alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                        EXHIBIT (24)
  
  
                      POWER OF ATTORNEY
                      -----------------
  
       Each of the undersigned directors of Massachusetts Electric Company
  (the "Company"), individually as a director of the Company, hereby
  constitutes and appoints John G. Cochrane, Patricia M. Needham, and Robert
  K. Wulff, individually, as attorney-in-fact to execute on behalf of the
  undersigned the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
  December 31, 1996, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
  and to execute any appropriate amendment or amendments thereto as may be
  required by law.
  Dated this 19th day of March, 1997.
  
  s/Urville J. Beaumont              s/John F. Reilly, Jr.
  _________________________          _________________________
  Urville J. Beaumont                John F. Reilly, Jr.
  
  
  s/Joan T. Bok                      s/Lawrence J. Reilly
  _________________________          _________________________
  Joan T. Bok                        Lawrence J. Reilly
  
  
  s/Sally L. Collins                 s/John W. Rowe
  _________________________          _________________________ 
  Sally L. Collins                   John W. Rowe
  
  
  s/Kalyan K. Ghosh                  s/Richard P. Sergel
  _________________________          _________________________
  Dr. Kalyan K. Ghosh                Richard P. Sergel
  
  
                                     s/Roslyn M. Watson
  _________________________          _________________________
  Charles B. Housen                  Roslyn M. Watson
  
  
  s/Patricia McGovern 
  _________________________
  Patricia McGovern
##### 



Exhibit 20.3 March 22, 2005 Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association
c/o JP Morgan Chase
Institutional Trust Services
500 Stanton Christiana Road, OPS4, 3rd Floor
Newark, Delaware 19713
    
    Moodys Investors Services, Inc.
ABS Monitoring Department
99 Church Street
New York, New York 10007Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
Corporate Trust & Agency Services  Structured
Finance Services
60 Wall Street, 26th Floor
MS NYC60-2606
New York, New York 10005
    
    Standard & Poors Rating Services
Asset Backed Surveillance Department
55 Water Street
New York, New York 10041Fitch Ratings
Asset Backed Securities
Auto Group  32nd Floor
One State Street Plaza
New York, New York 10004
  Re:
    Annual Statement as to Compliance for WFS Financial 2004-2 Owner Trust Dear Sir or Madam: OFFICERS CERTIFICATE Pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement (Agreement) dated as of
May 1, 2004, and to Section 3.09 of the Indenture (Indenture), dated as of the same date, the
undersigned officers of WFS Financial Inc (the Master Servicer and Administrator) certify that: (i) a review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding fiscal year and of
its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officers supervision and to the best
of such officers knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement throughout such year and no default under the Agreement has
occurred and is continuing; and (ii) a review of the activities of the Issuer during the preceding fiscal year and of its
performance under the Indenture has been made under such officers supervision and to the best of
such officers knowledge, based on such review, the Issuer has complied with all conditions and
covenants under the Indenture throughout such year. /s/ MARK OLSON
    
    
    
    /s/ J. KEITH PALMERMark Olson
    
    
    
    J. Keith PalmerSenior Vice President and Controller
    
    
    
    Senior Vice President & Treasurer
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Communications Commission
 Special Commission Meeting Scheduled for October 24, 2014 The Federal Communications Commission has canceled the Special Commission Meeting on the subject listed below, previously scheduled for Friday, October 24, 2014 at 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC. This item has been adopted by the Commission. Bureau
SubjectEnforcement
Title: Enforcement Bureau Action.Summary: The Commission will consider whether to take an enforcement action.
 Additional information concerning this meeting may be obtained from Meribeth McCarrick, Office of Media Relations, telephone number (202) 418-0500; TTY 1-888-835-5322. Federal Communications Commission. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2014-27565 Filed 11-18-14; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Rev. 11/29/2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of Illinois

219 South Dearborn Street

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Thomas G. Bruton 312-435-5670

Clerk

Date: Case Number:

Case Title: Judge: 

DOCUMENT NOT IMAGED DUE TO REASON(S) CHECKED BELOW

 Sealed or restricted document. (A court order is required to view a sealed or restricted

document.)

 Too voluminous.

 Photographs

 Civil bond$FRXUWRUGHULVUHTXLUHGWRYLHZDILQDQFLDOGRFXPHQW

 Criminal bond$FRXUWRUGHULVUHTXLUHGWRYLHZDILQDQFLDOGRFXPHQW

 Miscellaneous (MC) case

 Other:

To view the document, you must first obtain the case file at the Clerk’s Office. The Clerk’s 

Office is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30p.m. Monday through Friday except for legal 

holidays. To obtain a copy call the Clerk’s Office Copy Desk at 312-435-5699. 

Thomas G. Bruton, Clerk 

By: /s/

Deputy Clerk 

8/24/2020 1:20-cv-04077

XYZ Corporation v. The Partnerships

and Unincorporated Associations

I S lA

Robert M. Dow, Jr

✔

Roberto Perez
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40671 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ROBERTO ALMAZAN

- RODRIGUEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12

- CR

- 1902

- 2

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Roberto Almazan

- Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Almazan

- Rodriguez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 3, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40671 Document: 00513065309 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/03/2015No. 14

- 40671

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leav e to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 14-40671 Document: 00513065309 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/03/2015
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4009 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4009

  For the relief of Thomas W. Sikes and Wellington Trade, Inc., doing 
                      business as Containerhouse.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 18, 2004

 Mr. Norwood introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  For the relief of Thomas W. Sikes and Wellington Trade, Inc., doing 
                      business as Containerhouse.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of 
any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $1,500,000 to the 
persons named in subsection (b) for damages sustained by such persons 
in connection with a 1991 government contract for the purchase and 
delivery of certain ocean freight containers.
    (b) Persons to Receive Compensation.--The Secretary of the Treasury 
shall compensate the following persons under subsection (a):
            (1) Thomas W. Sikes of Cadwell, Georgia.
            (2) Wellington Trade Inc., of Cornelia, Georgia, doing 
        business as Containerhouse.

SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES.

    Payment under section 1 shall constitute full settlement of all 
legal and equitable claims by the persons named in section 1(b) against 
the United States for the damages described in section 1(a).

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY AND AGENT FEES.

    Not more than 10 percent of the payment made under section 1 may be 
paid to or received by an agent or attorney as consideration for any 
service rendered in connection with this Act. Each violation of this 
section is punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000.
                                 <all>
```
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40620 Conference Calendar

__________________ JESSE LEE WASHINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus ROBERT HERRING, Warden; UNIDENTIFIED MOORE; UNIDENTIFIED WARD, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:95-CV-337

- - - - - - - - - - (October 18, 1995) Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jesse Lee Washington appeals the district court's dismissal as frivolous of his pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP) civil rights complaint. Washington argued that he was denied access to the courts because the prison guards failed to collect the mail on November 25, 1994, thereby causing his objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation in another lawsuit to be rendered untimely.No. 95-40620 -2- An IFP claim that has no arguable basis in law or fact may be dismissed as frivolous. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d); Booker v.
Koonce , 2 F.3d 114, 115 (5th Cir. 1993). This court's review is for an abuse of discretion. Booker , 2 F.3d at 115. To prevail on a denial-of-access-to-the-courts claim, the claimant must show that he was prejudiced by the alleged violation. Henthorn v. Swinson , 955 F.2d 351, 354 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 112 S. Ct. 2974 (1992). Washington does not challenge the finding that his objections were considered even though they were filed late. Because he was not prejudiced by the alleged violation, Washington's access-to-the-courts claim fails. See Henthorn , 955 F.2d at 354. Washington's assertion that the magistrate judge entered into a conspiracy with TDCJ officials because he had lunch and coffee with them is utterly without merit. See Liteky v. United
States , 114 S. Ct. 1147, 1157 (1994). Washington's contention that he was entitled to attend an evidentiary hearing prior to dismissal of his complaint is also without merit. See Eason v. Thaler , 14 F.3d 8, 9 (5th Cir. 1994). This appeal is frivolous and is, thus, DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2; Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). We have warned Washington that frivolous appeals may result in sanctions. See Washington v. Franks , No. 95-50526 (5th Cir. Aug. 7, 1995). Because Washington has not heeded this warning, we now bar Washington from filing any civil appeal in this court without the prior written approval of a judge of the forum court, or of this court. Washington is cautioned to review all pendingNo. 95-40620 -3- appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
Description of Shurgard Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance Bonus Program



 Exhibit 10.72 
  
 Description of Sarbanes-Oxley Bonus Program 
  
 On August 10, 2005, the Audit and Compensation Committees of our board of directors approved a bonus program for
certain of our accounting, finance and other personnel in recognition of their contributions to our efforts to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Under the original terms of the bonus program, eligible employees could receive cash
bonuses on the completion of the following milestones: 
  

	(1)	the filing of our amended annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004, including management’s report on internal control over financial reporting
(the “2004 10-K/A”), on or before September 30, 2005; 

  

	(2)	the filing of our 2004 10-K/A at any time; and 

  

	(3)	the filing of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2005, including management’s report on internal control over financial reporting (the
“2005 10-K”); provided that management identifies no material weaknesses in its 2005 assessment of our internal control over financial reporting. 

  
 On October 14, 2005, in conjunction with the filing of our 2004 10-K/A, the Audit and Compensation Committees amended
the program to provide that the Company would pay the bonus amounts originally associated with the first milestone to each eligible employee at the time of and in conjunction with the filing of our 2005 10-K; provided that the employee is still
employed by us at that time. 
  
 Devasis Ghose, our chief
financial officer, is the only executive officer eligible to receive a cash bonus under the program. Under this program, Mr. Ghose received a cash bonus of $40,000 in October 2005 in connection with the filing of our 2004 10-K/A and is eligible
to receive additional cash bonuses of up to $40,000 in connection with the filing of our 2005 10-K and up to an additional $110,000 if management identifies no material weaknesses in its 2005 assessment of our internal control over financial
reporting.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Adrian Grissom, Appellant

No. 06-24-00026-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 124th District Court of 

Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 53475-

B). Panel consists of Chief Justice Stevens 

and Justices van Cleef and Rambin. 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Rambin. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed 

for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Adrian Grissom, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MAY 23, 2024

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATION


I, JOHN P. GRAZER, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
 periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Argent
 Securities, Inc. 2004-PW1:

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling
and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion is included in these
reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement and based upon my
knowledge and the annual compliance required under that agreement, and except
as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
that agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
report provided by and independent public account, after conducting a review
in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company.

<page>



Date: March 1, 2005

ARGENT SECURITIES INC.


/s/: John P Grazer
John P Grazer
CFO
EXHIBIT 12




KOGER EQUITY, INC.
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(In Thousands except Ratios)

                                                          Nine Months
                                                       Ended September 30,
                                                      2003            2002
                                                   ----------      ---------
EARNINGS:
  Net income                                         $11,382        $13,882

  Adjustments:
  Income tax (benefit) provision                         (22)           112
  Minority interest                                       --             20
  Interest expense                                    20,964         16,973
  Amortization of loan costs                           1,095            891
  Gain on sale of assets                                (589)            (2)
                                                     --------       --------

  Earnings                                           $32,830        $31,876
                                                     ========       ========

FIXED CHARGES:
   Dividends on preferred stock                      $   371        $    --
   Interest expense                                   20,964         16,973
   Amortization of loan costs                          1,095            891
                                                     --------       --------

   Total Fixed Charges                               $22,430        $17,864
                                                     ========       ========

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                      1.46           1.78
                                                     ========       ========
A signed original of thiswritten statement required by section 906 has been provided to ESG Re Limitedand will be retained by ESG Re Limited and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

**Exhibit99.3**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ESG ReLimited (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2001 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Aodh O’Murchu, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Aodh O’Murchu                     |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Aodh O’Murchu                         |
| Controller & Chief  Accounting Officer |
| May 30, 2003                               |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                          52,080
<SECURITIES>                                   106,242
<RECEIVABLES>                                  119,312
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,366
<INVENTORY>                                     46,991
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               342,644
<PP&E>                                          75,863
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,238
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 394,933
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           95,194
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       120,734
<OTHER-SE>                                     179,005
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   394,933
<SALES>                                        115,284
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,284
<CGS>                                           48,419
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,419
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,508
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   170
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  93
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,245
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,736
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,509
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,509
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .77
        

</TABLE>