alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our report dated February 10, 2005,accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Eagle Hospitality Properties Trust, Inc. and the combined financial statements of its predecessor companies on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Eagle Hospitality Properties Trust, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-128798, effective October 4, 2005, File No. 333-128799, effective January 13, 2006,File No. 333-128800, effective October 4, 2005, and File No. 333-139085, effective December 1, 2006) and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-119516, effective October 4, 2004). 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP 

Cincinnati, Ohio 

February 21, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001049530
<NAME> ACME INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, LLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             756
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,921
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,492
<PP&E>                                          29,847
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,055
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 340,951
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,094
<BONDS>                                        203,807
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           16,250
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        96,708
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   340,951
<SALES>                                         42,438
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,438
<CGS>                                           90,761
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   90,761
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,113
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,182
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (67,436)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,357
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (66,079)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (66,079)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
As of: 8/19/21 8:58 AM 

Received: August 18, 2021 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. ksi-lad8-lrv2 

Comments Due: August 19, 2021 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: NIST-2021-0004 

Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework 

Comment On: NIST-2021-0004-0001 

Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework 

Document: NIST-2021-0004-DRAFT-0020 

Comment on FR Doc # 2021-1617 6 

Submitter Information 

Name: Aarin King 

Address: 

SACRAMENTO, CA, 95829 

Email: 

Phone: 

General Comment 

NIST-2021-0004-0001 18AUG2021 1422 

Offering the decision to keep framework within the reason that Artificial Intelligence has been hyperextenuated through media and entertainment. It should maintain the appearance that it does not have the 

golden egg or miracle cure to life's changing issues. When creating the framework for AI the need to keep 

the status of being an aide in computer analysis and resolutions for fact-finding be kept as apparent as 

possible. Should the ability to generate conspicuous data that is in fact documentable, the reason and logic 

behind its decision tree should be clearly identifiable. It is given that a group of developers is encouraged 

to secure direct Internet Protocols for the purpose of improving its operational programming and reliance 

on communicative functions. Granted that the reality is for improved economy and benefit from work 

provided by AI, there should be a grouping of open community protections that are affirmative and 

responded by request to public and private recommendations. Being able to operate in seclusion or LAN 

shouldn't derive static negative feedback, it should be presented as a move to prove before release with 

the need to draw over substantiated claims. Lending or leasing the operational power should meet within 

the general compliance that patent and intellectual properties require and are given regardless of 

community or individual corporate size. 

selective-service:*9-1 **41 *1-6 DOD-id:*****68301/Navy UE ID: UZ*Y-3B**TQ TWIC:217****5 

Branch of Service: Navy/MM-0000. MIT withholder. Previous Duty Station- COMSUBDEV5 UICN30646 Party: Republican/Libertarian
10228.

#### Burress *et al. v.*Montgomery *et al.*

Luke, J.

1. Where a contract provides that A, B, and C, individuals undertaking its performance, may be relieved *as such individuals when, upon the organization of a corporation, the contract shall have been transferred to the corporation and its obligations assumed by the corpo*591ration, such transfer of the contract and a course of dealings by the opposite party with the corporation, and acceptance of payments and notes of the corporation for liabilities incurred, thereunder, relieve A, B, and C from their individual liability under the contract.

Decided April 17, 1919.

Complaint; from Fulton superior court—Judge Ellis. April 16, 1918.

*Burress & Dillard, Horton Brothers,*for plaintiffs.

*A. E. Wilson, Evins & Moore,*for defendants.

*(а)*Under the evidence in this case the court was authorized to direct that the jury find that there was no individual liability upon the part of the defendants. . • -

(б) There was no evidence that the defendants had ever incurred as individuals any liability to the plaintiff's.

2. The court did not err in directing a verdict in favor of the defendants.

*.Judgment affirmed:*

*Wade, C. V., and Jenhins, J., concur.*
#### STATE v. EVANS

No. 109P97

Case below: 125 N.C.App. 301

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 23 July 1997. Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal allowed 23 July 1997.
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 588 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                 House Calendar No. 276
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 588

                          [Report No. 105-805]

  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4761) to require the 
United States Trade Representative to take certain actions in response 
to the failure of the European Union to comply with the rulings of the 
                       World Trade Organization.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 9, 1998

    Mr. Dreier, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4761) to require the 
United States Trade Representative to take certain actions in response 
to the failure of the European Union to comply with the rulings of the 
                       World Trade Organization.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 4761) to require the United States Trade 
Representative to take certain actions in response to the failure of 
the European Union to comply with the rulings of the World Trade 
Organization. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final 
passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on 
the bill equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion 
to recommit.
                                     





                                                 House Calendar No. 276

105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 588

                          [Report No. 105-805]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4761) to require the 
United States Trade Representative to take certain actions in response 
to the failure of the European Union to comply with the rulings of the 
                       World Trade Organization.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 9, 1998

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 383 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 383

 To amend the Federal Credit Union Act with respect to the limitations 
                       on member business loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2003

  Mr. Royce introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Credit Union Act with respect to the limitations 
                       on member business loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Faith-Based Lending Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. MEMBER BUSINESS LOAN EXCLUSION FOR LOANS TO NONPROFIT RELIGIOUS 
              ORGANIZATIONS.

    Section 107A(a) of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 
1757a(a)) is amended by inserting ``, excluding loans made to nonprofit 
religious organizations,'' after ``total amount of such loans''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,579
<SECURITIES>                                    29,141
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,343
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (275)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,735
<PP&E>                                           7,469
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2,139)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,385
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,873
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,268
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,385
<SALES>                                          7,089
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,089
<CGS>                                            2,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,509
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (307)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    887
<INCOME-TAX>                                       289
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                598
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       598
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of AMH Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the
fiscal year ended January 1, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, D. Keith LaVanway, Vice President  Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1)
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: April 1, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ D. Keith LaVanwayD. Keith LaVanway
Vice President  Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3824 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3824

 To facilitate the operation, maintenance, and capital improvement of 
       Camp Navajo, Arizona, by the Arizona Army National Guard.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 2004

  Mr. Renzi introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To facilitate the operation, maintenance, and capital improvement of 
       Camp Navajo, Arizona, by the Arizona Army National Guard.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT OF CAMP 
              NAVAJO, ARIZONA.

    (a) Private Sector Use of Camp Navajo.--The Secretary of the Army 
shall enter into an agreement with the State of Arizona, acting by and 
through the Adjutant General of the Arizona Army National Guard, to 
amend License No. DACA09-3-82-153 between the Secretary and the State 
of Arizona, which relates to the use of Camp Navajo, the former Navajo 
Depot Activity, Arizona, by the Arizona Army National Guard as a year-
round training and support installation, to authorize the Arizona Army 
National Guard to use excess capacity at Camp Navajo to provide 
services and facilities for a fee to private sector entities.
    (b) Construction of Facilities.--The amendment required by 
subsection (a) shall authorize the construction of facilities at Camp 
Navajo by private sector entities, except that appropriated funds may 
not be used for this purpose, and no private entity shall obtain any 
ownership rights in any customer-funded facilities.
    (c) Termination of Contracts.--Any contract with a private sector 
entity entered into pursuant to the amended license shall include a 
provision providing for the termination of the contract in the event 
Camp Navajo facilities are needed for national defense purposes.
    (d) Hold Harmless.--Contracts with private entities entered into 
pursuant to the amended license shall contain provisions holding the 
United States harmless for any liability that may arise due to the 
private entity utilizing Camp Navajo facilities and holding the private 
entity responsible for any environmental cleanup and compliance 
required by their activities at Camp Navajo.
    (e) Treatment of Receipts.--Revenues generated under contracts with 
private entities entered into pursuant to the amended license may be 
deposited in the Camp Navajo fund established by section 26-152 of the 
Arizona Revised Statutes, but such revenues shall be used only to 
support the infrastructure and troop programs of the Arizona Army 
National Guard.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit No. 99.1

TRUSTEE STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

I, David
J. Kolibachuk, acting on behalf of U.S. Bank Trust National Association (the Trustee), hereby certify that the Trustee has fulfilled its obligations as trustee under the trust agreement, dated May 20, 2004, between Corporate Asset
Backed Corporation, as depositor, and the Trustee, with respect to the CABCO Series 2004-101 Trust (Goldman Sachs Capital I) during the period from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016.

Date: February 24, 2017



U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, as Trustee ofCABCO Series 2004-101 Trust (Goldman Sachs Capital I)By:

/s/ David J. KolibachukName: David J. KolibachukTitle: Vice President
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00360-CV

Mark Lesher and Rhonda Lesher

v.

Charlie Doescher, Pat Doescher, 

Apache Iron Metal & Auto Salvage, 

Inc. d/b/a Apache Truck & Van Parts, 

Gerald Coyel (aka Jerry Coyel) in his 

individual capacity and d/b/a Apache 

Truck & Van Parts, and Shannon 

Coyel

§

§

§

§

From the 348th District Court

of Tarrant County (348-235791-09)

October 10, 2013

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellants Mark Lesher and Rhonda Lesher shall 

pay all of the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _________________________________

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
From: Christine Custis 

Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2022 12:29:40 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)

To: aiframework <aiframework@nist.gov> 

Subject: Comments for 2nd draft of the NIST AI RMF

Thanks so much for allowing us to participate in this work!!! 

A couple of high-level comments:

Dangers of Metrics (§3.2.1 & §6)

We encourage adding a caution to this section regarding potential pitfalls of oversimplification 

that should be avoided when assessing human harms via metrics. For example, Moss et al note 

that “impacts” measured as “metrics” may be bent to the organizational and bureaucratic needs of 

institutions - this abstraction opens the opportunity for real harms to become missed, warped, or 

erased. Further, oversimplification in the process of “metricifying” has created problems in several 

fields. Saxena et. al note that the use of metrics in assessing child welfare via singular metrics for 

algorithmic case tracking can erase critical nuance, and also open cases to gamification from human 

workers who struggle to get algorithmic systems to adjudicate resources according to their discretion. 

Additionally, Christin studies the use of metrics in journalism, finding that humans respond to metrics in 

unexpected, locally contingent ways - it's hard to anticipate how humans will react to, use, and operate 

with, alongside, and underneath metrics. 

Increased Emphasis on Recovery Plans (§6.4)

The Manage function currently focuses heavily on continuous evaluation & mediation but places 

little emphasis on recovery planning. While §3.2.3 notes that “ incidents and failures cannot be 

eliminated”, aside from the mention of “decommissioning, incident response, and change 

management” in Manage 4, there is little clear discussion regarding recovery from realized 

harms vs. managing of risks (aka prevention of harm). Recovery plans prove very useful in 

many forms of traditional safety engineering, the RMF does not go into much detail or 

discussion on how these may exist in the space of AI systems.

Christine Custis (she/her/hers)

Director of Programs and Research

PartnershipOnAI.org | Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook

If you are a PAI Partner, sign up here to receive Partner-only news and updates!
##### 



Citizens Effingham Bancshares, Inc. And Subsidiary
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005
 Exhibit 32.2
  (1)
    
    To the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
the Company.
  /s/ Harry H. ShearouseHarry H. Shearouse
President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
AGENDA

MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2019

TIME AGENDA ITEM

8:00 AM Registration, Poster Set-up, Exhibitor Set-up, Continental Breakfast

9:00 AM Welcome and Introduction

Scott Jackson, NIST

Eric Lin, Director, Material Measurement Laboratory, NIST

SESSION 1: LIVE BIOTHERAPEUTIC PRODUCTS

9:35 AM Ricardo Valladares, Siolta Therapeutics 

9:55 AM Dana Walsh, Rebiotix

10:15 AM Poster and Refreshment Break

10:45 AM Kit Goldman, USP

11:05 AM Paul Carlson, FDA/CBER

11:25 AM Jeffrey Heiser, Boston Analytical

11:45 AM PANEL DISCUSSION: Manufacturing Hurdles for LBPs

12:45 PM LUNCH

1:45 PM Sheila Dreher-Lesnick, FDA/CBER

SESSION 2: MICROBIAL METROLOGY AT NIST

2:05 PM

NIST Speakers

- Jason Kralj, NIST

- Sam Forry, NIST

- Stephanie Servatas, NIST

- Nancy Lin, NIST

- Sandra Da Silva, NIST

- Joy Dunkers, NIST

- Heidi Leonard, NIST

- Kirsten Parratt, NIST

- Guilherme Pinheiro, INMETRO

3:05 PM Poster and Refreshment Break
SESSION 3: CONSORTIA MODELS

3:35 PM Elisha Wood-Charlson, Dept of Energy Systems Biology Knowledgebase (KBase)

3:45 PM

NIST Consortia Models

Justin Zook, NIST

Samantha Maragh, NIST

Scott Jackson, NIST

4:15 PM PANEL DISCUSSION: Consortium

5:25 PM Closing Remarks

Scott Jackson, NIST

5:30 PM ADJOURN

TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2019

TIME AGENDA ITEM

8:30 AM Continental Breakfast

9:00 AM Opening Remarks

SESSION 4: CLINICAL METAGENOMICS

9:05 AM Raja Mazumder, GWU

9:25 AM Brittney Goldberg, FDA/CDRH

9:45 AM Lightning Talks

 - Glen Satten, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

 - Brian Granger, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard

 - Ravi Sheth, Karius, Inc.

 - Fred Christians, Columbia University

10:10 AM Poster and Refreshment Break

SESSION 5: DATA ANALYTICS

10:40 AM Daryl Gohl, University of Minnesota Genomics Center

11:00 AM Jennifer Barb and Phil McQueen, NIH

11:20 AM Ben Callahan, NC State

11:40 AM PANEL DISCUSSION: Data Analytics

12:30 PM LUNCH
SESSION 6: STANDARDS FOR MICROBIOME PRODUCTS

1:30 PM Scott Jackson, NIST

1:50 PM Raul Cano, The BioCollective

2:10 PM Gregory C A Amos, NIBSC

2:30 PM Jennifer Balkus, University of Washington

2:50 PM Poster and Refreshment Break

3:20 PM Christian Abnet, NIH/NCI

3:40 PM Scott Tighe, University of Vermont

4:00 PM Dieter Tourlousse, AIST

4:20 PM PANEL DISCUSSION: Standards for Microbiome Products

5:10 PM Concluding Remarks

Scott Jackson, NIST

5:15 PM ADJOURN