alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### FRAZIER v. YARDLEY, Appellant.

In Banc,

March 23, 1904.

Appeal from Sullivan Circuit Court. — No». *E. M. Barber,*Special Judge.

Affirmed.

*Calfee S Eubanks*and *Bigbee $ Mills*for appellant.

*Wattenbarger é Bingham, John W. Clapp*and *Childers Bros.,*for respondent. ■

*19VALLIANT, J.

This is a contested election case for the office of presiding judge of the county court of Sullivan county. It is in its facts exactly like the case, of Montgomery v. Dormer, to he found on page 5 of this volume, the evidence in both cases being practically the same. There was a judgment for the contestant in the circuit court, from which the contestee appealed. :

For the reasons given in Montgomery v. Dormer the judgment in this case is affirmed, and it is ordered that a writ issue out of this'Court directed to the marshal of the court, requiring him to forthwith put the respondent, Estra E. Frazier, in possession of the office of presiding judge of the county court of Sullivan county.

All concur, except *Robinson, G. J.,*who dissents.
IB 

House Calendar No. 191 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3884 

[Report No. 108–557] 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 

at 615 East Houston Street in San Antonio, Texas, as the ‘‘Hipolito 

F. Garcia Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 3, 2004 

Mr. GONZALEZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

JUNE 21, 2004 

Additional sponsors: Mr. SMITH of Texas and Mr. RODRIGUEZ

JUNE 21, 2004 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 615 East Houston Street in San Antonio, Texas, as the ‘‘Hipolito F. Garcia Federal Building 

and United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3884 RH 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The Federal building and United States courthouse 

3 located at 615 East Houston Street in San Antonio, 

4 Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Hipolito F. 

5 Garcia Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal 

9 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec10 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Hipolito 

11 F. Garcia Federal Building and United States Court12 house’’. 

House Calendar No. 191 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3884 

[Report No. 108–557] 

A BILL 

To designate the Federal building and United 

Courthouse’’. F. Garcia Federal Building and United States Street in San Antonio, Texas, as the ‘‘Hipolito States courthouse located at 615 East Houston 

JUNE 21, 2004 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
1

[f you need additional space for ANY section, please attach an additional sheet and lhat section.l

U.S. District Gourt for the Northern District lllinois

Appearance Form for Pro Se Litigants

required for any person filing a case in

Please PRINT leglbly.

Case Number:

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as a pro se litigant:

Name:

Street Address:

City/State/Zip:

Phone Number:

REQUEST TO RECEIVE NOTICE THROUGH E

lf you check the box below and provide an e-mail address in the space provided,

via e-mail, By checking the box and providing an e-mail address, under Federal

5(b)2(E) you are waiving your right to receive a paper copy of documents filed in this case.

You should not provide an e-mail address if you do not check it frequently.

,/! { I request to be sent notices from the court via e-mail. I understand that by m{king this request, I

am waiving the right to receive a paper copy of any electronically filed docunfent in this case. I

understand that if my e-mail address changes I must promptly notiff the Court in writing.

FI ED

JA t 1 20u$M/

as a pro se

willreceive notice

of Civil Procedure

THOM S G. BRUTON

CLERK, U. . DISTRICT COURT

St't

lnformation entered on this form is

party (that is, without an attorney).

court

caserire: d/*t 

v'W

Rev.0612312016

[f you need additional space for ANY section, please attach an additional sheet and referencd that seciion.]

I

i

l

/ - /'4'22

Executed oh (date)

E-Mail Addrees (Please PRINT legibly.)

Case: 1:20-cv-04760 Document #: 54 Filed: 01/14/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:186
Exhibit 32.1

Polypore International, Inc.  Chief Executive Officer Certification  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Polypore International, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Robert B. Toth, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | By: | /s/ROBERT B. TOTHRobert B. Toth President and Chief Executive
Officer
| |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:
March 14, 2008

---



QuickLinks
United States Department of Commerce

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For:

Arkansas

2023

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international system of units (SI), documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully 

completed training and proficiency tests, documented calibration intervals, submitted a quality management system, and 

demonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate.

The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State 

Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope

_____________________________________

Katrice Lippa, Chief

NIST Office of Weights and Measures

(Rev.: September 2021)

Effective Dates: 2023-02-01 to 2024-02-01

Mass Echelon III

25 kg to 1 mg

1000 lb to 0.001 lb

8 oz to 0.03125 oz

Volume Transfer, II

5 gal
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.(a).1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Syneron Medical Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby
certify that to the best of our knowledge:

1.       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 24, 2009

| |  | /s/ Louis Scafuri 
Louis ScafuriChief Executive Officer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 24, 2009

| |  | /s/ Fabian Tenenbaum  
Fabian TenenbaumChief Financial Officer
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 15



August 10, 2000


Koger Equity, Inc.
8880 Freedom Crossing Trail
Jacksonville, Florida  32256


We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Koger Equity, Inc. and subsidiaries for the periods ended June
30, 2000 and 1999, as indicated in our report dated July 25, 2000, because we
did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on such financial
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-55179 of Koger
Equity, Inc. on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-54617 of Koger Equity,
Inc. on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-20975 of Koger Equity, Inc. on
Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-23429 of Koger Equity, Inc. on Form
S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-37919 of Koger Equity, Inc. on Form S-3,
Registration Statement No. 333-33388 of Koger Equity, Inc. on Form S-8 and
Registration Statement No. 333-38712 of Koger Equity, Inc. on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statements prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.






DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Jacksonville, Florida
```
Structured Asset Securities Corporation  Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2004-12H
```

```
Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions to
Certificateholders for 2004
```

```
Class     Interest            Principal Paid Realized     Ending Balance
          Distribution                       Losses
```

```
A1I       4,591,350.71        17,878,344.81  0.00         120,054,655.19
A1II      806,148.70          4,826,109.61   0.00         21,538,890.39
AIOI      142,309.46          0.00           0.00         0.00
APOI      0.00                399,827.94     0.00         3,839,484.06
B1I       48,612.77           9,578.53       0.00         1,383,421.47
B1II      8,403.69            1,753.70       0.00         256,246.30
B2I       40,935.23           8,065.76       0.00         1,164,934.24
B2II      7,100.78            1,481.80       0.00         216,518.20
B3        33,014.36           6,561.80       0.00         949,438.20
B4        18,026.69           3,582.92       0.00         518,417.08
B5        9,013.33            1,791.44       0.00         259,208.56
B6        18,026.99           3,582.24       0.00         518,426.76
R         0.50                100.00         0.00         0.00
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 30, 2013

t0722

Order 

Clerk

July 30, 2013

146859

CITIZENS BANK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 146859

COA: 310195

Roscommon CC: 11-729539-CK

LOUIS E. BOGGS and JENNIFER L. BOGGS,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 19, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit
      13.1




**CERTIFICATIONS
      UNDER SECTION 906**




Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of SuperCom Ltd. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to
      such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
      Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the
      “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
      the
      Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the Company.




Dated: July 24, 2006
              /s/
                  Eyal Tuchman
                Eyal Tuchman
                **Chief
                  Executive Officer**and
                  Principal Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 06/18/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:6960

Case: 1:20-cv-04806 Document #: 297-2 Filed: 06/18/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:6961
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 24, 2009

p0217 

# Order

February 24, 2009

137598

ROBERT QUACKENBUSH, AMY QUACKENBUSH, and KEN QUACKENBUSH, Petitioners-Appellants,

v SC: 137598 COA: 283278 Arenac CC: 07-010212-AV SIMS TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, Respondent-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the July 31, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-28-1998
<CASH>                                         225,228
<SECURITIES>                                    83,576
<RECEIVABLES>                                  674,193
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,999
<INVENTORY>                                    788,519
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,887,558
<PP&E>                                         859,831
<DEPRECIATION>                                 411,792
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,410,568
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          840,834
<BONDS>                                        385,519
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           117
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,181,209
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,410,568
<SALES>                                      5,288,294
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,288,294
<CGS>                                        4,749,988
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,749,988
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               237,063
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,254
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,759
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                298,983
<INCOME-TAX>                                   100,159
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            198,159
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   198,159
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.65
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of NeuroMetrix, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

The
Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: March 7, 2011

/s/ SHAI N. GOZANI, M.D., PH.D. Shai N. Gozani, M.D., Ph.D. Chairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 7, 2011

/s/ THOMAS T. HIGGINS Thomas T. Higgins Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


This
certification is being furnished and not filed, and shall not be incorporated into any document for any purpose, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the Securities Act of
1933.

---



QuickLinks
#### Shirley A. DILTS, Petitioner, United States of America, Intervenor, v. TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION; Director for the Benefits Review Board, of the United States Department of Labor; Eagle Pacific Insurance Company, Respondents.

No. 03-71622.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Sept. 13, 2004.

Decided Dec. 7, 2004.

*534James F. Leggett, Leggett & Kram, Tacoma, Wa, for Petitioner.

Mark S. Flynn, Esq., Department of Labor, Washington, DC, for Intervenor.

Christine N. Kohl, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Office of the Solicitor U.S. Dept, of Labor, Washington, DC, Raymond H. Warns, Jr., Esq., Holmes Weddle *&*Barcott, Seattle, WA, Timothy B. Guilory, Waller & Associates, John Depenbrock, Associate Solicitor, Russell A. Metz, Esq., H. Eugene Davis, Esq., Seattle, WA, for Respondents.

Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, BROWNING, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Shirley Dilts, petitions for review of the decision of the Benefits Review Board, affirming the denial of Dilts’ claim against Todd Pacific Shipyards Corporation and its insurance carriers, (collectively “Todd”), for death benefits under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 901 et seq. Dilts alleged that her husband died of lung cancer that was caused or contributed to by occupational exposure to asbestos in the course of his employment at Todd from 1965 to 1994. The administrative law judge denied Dilts’ claim as barred by her failure to obtain Todd’s approval of third-party settlements she had reached with asbestos manufacturers as required by § 33(g) of the Act, 33 U.S.C. § 933(g).

It is undisputed that Dilts neither notified the employer, nor obtained the approval of the employer for a number of third-party settlement agreements. She now attempts to argue that the statutory requirement of approval, contained in § 33(g), is unconstitutional because it permits an employer wrongfully to withhold approval of settlements, thereby forcing a claimant to obtain the benefits of a settlement at the cost of forfeiting the right to statutory compensation from the employer. Her position is not consistent with the Supreme Court’s holding that the statutory for future provision must be interpreted broadly in accordance with its literal terms. See *Estate of Cowart v. Nicklos Drilling Co.,*505 U.S. 469, 112 S.Ct. 2589, 120 L.Ed.2d 379 (1992).

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                        0
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                           840,056
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                             106,627
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        797,342
<PP&E>                                  235,344
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        1,326,209
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 1,326,209
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  2,350
<OTHER-SE>                           (1,042,660)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          1,326,209
<SALES>                                 881,811
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        881,811
<CGS>                                   349,759
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           349,759
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        447,717
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     (135,919)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (135,919)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            (51,684)
<EPS-BASIC>                             (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.02)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 12.13**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002**

 

I, Andrew Sukawaty, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 20-F of Inmarsat Launch Company Limited (the “Company”); 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.    The Company’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: 

 

(a)    Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.    The Company’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): 

 

(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.