T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GU O L I N WAN G, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 70822 A ge nc yN o. A 099- 538- 364 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ar c h 8, 2011 ** B efo re: F A R R IS , O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. G uo L i n W ang, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of C hi na , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oa r d of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ or de rdi s m i s s i ng hi s appe a l f r om the i m m i gr a t i on j ud ge’ s dec i si on denyi ng hi s app l i cat i on for a sy l um . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew de no vo qu es t i on s of l aw and revi ew for s ub st ant i al 

# FI LED MA R 21 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 70822 2 e v id e n c e f

a c tu a l f in d in g s . Fakhry v . Mukasey , 5 2 4 F .3 d1 0 5 7 , 1 0 6 2 ( 9 th C i r . 2008) . W e gr antthe pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w , a nd w e r e m and. W a n g c o n te n d s th a t b e c au s e o f h is p artic ip a tio n in a n u n d e r g r o u n dc h u r c h in C hi na , he w a s arr e s t e d bygove rnm e ntof f i c i a l s , de t a i ne d f

ors e ve n day s , s l appe d, a nd s uf f e r e d f r om a n i l l ne s s a s ar e s ul tof hi s i nc ar c e r a t i on. T he r e c or d doe s not co m p el th e co n cl u si o n th atW an g su fferedp astp ersecu t i o n b asedo n th ese e x p e r ie n c e s . See G u v. G on zales , 45 4 F . 3d 10 14 , 10 20 -21 (9th C i r. 20 06 ); Na g o u lko v . I

NS , 33 3 F . 3d 10 12 , 10 18 (9th C i r. 20 03 ). H ow ever , subst ant i al evi dence does notsupp ortthe agency’ s r el ocat i on fi nd i ng base d o n evi dence sugg es t i ng thati n som e pl ac es i ti s e as i ert o att end u nregi st er ed churches and that th e r e ar e a r e a s w h e r e p e rh ap s au th o r itie s a r e m o r e le n ie n t. See 8 C. F. R. § 1 2 0 8 .1 3 ( b ) ( 3 ) ( ii) ; Fa kh ry , 524 F . 3d a t1065 ( be c aus e pe t i t i one rt e s t i f i e d he f e a r e d pe r s e c ut i on a tthe hands of the gove rnm e nt , he “ ga i ns the be ne f i tof the p r e s u m p tio n th a t th e th r e a t o f p e r s e c u tio n e x is ts n a tio n w id e a n dth at r e lo c a tio n is th e r e f o r e u n r e a s o n ab le ” ) ; A

f ri yi e v . H older , 613 F . 3d 924, 935- 36 ( 9th C i r . 2010) ( d is c u s s in g f

a c to r s to c o n s id e rin d e te rm in in g w h e th e rr e lo c a tio n is r e a s o n ab le ) . W e there fore grantthe pet i t i on for r evi ew as t o the agency’ s w el l -f ou nd ed fe ar08- 70822 3 f in d in g an dr e m an df

o rf u rth e rp r o c e e d in g s . See IN S v. V en tu ra , 537 U . S . 12, 16 -18 (20 02 ) ( per c uri am ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W GR AN T E D; RE MAND E D.