alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2
                                  ------------

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2001.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Delek Resources, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB for the  period  ended  September  30,  2005,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leonard
Sternheim,  Chief  Accounting  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2001, that:


      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: November 16, 2005

                                /s/ Leonard Sternheim
                                ---------------------
                                Leonard Sternheim,
                                Chief Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  THE  CONDENSED
STATEMENTS  OF  OPERATIONS  AND  CONDENSED  BALANCE  SHEETS  (UNAUDITED)  AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           784,780
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     8,832
<MORTGAGE>                                     104,537
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 1,029,032
<CASH>                                         9,979
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             19,362
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         564,004
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,835,937
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                939,865
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            6,914
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 35
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                245,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     577,154
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,835,937
<PREMIUMS>                                     0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            47,896
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (4,546)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 344,007
<BENEFITS>                                     151,360
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    49,527
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           143,608
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                27,886
<INCOME-TAX>                                   9,802
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            18,084
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   18,084
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0



</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MARSHALL CHARLES RICHMOND,

a.k.a. Marshall Charles Richmond, III,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-30341

D.C. No. 3:03-cr-00370-KI

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Garr M. King, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 13, 2014** 

Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Marshall Charles Richmond appeals from the revocation of supervised

release and the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Richmond’s counsel has filed a brief stating that

FILED

AUG 19 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of

record. Richmond has filed two pro se supplemental briefs. No answering brief

has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. 

All other pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.

2 13-30341
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT
                        -------------------------------






Board of Directors and Stockholders
SFSB Holding Company

We have  reviewed the  accompanying  consolidated  balance sheet of SFSB Holding
Company  and  subsidiary  as of June  30,  2002,  and the  related  consolidated
statements of income for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002 and
2001, and the consolidated  statements of cash flow and changes in stockholders'
equity  for the six  month  period  ended  June  30,  2002.  These  consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute  of  Certified  Public  Accountants.  A review  of  interim  financial
information  consists  principally  of applying  analytical  and  procedures  to
financial  data and making  inquiries of persons  responsible  for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with auditing  standards  generally  accepted in the United States of
America,  the objective of which is the  expression of an opinion  regarding the
financial  statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly,  we do not express such an
opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material  modifications that should
be made to the  accompanying  financial  statements for them to be in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have  previously  audited,  in accordance with auditing  standards  generally
accepted in the United States of America,  the consolidated  balance sheet as of
December 31, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders'  equity  and cash  flows for the year then  ended  (not  presented
herein);  and in our report  dated  March 1, 2002 we  expressed  an  unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.


/s/ S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

Wexford, PA
August 9, 2002
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

| November 12, 2008 | By: /s/ | Valerie G. Brown                    |
|------------------------|--------------|-----------------------------------------------|
| (Date)                 |         | Valerie G. Brown

President

  |

 

|   |
|--------|
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**Report ofIndependent Auditors**

 

Tothe Board of Directors

ofAmeriCredit Corp.

 

Re:                Sale and ServicingAgreement related to AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2004-AF,AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2004-BM, AmeriCredit AutomobileReceivables Trust 2004-1, AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2004-CA, andAmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2004-DF (the “Trusts”) as of and forthe year ended December 31, 2004

 

Wehave examined management’s assertion about AmeriCredit Corp. and itssubsidiaries’ (the “Company”) compliance with the minimum servicing standardsidentified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America’s *Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers*, tothe extent such procedures are applicable, as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2004 included in the accompanying management assertion (ExhibitI).  Management is responsible for theCompany’s compliance with those minimum servicing standards.  Our responsibility is to express an opinionon management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance based on ourexamination.

 

Ourexamination was made in accordance with attestation standards established bythe American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliancewith the minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as weconsidered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion.  Our examination does notprovide a legal determination of the Company’s compliance with the minimumservicing standards.

 

Inour opinion, management’s assertion that the Company has complied with theaforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2004 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP

January26, 2005

 

----

 

Exhibit I

 

AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.

801 Cherry Street, Suite 3900

Fort Worth, Texas  76102

 

**Management’s Assertion Concerning Compliance**

**with USAP Minimum Servicing Standards**

 

January 26, 2005

 

As of and for the period ended December 31, 2004, AmeriCredit Corp. andits subsidiaries have complied in all material respects with the minimumservicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America’s *Uniform Single Attestation Program for MortgageBankers* (“USAP”), to the extent such procedures are applicable.

 
|  /s/ Clifton H. Morris, Jr.     |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
| Clifton H. Morris, Jr.               |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                 |

 
|  /s/ Daniel E. Berce. |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Daniel E. Berce            |
| President                  |

 
|  /s/ Chris A. Choate             |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Chris A. Choate                       |
| Executive Vice President,             |
| Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 225 (Friday, November 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 69459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27547]



[[Page 69459]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL14-95-001]


PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on November 13, 2014, pursuant to section 206 of 
the Federal Power Act, 16 USC 824(e) and Part 35 of the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Regulations, 18 CFR part 35, PJM 
Interconnection, L.L.C. filed clarifications to the language originally 
proposed on August 26, 2014, in compliance with the October 31, 2014 
Order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 149 FERC ] 61,091 (2014) 
(October 31, 2014 Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for electronic review in the 
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an 
``eSubscription'' link on the Web site that enables subscribers to 
receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed 
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#33757661707c5d5f5a5d56604643435c414773555641501d545c45"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b6f0f3e4f5f9d8dadfd8d3e5c3c6c6d9c4c2f6d0d3c4d598d1d9c0">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on December 4, 2014.

     Dated: November 14, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-27547 Filed 11-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

GOLD KIST INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Gold Kist Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, John Bekkers, President and Chief Executive Officer, and principal executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ John Bekkers                     
|John Bekkers                         
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|December 14, 2006                    



---

EXHIBIT 32

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

GOLD KIST INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Gold Kist Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Stephen O. West, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, and principal financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ Stephen O. West                    
|Stephen O. West                        
|Chief Financial Officer, Vice President
|December 14, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3910 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3910

To amend the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century to modify a 
            high priority project in the State of Michigan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 2004

  Mr. Stupak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century to modify a 
            high priority project in the State of Michigan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HIGH PRIORITY PROJECT, MICHIGAN.

    Item number 820 of the table contained in section 1602 of the 
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (112 Stat. 287) is 
amended by striking ``Conduct'' and all that follows through 
``interchange'' and inserting ``Conduct a transportation needs study 
and make improvements to 1-75 interchanges in the Grayling area''.
                                 <all>
```
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5 the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-11411

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN JOSÉ PADILLA,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:99-CR-114-2-Y

 

September 7, 2000

Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM*:

Juan José Padilla appeals his conviction following a

conditional guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute

cocaine. Padilla argues that the district court erred when it

denied his motion to suppress cocaine seized from his car after a

traffic stop. The testimony at the evidentiary hearing indicates

that the information available to the officers gave them reasonable
2

suspicion to think that Padilla was dealing cocaine. Thus, the

officers had reasonable suspicion to make a traffic stop under

Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21-22 (1968), thereby detaining Padilla

until that suspicion could be confirmed or refuted. United States

v. Shabazz, 993 F.2d 431, 435 (5th Cir. 1993).

Padilla contends that the length of time–approximately fortyfive minutes–between the initial stop and the arrival of the dog

transformed the Terry stop into a full-blown arrest without

probable cause. Padilla’s detention lasted no longer than

necessary to effect the purpose of the stop–to identify the package

Garcia had left with from the Schwartz house. United States v.

Sharpe, 105 S.Ct. 1568 (1985); United States v. Zukas, 843 F.2d

179, 182 (5th Cir. 1988). Once the dog alerted to the car, the

officers had probably cause to arrest Padilla. See United States

v. Zucco, 71 F.3d 188, 191-92 (5th Cir. 1995).

Padilla argues that the district court should not have

admitted as expert testimony the testimony of Officer Tebay, one of

the officers who participated in his surveillance. Padilla did not

specify this as an issue for appeal in his conditional guilty plea.

The issue is, therefore, waived. United States v. Wise, 179 F.3d

184, 186 (5th Cir. 1999).

AFFIRMED.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Dontrell L. IVERY, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-7137.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 23, 2004.

Decided: Jan. 5, 2005.

Dontrell L. Ivery, Appellant pro se.

David J. Perri, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Dontrell L. Ivery seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ivery has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF KOGER EQUITY, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,084
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,584
<ALLOWANCES>                                       399
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         949,601
<DEPRECIATION>                                 135,354
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 846,024
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        322,568
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           286
<OTHER-SE>                                     465,126
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   846,024
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,372
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,054
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,381
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    60
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,564
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,313
<INCOME-TAX>                                       212
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,750
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,750
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
        

</TABLE>