alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### N. R. Jones, etc., *v.*E. E. Pearce.

Evidence — Establishing Testimony of Deceased Witness.

Refusal to permit a party to prove the testimony of a deceased witnesis given, on a former trial, was not error, where it does- not appear what the testimony sought to -he established was, and it appears that the witness presented to prove the testimony of -the deceased witness -can not remember all that the deceased witness testified to-, or even the substance thereof.

APPEAL PROM BATH CIRCUIT COURT.

June 13, 1873.

*Reid & Stone,*Turner, *for appellamts.*

*Lacy, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

The suppression of a part of the depositions of Shropshire and others by the court, and its refusal to permit appellant to prove what Craig, who was dead, testified to on a former trial of the case were not assigned as reasons for a new trial, and if they had been we do not perceive any error in the ruling of the court below, on those questions. The evidence offered was incompetent.

It does not appear what were the statements made by Craig on the former trial, or that they were material or beneficial to appellant; and, besides, the witness Norris, by whom appellant proposed to prove them-, stated that he could not remember all that'Jesse Craig proved on that occasion. Nlor did he say that he could prove even the substance of what the decedent stated on the occasion referred to. The two instructions given by the court presented in clear and lucid language to the jury the principles of law arising on the pleadings and evidence, and they were quite as- favorable to appellant as the testimony authorized.

The evidence was conflicting and we can not say that the verdict is against the weight of it.

Perceiving no error in the proceedings in the court below, the judgment must be *affirmed.*
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 13

- 00281

- CV

Baltazar PINEDA Jr., Appellant

v. Ruben A. Gonzalez VILLARREAL d/b/a Perico ’ s Transfer and Genaro Escobedo Rodriguez, Appellees

From the 111th Judicial District C ourt, Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010

- CVE

- 001451

- D2 Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 19, 2013

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.1(a)(1). Appellant also requests that each party be ordered to bear its own appellate costs.

However, the motion does not disc lose an agreement of the parties regarding the assessment of

costs ; accordingly , all costs of appeal will be assessed against appellant. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.1(d) (absent agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against appellant).

PER CURIAM
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL**

**FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this annual report of Profire Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the *"Report"*), I, Andrew Limpert , Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date:  | July 8, 2009 |   | By:    | /s/ Andrew Limpert      |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |         |   |   | Andrew Limpert          |   |
|   |         |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |
|        |              |        |        |                         |        |  |
<PAGE>   1



Exhibit 11


                            PROMUS HOTEL CORPORATION
                       COMPUTATIONS OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              Three months ended March 31,
                                                 1998          1999
                                                -------      ------- 

<S>                                             <C>          <C>    
Net income                                      $36,016      $34,042
                                                =======      =======


 Basic Earnings per Share:

  Weighted average outstanding shares            86,415       83,616
                                                =======      =======
  Net income per basic share                    $  0.42      $  0.41
                                                =======      =======

Diluted Earnings per Share:

  Weighted average outstanding shares            86,415       83,616
  Effect of dilutive securities:
    Stock options and warrants                    1,224          445
                                                -------      -------
  Weighted average shares assuming
    conversion                                   87,639       84,061
                                                =======      =======
  Net income per diluted share                  $  0.41      $  0.40
                                                =======      =======
</TABLE>


                                       29
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Patriot Scientific Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification
      is
      an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of Patriot Scientific
      Corporation does hereby certify, pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
      and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
      18
      of the United States Code 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      November 27, 2006




/s/
                Thomas J. Sweeney
              
              Thomas
                J. Sweeney
              *Chief
                Financial Officer*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

VALENTINO ROSSI, )

) Case No. 20-cv-4828

Plaintiff, ) 

)

) Judge Thomas M. Durkin

v. )

)

THE INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, )

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, )

PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED )

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED )

ON SCHEDULE A HERETO, )

)

Defendants. )

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff VALENTINO ROSSI

hereby dismisses without prejudice all causes of action in the complaint against all the remaining

Defendants identified in Schedule A. Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs.

The respective Defendants have not filed an answer to the complaint or a motion for summary 

judgment in this matter. Therefore, it is respectfully submitted that dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is 

appropriate.

Consistent herewith, Plaintiff consents to the Court closing the case for administrative purposes. 

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: November 30, 2020 By: s/Michael A. Hierl _ 

Michael A. Hierl (Bar No. 3128021)

William B. Kalbac (Bar No. 6301771)

Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd.

Three First National Plaza

70 W. Madison Street, Suite 4000

Chicago, Illinois 60602

(312) 580-0100 Telephone

mhierl@hsplegal.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

VALENTINO ROSSI

Case: 1:20-cv-04828 Document #: 33 Filed: 11/30/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:2494
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned attorney hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of 

Voluntary Dismissal was filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court and served on all counsel of 

record and interested parties via the CM/ECF system on November 30, 2020.

s/Michael A. Hierl

Case: 1:20-cv-04828 Document #: 33 Filed: 11/30/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:2495
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
          Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of  Section  1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned officer of MAXXAM Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does
hereby certify that:

     (a) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2005 of the Company (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: March 14, 2006

                                           /S/          PAUL N. SCHWARTZ
                                      ---------------------------------------------
                                                        Paul N. Schwartz
                                                        Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code).
```
Environmental Testing 

Methodology in Biometrics 

Belen Fernandez-Saavedra, 

R. Sanchez-Reillo, R. Alonso-Moreno, O. Miguel-Hurtado

GUTI 

University Group for Identification Technologies 

University Carlos III of Madrid 

Tlf.: +34 91 624 88 08 Fax: +34 91 624 94 30 

{mbfernan,rsreillo,ramoreno, omiguel}@ing.uc3m.es 
Environmental Evaluation 

IBPC 2010 

NIST 

Environmental factors Test instruments 

Biometric system 

Users Test methodology 

Scenario 1 

Performance 

Scenario 2 rates 

Standard Scenario 

DET 

FMR 

FNMR 

Belen Fernandez-Saavedra – GUTI (UC3M) 2 
●

Defined considering the environmental 

parameter under study

Three kinds of environmental scenarios

•Operational range

•Extreme conditions

•Free conditions

•This parameter shall be set to an specific value

•The rest of them shall be kept inside the range

defined in the standard scenario

Environmental Scenarios 

IBPC 2010 

NIST 

●

Belen Fernandez-Saavedra – GUTI (UC3M) 3 
Biometric Evaluation 

IBPC 2010 

NIST 

Biometric evaluations 

“end-to-end” 

● Specific requirements the 

environmental tests: 

• Environment: particular scenario to test 

• Users: special guides and training 

• Acclimatization 

• Data collection: matching scores and environmental 

data collected at the same moment 

• Performance metrics: they shall be calculated for 

different scenarios 

for performing 

Scenario evaluations 

Operational evaluations 

Belen Fernandez-Saavedra – GUTI (UC3M) 4 
THANK YOU 

FOR YOUR ATTENTION 

Belen Fernandez-Saavedra, 

R. Sanchez-Reillo, R. Alonso-Moreno, O. Miguel-Hurtado 

GUTI 

University Group for Identification Technologies 

University Carlos III of Madrid 

Tlf.: +34 91 624 88 08 Fax: +34 91 624 94 30 

{mbfernan,rsreillo,ramoreno, omiguel}@ing.uc3m.es
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Douglas Canas

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04937

Honorable John Robert Blakey

Smithfield Packaged Meats Corp.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, January 7, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Preliminary settlement

discussion held both jointly and separately with the parties by telephone. The Court will

allow Defendant some additional time to confer with its client before responding to the

Court's question posed during the private session. Preliminary settlement call with

Defendant's counsel only set for 1/14/21 at 10:00 a.m. Lead counsel is instructed to

promptly call into the Court's conference call−in number at (888) 684−8852, and use

Access Code 7354516. Mailed notice(lxs, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
EXHIBIT A

Case: 1:20-cv-05084 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/28/20 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:6

EXHIBIT AEXHIBIT A

Case: 1:20-cv-05084 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/28/20 Page 2 of 14 PageID #:7

EXHIBIT AEXHIBIT A

Case: 1:20-cv-05084 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/28/20 Page 3 of 14 PageID #:8

EXHIBIT AEXHIBIT A

Case: 1:20-cv-05084 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/28/20 Page 4 of 14 PageID #:9

EXHIBIT AEXHIBIT A

Case: 1:20-cv-05084 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/28/20 Page 5 of 14 PageID #:10

EXHIBIT AEXHIBIT A

Case: 1:20-cv-05084 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/28/20 Page 6 of 14 PageID #:11

EXHIBIT AEXHIBIT A

Case: 1:20-cv-05084 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/28/20 Page 7 of 14 PageID #:12

EXHIBIT AEXHIBIT A

Case: 1:20-cv-05084 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/28/20 Page 8 of 14 PageID #:13

EXHIBIT AEXHIBIT A

Case: 1:20-cv-05084 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/28/20 Page 9 of 14 PageID #:14

EXHIBIT AEXHIBIT A

Case: 1:20-cv-05084 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/28/20 Page 10 of 14 PageID #:15

EXHIBIT AEXHIBIT A

Case: 1:20-cv-05084 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/28/20 Page 11 of 14 PageID #:16

EXHIBIT AEXHIBIT A

Case: 1:20-cv-05084 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/28/20 Page 12 of 14 PageID #:17

EXHIBIT AEXHIBIT A

Case: 1:20-cv-05084 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/28/20 Page 13 of 14 PageID #:18

EXHIBIT AEXHIBIT A

Case: 1:20-cv-05084 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/28/20 Page 14 of 14 PageID #:19
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

USA

Plaintiff(s),

v.

Jacob Mathley 

Defendant(s).

Case No. 20 CR 585

Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer

ORDER

Government's unopposed motion for an extension of time to indict pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 

3161(h)(7)(A), to and including November 2, 2020 [10] is granted. Enter Order.

Date: 9/16/2020

Rebecca R. Pallmeyer

United States Chief District Judge

Case: 1:20-cr-00585 Document #: 12 Filed: 09/16/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:39
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 608

Providing for a committee of two Members to be appointed by the House

to inform the President that the House of Representatives has completed

its business.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 20, 1998

Pursuant to H. Res. 594; considered as having been adopted

RESOLUTION

Providing for a committee of two Members to be appointed

by the House to inform the President that the House

of Representatives has completed its business.

1 Resolved, That a committee of two Members of the

2 House be appointed to wait upon the President of the

3 United States and inform him that the House of Rep4 resentatives has completed its business of the session and

5 is ready to adjourn, unless the President has some other

6 communication to make to them.

Æ
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant toSection 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Joseph J.Kwederis, certify that:

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PliantCorporation;

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))**forthe registrant and have:

(a)           Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b)           Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)           Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter  that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)           Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: May 15, 2007 |                      |
|-------------------------|---------------------------|
|                    | /s/ JOSEPH J.  KWEDERIS   |
|                    | Joseph J. Kwederis        |
|                    | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

#  

----
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF W&T OFFSHORE, INC.

The
subsidiaries of W&T Offshore, Inc. are listed below.



|                                 |  |                      |  |              |  
|-------------------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | ------------ | -
|Name                             |  | State ofOrganization |  | PercentOwned |  
|N.O. Properties LLC              |  | Delaware             |  | 100.0        | %
|W&T Energy VI, LLC               |  | Delaware             |  | 100.0        | %
|W&T Energy VII, LLC              |  | Delaware             |  | 100.0        | %
|White Shoal Pipeline Corporation |  | Delaware             |  | 73.4         | %
Engineered atoms for precision measurement of fundamental atomic constants

NIST researchers have discovered that atoms prepared in special quantum states may offer a greatly 

superior platform for making precision measurements of atomic properties. In joint work of the Atomic 

Spectroscopy Group and the Fundamental Constants Data Center, it has been demonstrated, based on 

quantum electrodynamics (QED) theory, that an atom consisting of a nucleus and a single electron in a socalled circular state can be described more simply than atoms in general. Circular states are weakly-bound 

Rydberg states in which orbital angular momentum is high. These properties greatly reduce perturbations 

from the nuclear charge distribution and from interactions with virtual photons. This means that 

comparisons between measurements and QED calculations are more direct, contain fewer uncertainties, 

and may lead to superior values of fundamental constants and atomic structure parameters. 

NIST researchers plan to realize the creation and measurement of circular atoms by uniting three powerful 

NIST measurement competencies: the NIST Electron Beam Ion Trap (EBIT), optical cooling and trapping, 

and the optical frequency comb. The EBIT will be used to strip a selected atom of all its electrons, 

followed by attachment of a single electron in a circular Rydberg orbit. The high charge state of the ion 

leads to large enough energy differences between Rydberg states that optical techniques like laser cooling 

and trapping can be used to cool and hold the atom for measurement. The optical frequency comb can then 

be brought to bear on the measurement of transition energies in order to determine fundamental constants. 

The initial goal is to obtain an alternative determination of the Rydberg constant with the eventual prospect 

of improving the precision of both the Rydberg and fine structure constants. 

Figure 4.2: (a) In a circular state, an electron (black dot) orbits far from the nucleus (red and grey core). (b) 

The electron probability density of a circular state is constrained to a circle about the nucleus. (c) In a 

highly-charged ion, the optical frequency comb can be used to make ultra-precise measurements of 

Rydberg transition frequencies, which when compared to QED theory determine the value of the Rydberg 

and fine structure constants. 

Contact: Dr. Joseph N. Tan 

301-975-8985 

Joseph.Tan@nist.gov
Affiliate Members

October 2023

AFFILIATES

Mohammed Almazrouei

Gail Anderson

Kelly Ayers

Kristina Baucom

Adam Becnel

Thomas Bellinger

Ashley Cape

Erin Casey

Christine Craig

Teresa Devitt-Lynch

Kim Duddy

Amanda Fitch

Karen Green

Martin Hall

Brian Hudson

Eugene Liscio

James Loftis

Peter Massey

Aldo Mattei

Kimberlee Sue Moran

Pedram Nabegh

Guy Nutter

Bryon O’Neil

Christine Picard

Prem Rachakonda

Ryan Rezzelle

Elizabeth Richards

Michael Russ

Michelle Sanford

Bob Scurlock

Shannon Shafer

Kimberley Shapiro

Scott Skinner

Aaron Tarone

April Taylor

Toby Terpstra

Rachel Touroo

Christian Vlautin

Jeffrey Wells

Troy Wilson

Neil Zielinski
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Standard Companies Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending
September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frederic M. Poses, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Frederic M. Poses  
|Frederic M. Poses      
|Chief Executive Officer



October 25, 2005