alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 697-13 Filed: 02/09/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:17920
5/5/2022 邮件 - ye fangjin - Outlook

https://outlook.live.com/mail/0/inbox/id/AQQkADAwATNiZmYAZC0zNmIxLTUxYTctMDACLTAwCgAQAJp8tKlPAUganpBic3FGWCI%3D 1/2

Notice of Preliminary Injunction in 1:20-cv-4806

Chaisa Wilson <cwilson@loeb.com>

周四 2022/1/13 5:22

收件人: 'yjmykjus@outlook.com' <yjmykjus@outlook.com>

抄送: Arthur Yuan <ayuan@loeb.com>

8 个附件(9 MB)

Third Amended Complaint.pdf; TAC - Exhibit 3.pdf; TAC - Exhibit 4.pdf; TAC - Exhibit 2.pdf; Amended Schedule

A.pdf; Nov 2020 PI Order (Dkt 113).pdf; Dec 2020 PI Order (Dkt 147).pdf; Operative Oct 2021 PI Order (Dkt

456).pdf;

To Whom It May Concern:

We represent Plainffs in the above-referenced acon. You are enjoined by Preliminary Injuncon dated

October 13, 2021 for selling one of the enjoined products and as being working in concert or parcipaon

with other defendants who are already enjoined by the Preliminary Injuncon. Aached you will find the

operave Amended Complaint (and exhibits), operave Preliminary Injuncons, and Amended Schedule A.

【【以下中文声明仅是友善提示】】

[[The following Chinese noce is for courtesy purposes only]]

你好:

本事务所代表本诉讼的原告。你之所以收到此律师函和附件的文件,包括禁令,是因为你曾销售过或

正销售禁令中的产品。我们建议你严肃面对此问题,去聘请美国律师来和我们接洽。

Our firm represents the plainffs in this acon. You are receiving this noce and the aached documents,

which include the injuncon order, because you are selling or have sold an enjoined product. We recommend

that you take this maer seriously and hire a US licensed lawyer to contact us.

Sincerely,

Chaisa Wilson

Chaisa Wilson

Paralegal

321 North Clark Street, Suite 2300 | Chicago, IL 60654

Direct Dial: 312.464.3356 | Fax: 312.464.3111 | E-mail: cwilson@loeb.com

Los Angeles | New York | Chicago | Nashville | Washington, DC | San Francisco | Beijing | Hong Kong | www.loeb.com

Chaisa Wilson

Paralegal

321 North Clark Street, Suite 2300 | Chicago, IL 60654

Direct Dial: 312.464.3356 | Fax: 312.464.3111 | E-mail: cwilson@loeb.com

Los Angeles | New York | Chicago | Nashville | Washington, DC | San Francisco | Beijing | Hong Kong | www.loeb.com

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 697-13 Filed: 02/09/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:17921
5/5/2022 邮件 - ye fangjin - Outlook

https://outlook.live.com/mail/0/inbox/id/AQQkADAwATNiZmYAZC0zNmIxLTUxYTctMDACLTAwCgAQAJp8tKlPAUganpBic3FGWCI%3D 2/2

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to

it may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person

responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or

use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have

received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender. Please destroy the original transmission and its

attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you, Loeb & Loeb LLP.

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 697-13 Filed: 02/09/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:17922
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 9, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-50710

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RUBEN TORRES-ROBLES, also known as Luis Alberto Vidal, also known

as Pedro C. Parra, also known as Juan Vasquez Ibarra, also known

as Juan Ibarra, also known as Ruben Torres,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:04-CR-466-ALL

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Ruben TorresRobles raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a

prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
----

----

| Name of Subsidiary     |   | Jurisdiction of Organization |   | Percent Owned |
|------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|---------------|
|                   |   |                         |   |          |
| Vuance Inc.            |   | United States                |   | 100%          |
| Vuance RFID Inc.*      |   | United States                |   | 100%          |
| S.B.C. Aviation Ltd.   |   | Israel                       |   | 100%          |
| SuperCom Slovakia A.S. |   | Slovakia                     |   | 66%           |
| PureRFid Inc.          |   | United States                |   | 100%          |

----

----
H. Res. 549

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 24, 1998.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 3616) to authorize appropriations for fiscal

year 1999 for military activities of the Department of Defense, to prescribe military personnel strengths for fiscal year

1999, and for other purposes. All points of order against the

conference report and against its consideration are waived.

The conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 21.1SUBSIDIARIES OF COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC.       Entity Jurisdiction1. Trim Systems Inc. Delaware     2. Trim Systems Operating Corp. Delaware     3. CVG International Holdings Limited Barbados     4. CVG Vehicle Components (Shanghai) Co. LTD. China     5. CVS Holdings Limited United Kingdom     6. Commercial Vehicle Systems Limited United Kingdom     7. Bostrom Limited United Kingdom     8. Bostrom Investments Limited United Kingdom     9. KAB Seating LLC United Kingdom     10. Bostrom International Limited United Kingdom     11. KAB Seating AB Sweden     12. KAB Seating Pty Australia     13. KAB Seating S.A. Belgium     14. National Seating Company Delaware     15. KAB Seating Limited United Kingdom     16. A. Stokes Pressings Limited United Kingdom     17. Wilton & Co. Pressings Limited United Kingdom
 

 
     18. Bostrom Specialist Engineering Limited United Kingdom     19. Winston Cable Limited United Kingdom     20. JMH Limited United Kingdom     21. KAB Tooling Limited United Kingdom     22. Bostrom Europe United Kingdom     23. The C&P Jig & Tool Limited United Kingdom     24. BB Seating Limited United Kingdom     25. Palmer & Shelley Limited United Kingdom     26. AJW Holdings Limited United Kingdom     27. KAB Industries Limited United Kingdom     28. Corvus Suspension Products Limited United Kingdom     29. KAB Pressings Limited United Kingdom     30. KAB Components Limited United Kingdom     31. AJ Williams Small Pressings Limited United Kingdom     32. Bostrom Vehicle Components Limited United Kingdom     33. Inbark Limited United Kingdom     34. KAB Engineering Limited United Kingdom     35. CVS Holdings Inc. Delaware     36. Sprague Devices Delaware     37. CVG Management Corp Delaware     38. CVG Logistics LLC Delaware
 

 
     39. Mayflower Vehicle Systems LLC Delaware     40. T.S. Mexico S.DE R. L. DE C.V. Mexico     41. Monona Corporation Delaware     42. Monona Wire Corporation Iowa     43. Monona (Mexico) Holdings LLC Illinois     44. MWC de Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V. Mexico     45. EMD Servicios S.A. de C.V. Mexico     46. Cabarrus Plastics Inc. North Carolina     47. CVG European Holdings, LLC Delaware     48. CVG International GP Bermuda     49. C.I.E.B. Kahovec, spol. s.r.o. Czech Republic
Opinion issued February 28, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 9
- 00 062
- C R

——————————— VICTOR EARL KNIGHT , Appellant

V . THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 176 th District C ourt

H a rri s County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 159 4356

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Victor Earl Knight , pleaded guilty to the first

- degree felony offense of aggravated robbery

— deadly weapon, with an agreed punishment
recommendation of elev en years’ confinement

. 1 In accordance with h is plea bargain

1 See T EX
. P ENAL C ODE A NN
. § 2 9.03 ( a)( 2 ) , (b) (West 201 1 ).2

with the State, t he trial court found appellant guilty and assessed h is punishment at
elev en years’ confinement on December 1 9 , 2018

. 2 The trial court certified that th is

w as a plea

- bargain ed case and that appellant h ad no right of appeal. See T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2) . Appellant timely filed a pro se notice of appeal. See T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 26.2(a)(1). We dismiss th is appeal for want of jurisdiction. In a plea

- bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal. T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN
. art. 44.02 (West 20 06 ); T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been m ade part of the record. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d); see Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)

. Here, the trial court’s certification stated t hat this w as a plea

- bargained case and that appellant had no right of appeal, and the trial court did not give its permission to appeal any matters. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d); Dears , 154
S.W.3d at 615. The clerk’s record , filed in this Court including the pl ea waiver,
supp ort s the trial court’s certification. See Dears , 154 S.W.3d at 615

. Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss th i s appeal. See Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having

2 See T EX
. P ENAL C ODE A NN
. § 12.32(a) (West 2011 ).3

jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea

- bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”)

. Accordingly, we dismiss th i s appeal for want of jurisdiction. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 43.2(f). PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and L andau

. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2( b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001049011
<NAME>                        Omni Doors, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                          1
<CURRENCY>                                                   US Dollars
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                              JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                       1
<CASH>                                                           383945
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 383945
<PP&E>                                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   384045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            500000
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                          55767
<OTHER-SE>                                                     (171722)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     384045
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      0
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    115955
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  115955
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              115955
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   (115955)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    (0.01)
        


</TABLE>
# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

MANDATE

TO THE 296TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF COLLIN COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, on the 10 th day of January

, 2018 , the cause on appeal to revise or reverse the judgment between

THOMAS J. GRANATA, II, Appellant

No. 05

- 17

- 00118

- CV V.

MICHAEL KROESE AND JUSTIN HILL, Appellees On Appeal from the 296th Jud icial District Court, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296

- 01005

- 2016. Opinion delivered by Justice Myers. Justices Bridges and Schenck participating.

was determined; and this Court made its order in these words:

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED

.

It is ORDERED that appellees MICHAEL KROESE AND JUSTIN HILL recover their costs of this appeal from appellant THOMAS J. GRANATA, II.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAN D YOU to observe the order of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, in this behalf, and have it duly obeyed and executed.

WITNESS the HON. CAROLYN WRIGHT, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Dallas, this 5th day of June, 2018. 

# 5 L M

LISA MATZ, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,596,995
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,848,207
<PP&E>                                      44,919,402
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,671,237
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,096,372
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          579,132
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,118,269
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,096,372
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,145,705
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,176,865
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,968,840
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,968,840
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,968,840
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
LaSalle

LaSalle
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of MAIR Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  November 14, 2003 | By:                                                    |  /s/  Paul F. Foley  |   |
|---------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                      | Paul F.  Foley                                         |
|                      | President  and Chief Executive Officer                 |
|                      |                                                   |
|                      |                                                   |
| Dated:  November 14, 2003 | By:                                                    |  /s/  Robert E. Weil |   |
|                      | Robert E.  Weil                                        |
|                      | Vice  President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

A signed original of thiscertification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

27

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pliant Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jack E. Knott, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ Jack E. Knott


Jack E. Knott
Chief Executive Officer
August 6, 2002
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 6, 2011 

d0829 

Order 

 

September 6, 2011 

141702(67) 

LOLINDA RANDOLPH, Personal Representative 

of the Estate of BRYAN RANDOLPH, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 141702 

 COA: 285103 

Wayne CC: 05-533887-NH 

HENRY FORD HOSPITAL, HENRY FORD 

SYSTEM, INC., DR. SCOTT E. LANGENBERG, 

and MICHIGAN PEDIATRIC SURGICAL 

ASSOCIATES, P.C., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 23, 

2011 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

 MARILYN KELLY and HATHAWAY, JJ., would grant reconsideration and, on 

reconsideration, would grant leave to appeal. 

 ZAHRA, J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, each of the undersigned officers of Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such
officers knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  September 1, 2005







/s/    Kunio NakamuraName:

Kunio NakamuraTitle:

President and Director(Principal Executive Officer)/s/    Tetsuya KawakamiName:

Tetsuya KawakamiTitle:

Senior Managing Director(Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>
                                             EXHIBIT (24)

                        POWER OF ATTORNEY
                        -----------------
  
   Each of the undersigned directors of The Narragansett Electric Company
  (the "Company"), individually as a director of the Company, hereby
  constitutes and appoints John G. Cochrane, Patricia M. Needham, and Robert
  K. Wulff, individually, as attorney-in-fact to execute on behalf of the
  undersigned the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
  December 31, 1996, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
  and to execute any appropriate amendment or amendments thereto as may be
  required by law.
  Dated this 25th day of March, 1997.
  
  s/Joan T. Bok                      s/Joseph J. Kirby
  _________________________          _________________________
  Joan T. Bok                        Joseph J. Kirby
  
  s/Stephen A. Cardi                 s/Robert L. McCabe
  _________________________          _________________________
  Stephen A. Cardi                   Robert L. McCabe
  
  s/Richard W. Frost                 
  _________________________          _________________________ 
  Richard W. Frost                   John W. Rowe
  
  s/Frances H. Gammell
  _________________________          _________________________ 
  Frances H. Gammell                 Richard P. Sergel
  
                                     s/William E. Trueheart
                                     _________________________
  
                                     William E. Trueheart