alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Mercari Communications Group, Ltd. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report),
Tim F. Holderbaum, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Tim F. HolderbaumTim
      F. HolderbaumTitle:
      Chief Financial OfficerDate:
      December 30, 2009








This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
EXHIBIT B

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 145-2 Filed: 04/05/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:2897
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Master File No. 3:15-cv-03747-JD

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE PROPOSED CURATIVE NOTICE BY LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

In re FACEBOOK BIOMETRIC INFORMATION 

PRIVACY LITIGATION

This Document Relates To: 

ALL ACTIONS.

Master File No. 3:15-cv-03747-JD

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE PROPOSED 

CURATIVE NOTICE BY LEVI & 

KORSINSKY, LLP

Hon. James Donato 

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 145-2 Filed: 04/05/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:2898 Case 3:15-cv-03747-JD Document 494 Filed 10/08/20 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Master File No. 3:15-cv-03747-JD

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE PROPOSED CURATIVE NOTICE BY LEVI & KORSINSKY, LLP

Having received and reviewed Levi & Korsinsky, LLP’s proposed curative notice, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Within two (2) business days from the date of this Order, Levi & Korsinsky, LLP shall

send the proposed corrective notice out via email to the 3,724 impacted class members who responded 

to the ad posted by Levi & Korsinsky, LLP; 

2. Within five (5) business days from the date the curative notice is sent, Levi &

Korsinsky, LLP shall provide the Settlement Administrator, Gilardi & Co. LLC, with a list of the 

names and email addresses of those 3,724 individuals; and

3. Within five (5) business days from the date the curative notice is sent, Levi &

Korsinsky, LLP shall file an affidavit with the Court affirming that notice has been completed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ______________________ 

___________________________ 

Honorable James Donato 

United States District Judge

10/8/2020

Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 145-2 Filed: 04/05/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:2899 Case 3:15-cv-03747-JD Document 494 Filed 10/08/20 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       144,584,244
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             149,584,244
<CASH>                                      18,744,457
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                          44,938,128
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       3,930,577
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             229,186,432
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             61,605,054
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          1,432,311
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      132,164,254
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       280,057
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,062,253
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               229,186,432
<PREMIUMS>                                   6,547,542
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          4,019,724
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             130,880
<OTHER-INCOME>                               1,624,055
<BENEFITS>                                   7,750,000
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    315,254
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,658,233)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,658,233)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,658,233)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.61)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              90,200,000
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                          7,750,000
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                           90,200,000
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             61,605,054
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

FITNESS ANYWHERE LLC 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HOTBUY88 STORE, et al. 

Defendants. 

Case No. 20-cv-04916 

Judge John J. Tharp, Jr. 

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey I. Cummings 

SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT 

WHEREAS, a judgment was entered in the above action on October 23, 2020 [46], in 

favor of Plaintiff Fitness Anywhere LLC (“Plaintiff”) and against the Defendants Identified in 

Schedule A in the amount detailed in the chart below (“Judgment Amount”), and Plaintiff 

acknowledges payment of an agreed upon damages amount, costs, and interest and desires to 

release this judgment and hereby fully and completely satisfy the same as to the following 

Defendant: 

Defendant Name Judgment Amount Line No. 

Your first Sporting Store $13,830 11 

THEREFORE, full and complete satisfaction of said judgment as to the above-referenced 

Defendant is hereby acknowledged, and the Clerk of the Court is hereby authorized and directed 

to make an entry of the full and complete satisfaction on the docket of said judgment. 

Case: 1:20-cv-04916 Document #: 55 Filed: 12/04/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:2298
2 

Dated this 4th day of December 2020. Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Jake M. Christensen 

Amy C. Ziegler 

Justin R. Gaudio 

Jake M. Christensen 

Martin F. Trainor 

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. 

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

312.360.0080 

312.360.9315 (facsimile) 

 aziegler@gbc.law 

 jgaudio@gbc.law 

 jchristensen@gbc.law 

 mtrainor@gbc.law 

Counsel for Plaintiff Fitness Anywhere LLC

Case: 1:20-cv-04916 Document #: 55 Filed: 12/04/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:2299
Order entered October 15, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01100-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.Q., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 304th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. JD-12-00702-W

ORDER

As the reporter’s record was filed October 14, 2013, we VACATE our October 9, 2013 

order submitting the appeal without the reporter’s record. Appellant shall file her brief within 

twenty (20) days of the date of this order. 

/Michael J. O’Neill/

MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

PRESIDING JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Amended Financial Data Schedule -- 8/30/96
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-30-1996
<CASH>                                         228,830
<SECURITIES>                                   181,520
<RECEIVABLES>                                  344,192
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,992
<INVENTORY>                                    368,862
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,144,724
<PP&E>                                         466,797
<DEPRECIATION>                                 217,227
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,452,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          358,369
<BONDS>                                        386,927
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           105
<OTHER-SE>                                     700,464
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,452,198
<SALES>                                      2,817,191
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,817,191
<CGS>                                        2,534,813
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,534,813
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               105,302
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,651
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,650
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                173,077
<INCOME-TAX>                                    58,845
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            114,232
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   114,232
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.08
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 8**
| **Name of  subsidiary**                 | ** ** | **Incorporated in:** |
|-----------------------------------------|------------|----------------------|
| ** **                              |       |                 |
| **Operating company**                   |       |                 |
| Interbus AB                             |       | Sweden               |
| Swebus AB                               |       | Sweden               |
| Swebus Busco AB                         |       | Sweden               |
| Sweden Express AB                       |       | Sweden               |
|                                    |       |                 |
| **Foreign subsidiaries**                | ** ** | ** **           |
| Concordia Bus Finland Oy AB             |       | Finland              |
| Ingenior M.O. Schoyens Bilcentraler A/S |       | Norway               |
|                                    |       |                 |
| **Real estate companies**               |       |                 |
| Swebus fastigheter AB                   |       | Sweden               |
| Subsidiaries to Swebus Fastigheter AB:  |       |                 |
| Alpus AB                                |       | Sweden               |
| Malmfältens Omnibus AB             |       | Sweden               |
| Enköping-Bålsta Fastighets AB |       | Sweden               |
|                                    |       |                 |
| **Dormant companies**                   |       |                 |
| Arlanda buss AB                         |       | Sweden               |
| Billingens Trafik AB                    |       | Sweden               |
| Enköping-Bålsta Trafik AB     |       | Sweden               |
| Gävle Trafik AB                    |       | Sweden               |
| Hälsinge Wasatrafik AB             |       | Sweden               |
| AB Härnösandsbuss             |       | Sweden               |
| Karlstadsbuss AB                        |       | Sweden               |
| AB Kristinehamns Omnibusstrafik         |       | Sweden               |
| Saltsjöbuss AB                     |       | Sweden               |
| Swebus Service AB                       |       | Sweden               |
| Swebus Västerås AB            |       | Sweden               |
| Tumlare Buss AB                         |       | Sweden               |
| Wasabuss AB                             |       | Sweden               |
| Wasatrafik AB                           |       | Sweden               |

 

----
Description

Problem

Conventional Electron Spin Resonance 

(ESR) technologies can only claim to have 

detected the existence of a single defect 

with very little understanding of the defect's 

identity. Additionally, each of these 

technologies has its own specific 

limitations and all currently lack the ability 

to acquire precise spectroscopic 

information. 

Invention

Thenew High Definition-ESR(HD-ESR) 

spectrometer utilizesasuperior detection scheme 

to perform electron spin resonance 

measurements. The major innovation centerson 

theuseof ashorted coaxial “probe” (assmall asa 

few nanometers) to excite thesampleunder test 

using near-field microwave radiation. This 

approach provides10ordersof magnitude 

sensitivity improvement compared to 

conventional spectrometers.Another innovation 

istheuseof adonut-shaped, small permanent

magnet to createahighlyuniform magnetic field 

for this very small probe. This greatly simplified 

technology can scan across a sample producing 

spectroscopic and spatially determined atomicscaledefect information. 

Contact

Technology Partnerships Office (TPO) 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899 

TPO@NIST.GOV 

Benefits

Commercial Application

The key breakthrough in HD-ESR is not 

the ability to measure single defects, but 

the ability to measure single defects 

with the comprehensive spectroscopic 

information necessary to understand 

their physical and chemical nature. It 

has a multitude of applications, e.g., 

anthropology, fuel science physiology, 

and meteorology. 

Competitive Advantage 

HD-ESR can laterally scan across the 

surface of any sample and characterize 

defects at or beneath the surface without 

making contact. For example, a fully active 

transistor can be probed with all the 

electrical connections in place. Transistor 

instabilities and/or performance degradation 

can be accurately linked to the presence 

and specific location of atomic-scale defects 

located within the active area of a highlyscaled device. Detrimental fabrication 

processes can be easily modified to mitigate 

unwanted defect profiles and boost 

performance.

Electron Spin Resonance Spectrometer 

and Method for Using Same 

Patent US 9,507,004

Ref No. 13-004
CFTC Ex. 397

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 1 of 30 PageID #:1077
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 2 of 30 PageID #:1078
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 3 of 30 PageID #:1079
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 4 of 30 PageID #:1080
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 5 of 30 PageID #:1081
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 6 of 30 PageID #:1082
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 7 of 30 PageID #:1083
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 8 of 30 PageID #:1084
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 9 of 30 PageID #:1085
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 10 of 30 PageID #:1086
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 11 of 30 PageID #:1087
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 12 of 30 PageID #:1088
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 13 of 30 PageID #:1089
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 14 of 30 PageID #:1090
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 15 of 30 PageID #:1091
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 16 of 30 PageID #:1092
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 17 of 30 PageID #:1093
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 18 of 30 PageID #:1094
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 19 of 30 PageID #:1095
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 20 of 30 PageID #:1096
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 21 of 30 PageID #:1097
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 22 of 30 PageID #:1098
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 23 of 30 PageID #:1099
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 24 of 30 PageID #:1100
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 25 of 30 PageID #:1101
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 26 of 30 PageID #:1102
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 27 of 30 PageID #:1103
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 28 of 30 PageID #:1104
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 29 of 30 PageID #:1105
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-11 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 30 of 30 PageID #:1106
digests
MON-AM1

Model-based Performance Evaluation

Chairs: M. Ani Hsieh & Paul Evans
MON-AM2

Special Session I: Performance Metrics for Sustainable Manufacturing

Organizers: Kevin Lyons, Mahesh Mani & Ram Sriram
MON-PM1

Performance Assessment and Reliability of Unmanned Systems

Chairs: Hui-Min Huang & Coire Maranzano
MON-PM2

Special Session II: Test and Evaluation of Unmanned and Autonomous Systems

Organizers: Mauricio Castillo-Effen & Nikita Visnevski
TUE-AM1

The Role of Robotics Competitions in Advancing Intelligent Systems

Chairs: Stephen Balakirsky & Jason Gorman
TUE-AM2

Special Session III: Is an Agent Theory of Mind Valuable for Adaptive, 

Intelligent Systems?

Organizer: Gary Berg-Cross
TUE-PM1

Ground Truth and Testbeds for Performance Testing

Chairs: Tsai Hong & Barry Bodt
TUE-PM2

Special Session IV: An Ontology for Robotics Science and Systems

Organizers: Erwin Prassler & Herman Bruyninckx
WED-AM1

Performance Measures for Mobile Robots

Chairs: Alan Bowling & Rolf Lakaemper
WED-AM2

Special Session V: TRANSTAC: Performance Evaluation of Speech Translation 

Systems for Military Applications

Organizers: Craig Schlenoff & Brian Weiss
WED-PM1

Issues in Designing Intelligent Systems 

Chairs: Danil Prokhorov & Satyandra Gupta
WED-PM2 

Special Session VI: Performance Measurements Towards Improved Forklift Safety

Organizer: Roger Bostelman
EXHIBIT
31.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO






SECTION
302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






March 25,
2009






I,
Margaret S. Fritz, Vice President and senior officer in charge of securitization
of CDF Funding, Inc., certify that:






1.           I
have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to
be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10–K of GE
Dealer Floorplan Master Note Trust (the ‘‘Exchange Act periodic
reports’’);






2.           Based
on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;




3.           Based
on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10–D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.           Based
on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report
under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the
servicing agreements; and




5.           All
of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this
report on Form 10–K.









In giving
the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me
by the following unaffiliated party:  Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas.







/s/ Margaret S.
Fritz


Name: Margaret S. Fritz


Title:   Vice
President and senior officer in


charge ofsecuritization
EXHIBIT 33.1

                      GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION

                       Management Assessment of Compliance

                                 March 26, 2007

Management of the General Electric Capital Corporation (the "Company") is
responsible for assessing compliance with the applicable servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, relating to the servicing of a commercial floorplan receivable,
accounts receivable, and asset based lending receivable securities program (the
"Platform"). The Company has determined that only servicing criteria
1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iv) and 1122(d)(3)(i) are applicable to the
activities it performs with respect to the Platform ("Applicable Servicing
Criteria"), as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006 (the
"Reporting Period"). The individual asset-backed transactions and securities
defined by management as constituting the Platform are as follows: GE Dealer
Floorplan Master Note Trust Series 2004-1, 2004-2, 2005-1, 2005-2, 2006-1,
2006-2, 2006-3 and 2006-4.

The Company's management has assessed the Company's compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Reporting Period. In making this
assessment, management used the servicing criteria set forth by the Securities
and Exchange Commission in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB.

Based on such assessment, management believes that, other than as identified
below, as of and for the Reporting Period, the Company has complied in all
material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

Instance of Material Non-compliance: An instance of material noncompliance
related to a criterion set forth in Item 1122(d)(3)(i)(C) was noted. The Form
10-K for GE Dealer Floorplan Master Note Trust for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005 was not filed within 90 days from the end of such fiscal year.
Instead, such Form 10-K was filed on May 19, 2006. After discussions with the
staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the staff allowed the shelf
registration statement relating to GE Dealer Floorplan Master Note Trust, for
which CDF Funding, Inc. is the depositor, to become effective notwithstanding
the late filing.
<PAGE>


KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report
with respect to management's assessment of compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria as of and for the Reporting Period.

                                           GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL
                                           CORPORATION, acting through its GE
                                           Commercial Financial Services segment

                                           /s/ Margaret Fritz
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Margaret S. Fritz,
                                           Capital Markets Leader