alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Mercari Communications Group, Ltd.. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended November 30,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Robert W. Marsik, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: May
18, 2005 |  | By:/s/  Robert W. Marsik
      Robert W. Marsik, Chief Executive Officer
      Chief Financial Officer
      (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating,  acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of  this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

M ichael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk July 24, 2012

d0716 

# Order

July 24, 2012

145010 & (17)(19)(20)

GE MONEY BANK,

Plaintiff

- Counter

Defendant

- Appellee,

v SC: 145010

COA: 306506

Ingham CC: 11

- 000655

- AV

CONSTANCE HADDAD,

Defendant

- Counter

Plaintiff

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration of the motion to

quash subpoena and direct the transmission of the record is GRANTED. The motion to

quash subpoena and direct transmission of the record is DENIED. The motion to waive

f

ees and costs and for miscellaneous relief is DENIED; this ruling does not affect the

Court’s earlier waiver of the defendant’s filing fee. The application for leave to appeal

the March 16, 2012 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIE D,

because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this

Court.
10007.

#### Tolliver *v.*The State.

Decided December 3, 1918.

Indictment for breaking and entering railroad-car; from Bibb superior court—Judge Mathews. July 15, 1918.

*John R. Cooper,*for plaintiff in error.

*John P. Ross, solicitor-general,*contra.

Broyles, P. J.

1. There is no material error in the excerpt,from the charge of the court, exeepted' to, when it is considered in the light of the charge as a whole.

2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth, J., concurs. Stephens, J., not presiding.*
9835.

#### May *v.*Spears.

Decided February 1, 1919.

Trover; from Colquitt superior court—Judge Thomas. May 4, 1918.

*James Humphreys, R. A. Hendricks,*for plaintiff in error.

*Parker &*Gibson, contra.

Stephens, J.

The assignments of error set forth in the motion for new trial and the admendment thereto, complaining of the ruling of the court in excluding certain testimony as therein set out and of certain excerpts from the charge of the court, are without merit. The verdict is amply supported by the- evidence, and the trial court committed no error in overruling the motion for hew trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1615

WILLIAM L. BOYD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARVIN T. RUNYON, JR., Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Joseph Robert Goodwin,

District Judge. (CA-96-725-3)

Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 8, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William L. Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Kelly Rae Rixner, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order granting the

Appellee’s motion for summary judgment, denying Appellant’s motion

for summary judgment and dismissing his action filed under the

Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-16 (West

1994 & Supp.1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion adopting the magistrate judge’s findings and

recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Boyd v. Runyon, No. CA-96-

725-3 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 14, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Benjamin Garner, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04693

Honorable John Z. Lee

Allstate Insurance Company

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, January 19, 2022:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Pursuant to the notice of

voluntary dismissal, Plaintiff dismisses this case pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(i) with

prejudice. The claims of any members of the putative, uncertified class are dismissed

without prejudice.Civil case terminated. (ca, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04693 Document #: 57 Filed: 01/19/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:264
No. 87-6694.

#### Kotyk *v.*Ward, Police Commissioner of the City of New York, et al.

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than November 26, 2014.

                    A.                     *Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis*                     (Jacquelyn K. Brunmeier, Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:                

                    1.                     *Waldo Jon Ackerman and Susan Dawn Ackerman,*                     both of Aurora, Colorado; to acquire voting shares of Olmsted Holding Corporation and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Olmsted National Bank, both of Rochester, Minnesota.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 7, 2014.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2014-26882 Filed 11-13-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 520 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 520

Congratulating Mark McGwire of the St. Louis Cardinals for breaking the 
          Major League Baseball single-season home run record.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 1998

 Mr. Talent submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Congratulating Mark McGwire of the St. Louis Cardinals for breaking the 
          Major League Baseball single-season home run record.

Whereas the game of baseball is America's national pastime;
Whereas one of the grandest records in baseball, and indeed in all sport, is the 
        record for the most home runs hit in a single Major League Baseball 
        season;
Whereas during the 1998 Major League Baseball season, Mark McGwire of the St. 
        Louis Cardinals and other fine players have challenged the Major League 
        Baseball single-season home run record, bringing great excitement to the 
        1998 Major League Baseball season and capturing the imagination of the 
        people of the United States and baseball fans around the world;
Whereas Mark McGwire of the St. Louis Cardinals has been subjected to intense 
        pressure and media scrutiny, but has conducted himself with uncommon 
        grace, class, and dignity, and has been a first-rate role model for the 
        young people of St. Louis, the State of Missouri, and the United States; 
        and
Whereas on September 8, 1998, Mark McGwire of the St. Louis Cardinals hit his 
        62nd home run of the 1998 Major League Baseball season, breaking the 
        Major League Baseball single-season home run record: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates and 
commends Mark McGwire of the St. Louis Cardinals--
            (1) for breaking the Major League Baseball single-season 
        home run record;
            (2) for bringing great excitement to the 1998 Major League 
        Baseball season; and
            (3) for being an inspiration to the youth of America and 
        the world and baseball fans everywhere.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of GE Financial
Assurance Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Fraizer, Chief Executive Officer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    MICHAEL D.
FRAIZERMichael D. Fraizer Chief Executive Officer




Date: May 2, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



15
Please use the chart below to assist when self-reporting this event to your IAPP certification account. All non-IAPP activity must be self-reported, but this 

form is meant to make the process easier for you. 

Here’s how you submit this event:

• Access your IAPP account and navigate to the CPE Submission Form: https://my.iapp.org/prog__submitceu

• Choose the appropriate certification(s) you would like to submit the CPE credits for. The “Applicable Certifications” section below is based on the 

agenda we’ve received from the event sponsor. If your certification doesn’t appear below, but you’ve attended a session that relates to your 

certification, you may submit the credits to your account.

• Enter the date of the session.

• Enter the number of CPE credits earned for the event you attended, this information is outlined in the chart below.

• Select “NonIAPP Conference or Event” on the “Professional education activity” drop-down menu.

• Enter the title of the session in the notes section if you choose, or other identifying details. 

• Hit submit! The credits are immediately added to your account. 

Still have questions? We’re here to help! Send us a note at cpe@iapp.org. 

Getting to V1.0 of the NIST Privacy Framework: Workshop #3

Event Date Event Title # CPE credits Applicable 

Certifications

Attended?

July 8-9, 2019 Getting to the V1.0 of 

the NIST Privacy 

Framework: Workshop 

#3

Boise State Student Union

1700 W University Dr.

Boise, ID 83725

Maximum CPEs: 12 credits CIPT
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 13 - 00118 - CV ENRIQUE CARNERO, APP ELLANT

V. BILLY JOE WARD, APPE LLEE On Appeal from the 251st District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 99,785 - C, Honorable Ana Estevez, Presiding



### July 19 , 2013 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. Enrique Carnero , appearing pro se, has filed a notice of appeal challenging the judgment of the trial court in his lawsuit . By letter of May 23 , 2013, we notified Carnero of two matters pertaining to his appeal requiring immediate attention. First, the filing fee was unpaid. Second, Carnero ’s notice of appeal was untimely although filed within the fifteen - day extension period authorized by appellate rule 26.3. Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. We granted Carnero ten days, on peril of dismissal, to pay the filing fee or file an affidavit of indigence and to file2

a written explanation of the need for additional time to file his notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 26.3, 42.3(a) and (c); Kidd v. Paxton , 1 S.W.3d 309 (Tex.App. — Amarillo, 1999, pet. denied). Carnero did not pay the filing fee or file an affidavit of indige nce nor did he file a writing explaining the need for additional time to file his notice of appeal. Accordingly, the appeal of Carnero is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 42.3(a) and (c). James T. Campbell Justice
9938.

#### Martin *v.*The State.

Decided November 7, 1918.

Indictment for violation of prohibition law; from Cherokee superior court—JudgeMorris. May 20, 1918.

*John S. Wood, Howell Brooke,*for plaintiff in error.

*Herbert Clay, solicitor-general,*contra.

Bloodwoeth, J.

The motion for a new trial contains the general grounds only. There is evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and this court will not interfere.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1999
<CASH>                                          34,666
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   72,171
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,476
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               107,632
<PP&E>                                          16,284
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,828
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 163,749
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,553
<BONDS>                                        109,581
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           378
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,076
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   163,749
<SALES>                                        385,863
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               385,863
<CGS>                                          340,785
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  340,785
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,238
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,345
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,495
<INCOME-TAX>                                       773
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,722
<DISCONTINUED>                                   5,225
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,947
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>THE COMPANY'S EQUITY IS NOT PUBLICLY TRADED.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                        0
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                           840,056
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                             211,371
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      1,061,427
<PP&E>                                  247,166
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        1,522,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 1,937,065
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  2,351
<OTHER-SE>                             (517,230)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          1,522,186
<SALES>                               1,914,924
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      1,914,924
<CGS>                                   912,571
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           912,571
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        976,402
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     (258,018)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (232,067)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                           (232,067)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.10)


</TABLE>