alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7455
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KERMIT LEE DOZIER, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-92-88, CA-96-693) Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 3, 1997 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kermit Lee Dozier, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Dee Griffith, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Dozier , Nos. CR-92-88; CA-96-693 (E.D. Va. Sept. 6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

WHAM-O HOLDING, LTD. and 

INTERSPORT CORP. d/b/a WHAM-O,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE 

“A”,

Defendants.

Civil Action No.: 1:20-cv-04196

Judge Matthew F. Kennelly

Magistrate Judge Maria Valdez

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby files this Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal, without prejudice, as to the following Defendant(s) identified on Schedule A of the 

Complaint:

NO. DEFENDANT

234 WANGYUSHENG

154 NEEDOON-US

DATED: September 7, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt (Bar No. 6207971)

Keith Vogt, Ltd.

111 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1700

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Telephone: 312-675-6079

E-mail: keith@vogtip.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case: 1:20-cv-04196 Document #: 34 Filed: 09/07/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:2322
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document was electronically filed on September 7, 2020 with the Clerk of the Court using the 

CM/ECF system, which will automatically send an email notification of such filing to all registered 

attorneys of record.

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt

Case: 1:20-cv-04196 Document #: 34 Filed: 09/07/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:2323
EXHIBIT
10.30





Independent
Director Compensation





EPL
Intermediate, Inc. pays its independent directors a cash fee of $2,500 per day
for attendance at meetings of the board of directors.  Members of the
audit committee and compensation committee who are independent directors receive
the following fees for attending committee meetings that are held on days other
than days when the board of directors meets: $2,000 per meeting to the
Chairperson; $1,000 per meeting to other members.





In
October 2008, the Board of Directors of CAC adopted a Restricted Stock Plan
pursuant to which up to an aggregate of 5,000 shares of CAC common stock may be
awarded to independent directors as compensation for their
services.  The Company intends to award its independent directors
restricted stock having a value of $27,500 per year commencing
2009.  The restricted stock will vest in equal increments over two
years.  The Restricted Stock Plan is filed as Exhibit 10.11
hereto.
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 17,  2005 |   | /s/                Jean Dagenais                                       |
|-------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          |   | Jean                  DagenaisChief                  Financial Officer |

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.6.3

Eastern Division

Illinois State Rifle Association, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04270

Honorable Mary M. Rowland

Brendan F. Kelly, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, October 3, 2022:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Pursuant to the

Stipulation of Dismissal, this case is dismissed, with each side to bear its own costs. Civil

case terminated. Mailed notice. (dm, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04270 Document #: 125 Filed: 10/03/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:773
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2591

SYLVESTER JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF

COLORED PEOPLE, its Presidents, Chairmen, and

Members of Board of Directors; its St. Louis,

Missouri Branch; and others; CARDINAL RITTER

INSTITUTE CORPORATION, its Chairmen, Presidents and Operating Manager; its St. John Neumann Apartment Building; its Manager, Travis

Harris; Assistant Managers; Samull Brooks;

"Bobby"; Emile, Albert Lenz, Coordinator,

Cardinal Ritter Institute; "Larry" and Ann

Jackson, Secretary; SURBURBAN JOURNALS NEWSPAPERS COMPANY/CORPORATION, St. Louis, Missouri and New York, New York, Editors;

Publishers; Managers; Owners; Keith Batey;

Account Executive Robert M. Jelenic Chairman/

President and C.E.O.; Cynthia K. Williams,

Advertising Manager; Frank O'Connell, Vice

President and others; ST. LOUIS POST DISPATCH

NEWSPAPER COMPANY, its Presidents; Publisher;

Editors; TIM BRYANT, Reporter; VIACOM BROADCASTING CORPORATION; VIACOM BROADCASTING OF

MISSOURI, its "KMOV" TV Channel 4; Managers;

Directors; and others; Anchors; Evening News;

and its reporter; JAMMIE ALLMAN; U.S.

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, its

director, and St. Louis, Missouri Branch

director; KNOWN UNNAMED TENANT, and its Apartment 305 8424 Lucas and Hunt Road-St. Louis

Missouri; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EN BANC

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS; UNITED

STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH

CIRCUIT, EN BANC; CITY OF JENNINGS MISSOURI
2

POLICE DEPARTMENT, its Chief Inspector and six

(6) Police Officers; STATE OF MISSOURI, Department of Mental Health, its Director,

Agent, and all other unknown named state officials; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS

AFFAIRS, Department of Veterans Health; B.J.C.

HEALTH SYSTEM, its Christian N.W. Hospital,

unknown named doctors, nurses, and other

officials,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-99-

2435-AMD)

Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 1, 2000

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sylvester Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Sylvester Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing

this action as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See

Jones v. NAACP, No. CA-99-2435-AMD (D. Md. Nov. 8, 1999). We deny

leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Plaintiff, ) No. 20 CR 299

)

v. ) Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. 

)

HARDY LEE BROWNER, ) Emergency Judge:

Defendant. ) Honorable John Robert Blakey

)

ADDENDUM TO

EMERGENCY MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELEASE

Now comes the Defendant, Hardy Browner, by and through his attorneys, 

and submits this addendum to his Emergency Motion for Temporary Release:

Counsel has conferred with the Government and understands that the 

Government has no objection to Mr. Browner’s Emergency Motion for 

Temporary Release (Dkt. 48), provided the Court fully admonishes the thirdparty custodian as to her obligations.

Dated: March 28, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

 s/ Molly Armour

MOLLY ARMOUR

One of the Attorneys for Hardy Browner

Law Office of Molly Armour

4050 N. Lincoln Avenue

Chicago, IL 60618

(773) 746-4849

armourdefender@gmail.com

Joshua Herman

Attorney at Law

53 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 404

Chicago, IL 60604

(312) 909-0434

jherman@joshhermanlaw.com

Case: 1:20-cr-00299 Document #: 50 Filed: 03/29/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:144
Exhibit 23.1

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-126867) pertaining to the MPC Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan and the MPC Corporation 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, Registration Statement (333-128846) of MPC Corporation on Form S-3, and Registration Statement (No. 333-138529) of MPC Corporation on Amendment No. 4 to Form S-3 of our report dated December 20, 2007 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of MPC Corporation included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2006.

 

 

|   |                                       |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/ Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & HottmanPC |
|   |                                       |
|   |                                       |
|   | Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC    |

 

December 20, 2007

Denver, Colorado
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

SAMUEL UCHENNA ANIUKWU,

 also known as “Uchenna Samuel

 Aniukwu” and “Sammy Maxwell”; 

ANTHONY EMEKA IBEKIE,

 also known as “Emeka Toni Ibe,”

 “Toni Ibe Emeka,” and “Emenike 

Tonero”; and

JENNIFER GOSHA

No. 20 CR 352 

Judge Steven C. Seeger

JOINT STATUS REPORT

The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, through Morris Pasqual, Acting United 

States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, and defendants, SAMUEL 

UCHENNA ANIUKWU, through Michael Rediger, ANTHONY EMEKA IBEKIE, 

through Kent Carlson, and JENNIFER GOSHA, through Patrick Boyle, respectfully 

submit this status report regarding the above-captioned matter:

1. With respect to defendant Aniukwu, on February 14, 2023, Mr. Rediger 

entered his appearance as new counsel. The government subsequently provided 

discovery to Mr. Rediger and the parties have engaged in plea discussions, which 

remain ongoing. The parties anticipate that this matter will be resolved short of trial 

and anticipate being in a position to reach out to the Court’s courtroom deputy in the 

next 30 days to set a change of plea hearing. The parties request that the Court set 

the next status hearing deadline in approximately 30 to 45 days.
2

2. With respect to defendant Gosha, the parties are engaged in ongoing 

plea discussions. The parties anticipate this matter will be resolved short of trial and 

that Gosha’s plea agreement will be a global resolution of this matter and 21 CR 409 

before Judge Chang. The parties need additional time to finalize their plea 

negotiations and request that the Court set the next status hearing deadline in 

approximately 30 to 45 days.

3. With respect to defendant Ibekie, on March 29, 2023, Mr. Carlson 

entered his appearance as new counsel. Mr. Carlson received discovery directly from 

former counsel Paul Camarena. Out of an abundance of caution, the government is 

also re-producing non-media related discovery directly to Mr. Carlson. The parties 

have had several preliminary discussions regarding the matter. Defense counsel has 

informed the government that he needs additional time to review discovery and get 

up to speed on the matter before the parties can engage in further substantive 

discussions. Defense counsel requests that a status hearing date be set in the next 60 

days to give him time to review discovery and determine whether any pretrial 

motions should be filed.

4. The government moves to exclude time until the next status hearing set 

by the Court, in the interests of justice, given the complexity of the case, and to allow 

the parties to continue their plea negotiations. Defendants ANIUKWU, IBEKIE, and 

GOSHA do not object to the exclusion of time.
3

Respectfully submitted,

MORRIS PASQUAL

Acting United States Attorney

By: /s/ Paige A. Nutini

SAURISH APPLEBY-BHATTACHARJEE

PAIGE A. NUTINI

Assistant U.S. Attorneys

219 South Dearborn St., Rm. 500

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Dated: April 14, 2023 (312) 697-4071
Technology Transfer at NIST

Paul Zielinski

Director, Technology Partnerships Office
Technology Transfer

NIST Collaborations 

• CRADAs

• User Facilities – Research Participants 

• Postdoctoral Researchers 

• Guest Researchers 

• Start-ups and Young Companies 

• Calibration

• Accreditation Services 

• Small Business Innovation Research 

Conferences, Workshops, and Inquiries 

• Competitions

The overall process by which NIST knowledge, facilities, or capabilities in 

measurement science, standards and technology promote U.S. innovation and industrial 

competitiveness in order to enhance economic security and improve quality of life.

NIST Technology and Work Products

 Participation in Documentary Standards 

Committees 

 Standard Reference Data

 Standard Reference Materials 

 Patents and Licensing

 Software and Other Downloadable 

Products 

 Technical Publications 
10/11/2018 3

Technology Transfer Policy Committee

• Reduced paperwork 

requirements

• Delegations to 

Division level 

• Service Now

Collaborations

• Removed formal 

presentation

• Service Now

Disclosures

• Topics on NIST 

priorities

• Increased Phase 2

SBIR
1.

2.

3.

4.

Intellectual Property

Disclosures up for 2018 

Patents issued increasing trend

Several licenses expired in 2018

New licenses down somewhat 0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Disclosures Patents Issued Licenses New Licenses Active
1.

2.

3.

4.

Collaborations

Active CRADAs still increasing to 

all time highs

New CRADAs trending up and 

increasing in scope

Amendments increasing –

relationships continuing

Material transfer becoming more 

important

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

New CRADA Active CRADA Amended CRADA MTA
Future Direction

NIST on a Chip Program Pilot

Increase focus on NIST strategic 

priorities

Increase customer service and 

program integration

Move to a more 

strategic approach to 

partnership and 

commercialization
QUESTIONS?
COMMON DATA FORMAT 

IN 

ELECTION RESULTS REPORTING

Paul E. Stenbjorn
Background and Need

 Request of District of Columbia officials to provide 

Washington Post technology staff guidance on 

developing an election results platform for 2012 

election.

 Opportunity for this Consortium to address this 

request and other common practice opportunities 

among states.

 Existing data standards identified for elections, 

notably EML
2011 Proof of Concept

 In 2011 April special election, DC BOEE produced 

XML feed to provide data to media outlets using a 

schema developed in-house

 DC BOEE produced election XSLT to produce 

formatted election results reports

 Used XML to generate Google Gadget
2011 Example

XSLT

XML

Google Gadget
Plan for 2012

 Adopt a common framework based on EML 

510/520/530

 Develop a common set of XSL transformations for 

media use

 Deploy results via Google Gadget for cloud-based 

consumption

 Development of XSLT for data conversion from vote 

tabulation systems
EML 510/520/530

 EML 510 contains contest information, reporting 

units and results, including:

 Precincts reported

 Candidate names

 Voting precincts

 EML 520 contains election results data

 EML 530 contains jurisdiction statistics, including: 

 Turnout statistics

 Reporting times
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0"

xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"><xsl:template match="/">

 <html> <body>- Election Results <xsl:for-each select="//Election/Contest“>

 <h2><xsl:value-of select="ElectionIdentifier/@Id"/></h2>

 <h2><xsl:value-of select="ContestIdentifier/@Id"/></h2>

 <table border="0" width="100%“> <tr bgcolor="#9acd32">

 <th align="left" width="40%">Candidate</th>

 <th align="left" width="40%">Affilation</th>

 <th align="left" width="20%">Votes</th> </tr> <xsl:for-each select="Selection“> <xsl:if test="CandidateIdentifier/CandidateName != 'NONE'">

 <tr> <td align="left" width="40%"><xsl:value-of select="CandidateIdentifier/CandidateName" /></td>

 <td align="left" width="40%"><xsl:value-of select="Affiliation/AffiliationIdentifier/RegisteredName" /></td>

 <xsl:if test="Votes > 0">

 <td align="left" width="20%"><xsl:value-of select="Votes" /></td>

 </xsl:if>

 <xsl:if test="Votes < 1">

 <td align="left" width="20%"></td>

 </xsl:if>

 </tr>

 </xsl:if>

 </xsl:for-each>

 </table>

 <hr/>

 </xsl:for-each>

</body>

 </html>

</xsl:template></xsl:stylesheet>

EML 520 XSL Example
Deployment Plan

 States will develop independent plans for 

deployment using EML Schema documentation

 States will host XML files locally on state resources

 Consortium will coordinate with media outlets for 

publication of results
Future Direction

Group will coordinate efforts with:

 NIST and IEEE

 Offer other states the opportunity to benefit from 

results

 Allow development of election results reporting in 

the public domain
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



I, J. William
Blackham, certify that:



1. I have reviewed
this annual report on Form 10-K of Eagle Hospitality Properties Trust, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:



(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of
the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this report any change in
the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



5. The
Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the Audit Committee of Registrants Board of Directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



(b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 28, 2005



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/S/    J. WILLIAM
BLACKHAM           
|J. William Blackham                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer
Agenda 

Topic: Proposed Updates to the

Mobile ID Device Best Practice Recommendations

 

 

Date: October 30, 2014

9:30 Welcome and Orientation: 

Barbara Guttman

 Director, Information Access Division, NIST

 Shahram Orandi

 Group Leader, Image Group, NIST

9:45: Project Overview

 Brad Wing, NIST

Use Case Presentations 

10:15 Forensics / Latent Print Photography

 Mobile Time/Attendance and Certifications

 Tactical Awareness and Biometrics Build

 Other DHS S&T Use Cases

Patty Wolfhope, DHS S&T

 Scenarios Developed in DHS Mobile ID Workshops

 Rick Lazarick, contractor to DHS

10:45 Voice 

 Mobile Voice Applications

 Patrick Gibbs, contractor to DoD

11:00 DNA

 FBI CODIS and RapidDNA

 Kevin Ellis, FBI

11:15 Iris

 Border Patrol Use of Iris in a Mobile Environment

 Paul Good, DHS Border Patrol

11:30 WSABI Mobile Device Usability

 Kristen Greene, NIST

11:45 FBI Mobile ID Scenarios 

 Peter Alex, FBI

12:00 – 12:45 (Lunch) 

Standards and Reference Materials

12:45 ANSI/NIST-ITL 
 Brad Wing, NIST 

 

1:00 Mobile ID Taxonomy

 Eric Kukula, Noblis

1:00 ISO/IEC SC37 Pictogram Standards 

 Mary Theofanos, NIST

1:15 OASIS Biometrics Technical Committee Standards

 Kevin Mangold & Ross Micheals, NIST

1:30 Break 

Other issues

1:45 Glasses and the Impact on Facial Recognition

 Delia McGarry, Noblis

 

 

 

 

 

2:00 FAP 10 and FAP 30 comparison

 David Jones, FBI

2:15 Proposed FAP 55 for 3.2 x 2 capture area

 Tom Buss, Integrated Biometrics

2:30 Wearable Biometrics (Google Glasses, Police Officer Video, etc.) and other 

innovative technologies 

 Brad Wing, NIST

2:45 Iris Acquisition Guidance

 Jim Cambier, Crossmatch

Group Discussion

3:00 Moderated by Brad Wing

 Objectives: 

 Agree Upon General Format of the Document

 Develop an Initial Timeframe

 Define Working Groups

 Select Working Group Leads

5:00 Adjourn