alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3997

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to convey to the New Hope Cemetery 

Association a small parcel of National Forest System land in the State 

of Arkansas for use as a cemetery. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 18, 2004

Mr. BOOZMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

MARCH 23, 2004

The Committee on Agriculture discharged 

MARCH 23, 2004

Rereferred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to convey to the New 

Hope Cemetery Association a small parcel of National 

Forest System land in the State of Arkansas for use 

as a cemetery.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3997 RCH 

1 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF SMALL PARCEL OF NATIONAL 

2 FOREST SYSTEM LAND, POPE COUNTY, AR3 KANSAS. 

4 (a) CONVEYANCE ON CONDITION SUBSEQUENT.—

5 Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this 

6 Act, subject to valid existing rights and the condition stat7 ed in subsection (c), the Secretary of Agriculture, acting 

8 through the Chief of the Forest Service (referred to in 

9 this section as the ‘‘Secretary’’), shall convey to the New 

10 Hope Cemetery Association (referred to in this section as 

11 the ‘‘association’’), for no consideration, all right, title, 

12 and interest of the United States in and to the parcel of 

13 land described in subsection (b). 

14 (b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The parcel of land re15 ferred to in subsection (a) is the parcel of National Forest 

16 System land (including any improvements on the land) 

17 that—

18 (1) is known as ‘‘New Hope Cemetery Tract 

19 6686c’’; 

20 (2) consists of approximately 1.1 acres; and 

21 (3) is more particularly described as a portion 

of the SE 1⁄4 of the NW 1 22 ⁄4 of section 30, T. 11, 

23 R. 17W, Pope County, Arkansas. 

24 (c) CONDITION ON USE OF LAND.—

25 (1) IN GENERAL.—The association shall use the 

26 parcel conveyed under subsection (a) as a cemetery. 
3

HR 3997 RCH 

1 (2) REVERSION.—If the Secretary, after notice 

2 to the association and an opportunity for a hearing, 

3 makes a finding that the association has used or 

4 permitted the use of the parcel for any purpose 

5 other than the purpose specified in paragraph (1), 

6 and the association fails to discontinue that use, title 

7 to the parcel shall, at the option of the Secretary, 

8 revert to the United States, to be administered by 

9 the Secretary.

Æ
{"id":11785,"count":45,"description":"","link":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/organizations\/otps\/","name":"Office of Technology, Policy and Strategy (OTPS)","slug":"otps","taxonomy":"category","parent":2667,"meta":{"redirect":"","media-tag":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/11785"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/taxonomies\/category"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/2667"}],"wp:post_type":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts?categories=11785"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/hdsnav?categories=11785"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic?categories=11785"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/gallery?categories=11785"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/reference?categories=11785"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/mission?categories=11785"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/feature?categories=11785"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press-release?categories=11785"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/stem-content?categories=11785"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/people?categories=11785"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/event?categories=11785"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/image-article?categories=11785"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/nasa-blog?categories=11785"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages?categories=11785"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/migration?categories=11785"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/podcast?categories=11785"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the inclusion in this registration statement on Form S-1
of our reports dated March 26, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedules of Capstar
Broadcasting Corporation and Subsidiaries. We also consent to the references
to our firm under the captions "Experts" and "Selected Financial Data".




                                        COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Austin, Texas
March 27, 1998
Exhibit 13.12

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Inmarsat Leasing (Two) Limited (the "Company") for the annual period ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Periodic Report"), I, Rick Medlock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  | /s/RICK MEDLOCKRick Medlock Chief Financial Officer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------

Date:
April 29, 2005

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          72,209
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           8,999
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                91,202
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    142,868
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         143,127
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           143,131
<LOANS>                                      1,156,869
<ALLOWANCE>                                     14,374
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,510,890
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,168,582
<SHORT-TERM>                                   110,955
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             62,843
<LONG-TERM>                                     28,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,446
<COMMON>                                        26,102
<OTHER-SE>                                     111,212
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,510,890
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 25,961
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,052
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,026
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                29,039
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,010
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,621
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           15,418
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      405
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  27
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 16,181
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,991
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,991
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,776
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.65
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,939
<LOANS-PAST>                                        10
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                14,080
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      302
<RECOVERIES>                                       191
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               14,374
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
DHS/NIST Workshop – BioFire Defense Overview

15 June 2021
2

FilmArray - Simple, Easy, Fast

Information Proprietary to BioFire Defense - Confidential

-Automated

-Integrated Sample Preparation

-Multiple Genetic Targets

-Automatic Analysis

-45 Minutes

-Clinical and Environmental 

- >10,000 Systems in US Clinical Use
3

BioFire Syndromic Approach

Traditional Testing Syndromic Testing

Syndromic testing is a symptom-driven grouping of pathogens into a 

rapid test that maximizes the chance of getting the right answer to a 

doctor

Confidential Proprietary - BioFire Defense
4

FilmArray® Panels – BioFire Defense

Confidential Proprietary – BioFire Defense

Warrior Panel

US DoD Only

2017

Global Fever Panel 

2020

Food & Water Panel

Environmental 

2019

Mycoplasma Panel 

Environmental

2020

Sentinel Panel

US DoD Only

Environmental 

2018

BioThreat Panel

Environmental

2010

COVID 19-Test 

FDA EUA 

2020

BioThreat-E

FDA EUA 

2015
5

BioFire Diagnostics FilmArray® Panels 

Confidential Proprietary – BioFire Defense

RP Panel

FDA-cleared 2011

RP2.1 Panel

FDA-cleared 2021

Includes SARSCoV-2

BCID Panel

FDA-cleared 

2013

GI Panel

FDA-cleared 

2014

Pneumo Panel 

FDA-cleared 

2018

ME Panel

FDA-granted 

2015
6

Data Tracking - TRENDS

Internal BioFire Diagnostics Trend Monitoring Team, Data on File

Information Proprietary to BioFire Defense - Confidential

https://www.syndromictrends.com
7

COVID-19 Response

• Developed EUA Test for US DoD

• 7 Different Gene Target (3 Currently Used)

• Sample Types –

• Upper and Lower Respiratory

• Saliva In Development

• Transport Media – Validated Multiple Types

• 510k Clearance Package Submitted

• 300 genomic copies/ml Sensitivity in Wastewater

• Same Sensitivity as Clinical Upper Respiratory Samples

• Shipped Hundreds of Systems to US Gov. in Response to Pandemic

• Increased Production Capacity 300%

• Delivered >1M Tests to US Government

Confidential Proprietary - BioFire Defense 14 June 2021
8

Questions

Matt Scullion

VP Sales and Marketing

BioFire Defense

matt.scullion@biofiredefense.com

Confidential Proprietary - BioFire Defense 14 June 2021
EXHIBIT 4 

FILED UNDER SEAL

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 19-4 Filed: 08/18/20 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1525
Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 19-4 Filed: 08/18/20 Page 2 of 10 PageID #:1526
Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 19-4 Filed: 08/18/20 Page 3 of 10 PageID #:1527
Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 19-4 Filed: 08/18/20 Page 4 of 10 PageID #:1528
Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 19-4 Filed: 08/18/20 Page 5 of 10 PageID #:1529
Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 19-4 Filed: 08/18/20 Page 6 of 10 PageID #:1530
Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 19-4 Filed: 08/18/20 Page 7 of 10 PageID #:1531
Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 19-4 Filed: 08/18/20 Page 8 of 10 PageID #:1532
Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 19-4 Filed: 08/18/20 Page 9 of 10 PageID #:1533
Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 19-4 Filed: 08/18/20 Page 10 of 10 PageID #:1534
** **

**EXHIBIT 32.02**

**SECTION135O CERTIFICATIONS**

**Inconnection with this quarterly report of BlackRock Futures Investments L.P.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”),I, Michael L. Pungello, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that**

1. ThisReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.               The informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 14,2006

----

| By /s/ MICHAEL L. PUNGELLO                   |   |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael L. Pungello                          |
| Chief Financial Officer                      |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          12,846
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  124,705
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,164)
<INVENTORY>                                     20,336
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               165,306
<PP&E>                                         610,491
<DEPRECIATION>                               (248,650)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,154,022
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,668
<BONDS>                                        557,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,864
<OTHER-SE>                                     324,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,154,022
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               735,343
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  539,333
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                59,447
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,888
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,987
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                111,014
<INCOME-TAX>                                    44,438
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             66,576
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    66,576
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1,71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.68
        

</TABLE>
TO VOTE: Use the No. 2 Pencil to connect the broken arrow pointing to your choice, like this:

Sample Ballot

Ward 5

OFFICIAL BALLOT
GENERAL ELECTION

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
NOVEMBER 2, 2004

¢g>

6 EB

+6

For each office, vote only for the number of candidates indicated (DO NOT USE RED INK)

ELECTORS OF
PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT
OF THE UNITED STATES

VOTE FOR NO MORE THAN ONE (1)

JOHN F. KERRY
JOHN EDWARDS

DAVID COBB
PATRICIA LaMARCHE

MICHAEL BADNARIK
RICHARD CAMPAGNA

JAMES HARRIS
MARGARET TROWE

GEORGE W. BUSH
DICK CHENEY

RALPH NADER
PETER MIGUEL CAMEJO

CEWOCRATIC Gams

OC STATEHOOD
GREEN PARTY

DBERTARU Game

SOCIALIST WORKERS PARTY Gam

RECUBLICANG am

WROEPENDERT Gomme

=

Vinite in, # any

DELEGATE TO THE
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

VOTE FOR NO MORE THAN ONE (1)

ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON SENCCRATS mmm

MICHAEL ANDREW MONROE REPCRLCAN Gommt

Write in, if any Gms
AT-LARGE

MEMBER OF THE COUNCIL

VOTE FOR NO MORE THAN TWO @)

CAROL SCHWARTZ REPLaLCAM Gommy
LAURENT ROSS ° Gace eants Qamm
KWAME R. BROWN ery
A.D. “TONY” DOMINGUEZ MOEPENCENT Gem
Write in, if any =
Write in if any ean

TO VOTE: Use the No. 2 Pencil to
connect the broken arrow pointing
te your choice, like this:

g>

Diet

OFFICIAL BALLOT
GENERAL ELECTION

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
NOVEMBER 2, 2004

TO VOTE: Use the No. 2 Pencil to
connect the broken arrow pointing
to your choice, like this

¢>

fom

For each office, vote only for the
number of candidates indicated.

(DO NOT USE RED INK)

TO VOTE: Use the No. 2 Pencil to
connect the broken arrow pointing
to your choice, like this:

g>

Fecal

For each office, vote only for the
number of candidates indicated.

(DO NOT USE RED INK)

UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE
VOTE FOR NO MORE THAN ONE (1)
RAY BROWNE

ADAM EIDINGER

cEMocRan? Quam
5 pn ens oma

Wrice in. if any Son

ADVISORY NEIGHBORHOOD

COMMISSIONER XXXX
WOTE FOR NO MORE THAN ONE (7)

Winte in, € any om

(Gee = anes Sn nS A a SS er Sea
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: DOUGLAS G. KUNKLE,

CONSTABLE 11TH WARD CITY OF

ALLENTOWN,

Petitioner

v.

GEOFF MOULTON, PA. COURT

ADMINISTRATOR,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 49 MM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22 nd day of August , 2022, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-72602, 33-72600, 33-72598 and 33-90722) of
Aviall, Inc. and its subsidiaries of our report dated January 28, 1998
appearing on page F-2 of this Form 10-K.



/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
--------------------------------
Price Waterhouse LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 23, 1998
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-8083

In Re: DOROTHY P. LITZENBERG, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (MISC-94-67) Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 18, 1996 Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dorothy P. Litzenberg, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Dorothy Litzenberg filed this petition for writ of mandamus,continuing in her efforts to have a federal district court interfere in state-court administrative matters and criminal prosecutions. The district court is without authority to do either. Davis v. Lansing , 851 F.2d 72, 74 (2d Cir. 1988) (lower federal courts cannot compel action by state officials); Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg County , 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969); cf. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman , 460 U.S. 462 (1983) (lower federal courts cannot review state court judgments); United States v. Nixon , 418 U.S. 683, 693 (1974) (federal courts cannot compel prosecution except in narrowest circumstances). Therefore, this court cannot order such actions. Therefore, we deny Litzenberg in forma pauperis status and dismiss the petition. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
February 2004

Non-consumer Packages in the Consumer Marketplace 

By Kathy Dresser 

More and more, packages that the manufacturer or packer never intended for retail sale 

are finding their way into the consumer marketplace. With membership clubs and 

wholesale retailers springing up in every city, products that were neither packaged nor 

labeled for re-sale are being pulled into the retail consumer market. 

The NIST Laws and Metric Group has been receiving a growing number of questions 

from manufacturers and weights and measures officials about how these products should 

be labeled and to what standards they should be held. Most callers question whether or 

not packages should be held to consumer package standards if they are labeled with “for 

institutional use” or other similar language. NIST recommends the following: If a 

package is being offered for sale in a retail store, it must meet all of the Handbook 130 

consumer package requirements, including packaging and labeling, method of sale, etc. 

If a product manufacturer or packer labels the product and the package does not 

otherwise meet the requirements for consumer packages, then that product should not be 

offered for sale at the retail level. 

However, weights and measures officials who are contemplating enforcement action on 

these products must give careful consideration to identify the party responsible for the 

error. It may not be the manufacturer or packer who is at fault, but the retailer. If the 

product is packaged for the non-consumer market and clearly labeled with language like 

“for institutional use,” arguably the intent of the manufacturer or packer was that this 

product be sold somewhere other than in the retail marketplace. The manufacturer or 

packer has done what it could to make that intent clear. Once the product enters the 

distribution system, however, the manufacturer or packer may not have any further 

control over the final destination of the product. In some circumstances it may be the 

decision of the retailer to sell this product in the consumer marketplace that violates 

Handbook 130 regulations, not the decision of the manufacturer or packer to package and 

label the product for non-consumer use. 

If you have questions or would like additional assistance with packaging and labeling 

requirements, contact Kathy Dresser at 301-975-3289 or by email at 

kathryn.dresser@nist.gov.
#### Isaac Rainey *v.*Henry Martin.

Bills and Notes — Construction.

Where the court construes a note most favorably to the maker the latter ought not to complain.

AKPEAXi FROM HARRISON CIRCUIT COURT.

January 23, 1873.

■Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The circuit judge decided that the note sued on bore interest from the 31st day of January, 1868. The obligor must have meant something by agreeing to pay it on that day. It is true that it is afterwards recited that the note for the land is made. The only effect that can be given to the stipulation that he would pay on the day named is that interest should begin to run from that date, although the right to coerce payment should not accrue until the deed should be made.

*386*Cleary &*West> *for appellant.*

*Trimble, for appellee.*

The court below construed appellant’s own undertaking most favorably to him, hence he ought not to complain. He did not obj ect to the suits having been prematurely instituted, but answered the amended petition.

Judgment *affirmed.*