Whether the Peace Corps Director May Certify Peace Corps 

Response Volunteers for Noncompetitive Eligibility for 

Federal Employment Under Executive Order 11103 

Under Executive Order 11103, which describes a “full term of service” as “approximately two years,” 

the Director of the Peace Corps may not issue certificates of satisfactory service to volunteers in the 

Peace Corps Response program (“PCRVs”) who serve between three and twelve months. 

The Director may not issue certificates of satisfactory service to PCRVs under the exception in 

Executive Order 11103 for those who do not complete a full term “due to circumstances beyond 

their control.” 

January 9, 2013 

MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE GENERAL COUNSEL
	

PEACE CORPS
	

In Executive Order 11103, the President authorized the Director of the Peace 

Corps (“Director”) to issue certificates of satisfactory service to returning Peace 

Corps volunteers. These certificates provide volunteers with one year of noncompetitive eligibility for a civil service appointment in the Executive Branch. See 

Exec. Order No. 11103, 3 C.F.R. 173 (1963 Supp.) (“Order”); 5 U.S.C. § 3301 

(2006) (“The President may . . . prescribe . . . regulations for the admission of 

individuals into the civil service . . . .”); id. § 3302 (“The President may prescribe 

rules governing the competitive service.”). The Executive Order provides that only 

those volunteers “who have completed a full term of service (approximately two 

years)” are eligible for these certificates, but also allows the Director to issue 

certificates to volunteers who complete “a lesser period of satisfactory service if, 

in the judgment of the Director . . . their service was of sufficient duration to 

demonstrate their capability to complete satisfactorily a full term, and . . . their 

failure to complete a full term was due to circumstances beyond their control.” 

Order § 3. 

You asked whether the Director may issue certificates of satisfactory service 

not only to traditional Peace Corps volunteers, who serve terms of approximately 

27 months, but also to volunteers in the Peace Corps Response program, a 

program in which volunteers complete shorter terms, typically between three and 

twelve months.1 Specifically, you asked whether Peace Corps Response Volunteers (“PCRVs”) complete the required “full term of service” under the Order by 

1 See Memorandum for Virginia Seitz, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, from 

Bill Rubin, General Counsel, Peace Corps (June 19, 2012) (“Peace Corps Letter”). We also received 

the views of the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”) regarding the issues addressed in this 

opinion. See Memorandum for John E. Bies, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal 

Counsel, from Elaine Kaplan, General Counsel, Office of Personnel Management (Oct. 16, 2012) 

(“OPM Letter”). 

1 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Opinions of the Office of Legal Counsel in Volume 37 

fulfilling a three-to-twelve-month service obligation, notwithstanding the parenthetical in the Order describing a “full term of service” as “approximately two 

years.” Id. If not, you requested that we also consider whether the Director could 

issue certificates to PCRVs based on the Order’s exception for those who do not 

complete a full term “due to circumstances beyond their control.” Id. We conclude 

that, under the terms of the Executive Order, the Director may not issue certificates to PCRVs under either the full term of service requirement or the circumstances beyond their control exception. 

I. 

The Peace Corps Response program began in 1996 as a short-term volunteer 

program for those who had previously served as traditional Peace Corps volunteers. Peace Corps Letter at 2. The Peace Corps has since opened the program to 

qualified individuals with no prior Peace Corps experience, but the other features 

of the program have remained the same. Id. PCRVs complete assignments that are 

more specialized than those given to traditional volunteers. Their assignments 

“can be as short as three months and generally do not exceed 12 months.” Id. at 2. 

Aside from the shorter length of service and specialized work assignments, 

however, both the terms of PCRVs’ service and the benefits they receive are 

comparable to those of traditional volunteers. The only benefit that traditional 

volunteers currently receive that PCRVs do not is the certificate of satisfactory 

service for noncompetitive eligibility issued by the Director under Executive 

Order 11103. 

Executive Order 11103 states that “the head of any agency in the Executive 

Branch may appoint in the competitive service” (and, if the agency has “an 

established merit system in the excepted service,” may appoint in the excepted 

service) “any person who is certified by the Director of the Peace Corps as having 

served satisfactorily as a Volunteer or Volunteer Leader under the Peace Corps 

Act” and who passes whatever examination is prescribed. Order §§ 1, 2. For “a 

period of one year after” certified volunteers complete their service (subject to 

extension under certain conditions), id. § 4, they are eligible to attain employment 

in the Executive Branch “outside of the competitive examining process,” OPM 

Letter at 3. This certification provides recipient volunteers a “significant” advantage in the federal hiring process. Id. 

Section 3 of the Order defines persons whom the Director may certify for a 

noncompetitive appointment: 

Certificates of satisfactory service for the purposes of this Order 

shall be issued only to persons who have completed a full term of 

service (approximately two years) under the Peace Corps Act: Provided, That such certificates may be issued to persons who have 

completed a lesser period of satisfactory service if, in the judgment 

2 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noncompetitive Eligibility for Federal Employment Under Executive Order 11103 

of the Director of the Peace Corps, (1) their service was of sufficient 

duration to demonstrate their capability to complete satisfactorily a 

full term, and (2) their failure to complete a full term was due to circumstances beyond their control. 

Order § 3. 

II. 

The first issue is whether PCRVs qualify for a certificate of satisfactory service 

under the Order because they have completed “full term[s] of service under the 

Peace Corps Act” by virtue of completing their three-to-twelve-month assignments as PCRVs, even though PCRVs’ terms are considerably shorter than the 

approximately 27-month terms served by traditional Peace Corps volunteers.2 

Based on both the text and the context of Executive Order 11103, we conclude 

that the Peace Corps Response program’s three-to-twelve-month term does not 

qualify as a “full term of service” as the Order uses that phrase. 

To begin with, the text of the Order indicates that the President expected that 

volunteers receiving noncompetitive eligibility would have completed terms of 

service more substantial than the three-to-twelve-month assignments PCRVs 

typically receive. The parenthetical immediately following the full term of service 

requirement states that a full term runs “approximately two years.” Order § 3. We 

recognize, as you suggest, that this language could be read as either prescriptive 

(requiring that a full term of service be approximately two years) or descriptive 

(noting that the average term of service for a volunteer at the time of the Order 

was approximately two years). See Peace Corps Letter at 2. But we do not think 

characterizing the parenthetical as descriptive changes the analysis. Even if the 

parenthetical simply describes President Kennedy’s understanding of the length of 

a full term of service when he signed the Order, it nonetheless indicates that the 

President intended to confer noncompetitive eligibility on those Peace Corps 

volunteers who serve approximately two years (or who otherwise qualify through 

the circumstances beyond their control exception). In light of this parenthetical, it 

is unclear that the President would have extended noncompetitive eligibility to 

PCRVs had that short-term program existed in 1963. We believe that a “full term 

2 OPM concluded that PCRVs cannot receive certificates of satisfactory service based in part on its 

view that PCRVs are not “volunteers” as the term is used in the Order. OPM Letter at 2. You 

responded that the Peace Corps considers PCRVs “volunteers” under the Peace Corps Act and noted 

that “the Executive Order . . . [does not] distinguish[] between categories of Volunteers.” E-mail for 

John E. Bies, Office of Legal Counsel, from Jan Miller, Peace Corps, Re: Response to OPM opinion 

(Nov. 26, 2012). Because our analysis does not turn on whether PCRVs are volunteers within the 

meaning of the Order, we need not resolve this definitional issue and assume for purposes of this 

opinion that PCRVs are “volunteers.” 

3 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Opinions of the Office of Legal Counsel in Volume 37 

of service” under the Order is best read to mean approximately two years of 

service. 

The context of the issuance of the Order provides considerable support for this 

interpretation. When President Kennedy signed the Order, he would have understood a full term of service to run approximately two years. Before the Peace 

Corps was established, a report prepared for the President described the proposed 

volunteer program as having a “usual length of service . . . [of] at least one year, 

preferably two, and perhaps in some cases three or more years.” Peace Corps: 

Shriver Report and Recommendations 10 (Feb. 1961) (available at http://www. 

jfklibrary.org (digital identifier JFKPOF-085-014), last visited Sept. 11, 2014). By 

the time the Peace Corps issued its first annual report in July 1962, the idea that 

volunteers would serve a two-year term had become reality. The report explains 

that when Peace Corps was first established, “it was decided” that “[v]olunteers 

would serve for two years, without salary or draft exemption.” See Peace Corps: 

First Annual Report 8 (July 1962) (available at http://www.jfklibrary.org (digital 

identifier JFKPOF-086-003), last visited Sept. 11, 2014). Thus, a two-year term 

was standard by the time President Kennedy signed the Order in April 1963. 

Background documentation about the Order itself also supports our conclusion 

that the President contemplated that a full term of service under the Order would 

be approximately two years. When the Director of the Bureau of the Budget3 

transmitted the proposed Order to the Attorney General for review in March 1963, 

he described the Order as “permit[ting] the Peace Corps to issue certificates of 

satisfactory service only to persons who had completed a full term of 24 months of 

service,” unless the exception for circumstances beyond the volunteer’s control 

applied. Letter for Robert F. Kennedy, Attorney General, from Arthur B. Focke, 

General Counsel, Bureau of the Budget at 2 (Mar. 12, 1963) (emphasis added). 

This reflects an understanding within the Kennedy administration that noncompetitive eligibility depended on two years of service. We believe the Order is best 

interpreted in a manner consistent with its text and these indications of President 

Kennedy’s understanding of the Order at the time he signed it, particularly in light 

of the President’s authority to revise this executive order at any time. See Memorandum for Kenneth A. Lazarus, Associate Counsel to the President, from Antonin 

Scalia, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, Re: Applicability of 

3 C.F.R. Part 100 to the President and Vice President (Dec. 19, 1974) (interpreting an executive order in a manner consistent with public statements President 

Johnson made at the time of the Order); cf. John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United 

States, 552 U.S. 130, 139 (2008) (“[S]tare decisis in respect to statutory interpretation has special force, for Congress remains free to alter what we have done.”) 

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). 

3 The Bureau of the Budget was the predecessor agency of the Office of Management and Budget. 

See Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1970, 35 Fed. Reg. 7959, reprinted in 5 U.S.C. app. 640 (2006). 

4 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noncompetitive Eligibility for Federal Employment Under Executive Order 11103 

Finally, we note that this interpretation of the Order would make its service 

commitment similar to that required in other Executive Branch programs that 

confer noncompetitive eligibility (typically at least a year, if not more). See, e.g., 

5 C.F.R. § 315.607 (2012) (providing that Peace Corps personnel (not volunteers) 

may be eligible for a noncompetitive appointment if they complete “no less than 

36 months of continuous service”); 5 C.F.R. § 315.610 (2012) (providing that 

certain National Guard technicians may be eligible if they have served “at least 3 

years as a technician”); Exec. Order No. 11219, § 1(c), 3 C.F.R. 127, 127 (1965 

Supp.) (providing that present or former career officers or employees of the 

Foreign Service may be eligible upon completing “at least one year of continuous 

service”); 5 C.F.R. § 315.606 (2012) (same); 5 C.F.R. § 315.609(b) (2012) 

(providing that career employees of the Panama Canal Commission may be 

eligible if they “served continuously for at least 1 year”); 5 C.F.R. § 315.608 

(2012) (providing that certain family members of federal employees officially 

assigned to an overseas area may be eligible after their sponsoring federal 

employees complete “52 weeks of creditable overseas service” (except in extraordinary circumstances)). 

To be sure, the President has delegated to the Director broad authority to prescribe the “terms and conditions of the service of volunteers,” see 22 U.S.C. 

§ 2504(a) (2006); see also Exec. Order No. 12137, 3 C.F.R. 389 (1979 Comp.), 

and nothing in the Peace Corps Act or the Order would prevent the Director from 

changing the length of service for both traditional volunteers and PCRVs. Peace 

Corps Letter at 1. We do not think, however, that the Director’s general authority 

to change the length of volunteers’ service also includes the authority to modify a 

presidential understanding, conveyed by the Order, of the length of service that is 

necessary to earn noncompetitive eligibility. 

For these reasons, we conclude that that the Order is best read to permit the 

Director to confer noncompetitive eligibility only on those volunteers that 

complete approximately two years of service or who satisfy the terms of the 

circumstances beyond their control exception. 

III. 

You also asked us to consider whether the Director may certify PCRVs for 

noncompetitive eligibility based on the exception for volunteers who complete “a 

lesser period of satisfactory service,” but who, “in the judgment of the Director of 

the Peace Corps,” (1) have provided “service . . . of sufficient duration to demonstrate their capability to complete satisfactorily a full term,” and (2) have failed to 

complete a full term “due to circumstances beyond their control.” Order § 3. 

In our view, this exception should not be read as a general rule that PCRVs 

who complete their entire assignments receive noncompetitive eligibility. The text 

of the language authorizes the Director to make exceptions in “circumstances 

beyond [the] control” of the volunteer, indicating that this authority is to be used 

5 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Opinions of the Office of Legal Counsel in Volume 37 

on an individualized basis when unanticipated events require volunteers to 

truncate service otherwise expected to last “full terms” of approximately two 

years. That text does not fit the circumstances presented here. By agency design, a 

PCRV’s service lasts between three and twelve months; and a PCRV’s service 

does not terminate prematurely based on circumstances beyond his or her control. 

Moreover, certifying the entire class of PCRVs for noncompetitive eligibility 

under this exception would be inconsistent with agency practice. You have 

informed us that the Peace Corps has long implemented this exception on a caseby-case basis, for example, where a changed political climate makes a volunteer’s 

assigned country unsafe, where a volunteer has been a victim of sexual assault, or 

where some similarly grave, unforeseen circumstance arises. This consistent 

practice comports with the best reading of this exception.4 For these reasons, we 

conclude that the exception does not provide a basis for the Director to confer 

noncompetitive eligibility on PCRVs. 

VIRGINIA A. SEITZ 

Assistant Attorney General 

Office of Legal Counsel 

4 Under the Peace Corps’ established practice, PCRVs also would not satisfy the exception’s first 

requirement—that volunteers complete service of “sufficient duration to demonstrate their capability to 

complete . . . a full term” as the Order uses that phrase (i.e., to be approximately two years). Order § 3. 

Although nothing in the Order limits the Director's discretion to determine what constitutes service of 

“sufficient duration,” you have informed us that the Peace Corps has long used one year of service—the 

upper limit of a Peace Corps Response term—as a benchmark to qualify for the exception. We understand 

that, until two years ago, the Peace Corps required volunteers to serve at least 12 months before they could 

be considered for a certificate under the exception. You explained that Peace Corps will now consider 

volunteers with less than a year of service in certain extraordinary circumstances, but that, as your 

guidelines note, “normally at least twelve consecutive months, including training,” will be required to 

qualify. See MS 285 Volunteer Description of Service and Certificate of Group Health Coverage § 5.3 

(Aug. 26, 2011) (available at http://files.peacecorps.gov/manuals/manual/200_Volunteers/280-289_ 

Volunteer_Transfers_Completions_of_Service_Termination/MS_285/Volunteer_Description_of_Service_ 

and_Certificate_of_Group_Health_Coverage.pdf, last visited Sept. 11, 2014). 

6