69046 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 224 / Thursday, November 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

1See Import Administration; Change of Agency 

Name, 78 FR 62417 (Oct. 22, 2013). 

(when the final rule for imidazolines 

was published) through September 8, 

2014, to update the injury and incident 

data discussed in the final rule. This 

search revealed 79 cases involving 

decongestants/nose drops, nose sprays, 

nose drops, and naphazoline eye drops. 

These cases were reviewed for incidents 

involving imidazolines used in nose 

drops, nose sprays and eye drops, and 

17 cases were identified—13 involving 

eye drops, and four involving nasal 

drops or spray. One of these cases 

involved a 3-year old female who 

ingested eye drops and was 

hospitalized. The remaining patients 

were treated and released, except for 

one child who left the emergency room 

without being seen by medical 

personnel. Fifteen of the 17 cases 

occurred during the 12-month period 

from December 2012 to December 2013, 

the one year period prior to the effective 

date of the rule. Two cases occurred 

during the most recent 9-month period 

during which the stay of enforcement 

was in effect. Neither of the two most 

recent cases resulted in the 

hospitalization of the child. Moreover, 

the narratives describing these two cases 

did not provide sufficient information to 

determine whether the incident 

products were in CR packaging, or 

whether the circumstances of the 

incident suggest that CR packaging 

would likely have prevented the 

ingestion. 

CPSC staff also searched the 

Consumer Product Safety Risk 

Management System (CPSRMS) for 

reports of incidents received by the 

Commission involving household 

products containing imidazolines. The 

search was conducted on September 9, 

2014, and included all incidents for 

which reports had been received from 

December 2012 to September 9, 2014. 

One report involving eye drops that was 

received arose from an investigation of 

one of the 17 NEISS cases mentioned 

above. No other reports involving eye 

drops, nasal sprays, or nasal drops were 

received during this time period. 

IV. Extension of Stay of Enforcement 

Twelve firms that manufacture and/or 

package imidazoline-containing 

products covered by the final rule 

provided timely notice to the 

Commission of their intent to avail 

themselves of the conditional stay of 

enforcement authorized in the final rule. 

These firms have also met the other 

conditions of the stay, i.e., providing 

quarterly status reports during the 1- 

year stay of enforcement that include 

the information specified in the final 

rule. As discussed above, eight of these 

firms have advised CPSC staff that they 

likely will be unable to package some of 

their imidazoline products in CR 

packaging by the date that the current 

conditional stay of enforcement is set to 

expire. Four of the five firms that 

manufacture ophthalmic products and 

that have met the requirements to 

participate in the stay have advised staff 

that the firms need additional time to 

produce their products in CR packaging. 

Four of seven firms that manufacture 

nasal products and that have met the 

requirements to participate in the stay 

have advised staff that the firms need 

additional time to produce either 

squeeze spray or metered pump spray 

bottles for their imidazoline products. 

A review of injury data reveals a 

significant reduction in NEISS cases 

since the effective date of the final rule. 

Although there was an average of 

approximately 13 NEISS cases of 

imidazoline ingestions by children 

under 5 years of age, per year, from 

January 1997 to December 2013, two 

cases were found for the most recent 9- 

month period. Furthermore, there have 

been no CPSRMS reports of incidents 

involving household products 

containing imidazolines since 

publication of the final rule. 

The Commission finds that the 

circumstances described above warrant 

an extension of the conditional stay of 

enforcement. All but one of the eight 

firms covered by the conditional stay of 

enforcement that have requested 

additional time to comply with the rule 

have advised Compliance staff that their 

products will comply with the rule by 

May 2015 at the latest. Therefore, we 

have determined that the duration of the 

extension of the conditional stay of 

enforcement will be 6 months from the 

date of the expiration of the conditional 

stay, or June 10, 2015. The stay will 

apply only to firms that are subject to 

the current conditional stay of 

enforcement and that continue to meet 

the reporting conditions set forth in the 

final rule preamble as explained above. 

One firm covered by the stay of 

enforcement has told Compliance staff 

that the firm’s products will not comply 

with the final rule by May 2015. The 

Office of Compliance will consider 

requests for an additional temporary 

extension of the stay of enforcement on 

a case-by-case basis, if a firm covered by 

the extended stay of enforcement 

anticipates difficulties meeting the June 

10, 2015 date. A request for time beyond 

June 10, 2015 must be submitted to the 

Office of Compliance before the 

expiration of the extended conditional 

stay of enforcement. The request must 

specify the period of time needed to 

produce CR packaging, explain the 

reasons why additional time is needed, 

and provide a timeline or schedule 

outlining the steps the firm will take to 

comply with the final rule. 

Dated: November 14, 2014. 

Todd A. Stevenson, 

Secretary, Consumer Product Safety 

Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2014–27378 Filed 11–19–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6355–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

19 CFR Part 351 

[Docket No.: 141104924–4924–01] 

RIN 0625–AB01 

Enforcement and Compliance; Change 

of Electronic Filing System Name 

AGENCY: International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The International Trade 

Administration’s Enforcement and 

Compliance Unit publishes this rule to 

announce a change in the name of 

Enforcement and Compliance’s 

electronic filing system from ‘‘IA 

ACCESS’’ to ‘‘ACCESS.’’ Consistent 

with this action, this rule makes 

appropriate conforming changes in part 

351 of title 19 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations. This action is being taken 

to ensure that the regulations reflect the 

change in nomenclature from Import 

Administration to Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

DATES: This rule is effective November 

24, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Laura Merchant, IT Manager, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

Telephone (202) 482–0367; Shana 

Hofstetter, Attorney, Office of Chief 

Counsel for Trade Enforcement and 

Compliance, Telephone: (202) 482– 

3414. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

October 1, 2013, as part of an internal 

consolidation within the International 

Trade Administration, the name of the 

Import Administration was changed to 

Enforcement and Compliance to reflect 

the unit’s new operational mandate.1

This rule updates the regulations to 

reflect the new name of Enforcement 

and Compliance’s electronic filing 

system from ‘‘IA ACCESS’’ to 

‘‘ACCESS’’. This rule changes all 


rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 224 / Thursday, November 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 69047 

references to IA ACCESS (Import 

Administration Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System) to ACCESS 

(Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System) 

in 19 CFR 351.303. Upon the effective 

date of this rule, the Web site is changed 

from https://iaaccess.trade.gov to 

https://access.trade.gov and the Help 

Desk email is changed from ia_access@

trade.gov to access@trade.gov. 

Savings Provision 

This rule shall constitute notice that 

all references to IA ACCESS (Import 

Administration Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System) in any 

documents, statements, or other 

communications, in any form or media, 

and whether made before, on, or after 

the effective date of this rule, shall be 

deemed to be references to ACCESS 

(Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System). 

Rulemaking Requirements 

1. This final rule has been determined 

to be not significant for purposes of 

review under Executive Order 12866. 

2. This rule does not impose 

information collection and 

recordkeeping requirements. 

Consequently, it need not be reviewed 

by the Office of Management and 

Budget under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

3. This rule does not contain policies 

with Federalism implications as that 

term is defined in Executive Order 

13132. 

4. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), good 

cause exists to waive the provisions of 

the Administrative Procedure Act (5 

U.S.C. 553) otherwise requiring notice 

of proposed rulemaking and the 

opportunity for public participation. 

This rule involves a nonsubstantive 

change to the regulations to update the 

name of Enforcement and Compliance’s 

electronic filing system. This rule does 

not impact any substantive rights or 

obligations. The change implemented by 

this rule needs to be implemented 

without further delay to avoid the 

confusion caused by the reference to the 

previous organization name that is no 

longer contained in the name of the 

system, the Web site, and the Help Desk 

email address. No other law requires 

that a notice of proposed rulemaking 

and an opportunity for public comment 

be given for this final rule. Accordingly, 

this rule is issued in final form. 

For the reasons listed above, the 

provision of the Administrative 

Procedure Act requiring a 30-day delay 

in effectiveness is also waived for good 

cause pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) as 

this rule involves a nonsubstantive 

change to the regulations to update the 

name of Enforcement and Compliance’s 

electronic filing system. This rule does 

not contain any provisions that require 

regulated entities to come into 

compliance and failure to implement it 

immediately might cause confusion. 

5. Because a notice of proposed 

rulemaking and an opportunity for 

public comment are not required to be 

given for this rule under 5 U.S.C. or by 

any other law, the analytical 

requirements of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.) are 

not applicable. Accordingly, no 

regulatory flexibility analysis is required 

and none has been prepared. 

List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 351 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Antidumping, Business and 

industry, Cheese, Confidential business 

information, Countervailing duties, 

Freedom of information, Investigations, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

For the reasons set out in the 

preamble, 19 CFR part 351 is amended 

as follows: 

PART 351—ANTIDUMPING AND 

COUNTERVAILING DUTIES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 351 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 1202 

note; 19 U.S.C. 1303 note; 19 U.S.C. 1671 et 

seq.; and 19 U.S.C. 3538. 

§ 351.303 [AMENDED] 

■ 2. Amend § 351.303 to remove ‘‘IA 

ACCESS’’ wherever it appears and add 

in its place ‘‘ACCESS’’. 

Dated: November 17, 2014. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2014–27530 Filed 11–19–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Federal Bureau of Investigation 

28 CFR Part 25 

[Docket No. FBI 152; AG Order No. 3477– 

2014] 

RIN 1110–AA27 

National Instant Criminal Background 

Check System Regulation 

AGENCY: Federal Bureau of 

Investigation, Department of Justice. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The United States Department 

of Justice (‘‘the Department’’) is 

publishing this final rule to amend the 

regulations implementing the National 

Instant Criminal Background Check 

System (‘‘NICS’’) pursuant to the Brady 

Handgun Violence Prevention Act 

(‘‘Brady Act’’). This final rule authorizes 

tribal criminal justice agencies to access 

the NICS Index for purposes of issuing 

firearm-related permits and licenses, 

authorizes criminal justice agencies to 

access the NICS Index for purposes of 

disposing of firearms in their 

possession, and updates the storage 

location of NICS Audit Log records 

relating to denied transactions. 

DATES: This rule is effective on January 

20, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sean Ragan, Federal Bureau of 

Investigation, National Instant Criminal 

Background Check System Section, 

Module A–3, 1000 Custer Hollow Road, 

Clarksburg, West Virginia 26306–0147, 

(304) 625–3500. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule 

finalizes the proposal in the Federal 

Register on January 28, 2013 (78 FR 

5757). The Federal Bureau of 

Investigation (‘‘FBI’’) accepted 

comments on the proposed rule from 

interested parties until March 29, 2013, 

and received 38 comments. With the 

exception of deleting the requirement 

for a form as explained below, the 

proposed rule is adopted as final. 

Significant Comments or Changes: 

On January 28, 2013, the Department 

published a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (‘‘NPRM’’) that proposed 

three changes to the FBI’s NICS 

regulations. The proposed changes were 

to authorize tribal criminal justice 

agencies to access the NICS Index for 

purposes of issuing firearm-related 

permits and licenses; authorize criminal 

justice agencies to access the NICS 

Index for purposes of disposing of 

firearms in their possession; and to 

update the storage location of NICS 

Audit Log records relating to denied 

transactions. The proposed changes 

balance the Brady Act’s mandate that 

the Department protect legitimate 

privacy interests of law-abiding firearm 

transferees (Pub. L. 103–159, section 

103 (h)) and the Department’s obligation 

to enforce the Brady Act (Id., section 

103 (b)) and prevent prohibited persons 

from receiving firearms. Comments 

received for each of the three proposals 

are addressed below. 


rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES