alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

NIKE, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AWEFAM, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 20-cv-03733 

Judge Thomas M. Durkin 

Magistrate Judge Gabriel A. Fuentes

SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT 

WHEREAS, a judgment was entered in the above action on September 11, 2020 [51], in 

favor of Plaintiff Nike, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Nike”) and against the Defendants Identified in 

Schedule A in the amount of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) per Defaulting Defendant 

for willful use of counterfeit Nike Trademarks in connection with the offer for sale and/or sale of 

products through at least the Defendant Internet Stores, and Nike acknowledges payment of an 

agreed upon damages amount, costs, and interest and desires to release this judgment and hereby 

fully and completely satisfy the same as to the following Defendant: 

Defendant Name Line No. 

Greatest Gift 168 

THEREFORE, full and complete satisfaction of said judgment as to the above-referenced 

Defendant is hereby acknowledged, and the Clerk of the Court is hereby authorized and directed 

to make an entry of the full and complete satisfaction on the docket of said judgment. 

Case: 1:20-cv-03733 Document #: 59 Filed: 01/08/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:3565
2 

Dated this 8th day of January 2020. Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ RiKaleigh C. Johnson 

Amy C. Ziegler 

Justin R. Gaudio 

 RiKaleigh C. Johnson 

 Jake M. Christensen 

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. 

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

312.360.0080 / 312.360.9315 (facsimile) 

aziegler@gbc.law 

jgaudio@gbc.law 

 rjohnson@gbc.law 

 jchristensen@gbc.law 

 Counsel for Plaintiff Nike, Inc. 

Case: 1:20-cv-03733 Document #: 59 Filed: 01/08/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:3566
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Art Ask Agency

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.:

1:20−cv−04608

Honorable

Manish S. Shah

The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability

Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated

Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, November 9, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motion for extension of

time to answer [50] is granted. The defendants listed in the motion have until 11/30/20 to

respond to the complaint. This deadline does not apply to other defendants who have not

appeared. Notices mailed. (psm, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04608 Document #: 51 Filed: 11/09/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:3118
1

The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 09-2636

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Matthew M. Cunningham, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: February 18, 2010

Filed: February 25, 2010

___________

Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

After Matthew Cunningham pleaded guilty to distributing child pornography,

in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2), the district court1

 sentenced him to 120 months

in prison and 8 years of supervised release. Counsel has moved to withdraw and has

filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the

sentence is unreasonable.
-2-

The sentence, which represents a substantial downward variance from the

advisory Guidelines range of 188-235 months, is not unreasonable, see United States

v. Lazarski, 560 F.3d 731, 733 (8th Cir. 2009); and having reviewed the record under

Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues. 

Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC.
First Amendment to Change in Control & Non-Competition Agreement
  Company Executive Agreement
   FIRST
  SECOND
 in accordance with the
Companys payroll practices in effect at the time of the Employment Separation
 THIRD
  FOURTH
 1




---



##### 



FIFTH
 Code Section 409A Compliance
    2




---



##### 



e.g.
  SIXTH
  3




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Chad M. UtrupName:
    
    Chad M. UtrupTitle:
    
    CFOEXECUTIVE/s/ Kevin R.L. FraileyKevin R. L. FraileyAddress:3785 Pembrooke Green EastNew Albany, OH 43054
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04699

Honorable John Z. Lee

TikTok Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, November 13, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Defendants have filed a notice

of ta−along action. Defendants' request to reassign the case S.W., a minor, through her

Guardian JASON WILLIAMS, individually and on behalf of similarly situated

individuals, v. TikTok, Inc., and ByteDance, Inc. (Case No. 1:20−cv−6737), to this

Court's docket and designated as part of this MDL and related to this case (Master Docket

No. 20−cv−4699) is granted. Mailed notice(ca, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 104 Filed: 11/13/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1844
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel are you 

a Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this &ourt an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this &ourt’s

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 8.6.&§1746, this

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

$VVRFLDWLRQV RQ 6FKHGXOH 3$ ́

Ouyeinc Ltd. v. Individuals,

Partnerships, & Unincorporated

1:20-cv-03491

Jingdong E-commerce (Trade) Hong Kong Corporation Limited

David M. Airan

Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd.

Two Prudential Plaza, Suite 4900, 180 North Stetson Avenue

Chicago, Illinois 60601

6215687 (312) 616-5600

dairan@leydig.com

July 23, 2020

✔

✔

✔

✔

David M. Airan
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul E. Berger, M.D., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc.



|                         |  |     |  |                            
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | ---------------------------
|Dated: February 14, 2008 |  | By: |  | /S/    PAUL E. BERGER,
M.D.
|                         |  |     |  | Paul E. Berger, M.D.       
|                         |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Deborah Laufer

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04378

Honorable Charles R. Norgle Sr.

Shah Hospitality, L.L.C.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, September 24, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles R. Norgle:Civil case terminated.

Mailed notice(ewf, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04378 Document #: 7 Filed: 09/24/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:26
Rev. 09/21/2017 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of Illinois 

219 South Dearborn Street 

Chicago, Illinois 60604 

Thomas G. Bruton 312-435-5670 

Clerk 

July 2, 2020 

Re: Jacob Daneshrad et al v. Trean Group, LLC et al 

USDC Case Number: 20cv3887 

This is to advise the parties that the above titled case has been electronically 

transferred to the Northern District of Illinois from the California Central The case has 

been assigned number 20cv3887 to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso . 

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the Local Rule 83.15 of this Court requires 

that an appearance form be filed by an attorney who intends to represent a party in any 

proceeding before this Court. 

For further information, you may visit our website address at: www.ilnd.uscourts.gov for 

the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. 

Sincerely yours, 

Thomas G. Bruton, Clerk 

By: /s/ N. Finley 

 Deputy Clerk 

Case: 1:20-cv-03887 Document #: 20 Filed: 07/02/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:320
#### Louise REDDITT, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Commonwealth of VIRGINIA, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 04-6941.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 2004.

Decided Dec. 21, 2004.

Louise Redditt, Appellant pro se.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Louise Redditt seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice her petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) for failure to exhaust state remedies. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that her constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Redditt has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny her motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Redditt’s motion for appointment of counsel, motion to withdraw her Fairfax County *882court appointed attorney, motion to show cause for the warrant, and motions for trial transcripts at the government’s expense. We deny as moot the motion to resume consideration of the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 18, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41017 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE ALFREDO GLORIA-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-161

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Alfredo Gloria-Hernandez (Gloria) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gloria has not filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel, are you 

a 

 Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this Court’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 U.S.C.§1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on 

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

Elizabeth Lubeck and Alan 

Lubeck, Plaintiffs, vs. Alliant 

Capital Management, LLC, Def. 1:20-cv-04881 Elizabeth Lubeck and Alan Lubeck, Plaintiffs Rusty A. Payton Payton Legal Group 20 North Clark Steet, Suite 3300 Chicago, IL 60602 6201771 (773) 682-5210 info@payton.legal August 20, 2020 ✔

✔

✔

✔

Rusty A. Payton
9909.

#### Clanton *v.*Rowan.

Decided January 29, 1919.

Certiorari; from Berrien superior court—Judge Thomas. May *4,*1918.

*W. D.*Buie,.for plaintiff in error. *C. A. Christian,*contra.

Jenkins, J.

1. The reasonable and necessary construction of the petition is that the proceeding was one to require the removal of an obstruction from a private way acquired by seven years uninterrupted use through improved lands. *Hopkins*v. *Roach,*127 *Ga.*153 (56 S. E. 303). The ruling made in *Johnson*v. *Williams,*138 *Ga.*853 (2) (76 S. E. 380), is therefore not applicable.

2. The petition set forth a cause of action. There was evidence sustaining the allegations as made. There was no demurrer challenging the legal sufficiency of the plaintiff’s averments relative to the nature and character of the alleged obstruction. It was therefore not improper to try the case upon the issue thus made by the allegations of the petition and the denial thereof by the answer. *Southern Railway Co.*v. *Barfield,*115 *Ga.*724 (42 S. E. 95).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED 6/30/98 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,126
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,068
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,115
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,790
<PP&E>                                          61,252
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,724
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 180,159
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,597
<BONDS>                                        151,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,832
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,491
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   180,159
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,502
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,809
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   294
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,819
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,046)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (261)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (785)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (785)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kiran Patel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Solectron Corporation on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended February 28,
2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Solectron Corporation.

Date:   April 14, 2003


                                       /S/ Kiran Patel
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Kiran Patel
                                       Executive Vice President and Chief
                                       Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Solectron and will be retained by Solectron and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of DDi Capital Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce D.
McMaster, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: November 14, 2003 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ BRUCE D. MCMASTER |  |                                          
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                       | 
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Bruce D. McMaster Chief Executive Officer