alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1033174\306896082.v1

U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission v. Long Leaf Trading Group, 

Inc., et al. 

Case Number: 20-cv-03758

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Jeremy S. Ruth

Attorney name (type or print): Andrew S. May

Firm: Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP

Street address: 151 North Franklin Street, Suite 2500

City/State/Zip: Chicago, Illinois 60606

Bar ID Number: 6229796 

(See item 3 in instructions)

Telephone Number: 312.704.3400

Email Address: amay@hinshawlaw.com

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case? Yes No

Are you acting as local counsel in this case? Yes No

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar? Yes No

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? Yes No

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

 Appointed Counsel

If appointed counsel, are you a

Federal Defender

CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this Court’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 U.S.C.§1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath. 

Executed on November 2, 2020

Attorney signature: S/ Andrew S. May

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 37 Filed: 11/02/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:299
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04699

Honorable John Z. Lee

TikTok Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, April 6, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Motion to appear pro hac vice

[147] is granted. Attorney Jonathan Gardner for Brian Behnke and Joshua Dugan added.

Mailed notice(sxw, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 150 Filed: 04/06/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:3007
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-20879

Summary Calendar

ALPINE VIEW COMPANY LIMITED; BJORN HANSEN,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

VERSUS

ATLAS COPCO A.B.; ATLAS COPCO ROBBINS;

ATLAS COPCO COMPRESSORS INCORPORATED;

AND ATLAS COPCO COMPTEC INCORPORATED,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

H-95-CV-4477)

August 20, 1998

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:*

During the pendency of this appeal, our Court sitting en banc

decided Marathon Oil Co. v. A.G. Ruhrgas, No. 96-20361, 1998 WL

329842 (5th Cir. June 22, 1998) (en banc). The procedural

circumstances involved in this appeal are very similar to those

involved in Marathon Oil and our decision herein is controlled by
2

that en banc decision.

Accordingly, we vacate the following orders entered in the

court below:

a. Memorandum and Recommendation entered under date of July

31, 1996 by the magistrate judge which recommended (i) that

defendant Atlas Copco AB’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal

jurisdiction (docket entry 22) be granted; (ii) that defendant

Atlas Copco Robbins’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal

jurisdiction (docket entry 26) be granted; and (iii) that

plaintiffs’ motion to remand this case (docket entry 16) be denied

as moot.

b. The Order of the district court entered on October 1,

1996 adopting the magistrate judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation

entered under date of July 31, 1996 as described in the foregoing

subparagraph;

c. The Memorandum and Recommendation entered under date of

August 1, 1996 by the magistrate judge which recommended that the

motions of defendants Atlas Copco Comptec, Inc. and Atlas Copco

Compressors, Inc. to dismiss for forum non conveniens (docket

entries 4 and 9) be granted; and

d. The Order of the district court entered under date of

October 1, 1996 adopting the magistrate judge’s Memorandum and

Recommendation entered under date of August 1, 1996 as described in

the foregoing subparagraph.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case be remanded to the
3

district court for a determination as to whether the federal

district court has subject matter jurisdiction of the cause of

action as removed from the state court.
MEP	Advisory	Board Meeting

Agenda

March	1,	2016

Ronald	Reagan	Building	&	International	Trade	Center

Washington,	DC

Monday, February 29

5:00pm – 7:00pm Informal Networking Reception Liaison Capitol Hill –

Lobby- 415 New Jersey 

Ave

6:30pm – 9:00pm National Advisory Board Dinner Capital Grille

601 Pennsylvania Ave

Tuesday, March 1

7:30am – 8:30am Breakfast (on your own) Reagan Bldg

Food Court

8:30am – 9:15am

(MEP Advisory Board 

with Local Boards)

Meeting Logistics

Welcome/Introductions

• Welcome, introductions by all

participants and agenda review

• Importance of National and 

Center Boards

• Overview of the Vision and 

Strategic Objectives for MEP

Zara Brunner, NIST MEP

Vickie Wessel, Board Chair, 

MEP Advisory Board 

Phillip Singerman, Associate 

Director of Innovation & 

Industry Services, NIST

Carroll Thomas, Director, 

NIST MEP

Reagan Bldg, Rotunda

9:15am – 10:15am

(MEP Advisory Board 

with Local Boards)

MEP National Board- Sharing and 

Linking the Network

Discussion and review of National 

Advisory Board, Board Governance 

Subcommittee

• Discussion of MEP National 

Board Governance 

Subcommittee – better 

collaboration with local boards

• Discussion of how the national

and local Boards work together 

and share issues in order to 

increase the impact MEP is 

having with Manufacturers

• Report-Out

Vickie Wessel, Board Chair, 

MEP Advisory Board

Mike Simpson, NIST MEP

Reagan Bldg, Rotunda
MEP	Advisory	Board Meeting

Agenda

March	1,	2016

Ronald	Reagan	Building	&	International	Trade	Center

Washington,	DC

10:15am – 10:45am Break - National Board moves to 

Horizon Room for formal Board 

Meeting

10:45am – 11:30am State of MEP and Director’s Update Carroll Thomas, Director, 

NIST MEP

Reagan Bldg, Horizon 

Room

11:30am – 12:00pm NIST Director’s Charge to the MEP 

Advisory Board

Phillip Singerman, Associate 

Director of Innovation & 

Industry Services, NIST

Reagan Bldg, Horizon 

Room

12:00pm – 1:15pm Lunch Elephant & Castle

12th & PA Ave

1:15pm – 1:45pm Technology Acceleration Subcommittee 

Final Report-out on follow on activities

Jeff Wilcox, Vice Chair, MEP 

Advisory Board

Mark Troppe, NIST MEP

Reagan Bldg, Horizon 

Room

1:45pm – 2:15pm National Board Governance 

Subcommittee – Final Report-Out

Final Report-out on follow on activities

Vickie Wessel, Board Chair, 

MEP Advisory Board

Mike Simpson, NIST MEP

Reagan Bldg, Horizon 

Room

2:15pm – 2:45pm 2017 MEP National Summit

Brief and Discussion

Dave Cranmer and Zara 

Brunner, NIST MEP

Reagan Bldg, Horizon 

Room

2:45pm – 3:00pm Break

3:00pm – 3:45pm Advisory Board Review of Report Draft Carroll Thomas, Director, 

NIST MEP

Reagan Bldg, Horizon 

Room

3:45pm – 4:00pm Wrap-Up

5:00pm – 7:00pm Advisory Board Reception The Russel Building
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         961,329
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,021,557
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,273
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,500
<COMMON>                                         1,700
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,854,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,021,557
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               557,579
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (557,579)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (557,579)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.40)
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 10.1
 BEACON ENERGY CORP.
 AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED
STOCK SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT
AND STOCKHOLDER AGREEMENT
 Agreement Company Investors Investor Metalico
 , Original
Agreement)
    1. AMENDMENT OF SECTION 5, CONDITIONAL RIGHT TO SELL.
  5. CONDITIONAL RIGHT TO SELL.
 5A. Sale Rights. Paragraph 5C Paragraph 5C Sale
Notice




---



##### 



Paragraph 5A(i)
 Paragraph 5A(i) Paragraph 5C and 5A
 Paragraph 5A(i)(a) Paragraph 5A(i)(b)
 5B. Stock Rights. Paragraph 5A(i)(b) Paragraph 5A(i)(b) Paragraph 5A(i)(b)
 5C. Public Trading Event. Paragraph 5 Public Trading Event
 (i)
    
    as of April 30, 2008 the Company shall have completed the filing of an
appropriate application and required supporting materials with any of the following
national securities exchanges or listing services providing a platform for public
trading in the Companys common stock: the American Stock Exchange, the New York Stock
Exchange, the NASDAQ market, or the OTC Bulletin Board (each a Traditional Trading
Platform) or(ii)
    
    as of July 31, 2008 completed an alternative listing arrangement through a
reverse merger with a public shell, a listing on the Pink Sheets trading system,
acquisition by a Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC) or any other similar
mechanism deemed appropriate by the Companys Board of Directors (each a
Non-Traditional Trading Platform and, collectively together with the
Traditional Trading Platform each a Trading Platform ).
  3. AMENDMENT OF SECTION 10A Consent to Amendments.
  10A. Consent to Amendments.




---



##### 



4. NO FURTHER AMENDMENT
  5. MISCELLANEOUS.
 5A. Consent to Amendments.
 5B. Survival of Representations and Warranties; Entire Agreement.
 5C. Successors and Assigns.
 5D. Additional Stock.
 5E. Governing Law.
 5F. Counterparts.
 5G. Severability.




---



##### 



BEACON ENERGY CORP.By:Carlos E. AgüeroChairman METALICO, INC.By:Carlos E. AgüeroChief Executive Officer The foregoing Agreement is hereby accepted as of the date first above written.INVESTORSBy:SignatureName:Please Print
**EXHIBIT      34.2**

|  **ERNST                    & YOUNG** |                     ▪ |  **Ernst                      & Young LLP**       |                              ▪ |  Phone:                    (212) 773-3000 |
|------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                                           |                                                                                                                            |  5                    Times                    Square |                                                                                                                                                                                  |  www.ey.com                               |
|                                           |                                                                                                                            |  New                    York, New York 10036-6530     |                                                                                                                                                                                  |                                           |
|                                           |                                                                                                                            |                                                       |                                                                                                                                                                                  |                                           |

|   |   |   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|   |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 74

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Commerce in the

One Hundred Fifth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 25, 1997

Mr. BLILEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Oversight

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on

Commerce in the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Commerce

4 (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Commit5 tee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses,

8 not more than $14,671,538 for the One Hundred Fifth

9 Congress.
2

HRES 74 IH

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

2 Of the amount specified in section 1—

3 (1) not more than $7,179,440 shall be available

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

5 noon on January 3, 1997, and ending immediately

6 before noon on January 3, 1998; and

7 (2) not more than $7,492,098 shall be available

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

9 noon on January 3, 1998, and ending immediately

10 before noon on January 3, 1999.

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner

15 directed by the Committee on House Oversight.

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by

19 the Committee on House Oversight.

Æ
Comments template for Draft SP 800-207 Please respond by November 22, 2019 Submitted by: IDSA Date: 11/21/19 

All comments will be made public as-is, with no edits or redactions. Please be careful to not include confidential business or personal information, otherwise 

sensitive or protected information, or any information you do not wish to be posted. 

Comment Template for First Public Draft of Four 

Principles of Explainable Artificial Intelligence 

Submit comments by October 15, 2020 to: 

explainable-AI@nist.gov

(Draft NISTIR 8312) 

Comment Commenter Commenter name Paper Line # (if Paper Comment (Include rationale for Suggested change 

Monitaur.ai Andrew Clark 134 

Interpretability should be added 

as another property of trust in AI 

systems. Interpretability is the 

ability to ascertain the 

mechanics of how a model is 

constructed and decisions are 

made. Explainability is the ability 

to understand in an intelligible 

manner the result of a model 

outcome. 

Include interpretability as a tenet of trust in AI 

systems. 

Monitaur.ai Andrew Clark 134 

Bias is not a tenet of trust in AI 

system. The lack of bias could be, 

but clarifty and care should be taken 

whenever bias is mentioned. 

Bias should be removed or modified to say a 

lack of bias. 

 Type: E - Editorial, G - General T - Technical 1 of 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments template for Draft SP 800-207 Please respond by November 22, 2019 Submitted by: IDSA Date: 11/21/19 

Monitaur.ai Andrew Clark 333 

Counterfactuals can also be the 

ability to reperform a 

transaction to perform a "What 

if" analysis postfact. 

Interrogating a model to see 

where the inflection points are 

very helpful to provide end-users 

the explanation they need, 

especially for "black box" models 

where other explanation 

approaches may prove difficult. 

This approach is described as 

starting line 372. Provide a more 

concrete separation and 

explanation on the two different 

types of counterfactuals, the one 

described above and the one 

given in section 5.3. Define both 

around line 333 

Add another sentence or two around the other 

definition of counterfactuals 

Monitaur.ai Andrew Clark 358 

Models that are self-explainable 

have the property of 

interpretability 

 Type: E - Editorial, G - General T - Technical 2 of 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments template for Draft SP 800-207 Please respond by November 22, 2019 Submitted by: IDSA Date: 11/21/19 

Monitaur.ai Andrew Clark 

As a general comment, for a 

model to be truly trustworthy, 

the model needs to be audited 

and ideally monitored by an 

objective party. These Four 

Principles provide helpful 

guidance that helps to mitigate 

risks, but their success in 

mitigating those risks will only be 

realized if they are incorporated 

as part of a broad governance 

program overseen and validated 

by objective parties. 

 Type: E - Editorial, G - General T - Technical 3 of
Exhibit 10.101


 


AMENDMENT


CALIFORNIACARE MEDICAL SERVICES AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment to the CaliforniaCare
Medical Services Agreement is entered into at Woodland Hills, Los Angeles
County, California, as of November 1,
1999  between Blue Cross of California and its Affiliates (“BLUE
CROSS”) and Professional Care IP A Medical
Group, Inc.  (“PARTICIPATING MEDICAL GROUP”).


 


RECITALS


 


A.          BLUE
CROSS and PARTICIPATING MEDICAL GROUP have previously entered into a
CaliforniaCare Medical Services Agreement effective November 1, 1999 whereby PARTICIPATING MEDICAL GROUP is
designated as a Participating Medical Group. 
The forgoing agreement and any amendments thereto shall be referred to
herein as the “Agreement”.


 


B.           Pursuant
to Section 16.01 of the Agreement, the parties now desire to amend the
Agreement as set forth below.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED:


 


I.            Section 4.02H(5) of the Agreement is deleted in its
entirety and is hereby replaced with the following:


 


Members may directly access
PARTICIPATING MEDICAL GROUP Physicians in the following specialties without the
prior authorization of PARTICIPATING MEDICAL GROUP’s Utilization Management
Program:


 


(a)   Dermatology


(b)   Allergy


(c)   Obstetrics/Gynecology


(d)   Ear,
Nose and Throat


 


In addition to any other amounts
due hereunder, PARTICIPATING MEDICAL GROUP shall receive a payment of *** PMPM
(not adjusted for Member Age/Sex Factors or Benefit Plan Factors) for each
Member assigned to PARTICIPATING MEDICAL GROUP who is entitled under the
Member’s Benefit Agreement to direct access for all four of the above-mentioned
specialities.


 












*** Confidential
Information omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.


 


1

















 


Upon
acceptance of the parties, this Amendment, as of the date specified on page one
hereof, shall become a part of the Agreement, and all provisions of the
Agreement not specifically inconsistent herewith shall remain in full force and
effect.


 


 


	
  BLUE
  CROSS OF CALIFORNIA

  	
  PARTICIPATING MEDICAL GROUP

  Professional Care IP A Medical Group, Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Signature:

  	
  /s/ Barry Ford

  	
   

  	
  Signature:

  	
  /s/ Ed Rotan

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Name:Barry
  Ford

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Ed Rotan 

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Title:

  	
  Vice
  President

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  President

  	
   

  
	
  Network Development & Management

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Date

  	
  12/13/99

  	
   

  	
  Date

  	
  11/30/99

  	
   

  
											



 


2