alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         374,488
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,583,020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     12,181,538
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,688
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,502,852
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,583,020
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                78,643
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               797,224
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             763,396
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,004,553)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,816,102)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.66)


</TABLE>
9625.

#### Parks *v.*The State.

Decided January 15, 1919.

Indictment for possession of liquor; from Forsyth superior court—Judge Morris. March 4, 1918.

*Everett C. Brannon, H. B. Moss,*for plaintiff in error.

*John T. Dorsey, solicitor-general, Herbert Clay, William Butt,*contra.

Broyles, P. J.

1. In a case where it appears that the transcript of the evidence sent to this court is not a correct copy of the brief of evidence approved by the trial judge and of file in the office of the clerk of the court below, this court will order the clerk to send up a correct copy of such record. *Smith*v. *State,*118 *Ga.*83. Where, however, it appears that the brief of evidence sent to this court in the transcript of the record is a correct copy of the brief of evidence approved by the trial judge, and where ’ it further appears *that he has signed the bill of exceptions,*it will be held that he has exhausted his powers with respect to the testimony, and can not subsequently alter the brief of evidence. *Jones*v. *State,*64 *Ga.*698; *Minhinnett*v. *State,*106 *Ga.*141 (32 S. E. 19) ; *Milton*v. *Savannah,*121 *Ga.*89 (48 S. E. 684).

2. Under the foregoing ruling and the facts in this case, the trial judge was without authority to correct the brief of evidence, and this court will not order that the corrected brief of evidence be sent up.

3. It appearing from the brief of evidence in the record transmitted to this court that if any offense was committed by the accused, it was subsequent to the finding of the presentment upon which he was tried, the record shows that his conviction was contrary to law *(Minhinnett*v. *State,*supra),-and the court erred in overruling his motion for a new trial.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.*
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-18-0000137 12-FEB-2019 08:25 AM
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 354 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     February 11, 1998.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and they are hereby, elected 
to the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on the Judiciary: Mr. Rogan of California.
    Committee on National Security: Ms. Granger of Texas.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 99.3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of DDi Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), John Stumpf, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  
|------------------
|Date: May 14, 2003
|                  



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to DDi Corp. and will be retained by DDi Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
9945.

#### Chattanooga Railway & Light Co. *v.*Wallace.

Decided April 16, 1919.

Action for damages; from Walker superior court—Judge Wright. April 25, 1918.

*Glenn & Napier, Henry & Jackson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Rosser & Shaw,*contra.

Luke, J.

1. As to a trespasser on the track of a railroad company it is a general rule that the duty of observing ordinary care and diligence for his protection does not devolve upon the company’s agents in charge of a train, 'until his presence upon the track becomes known to them, but where the circumstances are such that they are bound on a given occasion to anticipate that a person may be upon the track at a certain place, they are under a duty to take such precautions to prevent injury as would satisfy .the requirements of ordinary care and diligence. *Western. & Atlantic R. Co.*v. *Davis,*21 *Ga. App.*461 (94 S. E. 660), and cases cited.

(a). Whether or not the locality, the time, and circumstances of an injury to one using the right of way of the railroad company, and the known habits and frequency of the public in using it, create such a condition as will charge those operating its trains with the special' . duty of looking out for-the presence of a trespasser at the time and place of the injury, is generally a question for the jury to determine. *Pope*v. *Seaboard Air Line Railway,*21 *Ga. App.*251 (94 S. E. 311).

2. The evidence supported the petition, which set forth a good cause of . action, and 'for ho reason assigned did the court err in refusing to grant a nonsuit, or in thereafter entering judgment upon the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.*
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December
      31,
      2007 of the MACROshares Oil Up Tradeable Trust (the "Registrant"), as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"),
      I, John A. Flanagan, principal financial officer of MACRO Securities Depositor,
      LLC, which acts as the depositor for the Registrant (the "Depositor"), certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
                Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and






2.
            The
                information contained in the Annual Report fairly represents, in
                all
                material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
                of the
                Registrant.


Date
        March 28, 2008
 /s/
        John A.
        Flanagan
 John
          A.
          Flanagan
 Chief
          Financial Officer
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel are you 

a Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this &ourt an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this &ourt’s

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 8.6.&§1746, this

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

Jajuan Nile v. City of Chicago, et

al.,

20 CV 2922

Defendants Jones, Leano, Nichols, Bolton, Lewis

Kelly M. Olivier

Hale & Monico LLC

53 W Jackson Blvd., Suite 337

Chicago, IL 60604

6309826 (312) 341-9646

kolivier@halemonico.com

2/5/2021

✔

✔

✔

✔

Kelly M. Olivier

Case: 1:20-cv-02922 Document #: 25 Filed: 02/05/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:77
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel, are you 

a 

 Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this Court’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 U.S.C.§1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on 

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

Kendrick v. City of Chicago et al.

20-CV-03871 Plaintiff Timothy Kendrick Brittany J. Shaw First Defense Legal Aid 5100 W. Harrison St. Chicago, IL 60644 6333347 800-529-7374 brittany@first-defense.org 8/08/2020 ✔

✔

✔

✔

Brittany J. Shaw

Case: 1:20-cv-03871 Document #: 11 Filed: 08/08/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:36
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

DEBORAH LAUFER, Individually,

Plaintiff,

v.

233 E ONTARIO HOTEL PROPCO LLC 

d/b/a IVY HOTEL, a Foreign Limited Liability 

Company,

Defendant.

_______________________________________

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 1:20-cv-04593

Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLAIM

Plaintiff, DEBORAH LAUFER, by and through undersigned counsel, respectfully submits

this Notice of Settlement, and informs the Court as follows:

1. Plaintiff has reached an agreement with Defendant to resolve the claims against 

Defendant.

2. The parties are in the process of finalizing a confidential settlement agreement and 

will be filing a Notice of Dismissal with the Court shortly.

3. Accordingly, the parties ask for a 30-day extension of all deadlines.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served via the Court's 

electronic filing system upon all parties of record this May 26, 2021.

Respectfully submitted,

Attorney for Plaintiff:

By: /s/ Kimberly A. Corkill, Esq.

Kimberly A. Corkill, Of Counsel

Case: 1:20-cv-04593 Document #: 18 Filed: 05/26/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:81
2

Thomas B. Bacon, P.A.

7 N. Coyle Street

Pensacola, FL 32502

ph. 850-375-3475

fx 877-828-4446

kimberlyatlaw@gmail.com

Florida Bar Id. No. 84942

Thomas B. Bacon, Esq.

Thomas B. Bacon, P.A. 

644 North Mc Donald St.

Mt. Dora, FL 32757

ph. (850)375-3475

kimberlyatlaw@gmail.com

Florida Bar. Id. No. 139262

Case: 1:20-cv-04593 Document #: 18 Filed: 05/26/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:82
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leonardo GOMEZ-MORALES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-41665.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Nov. 23, 2004.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*335Mark Michael Dowd, Brownsville, TX, Reynaldo Santos Cantn, Jr., Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Roland E. Dahlin, II, Federal Public Defender, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Leonardo Gomez-Morales appeals his conviction and sentence for violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b) by being found in the United States, without permission, following both his conviction for an aggravated felony and subsequent deportation.

Gomez-Morales argues that the district court erred in considering his prior, uncounseled misdemeanor conviction of aiding and abetting an illegal alien in assessing his criminal history points. He contends that his waiver of the right to counsel in that case was invalid because the district court failed to inform him that an indigent defendant is entitled to court appointed counsel free of charge. Gomez-Morales has not met his burden of showing that the waiver of counsel was invalid. *See Iowa v. Tovar,*541 U.S. 77, 124 S.Ct. 1379, 1390, 158 L.Ed.2d 209 (2004).

Gomez-Morales also contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. He asks us to vacate his conviction and sentence, reform the judgment to reflect a conviction only under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and remand his case for resentencing under that provision. Gomez-Morales acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

*Apprendi*did not overrule *Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,*530 U.S. at 489-90; *United States v. Dabeit,*231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir.2000). This court must follow *Almendarez-Torres*“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” *Dabeit,*231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cm. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's condensed balance sheet as of September 30, 2000, and the related
condensed statements of operations of the nine months ended September 30, 2000
and the notes thereto, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
condensed financial statements and notes.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          93,327
<SECURITIES>                                   117,035
<RECEIVABLES>                                      752
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         51
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               211,881
<PP&E>                                          17,869
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,763
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 230,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,921
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            35
<OTHER-SE>                                     192,868
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   230,224
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,357
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,485)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       225
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,710)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,020)<F1>
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)


<FN>
Includes dividends on preferred stock of $310. </FN>

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 515 Agreed to House (ATH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 515

 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 3, 1998

 Mr. Boehner submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and she is hereby, 
elected to the following standing committee of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on Commerce: Mrs. Heather Wilson.
                                 <all>
```
9817, 9821.

#### McCorkel *v.*First National Bank of Statesboro *et al.;*and *vice versa.*

Bloodworth, J.

1. None of the excerpts from the charge, when considered . in the light of the evidence and the entire ch’arge, are erroneous for any of the reasons assigned.

*464Decided February 18, 1919.

Rehearing denied February 27, 1919.

Complaint; from city court of Statesboro—Judge Proctor. May 13, 1918.

*Johnston & Cone,*for McCorkel.

*Brannen &*Booth, *Anderson & Jones, Dead &*Renfroe, *Hunter &*Jones, contra.

2. The ground of the motion for a new trial which excepts to the failure of the court‘to give certain specific instructions to the jury is without merit. The charge given covered the particular issue, and if more specific instructions were desired thereon, a proper and timely written request therefor should have been made.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

*Judgment affirmed on the main hill of exceptions; cross-hill dismissed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and*Stephens, *J., concur.*
10251.

#### Copeland *v.*The State.

Decided April 22, 1919.

Indictment for murder; from Troup superior court—Judge Terrell. November 18, 1918.

*M. U. Mooty,*for plaintiff in error.

*C. E. Roop,*solicitor-general, contra.

Broyles, P. J.

1. The court did not err in instructing the jury upon the law of voluntary manslaughter or upon the theory of a mutual intent to fight, such instructions being authorized by the evidence.

2. The court having fully instructed the jury upon the law of justifiable homicide, it was not error (especially in the absence of a timely and appropriate written request) to fail to give in charge section 73 of the Penal Code.

3. The evidence and the defendant’s statement authorized the verdict of voluntary manslaughter, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit 32.2

Section 1350 Certifications

**CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Gordon Samson, Chief Financial Officer, Director and principal accounting officer of Cascade Energy  Inc., certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A (the "Report") for the period ended February 28, 2006, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof:
|   | (i)   | fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange |  
 

Act of 1934, as amended, and

 
 

(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial

 

condition and results of operations of Cascade Energy Inc.

 
 

 

 

By:

*/s/ Gordon Samson**CFO* and a member of the Board of Directors(who also performs the function of  principal accounting officer)

June 30, 2006

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cascade Energy Inc., and will be retained by Cascade Energy Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

 

  |
|--------|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|