alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 221 (Monday, November 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 68486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27071]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (14-114)]

Notice of Intent To Grant Partially Exclusive License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of intent to grant partially exclusive license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is issued in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209(e) and 
37 CFR 404.7(a)(1)(i). NASA hereby gives notice of its intent to grant 
a partially exclusive license in the United States to practice the 
inventions described and claimed in U.S. Patent No. 6,109,270 entitled 
'' Multimodality Instrument for Tissue Characterization''; U.S. Patent 
No. 6,718,196 entitled ``Multimodality Instrument for Tissue 
Characterization''; and, U.S. Patent No. 6,976,013 entitled ``Body 
Sensing System'' to Perfint Healthcare Corporation USA, having its 
principal place of business at 8201 164th Avenue NE., Suite 200, 
Redmond, WA 98052. The patent rights in these inventions have been 
assigned to the United States of America as represented by the 
Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The 
prospective partially exclusive license will comply with the terms and 
conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

DATES: The prospective partially exclusive license may be granted 
unless, within fifteen (15) days from the date of this published 
notice, NASA receives written objections including evidence and 
argument that establish that the grant of the license would not be 
consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. 
Competing applications completed and received by NASA within fifteen 
(15) days of the date of this published notice will also be treated as 
objections to the grant of the contemplated partially exclusive 
license.
    Objections submitted in response to this notice will not be made 
available to the public for inspection and, to the extent permitted by 
law, will not be released under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 
U.S.C. 552.

ADDRESSES: Objections relating to the prospective license may be 
submitted to Patent Counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, NASA Ames 
Research Center, Mail Stop 202A-4, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000. (650) 
604-5104; Fax (650) 604-2767.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert M. Padilla, Chief Patent 
Counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, NASA Ames Research Center, Mail Stop 
202A-4, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000. (650) 604-5104; Fax (650) 604-
2767. Information about other NASA inventions available for licensing 
can be found online at http://technology.nasa.gov/.

Sumara M. Thompson-King,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014-27071 Filed 11-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
```
1 In The


### Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________ NO

. 09

- 1 3

- 00 389

- C R



### ____________________

IN RE BR ETT W. LIGON, MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY , AND BARBARA ADAMICK, DISTRICT CLERK FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS

_______________________________________________________ ______________ Original Proceeding

________________________________________________________ _____________
ORDER

Brett W. Ligon, Montgomery County District Attorney

, and Barbara

Adamick, District Clerk for Montgomery County, Texas

, filed a petition for writ of

mandamus. The State of Texas, acting through Brett W. Ligon in his capacity as

the District Attorney for Montgomery County, Texas, is a party to a criminal case,

Cause No. 13

- 01

- 00685 CR, The State of Texas v. Leon Davis. Barbara Adamick,

i n her capacity as the District Clerk for Mon t gomery County, Texas, is a non

- party

affected by a trial court order in Cause No. 13

- 01

- 00685 CR. Relator s seek a writ

compelling the Honorable Kelly W. Case, Judge of the 9th Di strict Court, to vacate2 its August 16, 2013 order requiring the District Clerk to provide partially redacted

copies of juror i nformation questionnaires to an expert retained by the real party in

interest, Leon Davis . We note our jurisdiction over this matter and the parties. See

Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004).

Relator s allege that prejudice will result if the documents are produced

before the issues raised in the petition for writ of mandamus can be resolved.

The Court finds temporary relief is necessary to prevent undue prejudice. It

is ORDERED that the trial court’s order of August 16, 2013 in Cause No. 13

- 01

-

00685 CR is STAYED until our Opinion issues or until further order of this Court.

See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(b). No bond is required of the relator s as a condition to

any relief herein granted.

The response of the real party in interest, Leon Davi s, is due September 6

,

2013 , at 5:00 p.m.

MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF GRANTED.

ORDER ENTERED August 27 , 2013.

PER CURIAM

Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7123
In Re: ROBERT AUGUSTINE D’ANJOU, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Audita Querela. (CR-91-86-MU) Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 15, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Augustine D’Anjou, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert Augustine D’Anjou petitions this court for a writ of audita querela, seeking to have this court recall its mandate in United States v. D’Anjou , No. 99-7004 (4th Cir. Nov. 10, 1999) (unpublished). We note that we previously denied D’Anjou’s earlier motion to recall the mandate, and we conclude that a writ of audita querela is not an appropriate means of seeking recall of a court’s mandate. See United States v. Valdez-Pacheco , 237 F.3d 1077, 1079 (9th Cir. 2001). We therefore grant the motion for leave to proceed in forma p auperis and deny the petition for a writ of audita querela. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### A. B. Johns *v.*Wm. O. Woodson, etc.

Executions — Sale Under — Title and Rights of Purchaser — Subsequent Litigation.

The rights of a purchaser at an execution sale become vested at the time it is made and they cannot be divested nor impaired by subsequent litigation between the plaintiff and defendant.

Executions — Sale Under — Encouragement to Purchaser — Estoppel.

Where the defendant recognizes the regularity of the judgment and surrenders to the sheriff in writing, the land sold in satisfaction-of same; to this extent he encourages the purchaser and is therefore estopped to controvert his right to take and hold the estate.

APPEAL PROM PENDLETON CIRCUIT COURT.

June 9, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

It appears that the two judgments upon which the executions issued under which the 34 acres of land were levied upon and sold, were in full force at the time of said levy and sale, and that the application for a new trial in the Smith case was not made until long after Woodson’s purchase.

Whatever rights Woodson acquired under his purchase become vested at the time it was made, and they could not be divested nor impaired by any subsequent litigation between Johns and Smith. At the time of this purchase, Johns recognized the regularity and validity of Smith’s judgment, and actually surrendered to the sheriff in writing the land sold in satisfaction of the same.

To this extent he encouraged Woodson to purchase and he is therefore estopped from controverting the right of his representatives and heirs to take and hold such estate as he acquired under said purchase.

The judgment appealed from permits Johns to redeem, and is certainly as favorable to him as the facts presented by the record could possibly authorize.

If the amount adjudged against him by the court exeeds the aggregate of the two executions, the mistake is a mere clerical misprision which the lower court can correct upon motion from the record itself, and until said court refuses to make the corree*537tion, such mistake cannot be made the ground of reversal in this ourt.

*Lee, for appellant.*

Judgment affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

OUYEINC LTD.,

Plaintiff,

v.

1Baaaai and et al., 

Defendants.

Case No. 20 cv 3488

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL UNDER RULE 41(a)(1)

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Ouyeinc Ltd.

(“Ouyeinc” or “Plaintiff”) hereby dismisses this action with prejudice pursuant to settlement as 

to the following Defendants:

Defendant Name Line No.

wonderflying 252

zhujiey1 271

FashionLola 75

72Yuchuang 2

SumrDay 221

shenzhenshifudisishangmaoyouxiangongsi 198

Roseparadise

Hellomama 103

Luvkis Offical Store

Case: 1:20-cv-03488 Document #: 79 Filed: 11/05/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:316
CloverLover 41

Ferryvivi 79

Wonderful Share 253

Gaodian 91

Nuts go 164

yimengweima93 264

Bibliophile 27

Bestryonecen 26

Syibyl Brlume shop 227

WVR sunshine 255

Melantha 144

ZEX blossom 270

DATED November 5, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ James A. Karamanis

James A. Karamanis

Barney & Karamanis, LLP

Two Prudential Plaza

180 N. Stetson, Ste 3050

Chicago, IL 60601

Tel.: 312/553-5300

Attorney No. 6203479

James@bkchicagolaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF Ouyeinc Ltd.

Case: 1:20-cv-03488 Document #: 79 Filed: 11/05/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:317
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0001049480
<NAME>                          DOUBLECLICK INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
<CURRENCY>                        USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                              322,033
<SECURITIES>                        615,852
<RECEIVABLES>                       129,287
<ALLOWANCES>                         19,929
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    733,458
<PP&E>                               92,840
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    1,356,410
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               144,937
<BONDS>                             250,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                122
<OTHER-SE>                          955,997
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      1,356,410
<SALES>                             110,056
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    110,056
<CGS>                                52,477
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        52,477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     89,493
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (17,443)
<INCOME-TAX>                            931
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (18,374)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        (18,374)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.16)




</TABLE>
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

COOK COUNTY REPUBLICAN 

PARTY,

 No. 1:20-cv-4676

Plaintiff,

v. 

 The Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr.

J.B. PRITZKER et al.,

Plaintiff’s Voluntary Motion to 

Dismiss

Defendants.

Having read this Court’s Order Denying Preliminary Injunction, issued 

September 17, 2020, and because ballots are scheduled to begin being mailed to 

voters tomorrow, September 24, 2020, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court 

dismiss this action in its entirety, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), because 

no opposing party has served an answer or a motion for summary judgment.

Dated: September 23, 2020 Respectfully Submitted, 

COOK COUNTY REPUBLICAN 

PARTY

By: /s/ Brian K. Kelsey

Brian K. Kelsey (Fed. Bar ID # 022874)

bkelsey@libertyjusticecenter.org

James J. McQuaid (Fed. Bar ID # 6290710)

jmcquaid@libertyjusticecenter.org

LIBERTY JUSTICE CENTER

190 South LaSalle Street, Suite 1500

Chicago, Illinois 60603

Telephone (312) 263-7668

Facsimile (312) 263-7702

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case: 1:20-cv-04676 Document #: 63 Filed: 09/23/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:522
2

Certificate of Service

I, James McQuaid, an attorney, certify that I served the foregoing motion on 

all counsel of record by filing it via the Court’s ECF system on September 23, 2020. 

/s/ James J. McQuaid

Case: 1:20-cv-04676 Document #: 63 Filed: 09/23/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:523
Communications Working 

Group
Public Outreach

NIST uses many dissemination 

methods to reach large public 

audiences.

Original content created for the 

methods at right include:

• Lay language text describing NIST 

news, videos, blogs, illustrations, 

infographics, graphics, photos, and 

animations

* PAO = Public Affairs Office
Broadcast Channels

NIST reaches the broad public with news of research results

and activities through 7 major “channels.”

The numbers above show average monthly reach for each

channel. Reach is the potential audience based on subscriptions

or other data. Actual audience size varies with each topic. 
News items

NIST releases about 130-150 

news articles each year

3/1 /2016 to 3/1/2017: 

About 400,000 website page 

views for news articles

Examples of popular news 

topics at right
Videos

Videos substantially increase the 

reach of NIST news items. 

March 2016 – March 2017

• 29 fully produced videos

• 16 social media videos

Recent NIST videos re-published 

by: Washington Post, Smithsonian, 

National Geographic, other major 

news media
Social Media

NIST engages the public in its work 

through daily social media posts and 

its “Taking Measure” Blog

Facebook

Twitter

LinkedIn
New Web Features
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, C. Harril Whitehurst, Jr., certify that:



1.

I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Village Bank and Trust Financial Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2005;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of  the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  March 20, 2006

By: /s/ C. Harril Whitehurst, Jr.

C. Harril Whitehurst, Jr.

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Anthony Greicius","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/anthony-greicius-116962jpl-nasa-gov\/","title":"Digging In: When Rovers Get Dirt on Mars – S4E11","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"P0EJwYjlva\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/on-a-mission\/digging-in-when-rovers-get-dirt-on-mars-s4e11\/\">Digging In: When Rovers Get Dirt on Mars – S4E11<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/on-a-mission\/digging-in-when-rovers-get-dirt-on-mars-s4e11\/embed\/#?secret=P0EJwYjlva\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Digging In: When Rovers Get Dirt on Mars – S4E11” — NASA\" data-secret=\"P0EJwYjlva\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/onamissionblue2021-1400x1400-2.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
H. Res. 612

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

December 17, 1998.

Whereas the President of the United States has ordered military action against Iraq in response to its refusal to comply with international obligations under United Nations

Security Council resolutions;

Whereas up to 24,000 men and women of the United States

Armed Forces are presently involved in operations in and

around the Persian Gulf region with the active participation of British Armed Forces and the support of allies in

the region;

Whereas additional United States Armed Forces are being

deployed to the region; and

Whereas Congress and the American people have the greatest

pride in the men and women of the United States Armed

Forces and strongly support them in their efforts: Now,

therefore, be it

Resolved, That—

(1) the Congress unequivocally supports the men

and women of our Armed Forces who are carrying out

their missions with professionalism, dedication, patriotism, and courage; and
2

•HRES 612 EH

(2) the Congress reaffirms that it should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the

regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq

and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime.

Attest:

Clerk.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3908

To provide for the conveyance of the real property located at 1081 West 

Main Street in Ravenna, Ohio. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 4, 2004

Mr. RYAN of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To provide for the conveyance of the real property located 

at 1081 West Main Street in Ravenna, Ohio.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE. 

4 The Secretary of Labor shall convey, without charge 

5 or consideration, to Portage County, Ohio, all right, title, 

6 and interest of the United States (including all Federal 

7 equity) in and to the parcel of real property located at 

8 1081 West Main Street in Ravenna, Ohio, to the extent 

9 such right, title, or interest was acquired through grants 

10 to the State of Ohio under title III of the Social Security 
2

•HR 3908 IH 

1 Act (42 U.S.C. 501 et seq.) or the Wagner-Peyser Act 

2 (29 U.S.C. 49 et seq.) or through funds distributed to the 

3 State of Ohio under section 903 of the Social Security Act 

4 (42 U.S.C. 1103).

Æ