alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

House Calendar No. 269

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 579

[Report No. 105–790]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 4104) making appropriations for the Treasury Department,

the United States Postal Service, the Executive Office of the President,

and certain Independent Agencies, for the fiscal year ending September

30, 1999, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 1998

Mr. MCINNIS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 4104) making appropriations

for the Treasury Department, the United States Postal

Service, the Executive Office of the President, and certain Independent Agencies, for the fiscal year ending

September 30, 1999, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 4104) making appropriations for
2

HRES 579 RH

1 the Treasury Department, the United States Postal Serv2 ice, the Executive Office of the President, and certain

3 Independent Agencies, for the fiscal year ending Septem4 ber 30, 1999, and for other purposes. All points of order

5 against the conference report and against its consideration

6 are waived. The conference report shall be considered as

7 read.

House Calendar No. 269

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 579

[Report No. 105–790]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference re30, 1999, and for other purposes. Agencies, for the fiscal year ending September fice of the President, and certain Independent United States Postal Service, the Executive Of- appropriations for the Treasury Department, the port to accompany the bill (H.R. 4104) making

OCTOBER 7, 1998

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
FILED 1/19/2023

THOMAS G. BRUTON CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
FILED

SEP 06 2021
Hs, LAW 2 Tobade~ JUDGEIAIND. sornsting WM, Seb
UNITED STATES DISTRICT

US, Dist T Fue
KE! Ml, V. Ciel, 20-0 §0 BL
Candi Ta CARI of ontieneal

Un pg faa
az wrle fo Jel He Gael! an Merde

Apts Dad Me adlced” Bld hygrced es FB and PP npr
assault AS exalesred! Te this Cau abrasl’ EVERY DAY x prise is
aswanfled, attacked or bulalized by anater prison” or ste}. And yer Me
AainiTelion is ‘cing frsoners inke Cells with violet dangerous fidoers
why Dau vit yore thar Call $0 thy asl Her, Aa the SKIP
thin GREAMDES, SHAT RubBee. BETS, and SPRAY WHOLE CAUS oF GAS fl Ad
if ally the Vin€ OFFS ASSRuLTEWG fle prises CA Winkler,
C2Gastn C2 Chaduich C2Gruadald ond Uugdele.
dg

beng fell
b8L33- O53
4/25/22, 12:28 PM blob:https://www.fdms.gov/92bf20e6-ffad-4d9c-a411-ec7f064be72d

and viable resource that organizations could adopt. NIST SP 800-161 aligns closely with the taxonomy,

allowing for a complementary approach that lends itself towards becoming the pathway towards a

common set of principles. Such a pathway would allow both businesses and suppliers the opportunity to

deliver against an agreed common framework. 

There are some areas of the taxonomy that aren’t considered or addressed with the latest NIST C-SCRM

output when comparing it to the taxonomy. 

Extract:

When compared against the taxonomy, NIST SP 800-161 is broadly aligned, even down to the attribute

level. There are some gaps that may be picked up by other NIST documents. The exclusion of suppliers is

not directly considered. It does however point to adhering to legislative requirements, where this would be

covered. Removal of a supplier is only touched upon deep down in the weeds of the document, and then

only briefly. We believe that these areas are key components of C-SCRM and would benefit from being

more obviously signposted. 

To a lesser degree, there is also no consideration that service providers provide services to multiple

customers, which may include direct competitors. This can introduce separation of duties requirements to

be contracted. Additionally, the business priorities of public and private organizations are likely to be very

different and building that awareness within the document would promote a greater appreciation of that

potential dichotomy.

Attachments

NIST C-SCRM RFI

C-SCRM

Beware Suppliers

blob:https://www.fdms.gov/92bf20e6-ffad-4d9c-a411-ec7f064be72d 2/2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

JOINT STATUS REPORT

The parties, by their undersigned attorneys, provide the following joint status report 

pursuant to the court’s December 22, 2021 minute entry, Dkt. 61, as follows:

1. This employment discrimination case alleges that plaintiff Elizabeth Gonzalez, a 

former probationary employee of the EEOC, was constructively terminated due to disability 

discrimination.

2. The parties are on track to complete fact discovery by the court’s deadline of 

February 22, 2022. Plaintiff has been deposed, as well as the three main EEOC witnesses, one of 

which served as a Rule 30(b)(6) witness as well. Two of plaintiff’s union representatives are 

under subpoena, and the parties are working together to work with the union to schedule those 

depositions. The parties are also working to schedule a 30(b)(6) deposition related to the EEOC 

policies. The parties are on track to complete fact discovery by the current deadline.

3. Defendant is requesting a summary judgment briefing schedule at the end of fact 

1

 Current EEOC Chair Charlotte Burrows is automatically substituted for former Chair 

Janet Dhillon under Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d)..

ELIZABETH GONZALEZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHARLOTTE A. BURROWS, Chair of the 

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity 

Commission,1

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 20 C 2111

Judge Kennelly

Case: 1:20-cv-02111 Document #: 62 Filed: 01/27/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:475
2

discovery. The parties have agreed to the following summary judgment briefing schedule, if 

amenable to the court:

a. Defendant to file its brief on or before April 22, 2022 (AUSA Raedy has a weeklong trial and other significant, unavoidable commitments between the close of 

discovery and then)

b. Plaintiff to file her response brief on or before 30 days after Defendant files its brief.

c. Defendant to file its reply on or before two weeks after Plaintiff files her response 

brief.

Respectfully submitted,

 /s Matthew E. Lee 

BRIAN O. WATSON

MATTHEW E. LEE

RILEY SAFER HOLMES & CANCILA 

LLP

70 W. Madison Street, Suite 2900

Chicago, Illinois 60602

(312) 471-8700

bwatson@rshc-law.com

mlee@rshc-law.com

JOHN R. LAUSCH, Jr.

United States Attorney

By: /s Valerie R. Raedy 

VALERIE R. RAEDY

Assistant United States Attorney

219 South Dearborn Street

Chicago, Illinois 60604

(312) 353-8694

valerie.raedy@usdoj.gov

Case: 1:20-cv-02111 Document #: 62 Filed: 01/27/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:476
[f you need additional space for ANY section, please attach an additional sheet and reference that section.]

U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of lllinois

Appearance Form for Pro Se Litigants

lnformation entered on this form is required for any person filing a case in this court as a pro se

party (that is, without an attorney). Please PRINT legibly.

caserire: DuL t,g *(",Y; -o...1;;5,

Judge Jorge L Alonso

An appearance is hereby fited by the undersigned as , , 

ltlaoisilrate Judge Young B' Kim

Name:

Street Address:

City/State/Zip:

Phone Number:

tfo! (q+4enecn A tr-(-

Nor .|-

REQUEST TO RECEIVE NOTICE THROUGH E-MAIL

lf you check the box below and provide an e-mail address in the space provided, you will receive notice

via e-mail. By checking the box and providing an e-mail address, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

5(b)2(E) you are waiving your right to receive a paper copy of documents filed electronically in this case.

You should not provide an e-mail address if you do not check it frequenfly.

I request to be sent notices from the court via e-mail. I understand that by making this request, I

am waiving the right to receive a paper copy of any electronically filed document in this case. I

understand that if my e-mail address changes I must promptly notifu the Court in writing.

l<en dqV stq uoru @ t t^at L cah

Rev.0612312016

FILED

JUL og 2o2o 

fl

THOMAS G. BRUTON

{o$ q\

Signature =\---

q Ju\-.u loTo ffi

[lf you need additionatspace forANY section, ptease attach an additionatsheet and ,"r"r"n.9hF$[ii#iS' OSfnlCT COURT

Case: 1:20-cv-04019 Document #: 3 Filed: 07/09/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:194
----

Exhibit 32.2

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. §1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bridge Technology,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the periodended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JohnT. Gauthier, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

| 1.     |   | The Report fully complies with the        requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities        Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                               |
| 2.     |   | The information contained in the Report        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial        condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

|   |   |                   |   |   |   |   |   |                      |
|--------|--------|------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|   |   |                   |   |   |   |   |   |                      |
|   |   | Date: January 16, 2004 |   |   |   |   |   | /s/ John T. Gauthier      |
|   |   |                   |   |   |   |   |   |                           |
|   |   |                   |   |   |   |   |   | John T. Gauthier          |
|   |   |                   |   |   |   |   |   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906, an other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
H. Res. 607

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 20, 1998.

Resolved, That a revised edition of the Rules and Manual

of the House of Representatives for the One Hundred Sixth

Congress be printed as a House document, and that three

thousand additional copies shall be printed and bound for the

use of the House of Representatives, of which nine hundred

copies shall be bound in leather with thumb index and delivered as may be directed by the Parliamentarian of the House.

Attest:

Clerk.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 530

Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 11, 1998

Mr. FAZIO of California submitted the following resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating minority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Member be, and

2 is hereby, elected to the following standing committee of

3 the House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: Mr. Barrett of Wis5 consin.

Æ
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 28

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that programs based

upon the premise that ‘‘Ebonics’’ is a legitimate language should not

receive Federal funds.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Mr. KING of New York submitted the following resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

programs based upon the premise that ‘‘Ebonics’’ is a

legitimate language should not receive Federal funds.

Whereas ‘‘Ebonics’’ is not a legitimate language: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that no Federal funds should be used to pay

3 for or support any program that is based upon the premise

4 that ‘‘Ebonics’’ is a legitimate language.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,030,417
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             3,100,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  3,105,535
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     40,483,176
<ALLOWANCE>                                    530,034
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,883,873
<DEPOSITS>                                  45,226,426
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            446,246
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       512,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,699,201
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              50,883,873
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,979,633
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               86,129
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                84,315
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,150,077
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             932,701
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             932,701
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,217,376
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  112,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                693,788
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                564,979
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     452,479
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   452,479
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.88
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     3.0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                    15,432
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               481,035
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   68,914
<RECOVERIES>                                     5,913
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              530,034
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           530,034
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Handbook 44 – 2020 Appendix E. Change Log

E-1

Appendix E. Change Log

Date Type of Edit Change (reflected in bold and underscore) Location

7/24/2023 This information was 

reflected in NIST HB 44 

(2019) and inadvertently 

removed from NIST 

Handbook 44 editions 

2020, 2022, and 2023.

S.1.6.7. Recorded Representations. –

Except for fleet sales and other price 

contract sales and for transactions where a 

post-delivery discount is provided, a printed 

receipt providing the following information 

shall be available through a built-in or

separate recording element for all 

transactions conducted with point-of-sale 

systems or devices activated by debit cards, 

credit cards, and/or cash:

(a) the total volume of the delivery;*

(b) the unit price;*

(c) the total computed price;* 

(d) the product identity by name, symbol, 

abbreviation, or code number;* and

(e) the dispenser designation by either an 

alphabetical or numerical 

description.**

[Nonretroactive as of 

January 1, 1986]**[Nonretroactive as of 

January 1, 2021]

(Added 1985) (Amended 1997, 2012, and 

2014)

S.1.6.8. Recorded Representations for 

Transactions Where a Post-Delivery 

Discount(s) is Provided. – Except for fleet 

sales and other price contract sales, a printed 

receipt providing the following information 

shall be available through a built-in or 

separate recording element that is part of the 

system for transactions involving a postdelivery discount:

(a) the product identity by name, symbol, 

abbreviation, or code number;

(b) transaction information as shown on 

the dispenser at the end of the 

delivery and prior to any postdelivery discount(s), including the: 

(1) total volume of the delivery; 

(2) unit price; and 

Section 3.30 Liquid 

Measuring Devices, 

Paragraph S.1.6.7.(e) 

and S.1.6.8.(e)
Appendix E. Change Log Handbook 44 – 2020

E-2

(3) total computed price of the fuel 

sale.

(c) an itemization of the post-delivery 

discounts to the unit price; and

(d) the final total price of the fuel sale 

after all post-delivery discounts are 

applied.

(e) the dispenser designation by either an 

alphabetical or numerical 

description.

[Nonretroactive as of January 1, 2021]

(Added 2012) (Amended 2014)
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 15.1

November 4, 2004

Vornado Operating Company
210 Route 4 East
Paramus, New Jersey

We have made a review, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial
information of Vornado Operating Company for the periods ended September 30,
2004 and 2003, as indicated in our report dated November 4, 2004; because we did
not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 is
incorporated by reference in:

             Registration Statement No. 333-40701 on Form S-11
             Registration Statement No. 333-77143 on Form S-8
             Registration Statement No. 333-68458 on Form S-8

We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
Presidential Documents

68091 

Federal Register 

Vol. 79, No. 219 

Thursday, November 13, 2014 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of November 12, 2014 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Iran 

On November 14, 1979, by Executive Order 12170, the President declared 

a national emergency with respect to Iran and, pursuant to the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706), took related steps 

to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, 

foreign policy, and economy of the United States constituted by the situation 

in Iran. Because our relations with Iran have not yet returned to normal, 

and the process of implementing the agreements with Iran, dated January 

19, 1981, is still under way, the national emergency declared on November 

14, 1979, must continue in effect beyond November 14, 2014. Therefore, 

in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 

U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with 

respect to Iran declared in Executive Order 12170. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

November 12, 2014. 

[FR Doc. 2014–27105 

Filed 11–12–14; 12:00 pm] 

Billing code 3295–F5 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with O0OB#1.EPS</GPH>
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

Bureau of Consumer Financial ) 

Protection, ) Case No. 1:20-cv-04176 

 ) 

Plaintiff, ) 

) 

v. ) Judge Franklin U. Valderrama

) Magistrate Judge Gabriel A. Fuentes

) 

Townstone Financial, Inc., et al., ) 

) 

 Defendants. ) 

MOTION TO WITHDRAW 

I, Barry E. Reiferson, respectfully move for leave of this Court to withdraw as counsel in 

this case for the plaintiff, Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. 

1. On July 22, 2020, I filed an Attorney Appearance Form in this case on behalf of 

the plaintiff. Doc. 11. 

2. I will be ending my employment with the Bureau of Consumer Financial 

Protection on September 12, 2022. 

3. Other attorneys with the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection have appeared

for, and will continue to represent, the agency in this case. Granting leave will neither prejudice 

the plaintiff nor cause undue delay.

Case: 1:20-cv-04176 Document #: 75 Filed: 09/09/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:359
2 

I respectfully request that this Court grant this motion for leave to withdraw as counsel. 

Dated: September 9, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Barry E. Reiferson 

Barry E. Reiferson

Email: barry.reiferson@cfpb.gov 

1700 G Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20552 

Telephone: (212) 328-7020 

Facsimile: (202) 435-5477 

Attorney for the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection

Case: 1:20-cv-04176 Document #: 75 Filed: 09/09/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:360
jet and rocket million-pound
engines deadweight
machine

&

calibrate me

_
an |

L

Ly
FZ
4

_w

IT you Can

~

=e

The true story of
areal heavyweight.
#### CREECH v. MELNIK

No. 539A96

Case below: 124 N.C.App. 502

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals denied 8 May 1997.
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 14

- 00831

- CR
RICKY RAMOS , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee Appeal from the 263rd District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. No. 1411387 ).
This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on September 30, 2014. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.
Judgment rendered October 27, 2015

. Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Lloyd. Opinion delivered by Justice Massengale.