alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of DDi Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Bruce D. McMaster, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Date: August 14, 2002

By:

/s/    BRUCE D. MCMASTERBruce D. McMaster Chief
Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-591

In Re: PAMELA SUE ERVIN, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-97-1145-6, CA-97-1199-6) Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 1, 1998 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Pamela Sue Ervin, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Pamela Sue Ervin filed a petition for a writ of mandamus apparently seeking to have this court order the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia to enforce default judgments that Ervin obtained in that court. However, the district court subsequently vacated the default judgments pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a). Ervin’s appeal in the underlying case was dismissed by this court for want of prosecution. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Mandamus relief is only available when there are no other means by which the relief sought could be granted, see In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987), and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. See In re Catawba Indian Tribe , 973 F.2d 1133, 1135 (4th Cir. 1992). The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden of showing that she has “no other adequate means to attain the relief [s]he desires” and that her entitlement to such relief is “clear and indisputable.” Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc. , 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980). Ervin has not made such a showing. Accordingly, we deny Ervin’s petition. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument wold not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David M. Engert., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc.



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                    
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 24, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    DAVID M.
ENGERT                                             
|                         |  |  |  |     |  | David M. Engert                                                    
|                         |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3855 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3855

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   607 Pershing Drive in Laclede, Missouri, as the ``General John J. 
                         Pershing Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 607 
Pershing Drive in Laclede, Missouri, shall be known and designated as 
the ``General John J. Pershing Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``General John J. Pershing 
Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
August 1998 

NCWM Adopts L&R‘s Recommendations on Diesel Fuel

The NCWM adopted new labeling requirements for Premium Diesel Fuel that will go into 

effect on January 1, 2000. The new requirements will mean that sellers will have to deliver 

fuel that meets at least two of the five properties associated with premium fuels. The five 

properties include energy content, Cetane, fuel injector cleanliness, low temperature 

operability, and thermal stability. Sellers will have to provide this information on the 

dispenser so consumers understand the fuel properties for which they are paying a higher 

price. 

Committee Chairman Karl Angell, Jr., commended Randy Jennings, TN, Chairman of the 

Petroleum Subcommittee, and Roger Leisenring, Jr., Texaco, as well as the other members of 

the Premium Diesel Working Group for developing the recommendations and for their 

informative presentation on the proposal at the Annual Meeting. 

The NCWM also made several changes to NIST Handbook 133 and Handbook 130 

including: 

- allowing additional Maximum Allowable Variations (MAVs) for bark mulch and soils sold 

by volume (e.g., 1 MAV is now permitted for every 12 bags in the sample); 

- revising the tare procedures in NIST Handbook 133 so that inspectors may continue to use 

“Unused Dry Tare” when verifying the net weight of packages of meat and poultry in retail 

stores. 

- adopting new test procedures for determining the basis weight of paper and the volume of 

packaged firewood.
**Exhibit 13.12**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Inmarsat Leasing (Two) Limited (the“Company”) for the annual period ended 31 December 2006 (the “Periodic Report”), I, Rick Medlock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in thePeriodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Date: 29 April 2008
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3917

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostUnited States Post Office’’. Copiague, New York, as the ‘‘Maxine S. Postal al Service located at 695 Marconi Boulevard in

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3917

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 695 Marconi Boulevard in Copiague, New

York, as the ‘‘Maxine S. Postal United States Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3917 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 695 Marconi Boulevard in Copiague, New York,

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Maxine S. Postal

5 United States Post Office’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Maxine S. Postal United States Post Office’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 29,

2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 89-6 Filed: 11/22/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2526
Exhibit
23.1
  Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-1 No. 333-115602 and Form S-4 No. 333-115604) of
Grande Communications Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiary and in the related
Prospectuses of our report dated March 16, 2009, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Grande Communications Holdings, Inc. and
Subsidiary included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
  /s/ Ernst &
Young LLP
 Austin,
Texas
 March 16,
2009
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

DEBBIE HUGHEY,

Petitioner

v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL 

BOARD (ANDORRA WOODS 

HEALTHCARE CENTER GALLAGHER 

BASSETT SERVICES, ACE AMERICAN 

INSURANCE COMPANY, UNINSURED 

EMPLOYER'S GUARANTY FUND, AND 

REST HAVEN NURSING CENTER),

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 92 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of August, 2018, the Emergency Relief Request, 

Application for Post-Submission Filing of Additional Documents and Evidence in Support 

of Petition for Allowance of Appeal, and the Petition for Allowance of Appeal are DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1

Polypore International, Inc.  Chief Executive Officer Certification  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Polypore International, Inc. (the "Company") for the
period ended January 1, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Robert B. Toth, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



By:

/s/ ROBERT B. TOTH Robert B. Toth President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: February 25, 2011


---



QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Thomas J. Corcoran, Jr., certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FelCorLodging Limited Partnership;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   Date: August 4, 2004 */s/Thomas J. Corcoran, Jr.*  Thomas J. Corcoran, Jr. Chief Executive Officer ofFelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated,as general partner ofFelCor Lodging Limited Partnership
**Exhibit 10.31**
**Summary of Executive Officer Compensation**                   Agreement Annualized Stock Restricted    Officer Date Base Salary Options Stock Bonus BenefitsDr. Ginetto Addiego 02/14/05 $310,000   100,000  30,000 (1) Up to 100% of basesalary uponachievement ofcompany andpersonalperformanceobjectives. Health, dental,vision, life andlong-termdisabilityinsurance                 Dr. Fusen Chen 10/04/2004 $290,000   100,000  30,000 (2) Up to 100% of basesalary; 50% ofwhich is based onmeeting annualbookings targets;and 50% of which isbased onachievement ofcompany objectives. Health, dental,vision, life andlong-termdisabilityinsurance
(1)  10,000 shares of restricted stock shall vest per year over a three year period beginning onFebruary 14, 2005. (2)  15,000 shares shall vest on October 4, 2009, provided, however, that 7,500 shares may vestsooner upon achievement by the Company of a $2.5 billion annual revenue level (measured by thetotal of the publicly reported revenues of the Company for any four consecutive completedfiscal quarters).
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69477-69478]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27603]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the

[[Page 69478]]

assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of 
a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking 
companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies 
listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than December 18, 2014.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Yvonne Sparks, Community 
Development Officer) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. First Waterloo Bancshares, Inc., Waterloo, Illinois; to acquire 
100 percent of the voting shares of Prairie National Bank, Stewardson, 
Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 18, 
2014.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-27603 Filed 11-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Rev. 09/23/2016 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of Illinois 

219 South Dearborn Street 

Chicago, Illinois 60604 

Thomas G. Bruton 312-435-5670 

Clerk 

 Date: 7/28/20

Addressee Information: 

Andrew J. Annes 

Schenk Annes Tepper Campbell Ltd. 

311 South Wacker Drive 

Suite 2500 

Chicago, IL 60606

RE: State/Randolph, L.L.C. v. Old Navy, LLC 

USDC Case Number: 20cv4382 

Dear Counselor: 

The records of this office indicate that on 7/27/20 a notice of removal pursuant to 28 USC 

1441 et seq. was filed with this court in connection with the above referenced matter. The notice 

lists the circuit court case number as 2020 -1705453 . The documents filed with the notice of 

removal list you as counsel for the plaintiff. 

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the Local Rules of this Court require that an 

appearance form be filed by an attorney who intends to represent a party in any proceeding 

before this Court. For your convenience, a copy of this form is located on the District Court 

website at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/OnlineForms.aspx. 

 Sincerely, 

 Thomas G. Bruton, Clerk 

 By: /s/A Ellis

 Deputy Clerk 

Enclosure 

Case: 1:20-cv-04382 Document #: 6 Filed: 07/28/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:118
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Mercari Communications Group, Ltd.. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended August 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Robert W. Marsik, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: February
4, 2005 |  | By:/s/  Robert W. Marsik
      Robert W. Marsik, Chief Executive Officer
      Chief Financial Officer
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating,  acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of  this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Clean Desk/Clear Screen Security Awareness Activity

USPS's Corporate Information Security Office conducted a ‘Clean Desk/Clear Screen’ security awareness activity at the Gatehouse 

location. To provide additional awareness on best practices in maintaining proper security hygiene, the Organizational Training & 

Awareness team conducted desk drops with candy and tent cards that increased security awareness through the use of 

corresponding candy bar slogans to deliver a creative and memorable message. 

Some Sweet Tips...
CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
      AND


CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C.


SECTION
      1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
      SECTION


906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002





The
      undersigned officers each certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Internet Acquisition
      Group, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Annual Report
      on
      Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the Company.





February
      14,
      2008                                                                         /s/ Qingfu
      Ren


Qingfu
      Ren


Chief
      Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer








This
      certification accompanies the
      Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall
      not
      be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed original of this written
      statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
      acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
      within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
      906,
      has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.