alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Charles E. Ramey, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of US Dataworks, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. Date: August 16, 2004 / s/ Charles E. RameyCharles E. Ramey,Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

STATE/RANDOLPH, LLC, by MIDAMERICA ASSET MANAGEMENT, 

INC., its agent,

Plaintiff,

vs.

OLD NAVY, LLC,

Defendant.

No. ________________________

To: Andrew J. Annes

SATC Law

222 West Adams, Suite 3050

Chicago, IL 60606

NOTICE OF REMOVAL

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1446, Defendant Old 

Navy, LLC, by its undersigned counsel, removed this matter from the Circuit Court 

of Cook County, Illinois to this Court based on diversity of citizenship (28 U.S.C. §

1332). In support of Defendant’s Notice of Removal, Defendant states:

1. On July 21, 2020, Plaintiff State/Randolph, LLC by Mid-America Asset 

Management, Inc., its agent, filed a civil action in the Circuit Court of Cook County, 

Illinois which was styled State/Randolph, LLC v Old Navy, LLC, case no. 2020 M1 

705453 (the “Action”). A copy of the Verified Complaint For Eviction (“Complaint”)

is attached hereto as Exhibit 1.

2. Defendant received the Complaint on July 23, 2020.

Case: 1:20-cv-04382 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:1
2

3. Plaintiff is a limited liability company; the sole member of which is 

Robertson Capital, Ltd. Robertson Capital, Ltd. is an Illinois corporation with its 

principal place of business in Illinois. Mid-America Asset Management, Inc. is an 

Illinois corporation with its principal place of business in Illinois.

4. Defendant Old Navy, LLC is a limited liability company; the sole 

member of which is The Gap, Inc. The Gap, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its 

principal place of business in California.

5. Therefore, Plaintiff and Defendant are citizens of different States. 

6. The Complaint seeks to recover damages in excess of $620,000 and 

evict Defendant from certain retail premises.

7. Because there is a diversity in citizenship and the amount in 

controversy, exclusive of interest and costs, exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, 

this Court has original jurisdiction over this matter. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1).

OLD NAVY, LLC

By: /s/ Charles A. Valente

One of Its Attorneys

Charles A. Valente (ARDC No. 6198718)

cvalente@kaplansaunders.com

Isaiah A. Fishman (ARDC No. 629280)

ifishman@kaplansaunders.com

KAPLAN SAUNDERS VALENTE & BENINATI, LLP

500 N. Dearborn St., Second Floor

Chicago, IL 60654

(312) 755-5700

Case: 1:20-cv-04382 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/27/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:2
Here are some comments.

(1) Perhaps the label should also explain the software's behavior in case it cannot get an update.

Consumers would want to know that if their eLightBulb did not get internet connection (or security

updates) for six months, it bricks. In thinking casually about it, there appear to be two aspects.

First, does the software require some regular update (or at least connection to "home base" to check for

updates)? This could either be *any* connection to the internet or specifically, some confirmation from

"home base". This confirmation could be a simple "the latest software version is nn.nn.nn" or software

updates.

Second, what does the software do if it *doesn't* get connection/confirmation?

A. continue running the software version that it has

B. fall back to some "minimum" or "safe" behavior, e.g., disable "smart functions" but still turn off and

on with a physical switch. This might be reasonable behavior for a smart light bulb.

C. software ceases to function ("bricks")

I didn't see a really good place to put this information. Perhaps under #3 Critical Cybersecurity . . .

or maybe near 2.3.1.5, which deals with end of support.

(2) Related to 2.3.3.4 Hardcoded Secrets, maybe include free from "back doors"? Of course, if

government requires a backdoor in a piece of software, they likely would require the backdoor to be

secret. So maybe this would rarely be useful in practice.

(3) Under 2.3.4.1 PII, Attestation, the bullet list. Perhaps add birthdate (or even age) to the first bullet.

Maybe this is this not usually considered PII.

(4) Availability of labels is mentioned a few times:

"Labels should be available to consumers at the time ... of purchase ..."

As written, it might be interpreted to mean "After you *buy* the software, you can look at the label."

The wording might be clarified to be something like "... available to consumers prior to purchase ..." so

the consumer can use label information in purchase decisions.

(5) In Table 1, some of the bold-type words in descriptions are in italic and some are not. A quick glance

didn't make it clear why the difference. Also, some description have full sentences, some use a hyphen

to separate the "key phrase" from the rest, and some use a colon. These differences may be

unintentional.

-paulPaul E. Black
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Northwestern Mineral Ventures Inc. (the
"Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15 (d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financia1 condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: June 23, 2006
           --

                                                     /s/ Errol Farr
                                                     ------------------------
                                                     Errol Farr
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.

/<DOCUMENT>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

WHAM-O HOLDING, LTD. and 

INTERSPORT CORP. d/b/a WHAM-O,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”,

Defendants.

Civil Action No.: 1:20-cv-03761

Judge Manish S. Shah

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey T. Gilbert

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby files this Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal, without prejudice, as to the following Defendant(s) identified on Schedule A of the 

Complaint:

NO. DEFENDANT

87 jsbay88

108 motorpartsvalue

356 Round2Quit

205 VfjksjlfI23

212 Ygsdtefcdd56

181 Happy handicrafts store

178 Flavor beef jerky Bang bang niu

188 lsanbyre

170 Bingmeiren nv zhuang

203 Tsjhglsyu345

177 feixiangxiaodian

Case: 1:20-cv-03761 Document #: 35 Filed: 08/14/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:7819
DATED: August 14, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt (Bar No. 6207971)

Keith Vogt, Ltd.

111 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1700

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Telephone: 312-675-6079

E-mail: keith@vogtip.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case: 1:20-cv-03761 Document #: 35 Filed: 08/14/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:7820
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document was electronically filed on August 14, 2020 with the Clerk of the Court using the 

CM/ECF system, which will automatically send an email notification of such filing to all registered 

attorneys of record.

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt

Case: 1:20-cv-03761 Document #: 35 Filed: 08/14/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:7821
<Page>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.75

                                   ASSIGNMENT

     This Assignment is made as of the 9th day of January 2004 by INLAND REAL
ESTATE ACQUISITIONS, INC., an Illinois corporation ("Assignor") to and for the
benefit of INLAND WESTERN HICKORY-CATAWBA, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability
company ("Assignee").

     Assignor does hereby sell, assgin, transfer, set over and convey unto
Assignee all of its right, title XXX interest as Buyer under the terms of an
Option to Purchase Partnership Interests in the Winslow Bay CommXXX shopping
center, located in Hickory, North Carolina, dated as of October 16, 2003, as
amended and entered XXX by Hickory Ridge Associates, Limited Partnership, a
Tennessee limited partnership, by Hickory Ridge Development Corporation, a
Tennessee corporation, its General Partner, as Seller, and Assignor as, XXX
collectively, the "Agreement").

     Assignor represents and warrants that it is the Buyer under the
Agreement, and that it has not XXX assigned, transferred, or encumbered such
interest in any way to any other person or entity. By XXX thereof, assignee
accepts the foregoing assignment and agrees, from and after the date hereof,
to (i) perform XXX of the obligations of Buyer under the Agreement, and (ii)
indemnify, defend, protect and hold Assignor XXX from and against all claims
and liabilities arising under the Agreement.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Assignor and Assignee have executed this instrument
as of the date XXX written above.

                              ASSIGNOR:

                              INLAND REAL ESTATE ACQUISITIONS, INC.
                              an Illinois corporation

                              By: /s/ Jason A. Lazarus
                                  -------------------------------
                              Name: Jason A. Lazarus
                                    -----------------------------
                              As Its: Authorized Agent
                                      ---------------------------


                              ASSIGNEE:

                              INLAND WESTERN HICKORY-CATAWBA,
                              L.L.C.,
                              a Delaware limited liability company

                              By: Inland Western Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc.,
                              a Maryland corporation

                              By: /s/ Charles Benevenuto
                                  -------------------------------
                              Name: Charles Benevenuto
                                    -----------------------------
                              As Its: Authorized Agent
                                      ---------------------------
Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation



 Exhibit 4.2 
  

AMENDMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION 
 OF 
 CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION 
  
 TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA: 
  

Chesapeake Energy Corporation (the “Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the Oklahoma General
Corporation Act (the “Act”), for the purpose of amending its certificate of incorporation, does hereby submit the following: 
  

	A.	The name of the Corporation is Chesapeake Energy Corporation. The name under which the Corporation was originally incorporated was Chesapeake Oklahoma Corporation.


  

	B.	The original Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation was filed with the Secretary of State of Oklahoma on November 19, 1996 (as amended from time to time, the
“Certificate of Incorporation”). 

  

	C.	This Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 1077 of the Act at the Corporation’s annual meeting by a majority
of the outstanding capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote thereon. Written notice of the Corporation’s annual meeting was given to the stockholders of the Corporation in accordance with the provisions of Section 1067 of the Act.


  

	D.	The Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended as follows: 

  
 1. Amendment to Article IV. The first sentence of Article IV of the Certificate of Incorporation starting with the words “The total number of shares of capital
stock...” is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following sentence is substituted therefore: 
  
 The total number of shares of capital stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is Five Hundred Twenty Million
(520,000,000) shares, consisting of Twenty Million (20,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, and Five Hundred Million (500,000,000) shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Amendment to Certificate
of Incorporation to be signed by its Chief Executive Officer and attested to by its Secretary this 9th day of June,
2004. 
  

					
	ATTEST:	  	 	  	 CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION,
 an Oklahoma
corporation

			
	/s/ JENNIFER M. GRIGSBY	  	By:	  	/s/ AUBREY K. MCCLENDON
	Jennifer M. Grigsby, Secretary	  	 	  	 Aubrey K. McClendon,
 Chief Executive
Officer
H. Res. 244

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 1 (legislative day, September 30), 1997.

Whereas the contested election case of Dornan v. Sanchez is

pending before the Committee;

Whereas the Federal Contested Elections Act (2 U.S.C. 381

et seq.) (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the

‘‘Act’’) provides for the issuance of subpoenas, and on

March 17, 1997, United States District Court Judge

Gary L. Taylor issued such a subpoena at the request of

the Contestant for the deposition and records of

Hermandad Mexicana Nacional;

Whereas on April 16, 1997, the Committee voted to modify

the subpoena by limiting production of documents to the

46th Congressional District (among other modifications),

and as perfected by the Committee, the subpoena required Hermandad Mexicana Nacional to produce documents and appear for a deposition no later than May 1,

1997;

Whereas Hermandad Mexicana Nacional failed to produce

documents or appear for the deposition by May 1, 1997,

and still has not complied with the subpoena;

Whereas Hermandad Mexicana Nacional, by willfully failing

to comply with the lawfully issued subpoena, is in viola-
2

•HRES 244 EH

tion of section 11 of the Act (2 U.S.C. 390), which provides for criminal penalties;

Whereas on May 13, 1997, the Contestant wrote to the United States Attorney for the Central District of California,

Nora M. Manella, requesting that action be taken to enforce the law with respect to Hermandad Mexicana

Nacional, and on June 23, 1997, the Committee wrote to

the Department of Justice inquiring as to the status of

this request for criminal prosecution, and the Department responded on July 25, 1997, that the criminal referral remained ‘‘under review’’;

Whereas the United States Attorney’s failure to enforce

criminal penalties for the violation of the Act encourages

disrespect for the law and hinders the constitutionally

mandated process of determining the facts in the contested election case, including the discovery of any election fraud that may have influenced the outcome of the

election; and

Whereas on September 23, 1997, the United States District

Court for the Central District of California ruled that the

deposition subpoena provisions of the Act are constitutional: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives demands

that the Office of the United States Attorney for the Central

District of California carry out its responsibility by filing,

pursuant to its determination that it is appropriate according

to the law and the facts, criminal charges against
3

•HRES 244 EH

Hermandad Mexicana Nacional for failure to comply with a

valid subpoena issued under the Act.

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                         5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-28-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-28-2000
<CASH>                                           83700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,315,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                   401,641
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,287,325
<PP&E>                                       5,206,549
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,754,496
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,905,940
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,487,428
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,355
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,692,148
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,905,940
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            38,095,920
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,338,834
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,701,374
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             757,893
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,297,819
<INCOME-TAX>                                   608,858
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            688,961
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   688,961
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of American Power Conversion Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10Q for the period ending September 25, 2005 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rodger B. Dowdell, Jr.,Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Rodger B.  Dowdell, Jr.                 |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                             |
| Rodger B.  Dowdell, Jr.                     |
| Chairman,  President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

November 4, 2005

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of aseparate disclosure document.

 

1

----