alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

D'Andre Bradley, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04270

Honorable Ronald A. Guzman

Brendan F. Kelly, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, October 5, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman: The motion to intervene

[20] is entered and continued, and the 10/6/2020 motion hearing is stricken. The movants'

request for an express ruling is denied. Mailed notice. (kp, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04270 Document #: 28 Filed: 10/05/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:109
C.S., FATHER OF L.M.K., 

MINOR CHILD,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN 

AND FAMILIES,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-2184

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 8, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Holmes County.

Christopher N. Patterson, Judge.

Richard Hinds, Panama City, for Appellant.

Sarah J. Rumph, Children's Legal Services, Tallahassee; Laura J. Lee, Guardian ad 

Litem Program, Sanford, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
May 2002 

Update on ASTM Committee F10 Livestock, Meat, and Poultry 

Evaluation Systems 

By: Dick Suiter 

On April 25 and 26, 2002, ASTM held the second meeting of ASTM Committee F10 on 

Livestock, Meat, and Poultry Evaluation Systems at the University of Nebraska in 

Lincoln, NE, with 27 members attending. The F10 Staff Manager, Bruce Noe (ASTM), 

reported that the ballot for changes to the Bylaws resulted in an affirmative vote. F10 

membership has increased to 75 members. 

On the first morning, the Subcommittees initially met as a group, then broke into task 

groups to continue discussion and development of the individual standards for F10.10 

Design Specification, F10.20 Performance Criteria, F10.30 User Requirements, and 

F10.40 Predictive Accuracy. After lunch the task groups met again to discuss common 

and overlapping issues of each Subcommittee’s standard. 

The second day, each Subcommittee presented a report to the entire group on progress 

made by its task group. The F10.10 Subcommittee presented a draft of the design 

specification for comment from the rest of the group. Members of other Subcommittees 

offered comments and suggestions on the F10.10 draft. The F10.10 Subcommittee will 

consider these comments and incorporate them into the draft standard as appropriate. 

F10.10 intends to have a draft specification posted for comment on the ASTM Members 

site in the near future. 

The Executive Committee announced that the next full Committee Meeting is scheduled 

at ASTM Headquarters in Conshohocken, PA, on August 15 and 16, 2002. The 

Subcommittees will continue to work electronically in the interim. 

For additional background on this issue, see the November 2001 issue of the Weights & 

Measures Quarterly. For additional information on F10 or on becoming a Committee 

Member, contact Dick Suiter (NIST) by e-mail at rsuiter@nist.gov or by phone at (301) 

975-4406.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December
      31,
      2007 of the MACROshares Oil Up Holding Trust (the "Registrant"), as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"),
      I, John A. Flanagan, principal financial officer of MACRO Securities Depositor,
      LLC, which acts as the depositor for the Registrant (the "Depositor"), certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
                Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Annual Report fairly represents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
                of the
                Registrant.




March
      28,
      2008




/s/
      John A. Flanagan


John
      A.
      Flanagan


Chief
      Financial Officer
#### Petition of SADIN.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

Aug. 9, 1951.

No appearance for petitioner.

Edward J. Shaughnessy, District Director, New York District, Immigration and Naturalization Service, by Monroe Kroll, U. S. Naturalization Examiner, New York City, for the United States.

NOONAN, District Judge.

The question to be decided in this matter is whether or not an illegitimate child may be naturalized on the petition of her mother pursuant to the provisions of Section 315 of the Nationality Actj 8 U.S.C.A. § 715. It is clear that 'under New York law an illegitimate child is the child of the mother and may inherit -from her. In this matter the designated Examiner has found in favor of granting naturalization to the child in question, whereas the Commissioner has overruled such finding and held that this application should be denied. Counsel for the government stresses that under the language of Section 315, supra, the. child to be naturalized must have *parents,*and that the illegitimate child in this cáse having no father has only one parent, and as such is not entitled to naturalization on the petition of her mother. It is my belief, with all due deference to the findings-of the Commissioner, that the ruling of the designated Examiner is more correct, more sound and complies more fully with the spirit as well as the letter of the law. The language of the statute uses the words: “one of whose parents is at the time of petitioning * * ”. I believe the proper emphasis should be placed on the word “one” rather than on the word “parents”. Inasmuch as the illegitimate child in this case is seeking naturalization on the petition of her mother, I hold that she is eligible for naturalization. I, accordingly, find that Emma Marie Caliger may be naturalized on the petition of her mother under the provisions of Section 315 of the Nationality Act, and I grant the application accordingly.
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-31134

Summary Calendar

ERNEST J. COLONNA, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LARRY G. MASSANARI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 98-CV-771

April 18, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ern est J. Colonna appeals the denial of his claim for

Supplemental Security Income benefits. He asserts that the district

court erred in affirming the Commissione r's denial of his claim.

Colonna contends that (1) the Appeals Council erred by not

remandi ng the cause to the Administrative Law Judge for

consideration of new and material evidence; (2) Colonna is entitled

to reversal because the ALJ did not require the examining1 Colonna v. Apfel , No. 2:98-CV-771 (W.D. La. July 18, 2000)

(unpublished).

2 psychiatrist to submit a mental assessm ent form; and (3) the

Appeals Council improperly relied on the Medical-Vocational

Guidelines to justify the denial of benefits.

After careful review of the record, we AFFIRM based

substantially on the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's

report, which the district court accepted. 1

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Emanuel N. Hilario, Chief Financial Officer, in connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of McCormick & Schmicks Seafood Restaurants, Inc. for the annual period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report), hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of McCormick & Schmicks Seafood Restaurants, Inc.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ EMANUEL N. HILARIO 
|Emanuel N. Hilario     
|Chief Financial Officer
|Dated: March 13, 2006
10003.

#### Exchange Bank of Valdosta *v.*Newton.

Decided June 12, 1919.

Complaint; from city court of Valdosta—Judge Cranford. July -13, 1918.

*Whitaker & Dukes,*for plaintiff.

*E. K. Wilcox, Dan R. Bruce,*for defendant.

Luke, J.

1. Where the creditor, at the time a debt is created, really intends in good faith to extend the credit to the wife and not to the husband, and the consideration of the loan passes legally and morally . from the creditor to the wife, and where the writings then executed are such as purport to bind her for the debt as her own, then, whatever may he the private understanding between the wife and the husband, in which the creditor is not concerned and in which he has no interest, . as to the disposition by the wife .of the proceeds of the loan so received by her, the writings are to be treated as embracing the true substance of the contract. See *Longley*v. *Bank of Parrott,*19 *Ga. App.*701, (92 8. E. 232), and cases there cited.

2. When a lender of money to a married women not only knows that she borrows it to pay a debt of her husband, but aids him in forming and executing a scheme by which the loan is to be made upon security of her property-, he being the real borrower, the debt for the loan is not her debt; and if the debt be that of the husband, the wife cannot assume its payment. It is the purpose of the law to prevent the appropriation of the wife’s property to the payment of a secondary or collateral liability. *Gross*v. *Whitley,*128 *Ga.*79 (57 S. E. 94)., and cases there cited.

*(a)*Upon such a loan being made, the taking by the wife of her husband’s note for the amount of the loan, and subsequent suit thereon by her, will not estop her from pleading the statute in her favor; and this is true even though upon such suit there be ah entry of “settled,” etc.

3. The court did not err in the admission of the evidence complained of. The charge of the court, when read as a whole, was full and fair. The evidence authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge. Eor no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgement affirmed.*

*Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.*
Exhibit
31.2  CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER  I,
Curtis L. Garner, Jr., certify that:  1.I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Otelco Inc.;  2.Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The
registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a.designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b.evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and  c.disclosed
in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a.all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and  b.any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.  Date:   March 31, 2005   /s/ Curtis L. Garner,
  Jr.Curtis
  L. Garner, Jr.Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1097
PATRICIA M. SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HUNT MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Carl Horn III, Chief Magistrate Judge. (CA-94-131-5-H) Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 25, 1997 Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patricia M. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Randel Eugene Phillips, Karin Marie McGinnis, MOORE & VAN ALLEN, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summaryjudgment for the Defendants in her Title VII discrimination and retaliation claims based on race. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Hunt Manufacturing Co. , No. CA-94-131-5-H (W.D.N.C. Nov. 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case: 1:20-cr-00475 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/20 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:10
Case: 1:20-cr-00475 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/20 Page 2 of 9 PageID #:11
Case: 1:20-cr-00475 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/20 Page 3 of 9 PageID #:12
Case: 1:20-cr-00475 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/20 Page 4 of 9 PageID #:13
Case: 1:20-cr-00475 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/20 Page 5 of 9 PageID #:14
Case: 1:20-cr-00475 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/20 Page 6 of 9 PageID #:15
Case: 1:20-cr-00475 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/20 Page 7 of 9 PageID #:16
Case: 1:20-cr-00475 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/20 Page 8 of 9 PageID #:17
Case: 1:20-cr-00475 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/06/20 Page 9 of 9 PageID #:18
#### Hiram *W.*Johnson v. Aurilla E. Johnson. Aurilla E. Johnson v. Hiram *W.*Johnson.

*Divorce*— Delay *in filing cross-Mil.*

A wife’s delay to file a bill for divorce until after her husband has filed one is not of itself a reason for refusing her relief where the husband’s offence has not been forgiven and the parties have lived apart since it was committed.

Appeal from Ingham. (Gridley, J.)

April 5.

April 11.

Divorce. Cross-bills. The wife appeals.

Divorce granted.

*Rollin H. Person*for Hiram *W.*Johnson.

*294
      *Quinoy A. Smith*for Aurilla E. Johnson.

Cooley, J.

These are cross-suits for divorce. The cause assigned in each, bill is adultery. ¥e think-the husband has wholly failed to make out a case, but that the allegations' of the wife are established.

It is suggested, however, that the wife’s complaint should not be listened to with favor, because she was not prompt in making it, and did not file her bill until after he had commenced suit. We-domot agree in this Delay in complaining of family difficulties is to be encouraged rather than punished, in the hope that a better state of things may be established by the voluntary action of the parties. No forgiveness of the offense is pretended in this case, and the parties have been living apart since it was committed. A decree of divorce in the wife’s favor will be entered, and she will have judgment for costs of both cases in this Court,, with a solicitor’s fee of $50 in each.

The other Justices concurred.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

VALENTINO ROSSI, )

) Case No. 20-cv-4746

Plaintiff, ) 

)

) Judge Virginia M. Kendall

v. )

)

THE INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, )

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, )

PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED )

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED )

ON SCHEDULE A HERETO, )

)

Defendants. )

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff VALENTINO ROSSI

hereby dismisses with prejudice all causes of action in the complaint against the following Defendants 

identified in Schedule A. Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs.

No. Defendant 

184 kageden

326 giftfromcompany

The respective Defendants have not filed an answer to the complaint or a motion for summary 

judgment in this matter. Therefore, it is respectfully submitted that dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is 

appropriate.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: October 26, 2020 By: s/Michael A. Hierl _ 

Michael A. Hierl (Bar No. 3128021)

William B. Kalbac (Bar No. 6301771)

Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd.

Three First National Plaza

70 W. Madison Street, Suite 4000

Chicago, Illinois 60602

(312) 580-0100 Telephone

mhierl@hsplegal.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

VALENTINO ROSSI

Case: 1:20-cv-04746 Document #: 36 Filed: 10/26/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:4370
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned attorney hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of 

Voluntary Dismissal was filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court and served on all counsel of 

record and interested parties via the CM/ECF system on October 26, 2020.

s/Michael A. Hierl

Case: 1:20-cv-04746 Document #: 36 Filed: 10/26/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:4371
FOR: WRAP 2024 (Western Regional Assurance Program)

Conference Dates: May 6 to May 9, 2024 (8 AM to 5 PM)

Destination: Aston Waikiki Sunset 

229 Paoakalani Ave

Honolulu, HI 96815

Registration: michael.tang@hawaii.gov (host email) deadline by 3/5/2024

Phone: (808) 832-0682 or cell (808) 392-2504

Also : NIST Contact System under WRAP 2024

 

Room Rates: recommended online registration (online hotel booking)

or call (855) 945-4085 or (808) 922 0511 

Online Waikiki Sunset Booking link website: type WRAP

https://be.synxis.com/?chain=10365&level=chain&locale=enUS&hotel=14882&arrive=05/04/24&depart=05/10/24&promo=WRAP

Mention: WRAP to receive room rate Check In 3 PM, Out 12 PM

(book rooms by April 5, 2024 deadline)

$184.00 per day (500 sq ft one bedroom category with full kitchen)

Plus $30.00 amenity fee per day (below)

Plus 17.96 % taxes (4.712 HIGET + 13.25 TAT)

Total (per night)= 184 + 30 =214 X 17.96%= $252.43 (per night)

15 to 20 Room rates apply for 5/5/24 arrival to 5/11/24 departure

Room Rate for 1-4 Occupancy, children under 18 years.

(max total 4 people per room)

Cancellation: by 4/21/2024, cancellation notice (one night +tax deposit)

Parking $25.00 per day via pay machine in the lobby

(no hotel shuttle)

Catch Taxi or Uber from airport to destination

Meeting room: On 6th floor (21 ft X 25 ft)

$150.00 per day X 4 days = $600.00 X4.712 tax= $628.27

No beverage service provided but may be brought in

(hopefully paid by NCWM)

Amenities: DVD movies, in room coffee/tea packet replenishments, in room safe, 

local and toll free calls, shell lei on arrival, use of pool and beach towels, 

WIFI access and admission to Bishop Museum and Honolulu Museum of 

Art.

Food and Eating: There are no restaurants or bars in the hotel /condo, but there are lots of 

places nearby.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Everett McKinley Dirksen

United States Courthouse

Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn Street

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Office of the Clerk

Phone: (312) 435-5850 

www.ca7.uscourts.gov 

 

NOTICE OF DOCKETING - Short Form

April 27, 2023 

To: Thomas G. Bruton

Clerk of Court

The below captioned appeal has been docketed in the United States Court of Appeals for the 

Seventh Circuit: 

Appellate Case No: 23-1809 

Caption: 

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

JAMES A. DONELSON, 

 Defendant - Appellant

District Court No: 1:20-cv-03758

Clerk/Agency Rep Thomas G. Bruton 

District Judge Thomas M. Durkin 

Date NOA filed in District Court: 04/27/2023

If you have any questions regarding this appeal, please call this office. 

form name: c7_Docket_Notice_short_form (form ID: 188)

Case: 23-1809 Document: 1-3 Filed: 04/27/2023 Pages: 1

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 130 Filed: 05/01/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2957