alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
9531.

#### Farmers Supply Company *v.*Smith.

Decided October 16, 1918.

Rehearing denied January 14, 1919.

Complaint; from city court of Yaldosta—Judge Cranford. January 18, 1918.

*John J. Murry, E. K. Wilcox,*for plaintiff.

*John P. Knight, Dan R. Bruce,*for defendant.

Luke, J.

1. A conveyance of realty in the form of an absolute fee-simple deed can be shown by parol evidence to be only a security deed, where the grantor, after making the deed', retains possession of the realty conveyed. *Askew*v. *Thompson,*129 *Ga.*325 (58 S. E. 854); *Spencer*v. *Schuman,*132 *Ga.*515 (64 S. E. 466). See also *Pusser*v. *Thompson,*132 *Ga.*280-284 (64 S. E. 75, 22 L. R. A. (N. S.) 571.

2. The charge of the court fully and fairly presented the issues to the jury. For none of the reasons assigned did the judge err in charging the jury.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.*
SUBROUTINE CAUPPF(P,PPF)
C
C     PURPOSE--THIS SUBROUTINE COMPUTES THE PERCENT POINT
C              FUNCTION VALUE FOR THE CAUCHY DISTRIBUTION
C              WITH MEDIAN = 0 AND 75% POINT = 1. 
C              THIS DISTRIBUTION IS DEFINED FOR ALL X AND HAS
C              THE PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION
C              F(X) = (1/PI)*(1/(1+X*X)).
C              NOTE THAT THE PERCENT POINT FUNCTION OF A DISTRIBUTION 
C              IS IDENTICALLY THE SAME AS THE INVERSE CUMULATIVE
C              DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION OF THE DISTRIBUTION.
C     INPUT  ARGUMENTS--P      = THE SINGLE PRECISION VALUE 
C                                (BETWEEN 0.0 AND 1.0)
C                                AT WHICH THE PERCENT POINT 
C                                FUNCTION IS TO BE EVALUATED.
C     OUTPUT ARGUMENTS--PPF    = THE SINGLE PRECISION PERCENT
C                                POINT FUNCTION VALUE.
C     OUTPUT--THE SINGLE PRECISION PERCENT POINT
C             FUNCTION VALUE PPF.
C     PRINTING--NONE UNLESS AN INPUT ARGUMENT ERROR CONDITION EXISTS. 
C     RESTRICTIONS--P SHOULD BE BETWEEN 0.0 AND 1.0, EXCLUSIVELY.
C     OTHER DATAPAC   SUBROUTINES NEEDED--NONE.
C     FORTRAN LIBRARY SUBROUTINES NEEDED--SIN, COS.
C     MODE OF INTERNAL OPERATIONS--SINGLE PRECISION.
C     LANGUAGE--ANSI FORTRAN. 
C     REFERENCES--FILLIBEN, SIMPLE AND ROBUST LINEAR ESTIMATION
C                 OF THE LOCATION PARAMETER OF A SYMMETRIC
C                 DISTRIBUTION (UNPUBLISHED PH.D. DISSERTATION,
C                 PRINCETON UNIVERSITY), 1969, PAGES 21-44, 229-231.
C               --FILLIBEN, 'THE PERCENT POINT FUNCTION',
C                 (UNPUBLISHED MANUSCRIPT), 1970, PAGES 28-31.
C               --JOHNSON AND KOTZ, CONTINUOUS UNIVARIATE
C                 DISTRIBUTIONS--1, 1970, PAGES 154-165.
C     WRITTEN BY--JAMES J. FILLIBEN
C                 STATISTICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY (205.03)
C                 NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS
C                 WASHINGTON, D. C. 20234
C                 PHONE:  301-921-2315
C     ORIGINAL VERSION--JUNE      1972. 
C     UPDATED         --SEPTEMBER 1975. 
C     UPDATED         --NOVEMBER  1975. 
C
C---------------------------------------------------------------------
C
      DATA PI/3.14159265358979/
C
      IPR=6
C
C     CHECK THE INPUT ARGUMENTS FOR ERRORS
C
      IF(P.LE.0.0.OR.P.GE.1.0)GOTO50
      GOTO90
   50 WRITE(IPR,1)
      WRITE(IPR,46)P
      RETURN
   90 CONTINUE
    1 FORMAT(1H ,115H***** FATAL ERROR--THE FIRST  INPUT ARGUMENT TO THE
     1 CAUPPF SUBROUTINE IS OUTSIDE THE ALLOWABLE (0,1) INTERVAL *****)
   46 FORMAT(1H , 35H***** THE VALUE OF THE ARGUMENT IS ,E15.8,6H *****)
C
C-----START POINT-----------------------------------------------------
C
      ARG=PI*P
      PPF=-COS(ARG)/SIN(ARG)
C
      RETURN
      END
Exhibit 8.1
 Subsidiaries.
 
    
    eLongNet Information Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., a PRC company.
 
    
    Bravado Investments Limited, a British Virgin Islands company.
 
    
    Shanghai Xinwang Computer Technology Co., Ltd., a PRC company.
 Variable Interest Entities:
 
    
    Beijing eLong Information Technology Co., Ltd., a PRC company.
 
    
    Beijing eLong Air Services Co., Ltd., a PRC company.
 
    
    Beijing eLong International Travel Co., Ltd., a PRC company.
 
    
    Beijing Asia Media Interactive Advertising Co. Ltd., Ltd., a PRC company.
 
    
    Beijing Xici Interactive Information Technology Co. Ltd., Ltd., a PRC company.
 
    
    Hangzhou eLong Air Service Co., Ltd., a PRC company.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of SmartPros Ltd. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Allen S. Greene, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.



/s/ ALLEN S. GREENE
-------------------------------
Allen S. Greene
Chief Executive Officer

March 27, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Highway Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), North Dakota Department of Transportation (NDDOT), DOT.

# ACTION:

Rescind Notice of Intent.

# SUMMARY:

                        The FHWA is issuing this revised notice to advise the public that FHWA and NDDOT will not prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a proposed highway project in Grand Forks County, North Dakota and Polk County, Minnesota. A Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on May 17, 2013.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sheri G. Lares, Environmental Program Manager and Planning Specialist, Federal Highway Administration, North Dakota Division Office, 4503 Coleman Street, Suite 205, Bismarck, North Dakota 58503, Telephone: (701) 221-9464. Terry Udland, Bridge Division, North Dakota Department of Transportation, 608 E. Boulevard Avenue, Bismarck, North Dakota 58505-0700, Telephone: (701) 328-1969.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The FHWA, in cooperation with the North Dakota and Minnesota Departments of Transportation, had proposed to prepare an EIS on a proposal to rehabilitate or replace the historic Sorlie Bridge over the Red River between Grand Forks, ND and East Grand Forks, MN. After further analysis of the bridge condition, it was determined that rehabilitation alternatives and replacement alternatives to be evaluated in the EIS for the structure were not warranted. Preliminary alternatives that will be analyzed through a Categorical Exclusion include various degrees of maintenance of the existing bridge.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, Highway Research, Planning, and Construction. The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)

Issued on: November 6, 2014.

Wendall L. Meyer,

Division Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, North Dakota Division Office.

[FR Doc. 2014-27104 Filed 11-14-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
No. 87-1483.

#### Teng *v.*Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Deniven Dupree Bell v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 7

- 00 526

- CR

Trial court case number: A

- 1 6

- 0 8 2 2

- SB

Trial court: 51st District Court of Tom Green County

The State’s Exhibit 1, “ Audio Disk ,” and State’s Exhibit 2, “Audio Disk,” w ere

admitted into evidence at trial in the above case. This Court requests the Tom Green

County District Clerk or the court reporter, if the exhibit s are still in his or her possession,

to send the original of State’s Exhibit 1 , “Audio Disk,” and State Exhibit 2 , “ Audio

Disk ,” to this Court. The Clerk of this Court is directed to cooperate wi th the district

clerk and/or court reporter to provide for the safekeeping, transportation, and return of

such exhibit. See T EX

. R. A PP P. 34.6( g )(2).

The exhibit s are due in this Court no later than 1 4 days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 8, 2018
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1


                          [BANK OF NEW YORK LETTERHEAD]

                                BANK OF NEW YORK

                              Officer's Certificate

                          -----------------------------
                                February 21, 2006



MERRILL LYNCH DEPOSITOR, INC.
North Tower, 7th Floor
4 World Financial Center
New York, New York 10080

              PREFERREDPLUS, PPLUS TRUST AND INDEXPLUS CERTIFICATE

The undersigned, Thomas J. Bogert, the Vice President-Manager of The Bank of New
York, a New York corporation (the "Trustee"), hereby certifies in such capacity
that, based on his knowledge, the Trustee has complied, in all material
respects, with all conditions and covenants applicable to the Trustee under the
Standard Terms for Trust Agreements dated February 20, 1998 between Merrill
Lynch Depositor, Inc. as depositor (the "Depositor") and the Trustee, as
successor to United States Trust Company of New York, as trustee and securities
intermediary (the "Securities Intermediary"), in each case as amended by a
series supplement between the Depositor, the Trustee and the Securities
Intermediary for each series of trust certificates listed in the attached
schedule.




                                    Very truly yours,

                                    BANK OF NEW YORK


                                    By: /s/ Thomas J. Bogert
                                        ------------------------
                                    Name:  Thomas J. Bogert
                                    Title: Vice President


<PAGE>

                                   SCHEDULE


Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 HLT-1 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 TRV-C1 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1999 REN-C1 Trust
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CCR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLS-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ATT-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series NAI-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series FRD-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series LMG-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CZN-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CTR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series LMG-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ALL-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLC-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ELP-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series MSD-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series VER-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series UPC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series FAR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series GEC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series GRC-1
PPLUS Trust Series PMC-1
PPLUS Trust Series VAL-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSG-1
PPLUS Trust Series FMC-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSG-2
PPLUS Trust Series DCC-1
PPLUS Trust Series CSF-1
PPLUS Trust Series SPR-1
PPLUS Trust Series TWC-1
PPLUS Trust Series CMT-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSC-1
PPLUS Trust Series DCNA-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSC-2
PPLUS Trust Series JPM-1
PPLUS Trust Series LMG-3
INDEXPLUS Trust 2003-1


                                       2
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

	NO. 2-03-173-CV

IN RE BERT HUGHES GIBBS, 						   RELATOR

A SOVEREIGN, A LIVING MAN

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator's petition for writ of habeas corpus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied with prejudice.  Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied with prejudice.

	Relator shall pay all costs incurred in this proceeding.

	The clerk of this court is directed to transmit a copy of this opinion to the relator, attorneys of record, the trial court judge, and the trial court clerk.

	DATED June 17, 2003.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL B:	LIVINGSTON, DAY, and WALKER, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

IN RE: TIKTOK, INC., 

CONSUMER PRIVACY LITIGATION, 

This Document Relates to: 

Bravo v. TikTok, Inc. 23-cv-00225 

Murphy v. TikTok, Inc. 23-cv-00504 

Buckley v. TikTok, Inc. 23-cv-00841 

Tado v. TikTok, Inc. 23-cv-01430 

Recht v. TikTok, Inc. 23-cv-02248 

Fleming v. TikTok, Inc. 23-cv-02260 

E.K. v. TikTok, Inc. 23-cv-02262 

Androshchuk v. TikTok, Inc. 23-cv-02462 

Albaran v. TikTok, Inc. 23-cv-02463 

G.R. v. TikTok, Inc. 23-cv-02464 

Moody v. TikTok, Inc. 23-cv-02465 

Schulte v. TikTok, Inc. 23-cv-02466 

Fugok v. TikTok, Inc. 23-cv-02467 

MDL Docket No. 2948 

Master Docket No.: 1:20-cv-04699 

Hon. Rebecca R. Pallmeyer 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE RE: IN-APP BROWSER PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO 

DISMISSAL OF THE IN-APP BROWSER CLAIMS ON THE BASIS OF THE 

BIOMETRIC DATA SETTLEMENT

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 312 Filed: 08/14/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:14112
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

In compliance with Rule 5.5(a) of Local Rules, I hereby certify that a true and correct

copy of In-App Browser Plaintiffs’ Opposition To Dismissal Of The In-App Browser Claims On

The Basis Of The Biometric Data Settlement and the Declaration of Roland Tellis with exhibits 

thereto, was electronically filed via CM/ECF and was served on all parties via CM/ECF on 

August 11, 2023. A true and correct copy of the same was served via United States first-class 

mail, postage prepaid, on August 14, 2023, upon the following: 

Douyin Ltd. a/k/a ByteDance Ltd.

Room 503 5F Building 2 

43 North Third Ring West Road 

Beijing, 100086 China

Dated: August 14, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/Roland Tellis

BARON & BUDD, P.C.

Roland Tellis

rtellis@baronbudd.com 

Sterling Cluff

scluff@baronbudd.com 

David Fernandes 

dfernandes@baronbudd.com 

Jay Lichter

jlichter@baronbudd.com 

Shannon Royster 

sroyster@baronbudd.com 

15910 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1600 

Encino, CA 91436 

Telephone: 818-839-2333 

Facsimile: 818-986-9698

Counsel for Plaintiff 

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 312 Filed: 08/14/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:14113
#### Vladimir KIRAKOSYAN, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-72085.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 6, 2004.*

Decided Dec. 10, 2004.

Alan Aghabegian, Law Offices of Alan Aghabegian, Glendale, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Lagu*565na Niguel, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, James A. Hunolt, Esq., Teresa L. Donovan, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Vladimir Kirakosyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming without opinion the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the IJ’s adverse credibility finding for substantial evidence. Far*ah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination because Kirakosyan testified that he was sought by the police because of his interview with an Armenian radio journalist, his “written testimonies” about military wrongdoing, and his statement that the death of a military phot was not accidental. However, Kirakosyan did not refer to any of these allegations in his asylum application. *See Alvarez-Santos v. INS,*332 F.3d 1245, 1254 (9th Cir.2003). In addition, contrary to Kirakosyan’s contentions, the IJ’s adverse credibility finding was sufficiently detailed. *See id.*

The IJ adequately analyzed Kirakosyan’s withholding of removal claim. *See id.*at 1255.

Finally, the BIA did not err in not separately addressing Kirakosyan’s Convention Against Torture claim in its streamlined order. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(e)(4).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
MEP Advisory Board Meeting 

Wednesday, March 9, 2022

1 p.m. – 5:00 p.m. EST

Virtual Meeting

Connection Info Sent Under Separate Cover

DRAFT AGENDA

1 p.m.–1:05 p.m.

5 minutes

Meeting Opening/Logistics Cheryl Gendron, NIST MEP

1:05 p.m.–1:30 p.m.

25 minutes

Welcome and Introductions

Opening Remarks and Welcome

Board and Audience Roll Call

Matt Newman, Chair, MEP Advisory 

Board 

Pravina Raghavan, NIST MEP

Jim Olthoff, NIST 

Mojdeh Bahar, NIST

1:30 p.m.–2:30 p.m.

60 minutes

MEP Director’s Update

Board Feedback and Discussion

Pravina Raghavan

2:30 p.m.–2:50 p.m.

20 minutes

Presentation: MEP Program 

Performance Overview

Board Feedback and Discussion

Pravina Raghavan

2:50 p.m.–3:35 p.m.

45 minutes

Presentation: Looking at 

Partnerships Through the Lens of 

Economic Development

Board Feedback and Discussion

Pravina Raghavan

3:35 p.m.–3:55 p.m.

20 minutes

Meeting Break

3:55 p.m.- 4:05 p.m.

10 minutes

Working Group Update:

Supply Chain Development 

Working Group 

Board Feedback and Discussion

Don Bockoven, MEP Advisory Board

Rob Ivester, NIST MEP

Agenda Subject to Change

Times are estimated
4:05 p.m.- 4:15 p.m.

10 minutes

Working Group Update:

MEP National NetworkTM Strategic 

Plan 2023-2028 

Board Feedback and Discussion

Jim Wright, MEP Advisory Board

Mary Ann Pacelli, NIST MEP

4:15 p.m.- 4:35 p.m.

10 minutes

Working Group Update:

Executive Committee Working 

Group

Board Feedback and Discussion

Mary Isbister, MEP Advisory Board

Cheryl Gendron

4:35 p.m.-5:00 p.m.

25 minutes

Public Comments/Wrap Up Matt Newman

Pravina Raghavan

Meeting Open to the Public/Registration Required

All attendees will be participating via webinar; please contact Ms. Cheryl Gendron at 301-975-2785 or 

cheryl.gendron@nist.gov for detailed instructions on how to join the online meeting. All registration requests 

must be received by 5 p.m. EST, Friday, March 4, 2022. 

Rev. 3/9/22
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      53,545,095              53,545,095
<SECURITIES>                                 3,020,865               3,020,865
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,881,091              20,881,091
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (957,409)               (957,409)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            77,205,493              77,205,493
<PP&E>                                       7,331,846               7,331,846
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,247,043)             (1,247,043)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              83,998,945              83,998,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,232,920              20,232,920
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        16,504                  16,504
<OTHER-SE>                                  63,190,627              63,190,627
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                83,998,945              83,998,945
<SALES>                                     17,293,386              30,296,930
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,293,386              30,296,930
<CGS>                                       11,723,984              20,568,567
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,723,984              20,568,567
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,059,837              20,057,977
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,674,184)             (9,101,437)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,674,184)             (9,101,437)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,674,184)             (9,101,437)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.28)                  (0.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)                  (0.59)
        

</TABLE>
H. Res. 286

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 29, 1997.

Resolved, That the House has heard with profound

sorrow of the death of the Honorable Walter H. Capps, a

Representative from the State of California.

Resolved, That a committee of such Members of the

House as the Speaker may designate, together with such

Members of the Senate as may be joined, be appointed to

attend the funeral.

Resolved, That the Sergeant at Arms of the House be

authorized and directed to take such steps as may be necessary for carrying out the provisions of these resolutions and

that the necessary expenses in connection therewith be paid

out of the contingent fund of the House.

Resolved, That the Clerk of the House communicate

these resolutions to the Senate and transmit a copy thereof

to the family of the deceased.
2

•HRES 286 EH

Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it

adjourn as a further mark of respect to the memory of the

deceased.

Attest:

Clerk.