Handbook 130 – 2024 V. Examination Procedure for Price Verification

229

V. Examination Procedure for Price Verification

as adopted by

The National Conference on Weights and Measures*

A. Background

The NCWM established the Price Verification Working Group in 1993 to respond to public concern about price 

accuracy in retail stores. More than 500 retailers, consumer representatives, and state and local weights and 

measures officials participated in the development of the procedure. It was adopted by the NCWM at the 

80th Annual Meeting in 1995.

The procedure applies to all retail stores, including food, hardware, general merchandise, drug, automotive supply, 

convenience, and club or other stores. Model inspection reports are included to promote the collection of uniform 

data. The model reports and uniform procedures will serve as the foundation for the collection and summarization 

of price accuracy data on a national basis. This information may be used to provide reliable information on price 

accuracy with a national perspective. The procedure provides administrators with the tools, guidance, and 

background information, as well as uniform test procedures and enforcement practices, to enhance the economic 

well-being of consumers and retail businesses in their jurisdiction. By implementing this program in cooperation 

with industry, officials will help to restore and maintain consumer confidence in retail pricing practices and 

technologies, such as scanners, and provide economic benefits for consumers and the business community.

B. Status of Promulgation

The Examination Procedure for Price Verification was recommended for adoption by the Conference in 1995. The 

table beginning on page 6 shows the status of adoption of the procedure.

*The National Conference on Weights and Measures (NCWM) is supported by the National Institute of Standards 

and Technology (NIST) in partial implementation of its statutory responsibility for “cooperation with the states in 

securing uniformity in weights and measures laws and methods of inspection.”
IV. Uniform Regulations Handbook 130 – 2024

G. Uniform E-commerce Regulation

230

THIS PAGE INTETIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Handbook 130 – 2024 V. Examination Procedure for Price Verification

231

V. Examination Procedure for Price Verification

Table of Contents

Section 1. Scope ................................................................................................................. 233

Section 2. Definitions.......................................................................................................... 233

Section 3. Test Notes.......................................................................................................... 236

Section 4. Materials and Equipment.................................................................................. 236

Section 5. Pre-Inspection Tasks ........................................................................................ 236

Section 6. Inspection .......................................................................................................... 237
IV. Uniform Regulations Handbook 130 – 2024

G. Uniform E-commerce Regulation

232

Section 7. Test Procedures ................................................................................................ 237

Section 8. Documentation of Findings .............................................................................. 248

Section 9. Evaluation of Inspection Results ..................................................................... 249

Section 10. Accuracy Requirements.................................................................................. 250

Section 11. Enforcement Procedures................................................................................ 251

Section 12. Post-Inspection Tasks .................................................................................... 252

Section 13. Supervisory Activities..................................................................................... 253

Section 14. Model Forms for Price Verification Inspections............................................ 253
Handbook 130 – 2024 V. Examination Procedure for Price Verification

233

V. Examination Procedure for Price Verification

Section 1. Scope

These procedures may be used to conduct price verification inspections in any type of store, including those that use 

Universal Product Code (UPC) scanners and price-look-up codes at the check-out counter as a means for pricing. 

Procedures are included for test purchases and verifying manual entries. The purpose of the procedure is to ensure 

that consumers are charged the correct price for the items they purchase. The “randomized” and “stratified” 

sampling procedures are intended for use in routine inspections to determine how well a store is maintaining price 

accuracy. Nothing in this procedure should be construed or interpreted to redefine any state or local law or limit any 

jurisdiction from enforcing any law, regulation, or procedures that relates to the accuracy of advertisements of retail 

prices, or any other legal requirement.

Section 2. Definitions

2.1. Area. – “Entire store,” a “department,” “grouping of shelves or displays,” or other “section” of a store as 

defined by the inspector from which samples are selected for verification. “Non-public” areas of a store are not 

included (e.g., the area in a pharmacy where controlled drugs are kept or product store rooms).

2.2. Cents-off Representation. – Any printed matter consisting of the words “cents off” or words of similar import 

placed upon any item or on a label affixed or adjacent to an item, stating or representing by implication that it is 

offered for sale at a lower price than the ordinary and customary retail selling price (e.g., 15 % off, bonus offers, 

2 for 1, or 1-cent sales, etc.).

2.3. Direct-Store-Delivery (DSD) Item. – An item delivered to a store, and usually priced, by route salespeople 

(e.g., milk, beer, soft drinks, bread, and snack foods).

2.4. Displays.

(a) Aisle Stacks or End-of-Aisle Displays. – Displays located in freestanding units or attached at the end of or 

adjacent to a tier of shelves.

(b) Tie-in Displays. – Displays of related products at secondary locations in a store (e.g., barbecue sauce on 

shelves in an aisle that may also be simultaneously displayed in the meat department of a food store).

(c) Multiple Displays. – Displays of the same product at several locations in a store.

2.5. Hand-held Scanning Device. – A portable device that scans UPC codes and also allows for the comparison of 

the price displayed on a shelf, item, or otherwise advertised to the price for the item in the point-of-sale database.

NOTE: These devices either retain a “batch” file of entered prices and identities for later comparison to the 

database or operate “on-line” via FM radio to the database. When used for price verification, they shall only be used 

with the active point-of-sale database. If you use a hand-held scanner, verify all price discrepancies by scanning the 

item at a check-out register and request a printed receipt to document the price that consumers would be charged.

2.6. Enforcement Levels.

NOTE: These recommendations are not intended to modify the enforcement policy of any jurisdiction unless they 

are adopted by the jurisdiction.

(a) Lower levels of enforcement actions. – Includes increased inspection frequency, stop-sale or correction 

orders, warning letters, and other notifications of noncompliance.
IV. Uniform Regulations Handbook 130 – 2024

G. Uniform E-commerce Regulation

234

(b) Higher levels of enforcement actions. – Includes issuance of citations, administrative hearings, civil 

penalties, or prosecution under criminal statutes.

2.7. Inspection Types.

(a) Automated Inspection. – Inspections that are conducted using a hand-held scanning device.

(b) Manual Inspection. – Removing items from displays and taking them to a check-out terminal to verify the 

price (e.g., select the items and either (1) take them to a check-out terminal for scanning or (2) record the 

product identity, UPC number, and shelf price for each package on an inspection report) and then manually 

entering the UPC numbers in the register. The manual entries may be made by the official or by a store 

employee.

2.8. Inspection Frequency. 

These recommendations do not modify the inspection policy of any jurisdiction unless adopted by the jurisdiction.

Inspection Control. – After a program has been in place for a period of time and a database is established, 

procedures can be developed to randomly select stores for inspection, or to focus inspections on stores with low 

levels of compliance.

(a) Normal Inspection Frequency. – An inspection made at the customary time interval used by an 

enforcement agency. Inspections may be conducted during normal business hours. Stores under this 

normal frequency should be inspected semi-annually or annually.

(b) Increased Inspection Frequency. – An inspection made more often than with the customary time interval, 

usually as a follow-up on prior violations. Inspections may be conducted during the normal business hours. 

Stores under this increased frequency should be inspected on a quarterly, bi-monthly, or more frequent 

basis.

(c) Term of Increased Inspection Frequency. – A store placed on an increased inspection frequency shall 

remain at that frequency until there are two consecutive inspections with an accuracy of 98 % or higher.

(d) Special Inspection. – An inspection that is conducted as a follow-up to a prior inspection or to investigate 

a complaint.

2.9. Inspection Lot. – A group of items available for testing in an “area” or “areas.” (see 2.1. “Area.”)

2.10. Merchandise Group. – A group of products identified under a common heading for inspection purposes only 

(e.g., “advertised sale” items, “end-of-aisle” items, “direct delivery” items, “cents-off” items, or all the items in the 

“men’s” department in a department store).

2.11. Not-on-File Item. – Items not found in the point-of-sale database. When found, another item is selected at 

random (e.g., an item on either side of the one that was not on file) to replace the item in the sample. A “not-onfile” item is not an error unless you determine that the price “charged” for the item is incorrect by conducting a test 

purchase or by asking the check-out clerk to determine the price by using the store’s written or stated policy or 

procedures. If the price is found to be inconsistent, the error is included in the total.

2.12. Notification of Noncompliance. – Any written notice given to a store describing the violations of the law 

that were found.

2.13. Price Look-Up Code (PLU). – A pricing system where numbers are assigned to items or commodities, and 

the price is stored in a database for recall when the numbers are manually entered. PLU codes are used with scales, 

cash registers, and point-of-sale systems.
Handbook 130 – 2024 V. Examination Procedure for Price Verification

235

2.14. Prices. – These definitions do not amend or effect the provisions of any law, regulation, or other test 

procedure.

(a) Misrepresented Price. – The price charged differs from the price at which the item is offered, exposed, or 

advertised for sale, or that the price is different from the price on the item, shelf label, or sign.

(b) Price Charged. – The price charged for an item and either displayed on the automated device or on the 

receipt issued by the device, whether the item is scanned or actually purchased, the device is computing or 

recording while in a training or inspection mode, or by using the hand-held device tied to the point-of-sale 

database.

(c) Overcharge. – The price charged for an item is more than the lowest advertised, quoted, posted, or marked 

price.

d) Undercharge. – The price charged for an item is less than the lowest advertised, quoted, posted, or marked 

price.

(e) Intentional Undercharge. – Undercharges are not counted as errors if the store provides, at the time of 

inspection, information that confirms that the price error was intentional (e.g., an undercharge that occurs 

when a store lowers a price in a database before it changes shelf tags or signs in anticipation of selling the 

item at a lower price, or when a store increases the price or advertised price of an item, and then increases 

the price in the database, or when a discounted price is rounded to a lower value).

2.15. Pricing Coordinator. – The individual designated by the store to control and maintain “pricing integrity” in 

the store, although the title will differ among retailers.

2.16. Pricing Integrity. – Ensuring that the computer price file and/or the price charged to consumers at a cash 

register is the same price that is marked on the product, in an advertisement, and/or the shelf tag.

2.17. Sample. – The number of items selected for testing from the inspection lot.

2.18. Scanner. – An electronic system that employs a laser bar code reader to retrieve product identity, price, and 

other information stored in computer memory.

2.19. Stock-Keeping Unit (SKU). – A system of product identity and pricing similar to PLUs.

2.20. Store-Coded Item. – The application of UPC codes to items in the store. Scales in the meat, deli, and other 

departments generate UPC labels that include identity and price information that can be read by point-of-sale 

scanners.

2.21. Stop-Sale Order. – An official document placing a package or an amount of any commodity off-sale, that is 

offered or exposed for sale in violation of the law.

2.22. Ticketed Merchandise. – Items from which the price must be read from a ticket (or price sticker) and 

manually keyed into a register.

2.23. Universal Product Code (UPC). – A unique symbol that consists of a machine-readable code and humanreadable numbers. UPCs are printed on package labels or are applied with tags or labels. UPC codes may be 

printed for random weight packages by price computing scales. UPC symbols must meet the standards established 

by the GS1 US (formerly the Uniform Code Council [UCC]) in order for them to “scan” accurately. The size and 

clarity of the print and clear area surrounding the symbol are just a few of the factors that affect accuracy. The GS1 

US issues codes and answers technical questions. For more information, contact GS1 US Corporate Headquarters at 

Princeton South Corporate Center, 300 Charles Ewing Boulevard, Ewing, NJ 08648, telephone: (937) 435-3870 or 

at www.gs1us.org. 
IV. Uniform Regulations Handbook 130 – 2024

G. Uniform E-commerce Regulation

236

Section 3. Test Notes

3.1. Safety and Health. – Practice safe work habits to avoid personal injuries or property damage. Be aware of 

and follow all safety or sanitation rules at the inspection site. Handle perishable, dairy, or frozen products properly 

to avoid damage (e.g., avoid defrosting frozen foods or allowing dairy products to warm to room temperature that 

may result in spoilage).

3.2. Confidentiality of Findings. – Inspection findings should be discussed only with an authorized store 

representative and released only in accordance with applicable public records laws.

Section 4. Materials and Equipment

The following materials and equipment are recommended for use in conducting the inspections in this procedure:

Inspection report: 

• Copy of laws or regulations

• Hand-held counter or Price Verification Tally Sheets

• 1 lb (or 1 kg) test standard

• Merchandise cart (if required and available)

Other equipment and materials provided by the store when available:

• Current newspaper advertisement or store sales brochures

• Hand-held scanning device(s) – Stores are not required to have this equipment or to make it available for 

your use. However, many stores use this equipment to maintain price integrity and may make it available 

for your use on request.

Section 5. Pre-Inspection Tasks

Prior to conducting an inspection, it is recommended that you contact the store management, identify yourself, and 

explain the purpose of your visit. Determine if there are any health, sanitation, or safety rules. If requested, provide 

information on the law or the inspection procedure.

NOTE: When verifying manual price entries or conducting test purchases, store management is typically not 

notified of the test until the items have been totaled and the transaction completed.

(a) Notify store representatives that they are invited to participate in the inspection.

(b) If the store makes a hand-held scanning device available for use, request instructions on how to operate it 

properly. It is acceptable for the “pricing coordinator” to operate the scanning device and participate in the 

inspection.

(c) If you use the manual inspection procedure, advise the store representative that you will 

return the merchandise to its display location unless the store representative wants to restock the 

items, which is acceptable. Determine which check-out location to use. Arrange to have the 

register set so that the items you verify are not included in sales records.

(d) Conduct inspections in a manner that does not disrupt normal business activities.
Handbook 130 – 2024 V. Examination Procedure for Price Verification

237

Section 6. Inspection

Perform the following inspections:

6.1. Position of Equipment. – Determine if customer indications on point-of-sale systems meet NIST 

Handbook 44, General Code, User Requirement, 3.3. Position of Equipment. A device equipped with a primary 

indicating element and used in direct sales shall be so positioned that its indications may be accurately read and the 

weighing and measuring operation may be observed from some “reasonable” customer position.

NIST Handbook 44 defines “point-of-sale system” as an assembly of elements including a weighing element, 

indicating element, and a recording element (and may be equipped with a scanner) used to complete a direct sale

transaction.

NOTE: The importance of consumer access to the cash register display of product information and price cannot be 

overstated. If consumers cannot verify prices as the items are being scanned, they must wait until the transaction is 

completed (i.e., they must pay by cash, check, or credit card) before they receive the receipt and can confirm the 

prices charged for the items.

6.2. Other.

(a) If you use a cash register, verify the accuracy and legibility of information provided on register’s receipts.

(b) Conduct inspections to enforce local requirements if your jurisdiction has specific laws or regulations 

relating to price marking, shelf labels, or unit pricing. 

Section 7. Test Procedures

These procedures shall be used to conduct inspections in any type of store, whether the store uses scanners or 

automated price look-up registers, or where a clerk manually enters the prices.

7.1. Application of Sampling Plans.

(a) For normal or increased frequency inspections, follow the procedures referred to in Columns 1, 2, and 3 in 

Table 1. Samples, Sample Collection, and Accuracy Requirements.

(b) For special inspections, use the test procedures in Section 7.2. Table 1. Samples, Sample Collection, and 

Accuracy Requirements or 7.4. Procedure for Test Purchases and for Verifying Manually Entered Prices.

7.2. Table 1. Samples, Sample Collection, and Accuracy Requirements.

7.2.1. How to Use the Table:

(a) Look in Column 1 for the type of store you are inspecting; select the appropriate sample size from 

Column 2; then refer to Column 3 for the type of sample collection plan to use.

(b) Follow the single-stage or two-stage sampling plans to conduct the inspection and collect the samples 

using either the “randomized” or “stratified” sample collection procedures described in

Section 7.3. Sample Collection Procedures or the procedure in Section 7.4. Procedure for Test 

Purchases and for Verifying Manually Entered Prices.

(c) Apply the accuracy requirements for the appropriate sample size in Column 4.
IV. Uniform Regulations Handbook 130 – 2024

G. Uniform E-commerce Regulation

238

7.2.2. Samples. – Refer to Column 2 in Table 1. Samples, Sample Collection, and Accuracy Requirements to 

determine how many items to select for the store type and whether to use the single-stage or two-stage sampling 

plan. You may use either:

(a) Single-Stage Sample. – A single-stage sample is typically used for, but is not limited to, stores where 

a hand-held scanner device is available for the inspection; or

(b) Two-Stage Sample. – A two-stage sample saves time. If the sample (usually one-half the total sample 

size) taken in the first-stage meets the accuracy requirements specified in Column 4 in Table 1. 

Samples, Sample Collection, and Accuracy Requirements, the inspection is complete. However, if the 

errors in the first-stage sample fall within the limits set in Column 4, the second-stage of the sample is 

taken.

7.3. Sample Collection Procedures (for use with either manual or automated inspection procedures). – These 

sample collection procedures may be used to conduct either manual or automated inspections with a single-stage or 

two-stage sample. That is, you can either use a hand-held scanning device to verify the price of an item 

(automated), or you can remove the items from display and take them to a check-out location to verify the price of 

the item (manual) regardless of which sample collection procedure is used. No sample collection procedure is ideal 

for all retail store arrangements. You can modify the procedure to fit each store, but you should adhere to the 

sample size and sample collection procedures described in Table 1. Samples, Sample Collection, and Accuracy 

Requirements. When using any of the procedures, test the store as a whole unit by taking samples from all parts of 

the store, or divide the store into “areas” and select samples from several “areas” (e.g., at least 10 areas, or one-third 

or one-half of the “areas”).

Table 1. Samples, Sample Collection, and Accuracy Requirements

Column 1.

Type of Store

Column 2.

Samples

Column 3.

Sample Collection

Procedures

Column 4.

Accuracy Requirements

(See Section 10)

Convenience or Any 

Other Small Retail 

Store

NOTE: For this 

procedure, a small 

store is typically 

one with three or 

fewer check-out 

registers.

Two-Stage Sample:

First Stage = 25 items

Second Stage = 25 

items or more

Total = 50 items or 

more

or

Single-Stage Sample:

50 items or more

Use the Randomized 

Sample Collection in 7.3.1 

or the Stratified Sample 

Collection in 7.3.2.

and

Use Manual or Automated 

Inspection Procedures

NOTE: Test the store as a 

whole unit by taking 

samples from all “areas” of 

the store,

or

divide the store into 

“areas” and select samples 

from several “areas” (e.g., 

at least 10 or one-third of 

the “areas”)

If 1 error is found in the 25-item 

sample, test an additional 25 

items.

If more than 1 error is found in 

the 50-item sample, the store 

fails.

NOTE: If more than 1 error is 

found in the first 25 items, the 

store fails.

All Other Retail 

Stores

Two-Stage Sample:

First Stage = 50 items 

Second Stage = 50 

items or more

Total = 100 items or

more

If 1 error is found in the 50-item 

sample, the store passes.

If 2 errors are found in the 

50-item sample, test an additional 

50 items.

If more than 2 errors are found in 

the 100-item sample, the store 

fails.

NOTE: If more than 2 errors are 

found in either stage, the store 

fails.
Handbook 130 – 2024 V. Examination Procedure for Price Verification

239

Column 1.

Type of Store

Column 2.

Samples

Column 3.

Sample Collection

Procedures

Column 4.

Accuracy Requirements

(See Section 10)

Single-Stage Sample:

100 or more items

If more than 2 errors are found in 

the 100-item sample the store 

fails; or

If more than 100 items are 

sampled, the error rate shall not 

exceed 2 %.

NOTE 1: These sampling procedures allow flexibility in sample collection for use in any type or size of store. 

You can take several different approaches and select a number of “areas” to sample using the sample sizes in 

Table 1. For example, to perform a 100-item inspection in a department store with 20 “areas,” you can either 

verify 5 items in an “area,” 10 items in each of 10 “areas,” or 20 items from each of 5 “areas.”

NOTE 2: The sample sizes used for routine inspections in this procedure should not be used to estimate the 

overall accuracy of prices in a store.

NOTE 3: In some stores, price reductions are not programmed into the point-of-sale system. Instead, discounts 

are manually entered by a sales clerk; however, the sales clerks should have a means of identifying a sale item. 

When conducting normal inspections, verify the price of the sale items by allowing the sales clerk to determine 

the price of the item using the store’s customary procedures. This will ensure that the customer receives the 

correct price regardless of the location where the check-out occurs.

7.3.1. Randomized Sample Collection. – In “randomized” sample collection, all items in an “area” have an 

equal chance of being included in the sample. This test procedure has several benefits, including: (1) having 

more effective coverage and being simpler to conduct because you select items by count following a systematic 

pattern throughout the store, and (2) ensuring that a wider range of items are verified, which increases scrutiny; 

therefore, there is greater confidence in the results. With most samples, several items will be verified in each 

“area” of the store. Since store sizes differ, this number will vary, but samples should be taken from a wide 

variety of items (and merchandise groups) from locations throughout the store or “area.”

The steps of the randomized sampling collection procedure are as follows:

(a) Count the number of “areas” in the store which have products to be verified:

(1) Stand-alone counters and displays or whole departments (e.g., bakery or seafood, or “men’s 

clothing” or “sporting goods” department, etc.) are considered and counted as individual “areas” 

to be sampled.

(2) End of aisle displays may be considered as a single, distinct “area” and either verified separately 

or included as part of one side of an aisle.

(b) The sample size (e.g., 100 items) is divided by the number of “areas” to determine the number of items 

to be sampled from each “area.” Depending on the number of areas in the store, you may calculate a 

fractional number of items per area. In this case, round off the sample size and select one or two 

additional items from an “area” to complete the full sample size of 100 items.

7.3.1.1. Example 1. Illustrations of the Randomized Sampling Procedure.

(a) Figure 1 illustrates how the randomized sampling procedures are used in a food store. This 

example is based on a 100-item sample. To simplify the selection process, simply divide the store 

into 4 major “areas” and select samples as follows:
IV. Uniform Regulations Handbook 130 – 2024

G. Uniform E-commerce Regulation

240

Examples:

• Select 5 items from all of the shelves and displays in the produce section which are 

grouped as a single “area,”

• Select 85 items by choosing 5 items from either side of several of the 13 aisles (e.g., 

there are 26 rows of shelves from which samples may be selected. To select 85 items, 

select 5 items from 17 of the 26 rows of shelves).

• Select 5 items from the counters along the back of the store, and

• Select 5 items from the deli-bakery and the cash register areas which are grouped as a 

single “area.”

(b) Figures 2 and 3 illustrate how the randomized sampling procedures may be used in any store. The 

examples are based on a 100-item sample for stores that have a total of 30 “areas” to sample. The 

procedure allows the flexibility needed to adjust the sample to fit the store layout. To simplify the 

selection process, the stand-alone displays may be grouped together as an “area” to be sampled.

The following breakdown of “areas” is illustrated in Figure 2; the same approach is used in Figure

3. Figure 4 illustrates an example of sampling 100 items by selecting 20 items from 5 different 

areas in a department store.

 1 - All shelves and displays in the produce section are grouped as a single “area.”

28- The 13 aisles (26 rows of shelves), the counters along the back of the store, and the cash 

register areas are counted as “areas.”

 1 - The “end-of-aisle” displays at the front and back of the store are grouped as a single 

“area.”

30 - Total “areas”

(1) To select samples from the entire store, divide 100 by 30 to calculate how many “samples” to 

take from each “area.” In this example, 100 ÷ 30 = 3.3 items per area. Rounding down to 3

items, take a total of 90 samples from the different “areas,” then select an additional one (1)

item from each of 10 “areas” to obtain a sample of 100 items.

(2) If you round up to 4 items per area, you take a total of 120 samples, or

(3) You may select 10 items from 10 “areas.”
Handbook 130 – 2024 V. Examination Procedure for Price Verification

241

Figure 1. Illustration of the Randomized Sampling Procedure
IV. Uniform Regulations Handbook 130 – 2024

G. Uniform E-commerce Regulation

242

Figure 2. Illustration of the Randomized Sampling Procedure

(c) Start in any “area” in the store at any shelf, rack, or display (top, bottom, front, back; anywhere on 

a circular rack or display). Begin with the first, second, or third item and count either 5, 10, or 

15 items along the shelf (varying the number of items counted depending on how many items are 

available on the shelf) or along the aisle. Select the 5th, 10th, or 15th item as appropriate (See 

Figures 5, 6, and 7). Only select one item from each brand or product (if they are the same price) 

from a display that has two or more items of the same product size and price displayed side by 

side. You can change the number of items you count off as often as necessary during the 

inspection.

(d) Either verify the price with a hand-held scanning device or take the item (along with the other 

items you select) to the check-out location to verify the price, keeping count of the items using a 

hand counter or tally sheet. If the price of an item is incorrect, record the item’s name, 

description, and price along with other information (e.g., whether the product is on sale, aisle 

location so you can easily find the items again to verify the error, etc.).

(e) From the first item sampled, move down (or up) one shelf to the item most directly below (or 

above) and count 5, 10, or 15 items in the same direction and sample the 5th, 10th, or 15th items, as 

appropriate. After the number of items to be verified in each “area” have been selected, go to the 

next “area” and start on the next shelf (either down or up) from where the previous sample was 

selected, count 5, 10, or 15 items and select the appropriate item using the count system until the 

required number of samples is selected. If you have sampled an item on the bottom (or top) shelf 

and have more items to test in the “area,” simply go up (or down) one shelf. This will create a 

“zigzag” trail up and down the display.
Handbook 130 – 2024 V. Examination Procedure for Price Verification

243

NOTE: Randomness can be increased by starting on different shelves or at the midpoint or rear 

of an aisle during an inspection, or by starting at different locations in a store on subsequent 

inspections. Always start at a different location on subsequent inspections of a store. To maintain 

“randomness,” do not search for obvious pricing errors. If you see pricing errors, have them 

corrected. The sample should not include more than one of the same item from the same display. 

If an item is out of stock, select the next item.

(f) This procedure is repeated for all “areas” until you complete the sample. (See following Notes)

NOTE 1: Include at least 5 to 10 Price Look Up (PLU) and store-coded items in the samples. In 

food stores, these items do not usually have to be removed from the produce, bulk foods section, 

or deli display for use in this procedure. You can use a hand-held scanner or record the identity 

and item price designated at the product sales display of the items from the different department 

(produce, bakery, deli), if available, for price comparison through either the PLU programmed in 

the department’s scale or at the point-of-sale system. Have the PLU entered in the scale (See 

NOTE 2) or point-of-sale system (or have “store-coded” items scanned) and record the price, 

comparing it with the displayed sale price. Record any errors (See NOTE 3). When checking 

“store-coded” items from the meat or other departments, remember a “UPC symbol” on a random 

weight label is read by a scanner to obtain the total price and identity. The price is not stored in 

the point-of-sale database, but in the memory of the prepackaging scale.

NOTE 2: Some scales or point-of-sale systems do not display or record the unit price associated 

with the PLU unless a weight is on the scale. For this type of device, a one-pound standard (or 

1 kg) is placed on the scale load-receiving element. Some systems automatically deduct tare, so 

check to make sure that this does not affect the price indication.

NOTE 3: When you manually enter PLU codes and find errors, reenter the PLU number to ensure 

that the error was not caused by a keying mistake and that the item was identified accurately.

Figure 3. Illustration of the Randomized Sampling Procedure

7.3.2. Stratified Sample Collection. – Stratified sample collection (i.e., selecting samples from specific 

merchandise groups) of items on sale, specials, seasonal items, or items on end-of-aisle displays) is typically used 
IV. Uniform Regulations Handbook 130 – 2024

G. Uniform E-commerce Regulation

244

(e.g., if a store has failed an inspection based on the randomized sample collection procedures) to focus on specific 

merchandise groups that appear to have more errors than others (e.g., you find that many of the errors found in the 

randomized sample were in “advertised specials” or with “discontinued items”). You can also combine sample 

collection procedures by using a “randomized/stratified” approach. The “stratified” approach may be used the first 

time you inspect a store, in stores that have just implemented scanning, in stores that have high error rates on 

particular groups of items in past inspections, or in responding to consumer complaints involving a particular group 

of items.

For stratified sample collection, items are randomly selected from different “merchandise groups” in a store. They 

are tested in the first stage of the two-stage manual sampling plan to determine if (1) any group has more errors than 

any other and (2) the sample taken in the first stage meets accuracy requirements. This method should be modified 

depending on the marketing practices of the store in which it is used (e.g., if you are in a department store, there may 

be fewer groups to sample from, or the list provided below may not include the types of groups typically 

encountered in a hardware superstore). The next example shows how to conduct a stratified sample and how it is 

used, but it should not be the sole basis for sample collection because a specific list of items does not look at the 

store as a whole. Focusing on specific merchandise groups takes time, but this may be necessary when investigating 

a complaint or following up on a prior noncompliance. Select only one item from each brand or product from a 

display that has two or more items of the same product, size, and price displayed side by side if they are the same 

price.

Figure 4. Stratified Sample Collection Figure 5. Randomized Sample Collection
Handbook 130 – 2024 V. Examination Procedure for Price Verification

245

Sample Size. – In this example, a large food store is inspected using a two-stage sampling plan (50 items/100 total 

items). The inspection begins with an initial sample of 50 items (see Column 1. Type of Store for All Other Retail 

Stores and Column 2. Sample Sizes in Table 1).

Stratified Sample Collection. – Select 50 items from the merchandise groups listed below (provided as examples 

only; stores may have other groups that should be included). This procedure allows you to focus on specific 

merchandise groups to determine if errors are indeed occurring in groups where they are thought to occur most 

frequently (e.g., sale and direct delivery items).

7.3.2.1. Example 2. Two-Stage Manual Inspection using the Stratified Sampling Procedure.

If there is an insufficient number of items in any merchandise group, or if the group of items is not 

available, increase the number of “randomized” items selected from the overall inspection lot to obtain a 

total of 50 items. As marketing practices evolve, these groups may change as well. You may substitute 

“other” or new merchandise groups for any of those listed below (e.g., you may have identified errors in the 

“health and beauty aids” section or on “manager specials” during a previous inspection, so samples from 

these groups may be substituted for any of the groups listed below). Model “Price Verification Tally 

Sheets” in Section 14. Model Forms for Price Verification Inspections are provided for your use with the 

test procedures to keep track of the number of items selected.

First-Stage: 50 items. – Use the “randomized” sample collection procedures described in 7.3.1.

Randomized Sample Collection to select the following items. These sample collection procedures simplify 

the inspection process and ensure that samples are collected as randomly as possible.

Examples:

• Twenty-five “Regular Priced” items. Select one or two items at random from different shelves in 

each “area” or limit your sampling to shelves in one-half the “areas” in the store, and

• Twenty-five Items. Select a total of 25 items. Include several items from any of the following 

merchandise groups:

– “Direct-Store-Delivery (DSD)” items. If the store allows vendors to price DSD items, include 

those items in the sample.

– “End-of-Aisle” or “Tie-In-Display” items. This group can include both regular and salepriced items.

– “Advertised Sale” items. Use the store’s sales brochure or newspaper advertisements to 

identify sale items.

– “Special” items. This includes any item with a reduced price (e.g., items on “special” 

including “cents-off” or “percentage-off” items, 2-for-the-price-of-1 specials, manager and instore specials, or discontinued items). Items typically discounted on a percentage basis 

include a manufacturer’s product line, greeting cards, magazines, or books.

– “PLU” items. This includes both regular and sale priced items offered in the produce, bakery, 

or bulk food departments and over scales at the direct sale counters. For direct service

departments (e.g., produce, deli, specialty meats, etc.), select products at random (include 

some sale or special prices) and enter the code in the scale [see Section 7.3.2.1. NOTE 1] to verify that 

the coded price matches the advertised price. [see Section 7.3.2.1. NOTE 2]

– “Store-coded” items. This includes items offered in the produce, bakery, or meat departments 

that have labels with the UPC symbol generated by scales and printers in the store. For storecoded items, scan the item and determine if the total price and identity on the label are 

accurately read by the point-of-sale system. When checking “store-coded” items from the 
IV. Uniform Regulations Handbook 130 – 2024

G. Uniform E-commerce Regulation

246

meat or other departments, remember that a “UPC symbol” on a random weight label is read 

by a scanner to obtain the total price and identity. The price is not stored in the point-of-sale 

database.

– “Other” items. This category is included to provide flexibility in selecting a sample so that 

“seasonal” items, or products unique to the store or local market, can be included. Both 

regular and sale-priced items can be included in this category.

NOTE 1: Some scales or point-of-sale systems do not display or record the unit price associated with the 

PLU unless weight is on the scale. For these devices, a 1 lb (or 1 kg) standard is placed on the scale loadreceiving element. Some systems automatically deduct tare, so make sure this does not affect the price 

indication.

NOTE 2: When a not-on-file item is found, another item is selected at random to replace it in the sample. 

A “not-on-file” item is not an error unless you determine (e.g., by conducting a test purchase or by asking 

the check-out clerk to determine the price of the item using the store’s customary procedures) that the price 

“charged” for the item is incorrect. If the price determined is not correct, the error is included in the total.

 

Figure 6. Randomized Sample Collection
Handbook 130 – 2024 V. Examination Procedure for Price Verification

247

Figure 7. Randomized Sample Collection

Identify the item on an inspection report (e.g., record a brief description, item number, shelf, or advertised 

price and aisle location. The aisle location makes it easy to find the product if errors are found and to reshelve the items). As items are selected, use the “Price Verification Tally Sheet,” or other means, to keep 

track of the number of items collected. (see Section 14. Model Forms for Price Verification Inspections. 

The “Model Price Verification Reports” in this proposal were developed with the assumption that it is only 

necessary to record information of items found with price errors, not all items verified. This reduces 

paperwork and saves time.) Either use a hand-held scanning device or take the items to a cash register, 

verify the prices by scanning the items or entering a PLU code into the register and printing a receipt. The 

prices “charged” at the register are then compared to the advertised price of each item. For large or 

perishable items, record the identity, UPC Code, location, and price and manually enter the UPC number 

into the register to verify the price. However, this method is subject to recording and key entry errors.

Evaluation of Results on First-Stage.

See Section 9. Evaluation and Inspection Results for guidance on which errors are considered violations: 

One error in a 50-item sample is permitted. If not more than one error is found and verified, the store 

passes; if 3 items are found in error in the first 50 items, the store fails and the inspection is complete.

If two errors are found, collect 50 more items using the randomized sampling procedures and verify a total 

of 100 items. If errors were found in any specific merchandise group (or groups) of items (e.g., directstore-delivery items, PLU codes, or specials), the additional 50 items should include items from those 

merchandise groups.

Accuracy.

Refer to Column 4 in Table 1. Samples, Sample Collection, and Accuracy Requirements. The required 

accuracy is 98 % on the 100-item sample (that is, at most two errors are permitted on a 100-item sample). 

If more than two errors are found and verified, the store does not meet the accuracy requirement.
IV. Uniform Regulations Handbook 130 – 2024

G. Uniform E-commerce Regulation

248

NOTE: The “randomized” and “stratified” sample collection procedures in this section are intended for 

use in routine inspections to determine how a store is maintaining price accuracy on all of the items it offers 

for sale. If you use these sampling procedures in routine inspections and uncover a significant number of 

errors in a particular merchandise group (e.g., a significant number of the pricing errors are found with 

“advertised sale item” items), a randomized sample can be collected entirely within this specific 

merchandise group. For example, if the error rate for “advertised specials” is higher than the rate for 

regular priced items, a more focused inquiry to determine if there is a significant error rate in this 

merchandise group may be justified. If several “advertised specials” have been the subject of consumer 

complaints, or if they are repeatedly found to be in error during routine inspections, then a randomized 

sample can be limited to the “advertised specials” merchandise group. In this case, a randomized sample 

(e.g., a 50/100 item two-stage approach) is taken from all of the “advertised sale items” offered for sale in 

the store or in a specific “area.” The results of this sample are applicable only to the “advertised specials” 

group and not to all items in the store.

7.4. Procedures for Test Purchases, Investigation of Consumer Complaints, and for Verification of Manually 

Entered Prices.

7.4.1. Procedure. – This procedure may be used to (1) investigate consumer complaints, (2) determine if a 

store has corrected a pricing error after being notified that an error occurred, or (3) determine if manually 

keyed-in prices or PLU codes are accurate.

NOTE: When verifying manual price entries, store management is typically not notified of the test until the 

items have been totaled and the transaction completed.

(a) Do not alert the clerk to the fact that the test purchase procedure is being conducted. Do not ask 

questions concerning any errors that you observe or offer any information if asked the price of an item, 

in cases where the item price is illegible, or where the item is not on file.

(b) Use the “randomized” sampling procedures to select a sample of 10 to 50 items that includes regular 

and sale priced items, PLU items, and advertised specials from various “areas.” It is acceptable to 

purchase only one or just a few items if you are investigating a complaint on a specific item. Record 

the name and identity of the product, as well as the labeled or advertised price, for each item.

(c) Proceed through a check-out as if you were a customer and pay for the purchase. Obtain the original 

sales receipt, and compare the price charged with the labeled or advertised price for each item. Record 

the time of day, lane number, and the identity of the checker. Before leaving the store, determine if 

any errors have occurred. Identify yourself and inform the store management that a test purchase was 

conducted, and report the results. (In many instances, the store will credit back all of the items and 

refund the test purchase money.) Record the information on the test report form and determine the 

cause of the error (e.g., operator error, mislabeling, or incorrect price sign).

7.4.2. Alternative Procedure - Consumer Complaints. – Complaints can be investigated by using any of the 

test procedures described above or by verifying only the price of the item or items subject to the complaint. If 

the complaint is valid, you can limit your inspection to the items described in the complaint or you may conduct 

a complete inspection.

7.4.3. Evaluation of Results. – The errors for items verified using these procedures should be evaluated 

according to Section 9. Evaluation of Inspection Results and Section 10. Accuracy Requirements. 

Section 8. Documentation of Findings

Several examples of Model Price Verification Reports are contained in pages 233 to 238. These forms were 

developed so that you only have to record the items found with price errors.
Handbook 130 – 2024 V. Examination Procedure for Price Verification

249

Record errors and provide information on the cause, if determined. Indicate if the errors are considered to be 

violations, if stop-sale orders were issued, or if the violation was corrected.

Notices of violations or other significant comments (e.g., warnings or violations ordered corrected) should always be 

included on the test form.

Cash register receipts on verified items should be retained and attached to the inspection report as evidence.

Printed advertisements and sales flyers should be retained and attached to the inspection report when errors are 

found in these categories.

Section 9. Evaluation of Inspection Results

9.1. Definition of Errors. –An error found to result from any of the following causes should not be considered a 

violation for enforcement purposes:

An intentional undercharge if documentation or confirmation of the date and time of the price change is provided at 

the time of the inspection.

An error caused by a mistake made in any kind of advertisement (e.g., newspaper, printed brochure, or radio or 

television advertisement) if the store has placed a notice adjacent to the item indicating that a mistake occurred in 

the advertisement.

An error obviously caused by a price label that is missing or that has fallen off the shelf, or the item or the price 

label or sign has obviously been relocated by an unauthorized person.

A “not-on-file” item is not an error unless you determine that the price “charged” for the item is incorrect (e.g., by 

conducting a test purchase or by asking the check-out clerk to determine the price of the item using the store’s 

documented or customary procedures. If the price determined is incorrect, it is considered an error.)

NOTE: It is recommended that you work with the store representative to identify the cause of any error and note 

the problem/cause on the report. This may not change your findings, but will help to identify problems related to 

staff errors, failure to follow through on established store pricing procedures, data entry errors, or failure of 

management to provide correct written data, etc. The supporting information will help with enforcement decisions 

as well as in-house monitoring of product pricing.

9.2. Computing Sample Errors. – The following formulas are used to determine sample error and the overcharge 

to undercharge ratio:

(a) Adjust the total sample by subtracting any items or errors specified in Section 9.1. Definition of Errors. 

(b) To compute the sample error, divide the number of errors by the total sample size to obtain the error in 

percent.

For example: 

a sample of 100 items is verified; 3 overcharges and 1 undercharge are found for a total of 4 errors:

4 ÷ 100 = 4 % sample error.

(c) To compute the ratio of overcharges to undercharges (used on large samples and in follow-up activities), 

total the overcharges/undercharges and compare the numbers:

3 overcharges/1 undercharge = a 3 to 1 ratio.
IV. Uniform Regulations Handbook 130 – 2024

G. Uniform E-commerce Regulation

250

Section 10. Accuracy Requirements

10.1. Accuracy Requirements. – Accuracy information, based on a percentage of errors found in a sample and the 

ratio of overcharges to undercharges, constitutes useful criteria for evaluating the “pricing integrity” of the store. 

Both overcharges and undercharges should be considered as errors in taking lower level enforcement actions since 

(1) either type of error misrepresents the price of the item; and (2) the occurrence of any error in a randomized 

sample may indicate poor pricing practices that would result in errors where additional items were sampled. For 

higher levels of enforcement only overcharges are considered.

10.2. Accuracy. – The accuracy requirement for a sample must be 98 % or higher to “pass” a single inspection. 

See Column 4, Accuracy Requirements, in Table 1. Samples, Sample Collection, and Accuracy Requirements. 

10.3. Ratio of Overcharges to Undercharges. – With large sample sizes, overcharges should not exceed the 

undercharges. A high rate of overcharges to undercharges (2 to 1, or 3 to 1) may indicate systematic problems with 

a store’s pricing practices.

NOTE: As the history of store compliance develops, the number of overcharges and undercharges may be 

evaluated to determine if systematic errors or other problems exist. This ratio should be maintained when at least 

10 errors are found over several inspections, or in a single large sample size (e.g., the results of several 100-item 

inspections collected over a period of time or if 1000 items are sampled in one inspection.)

Table 2. Price Errors

NOTE: Random pricing errors are to be expected, but the ratio of overcharges to undercharges will rarely be 

exactly 1 to 1 (e.g., of 10 errors, 5 overcharges and 5 undercharges); the ratio will likely vary both ways over several 

inspections. If a store has more overcharges than undercharges (e.g., 2 to 1, or 3 to 1), it may indicate that the store 

is not following good pricing practices, but enough errors must be present in order to make this determination. 

(Consider the example of 12 pricing errors consisting of 8 overcharges and 4 undercharges: the ratio of overcharges 

to undercharges is 2 to 1. Similarly, 10 pricing errors consisting of 6 overcharges and 4 undercharges correspond to 

a ratio of 1.5 to 1; since all decimal values are truncated to whole numbers, 1.5 is truncated to 1, and the ratio 

becomes 1 to 1.)

The one-to-one ratio should be applied to any sample size if at least 10 errors are present. For example, if 1000

items are verified and 10 items are found in error, the sample has an accuracy of 99 %. However, if 9 of the 10

errors are overcharges (i.e., a ratio of 9 overcharges to 1 undercharge), the store should be considered to have poor 

(This table shows the percentage of errors in different sample sizes)

Percentage of Errors- Sample Size

No. of

Errors 25 50 100 150 200 300

1 4 % 2 % 1 % 0.67 % 0.50 % 0.33 %

2 8 % 4 % 2 % 1.33 % 1.00 % 0.67 %

3 12 % 6 % 3 % 2.00 % 1.50 % 1.00 %

4 16 % 8 % 4 % 2.67 % 2.00 % 1.33 %

5 20 % 10 % 5 % 3.33 % 2.50 % 1.67 %

6 24 % 12 % 6 % 4.00 % 3.00 % 2.00 %

7 28 % 14 % 7 % 4.67 % 3.50 % 2.33 %

8 32 % 16 % 8 % 5.33 % 4.00 % 2.67 %

9 36 % 18 % 9 % 6.00 % 4.50 % 3.00 %

10 40 % 20 % 10 % 6.67 % 5.00 % 3.33 %
Handbook 130 – 2024 V. Examination Procedure for Price Verification

251

pricing practices or other problems; if 100 items are verified and a 90 % accuracy is found, 10 items in error not 

meeting the overcharge to undercharge ratio can be used in enforcement action as evidence of poor pricing practices.

Section 11. Enforcement Procedures

11.1. Enforcement Steps.

(a) Compliance is based on the accuracy found on a sample collected according to this procedure.

(b) Errors should be corrected immediately, or if the correction cannot be made immediately, a stop-sale order 

shall be issued before you leave the business. If the errors are not corrected in your presence, a follow-up 

inspection may be made later in the day or the following day to ensure the store has corrected the error. If a 

store fails to correct the error by that time, higher level enforcement action should be taken.

(c) Enforcement action for large monetary errors on individual items, confirmed overcharges on items verified 

in response to complaints, or errors found on follow-up inspection of items ordered corrected, should be 

taken independently from any sample, giving consideration to the magnitude of the violation, corrective 

action by the establishment, and any other relevant information. Action may be initiated at any time in the 

inspection process based on the facts of the individual case.

(d) Overcharges and undercharges are used to determine lower levels of enforcement actions, but higher levels 

of enforcement action (e.g., fines or penalties) are taken only on the overcharges found in the sample.

(Amended 2001)

NOTE: Many computer systems do not allow for the immediate correction of errors in the database. 

Downloading information throughout the day may not be possible. Therefore, for the purposes of this 

section, “immediate” correction of errors may entail the removal or correction of problem signs, manually 

changing marked prices, or communicating notice of the corrected price to all applicable stores through 

facsimile, e-mail, or any other appropriate medium to ensure that consumers are charged the correct price.

11.2. Model Enforcement Levels.

These recommendations do not modify the enforcement policy of any jurisdiction unless adopted by that 

jurisdiction.

(a) Ninety-Eight Percent or Higher. – If price accuracy is 98 % or higher on a sample of 50 or more items, 

and if overcharges do not exceed undercharges on sample sizes of 100 or more items, and the store is on a 

normal inspection frequency:

(1) a notice of noncompliance is issued on violations, and the store is maintained on a normal inspection 

frequency; or

(2) if the store is on increased inspection frequency, it remains on this frequency until inspection results 

conform to Terms of Increased Inspection Frequency.

(b) Less Than Ninety-Eight Percent. – If price accuracy is less than 98 % on a sample of 50 or more items 

and if overcharges do not exceed undercharges on large sample sizes, and the store is on normal inspection 

frequency:

(1) A notice of noncompliance is issued and the store is placed on an increased inspection frequency.

(2) A second inspection should be conducted within 30 business days. If the price accuracy then is not 98

% or higher, a warning is issued.
IV. Uniform Regulations Handbook 130 – 2024

G. Uniform E-commerce Regulation

252

(3) A third inspection should be made within 60 business days. If the price accuracy is again less than 98

%, higher level enforcement action should be taken.

(Amended 2001)

If the store is on increased inspection frequency, a warning should be issued and the store re-inspected within 

30 business days. If price accuracy is less than 98 %, higher levels of enforcement action should be taken.

(Amended 2001)

Examples: 

For the 100-item sample size:

• If 100 items are verified and three overcharges are found in the sample, the error rate is 3 %. In this 

example, higher levels of enforcement action should be taken.

• If 100 items are verified and three overcharges and two undercharges are found, the error rate on the 

sample is 5 %, but overcharges are 3 %. In this example, higher levels of enforcement action should be 

taken.

• If 100 items are verified and two overcharges and three undercharges are found, the error rate is still 5 %, 

but overcharges are only 2 % of the sample. In this example, a lower level enforcement action would be 

taken.

(c) Terms of Increased Inspection Frequency. – When a store is on increased inspection frequency, it shall 

remain at that frequency until two consecutive inspections reveal an accuracy of 98 % or higher.

(d) Higher Levels of Enforcement Action. – Overcharges and undercharges are used to determine lower 

levels of enforcement actions, but higher levels of enforcement action (e.g., fines or penalties) are taken 

only on overcharges. A store’s history of error rates, the time it takes a store to correct the errors, the 

difference in inaccuracy rates found between “regular” and “sale” priced items, the ratio of overcharges to 

undercharges, a record of valid consumer complaints, and the magnitude of the error(s) may be used to 

support enforcement action.

Section 12. Post-Inspection Tasks

(a) You should meet with the store representative to review your findings. Have the inspection report 

completed prior to the meeting and be prepared to briefly summarize your findings and recommended 

actions, and provide a copy to the store representative.

(b) Return borrowed safety, sanitation, and/or test equipment.

(c) If you removed items from display, ensure that the items are returned to their proper location on the store 

shelves unless the representative requests to have the items returned by a store employee, which is 

permitted.

(d) Advise the representative of your findings. Explain any violations and errors. Explain any orders issued 

and be sure the individual acknowledges understanding of what corrective action is expected, if any.

(e) If necessary, describe the implications of the inspection results and advise the store of the action that you 

intend to take. If an increased inspection frequency is called for due to the accuracy level found during the 

inspection, advise the firm that re-inspections will be made, but do not indicate when they may occur.
Handbook 130 – 2024 V. Examination Procedure for Price Verification

253

Section 13. Supervisory Activities

13.1. Baseline Surveys. – Price verification programs require management support so that the program’s objectives 

and desired benefits can be incorporated into the enforcement agency’s work plans and budget. Surveys to measure 

pre- and post-implementation accuracy should be used to establish a base from which to measure whether a 

cost/benefit has been obtained.

13.2. Follow-up Inspections. – Inspections that reveal errors exceeding the accuracy requirements recommended 

above must include follow-up action to ensure that the store fulfills its obligations regarding accurate prices.

13.3. Management Information Systems. – To ensure adequate control and follow-up, a database should be 

established in each jurisdiction to provide information on every store, including:

For stores:

• store name

• address

• telephone

• type of store

• frequency of inspection

• sample size

• accuracy

• number of overcharges

• dollar value of overcharges

• number of undercharges

• dollar value of undercharges

• average money value of undercharges

• ratio of overcharges to undercharges

For program review:

• total number of undercharges

• total dollar value of undercharges

• average dollar value of undercharges

• percent undercharges of total

• ratio of overcharges to undercharges

• total error in percent

• accuracy levels of stores

• store type

• total stores tested

• total stores tested (each type)

• total items tested

• total number of overcharges

• total dollar value of overcharges

• average dollar value of overcharges

• percent of overcharges of total

Section 14. Model Forms for Price Verification Inspections

These models can be used to develop formal report forms, or they can be copied and used as worksheets for 

conducting inspections:

(a) Sample Tally Sheets: These forms can help you keep track of the number of items verified. They provide 

spaces to record the item’s display location (e.g., aisle or department), a description of the item, and the 

shelf or advertised price. The worksheets are set up for the stratified sample collection described above to 

help identify the types of products to select.

(1) Price Verification Tally Sheet – Food Stores. (See page 255.)

(2) Price Verification Tally Sheet – Department Stores. (See page 256.)

(b) Model Inspection Form I: This can be used to document violations and record findings. A completed 

sample is provided.

(1) Price Verification Report I – sample blank form. (See page 257.)

(2) Price Verification Report I – completed sample form. (See page 258.)

(c) Model Inspection Form II: This can be used in stores where a hand-held scanning device is not available, 

or when it is inconvenient to take items (e.g., a large ladder in a hardware store) to a check-out register to 

verify the price. You can record an identity, the UPC or PLU code, and advertised price so that you can 
IV. Uniform Regulations Handbook 130 – 2024

G. Uniform E-commerce Regulation

254

manually enter the codes to verify the price. The form can also be used to record findings. A completed 

sample is provided.

(1) Price Verification Report II – sample blank form. (See page 259.)

(2) Price Verification Report II – completed sample form. (See page 260.) 
Handbook 130 – 2024 V. Examination Procedure for Price Verification

255

Price Verification Tally Sheet – Food Stores 

“End of Aisle”

or

“Tie-In Display”

Item Location UPC/Identity Shelf Price

1. 1. 1. 1.

2. 2. 2. 2.

3. 3. 3. 3.

4. 4. 4. 4.

5. 5. 5. 5.

“PLU or Coded”

Items

6. 6. 6. 6.

7. 7. 7. 7.

8. 8. 8. 8.

9. 9. 9. 9.

10. 10. 10. 10.

“Advertised 

Sales”

Items

11. 11. 11. 11.

12. 12. 12. 12.

13. 13. 13. 13.

14. 14. 14. 14.

15. 15. 15. 15.

16. 16. 16. 16.

17. 17. 17. 17.

18. 18. 18. 18.

19. 19. 19. 19.

20. 20. 20. 20.

Items on

“Special”

21. 21. 21. 21.

22. 22. 22. 22.

23. 23. 23. 23.

24. 24. 24. 24.

25. 25. 25. 25.

“Direct Store

Delivery”

Items

26. 26. 26. 26.

27. 27. 27. 27.

28. 28. 28. 28.

29. 29. 29. 29.

30. 30. 30. 30.

“Randomly 

Selected”

Items

31. 31. 31. 31.

32. 32. 32. 32.

33. 33. 33. 33.

34. 34. 34. 34.

35. 35. 35. 35.

36. 36. 36. 36.

37. 37. 37. 37.

38. 38. 38. 38.

39. 39. 39. 39.

40. 40. 40. 40.

41. 41. 41. 41.

42. 42. 42. 42.

43. 43. 43. 43.

44. 44. 44. 44.

45. 45. 45. 45.

46. 46. 46. 46.

47. 47. 47. 47.

48. 48. 48. 48.

49. 49. 49. 49.

50. 50. 50. 50.
IV. Uniform Regulations Handbook 130 – 2024

G. Uniform E-commerce Regulation

256

Price Verification Tally Sheet – Department Stores

“End of Aisle” or “Tie-In 

Display”

Identity Location Advertised

1. 1. 1.

2. 2. 2.

3. 3. 3.

4. 4. 4.

5. 5. 5.

“Advertised Sale Items”

6. 6. 6.

7. 7. 7.

8. 8. 8.

9. 9. 9.

10. 10. 10.

11. 11. 11.

12. 12. 12.

13. 13. 13.

14. 14. 14.

15. 15. 15.

Items on “Special”

16. 16. 16.

17. 17. 17.

18. 18. 18.

19. 19. 19.

20. 20. 20.

21. 21. 21.

22. 22. 22.

23. 23. 23.

24. 24. 24.

25. 25. 25.

“Randomly Selected”

Items

26. 26. 26.

27. 27. 27.

28. 28. 28.

29. 29. 29.

30. 30. 30.

31. 31. 31.

32. 32. 32.

33. 33. 33.

34. 34. 34.

35. 35. 35.

36. 36. 36.

37. 37. 37.

38. 38. 38.

39. 39. 39.

40. 40. 40.

41. 41. 41.

42. 42. 42.

43. 43. 43.

44. 44. 44.

45. 45. 45.

46. 46. 46.

47. 47. 47.

48. 48. 48.

49. 49. 49.

50. 50. 50.
Handbook 130 – 2024 V. Examination Procedure for Price Verification

257

Price Verification Report I

Page ___ of ___

Inspection: 1st  2nd  3rd Frequency:  Normal  Increased Type:  Stratified  Automated 

Randomized Complaint: 

Location of Test

(Store Name, Address, County, ZIP Code):

Date: Telephone:

Manager: Type of Store:

Identity, Brand Name, Item or 

Style Number

Number of Items, Size, 

Location in Store, or UPC Code

Offered 

Price

Price

Charged Error (±)

1.

 Stop Sale Issued

 Corrected

Comments:

2.

 Stop Sale Issued 

 Corrected

Comments:

3.

 Stop Sale Issued 

 Corrected

Comments:

4.

 Stop Sale Issued 

 Corrected

Comments:

5.

 Stop Sale Issued 

 Corrected

Comments:

6.

 Stop Sale Issued 

 Corrected

Comments:

7.

 Stop Sale Issued 

 Corrected

Comments:

8.

 Stop Sale Issued

 Corrected

Comments:

Inspection Results:

_____ (Sample Count) - _____ (#Not on File) = _____ (Adjusted Sample Count [ASC])

_____ (#Errors) ÷ _____ (ASC) =_____ (Error Percentage)

(Accuracy Percentage) = _____ %

Overcharges/Undercharges Ratio = ____:____

Inspector Name: __________________________________

Report Acknowledgement:

Name/Title: __________________________________

Comments/Remarks: ___________________________

____________________________________________

Time In: ________________ Time Out: ___________ 

Comments/Remarks: _______________________________

_________________________________________________
IV. Uniform Regulations Handbook 130 – 2024

G. Uniform E-commerce Regulation

258

Price Verification Report I (completed sample)

Page 1 of 1 

Inspection: [√]1st  2nd 3rd Frequency: [√] Normal  Increased Type: [√] Stratified  Automated Randomized

Complaint: 

Location of Test (Store Name, Address, County, ZIP Code)

Barkers Food Store

Belle, New Jersey 31756

Date: Telephone:

Manager: Type of Store:

Identity, Brand Name, Item or 

Style Number

Number of Items, Size,

Location in Store, or UPC Code

Offered 

Price

Price 

Charged Error (±)

1. Smith Cake Mix

32 oz, 313461346177 3.19 4.19 + 1.00

 Stop Sale Issued 

[√] Corrected Comments: Sale sign not removed

2. Natural Fruit Juice 1 Liter, 617369345619 2.25 2.75 + .50

 Stop Sale Issued 

[√] Corrected

Comments:

3. Carks Soap 8oz, 936125376558 1.19 1.00 − 0.19

 Stop Sale Issued 

[√] Corrected

Comments:

4.

 Stop Sale Issued 

 Corrected

Comments:

5.

 Stop Sale Issued 

 Corrected

Comments:

6.

 Stop Sale Issued 

 Corrected

Comments:

7.

 Stop Sale Issued 

 Corrected

Comments:

8.

 Stop Sale Issued

 Corrected

Comments:

Inspection Results

 100 (Sample Count) - 0 (#Not on File) = 100 (Adjusted Sample Count [ASC])

 3 (#Errors) ÷ 100 (ASC) = 3 (Error Percentage)

(Accuracy Percentage) = 97 % Overcharges/Undercharges Ratio = 2:1 

Inspector Name: T. Price Report Acknowledgement:

Time In: 8:15 Time Out: 9:30 Name/Title: Chris Barker

Comments/Remarks: _______________________________ Comments/Remarks: 
Handbook 130 – 2024 V. Examination Procedure for Price Verification

259

Price Verification Report II

Page ___ of ___

Inspection:  1st  2nd  3rd Frequency:  Normal  Increased Complaint: 

Location of Test:

(Store Name, Address, County, ZIP Code)

Date: Telephone:

Manager: Type of Store:

Item/Size or Style Number

Offered

Price

Price

Charged

Price

Error (±)

Item, Brand, Description, 

Code/Size

Offered

Price

Price

Charged

Price

Error (±)

1. Identity: 11. Identity:

 UPC/PLU: UPC/PLU:

 Comments: Comments:

2. Identity: 12. Identity:

 UPC/PLU: UPC/PLU:

 Comments: Comments:

3. Identity: 13. Identity:

 UPC/PLU: UPC/PLU:

 Comments: Comments:

4. Identity: 14. Identity:

 UPC/PLU: UPC/PLU:

 Comments: Comments:

5. Identity: 15. Identity:

 UPC/PLU: UPC/PLU:

 Comments: Comments:

6. Identity: 16. Identity:

 UPC/PLU: UPC/PLU:

 Comments: Comments:

7. Identity: 17. Identity:

 UPC/PLU: UPC/PLU:

 Comments: Comments:

8. Identity: 18. Identity:

 UPC/PLU: UPC/PLU:

 Comments: Comments:

9. Identity: 19. Identity:

 UPC/PLU: UPC/PLU:

 Comments: Comments:

10. Identity: 20. Identity:

 UPC/PLU: UPC/PLU:

 Comments: Comments:

Inspection Results:

_____ (Sample Count) - _____ (#Not on File) = _____ (Adjusted Sample Count [ASC]) Stop-Sale Order Issued? [ ]

_____ (#Errors) ÷ _____ (ASC) =_____ (Error Percentage)

(Accuracy Percentage) = _____ % Overcharges/Undercharges Ratio = _____:_____

Inspector Name: ___________________________________ Report Acknowledgement:

Time In: Time Out: Name/Title: 

Comments/Remarks: Comments/Remarks: 
IV. Uniform Regulations Handbook 130 – 2024

G. Uniform E-commerce Regulation

260

Price Verification Report II (completed sample) 

Page 1 of 1 

Inspection: [√] 1st  2nd  3rd Frequency: [√] Normal  Increased Complaint: 

Location of Test: (Store Name, Address, County, 

ZIP Code)

Mark Downtown Department Store

11650 Main Street

Alice, MN 61619

Date: 

3/16/95

Telephone:

(614) 555-6146

Manager: Jim Chester Type of Store:

Department Store

Item, Size, or Style Number

Offere

d Price

Price

Charged

Price

Error

(±)

Item, Brand, Description, 

Code, Size

Offered

Price

Price

Charged

Price

Error

(±)

1. Identity: Sony Color TV 11. Identity:

UPC/PLU: 38569 UPC/PLU:

Comments: Model 6136X 189.00 199.00 + 10.00 Comments:

2. Identity: Moore Lawn 

Mower

12. Identity:

UPC/PLU: 31619 UPC/PLU:

Comments: Shp with bagger 96.00 91.00 − 5.00 Comments:

3. Identity: Taft Rake 13. Identity:

UPC/PLU: 39916 UPC/PLU:

Comments: Not on file 8.99 Comments:

4. Identity: Calendar 14. Identity:

UPC/PLU: 615191 UPC/PLU:

Comments: 5.50 7.10 + 1.60 Comments:

5. Identity: 15. Identity:

UPC/PLU: UPC/PLU:

Comments: Comments:

6. Identity: 16. Identity:

UPC/PLU: UPC/PLU:

Comments: Comments:

7. Identity: 17. Identity:

UPC/PLU: UPC/PLU:

Comments: Comments:

8. Identity: 18. Identity:

UPC/PLU: UPC/PLU:

Comments: Comments:

9. Identity: 19. Identity:

UPC/PLU: UPC/PLU:

Comments: Comments:

10. Identity: 20. Identity:

UPC/PLU: UPC/PLU:

Comments: Comments:

Inspection Results:

 50 (Sample Count) - 1 (# Not on File) = 49 (Adjusted Sample Count [ASC]) Stop-Sale Order Issued? 

 3 (#Errors) ÷ 49 (ASC) = 6 (Error Percentage)

(Accuracy Percentage) = 94 % Overcharges/Undercharges Ratio = 2:1 

Inspector Name: Tim Marlowe 

Time In: 10:25 AM Time Out: 4:45 PM 

Report Acknowledgement:

Name/Title: Jim Chester, Manager 

Comments/Remarks: 

______________________________________________________

Comments/Remarks: 
Handbook 130 – 2024 VI. NCWM Policy, Interpretations, and Guidelines

261

VI. NCWM Policy, Interpretations, and Guidelines

Excerpts from NCWM Publication 3 

Table of Contents

2.1.4. Offenses and Penalties, Sale of an Incorrect Device. ........................................ 263

2.1.5. Weight: Primary Mill Paper. ................................................................................ 263

2.2.13. Declaration of Identity: Consumer Package (UPLR) and 1.5.1. In Combination 

with Other Foods (UMSCR). .......................................................................................... 264

2.2.14. Typewriter and Computer Printer Ribbons and Tapes....................................... 265

2.3.1. Instant Concentrated Products............................................................................ 265

2.3.2. Fresh Fruits and Vegetables................................................................................ 266

2.3.3. Cardboard Cartons............................................................................................... 267

2.3.4. Catalyst Beads...................................................................................................... 268

2.3.5. Incense.................................................................................................................. 268

2.3.6. Sea shells.............................................................................................................. 269

2.3.7. Tire Tread Rubber Products. ............................................................................... 269

2.3.8. Wiper Blades......................................................................................................... 269

2.3.13. Vegetable Oil......................................................................................................... 269

2.3.15. Bulk Sales. ............................................................................................................ 270

2.5.6. Guidelines for NCWM Resolution of Requests for Recognition of Moisture Loss 

in Other Packaged Products. ........................................................................................ 271

2.6.1. Retail Gas Sales and Metric Price Computations in General............................. 274

2.6.2. Price Posting......................................................................................................... 274

2.6.3. Octane Posting Regulations. ............................................................................... 275

2.6.4. Multi-Tier Pricing: Motor Fuel Deliveries (Computing Pumps or Dispensers). 277

2.6.5. Cereal Grains and Oil Seeds................................................................................ 277

2.6.6. Basic Engine Fuels, Petroleum Products, and Lubricants Laboratory............. 278

2.6.7. Product Conformance Statements. ..................................................................... 278

2.6.8. Commodities Under FTC Jurisdiction under the Fair Packaging and Labeling 

Act (FPLA) and Exclusions............................................................................................ 279

2.6.10. Model Guidelines for the Administrative Review Process................................. 286

2.6.11. Good Quantity Control Practices. ....................................................................... 288

2.6.12. Point-of-Pack Inspection Guidelines................................................................... 289

2.6.13. Guideline for Verifying the Labeled Basis Weight of Communication and Other 

Paper............................................................................................................................... 291
VI. NCWM Policy, Interpretations, and Guidelines Handbook 130 – 2024 

262

2.6.14. Labeling Guidelines for Chamois........................................................................ 296

2.6.15. Labeling Guidelines for Natural and Synthetic Sponges................................... 298

2.6.16. Minimum Fuel Flush for Octane Verification. ..................................................... 302