alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### William Newton *v.*Lucinda Newton.

Depositions — Postponement of Cross-Examination at the Instance of Adverse Party.

The witness was summoned by the commissioner to testify in the ease, and from the affidavit filed, it appears that the counsel for the appellant had ample time to cross-examine, and the cross-examination was postponed at his instance. The appellee was not compelled to produce the witness in order that he might be re-examined.

APPEAL PROM DAVIESS CIRCUIT COURT.

November 9, 1871.

*455
      *Ray & Hardin, for appellant.*

*Owen, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

The judgment in this case is made to conform to the commissioner’s report, and this is substantially correct, unless the testimony of the witness, Davidson, is excluded from the case. This witness was summoned by the commissioner to testify in the case and from the affidavit filed it appears that the counsel for the appellant had ample time to cross-axamine. The cross-examination was postponed at the instance of the appellant and the appellee was not compelled to produce the witness in order that he migh be re-examined. The witness had left the state and moved to Virginia at the time the cause was submitted and there was not even an affidavit filed by the appellant showing what he expected to prove by him on the 'cross-examination, nor was there any objection made to the submission of the cause for judgment. If the witness, however, had been in the county and objection made to the submission, there would still be no cause for a continuance of the case. The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1

OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

I, John M. Murphy, hereby certify that I am duly elected President of Home
Loan and Investment Bank, F.S.B., a Federal Savigns Bank, ("Home") and
further, to the best of my knowledge and after due inquiry, as follows:

1.  Home has fully complied with the provisions of Articles III and V of the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2004 (the "Agreement").

2.  A review of Home's activities as Servicer during 2004 under the Agreement
was made under my supervision.

3.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review Home has fulfilled all of
its obligations as Servicer Under the Agreement throughout the year.



In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto signed my name and affixed the seal of Home.

/s/:  John M. Murphy
John M. Murphy, President
Date:  March 15, 2005
Exhibit 13.2



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers
of Vuance Ltd. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Dated: May 9, 2012 | /s/ Mickey Ben Harush                                          
|------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|                   | By: Mickey Ben Harush                                          
|                   | Title: Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



In connection with the Annual Report of The Beacon Financial Futures Fund, L.P. (the Partnership), on form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Stratton, Chief Executive Officer of Beacon Management Corporation (USA) as General Partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



THE BEACON FINANCIAL FUTURES FUND, L.P.By: Beacon Management Corporation (USA), General Partner of the PartnershipBy:

/s/ Mark S. StrattonMark S. StrattonChief Executive OfficerApril 30, 2007




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to liability under that Section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the
Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of HMP Equity Holdings Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Kimo Esplin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|/s/J. KIMO ESPLINJ. Kimo Esplin Chief Financial OfficerMarch 28, 2005 |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
No. 87-6282.

#### Gravatt *v.*United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL DE JESUS GUERRAREGALADO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-72191

Agency No. A088-448-871

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 13, 2015** 

Before: LEAVY, CALLAHAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

Daniel De Jesus Guerra-Regalado, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for

withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture

FILED

MAY 21 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
(“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial

evidence the agency’s factual findings, Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056

(9th Cir. 2009), and we deny the petition for review. 

In support of his withholding of removal claim, Guerra-Regalado argued to

the agency that he established past persecution and a fear of future persecution

from gangs on account of his membership in three particular social groups, all

related to Guerra-Regalado’s familial ties to his gang-member uncle. The record

does not compel the conclusion that Guerra-Regalado established past persecution

or a clear probability of future persecution on account of his membership in any of

these three social groups. See Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir.

2010) (“An alien’s desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by

theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected

ground.”); see also Parussimova v. Mukasey, 555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th Cir. 2009)

(“[t]he Real ID Act requires that a protected ground represent ‘one central reason’

for an asylum applicant's persecution”). Thus, Guerra-Regalado’s withholding of

removal claim fails. 

Guerra-Regalado does not make any arguments challenging the agency’s

denial of his CAT claim. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th

2 12-72191
Cir. 1996) (“Issues raised in a brief that are not supported by argument are deemed

abandoned.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

3 12-72191
*

The Honorable Mark Bennett, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Northern District of Iowa. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-2219

___________

Monica Miller, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Northern

v. * District of Iowa.

*

Wells Dairy Inc. doing business as * [UNPUBLISHED]

Wells Blue Bunny, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: March 11, 2004

Filed: March 18, 2004

___________

Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. 

___________

PER CURIAM.

Monica Miller suffers from a knee condition that impairs her ability to climb

stairs, kneel, squat, or bend her knees. After Wells Blue Bunny terminated her

employment as a full-time quality control laboratory technician, Miller brought a

disability discrimination action against Wells. The district court*

 granted summary

judgment to Wells concluding Miller had not generated genuine issues of material
-2-

fact that would allow a jury to find she was actually disabled or perceived as disabled.

Miller v. Wells Dairy, Inc., 252 F. Supp. 2d 799, 806-11 (N.D. Iowa 2003). Miller

appeals arguing the district court committed error in deciding as a matter of law that

she did not establish a prima facie case of actual or perceived disability. Having

carefully reviewed the record and the applicable law, we conclude the district court

properly analyzed Miller’s claims and appropriately granted summary judgment.

Because we have nothing to add to the district court’s thorough analysis, we affirm

on the basis of the district court’s published opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-144846) pertaining to the Polypore International, Inc. 2006 Stock Option Plan and the Polypore International, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan of our reports
dated March 8, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Polypore International, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of Polypore International, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 2, 2010.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Charlotte,
North Carolina
March 8, 2010

---



QuickLinks
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 556

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the people of

the Republic of Mozambique and President Joaquim Alberto Chissano

are to be congratulated for their commitments to democracy, peace,

and economic reform in their country and throughout southern Africa,

and that it is in the interest of both the United States and the Republic

of Mozambique to maintain and enhance continued close relations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 25, 1998

Ms. MCKINNEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

the people of the Republic of Mozambique and President

Joaquim Alberto Chissano are to be congratulated for

their commitments to democracy, peace, and economic

reform in their country and throughout southern Africa,

and that it is in the interest of both the United States

and the Republic of Mozambique to maintain and enhance continued close relations.

Whereas United States relations with the country of Mozambique have been growing deeper and closer since President Reagan welcomed first President Somara Machel

and then his successor President Joaquim Chissano to

the White House in 1985 and 1987;
2

•HRES 556 IH

Whereas President Chissano, with United States encouragement and assistance, led his country to peace in 1992

and to its first democratic elections in 1994 and has

maintained that peace;

Whereas President Chissano from his first year in office

began a continuing reform and restructuring of the Mozambique economic system in which more than 800 state

enterprises have been privatized and which have resulted

in an environment positive for foreign investment to the

point where United States and other western firms are

on the verge of $6,000,000,000 in new investments in

Mozambique;

Whereas President Chissano has worked closely with 4 successive United States administrations in seeking peaceful

settlements to conflicts in Angola, Rhodesia/Zimbabwe,

South Africa, and most recently, the Congo; and

Whereas the United States has responded to Mozambique’s

consistent commitment to peace, democracy, and economic reform by making Mozambique one of the major

recipients of United States aid in Africa: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that—

3 (1) the United States and the Republic of Mo4 zambique should continue to advance already close

5 economic and political ties for the mutual benefit of

6 both countries and for the maintenance of peace,

7 stability, and prosperity in southern Africa;
3

•HRES 556 IH

1 (2) warmly congratulates President Joaquim

2 Chissano and the Republic of Mozambique for the

3 measures already implemented and those measures

4 it plans to implement to firmly root democracy and

5 free markets in Mozambique; and

6 (3) welcomes President Chissano in his visit to

7 the United States in November/December 1998.

Æ
FILED

June 12, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

CHARLES MONTAGUE, ) Davidson Chancery

 ) No. 96-3872-III

Plaintiff/Appellant, )

 )

VS. ) Appeal No.

 ) 01A01-9711-CH-00667

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF )

CORRECTIONS, )

 )

Defendant/Appellee, )

O R D E R

The appellant has filed a petition to rehear which has been examined and found to be

without merit. It is therefore denied.

___________________________________

HENRY F. TODD

PRESIDING JUDGE, MIDDLE SECTION

___________________________________

BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE

___________________________________

WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Airxcel, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for
the periods reflected therein.

Date: 8-12-04

By: /s/ Melvin L. Adams
    -----------------------------------
Melvin L. Adams
President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: 8-12-04

By: /s/ Richard L. Schreck
    -----------------------------------
Richard L. Schreck
Secretary/Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0001050117
<NAME>    DETAILS INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,435,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,405,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (342,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  7,226,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,251,000
<PP&E>                                      55,816,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (24,968,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              98,299,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,793,000
<BONDS>                                    100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   138,404,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                98,299,000
<SALES>                                     54,499,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            54,499,000
<CGS>                                       32,447,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,447,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,714,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,084,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,296,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,788,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,788,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
-1- 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

IN RE: TIKTOK, INC. CONSUMER 

PRIVACY LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to: 

Case No. 1:20-cv-6737 

MDL No. 2948 

Master Docket No. 20 C 4699 

Judge John Z. Lee 

Magistrate Judge Sunil R. Harjani

NOTICE OF TAG-ALONG ACTION 

Pursuant to the Court Case Management Order No. 1 (Dkt. No. 4), Defendant TikTok, Inc. 

(“TikTok”) gives notice of the following tag-along action removed to this Court: 

1. S.W., a minor, through her Guardian JASON WILLIAMS, individually and on 

behalf of similarly situated individuals, v. TikTok, Inc., and ByteDance, Inc., 

Case No. 1:20-cv-6737 (ND Ill), removed November 12, 2020. 

The action contains questions of fact and law that are common to the actions assigned to 

MDL No. 2948, and are premised on the same core issues as the other actions pending before the 

Court. See Notice of Removal filed concurrently herewith. Like the actions in this MDL, the S.W. 

action alleges violations of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”) based on 

defendants TikTok, Inc. and ByteDance, Inc.’s alleged possession of TikTok App users’ biometric 

information. Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 1, the S.W. action should therefore be 

automatically consolidated with this multidistrict litigation for pretrial purposes. See Dkt. No. 4 at ¶ 

2 (“Any ‘tag-along actions’ later filed in, removed to or transferred to this Court, or directly filed in 

the Northern District of Illinois, will automatically be consolidated with this action without the 

necessity of future motions or orders.”).

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 103 Filed: 11/12/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1841
-2- 

Dated: November 12, 2020 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 

Professional Corporation 

By: /s/ Anthony J Weibell 

Anthony J Weibell 

Curtis S. Kowalk 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Email: aweibell@wsgr.com 

ckowalk@wsgr.com 

Victor Jih 

Ryan S. Benyamin 

633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1550 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2027 

Telephone: (323) 210-2900 

Email: vjih@wsgr.com 

rbenyamin@wsgr.com 

Counsel for all Defendants

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 103 Filed: 11/12/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:1842
-3- 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on November 12, 2020, the foregoing document was filed 

electronically through the Court’s Electronic Case Filing System. Service of this document is 

being made upon all counsel of record in this case by the Notice of Electronic Filing issued 

through the Court’s Electronic Filing System on this date. 

Dated: November 12, 2020 By: /s/ Anthony J Weibell 

Anthony J Weibell 

Email: aweibell@wsgr.com 

Attorneys for all Defendants 

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 103 Filed: 11/12/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:1843
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's financial statements for the nine months ended December 31, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         272,260
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,580,193
<PP&E>                                       1,328,782
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,310,975
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,267,168
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,364
<OTHER-SE>                                     706,443
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,310,975
<SALES>                                          8,274
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,274
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,198,614
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,661,125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,847,069)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,847,069)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,847,069)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)


</TABLE>