67446 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 219 / Thursday, November 13, 2014 / Notices 

Cottonwood Cove and Katherine 

Landing Development Concept Plans is 

the NPS Regional Director, Pacific West 

Region. Subsequently the official 

responsible for project implementation 

and for monitoring results is the 

Superintendent, Lake Mead National 

Recreation Area. 

Dated: September 17, 2014. 

Patricia L. Neubacher, 

Acting Regional Director, Pacific West Region. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26824 Filed 11–12–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–FF–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

[NPS–NCR–WHHO–17124; PPNCWHHOA1, 

PPMPSPD1Z.YM0000] 

Notice of Meeting, Committee for the 

Preservation of the White House 

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of meeting. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given in 

accordance with the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix 1– 

16) that a meeting of the Committee for 

the Preservation of the White House will 

be held at the White House at 12:00 p.m. 

on Thursday, December 11, 2014. 

DATES: Thursday, December 11, 2014 

(Eastern). 

ADDRESSES: The White House, 1600 

Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20500. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Comments may be provided to: John 

Stanwich, Executive Secretary, 

Committee for the Preservation of the 

White House, 1100 Ohio Drive SW., 

Washington, DC 20242, (202) 619–6344. 

Before including your address, 

telephone number, email address, or 

other personal identifying information 

in your comment, you should be aware 

that your entire comment—including 

your personal identifying information— 

may be made publicly available at any 

time. While you may ask us in your 

comment to withhold your personal 

identifying information from public 

review, we cannot guarantee that we 

will be able to do so. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: It is 

expected that the meeting agenda will 

include policies, goals, and long-range 

plans. The meeting will be open, but 

subject to appointment and security 

clearance requirements. Clearance 

information, which includes full name, 

date of birth, Social Security number, 

city and state of residence, and country 

of citizenship must be received by 

December 3, 2014. Due to the present 

mail delays being experienced, 

clearance information should be faxed 

to (202) 619–6353 in order to assure 

receipt by deadline. Inquiries may be 

made by calling the Committee for the 

Preservation of the White House 

between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. weekdays at 

(202) 619–6344. Written comments may 

be sent to John Stanwich, Executive 

Secretary, Committee for the 

Preservation of the White House, 1100 

Ohio Drive SW., Washington, DC 20242. 

Dated: November 6, 2014 . 

Alma Ripps, 

Chief, Office of Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26923 Filed 11–12–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–EE–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

[NPS–NER–BOHA–17092; 

PPMPSPD1Z.YM0000] [PPNEBOHAS1] 

Boston Harbor Islands National 

Recreation Area Advisory Council 

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of meeting. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces a 

meeting of the Boston Harbor Islands 

National Recreation Area Advisory 

Council. The agenda includes a 

presentation by Cathy Stanton, 

anthropologist, lecturer, and writer who 

has been investigating the origins of the 

cottages located on Peddocks Island and 

is exploring whether this area can be 

classified as a ‘‘community’’ within the 

Boston Harbor Islands. There will also 

be a discussion about the Council’s 

mission, goals, and community outreach 

initiative, and Superintendent Giles 

Parker will give updates about park 

operations and planning efforts. 

DATES: December 10, 2014, 4:00 p.m. to 

6:00 p.m. (EASTERN). 

ADDRESSES: WilmerHale, 60 State Street, 

26th Floor Conference Room, Boston, 

MA 02109. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Giles Parker, Superintendent and 

Designated Federal Officer (DFO), 

Boston Harbor Islands National 

Recreation Area, 15 State Street, Suite 

1100, Boston, MA 02109, telephone 

(617) 223–8669, or email giles_parker@

nps.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

meeting open to the public. Those 

wishing to submit written comments 

may contact the DFO for the Boston 

Harbor Islands National Recreation Area 

Advisory Council, Giles Parker, by mail 

at National Park Service, Boston Harbor 

Islands, 15 State Street, Suite 1100, 

Boston, MA 02109, or via email giles_

parker@nps.gov. Before including your 

address, telephone number, email 

address, or other personal identifying 

information in your comment, you 

should be aware that your entire 

comment—including your personal 

identifying information—may be made 

publicly available at any time. While 

you may ask us in your comment to 

withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

The Council was appointed by the 

Director of the National Park Service 

pursuant to 16 U.S.C. 460kkk(g). The 

purpose of the Council is to advise and 

make recommendations to the Boston 

Harbor Islands Partnership with respect 

to the implementation of a management 

plan and park operations. Efforts have 

been made locally to ensure that the 

interested public is aware of the meeting 

dates. 

Dated: November 7, 2014. 

Alma Ripps, 

Chief, Office of Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26921 Filed 11–12–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–EE–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–888] 

Certain Silicon Microphone Packages 

and Products Containing Same; 

Commission Determination To Review 

in Part a Final Initial Determination; 

Schedule for Filing Written 

Submissions on the Issues Under 

Review and on Remedy, the Public 

Interest, and Bonding 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined to review 

in part the final initial determination 

(‘‘ID’’) issued by the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

finding a violation of section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 1337) (‘‘section 337’’), in the 

above-referenced investigation on 

August 29, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3115. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 219 / Thursday, November 13, 2014 / Notices 67447 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http://

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on July 26, 2013, based on a complaint 

filed by Knowles Electronics, LLC, of 

Itasca, Illinois. 78 FR 45272 (July 26, 

2013). The notice of investigation 

named GoerTek, Inc. of Weifang, China 

and GoerTek Electronics, Inc. of 

Sunnyvale, California as respondents. 

The Commission’s Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations is not a party to 

this investigation. The complaint 

alleged violations of section 337 in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

silicon microphone packages and 

products containing the same, by reason 

of infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 7,439,616 (‘‘the ‘616 

patent’’); 8,018,049 (‘‘the ‘049 patent’’); 

and 8,121,331 (‘‘the ‘331 patent’’). 

Subsequently, the investigation was 

terminated as to claims 13 and 14 of the 

‘616 patent and claim 24 of the ‘049 

patent based on the withdrawal of 

complainant’s allegations as to those 

claims. See Notice (May 16, 2014) 

(determining not to review Order No. 37 

issued on April 17, 2014). 

The final ID on violation was issued 

on August 29, 2014. The ALJ issued his 

recommended determination (‘‘RD’’) on 

remedy, the public interest and bonding 

on the same day. The ALJ found that a 

violation of section 337 has occurred in 

the importation into the United States, 

the sale for importation, or the sale 

within the United States after 

importation of certain silicon 

microphone packages and products 

containing same, by reason of 

infringement of one or more of claims 1, 

2, 8, 11–12, 15–18, and 21 of the ‘616 

patent; claims 1, 15, 16, 19, 21–23, and 

25–26 of the ‘049 patent; and claims 1, 

2, 4, 5, and 11–13 of the ‘331 patent. 

The ALJ recommended that the 

Commission issue a limited exclusion 

order directed to respondents’ accused 

products that infringe the ‘616, ‘049, 

and ‘331 patents. The ALJ did not 

recommend issuance of a cease and 

desist order against respondents. 

On October 2, 2014, complainant filed 

a post-RD statement on the public 

interest pursuant to Commission Rule 

201.50(a)(4). No responses from the 

public were received in response to the 

post-RD Commission Notice issued on 

September 3, 2014. See Notice of 

Request for Statements on the Public 

Interest (Sep. 3, 2014). 

Having examined the record in this 

investigation, including the ALJ’s final 

ID, the petitions for review, and the 

responses thereto, the Commission has 

determined to review the ID in part. In 

particular, the Commission has 

determined to review the construction 

of the ‘‘cover’’ limitation with respect to 

the ‘616 and ‘049 patent as well as 

related anticipation, obviousness, 

infringement and technical prong 

analyses. In addition, the Commission 

has determined to review infringement 

with respect to claim 8 of the ‘616 

patent. 

The parties are requested to brief their 

positions on only the following issues, 

with reference to the applicable law and 

the evidentiary record: 

(1) Please discuss whether the record 

supports or precludes the ALJ’s 

interpretation of the claim limitations 

‘‘the at least one layer of conductive 

material in the cover’’ and ‘‘conductive 

layer formed in the cover’’ in the ‘049 

and ‘616 patents, respectively. As part 

of this discussion, please address: 

(a) Whether the references to ‘‘a shield 

to protect . . . against electromagnetic 

interference’’ in claim 1 of the ‘049 

patent and ‘‘a shield against 

electromagnetic interference’’ in claims 

11 and 15 of the ‘616 patent provide 

context for interpreting the abovementioned claim limitations; and 

(b) Whether multiple layers in the 

cover are relevant in order to provide ‘‘a 

shield to protect’’ or ‘‘a shield against’’ 

electromagnetic interference. 

(2) With respect to the ‘049 and ‘661 

patents, please discuss, in light of your 

response to the Commission’s question 

pertaining to construction of claim 

limitations ‘‘the at least one layer of 

conductive material in the cover’’ and 

‘‘conductive layer formed in the cover’’ 

in the ‘049 and ‘616 patents, 

respectively, whether the record 

supports the ALJ’s findings regarding 

these limitations with respect to 

infringement, technical prong, and nonobviousness, including the evidence of 

secondary considerations of nonobviousness. 

(3) Assuming the asserted claims of 

the ‘049 patent require the presence of 

one or more additional layers in the 

cover besides ‘‘at least one layer of 

conductive material,’’ how does the 

presence of that additional material 

impact the respondents’ allegation that 

the asserted claims are obvious in light 

of Halteren and Une under KSR Int’l Co. 

v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398 (2007)? 

Please provide support and citations to 

the evidentiary record. 

In connection with the final 

disposition of this investigation, the 

Commission may (1) issue an order that 

could result in the exclusion of the 

subject articles from entry into the 

United States, and/or (2) issue one or 

more cease and desist orders that could 

result in the respondents being required 

to cease and desist from engaging in 

unfair acts in the importation and sale 

of such articles. Accordingly, the 

Commission is interested in receiving 

written submissions that address the 

form of remedy, if any, that should be 

ordered. If a party seeks exclusion of an 

article from entry into the United States 

for purposes other than entry for 

consumption, the party should so 

indicate and provide information 

establishing that activities involving 

other types of entry either are adversely 

affecting it or are likely to do so. For 

background, see Certain Devices for 

Connecting Computers via Telephone 

Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360, USITC 

Pub. No. 2843 (Dec. 1994) (Commission 

Opinion). 

If the Commission contemplates some 

form of remedy, it must consider the 

effects of that remedy upon the public 

interest. The factors the Commission 

will consider include the effect that an 

exclusion order and/or cease and desist 

orders would have on (1) the public 

health and welfare, (2) competitive 

conditions in the U.S. economy, (3) U.S. 

production of articles that are like or 

directly competitive with those that are 

subject to investigation, and (4) U.S. 

consumers. The Commission is 

therefore interested in receiving written 

submissions that address the 

aforementioned public interest factors 

in the context of this investigation. 

If the Commission orders some form 

of remedy, the U.S. Trade 

Representative, as delegated by the 

President, has 60 days to approve or 

disapprove the Commission’s action. 

See Presidential Memorandum of July 

21, 2005, 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005). 

During this period, the subject articles 

would be entitled to enter the United 

States under bond, in an amount 

determined by the Commission and 

prescribed by the Secretary of the 

Treasury. 

Written Submissions: The parties to 

the investigation are requested to file 

written submissions on the issues 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
67448 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 219 / Thursday, November 13, 2014 / Notices 

identified in this notice. Parties to the 

investigation, interested government 

agencies, and any other interested 

parties are encouraged to file written 

submissions on the issues of remedy, 

the public interest and bonding. Such 

submissions should address the 

recommended determination on 

remedy, the public interest and bonding 

issued on August 29, 2014, by the ALJ. 

Complainant is also requested to submit 

proposed remedial orders for the 

Commission’s consideration and to 

provide identification information for 

all importers of the subject articles. 

Complainant is further requested to 

provide the expiration dates of the ‘616, 

‘049, and ‘331 patents and state the 

HTSUS numbers under which the 

accused articles are imported. The 

written submissions and proposed 

remedial orders must be filed no later 

than the close of business on November 

20, 2014. Reply submissions must be 

filed no later than the close of business 

on December 1, 2014. No further 

submissions on these issues will be 

permitted unless otherwise ordered by 

the Commission. Party submissions 

should not exceed 50 pages for the main 

submissions and 25 pages for the reply 

submissions. 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document 

electronically on or before the deadlines 

stated above and submit 8 true paper 

copies to the Office of the Secretary by 

noon the next day pursuant to section 

210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to 

the investigation number (‘‘Inv. No. 

337–TA–888’’) in a prominent place on 

the cover page and/or the first page. (See 

Handbook for Electronic Filing 

Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/

secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/

handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). 

Persons with questions regarding filing 

should contact the Secretary (202–205– 

2000). 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document to the Commission in 

confidence must request confidential 

treatment. All such requests should be 

directed to the Secretary to the 

Commission and must include a full 

statement of the reasons why the 

Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents 

for which confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. A redacted nonconfidential version of the document 

must also be filed simultaneously with 

the confidential filing. All nonconfidential written submissions will be 

available for public inspection at the 

Office of the Secretary and on EDIS. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: November 06, 2014. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary for the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26804 Filed 11–12–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed 

Consent Decree Under the Clean Air 

Act 

On November 6, 2014, the Department 

of Justice lodged a proposed consent 

decree with the United States District 

Court for the Middle District of 

Louisiana in the lawsuit entitled United 

States and the Louisiana Department of 

Environmental Quality v. PCS Nitrogen 

Fertilizer, L.P., AA Sulfuric, Inc., and 

White Springs Agricultural Chemicals, 

Inc., Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-00707. 

The United States and Louisiana 

Department of Environmental Quality 

filed this lawsuit under the Clean Air 

Act and Louisiana Environmental 

Quality Act. The complaint seeks 

injunctive relief and civil penalties for 

violations of the Clean Air Act’s 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration 

requirements and related state 

requirements at sulfuric acid 

manufacturing plants owned and 

operated by the defendants, PCS 

Nitrogen Fertilizer, L.P., AA Sulfuric, 

Inc., and White Springs Agricultural 

Chemicals, Inc., in Geismar, Louisiana 

and White Springs, Florida. The consent 

decree requires the defendants to 

perform injunctive relief, pay a $ 

1,300,000 civil penalty, and perform a 

Supplemental Environmental Project at 

a nitric acid manufacturing facility 

owned and operated by PCS Nitrogen 

Fertilizer, Inc. in Geismar, Louisiana. 

The consent decree also requires PCS 

Phosphate Company, Inc. to perform 

injunctive relief at the sulfuric acid 

manufacturing facility that it owns and 

operates in Aurora, North Carolina. 

The publication of this notice opens 

a period for public comment on the 

proposed consent decree. Comments 

should be addressed to the Assistant 

Attorney General, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division, and should 

refer to United States and the Louisiana 

Department of Environmental Quality v. 

PCS Nitrogen Fertilizer, L.P. et al., D.J. 

Ref. No. 90–7–1–08209/1. All comments 

must be submitted no later than thirty 

(30) days after the publication date of 

this notice. Comments may be 

submitted either by email or by mail: 

To submit 

comments: Send them to: 

By e-mail ...... pubcomment-ees.enrd@

usdoj.gov. 

By mail ......... Assistant Attorney General 

U.S. DOJ—ENRD 

P.O. Box 7611 

Washington, D.C. 20044– 

7611. 

During the public comment period, 

the proposed consent decree may be 

examined and downloaded at this 

Justice Department Web site: http://

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_

Decrees.html. We will provide a paper 

copy of the proposed consent decree 

upon written request and payment of 

reproduction costs. Please mail your 

request and payment to: Consent Decree 

Library, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 

7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611. 

Please enclose a check or money order 

for $43.50 (25 cents per page 

reproduction cost) payable to the United 

States Treasury. For a paper copy 

without the exhibits and signature 

pages, the cost is $ 17.00. 

Maureen M. Katz, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26847 Filed 11–12–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

United States v. Media General, Inc. 

and Lin Media LLC; Proposed Final 

Judgment and Competitive Impact 

Statement 

Notice is hereby given pursuant to the 

Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 

15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h), that a proposed 

Final Judgment, Asset Preservation 

Stipulation, and Competitive Impact 

Statement have been filed with the 

United States District Court for the 

District of Columbia in United States of 

America v. Media General, Inc. and LIN 

Media LLC, Civil Action No. CV–14– 

01823. On October 30, 2014, the United 

States filed a Complaint alleging that the 

proposed acquisition by Media General, 

Inc. of LIN Media LLC would likely 

substantially lessen competition for 

broadcast television spot advertising in 

certain Designated Market Areas 

(DMAs) in the United States, in 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES