintaining stability in

East Asia;

Whereas regional stability has undergirded East Asia’s economic growth and prosperity;

Whereas the recognition by allies of the United States of the

importance of United States armed forces for security in
2

•HRES 68

the Asia-Pacific region confers on the United States irreplaceable good will and diplomatic influence in that region;

Whereas Japan’s host nation support is a key element in the

ability of the United States to maintain forward-deployed

forces in that country;

Whereas the Governments of the United States and Japan,

in the Special Action Committee on Okinawa Final Report issued by the United States-Japan Security Consultative Committee established by the two countries, made

commitments to reducing the burdens of United States

armed forces on the people of Japan, especially the people of Okinawa;

Whereas such commitments must maintain the operational

capability and readiness of United States forces; and

Whereas gaining the understanding and support of the people

of Japan, especially the people of Okinawa, in fulfilling

these commitments is crucial to the effective implementation of the Treaty: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that—

3 (1) the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Se4 curity Between the United States of America and

5 Japan remains vital to the security interests of the

6 United States and Japan, as well as the countries of

7 the Asia-Pacific region; and

8 (2) the people of Japan, especially the people of

9 Okinawa, deserve special recognition and gratitude
3

•HRES 68

1 for their contributions toward ensuring the Treaty’s

2 implementation and regional peace and stability.

Attest:

Clerk.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed 

October 30, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00789-CV

IN RE AMELIA V. KELLY, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

122nd District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11CV0325

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 1, 2014, relator Amelia V. Kelly filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 

52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable John Ellisor, 

presiding judge of the 122nd District Court of Galveston County, to vacate three 

orders pertaining to a motion by the real party in interest to enforce the final 

judgment in the underlying litigation by foreclosure of relator’s real property.
2

Relator has not satisfied her burden to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus 

relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We also lift 

our stay granted on October 3, 2014.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison, and Donovan.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AYODELE AKINOLA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

DAVID SEVERNS; MIKE PREMO,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-16066

D.C. No. 3:14-cv-00222-HDMWGC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Howard D. McKibben, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 8, 2017**

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Ayodele Akinola appeals from the district court’s March 26, 2015 order

dismissing his First Amendment retaliation claim in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action 

alleging race discrimination in his employment with the State of Nevada’s 

Department of Transportation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 23 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-16066 

review de novo a dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Lacey v. Maricopa 

County, 693 F.3d 896, 911 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc). We reverse and remand. 

The district court dismissed Akinola’s retaliation claim because it did not 

involve a matter of public concern. However, taking the factual allegations as true, 

Akinola alleged facts sufficient to show that his complaints about race 

discrimination, which were directed to a personnel manager and set forth in his 

earlier lawsuit, involved a matter of public concern. See Turner v. City & County 

of San Francisco, 788 F.3d 1206, 1210 (9th Cir. 2015) (stating the elements of a 

First Amendment retaliation claim); Alpha Energy Savers, Inc. v. Hansen, 381 

F.3d 917, 926 (9th Cir. 2004) (declining to adopt view that a “run of the mine 

single-plaintiff discrimination case” does not meet the public concern test). We 

reverse and remand for further proceedings on the retaliation claim only. 

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

We deny Defendants-Appellees’ motion to take judicial notice (Docket 

Entry No. 24) as unnecessary.

REVERSED and REMANDED.
#### J. Q. Ward, Trustee, etc., *v.*S. G. Stevenson.

Vendor and Purchaser — Cancellation of Sale — Failure to Open Street.

A statement in the sale of land, relative to what had been done- and the opinion of the vendors as to what the -council would do in regard to opening a street, is not ground for cancelling the contract of sale upon the failure of the council to open the street.

Vendor and Purchaser — Presumption—Knowledge of Other Sale — Waiver.

Where other land was -sold at the time plaintiff entered into- his contract of purchase, -he must he presumed to have entered into- the contract with knowledge of the -other sale, -and to have waived any cause -of objection which he may have had to it.

APPEAL FROM HARRIS-ON CIRCUIT COURT.

January 18, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Hardin :

Admitting the facts of the case to be substantially as stated by the circuit judge in his opinion, we can not concur in the conclusion, of the lower court. As to the failure of the city to open Church Street, or rather to extend it, as seems to have been contemplated, there is neither allegation nor proof of fraud on the part of Ward or Dills. It appears that they authorized the auctioneer to announce, and stated themselves, the ordinance of the city council for opening the street; it may be true that a writ had issued preliminary to condemning the land over which the proposed extension of the street would run; but it still does not appear, and in fact, is not *358alleged, that they did more than to honestly express this belief as to what the conucil had done and would do- in regard to opening the street. If the appellee, acting on the information thus given, in relation to a matter of which- he could have easily learned- as much as Ward and Dills knew on the subject, was disappointed, as probably they were also, as to the future action of the council, we do not see that this disappointment is a sufficient ground for canceling his contract of purchase, especially after his acceptance of a conveyance of the- lot.

/. *T. Ward, for appellant.*

*Cleary, West, for appellees.*

As to the alleged breach of a promise of Dills to donate to the city twenty feet of ground for Wilson Avenue, set up in an amended answer, offered but not filed, we deem it sufficient to say that if the facts therein alleged are true, still as that ground was sold at the same time that the appellee purchased; and as we must infer, before he accepted the deed to him, it must be presumed that he entered into his contract with knowledge of the other sale and waiving any cause of objection-he may have had- to it. It ought not, therefore, now to be made a cause for rescinding the appellee’s contract of purchase.

We are of the opinion that the court erred in rescinding the contract.

Wherefore, the1 judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded with instructions to render a judgment for the plaintiff conformable to this opinion.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 7

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 389

[Report No. 108–13] 

To authorize the use of certain grant funds to establish an information 

clearinghouse that provides information to increase public access to 

defibrillation in schools. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2003

Mr. SHIMKUS (for himself, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. DEUTSCH, Mr. KIRK, Mr. RUSH, 

and Mr. PICKERING) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

FEBRUARY 13, 2003

Additional sponsors: Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. FROST, Mr. COSTELLO, and Mr. 

LAHOOD

FEBRUARY 13, 2003

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL

To authorize the use of certain grant funds to establish 

an information clearinghouse that provides information 

to increase public access to defibrillation in schools.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 389 RH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Automatic 

3 Defibrillation in Adam’s Memory Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE ACT. 

5 Subsection (c) of section 312 of the Public Health 

6 Service Act (42 U.S.C. 244), as amended by Public Law 

7 107–188, is amended—

8 (1) at the end of paragraph (5), by striking 

9 ‘‘and’’; 

10 (2) by redesignating paragraph (6) as para11 graph (7); and 

12 (3) by inserting after paragraph (5) the fol13 lowing: 

14 ‘‘(6) establish an information clearinghouse that 

15 provides information to increase public access to 

16 defibrillation in schools; and’’. 

Union Calendar No. 7

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 389

[Report No. 108–13] 

A BILL

To authorize the use of certain grant funds to esdefibrillation in schools. vides information to increase public access to tablish an information clearinghouse that proFEBRUARY 13, 2003

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

April 22, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00054

- CR

Marcus Anthony ROBINSON

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR0413

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The court reporter has filed a second notification of late reporter’s record, requesting an

extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request and ORDER her to file

the reporter’s record on or before May 7, 2014.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 22nd day of April, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00442

- CR

M AXWELL P OLIDOR

, J R

., Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 16th District

Court

of Denton County (F15

- 1205

- 16)

August 8, 2019

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGM ENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
Automation of a SlitRheometer for SANS

Derek Nie, Thomas S. Wootton High School, Class of 2019

Mentors: Katie Weigandt, Jeffery Krzywon, Javen Weston
Small Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS)

Neutron Source Sample

Incident Beam

Detector

https://www.scienceinschool.org/2012/issue25/soap
Flow and Complex Fluids

Quiescent Flow

Viscosity

Shear Rate

Viscosity

Shear Rate

Shear

Thinning

Shear

Thinning

Shear

Thickening
Rotating Cylinder Rheometer Microfluidic Slit Rheometer

https://www.valleyvet.com/ct_detail.html?pgguid=e5 https://stock.adobe.com/search?k=spray

0f088f-f794-4a52-970b-d0676b9d3037
42.5 inches

35 inches

37 inches

Reservoir

Pump

Entering 

Cell

Receiving 

from Cell
High Pressure Sensor

Low Pressure Sensor
PyDAQmx pymodbus gclib

Conclusion

Communication with pump, valves, and pressure sensors

Utilizing volume dispensed data to turn valves

Utilizing pressure values to turn valves

• GitHub: https://git.ncnr.nist.gov/jkrzywon/microrheosans
Acknowledgements

• CHRNS

• SHIP (Julie Borchers, Joe Dura, Yamali Hernandez)

• fellow SHIP students

• all SHIP mentors
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 27, 2010

d0920 

# Order

September 27, 2010

140051(47)

RANDY ALDERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140051 COA: 285744 Oakland CC: 2007-082233-NO J.C. DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITIES, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for r econsideration of this Court’s April 30, 2010 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

K ELLY 

## , C.J., would grant the motion for reconsideration.