alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 1, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001049537
<NAME> GE FINANCIAL ASSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            39,513
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                         314
<MORTGAGE>                                       8,222
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  60,513
<CASH>                                           2,353
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               1,384
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           2,625
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,400
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 60,086
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                814
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   2,043
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                              613
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                    703
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,322
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    86,400
<PREMIUMS>                                       1,229
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                854
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                  21
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     266
<BENEFITS>                                       1,336
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                        198
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                               (6)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    255
<INCOME-TAX>                                        94
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                160
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       160
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
#### Hoagland *v.*Rogers, in Error.

AN action of debt may be brought in this state, upon the judgment of a justice of the peace in another state.; but a *scire facias*to procure the award of an execution bn such a judgment does not lie. ■ .
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

OAKLEY, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND 

UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS 

IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 20-cv-04402 

Judge Mary M. Rowland 

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cummings 

DECLARATION OF SERVICE 

I, Thomas J. Juettner, of the City of Chicago, in the State of Illinois, declare as follows: 

1. I am an attorney at law, duly admitted to practice before the Courts of the State of Illinois 

and the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. I am one of the 

attorneys for Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. (“Plaintiff”). Except as otherwise expressly stated to 

the contrary, I have personal knowledge of the following facts and, if called as a witness, I 

could and would competently testify as follows: 

2. On July 31, 2020, this Court entered an Order [24] permitting Plaintiff to complete service 

of process to Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f)(3) by 

electronically publishing a link to the Complaint, TRO and relevant documents on a 

website and by sending an e-mail to the e-mail addresses identified in Exhibit 2 to the 

Declaration of Jason Groppe and any email addresses provided for Defendants by third 

parties that includes a link to said website. 

3. I hereby certify that on August 24, 2020, I electronically published the Complaint, TRO, 

Summons and other relevant documents on a website. 

Case: 1:20-cv-04402 Document #: 32-1 Filed: 08/24/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:1782
2

4. I hereby certify that on August 24, 2020, I sent an e-mail to the e-mail addresses identified 

in Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Jason Groppe and any e-mail addresses provided for 

Defendants by third parties that includes a link to said website. 

5. The completed Return of Service form is attached hereto. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed this 24th day of August 2020, at Chicago, Illinois. 

 /s/ Thomas J. Juettner 

 Thomas J. Juettner 

 GREER, BURNS & CRAIN, LTD. 

 300 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 2500 

 Chicago, Illinois 60606 

 Telephone: 312-360-0080 

 tjjuettner@gbc.law 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

Oakley, Inc. 

Case: 1:20-cv-04402 Document #: 32-1 Filed: 08/24/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:1783
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 50067 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

OMAR MERAZ

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:14

- CR

- 568

- 5

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Omar Meraz has moved for leave to

withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Meraz has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relev ant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Meraz ’ s response . We concur
with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 17, 2016
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-50067 Document: 00513384577 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016No. 15

- 50067

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-50067 Document: 00513384577 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
9278.

#### Mattox *v.*Board of Education of Liberty County.

Decided January 14, 1919.

Complaint; from Liberty superior court—Judge Sheppard. September 19, 1917.

*H. H. Elders,*for plaintiff.

*W. B. Stubbs, Parker & Parker,*for defendant.

Jenkins, J.

In accordance with the answers, made by the Supreme Court to the questions certified to it in this ease (148 *Ga.*577, 97 S. E. 532), the ruling of the court below, sustaining the demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition, is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.*
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 15.1

August 4, 2004



Vornado Operating Company
210 Route 4 East
Paramus, New Jersey

We have made a review, in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial
information of Vornado Operating Company and subsidiaries (the "Company") for
the period ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, as indicated in our report dated August
4, 2004, (which report includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern); because we did not perform an audit, we
expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-68458 on Form S-8
and Registration Statement No. 333-77143 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
EXHIBIT
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. §** **1350)**


I,
        John
        T. McLaughlin, of US Dataworks, Inc. certify pursuant to section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
  (i)  the
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”),
        which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of
        section
        13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
  (ii)  the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of US Dataworks,
        Inc.
  Dated:
        August 28, 2008
  /s/
                  John T. McLaughlinJohn
                  T. McLaughlinChief
                  Financial Officer
#### KLUTTZ v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.

No. 279P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 224

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 23 July 1997.
ILND 450 (Rev. 04/29/2016) Judgment in a Civil Action

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

Pension Fund of Cement Masons' Union Local 

Union No. 502, et al. , 

Plaintiff(s), 

v. 

Global Concrete Corp. , 

Defendant(s). 

Case No. 20cv4213 

Judge Cummings 

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE 

Judgment is hereby entered (check appropriate box): 

in favor of plaintiff(s) 

and against defendant(s) 

in the amount of $ , 

which includes pre–judgment interest. 

 does not include pre–judgment interest. 

Post-judgment interest accrues on that amount at the rate provided by law from the date of this judgment. 

Plaintiff(s) shall recover costs from defendant(s). 

in favor of defendant(s) 

and against plaintiff(s) 

.

 Defendant(s) shall recover costs from plaintiff(s). 

other: Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiffs PENSION FUND OF CEMENT 

MASONS’ UNION LOCAL UNION NO. 502, et al., and against Defendant GLOBAL CONCRETE CORP. in 

the amount of $45,000.00. 

Plaintiffs are entitled to post-judgment interest at a rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of the entry of the 

Judgment until payment of the principal is received in full. 

This action was (check one): 

 tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. 

 tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision was reached. 

decided by Judge Cummings 

Case: 1:20-cv-04213 Document #: 61 Filed: 05/25/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:338
Date: 5/25/2021 Thomas G. Bruton, Clerk of Court 

 C. Chambers , Deputy Clerk 

Case: 1:20-cv-04213 Document #: 61 Filed: 05/25/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:339
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined t hat

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 97-50792

__________________
ALEXIS HERMAN, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BARRY TAYLOR, doing business as BST Enterprises/Junior Careers, ET Al.,
Defendants, FRANCISCO GARCIA LEON, also known as Frank Garcia, doing business as BST Enterprises/Junior Careers, doing business as GABE Enterprises/ Junior Careers, Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

(SA-95-CV-207)

______________________________________________

October 7, 1998 Before JOLLY, BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6.
Exhibit 13.1



Certification



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of LG.Philips LCD Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the
Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of the Company.



Dated: April 11, 2005



/s/ Bon Joon KooBon Joon KooChief Executive Officer andJoint Representative Director




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to LG.Philips LCD Co., Ltd. and will be retained by LG.Philips LCD Co., Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Nicholas Eric TURNER, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-7342.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 24, 2004.

Decided: Dec. 7, 2004.

Nicholas Eric Turner, Appellant pro se.

Angela Hewlett Miller, Office of the United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Nicholas Eric Turner seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) in which he claimed ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to file a direct appeal. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss this appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See United States v. Turner,*No. CR-02-79 (M.D.N.C. May 28, 2004).

Turner asserted two additional claims for the first time in his appeal to this court: (1) he does not meet the enhancement requirements necessary to be labeled an armed criminal under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1) (2000); and (2) an amendment to the United States Sentencing Guidelines changed the rules allowing enhancements under 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g), 924(c) (2000). Because neither claim was raised in the district court, Turner may not raise them now on appeal. *See Muth v. United States, 1*F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss as to those claims as well.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Handbook 44 - 2008

Committee on Specifications and Tolerances 

of the 92nd Conference

Michael Sikula, NY 

Carol Fulmer, SC 

Todd R. Lucas, OH 

Bret Saum, CA 

Kristin Macey, CO 

Ted Kingsbury, Canada, Technical Advisor 

Steve Cook, Juana Williams, and Richard Suiter, NIST, Technical Advisors 

Past Chairmen of the Committee

Conference Chairman Conference Chairman

8-11 L.A. Fischer, NBS 68 L.H. DeGrange, MD 

12-28 F.S. Holbrook, NBS 69 S.A. Colbrook, IL 

29-38 J.P. McBride, MA 70 D.A. Guensler, CA 

39-42 R.E. Meek, IN 71-72 F. Gerk, NM 

43-44 J.E. Brenton, CA 73 K. Butcher, MD 

45-47 C.L. Jackson, WI 74 R. Andersen, NY 

48 T.C. Harris, VA 75 D. Watson, TX 

49-50 R.E. Meek, IN 76 J. Truex, OH 

51-52 G.L. Johnson, KY 77-78 C. Carroll, MA 

53 H.D. Robinson, ME 79 J. Jeffries, FL 

54-55 R. Rebuffo, NE 80 R. Suiter, NE 

56-57 D.E. Konsoer, WI 81 G. West, NM 

58 J.C. Mays, FL 82-83 R. Murdock, NC 

59 T.F. Brink, VT 84 D. Brown, IA 

60 W.S. Watson, CA 85 M. Hopper, CA 

61 K.J. Simila, OR 86 G. Shefcheck, OR 

62 W.E. Czaia, MN 87 M. Coyne, MA 

63 M.L. Kinlaw, NC 88 R. Wotthlie, MD 

64 J.A. Bird, NJ 89 C. VanBuren, MI 

65 D.A. Guensler, CA 90 J. Kane, MT 

66 G.A. Delano, MT 91 C. Cooney, OR 

67 F.C. Nagele, MI 

iv
Exhibit 11.1

Computation of Earnings Per Share

     The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the
basic and diluted earnings per share computations for income from continuing
operations:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Income         Shares     Per Share
U.S. dollars in thousands except share and per     (Numerator)  (Denominator)   Amount
share data
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                <C>            <C>             <C>
Three Months Ended March 31, 2000
Basic loss per share
Loss available to common shareholders              $(10,225)      11,575,898      $(0.89)

Effect of Dilutive Securities:
     Class A Warrants                                                     --
     Director and Employee Options                                        --
     Class B Warrants                                                     --

Diluted loss per share                             --------------------------------------
Loss available to common shareholders              $(10,225)      11,575,898      $(0.89)
                                                   ======================================
Three Months Ended March 31, 1999
Basic earnings per share
Income available to common shareholders              $3,991       13,923,799      $0.29

Effect of Dilutive Securities:
     Class A Warrants                                                     --
     Director and Employee Options                                     9,748
     Class B Warrants                                                     --
                                                   --------------------------------------
Diluted earnings per share
Income available to common shareholders              $3,991       13,933,547      $0.29
                                                   ======================================
</TABLE>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-23-00124-CV

JEANNIE BURTON,

Appellant

v.

ANTONIO ASCENSIO UGARTE,

Appellee

From the 443rd District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 101,521

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Jeannie Burton filed a pro se notice of appeal in this matter on April 26, 

2023. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1 provides that a notice of appeal must be 

filed within thirty days after the judgment is signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. The final 

judgment in this case was signed by the trial court on September 2, 2022. Because the 

notice of appeal was filed more than thirty days after the trial court’s September 2, 2022 

judgment was signed, the notice of appeal is untimely.
Burton v. Ugarte Page 2

By letter dated June 1, 2023, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that this 

appeal was subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction because it appeared that her notice 

of appeal was untimely. The Clerk of the Court notified Appellant that the Court may 

dismiss the appeal unless, within ten days of the date of the letter, Appellant showed

grounds for continuing the appeal. Appellant has not done so. 

Because our jurisdiction depends on a timely notice of appeal and because 

Appellant’s notice of appeal is untimely, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. 

See id. R. 42.3(a); Howlett v. Tarrant Cnty., 301 S.W.3d 840, 843 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 

2009, pet. denied) (“A timely-filed notice of appeal confers jurisdiction on this court, and 

absent a timely filed notice of appeal, we must dismiss the appeal.” (citing Verburgt v. 

Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997))).

MATT JOHNSON

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and

Justice Smith

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed June 28, 2023

[CV06]
Exhibit No. 31.1

CERTIFICATION UNDER RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT

OF 1934 FOR CABCO SERIES 2004-101 TRUST (GOLDMAN SACHS CAPITAL I)

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2016

I, Lee Thompson,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports
filed in respect of the periods included in the year covered by this annual report, filed by Corporate Asset Backed Corporation, on behalf of CABCO Series 2004-101 Trust (Goldman Sachs Capital I);

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling
and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the
activities performed by the depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the
depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies
relating to the compliance by the trustee and the depositor with the minimum servicing standards or similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, as trustee.

Date: March 30, 2017



By:

/s/ Lee ThompsonName:

Lee ThompsonTitle:

Vice PresidentCorporate Asset Backed Corporation
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0622 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. LLOYD MORTIER BARRUS,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Vickie L. Pratt is granted an extension of time to and including April 24, 202 3 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 10 2023

02/10/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0662