alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(5) EFFECTIVENESS. This Supplemental Indenture shall be effective upon execution by theparties hereto.          (6) RECITALS. The recitals contained herein shall be taken as the statements of the Companyand the Subsidiary Guarantors.          **(7) NEW YORK LAW TO GOVERN. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED INACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK BUT WITHOUT GIVING EFFECT TO APPLICABLEPRINCIPLES OF CONFLICTS OF LAW.**          (8) COUNTERPARTS. The parties may sign any number of copies of this Supplemental Indenture.Each signed copy shall be an original, but all of them together represent the same agreement.          (9) EFFECT OF HEADINGS. The Section headings herein are for convenience only and shall notaffect the construction hereof.* * * * *
2

 
          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Supplemental Indenture to be duly executed asof the date first written above.      **CVG ALABAMA, LLC**
EXHIBIT 32.2

     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
   1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


   In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 of BrightStar Information Technology
Group, Inc. (the "Form 10-Q"), I, John Coogan, Chief Financial Officer, of
BrightStar Information Technology Group, Inc., certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

   (1) such Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
      ended March 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of BrightStar Information
      Technology Group, Inc.


   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to BrightStar Information Technology
Group, Inc. and will be retained by BrightStar Information Technology Group,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


Date: May 16, 2005                          BY: /s/ John Coogan
                                                John Coogan
                                                Chief Financial Officer
cei

Qoer ask

ED JUDGE KENDALL
F = a MAGISTRATE JUDGE runnreg /hU

= UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
~ THOMAS MAS G. BRI COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
STRICT C
CLERK, US. DI

DESIGNATION SHEET FOR CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

I, Is this an indictment or information arising out of offenses charged in one or more
previously-filed complaints signed by a magistrate judge? Yes (You must answer 1b even if
the answer is No)

la. If the answer is “Yes,” list the case number and title of the earliest filed
complaint: United States v. Pegues, 20 CR 256 Masyshat “a ftZ

lb. Should this indictment or information receive a ne se number from the
court? No
2. Is this an indictment or information that supersedes one or more previously-filed

indictments or informations? No

2a. If the answer is “Yes,” list the case number and title of the earliest filed
superseded indictment or information and the name of the assigned judge (Local Rule

40.3(b)(2)):
3. Is this a re-filing of a previously dismissed indictment or information? No

4. Is this a case arising out of the failure of the defendant to appear in a criminal
proceeding in this Court? No

5. Is this a transfer of probation supervision from another district to this District? No
6. What level of offense is this indictment or information? Felony

ue Does this indictment or information involve eight or more defendants? No

8. Does this indictment or information include a conspiracy count? No

9. Identify the type of offense that describes the count, other than any conspiracy count,

with the most severe penalty: III
10. List the statute of each of the offenses charged in the indictment or information.

18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)
Mh () lak

MATTHEW/J. McCROBIE
Assistant Urfited States Attorney
#### Fritzy Rawbold, etc., *v.*Wm. Wilson.

Taxation — Distress—Receipt Presented.

Before an officer can distrain for taxes lie must tender to tlie taxpayer a receipt specifying the taxable estate with, which he is charged, the value and amount thereof and the taxes due.

APPEAL FROM HARDIN CIRCUIT COURT.

December 21, 1870.

*Winter smith & Cofer, for appellants.*

*Wilson, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

After a careful examination of the very elaborate pleadings and arguments in this case, we conclude that as it appears from the answer and receipt filed as a part thereof that the marshal who made the distress for the taxes claimed did not before he made said distress tender to appellee a receipt specifying the taxable estate with which he was charged, the value, and amount thereof, and the tax due, as it was his duty to do under sec. 26 of the Act of February 26, 1868, to incorporate the town of Elizabethtown, and the court below correctly sustained the demurrer to part of the answer.

The constitutionality of said act, and the propriety of the finding of the jury, are questions not before us on this appeal, and upon which we express no opinion.

Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, the undersigned, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:


    o   the  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Perfisans  Holdings,  Inc. (the
        "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2004,  fully complies with
        the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange
        Act of 1934; and

    o   the  information  contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly  presents,  in all
        material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of
        the Company.



Date: May 19, 2005


/s/ To-Hon Lam
----------------------------
To-Hon Lam
Chief Executive Officer &
Principal Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 11

NB CAPITAL CORPORATION
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE(in thousand of US dollars)

|                               | Three-month period
ended
September 30, 2004 | Three-month period
ended
September 30, 2003
|------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------
|                               |                                            
|Net income                     |                                             | $8,742                                     
|Deduct: Senior preferred stock |                                            
|and series A preferred         |                                            
|stock dividends                |                                             | 6,267                                      
|                               |                                            
|Common share outstanding       | (A)                                         | $2,475                                     
|                               | (B)                                         | 100                                        
|                               |                                            
|Earning per share              | (A/B)                                       | $     25                                   
|                              

---
Lexter Kossie#700661

William McConnell Unit

3001 South Emily Drive

rBeeville, Texas 78102

April 26, 2015

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

P.O. BOX 12308, Capitol Station

Austin, Texas 78711

RE: WR NOs. 10,978-01 thru 10,978-16

Tr.Ct.NOs- 679887-A thru 679887-K

185th District Court - Harris County

t0lCtl&~0\l07,O3,uy&®pU)-3j

COURT QFCRIMINAL APPEAi

APR 29 2Q15

Ab*Wcesfr,Cterk

Dear Clerk:

Recently I have been cited for abuse of the writ. In

order for me to show that the claims I intend to raise in my

subsequent writ are not barred by Sec 4 I am requesting the

docket sheet of all the writs mentioned above with a list of

all of the claims presented in each of those application. With

out a list of all of the claims I cannot show that the claims

I intend to raise have not been raised before in those prior

applications.

Thank you for any consideration given in this matter.

Sincerely,

cc:File Lexttr- Kennon Kossie

A'..
Order entered August 14, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01000-CV

RUSSELL D. ABEREGG, Appellant

V.

MONICA CESCHAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-12-00023

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s August 1, 2013 motion for clarification of this Court’s 

order dated July 2, 2013. Appellant believes this Court ordered him to file an amended brief by 

August 1, 2013. He now seeks a thirty day extension of time to file a brief. 

Appellant filed a brief on May 20, 2013. On May 23, 2013, this Court sent appellant a 

defective brief notice and instructed him to file an amended brief correcting the deficiencies 

within ten days. Appellant did not file an amended brief as instructed. On July 2, 2013, we 

ordered that the appeal would be submitted on the brief appellant initially filed and ordered it 

filed as of the date of the order. This Court then stated that appellee’s brief was due within thirty 

days. Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s motion to the extent that he requests an extension of 

time to file a brief.

/s/ DAVID LEWIS 

JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT
      35.2**




**ANNUAL
      SERVICER’S CERTIFICATE**




**GE
      DEALER FLOORPLAN MASTER NOTE TRUST**




March
      26,
      2008




The
      undersigned, a duly authorized officer of GE Commercial Distribution Finance
      Corporation (“ CDF ”),
      as
      the sub-servicer (the “ Sub-Servicer ”),
      pursuant to the Amended and Restated Sub-Servicing Agreement dated as of August
      10, 2006 (as may be further amended and supplemented from time to time, the
      “ Agreement ”),
      between General Electric Capital Corporation and CDF, does hereby certify
      that:




1.  CDF
      is,
      as of the date hereof, Sub-Servicer under the Agreement.





2.  The
      undersigned is an authorized officer who is duly authorized pursuant to the
      Agreement to execute and deliver this certificate to the GE Dealer Floorplan
      Master Note Trust.





3.  A
      review
      of the activities of Sub-Servicer during the fiscal year ended December 31,
      2007
      (the “reporting period”), and of its performance under the Agreement, has been
      made under my supervision.





4.  To
      the
      best of my knowledge, based on such review, Sub-Servicer has fulfilled all
      of
      its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
      reporting period.







IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate the date
      first above written.




/s/
              Robert MartinName:
                  Robert Martin
                Title:President
                  of GE Commercial
                Distribution
                  FinanceCorporation
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certificationof Chief Financial Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of First ConsultingGroup, Inc., a Delaware, corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to hisknowledge, that:

 

(i)             theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedJune 25, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)          theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: August 4, 2004 | /s/ WALTER J. MCBRIDE                                |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                       | Walter J. McBride                                    |
|                       | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany theReport pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No.33-8238.  This certification shall notbe deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be incorporated by reference in anyfiling of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whethermade before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporationlanguage in such filing.

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Howard Cohan

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04695

Honorable Charles R. Norgle Sr.

Bolingbrook Motel, Inc.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, February 10, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles R. Norgle: Pursuant to Rule

41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this case is voluntarily dismissed

with prejudice and without costs or fees being assessed by the Court [11]. Civil case

terminated. Mailed notice(ewf, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04695 Document #: 12 Filed: 02/10/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:35
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**12 CAF 13-01327**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTIAN L. JONES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LAURA S. TUCKER, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE, HANCOCK ESTABROOK, LLP (ALAN J. PIERCE OF COUNSEL), PRO BONO APPEALS PROGRAM, ALBANY, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

MARRIS & BARTHOLOMAE, P.C., SYRACUSE (WILLIAM R. BARTHOLOMAE OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

SUSAN B. MARRIS, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, MANLIUS.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (Salvatore Pavone, R.), entered May 16, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, awarded petitioner sole legal and physical custody of the subject child.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as it concerns visitation is unanimously dismissed and the order is affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: We affirm the order granting the petition seeking modification of a prior order of custody for reasons stated in the decision at Family Court. We note only that a subsequent order of the same court, entered July 22, 2014, which modified the provisions regarding visitation, has rendered moot the contention of respondent mother that the court erred in failing to provide her with more extensive visitation ( see Matter of Kirkpatrick v Kirkpatrick , 117 AD3d 1575, 1576).

Entered: February 6, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 31.1****

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Bok Wong, chief executive officer and principal accounting officer of Perfisans Holdings, Inc., certify that: 

          1)          I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Perfisans Holdings, Inc. (the “small businessissuer”); 

          2)          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

          3)          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

          4)          I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have: 

          a.          Designed      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls      and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material      information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly      during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

           b.          Evaluated      the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls      and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period      covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

           c.          Disclosed      in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal      control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business      issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,      or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s      internal control over financial reporting. 

          5)          I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the smallbusiness issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

          a.          All      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation      of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely      to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record,      process, summarize and report financial information; and 

           b.          Any      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees      who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal      control over financial reporting.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. James PAIGE, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-7382.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 2004.

Decided Dec. 23, 2004.

James Paige, Appellant pro se. Michael R. Smythers, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

James Paige seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying a petition for clem*276eney, which was filed by Paige’s mother and his aunt and construed by the district court as a motion for modification of Paige’s criminal sentence. The district court denied the motion on its merits. Because Paige is not a party to or an intervenor in the proceeding filed by his relatives, he lacks standing to challenge that decision on appeal. *Davis v. Scott,*176 F.3d 805 (4th Cir.1999) (holding that federal prisoner did not have standing to appeal dismissal of habeas corpus petition filed by his wife “on behalf of’ her husband). Accordingly, we dismiss Paige’s appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2001.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Delek Resources, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leonard
Sternheim, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 22, 2005

                                /s/ Leonard Sternheim
                                ------------------------
                                Leonard Sternheim,
                                Chief Accounting Officer
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-132418)pertaining to the 2003 and 2006 Stock Option and Incentive Plans of Eagle Test Systems, Inc. of ourreports dated December 3, 2007 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and scheduleof Eagle Test Systems, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofEagle Test Systems, Inc. included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September30, 2007./s/  Ernst & Young LLPChicago, IllinoisDecember 3, 2007
70