alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2NOVELLUS SYSTEMS, INC.CERTIFICATIONIn connection with the periodic report of Novellus Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended July 2, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),I, John Chenault, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as ofthe date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United StatesCode, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for theperiods indicated.     Dated: August 12, 2005 By:  /s/ John Chenault    John Chenault    Vice President and Chief
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1681

MIYA GREENE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:21-cv-00059-CCE-JLW)

Submitted: November 22, 2022 Decided: November 28, 2022

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Miya Greene, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Jared Littman, SOCIAL SECURITY 

ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1681 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/28/2022 Pg: 1 of 3
2

PER CURIAM:

Miya Greene appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the 

magistrate judge and upholding the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) denial of Greene’s

application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. 

The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1)(B). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised 

Greene that failure to file timely, specific objections to this recommendation could waive 

appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. After Greene 

did not file such objections within the allotted time, the district court accepted the 

magistrate judge’s recommendation and affirmed the ALJ’s decision. However, on the 

same day that the district court issued its order, Green filed a “[m]otion to allow opposing 

motion” and a “[r]esponse [t]o [o]ppose [m]otion.” The district court did not rule on those 

filings before Greene noted this appeal.*

Whether Greene has forfeited appellate review of the district court’s order turns on 

the proper construction and disposition of those documents. We therefore remand to the 

district court for the limited purpose of determining whether Greene’s filings are properly 

construed as her objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation and a motion for an 

extension of time to file those objections and, if so, for the court to consider those filings 

* Although the district court issued an order related to these filings after Greene 

noted this appeal, it is not apparent that the court had jurisdiction to do so. See, e.g., Doe 

v. Public Citizen, 749 F.3d 246, 258 (4th Cir. 2014).

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1681 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/28/2022 Pg: 2 of 3
3

in the first instance. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for 

further consideration.

REMANDED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1681 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/28/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.1 - SECTION 1350



APD ANTIQUITIES, INC.



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with the periodic report of APD ANTIQUITIES, INC., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, CINDY K. SWANK, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



Date: May 12, 2009



| |     |                  
| | --- | -----------------
| | By: | /s/Cindy K. Swank
| |     | Cindy K. Swank   



In connection with the periodic report of APD ANTUQUITIES, INC., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, EDWARD WONG WAH ON, Secretary of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



Date: May 12 , 2009



| |     |                       
| | --- | ----------------------
| | By: | /s/ Edward Wong Wah On
| |     | Edward Wong Wah On
9726.

#### Strickland v. Hamilton.

Decided April 4, 1919.

Petition for certiorari; from Camden superior court—Judge Highsmith. Marcli 20, 1918.

*D. S. Atkinson,*for plaintiff in error. *II. Roy Lang,*contra.

Broyles, P. J.

1. “The writ of certiorari will not lie to correct errors committed by a justice of the peace in proceedings under the Penal Code [1910], §§ 1331 et seq., against the putative father of a bastard child, where judgment is rendered requiring the defendant to give security for the support of the child, and binding him over to the superior court upon his failure to give such security. Such is the ruling in the ease of *Hyden*v. *State,*40 *Ga.*476; and upon the formal review of that decision” the Supreme Court “declines to overrule it.” *Strickland*v. *Hamilton,*148 *Ga.*820 (98 S. E. 471).

2. The foregoing ruling was made by the Supreme Court upon a question certified by this court in this case; and it follows therefrom that the judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to sanction the certiorari.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.*
Executive Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.6.1 
  
 As of August 29, 2005 
  
 Jim Sinegal 
 999 Lake Drive 
 Issaquah, WA 98027 
  
 Dear Jim: 
  
 This letter agreement confirms the terms of your employment with Costco Wholesale Corporation (the “Company”): 
  

	1.	 	Employment. The Company employs you as its President and Chief Executive Officer. 

  

	2.	 	Employment Term. The terms of this letter agreement cover one year, beginning August 29, 2005, and coinciding with the Company’s fiscal year 2006, unless otherwise
terminated as provided below. The parties may renew this letter agreement from year-to-year upon agreement. 

  

	3.	 	Salary and Benefits. 

  

	 	(a)	 	You will receive a base salary of $350,000 for fiscal year 2006. The base salary will be paid to you in accordance with the Company’s standard payroll practices.


  

	 	(b)	 	You will be eligible for a bonus of up to $200,000. The amount of any bonus will be determined by the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee, and will be paid to you in
accordance with the Company’s standard practices. 

  

	 	(c)	 	You will be eligible for a stock option grant under the Company’s stock option plan. The Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee will determine the amount of any
grant. 

  

	 	(d)	 	All payments to you will be subject to withholding for taxes and other applicable withholding requirements. 

  

	 	(e)	 	You will be eligible to participate in the Company’s employee benefit programs, in accordance with the terms and conditions of those programs. 

  

	4.	 	Termination. The Company will have the right to terminate your employment at any time for “cause,” as determined under applicable law and policies of the Company.
You may terminate your employment at any time upon not less than sixty (60) days prior written notice. 

  

	5.	 	Miscellaneous. This letter agreement represents our complete agreement on these subjects. We can only amend this letter agreement by signing a written amendment. This letter
will be governed by Washington law in all respects. 

  
 If you agree with the terms contained in this letter, please sign the enclosed copy of this letter and return it to me. 
  

			
	 Sincerely,

	
	 Compensation Committee,
 Board of
Directors,
 Costco Wholesale Corporation

		
	 By:
	 	/s/    TONY JAMES        
	 	 	Hamilton E. James
	 	 	Director


  

			
	 Acknowledged and agreed:

		
	 By:
	 	/s/    JAMES D. SINEGAL        
	 	 	James D. Sinegal
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of NexGen Biofuels Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.
Ram Ajjarapu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, following due inquiry, I believe that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company. and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                         NEXGEN BIOFUELS LTD.

November 13, 2008                        By: /s/ J. Ram Ajjarapu
                                         -----------------------
                                         J. RAM AJJARAPU
                                         CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6585

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RICHARD L. BRYANT, a/k/a Pumpkin, a/k/a Rock,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. (2:92-cr-00088-6)

Submitted: September 18, 2020 Decided: October 2, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard L. Bryant, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Richard L. Bryant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his “Emergency 

Motion to Reopen Petition Under First Step Act of 2018 Based on Extraordinary and 

Compelling Circumstances Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(1)(A)(i).” This court may 

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and 

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan 

Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). “Ordinarily, a district court order is not final until it 

has resolved all claims as to all parties.” Porter v. Zook, 803 F.3d 694, 696 (4th Cir. 2015) 

(internal quotation marks omitted).

Our review of the record reveals that the district court did not adjudicate all of the 

claims raised in Bryant’s motion. Id. at 696-97. Specifically, the court failed to address

Bryant’s claim that his heightened susceptibility to COVID-19 is an extraordinary and 

compelling reason justifying compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). 

We conclude that the order Bryant seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable 

interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction 

and remand to the district court for consideration of the unresolved claim. Id. at 699. We 

express no view as to the merits of the claim. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

 DISMISSED AND REMANDED
9734.

#### Dean *v.*Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company.

Broyles, P. J.

The evidence showed that the homicide sued for resulted from the running of one of the defendant’s trains, and raised the presumption that the defendant was negligent in each and every respect alleged in the petition. This presumption, however, was completely rebutted by other evidence elicited from the plaintiff’s witnesses. This evidence disproved all of the proximate acts of the defendant’s negligence as alleged in the petition, and the court did not" err in awarding a nonsuit.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth, J., concurs. Stephens, J., not presiding.*

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

Broyles, P. J.

Even if (as contended by counsel for plaintiff in error in the motion for a rehearing, but which is not conceded by this court) the evidence of the plaintiff’s witnesses did not disprove *all*of the proximate acts of the defendant’s negligence as alleged in the petition, but on the contrary affirmatively established 'some of these acts, it also clearly and indisputably showed that, by the exercise of ordinary care, the plaintiff’s son, for whose homicide the action was brought, could have avoided the consequences of the defendant’s negligence. Accordingly, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, and the court did not err in awarding a nonsuit. *White*v. *Central Railroad &c. Co.,*83 *Ga.*595 (10 S. E. 273); *Jenkins*v. *Central Railroad &c. Co.,*89 *Ga.*756 (15 S. E. 655) ; *Central Railroad &c. Co.*v. *Newman,*94 *Ga.*560 (21 S. E. 219); *Comer*v. *Shaw,*98 *Ga.*543 (25 S. E. 733); *Gordon*v. *Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.,*21 *Ga. App.*812 (95 S. E. 311); *104*Southern Ry. Co.*v. *Hogan,*131 *Ga.*157 (62 S. E. 64); *Moore*v. *Southern Ry. Co.,*136 *Ga.*872 (72 S. E. 403), and eases there cited.

Decided November 23, 1918.

Rehearing denied December 13, 1918.

Action for damages; from Early superior court—Judge Worrill. April 2, 1918.

*Glessner & Collins,*for plaintiff.

*A. H. Gray, Pope & Bennet,*for defendant.

*Rehearing denied.*

*Bloodworth, J., concurs. Stephens, J., not presiding.*
**Exhibit 10.17**March 31, 2006          To: **Holders of Metalico, Inc. November/December Series 7% Convertible Notes**Re: **Amendment to Notes**     You are a holder of a Convertible Note in the principal amount of $___issued byMetalico, Inc. on ___, 2004 (the “*Note”*). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwisedefined have the meanings attributed to them in the Note.     Under the terms of the Note:     The Payee will have the right, at its option, at any time up to and including theMaturity Date, to convert the outstanding principal balance of this Note (but not less thanthe outstanding balance) to shares of Common Stock of the Maker at the conversion price of$3.25 per share, promptly after surrender of the Note, accompanied by a written notice ofsuch conversion to the Maker.     We have been asked to amend the terms of the Note to allow for conversion of less than thefull outstanding principal balance upon the request of an individual holder with respect to suchholder’s Note. Upon conversion of any portion of the balance to Common Stock, Metalico would issueto such holder a replacement Note in the amount of the remaining unconverted balance subject to thesame terms (expressly including, without limitation, the Maturity Date and terms of mandatoryconversion) as set forth in such holder’s existing Note.     The Note also states, “[t]he terms of this Note may not be amended, waived, modified orsupplemented without the written consent of the Maker and the holders of all such ConvertibleNotes.” Please indicate your agreement with and consent to the amendment described above byexecuting this letter in the space provided below and returning it to my attention. Faxed or pdfversions of your signed letter are acceptable.     Thank you for your consideration and your continuing support of Metalico.ARNOLD S. GRABER***AGREEDthis _____ day of***                    ***, 2006:***       Name of Noteholder:                  Signature: [By]:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 68731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27316]



[[Page 68731]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Commission 
will host the SEC Government-Business Forum on Small Business Capital 
Formation on Thursday, November 20, 2014, beginning at 9:00 a.m., in 
the auditorium of the Commission's headquarters at 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC. The forum will be open to the public and webcast on the 
SEC's Web site. Doors will open at 8:15 a.m. Visitors will be subject 
to security checks.
    The forum will include remarks by SEC Commissioners and panel 
discussions that Commissioners may attend. Panel topics will include 
secondary market liquidity for securities of small businesses and the 
definition of accredited investor.
    For further information, please contact the Office of the Secretary 
at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: November 13, 2014.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-27316 Filed 11-14-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION











Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING USA Annuity and Life
Insurance Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s
knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











May 7, 2010
            By: /s/
            Michael S. Smith(Date)
            
            Michael S. Smith
              President
Exhibit 4.37
 
 INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
 INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT Purple
Mountain Holding Ltd. Option
Holder Yue (Justin) Tang Tang Option Holder Parties eLong, Inc., Company
 RECITALS
 Options Shares
   Escrow Agreement
 NOW, THEREFORE
 Obligation to Indemnify Indemnified Party Claim Claims




---



##### 



Tax Taxes
 Notice of Claims Indemnitee Indemnitor Notice of Claim
 Recovery for Claims




---



##### 



Defense of Third Party Claims
 Notice of Inquiry; Top Up Payments
 Inquiry Inquiry Notice
 Top Up
Payment Potential Claim Amount




---



##### 



Pledge of Escrowed Shares Pledged Assets
 Remedies




---



##### 



The Company Appointed Attorney-in-Fact
 Termination of Right to Deliver Notices of Claims
 Notices
  justin@br-china.com




---



##### 



sami.farhad@corp.elong.com
 Entire Agreement and Modification
 Governing Law Arbitration Rules Principal Tribunal




---



##### 



Counterparts; Facsimile Signatures
 Further Assurances
 Binding Effect; Severability
 SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 THE COMPANY:eLong, Inc.By:
    
    /s/ Sami FarhadName:
    
    Sami FarhadTitle:
    
    General CounselOPTION HOLDER PARTIES:Purple Mountain Holding LtdBy:
    
    /s/ Justin TangName:
    
    Justin TangTitle:Yue (Justin) Tang/s/ Justin Tang
National Advisory Committee on Windstorm Impact 

Reduction (NACWIR) Member 

 

Walker S. Ashley, Ph.D., CCM

Professor, Department of Geography

Northern Illinois University

Dr. Ashley is an atmospheric scientist and physical geographer 

with broad expertise in the risks of severe windstorms to 

humans. He is a Professor in the Department of Geography at 

Northern Illinois University. He has a PhD in Geography from 

the University of Georgia, and is an American Meteorological 

Society (AMS) Certified Consulting Meteorologist and a 

Forensic Meteorologist. 

Dr. Ashley’s research covers risk assessment and risk reduction for 

multiple natural hazards including: 

- the increasing tornado risk due to growing populations and suburban sprawl,

- the increased risk associated with nighttime tornadoes,

- factors affecting mortality associated with tornadoes,

- factors affecting tornado paths, and 

- tornadoes and mobile homes.

He has published numerous peer-reviewed articles in journals such as Meteorological

Applications, Natural Hazards, Weather, Climate and Society, Weather and Forecasting, The 

Professional Geographer, and the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. The topics 

of his publications include societal factors leading to greater and more frequent weather 

disasters, observed and projected changes in U.S. tornado exposure, spatial-temporal 

characteristics of tornado path directions, estimating tornado impacts, changing dynamics of 

exposure and risk, tornado intensity assessments, fatalities associated with both convective and 

non-convective wind events, and the relationship between wind fatalities and warnings.

Dr. Ashley serves on the Scientific Steering Committee of the Verification of the Origins of 

Rotation in Tornadoes Experiment-Southeast (VORTEX-SE), a $5M/year joint National Oceanic 

and Atmospheric Administration/National Science Foundation (NOAA/NSF) research project 

studying tornadoes in the southeast U.S. He is also a member of the AMS Board of Societal 

Impacts, and previously served on the AMS Tornado Policy Statement Drafting Team. He is a 

recipient of the AMS Weather, Climate, and Society Editor’s Award.

In addition to his academic research, Dr. Ashley has worked to educate the public about tornado 

hazards and risks, including nighttime tornadoes, which are 2.4 times as likely to result in 

fatalities as those in the daytime. His study on that topic, published in Weather and Forecasting, 

suggests that the current warning systems that have led to overall declines in tornado death rates 

might not be adequate for overnight events.