alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
10495.

#### Huckary *v.*The State.

Decided June 13, 1919.

Rehearins Denied June 19, 1919.

Indictment for adultery and fornication; from Cobb superior court—Judge Morris. 'April 5, 1919.'

*Herbert Clay,*for plaintiff in error.

*John T. Dorsey, solicitor-general, William Butt,*contra.

Broyles, P. J.

1. Under repeated.rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, where a portion of an excerpt from the charge of the court, complained of, is not erroneous, and the exception is to the entire excerpt (the erroneous portion not being pointed out), the exception is too broad and will not be considered by the reviewing court. In this case the excerpt complained of dealt with the subjects of admissions and confessions, and exception was taken to the entire excerpt. The. portion of the charge on admissions was authorized by the facts of the ease and was not error for any reason assigned. Under the foregoing ruling the exception to the entire excerpt' was too broad and. will not be considered.

2. The other special grounds of the motion for a new trial are without merit:

3. The evidence as to the venue of the crime, while circumstantial and not altogether satisfactory, authorized a finding in favor' of the State upon this issue.

4. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and, having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

' *Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit 1 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 414-1 Filed: 09/03/21 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:10222
(12) United States Design Patent (10) Patent No.: 

USOOD73.9906S 

US D739,906S 

Chen (45) Date of Patent: Sep. 29, 2015 

(54) TWO-WHEELED VEHICLE D552,201 S * 10/2007 Kwak .......................... D21,765 

D567,883 S * 4/2008 Ota .............................. D21,421 

D572,332 S * 7/2008 Sramek et al. ............... D21,765 (71) Applicant: Shane Chen, Camas, WA (US) D607,525 S * 1/2010 Marciano ..................... D21,769 

(72) Inventor: Shane Chen, Camas, WA (US) * cited by examiner 

(**) Term: 14 Years Primary Examiner — Cynthia M Chin 

(22) Filed: Mar 12, 2013 The ornamental design for a two-wheeled vehicle, as shown 

and described. 

(51) LOC (10) Cl. ................................................ 21-02 

(52) U.S. Cl. DESCRIPTION 

USPC ......................................................... D21A760 

(58) Field of Classification Search FIG. 1 is a top view of the two-wheeled vehicle. 

USPC ........ D21/419, 421, 423,426, 760, 765, 766, FIG. 2 is a front elevation view of the vehicle of FIG. 1; the 

D21/769, 771, 776, 803: D12/1; 280/7.14, rear elevation views being identical thereto. 

280/11.14, 11.16, 11.19, 11.115, 11.226, FIG. 3 is a bottom view of the vehicle of FIG. 1. 

280/11.233, 11.25, 11.27, 11.28, 14.21, FIG. 4 is a perspective view of the vehicle of FIG. 1; and, 

280/87.01, 87.021, 87.03, 87.041, 87.042, FIG. 5 is a side view of the vehicle of FIG. 1; the opposite side 

280/809,811: 180/180, 181 view being identical thereto. 

See application file for complete search history. The broken lines represent functional components which are 

provided for context and do not form a part of the claimed 

(56) References Cited design. In FIGS. 1-4, the single broken line in the middle of 

the vehicle represents a joint whereby the right and left halves 

U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS of the vehicle may twist relative to each other as part of the 

D437.377 S * 2/2001 Fisher .......................... D21765 vehicle's function. 

D465,003 S * 10/2002 Ohrvallet al. ... D21,763 

D535,714 S * 1/2007 Cheng et al. ................. D21,763 1 Claim, 3 Drawing Sheets 

e rat a 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 414-1 Filed: 09/03/21 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:10223
U.S. Patent Sep. 29, 2015 Sheet 1 of 3 US D739,906S 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 414-1 Filed: 09/03/21 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:10224
U.S. Patent Sep. 29, 2015 Sheet 2 of 3 US D739,906S 

Fig. 3 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 414-1 Filed: 09/03/21 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:10225
U.S. Patent Sep. 29, 2015 Sheet 3 of 3 US D739,906S 

Fig. 3 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 414-1 Filed: 09/03/21 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:10226
The NIST NICE Regional Alliances for Multistakeholder Partnerships Program (RAMPS) is an excellent 

model for regional coordination of community stakeholders in cybersecurity, including leadership from 

academia, industry, government, and the military. 

The Philadelphia Cybersecurity Education Alliance (PCEA) is a recently formed organization aimed at 

precisely this type of coordination in the Philadelphia area. I serve as the Academic Sector Chief in the 

PCEA.

The RAMPS program is precisely the right kind of stimulus to provide important financial support for 

these types of regional initiatives.

We respectfully recommend the renewed funding of the NIST-NICE RAMPS program.

Steven Weber

Professor and Interim Department Head - Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Director -

Isaac L. Auerbach Cybersecurity Institute Drexel University www.ece.drexel.edu/weber
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

George Moore

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04801

Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo

Auto Care Warranty Solutions, LLC

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, June 28, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: This case is hereby

dismissed for want of prosecution. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (mgh, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04801 Document #: 15 Filed: 06/28/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:33
CRYOGENIC HELIUM 

REFRIGERATOR DISPLAY

Ryan Fangmeyer

Mentor: Michael Middleton
BACKGROUND

 The NIST Center for Neutron Research (NCNR) operates a facility 

for biology, chemistry, physics, and materials research using a 

continuous neutron source

 In order to compensate for flux loss, the NCNR is constructing a 

deuterium cryostat

 The Cold Source will soon use a new 

high powered refrigerator
OVERVIEW AND IMPORTANCE

 The new high powered refrigerator for the new deuterium 

cryostat in C200 needs a screen display of the instruments

 An intuitive display provides insight into the inner workings of the 

system, and improves troubleshooting response times

 Remote operability allows us to reduce radiation dosage

 The display is a Human Machine Interface that allows for remote 

control and viewing of the refrigerator
CAD MODEL

 A CAD model was created in Creo Elements 

 Represents a near accurate view of the refrigerator

 Flow paths are illustrative and colored

 The cross section of the completed model was taken through a 

clipping workplane
CONVERTING TO DISPLAY

 The cross section was converted to a high resolution print tiff file 

and then to a bitmap file

 The bitmap image was placed in Factory Talk Viewer as a 

wallpaper
CREATING THE DISPLAY

 Name plate for each instrument is added

 A numerical value attached to a tag is added

 Flow descriptions are added 

 Closed states(red valves) are added to each 

valve line 

TAGS

 Each instrument has live data values from the reactor

 Each parameter has a unique identifier, or “address”

FUTURE WORK

The display is editable and will change 

 New screens will always be added along with the current to 

support the ongoing cold source project

The tag database will have continuous updates

 New tags are able to be referenced for the current display or any 

future display 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

 Many thanks to Julie Borchers, Yamali Hernandez, Mike 

Middleton, NCNR staff, and SHIP staff
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7232

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CORDELL CHOW,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-96-89, CA-98-250-BO)

Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 29, 1998

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cordell Chow, Appellant Pro Se. Fenita Morris Shepard, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Chow, Nos. CR-96-89; CA-98-250-BO (E.D.N.C.

July 21, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 13.7**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Inmarsat Ventures Limited (the “Company”)for the annual period ended December 31, 2005 (the “Periodic Report”), I, Andrew Sukawaty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Date: April 28, 2006
first security 10qsb 93005 exhibit 10-5


    Exhibit
      10.5

     

    Summary
      of Outside Director Compensation Plan

    


    On
      September 12, 2005, the Boards of Directors of First Security Bancorp, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) and First Security Bank of Lexington, Inc. (the “Bank”) approved
      establishing a compensation plan for directors of the Company and the Bank
      who
      are not employees of either the Company or the Bank. This compensation plan
      provides for the payment to each outside director of a one-time $3,500 stipend
      plus a per meeting fee for meetings held after July 1, 2005 per the following
      schedule:

    


    
      	·  	
              Board
                of Director meetings - $550 fee per meeting or $750 per meeting in
                the
                case of an outside director serving as Chairman of the
                Board

            


    

    


    
      	·  	
              Nomination,
                Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors
                of the Company - $200 fee per committee meeting or $500 in the case
                of the
                Chairman of such committee

            


    

    


    
      	·  	
              Audit
                Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company or of the Bank
                - $200
                fee per committee meeting or $500 in the case of the Chairman of
                such
                committee

            


    

    


    
      	·  	
              Asset
                Liability Management/Investment Committee of the Board of Directors
                of the
                Bank - $200 fee per committee meeting or $500 in the case of the
                Chairman
                of such committee

            


    

    


    
      	·  	
              Director
                Loan Committee of the Board of Directors of the Bank - $100 fee per
                committee meeting

            


    

    


    Under
      the
      compensation plan, an outside director, other than when serving as Chairman
      of
      the Board or as Chairman of a Committee, must be present at the meeting (in
      person or by teleconference) to receive a fee if the director has missed two
      or
      more meetings during the prior twelve month period. Outside directors serving
      on
      the Board of Directors of both the Bank and the Company who attend a joint,
      concurrent or consecutive meeting of both Boards, or of the same committee
      of
      both Boards, or any combination of same, would be paid for attending such
      meetings as if they only attended one Board or committee meeting. Fees would
      be
      paid promptly as they accrue.
EXHIBIT 3

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 472-3 Filed: 10/29/21 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:12878
Document title: 平衡车_自平衡车_卡丁车-滑板车-悬浮鞋【疆游gyroor官网】

Capture URL: http://gyroor.cn/about/

Capture timestamp (UTC): Wed, 27 Oct 2021 21:01:02 GMT Page 1 of 5

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 472-3 Filed: 10/29/21 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:12879
Document title: 平衡车_自平衡车_卡丁车-滑板车-悬浮鞋【疆游gyroor官网】

Capture URL: http://gyroor.cn/about/

Capture timestamp (UTC): Wed, 27 Oct 2021 21:01:02 GMT Page 2 of 5

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 472-3 Filed: 10/29/21 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:12880
Document title: 平衡车_自平衡车_卡丁车-滑板车-悬浮鞋【疆游gyroor官网】

Capture URL: http://gyroor.cn/about/

Capture timestamp (UTC): Wed, 27 Oct 2021 21:01:02 GMT Page 3 of 5

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 472-3 Filed: 10/29/21 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:12881
Document title: 平衡车_自平衡车_卡丁车-滑板车-悬浮鞋【疆游gyroor官网】

Capture URL: http://gyroor.cn/about/

Capture timestamp (UTC): Wed, 27 Oct 2021 21:01:02 GMT Page 4 of 5

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 472-3 Filed: 10/29/21 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:12882
Document title: 平衡车_自平衡车_卡丁车-滑板车-悬浮鞋【疆游gyroor官网】

Capture URL: http://gyroor.cn/about/

Capture timestamp (UTC): Wed, 27 Oct 2021 21:01:02 GMT Page 5 of 5

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 472-3 Filed: 10/29/21 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:12883
Case: 1:20-cv-03970 Document #: 1-5 Filed: 07/07/20 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:137

Case: 1:20-cv-03970 Document #: 1-5 Filed: 07/07/20 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:138

Case: 1:20-cv-03970 Document #: 1-5 Filed: 07/07/20 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:139

Case: 1:20-cv-03970 Document #: 1-5 Filed: 07/07/20 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:140
9763.

9764.

#### Atlantic Paper & Pulp Corporation *v.*Johnson. Atlantic Paper & Pulp Corporation *v.*Owens.

Decided January 15, 1919.

Rehearing denied January 28, 1919.

Description and counsel’s names as in case next preceding..

Luke, J.

Each of these cases is controlled! by the decision this day rendered in *Atlantic Paper*& *Pulp Corporation*v. *Bowen,*ante, 249. The court erred in overruling the general demurrer.
Exhibit 10.68


 


GUESS?,
INC.


 


WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION OF PERFORMANCE-BASED BONUS CRITERIA

FOR PAUL MARCIANO


 


On September 27, 2005, the following cash
bonus awards were authorized by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors of Guess?, Inc. (the “Company”) to be paid to Paul Marciano,
Co-Chairman of the Board and Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, under
the Company’s 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”) if the
specified levels of earnings from operations for the Company’s licensing
segment with respect to the fourth quarter of 2005 and the 2006, 2007 and 2008
calendar years are achieved:


 


	
  Performance Period

  	
   

  	
  Incentive
  Compensation Award

  
	
  Fourth
  Quarter 2005

  	
   

  	
  $3.0
  million (payable only upon certification of achievement of performance
  standard for fourth quarter 2005)

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  2006
  Calendar Year

  	
   

  	
  $1.3
  million (payable only upon certification of achievement of performance
  standard for 2006 calendar year)

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  2007
  Calendar Year

  	
   

  	
  $1.5
  million (payable only upon certification of achievement of performance
  standard for 2007 calendar year)

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  2008
  Calendar Year

  	
   

  	
  $3.5
  million (payable only upon certification of (i) achievement of performance
  standard for 2008 calendar year and (ii) receipt by the Company of the $35.0
  million payment due in January 2012 pursuant to the license agreement with
  the Company’s watch licensee)

  



 


All such potential awards are intended to
qualify as performance-based compensation within the meaning of Internal
Revenue Code Section 162(m).  Such
potential awards are in addition to any other performance-based awards for
which Paul Marciano is eligible under the Incentive Plan, the Company’s Annual
Incentive Bonus Plan or otherwise.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS COMPANY DOES NOT FILE A CLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET, THEREFORE THESE ARE NOT
PROVIDED. 5-02(9), 5-02(21)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,974
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,147
<ALLOWANCES>                                       351
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         982,642
<DEPRECIATION>                                 145,680
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 868,481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        348,952
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           292
<OTHER-SE>                                     450,356
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   868,481
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                84,598
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,287
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,349
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   339
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,677
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,350
<INCOME-TAX>                                       155
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,195
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,195
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41


</TABLE>
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Luis Alberto Sigala

, * From the County Court at Law

No. 2 of Midland County,

Trial Court No. 133,572

.

Vs. No. 11

- 11

- 00 357

- CR * February 21, 2013

State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson , J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no error in

the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the judgment of the

tria l court is in all things affirmed.
Exhibit 13.1
 eLong, Inc.
 CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Company Report
 (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition of the Company as of December 31, 2008 and results of operations of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2008.
 /s/ Guangfu Cui

Name: Guangfu CuiTitle: Chief Executive OfficerDate: June 17, 2009
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel are you 

a

 Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this &ourt an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this &ourt’s

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 8.6.&§1746, this

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

In Re: TIKTOK, Inc., a

Consumer Privacy Litigation

20-cv-04699

Plaintiff A.J., through her guardian Aaron Johnson

Julia Q. Peng

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy LLP

840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200

Burlingame, CA 94010

CA Bar No. 318396 650-697-6000

jpeng@cpmlegal.com

September 10, 2020

✔

✔

✔

✔

Julia Q. Peng

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 61 Filed: 09/10/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1555
EXHIBIT 10.24



 Exhibit 10.24 
  
 CERTIFICATE OF TRUST 
 OF 
 ACAS BUSINESS LOAN TRUST 2005-1 
  
 THIS Certificate of Trust of ACAS Business Loan Trust 2005-1 (the
“Trust”) is being duly executed and filed on behalf of the Trust by the undersigned, as trustee, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. § 3801 et seq.) (the “Act”).

  
 1. Name. The name of the statutory trust formed by this
Certificate of Trust is ACAS Business Loan Trust 2005-1. 
  
 2.
Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust in the State of Delaware are Wachovia Bank of Delaware, National Association, 300 Delaware Avenue, 9th Floor, Wilmington, Delaware 19801. 
  
 3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon filing. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1)
of the Act. 
  

			
	WACHOVIA BANK OF DELAWARE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, not in its individual capacity but solely as Trustee of the Trust
		
	 By:
	 	/s/    STEVEN A. FINKLEA        
	 Name:
	 	Steven A. Finklea, CCTS
	 Title:
	 	Vice President