alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

)

IN RE: FICO ANTITRUST LITIGATION ) No. 1: 20-CV-2114

)

) Honorable Edmond E. Chang

__________________________________________)

)

This Document Relates To: )

)

Kenmore NY Teachers Federal ) No. 1:20-CV-2755

Credit Union v. Fair Isaac Corp. et al. )

__________________________________________)

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), Plaintiff Kenmore NY Teachers 

Federal Credit Union (“Kenmore”) hereby voluntarily dismisses the above-identified civil action 

without prejudice. The putative class will continue to be represented and prosecute the action on 

behalf of class members, including Kenmore.

Dated: November 11, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

 s/ Hilary K. Scherrer

Hilary K. Scherrer

Paul Gallagher

HAUSFELD LLP

888 16th Street NW, Suite 300

Washington, DC 20006

Telephone: 202-540-7200

hscherrer@hausfeld.com

pgallagher@hausfeld.com

Case: 1:20-cv-02755 Document #: 42 Filed: 11/11/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:175
2

Michael P. Lehmann 

Christopher Lebsock

HAUSFELD LLP

600 Montgomery Street, Suite 3200

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: 415-633-1908

mlehmann@hausfeld.com

clebsock@hausfeld.com

Scott A. Martin

Irving Scher

Jeanette Bayoumi

HAUSFELD LLP

33 Whitehall Street, 14th Floor

New York, NY 10004

Telephone: 646-357-1100

smartin@hausfeld.com

ischer@hausfeld.com

jbayoumi@hausfeld.com

Counsel for Plaintiff Kenmore NY Teachers 

Federal Credit Union

Case: 1:20-cv-02755 Document #: 42 Filed: 11/11/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:176
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Hilary K. Scherrer, an attorney, hereby certify that on November 11, 2021, I caused a 

true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Voluntary Dismissal be filed and served 

electronically via the Court’s CM/ECF system.

s/ Hilary K. Scherrer

Hilary K. Scherrer

Case: 1:20-cv-02755 Document #: 42 Filed: 11/11/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:177
#### City of Muncie, Indiana et al. *v.*Wilbur L. Anderson et al. The City of Richmond, Indiana *v.*Board of Trustees of the Fireman’s Pension Fund of Richmond, Indiana.

[No. 1-1074A166.

Filed September 17, 1975.

Rehearing denied October 15, 1975;

Transfer denied June 21, 1976.]

*Robert G. Burton,*Richmond, *David S. Wallace,*Muncie, for appellants.

*5• *David A. Federico,*Liberty, *Wayne J. Lennington, Lennington & Lennington,*Muncie, and *Frank E. Spencer,*Indianapolis, for appellees.

Robertson, C.-J.

The identical issue raised in the above captioned cases is whether firemen who retired prior to the 1971 amendment of IC 19.71, 19-1-37-14, Ind. Ann. Stat. § 48-6528 (Burns Supp. 1974) are entitled to the increased pension benefits resulting from that amendment.

The trial court in both cases held that the retirees were entitled to the increased benefits.

This particular issue was decided by the Third District of this court in *Schweizer et al.*v. *City of Fort Wayne*(1975), 165 Ind. App. 281, 332 N.E.2d 119. We accordingly adopt that opinion as controlling in these cases and hold that retirees prior to the 1971 amendment are entitled to the additional benefits.

Judgment affirmed.

Lowdermilk and Lybrook, JJ., concur.

Note. — Reported at 333 N.E.2d 796.
10051.

#### Williams *et al. v.*State of Georgia.

Decided April 16, 1919.

Condemnation under liquor law; from city court of Quitman— Judge W. H. Long. July 31, 1918.

*Theodore Titus, Bennet & Harrell,*for plaintiffs in error.

*John E, Morris Jr., Branch & Snow,*contra.

Per Curiam,

In a statutory proceeding to condemn or confiscate a certain automobile, alleged to have been employed in the illegal transportation of liquor contrary to the provisions of section 20 of the act of 1917, all the witnesses testified that at the time of the seizure of the car no intoxicant of any kind was found therein. While one witness swore that at a time previous to the seizure there were intoxicants in “a” ear, he swore further: “I do not know whether *that*car [having reference to the car in litigation] was used in hauling liquor or not . . . I can’t swear that *that*ear ever hauled any liquor or not.” *Held,*that the entire evidence was legally insufficient to support a verdict finding the car subject, and the judgment overruling the defendant’s motion for a now trial must be

*Reversed.*

*Wade, C. J., Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.*
10021.

#### Jester *v.*The State.

Decided December 3, 1918.

Indictment for larceny of automobile;' from Fulton superior court—Judge Hill. July 13, 1918.

*Harvey Hill*for plaintiff in error.

*John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, E. A. Stephens,*contra.

Broyles, P. J.

1. “Whether an explanation which the accused makes of his possession of property recently stolen'is consistent with hjs innocence is exclusively a question of fact for determination by the jury, and this court has no right to interfere with that determination, unless it is wholly unsupported by the evidence, or by any reasonable theory deducible therefrom.” *Jordan*v. *State,*9 *Ga. App.*578 (3) (71 S. E. 875). Under all the particular facts of the instant case the jury were authorized to disregard the explanation of the accused as to how he came into possession of the stolen, automobile.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and no substantial merit appears in .-any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth, J., concurs. Stephens, J., not presiding.*
As of January 2024

CYBERSECURITY SKILLS COMPETITIONS COMMUNITY OF INTEREST

2024 MEETING SCHEDULE

Meeting times will take place the third Friday of every month at 2:00PM Eastern 

Time to serve members from different time zones. 

January 19, 2024 Fri.

February 16, 2024 Fri.

March 15, 2024 Fri.

April 19, 2024 Fri.

May 17, 2024 Fri.

June 21, 2024 Fri.

July 19, 2024 Fri.

August 16, 2024 Fri.

September 20, 2024 Fri.

October 18, 2024 Fri.

November 15, 2024 Fri.

December 20, 2024 Fri.

All meetings will be held through Microsoft Teams, unless otherwise indicated. 

If you are a new member, please add a meeting hold to your calendar for each 

meeting. New members will receive the official calendar invite from the NICE 

Program Office one week prior to the meeting date.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE BODY OF THE
ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          13,677
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  117,835
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,610
<INVENTORY>                                     77,177
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               216,783
<PP&E>                                         377,184
<DEPRECIATION>                                  70,404
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 762,294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          109,586
<BONDS>                                        125,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,676
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,285
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   762,294
<SALES>                                        561,765
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               561,765
<CGS>                                          445,506
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  505,544
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (323)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,273
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,271
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,721
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,550
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,550
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Ecolocap Solutions Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A-1 for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Michael Siegel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 20th day of May, 2013.








MICHAEL SIEGELMichael SiegelChief Executive Officer
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, ) 

 ) Case No. 1:20-cv-04176 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Judge Franklin U. Valderrama 

 ) 

Townstone Financial, Inc., ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

UNCONTESTED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

AND FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT 

The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection’s (Bureau’s) response to Defendant’s motion 

to dismiss (Doc. No. 21) is due by November 16, 2020, per this Court’s minute order (Doc. No. 24). 

The Bureau is considering whether to respond to the motion to dismiss or to amend its Complaint, 

thereby mooting the motion to dismiss and obviating the need for a response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 

15(a). Some of the same Bureau personnel are working on each of these options. 

The Bureau seeks a coextensive nine-day extension of time, to November 25, 2020, to file its 

motion response or its amended complaint. This coextensive extension would provide ample time 

for the Bureau to make its decision and, if the Bureau decides to amend the Complaint, would 

obviate the need for the Court’s consideration of the pending motion to dismiss. 

The Bureau also requests that it be allowed to exceed the 15-page limit for its response to 

the motion to dismiss, should the Bureau decide to respond to the motion. Defendant’s motion is 

20 pages long with arguments embedded in footnotes. Defendant also has a right to reply. The 

Bureau requests a limit of 25 pages for its response to ensure sufficient space to address fully 

Defendant’s motion arguments and anticipated reply arguments. 

Case: 1:20-cv-04176 Document #: 25 Filed: 10/30/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:111
2

In sum, the Bureau requests (1) a deadline of November 25, 2020 for its amended complaint 

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 or its response to the motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 21), 

and (2) a 25-page limit for its response to the motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 21). 

Defendant does not contest this motion but requests that its reply in support of its motion 

to dismiss be due by December 16, 2020 and that its response to an amended complaint be due by 

January 15, 2021. 

Respectfully submitted, 

THOMAS G. WARD 

Enforcement Director 

CARA PETERSEN 

Principal Deputy Enforcement Director 

JEFFREY PAUL EHRLICH 

Deputy Enforcement Director 

KARA K. MILLER 

Assistant Litigation Deputy 

/s/ Barry Reiferson............................. 

BARRY REIFERSON NY Reg. #4343893 

Email: barry.reiferson@cfpb.gov 

VINCENT HERMAN DC Bar #974596 

Email: vincent.herman@cfpb.gov 

MICHAEL G. SALEMI, IL ARDC 6279741 

Email: michael.salemi@cfpb.gov 

MARY E. OLSON, IL ARDC 6297334 

Email: mary.olson@cfpb.gov 

230 S. Dearborn Street 

Suite 1590 

Chicago, IL 60604 

 and 

1700 G Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20552 

Telephone: (202) 435-9599 

Attorneys for the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 

Case: 1:20-cv-04176 Document #: 25 Filed: 10/30/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:112
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERI{ DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

F'Ifirffiffi

JUN t72o2o J

THOMASG. BRUTON

CLERK, U.S. D]STRICT COURT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

20 cR 280 JUDGE WO()D

v..

PARIS MICKLE and

TAHKISHA HODGE

MAGISTRATE 

"TUD GE F[IEiTltES

The SPECIAL JANUARY 2019 GRAND JURY charges:

1. On or about June 2,2020, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

insured the d.eposits of PNC Bank, National Association, which owned and operated

an automated teller machine ("ATM") located at 8700 South Cottage Grove, Chicago,

Illinois.

2. On or about June 2,2020, at Chicago, in the Northern District of Illinois,

Eastern Division,

PARIS MICKLE and

TAHKISHA HODGE,

d.efendants herein, conspired with each other, and with others known and unknown,

to commit an offense against the United States, namely, to take and carry away with

the intent to steal money exceeding $1,000 in value belonging to, and in the care,

custody, control, management, and possession of PNC Bank, National Association,

namely the United States currency stored in the PNC Bank ATM located. at 8700

South Cottage Grove, Chicago, Illinois, in violation of Title 18, United States Code,

Section 2113G).

Violation: Title 18, United States Code;

Section 371

Case: 1:20-cr-00280 Document #: 19 Filed: 06/17/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:48
3. It wa's part of the conspiracy that defendants agreed to break into the

PNC Bank ATM in order to steal the United States currency stored. in the ATM.

Overt Acts

4. In furtherance of, and to effect the object of, the conspiracy, defendants

committed and caused to be committed the following overt acts, among others, in the

Northern District of Illinois:

a. On or about June 2,2020, defendant PARIS MICKLE used a blow

torch to attempt to break into the PNC Bank ATM and steal the United States

currency stored in the ATM;

b. On or about June 2,2020, defendant TAHKISHA HODGE used a

chain connected to a sed.an and attached to the PNC Bank ATM to attempt to break

into the ATM and steal the United States currency stored in the ATM; and

c. On or about June 2,2020, defendant TAHKISHA HODGE used. a

chain connected to a sport utility vehicle aid attached to the PNC Bank ATM to

attempt to break into the ATM and steal the United States currency stored in the

ATM;

In violation of Tit1e 18, United States Code, Section 371.

A TRUE BILL:

FOREPERSON

2

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

Case: 1:20-cr-00280 Document #: 19 Filed: 06/17/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:49
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-40844

Summary Calendar

 

CALVIN RAY HYDER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

NAVARRO, Sgt; JAMES DUNN, COIII; 

REYES DIAZ; TERRY HICKS; 

MARCOS CUELLAR, COIII; 

MICHAEL ALEXANDER, COIII,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-95-CV-266

- - - - - - - - - -

April 15, 1997

Before SMITH, DUHE’ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Calvin Ray Hyder’s, Texas prisoner # 458495, motion to

proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is GRANTED. We assess no

initial partial filing fee; however, we direct the agency having

custody of Hyder to forward payments from his account to the

clerk of the district court each time the amount in his account
No. 96-40844

- 2 -

exceeds $10 until the filing fee in the amount of $105 is paid. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2) and (4).

Our review of the briefs and the record lead us to conclude

that the district court did not abuse its discretion in

dismissing Hyder’s civil rights action with prejudice for failure

to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Further, Hyder’s

appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. See Howard

v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the

appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.6.3

Eastern Division

Mish International Monetary Inc.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04577

Honorable Gary Feinerman

Vega Capital London, Ltd., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, December 28, 2022:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:For the reasons set forth in

the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, Trader 7's motion to dismiss [135] is

granted, Other Traders' motion to dismiss [140] is granted in part and denied in part, and

Vega Defendants' motion to dismiss [146] is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's

claims against Defendants Traders 7 and 10, and Plaintiffs' CEA Section 2(a)(1) claims

against all Defendants, are dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate

Trader 7 and Trader 10 as party defendants. The case will proceed against Defendants

Traders 1 6, 8 9, and 11 12, Vega, and Individual A on the Sherman Act Section 1 claim,

the CEA Section 9(a)(2), Section 6(c)(1), and Section 13 claims, and the unjust

enrichment claim. Those Defendants shall answer the surviving portions of the second

amended complaint by 1/20/2023.Mailed notice.(jlj, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04577 Document #: 188 Filed: 12/28/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2802
exv10w3



 






Exhibit 10.3 




PROMISSORY NOTE




			
	$60,000.00
	 	January 12, 2005





ONE MONTH (1) month after date, for value received, Performance Home Buyers LLC promises to pay
Russell E. Spruill, whose address is 250 Kimbary Drive, Centerville, OH 45458, the principal sum of
SIXTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($60,000.00) AND INTEREST OF THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($3,000.00).



The Principal and Interest payment of SIXTY THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($63,000.00) will be paid on
February 12, 2005.




	 	 	 
	 

	 	/s/ Peter E. Julian
	 

	 	 
	 

	 	Peter E. Julian
	 

	 	Managing Member
	 

	 	Performance Home Buyers LLC
	DUE: February 12, 2005
/;,:?Ljlik

BIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE

Retention Guidelines

Te c h n i c a l Wo r k i n g G r o u p o n B i o l o g i c a l E v i d e n c e P r e s e r v a t i o n

For additional guidance on biological evidence retention and the disposition process, 

please reference The Biological Evidence Preservation Handbook: Best Practices for Evidence Handlers

( http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publication-search.cfm?pub_id=913699 ).

National Institute of

Standards and Technology

U.S. Department of Commerce

National Institute of

Standards and Technology

U.S. Department of Commerce

CASE STATUS

Crime 

Categories 

(NIBRS*)

Open† Charges 

Filed

Adjudicated Unfounded/

Refused/

Denied/

No Further 

Investigation

Homicide 

Offenses

Retain 

indefinitely

Retain 

indefinitely

At a minimum, 

retain for 

the length of 

incarceration‡

Dispose of 

upon receipt of 

authorization

Sexual 

Offenses

At a minimum, 

retain for the 

length of the 

statute of 

limitations

Retain pending 

adjudication

At a minimum, 

retain for 

the length of 

incarceration‡

Dispose of 

upon receipt of 

authorization

Assault 

Offenses, 

Kidnapping/

Abduction, 

Robbery

All Other 

Group A & B 

Offenses

Dispose of 

upon receipt of 

authorization

* The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) classifies 22 types of offenses as 

Group “A” crimes and 11 types of lesser offenses as Group “B” crimes. This table uses the NIBRS crime categories.

† Cases in which someone was found not guilty after criminal proceedings and additional suspects have not yet been identified 

or charged should follow the same guidance as open cases.

‡ Statutes regarding the disposition of biological evidence from homicide, sexual offenses, and other crime categories vary from 

state to state. Almost all states that have statutes require that such evidence be held for the period of incarceration; a few 

states require that the evidence be held for the period of probation, parole, or registration as a sex offender. Custodians should 

check their state statutes. Written authorization for disposal should be obtained from the assigned case investigator. (Note: If 

the assigned investigator is no longer employed by the agency, a designated investigator should give written approval.)
Distributed Power-aware 

Machinery as a Foundation for Next Generation Sustainable Manufacturing Dr. Fred M. Discenzo, Dr. Ram Pai, Dan Carnahan, P.E. Rockwell Automation November 3, 2009 

on, Inc. All rights reserved. 
y Drivers As We Look Into The Future 

Copyright © 2009 Rockwell Automation, Inc. All rights reserved. 
ustry trends and needs 

r Trends 

Metal 

Composites 

Internal combustion 

Fuel cells, batteries 

Paper / Manual tracking 

Automated track & trace Plant / chemical Molecular / bio 

Crystal growth 

Nano tubes 

nities to reduce energy intensity Need for increased integration of 

ugh innovations in manufacturing energy efficiency, demand response and 

processes emissions control with production 

Copyright © 2009 Rockwell Automation, Inc. All rights reserved. 
art, Safe and Sustainable Manufacturing 

n ICT & automation is 

aborative 

Management”1 

missions will be viewed 

s sold & tracked 

chains that span the 

product lifecycle. 

manufacturers 

processes better, 

gies & plan schedules, 

eal time to dynamically 

w materials, processes 

ently optimize in real 

gy, environmental and  requirements. 

Copyright © 2009 Rockwell Automation, Inc. All rights reserved. 
Copyright © 2009 Rockwell Automation, Inc. All rights reserved. 

D Needs 

 Sensing & measurement 

 Modeling & simulation 

Dynamic link to plant 

manufacturing equipment 

& energy sources 

Knowledge 

 Distributed energy 

 & energy storage 

Manufacturing 

technology 

 Methodologies for agile 

 integrated manufacturing 

stand processes better 

ategies & plan schedules 

w materials, processes & 

energy 

 optimize in real time for 

onmental & performance 

equirements. 
Common Software 

Infrastructure 

mart Distributed Power-aware Machines 

the growing trend toward distributed intelligent devices – employ open 

or interoperability (e.g. FIPA) 

ynamically re-configure (i.e. self-organize) to meet production requirements 

eliable manner while minimizing energy requirements 

e framework supporting dynamic reconfiguration is autonomous agents1 – 

ely on a biological analogy – e.g. ants, bees, geese 

basis for managing increasing complexity, unknown disturbances, and 

t fluctuations. Real time response achieves superior performance levels in 

zation, waste reduction, and sustainable production. 

with Dynamic Reconfigurable Agents” , Fred M. Discenzo, Francisco Maturana, Raymond Staron, Pavel Stichy, Petr Slechta, Vladimir Marik, WSEAS Conference 

e on Electroscience and Technology for Naval Engineering and All-Electric Ship, Vouliagmeni, Athens, Greece, July12-14, 2004 

Copyright © 2009 Rockwell Automation, Inc. All rights reserved. 
ank you! 

Copyright © 2009 Rockwell Automation, Inc. All rights reserved.