alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas

Pension Fund, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.:

1:20−cv−03974

Honorable Gary

Feinerman

Sansumar, Inc.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, August 25, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Status hearing held and

continued to 9/11/2020 at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiffs reported that they have reached a settlement

and that a consent judgment soon will be filed. Attorneys/Parties should appear for the

9/11/2020 hearing by calling the Toll−Free Number: (877) 336−1828, Access Code:

4082461. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing

(use toll free number). Please, please be sure to keep your phone on mute when you are

not speaking. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general

prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings.

Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued

media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or

any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court.Mailed notice.(jlj, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03974 Document #: 10 Filed: 08/25/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:20
EXHIBIT 32.2

  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2065 of BrightStar Information Technology
Group, Inc. (the "Form 10-Q"), I, John Coogan, Chief Financial Officer, of
BrightStar Information Technology Group, Inc., certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (3)   such Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 fully
            complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
            Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (4)   the information contained in such Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
            period ended March 31, 2006 fairly presents, in all material
            respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
            BrightStar Information Technology Group, Inc.


      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to BrightStar
Information Technology Group, Inc. and will be retained by BrightStar
Information Technology Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: May 15, 2006                        BY:    /s/ John M. Coogan
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 John M. Coogan
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

                                       21
Exhibit 32.2

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of MPC Corporation (the “*Company*”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “*Report*”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|              | By:    | /s/ Curtis Akey                              |
|-------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
| December 21, 2007 |   | Curtis Akey                                  |
|              |   | Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 613

Providing a vote for the Delegate to the Congress from the District of

Columbia in the consideration by the House of Representatives of any

resolution impeaching the President or Vice President of the United

States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 18, 1998

Ms. NORTON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Providing a vote for the Delegate to the Congress from

the District of Columbia in the consideration by the

House of Representatives of any resolution impeaching

the President or Vice President of the United States.

Whereas rule IX of the Rules of the House of Representatives provides that questions of privilege shall arise whenever the rights of the House collectively or the Members

individually in their representative capacity are affected;

Whereas under the precedents, customs, and traditions of the

House pursuant to rule IX, a question of privilege has

arisen in cases involving the constitutional prerogatives of

the House and of Members of the House; and
2

•HRES 613 IH

Whereas the House is prepared to consider a resolution impeaching the President, and the Delegate to the Congress

from the District of Columbia seeks to assert the constitutional prerogative to cast a vote in the consideration

of the resolution: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. PROVIDING VOTE FOR DELEGATE FROM THE

3 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN CONSIDERATION

4 OF PRESIDENTIAL IMPEACHMENT RESOLU5 TIONS.

6 Pursuant to section 2 of article I of the Constitution

7 and the twenty-third article of amendment thereto grant8 ing the people of the District of Columbia the right to

9 vote in presidential elections, the Delegate to the Congress

10 from the District of Columbia shall be permitted to cast

11 a vote in the House of Representatives in the same man12 ner as a member of the House in the consideration by

13 the House of any resolution impeaching the President or

14 Vice President of the United States.

15 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

16 Section 1 shall apply with respect to any resolution

17 impeaching the President or Vice President of the United

18 States that is considered by the House of Representatives

19 after the adoption of this resolution.

Æ
TO VOTE: Use the No. 2 Pencil to connect the broken arrow pointing to your choice, like this:
For each office, vote only for the number of candidates indicated. {DO NOT USE RED INK)

ELECTORS OF
PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT
OF THE UNITED STATES

VOTE FOR NO MORE THAN ONE £4)

JOHN F. KERRY

JOHN EDWARDS ee

DAVID COBB TEA
PATRICIA LaMARCHE GREEN PARTY
MICHAEL BADNARIK 0
RICHARD CAMPAGNA ange
JAMES HARRIS eae aetna
MARGARET TROWE si ik pm a
GEORGE W. BUSH re
DICK CHENEY aa a al
RALPH NADER a
PETER MIGUEL CAMEJO —aTae
Wirite in, f any a=)

DELEGATE TO THE
U. S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

WOTE SOR NO MORE THAN ONE (4)
ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON SeMoamaTe mm
MICHAEL ANDREW MONROE aaeaeeny =
Winte in, if any cen]

AT-LARGE
MEMBER OF THE COUNCIL

VOTE FOR NO MORE THAN TWO 1)
CAROL SCHWARTZ nervaucan Gamm
LAURENT ROSS ey
KWAME R. BROWN acunten
A.D. “TONY” DOMINGUEZ ere on
Write In, F any (=
Write in, # any om

Sample Ballot

Ward 6

OFFICIAL BALLOT
GENERAL ELECTION

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
NOVEMBER 2, 2004

TO VOTE: Use the No. 2 Pencil to
connect the broken arrow pointing
te your choice, like this:

g>

ou

OFFICIAL BALLOT
GENERAL ELECTION

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
NOVEMBER 2, 2004
TO VOTE: Use the No. 2 Pencil to

connect the broken arrow pointing
te your choice, like this

¢g>

<n

For each office, vote only for the
number of candidates indicated.

(DO NOT USE RED INK)

TO VOTE: Use the No. 2 Pencil to
connect the broken arrow pointing
to your choice, like this:

¢g>

Go,

For each office, vote only for the
number of candidates indicated.

{DO NOT USE RED INK}

10

¢>

UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE
VOTE FOR NO MORE THAN ONE (1)
RAY BROWNE cewoceeTc Gama

ADAM EIDINGER ° faces ants Qua
Wirite in, if any =a

ADVISORY NEIGHBORHOOD

COMMISSIONER XXXX
VOTE FOR NO MORE THAN ONE (1)

Write in, 3 any
Exhibit 99.2









Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Management of Protective Life Insurance Company and The Bank of New York, as Indenture Trustee of Protective
Life Secured Trust 2004-26, (collectively the "Management")
and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee of Protective Life Secured Trust 2004-26 (the "Trust"):

We have examined Management's assertion, included in the accompanying "Management Assertion Regarding the Collection and Distribution of Trust Money by The Bank of New York (Indenture Trustee)," that the collection of payments on the funding agreements and distribution of payments to the noteholders has occurred as required by Section 5.02 of the Indenture agreement dated November 7, 2003 between the Trust and the Indenture Trustee during the year ended December 31, 2004.  Management is responsible for the assertion.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting management's assertion and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, Management's assertion referred to above is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria defined in the accompanying "Management Assertion Regarding the Collection and Distribution of Trust Money by The Bank of New York (Indenture Trustee)."



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Birmingham, AlabamaMarch 30, 2005











Management Assertion Regarding the Collection and Distribution of Trust
Money by The Bank of New York (Indenture Trustee)





Management of the Trust asserts that it has collected payments on the funding agreements and distributed payments to the noteholders as required by Section 5.02 of the Indenture agreement dated November 7, 2003 between the Trust and the Indenture Trustee for the year ended December 31, 2004.  This assertion is based on the following criteria:

1. The payments made by Protective Life on the funding agreements that secured the Notes, for the year ended December 31, 2004, are included in Protective Life's Secured Trusts P & I Payments: 1/1/04 through 12/31/04 (P & I Payments report).
2. The payments made by Protective Life on the funding agreements that secured the Notes, for the year ended December 31, 2004, are included in the Indenture Trustee's History of Transactions List.
3. The amounts due on the Notes are reported as a component of the charges from Cede & Co., the nominee of the Depository Trust Company, on the Indenture Trustee's Payment Obligation Report System (PORS Report).
4. Charges from Cede & Co. are included in the Indenture Trustee's screen prints titled The Depository Trust Company Activity History Details, which represent the charge confirmations to Cede & Co., the nominee of the Depository Trust Company.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John A. Flanagan, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the MacroShares $100 Oil Down Trust;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) and have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The other  certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors, the Board of Managers of MACRO Securities Depositor, LLC, and the audit committee of MacroMarkets, LLC (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  June 29, 2009

| |                                         
| | ----------------------------------------
| | /s/ JOHN A. FLANAGAN                    
| | John A. Flanagan                        
| | Chief Financial Officer of Depositor, on
| | behalf of Registrant
9960.

#### Reeves *v.*The State.

Decided November 7, 1918.

Accusation of possession of intoxicating liquor; from city court of Floyd county—Judge Nunnally. June 27, 1918.

From the evidence it appeared that the defendant lived and farmed on a part of a 160-aere tract of land owned by his father, on which, besides the house in which he resided, was a vacant house formerly occupied by him, and that several jugs, two of them containing about live gallons of whisky, were found in the vacant house by officers searching it about two months after he had moved out of it. The two houses were about 300 yards apart, and there was no path leading directly from one of them to the other. A distillery in a slough among trees and bushes was discovered by the officers on another part of the same tract of land, about 150 yards from where the defendant lived. The furnace, of the distillery was still warm, and, from appearances there, it seemed that “only one or two runs had been made.” There was a high hill between the defendant’s residence and the distillery, and the distillery could not be seen from the house. There was no direct path from the house to the distillery. In a closet of the defendant’s house an officer found a piece of copper pipe about three feet long, of the same size and kind as the pipe used in the distillery. Two barrels of beer were found in bushes near the distillery after the defendant had been arrested and put in jail. In his statement at the trial he said that the piece of pipe found in his house (described by him as iron pipe) was picked up by him in his yard soon after he moved into the house; that he had nothing to do with the distillery and did not know of it, that the land on which it was found was not a part of the land rented by him, and he was not in possession of it; that when he moved out of the house in which the whisky was found he surrendered possession of it and turned over the key; that he left no liquor in it and did not put any in it, and was not guilty of the offense charged. The defendant’s father testified to the same effect as to the land rented *10and in the possession of the defendant, and that when the 'defendant surrendered possession of the house in which the whisky’ was afterwards found, the defendant gave the key to him, and he (the witness) locked the house and took the key to Porterdale with him, and at that time there was no whisky in the house.

*9Harwell, J.

The evidence relied upon by the State to connect the accused with the offense of having in his custody and control intoxicating liquor was wholly circumstantial in character, and did not exclude every reasonable hypoijiesis save that of the guilt of the accused. Accordingly, the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*

*10
      *W. B. Mebane,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. F. Kelly, solicitor,*contra.
Malware Notification and Remediation 

Tools and Techniques 

NIST Workshop: Technical Aspects of Botnet 

Michael Glenn 

May 30, 2012 
Prevention 

Detection 

Notification 

Remediation 

Recovery 

5 Steps to Malware Remediation 

2 

User Education 
Notification and Remediation Techniques 

Method Cost Notify 

Effect 

Remediate 

Effect 

Pros Cons 

Email Low Low – 

Moderate 

Low - 

Moderate 

Cost Easy to spoof 

Account DB 

Telephone 

Call 

Low - 

High 

Moderate Very Low - 

High 

Cost Account DB 

Cost 

Postal Mail High Moderate Low Very Costly 

Remediation 

SMS Low Low - 

Moderate 

Very Low Cost Account DB 

Instant 

Message 

Low Low - 

Moderate 

Low Cost Easy to spoof 

Account DB 

Walled 

Garden 

Low Medium - 

High 

Medium - 

High 

Direct 

Interaction 

Infected Device 

Identification 

Web 

Browser 

Low Medium - 

High 

Low - High Direct 

Interaction 

Easy to Bypass 

3 
CenturyLink Notification & Remediation Program 

Prevention 

• Anti-virus Provided, Broadband Modem Firewall, NAT 

• User Education Materials 

Detection 

• Rely on Trusted Third Party Reports 

• Do Not Monitor Customer Traffic 

Notification 

• Leaky Walled Garden, Port 80 Web Traffic Redirection 

Remediation 

• 5 Step Process with Locally Hosted Tools 

• Special Notifications and Tools by Malware Family 

4 
Consumer Internet Protection Program 

Goals: 

• Automate the notification of customers of AUP violations (today 

malware infected customers) 

• Assist customers in a self help manner to clean their computers 

of the infection 

• Educate users about the dangers of malware and good Internet 

security practices 

System primarily justified through the lowering of tier 1 

support calls. Additional benefits include: 

• Better customer satisfaction with broadband product 

• Lower customer churn 

• Lower SPAM complaints 

• Reduced level of DDoS attacks 

Trial in January 2006, production release August 2006. 
General Philosophy

• Assume majority of infected customers are not malicious, 

merely infected co-victims 

• Treat them with respect 

• Warn them of the risk to their personal information 

• Educate them regarding good security practices 

• Provide them self-help tools 

• Do not lock them into the walled garden 
CenturyLink Botnet Notification & Remediation 

7 
DNS Override 

8 
Policy Based Routing 

9 
Tunneled Traffic 

10 
Michael Glenn – Director Enterprise Security Technology 

Email: Michael.Glenn at CenturyLink.com

11
Exhibit 13.1

eLong, Inc.

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

In connection with the
Annual Report of eLong, Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Henrik Kjellberg, Interim Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company as of December 31, 2006 and results of operations of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006.



/s/ Henrik KjellbergName:

Henrik KjellbergTitle:

Interim Chief Executive OfficerDate:

June 29, 2007
#### Wilma F. HOOG, Claimant-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-7053.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: Oct. 25, 2004.

ORDER

Pursuant to the Court’s letter dated September 27, 2004,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

This appeal is dismissed.
# Scope

# Characteristics

# Voting Process

# Requirements
Order entered July 2, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00529-CR

JASON MICHAEL SWARM, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-80775-2017

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal.

We abated the appeal for appointment of counsel. On June 19, 2019, we received a copy 

of the amended appeal schedule noting that counsel had been appointed. We DIRECT the 

Clerk of the Court to list Kara Fitts appointed counsel for appellant. 

Before the Court is court reporter Robyn Rodriguez’s May 29, 2019 request for 

additional time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request and ORDER the reporter’s 

record filed within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. 

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit
32.1











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of CompX International Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) I, David A. Bowers, Vice
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and I, Darryl R.
Halbert, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Controller of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ David A.
Bowers


David A.
Bowers


Vice
Chairman of the Board, President


and
Chief Executive Officer

















/s/ Darryl R.
Halbert


Darryl R.
Halbert


Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer


and
Controller











August 1,
2008











Note:  The
certification the registrant furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed “filed” for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or
otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  Registration
Statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference, except as otherwise expressly
stated in such filing.