alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3939

AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States

Collura Post Office Building’’.Fair Lawn, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Mary AnnPostal Service located at 14–24 Abbott Road in

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3939

AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 14–24 Abbott Road in Fair Lawn, New

Jersey, as the ‘‘Mary Ann Collura Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3939 EH

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 14–24 Abbott Road in Fair Lawn, New Jersey,

4 and known as the Fair Lawn Main Post Office, shall be

5 known and designated as the ‘‘Mary Ann Collura Post Of6 fice Building’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

10 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

11 to the ‘‘Mary Ann Collura Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 11, 2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
H. Res. 577

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 6, 1998.

Resolved, That at a time designated by the Speaker of

the House of Representatives, official photographs of the

House may be taken while the House is in actual session.

Payment for the costs associated with taking, preparing, and

distributing such photographs may be made from the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit
      32.2




Certification
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2001.




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Delek Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Leonard
      Sternheim, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2001, that:







(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




November 28, 2006/s/ Leonard SternheimLeonard
                Sternheim,Chief
                Accounting
                Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,291,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,831,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   621,000
<INVENTORY>                                 26,984,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            49,576,000
<PP&E>                                      17,913,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,704,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             120,797,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       31,921,000
<BONDS>                                    103,407,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,946,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               120,797,000
<SALES>                                    138,934,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           138,934,000
<CGS>                                      111,307,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              111,307,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,254,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,923,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,450,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,453,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,997,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                489,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,508,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period from June 27, 2008 (commencement of operations) to March 31, 2009 of MacroShares $100 Oil Up Trust (the "Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), I, Samuel Masucci, III, principal executive officer of Macro Securities Depositor, LLC, which acts as the depositor for the Registrant (the "Depositor"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Annual Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.

Date: June 29, 2009

| |  |                                                                                  
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ SAMUEL MASUCCI, III                                                          
| |  | Samuel Masucci, III
Chief Executive Officer of Depositor,
on behalf of registrant
** **

**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

ANNUAL MASTER SERVICER’S CERTIFICATE

 

GE DEALER FLOORPLAN MASTER NOTE TRUST

 

March 26, 2014

 

The undersigned, aduly authorized officer of General Electric Capital Corporation (“GECC”), as the master servicer (the “MasterServicer”), pursuant to the Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement dated as of June 30, 2006 (as may be further amendedand supplemented from time to time, the “Agreement”), between GECC and GE Dealer Floorplan Master Note Trust(“Trust”), does hereby certify that:

 

1.        GECCis, as of the date hereof, Master Servicer under the Agreement.

 

2.        Theundersigned is an authorized officer who is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this certificate tothe Trust.

 

3.        Areview of the activities of Master Servicer during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the “reporting period”),and of its performance under the Agreement, has been made under my supervision.

 

4.        Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the reporting period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has duly executed this certificate the date first above written.
Case: 1:20-cv-04270 Document #: 124-1 Filed: 09/29/22 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:767

Case: 1:20-cv-04270 Document #: 124-1 Filed: 09/29/22 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:768

Case: 1:20-cv-04270 Document #: 124-1 Filed: 09/29/22 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:769

Case: 1:20-cv-04270 Document #: 124-1 Filed: 09/29/22 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:770

Case: 1:20-cv-04270 Document #: 124-1 Filed: 09/29/22 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:771

Case: 1:20-cv-04270 Document #: 124-1 Filed: 09/29/22 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:772
#### Gregory Roland PRUESS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 04-6810.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 2004.

Decided Dec. 21, 2004.

Gregory Roland Pruess, Appellant pro se. Jennifer Marie Hoefling, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Roland Pruess seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of its order denying Pruess’ motion for relief filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Pruess has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Pruess’ motion for remand, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the *885facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
EXHIBIT 10.26



 Exhibit 10.26 
  
 CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION 
 OF 
 ACAS BUSINESS LOAN LLC, 2005-1 
  
 This Certificate of Formation of ACAS Business Loan LLC, 2005-1 (the
“Company”), dated as of September 8, 2005, is being duly executed and filed by Michael T. Mullins, as an authorized person to execute this Certificate under the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act (6 Del. C. §
18-101, et seq.) (as amended from time to time, the “Act”). 
  
 FIRST. The name of the limited liability company formed hereby is “ACAS Business Loan LLC, 2005-1”. 
  
 SECOND. The address of the registered office of the Company in the State of Delaware is c/o The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209
Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801. 
  
 THIRD. The name and
address of the registered agent for service of process on the Company in the State of Delaware is The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of
Formation in accordance with the Act as of the date first above written. 
  

	
	
	/s/    MICHAEL T.
MULLINS        
	Michael T. Mullins
H. R. 3915

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the Small

Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 through April

2, 2004, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION

OF PROGRAMS UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS ACT AND

THE SMALL BUSINESS INVESTMENT ACT OF 1958.

The authorization for any program, authority, or provision,

including any pilot program, that was extended through March

15, 2004, by section 1(a) of Public Law 108–172 is further extended

through April 2, 2004, under the same terms and conditions.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN FEE AUTHORIZATIONS.

Section 503(f) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958

(15 U.S.C. 697(f)) is amended by striking ‘‘October 1, 2003’’ and

inserting ‘‘May 21, 2004’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
9839.

#### Daue *v.*Royal Mining and Milling Company.

Decided January 15, 1919.

Complaint; from Haralson superior court—Judge Bartlett. April 15, 1918.

*Griffith & Matthews, Hutchins & McBride,*for plaintiff in error.

*Price Edwards, Lloyd Thomas,*contra.,

Wade, C. J.

There was evidence to support the verd'iet, and none of the numerous special grounds of the motion for a new trial show such harmful error as to require a reversal.

*-Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins and Luke, J.J., concur.*
H. Res. 416

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 30, 1998.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 3579) making emergency supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1998, and

for other purposes. All points of order against the conference

report and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Larry B. NELSON, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Gary MAYNARD, Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections; Charles Condon, Attorney General for the State of South Carolina, Respondents—Appellees.

No. 04-7141.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 2004.

Decided Dec. 21, 2004.

Larry B. Nelson, Appellant pro se. Samuel Creighton Waters, Office of the Attorney General of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding preceding in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Larry B. Nelson seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting a magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Respondents’ motion for summary judgment on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus *879proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 338, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Nelson has not made the requisite showing.* Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*

 We find that Nelson has waived appellate review of his claims by failing to lodge specific objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation after receiving proper notice of the consequences of the failure to object. *See Wright*v. *Collins,*766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); *see also Thomas v. Arn,*474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). To the extent that Nelson attempts to raise issues in his informal brief that were not properly presented to the district court, we note that he cannot raise them for the first time on appeal. *See Muth v. United States,*1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir.1993).
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Thecertifications set forth below are hereby submitted to the Securities andExchange Commission pursuant to, and solely for the purpose of complying with,Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code in connectionwith the filing on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commissionof the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MAIR Holdings, Inc. andsubsidiaries (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”).

 

Theundersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies that,as of the end of the period covered by the Report:

 

1.               Such Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  PAUL F. FOLEY                      |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                    |
| Paul  F. Foley                          |
| President,  Chief Executive Officer and |
| acting  Chief Financial officer         |
| November  7, 2007                       |

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.6.3

Eastern Division

Evangelia Devetzi

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04598

Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber

Toyota Motor North America, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, July 29, 2022:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber: Plaintiff's motion for

dismissal by agreement, with prejudice and without costs is granted [37]. Civil case

terminated. (maf)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04598 Document #: 35 Filed: 07/29/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:238
Exhibit 13.2

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of LG.Philips LCD Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Dated: June 21, 2006



/s/ Ron H. WirahadiraksaRon H. Wirahadiraksa Joint Representative Director/ President and Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to LG.Philips LCD Co., Ltd. and will be retained by LG.Philips LCD Co., Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:November 17,  2005 |   | /s/              Serge Lacroix                                                 |
|-------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |   | Serge                LacroixChairman                of the Board and President |

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3



                STOCK OPTION CANCELLATION AND AMENDMENT AGREEMENT

        This Stock Option Cancellation and Amendment Agreement (this
"Agreement") is entered into by and between ACME Communications, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), and Tom Allen (the "Optionee") as of
this 12th day of November, 2001.

                                    RECITALS

        A. On or about September 30, 1999, the Corporation granted the Optionee
a stock option (the "Option") under the Corporation's 1999 Stock Incentive Plan
to acquire up to 685,227 shares of the Corporation's Common Stock ("Common
Stock") at a per share exercise price of $23.00. The Option is evidenced by and
subject to the terms and conditions of a written stock option agreement executed
by the Corporation and the Optionee (the "Option Agreement").

        B. The Corporation and the Optionee desire to cancel the Option to the
extent of 342,613 shares of Common Stock.

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants
made herein and the mutual benefits to be derived herefrom and for other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

        1. PARTIAL CANCELLATION OF THE OPTION. The Option shall be, and it
hereby is, terminated to the extent of 342,613 shares of Common Stock subject to
the vested and unexercised portion of the Option. Any rights that the Optionee
may have with respect to such portion of the Option (including, without
limitation, under or with respect to the Option Agreement) shall be, and they
hereby are, terminated and no amount is payable with respect thereto or with
respect to the termination of such portion of the Option.

        2. CONTINUING EFFECT OF OPTION. The remaining Option (covering 342,614
shares of Common Stock) shall remain in full effect, subject to the other terms
and conditions of the Option Agreement.

        3. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed and
enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware without giving
effect to conflicts of laws principles thereunder.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Agreement as of
the date first written above.

"OPTIONEE"                              ACME COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                                        A Delaware corporation
/s/ Tom Allen
--------------------------------
Signature                               By: /s/ Thomas Allen
                                            ------------------------------------

Tom Allen                               Its: Executive Vice President and CFO
                                             -----------------------------------
Print Name