alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Daniel Subir BAROI, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-71298.

Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 10, 2004.*

Decided Dec. 16, 2004.

Suzanne B. Friedman, Attorney at Law, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration *&*Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Lyle D. Jentzer, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., William K. Olivier, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before KOZINSKI, W. FLETCHER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Daniel Subir Baroi petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), affirming without opinion the decision of the immigration judge (“IJ”). The IJ denied Baroi’s applications *602for asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture relief.1

We deny the petition because there was substantial evidence for the IJ to find that Baroi was firmly resettled in another country prior to coming to the United States. *See Cheo v. INS,*162 F.3d 1227, 1229-30 (9th Cir.1998). Baroi was granted permanent resident status in the Philippines, where he lived for ten months. This raised a presumption that he was firmly resettled there, which he failed to rebut. Thus, Baroi is barred from seeking asylum in the United States. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(2)(A)(vi); *Cheo,*162 F.3d at 1229-30.

The petition for review is DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Baroi does not appeal the IJ’s denial of relief under the Convention Against Torture or his withholding of removal claim.
EXHIBIT 13.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of GOL LINHAS AÉREAS INTELIGENTES S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paulo Sergio Kakinoff, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: April 28, 2016 By:               /s/PauloSergio KakinoffName:Paulo Sergio KakinoffTitle:Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of DDi Corp.  (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Joseph P. Gisch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| 1.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  
 
2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

Date: November 13, 2002

By:

/s/ JOSEPH P. GISCH

 
 
 
 
 
 
**Joseph P. Gisch Chief Financial Officer**

 
  |
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of A.L.J., A.L.J., G.A.G.

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00251

- CV

Trial court case number: 2017

- 04601J

Trial court: 315th District Court of Harris County

This is an accelerated appeal from an order terminating appellant’s parental rights. Appellant’s appointed counsel claims that, while drafting the brief, she realized that she had served as a visiting judge in one of the trial court hearing s in this case . Accordingly, appointed counsel has filed a motion to abate and remand to the trial court for appointment of new counsel for appellant. The motion is granted.

This appeal is abated and the cause remanded to the trial court for appointment o f new counsel for appellant. The trial court shall cause a supplemental clerk’s record containing its order appointing new counsel

, including the name, address, telephone number, and State Bar number of

substitute counsel within 10 days of the date of this order . If the trial court holds a hearing, the

trial court shall also cause a reporter’s record of the hearing to be filed in this Court within 1 5 days of the date of this order

. The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case

, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when a supplemental clerk’s record that complies with this order, and the reporter’s record of the hearing, have been filed in this Court.

It is so OR DERED.

Judge’s signature:

___

/s/ Peter Kelly

_____  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___ June 4, 2019

__
JOLIET000007Ex. 2

Case: 1:20-cv-04545 Document #: 124-2 Filed: 06/15/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:2670

JOLIET000008

Case: 1:20-cv-04545 Document #: 124-2 Filed: 06/15/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:2671
#### Elijah B. Cobb v. Rosamond M. Cook et al.

*Bill to reach lands must be based, upon title.*

A bill in equity to reach lands of which complainant claims to have been defrauded cannot be sustained where complainant does not prove any title. And the defect cannot be cured by proof that defendant, after bidding in the lands at an execution sale against complainant, had verbally agreed to hold them for him, such a parol trust being .void under Comp. L., §§ 4120, 4714.

Appeal from Eaton.

Submitted June 16.

Decided June 21.

Bill to set aside deed. Complainant appeals.

Affirmed.

*George W. Mead*for complainant.

*E. A. Foote*for defendant.

Cooley, J.

This is a bill in equity to reach lands of which complainant claims he has been defrauded by one Jacob B. Cook, under whom defendants claim. A fatal defect in complainant’s case is, that he does not prove any title whatever.

It is sought to avoid this objection by proof showing that the lands were sold on execution against complainant and bid in by Cook, who agreed to hold them for complainant. But this evidence only made out a parol trust, which was void under the statute. Comp. L., §§ 4120, 4114.

The decree is affirmed with costs.

G-raves, O. J. and Campbell, J. concurred.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

 ) No. 20 CR 309

LARRY JONES, )

) Judge Virginia M. Kendall

Defendant. )

MOTION TO MODIFY DEFENDANT JONES’ BOND ALLOWING 

HIM TO LIVE IN HIS HOME WITH THE MOTHER OF HIS SON 

AND HIS SON, MAKING HER HIS THIRD PARTY CUSTODIAN, 

AND OTHER CONDITIONS AS SUGGESTED BY PRETRIAL 

SERVICES

 Defendant Larry Jones, by his attorney, Phillip A. Turner, respectfully 

requests that this court enter an order modifying defendant Jones’ bond to 

allow him to reside at his home with his son and his son’s mother, making 

her his third party custodian, and other conditions as suggested by Pretrial 

Services. In support of this motion, defendant states the following:

1. Defendant Larry Jones has been completely compliant with all 

conditions of his bond. Defense counsel has contacted the pretrial services 

officer, Samuel Schroeder, to discuss proposed changes in defendant Jones’ 

bond, however, the officer cannot investigate the feasibility of changes 

without a motion being filed. 
2

2. Currently, defendant Jones resides with his grandmother, Jeraldine 

Moore, who is 79 years old in Chicago, Illinois. She has some pre-existing 

medical conditions such as diabetes, heart issues, and anxiety. She does not 

work. Defendant Jones does work every day performing manual labor at 

various sites with 10 to 20 other laborers. He is in close contact with these 

other individuals. When he is at his grandmother’s home, he tries to 

maintain his distance from her to try to avoid infecting her with COVID-19. 

3. His son and his son’s mother, Shinesha Huston, reside in 

Broadview, Illinois where defendant Jones lived prior to his arrest. She and 

defendant Jones have been together for 20 years and lived at this location for 

approximately 6 years. Their son is a senior at Willowbrook High School. 

Wherefore, defendant respectfully requests that this Court enter an 

order allowing Pretrial Services to investigate and make the suggested 

modifications to defendant Jones’s bond if Pretrial Services believes that 

they are appropriate as well as any other modifications. 

Respectfully submitted,

Phillip A. Turner 

/s/Phillip A. Turner____

Attorney for defendant

20 North Clark Street

Suite 3300

Chicago, Illinois 60602

312-899-0009
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 The undersigned attorney hereby certifies that in accordance with 

Fed.R.Civ.P.5, LR 5.5 and the General Order on Electronic Case Filing 

(ECF), the following document:

MOTION TO MODIFY DEFENDANT JONES’ BOND ALLOWING 

HIM TO LIVE IN HIS HOME WITH THE MOTHER OF HIS SON 

AND HIS SON, MAKING HER HIS THIRD PARTY CUSTODIAN, 

AND OTHER CONDITIONS AS SUGGESTED BY PRETRIAL 

SERVICES 

was served pursuant to the district court’s ECF system as to ECF filers.

 

 Respectfully submitted,

Phillip A. Turner_________

Phillip A. Turner

Attorney for defendant

20 North Clark Street

Suite 3300

Chicago, Illinois 60602

312-899-0009
### CAUSE NO. 2013-CI-10278

DAVID GILLESPIE AND § IN THE DISTRICT COURT MICHAEL O’BRIEN § § v. § 408 th 

### JUDICIAL DISTRICT § A. L. HERNDEN AND § FREDERICK R. ZLOTUCHA § BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS

NOTICE OF APPEAL

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

WHEREAS ON April 2, 2015, the Honorab le Cathleen M. Stryker of the 224 th

Judicial District Bexar Court, entered a Fina l Judgment in this cause. Plaintiff, DAVID

GILLESPIE wishes to appeal from said Final Judgment to the Court of Appeals for the

Fourth District of Texas in San Antonio, Texas.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

GENE TOSCANO, INC.,

BY: /s/ Andrew E. Toscano ANDREW E. TOSCANO SBN: 00786832 846 Culebra Road, Suite 104 San Antonio, Texas 78201 210/732-6091 tel 210/735-4167 fax ATTORNEY PLAINTIFF FILED 7/3/2015 10:29:15 AM Donna Kay McKinney Bexar County District Clerk Accepted By: Consuelo GomezCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing has been sent by hand delivery to the following counsel of record on this 3 rd day of July, 2015:

Mr. Richard A. Sparr, Jr. 1313 N. E. Loop 410, Suite 100 San Antonio, Texas, 78209 SENT BY FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION TO: (210) 828-5444

Mr. Frederick R. Zlotucha 222 Main Plaza East San Antonio, Texas 78205 SENT BY FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION TO: (210) 227-8316

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS Cardena-Reeves Justice Center 300 Dolorosa Ste. 3200 San Antonio, Texas 78205 210-355-2762- fax

/s/ Andrew E. Toscano ANDREW E. TOSCANO
##### 



Exhibit 10.35
 (CVG LOGO)
    
    Corporate Headquarters
7800 Walton Parkway
New Albany, OH 43054
Main: (614) 289-5360
Fax: (614) 289-5361
 
 FORM OF
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
 
         Definitions




---



##### 



provided, however
    Agreement to Serve provided, however
 2




---



##### 



Mandatory Indemnification Section 7 provided, however , Section 7(c)
 Mandatory Advancement of Expenses Section 3 provided, however
 Maintenance of D&O Insurance
 Section 2,
 Section 5(a)
 3




---



##### 



Notice and Other Indemnification Procedures
  Section 6(a)
 provided that provided further
 Determination of Right to Indemnification
 Section 3 Section 3
 4




---



##### 



Section 3
 Section 8
  Sections 3 4
 Change In Control
  5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



Limitation of Actions and Release of Claims provided, however Section 9
 Non-exclusivity
 Settlement
  Allowance for Compliance with Commission Requirements
 7




---



##### 



Interpretation of Agreement
 Severability Section 14
 Modification and Waiver
 . Successors and Assigns
 Notices
 8




---



##### 



Governing Law
 Consent to Jurisdiction Section 7(c)
 Effectiveness
  9




---



##### 



COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC.6530 West Campus OvalNew Albany, Ohio 43054Telecopy No.: (614) 289-5361By:Its:INDEMNITEE:Name:Title:Address:Telecopy No.:
 10
EXHIBIT 32

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Perfisans Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Bok Wong, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     o    the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     o    the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Date:  August 3, 2007                             /s/ Bok Wong
                                                  ------------
                                                  Bok Wong
                                                  Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  Principal Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 457 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 202
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 457

                          [Report No. 105-566]

 Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill 
(H.R. 2709) to impose certain sanctions on foreign persons who transfer 
 items contributing to Iran's efforts to acquire, develop, or produce 
                          ballistic missiles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 1998

     Mr. Goss, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill 
(H.R. 2709) to impose certain sanctions on foreign persons who transfer 
 items contributing to Iran's efforts to acquire, develop, or produce 
                          ballistic missiles.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to take from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 2709) to impose 
certain sanctions on foreign persons who transfer items contributing to 
Iran's efforts to acquire, develop, or produce ballistic missiles, with 
the Senate amendments thereto, and to consider in the House a single 
motion offered by the chairman of the Committee on International 
Relations or his designee that the House concur in each of the Senate 
amendments. The Senate amendments and the motion shall be considered as 
read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on International Relations. The previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the motion to final adoption without intervening motion 
or demand for division of the question.
                                     

                                                 House Calendar No. 202

105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 457

                          [Report No. 105-566]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill 
(H.R. 2709) to impose certain sanctions on foreign persons who transfer 
 items contributing to Iran's efforts to acquire, develop, or produce 
                          ballistic missiles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 4, 1998

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
IV

House Calendar No. 277

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 589

[Report No. 105–806]

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to consideration

of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 9, 1998

Mr. SOLOMON, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect

to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the

Committee on Rules, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 4(b) of rule

2 XI for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported from that committee for the remainder of the sec-
2

HRES 589 RH

1 ond session of the One Hundred Fifth Congress providing

2 for consideration or disposition of any of the following:

3 (1) A bill or joint resolution making general ap4 propriations for the fiscal year ending September 30,

5 1999, any amendment thereto, any conference report

6 thereon, or any amendment reported in disagree7 ment from a conference thereon.

8 (2) A bill or joint resolution that includes provi9 sions making continuing appropriations for fiscal

10 year 1999, any amendment thereto, any conference

11 report thereon, or any amendment reported in dis12 agreement from a conference thereon.

13 SEC. 2. It shall be in order at any time for the re14 mainder of the second session of the One Hundred Fifth

15 Congress for the Speaker to entertain motions to suspend

16 the rules, provided that the object of any such motion is

17 announced from the floor at least two hours before the

18 motion is offered. In scheduling the consideration of legis19 lation under this authority, the Speaker or his designee

20 shall consult with the Minority Leader or his designee.

House Calendar No. 277

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 589

[Report No. 105–806]

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI

for other purposes.tions reported from the Committee on Rules, andwith respect to consideration of certain resoluOCTOBER 9, 1998

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

________________________

No. ACM 40253

________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Kevin E. HERNANDEZ

Airman (E-2), U.S. Air Force, Appellant

________________________

Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary

Decided 28 February 2023

________________________

Military Judge: Christina M. Jimenez.

Sentence: Sentence adjudged 9 November 2021 by GCM convened at Hill

Air Force Base, Utah. Sentence entered by military judge on 9 December

2021: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 3 months, and reduction 

to E-1.

For Appellant: Major Theresa L. Hilton, USAF.

Before KEY, ANNEXSTAD, and GRUEN, Appellate Military Judges.

________________________

This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as 

precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 30.4.

________________________

PER CURIAM:

The findings and sentence as entered are correct in law and fact, and no 

error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of Appellant occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(d), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(d). Manual for CourtsMartial, United States (2019 ed.).
United States v. Hernandez, No. ACM 40253

2

Accordingly, the findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE

Clerk of the Court
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7**  **141**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appell ee ,
v. FAHED T. TAWALBEH , Defendant

- Appell ant .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the We stern District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. James P. Jones , District Judge. ( 7:97

- cr - 00024

- JPJ

- 7; 7:14

- cv - 80755

- JPJ

- RSB; 7:14

- cv 00297

- JPJ

- RSB )

Submitted : December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Fahed T. Tawalbeh , Appellant Pro Se. Rick A. Mountcastle , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke , Virginia , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Fahed T. Tawalbeh seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (a) (2012) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion , and dismissing it on that basis . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Tawalbeh has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with o ral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED