alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of CompX  International  Inc.  (the
Company)  on Form 10-Q for the  period  ending  June 30,  2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Darryl R.
Halbert, Vice President and Controller (Chief Financial Officer) of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



/s/  Darryl R. Halbert

Darryl R. Halbert
Vice President and Controller (Chief Financial Officer)
August 14, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         2,679
<SECURITIES>                                   1,453,366
<RECEIVABLES>                                  226
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,456,271
<PP&E>                                         3,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,459,271
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          193,908
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       13,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,252,366
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,459,271
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               382,991
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (382,991)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (382,991)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (382,991)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.03)



</TABLE>
9681.

#### Wolverine Soap Company *v.*Sellers, *et al.*

Decided January 15, 1919.

Action on guaranty; from city court of Cairo—Judge Willie. November 7, 1917.

*Bell & Weathers,*for plaintiff.

*J. M. Sellers, S. P. Gain,*for defendant.

Luke, J.

This case has been here for review twice before. 13 *Ga. App.*380 (79 S. E. 246); 19 *Ga. App.*295 (91 S. E. 489). The question now raised is upon exceptions to the judgment overruling the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, which motion was based on the general grounds only. The verdict was not without evidence to support it, and, the learned trial judge having approved the verdict, it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.*
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 8 -00 153 -CV G r ac e lyn F ait h Dr ake , A ppe lla nt

v . Austin S urgical Hospi tal; F rosty D. R . Moore , M.D.; and E vere tt Bre w H ouston, M.D. , Appellees F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 353RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- GN-07- 0027 06 , HO NORAB LE ORLI NDA NARAN JO , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E MO R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Appellant Grace ly

n Fa ith Drake has filed a motion to dismiss her a ppeal. SeeTe x. R. App. P. 42.1(a)( 1). We grant the motion and dismiss the appea l. Se eid .

W. Kenneth L aw, Chief Justice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Pembe rton and Waldrop Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: May

28, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

EMOJI COMPANY GmbH, )

) Case No. 20-cv-3829

Plaintiff, ) 

)

) Judge: Gary Feinerman

v. )

)

THE INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, )

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, )

PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED )

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED )

ON SCHEDULE A HERETO, )

)

Defendants. )

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff EMOJI COMPANY 

GmbH, hereby dismisses with prejudice all causes of action in the complaint against the following 

Defendants identified in Schedule A. Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs.

No. Defendant 

140 Wenjiao666

213 eta shopping

The respective Defendants have not filed an answer to the complaint or a motion for summary 

judgment in this matter. Therefore, it is respectfully submitted that dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is 

appropriate.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: October 29, 2020 By: s/Michael A. Hierl _ 

Michael A. Hierl (Bar No. 3128021)

William B. Kalbac (Bar No. 6301771)

Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd.

Three First National Plaza

70 W. Madison Street, Suite 4000

Chicago, Illinois 60602

(312) 580-0100 Telephone

mhierl@hsplegal.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

EMOJI COMPANY GmbH

Case: 1:20-cv-03829 Document #: 47 Filed: 10/29/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:1659
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned attorney hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of 

Voluntary Dismissal was filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court and served on all counsel of 

record and interested parties via the CM/ECF system on October 29, 2020.

s/Michael A. Hierl

Case: 1:20-cv-03829 Document #: 47 Filed: 10/29/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:1660
Exhibit 32.1





Section 1350
Certification


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code),
each of the undersigned officers of Symmetry Medical Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Corporation"), does hereby certify that:





The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2010 (the
"Form 10-K") of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.





Dated:    March
5, 2010


/s/  BRIAN
      S. MOOREBrian
      S. Moore
              Chief
      Executive Officer/s/  FRED
      L. HITEFred
      L. Hite
              Chief
      Financial Officer
Summary of Revised Executive Bonus Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 Summary of Revised Executive Bonus Plan 
  
 On July 25, 2005, the Company’s board of directors, in response to changes in the method used to calculate awards under the
Executive Bonus Plan of Alfa Mutual Insurance Company (AMI) adopted the amended method approved by AMI. A portion of executive bonuses are allocated to the Company under a Management and Operating Agreement among the Alfa companies. 

 
 Under the plan, bonuses are based upon a combination of individual bonus goals and
corporate performance. These factors are weighted based on an individual’s position in the organization, with corporate performance weighted more heavily for the more senior positions. Under the prior plan, the corporate performance
calculation was based on a matrix which plotted the total life and property and casualty premium growth against the Company’s combined ratio, factored by a multiplier based upon Alfa’s ROE compared to a predetermined peer group. Under
the revised plan, the individual bonus goal portion will remain unchanged. However, the corporate bonus calculation will be revised so that the performance of the P & C business and life business will be considered separately. This
includes a change in the peer group companies to include P & C companies which more closely match Alfa’s P & C business. With regard to the P & C portion of the calculation, it will continue to be based on a matrix plotting P
& C premium growth versus the Company’s P & C combined ratio, with a multiplier determined by Alfa’s ROE ranking among the revised peer group. The life calculation will reflect life premium growth as compared to the life
company expense ratio, factored by a multiplier based upon the achievement by the life company of its interest spread target. The interest spread target will be set at the first of each year. The P & C calculation and the life calculation
will then be weighted to achieve a single, overall corporate performance number. In each of the prior four years, the resulting bonuses paid under the revised bonus calculation would have been less than that paid under the previous
calculation. The revised bonus calculation will be effective when the bonuses for 2006 are calculated.
EXHIBIT 12.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
		OFFICER

I, Erik H. Martin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on
		Form 20-F of Northwestern Mineral Ventures Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report
		does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
		material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
		circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
		respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
		statements, and other financial information included in this annual report,
		fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
		operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
		presented in this annual report;

4. The registrants other certifying
		officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
		controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
		15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and
		procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
		under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
		registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
		others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
		report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the
		Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
		our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
		procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
		evaluation;

c. Disclosed in this report any change in
		the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
		during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or
		is reasonably





---



likely to materially affect the
		registrants internal control over financial reporting;

5. The Companys other certifying
		officer and I have disclosed, based upon our most recent evaluation of internal
		controls over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit
		committee of the Companys board of directors:

(a)
			 All significant deficiencies and
				  material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
				  financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
				  Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
				  information; and


(b)
			 Any fraud, whether or not material,
				  that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
				  Companys internal control over financial reporting.




Date: June 25th, 2007
			 
			 
			 /s/ Erik H. MartinErik H. MartinChief Financial Officer






---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04699

Honorable John Z. Lee

TikTok Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, April 5, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: In light of the recent filings, the

status and motion hearing on Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary approval of class action

settlement [122] is continued to 4/19/21 at 3:00 p.m. via Microsoft Teams. The call−in

information shall remain the same. Mailed notice (sxw)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 146 Filed: 04/05/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:3002
Michael Hind – IBM Research

ML vs traditional SW evaluations

▪ Correctness? 

▪ Testing corner cases w/o knowing the corners

▪ Focus on risks

– Bias, adversarial robustness, 

explainability, uncertainty, privacy, 

generalizability, data quality, etc.

➔ Transparency

Experiences with enterprises

▪ Large variation

▪ AI Governance emerging

Most useful evaluation outputs

▪ Evaluation is an abstraction of efficacy

▪ Know your concerns, consumers

▪ Don’t measure what is easy, measure what matters

My passion

▪ AI FactSheets: aifs360.mybluemix.net

–Templates, methodology, automatic collection

▪ Open source tools

– aif360.mybluemix.net (Fairness)

– aix360.mybluemix.net (Explainability)

– art360.mybluemix.net (Adversarial Robustness)

– uq360.mybluemix.net (Uncertainty Quantification)
**Exhibit 13.13**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Inmarsat Launch Company Limited (the“Company”) for the annual period ended December 31, 2005 (the “Periodic Report”), I, Andrew Sukawaty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained inthe Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Date: April 28, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  financial  information extracted from the consolidated
financial  statements  of  Cavalry  Bancorp,  Inc.  for  the  nine  months ended
September  30,  2000  and  is  qualified  in  its  entirety by reference to such
financial  statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>     0001049535
<NAME>     CAVALRY BANCORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>     1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      16,262
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      22,673
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 27,108
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         613
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           604
<LOANS>                                    285,923
<ALLOWANCE>                                  4,156
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             374,935
<DEPOSITS>                                 328,418
<SHORT-TERM>                                   526
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,274
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,066
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    11,402
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,249
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             374,935
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             19,199
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,142
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             1,376
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            21,717
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           9,311
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,471
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       12,246
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  141
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             11,043
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,321
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   5,321
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,108
<EPS-BASIC>                                 0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0.49
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                4.96
<LOANS-NON>                                    585
<LOANS-PAST>                                     0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              3,172
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             4,136
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  143
<RECOVERIES>                                    22
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            4,156
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         4,156
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          0



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 566 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 20, 1998.
Whereas the water resources of the Great Lakes Basin are precious public natural 
        resources, shared and held in trust by the Great Lakes States and the 
        Canadian Provinces;
Whereas the Great Lakes need to be carefully managed and protected in order to 
        meet current and future water needs within the Great Lakes Basin and the 
        Canadian Provinces;
Whereas any new diversions of Great Lakes waters for use outside of the Great 
        Lakes Basin will have significant adverse effects on the environment, 
        economy, and welfare of the Great Lakes region;
Whereas the Province of Ontario, Canada, has authorized an Ontario company to 
        divert water from the Great Lakes for sale to Asia;
Whereas 4 of the Great Lakes contain international waters, and are defined as 
        ``boundary waters'' in the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 between the 
        United States and Canada, and therefore any new diversion of Great Lakes 
        water would affect the relations between the Government of the United 
        States and the Government of Canada;
Whereas as trustees of the Great Lakes Basin's natural resources, the Great 
        Lakes States and Provinces have a shared duty to protect, conserve, and 
        manage the renewable but finite waters of the Great Lakes Basin for the 
        use, benefit, and enjoyment of all their citizens, and future 
        generations; and
Whereas the most effective means of protecting, conserving, and managing the 
        water resources of the Great Lakes is through the joint pursuit of 
        unified and cooperative principles, policies, and programs mutually 
        agreed upon, enacted, and adhered to by each and every Great Lakes State 
        and Province: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the President and the Senate should act to prevent the sale or 
diversion of Great Lakes water to foreign countries, businesses, 
corporations, and individuals until procedures are established to 
guarantee that any such sale or diversion is fully negotiated and 
approved by representatives of the United States Government and the 
Government of Canada, in consultation with any Great Lakes State or 
Province that could be impacted by such a sale or diversion.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Staley, Appellant, *v.*Kreinbihl et al., Exrs., Appellees.

(No. 376

Decided February 14, 1949.)

*Mr. Roy Warren Roof,*for appellant.

*Mr. Paul T. Mahon*and *Mr. Oren E Dichas on,*for appellees.

Fess, J.

On November 6, 1948, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal from this court to the Supreme Court of Ohio from a judgment, entered in this court after a trial *de novo*herein. On the same day, but after the filing of plaintiff’s notice of appeal, the defendants filed a notice of cross-appeal in this court to the Supreme Court. Plaintiff filed a motion to strike the notice of cross-appeal from the files for the reason that no statute or rule of this court provides for the filing and perfecting of cross-appeals from this court to the Supreme Court. However, the right of appeal can be determined only by the court or tribunal to which the appeal is sought to be taken. *State, ex rel. Cleveland, A. & C. Ry. Co.,*v. *Glasgo, Aud.,*105 Ohio St., 225, 137 N. E., 35. The motion to strike is therefore overruled without prejudice to the plaintiff to raise the question in the Supreme Court.

*Motion overruled.*

Conn, P. J., and Carpenter, J., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                             NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Novellus Systems, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 27, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kevin S. Royal, Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

Date: May 5, 2004                       By: /s/ Kevin S. Royal
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Kevin S. Royal
                                            Vice President and Chief
                                            Financial Officer