alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 24.1**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

**KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS,** thateach person whose name appears below constitutes and appoints Brian S. Mooreand Fred L. Hite and each of them, his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-factand agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for and in hisor her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the year ending December 30, 2006, ofSymmetry Medical Inc. and any or all amendments thereto, and to file the same,with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, withthe Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-factand agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform eachand every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about thepremises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could doin person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact andagents or any of them, or their or his substitutes, may lawfully do or cause tobe done by virtue hereof.

This power of attorney has been signed as of the 12th day of March, 2007, by the following persons:
| /s/ FRANCIS T.  NUSSPICKEL |   | /s/ FRANK  TURNER   |
|---------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
| Francis T. Nusspickel,          |   | Frank Turner,            |
| Director                        |   | Director                 |
|                            |   |                     |
| /s/ STEPHEN  B. ORESMAN    |   | /s/ James  S. Burns |
| Stephen B.  Oresman,            |   | James S. Burns,          |
| Director                        |   | Director                 |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit No. 99.2

           [On Letterhead of Aston Bell, Certified Public Accountant]

                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT

Corporate Asset Backed Corporation, (as Depositor)
445 Broad Hollow Road, Suite 239
Melville, NY 11747

U.S. Bank Trust National Association
Corporate Trust Services
100 Wall Street, Suite 1600
New York, NY 10005

Re: CABCO Series 2004-101 Trust (Goldman Sachs Capital I) (the "Trust")

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have examined assertions of Corporate Asset Backed Corporation (the
"Depositor") and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, (the "Trustee" and,
together with the Depositor, the "Management") that the Depositor and the
Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the provisions of the
Trust Agreement dated as of May 20, 2004, (the "Trust Agreement") in respect of
the CABCO Series 2004-101 Trust (Goldman Sachs Capital I) (the "Trust"), during
the periods covered by the annual report on Form 10-K filed by the Depositor on
behalf of the Trust for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Annual Report").
Management is responsible for compliance with the Trust Agreement. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on Management's assertions based on our
examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Depositor's and the
Trustee's compliance with the Trust Agreement and performing such other
procedures as considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material
respects, with the Trust Agreement during the period covered by the Annual
Report and Management's assertions with respect to such compliance are fairly
stated, in all material respects, for the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ Aston Bell, CPA
-------------------

New York, New York
March 25, 2005
|   | EXHIBIT 15.25 |
|--------|---------------|

 

 

Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. 

5330 East 31st Street

Tulsa, Oklahoma

We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of        the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financial information of Dollar Thrifty        Automotive Group, Inc. and subsidiaries for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,  and have        issued our report dated August 7, 2006 (February 26, 2007, as to the effects of the restatement discussed in Note 17). As indicated        in such report, because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is        included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-79603, No. 333-89189, No. 333-33144, No. 333-33146, No. 333-50800, No. 333-128714 and No. 333-136611 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Tulsa, Oklahoma

February 26, 2007
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




	 	 	 
	TO:

	 	James M. Seaver

Senior Vice President & General Manager, Americas
	 
	 	 
	FROM:

	 	Martin Richenhagen
	 
	 	 
	DATE:

	 	November 8, 2005
	 
	 	 
	SUBJECT:

	 	Memorandum of Understanding






The following provisions confirm our discussions regarding your Retirement and Severance Agreement
with AGCO.




	 	1.	 	Your current Employment Agreement dated July 1999 will terminate effective March 31,
2006. It is agreed that your duties at AGCO will end on December 31, 2005, and this will be
followed by your contractual 90-day notice period. It is further understood that you will
not be required to work that notice period. Effective April 1, 2006, you will begin a
one-year severance period during which you will be paid your regular base salary, provided
that any such amounts will be paid no later than March 15, 2007. Your eligibility to
participate in the Annual Incentive Compensation Program will terminate on December 31,
2005.






	 	2.	 	You will receive a benefit in an amount equal to the Accrued Benefit as defined under the
AGCO Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (determined as of April 1, 2006)
reduced using appropriate interest and other factors determined by the Board to reflect
commencement of such benefit prior to the attainment of age 65. Such benefit will be paid
beginning on April 1, 2008 (at age 62) in 120 equal monthly installments, with payments to
cease after the payment due for the month in which your death occurs. If you die before
receiving 120 monthly installments, then your surviving spouse will be entitled to a death
benefit equal to 50% of the remaining installments.






	 	3.	 	All insurance coverages to continue as an active employee until the end of the severance
period (March 31, 2007).






	 	4.	 	AGCO’s retiree healthcare program eligibility will begin April 1, 2007, subject to the
normal program provisions. In the unlikely event that AGCO’s retiree health care program
were to be discontinued prior to you and Susan Seaver becoming Medicare eligible, you will
be covered under the employee program. If this does occur, you will continue to pay the
retiree rate until such time as you are Medicare eligible, and at that time the program will
discontinue with no further obligation on the part of the company.






	 	5.	 	Effective December 31, 2005, you will waive all claims to LTIP IV.






	 	6.	 	AGCO will lift restrictions on remaining LTIP stock effective March 31, 2006.






	 	7.	 	Company car will be available for purchase at program rates.






	 	8.	 	Company will provide to you your current laptop computer, monitor and printer.





Please sign and return.



	 	 	 
	/s/ James M. Seaver

	 	11/08/05
	 

	 	

	James M. Seaver

	 	Date
	 
	 	 
	/s/ Martin Richenhagen

	 	11/08/05
	 

	 	

	Martin Richenhagen

	 	Date
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. No. 20 CR 575

OMAR MAANI, District Judge John R. Blakey

Defendant.

DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO MODIFY CONDITIONS OF BOND

Defendant Omar Maani, through undersigned counsel, submits the following unopposed

motion to modify the conditions of his bond in order to permit him to travel with his family to

the island of Aruba from March 26 through April 2, 2023. 

1. Mr. Maani was released on a $10,000 unsecured personal recognizance bond on

September 4, 2020, with conditions that he submit to supervision by Pretrial Services. No travel

restrictions were noted on the defendant’s appearance bond. 

2. Mr. Maani would like to take his family to the island of Aruba from March 26

through April 2, 2023. 

3. The government, by AUSA Tiffany Ardam, has no objection to this application.

4. Pretrial Services has advised that they have no objection to this application. 

5. If approved, Mr. Maani would supply Pretrial Services with a detailed itinerary of

his trip, including hotel and flight information. 

Case: 1:20-cr-00575 Document #: 40 Filed: 01/17/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:66
WHEREFORE, defendant Omar Maani respectfully moves for the Court to enter an

Order modifying the conditions of his release so as to permit him to travel to the island of Aruba

from March 26 through April 2, 2023. 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jeffrey H. Lichtman

Jeffrey H. Lichtman

Law Offices of Jeffrey Lichtman

11 E. 44th Street, Ste. 501

New York, New York 10017

Ph: (212) 581-1001

Email: JHL@jeffreylichtman.com

Attorneys for Omar Maani

Case: 1:20-cr-00575 Document #: 40 Filed: 01/17/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:67
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 17thday of January 2023, I electronically filed the

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO MODIFY CONDITIONS OF HIS BOND, with the

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following:

AUSA Tiffany Ardam

Office of the United States Attorney U.S. Pretrial Services

219 S. Dearborn, 5th Floor 219 S. Dearborn, Room 15100

Chicago, IL 60604 Chicago, IL 60604

and hereby certify that I have mailed by United States Postal Service the document to the following nonCM/ECF participants: none.

/s/ Jeffrey H. Lichtman

Jeffrey H. Lichtman

Law Offices of Jeffrey Lichtman

11 E. 44th Street, Ste. 501

New York, New York 10017

Ph: (212) 581-1001

Email: JHL@jeffreylichtman.com

Attorneys for Omar Maani

Case: 1:20-cr-00575 Document #: 40 Filed: 01/17/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:68
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
COMPX INTERNATIONAL INC.'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STAEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          50,508
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,824
<ALLOWANCES>                                       376
<INVENTORY>                                     15,896
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,509
<PP&E>                                          49,344
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,380
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 144,115
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,781
<BONDS>                                            950
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           161
<OTHER-SE>                                     123,712
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   144,115
<SALES>                                        110,513
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               110,513
<CGS>                                           73,996
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   73,996
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   140
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 956
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,368
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,278
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,222
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,222
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
FEDERAL	INFORMATION SECURITY EDUCATORS

(FISSEA)

ABOUT FISSEA

FISSEA, founded in	1987, is an	organization	run	by and for federal

government information security professionals to assist federal

agencies in strengthening their employee	cybersecurity awareness &

training	programs.

PURPOSE

• Elevate the general level of information security knowledge for

the	federal	government	and	federally	related	workforce.

• Serve as a professional forum for the exchange of information

and improvement of information security awareness and training

programs throughout the federal	government.

• Provide professional development opportunities to FISSEA

members.

• Bring together federal	information security and awareness

professionals through seasonal	forums, contests and awards, and

an annual conference.

email:	fissea@nist.gov website:	nist.gov/fissea FISSEA FAQs

	 	

		 		 	 	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	

	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	 	
FEDERAL INFORMATION SECURITY EDUCATORS

(FISSEA)

PLANNING COMMITTEE EVENTS

The FISSEA Planning Committee

develops	the agendas	for the annual

conference and forums and

conducts the annual Innovator of

the	Year	Award	and	Security

Awareness and Training Contest.

Interested	in	joining	the	Planning

Committee? Email	us at

FISSEA@nist.gov.

INNOVATOR OF THE	YEAR

AWARD

This award recognizes an	individual

who has made significant

contributions to	the strategic	

planning, building, and

management of innovative

cybersecurity awareness and

training	programs.	Nominees	can

come from the public	or private

sectors, but the FISSEA Innovator

Award is for an individual who has

made significant contributions

benefiting the public sector.

To achieve its purpose, FISSEA may

host a variety of events throughout

the	year.	Examples	of	events	include

in-person and hybrid conferences,

online forums, and special event

webinars. The FISSEA Annual

Conference is the signature event.

FISSEA events are	open	to the	

public and recorded, then shared on

the	FISSEA	website,	when	possible.

SECURITY AWARENESS AND

TRAINING CONTEST

This contest provides the

opportunity to	showcase awareness

and training items used as a	part of

cybersecurity programs in federal

government departments and

agencies. The	contest features eight

categories from FISSEA’s key areas

of Awareness and Training. FISSEA

Contest entries are judged by a

panel	of FISSEA Committee

members and the People’s Choice

Award is voted on by the public via

an online	poll.

email:	fissea@nist.gov website:	nist.gov/fissea FISSEA FAQs
August 2005 

NIST-suggested Field Standards & Calibration Intervals 

Changes to NIST Handbook 130, as adopted by the NCWM in July 2005, will allow the 

State director to establish a list of suitable standards along with appropriate calibration 

intervals. A sample list was prepared as a part of the frequently asked questions about the 

proposals and the changes that were adopted. 

The list and calibration intervals are shown below: 

Sample List of Documentary Standards That Can Be Used as 

Specifications and Tolerances for “Field Standards” 

Standards Device Calibration Interval

HB 105-1, Cast iron Class III, IIIL, IV scales 6 month to 1 year 

HB 105-1, Stainless steel Class III, IIIL, IV scales 5 year 

OIML R111, Class F1 

ASTM E 617-97, Class 2 

Class II scales 1 year 

HB 105-2, glassware Package testing 10 year 

HB 105-3, test measures 

(hand-held and 5 gal 

truck/trailer mounted) 

Gas pumps 1 year 

HB 105-3, large provers Meters 1 year 

HB 105-4, LPG provers LPG meters 1 year 

HB 105-5, stopwatches Taxi meters, timing devices, 

parking meters, laundromats 

1 year 

HB 105-6, thermometers 

ASTM E1 

Temperature corrections, 

refrigeration specs, package 

checking 

5 year 

Inspection required 

annually 

HB 105-7, small volume 

provers 

Meters 6 months, extendable 

to 1 year 

API document in 

development* 

Master Meters for petroleum 

ASTM E 74, proving rings 

and load cells 

Wheel load weighers, weight carts, 

large mass standards 

Rings: 5 years 

Cells: 6 months if 

used for wheel load 

weighers; evaluate 

with use for 

substitution weighing

HB 105-8, weight carts Vehicle scales 6 months to 1 year; 

recalibration for any 

repair 

ASTM E100, hydrometers Petroleum products; bulk oil 1 year 
Standards Device Calibration Interval

meters 

GGG – standard; 

Length standards, tapes 

Taxi meters, fabric, scale decks, 

firewood, lobster gauges 

5 years; inspection 

before use 

Containers (HB 133) Bulk mulch 

HB 44, Berry Baskets Berry quantity 

Handbook 130 previously stated that field standards must be calibrated annually. A oneyear calibration interval can be maintained for all standards if the jurisdiction chooses. 

However, the language now allows adjustment of field standard calibration intervals 

based on historical calibration data. Intervals could be increased for standards such as 

stainless steel weights, or decreased for standards such as weight carts or cast iron 

weights. State directors would also be able to reference documentary standards other than 

NIST documents when defining specifications for field standards. 

There are some standards currently used in field testing that have no corresponding NIST 

standard that defines their specifications and tolerances. Recognizing the use of ASTM, 

OIML or other suitable documentary standards fill the void.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 21, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-11036 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ARMANDO DURAN, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-69-ALL-M

-------------------- Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Armando Duran appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry after a previous deportation. Duran argues that the district reversibly erred under United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), by sentencing him pursuant to a mandatory application of the Sentencing Guidelines. There was no “ Booker ” error or Sixth Amendment violation because the only enhancement to Duran’s sentence was for his prior conviction. See Booker , 125 S. Ct. at 756, 769.No. 04-11036 -2- Nevertheless, the district court committed “ Fanfan ” error by sentencing Duran pursuant to a mandatory guidelines scheme. See United States v. Walters , 418 F.3d 461, 463-64 (5th Cir. 2005). The Government concedes that Duran preserved his Fanfan claim. As such, this court reviews the claim for harmless error.
See Walters , 418 F.3d at 464. There is no indication in the record that the district court would have imposed the same sentence had the guidelines been advisory rather than mandatory. Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. Duran next argues that his sentence is unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), because it was based on the facts of a prior conviction what were not alleged in the indictment, admitted by Duran, or proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. Duran’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Duran properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres , but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. Accordingly, Duran’s conviction is affirmed.
AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART.
**Exhibit 31**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Stephen Linehan, certifythat:

 

1.             I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and allreports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed inrespect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, ofCapital One Auto Finance Trust 2004-A;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports,taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading asof the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the servicing informationrequired to be provided to the Indenture Trustee by the Servicer under the Saleand Servicing Agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in thesereports;

 

4.             Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliancestatement included in the reports and required to be delivered to the IndentureTrustee in accordance with the Sale and Servicing Agreement, and except asdisclosed in the reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under theSale and Servicing Agreement; and

 

5.             The reports disclose all significant deficienciesrelating to the Servicer’s compliance with the minimum servicing standardsbased upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, afterconducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Programfor Morgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling andservicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

 

 
| Date: March 31, 2005 | By:                                | /s/ Stephen Linehan |   |
|----------------------|------------------------------------|---------------------|--------|
|                 | Stephen Linehan                    |
|                 | Treasurer                          |
|                 | Capital One Auto  Receivables, LLC |

 

----