alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NWIRP Comments

Wanda D. Edwards, PE

Sr. Director of Technical Services

June 27, 2017
Industry Trends

 Performance based standards

 Increase in commissioning

 Federal government promoting certifications to 

provide a qualified work force

 Government and private industry beginning to 

develop the workforce of the future

 Reliability and risk based designs

 Longer design life, greater durability

 Resilience and durability
Industry Trends

 Commissioning, Continuous Commissioning

 Changing codes and standards

 Advancing inclusion of new technologies, 

products and materials in codes and standards

 Changing role of government regulation

 Advancing/changing procurement methods/design 

process for life-cycle focus
Coordination of programs

 outreach program devised to educate code 

officials on the benefits of proposals

 Tasks can be delegated( on a volunteer 

basis) to organizations to accomplish the 

program

 MOU’s with organizations to implement the 

plan



Tasks can be delegated( on a volunteer basis) 

to organizations to accomplish the program

MOU’s with organizations to implement the 

plan
Comments

 Heavy downpours – roof collapses

 Ways to promote air barriers/water barriers 

and testing of them to decrease water 

intrusion

 Utilize damage assessments teams to gather 

data and information

 Develop prescriptive solutions to go with 

performance criteria
Comments

 Develop retrofit programs for commercial 

buildings

 Develop cost data to go with changes 

whether code or standard

 Develop a way to mine data from permit 

data from inspection departments

 Wind guide similar to NEHRP would be 

beneficial
Comments

 Ways to improve workmanship – special 

inspections, commissioning, etc.

 Decreasing work force and trained 

personnel must be addressed
Resource Needs

 Develop training programs on the program 

and stakeholders can deliver training
Priorities

 Develop predictive modeling

 Develop wind guide similar to NEHRP
EXHIBIT 32.44

 

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven B. Hildebrand, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

/s/ Steven B. Hildebrand

Steven B. Hildebrand

Chief Financial Officer

August 7, 2007

 

 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. and will be retained by Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Charles E. Ramey, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of US Dataworks, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report basedon such evaluation;c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: February 14, 2006           / s/ Charles E. Ramey      Charles E. Ramey,
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                November 7, 2005 | by:    |                                                                                         |
|---------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  |   | Ed                C. Loughry, Jr.                                                            |
|                                  |   | Chairman                of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive                Officer |
#### Sarbjit SINGH, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-73443, [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 6, 2004.*

Decided Dec. 13, 2004.

*573Earle A. Sylva, Esq., Rai Law & Associates, PC, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Laguna Niguel, CA, Margaret Perry, Esq., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Sarbjit Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of his application for asylum and withholding of deportation, and from the BIA’s denial of his motion to remand to allow him to apply for protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a. Our review is confined to the BIA’s decision and the bases upon which it relied. *See Martinez-Zelaya,*841 F.2d 294, 296 (9th Cir.1988). We review for substantial evidence the adverse credibility finding, *Malhi v. INS,*386 F.3d 989, 992 (9th Cir.2003), and for abuse of discretion denial of the motion to remand, *Castillo-Perez v. INS,*212 F.3d 518, 523 (9th Cir. 2000). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that Singh was not credible because Singh’s submission of a fraudulent birth certificate undermined his credibility and his failure to prove his identity as a Sikh goes to the heart of his asylum claim. *See Malhi*at 993. Accordingly, Singh failed to establish eligibility for asylum or withholding of deportation. *Id.*

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Singh’s motion to remand to allow him to apply for CAT relief because Singh failed to present any evidence showing that it is “more likely than not” that he would be tortured if returned to India. 8 C.F.R. § 208.16(c)(2); *see also Malhi,*336 F.3d at 993.

Pursuant to *Elian v. Ashcroft,*370 F.3d 897 (9th Cir.2004) *(order),*petitioner’s voluntary departure period will begin to run upon issuance of this court’s mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Z. M. Sherley, Etc., *v.*John M. Martin, Etc.

Salvage — Shipwreck—Compensation for Assistance — Steamboat.

Where a steamboat bas been wrecked and set on fire by an explosion of its boilers, any person assisting in extinguishing the flames, thereby saving the property from total loss, is entitled to reasonable salvage.

APPEAL FROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY.

May 23, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The difficulties attending the correct adjudication of this case grew out of the conflicting character of the testimony in detail, *289A careful analysis of the statements of the various witnesses and of the circumstances attending the transaction satifies us that it is proved with a reasonable degree of certainty.

*Pope, Bradley & Sumrall, for appellant.*

*Bruce & Russell, for appellee.*

That the explosion of the boilers of the Steamer General Lytle had the effect of reducing that vessel to a complete and unmanageable wreck.

That as a further result of the said explosion said vessel was set on fire in several places.

That except for assistance rendered by third parties she would in a very short time have been entirely destroyed by said fires.

That most of the officers and a large portion of the crew of said steamer were either killed or disabled by the explosion, and that those who escaped injury were so thoroughly demoralized by the disaster that they could have made no organized effort to extinguish the fires *and save*the boat from total destruction.

That said fires were extinguished and the vessel except in so far as injured by the explosion saved to its owners through the exertions of the officers and men composing the crew of the steamer St. Charles, who rendered to the disabled craft (with the most commendable alacrity and the highest degree of spirit) all possible and necessary assistance.

That the reasonable value of the wreck so saved by the appellees was between ten and twelve thousand dollars, and that the amount adjudged to them in the way of salvage is neither unusual nor excessive. Wherefore the judgment of the Chancellor must be affirmed.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel, are you 

a 

 Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this Court’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 U.S.C.§1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on 

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

Case: 1:20-cv-03871 Document #: 3 Filed: 07/01/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:12
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONBY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I,Frederick F. Wolfe, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this report onForm 10-K of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc.;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: March14, 2007

 
| /s/ Frederick F. Wolfe   |   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|
| Frederick F.  Wolfe      |   |   |
|                     |   |   |
| Chief Executive  Officer |   |   |

 

----
Using Genetic Algorithms to Search for Failure Scenarios

Kevin Mills, James Filliben and Chris Dabrowski from NIST

We are investigating the use of genetic algorithms (GAs) to steer system models into anti-optimal behavioral directions. In this example, we demonstrate the application of our ideas to search for performance 

degradation in Koala, an IaaS (Infrastructure-as-a-Service) cloud simulator. We adopt the proportion of 

users not served as a measure of anti-fitness and use a GA to steer a population of Koala simulators, 

over 500 generations, into scenarios that maximize anti-fitness. We show that the proportion of users 

not served is > 0.50 for about 75% of the 100,000 scenarios explored. We plan to apply cluster analysis 

and other multidimensional data analysis techniques to identify causes of performance degradations.

Koala

Simulator

Distribution

 of

Anti-Fitness

Scenarios

Discovered

 by the

Genetic

Algorithm

http://www.nist.gov/itl/antd/emergent_behavior.cfm

Theory

 of

Operation

Parameter

Search

Space

6**130

Model 

Element

Parameters by Category

Structure Dynamics Failures Asymmetries Total

Users 1 29 0 4 34

Cloud 

Controller 3 23 0 2 28

Cluster

Controllers 4 14 0 1 19

Nodes 0 7 13 0 20

Intra-Net/

Inter-Net 5 12 10 2 29

Total 130

Genetic

Algorithm

Flowchart

Genetic

Algorithm

Search

Dynamics
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04176

Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama

Townstone Financial, Inc.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, October 21, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Defendant's

unopposed motion for leave to exceed page limits related to their motion to dismiss

plaintiff's complaint [18] is granted. Defendant has leave to file a memorandum up to 20

pages in support of their motion to dismiss. Mailed notice (cn).

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04176 Document #: 19 Filed: 10/21/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:63
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

CAMELBAK PRODUCTS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”,

Defendants.

Civil Action No.: 1:20-cv-03947

Judge Thomas M. Durkin

Magistrate Judge Susan E. Cox

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby files this Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal, without prejudice, as to the following Defendant(s) identified on Schedule A of the 

Complaint:

NO. DEFENDANT

177 regoldseller

186 yang-14

131 mayshi321

132 Outdoor_tops321

DATED: August 24, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt (Bar No. 6207971)

Keith Vogt, Ltd.

111 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1700

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Telephone: 312-675-6079

E-mail: keith@vogtip.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case: 1:20-cv-03947 Document #: 27 Filed: 08/24/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:4258
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document was electronically filed on August 24, 2020 with the Clerk of the Court using the 

CM/ECF system, which will automatically send an email notification of such filing to all registered 

attorneys of record.

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt

Case: 1:20-cv-03947 Document #: 27 Filed: 08/24/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:4259
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-27-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-28-2000
<CASH>                                         173,777
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,649,182
<ALLOWANCES>                                   776,277
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,205,806
<PP&E>                                       5,753,933
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,437,069
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,655,471
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,697,976
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,414
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,279,492
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,655,471
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,870,676
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,596,074
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,322,161
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             448,927
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                503,514
<INCOME-TAX>                                   266,377
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            237,137
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   237,137
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10


</TABLE>