alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NICE Community Coordinating Council

Meeting Agenda

July 27, 2022 | 3:30-5:00 p.m. ET

BlueJeans: https://primetime.bluejeans.com/a2m/live-event/dpqyhydw

Dial In: +1 (800) 520- 9950 | PIN 1675270 #

I. Introduction and Ground Rules – NICE Program Manager Susana Barraza

II. Opening Remarks

a. Academic Co-Chair - Marni Baker-Stein, Chief Academic Officer and Provost, Western 

Governors University

b. Government Co-Chair – Marian Merritt, Deputy Director of NICE

III. Standing Items

a. Report Roundup – Learning from Good Ideas 

2022 (ISC)2 Cybersecurity Hiring Managers Guide

Presented by Tara Wisniewski, EVP Advocacy, Global Markets, and Member 

Engagement, (ISC) 2

URL: https://www.isc2.org/research

b. Strategy Stories – New Developments that align to NICE Strategic Plan 

120-Day Cybersecurity Apprenticeship Spring

Presented by Kimberly Hauge, Office of Apprenticeship, Department of Labor

URL: https://www.apprenticeship.gov/cybersecurity-apprenticeship-sprint

c. Framework Feature – Applications and Uses of Workforce Framework for Cybersecurity 

The Hiring Manager Role in Successful Cyber Apprenticeships

Presented by Alan Berry, Centene Corporation

d. Research Review- Driving Research on Effective Practices 

2021 Social Engineering Event

Presented by Dr. Aunshul Rege, Temple University

URL: https://sites.temple.edu/socialengineering/

IV. Working Group Updates

a. Promote Career Discovery

Co-chair: Keith Davis, Koinonia Family Life, Inc.

b. Transform Learning Process

Co-chairs: Richard Spires, Learning Tree; Dr. Donna Schaeffer, Marymount University

c. Modernize Talent Management

Co-chairs: Kevin Perry, United States Army; Dr. Melissa Woo, Michigan State University

V. Community of Interest Updates
a. Apprenticeships in Cybersecurity

Co-chair: Debbie McLeod, McLeod Information Systems

b. Cybersecurity Skills Competitions

Co-chair: Amelia Phillips, Highline College

c. K12 Cybersecurity Education

Co-chair: Thomas Trevethan, Palo Alto Networks

d. NICE Framework Users 

Karen Wetzel, Manager of the NICE Framework

VI. Project Progress Reports

a. NICE K12 Cybersecurity Education Conference (Virtual) – December 5-6, 2022

Presented by Felicia Rateliff

URL: https://www.k12cybersecurityconference.org/

b. NICE Conference and Expo (Seattle, Washington) – June 5-7, 2023

Presented by Randy Pestana, Florida International University

URL: https://niceconference.org/

a. US Cyber Games 

Presented by Brad Wolfenden, Katzcy

URL: https://www.uscybergames.com/

VII. Featured Topic

Measuring Cybersecurity Workforce Capabilities: Defining a Proficiency Scale for the NICE 

Framework

Presented by Karen Wetzel, Manager of the NICE Framework, National Initiative for 

Cybersecurity Education

URL: https://www.nist.gov/itl/applied-cybersecurity/nice/nice-framework-resource-center

VIII. Closing Remarks and Next Meeting Reminder

The next NICE Council Meeting will be September 28, 2022, at 3:30 p.m. ET.
EXHIBIT 31.3
 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
 CERTIFICATIONS FOR QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q/A
 
 I, Ed C. Loughry, Jr., certify that:
 
 1) I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Cavalry Bancorp, Inc.;
 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
   
 Date: August 12, 2003
by:Ed C. Loughry, Jr.Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001049129
<NAME>                        HLM DESIGN, INC
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1,920,361
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   6,602,638
<ALLOWANCES>                                      150,000
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               14,532,265
<PP&E>                                          2,747,621
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,001,170
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 19,691,056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10,867,801
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                            2,075
<OTHER-SE>                                      6,911,094    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   19,691,056
<SALES>                                         8,134,122
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                8,134,122
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   7,576,993
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      835
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                203,990
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   352,304
<INCOME-TAX>                                      160,682
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               191,622
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   280,849
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (89,227)      
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.13    
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.13  
        


</TABLE>
#### William Jouett, etc., *v.*Poplar Mountain Company. S. J. Hunter *v.*Poplar Mountain Company.

Eminent Domain — Construction of Railroad — Right-of-way—Entry with Knowledge of Landowner — Trespass.

The action of trespass cannot be maintained against a railroad for its right-of-way where the entry on the land was made while the owners were living on it and no objections being made thereto,

APPEAL FROM CLINTON CIRCUIT COURT.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

Affirmed on appeal of Jouett, etc., and reversed as to S. G. and S. J. Hunter on the cross-appeal of appellee.

These three cases were tried together in the court below and a verdict rendered for the plaintiffs in each case. The plaintiffs in the court below are the appellants in this court. These were actions of trespass instituted by the appellants against the appellee for constructing without right and against the consent of the appellant a railroad in and over their respective lands. The instructions asked for by either party will not be considered by this court unless it appears that objections were made to the giving of the instructions in the court below, an exception taken upon the refusal to instruct not being deemed sufficient. It is difficult to perceive how the action of trespass could be maintained by either party upon the facts proven.

The entry upon the land was made with the knowledge and consent of the parties in possession at the time the road was constructed by the company, and as is shown in the two actions *642of S. G. Hunter and S. J. Hunter, the railroad company entered upon the lands by the consent and under a written agreement with S. G. Hunter while he was in possession and held the legal title.

*Joseph E. Hays, for appellants.*

*Winfrey & Winfrey, for appellee.*

The appellants were living upon the land at the time, and made no objection whatever to the construction of the road, but on the contrary the proof shows that they were assenting to it.

The appellees pray a cross-appeal in the two cases of S. G. and S. J. Hunter only. The case as to the appellant, William Jouett, is affirmed and the case as to S. J. and S. G. Hunter reversed upon the cross-appeal, and for further proceedings thereon as to them not inconsistent with this opinion.
#### Joseph Kipp PITNER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND FOR THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 99 AND 99A, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 04-1254.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 1, 2004.

Decided Dec. 28, 2004.

Louis Fireison, Darin L. Rumer, Louis Fireison *&*Associates, PA, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellant. Kelly J. Davidson, David L. Cole, Jr., Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Kipp Pitner appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. We have reviewed the record, the parties’ briefs, and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Pitner v. Health & Welfare Fund for Int’l Union of Operating Engr’s Local 99 & 99A,*No. CA-02-2385AW (D.Md. Jan. 22, 2004). We grant Appellee’s motion to submit the case on the briefs as the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3(No. 333-127730) of Tower Group, Inc. of our reports dated February 17,2006 with respect to the consolidated financial statements, management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of TowerGroup, Inc. and subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ JOHNSON LAMBERT &CO.

Reston, VirginiaMarch 10,  2006

----
IV

House Calendar No. 234

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 511

[Report No. 105–652]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 629) to grant the consent of the Congress to the Texas

Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Compact.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 28, 1998

Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 629) to grant the consent

of the Congress to the Texas Low-Level Radioactive

Waste Disposal Compact.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 629) to grant the consent of the

4 Congress to the Texas Low-Level Radioactive Waste Dis-
2

HRES 511 RH

1 posal Compact. All points of order against the conference

2 report and against its consideration are waived.

House Calendar No. 234

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 511

[Report No. 105–652]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference reLevel Radioactive Waste Disposal Compact. the consent of the Congress to the Texas Low- port to accompany the bill (H.R. 629) to grant

JULY 28, 1998

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 17, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

136329 Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. FARM BUREAU GENE RAL INSURANCE Stephen J. Markman, COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, J ustices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 136329 COA: 280556 Genesee CC: 07-085474-CK D&H MARKET, INC., MI CHAEL L. KAMMO, STEVEN L. KAMMO, and GARBIEL DUNSON, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 19, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0910 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 17, 2008

Clerk
#### STATE v. LEGRANDE

No. 215A96

Case below: Stanly County Superior Court

Motion by defendant (LeGrande) to dismiss capital appeal denied 23 July 1997.
Exhibit 21.1
 Subsidiaries of Tower Group, Inc.Jurisdiction of
    
    
    
    PercentageName
    
    Incorporation
    
    Parent
    
    OwnershipTower Insurance Company of New York (TICNY)
    
    New York
    
    Tower Group, Inc.
    
    
    100
    %(TGI)Tower Risk Management Corp.
    
    New York
    
    TGI
    
    
    100
    %Tower National Insurance Company
    
    Commonwealth of Massachusetts
    
    TGI
    
    
    100
    %Preserver Group, Inc. (PGI)
    
    New Jersey
    
    TGI
    
    
    62.6
    %TICNY
    
    
    37.4
    %Preserver Insurance Company
    
    New Jersey
    
    PGI
    
    
    100
    %Mountain Valley Indemnity Company
    
    New Hampshire
    
    PGI
    
    
    100
    %North East Insurance Company (NEIC)
    
    Maine
    
    PGI
    
    
    100
    %North Atlantic Underwriters, Inc.
    
    Maine
    
    NEIC
    
    
    100
    %Ocean II Corporation
    
    Delaware
    
    TGI
    
    
    100
    %Ocean I Corporation
    
    Delaware
    
    Ocean II Corp.
    
    
    100
    %CastlePoint Bermuda Holdings, Ltd. (CPBH)
    
    Bermuda
    
    Ocean I Corp.
    
    
    100
    %CastlePoint Reinsurance Company, Ltd. (CPRe)
    
    Bermuda
    
    CPBH
    
    
    100
    %CastlePoint Management Corp. (CPM)
    
    Delaware
    
    Ocean I Corp.
    
    
    100
    %CastlePoint Risk Management of Florida, Corp. (f/k/a
    
    Florida
    
    CPM
    
    
    100
    %AequiCap CP Services Group, Inc.)CastlePoint Insurance Company (CPIC)
    
    New York
    
    CPRe
    
    
    50
    %CPM
    
    
    50
    %CastlePoint Florida Insurance Company
    
    Florida
    
    CPIC
    
    
    100
    %HIG, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    CPRe
    
    
    100
    %Hermitage Insurance Company (HIC)
    
    New York
    
    HIG, Inc.
    
    
    100
    %Kodiak Insurance Company
    
    New Jersey
    
    HIC
    
    
    100
    %American Resources Insurance Consultants, LLC
    
    Alabama
    
    HIG, Inc.
    
    
    100
    %Specialty Underwriters Alliance, Inc. (SUA)
    
    Delaware
    
    TGI
    
    
    100
    %CastlePoint National Insurance Company (f/k/a
    
    Illinois
    
    SUA
    
    
    100
    %SUA Insurance Company)SUA Insurance Services, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    SUA
    
    
    100
    %
TORBIO ALVARADO,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-4012

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 1, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Lafayette County.

Darren K. Jackson, Judge.

Torbio Alvarado, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kathryn Lane, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 371

Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the

House

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 26, 1998

Mr. ARMEY submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating majority membership on certain standing

committees of the House

1 Resolved, That the following named Member be, and

2 that he is hereby, elected to the following standing com3 mittee of the House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: Mr. Graham of

5 South Carolina.

Æ
#### George Marx et al. v. Alexander H. Woodruff.

*Replevin for cattle taken damage feasant.*

Replevin for cattle taken damage feasant and impounded can only be brought, in Michigan, under Comp. L. cli. 214.

Where defendant in replevin for impounded cattle does not dispute title, but only claims a lien, he is not entitled, on failure of tlie action in replevin, to any larger recovery besides his costs.

Error to Wayne. (Chambers, J.)

April 12.

April 18.

Replevin. Defendant brings error.

Reversed.

*Stewart & Galloway*for appellant.

*Chas. R. Ford*for appellee.

Cooley, J.

Replevin for a cow. The suit was instituted under the general replevin law. It sufficiently appeared, as we think, that the cow was distrained by the defendant damage feasant, and that the plaintiffs had knowledge of *362tlie fact when they sued out the writ. It was decided in *Campau v. Konan,*39 Mich. 362, that replevin under such circumstances could only be brought under chapter 214 of the Compiled Laws, which makes special provision for such cases. We adhere to this decision, and the judgment, which was given for the plaintiffs in the circuit court, must be set aside, with costs, and a new trial awarded. The court should have dismissed the case.

We think, however, that as the defendant did not dispute the title of the plaintiffs, but only claimed a lien of six dollars, he would not be entitled, on the suit failing, to any larger recovery besides his costs. This intimation of opinion ought to save further litigation.

The other Justices concurred.
Exhibit 10.16

Execution Version

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
(Steven L. Ortiz)

THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is entered into as of December 26, 2007 by and between TEXAS ROADHOUSE, INC., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), and STEVEN L. ORTIZ, a resident of the State of Texas ("Executive").

RECITALS

A.
The Executive is currently the Chief Operating Officer of the Company.

B.
The Company desires to continue the employment of Executive, and Executive wishes such employment as Chief Operating Officer of the Company, to be governed by the terms and conditions
set forth in this Agreement.

AGREEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the respective agreements of the Company and Executive set forth below, the Company and Executive,
intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:



---





Date

Amount VestingJanuary 7, 2009

43,750 sharesJanuary 7, 2010

43,750 sharesJanuary 7, 2011

43,750 sharesJanuary 7, 2012

43,750 shares


2

---





3

---





4

---





5

---





6

---







7

---







8

---





9

---





10

---





*
* * * *

[Remainder of this page intentionally left blank.]

11

---



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Executive and the Company have executed this Agreement on this 14th day of January, 2008.

| | TEXAS ROADHOUSE, INC.
| | ---------------------
| | By:                  
| | STEVEN L. ORTIZ      
| | /s/ Steven L. Ortiz  
| |                      

12

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONFURNISHED PURSUANT TO**

 

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

** SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Pliant Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas C.Spielberger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)             The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)             The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ THOMAS C.  SPIELBERGER |
|--------|----------------------------|
|   | Thomas C. Spielberger      |
|   | *Chief  Financial Officer* |
|   |                       |
|   | August 14, 2008       |

 

----
EXHIBIT
32.2



CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADDED BY

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, as the Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | 1. | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | 2. | To
    my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



| | /s/
    Joel Klein             
| | -------------------------------
| | Joel
    Klein                 
| | Principal
    Financial Officer
| | Date:
    July 27, 2020
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.1

Eastern Division

Jacqueline Stevens

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02725

Honorable Mary M.

Rowland

United States Department of Homeland Security,

et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, May 8, 2024:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: The Court grants

Plaintiff's unopposed motion for extension of time [78]. Plaintiff's response due 6/21/24;

Defendant's reply due 7/22/24; Plaintiff's reply to the cross−motion due on 8/5/24. Mailed

notice. (dm, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02725 Document #: 79 Filed: 05/08/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:511
Case: 3:20-cv-50249 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/06/20 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1
Case: 3:20-cv-50249 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/06/20 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:2
Case: 3:20-cv-50249 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/06/20 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:3
Case: 3:20-cv-50249 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/06/20 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:4
Case: 3:20-cv-50249 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/06/20 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:5