alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3989

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to direct the United States Executive 

Director at the Inter-American Development Bank to urge the Bank 

to release the loans approved for Haiti, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2004

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida (for himself, Mr. MEEK of Florida, Mr. WEXLER, 

Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. OBERSTAR, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of 

Texas, Mr. RUSH, Mr. OWENS, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mr. KLECZKA, and Ms. 

NORTON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to direct the United 

States Executive Director at the Inter-American Development Bank to urge the Bank to release the loans approved for Haiti, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Helping the People 

5 of Haiti Act’’. 
2

•HR 3989 IH 

1 SEC. 2. URGING THE RELEASE OF INTER-AMERICAN DEVEL2 OPMENT BANK LOANS TO HAITI . 

3 Within 30 days after the date of the enactment of 

4 this section, the Secretary of the Treasury shall direct the 

5 United States Executive Director at the Inter-American 

6 Development Bank to use the voice and vote of the United 

7 States to urge the Bank to release the four social sector 

8 and development loans totaling $146,000,000, for health, 

9 education, water and sanitation, and transportation, that 

10 have been approved by the Board of Executive Directors 

11 of the Bank and ratified by the Parliament of Haiti. 

12 SEC. 3. INTERNATIONAL APPEALS. 

13 (a) The Secretary of the Treasury shall—

14 (1) appeal to each international financial insti15 tution (as defined in section 1701(c)(2) of the Inter16 national Financial Institutions Act) to strengthen 

17 the efforts of the institution to assist the people of 

18 Haiti in the development of their economy; and 

19 (2) urge each such institution to take imme20 diate steps to provide to Haiti the full range of loans 

21 and other financial assistance offered by the institu22 tion. 

23 (b) The Secretary of State shall—

24 (1) appeal to foreign governments to strengthen 

25 the efforts of those governments to assist the people 

26 of Haiti in the development of their economy; and 
3

•HR 3989 IH 

1 (2) urge each foreign government to take imme2 diate steps to provide to Haiti the full range of loans 

3 and other financial assistance offered by the govern4 ment.

Æ
Order entered October 1 5 , 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 01100

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J .Q., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 304th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. JD

- 12

- 00702

- W



### O RDER

As the reporter’s record was filed October 14, 2013, we VACATE our October 9, 2013

order submitting the appeal without the reporter’s record. Appellant shall file her brief within

t wen ty (20) days of the date of this order.

/Michael J. O ’ Neill /

MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

PRESIDING JUSTICE
Dismissed and Opinion Filed January 14, 2014 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00002-CV 

IN RE BILLY SIMS, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 5 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F-8795144 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Bridges, Lang-Miers, and Myers 

Opinion by Justice Bridges 

Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus complaining that the trial 

court has failed to timely rule on his motion for appointment of counsel to assist him in postconviction habeas corpus matters. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need 

not recount them herein. This Court does not have jurisdiction over relator’s petition. See TEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2010); In re Hampton, No. 05-07-00440-CV, 

2007 WL 1168446 at *1 (Tex. App.–Dallas Apr. 20, 2007, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). 

Accordingly, we DISMISS relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction. 

140002F.P05 

/David Bridges/ 

DAVID BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-428

Lower Tribunal No. CF21-005554-XX

_____________________________

JODY HILLIS,

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County.

Melissa Gravitt, Judge.

February 13, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TRAVER, C.J., and WHITE and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Joanna Beth Conner, Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Exhibit 4.35
 Third Amended and Restated Business Operation Agreement
   Address:  Legal Representative:
 Address: nd  Legal Representative:
 Address:  ID No.:
 Address:  ID No.:
 Address: th  ID No.:
 WHEREAS:
      th
 st




---



##### 



th
 NOW THEREFORE,
       Appointment of the Companys Employees




---



##### 



Guarantees for Working Capital
  Termination
   Compensation for Damage
  ettlement of Distribution




---



##### 



Effectiveness of the Agreement
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 Party
A:
 Signature of Authorized Representative:
    
    /s/ Justin Tang
 Official Seal:
 Party
B:
 Signature of Authorized Representative:
    
    /s/ Justin Tang
 Official Seal:
 Party
C:
 Signature:
    
    /s/ Justin Tang
 Party
D:
 Signature:
    
    /s/ Guangfu Cui
 Party
E:
 Signature:
    
    /s/ Jack Wang
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

# **I, Brian W. Bethers, certifythat:**

# ** **

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of 1-800 CONTACTS, INC.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)              Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, andreport financial information; and

 

b)             Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Dated:  May 13, 2004 | /s/ Brian W. Bethers                   |   |
|----------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                 | President and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.02

                     RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATIONS

I, Patrick Hayward, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of ML Futures Investments L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
   disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
   ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
   consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
   entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
   prepared; and

   b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
   procedures and such presented in this report our conclusions about the
   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
   period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

   c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
   over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
   fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
   materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
   reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
   operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely
   affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
   financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
   over financial reporting.

Date: May 16, 2005
------------------

By /s/ PATRICK HAYWARD
   -------------------
Patrick Hayward
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

MISH INTERNATIONAL MONETARY INC.,

on behalf of itself and 

all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

VEGA CAPITAL LONDON, LTD., and 

JOHN DOES 1-100, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 1:20-cv-04577 

DEFENDANT VEGA CAPITAL LONDON, LTD.’S 

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT 

TO RULE 7.1 AND LOCAL RULE 3.2 

Defendant, Vega Capital London, Ltd., by its undersigned counsel and in 

accord with Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby states that 

there is no parent corporation or publicly held corporation that owns more 

than 10% of its stock. Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2, Vega states that it has no 

publicly held affiliates. 

Dated: September 18, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 

VEGA CAPITAL LONDON, LTD. 

 

By: /s/ Amy Graham Doehring 

 One of its attorneys 

Amy Graham Doehring 

AKERMAN LLP 

71 S. Wacker Drive, 47th Floor 

Chicago, IL 60606 

(312) 634-5700 

amy.doehring@akerman.com 
2 

Michael P. Kelly (pro hac vice pending) 

AKERMAN LLP 

750 Ninth Street, N.W., Suite 750 

Washington, DC 20001 

(202) 393-6222 

michael.kelly@akerman.com 

Joel S. Forman (pro hac vice pending) 

Meghan K. Boland (pro hac vice pending) 

AKERMAN LLP 

520 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor 

New York, NY 10022 

(212) 880-3800 

joel.forman@akerman.com

meghan.boland@akerman.com 
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I, Amy Graham Doehring, an attorney, hereby certify that on 

September 17, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the 

Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notice of electronic filing 

via electronic mail to all attorneys of record. 

/s/ Amy Graham Doehring 

Amy Graham Doehring
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1550
DIRECTV INCORPORATED, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus STAN A. HARRISON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (CA-03-454) Submitted: February 5, 2007 Decided: February 15, 2007 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stan A. Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. Clement Dean Carter, III, Donald Jay Richardson, WILLIAMS MULLEN, Richmond, Virginia; Stephen Gerard Test, Robert Henry Burger, WILLIAMS MULLEN, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Stan A. Harrison appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of DirecTV, Inc., on its action seeking damages for satellite signal piracy. Because the underlying debt has been discharged in Harrison’s Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding, we dismiss this appeal as moot. In light of this disposition, we also deny DirecTV’s motion to vacate the district court judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal c ontentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.1

Eastern Division

ABC Corporation I, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.:

1:20−cv−04806

Honorable Thomas M.

Durkin

The Partnership and Unincorporated Associations

Identified on Schedule "A", et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, July 20, 2023:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Local Rule 7.1 limits

briefs to 15 pages absent "prior approval of the court." The Court granted Defendants'

motion for leave to file "an over−length brief" in support of summary judgment [631]

[632]. The Court failed to limit the number of additional pages, and Defendants filed a

brief of 71 pages [629]. Defendants then filed a reply brief of 46 pages [643], whereas

Plaintiffs were able to respond to Defendants' motion in only 23 pages [635]. Defendants'

briefs are of unreasonable length and greatly exceed the length necessary to defend against

Plaintiffs' claims. For this reason, Defendants' motion [628] is denied without prejudice so

that they may file more concise briefs. Defendants may refile their motion, supported by a

brief of no more than 30 pages, due by 9/8/2023; Plaintiffs may file a revised response of

30 pages, due by 9/29/2023; and Defendants may file a reply of 15 pages, due by

10/13/2023. The parties statements of material fact and statements of additional material

fact and responses should be refiled in conjunction with their revised briefs, but the

statements should not be lengthened or revised in any manner. Mailed notice. (ecw, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 663 Filed: 07/20/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:16698
**EXHIBIT 23**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED 

PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

The Board of Directors 

Gold Kist Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-119692) on Form S-8 ofGold Kist Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) of our report dated December 14, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of October 1, 2005 and September 30, 2006, and the related consolidatedstatements of operations, patrons’ and other equity/stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the year ended June 26, 2004, the transition quarter ended October 2, 2004 and the years endedOctober 1, 2005 and September 30, 2006 and the related financial statement schedule, Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2006 and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2006, which reports appear in the September 30, 2006, annual report on Form 10-K of the Company. 

Our report refers to changes in the method of accounting for share-based payment in 2005 and for amortization of unrecognized net actuarial losses related to the post-retirement medical plan in 2006. In our report onthe consolidated financial statements specified above, we state that we did not audit the financial statements of GK Insurance Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary, which statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us.Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, insofar as it relates to GK Insurance Company, is based solely on the report of the other auditors. 

KPMG LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

December 14, 2006
```

                        MCGOVERN, HURLEY, CUNNINGHAM, LLP
                              CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

                                     CONSENT

TO:      NORTHWESTERN MINERAL VENTURES INC. ("NORTHWESTERN")

AND TO:  BERNS & BERNS, COUNSELORS AT LAW

AND TO:  U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FROM:    MCGOVERN, HURLEY, CUNNINGHAM, LLP

RE:      NORTHWESTERN MINERAL VENTURES INC. - AUDITED
         ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIODS ENDED
         DECEMBER 31, 2004 AND 2003

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We hereby consent to the inclusion of our report dated February 3, 2005 in
connection with our audits of the financial statements of Northwestern for the
periods ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, in Northwestern's Annual Report on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 ("Form 20-F"), for the purposes
of filing same with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Dated this 15th day of July, 2005.

                                        MCGOVERN, HURLEY, CUNNINGHAM, LLP

                                        /s/ McGovern, Hurley, Cunningham, LLP

                                        Chartered Accountants

     2005 Sheppard Avenue East, Suite 300, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2J 5B4
                  Telephone (416) 496-1234 Fax: (416) 496-0124
```
9723.

#### Blalock *v.*Farkas.

Decided December 3, 1918.

Complaint; from city court of.Albany—Judge Clayton Jones. April 11, 1918,

*R. J. Bacon, R. H. Ferrell,*for plaintiff in error.

*Milner & Farkas,*contra.

Bloodworth, *J.*

Grounds 4, 5, and 6 of tlie motion for a new trial are but amplifications of the general grounds; and ground 7 .is without merit. There is ample evidence to sustain the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., concurs. Stephens, J., not presiding.*
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of NexGen Biofuels Ltd.(the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Ram
Ajjarapu, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my
knowledge pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, following due inquiry, I believe that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                               NEXGEN BIOFUELS LTD

August 14, 2008                                By: /s/ J. Ram Ajjarapu
                                               -----------------------
                                               J RAM AJJARAPU
                                               INTERIM CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3933 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3933

            To repeal section 754 of the Tariff Act of 1930.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2004

Mr. Ramstad (for himself and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To repeal section 754 of the Tariff Act of 1930.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CONTINUED DUMPING AND SUBSIDY OFFSET.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 754 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 
1675c), and the item relating to section 754 in the table of contents 
for title VII of that Act, are repealed.
    (b) Existing Accounts.--All amounts remaining, upon the enactment 
of this Act, in any special account established under section 754(e)(1) 
of the Tariff Act of 1930 (as in effect on the day before the date of 
the enactment of this Act) shall be deposited in the general fund of 
the Treasury.
                                 <all>
```