alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
10287.

#### Gunn *v.*The State.

Bloodworth, J.

1. “ ‘It is well settled by repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and this court that on a trial for murder, if there is anything deducible from the evidence or the defendant’s statement that would tend to show manslaughter, voluntary or involuntary, it is the duty of the court to instruct the jury fully on the law of manslaughter. *Crawford*v. *State,*12 *Ga.*142 (6) ; *Jackson*v. *State,*76 *Ga.*473; *Wayne*v. *State,*56 *Ga.*113; *Bell*v. *State,*130 *Ga.*865 [61 S. E. 996]; *Strickland*v. *State,*133 *Ga.*76 [65 S. E. 148]; *Pyle*v. *State,*4 *Ga. App.*811 [62 S. E. 540].’ *Cain*v. *State,*7 *Ga. App.*24 (65 S. E. 1069).” *Weldon*v. *State,*21 *Ga. App.*330*(h),*331 (94 S. E. 327). Applying these rulings to the facts of this case, the judge did not err in instructing the jury on voluntary manslaughter.

2. Eor the judge in his charge to tell the jury, “I deem it my duty to give you in charge in this ease the law of voluntary manslaughter,” and in another part of his charge to say, “I will first instruct you, as before stated, in the law of voluntary manslaughter in or upon a sudden heat of passion, and will later instruct you in other grades of this offense, should I deem it necessary from the evidence as .understood by the court,” does not amount to “an expression of opinion by the court that the ease was one in which a verdict for manslaughter should have been rendered;” nor was the last-quoted excerpt from the charge erroneous because “the court did nowhere in his charge submit the other grades of voluntary [ ?] manslaughter, as he had in his charge stated he would do.” See authorities cited in the following paragraph.

3. The charge of which complaint is made in ground 4 of the amendment to the motion for a new trial contains an abstractly correct principle of law; and “a charge which is abstractly correct is not rendered erroneous'by a failure to charge some other legal principle applicable to the case.” *Winn*v. *Bridges,*144 *Ga.*497 (3) (87 S. E. 665) ; *Central of Georgia Ry. Co.,*v. *Grady,*113 *Ga.*1045 (3) (39 S. E. 441; *Conley*v. *State,*21 *Ga. App.*134 (94 S. E. 261), and cases cited. *5464. The excerpts from the charge complained of in the remaining grounds . of the motion for new trial are not, when read in connection, with the entire charge, erroneous for any reason .alleged.

Decided April 12, 1919.

Conviction of manslaughter; from Worth superior court—Judge Eve. December *7,*1918.

*Perry & Williamson, J. J. Forehand, E. E. Cox,*for plaintiff in error. *R. S. Foy, solicitor-general,*contra.

5. No error of law appearing, and there being ample evidence to authorize the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, this court is powerless to interfere. • -

*Judgment, affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur..*
EXHIBIT 99.4


     Certification  of  Chief  Executive  Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350

     In  connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of American Fire Retardant
Corporation  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2002 as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  Raoul  L.  Carroll, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

   (1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section 13(a)
        or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

   (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in  all
        material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of
        operations  of  the  Company.



/s/  Raoul  L.  Carroll
---------------------------
Raoul  L.  Carroll
Chief  Executive  Officer

September  17,  2002
Amended Letter Agreement, by and between TIH Ltd. and Pierre Duhamel



 Exhibit 10.3 
 November 9, 2005 
  
 Mr. Pierre Duhamel 
 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 
  

	 	Re:	AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

  
 Dear Pierre, 
  
 I am pleased to confirm that Teleglobe International Holdings Ltd (“Teleglobe”) has approved the following
changes, effective November 1, 2005, to your employment agreement dated January 10, 2005 (“Agreement”): 
  
 1) Incentive Compensation: With respect to 2005, the target performance level shall be 140% of base salary, retroactive to January
1, 2005. 
  
 2) Termination: The target
bonus set out in clause (c) of the section regarding “Termination” shall be amended from 100% of base salary to 140% of base salary. 
  
 Except as amended above, the terms and conditions of the Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed, and shall remain in full force and effect.

  
 Please indicate your acceptance of these terms and conditions
by signing this letter and returning the original copy to Nicole Lemay, Vice President, Human Resources. 
  
 Thank you for your continued contributions and commitment to the success of Teleglobe. 
  

	
	Best regards,
	
	/s/    LIAM STRONG        
	Liam Strong
	President and Chief Executive Officer

  

	cc:	Nicole Lemay, VP, Human Resources 

  
 I accept the conditions described in this letter. 
  

			
	 Signature: /s/    PIERRE
DUHAMEL        
	  	Date: November 9, 2005
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

CAMELBAK PRODUCTS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”,

Defendants.

Civil Action No.: 1:20-cv-03952

Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey T. Gilbert

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby files this Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal, without prejudice, as to the following Defendant(s) identified on Schedule A of the 

Complaint:

NO. DEFENDANT

218 avianaretailwholesale

216 aquariumworld1106

273 trendysoftworld

271 toywhole65

385 Liberating Outdoor Store

79 KoKossi Outdoor Sporting Store

78 AOLIFE Sporting Store

443 VEQKING Joy Store

440 Traveling World Store

99 Tourism Secret Store

98 Happiness Travel Store

387 LK-Shopping Store

352 Dream outdoor Store

435 Supering Online Store

297 Lan mao zi shi pin

32 IntotheUn

308 vivian_shop

Case: 1:20-cv-03952 Document #: 38 Filed: 09/28/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:9376
DATED: September 28, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt (Bar No. 6207971)

Keith Vogt, Ltd.

111 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1700

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Telephone: 312-675-6079

E-mail: keith@vogtip.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case: 1:20-cv-03952 Document #: 38 Filed: 09/28/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:9377
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document was electronically filed on September 28, 2020 with the Clerk of the Court using the 

CM/ECF system, which will automatically send an email notification of such filing to all registered 

attorneys of record.

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt

Case: 1:20-cv-03952 Document #: 38 Filed: 09/28/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:9378
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 613 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 613

Providing a vote for the Delegate to the Congress from the District of 
 Columbia in the consideration by the House of Representatives of any 
  resolution impeaching the President or Vice President of the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 18, 1998

 Ms. Norton submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing a vote for the Delegate to the Congress from the District of 
 Columbia in the consideration by the House of Representatives of any 
  resolution impeaching the President or Vice President of the United 
                                States.

Whereas rule IX of the Rules of the House of Representatives provides that 
        questions of privilege shall arise whenever the rights of the House 
        collectively or the Members individually in their representative 
        capacity are affected;
Whereas under the precedents, customs, and traditions of the House pursuant to 
        rule IX, a question of privilege has arisen in cases involving the 
        constitutional prerogatives of the House and of Members of the House; 
        and
Whereas the House is prepared to consider a resolution impeaching the President, 
        and the Delegate to the Congress from the District of Columbia seeks to 
        assert the constitutional prerogative to cast a vote in the 
        consideration of the resolution: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. PROVIDING VOTE FOR DELEGATE FROM THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN 
              CONSIDERATION OF PRESIDENTIAL IMPEACHMENT RESOLUTIONS.

    Pursuant to section 2 of article I of the Constitution and the 
twenty-third article of amendment thereto granting the people of the 
District of Columbia the right to vote in presidential elections, the 
Delegate to the Congress from the District of Columbia shall be 
permitted to cast a vote in the House of Representatives in the same 
manner as a member of the House in the consideration by the House of 
any resolution impeaching the President or Vice President of the United 
States.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    Section 1 shall apply with respect to any resolution impeaching the 
President or Vice President of the United States that is considered by 
the House of Representatives after the adoption of this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
Summary of Amendment to Performance-Based Cash Bonus Program for CEO



 Exhibit 10.3 
  
 SUMMARY OF AMENDMENT TO 
 VINTAGE PETROLEUM, INC. 
 PERFORMANCE-BASED CASH BONUS 
 PROGRAM FOR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
  
 On December 22, 2004, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Vintage Petroleum, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), established a performance-based cash bonus program for Charles C. Stephenson, Jr., the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, (the “CEO Bonus Program”), the purpose of which is to
enhance stockholder value by providing Mr. Stephenson with added incentive to achieve certain specific performance goals. 
  
 The CEO Bonus Program establishes a base cash bonus amount of $1.2 million (the “Base Amount”). Under the CEO Bonus program, Mr. Stephenson
has the ability to earn a cash bonus in the amount of 0% to 200% of the Base Amount (or $0 to $2.4 million), based upon the Company’s “total stockholder return” as compared to the “total stockholder return” of each company
in a peer group of companies selected by the Compensation Committee during a performance period commencing on January 1, 2004, and ending on December 31, 2006. The amount of the cash bonus earned, if any, will depend on the
“Company’s rank” among the peer group of companies. In the event of a “change in control” of the Company (as defined in the Company’s 1990 Stock Plan, as amended) prior to the date of determination of whether he is
entitled to a bonus, Mr. Stephenson will receive the Base Amount. 
  
 Effective October 13, 2005, the Compensation Committee modified the CEO Bonus Program to provide that in the event the proposed merger of the Company with and into Occidental Transaction 1, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and
wholly-owned subsidiary of Occidental Petroleum Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Merger”), occurs, Mr. Stephenson will be paid 200% of the Base Amount, or $2.4 million. This amount is payable at the closing of the Merger.
---

---

Exhibit 13.(a).1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Syneron Medical Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby
certify that to the best of our knowledge:

1.       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 6, 2008

| |  | /s/ Doron Gerstel
Doron GerstelChief Executive Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 6, 2008

| |  | /s/ Fabian Tenenbaum
Fabian TenenbaumChief Financial Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
Exhibit 13.7



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Inmarsat Ventures Limited (the Company)
for the annual period ended 31 December 2006 (the Periodic Report), I, Andrew Sukawaty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/     ANDREW
SUKAWATYAndrew Sukawaty Chief Executive Officer




Date: 29 April 2008
9803.

#### Ward *v.*Johnson.

Stephens, J.

‘1. “The husband is bound to support and maintain his '■ ' wife, and his consent shall be presumed to her agency in all purchases of necessaries suitable to her condition and habits Of life, made for the *480use of herself and the family. This presumption may be rebutted by proof.” Civil Code, § 2996. “The husband is bound for necessaries furnished to the wife when separated from him, subject to the limitations hereinbefore -provided. If the wife be living in adultery with another man, the husband is not liable; but notice by the husband shall not relieve him from liability, if his wife is separated from him by reason of his own misconduct; if she voluntarily abandons him without sufficient provocation, notice by the husband shall relieve him of all liability for necessaries furnished to her.” Civil Code, § 2997.

Decided February 26, 1919.

Complaint; from city court of Quitman—Judge *W.*H. Long. April 8, 1918.

*Bennett & Harrell,*for plaintiff. *Branch & Snow,*for defendant.

2. Upon the trial of a suit against a husband for medical services rendered by plaintiff to defendant’s wife, evidence that before the date of the rendition of the services by plaintiff, defendant left the state as a fugitive from justice, carried his wife with him, and that she later returned to the former community and lived upon land belonging to the husband, the husband still remaining away, does not necessarily *demaná*the inference that the parties were living in a state of separation as husband and wife under such circumstances that the husband would not be liable for necessaries such as medical services furnished by plaintiff to the wife.

3. The assignment of error complaining of the court’s Refusal to allow plaintiff, while on the witness stand, to testify along certain lines set out in the assignment, is too indefinite and defective to raise any question for the consideration of this court, it not being shown therein that any pertinent question -was asked and that the answer was ruled out, or that the court was informed at the time what the answer would be, or that the testimony would have benefitted the plaintiff in error. *Griffin*v. *Henderson,*117 *Ga.*382 (2) (43 S. E. 712); *McKee*v. *Hurst,*21 *Ga. App.*571 (94 S. E. 886), and cases there cited.

4. Whether credit was extended to the husband or to the wife, and whether the parties were living in a state of separation as husband and wife under such circumstances as would make him liable for necessaries furnished her, were questions for the jury.

5. The court erred in granting a nonsuit.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
Exhibit 4.33
  Execution Copy
 Fifth Amended and Restated Exclusive Purchase Right Agreement
 eLong, Inc.  Registered Address:
 Guangfu Cui  ID No.:  Address:
 Beijing Asia Media Interactive Advertising Co., Ltd.  Registered Address:  Legal Representative:
 eLongNet Information Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.  Registered Address:  Legal Representative:
 WHEREAS:
 1.
    
    Party A is a company registered and established in Cayman Islands; Party B is a PRC resident;
Party C is a limited liability company established and validly existing in accordance with PRC
laws; Party D is a wholly foreign owned enterprise established and validly existing in
accordance with PRC laws, and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Party A.
 2.
    
    According to the Fourth Exclusive Purchase Right Agreement signed between Party B, Party C, Party
D and Yue Justin Tang, who formerly held a 75% equity interest in Party C, on December 28th, 2007, Yue
Justin Tang offered Party A the exclusive right to purchase Party Cs equity interest held
by Yue Justin Tang.
 3.
    
    According to the Share and Debt Transfer Agreement signed between Party B and Yue Justin Tang
on June 11, 2010, Party B is the transferee of the 75% equity interest in Party C from Yue Justin Tang and
all rights and obligations relating thereto. Party
B currently holds 100% equity of Party C as the result of foresaid assignment.
 4.
    
    To reflect Part Bs succeeding the agreement
signed between Party A, Party C and Party D and Yue Justin Tang, each party hereby
amends and restate the agreement as follows:




---



##### 



Chapter One. Purchases and Sale of Equity Interest
 Authorization
 Procedure
  Purchase Price
  Transfer of the Purchased Equity Interest




---



##### 



Payment
  Chapter Two. Promises Relating to Equity Interest
 Covenants Relating to Party C




---



##### 



Promises Relating Party B
 Party B promises:




---



##### 



Promises Relating Party D
  Representations and Warranties
 Representations and Warranties of Party B and Party C
 Party B and Party C




---



##### 



Effective Date
  Applicable Law and Dispute Resolution
 Applicable Law
  Dispute Resolution




---



##### 



Taxes and Expenses
  Notices
  Party A:  Address:  Fax:  Tel:  Addressee:
 Party B:  Address:  Fax:  Tel:




---



##### 



Party C:  Registered Address:  Fax:  Tel:  Addressee:
 Party D:  Address:  Fax:  Tel:  Addressee:
 Confidentiality
  Further Warranties
  Miscellaneous
 Amendment, Modification and Supplement




---



##### 



Observance of Laws and Regulations
  Entire Contract
  Headings
  Language
  Severability
  Successor
  Survival




---



##### 



Waiver
    Party A:  Signature of Authorized Representative:
 Party B:  Signature:
 Party C:  Signature of Authorized Representative:
Official Seal:
 Party D:  Signature of Authorized Representative:  Official Seal:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cord Blood America, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew
L. Schissler, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company as of December 31, 2007, and for the period then ended.

Dated:  April 15, 2008

                              /s/ Matthew L. Schissler
                              -------------------------------------------------
                              Matthew L. Schissler
                              Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 13.2

Certification

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of LG Display Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: April 30, 2014



/s/ SANGDON KIMSangdon Kim
Director, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 has been provided to LG Display Co., Ltd. and will be retained by LG Display Co., Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.