alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.3



   Certification pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
           relating to Reports filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission by or on behalf of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2004-A
        -----------------------------------------------------------------

I, Neil M. Schloss, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed the following documents:

        a.  All reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports
            for Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2004-A filed by Ford Credit Auto
            Receivables Two LLC for the year ended December 31, 2004
            (the "8-K Reports"); and

        b.  The annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004
            (the "Annual Report", together with the 8-K Reports, the "Reports")
            for Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2004-A to be filed by Ford Credit
            Auto Receivables Two LLC;

2.      Based on my knowledge, the information in the Reports, taken as a whole,
        does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
        state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
        the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
        as of the last day of the period covered by the Annual Report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
        required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling
        and servicing or similar agreement, for inclusion in the Reports is
        included in the Reports;

4.      I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
        under the pooling and servicing or similar agreement and based upon my
        knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
        agreement, and except as disclosed in the Reports, the servicer has
        fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

5.      The Reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
        servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
        the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
        conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
        Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
        pooling and servicing or similar agreement, that is included in the
        Reports.

Date: March 7, 2005

                                    /s/ Neil M. Schloss
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    Neil M. Schloss
                                    Vice President and Assistant Treasurer
                                    Ford Motor Credit Company, as Servicer
                                    (Chief Servicing Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
HAVANA REPUBLIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FORM 10-QSB FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>


<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                        784,049
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  17,221
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                   710,122
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1,661,392
<PP&E>                                        701,104
<DEPRECIATION>                                288,489
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              2,767,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         487,048
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                 1,923,906
<COMMON>                                    4,968,173
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,611,422)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                2,767,705
<SALES>                                       247,364
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              247,364
<CGS>                                         116,080
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 347,191
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (202,329)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (202,329)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (202,329)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (202,329)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)



</TABLE>
exv10w2



 






Exhibit 10.2




FIRST AMENDMENT TO

CHAMPION EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     This is a FIRST AMENDMENT (“First Amendment”), effective as of this 1st day of August,
2005, to that certain employment agreement dated the 16th day of June, 2003 (the “Employment
Agreement”), by and between CHARLES F. CHAMPION (the “Executive”), and YOUBET.COM, INC., a
Delaware corporation, (the “Company”) (collectively, the “Parties”).



     WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the provisions of the Employment
Agreement.



     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements herein contained, the Company
and the Executive hereby agree as follows:



     1. Employment; Duties and Acceptance. Paragraph 1 of the Employment Agreement is
amended by adding the following to the Executive’s list of Duties:



          Duties.




          (o) Define the vision, direction, and goals of the Operations Division consistent with the
Company’s AOP and Strategic Plan.




          (p) Direct all operations of the Company.




          (q) Guide and direct the Operations Division in the development, production, promotion and
sale of the Company’s products and services.




          (r) Establish operating policies consistent with the Company’s broad policies and objectives,
and ensure their timely execution.




          (s) Ensure that the operating responsibilities, authorities and accountability of all direct
subordinates are defined and understood, and that they are aligned with the Company’s AOP and
Strategic Plan.




     2. The Executive acknowledges and agrees that the change to his duties under this First
Amendment does not serve as a basis for the Executive to claim that a “Good Reason” (as defined in
the Employment Agreement, Paragraph 7(e)) has occurred.



     3. This First Amendment will be effective as of the date first written above.



     4. Except to the extent noted, and as may be necessary to give full force and effect to the
foregoing, the Employment Agreement shall continue unchanged, in full force and effect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties hereunto has executed this First Amendment on the
date(s) indicated below.





	 	 	 
	YOUBET.COM, INC.

	 	 
	 
	/s/ Gary W. Sproule
	 	 
	 	 	 
	Name: Gary W. Sproule
	 	 
	Title: Chief Financial Officer
	 	 
	Date: August 1, 2005
	 	 









	 	 	 
	CHARLES F. CHAMPION

	 	 
	 
	/s/ Charles F. Champion
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	Date: August 1, 2005
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.333-133527; 333-146339; and 333-153499 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 18, 2009, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (which report expresses anunqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of a new accounting standard) and our report dated February 18, 2009, on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of NightHawk RadiologyHoldings, Inc. and subsidiaries appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Boise, ID 

February 18, 2009
Exhibit 10.6

                              Krovim, LLC
                             P.O. Box 339
                       Lawrence, New York 11559



June 28, 2005



North Shore Capital Advisors Corp.
20 Marlin Lane
Port Washington, New York 11050

Gentlemen:

     We hereby agree to lend you,  from time to time, up to a maximum of $25,000
outstanding  at any time upon your  written  request  to us. Any such loan shall
bear  interest at the rate of prime plus 2% per annum and shall be  repayable at
such time as shall be agreed by us at the time of the drawdown of the loan.

Very truly yours,

KROVIM, LLC
By: Nesher, LLC

By:  /s/ Dov Perlysky
         Dov Perlysky
         Managing Member
#### RICHLAND RUN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CHC DURHAM CORPORATION, f/k/a TIMCO, INC., f/k/a DURHAM CORPORATION, f/k/a RICHLAND PROPERTIES INC. and CAPITAL HOLDING CORPORATION

No. 391A96

(Filed 9 May 1997)

Appeal by plaintiff pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 123 N.C. App. 345, 473 S.E.2d 649 (1996), affirming an order allowing defendants’ motion to dismiss entered by Hight, J., on 9 September 1994, in Superior Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court 17 April 1997.

*Wyrick, Robbins, Yates & Ponton L.L.P, by Samuel T. Wyrick, III, and, Lee M. Whitman, for plaintiff-appellant.*

*Wyche & Story, L.L.P., by N. Hunter Wyche, Jr., and Philip R. Isley, for defendant-appellees.*

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion by Judge Greene, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for remand to the Superior Court, Wake County, for further proceedings not inconsistent with Judge Greene’s dissenting opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED**

**PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board ofDirectors 

Gold Kist Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-119692) on Form S-8 of Gold Kist Inc. and subsidiaries of our reportsdated December 13, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Gold Kist Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 26, 2004 and October 1, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, patrons’ and otherequity/stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the years ended June 28, 2003 and June 26, 2004, the transition quarter ended October 2, 2004 and the year ended October 1, 2005 and the relatedfinancial statement schedule, and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of October 1, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of October 1,2005, which reports appear in the October 1, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Gold Kist Inc. 

 

KPMG LLP 

 

Atlanta, Georgia 

December 13, 2005
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No

. 21

- 3160

___________ IN RE: ANDRE THOMPSON,

Petitioner

____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Related to E .D. Pa. Crim. No. 2 : 09

- cr
- 00143

- 001 )

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

December 10 , 2021 Before: CHAGARES, Chief Judge , P ORTER and FUENTES, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed : January 7, 2022 )

_________ OPINION *

_________ PER CURIAM Pro se petitioner Andre Thompson seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the District Court to rule on a motion he filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 225 5. By order entered on December 10, 2021, the District Court denied his motion and declined to issue a certificate of appealability. In light of the District Court’s action, Thompson’s

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full C ourt and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.2

mandamus petition no longer presents a live controversy. Therefore, we will dismiss it as

moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp. , 77 F.3d 690, 698

- 99 (3d Cir. 1996) (“If developments occur during the course of adjudication that eliminate a plaintiff’s personal stake in the outcome of a suit or prevent a court from b eing able to grant the requested relief, the case must be dismissed as moot.”). If Thompson wishes to seek appellate review of the District Court’s decision with respect to his § 2255 motion, he should file a notice of appeal in the District Court within the time period set forth in F ed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B )

.
Data integrity aspects of flight safety

Dan Oltrogge

COMSPOC Corporation

16 June 2022
2

Data security + data quality = data integrity

• Ensuring data integrity between and within space systems includes:

• Data creation, data interpretation, exportation, transmittal, ingestion, interpretation, normalization, 

curation, comparison, analysis/fusion, and storage.

Terminology

Analytical tools/ 

foundation

Sender

Recipient(s)

Data

Interpretation

Mapping into a 

Data Message 

Standard

Assured transmission?

Man-in-middle?

Intentional or accidental data corruption/dropouts?

Reading from a 

Data Message 

Standard

Interpretation Analytical tools/ 

foundation

Terminology Curation

Ensemble 

comparisons

Fusion

Normalization

Storage

Information
3

The basic framework for Space Traffic Coordination and Management
4

Space object information*

• Analogous to Earth Observation data catalogs (e.g., EOSDIS, ESA EO PDGS, 

COPERNICUS), “Space Data” can be thought of in terms of Data Processing Levels 

(https://science.nasa.gov/earth-science/earth-science-data/data-processing-levels-foreosdis-data-products)

• Level 0: Anything that you know a priori, or is constant, or can be measured directly. Sources of this 

information are (1) application authorities; (2) spacecraft designers; (3) spacecraft operators.

• Level 1: Provided by operator or other authoritative source, deduced from Level 0 data

• Level 2: Inferred by observation

• Level 3: Estimated or derived based upon Level 0-Level 2 info

* Work in progress by IAF STM WG 2.3
5

CA-relevant space object data and metadata: Levels and use cases

Level Use cases

SSA, risk assessment, 

conjunction 

assessment

Compliance 

assessments (e.g., 25-

yr rule)

0 Uncalibrated astrometric observational data ...

0 Dimensions & shape

0 Thrust Capabilities

0 Owner/operator

0 Manufacturer

0 Spacecraft dry mass

1 Activity status provided by the operator

1 Planned maneuver(s)

1 Attitude stabilization method(s)

2 Activity status obtained by patterns of life

2 Past orbit (state vector, ephemeris, etc.)

2 Predicted orbit (state vector, ephemeris, etc.)

2 Attitude (quaternion, rates)

2 Spacecraft wet mass

3 Orbit lifetime

3 Maneuver system status (full/partial/failed)
6

CCSDS standards relevant to Space Traffic Coordination
7

Latest developments in STC-relevant ISO/CCSDS space safety standards

As good as these 

standards are (or will 

soon be), they have 

no “check sums” or 

error correction or 

security features. 

These standards 

assume that the 

“cybersecurity 

infrastructure” just 

works.
8

Thank you ! Dan Oltrogge (dan@comspoc.com)
Biometric System A Biometric System B 

Choose 

Threat (Step 1) 

Threat: Artifact Threat: HillClimb Threat: Lamb Tem. : ... 

Choose 

Attack Potential 

(Step 2) (Step 3)

Optimize 

Attack 

Mechanisms 

Calculate the 

Vulnerability 

Extrapolate Assurance 

VAL Level 

 for all Attack 

Potentials 

(Step 4)

Score 

Evaluate for 

Optimum 

Attack 

Parameters 

Measured data 

Calculate 

the Success 

Likelihood 

for attack 

Vulnerability Assessment Methodology 

‏ ‏

‏

© Biometrics Institute 2008 
 ProSkin Artifact 

© Biometrics Institute 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

ALLERGAN, INC., 

ALLERGAN SALES, LLC, and 

VISTAKON PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

GLAND PHARMA LIMITED, 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

C.A. No. 20-4094 

PLAINTIFFS ALLERGAN, INC. AND ALLERGAN 

SALES, LLC’S LOCAL RULE 3.2 NOTIFICATION AS TO 

AFFILIATES AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

Plaintiffs Allergan, Inc. and Allergan Sales, LLC, through undersigned counsel submits 

the following L.R. 3.2 Notification of Affiliates and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 

Corporate Disclosure Statement. 

Allergan, Inc. and Allergan Sales, LLC are indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of AbbVie 

Inc., a publicly traded company. As of the date of this filing, The Vanguard Group and 

BlackRock, Inc. each own more than 5% of AbbVie Inc.’s stock. 

Dated: July 10, 2020 POLSINELLI PC 

/S/ Gary Hood 

Gary E. Hood 

Luke T. Shannon 

Colleen C. Walter 

150 N. Riverside Plaza, Suite 3000 

Chicago, IL 60606 

(312) 819-1900 

ghood@polsinelli.com 

lshannon@polsinelli.com 

cwalter@polsinelli.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Allergan, Inc. and Allergan 

Sales, LLC

Case: 1:20-cv-04094 Document #: 3 Filed: 07/10/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:58
**Exhibit
        15.2**
 
 
 **CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
        333-121231 on Form S-8 filed on December 14, 2004 of our report dated February
        4, 2005 relating to the consolidated financial statements of SuperCom Ltd.
        and
        subsidiaries appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of SuperCom Ltd.
        for
        the year ended December 31, 2004.
  
 
 **BDO
        McCabe Lo & Company**
 Certified
        Public Accountants
 
 June
        30,
        2005
Exhibit 3.1.1

STATE OF DELAWARE CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

GFI
Group Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, does hereby certify:

FIRST:That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of GFI Group Inc. resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed
amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said amendment to be advisable and authorizing the calling of a meeting of stockholders for their
consideration and vote on said amendment. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:



The
first sentence of Article Fourth shall be amended and shall read as follows:

ARTICLE FOURTH



SECOND:That thereafter, pursuant to resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors, a special meeting of the stockholders of said
corporation was duly called and held upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of shares as
required by statute and by the Company's Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation were voted in favor of the amendment.

THIRD:That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation has caused this certificate to be signed this 11th day of January, 2008.

| |  | GFI GROUP INC.
| |  | --------------
| |  | By            
| |  | Title:        
| |  | Name:         

---



QuickLinks
##### 



Exhibit 31 I, Jerome B. Van Orman, Jr., certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing
distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by
this annual report, of Superior Wholesale Inventory Financing Trust IX;2.
    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to
the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for
inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;4.
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review
required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and5.
    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicers compliance with
the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided by an independent public
accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing,
or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports. Date: March 31, 2005 /s/ Jerome B. Van Orman, Jr. Jerome B. Van Orman, Jr.
Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer
of GMAC North American Operations
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Xenonics Holdings, Inc (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the best ofher knowledge:     (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended September30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Dated: January 13, 2006 /s/ Donna G. Lee     Donna G. Lee    Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3976 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3976

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the depreciation 
 adjustments required in computing alternative minimum taxable income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2004

 Mr. English introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the depreciation 
 adjustments required in computing alternative minimum taxable income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF DEPRECIATION ADJUSTMENTS IN COMPUTING ALTERNATIVE 
              MINIMUM TAXABLE INCOME.

    (a) Adjustments Applicable to All Taxpayers.--Subsection (a) of 
section 56 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 
adjustments applicable to all taxpayers) is amended by striking 
paragraph (1).
    (b) Item of Tax Preference.--Subsection (a) of section 57 of such 
Code (relating to general rule for items of tax preference) is amended 
by repealing paragraph (6).
    (c) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 55(e)(2)(A) of such Code is amended by striking 
        ``56(a)(1) (relating to depreciation) and section''.
            (2) Section 1400I(f) of such Code is amended by striking 
        paragraph (4).
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service after December 31, 2004.
                                 <all>
```