alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.



---



In connection with the Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on Form 10-QSB of The Havana Republic, Inc.
(the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen Schatzman, Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2)    the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:    February 14, 2003 |  | /s/    Stephen SchatzmanStephen Schatzman Director
|-------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# For Further Information Contact:

                        Substantive program information may be obtained from Debbie M. Jackson, Acting Executive Secretary, NCVHS, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 3311 Toledo Road, Room 2339, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, telephone (301) 458-4614. Summaries of meetings and a roster of committee members are available on the NCVHS home page of the HHS Web site:                         *http://www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/​*, where further information including an agenda will be posted when available.                    

Should you require reasonable accommodation, please contact the CDC Office of Equal Employment Opportunity on (301) 458-4EEO (4336) as soon as possible.

Dated: November 10, 2014.

James Scanlon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (Science and Data Policy), Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.

[FR Doc. 2014-27200 Filed 11-17-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4151-05-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Abby Graf","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/agraf\/","title":"Eclipse Across North America 2024","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"TMKdpHW0Be\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/houston-we-have-a-podcast\/eclipse-across-north-america-2024\/\">Eclipse Across North America 2024<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/houston-we-have-a-podcast\/eclipse-across-north-america-2024\/embed\/#?secret=TMKdpHW0Be\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Eclipse Across North America 2024” — NASA\" data-secret=\"TMKdpHW0Be\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/ep-330-featured-img.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Richard L. Schreck, Secretary/Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of
Airxcel, Inc., certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Airxcel, Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
      prepared;

b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of
      the Evaluation Date;

5.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a)    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls; and

6.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: 8-12-04

By: /s/ Richard L. Schreck
    -----------------------------------
Richard L. Schreck
Secretary/Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.5

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Inmarsat Investments Limited (the "Company") for the annual period ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Periodic Report"), I, Andrew Sukawaty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  | /s/ANDREW SUKAWATYAndrew Sukawaty Chief Executive Officer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------

Date:
April 29, 2005

---



QuickLinks
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 14

- 10412 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:99

- cr
- 00030

- JES

- DNF

- 2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus NATHANIEL WILLIS PITTS, JR.,
Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (April 3, 2015) Before HULL , WILLIAM PRYOR and JULIE CARNES , Circuit Judges.
PER CUR IAM: Nathaniel Willis Pitts, Jr. appeals his sentence of 24 month s of imprisonment Case: 14-10412 Date Filed: 04/03/2015 Page: 1 of 22 following the second revocat ion of his supervised release. Pitts argues that his
sentence is substantively unreasonable . We affirm.
Pitts is barred from challenging the rea sonableness of his sentence. Under the doctrine of invited error, when a defendant invites or induces the district court to impose a p articular sentence, t he defendant cannot complain about that sentence on appeal

. United States v. Brannan , 562 F.3d 1300, 1306 (11 th Cir. 2009). A fter the district court revoked Pitts’s supervised release and ordered him to serve 9 months of imprisonment and 24 months of supervised release, Pitts interjected that “if [he was] going to go to prison, [he] might as well get it o ver with” and he

want ed to “ serve the 24 months straight

. ” W hen questioned by the district court , Pitts confirme d that he wanted a sentence of 24 months of impris onment

. Pitts

cannot contest the substantive reasonableness of a sentence that he requested. And even if the doctrine of invited error did not apply, we would affirm Pitts’s sentence within the guideline range as substantively reasonable.
W e AFFIRM Pitts’s sentence. Case: 14-10412 Date Filed: 04/03/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Workshop Agenda

TUESDAY, JANUARY 24 

10:00 AM Opening Remarks 

10:05 AM Plenary 1: Global plastics production and pollution: Data challenges and needs

- Ruben Bibas, OECD 

10:45 AM Session 1: Plastics Production Assessment and Benchmarking

- Tonya Randell, Stina Inc

- Craig Cookson, American Chemistry Council

- Ian Mead, U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (tentative) 

11:45 AM Breakout Discussions 

12:30 PM BREAK (30 minutes) 

1:00 PM Session 2: Int'l/National/State/Municipal Reporting on Plastic Waste: Challenges 

and Opportunities

- Kim Cochran, EPA Facts and Figures 

- Aaron Burman, The Recycling Partnership

- Nicole Portley, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 

- Mark Fisher, Council of the Great Lakes Region

2:00 PM Breakout Discussions 

2:45 PM Closing Remarks 

3:00 PM Adjourn 
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 25 

10:00 am Plenary 2: From astronomy to cancer imaging: lessons learned in scaling 

petabytes of data and turning patterns into systematic processes

- Alex Szalay, Institute for Data Intensive Science, Johns Hopkins University

10:45 AM Session 3: Pollution Assessment and Benchmarking

- Taylor Maddelene, Circularity Informatics Lab, University of Georgia

- Hillary Burgess, NOAA Marine Debris Monitoring Program

- Jennifer Webster, NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information

- Romell Nandi, EPA Office of Water 

11:45 AM Breakout Discussions 

12:30 PM BREAK (30 minutes) 

1:00 PM Session 4: Life Cycle Analysis and Other Decision Tools

- Peter Arbuckle, USDA

- Troy Hawkins, Argonne National Lab

- Kim Cochran, EPA WARM 

2:00 PM Breakout Discussions 

2:45 PM Closing Remarks 

3:00 PM Adjourn 

THURSDAY, JANUARY 26 

10:00 AM Plenary 3: Canadian approach to plastics and plastic pollution

- Tracey Spack, Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) 

10:45 AM Session 5: Data Harmonization and Accessibility

- David Jankowski, United States Trade Representative

- Alyson Fick, ASTM International

- Julia Farber, Eastman/ASTM International

- Laura Thompson, GreenBlue

11:45 AM Breakout Discussions 

12:30 PM BREAK (30 minutes) 

1:00 PM Session 6: Strategic Planning for a Path Forward

- Interagency panel discussion: NIST, EPA, DoE, NSF, USDA, DoS

2:00 PM Breakout Discussions 

2:45 PM Reconvene to Discuss Strategies for a Path Forward 

3:00 PM Adjourn
EXHIBIT 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

I, Richard Cohen, Chief Financial Officer of Baseline Oil & Gas Corp., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the
"Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 17, 2007

                                                         /s/ Richard Cohen
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Richard Cohen
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Consensus Safety Measurement 

Methodologies for ADSEquipped Vehicles

June 25-26, 2019

1

Logos are trademarks of the corresponding corporate partners in the U.S. and other countries
Innovation through Collaboration: Bringing 

Automated Mobility Technology to Arizona

Kevin Biesty

Deputy Director, Arizona Department of Transportation

kbiesty@azdot.gov; 602.712.7550

Marisa Paula Walker

Senior Vice President, Arizona Commerce Authority

marisaw@azcommerce.com; 602.845.1297

2
Early Attempts and Recent 

Progress

• 2012 – HB 2679 fails to move forward, following year HB 2167, again fails to get traction

• 2015—Governor Ducey signs EO on AZ’s process to safely test automated and connected 

vehicle technologies

• 2017—HB 2159 passes, allowing truck platooning demonstrations on AZ highways.

• 2018—Governor Ducey issues an EO reflecting advancements in testing and technology

• 2018—HB 2422 passes allowing for “personal delivery devices” to operate in AZ

• 2018—Governor Ducey establishes Institute for Automated Mobility to advance safety, 

science and policy

• 2019—HB 2132 passes allowing for the operation of “personal mobile cargo carrying 

devices”
Where we are Now 

and Lessons Learned • Testing everything from small delivery vehicle to 

commercial motor vehicles

• Arizona municipalities are actively involved in 

the safe development of these innovations.

• There is alignment of the mission with state and 

local governments to continue evolving our 

regulations

• We are constantly learning and evolving • We had to be willing to challenge the status quo • Utilized the authorities we already had • Collaboration is critical

4
Arizona one of 34 States 

testing approximately 1400 

“self-driving” vehicles owned 

by 80 companies

5
6
THANK YOU
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2706

DONNA PUGH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

AIG LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK;

AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY; NATIONAL FIRE

INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. James A. Beaty, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-96-135-6)

Submitted: April 30, 1999 Decided: May 26, 1999

Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donna Pugh, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph W. Moss, Matthew L. Mason,

MOSS & MASON, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Donna Pugh sued the AIG Life Insurance Company (AIG) seeking

benefits under her employer’s Permanent Total Disability insurance

benefits plan, which is governed by the Employee Retirement Income

Security Act of 1974, as amended. Pugh appeals from the orders

denying her motion for a jury trial, granting summary judgment to

AIG, and dismissing her action. We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Pugh v. AIG Life Ins. Co., No. CA-96-135-6 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 11,

1998; Oct. 13 & 16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
** **

**EXHIBIT 32.01**

**SECTION1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

**Inconnection with this quarterly report of BlackRock Futures Investments L.P.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”),I Edward Rzeszowski, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2. The informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 14,2006

----

| By  /s/ EDWARD RZESZOWSKI     |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| Edward Rzeszowski             |
| President                     |
| (Principal Executive Officer) |

** **

 

1

----
Case: 1:20-cr-00447 Document #: 22-2 Filed: 01/19/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:51
#### WM. B. HOWSE, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ALEXANDER SUMMER AND EDITH SUMMER, INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS ALEXANDER SUMMER CO., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Submitted May 1, 1945

Decided May 18, 1945.

Before Justices Case, Bodixe and Pebskie.

For the appellants, Morrison, *Lloyd & Morrison (Sydney V. Stoldt).*

For the respondent, *William V. Breslin.*

The opinion of the court ivas delivered by

Bodixe, J.

This is a suit for commissions. We conclude that there should have been a judgment of nonsuit. The parties are duly licensed real estate brokers hailing places of businesses in Teaneck, Bergen County, in this state.

The defendant had the exclusive listing of a certain property' in Teaneck and verbally extended to the plaintiff, and other brokers, the right to co-operate in making sale of the premises. The broker making the actual sale would receive two-thirds of the commission, the exclusive agent one-third. All offers of purchase were subject to acceptance by the owner.

Plaintiff made an offer which the owner rejected. It then made an offer to purchase on its oivn account. This the owner rejected because a resale might he made to a person who would not he pleasing to him.

There certainly was no obligation upon the part of the defendant other than to communicate the plaintiff’s offer to *48the owner. His rejection of the offer gave to the plaintiff no vested right to commissions and no cause of action against the defendant on the facts proved.

The facts in this case are somewhat analogous to those appearing in *Vreeland*v. *Vetterlein,*33 *N. J. L.*247. In this case, there was an exclusive agent who had co-operating agents. All offers were subject to acceptance by the owners. In the case cited an owner employed several brokers. His duty was only to remain neutral to them. In this case the exclusive agent was under a duty to remain neutral as between the several co-operating brokers. This it appears to have done. The ultimate choice of buyer was with the seller and this choice seems not to have been influenced by anything the defendant or its servants did or said.

The judgment is reversed, with costs.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DoubleClick Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kevin P.
Ryan, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                    /s/ KEVIN P. RYAN
                                    -----------------
                                    Kevin P. Ryan
                                    Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 11, 2003

        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to DoubleClick Inc. and will be retained by DoubleClick and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                       3