Affirm and Opinion Filed January 29, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05-12-01621-CR No. 05-12-01622-CR
JOSHUA DESEAN PULLIAM -ROBERTS, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Crimin al District Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F12-34121-J, F12-34219-J 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices FitzGerald, Lang, and Fillmore Opinion by Justice FitzGerald Joshua Desean Pulliam-Roberts waived a ju ry and pleaded guilty to continuous sexual abuse of a young child and aggrav ated sexual assault of a child younger than fourteen years. See
T EX
. P ENAL C ODE A NN
. §§ 21.02(b), (h), 22.021(a)(1)(B) (Wes t Supp. 2013). The trial court assessed punishment at life imprisonment in each case. The trial court’s judgments also include orders that appellant pay $244 an d $590 in court costs, respectively In tw o issues, appellant contends there is insufficient evidence in the reco rd to support the orders that he pay court costs in each case. We affirm the trial court’s judgments.‐ 2 ‐ Appellant contends the evidence is insufficient to support the trial court’s judgments that appellant pay $244 and $590 in court costs because the clerk’s records do not contain bills of costs. The State responds that the record contains sufficient evidence to support the amount of costs assessed by the trial court in each case. If a criminal action is appealed, “an officer of the cour t shall certify and sign a bill of costs stating the costs that have been accrued and send the bill of costs to the court to which the action or proceeding is . . . appealed.” T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN
. art. 103.006 (West 2006). Costs may not be collected from the person charge d with the costs until a written bill, containing the items of cost, is produced and signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer entitled to receive pa yment for the cost. Id . art. 103.001. The clerk’s record in each case does not contai n a copy of the bill of costs. We, however, ordered the Dallas County District Clerk to file supplemental reco rds containing certified bills of costs associated with these cases, and the clerk did so. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 34.5(c)(1) (rules of appellate procedure allow supplemen tation of clerk’s record if rele vant items have been omitted). Appellant’s complaint that the evidence is insuffi cient to support the imposition of costs because the clerk’s records did not contain bills of costs is now moot. See Coronel v. State , No. 05-12- 00493-CR, 2013 WL 3874446, at *4 (Tex. App .––Dallas July 29, 2013, pet. ref’d); Franklin v.
State , 402 S.W.3d 894, 895 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2013, no pet.). We overrule his two issues. In response to the Court’s order requiring supp lementation of the records, appellant filed objections that the bills of costs in the supplemen tal records are not “prope r bill[s] of costs” and the bills of costs were not filed in the trial court or brought to th e trial court’s attention before costs were entered into the judgments. The C ourt rejected these objections and arguments in Coronel

. See Coronel , 2013 WL 3874446, at *4–5. We likewise reject them here, and conclude‐ 3 ‐ the cost bills contained in the supplemental clerk’s records are sufficient to support the assessment of costs in the judgments. See id . We overrule all of appe llant’s objections to the supplemental clerk’s records. We affirm the trial court’s judgments.

Do Not Publish T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47 121621F.U05

/Kerry P. FitzGerald/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD JUSTICE‐ 4 ‐ 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

JUDGMENT

JOSHUA DESEAN PULLIAMROBERTS, Appellant
No. 05-12-01621-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F12-34121-J). Opinion delivered by Justice FitzGerald, Justices Lang and Fillmore participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED

.

Judgment entered January 29, 2014

/Kerry P. FitzGerald/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD JUSTICE‐ 5 ‐ 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

JUDGMENT

JOSHUA DESEAN PULLIAMROBERTS, Appellant
No. 05-12-01622-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F12-34219-J). Opinion delivered by Justice FitzGerald, Justices Lang and Fillmore participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED

.

Judgment entered January 29, 2014

/Kerry P. FitzGerald/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD JUSTICE