alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       6,485,383
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,109,217
<PP&E>                                       3,506,730
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              96,616,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,423,243
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,956
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                96,616,519
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,737,895
<CGS>                                       19,504,780
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (555,334)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   563,427
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,118,761)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



                                  CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  the undersigned  officer of ING USA Annuity and
Life Insurance  Company (the "Company")  hereby certifies that, to the officer's
knowledge,  the  Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
or 15(d),  as applicable,  of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



May 12, 2005                    By /s/  David A. Wheat
------------                       ---------------------------------------------
   (Date)                               David A. Wheat
                                        Director, Senior Vice President and
                                          Chief Financial Officer
Order entered February 2 4 , 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 20
- 00023
- CV MILTON ALFARO, Appellant

V. FLOORPLAN XPRESS LLC . - OK, Appellee On Appeal from the 471 st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 471
- 03422
- 2019



### O RDER Before the Court is Collin County District Clerk Lynne Finley’s second notice to the Court that appellant has not paid the fee f or the clerk’s record

. Although ap pellant filed a letter February 10, 2020 stating he was paying the clerk’s fee, the enclosed check was for payment of the appellate court filing fee. Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file, no later than March 2, 2020, written verification he has paid or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. We caution appellant that failure to comply may result in the appeal being dismissed without further notice. See T EX


### . R. A PP


### . P. 37.3(b) , 42.3(b),(c)

.
/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications

**CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, William Marshall, Chief Executive Officer and  Director of Cascade Energy Inc., certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the "Report") for the period ended February 28, 2006, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof:
|   | (i)                | fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|--------|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Act of 1934, as amended, and |  
 

 

(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial

 

condition and results of operations of Cascade Energy Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

By:

*/s/ William Marshall**CEO* and a member of the Board of DirectorsJune 14, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cascade Energy Inc., and will be retained by Cascade Energy Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

D/ljm/868579.1

 

 

  |
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification ofChief Executive Officer of GFI Group Inc.Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of GFI Group Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Michael Gooch, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to the 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

1.     The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Date: March 1, 2007 |   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Michael Gooch        |   |   |
| Michael Gooch            |   |   |
| Chairman of the Board    |   |   |
| Chief Executive Officer  |   |   |

 

----
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------



                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2004-10
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-10


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

     (i)   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
     preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer
     under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

     (ii)  To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master
     Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout
     such year.




/s/ Joseph M. Candelario                    Dated: March 28, 2005
------------------------

JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Mark Wong                               Dated: March 28, 2005
-------------

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
**Exhibit
      15.1**




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
      have
      issued our report dated April 18, 2007 (except for Note 18d, for which
      the date is June 27, 2007), accompanying the consolidated financial
      statements included in the Annual Report of Vuance Ltd. (formerly: Supercom
      Ltd.) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006. We hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration
      Statements of Vuance Ltd. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-121231, effective
      December 14, 2004).






Fahn
      Kanne & Co.


Certified
      Public Accountants (Isr.)




Tel-Aviv,
      Israel


June
      27,
      2007
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONFURNISHED PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Pliant Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, HaroldC. Bevis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company for and as of the end of the periodscovered in this Report.

 
| /s/  Harold C. Bevis     |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Harold  C. Bevis         |
| Chief  Executive Officer |
| November 21,  2005  |

 

----
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

# **I, Brian W.Bethers, certify that:**

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof 1-800 CONTACTS, INC.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)              All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Dated: May 12, 2005 | /s/ Brian W. Bethers                  |   |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                     | President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
1

Order filed June 17, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00127-CV

____________

IN RE ROBERT M. SPRAGUE, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

257th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2005-48988

CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER

On February 11, 2014, relator, Robert M. Sprague, filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221. In the petition 

relator complained of a number of pretrial evidentiary rulings issued by The 

Honorable Judy Warne, Judge of the 257th District Court, Harris County, Texas, in 

trial court cause number 2005-48988, styled In the Matter of the Marriage of R.M. 

Sprague and D.L. Sprague.

This court requested a response to the petition from real party in interest to 

be filed on or before February 18, 2014. On February 18, 2014, the parties in the 
2

underlying case filed a joint motion to suspend this court’s deadline for filing a 

response to the petition because the parties are attempting to settle the case. On 

February 25, 2014, we granted the parties’ motion to suspend, abated the case for a 

period of thirty days from the date of the abatement order, and directed relator and 

real party in interest to advise the court of the status of the settlement. 

Upon the advisement of the real party in interest that the parties were still 

attempting to settle the under case, we issued two orders on April 4, 2014, and 

May 7, 2014, each continuing the abatement of the case for an additional period of 

thirty days from the dates of the orders, and directing the relator and real party in 

interest to advise the court of the status of the settlement.

On June 6, 2014, real party in interest advised this court that the parties are 

still attempting to settle the case, and requested the abatement be continued. We 

GRANT the request. 

Therefore, the abatement of this case is continued for an additional period of 

thirty days, at which time relator and real party in interest are directed to advise the 

court of the status of the settlement. The original proceeding will be reinstated on 

this court’s active docket when the parties file a motion to dismiss the original 

proceeding or other dispositive motion. The court also will consider an appropriate 

motion to reinstate the original proceeding, or the court may reinstate the original 

proceeding on its own motion.

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Wise.
January 25, 2007 

Re: Standards for Ballot Screen Layout Formatting 

South Dakota is using optical scan ballots with an AutoMark for the assistive device. I 

understand the importance of proper ballot layout. We go to great lengths to make sure our 

paper ballots are well layout is perfect. Unfortunately as we prepared for the 2006 general 

election, we were faced with severe limitations in laying out the screens on the AutoMark. We 

knew what we needed to do for good layout but the limitations in the programming software 

prevented us from optimal screen layout. 

 

 A couple of examples: 

1. Ballot question text had to be a center justified. We could not left justify the paragraphs. 

2. The size of the boxes around each candidate's name could not be easily controlled. Some 

candidates would have a larger box than another. Or the boxes would be the same size in regular 

type but when the zoom button was activated for large print the boxes became differing sizes. 

You can understand the horrible implications this has for treating each candidate fairly. In most 

cases (but not all) we were able to "trick" the system by putting varying numbers of spaces and a 

period after the candidate name. 

3. Text could not be underlined. 

4. Bolding could only be done by line, not individual words. 

 

Because of this experience, I am of the opinion that the standards should include some minimum 

requirements for screen layout formatting. 

 

Thanks for taking my input. 

Chris Nelson 

South Dakota Secretary of State
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15




August 6, 1997


Koger Equity, Inc.
3986 Boulevard Center Drive
Jacksonville, Florida 32207

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Koger Equity, Inc. and subsidiaries for the periods ended June
30, 1997 and 1996, as indicated in our report dated August 6, 1997; because we
did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on such financial information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-55179 on Form S-3,
Registration Statement No. 33-54617 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No.
333-20975 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement No. 333-23429 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.






DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Jacksonville, Florida
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3836 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3836

 To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit 
the operation of the medicare comparative cost adjustment (CCA) program 
                            in Pennsylvania.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2004

  Mr. Hoeffel (for himself, Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania, Mr. Doyle, Mr. 
   Fattah, Mr. Holden, Mr. Kanjorski, and Mr. Murtha) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
  Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit 
the operation of the medicare comparative cost adjustment (CCA) program 
                            in Pennsylvania.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON OPERATION OF MEDICARE COMPARATIVE COST 
              ADJUSTMENT (CCA) PROGRAM IN PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 1860C-1(b)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-
29(b)(2)), as added by section 241(a) of the Medicare Prescription 
Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173), 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) No part in pennsylvania.--No part of the MSA 
                is in Pennsylvania.''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John S. Reiland, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of US Dataworks, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. Date: August 16, 2004 / s/ John S. ReilandJohn S. Reiland,Chief Financial Officer