alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
As of: 8/19/21 8:59 AM 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Received: August 18, 2021 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. ksi-crwf-hr0k 

Comments Due: August 19, 2021 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: NIST-2021-0004 

Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework 

Comment On: NIST-2021-0004-0001 

Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework 

Document: NIST-2021-0004-DRAFT-0022 

Comment on FR Doc # 2021-1617 6 

Submitter Information 

Email:

Organization: AI Village 

General Comment 

The AI Village* welcomes the NIST RFI on Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework. Such a 

framework is long overdue to confidently adopt AI in production systems, including mission-, securityand safety-critical applications. 

Our response is articulated on five axes: (i) concrete and current risk, (ii) actionability, (iii) organizations 

focus, (iv) case specific and (v) existing and upcoming standards. 

More specifically each of those five axes tries to answer a specific need of the framework: 

Concrete and current risk: This addresses the lack of adequate and easily manipulable risk definition in 

the case ofAI systems and the current divide between risks faced today in production by organizations 

and the hypothetical and future risks considered in a number ofReliable AI academic publications. As a 

strongly industry focused organization, we believe the former should be given immediate priority and the 

latter should be used primarily as a support vector for threat anticipation. 

Actionability: This axis addresses the current difficulty in making AI risk assessments and mitigation 

operational including both the methodological and tooling gaps in conducting end-to-end AI risk 

assessments. We identify gaps in enforceability as well as current risk and testing methodologies that will 

need to be filled ahead of proper AI risk assessment engagements. 

Organizational focus: By this axis we address the incentives, budget obtention, team reorganizations, 

business integration and related organizational challenges that implementers will eventually face in their 

respective organizations. The framework will need to provide answers on those points to ease its 

deployment in complex governance schemes. 

Case specific: By this axis we seek to address specific challenges that will arise on a case by case basis

and which a generic framework might be incapable of covering. In our response, we take specific 

attention in addressing both large and small organizations, specific industries like finance, ICS and
IV

House Calendar No. 174

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 416

[Report No. 105–505]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 3579) making emergency supplemental appropriations for the

fiscal year ending September 30, 1998, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 30, 1998

Mr. SOLOMON, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 3579) making emergency supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1998, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 3579) making emergency supple4 mental appropriations for the fiscal year ending Septem5 ber 30, 1998, and for other purposes. All points of order

6 against the conference report and against its consideration
2

HRES 416 RH

1 are waived. The conference report shall be considered as

2 read.

House Calendar No. 174

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 416

[Report No. 105–505]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference reother purposes. fiscal year ending September 30, 1998, and for emergency supplemental appropriations for the port to accompany the bill (H.R. 3579) making

APRIL 30, 1998

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
DISMISS; Opinion Filed February 12 , 2014. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00412

- CV

PINE CREEK MEDICAL C ENTER , Appellant
V.
MARGARET HIGHTOWER , Appellee

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 12

- 06105

- D



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Lewis
The Court has before it appellant’s January 17, 2014 unopposed motion to dismiss the

appeal. In the motion, appellant states that appellee filed a notice of nonsuit with prejudice as to

all claims against appellant in the trial court. Accordingly, we GRANT appellant’s motion and

DISMISS this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a).

130412F.P05 /David Lewis/
DAVID LEWIS JUSTICE– 2

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

PINE CREEK MEDICAL CENTER, Appellant

No. 05

- 13

- 00412

- CV V.

MARGARET HIGHTOWER, Appellee On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 12

- 06105

- D. Opinion delivered by Justice Lewis. Justices Bridges and Fillmore participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal, unless the parties have agreed otherwise.

Judgment entered this 12th day of February, 2014.

/David Lewis/

DAVID LEWIS
JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 50 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 50

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that aviators who 
 meet the qualification standards of the Air Forces Escape and Evasion 
 Society should be granted recognition for meritorious service by the 
                         Department of Defense.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 1997

 Mr. Stearns submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on National Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that aviators who 
 meet the qualification standards of the Air Forces Escape and Evasion 
 Society should be granted recognition for meritorious service by the 
                         Department of Defense.

Whereas aviators in the Armed Forces have served the United States with great 
        courage and distinction in every conflict during the 20th century;
Whereas thousands of aviators in the Armed Forces have been shot down behind 
        enemy lines while performing their missions;
Whereas many of these aviators have overcome long odds and great hardships to 
        return to their units and resume their service to the United States;
Whereas these aviators faced the added responsibility of maintaining the secrecy 
        of their escape and evasion methods in order to protect the lives of 
        those who assisted them and other aviators;
Whereas this maintenance of secrecy has prevented aviators in the Armed Forces 
        from being recognized for their achievements;
Whereas the Air Forces Escape and Evasion Society has established strict 
        qualifications for membership and has served as a representative for 
        aviators in the Armed Forces; and
Whereas the Department of Defense has not provided adequate recognition to 
        aviators in the Armed Forces who have escaped or evaded capture behind 
        enemy lines: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
aviators who meet the qualification standards of the Air Forces Escape 
and Evasion Society should be granted recognition for meritorious 
service by the Department of Defense.
                                 <all>
```
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 45

To honor 1996 Nobel Peace Prize recipients Bishop Carlos Felipe Ximenes

Belo and Jose Ramos-Horta, and to express support for the process

of building a just and lasting peace in East Timor.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 10, 1997

Mr. HALL of Ohio (for himself, Mr. WOLF, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr.

SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island, Mrs. MORELLA,

Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. LANTOS, and Mr. PORTER) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

To honor 1996 Nobel Peace Prize recipients Bishop Carlos

Felipe Ximenes Belo and Jose Ramos-Horta, and to

express support for the process of building a just and

lasting peace in East Timor.

Whereas the Norwegian Nobel Committee has awarded the

Nobel Peace Prize for 1996 to Bishop Carlos Felipe

Ximenes Belo and Jose Ramos-Horta for their tireless efforts to find a just and peaceful solution to the conflict

in East Timor;

Whereas Indonesia invaded East Timor in 1975 and has

since systematically oppressed the people of East Timor;
2

•HRES 45 IH

Whereas since 1975 one-third of the population of East

Timor is estimated to have perished of starvation, war,

and terror;

Whereas Indonesia’s invasion was condemned by the United

Nations, as was its subsequent occupation of East Timor;

Whereas on November 12, 1991, Indonesian troops opened

fire on thousands of peaceful mourners and demonstrators at the Santa Cruz cemetery in Dili, the capital of

East Timor, killing hundreds and wounding hundreds;

Whereas Bishop Belo has been the preemminent representative of the people of East Timor, and has at great risk

to his own life fought for the human and civil rights of

the people of East Timor, while also being a steadfast advocate for nonviolence and dialogue between the people of

East Timor and the Indonesian authorities;

Whereas Ramos-Horta has since 1975 been the leading international spokesman for the people of East Timor, and

has made valuable contributions to their cause through

his efforts to create a peace plan for the region; and

Whereas both men are an inspiration not only for those who

desire peace in East Timor, but for those the world over

who seek peacefully to resolve longstanding, bloody conflicts: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the United States House of Rep2 resentatives—

3 (1) recognizes, admires, and honors Carlos

4 Felipe Ximenes Belo and Jose Ramos-Horta for

5 their sustained and self-sacrificing contributions on

6 behalf of their oppressed people;
3

•HRES 45 IH

1 (2) expresses its support for the continued ef2 forts of Bishop Belo, Ramos-Horta, and the people

3 of East Timor; and

4 (3) affirms its support for a diplomatic solution

5 to the conflict in East Timor based on the people’s

6 right to self-determination.

Æ
#### Donald Erasmus THEO-HARDING, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Respondent.

No. 04-1668.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 15, 2004.

Decided Dec. 29, 2004.

*301Randall L. Johnson, Johnson & Associates, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Donald E. Keener, Deputy Director, Alison Marie Igoe, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before LUTTIG, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Donald Erasmus Theo-Harding, a native and citizen of Sierra Leone, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming, without opinion, the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture.

Theo-Harding challenges the IJ’s determination that he failed to establish his eligibility *for*asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude Theo-Harding fails to show the evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief TheoHarding seeks.

In addition, we conclude Theo-Harding’s claim that the Board’s use of the summary affirmance procedure under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(e)(4) (2004) violated his rights under the Due Process Clause is foreclosed by our decision in *Blanco de Belbruno v. Ashcroft,*362 F.3d 272 (4th Cir.2004). In *Blanco de Belbruno,*we held that “the BIA’s streamlining regulations do not violate an alien’s rights to due process of law under the Fifth Amendment.” *Id.*at 283.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
Exhibit 32.1 - SECTION 1350



APD ANTIQUITIES, INC.



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with the periodic report of APD ANTIQUITIES, INC., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, CINDY K. SWANK, President, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer, and principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



Date: July 21, 2009



| |     |                                                         
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------
| | By: | /s/Cindy K. Swank                                       
| |     | Cindy K. Swank                                          
| |     | President, Treasurer, CEO, & Principal Financial Officer
H. Res. 262

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 8, 1997.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill (H.R.

1122) to amend title 18, United States Code, to ban partialbirth abortions, with Senate amendments thereto, and to consider in the House a single motion that the House concur in

each of the Senate amendments. The Senate amendments

and the motion shall be considered as read. The motion shall

be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee

on the Judiciary. The previous question shall be considered

as ordered on the motion to final adoption without intervening motion or demand for division of the question.

Attest:

Clerk.
SCWC-16-0000421

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

MICHELLE HELEN CASTILLON, 

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant. 

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-16-0000421; CASE NO. 3DTC-15-042273)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Michelle Helen

Castillon’s application for writ of certiorari filed on 

October 11, 2017, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be

heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 29, 2017.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-16-0000421

29-NOV-2017

04:29 PM
**Consent
      of Independent Registered** **Public** **Accounting** **Firm**






The
      Board
      of Directors


Macquarie
      Infrastructure Company LLC:




We
      consent to the incorporation
      by reference in the
      registration statement (No. 333-144016) on Form S-8 and
      the
      registration statement (No. 333-138010) on
      Form S-3
      of
      Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC of
      our
      report dated February 27, 2008, with respect to the
      consolidated balance sheets of IMTT Holdings, Inc. as
      of
      December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of
      income, shareholders’ equity, comprehensive income and
      cash
      flows for the years then ended, which report appears in the Form 10-K of
      Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC.




Our
      report for the year ended Decemebr 31, 2007,
      refers to the Company's adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board No.
      158
*Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
      Plans - an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and
      132(R)*.




/s/
                KPMG LLP






New
      Orleans, Louisiana


February
      27, 2008
##### 



Citizens Effingham Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
 Exhibit 31.1
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Citizens Effingham Bancshares, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report.3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and I
have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared.b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent
fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business
issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Harry H. ShearouseHarry H. ShearousePresident and Chief Executive Officer and Principle Financial Officer
#### Matter of the Heather Children.

*Rabeas Corpus*— Infants.

Guardianship of a minor’s estate gives no right to the custody of its person in Michigan

Issue of the writ of habeas corpus to give to their guardian the custody of minor children less than fourteen years old, is not a matter of right where it does not clearly appear that it would be for the interest of the children.

Habeas Corpus.

Petition submitted and denied Apr. 10.

*Ga/rdMer K. Grout*for the application.

Per Curiam.

Application for a writ of habeas corpus to obtain possession of the bodies of Mary A. and Celia A. Heather, who are minors under the age of fourteen years. The petition shows that the father of the minors deceased some years since in Minnesota; that petitioner and the mother of the minors were thereupon appointed in that state joint guardians; that the mother subsequently died; that the minors are now in the possession and custody of a sister of their mother, living at Saginaw, in this State, who claims that they were given to her by their mother; that petitioner since the mother’s death, has been appointed sole guardian in Minnesota, and has also been appointed guardian in Saginaw county in this State; and he therefore asks that the custody of the minors be delivered to him.

The Court, on inspection of the papers, found that the *262guardianship under the Saginaw letters was of the estate only, not of the persons; and it was therefore held that no right was shown by petitioner to custody of the minors in this State. But the Court further held that in any such case the granting of this writ is not a matter of right; and there should be a more complete showing of the facts than is made in this petition, in order that it may be seen whether the interest of the minors requires that their custody should be changed.