alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Scott J. Miller, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annualreport on Form 10-K of U.S. Premium Beef, LLC; 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisannual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 

4. The registrant's othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

c) disclosedin this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant's othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): 

a) allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

b) any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|     |  |                                                          |
|-----|--|----------------------------------------------------------|
| By: |  | /s/ Scott J. Miller                                      |
|     |  | Scott J. Miller*Chief Reporting and  Compliance Officer* |

Date: November 23, 2005
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). JT / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T MOHA N S I NG H, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 06- 74546 A ge nc yN o. A 097- 604- 924 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r15, 2009 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M oh an S i ng h, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f I nd i a, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of the B oard o f I m m ig ra ti o n A p p ea ls’ o rd erd ism issin g h is ap p ea l fro m an im m ig ra ti o n ju d g e’s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , a nd 

# FI LED DE C 23 2009 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSJ T / Res ea r ch 06- 74546 2 re l i ef un der the C on vent i on A gai nstT orture ( “ C A T ”) . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e rev i ew fo r su b st an t i al ev i d en ce th e ag en cy’ s ad v erse c r e di bi l i tyde t e rm i na t i on, T ekle v . Mukasey , 53 3 F . 3d 10 44 , 10 51 (9th C i r. 20 08 ), a n dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. S ub st ant i al evi dence s up po rt s the IJ ’ s f i nd i ng thati tw as i m pl ausi bl e that S i ngh w oul d vi s i tthe U ni t e d S t a t e s on s e ve r a l oc c a s i ons f ol l ow i ng hi s a rr e s ta nd brut al beat i ng i n 1 99 8 and no tse ek as yl um , despi t e kno w i ng thatsuch re l i ef w as a v a ilab le to h im . See L oh o v. Mukasey , 531 F . 3d 1016, 1017- 19 ( 9th C i r . 2008) (pet i t i on er ’ s vol un t ary r eturn t o h erho m e c ou ntryi nh er ent l y und erm i ned h er t est i m o n y th atsh e ex p eri en cedp astsu fferi n g , an dth erefo re su p p o rt edan ad v erse c r e d ib ilityf

in d in g ) . I n th e ab s e n c e o f c r e d ib le te s tim o n y , S in g h h a s f a ile dto e s tab lis h h e is e lig ib le f o ra s y lu m o rw ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l. See Farah v. A s h c r o ft , 34 8 F . 3d 11 53 , 11 56 (9th C i r. 20 03 ). B e c aus e S i ngh’ s C A T c l a i m i s ba s e d on the s a m e e vi de nc e the a ge nc yf ound notc r e di bl e , a nd he poi nt s t o no othe re vi de nc e t o s how i ti s m or e l i ke l ytha n not h e w o u ldb e to rtu r e dif

r e tu rn e dto I n d ia , h is C A T c la im f a ils . Se e id . a t1156- 57. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CURAY J. DAVIS, )

a/k/a CURAY JEROME DAVIS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-892

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed April 3, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; William D. Sites, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Tosha Cohen, Assistant Public Defender, 

Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

VILLANTI, Judge.

Curay Jerome Davis challenges the trial court's imposition of a $500 fine 

and 5% surcharge. Davis properly preserved this issue by filing a motion to correct 

sentencing error under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). The State 

responded by arguing that the fine was a mandatory fine, relying on section 
- 2 -

893.13(1)(d)(3), Florida Statutes (2017). But the statute did not factually apply to 

Davis's case because he was not charged with the sale of a controlled substance within 

1000 feet of a proscribed location. Rather, the fine was discretionary and the trial court 

was thus required to pronounce the statutory authority for the fine, section 775.083, 

Florida Statutes (2017). See Perdue v. State, 17 So. 3d 1283 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) 

(holding that the trial court erred in failing to orally pronounce the statutory authority for 

the discretionary $525 fines and surcharges). 

Because the trial court erred by failing to orally pronounce the statutory 

authority, we remand for entry of a corrected judgment striking the $500 fine and 5% 

surcharge. In all other respects, we affirm.

LUCAS and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 54

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Small Business

in the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 12, 1997

Mr. TALENT submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Oversight

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on

Small Business in the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Small Business

4 (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Commit5 tee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses,

8 not more than $4,099,817 for the One Hundred Fifth

9 Congress.
2

•HRES 54 IH

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

2 Of the amount specified in section 1—

3 (1) not more than $2,014,818 shall be available

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

5 noon on January 3, 1997, and ending immediately

6 before noon on January 3, 1998; and

7 (2) not more than $2,084,999 shall be available

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

9 noon on January 3, 1998, and ending immediately

10 before noon on January 3, 1999.

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner

15 directed by the Committee on House Oversight.

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by

19 the Committee on House Oversight.

Æ
9988.

#### Huff *v.*The State.

Decided November 1, 1918.

Indictment for burglary; from Bleckley superior court—Judge Graham. July 17, 1918.

Broyles, P. J.

1. It does not appear that the trial judge abused his discretion in overruling the motion for a continuance based upon the absence of certain witnesses who did 'not reside in the county where the case was pending.

*2.'*The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed..*

*Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concu/r.*

*789
      *W. A. Dampier,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. A. Wooten, solicitor-general,*contra.
8398.

#### Southern Railway Co. *v.*Hodgson Brothers Co.

Decided April 12, 1919.

Garnishment; from city court of Athens—Judge West. December 18, 1916.

*Blanton Fortson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Wolver M. Smith, Erwin, Rucher & Erwin,*contra.

Bloodworth, J.

The case having been carried by writ of certiorari from this court to the Supreme Court of Georgia, and that court having reversed the decision originally rendered by this court (148 *Ga.*851, 98 S. E. 541); and the rulings of the Supreme Court being controlling on all the issues involved, it is ordered that the original judgment rendered by this court (21 *Ga. App.*753, 95 S. E. 263) be vacated, and the judgment of the trial court be

*Reversed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

JOSEPH TULL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) )

v. ) Civil Case No. 10-629 (RJL) ) OFFICE OF THE ARCHITECT OF ) THE CAPITOL, ) ) STEPHEN AYERS, the Architect ofthe ) Capitol, in his personal capacity, ) ) REBECCA TISCIONE, a retired ) employee ofthe Architect ofthe ) Capitol, in her personal capacity, ) ) EVELYN GOODWIN, an employee of ) the Architect ofthe Capitol, in her ) personal capacity, ) ) TONDA CAVE, an employee ofthe ) Architect ofthe Capitol, in her personal ) capacity, ) ) EDGARD MARTINEZ, an employee of ) the Architect ofthe Capitol, in his ) personal capacity, ) ) and ) ) WILLIAM MILLER, an employee of ) the Architect ofthe Capitol, in his ) personal capacity, ) ) Dekndanh. )

ORDERFor the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this 

# A

# ~1ayofAugust, 2011, hereby

ORDERED that the defendants' Motion to Dismiss [#8] is GRANTED; it is

further

ORDERED that the above-captioned case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

United States District Judge
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Francis M. Colalucci, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthe Annual Report of Tower Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”);

2.                 Based on myknowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by the Report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin the Report, fairly present in all respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periodspresented in the Report;

4.                 The Company’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

(a)          designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which theReport is being prepared;

(b)         evaluated theeffectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin the Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by the Reportbased on such evaluation; and

(c)          disclosed in the Reportthat there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Company’s fourth quarter of 2005 that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The Company’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’sauditors and to the audit committee of the Board of Directors:

a.                  all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b.                 anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting.
| /s/ FRANCIS M. COLALUCCI |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Francis M.  Colalucci    |   |
| Chief Financial  Officer |   |
| March 15,  2006     |   |

 

----
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 476 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                 House Calendar No. 210
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 476

                          [Report No. 105-583]

    Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 463) to 
 establish the Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/
        Commercial Concerns With the People's Republic of China.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 1998

   Mr. Solomon, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
    Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 463) to 
 establish the Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/
        Commercial Concerns With the People's Republic of China.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the resolution (H. Res. 463) to establish the Select Committee on 
U.S. National Security and Military/Commercial Concerns With the 
People's Republic of China. The resolution shall be considered as read 
for amendment. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended 
by the Committee on Rules now printed in the resolution shall be 
considered as adopted. The resolution, as amended, shall be debatable 
for one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Rules. The previous question shall 
be considered as ordered on the resolution, as amended, to final 
adoption without intervening motion.
                                     





                                                 House Calendar No. 210

105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 476

                          [Report No. 105-583]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

    Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 463) to 
 establish the Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/
        Commercial Concerns With the People's Republic of China.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 17, 1998

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
EXHIBIT 23
___________



Independent Auditors' Consent



The Board of Directors
MedPlus, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration 
statements of MedPlus, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 (No. 33-
94426) and Form S-3 (No. 333-20547) of our report dated April 9, 
1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of MedPlus, Inc. 
and subsidiaries as of January 31, 1998 and 1997 and December 31, 
1996, and the related consolidated statements of operations, 
shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the year ended January 
31, 1998, the one month period ended January 31, 1997 and for the 
years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, which report appears in 
the January 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-KSB of MedPlus, Inc. 
and subsidiaries.


KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Cincinnati, Ohio
April 30, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0001049530
<NAME> ACME INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, LLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             938
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,607
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (598)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,210
<PP&E>                                          21,261
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,841)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 287,262
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,231
<BONDS>                                        192,734
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   287,262
<SALES>                                         11,123
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,123
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,417
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,822
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    43
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,830
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,116)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,255)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,371)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,371)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 4.1

(STOCK CERTIFICATE)



---



##### 



[REVERSE OF
CERTIFICATE OF TRUST STOCK] MACQUARIE INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANY TRUST The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be
construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:  TEN COM
    
    
    
    as tenants in commonTEN ENT
    
    
    
    as tenants by the entiretiesJT TEN
    
    
    
    as joint tenants with right
of survivorship and not as
tenants in common
 UNIF
GIFT MIN ACT 
    
    
    
    Custodian(Cust)
    
    (Minor)under Uniform Gifts to MinorsAct(State)UNIF
TRF MIN ACT -
    
    
    
    Custodian (until age )(Cust)under Uniform Transfers(Minor)to Minors Act(State)
   Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For Value received, _____________________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto  PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL
SECURITY OR OTHER
IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
 
          Shares
  Attorney
  Date
    
    
    
    XX
  
 NOTICE:
    THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE
NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLAREMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
   SIGNATURES GUARANTEED: By