alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 25, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 25, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20D0104. MONICA BARRONTON v. MARK BUTLER, COMMISSIONER OF 

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2019CV02744
Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SI Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
period covered by this Report.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Rheo A. BrouillardRheo A. Brouillard President and Chief Executive
Officer September 4, 2009By:

/s/ Brian J. HullBrian J. Hull Executive Vice President, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer September 4, 2009
Exhibit 31.2

Certification

I,
James A. Peers, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of GFI Group Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
March 2, 2009

/s/ JAMES A. PEERS James A. Peers Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION

Emoji Company GmbH,

Plaintiff,

v.

SCHEDULE “A”

Defendant.

Civil Action No.: 20-cv-4874 

Response to the Plaintiff's complaint

The defendant requests to suspend the trial of this case and release the defendant's 

account. The reasons are as follows:

1. plaintiff has no adequate evidence to prove defendant infringed his emoji 

trademark, the following picture is the plaintiff's unique evidence. As we can see 

below, defendant just used "emoji" to describe his product, The theme of this cartoon 

image corresponds to the "emoji", "emoji" is not a word originally created by the 

right holder, it belongs to the common name in the expression field like "Emoticons", 

and it is being used by thousands of Internet users. The defendant's action complies 

with the 15 U.S.C. § 1115(b) on fair use.

2. The plaintiff failed to serve legal documents in accordance with due legal 

procedures. Until now, defendant does not receive relevant legal documents such as 

summons, temporary injunction order, preliminary injunction order, etc. Plaintiff let 

defendant himself see on pacer, however, the defendant, as a Chinese seller instead of 

a lawyer in the United States, was unable to register an account on the pacer, so he 

could not log in to see the case information, the defendant does not even know the 

stage of development of the case. Defendant has been working to contact plaintiff to 

resolve the case, but the plaintiff did not respond to the defendant for a long time on 

the grounds of servers' malfunction or other reasons.

3. Therefore. Given that plaintiff did not provide adequate evidence or follow due 

process of serve of legal process, defendant implore the court to dismiss the 

plaintiff’s claim and release the defendant's account.

DATED: October 6, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

FILED

10/8/2020

THOMAS G. BRUTON CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

TL

Case: 1:20-cv-04874 Document #: 33 Filed: 10/08/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:2784
Jesun

Guangdong Yilong Law Firm

Room 1403, Wanhui Building, Longgang Street, 

Longgang District,Shenzhen,Guangdong,China

+86-131-2045-1811

iplawyer01@foxmail.com

AGENT FOR DEFENDANT

Case: 1:20-cv-04874 Document #: 33 Filed: 10/08/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:2785
SCHEDULE “A”

Seller Name Seller Origin Company 

or individual

Address

SAQIMA A159YMHZNAXJLK

Shen Zhen 

shi hui yang 

Jian she gong 

cheng you 

xian gong si

Long gang 

qu long 

cheng jie 

dao shang 

Jing she qu 

Long Cheng 

zhong lu

108 hao 

zheng zhong 

shi dai da 

Sha 807-8

Shen zhen 

shi Guang 

Dong

Case: 1:20-cv-04874 Document #: 33 Filed: 10/08/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:2786
EXHIBIT 21



SUBSIDIARIES



The companies listed below are the primary subsidiaries of the Corporation. The financial data for these subsidiaries comprised the Corporations
consolidated financial statements.



|                                            |  |                      
|------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|Name of Company                             |  | OrganizedUnderLaws of
|Domestic:                                   |  |                      
|                                            | 
|Symmetry Medical USA Inc.                   |  | Delaware             
|Symmetry Medical International Inc.         |  | Delaware             
|Mettis Group Inc.                           |  | Delaware             
|Ultrexx, Inc. (a)                           |  | Indiana              
|Jet Engineering, Inc. (a)                   |  | Michigan             
|                                            | 
|International:                              |  |                      
|                                            | 
|Othy Limited                                |  | England              
|Poly-Vac France S.A.R.L.                    |  | France               
|Poly-Vac S.A.                               |  | France               
|Mettis (UK) Limited (a)                     |  | England              
|Thornton Precision Components Limited (a)   |  | England              
|Medicast Limited                            |  | England              
|Arthur Robinson & Sons (Willenhall) Limited |  | England              

---

|(a) | Accounts for material revenues.
|--- | -------------------------------
No. 15,322.

#### Kedy et al. *v.*Kramer et al.

Married *Woman.*— Liability *of.*— Note *and Mortgage.*— A married woman who buys property may execute a note and may, jointly with her husband, execute a mortgage to secure the purchase-money, and it is not material whether she purchases for herself alone or for herself and husband. If she acquires a beneficial ownership in the land purchased she receives a consideration for her contract, and is a principal and not a surety.

*479Filed Nov. 6, 1891.

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

*J. V,*Kent, for appellants.

*H. G. Morrison*and *M. Morrison,*for appellees.

Elliott, J. —

The appellee sued upon a note and mortgage executed *by*William U. Kedy and Meda Kedy to Oliver Galvin, and by Galvin assigned to the appellee.

The answers of the appellants were in confession and avoidance, and hence admitted the material allegation of the complaint that the note and mortgage were assigned to the appellee. As this allegation was admitted, the appellants can not successfully insist that there is a failure of evidence,, because none was offered to prove the assignment.

A married woman who buys property may execute a note and may, jointly with her husband, execute a mortgage to secure the purchase-money, and it is not material whether she purchases for herself alone or for herself and her husband. *Miller*v. *Shields,*124 Ind. 166; *Berridge*v. *Banks,*125 Ind. 561; *Young*v. *McFadden,*125 Ind. 254. If she acquires a beneficial ownership in the land purchased she receives a consideration for her contract, and is a principal,, not a surety. Such a contract as that of the purchase of land where there is one deed conveying to a wife and her husband jointly, can not be split into fragments to the prejudice of the vendor, but, as to him, all the purchasers are principals, and the promise to pay indivisible. Where the vendor conveys to the wife, naming her as sole grantee, it is even more clear that she can not be heard to aver that the consideration did not move to her.

We have not examined the questions of appellate practice discussed by appellees’ counsel with care, but from such an examination as we have given them we are inclined to think, the points well made.

Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.0

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Abington Community Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert W. White, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Jack J.
Sandoski, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ Robert W. White
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Robert W. White
                                                Chairman, President and
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                March 27, 2006


                                                /s/ Jack J. Sandoski
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Jack J. Sandoski
                                                Senior Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                March 27, 2006


A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO ABINGTON COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC. AND
WILL BE RETAINED BY ABINGTON COMMUNITY BANCORP, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

| May 11, 2006   | By:    | /s/            Harry N. Stout |   |
|----------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| (Date)

  |   |  Harry N. Stout

 President

  

                      |   |
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16D0384. JOHN GALCZYNSKI v. LAURA MACDONALD et al.

A16D0397. IN THE INTEREST OF: L. G. AND H. G., CHILDREN.

On March 18, 2016, the trial court entered a Final Dependency Order, finding

H. G. and L. G. dependent and awarding temporary custody to Laura McDonald, the

children’s maternal grandmother. John Galczynski, the father, filed a motion for

reconsideration, which the trial court denied. The father subsequently filed an

application for discretionary appeal, docketed as Case No. A16D0384, on May 18,

2016. Both John Galczynski and AmyBarnes, the mother, filed a joint application for

discretionary appeal from the same order, docketed as Case No. A16D0397, on May

23, 2016. We lack jurisdiction.

Dependency rulings are generally directlyappealable.

1 Ordinarily,when a party

applies for discretionary review of a directly appealable order, we grant the

application under OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). To fall within this general rule, however, the

application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order or judgment to be

appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d); Hill v State, 204 Ga. App. 582, 583 (420 SE2d

1 See In the Interest of J. P., 267 Ga. 492, 492-493 (480 SE2d 8) (1997)

(deprivation/dependency cases do not fall within the purview of OCGA § 5-6-35 (a)

(2) and therefore are directly appealable). This is especially true where, as here, the

dependency order includes a child custody ruling. See In the Interest of S. J., 270 Ga.

App. 598, 607 (1) (a) (607 SE2d 225) (2004) (order within a deprivation/dependency

proceeding deciding temporary custody of the child is a “final order” within the

meaning of OCGA § 5-6- 34 (a) (1), from which a direct appeal lies).

 

June 07, 2016
393) (1992). Here, the father’s application for discretionary appeal wasfiled 61 days

after the court’s March 18 final order. Although the father sought reconsideration of

the court's final dependency order, the denial of a motion for reconsideration is not

appealable in its own right. See Bell v. Cohran, 244 Ga. App. 510, 511 (536 SE2d

187) (2000). And the filing of such a motion does not extend the time for appealing

the underlying judgment – here, the final dependency order. See Cheeley-Towns v.

Rapid Group, Inc., 212 Ga. App. 183 (1) (441 SE2d 452) (1994). In addition, the

parents’ joint application was filed 66 days after the March 18 final order.

Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider these untimely applications, which are

hereby DISMISSED.

 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

06/07/2016
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant toSection 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Joseph J. Kwederis,certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Pliant Corporation;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)           Disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)           All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November 14, 2006 |                       |
|-------------------------|----------------------------|
|                    |                       |
|                    |                       |
|                    | /s/ Joseph J. Kwederis     |
|                    | Joseph J.  Kwederis        |
|                    | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

----
---

---

EXHIBIT 15.(a).1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File
No. 333-120559) pertaining to the Employees Stock Option Plan of Syneron Medical Ltd. of
our report dated March 24, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Syneron Medical Ltd. and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 2008.

|               |                                 
|-------------- | --------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|Haifa, Israel  | /s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
|March 24, 2009 | KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER    
|               | A Member of Ernst & Young Global



---

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

          - [DR.5B711.IA000815]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Tribal-State Class III Gaming Compact taking effect.

# SUMMARY:

This notice publishes the Class III Gaming Compact between the Karuk Tribe and the State of California taking effect.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         November 19, 2014.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary—Policy and Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701*et seq.,*                     the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. The Compact between the State of California and the Karuk Tribe allows for one gaming facility and authorizes the Tribe to operate up to                           ( print page 68911)                        1500 gaming devices, any banking or percentage card games, and any devices or games authorized under State law to the State lottery. The Tribe will make revenue sharing payments for operating more than 350 gaming devices. Finally, the term of the compact is until December 31, 2034. The Secretary took no action on the Compact within 45 days of its submission by the Tribe and the State. Therefore, the compact is considered to have been approved, but only to the extent that the Compact is consistent with IGRA.                     *See*25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(8)(C).                

Dated: November 12, 2014.

Kevin K. Washburn,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2014-27377 Filed 11-18-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-4N-P