alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-02-00093-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	MARCH 19, 2002, 

	______________________________

	RESHAWN L. JOHNSON,

			Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

			Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 364TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 97-424,513; HON. BRADLEY S. UNDERWOOD, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J, QUINN, REAVIS and JOHNSON, J.J.

	Reshawn L. Johnson, (Johnson), a current inmate with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ), filed a notice of appeal on February 21, 2002.  However, Johnson did not pay the $125 filling fee required from appellants pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 5.  Nor did he (at the time he noticed his appeal) file an affidavit pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1 relieving him of his duty to do so.  By letter from this Court dated February 25, 2002, we informed appellant that “[u]nless the filing fee in the amount of $125.00 is paid . . . [his] appeal will be subject to dismissal.  Tex. 

R. App. P. 42.3(c); See Holt v. F. F. Enterprises, 990 S.W.2d 756 (Tex. App.--Amarillo 1998, pet. ref’d.).  

	In apparent response to our February letter, the court received from Johnson a document entitled Affidavit of Indigency In Lieu of Cost Bond, wherein he represented that he was an indigent.  Yet, the affidavit does not comport with the requirements of an affidavit of indigence specified under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1(b).  Nor was it filed within the deadlines set by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1(c)(1) (establishing the deadline by which one must request leave to proceed as a pauper) and 20.1(c)(3) (establishing the deadline by which one must seek leave to extend the deadline contemplated under 20.1(c)(1)).  Nor was it accompanied by any motion for leave to extend either of those deadlines.   Thus, we conclude that appellant’s Affidavit of Indigency is ineffective to relieve him from his obligation to pay the aforementioned filing fee.    

	Due to appellant’s failure to pay the filing fee, we dismiss the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3 (c). 

                                                               				Per Curiam

Do not publish.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the quarter ended
9/30/00 for DigiTEC 2000, Inc. and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,065,055
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,012,964
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        331,509
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,569,330
<PP&E>                                             127,748
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,922,011
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,593,143
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                             61
<COMMON>                                             7,059
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,922,011
<SALES>                                          8,874,653
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,874,653
<CGS>                                            7,798,496
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,712,311
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   164,132
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 191,119
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,001,790)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,001,790)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,001,790)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.14)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 of BrightStar Information Technology
Group, Inc. (the "Form 10-QSB"), I, Brian Burnett, Chief Executive Officer, of
BrightStar Information Technology Group, Inc., certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   such Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 fully
            complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
            Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in such Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
            period ended March 31, 2006 fairly presents, in all material
            respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
            BrightStar Information Technology Group, Inc.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to BrightStar
Information Technology Group, Inc. and will be retained by BrightStar
Information Technology Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: May 15, 2006                        BY:    /s/ Brian S. Burnett
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Brian S. Burnett
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

                                       20
l){/LL,� {(. 

'mlniteb �tates !!lepartment of C!Commerce 

Jllattonal 3Jnstttute of �tanbarlls anb �etbnologp 

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For:

Connecticut 

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international system of units (SI), documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully 

completed training and proficiency tests, documented calibration intervals, submitted a quality management system, and 

demonstrated suitable measurement assu,rance for the Scope listed on this certificate. 

The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State 

Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2005. 

- ·scope

Mass Echelon Ill Volume Transfer,.11 

25 kgto"l mg 5gal 

2020 

1000 lb to 0.001 lb 

8 oz to 0.03125 oz aA n-.. "T. Douglas A. Olson, Chief Wheel Load Weighers NIST Office of Weights and Measures 

40 000 lb to 10 000 lb 

Effective Dales: 2020-02-01 to 2021-02-01 

(Rev.: March 2013)
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 219 (Thursday, November 13, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67530-67531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26901]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8946]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Picturing Mary: Woman, Mother, Idea'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as

[[Page 67531]]

appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I 
hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition 
``Picturing Mary: Woman, Mother, Idea,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at the National Museum of Women in 
the Arts, Washington, DC, from on or about December 5, 2014, until on 
or about April 12, 2015, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: November 4, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-26901 Filed 11-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### Attorney General, relator v. Louisa V. Hane.

*Appeals*— Secui'ity *for costs*— Proceedings *to abate nuisamces.*

An appeal in equity cannot be taken to the Supreme Court unless some one appears, on the record, as responsible to the adverse party for costs.

The Attorney General has no authority, unless in extraordinary cases, to proceed at his own instance as relator for the State, to sue. a private person by information in chancery to abate a mill-dam on the ground of its being hurtful to health; such a case should be prosecuted, if at all, by the public, and submitted to a jury.

Appeal from Clinton. (Y. H. Smith, J.)

April 18.

April 25.

Information in equity. Informant appeals.

Dismissed.

Attorney General *Jacob J. Van Riper, C. J. Willett*and *Benton Hanchett*for informant.

The Attorney General may file an information in equity to abate a public nuisance: 2 Story’s Eq. Jur. §§ 922-3; High on Inj. §§ 522-6; Angeli on Watercourses § 565; *State v. Franklin Falls Co.*6 Amer. 513; *Att'y Gen. v. Forbes*2 Myl. *&*C. 123; *Davis v. Mayor, etc.*14 N. Y. 526; *People v. Vanderbilt*38 Barb. 287; *Att'y Gen. v. Evart Booming Co.*34 Mich. 472.

*A. Stout*for respondent.

Per Curiam.

This is an information in equity to abate a mill-dam as injurious to the public health. It purports to be on the sole intervention of the Attorney General, though prosecuted apparently by private counsel. The defendant pleaded to the jurisdiction, and the court below allowed the plea and dismissed the information.

The Attorney General appealed. The case has proceeded without any relator responsible for costs, and no security has been given on appeal, and no one appears here to represent the State.

*448We are not aware of any' precedent for this practice. So far as we know, no case in equity can be appealed to this Court without some one on the record to be responsible to the other party for the costs. ‘

But the proceeding suggests further thought. The case must exhibit very remarkable features to authorize the Attorney General to proceed as relator for the State at his own instance, and by information in chancery sue a private person to abate a mill-dam on the ground of its being hurtful to health.

As a general rule the public must prosecute in such a case, if at all, at the common law and afford the defendant an opportunity to have the question decided by a jury, and the facts must be extraordinary to admit of a departure.

"We see nothing here to justify a transfer of the jurisdiction.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit No. 99.1

TRUSTEE STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

I, David
J. Kolibachuk, acting on behalf of U.S. Bank Trust National Association (the Trustee), hereby certify that the Trustee has fulfilled its obligations as trustee under the trust agreement, dated May 20, 2004, between Corporate Asset
Backed Corporation, as depositor, and the Trustee, with respect to the CABCO Series 2004-101 Trust (Goldman Sachs Capital I) during the period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014.

Date: February 17, 2015



U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee ofCABCO Series 2004-101 Trust (Goldman Sachs Capital I)By:

/s/ David J. KolibachukName: David J. KolibachukTitle: Vice President
Entity
    
    Jurisdiction1. Trim Systems, Inc.
    
    Delaware2. Trim Systems Operating Corp.
    
    Delaware3. CVG International Holdings, Inc.
    
    Barbados4. CVG Vehicle Components (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
    
    China5. CVS Holdings Limited
    
    United Kingdom6. Commercial Vehicle Systems Limited
    
    United Kingdom7. Bostrom Limited
    
    United Kingdom8. Bostrom Investments Limited
    
    United Kingdom9. KAB Seating, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware10. Bostrom International Limited
    
    United Kingdom11. KAB Seating AB
    
    Sweden12. KAB Seating PTY. LTD.
    
    Australia13. KAB Seating SA
    
    Belgium14. National Seating Company
    
    Delaware15. KAB Seating Limited
    
    United Kingdom16. A. Stokes Pressings Limited
    
    United Kingdom17. Wilton & Co. Pressings Limited
    
    United Kingdom




---



##### 



Entity
    
    Jurisdiction18. Bostrom Specialist Engineering Limited
    
    United Kingdom19. Winston Cable Limited
    
    United Kingdom20. JMH Limited
    
    United Kingdom21. KAB Tooling Limited
    
    United Kingdom22. Bostrom Europe
    
    United Kingdom23. The C&P Jig & Tool Limited
    
    United Kingdom24. BB Seating Limited
    
    United Kingdom25. Palmer & Shelley Limited
    
    United Kingdom26. AJW Holdings Limited
    
    United Kingdom27. KAB Industries Limited
    
    United Kingdom28. Corvus Suspension Products Limited
    
    United Kingdom29. KAB Pressings Limited
    
    United Kingdom30. KAB Components Limited
    
    United Kingdom31. AJ Williams Small Pressings Limited
    
    United Kingdom32. Bostrom Vehicle Components Limited
    
    United Kingdom33. Inbark Limited
    
    United Kingdom34. KAB Engineering Limited
    
    United Kingdom35. CVS Holdings, Inc.
    
    Delaware36. Sprague Devices, Inc.
    
    Delaware37. CVG Management Corporation
    
    Delaware38. CVG Logistics, LLC
    
    Delaware




---



##### 



Entity
    
    Jurisdiction39. Mayflower Vehicle Systems, LLC
    
    Delaware40. T.S. Mexico S. de R. L. de C.V.
    
    Mexico41. Monona Corporation
    
    Delaware42. Monona Wire Corporation
    
    Iowa43. Monona (Mexico) Holdings LLC
    
    Illinois44. MWC de Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V.
    
    Mexico45. EMD Servicious, S.A. de C.V.
    
    Mexico46. Cabarrus Plastics, Inc.
    
    North Carolina47. CVG European Holdings, LLC
    
    Delaware48. CVG International GP
    
    Bermuda49. C.I.E.B. Kahovec, spol. s.r.o.
    
    Czech Republic50. CVG Czech Management, s.r.o.
    
    Czech Republic51. CVG Global s.a.r.l.
    
    Luxembourg52. CVG Czech I s.r.o.
    
    Czech Republic53. PEKM Kabeltechnik s.r.o.
    
    Czech Republic54. Prettl MKRT Ukraine LLC
    
    Ukraine55. CVG Oregon, LLC
    
    Delaware56. CVG CS LLC
    
    Delaware57. CVG CS S. de R.L. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
Exhibit 10.12

Annual Cash Compensation of Executive Officers

Base Salaries and 2009 Bonus Payments. The executive officers of Stereotaxis, Inc. (the Company) have their base salaries determined yearly by the Compensation Committee (the Committee) of the Board of
Directors. The executive officers are all at will employees, and each have written employment agreements which are filed, as required, as exhibits to reports filed by the Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On
February 17, 2010, the Compensation Committee determined the 2010 annual salaries for executive officers of the Company and that payments would be made under the Companys 2009 bonus program (the 2009 Program) to the executive
officers of the Company as set forth below. The 2009 Program was designed to reward the accomplishments of these officers on behalf of the Company in 2009 pursuant to and consistent with the objective of the Companys bonus plan, as determined
by the Committee. The 2010 salaries and 2009 bonuses are summarized in the following table:



|                                                                       |  |             |         |            |   |       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------- | ------- | ---------- | - | ------
|                                                                       |  | 2010 Salary |         | 2009 Bonus
|Douglas Bruce Chief Technology/Operations Officer                      |  | $           | 320,000 |            | $ | 36,367
|Daniel J. Johnston Chief Financial Officer (1)                         |  | $           | 320,000 |            | $ | 9,067 
|Michael Kaminski President & Chief Executive Officer                   |  | $           | 400,000 |            | $ | 45,334
|Louis Ruggiero Chief Commercial Officer (2)                            |  |             | N/A     |            | $ | 8,338 
|James Stolze Vice President & Chief Financial Officer (1)              |  |             | N/A     |            | $ | 35,134
|Melissa Walker Senior Vice President, Regulatory, Quality & Compliance |  | $           | 235,000 |            | $ | 8,523 



|(1) | Mr. Stolze served as the Companys Vice President & Chief Financial Officer through November 15, 2009, at which point Mr. Johnston began
serving as the Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Stolze retired effective December 31, 2009.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Mr. Ruggiero retired as the Companys Chief Commercial Officer as of December 31, 2009.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Company intends to provide additional information regarding other compensation awarded to the named executive officers in respect of and
during the 2009 fiscal year in the proxy statement for its 2010 annual meeting of stockholders, which is expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in April 2010.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

THE ESTATE OF ROBERT J. HILTON,

deceased,

Plaintiff,

v.

SECURIAN LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, and PAULA M. 

OBUCHOWSKI,

 Defendants.

SECURIAN LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

 Counterplaintiff / 

 Third Party Plaintiff,

 v.

PAULA M. OBUCHOWSKI, JUSTIN R. 

HILTON, and KRYSTAL R. HILTON, 

individually and as the Independent 

Administrator of the ESTATE OF 

ROBERT J. HILTON

Case No. 1:20-CV-04022

Judge John F. Kness

Magistrate Judge Beth W. Jantz

STIPULATION TO DISMISS

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the Parties hereby jointly 

stipulate to the dismissal of this action.

1. The Parties have reached a settlement of all claims.

2. The Financial Office of the United States District Court for the Northern District 

of Illinois has completed all disbursements contemplated by the Parties’ settlement.

Case: 1:20-cv-04022 Document #: 60 Filed: 08/18/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:326
2

3. There remains nothing pending for this Court’s consideration other than dismissal 

of the action.

WHEREFORE, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this matter is 

hereby dismissed with prejudice.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: 

Attorneys for Justin R. Hilton and 

Krystal R. Hilton

Brandon Peck (Lead Trial Attorney)

Peter M. Brady

Peck Ritchey, LLC

321 S. Plymouth Ct., 6th Floor

Chicago, IL 60604

Phone: (312) 201-0900

Email: bpeck@peckritchey.com

Email: pbrady@peckritchey.com

By: /s/ Brandon Peck

Brandon Peck

Attorneys for Paula M. Obuchowski

Patrick M. Griffin (Lead Counsel)

Kristin N. Suchy

Griffin Williams McMahon & Walsh, LLP

21 N. 4th St.

Geneva, IL 60134

Phone: (630) 524-2566

Email: pgriffin@gwmwlaw.com

Email: ksuchy@gwmwlaw.com

By: /s/ Patrick M. Griffin

Patrick M. Griffin

Case: 1:20-cv-04022 Document #: 60 Filed: 08/18/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:327
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       100,716,387
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              130,716387
<CASH>                                      53,083,244
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                          67,400,000
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       3,582,274
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             265,648,722
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             90,500,000
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            785,685
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      127,993,011
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       280,057
<OTHER-SE>                                  42,050,739
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               265,648,722
<PREMIUMS>                                   3,082,046
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          1,571,501
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             151,566
<OTHER-INCOME>                               1,145,259
<BENEFITS>                                     300,000
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    148,138
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,128,012
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,128,012
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,128,012
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.38)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              90,200,000
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            300,000
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                           90,500,000
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             90,500,000
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>