alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

ASSERTIO THERAPEUTICS, INC. & 

APR APPLIED PHARMA RESEARCH SA, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

PATRIN PHARMA, INC., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

C.A. No. 20-cv-05055 (CPK/SF) 

AGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF 

JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION 

Plaintiffs Assertio Therapeutics, Inc. and APR Applied Pharma Research SA, along with 

Defendant Patrin Pharma, Inc., by their respective attorneys, having settled their dispute on terms 

mutually acceptable to the parties, hereby move this Court for entry of the attached Judgment 

and Order for Permanent Injunction. Entry of the attached Judgment and Order of Permanent 

Injunction will bring the present action to a conclusion. 

Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/Emer L. Simic 

Robert F. Green (ARDC No. 1045466) 

rgreen@greengriffith.com 

Christopher T. Griffith (ARDC No. 6197487) 

cgriffith@greengriffith.com 

Emer L. Simic (ARDC No. 6297628) 

esimic@greengriffith.com 

Olga Schwier (ARDC No. 6331520) 

 oschwier@greengriffith.com 

GREEN, GRIFFITH & BORG-BREEN LLP

City Place, Suite 3900 

676 North Michigan Avenue 

Chicago, Illinois 60611 

Telephone: (312) 883-8000 

Facsimile: (312) 883-8001 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Assertio Therapeutics, Inc. & 

APR Applied Pharma Research SA 

Dated: March 9, 2021 

By: /s/ Frederick R. Ball 

Frederick R. Ball 

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

100 High Street, Suite 2400 Boston, MA 

02110-1724 Telephone: (857) 488-4229 

Facsimile: (312) 277-1945 

E-mail: FRBall@duanemorris.com 

Patrick C. Gallagher, Ph.D 

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

1875 NW Corporate Boulevard, Suite 300 Boca 

Raton, FL 33431-8561 

Telephone: (561) 962-2131 

E-mail: PCGallgher@duanemorris.com 

Case: 1:20-cv-05055 Document #: 29 Filed: 03/09/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:200
– 2 – 

Dennis A. Bennett 

GLOBAL PATENT GROUP, LLC 

East Professional and Medical Center Building 

Second Floor 

Carretera #3 Km 19.9 

Canóvanas, Puerto Rico 00729 

Of Counsel for Plaintiffs 

Assertio Therapeutics, Inc. & 

APR Applied Pharma Research SA 

Andrea M. Augustine 

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

190 South LaSalle Street, Suite 3700 Chicago, 

IL 60603-3433, USA 

Telephone: (312) 499 6771 

E-mail: amaugustine@duanemorris.com 

Jiazhong Luo, Ph.D. 

DUANE MORRIS LLP 

30 South 17th Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-4196 Telephone: (215) 

979-1809 

E-mail: jluo@duanemorris.com 

Attorneys for Patrin Pharma, Inc.

 

Case: 1:20-cv-05055 Document #: 29 Filed: 03/09/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:201
– 3 – 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on March 9, 2021, the foregoing AGREED 

MOTION and JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION identified 

therein were filed with the Clerk of Court using the ECF system and in compliance with the 

General Order on Electronic Case Filing. As such, these documents were served on all parties 

who are deemed to have consented to electronic service. 

/s/ Emer L. Simic 

Case: 1:20-cv-05055 Document #: 29 Filed: 03/09/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:202
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly Report of Mercari Communications Group, Ltd. on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John P. Kanouff, Treasurer/Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   



|/s/ John P. KanouffJohn P. KanouffTreasurer(Principal Financial Officer)
|------------------------------------------------------------------------



|October 12, 2007
|----------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 13.14

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Inmarsat Launch Company Limited (the "Company") for the annual period ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Periodic Report"), I, Rick Medlock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  | /s/RICK MEDLOCKRick Medlock Chief Financial Officer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------

Date:
April 29, 2005

---



QuickLinks
- GA Series GA110 & GA200
Contents
- Set Up
- Power Requirements
- Calibration
- External Calibration
- Operation
- Taring
- Batching
- Checkweighing
- Operating Parameters
Selectable Integration
Stability Range
Display Decimal
Tare Function
Automatic Zeroing
RS232 Interface
Selection Procedure
Below Balance Weighing

- Care And Maintenance
- Accessories and Replacement Parts
- Troubleshooting
- Service Information
- Performance Specifications
- Warranty
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Innovative Solutions andSupport, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.        The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

2.        The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:                   | /s/ GEOFFREY S.M. HEDRICK |   |
|-----------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                  | GEOFFREY S.M. HEDRICK     |   |
|                  | CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER   |   |
|                  |                      |   |
|                  |                      |   |
|                  | /s/ JOHN C. LONG          |   |
|                  | JOHN C. LONG              |   |
|                  | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER   |   |
|                  |                      |
|                  |                      |
| February 3, 2010 |                      |
| GEOFFREY S.M. HEDRICK |                      |

 

----
EXHIBIT 26

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 328-26 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:7561
Document title: Amazon.com: Gyroor T581 Hoverboard 6.5" Off Road All Terrain Hoverboard with Bluetooth Speaker and Two-Wheel Self Balancing Hoverboard...

Capture URL: https://www.amazon.com/Gyroor-Hoverboard-Bluetooth-Two-Wheel-Balancing/dp/B07PG8VYBK/ref=sr_1_2?...

Capture timestamp (UTC): Mon, 21 Jun 2021 13:28:26 GMT Page 1 of 6

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 328-26 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 2 of 7 PageID #:7562
Document title: Amazon.com: Gyroor T581 Hoverboard 6.5" Off Road All Terrain Hoverboard with Bluetooth Speaker and Two-Wheel Self Balancing Hoverboard...

Capture URL: https://www.amazon.com/Gyroor-Hoverboard-Bluetooth-Two-Wheel-Balancing/dp/B07PG8VYBK/ref=sr_1_2?...

Capture timestamp (UTC): Mon, 21 Jun 2021 13:28:26 GMT Page 2 of 6

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 328-26 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 3 of 7 PageID #:7563
Document title: Amazon.com: Gyroor T581 Hoverboard 6.5" Off Road All Terrain Hoverboard with Bluetooth Speaker and Two-Wheel Self Balancing Hoverboard...

Capture URL: https://www.amazon.com/Gyroor-Hoverboard-Bluetooth-Two-Wheel-Balancing/dp/B07PG8VYBK/ref=sr_1_2?...

Capture timestamp (UTC): Mon, 21 Jun 2021 13:28:26 GMT Page 3 of 6

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 328-26 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 4 of 7 PageID #:7564
Document title: Amazon.com: Gyroor T581 Hoverboard 6.5" Off Road All Terrain Hoverboard with Bluetooth Speaker and Two-Wheel Self Balancing Hoverboard...

Capture URL: https://www.amazon.com/Gyroor-Hoverboard-Bluetooth-Two-Wheel-Balancing/dp/B07PG8VYBK/ref=sr_1_2?...

Capture timestamp (UTC): Mon, 21 Jun 2021 13:28:26 GMT Page 4 of 6

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 328-26 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 5 of 7 PageID #:7565
Document title: Amazon.com: Gyroor T581 Hoverboard 6.5" Off Road All Terrain Hoverboard with Bluetooth Speaker and Two-Wheel Self Balancing Hoverboard...

Capture URL: https://www.amazon.com/Gyroor-Hoverboard-Bluetooth-Two-Wheel-Balancing/dp/B07PG8VYBK/ref=sr_1_2?...

Capture timestamp (UTC): Mon, 21 Jun 2021 13:28:26 GMT Page 5 of 6

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 328-26 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 6 of 7 PageID #:7566
Document title: Amazon.com: Gyroor T581 Hoverboard 6.5" Off Road All Terrain Hoverboard with Bluetooth Speaker and Two-Wheel Self Balancing Hoverboard...

Capture URL: https://www.amazon.com/Gyroor-Hoverboard-Bluetooth-Two-Wheel-Balancing/dp/B07PG8VYBK/ref=sr_1_2?...

Capture timestamp (UTC): Mon, 21 Jun 2021 13:28:26 GMT Page 6 of 6

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 328-26 Filed: 07/13/21 Page 7 of 7 PageID #:7567
HMM Reference NIST Technical Note 2205: Item 4 Solar Panel Raised Up

Item 4 Solar Panel Raised Up – Low curved edge can trap debris.

Low curved edge Large gap

Note: Selected photographs are included to illustrate each HMM hardening item. Additional vulnerabilities or hardening items may be seen in the photographs, but those are highlighted within their specific HMM item.
There is no CAD drawing for 

Item 4: Solar Panel Raised Up 

Please see photographs for illustrations.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.03
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-3 of our report dated
November 7, 1996 on the Provider Segment of Magellan Health Services, Inc.
included in Crescent Real Estate Equities Company's Form 8-K dated January 29,
1997, as amended by Form 8-K/A on July 2, 1997, and to all references to our
Firm included in this Registration Statement.
 
                                            ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
 
Atlanta, Georgia
June 23, 1998
#### George T. Wood *v.*B. F. Burris and Wife.

Accounts, Action On — On Whose Credit Sold.

A creditor can not recover against a wife for goods sold to the ' husband and daughter, without showing that the credit was given to her.

APPEAL FROM MASON CIRCUIT COURT.

January 25, 1872.

*Throop, for appellant.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The testimony does not show that the articles delivered to the husband and daughter of the appellees were sold on her credit or charged to her. There is no evidence tending to show that she authorized appellant to sell to her husband or daughter, or that she knew prior to the execution of the note sued on, that he looked to her for the payment of the accounts embraced in said note. The appellant can not recover against the appellee, without showing that the credit was given to her. Sub. Section 1, section 1, article 2, chapter 47, Revised Statutes. Eastwood vs. Bryan, 7 Bush 509.
Lease Agreement Amendment No.1, Dated January 23,2001



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 LEASE AGREEMENT 
  
 AMENDMENT No. 1 
  
 THIS AGREEMENT, entered into by and between Duke-Weeks Realty, L.P., hereinafter referred to as “Lessor” and “Landlord”) and Lifecodes
Corporation hereinafter referred to as “Lessee” or “Tenant”), dated this 23 day of Jan, 2001. 
  
 WHEREAS, the parties entered into a Lease Agreement dated the 15th day of February 1996, which is incorporated herein by reference (hereinafter referred
to as the “Lease”) concerning 15,480 square feet of space located in the building known as Airpark Business Center III; and, 
  
 WHEREAS, NWI Warehouse Group, L.P. has merged with Weeks Realty, L.P.; and, 
  
 WHEREAS, Weeks Realty, L.P. has merged with Duke Realty, L.P. and the name of the combined entity is Duke-Weeks Realty,
L.P.; and, 
  
 WHEREAS, the name of the tenant has changed from
Microdiagnostics, Inc. to Lifecodes Corporation; and, 
  
 WHEREAS,
the parties desire to amend said Lease. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, FOR
GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATIONS, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree to amend the Lease as follows: 
  
 WITNESSETH: 
  

	 	1.	The name of the Landlord and Lessor is changed to Duke-Weeks Realty, L.P. 

  

	 	2.	Beginning February 1, 2001 the size of the Premises shall be increased from 15,420 to 17,897 square feet. The new Premises is shown on attached Exhibit A.


  

	 	3.	The Annual Net Rent shall be increased from $138,780.00 to $151,165.00. 

  

	 	4.	Except as amended herein and by all previous amendments, the Lease shall be for the same terms and conditions as set forth therein and all unaffected portions of said Lease shall
remain in full force and effect. 

  
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Agreement on the day and date set forth below. 
  

									
	 	 	 	 	Landlord: Duke-Weeks Realty, L.P.
					
	 	 	 	 	 	 	By:	 	 Duke-Weeks Realty Corporation,
 General
Partner


  

									
				
	Dated 1-23-01	 	 	 	By:	 	/s/    JOHN W. NELLEY,
JR.        
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 John W. Nelley, Jr.
 Managing Director


  

									
	 	 	 	 	Tenant: Lifecodes Corporation
				
	Dated 1-23-01	 	 	 	By:	 	/s/    BRUCE BOEKO        
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Bruce Boeko
	 	 	 	 	 	 	Title:	 	G.M.










 EXHIBIT A
#### S. S. Potter *v.*R. T. Young.

Evidence — Parol—Time of Issuance of Restraining Order.

Parol evidence is not admissible to sbow that a restraining order signed by the special judge was signed on a date other than that on which he presided.

*382APPEAL FROM WARREN CIRCUIT COURT.

January 23, 1873.

*Gorin, for appellant.*

*Rodes & Clark, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Pryor :

The petition upon which the injunction was obtained restraining the collection of the judgment against the appellant shows that it was rendered during a regular term of the Warren Circuit Court by a special judge elected and qualified as provided by law.

No fraud is alleged with reference to the judgment, or the proceeding under which it was obtained. The record also- shows that the signature of the judge is annexed to- the orders of the court made on the day the judgment was rendered. He was then clothed with judicial power, and parol proof will not be permitted to destroy the verity of such a record by showing that the judge in. fact signed the order on some other day than that on which he presided. Blackstone says: “That a court of record is that where the acts and judicial proceedings are enrolled in parchment for a perpetual memorial and testimony, and are of such high and supereminent authority that their truth 'is not to- be called in question.” To this rule there are exceptions, as where a judgment has been obtained by fraud, but record evidence would constitute but little protection to litigants if permitted to be attacked by reason of the judge failing to sign them- on the day, or have them read over in accordance with a statute when properly construed is merely directory.

The judgment sustaining the demurrer is *affirmed.*
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of GFI Group Inc.  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of GFI Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Gooch, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to the 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



Date:
March 2, 2009

/s/ MICHAEL GOOCH Michael Gooch Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MIGUEL MENDOZA,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00230-CR

Appeal from the

41st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20140D02819)

O R D E R

The Appellant’s brief was due with this Court on October 26, 2018 with three final

extensions having been granted. Appellant’s attorney, Ms. Veronica Teresa Lerma filed a sixth 

motion for extension of time on October 26, 2018 requesting an additional 22 days to file his 

brief. However, before the Court acts on the motion it will be necessary for the trial court to 

conduct a hearing. 

Therefore, it is ORDERED that the trial court conduct a hearing in order to determine if 

appellant wishes to continue the appeal and if appellant has been deprived of effective assistance 

of counsel. 

Further, the trial court shall forward its findings to the District Clerk of El Paso County, 

Texas, on or before November 15, 2018. The District Clerk shall prepare and forward a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and forward the same to this Court on or 

before November 25, 2018. Further, the transcription of the hearing shall be prepared, certified 

and filed with this Court on or before November 25, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of October, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

128218 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver & (24) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, WENDY BETH ADELSON, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 128218 COA: 258539 Oakland CC: 01-180995-FH 02-185164-FH OAKLAND CIRCUIT JUDGE, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to a ppeal the February 25, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this C ourt. The motion for bond pending appeal is DENIED as moot.

l0123 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 30, 2006

Clerk
Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 576-1 Filed: 07/14/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:14067
 ,_ oN> W6km ! Za\mMk ;><6sk>a@oN> <6kM BYaz f>kr6T\m <6sk>= ;} mM>df>WRZR\6f}R\Uu^<mRa\

af=>f'a\JJs6\06R;am6\M6=maW6}aD6WWa@Rmk>ZdWa}>>k6\=;affaz>=Za\>}IaZ;6\Vk

IR>\=k6\=A6ZRWR>kmad6}aERmk=>;mk

 'a\JJs6\ 06T;am6\k ;tkR\>kk f>dsm6mRa\ M6k ;>>\fsR\>= 6\= Rmk$Z6~a\kmaf>f6`VR\J 6\=

Z7fV>mkM7f?M6x>=fbdd>=kRJ\RG<6\mW}

 /\af6;asm-6f<M'a\JJs6\06R;am6\aF<R6XW}=><W6f>=:=GW>=HfRmk;6\Vhvdm<}

R\&MR\6

! %>Hf>oN>df>WRZR\7f}R\Uw\<mRa\af=>fz6k>\m>f>=nO>6y>g9K>Za\qOW}]>nl8W>la@)}faag	30

9g>6eefa|SZ6n>W}30.!!

" *}iaaf
40Lakk dfaGm Z6fJT\Rk 6ddfa{RZ6m>W}!maa@Rmk\>m k6X>k 2M>JfakkdfaGm

Z7fJR\Rk;6k>=a\mP><aZd7\}k\>mk6W>kZR\skpM><akmka@dfa=s<mkkaW=

 *}faaf40 \>m dfaGm Z6fJR\ Rk 6ddfa{RZ6m>W}   ma ! a@Rmk \>mk6X>k 2M> Jfakk dfaGm

Z7fJR\ Rk ;6k>=a\ mM> <aZd6\}k\>mk6W>kZR\tkpM><akmka@dfa=s<mkkaW=6\=7XW pP>amM>f

<aZd:}<akmk6\=>{d>\k>k


+=><W6f?s\=>fd>\7Xm}a@d>jsf}s_=>fpM>W6zka@oN>5\Rm>=1m6m>ka@$[>fT<6mQ6mpP>

Ccf>JaR\JRkmfs>6\=<aff><m

({><tm>=a\#  



Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 576-1 Filed: 07/14/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:14068
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 224 (Thursday, November 20, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 69117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27604]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:16 a.m. on 
Tuesday, November 18, 2014, the Board of Directors of the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters 
related to the Corporation's supervision, corporate, and resolution 
activities.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice 
Chairman Thomas M. Hoenig, seconded by Director Jeremiah O. Norton 
(Appointive), concurred in by Director Richard Cordray (Director, 
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau), Director Thomas J. Curry 
(Comptroller of the Currency), and Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, that 
Corporation business required its consideration of the matters which 
were to be the subject of this meeting on less than seven days' notice 
to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; 
that the public interest did not require consideration of the matters 
in a meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be 
considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(4), 
(c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10) of the 
``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), (c)(6), 
(c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550-17th Street NW., Washington, DC.

    Dated: November 18, 2014.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
 Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-27604 Filed 11-18-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P
No. 87-6590.

#### Morris *v.*Doan et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Case: 1:20-cv-05039 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 01/14/21 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:317
Case: 1:20-cv-05039 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 01/14/21 Page 2 of 12 PageID #:318
Case: 1:20-cv-05039 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 01/14/21 Page 3 of 12 PageID #:319
Case: 1:20-cv-05039 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 01/14/21 Page 4 of 12 PageID #:320
Case: 1:20-cv-05039 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 01/14/21 Page 5 of 12 PageID #:321
Case: 1:20-cv-05039 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 01/14/21 Page 6 of 12 PageID #:322
Case: 1:20-cv-05039 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 01/14/21 Page 7 of 12 PageID #:323
Case: 1:20-cv-05039 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 01/14/21 Page 8 of 12 PageID #:324
Case: 1:20-cv-05039 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 01/14/21 Page 9 of 12 PageID #:325
Case: 1:20-cv-05039 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 01/14/21 Page 10 of 12 PageID #:326
Case: 1:20-cv-05039 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 01/14/21 Page 11 of 12 PageID #:327
Case: 1:20-cv-05039 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 01/14/21 Page 12 of 12 PageID #:328