alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3794 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3794

  For the relief of the heirs of Henry D. Espy of St. Louis, Missouri.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 2004

 Mr. Conyers introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  For the relief of the heirs of Henry D. Espy of St. Louis, Missouri.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPENSATION OF CERTAIN LOSSES FOR THE HEIRS OF HENRY D. 
              ESPY OF ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.

    (a) Definition.--In this section, the term ``heirs of Henry D. 
Espy'' means Mary Espy, Mary Espy Rhodes Hoover, Frances Espy Rankin, 
Jeannette Espy Burton, Mark Espy, Damon Espy, Jamisette Espy, Ashley 
Espy, Luke Espy, Reuben Gresham, Melanie Espy, Jasmine Espy, Jake Espy, 
Jeanne Hoover, Robert Hoover, Harold Logan, Andrew Logan, Minda Logan, 
Andrew Logan II, Gabrielle Logan, Justin Logan, and Randall Rhodes 
Logan.
    (b) Payment.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, using funds 
in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to the heirs of Henry D. 
Espy of St. Louis, Missouri, as their interests may appear, an amount 
equal to the difference between--
            (1) the fair market value of land owned by Henry D. Espy 
        located in Gifford, Indian River County, Florida, that was 
        taken by the United States in an eminent domain proceeding in 
        1942, as determined by an appraisal satisfactory to the 
        Secretary and the heirs of Henry D. Espy; and
            (2) sums already paid by the United States to Henry D. Espy 
        in connection with such taking.
    (c) Settlement.--The payment under subsection (b) shall be in full 
settlement of all claims of the heirs of Henry D. Espy arising from the 
1942 taking referred to in such subsection.
    (d) No Inference of Liability.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed as an inference of liability on the part of the United 
States.
    (e) Limitation on Agents' and Attorneys' Fees.--Any contract to the 
contrary notwithstanding, no more than ten percent of the payment 
required by subsection (b) may be paid to or received by any agent or 
attorney for services rendered in connection with obtaining such 
payment. Any person who violates this subsection shall be guilty of a 
misdemeanor and shall be subject to a fine in the amount provided in 
title 18, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03758

Honorable Thomas M. Durkin

Long Leaf Trading Group, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, November 13, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Motions for extension

of time to answer [17] and [19] are terminated as moot. Fact discovery ordered closed by

5/1/2021. A telephone status conference is set for 2/16/2021 at 9:00 a.m. To join the

telephone conference, dial 877−402−9757, Access Code 4410831. Mailed notice. (ecw, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 40 Filed: 11/13/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:308
MEP Advisory Board Meeting 

September 15, 2016

Agenda*

Detroit Marriott at the Renaissance Center 

Renaissance Center, 400 Renaissance Drive, Detroit Michigan 48243

8:00 – 8:05 Meeting Logistics Cheryl Gendron, NIST MEP

8:05 – 8:20 Welcome and Introductions

• Opening Remarks

• Board and Audience Introductions 

• Welcome New Board Member

Carroll Thomas, Director, NIST MEP

Vickie Wessel, Chair, MEP Advisory Board

8:20 – 9:00 MEP Director’s Updates Carroll Thomas, Director, NIST MEP

9:00 – 10:00 Trends in Economic Development Impacting the 

MEP System

Dan Berglund with SSTI

10:00 - 10:15 Break

10:15 - 11:00 MEP Strategic Plan 2017-2022; Update from 

board working committee

Vickie Wessel, Chair, MEP Advisory Board

Dave Cranmer, Deputy Director, NIST MEP

11:00 – 12:15 Connecting User Facilities and Labs with 

SMMs; Update from board working 

subcommittee

Jeff Wilcox, Vice Chair, MEP Advisory Board

Clara Asmail, NIST MEP

12:15 – 1:45 Lunch Break

1:45 - 2:45 MEP Learning Organization; Update from board 

working subcommittee

MaryAnn Pacelli, NIST MEP

2:45 – 3:30 Wrap-up/Public Comments

• Re-appointment of Board Officers, Chair 

& Vice Chair

• Discussion: Board Governance, 

Succession planning & Quorum

Carroll Thomas, NIST MEP

Vickie Wessel, Chair, MEP Advisory Board

Official Meeting Ends

3:30 – 4:00 Optional for Board Members:

Demo of Lockheed Martin’s Engage Platform

Jeff Wilcox, Vice Chair, MEP Advisory Board

Clara Asmail, NIST MEP

*Agenda/Schedule	Subject	to	Change

Rev.	9/2/2016
exv4w5



 






EXHIBIT 4.5




Schedule of Fixed Rate InterNotes Issued




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Interest	 	Interest	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Coupon	 	Coupon	 	Issue	 	Maturity	 	Principal	 	 	Redemption
	CUSIP No.	 	Rate	 	Frequency	 	Date	 	Date	 	Amount	 	 	Information
	26876ECK9
	 	4.400%	 	Semi-annual	 	07/14/05	 	07/15/08	 	$	671,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876ECL7
	 	4.500%	 	Quarterly	 	07/14/05	 	07/15/09	 	$	425,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876ECM5
	 	4.400%	 	Semi-annual	 	07/21/05	 	07/15/08	 	$	549,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876ECN3
	 	4.500%	 	Semi-annual	 	07/21/05	 	07/15/09	 	$	209,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876ECP8
	 	4.450%	 	Quarterly	 	07/28/05	 	07/15/08	 	$	2,102,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876ECQ6
	 	4.550%	 	Quarterly	 	07/28/05	 	07/15/09	 	$	766,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876ECR4
	 	4.550%	 	Monthly	 	09/01/05	 	09/15/08	 	$	981,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876ECS2
	 	4.650%	 	Quarterly	 	09/01/05	 	09/15/09	 	$	127,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876ECT0
	 	4.550%	 	Quarterly	 	09/09/05	 	09/15/08	 	$	1,123,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876ECU7
	 	4.650%	 	Semi-annual	 	09/09/05	 	09/15/09	 	$	1,094,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876ECV5
	 	4.400%	 	Semi-annual	 	09/15/05	 	09/15/08	 	$	536,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876ECW3
	 	4.450%	 	Quarterly	 	09/15/05	 	09/15/09	 	$	65,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876ECX1
	 	4.400%	 	Quarterly	 	09/22/05	 	09/15/08	 	$	409,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876ECY9
	 	4.500%	 	Monthly	 	09/22/05	 	09/15/09	 	$	534,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876ECZ6
	 	4.650%	 	Quarterly	 	09/22/05	 	09/15/11	 	$	372,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EDA0
	 	4.450%	 	Semi-annual	 	09/29/05	 	09/15/08	 	$	180,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EDB8
	 	4.550%	 	Semi-annual	 	09/29/05	 	09/15/09	 	$	128,000	 	 	Non-callable
	26876EDC6
	 	4.700%	 	Semi-annual	 	09/29/05	 	09/15/11	 	$	190,000	 	 	Non-callable
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE COMPANY DOES NOT FILE A CLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET, THEREFORE THESE NOT
PROVIDED. 5-02(9), 5-02(21)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,249
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,399
<ALLOWANCES>                                       288
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         858,218
<DEPRECIATION>                                 122,515
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 761,165
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        260,244
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           286
<OTHER-SE>                                     465,359
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   761,165
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               100,387
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,075
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,573
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    94
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,518
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,133
<INCOME-TAX>                                       770
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,363
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,363
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.83
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Nos. 333-118059, 333-135242, 333-151195, 333-159712, 333-159713 and 333-167180) and on Form S-3
(Nos. 333-150087, 333-162303 and 333-165784) of NeuroMetrix, Inc. of our report dated March 7, 2011 relating to the financial statements and
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston,
Massachusetts
March 7, 2011

---



QuickLinks
Fake detection WS

Axel Munde

How can artifact detection complement 

common criteria and other security 

assessments of authentication systems?
Some Questions

• Focus of Standard?

• Is fake detection related to biometric quality?

• Fake detection vs Liveness detection?

• Are the results of fake detection predictable?

• How biometric modal specific is fake detection?

• How to measure/evaluate fake resistance?

• Actual CC approach – Security by obscurity – Useful?

– Determination of Fake recognition rate?

• Useful to encode fake resistance in interchange formats?

• Focus on fake detection for fingerprints? 

• Brute Force and Hill Climbing attacks?

09. March 2012 NIST Fake Detection WS 2 
Fake WS

Artefact (3 rd WD WD 30107)

artificial object(s) or characteristic(s) presenting 

a copy of biometric characteristics or synthetic 

pattern made to be presented to a biometric 

capture device with the aim of subverting the 

biometric system.

09. March 2012 NIST Fake Detection WS 3 
Challenges of Biometrics

1. Statistical properties (FAR / FRR <=> BEM <=> SC37 

WG5 Standards)

2. Strong and weak biometrics and the “Zoo” (User 

depending) – Quality related?

– In 1. and 2. – No (technical) tools used for attacking

3. Attacks on biometric systems using fakes

4. ... 

Other Challenges?

09. March 2012 NIST Fake Detection WS 4 
Attack Potential

- Calculation and Rating - 

Attack Potential = Elapsed Time + Expertise + Knowledge 

 of TOE + Window of Opportunity + 

 Equipment

Value Resistant against attackers with attack potential of:

0 – 4 No rating

5 – 9 Minimal

10 – 13 Basic

14 – 19 Enhanced-Basic

20 – 24 Moderate

>= 25 High

09. March 2012 NIST Fake Detection WS 5 
Elapsed Time

Elapsed Time Factor Value

<= one day 0

<= one week 1

<= two weeks 2

<= one month 4

<= two months 7

<= three months 10

<= four months 13

<= five months 15

<= six months 17

> six months 19

09. March 2012 NIST Fake Detection WS 6 
Expertise and Knowledge of TOE

Expertise Factor Value

Layman 0

Proficient 3(1)

Expert 6

Multiple experts 8

Knowledge of TOE

Public 0

Restricted 3

Sensitive 7

Critical 11

(1) When several proficient persons are required to complete the attack path, 

the resulting level of expertise still remains “proficient” (which leads to a 3 

rating).

09. March 2012 NIST Fake Detection WS 7 
Window of Opportunity and Equipment

Window of Opportunity Factor Value

Unnecessary / unlimited access 0

Easy 1

Moderate 4

Difficult 10

None (2)

Equipment Factor Value

Standard 0

Specialised 4(3)

Bespoke 7

Multiple bespoke 9

(2) Indicates that the attack path is not exploitable due to other measures in the 

intended operational environment of the TOE. 

(3) If clearly different test benches consisting of specialised equipment are required for 

distinct steps of an attack, this should be rated as bespoke.

09. March 2012 NIST Fake Detection WS 8
#### Charles T. CLARK, Claimant-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 04-7029.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 14, 2004.

ON MOTION

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Crystal Cannan

National Safety Council

Director, Workplace Training & Survey Services

Crystal Cannan leads the NSC Workplace Training and Survey Services group that helps 

organizations assess, benchmark, and improve their safety management systems and safety culture 

through safety perception surveys and training. For eleven years, Crystal has managed the technical 

and operational components involved in all phases of the employee survey consulting services. 

Crystal has experience working with hundreds of organizations, across industries, in conducting 

safety culture surveys, interpreting survey results, consulting on survey best practices, presenting on 

safety culture, and guiding action planning initiatives. 

In addition to her work at the National Safety Council, Crystal has experience in clinical psychology, 

management, and human resources. Crystal holds a bachelor’s degree and master’s degree in 

psychology.
** **

**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Frederick F. Wolfe,certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of RealMex Restaurants, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: March 26,2008

 

 

 
| /s/ Frederick F. Wolfe  |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|
| Frederick F. Wolfe      |   |   |
|                    |   |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

VIVID SEATS LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

DIGI PORTAL LLC,

Defendant.

C.A. No. 1:20-cv-04042

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PATENT CASE

DECLARATION OF GAUTHAM BODEPUDI

I, Gautham Bodepudi, declare as follows:

1. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Declaration. I am competent 

to testify as to all matters stated, and I am not under any legal disability that would in any way 

preclude me from testifying.

2. I am a managing partner of IP EDGE LLC.

3. I live in Texas and have lived in Texas for eight years.

4. IP EDGE LLC is a Texas limited liability company with a mailing address at 5300 

N Braeswood Blvd Ste 4 -V620, Houston, TX 77096.

5. IP EDGE LLC serves as a licensing advisor for Digi Portal. IP EDGE LLC is not 

a law firm.

6. As a representative of IP EDGE, I sent a letter on behalf of Digi Portal to Vivid 

Seats LLC on June 26, 2020. My letter requested an initial response within two weeks of the date 

of the letter, i.e., July 10, 2020. I did not receive a response from Vivid Seats LLC before July 10, 

2020. 

7. Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the letter, without attached 

patents and claim charts, I sent on behalf of Digi Portal to Vivid Seats LLC on June 26, 2020. 

Case: 1:20-cv-04042 Document #: 10-4 Filed: 08/24/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:268
2

8. I am registered as an Illinois attorney; however, I do not practice law in Illinois. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that I have

signed this declaration in Austin, Texas on August 24, 2020.

Guatham Bodepudi

Case: 1:20-cv-04042 Document #: 10-4 Filed: 08/24/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:269
Article Ref: E-005 

Weights and Measures Connection, Vol. 6, Issue 4 Page 1

6/25/2015

Technical Correction to 2015 NIST Handbook 130

Uniform Engine Fuels and Automotive Lubricants Regulation

Subject: Notice of an editorial correction in Handbook 130 (2015), “Uniform Laws and Regulations in 

the Areas of Legal Metrology and Engine Fuel Quality,” Uniform Engine Fuels and Automotive Lubricants 

Regulation section.”

In the preparation of the 2015 edition of NIST Handbook 130, the following was omitted from the 

revision of Section 3.13. Oil, subparagraph 3.13.1.3. Engine Service Category, “European Automobile 

Manufacturers Association (ACEA), European Oil Sequences.” 

Correction: The subparagraph should read:

3.13.1.3. Engine Service Category. – The label on any vehicle engine (motor) oil container, receptacle, 

dispenser or storage tank and the invoice or receipt from service on an engine that includes the 

installation of bulk vehicle engine (motor) oil dispensed from a receptacle, dispenser, or storage tank 

shall contain the engine service category, or categories, displayed in letters not less than 3.18 mm (1/8 

in) in height, as defined by the latest version of SAE J183, “Engine Oil Performance and Engine Service 

Classification (Other than “Energy Conserving”),” API Publication 1509, “Engine Oil Licensing and 

Certification System,” European Automobile Manufacturers Association (ACEA), “European Oil 

Sequences,” or other “Vehicle or Engine Manufacturer Standards” as provided in Section 3.13.1.3.1. 

(Amended 2012 and 2014)

The above error will be corrected in the 2016 edition of NIST Handbook 130 and noted as an “editorial 

change” on the 2015 Editorial Changes listed in the beginning of the handbook.

This correction is also posted on the NIST Handbook 130 (2015) web page at:

http://www.nist.gov/pml/wmd/pubs/hb130.cfm
##### 



Citizens Effingham Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
 Exhibit 31.1
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Citizens Effingham Bancshares, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report.3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented in
this quarterly report;4.
    
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and I
have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared.b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
   
 
 -14-