alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 594 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 20, 1998.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House a joint resolution appointing the day for the convening of 
the first session of the One Hundred Sixth Congress. The joint resolution shall 
be considered as read for amendment. The previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the joint resolution to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the Majority 
Leader and the Minority Leader or their designees; and (2) one motion to commit.
    Sec. 2. A resolution providing that any organizational caucus or conference 
in the House of Representatives for the One Hundred Sixth Congress may begin on 
or after November 13, 1998, is hereby adopted.
    Sec. 3. A resolution providing for the printing of a revised edition of the 
Rules and Manual of the House of Representatives for the One Hundred Sixth 
Congress as a House document, and for the printing and binding of three thousand 
additional copies for the use of the House, of which nine hundred copies shall 
be bound in leather with thumb index and delivered as may be directed by the 
Parliamentarian of the House, is hereby adopted.
    Sec. 4. A resolution providing that a committee of two Members of the House 
be appointed to wait upon the President of the United States and inform him that 
the House of Representatives has completed its business of the session and is 
ready to adjourn, unless the President has some other communication to make to 
them, is hereby adopted.
    Sec. 5. The Speaker, the Majority Leader, and the Minority Leader may accept 
resignations and make appointments to commissions, boards, and committees 
following the adjournment of the second session sine die as authorized by law or 
by the House.
    Sec. 6. The chairman and ranking minority member of each standing committee 
and subcommittee may extend their remarks in the Congressional Record and 
include a summary of the work of their committee or subcommittee.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | July 1, 2011 |   | By:    | /s/ Andrew Limpert            |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   |         |   |   | Andrew Limpert                |   |
|   |         |   |   | Chief Financial Officer       |   |
|   |         |   |   | (Principal Financial Officer) |   |
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

ANNUAL MASTER SERVICER’S CERTIFICATE

 

GE DEALER FLOORPLAN MASTER NOTE TRUST

 

March 27, 2015

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of General Electric Capital Corporation (“GECC”), as the master servicer (the “MasterServicer”), pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement dated as of July 11, 2014 (as may be furtheramended and supplemented from time to time, the “Agreement”), between GECC and GE Dealer Floorplan Master NoteTrust (“Trust”), does hereby certify that:

 

1.          GECCis, as of the date hereof, Master Servicer under the Agreement.

 

2.          Theundersigned is an authorized officer who is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this certificate tothe Trust.

 

3.          Areview of the activities of Master Servicer during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the “reporting period”),and of its performance under the Agreement, has been made under my supervision.

 

4.          Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the reporting period.

 

  

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has duly executed this certificate the date first above written.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cr−00231

Honorable Susan E. Cox

Yen Cham Yung

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, June 29, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Susan E. Cox as to Yen Cham Yung: Initial

Appearance set for 6/30/2020 at 02:00 PM. before the Duty Judge is stricken. Telephone

initial appearance is set for 6/30/2020 at 2:00 p.m. before Judge Cox. Conference call in

number is (888)684−8852. Passcode is 1664086. Mailed notice (np, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
CONFIDENTIAL
  
 Separation from Employment




---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 



st
      Date:
    
    February 27, 2009
    
    
    
    /s/ Patrick J. HaveronPatrick J. Haveron




---



##### 



th
 /s/ Marie C. Pierre-PaulNotary PublicTower Group, Inc.Date: 2/27/09
    By:

/s/
Elliot S. OrolName:
    Elliot S. OrolTitle:
    SVP, General Counsel & Secretary
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL 

PROTECTION, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TOWNSTONE FINANCIAL, INC. 

and BARRY STURNER, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 1:20-cv-04176 

SEVENTH CIRCUIT RULE 3(c) DOCKETING STATEMENT

Pursuant to Seventh Circuit Rule 3(c), Plaintiff Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 

(Bureau) submits this docketing statement along with its Notice of Appeal. 

I. Jurisdiction of the District Court 

The district court had jurisdiction over this action because it was brought under federal 

law (the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1691–1691f, and an implementing 

regulation, 12 C.F.R. Part 1002; the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010, 12 U.S.C. 

§ 5536(a)(1)(A); and the Federal Debt Collection Procedure Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 3301–3308), 

presented federal questions, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and was brought by an agency of the United 

States, 28 U.S.C. § 1345. 

II. Jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals 

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has jurisdiction over this appeal under 

28 U.S.C. § 1291. The Bureau seeks review of a final judgment entered by the district court on 

February 3, 2023 (Docket No. 111). That judgment dismissed the Bureau’s complaint, thereby 

denying all relief sought by the Bureau. The Bureau files its notice of appeal concurrently with 

this Docketing Statement, on April 3, 2023. 

Case: 1:20-cv-04176 Document #: 114 Filed: 04/03/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:683
2 

III. Prior or Related Appellate Proceedings 

There are no prior or related appellate proceedings. 

IV. Additional Requirements of Circuit Rule 3(c)(1) 

This case does not involve a criminal conviction or a collateral attack on a criminal 

conviction, nor is there any prior relevant litigation in the district court that satisfies the criteria 

of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

Date: April 3, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Jacob A. Schunk 

JACOB A. SCHUNK (IA AT001908) 

Email: jacob.schunk@cfpb.gov 

Telephone: (202) 718-0394 

GREGORY W. JONES (IL ARDC #6313157) 

Email: gregory.jones@cfpb.gov 

MARY OLSON (IL ARDC #6297334) 

Email: mary.olson@cfpb.gov 

230 S. Dearborn St., Suite 1590 

Chicago, IL 60604 

and 

1700 G Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20552 

Attorneys for the Bureau of Consumer Financial 

Protection 

Case: 1:20-cv-04176 Document #: 114 Filed: 04/03/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:684
EXHIBIT 10.1.1

                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                                  CONN'S, INC.
                              AMENDED AND RESTATED
                        2003 INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION PLAN

         The Conn's, Inc. Amended and Restated 2003 Incentive Stock Option Plan
(the "Incentive Stock Option Plan") is hereby amended in the following respects
only:

                  Section 5(a) of the Incentive Stock Option Plan is hereby
         amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:

                  "(a) This Plan shall be administered by the Board or a
         Committee appointed by the Board, which Committee shall be constituted
         to comply with Applicable Laws. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the
         Chief Executive Officer of the Company shall have the ability to grant
         Options to non-executive officers of the Company under guidelines or
         formulae approved or adopted by the Committee."

                  Section 6(a) of the Incentive Stock Option Plan is hereby
         amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:

                  "(a) Options may be granted only to Employees. The maximum
         number of Shares with respect to which Options may be granted during a
         specified period to any single Employee is 2,559,767."

         The remaining provisions of the Incentive Stock Option Plan shall
remain the same and in full force and effect.
[f you need additlonal space for ANY $ection, d6esc attafi ea eddldonal sheet and reference that section,l

U.S. District Gourt for the Northern Distfict Of lllinois

Appearance Form for Pro Se Litigants

hformation entered on this form is required for any person frling a case in this court as a pro se

party (that is, without an attomey). Please PRINT hgibly.

Case Titte: Snvder. et al. v. Vidmar, , Case Number: 20 C\/ 9794

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersagned as a pro se litbant:

James Mdmar

525 Chanev Ave.

FILED Name:

Street Address:

City/StateZip:

Phone Number:

Crest Hill. lL. 60403

JUt0720zt.f

- THOMASG, BRU?ON

CIERK U.S. DlSTRlgT COU BI

815-530-1390

6t29t2021

Executed on (date)

REQUEST TO RECEIVE NOTICE THROUGH EflAIL

lf yott cfieck fie box bebu, ard provide an e-nail address in the spm protrided, you will receive notice

via email. By checking the box and provkling an e+nailaddress, under Federal Rule of Givil Procedure

5(b)2(E) yot, are waiving your d4frt to receive a paper copy of do.rnpnts fited eEcfonicatly in lhb case.

You shouH not provide an e-mail address if you do not cfieck it tequenfiy.

I request to be sent notices ftom tte oourt via e-mail. I understand that by making this request, I

am raivirB Ute nght to receive a paper copy of any elecfronically filed dmrrnent in thb case. I

understand that if my e-mail address cfianges I must prompffy notify the Court in writing.

ifuidrnar@comcast.net

E{ail Addrces (Please PRll{T legibly.)

Rev.6l23lfrl6

Case: 1:20-cv-03794 Document #: 20 Filed: 07/07/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:95
Quantitative Molecular Sensors and Imaging Techniques 

for Diagnostic Detection of Infectious Diseases

Jeeseong Hwang

jch@nist.gov

Biophysics Group

Optical Technology Division

Physics Laboratory

Bio-imaging Showcase

October 6, 2009
I. Malaria infected human red blood cells

James A. Dvorak (NIAID)

Goals: quantitative imaging of the following aspects of 

malaria infection in human red blood cells:

• Change in membrane protein components

• Hi-f component of thermal vibration of RBC

• Clustering of Band3 proteins

Fuyuki Tokumasu (NIAID) J. Cell Science (2005)
Bio-conjugated quantum dot (QD)

CdSe/ ZnS

• Attractive fluorophores for bio-imaging 

due to its broad absorption and narrow 

symmetric emission spectra

• Higher quantum yield and more 

photostable than conventional organic 

dye

• Size and composition dependent tunable 

absorption and emission pattern

• Bio-functional Coating

2 nm 8 nm

Functional Coating
2 μm

Bare

Carboxyl

Amine

Optical characterization of single QDs

bin time: 1ms

Opt. Comm. (2008)
5μm

CdSe

1μm

Imaging cellular processes with nanosensors

0 100 200

1.0

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

Normalized emission

excitation time (s)

time (s)

normalized PL

Review of Nanomedicine and Nanotechnology, in print
Microarray fabrication for high-throughput ELISA

20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0

0.5

1

1.5

2

Time (sec)

(μm)

Travel distance

Analysis of single CD4 proteins on T cell membrane

Opportunities...
Contact Information

Biophotonics for Quantitative Biophysics and Nanomedicine

Jeeseong Hwang, Biophysicist

Biophysics Group

Optical Technology Division

Physics Laboratory

NIST

Stop 8443, 100 Bureau Drive

Gaithersburg, MD 20899

301.975.4580 ph

301.975.6991 fax

http://www.physics.nist.gov/Divisions/Div844/facilities/omb/omb.html

For further details, check with posters 

by Matthew Clarke and Georgeta Crivat
Exhibit 10.15 (DIMON's 10-K March 31, 2004)



	
EXHIBIT 10.15


	
 


	
 


	
 


	
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


	
 


	
          THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”), made and entered into on the 29th day of August, 1995, to be effective as of the 1st day of
November, 1994, by and between DIMON Incorporated (the “Company”) and H. Peyton Green III (the “Executive”).


	
 


	
 


	
RECITALS:


	
 


	
 

	
	
A.

	
The Company and the Executive entered into that certain Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated December 21, 1994, which was effective as of November 1, 1994. The Company and the Executive have agreed to
modify Section 4.1 of the Agreement to reflect certain understandings between the parties with regard to the annual adjustment to the Executive’s Base Salary to reflect increases in the cost of living.


	
 

	
	
B.

	
Section 4.1 of the Agreement provides that the Executive’s Base Salary shall be adjusted effective as of November 1 of each Employment Year utilizing Consumer Price Index data for the month of September next preceding
the November 1 of the current Employment Year and for the month of September of the immediately preceding Employment Year.


	
 

	
	
C.

	
Inasmuch as the fiscal year of DIMON Incorporated begins on July 1 of each year, the parties desire that any required increase in the Executive’s Base Salary due to increases in the cost of living occur as of July 1 of
each year rather than November 1.


	
 

	
	
          NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Executive agree that Section 4.1 is hereby amended to the extent necessary to provide that for the sole purpose of computing
adjustments to the Executive’s Base Salary to reflect increases in the cost of living, such adjustments shall occur as of July 1 of each year, beginning with July 1, 1995, utilizing Consumer Price Index data for the month of May immediately preceding such July
1 and for the month of May for the immediately preceding calendar year.


	
 


	
 


	
 


	
 


	
 


	
 


	
 








	
 


	
 


	
          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement on the day and year first above written.


	
 


	
 


		
EXECUTIVE:


	
 

	
		
By:  /s/ H. Peyton Green III      (SEAL)


		
       H. Peyton Green III


	
 

	
	
 

	
	
WITNESS:

	
	
 

	
	
By:  /s/ T. Wayne Oakes

	
	
       T. Wayne Oakes

	
	
 

	
	
 

	
		
DIMON Incorporated:


	
 

	
		
By:  /s/ Claude B. Owen


		
       Claude B. Owen


		
       Chairman


	
 

	
	
 

	
	
Attest:

	
	
 

	
	
By:  /s/ John O. Hunnicutt

	
	
       John O. Hunnicutt

	
	
       Secretary/Asst. Secretary
133.8 

mm

1.5”

130 mm

60.7 mm

112 mm

1.65”

1.75” to neutron 

beam center

2.02”

88 mm

2.82”

3.01”

2.02”

There is 2 mm space between the top of IVC and top of the taper part. The center 

of sample needs to be 1.75” below the mounting flange. Maximum length is 86 

mm. Otherwise touching the IVC bottom. Active length is 19-70mm. Sample 

diameter < 70 mm (the smaller the better) with a 5/16-18 bolt less than 1/4” long 

on top of it.  We also may need to make centering jig out of nylon because the 

mounting flange wiggles a little and is NOT centered to great precision.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Camille FORD, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-7264.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 2004.

Decided Dec. 22, 2004.

Camille Ford, Appellant pro se. Laura P. Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Camille Ford seeks to appeal from the district court’s order denying her motion to reopen her previous 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); *see Reid v. Angelone,*369 F.3d 363, 368-69 (4th Cir.2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ford *269has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Ford’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 590

Recognizing and honoring Hunter Scott for his efforts to honor the memory

of the captain and crew of the U.S.S. INDIANAPOLIS and for the

outstanding example he has set for the young people of the United

States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 9, 1998

Mr. SCARBOROUGH (for himself, Mr. ARMEY, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut,

Ms. CARSON, Mrs. MINK of Hawaii, and Mr. ABERCROMBIE) submitted

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

RESOLUTION

Recognizing and honoring Hunter Scott for his efforts to

honor the memory of the captain and crew of the U.S.S.

INDIANAPOLIS and for the outstanding example he

has set for the young people of the United States.

Whereas 12-year-old Hunter Scott of Cantonment, Florida,

has received international recognition for his efforts to

honor the memory of the captain and crew of the U.S.S.

INDIANAPOLIS, which sank in the Pacific Ocean during the final days of World War II;

Whereas Hunter Scott has spent the past two years seeking

recognition for the crew of the U.S.S. INDIANAPOLIS,
2

•HRES 590 IH

many of whom perished as a result of shark attacks and

exposure after being stranded in the water for four days;

Whereas Hunter Scott’s extensive work is the subject of legislation before this Congress, supported by Democrats and

Republicans alike;

Whereas Hunter Scott’s work ethic, love of country, and

strength of character serve as a shining example to the

young people of the United States; and

Whereas Hunter Scott has helped the crew of the U.S.S. INDIANAPOLIS receive international recognition from the

New York Times, USA Today, the Associated Press,

CBS, Nickelodeon, and other print and broadcast media:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes and honors Hunter Scott for his efforts to honor

3 the memory of the captain and crew of the U.S.S. INDI4 ANAPOLIS and for the outstanding example he has set

5 for the young people of the United States.

Æ
Comments on the second draft of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework

September 29, 2022

AI Quality Management (AIQM) Research Project,

Digital Architecture Research Center,

National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)

(Correspondence to: Yutaka OIWA, Dr., y.oiwa at aist.go.jp)

Dear authors,

We are glad to see your second draft for the AI Risk Management Framework. We are 

interested in the quality management of artificial intelligence implementations.

After reading your draft, we would like to make the following comments:

1. We are waiting to see two more sections of your draft AI RMF Playbook, Measure and Manage, 

and we hope to have an opportunity to comment on those before the final publication. Those 

will be primarily related to our public activity in documenting AI quality management 

methodologies.

2. Although both AI RMF and AI RMF Playbook are intended to be used as voluntary material, 

it will be desirable that there will be some rough harmonization on suggested actions for AI 

risk management, especially those documented in materials from several different global 

regions. Without that, implementers will have difficulty deploying their products globally. 

For that purpose, we are willing to provide our AI quality management guideline as a 

possible source of information. We also appreciate comments/inputs to our guideline from 

global stakeholders, including NIST and other US public/private parties. We are also trying 

to harmonize our activity with standardization efforts in Europe and ISO/IEC.

Our guideline documents are publicly available from

https://www.digiarc.aist.go.jp/en/publication/aiqm/guideline-rev2.html .

Some of our results are also included into the current draft for ISO/IEC DTR 5469.

Best regards,

AI Quality Management (AIQM) Research Project

National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Japan