alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE COMPANY DOES NOT FILE A CLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET., THEREFORE, THESE NOT
PROVIDED. 5-02(9), 5-02(21)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          34,511
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,628
<ALLOWANCES>                                       390
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         909,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                 129,569
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 840,619
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        305,992
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           287
<OTHER-SE>                                     467,228
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   840,619
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               119,276
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,047
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,147
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   230
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,313
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,404
<INCOME-TAX>                                        66
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             28,412
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,412
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05


</TABLE>
----

----

| Name                                    | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                                    |                          |
| Syneron GmbH.                           | Germany                       |
| Syneron Inc.                            | Delaware                      |
| Syneron Canada Corp.                    | Canada                        |
| Syneron Medical (HK) Ltd.               | Hong-Kong                     |
| Light Instruments Ltd.                  | Israel                        |
| Inlight Corp.                           | California                    |
| Rakuto Bio Technologies Ltd.            | Israel                        |
| Fluorinex Active Ltd.                   | Israel                        |
| Primaeva Medical, Inc.                  | California                    |
| Candela Corporation                     | Delaware                      |
| Candela KK                              | Japan                         |
| Candela Iberica, S.A.                   | Spain                         |
| Candela Deutschland GmbH                | Germany                       |
| Candela France SARL                     | France                        |
| Candela Italia                          | Italy                         |
| Candela (U.K.) Limited                  | U.K.                          |
| Candela Corporation Australia PTY, Ltd. | Australia                     |
| Candela International Holdco, B.V. | Netherland                    |
| Candela Portugal, Unipessoal Lda.       | Portugal                      |

----

----
#### STATE v. JOHNSON

No. 273P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 227

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 23 July 1997. Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 23 July 1997.
Exhibit 32.2  Certification  In connection with the annual report of Lotus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Yan Zeng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  March 28, 2011/s/ Yan ZengYan Zeng, Chief Financial Officer and principal financial and accounting officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Global Mainframe Corp.
 (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended April 30,
 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
 on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve Turcotte,
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer),
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
 pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
 Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
 all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Date:  November 13, 2007


/s/ Steve Turcotte
Name: Steve Turcotte
Title:  Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001104252
<NAME> DDI CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             845
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,479
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,711)
<INVENTORY>                                     21,391
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,312
<PP&E>                                         110,860
<DEPRECIATION>                                (47,288)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 353,739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,171
<BONDS>                                        471,609
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       162,905
<OTHER-SE>                                   (352,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   353,739
<SALES>                                         75,285
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,285
<CGS>                                           49,035
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,035
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,997
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,902)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        75
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,977)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,977)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.58)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JESSE YOUNG

No. 20 CR 00252

Honorable Judge Feinerman

 

ORDER

The defendant requested to proceed with a change-of-plea via videoconference. 

After conferral between the Chief Judge and the assigned judge, the Court granted 

the request as to proceed by video-conference. This Order memorializes the required 

findings under CARES Act § 15002(b)(2)(A). Specifically, the Chief Judge of the 

Northern District of Illinois finds as follows:

1. On March 29, 2020, the Judicial Conference of the United States found 

that emergency conditions due to the national emergency declared by the President 

have affected and will materially affect the functioning of the federal courts generally.

2. Pursuant to Section 15002(b)(2), I specifically find that the hearing on 

violation of MSR in this case cannot be conducted in person in this district without 

seriously jeopardizing public health and safety. The defendant is in pretrial custody, 

so an in-person change of plea hearing would require detained movement from the 

MCC to the Courthouse, with all the attendant in-person contact between United

States Marshals Service deputies, and the defendant. When transporting an incustody defendant, security personnel cannot maintain the six-foot distance 

Case: 1:20-cr-00252 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/18/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:298
recommended by current social-distancing guidelines. Moreover, after the change of 

plea, defendant will be returned to Livingston County Jail and will be held there 

through and including his sentencing, reintroducing the defendant to the personnel 

and the detainees in the facility.

On the case-specific reasons to proceed under Section 15002(b)(2)(A), the 

assigned judge finds:

1. Further delay of this MSR violation hearing would cause serious harm 

to the interests of justice. Defendant is presently in pretrial custody at the MCC. He 

desires to advance the case instead of waiting indefinitely for detainee production to 

reliably resume. A teleconference or video-conference would advance the case while 

minimizing potential exposure.

2. For those reasons, pursuant to Section 15002(b)(2)(A), proceeding with 

the MSR violation hearing by video-conference is necessary to avoid serious harm to 

the interests of justice.

ENTERED:

 

___________________________

Honorable Gary Feinerman

District Judge

DATE: 11/18/2021

Case: 1:20-cr-00252 Document #: 45 Filed: 11/18/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:299
##### 



Exhibit 99.2 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCEPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-7 (the Trust) I, Nancy H. Forte, a duly elected and acting officer of Citibank, N.A. (Indenture Trustee),
do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that: 1. I have reviewed and examined the performance by the Indenture Trustee of the application of
trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section
6.06 of the Indenture pursuant to which the Trusts notes were issued during the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2004 (the Relevant Year); and 2. Based upon my review and examination described in 1 above, and except as provided in the
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance, dated March 15, 2005,
prepared by the Ernst & Young LLP substantially in accordance with Section 4.05 of the Expense and
Indemnity Agreement, to the best of my knowledge, the application of trust money collected by the
Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the Indenture was
performed in accordance with the terms of the Indenture throughout the Relevant Year. CITIBANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee  By:
    /s/ Nancy H. Forte
Name: Nancy H. Forte
Title: Assistant Vice President Date: March 29, 2005
Exhibit 99.1        Officer's Certificate regarding Annual Statement of
                    Compliance of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.

                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

The undersigned officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies on behalf of the Company
and on his own behalf for purposes of the WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2004-AR6, as follows:

1. I am a duly appointed and qualified First Vice President of the Company.

2. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement related to the
above-referenced series of Certificates.

3. I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate on
behalf of the Company.

4. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and performance under this Agreement has been made under my
supervision.

5. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 29, 2005.





                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.


                     By: /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                         -------------------------------------
                         Thomas G. Lehmann
                         First Vice President
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT YUEZHEN YANG, AKA Yue Zhe n Yang, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 11-72898 Age n c y No. A099-399-966 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d August 13, 2013 ** San Fran c isc o , C a lifornia B e fore : HAW KINS, THOM AS, and M c KEOW N, C irc uit Judge s. Yue z he n Ya

ng pe titions for re vie wof the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ de c ision de ny ing he r c la i m s for a sy lum , withholding of re m ova l, a nd prote c tion 

# FIL ED AUG 16 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public a t ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).unde r the C onve n tion Aga inst Torture . W e de ny the pe tition. B e c a

u se the pa rtie s are fam ilia

r with the h i story of this c a se , we ne e d not re c ount it he re . Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the a dve rse c re dibility de te rm ination. Unde r the REAL ID Ac t, a

n inc onsiste nc y

c an support a

n a d ve rse c re dibility

finding e ve n if it doe s not go to the

he art of the c la im . Shre

stha v . Holde r , 590 F.3d 1034, 1043 (9th C ir. 2010). He re , Ya ng te s tifie d tha

t she did not orga

niz e a prote st until M ay 2005, we ll a fte r he r firing. B u t a n August 2004 lette r state d tha t fa c tory offic ia ls we re firing Ya

n g be c a u s e she wa s de ta ine d for orga niz ing sit-in de m onstra

tions. The im m igration judge (IJ) c onside re d Ya ng’ s e xpla

nation for this inc onsiste nc y and c onc l ude d tha

t Ya ng did not e xpla in the disc re pa nc y . Ya ng’ s e xpla

nation tha t a fa c tory le a de r c onc oc te d a re a son to fire he r that dire c tly c orre sponde d to e ve nts that oc c urre d ne arly

a y e ar late r wa s ne ithe r re a sona b le nor pla

usible . The re fore , the IJ did not ne e d to disc u ss he r re a sons for re je c ting the e xpla

nation in gre a te r de ta il. Se e Rizk

v . Holde r , 629 F.3d 1083, 1091 (9th C ir. 2011) (IJ did not ne e d to offe r “ e xpre ss, point-by -point re je c tion” whe n pe titione r “ did not offe r a re a s ona ble and pla

usible e xpla

nation for the disc re pa

n c ie s” ). Give n this inc o nsiste nc y , a

nd in light of the

tota l c irc um s ta

nc e s, the a ge nc y ’ s a d

ve rse c re d ibility

de te rm inat ion wa s re a sona ble . Shre stha , 590 F.3d a

t 1044. Abse nt c re d ible t e s tim ony , Ya

ng c ould not e sta

blish he r e l igibility

for a sy lum

or 2withholding of rem o v a l. She subm itte d no a dditiona l e vide n c e that would c om pe l the c onc lusion tha

t she is e ntitle d to re lie f unde r C onve ntion Aga inst Torture . PE T IT IO N DE NIE D.

3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

ART ASK AGENCY, )

) Case No.: 20-cv-4608

Plaintiff, ) 

) Judge Manish S. Shah

v. )

)

THE INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, )

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, )

PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED )

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED )

ON SCHEDULE A HERETO, )

)

Defendants. )

PLAINTIFF’S RENEWED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND DEFAULT 

JUDGMENT AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS IDENTIFIED IN SECOND AMENDED 

SCHEDULE A

Plaintiff ART ASK AGENCY (collectively “Plaintiff” or “Anne Stokes”) hereby moves

this Honorable Court for entry of Default and Default Judgment against the following 

Defendants, as identified by defendant number and name in the attached Second Amended 

Schedule A. Plaintiff files herewith a Memorandum of Law in support. 

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: January 12, 2021

By: s/Michael A. Hierl _ 

Michael A. Hierl (Bar No. 3128021)

William B. Kalbac (Bar No. 6301771)

Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd.

Three First National Plaza

70 W. Madison Street, Suite 4000

Chicago, Illinois 60602

(312) 580-0100 Telephone

mhierl@hsplegal.com

wkalbac@hsplegal.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ART ASK AGENCY

Case: 1:20-cv-04608 Document #: 66 Filed: 01/12/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:3146
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned attorney hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Motion was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court and served on all 

counsel of record and interested parties via the CM/ECF system on January 12, 2021. 

/s/ Michael A. Hierl

Michael A. Hierl

Case: 1:20-cv-04608 Document #: 66 Filed: 01/12/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:3147
No. 87-1421.

#### City of Columbus, Ohio, et al. *v.*Brunet et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                    STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                        CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18
                                 U.S.C. SS. 1350



         We, Charles E. Ramey, the chief executive officer US Dataworks, Inc.
(the "Company"), and John S. Reiland, the chief financial officer of the
Company, certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of
the United States Code that, to the best of our knowledge,

         (i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB/A, for the
period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report"), fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

         (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: February 18, 2004

                                             /s/ Charles E. Ramey
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Charles E. Ramey
                                             Chief Executive Officer


                                             /s/ John S. Reiland
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             John S. Reiland
                                             Chief Financial Officer




A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO US DATAWORKS, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY US DATAWORKS, INC. AND
FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
SUBROUTINE COPY(X,N,Y)
C
C     PURPOSE--THIS SUBROUTINE COPIES THE CONTENTS
C              OF THE SINGLE PRECISION VECTOR X INTO THE
C              SINGLE PRECISION VECTOR Y.
C     INPUT  ARGUMENTS--X      = THE SINGLE PRECISION VECTOR OF
C                                OBSERVATIONS TO BE COPIED. 
C                     --N      = THE INTEGER NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS
C                                IN THE VECTOR X. 
C     OUTPUT ARGUMENTS--Y      = THE SINGLE PRECISION VECTOR
C                                INTO WHICH THE COPIED DATA VALUES
C                                FROM X WILL BE SEQUENTIALLY PLACED.
C     OUTPUT--THE SINGLE PRECISION VECTOR Y.
C             WHICH WILL HAVE ITS
C             FIRST N ELEMENTS IDENTICAL
C             TO THE SINGLE PRECISION VECTOR X.
C     PRINTING--NONE UNLESS AN INPUT ARGUMENT ERROR CONDITION EXISTS. 
C     RESTRICTIONS--THERE IS NO RESTRICTION ON THE MAXIMUM VALUE
C                   OF N FOR THIS SUBROUTINE.
C     OTHER DATAPAC   SUBROUTINES NEEDED--NONE.
C     FORTRAN LIBRARY SUBROUTINES NEEDED--NONE.
C     MODE OF INTERNAL OPERATIONS--SINGLE PRECISION.
C     LANGUAGE--ANSI FORTRAN. 
C     COMMENT--THE FIRST ELEMENT OF X IS COPIED INTO THE FIRST
C              ELEMENT OF Y; THE SECOND ELEMENT OF X IS COPIED INTO
C              THE SECOND ELEMENT OF Y, ETC.
C     COMMENT--THE INPUT VECTOR X REMAINS UNALTERED.
C     REFERENCES--NONE.
C     WRITTEN BY--JAMES J. FILLIBEN
C                 STATISTICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY (205.03)
C                 NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS
C                 WASHINGTON, D. C. 20234
C                 PHONE--301-921-2315
C     ORIGINAL VERSION--NOVEMBER  1972. 
C     UPDATED         --NOVEMBER  1975. 
C
C---------------------------------------------------------------------
C
      DIMENSION X(1),Y(1)
C
      IPR=6
C
C     CHECK THE INPUT ARGUMENTS FOR ERRORS
C
      IF(N.LT.1)GOTO50
      IF(N.EQ.1)GOTO55
      HOLD=X(1)
      DO60I=2,N
      IF(X(I).NE.HOLD)GOTO90
   60 CONTINUE
      WRITE(IPR, 9)HOLD
      GOTO90
   50 WRITE(IPR,15) 
      WRITE(IPR,47)N
      RETURN
   55 WRITE(IPR,18) 
   90 CONTINUE
    9 FORMAT(1H ,108H***** NON-FATAL DIAGNOSTIC--THE FIRST  INPUT ARGUME
     1NT (A VECTOR) TO THE COPY   SUBROUTINE HAS ALL ELEMENTS = ,E15.8,6
     1H *****)
   15 FORMAT(1H , 91H***** FATAL ERROR--THE SECOND INPUT ARGUMENT TO THE
     1 COPY   SUBROUTINE IS NON-POSITIVE *****)
   18 FORMAT(1H ,100H***** NON-FATAL DIAGNOSTIC--THE SECOND INPUT ARGUME
     1NT TO THE COPY   SUBROUTINE HAS THE VALUE 1 *****)
   47 FORMAT(1H , 35H***** THE VALUE OF THE ARGUMENT IS ,I8   ,6H *****)
C
C-----START POINT-----------------------------------------------------
C
      DO100I=1,N
      Y(I)=X(I)
  100 CONTINUE
C
      RETURN
      END