alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 68635]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27254]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

48 CFR Part 219


Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Technical 
Amendments

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD is making technical amendments to the Defense Federal 
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to provide needed editorial 
changes.

DATES: Effective November 18, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Manuel Quinones, Defense 
Acquisition Regulations System, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DARS), Room 3B941, 3060 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060. Telephone 571-372-6088; 
facsimile 571-372-6094.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  This final rule amends the DFARS as 
follows:
    1. Corrects paragraph designation at 219.201.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 219

    Government procurement.

Manuel Quinones,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.

    Therefore, 48 CFR part 219 is amended as follows:

PART 219--SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS

0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 219 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.


219.201   [Amended]

0
2. Amend section 219.201 by--
0
a. In paragraph (c)(10)(A), removing ``PGI 219.201(d)(10)'' and adding 
``PGI 219.201(c)(10)'' in its place; and
0
b. In paragraph (d), removing ``PGI 219.201(e)'' and adding ``PGI 
219.201(d)'' in its place.

[FR Doc. 2014-27254 Filed 11-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
10267.

#### Cason *v.*The State.

Broyles, P. J.

1. The defendant’s motion for a continuance of the

ease, based upon the absence of two witnesses, did not show that he expected to be able to have the testimony of the witnesses at the next term of court. Moreover,’as shown by the special ground of the motion for a new trial, complaining of the overruling of the motion- for a continuance, both witnesses resided in the state of Florida. Under these circumstances, the court did not err in overruling the motion. Penal Code (1910), § 987; *Boyd*v. *State,*17 *Ga. App.*162 (86 S. E. 411); *Woolfolk*v. *State,*85 *Ga.*69 (4) (11 S. E. 814); *Owins*v. *State,*110 *Ga.*292 (34 S. E. 1015) ; *Minder*v. *State,*113 *Ga.*772 (39 S. E. 284).

2. The charge of the court that “Provocation by words, threats, menaces, or contemptuous gestures shall in nó case be sufficient to free the person, killing from the guilt and crime of murder” (Penal Code, § 65) was not erroneous for any reason assigned. *Deal*v. *State,*145 *Ga.*33 (88 S. E. 573) ; *Buxton*v. *State,*19 *Ga. App.*331 (91 S. E. 490).

3. The 3d special ground of the motion for a new trial (erroneously numbered “4”) is expressly abandoned in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error.

4. Failure to instruct the jury as to the penalty for the offense of assault with intent to murder was not error, in the absence of a timely written request.

5. The fact that two of the jurors were members of the grand jury that found the bill against the- accused is not cause for a new trial. The accused and his counsel, by the exercise of due diligence, could have discovered this fact before the jury was empanelled. *Britt*v. *State,*112 *Ga.*583 (37 S. E. 886).

*541Decided April 12, 1919.

Indictment for assault with intent to murder; from Charlton superior court—Judge Summerall. September 25, 1918.

*James R. Thomas, A. S.*McQueen, for plaintiff in error.

A. *B. Spence, solicitor-general, M. D. Dickerson, Wilson & Bennett, co*ntra.

6. The alleged newly discovered evidence (the basis of the 6th, 7th and 8th special grounds of the motion for a new trial) being cumulative and impeaching in its character, it does not appear that the trial judge abused his broad discretion in overruling these grounds of the motion.

7. The evidence amply authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and Stephens. JJ. concur.*
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION**

Theundersigned officers of NeuroMetrix, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifythat the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K to which thiscertification is attached (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.
| Date: March 29, 2007 |   | /s/ SHAI N. GOZANI, M.D., PH. D.      |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                      |   | Shai N. Gozani, M.D., Ph. D.          |
|                      |   | Chief Executive Officer and President |
|                      |   | /s/ W. BRADFORD SMITH                 |
|                      |   | W. Bradford Smith                     |
|                      |   | Chief Financial Officer               |

 

This certification is being furnished and not filed,and shall not be incorporated into any document for any purpose, under theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 or the Securities Act of 1933.

----
#### William Ray MILLER, Debtor—Appellant, and Donna Mannino, Claimant, v. CIGNA INSURANCE COMPANY, Creditor—Appellee, James R. Wooton, Trustee; Charles R. Goldstein, Trustee, Trustees, and The Insurance Company of North America; Century Indemnity Company; Cigna Fire Underwriters Insurance Company; Cigna Property and Casualty Insurance Company; Indemnity Insurance Company of North America; Pacific Employers Insurance Company; Bankers Standard Insurance Company, Creditors.

No. 04-1878.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 2004.

Decided Dec. 20, 2004.

James R. Schraf, Lipshultz and Hone, Chartered, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellant. Carol L. Hoshall, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

William Ray Miller appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bank*260ruptcy court’s order determining that a debt Miller owed to Cigna Insurance Company was not dischargeable in his bankruptcy proceeding. Our review of the record and the opinions below discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Miller v. Cigna Ins. Co.,*Nos. CA-04-215-1-WDQ, CA-04-216-WDQ, BK-00-1758-6-JS (D.Md. June 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF      2002**

|   | 1. | The                Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Annual Report fairly represents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and result of operations                of the                Registrant. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                John A. Flanagan                                             |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | John                A. FlanaganChief                Financial Officer** ** |
|   |                                                                                 |

----
From: Dan Bogdanov <dan.bogdanov@cyber.ee>

Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 8:45 AM

To: privacyframework <privacyframework@nist.gov>

Subject: Submission of comments to the Preliminary Draft of the NIST Privacy Framework

Dear Sir/Madam,

It is with pleasure that I forward comments to the Preliminary Draft of the NIST Privacy Framework.

These comments are driven by similar work done in ISO/IEC JTC 1 Sub-committee 27, where projects such as ISO/IEC 

29101 (Privacy Architecture Framework) introduce certain technologies like secure multi-party computation, homomorphic 

encryption. In recent times, trusted execution environments such as Intel’s SGX and AMD’s TrustZone have been used 

for similar purpose.

Please find attached the comments. We will be glad to provide additional references or input about the use of the 

technologies in practice, should this be needed.

Best regards,

Dan Bogdanov, PhD

Head of the Department of Information Security Systems Cybernetica AS (Tartu office) Ülikooli 2, 51003 Tartu, ESTONIA 

Phone (+372) 52 75 525 @danbogdanov

https://gcc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsharemind.cyber.ee&data=02%7C01%7Charv

ey.weeks%40nist.gov%7Ca8df063549d34676303208d7588044ca%7C2ab5d82fd8fa4797a93e054655c61dec%7C1%7C1

%7C637075180307733115&sdata=Y%2FXLMEuxAuGW1tR0nSOl278S6q6lfdQstMCjmxoLTWE%3D&reserved

=0
Comment 

#

Organization 

Name

Submitted By 

(Name/Email)

Page 

#

Line # Section Comment

(Include rationale for 

comment)

Suggested Change Type of 

Comment 

(General/Editorial

/Technical)

1 Cybernetica 

AS

Dan Bogdanov 

(dan.bogdanov@cyber.ee)

27 Category PR.DS-P Data-in-use can also 

be protected through 

technologies 

including, but not 

limited to, secure 

multi-party 

computation, 

homomorphic 

encryption (not 

necessarily fully) and 

trusted execution 

environments.

Please add new 

subcategory PR.DS-P3 

(shift existing P3 and 

P4 etc forward by one). 

The new category 

would be named 

"Data-in-use is 

protected".

Technical

2 Cybernetica 

AS

Dan Bogdanov 

(dan.bogdanov@cyber.ee)

28 Category PR.PT-P Sticky policies 

(whether achieved 

through distributed 

computing 

technologies or 

trusted execution 

environments) are a 

helpful technology for 

enforcing that private 

data is processed 

according to the 

purpose.

Please add new 

subcategory PR.PT-P5. 

The new category 

would be named 

"Policy enforcement 

technologies such as 

distributed computing 

with consensus or 

trusted execution 

environments with 

attetation are used."

Technical
3 Cybernetica 

AS

Dan Bogdanov 

(dan.bogdanov@cyber.ee)

28 Category PR.PT-P Should secure 

computing 

technologies be a 

better fit here, please 

consider the following 

change instead of 

Cybernetica comment 

1 above.

Please add new 

subcategory PR.PT-P6. 

The new category 

would be named 

"Secure computing 

technologies 

(including, but not 

limited to, secure 

multi-party 

computation, 

homomorphic 

encryption and trusted 

execution 

environments) are 

used to protect private 

data even from the 

host, data user 

(independently of the 

role).

Technical
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 71 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 71

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Transportation 
         and Infrastructure in the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 1997

 Mr. Shuster submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Transportation 
         and Infrastructure in the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the 
``Committee''), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there 
shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House of 
Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, not more than 
$14,096,282 for the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $7,042,725 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 1997, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 1998; and
            (2) not more than $7,053,557 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 1998, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 1999.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Oversight.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Oversight.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

William H. Joyce, Chairman and ChiefExecutive Officer of Nalco Holdings LLC(‘‘Nalco’’) and Bradley J. Bell, Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of Nalco, in conjunction with thefiling of Nalco’s 10-K financial report (the‘‘Report’’) with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, covering the period ending December 31, 2006, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, asfollows:

|  |          |                                                                                                                     |
|--|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | a.  | The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and |

|  |          |                                                                                                                                    |
|--|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | b.  | Theinformation in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Nalco. |

|  | /S/ William H.Joyce                                 WilliamH. Joyce Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Date: March 5,2007 |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | /S/ Bradley J.Bell                                    Bradley J. BellExecutive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer Date: March 5, 2007 |
|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

A signed original ofthis written statement required by §906 has been provided to NalcoHoldings LLC and will be retained by Nalco Holdings LLC and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The certifications set forth below are herebysubmitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to, and solely forthe purpose of complying with, Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of theUnited States Code in connection with the filing on the date hereof with theSecurities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MAIRHoldings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) for the quarter endedJune 30, 2004 (the “Report”).

 

Each of the undersigned, the Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, herebycertifies that, as of the end of the period covered by the Report:

 

1.               Such Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ PAUL F. FOLEY                                      |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                   |
| Paul F. Foley                                          |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer                 |
| August  16, 2004                                       |
|                                                   |
| /s/ ROBERT E. WEIL                                     |   |
|                                                   |
| Robert E. Weil                                         |
| Vice President, Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| August  16, 2004                                       |

 

----
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 50887 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. JOSE LUIS GONZALEZ

- AYALA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:17

- CR

- 1060

- 1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis Gonzalez

Ayala has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez

- Ayala submitted an untimely supplemental brief , which we construe as a motion for leave to file an out

- of

- time response and GRANT . The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 18, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-50887 Document: 00514560696 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/18/2018No. 17

- 50887

2 evaluation of Gonzalez

- Ayala ’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014 )

. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Gonzalez

- Ayala ’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel i s excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2. Case: 17-50887 Document: 00514560696 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/18/2018
**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF      2002**

|   | (1) | such                Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 fully complies                with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange                Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in such Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period                ended                June 30, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial                condition and results of operations of BrightStar Information Technology                Group, Inc. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                    |                                 |                                                |
|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                               |                            |                                           |
| Date: August              10, 2006 | By:                        | /s/ Brian              S.              Burnett |
|                                    | Brian              S. Burnett        |
|                                    | Chief              Executive Officer |
** **

** **

 

 

 

 

**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of U.S. Premium Beef, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-K for the periodended August 25, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the Report), I, Scott J. Miller, Chief Reporting andCompliance Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

|   |   |                                                                   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:    |   |  /s/ Scott J. Miller                                              |
|   |   |  Scott J. Miller

* Chief Reporting and  Compliance Officer* |

 

Date: November 14, 2007