alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 41609 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MANUEL DE JESUS RODRIGUEZ

- ROJAS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:15

- CR

- 562

- 1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Manuel De Jesus Rodriguez

- Rojas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez

- Ro jas h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 18, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-41609 Document: 00514122090 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2017No. 16

- 41609

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s

m otion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-41609 Document: 00514122090 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2017
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 24, 2011 

y1017 

Order 

 

October 24, 2011 

143476 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143476 

 COA: 303612 

Lapeer CC: 10-010328-FH 

CHRISTOPHER JOHN MASTERS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 3, 2011 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of American Patriot Financial Group, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William J. Smead, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

/s/ WILLIAM J. SMEAD William J. Smead Interim Chief Executive OfficerAmerican Patriot Financial Group, Inc.
April 15, 2009


---



QuickLinks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

JOSEPH TULL, ) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) 

) 

v. ) Civil Case No. 10-629 (RJL) 

) 

OFFICE OF THE ARCHITECT OF ) 

THE CAPITOL, ) 

) 

STEPHEN AYERS, the Architect of the ) 

Capitol, in his personal capacity, ) 

) 

REBECCA TISCIONE, a retired ) 

employee of the Architect of the ) 

Capitol, in her personal capacity, ) 

) 

EVELYN GOODWIN, an employee of ) 

the Architect of the Capitol, in her ) 

personal capacity, ) 

) 

TONDA CAVE, an employee of the ) 

Architect of the Capitol, in her personal ) 

capacity, ) 

) 

EDGARD MARTINEZ, an employee of ) 

the Architect of the Capitol, in his ) 

personal capacity, ) 

) 

and ) 

) 

WILLIAM MILLER, an employee of ) 

the Architect of the Capitol, in his ) 

personal capacity, ) 

) 

Dekndanh. ) 

ORDER 
F or the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this 

A ~ 1ay of August, 2011, hereby 

ORDERED that the defendants' Motion to Dismiss [#8] is GRANTED; it is 

further 

ORDERED that the above-captioned case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 

SO ORDERED. 

United States District Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         2,448
<SECURITIES>                                   901,196
<RECEIVABLES>                                  21
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               903,665
<PP&E>                                         12,250
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 915,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          128,858
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       13,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     774,057
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   915,915
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               37,430
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (37,430)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (37,430)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (37,430)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.00)



</TABLE>
Please select one of the following training courses:

Fundamentals of Metrology 

ITS-90 Realization, Industrial Platinum Resistance Thermometers and Uncertainty Training

Dimensional Metrology 

Time and Frequency

Benefits Statement

Please discuss how the training will help meet goals or objectives of your institute. How will your institute incorporate the lessons learned 

during the training into new or existing services? 

2016 NIST SPONSORED 

METROLOGY COURSE SERIES 

Applicant Information

Name: Email:

Affiliated Institute: Country:

Title:

Management Approval

Name of Supervisor: Signature: 

Priority ranking* (if applicable): 

*If your institute is submitting more than 1 application for the same training opportunity, please specify a priority rank for each application 

Once completed, please email to Andrew Conn at andrew.conn@nist.gov. Please include CV with application.
Exhibit 32.1












CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Annual Report of Ecolocap Solutions Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Michael Siegel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated this 15th day of April, 2014.






MICHAEL SIEGELMichael SiegelChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC (the Company) for the
year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick Bratton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 26, 2008



/s/ Patrick BrattonPatrick BrattonChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
IM 

SISTEMA 

INTERAMERICANO 

DE METROLOGlA. 

APPROVAL OF 

QUALITY MANAGEMENT 

SYSTEM 

APROBACIÓN DEL SISTEMA DE 

GESTIÓN DE LA CALIDAD 

National Institute of Standards of Technology (NIST) – USA 

Electricity and Magnetism – Radio Frequency Measurements 

The Quality Management System supporting measurement 

services, as defined in a motion of the Quality System Task 

Force (QSTF), has been reviewed and found to be in 

conformance with the requirement of ISO/IEC 17025:2017 

under the mandate of the Inter-American Metrology System in 

support of the expectations of the CIPM Mutual Recognition 

Arrangement. 

Sally Bruce, Quality System Task Force Chair 

Claire Saundry, President, SIM 

El Sistema de Gestión de Calidad en que se apoyan los servicios 

de medición, según se define en una moción del Grupo de 

Trabajo del Sistema de Calidad (QSTF), ha sido revisado y se 

ha determinado que cumple con los requisitos de ISO/IEC 

17025:2017 bajo mandato del Sistema Interamericano de 

Metrología en apoyo de las expectativas del Acuerdo de 

Reconocimiento Mutuo del CIPM. 

Approval date: 22 April 2021 

Expiration date: 22 April 2026
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0341

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

SAMUEL RICHARD BONKO,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 9, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 31 2022

01/31/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0341
9609.

#### Mayer *v.*Walker *et al.*

Decided January 14, 1919.

Complaint; from Spalding superior court—Judge Searcy. February 9, 1918.

*Albert B. Mayer,*for plaintiff, cited:

*Sheppard, v. Bridges,*supra; *L. & N. R. Co. v. Nelson,*145 *Ga.*594; *Union Realty Trust Co.*v. *Wright,*138 *Ga.*703; *Beall v. McGrady,*32 *Ga.*257; *Dallas v. Heard,*32 *Ga.*604; *Leffler Co. v. Lane,*146 *Ga.*741; Pomeroy, Eq. Jur. § 1207; South Carolina Ins. Co. *v.*Kohn, 95 S. E. 65; Civil Code (1910), §§ 5408, 5406; *Ga. R. Co.*v. *Tice,*124 *Ga.*463; *DeLacy v. Hurst,*83 *Ga.*229-30; *Teasley v. Bradley,*110 *Ga.*505 (4).

Jenkins, J.

This was a suit against E. W. Bingham and Mrs. Laura L. Walker upon promissory notes given by Bingham to the plaintiff for the purchase-price of certain real estate, for which the plaintiff gave to him a bond for title. It. is alleged in the-petition that Bingham subsequently sold the real estate to defend'ant Laura L. Walker, and transferred to her the bond for title, and that, as a part of the consideration of the transfer, Laura L. Walker assumed the payment of the notes given to the plaintiff. The petition. prayed for a judgment against both defendants for the amount due upon the notes, together with attorney’s fees. Bingham' filed no-defense. Laura L. Walker demurred to the petition, on the ground that “It is not, alleged that this defendant made any promise to the plaintiff, or that there was any consideration moving from the plaintiff to this defendant.” This demurrer the trial court sustained, and the plaintiff excepted. *Held:*

1. The writ of error in this case having been originally filed in the Supreme Court, and having been by that court transferred to this court, such action by the Supreme Court was equivalent to a holding that the plaintiff’s petition was not an equitable proceeding, but an action at • law.

2. Whatever may be the plaintiff’s rights in a proper equitable proceeding, she can not maintain the present legal remedy, by which it is sought to enforce a contract to which the plaintiff was not a party, and which was made between other and different parties. *Sheppard*v. *Bridges,*137 *Ga.*615 (74 S. E. 245); *McKenzie v. McKenzie,*23. *Ga. App.*27 (97 S. E. 410).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.*

*186*E. M. & G. F. Mitchell,*for defendants, cited:

*Hawkins*v. *Con. R. Co.,*119 *Ca.*160 (6); Civil Code (1910), §§ 4249, 5516; *Sheppard*v. *Bridges,*supra; *Union City Realty Co.*v. *Wright,*supra;*Steed*v. *Savage,*115 *Ga.*101; *Copeland*v. *Cheney,*116 *Ga.*687; *Fowler*v. *Davis,*120 *Ga.*445, 687; *Pound v. Smith,*146 *Ga.*435; *McKenzie*v. *Flannery,*90 *Ga.*597.
Exhibit 32.2











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the amended Annual Report of Ecolocap Solutions Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A-1 for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Michel St-Pierre, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 11th day of May, 2010




MICHEL ST-PIERREMichel St-PierreChief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 220 (Friday, November 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 68252]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26912]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Board of Scientific Counselors, Office of Infectious Diseases 
(BSC, OID)

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC), announces the following meeting of the aforementioned 
committee:

    Time and Date: 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m., December 10, 2014.
    Place: CDC, Global Communications Center, 1600 Clifton Road NE., 
Building 19, Auditorium B3, Atlanta, Georgia 30333.
    Status: The meeting is open to the public, limited only by the 
space available.
    Purpose: The BSC, OID, provides advice and guidance to the 
Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services; the Director, 
CDC; the Director, OID; and the Directors of the National Center for 
Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, the National Center for 
Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, and the National Center 
for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, CDC, in the 
following areas: Strategies, goals, and priorities for programs; 
research within the national centers; and overall strategic 
direction and focus of OID and the national centers.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include reports from 
the BSC, OID working groups; brief updates on priorities/activities 
of CDC's infectious disease national centers; and a focused 
discussion on public health issues arising from long-term outbreak 
response efforts.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for More Information: Robin Moseley, M.A.T., 
Designated Federal Officer, OID, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road NE., 
Mailstop D10, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Telephone: (404) 639-4461.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Claudette Grant,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2014-26912 Filed 11-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE><ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted from the Company's report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,660
<SECURITIES>                                     3,253
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       116
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,913
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,147
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              159
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,936
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,147
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   695
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   806
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (111)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (111)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (111)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  $(0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  $(0.02)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03758

Honorable Thomas M. Durkin

Long Leaf Trading Group, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, September 28, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: The telephone status

hearing set for 10/6/2021 is vacated. Mailed notice. (ecw, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 75 Filed: 09/28/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:582
9568.

#### Case Threshing Machine Company *v.*Binns.

Jenkins, J.

1. It appearing, from the evidence, that the witness for the defendant did. not himself sell to the plaintiff the items attempted to be set off and shown in the itemized statement attached to his interrogatories, that he had no personal knowledge of such items, and that his only knowledge of the correctness of the account was derived from the books of the company alone, the correctness of the account was not sufficiently proved, and the court did not err in excluding the itemized statement. *Dougan*v. *Dunham,*115 *Ga.*1012 (42 S. E. 390) ; *Swift*v. *Oglesby,*8 *Ga. App.*540 (70 S. B. 97).

2. The only living subscribing witness to the contract introduced by the defendant not having been produced, the mere statement of counsel for the defendant, not under oath, that the witness was no longer in the employ of the defendant, and that he did not know where to look for him, was not a sufficient showing that the witness was inaccessible, and *47the court did not err in refusing to admit the contract in evidence. *Dunaway*v. *Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.,*142 *Ga.*383 (82 S. E. 1071).

Decided November 12, 1918.

Complaint; from city court of Washington—Judge Wynne. February 8, 1918.

*W. A. Slaton,*for plaintiff in error.

*Colley & Colley,*contra.

3. Ordinarily an agent to sell earns his commission only when he finds a customer ready, able, and willing to buy on the terms stipulated by the principal (Civil Code of 1910, § 3587; *Harvil*v. *Wilson,*11 *Ga. App.*156 (74 S. E. 845) ; but the principal can not, with knowledge of the negotiations between the purchaser and the agent, and while such negotiations are still pending, defeat the right of the agent to recover such commission by interfering with and himself *completing*the sale of which the agent was the procuring cause. *Doonan*v. *Ives,*73 *Ga.*295; *Gresham*v. *Connally,*114 *Ga.*906 ( 41 S. E. 42) ; *Hill*v. *Wheeler,*2 *Ga. App,*349 (58 S. E. 502) ; *Graves*v. *Hunnicutt,*8 *Ga. App.*99 (68 S. E. 558).

4. There was sufficient evidence to authorize the jury to find that the plaintiff was the procuring cause of the sales on which he claimed commissions, although the sales were actually consummated by the defendant company itself, acting through its other agents, while negotiations between the purchaser and the plaintiff were still pending; and' the evidence authorized the verdict against the defendant, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*■Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.*
No. 87-1378.

#### Evans *v.*Connecticut.

Sup. Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied.