alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 15.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

eLong, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statement (No. 333-126381) on Form S-8 of eLong, Inc. of our reports dated June 24, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of eLong, Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, shareholders equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007, which reports appear in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 20-F of eLong, Inc. Our report on the consolidated financial statements refers to (i) a change in the method of accounting for employee based
arrangements as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, effective January 1, 2006; and (ii) a change in presentation of business tax and surcharges as permitted
by Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No.06-3, How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That is, Gross versus Net Presentation).



|                
|----------------
|/s/    KPMG     
|Hong Kong, China
|June 27, 2008
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Standard Companies Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frederic M. Poses, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Frederic M. Poses  
|Frederic M. Poses      
|Chief Executive Officer



July 26, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         262,207
<SECURITIES>                                     1,827
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               267,597
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 267,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,921
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,241
<OTHER-SE>                                     205,435
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   267,597
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,047
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                82,245
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 721
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (107,292)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (107,292)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (107,292)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
#### REBECCA DUNKLEY v. LEE H. SHOEMATE, ERIC B. MUNSON, DAVID S. JANOWSKY, PRESTON A. WALKER, MARY F. LUTZ, DOE ONE, DOE TWO, and DOE THREE

No. 28PA97

(Filed 6 June 1997)

On writ of certiorari pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-32(b) to review an order of the Court of Appeals, entered 9 December 1996, dismissing the plaintiff’s appeal. Heard in the Supreme Court 14 May 1997.

*Law Offices of Grover C. McCain, Jr., by Grover C. McCain, Jr., and Frank W. Hallstrom, for plaintiff-appellant.*

*Patterson, Dilthey, Clay & Bryson, L.L.P., by Robert M. Clay, for defendant-appellee Shoemate.*

*Bailey & Dixon, L.L.P., by Gary S. Parsons and Kenyann G. Brown, on behalf of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and the Alliance of American Insurers, amici curiae.*

PER CURIAM.

The interlocutory order of the superior court, from which the plaintiff appealed, affects a substantial right which the plaintiff will lose if the order is not reviewed before final judgment. *Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.,*294 N.C. 200, 240 S.E.2d 338 (1977); *Highway Commission v. Nuckles,*271 N.C. 1, 155 S.E.2d 772 (1967). It was error to dismiss the appeal. We reverse the order dismissing the appeal and remand to the Court of Appeals for a hearing on the merits.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Small Business: Endocrinology, Metabolism, Nutrition, and Reproductive Sciences.                    

*Date:*                         November 14, 2014.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dianne Hardy, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 6175, MSC 7892, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-1154,                         *dianne.hardy@nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations, imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

Dated: November 13, 2014.

Carolyn Baum,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2014-27344 Filed 11-18-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              OCT-03-1998
<CASH>                                            104
<SECURITIES>                                      358         
<RECEIVABLES>                                     293
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                     1,124
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0 
<PP&E>                                          1,915
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (866)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  4,122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             177
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (1,424)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    4,122
<SALES>                                         2,428 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                3,067
<CGS>                                           1,986         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,986 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,342
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   95
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 44
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (400)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      306
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (706)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    (706)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (19.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (14.16)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-40060

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OCTAVIO GONZALEZ-CARRANZA,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

No. 2:10-CR-893-1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Octavio Gonzalez-Carranza has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 22, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-40060 Document: 00511610529 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/22/2011
No. 11-40060

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Gonzalez-Carranza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 11-40060 Document: 00511610529 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/22/2011
#### Samuel Harbitt’s Adm’r *v.*F. M. Curl.

Bills and Notes — Defense—Illegal Transaction.

The defense that the note sued on was given for a horse sold and purchased with the intent and knowledge of both buyer and seller that the horse was to be used to enable the purchaser to' carry on war against the United States is a valid defense.

APPEAL PROM HARRISON' CIRCUIT COURT.

December 24, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

In the amended answer it is alleged that at the time the note sued on was executed the intestate himself was engaged in acts of hostility against the United States, and sold said horse to the defendant to assist him, and that he might be enabled to engage in acts of war as a soldier of the Confederate States against the United States, and that said defendant did so engage, and did use said horse as cavalry horse in said Confederate army.

The language not only charges the vendor of the horse with a knowledge of the purchase, but that he sold him to the purchaser *150to enable him- to carry out his illegal purpose, and thus participated in th-e accomplishment of the illegal -acts of engaging in a war against the government, which presented a good defense to the action according to the authorities recognized by this and other courts.

*Grifdtt, for appellant.*

*West, Cleay, for appellee.*

The facts proved conduced to show that the intestate participated with appellee in carrying out the illegal purpose for which the horse was purchased. At all events we can not say that there is such a failure of evidence on that point as to authorize this court to interfere.

Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed.*
EXHIBIT 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, Frederic M. Poses, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of American StandardCompanies Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and
1

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: July 29, 2004   By: /s/ Frederic M. Poses  Frederic M. Poses Chief Executive Officer
2
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    | /s/   GEOFFREY S.M. HEDRICK |   |
|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
|   | GEOFFREY   S.M. HEDRICK     |   |
|   | CHIEF   EXECUTIVE OFFICER   |   |
|   | May 10,   2011         |   |
|   |                        |   |
|   |                        |   |
|   | /s/   RONALD C. ALBRECHT    |   |
|   | RONALD   C. ALBRECHT        |   |
|   | CHIEF   FINANCIAL OFFICER   |   |
|   | May 10,   2011         |   |

 

1

----
#### George MILLER, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Howard PAINTER, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 04-7341.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 2004.

Decided Dec. 22, 2004.

*262George Miller, Appellant pro se. Dawn Ellen Warfield, Office of the Attorney General of West Virginia, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Based on his informal brief, it appears that George Miller, a state inmate, seeks to appeal the state trial court’s October 26, 1998, order denying post-conviction relief. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. *See*28 U.S.C. §§ 1291-96 (2000). To the extent that Miller seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr.,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (I960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on April 17, 2003. The notice of appeal was filed, at the earliest, on August 18, 2004. Because Miller failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. 40-8943; ASLBP No. 08-867-02-OLA-BD01]

## Notice of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Reconstitution

Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.313(c) and 2.321(b), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (Board) in the above-captioned license renewal proceeding for the In Situ Leach Facility, Crawford, Nebraska is hereby reconstituted by appointing Administrative Judge Richard E. Wardwell to serve on the Board in place of Administrative Judge Richard F. Cole.

                    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall continue to be filed in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule.                     *See*10 CFR 2.302*et seq.*

Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 18th day of November 2014.

E. Roy Hawkens,

Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.

[FR Doc. 2014-27792 Filed 11-21-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
TGDC Meeting, July 2011

Marginal Marks Research

David Flater, Ph.D.

Computer Scientist, Software and Systems Division, ITL

http://vote.nist.gov

*

TGDC Meeting, July 2011

Page *

Overview
        - Investigate the development of a standard reference set of ballot markings representative of the types of marks that voters make on each common type of optical scan / marksense ballot
        - The objective is to provide Voting System Test Labs and acceptance testers with a test set that they can use to test and document the responses of scanners
        - Marginal marks are included, but it's not just about them

TGDC Meeting, July 2011

Page *

Status
        - Task 1 (data collection) is complete, and the report is available on the vote.nist.gov web site
        - Task 2 (analysis and classification of marks) encountered complications, but is now wrapping up.  Interim reports have been received, and a complete report is expected soon
        - Task 3:  Identification of test set of marks
        - Task 4:  Design and validation of standard reference marks

TGDC Meeting, July 2011

Discussion/Questions

Page *
Subject: CSF 2.0
Date: Wednesday, April 26, 2023 1:04:38 AM

Dear Team.
Lines below my comments:

Table 1: Discussion Draft NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 Core: Function and Category Names and
Identifiers

[-] Govern (GV) -> align categories to COBIT 2019 Focus Area — Information Security
- Add Category: People, Skills and Competences

- Change category: Policies and Procedures -> Principles , Policies and Procedures

[-] Protect | Detect | Respond | Recover -> This functions must have capabilities of Lessons Learned.
The principal reason is because have relations with a failure or lack of one or many controls.

[-] Protect : Add category about security development (APP Security). In this new category we would
talk about devsecops, SAM, etc.
Thanks for this opportunity.

José Carlos

José Carlos Vargas Medina
’ T

Pacifico

oO _ |