alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 68 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        March 11, 1997.
Whereas the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security Between the United States 
        of America and Japan is critical to the security interests of the United 
        States, Japan, and the countries of the Asia-Pacific region;
Whereas the security relationship between the United States and Japan is the 
        foundation for the security strategy of the United States in the Asia-
        Pacific region;
Whereas strong bilateral security ties between the two countries provide a key 
        stabilizing influence in an uncertain post-cold war world;
Whereas this bilateral security relationship makes it possible for the United 
        States and Japan to preserve their interests in the Asia-Pacific region;
Whereas forward-deployed forces of the United States are welcomed by allies of 
        the United States in the region because such forces are critical for 
        maintaining stability in East Asia;
Whereas regional stability has undergirded East Asia's economic growth and 
        prosperity;
Whereas the recognition by allies of the United States of the importance of 
        United States armed forces for security in the Asia-Pacific region 
        confers on the United States irreplaceable good will and diplomatic 
        influence in that region;
Whereas Japan's host nation support is a key element in the ability of the 
        United States to maintain forward-deployed forces in that country;
Whereas the Governments of the United States and Japan, in the Special Action 
        Committee on Okinawa Final Report issued by the United States-Japan 
        Security Consultative Committee established by the two countries, made 
        commitments to reducing the burdens of United States armed forces on the 
        people of Japan, especially the people of Okinawa;
Whereas such commitments must maintain the operational capability and readiness 
        of United States forces; and
Whereas gaining the understanding and support of the people of Japan, especially 
        the people of Okinawa, in fulfilling these commitments is crucial to the 
        effective implementation of the Treaty: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security Between 
        the United States of America and Japan remains vital to the 
        security interests of the United States and Japan, as well as 
        the countries of the Asia-Pacific region; and
            (2) the people of Japan, especially the people of Okinawa, 
        deserve special recognition and gratitude for their 
        contributions toward ensuring the Treaty's implementation and 
        regional peace and stability.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### RICHARDSON v. BP OIL CO.

No. 557P96

Case below: 124 N.C.App. 509

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 May 1997.

Justice Whichard recused.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The Company does not file a classified balance sheet, therefore these not
provided. 5-02(9), 5-02(21)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,640
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,732
<ALLOWANCES>                                       263
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         840,624
<DEPRECIATION>                                 117,110
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 746,473
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        248,901
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           285
<OTHER-SE>                                     465,323
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   746,473
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,075
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,435
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    38
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,267
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,235
<INCOME-TAX>                                       610
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,625
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,625
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.55
        

</TABLE>
### NU M BER S 13- 08- 0011 2-C V 13 -08 -00 728- CV 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ IN THE INTEREST OF C.W. , A CHILD

____ ____ ____ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ On ap pe al f rom th e 1 56t h Dist rict C ou rt of Sa n Patricio C ou nty , T exas .

____ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON B ef or e Just i ces Ro dr i guez, G ar za, and V el a M em or andu m O pi ni on P erC ur i am Appel lan t, Cha d W eacht er , father of C. W ., attempt s t o appea l a j udg ment ter minat ing the parental r ig hts of the mot her of C. W ., M. H. , ent ered on Febr uar y 6, 20 08, in the 1 56 D is tr ict C our t of San Patr ic io Cou nty , Tex as, i n c ause number S- 07- 5506- FL- B. th The j u d g me n t e n t e re d o n F e b r u a r y 6 , 2 0 0 8 , s e v e re d t h e c a s e o f C h a d W e a c h t e r , and
ass ig ned i t c ause number S- 07- 5506- FL- B- 1.2

On O cto ber

21, 2008, the Cler k o f t h is C our

t not ified appel lan t t hat t he not ic e of appe al be ars th e i nc or rect c au s e nu mb er , S- 07
- 55 06
- F L- B, an d th at th e c or rect cau se number i s S -0 7- 5506- FL- B- 1. Not ic e of thi s d efect w as g iv en s o tha t s teps co uld be t aken to c or re ct the d e fe ct , i f it coul d be done. Appel lan t w as adv is ed th at, if proper noti ce of app eal w as no t f iled in the t rial cou rt within t en days f rom the d ate o f rece ipt of

this Court’s letter , t he matt er

w oul d be re ferred to the Cou rt for further act ion

. To date, no respon se has been recei v ed from a ppel lan t. Gi v en th at ap pel lan t, Ch a d W e a cht er , w as not a par ty to the j udg ment ent ered on Febr uar y 6, 2008, in caus e number S-07 -5 506- FL- B, his appeal is ordered SEVER ED and
w il l be doc ket ed i n thi s C our t under caus e number

13- 08- 00728- CV

. The appeal of M. H. , w il l re main under

the caus e number

13- 08- 00112- CVand proceed i n due course. Ap pe l l an t, Ch ad W ea c ht er , ha s fai l ed t o am en d th e no ti c e of a pp ea l w i th i n th e ti me presc ri bed b y t his C our t. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.1( f), 37 .1. The C our t, hav ing ex amined and full y co nsi dered th e doc uments on fil e, i s o f the opi nio n tha t t he ap p e a l shoul d be dis mis sed for w ant o f jur is dicti on. Acc ordin g ly , t he appe al in caus e number 13- 08- 00728- CV is hereby DI SM ISSE D FO R W AN T OF JU RI SD IC TION

. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42. 3(a), (c ). P E RC U R I A M Me moran dum Opi nio n del iv ered and filed thi s t he 8t h day

of Janua ry , 200 9.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

NICHOLAS MARQUEZ, individually and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff,

v.

GOOGLE LLC,

Defendant.

Civil Action No.: 1:20-cv-04454

Judge: Virginia M. Kendall

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Plaintiff Nicholas Marquez hereby dismisses the above-entitled action pending before this 

Court (i.e., all claims remaining before this Court that have not been remanded to state court) 

without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i).

Dated: January 20, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Frank S. Hedin .

Frank S. Hedin

HEDIN HALL LLP

Frank S. Hedin**

David W. Hall*

1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1140

Miami, FL 33131

Tel: (305) 357-2107

Fax: (305) 200-8801

fhedin@hedinhall.com

dhall@hedinhall.com

BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.

Joseph I. Marchese*

Philip L. Fraietta*

888 Seventh Avenue

New York, NY 10019

Tel: (646) 837-7150

Fax: (212) 989-9163

jmarchese@bursor.com

Case: 1:20-cv-04454 Document #: 24 Filed: 01/20/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:107
2

pfraietta@bursor.com

Counsel for Plaintiff and the Putative Class

WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN & 

HERZ LLC

Carl V. Malmstrom

111 W. Jackson Blvd., Suite 1700

Chicago, IL 60604

Tel: (312) 391-5059

malmstrom@whafh.com

Local Counsel for Plaintiff and the Putative Class

* Pro Hac Vice Application Forthcoming

** Appearing Pro Hac Vice

Case: 1:20-cv-04454 Document #: 24 Filed: 01/20/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:108
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Frank S. Hedin, certify that on January 20, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of 

such filing to all attorneys of record.

I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

By: /s/ Frank S. Hedin .

Frank S. Hedin

Case: 1:20-cv-04454 Document #: 24 Filed: 01/20/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:109
Saturday, September 12, 2020 at 00:33:34 Eastern Daylight Time 

Subject: Dra$ NISTIR 8312 

Date: Thursday, September 10, 2020 a t 3:12:07 PM Eastern Daylight Time 

From: ldennison@agdavis.com 

To: NIST Explainable AI 

CC: dennison2@aol.com 

AEachments: image001.jpg 

Comment Template for First Public Dra$ of Four Principles of Explainable ArOficial Intelligence (Dra$ NISTIR 

8312) 

Regarding four principles of explainable AI 

ExplanaOon 

Interpretable 

ExplanaOon Accuracy 

Knowledge Limits 

All four principles assume Ody and complete data in all fields of every record. As that never happens I look at 

data for answers to “what is missing?” and thus I write excepOon reports to show me missing field data that 

might sOll be required. 

Outliers are hidden as one unit in meta data and I also want to get reports on the outliers that don’t fit in any 

of the four categories. For example when I was in two year contract at General Motors Powertrain two 

databases did not balance anyOme a new department was created by one of the databases. I needed to 

create the same new departments in the second database then establish the data transferred accurately into 

the sub-ledger. 

To sum, is there any data not being quanOfied and what happens to it? What does AI parOally know about 

this data? Can human review of it clarify and does more code need to be wri`en to accommodate the 

abnormaliOes? 

When I was a Financial Analyst in the past I spent most Ome controlling the 20% whereas I had no issues with 

the data flow of the 80%. In reality maybe 99% of the data flowed without issue and I micromanaged and 

troubleshooted that last 1% which was different but existed every month. Just saying. 

Sincerely, 

Lisa Dennison 

Quality Control Manager 

Customer Service 

ldennison@agdavis.com 

A.G. Davis Gage & Engineering Co. / AA Gage 

6533 Sims Drive, Sterling Heights, MI 48313 

(586) 977-9000 x255 

Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Emission Differentials Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended April 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James Durward, President and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  August 28, 2006

By:  /s/ James Durward

Name: James Durward

Title:    President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal

Accounting Officer)
#### Wm. D. Hagar and Wesley L. Jukes v. William C. Coup.

*Jurisdiction of municipal cowrt*— Non-rmdence.

The Superior Court oí Detroit has no jurisdiction unless at least one of the parties is a resident of the city. Act 97 of 1879.

The right to sue out a writ of error should be contested upon a motion to dismiss the writ, supported by proper showing.

Error to Superior Court of Detroit.

Jan. 10.

Jan. 18.

Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

Reversed.

*George S. Hosmer (Griffin, Dickinson, Thurber & Hosmer)*for appellant.

Where residence is jurisdictional it must be averred in the pleadings: *Turner v. Bank of North*
      *55
      *America*4 Dal. 11; *Bingham v. Cabot*3 Dal. 382 ; *Emory v. Grenough*id. 369; *Turner v. Enrille*4 Dal. 7; *Mossman v. Higginson*id. 12; *Abercrombie v. Dupuis*1 Cr. 343; *Course v. Stead*4 Dal. 22; *Wood v. Wagnon*2 Or. 9; *Capron v. Van Hoorden*id. 126; *Hodgson v. Bowerbank*5 Cr. 303; *Montalet v. Murray*4 Cr. 46 ; *Sullivan v. Fulton Steamboat Co.*6 Wh. 450; *Jackson v. Twentyman*2 Pet. 136; *Morgan v. Callender*4 Cr. 370; *Brown v. Keene*8 Pet. 112; *Dred Scott v. Sandford*19 How. 402; the averment cannot be waived, for consent does not give jurisdiction: *Jackson v. Ashton*8 Pet. 148; *Exp. Schollenberger*96 U. S. 377; see *Hornthall v. Collector*9 Wal. 560; *Mason v. Rollins*13 Wal. 602; *Exp. Smith*94 U. S. 455.

*Henry M. Cheever*for appellee.

Michigan cases in which judgment has been held void for want of a showing of jurisdiction on the face of the pleadings are cases in which judgment was taken by default: *Outhwite v. Porter*13 Mich. 533; *McEwan v. Zimmer*38 Mich. 765 ; *Booth v. Conn. Mut. life Ins. Co.*43 Mich. 299; *Bagley v. Pridgeon*42 Mich. 550; *Atkins v. Borstler 46*Mich. 552; where both parties are residents of the State one of them must live in the county where suit is brought: *Turrill v. Walker*4 Mich. 179; *Haywood v. Johnson*41 Mich. 598.

Marston, J.

¥e are of opinion that under the Act of 1879 and the case of *Bagley v. Pridgeon*42 Mich. 551, residence of at least one of the parties in the city of Detroit is essential to confer jurisdiction upon the Superior Court, and that the parties cannot confer jurisdiction where none is given by the statute. Any other view would enable parties, if so disposed, to submit to and bring into that court all classes of personal actions from any part of the State.-

If the appellees disputed the right of counsel to sue out *56the writ of error in this case, they should on motion and a proper showing have moved to dismiss the writ.

The judgment must be reversed with.costs of both courts.

The other Justices concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
         REGISTRANT'S  UNAUDITED  BALANCE  SHEET AS OF AUGUST  31,  1997 AND THE
         UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE
         SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
         SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000835585
<NAME>                        C-Phone Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                   2,441,829
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              549,638
<ALLOWANCES>                               150,000
<INVENTORY>                              1,279,202
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         4,237,661
<PP&E>                                   1,123,904
<DEPRECIATION>                             888,303
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           4,534,354
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      533,709
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    52,034
<OTHER-SE>                               3,948,611
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             4,534,354
<SALES>                                    752,910
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           760,949
<CGS>                                    1,319,422
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            1,320,434
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            30,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             447
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (3,161,968)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (3,161,968)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                            (3,161,968)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.62)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 2

Case: 1:20-cv-04813 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/17/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:17
Case: 1:20-cv-04813 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/17/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:18
Case: 1:20-cv-04813 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 08/17/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:19
Case: 1:20-cr-00495 Document #: 12 Filed: 09/16/20 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:25
Case: 1:20-cr-00495 Document #: 12 Filed: 09/16/20 Page 2 of 18 PageID #:26
Case: 1:20-cr-00495 Document #: 12 Filed: 09/16/20 Page 3 of 18 PageID #:27
Case: 1:20-cr-00495 Document #: 12 Filed: 09/16/20 Page 4 of 18 PageID #:28
Case: 1:20-cr-00495 Document #: 12 Filed: 09/16/20 Page 5 of 18 PageID #:29
Case: 1:20-cr-00495 Document #: 12 Filed: 09/16/20 Page 6 of 18 PageID #:30
Case: 1:20-cr-00495 Document #: 12 Filed: 09/16/20 Page 7 of 18 PageID #:31
Case: 1:20-cr-00495 Document #: 12 Filed: 09/16/20 Page 8 of 18 PageID #:32
Case: 1:20-cr-00495 Document #: 12 Filed: 09/16/20 Page 9 of 18 PageID #:33
Case: 1:20-cr-00495 Document #: 12 Filed: 09/16/20 Page 10 of 18 PageID #:34
Case: 1:20-cr-00495 Document #: 12 Filed: 09/16/20 Page 11 of 18 PageID #:35
Case: 1:20-cr-00495 Document #: 12 Filed: 09/16/20 Page 12 of 18 PageID #:36
Case: 1:20-cr-00495 Document #: 12 Filed: 09/16/20 Page 13 of 18 PageID #:37
Case: 1:20-cr-00495 Document #: 12 Filed: 09/16/20 Page 14 of 18 PageID #:38
Case: 1:20-cr-00495 Document #: 12 Filed: 09/16/20 Page 15 of 18 PageID #:39
Case: 1:20-cr-00495 Document #: 12 Filed: 09/16/20 Page 16 of 18 PageID #:40
Case: 1:20-cr-00495 Document #: 12 Filed: 09/16/20 Page 17 of 18 PageID #:41
Case: 1:20-cr-00495 Document #: 12 Filed: 09/16/20 Page 18 of 18 PageID #:42
Exhibit 99.1        Officer's Certificate regarding Annual Statement of
                    Compliance of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.

                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

The undersigned officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies on behalf of the Company
and on his own behalf for purposes of the WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2004-AR5, as follows:

1. I am a duly appointed and qualified First Vice President of the Company.

2. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement related to the
above-referenced series of Certificates.

3. I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate on
behalf of the Company.

4. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and performance under this Agreement has been made under my
supervision.

5. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 29, 2005.





                   WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.


                     By: /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                         -------------------------------------
                         Thomas G. Lehmann
                         First Vice President
Exhibit 13.2

eLong, Inc.

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

In connection with the
Annual Report of eLong, Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chris Chan, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition of the Company as of December 31, 2006 and results of operations of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006.



/s/ Chris ChanName:

Chris ChanTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

June 29, 2007
##### 



Exhibit 99.2 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCEPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 5 (the Trust) I, Nancy H. Forte, a duly elected and acting officer of Citibank, N.A. (Indenture Trustee),
do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that: 1. I have reviewed and examined the performance by the Indenture Trustee of the application of
trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section
6.06 of the Indenture pursuant to which the Trusts notes were issued during the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2004 (the Relevant Year); and 2. Based upon my review and examination described in 1 above, and except as provided in the
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance, dated March 15, 2005,
prepared by the Ernst & Young LLP substantially in accordance with Section 4.05 of the Expense and
Indemnity Agreement, to the best of my knowledge, the application of trust money collected by the
Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the Indenture was
performed in accordance with the terms of the Indenture throughout the Relevant Year. CITIBANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee By:
    /s/ Nancy H. ForteName:
    Nancy H. ForteTitle:
    Assistant Vice President Date: March 29, 2005
Case: 1:20-cv-04545 Document #: 124-18 Filed: 06/15/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:2941

Case: 1:20-cv-04545 Document #: 124-18 Filed: 06/15/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:2942

Case: 1:20-cv-04545 Document #: 124-18 Filed: 06/15/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:2943

- AFFIDAVIT OF JENNY ZAMBRANA
- Erickson & Oppenheimer, LTD