alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Roddrick Kemtrell MCDONALD, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-7102.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 30, 2004.

Decided Jan. 5, 2005.

Roddrick Kemtrell McDonald, Appellant pro se.

Thomas Richard Ascik, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, Brian Lee Whisler, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Roddrick Kemtrell McDonald, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and motions for reconsideration. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability mil not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McDonald has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
#### W. J. Sanford *v.*John H. Hall.

Evidence — Failure to Exclude Objectionable Evidence — Verdict in Accordance With the Weight of Evidence.

The admission of objectionable evidence, is not of itself sufficient to disturb the verdict of a jury, where the verdict would have been in accordance with the weight of’ the testimony, if that had been excluded.

APPEAL PROM KENTON CIRCUIT COURT.

January 31, 1871.

*Clallam, for appellant.*

*Carlisle, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay :

As the jury did not find for Hall on his counter-claim, the instruction on that branch of the case did not injuriously affect appellant’s substantial rights.

We do not think that the admission of the objectionable evidence of the witness, McCloud, sufficient of itself to authorize the disturbance of the verdict of the jury. The more especially as we are of the opinion that said verdict would have been in accordance with the weight of the testimony, even if all the evidence of McCloud had been excluded.

Judgment affirmed-.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

ELIZABETH LUBECK and

ALAN LUBECK,

 Plaintiffs,

 vs.

ALLIANT CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, 

LLC, 

 Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:20-cv-04881

Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiffs, Elizabeth Lubeck and Alan Lubeck, by and through undersigned counsel, 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), hereby dismiss all claims asserted in 

this action against Defendant, Alliant Capital Management, LLC, with prejudice, each party to 

bear their/its own costs.

Dated: October 2, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

Elizabeth Lubeck and Alan Lubeck

By: /s/ Rusty Payton

Rusty A. Payton

PAYTON LEGAL GROUP

20 North Clark Street

Suite 3300

Chicago, Illinois 60602

(773) 682-5210

info@payton.legal

Arthur C. Czaja

LAW OFFICE OF ARTHUR CZAJA

7521 N. Milwaukee Ave.

Niles, Illinois 60714

(847) 647-2106

arthur@czajalawoffices.com

Counsel for Plaintiffs
EXHIBIT 32.70











Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, H. Clifford Buster III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ H. Clifford Buster III


H. Clifford Buster III


Chief Financial Officer


November 2, 2010














A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. and will be retained by Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Continuing Education Units

VERIFICATION OF ATTENDANCE FORM

Certification Number: ________________

 attended the following professional educational activity. 

(NAME)

Title: NICE Webinar: Optimizing Your LinkedIn Profile for Your Cybersecurity Career 

Date(s): January 26, 2023 CEU Hours Earned: 1 hr 

Sponsor(s): National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 

Explanation of Event: During this webinar, LinkedIn pros will share tips and tricks on how to optimize your LinkedIn profile – 

“rock your profile” -- so that employers, recruiters, and other professionals can easily find you and help you grow your 

network with the goal of advancing you in your career. Attendees will also hear about the latest labor market trends in 

cybersecurity as seen through LinkedIn’s unique data. Webinar attendees will hear presentations from: 

• Michele Stark, Federal Account Director, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, LinkedIn

• Nick DePorter, Senior Lead Manager, U.S. Public Policy and Economic Graph, LinkedIn

• Caroline Liongosari, Data Scientist, Economic Graph Research and Insights Team, LinkedIn

• Akash Kaura, Data Scientist, Economic Graph Research and Insights Team, LinkedIn

Location: Virtual Webinar; https://www.nist.gov/news-events/events/2023/01/nice-webinar-optimizing-your- 

 linkedin-profile-your-cybersecurity-career

Name of Meeting Host: Danielle Santos, Manager of Communications and Operations and Lead for 

 International Engagement, NICE 

 

Contact Information:

nist.gov/nice 

nice@nist.gov

The Continuing Education Units form is provided as a courtesy. It is the responsibility of the 

attendee to complete and submit with their certifying authority.
Tackling the Iris Cha

Evaluation using Defo

Iris Matching Techn

Dr. Marios Savvides

Research Assistant Professo

Electrical & Computer Eng and C

Carnegie Mellon University

Email: Marios.Savvides@ri.cmu.edu

www.cs.cmu.edu/~msavvid

Joint work with Dr. B.V.K. Vijayakuma
Results : Experiment 1 & 2

Right eyesEqual Error Rate : 0.27%True Acceptance Rate at False Acceptance Rate = 0.1% 

Left eyes

Equal Error Rate : 0.64%True Acceptance Rate at False Acceptance Rate = 0.1% 
Results : AnalysisBad acquisition that DID NOT cause problem

Example Image from first data set, with portion of iris not in captured frame. Was handled successfully by segmentation and pamatching.
Results : Experiment 2ROC curves (Exp. 1: blue, Exp. 2: red)

10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 

10-410-310-210-1100

False Accept Rate (FAR)

False Reject Rate (FRR)
Results : AnalysisMost errors generated by a small set of images.Example : Experiment 1, threshold set at FAR = 0.1%  One of the problem images

Difficult image – off angle
Results : AnalysisExamining errors: Come from several types of poor quality images. Can easily be detectable using a quality metric (not incversion)Off angle – noncircular boundaries Badly fo
Results : AnalysisExamining errors:

Unexplained image acquisition art
Results : AnalysisExamining errors:Low pattern information - small iris width, and partially o

shadow effects
Results : AnalysisExperiment 1, threshold set at FAR = 0.1% :These 6 low quality images account for 80% of the TAR at FAR = 0.1%:Including these 6 images: 99.63%Excluding these 6 images: 99.93%@0.1 FAR!
Outside Data : CASIA Iris Database

3 Method applied to CASIA database:

 Interesting database – not as much of a need for qua 108 iris classes, 7 infrared images per class.

Sample CASIA iris class

First session3 imagesSecond session4 images3 CASIA Iris Image Database, Chinese Academy of Sciences, http://www.sinobiometrics.com
Results : Outside DataResults on CASIA database Zero error: complete separation between authentic/im Separation margin: Fisher ratio = 32.9. 

Separation of score histograms
Conclusions

We have had the best accuracy using A probabilistic (iris-specific) matching model, based upon reliable signal processing methods  which we can derive from advanced correlation The right quality screening process might: Eliminate poorest quality images and allow both rates > 99.9%@ 0.1% FAR on the ICE data.
Future Work 

 We have some very good ideas of how to han

image segmentation.

 Can we develop an iris information quality m

can predict to be bad matches if we do have (e.g. out-of-focus blur) whether this person wto recognize? i.e. are some people’s irises mthan others and how to use this info?

 Automatically incorporate Iris image quality m

focus, occlusion) in the recognition process decision scores.
Acknowledgements

 This iris research has been spons

internal funds ..........

.....which have run out of gas for so

now.......

Sponsors & Donations welcome!
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3844 

To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit 

the comparative cost adjustment (CCA) program from operating in the 

State of New Mexico. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2004 

Mr. UDALL of New Mexico introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act 

to prohibit the comparative cost adjustment (CCA) program from operating in the State of New Mexico. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON OPERATION OF MEDICARE 

4 COMPARATIVE COST ADJUSTMENT (CCA) 

5 PROGRAM IN NEW MEXICO. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1860C–1(b) of the Social 

7 Security Act, as added by section 241 of the Medicare Pre8 scription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 
2 

•HR 3844 IH 

1 2003 (Public Law 108–173), is amended by adding at the 

2 end the following: 

3 ‘‘(3) NO CCA AREAS WITHIN NEW MEXICO.—A 

4 CCA area shall not include an MSA any portion of 

5 which is within the State of New Mexico.’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 this section shall take effect as if included in the enact8 ment of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, 

9 and Modernization Act of 2003. 

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Mish International Monetary Inc.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04577

Honorable Gary Feinerman

Vega Capital London, Ltd., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, November 30, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman: Motion to dismiss [27] is

entered and continued. The briefing schedule is set forth in the 10/5/2020 order [21]. The

status hearing set for 12/1/2020 [21] is stricken and re−set for 2/9/2021 at 9:15 a.m.

Attorneys/Parties should appear for the hearing by calling the Toll−Free Number: (877)

336−1828, Access Code: 4082461. Members of the public and media will be able to call

in to listen to this hearing (use toll free number). Please, please be sure to keep your phone

on mute when you are not speaking. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are

reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting

of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including

removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of

entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed

notice.(jlj, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
Continuing Education Units

VERIFICATION OF ATTENDANCE FORM

Certification Number:________________

 attended the following professional educational activity. 

(NAME)

Title: National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE) Webinar: The Credentialing Economy and What It 

Means for Cybersecurity Skills

Date(s): January 19, 2021 CEU Hours Earned: 1 hr 

Sponsor(s): National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 

Explanation of Event: This webinar will explore The State of Credentialing and how competencies evidenced by credentials 

are the New Currency for a Digital Economy. Webinar attendees will hear presentations from: 

• Karen Elzey, Associate Executive Director, WorkCred

• Katie Hall, Director of The Competency Project, Corporation for a Skilled Workforce

Location: Virtual Webinar; www.nist.gov/nice/webinars

Name of Meeting Host: Rodney Petersen, Director of the National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE)

 

Contact Information:

nist.gov/nice

nist.nice@nist.gov

The Continuing Education Units form is provided as a courtesy. It is the responsibility of the 

attendee to complete and submit with their certifying authority.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-85,417, TA-W-85,417A]

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (“Act”), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on August 18, 2014, applicable to workers of West Linn Paper Company, a subsidiary of Belgravia Investments, Inc., including on-site leased workers from Galt Foundation, West Linn, Oregon (TA-W-85,417). The Department's Notice of Determination was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 9, 2014 (Volume 79 FR Page 53450).                

At the request of a state workforce office, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The firm is engaged in the production of coated paper.

The investigation confirmed that worker separations at Columbia River Logistics, Inc. (CRL), including on-site leased workers from Resource Staffing, Vancouver, Washington, (TA-W-85,417) are attributable to increased imports of coated paper, as are worker separations at the West Linn, Oregon facility.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-85,417 and TA-W-85,417A is hereby issued as follows:

All workers of West Linn Paper Company, a subsidiary of Belgravia Investments, Inc., including on-site leased workers from Galt Foundation, West Linn, Oregon (TA-W-85,417) and Columbia River Logistics, Inc., including Resource Staffing, Vancouver, Washington (TA-W-85,417A) who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after July 8, 2013 through August 18, 2016, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 9th day of October, 2014.

Michael W. Jaffe,

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2014-27483 Filed 11-19-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
SHONDARIOUS CLEO BROWN

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2343

_ ____________________________/

Opinion filed September 20, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Darlene F. Dickey , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee

, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 32.1
  Section 1350
Certification
 
 In connection with theannualreport of Lotus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor theyearendedDecember31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, Liu Zhong Yi, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.    The
Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
 
 2.The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.
  April 15,
    2009
                
                /s/ Liu Zhong
      YiLiu Zhong Yi, CEO,
      Presidentand principal executive
      officer
  A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the
company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
H. Res. 567

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 2, 1998.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 4101) making appropriations for Agriculture,

Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies programs for the fiscal year ending September

30, 1999, and for other purposes. All points of order against

the conference report and against its consideration are

waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.

SEC. 2. House Resolution 551 is laid on the table.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

ABC Corporation I et al, 

 Plaintiff,

v. 

THE PARTNERSHIPS and 

UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS 

IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”, 

 Defendants.

CASE NO. 20-cv-04806

Judge: Honorable Thomas M. Durkin 

Magistrate Judge: Honorable Jeffrey Cole

 

AFFIDAVIT OF XIE RONGQING 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 281-2 Filed: 06/07/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:6918
Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 281-2 Filed: 06/07/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:6919
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the Small business Investment Company License No. 09/79-0423 issued to Bay Partners L.S. Fund, L.P., said license is hereby declared null and void.

United States Small Business Administration.

Dated: October 24, 2014.

 Javier E. Saade,

Associate Administrator for Investment.

[FR Doc. 2014-26682 Filed 11-10-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P