alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

K&S INVESTMENT PROPERTY ) 

GROUP, LLC., ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) No. 20-cv-2426 

 ) 

WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

NOTICE OF REMOVAL 

 NOW COMES Defendant, WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY (“herein after 

WESTFIELD”), by and through its counsel, and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1446 and 1441(a) 

states as follows in support of its Notice of Removal: 

1. On April 13, 2020, WESTFIELD acknowledged receipt of a Summons and Complaint 

for the state cause of action: 

K&S Investment Property Group, LLC v. Westfield Insurance Company, case number 

2020 CH 03358, filed on March 19, 2020, in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, 

County Department, Chancery Division (“Lawsuit”). 

 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and accurate copy of process and pleadings 

served upon WESTFIELD in the Lawsuit. 

 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and accurate copy of WESTFIELD’s 

appearance filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, which is the only document filed by 

WESTFIELD in said lawsuit. 

Case: 1:20-cv-02426 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/20/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1
4. Plaintiff’s Complaint alleges that Defendant WESTFIELD is an insurance 

company located at One Park Circle, Westfield Center, Ohio. 

5. Defendant WESTFIELD was at the time of the filing of the Complaint and 

remains a citizen of the State of Ohio. 

6. Plaintiff K&S Investment Property Group LLC is an Illinois Limited Liability 

Company incorporated in the State of Illinois, file number 05331765. Its principal executive 

office address is 1201 Kenmare Drive, Burr Ridge, Illinois 60527. Its managing member is Ivan 

Kazniyenko, 1201 Kenmare Drive, Burr Ridge, Illinois 60527. 

7. Plaintiff’s Complaint alleges damages in excess of $247,500.00 and seeks costs, 

statutory damages of $60,000.00 and attorneys’ fees. As such, Plaintiff’s damages are in excess 

of the jurisdictional limit. 

8. There is complete diversity of citizenship between the parties, thereby vesting 

subject matter jurisdiction in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). 

9. Venue lies in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1441(a). 

10. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a), WESTFIELD will promptly: 

a. File a file marked copy of the Notice of Removal with the Cook County, 

Circuit Court, Chancery Division; and 

b. Serve all parties with a file marked copy of the “Notice of Removal”. 

WHEREFORE, Defendant, WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, respectfully 

requests that this Court accept jurisdiction in this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a) and 28 

U.S.C. § 1332(a). 

Case: 1:20-cv-02426 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/20/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:2
 Respectfully submitted, 

 LEAHY, EISENBERG & FRAENKEL, LTD. 

 By: ______________________________ 

 Thomas J. Finn 

 Attorney for Westfield Insurance Co. 

Thomas J. Finn 

Leahy, Eisenberg & Fraenkel, Ltd. 

33 W. Monroe St., Suite 1100 

Chicago, IL 60603 

(312) 368-4554 

ARDC No. 6189092 

tjf@lefltd.com 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-02426 Document #: 1 Filed: 04/20/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.6.3

Eastern Division

Tamaca Bell

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03181

Honorable Sara L. Ellis

SDH Services West, LLC, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, August 5, 2022:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: Pursuant to Plaintiff's notice of

voluntary dismissal [56], the Court dismisses this case without prejudice. Civil case

terminated. Mailed notice(rj, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03181 Document #: 57 Filed: 08/05/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:783
** **

**Exhibit 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ESGRe Limited (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Joe A. Quinn, Senior Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, together with the Company's restatedfinancial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 and thequarter ended March 31, 2002, which will be filed in Forms 10-K/A and 10-Q/A:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
| /s/ Joe A. Quinn         |
|--------------------------|
| Joe A. Quinn             |
| Senior Financial Officer |
| August 19, 2002          |

 

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.35



                VORNADO CRESCENT LOGISTICS OPERATING PARTNERSHIP
                                 PARTNER CONSENT

      Please refer to that certain letter agreement, dated March 11, 1999, by
and between Vornado Operating L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("Vornado
Operating") and COPI Cold Storage L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
("Crescent Operating"), as amended, pursuant to which Vornado Crescent Logistics
Operating Partnership (the "Partnership") was formed.

      Each of Vornado Operating and Crescent Operating hereby acknowledge and
agree that it is in the best interests of the Partnership to cause AmeriCold
Logistics, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Partnership (the "Company"), to enter into the Security
Agreement (the "Agreement") and execute the Secured Promissory Note (the
"Note"), each dated as of March 11, 2002, with Vornado Operating, in the forms
attached hereto. In addition, each of the undersigned hereby authorizes any
individual holding the office of Vice-President, or any more senior office, of
either the Company or Vornado Operating to execute the Agreement and Note on
behalf of the Company, and any other instrument or agreement necessary or
appropriate to implement the same (including a UCC financing statement), and
hereby ratifies any action taken by any such individual in furtherance of the
foregoing.

Dated: November 5, 2002

                                        VORNADO OPERATING L.P.

                                        By:   Vornado Operating Company, its
                                              general partner

                                              By: /s/ Joseph Macnow
                                                  ---------------------
                                                  Name: Joseph Macnow
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer

                                        COPI COLD STORAGE L.L.C.

                                        By:   Crescent Operating, Inc., its
                                              sole member

                                              By: /s/ Jeffrey L. Stevens
                                                 -----------------------
                                                 Name: Jeffrey L. Stevens
                                                 Title: President and Chief
                                                        Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

NATELLA A. SOLOMON,

Plaintiff,

v.

NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE 

CORPORATION; EQUIFAX 

INFORMATION SERVICES LLC; 

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, 

INC. and TRANS UNION LLC,

Defendant.

Case No. 1:20-cv-02624

Honorable Steven C. Seeger

Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert

Magistrate Judge

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

NOW COMES the Plaintiff, NATELLA A. SOLOMON, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 

41(a)(1)(A)(i), hereby dismissing her claims against Defendant, EQUIFAX INFORMATION 

SERVICES LLC, with prejudice, with all parties to bear their own attorney’s fees and cost.

Dated: November 22, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

NATELLA A. SOLOMON

By: /s/ Mohammed O. Badwan

Mohammed O. Badwan

SULAIMAN LAW GROUP, LTD.

2500 South Highland Avenue

Suite 200

Lombard, Illinois 60148

+1 630-575-8181

mbadwan@sulaimanlaw.com

 

Case: 1:20-cv-02624 Document #: 47 Filed: 11/22/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:189
-- 

From: Will Carter 

To: aiframework 

Cc: Scott Deutchman 

Subject: Google Comments on AI Risk Management Framework RFI 

Date: Monday, August 30, 2021 1:40:44 PM 

Attachments: image.png 

Google Response to NIST AI Risk Management Framework RFI.pdf 

Hello, 

Please find attached Google's comments in response to NIST's request for information for the 

AI risk management framework. Please let me know if you have any questions. 

Thank you! 

Will Carter 

• William Carter

• Global Policy Lead, Responsible AI
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              51
<SECURITIES>                                   171,924
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               177,505
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 177,505
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,883
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                     172,588
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   177,505
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,004
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,285
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,281)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       938
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,219)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,219)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.51)
        

</TABLE>
#### Thos. Hutchison *v.*Sarah Akin, Etc.

Vendor and Purchaser — Reservation for Street — Contingency, Action to Enforce — ¡Necessary Allegations.

Tbe appellee took tbe strip of land subject to tbe contingency, that when Ford dedicated 25 feet of land on tbe same line to a street, sbe would dedicate tbe same quantity to tbe same purpose. It is not alleged that tbe said strip bad been appropriated to tbe street or that appellant was not in tbe possession and enjoyment of tbe land at tbe time be filed bis cross-petition; to that extent, therefore, be shows no grounds for relief.

Cemeteries — Sale of Land — Rights of Ingress and Egress — No Reservation Required.

Tbe appellant knew tbe graveyard was on tbe land when be purchased it, and, being there, tbe law, without any reservation and inhibition in tbe deed, prohibits him from removing tbe stones that mark tbe resting places of tbe dead, buried there, or injuring and removing tbe inclosure around tbe graveyard, and compels him to permit tbe relatives of those buried there to exercise tbe right of ingress and egress.

APPEAL FROM BOYLE CIRCUIT COURT.-

January 31, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

In Ford’s deed to Graham he conveys the whole tract, and the title to the strip of land 25 feet wide, on the northern boun*374dary passed to Graham, he bound himself, however, to dedicate that strip 25 feet wide, on condition that Ford dedicated a like quantity along said boundary for a street also. In like manner Graham in his deed to Mrs. Akin conveys said strip of land 25 feet wide to her, on the condition that she would dedicate the same to a street as provided for in Ford’s deed to him. It is therefore a mistake to say Mrs. Akin had no title to this strip of land; but she took it subject to the contingency that when Ford dedicated 25 feet of land on the same line to a street, she would dedicate the same quantity to the same purpose. And the appellant wholly failed to allege that said strip had been appropriated to the street or that he had not gotten the possession and was not in the enjoyment of said land at the time he filed his cross-petition. To that extent therefore he shows no grounds whatever for relief.

*James, Harding, for appellant.*

*Porter, Thompson '& Daviess, for appellees. ■*

As to the graveyard it is very evident that appellant knew it was on the land when he purchased, and being there the law without any reservation, and inhibition in the deed, prohibits him from removing the stones that mark the resting place of the dead buried there, or of injuring and removing the inclosure around the graveyard and compels him to permit the relatives of these buried there to exercise the right of ingress and egress to and from said graveyard on proper occasions and for proper purposes. 1 vol. R. S. pp. 412, 413. So that on neither of the grounds named has appellant any just cause of complaint. Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68728-68729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27178]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Computing & Communication Foundations; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:
    Name: Proposal Review Panel for Science and Technology Centers--
Integrative Partnerships (#1192) Site Visit.
    Date/Time:
December 7, 2014--6:30 p.m.-8:30 p.m.
December 8, 2014--8:00 a.m.-8:00 p.m.
December 9, 2014--8:30 a.m.-3:00 p.m.
    Place: Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
    Type of Meeting: Part Open.
    Contact Person: John Cozzens, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Room 1115, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-
8910.
    Purpose of Meeting: To assess the progress of the STC Award: 
0939370, ``Emerging Frontiers of Science of Information'', and to 
provide advise and recommendations concerning further NSF support for 
the Center.
    Agenda: CSoI Site Visit:
    Sunday, December 7, 2014.
    6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.: Closed.
    Site Team and NSF Staff meets to discuss Site Visit materials, 
review process and charge.

[[Page 68729]]

    Monday, December 8, 2014.
    8:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.: Open.
    Presentations by Awardee Institution, faculty staff and students to 
Site Team and NSF Staff; Discussions and question and answer sessions.
    1:00 p.m.--8:00 p.m.: Closed.
    Draft report on education and research activities.
    Tuesday, December 9, 2014.
    8:30 a.m.--noon: Open.
    Response to presentations by Site Team and NSF Staff Awardee 
Institution faculty staff; Discussions and question and answer 
sessions.
    Noon to 3:00 p.m.: Closed.
    Complete written site visit report with preliminary 
recommendations.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These 
matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

     Dated: November 12, 2014.
Suzanne Plimpton,
Acting, Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-27178 Filed 11-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### William WITTNER, Claimant-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-7052.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: Oct. 25, 2004.

ORDER

Pursuant to the Court’s letter dated September 27, 2004,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

This appeal is dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - RIN 0648-XD572

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability; correction.

# SUMMARY:

This action corrects a web address provided for availability of the CEMP and Implementing Guidelines, responses to comments received on the draft CEMP, and other supporting documents in a notice that published on November 7, 2014.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Korie Schaeffer, NMFS West Coast Region, 707-575-6087.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

NMFS developed the CEMP and Implementing Guidelines to establish and support a goal of protecting eelgrass habitat and its functions, including spatial coverage and density of eelgrass habitats. The CEMP includes NMFS' policy to recommend no net loss of eelgrass habitat function in California.

NMFS provided a web address to access the CEMP and Implementing Guidelines, responses to comments received on the draft CEMP, and other supporting documents. However, the web address provided is incorrect.

## Correction

                    Accordingly, in the notice published on November 7, 2014 (79 FR 66360), on page 66360, second column, in the                     **SUMMARY**                     section, the web address is corrected to read as follows:                     *http://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/​habitat/​habitat_​types/​seagrass_​info/​seagrass_​1.html.*

Dated: November 10, 2014.

Sean Corson,

Acting Deputy Director Office of Habitat Conservation, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2014-27193 Filed 11-14-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 15, 2014. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 15, 2014 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A14D0423. HUGO LACASIDON v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 89R083
EXHIBIT 32.1

                       CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pliant Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the  fiscal  quarter  ended  March  31,  2005,  as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Harold
C. Bevis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     for and as of the end of the periods covered in this Report.

/s/ Harold C. Bevis
-------------------------------------
Harold C. Bevis
Chief Executive Officer
May 10, 2005
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of LG Display Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: April 30, 2012



/s/ SANG BEOM HANSang Beom HanRepresentative Director,Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 has been provided to LG Display Co., Ltd. and will be retained by LG Display Co., Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1
                                  ------------

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2001.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Delek Resources, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB for the  period  ended  September  30,  2005,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leonard
Sternheim,  President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: November 16, 2005

                          /s/ Leonard Sternheim
                          ---------------------
                          Leonard Sternheim, President, Chief Executive Officer