alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 612 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     December 17, 1998.
Whereas the President of the United States has ordered military action against 
        Iraq in response to its refusal to comply with international obligations 
        under United Nations Security Council resolutions;
Whereas up to 24,000 men and women of the United States Armed Forces are 
        presently involved in operations in and around the Persian Gulf region 
        with the active participation of British Armed Forces and the support of 
        allies in the region;
Whereas additional United States Armed Forces are being deployed to the region; 
        and
Whereas Congress and the American people have the greatest pride in the men and 
        women of the United States Armed Forces and strongly support them in 
        their efforts: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That--
            (1) the Congress unequivocally supports the men and women of our 
        Armed Forces who are carrying out their missions with professionalism, 
        dedication, patriotism, and courage; and
            (2) the Congress reaffirms that it should be the policy of the 
        United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam 
        Hussein from power in Iraq and to promote the emergence of a democratic 
        government to replace that regime.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 229 (Friday, November 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70863-70864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27551]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP14-638-000; CP14-125-000; CP14-126-000]


Atmos Energy Corporation v. American Midstream (Midla) LLC; 
Notice of Meeting

    On March 24, 2014, in Docket No. RP14-638-000, Atmos Energy 
Corporation (Atmos) filed a complaint against American Midstream 
(Midla) LLC (Midla) alleging, among other things, that Midla's open 
season notice and process violate the requirements of section 7(b) of 
the Natural Gas Act. On March 28, 2014, in Docket No, CP14-125-000, 
Midla filed an application under section 7(b) of the NGA to abandon 
segments of its jurisdictional pipeline that are currently used to 
provide service to Atmos, as well as other shippers. Concurrently, 
Midla filed a prior notice filing in Docket No. CP14-126-000 requesting 
to abandon the remainder of its jurisdictional pipeline by sale to an 
affiliate. The parties in the active alternative dispute resolution 
proceeding have requested a meeting with Commission staff to ask 
procedural questions related to any forthcoming filings in the three 
docketed proceedings.
    There will be a morning meeting on November 19, 2014 beginning at 
10 a.m. in Hearing Room 5 at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
888 First Street NE., Washington, DC. The meeting will cover procedural 
questions related to any future filings. If a party has any questions 
and for access to the building, please contact Dispute Resolution 
Division, Support Specialist, Sara Klynsma, at (202) 502-8259.
    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the 
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please 
send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d3b2b0b0b6a0a0bab1babfbaa7aa93b5b6a1b0fdb4bca5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4f2e2c2c2a3c3c262d2623263b360f292a3d2c61282039">[email protected]</span></a> or call toll free 1-866-208-
3372 (voice) or 202-208-8659 (TTY), or send a FAX to 202-208-2106 with 
the required accommodations.


[[Page 70864]]


     Dated: November 13, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-27551 Filed 11-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

MERCIS B.V., 

Plaintiff,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”,

Defendants.

Case No.: 1:20-cv-04293

Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer

Magistrate Judge Susan E. Cox

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby files this Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal, without prejudice, as to the following Defendant(s) identified on Schedule A of the 

Complaint:

NO. DEFENDANT

169 aitemiD

310 zta7_53

306 3c-base

307 home-garden-guru

308 jamesr0615

184 Honlaker Store

309 jewelry-crown

170 baojunUS

372 dreamflying19

DATED: October 27, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt (Bar No. 6207971)

Keith Vogt, Ltd.

111 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1700

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Telephone: 312-675-6079

E-mail: keith@vogtip.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case: 1:20-cv-04293 Document #: 35 Filed: 10/27/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:9031
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document was electronically filed on October 27, 2020 with the Clerk of the Court using the 

CM/ECF system, which will automatically send an email notification of such filing to all registered 

attorneys of record.

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt

Case: 1:20-cv-04293 Document #: 35 Filed: 10/27/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:9032
1

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED COMPLAINT 

PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(6) 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), Defendants Biomat USA, Inc. (“Biomat”), Talecris 

Plasma Resources, Inc. (“TPR”) and Interstate Blood Bank, Inc. (“IBBI”), by their undersigned 

attorneys, hereby move to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint. In support of their Motion to 

Dismiss, Defendants incorporate by reference their Memorandum in Support of Their Motion to 

Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, which is being filed contemporaneously with this 

Motion. 

Dated: December 17, 2021 

By: 

Respectfully submitted, 

BIOMAT USA, INC., TALECRIS PLASMA 

RESOURCES, INC., and INTERSTATE 

BLOOD BANK, INC., 

 /s/ Neil H. Dishman 

 One of Their Attorneys 

BRIAN R. VAUGHAN and JASON 

DARNELL, individually and on behalf of 

all others similarly situated, 

) 

) 

) 

Plaintiffs, 

) 

) Case No.: 20-cv-04241 

) 

 v. ) Honorable Marvin E. Aspen 

) 

BIOMAT USA, INC., TALECRIS 

PLASMA RESOURCES, INC., and 

INTERSTATE BLOOD BANK, INC., 

Defendants.

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole 

Case: 1:20-cv-04241 Document #: 53 Filed: 12/17/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:508
2

Jason A. Selvey 

Neil H. Dishman 

Julia S. Wolf 

Jackson Lewis P.C. 

150 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 2500 

Chicago, Illlinois 60601 

Tel.: 312.787.4949 

Neil.Dishman@jacksonlewis.com 

Jason.Selvey@jacksonlewis.com 

Julia.Wolf@jacksonlewis.com 

Case: 1:20-cv-04241 Document #: 53 Filed: 12/17/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:509
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, Neil H. Dishman, an attorney, certify that on December 17, 2021, I caused a true and 

correct copy of the attached DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ 

AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 

12(b)(6) to be served on the following counsel of record by filing with the Court’s CM/ECF filing 

system: 

David A. Fish 

Mara Baltabols 

The FISH LAW FIRM PC 

200 East Fifth Avenue, Suite 123 

Naperville, Illinois 60563 

(630) 355-7590 

dfish@fishlawfirm.com 

mara@fishlawfirm.com 

 /s/ Neil H. Dishman 

Case: 1:20-cv-04241 Document #: 53 Filed: 12/17/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:510
Exhibit No. 99.1

TRUSTEE STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

I, David J. Kolibachuk, acting on behalf of U.S. Bank Trust National Association (the Trustee), hereby certify that the Trustee has fulfilled its obligations as trustee under the trust
agreement, dated May 20, 2004, between Corporate Asset Backed Corporation, as depositor, and the Trustee, with respect to the CABCO Series 2004-101 Trust (Goldman Sachs Capital I) during the period from January 1, 2011 to December 31,
2011.

Date: March 7, 2012



U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee ofCABCO Series 2004-101 Trust (Goldman Sachs Capital I)By:

/s/ David J. KolibachukName: David J. KolibachukTitle: Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001104252
<NAME> DDi CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,081                   4,081
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,012                  69,012
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,834)                 (2,834)
<INVENTORY>                                     30,306                  30,306
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,695                   9,695
<PP&E>                                         141,349                 141,349
<DEPRECIATION>                                (64,306)                (64,306)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 466,651                 466,651
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,319                  75,319
<BONDS>                                        378,748                 378,748
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           393                     393
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,222)                 (6,222)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   466,651                 466,651
<SALES>                                        101,533                 176,818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               101,533                 176,818
<CGS>                                           65,981                 115,016
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,981                 115,016
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,698                  35,695
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,006                  23,161
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,848                   2,946
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,420)                 (2,495)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,428                     451
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,551)                 (2,551)
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (123)                 (2,100)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)                  (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)                  (0.29)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Thecertifications set forth below are hereby submitted to the Securities andExchange Commission pursuant to, and solely for the purpose of complying with, Section 1350of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code in connection with thefiling on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of MAIR Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”)for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”).

 

Theundersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, hereby certifies that, as of the end of the period covered by theReport:

 

1.               Such Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  PAUL F. FOLEY                      |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                    |
| Paul  F. Foley                          |
| President,  Chief Executive Officer and |
| acting  Chief Financial Officer         |
| July 29,  2008                     |

 

1

----
My name is Spencer Chan and I am a student at the University of Maryland. 

I mostly agree with the criteria proposed in the consumer cybersecurity label draft [1]. 

I think an additional criteria should be added, and that is the software license. At minimum the user should know: is the 

software free (as in freedom) or proprietary? Is it open source or not? (Open source and free software are not the same 

thing [2]) Users should be informed of this because security best practices and responses can differ between these 

licenses models. In the case of open source software, users also have the opportunity to inspect and audit the software 

themselves. This also informs the users of the rights they may have with free software ("to run, copy, distribute, study, 

change and improve the software" [3]) and the rights they may (not) have with nonfree software (namely the right to not 

reverseengineer the software, etc). 

Additionally I hope that NIST may work to standardize software labels. 

Leaving software manufacturers to provide their own labels gives them the possibility to lie or otherwise misrepresent 

various elements of the software. For example, a software company could claim to use encryption, but the specific 

algorithms they use have been shown to be insecure (eg AES with ECB mode [4] or salted MD5 passwords [5]). Or the 

company could have rolled their own crypto algorithms which is potentially risky [6], and users would never know. Users 

need to be guarded against attempts like these. 

Thanks, 

Spencer 

Sources 

1. https://www.nist.gov/document/draft-baseline-criteria-consumer-software-cybersecurity-labeling

2. https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.en.html

3. https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html

4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Block_cipher_mode_of_operation#Electronic_codebook_

5. https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/19906/is-md5-considered-insecure

6. https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/18197/why-shouldnt-we-roll-our-own
Exhibit 99.4



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of DDi Capital Corp.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), John Stumpf, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best
of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  
|------------------
|Date: May 14, 2003
|                  



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to DDi Capital Corp. and will be retained by DDi Capital Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2
 MACQUARIE SECURITISATION LIMITED
OFFICERS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in
the period covered by this annual report, of Macquarie Securitisation Limited;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does
not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be
provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreements, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;4.
    
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under
the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreements and based upon my knowledge and the
annual compliance review required under those agreements, and except as disclosed in
these reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under those agreements; and5.
    
    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicers
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided by an
independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in
the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreements, that is included in these reports.
  /s/ Matthew OHareMatthew OHareDirector
 10
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-3394

LT Case Nos. 2012-CF-2541

 2012-CF-2540

 2012-CF-2538

 2012-CF-2539

 2012-CF-2569

 2012-CF-2568

 2012-CF-2567

 2012-CF-2584

 2013-CF-000006

_____________________________

RICHARD LEACH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County. 

Stephen E. Toner, Jr., Judge. 

Richard Leach, Lowell, pro se. 

No Appearance for Appellee. 

April 9, 2024

PER CURIAM.
2

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, KILBANE, and PRATT, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTHONY RICHARDO TURNER,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. C.E. DUCART, Warden, Pelican Bay State Prison (C.D.C.R.

- Agency); et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 16

- 16914

D.C. No. 4:15

- cv
- 04839

- JSW

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 23, 2017 **

Before: McKEOWN , WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Cal ifornia state prisoner, Anthony Richardo Turner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing for failure to file an amended complaint his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional viola tions . We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion

. Ferdik v. Bonzelet , 963

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 1 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 16914

F.3d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992)

. W e vacate and remand

.
The district court dismissed Turner’s action with prejudice because Turner

failed t o file a timely amended complaint in compliance with its May 15, 2016
order. However, Turner submitted evidence showing that he failed to file a timely
amended complaint because prison officials obstructed his access to the courts.

See Bateman v. U.S. Po stal Serv. , 231 F.3d 122 0, 1223 (9th Cir. 2000) (setting
forth elements of excusable neglect under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1) and explaining
that excusable neglect is a basis for reconsideration of a final order). We vacate

and remand for the district court to consider Turner’s amended complaint in the

first instance

. We note that to the extent the district court’s October 27, 2016 order

determined that Turner’s amended complaint could be dismissed for failure to
comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2), that r uling was in error. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
21 (“Misjoinder of parties is not a ground for dismissing an action. On motion or
on its own, the court may at any time, on just terms, add or drop a party. The court
may also sever any claim against a party.”).

Turner’s claim that the district court ruled on summary judgment is

incorrect.
We reject as without merit Turner’ s contention that the district court denied3 16

- 16914

Turner due process.

We do not consider documents and facts not presented to the district court

.
See United States v. Elias , 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990) (“Documents or facts
not presented to the district court are not part of the record on appeal.”).
Turner’s motion for appointment of counsel, set forth in his opening brief, is

denied.

VACAT ED and REMANDED

.
Exhibit
32.1
  Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  Each of
the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of
Grande Communications, Inc., hereby certifies that, to my knowledge, on the date
hereof:
  1.
              The
      annual report on Form 10-K of Grande Communications Holdings, Inc. for the
      period ending December 31, 2008 filed on the date hereof with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934, as amended; and
  2.
              Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of Grande Communications
      Holdings, Inc.
 
 
 Date:
      March 20, 2009
                /s/
      Roy H. ChestnuttRoy
      H. Chestnutt
                  President,
      Chief Executive Officer, and
                  Chairman
      of the Board
 
 
 Date:
      March 20, 2009
                /s/
      Michael L. WilfleyMichael
      L. Wilfley
                  Chief
      Financial Officer
  The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document. This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes
of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to liability under
that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act
except to the extent this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specifically
incorporated by reference in any such filing.