alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Mike Indovina

NIST
Michael Indovina IAD - Image Group

Overview

Introduction to Latent Finge

 Latent AFIS Problems/Cha ELFT Project Impact and S
Michael Indovina IAD - Image Group

“Conventional Fingepr

Rolls (L)

Rolls (R)

Flats 

(L,Tbs,R)
Michael Indovina IAD - Image Group

What are Latents?

 Ubiquitous (found on almost all  Residual marks from fingers & 

... but from Very High Value S Arbitrarily poor quality

 Also toe and footprints (all fricti

Latents Fingerprints (aka 
Michael Indovina IAD - Image Group
Michael Indovina IAD - Image Group

Right thumb (rolled - ink) Right thumb (flat - ink)

“Conventional” Fingerprints
Michael Indovina IAD - Image Group

Automated Latent ID Pro

 It’s not very automated...
Michael Indovina IAD - Image Group

How Latent Identification w

Rank 

1 

2 

3 

...

20 

Output

Create markup Feature markup set

Input

Input

Examine

Latent Examiner

Automated Latent 

Fingerprint Identification 

System 

AFIS

Latent print
Michael Indovina IAD - Image Group
Michael Indovina IAD - Image Group
Michael Indovina IAD - Image Group

How Latent Identification w

Rank Subject Score

1 0731 2903

2 1303 1805

3 3950 1754

...

20 0121 350

Candidate List

Latent Examiner

Latent fingerp

Image query
Michael Indovina IAD - Image Group

Automated Latent ID Pro

 It’s not very automated... It’s relatively inaccurate
Michael Indovina IAD - Image Group

37
Michael Indovina IAD - Image Group

Automated Latent ID Pro

 It’s not very automated... It’s relatively inaccurate It’s generally non-interoperable
Michael Indovina IAD - Image Group

AFIS Interoperability: 
Michael Indovina IAD - Image Group

AFIS Interoperability: F
I. The world’s only open technolog

series focused on automated latefingerprint identification systems 

II. An interactive effort between NIS

latent fingerprint software commuimprove accuracy and interoperareduce reliance on human exam

What is ELFT ?
Michael Indovina IAD - Image Group

ELFT Impacts

 Closing performance gap with conven “Lights out” latent matchers and laten

 Standardized interoperable latent featu

o Quickly launch more searches (redo Examiners free to focus on “difficuo Level-of-effort directed manual proo Enabling Mobile Biometric applicao Increased use of cross-jurisdictiono De-coupling of latent workstation 
Michael Indovina IAD - Image Group

Stakeholders

 Latent AFIS technology Users 

o “Which system is best for my ao “How to optimize performance 

 Latent AFIS technology Develo

o “Which algorithms work best?”o “Where to focus my developme

 General Public:

o “Keep criminals & terrorists off 
For More Information

Web 

 http://fingerprint.nist.g

Email 

 latent@nist.gov

Michael Indovina IAD - Image Group
Exhibit 31.4





CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, D. Kirk McAllaster, Jr., certify that:





|   |                                                                                             
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Cole Credit Property Trust, Inc.; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.







Date:April 30, 2014/s/ D. KIRK MCALLASTER, JR.Name:D. Kirk McAllaster, Jr.Title:Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of United PanAm Financial Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      James Vagim, certify in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer and President
      of
      the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(a)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




(b)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto signed this Certification as
      of
      November 10, 2008.




/s/    JAMESVAGIM**James
                Vagim****Chief
                Executive Officer and
                President**
Year Ended December 31,2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005Calculation of Earnings:Add:Income from continuing operations before minority interests and
income/loss from unconsolidated joint ventures
    
    $
    62,580
    
    
    $
    66,974
    
    
    $
    74,231
    
    
    $
    35,018
    
    
    $
    17,877Amortization of interest capitalized
    
    
    3,009
    
    
    
    1,307
    
    
    
    59
    
    
    
    43
    
    
    
    20Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures
    
    
    586
    
    
    
    687
    
    
    
    357
    
    
    
    130
    
    
    
    106Fixed charges (see below)
    
    
    77,403
    
    
    
    80,854
    
    
    
    84,353
    
    
    
    48,286
    
    
    
    23,934Subtract:Interest capitalized
    
    
    (12,405
    )
    
    
    (41,242
    )
    
    
    (56,699
    )
    
    
    (7,614
    )
    
    
    (708
    )Total earnings before fixed charges
    
    
    131,173
    
    
    
    108,580
    
    
    
    102,301
    
    
    
    75,863
    
    
    
    41,229Fixed charges:Interest expensed
    
    
    64,998
    
    
    
    39,612
    
    
    
    27,654
    
    
    
    40,672
    
    
    
    23,226Interest capitalized
    
    
    12,405
    
    
    
    41,242
    
    
    
    56,699
    
    
    
    7,614
    
    
    
    708Total fixed charges
    
    
    77,403
    
    
    
    80,854
    
    
    
    84,353
    
    
    
    48,286
    
    
    
    23,934Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    1.7
    
    
    
    1.3
    
    
    
    1.2
    
    
    
    1.6
    
    
    
    1.7Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends
    
    
    1.4
    
    
    
    1.1
    
    
    
    1.0
    
    
    
    1.6
    
    
    
    1.7Preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    16,963
    
    
    $
    16,963
    
    
    $
    16,868
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**









The
      Board
      of Directors Macquarie
      Infrastructure Company LLC:





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
      333-125226) on Form S-8 and the registration statement (No. 333-138010) on
      Form
      S-3 **** of
      Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust of our report dated February 28, 2007,
      with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Macquarie Infrastructure
      Company Trust as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated
      statements of operations, stockholders’ equity
      and
      comprehensive income, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2006
      and
      2005 and the period April 13, 2004 (inception) to December 31, 2004, and the
      related financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the
      effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting as of December
      31,
      2006 and the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting as
      of
      December 31, 2006, and our report dated March 22, 2005, with respect to the
      consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and
      comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows of North America Capital Holding
      Company for the periods January 1, 2004 through July 29, 2004 and July 30,
      2004
      through December 22, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006
      annual report on Form 10-K of Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust.




KPMG LLPDallas,
              TexasFebruary 28,2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

JOINT STATUS REPORT

Per the court’s September 7, 2022 minute entry (Dkt. 46), the parties in this Freedom of 

Information Act case jointly submit this status report.

1. Since the parties’ August 29 status report (Dkt. 44), ICE has issued two additional 

productions, bringing the total number of productions to 22.

2. The court has ordered ICE to increase its processing rate to 700 pages per month 

beginning with ICE’s November production.

JACQUELINE STEVENS,

Plaintiff,

v.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY, IMMIGRATION AND 

CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 20 C 2725

Judge Rowland

Case: 1:20-cv-02725 Document #: 47 Filed: 10/12/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:315
2

3. The parties suggest that they file another status report on January 31, 2022, at which 

point the parties should have a realistic sense of when the production will be complete.

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. LAUSCH, Jr.

United States Attorney

By: s/ Alex Hartzler 

ALEX HARTZLER

Assistant United States Attorney

219 South Dearborn Street

Chicago, Illinois 60604

(312) 886-1390

alex.hartzler@usdoj.gov

s/ Nicolette Glazer

NICOLETTE GLAZER

Attorney for Plaintiff

Law Office of Larry R. Glazer

Watt Plaza

1875 Century Park East #700

Century City, California 90067

(708) 435-0404

nicolette@glazerandglazer.com

Case: 1:20-cv-02725 Document #: 47 Filed: 10/12/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:316
Requirements Overvie

& Analysis Project

Next Generation Integrated Auto

Fingerprint Identification Syst

(NGI)

Criminal Justice Information Services D

Federal Bureau of Investigation
Purpose

• This Requirements Overview & Analysis 

direction of The Criminal Justice Informa(CJIS) Division of the Federal Bureau of (FBI) in Clarksburg, West Virginia. 

• IntelliDyne-LLC from Arlington, Virginia, 

CJIS to review, analyze, validate and reitems that are needed (referred to as the “Requirements”) for the Next Generation 
CJIS Boards/Committ

Through the direction of the CJIS Adviso(APB) Executive Committee and with rethe Compact Council, the IAFIS InterfacTask Force (IIETF) has been tasked witNGI user requirements collected to dateThe IIETF will provide direction to the Cregarding delivery of these user requiremAPB’s Identification Services Subcommand the Compact Council.The first meeting with IIETF is February CJIS in Clarksburg, WV. The IIETF will review this initial analysis and provide grespect of the gathered requirements. 
NGI Initiatives

Initiative #1

Enhance the AFIS segment of IAFIS to bett

customers’ need for higher identification accAutomated Fingerprint Identification System processing of ten print image submissions telectronically scanned, rolled, and flat finge

Initiative #2

Automate the IAFIS Quality Check function

Initiative #3

Enhance the overall IAFIS Interstate Photo functionality to increase the number of photprovide external customers easier access to data. 
NGI Initiatives

Initiative #4

Create an enhanced criminal history Disposition Reporting function by usintechnology to provide law enforcement reporting capability.

Initiative #5

Create a combined civil and criminal finrepository (Enhanced IAFIS Repositorwill augment IAFIS criminal and civil crimhistory search and response capability. 

Initiative #6

Design a new National Palm Print biomidentification functionality in IAFIS.
NGI Initiatives

Significant Areas of Interest #1

A Multi-modal Biometric framework within Program was not identified as an individuato this effort. However, after canvassing thcommunity it was determined a staff paper written for IIETF review regarding this approverall multi-modal biometric concept woulfollows:

– The ability to accept and store additiona

information

– The ability to search additional biometric 

independently by modality

– The study of fusion within IAFIS to comb

results of various biometric modalities 

.
NGI Initiatives

Significant Areas of Interest #2

Enhancements to Latent functionality within the N

identified as an individual initiative prior to this eff

canvassing the IAFIS user community it was deterequirements generated from the latent users weto include the latent services within AFIT. Therefowas written for IIETF review regarding latent func

An area of concern identified through the NGI reqwas the need for the FBI to develop a national latwould address issues such as the following:

– Training– Integration of ULW and RFES software to leve

possible features and address new NGI latent 

– Reassess daily latent search capacity and cu

policy

– Develop a national marketing plan for latent s
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50241 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. ROSARIO MUNIZ TELLEZ Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:06-CR-158-ALL
Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Rosario Muniz Tellez appeals his conviction following a jury trial for being an unlawful user of a controlled substance in possession of ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3). He argues that the district court erred in denying his request for an instruction and jury charge that included the definition of“unlawful user” that this court used in United Statesv. Herrera, 289 F.3d 311, 323-24 (Herrera I ), vacated, United Statesv. Herrera, 313 F.3d 882 (5th Cir. 2002) (en banc) (H errera II ). The Government moves for summary United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 24, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-50241

2 affirmance on the ground that Muniz Tellez’s argument is foreclosed by our precedent or, in the alternative, for an extension oftime tofile an appellate brief. We review a district court’s refusal to give a requested jury instruction for abuse of discretion. U nited States v. Cain, 440 F.3d 672, 674 (5th Cir. 2006)

. Muniz Tellez’s argument that the district court erred in refusing to give thejury
a Herrera I instruction is foreclosed by our precedent, particularly our decision in United States v. Patterson, 431 F.3d 832, 837-39 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 2043 (2006). Seealso United Statesv. McCowan, 469 F.3d 386, 391-92 (5th Cir. 2006); Herrera II , 313 F.3d at 883-85. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file an appellate brief is DENIED.
Exhibit 4.8

                              AMENDED AND RESTATED

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


$132,658.00                                                        JUNE 10, 2004


         FOR VALUE RECEIVED,  Viper Motorcycle Company ("Viper") hereby promises
to pay to the order of Donald F. Shiff  ("Shiff"),  his heirs and  assigns,  the
principal  sum of One Hundred  Thirty Two  Thousand  Six  Hundred  Fifty Eight &
No/100  Dollars  ($132,658.00),  together with interest on the unpaid  principal
balance  hereof  at a rate of eight  percent  (8%) per  annum.  This  Note is an
amendment and restatement,  but not a novation or refinancing, of the Promissory
Note from Company to Shiff dated  February  15, 2004 in the  original  principal
amount of $132,658.00

         This  promissory  note  consolidates  all previous loans and notes from
Shiff  to  Viper.  The  outstanding  principal  amount,  as of the  date of this
agreement,  as stated above,  shall become due and payable on September 30, 2004
or upon completion of the Initial Public Offering of Viper  Motorcycle  Company,
whichever is sooner.  All payments shall be made payable to Donald F. Shiff, and
shall be sent to his then current address,  which is presently 6400 Flying Cloud
Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55344.

If the  pending  IPO of Viper  Motorcycle  Company  becomes  effective  prior to
September  30,  2004,  the  holder  (Shiff)  of  this  Note  agrees  to  convert
seventy-five  thousand dollars  ($75,000.00) of principal hereof into restricted
common shares of the Company on the basis of Two Dollars and Fifty Cents ($2.50)
per share.

         Viper  agrees to pay this Note and, in the event of default,  all costs
of collection, including reasonable attorney's fees.



                                              VIPER MOTORCYCLE COMPANY




                                              /s/ Garry N. Lowenthal
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Garry N. Lowenthal
                                              Chief Financial Officer


                                Accepted By:  /s/ Donald F. Shiff
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Donald F. Shiff
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 220 (Friday, November 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 68345]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27012]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8949]


 Executive Order 11423, as Amended; Notice of Receipt of 
Application for a Presidential Permit for the Columbus Land Port of 
Entry Replacement Facility on the U.S.-Mexico Border at Columbus, New 
Mexico, and Palomas, Chihuahua, Mexico

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State hereby gives notice that, on September 
24, 2014, it received an application for a Presidential Permit to 
replace and expand the Columbus Land Port of Entry (LPOE) on the U.S.-
Mexico Border at Columbus, New Mexico, and Palomas, Chihuahua, Mexico. 
The United States General Services Administration (GSA) filed this 
application. The Department of State's jurisdiction over this 
application is based upon Executive Order 11423 of August 16, 1968, as 
amended. As provided in E.O. 11423, the Department is circulating this 
application to relevant federal agencies for review and comment. Under 
E.O. 11423, the Department has the responsibility to determine, taking 
into account input from these agencies and other stakeholders, whether 
issuance of a Presidential Permit for the proposed replacement and 
expansion of this border crossing would serve the national interest. 
Interested members of the public are invited to submit written comments 
regarding this application on or before December 15, 2014 to the U.S.-
Mexico Border Affairs Office, via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4d1a050c600f223f29283f0c2b2b2c243f3e0d3e392c3928632a223b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aff8e7ee82edc0ddcbcaddeec9c9cec6dddcefdcdbcedbca81c8c0d9">[email protected]</span></a> 
or by mail at WHA/MEX--Room 3924, Department of State, 2201 C St. NW., 
Washington, DC 20520.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: U.S.-Mexico Border Affairs Office, via 
email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#792e3138543b160b1d1c0b381f1f18100b0a390a0d180d1c571e160f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="67302f264a250815030215260101060e151427141306130249000811">[email protected]</span></a>; by phone at 202-647-9894; or by 
mail at WHA/MEX--Room 3924, Department of State, 2201 C St. NW., 
Washington, DC 20520.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The application and supporting documents are 
available for review in the Office of Mexican Affairs, Border Affairs 
Unit, Department of State, during normal business hours.

    Dated: November 7, 2014.
Robin Matthewman,
Director, Office of Mexican Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-27012 Filed 11-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-29-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>