alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> BD

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,198,652              21,143,346
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0                       0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                                  0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,198,652              21,143,346
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0                       0
<PAYABLES>                                     275,119                 116,083
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0                       0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0                       0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,923,533              21,027,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,198,652              21,143,346
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                    0               (805,664)
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                                 0                 204,729
<COMMISSIONS>                                        0                 361,536
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0               2,434,695
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<COMPENSATION>                                       0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (333,581)               1,472,224
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   (333,581)               1,472,224
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (333,581)               1,472,224
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.06)                   14.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.06)                   14.47


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at December 31, 1998 (Unaudited)
and the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three months ended
December 31, 1998 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          57,679
<SECURITIES>                                   113,784
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               185,463
<PP&E>                                         879,470
<DEPRECIATION>                                 646,251
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,481,161
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          842,922
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       110,584
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,504,808
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,481,161
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  426,648
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,057
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (429,705)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (429,705)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (429,705)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

WHAM-O HOLDING, LTD. and 

INTERSPORT CORP. d/b/a WHAM-O,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE 

“A”,

Defendants.

Civil Action No.: 1:20-cv-04196

Judge Matthew F. Kennelly

Magistrate Judge Maria Valdez

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby files this Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal, without prejudice, as to the following Defendant(s) identified on Schedule A of the 

Complaint:

NO. DEFENDANT

152 Nashion Direct

107 KREZON

6 Aixy Direct

222 UniSweet

27 CASILY

41 Dreamingtrue

96 Jinjin2

24 Bulges

19 BENBW

212 TaiKangWuZi US Shop

134 luermeshoppingus

11 assiduousic

189 Sanmubo Trade

Case: 1:20-cv-04196 Document #: 41 Filed: 09/21/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:2362
DATED: September 21, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt (Bar No. 6207971)

Keith Vogt, Ltd.

111 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1700

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Telephone: 312-675-6079

E-mail: keith@vogtip.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case: 1:20-cv-04196 Document #: 41 Filed: 09/21/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:2363
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document was electronically filed on September 21, 2020 with the Clerk of the Court using the 

CM/ECF system, which will automatically send an email notification of such filing to all registered 

attorneys of record.

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt

Case: 1:20-cv-04196 Document #: 41 Filed: 09/21/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:2364
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-20697

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EDGAR ALEJANDRO SILVA LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:18-CR-227-1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Edgar Alejandro 

Silva Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Silva Lopez has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 7, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-20697 Document: 00514988497 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/07/2019
No. 18-20697

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-20697 Document: 00514988497 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/07/2019
Exhibit 99.1

Annual Statement of
ComplianceProtective Life Secured Trust 2004-28 (the "Trust")

I, Millie
Cicero, a duly elected and acting officer of The Bank of New York ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby certify on
behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that:

1.     I
have reviewed and examined the performance by the Indenture Trustee of the
collection and distribution of trust money pursuant to
Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the Indenture
pursuant to which the Trust's notes (the "Notes") were issued during the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2004 (the "Relevant
Year"); and

2.     Based
upon my review and examination described in 1 above, and except as provided in the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated March 30, 2005, prepared by the Trust's
independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with Section 10 of the Expense and Indemnity
Agreement, to the best of my knowledge, the collection of payments on the funding agreements and distribution of payments to noteholders
pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the
Indenture was performed in a satisfactory manner in all material respects
throughout the Relevant Year.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK, as Indenture Trustee

|By: |  | /s/MILLIE CICERO
      Name:  Millie
      CiceroTitle:    Assistant Treasurer |  |  |  | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | 

Date:  March 30, 2005
10241.

#### Lime Cola Bottling Co. *v.*Harris Tire Co.

Decided June 12, 1919.

Complaint; from city court of Savannah—Judge , Freeman. October 28, 1918.

The action was on an open account consisting of numerous dated items, including such items as: “Pulling car out of mud-hole,” “Going out and starting motor,” “2 hours mechanic’s time going out and starting car,” “Trip to East Savannah to pull car out of sand,” “1 hour mechanic’s time repairing magneto,” etc., each followed by an amount in money; to which the defendant demurred on the ground that the items were too vague, indefinite, and uncertain. Error was assigned on the overruling of the demurrer.

*Robert L. Golding,*for plaintiff in error.

*Edwards & Lesler,*contra.

Luke, J.

There was no error in overruling the demurrer, or in the admission of testimony. The evidence in this ease, which was tried according to law, supported, if it did not demand, the verdict returned for the plaintiff. For no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 1997 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDING MARCH 31, 1997
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       4,641,470
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             3,076,181
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 27,150,110
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    157,178,127
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,254,458
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             199,997,088
<DEPOSITS>                                 185,884,172
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,240,405
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,581
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,844,930
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             199,997,088
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,557,479
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              419,607
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 4,418
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             3,981,504
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,020,030
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,708
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,925,766
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   60,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,757,197
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                347,655
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     347,655
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   225,955
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.13
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,217,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    96,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                504,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,321,331
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  126,904
<RECOVERIES>                                        31
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,254,458
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,254,458
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted), Edward T. Shonsey, the Chief Executive Officer of Diversa Corporation (the Company), and Anthony E. Altig, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Periodic Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic
Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:
August 4, 2006

|                        |  |  |  |                                                           
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|/s/ EDWARD T. SHONSEY   |  |  |  | /s/ ANTHONY E. ALTIG                                      
|Edward T. Shonsey       |  |  |  | Anthony E. Altig                                          
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filling of Diversa Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form
10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

CAROL ANN CARTER, MONICA PARRILLA, REBECCA POYOUROW, WILLIAM TUNG, ROSEANNE MILAZZO, BURT SIEGEL, SUSAN CASSANELLI, LEE CASSANELLI, LYNN WACHMAN, MICHAEL GUTTMAN, MAYA FONKEU, BRADY HILL,

MARY ELLEN BALCHUNIS, TOM DEWALL,

STEPHANIE MCNULTY AND JANET
TEMIN,

Petitioners

v.

LEIGH M. CHAPMAN, IN HER OFFICIAL

CAPACITY AS THE ACTING SECRETARY

OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA; JESSICA MATHIS, IN

HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR

FOR THE PENNSYLV ANIA BUREAU OF ELECTION SERVICES AND NOTARIES,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 7 MM 2022

CONCURRING STATEMENT

CHIEF JUSTICE BAER FILED: February 2, 2022

I join in full the Court’s per curiam order granting Petitioners’ Emergency

Application for Extraordinary Relief and exercising extraordinary jurisdiction under 42

Pa.C.S. § 726 in th is matter. I write separately to set forth my personal rationale for joining

the current order.

On January 10, 2022, this Court denied a request to exercise extraordinary

jurisdiction in this matter, expressly stating that our denial was “without prejudice toPetitioners to reapply for similar relief in this Court, as future developments may dictate. ”

See Per Curiam Order dated January 10, 2022. In the past three weeks, developments

have occurred that no doubt prompted the Petitioner s’ current application and now

necessitate this Court’s action. Specifically, the executive and legislative branches have

failed to agree upon a new map

, and the task of adopting a congressional redistricting

plan is necessarily consigned to the judiciary

.

While the Commonwealth Court has acted expeditiously to address this matter,

the threat of any appeal period from t he Commonwealth Court d ecision to this Court

reduces the scant days available for this Court to obtain briefs, study this complex and

important matter, and render a decision, all of which must occur before potential

candidates gather signatures and prepare for the May 17, 2022 primary election

.

In consideration of the many deadlines and the need for speedy resolution of this

matter for the benefit of potential candidates and voters, I am compelled to join the grant

of extraordinary jurisdiction.
9957.

#### Neal *v.*Hudgins.

Decided January 14, 1919.

Action on contract; from Pike superior court—Judge Searcy. May 17, 1918.

Luke, J.

Before a recovery may be had upon a contract for the sale of goods of the value of more than fifty dollars, the contract must be in writing, or there must be part performance or payment of earnest money, or some memorandum which is specific as to parties and terms, etc. The contract declared upon in this case is clearly within the statute of frauds. See Civil Code (1910), § 3223 (7); *Oglesby Grocery Co.*v. *Williams Manufacturing Co.,*112 *Ga.*359 (37 S. E. 372) ; *Sivell*v. *Hogan,*119 *Ga.*167 (46 S. E. 67), and cases cited. The court did not err in sustaining the general demurrer to the petition.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.*

*223The petition alleged: “Defendant is indebted to petitioner in the sum of $326.25, for that the said defendant did, on the —• day of-, 1916, execute to petitioner his contract for his delivery of certain cotton, and which he failed to do, thereby causing a breach of said contract, to the injury and damage of petitioner in the . sum mentioned above.” By amendment it was alleged: “The defendant wanted to sell plaintiff 9 bales of cotton at 12 cents per pound, each to weigh 500 pounds, to be delivered at Neal, Ga., between the first day of October and the 30th day of November, 1916, said cotton to grade ‘Atlanta Middling (4s).’ Plaintiff told défendant that he did not care to buy the cotton. Defendant then insisted that plaintiff sell said cotton for him. This the plaintiff agreed to do as an accommodation to the defendant, and this was to be done without any profit or compensation to the plaintiff at all, and in March or April, 1916, did sell said cotton to George W. Cavenaugh & Co. for 12 cents per pound. When said cotton was to be delivered by defendant, under his agreement with plaintiff, he failed and refused to deliver the same, and plaintiff, to comply with the contract he had made for defendant, was forced to buy on the market 9 bales of cotton, and had to pay for it 19-1/4 cents per pound, that being the market price for that grade of cotton at the time and place of delivery, to wit, Neal, Ga. By reason of defendant’s failure to comply with his said contract, plaintiff has been injured and damaged’ in the sum of $326.25, this being the difference between the price for which plaintiff sold said cotton for defendant and the market price that plaintiff had to pay for the same grade of cotton at the time and place of delivery.”

*E. F. Dupree,*for plaintiff. *W. Y. Allen,*for defendant.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Benjamin Garner, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04693

Honorable John Z. Lee

Allstate Insurance Company

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, April 1, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: In light of the Supreme Court's

decision in Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid, −−− S. Ct. −−−−, No. 19−511, 2021 WL 1215717

(U.S. Apr. 1, 2021), the Court directs the parties to file supplemental briefs on the issue of

how the Supreme Court's decision affects Defendant's pending motion to dismiss [17].

Each party's supplemental brief shall be limited to 8 pages. Defendant's supplemental brief

is due by 4/16/21, and Plaintiffs' responsive supplemental brief is due by 4/30/21.

Furthermore, the Court denies as moot Defendant's alternative motion to stay. Mailed

notice (cn).

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04693 Document #: 36 Filed: 04/01/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:195
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03758

Honorable Thomas M. Durkin

Long Leaf Trading Group, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, December 15, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Hearing on the motion

for entry of default against Andrew Nelson [46] set for 12/23/2020 at 9:00 a.m. will

proceed by telephone. To join the telephone conference, dial 877−402−9757, Access Code

4410831. Mailed notice. (ecw, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 47 Filed: 12/15/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:329