alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### J. Jackson *v.*C. Pitman.

Bills and Notes — Assignment—Suit by Assignee — Instructions.

The court substantially instructed the jury that they should find for the appellant unless they believed he had induced Pitman to trade for the note by conceding that it was a good debt and agreeing he would pay it.

APPEAL FROM LAUREL CIRCUIT COURT.

June 7, 1871.

*551
      *James, for appellant.*

*Pearl, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The court substantially instructed the jury that they should find for the appellant unless they believed he had induced Pit-man to trade for the npte by conceding that it was a good debt and agreeing that he would pay it. This seems to be in accord with the principle laid down in the cases of *Smith v. Stone, 17*B. Monroe 171, and *McBrayer v. Collins,*18 B. Monroe 838. Appellant was not prejudiced by the refusal of the court to allow him to file his cross petition against Bradley, the original payee of the note.

He had no right to delay Pitman whilst he was litigating with Bradley. The verdict of the jury is not so palpably against the evidence as to authorize this court to reverse the judgment because the court below refused to grant a new trial on that ground.

Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT A 

Case: 1:20-cv-03927 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/06/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:37
Case: 1:20-cv-03927 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/06/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:38
Exhibit No. 31.1

CERTIFICATION UNDER RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR CABCO SERIES 2004-101 TRUST (GOLDMAN SACHS CAPITAL I) ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017

I, Lee Thompson, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of the periods included in the year
covered by this annual report, filed by Corporate Asset Backed Corporation, on behalf of CABCO Series 2004-101 Trust (Goldman Sachs Capital I);

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling
and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the
activities performed by the depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the
depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies
relating to the compliance by the trustee and the depositor with the minimum servicing standards or similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, as trustee.

Date: March 27, 2018



By:

/s/ Lee ThompsonName: Lee ThompsonTitle: Vice PresidentCorporate Asset Backed Corporation
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 582

Directing the Committee on the Judiciary to undertake an inquiry into whether grounds exist to impeach Kenneth W. Starr, an independent prosecutor of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 1998

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island)

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on Rules

RESOLUTION

Directing the Committee on the Judiciary to undertake an

inquiry into whether grounds exist to impeach Kenneth

W. Starr, an independent prosecutor of the United

States.

Whereas Mr. Kenneth Starr, an independent counsel of the

United States, has conducted a 4-year $40,000,000 investigation which has yielded little of substantive value;

Whereas he leaked grand jury testimony;

Whereas he intimidated witnesses;

Whereas he built a case based on tape recordings which had

been both taped illegally and tampered with; and

Whereas he provided Congress with a 1-sided report of his

4-year investigation: Now, therefore, be it
2

•HRES 582 IH

1 Resolved, That the Committee on the Judiciary is di2 rected to investigate and report to the House whether

3 grounds exist to impeach Kenneth W. Starr. Upon comple4 tion of such investigation, the Committee shall report to

5 the House its recommendations with respect thereto, in6 cluding, if the Committee so determines, a resolution of

7 impeachment.

Æ
{"id":13158,"count":1,"description":"","link":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/earth\/earth-atmosphere\/clouds\/","name":"Clouds","slug":"clouds","taxonomy":"category","parent":9424,"meta":{"redirect":"","media-tag":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/13158"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/taxonomies\/category"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/9424"}],"wp:post_type":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts?categories=13158"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/hdsnav?categories=13158"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic?categories=13158"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/gallery?categories=13158"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/reference?categories=13158"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/mission?categories=13158"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/feature?categories=13158"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press-release?categories=13158"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/stem-content?categories=13158"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/people?categories=13158"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/event?categories=13158"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/image-article?categories=13158"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/nasa-blog?categories=13158"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages?categories=13158"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/migration?categories=13158"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/podcast?categories=13158"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
UNITED STATES
 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON,  D.C.  20549
 
 FORM 10-Q/A
 (AMENDMENT NO. 1)
 
 (Mark One )
 
 x
Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2003 oro
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the Transition period from___________ to ___________ 
 Commission File Number: 0-23605
 
 
 CAVALRY BANCORP, INC.(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) 
 Tennessee
62-1721072(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer I.D. Number) 
 
 114 West College Street, Murfreesboro, Tennessee
37130(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Zip Code) 
 (615) 893-1234Registrants telephone number, including area code 
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
 
 Yesx
Noo Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2)
 
 Yesx
Noo 
 Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
 
 Common Stock Issued and Outstanding: 6,820,179 shares as of August 12, 2003.
   Explanatory Note
 
 
 This Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2003 is being filed to include the CEO and CFO certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2) and the CEO and CFO certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2) which were inadvertently filed as correspondence with the original filing of the Form 10-Q on August 8, 2003 and are therefore not viewable by the public.
 
 This Form 10-Q/A is being filed solely to correct the filing error and allow public viewing of the CEO and CFO certifications.
#### Isaac F. Camp v. Township of Algansee.

*Township treasurer*— Ditch *tones.*

Assumpsit will not lie against a township to recover hack the amount of a ditch tax levied under unlawful proceedings and paid into the hands of the township treasurer. He does not receive it for the township or as money'to he used in a township matter.

Error to Branch. (Pealer, J.)

Jan. 5.

Jan. 17.

Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

Reversed.

*L. T. N. Wilson*and *John B. Shipman*for appellant,

cited *People v. Wright*34 Mich. 371; *Catheart v. Merritt Township Treasurer*38 Mich. 243; *Midland School Districts*40 Mich. 551; *Hart Township v. Oceania County*44 Mich. 417; *Marquette v. Treasurer*49 Mich. 244.

*Loveridge & Barlow*and *Charles Upson*for appellee.

Graves, C. J.

Under color of proceedings, which were not lawful, to lay out a drain, a tax was assessed against the plaintiff which he paid under protest. He then brought this action of assumpsit to recover it back and the court entered judgment for him. The facts appear in a finding by the circuit judge and we are satisfied that the case which they present is governed by *Damson v. Township of*Aurelius, 49 Mich. 479.

The suggestion of a distinction is without force. It is said that in the case cited the money never went into the hands of the township treasurer, while in the case at bar the fact is expressly found. But the money went into the hands of that officer in point of fact as effectually in the former case as it did in this. The legal view of the transaction is that it was not a “ township matter.” An interpretation of the provisions shows that in such cases the “ treasurer ” does not receive or hold for the township, nor stand in such relation to it as to make it responsible for • his *5doings. The township conld as well be sued for a wager in the treasurer’s hands as for money obtained and held as this was, so far as appears.

The judgment must be reversed and one entered here for the defendant with the costs of both courts.

The other Justices concurred.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Yuriy Bekman, :

Appellant :

:

v. : No. 394 C.D. 2020

:

Zoning Board of Adjustment of the :

City of Pittsburgh, City of Pittsburgh :

and BDL Acquisitions :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, January 4, 2021, having considered Appellant’s application for 

reargument, the application is denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 250 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 29, 1997.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Standards of Official Conduct: Mr. Sabo, Mr. Pastor, Mr. 
Fattah, and Ms. Lofgren.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
FILED
DEC 14 2021

Uy, Li Lnine Doh Stone JUDGE IAIN D, JOHNSTON

US, Dit 4 7 te 4 e. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT LI- 7 AL
RD eni¢Ficus Hell VI CaM, AO-LV- S081.

Lh he at Ari £2-3-ad olarng L evening

here hs aacher USL A tree. a FS Mer a Volaminaus anal of tubbes
nunileons Wer 2 used and ConCussin fe cnodes, Tilo rl bfe BLACK prada

were. flced in chains. May oe bt hh Chins Prom (hich nighT ul,
Sutday dteror, Yvod Te urinate % dbecate on themselves bn

while Chained coda aS neo Slaves...

7 Qe.2, a4. = nats laker

Je Mekcy ale hesypile! io See Dy lloareag a falrerelgish dhe. fb
Me. ein an ashmalic, Manas, aan ordered He rledicalion

“Syabicort” as pot of thy Trelinent Tegienen, and. Gein the dclors
Oder Des. Over culed ond the wledicalion denied. Se ad iby Wheezing

ond breathieg become fragrersivels, Worse, this “ait 18 dotey



Nita lbe, fof even fouding nebulizer Healer is, Aid every Hime
Vere ts. Calvalede use of Perce. Me} NEVER plore whe oF? the

Verge ior fo eras X. Gas in [espe avoull. fad alle
sinmedule nse oP heces (v calealled) NEE sun Ee ealoalel

by Medical or breathing distress evel other day Gas i§ used
sone Black prigoner ond © and Subledled til...
me OO A shed Tolle

faethe i» sou) Being wdilrzedd by Molrpusz at recor from Aeling
dell Ceyplaen wise. bic) 04 placing black frisones iv FUR
Chofllzli.— ub ohh or cotton only fhteR tal fate shist, fee,
underwear, PAGER socks | at is less than 40 dearees ol night —
its Deceadber— Hore ts 2 HEAT, the Taal SE have we7”
tuned the HEAT on, and. all ALKCK fridoners are being Inrcad

& wer fafer clolles warn fAPeR SHEETS wh CLAMS if



ZI z3 FREEZE OLB fo these. Ce, wd wig Cell

neighbor (Crm im cetl FBS: he i5 in tell F3 -£10e) fiscaer Deleboie
(aret? spel (ng uakrar Nhe has Li. galion in Wii Court 28 ded) fas

{
heen in ae lee LorHes STames in 3 weeks !

Clr

TZ DEE(ae wider
| ferelff of fo I-L9 te
| BS UICL REE
SCWC-14-0000870 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
ROBERT GRINPAS and ESTHER GRINPAS, Respondent/Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellees,

vs. KAPAA 382, LLC, a Hawai # i Limited Liability Company;

Respondent/Defendant-Cross-Appellee,
KULANA PARTNERS, LLC, a Hawai # i Limited Liability Company;

Petitioner and Respondent/ Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff/Cross-Appellant, and WILLIAM R. HANCOCK, R espondent and Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

---------------------------------------------------------------- KULANA PARTNERS, LLC., Petitioner and Respondent/ Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff/Cross-Appellant,

vs. WILLIAM R. HANCOCK, Trustee of HANCOCK AND CO., INC., PROFIT SHARING TRUST under trust instrument April 3, 1993,

Respondent and Petitioner/ Third-Party Defendant/Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-14-0000870; 5CC071000132) Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0000870 27-DEC-2019 03:09 PMORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C . J . , N a k a y a m a , M c K e n n a , P o l l a c k , a n d W i l s o n , J J . )

Petitioner William R. Hancock’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on November 7, 2019, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, December 27, 2019. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 30 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 30

   Repealing rule XLIX of the Rules of the House of Representatives 
          relating to the statutory limit on the public debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 1997

   Mr. Smith of Michigan (for himself, Mr. Hoekstra, Mr. Shays, Mr. 
    Herger, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Hayworth, Mr. Saxton, Mr. 
Stearns, and Mr. Metcalf) submitted the following resolution; which was 
                   referred to the Committee on Rules

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Repealing rule XLIX of the Rules of the House of Representatives 
          relating to the statutory limit on the public debt.

    Resolved, That rule XLIX of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

DEMETRIUS JOHNSON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Case No. 20 CV 4156

v. ) 

) Judge Sara L. Ellis

REYNALDO GUEVARA, JOANNE )

HALVORSEN as PERSONAL ) Magistrate Judge Heather K. McShain

REPRESENTATIVE to the ESTATE of )

ERNEST HALVORSEN, DARRYL DALEY, )

WILLIAM ERICKSON, JOHN HEALY, and )

the CITY OF CHICAGO, )

)

Defendants. )

DEFENDANT CITY OF CHICAGO’S UNOPPOSED MOTION 

FOR LEAVE TO FILE EXCESS PAGES

Defendant, City of Chicago (the “City”), by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby 

moves this Honorable Court, pursuant to L.R. 7.1 and L.R. 56.1, for leave to file an oversized 

Reply in Further Support of Summary Judgment and oversized Daubert Replies, and in support 

thereof, states as follows:

1. Plaintiff filed a sprawling 42 page eleven-count First Amended Complaint against 

five (5) individual Defendants and the City of Chicago alleging various claims pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 and Illinois law arising out of his arrest, prosecution and conviction for the 1991

murder of Edwin Fred. 

2. The City’s summary judgment memorandum addressed all of Plaintiff’s theories of 

liability for his claims. Plaintiff’s response to the City’s summary judgment totaled 44 pages. 

Defendant City is requesting leave to file their Reply totaling 51 pages, attached as Exhibit A. 

Case: 1:20-cv-04156 Document #: 364 Filed: 08/09/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:52400
2

3. The City filed two separate Daubert motions seeking to bar Plaintiff’s experts. 

Plaintiff’s responses to the City’s Daubert motions were 40 pages for the Tiderington response, 

and 46 pages for the Steblay response. Defendant City is requesting leave to file their replies that 

will total 24 pages for Tiderington (attached as Exhibit B), and 28 pages for the Steblay response

(attached as Exhibit C). 

4. Additionally, the City was granted leave to file a motion to strike Plaintiff’s 

Statement of Disputed Facts. Defendant City is requesting leave to file a motion to strike that will 

total 21 pages. Attached as Exhibit D. 

5. This motion is not brought for purposes of harassment or undue delay.

6. Defendant City of Chicago contacted Plaintiff to determine if he opposes this 

request. Plaintiff has no objection. 

WHEREFORE, Defendant, City of Chicago, respectfully requests that this Honorable 

Court enter an order granting its motions for leave to file enlarged briefs as outlined supra and for 

any and all other relief that this Court deems just and proper.

Dated: August 9, 2024 Respectfully Submitted, 

/s/ Eileen E. Rosen

Eileen E. Rosen

Special Assistant Corporation Counsel

One of the Attorneys for City of Chicago 

Eileen E. Rosen

Catherine M. Barber

Theresa B. Carney

Austin G. Rahe

Lauren M. Ferrise

ROCK FUSCO & CONNELLY, LLC

333 W. Wacker Dr., 19th Floor

Chicago, IL 60606

(312) 494-1000

erosen@rfclaw.com

Case: 1:20-cv-04156 Document #: 364 Filed: 08/09/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:52401
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cr−00280

Honorable Andrea R. Wood

Paris Mickle, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, April 12, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood as to Paris Mickle: At the

emailed request of the parties, the Change of Plea Hearing set for 4/13/2021 is stricken

and reset for 4/29/2021 at 2:00 PM. The hearing shall proceed by video conference. To

ensure public access to court proceedings, members of the public and media may call in to

listen to remote hearings. The call−in number is (650)−479−3207 and the meeting ID is

180 813 1170##. Counsel of record will receive an email prior to the start of the hearing

with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are

reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting

of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including

removal of court−issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of

entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Without

objection, time will be excluded through and including 4/29/2021 in the interest of justice

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) to allow reasonable time for

investigation and effective pretrial preparation. Mailed notice (dal, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cr-00280 Document #: 61 Filed: 04/12/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:120
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cr−00318

Honorable Robert W. Gettleman

Olalekan Jacob Ponle

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, August 23, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman as to Olalekan Jacob

Ponle: Telephonic status hearing held on 8/23/2021. Defendant's pre−trial motions due by

10/29/2021. Telephonic status hearing set for 11/4/2021 at 9:30 a.m. By agreement, the

Court deems the period of time from 8/23/2021 through 11/4/2021 excludable under 18

U.S.C.§3161(h)(7)(A) interest of justice. Mailed notice (cn).

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cr-00318 Document #: 49 Filed: 08/23/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:186