alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Sample Environment update

2022

Sergiy Gladchenko
Low-temperature Goniometer
Sample Thermalization Problems at He3 and 

Dilution Refrigerators

Angle meas.

Angle 60 → 0

Angle 0 → 100

Re-condensation and 

cooling down
Goniometer Vacuum Can
Goniometer + Can Low-Temperature Test

He3 Insert cooling down Rotation
02:52 02:55 02:58 03:01 03:04 03:07 03:10

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200 Angle, Deg

Time

02:52 02:55 02:58 03:01 03:04 03:07 03:10

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9 T,K

Time

5/11/2022 11:44:21 AM 5/11/2022 11:44:48 AM 5/11/2022 11:45:15 AM 5/11/2022 11:45:42 AM 0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

 Sample Temperature

 Angle

Time T,K

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200 Angle, deg.

Pulse versus Continuous Rotation
Cryostat Rotation and Shielding
Sample Rotation and Shielding 
04:19:12 04:26:24 04:33:36

50

60

70

80 Angle, Deg

Time

04:19:12 04:26:24 04:33:36

1.450

1.455

1.460

1.465

1.470 T,K

04:26:24 04:27:07 04:27:50 04:28:34 04:29:17 04:30:00

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67 D

E

B Angle, Deg

1.450

1.455

1.460

1.465

1.470 T,K

Time

Piezoelectric Motor Operation at Low 

Temperatures
11:04 11:09 11:15 11:20 11:25 11:31

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200 Angle, Deg

B

11:04 11:09 11:15 11:20 11:25 11:31

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10 T,K

B

Time

Piezoelectric Motor Operation at Ultra-Low 

Temperatures
Auto-refill of LHe and LN system (prototype) 

• LN and LHe transfer controlled by Level Meter monitor Model 

1700 (standard equipment for SE Wet Cryostats);

• System of solenoid valves and relays start and stop the transfer 

of cryogenic liquids into the Cryostat;

• To reduce evaporation of Liquid Helium during and between the 

transfers modified transfer line has been designed;

• Automatic and semi-automatic regime of transfer will be 

available.

To Helium 

Recovery system

Check Valve 5 psi

Modification of Helium 

Transfer tube

To Helium transport Dewar

To Cryostat
Auto-refill of LHe and LN system (prototype) 

• LN and LHe transfer controlled by Level Meter monitor Model 

1700 (standard equipment for SE Wet Cryostats);

• System of solenoid valves and relays start and stop the transfer 

of cryogenic liquids into the Cryostat;

• To reduce evaporation of Liquid Helium during and between the 

transfers modified transfer line has been designed;

• Automatic and semi-automatic regime of transfer will be 

available.

To Helium 

Recovery system

Check Valve 5 psi
Auto-refill of LHe and LN system (prototype) 
Problems with 10T Magnet
Questions?
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-25-1999
<CASH>                                         112,624
<SECURITIES>                                   241,595
<RECEIVABLES>                                  188,125
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,571
<INVENTORY>                                     93,849
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               661,616
<PP&E>                                         195,683
<DEPRECIATION>                                  88,944
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 832,485
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          132,153
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       455,651
<OTHER-SE>                                     244,681
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   832,485
<SALES>                                        401,025
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               401,025
<CGS>                                          186,588
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  158,168
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,461
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 65,070
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,473
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,597
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    43,597
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.10


</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Straub Construction, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 63470

)

Under Contract No. N62473-16-C-4602 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Richard J. Pinto, Esq.

 Marks, Golia & Pinto, LLP

 San Diego, CA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

 Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Anthony Hicks, Esq.

 Trial Attorney

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE WILSON

The parties have resolved their dispute and request that the Board enter 

judgment in favor of appellant.

It is the Board’s decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the 

parties’ stipulation and agreement, that the appeal is sustained. In the nature of a 

consent judgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of

$191,420.92. Appellant has agreed to waive Contract Disputes Act interest.

Dated: December 8, 2022

OWEN C. WILSON

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

(Signatures continued)
2

I concur

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I concur

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63470, Appeal of Straub 

Construction, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: December 8, 2022

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
**Exhibit 10.14**

 

Amendment to Symmetry Medical Inc. 

2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan 

 

ThisAMENDMENT TO SYMMETRY MEDICAL INC. 2004 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN is effective as of March 21, 2005. All capitalized terms used herein and not defined shall have the meanings given to them in the Symmetry Medical Inc. 2004 Employee Stock PurchasePlan (the “Plan”). 

 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of SymmetryMedical Inc. (the “Board”) approved the Plan on December 2, 2004; 

 

WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend and restate certain provisions of the Plan; 

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

 

1. Section 9(a) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 

 

Delivery of Shares. The Company will hold in book-entry the shares of Common Stock purchased by each Participant under the Plan. Upon receipt ofwritten request from or on behalf of a Participant, the Company shall, as promptly as practicable, arrange for the delivery to such Participant (or the Participant’s beneficiary), as appropriate, or to a custodial account for the benefit ofsuch Participant (or the Participant’s beneficiary) as appropriate, of a certificate representing the shares purchased under the Plan, and the Company shall assume, for tax purposes, such Participant’s disposition of the underlying shares(unless such Participant clearly advises the Company otherwise in writing). In the event that a Participant provides a written statement of his intention not to sell or otherwise dispose of such shares as set forth in the foregoing sentence, suchParticipant shall be required to report to the Company any subsequent disposition of such shares prior to the expiration of the holding periods specified by Section 422(a)(1) of the Code. If and to the extent that such disposition imposes upon theCompany federal, state, local or other withholding tax requirements, or any such withholding is required to secure for the Company an otherwise available tax deduction, the Participant must remit to the Company an amount sufficient to satisfy thoserequirements. 

 

2. Section 15(b) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated inits entirety as follows: 

 

Requirements of Exchange Act.Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 15(a) above, in the event that Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act or any successor provision thereto (“Rule 16b-3”) provides specific requirements for the administrators of plans of thistype, the Plan shall only be administered by such body and in such a manner as shall comply with the applicable requirements of Rule 16b-3.
Warrants to purchase



 Exhibit 10.2 
  

			
	No. W-106	 	38,878 shares

  
 Avatech Solutions, Inc.

 A Delaware Corporation 
 Common
Stock, Par Value $.01 per share 
  
 Stock Purchase Warrant

  
 W. James Hindman, or bearer of this warrant, is entitled,
upon presentation of this Warrant and upon surrender of this warrant at the offices of the Company, to subscribe for, purchase and receive thirty-eight thousand eight hundred seventy-eight (38,878) shares of the Company’s common stock, for
a purchase price of sixty cents ($.60) per share, provided, however, that no fractional shares will be issued. Upon such payment, the Company agrees to cause to be issued in the name of the registered holder, or his or her nominee, a certificate or
certificates duly representing the shares so purchased. 
  
 In the
event of the declaration and payment of share dividends by the Company on its Common Stock, or any split-up of the Common Stock, or recapitalization of the Company which changes the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock, additional shares of
the Company may be deliverable to the holder of this warrant upon the exercise of it without additional consideration, or the exercise price per share may be adjusted in the appropriate manner. 
  
 The purchase privilege herein contained shall expire on June 1, 2010.

  
 Dated as of July 1, 2005. 
  

			
	Avatech Solutions, Inc.
		
	By :	 	 /s/ Donald R. Walsh


	 	 	Donald R. Walsh
	 	 	Chief Executive Officer
# ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

June 21, 2024 CR-2023-0760 M.L.B. v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court: CC-23-220) 

## NOTICE You are hereby notified that on June 21, 2024, the following action was taken in the above-referenced cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals: Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
AO 399 ( 01/09 ) Waiver of the Service of Summons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Northern District of Illinois

BelAir Electronics, Inc.

Plaintiff

V.

JEDirect Corp. and JE Products Corp.

Defendant

Civil Action No. 1 : 20- cv-03868

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Timothy J. Haller

(Name of the plaintiff's attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy ofthe complaint,

two copies of this waiver form , and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I , or the entity 1 represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case .

I understand that I , or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court's

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service .

I also understand that I , or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within

60 days from 10/07/2020 the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the

United States ). If I fail to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

9

Date : 10/19/2020 Z

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

JEDirect Corp.

Printed name of party waiving service ofsummons

Jun

PrintedWANG name

Address

18 SALEM Ln , Evanston, IL 682033

Jun. Want @ JunWANGLAWOEFICE

2243615095

E -mail address

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of CivilProcedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a summons

and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff located in

the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service , unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure.

" Good cause does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant's property .

Ifthe waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and allother defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of

a summons or of service .

If you waive service , then you must,within the time specified on the waiver form , serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the plaintiff

and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form . you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been served .

Case: 1:20-cv-03868 Document #: 28 Filed: 10/20/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:363
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PROMUS HOTEL CORPORATION FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          22,720
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  110,158
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               170,757
<PP&E>                                       1,100,658
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,481,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          156,274
<BONDS>                                        809,426
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           879
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,154,987
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,481,058
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               260,141
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  193,153
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   268
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,451
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 54,555
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,513
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,042
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,042
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.2

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code),
the undersigned officer of LG.Philips LCD Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Dated: December 7, 2006



/s/ RON H. WIRAHADIRAKSARon H. WirahadiraksaJoint Representative Director/President and Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to LG.Philips LCD Co., Ltd. and will be retained by LG.Philips LCD Co., Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAHINAH IBRAHIM, an individual, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY; TERRORIST SCREENING 

CENTER; FEDERAL BUREAU OF 

INVESTIGATION; CHRISTOPHER A. 

WRAY, in his official capacity as Director 

of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; 

KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, in her official 

capacity as Secretary of the Department 

of Homeland Security; JEFFERSON B. 

SESSIONS III, Attorney General, in his 

official capacity as Attorney General; 

CHARLES H. KABLE IV, Director, in 

his official capacity as Director of the 

Terrorist Screening Center; CARL 

GHATTAS, in his official capacity as 

Executive Assistant Director of the FBI's 

National Security Branch; NATIONAL 

COUNTERTERRORISM CENTER; 

RUSSELL "RUSS" TRAVERS, in his 

official capacity as Director of the 

National Counterterrorism Center; 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE; REX W. 

TILLERSON, in his official capacity as 

Secretary of State; UNITED STATES OF 

AMERICA, 

Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 14-16161 

14-17272 

D.C. No. 3:06-cv-00545-WHA 

Northern District of California, 

San Francisco 

ORDER

FILED

DEC 29 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

THOMAS, Chief Judge: 

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that 

these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 

35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in these cases shall 

not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. 

Judges Graber, Murguia, Owens, and Friedland did not participate in the 

deliberations or vote in these cases.
##### 



EXHIBIT 12 AMERICAN STANDARD COMPANIES INC.
COMPUTATION OF THE RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Dollars in Millions) Three MonthsFor the Years ended December 31,
    
    
    Ended March 31,2000
    
    
    2001
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2005Income from continuing
operations before income taxes
    
    $
    509.4
    
    
    $
    476.4
    
    
    $
    556.2
    
    
    $
    549.2
    
    
    $
    362.9
    
    
    $
    122.6
    
    
    $
    127.1Equity in net (income) loss of
associated companies net of dividends
received
    
    
    (8.7
    )
    
    
    (2.8
    )
    
    
    (13.5
    )
    
    
    (14.3
    )
    
    
    (15.8
    )
    
    
    (5.4
    )
    
    
    (7.3
    )Amortization of capitalized interest
    
    
    1.9
    
    
    
    2.3
    
    
    
    2.3
    
    
    
    2.3
    
    
    
    2.3
    
    
    
    .6
    
    
    
    .6Interest expense
    
    
    198.7
    
    
    
    168.7
    
    
    
    129.0
    
    
    
    117.0
    
    
    
    114.9
    
    
    
    29.3
    
    
    
    29.6Rental expense factor
    
    
    49.4
    
    
    
    53.2
    
    
    
    58.6
    
    
    
    37.5
    
    
    
    38.7
    
    
    
    9.3
    
    
    
    10.4Earnings available for fixed charges
    
    $
    750.7
    
    
    $
    697.8
    
    
    $
    732.6
    
    
    $
    691.7
    
    
    $
    503.0
    
    
    $
    156.4
    
    
    $
    160.4Interest expense
    
    $
    198.7
    
    
    $
    168.7
    
    
    $
    129.0
    
    
    $
    117.0
    
    
    $
    114.9
    
    
    $
    29.3
    
    
    $
    29.6Capitalized interest
    
    
    2.0
    
    
    
    4.8
    
    
    
    2.6
    
    
    
    0.9
    
    
    
    0.2
    
    
    
    0.1
    
    
    
    0.1Rental expense factor
    
    
    49.4
    
    
    
    53.2
    
    
    
    58.6
    
    
    
    37.5
    
    
    
    38.7
    
    
    
    9.3
    
    
    
    10.4Fixed charges
    
    $
    250.1
    
    
    $
    226.7
    
    
    $
    190.2
    
    
    $
    155.4
    
    
    $
    153.8
    
    
    $
    38.7
    
    
    $
    40.1Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (a)
    
    
    3.0
    
    
    
    3.1
    
    
    
    3.9
    
    
    
    4.5
    
    
    
    3.3
    
    
    
    4.0
    
    
    
    4.0
   a)
    
    For the purpose of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, fixed charges consist of interest on
debt (including capitalized interest), amortization of debt discount and expense, and a portion of rentals
determined to be representative of interest. Earnings consist of consolidated net income before income
taxes, plus fixed charges other than capitalized interest but including the amortization thereof, adjusted
by the excess or deficiency of dividends over income of entities accounted for by the equity method.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0253

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

KENT ALLEN TICHENOR,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until September 6, 2021, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

August 10 2021

08/10/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0253
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

# **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

# ** **

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of 1-800 CONTACTS, INC. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended April 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan C. Coon, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
|   | /s/  Jonathan C. Coon    |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   | Date:  May 11, 2006      |

 

----