alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 19

- 00026

- CR

JASON LAMON MAYES, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 6th District Court Lamar County, Texas Trial Court No. 27450

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.2 

### O RDER
Our review of the reporter’s record in this case indicates that it contains “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a driver’s license number, pa ssport number, social security number, tax identification number or similar government

- issued personal identification number.”
T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 9.10(a)(1). Volume eight of the reporter’s record , together with Exhibit 27 Case Report and Exhibit 27 , include social security numbers. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices,
must not contain sensitive data.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 9.10(b). Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper form or electronic form, without redaction.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because volume eight of the reporter’s record , together with Exhibit 27 Case Report and Exhibit 27 , contain sensitive data, we order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed volume eight of the reporter’s record , together with Exhibit 27 Case Report and Exhibit 27 , in this case.
IT IS SO ORDERE D.

BY THE COURT
Date: October 22, 2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>         0001049588
<NAME>        BOLLE INC
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
<CURRENCY>    USD

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,879
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,552
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,022
<INVENTORY>                                     11,810
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,958
<PP&E>                                           7,231
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,225
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,102
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,365
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           20,914
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            69
<OTHER-SE>                                         909
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,102
<SALES>                                         14,664
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                            6,778
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,791
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 451
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    422
<INCOME-TAX>                                       164
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                261
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       261
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
NVLAP LAB CODE:

VOTING SYSTEM TESTING: PAGE 1 OF 1 

AMENDMENT TO NVLAP GENERAL APPLICATION (VERSION 1, ISSUED 2007-01) 

AMENDMENT TO NVLAP GENERAL APPLICATION AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR 

VOTING SYSTEM TESTING LABORATORIES 

The National Voluntary Accreditation Program (NVLAP) established and is conducting its laboratory 

accreditation program for voting system testing laboratories in support of the responsibilities 

delegated to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) under Section 231 of the 

Help America Vote Act (HAVA). 

Specifically, the Act directs NIST to evaluate the competence of independent, non-Federal 

laboratories to test voting systems to Federal standards and to make recommendations to the EAC 

for its accreditation of laboratories qualified to conduct the testing, certification, decertification, and 

recertification of voting systems as provided under the act. The EAC makes the final decision to 

accredit laboratories based upon the information provided by NIST and the Commission’s review of 

non-technical issues such as conflict-of-interest policies, organizational structure and recordkeeping protocols. 

Both NIST and the EAC have determined that assessment processes relating to voting system 

testing laboratories will be as open and transparent as possible to facilitate the public’s 

understanding of how laboratories that test voting systems are evaluated. 

To effect this transparency, NVLAP and _________________________________________, 

NVLAP Lab Code___________________ hereby agree to the following amendments to the 

Application agreement (Conditions for Accreditation) signed on ________________________: 

1) Accreditation assessments and proficiency testing work done by NIST/NVLAP will not be 

conducted under authority granted to NIST by Title 15 United States Code Section 3710a. 

2) Information obtained during application, on-site assessment, proficiency testing, evaluation 

and accreditation will be protected from disclosure to the extent permitted by applicable 

laws. NIST/NVLAP and the Laboratory agree that this information will not be afforded the 

additional protections accorded pursuant to Title 15 USC 3710a(c)(7)(A) and (7)(B). 

3) The Laboratory hereby agrees that during the granting of accreditation and notification to 

EAC, NVLAP may release on-site assessment reports, nonconformity responses, and other 

laboratory generated information to NIST to be posted publicly in support of NIST 

recommendations to the Election Assistance Commission. 

4) The Laboratory agrees to prominently mark information submitted to NVLAP that it deems to 

be proprietary. 

As the laboratory’s Authorized Representative, I agree to the above amendments to my application 

for accreditation. 

Signature _____________________________________ Date ________________________ 

Printed Name
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Dominic Antonio MARSHALL, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-4360.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 8, 2004.

Decided Dec. 29, 2004.

Robert L. Jenkins, Jr., Bynum & Jenkins, P.L.L.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Michael J. Elston, Assistant United States Attorney, Natalie A. Voris, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Dominic Antonio Marshall appeals the district court’s judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict finding him guilty of conspiring to distribute 50 grams or more of crack cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2000), and distributing 50 grams or more of crack cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2000). On appeal, Marshall challenges the district court’s denial of his oral motion for acquittal made pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 29(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Exhibit 99.4





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of DDi Capital Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Joseph P. Gisch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Date: August 14, 2002

By:

/s/    JOSEPH P. GISCHJoseph P. Gisch Chief
Financial Officer
][

][

][

][

()

()

()

()

()

)(

Úð

DIV N

DIV K

DIV Y

DIV A

DIV B

DIV D

DIV E

DIV F

DIV G

DIV H

BRANCH III

BRANCH II

BRANCH I

BRANCH VI

ST191

ST70

ST162

ST32

ST99

ST32

ST70

ST149

ST99

C

o

n

c

ow

C

o

n

c

ow

DDuurrhhaamm

OOrroovviillllee

OOrroovviillllee EEaasstt

PPaalleerrmmoo

SSoouutthh

OOrroovviillllee

TThheerrmmaalliittoo

PPaarraaddiissee

CChhiiccoo

SSttoorrrriiee

TToobbiinn

MMaaggaalliiaa

Camp Incident

CA-BTU-016737

November 9, 2018

0 1.25 2.5 5

Miles

Briefing Area Map

Exported By IMT4 GIS at:

11/9/2018 02:02
**Exhibit10.1(b)**

Schedule of Purchasers
| ** **       | **Name of Purchaser** | ** ** | ** ** | **Number of Series M Preferred  Shares Purchased** | ** **  | **Purchase Price** | ** ** |
|------------------|---------------------------------|------------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|-------------------------|------------|
| Greg Gard        |                            | 55         |       | $                                                                           | 20.00/share |                    |
| Robert Maltarich |                            | 110        |       | $                                                                           | 20.00/share |                    |
| James Kaboski    |                            | 220        |       | $                                                                           | 20.00/share |                    |
| Stephen Auburn   |                            | 220        |       | $                                                                           | 20.00/share |                    |
| Andrew McLean    |                            | 220        |       | $                                                                           | 20.00/share |                    |
| Fred Wampnar     |                            | 220        |       | $                                                                           | 20.00/share |                    |
| Joseph Kwederis  |                            | 310        |       | $                                                                           | 20.00/share |                    |
| James Kingsley   |                            | 440        |       | $                                                                           | 20.00/share |                    |
| Kenneth Swanson  |                            | 440        |       | $                                                                           | 20.00/share |                    |
| Robert Corey     |                            | 765        |       | $                                                                           | 20.00/share |                    |
| Harold Bevis     |                            | 5,000      |       | $                                                                           | 20.00/share |                    |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosures controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Eric W. FinlaysonEric W. Finlayson
          Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 555

Recognizing the suffering and hardship endured by American civilian prisoners

of war during World War II.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 25, 1998

Mrs. LOWEY (for herself and Mr. ENGEL) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the suffering and hardship endured by American

civilian prisoners of war during World War II.

Whereas 18,745 American civilians were incarcerated by the

Axis powers during World War II;

Whereas the incarceration of these American civilians violated

international human rights principles;

Whereas these American civilian prisoners of war were subjected to barbaric prison conditions and endured torture,

starvation, and disease; and

Whereas the vast majority of these civilian prisoners of war

have never received any formal recognition or compensation for their suffering, despite their physical and emotional trauma: Now, therefore, be it
2

•HRES 555 IH

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives ex2 presses its recognition of the suffering and hardship en3 dured by American civilian prisoners of war during World

4 War II and extends its sympathies to these brave men and

5 women and their families.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: J.D., A MINOR

PETITION OF: M.S.

:

:

:

:

:

No. 34 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of March, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-2529

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Miqueal Harwell

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Missouri

 ____________

 Submitted: November 27, 2023

Filed: November 30, 2023

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Miqueal Harwell appeals the district court’s1

 denial of his motion to suppress

evidence after he pled guilty to a firearm offense, pursuant to a plea agreement that

includes an appeal waiver. His counsel moved to withdraw and filed a brief under

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Upon careful review , we conclude the appeal waiver is valid, enforceable, and

applicable to the issue raised in this appeal. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702,

704 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing validity and applicability of appeal waiver de novo);

United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (enforcing

appeal waiver if appeal falls within scope of waiver, defendant knowingly and

voluntarily entered into plea agreement and waiver, and it would not result in

miscarriage of justice). We have also independently reviewed the record under

Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1998), and found no non-frivolous issues for appeal

falling outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

based on the appeal waiver and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________

1The Honorable Stephen R. Clark, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Missouri, adopting the Report and Recommendation of the

Honorable Noelle C. Collins, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District

of Missouri.

-2-
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 63 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 63

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Ways and Means 
                   in the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 1997

 Mr. Archer submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Ways and Means 
                   in the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Ways and Means (hereinafter in 
this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $11,163,529 for the One Hundred 
Fifth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $$5,472,622 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 1997, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 1998; and
            (2) not more than $5,690,907 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 1998, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 1999.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Oversight.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Oversight.
                                 <all>
```
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

OF MARYLAND

Misc. Docket AG No. 59 September Term, 2015

Misc. Docket AG No. 12 September Term, 2016

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION

OF MARYLAND

v.

BONNIE ELIZABETH PLANK

Barbera, C.J. G reene Adkins McDonald Watts Hotten Getty
,

JJ.

PER CURIAM ORDER

Filed: April 4 , 2017 Circuit Court for Baltimore County Case No. 03

- C

- 15

- 0 14239 Case No. 03

- C

- 16

- 00 6873 Argued: April 4 , 201 7ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * In the

COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * Court of Appeals

v. * of Maryland

* Misc. Docket AG No. 59 September Term, 2015 BONNIE ELIZABETH PLANK

* Misc. Docket AG No. 12 September Term, 2016

PER CURIAM ORDER

For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it

is this 4th day of April 201 7 , ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the

Respondent, Bonnie Elizabeth Plank be, and s he is hereby, disbarred,

effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State

of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of

Bonnie Elizabeth Plank from the register of attorneys, and pursuant

to Maryland Rule 19

- 761 , shall certify that fact to the Trustees

of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals

in the State; and it is further

ORDERED that Respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the

Clerk of this Court, including the costs of all transcripts, pursuant

to Maryland Rule 19

- 7 09 , for which sum judgment is entered in favor

of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against Bonnie

Elizabeth Plank.

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge
EXHIBIT
31.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




SECTION
302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




March 26,
2010




I, Thomas
A. Davidson, Vice President and senior officer in charge of securitization of
CDF Funding, Inc., certify that:




1.           I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K
and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10–K of GE Dealer Floorplan Master Note Trust
(the ‘‘Exchange Act periodic reports’’);




2.           Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act
periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;




3.           Based on my knowledge, all of the
distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form
10–D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
periodic reports;




4.           Based on my knowledge and the servicer
compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,
and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements;
and




5.           All of the reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related
attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance
with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have
been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in
this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in
such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
10–K.









In giving
the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me
by the following unaffiliated party:  Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas.







/s/
Thomas A.
Davidson


Name:
Thomas A. Davidson


Title:  
Vice President and senior officer in charge of securitization