alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Per Skargard, the Chief Financial Officer ofConcordia Bus Nordic AB (publ), certify that to the best of my knowledge (i) theForm 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the informationcontained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Concordia Bus Nordic AB(publ).

 
|   |                    |   | Date: August 31, 2005 |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|----------------------------|
|   | Per Skargard            |   |                       |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |   |                       |

 

----
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 349 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                 House Calendar No. 143
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 349

                          [Report No. 105-414]

    Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 1575) to rename the 
  Washington National Airport located in the District of Columbia and 
     Virginia as the ``Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport''.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1998

   Mr. Solomon, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
    Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 1575) to rename the 
  Washington National Airport located in the District of Columbia and 
     Virginia as the ``Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport''.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (S. 1575) to rename the 
Washington National Airport located in the District of Columbia and 
Virginia as the ``Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport''. The bill 
shall be considered as read for amendment. The previous question shall 
be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on Transportation and Infrastructure; and (2) one motion to recommit.
                                     





                                                 House Calendar No. 143

105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 349

                          [Report No. 105-414]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

    Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 1575) to rename the 
  Washington National Airport located in the District of Columbia and 
     Virginia as the ``Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            February 4, 1998

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Vivid Learning Systems, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
        Robert Blodgett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to 18
        U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of
        2002, that:
 
 (1)
         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
        or 15(d)
        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.
 
 
 By: /s/Robert
        Blodgett
 Robert
        Blodgett
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 Date:
         December 28, 2005
EXHIBIT 10.(i)(I)(1)
                               Schedule 1
                     To Short Term Credit Agreement


                                               Commitment   Termination       

The Bank of New York                           19,800,000      09/06/96
The Bank of Nova Scotia                        19,800,000      09/06/96
CIBC, Inc.                                     19,800,000      09/06/96
NationsBank of North Carolina                  19,800,000      09/06/96
The Long-Term Credit Bank of Japan, Ltd.       18,150,000      09/06/96
Credit Lyonnais Chicago Branch and 
     Credit Lyonnais Cayman Island Branch      16,500,000      09/06/96
The First National Bank of Chicago             16,500,000      09/06/96
Banca Commerciale Italiana, Chicago Branch      9,900,000      09/06/96
The Dai-Ichi Kangyo Bank, Ltd., Chicago Branch  9,900,000      09/06/96
The Mitsubishi Bank, Ltd, Chicago Branch        9,900,000      09/06/96
Bank of America National Trust and Savings 
     Association                                8,250,000      09/06/96
Bank of America Illinois                        8,250,000      09/06/96
The Northern Trust Company                      8,250,000      09/06/96
The Sakura Bank, Ltd.                           8,250,000      09/06/96
The Sanwa Bank, Ltd, Chicago Branch             8,250,000      09/06/96
Swiss Bank Corporation                          8,250,000      09/06/96
U.S. National Bank of Oregon                    8,250,000      09/06/96
Union Bank                                      8,250,000      09/06/96
ABN AMRO Bank N.V.                              6,600,000      09/06/96
First Bank National Association                 6,600,000      09/06/96
The First National Bank of Boston               6,600,000      09/06/96
The Fuji Bank, Ltd.                             6,600,000      09/06/96
PNC Bank, National Association                  6,600,000      09/06/96
The Yasuda Trust and Banking Co., Ltd.          6,600,000      09/06/96
The First National Bank of Maryland             4,950,000      09/06/96
Istituto Bancario San Paolo di Torino,
     S.P.A., New York Bank                      4,950,000      09/06/96
Kredietbank N.V.                                4,950,000      09/06/96
Union Bank of Switzerland, Chicago Branch       4,950,000      09/06/96
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.                          4,950,000      09/06/96
Banca di Roma, S.P.A.                           3,300,000      09/06/96
Comerica Bank                                   3,300,000      09/06/96
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Pedro Solla, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Anthony J. Ferrara, J.), rendered May 21, 2013, convicting him, after a nonjury trial, of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Anthony J. Ferrara, J.), rendered May 21, 2013, affirmed.</p><p>The verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (<i>see People v Danielson</i>, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]), which established that the knife recovered from defendant conformed to the statutory definition of a gravity knife. The officer demonstrated twice in open court that he could open the knife by using centrifugal force, created by flicking his wrist, and the blade automatically locked in place after being released (<i>see</i> Penal Law ยง 265.00[5]; <i>People v Sans</i>, 26 NY3d 13 [2015]; <a href="../2010/2010_09169.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Neal</i>, 79 AD3d 523</a>, 524 [2010], <i>lv denied</i> 16 NY3d 799 [2011]; <a href="../2008/2008_01993.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Birth</i>, 49 AD3d 290</a> [2008], <i>lv denied</i> 10 NY3d 859 [2008]). Although defendant's expert testified that the knife could be opened by pressing a "thumb stud," he also testified that the blade could be released by a simple flick of the wrist, which satisfies the definition of a gravity knife <a href="../2011/2011_05933.htm" target="_blank"><i>(see People v Herbin</i>, 86 AD3d 446</a> [2011], <i>lv denied </i>17 NY3d 859 [2011]; <i>People v Neal</i>, 79 AD3d at 524).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: April 19, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Radiation Nanofocusing using Surface Plasmons

Sergey I. Bozhevolnyi

Institute of Sensors, Signals and Electrotechnics (SENSE)

University of Southern Denmark, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark

Nanofocusing of electromagnetic radiation, i.e. its concentrating well below the diffraction limit, is one 

of the most fundamental research directions in optics, in general, and in plasmonics, in particular, rich 

with prospective applications ranging from quantum optics to nanosensing. 

In this presentation, the radiation nanofocusing by making use of suitable surface plasmon (SP) modes 

supported by metal waveguides, i.e. the SP modes that scale down in size linearly with the waveguide 

cross section, is discussed. Nanofocusing with short-range SP modes of thin metal stripes, channel 

plasmon polaritons (which are SP modes supported by grooves cut into metal) and gap SP modes 

(existing in a narrow gap between metal surfaces) is considered in detail, presenting the underlying 

physics involved and reporting on design, fabrication and characterization of radiation nanofocusing. 

Efficient plasmon nanofocusing at telecom wavelengths with the estimated field intensity enhancement 

of up to ~ 100 is demonstrated and careful electromagnetic simulations predict intensity enhancements by 

three orders of magnitude. Further developments and possible applications of radiation nanofocusing 

using surface plasmons are also discussed.
3b9c48ebdcad1376b25a8773b7e3f59a662dad66a4e9a2975e8a31d87bf38685  BioCTS_ISO_IEC_3.2.8726.14508.zip
I 

★

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3964

To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit 

the operation of the Medicare comparative cost adjustment (CCA) program in California. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2004

Mr. STARK (for himself, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, 

Mr. MATSUI, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. BERMAN, Ms. PELOSI, Ms. WATERS, Mr. 

BECERRA, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. FILNER, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. FARR, Ms. LOFGREN, Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Mr. SHERMAN, Mrs. CAPPS, Ms. LEE, Mr. BACA, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Mr. 

HONDA, Mr. SCHIFF, Ms. SOLIS, Ms. WATSON, and Ms. LINDA T. 

SA ́NCHEZ of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act 

to prohibit the operation of the Medicare comparative 

cost adjustment (CCA) program in California.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3964 IH1S 

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON OPERATION OF MEDICARE 

2 COMPARATIVE COST ADJUSTMENT (CCA) 

3 PROGRAM IN CALIFORNIA. 

4 Section 1860C–1(b)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 

5 U.S.C. 1395w–29(b)(2)), as added by section 241(a) of 

6 the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Mod7 ernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108–173), is amended 

8 by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

9 ‘‘(C) NO PART IN CALIFORNIA.—No part 

10 of the MSA is in California.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Ecolocap Solutions Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Tri Vu Truong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 31st day of March, 2008.                                                                                                                  
|   



TRI VU TRUONGTri Vu Truong, Chief Executive Officer






















---
J

a

7-'

a

t

a

a

a

-a

a

a

a

!

a

I

:

a

o

I

a

sr.^

t) NffkU 5 ;,t ri:D t)$T R, i:cT

0I' 'J-; lttci| aa.\rel.tu

.,3r tP.l k fa" *:le

0wi>wtr

) C u..,.

I

' '('l'r'"

)

)

!-:, tr+cC.{fro tL

l,,)le ,>g :ill\ jJT,t

UOp.t("d,r; !.-)friqr'

l'.lr,, , ').(i (- \V'lq)

Jortn) f , Yrtr[:-15

, @@fi

t".'1 '''ltJ 5'

Vr

f.oe oi f;r-i,(:

- 

t 

'r 11 \gr ,,i 1"1

il .r:,i89

t'rn r'r: l, g;.(l\.1,

S 'C E anr,r.,t{ /,r

f J1,* ;ic 0f

t H';i:i0Y u,tr-+l'y ';'i,'./ f't{r: Afioue AaRc1E

0r roDArlr D,ire / | /?/ACu t afit &( e n/C'.,.r

,l+DO6Llt, L,\lri lt/o L}tL.ttli,ti Tl\) Cit,)|11r1t1 l/:t!)

&,Lur) ADD(c,.F Lttlr- 0e 7f fi 5 Wetfuit.nu,J &t'

ffurcn 3e l.L. , CIQS?-

Ar, ne(LAtG 11r,tt-:LR Pe ,tilta't( ul' C(tn J"'tP /

foftec!)(, TRtk I oatRn-t

[let rer, r tt,t-L/ 3qfra/6{feD /

i De,:/ lfiE,

<r'14

uot/c^ Q5 *rW,fWouar

Case: 1:20-cv-04760 Document #: 43 Filed: 11/29/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:162
A de;t

E E$ rr

\ /> Y /F.A'C o \^a d{Y--:& tr\ I

' x... c/

-t \r Fi G;'

F\q '$A\ir F N\- r.,1

?

,-i

lJ"

1.:- ;':ii-. 

r

N{1

af) or'

H'",' ti F^ 'I, :,

,Ft 3

,3 F{ sr ul brc) rFr

oN.) '

a

--t- -

. H I

t-1 - ht, \i

ll .A ; A \\.*- ga f

9o tst li {\ c-P { Io_ :- +

s\gU\ &8,? Rq,A-(>,o

C

t)

= -ai-E -J-

-

^>: U= N: -,--

s=

$l

r:!

ttr (]

$:r

I

l.J'

....t

il

ir!

ill

ti!

-riEt-

=-

vi-

-

-

-cv-04760 Document #: 43 Filed: 11/29/21 Page 2 of 2 Pa
#### John Gault *v.*R. A. Thompson, etc.

Vendor and Purchaser — Vendor’s Lien — Pleading.

Although, it may be necessary in a proceeding to enforce a vendor’s lien to allege the ability and willingness of the vendor to comply with the terms of his contract, such allegations are not- necessary to authorize a personal judgment against the vendee.

Equity — Personal Judgment.

A matter being properly in the equity court, it is error to render a personal judgment, since the parties have a right to full and complete relief at the hands of the chancellor.

APPEAL FROM FRANKLIN 'CIRCUIT COURT.

January 10, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay :

Although it may be necessary in a proceeding to enforce a vendor’s lien to allege the ability and willingness of the vendor to comply with the terms of his contract, yet such allegations are not necessary to authorize a personal judgment against the vendee.

The note itself may be made the foundation of the action, and it is not essential that the consideration shall ever be referred to. The petition in this case is certainly sufficient to sustain the judgment rendered, and appellant can not be heard on this appeal to complain that appellee failed to show that it was entitled to have its lien enforced, no judgment to that effect having been rendered.

Nor was it erroneous to render the personal judgment at an equity term. Being properly in a court of equity, the appellee had *288the right to demand at the hands of the chancellor full and complete relief.

*Drone, for appellant.*

*Julian, for appellees.*

The action not being in a condition to authorize the enforcement of the lien did not preclude appellee from demanding a personal judgment and, as appellants were in court and interposed no objection, such judgment was properly rendered. Judgment *affirmed.*
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67195-67196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26697]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review; Notice of Meetings

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub., L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces its 
intent to hold proposal review meetings throughout the year. The 
purpose of these meetings is to provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support. The 
agenda for each of these meetings is to review and evaluate proposals 
as part of the selection process for awards. The review and

[[Page 67196]]

evaluation may also include assessment of the progress of awarded 
proposals. The majority of these meetings will take place at NSF, 4201 
Wilson Blvd., Arlington, Virginia 22230.
    These meetings will be closed to the public. The proposals being 
reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, 
including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) 
of the Government in the Sunshine Act. NSF will continue to review the 
agenda and merits of each meeting for overall compliance of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act.
    These closed proposal review meetings will not be announced on an 
individual basis in the Federal Register. NSF intends to publish a 
notice similar to this on a quarterly basis. For an advance listing of 
the closed proposal review meetings that include the names of the 
proposal review panel and the time, date, place, and any information on 
changes, corrections, or cancellations, please visit the NSF Web site: 
http://www.nsf.gov/events/. This information may also be requested by 
telephoning, 703/292-8687.

    Dated: November 6, 2014
Suzanne Plimpton,
Acting Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-26697 Filed 11-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 136765 & (10)(11) Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, J ustices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 136765 COA: 284588 Wayne CC: 06-013495 JEFFREY DEWIGHT GASKINS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 8, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions for appointment of counsel and for remand to the trial court are DENIED.

p1117 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2008

Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Baseline Oil & Gas Corp. (the
Company), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for
the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2009 |  |  |  | /S/ Thomas Kaetzer                   
|                      |  |  |  | Thomas Kaetzer                       
|                      |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Timothy Leight, etc., *v.*E. W. Rupert.

Municipal Corporations — Street Improvement Ordinance.

A street improvement ordinance .providing for assessment in the proportion that each parcel of land 'hears to the portion of the street to he improved, was held to be in substantial compliance with the . statute.

APPEAL FROM DOUISVIUjE CHANCERY COURT.

December 21, 1872.

*137
      *Barrett & Roberts, for appellants.*

*Harrison, F. T. Fox, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The record in this case shows that the hoard of aldermen and the common council did each keep a regular journal, and that a full-and perfect record of the proceedings touching the passage of the ordinances and the approval of the' contract involved in this litigation was kept. There is nothing in the testimony of the witness Vaughan tending to. bring this case within the rule laid down in the case of McKegney, 7 Bush 651. The proof in that case showed conclusively that no journal had been kept at all, but that the ordinances were merely published in a newspaper, and then cut out and preserved, not by both or either of the branches of the city legislature, but by such of the city officers as felt interest enough in the matter to do so.

We are of opinion that the General Ordinance No. 292, Elliott’s Digest 787, is substantially all that is required by the 27th Section of the act of March 9, 1868. It does provide for the rate of apportionment of the cost incurred in the improvements of streets, ■ i. e., ■ that such cost shall be apportioned according to the number of feet each lot shall front on the improvement.

It would have been impossible either by a general or special ordinance, to have fixed the exact amount to which each lot should be subjected, in advance of the contract, as the general council could not know in advance the amount which it would be necessary to pay. for the entire work. The statutes can not and ought not to be so construed as to render it wholly inoperative.

That no lot could be held subject to the payment of a greater excess than 25 per cent, more than the amount assessed against the same area of other lots, does not prove that the assessment could not be legally made against such in proportion to the front feet thereof, but rather that in making the apportionment in that manner this rule should operate as a limitation in favor of corner lots, and lots running back a less number of feet than those generally do which front on the improvement. There is no complaint that in the assessment against the lots of these appellants this limitation was disregarded.

Judgment *affirmed.*