alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 367 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     February 25, 1998.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 1544) to prevent Federal agencies from pursuing policies of 
unjustifiable nonacquiescence in, and relitigation of, precedents established in 
the Federal judicial circuits. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed 
with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on the Judiciary. After general debate the bill shall be 
considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to 
consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute 
rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 
the Judiciary now printed in the bill. Each section of the committee amendment 
in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. During consideration 
of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord 
priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment 
has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record 
designated for that purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII. Amendments so printed 
shall be considered as read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) 
postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole 
a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes 
the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows 
another electronic vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum 
time for electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 
fifteen minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment 
the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments 
as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on 
any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the 
committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall 
be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
No. 15,052.

#### Hewett *v.*Fenstamaker.

*Taxes.*— Injunction.—Payment *of Part Due.*— Tender.—Pleading.—An injunction will not lie to prevent the collection of taxes, a portion of which are legally assessed, without an allegation in the complaint that the plaintiff has paid so much of the assessment as is lawfully due; or that he has tendered the same to the tax collector, and that he keeps the tender good by bringing the money into court foi> his benefit.

From the Henry Circuit Court.

*J. M. Morris,*for appellant.

*J. H. Mellett,*for appellee.

Miller, J.

This was an action to enjoin the collection of taxes.

It was alleged in the complaint that a portion of the taxes assessed against the plaintiff for the year 1888 were illegal; that at the proper time the plaintiff tendered to the defendant a sum of money being, as he claimed, the full amount lawfully assessed against him, and demanded from the defendant a receipt in full for all taxes assessed against him then *due;*that the defendant refused to give him a receipt in full for his taxes, but demanded, and threatened to collect, the full amount of taxes assessed against him.

It nowhere appears in the complaint that the plaintiff paid the taxes which he admits were properly and lawfully assessed against him, and there is no pretense that the tender was kept good by bringing the money into court. The plaintiff does not even aver a willingness or readiness to pay his lawful taxes.

An injunction will not lie to prevent the collection of taxes, a portion of which are legally assessed, without an allegation in the complaint that the complainant has paid so much of the assessment as was lawfully due; or that he has tendered the same to the tax collector, and that he keeps the tender good by bringing the money into court for his benefit. *316
      *Brown*v. *Herron,*59 Ind. 61; *Morrison*v. *Jacoby,*114 Ind. 84. In the latter case the reasonableness of the rule requiring the complaint to show that the tender is kept good by bringing the money into court, is so fully set forth that a citation of other authority is unnecessary.

Filed May 21, 1891.

It follows that the court did not err in sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, and rendering judgment for costs against the plaintiff, who is the appellant here.

Judgment affirmed.
H. Res. 409

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 29, 1998.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R.

3717) to prohibit the expenditure of Federal funds for the

distribution of needles or syringes for the hypodermic injection of illegal drugs. The bill shall be considered as read for

amendment. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening motion

except: (1) two hours of debate on the bill equally divided and

controlled by Representative Wicker of Mississippi or his designee and a Member opposed to the bill; and (2) one motion

to recommit.

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2000 and condensed
consolidated statement of operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           170,641
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       4,056
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 186,282
<CASH>                                          25,668
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              12,940
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          75,406
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 671,475
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                144,725
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            229,996
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,853
<OTHER-SE>                                     211,545
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   671,475
<PREMIUMS>                                     104,648
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              2,927
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              (1,415)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     549
<BENEFITS>                                      45,301
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     14,698
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,225)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (10,225)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.88)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0



</TABLE>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
 ACTION: Update Listing of Financial Institutions in Liquidation.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                        ) may be relied upon as “of record” notice that the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the identification of any institutions which have been placed in liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at 
                        *www.fdic.gov/​bank/​individual/​failed/​banklist.html*
                         or contact the Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center. Dated: November 10, 2014. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Pamela Johnson, Regulatory Editing Specialist.
 
 
 Institutions in Liquidation
[In alphabetical order]
FDIC Ref. No.
Bank name
City
State
Date closed10508
Frontier Bank, FSB D/B/A El Paseo Bank
Palm Desert
CA
11/7/2014


[FR Doc. 2014-27046 Filed 11-14-14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
FBI

CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFORMATION 

DIVISION

Februa
Fingerprint Reposito

• IAFIS DATABASES

– Criminal Master File (CMF) 51 Million – Civil 11.05 Mil– Unsolved Latent File (ULF) 94,000 Su

– Total Capacity 250,000 Subjects

– Special Latent Cognizant File (SLC) is 

concentrated subset of the CMF and cseparate files with a total capacity of 1Subjects (i.e. Terrorists, Disaster VictiCrimes etc...)
Identification Rat

Fiscal Year 200

• Criminal

– Processed 10,323,126 Su– Rejected 401,211– Idents 6,974,075– Non-Idents 2,907,453Fiscal Year 2005 Criminal Ident Ra
Identification Rat

Fiscal Year 200

• Civil

– Processed 9,777,762 Sub– Rejected 492,688– Idents 1,091,904– Non-Idents 8,171,340Fiscal Year 2005 Criminal Ident Ra
Ten Print Servic

Statistics

• IAFIS design workload:

62,500 searches per day

• Average Searches January 2006

Criminal: 26,953 per dayCivil: 28,342 per dayTotals: 55,295 Searches per day

Peak Closeout Days:Sept. 7, 2005 95,989 Ten-print cards weJuly 29, 2005 5.55 million NCIC requests 
IAFIS REPOSITOR

• IAFIS Ten-Print Criminal Master Fil

are required to return responses wi

• The current average response time 

minutes for Criminal Searches

• IAFIS Ten-Print Civil File Searches 

to return responses within 24 hours

• The current average response time 

and 30 minutes for Civil Searches
Latent Searche

• Since 7/28/99 IAFIS sta

– FBI Laboratory Division Latent P

made over 1301 identifications aindividuals in 807 investigations

• Domestic/International Terro

of Mass Destruction, HomicidRape, Bank Robbery, FinanciFraud, Extortion, Organized CUnknown 

– Latent Print Unit is submitting a

10% of FBI IAFIS Latent Searche
Latent Searche

• Latent Searches of Criminal Mas

(30% penetration)

State 317FBI 218Federal Agencies 100

Total 635

At present these allocations are enforce because the daily latent average is about 400+ per day
Latent Searche

• Statistical analysis indicates IA

handle 1000-1400 searches pe

– Originally designed to handle 63– Since IAFIS is receiving approxim

latents per day none of the limits 

– These totals do not include inter

projects

• Search response time

– Design Requirement is to respon

hours

• Seldom exceeds five hours• Usually within two hours• Current average response time 1 hours • January 30, 2005 IAFIS processed 659 la

in a 24 hour period 
Remote Latent Us

• Over 100 originating agencies with l

connectivity to FBI-IAFIS

• Majority of remote latent searches c

various Federal, State, and Local Us

• FBI Laboratory Division submits app

1000 Latent Searches a month

• Remote Latent Users (Other Federa

Local Law Enforcement Latent Userapproximately 8500 Latent Searches 
Remote Latent Us

• Largest Agencies include:

– Texas 2100 a month

– New York 1600 a month 

– Virginia 775 a month– California 650 a month– Florida 550 a month– USSS 400 a month– Pennsylvania 400 a month
Question/Comme

Jeff CarlyleLatent LiaisonInformation Technology SpecialisFBI/CJIS304-625-2474jcarlyle@leo.gov
H. Res. 384

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 12, 1998.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2883) to amend provisions of law enacted by

the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 to improve Federal agency strategic plans and performance reports. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with.

Points of order against consideration of the bill for failure to

comply with clause 2(l)(6) of rule XI are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one

hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on Government

Reform and Oversight. After general debate the bill shall be

considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall

be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of

amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the

nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on
2

•HRES 384

Government Reform and Oversight now printed in the bill.

The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall

be considered as read. During consideration of the bill for

amendment, the chairman of the Committee of the Whole

may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the

Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed

in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for

that purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request

for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five

minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without

intervening business, provided that the minimum time for

electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall

be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill

for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill

to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House

on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole

to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of

a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage
3

•HRES 384

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Padmaja Chowdhary

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03321

Honorable Steven C. Seeger

Debt Recovery Solutions, LLC

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, June 17, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court reviewed the

Notice of Settlement (Dckt. No. [7]), which reported that the parties "have settled all

claims between them in this matter" and are in the process of finalizing the paperwork. In

light of the representation that the parties have settled in principle, this case is hereby

dismissed without prejudice. The dismissal will automatically convert to a dismissal with

prejudice unless the parties seek and obtain relief of Court by August 21, 2020. The

parties reported that they may want this Court to "retain jurisdiction for any matters

related to completing and/or enforcing the settlement." The Court directs counsel to read

the entry about "Settlement Dismissal Orders" on Judge Seeger's webpage. Civil case

terminated. Mailed notice. (jjr, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03321 Document #: 8 Filed: 06/17/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Dominique Stinson, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04603

Honorable John J. Tharp Jr.

LCS Community Employment LLC, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, May 3, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:For the reasons described

in the accompanying order and statement, the defendant's Motion to Stay [32] is granted

and its Motion to Dismiss [29] is denied without prejudice. Enter Order. Mailed notice(air,

)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04603 Document #: 36 Filed: 04/30/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:875
9651.

9653.

#### Pasco Flour Mills Co. *v.*City Supply Co.

#### Allen *v.*City Supply Co.

Broyles, P. J.

1. There is no merit in the motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions.

2. Upon the demurrer, attacking, the plaintiff’s petition on both general and special grounds, the court entered a judgment, dated February 13, 1918, “that the demurrer to paragraph 3 of the declaration be sustained unless amended within 10 days from this date so as to meet the objections raised by the demurrer.” The plaintiff; within ten days ' thereafter, filed in the office of the clerk of the court a paper purporting to be an amendment to the petition, and served a copy thereof upon opposing counsel. This amendment, however, was filed without an order of- the court, and was never allowed by the court. On March 15, 1918, the defendant filed a motion to strike the purported amendment from the files, on the ground that it was filed without an order, of the court and had never been allowed by the court, and therefore did not constitute an amendment to the petition. This motion contained also a prayer that the case be dismissed and stricken from the docket. The motion was heard on March 15, 1918, and the court thereupon passed the following order: “The plaintiff having filed his amended motion [proposed amendment] in the clerk’s office within the time allowed for amending his petition,.and having served defendant’s counsel with a copy of the same at the time of filing the original, the within motion to. dismiss is hereby overruled.” *Held:*The motion to strike the proposed amendment and to dismiss the case should have been sustained. A proposed amendment can not properly be so filed as to become a part of the record until it has been allowed by the court. It *96was not a sufficient compliance with the order of the court, requiring the plaintiff to amend the petition within ten days, to file a proposed amendment without an allowance thereof. *Johnson*v. Vassar, 143 *Ga.*702 (85 S. E. 833), and authorities there cited; *Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Co.*v. *Robinson,*14 *Ga. App.*73 (80 S. E. 299). Paragraph 3 of the petition was vital to the plaintiff’s ease. With that paragraph stricken, and nothing substituted by way of amendment, the petition set forth no cause of action and should have been dismissed.

Decided November 23, 1918.

Action for breach of contract; from city court of Carrollton—■ Judge Beall. February -13, 1918.

The motion to dismiss the writ of error was on the ground that “none of the rulings complained of amount to a final disposition of the cause, and if they had been sustained by the court they would not have amounted to a final disposition of the cause.”

*C. E. Roop,*for plaintiffs in error.

*B. F. Boykin,*contra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Bloodworth, J., concurs. Stephens, J., not presiding.*