alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 15.1


                                                                  April 27, 1998

ESG Re Limited
Skandia International House
#16 Church Street
Hamilton, Bermuda

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accounts, of the unaudited interim financial
information of ESG Re Limited and subsidiaries for the three month periods ended
March 31, 1998 and 1997, as indicated in our report dated April 27, 1998; 
because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that 
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement #333-40341 on Form S-8.

We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


                                             Deloitte & Touche
                                             Chartered Accountants
                                             Hamilton, Bermuda

                                      E-15
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, David Mitchell, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust and
Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC (the registrant);2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors:  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: March 24, 2005 /s/ David Mitchell
David Mitchell
Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**Certificationof Chief Financial Officer**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of FirstConsulting Group, Inc., a Delaware, corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies,to his knowledge, that:

(i)    the accompanying QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)   the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: August 9, 2006 | /s/ THOMAS A. WATFORD                                        |   |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                  | Thomas A. Watford                                            |
|                  | Chief Operating Officer and Interim Chief Financial  Officer |

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238.  This certification shall not be deemed “filed”for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,nor shall it be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company underthe Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

----
H. Res. 349

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 5, 1998.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (S. 1575)

to rename the Washington National Airport located in the

District of Columbia and Virginia as the ‘‘Ronald Reagan

Washington National Airport’’. The bill shall be considered as

read for amendment. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure; and (2)

one motion to recommit.

Attest:

Clerk.
H. Res. 522

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 10, 1998.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2538) to establish a Presidential commission

to determine the validity of certain land claims arising out of

the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo of 1848 involving the descendants of persons who were Mexican citizens at the time

of the Treaty. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed

with. Points of order against consideration of the bill for failure to comply with section 303(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 are waived. General debate shall be confined

to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

the Committee on Resources. After general debate the bill

shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute

rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for

the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the
2

•HRES 522 EH

amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the

Committee on Resources now printed in the bill, modified by

striking the last two sentences of subsection (c) of section 6.

Each section of that amendment in the nature of a substitute

shall be considered as read. During consideration of the bill

for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole

may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the

Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed

in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for

that purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request

for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five

minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without

intervening business, provided that the minimum time for

electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall

be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill

for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill

to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House

on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole

to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of a substitute

made in order as original text. The previous question shall be
3

•HRES 522 EH

considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to

final passage without intervening motion except one motion

to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
In recognition of manufacturing’s significant impact on the U.S. 

economy and its ability to spur innovation, in 2014 Congress 

passed the Revitalize American Manufacturing Innovation Act. 

The act established the multi-agency National Network for 

Manufacturing Innovation and a program at NIST to support it. 

The network consists of institutes whose goals include reducing 

the cost, time and risk of commercializing new technologies and 

improving existing technologies, processes and products. The 

institutes also support education, training and workforce recruitment. This coordinated effort can help to increase the benefits 

of manufacturing, which already returns $1.40 to the economy 

for every $1 invested. 

What NNMI Does

The National Network for Manufacturing Innovation provides a 

manufacturing research infrastructure where U.S. industry and 

academia collaborate to solve industry-relevant problems. The 

NNMI is a network of institutes that each has a unique focus, but 

a common goal to create, showcase and deploy new capabilities 

and new manufacturing processes. At the institutes, industry, 

academia and government partners are leveraging existing 

resources, collaborating and co-investing to nurture manufacturing innovation and accelerate commercialization.

BY THE 

NUMBERS

7

Manufacturing 

Innovation 

Institutes are 

operating

$520 

million

Federal funding 

planned for next 

five years

$1.1 billion

Non-federal investment 

planned for next five years

800+

Companies 

and universities are innovation institute 

members 

www.nist.gov

NNMI AND NIST
Recent Program Highlights

• Announced a Federal Funding Opportunity for up to two 

Department of Commerce Institutes for Manufacturing 

Innovation—the first NNMI solicitation to accept submissions on 

any topic. This format ensures that industry is involved in the 

identification of institute focus areas that are ready for privatesector investment.

• The NIST-hosted Advanced Manufacturing National Program 

Office put in place coordination mechanisms and tools to 

facilitate the sharing of best practices throughout the network. 

AMNPO also developed the NNMI Program Strategic Plan and 

the first NNMI Program Annual Report. 

New for FY 2017

The request includes an additional $22 million to continue to support and grow the National Network for Manufacturing Innovation. 

NIST will establish additional Institutes for Manufacturing Innovation through open-topic competitions.

Program Goals

• Increase the competitiveness of United States manufacturing.

• Facilitate the transition of 

innovative technologies into 

scalable, cost-effective, 

and high-performing domestic manufacturing capabilities.

• Accelerate the development of an advanced manufacturing workforce.

• Support business models that 

help institutes to become 

stable and sustainable.

0

10

20

30

40

50

Dollars, in millions

FY 2017

Budget

FY 2015 FY 2016

0

25

47
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certificationof Chief Financial Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer ofHyperSpace Communications, Inc. (the “*Company*”)hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i) theaccompanying Annual  Report onForm 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year  ended December 31, 2004 (the “*Report*”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|               | /s/  Mark Pougnet        |
|--------------------|--------------------------|
| March 31,2005 | Mark  Pougnet            |
|               | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 245 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      November 9, 1997.
Whereas United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan appointed former United 
        States Secretary of State James Baker III as his Personal Envoy for 
        Western Sahara to end the prevailing referendum stalemate;
Whereas talks between the Kingdom of Morocco and the Front for the Liberation of 
        Saguia el Hamra and Rio de Oro (also known as the Polisario Front) 
        mediated by Mr. Baker have achieved agreement on ways to end the 
        referendum stalemate;
Whereas the end of the stalemate over the Western Sahara referendum would allow 
        for the release of civilian political prisoners and prisoners of war 
        held by Morocco and the Polisario Front; and
Whereas the United States supports the holding of a free, fair, and transparent 
        referendum on self-determination for the people of Western Sahara: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) expresses its full support to former United States Secretary of 
        State James Baker III in his mission as Personal Envoy of the United 
        Nations Secretary General for the Western Sahara;
            (2) expresses its support for a referendum on self-determination for 
        the people of Western Sahara that should meet the following criteria:
                    (A) free, fair, and transparent and held in the presence of 
                international and domestic observers and international media 
                without administrative or military pressure or interference;
                    (B) only genuine Sahrawis, as identified in the method 
                agreed to by both sides, will take part in the referendum 
                voting; and
                    (C) the result, once certified by the United Nations, is 
                accepted by both sides;
            (3) encourages the release of civilian political prisoners and 
        prisoners of war held by Morocco and the Polisario Front at the earliest 
        possible date; and
            (4) requests the administration to fully support former United 
        States Secretary of State James Baker III in his mission of organizing a 
        free, fair, and transparent referendum on self-determination for the 
        people of Western Sahara without military or administrative constraints.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**EXHIBIT 10.54**MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENTThe attached Amendment No. 2 to the Amended & Restated Brokerage Business Quota Share ReinsuranceAgreement has been submitted for regulatory approval. The participating companies below haveagreed to the attached Amendment No. 2 pending regulatory approval.       /s/ Francis M. Colalucci   9/18/2007         Tower Insurance Company of New York   Date         /s/ Francis M. Colalucci   9/18/2007         Tower National Insurance Company    Date         /s/ Joseph P. Beitz   9/7/2007         CastlePoint Reinsurance Company   Date  
1

 
Amendment No.2ToAmended and Restated
Letter Agreement between Registrant and Robert A. Eberle



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 September 30, 2005 
  
 Mr. Robert A. Eberle 
 7 Rockrimmon Road 
 North Hampton, NH 03862 
  
 Dear Rob:

  
 Reference is made to your Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with
Bottomline Technologies (de), Inc. (the “Company”) dated as of November 21, 2002 (the “Agreement”). By execution and delivery of this letter, the Company hereby agrees to continue the Agreement through its next subsequent
renewal term of November 21, 2008, unless sooner terminated in accordance with the provisions of Section 5 of the Agreement. For all purposes of the Agreement, such extension shall be deemed a portion of the Employment Period, as defined
in the Agreement. In all respects, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, as so extended, provided, however, that: 
  

	1.	It is agreed and acknowledged that your current titles for purposes of the Agreement are President, Chief Operating Officer and Secretary. The first sentence of Section 2 of
the Agreement is hereby amended accordingly. 

  

	2.	It is further agreed that your current base salary is $280,000, your current bonus opportunity is $280,000 and that Section 3.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended accordingly.
Further salary, bonus and equity incentive adjustments may be made from time to time in accordance with the terms of the Agreement as so extended. 

  

	3.	It is further agreed that all references to Stock Options in the Agreement shall also include any restricted stock grants of the Company’s common stock, and, wherever the
phrase “Stock Options” appears in the Agreement, it shall hereinafter refer to Stock Options and such restricted stock grants. 

  

	4.	It is further agreed that Section 6.1 of the Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: “and, in the case of termination by the employee pursuant to Section 5.6,
the provisions of Section 6.5 shall apply with respect to stock options granted prior to July 1, 2005 only.” 

  

	5.	 It is further agreed that the initial paragraph of Section 6.5 of the Agreement shall read as follows: “In the event that (a) a Change in Control
shall occur, (b) the Company’s Board of Directors appoints a new Chief Executive Officer other than by reason of the resignation of the Company’s current Chief Executive Officer or (c) the Employee’s employment with the












 September 30, 2005 
 Page 2 
  

 Company is terminated under Section 6.2, 6.3 or 6.4 of this Agreement and pursuant to the terms
of such provision this Section 6.5 applies”. 
  
 By execution of this
letter, you hereby agreed to the foregoing extension of the Agreement, and reaffirm your obligations under the Agreement. 
  
 Very truly yours, 
  
 Bottomline Technologies (de), Inc. 
  
  
  
  
 By:  /s/    JOSEPH LEO
BARRY                                      
           
         Joseph Leo Barry 
         Chairman, Compensation Committee 
  
  
  
  
 Acknowledged and Agreed: 
  
 /s/    ROBERT
EBERLE                                      
                   
 Robert Eberle
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

OAKLEY, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

ALL-INBIKE, et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 20-cv-03542 

Judge Robert W. Gettleman 

Magistrate Judge Young B. Kim 

PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A 

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, INCLUDING A TEMPORARY INJUNCTION, 

A TEMPORARY ASSET RESTRAINT, AND EXPEDITED DISCOVERY 

Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. (“Oakley” or “Plaintiff”) seeks entry of an ex parte temporary 

restraining order, including a temporary injunction against Defendants enjoining the 

manufacture, importation, distribution, offering for sale, and sale of infringing products, a 

temporary asset restraint, and expedited discovery in an action arising out of 35 U.S.C. § 271. A 

Memorandum of Law in Support is filed concurrently with this Motion. 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-03542 Document #: 13 Filed: 06/18/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:2214
2 

Dated this 18th day of June 2020. Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Justin R. Gaudio 

Amy Ziegler 

Justin R. Gaudio 

Jake M. Christensen 

Thomas J. Juettner 

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. 

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

312.360.0080 

312.360.9315 (facsimile) 

aziegler@gbc.law 

jgaudio@gbc.law 

jchristensen@gbc.law 

tjjuettner@gbc.law 

Counsel for Plaintiff Oakley, Inc.

Case: 1:20-cv-03542 Document #: 13 Filed: 06/18/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:2215
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Wnorablo 0. C. Randlo

Drr Sir:

pinion oi thir on raadr in pert 8 a Daputy Tax 608, aity of xnnir, rad uamled ,ln tanand, of fanorrfoa a thoorand population,

**ding** to maintain a DoputT Tax or.8 ofT%oa, and ths bal8noa oi o be btlilt**by** tha altq of Bmts. ION O?fEt Can the County lagallr **axpad** mnd8 out Of the Permanent xmpro~nt Fun6 r0r fhf

### 8 ptlrpoEs?
the O;~~?%%?a~uil(I the abora 

### propord building Can 

### the Couatf josntlywith 8nd ll80th8 P6man8tlt II&pPOVmWtt hlld8 iOr SeWlO? *I ofta th8 Oa8e Or Denoy VI).DaVid8OZ2, 

### S.W. 2nd 183-195."

### 555

### Elonoreblo C. C. tiandle,'pago 3 

### 556.

held thata ohm&' OOula 

### not jOin 

### a Oity 

### in puPoha8i;ocl 8 ERtBiOipd **buildin& to**  be wed by both tho~oounty and the ait:;. 

### We believethat thfr 

### opiniontogotherwith tha authorities oltod themundrr fully ammar pur question 

### andwe enclom it togetherwith OpinionHo. O-5978 **ior your**  **Ob8eTWitiOn.**

Thi8 

### a6partmntb* p2'*8Oltt 

### opinioai8 **be8.a on**  **&ho** root that the proporsabuilding **18** to b* owned ma,oontrd.U jointlybl the City Of **mi8** and ths County Of m118. If there were a 8OVOl'~BOO 88 $0 oWn8nl;hip

uld OOlttFOl ~a aitrerent rulrmight re8ult.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period from June 27, 2008 (commencement of operations) to March 31, 2009 of MacroShares $100 Oil Down Trust (the "Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), I, John A. Flanagan, principal financial officer of Macro Securities Depositor, LLC, which acts as the depositor for the Registrant (the "Depositor"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Annual Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.



Date: June 29, 2009

| |                                     
| | ------------------------------------
| | /s/ JOHN A. FLANAGAN                
| | John A. Flanagan                    
| | Chief Financial Officerof Depositor,
| | on behalf of Registrant