alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      --------------------------------------------------------------------

     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 of BrightStar Information Technology
Group, Inc. (the "Form 10-Q"), I, Paul C. Kosturos, Chief Financial Officer, of
BrightStar Information Technology Group, Inc., certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (3)  such Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 fully
          complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (4)  the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
          ended March 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
          financial condition and results of operations of BrightStar
          Information Technology Group, Inc.


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to BrightStar
Information Technology Group, Inc. and will be retained by BrightStar
Information Technology Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: May 13, 2004                                   BY: /s/ Paul C. Kosturos
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Paul C. Kosturos
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


                                       18
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mercari Communications Group, Ltd. on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, L. Michael Underwood, President/Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/ L. Michael UnderwoodL. Michael UnderwoodPresident(Principal Executive Officer)
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|September 18, 2008
|------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 451

Congratulating the Chicago Board of Trade and the city of Chicago, Illinois,

on the occasion of the 150th anniversary of the establishment of the

Chicago Board of Trade.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 3, 1998

Mr. DAVIS of Illinois submitted the following resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

RESOLUTION

Congratulating the Chicago Board of Trade and the city

of Chicago, Illinois, on the occasion of the 150th anniversary of the establishment of the Chicago Board of Trade.

Whereas in 1998 the Chicago Board of Trade is observing

the 150th anniversary of its establishment;

Whereas the Chicago Board of Trade has made essential contributions to financial growth in Chicago, Illinois, and in

the Nation;

Whereas futures markets were developed by finance pioneers

in Chicago and today Chicago remains the commercial

crossroads of the world;

Whereas the Chicago Board of Trade is the oldest and largest futures and options exchange and is continuing its
2

•HRES 451 IH

traditions of innovation, service, and leadership in global

finance;

Whereas the accomplishments of the Chicago Board of Trade

during the past 150 years include such major achievements as inventing grain futures, founding the premier

trade clearing system in the world, launching the first

stock options exchange, developing the first interest rate

futures, advancing the use of technology with an electronic trading system, and constructing the largest and

most technologically advanced trading floor in the world;

Whereas the Chicago Board of Trade and its members have

achieved success while adhering to the highest standards

of uncompromising integrity; and

Whereas the Chicago Board of Trade will continue to be a

leader among the financial institutions of the world into

the next millennium: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) congratulates the Chicago Board of Trade

3 and the city of Chicago, Illinois, on the occasion of

4 the 150th anniversary of the establishment of the

5 Chicago Board of Trade; and

6 (2) urges the Chicago Board of Trade to con7 tinue its innovation, service, and leadership into the

8 next millennium.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          110869
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    21882
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       6306
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                153917
<PP&E>                                           95293
<DEPRECIATION>                                   41907
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  219372
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            47025
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           203
<OTHER-SE>                                      155141
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    219372
<SALES>                                         107826
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                107826
<CGS>                                            96101
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    96101
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  96
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  13181
<INCOME-TAX>                                      5463
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               7718
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      7718
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31**

**Section302 Certifications**

I,Robert W. Marsik, certify that:

1.       I havereviewed this quarterly report on form 10-QSB of Mercari Communications Group, Ltd.

2.       Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact  necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with  respect to theperiod covered by this report;

3.       Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in  all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the  periodspresented in this report;

4.       I amresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer andhave:

a.       Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our  supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is  madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b.       Designedsuch disclosure control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting got be  designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation  offinancial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;

c.       Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report  our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report  based onsuch evaluation; and

d.       Disclosedin this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred  during the small business issuer’s fourth fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,  thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.       I havedisclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the small business  issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of thesmall issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.       Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting  which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thesmall business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report  financialinformation; and

b.       Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small  business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting

Date: February27, 2007
No. 87-6139.

#### Hunter *v.*United States District Court for the Western District of Washington.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
!"#$%&'($)  

*+, -(".'&//0#1 

2$/$.3".'0#1 !"#$4567$8) 953:$) 

;< =$8$7>"??(>'@'=$!@58' 5.3$8A@B"(C5($DE,FG/@8?$86&##&@.'@"??$"8".3?"8'&B&?"'$&.'=$"7@H$I$.'&'($3"B'&@.@.7$="(/@/ 

7>J=@6;="H$7$$.8$'"&.$3, 

;"6"6$67$8&.:@@3#'".3&.:".3$(&:&7($'@?8"B'&B$7$/@8$'=$/@((@J&.:B@58'#) %&'($@/!@58' 2"'$K36&''$3  



;="H$B588$.'(><@8J&'=&.'=$>$"8?8$B$3&.:'=$3"'$@/'=&#"??(&B"'&@.<6"3$?8@="BH&B$"??(&B"'&@.#'@'=&# !@58'&.'=$/@((@J&.:"B'&@.#)  !"#$4567$8  !"#$%&'($ 2"'$@/K??(&B"'&@. 0L8".'$3@82$.&$31M    M;/3$.&$3<?($"#$$N?("&.) 0K''"B="33&'&@."(/@86&/ .$B$##"8>1 -58#5".''@A@B"(C5($DE,FO0"1<"??(&B".'#J=@3@.@'="H$".@//&B$J&'=&.'=$4@8'=$8.2&#'8&B'@/;((&.@A#'3$#&:."'$<"''=$ '&6$@//&(&.:'=$&8&.&'&"(.@'&B$@8?($"3&.:<"6$67$8@/'=$7"8@/'=&#!@58'="H&.:".@//&B$J&'=&.'=&#'8&B'5?@.J=@#$8H&B$@/ ?"?$8#6">7$6"3$, 	
	PP
	
Q	
	
R S
  

;/>@5="H$.@'3$#&:."'$3(@B"(B@5.#$(<A@B"(C5($DE,FO071?8@H&3$#'="''=$3$#&:."'&@.65#'7$6"3$J&'=&.'=&8'>0ET13">#,

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection,

Townsone Financial, Inc. and Barry Sturner

20-cv-4176

Franklin U. Valderrama

Karen S. Bloom

the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection

N/A

x

New York; SDNY; 2nd Circuit 9/06; 4/11; 4/21

5th Circuit / 9th Circuit / 11th Circuit

Washington DC

Massachusetts

11/21; 4/21; 4/22

12/05

8/06

Case: 1:20-cv-04176 Document #: 69 Filed: 08/04/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:338
	

  !" "# !!"$%&'% !(%!# %&&!!"  '%) %"# )%"#

* + * + * + *  !)%# * +

,-./0123456313
78
3
9:	
1;

331

;<=;	
>8 813938:39?931:2;

	
9
32
@3;:32


?
33


?
3 31	
>3;8@9


8;A 0
;B8	31C31
3	D3;813,3E

310		
3
;F;;13C31
3	D3;82

 F
G;	H8;

	D
8
:;2
		118		9;3@A0;	8;	931I8913?3
?
8; 3A FJ E /	3
F
?831K	
 K	
>,@ K	
>L2G
@ L,@ G
,@ M
;;	,@J0

	 K	
>K;; FK;; B33@JF8
,8@ D
9 F N0CD3; O3PC3,8@ /@	K;;

QR&)%STUVWVV!!X!YW+)Z![\WT]%%&! )%W^ +_R`aK39P
?33

@92
33
;1
	
?

313;@

33?	31
D38A. 113;@

33b	c
defgAhh.1133

;@

3
deihAhhAK;@

33?	 @
393
13
D38AC3

;@

3
	393

8	 3	9AK	

3138;@

3@8@;
j;;@

31@8;
A

B
AeeJekJlhem

x

x

x

x

x

8/4/22 Karen S. Bloom

Bloom Karen

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection

1700 G Street NW

Washington DC 20552

202-435-7012

karen.s.bloom@usdoj.gov

Case: 1:20-cv-04176 Document #: 69 Filed: 08/04/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:339
#### Bhupinder Singh BAL, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-73663.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 6, 2004.*

Decided Dec. 9, 2004.

Marshall G. Whitehead, Esq., Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration *&*Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, District Director, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Phoenix, AZ, OIL, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*559Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Bhupinder Singh Bal, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision summarily affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying Bal’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the IJ’s findings, *see Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1244 (9th Cir.2000), and we deny the petition in part, and grant the petition in part.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s finding that Bal failed to demonstrate a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of an enumerated ground. *See Abedini v. INS,*971 F.2d 188, 191-92 (9th Cir.1992). Bal failed to provide direct and specific evidence that would support a reasonable fear that he faces persecution based on his political or religious beliefs. He left India after an incident where he struck and killed a sacred cow with his tractor, but he was never arrested, detained, or harmed. *See id.*at 191 (stating that “the possibility of prosecution for an act deemed criminal in [a] society, which is made applicable to all people in that country” is not persecution).

Because Bal failed to demonstrate that he was eligible for asylum, it follows that he did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Lata,*204 F.3d at 1244.

Bal contends, and respondent concedes, that the BIA did not review Bal’s CAT claim under the proper legal standard. Therefore, we remand for the BIA to reassess Bal’s CAT claim under the appropriate standard. *See Kamalthas v. INS,*251 F.3d 1279, 1283-84 (9th Cir.2001).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; GRANTED in part and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is *not*appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**Exhibit 13.8**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F of Inmarsat Ventures Limited (the “Company”)for the annual period ended 31 December 2006 (the “Periodic Report”), I, Rick Medlock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

Date: 27 April 2007
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40552 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. HECTOR ARIEL BELMARES-HERNANDEZ Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-421 Before KING, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Hector Ariel Belmares-Hernandez (Belmares) has moved for leave to withdrawand has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Belmares has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s briefdiscloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave towithdrawis GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D February 20, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
#### Barbara BARTNOF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ed MESSINGER, an individual; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 03-56134.

D.C. No. CV-01-08879-SJO.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 6, 2004.*

Decided Dec. 20, 2004.

Barbara Bartnof, Redondo Beach, CA, pro se.

Denise Walter, Stuart Mandel, Mandel & Manpearl, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

*614Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Barbara Bartnof appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment for defendants in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that various individuals conspired to violate her constitutional rights. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Brewster v. Shasta County,*275 F.3d 803, 806 (9th Cir.2001), and we affirm.

The district court properly held that Bartnofs conclusory allegations that Los Angeles County investigator Ed Messinger conspired with others to obtain an improper search warrant failed to undermine the warrant’s validity and establish a constitutional violation. *See Franks v. Delaware,*438 U.S. 154, 171-72, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978); *see also Navarro v. Barthel,*952 F.2d 331, 332 (9th Cir.1991) (applying *Franks*to the civil rights context). Because Messinger did not violate a constitutional right, the district court properly concluded that he was entitled to qualified immunity. *See Jackson v. City of Bremerton,*268 F.3d 646, 651 (9th Cir. 2001)

Contrary to Bartnofs contention, the district court properly concluded that her declarations did not raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the Los Angeles County District Attorneys’ Office engaged in a pattern and practice of seeking search warrants based on unsubstantiated and improbable information. *See Villiarimo v. Aloha Island Air, Inc.,*281 F.3d 1054, 1061 (9th Cir.2002) (holding no genuine issue of material fact where the only evidence presented is “uncorroborated and self-serving testimony”).

Bartnofs remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Illinois State Rifle Association, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04270

Honorable Mary M. Rowland

Brendan F. Kelly, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, June 17, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Intervenors' motion to

file amended complaint [89] is granted. Amended complaint must be filed as a separate

docket entry. Defendants are given until 7/16/21 to answer or otherwise plead. Mailed

notice. (dm, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04270 Document #: 90 Filed: 06/17/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:535