alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2346
SAM DRAKULICH; JEANNE DRAKULICH, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Criminal Investigation Division; D. ARRVIN REEDY; SCOTT G. ADAMS, Defendants - Appellees, and ANNE MORRIS PRICE, Agent, Department of theTreasury; C. STEVEN KARGAUER; JACK PETRI, District Manager, Department of the Treasury; GEORGE E. SUTTON; NANCY REINITZ, Ombudsman, Internal Revenue Service; C. A. MOORE; NANCY GIVENS, Examination Division, Internal Revenue Service; SAL BARETTA; AILEEN CONDON; RETTA JONES; N. LAURA HARRISON; MARIE ANNE BORSUK, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-96-11-A) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 30, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.23 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sam Drakulich, Jeanne Drakulich, Appellants Pro Se. Patricia McDonald Bowman, Teresa Thomas Milton, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal from the district court's orders granting summary judgment to the government on their tax refund suit and dismi ssing their remaining state law claims against Reedy andAdams. Because Appellants failed to meet the jurisdictional prerequisites to maintaining a refund suit in district court, summary judgment was properly entered in favor of the government and we affirm. See 26 U.S.C. §§ 6511, 6532(a), 7422 (1994). Our review the record and the district court's order dismissing the Appellants'state law claims discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Drakulich v. Internal Revenue Service , No. CA-96-11-A (E.D. Va. Sept. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET OF KNOLOGY BROADBAND, INC. AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE RELATED
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000.
THIS INFORMATION IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               24,875,520
<ALLOWANCES>                                   663,084
<INVENTORY>                                 23,469,938
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,129,377
<PP&E>                                     378,816,543
<DEPRECIATION>                              64,880,304
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             373,574,291
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      126,388,108
<BONDS>                                    348,224,607
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        499
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                (116,604,245)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               373,574,291
<SALES>                                     43,004,713
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            43,074,973
<CGS>                                       19,305,821
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               91,946,719
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            28,611,588
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          28,787,666
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (77,483,334)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,755,666
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (75,727,668)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (75,727,668)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
H. Res. 419

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 6, 1998.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 1872) to amend the Communications Satellite

Act of 1962 to promote competition and privatization in satellite communications, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall

be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally

divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on Commerce. After general debate

the bill shall be considered for amendment under the fiveminute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original

bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule

the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by

the Committee on Commerce now printed in the bill. The

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be

considered as read. No amendment to the committee amend-
2

•HRES 419 EH

ment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order unless

printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated

for that purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII. Printed amendments shall be considered as read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during

further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce

to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on

any postponed question that follows another electronic vote

without intervening business, provided that the minimum

time for electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration

of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have

been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in

the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of

the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the

nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final

passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 15

- 00165

- CR

Raymond Clinton Hammer

v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 25th District Court of Lavaca County , Texas Trial Cause No. 14

- 08

- 9586CR

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered thi s cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
October 2 9 , 2015
Exhibit 10.14

Execution Version

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
(Gerard J. Hart)

THIS
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is entered into as of December 26, 2007, by and between TEXAS ROADHOUSE, INC., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), and GERARD J. HART, a resident of the Commonwealth of Kentucky
("Executive").

RECITALS

A.    The
Executive is currently the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

B.    The
Company desires to continue the employment of Executive, and Executive wishes such employment, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, to be governed
by the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

AGREEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the respective agreements of the Company and Executive set forth below, the Company and Executive,
intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:



---





Date

Amount VestingJanuary 7, 2009

60,000 sharesJanuary 7, 2010

60,000 sharesJanuary 7, 2011

60,000 sharesJanuary 7, 2012

60,000 shares


2

---





3

---





4

---





5

---





6

---







7

---







8

---





9

---





10

---





*
* * * *

[Remainder of this page intentionally left blank.]

11

---



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Executive and the Company have executed this Agreement on this 14th day of January, 2008.

| | TEXAS ROADHOUSE, INC.
| | ---------------------
| | By:                  
| | GERARD J. HART       
| | /s/ Gerard J. Hart   
| |                      

12

---



QuickLinks
#### SAMUEL K. KAIN, RESPONDENT, v. MORRIS S. COBLE, APPELLANT.

Argued May 17, 1945

Decided September 27, 1945.

For the respondent, *Alfred I). Antonio.*

For the appellant, *David T. Wilentz.*

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should lie affirmed, for the Reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justine Parker in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*— The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Wells, Nafferty, Dill, Freund, JJ. 10.

*For affirmance*(not on opinion below) — -Case, J. 1.

*For reversal*— None.
| **OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE****ARCap SERVICING, INC.**The undersigned, James L. Duggins, the President of ARCap Servicing, Inc., the Special Servicer under that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") dated as of May 1, 2002, relating to the J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2004-C2, hereby certifies as follows: 1. a review of the activities of the Special Servicer and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement during the calendar year 2004 has been made under the undersigned's supervision; 2.  to the best of the undersigned's knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has maintained an effective internal control system relating to its servicing of the Mortgage Loans serviced by it and has fulfilled in all material respects its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout such calendar year 2004; and 3.  the Special Servicer has received no notice regarding qualification, or challenging the status of either Loan REMIC, the Lower-Tier REMIC or the Upper-Tier REMIC as a REMIC from the Internal Revenue Service or any other governmental agency or body. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. **IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, as of the 7 day of March, 2005, I have hereunto signed my name. **ARCap SERVICING, INC.,**a Delaware corporation **BY**: /s/ *James L. Duggins*James L. Duggins, President |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of US Dataworks, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ Charles E. RameyCharles E. Ramey,Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 558 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                       October 1, 1998.
    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI for a two-thirds 
vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is 
presented to the House is waived with respect to any resolution reported from 
that committee on the legislative day of October 1 or October 2, 1998, providing 
for consideration or disposition of a conference report to accompany a bill or 
joint resolution making general appropriations for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 1999, or any amendment reported in disagreement from a conference 
thereon.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Federal IoT Advisory Board Meeting

Location Privacy

Jeff Jockisch & Colby Scullion of
Amy Boyer

1978-1999

Died as the result of location data sold by an internet broker?
Your Phone Leaks Your 

Location...

Mobile GPS

● 16 - 32 ft.

research

Wi-Fi

● 16-49 ft.

research

Bluetooth

● <16 ft.

research

Cell Signal

● 3⁄4 square mile

research
MAID is the Problem

Mobile Advertising ID... 

most people have no idea 

they have one - or that its 

used like a SSN for the 

surveillance economy, 

especially for location data.
MAID is the Problem ...
Statistics

3%

Delete Their 

MAIDs

4 location

pings ID 

95% of

Americans

Brokers 

Selling 

Direct 

Lookups

We have 

identified

124

Brokers of

Location

page. 6
Who is Hurt Most

by a Lack of Location Privacy?

Domestic

Violence 

Victims 

2M

Law 

Enforce 

697K

Election 

Workers 

900K

Journalists

49K

Reproductive 

Health

40M

C Suite

494K

US

Courts

117K

Congress

7K

Athletes

5K

US

Military

1.3M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0082 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DANIEL HUNTER FLANSBURG,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 30 , 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 24 2022

05/24/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0082
H. Res. 590

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 10, 1998.

Whereas 13-year-old Hunter Scott of Cantonment, Florida,

has received international recognition for his efforts to

honor the memory of the captain and crew of the U.S.S.

INDIANAPOLIS, which sank in the Pacific Ocean during the final days of World War II;

Whereas Hunter Scott has spent the past two years seeking

recognition for the crew of the U.S.S. INDIANAPOLIS,

many of whom perished as a result of shark attacks and

exposure after being stranded in the water for four days;

Whereas Hunter Scott’s extensive work is the subject of legislation before this Congress, supported by Democrats and

Republicans alike;

Whereas Hunter Scott’s work ethic, love of country, and

strength of character serve as a shining example to the

young people of the United States; and

Whereas Hunter Scott has helped the crew of the U.S.S. INDIANAPOLIS receive international recognition from the

New York Times, USA Today, the Associated Press,

CBS, Nickelodeon, and other print and broadcast media:

Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes

and honors Hunter Scott for his efforts to honor the memory
2

•HRES 590 EH

of the captain and crew of the U.S.S. INDIANAPOLIS and

for the outstanding example he has set for the young people

of the United States.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 12.1

WII Components, Inc.  Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

(In thousands, except ratio)

|                                                                                                              |  | Successor |        | Predecessor |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------- | ------ | ----------- | -
|
|
|
|Income before provision for income taxes, discontinued operations, and cumulative effect of accounting change |  | $         | 6,963  |             | $
|Fixed Charges:                                                                                                |  |           |        |             |  
|Interest expense(a)                                                                                           |  |           | 12,767 |             |  
|Interest portion of rent expense(b)                                                                           |  |           | 96     |             |  
|                                                                                                              |  |           |        |             |  
|Total fixed charges                                                                                           |  |           | 12,863 |             |  
|                                                                                                              |  |           |        |             |  
|Total earnings(c)                                                                                             |  | $         | 19,826 |             | $
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                                                            |  |           | 1.5    |             |  
|Ratio coverage deficiency                                                                                     |  |           |       |             |  

---

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 31.3 – Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxleyact of 2002
I, George E. Cline, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of TarponCoast Bancorp, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s)and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thesmall business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (thesmall business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
 5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and theaudit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function):
(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesigned or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
 

 

small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and
(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
        Date: July 26, 2004 /s/ George E. Cline   George E. Cline   Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

CASE NO: 1:20-cv-03184

HENRY JACKSON,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

MAYBERRY, INC., et. al.,

Defendants.

/

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, HENRY JACKSON (“Plaintiff”), by and through undersigned counsel, and 

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), hereby files his Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without 

Prejudice.

Dated this 24th day of July 2020.

Respectfully Submitted,

JORDAN RICHARDS, PLLC

805 E. Broward Blvd. Suite 301

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301

Counsel for Plaintiff

By: /s/ Jordan Richards

JORDAN RICHARDS, ESQUIRE

Illinois Bar No. 6328923

jordan@jordanrichardspllc.com

melissa@jordanrichardspllc.com

jake@jordanrichardspllc.com
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing motion was filed and served on all 

parties listed below via CM/ECF on July 24, 2020. 

By: /s/ Jordan Richards

JORDAN RICHARDS, ESQUIRE

Illinois Bar No. 6328923

SERVICE LIST