Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 221 / Monday, November 17, 2014 / Notices 68433 

1 Jordan Cove filed its application with the FERC 

on May 21, 2013 in Docket No. CP13–483–000, 

while Pacific Connector filed its application with 

the FERC on June 6, 2013 in Docket No. CP13–492– 

000. 

2The pronouns ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ refer to the 

environmental staff of the FERC’s Office of Energy 

Projects. 

3The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Fossil 

Energy issued an authorization on December 7, 

2011 allowing Jordan Cove to export LNG to FTA 

nations in DOE/FE Order 3041, and authorization 

to export to non-FTA nations on March 24, 2014 in 

DOE/FE Order 3413. Shipment would be by other 

party LNG vessels. 

Filed Date: 11/7/14. 

Accession Number: 20141107–5111. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/19/14. 

Docket Numbers: RP14–935–004. 

Applicants: Questar Overthrust 

Pipeline Company. 

Description: Compliance filing per 

154.203: Show Cause Order 

Supplemental Filing to be effective 6/

16/2014. 

Filed Date: 11/7/14. 

Accession Number: 20141107–5218. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/19/14. 

Docket Numbers: RP15–101–001. 

Applicants: Florida Gas Transmission 

Company, LLC. 

Description: Tariff Amendment per 

154.205(b): Amendment to RP15–101 

Rate Case to be effective 12/1/2014. 

Filed Date: 11/7/14. 

Accession Number: 20141107–5222. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/19/14. 

Any person desiring to protest in any 

of the above proceedings must file in 

accordance with Rule 211 of the 

Commission’s Regulations (18 CFR 

385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern 

time on the specified comment date. 

The filings are accessible in the 

Commission’s eLibrary system by 

clicking on the links or querying the 

docket number. 

eFiling is encouraged. More detailed 

information relating to filing 

requirements, interventions, protests, 

service, and qualifying facilities filings 

can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/

docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For 

other information, call (866) 208–3676 

(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. 

Dated: November 10, 2014. 

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2014–27117 Filed 11–14–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. EL15–17–000] 

Alterna Springerville LLC, LDVF1 TEP 

LLC, Wilmington Trust Company, 

William J. Wade v. Tucson Electric 

Power Company; Notice of Complaint 

Take notice that on November 7, 

2014, pursuant to sections 206 and 306 

of the Federal Power Act, 16 USC 824e 

and 825e and Rule 206 of the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission’s 

(Commission) Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206, Alterna 

Springerville LLC (Alterna), LDVF1 TEP 

LLC (LDVF1), Wilmington Trust 

Company, and William J. Wade 

(Complainants), filed a formal 

complaint against Tucson Electric 

Power Company (Respondent or TEP), 

alleging that the TEP is engaging in 

unjust, unreasonable, and unduly 

discriminatory and/or preferential 

behavior; in violation of TEP’s PreOrder No. 888 grandfathered contractual 

obligations and its Open Access 

Transmission Tariff with regard to 

expanding transmission service to 

Alterna and LDVF1. 

The Complainants certify that copies 

of the complaint were served on the 

contacts for the Respondent as listed on 

the Commission’s list of Corporate 

Officials. 

Any person desiring to intervene or to 

protest this filing must file in 

accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). 

Protests will be considered by the 

Commission in determining the 

appropriate action to be taken, but will 

not serve to make protestants parties to 

the proceeding. Any person wishing to 

become a party must file a notice of 

intervention or motion to intervene, as 

appropriate. The Respondent’s answer 

and all interventions, or protests must 

be filed on or before the comment date. 

The Respondent’s answer, motions to 

intervene, and protests must be served 

on the Complainants. 

The Commission encourages 

electronic submission of protests and 

interventions in lieu of paper using the 

‘‘eFiling’’ link at http://www.ferc.gov. 

Persons unable to file electronically 

should submit an original and 5 copies 

of the protest or intervention to the 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 

888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 

20426. 

This filing is accessible on-line at 

http://www.ferc.gov, using the 

‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for 

electronic review in the Commission’s 

Public Reference Room in Washington, 

DC. There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on 

the Web site that enables subscribers to 

receive email notification when a 

document is added to a subscribed 

docket(s). For assistance with any FERC 

Online service, please email 

FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call 

(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call 

(202) 502–8659. 

Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern 

Time on November 28, 2014. 

Dated: November 7, 2014. 

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2014–27094 Filed 11–14–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. CP13–483–000; Docket No. 

CP13–492–000] 

Jordan Cove Energy Project LP; 

Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline LP; 

Notice of Availability of the Draft 

Environmental Impact Statement for 

the Proposed Jordan Cove 

Liquefaction and Pacific Connector 

Pipeline Projects 

The staff of the Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission (FERC or 

Commission) has prepared a draft 

environmental impact statement (EIS) 

for the projects proposed by Jordan Cove 

Energy Project LP (Jordan Cove) and 

Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline LP 

(Pacific Connector) in the abovereferenced dockets.1 We 2 refer to the 

combined Jordan Cove and Pacific 

Connector facilities simply as the 

Project. The Project facilities would be 

located in Coos, Douglas, Jackson, and 

Klamath Counties, Oregon. 

Jordan Cove requested Commission 

authority to construct and operate an 

LNG export terminal on Coos Bay, that 

would have the capacity to produce 

about six million metric tons per annum 

of LNG, using feed stock of about 0.9 

billion cubic feet per day (Bcd/f) of 

natural gas, for shipment to either Free 

Trade Agreement (FTA) or non-FTA 

nations around the Pacific Rim.3 Pacific 

Connector requested a certificate of 

public convenience and necessity from 

the FERC authorizing the construction 

and operation of a pipeline between the 

Malin Hub in Klamath County, Oregon 

and the Jordan Cove terminal on Coos 

Bay in Coos County, Oregon. The Pacific 

Connector pipeline would have the 

design capacity to transport a total about 

1.07 Bcf/d of natural gas; with about 

0.04 Bcf/d reserved for Northwest 

Pipeline Company’s Grants Pass Lateral 

through the newly proposed Clark’s 

Branch Delivery Meter Station in 

Douglas County, Oregon. 

The draft EIS assesses the potential 

environmental effects of the 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
68434 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 221 / Monday, November 17, 2014 / Notices 

construction and operation of the 

Project in accordance with the 

requirements of the National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The 

FERC staff concludes that approval of 

the Project would result in some limited 

adverse environmental impacts. 

However, if the Project is constructed 

and operated in accordance with 

applicable laws and regulations, and 

with implementation of Jordan Cove’s 

and Pacific Connector’s proposed 

mitigation measures, and the additional 

mitigation measures recommended in 

this EIS, environmental impacts would 

be substantially reduced. 

The United States (U.S.) Department 

of Agriculture, Forest Service (Forest 

Service); U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; 

U.S. Department of Energy; U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency; U.S. 

Department of Homeland Security, 

Coast Guard; U.S. Department of the 

Interior, Bureau of Land Management 

(BLM), Bureau of Reclamation 

(Reclamation), and Fish and Wildlife 

Service; and the Pipeline and Hazardous 

Materials Safety Administration of the 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

participated as cooperating agencies in 

the preparation of the EIS. Cooperating 

agencies have jurisdiction by law or 

special expertise with respect to 

resources potentially affected by the 

proposal and participate in the NEPA 

analysis. The cooperating agencies may 

adopt and use the EIS for their 

regulatory purposes, and to satisfy 

compliance with the NEPA and other 

related federal environmental laws and 

regulations. Although the cooperating 

agencies provided input to the 

conclusions and recommendations 

presented in the EIS, the agencies will 

present their own conclusions and 

recommendations in their respective 

Records of Decision for the Project. 

Actions of the Forest Service, BLM, and 

Reclamation 

The BLM’s identified purpose of and 

need for the proposed action is to 

respond to a Right-of-Way Grant 

application submitted by Pacific 

Connector on February 25, 2013. The 

Secretary of the Interior has delegated 

authority to the BLM to grant a Rightof-Way in response to the Pacific 

Connector application for natural gas 

transmission on federal lands under the 

Mineral Leasing Act of 1920. Before 

issuing the Right-of-Way Grant, the BLM 

must receive the written concurrence of 

the other surface managing federal 

agencies (i.e., Reclamation and Forest 

Service) in accordance with Title 43 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 

2882.3(i). In addition, there is a need for 

the BLM and the Forest Service to 

amend affected Land Management Plans 

(LMP) to make provision for the Pacific 

Connector pipeline. Although 

Reclamation has facilities that would be 

affected by the Pacific Connector 

pipeline, it has not identified any 

agency-specific actions for analysis in 

the draft EIS. 

For the Forest Service, pursuant to 36 

CFR 219.17(b) (2012 Planning Rule as 

amended), the responsible official has 

elected to use the procedures of the 

1982 planning regulation for the 

proposed amendments to the Rogue 

River, Umpqua, and Winema National 

Forest LMPs related to the Pacific 

Connector pipeline. Under the Forest 

Service planning regulations (36 CFR 

219.10(f); 1982 Rule) there is a need for 

the Forest Service to determine the 

significance of the proposed 

amendments. The proposed 

amendments are specific to the Pacific 

Connector Pipeline Project. 

The following amendments have been 

proposed by the BLM and/or the Forest 

Service as part of the proposed action in 

FERC’s draft EIS: 

Amendment of BLM Coos Bay District, 

Roseburg District, Medford District, and 

Klamath Falls Resource Area of the 

Lakeview District Resource Management 

Plans (RMP) and the Umpqua National 

Forest, Rogue River National Forest, and 

Winema National Forest Land and 

Resource Management Plans (LRMP) 

BLM/FS–1—Applicable BLM and 

Forest Service LMPs would be amended 

to exempt certain known sites within 

the area of the proposed Pacific 

Connector pipeline from the 

Management Recommendations 

required by the 2001 ‘‘Record of 

Decision and Standards and Guidelines 

for Amendments to the Survey and 

Manage, Protection Buffer, and other 

Mitigation Measures Standards and 

Guidelines,’’ as modified in July 2011. 

Amendment of BLM Coos Bay District 

and Roseburg District RMPs 

BLM–1—The Coos Bay District and 

Roseburg District RMPs would be 

amended to waive the requirements to 

protect occupied, suitable, and potential 

habitat for the marbled murrelet 

(MAMU), as mapped by the BLM within 

the proposed Pacific Connector pipeline 

area. An estimated 75 acres of occupied, 

suitable, or potential MAMU habitat 

within the proposed Pacific Connector 

pipeline area would potentially be 

affected by the amendment on the 

Roseburg District. 

Amendments of BLM Roseburg District 

RMP 

BLM–2—The Roseburg District RMP 

would be amended to exempt the 

Pacific Connector Pipeline Project from 

the requirement to retain habitat in 

Known Owl Activity Centers at three 

locations. 

BLM–3—The Roseburg District RMP 

would be amended to change the 

designation of approximately 409 acres 

from the Matrix land allocation to the 

Late Successional Reserve (LSR) land 

allocation in Sections 32 and 34, 

Township (T).291⁄2 South (S), Range 

(R).7 West (W).; and Section 1, T.30S., 

R.7W., Willamette Meridian (W.M.) 

Oregon. 

Amendment of BLM Coos Bay District 

RMP 

BLM–4—The Coos Bay District RMP 

would be amended to change the 

designation of approximately 387 acres 

from the Matrix land allocation to the 

LSR land allocation in Sections 19 and 

29, T.28S., R.10W., W.M., Oregon. 

Amendments of the Umpqua National 

Forest LRMP 

UNF–1—The Umpqua National Forest 

LRMP would be amended to change the 

Standards and Guidelines for Fisheries 

to allow the removal of effective shading 

vegetation where perennial streams 

would be crossed by the Pacific 

Connector pipeline corridor. This 

change would potentially affect an 

estimated three acres of shading 

vegetation at four perennial stream 

crossings in the East Fork of Cow Creek 

from pipeline mileposts (MP) 109.0 to 

110.0 in Sections 16 and 21, T.32S., 

R.2W., W.M., Oregon. 

UNF–2—The Umpqua National Forest 

LRMP would be amended to change 

prescriptions C2–II and C2–IV and to 

allow the Pacific Connector pipeline 

corridor to cross Riparian Areas (i.e., 

Riparian Reserves) and run parallel to 

the East Fork of Cow Creek for 

approximately 0.1 mile between MPs 

109.7 and 109.8 in Section 21, T.32S., 

R.2W.,W. M., Oregon. This change 

would potentially affect approximately 

one acre of Riparian Reserve along the 

East Fork of Cow Creek. 

UNF–3—The Umpqua National Forest 

LRMP would be amended to waive 

limitations on the area affected by 

detrimental soil conditions from 

displacement and compaction within 

the proposed Pacific Connector pipeline 

corridor. Standards and Guidelines for 

Soils requires that not more than 20 

percent of the project area have 

detrimental compaction, displacement, 

or puddling after completion of a 

project. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 221 / Monday, November 17, 2014 / Notices 68435 

4The total length of the pipeline does not match 

the MPs, which have been retained from the 

original route proposed for the LNG import project 

in Docket No. CP07–441–000. Where realignments 

have been adopted into the proposed route, the MPs 

are designated with an ‘‘R.’’ In addition, the MPs 

are reversed, numbered from west to east, again as 

a reflection of the original pipeline design. Now, in 

the LNG export project in Docket No. CP13–492– 

000, the natural gas would flow west from the 

Malin Hub to Coos Bay, with the Pacific Connector 

pipeline beginning at the Klamath Compressor 

Station at MP 228.1 and terminating at the Jordan 

Cove Meter Station at MP 1.5R. 

UNF–4—The Umpqua National Forest 

LRMP would be amended to change the 

designation of approximately 588 acres 

from the Matrix land allocation to the 

LSR 223 land allocation in Sections 7, 

18, and 19, T.32S., R.2W., and Sections. 

13 and 24, T.32S., R.3W., W.M., Oregon. 

Amendments of the Rogue River 

National Forest LRMP 

RRNF–2—The Rogue River National 

Forest LRMP would be amended to 

change the Visual Quality Objective 

(VQO) in the area where the Pacific 

Connector pipeline corridor would cross 

Big Elk Road, at MP 161.4 in Section 16, 

T.37S., R.4E., W.M., Oregon, from 

Foreground Retention to Foreground 

Partial Retention and allow more time 

for the amended VQO to be attained. 

RRNF–3—The Rogue River National 

Forest LRMP would be amended to 

change the VQO in the vicinity of where 

the Pacific Connector pipeline corridor 

would cross the Pacific Crest Trail at 

MP 168.0 in Section 32, T.37S., 

R.5E.,W.M., Oregon, from Foreground 

Partial Retention to Modification and 

allow more time for the amended VQO 

to be attained. 

RRNF–4—The Rogue River National 

Forest LRMP would be amended to 

allow more time to meet the VQO along 

the Pacific Connector pipeline corridor 

between MPs 156.3 to 156.8 and 157.2 

to 157.5 in Sections 11 and 12, T.37S., 

R.3E., W.M., Oregon. Standards and 

Guidelines for Middleground Partial 

Retention require that VQOs for a given 

location be achieved within one year of 

completion of the project. 

Approximately 0.8 mile or 9 acres of 

Middleground Partial Retention VQO 

visible at distances of 0.75 to 5 miles 

from State Highway 140 would be 

affected by this amendment. 

RRNF–5—The Rogue River National 

Forest LRMP would be amended to 

allow the Pacific Connector pipeline 

corridor to cross lands subject to the 

Restricted Riparian Management 

Strategy standards and guidelines. This 

would potentially affect approximately 

2.5 acres associated with one perennial 

stream crossing of the South Fork of 

Little Butte Creek at MP 162.45 in 

Section 16, T.37S., R.4E.,W.M., Oregon. 

RRNF–6—The Rogue River National 

Forest LRMP would be amended to 

waive limitations on areas affected by 

detrimental soil conditions from 

displacement and compaction within 

the proposed Pacific Connector pipeline 

corridor in all affected Management 

Strategies. 

RRNR–7—The Rogue River National 

Forest LRMP would be amended to 

change the designation of approximately 

512 acres from the Matrix land 

allocation to the LSR land allocation in 

Sections 32, T.36S., R.3E., W.M., 

Oregon. 

Amendments of the Winema National 

Forest LRMP 

WNF–1—The Winema National 

Forest LRMP would be amended to 

change the Standards and Guidelines for 

Management Area 3 (MA–3) to allow for 

development of the Pacific Connector 

pipeline corridor in MA–3 from the 

Forest Boundary in Section 32, T.37S., 

R.5E., W.M., Oregon, to Clover Creek 

Road in Section 4, T.38S, R.5. E, W.M., 

Oregon. Standards and Guidelines for 

MA–3 state that it is currently an 

avoidance area for new utility corridors. 

This amendment would apply to a 

portion of the proposed Pacific 

Connector pipeline corridor that would 

be approximately 1.5 miles long and 

occupy approximately 17 acres. 

WNF–2—The Winema National 

Forest LRMP would be amended to 

allow more time to achieve the VQO 

where the Pacific Connector pipeline 

corridor would cross the Dead Indian 

Memorial Highway at MP 168.8 in 

Section 33, T.37S., R.5E., W. M., 

Oregon. 

WNF–3—The Winema National 

Forest LRMP would be amended to 

allow more time to meet the VQO for 

Scenic Management, Foreground Partial 

Retention, where the Pacific Connector 

pipeline corridor would be adjacent to 

Clover Creek Road from MPs 170.0 to 

175.0 in Sections 2, 3, 4, 11, and 12, 

T.38S., R.5E.,W.M., Oregon, and 

Sections 7 and 18, T.38S., R.6E., W.M., 

Oregon. This amendment would be 

applicable to approximately 50 acres of 

the proposed Pacific Connector pipeline 

corridor. 

WNF–4—The Winema National 

Forest LRMP would be amended to 

waive restrictions on detrimental soil 

conditions from displacement and 

compaction within the proposed Pacific 

Connector pipeline corridor in all 

affected management areas. 

WNF–5—The Winema National 

Forest LRMP would be amended to 

waive restrictions on detrimental soil 

conditions from displacement and 

compaction within the proposed Pacific 

Connector pipeline corridor within 

Management Area 8, Riparian Area 

(MA–8). This amendment would be 

applicable to approximately 0.5 mile or 

an estimated 9.6 acres of MA–8. 

Standards and Guidelines for Soil and 

Water within MA–8 require that not 

more than 10 percent of the total 

riparian zone in an activity area be in a 

detrimental soil condition upon the 

completion of a project. 

Proposed Project Facilities 

The EIS addresses the potential 

environmental effects of the 

construction and operation of the 

following major Project facilities: 

Jordan Cove 

• access channel, marine slip, and 

LNG vessel and tug boat berths; 

• LNG loading platform and 

cryogenic transfer pipeline; 

• two LNG storage tanks (each with a 

capacity of 160,000 cubic meters); 

• four liquefaction trains (each with a 

capacity of 1.5 MMTPA); 

• one-mile-long utility corridor and 

access road between the LNG terminal 

and the power plant; 

• pipeline gas conditioning plant 

(consisting of two feed gas and 

dehydration trains with a combined 

throughput of 1.0 Bcf/d of natural gas); 

and 

• 420-megawatt South Dunes Power 

Plant. 

Pacific Connector 

• 232-mile-long, 36-inch-in-diameter 

underground welded-steel pipeline 

extending from the Klamath Compressor 

Station near Malin, Oregon to the Jordan 

Cove LNG terminal at Coos Bay; 

• 41,000-horsepower Klamath 

Compressor Station at milepost (MP) 

228.1,4 in Klamath County, Oregon; 

• two receipt meter stations 

(Klamath-Beaver and Klamath-Eagle) at 

the interconnections with the existing 

Gas Transmission Northwest and Ruby 

pipelines within the Klamath 

Compressor Station; 

• Clarks Branch Delivery Meter 

Station at MP 71.5, in Douglas County, 

Oregon, at the interconnection with the 

existing Northwest Pipeline Grants Pass 

Lateral; 

• Jordan Cove Delivery Meter Station 

at MP 1.5R, in Coos County, Oregon, at 

the interconnection with the Jordan 

Cove LNG terminal; 

• 17 mainline block valves located 

within the pipeline right-of-way or colocated at aboveground facilities; 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
68436 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 221 / Monday, November 17, 2014 / Notices 

5A pig is an internal pipeline cleaning and 

inspection tool. 

6See the previous discussion on the methods for 

filing comments. 

• five pig 5 launcher or receiver units, 

co-located with other aboveground 

facilities; and 

• gas control communication system, 

including 11 radio towers co-located at 

other facilities. 

Availability of the Draft EIS 

The FERC staff mailed copies of the 

draft EIS to federal, state, and local 

government representatives and 

agencies; elected officials; 

environmental groups and regional nongovernment organizations; interested 

Indian tribes; potentially affected 

landowners; commenters; newspapers 

and libraries in the project area; and 

parties to the proceeding. Paper copy 

versions of this EIS were mailed to those 

specifically requesting them; all others 

received a compact disk version. In 

addition, the draft EIS is available for 

public viewing on the FERC’s Web site 

(www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link. 

A limited number of copies are available 

for distribution and public inspection 

at: Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission, Public Reference Room, 

888 First Street NE., Room 2A, 

Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502–8371. 

Commenting on the Draft EIS 

Any person wishing to comment on 

the draft EIS may do so. To ensure 

consideration of your comments on the 

Project in the final EIS, it is important 

that the Commission receive your 

comments on or before February 13, 

2015. 

For your convenience, there are four 

methods you can use to submit your 

comments to the Commission. In all 

instances, please reference the Project 

docket numbers (CP13–483–000 and 

CP13–492–000) with your submission. 

The Commission encourages electronic 

filing of comments and has expert staff 

available to assist you at (202) 502–8258 

or efiling@ferc.gov. Please carefully 

follow these instructions so that your 

comments are properly recorded. 

(1) You can file your comments 

electronically using the eComment 

feature on the Commission’s Web site 

(www.ferc.gov) under the link to 

Documents and Filings. This is an easy 

method for submitting brief, text-only 

comments on a project; 

(2) You can file your comments 

electronically by using the eFiling 

feature on the Commission’s Web site 

(www.ferc.gov) under the link to 

Documents and Filings. With eFiling, 

you can provide comments in a variety 

of formats by attaching them as a file 

with your submission. New eFiling 

users must first create an account by 

clicking on ‘‘eRegister.’’ If you are filing 

a comment on a particular project, 

please select ‘‘Comment on a Filing’’ as 

the filing type; or 

(3) You can file a paper copy of your 

comments by mailing them to the 

following address: Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission, 888 First Street NE., Room 

1A, Washington, DC 20426. 

(4) In lieu of sending written or 

electronic comments, the Commission 

invites you to attend one of the public 

meetings its staff will conduct in the 

project area to receive comments on the 

draft EIS. We encourage interested 

groups and individuals to attend and 

present oral comments on the draft EIS. 

Transcripts of the meetings will be 

available for review in eLibrary under 

the Project docket numbers. All 

meetings will begin at 6:00 p.m. and are 

scheduled as follows: 

Date Location 

Monday, December 8, 2014 ..................... Southwest Oregon Community College, Hales Performing Arts Center, 1988 Newmark Ave., Coos 

Bay, OR 97420, 541–888–7250. 

Tuesday, December 9, 2014 .................... Umpqua Community College, Lang Center, 1140 Umpqua College Rd., Roseburg, OR 97470, 541– 

440–4705. 

Wednesday, December 10, 2014 ............. Seven Feathers Casino-Hotel & Convention Center, 146 Chief Miwaleta Ln., Canyonville, OR 97417, 

800–548–8461 ext. 1218. 

Thursday, December 11, 2014 ................. Central Medford High School, 815 S. Oakdale Ave., Medford, OR 97501, 541–842–3669, 541–842– 

3680. 

Friday, December 12, 2014 ...................... Oregon Institute of Technology, College Union Auditorium, 3201 Campus Dr., Klamath Falls, OR 

97601, 541–895–1032. 

Saturday, December 13, 2014 .................. Malin Community Hall, 2307 Front St., Malin, OR 97632, 541–723–4141. 

Interventions 

Any person seeking to become a party 

to the proceeding must file a motion to 

intervene pursuant to Rule 214 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedures (18 CFR Part 385.214).6 Only 

intervenors have the right to seek 

rehearing of the Commission’s decision. 

The Commission grants affected 

landowners and others with 

environmental concerns intervenor 

status upon showing good cause by 

stating that they have a clear and direct 

interest in these proceedings which no 

other party can adequately represent. 

Simply filing environmental comments 

will not give you intervenor status, but 

you do not need intervenor status to 

have your comments considered. 

Questions 

Additional information about the 

project is available from the 

Commission’s Office of External Affairs, 

at (866) 208–FERC, or on the FERC Web 

site (www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary 

link. Click on the eLibrary link, click on 

‘‘General Search,’’ and enter the docket 

number excluding the last three digits in 

the Docket Number field (i.e., CP13–483 

and CP13–492). Be sure you have 

selected an appropriate date range. For 

assistance, please contact FERC Online 

Support at FercOnline Support@ferc.gov 

or toll free at (866) 208–3676; for TTY, 

contact (202) 502–8659. The eLibrary 

link also provides access to the texts of 

formal documents issued by the 

Commission, such as orders, notices, 

and rulemakings. 

In addition, the Commission offers a 

free service called eSubscription that 

allows you to keep track of all formal 

issuances and submittals in specific 

dockets. This can reduce the amount of 

time you spend researching proceedings 

by automatically providing you with 

notification of these filings, document 

summaries, and direct links to the 

documents. Go to www.ferc.gov/docsfiling/esubscription.asp. 

Dated: November 7, 2014. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2014–27053 Filed 11–14–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES