alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the period ending December 25, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, StevenTanner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that :

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Steven Tanner       |              |
|-------------------------|-------------------|
| Steven Tanner           |
|                    |
| Chief Financial Officer |
|                    |
|                    | February 21, 2006 |   |
|                         |                   |  |  |

 

----
1

Capillary μRheoSANS for 

High Shear Rate, Low 

Volume Studies

Zach Riedel, Clemson University, NCNR

Advisors: Katie Weigandt & Ryan Murphy, NCNR
Applications in industry

~1,000,000 s-1

2
Shear rate and traditional RheoSANS

h

v

Shear Rate: γγ̇ = v/h

~5000 s-1

7-20 mL Sample

3
Applications in industry

~1,000,000 s-1

4
Capillary μRheoSANS

5
Capillary μRheoSANS

6
Capillary size and velocity

20 μm

100 μm

7
Capillary fluid flow

Laminar Poiseuille Flow (Newtonian)

ττ = μμγγ̇

Shear Stress (ττ) Shear Rate (γγ̇) Velocity

Non-Newtonian

ττ = μμ γγ̇ ⋅ γγ̇

Shear Stress 8
Comparison to Slit μRheoSANS

High Shear Regions

100 μm

8 mm

100 μm

Flow Out 

of Screen

9

Approximate Scattering 

Volume [μL]

SANS 100

Slit Cell 10

Capillary 1
Determining physical limits

10
Wormlike micelles

Cross-section

Hydrophilic head

Hydrophobic tail

11
Micelles under high shear

12
Small Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS)

Beam Source

Capillary

Q

Detector

QQ =

4ππ � sin θθ

λλ

θ λ

13
2D SANS profiles

Wall γγ̇ = 1.3∙104 s-1

WLM (SLES 4.6% NaCl 8%)

Wall γγ̇ = 0 s-1

WLM (SLES 4.6% NaCl 8%)

14
Micelle alignment factors

15
Wall shear rate scattering isolation

Isolated High γγ̇ Region 

- =

Qx (Å-1)

Qy (Å-1)

Qx (Å-1)

Qy (Å-1)

Qx (Å-1)

Qy (Å-1)

Wall γγ̇ = 1.3·104 s-1 Wall γγ̇ = 6.4·103 s

16
Validating results

γγ̇

max = 7.5·105 s-

Vsample = 2 mL 100 101 102 103

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

Maximum shear rate (s-1)

ID (μm)

10-4

10-3

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

103

Sample volume (%)

1.15% SLES Optimization (L = 1 m)

17
Acknowledgements

 Katie Weigandt

 Ryan Murphy

 Javen Weston

SURF Award Number: 70NANB18H141 

18
Questions

19
20
Extra Slides

21
Comparison to Slit μRheoSANS

Slit Cell1

22
Comparison to Slit μRheoSANS

High γγ̇

High γγ̇

Capillary

Slit Cell

23
Important equations

γγ̇ =

4QQ

ππRR3

ττ =

ΔPP

2LL

vv =

ΔPPRR2

4μμ 1 − rr⁄RR 2

μμ =

ΔPP RR4

8LL γγ̇

WWWW = γγaȧ 1

4 3 +

dd ln γγaȧ

dd ln ττ

ττ = μμγγ̇

Apparent Wall 

Shear Rate

Shear Stress Capillary Shear Stress Capillary Velocity

Capillary Viscosity

(Hagen-Poiseuille)

Corrected Wall Shear Rate

(Weissenberg-Rabinowitsch)

RRRR =

ρρρρ

AA

Reynold’s Number

24
Micelle alignment factors

25
Stability of micelle pressure drops

26
Other capillary jet video

27
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cole Credit Property Trust, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Cole Credit Property Trust, Inc.Date: March 29, 2010
    By:
    /s/ D. Kirk McAllaster, Jr.Name:
    D. Kirk McAllaster, Jr.Title:
    Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Director
(Principal Financial Officer)
**EXHIBIT 31.2****Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.**I, Donna G. Lee, Chief Financial Officer of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of Xenonics Holdings, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the periods covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;  4. The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluationof internal control over financial reporting**,**to the issuer’s auditorsand the audit committee of issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date:  December 14, 2006 /s/  Donna G. Lee   Name:  Donna G. Lee   Title:  Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,144,126
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             5,490,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      2,547,830
<ALLOWANCE>                                     15,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,719,360
<DEPOSITS>                                   5,866,191
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             21,418
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       512,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,319,751
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              10,719,360
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 17,616
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               148,321
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               165,937
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              10,944
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,683
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          138,254
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   15,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                318,606
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (195,157)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    (195,157)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (195,157)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.38)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     3.6
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               15,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            15,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1  Consent of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements (i) Form S-3 (No. 333-126938, No. 333-128013 and No. 333-143037)
and in the related Prospectus, (ii) Form S-4 (No. 333-147765) and in the
related Prospectus, (iii) Form S-8 (No. 333-121051) pertaining to the Gramercy
Capital Corp. Equity Incentive Plan,  and
(iv) Form S-8 (No. 333-149838) pertaining to the Gramercy Capital Corp. 2008
Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our reports dated March 16, 2009 with respect
to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Gramercy Capital
Corp., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of
Gramercy Capital Corp., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2008.   /s/
  Ernst and Young LLPNew
  York, New YorkMarch 16,
  2009
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 538 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 16, 1998.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 4550) to provide for programs to facilitate a significant reduction 
in the incidence and prevalence of substance abuse through reducing the demand 
for illegal drugs and the inappropriate use of legal drugs. The first reading of 
the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill 
and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by Representative 
Hastert of Illinois or a designee and a Member opposed to the bill. After 
general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 
rule for a period not to exceed three hours. Before consideration of any other 
amendment it shall be in order to consider the amendment printed in the report 
of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered by a Member 
designated in the report. That amendment shall be considered as read, shall be 
debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by 
the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 
be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 
Committee of the Whole. After disposition of that amendment, the provisions of 
the bill as then perfected shall be considered as original text for the purpose 
of further amendment under the five-minute rule. During consideration of the 
bill for further amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may 
accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an 
amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record 
designated for that purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII. Amendments so printed 
shall be considered as read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) 
postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole 
a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes 
the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows 
another electronic vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum 
time for electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 
minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 
Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as 
may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion 
except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel D. LUJAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-10398.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Jan. 6, 2005.

Vicki H. Lamberson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District .of Texas, Amarillo, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Manuel D Lujan, Littleton, CO, pro se.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Manuel D. Lujan appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for an extension of time to file a late appeal from his conviction for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. Lujan’s motion for leave to file an untimely notice of appeal was not filed within the 40-day period prescribed by Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4). Therefore, the district court was without authority to extend the appeal period, and Lujan had no right to relief by showing excusable neglect or good cause. *See*
      *376
      *United States v. Awalt,*728 F.2d 704, 705 (5th Cir.1984); Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4). Accordingly, Lujan’s appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction; his motions for the appointment of counsel and a copy of the transcript at government expense are DENIED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

CAMELBAK PRODUCTS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”,

Defendants.

Civil Action No.: 1:20-cv-03947

Judge Thomas M. Durkin

Magistrate Judge Susan E. Cox

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby files this Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal, without prejudice, as to the following Defendant(s) identified on Schedule A of the 

Complaint:

NO. DEFENDANT

184 twinjoy

196 Harry

205 Like a jade fire fox dress

66 jinhzhang6693

65 hiuhihu66

67 liyanglie66

68 mengfanfan662

69 xiaoming1987

62 changxiong666

64 Fast_Fish

217 Cherry Summer Hot Sale Cleareance

138 jerry05

161 honeystore2011

Case: 1:20-cv-03947 Document #: 35 Filed: 09/14/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:4301
DATED: September 14, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt (Bar No. 6207971)

Keith Vogt, Ltd.

111 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1700

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Telephone: 312-675-6079

E-mail: keith@vogtip.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case: 1:20-cv-03947 Document #: 35 Filed: 09/14/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:4302
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document was electronically filed on September 14, 2020 with the Clerk of the Court using the 

CM/ECF system, which will automatically send an email notification of such filing to all registered 

attorneys of record.

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt

Case: 1:20-cv-03947 Document #: 35 Filed: 09/14/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:4303
#### AMERICAN BAYRIDGE CORP., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

Slip Op. 99-8.

Court No. 98-08-02682.

United States Court of International Trade.

Jan. 21, 1999.

JUDGMENT

BARZILAY, Judge.

This case contesting the decision of the United States Customs Service, in HQ962042, denying protest number 3401-98-100012 as to the classification of imported merchandise (“predrilled studs”) and the effective date of an interpretive ruling issued pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1625(e) having been submitted for decision; and the Court, after due deliberation, having rendered a decision in Slip Opinion No. 98-166; and

Whereas the United States Customs Service has made available to the Court port instructions which it intends to issue in light of said Slip Opinion, a copy of which will be filed with the Court upon entry of final judgment by the Court in this case, declaring its intention to post Bulletin notices of liquidation or reliquidation, as appropriate, within 30 days of its receipt of Supplemental Information Letters or timely protests from affected importers;

Now therefore, in conformity with said decision it is

ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment as to the classification of predrilled studs under heading 4418, HTSUS, be and hereby is, denied; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment, as to the classification of predrilled studs, be and hereby is, granted, upholding classification under subheading 4407.10.00, HTSUS; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment as to the effective date of an interpretive ruling issued pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1625(c) with respect to the rights of all importers, be and hereby is, granted; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment as to the effective date of an interpretive ruling issued pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1625(e), be and hereby is, denied.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 514

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Attorney General

Janet Reno should apply to the Special Division of the United States

Court of Appeals for the appointment of an independent counsel to

investigate a number of matters relating to the campaign finance investigation currently being conducted by the Department of Justice.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 31, 1998

Mr. BARR of Georgia (for himself, Mr. DELAY, and Mr. BURTON of Indiana)

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

Attorney General Janet Reno should apply to the Special

Division of the United States Court of Appeals for the

appointment of an independent counsel to investigate

a number of matters relating to the campaign finance

investigation currently being conducted by the Department of Justice.

Whereas the majority of the members of the Committee on

the Judiciary of the House of Representatives, in letters

dated March 12, 1997, and September 3, 1997, requested that the Attorney General apply for the appointment of an independent counsel for the campaign finance

investigation and related matters;
2

•HRES 514 IH

Whereas the majority of the members of the Committee on

the Judiciary of the Senate, in a letter dated March 13,

1997, requested that the Attorney General request the

appointment of an independent counsel for the campaign

finance investigation and related matters;

Whereas the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation,

Louis Freeh, in a memorandum sent to the Attorney

General in November 1997, called for the appointment of

an independent counsel for the campaign finance investigation and related matters; and

Whereas after a 10-month inquiry, Charles G. LaBella, the

supervising attorney of the Department of Justice’s Campaign Finance Task Force, has submitted a report to the

Attorney General recommending that she request the appointment of an independent counsel for the campaign finance investigation and related matters: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House that—

2 (1) the Attorney General should faithfully up3 hold and execute the laws she has sworn to uphold,

4 specifically by seeking application for an independent

5 counsel for the campaign finance investigation and

6 related matters; and

7 (2) the President should direct the Attorney

8 General to seek application for an independent coun9 sel for the campaign finance investigation and re10 lated matters.

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

HOLGER FIALLO,

Plaintiff,

v.

BREWDOG BREWING COMPANY LLC,

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-04141

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, Holger Fiallo, and Defendant, Brewdog Brewing Company, LLC, by and 

through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate that: 

1. This action shall be DISMISSED, with prejudice, as between all parties, and;

2. Each party shall bear their own costs and fees, including attorneys’ fees, 

incurred in connection with this action.

Dated: November 20, 2020

NYE STIRLING, HALE & 

MILLER, LLP

By: /s/ Benjamin J. Sweet

Benjamin J. Sweet, Esq.

ben@nshmlaw.com

1145 Bower Hill Road, Ste 104

Pittsburgh, PA 15243

 Phone: (412) 857-5350 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

 O’HAGAN MEYER LLC

By: /s/ Ryan T. Benson

Ryan T. Benson, Esq.

rbenson@ohaganmeyer.com

One East Wacker Drive, Suite 3400

Chicago, Illinois 60601

Phone: (312) 422-6100

Attorneys for Defendant

Case: 1:20-cv-04141 Document #: 21 Filed: 11/20/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:80
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Benjamin J. Sweet, hereby certify that the foregoing document was filed through 

the ECF system and will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified 

on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated 

as non-registered participants this 20th day of November, 2020.

 /s/ Benjamin J. Sweet

 Benjamin J. Sweet

Case: 1:20-cv-04141 Document #: 21 Filed: 11/20/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:81