alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,829
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,509
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,894
<PP&E>                                           7,105
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,307
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 103,792
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,994
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      71,160
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   103,792
<SALES>                                         68,602
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                68,602
<CGS>                                           49,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,267
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  78
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    425
<INCOME-TAX>                                       679
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (254)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (254)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

FRED J. DE LA COTERA, D.D.S., 

individually and as the representative of a 

class of similarly-situated persons,

Plaintiff,

v.

NOAH ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED, 

a Wisconsin corporation,

 Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-05036

 

 

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff, FRED J. DE LA COTERA, 

D.D.S., through his undersigned attorneys, hereby dismisses this action with prejudice, class 

allegations without prejudice, each side to bear its own costs. 

 Respectfully submitted,

FRED J. DE LA COTERA, D.D.S.

By: s/ Ryan M. Kelly

Ryan M. Kelly 

ANDERSON + WANCA

3701 Algonquin Rd., Ste. 500

Rolling Meadows. IL 60008

Telephone: 847-368-1500

Fax: 847-368-1501 

rkelly@andersonwanca.com

Case: 1:20-cv-05036 Document #: 5 Filed: 10/13/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:33
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 13, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing Joint 

Stipulation of Dismissal with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send 

notification of such filings to all counsel of record.

/s/Ryan M. Kelly

 

Case: 1:20-cv-05036 Document #: 5 Filed: 10/13/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:34
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 20697 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

EDGAR ALEJANDRO SILVA LOPEZ ,
Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:18

- CR

- 227

- 1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Edgar Alejandro Silva Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Silva Lopez h a s not file d a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 7, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-20697 Document: 00514988497 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/07/2019No. 18

- 20697

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-20697 Document: 00514988497 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/07/2019
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Ealy v. EVC Engage, LLC

Appellate case number: 01-21-00095-CV

Trial court case number: 2020-09144

Trial court: 334th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas

Appellant Lawrence Ealy’s motion for en banc reconsideration is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Amparo Guerra

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 2, 2023

En banc court consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Kelly, Goodman, Hightower, 

Countiss, Rivas-Molloy, Guerra, and Farris.

Justice Landau not participating.
#### Leroy H. Follis *v.*John N. Follis, etc.

Trusts- — Property Conveyed to Wife.

Property conveyed to a wife decided to be -beld by ber in trust for her husband, and subject to payment of his debts.

APPEAL PROM -CAMPBELL CIRCUIT COURT.

January 14, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

The evidence wholly fails to sustain the view that appellee John N. Follis was in a condition financially to make a settlement of the property claimed by his wife on her. If he and his partner had a capital of $10,000 in their business and made the profit of $7,000 within the space of less than two years, they have been unable, or at least they have wholly failed, to give any consistent and *313intelligent account of the manner in which the original capital or the profits have been disposed of.

*Hallam & Hallam, for appellant.*

*Hawkins, for appellee.*

In 1864 the personal estate given in by N. Fallís to the assessor of the town of Wilmington, Ohio, which seems then to have been the residence of Fallís and wife, for taxation, amounted to the sum of $350, and from1 the evidence it appears that a piano worth some $400 or $500 was the only valuable personal, estate of the. wife that the witnesses knew anything about, and that she may have yet.

In 1862 it appears by an instrument in the nature of a mortgage on real estate near to or in Wilmington, Mrs. A. E. Farris loaned to her husband $709, to secure which said instrument was executed. Then that must have been the extent of his indebtedness to her, as she only included that sum. On the 2d of August she, by her writing endorsed on the mortgage, released the same, reciting that it was for value received.

A. S. Berry proves he sold the lots in Bellevue to J. N. Fallís for $1,200; that he paid him for them1 and he knew no one else in the transaction. Also that he was the agent who negotiated the sale of the Timberlake property. He sold it to J. N. Fallís, who paid $1,200. He (Berry) went his surety for $800 to Timberlake, the balance of the first payment, and he transacted the business with Mr. Fallís and made the deed to the Bellevue lots to Mrs. Fallís by the direction of her husband.

It is apparent from the evidence that Mrs. Fallís has secured to her a much larger amount in the Timberlake house than she has shown she advanced to her husband, and that the Bellevue lots and the lot conveyed to her by Raipe are held in trust for her husband, and should be subjected to the payment of appellant’s demand.

Wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to sell so much of the Bellevue lots and the lot in Newport conveyed by Raipe to Mrs. A. E. Fallis as will be sufficient to satisfy appellant’s debts, and for further proceedings consistent herewith.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                    89,957
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,678
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  95,678
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,759
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                      88,885
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    95,678
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   980
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,315
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,711)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       452
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,163)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,163)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (5.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.24)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.2

Eastern Division

Brogwley Russell, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−00420

Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt

City of Chicago, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, October 7, 2024:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Defendant's Motion for

Summary Judgment [278] is taken under advisement. Briefing will proceed according to

the previously set schedule [277], with responses due by 11/1/24, and replies due by

12/3/24. The Court will rule by mail. Emailed notice. (cdh, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-00420 Document #: 281 Filed: 10/07/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:4976
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4044

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 

to designate California State Route 99 as a high priority corridor on 

the National Highway System. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 25, 2004

Mr. NUNES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency 

Act of 1991 to designate California State Route 99 as 

a high priority corridor on the National Highway System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ADDITION OF CALIFORNIA ROUTE 99 TO THE 

4 NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM. 

5 Section 1105(c) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor6 tation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2032; 112 Stat. 

7 191; 118 Stat. 293) is amended by adding at the end the 

8 following new paragraph: 
2

•HR 4044 IH 

1 ‘‘(46) The California Farm-to-Market Corridor. 

2 California State Route 99 from south of Bakersfield 

3 to Sacramento, California.’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Western Division

Tricia Marvin

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 3:20−cv−50293

Honorable John Z. Lee

Mercy Health Corporation, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, August 28, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: : This case is dismissed without

prejudice pursuant to Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal [9]. Civil case terminated.

Mailed notice(ca, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 3:20-cv-50293 Document #: 10 Filed: 08/28/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:106
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mercari Communications Group, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Scott L. Mathis, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Scott L. MathisScott L. MathisTitle: Chief Executive OfficerDate: January 07, 2011








This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 16, 2013 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00960-CV 

CONNIE LOOP, CONNIE LOOP RNFA, LLC, AND SURGICAL STAFFING, LLC 

D/B/A TX SURG. SERVICES, LLC, Appellants 

V. 

DR. DOUGLAS S. WON, MDCL CONSULTING, LTD., 

AND SKW PARTNERS, LP, Appellees 

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-11494 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Moseley, Bridges, and Lang-Miers 

Opinion by Justice Bridges 

Before the Court is appellants’ July 24, 2013 motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellants 

have informed the Court that the parties have settled their differences. Accordingly, we grant 

appellants’ motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). 

130960F.P05 

 

/David L. Bridges/ 

DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

CONNIE LOOP, CONNIE LOOP RNFA, 

LLC, AND SURGICAL STAFFING, LLC 

D/B/A TX SURG. SERVICES, LLC, 

Appellants 

No. 05-13-00960-CV V. 

DR. DOUGLAS S. WON, MDCL 

CONSULTING, LTD., AND SKW 

PARTNERS, LP, Appellees 

 On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas. 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-11494. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. 

Justices Moseley and Lang-Miers, 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 Subject to any agreement between the parties, it is ORDERED that appellees, DR. 

DOUGLAS S. WON, MDCL CONSULTING, LTD., AND SKW PARTNERS, LP, recover their 

costs of this appeal from appellants, CONNIE LOOP, CONNIE LOOP RNFA, LLC, AND 

SURGICAL STAFFING, LLC D/B/A TX SURG. SERVICES, LLC. 

Judgment entered August 16, 2013 

/David L. Bridges/ 

DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Ecolocap Solutions Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Michel St-Pierre, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 14th day of April, 2011.








MICHEL ST-PIERREMichel St-PierreChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of BLACKWATER MIDSTREAM CORP. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K/A for the year ended MARCH 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael D. Suder,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  July
      2, 2009
                
                By:
      /S/ MICHAEL D.
      SUDER
                Michael
      D. Suder
                Chief
      Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.3


 


October 14, 2005


 


Mr. John Hupalo


Executive Vice President
- Capital Markets


 


John,


 


This letter will
constitute an amendment to your employment offer letter of February 24,
2003 and is being offered as additional consideration for your execution of The
First Marblehead Invention, Non-Disclosure, Non-Competition and
Non-Solicitation Agreement (the “Agreement”).


 


In the event that you are
terminated by the company for any reason other than cause, First Marblehead
will provide you with severance which includes salary and benefits (per the
terms of the benefit plans) for one year. 
Cause shall mean (I) the substantial failure to perform your duties to
FMC which failure is not cured within 30 days of receipt of notice from FMC
describing in reasonable detail such failure, (II) a breach of your fiduciary
duties to FMC or (III) the conviction of a crime that constitutes a felony.


 


Please note that this
amendment does not constitute an employment contract or a contract for a
specific term of employment and that the employment relationship is at
will.  Please acknowledge this notice by
signing one copy and returning it to me.


 


	
  Sincerely,

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Robin Camara

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Robin Camara

  	
   

  
	
  Sr. Vice President –
  Human Resources

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
    /s/ John Hupalo

  	
   

  	
  11/7/05

  	
   

  
	
  John Hupalo

  	
  Date Signed

  	
   

  
	
  Executive Vice
  President - Capital Markets

  	
   

  
					



 


 


cc:  H. R. file


 


1
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-4069

___________

Roy Duane Reha; David Lee Waddell, *

*

Appellants, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Southern

v. * District of Iowa.

*

Hardee's Food Systems, Inc., sued as * [UNPUBLISHED]

Hardee's Restaurants Inc., *

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: April 21, 1999

Filed: April 22, 1999

___________

Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Roy Duane Reha and David Lee Waddell appeal the district court's order

dismissing Reha's and Waddell's complaint after they failed to comply with the court's

order directing them to submit an amended complaint in compliance with Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). The district court warned Reha and Waddell that their

complaint would be dismissed if they failed to comply with Rule 8(a), and having

reviewed the record, we find no abuse of discretion. See Mangan v. Weinberger, 848

F.2d 909, 911 (8th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1013 (1989). We affirm the

district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.6.3

Eastern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cr−00394

Honorable John F. Kness

Darryl Collins

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, September 6, 2022:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Jury Trial held on 9/2/2022

and continued to 9/7/2022 at 09:00 AM (Courthouse closed on 9/5/2022 and 9/6/2022).

Mailed notice (jk)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
Exhibit 13.1







SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Vuance Ltd. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: July 22, 2010

/s/ Ron PeerBy: Ron PeerTitle: Chief Executive Officer




Dated: July 22, 2010

/s/ Eyal TuchmanBy: Eyal TuchmanTitle: Director




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.