alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                         EARNINGS PER SHARE COMPUTATIONS
                      (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         THREE MONTH PERIOD           SIX MONTH PERIOD
                                                           ENDED JUNE 30,              ENDED JUNE 30,
                                                       ---------------------       ---------------------
                                                         1999          1998          1999          1998
                                                         ----          ----          ----          ----

<S>                                                    <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
EARNINGS PER COMMON AND DILUTIVE
    POTENTIAL SHARE:
    Net Income                                         $ 8,124       $ 6,961       $16,874       $14,625
                                                       =======       =======       =======       =======
    Shares:
    Weighted average number of common
       shares outstanding - Basic                       26,683        26,515        26,632        26,012
    Effect of dilutive securities (a):
       Stock options                                       337           688           321           732
                                                       -------       -------       -------       -------
           Adjusted common shares - Diluted             27,020        27,203        26,953        26,744
                                                       =======       =======       =======       =======

EARNINGS PER SHARE - DILUTED                           $  0.30       $  0.26       $  0.63       $  0.55
                                                       =======       =======       =======       =======
</TABLE>


(a)      Shares issuable were derived using the "Treasury Stock Method" for all
         dilutive potential shares.
##### 



Citizens Effingham Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
 Exhibit 32.2
  (1)
    
    To the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
the Company.
Exhibit 10.5


    Exhibit
      10.5

    


    DIRECTOR
      COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS

    


    Our
      non-employee directors receive grants of common stock, stock options or
      restricted stock units under our Amended and Restated 2001 Stock Plan to
      compensate them for service on the Board of Directors each year, with the number
      of shares determined as set forth below. Non-employee directors do not receive
      any other compensation, in the form of cash or otherwise, for service on the
      Board of Directors or its committees, other than reimbursement of reasonable
      expenses. Directors who are also employees of the Company do not receive any
      additional compensation for their service on the Board of
      Directors.

    


    Policy
      Regarding Equity Grants to Non-Employee Directors

    


    
      	 	 	
              Fiscal
                2005

            	 	
              Fiscal
                2006

            	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
              Upon
                election to the Board of Directors

            	 	 	
              25,000
                stock options

            	 	 	
              25,000
                stock options

            	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
              Upon
                re-election to the Board of Directors 

              (every
                three years)

            	 	 	
              20,000
                stock options

            	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
              Annually

            	 	 	
              10,000
                shares of common stock

            	 	 	
              10,000
                shares of common stock 

              or
                restricted stock units

            	 


    

    


    All
      awards are granted under our 2001 Stock Plan, as amended and restated on
      September 27, 2005. The
      stock
      options have a term of ten years and vest one-third annually over three
      years,
      with
an
      exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date
      of
      grant. Beginning
      with fiscal 2006, each continuing director may elect at his or her discretion
      to
      receive the annual stock grants in the form of shares of common stock or
      restricted stock units, each of which will be fully vested upon grant.
Issuance
      of shares upon liquidation of stock units will be subject to payment limitations
      under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

     

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        27
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

FITNESS ANYWHERE LLC 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HOTBUY88 STORE, et al. 

Defendants. 

Case No. 20-cv-04916 

Judge John J. Tharp, Jr. 

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey I. Cummings 

SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT 

WHEREAS, a judgment was entered in the above action on October 23, 2020 [46], in 

favor of Plaintiff Fitness Anywhere LLC (“Plaintiff”) and against the Defendants Identified in 

Schedule A in the amount detailed in the chart below (“Judgment Amount”), and Plaintiff 

acknowledges payment of an agreed upon damages amount, costs, and interest and desires to 

release this judgment and hereby fully and completely satisfy the same as to the following 

Defendant: 

Defendant Name Judgment Amount Line No. 

workforcustomer $14,055 61 

THEREFORE, full and complete satisfaction of said judgment as to the above-referenced 

Defendant is hereby acknowledged, and the Clerk of the Court is hereby authorized and directed 

to make an entry of the full and complete satisfaction on the docket of said judgment. 

Case: 1:20-cv-04916 Document #: 52 Filed: 11/13/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:2294
2 

Dated this 13th day of November 2020. Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Jake M. Christensen 

Amy C. Ziegler 

Justin R. Gaudio 

Jake M. Christensen 

Martin F. Trainor 

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. 

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

312.360.0080 

312.360.9315 (facsimile) 

 aziegler@gbc.law 

 jgaudio@gbc.law 

 jchristensen@gbc.law 

 mtrainor@gbc.law 

Counsel for Plaintiff Fitness Anywhere LLC

Case: 1:20-cv-04916 Document #: 52 Filed: 11/13/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:2295
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

SOCORRO J. GRANDA, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No. 1:20-cv-04316 

Honorable Judge Matthew F. Kennelly 

Honorable Magistrate Jeffrey Cole 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

 NOW COMES, SOCORRO J. GRANDA (“Plaintiff’), by and through the undersigned 

counsel, and, in support of his Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice, state as follows: 

 Plaintiff, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), hereby voluntarily 

dismisses his claims against the Defendant, MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., 

without prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney fees. 

Dated: August 18, 2020 

 Respectfully Submitted, 

 /s/ Nathan C. Volheim

 Nathan C. Volheim 

 Counsel for Plaintiff 

 Sulaiman Law Group, Ltd. 

 2500 S. Highland Avenue, Suite 200 

 Lombard, IL 60148 

 Phone (630) 575-8181 x113 

 Fax: (630)575-8188 

 nvolheim@sulaimanlaw.com 

Case: 1:20-cv-04316 Document #: 7 Filed: 08/18/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:23
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that on August 18, 2020, a true and correct copy of the 

above and foregoing document was filed with the Court via CM/ECF and served on all parties 

requested electronic notification. 

/s/ Nathan C. Volheim 

Nathan C. Volheim

Case: 1:20-cv-04316 Document #: 7 Filed: 08/18/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:24
H. Res. 282

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 13, 1997.

Whereas 1997 marks the 30th anniversary of the Association

of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN);

Whereas the emphasis of ASEAN on cooperation and the

nonviolent settlement of disputes has helped to bring

peace between the nations of the region which for decades

had been characterized by instability and conflict;

Whereas the economies of the member nations of ASEAN

have experienced significant economic growth benefiting

the lives of many of their people;

Whereas ASEAN as a group is the 4th largest trading partner of the United States and constitutes a larger market

for United States exports than the People’s Republic of

China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong combined;

Whereas ASEAN has successfully fostered a sense of community among its member nations despite differing interests, including the establishment of the region’s only security forum, the Association of South East Asian Nations Regional Forum (ARF), and the Association of

South East Asian Nations Free Trade Area (AFTA);

Whereas ASEAN has played a pivotal role in international efforts of global and regional concern, including securing

the withdrawal of Vietnamese forces from Cambodia and
2

•HRES 282 EH

diplomatic efforts to foster a political settlement to the

civil war in Cambodia;

Whereas the United States relies on ASEAN as a partner in

fostering regional stability, enhancing prosperity, and

promoting peace; and

Whereas the 30th anniversary of the formation of ASEAN offers an opportunity for the United States and the nations

of ASEAN to renew their commitment to international

cooperation on issues of mutual interest and concern:

Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) congratulates the Association of South East

Asian Nations (ASEAN) and its member nations on the

occasion of its 30th anniversary;

(2) looks forward to a broadening and deepening of

friendship and cooperation with ASEAN in the years

ahead for the benefit of the people of the United States

and the nations of ASEAN;

(3) encourages progress by ASEAN members toward the further development of democracy, respect for

human rights, enhancement of the rule of law, and the

expansion of market economies; and

(4) recognizes the past achievements of ASEAN

and pledges its support to work closely with ASEAN as
3

•HRES 282 EH

both the United States and the nations of ASEAN face

current and future regional and global challenges.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§ 1350)




I,
Randall J. Frapart of US Dataworks, Inc., certify pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(i)      the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the
“Report”), which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




(ii)     the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of US Dataworks, Inc. as of
the dates and for the periods expressed in the report.




Dated:  February
22, 2011




/ s/ Randall J. FrapartRandall
      J. FrapartChief
      Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1997
<CASH>                                           1,762
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   87,667
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,134
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,576
<PP&E>                                          12,289
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,077
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 155,417
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,125
<BONDS>                                        109,519
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           378
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,670
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   155,417
<SALES>                                        272,132
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               272,132
<CGS>                                          244,303
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  244,303
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,991
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,789
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,049
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,466
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,049
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,958)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,375)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

COMMONWEALTH EDISON, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

No. 20 CR 368 

EMERGENCY MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE INSTANTER 

 Movant, Timothy J. Hufman, through The Peacock Law Group and Joseph A. 

Stewart, asks this court to allow movant to file the attached motion instanter and 

further to grant the injunctive relief set forth in paragraphs 48 through 57 of the 

attached motion. For the reasons set forth therein, movant will lose significant 

procedural rights if the court does not immediately bar the criminal defendant from 

sending the payment for fine to the government, as the Deferred Prosecution 

Agreement anticipates, and instead order the defendant to post the funds in the 

clerk of the court’s registry account. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

TIMOTHY J. HUFMAN, Movant 

THE PEACOCK LAW GROUP 

 On behalf of Movant, 

By: s/ Joseph A. Stewart 

 JOSEPH A. STEWART 

Principal Attorney 

150 North Michigan Avenue 

Chicago, Illinois 60601 

(312) 741-1070 

joseph.stewart@thepeacocklawgroup.com

Case: 1:20-cr-00368 Document #: 14 Filed: 08/13/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:164
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AYODELE AKINOLA,

Plaintiff

- Appel lant,

v. DAVID SEVERNS; MIKE PREMO,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 15

- 16066

D.C. No. 3:14

- cv
- 00222

- HDM

WGC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Howard D. McKibben, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 8 , 2017 **

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS , Circuit Judges.
Ayodele Akinola appeals from the district court’s March 26 , 2015 order
dismissing his First Amendment retaliation claim in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action
alleging rac e discrimination in his employment with the State of Nevada’s
Department of Transportation

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 23 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 16066

review de novo a dismissal under F ed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Lacey v. Maricopa
County , 693 F.3d 896, 911 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc). We reverse and remand.

The district court dismissed Akinola’s retaliation claim because it did not

involve a matter of public concern. However, t aking the factual allegations as true,

Akinola alleged facts suffic ient to show that his complaints about race

discrimination , which were directed to a personnel manager and set forth in his

earlier lawsuit , involved a matter of public concern

. See Turner v. City & County
of San Francisco , 788 F.3d 1206, 1210 (9th Cir. 2015) ( stating the elements of a
First Amendment retaliation claim) ; Alpha Energy Savers, Inc. v. Hansen , 381
F.3d 917, 926 (9th Cir. 2004) (declining to adopt view that a “run of the mine
single

- plaintiff discrimination case” does not meet the public concern test). We

reverse and remand for further proceedings on the retaliation claim only.
We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctl y raised and argued
in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).
We deny Defendants

- Appellees’ motion to take judicial notice (Docket
Entry No. 24) as unnecessary.

REVERSED and REMANDED

.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF


PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


(SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)






| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
    as amended; and                                                                         
|
| | (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of Odimo Incorporated at the dates and for
    the periods indicated.



|                     |  |                                                                                                   
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 26, 2006 |  | /s/ Alan LiptonAlan Lipton, President and Chief Executive
    Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
IV

House Calendar No. 210

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 476

[Report No. 105–583]

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 463) to establish the

Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/Commercial

Concerns With the People’s Republic of China.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 17, 1998

Mr. SOLOMON, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 463)

to establish the Select Committee on U.S. National Security and Military/Commercial Concerns With the People’s

Republic of China.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of

3 order to consider in the House the resolution (H. Res.

4 463) to establish the Select Committee on U.S. National

5 Security and Military/Commercial Concerns With the Peo6 ple’s Republic of China. The resolution shall be considered
2

HRES 476 RH

1 as read for amendment. The amendment in the nature of

2 a substitute recommended by the Committee on Rules now

3 printed in the resolution shall be considered as adopted.

4 The resolution, as amended, shall be debatable for one

5 hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

6 ranking minority member of the Committee on Rules. The

7 previous question shall be considered as ordered on the

8 resolution, as amended, to final adoption without interven9 ing motion.

House Calendar No. 210

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 476

[Report No. 105–583]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H.

Concerns With the People’s Republic of China.U.S. National Security and Military/CommercialRes. 463) to establish the Select Committee on

JUNE 17, 1998

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for: 

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No 

 Yes No 

 Yes No 

 Yes No 

(See item 3 in instructions) 

Email Address: 

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case? 

Are you acting as local counsel in this case? 

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar? 

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel 

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel" are you 

a Federal Defender 

 CJA Panel Attorney 

______________________________________________________________________ 

In order to appear before this $ourt an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this $ourt’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 &.%.$#§1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath. 

Executed on 

Attorney signature: S/ 

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.) 

Revised 8/1/2015 

Alhummza Stokes, v. City of

Chicago, et al., 20-cv-4716

Ronald Watts

Brian P. Gainer

Johnson & Bell, LTD

33 W. Monroe Street, Suite 2700

Chicago, Illinois 60603

6286200 312-372-0770

GainerB@jbltd.com

February 15, 2021

Brian P. Gainer

Case: 1:20-cv-04716 Document #: 26 Filed: 02/15/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:72
EXHIBIT 4.03

                               AMENDMENT NO. 3
                         TO THE 1991 STOCK OPTION AND
                             STOCK AWARD PLAN OF
                         CENTURION MINES CORPORATION

WHEREAS, Centurion Mines Corporation (the "Company") adopted the 1991 Stock
Option and Stock Award Plan of Centurion Mines Corporation (the "Plan") on
April 19, 1991; and

WHEREAS, an amendment to the Plan was approved by the Board of Directors of
the Company on May 27, 1993, and approved by the shareholders of the Company
on May 27, 1993; and

WHEREAS, an amendment to the Plan was approved by the Board of Directors of
the Company on April 18, 1995, and approved by the shareholders of the Company
on April 19, 1995.

WHEREAS, an amendment to the Plan was approved by the Board of Directors of
the Company on December 19, 1996, and approved by the shareholders of the
Company on April 29, 1997.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

1.  Section 4 of the Plan shall be amended to increase the number of common
    shares of the Company that may be subject to or issued under awards
    granted pursuant to the terms of the Plan from 2,500,000 to 5,000,000.

2.  Except as amended hereby, the Plan remains unmodified in full force and
    effect.