alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America

v.

Larry Jones (1)

Case Number: 20 CR 309-1

Magistrate Judge Beth W. Jantz

ORDER

Initial appearance proceedings held. By agreement and consent of all the parties and pursuant to 

the CARES Act, all parties appear by teleconference. Defendant appears in response to arrest on 

06/25/2020. Defendant informed of his rights. Attorney Robert Loeb is granted leave to appear 

on behalf of defendant. Defendant informed of the charges against him as well as of the possible 

sentence/fine if convicted of those charges. The Government’s oral motion for pretrial detention 

is entered and continued. Detention hearing set for 06/30/2020 at 3:00 p.m. Members of the 

public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. The call-in number is (888) 273-

3658 and the access code is 2217918. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are 

reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of 

court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of 

court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future 

hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. 

Arraignment proceedings held. Defendant acknowledges receipt of the Indictment; waives 

formal reading of the Indictment and enters a plea of not guilty to each count in which is named. 

Rule 16.1 (a) conference to be held by 07/02/2020. Pretrial motions to be filed by 07/16/2020. 

Response to be filed by 07/30/2020. Reply to be filed by 08/06/2020. Status hearing before 

Judge Kendall set for 08/20/2020 at 1:30 p.m. In the interest of justice, time is excluded from 

06/25/2020 to and including 08/20/2020 pursuant to 18 USC 3161(h)(7). 

Defendant is hereby remanded into the custody of the United States Marshals Service and shall 

remain in custody until further order of the Court.

(00:30)

Date: 06/25/2020

Beth W. Jantz

United States Magistrate Judge
#### WILMINGTON STAR-NEWS v. NEW HANOVER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER

No. 54PA97

Case below: 125 N.C.App. 174

Petition by respondent (New Hanover Regional) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 8 May 1997. Petition by third party respondent (PHP, Inc.) for writ of supersedeas allowed 8 May 1997. Petition by third party respondent (PHP, Inc.) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 8 May 1997.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT (23)


                                   CONSENT OF
                         INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


         As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation of our report dated February 19, 1998 included or incorporated by
reference in this annual report on Form 10-K, into the Company's previously
filed: Form S-8 Registration Statement File Number 333-44471 and Form S-3
Registration Statement File Number 333-13929.

                                                    /s/ MARGOLIS & COMPANY P.C.
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Margolis & Company P.C.
                                                    Certified Public Accountants


Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania
April 13, 1998
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 20113 Summary Calendar

DONALD L. BLOOM , Plaintiff

- Appellant

v. MEMORIAL HERMANN HOSPITAL SYSTEM; MEMORIAL HERMANN MEMORIAL CITY HOSPITAL , Defendant s
- Appellee s

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:14

- CV

- 3380

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Donald L. Bloom filed a civil action against Memorial Hermann Hospital System and Memorial Hermann Memorial City Hospital (collectively r eferred to herein as Memorial Hermann Health System )

. 1 In this court, Bloom appeals

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances se t forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

1 Memorial Hermann Health System is incorrectly identified in case filings and the caption as Memorial Hermann Hospital System , Memorial Hermann Memorial City Hospital , and Memorial Hermann Hospital System et al. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 3, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-20113 Document: 00513532639 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/03/2016No. 15

- 20113

2 the district court’s denial of his motion for a default judgment and the dismissal of his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction

. We review a district court’s denial of a motion for a default judgment for abuse of discretion

. See Lewis v. Lynn , 236 F.3d 766, 767 (5th Cir. 2001)

. Here, Bloom asserts that he was entitled to a default judgment because Memorial Hermann Health System filed its fi rst responsive pleading one day late. However, e ven in the face of a technical default, such as when a party files its first responsive pleading late, a movant is not entitled to a default judgment as a matter of right. See Ganther v. Ingle , 75 F.3d 207, 212 (5th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, w e cannot say that t he district court abused its discretion in determining that a default judgment was un warranted. See Lewis , 236 F.3d
at 767 ; Sun Bank of Ocala v. Pelican Homestead and Sav

. Ass’n , 874 F.2d 274,
276 (5th Cir. 1989). Regarding Bloom’s second claim, we conduct a de novo review of a district court’s dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Randall D. Wolcott, M.D., P.A. v. Sebelius , 635 F.3d 757, 762 (5th Cir. 2011). “A case is properly dismi ssed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction when the court lacks the statutory or constitutional power to adjudicate the case.” Hooks v. Landmark Indus

. , I nc . 797 F.3d 309, 312 (5th Cir. 2015) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

. Bloom has n ot met his burden of identifying a statutory or constitutional provision giving the district court authority to adjudicate his

case. See id. ; Wolcott, 635 F.3d at 762

. Thus, he has shown no error in the dismiss al of his action for want of jurisdiction. AFFIRMED. Case: 15-20113 Document: 00513532639 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/03/2016
Case: 1:20-cr-00443 Document #: 55 Filed: 07/22/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:139
Case: 1:20-cr-00443 Document #: 55 Filed: 07/22/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:140
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOUND ON
PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S Q3 FORM 10Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          50,074
<SECURITIES>                                   121,970
<RECEIVABLES>                                  118,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,645
<INVENTORY>                                     51,631
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               362,970
<PP&E>                                          98,707
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,695
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 439,623
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           86,970
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       124,164
<OTHER-SE>                                     228,489
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   439,623
<SALES>                                        357,129
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               357,129
<CGS>                                          151,130
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  151,130
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                93,366
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 254
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                118,695
<INCOME-TAX>                                    41,544
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             77,151
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    77,151
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.68
        

</TABLE>
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Travis Lamb v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00901

- CR

Trial court case number: 1394200

Trial court: 351st District Court of Harris County

The motion for rehearing is DENIED

. The motion to publish is DENIED. It is so

ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Brown.

Date: November 2 4 , 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                  11,253,380
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                           10,664,310
<ALLOWANCES>                              (280,293)
<INVENTORY>                             12,210,749
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        36,067,260
<PP&E>                                  26,553,311
<DEPRECIATION>                         (12,765,715)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          57,984,240
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   11,267,545
<BONDS>                                  3,684,011
<COMMON>                                   713,862
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                              43,126,967
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            57,984,240
<SALES>                                 62,387,870
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        62,387,870
<CGS>                                   39,802,965
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           51,692,274
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         325,718
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         11,666,363
<INCOME-TAX>                             4,549,882
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      7,116,481
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                             7,116,481
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 1.00
        



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                                                                     PAGE 1 OF 1

                              THOMAS GROUP, INC.
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        JURISDICTION OF 
           SUBSIDIARY                                    INCORPORATION
----------------------------------                   ---------------------
 <S>                                                       <C>
        Thomas Group GmbH                                    Germany
 Thomas Group (Switzerland) GmbH                           Switzerland
 Thomas Group of Louisiana, Inc.                            Delaware
    Thomas Group Information              
       Technologies, Inc.                                   Delaware
   Thomas Group Asia Pte. Ltd.                              Singapore
  Thomas Group of Sweden, Inc.                              Delaware
</TABLE>
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

JULIA ROSSI, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CLAIRE’S STORES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 1:20-cv-5090

Hon. Andrea R. Wood, presiding

Hon. Magistrate Heather K. McShain

PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION 

SETTLEMENT AND CERTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT CLASS

Plaintiffs Julia Rossi, Delilah Parker, and Kevin Holmes (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), 

individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, by and through their undersigned 

counsel, hereby move without opposition for final approval of the class action settlement as well 

as certification of the proposed settlement class. In support of the instant motion, Plaintiffs 

incorporate the concurrently filed memorandum of law, the Joint Declaration of Bradley K. King 

and M. Anderson Berry, the Declaration of Teresa Y. Sutor, and accompanying exhibits.

Respectfully Submitted,

Dated: September 6, 2022 /s/ Bradley K. King

Tina Wolfson

twolfson@ahdootwolfson.com

Bradley K. King

bking@ahdootwolfson.com

AHDOOT & WOLFSON, PC

2600 West Olive Avenue, Suite 500

Burbank, California 91505

Case: 1:20-cv-05090 Document #: 55 Filed: 09/06/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:650
2

Tel: (310) 474-9111

Fax: (310) 474-8585

Co-Lead Class Counsel

M. Anderson Berry

aberry@justice4you.com

CLAYEO C. ARNOLD, 

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORP.

865 Howe Avenue

Sacramento, California 95825 

Tel: (916) 239-4778

Fax: (916) 924-1829

Co-Lead Class Counsel

Rachele R. Byrd

byrd@whafh.com

WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER 

FREEMAN & HERZ LLP

750 B Street, Suite 1820

San Diego, CA 92101

Tel: (619) 239-4599

Fax: (619) 234-4599

Carl V. Malmstrom

malmstrom@whafh.com 

WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER 

FREEMAN & HERZ LLC 

111 W. Jackson Blvd., 

Suite 1700 Chicago, Illinois 60604 

Tel: 312/984-0000 

Fax: 212/545-4653

Katrina Carroll

katrina@lcllp.com

Kyle A. Shamberg

kyle@lcllp.com

LYNCH CARPENTER LLP

111 West Washington Street, Suite 1240

Chicago, Illinois 60602

Tel: (312) 750-1265

Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class

Case: 1:20-cv-05090 Document #: 55 Filed: 09/06/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:651
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on September 6, 2022, the foregoing Unopposed Motion for Final

Approval of Class Action Settlement and Certification of Settlement Class, with supporting 

documents, was electronically filed with the Clerk of the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of Illinois, using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of the filing 

to all attorneys of record.

/s/ Bradley K. King

Bradley K. King

Case: 1:20-cv-05090 Document #: 55 Filed: 09/06/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:652
| Name of Company                                                    |   | Organized UnderLaws of |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                                                                         |   |                             |
| Domestic:                                                                    |   |                             |
| Symmetry Medical USA, Inc.                                         |   | Delaware                         |
| Symmetry Medical International, Inc.                               |   | Delaware                         |
| Mettis Group, Inc.                                                 |   | Delaware                         |
| Ultrexx, Inc.                                                           |   | Indiana                          |
| Jet Engineering, Inc.                                                   |   | Michigan                         |
| Specialty Surgical Instrumentation, Inc. (d/b/a SSI, Inc.)         |   | Tennessee                        |
| Symmetry Medical SSI Real Estate, LLC                                   |   | Tennessee                        |
|                                                                         |   |                             |
| SMA Real Estate, LLC                                                    |   | Maine                            |
| Symmetry Medical Everest, LLC                                           |   | Delaware                         |
| Symmetry Medical New Bedford, Inc. (f/k/a TNCO, Inc.)                        |   | Massachusetts                    |
| Symmetry New Bedford Real Estate, LLC                                   |   | Delaware                         |
|                                                                         |   |                             |
| International:                                                               |   |                             |
| Symmetry Medical Cheltenham, Limited (f/k/a Othy Limited)                    |   | England                          |
| Poly-Vac France S.A.R.L.                                      |   | France                           |
| Symmetry Medical Poly-Vac S.A.S. (f/k/a Poly-Vac S.A.)             |   | France                           |
| Symmetry Medical Sheffield LTD (f/k/a Thornton Precision Components Limited) |   | England                          |
| Everest Metal International, Ltd.                                  |   | Ireland                          |
| Whedon, Limited                                                              |   | England                          |
| Clamonta, Limited                                                            |   | England                          |
| Symmetry Medical Switzerland SA (f/k/a Riley Medical Europe S.A.)  |   | Switzerland                      |
| Symmetry Medical Malaysia, SDN                                               |   | Malaysia                         |
| Introfocus, Limited                                                          |   |  England                    |

----
2012 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

11-15-2012

Secretary US;Department of Lab v. Altor Inc

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 11-4077

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2012

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2012 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Secretary US;Department of Lab v. Altor Inc" (2012). 2012 Decisions. Paper 162.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2012/162
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

September 13, 2012

No. 11-4077

Secretary United States Department of Labor

v.

Nicholas Saites, et al.

(OSHRC No. 99-0958)

Present: FUENTES, HARDIMAN and ROTH, Circuit Judges

1. Motion by Petitioner Secretary Department of labor to clarify 

 opinion dated 8/31/12

2. Response by Altor Inc., Avcon Inc, Nicholas Saites and 

Vasilios Saites

3. Reply by Petitioner.

Respectfully,

Clerk/tyw

_________________________________ORDER________________________________

The foregoing motion for clarification is granted. As the opinion and judgment issued on 

August 31, 2012 addressed the issues raised in the petition for review and not the issues 

raised in the application for summary enforcement the inclusion of docket number 11-

4077 on the opinion was in error. An amended opinion and judgment will be issued 

listing only docket number 11-2718. As the removal of docket number 11-4077 does not 

alter the substance of the opinion or judgment, the filing date of the opinion and judgment 

will remain unchanged.

The response by Altro Inc., Avcon Inc, Nicholas Saites and Vasilios Saites in opposition 

to the motion for clarification shall be deemed their response to the application for 

summary enforcement. The application for summary enforcement is hereby granted. A 

decree enforcing a final order of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission 

shall be entered.

By the Court,

Circuit Judge

/s/ Julio M. Fuentes

Dated: November 15, 2012

tyw/cc: Heather R. Phillips, Esq.

John R. Shortall, Esq.

Kevin J. O’Connor, Esq.
001

OFFICIAL BALLOT

GENERAL ELECTION

B

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY

November 3, 1998

This ballot stub shall be removed
and retained by the voter.

MARK YOUR CHOICE(S)

INTHISMANNERONLY: [FEI | 09142

Insurance Commissi Vote for One

BARBARA BOUR , Natural Law,
Businesswoman/

DIANE MARTINEZ, D

California State Lawmaker...

GARY R. RAMOS, Peace a ==

Private Investigator

Member, "Siate Board ‘of Equalization
2nd District Vote for One

DEAN AY IDAL, Republican
Memb eatate: Board of Equalization, District 2

TOM Y. SANTOS, Sp emoctatic

UNI TED STATES SENATOR

Vote for One

TIMOTHY R. ERICH, Reform
Teacher/School Principal

H. JOSEPH PERRIN SR., American Independent
Researcher

MATT FONG, Republican
California State Treasurer

BRIAN M. REES, Natural Law
Physician

BARBARA BOXER, Democratic
U.S. Senator

TED BROWN, Libertarian
Insurance Adjuster/Investigator

OPHIE C. BELTRAN, Peace and Freedom
Political Union Organizer

42-2038 VOTE BOTH SIDES

ee)


| HAVE VOTED—HAVE YOU?

MARK YOUR CHOICE(S) [aa
IN THIS MANNER ONLY:

UNITED STATE

23rd District for One &

ELTON W. GALLEGLY, R
U.S. Representative

IVE.

DANIEL ‘DAN’ GONZAL ocratic
Businessman/Attorney

a]
|

STAT

18th District te for One

GORDON KLEMM, Repu
Civil Engineer

JACK RAY, Libertarian
Computer Networking Salesman

JACK O’CONNELL, Democratic
Member, California Senate

MEMBER OF THE STATE ASSEMBLY

35th District Vote for One

CHRIS MITCHUM, Republican
Businessman/Producer/Actor

HANNAH-BETH JACKSON, Democratic
Attorney

ERIC DAHL, Natural Law
Business Executive

Vote Yes or No

JUDICIAL for Each Office
For Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
Shall CHIEF JUSTICE RONALD M. GEORGE be | Y°S/-—
elected to the office for the term provided by law? —<
For Associate Justice of the Supreme Court —
Shall ASSOCIATE JUSTICE MING WILLIAM CHIN. | YS/——
be elected to the office for the term provided by law? No

42-2068 VOTE BOTH SIDES

B