alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.1

I, Thomas SooHoo, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of eLong, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and
have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: June 29, 2006



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Thomas SooHoo      
|Name:  |  | Thomas SooHoo          
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS (CHICAGO)

______________________________________________________________________________

BRITAIN ALEXANDER, CASE NO. 1:20-cv-04041

Plaintiff,

v. Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman

TRANS UNION LLC,

Defendant.

______________________________________________________________________________

JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

______________________________________________________________________________

Plaintiff, Britain Alexander, by counsel, and Defendant, Trans Union, LLC (“Trans 

Union”), by counsel, hereby inform this Court that Plaintiff and Trans Union have reached a 

settlement as to all matters raised by Plaintiff against Trans Union in this action. Plaintiff and 

Trans Union anticipate filing a Stipulation Of Dismissal With Prejudice and Proposed Order 

shortly, once the settlement is consummated; however, the Court will retain jurisdiction until that 

is completed. 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Syed H. Hussain (with consent)

Syed H. Hussain, Esq. 

Bar Number: Illinois 6331378 

Price Law Group, APC

440 N. McClurg Ct. #803 

Chicago, IL 60611 

T: (818) 600-5535 

F: (818) 600-5435 

E: syed@pricelawgroup.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/ Kari A. Morrigan

Sandra Davis Jansen, Esq. (IL #2780353)

Kari A. Morrigan, Esq. (IL #3470649)

Schuckit & Associates, P.C.

4545 Northwestern Drive

Zionsville, IN 46077

Telephone: 317-363-2400 

Fax: 317-363-2257

E-Mail: sjansen@schuckitlaw.com 

 kmorrigan@schuckitlaw.com 

Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
Page 2 of 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing has been filed electronically 

on the 19th day of October, 2020. Notice of this filing will be sent to the following parties by 

operation of the Court’s electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court’s 

electronic filing.

Syed H. Hussain, Esq.

syed@pricelawgroup.com

The undersigned further certifies that a true copy of the foregoing was served on the 

following parties via First Class, U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, on the 19th day of October, 2020

properly addressed as follows:

None.

/s/ Kari A. Morrigan

Sandra Davis Jansen, Esq. (IL #2780353)

Kari A. Morrigan, Esq. (IL #3470649)

Schuckit & Associates, P.C.

4545 Northwestern Drive

Zionsville, IN 46077

Telephone: 317-363-2400 

Fax: 317-363-2257

E-Mail: sjansen@schuckitlaw.com

 kmorrigan@schuckitlaw.com

Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
Th 

The 

Enab

Nanoma

TM “Perspective of a Start-up 

that has moved thru Scale-up

Markets

NIS

into Commercialization” 

NIS

Gaith

Feb. 2

David J. Arthur, CEOSouthWest NanoTechnologies, Inc.http://swentnano.com
Carbon Nanotubes (CNT)

Single-wall

Single‐wall

Printed 

Electronics

1‐2 nm

Specialty

Battery 

Materials

Multi-wall

Multi‐wall 

Multi‐wall
Start‐up:

Founded by 

Daniel Resa

2001

1 g/d

CNT Pilot Plant circa 2005

1 g/d

sca
CoMoCAT® process

FlFluidized uidizedBedBed

p

u d ed

(Inherently Scalable

SWCNT

Fluidized Bed

(Inherently Scalable)

S C

Catalyst

Proprietary Catalyst

(Selective Synthesis)

gas

(Selective Synthesis)
Scale‐up:

New CNT Production Plant, 

Fall 2008 Fall 2008

Norman OK

100 ~ 

10,000 

g/day scale

Norman, OK

Fluidized Bed R

g/day scale
Scale‐up (cont’d):

Industrial Scale Purification 

nano

Metrol
Single‐wall CNTs

Conductive & Semiconducting Semiconducting Grades

SWeNT® 

Met. tube

SWeNT® SG76

Met. tubes ~ 35%
Quality:

Process Improvements in Synthesis & Purificat

T2

T1

1 wt% 

residue

8 wt% 

residue
Quality (cont’d):

...Without evidence of tube damag
Printed Electronics

CNT TAM for CNT Ink in Printed El

for Printed Electronics M

200250300

ons

50

100150

$ millio

0

2010 2011 2012 2013 

Year

Lighting Touch Displays TFTs RFID 
Where is the 

market going?

 Thinner, Lighter.

Glass 

 Plas

Lar

ge displa

y area. 

 Flexible Rugged Flexible ITO Si

 Org

, Rugged.

 Touch interface. 

ITO, Si

 Org

 Lower cost. h li

Printed Electr

S

hort c

y

c

le t

ime.
Why print electronics?

Additive Proces

(Printing)

Subtractive Process 

(Photolithography)

Expose



Less steps. 

 Less waste.

DevelopEtch / strip

Less waste.

 Lower cost. 

3/10/2011 

Etch

/ strip

 Short cycle 
Lower Cost 

T tC d t Transparent Conductors:

TransparentConductor Cost($/m2)

$40$50$60

Save

$10$20$30 Pattern

Materia

Save70% 

$0

$10

ITO CNT

Big incentive to switch to CNT for Touch sensoCost can be reduced by at least 10%. Cycle time be reduced from 1 week to 1 day. 
Performance:

> 1 μm > 99%

Large

Longer 

Tubes

Metallic Small

High 

Purity

TCF

Large

Dia.

Metallic

Enriched

TFT

Small

Dia.

~ 1.5 nm ~ 0.8 nm > 70% 

TCF TFT

< 100 

Ω/sq

> 90% VLT

Mobility > 10 On/Off

> 10

5

90% VLT On/Off 10
Commercialization
V2VTM Ink Technology*

CNT Ink

* P

CNTs can be printed using Standard 

I d t i l P i ti E i tIndustrial Printing Equipment
Screen Printing Demo

( i us ng V2VTM i k) n
Apps Dev is Key!

A li ti Applications Dl 

eve opmen
What are the Barriers? Barriers?

• Performance

– Metrology– Quality Improvement

• Easy & Safe to Use

– Inks– nanoEHS

• Supply Chain Supply Chain

– Apps Dev– St t i Alli (Gl b l) Strategic Alliances (Global)
Thank you

Q&
#### STATE v. GOODE

No. 10A94-2

Case below: Johnston County Superior Court

Motion by defendant (Goode) for temporary stay denied 25 June 1997. Petition by Attorney General for writ of supersedeas allowed 25 June 1997. Petition by Attorney General for writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Johnston County allowed 25 June 1997. Motion by defendant for temporary stay denied 30 June 1997.
9948.

#### Hamp, alias Hamilton, *v.*The State.

Decided January 9, 1919.

Indictment for violation of prohibition law; from Jasper superior court—Judge Park. June 14, 1918.

*Greene F. Johnson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Doyle Campbell, solicitor-general,*contra.

Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new .trial in this ease contains the general grounds only. ■ There is some evidence to support the verdict, which has' the approval of the trial judge, and this court will not interfere.

*■Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.*
exv10w1



 








Exhibit 10.1




SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION PAYABLE TO NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS




Director Cash Fees




     Each
Non-Employee Director is paid an annual retainer of $20,000 and each
Non-Employee Director Committee Chair is paid an annual retainer of
$24,000, payable in equal installments at the time of each quarterly
meeting. In addition, each Non-Employee Director receives, as applicable




	 	•	 	a per Board meeting attendance fee of $1,200 per meeting (a)
	 
	 	•	 	a per Committee attendance fee of $750 for Committee members
(a)
	 
	 	•	 	a per telephonic meeting attendance fee of $500






               (a)
Directors may receive only one meeting fee per day paid at the
highest fee.



Director Stock Option Plan




     Under the Independent Directors’ Stock Option Plan (the “Directors’ Plan”), each Non-Employee
Director elected to the Board is granted an option to purchase 1,500 shares of common stock each
year. In addition, any newly elected Non-Employee Director is
initially granted an option to purchase 6,000 shares under this same
plan. All options vest as of date granted.



Travel Expense Reimbursement




     Directors are entitled to reimbursement of their reasonable travel expenses for attending
Board of Directors and Board Committee meetings.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Mercari Communications Group, Ltd. on Form
10-QSB/A for the  period ending November 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the  Report), I, Robert W. Marsik,
Chief Executive/Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my  knowledge and belief:

|(1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: June
17, 2004 |  | By:/s/  Robert W. Marsik
      Robert W. Marsik, Chief Executive Officer
      Chief Financial Officer
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating,  acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of  this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| May 12, 2008 | By: /s/ | David A. Wheat                                                                                         |
|------------------------|--------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (Date)                 |         | David A. Wheat

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

  |

 

 

 

----
Exhibit 13.1



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers
of Vuance Ltd. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: May 9, 2012 | /s/ Doron Levy                
|------------------ | ------------------------------
|                   | By: Doron Levy                
|                   | Title: Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Thomas W. Winfree, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Village Bank and Trust Financial Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2005;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of  the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  March 20, 2006

By: /s/ Thomas W. Winfree

Thomas W. Winfree

President and

Chief Executive Officer
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-12-00623- CR

Richard Asa Todd , Appellan t

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E CO UNTY COURT AT LAW NO . 3 O F WI LLIAM SO N COUNTY NO. 11- 0734 8-3 , TH E H ONO RAB LE DOUG ARNO LD, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Richard Asa Todd seeks to appea l from a judgme nt of conviction for assault. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.01 (West 2011). The trial court has cer tified that appellant has waived the right of appea l. Acc ordi n gl y , t h e appea l is dismiss ed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a) (2), ( d).

__________________________________________ J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Rose and Goodw in Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Oc tober 5, 2012 Do Not Publish
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Southern Community Financial Corp. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2004, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their knowledge and belief: (1) the Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in the Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Bank as of and for the periods presented.











/s/ Thomas W. Winfree

March 21, 2005

Thomas W. Winfree

Date

Chief Executive Officer











/s/ C. Harril Whitehurst, Jr.

March 21, 2005

C. Harril Whitehurst, Jr.

Date

Chief Financial Officer
9671.

#### Louisville & Nashville *Railroad Co. v.*Hemphill.

Decided November 8, 1918.

Action for damages; from Murray-superior- court—Judge Tarver. March 9, 1918.

*C. N. King, D. W. Blair,*for plaintiff in error.

*H. H. Anderson,*contra.

Luke, J.

1. The jury were authorized to find that the presumption of negligence on the part of the railroad company, which arose on proof of the killing of the plaintiff’s mule by a train of the company, was not rebutted by the evidence introduced by the defendant.

2. When considered in connection with the i-emainder of the charge of the court and in connection with the pleadings and contentions of the parties, the excerpt complained of was not error.

3. The petition, as amended, was not subject to the demurrers urged and overruled. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. See *Seaboard Air-Line Railway*v. *Moore,*20 *Ga. App.*33 (92 S. E. 388), and cases cited.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 422 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          May 12, 1998.
Whereas law enforcement officers work daily in communities across the Nation, 
        assisting individuals in the pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness;
Whereas law enforcement officers are, most often, the first contact individuals 
        have with their representatives of government, and they perform the 
        duties and responsibilities of that important liaison role with wisdom 
        and compassion;
Whereas law enforcement officers are expected to perform duties above and beyond 
        those of the average person, including duties such as rescuing 
        individuals from a multitude of life-threatening incidents and assisting 
        families during times of great personal sorrow;
Whereas law enforcement officers engage in a variety of tasks, from visiting 
        with home-bound elderly citizens, mediating domestic disputes, and 
        providing counsel to youngsters on our streets, to retrieving lost pets 
        and bringing a spirit of friendship and compassion to an environment 
        often lacking in these essential qualities;
Whereas law enforcement officers daily encounter individuals within our society 
        who reject all moral values and ethical codes of conduct in pursuit of 
        criminal activities;
Whereas law enforcement officers risk their health, lives, and future happiness 
        with their families in order to safeguard communities from criminal 
        predation;
Whereas in the course of their duties, law enforcement officers may find 
        themselves not only in harm's way, but also victims of violent crime; 
        and
Whereas 159 law enforcement officers throughout the country lost their lives in 
        the performance of their duty in 1997, and more than 14,000 men and 
        women have made that supreme sacrifice to date: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that the 
contributions made by law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty should 
be honored, their dedication and sacrifice recognized, and their unselfish 
service to the Nation remembered.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 35.1



ANNUAL MASTER SERVICER’S CERTIFICATE





GE DEALER FLOORPLAN MASTER NOTE TRUST



March 26, 2012



The undersigned, a
duly authorized officer of General Electric Capital Corporation (“GECC”), as the master servicer (the “Master
Servicer”), pursuant to the Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement dated as of June 30, 2006 (as may be further amended
and supplemented from time to time, the “Agreement”), between GECC and GE Dealer Floorplan Master Note Trust
(“Trust”), does hereby certify that:



1.	GECC is, as of the date hereof, Master Servicer under
the Agreement.



2.	The undersigned is an authorized officer
who is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this certificate to the Trust.



3.	A review of the activities of Master
Servicer during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the “reporting period”), and of its performance under the
Agreement, has been made under my supervision.



4.	To the best of my knowledge, based
on such review, Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
reporting period.













IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned has duly executed this certificate the date first above written.



_____/s/ Thomas A. Davidson_____________________

Name: Thomas A. Davidson

Title:   Authorized Signatory of General
Electric Capital 
Corporation





2