alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

# AGENCY:

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (                        *Pub. L. 111-117*), the U.S. Office of Personnel Management is publishing this notice to advise the public of the availability of the FY 2013 Service Contract Inventory. This inventory provides information on FY 2013 service contract actions over $25,000. The information is organized by function to show how contracted resources are distributed throughout the agency. The inventory has been developed in accordance with guidance issued on November 5, 2010, by the Office of Management and Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). OFPP's guidance is available at                         *http://www.whitehouse.gov/​sites/​default/​files/​omb/​procurement/​memo/​service-contract-inventories-guidance-11052010.pdf.*                         The U.S. Office of Personnel Management has posted its inventory and a summary of the inventory on the Office of Personnel Management's homepage at the following link:                         *http://www.opm.gov/​about-us/​doing-business-with-opm/​contracting-opportunities/​#url=​Business-Opportunities.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

William Neal Patterson at (202) 606-1984 or by mail at U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E. Street NW., Washington, DC 20415. Please cite “2013 Service Contract Inventory” in all correspondence.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

Katherine Archuleta,

 Director.

[FR Doc. 2014-27951 Filed 11-24-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6325-44-P
#### WARD v. LYALL

No. 211P97

Case below: 125 N.C.App. 732

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 June 1997. Motion by defendant to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 June 1997.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1998
<CASH>                                          66,757
<SECURITIES>                                    44,537
<RECEIVABLES>                                  162,187
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,224
<INVENTORY>                                     81,731
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               384,848
<PP&E>                                         166,050
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,548
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 544,878
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          125,022
<BONDS>                                         65,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       164,519
<OTHER-SE>                                     190,337
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   544,878
<SALES>                                        412,761
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               412,761
<CGS>                                          188,182
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  157,624
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 67,714
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,025
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             44,689
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    44,689
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 12.2
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of eLong, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)) for
the company and have:
     5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    By:
    
    /s/ Mike DoyleName:
    
    Mike DoyleTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of BLACKWATER MIDSTREAM CORP. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael D. Suder, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  May 4, 2012By:
/s/ MICHAEL D. SUDERMichael D. SuderChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32  TEMPCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tempco, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Stanley L. Schloz, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  By:/s/ Stanley L. SchlozStanley L. Schloz
President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDated:November 12, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,369,819
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,383,945
<PP&E>                                      45,539,186
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,200,405
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,722,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          240,215
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,163,749
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,722,726
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,987,738
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,890,760
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,096,978
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,096,978
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,096,978
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.6


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



   
We consent to the inclusion in this registration statement on Form S-1 (to be
filed on or about March 26, 1998) of our report dated October 3, 1997, on our
audit of the financial statements of Bayard Drilling Technologies, Inc. as of
June 30, 1997, and the six months then ended. We also consent to the references
to our firm under the caption "Independent Public Accountants."




                                             /s/ Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P.
                                             Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P.


Oklahoma City, OK
March 26, 1998
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-40060 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus OCTAVIO GONZALEZ-CARRANZA, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. 2:10-CR-893-1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *



### The attorney appointed to repre s ent Octavio Gonzalez-Carranza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

## F I L E D Sep tem ber 2 2, 2 011 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t hasd ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-40060 Document: 00511610529 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/22/2011

### No. 11-40060

California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez-Carranza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur

w ith counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issu e f o r appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See5 T H 

### C I R


### . R. 42.2.

2 Case: 11-40060 Document: 00511610529 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/22/2011
#### L. M. Lee’s Adm’r *v.*John Harper and Others.

Contracts — Made on Sunday — Ratification.

A contract made on Sunday may thereafter be ratified so as to be binding on the parties.

Contracts — Ratification—Question for Jury.

Whether a contract made on Sunday was afterwards ratified so as to bind the parties, is a question for the jury.

APPEAL FROM HICKMAN CIRCUIT COURT.

February 1, 1873.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

Conceding that the agreement by which the appellees obtained possession to run the mill race through the appellant’s land was executed on the Sabbath, if after its execution it was ratified and confirmed by the appellees, it then Recomes valid and obligatory upon them. Whether or not there was such a confirmation of the agreement after its date by the appellees is'a question for the jury to determine. The instructions to find for the defendants in the event the writing was executed on the Sabbath was erroneous, without at the same time so qualifying that instructions as to enable the jury to determine from' the evidence, whether or not it had afterwards been ratified. *Ray v. Callett,*12 B. Mon. 532.

The judgment of the court below is reversed and cause remanded *417with directions to award the appellant a new trial and for further proceedings in conformity with this opinion.

*Bullock, for appellants.-*

-, *for appellees.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of Illinois

219 South Dearborn Street

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Thomas G. Bruton 312-435-5670

Clerk

Case: 1:20-cv-05206 Document #: 81 Filed: 09/14/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:835
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Innovative Solutions andSupport, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.

 
| By:          | /s/  GEOFFREY S. M. HEDRICK |   |
|--------------|-----------------------------|--------|
|         | GEOFFREY S. M. HEDRICK      |
|         | CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND   |
|         | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER     |
|         |                        |
|         |                        |
| May  5, 2006 |
|         |                        |
|         |                        |
| /s/          | JAMES  J. REILLY            |   |
|         | CHIEF  FINANCIAL OFFICER    |
|         |                        |
|         |                        |
| May  5, 2006 |

 

1

----
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4046

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostA. Tejeda Post Office’’. New York, New York, as the ‘‘Sergeant Riayan al Service located at 555 West 180th Street in

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4046

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 555 West 180th Street in New York, New

York, as the ‘‘Sergeant Riayan A. Tejeda Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4046 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 555 West 180th Street in New York, New York,

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant Riayan

5 A. Tejeda Post Office’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Sergeant Riayan A. Tejeda Post Office’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 28,

2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 24.1




POWER
OF ATTORNEY





KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE
PRESENTS, that each person whose name appears below constitutes and
appoints Brian S. Moore and Fred L. Hite and each of them, his or her true and
lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ending January 3, 2009, of Symmetry Medical, Inc. and any or all
amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power
and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and
purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their
or his substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.





This
power of attorney has been signed as of the 6th day of March,
2009, by the following persons:


/s/  FRANCIS T.
      NUSSPICKEL
              
              /s/  FRANK TURNERFrancis
      T. Nusspickel,
                Director
              
              Frank
      Turner,
                Director/s/  STEPHEN B.
ORESMAN
              
              /s/  JAMES S. BURNSStephen
      B. Oresman,
                Director
              
              James
      S. Burns,
                Director/s/  CRAIG B. REYNOLDS
              
              /s/  JOHN S. KRELLECraig
      B. Reynolds,
                Director
              
              John
      S. Krelle,
                Director
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

ABC CORPORATION I, 

ABC CORPORATION II, 

Plaintiffs,

v. 

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND 

UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS 

IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:20-cv-4806

Judge Thomas M. Durkin

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole

DECLARATION OF CHANDLER E. STURM

I, Chandler E. Sturm, hereby declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney at Tarter, Krinsky & Drogin LLP, counsel of record for Plaintiffs

Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. (“Chic”) and Unicorn Global, Inc. (“Unicorn”, 

and collectively with Chic, “Plaintiffs”).

2. I make this Declaration in support of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion 

for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement. 

3. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the transcript of the 

October 26, 2022 deposition of Jim Gandy taken in this action.

4. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of excepts of the transcript 

of the December 2, 2022 preliminary injunction hearing in this action.

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 638 Filed: 01/25/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:16399
2

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the

foregoing is true and correct.

Dated: January 25, 2023 By: ______________________________

New York, New York Chandler E. Sturm 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 638 Filed: 01/25/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:16400
#### R. W. Murray *v.*W. H. Webb.

Set-o,ff and’Counterclaim — Subjects of.

A defense which does not grow out of the transaction set forth in the petition, and. is not in any way connected with the subject of the action, can not be a counterclaim.

Set-off and Counterclaim — Breach of Condition in Deed.

The breach of a cqndition contained in a deed, which is wholly disconnected from the original sale of the land, can be used, if at all, only as a set-off.

Set-off and Counterclaim — Liquidated Damages.

v A claim for liquidated damages can not be the subject' of a set-off unless upon the ground that the party against whom it is asserted is a non-resident, or is insolvent.

Evidence — Burden of Proof.

Where defendant sets up a breach of condition in a deed as a set-off, the burden is on him to show with reasonable certainty the amount he should receive.

APPEAL FROM BRECKTENRID'GE 'CIRCUIT COURT.

December 11, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The defense relied on in this case is in the nature of a set-off. It does not grow out of the contract or transaction set forth in the petition as the foundation’ of the plaintiff’s claim:, nor is it in any way connected with the subject of the action; hence it can not be regarded as a counterclaim: Sec. 127, Civil Code.

*199*Kincheloe & Eskridge, for appellant.*

*Sweeney & Stewart, R. H. Bowner, for appellee.*

The breach of the condition contained in the deed from Murray to Webb is totally disconnected from the original sale of the land by Webb to Murray, and if the defense can be maintained at all it must be as a set-off.

The claimi is for unliquidated damages, and can not be made the subject of a set-off, unless upon the ground that the party against whom it is asserted is a non-resident or is insolvent. *Shropshire v. Conrad, 2*Metcalfe 143.

The demurrer to the answer should have been sustained, but aside from! this the facts of the case are for the appellee.

Before the sale of the land by Webb to White and Satterfield they could have rendered the lane valueless to appellant by closing, that portion entirely on their land, and thereby as effectually preventing him' from' reaching the public road by that rotite, as was done by entirely closing it.

Besides, admitting appellant’s right to recover on his set-off, the proof does not show with any degree of certainty the amount of damage sustained. No witness makes an estimate of such amount, nor are the fact's and circumstances touching the inconvenience to which he has been subjected set out with sufficient clearness to enable the court even to approximate the amount he ought to recover.

The onus was on him not only to establish his right to a recovery, but to show with reasonable certainty the amount he should receive.

Judgment *affirmed.*