alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Vivid Learning Systems, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
        Christopher L. Britton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
        certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
        or 15(d)
        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.
   By: /s/Christopher
        L. Britton
 Christopher
        L. Britton
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 Date:
         December 28, 2005
IV

House Calendar No. 274

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 584

[Report No. 105–798]

Further providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4274) making appropriations for the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and

Education, and related agencies, for the fiscal year ending September

30, 1999, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 8, 1998

Mr. DREIER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Further providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4274)

making appropriations for the Departments of Labor,

Health and Human Services, and Education, and related

agencies, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1999,

and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That during consideration of the bill (H.R.

2 4274) making appropriations for the Departments of

3 Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and

4 related agencies, for the fiscal year ending September 30,

5 1999, and for other purposes, in the Committee of the
2

HRES 584 RH

1 Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to House

2 Resolution 564—

3 (1) general debate shall not exceed one hour; and

4 (2) amendments numbered 2 and 3 in House Report

5 105–762 shall be in order before consideration of any

6 other amendment.

House Calendar No. 274

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 584

[Report No. 105–798]

RESOLUTION

Further providing for consideration of the bill

other purposes.fiscal year ending September 30, 1999, and forices, and Education, and related agencies, for thepartments of Labor, Health and Human Serv-(H.R. 4274) making appropriations for the DeOCTOBER 8, 1998

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2001.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Delek Resources, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leonard
Sternheim, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2001, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: February 14, 2005

                                /s/ Leonard Sternheim
                                ---------------------
                                Leonard Sternheim,
                                Chief Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aspire International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10- for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Bok Wong, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

- the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|Date: May 19, 2008 |  | /s/ Bok Wong                
|------------------ |  | ----------------------------
|                   |  | Bok Wong                    
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer and 
|                   |  | Principal Accounting Officer

---
Exhibit 31.1 

CERTIFICATIONS 

I, Jean-Jacques Bienaimé, certify that: 

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc.; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

November 13, 2017

 

|                                |
|--------------------------------|
| /s/ JEAN-JACQUES BIENAIMÉ |
| Jean-Jacques Bienaimé     |
| Chief Executive Officer        |
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse

 Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn Street

 Chicago, Illinois 60604

Office of the Clerk

Phone: (312) 435-5850

www.ca7.uscourts.gov

FINAL JUDGMENT

March 8, 2021

Before: DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

 DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

 AMY J. ST. EVE, Circuit Judge

No. 20-1757

STEPHEN CASSELL and THE BELOVED CHURCH,

Plaintiffs - Appellants

v.

DAVID SNYDERS, et al.,

Defendants - Appellees

 Originating Case Information:

District Court No: 3:20-cv-50153

Northern District of Illinois, Western Division

District Judge John Z. Lee

The judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED, with costs, in accordance with the decision

of this court entered on this date.

form name: c7_FinalJudgment(form ID: 132)

Case: 20-1757 Document: 00713788394 Filed: 03/30/2021 Pages: 1
From: Alexander Einarsson 

Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2022 3:55:39 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)

To: aiframework <aiframework@nist.gov>

Subject: Feedback from today's meeting

Hello, 

My name is Alexander Einarsson, and I brought up two points of feedback to the AI RMF in this 

morning's meeting. I wanted to write down the first point to clarify it and not force you to rely on 

written notes during the meeting:

The Framework focuses primarily on how to ensure that an AI system built from scratch is trustworthy 

and responsible. However, a potential issue that is alluded to, but is not a focus in the AI RMF is that AI 

systems can, and often do, get repurposed from their first use-case. Smaller organizations may be 

inclined to change use-case for their system entirely if they find another, more profitable use-case. 

Similarly, larger organizations may have multiple secondary use-cases for their system, in addition to the 

original one which would have undergone the process outlined in the Framework. It is unlikely that AI 

developers will stop experimenting with different use-cases for their system, given the potential 

positives that may come out of that process, and the reduced cost compared to developing an AI system 

from scratch.

As such, I believe it would behoove the Framework to focus more directly on what the process should be 

like for AI systems that are being repurposed.

Let me know if you have any questions about this or if there is anything you want me to clarify.

With Regards,

Alexander
From: Steve DeLorey 

To: Przybocki, Mark A. (Fed) 

Subject: Trust and Artificial Intelligence 

Date: Thursday, August 5, 2021 5:27:46 PM 

Attachments: HOW CULTURES EVOLVE.docx 

To whom it may concern at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 

Re: “Trust and Artificial Intelligence” (NISTR – 8332- Draft) and “A Risk

Management Framework” (NIST 2021 – 0004 – 0001) 

COMMENT – 

You need to broaden the scale of your perspective. What you are attempting is

not just an exercise in risk management but a very complex attempt to manage

the process of cultural evolution. 

Your stated objective and many aspects of your outlined approach are

appropriate but there are several systems involved in the process of cultural

evolution and they are all complex adaptive systems. Achieving understanding

and consensus among the many individual stakeholders and their related groups

is going to require a tool set which fortunately exists but must be modified and

presented in a format that is recognized and understood by the general

population. – (The current efforts to get a sufficient portion of the population

Covid vaccinated is a good illustration of what will happen if you don’t build in

both understanding and consensus.) 

I recently wrote an article which illustrates some of the complexity. It is not a

scientific treatise, just something to share and discuss with friends. A copy is

attached. If there are any ideas in there that you would like to discuss or request

further detail on, I would be happy to oblige. 

Sincerely 

Robert “Steve” DeLorey
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
         OF 2002 (SUBSECTION (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Vornado
Operating Company (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's
knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

August 5, 2004                           /s/ JOSEPH MACNOW
                                         -----------------
                                         Name:  Joseph Macnow
                                         Title: Chief Financial Officer
b. P.J. Phillips, H. Moon, S.A. Rizvi, P.J. Rauss, 

 "The FERET Evaluation Methodology for Face Recognition Algorithms," 

 IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 22, pp. 

1090-1104, 2000. 

Color FERET Database Release Agreement 

To advance the state-of-the-art in face recognition, the FERET database will be made available 

to researchers in face recognition on a case-by-case basis only. All requests for the FERET 

database must be submitted via the NIST website. To receive a copy of the database, the 

researcher must sign this document and thereby agree to observe the restrictions listed herein. 

Failure to observe the restrictions in this document will result in access being denied for the 

balance of the FERET database and being subject to civil damages in the case of publication of 

images that have not been approved for release, a violation of restriction 3 below. The database 

will be available to researchers via NIST website download only. The images are available in 

ppm format; no other image formats or methods of distribution will be permitted. The 

researcher(s) agrees to the following restrictions on the database: 

1. The database will not be further distributed, published, copied, or further disseminated in any 

way or form whatsoever, whether for profit or not. This includes further distributing, copying or 

disseminating to a facility or organization unit in the requesting university, organization, or 

company. 

2. The images will only appear in technical reports, technical papers, and technical documents 

reporting on face recognition research. There will be no more than 15 images used at a time in a 

publication. 

3. All documents and papers that report on research that uses the FERET database will 

acknowledge the use of the FERET database. Use of the FERET database will be acknowledged 

as follows: "Portions of the research in this paper use the FERET database of facial images 

collected under the FERET program, sponsored by the DOD Counterdrug Technology 

Development Program Office" and citations to: 

 a. P.J. Phillips, H. Wechsler, J. Huang, P. Rauss, 

 "The FERET database and evaluation procedure for face recognition 

algorithms," 

 Image and Vision Computing J, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 295-306, 1998.
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of CompX  International  Inc.  (the
Company)  on Form 10-Q for the  period  ending  June 30,  2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David A.
Bowers, Vice Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/  David A. Bowers
----------------------------------------------
David A. Bowers
Vice Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
August 4, 2003






Note: The certification  the registrant  furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed
"filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  as
amended,  or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  Registration
Statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference,  except as otherwise  expressly
stated in such filing.
NO. 12-20-00045-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF E.N.B.,

A CHILD

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE

COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

Appellant, M.P., filed a notice of appeal from the final order in a suit affecting the parent 

child relationship. On February 13, 2020, the Clerk of this Court notified M.P. that the notice of 

appeal failed to contain the information specifically required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

9.5 and Section 51.017(a) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5 

(service); see also TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.017(a) (West Supp. 2019) (notice of 

appeal must be served on each court reporter responsible for preparing reporter’s record). The 

notice warned that, unless M.P. filed a proper notice of appeal on or before March 16, the appeal 

would be referred to the Court for dismissal. This deadline passed and M.P. has not filed a 

compliant notice of appeal or otherwise responded to this Court’s February 13 notice.

Because M.P. failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 9.5 and Section 51.017(a), the 

appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (on its own initiative after giving ten days’ notice 

to all parties, appellate court may dismiss appeal if appeal is subject to dismissal because appellant 

failed to comply with a requirement of these rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring 

a response or other action within a specified time).

Opinion delivered March 31, 2020.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MARCH 31, 2020

NO. 12-20-00045-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E.N.B., A CHILD

Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 

of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 15-0380-F)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being 

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this 

appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below 

for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Exhibit 3

Case: 1:20-cv-03653 Document #: 16-3 Filed: 06/29/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:313
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

John McDonald, )

)

Plaintiff, ) No. 20 CV 3653

)

v. ) Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer

) 

JB Pritzker, in his official capacity as )

Governor of Illinois, and Grace B. Hou, )

in her official capacity as Secretary of )

the Illinois department of Human Services, )

)

Defendants. )

DECLARATION OF SUPPORT

I, Joshua G. Evans, state that I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein, that 

I am competent to testify and if called to testify would state as follows:

1. I am the President & CEO of the Illinois Association of Rehabilitation Facilities (IARF). 

I have worked for IARF for 15 years, serving as President & CEO since April 1, 2018. 

2. IARF is Illinois largest trade association of community-based providers serving children

and adults with intellectual/developmental disabilities (I/DD) and serious mental illnesses 

(SMI). Formed in 1973, IARF has been the voice of community providers to government 

for nearly 50 years. The Association represents nearly 80 member agencies providing 

services and supports in more than 900 locations across the state of Illinois.

3. As Illinois largest association of I/DD service providers, we remain concerned about the

spread of COVID-19, and our members have worked diligently to implement guidance, 

policies, and procedures issued by the Illinois Department of Human Services Division of 

Developmental Disabilities (DDD), Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH), and the 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) aimed at keeping individuals they 

serve and staff safe.

4. The Association supported the decision by DDD to close Community Day Services

(CDS) on March 17, 2020 as a prudent measure to prevent the transmission of the 

COVID-19 virus to individuals being served in CDS and residing at multiple residential 

sites and those living at home with family/guardians.

Case: 1:20-cv-03653 Document #: 16-3 Filed: 06/29/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:314
5. It is the Association’s understanding that DDD is working on finalizing policies,

procedures, and guidance for reopening CDS on September 1, 2020. We understand that 

this may include individual assessments to ensure CDS are able to open safely and reduce 

the risk of transmission of COVID-19 both in and outside CDS.

6. As DDD regulates CDS, it is our belief that providers require targeted and specific 

guidance from the Division, with input from the Department of Public Health, on the 

steps, practices and procedures that need to be in place for CDS to reopen.

7. We believe providers will need some time to process guidance from DDD to develop and 

implement provider specific strategies to safely support individuals in CDS. As such, we 

don’t believe it would be safe or prudent to rush such a process.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true 

and correct. Executed on June 28, 2020.

 

 

06/28/20

Case: 1:20-cv-03653 Document #: 16-3 Filed: 06/29/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:315
H. Res. 84

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 6, 1997.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and

that they are hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Mr. Blumenauer of Oregon, to rank directly below Mr.

Cummings of Maryland.

COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE: Mr.

Kucinich of Ohio.

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. McDermott of Washington.

Attest:

Clerk.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ROGELIO LAGUNES-DIAZ,Defendant BelowAppellant,

v. STATE OF DELAWARE,Plaintiff BelowAppellee. § § No. 296, 2014 § § § § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware, § in and for Sussex County § Cr. ID 1208001348 § § Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 30, 2014
Before HOLLAND , RIDGELY , and VALIHURA , Justices. O R D E R This 30 th day of September 2014, it appears to the Court tha t: (1) On June 2, 2014, the Court received appellant’s notice of appeal from a Superior Court sentencing order entered on July 3 , 2013. The Clerk issued a notice pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) directi ng appellant to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for his fail ure to file his appeal within the 30 day limitations period. 1 (2) Appellant filed a response to the notice to sho w cause on September 25, 2014. He contends that he cannot read and does speak English and, therefore,

1 Del. Supr. Ct. R. 6(a)(ii).-2-

has been unable to find anyone to assist him until recently. He asserts that the lawyer who represented him in the Superior Court di d not help him and was only interested in having him plead guilty. (3) Time is a jurisdictional requirement. 2 A notice of appeal must be received by the Office of the Clerk of this Court w ithin the applicable time period in order to be effective. 3 An appellant’s pro se status does not excuse a fa ilure to comply strictly with the jurisdictional requirement s of Supreme Court Rule 6. 4 Appellant’s lack of language proficiency is insuffi cient to warrant the equitable tolling of the time to file an appeal. 5 Unless the appellant can demonstrate that the failure to file a timely notice of appeal is attrib utable to court-related personnel, his appeal cannot be considered. 6 (4) There is nothing to reflect that appellant’s fa ilure to timely appeal is attributable to court personnel. Consequently, this case does not fall within the exception to the general rule that mandates the tim ely filing of a notice of appeal. Thus, the Court concludes that the within appeal mu st be dismissed.

2 Carr v. State , 554 A.2d 778, 779 (Del.), cert. denied , 493 U.S. 829 (1989). 3 Del. Supr. Ct. R. 10(a). 4 Smith v. State , 47 A.3d 481, 486-87 (Del. 2012).

5 Quintero v. State , 945A.2d 1168 (Table), 2008 WL697599 (Del.Mar. 17, 2008). 6 Bey v. State , 402 A.2d 362, 363 (Del. 1979).-3-

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT: /s/ Henry duPont Ridgely Justice