alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3957

To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to extend trade adjustment assistance 

to certain service workers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2004

Mr. KING of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to extend trade adjustment 

assistance to certain service workers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSIST4 ANCE TO SERVICES SECTOR. 

5 (a) ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE FOR WORKERS.—Sec6 tion 221(a)(1)(A) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 

7 2271(a)(1)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘firm)’’ and insert8 ing ‘‘firm, and workers in a service sector firm or subdivi9 sion of a service sector firm’’. 
2

•HR 3957 IH 

1 (b) GROUP ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS.—Section 

2 222 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2272) is amend3 ed—

4 (1) in subsection (a)—

5 (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), 

6 by striking ‘‘agricultural firm)’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘agricultural firm, and workers in a service sec8 tor firm or subdivision of a service sector 

9 firm)’’; 

10 (B) in paragraph (2)—

11 (i) in subparagraph (A)(ii), by strik12 ing ‘‘like or directly competitive with arti13 cles produced’’ and inserting ‘‘or services 

14 like or directly competitive with articles 

15 produced or services provided’’; and 

16 (ii) by inserting after subparagraph 

17 (B) the following: 

18 ‘‘(C)(i) there has been a shift, by such 

19 workers’ firm or subdivision to a foreign coun20 try, in provision of services like or directly com21 petitive with services which are provided by 

22 such firm or subdivision; or 

23 ‘‘(ii) such workers’ firm or subdivision has 

24 obtained or is likely to obtain services described 

25 in clause (i) from a foreign country’’; 
3

•HR 3957 IH 

1 (2) in subsection (b), in the matter preceding 

2 paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘agricultural firm)’’ and 

3 inserting ‘‘agricultural firm, and workers in a service 

4 sector firm or subdivision of a service sector firm)’’; 

5 and 

6 (3) in subsection (c)(3)—

7 (A) by inserting ‘‘(or subdivision)’’ after 

8 ‘‘such other firm’’; and 

9 (B) by striking ‘‘, if the certification’’ and 

10 all that follows through ‘‘Mexico’’. 

11 (c) DEFINITIONS.—Section 247 of the Trade Act of 

12 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2319) is amended by inserting after 

13 paragraph (6) the following: 

14 ‘‘(7) The term ‘service sector firm’ means an 

15 entity engaged in the business of providing informa16 tion technology or other high technology services.’’.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of American Power Conversion Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending June 25, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rodger B. Dowdell,Jr., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| /s/ Rodger B. Dowdell, Jr.                      |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Rodger B. Dowdell, Jr.                          |   |   |
| Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |

 

August 4, 2006

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separatedisclosure document.

----
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/              Donna Goral                                                 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Donna                GoralChairman                of the Board and President |

----
9606.

#### Peavy *v.*The Cosmopolitan Life Insurance Co.

Decided November 12, 1918.

Complaint; from Ben Hill superior court—Judge Crum. February 9, 1918.

*Eldridge Cutts, J. W. Haygood,*for plaintiff in error.

*Otis H. Elkins, Little, Powell, Smith &*Goldstein, contra.

Wade, C. J.

1. There is no substantial merit in any of the various 'special grounds of motion for a new trial.

2. In all essential particulars the instant case is controlled by the fully considered decision of this court in the case of *Cosmopolitan Life Ins. , Co.*v. *Sheats,*20 *Ga. App.*622 (93 S. E. 507).

3. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.*
**Exhibit
      15.1**




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
      have
      issued our report dated June 30, 2008 accompanying the consolidated
      financial statements included in the Annual Report of Vuance Ltd. on
      Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007. We hereby consent to
      the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements
      of
      Vuance Ltd. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-121231, effective
      December 14, 2004).






Fahn
      Kanne & Co.


Certified
      Public Accountants (Isr.)






Tel-Aviv,
      Israel


June
      30,
      2008
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Mercari Communications Group, Ltd. on Form
10-QSB/A for the  period ending August 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the  Report), I, Robert W. Marsik,
Chief Executive/Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my  knowledge and belief:

|(1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: June
17, 2004 |  | By:/s/  Robert W. Marsik
      Robert W. Marsik, Chief Executive Officer
      Chief Financial Officer
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating,  acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of  this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-144846) pertaining to the Polypore International, Inc. 2006
Stock Option Plan and the Polypore International, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated March 10, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Polypore International, Inc, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K), for the year ended December 29, 2007.

| |  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
| |  | ---------------------

Charlotte,
North Carolina
March 10, 2008

---



QuickLinks
BIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE

disposition process

Te c h n i c a l Wo r k i n g G r o u p o n B i o l o g i c a l E v i d e n c e P r e s e r v a t i o n

For additional guidance on biological evidence disposition, please reference

The Biological Evidence Preservation Handbook: Best Practices for Evidence Handlers

( http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publication-search.cfm?pub_id=913699 ).

Get Final

Sign Off Final Disposition of Evidence

Yearly inventory 

identifies evidence 

due for destruction

Notification of 

destruction sent 

per statutory 

requirements

In-house “tickler” 

system tracks 

evidence and 

identifies upcoming 

disposition time

Contact relevant 

parties to confirm 

case status

Prepare necessary 

paperwork to 

request status 

of case from 

investigator

If item is of value, 

determine if 

the item will be 

returned to owner 

or diverted for 

department use

Obtain written 

approval to return, 

release, or destroy 

the item

Notify owner on 

record

Locate item on 

shelf

Obtain government 

identification and 

signature from 

owner

Notify management 

of upcoming 

destruction

Locate item on 

shelf

Identify and obtain 

signatures from 

parties to destroy 

evidence (contractor 

or in-house)

Obtain approvals for 

auction, diversion, or 

perm. transfer per 

departmental policy

Locate item on 

shelf

Obtain signature 

from final user

Release to 

requesting party

Update manual or 

electronic records

Return item to 

owner

Update manual or 

electronic records

Conduct destruction 

with witness and per 

relevant biological 

disposal laws

Update manual or 

electronic records

UPDATE TAKE ACTION LOCATE NOTIFY

Return to Owner Destroy

Release for

Auction/Diversion/

Permanent Transfer

National Institute of

Standards and Technology

U.S. Department of Commerce

National Institute of

Standards and Technology

U.S. Department of Commerce

Confirm

Case Status

Identify Evidence 

Due for Disposition
Still Face Challenge Problem 

Multiple Biometric Multiple Biometric Grand Challe

Challe

Preliminary Results of Version 

05 D
Still Face Background • FRVT 2006

– Verification rate = .99 at 

FAR =0.001

– Frontal– Controlled illumination– High resolution (400 pixels between the ey– Large scale laboratory collection
MBGC Still Face Goals 

• Many applications of still face involve

– Unconstrained illumination Unconstrained illumination

– Low resolution (90-120 pixels between th– Compressed imagery (8KB to 20KB)– Non-frontal
MBGC Still Face Goals

• Many applications of still face involve

– Unconstrained illumination Unconstrained illumination

– Low resolution– Compressed imagery– Non-frontal

MBGC Still Face challenge proble

addresses these constraints constraints .
Still Face 

• Two target sets – AY03-04 (FRGC)

– Controlled illumination frontal– Uncontrolled illumination frontal

• One query One query set – AY04 -05 

– Uncontrolled illumination frontal– Uncontrolled illumination non-frontal
Effects of Lower Resolution and 

Compression on FR• Determine Determine effect of

– Lower resolution– Compression

• Process orig inal imag es to meet data

requirements

– Scale and crop

• 120 and 90 pixels between the eyes

– Compress images

• 20KB and 8KB
een eye

Still Face Processing 

Compress jpe

Scale / Crop

ISO SC-3

Original Image

120 Pixels 

between the eyes 

20k 

120 Pixels 

between eye

Face Still 

90 Pixels 

betw 

90 Pixels 

between the eyes 

between eye

8k 
Results from Still Face Challenge 

Problem Version 1... 
Participants 

• Dalian University University of Technology 

• L-1 Identity Solutions AG 

• Pittsburg h Pattern Recog nition • Cogent Inc. • Toshiba Corporation 
Contro

16,02

Uncontrolled 

Number of Still I

3,097 

Uncontrolle

Frontal vs. Non-fron

Controlled 

Number of Stills 

16,028 

Uncontrolled 

Number of Stills 

8,014 
Frontal vs. Non-Frontal ROC 

Results from an Open Book Challenge Problem, NOT an Independent Evaluat
Contro

16,02

Controlled vs. Uncontro

Number of Images 

16,028 

Numbe

1

No Compression

C iompression 

120 pixels 

20 KB 

Compression 

90 pixels 

8 KB 
Controlled vs. Uncontrolled Front

Results from an Open Book Challenge Problem, NOT an Independent Evaluat
Uncontrolled vs. Uncontrol

Number of Images 

8,014 

Number of 

10,68

No Compression 

Compression 

90pi xel s 

8 KB 

Compression Compression 

120 pixels 

20 KB 
Uncontrolled vs. Uncontrolle

Frontal ROC 

Results from an Open Book Challenge Problem, NOT an Independent Evaluat
Summary Frontal 

Results from an Open Book Challenge Problem, NOT an Independent Eva
Conclusion 

• Cross pose matching atching is very difficult difficult.

• Performance on Performance on controlled controlled images is images is e

than on uncontrolled.

• More studies are needed to characteriz

algorithm algorithm s ’response to response to resolution and resolution andcompression.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                      85,714
<SECURITIES>                                                30,221
<RECEIVABLES>                                               11,961
<ALLOWANCES>                                                1,131
<INVENTORY>                                                 1,805
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            136,442
<PP&E>                                                      19,391
<DEPRECIATION>                                              2,998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              157,293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       44,330
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                    294,079
<OTHER-SE>                                                  (183,990)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                157,293
<SALES>                                                     121,438
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            121,438
<CGS>                                                       111,021
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               205,275
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            13,980
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          13,980
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (97,817)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         (97,817)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                                (97,817)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 (3.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               (3.52)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of LG Display Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: April 29, 2016



/s/ SANG BEOM HANSang Beom HanRepresentative Director, President andChief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 has been provided to LG Display Co., Ltd. and will be retained by LG Display Co., Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

| August 9, 2007 | By:    | /s/                              Harry N. Stout |   |
|----------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| (Date)

  |   | Harry N. Stout

President

                                                                                                                                                            |   |

 

 

 

 

 

----
Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
------------------------------------------------

I, Tom E. Jebsen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Ship Finance International
Limited;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
          disclosure   controls  and   procedures  to  be  designed   under  our
          supervision,  to ensure  that  material  information  relating  to the
          registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities,  particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
          control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during the period
          covered by the  annual  report  that has  materially  affected,  or is
          reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the  registrant's  internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   all significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation  of internal  control  over  financial  reporting  which are
          reasonably  likely to  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: June 30, 2005

/s/ Tom Jebsen
--------------------------
Tom E. Jebsen
Chief Financial Officer