alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lowell T. Johnson *v.*State of Indiana.

[No. 2-1074A255.

Filed September 11, 1975].

*David F. McNamar, Steers, Klee, Sullivan, McNamar & Rogers,*Indianapolis, for appellant.

*Theodore L. Sendak,*Attorney General, *Walter F. Lockhart,*Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

Per Curiam

Appellant-defendant, Lowell T. Johnson, (Johnson) was convicted of possession of heroin, IC 1971, 35-24.1-4-1 (c), Ind. Ann. Stat. § 10-3561 (c) (Burns Supp. 1974). The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the trial *637court erred in admitting in evidence a duplicate original search warrant.

We affirm.

Premised upon information supplied by a reliable informant, an Indianapolis Police Officer sought and obtained a warrant authorizing the search of the residence and person of Johnson for illegal narcotics. Pursuant to a search based upon that warrant, the officers seized quantities of heroin.

At trial, Johnson objected to any testimony concerning the search until the State introduced the warrant in evidence. When the State attempted to introduce the actual warrant served by the officers, Johnson unsuccessfully objected on the premise that the warrant was only a copy and it was not offered by the official custodian.

Johnson contends that before the State was entitled to introduce the testimony of the officers and the evidence obtained in the subsequent search, a valid warrant must have been introduced in evidence. It is Johnson’s contention that, Ind. Ann. Stat. 34-1-17-7 (Burns Code Ed.), in conjunction with Ind. Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 44 (A) (1), require that copies of records must be certified by the official custodian to be admissible into evidence. Johnson argues that in the absence of the certification, the “copy” introduced did not suffice to prove the existence of a valid search warrant. Therefore, it was improper to admit testimony concerning the search and evidence obtained in the search.

We agree with Johnson’s contention that copies of official records must be certified or introduced by the official custodian ; however, the search warrant here involved was a duplicate original, *not a copy.*It is a well established principle that *executed*carbon duplicates of documents are to be regarded as originals. Recently, in *Roberts v*. *State*(1975), 164 Ind. App. 354, 328 N.E.2d 429, this Court stated:

> “. . . [Sjigned carbon copies of documents are to be regarded as duplicate originals, any of which may be received in evidence. . . .” 328 N.E.2d 429, 430.

*638clarifying that a duplicate original is tantamount to an original, not a copy.

The warrant introduced over Johnson’s objection is a duplicate original, i.e., a carbon copy executed by the magistrate. It bears the official file stamp of a court clerk as well as the original signatures of the affiant officer and issuing magistrate.

Consequently, the duplicate original search warrant and the evidence subsequently seized based on that warrant were admissible.

Judgment affirmed.

Note. — Reported at 333 N.E.2d 307.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Cancer Advisory Board, December 01, 2014, 06:00 p.m. to December 02, 2014, 06:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Building 31, 31 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 03, 2014, 79FR65221.                

This meeting is being amended to cancel the ad Hoc Subcommittee on Global Cancer Research meeting being held on December 1, 2014 from 06:00 p.m. to 07:30 p.m. The meeting is partially closed to the public.

 Dated: November 10, 2014.

Melanie J. Gray,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2014-27057 Filed 11-13-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

BRUNO RANIERI,

Plaintiff,

v.

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, 

INC. and RELX INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:20-cv-04150

Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr.

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

NOW COMES the Plaintiff, BRUNO RANIERI, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 

41(a)(1)(A)(i), hereby dismissing his claims against Defendant, RELX INC., without prejudice, 

with all parties to bear their own attorney’s fees and cost.

Dated: September 30, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

BRUNO RANIERI

By: /s/ Mohammed O. Badwan

Mohammed O. Badwan

SULAIMAN LAW GROUP, LTD.

2500 South Highland Avenue

Suite 200

Lombard, Illinois 60148

+1 630-575-8181

mbadwan@sulaimanlaw.com

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04150 Document #: 23 Filed: 09/30/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:77
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CURRENCY>                    US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         62,047,845
<SECURITIES>                                   2,332,399
<RECEIVABLES>                                  16,334,603
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (798,437)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               80,384,810
<PP&E>                                         5,213,493
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (689,982)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 85,273,769
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          16,885,266
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       16,414
<OTHER-SE>                                     67,649,929
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   85,273,769
<SALES>                                        13,003,544
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               13,003,544
<CGS>                                          8,844,583
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,998,140
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             16,119
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,427,253)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,427,253)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,427,253)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.31)
        


</TABLE>
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 386

Electing the Honorable Richard K. Armey of Texas to act as Speaker pro

tempore.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 17, 1998

Mr. BOEHNER submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Electing the Honorable Richard K. Armey of Texas to act

as Speaker pro tempore.

1 Resolved, That the Honorable Richard K. Armey, a

2 Representative from the State of Texas, be, and he is here3 by, elected Speaker pro tempore on this day.

4 SEC. 2. The Clerk of the House shall notify the Presi5 dent of the United States and the Senate of the election

6 of the Honorable Richard K. Armey as Speaker pro tem7 pore during the absence of the Speaker.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 490 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 25, 1998.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2676) to amend the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restructure and reform the Internal Revenue 
Service, and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference 
report and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be 
considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Case 2:15-cr-01602-DLR Document 3 Filed 11/06/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01602-DLR Document 3 Filed 11/06/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01602-DLR Document 3 Filed 11/06/15 Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

# AGENCY:

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

      ( print page 64595)    

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The FDIC is correcting a Notice of Open Meeting that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         of October 14, 2014 (79 FR 61641), regarding a meeting of the FDIC Advisory Committee on Economic Inclusion. This publication corrects a typographical error in the meeting date appearing on page 61641 in the                         **DATES**                         section.                    

*Effective Date of Correction:*                         The correction is effective upon publication in the                         **Federal Register.**

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary, 202-898-3811.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In FR Doc. 2014-24322, appearing on page 61641 in the                     **Federal Register**                     of October 14, 2014, the following correction is made:                

# DATES:

Wednesday, October 29, 2014, from 9:00 a.m. to 3:15 p.m.

Dated October 27, 2014.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2014-25816 Filed 10-29-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

John McDonald

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03653

Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer

J.B. Pritzker

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, June 24, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: Telephone hearing on

Plaintiff's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction

[6] set 6/25/2020 at 10:00 a.m. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to

listen to this hearing. The call−in number is 877−336−1839 and the access code is

6708061. Counsel of record will receive an email 15 minutes prior to the start of the

telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to

proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and

rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in

sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future

hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by

the Court. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
ILND 450 (Rev. 10/13) Judgment in a Civil Action

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

JOHN MATHYS, ,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

THE HARTFORD GOLD GROUP, LLC d/b/a 

AMERICAN HARTFORD GOLD GROUP and 

DAVID WOLAN, ,

Defendant(s).

Case No. 20 C 3927

Judge 

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Judgment is hereby entered (check appropriate box):

in favor of plaintiff(s)

and against defendant(s)

in the amount of $ ,

which includes pre–judgment interest. 

does not include pre–judgment interest.

Post-judgment interest accrues on that amount at the rate provided by law from the date of this judgment. 

Plaintiff(s) shall recover costs from defendant(s).

in favor of defendant(s) 

and against plaintiff(s)

.

Defendant(s) shall recover costs from plaintiff(s).

other: The Court grants Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration (Dkt. # 13). Mathys is ordered 

to proceed with his claims in arbitration. 

This action was (check one):

tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. 

tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision was reached. 

decided by Judge Charles P. Kocoras on a motion to compel. 

Date: 12/7/2020 Thomas G. Bruton, Clerk of Court

Case: 1:20-cv-03927 Document #: 28 Filed: 12/07/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:512
ILND 450 (Rev. 10/13) Judgment in a Civil Action

Vettina Franklin , Deputy Clerk

Case: 1:20-cv-03927 Document #: 28 Filed: 12/07/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:513
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF HAWKER PACIFIC AEROSPACE FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       3,626,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,803,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,028,000
<INVENTORY>                                 27,021,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            43,540,000
<PP&E>                                      59,921,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,001,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              94,131,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       77,212,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        3,750,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    25,526,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                94,131,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,533,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,528,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,724,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,560,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,279,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,797,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (11,076,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (11,076,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.90)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

** **

ANNUAL MASTER SERVICER’S CERTIFICATE

 

WELLS FARGO DEALER FLOORPLAN MASTER NOTETRUST

 

March 29, 2019

 

The undersigned, aduly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), as the master servicer (the “MasterServicer”), pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement dated as of July 11, 2014 (as may be furtheramended and supplemented from time to time, the “Agreement”), between Wells Fargo and Wells Fargo Dealer FloorplanMaster Note Trust (“Trust”), does hereby certify that:

 

1.          WellsFargo is, as of the date hereof, Master Servicer under the Agreement.

 

2.          Areview of the activities of Master Servicer during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 (the “reporting period”),and of its performance under the Agreement, has been made under my supervision.

 

3.          Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the reporting period.

 

 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has duly executed this certificate the date first above written.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulation to Extend Dismissal Date (Doc. 275).

Finding good cause appearing, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Stipulation to Extend (Doc. 275) is granted. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case will be dismissed with prejudice on 

November 8, 2019 unless a stipulation to dismiss is filed prior to the dismissal date.

Dated this 9th day of September, 2019.

Honorable Steven P. Logan

United States District Judge

Keith Early, et al.,

 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

State of Arizona, et al.,

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-16-00031-PHX-SPL (DMF)

ORDER

Case 2:16-cv-00031-SPL-DMF Document 276 Filed 09/10/19 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 99.11




CONSENT OF ERIC OLSON
 
  The undersigned hereby consents to reference to the undersigned’s name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 40-F being filed by Mercator Minerals Ltd. (the “Corporation”) with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with (1) the “Technical Report Mineral Park Mine – Preliminary Feasibility Study on Expansion to 37,000 TPD Milling Facilities and Reserve Estimate Mohave County, Arizona” dated September 1, 2006 (the “Mineral Park Report”), (2) the “Technical Report – Preliminary Feasibility Study on Phase I & Phase II Copper – Molly Milling Expansion, Mineral Park Mine, Mohave County, Arizona” dated December 29, 2006 (the “December Report”) and (3) the annual information form of the Corporation dated March 30, 2012, which includes reference to our name in connection with information relating to the Mineral Park Report and the December Report and the properties described therein.
  Date: March 30, 2012
   /s/ Eric Olson

Eric Olson
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 24

- 00001

- CV

SAMUEL ELGUEZABAL

- MOTA AND AVANZA CONSTRUCTION AND EARTHWORKS, LLC , Appellant s
v.
MELANIE BROWN, AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF THOMAS J. BROWN, JR., DECEASED, MELANIE BROWN A/N/F OF ESTHER RUTH BROWN, AND THOMAS BROWN, SR. , Appellee s

From the 170th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021

- 3526

- 4

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 21, 2024, the parties filed a “Status Report and Agreed Motion to
Vacate Trial Court’s Judgment and Remand in Light of Settlement.” The parties state in
the motion that they have reached an agreement to settle this case. The parties ask that
we set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand th is caseElguezabal

- Mota v. Brown Page 2 to the trial court for rendition of judgm ent in accordance with their agreement. See T EX

.

R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

The parties’ agreed motion is granted. W e set aside the trial court’s judgment
without regard to the merits and remand th is case to the trial court for further
proceedings in ac cordance with the parties’ agreement.

MATT JOHNSON Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson , and Justice Smith Set aside and remanded Opinion delivered and filed February 29, 2024 [CV 06 ]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CORD BLOOD AMERICA, INC.
      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the annual report of Cord Blood America, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Sandra D. Smith, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer), of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:   April 5, 2005


/s/Sandra D. Smith
-----------------------
Sandra D. Smith
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)