# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 24, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00408

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.C.L. AND K.R.L. AND M.C.L., CHILDREN,

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016PA01348 Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

This is an appeal from a trial court’s order terminating appellant’s rights to his children. Appellant filed his original brief in this matter on August 28, 2017. Upon review, this court noted appellant had failed to file a proper appendix with his brief . Specifically, the appendix did not contain a copy of the trial court’s termination order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.1(k). We notified appellant of this deficiency by letter dated August 30, 2017, advising appellant that although the court was not order r ebriefing, a proper appendix had to be filed within ten days of the date of the letter. In response to our notice, appellant filed an amended brief that included a copy of the trial court’s termination order in the appendix. However, upon further review, we find that appellant’s brief and the appendix are in violation of Rule 9.8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. R. 9.8(b).

Rule 9.8(b) states that in an appeal or original proceeding in an appellate court arising out

of a case in w hich the termination of parental rights was at issue , all papers submitted to the appellate court ( except the docketing statement), including all appendix items submitted with a brief, must identify a minor by an alias unless the court orders otherwise. I d. Moreover, we may require that a minor’s parent or other family member be identified only by an alias if necessary to protect a minor’s identity. Id. If a brief or other document fails to comply with this rule, it

must be redacted to bring the brief a nd accompanying documents into compliance. Id.

Here, the termination order in appellant’s appendix , which is attached to the brief

, has not

been redacted at all. It includes the names and birthdates of all the minor children that are the subject of t his appeal, as well as the name of a minor child who is not the subject of this appeal. It also contains the names of all parents and other adults associated with the children identified inthe order of termination. Moreover, the brief identifies the app ellant by name and we find that

such identification could lead to the identification of the minor children. Accordingly, we

ORDER appellant’s amended brief and appendix, which was filed on September 1, 2017, struck.

We further ORDER appellant to file an amended brief and appendix, redacting the names and

birthdates of all minor children as well as all of the adults contained therein. See id. Appellant’s amended brief should identify all children and adults by aliases. We ORDER appellant to file the redacted brief and appendix in this court on or before November 3, 2017

.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel.

It is so ORDERED on this 24th day of October, 2017

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

___________________________________

KEITH E. H OTTLE

, Clerk of Court