alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dependencies and 

Cascading Effects 

Presenter: Kent Yu, PhD, PE, SE

 SEFT Consulting Group, LLC
Cascading Effects 

Power 

System 

INTERNAL 

Cascading 

Failure 

(2003 NE 

Blackout) 

Power 

System 

EXTERNAL 

Cascading 

Failure 

(2003 NE 

Blackout)
Dimensions of Dependencies

• Internal and External 

• Time 

• Space 

• Source 

(These dimensions may not be independent)
Internal and External Dependencies

• Internal Dependency (examples)

• Physical Infrastructure System

• Equipment and Repair Supplies

• Operations Center (and more)

• External Dependency (examples)

• Transportation

• Power

• Communication (and more)

(It is also good to consider who may depend on your system)
Time Dimension

• Recovery Phases

• Short-Term, Intermediate, and Long-Term 

• Dependencies may change from one phase to 

another

• Performance goals, and restoration sequence and 

pace are influenced by external dependencies of 

other infrastructure systems and community needs

 
Time Dimension

Phase I – Short-Term Phase II – Intermediate Phase III – Long-Term 
Space Dimension

(Source: The Oregon Resilience Plan, 2013)
Space Dimension

(Source: City of Portland, 2012)
Source Dimension

Additional Examples

• Wholesale Water Supplier

• Wholesale Power supplier

• Centralized Warehouse of A 

Healthcare System

(Source: Yumei Wang, Steven F. Bartlett & 

Scott Miles, 2012)

Source: http://www.bppipelines.com/cartoonmaps/olympic.pdf
Remarks

• Dependency relationship is complex and multidimensional

• Consider various dimensions of dependencies 

within each service provider

• Community-wide coordination 

• Strategies to reduce dependencies
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 32
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Airxcel, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof and to which this Certification is an
exhibit (the "Report"), I, Melvin L. Adams, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and I, Richard L. Schreck, Secretary/Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: 8-12-05


By: /s/ Melvin L. Adams
    ---------------------------------
    Melvin L. Adams
    President and Chief Executive
    Officer

Date: 8-12-05


By: /s/ Richard L. Schreck
    ---------------------------------
    Richard L. Schreck
    Secretary/Treasurer and Chief
    Financial Officer


                                       19
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

 

# **I, Jonathan C. Coon, certify that:**

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of 1-800 CONTACTS, INC.;

2.               Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)              Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)              Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a)              All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and reportfinancial information; and

b)             Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Dated:  November 12, 2004 | /s/ Jonathan C. Coon    |   |
|---------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                      | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

WESTERN DIVISION

TRICIA MARVIN, individually, 

and as representative of a Class of 

Participants and Beneficiaries 

of the Mercy Health Corporation 

Employees’ Retirement Plan, 

Case No. 20-cv-50293

Plaintiff,

v.

MERCY HEALTH CORPORATION, et. al.

Defendants

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, Tricia Marvin, hereby provides Notice to this Court that pursuant to FED. R.

CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), this matter may be voluntarily dismissed without prejudice. 

Dated: August 27, 2020 By:_s/ James A. Walcheske___________

James A. Walcheske, SBN 1065635

Walcheske & Luzi, LLC

235 North Executive Drive, Suite 240

Brookfield, Wisconsin 53005

Telephone: (262) 780-1953

Email: jwalcheske@walcheskeluzi.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case: 3:20-cv-50293 Document #: 9 Filed: 08/27/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:105
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The certifications setforth below are hereby submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commissionpursuant to, and solely for the purpose of complying with, Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code in connection with the filingon the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of MAIR Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”)for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”).

 

The undersigned, theChief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,hereby certifies that, as of the end of the period covered by the Report:

 

1.               Such Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ PAUL F. FOLEY                       |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                    |
| Paul F. Foley                           |
| President, Chief  Executive Officer and |
| acting Chief Financial  Officer         |
| February 6,  2008                  |
H. Res. 194

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 24, 1997.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2203) making appropriations for energy and

water development for the fiscal year ending September 30,

1998, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill

shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to

the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the

bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute

rule. Points of order against provisions in the bill for failure

to comply with clause 2 or 6 of rule XXI are waived. During

consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the

Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition

on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment

has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congres-
2

•HRES 194 EH

sional Record designated for that purpose in clause 6 of rule

XXIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read.

The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any

amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum

time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without intervening business,

provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on the

first in any series of questions shall be fifteen minutes. At

the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with

such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7079

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus FELTON ANTHONY WIGGINS, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-91-32-NN, CA-97-52-4) Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 27, 1998 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles E. Haden, Hampton, Virginia, for Appellant. Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Timothy Richard Murphy, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Felton Anthony Wiggins appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for an extension of time to appeal from the order denying his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss this appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Wiggins , Nos. CR-91-32-NN; CA-97-52-4 (E.D. Va. July 1, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF POLYPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

|Name of Subsidiary                              |  | State or jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Alnery No. 104 Limited                          |  | Hong Kong                                             
|Celgard K.K.                                    |  | Japan                                                 
|Celgard Korea Ltd.(1)                           |  | Korea                                                 
|Celgard, LLC                                    |  | Delaware                                              
|Daramic (Shanghai) Battery Separators Co., Ltd. |  | China                                                 
|Daramic (Thailand) Limited                      |  | Thailand                                              
|Daramic Asia, Inc.                              |  | Delaware                                              
|Daramic Holding S.A.S.                          |  | France                                                
|Daramic International, Inc.                     |  | Delaware                                              
|Daramic S.A.S.                                  |  | France                                                
|Daramic S.r.l.                                  |  | Italy                                                 
|Daramic Separadores de Baterias Ltda.           |  | Brazil                                                
|Daramic, LLC                                    |  | Delaware                                              
|Membrana GmbH                                   |  | Germany                                               
|Polypore Acquisition GmbH                       |  | Germany                                               
|Polypore B.V.                                   |  | Netherlands                                           
|Polypore C.V.                                   |  | Netherlands                                           
|Polypore Holdings, Inc.                         |  | Delaware                                              
|Polypore, Inc.                                  |  | Delaware                                              
|PP Holding Corporation                          |  | Delaware                                              

---

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 224 (Thursday, November 20, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 69057]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27529]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 13-2003; MB Docket No. 11-167; RM-11645]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Altamont, Oregon

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Audio Division, at the request of Threshold 
Communications, substitutes FM Channel 235C1 for Channel 249C1 at 
Altamont, Oregon. Channel 235C1 can be allotted at Altamont in 
compliance with the Commission's minimum distance separation 
requirements with a site restriction of 20 km (12.6 miles) northeast of 
Altamont, at 42-08-37 North Latitude and 121-30-19 West Longitude.

DATES: Effective November 20, 2014, and applicable November 11, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah A. Dupont, Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2700.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MB Docket No. 11-167, adopted September 26, 2013, and 
released September 27, 2013. The full text of this Commission decision 
is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street SW., Room CY-
A257, Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this decision also may 
be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy 
and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 
20554, (800) 378-3160, or via the company's Web site, www.bcpiweb.com. 
This document does not contain proposed information collection 
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 
104-13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any proposed 
information collection burden ``for small business concerns with fewer 
than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief 
Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). The 
Commission will send a copy of this Report and Order in a report to be 
sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to 
the Congressional Review Act, see U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio, Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
Nazifa Sawez
 Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal 
Communications Commission amends 47 CFR part 73 as follows:

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

0
1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec.  73.202  [Amended]

0
2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Oregon is 
amended by removing Channel 249C1 at Altamont; and by adding Channel 
235C1 at Altamont.

[FR Doc. 2014-27529 Filed 11-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
___________ No. 95-4237

___________ Scandia Stucco Co., * * Petitioner, * * v. * * National Labor Relations Board, * * Respondent. *

___________ Appeals from an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. No. 96-1373

___________ [UNPUBLISHED] Scandia Stucco Co., * * Respondent, * * v. * * National Labor Relations Board, * * Petitioner. *

_____________ Submitted: November 21, 1996 Filed: November 27, 1996

_____________ Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________
PER CURIAM.
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) seeks enforcement of a n order requiring Scand ia Stucco Co. (Scandia) to abide by the terms of the master collective bargaining agreement with the union and to cease an d desist from certain unfair labor practices.

### -2- Following a hearing on the complaint, the administrative law judg e (ALJ) ruled that Scan dia violated 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1)(5) by repudiating the master collective bargaining agreement with the union, by refusing to provid e the union with information relevant to the union's collective

bargaining duties, and by refusing to cooperate in processing a grievance. The ALJ also ruled that Scandia violated 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1)(3) by telling its employees they would no longer be represented by their union and by constructively discharging a union member who left the company. Th e NLRB adopted the ALJ's findings, conclusions, and rulings.
Scandia contends the NLRB's order is based on erroneous lega l rulings, is not supported by substantial evidence on the record, and the order should not be e nforced. A review of the record, however, shows the ALJ's findings are supported by ample evidence, and the rulings are clearl y correct. Thus, the NLRB's order is enforced. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
10012.

#### McDonald *v.*Bell.

Jenkins, J.

1. A landlord may elect to treat an undertenant or lessee of his premises as his own tenant, and, upon such, an affirmative election being made, the continued occupancy of the premisés by the under, tenant operates to render him liable to the landlord for the rent subsequently accruing. *Hudson*v. *Stewart,*110 *Ga.*37 (35 S. E. 178) ; *Fountain*v. *Whitehead,*119 *Ga.*241 (46 S. E. 104) ; *McConnell*v. *East Point Land Co.,*100 *Ga.*129 (28 S. E. 80) ; *Hearn*v. *Huff,*6 *Ga. App.*56 (64 S. E. 298).

2. While it is true that “when a party assumes a certain position in a legal proceeding, and succeeds in maintaining that position through a judgment of the court, or through the acquiescence of the opposite party to his prejudice, he will not thereafter be permitted to assume, as to the same subject-matter and against the same adversary, a contrary position” *(Rap*v. *Cruce,*21 *Ga. App.*539, 541, 94 S. E. 899, and eases there cited), this principle of law can not be invoked in favor of the plaintiff in the present distress-warrant proceeding. Although the record discloses testimony to the effect that in a former proceeding instituted by the same plaintiff to evict the same defendant as an intruder, and which resulted in a mistrial, the defendant himself testified that he had been accepted by the owner as the tenant of the property now involved in lieu of the original tenant, still, since it ^appears that *563the plaintiff, *by*her own testimony in the present distress-warrant proceeding, has completely negatived her right to maintain such remedy, by repeatedly and unequivocally stating that she never at any time accepted or recognized the defendant as her tenant, but that she continued to bold the original tenant liable under the terms of his agreement, she is bound by her own solemn and fatal admissions thus made, despite the testimony as to what had been the previous conduct and admissions of the opposite party. ,

Decided April 16, 1919.

Distraint; from city court'of Blakely—Judge Sheffield. May *21,*1918.

*L. M.*Rambo, *A. H.*Gray, for plaintiff.

*A. L.*Miller, for defendant.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.*
Siddiqui, Asiya T. (Ctr)

From:

Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2023 4:54 PM

To: cyberframework

Subject: Feedback | NIST CSF 2.0 Core - Discussion Draft

Hi. Some feedback for the NIST CSF 2.0 Core

There is a lack of inclusion of Cyber Threat Intel. It doesn’t sit naturally where it is currently mentioned in passing in

the sub-categories; it is not a ‘cyber security outcome’. Perhaps it would sit well as a separate Function (‘Predict’

maybe?), paired with Risk in same, rather than Identify. Or if not as part of a ‘Predict' Function then a new category

in Identify to sit alongside Risk Assessment, where it can be broken out and detailed more appropriately as a NIST

2.0 categegory eg ID.TI

Looking forward to seeing the final 2.0 product.

cheers

Ben Full

1
Exhibit 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF GFI GROUP INC.

Name of Subsidiary

Jurisdiction of FormationAmerex Brokers Canada, Inc.

CanadaAmerex Brokers LLC

DelawareCentury Chartering (U.K.) Ltd

United KingdomChristopher Street Capital Limited

United KingdomdVega Limited

United KingdomFenics Limited

United KingdomFenics Software Inc.

DelawareFenics Software Limited

United KingdomGFI Advisory (China) Co. Limited

ChinaGFI Brokers (Chile) Agentes De Valores SpA

ChileGFI Brokers Limited

United KingdomGFI Brokers LLC

DelawareGFI Brokers (SA) (PTY) Limited

South AfricaGFI Exchange Colombia (SA).

ColombiaGFI Finance S.a.r.l.

LuxembourgGFI Group LLC

New YorkGFI Group Pte. Limited

SingaporeGFI Group S.a.r.l.

LuxembourgGFI Group Services Lux Limited

United KingdomGFI (HK) Brokers Limited

Hong KongGFI (HK) Securities LLC

New YorkGFI Holdings Limited

United KingdomGFI Korea Money Brokerage Limited

KoreaGFI Markets Ltd.

United KingdomGFInet Europe Limited

United KingdomGFInet inc.

DelawareGFInet UK Limited

United KingdomGFI Newgate Limited

United KingdomGFI Securities Limited

United KingdomGFI Securities Colombia (SA).

ColombiaGFI Securities LLC

New YorkGFI TP Holdings Pte. Ltd.

SingaporeGFI TP Limited

United KingdomGM Capital Markets Limited

United KingdomInteractive Ventures LLC

DelawareKyte Broking Limited.

United KingdomKyte Capital Management Limited

United KingdomKyte Group Limited

United KingdomTrayport Inc.

DelawareTrayport Limited

United Kingdom


---



QuickLinks