alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

House Calendar No. 238

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 507

[Report No. 105–658]

Providing special investigative authority for the Committee on Education

and the Workforce.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 21, 1998

Mr. GOODLING (for himself, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. HILLEARY,

Mr. BALLENGER, Mr. BOB SCHAFFER of Colorado, and Mr. PARKER)

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on Rules

JULY 29, 1998

Reported with an amendment, referred to the House Calendar, and ordered

to be printed

[Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic]

RESOLUTION

Providing special investigative authority for the Committee

on Education and the Workforce.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. APPLICATION.

3 This resolution shall apply to the investigation by the

4 Committee on Education and the Workforce into the ad-
2

•HRES 507 RH

1 ministration of labor laws by Government agencies, includ2 ing the Departments of Labor and Justice, concerning the

3 International Brotherhood of the Teamsters, and other re4 lated matters.

5 SEC. 2. HANDLING OF INFORMATION.

6 Information obtained under the authority of this res7 olution shall be—

8 (1) considered as taken in the District of Co9 lumbia as well as at the location actually taken; and

10 (2) considered as taken in executive session by

11 the subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of

12 the Committee on Education and the Workforce.

13 SEC. 3. DISPOSITION AND INTERROGATORIES.

14 The Chairman of the Committee on Education and

15 the Workforce, after consultation with the ranking minor16 ity member of the committee, may—

17 (1) order the taking of depositions or interrog18 atories anywhere within the United States, under

19 oath and pursuant to notice or subpoena; and

20 (2) designate a member, staff, or contractor or

21 staff of the committee to conduct any such proceed22 ing.

House Calendar No. 238

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 507

[Report No. 105–658]

RESOLUTION

Providing special investigative authority for the

Committee on Education and the Workforce.

JULY 29, 1998

Reported with an amendment, referred to the House

Calendar, and ordered to be printed
#### Laurence WOODS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nadine PURINGTON; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 04-35329.

D.C. No. CV-02-01385-AJB.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 6, 2004.*

Decided Dec. 21, 2004.

Laurence Woods, Portland, OR, pro se.

Gerald H. Itkin, Office of Multnomah County Counsel, Portland, OR, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*617MEMORANDUM**

Laurence Woods, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that staff at the Multnomah County Sheriffs Office violated his constitutional rights by refusing to make copies of his legal papers, denying him legal forms, and by filing a false disciplinary report against him. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review summary judgment de novo, *Barnett v. Centoni,*31 F.3d 813, 815 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Woods’ access to courts claim alleging that he was deprived of legal forms to file a wrongful death action on behalf of his brother, because the lawsuit did not relate to Woods’ sentence or the conditions of his confinement. *See Lewis v. Casey,*518 U.S. 343, 355, 116 S.Ct. 2174, 135 L.Ed.2d 606 (1996).

The district court properly determined that Woods failed to raise a triable issue concerning whether he was actually injured as a result of the allegedly inadequate law library. *See id.*at 350-51, 355.

Woods’ remaining contentions lack merit.

Woods’ motion for an extension of time to file an optional reply brief is granted. The Clerk shall file the reply brief received on October 22, 2004.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.6.3

Eastern Division

Mish International Monetary Inc.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04577

Honorable Manish S. Shah

Vega Capital London, Ltd., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, January 27, 2023:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Defendants' motion to

bifurcate class certification and merits discovery [198] is denied, with the caveat that

class−certification discovery will necessarily be prioritized to comply with this scheduling

order. The parties may issue written discovery on 1/31/23. All fact discovery, including

any foreign discovery, must be noticed in time for completion by 12/30/24. Plaintiff's

motion for class certification, including any supporting expert reports, is due 1/22/24.

Defendants' (joint) opposition to class certification, including any supporting expert

reports, is due 3/4/24. Plaintiff's reply along with rebuttal expert reports is due 4/8/24. The

court expects the parties to confer on a class−certification expert discovery and deposition

protocol. If the parties cannot agree, the court will impose a protocol by 10/30/23. The

court will set deadlines for amendment of the pleadings, merits expert discovery, and

dispositive motions when the parties get closer to completing fact discovery. An agreed

proposed confidentiality order may be submitted to

proposed_order_shah@ilnd.uscourts.gov. The parties shall file a joint status report

describing discovery accomplished, any disputes needing court intervention, and the

witnesses to be deposed (and on what timetable) on 7/12/23. The parties may contact the

courtroom deputy to schedule a status conference with the court and to request court

assistance on any discovery issues. Notices mailed. (psm, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04577 Document #: 201 Filed: 01/27/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2877
#### A. F. Butner et al. *v.*R. D. Cook.

Life Estates — Rents and Improvements.

A tenant for life has no right to compensation for improvements made upon land in which he has only a life estate, and no recovery can be had by the tenant during his occupancy of the land or by his heirs or representatives after his death.

APPEAL FROM ROCKCASTLE CIRCUIT COURT.

October 28, 1871.

*Williams, Butner, Disham, for appellants.*

*Kertley, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

The judgment rendered by the court below in favor of the appellee Cook upon his cross-petition is erroneous. The wife of Cook had a life estate in this land under the will of her father, and herself and husband under the will had occupied the land for several years. The use of the land -more than compensated them for the improvements made. The question of rents and improvements, 'however, can not be considered in a case like this. The tenant for -life has no right to compensation for improvements made upon the land in which he has a life estate only. No recovery can be had by the tenant during his occupancy of the land nor by his heirs or representatives after his death. The judgment of the court below upon Cook’s cross-petition is reversed, and the court directed to dismiss the same so far as it seeks to recover for improvements made upon the land of the wife.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.2

Eastern Division

Anthony Mays, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02134

Honorable Robert W. Gettleman

Dart J Thomas

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, April 14, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Telephonic status

hearing held on 4/14/2020. Plaintiffs are to file their motion for expedited discovery and

preliminary injunction by 8:00 p.m. on 4/14/2020. Telephonic status hearing and hearing

on motion for expedited discovery before Judge Kennelly set for 4/15/2020 at 3:15 p.m.

Defendant has leave to file a written response to plaintiffs' motion for expedited prior to

the hearing on 4/15/2020 but none is required. The parties are to use the same call in

information that was used on 4/14/2020. For members of the media or public who wish to

listen to the hearing, it will be simultaneously played via loudspeaker in Courtroom 2541

at the Dirksen Courthouse, where Judge Kennelly will be sitting. Mailed notice (cn).

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02134 Document #: 53 Filed: 04/14/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1445
9819.

#### Stewart *v.*The State.

Decided January 9, 1919.

Stephens, J.

1. Where a defendant is indicted for the larceny of an ' automobile, the charge in detail being that he did take and carry away with intent to steal, etc., “one seven-passenger automobile Overland” of a certain designated number and model, and the evidence shows that ' the automobile was a “seven-passenger Wyllis-Overland” of the same number and mod'el as alleged in the indictment, the description in the evidence conforming in every detail with that contained in the indictment, except that the indictment alleges “Overland” when the proof shows the automobile to have been a “Wyllis-Overland,” there is no such variance between the charge and the proof as would amount to a failure of the evidence to sustain the charge set out in the indictment. In the absence of proof that an “Overland” and a “Wyllis-Overland” are separate and distinct types of automobiles; the word “Overland” will be taken as generic and generally descriptive of a certain type of automobile, and the word “Wyllis”'will be taken as an adjective describing specifically a particular species of automobile. It follows, therefore, that where an indictment alleges generally that the. automobile stolen was an “Overland” of a certain number and model, this allegation is sustained by evidence to the effect that the automobile claimed 'to have been stolen was a particular kind of Overland, such as a “Wyllis-Overland.” '

2. The failure on the part of the trial judge' to define simple larceny, or larceny, in his charge to the jury is not' error, in the absence of a timely written request so to do, when the charge as a whole correctly and properly states the law applicable to the case..

3. The evidence, while circumstantial, was sufficient to authorize the- jury to find the defendant guilty, and the jury having so found, and their ■ verdict having been approved by the trial judge, this court will not • disturb their' finding.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., concurs diibitante.*

*140Indictment for larceny; from Laurens superior court—Judge Kent. May 10, 1918.

*W. A. Dampier,*for plaintiff in error.

*E. L. Stephens, solicitor-general,*contra.
Exhibit
32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of NB Capital Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Jean Dagenais, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Jean DagenaisJean Dagenais 
Chief Financial Officer 
Date:  November 9, 2004

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or any other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

---
Conformed Copy
                                                                    Exhibit 3

                             CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                      OF
                          PREMIER AUTO TRUST 1997-2


               THIS Certificate of Trust of Premier Auto Trust 1997-2 (the
"Trust"), dated August 4, 1997, is being duly executed and filed by Chase
Manhattan Bank Delaware, a Delaware banking corporation, as trustee, to form
a business trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del.C. ss. 3801 et
seq.).


               1. Name: The name of the business trust formed hereby is
Premier Auto Trust 1997-2.


               2. Delaware Trustee: The name and business address of the
trustee of the Trust in the State of Delaware is Chase Manhattan Bank
Delaware, 1201 Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, Attention:
Corporate Trustee Administration Department.


               3. Effective Date: This Certificate of Trust shall be
effective upon its filing with the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware.


               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the sole trustee of
the Trust, has executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first-above
written.


                                            CHASE MANHATTAN BANK DELAWARE,
                                            not in its individual capacity
                                            but solely as Owner Trustee under
                                            the Trust Agreement dated as of
                                            August 4, 1997


                                            By:    /s/ J. J. Cashin
                                                   --------------------
                                            Name:  JOHN J. CASHIN
                                            Title: SENIOR TRUST OFFICER
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 437 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 437

   Commending Jack Elrod for his contributions to the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 1998

   Mr. Linder (for himself, Mr. Chambliss, and Mr. Deal of Georgia) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                              on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Commending Jack Elrod for his contributions to the United States.

Whereas Jack Elrod served as a weather forecaster in the United States Navy 
        during World War II;
Whereas Jack Elrod authors and illustrates the Mark Trail comic strip and has 
        been associated with the strip since 1950;
Whereas the Mark Trail comic strip regularly appears in more than 175 
        newspapers;
Whereas Jack Elrod has been dedicated to nature and the environment throughout 
        his public and private life, and his cartoon character, Mark Trail, has 
        exhibited that same dedication throughout the existence of the comic 
        strip;
Whereas Jack Elrod, through the Mark Trail comic strip, shares with his readers 
        his love of nature and the environment and educates them with regard to 
        environmental and safety issues;
Whereas Jack Elrod has made invaluable contributions to the National Oceanic and 
        Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to promote safety and quality of life;
Whereas Jack Elrod, through the Mark Trail comic strip, has promoted the use of 
        NOAA weather radio as a means of monitoring dangerous weather 
        conditions; and
Whereas Jack Elrod is an exemplary husband, father, and grandfather, and 
        continues to demonstrate his commitment to safety and the environment: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates Jack Elrod for the ongoing success of the 
        Mark Trail comic strip;
            (2) commends Jack Elrod for his longstanding dedication to 
        safety and the environment, as expressed throughout his public 
        and private life and through his Mark Trail comic strip; and
            (3) expresses gratitude to Jack Elrod for the valuable and 
        exemplary contributions he has made to the Nation.
                                 <all>
```
HAVA | HAVA BREACH | H.A.V.A. | EAC | E.A.C. | T.G.D.C. | TGDC | Electio...ction Fraud | Poll Fraud | Election News | Voter News | Election Results

Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA)

 

IT IS SHAMEFUL THAT OUR COUNTRY WHICH PROMOTES WORLDWIDE 

DEMOCRACY PERMITS 20,000,000 VOTERS (by mail) TO BREACH THE FEDERAL 

HAVA LAW.

HAVA MANDATES NOW 

301(c)(2) PROTECTION OF PAPER BALLOT VOTING SYSTEMS 

For purposes of subsection (a)(1)(A)(i), the term “verify” may not be defined in a manner that 

makes it impossible for paper ballot voting systems to meet the requirements of such sub-section 

or to be modified to meet such requirements. (click here to see how this is possible)

301(d) EFFECTIVE DATE 

Each State and jurisdiction shall be required to comply with the requirements of this section on and 

after January 1, 2006.

301(a)(1)(A)(i) permit the voter to verify (in a private and independent manner) the votes selected 

by the voter on the ballot before the ballot is cast and counted.

On December 13, 2005, the Election Assistance Commission defined privacy as the ability to 

prevent others from determining how an individual voted.

3.1.7 Privacy

The voting process shall preclude anyone else from determining the content of a voter's ballot, 

without the voter's cooperation. Privacy ensures that the voter can make selections based solely on 

his her own preferences without intimidation or inhibition. Among other practices, this forbids the 

issuance of a receipt to the voter that would provide proof on how he or she voted.

Click here to read u.s. Federal Judge Gerald Bruce Lee's Opinion.

Contact Fernando Morales: info@havabreach.com

http://www.havabreach.com/12/13/2006 8:21:16 AM
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 601 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 15, 1998.
    Resolved, That the bill of the Senate (S. 361) entitled the ``Rhinoceros and 
Tiger Conservation Act of 1998'', in the opinion of this House, contravenes the 
first clause of the seventh section of the first article of the Constitution of 
the United States and is an infringement of the privileges of this House and 
that such bill be respectfully returned to the Senate with a message 
communicating this resolution.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | July 1, 2011 |   | By:    | /s/ Brenton W. Hatch          |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   |         |   |   | Brenton W. Hatch              |   |
|   |         |   |   | Chief Executive Officer       |   |
|   |         |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |   |
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of SmartPros Ltd. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stanley
P. Wirtheim, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A
signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.

|                         | 
|------------------------ | 
|/s/ Stanley
 P. Wirtheim | 
|                         | 
|Stanley P.
 Wirtheim     | 
|Chief
 Financial Officer | 
|                         | 
|March 23,
 2009          | 

---