alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2









Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Management of Protective Life Insurance Company and The Bank of New York, as Indenture Trustee of Protective
Life Secured Trust 2004-29, (collectively the "Management")
and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee of Protective Life Secured Trust 2004-29 (the "Trust"):

We have examined Management's assertion, included in the accompanying "Management Assertion Regarding the Collection and Distribution of Trust Money by The Bank of New York (Indenture Trustee)," that the collection of payments on the funding agreements and distribution of payments to the noteholders has occurred as required by Section 5.02 of the Indenture agreement dated November 7, 2003 between the Trust and the Indenture Trustee during the year ended December 31, 2004.  Management is responsible for the assertion.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting management's assertion and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, Management's assertion referred to above is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria defined in the accompanying "Management Assertion Regarding the Collection and Distribution of Trust Money by The Bank of New York (Indenture Trustee)."



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Birmingham, AlabamaMarch 30, 2005











Management Assertion Regarding the Collection and Distribution of Trust
Money by The Bank of New York (Indenture Trustee)





Management of the Trust asserts that it has collected payments on the funding agreements and distributed payments to the noteholders as required by Section 5.02 of the Indenture agreement dated November 7, 2003 between the Trust and the Indenture Trustee for the year ended December 31, 2004.  This assertion is based on the following criteria:

1. The payments made by Protective Life on the funding agreements that secured the Notes, for the year ended December 31, 2004, are included in Protective Life's Secured Trusts P & I Payments: 1/1/04 through 12/31/04 (P & I Payments report).
2. The payments made by Protective Life on the funding agreements that secured the Notes, for the year ended December 31, 2004, are included in the Indenture Trustee's History of Transactions List.
3. The amounts due on the Notes are reported as a component of the charges from Cede & Co., the nominee of the Depository Trust Company, on the Indenture Trustee's Payment Obligation Report System (PORS Report).
4. Charges from Cede & Co. are included in the Indenture Trustee's screen prints titled The Depository Trust Company Activity History Details, which represent the charge confirmations to Cede & Co., the nominee of the Depository Trust Company.
EXHIBIT
      35.1




ANNUAL
MASTER SERVICER’S CERTIFICATE




GE DEALER
FLOORPLAN MASTER NOTE TRUST




March 26,
2010




The
undersigned, a duly authorized officer of General Electric Capital Corporation
(“GECC”), as
the master servicer (the “Master Servicer”),
pursuant to the Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement dated as of June 30,
2006 (as may be further amended and supplemented from time to time, the “Agreement”), between
GECC and GE Dealer Floorplan Master Note Trust (“Trust”), does hereby
certify that:




1.           GECC
is, as of the date hereof, Master Servicer under the Agreement.




2.           The
undersigned is an authorized officer who is duly authorized pursuant to the
Agreement to execute and deliver this certificate to the Trust.




3.           A
review of the activities of Master Servicer during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009 (the “reporting period”), and of its performance under the
Agreement, has been made under my supervision.




4.           To
the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Master Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout
the reporting period.







IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate the date
first above written.













/s/
Thomas A.
Davidson


Name:
Thomas A. Davidson


Title:  
Authorized Signatory of General Electric Capital Corporation
COURT OF APPEALS FOIl THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER 

### Appellate case name: In re Cecilia Marie Ryan and Attorney Suzanne Schwab-Radcliffe Appellate case number: 01-12-01022-CV 

### Trial court case number: 12FD1843 Trial court: County, Court at Law No 3 of Galveston County On December 14, 2012, relator, Cecelia Ryan, filed what is effectively an agreed motion to stay trial, currently set to begin on December 19, 2012. Relator’s emergency motion is granted. The December 19, 2012 setting for the trial of the underlying case is stayed. The stay is effective until this mandamus proceeding is finally decided. See TEX. R. APp. P. 52.10(b). It ~s so ORDERED. Judge’s signature: /s/Laura C. Higley

[] Acting individually [] Acting for the Court

Date: December 17, 2012
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3917

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 30, 2004

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 695 Marconi Boulevard in Copiague, New 

York, as the ‘‘Maxine S. Postal United States Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3917 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 695 Marconi Boulevard in Copiague, New York, 

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Maxine S. Postal 

5 United States Post Office’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Maxine S. Postal United States Post Office’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 29, 

2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF HAWKER PACIFIC AEROSPACE FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,323,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,133,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   134,000
<INVENTORY>                                 21,227,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,197,000
<PP&E>                                      50,015,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,329,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              82,456,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       30,043,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    21,108,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                82,456,000
<SALES>                                     16,494,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,494,000
<CGS>                                       13,673,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,673,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (28,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             903,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (18,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             32,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

) 20 CR 299

v. )

) Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr.

HARDY LEE BROWNER )

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

Please take notice that the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney 

Jordan Matthews is assigned to this case. 

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. LAUSCH, JR.

United States Attorney

Northern District of Illinois

By: /s/ Jordan Matthews 

JORDAN MATTHEWS

Assistant United States Attorney

219 S. Dearborn St., Rm. 500

Chicago, Illinois 60604

(312) 697-4090

Date: June 19, 2020

Case: 1:20-cr-00299 Document #: 7 Filed: 06/19/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:10
**EXHIBIT 12.12**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002**

 

I, Rick Medlock, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 20-F of Inmarsat Leasing (Two) Limited (the “Company”); 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.    The Company’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: 

 

(a)    Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.    The Company’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): 

 

(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                          $        38
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                         1,228
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          0
<PP&E>                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        1,266
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    66
<BONDS>                               1,200
<COMMON>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          1,266
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          0
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           0
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                              0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.00
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
         REGISTRANT'S UNAUDITED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MAY 31, 2000 AND THE
         UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE
         THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
         TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                          0000835585
<NAME>                         C-Phone Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                   1
<CURRENCY>                     USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              FEB-28-2001
<PERIOD-START>                 MAR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                   MAY-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                          1
<CASH>                          1,978,396
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     413,860
<ALLOWANCES>                      (80,000)
<INVENTORY>                     1,005,807
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                3,398,573
<PP&E>                          1,054,643
<DEPRECIATION>                   (969,914)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  3,483,302
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             464,173
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           89,901
<OTHER-SE>                      2,929,228
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    3,483,302
<SALES>                           379,834
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  381,409
<CGS>                             252,229
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     252,229
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (483,693)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (483,693)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                     (483,693)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.05)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 36 Agreed to House (ATH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 36

 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 1997

 Mr. Fazio of California submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and that they are 
hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on Agriculture: Mr. Johnson of Wisconsin and Mr. Boswell.
    Committee on the Budget: Mrs. Clayton.
    Committee on Government Reform and Oversight: Mr. Davis of 
Illinois, Mr. Tierney, Mr. Turner, and Mr. Allen.
    Committee on House Oversight: Mr. Hoyer and Ms. Kilpatrick.
    Committee on International Relations: Mr. Clement.
    Committee on National Security: Ms. Sanchez, Mr. Maloney of 
Connecticut, and Mr. McIntyre.
    Committee on Resources: Mr. Lampson.
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. LaFalce, Mr. Skelton, Mr. Sisisky, 
Mr. Flake, Mr. Poshard, Mr. Meehan, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. Luther, Mr. 
Baldacci, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, Ms. Millender-McDonald, Mr. Boyd, 
Ms. McCarthy of New York, Mr. Pascrell, and Mr. Goode.
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Evans, Mr. Kennedy of 
Massachusetts, Mr. Filner, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. Baesler, Mr. Bishop, Mr. 
Clyburn, Ms. Brown, Mr. Doyle, Mr. Mascara, Mr. Peterson of Minnesota, 
Mrs. Carson, Mr. Reyes, and Mr. Snyder.
                                 <all>
```
9506.

#### Dunwoody *v.*The State.

Decided November 23, 1918.

(Certiorari granted by the Supreme Court.)

Conviction of manslaughter; from Chattooga superior court—■ Judge Wright. January 19, 1918,

*C. D. Rivers, J. M. Bellah, Maddox & Doyal,*for plaintiff in error. *Claude H. Porter, solicitor-general,*contra.

Bloodworth, J.

1. “The accused was not convicted of murder, but was convicted of manslaughter. Eor this reason the instruction on the subject of malice could' not have been prejudicial to the accused in any of the respects or for any of the reasons pointed out in the assignments of error.” *Simpson*v. *State,*12 *Ga. App.*292 (77 S. E. 105); *Gray*v. *State,*12 *Ga. App.*634 (77 S. E. 916) ; *Land*v. *State,*11 *Ga. App.*761 (2) (76 S. E. 78).

2. The statement of the. accused, in connection with all the evidence in the ease, authorized the charge on voluntary manslaughter. A part of the statement of the accused was: “I was out there in the road looking to be shot or killed any moment, *or hurt in some way,*and that was 'the only way I could stop him and save myself.” “If one kills another under the fears of a reasonable man that the deceased was manifestly intending to commit a personal injury upon him, amounting to a felony, the killing is justifiable homicide; if the prisoner* is .under similar fears of some injury less than a fejony, the offense is manslaughter, and not murder.” *Keener*v. *State,*18 *Ga.*194 (10) (63 Am. D. 269); *Battle*v. *State,*103 *Ga.*53 (4), 58, 59 (29 S. E. 491) ; *Mixon*v. *State,*7 *Ga. App.*805 (4) (68 S. E. 315) ; *Simpson*v. *State,*supra.

3. The excerpt from the charge complained of in the 5th ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial is slightly inaccurate, but, when it is considered in connection with the entire charge and the facts of the case, the error is not so material as to require the grant of a new trial, as the verdict was for voluntary manslaughter only.

4. There was evidence to supptfrt the verdict, and the judgment overruling the motion for new trial must be •

*Affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., concurs. Stephens, J., not presiding.*
#### LIBERTY MUT. INS. CO. v. DITILLO

No. 220A97

Case below: 125 N.C.App. 701

Petition by defendant (Donna T. Stilwell) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rules 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals allowed 5 June 1997. Petition by defendant (Paula C. Burgoon) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting' opinion in the Court of Appeals allowed 5 June 1997. Petition by plaintiffs (Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals allowed 5 June 1997.
10128.

#### Hays *v.*Hays.

Decided May 7, 1919.

Certiorari; from Néwt-on superior court—Judge Smith. September 19, 1918.

*Rogers & Knox,*for plaintiff in error.

*King & Johnson,*contra.

Broyles, P. J.

1. One who complains of the obstruction of an alleged prescriptive private way across the lands of another must show an uninterrupted use of the way for more than seven years, that it was not more than fifteen feet wide, that it is the same fifteen feet originally laid out, and that he has kept it open and in repair. *Nashville, Chattanooga*& *St. Louis Ry.*v. *Coats,*133 *Ga.*820 (66 S. E. 1085), and cases cited.

2. As disclosed by the ordinary’s answer to the writ of certiorari, there was some evidence which authorized his finding that the plaintiff had shown all the essential things enumerated above; and his judgment ordering that the obstructions be removed was not contrary to law or the evidence. It follows that the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur*.