alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>                                            5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           7,734
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,350
<PP&E>                                         646,803
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,837
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 649,050
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,675
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           248
<OTHER-SE>                                     310,431
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   649,050
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,686
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,306
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,354
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,354
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,354
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43


</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

HOWARD SCHWARTZ,

Appellant,

v.

SUNRISE LAKES CONDOMINIUM PHASE 4, INC. 3

and JUDY SCHWARTZ,

Appellees.

No. 4D22-81

[March 30, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Carol-Lisa Phillips, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

CACE18010992.

Robert J. Mansen, David Stone, Ronnie Bronstein, and Aleksandra 

Kravets of Mansfield Bronstein & Stone, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellant.

Ashley R. Tulloch and Jamie A.B. Rodriguez of Frank, Weinberg & 

Black, P.L., Plantation, for appellee Sunrise Lakes Condominium Phase 4, 

Inc. 3.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Report Out

June 10, 2016

Breakout Out Group:

In-situ Measurements

June 9-10, 2016  National Institute of Standards and Technology  Gaithersburg, MD

Roadmapping Workshop:

Measurement Science for Polymer-Based 

Additive Manufacturing
2

Desired AM Capabilities/Technologies 

• High-speed, high-resolution in-situ measurements 

• Quantitative imaging of build process at the layer level

• Optimization of molecular structure

• Automated in-process defect detection

• Real time data interpretation to support in-situ process control

• Machine learning can be applied

• Self-sensing materials, leading to self healing materials

• Build-to-build consistency

• Have a measure for online characterization defects and interfaces 

•

June 9-10, 2016  National Institute of Standards and Technology  Gaithersburg, MD

Roadmapping Workshop:

Measurement Science for Polymer-Based 

Additive Manufacturing

Breakout Group: 

In-situ Measurements
3

Top-Voted Challenges/Priority Topics

• Lack of existing real-time process measurements (spatial, 

temporal) - Develop novel measurements for real-time feedback throughout volume during printing, 

provide to close-loop control

• Lack of big data analytics for AM - Reduction to a quality measure; relate to process model predictions

• In-situ control and model integration

- Closed-loop integration of advanced sensing and model for informed control

• Lack of in-situ imaging modalities - integration to the equipment, tailorable to instrument geometry

June 9-10, 2016  National Institute of Standards and Technology  Gaithersburg, MD

Roadmapping Workshop:

Measurement Science for Polymer-Based 

Additive Manufacturing

Breakout Group: 

In-situ Measurements
Carelyn Campbell, Ursula Kattner,Yaakov Idell, MML, NIST

Tom Searles and Greg Hinson, MaterialsData Management 

Laura Bartolo, Kent State University 

Larry Berardinis and Scott Henry, ASM International 

The Structural Materials Data Demonstration Project SMDDP) is a 

cooperative research project with the NIST Materials Measurement

Laboratory (MML) that is working to create an open demonstration 

data respository for metallic structural materials. In its initial phase, 

the project is focusing on the heat treatable aluminum 6061 alloy 

and its underlying ternary system of Al-Mg-Si, incorporating diffusion,

phase equilibria, microstructural, and mechanical property data. The 

overall objective of the project is to provide a tool that the materials 

community can use to accelerate progress toward the goals of the 

Materials Genome Initative (MGI).

SMDDP consists of three phases, marked by the progressive

development of key data repository elements and access by 

increasingly larger segments of the materials digital data community.

The partners guiding the project include ASM International, NIST

MML, Granta Design Ltd. and its affiliate Materials Data 

Management Inc. (MDMI),Kent State University, and Nexight Group.

Database Structure

Granta Database is

 linked to the NIST

DSpace repository.

Mechanical 

Data

Phase Diagram Data

Data Citation 

Diffusion Data

Public release is

expected by the

 end of 2015.

Partners

ASM Structural Materials Data Demostration Project 

www.cmdnetwork.og
#### Bryan OSGAR, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 04-1685.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 30, 2004.

Decided: Jan. 5, 2005.

*897W. Daniel Mayes, Aiken, South Carolina, for Appellant.

Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, J. Strom Thurmond, Jr., United States Attorney, Marvin J. Caughman, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Deana R. Ertl-Lombardi, Regional Chief Counsel, Laura Ridgell-Boltz, Assistant Regional Counsel, Denver, Colorado, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Bryan Osgar appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and upholding the Commissioner’s denial of Osgar’s application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Osgar v. Barnhart,*No. CA-02-2552-0-18BD (D.S.C. Mar. 29, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 20, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| August 8, 2007 | /s/Richard A. Smith |  
 
Richard A. Smith

 
 
Chief Executive Officer of FelCor Lodging

 
Trust Incorporated, as general partner of

 
FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership

 

 

  |
|----------------|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Case: 1:20-cv-00512 Document #: 106 Filed: 01/08/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1695
Case: 1:20-cv-00512 Document #: 106 Filed: 01/08/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:1696
Case MDL No. 2967 Document 50 Filed 12/15/20 Page 3 of 3 

IN RE: CLEARVIEW AI, INC., 

CONSUMER PRIVACY LITIGATION 

SCHEDULE A 

Northern District of Illinois 

MUTNICK v. CLEARVIEW AI, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:20-00512 

MDL No. 2967 

HALL v. CDW GOVERNMENT LLC, ET AL., C.A. No. 1 :20-00846 

MARRON, ET AL. v. CLEARVIEW AI, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:20-02989 

Southern District of New York 

CALDERON, ET AL. v. CLEARVIEW AI, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:20-01296 21cv168

BROCCOLINO v. CLEARVIEW AI, INC., C.A. No. 1 :20-02222 21cv169

MCPHERSON v. CLEARVIEW AI, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1 :20-03053 21cv170

BURKE, ET AL. v. CLEARVIEW AI, INC., ET AL., C.A. No. 1:20-03104 21cv171

JOHN, ET AL. v. CLEARVIEW AI, INC., C.A. No. 1:20-03481 21cv173

ROBERSON v. CLEARVIEW AI, INC., C.A. No. 1 :20-03705 21cv174

Case: 1:20-cv-00512 Document #: 106 Filed: 01/08/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:1697
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant toSection 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Harold C. Bevis,certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Pliant Corporation;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)           Disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)           All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November 14, 2006 |                      |
|-------------------------|---------------------------|
|                    |                      |
|                    |                      |
|                    | /s/ Harold C.  Bevis      |
|                    | Harold C. Bevis           |
|                    | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
exv10w3



 





EXHIBIT 10.3




[Travel Channel Letterhead]



As of May 20, 2004



World Poker Tour, L.L.C.

Attn: Steve Lipscomb

1041 North Formosa Avenue

Formosa Building, Suite 99

West Hollywood, CA 90046



	 	 	 
	Re:

	 	“World Poker Tour” — Option Exercise Letter — Season 3







Dear Steve:



     Reference is made to (i) that certain master agreement (the “Master
Agreement”) dated as of August 22, 2003 between WORLD POKER TOUR L.L.C.
(“Producer”) and THE TRAVEL CHANNEL, L.L.C. (“TRV”); (ii) that certain
agreement attached to the Master Agreement (the “Attachment”), dated as of
August 22, 2003 between Producer and TRV in connection with the second season
of the television production currently known as the “World Poker Tour” (the
“Program”); (iii) that certain fully executed Amendment to Season 2 Agreement,
dated as of April 22, 2004 (the “First Amendment”); and (iv) that certain fully
executed Amendment Number 2 to Season 2 Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2004
(the “Second Amendment”). The Master Agreement and the Attachment, as amended
by the First Amendment and the Second Amendment, are collectively hereinafter
referred to as the “Agreement.”



     Except as otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used by not defined
herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.



     In accordance with and subject to Paragraph 4 of the Attachment, TRV
hereby exercises its Option for an Additional Series Order in connection with
the third Season pursuant to the terms of the Agreement. This letter
supercedes and replaces the option exercise letter sent to you on April 12,
2004.


	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,





TRAVEL CHANNEL, L.L.C.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Rick Rodriguez
 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Its:   EVP & General Manager Travel Channel
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 308 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 308

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that candidates 
   for election for Federal office, the individuals working on their 
  campaigns, and persons involved with the financing of campaigns for 
  election for Federal office should obey all of the applicable laws, 
    rules, and regulations governing fundraising for such campaigns.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 5, 1997

Mr. Hayworth submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that candidates 
   for election for Federal office, the individuals working on their 
  campaigns, and persons involved with the financing of campaigns for 
  election for Federal office should obey all of the applicable laws, 
    rules, and regulations governing fundraising for such campaigns.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
all candidates for election for Federal office, the individuals working 
on their campaigns, and all persons involved with the financing of 
campaigns for election for Federal office should obey all of the 
applicable laws, rules, and regulations governing fundraising for such 
campaigns.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED SOVERIEGN
SPECIALTY CHEMICALS INC.'S MARCH 31, 1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            6053
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    38186
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      23955
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 72807
<PP&E>                                           59443
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (8936)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  234547
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            41716
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       55580
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    234547
<SALES>                                          55632
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 55632
<CGS>                                            37880
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    37880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 11804
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3462
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2486
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1106
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1380
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1380
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection
with the Annual Report of EPL Intermediate, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 27, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Stein, Vice President
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   |                                                                                                                                                        
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|   |                                                                                                                                                        
|2. | The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: March
23, 2007

| |                         
| | ------------------------
| | /s/ Joseph N. Stein     
| |                         
| | Joseph Stein            
| | Vice
  President        
| | EPL
  Intermediate, Inc.

This certification is made
solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other
purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to EPL Intermediate, Inc. and will be retained by EPL
Intermediate, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

---
#### Asha HASSEN, Petitioner, v. John D. ASHCROFT, Respondent.

No. 04-1606.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 8, 2004.

Decided Jan. 3, 2005.

Richard S. Bromberg, Law Offices of Richard S. Bromberg, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Allen W. Hausman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Thomas K. Ragland, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Asha Hassen, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming the immigration judge’s denial of her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).

We will reverse the Board only if the evidence “ ‘was so compelling that no reasonable fact finder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.’ ” *Rusu v.*
      *306
      *INS,*296 F.3d 316, 325 n. 14 (4th Cir.2002) (quoting *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992)). We have reviewed the administrative record, the immigration judge’s decision, and the Board’s order and find substantial evidence supports the conclusion that Hassen failed to establish the past persecution or well-founded fear of future persecution necessary to establish eligibility for asylum. *See 8*C.F.R. § 1208.13(a) (2004) (stating that the burden of proof is on the alien to establish eligibility for asylum); Eli*as-Zacarias,*502 U.S. at 483, 112 S.Ct. 812 (same).

Next, we uphold the Board’s denial of Hassen’s application for withholding of removal. The standard for withholding of removal is “more stringent than that for asylum eligibility.” *Chen v. INS,*195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir.1999). An applicant for withholding must demonstrate a clear probability of persecution. *INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca,*480 U.S. 421, 430, 107 S.Ct. 1207, 94 L.Ed.2d 434 (1987). As Hassen failed to establish refugee status, she cannot satisfy the higher standard necessary for withholding.

Furthermore, we conclude substantial evidence supports the determination that Hassen did not establish it was more likely than not that she would be tortured if removed to Ethiopia, *see*8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2004), and thus, that Has-sen’s petition for protection under the CAT was properly denied.

Accordingly, we deny Hassen’s petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*