EXHIBIT 4

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 317-4 Filed: 07/02/21 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:7200
1

From: Stephen Vegh <svegh@veghlaw.com> 

Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 5:14 PM 

To: Danielle McKinley <dmckinley@rmpartnerslaw.com> 

Cc: Christopher Binns <cbinns@loeb.com> 

Subject: Re: Hangzhou v. The Partnerships (Case No. 1:20-cv-04806)

This email originated from outside of Loeb's Networ k. Hi Danielle, Monday or Tuesday at 1p PT/3p CT wor ks for me. Thanks for setting u p the call. Steve Quoting Danielle McKinley <dmckinley @rmpartnerslaw.com>: Hi, Chris. Followin g up on t 

This email originated from outside of Loeb's Network.

Hi Danielle, Monday or Tuesday at 1p PT/3p CT works for me. Thanks for setting up the call. Steve 

Quoting Danielle McKinley <dmckinley@rmpartnerslaw.com>: 

Hi, Chris. Following up on the status of the product pages. Additionally, do you have time to meet and 

confer with Steve and I early next week? We would like to discuss potentially stipulating to a 

modification of the preliminary injunction. Otherwise, we may have to seek court intervention. Right 

now Monday afternoon is pretty open for me as well as Tuesday afternoon. If you and Steve can chime 

in with your availability that would be great.

 

 

 

 

Thanks!

 

Danielle

 

 

 

 

Danielle S. McKinley 

 

P: 312.251.2292 • E: dmckinley@rmpartnerslaw.com 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 317-4 Filed: 07/02/21 Page 2 of 13 PageID #:7201
2

305 N. Peoria Street, Suite 200, Chicago, Illinois 60607 

 

 

 

 

 

From: Christopher Binns <cbinns@loeb.com> 

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 4:14 PM 

To: Danielle McKinley <dmckinley@rmpartnerslaw.com> 

Cc: Patricia Earley <pearley@rmpartnerslaw.com> 

Subject: RE: Hangzhou v. The Partnerships (Case No. 1:20-cv-04806)

 

 

 

 

Hi Danielle, 

 

 

 

 

My apologies for the delay. The stores mentioned below can be broken into two categories: (1) stores 

named in the case on Schedule A; and (2) stores that we believe are related and were discovered after 

filing the complaint. The product pages are forthcoming.

 

 

 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 317-4 Filed: 07/02/21 Page 3 of 13 PageID #:7202
3

Category 1: 

 

 

 

 

• Runchengyun 

 

• Jiangyou-US 

 

• Tomoloo-NX 

 

 

 

 

Category 2: 

 

• Gyroor 

 

• Fengchi-US 

 

• Urbanmax 

 

• HGSM-US 

 

• GaodeshangUS 

 

• Tomoloo-AOX 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 317-4 Filed: 07/02/21 Page 4 of 13 PageID #:7203
4

 

 

 

 

As for Gyroshoes, this store was named in a separate case in the Northern District (20-cv-5905), but 

we have sought to amend the Schedules in that case to remove Gyroshoes because it appears to be 

sufficiently related to Gyroor-US. 

 

 

 

 

Christopher Binns 

 

LOEB & LOEB LLP | ATTORNEY AT LAW

 

345 PARK AVENUE | NY, NY 10154

 

(212) 407-4213 |cbinns@loeb.com

 

 

 

 

From: Danielle McKinley <dmckinley@rmpartnerslaw.com> 

Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 4:34 PM 

To: Christopher Binns <cbinns@loeb.com> 

Cc: Patricia Earley <pearley@rmpartnerslaw.com> 

Subject: RE: Hangzhou v. The Partnerships (Case No. 1:20-cv-04806)

 

 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 317-4 Filed: 07/02/21 Page 5 of 13 PageID #:7204
5

 

 

 

 

Chris,

 

 

Following up on this. Can you confirm whether these storefronts are involved in the case? If so, can 

you provide me with the accused products/exhibits. If they are involved the requested documents 

should have been already filed with the court and easily accessible. I am getting some pressure to get 

this information. 

 

 

Gyroor (Shenzhen Chetaidou Keji)

 

Jiangyou-US (shenzhenjiangyoujinchukou)

 

Fengchi-US (Shen zhen shi feng chi dian qi) 

 

Urbanmax (Shenzhenshihualaibaoshengwukeji)

 

Runchengyun (Anhui Runchenyun Network Technology Co.)

 

Gyroshoes (Shenzhenshiyiranjinchukoumaoyi)

 

HGSM-US (anhuihaiguoshangmao)

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 317-4 Filed: 07/02/21 Page 6 of 13 PageID #:7205
6

GaodeshangUS (anhuigaodeshangjiaoyukeji)

 

Tomoloo-AOX (Shenzhen Aoxiang Dianzi)

 

Tomoloo-NX (Dongguanshi nanxinguiye)

 

 

 

Danielle S. McKinley 

 

P: 312.251.2292• E: dmckinley@rmpartnerslaw.com 

 

305 N. Peoria Street, Suite 200, Chicago, Illinois 60607 

 

 

 

From: Danielle McKinley 

Sent: Friday, February 19, 2021 2:24 PM 

To: Christopher Binns <cbinns@loeb.com> 

Cc: Patricia Earley <pearley@rmpartnerslaw.com> 

Subject: RE: Hangzhou v. The Partnerships (Case No. 1:20-cv-04806)

 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 317-4 Filed: 07/02/21 Page 7 of 13 PageID #:7206
7

 

Hi, Chris. Any update on this? Thanks!

 

 

Danielle S. McKinley 

 

P: 312.251.2292• E: dmckinley@rmpartnerslaw.com 

 

305 N. Peoria Street, Suite 200, Chicago, Illinois 60607 

 

 

 

From: Christopher Binns <cbinns@loeb.com> 

Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 9:16 AM 

To: Danielle McKinley <dmckinley@rmpartnerslaw.com> 

Cc: Patricia Earley <pearley@rmpartnerslaw.com> 

Subject: RE: Hangzhou v. The Partnerships (Case No. 1:20-cv-04806)

 

 

 

Hi Danielle, 

 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 317-4 Filed: 07/02/21 Page 8 of 13 PageID #:7207
8

We can agree to hold all discovery for the moving Tomoloo Defendants. I will get back to you shortly on 

the defendant question. 

 

 

All the best, 

 

CB

 

 

Christopher Binns 

 

LOEB & LOEB LLP | ATTORNEY AT LAW

 

345 PARK AVENUE | NY, NY 10154

 

(212) 407-4213 |cbinns@loeb.com

 

 

From: Christopher Binns 

Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2021 9:58 AM 

To: 'Danielle McKinley' <dmckinley@rmpartnerslaw.com> 

Cc: Patricia Earley <pearley@rmpartnerslaw.com> 

Subject: RE: Hangzhou v. The Partnerships (Case No. 1:20-cv-04806)

 

 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 317-4 Filed: 07/02/21 Page 9 of 13 PageID #:7208
9

Hi Danielle, 

 

 

That should be okay for the moving Tomoloo Defendants. I will confirm today and get back with you 

regarding your inquiry from yesterday. 

 

 

CB

 

 

Christopher Binns 

 

LOEB & LOEB LLP | ATTORNEY AT LAW

 

345 PARK AVENUE | NY, NY 10154

 

(212) 407-4213 |cbinns@loeb.com

 

 

From: Danielle McKinley <dmckinley@rmpartnerslaw.com> 

Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2021 9:19 AM 

To: Christopher Binns <cbinns@loeb.com> 

Cc: Patricia Earley <pearley@rmpartnerslaw.com> 

Subject: RE: Hangzhou v. The Partnerships (Case No. 1:20-cv-04806)

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 317-4 Filed: 07/02/21 Page 10 of 13 PageID #:7209
10

 

 

 

Chris,

 

 

As a follow up, you previously agreed to hold all discovery in abeyance until the Court rules on our 

motion to dismiss for Defendant GYROOR US. I wanted to confirm the same applies to the moving 

Tomoloo Defendants. 

 

 

Thank you!

 

Danielle

 

 

Danielle S. McKinley 

 

P: 312.251.2292• E: dmckinley@rmpartnerslaw.com 

 

305 N. Peoria Street, Suite 200, Chicago, Illinois 60607 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 317-4 Filed: 07/02/21 Page 11 of 13 PageID #:7210
11

 

 

From: Danielle McKinley 

Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2021 7:56 AM 

To: Christopher Binns <cbinns@loeb.com> 

Cc: Patricia Earley <pearley@rmpartnerslaw.com> 

Subject: RE: Hangzhou v. The Partnerships (Case No. 1:20-cv-04806)

 

 

 

Hi, Chris. Can you confirm whether these storefronts are involved in the case? If so, can you provide 

me with the accused products/exhibits. Thanks!

 

 

Gyroor (Shenzhen Chetaidou Keji)

 

Jiangyou-US (shenzhenjiangyoujinchukou)

 

Fengchi-US (Shen zhen shi feng chi dian qi) 

 

Urbanmax (Shenzhenshihualaibaoshengwukeji)

 

Runchengyun (Anhui Runchenyun Network Technology Co.)

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 317-4 Filed: 07/02/21 Page 12 of 13 PageID #:7211
12

Gyroshoes (Shenzhenshiyiranjinchukoumaoyi)

 

HGSM-US (anhuihaiguoshangmao)

 

GaodeshangUS (anhuigaodeshangjiaoyukeji)

 

Tomoloo-AOX (Shenzhen Aoxiang Dianzi)

 

Tomoloo-NX (Dongguanshi nanxinguiye)

 

 

 

Danielle S. McKinley 

 

P: 312.251.2292• E: dmckinley@rmpartnerslaw.com 

 

305 N. Peoria Street, Suite 200, Chicago, Illinois 60607 

 

 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 317-4 Filed: 07/02/21 Page 13 of 13 PageID #:7212