3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION

ABC CORPORATION I, 

ABC CORPORATION II,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND 

UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS 

IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A,

Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 1:20-cv-4806 

Judge Thomas M. Durkin 

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole 

NOTICE OF RECENT RELATED DECISION

Defendant Gyroor-US (“Defendant” or “Gyroor-US”) and third-party respondents Gyroor, 

Urbanmax, GaodeshangUS, Fengchi-US, Gyroshoes, and HGSM (collectively, “Third-Party 

Respondents”) respectfully submit this Notice of Recent Related Decision in reference to Plaintiffs 

Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. (“Chic”) and Unicorn Global, Inc.’s (“Unicorn”, and 

collectively with Chic, “Plaintiffs”) pending Motion for Return of Bond (the “Motion”). [Dkt. No. 653-

656]. 

Since briefing of the Motion, Plaintiffs have brought another similar motion for return of bond 

in a parallel case captioned as “Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., et al v. The Partnerships 

and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, et al, Case No: 1:20-cv-05905”. In this 

parallel case, after fully briefing the relevant issues, this Court has denied Plaintiffs’ motion for return 

of bond as premature. A true and correct copy of this Order is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 

In this Order, this Court stated that “this Court previously issued a TRO and a preliminary 

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 664 Filed: 08/01/23 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:16699
3

injunction, but later vacated the preliminary injunction for lack of notice. Meanwhile, the case is still 

pending on the merits. Defendant might seek damages someday based on the notion that it was 

‘wrongfully enjoined or restrained,’ as provided in Rule 65(c). That possibility is enough to justify the

continuation of the bond. Plaintiffs obtained injunctive relief, and posted a bond as a security in case the 

bond was improper. And that issue remains unresolved, so the bond needs to remain in place.” 

Date: 08/01/2023 /s/ Yu-Hao Yao

Yu-Hao Yao, Esq 

GLACIER LAW LLP

251 South Lake Ave, Suite 910 

Pasadena, CA 91101 

mickey.yao@glacier.law

312-448-7772 

Glacier Law LLP

506 Second Ave., Ste 1516 

Seattle, WA 98104 

Na Zhang, Esq. 

queena.zhang@glacier.law 

206-397-8633 

GLACIER LAW LLP

200 E. Randolph Dr., Ste. 5100 

Chicago, IL 60601 

Ruoting Men, Esq. 

ruoting.men@glacier.law

Tianyu Ju, Esq. 

Iris.ju@glacier.law

312-270-0413 

GLACIER LAW LLP

41 Madison Avenue, Ste 2529 

New York, NY 10010 

Tao Liu, Esq. 

Wei Wang, Esq.

Tao.liu@glacier.law

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 664 Filed: 08/01/23 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:16700
3

wei.wang@glacier.law

332-777-7315

Attorneys for Defendant and Third-Party 

Respondents

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 664 Filed: 08/01/23 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:16701
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this August 1, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing file 

with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, and service was perfected on all counsel of 

record and interested parties through this system, which will deliver a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing documents via CM/ECF. 

Date: 08/01/2023 /s/ Yu-Hao Yao

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 664 Filed: 08/01/23 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:16702