alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

IN RE AMENDMENT OF RULE 20(b), 1 

MONTANA RULES OF APPELLATE 

PROCEDURE 

1 ORDER 

) NOV 09 2000 

This Court has determined that it is necessary to amend Rule 20(b) of the Rules of 

Appellate Procedure to require service of appeal briefs on the Attorney General’s office in 

termination of parental rights and abused, dependent or neglected children cases. 

Accordingly, pursuant to the authority granted this Court by Article VII, Section 2(3) of the 

Montana Constitution, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following underlined language is added 

amending Rule 20(b) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure; such amendments shall be 

(b) Service of all papers required. . . . In criminal cases appealed by the 

defendant and in aupeals relatin? to termination of parental rights and abused, 

deoendent or neglected children cases, all transcripts, briefs, motions, and 

other papers shall be served on both the county attorney and the attorney 

general. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court is directed to provide copies 

of this Order to Greg Petesch, Code Commissioner, Legislative Services Division; to The District 

Court Judges of the State of Montana; to each Clerk of the District Court of the State of Montana; 

to James H. Goetz, Chair of the Advisory Commission on Rules of Civil and Appellate Procedure; 

to the Division of Child and Family Services of the Montana Department of Public Health and 

Human Services; to George Bousliman, Executive Director of the State Bar of Montana, with 

a request that this order be published in the next available issue of the Montana Lawyer, and 
be posted on the State Bar of Montana web cite (www.montanabar.org); to the Judith 

Meadows, State Law Librarian, with the request that she post this order on the Montana Law 

Library web cite (www.lawlibrary.state.mt.us); to West Group; to State Reporter Publishing 

Company; and to the Office of the Attorney General. 

4 DATED this g-day of November, 2000. 

Justices 

2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6628

GENE THOMAS MEYER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RICHARD A. LANHAM, SR., Commissioner; J.

JOSEPH CURRAN, JR.,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA98-884-S)

Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 21, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fred Warren Bennett, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. Annabelle

Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

March 30, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on March 31, 1998. Pursuant to Rules

58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the

date that the order was physically entered on the docket sheet that

we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision.

Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Gene Thomas Meyer seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Meyer v. Lanham, No. CA-98-884-S

(D. Md. Mar. 31, 1998).* We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

HARDY WAY, LLC, )

) Case No.: 20-cv-4854

)

) Judge John Robert Blakey

Plaintiff, )

) 

v. )

)

THE INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, )

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, )

PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED )

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON )

SCHEDULE A HERETO, )

)

Defendants. )

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff HARDY WAY, LLC, 

hereby dismisses with prejudice all causes of action in the complaint against the following Defendants

identified in Schedule A. Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs.

No. Defendant

89 chanel02

90 chanel03

91 Chenmingyu0420

145 chanel01

146 Chanel04

151 hhx13420111772

152 hkx688463

153 Huangksngcal1

158 jilaolqi

253 alex_2016-08

Case: 1:20-cv-04854 Document #: 43 Filed: 10/21/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:3768
The respective Defendants have not filed an answer to the complaint or a motion for summary 

judgment in this matter. Therefore, it is respectfully submitted that dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is 

appropriate.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: October 21, 2020 By: s/Michael A. Hierl _ 

Michael A. Hierl (Bar No. 3128021)

William B. Kalbac (Bar No. 6301771)

Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd.

Three First National Plaza

70 W. Madison Street, Suite 4000

Chicago, Illinois 60602

(312) 580-0100 Telephone

mhierl@hsplegal.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

HARDY WAY, LLC

Case: 1:20-cv-04854 Document #: 43 Filed: 10/21/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:3769
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned attorney hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of 

Voluntary Dismissal was filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court and served on all counsel of 

record and interested parties via the CM/ECF system on October 21, 2020.

s/Michael A. Hierl

Case: 1:20-cv-04854 Document #: 43 Filed: 10/21/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:3770
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3947 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3947

    To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that monetary 
    benefits paid to veterans by States and municipalities shall be 
excluded from consideration as income for purposes of pension benefits 
               paid by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2004

Mr. Crowley (for himself, Mr. Evans, Mr. Sandlin, Mrs. McCarthy of New 
   York, Mr. Ruppersberger, Mr. Clay, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Frost, Mr. 
 Towns, Mr. Bishop of New York, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Owens, Mr. Ackerman, 
 Mr. Weiner, Mrs. Maloney, Mr. McNulty, Mrs. Christensen, Mr. Nadler, 
   Mr. Rangel, Mr. McHugh, Mr. Gordon, Mr. Israel, and Mr. Reynolds) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that monetary 
    benefits paid to veterans by States and municipalities shall be 
excluded from consideration as income for purposes of pension benefits 
               paid by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as ``Veterans Pensions Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN AMOUNTS FROM CONSIDERATION AS INCOME FOR 
              PURPOSES OF VETERANS PENSION BENEFITS.

    (a) Exclusion.--Section 1503(a) of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (9);
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (10) as paragraph (11); and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (9) the following new 
        paragraph (10):
            ``(10) payment of a monetary amount to a veteran from a 
        State or municipality that is paid as a veterans' benefit; 
        and''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to determinations of income for calendar years 
beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128218 Michael F. Cavanagh 

& (24) Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, WENDY BETH ADELSON, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 128218 

 COA: 258539 

Oakland CC: 01-180995-FH 

02-185164-FH 

OAKLAND CIRCUIT JUDGE,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 25, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for 

bond pending appeal is DENIED as moot. 

l0123 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 30, 2006 

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4037 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 569
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4037

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 21, 2004

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

                              June 7, 2004

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 475 Kell Farm Drive in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, as the ``Richard G. 
             Wilson Processing and Distribution Facility''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 475 
Kell Farm Drive in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Richard G. Wilson Processing and Distribution 
Facility''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Richard G. Wilson Processing 
and Distribution Facility''.

                                                       Calendar No. 569

108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4037

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 475 Kell Farm Drive in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, as the ``Richard G. 
             Wilson Processing and Distribution Facility''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 7, 2004

                       Reported without amendment
```
May 2000 

S&T Proposes Taximeter Security Vote 

The S&T Committee proposes a voting Item 354-2 modifying Taximeter Code paragraph 

S.5. Provisions for Security to permit several means of security when taximeters are 

removable from the vehicle. The “slide-mount” installation allows easy removal of 

taximeters for safe overnight storage; however, this configuration conflicts with the 

integrity of the measurement process. The current proposal in Publication 16 modifies 

S.5. to recognize security seals and electronic links or other approved means of security 

such as audit trails. 

Although Handbook 44 recognizes audit trails in G-S.8. Provisions for Sealing Electronic 

Adjustable Components and in other code sections, no specific audit trail requirements 

exist in the Taximeter Code. NEWMA believes that because of taximeter complexities, 

any language to address audit trails in the Taximeter Code should be fully developed. 

The Committee acknowledged the complexities of Taximeters and the importance of 

adequately addressing new technology. Therefore, the Committee plans to separate Item 

354-2 into two parts. Part A contains the original NEWMA proposal, and Part B includes 

provisions for audit trails to facilitate review of the issues.
Exhibit 99.3

Annual Certification

Re: Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust 2004-HE3 (the "Trust"),
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-HE3, issued pursuant
to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as May 1, 2004 (the "Pooling
and Servicing Agreement"), by and among Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc.,
as depositor (the "Depositor"), Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as
trustee (the "Trustee"), HomEq Servicing Corporation, as servicer
(the "Servicer"), and NC Capital Corporation, as responsible party

I, Arthur Q. Lyon, certify to the Depositor and the Trustee, and their
officers, directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge and intent that
they will rely upon this certification, that:

A review of the activities of the Servicer during the 2004 calendar year
and the Servicer's performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
has been made under my supervision, the Servicer has complied with the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects and, to the best
of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has materially fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout
such calendar year.

Date: March 14, 2005

HomEq Servicing Corporation
/s/: Arthur Lyon
Arthur Q. Lyon
President
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 70224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27628]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION

[OPIC-248; OMB-3420-0032]


Submission for OMB Review; Comments Request

AGENCY: Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC).

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), agencies are required to publish a Notice in the Federal 
Register notifying the public that the agency is renewing an 
information collection for OMB review and approval and requests public 
review and comment on the submission. Comments are being solicited on 
the need for the information; the accuracy of the Agency's burden 
estimate; the quality, practical utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and ways to minimize reporting the burden, 
including automated collected techniques and uses of other forms of 
technology.

DATES: Comments must be received within 60 calendar-days of publication 
of this Notice.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the subject form may be obtained from the Agency 
submitting officer.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OPIC Agency Submitting Officer: Essie 
Bryant, Records Manager, Overseas Private Investment Corporation, 1100 
New York Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20527; (202) 336-8563.

Summary Form Under Review

    Type of Request: Renewal of an information collection without 
change.
    Title: Office of Investment Policy Questionnaire.
    Form Number: OPIC-248.
    Frequency of Use: Once per investor per project.
    Type of Respondents: Business or other institution (except farms); 
individuals.
    Standard Industrial Classification Codes: All.
    Description of Affected Public: U.S. companies or citizens 
investing overseas.
    Reporting Hours: 552 (2.4 hours per project)
    Number of Responses: 230 per year.
    Federal Cost: $23,424.
    Authority for Information Collection: Sections 231, 231A, 239(d), 
and 240A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended.
    Abstract (Needs and Uses): The Office of Investment Policy 
Questionnaire is the principal document used by OPIC to prepare a 
developmental impact profile and determine the projected impact on the 
United States, as well as to determine the project's compliance with 
environmental and labor policies, as consistent with OPIC's authorizing 
legislation.

    Dated: November 17, 2014.
Nichole Cadiente,
Administrative Counsel, Department of Legal Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2014-27628 Filed 11-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3195-01-M
Exhibit 10.4.2


 


Loan No. ML0936T1A


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE AND SUPPLEMENT


 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE AND SUPPLEMENT   (this “Amendment”) is
entered into as of September 12, 2005, between MONARCH
UTILITIES I L.P. (formerly known as Tecon Water Company, L.P.), a
Texas limited partnership (the “Company”), and CoBANK,
ACB,  a federally chartered
instrumentality of the United States (“CoBank”).


 


BACKGROUND


 


The Company and CoBank are parties to a Promissory
Note and Supplement dated as of May 1, 2002 and numbered ML0936T1 (the “Supplement”).
Since the date of the Supplement, the Company has changed its name from Tecon
Water Company, L.P. to Monarch Utilities I L.P. The parties now desire to amend
the Supplement to reflect the change in the Company’s name.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for
good and valuable other consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby established, the parties agree as follows:


 


SECTION 1.         Amendment.  The
name of the Company is hereby amended from “Tecon Water Company, L.P.” to “Monarch
Utilities I L.P.”. Wherever in the Supplement the name “Tecon Water Company,
L.P.” appears, it shall be deemed to mean “Monarch Utilities I L.P.”


 


SECTION 2.         Confirmation. This Amendment reflects the entire understanding between the parties
with respect to the subject matter hereof. Except as modified hereby, the
Supplement shall remain in full force and effect as written.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date
shown above by their duly authorized officers:


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  CoBANK, ACB,

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  a federally chartered instrumentality

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  of the United States

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Illegible

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Illegible

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Vice President

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  MONARCH UTILITIES I L.P.,

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  a Texas limited partnership

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  Texas Water Services Group, LLC,

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  a Texas limited liability company

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  General Partner

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Shelley Farnham

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Shelley Farnham

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Vice President and Secretary
Exhibit 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  the undersigned  officer of ING USA Annuity and
Life Insurance  Company (the "Company")  hereby certifies that, to the officer's
knowledge,  the  Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


August 12, 2004                       By:/s/ David A. Wheat
---------------                          ---------------------------------------
    (Date)                                   David A. Wheat
                                             Director, Senior Vice President and
                                               Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Patriot Scientific Corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification
      is
      an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned officer of Patriot Scientific
      Corporation does hereby certify, pursuant to Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
      and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
      18
      of the United States Code 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      April 20, 2007


/s/
                David H. Pohl
              David
                H. Pohl
              *Chief
                Executive Officer*