alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4049 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4049

  For the relief of Ahmad Khabaz Taghizadeh and Azammolok Taghizadeh 
                                Vatani.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 25, 2004

   Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  For the relief of Ahmad Khabaz Taghizadeh and Azammolok Taghizadeh 
                                Vatani.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CITIZENSHIP FOR AHMAD KHABAZ TAGHIZADEH AND AZAMMOLOK 
              TAGHIZADEH VATANI.

    Notwithstanding title III of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1401 et seq.), Ahmad Khabaz Taghizadeh and Azammolok Taghizadeh 
Vatani shall each be considered to be a naturalized citizen of the 
United States as of the date of the enactment of this Act and shall 
each be furnished by the Secretary of Homeland Security with a 
certificate of naturalization.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4133 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4133

  To change the name of the head of household filing status to single 
parent or guardian to describe better those individuals who qualify for 
                              the status.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 2004

 Mr. Houghton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To change the name of the head of household filing status to single 
parent or guardian to describe better those individuals who qualify for 
                              the status.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as ``Filing Status Simplification Act of 
2004''.

SEC. 2. HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD FILING STATUS CHANGED TO SINGLE PARENT OR 
              GUARDIAN.

    (a) In General.--The following provisions of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 are each amended by striking ``head of a household'' each 
place it appears and inserting ``single parent or guardian'':
            (1) Subsection (b) of section 1.
            (2) Paragraphs (1) and (3) of section 2(b).
            (3) The table in section 25B(b).
            (4) Clause (iii) of section 151(c)(6)(B).
            (5) Subparagraph (C) of section 151(d)(3).
            (6) Subparagraph (A) of section 6012(a)(1).
    (b) Other Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Subparagraph (B) of section 63(c)(2) of such Code is 
        amended by striking ``head of household'' and inserting 
        ``single parent or guardian''.
            (2) Subsection (c) of section 1 of such Code is amended by 
        striking ``the head of a household'' and inserting ``a single 
        parent or guardian''.
            (3) The heading for section 1(b) of such Code is amended to 
        read as follows: ``Single parents or guardians.--''.
            (4) The heading for section 1(c) of such Code is amended by 
        striking ``heads of households'' and inserting ``single parents 
        or guardians''.
            (5) The heading for section 2(b) of such Code is amended to 
        read as follows: ``Definition of single parent or guardian.--
        ''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
exv10w1



 





Exhibit 10.1




Remote Knowledge, Inc.




Summary of Director Compensation



At the present time, all of our outside, non-employee, directors are granted 10,000 options per
quarter for the three-year terms for which they are elected. At each annual meeting, the newly
elected Class A, B, or C directors will receive the new grant upon their election with an exercise
price based on the market price for our common shares on the date of election. The chairman of our
audit committee receives an additional 5,000 options per quarter as additional compensation for the
services in that position. All of the options vest at the rate of 10,000 options per quarter served
(in arrears). Should a director resign during his term of office, all unvested options expire. The
chairman of our audit committee’s additional options vest at the rate of 5,000 per quarter in
arrears, also commencing on the date of his election.




November 14, 2005
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Marilyn Kelly

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 11, 2008 

Order 

 

December 11, 2008 

136880(8) 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

Honorable WILLIAM C. HULTGREN 

Judge, 19th District Court. 

BEFORE THE ENTIRE BENCH 

___________________________________ 

 On order of the Court, the motion by the Judicial Tenure Commission for 

leave to file a supplemental pleading is considered and it is GRANTED.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                      Certification of Chief Financial Officer
              Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of  Section  1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned officer of MAXXAM Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does
hereby certify that:

     (a) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2006 of the Company (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: April 2, 2007

                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    /S/          M. EMILY MADISON
                                                 M. Emily Madison
                                                 Interim Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code).
```
In the

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-23-00119-CR

SANTIGIE FULLAH KABIA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 102nd District Court

Bowie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20F1411-102

Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Stevens
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Santigie Fullah Kabia challenges his conviction for theft on the ground that his two-year 

sentence of confinement should run concurrently, instead of consecutively, to the sentences 

imposed in his three other companion cases.1 

We addressed this issue in detail in Kabia’s companion case in cause number 06-23-

00118-CR. For the reasons stated therein, we sustain Kabia’s point of error here. We also note 

that the judgment in this case includes two minor clerical errors also discussed in our main 

opinion in 06-23-00118-CR. 

Based on our analysis in the main opinion, we modify the trial court’s judgment in this 

case (1) to reflect that Kabia’s sentence should run concurrently to his other companion cases, 

(2) to show that Kabia pled “not true” to the State’s revocation motion, (3) to delete references to 

deferred adjudication community supervision, and (4) to read, “The trial court previously 

adjudicated guilt and assessed community supervision. Subsequently, the State filed a motion to 

revoke community supervision.” As modified, we affirm the trial court’s judgment. 

Scott E. Stevens

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: January 11, 2024

Date Decided: February 6, 2024

Do Not Publish

1

In companion cases 06-23-00118-CR and 06-23-00120-CR, Kabia appeals two other convictions for theft. In 

companion case 06-23-00121-CR, Kabia appeals a conviction for evading arrest.
#### STATE v. BROWN

No. 271P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 226

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 23 July 1997.
#### C. C. Dixon *v.*James S. Cheatham's Adm'r, etc.

New Trial — Time of Action for.

Under § 373, Civ. Code, -an action for a new -trial must be. brought within three years afiter the rendition -of -the judgment .sought to be ¡set aside.

New Trial — Pleading—Diligence.

"Where plaintiff, in a petition for a new ¡trial ¡because of newly discovered evidence, fails to allege that he made any effort to -discover *729the evidence in question, but it appeared that he accidentally found the evidence when not looking for it, but could have found it before the trial if he had looked for it, the petition i» demurrable.

APPEAL PROM HENDERSON CIRCUIT COURT.

*Sizemore, for appellant.*

*YeamaM, for appellees.*

By Subsec. 7 of Sec. 369 of the Civil Code appellant might have been entitled to- a new trial if he had alleged and shown that he had newly discovered evidence material to him- which he could not with reasonable diligence have discovered and produced at the trial.

But he fails to allege in his petition that he made any effort to discover any evidence of the payment of the money and from the statements therein made it is manifest that he accidentally and when he was not looking for said paper, found it, and could have found it before the trial if he had put himself to the trouble to look for it. The demurrer was properly sustained.

And besides such a suit as this can not be maintained unless it be brought within three years after the final judgment sought to be set aside. Sec. 373. The final judgment was rendered and the money paid more than three years before this action was instituted.

The judgment must be *affirmed.*
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant toSection 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Harold C.Bevis, certify that:

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PliantCorporation;

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

(a)           Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

 (b)          Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)           Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)           Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: May 15, 2007 |                      |
|-------------------------|---------------------------|
|                    | /s/ HAROLD C.  BEVIS      |
|                    | Harold C. Bevis           |
|                    | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (SUBSECTION (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES
                                     CODE)

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Vornado
Operating Company (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's
knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

November 4, 2004                               /s/ STEVEN ROTH
                                               ------------------------------
                                               Name:  Steven Roth
                                               Title: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steven N. Fischer, certify that:

- I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Mechanical Technology Incorporated; - Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e))  and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 
	- Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
- The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

May 2, 2005			/S/ STEVEN N. FISCHER
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 225 / Friday, November 21, 2014 / Presidential Documents 69755 

Presidential Determination No. 2014–18 of September 30, 2014 

Determination With Respect to the Child Soldiers Prevention 

Act of 2008 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

Pursuant to section 404 of the Child Soldiers Prevention Act of 2008 (CSPA) 

(title IV, Public Law 110–457), as amended, I hereby determine that it 

is in the national interest of the United States: to waive the application 

of the prohibition in section 404(a) of the CSPA with respect to Rwanda, 

Somalia, and Yemen; to waive in part the application of the prohibition 

in section 404(a) of the CSPA with respect to the Central African Republic 

to allow for provision of International Military Education and Training 

(IMET); to waive in part the application of the prohibition in section 404(a) 

of the CSPA with respect to the Democratic Republic of the Congo to 

allow for provision of IMET, nonlethal Excess Defense Articles, the issuance 

of licenses for direct commercial sales of U.S. origin nonlethal defense 

articles, Peacekeeping Operations (PKO) assistance, and support provided 

pursuant to section 1208 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2014 to the extent such support would be restricted by the 

CSPA; and to waive in part the application of the prohibition in section 

404(a) of the CSPA with respect to South Sudan to allow for the provision 

of PKO assistance and support provided pursuant to section 1208 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 to the extent such 

support would be restricted by the CSPA. I hereby waive such provisions 

accordingly. 

You are authorized and directed to submit this determination to the Congress, 

along with the accompanying Memorandum of Justification, and to publish 

the determination in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, September 30, 2014 

[FR Doc. 2014–27870 

Filed 11–20–14; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 4710–10 


mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with 03OB#1.EPS</GPH>
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

____________________

No. 98-1816

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

IRVIN D. WOODS,

Defendant, Appellant.

____________________

No. 98-2205

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

KEVIN B. LOCKHART,

Defendant, Appellant.

____________________

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this court issued on April 21, 2000 is amended as

follows:

Page 10, line 16 should read: ". . . U.S.S.G. §§ 5C1.2,

2D1.1(b)(6)."
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.16
                              THIRD AMENDMENT TO
                       PURCHASE AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT

     THIS THIRD AMENDMENT (the "Amendment") to the Purchase and Assumption
Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated as of December 19, 1996, by and between
PREMIER BANK, FSB, a federal savings bank organized under the laws of the United
States ("Seller"), and PREMIER BANK, formerly known as First Alliance Bank, a
commercial bank organized under the laws of the State of Georgia ("Purchaser"),
is made and entered into this 31st day of May, 1997.  Capitalized terms used
herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the
Agreement.

     WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the Agreement for the purpose
of extending the termination date thereof.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein
and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, Seller and Purchaser agree to amend the Agreement as
follows:

     1.  Section 13.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to extend the
expiration of the permissible date of Closing to August 31, 1997.

     2.  Section 14.3 of the Agreement is hereby amended to extend the automatic
termination date of the Agreement to August 31, 1997.

     3.  Except as hereinabove amended, the Agreement shall remain otherwise in
full force and effect.

     4.  This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall
constitute one and the same instrument.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has caused this Amendment to be
executed on its behalf and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed and
attested by officers hereunto duly authorized all as of the day and year first
above written.

                              PREMIER BANK, FSB

Attest:
                              By:  /s/ J. Edward Mulkey, Jr.
                                 --------------------------------------
                                       J. Edward Mulkey, Jr., President
/s/ Barbara J. Burtt
----------------------
Assistant Secretary

     [BANK SEAL]
<PAGE>
 
                              PREMIER BANK

Attest:
                              By:  /s/ J. Edward Mulkey, Jr.
                                 --------------------------------------
                                       J. Edward Mulkey, Jr., President
/s/ Frank H. Roach
--------------------
Assistant Secretary

     [BANK SEAL]

                                       2