alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of U.S. Premium Beef, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the periodended August 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven D. Hunt, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  

 

|   |   |                                                  |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
| By:    |   |  /s/ Steven D. Hunt                              |
|   |   |  Steven D. Hunt

* Chief Executive Officer* |

 

Date: October 29, 2010
H. Res. 231

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 13, 1997.

Whereas the Department of State Country Reports on

Human Rights Practices for 1996 notes that the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam ‘‘denied citizens the right to change their government and significantly restricted freedom of speech, the press, assembly,

association, privacy, and religion’’;

Whereas, since May 1997, non-violent demonstrations against

corruption and abuse of power at the local level have occurred in Thai Binh Province and perhaps in Thanh

Hoa, Hung Yen, Nghe An, and Bien Hoa provinces as

well;

Whereas the criminal law of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam is used to punish individuals who are critical of the

government, and on April 14, 1997, an administrative decree was signed into law granting enhanced judicial powers to the security forces to place under house arrest or

subject to reeducation camps, for up to two years, any

civilians expected of ‘‘endangering national security’’;

Whereas the leaders of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam are

seeking to expand trade relations with the United States;

Whereas there is widespread discontent within the foreign

business community in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam,
2

•HRES 231 EH

with some companies pulling out entirely, others freezing

new investments, and nearly all complaining about endemic corruption, intransigent bureaucracy, and a lack of

clear commitment to legitimate economic reform;

Whereas, in August 1997, the United Nations Children’s

Fund (UNICEF) reported that child labor exploitation is

on the rise in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam with tens

of thousands of children under 15 years of age being exploited for labor; and

Whereas it is in the interest of the United States to promote

political and economic freedom throughout the world:

Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) urges the Government of the Socialist Republic

of Vietnam to release immediately and unconditionally

all political prisoners, including Dr. Nguyen Dan Que,

Prof. Doan Viet Hoat, Venerable Thich Quang Do, Reverend Pham Minh Tri, and evangelist To Dinh Trung,

with full restoration of their civil and human rights;

(2) requests the President to make clear to the

leadership of the Government of the Socialist Republic of

Vietnam—

(A) the firm commitment of the American people to political and religious and economic freedom

for the people of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam;

and

(B) the United States fully expects equal protection under the law to all Vietnamese, regardless
3

•HRES 231 EH

of religious belief, political philosophy, or previous

association; and

(3) urges the Government of the Socialist Republic

of Vietnam—

(A) to permit all political organizations in the

Socialist Republic of Vietnam to function without

intimidation or harassment; and

(B) to announce a framework and timetable

for free and fair elections that will allow the Vietnamese people to peacefully choose their local and

national leaders.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### L. D. Steadman *v.*Oldham, Scott, etc.

Judicial Sales — Taxes—Surplus Will be Paid to Defendant.

The Master Commissioner will not sell more property than will he sufficient to pay the debts. And if upon the coming in of his report it shall appear that the taxes are not due, the amount thereof will he paid to the appellant, if not needed to pay creditors.

APPEAL PROM SCOTT CIRCUIT COURT.

April 28, 1871.

OpinxoN by

Judge Peters:

Feeling from the very earnest petition of appellant’s counsel that it was proper to re-hear this case less some injustice might have been done his client, we have again examined the record and see no cause to depart from our first conclusion.

The pleadings and exhibits show a number of debts of very large amounts compared with the size and value of the tract of land mortgaged to secure them, none of which are controverted except that of Oldham and Scott’s, and from evidence that must be regarded as justly due.

The commissioner will not sell more property than will be sufficient to pay the debts. And if, upon the coming in of the Master’s report it shall appear that the taxes named in the judgment are not due, the amount thereof will be paid to appellant, if not needed to pay creditors.

*280
      *Polk, for ■appellant.*

*Kinkeq,d & Buckner, for appellee.*

It does not seem that there is any error in the judgment prejudicial to appellant.

Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7719

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHRISTOPHER K. WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CR-98-34, CA-00-38-4) Submitted: February 15, 2002 Decided: March 11, 2002 Before MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher K. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. James Ashford Metcalfe, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although we disagree with the district court’s conclusion that the motion for reconsideration was not timely filed, Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), 52(b), the district court alternately concluded, and we agree, that the motion was meritless. 2 PER CURIAM: Christopher K. Williams appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. * Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Williams , Nos. CR-98-34; CA-00-38-4 (E.D. Va. Aug. 7, 2001; Sept. 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING
OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT





I,
Richard Di Stefano, Chief Financial Officer of Rotoblock Corporation, hereby
certify that:





(1)  I have
reviewed this annual report of Rotoblock Corporation;





(2)  Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





(3)  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of Rotoblock Corporation as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;





(4)  Rotoblock
Corporation's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)):





(a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to Rotoblock Corporation, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of Rotoblock Corporation's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





(c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in Rotoblock Corporation's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during Rotoblock Corporation's most recent
fiscal quarter (Rotoblock Corporation's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, Rotoblock Corporation's internal control over financial
reporting; and





(5)  Rotoblock
Corporation's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
Rotoblock Corporation's auditors and the audit committee of Rotoblock
Corporation's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





(a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect Rotoblock Corporation's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and





(b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in Rotoblock Corporation's internal control over
financial reporting.





Dated: August
1,
2008 ROTOBLOCK
CORPORATION





/s/
Richard Di Stefano


By:
Richard Di Stefano, Chief Financial Officer/Principal Accounting Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40386 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus KIM IVAN MORILLA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:94-CR-128-1
- - - - - - - - - - January 22, 1996 Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Kim Ivan Morilla entered a conditional guilty plea to one count of possession with intent to distribute marijuana. Pursuant to his plea agreement, he now appeals the district court's denial of his motion to suppress. Morilla admits that the initial stop of his camper truck was valid. He contends that the subsequent detention and search of his vehicle violated his Fourth Amendment rights.No. 95-40386 -2- We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's denial of Morilla's motion to suppress. Morilla's conviction is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.57

 

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott L. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

/s/ Scott L. Thompson

Scott L. Thompson

Chief Executive Officer

May 6, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. and will be retained by Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. and furnished to the        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

VALENTINO TELFORT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3648

[March 14, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Elizabeth A. Scherer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

062012CF011334A88810.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul Edward Petillo, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph D. 

Coronato, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., TAYLOR and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Marcos Washington CUBAS; Maria De Carmen Monsalve De Cubas; Marie Ella Cubas, Petitioners, v. John ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-61013.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Jan. 4, 2005.

Gloria Sarahi Echevarria, Houston, TX, for Petitioners.

David V. Bernal, Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Barry Joseph Pettinato, U.S. Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC, Hipólito Acosta, U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Houston, TX, for Respondent.

Before DAVIS, SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Marcos Washington Cubas, his wife, Maria De Carmen Monsalve De Cubas, and their daughter, Marie Ella Cubas, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) opinion that affirmed the decision of the immigration judge denying Cubas asylum and withholding of removal.

The Cubases argues that the immigration judge’s finding that Cubas failed to demonstrate past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution is not supported by substantial evidence in light of his testimony and the evidence he submitted at the immigration hearing. We review the immigration judge’s decision because the BIA summarily affirmed the immigration judge’s decision, thereby making it the final agency decision. *See Soadjede v. Ashcroft,*324 F.3d 830, 832 (5th Cir.2003). We will uphold the immigration judge’s determination that Cuba is not eligible for asylum if it is supported by substantial evidence. *Faddoul v. INS,*37 F.3d 185, 188 (5th Cir.1994). To reverse the immigration judge’s determination that Cubas is not eligible for asylum, he must demonstrate the evidence was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could conclude against it. *Chun v. INS,*40 F.3d 76, 78 (5th Cir.1994). Cubas has failed to make the requisite showing. Accordingly, the petition for review is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pliant Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack E. Knott, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




By:

/S/    JACK E. KNOTTJack E. Knott Chief Executive
Officer November 14, 2002
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

WHAM-O HOLDING, LTD. and 

INTERSPORT CORP. d/b/a WHAM-O, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”,

Defendants.

Case No.: 1:20-cv-04196

Judge Matthew F. Kennelly

Magistrate Judge Maria Valdez

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiffs hereby file this Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to any remaining Defendants 

that have not been subject to a prior Order entered by the Court, including any consent judgment 

order, default judgment order, final judgment order or a prior dismissal entered by the Court. All 

such Defendants are hereby dismissed without prejudice. 

This terminates the action.

DATED: December 14, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt (Bar No. 6207971)

Keith Vogt, Ltd.

111 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1700

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Telephone: 312-675-6079

E-mail: keith@vogtip.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS

Case: 1:20-cv-04196 Document #: 54 Filed: 12/14/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:2417
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document was electronically filed on December 14, 2020 with the Clerk of the Court using the 

CM/ECF system, which will automatically send an email notification of such filing to all registered 

attorneys of record.

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt

Case: 1:20-cv-04196 Document #: 54 Filed: 12/14/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:2418
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<NAME>                        WEBSTER PREFERRED CAPITAL CORPORATION
<CIK>                         0001047865
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
<CURRENCY>                    US DOLLARS

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          23,355
<SECURITIES>                                   104,083
<RECEIVABLES>                                  856,583
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,742)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,881
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 988,160
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,061
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           40,000
<PREFERRED>                                      1,000
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     946,098
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   988,160
<SALES>                                         31,706
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,706
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,759
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   240
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,707
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,707
<EPS-BASIC>                                  292,760
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  292,760



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 54 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 54

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Small Business 
                   in the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 1997

 Mr. Talent submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Small Business 
                   in the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Small Business (hereinafter in 
this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $4,099,817 for the One Hundred 
Fifth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $2,014,818 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 1997, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 1998; and
            (2) not more than $2,084,999 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 1998, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 1999.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Oversight.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Oversight.
                                 <all>
```