alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 223 (Wednesday, November 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 68884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27440]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Meeting of the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the 
Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As stipulated by the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the U.S. 
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) is hereby giving notice 
that a meeting of the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Advisory Committee 
(CFSAC) will take place via webinar. This webinar will be open to the 
public. Registration is required for those who wish to provide public 
testimony.

DATES: The CFSAC webinar will be held Wednesday, December 3, 2014, from 
12:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. (ET) and Thursday, December 4, 2014, from 12:30 
p.m. to 5:00 p.m. (ET).

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be conducted by webinar.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara James, Senior Public Health 
Advisor, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Advisory Committee, Department of 
Health and Human Services, Office on Women's Health, 200 Independence 
Avenue SW., Room 728F, Washington, DC 20201. Phone: 202-690-7650; Fax: 
202-260-6537. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d5b6b3a6b4b695bdbda6fbb2baa3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="93f0f5e0f2f0d3fbfbe0bdf4fce5">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CFSAC is authorized under 42 U.S.C. 
217a, Section 222 of the Public Health Service Act, as amended. The 
purpose of the CFSAC is to provide advice and recommendations to the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services, through the Assistant Secretary 
for Health, on issues related to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic 
fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). The issues can include factors affecting 
access and care for persons with ME/CFS; the science and definition of 
ME/CFS; and broader public health, clinical, research and educational 
issues related to ME/CFS.
    The agenda for this meeting and instructions to access the webinar 
will be posted on the CFSAC Web site www.hhs.gov/advcomcfs/. The 
webinar will use Adobe Acrobat Connect Pro Meeting. Please test your 
computer prior to participation at http://admin.adobeconnect.com/common/help/en/support/meeting_test.htm. Oral public comment will be 
scheduled for this webinar. Registration and instructions for 
scheduling public comments and submitting public testimony are 
available at www.blsmeetings.net/cfsac.

    Dated: November 14, 2014.
Nancy C. Lee,
Designated Federal Officer, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Advisory 
Committee, U.S. Department of Health and Human Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-27440 Filed 11-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-42-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case: 3:20-cv-50313 Document #: 93 Filed: 10/23/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:699
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) 

) 20 CR 400

WENDELL KEMP, ) Judge Martha M. Pacold

)

)

Defendant. )

WENDELL KEMP’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO 

EXPAND CONDITIONS OF BOND

NOW COMES Defendant, WENDELL KEMP, through his counsel, 

JOSHUA B. ADAMS, and respectfully requests this honorable court amend the 

conditions of his release and remove Mr. Kemp from home incarceration and 

place him on a nightly curfew. In support of his motion, Mr. Kemp states the 

following.

1. On July 28, 2020 this honorable court admitted Mr. Kemp to an 

unsecured bond and ordered him placed on home incarceration. 

2. Mr. Kemp has fully complied with all conditions of his release since his 

initial appearance.

3. Additionally, Mr. Kemp secured employment at Platinum Detail in 

Bourbonnais, Illinois. His hours of employment are from 9am to 6pm 

Monday through Saturday.
4. Mr. Kemp respectfully requests this honorable court downgrade his 

term of pre-trial release from home incarceration to a nightly curfew, 

to enable him to take care of personal errands and other family 

accommodations.

5. Pre-trial Services does not object to this request

6. The government does not object to this request. 

Therefore, Mr. Kemp respectfully requests this honorable court modify the 

conditions of his bond and place him on a nightly curfew.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Joshua B. Adams

Joshua B. Adams

Counsel for Wendell Kemp

LAW OFFICES OF JOSHUA B. ADAMS, P.C.

53 W. Jackson Blvd., Suite 1615

Chicago, IL 60604

(312) 566-9173
#### Omar Schober v. The Judge of Probate for the County of Wayne.

*Probate*— Petition *for allowance of foreign will.*

A probate judge should entertain a petition for the allowance of a • will if there is any law to authorize him to do so; it is unimportant that the petitioner makes his application under the wrong statute.

Mandamus to require the respondent to entertain relator’s petition for the allowance of the will of Gottlieb Grabo under which relator had interests. Grabo had died in Prussia and the will had already been allowed by the king’s court at Wittenberg. Petitioner asked that an authenticated copy be allowed by respondent under Comp. L. §§ 4342-3, and that notice of the hearing thereof should be given. Respondent refused, holding that the case was not within those provisions, and that he had no jurisdiction, but held that relator should first proceed under Act 101 of 1881.

Motion submitted October 17.

Granted October 18.

*George Gartner*for relator.

Per Curiam.

We think it was respondent’s duty to entertain the application in case there was any law for it, and the answer admits that the Act of 1881 covered the case so far as to authorize cognizance to be taken of the application.

The circumstance that the relator' mistook the statute which was appropriate was of no importance.

Order allowed.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 95-30510

JOSEPH ONCALE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

SUNDOWNER OFFSHORE SERVICES INCORPORATED; 

JOHN LYONS; DANNY PIPPEN; BRANDON JOHNSON,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Louisiana

April 30, 1998

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before SMITH, DUHÉ and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

This matter is before the Court on remand from the Supreme

Court.

IT IS ORDERED that Appellees’ motions for this Court to

establish a briefing schedule and to affirm the district court’s

grant of summary judgment are DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is hereby remanded to

the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

Louisiana for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion of

the Supreme Court herein.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of First Consulting Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation(the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

 

(i)    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 26, 2004 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: May 5, 2004 | /s/ LUTHER  J. NUSSBAUM                            |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|               | Luther J.  Nussbaum                                |
|               | Chairman of  the Board and Chief Executive Officer |

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238.  This certification shall not be deemed“filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, nor shall it be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Companyunder the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before or after thedate hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of BLACKWATER MIDSTREAM CORP. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael D. Suder, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  June 28, 2010By:
/S/ MICHAEL D. SUDERMichael D. SuderChief Executive Officer
| **Exhibit 32.1** |
|------------------|

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to the officer’s knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| November 10, 2005 | By:    | /s/              David A. Wheat                      |   |
|-------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| (Date)

     |   | David A. Wheat

Director, Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

  |   |
Exhibit 32.1





Section 1350 Certification
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Symmetry Medical Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), does hereby certify that:





The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2011 (the "Form 10-K") of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.





Dated:March 7, 2011


/s/  THOMAS J. SULLIVANThomas J. Sullivan

Chief Executive Officer/s/  FRED L. HITEFred L. Hite

Chief Financial Officer
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Essix Holdings, LLC, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 68 3 C.D. 2021

:

Michael Dengel :

(Workers' Compensation Appeal Board), :

Respondent :

PER CURIAM

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 12 th d ay of May 2022, it is ordered that the above

captioned opinion filed on March 25, 2022

, shall be designated OPINION, rather

than MEMORANDUM OPINION, and it shall be reported.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of NexGen Biofuels Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Ram
Ajjarapu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, following due inquiry, I believe that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company. and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                                         NEXGEN BIOFUELS LTD.

August 11, 2009                                          By: /s/ J. Ram Ajjarapu
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         J. RAM AJJARAPU
                                                         CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
```
#### In re: Stanley Lorenzo WILLIAMS, Petitioner.

No. 04-7229.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 22, 2004.

Decided Dec. 29, 2004.

Stanley Lorenzo Williams, Petitioner pro se.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Stanley Lorenzo Williams filed a petition for writ of mandamus alleging undue delay in the district court’s ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. Williams filed his § 2254 petition in April 2003. The district court ruled on the petition on September 7, 2004, after Williams filed his mandamus petition. Accordingly, the mandamus petition is now moot. Therefore, although we grant Williams’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 10, 2017

No. 04-17-00106-CV

Richard TAYLOR,

Appellant

v.

CPS ENERGY,

Appellee

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-18094

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee’s brief was due July 31, 2017. On August 8, 2017, appellee filed a motion for 

extension of time, requesting an extension until August 23, 2017 to file its brief. In its motion, 

appellee stated its brief was currently due to be filed on August 9, 2017; however, counsel is 

reminded that this is an accelerated appeal, and its brief was due July 31, 2017.1See TEX. R.

APP. P. 38.6(b). 

We GRANT appellee’s request for an extension and ORDER appellee to file its brief on 

or before August 23, 2017. 

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on appellant and appellee. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

 

1 Per order dated May 18, 2017, we advised parties to note that this appeal has been designated an accelerated 

appeal. The clerk’s record reflects that appellant is appealing an order granting CPS Energy’s Rule 91a motion to 

dismiss, which was ultimately based on a plea to the jurisdiction. See Texas Dep't of Crim. Justice v. Simons, 140 

S.W.3d 338, 349 (Tex. 2004), superseded by statute on other grounds, TEX. GOV'T CODE § 311.034 (holding that 

interlocutory appeal may be taken from refusal to dismiss for want of jurisdiction whether jurisdictional argument is 

made by plea to jurisdiction or some other procedural vehicle); City of Austin v. Liberty Mut. Ins., 431 S.W.3d 817, 

822 & n.1 (Tex. App.—Austin 2014, no pet.) (holding that right of interlocutory appeal in Civil Practice and 

Remedies Code section 51.014(a)(8) applied to Rule 91a motion to dismiss that challenged jurisdiction). 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of August, 2017.

___________________________________

Luz Estrada

Chief Deputy Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3890 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 3890

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 8, 2004

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To reauthorize the Steel and Aluminum Energy Conservation and 
                Technology Competitiveness Act of 1988.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 9 of the Steel and 
Aluminum Energy Conservation and Technology Competitiveness Act of 1988 
(15 U.S.C. 5108) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 9. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    ``There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry 
out this Act for fiscal year 2005, an amount equal to the amount 
appropriated for the same purposes for fiscal year 2004, and 
$20,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2006 through 2009.''.
    (b) Steel Project Priorities.--Section 4(c)(1) of the Steel and 
Aluminum Energy Conservation and Technology Competitiveness Act of 1988 
(15 U.S.C. 5103(c)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (H), by striking ``coatings for sheet 
        steels'' and inserting ``sheet and bar steels''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(K) The development of technologies which reduce 
                greenhouse gas emissions.''.
    (c) Conforming Amendments.--The Steel and Aluminum Energy 
Conservation and Technology Competitiveness Act of 1988 is further 
amended--
            (1) by striking section 7 (15 U.S.C. 5106); and
            (2) in section 4(b)--
                    (A) in the subsection heading, by inserting ``and 
                Report'' after ``Management Plan'';
                    (B) by striking ``Within 6 months after the date of 
                enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``Not later than 
                6 months after the date of enactment of the Act 
                enacting this sentence'';
                    (C) by striking ``to expand the steel research and 
                development initiative to include aluminum and''; and
                    (D) by inserting ``, and shall transmit such plan 
                to Congress'' after ``carry out the purposes of this 
                Act''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 7, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### B. S. Campbell and Wife *v.*Evansville, etc., Railroad Co.

Trial — Discontinuance by Plaintiff Does Not Affect Counterclaim.

A defendant is not prejudiced by an order discontinuing the plaintiff’s case as he may proceed to trial on his counterclaim as if no order of discontinuance had been entered.

APPEAL PROM CHRISTIAN CIRCUIT COURT.

November 9, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

In this case the following order was made: “On motion of plaintiff’s attorney it is ordered that this cause be discontinued,” from which appellants who were a part of the defendants in the court below have appealed; insisting that their answer presented a counter-claim and the court below could not, by ordering a discontinuance of the original suit, dismiss their counter-claim.

By *Sec.*401, *Civ. Co.,*it is provided that “in a case where a set-off, or counter-claim has been presented, the defendant shall have the right of proceeding to trial with his claim, although the plaintiff may have dismissed his action or failed to appear.

It is most palpable that if appellants have presented a counterclaim by their pleading, the order referred to did not prevent them from proceeding with it to trial. Nor was it necessary to set aside the order discontinuing the action made on motion of appellees to enable them to proceed with their counter-claim if *189they had presented one. Appellants were not prejudiced by the orders of the court discontinuing the appellee’s suit. Nor in overruling the motion to set aside said order.

*Landes & Clark, for appellant.*

*Feland & Evans, for appellee.*

Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed.*
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Cogent, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul Kim, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. That the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

This certificationhas not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

Date: April 26, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mercari Communications Group, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), Tim F. Holderbaum, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Tim F. HolderbaumTim F. HolderbaumTitle: Chief Financial OfficerDate: January 07, 2011








This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.