alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Impact of Documentary and Measurement Standards 

and Standardization on Product Development

Chittaranjan Sahay 

sahay@hartford.edu

Suhash Ghosh 

ghosh@hartford.edu
Courses Served

• Design 

– ME 370 – Elements of Machine Design

Fatigue, Creep, Fracture Test Standards

– ME 470 – Machine Design

AGMA, ABMA, API, ASME AND ISO-Limits and Fits

• Manufacturing

– ME 480: Modern Manufacturing Processes 

Limits and Fits, GD&T ASME Y 14.5, Surface Roughness ASME B46.1

• Materials

– ME 213 – Mechanical Engineering and Materials Lab

ASTM for Tension, Torsion, Hardness (Rockwell) and Impact testing 

(IZOD & Charpy)

• Culminating Experience

- ME 472/ME 473 – Senior Capstone Design Project, As needed, example 

ASME boiler codes, ASME thick plate design with holes in nuclear reactor 
Courses Served

• Metrology

– ME 512 – Precision Engineering

ASME B 89

– ME 513 - Advanced Geometrical Dimensioning and Tolerancing

ASME Y 14.5 2009 and ISO 1101 2017 standards

– ME 514: Principles of Dimensional Metrology 

ISO 286, ASME B 89

– ME 515: Gage Quantification 

AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group) MSA Study (Measurement 

System Analysis)

– ME 516: Metrology Project – Culminating Experience
Association with ASME

• Both Drs Sahay and Ghosh worked on ASME Education 

Committee for “Infusion of Codes and Standards in 

Undergraduate ME Curriculum” Design track since 2017, 2 

modules on GD&T are being pilot tested at several different 

schools. Outreach to more schools is currently in progress. 
Association with Industries

• Development of Center for Manufacturing and Metrology

 30 Pratt & Whitney cohorts trained in “Fundamentals of Metrology”, 

since October 2016, more than 350 supplier Quality, Design and 

Manufacturing engineers, 12 cohorts planned for 2020.

 First cohort of 12 engineers from Collins Aerospace will be trained 

December 2 – 6, 2019

 Pratt & Whitney training on “Fundamentals of Airfoils” for 50 quality 

engineers completed, more sessions planned for 2020.

 Industry Advisory Group for the Center consists of Nikon Metrology, 

Zygo (Ametek Group), Taylor Hobson (Ametek Group), Mahr

Metrology, Faro, CCAT, NIST, Pratt & Whitney, Sensofar, LS Starrett, 

and Hexagon Metrology.
Exhibit 99.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of CompX  International  Inc.  (the
Company)  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  March 31,  2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Darryl R.
Halbert, Vice President,  Chief Financial Officer and Controller of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/  Darryl R. Halbert
---------------------------------------
Darryl R. Halbert
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
 and Controller



May 8, 2003



*    A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
     been  provided to CompX  International  Inc.  and will be retained by CompX
     International Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
     or its staff upon request.
| Exhibit 99.4 **J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., Commercial Mortgage****Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-C2****Aggregate Statement of Principal and Interest Distributions to Certificateholders****for January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004****Ending Principal****Class****CUSIP****Principal****Interest****Balance**LR-RP 0.00 0.00 0.00 LR 9ABSQ6040 0.00 0.00 0.00 A-1 46625M3L1 3,275,858.85 2,261,455.82 88,724,141.15 A-1A 46625M3V9 1,240,712.86 8,580,221.24 273,206,287.14 A-2 46625M3M9 0.00 3,026,134.07 100,000,000.00 A-3 46625M3N7 0.00 13,368,933.04 431,388,000.00 B 46625M3P2 0.00 769,950.85 24,581,000.00 C 46625M3Q0 0.00 324,193.12 10,350,000.00 D 46625M3R8 0.00 769,919.52 24,580,000.00 E 46625M3S6 0.00 283,661.16 9,056,000.00 F 46625M3X5 0.00 364,725.09 11,644,000.00 G 46625M3Z0 0.00 243,129.18 7,762,000.00 H 46625M4B2 0.00 364,693.80 11,643,000.00 J 46625M4D8 0.00 202,628.53 6,469,000.00 K 46625M4F3 0.00 162,096.58 5,175,000.00 L 46625M4H9 0.00 81,032.63 2,587,000.00 M 46625M4K2 0.00 121,564.61 3,881,000.00 N 46625M4M8 0.00 81,063.95 2,588,000.00 NR 46625M4R7 0.00 445,769.66 14,231,381.00 P 46625M4P1 0.00 81,032.63 2,587,000.00 R 9ABSQ6051 0.00 0.00 0.00 RP-1 46625M4T3 0.00 169,527.22 5,800,000.00 RP-2 46625M4V8 0.00 133,536.00 4,500,000.00 RP-3 46625M4X4 0.00 145,190.09 4,750,000.00 RP-4 46625M4Z9 0.00 161,151.51 5,150,000.00 RP-5 46625M5B1 0.00 262,335.48 7,800,000.00 X 46625M3T4 0.00 826,807.56 1,030,452,809.29 NR 0.00 0.00 0.00 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 99.3





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of DDi Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Joseph P. Gisch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Date: August 14, 2002

By:

/s/    JOSEPH P. GISCHJoseph P. Gisch Chief
Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0330

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

BRADLEY MEFFORD,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until September 30, 2020 to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

August 25 2020

08/25/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0330
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 25, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 25, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20D0104. MONICA BARRONTON v. MARK BUTLER, COMMISSIONER OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2019CV02744
##### 



Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the registrant.
  
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC and will be retained by Macquarie Infrastructure Company
LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

XYZ Corporation

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.:

1:20−cv−04077

Honorable Robert M.

Dow Jr.

The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations

Identified on Schedule "A"

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, September 16, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Telephone conference

held on 9/16/2020. Defendants failed to appear. Motion by Plaintiff for default judgment

as to all remaining Defendants [38] is granted. Signed Order to follow. Civil case

terminated. Mailed notice(cdh, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04077 Document #: 42 Filed: 09/16/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:636
----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----

Dear NIST 

Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback onf the draft 

principles for X 

I paste below and attach as text some comments, which I would be 

grateful if they could be 

taken into account and possibly addressed. Looking forward to the 

standard for explainability 

Best regards 

Paola Di Maio, PhD 

FEEDBACK FOR NIST ON EXPLAINABILITY 

Draft NIST IR 8312 

from PAOLA DI MAIO, Expert and Co-chair W3C AI KR CG 

13 October 2020 

PREAMBLES 

a) before explainability can be addressed in the context of AI, AI 

should be better understood/defined. The reality is that we may not 

yet have AI after all 

b) In addition to the distinction between narrow and general AI, the 

distinction between closed vs open system AI is also necessary. This 

particularly applies to the point of Knowledge limits in the draft. 

GENERAL COMMENTS ON THE PRINCIPLES IN THE DRAFT 

1. EXPLANATION type mismatch among the principles 

for example explanation, is a noun, while meaningful is an adjective, 

would be advisable to have some consistency in the naming conventions? 

2. MEANINGFUL explanation is described as a principle that mandates an 

explanation for AI, and meaningful is described as a principle that 

the explanation is meaningful, but it does not describe criteria/ 

parameters for meaningfulness. This does not seem up to standard. 

Looks to me that meaningful is a qualifier for explanation (1) 

3. EXPLANATION ACCURACY - same as above, this does not seem a 

principle more like a qualifier for principle 1. Looks to me that 2 

and 3 are qualifiers for 1. however they should be better defined 

4. KNOWLEDGE LIMITS - this is new (ie. unheard of) Is there a 

reference for such a notion? Where does it come from? who may have 

come up with such an idea? 

Intelligence can be said to overcome knowledge limits, ie, given 

limited knowledge an intelligent process relies on logical inferences 

deduction, abduction to achieve a conclusion. Reasoning with limited 

knowledge is a defining characteristic of intelligent systems. 

Furthermore in open systems, knowledge is not limited, by contrast, it 

is continually updated with new knowledge. To consider limited 

knowledge for intelligent systems/AI is a contradiction in terms. A 

knowledge limit applies to closed database systems not to AI. 
-----------------------

OTHER points 

======= 

- In addition to meaningful and accurate, explanations should also be 

timely, accessible, updatable etc 

- (symbolic) Knowledge Representation (KR) is a mechanism for 

explainability should be emphasized 

- this work possibly leads to a standard for explainability? would be 

needed, please keep me up to date 

Best regards
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, 

INC.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND 

UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS 

IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A,”

 Defendants.

Case No. 20-cv-04423

Judge Charles R. Norgle

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL UNDER RULE 41(a)(1)

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Volkswagen 

Group of America, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) hereby dismisses this action without prejudice as to the 

following Defendants:

Defendant Name Line No.

CHANONE US 60

Chunling Accessories 62

JYMY Auto parts 71

Case: 1:20-cv-04423 Document #: 30 Filed: 09/14/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:4205
2

Dated this 14th day of September 2020. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Allyson M. Martin

Amy C. Ziegler

Justin R. Gaudio

Allyson M. Martin

Thomas J. Juettner

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500

Chicago, Illinois 60606

312.360.0080 / 312.360.9315 (facsimile)

aziegler@gbc.law

jgaudio@gbc.law

amartin@gbc.law

tjjuettner@gbc.law

Counsel for Plaintiff Volkswagen Group of America, 

Inc.

Case: 1:20-cv-04423 Document #: 30 Filed: 09/14/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:4206
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 2000, AND THE RELATED
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND
THE NOTES THERETO, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY RERERENCE TO SUCH
CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         166,465
<SECURITIES>                                    36,195
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,502
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         51
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               204,984
<PP&E>                                          10,535
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,674
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 216,623
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,218
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                     190,720
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   216,623
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,406
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,612)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        75
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,687)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,997)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.32)


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"X-66 3D File","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Ny712zKj0B\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/x-66-3d-file\/\">X-66 3D File<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/x-66-3d-file\/embed\/#?secret=Ny712zKj0B\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“X-66 3D File” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Ny712zKj0B\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/x-66-3d-model-v5.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":480}
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of GE Financial Assurance Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 28, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Fraizer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:

/s/    MICHAEL D. FRAIZERMichael D. Fraizer Chief Executive Officer





October 29, 2002
Exhibit 13.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Inmarsat Group Limited (the "Company") for the annual period ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Periodic Report"), I, Rick Medlock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  | /s/RICK MEDLOCKRick Medlock Chief Financial Officer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------

Date:
April 29, 2005

---



QuickLinks
V 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3794

For the relief of the heirs of Henry D. Espy of St. Louis, Missouri. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2004

Mr. CONYERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of the heirs of Henry D. Espy of St. Louis, 

Missouri.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COMPENSATION OF CERTAIN LOSSES FOR THE 

4 HEIRS OF HENRY D. ESPY OF ST. LOUIS, MIS5 SOURI. 

6 (a) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘heirs of 

7 Henry D. Espy’’ means Mary Espy, Mary Espy Rhodes 

8 Hoover, Frances Espy Rankin, Jeannette Espy Burton, 

9 Mark Espy, Damon Espy, Jamisette Espy, Ashley Espy, 

10 Luke Espy, Reuben Gresham, Melanie Espy, Jasmine 

11 Espy, Jake Espy, Jeanne Hoover, Robert Hoover, Harold 
2

•HR 3794 IH 

1 Logan, Andrew Logan, Minda Logan, Andrew Logan II, 

2 Gabrielle Logan, Justin Logan, and Randall Rhodes 

3 Logan. 

4 (b) PAYMENT.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall 

5 pay, using funds in the Treasury not otherwise appro6 priated, to the heirs of Henry D. Espy of St. Louis, Mis7 souri, as their interests may appear, an amount equal to 

8 the difference between—

9 (1) the fair market value of land owned by 

10 Henry D. Espy located in Gifford, Indian River 

11 County, Florida, that was taken by the United 

12 States in an eminent domain proceeding in 1942, as 

13 determined by an appraisal satisfactory to the Sec14 retary and the heirs of Henry D. Espy; and 

15 (2) sums already paid by the United States to 

16 Henry D. Espy in connection with such taking. 

17 (c) SETTLEMENT.—The payment under subsection 

18 (b) shall be in full settlement of all claims of the heirs 

19 of Henry D. Espy arising from the 1942 taking referred 

20 to in such subsection. 

21 (d) NO INFERENCE OF LIABILITY.—Nothing in this 

22 section shall be construed as an inference of liability on 

23 the part of the United States. 

24 (e) LIMITATION ON AGENTS’ AND ATTORNEYS’ 

25 FEES.—Any contract to the contrary notwithstanding, no 
3

•HR 3794 IH 

1 more than ten percent of the payment required by sub2 section (b) may be paid to or received by any agent or 

3 attorney for services rendered in connection with obtaining 

4 such payment. Any person who violates this subsection 

5 shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be subject to 

6 a fine in the amount provided in title 18, United States 

7 Code.

Æ