alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 400

To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Transportation to require automobile manufacturers to provide automatic door 

locks and interior-opening trunk locks on new passenger cars manufactured after 2005. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2003

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Transportation to require automobile manufacturers to provide automatic door locks and interior-opening trunk locks on new passenger cars manufactured 

after 2005.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Auto Safety Assurance 

5 Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 400 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ANTICARJACKING AUTOMOBILE SAFETY LOCKS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title 49 of the United States 

3 Code is amended by inserting after section 30127 the fol4 lowing new section: 

5 ‘‘§ 30128. Occupant safety locks 

6 ‘‘Not later than January 1, 2004, the Secretary of 

7 Transportation shall prescribe under this chapter an 

8 amendment to Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 

9 206 (49 C.F.R. 571.206) issued under the National Traf10 fic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966. The amendment 

11 shall require that all passenger cars (as such term is de12 fined in section 30127(a)(3)) manufactured after Decem13 ber 31, 2005, shall be fitted with—

14 ‘‘(1) equipment that automatically locks the 

15 doors of the vehicle when—

16 ‘‘(A) the vehicle transmission is engaged; 

17 or 

18 ‘‘(B) the vehicle reaches a specified rate of 

19 speed; and 

20 ‘‘(2) vehicle trunk lock mechanisms that permit 

21 unlatching from inside the trunk.’’. 

22 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

23 at the beginning of subtitle IV of title 49, United States 
3

•HR 400 IH 

1 Code, is amended by adding after the item related to sec2 tion 30127 the following new item:

‘‘30128. Occupant safety locks.’’.

Æ
#### W. M. Peak *v.*R. B. Williams.

Highways — Report of Viewers — What Should Show.

Viewers, in making their report, should show the convenience and inconvenience which, will result to individuals as well as to the public in the opening, discontinuance or altering of a public road.

Highways — Report of Viewers — What Should Show.

Where viewers, in their report, show that the closing of the road would be of some disadvantage to a named person, they should show in their report whether or not the discontinuance of the road would cut him off from a public highway, or increase the distance he would have to travel to reach a highway, or state the facts upon which they based their opinion that he would be subjected to inconvenience by the closing of the road.

APPEAL FROM TRIMBLE CIRCUIT COURT.

January 31, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay :

The county court should have sustained the exceptions filed to the report of the viewers. It was their duty to report the conveniences and inconveniences, which would result as well to individuals as to the public, from the opening, alteration or discontinuance of the public road. Inasmuch as. they seemed to think that closing the old road might be some little disadvantage to Williams, and *415were unable to state definitely the extent of the inconvenience to which he would thereby be subjected, they should have reported whether or not the discontinuance of such road would cut him' off from a public highway, or increase the distance he would be compelled to travel in leaving and returning to his home, or at least give the facts upon which they based the opinion that he might be subjected to inconvenience. As the report stands it was impossible for the county court to reach any conclusion as to this matter without resort to evidence outside the record.

*Winslow, for .appellant.*

*DeHaven, for appellee.*

’ The circuit court properly sustained the exceptions and set aside the judgment of the county court authorizing the proposed change.

The order of the county court was final. The right of appellant to have the change was established, and the exercise of the right was merely postponed till he should comply with the conditions annexed. Williams could offer no further resistance in the county court, hence he had the right to appeal. He had a direct interest in the question and could prosecute the appeal, although the change in the road was wholly on the lands of Peak.

As the order of the circuit court quashing the report of the viewers renders it necessary that the proceeding shall be commenced *de novo,*the viewers, being now *functus oMcio,*it was not necessary that the case should have been remanded to the county court.

Judgment *affirmed.*
No. 87-6434.

#### Ray *v.*Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Alex. Adams *v.*Wm. Able.

Equity — Remedy at Law.

No reason is given wby appellee did not file certified copies of his judgments, executions and returns in the Circuit Clerk’s office and sue out execution thereon under which he might have levied on and sold the land. His legal remedy being complete he had no right to tax appellant with the cost of a proceeding in equity.

APPEAL FROM DAVIESS CIRCUIT COURT.

December 13, 1872.

*Owens & Ellis, for appellant.*

*Weir, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

It appears from, appellee’s petition that appellant owned the land adjudged to be sold, and that he had occupied and possessed it for twenty years prior to the institution of this suit.

Such being the case, his title was prima facie as perfect as though he held by regular conveyance.

No reason is given why appellee did not file certified copies of his judgments, executions and returns in. the circuit clerk’s office and sue out executions thereon. Under such executions he might have levied om and sold the land.

His legal remedy being complete he had no right to tax appellant with the costs of a proceeding in equity.

Judgment reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to dismiss appellee’s petition, unless by amendment he shows some right to ask assistance from the chancellor.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8

               TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH LARRY DALESANDRO
                              EFFECTIVE MAY 3, 2002

      Should Lannett terminate your employment other than "for cause" (as
defined below), you will be eligible for severance compensation in an amount to
be determined by Lannett, but not less than six (6) months of your base salary
at the time of termination. You will also be eligible to continue your
participation in the Company's medical benefit plans for six (6) months, at no
cost to you. For purposes hereof, "for cause" is defined to include engaging in
unethical business practices or conduct which creates a conflict of interest,
fraud, malfeasance, criminal behavior, and willful conduct in violation of
Lannett's Non-Harassment Policy or Corporate Handbook. If the Company is sold or
a majority of the Company's ANDAs (Abbreviated New Drug Applications) are sold
during your employment, and the Company or new organization terminates your
employment, you will be eligible for severance compensation in an amount equal
to one year of your current base salary at the time of termination. In this
scenario, you will also be eligible to continue your participation in the
Company's medical benefit plans, at no cost to you, for up to one year.
Additionally, all option grants issued to you, whether they are vested or
unvested, will become immediately vested for your benefit. If the Company is
sold during your employment, and the organization that takes control of the
Board of Directors desires to continue your employment with the same assignment
and place of business, regardless of whether you remain with the buying
organization or not, you will be paid an amount equal to six months of your then
current base salary at the time of the sale transaction for the Company.

      It is understood that these benefit terms are not being offered for a
definite period of time and that either you or the Company may terminate the
employment relationship at any time and for any reason without prior notice.
Nothing in this letter to you of compensation, stock options or benefits should
be interpreted as creating anything other than an at-will employment
relationship. In addition, the Company reserves the right to periodically review
the salary, bonus and benefits it offers to you and to adjust them from time to
time in its sole discretion but in no case will the salary be adjusted below
your current base salary.
II 

Calendar No. 567 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3939 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 12, 2004 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

JUNE 7, 2004 

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 14–24 Abbott Road in Fair Lawn, New 

Jersey, as the ‘‘Mary Ann Collura Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 14–24 Abbott Road in Fair Lawn, New Jersey, 

6 and known as the Fair Lawn Main Post Office, shall be 

7 known and designated as the ‘‘Mary Ann Collura Post Of8 fice Building’’. 
2 

•HR 3939 RS 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘Mary Ann Collura Post Office Building’’. 

Calendar No. 567 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3939 

AN ACT 

To redesignate the facility of the United States 

Collura Post Office Building’’. Fair Lawn, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Mary Ann Postal Service located at 14–24 Abbott Road in 

JUNE 7, 2004 

Reported without amendment
A

A

A

A

A

A

A A A

A A A

A A A

A

Y W A

A A A

W

W

Y Y W

Y A

Y A Y A

A Y A A

Case: 1:20-cv-04985 Document #: 82 Filed: 07/22/21 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:889
A Y W

A

W

w

A

W Y

Y

w

W Y Y

W

A A

Y A

Y

A A

A

A Y

w

A A

w

A Y

Case: 1:20-cv-04985 Document #: 82 Filed: 07/22/21 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:890
w

A

W

A w

A Y W

w w

w w

A

A

A w

Y

Y

A

A Y

Y w w

w w A w

w w w w

w

A Y

Case: 1:20-cv-04985 Document #: 82 Filed: 07/22/21 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:891
A W w

A W

A

A w

A Y

A w W Y

A Y

A

Y Y

A Y

Case: 1:20-cv-04985 Document #: 82 Filed: 07/22/21 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:892
----

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |                   |                      |
|------------------------------------|------------------------|---------------------------|
|                               | STUDIO ONE MEDIA, INC. |
|                               |                   |                      |
| Date:   January 26, 2010 | By:          | /s/  Preston J. Shea |
|                               | Preston J. Shea        |
|                               | President              |

|                               |                                                 |                          |
|------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                               | STUDIO ONE MEDIA, INC.                               |
|                               |                                                 |                          |
| Date:   January 26, 2010 | By:                                        | /s/  Kenneth R. Pinckard |
|                               | Kenneth R. Pinckard                                  |
|                               | Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer |

----
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 6713

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
JOSHUA JULIUS COLE , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5:09

- cr - 00327

- D

- 1 )

Submitted : August 31, 2021 Decided: January 11, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and MOTZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Joshua Julius Cole , Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Lucy Partain Brown, As sistant U nited S tates Attorney , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 20-6713 Doc: 10 Filed: 01/11/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Joshua Julius Cole appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, § 404(b), 132 Stat. 5194, 5222. Having reviewed the record , we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Cole’s motion. See Unite d States v. Jackson , 952 F.3d 492, 497, 502 (4th Cir. 2020) (stating standard of review) . Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argum ent would not aid the decisional

process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 20-6713 Doc: 10 Filed: 01/11/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cr−00585

Honorable Jorge L. Alonso

Jacob Mathley

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, December 1, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso as to Jacob Mathley (1):

Telephonic status hearing held and continued to 2/3/21 at 2:00 p.m. For the reasons stated

on the record, Defendant's motion for discovery and inspection [38] is denied as moot

without prejudice. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this

hearing. The call−in number is 888−808−6929 and the access code is 4911854. Counsel

of record will receive an email 30 minutes prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with

instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of

the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court

proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of

court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future

hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. In the interest of justice

and for the reasons stated on the record, time is hereby excluded to 2/3/21 pursuant to the

provisions of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 USC § 3161(h)(7)(A)(B) and 18 USC § 3161

(h)(1)(D). Notice mailed by judge's staff (lf, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cr-00585 Document #: 41 Filed: 12/01/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:90
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>                                                           5 

        
<S>                                                       <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                  12-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         FEB-28-1998 
<PERIOD-START>                                            MAR-01-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                                              FEB-28-1998 
<CASH>                                                              0 
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    0 
<PP&E>                                                              0 
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                      0 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         768,912 
<BONDS>                                                             0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                                         0 
<COMMON>                                                       50,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                  1,141,299
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                (768,912)
<SALES>                                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    0 
<CGS>                                                               0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                                        0      
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0 

         

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1: Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1850 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report  of  South  Texas  Oil  Company  (the
"Company") on Form  10-KSB  for the year ending  December 31, 2007  as  filed
with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, J. Scott Zimmerman, President, CEO and Director of the Company,
certify,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant   to
Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and that to  the best of  the
undersigned's knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in  all
material respects, the financial condition and result of  operations  of  the
Company.

                                  /s/ J. Scott Zimmerman
                                  ----------------------
                                  J, Scott Zimmerman,
                                  President, CEO and Director
Date: April 15, 2008
The members of the Evaluation Stee

Committee are, Tom Hopper (FBI) 

Norman B. Nill (Mitre Corporation) Torsten Torsten Meister (CTO Meister (CTO of TBS) 

Laurence Hassebrook (University of KenJin Chu Wu (NIST)
EXHIBIT31.1

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

 

I, Geoffrey S. M. Hedrick, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofInnovative Solutions and Support, Inc.

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)              All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

 
| By:        | /s/ GEOFFREY S. M. HEDRICK |
|----------------------|----------------------------|
| Date: April 29, 2005 | GEOFFREY S. M. HEDRICK     |
|                 | CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND  |
|                 | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER    |

 

 

----

----