alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 78**  **30**

SADAT MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. HAROLD W. CLARK E , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. John A. Gibney, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:1 4

- cv - 00 105

- JAG

- RCY )

Submitted : April 23, 2015 Decided: April 28, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Sadat Muhammad Abdullah , Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA , Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Sadat Muhammad Abdullah see ks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable j urists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on proce dural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Abdullah has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal content ions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The certification set forth below is being submittedin connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mueller WaterProducts, LLC (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “ExchangeAct”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode.

I, Dale B. Smith, the Chief Executive Officer ofMueller Water Products, LLC, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.                the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theExchange Act; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Mueller Water Products, LLC.

| Date: December 19, 2005 | By:    | /s/ DALE B.  SMITH   |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                         |   | Dale B. Smith             |
|                         |   | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                               AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Cannon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Solectron Corporation on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended
May 28, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Solectron Corporation.

Date: July 2, 2004

                                           /s/ Michael Cannon
                                           ------------------
                                           Michael Cannon
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

ZHU ZHAI HOLDINGS LIMITED and 

PETER PUI TAK LEE,

Plaintiffs / Judgment Creditors, 

v.

STEVEN IVANKOVICH, 

Defendant / Judgment Debtor. 

Case No. 20-cv-04985 

Hon. Sharon Johnson Coleman 

ORDER GRANTING CITATION RESPONDENT WALKER & DUNLOP, LLC’S 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO DEPOSIT ESCROW FUNDS WITH COURT 

REGISTRY AND FOR RELATED RELIEF

This matter coming to be heard on Citation Respondent Walker & Dunlop, LLC’s Motion 

for Leave to Deposit Escrow Funds with Court Registry and for Related Relief (the “Motion,” and 

all undefined terms herein having the meanings given them in the Motion); IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The Motion is granted.

2. Walker & Dunlop, LLC (the “Respondent”) is hereby granted leave to deposit the amount

of $1,494,619.10 (the “Escrow Funds”) with the Court registry.

3. Upon deposit of the Escrow Funds, the Respondent’s obligations under the Citation are

terminated.

ENTERED:

Date: 

Sharon Johnson Coleman 

United States District Judge

February 8, 2024

Case: 1:20-cv-04985 Document #: 296 Filed: 02/08/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:3833
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4045

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to preMokelumne River, and for other purposes. pare a feasibility study with respect to the

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4045

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to prepare a

feasibility study with respect to the Mokelumne River,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4045 EH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF MOKELUMNE RIVER RE2 GIONAL WATER STORAGE AND CONJUNCTIVE

3 USE PROJECT STUDY.

4 Pursuant to the Reclamation Act of 1902 (32 Stat.

5 388) and Acts amendatory thereof and supplemental

6 thereto, the Secretary of the Interior (hereafter in this Act

7 referred to as the ‘‘Secretary’’) is authorized to prepare

8 a feasibility study entitled the ‘‘Mokelumne River Regional

9 Water Storage and Conjunctive Use Project Study’’ for

10 a project to provide additional water supply and improve

11 water management flexibility through the development of

12 new water storage and conjunctive use programs.

13 SEC. 2. USE OF REPORTS AND OTHER INFORMATION.

14 In developing the Mokelumne River Regional Water

15 Storage and Conjunctive Use Project Study, the Secretary

16 shall use, as appropriate, reports and any other relevant

17 information supplied by the Mokelumne River Water and

18 Power Authority, the East Bay Municipal Utility District

19 and other stakeholders.

20 SEC. 3. DEADLINE.

21 The Secretary shall complete the Mokelumne River

22 Regional Water Storage and Conjunctive Use Project

23 Study and provide copies of that study to the Committee

24 on Resources of the House of Representatives and the

25 Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Sen-
3

•HR 4045 EH

1 ate not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment

2 of this Act.

3 SEC. 4. COST SHARES.

4 (a) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the

5 costs of the Mokelumne River Regional Water Storage and

6 Conjunctive Use Project Study shall not exceed 50 percent

7 of the total cost of the study.

8 (b) IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS.—The Secretary shall

9 accept, as appropriate, such in-kind contributions of goods

10 or services from the Mokelumne River Water and Power

11 Authority as the Secretary determines will contribute to

12 the conduct and completion of the Mokelumne River Re13 gional Water Storage and Conjunctive Use Project Study.

14 Goods and services accepted under this section shall be

15 counted as part of the non-federal cost share for that

16 study.

17 SEC. 5. WATER RIGHTS.

18 Nothing in this Act shall be construed to invalidate,

19 preempt, or create any exception to State water law, State

20 water rights, or Federal or State permitted activities or

21 agreements.

22 SEC. 6. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

23 There is authorized to be appropriated to the Sec24 retary $3,000,000 for the Federal cost share of the
4

•HR 4045 EH

1 Mokelumne River Regional Water Storage and Conjunc2 tive Use Project Study.

Passed the House of Representatives September 22,

2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6244

DARREL R. FISHER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. SARAH RALSTON; W. EARL BRITT; JEAN ZULA , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:18

- ct

- 03165

- FL )

Submitted : June 20, 2019 Decided: June 25, 2019

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Darrel R. Fisher , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Darrel R. Fisher seeks to appeal the district court’s order d enying relief on his
action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dism iss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Fisher v. Ralston , No. 5:18

- ct

- 03165

- FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 14, 2019) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this co urt and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

* Although the new claims raised in the amended complaint were dismissed without prejudice, the court’s order is final and appealable because Fisher cannot cure the defects simply by amending the complaint

. Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y , Inc. , 807 F.3d 619, 629

- 30 (4th Cir. 2015).
Exhibit 31

             Certification of Chief Executive and Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to Rules 13A-14 and 15D-14
                     Of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

I, Stanley L. Schloz, President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Tempco, Inc. (the "Company"), certify that:

   (1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 31, 2008 (the "Report");

   (2) Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the Report; and

   (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the
periods represented in the Report.

   (4) I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
Company and have:

      (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;

      (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in the Report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by the Report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) disclosed in the Report any change in the Company's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

   (5) I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and to the audit committee
of the board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

      (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.

Dated: January 27, 2009

By:    /s/ Stanley L. Schloz
       ---------------------
       Stanley L. Schloz
       President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

NED BIEGE, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT C. DUNN, DECEASED AND ANDREA R. DUNN,

Respondents

v.

STEVEN C. DUNN, VALARIE DUNN AND DUNN'S FARM MARKET, LLC,

Petitioners :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 435 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26th day of December, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science

Forensic Science Standards Board Meeting

February 28, 2024, 12:30 p.m. – 2:30 p.m. ET

12:30 p.m. CALL MEETING TO ORDER - ROLL CALL Andy Smith

12:35 p.m. Standards and Documents in Process [Action/Vote/Information] John Jones

1. SDO Published & OSAC Proposed

a. Registry Recirculations: 1 - VOTE: 3/4/2024 [Vote]

i. OSAC 2022-S-0036, Standard Method for the Chemical Testing of Copper and Lead from Kessler

Suspected Projectile Impacts

 

b. Registry Petitions: 1 Petition Discussions - VOTE: 3/4/2024 [Vote]

i. ASTM E3295, Guide for Using Micro X-Ray Fluorescence in Forensic Polymer Exam. Wright/Jones/Taylor

c. Registry Review: 3 New Introductions - PETITION DUE: 3/20/2024 [Review]

i. ASB 157-23, Required Components for a Proficiency Testing Program in BPA {Intro} Swofford

ii. ASTM E2224-23a, Guide for Forensic Analysis of Fibers by Infrared Spectroscopy {Intro} Taylor

iii. 2022-N-0021, Family Engagement Following a Mass Fatality Incident: Victim Information Center Conlon

BPR for Medicolegal Death Investigation Authorities {Intro}

d. Registry Management: 2 SDO Reapproved; 2 SDO Published - PETITION DUE: 3/20/2024 [Review]

i. ASTM E3115-17(23), Standard Guide for Capturing Facial Images for Use with Facial Sims

Recognition Systems

ii. ASTM E3150-18(23), Standard Guide for Forensic Audio Lab Setup and Maintenance {DE} Sims

iii. ASB 159-24, Standard for Scene Investigation & Reconstruction—Foundational Principles* {Intro} Kessler

iv. ASB 160-24, Best Practice Recommendation for Initial Response at Scenes by LEOs* {Intro} Kessler

* OSAC Proposed > SDO Published

e. FSSB Registry Continued Discussions [Action]

i. OSAC 2022-S-0024, BPR for Evaluative Forensic DNA Testimony [Attachment] A. Smith/J. Gurvis

ii. OSAC 2022-S-0029, Standard Guide for Interpretation and Reporting in Forensic A. Smith

Comparisons of Trace Materials - FSSB Perspective - Strawpoll 2

2. Cross Cutting Documents: [Attachment]

3. Standards Open for Comment at SDOs: OSAC Website

1:45 p.m. Old Business [Information] Andy Smith

4. FSSB Participation Requirements [Attachment] A. Smith

1:50 p.m. New Business [Action/Information] Andy Smith

5. Ballot Updates [Attachment] D. Sirk

6. OPO Updates J. Jones

a. SDO Funding J. Jones

b. SDO Ambassador Program [Attachment] J. Jones

c. Resource Task Group Member Appointments J. Jones

d. FSSB 2024 Meeting Plans [Attachment] D. Sirk

e. FSSB Spring Quarterly Draft Agenda [Attachment] D. Sirk/A. Smith

f. Call for Awards A. Getz

7. FSSB’s Entity’s Implementation Status V. Desiderio

8. FSSB Task Group Activities S. Walker

a. Root Cause M. LeBeau

b. Terminology, Preferred Terms Priority [Attachment] S. Walker

c. Training Standard Task Group Updates [Attachment] RTG Liaisons
Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science

Forensic Science Standards Board Meeting

February 28, 2024, 12:30 p.m. – 2:30 p.m. ET

2:25 p.m. Action Item Recap A. Getz

2:30 p.m. ADJOURN
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. RP14-638-000; CP14-125-000; CP14-126-000]

On March 24, 2014, in Docket No. RP14-638-000, Atmos Energy Corporation (Atmos) filed a complaint against American Midstream (Midla) LLC (Midla) alleging, among other things, that Midla's open season notice and process violate the requirements of section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act. On March 28, 2014, in Docket No, CP14-125-000, Midla filed an application under section 7(b) of the NGA to abandon segments of its jurisdictional pipeline that are currently used to provide service to Atmos, as well as other shippers. Concurrently, Midla filed a prior notice filing in Docket No. CP14-126-000 requesting to abandon the remainder of its jurisdictional pipeline by sale to an affiliate. The parties in the active alternative dispute resolution proceeding have requested a meeting with Commission staff to ask procedural questions related to any forthcoming filings in the three docketed proceedings.

There will be a morning meeting on November 19, 2014 beginning at 10 a.m. in Hearing Room 5 at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC. The meeting will cover procedural questions related to any future filings. If a party has any questions and for access to the building, please contact Dispute Resolution Division, Support Specialist, Sara Klynsma, at (202) 502-8259.

                    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please send an email to                     *accessibility@ferc.gov*                     or call toll free 1-866-208-3372 (voice) or 202-208-8659 (TTY), or send a FAX to 202-208-2106 with the required accommodations.                

      ( print page 70864)    
 Dated: November 13, 2014.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2014-27551 Filed 11-26-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 13 - 00216 - CR

EZEKIEL GABRIEL WIGG INS APPELLANT
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------ FROM THE 89TH DISTRI CT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 51,027

- C

------------ 

### ORDER

------------ Appellant Ezekiel Gabriel Wiggins appeals from his conviction for indecency with a child by contact. Court

- appointed counsel for Appellant filed a brief with an attached appendix on May 5, 2014. We notified counsel the next day that the app endix contained unredacted references to the minor victim and directed counsel to file an amended appendix, redacting the minor’s identifying information, no later than May 16, 2014. See 2nd Tex. App. (Fort Worth) Loc. R. 7. Counsel failed to comply, and we again directed counsel to file an amended appendix no later than June 2, 2014. As of the date of this order, counsel has2

complied with neither directive. Accordingly, we ORDER counsel for the third time to file an amended appendix that redacts any identifying information of the minor victim no later than July 11, 2014 . If counsel again fails to comply, we will abate this appeal and remand to the trial court for appropriate act ion, including possible contempt proceedings against counsel. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b). The clerk of this court is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the attorneys of record.
DATED June 30, 2014

. PER CURIAM
#### Minerva and Archibald Woods *v.*Emma Woods.

Wills — Estate in Fee — Defeasible Upon Dying Without Child.

‘‘In the event of the death of my son John without children, then, in that event, after the death of my son John’s wife, whom I will and desire shall enjoy and have the use of said property during her life, I will all of said estate of any kind and description to my four grandchildren, share and share alike.”

Held, that as John died leaving a son, the contingency upon which the devise over of a life estate to appellee had not happened. John took the estate in fee simple.

APPEAL MERCER CIRCUIT COURT.

April 29, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

'Appellee, who is the widow of Dr. John T. Woods, deceased, bases her claim to the possession of the realty in controversy upon the following condition annexed to an estate therein devised to her said husband by the third clause of the will of his father, Archibald Woods, deceased. “In the event of the death of my son John without children, then, and in that event after the death of my son John’s present wife, whom I will and desire shall enjoy and have the use of said property during her life, I will all of said estate of any kind and description to my four grandchildren, share and share alike.”

Dr. Woods took under this will an estate in fee in the lands, defearable upon his dying without a child or children living at the time of his death. It appears from the appellees petition that he did not die childless, but left one son, the defendant, Hemy Woods. The contingency therefore upon which the devise, over of a life estate to appellee, and remainder in fee to the four grandchildren of the testator, has not happened. We are of the opinion that the testator did not intend that appellee should take the life estate unless his son John died without children. Such a devise over is wholly incompatible with an estate in fee simple and it is plain that John took an estate of that kind, to be defeated only by his dying without a child living at the time of his death. Appellee is entitled to dower in the lands, and to nothing more. The judgment is therefore reversed and the *324cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

*Hardin, Gaither, for appellants.*

*Polk, for appellee.*
PROGRESSIVE EMPLOYER MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC./TERRIE LOBB CATERING, INC. and AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA OF FLORIDA

Appellant s ,

v.

CHRISTINE GRIFFIN

,
Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 0 687

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 6, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims Margaret E. Sojourner , Judge

.

Date of Accident: June 14, 2014

.

Ben H. Cristal, of Cristal Hanenian, Tampa, and Rayford H. Taylor of Hall Booth Smith, P.C., Altanta, GA , for Appellant s

.

Bill Mc C abe, Longwood, and Pat T. Dicesare

, Lakeland, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.