alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CBEFF Working Gr

ANSI/NIST Fingerprint Standard Update W

National Institute of Standards and Tech

December 5-6, 2005 

Dale HapeContractor 
Members

• Greg Cannon – Crossmatch• Dale Hapeman* – Contractor - DoD • Mike McCabe – NIST • Rob Mungovan – Aware • Bonny Scheier – Saber• Anne Wang – Cogent Systems* Chair
Proposal

• Add Type-18 CBEFF Record

– Can carry M1 standard biometric 

type

• Provide Annex with example• New fields for Type-10, -13, -14

16

– Make those records conform to C
CBEFF

• Common Biometric Exchange Form

Framework

• INCITS 398-2005• Biometric Information Record (BIR)

– Header– Biometric Data Block (BDB)– optional Signature Block (not used in T

• Exact format and ordering not spec• Type-18 will define
Type-18

e.g., M1 Data Interchange 

e.g., Image

Cond Field Field Name Char 

Code Number Type 

M 18.001 LOGICAL RECORD LENGTH N 

M 18.002 IMAGE DESIGNATION CHARACTER N 

M 18.100 CBEFF HEADER VERSION N 

M 18.101 BIOMETRIC TYPE N 

M 18.102 BIOMETRIC DATA QUALITY AN 

M 18.103 BDB FORMAT OWNER AN 

M 18.104 BDB FORMAT TYPE AN 

M 18.999 BIOMETRIC DATA B 
Field Definitions

Field 18.100: CBEFF Header Version (HDV)• Version of CBEFF specification• INCITS 398-2005 represented by the string ‘0101Field 18.101: Biometric Type (BTY)• Type of biometric technology (CBEFF Table 4)

– fingerprint, iris, etc.

Field 18.102: Biometric Data Quality (BDQ)• Quality of the data in the BDB (0 through 100)

Field 18.103: BDB Format Owner (BFO)

• Vendor, standards body, working group, or indust

has defined the format of the Biometric Data (in th

Field 18.104: BDB Format Type (BFT)• Value assigned by the format owner to represent 

Format
Example

• Biometric Data Block is an INCITS 

standard finger image data record

Field Transaction Record 

LEN 18.001:234519GS 14

IDC 18.002:33 GS 10HDV 18.100:0101 GS 12BTY 18.101:00000008 GS 16BDQ 18:102:80 GS 10BFO 18.103:001B GS 12BFT 18.104:0401 GS 12BDB 18.999:<binary data> FS

See Table 2

234,

Total 234,
e.g., Applied to Typ

Cond Field Field Name 

Code Number 

M 16.001 LOGICAL RECORD LENGTH 

M 16.002 IMAGE DESIGNATION CHARACTER M 16.006 HORIZONTAL LINE LENGTH 

... ... (other Type-16 fields) 

M 16.012 BITS PER PIXEL 

O 16.100 CBEFF HEADER VERSION 

O 16.101 BIOMETRIC TYPE O 16.102 BIOMETRIC DATA QUALITY O 16.103 BDB FORMAT OWNER O 16.104 BDB FORMAT TYPE 

M 16.999 IMAGE DATA 
Contact Informati

Dale HapemanSupport Contractor - Booz Allen HamDepartment of DefenseBiometrics Management Office/Biometrics Fusion Center304-326-3029dale.hapeman@dodbfc.army.mil

www.biometrics.dod.mil
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 612 Agreed to House (ATH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 612

   Expressing unequivocal support for the men and women of our Armed 
   Forces who are currently carrying out missions in and around the 
                          Persian Gulf region.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 17, 1998

Mr. Spence submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing unequivocal support for the men and women of our Armed 
   Forces who are currently carrying out missions in and around the 
                          Persian Gulf region.

Whereas the President of the United States has ordered military action against 
        Iraq in response to its refusal to comply with international obligations 
        under United Nations Security Council resolutions;
Whereas up to 24,000 men and women of the United States Armed Forces are 
        presently involved in operations in and around the Persian Gulf region 
        with the active participation of British Armed Forces and the support of 
        allies in the region;
Whereas additional United States Armed Forces are being deployed to the region; 
        and
Whereas Congress and the American people have the greatest pride in the men and 
        women of the United States Armed Forces and strongly support them in 
        their efforts: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, by the House of Representatives that--
            (1) the Congress unequivocally supports the men and women 
        of our Armed Forces who are carrying out their missions with 
        professionalism, dedication, patriotism, and courage; and
            (2) the Congress reaffirms that it should be the policy of 
        the United States to support efforts to remove the regime 
        headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and to promote the 
        emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime.
                                 <all>
```
September 27 , 2016



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

BLU SHIELDS CONSTRUC TION, LLC AND ARNOLD SHIELDS , Appellant s
NO. 14

- 16

- 00647

- CV V.

ROSSE MARY PEAVY , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard appellee’ s motion to dismiss the appeal from the order signed by the court below on August 15, 2016. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant s , Blu Shields Construction, LLC and Arnold Shields.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 389 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 389

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 13, 2003

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the use of certain grant funds to establish an information 
 clearinghouse that provides information to increase public access to 
                       defibrillation in schools.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Automatic Defibrillation in Adam's 
Memory Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE ACT.

    Subsection (c) of section 312 of the Public Health Service Act (42 
U.S.C. 244), as amended by Public Law 107-188, is amended--
            (1) at the end of paragraph (5), by striking ``and'';
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (7); and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following:
            ``(6) establish an information clearinghouse that provides 
        information to increase public access to defibrillation in 
        schools; and''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 12, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA Y 16, 2018

NO. 03

- 17

- 00496

- CV

Judy Parker; her counsel Koby Wilb anks; Sam M. (Trey) Yates, III; Mike Day; and the Law Office of Sam M. (Trey) Yates, III, P.C., Appellant

v.

Barr y Parker, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBERTON, AND BOURLAN D

VACATED AND DISMISSED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgments signed by the tr i a l court on April 21, 2017. The parties

have filed a joint motion to vacate the trial court’s judgments. H aving considered the motion, the

record in this case, and the parties’ arguments, the Court agrees that the motion should be

granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion , vacates all “ Tr ial Court Judgments and Orders

G ranting Sanctions and/or Attorney’s Fees and all Findings of Facts and Concl usions of Laws

supporting Sanctions and/or Attorney’s Fees,” and dismisses the case

. Each party shall pay the

costs of appeal incurred by that party , both in this Court and the court below.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Loop Spine & Sports Center, Ltd.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02590

Honorable Charles R. Norgle Sr.

Lifestyle Nutrition, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, October 28, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles R. Norgle: Civil case terminated

[14]. Mailed notice(ewf, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02590 Document #: 15 Filed: 10/28/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:62
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

ANTHONY IBEKIE, also known as 

“Emeka Toni Ibe,” “Toni Ibe Emeka,” 

and “Emenike Tonero”; and 

JENNIFER GOSHA

No. 20 CR 352

Judge Steven C. Seeger

GOVERNMENT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

The United States of America, by its attorney, MORRIS PASQUAL, Acting 

United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, respectfully moves this 

Court for a four-day extension of time to file its Santiago proffer. In support of this 

motion, the government states as follows:

This case is set for a jury trial on June 17, 2024. The government’s deadline to 

file its Santiago proffer is March 11, 2024. Dkt. 243. The government is diligently 

working on its proffer, but the undersigned is scheduled to be out of the office the 

week of March 4, 2024. Accordingly, the government requests a brief four-day 

extension of time, or until March 15, 2024, to file its Santiago proffer.

The government has conferred with defense counsel on the motion, none of 

whom object to the requested extension. 

Case: 1:20-cr-00352 Document #: 257 Filed: 02/29/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:2037
2

Respectfully submitted,

MORRIS PASQUAL

Acting United States Attorney

By: /s/ Paige A. Nutini

PAIGE A. NUTINI

Assistant United States Attorney

219 South Dearborn Street, 5th Floor

Chicago, IL 60604

(312) 353-5300

DATED: February 29, 2024

Case: 1:20-cr-00352 Document #: 257 Filed: 02/29/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:2038
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of DoubleClick Inc. (the Company) for
the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Kevin P. Ryan, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) the Report fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|
| | (2) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ KEVIN P. RYAN      
| |                        
| | Kevin P. Ryan          
| | Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 9, 2004
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

____________________________________ 

MISH INT’L MONETARY INC., : 

on behalf of itself and : 

all others similarly situated, : 

 : Case No. 20-cv-04577 

v. : 

 : Judge Gary Feinerman 

VEGA CAPITAL LONDON, LTD. : Magistrate Judge Jeffrey T. Gilbert 

and JOHN DOES 1-100. : 

____________________________________x 

JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF 

AN AGREED PROPOSED PROTECTIVE 

ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY 

 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), Plaintiff Mish International Monetary 

Inc. and Defendant Vega Capital London, Ltd. jointly move this Court for entry of the enclosed 

agreed-upon [Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order. In support of this motion, they state as 

follows: 

1. Defendant is prepared to produce its initial regulatory document production to 

Plaintiff. Such production includes confidential information. The parties also anticipate that 

they may need to exchange additional confidential information. 

2. In order to facilitate the exchange of confidential information, the parties agree 

that entry of a protective order is appropriate. 

3. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a .pdf copy of the proposed protective order 

agreed-upon by the parties. Contemporaneously with this filing, the parties have also transmitted 

a Microsoft Word version of the proposed order to this Court at the following email address: 

Proposed_Order_Feinerman@ilnd.uscourts.gov. 

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Mish International Monetary Inc. and Defendant Vega Capital 

London, Ltd. respectfully request that this Court enter the attached proposed protective order. 
2 

Dated: November 4, 2020 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Andrew Szot 

Marvin A. Miller 

Andrew Szot 

Miller Law LLC 

115 S. LaSalle Street, Suite 2910 

Chicago, Illinois 60603 

312.332.3400 

mmiller@millerlawllc.com 

Christopher Lovell 

Christopher M. McGrath 

Lovell Stewart Halebian Jacobson LLP 

500 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2440 

New York, New York 10110 

212-608-1900

clovell@lshllp.com

Counsel for Plaintiff Mish International

Monetary Inc. 

/s/ Amy Graham Doehring 

Amy Graham Doehring 

Akerman LLP 

71 S. Wacker Drive, 47th Floor 

Chicago, IL 60606 

(312) 634-5700

amy.doehring@akerman.com

Michael P. Kelly 

Akerman LLP 

750 Ninth Street, N.W., Suite 750 

Washington, DC 20001 

(202) 393-6222

michael.kelly@akerman.com

Joel S. Forman 

Meghan K. Boland 

Akerman LLP 

520 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor 

New York, NY 10022 

(212) 880-3800

joel.forman@akerman.com

meghan.boland@akerman.com

Counsel for Defendant Vega Capital London, 

Ltd. 
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on November 4, 2020, I caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

Joint Motion For Entry of An Agreed Proposed Protective Order Regarding Confidentiality

to be served on all counsel of record via filing electronically on the Court’s CM/ECF system. 

/s/ Andrew Szot
#### HAWN v. POPE & TALBOT, Inc. (Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corp. et al., Third-Party Defendants).

No. 9130.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

Sept. 28, 1951.

*339Charles Lakatos, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Mark D. Alspach, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant Pope & Talbot, Inc.

Thomas F. Mount, Philadelphia, Pa., for third-party defendant Haenn Ship Ceiling and Refitting Corp.

McGRANERY, District Judge.

Since filing opinion in this case on July 17, 1951, D.C., 99 F.Supp. 226, a further hearing has been held and all parties concerned have moved the court for entry of final judgment. At that hearing, additional evidence was introduced showing that Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corp., third party defendant, notwithstanding the plaintiff’s election to sue, has continued paying compensation at the rate of $25 per week as provided by the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Act and that as of September 24, 1951 there will have been paid in compensation a total of $5,050. It further appears that the third party defendant has paid for medical and hospital expenses the sum of $831.35 and that the plaintiff has agreed, if and when his judgment against the original defendant is collected, to repay to the third party defendant all sums paid by it to him as compensation and as well the sum of $831.35 for medical and hospital expenses. It is further stipulated that the limit of the third party defendant’s obligation to pay compensation under the Act is $7,500. Upon considqration of this evidence and the law applicable to the case, the original opinion, insofar as the manner in which it provides for the entry of judgment, is hereby modified, and that judgment is entered as follows:

Judgment is entered in favor of Charles ITawn, plaintiff, against Pope & Talbot, Inc. in the amount of $29,700 with interest and costs; and in favor of Pope & Talbot, Tnc., against Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corp., third party defendant, in the amount of $8,331.35 with interest and costs, with leave to the third party defendant to move for modification of the judgment against it should it hereafter appear that for any reason it may be relieved from paying the full limit of its obligation for compensation under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Act.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.1

Eastern Division

Glenn Williams, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−00420

Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt

City of Chicago, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, August 21, 2023:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Heather K. McShain: Plaintiffs' unopposed

motion for extension of time to submit joint status report [231] is granted. The deadline

for the parties' joint status report [230] is extended until 08/25/2023. Mailed notice. (pk, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-00420 Document #: 232 Filed: 08/21/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:4072
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§ 1350)




I,
Randall J. Frapart of US Dataworks, Inc., certify pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(i)           the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”),
which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




(ii)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of US Dataworks, Inc. as of
the dates and for the periods expressed in the report.




Dated: August
      16, 2010
            
            
            /s/
      Randall J. FrapartRandall
      J. FrapartChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
#### In the Matter of the Application of Paladino Engineering Co., Inc., to Cancel and Discharge a Lien against Contract No. 9107 Filed by Mahoney-Clarke, Inc., in the Office of the State Commissioner of Highways and the State Comptroller of the State of New York.

Supreme Court, Kings County,

April 11, 1926.

Liens — cancellation — Supreme Court without power to cancel lien against State highway contract filed pursuant to Lien Law, §§ 6 and 12 — Lien Law, § 21, outlines procedure by which- lien may be discharged.

A lien filed against a State highway contract pursuant to sections 6 and 12 of the Lien Law may not be canceled and discharged by a summary application to the Supreme Court.

*874Section 21 of the Lien Law specifically outlines the procedure by which such a lien may be discharged and nowhere in said section is the Supreme Court given power to grant such an application-.

Motion for an order canceling and discharging a notice of lien filed in the office of the State Commissioner of Highways and the State Comptroller on the ground that the same is improperly filed and that the amount of the indebtedness claimed therein is not the subject of a valid lien.

*Arthur T.*Stern, for Paladino Engineering Co., Inc.

*Emil Weitzner,*for Mahoney-Clarke, Inc.

Faber, J.

I am of the opinion that this court is without power to grant this motion. The lien- is filed pursuant to sections 5 and 12 of the Lien Law (added by Laws of1911, chap. 873, as amd. by Laws of 1916, chap. 507), and section 21 (added by Laws of 1911, chap. 873, as amd. by Laws of 1914, chap. 266, and Laws of 1916, chap. 507) specifically provides the methods by which such a lien may be discharged, and nowhere in that section is this court empowered to entertain-a summary application for the discharge of a lien or to consider the validity of the claims embraced in such notice of lien. Questions similar to those presented here have already been passed upon adversely to the contentions of the moving party. *(Matter of Ruderman,*179 N. Y. Supp. 452; *Matter of Cohen, No. 1,*209 App. Div. 413; *Matter of Rudiger,*118 id. 86.)

Motion must be denied.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 10-K/A
 (Amendment No. 1)
 x
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
 OR
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from ______________ to _________________.
 Commission File Number: 333-115328
 
 PeopleSupport, Inc.
  Delaware(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
    
    95-4695021
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)1100 Glendon Ave., Suite 1250
Los Angeles, California
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    90024
(Zip Code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code
 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act
 Title of Each Class
    
    Name of Each Exchange on Which RegisteredCommon Stock, par value $0.001 per share
    
    Nasdaq National Market
 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act
 
 o x
 o x
 x o
 o
  o x o
 o x
   DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE




---



##### 



Explanatory Note




---



##### 



SIGNATURE
  PEOPLESUPPORT, INC.By:
    /s/ LANCE ROSENZWEIGLance RosenzweigChief Executive Officer, and
Chairman of the Board of Directors