1 

NEPA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Temple Hall Addition & Renovation Project

Missouri State University 

Springfield, Missouri 

March 2023

HRSA Project CE1HS47040 

NIST Project 60NANB23D013
2 

Introduction

The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the Department of Health and

Human Services (HHS) provides funding through the FY 2022 Consolidated Appropriations Act

(P.L. 117-103) for congressionally directed spending projects that relate to the construction and 

renovation (including equipment} of health care and other facilities. This proposed activity will be 

supported through funding awarded by HRSA.

Missouri State University (MSU) has applied for this HRSA award. MSU proposes to use the

HRSA funding to construct a 4-story addition onto an existing University building, as well as 

renovation of selected areas within the existing building footprint. Temple Hall is an existing 

building located at the corner of Briggs Street and John Q. Hammons Parkway on the campus of 

Missouri State University in Springfield, Missouri. The addition to the building will be located at 

the northeast building corner. The property is owned by Missouri State University. The building 

addition is planned to be four floors and a basement approximately 170 feet x 86 feet. Each floor 

will be approximately 15,000 square feet. There will also be some limited work done to the

existing portions of Temple Hall as part of the construction scope of work.

This Environmental Assessment (EA) has been prepared in accordance with the National 

Environmental Policy Act, the Council on Environmental Quality regulations for implementing 

NEPA (40 CFR Parts 1500 through 1508) and the HHS General Administration Manual Part 30

Environmental Protection (February 25, 2000) to determine if the proposed Temple Hall

Addition will have a significant impact on the quality of the human environment.

Purpose and Need

The purpose of the project is to consolidate department activities that are not currently located 

in Temple Hall and to provide additional, state of the art teaching and research laboratories. The

spaces will include teaching and research labs, support space, offices, student study and 

collaboration areas, additional restrooms, and departmental offices.

This project will benefit the University, including students, staff, and faculty, and the greater 

Springfield community. The College of Natural and Applied Sciences houses academic and

research programs in health and life sciences, such as biology, chemistry, biochemistry, physics, 

astronomy, materials science, geography, geology, mathematics, computer science and related 

fields. MSU's enrollment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields 

have more than doubled in the last 50 years. Despite this growth, substantial portions of MSU's 

original STEM, health and life-science facilities have remained mostly unaltered for decades. 

These facilities no longer meet modern scientific and technological needs for workforce training, 

education, and research.

Spaces for student success and community partner offices will also be included. The College of 

Natural and Applied Sciences Master Plan 

(https://architect.missouristate.edu/OurVision/Springfield/CNASMasterPlan.pdf) (Sept 2020) provided 

documentation of the areas that the existing facility was lacking adequate space for current 

teaching needs and identified the building addition which address these deficiencies.
3 

Alternatives

No Action

A 'No Action' alternative would prevent any expansion of the sciences programs, leaving the 

College unable to meet the demand for modern teaching spaces, and would result in increasing 

operational costs to operate older failing building systems. Over time this is not a sustainable

option.

Alternatives to the Proposed Project Evaluated but not Considered for Further Review

Various alternatives to the current site selection were considered during the Master Plan

process. (see Appendix A Site Analysis from Master Plan). A 'New Building' alternative was

considered to meet the current programming needs but it would have either required the 

demolition of the existing building or construction on existing open space. Demolition would

create a significant disruption and discontinuance of current science programs for the 

duration of the work. The two sites considered for new construction were determined to be

cost prohibitive and separated the various departments which is counter to the college's goal

for more collaboration. There were also two addition locations considered, one on the south

was rejected due to the amount of infrastructure sub-surface which would require relocation 

and the final determination on the northeast corner of the building.

Proposed Action

This proposed Temple Hall building addition with renovation takes advantage of a structurallysound existing building and an open space adjacent to the building that will provide needed 

space to consolidate laboratory spaces and improve the building's operational performance. The 

undertaking consists of the construction of an addition to the northeast corner of Temple Hall 

(910 S. John Q. Hammons Parkway), to provide additional laboratory, office, and support space 

in the existing science building. This addition will obscure the original east entrance and require 

demolition of portions of the north and east facades and removal of the original landscape

features at the northeast corner of the building.

This is the most cost- and time-effective alternative to meet the needs of students, the

University, and the state to provide modern science education.

The existing building will remain functional during the demolition and construction of the new addition. 

Occupants immediately adjacent to the areas of demolition have been relocated and the auditoriums 

have been removed from scheduling until the addition will be occupied. The transitions between the 

existing building and new addition will be completely sealed with water/sound proof partitions until the 

work to transition into the new addition has been completed. The work area will be isolated from the 

walking mall with fencing and inaccessible drives to prevent impact on the campus community.

Existing Conditions

The proposed project site is on the northwest corner of the existing Temple Hall, and currently

consists of a concrete paved open space with ground-level planters and a small lawn area.

Temple Hall itself is in the south-central portion of the Missouri State University campus.

Most of the University's approximately 225-acre campus extends to the north of the site. (See
4 

Appendix B for Site figures, including a site location map and aerial photo outlining the project

area.) Most of the area being utilized for the addition of the building addition has been under

concrete pavement since the original construction of Temple Hall in 1971, so no significant

change to the volume of surface under pavement is anticipated.

The project property is on the southeastern portion of the 35.7-acre parcel 1324413018 as 

recorded by the Greene County Assessor's office. The Assessor's records show the property as

being owned by the Board of Governors of Missouri State University.

The project site is situated on the southern portion of a 225-acre urban college campus. 

Surrounding the campus is a historically residential and light commercial area of central 

Springfield, Missouri.

Adjacent and surrounding properties are as follows:

• Along the southern edge of the subject site is a vacated city street remnant: Briggs Street.

South of that is MSU parking lot #4, and south of Lot #4 is Grand Street, a 4-lane east west 

roadway;

• To the west is John Q. Hammons Parkway and additional paved University parking;

• North of the subject site are campus features associated with the west mall, including

sidewalks, a brick plaza area, grass lawn areas with outdoor tables/seating, and a large

fountain. Directly north of the mall area is Meyer Library; and

• To the east is Plaster Stadium, the University's football stadium with concrete grandstand

seating on the east and west sides. National Avenue, a major north-south traffic artery

(average daily traffic approximately 35,500), is immediately east of the project site.

Several commercial/office facilities are located along the east side of National, with the

Roundtree neighborhood occupying the area farther east.

The subject property, like much of the MSU campus, consisted primarily of single-family 

residences through the 1960s. A Sanborn Fire Insurance map dated 1933 shows residential 

properties populating the area on both sides of Grand Street (Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from

Springfield, Greene County, Missouri. Sanborn Map Company, - Jan 1950. Map.

https://www.loc.gov/item/sanborn04881_008/). A filling station with three aboveground tanks is 

shown on the southwest corner of Grand and National. This location is currently a large

stormwater detention basin. No historic industrial facilities were present in the immediate area 

of the site.

On the Springfield, Missouri 7.5 Minute Topographic Quadrangle map (United States Survey, 

1996), the site is located on the southern edge of the southeast corner of Section 24, Township 

29 North, Range 22 West, at an elevation of approximately 1,320 feet above mean sea level. Site 

location coordinates are Latitude 37° 11' 53” N - Longitude 93° 16' 51" W. 

The site is located in the northern portion of the Fassnight Creek watershed. The surface 

topography at the site is a gentle slope toward the south and east. Storm water drainage at the

site is to the south and east, eventually into a university-owned stormwater detention basin

southwest of the intersection of National Ave. and Grand St. The detention basin discharges to
5 

Fassnight Creek, located approximately 0.7 miles south of the site. Fassnight Creek flows west 

and south approximately 5 miles to Wilsons Creek, a tributary of the James River.

The city of Springfield sits on the Springfield Plateau section of the Ozarks Highlands 

physiographic province, which is underlain by essentially horizontal Ordovician-age limestone, 

sandstone, and dolo- stone bedrock. The southwest Missouri region is characterized by karst 

geology, in which features like caves, springs, and sinkholes are common. Examples of these 

features are present in Springfield, but none of these features have been identified on the subject 

site. Depth to limestone bedrock in the immediate area of the site typically ranges from eight to 

15 feet below ground surface (bgs). Local soils are typically characterized by a high clay content

resulting from the weathering of the limestone bedrock.

Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences

Shorelines, Beaches and Dunes, Estuary, Wetlands and Floodplains

A review of the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory map of the area, 

available online at http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html confirmed that wetland

areas are not located on or in the vicinity of the site.

According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Flood Insurance Rate Map,

the site is not located within a flood zone (Community-Panel Number 29077 C0334E, dated 

December 17, 2010). A copy of the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map showing the site location is

included with other site figures in Appendix B.

There are no shoreline, beach and dune, or estuary properties within or near the subject

property.

No Action Alternative

Under the No Action alternative, the Project site would remain in its current hydrological state.

No impact to wetlands, floodplains, or waterways would occur under this alternative.

Proposed Temple Hall Addition

No evidence of potential jurisdictional waters, including wetlands or floodplains, were found

on the Project site. Under the proposed Project, the Project site would be graded, and a 

building addition would be constructed. No impacts to jurisdictional waters, including wetlands,

would occur under the proposed Project.

Vegetation and Wildlife Resources

Vegetation and wildlife resources associated with this site were determined through 

assessment of information available for wilderness areas, wildlife preserves, and 

threatened/endangered species.

Wilderness Areas

The National Wilderness Preservation System {NWPS, http://www.wilderness.net/nwps) was
6 

reviewed to determine the proximity of officially designated wilderness areas. The NWPS is 

comprised of lands designated as wilderness areas by the United States Forest Service (USFS),

United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), United States Bureau of Land Management 

(BLM), and the National Park Service (NPS).

There are currently eight wilderness areas located in the State of Missouri. These eight 

wilderness areas (Paddy Creek, Bell Mountain, Rockpile Mountain, Mingo, Irish, Devils 

Backbone, Hercules-Glades, and Piney Creek) are all found in the southern part of the state; four 

of them are located along the southern border of the state. According to the NWPS information 

reviewed, the site is not located in a designated wilderness area.

Designated wilderness areas are also delineated on USGS 7.5-minute series topographic 

quadrangle maps. A review of the USGS Springfield Quadrangle map determined that the site is

not located within a designated wilderness area. In addition, a review of the Delorme Missouri 

Atlas & Gazetteer, 1998 edition, did not indicate the presence of a designated wilderness area 

in the site vicinity.

Wildlife Preserves

There are eight designated National Wildlife Refuges (NWRs) in the State of Missouri, including

the Squaw Creek NWR, the Great River NWR, the Swan Lake NWR, the Clarence Canyon NWR,

the Big Muddy NWR, the Pilot Knob NWR, the Mingo NWR, and the Ozark Cavefish NWR.

The site is located in Springfield. The nearest NWR to the site is the Ozark Cavefish NWR, which

is located in Lawrence County approximately 20 miles west of Springfield. Therefore, the site is 

not located within or adjacent to an officially designated wildlife preserve.

Officially designated wildlife preserves are also delineated on USGS 7.5-minute series 

topographic quadrangle maps. Review of the USGS Springfield Quadrangle map determined that 

the site is not located within a designated wildlife preserve. Additionally, a review of the Delorme 

Missouri Atlas & Gazetteer, 1998 edition, did not indicate the presence of a designated wildlife 

preserve in the site vicinity.

Listed/Proposed Threatened/Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitats

In accordance with requirements in Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973 (16

U.S.C. §§ 1536) to determine potential impacts to threatened or endangered species, a Heritage 

Review was requested through the Missouri Department of Conservation's (MDOC) website 

(https://naturalheritagereview.mdc.mo.gov). This Heritage Review process includes information

from both state (MDOC) and federal (USFWS) databases.

No Action Alternative

Under the No Action alternative, the Project site would remain in its current state. No impact to 

vegetation, habitat, or wildlife resources would occur under this alternative.

Proposed Temple Hall Addition

No protected species or restricted habitats were identified at the specific project site. The MDOC 
7 

Heritage Review noted the site is within the known range of Indiana and Northern long eared

bats, as well as the Missouri Bladderpod. The site is also located within the recharge area of the

Ozark Cavefish.

Best management practices are recommended to minimize any negative impacts of construction.

The project will primarily occur on existing paved areas; no significant vegetation removal is 

anticipated. Best Management Practices (BMPs) prescribed by the City of

Springfield Environmental Services BMP manual

(https:/ /www.springfieldmo.gov/DocumentCenter/View/33362/BMP-Manual-?bidld=) will be

utilized as appropriate during project construction.

A copy of the Heritage Review document (dated December 12, 2022) is included in Appendix C.

Land Use and Zoning

According to the online city of Springfield zoning map, the site is currently zoned as GI 

(Government/Institutional). (http:/ /maps.springfieldmo.gov/zoning/).

No Action Alternative

Under the No Action alternative, the Project site would remain in its current land use.

Therefore, no land use or zoning would occur under this alternative.

Proposed Temple Hall Addition

The proposed Temple Hall Addition is consistent with local land use and zoning requirements, as 

well as associated MSU planning documents for the campus.

Hazardous or Toxic Substances/ Solid Waste Management

Chemical waste generated in Temple Hall laboratories is managed through the University's 

environmental management program to ensure proper handling and disposal. This program is 

operated in compliance with applicable US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Missouri 

Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) regulations. Any waste generated in laboratories in 

the Temple Hall addition will be managed under the same program.

Wastes generated during construction will consist of solid construction materials (wood,

metal, masonry, etc.) and surplus construction chemicals (paint, caulk, epoxy). The construction

contractors will be responsible for disposal of construction-generated wastes in accordance with

applicable laws. The completed project is not anticipated to generate any significant waste,

solid or chemical.

A preliminary investigation was conducted to identify any hazardous materials in the areas to be 

demolished. These reports are located in Appendix D. Further testing on materials not previously 

tested will be conducted once the project has been approved to commence by the grant 

providers due to it requiring a destructive process. Destructive measures have been prohibited 

until the Section 106 MOA has been completed. The university will have the same On-Call 

Asbestos contractor who provided the report in Appendix D prepared to do the work once funding 
8 

has been released.

No Action Alternative

Under the No Action alternative, the existing Temple Hall would not be physically impacted.

Therefore, no impact to hazardous materials would occur under this alternative.

Proposed Temple Hall Addition

Because the proposed Temple Hall Addition does include some renovation of the existing 

Temple Hall Building that is pre-1978 construction, preliminary testing for lead-based paint and 

asbestos containing materials did show the likelihood for the presence of these materials.

Consequently, MSU will provide assurances that all hazardous materials encountered in the

implementation of this action will be handled and disposed of in accordance with federal, state, 

and local requirements.

Water Resources

Shallow groundwater typically occurs in the area in a discontinuous perched condition at the 

soil/bedrock interface, at depths of less than 20 feet below ground surface (bgs). Missouri

Department of Natural Resources' (MDNR) regulations, as well as minimal availability, preclude 

use of this groundwater resource. Groundwater of usable quantity and quality occurs at depth of 

greater than 400 feet bgs, though MDNR regulations also restrict the installation and placement 

of wells in this aquifer (http://www.dnr.mo.gov/env/wpp/lawsregs.htm). 

No drinking water wells are present in the area of the site. All utilities for the site (and the 

surrounding area), including water and sewer, are provided by Springfield City Utilities 

(http://www.cityutilities.net/about/about.htm). No water supply wells are present on the site, 

and no on-site wastewater treatment facilities are present.

No Action Alternative

Under the No Action alternative, no ground disturbance would occur. Therefore, no impact to

water resources or waters supply infrastructure would occur under this alternative.

Proposed Temple Hall Addition

The proposed action would have a limited extent of ground or subsurface physical impact so 

consequently there would be no impacts to surface or groundwater resources or to the water 

supply infrastructure.

Environmental Justice (Executive Order 12898)

Executive Order 12898 requires assessment of the potential for the project to result in

adverse effects on the health or environment of minority and low-income populations. The

project site is located in central Springfield, in a historically residential and light commercial

area. National Avenue, which serves as the eastern boundary of the MSU campus, is the

primary commercial corridor in the area, consisting largely of light retail and restaurants

abutting and extending north from the campus. Primary land use surrounding the campus is
9 

residential, consisting of well-established neighborhoods. Some commercial activity,

consisting primarily of retail and dining, is present around the perimeter of the MSU campus.

Nearest the site is the Phelps Grove Neighborhood, occupying approximately 300 acres 

bounded by National Avenue on the east, Grand Street on the north, Campbell Street on the 

west, and Brookside Drive/Bennett Street on the south. Residence types consist of primarily of 

single-family homes, though there are some high-density/multi-tenant units in the neighborhood. 

The historic nature of the Phelps Grove Neighborhood combined with its location make it a 

desirable place to live. The average single- family home price in 2012 was approximately 

$131,100 (City of Springfield Planning & Development), in comparison to the Springfield average 

of $133,000.

The Phelps Grove Neighborhood occupies the northeastern portion of zip code 65807. A review 

of ethnicity and income information from the 2010 Census for zip code 65807 reflects an 

approximately 85% white population, with a median income of $42,355

(http://www.zipdatamaps.com/65807). Based on the census data the project is not expected to 

cause disproportionate impact to minority or low- income populations.

Action Alternative

Under the No Action alternative, there would be no impact to low-income or minority

populations given the low percentage in the project area.

Proposed Temple Hall Addition

The proposed action would not have a disproportionate effect on low income or minority

populations given the location and low subject population in the area.

Streets, Traffic, Parking 

No Action Alternative

Under the No Action alternative, no physical impacts would occur in the area and therefore

there would be no impacts to streets, traffic, or parking.

Proposed Temple Hall Addition

The proposed project is expected to temporarily increase construction traffic along the

immediately adjacent sections of John Q. Hammons Parkway and Grand Street. This will 

discontinue once the project is complete. The project itself is not expected to cause an 

increased volume of other traffic, either during the project or after completion. Existing university

parking is sufficient to accommodate any increase in need due to building expansion.

Air Quality/ Noise Pollution

Existing noise sources in the project site area are primarily roadway traffic from the adjacent

Grand Street and nearby National Avenue. Other noise sources include University campus

and local neighborhood activities, and occasional aircraft overflights. Railroad noise is not a 

significant factor; the nearest rail line is approximately 0.5 miles east of the site and carries

minimal traffic. 
10

EPA's air toxics regulation for asbestos is intended to minimize the release of asbestos fibers during 

activities involving the handling of asbestos. 

Air toxics regulations under the Clean Air Act specify work practices for asbestos to be followed during 

demolitions and renovations of all facilities, including, but not limited to, structures, installations, and 

buildings (excluding residential buildings that have four or fewer dwelling units). The regulations 

require a thorough inspection where the demolition or renovation operation will occur. When buildings 

are under renovation, they are not being demolished, but asbestos-containing building material is 

being removed or disturbed. Performing the work in accordance with the Asbestos NESHAP helps to 

ensure that areas in use during the renovation are not contaminated and that the area under 

renovation, when it is complete, is also free of contamination. Missouri State University will follow all 

the requirements under NESHAP and State air quality requirements to ensure there are no air quality 

impacts resulting from the renovation of the existing structure. 

CEQ recently released guidance on conducting climate change analyses and Greenhouse Gas 

(GHG) emissions in NEPA reviews, whereby agencies should consider: (1) the potential effects of a 

proposed action on climate change, including by assessing both GHG emissions and reductions from 

the proposed action; and (2) the effects of climate change on a proposed action and its environmental 

impacts. Analyzing reasonably foreseeable climate effects in NEPA reviews helps ensure that 

decisions are based on the best available science and account for the urgency of the climate crisis. 

Buildings use large amounts of energy for heating, cooling, lighting, and other functions. "Green 

building" techniques and retrofits can allow new and existing buildings to use less energy to 

accomplish the same functions, leading to fewer greenhouse gas emissions. Based on the preliminary 

designs of this proposed addition and the nature of the construction, the follow techniques to improve 

building energy efficiency are being incorporated to ensure the GHG emissions are reduced to a 

negligible level for this proposed action - improved insulation; energy-efficient heating, cooling, 

ventilation, and refrigeration systems; efficient fluorescent lighting; passive heating and lighting to take 

advantage of sunlight; and the purchase of energy-efficient appliances and electronics. 

No Action Alternative

Under the No Action alternative, no physical impacts would occur in the area and therefore there 

would be no impacts to existing noise conditions.

Proposed Temple Hall Addition

The project area is located within an air quality attainment area (Springfield-Greene County),

which means air pollution levels for airborne concentrations of criteria pollutants do not

exceed the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Any air quality impacts from the

proposed project would be short-term, resulting from construction activities associated with the

project. Based on this, increased emissions of EPA criteria pollutants from use of the

proposed facility are not anticipated. The most notable noise impacts from the proposed 

project would be short-term construction activities associated with the project.

Cultural Resources

Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and its implementing regulations, 
11

36 CFR Part 800 "Protection of Historic Properties," requires that federal agencies must take into 

account the effects of their actions on historic properties. Historic properties are defined as 

those resources that are listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places 

(NRHP). Compliance with Section 106 of the NHPA is required for any federal undertaking,

which is defined as a project that:

• Is located on federally managed lands;

• Receives federal funding; or

• Requires a federal license or federal permit.

To determine whether an undertaking could affect NRHP-listed or -eligible properties, cultural 

resources (including archaeological, historical, and architectural properties) must be inventoried 

and evaluated for listing in the NRHP. For a property to be considered for inclusion in the NRHP, 

it must meet the criteria for eligibility detailed in 36 CFR § 60.4, as follows:

The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and 

culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity of 

location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, and:

(a) that are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad 

patterns of our history; or

(b) that are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or

(c) that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or 

that represent the work of a master or that possess high artistic values or that represent

a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; 

or

(d) that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or

history.

Among other criteria considerations, a property that has achieved significance within the last 50

years is not considered eligible for inclusion in the NRHP unless certain exceptional

conditions are met.

Under 36 CFR § 800.5(1), an adverse effect to a historic property occurs when an undertaking

may alter, directly or indirectly, any of the characteristics of a historic property that qualify the

property for inclusion in the NRHP in a manner that would diminish the integrity of the property's 

location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, or association. Adverse effects may 

include reasonably, foreseeable effects caused by the undertaking that may occur later in time, 

be farther removed in distance, or be cumulative.

The University submitted a Section 106 Review to the Missouri State Historic Preservation Office 

(SHPO) to establish eligibility status. The SHPO returned with a designation of eligibility as well

as the proposed addition having an adverse effect on the historic property. A Memorandum of 

Agreement (MOA) has been drafted and requires public notification and notification letters be 

distributed for comment prior to the finalization of the MOA. (see Appendix D for documents 

related to Section 106 and MOA)
12

No Action Alternative

Under the No Action alternative, there would be no physical impact to Temple Hall, and 

consequently a finding of no historic properties affected.

Proposed Temple Hall Addition

The proposed action has been found to have an adverse effect on a historic property requiring

the development of an MOA and mitigation conditions which must be implemented to mitigate

the impact to the historic resource.

Because there is joint federal funding for this project, the National Institute of Standards and 

Technology (NIST) has taken on the role of lead agency for the coordination of the MOA and

the completion of the Section 106 Process. As noted above, the final draft MOA is attached

and must be fully executed prior to the release of federal funding for this project.

The following are the key steps in the Section 106 compliance process for this proposed action:

• NIST and HRSA defined the Area of Potential Effect (APE) for direct effects as the historic

site boundary of the building, which is the West Mall (formerly Lombard Street) on the north,

the vacated Kings Avenue on the east, Belmont Street on the south, and John Q. Hammons 

Parkway (formerly Dollison Street) on the west.

• NIST and HRSA determined that the undertaking will have an adverse effect on Temple Hall, 

which is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion C in the 

area of Architecture, through the demolition of portions of the north and east facades at the 

northeast corner of the building, as well as the demolition of the landscape features at the 

northeast plaza to accommodate a new addition in that location.

• NIST and HRSA consulted with the Missouri State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and 

prepared a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) pursuant to 36 CFR § 800, the regulations 

implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. § 306108).

• SHPO concurred that the undertaking will have an adverse effect on a historic resource 

(Temple Hall).

• NIST and HRSA consulted with Missouri State University (MSU) regarding the effects of the 

undertaking on historic properties and has invited them to sign this MOA as an invited 

signatory.

• The Vice President for Administrative Services or the University Architect and Director of 

Planning, Design and Construction is authorized to sign the agreement and perform those 

acts necessary to carry out and perform the terms of the agreement associated with the 

undertaking. With approval of the project budget, authorization is also provided to further 

sign agreements or amendments to existing agreements directly related to this project as 

long as the approved project budget is not exceeded.

• NIST and HRSA identified the Cherokee Nation, Delaware Nation, Delaware Tribe of Indians, 

Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma, Kickapoo Tribe in Kansas, Kickapoo Tribe of 

Oklahoma, Osage Nation, Shawnee Tribe, and United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians

in Oklahoma as federally recognized tribes with potential interest in Springfield, Missouri
13

and pursuant to 36 CFR § 800.3, sent a letter on 1 March 2023, inviting all to participate as 

a consulting parties in the preparation of the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA).

Recommended Mitigation Measures

Construction activities associated with the Proposed Project could have short-term impacts on 

noise levels, air and water quality, traffic congestion and detours, safety, and the local economy. 

These impacts would be temporary, existing only for the duration of construction. This section 

describes the impacts and identifies appropriate mitigation measures.

• Air quality impacts would be temporary and would come primarily from emissions from

diesel- powered construction equipment. Some fugitive dust may also be generated by

vehicular movement on and around the site. However, because the site is relatively level,

site grading for the proposed construction is expected to be limited, minimizing dust

generation. No significant vegetation-clearing is planned. If necessary, airborne particles 

would be controlled by the application of water in accordance with established best

management practices (BMPs) for construction.

• Noise impacts would result from movement and operation of construction vehicles and 

equipment. Contractors will be required to use standard equipment with mufflers and

would make certain that equipment is in good operating condition. Based on the type of

construction proposed, construction noise would be minor, limited to daylight hours, and

would be temporary in duration.

• Water quality impacts could result from storm water runoff to local streets, storm water 

conveyance systems, and Fassnight Creek during construction activities; however, this is

expected to be minimal as no significant grading activities are anticipated with the

proposed project. Contractors will be required to follow Springfield storm water control

regulations and the University's stormwater general operating permit during construction.

• Minor adverse traffic impacts may include short-term delays along Grand Streets, but

significant in-out construction traffic is not expected to be a component of the proposed

activities nor are road closings expected.

• Construction may have a minor beneficial economic impact by increasing local and

regional employment and wage income. The number of positions and length of

employment would vary depending on the construction schedule and the contractors

selected. Opportunities for local provision of construction materials and other services 

related to construction could result in increased earnings for suppliers of materials and

services locally and in the region.

• Visual impacts related to construction would include material storage and construction 

equipment. For nearby residents, these may be visually displeasing; however, this would be a 

temporary condition and should pose no substantial long-term impacts.

• The project will have an adverse effect on Temple Hall, which was determined to be eligible 

for the National Register of Historic Places. An MOA has been developed with mitigation 

actions required to address this adverse effect.

• Lead-based paint and asbestos containing material testing has occurred and there is high 

likelihood for the presence of both with additional testing planned. MSU will sign assurances 
14

requiring them to meet all federal, state, and local requirements in the handling and disposal 

of any hazardous materials on site.

Permits

The project site is smaller than 1-acre in size. No federal, state, or local permits of an

environmental nature are anticipated for this project.

Public Notification/Controversy

This project is internal to the University and is on university-owned property. Other than traffic 

to the site during construction, there is no anticipated impact to residents/property owners 

surrounding the University. Public notice to the project is through MSU Board of Governor

meetings which are open to the public. Public notice is also provided through the Request For

Qualifications (RFQ) document (https://design.missouristate.edu/requestforqualifications.htm) and on the Capital Priorities page

(https://www.missouristate.edu/President/LegislativeAdvocacy/missouri-state-universitycapitalpriorities.htm) posted on the MSU website.

No available information indicates that this site has been a source of significant environmental 

controversy in the local community. The subject property is currently a paved open area

adjacent to an existing building. The proposed building addition project will significantly

increase the efficiency of use of the existing building. No controversial environmental issues 

are associated with the building addition and renovation.

Cumulative Effects

Federal regulations implementing NEPA (40 CFR 1508.7) define a cumulative effect (cumulative 

impact) as "the impact on the environment, which results from the incremental impact of the

action when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless 

of what agency (federal or nonfederal) or person undertakes such other actions. Cumulative 

impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant actions taking place over a 

period of time." The following sections identify and describe potential cumulative effects that

could result from the Proposed Action in combination with other past, present, or reasonably

foreseeable future human actions or natural events in the Missouri State University 

campus/central Springfield area. These other actions and events are called external actions 

because they take place independently from the Proposed Action. By considering external 

actions that could interact with the alternatives, the cumulative effects analysis allows potential 

unintended consequences of the alternatives to be identified.

The cumulative effect analysis for the proposed project alternatives include:

• Definition of spatial (geographic) and temporal (time frame) boundaries of the analysis.

• Identification of past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions that could

produce additive or synergistic environmental effects when combined with potential direct

or indirect impacts of the alternatives.

• Description and discussion of potential cumulative effects of project alternatives on the 
15

physical, biological, and human environments.

For the purposes of this analysis, the geographic boundaries consist of the Missouri State 

University campus and the adjacent neighborhoods areas immediately surrounding the campus, 

and the time frame for consideration is approximately 10 years.

Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future External Actions

Past and present external actions include planning efforts and improvements for this area by both 

the University and the City of Springfield. Neighborhood associations that provide input to 

planning for this area include the Phelps Grove Neighborhood, Roundtree Neighborhood, and 

the Walnut Street Urban Conservation District.

The University's Visioning Guide is a collaborative effort of campus stakeholders that reflects the 

vision for growth of the campus for the next 25 years. The current Visioning Guide

(https://design.missouristate.edu/FY2017VisionGuide.htm) lists the goals of the Temple Hall

project as creating updated laboratories, classrooms, and research space. The 2021-2026

Campus Master Plan (https://architect.missouristate.edu/2126Master_Plan.pdf) also reflects 

this planned expansion.

At present, The City of Springfield is making final preparations to adopt its most recent strategic 

plan, the ForwardSGF 2040 (https://www.forwardsgf.com). This document was developed

through a community-driven planning process to serve as the blueprint to guide growth and 

development decisions for the next 20 years. ForwardSGF 2040 Goal 5: Support Innovation, 

Entrepreneurship, and Workforce Development specifically supports the concept of this project, 

with Section 5.4 providing details on supporting local universities to achieve these goals.

Cumulative Effects on the Physical Environment

Cumulative effects to short-term air quality would result primarily from construction vehicle 

exhaust and fugitive dust emissions during construction activities; however, the long-term air 

quality effect is expected to be a slight reduction in overall emissions, as a result of the ability to 

accommodate additional students in an existing building with modernized building and air 

handling systems.

Cumulative Effects on the Biological Environment

Because no sensitive wildlife or habitats are present at this site, cumulative effects to the 

biological environment would result primarily from storm water impacts during construction 

activities. This will be controlled by requiring contractors to follow storm water regulations and

BMPs. Because the site is currently almost entirely covered with impervious surface, only

minor vegetation clearing will be required.

Cumulative Effects on the Human Environment

The intent of the project is increased STEM educational opportunities in modern laboratory 

environments, and while students will benefit, there will also be an overall benefit to the state

from workforce development in STEM-related fields. A modernized campus building providing an
16

improved teaching/learning environment will provide a positive cumulative effect on the 

human environment. The proposed project will create jobs, both short- and longer-term, and

serve to increase educational opportunities. This project does not displace people, jobs, or

other human resources in the area.

Based on the above analysis, no significant or lasting negative environmental impacts are

expected for this project, supporting a Finding of No Significant Impact. 
17

APPENDIX A

Site Analysis
July 2020 I Christner Architects

Missouri State University

Site Analysis

Available Sites

44k SF

43k SF

16k SF

11k SF

15k SF
18

APPENDIX B

Site Figures:

Site Location Map

Aerial Photo

FEMA Floor Map



19

APPENDIX C

MDC Heritage Review






20

APPENDIX D

Environmental Reports:

Preliminary Asbestos Inspection

Preliminary Lead Based Paint Inspection
ENVIRONMENTAL ENTERPRISES INC

1528 W EST MT. VERNON

SPRINGFIELD, MO 65802

TOLL FREE 888.282.7898

PHONE 417.863.7254

FAX 417.863.8483

ASBESTOS LEAD BIOLOGICAL
Project #: 23058

Asbestos & Lead-Based Paint Inspection

Temple Hall – Missouri State University

Springfield, Missouri
March 13, 2023

Laura Jean Derrick, csi, aia

Missouri State University

901 South National Avenue

Springfield, Missouri 65897

Phone: 417.836.7625

Email: ljderrick@missouristate.edu

RE: Preliminary Pre-Renovation, Limited Asbestos Inspection Report 

Temple Hall

910 South John Q. Hammons Parkway

Springfield, Missouri 65897

Dear Mrs. Derrick:

As requested by Missouri State University, Gerken Environmental performed a review of suspect 

asbestos materials and collected a limited number of suspect asbestos-containing building 

materials (ACBMs) in preparation for a limited pre-renovation asbestos inspection. This inspection

within the Temple Hall Building located at 910 South John Q. Hammons Parkway in Springfield, 

Missouri, (the Subject Property), was in preparation of a future renovation project.

INSPECTION OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this preliminary inspection was to determine the location of suspect asbestoscontaining materials (ACM), so that they can be documented for the historic fabric review and 

managed properly during future building renovation and demolition projects. The future inspection 

will be conducted following U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) protocols in addition to Missouri Department of 

Natural Resources (MDNR) requirements for inspections completed in the State of Missouri. 

Inspections are completed by Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) trained and 

licensed inspectors. Copies of training and certifications can be found in Attachment E.

BACKGROUND

The Subject Property was comprised of a four-story school building containing approximately 

40,000 square feet. The building is constructed with concrete block walls and utilizes steam for 

heat and chilled water for air-conditioned spaces. Roofing is rubber and aggregate and according 

to the client, is original to the building. 
Page 2 of 4

Project Number: 23058

Temple Hall – Missouri State University – Springfield, Missouri

Preliminary Pre-Renovation, Limited Asbestos Inspection Report

www.gerkenenvironmental.com

Gerken Environmental identified four (4) types of suspect asbestos-containing building materials 

(ACBM) as part of the preliminary inspection within the Temple Hall Building located 910 South 

John Q. Hammons Parkway in Springfield, Missouri, (the Subject Property). These materials 

included: thermal pipe insulation, ceiling tile, drywall system, and acoustical wall tile. Additional 

suspect materials have been noted and will be sampled once the historic fabric review is complete. 

These materials include window caulking, window glazing, roofing materials, plaster ceilings, flooring 

materials (including tile and mastic), as well as materials uncovered when floor and ceiling finishes 

are removed.

SCOPE OF WORK

Limited ACBM sampling of the Subject Property was performed on March 9, 2023, by 

Mr. Scott Samuels, a State of Missouri Certified Asbestos Inspector (Certificate#

7011110221MOIR1489). This assessment was limited to the future building connection area of 

the Temple Hall Building located at 910 South John Q. Hammons Parkway in Springfield, Missouri, 

(the Subject Property). 

The preliminary sampling event involved locating and assessing the condition of accessible suspect 

ACBM, not part of the historic fabric review, using sampling and visual inspection techniques, to 

develop a report which identifies the extent of the materials present within the proposed work areas. 

ASBESTOS-CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIALS (ACBM) 

Asbestos-containing building materials are generally classified as friable or non-friable. Friable 

materials are those which can be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure or 

by normal use or maintenance emits or can be expected to emit asbestos into the air. 

Gerken Environmental collected twelve (12) representative samples of suspect ACBMs from 

different homogenous areas at the Subject Property. A map, indicating Work Area Locations is 

provided in Attachment D of this Report. Suspect ACBM samples were then submitted to 

International Asbestos Testing Laboratories (iATL), located in Mt. Laurel, New Jersey, a 

state-licensed and accredited laboratory for analysis of asbestos content.

All samples were analyzed via polarized light microscopy with the dispersion staining (PLM/DS)

method. By using the PLM/DS method, a trained microscopist is able to identify and distinguish 

between asbestos group minerals and other fibrous materials such as cellulose (paper), mineral 

(rock), wood, or glass fiber. The quantity of each of these substances is estimated on a weight basis 

and recorded as a percent.

Only the asbestos content, if any, is recorded in the bulk sample Report of Analysis. If a material 

contains greater than 1% asbestos, it is considered to be an ACBM by EPA standards. The following 

table presents the sample location, asbestos content, friability, and estimated “approximate (~)” 

quantity of bulk samples of suspect ACBM collected at the Subject Property.

Materials containing less than one percent (<1%) of asbestos fibers do not meet the definition of 

ACM under US EPA NESHAP; however, are regulated by US OSHA. 
Page 3 of 4

Project Number: 23058

Temple Hall – Missouri State University – Springfield, Missouri

Preliminary Pre-Renovation, Limited Asbestos Inspection Report

www.gerkenenvironmental.com

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Based upon the laboratory analysis, the following materials have been identified as ACBM:

ACBM LOCATION ASBESTOS % QUANTITY CONDITION

Drywall Joint Compound

** Composite Drywall System ** Throughout 1.2 to 1.3% Chrysotile** Composite <1% ** TBD Good

The EPA allows for drywall materials to be sampled as a drywall system. This system includes the 

drywall board material along with the drywall joint compound. This sample is considered a composite 

sample of the system. While the EPA only regulates asbestos materials containing 1% asbestos 

and greater, OSHA regulates asbestos materials with any percentage of asbestos. We recommend

if these materials are to remain in place during demolition, proper communication and work 

practices should be used to control asbestos contamination and personnel exposure.

In the event renovation/demolition procedures are likely to disturb these materials, the ACBM 

should be addressed with the owners general contractor as required by the OSHA Hazard 

Communication Standard. 

Materials identified as ACBM which will not be impacted by renovation or demolition activities should 

be included in the Asbestos Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan for the Subject Property. 

Gerken Environmental recommends that the identified ACBMs be maintained in place via 

development and implementation of an Asbestos Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan. This 

O&M Plan should provide procedures and guidelines that, when used during facility cleaning, 

maintenance, and general operations, will minimize human exposure to asbestos fibers and 

minimize the release of asbestos fibers to the environment. 

LIMITATIONS

This Report presents the findings of the present survey but does not constitute a complete 

determination of whether past or present owners or occupants of the Subject Property have been 

in compliance with all applicable local, state, and federal environmental regulations. The information 

contained herein is based on on-site observations and on a survey involving site observations and 

sampling only. The investigative methods applied to this assessment are consistent with current 

industry standards for the performance of investigation within the limits of the scope of work, 

budget, and schedule. It should be noted that no conclusions can be drawn regarding the existence 

of conditions that were not addressed by the scope of work. 

This survey and Report were prepared by Gerken Environmental solely for the use of Missouri State 

University. Third-party use of this Report is prohibited without the prior written consent of 

Gerken Environmental and use thereof is at the risk of the user. The observations and results 

presented in this Report are believed to be representative of site conditions prevailing at the time 

of the assessment in the areas explored. Changes in site conditions or in the availability of 

information regarding past or current site conditions should be brought to the attention of 
Page 4 of 4

Project Number: 23058

Temple Hall – Missouri State University – Springfield, Missouri

Preliminary Pre-Renovation, Limited Asbestos Inspection Report

www.gerkenenvironmental.com

Gerken Environmental so that they can be addressed and Gerken Environmental’s conclusions 

verified or modified as appropriate. 

It has been a pleasure to prepare this Report for you. Please contact Greg Gerken at 

417.838.3441, if you should have any questions or comments, or if we can be of further assistance 

in any way. 

Respectfully,

Angela C. Gerken Scott Samuels

Report Manager Asbestos Inspector

Testing & Consulting Division Testing & Consulting Division

Gerken Environmental Enterprises, Inc. Gerken Environmental Enterprises, Inc.

Attachment A: ACBM Schedule

Attachment B: Laboratory Analysis

Attachment C: Chain of Custody

Attachment D: Work Area Location(s)

Attachment E: Inspector Certification
Laboratory Analysis
/DE1R

&OLHQW1R 



$QDO\VW2EVHUYDWLRQ<HOORZ,QVXODWLRQ

&OLHQW'HVFULSWLRQ3LSH,QVXODWLRQ$ERYH&HLOLQJ



/RFDWLRQVW)ORRU7RS

)DFLOLW\

3HUFHQW$VEHVWRV

1RQH'HWHFWHG



3HUFHQW1RQ$VEHVWRV)LEURXV0DWHULDO

)LEURXV*ODVV



3HUFHQW1RQ)LEURXV0DWHULDO

1RQH'HWHFWHG



/DE1R/

&OLHQW1R 



$QDO\VW2EVHUYDWLRQ:KLWH:RYHQ0DWHULDO

&OLHQW'HVFULSWLRQ3LSH,QVXODWLRQ$ERYH&HLOLQJ



/RFDWLRQVW)ORRU7RS

)DFLOLW\

3HUFHQW$VEHVWRV

1RQH'HWHFWHG



3HUFHQW1RQ$VEHVWRV)LEURXV0DWHULDO

&HOOXORVH



3HUFHQW1RQ)LEURXV0DWHULDO

1RQH'HWHFWHG



/DE1R

&OLHQW1R 



$QDO\VW2EVHUYDWLRQ<HOORZ,QVXODWLRQ

&OLHQW'HVFULSWLRQ3LSH,QVXODWLRQ$ERYH&HLOLQJ



/RFDWLRQVW)ORRU7RS

)DFLOLW\

3HUFHQW$VEHVWRV

1RQH'HWHFWHG



3HUFHQW1RQ$VEHVWRV)LEURXV0DWHULDO

)LEURXV*ODVV



3HUFHQW1RQ)LEURXV0DWHULDO

1RQH'HWHFWHG



/DE1R/

&OLHQW1R 



$QDO\VW2EVHUYDWLRQ:KLWH:RYHQ0DWHULDO

&OLHQW'HVFULSWLRQ3LSH,QVXODWLRQ$ERYH&HLOLQJ



/RFDWLRQVW)ORRU7RS

)DFLOLW\

3HUFHQW$VEHVWRV

1RQH'HWHFWHG



3HUFHQW1RQ$VEHVWRV)LEURXV0DWHULDO

&HOOXORVH



3HUFHQW1RQ)LEURXV0DWHULDO

1RQH'HWHFWHG



/DE1R

&OLHQW1R 



$QDO\VW2EVHUYDWLRQ<HOORZ,QVXODWLRQ

&OLHQW'HVFULSWLRQ3LSH,QVXODWLRQ$ERYH&HLOLQJ



/RFDWLRQVW)ORRU7RS

)DFLOLW\

3HUFHQW$VEHVWRV

1RQH'HWHFWHG



3HUFHQW1RQ$VEHVWRV)LEURXV0DWHULDO

)LEURXV*ODVV



3HUFHQW1RQ)LEURXV0DWHULDO

1RQH'HWHFWHG



/DE1R/

&OLHQW1R 



$QDO\VW2EVHUYDWLRQ:KLWH:RYHQ0DWHULDO

&OLHQW'HVFULSWLRQ3LSH,QVXODWLRQ$ERYH&HLOLQJ



/RFDWLRQVW)ORRU7RS

)DFLOLW\

3HUFHQW$VEHVWRV

1RQH'HWHFWHG



3HUFHQW1RQ$VEHVWRV)LEURXV0DWHULDO

&HOOXORVH



3HUFHQW1RQ)LEURXV0DWHULDO

1RQH'HWHFWHG

/DERUDWRU\'LUHFWRU

$SSURYHG%\

'DWH$QDO\]HG

'DWH5HFHLYHG 

$QDO\VW

3OHDVHUHIHUWRWKH$SSHQGL[RIWKLVUHSRUWIRUIXUWKHULQIRUPDWLRQUHJDUGLQJ\RXUDQDO\VLV

6LJQDWXUH

$LGDQ%HFNHU



)UDQN((KUHQIHOG,,,

&RPPHUFH3DUNZD\6XLWH%

0W/DXUHO1HZ-HUVH\

7HOHSKRQH

(PDLOFXVWRPHUVHUYLFH#LDWOFRP

&(57,),&$7(2)$1$/<6,6

&OLHQW *HUNHQ(QYLURQPHQWDO(QWHUSULVHV,QF

:HVW0W9HUQRQ

6SULQJILHOG02

5HSRUW'DWH 

5HSRUW1R 3/0

3URMHFW 7HPSOH+DOO

3URMHFW1R 

3/0%8/.6$03/($1$/<6,66800$5<

&OLHQW *(5

5HY

'DWHG 3DJHRI
/DE1R

&OLHQW1R 



$QDO\VW2EVHUYDWLRQ<HOORZ,QVXODWLRQ

&OLHQW'HVFULSWLRQ3LSH,QVXODWLRQ$ERYH&HLOLQJ



/RFDWLRQVW)ORRU%RWWRP

)DFLOLW\

3HUFHQW$VEHVWRV

1RQH'HWHFWHG



3HUFHQW1RQ$VEHVWRV)LEURXV0DWHULDO

)LEURXV*ODVV



3HUFHQW1RQ)LEURXV0DWHULDO

1RQH'HWHFWHG



/DE1R/

&OLHQW1R 



$QDO\VW2EVHUYDWLRQ:KLWH:RYHQ0DWHULDO

&OLHQW'HVFULSWLRQ3LSH,QVXODWLRQ$ERYH&HLOLQJ



/RFDWLRQVW)ORRU%RWWRP

)DFLOLW\

3HUFHQW$VEHVWRV

1RQH'HWHFWHG



3HUFHQW1RQ$VEHVWRV)LEURXV0DWHULDO

&HOOXORVH



3HUFHQW1RQ)LEURXV0DWHULDO

1RQH'HWHFWHG



/DE1R

&OLHQW1R 



$QDO\VW2EVHUYDWLRQ<HOORZ,QVXODWLRQ

&OLHQW'HVFULSWLRQ3LSH,QVXODWLRQ$ERYH&HLOLQJ



/RFDWLRQVW)ORRU%RWWRP

)DFLOLW\

3HUFHQW$VEHVWRV

1RQH'HWHFWHG



3HUFHQW1RQ$VEHVWRV)LEURXV0DWHULDO

)LEURXV*ODVV



3HUFHQW1RQ)LEURXV0DWHULDO

1RQH'HWHFWHG



/DE1R/

&OLHQW1R 



$QDO\VW2EVHUYDWLRQ:KLWH:RYHQ0DWHULDO

&OLHQW'HVFULSWLRQ3LSH,QVXODWLRQ$ERYH&HLOLQJ



/RFDWLRQVW)ORRU%RWWRP

)DFLOLW\

3HUFHQW$VEHVWRV

1RQH'HWHFWHG



3HUFHQW1RQ$VEHVWRV)LEURXV0DWHULDO

&HOOXORVH



3HUFHQW1RQ)LEURXV0DWHULDO

1RQH'HWHFWHG



/DE1R

&OLHQW1R 



$QDO\VW2EVHUYDWLRQ<HOORZ,QVXODWLRQ

&OLHQW'HVFULSWLRQ3LSH,QVXODWLRQ$ERYH&HLOLQJ



/RFDWLRQVW)ORRU%RWWRP

)DFLOLW\

3HUFHQW$VEHVWRV

1RQH'HWHFWHG



3HUFHQW1RQ$VEHVWRV)LEURXV0DWHULDO

)LEURXV*ODVV



3HUFHQW1RQ)LEURXV0DWHULDO

1RQH'HWHFWHG



/DE1R/

&OLHQW1R 



$QDO\VW2EVHUYDWLRQ:KLWH:RYHQ0DWHULDO

&OLHQW'HVFULSWLRQ3LSH,QVXODWLRQ$ERYH&HLOLQJ



/RFDWLRQVW)ORRU%RWWRP

)DFLOLW\

3HUFHQW$VEHVWRV

1RQH'HWHFWHG



3HUFHQW1RQ$VEHVWRV)LEURXV0DWHULDO

&HOOXORVH



3HUFHQW1RQ)LEURXV0DWHULDO

1RQH'HWHFWHG

/DERUDWRU\'LUHFWRU

$SSURYHG%\

'DWH$QDO\]HG

'DWH5HFHLYHG 

$QDO\VW

3OHDVHUHIHUWRWKH$SSHQGL[RIWKLVUHSRUWIRUIXUWKHULQIRUPDWLRQUHJDUGLQJ\RXUDQDO\VLV

6LJQDWXUH

$LGDQ%HFNHU



)UDQN((KUHQIHOG,,,

&RPPHUFH3DUNZD\6XLWH%

0W/DXUHO1HZ-HUVH\

7HOHSKRQH

(PDLOFXVWRPHUVHUYLFH#LDWOFRP

&(57,),&$7(2)$1$/<6,6

&OLHQW *HUNHQ(QYLURQPHQWDO(QWHUSULVHV,QF

:HVW0W9HUQRQ

6SULQJILHOG02

5HSRUW'DWH 

5HSRUW1R 3/0

3URMHFW 7HPSOH+DOO

3URMHFW1R 

3/0%8/.6$03/($1$/<6,66800$5<

&OLHQW *(5

5HY

'DWHG 3DJHRI
/DE1R

&OLHQW1R 



$QDO\VW2EVHUYDWLRQ:KLWH&HLOLQJ7LOH

&OLHQW'HVFULSWLRQ:KLWH[&HLOLQJ7LOH6PDOO+ROH

3DWWHUQ



/RFDWLRQVW)ORRU+DOO

)DFLOLW\

3HUFHQW$VEHVWRV

1RQH'HWHFWHG



3HUFHQW1RQ$VEHVWRV)LEURXV0DWHULDO

&HOOXORVH

)LEURXV*ODVV



3HUFHQW1RQ)LEURXV0DWHULDO





/DE1R

&OLHQW1R 



$QDO\VW2EVHUYDWLRQ:KLWH&HLOLQJ7LOH

&OLHQW'HVFULSWLRQ:KLWH[&HLOLQJ7LOH6PDOO+ROH

3DWWHUQ



/RFDWLRQVW)ORRU+DOO

)DFLOLW\

3HUFHQW$VEHVWRV

1RQH'HWHFWHG



3HUFHQW1RQ$VEHVWRV)LEURXV0DWHULDO

&HOOXORVH

)LEURXV*ODVV



3HUFHQW1RQ)LEURXV0DWHULDO





/DE1R

&OLHQW1R 



$QDO\VW2EVHUYDWLRQ:KLWH'U\ZDOO

&OLHQW'HVFULSWLRQ'U\ZDOO



/RFDWLRQ5RRP

)DFLOLW\

3HUFHQW$VEHVWRV

1RQH'HWHFWHG



3HUFHQW1RQ$VEHVWRV)LEURXV0DWHULDO

&HOOXORVH



3HUFHQW1RQ)LEURXV0DWHULDO





/DE1R/

&OLHQW1R 



$QDO\VW2EVHUYDWLRQ:KLWH-RLQW&RPSRXQG

&OLHQW'HVFULSWLRQ'U\ZDOO



/RFDWLRQ5RRP

)DFLOLW\

3HUFHQW$VEHVWRV

3&&KU\VRWLOH 

3HUFHQW1RQ$VEHVWRV)LEURXV0DWHULDO

1RQH'HWHFWHG



3HUFHQW1RQ)LEURXV0DWHULDO





/DE1R/

&OLHQW1R 



$QDO\VW2EVHUYDWLRQ&RPSRVLWH

&OLHQW'HVFULSWLRQ'U\ZDOO



/RFDWLRQ5RRP

)DFLOLW\

3HUFHQW$VEHVWRV

3&7UDFH&KU\VRWLOH 

3HUFHQW1RQ$VEHVWRV)LEURXV0DWHULDO

&HOOXORVH



3HUFHQW1RQ)LEURXV0DWHULDO





/DE1R

&OLHQW1R 



$QDO\VW2EVHUYDWLRQ:KLWH'U\ZDOO

&OLHQW'HVFULSWLRQ'U\ZDOO



/RFDWLRQ5RRP

)DFLOLW\

3HUFHQW$VEHVWRV

1RQH'HWHFWHG



3HUFHQW1RQ$VEHVWRV)LEURXV0DWHULDO

&HOOXORVH



3HUFHQW1RQ)LEURXV0DWHULDO



/DERUDWRU\'LUHFWRU

$SSURYHG%\

'DWH$QDO\]HG

'DWH5HFHLYHG 

$QDO\VW

3OHDVHUHIHUWRWKH$SSHQGL[RIWKLVUHSRUWIRUIXUWKHULQIRUPDWLRQUHJDUGLQJ\RXUDQDO\VLV

6LJQDWXUH

$LGDQ%HFNHU



)UDQN((KUHQIHOG,,,

&RPPHUFH3DUNZD\6XLWH%

0W/DXUHO1HZ-HUVH\

7HOHSKRQH

(PDLOFXVWRPHUVHUYLFH#LDWOFRP

&(57,),&$7(2)$1$/<6,6

&OLHQW *HUNHQ(QYLURQPHQWDO(QWHUSULVHV,QF

:HVW0W9HUQRQ

6SULQJILHOG02

5HSRUW'DWH 

5HSRUW1R 3/0

3URMHFW 7HPSOH+DOO

3URMHFW1R 

3/0%8/.6$03/($1$/<6,66800$5<

&OLHQW *(5

5HY

'DWHG 3DJHRI
/DE1R/

&OLHQW1R 



$QDO\VW2EVHUYDWLRQ:KLWH-RLQW&RPSRXQG

&OLHQW'HVFULSWLRQ'U\ZDOO



/RFDWLRQ5RRP

)DFLOLW\

3HUFHQW$VEHVWRV

3&&KU\VRWLOH 

3HUFHQW1RQ$VEHVWRV)LEURXV0DWHULDO

1RQH'HWHFWHG



3HUFHQW1RQ)LEURXV0DWHULDO





/DE1R/

&OLHQW1R 



$QDO\VW2EVHUYDWLRQ&RPSRVLWH

&OLHQW'HVFULSWLRQ'U\ZDOO



/RFDWLRQ5RRP

)DFLOLW\

3HUFHQW$VEHVWRV

3&7UDFH&KU\VRWLOH 

3HUFHQW1RQ$VEHVWRV)LEURXV0DWHULDO

&HOOXORVH



3HUFHQW1RQ)LEURXV0DWHULDO





/DE1R

&OLHQW1R 



$QDO\VW2EVHUYDWLRQ:KLWH&HLOLQJ7LOH

&OLHQW'HVFULSWLRQ$FRXVWLFDO:DOO7LOH



/RFDWLRQ2XWVLGH5RRP

)DFLOLW\

3HUFHQW$VEHVWRV

1RQH'HWHFWHG



3HUFHQW1RQ$VEHVWRV)LEURXV0DWHULDO

)LEURXV*ODVV



3HUFHQW1RQ)LEURXV0DWHULDO





/DE1R

&OLHQW1R 



$QDO\VW2EVHUYDWLRQ:KLWH&HLOLQJ7LOH

&OLHQW'HVFULSWLRQ$FRXVWLFDO:DOO7LOH



/RFDWLRQ2XWVLGH5RRP

)DFLOLW\

3HUFHQW$VEHVWRV

1RQH'HWHFWHG



3HUFHQW1RQ$VEHVWRV)LEURXV0DWHULDO

)LEURXV*ODVV



3HUFHQW1RQ)LEURXV0DWHULDO



/DERUDWRU\'LUHFWRU

$SSURYHG%\

'DWH$QDO\]HG

'DWH5HFHLYHG 

$QDO\VW

3OHDVHUHIHUWRWKH$SSHQGL[RIWKLVUHSRUWIRUIXUWKHULQIRUPDWLRQUHJDUGLQJ\RXUDQDO\VLV

6LJQDWXUH

$LGDQ%HFNHU



)UDQN((KUHQIHOG,,,

&RPPHUFH3DUNZD\6XLWH%

0W/DXUHO1HZ-HUVH\

7HOHSKRQH

(PDLOFXVWRPHUVHUYLFH#LDWOFRP

&(57,),&$7(2)$1$/<6,6

&OLHQW *HUNHQ(QYLURQPHQWDO(QWHUSULVHV,QF

:HVW0W9HUQRQ

6SULQJILHOG02

5HSRUW'DWH 

5HSRUW1R 3/0

3URMHFW 7HPSOH+DOO

3URMHFW1R 

3/0%8/.6$03/($1$/<6,66800$5<

&OLHQW *(5

5HY

'DWHG 3DJHRI
$SSHQGL[WR$QDO\WLFDO5HSRUW

&XVWRPHU&RQWDFW$O*HUNHQ

0HWKRG&)5$SSHQGL[(WR6XESDUW(RI3DUWLQWHULPPHWKRGIRUWKH'HWHUPLQDWLRQRI$VEHVWRVLQ%XON,QVXODWLRQ6DPSOHV86(3$5DQG

1<6'2+(/$3DVQHHGHG



7KLVDSSHQGL[VHHNVWRSURPRWHJUHDWHUXQGHUVWDQGLQJRIDQ\REVHUYDWLRQVH[FHSWLRQVVSHFLDOLQVWUXFWLRQVRUFLUFXPVWDQFHVWKDWWKHODERUDWRU\QHHGVWRFRPPXQLFDWHWR

WKHFOLHQWFRQFHUQLQJWKHDERYHVDPSOHV7KHLQIRUPDWLRQEHORZLVXVHGWRKHOSSURPRWH\RXUDELOLW\WRPDNHWKHPRVWLQIRUPHGGHFLVLRQVIRU\RXDQG\RXUFXVWRPHUV

3OHDVHQRWHWKHIROORZLQJSRLQWVRIFRQWDFWIRUDQ\TXHVWLRQV\RXPD\KDYH



L$7/&XVWRPHU6HUYLFHFXVWRPHUVHUYLFH#LDWOFRP

L$7/2IILFH0DQDJHUZFKDPSLRQ#LDWOFRP

L$7/$FFRXQW5HSUHVHQWDWLYH.HOO\.OLSSHO

6DPSOH/RJLQ1RWHV6HH%DWFK6KHHW$WWDFKHG

6DPSOH0DWUL[%XON%XLOGLQJ0DWHULDOV

([FHSWLRQV1RWHG6HH)ROORZLQJ3DJHV 

*HQHUDO7HUPV:DUUDQWV/LPLWV4XDOLILHUV



*HQHUDOLQIRUPDWLRQDERXWL$7/FDSDELOLWLHVDQGFOLHQWODERUDWRU\UHODWLRQVKLSVDQGUHVSRQVLELOLWLHVDUHVSHOOHGRXWLQL$7/SROLFLHVWKDWDUHOLVWHGDWZZZL$7/FRPDQGLQ

RXU4XDOLW\$VVXUDQFH0DQXDOSHU,62VWDQGDUGUHTXLUHPHQWV7KHLQIRUPDWLRQWKHUHLQLVDUHSUHVHQWDWLRQRIL$7/GHILQLWLRQVDQGSROLFLHVIRUWXUQDURXQGWLPHV

VDPSOHVXEPLWWDOFROOHFWLRQPHGLDEODQNGHILQLWLRQVTXDQWLILFDWLRQLVVXHVDQGOLPLWRIGHWHFWLRQDQDO\WLFDOPHWKRGVDQGSURFHGXUHVVXEFRQWUDFWLQJSROLFLHVUHVXOWV

UHSRUWLQJRSWLRQVIHHVWHUPVDQGGLVFRXQWVFRQILGHQWLDOLW\VDPSOHDUFKLYDODQGGLVSRVDODQGGDWDLQWHUSUHWDWLRQ



L$7/ZDUUDQWVWKHWHVWUHVXOWVWREHRIDSUHFLVLRQQRUPDOIRUWKHW\SHDQGPHWKRGRORJ\HPSOR\HGIRUHDFKVDPSOHVXEPLWWHGL$7/GLVFODLPVDQ\RWKHUZDUUDQWV

H[SUHVVHGRULPSOLHGLQFOXGLQJZDUUDQW\RIILWQHVVIRUDSDUWLFXODUSXUSRVHDQGZDUUDQW\RIPHUFKDQWDELOLW\L$7/DFFHSWVQROHJDOUHVSRQVLELOLW\IRUWKHSXUSRVHIRUZKLFK

WKHFOLHQWXVHVWHVWUHVXOWV$Q\DQDO\WLFDOZRUNSHUIRUPHGPXVWEHJRYHUQHGE\RXU6WDQGDUG7HUPVDQG&RQGLWLRQV3ULFHVPHWKRGVDQGGHWHFWLRQOLPLWVPD\EHFKDQJHG

ZLWKRXWQRWLILFDWLRQ3OHDVHFRQWDFW\RXU&XVWRPHU6HUYLFH5HSUHVHQWDWLYHIRUWKHPRVWFXUUHQWLQIRUPDWLRQ



7KLVFRQILGHQWLDOUHSRUWUHODWHVRQO\WRWKRVHLWHPVWHVWHGDQGGRHVQRWUHSUHVHQWDQHQGRUVHPHQWE\1,6719/$3$,+$/$3//&RUDQ\DJHQF\RIORFDOVWDWHRU

SURYLQFHJRYHUQPHQWVQRURIDQ\DJHQF\RIWKH86JRYHUQPHQW



7KLVUHSRUWVKDOOQRWEHUHSURGXFHGH[FHSWLQIXOOZLWKRXWZULWWHQDSSURYDORIWKHODERUDWRU\



,QIRUPDWLRQ3HUWLQHQWWRWKLV5HSRUW

$QDO\VLVE\86(3$'HWHUPLQDWLRQRI$VEHVWRVLQ%XON%XLOGLQJ0DWHULDOVE\3RODUL]HG/LJKW0LFURVFRS\3/0



&HUWLILFDWLRQV

 1,6719/$31R

 1<6'2+(/$31R

 $,+$/$3//&1R

4XDQWLILFDWLRQDWE\YROXPHLVSRVVLEOHZLWKWKLVPHWKRG3&,QGLFDWHV6WUDWLILHG3RLQW&RXQW0HWKRGSHUIRUPHG3&7UDFHPHDQVWKDWDVEHVWRVZDVGHWHFWHG

EXWLVQRWTXDQWLILDEOHXQGHUWKH3RLQW&RXQWLQJUHJLPHQ3&7UDFHUHSUHVHQWVDDPRXQW$QDO\VLVLQFOXGHVDOOGLVWLQFWVHSDUDEOHOD\HUVLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWK(3$

0HWKRG,IQRWUHSRUWHGRURWKHUZLVHQRWHGOD\HULVHLWKHUQRWSUHVHQWRUWKHFOLHQWKDVVSHFLILFDOO\UHTXHVWHGWKDWLWQRWEHDQDO\]HGH[DQDO\]HXQWLOSRVLWLYH

LQVWUXFWLRQV6PDOODVEHVWRVILEHUVPD\EHPLVVHGE\3/0GXHWRUHVROXWLRQOLPLWDWLRQVRIWKHRSWLFDOPLFURVFRSH7KHUHIRUH3/0LVQRWFRQVLVWHQWO\UHOLDEOHLQGHWHFWLQJ

DVEHVWRVLQQRQIULDEOHRUJDQLFDOO\ERXQG12%PDWHULDOV4XDQWLWDWLYHWUDQVPLVVLRQHOHFWURQPLFURVFRS\7(0LVFXUUHQWO\WKHRQO\PHWKRGWKDWFDQSURQRXQFH

PDWHULDOVDVQRQDVEHVWRVFRQWDLQLQJ



$QDO\WLFDO0HWKRGRORJ\$OWHUQDWLYHV<RXULQLWLDOUHTXHVWIRUDQDO\VLVPD\QRWKDYHDFFRXQWHGIRUUHFHQWDGYDQFHVLQUHJXODWRU\UHTXLUHPHQWVRUDGYDQFHVLQWHFKQRORJ\

WKDWDUHURXWLQHO\XVHGLQVLPLODUVLWXDWLRQVIRURWKHUTXDOLILHGSURMHFWV<RXPD\KDYHWKHRSWLRQWRH[SORUHDGGLWLRQDODQDO\VLVIRUIXUWKHULQIRUPDWLRQ%HORZDUHDIHZ

RSWLRQVOLVWHGDVWKHPDWUL[IROORZHGE\WKHDSSURSULDWHPHWKRGRORJ\$OVRLQFOXGHGDUHOLQNVWRPRUHLQIRUPDWLRQRQRXUZHEVLWH



%XON%XLOGLQJ0DWHULDOVWKDWDUH1RQ)ULDEOH2UJDQLFDOO\%RXQG12%E\*UDYLPHWULF5HGXFWLRQWHFKQLTXHVHPSOR\LQJ3/0DQG7(0(/$33/012%

(/$37(012%6HHDGGLWLRQDOLQIRUPDWLRQDWWKHHQGRIWKLVDSSHQGL[



&RPPHUFH3DUNZD\6XLWH%

0W/DXUHO1HZ-HUVH\

7HOHSKRQH

(PDLOFXVWRPHUVHUYLFH#LDWOFRP

&(57,),&$7(2)$1$/<6,6

&OLHQW *HUNHQ(QYLURQPHQWDO(QWHUSULVHV,QF

:HVW0W9HUQRQ

6SULQJILHOG02

5HSRUW'DWH 

5HSRUW1R 3/0

3URMHFW 7HPSOH+DOO

3URMHFW1R 

&OLHQW *(5

'DWHG 3DJHRI
/RRVH)LOO9HUPLFXOLWH,QVXODWLRQ$WWLF,QVXODWLRQ=RQROLWHFRS\ULJKWHWF86(3$5PXOWLWLHUHGDQDO\WLFDOSURFHVV

6SUD\HG2Q,QVXODWLRQ)LUHSURRILQJZLWK9HUPLFXOLWH62)9(/$33/062)9



6RLOVOXGJHVHGLPHQWDJJUHJDWHDQGOLNHPDWHULDOVDQDO\]HGIRUDVEHVWRVRURWKHUHORQJDWHGPLQHUDOSDUWLFOHVH[HULRQLWHHWF$670'&$5%DQGRWKHU

RSWLRQVDYDLODEOH



$VEHVWRVLQ6XUIDFH'XVWDFFRUGLQJWRRQHRI$670
V0HWKRGVYHU\GHSHQGHQWRQVDPSOLQJFROOHFWLRQWHFKQLTXH±E\7(0$670''RU'



9DULRXVRWKHUDVEHVWRVPDWULFHVDLUZDWHUHWFDQGDQDO\WLFDOPHWKRGVDUHDYDLODEOH



'LVFODLPHUV4XDOLILHUV

7KHUHPD\EHVRPHVDPSOHVLQWKLVSURMHFWWKDWKDYHD127(DVVRFLDWHGZLWKDVDPSOHUHVXOW:HXVHDGGHGGLVFODLPHUVRUTXDOLILHUVWRLQIRUPWKHFOLHQWDERXW

VRPHWKLQJWKDWUHTXLUHVIXUWKHUH[SODQDWLRQ+HUHLVDOLVWZLWKKLJKOLJKWHGGLVFODLPHUVWKDWPD\EHSHUWLQHQWWRWKLVSURMHFW)RUDIXOOH[SODQDWLRQRIWKHVHDQGRWKHU

GLVFODLPHUVSOHDVHLQTXLUHDWFXVWRPHUVHUYLFH#LDWOFRP 

1RWH1RPDVWLFSURYLGHGIRUDQDO\VLV

1RWH,QVXIILFLHQWPDVWLFSURYLGHGIRUDQDO\VLV

1RWH,QVXIILFLHQWPDWHULDOSURYLGHGIRUDQDO\VLV

1RWH,QVXIILFLHQWVDPSOHSURYLGHGIRU4&UHDQDO\VLV

1RWH'LIIHUHQWPDWHULDOWKDQLQGLFDWHGRQ6DPSOH/RJ'HVFULSWLRQ

1RWH6DPSOHQRWVXEPLWWHG

1RWH$WWDFKHGWRDVEHVWRVFRQWDLQLQJPDWHULDO

1RWH5HFHLYHGZHW

1RWH3RVVLEOHVXUIDFHFRQWDPLQDWLRQ

1RWH1RWEXLOGLQJPDWHULDOWKUHVKROGPD\QRWDSSO\

1RWH5HFRPPHQG7(012%DQDO\VLVDVSHU(3$UHFRPPHQGDWLRQV

1RWH$VEHVWRVGHWHFWHGEXWQRWTXDQWLILDEOH

1RWH0XOWLSOHLGHQWLFDOVDPSOHVVXEPLWWHGRQO\RQHDQDO\]HG

1RWH$QDO\]HGE\(3$53RLQW&RXQWLQJGHWHFWLRQOLPLWDW

1RWH$QDO\]HGE\(3$53RLQW&RXQWLQJGHWHFWLRQOLPLWDW

1RWH7KLVVDPSOHFRQWDLQV!YHUPLFXOLWHPLQHUDO6HH$SSHQGL[IRU5HFRPPHQGDWLRQVIRU9HUPLFXOLWH$QDO\VLV



5HFRPPHQGDWLRQVIRU9HUPLFXOLWH$QDO\VLV



6HYHUDODQDO\WLFDOSURWRFROVH[LVWIRUWKHDQDO\VLVRIDVEHVWRVLQYHUPLFXOLWH7KHVHDQDO\WLFDODSSURDFKHVYDU\GHSHQGLQJXSRQWKHQDWXUHRIWKHYHUPLFXOLWHPLQHUDOEHLQJ

WHVWHGHJXQSURFHVVHGJDQJHKRPRJHQHRXVH[IROLDWHGERRNVRIPLFDRUPL[HGPLQHUDOFRPSRVLWHV3OHDVHFRQWDFW\RXUFOLHQWUHSUHVHQWDWLYHIRUSULFLQJDQGWXUQDURXQG

WLPHRSWLRQVDYDLODEOH



L$7/UHFRPPHQGVLQLWLDOWHVWLQJXVLQJWKH(3$5PHWKRG7KLVPHWKRGLVVSHFLILFDOO\GHVLJQHGIRUWKHDQDO\VLVRIDVEHVWRVLQEXONEXLOGLQJPDWHULDOV,W

SURYLGHVDQDFFHSWDEOHVWDUWLQJSRLQWIRUSULPDU\VFUHHQLQJRIYHUPLFXOLWHIRUSRVVLEOHDVEHVWRV



5HVXOWVIURPWKLVWHVWLQJPD\EHLQFRQFOXVLYH(3$VXJJHVWVSURFHHGLQJWRDPXOWLWLHUHGDQDO\VLVLQYROYLQJZHWVHSDUDWLRQWHFKQLTXHVLQFRQMXQFWLRQZLWK3/0DQG7(0

JUDYLPHWULFDQDO\VLV(3$5



)RU1HZ<RUN6WDWHFXVWRPHUV1<6'2+UHTXLUHVGLVFODLPHUVDQGTXDOLILHUVIRUYDULRXVYHUPLFXOLWHFRQWDLQLQJVDPSOHVWKDWGLUHFWDQDO\VLVYLD(/$3DQG

(/$3IRUVDPSOHVWKDWFRQWDLQ!YHUPLFXOLWHPLQHUDOZKHUH(/$3PD\EHXVHGWRHYDOXDWHWKHDVEHVWRVFRQWHQWRIWKHPDWHULDO+RZHYHUDQ\WHVWUHVXOW

XVLQJ(/$3ZLOOEHUHSRUWHGZLWKWKHIROORZLQJGLVFODLPHU3(/$3PHWKRGGRHVQRWUHPRYHYHUPLFXOLWHDQGPD\XQGHUHVWLPDWHWKHOHYHORIDVEHVWRVSUHVHQWLQ

DVDPSOHFRQWDLQLQJ!YHUPLFXOLWH ́



)XUWKHULQIRUPDWLRQRQWKLVPHWKRGDQGRWKHUYHUPLFXOLWHDQGDVEHVWRVLVVXHVFDQEHIRXQGDWWKHIROORZLQJ$JHQF\IRU7R[LF6XEVWDQFHVDQG'LVHDVH5HJLVWU\$76'5

ZZZDWVGUFGFJRY8QLWHG6WDWHV*HRORJLFDO6XUYH\86*6ZZZPLQHUDOVXVJVJRYPLQHUDOV86(3$ZZZHSDJRYDVEHVWRV7KH86(3$DOVRKDVDQLQIRUPDWLYH

EURFKXUH&XUUHQW%HVW3UDFWLFHVIRU9HUPLFXOLWH$WWLF,QVXODWLRQ(3$)0D\WKDWPD\DVVLVWWKHKHDOWKDQGUHPHGLDWLRQSURIHVVLRQDO1<6FXVWRPHUV

SOHDVHIROORZFXUUHQW1<6'2+(/$3UHTXLUHPHQWVSHUSROLF\RQVXEMHFWRIVXUIDFLQJDQGYHUPLFXOLWH0D\7HVWLQJ5HTXLUHPHQWVIRU6XUIDFLQJ0DWHULDO

&RQWDLQLQJ9HUPLFXOLWHKWWSVZZZZDGVZRUWKRUJVLWHVGHIDXOWILOHV:HE'RF,BBBSGI



7KHIROORZLQJLVDVXPPDU\RIWKHDQDO\WLFDOSURFHVVRXWOLQHVLQWKH(3$50HWKRG



$QDO\WLFDO6WHS0HWKRG,QLWLDO6FUHHQLQJE\3/0(3$5

5HTXLUHPHQWV&RPPHQWV0LQLPXPRIJRIVDPSOHaIRUPRVWVDPSOHV 

&RPPHUFH3DUNZD\6XLWH%

0W/DXUHO1HZ-HUVH\

7HOHSKRQH

(PDLOFXVWRPHUVHUYLFH#LDWOFRP

&(57,),&$7(2)$1$/<6,6

&OLHQW *HUNHQ(QYLURQPHQWDO(QWHUSULVHV,QF

:HVW0W9HUQRQ

6SULQJILHOG02

5HSRUW'DWH 

5HSRUW1R 3/0

3URMHFW 7HPSOH+DOO

3URMHFW1R 

&OLHQW *(5

'DWHG 3DJHRI
$QDO\WLFDO6WHS0HWKRG:HW6HSDUDWLRQE\3/0*UDYLPHWULF7HFKQLTXH(3$5

5HTXLUHPHQWV&RPPHQWV0LQLPXPJ

RIGU\VDPSOH$QDO\VLVRI6LQNVRQO\ 

$QDO\WLFDO6WHS0HWKRG:HW6HSDUDWLRQE\3/0*UDYLPHWULF7HFKQLTXH(3$5

5HTXLUHPHQWV&RPPHQWV0LQLPXPJ

RIGU\VDPSOH$QDO\VLVRI)ORDWVRQO\ 

$QDO\WLFDO6WHS0HWKRG:HW6HSDUDWLRQE\7(0*UDYLPHWULF7HFKQLTXH(3$5

5HTXLUHPHQWV&RPPHQWV0LQLPXPJ

RIGU\VDPSOH$QDO\VLVRI6LQNVRQO\ 

$QDO\WLFDO6WHS0HWKRG:HW6HSDUDWLRQE\7(0*UDYLPHWULF7HFKQLTXH(3$5

5HTXLUHPHQWV&RPPHQWV0LQLPXPJ

RIGU\VDPSOH$QDO\VLVRI6XVSHQVLRQRQO\


:LWKDGYDQFHQRWLFHDQGFRQILUPDWLRQE\WKHODERUDWRU\



$SSUR[LPDWHO\/LWHURIVDPSOHLQGRXEOHEDJJHGFRQWDLQHUa[LQFKEDJRIVDPSOH



1HZ<RUN6WDWH'HSDUWPHQWRI+HDOWKUHTXLUHVWKDWVDPSOHVRULJLQDWLQJIURP1<6WKDWWKH\FDWHJRUL]HDV1RQIULDEOH2UJDQLFDOO\%RXQGPDWHULDOVFDQRQO\EHFRQILUPHG

DV1RQH'HWHFWHGIRUDVEHVWRVE\PHWKRG6HHWKHWDEOHEHORZIRUDOLVWRIWKRVHPDWHULDOV(19,5210(17$//$%25$725<$33529$/352*5$0

&(57,),&$7,210$18$/,7(01R5HYLVLRQ'DWH




$VSKDOW6KLQJOHV&DXONLQJ&HLOLQJ7LOHVZLWK&HOOXORVH'XFW:UDS*OD]LQJ0DVWLF3DLQW&KLSV5HVLOLHQW)ORRU7LOHV5XEEHUL]HG$VEHVWRV*DVNHWV6LGLQJ6KLQJOHV

9LQ\O$VEHVWRV7LOH12%PDWHULDOVRWKHUWKDW609ZLWKYHUPLFXOLWH$Q\PDWHULDO)ULDEOHRU12%RWKHUWKDQ609ZLWK!YHUPLFXOLWH



6WDWLVWLFDOO\GHULYHGXQFHUWDLQW\ZLWKDQ\PHDVXUHVKRXOGEHWDNHQLQWRFRQVLGHUDWLRQZKHQUHYLHZLQJDQGLQWHUSUHWLQJDOOUHSRUWHGGDWDDQGUHVXOWV$PRUHFRPSUHKHQVLYH

OLVWLQJRIDFFXUDF\SUHFLVLRQDQGXQFHUWDLQW\DVLWLPSDFWVWKLVPHWKRGLVDYDLODEOHXSRQUHTXHVW

&RPPHUFH3DUNZD\6XLWH%

0W/DXUHO1HZ-HUVH\

7HOHSKRQH

(PDLOFXVWRPHUVHUYLFH#LDWOFRP

&(57,),&$7(2)$1$/<6,6

&OLHQW *HUNHQ(QYLURQPHQWDO(QWHUSULVHV,QF

:HVW0W9HUQRQ

6SULQJILHOG02

5HSRUW'DWH 

5HSRUW1R 3/0

3URMHFW 7HPSOH+DOO

3URMHFW1R 

&OLHQW *(5

'DWHG 3DJHRI
Chain of Custody

Work Area Location(s) 




Inspector Certification


LIMITED LEAD-BASED PAINT TESTING

Missouri State University – Science Building Temple Hall

910 S John Q Hammons Pkwy Springfield, MO 65897

Prepared For:

Greg Gerken

President 

1528 West Mount Vernon

Springfield, MO 65802

Date: March 13, 2023

Project Number: 923112 

Prepared By:

OCCU-TEC, Inc.

2604 NE Industrial Drive, Suite 230

North Kansas City, MO 64117

Phone: (816) 231-5580 

Fax: (816) 231-5641 

www.occutec.com
CONTENTS

Executive summary ................................................................................................................................. 1

Key Terms and Acronyms ...................................................................................................................... 2

1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3

2.0 Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 3

2.1 Lead-Based Paint ..................................................................................................................... 3

3.0 Investigation Results .................................................................................................................... 3

3.2 Lead-Based Paint Results ....................................................................................................... 3

4.0 Limitations of the Inspection ..................................................................................................... 4

5.0 Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 4

6.0 Signature(s) .................................................................................................................................... 4

7.0 References ..................................................................................................................................... 4

Appendices

Appendix A – Inspector Qualifications

Appendix B – XRF Analysis Results
Project No. 923112 – Page 1 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

OCCU-TEC, Inc. (OCCU-TEC) completed limited lead-based paint testing of the 

scheduled construction area within Temple Hall located at 910 South John Q Hammons 

Parkway Springfield, MO 65897 at the request of Mr. Greg Gerken of Gerken 

Environmental (Gerken). The limited testing was completed within the subject room in 

preparation of planned renovation within the space.

The testing was completed by Mr. Justin Arnold of OCCU-TEC on March 9th, 2023, in 

general accordance with the requirements set forth by the United States Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA), Missouri Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS), 

and local regulations as applicable.

OCCU-TEC utilized an X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Analyzer to determine if lead-based paint 

was present within the subject area. OCCU-TEC analyzed painted and coated surfaces 

in general accordance with MDHSS requirements. The yellow handrail on the first floor 

was confirmed to be a lead-containing component, no other lead-containing painted 

building materials were identified within the subject area. 

This executive summary has been prepared to provide a brief outline of the activities 

completed during the investigation and a general overview of the results of the 

investigation. Additional detail regarding the methodology and results of the 

investigation are included the subsequent report. The report should be read in its entirety 

for a complete understanding of the investigation and results. 
Project No. 923112 – Page 2 

KEY TERMS AND ACRONYMS

EPA – United States Environmental Protection Agency

MDHHS – Missouri Department of Health and Human Services

AIHA – American Industrial Hygiene Association

HUD – United States Department of Housing and Urban Development

LBP – Lead-based Paint

XRF – X-Ray Fluorescent Analyzer

OSHA – Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Project No. 923112 – Page 3 

1.0 INTRODUCTION

On March 9th, 2023, Mr. Justin Arnold of OCCU-TEC completed a limited lead-based paint 

testing of the Temple Hall construction area (subject property) located at 910 South John 

Q Hammons Parkway Springfield, MO 65897. The testing was completed at the request 

of Mr. Greg Gerken of Gerken in preparation of planned renovation within the building 

and was limited to the exterior portions of the building noted on the attached drawings. 

2.0 METHODOLOGY

2.1 Lead-Based Paint

The limited lead-based paint testing was conducted in general accordance with all 

applicable state and local regulations. OCCU-TEC utilized an X-ray Florescence (XRF) 

Analyzer to determine if lead-based paint was present within the building.

XRF testing was conducted using Viken Detection Model Pb200i XRF detector, Serial 

#01098, General License #53-0720, utilizing a Cobalt - 57 radioisotope source with an 

activity level of 5.0 millicuries (mCi). XRF results are classified as positive if they are greater 

than or equal to the stated threshold for the instrument (1.0 mg/cm2), and negative if 

they are less than the threshold. 

The state of Missouri defines lead-based paint as any paint or other surface coating 

materials that contain lead equal to or in excess of 1.0 mg/cm2 or more than five-tenths 

percent by weight. The lead testing data (Appendix D-1) will show all components that 

were tested, components that were tested at or above 1.0 mg/cm2 are indicated by 

bold type and highlighted. If components are identified during renovation activities that 

were not tested, they too must be considered lead containing.

3.0 INVESTIGATION RESULTS

3.2 Lead-Based Paint Results

A material description and material locations of the lead-based paint identified at the 

Subject Property have been summarized below. It should be noted that samples taken 

at the site are representative of the material samples within the subject area. 

Table 3.2 Lead-Based Paint Results Summary

XRF Reading Material Material Location Material 

Description

Reading 

(mg/cm2) 

16 & 17 Metal 1st Floor Yellow Handrail 1.9 & 2.0

mg/cm2 = milligrams per centimeter squared. 
Project No. 923112 – Page 4 

4.0 LIMITATIONS OF THE INSPECTION

OCCU-TEC identified and tested painted surfaces from the survey area of the Subject 

Property that were accessible at the time of the inspection. Additionally, the lead-based 

paint testing was limited to only those areas of the building that would be impacted in 

the scheduled renovation as per the OSHA Lead in Construction Standard (29 CFR 

1926.62). This report should not be interpreted as a full HUD Lead-Based Paint Inspection 

or Risk Assessment.

This report is provided for the sole reliance by Gerken. Any reliance by other parties is 

prohibited without OCCU-TECs express written consent. If other parties are granted 

reliance on this report by OCCU-TEC, said parties are bound by the terms and conditions 

set forth in the original proposal.

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

If any materials are noted that may be disturbed during renovation that were not 

included during this assessment, they should be presumed to contain lead-based paint 

until sampling results indicate they are not considered LBP.

6.0 SIGNATURE(S)

OCCU-TEC appreciates the opportunity to provide Gerken with the above referenced 

professional services. If you have any questions regarding the contents of this report, 

please contact us at (816) 231-5580. Thank you for choosing OCCU-TEC.

Respectfully,

Kevin Heriford Justin Arnold, CIEC

Director EH&S Departments Project Manager (QA/QC)

7.0 REFERENCES

-Lead in Construction Standard - OSHA – 29 CFR §1926.62 
Project No. 923112 – Page 1 

APPENDICES
Project No. 923112 – Page 2 

APPENDIX A

INSPECTOR QUALIFICATIONS
snrE0Ftt880afrt

nEmfrrtEilr 0F ilHtIil ttD 88ffi0fr fiEfracEi

1HII OGGUPITIOII lIGTlI$t RTGISIRIIIOII

Issued to:

Justin E. Arnold

The person, firm or corporation whose name appears on this certificate has fulfilled

the requirements for licensure asi set forth in the Missouri Revised Statutes

701.300-701.338, as long as not suspended or revoked, and is hereby authorized to

engage in the activity listed below.

Lead Risk Assessor

Category of License

Issuance Date:

Expiration Date:

License Number:

611u2022

6mt2024

12061 1-3 00003622

?".,r*J. n*a"4.^"

Paula F. Nickelson

Acting Director

Departrnent of Health and Senior Services

Lead Licensing Program, PO Box 570, Jefferson City, MO 65102
Project No. 923112 – Page 3 

APPENDIX B

XRF ANALYSIS RESULTS
Company

Model

Type

Serial Num.

App Version

Job Id Reading # Concentration Units 3 SD Result Action Level Nom Sec Date Time User Mode Analytic Mode Floor 

923112 1 1 mg/cm2 0.2 Calibration 1 5 3/9/2023 9:54:22 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint

923112 2 0.9 mg/cm2 0.2 Calibration 1 5 3/9/2023 9:54:46 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint923112 3 0.9 mg/cm2 0.2 Calibration 1 5 3/9/2023 9:55:11 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint923112 4 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Calibration 1 2 3/9/2023 9:55:36 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint923112 5 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Calibration 1 2 3/9/2023 9:55:46 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint923112 6 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Calibration 1 2 3/9/2023 9:55:56 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint923112 7 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:03:24 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 

923112 8 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:04:08 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 

923112 9 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:04:58 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 

923112 10 0.4 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:05:20 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 923112 11 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:05:38 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 923112 12 0.1 mg/cm2 0.4 Negative 1 1 3/9/2023 10:05:59 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 923112 13 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:06:14 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 923112 14 0.1 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:06:31 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 923112 15 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:06:47 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 923112 16 2 mg/cm2 0.3 Positive 1 2 3/9/2023 10:07:05 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 

923112 17 1.9 mg/cm2 0.3 Positive 1 2 3/9/2023 10:07:30 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 923112 18 0.2 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:09:44 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 

923112 19 0.1 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:10:01 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 923112 20 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:10:49 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 

923112 21 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:11:06 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 

923112 22 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:11:42 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 923112 23 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:12:03 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 923112 24 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:12:34 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 

923112 25 0.2 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:13:16 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 

923112 26 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:13:38 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 

923112 27 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:13:53 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 923112 28 0.1 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:14:09 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 

923112 29 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:14:43 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 

923112 30 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:15:03 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 923112 31 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:15:45 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 

923112 32 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 1 3/9/2023 10:15:59 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 

923112 33 0.3 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:16:32 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 

923112 34 0.2 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 1 3/9/2023 10:17:06 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 

923112 35 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:17:31 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 923112 36 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:17:47 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 

923112 37 0.5 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:18:23 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 

923112 38 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:19:13 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 

923112 39 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:19:33 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 923112 40 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:20:10 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 

923112 41 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:20:26 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 923112 42 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:20:58 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 923112 43 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:21:19 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 923112 44 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:21:49 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 

923112 45 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 1 3/9/2023 10:22:05 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 

923112 46 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:22:29 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 

923112 47 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:23:00 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st 

923112 48 0.2 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:25:14 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st L

Lead Based Paint Inspection

Missouri State University ‐ Springfield

910 S John Q Hammons Pkwy Springfield, MO 65897

Viken

Pb200i

XRF Lead Paint Analyzer

1098

Pb200i‐REL‐4.0‐29

Black = Negative

Blue = Calibration/NullRed = Positive

Intact = Paint in good condition

Fair = below De minimis levels

Poor = Above De minimis levels 
Company

Model

Type

Serial Num.

App Version

Job Id Reading # Concentration Units 3 SD Result Action Level Nom Sec Date Time User Mode Analytic Mode Floor 

Lead Based Paint Inspection

Missouri State University ‐ Springfield

910 S John Q Hammons Pkwy Springfield, MO 65897

Viken

Pb200i

XRF Lead Paint Analyzer

1098

Pb200i‐REL‐4.0‐29

923112 49 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:25:33 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st L

923112 50 0.3 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:25:54 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st L923112 51 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:26:13 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st L923112 52 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 1 3/9/2023 10:26:32 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st L923112 53 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:26:47 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 1st L923112 54 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:29:03 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 2nd 

923112 55 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:30:38 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 2nd 

923112 56 0.7 mg/cm2 0.2 Negative 1 5 3/9/2023 10:31:05 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 2nd 923112 57 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:32:12 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 2nd 

923112 58 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:32:29 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 2nd 

923112 59 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:33:10 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 2nd 

923112 60 0.1 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:33:31 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 2nd 923112 61 0.1 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:35:03 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 2nd 923112 62 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:35:22 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 2nd 923112 63 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:35:50 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 2nd 923112 64 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:36:05 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 2nd 

923112 65 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:36:31 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 2nd 

923112 66 0.2 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:36:55 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 2nd 

923112 67 0.1 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:37:14 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 2nd 923112 68 0.9 mg/cm2 0.2 Negative 1 5 3/9/2023 10:37:44 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 2nd 

923112 69 0.1 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:39:31 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 2nd 

923112 70 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:39:41 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 2nd 923112 71 0.1 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:40:03 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 2nd 

923112 72 0.1 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:40:25 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 2nd 

923112 73 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:40:46 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 2nd 

923112 74 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:41:29 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 2nd 

923112 75 0.5 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:41:44 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 2nd 923112 76 0.5 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:41:58 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 2nd 

923112 77 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:45:17 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 3rd 

923112 78 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:45:36 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 3rd 923112 79 0.1 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:46:51 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 3rd 923112 80 0.5 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:47:06 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 3rd 923112 81 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:47:27 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 3rd 923112 82 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:48:45 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 3rd 

923112 83 0 mg/cm2 0.4 Negative 1 1 3/9/2023 10:49:05 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 3rd 

923112 84 0.3 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:49:36 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 3rd 

923112 85 0.1 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:50:24 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 3rd 

923112 86 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:50:52 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 3rd 

923112 87 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:52:12 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 3rd 923112 88 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:52:39 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 3rd 

923112 89 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:53:23 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 3rd 

923112 90 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:53:38 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 3rd 

923112 91 0.2 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:54:15 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 3rd 

923112 92 0.1 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:54:42 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 3rd 

923112 93 0.1 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:55:01 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 3rd 923112 94 0.1 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:56:51 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 3rd 923112 95 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:57:08 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 3rd 923112 96 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 10:57:39 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 3rd 

Black = Negative

Blue = Calibration/NullRed = Positive

Intact = Paint in good condition

Fair = below De minimis levels

Poor = Above De minimis levels 
Company

Model

Type

Serial Num.

App Version

Job Id Reading # Concentration Units 3 SD Result Action Level Nom Sec Date Time User Mode Analytic Mode Floor 

Lead Based Paint Inspection

Missouri State University ‐ Springfield

910 S John Q Hammons Pkwy Springfield, MO 65897

Viken

Pb200i

XRF Lead Paint Analyzer

1098

Pb200i‐REL‐4.0‐29

923112 97 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 11:01:24 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 4th 

923112 98 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 11:01:42 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 4th 

923112 99 0.1 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 11:02:00 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 4th 

923112 100 0.2 mg/cm2 0.3 Negative 1 2 3/9/2023 11:02:22 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 4th 

923112 101 0.9 mg/cm2 0.2 Calibration 1 5 3/9/2023 11:07:18 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 

923112 102 1 mg/cm2 0.2 Calibration 1 5 3/9/2023 11:07:47 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 923112 103 0.9 mg/cm2 0.2 Calibration 1 5 3/9/2023 11:08:09 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 923112 104 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Calibration 1 2 3/9/2023 11:08:41 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 923112 105 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Calibration 1 2 3/9/2023 11:08:54 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 923112 106 0 mg/cm2 0.3 Calibration 1 2 3/9/2023 11:09:05 Arnold Action Level Lead Paint 

Black = Negative

Blue = Calibration/NullRed = Positive

Intact = Paint in good condition

Fair = below De minimis levels

Poor = Above De minimis levels 




21 

APPENDIX E 

Section 106 Documents: 

Memorandum of Agreement which include: 

Map of Defined Project Area 

Letter from NIST dated 2/3/2023 determining eligibility and adverse affect 

Letter from SHPO dated 2/7/2023 concurring eligibility and adverse affect 

Correspondence from ACHP dated 3/9/23 declining participation 

Correspondence from Springfield Landmarks Board dated 3/2/23 acknowledging receipt of notice 

Correspondence from the Delaware Tribe Historic Preservation Office dated 3/31/23 language 

clarification 

Correspondence from the Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma dated 3/31/23 declining participation and 

notification request 
Page 1

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY, 

HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, THE MISSOURI STATE 

HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, AND MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY

REGARDING THE ADDITION TO TEMPLE HALL – MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY

910 SOUTH JOHN Q. HAMMONS PARKWAY

SPRINGFIELD, GREENE COUNTY, MISSOURI

WHEREAS, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the Health Resources 

and Services Administration (HRSA) intend to provide Congressionally delegated construction grants 

to fund the Addition to Temple Hall (undertaking) at Missouri State University (MSU); and 

WHEREAS, the undertaking was identified for funding under the Congressionally mandated NIST

and HRSA Construction Grants Program, which sought applications from Congressionally identified 

entities for “NIST Extramural Construction” projects to be funded by NIST that have been identified 

in the Joint Explanatory Statement accompanying the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, P.L. 

117-103; and 

WHEREAS, NIST will serve as the lead agency, acting on behalf of the Health Resources and Services 

Administration (HRSA) [pursuant to 36 CFR § 800.2(a)(2)], which also intends to provide a 

Congressionally delegated construction grant to fund the undertaking, whereby funding is limited to 

the named entities and for the purposes identified in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, P.L. 

117-103, for congressionally directed spending projects that relate to the construction and renovation 

(including equipment) of health care and other facilities; and 

WHEREAS, the undertaking consists of the construction of an addition to the northeast corner of 

Temple Hall (910 S. John Q. Hammons Parkway), to provide additional laboratory, office, and 

support space in the existing science building, whereby the addition would obscure the original east 

entrance and require demolition of portions of the north and east facades and removal of the 

original landscape features at the northeast corner of the building. The project provides interior 

renovations at the juncture with the addition and site work including underground site utilities, 

associated walks and landscaping, and exterior building repairs/modifications to existing building to 

facilitate the addition;

and 

WHEREAS, NIST has defined the Area of Potential Effect (APE) for direct effects as the historic 

site boundary of the building, which is the West Mall (formerly Lombard Street) on the north, the 

vacated Kings Avenue on the east, Belmont Street on the south, and John Q. Hammons Parkway 

(formerly Dollison Street) on the west (identified as Project Area on Appendix A); and 

WHEREAS, NIST has determined that the undertaking will have an adverse effect on Temple Hall, 

which is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion C in the area 

of Architecture, through the demolition of portions of the north and east facades at the northeast 

corner of the building, as well as the demolition of the landscape features at the northeast plaza to 

accommodate a new addition in that location (Appendix B); and 
Page 2

WHEREAS, NIST has consulted with the Missouri State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and 

prepared this Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) pursuant to 36 CFR § 800, the regulations 

implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. § 306108); and 

WHEREAS, in a letter dated 7 February 2023 (Appendix C), SHPO concurred that the undertaking 

will have an adverse effect on a historic resource (Temple Hall); and 

WHEREAS, NIST has consulted with Missouri State University (MSU) regarding the effects of the 

undertaking on historic properties and has invited them to sign this MOA as an invited signatory; 

and 

WHEREAS, the Vice President for Administrative Services or the University Architect and Director 

of Planning, Design and Construction be authorized to sign the agreement and perform those acts 

necessary to carry out and perform the terms of the agreement associated with the undertaking. 

With approval of the project budget, authorization is also provided to further sign agreements or 

amendments to existing agreements directly related to this project as long as the approved project 

budget is not exceeded; and

WHEREAS, in an electronic submittal dated 3 February 2023, NIST notified the Advisory Council 

on Historic Preservation (ACHP) of the adverse effect in accordance with 36 CFR § 800.6(a)(1); and 

in a letter dated 9 March 2023 (Appendix D), the ACHP chose not to participate in the consultation 

pursuant to 36 CFR § 800.6(a)(1)(iii); and 

WHEREAS, MSU has posted a public notice of the undertaking on its website 7 March 2023; and 

WHEREAS, in a letter dated 1 March 2023, NIST notified the Landmarks Board of the City of 

Springfield, Missouri, a Certified Local Government, of the adverse effect and inviting the 

Landmarks Board to participate as a consulting party in the preparation of this Memorandum of 

Agreement (MOA) in accordance with 36 CFR § 800; and in an email dated 2 March 2023

(Appendix E), the Landmarks Board of the City of Springfield, Missouri has chosen to participate in 

the consultation; and

WHEREAS, NIST has identified the Cherokee Nation, Delaware Nation, Delaware Tribe of 

Indians, Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma, Kickapoo Tribe in Kansas, Kickapoo Tribe of 

Oklahoma, Osage Nation, Shawnee Tribe, and United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in 

Oklahoma as federally recognized tribes with potential interest in Springfield, Missouri and pursuant 

to 36 CFR § 800.3, sent a letter on 1 March 2023, inviting all to participate as a consulting parties in 

the preparation of this Memorandum of Agreement (MOA); and 

WHEREAS, the Delaware Tribe of Indians participated in the consultation and proposed the 

revision of Stipulation I.3 to incorporate the perspective of the American Indian peoples who 

frequented the area prior to MSU’s acquisition of the site (Appendix F); and 

WHEREAS, in a letter dated 31 March 2023, the Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma did not object to the 

undertaking (Appendix F); and 
Page 3

WHEREAS, the following tribes, the Cherokee Nation, Delaware Nation, Eastern Shawnee Tribe of 

Oklahoma, Kickapoo Tribe in Kansas, Osage Nation, Shawnee Tribe, and United Keetoowah Band 

of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma, did not respond to the notice nor participate in the Consulting 

Parties meeting; and

NOW, THEREFORE, NIST, HRSA, SHPO and MSU agree that the undertaking shall be 

implemented in accordance with the following stipulations in order to take into account the effect of 

the undertaking on historic properties. 

STIPULATIONS

NIST shall ensure that the following measures are carried out to mitigate the adverse effects: 

I. Documentation

1. Prior to initiation of demolition and renovation activities, MSU will contract with a 

36CFR61 qualified Historian or Architectural Historian (consultant) who will complete 

the recordation report which will include the following: 

a. At least ten (10) 8” x 10” black and white photographs of the building. These will 

be exterior and interior photographs including views of each façade and significant 

architectural details. Photographs should include representative views of 

architectural details, and other significant features of the property including interior 

features listed as significant in the third whereas clause. The photo submission will 

include photographs printed on archival-stable paper, labeled on the back with soft 

lead pencil, an archival CD with the original color .TIF images, and photo key and 

map documenting the location and direction of each photo all of which meet the 

National Register Photo Policy Standards; 

b. A legible scale archival copy of the historic plans; 

c. A sketch site plan; 

d. A narrative description of the building; and 

e. A narrative report detailing the history of the building, its designer/builder, and 

use. This report shall establish the significance of the building and place it in 

context with the history and development of the university as appropriate. The 

research shall utilize historic source material including but not limited to maps, 

drawings, newspapers, and oral history if available.
Page 4

f. The recordation report shall be submitted in draft form to the SHPO for review 

and comment. The SHPO will comment on the adequacy of the report within 

thirty (30) days of receipt or will be seen as accepting the report.

g. Once comments, if any, are received from the SHPO, MSU will produce three

physical and digital copies of the narrative building description and report, 

photographs, and floor and site plans. One copy will be provided to the SHPO and 

the others will be provided to the MSU Archives and the State Historical Society of 

Missouri. 

2. MSU may submit the physical documentation in a digital format (photographs, floor 

plans, and site plans) for acceptance in advance of the narrative report (Stipulations I.a.

to c.); selective demolition may proceed upon written notification by the SHPO after 

physical documentation has been reviewed. The SHPO will have thirty (30) days from 

receipt to review and comment on the physical documentation or will be seen as 

accepting it and demolition/removal may proceed. 

3. In consultation with MSU, its federal partners, and SHPO, the Consultant shall 

develop an interpretive history display regarding the history of the historic property 

that will be installed in the property by MSU once renovations are complete. The 

history shall present the perspectives of the American Indian peoples who frequented 

the area prior to the founding of the State, City, and University, the development and 

history of the building and its connection to the university and the brutalist 

architectural movement; and describe what events occurred through photographs and 

other visual interpretation. The display shall include, but not be limited to, text, 

images, and historic photographs. MSU shall submit a draft of the proposed display to 

SHPO for review and comment prior to its installation in Temple Hall. The SHPO 

shall have thirty (30) days from receipt to review and comment on the draft display. 

II. Duration – This MOA will expire if its terms are not carried out within five (5) years from the 

date of its execution. Prior to such time, NIST may consult with the other signatories to 

reconsider the terms of the MOA and amend it in accordance with Stipulation V

(Amendments) below.

III. Unanticipated Discoveries – In the event that archeological materials are encountered, work 

shall be halted and NIST and SHPO shall consult on procedures to follow to determine the 

Register eligibility of archaeological resources and to evaluate the adverse effects of the Project 

on such resources. For sites of Native American origin, this consultation shall include the 

Cherokee Nation, Delaware Nation, Delaware Tribe of Indians, Eastern Shawnee Tribe of 

Oklahoma, Kickapoo Tribe in Kansas, Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma, Osage Nation, Shawnee 

Tribe, and United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma. 
Page 5

1. NIST shall consult with the SHPO to develop and evaluate alternatives or modifications 

to the undertaking that could avoid, minimize or mitigate project adverse effects on 

archaeological sites eligible for the National Register.

2. NIST shall ensure that a determination, finding, or agreement is supported by sufficient 

documentation to enable any reviewing parties to understand its basis. 

3. If human remains are discovered at any time during the implementation of this Project, 

the university shall follow the provisions of the Native American Graves Protection and 

Repatriation Act (25 USC Section 3001) and Missouri Unmarked Human Burial Sites 

Act, §194.400 - 194.410, RSMo as appropriate.

IV. Dispute Resolution – Should any signatory to this MOA object at any time to any actions 

proposed or the manner in which the terms of this MOA are implemented, NIST shall consult 

with such party to resolve the objection. If NIST determines such objection cannot be 

resolved, NIST will:

1. Forward all documentation relevant to the dispute, including NIST’s proposed 

resolution, to the ACHP. The ACHP shall provide NIST with its advice on the 

resolution within thirty (30) days of receiving adequate documentation. Prior to reaching 

a final decision on the dispute, NIST shall prepare a written response that takes into 

account any timely advice or comments regarding the dispute from ACHP, signatories, 

and consulting parties, and provide them with a copy of this written response. NIST will 

then proceed according to its final decision. 

2. If the ACHP does not provide its advice regarding the dispute within the thirty (30) day 

time period, NIST may make a final decision on the dispute and proceed accordingly. 

Prior to reaching such a final decision, NIST shall prepare a written response that takes 

into account any timely comments regarding the dispute from the signatories and 

concurring parties to the MOA, and provide them and the ACHP with a copy of such 

written response. 

3. NIST’s responsibility to carry out all other actions subject to the terms of this MOA that 

are not the subject of the dispute remain unchanged. 

V. Amendments – This MOA may be amended when such an amendment is agreed to in writing 

by all signatories. The amendment will be effective on the date a copy signed by all of the 

signatories is filed with the ACHP. 

VI. Termination – If any signatory to this MOA determines that its terms will not or cannot be 

carried out, that party shall immediately consult with the other signatories to attempt to 

develop an amendment per Stipulation V, above. If within thirty (30) days (or another time 

period agreed to by all signatories) an amendment cannot be reached, any signatory may 

terminate the MOA upon written notification to the other signatories. 

Once the MOA is terminated, and prior to work continuing on the undertaking, NIST must 

either (a) execute an MOA pursuant to 36 CFR § 800.6 or (b) request, take into account, and 
Page 6

respond to the comments of the ACHP under 36 CFR § 800.7. NIST shall notify the 

signatories as to the course of action it will pursue. 

VII. ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE

Each party agrees a person may execute this document by electronic symbol or process 

attached to or logically associated with the document, with an intent to sign the document and 

by a method that must include a feature to verify the identity of the signer and the authenticity 

of the document, commonly referred to as verified electronic signature. Each party further 

agrees to accept in-person signature with ink for such party who agrees, but does not wish to 

or have access to adequate technology to sign electronically. 

VIII. COUNTERPARTS

This document may be signed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an 

original for all purposes, and all of which when taken together shall be considered one and the 

same agreement.

IX. EXECUTION

NIST shall submit an executed copy of this Memorandum of Agreement and supporting 

documentation, pursuant to 36 CFR 800.11(f), to the ACHP and all signatories prior to 

approving the undertaking. 

Execution of this MOA by NIST and SHPO and implementation of its terms evidence that NIST

has taken into account the effects of this undertaking on historic properties and afforded the ACHP 

an opportunity to comment. 
Page 7

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY, 

HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, THE MISSOURI STATE 

HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, AND MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY

REGARDING THE ADDITION TO TEMPLE HALL – MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY

910 SOUTH JOHN Q. HAMMONS PARKWAY

SPRINGFIELD, GREENE COUNTY, MISSOURI

Signed: 

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY (NIST)

______________________________________________________________________________ 

By: Phillip W. Neuberg, FAIA Date:

NIST Federal Preservation Officer

April 5, 2023
Page 8

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY, 

HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, THE MISSOURI STATE 

HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, AND MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY

REGARDING THE ADDITION TO TEMPLE HALL – MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY

910 SOUTH JOHN Q. HAMMONS PARKWAY

SPRINGFIELD, GREENE COUNTY, MISSOURI

Signed: 

MISSOURI STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER

__________________________________________________04/07/2023__________________ 

By: Brian Stith Date:

Deputy Director Division of State Parks and

Deputy Missouri State Historic Preservation Officer
Page 9

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY, 

HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, THE MISSOURI STATE 

HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER, AND MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY

REGARDING THE ADDITION TO TEMPLE HALL – MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY

910 SOUTH JOHN Q. HAMMONS PARKWAY

SPRINGFIELD, GREENE COUNTY, MISSOURI

Signed: 

HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (HRSA)

 4/7/2023

______________________________________________________________________________ 

By: Julia H. Bryan, DPA, MPH, CHES Date:

Captain, U.S. Public Health Service

Director, Office of Special Activities

Office of Federal Assistance Management

 Health Resources and Services Administration 

Appendix A – Project Area
Appendix B – NIST Letter to SHPO

3 February 2023
3 February 2023

Dr. Toni Prawl

State Historic Preservation Officer

Missouri Department of Natural Resources

Post Office Box 176

Jefferson City, MO65102-0176

Re: Addition to Temple Hall at Missouri State University – SHPO project #008-GR-23 

Dear Dr. Prawl,

In accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and its

implementing regulations, 36 CFR Part 800, the National Institute of Standards and 

Technology (NIST) is providing information for your review regarding the abovereferenced project that involves congressionally mandated federal funding to be provided 

by NIST and by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) for an 

addition to Temple Hall, a Brutalist styled structure built in 1971 and recently determined 

eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places for local significance under 

Criterion C (See attached communication from NIST to MSU and from SHPO to MSU). 

For the purpose of this Undertaking, NIST shall serve as the lead Federal Agency [36 CFR 

800.2(2)]. Based upon our documentary research and our joint on-site evaluation of the 

property on 30 January 2023, the Area of Potential Effect (APE) or boundary of the 

project undertaking has been defined as that depicted on the original Planting Plan by the 

architects Kivett & Myers (see attached drawing). As such, and in accordance with the 

implementing regulations for Section 106 found at 36 CFR Part 800, we are seeking your 

comments on our APE delineation and your concurrence on our finding of Adverse 

Effect

Project Summary

The proposed Undertaking involves an addition to the northeast of the original building 

perimeter and within the existing exterior plaza which serves as a transitional, sunken entry 

plaza to the scientific research facility. The project will be located vicinity of 901 South 

National, Springfield MO, 65897 at Temple Hall, 910 South John Q. Hammons Parkway, 

Springfield 65897. Sensitively designed to provide a much needed additional 72,000 

(approximate) square feet of scientific research space by BNIM Architects, and in 

consultation Tom Nelson, Temple Hall’s original architect at Kivett & Myers, the proposed 

design expresses a sophisticated understanding of the stylistic motifs that characterize the 

original design. Nonetheless, in order to integrate the avoid subsurface utility chases located 

to the south placement of the four story addition to the north and east demolishes the original 

landscaped entry plaza as well as an original lecture hall lobby and limited elements of the 

façade. Despite the fact that the overall design of the new addition comports otherwise with 
2023 February 2

Dr. Toni Prawl

SHPO Missouri

` 

2 

principles of the Secretary of the of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic 

Structures (SOI Stds), the unavoidable removal of the original landscape entry plaza as well 

as the lecture hall lobby and elements of the facades in this location collectively constitute 

alterations to character defining features. Because these character defining features are being 

so affected, NIST believes that the Undertaking has the potential to have an Adverse 

Effect as defined in 36 CFR 800.5(a) 

We request your concurrence or non-concurrence with the assessment of Adverse Effect

within 30 days. If you concur with the assessment NIST, in consultation with our grant 

federal partner at HRSA and the MSU shall prepare a Draft Memorandum of Agreement

(MOA) that more specifically details the terms of the mitigation measure and the 

corresponding time frame for discussion with NIST, HRSA, MSU, and your office. By copy 

of this correspondence to Mr. Chris Wilson, we are informing the ACHP of our Adverse 

Effect determination and inviting them to participate in the forthcoming MOA

If you have any questions or would like to discuss the project further, please contact me at

phillip.neuberg@nist.gov or Mr. Robert Slocum at Robert.slocum@nist.gov

Sincerely,

Phillip W. Neuberg, FAIA 

Federal Historic Preservation Officer

Office of Facilities and Property Management

Enclosures: 1) SHPO Section 106 Project Review Form; 2) Campus Map showing Temple Hall, 3) Site Plan 

from original drawing, 4) photos of the existing Tempe Hall and renderings of the proposed Northeast Addition

Cc: all via email and with enclosures: Mr. Chris Wilson, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, Robert 

Slocum, NIST; Keith Kizzie, and Julia Bryan, HRSA; Mark White, Laura Jean Derrick, and Matt Morris all of MSU; 

Mike Sutherland, MO DNR
Campus Map showing Temple Hall in Context

4 | Missouri State University | Renovation and Addition to Temple Hall - College of Natural and Applied Sciences
Site Plan from Original Drawings

SHPO PROJECT NUMBER 008-GR-23 | 5
Existing condition from Northeast

Existing condition from Northwest

6 | Missouri State University | Renovation and Addition to Temple Hall - College of Natural and Applied Sciences
Rendering of Proposed Addition from Northeast

Rendering of Proposed Addition from Northwest

SHPO PROJECT NUMBER 008-GR-23 | 7
8 | Missouri State University | Renovation and Addition to Temple Hall - College of Natural and Applied Sciences
Existing view from northeast

Existing view from north

SHPO PROJECT NUMBER 008-GR-23 | 9
Appendix C – SHPO letter to NIST

7 February 2023


Appendix D – Correspondence from ACHP

9 March 2023
From: Neuberg, Phillip W. (Fed)

To: Rachel Consolloy; Derrick, Laura J

Cc: Slocum, Robert J. Mr. (Fed)

Subject: FW: [External] FW: Section 106 - Final MOA Draft

Date: Thursday, March 9, 2023 9:54:46 AM

Attachments: image001.png

Rachel,

Please take a copy of the email below as the insert for Appendix D on the MOA

Phillip W. Neuberg, FAIA

Architect & Federal Preservation Officer

 301-975-6940 desk

 202-309-4287 cell

 Phillip.neuberg@nist.gov

From: Christopher Wilson <cwilson@achp.gov> 

Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2023 10:51 AM

To: Neuberg, Phillip W. (Fed) <phillip.neuberg@nist.gov>

Subject: Re: [External] FW: Section 106 - Final MOA Draft

Phillip:

The ACHP will not be participating in this Temple Hall, Missouri MOA Section 106 case as it does not

appear to trigger our appendix A criteria in our regulations.

If you need any further clarification, please contact me directly.

Thank you,

Chris Wilson

NIST Case Manager

Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
Appendix E – Correspondence from Landmarks Board

2 March 2023
From: Sparlin, Michael

To: Rachel Consolloy; Phillip.neuberg@nist.gov

Subject: RE: Consulting Parties Notification Letter

Date: Thursday, March 2, 2023 2:11:00 PM

Attachments: image001.png

image002.png

Hi Phillip and Rachel,

Thank you for sending this. I’d like to attend the meeting as the staff liaison for the Landmarks

Board. I’ll forward your letter to the Board and reply with any members that would like to attend.

I have a personal connection to Temple Hall, as I spent many hours at Temple earning my degree!

Michael Sparlin, Senior City Planner

City of Springfield, Missouri

Planning & Development Department

Development Review Office

417.864.1091

From: Rachel Consolloy <rachel@rosinpreservation.com> 

Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 5:38 PM

To: Sparlin, Michael <msparlin@springfieldmo.gov>

Cc: Slocum, Robert J. (Fed) <robert.slocum@nist.gov>; Blackmon, James Michael (Fed)

<mike.blackmon@nist.gov>; Kizzie, Keith (HRSA) <KKizzie@hrsa.gov>; Bryan, Julia (HRSA)

<JBryan@hrsa.gov>; Rubingh, Amy <amy.rubingh@dnr.mo.gov>; Stith, Brian

<brian.stith@dnr.mo.gov>; Prawl, Toni <toni.prawl@dnr.mo.gov>; Hackworth, Michel K

<MHackworth@MissouriState.edu>; Wheeler, Mark S <MarkWheeler@MissouriState.edu>; Morris,

Matthew D <MattMorris@MissouriState.edu>; Derrick, Laura J <ljderrick@missouristate.edu>;

Alyssa Parsons <aparsons@bnim.com>; Josh Harrold <jharrold@bnim.com>; Laura Lesniewski

<LLesniewski@bnim.com>

Subject: Consulting Parties Notification Letter

**CAUTION** This email originated from outside the organization. Do not open attachments or

click links from sources you do not know and trust.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Mr. Sparlin,

As the federal preservation officer of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, I have

delegated Ms. Rachel Consolloy to send this email on my behalf because of your interest in historic

preservation.

Please find attached an invitation to participate in the development of the above referenced Section

106 Consultation for Temple Hall located at the Missouri State University in Springfield, MO. The

attached letter includes details of the consultation, particular determination of effects for the
proposed Undertaking, proposed Memorandum of Agreement, and Consulting Parties Meeting

scheduled for later this month. Should you have any questions or require further information, email

me at the address shown below.

Sincerely,

Phillip W. Neuberg, FAIA

Architect & Federal Preservation Officer

 301-975-6940 desk

 202-309-4287 cell

 Phillip.neuberg@nist.gov

Rachel Consolloy

1712 Holmes Street

Kansas City, Missouri 64108

816.472.4950 | D: 816.800.0473

rosinpreservation.com

Let's be friends on Facebook. Follow me on Instagram! Let's connect on LinkedIn
Appendix F – Correspondence from Tribes
From: Rachel Consolloy

To: Rachel Consolloy

Subject: FW: Dleaware Tribe Comments

Date: Friday, March 31, 2023 4:35:10 PM

Attachments: image001.png

image713464.png

Rachel Consolloy

1712 Holmes Street

Kansas City, Missouri 64108

816.472.4950 | D: 816.800.0473

rosinpreservation.com

From: Susan Bachor <sbachor@DelawareTribe.onmicrosoft.com> 

Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 12:57 PM

To: Neuberg, Phillip W. (Fed) <phillip.neuberg@nist.gov>; Derrick, Laura J

<LJDerrick@MissouriState.edu>; Kizzie, Keith (HRSA) <KKizzie@hrsa.gov>; Rubingh, Amy

<Amy.Rubingh@dnr.mo.gov>; Slocum, Robert J. Mr. (Fed) <robert.slocum@nist.gov>; Bush, Crystal

(HRSA) <CBush@hrsa.gov>

Cc: Hackworth, Michel K <MHackworth@MissouriState.edu>; Jeremy Johnson

<jeremyjohnson@delawaretribe.org>

Subject: Re: Dleaware Tribe Comments

CAUTION: External Sender

. The history shall present themes such as stories the perspectives of the Native American Indian

peoples who frequented the area prior to the State, City and University’s founding,

Some further edits.

Susan Bachor, M.A.

Deputy THPO & Archaeologist

Delaware Tribe Historic Preservation

126 University Circle

Stroud Hall, Rm. 437 

East Stroudsburg PA 18301

cell-1.539.529.1671

sbachor@delawaretribe.org- electronic submissions preferred

Please call for appointment.

This electronic message contains information from the Delaware Tribe of Indians

that may be confidential, privileged or proprietary in nature. The information is

intended solely for the specific use of the individual or entity to which this is

addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are notified that

any use, distribution, copying, or disclosure of this communication is strictly

prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender then

delete this message.
From: Neuberg, Phillip W. (Fed) <phillip.neuberg@nist.gov>

Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 1:19 PM

To: Derrick, Laura J <LJDerrick@MissouriState.edu>; Susan Bachor

<sbachor@DelawareTribe.onmicrosoft.com>; Kizzie, Keith (HRSA) <KKizzie@hrsa.gov>; Rubingh,

Amy <Amy.Rubingh@dnr.mo.gov>; Slocum, Robert J. Mr. (Fed) <robert.slocum@nist.gov>; Bush,

Crystal (HRSA) <CBush@hrsa.gov>

Cc: Hackworth, Michel K <MHackworth@MissouriState.edu>

Subject: RE: Dleaware Tribe Comments

Please note I have slightly revised the wording, while keeping the intent of Susan’s request -- as

shown below

“In consultation with MSU, its federal partners, and SHPO, the Consultant shall develop

an interpretive history display regarding the history of the historic property that will be

installed in the property by MSU once renovations are complete. The history shall present

themes such as stories of the Native American peoples who frequented the area prior to

the State, City and University’s founding, the development and history of the building

and its connection to the university and the brutalist architectural movement; and describe

what . . .”

 

Phillip W. Neuberg, FAIA

Architect & Federal Preservation Officer

 301-975-6940 desk

 202-309-4287 cell

 Phillip.neuberg@nist.gov

From: Derrick, Laura J <LJDerrick@MissouriState.edu> 

Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 11:43 AM

To: Neuberg, Phillip W. (Fed) <phillip.neuberg@nist.gov>; Susan Bachor

<sbachor@DelawareTribe.onmicrosoft.com>; Kizzie, Keith (HRSA) <KKizzie@hrsa.gov>; Rubingh,

Amy <Amy.Rubingh@dnr.mo.gov>; Slocum, Robert J. Mr. (Fed) <robert.slocum@nist.gov>; Bush,

Crystal (HRSA) <CBush@hrsa.gov>

Cc: Hackworth, Michel K <MHackworth@MissouriState.edu>

Subject: RE: Dleaware Tribe Comments

Susan,

I agree with Phillip, this is a great suggestion!
Below is the suggested language we will include in the MOA.

Please let us know if this is adequate.

Also, would your or someone from the Delaware Tribe be interested in working with us on this piece

of the interpretive display?

Thank you!

Laura

In consultation with MSU, its federal partners, and SHPO, the Consultant shall

develop an interpretive history display regarding the history of the historic property

that will be installed in the property by MSU once renovations are complete. The

history shall present themes such as the stories of the Native American peoples who

frequented the area prior to their 1830 removal, subsequent development and

history of the building and its connection to the university and the brutalist

architectural movement; and describe what events occurred through photographs

and other visual interpretation. The display shall include, but not be limited to, text,

images, and historic photographs. MSU shall submit a draft of the proposed display

to SHPO for review and comment prior to its instillation in Temple Hall. The

SHPO shall have thirty (30) days from receipt to review and comment on the draft

display.

Laura Jean Derrick, csi, aia

Project Manager - Architect

Planning, Design & Construction

Missouri State University

901 S. National Ave.

Springfield, MO 65897

Phone: 417-836-7625 | Fax: 417-836-6884 

ljderrick@missouristate.edu | www.missouristate.edu

From: Neuberg, Phillip W. (Fed) <phillip.neuberg@nist.gov> 

Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2023 2:48 PM

To: Susan Bachor <sbachor@DelawareTribe.onmicrosoft.com>; Derrick, Laura J

<LJDerrick@MissouriState.edu>; Kizzie, Keith (HRSA) <KKizzie@hrsa.gov>; Rubingh, Amy

<Amy.Rubingh@dnr.mo.gov>; Slocum, Robert J. Mr. (Fed) <robert.slocum@nist.gov>; Bush, Crystal

(HRSA) <CBush@hrsa.gov>

Subject: Re: Dleaware Tribe Comments

CAUTION: External Sender

That is an excellent suggestion. Let me pass that on to the university and others involved in the MOA

development. There could be an acknowledgement of the region's original inhabitants and/or

peoples who frequented the area where Temple Hall now sits. Thank you so much Susan.
Phil Neuberg

From: Susan Bachor <sbachor@DelawareTribe.onmicrosoft.com>

Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2023 2:30:27 PM

To: Neuberg, Phillip W. (Fed) <phillip.neuberg@nist.gov>

Subject: Dleaware Tribe Comments

Hè (hi) Phillip.

In the interpretation of the new space and its history is their a thought to the tribal nations

that were here before?

Susan Bachor, M.A.

Deputy THPO & Archaeologist

Delaware Tribe Historic Preservation

126 University Circle

Stroud Hall, Rm. 437 

East Stroudsburg PA 18301

cell-1.539.529.1671

sbachor@delawaretribe.org- electronic submissions preferred

Please call for appointment.

This electronic message contains information from the Delaware Tribe of Indians

that may be confidential, privileged or proprietary in nature. The information is

intended solely for the specific use of the individual or entity to which this is

addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are notified that

any use, distribution, copying, or disclosure of this communication is strictly

prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender then

delete this message.

This message originated outside Missouri State University. Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking

links, or replying.
Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma 

 P.O. Box 70 Administration Department

McLoud, Oklahoma 74851 Phone: 405-964-7053 Fax: 405-964-7065

Darwin Kaskaske Everett Suke T. Sunny Downs Evel Green

 PEMOETAMOA MOKITANOA KAKACHIIA KOKIPAUNACUA

 CHAIRMAN VICE-CHAIRMAN SECRETARY TREASURER COUNCILPERSON

March 31, 2023

Phillip W. Neuburg

Architect and Federal Preservation Officer

Phillip W. Neuburg <Phillip.neuberg@nist.gov>

RE: Section 106- Temple Hall- Missouri State University 910 South John Q. Hammons Parkway 

Springfield, Greene County, Missouri

To Whom It May Concern,

Thank you for consulting with the Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma regarding the above referenced project. 

Currently, the Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma has no objection to the construction addition of Temple Hall at 

Missouri State University 910 South John Q. Hammons Parkway Springfield, Greene County, Missouri.

However, in the event burial remains and/or artifacts are discovered during the development or construction 

process, the Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma would ask for immediate notification of such findings.

Should I be of any further assistance, please contact me at (405) 964-4227, ext.2306.

Sincerely,

Susan Tiger

Susan Tiger, Self-Governance, 

Transportation, NAGPRA

Admin. Assistant

Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma

A: 105365 OK 102

P: (405) 964-4227 ex. 2306 M: (405) 434-2866

E: susan.tiger@okkt.net

cc: NAGPRA Consulting File