alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SI
Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the period covered by this Report.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                                                
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Rheo A. Brouillard                                         
|    |  | Rheo A. Brouillard                                             
|    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                          
|    |  | March 24, 2010                                                 
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Brian J. Hull                                              
|    |  | Brian J. Hull                                                  
|    |  | Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
|    |  | March 24, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3882 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3882

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt from the harbor 
 maintenance tax certain truck cargo on a ferry operating between two 
   ports for the sole purpose of bypassing traffic congestion on the 
 nearest international bridge serving the area in which such ports are 
                                located.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 2004

 Mr. English introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt from the harbor 
 maintenance tax certain truck cargo on a ferry operating between two 
   ports for the sole purpose of bypassing traffic congestion on the 
 nearest international bridge serving the area in which such ports are 
                                located.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN FERRY BORNE TRAILER CARGO FROM HARBOR 
              MAINTENANCE TAX.

    (a) In General.--Section 4462 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to definitions and special rules) is amended by redesignating 
subsection (i) as subsection (j) and by inserting after subsection (h) 
the following new subsection:
    ``(i) Exemption for Certain Ferry Borne Trailer Cargo.--
            ``(1) In general.--The tax imposed by section 4461(a) shall 
        not apply to cargo which is qualified ferry trailer cargo.
            ``(2) Qualified ferry trailer cargo.--For purposes of 
        paragraph (1), the term `qualified ferry trailer cargo' means 
        cargo which is on or in a truck trailer or semitrailer parked 
        on a ferry which is operating between two ports for the sole 
        purpose of transporting such trailers and trucks between such 
        ports due to traffic congestion on the nearest international 
        bridge serving the area in which such ports are located.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to port use after December 31, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Citizens Effingham Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 Exhibit 32.1   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Citizens Effingham Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harry H. Shearouse, President and
Chief Executive Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    To the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
the Company. May 13, 2005/s/ Harry H. ShearouseHarry H. Shearouse
President and Chief Executive Officer
H. Res. 49

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 13, 1997.

Whereas Pamela C. Harriman served her country ably as

United States Ambassador to France from 1993 to early

1997;

Whereas during her tenure as ambassador Pamela Harriman

worked tirelessly to bring closer together as strong allies

and friends the United States and France;

Whereas Pamela Harriman worked throughout her adult life

in the fields of politics and the arts, enriching the lives

of all who knew her and all Americans;

Whereas during the Second World War Pamela Harriman endeavored to solidify relations among Britain, the United

States, and France, contributing her knowledge and her

efforts to making the alliance against Nazism a success;

Whereas as a wife and friend she gave strength and wise

counsel to one of the great United States statesmen of

this century, Governor Averell Harriman; and

Whereas until the very end of her life she was renowned as

a woman of grace, wit, and charm: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Members of the House of Rep2 resentatives—
2

•HRES 49 EH

1 (1) are grateful for the life and service of this

2 great American; and

3 (2) join in conveying their condolences and

4 deepest sympathies to the members of the family of

5 Ambassador Pamela C. Harriman.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 10.1

                                                           Date:  June 11, 2004

                                 ASSIGNMENT

          FOR VALUE RECEIVED, in accordance with the Amended and Restated
Memorandum of Understanding dated as of November 15, 2001 by and between
The Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd. ("Furukawa") and CommScope, Inc.
("CommScope"), as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated as of October 9, 2002
(the "MOU"), CommScope, pursuant to Section 11.2 of the MOU, does hereby
sell, assign, transfer and convey all of CommScope's rights and duties
under the MOU to CommScope Optical Technologies, Inc. ("Assignee"), a
wholly-owned subsidiary of CommScope, as of the date hereof.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Assignment to
be duly executed as of the date first above written.

                                            COMMSCOPE, INC.



                                            By: /s/ Frank B. Wyatt, II
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Name:  Frank B. Wyatt, II
                                                Title: Senior Vice President

Acknowledged and Agreed:

COMMSCOPE OPTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

By: /s/ Frank B. Wyatt, II
    -----------------------------
    Name:  Frank B. Wyatt, II
    Title: Vice President and Secretary
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 03, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, January 03, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24D0178. DAVIS LASTRAPES v. MARCIA P. LASTRAPES. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2022V0977
EXHIBIT 11

Case: 1:19-cv-07915 Document #: 52-11 Filed: 09/09/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:2424 Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 59-13 Filed: 09/09/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:1552
From: Weibell, Tony

To: Scott Drury

Cc: Michael Kanovitz

Subject: RE: T.K. v. ByteDance Technology Co., Ltd.

Date: Wednesday, September 2, 2020 12:20:08 AM

Hi Scott,

It is public knowledge that VPPA claims are covered by the MDL settlement because VPPA claims

have been publicly asserted in the MDL, and the settling parties have publicly said that the

settlement covers all claims asserted in the MDL. I have not discussed or disclosed any confidential

settlement terms to any counsel in the TK litigation. Nor do I intend to until that settlement is public.

Hope that helps.

Tony

From: Scott Drury <drury@loevy.com> 

Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2020 7:09 PM

To: Weibell, Tony <aweibell@wsgr.com>

Cc: Michael Kanovitz <mike@loevy.com>

Subject: T.K. v. ByteDance Technology Co., Ltd.

[External]

Tony:

On August 28, 2020, the Plaintiffs represented in their supplemental filing that “Defendants’ counsel

in this case indicates that the MDL settlement encompasses the Video Privacy Protection Act claims

purportedly at issue in this case.” (Dkt. 49 at 2). It is my understanding that you have not revealed

any details of any contemplated settlement in the TikTok MDL to Plaintiffs’ counsel in the abovereferenced matter. It is my further understanding that you have not indicated, represented or

otherwise stated to Plaintiffs’ counsel that the “MDL settlement encompasses the Video Privacy

Protection Act claims” at issue in the above-referenced matter. Can you please confirm that my

understanding is accurate? I understand that you are not in position to disclose terms of any

settlement, and I am not requesting that information.

--Scott

This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged

material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this

email (or any attachments thereto) by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended

recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any

copies of this email and any attachments thereto.

Case: 1:19-cv-07915 Document #: 52-11 Filed: 09/09/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:2425 Case: 1:20-cv-04699 Document #: 59-13 Filed: 09/09/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:1553
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Mercari Communications Group, Ltd. on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Robert W. Marsik, Chief Executive/Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

|(1) |  | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act  of 1934; and
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/  Robert
W. Marsik
Robert W. Marsik
President
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)

August 23, 2005

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarter and six months ended June 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated
below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

         2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of Registrant.

August 14, 2003                             /s/ Richard J. O'Brien
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Richard J. O'Brien
                                            Chief Financial Officer of
                                            FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated,
                                            as general partner of
                                            FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 488 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 488

  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a two-
  thirds vote on any bill or joint resolution that, pursuant to fast-
         track procedures, would implement any trade agreement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 1998

Mr. Traficant submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a two-
  thirds vote on any bill or joint resolution that, pursuant to fast-
         track procedures, would implement any trade agreement.

    Resolved, That clause 5 of rule XXI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
    ``(e) No bill or joint resolution that implements any trade 
agreement and that is not subject to amendment shall be considered as 
passed or agreed to unless so determined by a vote of not less than 
two-thirds of the Members voting.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3915 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 3915

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 11, 2004

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the 
   Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 
             through April 2, 2004, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAMS 
              UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS ACT AND THE SMALL BUSINESS 
              INVESTMENT ACT OF 1958.

    The authorization for any program, authority, or provision, 
including any pilot program, that was extended through March 15, 2004, 
by section 1(a) of Public Law 108-172 is further extended through April 
2, 2004, under the same terms and conditions.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN FEE AUTHORIZATIONS.

    Section 503(f) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 
U.S.C. 697(f)) is amended by striking ``October 1, 2003'' and inserting 
``May 21, 2004''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 10, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**and**


**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Design Source, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the year ended February 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter A. Reichard,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/
                Peter A. ReichardName:
                Peter A. ReichardTitle:
            Chief
                Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDate:
            June
                30, 2008
#### Board of Trustees of the Fireman’s Pension Fund of the City of Gary *v.*Alfonso D. Holliday, On Behalf of Himself and All Other Retired Firemen of the City of Gary With More Than Twenty-Five (25) Years Service at Retirement and Who Retired Prior to September, 2, 1971.

[No. 3-575A84.

Filed September 18, 1975.

Rehearing denied October 24, 1975;

Transfer denied June 21, 1976.]

*Charles A. Ruckman,*Gary, *for*appellant.

*Jack G. Willard,*Merrillville, for appellee.

*34Staton, P.J.

Holliday filed a class action on behalf of himself and all other retired firemen of the City of Gary with twenty-five (25) or more years service upon retirement, who had retired prior to the effective date of the 1971 Amendment to IC 1971, 19-1-37-14, Ind. Ann. Stat. § 48-6528 (Bums Supp. 1974), seeking the increased pension benefits under the 1971 Amendment. The trial court entered judgment in favor of Holliday, and the Board of Trustees of the Fireman’s Pension Fund of the City of Gary is appealing this judgment. The sole issue on appeal is the same issue presented to this Court in *Schweizer*v. *City of Fort Wayne*(1975), 165 Ind. App. 281, 332 N.E.2d 119:

> Were the firemen who had retired prior to the 1971 Amendment entitled to the additional pension benefits under IC 1971, 19-1-37-14, Ind. Ann. Stat. §48-6528 (Burns Supp. 1974)?

Our opinion in *Schweizer*v. *City of Fort Wayne, supra,*is dispositive of this appeal. In *Schweizer,*we held that firemen, who had retired prior to the 1971 Amendment, were entitled to the additional pension benefits provided under the 1971 Amendment.

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Hoffman, J. and Garrard, J., concur.

Note. — Reported at 333 N.E.2d 794.
April 6, 2007 

Given some of the discussion this week on the (TGDC Sub-committee) teleconferences, particularly the 

one on e-poll books on Tuesday April 3, the below article from today may be relevant. What was missing 

Tuesday was an understanding that both Diebold and ES&S machines do allow a special provisional 

ballot number to be attached to the person's electronic vote record in a DRE if they are voting 

provisionally. That allows the ballot to be pulled out of the system once the eligibility of the voter is 

determined after the election. Not all states use that, and as you can see Ohio yesterday said they were 

not going to, but the functionality is there in at least those two systems. As a result, the ballot activation 

card does have information written to it that may be more than just the ballot style. 

 

 There was some lack of knowledge that was going on in the teleconference on Tuesday that I wanted 

to help clarify, before movement was made in the wrong direction. 

 

 FYI 

 

Kim Brace 

Election Data Services, Inc. 

1400 Eye Street, NW, Suite 400 

Washington, DC 20005 

 

 

Provisional ballots must be on paper

Secretary of state fears electronic machines put voter secrecy at risk in recount

Associated Press

COLUMBUS - Ohio's new elections chief ordered the state's 88 boards of elections Thursday to record all 

provisional ballots on paper, beginning with the first elections after the May 8 primary. 

Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner said electronic machines assign each provisional voter a number that 

is printed on a paper record in each machine, putting ballot secrecy at risk if a recount occurs. If the 

number is visible while votes are being counted, it would be possible to learn the identity of the voter. 

A provisional ballot is cast when a voter does not have suitable identification or if the address on the 

voter's ID differs from the one written in precinct poll books. 

Most counties still use paper for provisional ballots, said Matt Damschroder, director of the Franklin 

County elections board and president of the Ohio Association of Election Officials. Elections officials 

should have no problem making the switch, he said. 

Brunner also ordered boards to adopt statewide standards in voter identification requirements for those 

seeking absentee ballots. 

The changes were in a temporary court order issued by a federal judge in a lawsuit last year over the new 

requirements. The suit contended that standards were being applied unevenly among Ohio's 88 counties. 

The new standards require election workers to accept as valid identification a driver's license or stateissued ID; a photo ID issued by the federal government or a military ID; or an original or copy of a utility 

bill, bank statement, paycheck, government check or other government document.