alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted), Carlos A. Rivas, the Chief Executive Officer of Verenium Corporation (the Company), and John A. McCarthy, Jr., the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic
Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 9, 2007



|                                                |  |  |  |                                                     
|----------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ CARLOS A. RIVA                              |  |  |  | /s/ JOHN A. McCARTHY, JR.                           
|Carlos A. Riva                                  |  |  |  | John A. McCarthy, Jr.                               
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filling of Verenium Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form
10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 24, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-41070 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANTONIO MORA-MERAZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-02-CR-26-1

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Antonio Mora-Meraz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Mora-Meraz has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from furtherNo. 02-41070 -2- responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
May 1998 

All Vehicle Tank Meters Must Have Ticket Printers 

After January 1, 1999 

The Office of Weights and Measures has received numerous inquiries about how to apply 

Handbook 44, Vehicle-Tank Meters Code [3.31.] paragraph UR.2.2. Ticket Printer; 

Customer Ticket. The requirement in paragraph UR.2.2 for vehicle-mounted metering 

systems to be equipped with a ticket printer contains two enforcement dates. Paragraph 

UR.2.2. is enforceable for 1) devices manufactured within a State, 2) new and used 

devices brought into a State, and 3) devices in noncommercial applications placed into 

commercial use after January 1, 1995. However, on January 1, 1999, the requirement 

becomes retroactive for all vehicle-mounted metering systems covered under code 

section 3.31. 

Initially in 1992, the National Conference on Weights and Measures (NCWM) adopted a 

requirement for vehicle-mounted liquefied petroleum gas measuring devices [See 3.32.] 

to be equipped with ticket printers. In 1993, a similar requirement was adopted for 

vehicle-tank meters; however, the NCWM permitted a phase-in period, to allow a 

reasonable amount of time for device operators to acquire ticket printer equipment. The 

NCWM recognized that most customers were not present during transactions and that 

errors occurred when transaction information was manually entered on delivery tickets. 

Therefore, the NCWM felt that ticket printers provided a timely record of the transaction 

and a means to evaluate the accuracy of delivery invoices. The NCWM also 

acknowledged that technology was available to interface ticket printers with vehiclemounted measuring systems. 

For additional discussion on the ticket printer requirement for vehicle-mounted 

applications, refer to the Reports of the 77th and 78th NCWM.
#### SUMMIT TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NIDEK CO., LTD., Nidek, Inc., and Nidek Technologies, Inc., Defendants-Cross Appellants.

Nos. 04-1494, 04-1533.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: Nov. 9, 2004.

Before NEWMAN, RADER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

*ORDER*

Summit Technology, Inc. moves to vacate the order of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in *Summit Technology, Inc. v. Nidek Co.,*No. 98-12611 (D.Mass. June 16, 2004) and to remand to the district court for further proceedings. Nidek Co., Ltd. et al. (Nidek) oppose. Summit replies.

Summit previously appealed the district court’s entry of judgment as a matter of law in favor of Nidek, and this court affirmed. *Summit Technology, Inc. v. Nidek Co.,*363 F.3d 1219 (Fed.Cir.2004). The district court order currently on appeal concerns costs. Nidek filed an amended bill of costs in the district court seeking an award of $452,441.57 and Summit filed a motion for disallowance requesting that Nidek’s costs be limited to $16,333.98. On June 16, 2004, the district court issued an order stating in its entirety “Plaintiffs Motion for Disallowance of Defendant’s Bill of Costs is granted in part. The defendant is awarded $257,660.13 in costs.” The parties filed a joint motion in the district court requesting that the court specify the components of the cost award. The district court denied the motion.

Summit argues that meaningful review of the district court’s order cannot occur in light of the lack of specificity or explanation concerning which costs were allowed or disallowed and why. Thus, Summit argues, the court should vacate the order and remand for a specification of findings. In response, Nidek contends that under First Circuit law a district court is not required to give reasons for the reduction of a requested award of costs in every instance.

The First Circuit has stated that “if the basis for denying costs is readily apparent on the face of the record, a trial court need not explain its action merely for explanation’s sake. If, however, the situation is less than obvious, the court must offer some statement as to why it denied statutory costs to a prevailing party.” *In re San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire Litigation,*994 F.2d 956, 963 (1st Cir.1993) (footnote omitted). *See also Head v. Medford,*62 F.3d 351, 354 (11th Cir.1995) (determining that district court abused its discretion when it failed to give reasons for its denial of costs); *Weihaupt v. American Med. Assoc.,*874 F.2d 419, 430-31 (7th Cir.1989) (vacating and remanding to district court for further proceedings because district court failed to make findings concerning costs). Summit argues that the reasons for the district court’s action are not readily apparent, and in light of the standard set forth in *San Juan Dupont Plaza,*it is appropriate to vacate and remand.

*108We agree with Summit that it is appropriate to vacate and remand to the district court for further proceedings.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Summit’s motion to vacate and remand is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Exhibit 10.1 3Q NSE Form 10-Q






CEO COMPENSATION 



On September 22, 2005, the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. (the
“Company”) met and approved certain changes to the compensation of M. Truman
Hunt, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, as reflected in Mr. Hunt’s
Employment Letter and the Company’s 2005 Executive Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”) based on its review of the Company’s performance and Mr.
Hunt’s current compensation levels. The Committee engaged an independent compensation
consultant to assist it in its review of Mr. Hunt’s compensation package. Effective
October 1, 2005, Mr. Hunt’s salary was increased to $665,000 and the Bonus
Percentage Level under the Plan for Mr. Hunt was increased from 80% to 100% of his
base salary. Under the terms of the Plan, the Bonus Percentage Level represents the amount
of the bonus if targeted performance levels are achieved. The amount of bonus payable to
Mr. Hunt under the Plan may be more than this level to the extent performance exceeds the
targeted performance level. The Committee also revised the number of options to be
received by Mr. Hunt on an annual basis to 200,000.
*Watts, Griffis and McOuat*

Consulting Geologists and Engineers 

June 25, 2007 

**CONSENT**

 

| TO:        |   | Northwestern Mineral Ventures Inc.        |
|------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|       |   |                                      |
| AND TO:    |   | Berns & Berns, Counselors at Law      |
|       |   |                                      |
| AND TO:    |   | U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission |
|       |   | (the “Securities Regulator”)    |
|       |   |                                      |
| Gentlemen: |   |                                      |

**Re: A Technical Review of the Picachos Silver-Gold and Base Metals Prospects,**

**Western Durango State, Mexico**

Reference  is made to the technical report (the “Technical Report”) dated 24  November, 2004 entitled “*A Technical Review of the Picachos Silver-Gold  and Base Metals Prospects, Western Durango State, Mexico for Nothwestern Mineral  Ventures Inc*.” which we prepared for **Northwestern  Mineral Ventures Inc**. (the “Corporation”).

We hereby consent to the filing of the Technical Report with the Securities Regulator, and to the written disclosure of the Technical Report and the inclusion of extracts therefrom or a summary thereof in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 (“Form 20-F”). We reserve the right to review such disclosures to ensure that our comments are contextually accurate. 

We further agree to being named as an expert in the Form 20-F. 

Dated this 25 day of June, 2007. 

 

|   |   |                                           | Sincerely,                            |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|   |   | **WATTS,          GRIFFIS AND McOUAT LIMITED** |
|        |   |                                           |                                       |
| JH/ls  |   | Per:                                           | Joe          Hinzer, P.Geo. President |

WATTS,  GRIFFIS AND McOUAT LIMITED     Suite  400 • 8 King Street East • Toronto • Canada • M5C 1B5 •  Tel: (416) 364-6244 • Fax: (416) 864-1675 • Email: wgm@wgm.on.ca •  Web: www.wgm.on.ca 

 

 

----
Affiliate Members

February 2024

    

AFFILIATES

Mark Dolfi

Carolyn Dutot

Daniel Ferguson

Edward German

Neal Gieselman

Bethany Growns

Jane Harris

Roberta Hatcher

Michael King

Steven Lee

Netta Lev Tov Chattah

Udo Mahlmeister

Michael Matheson

Campbell McGhee

Allison Miller

Reuben Moreton

Johanna Morley

Patricia Moss

Emily Mullins

Truc Phan

Ruth Philips

Kaitlyn Polinski

Jason Prince

Arnout Ruifrok

Chimnay Sahu

Ryan Soule

John Splain

Michael Streed

Frederick Sykes

Antonio Trindade

Geoff Whitaker

Steven Wilkins

Caroline Wilkinson

Autumn Wilmot
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 67196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26849]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Finance, Budget & Program Committee Meeting 
of the Board of Directors

TIME & DATE: 12:00 p.m., Monday, November 17, 2014

PLACE: NeighborWorks America--Gramlich Boardroom, 999 North Capitol 
Street NE., Washington DC 20002

STATUS: Open (with the exception of Executive Session)

CONTACT PERSON: Jeffrey Bryson, General Counsel/Secretary, (202) 760-
4101; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#69030b1b101a060729071e47061b0e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c8a2aabab1bba7a688a6bfe6a7baaf">[email protected]</span></a>.

AGENDA: 
I. Call to Order
II. Executive Session: Transition Update
III. Executive Session: Bank of America Settlement Update
IV. Success Measures Data Systems Approval
V. Sustainable Homeownership Procurement
VI. Organizational Underwriting & Grants to Network
VII. New Strategic Plan
VIII. Financial Report
IX. Management Updates
X. Adjournment

Jeffrey T. Bryson,
EVP & General Counsel/Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-26849 Filed 11-7-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7570-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1

 

Mechanical Technology Incorporated

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Mechanical Technology Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dale W. Church, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), that, to my knowledge:
10352.

#### Anthony *v.*The State.

Decided March 7, 1919.

Accusation of manufacture of intoxicating liquor; from city court of Macon—Judge Guerry, January 28, 1919.

*Hunter & Wimberly,*for plaintiff in error.

*Will Qunn, solicitor,*contra.

Stephens, J.

The verdict being authorized by the evidence and approved by the trial judge, the judgment overuling the motion for a new trial is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed¡*

*Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
#### STATE v. MITCHELL

No. 156P97

Case below: 125 N.C.App. 617

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 June 1997.
EXHIBIT 15.1

November 12, 1998

ESG Re Limited
#16 Church Street
Hamilton, Bermuda

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of ESG Re Limited and subsidiaries for the periods ended September
30, 1998 and 1997, as indicated in our report dated November 12, 1998; because
we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1998, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement #333-40341 on Form F-1.

We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


Deloitte & Touche
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF


PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)






| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K of Odimo
    Incorporated for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005,
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                                                                         
|
| | (2) the information contained in such Annual Report on
    Form 10-K of Odimo Incorporated for the fiscal year ended
    December 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
    Odimo Incorporated at the dates and for the periods indicated.







| |                              
| | -----------------------------
| | /s/ Amerisa Kornblum         
| |                              
| | Amerisa Kornblum             
| | Chief Financial Officer      
| | (Principal Financial Officer)
ILND 450 (Rev. 04/29/2016) Judgment in a Civil Action

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Plaintiff(s), 

v. 

Defendant(s). 

Case No.

Judge 

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Judgment is hereby entered (check appropriate box):

in favor of plaintiff(s) 

and against defendant(s)

in the amount of $ 

which includes pre–judgment interest. 

 does not include pre–judgment interest.

Post-judgment interest accrues on that amount at the rate provided by law from the date of this judgment. 

Plaintiff(s) shall recover costs from defendant(s).

in favor of defendant(s) 

and against plaintiff(s) 

Defendant(s) shall recover costs from plaintiff(s).

other: 

This action was (check one): 

tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. 

tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision was reached. 

decided by Judge on a motion 

Date: Thomas G. Bruton, Clerk of Court

 , Deputy Clerk 

Case: 1:20-cv-04915 Document #: 15 Filed: 01/12/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:141
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6335

CHEVY RAMAT SHIVAEE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

E. M. CUBE, M.D.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-98-780-7)

Submitted: July 20, 2000 Decided: August 1, 2000

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chevy Ramat Shivaee, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Duane Vieth, WOOTEN

& HART, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Chevy Ramat Shivaee appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting

the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny Shivaee’s motion for appointment of counsel

and we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Shivaee

v. Cube, No. CA-98-780-7 (W.D. Va. Feb. 24, 2000). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of American Power Conversion Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 25, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard J.Thompson, Senior Vice President, Finance, and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| /s/ Richard J. Thompson                                      |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Richard J. Thompson                                          |   |   |
| Senior Vice President, Finance, and Chief Financial  Officer |   |   |

 

August 4, 2006

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separatedisclosure document.

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

January 18, 2013

t0116

Order 

January 18, 2013

146011-2

HOME-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146011-2

COA: 301105, 301775 

Arenac CC: 10-011286-CK

VIRGIE DOWNS, Individually and as Next

Friend of Jacquelyn Downs,

Defendant-Appellant, 

and

GARY STEIN, KIMBERLY HALEY-STEIN,

and JADE STEIN,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 10, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

HATHAWAY, J., not participating.
Exhibit 31.4

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (Amendment No. 1)**

 

I, C. Harril Whitehurst, Jr., certify that:

 
| 1. | I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Village Bank and Trust Financial Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2007; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| Date:  May 22, 2008 | By: /s/ C. Harril Whitehurst, Jr. |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                | C. Harril Whitehurst, Jr.         |  
 

Senior Vice President and

 
 

Chief Financial Officer

 
 

 

 

 

  |