alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

NIKE, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SHOP3036010 STORE, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 20-cv-03708 

Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman 

Magistrate Judge Sunil R. Harjani

SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT 

WHEREAS, a judgment was entered in the above action on September 16, 2020 [54], in 

favor of Plaintiff Nike, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Nike”) and against the Defendants Identified in 

Schedule A in the amount of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) per Defaulting Defendant 

for willful use of counterfeit Nike Trademarks in connection with the offer for sale and/or sale of 

products through at least the Defendant Internet Stores, and Nike acknowledges payment of an 

agreed upon damages amount, costs, and interest and desires to release this judgment and hereby 

fully and completely satisfy the same as to the following Defendants: 

Defendant Name Line No. 

dudeli Store 32

PUAMSS GSPORTS Store 154

THEREFORE, full and complete satisfaction of said judgment as to the above-referenced 

Defendants is hereby acknowledged, and the Clerk of the Court is hereby authorized and directed 

to make an entry of the full and complete satisfaction on the docket of said judgment. 

Case: 1:20-cv-03708 Document #: 59 Filed: 01/08/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:3774
2 

Dated this 8th day of January 2021. Respectfully submitted, 

 

/s/ RiKaleigh C. Johnson 

Amy C. Ziegler 

Justin R. Gaudio 

RiKaleigh C. Johnson 

 Jake M. Christensen 

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. 

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

312.360.0080 / 312.360.9315 (facsimile) 

aziegler@gbc.law 

jgaudio@gbc.law 

rjohnson@gbc.law 

 jchristensen@gbc.law 

Counsel for Plaintiff Nike, Inc.

Case: 1:20-cv-03708 Document #: 59 Filed: 01/08/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:3775
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18

- 0908 V

UNPUBLISHED

CARLA PAVAO

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: January 13, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
Administration (SIRVA)

Howard Scott Go ld, Gold Law Firm , LLC, Wellesley Hills, MA , for petitioner.

Mollie Danielle Gorney , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On June 25, 2018

, Carla Pa vao filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. , 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a left shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ( “ S IRVA ” ) as a result of an influen za ( “ flu ” ) vaccine administered

on November 1 7 , 2016 . Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On January 13, 2020

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, R espondent states that “ p etitioner has satisfied the

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Managemen t and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 19 86, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C.

§ 300aa (2012 ).2

criteria set forth in the revised Vac cine Injury Table and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation, which aff ord petitioners a presumption of causation if onset of S IRVA

occurs within forty

- eight hou rs after recei pt of a sea s onal flu vaccination and there is no
apparent alternative cause. ” Id. at 6 . Respondent further agrees that “ the medical

records demonst rate that petitioner has experienced the residual effects of her SIRVA

for more than six months . . .

. [an d] has satisfied all legal pre requisites for
compensation under the Act

. ” Id.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
<PAGE>

                                                       VORNADO OPERATING COMPANY
                                                           210 Route 4 East
                                                           Paramus, NJ 07652

CONTACTS: JOSEPH MACNOW
          (201) 587-7721

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - November 4, 2004

                       VORNADO OPERATING COMPANY ANNOUNCES
                         THE SALE OF AMERICOLD LOGISTICS

PARAMUS, NEW JERSEY...VORNADO OPERATING COMPANY (OTC BB: VOOC) announced today
that a partnership in which it has a 60% interest has sold AmeriCold Logistics
("AmeriCold") to its landlord (the "Purchaser") for $47.7 million in cash. The
sale of AmeriCold was negotiated and approved by a Special Committee of Vornado
Operating Company's independent directors formed to consider and negotiate this
transaction. The Special Committee was advised by an independent investment
banker and independent legal counsel.

The Board of Directors is considering alternatives for Vornado Operating
Company, including liquidation and dissolution, which would have to be approved
by a majority of the holders of Vornado Operating Company's common shares.
Vornado Operating Company estimates that a liquidating distribution would be
approximately $2.00 per share or unit as compared to the last trading price of
$0.35 per share, although the actual amount may be higher or lower depending on
whether its remaining liabilities turn out to be higher or lower than the
estimated amounts.

Vornado Operating Company has been advised that the owners of the Purchaser,
VORNADO REALTY TRUST (NYSE: VNO) and CRESCENT REAL ESTATE EQUITIES COMPANY
(NYSE: CEI), have entered into a definitive agreement to sell 20.7% of the
Purchaser's common shares. Vornado Operating Company's Special Committee and its
advisors were aware of the details of the transaction with Yucaipa when they
approved the sale of AmeriCold to the Purchaser.

Certain statements contained herein may constitute "forward-looking statements"
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such
forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of
Vornado Operating Company to be materially different from any future results,
performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements.

                                    # # # #
SUBROUTINE DEXPPF(P,PPF)
C
C     PURPOSE--THIS SUBROUTINE COMPUTES THE PERCENT POINT
C              FUNCTION VALUE FOR THE DOUBLE EXPONENTIAL
C              (LAPLACE) DISTRIBUTION WITH MEAN = 0 AND
C              STANDARD DEVIATION = SQRT(2).
C              THIS DISTRIBUTION IS DEFINED FOR ALL X AND HAS
C              THE PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION
C              F(X) = 0.5*EXP(-ABS(X)). 
C              NOTE THAT THE PERCENT POINT FUNCTION OF A DISTRIBUTION 
C              IS IDENTICALLY THE SAME AS THE INVERSE CUMULATIVE
C              DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION OF THE DISTRIBUTION.
C     INPUT  ARGUMENTS--P      = THE SINGLE PRECISION VALUE 
C                                (BETWEEN 0.0 AND 1.0)
C                                AT WHICH THE PERCENT POINT 
C                                FUNCTION IS TO BE EVALUATED.
C     OUTPUT ARGUMENTS--PPF    = THE SINGLE PRECISION PERCENT
C                                POINT FUNCTION VALUE.
C     OUTPUT--THE SINGLE PRECISION PERCENT POINT
C             FUNCTION VALUE PPF.
C     PRINTING--NONE UNLESS AN INPUT ARGUMENT ERROR CONDITION EXISTS. 
C     RESTRICTIONS--P SHOULD BE BETWEEN 0.0 AND 1.0, EXCLUSIVELY.
C     OTHER DATAPAC   SUBROUTINES NEEDED--NONE.
C     FORTRAN LIBRARY SUBROUTINES NEEDED--ALOG.
C     MODE OF INTERNAL OPERATIONS--SINGLE PRECISION.
C     LANGUAGE--ANSI FORTRAN. 
C     REFERENCES--FILLIBEN, SIMPLE AND ROBUST LINEAR ESTIMATION
C                 OF THE LOCATION PARAMETER OF A SYMMETRIC
C                 DISTRIBUTION (UNPUBLISHED PH.D. DISSERTATION,
C                 PRINCETON UNIVERSITY), 1969, PAGES 21-44, 229-231.
C               --FILLIBEN, 'THE PERCENT POINT FUNCTION',
C                 (UNPUBLISHED MANUSCRIPT), 1970, PAGES 28-31.
C               --JOHNSON AND KOTZ, CONTINUOUS UNIVARIATE
C                 DISTRIBUTIONS--2, 1970, PAGES 22-36.
C     WRITTEN BY--JAMES J. FILLIBEN
C                 STATISTICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY (205.03)
C                 NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS
C                 WASHINGTON, D. C. 20234
C                 PHONE:  301-921-2315
C     ORIGINAL VERSION--JUNE      1972. 
C     UPDATED         --SEPTEMBER 1975. 
C     UPDATED         --NOVEMBER  1975. 
C
C---------------------------------------------------------------------
C
      IPR=6
C
C     CHECK THE INPUT ARGUMENTS FOR ERRORS
C
      IF(P.LE.0.0.OR.P.GE.1.0)GOTO50
      GOTO90
   50 WRITE(IPR,1)
      WRITE(IPR,46)P
      RETURN
   90 CONTINUE
    1 FORMAT(1H ,115H***** FATAL ERROR--THE FIRST  INPUT ARGUMENT TO THE
     1 DEXPPF SUBROUTINE IS OUTSIDE THE ALLOWABLE (0,1) INTERVAL *****)
   46 FORMAT(1H , 35H***** THE VALUE OF THE ARGUMENT IS ,E15.8,6H *****)
C
C-----START POINT-----------------------------------------------------
C
      IF(P.LE.0.5)PPF=ALOG(2.0*P)
      IF(P.GT.0.5)PPF=-ALOG(2.0*(1.0-P))
C
      RETURN
      END
**EXHIBIT 12.8**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002**

 

I, Rick Medlock, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 20-F of Inmarsat Ventures Limited (the “Company”); 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.    The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: 

 

(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

 

(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.    The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)    All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)    Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Jesus Cruz

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03719

Honorable Robert M. Dow Jr.

Los Compadres Enterprises, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, January 25, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Pursuant to the

stipulation of dismissal [26] filed on 1/25/2021, this case is dismissed with prejudice with

each side to bear its own fees and costs. Status hearing date of 1/26/2021 is stricken and

no appearances are necessary on that date. Civil case terminated. Emailed notice(cdh, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03719 Document #: 27 Filed: 01/25/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:65
CFTC Ex. 66

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-4 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1007
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-4 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 2 of 10 PageID #:1008
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-4 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 3 of 10 PageID #:1009
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-4 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 4 of 10 PageID #:1010
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-4 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 5 of 10 PageID #:1011
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-4 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 6 of 10 PageID #:1012
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-4 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 7 of 10 PageID #:1013
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-4 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 8 of 10 PageID #:1014
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-4 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 9 of 10 PageID #:1015
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-4 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 10 of 10 PageID #:1016
No. ___________

In the

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

______________________________________

On Appeal from the 268th Judicial District Court of

Fort Bend County, Texas

Cause Number 08-DCR-048561; and the Opinion of the First Court of Appeals

in Cause Number 01-14-00260-CR, Delivered September 15, 2015

______________________________________

ARTHUR ALEXANDER OFFICE

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

_____________________________________

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

PRO SE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

______________________________

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL 

APPEALS:

COMES NOW, Kristen Jernigan, the undersigned attorney of record for 

Arthur Alexander Office, the Appellant, herein, and files this Motion for Extension 

of Time to File Pro Se Petition for Discretionary Review. As set out below, the 

undersigned respectfully requests a thirty-day extension so that Appellant can file 

his Pro Se Petition for Discretionary Review. In support of said motion, the 

undersigned would show the Court the following:

1. Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review is currently due in this 

case on October 15, 2015.

PD-1236-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 9/21/2015 12:00:00 AM

Accepted 9/22/2015 12:53:31 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
2. Appellant seeks an extension of thirty days in which to file his 

Petition for Discretionary Review, making his Petition due on or before November 

14, 2015.

3. The undersigned counsel will not be representing Appellant after the 

filing of this motion. Appellant will now have to obtain and review the record in 

order to prepare and file a pro se Petition for Discretionary Review. The 

undersigned believes that there is insufficient time between now and October, 

2015, to accomplish those goals. Appellant is currently confined in federal 

custody in Philadelphia. Consequently, the undersigned respectfully requests that 

the Court grant Appellant the additional time.

4. The undersigned has not filed any previous motions for extension of 

time in this case.

5. For the reasons set forth above, the undersigned respectfully requests 

that Appellant be granted an extension of thirty days so that his brief in this case 

will now be due on November 14, 2015.

PRAYER

 WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the undersigned

respectfully requests that this Court grant this Motion for Extension of Time to File 

Pro Se Petition for Discretionary Review.

Respectfully submitted,

_______/s/__Kristen Jernigan______

KRISTEN JERNIGAN

State Bar Number 90001898

207 S. Austin Ave.

Georgetown, Texas 78626

(512) 904-0123

(512) 931-3650 (fax)

Kristen@txcrimapp.com
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time has been mailed to the Fort 

Bend County District Attorney’s Office, 301 Jackson Street, Richmond, Texas, 

77469, on September 19, 2015.

__/s/ Kristen Jernigan__________________

Kristen Jernigan
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Tyrion S Hodges

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04760

Honorable John F. Kness

Rochelle Parker, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, December 21, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: In−Person status hearing held

on 12/21/2021. Only counsel for Defendants appeared. A continued hearing is set for

1/14/2022 at 10:20 AM. That hearing is to be held in−person in Courtroom 1725.

Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants are directed to appear in−person at the 1/14/2022

hearing. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff at his last known

address (see Dkt. 43). Plaintiff has now failed to appear as ordered [50]. Although this

may be due to inadvertence, Plaintiff is advised that, if he does not appear at the

1/14/2022 hearing, the Court will dismiss the case for want of prosecution. See, e.g.,

James v. McDonald's Corp., 417 F.3d 672, 681 (7th Cir. 2005) ("Once a party invokes the

judicial system by filing a lawsuit, it must abide by the rules of the court; a party cannot

decide for itself when it feels like pressing its action and when it feels like taking a

break") (cleaned up); Harrington v. City of Chi., 433 F.3d 542, 549−50 (7th Cir. 2006)

(affirming dismissal where district court gave explicit dismissal warning concerning

failure to prosecute). On or before 1/12/2022, Defendants must submit a report detailing

the steps their counsel has taken since early October to confer with Plaintiff concerning

the status of the litigation and a discovery plan. Mailed notice(ef, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04760 Document #: 51 Filed: 12/21/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:180
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000835928
<NAME> A.P. HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,887
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,697
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,728)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,622
<PP&E>                                          83,504
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,195
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 209,620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,749
<BONDS>                                        215,923
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           30,995
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (95,760)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   209,620
<SALES>                                        183,975
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               183,975
<CGS>                                          142,595
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  142,595
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,895
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,807
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,220)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       524
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,744)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,744)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>