alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Continuing Education Units

VERIFICATION OF ATTENDANCE FORM

Certification Number:________________

 attended the following professional educational activity. 

(NAME)

Title: Cybersecurity Framework Workshop 2017 

Date(s): May 16 & 17, 2017 CEU Hours Earned: 13 hrs 

Sponsor(s): National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and NIST ITL Applied Cybersecurity Division 

Explanation of Event: Approximately 200 information systems security professionals and trainers attend from federal 

agencies, academia, foreign agencies, and industry representatives from organizations that support federal information 

systems and security programs. Presenters represent OMB, DoD, HHS, CMS, NIST, DHS, NSA, IRS, USPS, private 

industry and academia. 

Traditional FISSEA conference events include announcing the winners of FISSEA security contests and announcing the 

FISSEA Educator of the Year. The Educator of the Year Award was established to recognize and honor a contemporary who 

is making special efforts to create, build, manage, or inspire an information systems security awareness, training, or 

education program. The FISSEA Security Awareness, Training & Education Contest includes six categories (posters, videos, 

websites, motivational items, newsletters, and training scenarios.

Location: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899

Name of Meeting Chair: Matt Barrett, NIST, ITL Applied Cybersecurity Division

 

Contact Information:

http://www.nist.gov/cyberframework

cyberframework@nist.gov

The Continuing Education Units form is provided as a courtesy. It is the responsibility of the 

attendee to complete and submit with their certifying authority.
The mathematics exercises are used to evaluate prospective participants of the NIST Office of Weights 

and Measures (OWM) Fundamentals of Metrology seminar because a minimum level of mathematics 

skills are required to be successful in the seminar. Successful completion of the exercises provides NIST 

OWM staff with a level of confidence that the prospective participant possesses those mathematical 

skills. Completed mathematical exercises are graded and feedback is provided to the prospective 

seminar participant so that refresher training can be obtained to bolster any weak areas that are 

identified. A metrologist, regardless of the specific measurement discipline, must perform a wide variety 

of mathematical calculations to provide their customer with a measurement result and uncertainty 

based on the measurement equation. The expectation of a metrologist is that they provide the correct 

answer 100 % of the time. To successfully complete the mathematics exercises and achieve approval to 

participate in the Fundamentals of Metrology Seminar, the participant must achieve a score of at least 

70 % correct.

The mathematics exercises evaluate skills in the following areas:

• Orders of Operations, Powers and Roots

• Positive and Negative Numbers

• Metrology Related Examples (using typical measurement equations and variables)

• Units, Conversions and related Problems.

Each of these skills are extremely important to the field of metrology.
EXHIBIT 32.2NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.CERTIFICATIONIn connection with the periodic report of Novellus Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),I, William H. Kurtz, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of theUnited States Code, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for theperiods indicated.This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and ExchangeCommission.              Dated: August 7, 2007 By: /s/ William H. Kurtz             William H. Kurtz      Executive Vice President and Chief      Financial Officer      (Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 10 

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 126-10 Filed: 03/01/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:2343
Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 126-10 Filed: 03/01/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:2344
#### SHAW v. SMITH

No. 151P97

Case below: 125 N.C.App. 616

Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 May 1997. Petition by defendants for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 8 May 1997.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

Selene Danielle Arriaga, 

 Plaintiff,

)

)

)

)

)

v. )

)

Case No: 20-cv-4498

Thomas J. Dart, Sheriff of Cook County, Illinois; 

The Northeast Regional Commuter Railroad 

Corporation d/b/a Metra; Cook County, Illinois; 

Marie Rangel, Joseph Perez; Paul Riggio; David 

Cammack; Theodore Stajura; and Timothy 

O’Donnell,

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

The Honorable Judge Virginia Kendall

Presiding

Magistrate Judge Maria Valdez

COOK COUNTY DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6), Defendants, Thomas J. 

Dart, Sheriff of Cook County, Cook County, Maria Rangel, David Cammack, Theodore Stajura, 

and Timothy O’Donnell (“Cook County Defendants”), by their attorney, Kimberly M. Foxx, 

Cook County State’s Attorney, through her assistant, Nazia Hasan, submit this Motion to 

Dismiss Plaintiff Selene Danielle Arriaga’s Complaint. 

In support of this Motion, Cook County Defendants rely on their contemporaneously 

filed Memorandum of Law in Support of their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint for 

failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

Date: November 2, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

KIMBERLY M. FOXX

State's Attorney of Cook County

By: /s/ Nazia Hasan

Assistant State's Attorney

Case: 1:20-cv-04498 Document #: 30 Filed: 11/02/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:131
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on November 2, 2020, she electronically filed the 

foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court for the Northern District of Illinois by using the 

CM/ECF system. All participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users who will be served by 

the CM/ECF system pursuant to Rule 5(b)(2)(E) and LR 5.9.

By: /s/ Nazia Hasan

Assistant State's Attorney

500 Richard J. Daley Center

Chicago, Illinois 60602

(312) 603-3618

Nazia.Hasan@cookcountyil.gov

Case: 1:20-cv-04498 Document #: 30 Filed: 11/02/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:132
MEP Advisory Board Meeting 

AGENDA

September 11-12, 2018

Kansas City Marriott Downtown

200 W. 12th Street

Kansas City, MO 64105

Wednesday, September 12, 2018

2:00 p.m.–2:05 p.m.

5 minutes

Meeting Logistics • Cheryl Gendron, NIST MEP 

2:05 p.m.–2:30 p.m.

25 minutes

Welcome and Introductions:

• Opening Remarks

• Welcome from NIST Leadership

• Board and Audience Introductions

• Jeffrey Wilcox, Chair, MEP Advisory 

Board 

• Phil Singerman, Ph.D., NIST 

Innovation and Industry Services

• Carroll Thomas, NIST MEP

2:30 p.m.–3:00 p.m.

30 minutes

MEP National Network Strategic Plan and 

MEP National Network Update

Board Feedback & Discussion

• Carroll Thomas, NIST MEP

3:00 p.m.–3:30 p.m.

30 minutes

Working Group Update:

• Performance/Research Development 

Working Group

Board Feedback & Discussion

• Leslie Taito, MEP Advisory Board

Ken Voytek, NIST MEP

3:30 p.m.–3:45 p.m.

15 minutes

Meeting Break 

3:45 p.m.–4:15 p.m.

30 minutes

Government Accountability Office (GAO) 

Cost Share Report

Board Feedback & Discussion

• Carroll Thomas, NIST MEP

4:15 p.m.–4:55 p.m.

40 minutes

Working Group Update:

• Supply Chain Development Working 

Group

Board Feedback & Discussion

• Matt Newman, MEP Advisory Board

• Dave Stieren, NIST MEP

4:55 p.m.–5:15 p.m.

20 minutes

Working Group Update:

• Executive Committee Working Group

Board Feedback & Discussion

• Jeffrey Wilcox, Chair, MEP Advisory 

Board

• Bernadine Hawes, Vice-Chair, MEP 

Advisory Board 

• Cheryl Gendron, NIST MEP

5:15 p.m.–5:30 p.m.

15 minutes

Wrap-up/Public Comments • Jeffrey Wilcox, Chair, MEP Advisory 

Board

• Carroll Thomas, NIST MEP

*Non-FACA Items

All times are subject to change.

Rev. 9/10/2018

Registration: This meeting is open to the public and free of charge. Pre-registration is 

required. To attend please submit your name, company/organization, email address 

and phone number to Cheryl Gendron (Cheryl.Gendron@nist.gov or 301-975-2785) 

no later than Friday, September 7, 2018, 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time. 

The MEP National Network Meeting requires separate registration; please visit the 

meeting information page for additional information: https://tinyurl.com/MEPNNUpdate2018
Exhibit 3 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 354-3 Filed: 08/09/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:8199
	

	
	
  !"#$

%&'(&'( )*+,-.'	,/01
	

2345665789:;/;<=>



?@AB,C#



@

0,	DE
	,/;F&,D0,G,&0		,CAH'D6&:
,
I&

,G,&?	&J&&
,	:0		,CAH'D6&:,&0,	DE
KL
&	&&	
/CM'





AFC',/,CM'
D
:
,
&
	,,



8	C:



	

	




NOPQRSTUOVPWQXXR

YZZ[\]^_YZ`ab

cdefghijklmnloplqrshitpruvued

wQPVxSwQyz{|u|}dv~}d|ucoy{d}cd}uveoyQz{mmsl}s TRXVzVRoVTPoNOQxyToyROQzzVoyROQXSTXwNyXPyXxQRxTWVQQXoTXTXozTVxT

 ¡¢£¤¥¡¦£§ ̈£¦©¡ ¦£¥a¦«¬­® ̄°±¬23 ́±μ­°¬­­¬¶μ·±μ ̧±μ1 ̧¶o»°®μ3­·1⁄4¬2®­¶ ́1⁄2 ́®3⁄4¬¶»­® ̄°±¬2°®­­±¿®­±33±o«® ̧3¶¬3°±1

o¶μ3±¬μo¶μ1⁄4¬ ̧®μ3¬±2¬μ1⁄4¶ ́°±3¬¶μ3«±3¬­2®¿±2211⁄2 ́¬3⁄4¬2®¿® ̧À£1⁄41¶»± ́®μ¶33«®¬μ3®μ ̧® ̧ ́®o¬1⁄2¬®μ3·¶ ́±1⁄2® ́­¶μ ́®­1⁄2¶μ­¬Á2®1⁄4¶ ́ ̧®2¬3⁄4® ́¬μ¿

¬33¶3«®¬μ3®μ ̧® ̧ ́®o¬1⁄2¬®μ3·1¶»± ́®«® ́®Á1μ¶3¬1⁄4¬® ̧3«±3±μ1 ̧¬­o2¶­» ́®·o¶1⁄21¬μ¿· ̧¬­3 ́¬Á»3¬¶μ¶ ́»­®¶1⁄4±μ1¶1⁄43«®¬μ1⁄4¶ ́°±3¬¶μ

o¶μ3±¬μ® ̧¬μ¶ ́±33±o«® ̧3¶3«¬­3 ́±μ­°¬­­¬¶μ¬­Â¦Ã£¦ ̈©ÄÃ Å£Æ£¦¥¤À£1⁄41¶»«±3⁄4® ́®o®¬3⁄4® ̧3«¬­3 ́±μ­°¬­­¬¶μ¬μ® ́ ́¶ ́·1⁄22®±­®

¬°°® ̧¬±3®21μ¶3¬1⁄413«®­®μ ̧® ́ÀÄ2®±­® ̧®­3 ́¶13«®¶ ́¬¿¬μ±23 ́±μ­°¬­­¬¶μ±μ ̧¬3­±33±o«°®μ3­Ç¬3«¶»3 ́®± ̧¬μ¿¶ ́­±3⁄4¬μ¿¬μ±μ1

°±μμ® ́À¦«±μÈ1¶»· ̈¶®ÁÉ ̈¶®Á ̈ ̈ÄÀ

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 354-3 Filed: 08/09/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:8200
10226.

#### North Georgia Banking Co. *v.*Fancher *et al.*

Jenkins, J.

1. The rule as to service on corporations in cases of garnishment is not the same as in ordinary suits against them. *Burnett*v. *Central of Georgia Ry. Co.,*117 *Ga.*521, 522 (43 S. E. 854, 97 Am. St. R. 175),-citing *Clark*v. *Chapman,*45 *Ga.*488. It was formerly the rule that service of a summons of garnishment upon a domestic corporation could only be made upon its president, residing in this State. *Steiner*v. *Central Railroad,*60 *Ga.*552; *Brigham*v. *Port Royal & Augusta Ry.,*74 *Ga.*365. By section 5270 of the Civil Code of 1910 (taken from the act of 1885) it is provided that “Service of a summons of garnishment upon the agent in charge of the office or business of the corporation” shall be sufficient, and it has been held,'as requisite to a legal entry of service under this provision, that the return must indicate that the corporation itself had been served *(Burnett*v. *Central of Georgia Ry. Co.,*supra), and that the person representing the company in such service was the agent in charge of the office or business *(Southern Railway Co.*v. *Hagan,*103 *Ga.*564, 29 S. E. 760; *Holbrook*v. *Evansville & Terre Haute R. Co.,*114 *Ga.*1, 4, 39 S. E. 937); the only qualification of the last-stated requirement being where the return indicates that the specified official is such as must be taken to be, prima facie and as a matter of law, the alter ego of the corporation by virtue of such office. *Third Rational Bank*v. *McCullough,*108 *Ga.*249 (33 S. E. 848).

2. The president of a chartered bank, being its alter ego, is the person who is presumptively, as a matter of law, in charge of its office and business, under the meaning of section 5270 of the Civil Code of 1910, relating to service of summons of garnishment upon corporations. *Third Rational Bank*v. *McCullough,*supra; *Park*v. *Cordray,*20 *Ga. App. 35*(92 S. E. 394). Thus, a returnwhich shows that service of a summons of garnishment was made upon the bank by serving the named cashier thereof, but which does not indicate, either as originally made or by *684amendment *(Southern Express Co.*v. *National Bank,*4 *Ga. App.*399, 61 S. E. 857), that he was actually the agent in charge of its office or business, is not sufficient to be the basis of a judgment by default against the bank.

Decided April 23, 1919.

Garnishment; from Whitfield, superior court—Judge Tarver. October 8, 1918.-

*J. J. Copeland, W. E.*Mann, for plaintiff in error.

*F. K. McCutchen,*contra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*"Wade, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

LARRY JONES, a/k/a “Lil Larry”

Case No. 20 CR 309-1

Judge Virginia M. Kendall

INFORMATION STATING PREVIOUS CONVICTION 

TO BE RELIED UPON IN SEEKING INCREASED PUNISHMENT

The United States of America, by its attorney, John R. Lausch, Jr., United 

States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, hereby files this Information 

Stating Previous Conviction to Be Relied Upon in Seeking Increased Punishment 

pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 851(a). 

In the event the defendant LARRY JONES is convicted of an offense under 

Title 21, United States Code, Sections 841(a)(1) and 846, as charged in Counts 1 and 

8-9 of the Indictment in this case, the United States shall seek increased punishment 

pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 841(b) based upon the following 

conviction for a serious violent felony, as defined in Title 21, United States Code, 

Section 802(58):

Before the defendant committed the offenses charged in Counts 1 and 8-9 of 

the Indictment in this case, the defendant had a final conviction for a serious violent

felony, namely, a conviction in Case Number 97 CR 1538201 (Circuit Court of Cook 

County, Illinois) for attempted murder, in violation of 720 ILCS 5/9-1(a)(1), for which 

he served more than 12 months of imprisonment. 
2

WHEREFORE, the government gives notice that defendant has at least one 

prior conviction for a serious violent felony, and thus:

(a) The sentence upon his conviction for the offense under Title 21, United 

States Code, Sections 841(a)(1) and 846 charged in Count 1 of the Indictment in this 

case shall include a term of imprisonment of not less than 10 years and not more than 

life, a fine not to exceed $8,000,000, and a term of supervised release of at least 

8 years up to and including any number of years, including life, pursuant to Title 21, 

United States Code, Section 841(b)(1)(B).

(b) The sentence upon his conviction for the offenses under Title 21, United 

States Code, Section 841(a)(1) charged in Counts 8-9 of the Indictment in this case 

shall include a term of imprisonment of not more than 30 years, a fine not to exceed 

$2,000,000, and a term of supervised release of at least 6 years up to and including 

any number of years, including life, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 

841(b)(1)(C).

Dated: July 13, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. LAUSCH, JR.

United States Attorney

By: /s/ Grayson Sang Walker 

JOHN D. MITCHELL

GRAYSON SANG WALKER

Assistant United States Attorneys

United States Attorney’s Office

219 South Dearborn, 5th Floor

Chicago, Illinois 60604

(312) 353-5300
2021 Expert and Consultant Daily Wages

Based on the OPM Salary Table 2021-GS

Effective January 3, 2021

The following is a table of compensation rates for Experts and Consultants identifying per diem rates based on the first and the tenth 

step of GS-13, GS-14, and GS-15. As in the past, we suggest the use of a rate that equates to the first step of the appropriate grade. 

With supporting documentation, a higher rate may be justified to match the private sector salary of the appointee.

 Daily Daily

Per Diem Salary Scale Minimum Maximum

GS-13 range $79,468 - $103,309 $304.64 $396.00

GS-14 range $93,907 - $122,077 $360.00 $467.92

GS-15 range $110,460 - $143,598 $423.44 $550.48

NOTE: The process of increasing the pay of an Expert or Consultant is not automatic and requires the submission of a Request for 

Personnel Action, SF-52.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 223 (Wednesday, November 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 68951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27471]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


In the Matter of YesDTC Holdings, Inc.; Order of Suspension of 
Trading

November 17, 2014.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
YesDTC Holdings, Inc. (``YesDTC'') because it has not filed a periodic 
report since its Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011. YesDTC 
is a Nevada corporation and is currently quoted on OTC Link operated by 
OTC Markets Group Inc. under the ticker symbol YESD.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of YesDTC. Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 
12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the 
securities of YesDTC is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST on 
November 17, 2014, through 11:59 p.m. EST on December 1, 2014.

    By the Commission.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-27471 Filed 11-17-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
[No. 1695.]

#### George Tisdale *v.*The State.

Accomplice Testimony, unless corroborated by other evidence in the case tending to connect the accused with the offense committed, will not support a conviction.

Appeal from the County Court of Freestone. Tried below before the Hon. O. C. ICirven, County Judge.

This is the companion case to the preceding one of *Harrison*v. *The State,*the conviction being for the same offense—horse racing on a public road — and the penalty being the same. It was based on the same evidence. *.

No brief for appellant.

*445
      *J. JET. Burts,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Willson, Judge.

Each of the State’s witnesses who testified that the defendant had participated in the horse racing on a public road, had engaged in the same offense, and were, therefore, accomplices therein. Their testimony, in so far as it implicated the defendant in the commission of the offense, was uncorroborated. On the contrary, it was contradicted by the other evidence in the case. Testimony of accomplices, uncorroborated, will not sustain a conviction. (Code Crim. Proc., art. 741; *Powell*v. *The State,*15 Texas Ct. App., 441; *Dunn*v. *The State,*Id., 560.)

Other objections to the conviction presented in the record are, we think, untenable. Because the judgment is not supported by such evidence as the law demands, the same is reversed and. the cause is remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*

[Opinion delivered January 28,1885.]
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 804 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 804

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend part Q of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968 to ensure that Federal funds made available to hire 
or rehire law enforcement officers are used in a manner that produces a 
    net gain of the number of law enforcement officers who perform 
               nonadministrative public safety services.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 804

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend part Q of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968 to ensure that Federal funds made available to hire 
or rehire law enforcement officers are used in a manner that produces a 
    net gain of the number of law enforcement officers who perform 
               nonadministrative public safety services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NET GAIN OF OFFICERS.

    Section 1704 of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968 is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Net Gain of Officers.--Notwithstanding any other provision 
under this part, funding provided under this part for hiring or 
rehiring a career law enforcement officer shall be used by an entity 
described in section 1701(a) to ensure that such entity achieves a net 
gain in the number of law enforcement officers who perform 
nonadministrative public safety service.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 shall apply to all applications and 
grant renewal requests made on or after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 7, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Shenita Bell

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04154

Honorable Ronald A. Guzman

IQ Data International, Inc.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, September 23, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman: Pursuant to plaintiff's

notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

41(a)(1)(A)(i), this action is dismissed with prejudice. All pending schedules are stricken

as moot. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (kp, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04154 Document #: 9 Filed: 09/23/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:26