alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 388

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 19, 1998.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2870) to amend the Foreign Assistance Act of

1961 to facilitate protection of tropical forests through debt

reduction with developing countries with tropical forests. The

first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one

hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on International

Relations. After general debate the bill shall be considered for

amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order

to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment

under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of

a substitute recommended by the Committee on International

Relations now printed in the bill. The committee amendment

in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. Dur-
2

•HRES 388 EH

ing consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of

the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 6 of

rule XXIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as

read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1)

postpone until a time during further consideration in the

Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any

amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum

time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without intervening business,

provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on the

first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the

conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with

such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member

may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment

adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening mo-
3

•HRES 388 EH

tion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Essix Holdings, LLC, :

Petitioner :

:

 v. : No. 683 C.D. 2021

:

Michael Dengel :

(Workers' Compensation Appeal Board), :

Respondent :

PER CURIAM 

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 12th day of May 2022, it is ordered that the abovecaptioned opinion filed on March 25, 2022, shall be designated OPINION, rather 

than MEMORANDUM OPINION, and it shall be reported.
DOC Boulder Labo

Public Meeting – January 12, 2016Department of Commerce (DOC) RepresentativesKent Rochford – Director, Communications Technology Laboratory; Boulder Laboratory Operations Director; Associate Di

Programs, NIST

Steve Salber – Director, Office of Facilities and Property Management, NIST

Virginia Holtzman‐Bell – Deputy Director, Office of Facilities and Property Management, NIST; Boulder Laboratories Site M

Susan Cantilli – Project Manager for DOC Boulder Laboratories Master Plan, Office of Facilities and Property Management

Jim Burrus – Outreach Coordinator; Boulder Meetings Support & Services Group Leader, Public Affairs Office, NIST

Edward Horton – Chief Administrative Officer, NOAAJerry Janssen – Executive Director, NOAA Boulder Laboratories

Master Planning Consultants – Metropolitan Architects and PlannersDev DuggalSusan Drew

Debargha Sengupta

Scott Keller

Environmental Consultants – ERG (Eastern Research Group)Patrick GoodwinApril Eilers
EM Field Engineering with Surface Plasmon and Spoof Surface Plasmons: from mid-IR to THz

Federico Capasso 

School of Engineering and Applied Sciences 

Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 

capasso@seas.harvard.edu

Metamaterials have opened up a new dimension in EM field engineering. Here we present new 

applications to laser physics ranging from the achievement of mid-ir quantum cascade lasers 

emitting multiple collimated beams in different directions to spoof-surface Plasmon structures 

that have been used to dramatically increase the confinement of THz waves to surfaces. The 

latter has enabled the demonstration for the first time of highly directional edge emitting THz 

lasers with high power throughput.
#### STATE v. BANKS

No. 193PA97

Case below: 125 N.C.App. 681

Motion by the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question denied 5 June 1997. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 5 June 1997.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Mercari Communications Group, Ltd. on Form 10-QSB
for the  period ending November 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the  Report), I, Robert W. Marsik, Chief
Executive/Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of my  knowledge and belief:

|(1) |  | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February
27, 2007/s/  Robert W. Marsik
Robert W. Marsik
President
(Principal Executive and
Financial Officer)

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating,  acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of  this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7055 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

THEODORE THOMAS WAGNER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (CR-02-181; CA-05-404-PMD-2)

Submitted: October 20, 2005 Decided: October 31, 2005

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theodore Thomas Wagner, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Rhett DeHart,

Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Theodore Thomas Wagner seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in

a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district

court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and

that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are

also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322,

336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Wagner has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 23.1









James Stafford
 
 
 James Stafford, Inc.
 Chartered Accountants
 Suite 350 - 1111 Melville Street
 Vancouver, British Columbia
 Canada V6E 3V6
 Telephone +1 604 669 0711
 Facsimile +1 604 669 0754
 
 
 
 
 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 
 We consent to the incorporation of our report dated 12 July 2010, except for Note 15, as to which the date is 28 July 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Rotoblock Corporation as at 30 April 2010 and 2009 and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and changes in stockholders’ equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended 30 April 2010 on Form 10-K dated 29 July 2010.
 
 
 /s/ James Stafford
 Vancouver, Canada Chartered Accountants
 
 29 July 2010
<PAGE>   1
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    -------

                                  FORM 10-Q/A

Mark One

 [X] Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
     of 1934 For Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 1996

                                       or

 [ ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
     Exchange Act of 1934

For the Transition period from _______________ to ________________

Commission File Number 1-10011

                      ASTROTECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

           Delaware                                         25-1570579
(State or other jurisdiction of                         (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                         Identification No.)

                960 Penn Avenue, Suite 800, Pittsburgh, PA 15222
              (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

       Registrant's telephone number, including area code (412) 391-1896

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

                                Yes _X_   No___

     As of January 31, 1997, there were 9,922,206 shares of the Registrant's
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, outstanding.


<PAGE>   2

                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned officers thereunto duly authorized.

                                          ASTROTECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

February 5, 1997                          By: /s/ RAYMOND T. ROYKO
                                             -----------------------------
                                             Raymond T. Royko
                                             Vice President and Secretary

                                          By: /s/ HELEN VARDY GRICKS
                                             -----------------------------
                                             Helen Vardy Gricks
                                             Treasurer and
                                             Principal Accounting Officer


                                       14
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**BG FINANCIAL GROUP,INC.CERTIFICATION—CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, T. Don Waddell, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A-1 of BG FinancialGroup, Inc.

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15eand 15d-15e) for the registrant and we have:

a)     designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)     disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a)     allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

| Date: April 30, 2007 | Signature: | /s/ T. DON  WADDELL       |
|---------------------------|------------|---------------------------|
|                      |       | T. Don Waddell            |
|                      |       | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
No. 14,825.

#### McHenry *v.*Knickerbacker et al.

Mechanic’s *Lien.*— Surety *on Gontractor’s Bond can not Enforce Lien for Materials Furnished.*— A surety on a contractor’s bond who undertakes that the contractor shall pay for all materials used in the building can not enforce a lien for materials furnished by him at the request of such contractor.

From the Dearborn Circuit Court.

*H. D. McMullen, G. M. Roberts*and *C. W. Stapp,*for appellant.

*J. K. Thompson*and *A. Q. Jones,*for appellees.

Elliott, J.

The appellant, in his complaint, alleges that he furnished materials for the erection of a building which John S. Morris had undertaken to erect for the appellees, and that notice of his intention to hold a lien was duly given and recorded. The answer of the appellees sets forth the contract with Morris, and a bond executed by the appellant and others to secure the performance of the contract by Morris, the principal contractor. The contract with Morris provided that he should furnish and pay for all materials used in the building; and further provided that the appellees might, at any time, make such alterations in the plan, or work, as they should deem proper.

*We*have no doubt as to the sufficiency of the answer. *78The appellant undertook that the principal contractor should furnish and pay for all materials used in the building, and he can not, in the face of this undertaking, demand compensation for materials furnished at the request of the contractor. It would violate the plainest principles of justice to permit the appellant to enforce a lien, for it would allow him to exact payment for property which he had explicitly promised should be paid for by another.

Filed April 11, 1891.

The reply endeavors to avoid the answer by showing that changes were made by the appellees ; but the effort is fruitless. The contract between Morris and the appellees gave them the right to make such changes as they deemed necessary, and they can not be made to suffer for doing what their contract gave them a right to do. If there had been no right to make changes, the decision in *Judah*v. *Zimmerman,*22 Ind. 388, would exert an important influence ; but the contract expressly confers such a right, and hence that case is not relevant to the matter here in dispute.

The effect of the legal principles we have stated is not changed by the fact that the appellant was one of several sureties, for he is precluded from doing what his contract forbids, and so are his co-sureties. No one of them, nor all combined, can enforce payment for materials used in the construction of the building, for the plain and unanswerable reason that they have undertaken that their principal shall pay for all materials and work.

Judgment affirmed.
Ex. B

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 67-2 Filed: 03/19/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:520
From: Jeremy Ruth

To: Platt, Joseph; Jim Falvey

Cc: Streit, Elizabeth M.; Burden, Ashley; Patrick, Joseph J

Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Forthcoming CFTC document production

Date: Thursday, March 4, 2021 10:52:55 AM

Attachments: image001.png

image002.png

image003.png

image004.png

image005.png

Joseph,

I signed up for PACER access, but I have to await a pin in the mail in order to be able to access

the system. It claims it takes 7 to 10 business days. In the meantime, I want to make sure I'm

aware of all upcoming court dates. Since I missed the last status update do to the Houston

freeze, I was hoping you could fill me in with the next court date. Moving forward, I'll be able

to access that on my own.

On another note, we obviously need to reschedule my depo. I can't commit to a date as of yet,

since I have not received discovery, but I want to make sure we are clear that the current date

is cancelled as of now. Please confirm. 

It is my understanding that there are scheduled depositions for James Donaldson and Rebecca

Wing. Are there any other scheduled depositions in addition to the two of these?

Sincerely,

Jeremy Ruth

From: Platt, Joseph <JPlatt@CFTC.gov>

Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 1:02 PM

To: Jim Falvey <jimfalvey@yahoo.com>; Jeremy Ruth <jeremysruth@hotmail.com>

Cc: Streit, Elizabeth M. <estreit@CFTC.GOV>; Burden, Ashley <ABurden@CFTC.gov>; Patrick, Joseph

J <JPatrick@CFTC.gov>

Subject: Forthcoming CFTC document production

Messrs. Falvey and Ruth –

The CFTC is preparing a very large document production (over 200 gigabytes) that will require

sending the data via hard drive, as opposed to FTP link. Please provide an address to which we

should send the hard drive where it will not be exposed to potential damage or theft. Thanks.

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 67-2 Filed: 03/19/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:521
Joseph C. Platt

Trial Attorney, Division of Enforcement

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

C: 773-241-1543

jplatt@cftc.gov

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 67-2 Filed: 03/19/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:522
10284.

#### Battle *v.*The State.

Decided June 9, 1919.

Conviction of attempt to make liquor; from Coweta superior court—Judge Terrell." December 7, 1918.

*W. G. Post,*for plaintiff in error.

*C. E. Roop, solicitor-general,*contra.

Bloodworth, J.

There is no merit in any of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for new trial; there is evidence to support the verdict, and the judgment is

*Affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.*
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-78,041-03

IN RE CARLOS GOMEZ , AK A CARLOS ULLOA, Relator

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. D-1-D C-06-301119- A IN THE 147 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM TRAVIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamu s p u rsuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. I n it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in the 147 District Court of Travi s C o unty , that more than 35 day s have elapse d, and that the

t h application has not y et bee n forwa rded to this Court. I n these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. Respondent, the District Clerk of Travis County , is or dere d to f

ile a response , which may be made by submitt ing the rec ord on such habea s corpus application, submitt ing a copy of a timely filed order which desig nates issues to be investigated ( see McCree v. Hampton , 824 S.W .2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that2

Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in Travi s C o u n t y . S hould the response include an order desig nating issues, proof of the date the district attorne y ’s o ff i ce was

serve d with the habea s application shall also be submitted with the response. T his application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abey ance until Respondent has su b m i t t ed the appropr iate re sponse. Such re sponse shall be submitted within 30 day s of the date of this order. Filed: Aug ust 27, 2014 Do not publish
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 32

Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 21, 1997

Mr. BOEHNER submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating majority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Members be, and

2 they are hereby, elected to the following standing commit3 tees:

4 COMMITTEE ON BANKING: Mr. LaTourette to rank

5 following Mr. Sessions.

6 COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE:

7 Mr. Paul, Mr. Bob Schaffer of Colorado, Mr. Peterson of

8 Pennsylvania, Mr. Upton, Mr. Deal of Georgia, Mr.

9 Hilleary, and Mr. Scarborough, all to rank in the named

10 order following Mr. Norwood of Georgia.
2

HRES 32 ATH

1 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVER2 SIGHT: Mr. Barr of Georgia to rank following Mr.

3 Snowbarger.

4 COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: Mr.

5 Brady to rank following Mr. Moran of Kansas.

6 COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES: Mr. Crapo to rank fol7 lowing Mr. Gibbons.

8 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE: Mr. Boehlert, Mr. Fawell,

9 Mrs. Morella, Mr. Weldon of Pennsylvania, Mr.

10 Rohrabacher, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Barton of Texas, Mr. Cal11 vert, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Ehlers, Mr. Weldon

12 of Florida, Mr. Salmon, Mr. Davis, Mr. Gutknecht, Mr.

13 Foley, Mr. Ewing, Mr. Pickering, Mr. Cannon, Mr. Brady,

14 and Mr. Cook.

15 COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Mr. Combest, Mr.

16 Hefley, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mrs.

17 Smith of Washington, Mr. LoBiondo, Mrs. Kelly, Mr.

18 Jones, Mr. Souder, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Ryun, Mr.

19 Snowbarger, Mr. Pappas, Mr. English, Mr. McIntosh, and

20 Mrs. Emerson.

21 COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS: Mr. Smith of

22 New Jersey, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Spence, Mr. Everett, Mr.

23 Buyer, Mr. Quinn, Mr. Bachus, Mr. Stearns, Mr. Dan

24 Schaefer of Colorado, Mr. Moran of Kansas, Mr. Cooksey,
3

HRES 32 ATH

1 Mr. Hutchinson, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Hayworth, and Mrs.

2 Chenoweth.

Æ