alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 8952]

A meeting of the Department of State's Advisory Committee on International Law will take place on Monday, December 15, from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at the George Washington University Law School, Michael K. Young Faculty Conference Center, 716 20th Street NW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC. Acting Legal Adviser Mary McLeod will chair the meeting, which will be open to the public up to the capacity of the conference room. The meeting will include discussions on a variety of international law topics.

                    Members of the public who wish to attend should contact the Office of the Legal Adviser by December 11 at                     *lermanjb@state.gov*                     or 202-776-8442 and provide their name, professional affiliation, address, and phone number. A valid photo ID is required for admission to the meeting. Attendees who require reasonable accommodation should make their requests by December 8. Late requests will be considered but might not be possible to accommodate.                  

Dated:  November 12, 2014.

Jonas Lerman,

Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, Executive Director, Advisory Committee on International Law, United States Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2014-27403 Filed 11-18-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
#### Michael BLACK, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Arthur F. BEELER, Warden—FMC, Butner, NC, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 04-7491.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 2004.

Decided Dec. 28, 2004.

*289Michael Black, Appellant pro se.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Michael Black appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition, in which he challenged conditions of confinement. Because Black may amend his complaint to proceed under *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), rather than § 2241, the district court’s dismissal without prejudice is not a final order and is not subject to appellate review. *See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,*10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DDi Corp.  (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June  30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John K. Stumpf, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                    
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|Date: August 19, 2003 | By: | /s/ JOHN K. STUMPF                     | 
|--------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------- | 
|                      |     |                                        | 
|                      |     | John K. Stumpf Chief Financial Officer | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to DDi Corp. and
will be retained by DDi Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than December 15, 2014.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:

                    1.                     *Olney Bancshares of Texas, Inc.,*                     Olney, Texas; to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of HBank Texas, Grapevine, Texas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 14, 2014.

Margaret McCloskey Shanks,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2014-27370 Filed 11-18-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
9649.

#### Wilson *et al. v.*Wilson.

Bloodworth, J.

1. The grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new. trial are without merit.

2. The plaintiff sued L. R. Wilson and Mrs. Gertrude Wilson on a prom-. *95issory note, alleging that it was transferred to him for value and before maturity. L. R. Wilson, after having filed a plea in which he denied that plaintiff was a bona fide holder for value and also set up an affirmative defense, admitted a prima facie case and assumed' the burden of proofs When he did this it “became incumbent upon him to sustain the burden of overcoming that case and of proving the truth of his own allegations. Civil Code [§ 5746], This he signally failed to do.” The court therefore properly directed a verdict for the plaintiff. *Hunter*v. *Sanders,*113 *Ga.*140 (38 S. E. 406) ; *Branch*v. *American Agricultural Chemical Co.,*22 *Ga. App. 52*(95 S. E. 476); *Thomas*v. *Bishop,*20 *Ga. App.*594 (93 S. E. 169).

Decided November 23, 1918.

Complaint; from city court- of Wrightsville — Judge Blount February 23, 1918.

*A. L.*Hatcher, for plaintiff in error.

*Faircloth & Claxton,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., concurs. .Stephens, J., not presiding.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

JOINT STATUS REPORT

The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by its attorney, JOHN R. LAUSCH, JR., 

United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, and DIEGO VARGAS, by 

his attorney, Michael Leonard, jointly file this status report and state as follows:

1. The indictment in this case charges defendant with one count of 

conspiracy to commit bank theft, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, 371. 

Dkt. 31. Defendant is currently detained and has a trial date of June 21, 2021. Dkt. 

91.

2. Defendant also has an open case before Judge Bucklo. See 20 CR 708.

On June 10, 2021, defendant entered a plea of guilty in case number 20 CR 708 

pursuant to a plea agreement. Defendant’s offense conduct in this case was included 

as a stipulated offense in that plea agreement. See Plea Agreement, attached hereto 

as Exhibit A, ¶ 7. After sentence has been imposed in 20 CR 708, the government will 

move to dismiss the indictment in 20 CR 331 as to defendant Vargas. See Exhibit A, 

¶ 18.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

DIEGO VARGAS

Case No. 20 CR 331-2

Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly

District Judge

Case: 1:20-cr-00331 Document #: 113 Filed: 06/10/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:265
2

3. The parties respectfully request that this Court strike defendant’s June 

21, 2021 trial date in this case.

Respectfully submitted, 

JOHN R. LAUSCH, JR. 

United States Attorney

By: /s/ Mary Katherine McClelland

Mary Katherine McClelland

Assistant U.S. Attorney

219 South Dearborn St., Rm. 500

Chicago, Illinois 60604

(312) 371-1078

Dated: June 10, 2021

Case: 1:20-cr-00331 Document #: 113 Filed: 06/10/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:266
AGENDA

Winter 2010 PSCR Demonstration Network Stakeholders Meeting

7:30 9:00

9:00 9:30

9:30 10:15

10:15 10:30

10:30 11:30

11:30 12:30

12:30 1:30

1:30 3:00

QoS, Priority, and 

Pre-Emption Auditorium

Discussion of how best to architect the 

network in order to test QoS, priority, 

and pre-emption

1:30 3:30

LTE Training Room 1107

Public safety practitioners are invited to this 

two-hour overview of LTE technology

3:00 4:15

Security Auditorium

Discussion of common security schemes 

for the Demonstration Network and for 

SIM cards

3:30 4:00

Lab Tour Group A Lobby

See the Demonstration Network in action 

by touring PSCR's labs

4:15 5:30

8:00 8:30 Lab Tour Group B Lobby

8:30 9:00

9:00 10:00

10:00 10:15

10:30 11:00 Lab Tour Group C Lobby

11:00 11:30 Lab Tour Group D Lobby

12:15 12:45 Lab Tour Group E Lobby

12:45 2:00

2:00 3:15

3:15 4:15

4:15 4:30

Lunch Cafeteria

December 1, 2010

Registration Lobby

Check in to pick up your name tag and welcome packet

Introduction & Logistics Auditorium

Opening remarks and a brief presentation on meeting logistics

Drive Test Video and Q&A Auditorium

Drive test video of the Demonstration Network and a Q&A

Demonstration Network Overview Auditorium

Discussion of how the Demonstration Network fits in the larger public safety broadband picture and 

what information and deliverables the Demonstration Network will produce

Demonstration Network Updates Auditorium

Updates from the four Demonstration Network working groups and information about the 

Demonstration Network architecture

Break 

Wrap Up and Closing Remarks Auditorium

QoS, Priority, and Pre-Emption & Security Session Recap Auditorium

Review and discussion of outcomes from the Day 1 QoS, Priority, and Pre-Emption session and Security 

session

Technical Issues Seminar Auditorium

Learn from three industry representatives about passive intermodulation testing, voice over LTE, and 

application management and standards

Roaming, Billing, and Fraud Detection Auditorium

Discussion of how roaming, billing, and fraud detection are done in the commercial market and how 

the Demonstration Network will test them

December 2, 2010

FCC Update and Interoperability Discussion Auditorium

The FCC will provide an update on regulatory activities and discuss public safety broadband nationwide 

interoperability

Devices Auditorium

Discussion about the device marketplace and public safety's requirements

Break

Future Planning for LTE Testing Auditorium

Discussion of public safety's long-term research, development, testing, and evaluation needs 

10:15 11:45

Testing & Upgrades 

Auditorium

Discussion of the various forums for 

testing eNodeBs, devices, and EPCs

11:45 12:45 Lunch Cafeteria
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

IN RE: TIKTOK, INC.,

CONSUMER PRIVACY

LITIGATION,

This Document Relates to All Cases

MDL No. 2948

Master Docket No. 20-cv-4699 

Judge John Z. Lee

Magistrate Judge Sunil R. Harjani 

JOINT STATUS REPORT

Pursuant to this Court’s orders entered on October 13, 2020 (ECF No. 97) and November 

23, 2020 (ECF No. 107), Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel and Defendants jointly submit this status 

report and state as follows:

1. Current Deadlines/Referral to Magistrate Judge: As ordered by this Court on 

November 23, 2020 (ECF No. 107), Plaintiffs will file a consolidated amended complaint on or 

before December 18, 2020. The matter has not been referred to the Magistrate Judge in any 

fashion.

2. Progress of Discovery: The parties have agreed to meet and confer concerning a 

discovery schedule, if appropriate, after Defendants’ responsive pleading is filed.

3. Status of Briefing on Unresolved Motions: There are no outstanding motions.

4. Status of Settlement Discussions: As the parties apprised this Court in the 

October 30, 2020 Joint Status Report (ECF No. 99), Plaintiffs’ Leadership Group is continuing 

to analyze the executed settlement agreement with the goal of supporting it and suggesting 

revisions if necessary.

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 112 Filed: 12/03/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1869
5. Future Court Dates: This Court has scheduled a status conference for December 

11, 2020 at 2 p.m. The parties suggest that the Court reschedule that conference to take place 

after Plaintiffs’ consolidated amended complaint is filed, sometime in early January. 

Dated: December 3, 2020 Respectfully Submitted,

By: /s/ Katrina Carroll

Katrina Carroll

CARLSON LYNCH, LLP

111 W. Washington St.

Suite 1240

Chicago IL 60602

312.750.1265

kcarroll@carlsonlynch.com

By: /s/ Elizabeth A. Fegan

Elizabeth A. Fegan

FEGAN SCOTT LLC

150 S. Wacker Dr., 24th Floor

Chicago, IL 60606

Ph: 312.741.1019

Fax: 312.264.0100

beth@hbsslaw.com

By: /s/ Ekwan Rhow

Ekwan Rhow

BIRD, MARELLA, BOXER, WOLPERT, NESSIM, 

DROOKS, LINCENBERG & RHOW, P.C.

1875 Century Park East, 23rd Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90067

(310) 201-2100

erhow@birdmarella.com

Plaintiffs Co-Lead Counsel

Dated: December 3, 2020 By: /s/ Anthony J Weibell

Anthony J Weibell 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C.

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

aweibell@wsgr.com 

Lead Counsel for Defendants

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 112 Filed: 12/03/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:1870
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Katrina Carroll, an attorney, affirm that the foregoing was filed on December 3, 2020 

on ECF, which automatically served all counsel of record.

December 3, 2020 By: /s/ Katrina Carroll

Katrina Carroll

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 112 Filed: 12/03/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:1871
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

JORGE GONZALEZ, on behalf of himself )

and all other persons similarly situated, )

known and unknown, )

) Case No. 1:20-cv-04354

Plaintiff, )

) Judge Thomas M. Durkin

v. )

) Magistrate Judge Heather K. McShain

RICHELIEU FOODS, INC., )

) 

Defendant. )

PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 

FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

For the reasons stated in his accompanying Memorandum of Law, Plaintiff, on behalf of 

himself and members of the Settlement Class, requests that the Court grant final approval of the 

parties’ class action settlement and enter his proposed Final Approval Order, which Plaintiff will 

email to the Court’s proposed order email address.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: January 14, 2022 /s/Douglas M. Werman

Attorney for Plaintiff and 

the Settlement Class 

Douglas M. Werman 

(dwerman@flsalaw.com)

Werman Salas P.C.

77 W. Washington Street, Suite 1402

Chicago, IL 60602

(312) 419-1008

Attorney for Plaintiff and the 

Settlement Class

Case: 1:20-cv-04354 Document #: 40 Filed: 01/14/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:302
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned attorney certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on 

Defendant’s counsel of record via the Court’s electronic case filing system on the date reflected 

in the Court’s electronic case filing records.

/s/Douglas M. Werman

Case: 1:20-cv-04354 Document #: 40 Filed: 01/14/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:303
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of The Flooring Zone, Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Michael
Carroll, Principal Executive Officer of The Flooring Zone, Inc., certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: August 4, 2006                                  /s/ Michael Carroll
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Michael Carroll,
                                                     Principal Executive Officer
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

October 23, 2018.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -00877- CV

IN RE GHAZALA BUTT, M.D., JANIS SNYDER, CRNA, AND THE

METHODIST HOSPITAL, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 189th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016-14096



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
On October 10, 2018, relator s Ghazala Butt, M.D., Janis Snyder, CRNA, and
T he Methodist Hospital filed a petition for writ of m andamus in this c ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 ( West Supp. 2017 ); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this c ourt to compel the Honorable Bill Burke , presiding judge2

of the 189th District Court of Harris County, to grant relators’ motion for leave to designate certain persons as responsible third parties

. On October 15 , 2018 , relators filed a motion to dismiss their petition for writ
of mandamus because the parties have agre ed to settle the case

. We GRANT the motion and dismiss relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Busby.
<PAGE>

                                      EXHIBIT 11
                               GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES, INC.
                         COMPUTATION OF BASIC LOSS PER SHARE

The basic loss per share reported in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
1998 and the period ended December 31, 1997 are based on the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  Quarter Ended         Period Ended
                                                 March 31, 1998     December 31, 1997
                                                 ------------------------------------
<S>                                              <C>                <C>
Net loss for the period                           $  (314,103)        $   (33,637)

Weighted average number of common shares used
in computation                                      1,200,000             700,000
                                                 ------------------------------------

Basic loss per share                              $   (0.26)          $   (0.05)
                                                 ------------------------------------
                                                 ------------------------------------
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3906 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3906

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 
            relations treatment) to the products of Ukraine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 2004

 Mrs. Miller of Michigan (for herself and Mr. Knollenberg) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade 
            relations treatment) to the products of Ukraine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV OF THE TRADE ACT OF 
              1974 TO UKRAINE.

    (a) Presidential Determinations and Extensions of Nondiscriminatory 
Treatment.--Notwithstanding any provision of title IV of the Trade Act 
of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.), the President may--
            (1) determine that such title should no longer apply to 
        Ukraine; and
            (2) after making a determination under paragraph (1) with 
        respect to Ukraine, proclaim the extension of nondiscriminatory 
        treatment (normal trade relations treatment) to the products of 
        that country.
    (b) Termination of Application of Title IV.--On and after the 
effective date of the extension under subsection (a)(2) of 
nondiscriminatory treatment to the products of Ukraine, chapter 1 of 
title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 shall cease to apply to that country.
                                 <all>
```