alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel, are you 

a 

 Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this Court’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 U.S.C.§1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on 

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

Case: 1:20-cv-04683 Document #: 19 Filed: 12/03/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:98
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3939 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 3939

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 12, 2004

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 14-24 Abbott Road in Fair Lawn, New Jersey, as the ``Mary Ann 
                    Collura Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 14-24 
Abbott Road in Fair Lawn, New Jersey, and known as the Fair Lawn Main 
Post Office, shall be known and designated as the ``Mary Ann Collura 
Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mary Ann Collura Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 11, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 31


I, To-Hon Lam,  chief  executive  officer and  principal  accounting  officer of
Perfisans Holdings, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Perfisans  Holdings,
Inc. (the "registrant");

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e)  and  15d-15(e) for the
registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions  about the  effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this quarterly  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially  affected,  or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial  reporting,  to the  registrant's  auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:  May 19, 2005


/s/ To-Hon Lam
------------------------------
To-Hon Lam
Chief Executive Officer
Principal Accounting Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1861

T. P. CRIGLER; NAJIEH R. CRIGLER,

Petitioners - Appellants,

versus

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 99-9233)

Submitted: December 19, 2003 Decided: January 14, 2004

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

T. P. Crigler and Najieh R. Crigler, Appellants Pro Se. Steven

Wesley Parks, Jonathan Samuel Cohen, John A. Nolet, UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

T. P. Crigler and Najieh R. Crigler appeal from the tax

court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s determination of a

deficiency in their income taxes for the 1995 tax year and imposing

an accuracy-related penalty. We have reviewed the record and the

tax court’s memorandum and opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court.

See Crigler v. Comm’r, IRS, No. 99-9233 (U.S. Tax Ct. May 13,

2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, the undersigned officer of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company(the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| November 5, 2010                | By: /s/ | Michael S. Smith                        |
|--------------------------------------|--------------|-----------------------------------------|
|      (Date) |         | Michael S. Smith    President |

 

----
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Each of the
undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Petro, Inc. (the
Company), that to his knowledge:



(1) The Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



This written statement is being furnished to the SEC as an exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this statement has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                       |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: October 21, 2005 |  | /s/ J.A. Cardwell, Sr.               
|                       |  | (J.A. Cardwell, Sr.)                 
|                       |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                       | 
|Date: October 21, 2005 |  | /s/ James A. Cardwell, Jr.           
|                       |  | (James A. Cardwell, Jr.)             
|                       |  | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3924 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3924

 To authorize an annual appropriation of $10,000,000 for mental health 
                    courts through fiscal year 2009.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2004

Mr. Strickland introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize an annual appropriation of $10,000,000 for mental health 
                    courts through fiscal year 2009.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 1001(a)(20) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and 
Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3793(a)(20)) is amended by striking 
``fiscal years 2001 through 2004'' and inserting ``fiscal years 2004 
through 2009''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1615

WILLIAM L. BOYD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARVIN T. RUNYON, JR., Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (CA-96-725-3) Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 8, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William L. Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Kelly Rae Rixner, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellee’s motion for summary judgment, denying Appellant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing his action filed under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-16 (West 1994 & Supp.1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion adopting the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Boyd v. Runyon , No. CA-96- 725-3 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 14, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of 1-800 CONTACTS, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan C. Coon, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, tothe best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

This certificationaccompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|        |   | /s/ Jonathan C. Coon    |   |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
|   |   | Date: August 14, 2007   |   |   |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of InVivo Therapeutics Holdings Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2011 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies, to his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                          |  |                                                                                   
|------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 12, 2013 |  | /s/ Michael J. Astrue                                                             
|                          |  | Michael J. Astrue, Interim Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
1

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

CONSTRUCTION WORKERS PENSION )

TRUST FUND LAKE COUNTY AND )

VICINITY, )

)

Plaintiff, ) Case No. 1:20-cv-3280

)

v. ) Hon. Gary S. Feinerman

)

BROCK INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, LLC ) Mag. Judge M. David Weisman

)

)

Defendant. )

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, CONSTRUCTION WORKERS PENSION TRUST FUND – LAKE COUNTY 

& VICINITY, hereby moves for dismissal of Plaintiff’s Complaint [Ex. 1] in its entirety without 

prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), with leave to reinstate on or before April 16, 

2021. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Sam W. Hensel

Sam Hensel

Attorney for Plaintiff

Asher, Gittler, & D’Alba, Ltd. 

200 West Jackson Blvd., Ste. 720

Chicago, IL 60606

(312) 263-1500

(312) 263-1520 (Fax)

sh@ulaw.com

IL ARDC: 6332797

Case: 1:20-cv-03280 Document #: 28 Filed: 12/08/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:75
March 20, 2007 

I have just reviewed the March 2007 Draft VVSG Recommendations to the EAC, 

especially Chapter 12 on Usability and Accessibility Requirements. 

It is wonderful to see a set of recommendations that is, itself, a model of clarity and 

usability. The layout makes finding each section and each recommended requirement 

easy. The pattern (template) for the different types of information under each 

requirement is clear, supporting skimming and searching as well as reading. The 

arrows help people find the beginning of each requirement and sub-requirement or 

guideline. The use of two types of arrows helps people distinguish between levels in 

the hierarchy of the requirements. Color and space are used well to make information 

easy to find and read. 

Thank you for paying attention to the presentation as well as to the substance of the 

draft recommendations. 

Janice (Ginny) Redish, Ph.D. 

President 

Redish & Associates, Inc.
CERTIFICATION              		EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Dale W. Church, certify that:

- I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Mechanical Technology Incorporated; - Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible 
	for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GREGORY LYNN HARRIS,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

MICHAEL BUDGE,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 09-15507

D.C. No. 2:05-cv-01191-JCMLRL

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 10, 2010** 

San Francisco, California

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TROTT and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Gregory Harris appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ

of habeas corpus, which alleged a violation of his right to due process under the

Fourteenth Amendment. Harris argues that there was insufficient evidence to

FILED

FEB 12 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

support his convictions for three charges: (a) Trafficking of a Controlled

Substance; (b) Conspiracy to Commit Robbery; and (c) Living From the Earnings

of a Prostitute. Harris filed his federal habeas petition after April 24, 1996;

therefore the provisions of the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act

(“AEDPA”) govern this case. Juan H. v. Allen, 408 F.3d 1262, 1270 (9th Cir.

2005) (citing Chein v. Shumsky, 373 F.3d 978, 983 (9th Cir. 2004) (en banc)). We

have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo a district

court’s denial of a state prisoner’s petition for habeas relief, Juan H., 408 F.3d at

1269 n.7, and we affirm. 

 In Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307(1979), the Supreme Court established

the “standard [that] is to be applied in a federal habeas corpus proceeding when the

claim is made that a person has been convicted in a state court upon insufficient

evidence.” Id. at 309. The Court held that “the critical inquiry on review of the

sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction must be . . . to

determine whether the record evidence could reasonably support a finding of guilt

beyond a reasonable doubt.” Id. at 318. “After AEDPA, we apply the standards of

Jackson with an additional layer of deference.” Juan H., 408 F.3d at 1274 (citing

28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)). After reviewing the record, we conclude that there was
3

sufficient evidence for a rational juror to find beyond a reasonable doubt that

Harris was guilty of these three offenses.

Harris also presented two uncertified issues in his opening brief, alleging

violations of his right to confront witnesses under the Sixth Amendment and right

to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. Because reasonable jurists

would not find either of the uncertified issues submitted to be debatable, we

decline to expand the certificate of appealability.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT  32


                                 CERTIFICATE OF
                           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Koger
Equity, Inc. (the "Company") that he has reviewed this quarterly report and, to
the best of his knowledge and belief, the quarterly report of the Company on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that
the quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the report not
misleading, and that the information contained in such report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of
such period and the results of operations and cash flows of the Company for such
period.


Dated:  November 11, 2003                  /s/ Thomas J. Crocker
                                        ------------------------------
                                              Thomas J. Crocker
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                        (Principal Executive Officer)
                                              Koger Equity, Inc.

Dated:  November 11, 2003                  /s/ Steven A. Abney
                                        ------------------------------
                                              Steven A. Abney
                                         Vice President, Finance and
                                          Chief Accounting Officer
                                        (Principal Financial Officer)
                                             Koger Equity, Inc.
9499.

#### Frey *v.*Thompson *et al.*

Decided October 16, 1918.

Rehearing denied January 14, 1919.

Action for damages; from Cobb superior court—Judge Patterson. December 22, 1916.

*Mozley & Gann, H. B. Moss, B. T. Frey,*for plaintiff in error. *J. Z. Foster,*contra.

Luke, J.

1. The real issue in this case is as to the proper location of a land line. There was evidence pro and eon, the jury found in favor of the defendant, there was evidence to authorize this finding, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge. *Osteen*v. *Wynn,*131 *Qa.*209 (02 S. E. 37, 127 Am. St. R. 212).

2. The charge of the court, when considered as a whole, was full, fair, and not subject to the criticisms offered. The court did not, for any - of the reasons assigned, err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, C. J., mid Jenkins, J., concur.*