Bob Bacon

Democratic

Mark Brophy

Libertarian

Kevin Lundberg

Republican

Doug Frisbie

Democratic

Alberto Squassabia

Libertarian

STATE REPRESENTATIVE -

DISTRICT 49

(Vote for One)

James E. Welker

Republican

Write-in

STATE REPRESENTATIVE -

DISTRICT 51

(Vote for One)

John Kefalas

Democratic

Bob McCluskey

Republican

Jassen L. Bowman

Libertarian

STATE REPRESENTATIVE -

DISTRICT 52

(Vote for One)

Angie Paccione

Democratic

Ed Haynes

Republican

STATE REPRESENTATIVE -

DISTRICT 53

(Vote for One)

Michael Anthony Peroutka / Chuck Baldwin

American Constitution

Gene Amondson / Leroy Pletten

Concerns of People

Stanford E. Andress (Andy) / Irene M. Deasy

Unaffiliated

Walter F. Brown / Mary Cal Hollis

Socialist

Earl F. Dodge / Howard L. Lydick

Prohibition

James E. Harris / Margaret Trowe

Socialist Workers

Bill Van Auken / Jim Lawrence

Socialist Equality

Write-in

Steve Gillette

Douglas Klink

Pete Brandjord

Bob Cheney

(Vote fo

Jim Watson

Fred Garrabrant

Jack Rumley

Steve Campbell

DI

FOUR 

(Vote fo

RED FE

FIRE PROT

Dean VanBuskirk

Karen Rudisaile

Boar

(Vote for 

Larry R. Abrahamson

Republican

DISTRICT ATTORNEY -

8th JUDICIAL DISTRICT

(Vote for One)

JU

YES

NO

COURT 

(Vot

Shall Judge James S. C

Appeals be retained in o

YES

NO

COURT 

(Vot

Shall Judge Dennis A. G

Appeals be retained in o

COUNTY OFFICES

Karen A. Wagner

Democratic

Tom Bender

Republican

COUNTY COMMISSIONER - DISTRICT 2

(Vote for One)

Roger Hoffmann

Democratic

Glenn Gibson

Republican

COUNTY COMMISSIONER - DISTRICT 3

(Vote for One)

Pete Coors

Republican

Ken Salazar

Democratic

Victor Good

Colorado Reform

Douglas "Dayhorse" Campbell

American Constitution

Richard Randall

Libertarian

John R. Harris

Independent

Finn Gotaas

Unaffiliated

Write-in

UNITED STATES SENATOR

(Vote for One)

Marilyn N. Musgrave

Republican

Stan Matsunaka

Democratic

Bob Kinsey

Green

REPRESENTATIVE TO THE 109th

UNITED STATES CONGRESS -

DISTRICT 4

(Vote for One)

STATE OFFICES

Jennifer Mello

Democratic

Steve Bosley

Republican

Daniel Ong

Libertarian

REGENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO -

AT LARGE

(Vote for One)

FRONT Card 1 SEQ# 1
YES

NO

COUNTY JUDGE - LARIMER

(Vote Yes or No)

Shall Judge Christine A. Carney of the Larimer County Court

be retained in office?

YES

NO

COUNTY JUDGE - LARIMER

(Vote Yes or No)

Shall Judge Ronald L. Schultz of the Larimer County Court be

retained in office?

STATE OF COLORADO

YES

NO

Amendment 34

Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado constitution

concerning recovery of damages relating to construction of

real property improvements, and, in connection therewith,

prohibiting laws that limit or impair a property owner's right to

recover damages caused by a failure to construct an

improvement in a good and workmanlike manner; defining

"good and workmanlike manner" to include construction that is

suitable for its intended purposes; and permitting exceptions

for laws that limit punitive damages, afford governmental

immunity, or impose time limits of specified minimum lengths

on filing lawsuits?

YES

NO

Amendment 36

Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado constitution

concerning popular proportional selection of presidential

electors, and, in connection therewith, creating procedures for

allocating Colorado's electoral votes for president and vicepresident of the United States, based on the proportion of

ballots that are cast in this state for each presidential ticket;

making the terms of the proposed amendment effective so

that popular proportional selection of presidential electors

applies to the 2004 general election; setting forth procedures

and timelines that govern the certification of election results

and the potential recounting of votes in elections for

presidential electors and in the election on this proposed

amendment; granting the Colorado supreme court original

jurisdiction for the adjudication of all contests concerning

presidential electors and requiring that such matters be heard

and decided on an expedited basis; and authorizing the

general assembly to enact legislation to change the manner of

selecting presidential electors or any of the procedures

contained in this amendment?

YES

NO

DISTRICT JUDGE - 8th JUDICIAL DISTRICT

(Vote Yes or No)

Shall Judge Daniel J. Kaup of the 8th Judicial District be

retained in office?

YES

NO

DISTRICT JUDGE - 8th JUDICIAL DISTRICT

(Vote Yes or No)

Shall Judge Terence A. Gilmore of the 8th Judicial District be

retained in office?

YES

NO

retained in office?

YES

NO

TWOTHIRDS OF THE MEMBERS OF EACH HOUSE OF

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND THE GOVERNOR;

PROHIBITING THE REPEAL OR REDUCTION OF EXISTING

TAXES IMPOSED ON CIGARETTES AND OTHER

TOBACCO PRODUCTS; EXCLUDING ALL ADDITIONAL

TOBACCO TAX REVENUES FROM FISCAL YEAR

SPENDING FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 20 OF ARTICLE

X OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION; AND EXEMPTING

APPROPRIATIONS OF ADDITIONAL TOBACCO TAX

REVENUES FROM THE STATUTORY LIMITATION ON

GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS GROWTH OR ANY

OTHER EXISTING SPENDING LIMITATION?

YES

NO

BALLOT TO INCREAS

NUMBER OF THE LAR

COMMISSIONERS TO 

1. SHALL LARIMER CO

INCREASED $250,682.

PURPOSE OF FUNDIN

POSITIONS OF TWO A

COMMISSIONERS BY 

ADDITIONAL 0.082 MIL

SHALL ALL REVENUE

COLLECTED, RETAINE

COUNTY IN PERPETU

EXCEED THE 5.5% TA

LIMITATION CONTAIN

COLORADO REVISED 

TAX REVENUE LIMITA

SECTION 20 OF THE C

STATE OF COLORADO

Further, shall the memb

Commissioners of Larim

three (3) to five (5) mem

YES

NO

Amendment 37

Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado revised statutes

concerning renewable energy standards for large providers of

retail electric service, and, in connection therewith, defining

eligible renewable energy resources to include solar, wind,

geothermal, biomass, small hydroelectricity, and hydrogen fuel

cells; requiring that a percentage of retail electricity sales be

derived from renewable sources, beginning with 3% in the

year 2007 and increasing to 10% by 2015; requiring utilities to

offer customers a rebate of $2.00 per watt and other

incentives for solar electric generation; providing incentives for

utilities to invest in renewable energy resources that provide

net economic benefits to customers; limiting the retail rate

impact of renewable energy resources to 50 cents per month

for residential customers; requiring public utilities commission

rules to establish major aspects of the measure; prohibiting

utilities from using condemnation or eminent domain to

acquire land for generating facilities used to meet the

standards; requiring utilities with requirements contracts to

address shortfalls from the standards; and specifying election

procedures by which the customers of a utility may opt out of

the requirements of this amendment?

A. The Board of Co

Larimer County sha

to five (5) members 

(5) districts and wh

from the entire cou

B. The Board of Co

Larimer County sha

to five (5) members

residents of three (

elected by voters o

at large members w

of the entire county

C. The Board of Co

Larimer County sha

to five (5) members

residents of district

only by voters resid

the member runs fo

whom shall be elec

county.

2. If the electors vote to 

Commissioners to five (

which receives the most 

Commissioners. Regar

or “no” on whether to inc

number of commissione

method to elect commis

BACK Card 1 SEQ# 1
YES

NO

AMOUNTS SUFFICIENT TO PRODUCE THE ANNUAL

INCREASE SET FORTH ABOVE, AND SHALL THE

REVENUES RECEIVED FROM SUCH INCREASED MILL

LEVY, AND ANY EARNINGS FROM THE INVESTMENT OF

SUCH REVENUES, BE RECEIVED, INVESTED, AND

SPENT BY THE DISTRICT IN ANY YEAR WITHOUT

REGARD TO ANY SPENDING, REVENUE-RAISING, OR

OTHER LIMITATION IMPOSED BY, OR CONTAINED IN,

ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO

CONSTITUTION, SUCH AMOUNTS TO CONSTITUTE A

VOTER APPROVED WAIVER OF SUCH LIMITATIONS?

ESTES PARK FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

YES

NO

REFERRED 5A

“SHALL THE ESTES PARK FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

TAXES BE INCREASED $843,500 ANNUALLY IN THE

FIRST FULL FISCAL YEAR AND BY WHATEVER

ADDITIONAL AMOUNTS ARE RAISED ANNUALLY IN EACH

SUBSEQUENT YEAR BY THE IMPOSITION OF A MILL

LEVY NOT TO EXCEED THREE AND ONE-HALF (3.5)

MILLS UPON TAXABLE REAL AND PERSONAL

PROPERTY WITHIN THE DISTRICT, COMMENCING WITH

THE TAX COLLECTION YEAR 2005, AND CONTINUING

THEREAFTER; AND SHALL THE DISTRICT BE

AUTHORIZED TO COLLECT, KEEP AND SPEND ALL

REVENUES RECEIVED IN 2005 AND EACH YEAR

THEREAFTER WITHOUT REGARD TO ANY SPENDING,

REVENUE, OR OTHER LIMITATION IN ARTICLE X,

SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION OR

OTHER STATUTORY LAWS OF THE STATE OF

COLORADO; AND SHALL THE ESTES PARK FIRE

PROTECTION DISTRICT BE ORGANIZED AS A SPECIAL

DISTRICT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE I OF TITLE 32 C.R.S.

AND PURSUANT TO ITS SERVICE PLAN?”

YES

NO

POUDRE OVERLOOK PID # 30

REFERRED 5C

SHALL THE PROPOSED POUDRE OVERLOOK PUBLIC

IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT #30 TAXES BE INCREASED

$40,000 ANNUALLY, OR BY SUCH LESSER AMOUNT AS

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MAY ANNUALLY

DETERMINE IS NECESSARY TO PAY DISTRICT

OPERATIONAL COSTS AND TO PAY THE COSTS OF

CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION AND CONTINUED

MAINTENANCE OF ROADS WITHIN THE DISTRICT, SUCH

TAXES TO CONSIST OF AN AD VALOREM MILL LEVY

IMPOSED WITHOUT LIMITATION OF RATE OR WITH

SUCH LIMITATIONS AS MAY BE DETERMINED BY THE

BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE DISTRICT, AND SHALL

THE PROCEEDS OF SUCH TAXES AND INVESTMENT

INCOME THEREON BE COLLECTED AND SPENT BY THE

DISTRICT AS A VOTER-APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE

IN 2005 AND IN EACH YEAR THEREAFTER, WITHOUT

REGARD TO ANY SPENDING, REVENUE-RAISING, OR

OTHER LIMITATION CONTAINED WITHIN ARTICLE X,

SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION, OR

SECTION 29-1-301, COLORADO REVISED STATUTES,

AND WITHOUT LIMITING IN ANY YEAR THE AMOUNT OF

OTHER REVENUES THAT MAY BE COLLECTED AND

SPENT BY THE DISTRICT AND SHALL THE POUDRE

OVERLOOK PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 30 BE

CREATED?

YES

NO

SHIREB

RE

ORGANIZATION:

Shall Larimer County Sh

District No. 27 be organ

YES

NO

OF THE DISTRICT, WIT

OR WITH SUCH LIMITA

DETERMINED BY THE 

ASSESSMENTS, AND 

PRODUCE THE ANNU

ABOVE OR SUCH LES

NECESSARY, TO BE U

PURPOSE OF PAYING 

PREMIUM, IF ANY, AN

DISTRICT'S DEBT; SU

SERIES OR MORE AT 

EQUAL TO THE PRINC

DEBT AND ON SUCH T

THE DISTRICT MAY D

PROVISIONS FOR RED

PRIOR TO MATURITY 

OF PREMIUM OF NOT 

THE PROCEEDS OF A

PROCEEDS OF SUCH 

REVENUE USED TO P

INVESTMENT INCOME 

AND SPENT BY THE D

APPROVED REVENUE 

REGARD TO ANY SPE

OR OTHER LIMITATIO

ARTICLE X, SECTION 

CONSTITUTION AND 

YEAR THE AMOUNT O

MAY BE COLLECTED A

DISTRICT?

YES

NO

SHIREBROOK PID # 27

REFERRED 5D

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MILL LEVY:

SHALL LARIMER COUNTY SHIREBROOK PUBLIC

IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 27 TAXES BE INCREASED

$2,000 ANNUALLY, OR BY SUCH LESSER ANNUAL

AMOUNT AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO PAY THE

DISTRICT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, AND OTHER

EXPENSES: SUCH TAXES TO CONSIST OF AN AD

VALOREM MILL LEVY IMPOSED WITHOUT LIMITATION OF

RATE OR WITH SUCH LIMITATIONS AS MAY BE

DETERMINED BY THE BOARD, AND IN AMOUNTS

SUFFICIENT TO PRODUCE THE ANNUAL INCREASE SET

FORTH ABOVE OR SUCH LESSER AMOUNT AS MAY BE

NECESSARY, TO BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE OF

PAYING THE DISTRICT OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE,

AND OTHER EXPENSES; AND SHALL THE PROCEEDS

OF SUCH TAXES AND INVESTMENT INCOME THEREON

BE COLLECTED AND SPENT BY THE DISTRICT AS A

VOTER-APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE IN 2005 AND IN

EACH YEAR THEREAFTER, WITHOUT REGARD TO ANY

SPENDING, REVENUE-RAISING, OR OTHER LIMITATION

CONTAINED WITHIN ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE

COLORADO CONSTITUTION, OR SECTION 29-1-301,

COLORADO REVISED STATUTES?

FRONT Card 2 SEQ# 1
ESTES VALLEY PU

YES

NO

IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT #28 TAXES BE INCREASED

$10,000 ANNUALLY, OR BY SUCH LESSER AMOUNT AS

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MAY ANNUALLY

DETERMINE IS NECESSARY TO PAY DISTRICT

OPERATIONAL COSTS AND TO PAY THE COSTS OF

CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION AND CONTINUED

MAINTENANCE OF ROADS WITHIN THE DISTRICT, SUCH

TAXES TO CONSIST OF AN AD VALOREM MILL LEVY

IMPOSED WITHOUT LIMITATION OF RATE OR WITH

SUCH LIMITATIONS AS MAY BE DETERMINED BY THE

BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE DISTRICT, AND SHALL

THE PROCEEDS OF SUCH TAXES AND INVESTMENT

INCOME THEREON BE COLLECTED AND SPENT BY THE

DISTRICT AS A VOTER-APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE

IN 2005 AND IN EACH YEAR THEREAFTER, WITHOUT

REGARD TO ANY SPENDING, REVENUE-RAISING, OR

OTHER LIMITATION CONTAINED WITHIN ARTICLE X,

SECTION 20 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION, OR

SECTION 29-1-301, COLORADO REVISED STATUTES,

AND WITHOUT LIMITING IN ANY YEAR THE AMOUNT OF

OTHER REVENUES THAT MAY BE COLLECTED AND

SPENT BY THE DISTRICT AND SHALL THE TROTWOOD

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 28 BE CREATED?

YES

NO

VINE DRIVE PID # 29

REFERRED 5I

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MILL LEVY:

SHALL LARIMER COUNTY VINE DRIVE PUBLIC

IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 29 TAXES BE INCREASED

$5,000 ANNUALLY, OR BY SUCH LESSER ANNUAL

AMOUNT AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO PAY THE

DISTRICT=S OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, AND OTHER

EXPENSES: SUCH TAXES TO CONSIST OF AN AD

VALOREM MILL LEVY IMPOSED WITHOUT LIMITATION OF

RATE OR WITH SUCH LIMITATIONS AS MAY BE

DETERMINED BY THE BOARD, AND IN AMOUNTS

SUFFICIENT TO PRODUCE THE ANNUAL INCREASE SET

FORTH ABOVE OR SUCH LESSER AMOUNT AS MAY BE

NECESSARY, TO BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE OF

PAYING THE DISTRICT=S OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE,

AND OTHER EXPENSES; AND SHALL THE PROCEEDS

OF SUCH TAXES AND INVESTMENT INCOME THEREON

BE COLLECTED AND SPENT BY THE DISTRICT AS A

VOTER-APPROVED REVENUE CHANGE IN 2005 AND IN

EACH YEAR THEREAFTER, WITHOUT REGARD TO ANY

SPENDING, REVENUE-RAISING, OR OTHER LIMITATION

CONTAINED WITHIN ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE

COLORADO CONSTITUTION, OR SECTION 29-1-301,

COLORADO REVISED STATUTES?

YES

NO

VINE DRIVE PID # 29

REFERRED 5K

ORGANIZATION:

Shall Larimer County Vine Drive Public Improvement District

No. 29 be organized?

YES

NO

SUCH LIMITATIONS AS MAY BE DETERMINED BY THE

BOARD OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS, AND IN AMOUNTS

SUFFICIENT TO PRODUCE THE ANNUAL INCREASE SET

FORTH ABOVE OR SUCH LESSER AMOUNT AS MAY BE

NECESSARY, TO BE USED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE

OF PAYING THE PRINCIPAL OF, PREMIUM, IF ANY, AND

INTEREST ON THE DISTRICT’S DEBT; SUCH DEBT TO BE

SOLD IN ONE SERIES OR MORE AT A PRICE ABOVE,

BELOW OR EQUAL TO THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF

SUCH DEBT AND ON SUCH TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS

THE DISTRICT MAY DETERMINE, INCLUDING

PROVISIONS FOR REDEMPTION OF THE DEBT PRIOR TO

MATURITY WITH OR WITHOUT PAYMENT OF PREMIUM

OF NOT TO EXCEED 3%; AND SHALL THE PROCEEDS OF

ANY SUCH DEBT AND THE PROCEEDS OF SUCH TAXES,

ANY OTHER REVENUE USED TO PAY SUCH DEBT, AND

INVESTMENT INCOME THEREON, BE COLLECTED AND

SPENT BY THE DISTRICT AS A VOTER-APPROVED

REVENUE CHANGE, WITHOUT REGARD TO ANY

SPENDING, REVENUE-RAISING OR OTHER LIMITATION

CONTAINED WITHIN ARTICLE X, SECTION 20 OF THE

COLORADO CONSTITUTION AND WITHOUT LIMITING IN

ANY YEAR THE AMOUNT OF OTHER REVENUES THAT

MAY BE COLLECTED AND SPENT BY THE DISTRICT?

YES

NO

REF

ESTES VALLEY PUBLI

OPERATION AND MAI

QUESTION:

SHALL LARIMER COU

VALLEY PUBLIC LIBRA

INCREASED BY $265,0

REVENUES IN THE YE

ADDITIONAL AMOUNT

THEREAFTER BY INC

DISTRICT MILL LEVY B

3.28 MILLS FOR THE P

EXPENSES OF THE M

OPERATION OF THE E

LIBRARY DISTRICT; A

OF SUCH TAX INCREA

THEREAFTER BE COL

REGARDLESS OF THE 

29-1-301, C.R.S.; AND 

RECEIVED BY THE DIS

INCREASE BE COLLEC

LIMITATION OR COND

AFFECTING THE COLL

ANY OTHER COUNTY 

UNDER ARTICLE X, SE

COLORADO CONSTIT

END OF BALLOT 

BACK Card 2 SEQ# 1