alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.3**

 
|  | **Aston Bell**

Certified  Public Accountant |
|--|----------------------------------------------|

 
| 545 8th Avenue, Suite 402     |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|
| New York, NY 10018                 |   |
| Tel. (212) 957-7385                |   |
|                               |   |
| 17 Academy Street, Suite 1008 |   |
| Newark, NJ 07102                   |   |
| Tel. (973) 824-5832                |   |

 

**Independent Accountant’s Report**

 

LehmanABS Corporation, as Depositor

745Seventh Avenue

NewYork, New York 10019

 

U.S.Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee

CorporateTrustDepartment

100Wall Street

NewYork, NY 10005

 

Re:          Corporate Backed Trust Certificates,Goldman Sachs Capital I Securities-Backed Series 2004-7 Trust (the “Trust”)

 

Ladiesand Gentlemen:

 

Wehave examined assertions of Lehman ABS Corporation (the “Depositor”) and U.S.Bank National Association, (the “Trustee” and, together with the Depositor, the “Management”)that the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects,with the provisions of the Standard Terms for Trust Agreements dated asof January 16, 2001, as supplemented by a series supplement dated as of April 30,2004 (together, the “Trust Agreement”) in respect of the Corporate Backed TrustCertificates, Goldman Sachs Capital I Securities-Backed Series 2004-7Trust (the “Trust”), during the period covered by the annualreport on Form 10-K filed by the Depositor on behalf of the Trust for theyear ended December 31, 2009 (the “Annual Report”). Management is responsiblefor compliance with the Trust Agreement. Our responsibility is to express anopinion on Management’s assertions based on our examination.

 

Ourexamination was made in accordance with standards established by the AmericanInstitute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on atest basis, evidence about the Depositor’s and the Trustee’s compliance withthe Trust Agreement and performing such other procedures as considerednecessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examinationprovides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

TheDepositor is a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., which filed avoluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Untied States Code in theUnited States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of**New York on September 15, 2008. Also, The Trust assets are held by theTrustee through an account at the Depository Trust Company. No liens, encumbrances,or adverse interests have been placed upon the assets of the Trust.

 

1

----

 

Inour opinion, the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, inall material respects, with the Trust Agreement during the period covered by theAnnual Report and Management’s assertions with respect to such compliance are fairly stated,in all material respects, for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

 
| Aston  Bell CPA      |   |
|----------------------|--------|
| New  York, New York  |   |
| March 31,  2010 |   |

 

2

----
<Page>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

    In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DoubleClick Inc.
(the 'Company') for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the 'Report'), Bruce
Dalziel, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.

                                                   /s/ BRUCE DALZIEL
                                           .....................................
                                                      BRUCE DALZIEL
                                                 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

August 14, 2002
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS-EASTERN DIVISION

VIAHART LLC 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

v. No. 20-cv-5049

 

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND Hon. Joan H. Lefkow

UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS 

IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE “A”, Mag. Judge Jeffrey Cummings 

 

 Defendants. 

NOTICE OF FILINGS

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff, by its and through its undersigned counsel, has 

filed a Motion for Leave to File Under Seal (ECF. No. 7), Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion for Entry of 

a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction and a Temporary Asset 

Restraint (ECF No. 9) (the “Motions”). Pursuant to the Fourth Amended General Order 20-0012, 

Plaintiff has not noticed the Motions for a hearing, but Plaintiff is available for a telephonic hearing 

if requested by the Court. 

Date: August 27, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/S/DALIAH SAPER

DALIAH SAPER (NO. 6283932)

MATT GROTHOUSE

BRANDON BEYMER

SAPER LAW OFFICES, LLC

505 N. LASALLE, SUITE 60654

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60654

(312) 527-4100

DS@SAPERLAW.COM

Case: 1:20-cv-05039 Document #: 12 Filed: 08/27/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:226
No. 87-6185.

#### Bright *v.*Shimoda et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kennedy took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 70166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27768]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XD582


Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery Management Council's (Pacific Council) 
Scientific and Statistical Committee Ecosystem Subcommittee 
(Subcommittee) will hold a meeting, which is open to the public.

DATES: The Subcommittee will meet Monday and Tuesday, December 15-16, 
2014. The meeting will start at 9 a.m. each day and continue until 
business is completed on each day.

ADDRESSES: 
    Meeting address: The meeting will be held in the Conference Room in 
Building 1, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Western 
Regional Center, 7600 Sand Point Way NE., Seattle, WA 98115-6349.
    Council address: Pacific Council, 7700 NE. Ambassador Place, Suite 
101, Portland, OR 97220-1384.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Kit Dahl, Pacific Council; 
telephone: (503) 820-2280 or Dr. Martin Dorn, Alaska Fisheries Science 
Center; telephone: (206) 526-6548.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Subcommittee will meet with the 
Integrated Ecosystem Assessment Team, Northwest Fisheries Science 
Center, National Marine Fisheries Service. The purpose of the meeting 
is to review the indicators used in the Annual State of the California 
Current Ecosystem Report, which is delivered to the Pacific Council 
each March, and consider how the report might be refined and improved.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in the meeting agenda 
may be discussed, those issues may not be the subject of formal action 
during the meeting. Action will be restricted to those issues 
specifically listed in this document and any issues arising after 
publication of this document that require emergency action under 
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act, provided the public has been notified of the intent to 
take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Mr. Kris Kleinschmidt at (503) 820-2280 at least 
5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: November 19, 2014.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-27768 Filed 11-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7117

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MELVIN ANTONIO BURL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District

Judge. (CR-99-176, CA-03-444-02)

Submitted: October 20, 2003 Decided: November 20, 2003

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin Antonio Burl, Appellant Pro Se. James Ashford Metcalfe,

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Melvin Antonio Burl seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion as untimely. Burl’s

§ 2255 motion was received in the district court shortly after the

expiration of the one-year limitations period. Under Houston v.

Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988), and its progeny, a prisoner’s § 2255

motion is considered filed as of the date he delivers it to prison

officials for mailing. See Burns v. Morton, 134 F.3d 109, 112-13

(3d Cir. 1998). The record does not reveal when Burl delivered the

motion for mailing to the court. Accordingly, we remand the case

to the district court for the limited purpose of determining when

Burl delivered his motion to prison officials for mailing. The

record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for

further consideration. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

REMANDED
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3882

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt from the harbor 

maintenance tax certain truck cargo on a ferry operating between two 

ports for the sole purpose of bypassing traffic congestion on the nearest 

international bridge serving the area in which such ports are located. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 3, 2004

Mr. ENGLISH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 

from the harbor maintenance tax certain truck cargo 

on a ferry operating between two ports for the sole 

purpose of bypassing traffic congestion on the nearest 

international bridge serving the area in which such ports 

are located.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3882 IH 

1 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN FERRY BORNE 

2 TRAILER CARGO FROM HARBOR MAINTE3 NANCE TAX. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4462 of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 (relating to definitions and special 

6 rules) is amended by redesignating subsection (i) as sub7 section (j) and by inserting after subsection (h) the fol8 lowing new subsection: 

9 ‘‘(i) EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN FERRY BORNE

10 TRAILER CARGO.—

11 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The tax imposed by section 

12 4461(a) shall not apply to cargo which is qualified 

13 ferry trailer cargo. 

14 ‘‘(2) QUALIFIED FERRY TRAILER CARGO.—For 

15 purposes of paragraph (1), the term ‘qualified ferry 

16 trailer cargo’ means cargo which is on or in a truck 

17 trailer or semitrailer parked on a ferry which is op18 erating between two ports for the sole purpose of 

19 transporting such trailers and trucks between such 

20 ports due to traffic congestion on the nearest inter21 national bridge serving the area in which such ports 

22 are located.’’. 

23 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

24 subsection (a) shall apply to port use after December 31, 

25 2004.

Æ
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Michael Cannon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Solectron Corporation on Form 10-Q
for the three-month period ended February 25, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Solectron Corporation. Date: April 14, 2005 /S/     Michael CannonMichael CannonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Fiscal Year 2021 Agency Report

1. Please provide a summary of your agency’s activities undertaken to carry out the provisions of 

OMB Circular A-119, “Federal Participation in the Development and Use of Voluntary Consensus 

Standards and in Conformity Assessment Activities” and the National Technology Transfer and 

Advance Act (NTTAA). The summary should contain a link to the agency’s standards-specific 

website(s) where information about your agency’s standards and conformity assessment related 

activities are available. 

The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “Commission”) is an independent agency of the United States 

Government charged with enforcing competition and consumer protection laws. The Commission’s 

primary contact with voluntary consensus standards and the organizations that produce them is in 

connection with the enforcement of the Federal Trade Commission Act, which prohibits unfair methods 

of competition and unfair or deceptive acts and practices in or affecting commerce. Consistent with its 

statutory authority, the Commission occasionally has promulgated consumer protection regulations that 

incorporate voluntary consensus standards. See, e.g., 16 C.F.R. § 306.5 (provision of FTC’s “Fuel Rating 

Rule”); 16 C.F.R. § 460.5 (provision of FTC’s “R-Value Rule”). FTC staff monitors complaints about 

products and may conduct investigations, including testing, to ensure accurate labeling or advertising. 

The Commission does not participate in the standards development activities of voluntary consensus 

standards bodies.

To carry out the provisions of OMB Circular A-119, the FTC has designated the Deputy General Counsel 

for Legal Counsel as its Agency Standards Executive. The FTC’s Office of the General Counsel, under the 

direction of the Agency Standards Executive, provides advice to FTC staff regarding implementation of 

revised OMB Circular A-119.

2. Please keep track changes on to record or rescind any new government-unique standards (GUS) 

your agency began using in lieu of voluntary consensus standards (VCS) during FY 2021. Please note, 

GUS which are still in effect from previous years should continue to be listed, and you do not need to 

report your agency’s use of a GUS where no similar VCS exists.

Number of GUS in FY2021: 0
Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 472-6 Filed: 10/29/21 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:12894
	
 


 !"##$%& #'()(*(+,-.#,-.#,-//012345*67,+-8,.9 3((:;3 .(
((-<6)8#0=)8# 

>>>?@ABCD?EFG?@A>@HI?IJH?@ABCD?EFG?@A KLMNOPQRSTUVUWXWVYUZ[\ ]^_``abc defghijklmno pq rstuvq wxyz rs{| }~ rs W ZVW`  UVUWXWVYUW[   U ZV W UVUWXWVYUW[    ZZU U UVUWXWVYUV[    ZUZZV WW UVUWXWVYUV[   Z Z`U`Z  UVUWXWVYUV[   ` Z`UUW U UVUWXWVYUV[    Z`UU U` UVUWXWVYUV[    Z`VUU Z UVUWXWVYUV[    Z`VV W UVUWXWVYUV[   WV Z`VWVW W UVUWXWVYUV[   WW ZZU`  UVUWXWVYUV[   WU ZZU  UVUWXWVYUV[   W ZZU V UVUWXWVYUV[   W Z` WU UVUWXWVYUV[   WZ ZZ` UW UVUWXWVYUV[   W` ZWZ` UW UVUWXV`YV[   W ZWW  UVUWXVUYUZ[   W ZWUZ  UVUWXVUYUZ[   W ZVZ U UVUWXVUYUZ[   UV Z`WV Z UVUWXVUYUZ[   UW ZWU UW UVUWXVUYUZ[   UU ZVW  UVUWXVUYUZ[   U Z`ZUV V UVUWXVUYUZ[   U ZZW UV UVUWXVUYUZ[   UZ ZZWVZ W` UVUWXVUYUZ[   U` ZZ ` UVUWXVUYUZ[   U ZV ` UVUWXVUYUZ[   U ZWVZ  UVUWXVUYUZ[   U ZV U UVUWXVUYUZ[   V Z W UVUWXVUYUZ[   W Z`Z` UU UVUWXVUYUZ[   U Z`ZV WV UVUWXVUYUZ[    Z`ZVV U UVUWXVUYUZ[    Z``W Z UVUWXVUYUZ[   Z Z` W UVUWXVUYUZ[   ` Z`UV  UVUWXVUYUZ[    Z`W`  UVUWXVUYUZ[    Z`WUZZ WW UVUWXVUYUZ[    ZZZ WZ UVUWXVUYUZ[   V ZZZ`V U UVUWXVUYUZ[   W ZZ`U  UVUWXVUYUZ[   U ZZ W UVUWXVUYUZ[    ZW` W UVUWXVWYUW[  

No. App./Reg. No. Intl. Class Filing Date Mark Name of Applicant

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 472-6 Filed: 10/29/21 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:12895
	
 


 !"##$%& #'()(*(+,-.#,-.#,-//012345*67,+-8,.9 3((:;3 .(
((-<6)8#0=)8# 

>?@ABCCDEABFGH

II JKLMNJNI KO NONLPOLQNLR STU VW IJ JNOJKXMK KX NONOPLNQLOR STYZ [S\]^_`abcdefg Ih IMNiiIKL KX NONOPOhQLhR STU [SjTUabcdeklfg IM IJiLJhIN KJ NONOPOIQNhR STb [Smn_`abcdefg Ii IJiOKhOL KX NONOPOIQNhR STb [Smn_`abcdefg IX IJhKIhXh KX NONOPOIQNLR STo [Spa_`abcdefg JO IJKXMJNI IL NONOPOIQLKR STq rsmtuvwxyz{|}~} L N   d_ i ¡¢LKhh£Mhi

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 472-6 Filed: 10/29/21 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:12896
	
 


 !"##$%& #'()(*(+,-.#,-.#,-//012345*67,+-8,.9 3((:;3 .(
((-<6)8#0=)8# 

>>>?@ABCD?EFG?@A>@HI?IJH?@ABCD?EFG?@A KLMNOPQRSTUVUWXWVYUZ[\ ]^_``abc defghijklmno

pqrstuuvwstxyx

z{ |}y~{  |}  |} ZW ZWVV  UVUVXVYW[  b ZU W W ` U UVWXWVYU[ ¡¢ £¤¥¦§ ̈©a«¬­® ̄° Z  WV  UVWXVYU`[ ± 23 Z Z VU  UVWXVYW[  ́μ ¶·a ̧1a«¬­® ̄° ZZ     UVW XVYV[ ± ¶±a­® ̄° Z` `Z`  UVW XVYV[ ± o»1⁄4 Z V`Z  UVW XVZYV [ 1⁄2 ¤3⁄4¿ Z  UUVVZZ U UVW`XWWYUZ[  ÀÁÂÃÄÅÆ­® ̄° Z UUVV   UVW`XWWYUZ[  ÀÁÂÃÄÅÆ­® ̄° `V UUVVUV UZ UVW`XWWYUZ[  ÀÁÂÃÄÅÆ­® ̄° `W UUV` W W UVW`XWWYUZ[  ÀÁÂÃÄÅÆ­® ̄° `U UUV`Z`  WU UVW`XWWYUZ[  ÀÁÂÃÄÅÆ­® ̄° ` UUV```  UVW`XWWYUZ[  ÀÁÂÃÄÅÆ­® ̄° ` UUV`WU U  UVW`XWWYUZ[  ÀÁÂÃÄÅÆ­® ̄° `Z UUVZU  UVW`XWWYUZ[  ÀÁÂÃÄÅÆ­® ̄° `` WZZ` U UVWXWUYW[ ± £¤¥¦ÇÈÉÊË1⁄4Ì­® ̄° ÍÍ Í W U

ÎÏÐ­S ̧ÑÒÓÔÏÕ Ö×ØÙÚÛC@ÜÝÞBß àáÎÖâãäåæçèéêëW``ì` 

No. App./Reg. No. Intl. Class Filing Date Mark Name of Applicant

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 472-6 Filed: 10/29/21 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:12897
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Mish International Monetary Inc.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04577

Honorable Gary Feinerman

Vega Capital London, Ltd., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, November 25, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Motion for leave to file [25]

is granted. For purposes of its forthcoming motion to dismiss, Defendant may file an

oversized initial brief of up to thirty pages and Plaintiff may file an oversized response

brief of up to thirty−five pages.Mailed notice.(jlj, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1504** 

JANICE WOLK GRENADIER , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, f/k/a Bierman, Geesing, Ward & Wood, LLC; HOWARD N. BIERMAN; EQUITY TRUSTEES, LLC; MARK R. GALBRAITH; WELLS FARGO; BANK OF AMERICA, f/k/a LaSalle Bank N.A., as successor

- in

- interest, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities; OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities , Defe ndants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:14

- cv - 00827

- LMB

- TCB )

Submitted : November 14, 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Janice Wolk Grenadier, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Ryan Michael, BWW LAW GROUP, LLC, Richmond, Virginia; Syed Mohsin Reza, Mary Catherine Zinsner, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Tysons Corner,2 Virginia; Nathaniel Patrick Lee, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Janice Wolk Grenadier ap peals the district court ’ s order declining to take action on her motion for reconsideration . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Grenadier v. BWW Law Group , No. 1 :14

- cv - 00827

- LMB

- TCB (E.D. Va. Ap r . 5, 2016) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### Jeffrey M. HELMEL, Claimant-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-7092.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: Oct. 21, 2004.

ORDER

Pursuant to the Court’s letter dated September 27, 2004,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

This appeal is dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

# **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

# ** **

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of 1-800 CONTACTS, INC. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended April 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert G. Hunter, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
|   | /s/  Robert G. Hunter    |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |
|   | Date:  May 11, 2006      |

 

----