alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 78 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     February 26, 1997.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and that they are hereby, 
named to the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure: Mr. Fox, Mr. Davis of 
Virginia, Mr. LoBiondo, and Mr. Watts of Oklahoma.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
INFORMATION
AL TECHNOLOGY _
a LABORATORY

Open Forum: Cybersecurity
Framework

e Manage/Reduce cybersecurity risk for
owners/operators of critical
infrastructure

e Minor update (Winter 2017)

CYBERSECURITY FRAMEWORK USAGE

e International Outreach

e Draft Baldrige Cybersecurity
Excellence Builder



INFORMATION
AL TECHNOLOGY _
LABORATORY —

Cryptography

e Build trust in globally interoperable
encryption standards

e Building Internal Capability

e International Engagements & Engagement
with Broader Community

e Internal Policies



INFORMATION
AL TECHNOLOGY _
a LABORATORY

Open Forum: Presidential

Commission on Cybersecurity

e Strengthen cybersecurity in the public and private
sectors over the next decade

e Detailed and actionable recommendations to the
President by December 1, 2016



& INFORMATION
00 TECHNOLOGY
_ Y

Update:
Cybersecurity
Activities

Charles H. Romine,

Director, ITL
October 18, 2016


INFORMATION
AL TECHNOLOGY ___
a LABORATORY

New Opportunities

e Intersection of technical expertise and policy
development

e Growth areas
e Internet of Things
e Data Analytics
e Machine Learning/Artificial Intelligence
e National Strategic Computing Initiative


INFORMATION
AL TECHNOLOGY
LABORATORY —

National Cybersecurity Center of
Excellence (NCCoE)

e Build trust in the digital economy and accelerate
the adoption of standards-based cybersecurity
technologies

e Partnerships and Collaborations
e@ Facility National Cyberse urity Center of Excellence
e Outputs



INFORMATION
AL TECHNOLOGY _
a LABORATORY

National Strategy for Trusted

Identities in Cyberspace

e Build trust in the digital economy through trusted
digital identities

e Pilots

e NCCoE

e Lessons learned
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of United PanAm Financial Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Arash
      Khazei, certify in my capacity as Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice
      President of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(a)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




(b)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto signed this Certification as
      of
      May 8, 2008.




/s/    Arash
                Khazei**Arash
                Khazei****Chief
                Financial Officer and Executive Vice
                President**
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

	OF TEXAS

	NO. WR-85,283-01

	EX PARTE JAMES CALVERT

ON NOTICE OF UNTIMELY APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

	FILED IN CAUSE 	NO. 241-1467-12

	IN THE 241ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

	SMITH COUNTY

	Per curiam.  

	O R D E R

	This case is before us because an application for a writ of habeas corpus has not been timely filed pursuant to the provisions of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.071.1

	The trial court appointed counsel to represent Applicant in a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus under Article 11.071.  Approximately two months later, Katherine Ginzburg Treistman was allowed to substitute as retained counsel.  On June 19, 2018, the State filed in this Court its brief on Applicant’s direct appeal.  Pursuant to Article 11.071, § 4(a), counsel should have filed Applicant’s writ application no later than August 3, 2018.

	Applicant filed in the trial court a motion requesting a 90-day extension for filing his writ application.  When the trial court failed to rule on this motion before August 3, 2018, Applicant sent to this Court his “Emergency Motion for Extension of Time to File Initial State Habeas Application.”  On August 6, 2018, the trial court signed an order purporting to grant Applicant’s request for a 90-day extension and to make Applicant’s writ due on November 1, 2018.  On August 9, 2018, we received Applicant’s “Withdrawal of Emergency Motion for Extension of Time to File Initial State Habeas Application.”

	Applicant’s writ application was not filed by August 3, 2018, as required by Article 11.071, § 4(a).  However, the trial judge’s order granting an extension was not authorized because he signed the order granting the extension three days after the statutory deadline.  Without the intervention of this Court, any writ filed after August 3, 2018 would be untimely.  Under these circumstances, we find good cause to permit counsel to continue representing Applicant, and we will set a new due date.  Applicant’s request for an extension is granted, and his motion to withdraw the request is denied.  The writ application will be considered timely if it is filed in the trial court by November 1, 2018.            

	IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2018.

Do Not Publish
EXHIBIT 31.1

AMERICAN PATRIOT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CERTIFICATION

I,
William J. Smead, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Patriot Financial Group, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: April 15, 2009

Signature:

/s/ WILLIAM J. SMEADWilliam J. Smead Interim Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
10280.

#### Cox *v.*Barton & Powell.

Decided April 16, 1919.

Complaint; from city court of Yaldosta—Judge Cranford. November. 14, 1918.

*A. T. Woodward, Whitaker & Dukes,*for plaintiff in error-

*James M. Johnson,*contra.

Luke, J.

Assignments of error not urged in the brief of the plaintiff in error will be treated as abandoned. The evidence in this case, though conflicting, was sufficient to authorize the verdict. The finding of the jury having the approval of the able trial judge, and there being no error of law in the trial, insisted upon here,- the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial is-

*Affirmed.*

*Wade, C.*J., *and Jenkins, J., concur.*
Exhibit No. 99.2

[On Letterhead of Aston Bell, Certified Public Accountant]

Independent Accountants Report

Corporate Asset Backed Corporation, (as Depositor)

68 South
Service Road, Suite 120

Melville, NY 11747

U.S. Bank Trust
National Association

Corporate Trust Services

100 Wall
Street, Suite 1600

New York, NY 10005



|Re: | CABCO Series 2004-101 Trust (Goldman Sachs Capital I) (the Trust)
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have examined assertions of Corporate Asset Backed Corporation (the Depositor) and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, (the
Trustee and, together with the Depositor, the Management) that the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the provisions of the Trust Agreement dated as of May 20, 2004, (the Trust
Agreement) in respect of the CABCO Series 2004-101 Trust (Goldman Sachs Capital I) (the Trust), during the periods covered by the annual report on Form 10-K filed by the Depositor on behalf of the Trust for the year ended
December 31, 2014 (the Annual Report). Management is responsible for compliance with the Trust Agreement. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Managements assertions based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Depositors and the Trustees compliance with the Trust Agreement and performing such other procedures as considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the Trust
Agreement during the period covered by the Annual Report and Managements assertions with respect to such compliance are fairly stated, in all material respects, for the year ended December 31, 2014.

/s/ Aston Bell, CPA

New York, New York

March 25, 2015
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

Shenita Bell,

Plaintiff,

v.

I.Q. Data International, Inc.,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:20-cv-04154

Honorable Ronald A. Guzman

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

NOW COMES Plaintiff, by and through counsel, to notify the Court that the parties have 

reached a settlement. The parties are currently working on facilitating the settlement. Plaintiff

expect to dismiss this case within sixty days.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

Date: August 3, 2020 By: /s/ Jeffrey S. Hyslip

Jeffrey S. Hyslip, Esq.

Hyslip Legal, LLC

1100 W. Cermak Rd., Suite 514

Chicago, IL 60608

Phone: 614-490-6491

jeffrey@hysliplegal.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case: 1:20-cv-04154 Document #: 6 Filed: 08/03/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:21
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 3, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing Notice. 

Service of this filing will be made by the Plaintiff’s counsel upon the following:

Paul Gamboa, Esq.

GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI

One North Franklin, Suite 800

Chicago, IL 60606

Counsel for Defendant

 

/s/ Jeffrey S. Hyslip

Case: 1:20-cv-04154 Document #: 6 Filed: 08/03/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:22
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-25-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1999
<CASH>                                          22,696
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,116
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,793
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                98,646
<PP&E>                                          18,290
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,457
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 152,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,017
<BONDS>                                        100,599
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           378
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,663
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   152,071
<SALES>                                        277,097
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               277,097
<CGS>                                          244,452
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  244,452
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,604
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,931
<INCOME-TAX>                                       670
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,261
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    388
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,649
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>THE COMPANY'S EQUITY IS NOT PUBLICLY TRADED.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Jay M. Short, Ph.D., the Chief Executive Officer of Diversa Corporation (the Company), and Karin Eastham, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her
knowledge:





|1. |  | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the
Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. |  | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Dated: August 7, 2002


/S/    JAY M. SHORT





/S/    KARIN EASTHAMJay M. Short, Ph.D. Chief Executive Officer





Karin Eastham Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 99.2 March 15, 2005 The Bank of New York
101 Barclay Street, 12 East
New York, New York 10286
Attention: Corporate Trust Trustee Administrators Chase Manhattan Bank, USA, National Association
500 Stanton Christiana Rd., 3rd Floor/DPS4
Newark, Delaware 19713
Attention: Institutional Trust Services Re:
    
    Superior Wholesale Inventory Financing Trust IX (Issuer)Annual Statement as to Compliance
 Ladies and Gentlemen: Reference is made to
Section 3.9 of the Trust Indenture dated as of May 19, 2004 between the Issuer, The
Bank of New York, as Indenture Trustee, and General Motors Acceptance Corporation, as Servicer (the
Indenture) and Section 4.1 of the Trust Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 19, 2004
between the Issuer, General Motors Acceptance Corporation, as Servicer, and Wholesale Auto
Receivables Corporation, as Seller (the Trust Sale and Servicing Agreement). The undersigned does hereby certify that:  a.
    A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of May 19, 2004 through December
31, 2004, and of its performance under the Indenture, the Trust Sale and Servicing Agreement,
and the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under his supervision, andb.
    To his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Indenture, the Trust Sale and Servicing Agreement, and the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout such period. Very truly
            yours,/s/ J. B.
            Van Orman, Jr.Vice President
             Finance and Chief Financial Officerof GMAC
            North American Operations
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF      2002**

|   | 1. | The                Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Annual Report fairly represents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and result of operations                of the                Registrant. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                              |                                                          |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                              | /s/ Steven                    M.                    Hill |
|   | Steven                    M. Hill                                                                 |
|   | Chief                      Financial Officer,MACRO Securities Depositor,                      LLC |

----
#### Henry Ward *v.*R. G. Samuels, etc., and Henry Ward *v.*A. W. Dudley, etc.

Judicial Sales — Pleading—Proper Allegation Must Appear in Petition.

It is not alleged that the note sued on was given as part of the price of the land, nor is it alleged that the payees in the note had or were able to convey the title, even if it had been alleged that there was a lien on the land to secure the debt, and there is not an allegation in any of the pleadings in the suit with which this one is consolidated authorizing the judgment.

APPEALS PROM McLEAN CIRCUIT COURT.

March 12, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

There are two appeals upon this record, in the one of Ward against Samuels, etc., the last and only final order made is in these words: .

The parties appeared by their attorneys, and on motion this cause is stricken from the docket. The only rational or legitimate interpretation that we can give this order is that the 'cause wa-s stricken from the docket, on motion of the attorneys for the parties, which must be a consent order, and having been so entered, appellant can not now avail himself of any error that may have been committed in the progress of the case to reverse a judgment which he himself consented to have entered. That judgment must therefore be affirmed.

As to the case of Ward against Dudley, etc., it is in quite a different condition; there are no allegations in the petition which authorizes a judgment to sell land. It is not alleged that the note sued on was given a part of the price of the land, nor is it alleged the payees in the note had or were able to con*225vey the title even if it had been alleged that there was a lien on land to secure the debt, and there is not an allegation in any of the pleadings in the suit of *Ward v. Samuels, etc.,*with which it was consolidated to authorize t'he judgment so that in any view of the case the judgment fon* a sale of land was wholly unauthorized. Wherefore the judgment for the sale of the land is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings. If the parties should offer on the return of the cause to amend their pleadings, permission -should be to do so.

*Johnson, for appellants.*

*James, for appellees.*
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mercari Communications Group, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Scott L. Mathis, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Scott L. MathisScott L. MathisTitle: Chief Executive OfficerDate: April 5, 2011








This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.