alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Jeffery W.Sprick, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mueller Water Products, LLC;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period(s) covered by this report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)         [Reserved]

(c)          Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(d)         Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)         Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: December 19,2005

|        | /s/ JEFFERY W.  SPRICK           |
|--------|----------------------------------|
|   | Name: Jeffery W.  Sprick         |
|   | Title: *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
Handbook 44 – 2009 2008 Amendments 

2008 Amendments

The following table lists the codes, paragraphs, and pages in which the 93rd National Conference on Weights and Measures 

made amendments. In the column headed “Action,” changes are noted as “added,” “amended,” “deleted,” or “renumbered.” 

Each code, section, or paragraph that has been changed will be noted as “Added 2008” or “Amended 2008.”

SECTION CODE S&T 

ITEM NO. PARAGRAPH ACTION PAGE 

1.10 General 310-3 G-A.1. Amended 1-1 

320-1 S.1.1.1. Amended 2-3 

S.1.2.1. Amended 2-4 

320-2 S.2.3. Amended 2-11 

T.N.2.1. Amended 2-31 

320-4 S.2.1.5. Amended 2-10 

2.20 Scales 

320-5 S.2.4., S.2.4.1. Amended 2-11, 2-12 

321-1 N.2.3. Amended 2-52 2.21 

Belt-Conveyor 

Scale Systems 

321-2 UR.2.2.(n) Amended 2-56 

S.1.2. Amended 2-70 

S.2.2. Amended 2-72 2.24 Automatic 

Weighing Systems 324-1 

T.2.1. Amended 2-78 

3.31 Vehicle-Tank 

Meters 331-1 S.5.7. Added 3-31 

3.36 Water Meters 335-1 UR.2 Added 3-79 

A.1.(a), A.1.(b) Added 5-53 

358-1 

Table S.4.1.b., Note 7 Amended 5-58 

S.1.5.2. Added 5-54 

358-2 

UR.3.3. Added 5-61 

358-3 N.1.2.1. Added 5-58 

5.58 Multiple Dimension 

Measuring Devices 

358-4 N.1.4.2., N.1.4.3. Added 5-59 

 vii 
2007 Amendments Handbook 44 – 2009 

2008 Amendments

equipment, commercial Added D-7 

310-3 

commercial equipment Added D-4 

hexahedron Added D-9 

Appendix 

D Definitions 

358-1 

irregularly shaped object Added D-10 

viii 
Handbook 44 – 2009 2008 Amendments 

2008 Editorial Changes 

SECTION CODE PARAGRAPH ACTION PAGE

1.10 General G-UR.4.1. Added a parenthetical to refer to Introduction, Section Q 

which explains the focus of “User Requirements.” 1-9 

2.20 Scales Table T.1.1. Changed “after” to “as of” in the reference to the date in 

Footnote 4. 2-29 

2.21 Belt-Conveyor 

Scale Systems N.3.2. Repeated in part (d) the “note” that currently follows part (e) 

regarding the accuracy of the reference scale. 2-54 

3.30 

LiquidMeasuring 

Devices 

UR.3.4. Added “by the device” following “...either printed” to 

clarify the intent of the term “printed” in this instance. 3-20 

Table S.1.6. 

Deleted reference to “hexahedron” and corresponding 

asterisks since a definition for the term has been added in 

conjunction with S&T Item 358-1. 

5-55 

5.58 

Multiple 

Dimension 

Measuring 

Devices Table UR.5. Deleted reference to “hexahedron” since a definition for the 

term has been added in conjunction with S&T Item 358-1. 5-61 

Appendix D Definitions user 

requirement 

Added a parenthetical to refer to Introduction, Section Q 

which explains the focus of “User Requirements.” D-22 

 ix 
2007 Amendments Handbook 44 – 2009 

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 

x
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.01

                     RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS

I, Fabio P. Savoldelli, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of ML Futures Investments L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
   disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
   ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
   consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
   entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
   prepared;

   b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
   procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
   period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
   over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
   fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
   annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
   materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
   reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
   operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely
   affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
   financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
   over financial reporting.

Date: May 16, 2005
------------------

By /s/ FABIO P. SAVOLDELLI
   -----------------------
Fabio P. Savoldelli
Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer
- Alternative Strategies Advisers Division
(Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit32**

 

**TIME AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Time America, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Thomas S. Bednarik, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Craig J. Smith, Vice President — Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| By:    | /s/ Thomas S. Bednarik                                                       |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Thomas S. Bednarik                                                           |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer                                        |
|   | November 15, 2004                                                            |
|   |                                                                         |
| By:    | /s/ Craig J. Smith                                                           |   |
|   | Craig J. Smith                                                               |
|   | Vice President — Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | November 15, 2004                                                            |
GLP 11 – 2019 Page 1 of 1

This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.6969-201

9

GLP 11 

Good Laboratory Practice

for

Painting Cast Iron Weights

Large cast iron or steel weights should be painted both for their protection and to preserve their 

mass integrity. Unprotected weights are subject to corrosion. Furthermore, when corrosion is 

present, the extent and any changes resulting from it may be difficult to estimate. 

Thin even coats of aluminum paint are recommended for this purpose. Spray applications are best 

if large weights or many small weights are to be painted. In preparation for painting, a weight 

should be cleaned, and loose scale should be removed using a wire brush (DO NOT remove old 

paint and corrosion by means of sand blasting or pressure washing. Severe damage may result.). 

The painting should be done before the weights are calibrated, unless arrangements are made to 

obtain "as found" values. If “as found” values are desired, two calibrations may be required (one 

before painting as the “as found” values and one after painting and after any adjustments as the 

“as left” values). 

Painting should be done in an area reserved for this purpose, or at least in a place which is removed 

from laboratory measurement operations. Painting operations must follow applicable safety 

standards with appropriate Safety Data Sheets available and using appropriate Personal Protective 

Equipment (PPE). The weights should be protected from dust or dirt contamination while the 

coating is drying.
This page is intentionally blank. 

This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.6969-2019
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00216-CR

EZEKIEL GABRIEL WIGGINS APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 89TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 51,027-C

------------

ORDER

------------

Appellant Ezekiel Gabriel Wiggins appeals from his conviction for 

indecency with a child by contact. Court-appointed counsel for Appellant filed a 

brief with an attached appendix on May 5, 2014. We notified counsel the next 

day that the appendix contained unredacted references to the minor victim and 

directed counsel to file an amended appendix, redacting the minor’s identifying 

information, no later than May 16, 2014. See 2nd Tex. App. (Fort Worth) Loc. R. 

7. Counsel failed to comply, and we again directed counsel to file an amended 

appendix no later than June 2, 2014. As of the date of this order, counsel has 
2

complied with neither directive. Accordingly, we ORDER counsel for the third 

time to file an amended appendix that redacts any identifying information of the 

minor victim no later than July 11, 2014. If counsel again fails to comply, we will 

abate this appeal and remand to the trial court for appropriate action, including 

possible contempt proceedings against counsel. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b).

The clerk of this court is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the 

attorneys of record.

DATED June 30, 2014.

PER CURIAM
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4041

To waive, in fiscal year 2004, the numerical limitation applicable to a nonimmigrant described in section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) of the Immigration 

and Nationality Act, if the employer petitioning on behalf of the nonimmigrant employed such a nonimmigrant in fiscal year 2003, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 25, 2004

Mr. GOODLATTE (for himself, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. SIMMONS, 

Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. CANNON, 

and Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To waive, in fiscal year 2004, the numerical limitation applicable to a nonimmigrant described in section 

101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality 

Act, if the employer petitioning on behalf of the nonimmigrant employed such a nonimmigrant in fiscal year 

2003, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4041 IH 

1 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF NUMERICAL LIMITATION FOR CER2 TAIN H2B NONIMMIGRANTS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 

4 214(g)(1)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

5 U.S.C. 1184(g)(1)(B)), the numerical limitation contained 

6 in such section shall not apply, in fiscal year 2004, to an 

7 alien for whom an employer described in subsection (b) 

8 files a petition described in section 214(c)(1) of such Act 

9 (8 U.S.C. 1184(c)(1)). 

10 (b) EMPLOYERS DESCRIBED.—An employer de11 scribed in this subsection is an employer who lawfully em12 ployed, in fiscal year 2003, a nonimmigrant described in 

13 section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) of the Immigration and Na14 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b)). 

15 (c) LIMITATION.—Subsection (a) shall cease to apply 

16 to an alien when the number of petitions under section 

17 214(c)(1) of such Act approved in fiscal year 2004 for 

18 the employer petitioning for such alien, with respect to the 

19 importation of aliens as nonimmigrants under section 

20 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) of such Act, exceeds the number of 

21 such nonimmigrants lawfully employed by the employer in 

22 fiscal year 2003.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose Manuel RAMIREZ-ANGELES, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-50237.

D.C. No. CR-03-02922-BTM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 6, 2004.*

Decided Dec. 13, 2004.

Steven E. Stone, Asst. U.S. Atty, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Norma A. Aguilar, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GOODWIN, WALLACE and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Jose Manuel Ramirez-Angeles appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea for being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. *582Pursuant to *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and *Blakely v. Washington,*— U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), Ramirez-Angeles contends that the district court erred in enhancing his sentence based upon facts that were not alleged in the indictment, proven beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury nor admitted by the defendant. The sole basis for the sentencing enhancement was Ramirez-Angeles’s prior “crime of violence” conviction, and his contention is foreclosed by our recent decision in *United States v. Quintana-Quintana,*383 F.3d 1052, 1052-53 (9th Cir.2004).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7726

MICHAEL EDWARD FULCHER, Petitioner - Appellant, versusD. A. BRAXTON, Warden, Department of Corrections Buckingham Correctional Center; MARK L. EARLY, Respondents - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-00-468) Submitted: April 10, 2001 Decided: April 24, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mary Burnett Hatch, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. VirginiaBidwell Theisen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Michael Edward Fulcher seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record andthe district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Fulcher v. Braxton , No. CA-00-468 (W.D. Va. Nov. 2, 2000). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.4

               SECOND AMENDMENT TO REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT
               ----------------------------------------------

          This Second Amendment (the "Second Amendment") to the Revolving
Credit Agreement between CommScope Optical Technologies, Inc., a Delaware
corporation ("CommScope Optical") and OFS BrightWave, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company (the "Borrower") is entered into as of June 14,
2004.

                                 WITNESSETH

          WHEREAS, CommScope Optical and the Borrower are parties to the
Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of November 16, 2001 (as amended by the
First Amendment, dated October 9, 2002, the "Credit Agreement") pursuant to
which CommScope Optical has agreed to extend, and has extended, a credit
facility to the Borrower.

          WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend the Credit Agreement in
certain respects to reflect the agreement of the parties.

          NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual
considerations contained herein, the parties hereto hereby agree as
follows:

          Section 1. Definitions. All capitalized terms used and not
defined herein shall have the meanings given thereto in the Credit
Agreement.

          Section 2. Amendments to the Credit Agreement. The Credit
Agreement is hereby amended to delete Section 3.2 in its entirety.

          Section 3. Limited Amendment. Except as otherwise amended hereby,
the Credit Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

          Section 4. Counterparts. This Second Amendment may be executed in
any number of multiple counterparts, all of which shall together constitute
but one and the same original.

          Section 5. Effectiveness. This Second Amendment shall be
effective as of the date that Commscope Optical completes the transactions
contemplated by Section 5.6 of the Amended and Restated Memorandum of
Understanding, dated as of November 15, 2001, as amended by Amendments Nos.
1 and 2, by and between The Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd., a corporation
organized under the laws of Japan, and CommScope Optical (as assignee of
CommScope, Inc., a Delaware corporation).


<PAGE>


          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their duly
authorized officers to execute and deliver this Second Amendment as of the
date first above written.

                                          OFS BRIGHTWAVE, LLC

                                          By: /s/ Kiyoshi Takeuchi
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Name: Kiyoshi Takeuchi
                                              Title: Chairman/CEO

                                          COMMSCOPE OPTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


                                          By: /s/ Jearld L. Leonhardt
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Name: Jearld L. Leonhardt
                                              Title: Vice President





                                     2
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-3435

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Terrell Simpson

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

 Submitted: May 6, 2015

Filed: May 17, 2016 

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, ARNOLD, SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Terrell Simpson challenges the district court’s1

 finding that he violated the

conditions of his supervised release and argues that the district court abused its

1

The Honorable Greg Kays, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the

Western District of Missouri.
discretion in sentencing him to two years in prison. Additionally, his counsel has

moved to withdraw. We conclude that the district court did not clearly err in its

factual findings, or abuse its discretion in sentencing Simpson. See United States v.

Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 914-917 (8th Cir. 2009) (standards of review); United States v.

Meyer, 483 F.3d 865, 869 (8th Cir. 2007) (discussing reliability of sweat-patch

results).

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm the

judgment of the district court.

______________________________

-2-