3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION

ABC CORPORATION I, 

ABC CORPORATION II, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND 

UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS 

IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 1:20-cv-4806 

Judge Thomas M. Durkin 

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole 

NOTICE OF RECENT RELATED DECISION 

Defendant Gyroor-US (“Defendant” or “Gyroor-US”) and third-party respondents Gyroor, 

Urbanmax, GaodeshangUS, Fengchi-US, Gyroshoes, and HGSM (collectively, “Third-Party 

Respondents”) respectfully submit this Notice of Recent Related Decision in reference to Plaintiffs 

Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. (“Chic”) and Unicorn Global, Inc.’s (“Unicorn”, 

and collectively with Chic, “Plaintiffs”) pending Motion for Return of Bond (the “Motion”). [Dkt. 

No. 653-656]. 

Since briefing of the Motion, a third-party petitioner Loeb & Loeb LLP (“Loeb”) has brought 

a Petition in the United States District Southern District of New York to confirm an arbitration award 

and enter judgment against Plaintiffs for $3,057.294.79 in damages, $330,941.77 in pre-judgment 

interest, $44,298.97 in arbitral expenses, and $846.38 in post-judgment interest per day until the 

judgment is fully satisfied. A true and correct copy of this Petition is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 683 Filed: 12/22/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:17485
3

Previously, this Court issued a TRO and preliminary injunction orders, which were later 

reversed and vacated by the Federal Circuit. [Dkt. No. 588-590]. Meanwhile, the case is still pending 

on the merits. Defendants and Third-Party Respondents might seek damages based on the notion 

that they were “wrongfully enjoined or restrained,” as provided in Rule 65(c). This possibility 

justifies the continuation of the bond. Now, with another arbitration award sought against Plaintiffs, 

releasing the bond posted as security would jeopardize the ability of Defendants and Third-Party 

Respondents to recover their damages. As these issues remain unresolved, the bond needs to remain 

in place. 

Date: 12/22/2023 /s/ Na Zhang 

GLACIER LAW LLP 

506 Second Ave., Ste 1516 

Seattle, WA 98104 

queena.zhang@glacier.law 

206-397-8633 

GLACIER LAW LLP 

200 E. Randolph Dr., Ste. 5100 

Chicago, IL 60601 

Ruoting Men, Esq. 

ruoting.men@glacier.law

Tianyu Ju, Esq. 

iris.ju@glacier.law 

312-270-0413 

GLACIER LAW LLP 

41 Madison Avenue, Ste 2529 

New York, NY 10010 

Tao Liu, Esq. 

tao.liu@glacier.law 

Wei Wang, Esq. 

wei.wang@glacier.law 

332-777-7315 

Attorneys for Defendant and Third-Party 

Respondents

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 683 Filed: 12/22/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:17486
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this December 22, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing 

file with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, and service was perfected on all counsel 

of record and interested parties through this system, which will deliver a true and correct copy of 

the foregoing documents via CM/ECF. 

Date: 12/22/2023 /s/ Na Zhang 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 683 Filed: 12/22/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:17487