alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David M. Engert., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of NightHawk Radiology
Holdings, Inc.



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                    
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 19, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    DAVID M. ENGERT                                             
|                         |  |  |  |     |  | David M. Engert                                                    
|                         |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
**
Exhibit No. 99.2 

[On Letterhead of Aston Bell, Certified Public Accountant] 

**Independent Accountant’s Report**

Corporate Asset Backed Corporation, (as Depositor) 

68 SouthService Road, Suite 120 

Melville, NY 11747 

U.S. Bank TrustNational Association 

Corporate Trust Services 

100 WallStreet, Suite 1600 

New York, NY 10005 

 
Re:
CABCO Series 2004-101 Trust (Goldman Sachs Capital I) (the “Trust”)

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

We have examined assertions of CorporateAsset Backed Corporation (the “Depositor”) and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, (the “Trustee” and, together with the Depositor, the “Management”) that the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all materialrespects, with the provisions of the Trust Agreement dated as of May 20, 2004, (the “Trust Agreement”) in respect of the CABCO Series 2004-101 Trust (Goldman Sachs Capital I) (the “Trust”), during the periods covered by theannual report on Form 10-K filed by the Depositor on behalf of the Trust for the year ended December 31, 2018 (the “Annual Report”). Management is responsible for compliance with the Trust Agreement. Our responsibility is to expressan opinion on Management’s assertions based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards establishedby the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Those standards require that we plan and perform the examination to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Depositor and the Trustee have complied with the Trust Agreement during theperiod covered by the Annual Report and Management’s assertions with respect to such compliance are fairly stated, in all material respects. The nature, timing, and extent of the procedures selected depend on our judgement, including examiningon a test basis, evidence about the Depositor’s and the Trustee’s compliance with the Trust Agreement and performing such other procedures as considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficientand appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

In our opinion, the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects,with the Trust Agreement during the period covered by the Annual Report and Management’s assertions with respect to such compliance are fairly stated, in all material respects, for the year ended December 31, 2018. 

 
/s/ Aston Bell, CPANew York, New YorkMarch 22, 2019**
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONFURNISHED PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Pliant Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph J. Kwederis,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
|        |     | /s/ JOSEPH J.  KWEDERIS   |
|--------|----------|---------------------------|
|   |     | Joseph J. Kwederis        |
|   | * * | *Chief Financial Officer* |
|   | * * | * *                  |
|   |     | August 14, 2007           |

#  

#  

----
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-122905,
No. 333-152027 and No. 333-160344 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 15, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of GFI Group Inc. and the effectiveness of GFI Group Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of GFI Group Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009.

/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP
New York, New York
March 15, 2010

---



QuickLinks
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-510

_____________________________

WHITNEY LEWIS CARTER,

Appellant,

v.

LLOYD CARTER,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Jackson County.

Christopher N. Patterson, Judge.

August 24, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, OSTERHAUS, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Shalene Grover, P.A., Marianna, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.
Exhibit 32.2

Polypore International, Inc.  Chief Financial Officer Certification  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Polypore International, Inc. (the "Company") for the
period ended January 2, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Lynn Amos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does
hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



By:

/s/ LYNN AMOS Lynn Amos Chief Financial OfficerDate: March 8, 2010


---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             100
<SECURITIES>                                   118,585
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               125,605
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 125,605
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,418
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                     121,153
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   125,605
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,293
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,399
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,106)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,003
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,109)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,109)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.62)


</TABLE>
STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA
                        OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE

                              CERTIFICATE OF MERGER
                          ORGANIZATIONAL ID #: DB034000

I, Chris Nelson, Secretary of State of the State of South Dakota, hereby certify
that duplicate of the Articles of Merger Hinds, Inc., an unqualified Wyoming
Corporation merging into Queen City Mobile Homes, a South Dakota corporation
duly signed and verified pursuant to the provisions of the South Dakota
corporation Acts, have been received in this office and are found to conform to
law.

ACCORDINLY and by virtue of the authority vested in me by law, I hereby issue
this Certificate of Merger and attach hereto a duplicate of the Articles of
Merger.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Great Seal of
the State of South Dakota, at Pierre, the Capital, this February 13, 2004.

/s/Chris Nelson
---------------------------------------
Chris Nelson
Secretary of State
Exhibit 32.1

Polypore International, Inc.    Chief Executive Officer Certification  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Polypore International, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended
December 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Robert B. Toth, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | By: |  | /s/ROBERT B. TOTHRobert B. Toth
President and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 14, 2007

---



QuickLinks
9804.

#### Shore Lumber Company *v.*American Lumber *&*Export Co.

Decided December 13, 1918.

Broyles, P. J.

1. The court did not err in overruling the demurrers to the amended petition. The contract on which .the suit was based, and which called for a definite number of “large” carloads of lumber of a certain kind and size at a specified price per thousand feet, was not too indefinite and uncertain to be. enforced, it appearing, as alleged in the plaintiff’s petition, that “a large carload of lumber, according to .the custom of the lumber business or trade,.means any available freight-car loaded to its fullest capacity, and is a term frequently used and so understood in the lumber business.” *Farmers Oil & Guano Co.*v. *Southern Refining Co.,*10 *Ga. App.*415 (73 8. E. 350) ; Thompson *v.*Strong (Ala.), 74 So. 34 (4); Holland-Cook Mfg. Co. *v.*Consolidated Wagon &c. Co., 49 Utah, 43 (161 Pac. 922); Kirwan *v.*Van Camp Packing Co., 12 Ind. App. 1 (39 N. E. 536). The decision in *Stewart*v. *Cook,*118 *Ga.*541 (45 S. E. 398), and the other cases cited by counsel for the plaintiff in error, are not controlling in the present case.

2. Under the facts of the case the court did not err in disallowing the proffered amendment to the defendant’s answer. .

3. No material error was committed on the trial of the case. The defendant offered! no testimony. There was no conflict in the plaintiff’s evidence, which proved the case as laid. The petition and the evidence showed that the lumber ordered by the plaintiff was for resale to its customers, that this fact was known to the defendant, and that, after the defendant had breached the contract, the plaintiff, after due notice to the defendant of its intention, bought the lumber at the lowest market price (which was, however, higher than the contract price), and sued the defendant for the difference between that price and the contract price. Under (these facts the court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff for the full amount sued for.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth, J., concurs. Stephens, J., not presiding.*

*136Action for damages; from city court of Quitman—Judge Long. April 9, 1918.

*Branch & Snow,*for plaintiff in error.

*Bennet & Harrell,*contra.

Bloodworth, J.,

concurring specially.

Under the facts of this case the verdict seems to accord with substantial justice; and while in doubt as to some of the rulings in the headnotes, yet, as the burden of showing error is upon the plaintiff in error, I concur in the judgment of affirmance. .
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

v.

LARRY JONES et. al.,

Defendants

) )

)

)

)

)

)

)

 No. 20 CR 309-1

Judge Kendall

 

MOTION FOR MODIFICATION OF BOND REMOVING THE CONDITION OF 

HOME CONFINEMENT TO CURFEW AS DIRECTED BY US PRE-TRIALWITH 

ELECTRONIC MONITORING

Defendant, Larry Jones (“Jones”), by and through his attorney, James D. Tunick, moves this 

Honorable Court for an order granting Jones a modification of his bond by replacing the condition 

of home confinement with a curfew as directed by US Pre-trial, along with location monitoring. In 

support of this motion, Jones proffers to this Court the following:

1. Jones is charged with a conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance, specifically a 

detectable amount of heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C §841(a)(1) and 21 U.S.C. § 846. 

Jones was released on an unsecured bond with home confinement and electronic 

monitoring, along with a 3rd party custodian.

2. At the time of his arrest, Jones had been working for One City United as a supervisor for 

a cleaning crew.

3. Prior to the arrest in this case, Jones had not been arrested for any offense for 14 years,

when he was arrested for driving on a suspended license. Jones has a prior felony 

conviction for possession of cocaine in 2002 and a felony conviction for attempted

murder in 1997, when Jones was 16 years old.
2

4. Jones 3

rd party custodian is the grandmother of his children. He requests a modification 

to curfew as directed with location monitoring to expand his work hours and to allow 

for more time with his children at their residence. There have been no violations while 

Jones has been on pre-trial release to date.

5. Counsel has communicated with US Pre-trial Officer Bonestroo who has indicated that 

US Pre-trial does not object to this request. However, the United States Attorneys’

office does object to this modification.

Wherefore, Defendant, Larry Jones, respectfully requests that this Honorable Court enter an 

order modifying the conditions of his bond from home detention to curfew as directed by US Pretrial Services with location monitoring.

Respectfully submitted,

/s James D. Tunick

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I James D. Tunick hereby certify that foregoing DEFENDANT LARRY JONES MOTION TO 

MODIFY THE CONDITIONS OF HIS BOND was served on September 15, 2020 in 

accordance with Fed.R.Crim.P.49(b), Fed.R.Civ.P.5(b)(2)(D), LR 5.5, Fed.R.Civ.P.5(e) and the 

General Order on Electronic Case Filing (ECF) pursuant to the district court’s system as to ECF 

filers.

s/ James D. Tunick 

LAW OFFICE OF JAMES D. TUNICK

650 N. Dearborn St 

Suite 700

Chicago, IL 60654

Tel (773)425-1657
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

| May 11, 2006

  | By:    | /s/       David A. Wheat                                                                      |   |
|----------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| (Date)

        |   | David A. Wheat

Director, Executive Vice President, and

Chief Financial Officer

  |   |
Certificate of Service for Moody Response to July 12, 2023 Court Order

BARRACK, RODOS & BACINE

STEPHEN R. BASSER (121590)

SAMUEL M. WARD (216562)

600 West Broadway, Suite 900

San Diego, CA 92101

Telephone: (619) 230-0800

Facsimile: (619) 230-1874

Attorneys for Plaintiff Michael Moody

Additional Counsel on Signature Page

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

IN RE: TIKTOK INC. CONSUMER 

PRIVACY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Moody v. TikTok, Inc. 23-cv-2465

MDL No. 2948

Master Docket No. 1:20-cv-04699

Hon. Rebecca R. Pallmeyer

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE RE: PLAINTIFF MICHAEL MOODY’S BRIEF IN 

REPSONSE TO THE COURT’S ORDER OF JULY 12, 2023

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 313 Filed: 08/14/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:14114
Certificate of Service for Moody Response to July 12, 2023 Court Order

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

In compliance with Rule 5.5(a) of Local Rules, I hereby certify that a true and correct 

copy of Plaintiff Michael Moody’s Brief in Response to the Court’s Order of July 12, 2023

was served on counsel of record via the CM/ECF system of the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Illinois on August 11, 2023.

Dated: August 14, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Stephen R. Basser

Stephen R. Basser

BARRACK, RODOS & BACINE

Stephen R. Basser

E-mail: sbasser@barrack.com

600 West Broadway, Suite 900

San Diego, CA 92101

Telephone: 619-230-0800

Attorneys for Plaintiff Moody and the Putative 

Nationwide Class and Illinois Class

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 313 Filed: 08/14/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:14115
10149.

#### Davis *v.*The State.

Luke, J.

In an application for a change of venue, “where the evidence is conflicting upon the, issue .as to whether or not under the petition such a ease is made as requires the judge to grant the motion, the judge hearing the same passes upon the issues that are to he determined upon evidence, . .' and his finding and judgment upon the same is final and controlling, unless manifestly erroneous.” *Wilburn*
      *224v. *State,*140 *Ga.*138, 141 (78 S. E. 819). See also Park’s Ann. Penal Code, § 964; *Coleman*v. *State,*141 *Ga.*737 (82 S. E. 227) ; *Bivins*v. *State,*145 *Ga.*416 (89 S. E. 370) ; *Marshall*v. *State,*20 *Ga. App.*416, 426, 427 (93 S. E. 98). In the present ease the ■ evidence before the judge of the superior court was conflicting, and it can not be said that it was manifestly erroneous to refuse to grant a change of venue.

Decided January 14, 1919.

Indictment for murder—petition for change of venue; from Burke superior court—Judge Henry C. Hammond. October 3, 1918.

*E. K. Overstreet, E. V. Heath, Joseph Law, Archibald Blackshear, C. H. & R. S. Cohen,*for plaintiff in error.

*A. L. Franklin, solicitor-general,*W. *H. Davis, H. J. Fullbright,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.*
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Thecertifications set forth below are hereby submitted to the Securities andExchange Commission pursuant to, and solely for the purpose of complying with, Section 1350of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code in connection with thefiling on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of MAIR Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”)for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”).

 

Eachof the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,respectively, of the Company, hereby certifies that, as of the end of theperiod covered by the Report:

 

1.               Such Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ PAUL F. FOLEY                     |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |
| Paul F. Foley                         |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| August 9, 2005                   |

 

 
| /s/ ROBERT E. WEIL                                    |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                  |
| Robert E. Weil                                        |
| Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| August 9, 2005                                   |

 

----
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3945

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities 

Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the 

design, planning, and construction of a project to reclaim and reuse 

wastewater within and outside of the service area of the City of Corona 

Water Utility, California. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2004

Mr. CALVERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater 

Study and Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of 

the Interior to participate in the design, planning, and 

construction of a project to reclaim and reuse wastewater 

within and outside of the service area of the City of 

Corona Water Utility, California.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CITY OF CORONA WATER UTILITY, CALIFORNIA, 

4 WATER RECYCLING AND REUSE PROJECT. 

5 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Reclamation Wastewater 

6 and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (Public Law 
2

•HR 3945 IH 

1 102–575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended 

2 by adding at the end the following new section: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 1636. CITY OF CORONA WATER UTILITY, CALIFORNIA, 

4 WATER RECYCLING AND REUSE PROJECT. 

5 ‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in coopera6 tion with the City of Corona Water Utility, California, is 

7 authorized to participate in the design, planning, and con8 struction of, and land acquisition for, a project to reclaim 

9 and reuse wastewater, including degraded groundwaters, 

10 within and outside of the service area of the City of Co11 rona Water Utility, California. 

12 ‘‘(b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost 

13 of the project authorized by this section shall not exceed 

14 25 percent of the total cost of the project. 

15 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary shall not provide 

16 funds for the operation and maintenance of the project 

17 authorized by this section.’’. 

18 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

19 in section 2 of such Act is amended by inserting after the 

20 item relating to section 1635 the following:

‘‘Sec. 1636. City of Corona Water Utility, California, water recycling and reuse 

project.’’.

Æ