alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Citizens Effingham Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 Exhibit 32.1   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Citizens Effingham Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Harry H. Shearouse, President, Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    To the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
the Company. May 13, 2005/s/ Harry H. ShearouseHarry H. Shearouse
President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
#### Luther Beecher v. Edwin H. Mead et al.

*Bill in equity to recover costs.*

A bill in equity will not lie to recover in one proceeding the amount of several bills of costs for which an action at law would lie under Comp. L. § 7411. The statute provides that where plaintiff would be liable for costs, the assignee of a right of action suing in another’s *163name, or any person beneficially interested in tbe action, would be liable to the same extent; and it contemplates that a court of law shall deal with each individual case.

Appeal from "Wayne.

Submitted June 14.

Decided October 11.

Bilí, for recovery of costs. Complainant appeals.

Dismissal affirmed.

*J. P. Whittemore*for complainant.

*Levi T. Griffin*(Griffin, Dickinson, *Tlmrber <& JSosmer)*for defendant. ' ' „

Cooley, J.

This is a suit in equity. The primal object •of it is stated in the brief for complainant to be, to recover of the defendants one hundred and fifty-six bills of costs, faxed on the discontinuance of that number of suits commenced by the defendants in courts of law in the names of third persons against the plaintiff. The right of recovery is claimed under the statute, which provides that *“*when :any action shall be brought in the name of another, by an assignee of any right of action, or by any person beneficially interested in the recovery in such action, such assignee •or person shall be liable for costs in the same cases, and to the same extent, in which a plaintiff would be liable, and flie payment of such costs may be enforced by attachment in all cases where judgment is not by law required to be rendered therefor against such assignee or person interested.” ■Comp. L., § 7411.

The suits referred to were not commenced in the names •of the defendants in this bill, or of any of them, nor did they purport by the records to be for their benefit; but •complainant in his bill sets forth a complicated state of facts which he claims brings the case within the statute. 'The bill is quite voluminous, and it would be impossible to abstract it for the purposes of this opinion without filling many printed pages. We do not deem this important.

We agree with the circuit court that the case is not one *164of equity jurisdiction. Tbe court of law had ample authority to deal with each individual case, and the statute contemplated its doing so. The suggestion that a suit in equity will save a multiplicity of suits has no force ; it only adds-one to the suits before instituted.

The decree should be affirmed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.
9710.

#### Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Thompson.

Decided February 12, 1919.

Action on insurance policy; from city, court of Waycross—Judge Crawley. March 19, 1918.

*Parks & Peed,*for plaintiff in error.

*Parker & Parker,*contra.

Stephens, J.

1. The suit not having been instituted by an indorsee, assignee, transferee, or the personal representative, of a deceased person, it was error to exclude the testimony of a witness for the defendant upon the ground that his testimony purported to be as to transactions or communications with a deceased person. *Cody*v. *First National Bank,*103 *Ga.*789 (3) (30 S. E. 281). It was also error to exclude this testimony on the other grounds interposed.

2. The testimony offered by the defendant was relevant to the issue, and the court erred in excluding it and directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

3. The law of this ease was settled by this court when the case was here before. *Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.*v. *Thompson,*20 *Ga. App.*706 (93 S. E. 299).

*Judgment reversed,*

*Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3908 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3908

To provide for the conveyance of the real property located at 1081 West 
                     Main Street in Ravenna, Ohio.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 2004

 Mr. Ryan of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
              the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the conveyance of the real property located at 1081 West 
                     Main Street in Ravenna, Ohio.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE.

    The Secretary of Labor shall convey, without charge or 
consideration, to Portage County, Ohio, all right, title, and interest 
of the United States (including all Federal equity) in and to the 
parcel of real property located at 1081 West Main Street in Ravenna, 
Ohio, to the extent such right, title, or interest was acquired through 
grants to the State of Ohio under title III of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 501 et seq.) or the Wagner-Peyser Act (29 U.S.C. 49 et seq.) 
or through funds distributed to the State of Ohio under section 903 of 
the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1103).
                                 <all>
```
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3942

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 28, 2004

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 7 Commercial Boulevard in Middletown, 

Rhode Island, as the ‘‘Rhode Island Veterans Post Office 

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3942 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 7 Commercial Boulevard in Middletown, Rhode 

4 Island, is hereby redesignated as the ‘‘Rhode Island Vet5 erans Post Office Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Rhode Island Veterans Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives April 27, 2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk. 
2

HR 3942 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 7 Commercial Boulevard in Middletown, Rhode 

4 Island, is hereby redesignated as the ‘‘Rhode Island Vet5 erans Post Office Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Rhode Island Veterans Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives April 27, 2004. 

Attest: Jeff Trendahl, 

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7726

MICHAEL EDWARD FULCHER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

D. A. BRAXTON, Warden, Department of Corrections Buckingham Correctional Center; MARK L.

EARLY,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-00-468)

Submitted: April 10, 2001 Decided: April 24, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary Burnett Hatch, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Virginia

Bidwell Theisen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Edward Fulcher seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Fulcher v.

Braxton, No. CA-00-468 (W.D. Va. Nov. 2, 2000). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION





PURSUANT
TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B)





OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Annual Report of EPL Intermediate, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen E. Carley,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
      March 30, 2010/s/ Stephen E. CarleyStephen
      E. CarleyPresidentEPL
      Intermediate, Inc.





This
certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not
for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to EPL Intermediate, Inc. and will be retained by
EPL Intermediate, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 13.2

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code),
the undersigned officer of LG Display Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: April 16, 2008



/s/    JAMES
JEONGJames (Hoyoung) JeongDirector/ Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to LG Display Co., Ltd. and will be retained by LG Display Co., Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                       ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2004-9T1
             MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-9T1


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

/s/ Joseph M. Candelario                       Dated: March 29, 2005
------------------------

JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Mark Wong                                  Dated: March 29, 2005
-------------

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3931

To provide for certain tunnel life safety and rehabilitation projects for 

Amtrak. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2004

Mr. KING of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To provide for certain tunnel life safety and rehabilitation 

projects for Amtrak.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rail Tunnel Safety 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

7 There are authorized to be appropriated to the Sec8 retary of Transportation $898,000,000, to remain avail9 able until expended, for the use of Amtrak to complete 
2

•HR 3931 IH 

1 New York tunnel life safety projects and to rehabilitate 

2 tunnels in Washington, D.C. and Baltimore, Maryland. 

3 SEC. 3. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS. 

4 The Secretary shall not make funds appropriated 

5 under section 2 available to Amtrak for a project unless 

6 the Secretary has received from Amtrak and has approved 

7 an engineering and financial plan for that project. 

8 SEC. 4. INSPECTOR GENERAL REVIEW. 

9 The Inspector General of the Department of Trans10 portation shall conduct and transmit to the Congress an 

11 annual review to determine whether the expenditure and 

12 obligation of funds made available under this Act are con13 sistent with the purposes for which those funds are made 

14 available.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 8945]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Collecting Paradise: Buddhist Art of the Kashmir and its Legacies,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Mary & Leigh Block Museum of Art, Evanston, Illinois, from on or about January 13, 2015, until on or about April 19, 2015, the Rubin Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about May 22, 2015, until on or about November 30, 2015, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the imported objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

Dated: November 4, 2014.

Kelly Keiderling,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2014-26902 Filed 11-12-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

SANTO BORRERO-BEJERANO, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 564 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 24th day of November, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONFURNISHED PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Pliant Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Harold C. Bevis,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ HAROLD  C. BEVIS      |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | Harold C. Bevis           |
|   | *Chief Executive Officer* |
|   | * *                  |
|   | May 15, 2007         |

 

#  

----
JA

FILED

AUG 13 2020ra

THOMAS G BRUTON

CTERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

TERRANCE P. LINK

NO aACR 495 )

)

)

)

)

Violation: 26 U.S.C. S 7206(1)

rhe uNITED srArES ATToRNEY charges: MAGTSTHATE JUDGT C0tE

TIDGITOUI

On or about October 15, 2017, at Chicago, in the Northern District of Illinois,

Eastern Division, and elsewhere,

TERRANCE P. LINK,

defendant herein, willfully made and subscribed, and caused to be made and

subscribed, a United States Individual Income Tax Return (Form 1040 with

schedules and attachments) for the calendar year 2016, which return was verified by

written declaration that it was made under penalties of perjury and was filed with

the Internal Revenue Service, which return he did not believe to be true and correct

as to every material matter, in that said return reported on Line 22 that the total

income was $264,450, when defendant knew that the total income substantially

exceeded that amount;

In violation of Tit1e 26, United States Code, Section 7206(l).

Digitally signed by AMARJEET

AMARJEET BHACHU sHaCHu

Date: 2020.08.1 2 I 7: l8:28 -05'00'

Signed by Amarjeet S. Bhachu

on behalf of the

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

Case: 1:20-cr-00495 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/13/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1
9650.

#### Bowen *v.*Fuller & Son.

Bloodworth, J.

“Where, in an instrument in the form of a note and mortgage for the purchase-price of a mule, it is stated that the purchaser agrees to pay for the mule if it should die, and that he assumes this risk in consideration of the credit extended, and purchases on his own judgment, he is not, upon the death of the mule, entitled to prove an express *395warranty of soundness, and defeat the purehase-priee on account of a breach of such warranty.” *Cochran*v. *Jones,*11 *Ga. App.*302 (75 S. E. 143). The decision in the case just cited controls this case. The note in this case, as in that case, contained the clause, “I or we insure the good condition and safe-keeping of said property, and will pay if it be lost, damaged, or destroyed, and if live stock, will pay though it may die. I or we assume said risk in consideration of the credit extended, and purchase the property on my or our own judgment.” This differentiates the present case and that of *Cochran*v. *Jones,*supra, from that of *Whigham*v. *Hall,*8 *Ga. App.*509 (70 S. E. 23), relied on by the plaintiff in error. The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the defendant’s plea or in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

Decided February 11, 1919.

Complaint; from Gordon superior court—Judge Tarver. February *25,*1918.

*Maddox, McCamy & Shumate,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. G. B. Erwin, Jr.,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.*
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10(y)    
    


 
 

FIRST AMENDMENT
  TO THE
  HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY EXECUTIVE DEFERRED
  COMPENSATION PLAN    
    


        The Hewlett-Packard Company Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan") is amended in the following respect, effective May 1, 2004: 


1.    New
paragraph is added to the end of Section 9 to read as follows: 



        Notwithstanding
the above, if any payment due a person remains unpaid at his or her death, the payment will be made to (i) that person's spouse; (ii) if no spouse is living
at the time of such payment, then his or her living children, in equal shares; (iii) if neither a spouse nor children are living, then his or her living parents, in equal shares; (iv) if
neither spouse, nor children, nor parents are living, then his or her living brothers and sisters, in equal shares; (v) in none of the individuals described in (i) through
(iv) are living, to his or her estate. A person's domestic partner shall be considered a person's spouse for purposes of this paragraph. The Committee shall determine a person's status as a
domestic partner in a uniform and nondiscriminatory manner. Such a determination shall be binding and conclusive on all parties. 


This
First Amendment is hereby adopted this 21st day of April, 2004. 



	 	 	HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
	

 	
 	

By	
 	

/s/  MARCELA PEREZ DE ALONSO      
 Marcela Perez de Alonso

Executive Vice President

Human Resources and Workforce Development













QuickLinks



Exhibit 10(y)


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN