alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-25-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-26-2000
<CASH>                                           3,150
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   78,272
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,112
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                83,190
<PP&E>                                          17,833
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,261
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 130,338
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,362
<BONDS>                                         51,243
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           378
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,667
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   130,338
<SALES>                                        417,556
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               417,556
<CGS>                                          370,138
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  370,138
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,901
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,408
<INCOME-TAX>                                       877
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,531
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (897)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,634
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>The Company's equity is not publicly traded.
</FN>


</TABLE>
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3942

AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States

Postal Service located at 7 Commercial Boulevard in Middletown, Rhode Island, as the ‘‘RhodeIsland Veterans Post Office Building’’.

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3942

AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 7 Commercial Boulevard in Middletown,

Rhode Island, as the ‘‘Rhode Island Veterans Post Office

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3942 EH

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 7 Commercial Boulevard in Middletown, Rhode

4 Island, is hereby redesignated as the ‘‘Rhode Island Vet5 erans Post Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Rhode Island Veterans Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives April 27, 2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6506** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
JOSEPH PRYSOCK, a/k/a JoJo , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken

. Margaret B. Seymour, Chief District Judge. ( 1:06

- cr
- 00676

- MBS

- 1 )

Submitted : June 7, 2012 Decided: July 13, 2012

Before KING, WYNN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Joseph Prysock , Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing , Mark C. Moore , Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee

.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this ci rcuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Joseph Prysock appeals the district court ’ s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction

of sentence. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Prysock , No. 1:06

- cr
- 00676

-
MBS

- 1 (D.S.C. Feb. 17, 2012)

. We deny as unnecessary Prysock’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although Prysock argues on appeal that the district court erred in denying his post

- conviction motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2011), we have no authority to entertain this claim. Prysock’s notice of appeal specifically sought rev iew of the district court’s order denying his § 3582(c)(2) motion and, in any event, was not timely as to the lower court’s earlier ruling denying Prysock’s § 2255 motion. Thus, we lack jurisdiction to consider Prysock’s challenge to the denial of § 2255 relief.
#### D. T. Perry *v.*B. F. Cafer.

Principal and Surety — Release of Indemnifying Mortgage.

Where a mortgage becomes released under a judgment, a mortgage . given to indemnify the surety on tbe original understanding also becomes released.

APPEAL FROM LARUE CIRCUIT COURT.

January 21, 1873.

*Winter smith, for appellant.*

*Chelff Brown & Murray, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Hardin :

This case is essentially different from: that of *Hobson, etc., v. Hobson’s Ex’r (8*Bush 665), where the debt to secure which Mrs. Hobson united with her husband in a mortgage of her property, remained unsatisfied; and it was held that the statute of limitation, which would have released a personal surety, did not release the mortgage.

In this case the mortgage of B. F. Cafer and wife was not made to secure' the debt to Richards or Perry, but to indemnify Wesley Cafer in his supposed liability as the surety of B. F. Cafer. If Wesley Qafer’s liability had continued, the indemnifying mortgage might have inured to the benefit of the holder of the debt; but when the mortgage became released under the judgment of the court in consequence of the changing or interpolation of the note, the mortgage given to. secure him against his pre-existing liability also ceased to be obligatory. This was, in effect, decided in the cases of *Hunter v. Richardson,*1 Duvall 248; *Vandiver v. Hodge’s Adm’r,*4 Bush 539, and *Yeates v. Weeden, Adm’r, 6*Bush 438.

Therefore the judgment is *affirmed.*
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3855 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

607 Pershing Drive in Laclede, Missouri, as the ‘‘General John J. 

Pershing Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2004 

Mr. GRAVES (for himself, Mr. HULSHOF, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. AKIN, Mrs. EMERSON, Ms. MCCARTHY of Missouri, Mr. SKELTON, Mr. CLAY, and Mr. 

GEPHARDT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 607 Pershing Drive in Laclede, Missouri, as 

the ‘‘General John J. Pershing Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 607 Pershing Drive in Laclede, Missouri, shall 

6 be known and designated as the ‘‘General John J. Per7 shing Post Office’’. 
2 

•HR 3855 IH 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the General John J. Pershing Post Office. 

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 608 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 20, 1998.
    Resolved, That a committee of two Members of the House be appointed to wait 
upon the President of the United States and inform him that the House of 
Representatives has completed its business of the session and is ready to 
adjourn, unless the President has some other communication to make to them.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
9976.

#### Scott *et al. v.*Wells *et al.*

Decided May 13, 1919.

Action for damages; from Fulton superior court—Judge Pendleton. June 5, 1918.

*Westmoreland, Anderson & Smith,*for plaintiffs.

*Rosser, Slaton, Phillips & Hopkins, Dodd & Dodd,*for defendants.

Luke, J.

The court overruled some of the grounds of the demurrer to the petition, but sustained others, and allowed the plaintiff ten days in which to amend her petition so as to meet the grounds sustained. To this ruling no exception was taken, nor is error assigned thereon in the bill of exceptions. ,The plaintiff, within the time allowed, filed an amendment to her petition. However, this amendment failed to meet the objections raised by the sustained grounds of the demurrer, and, there being no further effort to amend the petition, these facts authorized the action of the trial judge in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the case. *Albany Phosphate Co.*v. *Hugger,*4 *Ga. App.*775 (62 S. E. *533); Cowart*v. *Powell, 5 Ga. App.*43 (62 S. E. 664); *Central Railway Co.*v. *Waldo,*6 *Ga. App.*840 (65 S. E. 1098) ; *John Church Co.*v. *Ætna Indemnity Co.,*13 *Ga. App.*827 (80 S. E. 1093) ; *Hinson*v. *Mutual Fertilizer Co.,*19 *Ga. App.*121 (91 S. E. 241) ; *Baker*v. *City of Atlanta,*22 *Ga. App.*483 (96 S. E. 332).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3908 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3908

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
To provide for the conveyance of the real property located at 1081 West 
                      Main Street in Ravenna, Ohio.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE.

    The Secretary of Labor shall convey, without charge or 
consideration, to Portage County, Ohio, all right, title, and interest 
of the United States (including all Federal equity) in and to the 
parcel of real property located at 1081 West Main Street in Ravenna, 
Ohio, to the extent such right, title, or interest was acquired through 
grants to the State of Ohio under title III of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 501 et seq.) or the Wagner-Peyser Act (29 U.S.C. 49 et seq.) 
or through funds distributed to the State of Ohio under section 903 of 
the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1103).

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3942 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 568
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3942

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 28, 2004

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

                              June 7, 2004

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 7 Commercial Boulevard in Middletown, Rhode Island, as the ``Rhode 
                Island Veterans Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 7 
Commercial Boulevard in Middletown, Rhode Island, is hereby 
redesignated as the ``Rhode Island Veterans Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Rhode Island Veterans Post 
Office Building''.

                                                       Calendar No. 568

108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3942

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 7 Commercial Boulevard in Middletown, Rhode Island, as the ``Rhode 
                Island Veterans Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 7, 2004

                       Reported without amendment
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

ZHU ZHAI HOLDINGS LIMITED and )

PETER PUI TAK LEE, )

) Case No. 20-cv-04985

Plaintiffs/Judgement Creditors, )

) Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman

v. )

) Hon Sidney I. Schenkier (Ret.),

STEVEN IVANKOVICH, ) Special Master

)

Defendant/Judgement Debtor. )

SPECIAL MASTER’S ORDER NO. 6

On July 11, 2024, plaintiffs filed a motion to compel and for sanctions (doc. # 319) based 

on a failure to provide them with EIN numbers for certain accounts pursuant to Paragraph 1 of 

Special Master’s Order No. 5 (doc. # 318). By July 16, 2024, the defendant/judgment debtor and 

the Third Party LLCs each shall file a response to the motion, not to exceed three pages each. No 

replies shall be filed. Upon reviewing the motion and responses, the Special Master will determine 

whether to conduct a hearing on the motion or instead to rule in writing.

___________________________________

HON. SIDNEY I. SCHENKIER (RET.)

Special Master

July 12, 2024

Case: 1:20-cv-04985 Document #: 320 Filed: 07/12/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:3938
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3990

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to extend 

contracts for national dairy market loss payments through fiscal year 2007. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2004

Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota (for himself, Mr. SHERWOOD, Mr. OBEY, Mr. 

SENSENBRENNER, Mr. KIND, Mr. PETERSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. 

OBERSTAR, Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin, Ms. BALDWIN, and Mr. RYAN of 

Wisconsin) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act 

of 2002 to extend contracts for national dairy market 

loss payments through fiscal year 2007.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CONTRACTS FOR NATIONAL 

4 DAIRY MARKET LOSS PAYMENTS. 

5 Section 1502 of the Farm Security and Rural Invest6 ment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 7982) is amended in sub-
2

•HR 3990 IH 

1 sections (f) and (g)(1) by striking ‘‘September 30, 2005’’ 

2 and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2007’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4055 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4055

                     For the relief of Amina Silmi.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2004

 Mr. Kucinich introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                     For the relief of Amina Silmi.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR AMINA SILMI.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Amina Silmi shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Amina Silmi enters the United States 
before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), she shall be 
considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Amina Silmi, the Secretary of 
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, 
if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the alien's birth under section 
202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Amina Silmi 
shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, 
privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, the undersigned  officer of ING USA Annuity
and Life  Insurance  Company  (the  "Company")  hereby  certifies  that,  to the
officer's knowledge, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d),  as applicable,  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and that  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                      By:/s/ David A. Wheat
November 12, 2004                        ---------------------------------------
-----------------                            David A. Wheat
      (Date)                                 Director, Senior Vice President and
                                               Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of American Power Conversion Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending June 27, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald M. Muir,Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration, and Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)      The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)      The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Donald  M. Muir                                 |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Donald M.  Muir                                     |
| Senior Vice  President, Finance and Administration, |
| and Chief  Financial Officer                        |

 

August 6, 2004

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separatedisclosure document.

 

1

----
#### Stephen L. MCMANAWAY, Claimant-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 03-7063.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 20, 2004.

ORDER

Pursuant to the Court’s letter dated September 23, 2004,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

This appeal is dismissed.
Importance of Validation for Wastewater Surveillance

DHS/NIST SWWS Workshop, June 15th 2021

Brian Swalla, PhD brian-swalla@idexx.com
2 © 2021 IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. All rights reserved.

Shifting from method development to routine monitoring 

requires a change in focus

Method Development

o Experimentation 

o Speed (especially in a pandemic)

o Agility (ability to quickly evaluate changes)

o Proof-of-concept

Routine Monitoring

o Stability 

o Consistency and repeatability

o Record keeping 

o Quality controls and SOPs

o Standardized training 
3 © 2020 IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. All rights reserved.

IDEXX has generated validation data that supports routine 

monitoring with high-quality data Method:

o PEG concentration protocol

o IDEXX Magnetic Bead Kit

o IDEXX SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 

Test Kit

Validation parameters:

o 100+ samples

o 15+ different wastewater 

treatment facilities

• Geographically diverse

o Independent test dates

o Multiple analysts

o Different material & reagent lots

o Varied lab equipment

Repeatability of Full Test Method*

* Please contact IDEXX Water Technical Support for more 

information or a copy of the full validation report
4 © 2021 IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. All rights reserved.

The Houston Health Department (HHD) demonstrated the 

consistency of a validated test Adoption of a validated test 

provided:

o Higher consistency

o Higher sensitivity

o Accelerated learning curve

o Technical support

o Confidence in results

HHD replicate 1

HHD replicate 2

Partner replicate 1

Partner replicate 2

IDEXX is green

Please project (don’t print) this presentation.