alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 1998 and consolidated
statement of income for the quarter ended March 31, 1998, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>           0001049624
<NAME>          ESG RE LTD.              
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000                               
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          223,413
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                               0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                 0
<EQUITIES>                                          0
<MORTGAGE>                                          0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                       0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                224,026
<CASH>                                         10,315
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                875
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         20,081
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                364,138
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                20,358
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            73,832
<POLICY-OTHER>                                      0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                               0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       13,924
<OTHER-SE>                                    221,622
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  364,138
<PREMIUMS>                                     23,219
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             3,020
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              1,153
<OTHER-INCOME>                                    970
<BENEFITS>                                     15,642
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     5,270
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 3,538
<INCOME-TAX>                                      287
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             3,251
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    3,251
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.23
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                      0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                 0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                  0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                    0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                     0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                             0
        


</TABLE>
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

IN RE: TIKTOK, INC., 

CONSUMER PRIVACY 

LITIGATION, 

This Document Relates to All Cases 

MDL No. 2948 

Master Docket No. 20-cv-4699 

Judge John Z. Lee 

Magistrate Judge Sunil R. Harjani 

JOINT STATUS REPORT 

As ordered by this Court on November 23, 2020 (ECF No. 107), Plaintiffs filed their 

Consolidated Amended Complaint on December 18, 2020. Notwithstanding the filing of the 

Consolidated Amended Complaint, the Plaintiffs’ Leadership Group is completing their analysis 

of the executed settlement agreement, and the parties anticipate that, if consensus is reached, a 

motion for preliminary approval of that settlement will be filed prior to the next status hearing set 

for January 14, 2021. 

Dated: December 19, 2020 Respectfully Submitted, 

By: /s/ Katrina Carroll 

Katrina Carroll 

CARLSON LYNCH, LLP 

111 W. Washington St. 

Suite 1240 

Chicago IL 60602 

312.750.1265 

kcarroll@carlsonlynch.com 

By: /s/ Elizabeth A. Fegan 

Elizabeth A. Fegan 

FEGAN SCOTT LLC 

150 S. Wacker Dr., 24th Floor 

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 115 Filed: 12/19/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1993
2 

Chicago, IL 60606 

Ph: 312.741.1019 

Fax: 312.264.0100 

beth@hbsslaw.com 

By: /s/ Ekwan Rhow 

Ekwan Rhow 

BIRD, MARELLA, BOXER, WOLPERT, NESSIM, 

DROOKS, LINCENBERG & RHOW, P.C. 

1875 Century Park East, 23rd Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90067 

(310) 201-2100 

erhow@birdmarella.com 

Plaintiffs Co-Lead Counsel 

Dated: December 19, 2020 By: /s/ Anthony J Weibell 

Anthony J Weibell 

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C. 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Telephone: (650) 493-9300 

Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 

aweibell@wsgr.com 

Lead Counsel for Defendants 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 115 Filed: 12/19/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:1994
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I, Katrina Carroll, an attorney, affirm that the foregoing was filed on December 19, 2020 

on ECF, which automatically served all counsel of record. 

 December 19, 2020 By: /s/ Katrina Carroll

 Katrina Carroll 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 115 Filed: 12/19/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:1995
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-20879

Summary Calendar

ALPINE VIEW COMPANY LIMITED; BJORN HANSEN,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

VERSUS

ATLAS COPCO A.B.; ATLAS COPCO ROBBINS;

ATLAS COPCO COMPRESSORS INCORPORATED;

AND ATLAS COPCO COMPTEC INCORPORATED,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

H-95-CV-4477)

August 20, 1998

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM: *

During the pendency of this appeal, our Court sitting en banc

decided Marathon Oil Co. v. A.G. Ruhrgas

, No. 96-20361, 1998 WL

329842 (5th Cir. June 22, 1998) (en banc). The procedural

circumstances involved in th is appeal are very similar to those

involved in Marathon Oil and our decision herein is controlled by2

that en banc decision.

Accordingly, we vacate the following orders entered in the

court below:

a. Memorandum and Recommendation entered under date of July

31, 1996 by the magistrate judge which recommended (i) that

defendant Atlas Copco AB’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal

jurisdiction (docket entry 22) be granted; (ii) that de fendant

Atlas Copco Robbins’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal

jurisdiction (docket entry 26) be granted; and (iii) that

plaintiffs’ motion to remand this case (docket entry 16) be denied

as moot.

b. The Order of the district court enter ed on October 1,

1996 adopting the magistrate judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation

entered under date of July 31, 1996 as described in the foregoing

subparagraph;

c. The Memorandum and Recommendation entered under date of

August 1, 1996 by the magistrate judge which recommended that the

mo tions of defendants Atlas Copco Comptec, Inc. and Atlas Copco

Compressors, Inc. to dismiss for forum non conveniens (docket

entries 4 and 9) be granted; and

d. The Order of the district court ente red under date of

Octob er 1, 1996 adopting the magistrate judge’s Memorandum and

Recommendation entered under date of August 1, 1996 as described in

the foregoing subparagraph.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case be remanded to the3

district court for a determinatio n as to whether the federal

district court has subject matter jurisdiction of the cause of

action as removed from the state court.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT
 
 I,
Chien Chih Liu hereby certify that:
 
 (1)  I have
reviewed this amended  annual report of Rotoblock Corporation;
 
 (2)  Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 (3)  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of Rotoblock Corporation as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;
 
 (4)  Rotoblock
Corporation's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting
as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for Rotoblock
Corporation:
 
 (a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to Rotoblock Corporation, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
   
 (c)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of Rotoblock Corporation's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (d)  Disclosed
in this report any change in Rotoblock Corporation's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during Rotoblock Corporation's most recent
fiscal quarter (Rotoblock Corporation's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, Rotoblock Corporation's internal control over financial
reporting; and
 
 (5)  Rotoblock
Corporation's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
Rotoblock Corporation's auditors and the audit committee of Rotoblock
Corporation's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 (a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect Rotoblock Corporation's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and
 
 (b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in Rotoblock Corporation's internal control over
financial reporting.
  
 Dated: 
March 24,
2010
  ROTOBLOCK
CORPORATION
  /s/ Chien
Chih Liu
  : Chien
Chih Liu, Chief
Executive Officer
exv10w8



 





EXHIBIT
10.8


AMENDED AND RESTATED NOTE




			
	$1,000,000
	 	Dated as of May 29, 2005






     FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION, an Illinois corporation (the
“Maker”) promises to pay to the order of LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national
banking association (the “Bank”) the principal sum of ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000).
This Note is issued pursuant to the terms of that certain Loan Agreement dated even date herewith
(as amended from time to time, the “Loan Agreement’’) between the Bank and the Maker at
the maturity or maturities and in the amount or amounts as stated on the records of the Bank
together with interest (computed on actual days elapsed on the basis of a 360 day year) on any and
all principal amounts outstanding hereunder from time to time from the date hereof until maturity.
Interest shall be payable at the rates of interest and the times set forth in the Loan Agreement.
The principal balance, and all accrued interest thereon, shall be due and payable on June 1, 2015.



     This Note shall be available for direct advances.



     Principal and interest shall be paid to the Bank at its office at 135 South LaSalle Street,
Chicago, Illinois 60603, or at such other place as the holder of this Note may designate in
writing to the Maker. Until all outstanding subordinated indebtedness is paid in full to Bank,
this Note may not be prepaid in whole or in part.



     This Note evidences indebtedness incurred under the Loan Agreement dated April 30, 2003
between the Maker and the Bank, to which reference is hereby made for a statement of the terms and
conditions under which the due date of the Note or any payment thereon may be accelerated. The
holder of this Note is entitled to all of the benefits provided for in the Loan Agreement.



     The Maker agrees that in action or proceeding instituted to collect or enforce collection of
this Note, the amount on the Bank’s records shall be conclusive and binding evidence, absent
demonstrable error, of the unpaid principal balance of this Note.



     This Note amends and replaces that certain $1,000,000 Note dated April 30, 2003 executed by
Maker in favor of the Bank is not payment thereof or a novation.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	WlNTRUST FlNANCIAL CORPORATION  
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	David a Dykstra    8/26/05	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Its:
	 	Senior EVP & COO
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3849 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3849

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide permanent authority 
for the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to continue to operate a program 
to provide counseling and treatment for veterans who while in military 
        service experienced sexual trauma or sexual harassment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2004

 Mr. Rodriguez (for himself, Mr. Evans, and Mr. Gutierrez) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide permanent authority 
for the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to continue to operate a program 
to provide counseling and treatment for veterans who while in military 
        service experienced sexual trauma or sexual harassment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Sexual Trama Counseling Act 
of 2004''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT AUTHORITY FOR SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TO 
              OPERATE SEXUAL TRAUMA COUNSELING PROGRAM.

    Section 1720D(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``During the period 
        through December 31, 2004, the'' and inserting ``The''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``, during the period 
        through December 31, 2004,''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 577 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 577

 Permitting official photographs of the House of Representatives to be 
              taken while the House is in actual session.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 5, 1998

 Mr. Thomas submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Permitting official photographs of the House of Representatives to be 
              taken while the House is in actual session.

    Resolved, That at a time designated by the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, official photographs of the House may be taken while 
the House is in actual session. Payment for the costs associated with 
taking, preparing, and distributing such photographs may be made from 
the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      13,957,000
<SECURITIES>                                 9,928,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,643,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (600,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 12,477,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            55,219,000
<PP&E>                                      13,073,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,082,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              92,845,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       24,661,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  64,211,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                92,845,000
<SALES>                                     60,386,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            60,386,000
<CGS>                                       33,386,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,737,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             797,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,095,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,391,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,704,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,704,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .252
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .241
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF      2002**

|   | 1. | The                Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Annual Report fairly represents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and result of operations                of the                Registrant. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                             | /s/                      Samuel Masucci, III |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|   | Samuel                            Masucci, IIIChief                            Executive Officer |

----
#### A. Johns *v.*A. A. Cassady.

Evidence — Rejection of Proposed Evidence — Statement.

Where a party offers to prove a fact, which the court holds to be incompetent, he should make a statement as to what the evidence would be on that point and incorporate it in the bill of exceptions.

APPEAL PROM HART GIRCUIT COURT.

April 19, 1872.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters :

If Cassady purchased the cattle for Huber, it would have been competent for appellant to prove the statements of Huber in relation to the contract. But appellant failed to disclose what Compton would prove in relation to the statements made by Huber, and this court cannot tell unless appellant had announced to the court what the conversation was which he would prove by the witness, and the same had been incorporated in the 'bill of exceptions, that it would have been material for appellant, and as it does noit appear that appellant was prejudiced by the ruling of the court, it cannot be a cause of reversal.

It is alleged in the petition that appellee purchased the cattle at $3 per hundred to be paid on delivery, and that appellant failed to deliver the cattle at the time and place of delivery, and that the cattle were worth $3.50 per hundred; which, by any fair or reasonable interpretation, means that they wer'e at the time and place of delivery worth $3.50 per hundred.

It was not made the duty of appellee either by the terms of the contract, or by the law, for him to make the necessary ¡preparation to weigh the cattle.

There is nothing in the objection that Cassady did not sign the contract. Johns was the vendor, and by his writing was bound to deliver or to tender the cattle, and if Cassady had failed to attend to receive them, and he had' thereby suffered loss, the law afforded him ample remedy.

As to the price of the cattle, Rowtill proves they had advanced in the neighborhood from to Per cent, per pound, and he told appellant that they had so advanced, and he admitted it.

It is deemed unnecessary to enter upon a discussion of the *165competency of the evidence relating to the agreement on the part of appellant to accept the appellee’s check on the bank in payment for the cattle, as the evidence was noit objected to, but was permitted to go to the jury without exception.

*Brown & Murray, for appellant.*

*H. C. Marlin, Wm. Beard, for appellee.*

And perceiving no error in refusing instructions as asked by appellant, and in modifying those given, the judgment must be *affirmed.*
10034.

#### Almond *v.*Coalson *et al.*

Decided June 12, 1919.

Complaint; from city court of Carrollton—Judge Beall. June 12, 1918.

*Boykin & Boykin,*for plaintiff. *J. L. Vaughan, S. Eolderness, C. E. Roop,*for defendants.

Luke, J.

This was an action on a promissary note, to which the defendant Coalson pleaded discharge in bankruptcy. The evidence shows . ‘ that within the time permitted by the bankruptcy act the plaintiff in this case, who had been inadvertently omitted from the schedule of creditors in the bankruptcy proceeding, was, by duly allowed amendment, added, and was served with proper notice as a creditor; and it further-' appearing that the bankrupt was allowed his discharge in bankruptcy from the debt sued upon, it was not error for the court to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant Coalson.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.*