alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

WEST COAST LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

Interpleader Plaintiff, 

v. 

MAUREEN MCCARTHY; JENNIFER 

CHILDE; ALEXANDRA STOLFE; 

ANDREW SOLFE; and Guardian of B.S., a 

minor, 

Interpleader Defendants 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 20-CV-4343 

AGREED MOTION TO WITHDRAW MAUREEN McCARTHY, ALEXANDRA 

STOLFE AND ANDREW STOLFE’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

Defendants/Cross-Plaintiffs, Maureen McCarthy, Alexandra Stolfe, and Andrew Stolfe 

(the “McCarthy Defendants”), with the agreement of the Parties, move to withdraw their Motion 

for Summary Judgment without prejudice, and in support thereof, state as follows: 

1. The McCarthy Defendants filed their Motion for Summary Judgment on September 

29, 2021, before the completion of discovery in this case. 

2. The parties have consulted regarding the Motion, and have agreed that the Motion 

should be withdrawn without prejudice so as to allow the parties time to conduct additional 

discovery. 

3. This motion is not made for the purpose of delaying this matter, and is made without 

prejudice to any party’s right to file/refile their motion for summary judgment in accordance with 

this Court’s trial schedule. 

Case: 1:20-cv-04343 Document #: 87 Filed: 11/23/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:981
Page 2 of 3

Respectfully submitted, 

Maureen McCarthy, Alexandra Stolfe and Andrew Stolfe 

 By: /s/ Mark L. Evans_______________ 

 Their attorneys 

Mark L. Evans (ARDC #6292784) 

LEVIN GINSBURG 

180 North LaSalle Street, Suite 3200 

Chicago, Illinois 60601-2800 

Telephone: (312) 368-0100 

Facsimile: (312) 368-0111 

mevans@lgattorneys.com 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-04343 Document #: 87 Filed: 11/23/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:982
Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on November 23, 2021, I electronically filed the referenced 

documents with the Clerk of the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, 

Eastern Division, using the CM/ECF system, which sent notification of such filing to the 

following registered CM/ECF participants: 

Attorney for the McCarthy Defendants 

Enrico Mirabelli 

Beermann, LLP 

161 N. Clark St., Ste 3000 

Chicago, IL 60601 

(312) 621-9700 

Ejmirabelli@beermannlaw.com

Attorney for B.S. 

Megan Mae Mathias 

Lopp Mathias Law 

1030 W. Chicago Avenue 

Chicago, IL 60642 

(312) 761-4172 

megan@loppmathiaslaw.com

Attorney for Jennifer Childe 

Stanley A. Kitzinger 

Nathan P. Karlsgodt 

McKnight & Kitzinger, LLC 

805 North Milwaukee Avenue, Suite 400 

Chicago, Illinois 60642 

(312) 463-9400 

skitzinger@mcknightkitzinger.com 

nkarlsgodt@mcknightkitzinger.com 

 _______/s/Mark L. Evans_____________ 

Case: 1:20-cv-04343 Document #: 87 Filed: 11/23/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:983
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: T.P., A MINOR

PETITION OF: T.P., A MINOR :

:

:

:

: No. 424 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30th day of April, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
** **

**Exhibit****31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

** **

**SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

** **

March 28, 2018

 

I, John E. Peak, certify that:

 

1.          Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by thisreport on Form 10-K of Wells Fargo Dealer Floorplan Master Note Trust (the ‘‘Exchange Act periodic reports’’);

 

2.          Basedon my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.          Basedon my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.          Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements inall material respects; and

 

5.          Allof the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordancewith Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, exceptas otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed inthis report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably reliedon information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas and BNY Mellon Trustof Delaware.
Exhibit 10.27

CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS HAVE BEEN OMITTED BASED UPON A REQUEST

FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT PURSUANT
TO RULE 24b-2 OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND HAVE BEEN SEPARATELY FILED

WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.

January 21, 2006

Mr. Sidney Prince

Gold Kist Inc.

244 Perimeter Center Parkway, N.E.

Atlanta, GA 30346-2397

Dear Mr. Prince:

As discussed and agreed, Gold Kist will supply the EPL system with the following:

Fresh Marinated Breast Meat - *** of EPL
System needs for EPL Specification ***. Price *** per pound delivered to MBM/Rancho Cucamonga, CA and MBM/Pleasanton, CA.

Fresh Marinated Thigh meat - ***
of EPL System needs for EPL Specification ***. Price *** per pound delivered to MBM/Rancho Cucamonga, CA and MBM/Pleasanton, CA.

*** of the system volume
will be set aside for the development of an alternate(s) supplier. Additionally, in the event that EPL discontinues the use of the current specification for marinated fresh breast and/or marinated fresh thigh meat and transitions to a new
un-marinated fresh breast and/or fresh thigh meat specification, Goldkist will continue to supply fresh breast and/or fresh thigh meat at the volumes Goldkist had previously supplied as fresh marinated breast and/or fresh marinated thigh meat. The
new price for un-marinated fresh breast meat will be *** per pound delivered to MBM/Rancho Cucamonga, CA and MBM/Pleasanton, CA. The new price for un-marinated fresh thigh meat will be *** per pound delivered to MBM/Rancho Cucamonga, CA and
MBM/Pleasanton, CA.

As part of this Purchase Agreement, Supplier warrants that the prices for the items identified herein are not higher than those
currently extended to any other customer for the same or like items in equal or less quantities. If Supplier reduces its price for such items to any other customer during the term of this Purchase Agreement, Supplier agrees to reduce the price
quoted in this Purchase Agreement correspondingly.

Additionally, El Pollo Locos decision to enter into this Agreement is independent of any support
your firm may or may not choose to provide to the El Pollo Loco system.

This commercial agreement is subject to the General Terms and Conditions of Supply
executed by the parties hereto and currently on file with El Pollo Loco, Inc.



---

Terms: Net 10 Days

Pricing contract period: 03/01/06 through 03/01/07.

Please sign and return both copies of this letter. After I have received both signed copies, I will sign and return a copy for your files. Signing this letter acknowledges acceptance of the terms and conditions as presented above.

Sidney, thank you for your help and support on this matter and please contact me with any questions.



|                             |  |  |  |                              
|---------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|                             |  | 
|/s/ Sidney Prince            |  |  |  | /s/ Joe Stein                
|Sidney Prince Gold Kist Inc. |  |  |  | Joe Stein El Pollo Loco, Inc.



|cc: | Jennifer Benus, Shanae Brown/MBM
|--- | --------------------------------
##### 



Year Ended December 31,2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003EARNINGSPre-tax income from operations
    
    $
    (4,836
    )
    
    $
    85,795
    
    
    $
    78,549
    
    
    $
    23,930
    
    
    $
    9,231Fixed charges
    
    
    16,650
    
    
    
    16,880
    
    
    
    16,403
    
    
    
    9,964
    
    
    
    13,786Capitalized interest
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Earnings available for fixed charges
    
    $
    11,814
    
    
    $
    102,675
    
    
    $
    94,952
    
    
    $
    33,894
    
    
    $
    23,017FIXED CHARGES:Interest expense (including debt issuance
costs amortized to interest expense)
    
    $
    14,296
    
    
    $
    15,147
    
    
    $
    14,720
    
    
    $
    8,849
    
    
    $
    12,768Capitalized interest
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Interest component of rent expense1
    
    
    2,354
    
    
    
    1,733
    
    
    
    1,684
    
    
    
    1,115
    
    
    
    1,018Total fixed charges
    
    $
    16,650
    
    
    $
    16,880
    
    
    $
    16,404
    
    
    $
    9,964
    
    
    $
    13,786Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    0.71
    
    
    
    6.08
    
    
    
    5.79
    
    
    
    3.40
    
    
    
    1.67
 
 1
    
    For purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed
charges, earnings are defined as income from continuing
operations before income taxes and cumulative effect of
change in accounting principles plus fixed charges. Fixed
charges include interest expense (including amortization of
deferred financing costs) and an estimate of operating rental
expense, approximately 20%, which management believes is
representative of the interest component.
#### Charles W. ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald D. EVANS; United States Patent & Trademark Office, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 04-2049.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 3, 2004.

Decided Dec. 23, 2004.

*277Charles W. Anderson, Appellant pro se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Charles W. Anderson appeals district court orders granting the Appellees’ motion to dismiss the constitutional claims and the retaliation claim and the motion for summary judgment with respect to Anderson’s Title VII and ADEA claims and denying his motion for reconsideration under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s findings and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Anderson v. Evans,*No. CA-04-211-A (E.D. Va. filed June 18, 2004 & entered June 22, 2004 *&*June 29, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-0063

_____________________________

MICHAEL S. WINTERS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County.

John H. Skinner, Judge.

March 11, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, ROWE, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 434 Agreed to House (ATH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 434

 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 1998

 Mr. Fazio of California submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, 
elected to the following standing committee of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on Small Business: Ms. Christian-Green of the Virgin 
Islands
                                 <all>
```
No. 14,853.

#### Harrod *v.*Dismore, Sheriff.

Filed March 10, 1891.

*Judgment.*— Collateral *Attach.*— A judgment rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction against a defendant for violating the statute prohibiting the obstruction of public ditches can not be collaterally attacked.

From the Scott Circuit Court.

*O. B. Harrod,*for appellant.

*G. L. Jewett,*for appellee.

Elliott, J.

The appellant seeks by his complaint to enjoin the collection of a judgment rendered against him for violating the statute prohibiting the obstruction of public ditches.

The contention of counsel is that the statute requires that the defendant in such a prosecution shall be fined ten dollars, and that, as the fine imposed was only five dollars, the judgment is void. This contention can not prevail. The court had general jurisdiction of the subject, and its judgment, even if erroneous, can not be collaterally assailed. The error complained of would not avail in a direct attack, since the imposition of a less fine than the law requires in a case where the only punishment is a fine, is not prejudicial to the defendant. *Nichols*v. *State, post,*p. 406.

Judgment affirmed.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of United PanAm Financial Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jim
      Vagim, certify in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer and President of the
      Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(a)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




(b)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto signed this Certification as
      of
      August 11, 2008.




/s/    JIM
                VAGIM**Jim
                Vagim****Chief
                Executive Officer and
                President**
National Advisory Committee on Windstorm Impact 

Reduction (NACWIR) Member 

 

John J. Boudreaux, LEM-Pro

Director of Homeland Security and Emergency 

Preparedness

Assumption Parish, Louisiana 

Mr. Boudreaux’s expertise is in the field of Emergency 

Management and “boots-on-the-ground” first response to 

disasters. He is the Director of the Office of Homeland 

Security and Emergency Preparedness for Assumption Parish, 

in south Louisiana. He is also the Director of Development and 

Permitting, the Floodplain Director, the Grants Manager for 

Hazardous Mitigation/CDBG Disaster Recovery, and Director of 

911 for Assumption Parish. Mr. Boudreaux is a certified Louisiana 

Emergency Manager and a certified Firefighter and Instructor I. 

During his nearly three decades as the head of Emergency Management in Assumption Parish, 

Mr. Boudreaux has led that community’s response to many events: hurricanes; multiple riverine, 

backwater and storm surge-induced floods; multiple tornadoes and straight line wind events; 

chemical and pipeline leaks; well blowouts; and a salt cavern failure that produced the Bayou 

Corne Sinkhole. Under his careful watch, his parish has experienced and recovered from over a 

dozen tropical cyclones and flood events that received Federal Disaster Declarations; 

catastrophic Hurricanes Andrew (1992), Katrina (2005), Rita (2005), and Gustav (2008) among 

them.

Among his professional affiliations, Mr. Boudreaux has served as President of the Louisiana 

Emergency Preparedness Association, President of the South Central Regional Construction 

Code Council, Regional Director of the River and Bayou Parish’s Mutual Aid Task Force and 

President of the Louisiana Chapter of the National Emergency Number Association. He has also 

served as Chairman of the Southeast Louisiana Hurricane Task Force. 

Mr. Boudreaux’s public service in emergency preparedness and response has been recognized 

through several awards, including three separate awards from the Louisiana Emergency 

Preparedness Association, and Firefighter of the Year awards from two different fire 

departments.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1403 

CAF 12-00015 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, CARNI, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

 

IN THE MATTER OF RONALD DAVID RAGIN, III, 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

V

 

LINDA DORSEY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

(APPEAL NO. 6.) 

 

ALAN BIRNHOLZ, EAST AMHERST, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. 

DAVID A. SHAPIRO, BUFFALO, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

MARY ANNE CONNELL, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, BUFFALO, FOR AALIYAH R. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Rosalie

Bailey, J.), entered October 24, 2011. The order dismissed the

petition. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Matter of Ragin v Dorsey ([appeal No. 1]

___ AD3d ___ [Dec. 28, 2012]).

Entered: December 28, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of DoubleClick Inc. (the Company) for
the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Kevin P. Ryan, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) the Report fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|
| | (2) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ KEVIN P. RYAN      
| |                        
| | Kevin P. Ryan          
| | Chief Executive Officer

Dated: May 10, 2004
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.6.3

Eastern Division

Michael J. Wood

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04584

Honorable Virginia M. Kendall

Capital Vision Services, LLC, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, July 6, 2022:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(II) and Stipulation of Dismissal [79], Plaintiff's

claims against all Defendants in this action are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice,

with each party to bear its own costsand attorneys' fees, and all rights of appeal waived,

and the claims of the putative class members are dismissed without prejudice. Status

hearing set for 7/6/2022 is stricken. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice(lk, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04584 Document #: 80 Filed: 07/06/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:600
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

) No. 20 CR 318

v. )

) Judge Robert Gettleman

OLALEKAN JACOB PONLE, )

a/k/a “Mark Kain” and “Mr. Woodbery” )

UNITED STATES BILL OF PARTICULARS

FOR FORFEITURE OF CERTAIN PROPERTY

The United States of America, by JOHN R. LAUSCH, JR., United States Attorney for the 

Northern District of Illinois, hereby files the following Bill of Particulars.

Through the violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 as alleged in Counts One through Eight of the 

indictment, the United States seeks forfeiture of any property involved in or traceable to the 

defendant’s violation including, but not limited to 151.885720427 Bitcoin Cryptocurrency

pursuant to the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c).

Dated: April 29, 2022

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. LAUSCH, JR.

United States Attorney

By: /s/ Andrew Dixon

ANDREW DIXON

Assistant United States Attorney

219 S. Dearborn Street

Chicago, Illinois 60604

(312) 353-5300

Case: 1:20-cr-00318 Document #: 56 Filed: 04/29/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:196