alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.28  Execution Version  SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT  This
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement (Amendment) is made and
entered into by and between GERARD J. HART (Executive) and TEXAS
ROADHOUSE, INC., a Delaware corporation ( the Company).  WHEREAS,Executive and the Company entered into that certain
Employment Agreement effective December 26, 2007, as amended by that
Amendment to Employment Agreement effective January 1, 2009 (the Agreement)
providing for the employment of the Executive by the Company; and  WHEREAS,the parties now mutually desire to further amend
the Agreement.  NOW THEREFORE,for good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby
agree as follows:  1.             Capitalized terms not otherwise
defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.  2.             The Term is extended for a period
of one (1) year until January 7, 2012 (the Extended Term),
unless the Agreement is earlier terminated as permitted pursuant to the terms
of the Agreement.  3.             During the Extended Term, Executive
shall continue to be paid a base salary at his current rate of Six Hundred
Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($600,000.00) per fiscal year.  4.             During the Extended Term, Executive
shall continue to be eligible for an annual target incentive bonus in the same
amount applicable to the 2010 fiscal year.  5.             On January 8, 2011, the
Executive shall be granted 80,000 Restricted Stock Units which shall vest on January 7,
2013.  6.             Except as expressly amended hereby,
the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.  [Signature page follows.]  1


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,and intending to be legally
bound thereby, Executive and the Company have executed the foregoing Amendment
on the dates set forth below.   TEXAS
  ROADHOUSE, INC.Dated:
  February 18,
  2010
  
  By:
  /s/
  W. Kent TaylorName:
  W.
  Kent TaylorIts:
  ChairmanGERARD
  J. HARTDated:
  February 18,
  2010
  
  /s/
  G.J. Hart  2
Order filed September 1, 2022 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-22-00522-CV

____________

JOSE JUAN MALDONADO, Appellant

V.

YELLOWFIN LOAN SERVICING CORP., AS THE SUCCESSOR IN 

INTEREST TO SUMMIT MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-004152-2

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed July 25, 2022. Our review has determined that a 

relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P.

34.5(c). The record does not contain the Final Summary Judgment signed June 6, 

2022.
The Tarrant County Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on 

or before September 12, 2022, containing the Final Summary Judgment signed 

June 6, 2022.

If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to 

file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted 

item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4041 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4041

To waive, in fiscal year 2004, the numerical limitation applicable to a 
     nonimmigrant described in section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, if the employer petitioning on behalf 
 of the nonimmigrant employed such a nonimmigrant in fiscal year 2003, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 2004

 Mr. Goodlatte (for himself, Mr. Jones of North Carolina, Mr. Simmons, 
Mr. Van Hollen, Ms. Loretta Sanchez of California, Mr. Cannon, and Mrs. 
  Jo Ann Davis of Virginia) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To waive, in fiscal year 2004, the numerical limitation applicable to a 
     nonimmigrant described in section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, if the employer petitioning on behalf 
 of the nonimmigrant employed such a nonimmigrant in fiscal year 2003, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF NUMERICAL LIMITATION FOR CERTAIN H2B 
              NONIMMIGRANTS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 214(g)(1)(B) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)(1)(B)), the numerical 
limitation contained in such section shall not apply, in fiscal year 
2004, to an alien for whom an employer described in subsection (b) 
files a petition described in section 214(c)(1) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 
1184(c)(1)).
    (b) Employers Described.--An employer described in this subsection 
is an employer who lawfully employed, in fiscal year 2003, a 
nonimmigrant described in section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b)).
    (c) Limitation.--Subsection (a) shall cease to apply to an alien 
when the number of petitions under section 214(c)(1) of such Act 
approved in fiscal year 2004 for the employer petitioning for such 
alien, with respect to the importation of aliens as nonimmigrants under 
section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) of such Act, exceeds the number of such 
nonimmigrants lawfully employed by the employer in fiscal year 2003.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3823 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3823

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 
            relations treatment) to the products of Belarus.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 2004

  Mr. Paul (for himself and Mr. Flake) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 
            relations treatment) to the products of Belarus.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Belarus Freedom Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that Belarus--
            (1) allows its citizens the right and opportunity to 
        emigrate, free of any heavy tax on the visas or other documents 
        required for emigration and free of any other tax, levy, fine, 
        fee, or other charge on any citizens as a consequence of the 
        desire of such citizens to emigrate to the country of their 
        choice; and
            (2) has received normal trade relations treatment since 
        1992 and has been in full compliance with the freedom of 
        emigration requirements under title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 
        since 1994.

SEC. 3. TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV OF THE TRADE ACT OF 1974 
              TO BELARUS.

    (a) Presidential Determinations and Extensions of Nondiscriminatory 
Treatment.--Notwithstanding any provision of title IV of the Trade Act 
of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.), the President may--
            (1) determine that such title should no longer apply to 
        Belarus; and
            (2) after making a determination under paragraph (1) with 
        respect to Belarus, proclaim the extension of nondiscriminatory 
        treatment (normal trade relations treatment) to the products of 
        that country.
    (b) Termination of Application of Title IV.--On and after the 
effective date of the extension under subsection (a)(2) of 
nondiscriminatory treatment to the products of Belarus, title IV of the 
Trade Act of 1974 shall cease to apply to that country.
                                 <all>
```
Using Goal Structure 

to Perform Risk Assessment during Driving Maneuvers

Prof. Brian Williams

mers.csail.mit.edu

Model‐based Embedded and Robotic Systems Group, 

Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, M
Proactive Risk-Bounded Driving Systems

Will estimate, alert and adapt to potential threats before they beco

Potential Threats 
Geordi: A Risk-aware Driving Aid

Highway On-Ramp Scenario:Agent vehicle (red): moving on ramp. Ego vehicle (yellow): slow down and change to the left lane.

Geordi:1. Probabilistic

vehicle trajemaneuvers 

2. Generates r

vehicle trajegiven estima

3. Proactively 

for safe manfor likely driv
Geordi Frames Risk Assessment using Chance 

over Driver Goals and Safety Constraints.

Driving ProblemFind the fastest path tgoal, while limiting the chance of crashing to tenth of a percent. R

Start

Goal

Walls

Planned Path

Actual Path

Driver goals specified 1. initial pose,2. goal pose,3. safety constraint, and4. bound on probability o

(chance constraint).
Risk‐aware Vehicles and Advisors

Risk-bounded Trajectories are Generated by Solving a Stochastic Program

E.g., using Algorithmic Risk Allocation [Ono & Williams, AAA
The influence of unce

probability dvehicle state

Vehicle paths deviate 

due to uncertainty

Risk Assessment is Rooted in Probabilistic Predictions of Vehic
Trajectory Prediction uses Probabilistic Vehicle and Se

states inputs

Continuous State Space Model

ݔ௞ାଵ ൌ ݂ሺݔ

ݑ ,௞

௞, ߱

௞

ሻ

Uncertainty ~ p(

߱

velocity and position: ݏ݁ݐܽݐݏ

Torque, angle Steering :ݏݐݑ݌݅݊	݈݋ݎݐ݊݋ܿ

ݑ

ଶ

ଵݑ

ݔ ,ଵݔሺ

ଶ

ሻ

• Dynamics may be non-linear.• Sensor and actuation noise m
. . .

Proactive Driving Systems Need Predictions Over Long

Problem: Uncertainty increases dramatically over time,  Driver goals, Vehicle maneuvering, Driver styles.

Idea: Probabilistically Estimate• Maneuver sequence of each vehicle.• Vehicle motion, given maneuver sequence.

• Vehicle state, driver type, driver goal.

 Use to assess risk and to plan.
Probabilistic Maneuver Models Predic

Vehicle Trajectories for Each Driver Typ

Quantitative:

❖

A maneuver is

a bundle of trajectories,

called

a probabilistic flow tube.

❖ Maneuver risk corresponds to

trajectories in its flow tube that are

blocked.

Qualitative:

❖ Maneuvers are

“actions

”

that specify poses over time.

❖ Switch left,

switch right,

exit
. . .

Risk-assessment and Planning of Maneuver Sequenceis Framed as a Stochastic Game

݌ ݏ ଴: Probability distributio

ego vehicle e.g., ሾݔ଴, ݕ଴, ݒ௫

Actions for Ego vehicle

Observationsfor Agent vehicle

OR

AND

Goal State

...

Geordi generates policie

solving a stochastic shor

• Chance-constrained• Concurrent• Hidden state,• Hybrid discrete / continuous Risk-bounded A0* [Sant
Questions?
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 3, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00199

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N .C.F., ET AL

., CHILDREN

From the 150th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- CI

- 11406

Honorable Richard E. Price , Judge Presiding

ORDER

This appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. The costs of this appeal are taxed against appellant.

It is so ORDERED on October 3, 2018

.

_____________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of October, 2018

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
#### Kevin P. WELDON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald L. EVANS, Secretary, Department of Commerce, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 04-1636.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 30, 2004.

Decided Dec. 21, 2004.

Kevin P. Weldon, Appellant pro se. Richard Parker, Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Kevin P. Weldon appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing his action alleging claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and constitutional claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Weldon v. Evans,*No. CA-04-11-1 (E.D. Va. filed March 19, 2004; entered March 22, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
EXHIBIT 13.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of GOL LINHAS AÉREAS INTELIGENTES S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard F. Lark, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: May 1, 2017 By:               /s/Richard F. Lark, Jr.Name:Richard F. Lark, Jr.Title:Chief Financial Officer
Amended Letter Agreement, by and between TCULC and Pierre Duhamel



 Exhibit 10.2 
 November 9, 2005 
  
 Mr. Pierre Duhamel 
 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 
  

	 	Re:	AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

  
 Dear Pierre, 
  
 I am pleased to confirm that Teleglobe Canada ULC (“Teleglobe”) has approved the following changes, effective
November 1, 2005, to your employment agreement dated January 10, 2005 (“Agreement”): 
  
 1) Base Salary: CAD $360,000 per annum, subject to annual increase as per the company’s practices. 
  
 2) Incentive Compensation: With respect to 2005, the
target performance level shall be 140% of base salary, retroactive to January 1, 2005. 
  
 3) Termination: The target bonus set out in clause (c) of the section regarding “Termination” shall be amended from 100%
of base salary to 140% of base salary. 
  
 Except as amended
above, the terms and conditions of the Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed, and shall remain in full force and effect. 
  
 Please indicate your acceptance of these employment conditions by signing this document and returning the original copy to Nicole Lemay, Vice President,
Human Resources. 
  
 Thank you for your continued contributions
and commitment to the success of Teleglobe. 
  
  

	
	Best regards,
	
	/s/    LIAM STRONG        
	Liam Strong
	President and Chief Executive Officer

  

	cc:	Nicole Lemay, VP, Human Resources 

  
 I accept the conditions described in this letter. 
  

			
	 Signature: /s/    PIERRE
DUHAMEL        
	  	Date: November 9, 2005
November 2001 

Update on Devices Used to Measure Fat Content in Animal 

Carcasses 

By: Dick Suiter 

On November 15 and 16, 2001, ASTM held the first meeting of ASTM Committee F10 

on Livestock, Meat, and Poultry Evaluation Systems at the National Pork Board Offices 

in Des Moines, Iowa with 26 members attending. The Task Group for Executive 

Committee Officers presented the names of five individuals it was recommending for the 

officers positions on the Executive Committee. The members present elected the 

following individuals as officers: 

John Edmonds (USDA, GIPSA) Chair 

Leonard Huskey (Swift & Company) 1st Vice Chair 

Jennifer Colbert (NIST/Standard Reference Materials) 2nd Vice Chair 

Chris Calkins (University of Nebraska) Recording Secretary 

Mohammed Koohmaraie (USDA,ARS) Membership Secretary 

The following Subcommittee Chairs are also members of the Executive Committee: 

F 10.10 Design Specifications; Richard Suiter, Chair 

F 10.20 Device Performance Criteria; Darryl Brown, Chair 

F 10.30 User Requirements; Duane Short, Chair 

F 10.40 Predictive Accuracy; Dave Meisinger, Chair 

The Subcommittee Chairs each presented an initial plan for work of their subcommittee. 

Four task groups were formed from the members present to begin the subcommittee 

work. The task groups met during the afternoon of the first day and the morning of the 

second day at which time each Subcommittee Chair presented a report to the entire group 

on progress made. The Sub Committee task groups will continue to work electronically 

to develop their part of the Standard. 

The Executive Committee also held its first meeting at the end of the first day. The 

Executive Committee reviewed the Bylaws presented by, the Bylaws Task Group. The 

Executive Committee recommended several small revisions to the Bylaws, which will 

now be distributed for ballot. No date was set for the next meeting. A full Committee 

Meeting will be called as needed. 

 

For additional background on this issue see the February and August 2001 issues of the 

Weights & Measures Quarterly. For additional information on F10 or on becoming a 

Committee Member, contact Dick Suiter (NIST) by e-mail at rsuiter@nist.gov or by 

phone at (301) 975-4406.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04699

Honorable John Z. Lee

TikTok Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, November 4, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Status hearing held on 11/4/20.

The parties provided an update to the Court regarding settlement discussions. Plaintiffs

should submit a proposed order for time and expenses and contact the courtroom deputy

when they have done so. Status hearing set for 12/2/20 at 2:00 p.m. via Microsoft Teams.

The telephone dial in number is 872−703−5321, conference ID 648899934#. All persons

granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against

photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these

prohibitions may result in court−imposed sanctions, including removal of court issued

media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or

any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. All participants should review the

Court's standing order regarding telephone conferences that is on Judge Lee's website,

which can be found at: https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge−.info.aspx?4Qf

5zc8loCI5U7rfMP9DHw==.Mailed notice(ca, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 101 Filed: 11/04/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1839
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 226 (Monday, November 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 69869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27670]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
USC, as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel; Neuroscience Information Framework Applications--
RFA-DA-15-009 (U24).
    Date: December 15, 2014.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate cooperative agreement 
applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Jose F. Ruiz, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, 
Room 4228, MSC 9550, 6001 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892-9550, 
(301) 451-3086, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a2d0d7cbd8c8c4e2cccbc6c38ccccbca8cc5cdd4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dcaea9b5a6b6ba9cb2b5b8bdf2b2b5b4f2bbb3aa">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos.: 93.279, Drug 
Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 18, 2014.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-27670 Filed 11-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>