alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-14-00004-CV

ICANUTE ENERGY, INC., AND JOHN A. UPTON, Appellants

V.

RED RIVER ARK-LA-TEX DRILLING, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 5th District Court

Cass County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-C-474

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The appellants, Icanute Energy, Inc., and John A. Upton, have filed a motion seeking to 

dismiss this appeal. Pursuant to Rule 42.1(a)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the 

motion is granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: May 5, 2014

Date Decided: May 6, 2014
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Cogent, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Ming Hsieh, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

This certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,“filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

Date: March 12, 2010
H. Res. 58

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 13, 1997.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and

that they are hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE: Mr. Pallone to rank directly

above Mr. Brown of Ohio.

COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES: Mr. Kind.

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE: Mr. Hall of Texas, Mr. Gordon, Mr. Traficant, Mr. Roemer, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Barcia,

Mr. McHale, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, Mr. Hastings of Florida, Ms. Rivers, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Doggett, Mr.

Doyle, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Mr. Luther, Mr. Capps,

Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Etheridge, Mr. Lampson, and Ms.

Hooley.

Attest:

Clerk.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 612

Expressing unequivocal support for the men and women of our Armed Forces

who are currently carrying out missions in and around the Persian

Gulf region.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 17, 1998

Mr. SPENCE submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing unequivocal support for the men and women of

our Armed Forces who are currently carrying out missions in and around the Persian Gulf region.

Whereas the President of the United States has ordered military action against Iraq in response to its refusal to comply with international obligations under United Nations

Security Council resolutions;

Whereas up to 24,000 men and women of the United States

Armed Forces are presently involved in operations in and

around the Persian Gulf region with the active participation of British Armed Forces and the support of allies in

the region;

Whereas additional United States Armed Forces are being

deployed to the region; and
2

•HRES 612 ATH

Whereas Congress and the American people have the greatest

pride in the men and women of the United States Armed

Forces and strongly support them in their efforts: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, by the House of Representatives that—

2 (1) the Congress unequivocally supports the

3 men and women of our Armed Forces who are carry4 ing out their missions with professionalism, dedica5 tion, patriotism, and courage; and

6 (2) the Congress reaffirms that it should be the

7 policy of the United States to support efforts to re8 move the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from

9 power in Iraq and to promote the emergence of a

10 democratic government to replace that regime.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 12.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Paulo Sergio Kakinoff, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of GOL LINHAS AÉREAS INTELIGENTES S.A.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 30, 2018

By:               /s/ *Paulo Sergio Kakinoff*
### PD-0144-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 2/6/2015 12:43:25 PM Accepted 2/6/2015 3:54:16 PM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERK
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 532

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the President

should personally reimburse the Federal Government for the costs incurred by the Office of Independent Counsel since January 26, 1998.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 11, 1998

Mr. GILLMOR (for himself, Mr. OXLEY, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, Mr. LAHOOD,

Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. PAXON, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr.

SNOWBARGER, Mr. WELLER, and Mr. BALLENGER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

the President should personally reimburse the Federal

Government for the costs incurred by the Office of Independent Counsel since January 26, 1998.

Whereas on January 26, 1998, and on various occasions

thereafter, the President denied having a relationship

with Monica Lewinsky;

Whereas on August 17, 1998, the President acknowledged for

the first time that these denials were false;

Whereas the President’s denials caused the Office of Independent Counsel to incur significant costs investigating

the Monica Lewinsky matter, which would have been
2

•HRES 532 IH

avoided had the President been forthright from the beginning; and

Whereas the costs incurred by the Office of Independent

Counsel since January 26, 1998, should be borne personally by the President, who caused the costs to be incurred, and not by the American taxpayer: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the President should personally reim3 burse the Federal Government for the costs incurred by

4 the Office of Independent Counsel since January 26,

5 1998, because of the President’s untruthfulness and delay.

Æ
Exhibit A – Parties’ Discovery Proposals

Event Plaintiff’s Proposal Defendants’ Proposal 

Written discovery. The parties may serve written discovery 

given that the Court lifted the discovery 

stay on January 17, 2023. The deadline to 

serve written discovery should be 30 days 

prior to the close of fact discovery.

The parties may serve written discovery 

14 days after the lifting of the discovery 

stay. The deadline to serve written 

discovery should be 30 days prior to the 

close of fact discovery.

Deadline to amend pleadings 60 days prior to the close of fact 

discovery.

60 days prior to the close of fact 

discovery.

Completion of fact discovery for class 

certification

Plaintiff opposes bifurcation of “class” 

and “merits” discovery.

August 18, 2023

Completion of fact discovery. December 30, 2024 (except foreign 

discovery provided that it is commenced 

at least 60 days prior to the close of fact 

discovery).

April 1, 2024

Motion for class certification, including 

expert reports

August 30, 2024 September 18, 2023

Defendants’ opposition to class cert and 

supporting expert reports

October 29, 2024 November 17, 2023

Plaintiff’s reply support class cert and 

supporting rebuttal expert reports

December 30, 2024 January 16, 2024

Plaintiff merits expert reports February 28, 2025 May 1, 2024

Defendant merits expert reports April 29, 2025 July 1, 2024

Plaintiff merits rebuttal expert reports June 30, 2025 August 2, 2024

Completion of merits expert discovery. July 30, 2025 October 14, 2024

Motions for summary judgment August 29, 2025 November 18, 2024

Oppositions to summary judgment October 28, 2025 January 13, 2025

Replies in support of summary judgment December 12, 2025 February 12, 2025

Case: 1:20-cv-04577 Document #: 196-1 Filed: 01/20/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2857
#### DWYER v. THURBER

No. 225P97

Case below: 125 N.C.App. 747

Petition by defendant (Mary Caroline Simmons Thurber) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 June 1997.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

| November 12, 2007 | By:    | /s/                                    Harry N. Stout |   |
|-------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| (Date)

     |   |           Harry N. Stout

President

                                                                                                                                              |   |
#### Paul A. LOVINGS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Gene JOHNSON, Director, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 04-7243.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 2004.

Decided Dec. 22, 2004.

Paul A. Lovings, Appellant pro se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Paul A. Lovings seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order* dismissing as time-barred his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lovings has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*

*

The parties consented to jurisdiction of the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Eluid Lira, * From the 259th District Court

of Jones County,

Trial Court No. 012008.

Vs. No. 11-20-00148-CR * March 25, 2021

The State of Texas, * Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Wright, S.C.J., 

sitting by assignment)

(Williams, J., not participating)

Both the opinion and judgment of this court dated March 11, 2021, and entered 

in the minutes of this court at Volume 43 are withdrawn. The opinion and 

judgment of this court dated March 25, 2021, designating the opinion as published,

are substituted therefor.

11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Eluid Lira, * From the 259th District Court

of Jones County,

Trial Court No. 012008.

Vs. No. 11-20-00148-CR * March 25, 2021

The State of Texas, * Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Wright, S.C.J., 

sitting by assignment)

(Williams, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial 

court for further proceedings.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001050117
<NAME> DYNAMIC DETAILS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             841
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,479
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,711)
<INVENTORY>                                     21,391
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,312
<PP&E>                                         110,860
<DEPRECIATION>                                (47,288)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 349,437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,743
<BONDS>                                        349,278
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (79,714)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   349,437
<SALES>                                         75,285
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,285
<CGS>                                           49,035
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,035
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,977
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,264
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,989
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,647
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                342
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       342
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| August 9, 2007 | By:    | /s/                                  David A. Wheat |   |
|----------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| (Date)

  |   | David A. Wheat

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

                                                                                                               |   |

 

 

 

----
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6585

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. RICHARD L. BRYANT, a/k/a Pumpkin, a/k/a Rock , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. ( 2:92

- cr
- 00088

- 6 )

Submitted : September 18, 2020 Decided: October 2, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

.
Richard L. Bryant, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Richard L. Bryant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his “Emergency Motion to Reopen Petition Under First Step Act of 2018 Based on Extraordinary and Compelling Circumstances Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(1)(A)(i).” This court may exercise jurisdiction only over fin al orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). “Ordinarily, a district court order is not final until it
has resolv ed all claims as to all parties.” Porter v. Zook , 803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted). Our review of the record reveals that the district court did not adjudicate all of the
claims raised in Bryant’s motion. Id. at 696

- 97 . Specifically, the court failed to address Bryant’s claim that his heightened susceptibility to COVID

- 19 is an extraordinary and compelling reason justifying compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i).
We conclude that the order Bryant see ks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction
and remand to the district court for consideration of the unresolved clai m. Id. at 699. We
express no view as to the merits of the claim. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 68682]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27241]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL15-4-000]


Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Company; Notice of Supplement To 
Petition for Declaratory Order

    Take notice that on November 7, 2014, Trans-Allegheny Interstate 
Line Company filed clarifications to its petition for declaratory 
regarding pay of dividends out of paid-in capital, filed on October 7, 
2014.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Petitioner.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistancewith any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a9efecfbeae6c7c5c0c7ccfadcd9d9c6dbdde9cfccdbca87cec6df"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2e686b7c6d61404247404b7d5b5e5e415c5a6e484b5c4d00494158">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on November 17, 2014.

    Dated: November 10, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-27241 Filed 11-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>