alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Railroad Retirement Board

## Notice of Public Meeting

Notice is hereby given in accordance with Public Law 92-463 that the Actuarial Advisory Committee will hold a meeting on December 17, 2014, at 10:30 a.m. at the office of the Chief Actuary of the U.S. Railroad Retirement Board, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois, on the conduct of the 26th Actuarial Valuation of the Railroad Retirement System. The agenda for this meeting will include a discussion of the assumptions to be used in the 26th Actuarial Valuation. A report containing recommended assumptions and the experience on which the recommendations are based will have been sent by the Chief Actuary to the Committee before the meeting.

The meeting will be open to the public. Persons wishing to submit written statements or make oral presentations should address their communications or notices to the Actuarial Advisory Committee, c/o Chief Actuary, U.S. Railroad Retirement Board, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092.

Martha P. Rico,

Secretary to the Board.

[FR Doc. 2014-27542 Filed 11-20-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7905-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Baseline Oil & Gas Corp. (the
Company), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for
the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated: March 31, 2008 |  |  |  | /S/ Thomas Kaetzer                   
|                      |  |  |  | Thomas Kaetzer                       
|                      |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report of NB Capital Corporation (the Company),
for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Serge Lacroix,
Chairman and President of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of           the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | the
information contained in the           Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ Serge Lacroix
Serge Lacroix
Chairman and President
| | ------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 14, 2003

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or any other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04699

Honorable John Z. Lee

TikTok Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, January 13, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:The telephone dial in number

for the 1/14/21 status hearing is 872−703−5321, conference ID 648899934#. The hearing

will take place via Microsoft Teams. All persons granted remote access to proceedings are

reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting

of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in court−imposed

sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future

hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by

the Court. All participants should review the Court's standing order regarding telephone

conferences that is on Judge Lee's website, which can be found at:

https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge−.info.aspx?4Qf 5zc8loCI5U7rfMP9DHw==(ca, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 117 Filed: 01/13/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1999
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 221 (Monday, November 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 68497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27132]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8951]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Keir Collection of Art of the Islamic World'' 
Exhibitions

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibitions of ``Keir Collection of Art of the Islamic 
World,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the Dallas Museum of Art, Dallas, TX, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, from on about October 1, 
2015, until on or about December 31, 2019, is in the national interest. 
I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published 
in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: November 10, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-27132 Filed 11-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto RUIZ-ESPINOSA, also known as Enrique Espinosa, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-51270.

Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 25, 2003.

Before DEMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Roberto Ruiz-Espinosa appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Ruiz contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Ruiz maintains that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense. Alternatively, he argues that construing 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) as a sentence-enhancement provision renders the statute unconstitutional.

In *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. *Id.*at 239-47, 118 S.Ct. 1219. Ruiz acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres,*but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review.

*Apprendi*did not overrule *AlmendarezTorres. See Apprendi,*530 U.S. at 489-90, 120 S.Ct. 2348; *United States v. Dabeit,*231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir.2000). This court must follow *Almendarez-Torres*“un*901less and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” *Dabeit, 231*F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3933

To repeal section 754 of the Tariff Act of 1930. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2004

Mr. RAMSTAD (for himself and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To repeal section 754 of the Tariff Act of 1930.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CONTINUED DUMPING AND SUB4 SIDY OFFSET. 

5 (a) REPEAL.—Section 754 of the Tariff Act of 1930 

6 (19 U.S.C. 1675c), and the item relating to section 754 

7 in the table of contents for title VII of that Act, are re8 pealed. 

9 (b) EXISTING ACCOUNTS.—All amounts remaining, 

10 upon the enactment of this Act, in any special account 

11 established under section 754(e)(1) of the Tariff Act of 

12 1930 (as in effect on the day before the date of the enact-
2

•HR 3933 IH 

1 ment of this Act) shall be deposited in the general fund 

2 of the Treasury.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 586 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                       October 9, 1998.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 3150) to amend title 
11 of the United States Code, and for other purposes. All points of order 
against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The 
report shall be considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
H. Res. 518

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 13, 1998.

Whereas Gabon is a heavily forested and oil-rich country on

central Africa’s west coast;

Whereas Gabon gained independence from France in 1960;

Whereas the Government of Gabon is involved in ongoing efforts to mediate regional conflicts;

Whereas Gabon is scheduled to hold national elections in December 1998 for the purpose of electing a President;

Whereas Gabon was subject to single-party rule until 1990;

Whereas the International Foundation for Election Systems

(IFES) and the Africa America Institute (AAI) served as

observers during the organization of the 1993 Presidential and legislative elections in Gabon and found widespread electoral irregularities;

Whereas the Government of Gabon is a signatory to the

‘‘Paris Accords’’ of 1994, approved by national referendum in July 1995, which provides for a state of law

guaranteeing basic individual freedoms and the organization of free and fair elections under a new independent

national election commission;

Whereas the people of Gabon have demonstrated their support for the democratic process through the formation of
2

•HRES 518 EH

numerous political parties since 1990 and their strong

participation in prior elections; and

Whereas it is in the interest of the United States to promote

political and economic freedom in Africa and throughout

the world: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) recognizes and commends the Government of

Gabon’s ongoing efforts to resolve central African conflicts;

(2) recognizes and commends those Gabonese who

have demonstrated their love for free and fair elections;

(3) commends the Gabonese Government for inviting IFES to perform a pre-election assessment study;

(4) calls on the Gabonese Government—

(A) to take further measures to help ensure a

credible election and to ensure that the election

commission remains independent and impartial; and

(B) to further welcome IFES, the National

Democratic Institute, the International Republican

Institute, or other appropriate international nongovernmental organizations to aid the organization

and oversight of, the December 1998 Presidential

election in Gabon, in an effort to ensure that these

elections in Gabon are free and fair;
3

•HRES 518 EH

(5) urges the Government of Gabon to take all necessary and lawful steps toward conducting free and fair

elections;

(6) calls on the international community to join the

United States in offering their assistance toward conducting free and fair elections in Gabon;

(7) urges the United States Government to continue

to provide support directly and through appropriate nongovernmental organizations to aid the organization of

free and fair elections in Gabon; and

(8) urges the United States Government and the

international community to continue to encourage the

Government of Gabon to ensure a lasting and committed

transition to democracy.

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at June 30, 1999 (Unaudited) and
the Consolidated Statement of Income for the nine months ended June 30, 1999
(Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,183
<SECURITIES>                                    42,999
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,182
<PP&E>                                         441,158
<DEPRECIATION>                                 368,824
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,846,656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          558,146
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,062
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,250,703
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,846,656
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  845,809
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               342,431
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,777
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (977,641)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (977,641)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (977,641)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)


</TABLE>
Measurement Science & Standards in 

Forensic Firearms

Analysis

Measurement Science Advances in 

Firearms Analysis

Focus Variation

Brad Etter

Alicona

July 10-11, 2012

004606032012
Focus-Variation

1

2

3

1

2

3
Focus-Variation as a

Measurement Technique
Information at each Measurement Point

» 3D-Position (x, y, z)

» Color (R G B)

» Est. Repeatability
Measure Form and Roughness with one 

Instrument 

Form Roughness &
Benefits of Focus-Variation

+Rough and smooth surfaces

+Color information

+Steep flanks

+Diversity of materials

+Large measurement areas

+Ease of use

Form and roughness + in one measurement
Focus-Variation 

Technical Specifications

Optical 3D-surface metrology

based on a color focus sensor

Surface measurements in less than 16 sec.

(2 million measurement points)

Vertical resolution >10nm

Lateral resolution >400nm

Scan height <22mm

Scan area 100mm x 100mm
Where Focus Variation Fits

Measurement 

Volume

Resolution

1nm

10nm

100nm

1μm

10μm

100μm

1mm

Structured

Light

Focus-Variation

Confocal

WLI
» 50X Objective Number of Points: 10million

» Vertical Resolution: 20nm Size of ImageField: 2.66mm x 1.80mm
Profile Form Measurement

» Profile path: 50x objective, realcolor. 

» Profile width 8.8μm

Measurement Depth Width

[1] Rifling 0.8μm 12.2μm

[2] Rifling 1.6μm 15.3μm

[3] Rifling 1.5μm 12.4μm
Firing Pin 

» Objective 10x Size of measurement point 880nm

» Vertical resolution 800nm

» Number of points 3.7 million

» Size of ImageField 2.68mm x 1.08mm
Firing Pin 

» Measurement Result

» Depth 699.9μm
Real3D
Measuring Real3D-Data

Specimen
Contour Analysis

» Measurement results contour analysis – Circle fitting

» Radius 3.919 mm

» Surface 48.25 mm2

» Maximum deviation 82.17 μm

» Mean deviation 35.797 μm
Roughness: Profile VS Area
Roughness-Profile Based

» Ra 86.029 nm Ra 559.06 nm
Roughness- Area Based

» Sa 582.79 nm 
Core Surface Volume
Difference Measurement
Difference Measurement
Measurements include...

» Roughness measurements

Profile based

4287,...

Area based

ISO 28178, corrosion,...

» Form measurements

Diameter, sink hole measurement, roundness...

» Orientation measurements

Distances, geometries,...
Focus-Variation provides...

» Up to 100 Mil. 3D-points

» Across an area of 100x100mm

» Vertical scan range of 100mm (at 23mm working distance)

» Full 360°

» The largest variety of materials (solid)

» Resolution of up to 10nm

» Data Export: .STL, TEXT, VRML, .SUR, OpenGPS
Focus Variation

Form and Roughness in One System
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 6, 2011

d0829 

# Order

September 6, 2011

141702(67)

LOLINDA RANDOLPH, Pe rsonal Representative of the Estate of BRYAN RANDOLPH, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 141702 COA: 285103 Wayne CC: 05-533887-NH HENRY FORD HOSPITAL, HENRY FORD SYSTEM, INC., DR. SCOTT E. LANGENBERG,
and MICHIGAN PEDIATRIC SURGICAL ASSOCIATES, P.C., Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s March 23, 2011 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

M ARILYN K ELLY and H ATHAWAY , JJ., would grant rec onsideration and, on reconsideration, would grant leave to appeal.

Z AHRA , J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.