alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Thomas D. Eckert, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Capital AutomotiveREIT; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantwe have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of trustees (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: November 5, 2004 BY: /s/ Thomas D. Eckert           Thomas D. Eckert     President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

FOX VALLEY LABORERS HEALTH AND )

WELFARE FUND, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, ) CIVIL ACTION

)

v. ) NO. 20 C 3979

)

PALLERA CONSTRUCTION, INC., an Illinois ) JUDGE ELAINE E. BUCKLO

corporation, )

)

Defendant. )

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

TO: Michael V. Pall, Registered Agent/President

Pallera Construction, Inc.

40W191 Wildwood Drive

Aurora, IL 60506-8907

NOW COME Plaintiffs, by and through their attorneys, and, as of right in accordance with

Rule 41(a)(1)(i), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby dismiss this action without prejudice to

the rights of Plaintiffs. 

/s/ Catherine M. Chapman 

Catherine M. Chapman

Attorney for Plaintiffs

BAUM SIGMAN AUERBACH & NEUMAN, LTD.

200 West Adams Street, Suite 2200

Chicago, IL 60606-5231

Bar No.: 6204026

Telephone: (312) 216-2565

Telefax: (312) 236-0241

E-Mail: cchapmanbaumsigman.com

Case: 1:20-cv-03979 Document #: 7 Filed: 10/21/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:20
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned, an attorney of record, hereby certifies that she electronically filed the

foregoing document (Notice of Voluntary Dismissal) with the Clerk of Court using the CM-ECF

system, and further certifies that I have mailed the above-referenced document byUnited States Mail

to the following non-CM/ECF participant on or before the hour of 5:00 p.m. this 21st day of October

2020:

Michael V. Pall, Registered Agent/President

Pallera Construction, Inc.

40W191 Wildwood Drive

Aurora, IL 60506-8907

/s/ Catherine M. Chapman 

Catherine M. Chapman

Attorney for Plaintiffs

BAUM SIGMAN AUERBACH & NEUMAN, LTD.

200 West Adams Street, Suite 2200

Chicago, IL 60606-5231

Bar No.: 6204026

Telephone: (312) 216-2565

Telefax: (312) 236-0241

E-Mail: cchapman@baumsigman.com

I:\FVLJ\Pallera Construction\#29102\notice of voluntary dismissal.cmc.df.wpd

Case: 1:20-cv-03979 Document #: 7 Filed: 10/21/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:21
EXHIBIT 15.1

May 11, 1999

ESG RE Limited
Skandia International House
16 Church Street
Hamilton, Bermuda

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of ESG RE Limited and subsidiaries for the periods ended March 31,
1999 and 1998, as indicated in our report dated May 11, 1999; because we did not
perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-40341 on Form F-1.

We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche
---------------------
Deloitte & Touche

Hamilton, Bermuda

                                       23
Reflectometry Software Installation

Please install/verify the software below on the laptop you will bring to the school:

Analysis: Refl1D

Obtaining a working copy of Refl1D is relatively straightforward, and instructions can be found 

here: https://www.nist.gov/ncnr/data-reduction-analysis/reflectometry-software. For this 

school (on a Windows machine), we recommend downloading and unzipping an executable 

form of the latest stable release (v0.8.15) found here:

https://github.com/reflectometry/refl1d/releases/tag/v0.8.15 . Instructions for Mac and Linux 

users are also provided but may be slightly more complicated to implement. 

Reduction: reductus

Raw reflectometry data at NCNR is processed in the online reductus application, hosted at 

https://reductus.nist.gov – the application is designed to work in an updated Chrome, Firefox or 

Safari browser (with JavaScript enabled)

Please verify that the site loads and looks like this in your browser, prior to the school:

Please do not hesitate to contact brian.maranville@nist.gov with any questions.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

John Doe

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.:

1:20−cv−04518

Honorable John

J. Tharp Jr.

The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability

Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated

Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, November 17, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:The time for answering the

plaintiff's complaint expired on 9/15/2020. The unopposed motion by defendants

5happydeals, JCHENG, Whitelotous, Yehf., and cheerfuldays 08 for an extension of time

[42] is granted. The moving defendants' responses to the amended complaint are due by

12/7/2020. Mailed notice(air, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04518 Document #: 43 Filed: 11/17/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2050
9998.

#### Ceylona Company *v.*Selden Truck Sales Company.

Decided January 15, 1919.

Luke, J.

1. Where an automobile is sold with warranty of quality, and the automobile delivered' by the seller does not correspond with the warranty, the correct measure of damages is the difference between the contract price and the actual value of the' automobile when and where delivered. *Oxford Knitting Mills*v. *Wooldridge,*6 *Ga. App.*301 (64 S. E. 1008). . ,

2. Under the pleadings in this case the court did not err in sustaining objection to the admission of garage bills and receipts for team hire, claimed to be money expended while the automobile was out of repair.

3. No error of law appears; and the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, is fully supported by the evidence.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, C. J., and Jenlans, J., concur.*

*276Complaint; from city court of Atlanta—Judge Reid. June 14, 1918.

*William A. Fuller,*for plaintiff in error.

*Anderson, Rountree & Crenshaw,*contra:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

DEBORAH LAUFER, Individually,

Plaintiff,

v.

233 E ONTARIO HOTEL PROPCO LLC

d/b/a IVY HOTEL, a Foreign Limited Liability

Company,

Defendant.

_______________________________________

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:20-cv-04593

Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF CASE WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby moves this court to dismiss the instant

case with prejudice pursuant to a settlement agreement entered into between the parties.

FOR THE PLAINTIFF:

/s/ Kimberly A. Corkill

Kimberly A. Corkill, Of Counsel

Thomas B. Bacon, P.A. 

644 North Mc Donald St.

Mt. Dora, FL 32757

ph. (954) 478-7811

kimberlyatlaw@gmail.com

Florida Bar. Id. No. 84942

Attorneys for Plaintiff

FOR THE DEFENDANT:

 /s/ Kenneth D. Walsh

Kenneth D. Walsh, Esq.

Mary A. Smigielski

Stephen L. Sitley

Kenneth D. Walsh

550 West Adams Street, Suite 300

Chicago, Illinois 60661

(312) 463-3496

Mary.Smigielski@lewisbrisbois.com

Stephen.Sitley@lewisbrisbois.com

Kenneth.Walsh@lewisbrisbois.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that June 7, 2021 I filed the foregoing using the Clerk of Court’s CM/ECF efiling system, which will serve all counsel of record electronically.

/s/Kimberly A. Corkill

 Attorney

Case: 1:20-cv-04593 Document #: 20 Filed: 06/07/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:84
#### M. S. Cralle *v.*James Marshall, etc.

Executors and Administrators — Support of Widow out of Estate.

An executor may make an agreement for the support of the widow and is entitled to credit on settlement, for the amount so paid.

APPEAL FROM HARDIN CIRCUIT COURT.

February 29, 1872.

*Cofer, for appellant.*

Wilson, *for appellees.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Pryor :

The exceptions to the commissioner’s report filed by the appellees ought not to have been sustained except as to the small note of H. W. Cralle. The proof shows clearly that the obligors in the notes were insolvent, and to have instituted suit would only have burdened the estate with costs. Hawkins, the' son-in-law of the Devisor Cralle, was supporting and maintaining the widow under an agreement with the executor. She doubtless preferred living with her daughter, and Hawkins was not willing, or able, by reason of his poverty and> insolvency, to take care of his mother-in-law, without being paid the money by the executor to enable him to comply with his agreement. It was proper for the executor to pay it, although Hawkins was indebted to the estate. If he had refused to pay the money, the consequence would have been a separation of the mother from the daughter, and a payment of the money for her support to some one else. The settlement shows an indebtedness to the executor, and no judgment should have been rendered against him.* It appears from the commissioner’s report that the widow is dead, and the money or notes in the hands of the receiver may be sufficient to pay these appellees what is due them, or at least their pro rata portion after full and final settlement, etc. The judgment of the court below is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

Long Leaf Trading Group, Inc., James A. 

Donelson, Timothy M. Evans, Jeremy S. 

Ruth, and Andrew D. Nelson, 

Defendants.

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 20-3758 

Hon. Thomas A. Durkin 

PARTIALLY AGREED-TO PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF SUPPLEMENTAL RELIEF

Plaintiff Commodity Future Trading Commission (“CFTC”) hereby submits the positions 

of the parties with respect to a briefing schedule on the CFTC’s Motion for Entry of 

Supplemental Relief Against Defendants Donelson, Long Leaf Trading Group, Inc. (“Long Leaf 

Trading”), and Ruth (Doc. 111). 

The Counsel for the CFTC and counsel for Defendant Donelson to a briefing schedule of 

September 7, 2022, for Donelson’s response, and September 14, 2022, for the CFTC’s reply. 

Counsel for Long Leaf Trading failed to timely respond to the CFTC’s request for a 

proposed briefing schedule. 

Defendant Ruth, who is currently pro se, requests a “[m]inimum [of] 90 days” for his 

response. (See Ex. A, Emails between A. Burden and J. Ruth, Aug. 24, 2022.) Counsel for the 

CFTC could not reach an agreement with Defendant Ruth on a briefing schedule, and thus 

submits the matter to the Court for resolution. 

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 113 Filed: 08/24/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:2837
2

/s/ Ashley J. Burden

Ashley J. Burden

aburden@cftc.gov

Elizabeth M. Streit

estreit@cftc.gov

Jody Platt

jplatt@cftc.gov

Counsel for Plaintiff CFTC

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Division of Enforcement

77 West Jackson Blvd.

Suite 800

Chicago, IL 60604 

(312) 596-0700

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 113 Filed: 08/24/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:2838
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 24, 2022, I provided service to the persons listed below, 

and by the following means:

Via the Court’s electronic CM/ECF system: Via email, pursuant to agreement, to:

Jim Falvey 

Falvey Law Office

200 S. Wacker Dr., Ste. 3100

Chicago, IL 60606-5877

jimfalvey@yahoo.com

Charles E. McElvenny

Law Office of Charles E. McElvenny

33 N. Dearborn St., Ste. 1000

Chicago, IL 60602

Counsel to James A. Donelson and Long Leaf 

Trading Group, Inc.1

Jeremey S. Ruth

11220 Brista Way

Austin, TX 78726

jeremysruth@hotmail.com

Pro se

/s/ Ashley J. Burden

Ashley J. Burden

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Division of Enforcement

77 West Jackson Blvd.

Suite 800

Chicago, IL 60604 

(312) 596-0700

aburden@cftc.gov

 1 Mr. McElvenny is counsel to Defendant Donelson only, and not to Long Leaf Trading.

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 113 Filed: 08/24/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:2839
Exhibit 32.1   SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                             APD ANTIQUITIES, INC.
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the amended annual report of APD ANTIQUITIES, INC., a Nevada
corporation ("Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350) that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

3.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.


Date:  August 28, 2006

                              By:   Cindy K. Swank
                                    --------------------
                                    Cindy K. Swank
EXHIBIT 10.1

                            HYBRID FUEL SYSTEMS, INC.

                          2005 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN "B"

                                   ARTICLE I.

                        PURPOSE AND ADOPTION OF THE PLAN

1.1. PURPOSE. The purpose of the Hybrid Fuel Systems,  Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive
Plan "B"  (hereinafter  referred to as the  "Plan") is to assist in  attracting,
retaining  and  compensating  highly  competent  consultants  and  to  act as an
incentive in motivating  selected  consultants  of Hybrid Fuel Systems,  Inc. to
achieve  long-term  corporate  objectives,  as well as to  reduce  debts  of the
Company through the issuance of Common Stock rather than the payment of cash.

1.2.  ADOPTION  AND TERM.  The Plan has been  approved by the Board of Directors
(hereinafter   referred  to  as  the  "Board")  of  Hybrid  Fuel  Systems,  Inc.
(hereinafter  referred to as the  "Company"),  effective as of November 9, 2005.
The Plan shall remain in effect until terminated by action of the Board.

                                   ARTICLE II.

                                     SHARES

2.1. NUMBER OF SHARES ISSUABLE.  The total number of shares initially authorized
to be  issued  under the Plan  shall be  300,000  shares of common  stock of the
Company, par value $0.001 per share ("Common Stock").

                                  ARTICLE III.

                                  PARTICIPATION

3.1.  ELIGIBLE  PARTICIPANTS.  Participants  in  the  Plan  shall  be  such  key
consultants of the Company as the Board, in its sole  discretion,  may designate
from time to time. The Board's  issuance of Common Stock to a participant in any
year shall not require  the Board to  designate  such  person to receive  Common
Stock in any other  year.  The Board  shall  consider  such  factors as it deems
pertinent  in selecting  participants  and in  determining  the amount of Common
Stock to be issued.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 584 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                       October 8, 1998.
    Resolved, That during consideration of the bill (H.R. 4274) making 
appropriations for the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and 
Education, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1999, 
and for other purposes, in the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the 
Union pursuant to House Resolution 564--
            (1) general debate shall not exceed one hour; and
            (2) amendments numbered 2 and 3 in House Report 105-762 shall be in 
        order before consideration of any other amendment.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 365

Regarding the bill S. 1150, the Agricultural Research, Extension, and

Education Reauthorization Act of 1998.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 24, 1998

Mr. SMITH of Oregon (for himself, Mr. STENHOLM, Mr. COMBEST, and Mr.

DOOLEY of California) submitted the following resolution; which was considered under suspension of the rules and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Regarding the bill S. 1150, the Agricultural Research,

Extension, and Education Reauthorization Act of 1998.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution the

2 House shall be considered to have:

3 (1) taken from the Speaker’s table the bill (S.

4 1150 entitled ‘‘An Act to ensure that federally fund5 ed agricultural research, extension, and education

6 address high-priority concerns with national or

7 multistate significance, to reform, extend, and elimi8 nate certain agricultural research programs, and for

9 other purposes’’;
2

HRES 365 ATH

1 (2) struck out all after the enacting clause of

2 the bill S. 1150 and inserted in lieu thereof an

3 amendment consisting of the text of the bill (H.R.

4 2534) entitled ‘‘An Act to reform, extend, and repeal

5 certain agricultural research, extension, and edu6 cation programs, and for other purposes’’, as passed

7 by the House;

8 (3) passed the bill S. 1150 as amended; and

9 (4) insisted on the House amendment and re10 quested a conference with the Senate thereon.

Æ
10283.

#### Pynetree Paper Company *v.*Wood.

Luke, J.

1. In an action for a personal injury, where the injury alleged Was not entirely to the peace, happiness, and feelings of the plaintiff, it was reversible error for the court to give in charge to the jury the *605provision of the code that “the worldly circumstances of the parties, the amount of bad faith in the .transaction, and all the attendant facts should be weighed” (Civil Code of 1910, § 4504). For this reason the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial must be reversed.

Decided April 17, 1919.

Rehearing Denied May 13, 1919.

Action for damages; from Irwin superior court—Judge Park presiding. December 11, 1918.

The action was-on account of the cutting off of fingers of the plaintiff in consequence of the slipping of a rope -which hé was splicing on a pulley in the defendant’s mill.

*Bryan & Middlebrooks, George H. Carswell,*for plaintiff in error.

*Allen & Pottle,*contra.

2. The other grounds of the motion for a new trial are not likely to arise on another trial of the case, and are not now considered.

*Judgment*reversed.

*Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,923
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,305
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,518
<PP&E>                                           5,541
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,842
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  98,772
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,758
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,757
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    98,722
<SALES>                                         32,479
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,479
<CGS>                                           24,953
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,907
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (395)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       195
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (590)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (590)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>