alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The Honorable Michael B. Thornton, United States Tax Court Judge. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-1682

___________ Mohammad J. Hashemi; * Nahid Hashemi, * * Appellants, * Appeal from the United States * Tax Court. v. * * [UNPUBLISHED] Commissioner of Internal Revenue, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: February 6, 2004 Filed: March 18, 2004

___________ Before BYE, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Mohammad and Nahid Hashemi appeal the tax court’s 1 order granting the motion of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Commissioner) for the entry of a decision. The Hashemis admit they have no quarrel with the tax years underlying the Commissioner’s motion, and we agree with the tax court that it lacked jurisdiction over the Hashemis’ challenges involving other tax years. See 26 U.S.C. § 6214(a), (b) (tax court lacks jurisdiction to determine overpayment or underpayment for years for which notice of deficiency has not been sent to taxpayer); Spector v. Comm’r , 790-2- F.2d 51, 52 (8th Cir.) (per curiam) (tax court is court of limited jurisdiction), cert. denied , 479 U.S. 884 (1986). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In
connection with this Annual Report of Ship Finance International Limited
(the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or about the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Lars Solbakken, Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.
 
 Date:
March       , 2008
 
 
 
 /s/ Lars
Solbakken_________
 Lars
Solbakken
 Principal
Executive Officer
 
 
 
 
 SK 23153 0001
862108
10332.

#### Corbin *v.*McCrary.

Decided June 9, 1919.

Eviction; from Taylor superior court—Judge Kent presiding. June 13, 1919.

*C. W.*Foy, for plaintiff in error. *Jule*Felton, contra.

On making the judgment of this court the judgment of the lower court in this case, that court erred in rendering another judgment for a ' sum of money additional to the amount of the original judgment.

Broyles, P. J.

The plaintiff brought a dispossessory warrant against the defendant for failure to pay rent and for holding beyond his term of rental. The defendant filed his counter-affidavit and gave the bond required by the statute. The verdict was in favor of 'the plaintiff for the premises in dispute and $310 as *781double rent for the time the defendant held over, to the time of the trial. The case came to this court, and the judgment of the lower court overruling the motion for a new trial was unconditionally affirmed. *Corbin*v. McCrary, 22 *Ga. App.*472 (96 S. E. 445). Upon making the judgment of tin's court the judgment of the lower court, the latter court rendered another judgment against the defendant and his sureties on the original eventual condemnation-money bond, for the sum of $542.47, double rent of the premises since the rendition of the verdict and the original judgment in the ease. The court clearly had no authority to render this judgment, and it is accordingly

*Reversed.*

*Bloodworth and*Stephens, JJ., *concur.*
SAFETY PRESSURE
RELIEF

COMPOUND PRESSURE GAUGE

SAMPLE POSITIONER ASSY
W/ (1) 10 PIN ELECTRICAL FEEDTHROUGH
& (3) BLANK PORTS.

(@)

REFRIGERATOR|
‘SRDK-305D

‘SHOWN OUT
OF POSITION )

7.09 0.

114.25 0.0.

11.0 0.0. AL

MULTILAYER:
‘SUPER INSULATION

‘THERMOCOUPLE CLAMP —~]

120 0.0. AL —}

19 PIN ELECTRICAL
FEEDTHROUGH

a 41/16 THERMOCOUPLE PORT

S—WAY EXCHANGE
GAS VALVE

8 PIN ELECTRICAL
FEEDTHROUGH

1/16 THERMOCOUPLE PORT

EVACUATION VALVE
‘WITH NW-25 FLANGE

8 PIN ELECTRICAL
FEEDTHROUGH

SAMPLE POSITIONER ASSY
W/ (1) 10 PIN ELECTRICAL FEEDTHROUGH

(1) THERMOCOUPLE PORT &
(2) BLANK PORTS.

25

RADIATION
BAFFLES:

NEUTRON ZONE SCALE
—t.040

(2) 50 OHM HEATER & SD SeNSOR—_|

COPPER TO AL TRANSITION [[-[>-—

1.5 DIA. SAMPLE MOUNT W/ 50 OHM HEATER,
PROVISION FOR SENSOR &
5/1618 THREADED STUD X 0.38 LG

6.0 OD x .O31W (AL).
6.9 NEUTRON ZONE————| | ]7-

7.0 0D X .O35W (AL).

ap
53.39
re
|— 8.94 00. x .22W (AL)
I vewounraste
INDUM SEAL
2.5 00. x .088W
(OFHC COPPER)
33.50
_— | \ THERMOCOUPLE
Le CLAMP \
4 |
475
TI
Paes | so (4) 4-40 TAPPED HoLES|
tf | EQ SP ON PERIPHERY.

250 mm SQUARE
BOTTOM FLANGE

SYSTEM INCLUDES—

(6) SAMPLE POSTIONER ASSY’S FOR 500K &
(6) SAMPLE POSTIONERS ASSY’S FOR 800K

4X CLEAR HOLES FOR
#M6 SCREWS ON 9.05
SQ. CORNER

NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS. ARE IN INCHES

CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY [BEET Se-L oes!

VANIS RESEARCH CO.
WLMINGTON, MA.

‘ME SPECIAL SHI-950-4
NON-OPTICAL HIGH TEMP.

SEE] a ‘a

‘DO’—08-05B| ‘A

[eacs/ie [en Terr
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The certification set forth below is being submittedin connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mueller WaterProducts, LLC (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “ExchangeAct”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode.

I, Jeffery W.Sprick, the Chief Financial Officer of Mueller Water Products, LLC,certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.                the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theExchange Act; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Mueller Water Products, LLC.

| Date: December 19, 2005 | By:    | /s/ JEFFERY W.  SPRICK    |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                         |   | Jeffery W. Sprick         |
|                         |   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATE OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CRT Properties, Inc.:  2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;  b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and  b.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Dated: August 4, 2004
    /s/ Thomas J. CrockerThomas J. CrockerChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
CRT Properties, Inc.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6367

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GEORGE MILTON DEMORY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District

Judge. (CR-90-92, CA-03-52-7)

Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 27, 2003

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Milton Demory, Appellant Pro Se. John Leslie Brownlee,

United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

George M. Demory, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28

U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final

order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). When, as here, the lower court dismisses a § 2255 motion

solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will

not issue unless the movant can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists

of reason would find it debatable whether the [motion] states a

valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that

jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district

court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000)), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Demory has not satisfied this

standard. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
| **Exhibit 32.2** |
|------------------|

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 
| August 11, 2005

(Date) |   | By /s/    Harry N. Stout 

Harry N. Stout

President |
|-------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00466-CR

Lester Ray Guy, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-10-302548, HONORABLE DAVID CRAIN, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

The State’s brief was originally due November 14, 2013, and the State has been

granted three extensions. The State has filed a fourth motion, seeking an additional thirty days to

file the brief, for a total of 120 days. We grant the motion, extending the deadline to March 17,

2014, and caution counsel that no further extensions will be granted.

It is ordered February 21, 2014.

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Field

Do Not Publish
December 13, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

WINSTON LEON HENDRICKS, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00673-CV V.

SHARON KAYE (BERWICK) BARKER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE 

INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES LUTHER 

BERWICK, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the “Order of Dismissal” signed August 7, 2015, 

was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no 

error in the trial court’s ruling. We order the ruling of the court below 

AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, Winston Leon Hendricks, to pay all costs incurred in 

this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04699

Honorable John Z. Lee

TikTok Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, December 7, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:The Court has reviewed the

status report. As requested by the parties, the status hearing set for 12/11/20 is reset to

1/14/21 at 2:00 p.m. via Microsoft Teams. The dial in number remains the same.Mailed

notice(ca, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 113 Filed: 12/07/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1872
NVLAP ASSESSOR BULLETIN AB-17-2012 PAGE 1 OF 1

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology

National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

ISSUE DATE:

August 20, 2012

ASSESSOR BULLETIN

NUMBER: AB-17-2012

LAP: Testing LAPs

that use Test Method 

Review Summary

Revision of NVLAP Test Method Review Summary

This Assessor Bulletin supersedes and replaces AB-8-2008.

The purpose of this bulletin is to announce the release of a new version of the NVLAP Test 

Method Review Summary. Effectively immediately, the August 2012 version of this form is the 

official, controlled version. Please download the revised form from the NVLAP On-Site 

Assessment Forms webpage (http://www.nist.gov/nvlap/on-site-assessment-forms.cfm) by 

selecting “Test Method Review Summary.” The form is available in both PDF and Microsoft 

Excel formats. All previous versions, electronic and paper, of this form must be destroyed.

The Test Method Review Summary has long been a tool used by NVLAP assessors to capture 

information about the test methods assessed at a laboratory and the extent of the assessment. It is 

an important means of demonstrating NVLAP’s compliance with the sampling requirements of 

ISO/IEC 17011:2004. The form is used in combination with a program-specific checklist in most 

NVLAP testing LAPs, particularly when a requested scope of accreditation contains numerous 

test methods for the same test technology. For each test method, the assessor records the depth 

of the assessment and other pertinent information. The consistent documentation of the depth of 

an assessment is necessary for reviewers of an on-site report to know the level of the assessment 

and for future assessors to target areas that were not previously evaluated.

The instructions have been revised to advise assessors to select test methods that were not 

assessed in-depth during the previous on-site assessment (absent any program-specific 

requirements). In addition, the choices for the depth of the assessment for each test method have 

been presented in a hierarchical order so that one choice will be sufficiently descriptive.

You are reminded to submit completed on-site assessment reports via e-mail to 

NVLAP@nist.gov with a cc: to the appropriate Program Manager. All forms must be clearly 

identified with the date and NVLAP Lab Code on each page.

Please direct any questions about this bulletin to your NVLAP Program Manager.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                         EARNINGS PER SHARE COMPUTATIONS
                      (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                            THREE MONTH PERIOD
                                                                                              ENDED  MARCH 31,
                                                                                        ---------------------------
                                                                                          2000              1999
                                                                                        ---------         ---------
<S>                                                                                     <C>               <C>
EARNINGS PER COMMON AND DILUTIVE
  POTENTIAL COMMON SHARE:
  Net Income                                                                            $   5,355         $   8,750
                                                                                        =========         =========

  Shares:
  Weighted average number of common
      shares outstanding - Basic                                                           26,796            26,582
  Effect of dilutive securities (a):
      Stock options                                                                           299               302
                                                                                        ---------         ---------
  Adjusted common shares - Diluted                                                         27,095            26,884
                                                                                        =========         =========


EARNINGS PER SHARE - DILUTED                                                            $    0.20         $    0.33
                                                                                        =========         =========
</TABLE>

(a) Shares issuable were derived using the "Treasury Stock Method" for all
    dilutive potential shares.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         112,263
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,037
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,794
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               154,611
<PP&E>                                          99,504
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,419
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 222,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,849
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           203
<OTHER-SE>                                     161,321
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   222,224
<SALES>                                        222,896
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               222,896
<CGS>                                          197,760
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  197,760
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 189
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,213
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,695
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,518
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,518
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.79



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3942 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3942

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 7 Commercial Boulevard in Middletown, Rhode Island, as the ``Rhode 
                Island Veterans Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2004

 Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island (for himself and Mr. Langevin) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 7 Commercial Boulevard in Middletown, Rhode Island, as the ``Rhode 
                Island Veterans Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RHODE ISLAND VETERANS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Redesignation.--The facility of the United States Postal 
Service located at 7 Commercial Boulevard in Middletown, Rhode Island, 
is hereby redesignated as the ``Rhode Island Veterans Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Rhode Island 
Veterans Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```