alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.6

Report of Independent Accountants

To the Board of Directors of Chase Bank USA, N.A.,
Administrator of the Chase Credit Card Owner Trust Series 2004-2

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management
Report on Internal Control over Administration of the Chase Credit Card Owner
Trust Series 2004-2 (the "Owner Trust"), that Chase Bank USA, N.A. (the "Bank",
formerly known as "Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A."), as Administrator of the
Owner Trust, maintained effective internal control over its Administration of
the Certificates held by the Owner Trust and the Notes issued by the Owner Trust
as of December 31, 2004, in compliance with the Chase Credit Card Owner Trust
Series 2004-2 Indenture, dated June 1, 2004 (the "Administration" of the Owner
Trust), based upon the criteria for effective internal control established in
"Internal Control - Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Bank's management is responsible
for maintaining effective internal control over Administration of the Owner
Trust. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
Administration of the Owner Trust, testing and evaluating the design and
operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, misstatement due to
error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any
evaluation of internal control over the Administration of the Owner Trust to
future periods are subject to the risk that the internal control may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Chase Bank USA, N.A., as
Administrator of the Chase Credit Card Owner Trust Series 2004-2, maintained
effective internal control over the Administration of the Certificates held by
the Owner Trust and the Notes issued by the Owner Trust as of December 31, 2004,
in compliance with the Chase Credit Card Owner Trust Series 2004-2 Indenture,
dated June 1, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based upon the
criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal Control -
Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

March 29, 2005
Exhibit 23.1








Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Cord Blood America, Inc.








We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 Nos. 333-164067, 333-158765, 333-155363, and 333-152226 of our report dated March 30, 2010, with respect to the financial statements of Cord Blood America, Inc. in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Our report relating to the consolidated financial statements contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.







Rose, Snyder & Jacobs


A Corporation of Certified Public Accountants





Encino, California





March 30, 2010
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 352 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                 House Calendar No. 144
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 352

                          [Report No. 105-415]

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 1998

    Mr. Dreier, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

    Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on Wednesday, 
February 11, 1998, or on Thursday, February 12, 1998, for the Speaker 
to entertain motions that the House suspend the rules. The Speaker or 
his designee shall consult with the minority leader or his designee on 
the designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to this 
resolution.




                                                 House Calendar No. 144

105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 352

                          [Report No. 105-415]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            February 5, 1998

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Keefe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 29, 2011

/s/ David J. KeefeDavid J. KeefeChief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this Report.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3851 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3851

  To authorize an additional permanent judgeship for the district of 
                                Hawaii.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2004

  Mr. Abercrombie (for himself and Mr. Case) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize an additional permanent judgeship for the district of 
                                Hawaii.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRICT JUDGESHIP FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII.

    (a) Additional Permanent District Judgeship.--The President shall 
appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, 1 additional 
district judge for the district of Hawaii.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--In order that the table 
under section 133(a) of title 28, United States Code, will reflect the 
change in the number of permanent judgeships authorized for the 
district of Hawaii by subsection (a), such table is amended by striking 
the item relating to Hawaii and inserting the following:

 ``Hawaii...................................................      4.''.
                                 <all>
```
Rev. 01272016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

219 SOUTH DEARBORN STREET

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604

NOTIFICATION OF CHANGE OF ATTORNEY ADDRESS OR NAME

1. Complete this form and e-file it, using the Notice of Change of Address event, in each

case that you list below.

2. Update your contact information in CM/ECF. Click HERE for update instructions.

Name

Firm

Street Address

City/State/Zip Code

Phone Number 

Email address

ARDC (Illinois State Bar members, only)

If you have previously filed an appearance with this court using a different name, enter that name. 

List all active cases in which you currently have an appearance on file.

Case Number Case Title Assigned Judge

_______________________________ 

Signature of Attorney 

_______________________

Date 

In Re: TikTok, Inc., Consumer

Privacy Litigation 

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 111 Filed: 12/01/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1868
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Mark J. Morabito, Chief Executive Officer of Crosshair Exploration & Mining Corp. (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(4)

the annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended April 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(5)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                       |                        
|---------------------- | -----------------------
|                       | /s/ Mark J. Morabito   
|Date: October 22, 2007 | By:
Mark J. Morabito,  
|                       | Chief Executive Officer





Doc. 4838696
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6625

DANIEL LEE DAVIS, Petitioner - Appellant,

versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-00371-CMH) Submitted: August 30, 2007 De cided: September 7, 2007 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel Lee Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Josephine Frances Whalen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Daniel Lee Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Davis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-31134

Summary Calendar

 

ERNEST J. COLONNA, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LARRY G. MASSANARI,

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 98-CV-771

 

April 18, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ernest J. Colonna appeals the denial of his claim for

Supplemental Security Income benefits. He asserts that the district

court erred in affirming the Commissioner's denial of his claim.

Colonna contends that (1) the Appeals Council erred by not

remanding the cause to the Administrative Law Judge for

consideration of new and material evidence; (2) Colonna is entitled

to reversal because the ALJ did not require the examining
1 Colonna v. Apfel, No. 2:98-CV-771 (W.D. La. July 18, 2000)

(unpublished).

2

psychiatrist to submit a mental assessment form; and (3) the

Appeals Council improperly relied on the Medical-Vocational

Guidelines to justify the denial of benefits. 

After careful review of the record, we AFFIRM based

substantially on the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's

report, which the district court accepted.1

AFFIRMED.
20CR 475 ry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DURKIN

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
1 ; —
DESIGNATION SHEET FOR CRIMINAL procenprtAgiSTRATE JUDGE VALDE?

1. Is this an indictment or information arising out of offenses charged in one or more
previously-filed complaints signed by a magistrate judge? No (You must answer 1b even if
the answer is No)

la. If the answer is “Yes,” list the case number and title of the earliest filed
complaint: n/a

1b. Should this indictment or information receive a new case number from the
court? Yes

2. Is this an indictment or information that supersedes one or more previously-filed
indictments or informations? No

2a. If the answer is “Yes,” list the case number and title of the earliest filed
superseded indictment or information and the name of the assigned judge (Local Rule
40.3(b)(2)): n/a

3. Is this a re-filing of a previously dismissed indictment or information? No

4. Is this a case arising out of the failure of the defendant to appear in a criminal
proceeding in this Court? No

5. Is this a transfer of probation supervision from another district to this District? No
6. What level of offense is this indictment or information? Felony

ie Does this indictment or information involve eight or more defendants? No

8. Does this indictment or information include a conspiracy count? No

9. Identify the type of offense that describes the count, other than any conspiracy count,
with the most severe penalty: Use of an interstate facility to promote unlawful activity

haya
10. List the statute o! th of the offenses charged in the indictment or information. 18

U.S.C. §§ 1001 and 1952; and 26 U.S.C. §§ 7206(1) and 7203

FILED Qimes. drbn
foates Durkin wes tomey (27)

AUG 06 2029 ~~

THOMAS G BRUTO
. N
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
10431.

#### Hobgood *v.*The State.

Decided June 9, 1919.

Accusation of receiving stolen goods; from city court of Tifton— Judge Price. February 18, 1919.

*B. C. Williford,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. S. Bidgdill, solicitor, R. D. Smith,*contra.

Broyi.es, P. J.

The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and, as the motion for a new trial contains only the usual general grounds, the judgment below is *Affirmed.*

*Bloodworih and Stephens, JJ., concur.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

LAWRENCE H. GRESS, on behalf of himself 

and others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY, 

an Illinois corporation; JOHN DOES 1-100, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 1:20-cv-04405 

Hon. Jorge L. Alonso

MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE OF GAYLE E. LITTLETON 

Pursuant to Local Rule 83.17, Defendant Commonwealth Edison Company (“ComEd”) 

requests leave to withdraw the appearance of Gayle E. Littleton as counsel for ComEd. In support 

thereof, ComEd states as follows: 

1. On August 24, 2020, Ms. Littleton entered an appearance on behalf of ComEd as a 

Partner of Jenner & Block LLP. 

2. Ms. Littleton is no longer a Partner at Jenner & Block LLP. 

3. ComEd will continue to be represented by the undersigned counsel of record from 

Jenner & Block LLP. 

4. Neither party will be prejudiced by the withdrawal of the appearance of Ms. 

Littleton. 

WHEREFORE, ComEd respectfully requests that the Court enter an order granting leave 

to withdraw the appearance of Gayle E. Littleton as counsel for ComEd. 

Case: 1:20-cv-04405 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/18/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1318
2 

Dated: November 18, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Terrence J. Truax

Terrence J. Truax 

Matthew E. Price E. Glenn Rippie 

JENNER & BLOCK JENNER & BLOCK LLP 

1099 New York Avenue, NW Suite 900 353 N. Clark Street 

Washington, DC 20001-4412 Chicago, IL 60654-3456 

Telephone: (202) 639-6000 Telephone: (312) 222-9350 

Facsimile: (202) 639-6066 Facsimile: (312) 527-0484 

Counsel for Defendant 

Commonwealth Edison Company 

Case: 1:20-cv-04405 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/18/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:1319
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, Terrence J. Truax, an attorney, certify that I caused copies of the foregoing MOTION 

TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE OF GAYLE E. LITTLETON to be served on all counsel 

of record via the Court’s electronic filing system. 

/s/ Terrence J. Truax

Counsel for Defendant Commonwealth Edison 

Company 

Case: 1:20-cv-04405 Document #: 62 Filed: 11/18/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:1320
Priority Action Report

Crime Scene Investigation

Crime Scene Death Investigation SAC

Dr. Marilyn Miller

February 13, 2017
Subcommittee Leadership

Position Name Organization Term Email

Chair Marilyn Miller VCU Dept ForSci 3 mtmiller@vcu.edu

Vice Chair Charles Becnel LA State Police Crime 

Lab

4 adam.becnel@la.gov

Executive 

Secretary

Daphne Anderson RSI 3 daffyanderson@gmail.com

2
Subcommittee Members

# Name Organization Term Email

1 Alana Beaven DC Department of Forensic Science 2 alana.beaven@gmail.com

2 Jeffrey Cover Independent Consultant 4 jcover@hotsheet.com

3 Teresa Devitt-Lynch US Navy 3 tdevittlynch@gmail.com

4 Karen Green Green Forensics Inc. 3 karen@green-forensics.com

5 Michael Haag Albuquerque PD Crime Lab 4 mhaag@cabq.gov

6 Michael P. Kessler NetBio, Inc. 3 michaelpaulkessler@gmail.com

7 Kimberlee Sue Moran Rutgers University 4 k.moran@camden.rutgers.edu

8 Guy Nutter MI State Police Laboratory Div. 3 nutterg@Michigan.gov

9 Christine Pinto Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Dept 2 cmpinto@lasd.org

10 Ryan Rezzelle Leica Geosystems, Inc. 2 Ryan.Rezzelle@gmail.com

11 John J. Schultz UCF, Dept of Anthropology 2 john.schultz@ucf.edu

12 Troy Wilson Texas Dept of Public Safety 3 troy.Wilson@dps.texas.gov

13 Neil Zielinski Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office 4 zielinskin@pbso.org

14

15

16

17 3
(Optional) Affiliates

# Name Organization Term Email

1 Peter Massey CSDISAC 3 yrs pmassey@newhaven.edu

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17 4
Discipline Description

The Crime Scene Investigation 

Subcommittee will focus on the standards 

and guidelines related to the investigation 

of crime scenes including the search for, 

the documentation of and the presentation 

of evidence associated the crime scene.

5
Research Needs Identified

• Crime Scene Research Database and Information 

Clearinghouse

• Crime Scene Investigation Documentation Technology

• Human Factors in Crime Scene Investigation

• Use of Laboratory Based Techniques and Technology at the 

Crime Scene

• Crime Scene Contamination

• Evaluation of Personal Protective Equipment at the Crime 

Scene

6
Glossary

• Crime Scene Investigation specific terms submitted.

• Included crime scene reconstruction and shooting scene 

reconstructions.

7
Summary of Priority Projects

Priority OSAC 

Process Working Title of Document

8

Selection of SDO

Standards and Guidelines
9
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                      Citizens Effingham Bancshares, Inc.
                                 and Subsidiary

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Citizens Effingham
Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harry H. Shearouse, President and Chief
Executive Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      To the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with
                  the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the
                  Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
                  financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

May 7, 2003

/s/ Harry H. Shearouse
-------------------------------------

Harry H. Shearouse
President and Chief Executive Officer
. . . . 

._ -. 

. . . . . ...* 

OFFICE OF THE ATI-ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

ate4 ??y paas\ ;yught itiavbg Uu. - - 
T&e opllw&u @f the Cowtl of thlr Mate hue a& 

beea unlfora upan the qwrtloa but the lateat expreul~ ti 

vithal the roundeat aenelushn, ve thhk, rerpeet 

matter la rouad la Werleao v. Uhltnej, 234 8. If. ? W) 1047, 

oplnloa by Ju&e Sudley, adopted bj the ihproaa Cmn’$ J&wiry 

3, 1940. Intha oowae ofhla OpinionJudgo Wedby r&L& 

* 

. . l sta a dwa tlme, h Qlmvw, umvk Ilo va 

aad .wed, la that vhlch uaa srkblhhed u the 

mnuaad4ItUdwdtlufweaohmnevuflxed 

bamed o n the maa ueo nwlea l t& se o f I iip eo lflui 

d0g r ~ or 2u4&t*.. ma 4 1 h a a .bpext4sa wd in th0 

l o o a d r du, the rtm tme o f ~vhlalih o nl@r í 

de8lg 4 abty ed the ut u united ~sta iteu a ndwd 

o e4 tr at!l a c r í 
,:j.; :. 

Ranarablc Bert Fwdr SW* 3 

2oAurlunJurir adrrrar 

The ao*t Judia &y 4 !ztk% 
8whU opo~aaIl62~0$te~ ef ocJun,aotlc%$vh%nr%- 

q&red by lav, fi2lng of appeal baado, rpPlfmtion8 fw writ8 

,~f error, a&w under n pier, and the like.