alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Earl S. GORDON, Appellant, v. Alfred PAVOT and Greater Southeast Community Hospital, Appellees.

No. 03-7182.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Jan. 4, 2005.

Earl S. Gordon, Olney, MD, pro se.

Andrew Edward Vernick, Wharton, Levin, Ehrmantraut, Kline & Nash, Annapolis, MD, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before EDWARDS, RANDOLPH, and TATEL, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed August 8, 2003, be affirmed. The district court properly granted summary judgment on appellant’s claims of medical malpractice and lack of informed consent because those claims were not supported by expert testimony, which was required to establish the elements of his case. *See Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc.,*509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993); *Woldeamanuel v. Georgetown Univ. Hasp.,*703 A.2d 1243, 1244-45 (D.C.1997); *Lasley v. Georgetown Univ.,*688 A.2d 1381, 1384-85 (D.C.1997).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JESSE ADRIAN MARTINEZ,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00253-CR

Appeal from the

210th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20160D03012)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until August 14, 2018. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Ruben P. Morales, the Appellant’s attorney, prepare 

the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before August 14, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of July, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science

Forensic Science Standards Board Meeting

January 17, 2024, 12:30 p.m. – 2:30 p.m. ET

12:30 p.m. CALL MEETING TO ORDER - ROLL CALL Andy Smith

12:35 p.m. Standards and Documents in Process [Action/Vote/Information] J. Jones

1. SDO Published & OSAC Proposed

a. Registry Re-circulations: 0

 

b. Registry Petitions: 5 Petition Discussions - BALLOT DUE: 1/19/2024 [Vote]

i. 2022-N-0039, Collecting & Preserving Entomological Evidence from a Terrestrial Environ DeFrance/Kessler

ii. 2021-N-0018, Standard for On-Scene Collection and Preservation of Physical Evidence DeFrance/Kessler

iii. 2022-S-0036, Standard Method for the Chemical Testing of Copper and Lead from DeFrance/Kessler

Suspected Projectile Impacts

iv. SWGDE 2022-09-22, Best Practices for Remote Collection of Digital Evidence from Walraven/Sims

a Networked Computing Environment (22-F-003-1.0)

v. 2023-N-0025, Standard for Education and Training in Forensic Odontology Aschheim/Conlon

c. Registry Review: 0 New Introductions - PETITION DUE: 2/7/2024 [Review]

d. Registry Management: 2 SDO Reapproved Standards - PETITION DUE: 2/7/2024 [Review]

i. ASTM E3115-17(23), Standard Guide for Capturing Facial Images for Use with Facial Recognition Systems 

{Intro} Sims

ii. ASTM E3150-18(23), Standard Guide for Forensic Audio Lab Setup and Maintenance {Intro} Sims

e. FSSB Registry Continued Discussions

i. 2022-S-0024, BPR for Evaluative Forensic DNA Testimony [Attachment] A. Smith/J. Gurvis

ii. 2022-S-0029, Standard Guide for Interpretation and Reporting in Forensic A. Smith

Comparisons of Trace Materials - FSSB Perspective - Straw poll Results

2. Cross Cutting Documents: [Attachment]

3. Standards Open for Comment at SDOs: OSAC Website

2:00 p.m. Old Business [Information] Andy Smith

4. Ballot Update [Attachment] D. Sirk

5. FSSB Participation Requirements [Attachment] A. Smith

2:10 p.m. New Business [Action/Information] Andy Smith

6. OPO Update J. Jones

7. FSSB’s Entity’s Implementation Status V. Desiderio

8. FSSB Task Group Activities S. Walker

a. Training Standard Task Group Updates [Attachment]

2:25 p.m. Action Item Recap A. Getz

2:30 p.m. ADJOURN
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Standard Companies
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Frederic M. Poses, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

/s/ Frederic M. Poses
Frederic M. Poses
Chief Executive Officer





August 9, 2002
@d1 THRU xA— fF

= Ie eego | ‘|

/ i /
Yy 60 oe TM~ i SECTION C-C
g3V3— hte _|

"Sb lee) CZZZ
fl — i]

+B pe BIS i

IN B-B



2 2

SECTION E-E

ee Zi Li ‘GEE se
fSfxJA]  [eb[xx]A]  [px[A SECTION F-F féfxJA] [ébxJA]

i 6 4} 3
BEI) | BEI) | SRL) ci

val —
j f i f f j

SECTION G-G
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 28, 1999 AND CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 28, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                     225,986,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              214,967,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                17,544,000
<INVENTORY>                                243,522,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           711,043,000
<PP&E>                                     237,793,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              90,149,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             912,485,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      189,458,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       960,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 716,364,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               912,485,000
<SALES>                                    277,185,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           277,185,000
<CGS>                                      155,030,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              230,306,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,471,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             49,350,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                14,559,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         34,791,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                34,791,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 21.1**

**Subsidiariesof Tower Group, Inc.**
| Name                                      | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of  Incorporation** | ** ** | **Parent**              | ** ** | **Percentage  Ownership** |
|-------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------|------------|-------------------------|------------|---------------------------|
| Tower Insurance Company  of New York |       | New  York                          |       | Tower  Group, Inc. |       | 100%                      |
| Tower Risk Management  Corp               |       | New York                           |       | Tower Group, Inc.  |       | 100%                      |
| Tower National Insurance Company          |       | Commonwealth  of  Massachusetts    |       | Tower  Group, Inc. |       | 100%                      |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| By:    | /s/   Geoffrey S.M. Hedrick |   |
|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
|   | GEOFFREY   S.M. HEDRICK     |   |
|   | CHIEF   EXECUTIVE OFFICER   |   |
|   | FEBRUARY   7, 2011          |   |
|   |                        |   |
|   |                        |   |
|   | /s/   Ronald C. Albrecht    |   |
|   | RONALD   C. ALBRECHT        |   |
|   | CHIEF   FINANCIAL OFFICER   |   |
|   | FEBRUARY   7, 2011          |   |

 

----
**RB** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 3 - 0248 STATE OF MONTANA,

P laintiff and Appellee , v. DILLON PATRICK PIERCE ,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of

A ppellee ’s motion for a 3 0 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including November 9 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve its response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 1 2024

10/01/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0248
#### Red River Iron Company *v.*J. T. Henderson.

Bills and Notes — Set-off by Acceptor.

The acceptor of a hill of exchange can not set off against it in the hands of an indorsee claims against the payee which were ®ub- ■ sisting at the time of acceptance.

APPEAL PROM ESTILL CIRCUIT COURT.

December 30, 1872.

*Lilly, for appellants.*

*Riddell & Fluty, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The two papers sued on are bills of exchange.

It is so well settled that the acceptor of a bill of exchange can not set off against it, in the hands of an endorsee, claims against the payee subsisting at the time of acceptance, that we deem it unnecessary to cite authorities to sustain that position. Any other rule would destroy the value of mercantile paper.

Judgment *affirmed.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0382

IN THE MATTER OF:

R.Y.

Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel of 

record, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Respondent and Appellant in 

this matter shall file a response to this motion within thirty (30) days of 

the date of this Order. The response must be served upon all counsel of 

record, including the Attorney General, the County Attorney, and the 

Appellate Defender Division’s Office.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court give 

notice of this Order by mail to all counsel of record and to the 

Respondent and Appellant at her last known address.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 14 2023

12/14/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0382
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
    /s/ A. Keith WallA. Keith WallChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Date: September 30, 2008
**Exhibit 21**

 

**Subsidiaries of Village Bank and Trust Financial Corp.**

 

 

| Name of Subsidiary

                                                            | State of Organization |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
| Village Bank

                                                                  | Virginia

       |
| Village Bank Mortgage Corporation

(wholly-owned subsidiary of Village Bank)

  | Virginia              |
| Village Insurance Agency, Inc.

(wholly-owned subsidiary of Village Bank)

     | Virginia              |
| Village Financial Services Corporation

(wholly-owned subsidiary of Village Bank)    | Virginia              |
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of BG Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, T. Don Waddell, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ T. Don Waddell       |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | T. Don Waddell           |
|   | Chief Financial Officer  |
|   | BG Financial Group, Inc. |
|   | April 14, 2005           |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aspire International, Inc., for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, I, Bok Wong, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Aspire International, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:
  1. Such quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The information contained in such quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aspire International, Inc.
  Dated:  December 20, 2010
   Aspire International, Inc.
  By:
/s/ Bok Wong

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer
H. Res. 35

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 4, 1997.

Resolved, That the House has heard with profound

sorrow of the death of the Honorable Frank Tejeda, a

Representative from the State of Texas.

Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions

to the Senate and transmit a copy thereof to the family of

the deceased.

Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it

adjourn as a further mark of respect to the memory of the

deceased.

Attest:

Clerk.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

D.C., a child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D14-2213

[May 20, 2015]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Michael J. Orlando, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

14000924DL00A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Catherine Linton, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See S.D. v. State, 882 So. 2d 447 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

WARNER, GROSS and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 578 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 578

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the print of 
the Committee on Science entitled ``Unlocking Our Future: Toward a New 
   National Science Policy'' should serve as a framework for future 
       deliberations on congressional science policy and funding.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 1998

Mr. Sensenbrenner (for himself and Mr. Ehlers) submitted the following 
       resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Science

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the print of 
the Committee on Science entitled ``Unlocking Our Future: Toward a New 
   National Science Policy'' should serve as a framework for future 
       deliberations on congressional science policy and funding.

Whereas the United States must maintain and improve its preeminent position in 
        science and technology in order to advance human understanding of the 
        universe and all it contains, and to improve the lives, health, and 
        freedom of all peoples; and
Whereas the Committee on Science of the House of Representatives is hereby 
        submitting a print to Congress entitled ``Unlocking Our Future: Toward a 
        New National Science Policy'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the print from the Committee on Science entitled ``Unlocking Our 
Future: Toward a New National Science Policy'' should serve as a 
framework for future deliberations on congressional science policy and 
funding.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

	NO. 2-06-108-CV

IN RE KURBY DECKER	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator's petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL B:  DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: April 6, 2006
II 

Calendar No. 569 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4037 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 21, 2004 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

JUNE 7, 2004 

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 475 Kell Farm Drive in Cape Girardeau, 

Missouri, as the ‘‘Richard G. Wilson Processing and 

Distribution Facility’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 475 Kell Farm Drive in Cape Girardeau, Mis6 souri, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Richard G. 

7 Wilson Processing and Distribution Facility’’. 
2 

•HR 4037 RS 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘Richard G. Wilson Processing and Distribution 

6 Facility’’. 

Calendar No. 569 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4037 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostWilson Processing and Distribution Facility’’. Cape Girardeau, Missouri, as the ‘‘Richard G. al Service located at 475 Kell Farm Drive in 

JUNE 7, 2004 

Reported without amendment
#### STATE v. ROBINSON

No. 135P97

Case below: 125 N.C.App. 422

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 May 1997.
#### STATE v. PREVATTE

No. 126A95

Case below: Anson County Superior Court

Motion by defendant (Prevatte) for appropriate relief denied 8 May 1997.
Poster Submission Guidelines 

The Southeastern Virginia Energy Technology Partnership Forum will 

be held on April 13 at the Alumni House, College of William and Mary, 

Williamsburg, Virginia. (See attached flyer and draft agenda). We are 

seeking presenters to provide posters at the event. 

• Posters may be from: 

o Economic Development Agencies 

o Federal Laboratories 

o Academia 

o Industry 

• Exhibit display is from 8:00 am to 4:30 pm. Exhibit must be 

staffed from 12:00 to 12:45 and it is advised to also staff the 

exhibit during breaks 

• The poster session is designed to highlight energy technology 

capabilities and partnering opportunities. 

• Posters should fall into one of the six following nanotechnologyrelated areas: 

o Biofuels 

o Renewable Energy 

o Nuclear Energy 

o Major Investors/Users of Energy 

o Environmental Impact Mitigation 

o Energy Conservation and Efficiency 

 

• Posters should give sufficient details regarding the technical 

aspects of the technology, but should be general enough to be 

understood by a broad range of individuals, including nontechnical audiences. 

 
• Posters should be geared towards a business development audience 

and should highlight the commercial applications of the 

technology. 

• Posters should be no larger than 2 feet by 3 feet to fit on an easel. 

• Presenters will be given the opportunity to provide additional 

materials on a general handout table. 

• Those interested in presenting should provide a title and brief 

abstract of potential poster topics (50 words or less) to Charles 

Salahuddin at salahuddinc@mail.nih.gov by noon on Friday, 

April 8, 2011. 

• Abstracts will be reviewed and those selected to present a poster 

will be notified at the time of submission or if submitted on April 

8, no later than Monday, April 11, 2010. 

If you have any questions, please Charles Salahuddin at 

salahuddinc@mail.nih.gov or at (301) 846-5222.