alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SI'l\

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

John Doe and Jane Doe, individually,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

Board of Education For

Beecher School District #20OU;

Beecher School District #200U

And James Vidmar,

Defendants

FILED

JUt{ 3ozrlu cl

cLd,[tKBgf#glgB,*,

Civil Action No. 20 CV 3794

Statrc of Case Report

As of June 25,?:OZL, the criminal case in Will County is still pending against me. I am asking for more

time to obtain legal representation. I thought the school district attorney was representing me, but she

says she is not. I am trying to find out why not.

State of lllinois)

County of Will SS

The undersigned, a notary public in and for said county, in the state aforesaid, DO HEREBY CERTIFY, that

James Vidmar, personally known to me to be the same person whose name is subscribed to this

instrument, appeared before me this day in person and acknowledged that he signed, and delivered this

instrument as his free and voluntary act for the purposes therein set forth.

Given under my hand and notarial this *, day of 7tn(

Mycommissionexpires ly1s,1lffiffir; ftt ilr', -,fl Its'#,S|S;:nnf,,$B,'

2021 d

Case: 1:20-cv-03794 Document #: 19 Filed: 06/30/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:94
Case: 1:20-cr-00352 Document #: 70 Filed: 10/30/20 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:624
Case: 1:20-cr-00352 Document #: 70 Filed: 10/30/20 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:625
Case: 1:20-cr-00352 Document #: 70 Filed: 10/30/20 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:626
Case: 1:20-cr-00352 Document #: 70 Filed: 10/30/20 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:627
Case: 1:20-cr-00352 Document #: 70 Filed: 10/30/20 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:628
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,676,025
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             4,310,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,461,708
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     24,544,806
<ALLOWANCE>                                    363,425
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,843,241
<DEPOSITS>                                  29,322,989
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            173,911
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       512,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,834,341
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              33,843,241
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                943,520
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               31,407
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                86,474
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,061,401
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             467,381
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          594,020
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  170,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                629,571
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                129,524
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     129,524
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   129,524
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     3.9
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               195,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,575
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              363,425
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           363,425
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
H. Res. 604

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 20, 1998.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (S. 1132) to modify the

boundaries of the Bandelier National Monument to include

the lands within the headwaters of the Upper Alamo Watershed which drain into the Monument and which are not currently within the jurisdiction of a Federal land management

agency, to authorize purchase or donation of those lands, and

for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as read for

amendment. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening motion

except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill equally divided and

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

the Committee on Resources; and (2) one motion to recommit.

SEC. 2. Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be

in order without intervention of any point of order to consider

in the House the bill (S. 2133) an act to preserve the cultural
2

•HRES 604 EH

resources of the Route 66 corridor and to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to provide assistance. The bill shall be

considered as read for amendment. The previous question

shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage

without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on

the bill equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on Resources;

and (2) one motion to recommit.

Attest:

Clerk.
From: Hadley, Emily 

Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2022 9:45:42 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)

To: aiframework <aiframework@nist.gov>

Subject: Comments on AI RMF

Hello,

Thank you for the opportunity to review the AI RMF resources. I think the report and accompanying 

playbook are both important and valuable tools that I can see being useful in both industry and 

education contexts. A few comments:

From the report on page 2, this sentence: “AI systems are not inherently bad or risky, and it is often the 

contextual environment that determines whether or not negative impact will occur.”

• Comment: I would argue that there are numerous examples of AI systems that are inherently 

bad or risky, especially those developed on biased datasets. Facial recognition is a prime example 

of this – changing the context in which a biased facial recognition system is used does not 

change the fact that it itself is biased. Or if an autonomous vehicle’s recognition algorithm can’t 

recognize children, that is inherently risky no matter the context in which it is deployed. The AI 

system itself is bad, not just the use of it. I would also say that the view of AI systems as “not 

inherently bad or risky” is a pro-tech perspective which does not acknowledge a non-tech view 

that AI can in fact be bad or risky.

For the playbook tool:

• I like the idea of the tool, but honestly, it’s not entirely clear to me how I’m supposed to use it. It 

seems like a more complicated way to provide details that would be more readable in a report 

(like the GAO accountability framework). To justify an interactive site, I think there should be 

more interactivity like a search feature or checklist or substantially more details/images/figures 

than what would be permitted for a report. Or perhaps emphasize that it will be a living site 

updated with new resources

• There is a lot of information on the site that can feel overwhelming to companies that are new 

to this space. It would be nice to have a case study, interview, or walk through which illustrates 

how a smaller or new company to AI risk management could use this. 

• I appreciate that this is a draft website but was also curious if accessibility or user design testing 

had been completed. For example:

o The font upon opening the accordions is really small and smushed together.

o There appears to be least 3 different font styles used and they feel like they clash

o Using the ANDI tool, it looks like there are some accessibility concerns in the playbook 

for color contrast and button accessibility. 

• It would be helpful to define AI actors on the Terms page (similar to how it is defined in the 

report)

Best,

Emily

Emily Hadley (she/her)

Research Data Scientist

RTI International
Agenda

MEP Advisory Board

Monday, June 24, 2013

Hyatt Regency Denver Tech

7800 East Tufts Avenue

Denver, CO

8:30 Meeting Logistics

 Karen Lellock, NIST MEP

8:40 Welcome, Introductions, and Opening Remarks 

 Denny Dotson, Chair; Vickie Wessel, Vice Chair

9:40 Audience Introductions 

10:00 Role of Federal Advisory Board

 Henry Wixon, Chief Counsel, NIST

 Alan Taub, Chair, NIST Visiting Committee on Advanced Technology (Presentation)

10:30 Break

10:45 Memo from NIST Director Patrick Gallagher to MEP Advisory Board (Presentation)

 Phillip Singerman, Acting Director, NIST MEP

11:15	 Briefing and Update on GAO Report on Cost Share (Presentation)

11:30 	 Budget Briefing (Presentation)

 

12:00 Lunch

1:00 Audience Introductions

1:15	 Strategic Competitions Update (Presentation)

 

 Multi-agency Initiatives (AMJIAC, Make it in America)

 Mark Troppe, NIST MEP

 

MEP Specific (Competitive Awards, 

 Alex Folk, NIST MEP

2:15 MEP Strategic Planning Process (Presentation) and Collaboratory (Presentation)

 Gary Yakimov, NIST MEP

3:00 Break

3:15 Public Comments

3:30 Board Discussion

 Denny Dotson, Vickie Wessel

 Subcommittees

 Schedule

 Other Items

5:00 Adjournment
#### *A.*A. Goodson *v.*Samuel Stephens.

Election of Remedies — Plaintiff Must Stand by his Selection.

The plaintiff, having deliberately elected to proceed upon the second paragraph of his petition, it was not an abuse of the court’s discretion to refuse to permit him, after the testimony was heard, to amend-his pleading and rely upon the matters set out in the first paragraph of his original petition.

APPEAL PROM ANDERSON CIRCUIT COURT.

October 20, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The court below did not err in requiring the appellant to elect which one of the causes of action set out in his petition he would prosecute. The two were not only inconsistent, but each one presented a perfect defense to the other and might have been plead in bar of a recovery.

Having deliberately elected to proceed upon the second paragraph, knowing, as he must have known, that a former judgment between the same parties, rendered in an action involving *665identically the same subject-matter, could be plead as a bar to his suit, and being fully apprised as to the proof he would be able to make by his witness McBrayer, who had testified in the former suit, it was not an abuse of the court’s discretion to refuse to permit him, after the testimony was heard, to amend his pleading, and rely upon the matters set out in the first paragraph of his original petition.

*Felix & Thompson, for appellant.*

-■, *for appellee.*

Judgment affirmed.
#### Wernwag and Others *v.*Mothershead and Another, in Error.

DEBT on'a promissory note given by the plaintiffs in error to the defendants in error as follows: — “$432. Eight weeks from date, we will pay *Mothershead*and *Foster*four hundred and thirty-two dollars, and, if not paid when due, we will pay five dollars interest per week until paid. *December*11th, 1832.”

*402The declaration described the note correctly and concluded as follows: — “And although the said sum of money specified in the said note hath, according to the tenor and effect thereof, lone since been due and payable, nevertheless, the said de- ° A *J ' **fendants, though often requested, &c. have not paid the same or any part thereof to the plaintiffs, but have hitherto wholly neglected and refused to pay the same. Wherefore, &c. Damage 300 dollars.”

*Held,*on demurrer, that the assignment of the breach in the declaration, was sufficient to authorise a recovery not only of the principal debt, but also of the interest due on the note; a special averment of the non-payment of the interest, not being essential to a recovery of the interest.

*Held,*also, that the promissory note in question, on default of payment when due, drew interest at the rate specified in the note from the time it became due, and not from the date of the note (1).

(1)

 Vide *Tyler et al.*v. *Denson,*ante, p. 347, and note (2).
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kaitlyn Adams","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kaitlyn-e-adamsnasa-gov\/","title":"Lunar Surface Exploration","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6RCxfyxZvf\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/lunar-surface-exploration\/\">Lunar Surface Exploration<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/lunar-surface-exploration\/embed\/#?secret=6RCxfyxZvf\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Lunar Surface Exploration” — NASA\" data-secret=\"6RCxfyxZvf\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/ngs-lunar-surface-cover.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
No. 87-1512.

#### Dority *v.*Oregon.

Ct. App. Ore. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of CompX  International  Inc.  (the
Company)  on Form 10-Q for the  period  ending  June 30,  2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David A.
Bowers, Vice Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.




/s/David A. Bowers
   --------------------------
   David A. Bowers
   Vice Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer


July 27, 2004






Note: The certification  the registrant  furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed
"filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  as
amended,  or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  Registration
Statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference,  except as otherwise  expressly
stated in such filing.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hill International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Irvin E. Richter, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                                                      
|----- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|By:   |  | /s/    IRVIN E.
RICHTER                              
|      |  | Irvin E. Richter Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|      | 
|Date: |  | March 24,2008
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

CamelBak Products, LLC

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.:

1:20−cv−03947

Honorable Thomas M.

Durkin

The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations

Identified on Schedule "A"

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, August 5, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Plaintiff's Motion for

Entry of a Preliminary Injunction [19] is granted. Enter Preliminary Injunction Order.

Plaintiff's oral motion to unseal Temporary Restraining Order [13] is granted. The Clerk's

office is directed to unseal the Temporary Restraining Order [13]. Plaintiff's counsel is

ordered to add ALL Defendant names listed in Schedule A to the docket within three

business days. Instructions can be found on the court's

websitewww.ilnd.uscourts.com/instructions. Mailed notice(sxw, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03947 Document #: 23 Filed: 08/05/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:4235
CFTC Ex. 121

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 76-5 Filed: 11/04/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:616
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 76-5 Filed: 11/04/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:617
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 76-5 Filed: 11/04/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:618
EXHIBIT 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bay State Bancorp Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John F. Murphy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.


                                                 \s\John F. Murphy
                                                 ----------------------------
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 November 12, 2002


                                    Page 26
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bay State Bancorp Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I
Michael O. Gilles, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      3.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      4.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.


                                                \s\Michael O. Gilles
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                November 12, 2002


                                    Page 27
ALASKA 

Chapter 45.75. WEIGHTS AND MEASURES ACT 

Article 01. STANDARD WEIGHTS AND MEASURES 

Sec. 45.75.210. Declarations of unit price on random packages. 

In addition to the declarations required by AS 45.75.200 , a commodity in package form, which is one of a 

lot containing random weights, measures, or counts of the same commodity and bearing the total selling 

price of the package, shall bear on the outside of the package a plain and conspicuous declaration of the 

price per single unit of weight, measure, or count. 

Sec. 45.75.230. Misrepresentation of price. 

When a commodity or service is sold, or is offered, exposed, or advertised for sale, by weight, measure, or 

count, the price may not be misrepresented, and the price may not be represented in a manner calculated or 

tending to mislead or deceive an actual or prospective purchaser. When an advertised, posted, or labeled 

price per unit of weight, measure, or count includes a fraction of a cent, all elements of the fraction shall be 

prominently displayed and the numeral expressing the fraction shall be immediately adjacent to, of the 

same general design and style as, and at least one-half the height and width of the numerals representing the 

whole cents.