alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.2

                              [MaxxZone letterhead]

                                  June 1, 2004

David M. Otto
The Otto Law Group,  PLLC
900 Fourth Avenue, Suit 3140
Seattle, WA 98164

Dear Mr. Otto:

         This letter  agreement  memorializes  our agreement as to amending that
certain  Consulting  Services  Agreement dated February 12, 2004, by and between
maxZone.com,  Inc.,  a Nevada  corporation,  and The Otto Law  Group,  PLLC (the
"Agreement"),  as amended on April 22, 2004 and May 19,  2004.  All  capitalized
terms used  herein  shall be  ascribed  those  definitions  provided  for in the
Agreement.

         Section 6 of the Agreement is hereby  amended so that the Company shall
issue an additional  twelve million  (12,000,000)  shares of common stock of the
Company to Consultant  for the  performance  of the  Consulting  Services to the
Company.

         If you agree with the foregoing, please sign below and return a copy of
this letter to me by facsimile today and the original by overnight delivery.

                                            Sincerely,

                                            Walter H. Roder II

Agreed and Accepted:

The Otto Law Group,  PLLC

By:  _______________________________
     Name:  ________________________
     Title:  _______________________

Date:  __________________________
#### John C. Caley *v.*State of Indiana.

[No. 3-375A41.

Filed November 24, 1975.]

*680
      *Dale J. Myers,*of Fort Wayne, for appellant.

*Theodore L. Sendak,*Attorney General, *Wesley T. Wilson,*Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

Staton, P.J.

The trial court found John C. Caley guilty of theft by obtaining control over stolen property. IC 1971, 35-17-5-3 (1) (f) and (2) (a),Ind. Ann. Stat. § 10-3030 (1) (f) and (2) (a) (Burns Supp. 1975). He was sentenced to the Indiana Department of Correction for a period of one to ten years. Caley’s belated motion to correct errors raises two issues:

> 1. Was the evidence sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Caley knew the property was stolen?

> 2. Was the variance between the affidavit and the proof at trial as to the date of the theft fatal ?

We affirm.

The evidence most favorable to the State is that Robert Huffman and Robert Shirely, employees at Caley’s pool hall, had stolen eight hundred and thirty-eight pounds of meat from a Ponderosa Steak House in Fort Wayne, Indiana on April 29, 1973. Later the same day, they *681contacted Caley to arrange for the sale of the meat. Both' ' Huffman and Shirely testified that they told Caley that the meat had come from the Ponderosa. The meat was packed in fifty-pound cartons stamped “Ponderosa.” Huffman and his wife testified that Caley transferred the meat from Huffman’s station wagon to his own car. Huffman accompanied Caley when Caley sold most of the meat for forty dollars a carton. Caley retained twenty dollars and gave Huffman the other twenty dollars to split with Shirely.

We conclude that the evidence was sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt Caley’s knowledge that the meat was stolen. *See Young*v. *State*(1975), 264 Ind. 14, 332 N.E.2d 103, 105; *Liford*v. *State*(1975), 164 Ind. App. 349, 328 N.E.2d 443.

April 30, 1973 was the date used in the charging affidavit. April 29, 1973, the day before, was the date proved by the State at trial. Caley contends that this is a fatal variance. We disagree. In *Hammond v. State*(1960), 240 Ind. 313, 315, 164 N.E.2d 640, 641, our Indiana Supreme Court stated:

> “[T]he State does not have to prove the particular date alleged in the indictment or affidavit so long as it is within the period of statutes of limitation, since time is not of the essence of the particular offense involved.” *See Beard*v. *State*(1975), 164 Ind. App. 210, 327 N.E.2d 629.

Time is not of the essence in Caley’s offense.

We affirm.

Hoffman, J. and Garrard, J., concur.

Note. — Reported at 337 N.E.2d 571.
**Exhibit99.1**

 

**Certification**

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers ofFirst Consulting Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), doeshereby certify that:

 

(i)             theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscalquarter ended March 28, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)          theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: | May 12, 2003 |   | */s/  Luther J. Nussbaum*                         |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |         |   | Luther J. Nussbaum                                |
|   |         |   | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 
| Dated: | May 12, 2003 |   | */s/  Michael J. Puntoriero*                          |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |         |   | Michael J. Puntoriero                                 |
|   |         |   | Executive Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany theReport pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made beforeor after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.

 

----
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

     In connection with the Annual Report of Aearo Company I (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael A. McLain, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

|   |      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Michael A. McLain          Michael A. McLainChairman, Presidentand Chief Executive OfficerNovember 22, 2005

 

----
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant toSection 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Harold C.Bevis, certify that:

1.      I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pliant Corporation;

2.      Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.      Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.      Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

(a)    Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)    Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)    Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.      Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)    Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: August 14, 2006 |                      |
|-----------------------|---------------------------|
|                  |                      |
|                  |                      |
|                  | /s/ HAROLD C.  BEVIS      |
|                  | Harold C. Bevis           |
|                  | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 4.31    
    


Ministry of the Russian Federation for Communications and Informatization  


Supplement No. 2

to license No. 10004 (record series A 009105)

of April 28, 1998  


        The following paragraph shall be added to s. 1 of the "Conditions of activity under license No. 10004": 



        "Within
the scope of this license the licensee may provide cellular radiotelephone communications services of a dual-band (dual-range) network of the
GSM-900/1800 standard with the installation of necessary equipment operating at the frequency ratings allocated in the established manner in the 1800 and 900 MHz bands." 



	First Deputy Minister of the

Russian Federation for

Communications and Informatization	 	[signature]	 	Yu. A. Pavlenko
	
 	
 	

 	
 	

April 7, 2000
	
Deputy Head of the Administration for

Organization of Licensing	
 	
[signature]	
 	
V. N. Ugryumova





[Seal:
Ministry of the Russian Federation for Communications and Informatization] 













QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.31
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Benjamin Garner, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04693

Honorable John Z. Lee

Allstate Insurance Company

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, August 14, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: A Rule 16 initial status hearing

is set for 10/7/20 at 8:45 a.m. The parties are directed to file a joint initial status report by

10/1/20. The report should comply with the requirements for initial joint status reports set

forth in the Initial Status Conference standing order, which can be found on the Court's

website. In light of the COVID−19 pandemic and the related General Orders, the Court

finds that it is necessary to conduct the status hearing via telephone conference. The

call−in number is 888−273−3658 and the access code is 1637578. Counsel of record will

receive a separate email at least 12 hours prior to the start of the telephonic hearing with

instructions on how to join the call. All persons granted remote access to proceedings are

reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting

of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in court−imposed

sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future

hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by

the Court. All participants should review the Court's standing order regarding telephone

conferences that is on Judge Lee's website, which can be found at:

https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge−info.aspx?4Qf5 zc8loCI5U7rfMP9DHw==Mailed

notice(ca, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04693 Document #: 5 Filed: 08/14/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:28
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 62

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Standards of Official

Conduct in the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 13, 1997

Mr. HANSEN (for himself and Mr. BERMAN) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Oversight

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on

Standards of Official Conduct in the One Hundred Fifth

Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Standards of

4 Official Conduct (hereinafter in this resolution referred to

5 as the ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff

6 salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts

7 of the House of Representatives for committee salaries

8 and expenses, not more than $2,439,300 for the One Hun9 dred Fifth Congress.
2

•HRES 62 IH

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

2 Of the amount specified in section 1—

3 (1) not more than $1,237,300 shall be available

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

5 noon on January 3, 1997, and ending immediately

6 before noon on January 3, 1998; and

7 (2) not more than $1,202,000 shall be available

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

9 noon on January 3, 1998, and ending immediately

10 before noon on January 3, 1999.

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner

15 directed by the Committee on House Oversight.

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by

19 the Committee on House Oversight.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

        STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                            UNDER 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350

     We, Charles E. Ramey, the chief executive officer US Dataworks, Inc. (the
"Company"), and John S. Reiland, the chief financial officer of the Company,
certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United
States Code that, to the best of our knowledge,

     (i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB/A, Amendment No. 1
to Form 10-QSB, for the period ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report"), fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: June 10, 2003

                                             /s/ Charles E. Ramey
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Charles E. Ramey
                                             Chief Executive Officer

                                             /s/ John S. Reiland
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             John S. Reiland
                                             Chief Financial Officer

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO US DATAWORKS, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY US DATAWORKS, INC. AND
FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Order entered November 2, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 19

- 01137

- CR
NICHOLAS RYAN NADEAU , Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 29 6 th J udicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296

- 83228

- 2018

O RDER Before the Court is appellant ’ s October 13 , 2021 motion to abate the appeal for a hearing. In the motion , appellant states the appellate r e cord contains
conflictin g rulings on appellant ’ s August 7, 2019 motion to suppress

. Although the trial court signed an order on August 8, 20 19, granting appellant ’ s motion to suppress , the docket she et shows the trial court held a suppression hearing on August 15, 20 19 and denie d the motio n to suppress. T he
reporter ’ s record of the August 15, 2019 hearin g on the motion to suppressconfirm s the trial court denied appellant ’ s motion to supp ress in open court

. D uring
trial , the State offered and the trial court admit ted without obje ction the evidence appellant s ought to suppress. Under these circumstances, w e DENY appellant ’ s motion to abate without prejudice to raising this issue in his brief.
W e DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorab le John
Roach , Jr. , Presidi ng Judge, 296 th Judicial Dis trict Court ; to M aria Tu ; and to the
Collin County District Attorney

.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

Certification  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2001.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of The Havana  Republic,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leonard
Sternheim,  President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  May 19, 2004

                                    /s/ Leonard Sternheim
                                    ----------------------------
                                    Leonard Sternheim, President
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Lester C. Johnson, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FelCorLodging Limited Partnership;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   Date: November 5, 2004 */s/Lester C. Johnson* Lester C. Johnson Principal Financial Officer of FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated, as general partner of FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership