alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 130 Agreed to House (ATH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 130

Providing for a lump sum allowance for the Corrections Calendar Office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 1997

Mr. Gutknecht submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for a lump sum allowance for the Corrections Calendar Office.

    Resolved, 

SECTION 1. LUMP SUM ALLOWANCE FOR CORRECTIONS CALENDAR OFFICE.

    There shall be a lump sum allowance of $300,000 per fiscal year for 
the salaries and expenses of the Corrections Calendar Office, 
established by House Resolution 7, One Hundred Fifth Congress, agreed 
to January 7, 1997. Such amount shall be allocated between the majority 
party and the minority party as determined by the Speaker, in 
consultation with the minority leader.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The allowance under section 1--
            (1) shall be available beginning with the month of May 
        1997;
            (2) through the end of September 1997, shall be paid from 
        the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives on a 
        pro rata basis; and
            (3) beginning with fiscal year 1998, shall be paid as 
        provided in appropriations Acts.

                                 <all>
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Monaghan","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-b-monaghannasa-gov\/","title":"Benjy Neumann","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"5UIHgsk8Jm\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/benjy-neumann\/\">Benjy Neumann<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/benjy-neumann\/embed\/#?secret=5UIHgsk8Jm\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Benjy Neumann” — NASA\" data-secret=\"5UIHgsk8Jm\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/nuemann.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":750}
Order entered March 6 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 015 31
- CR THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.
CHANTIMA RONMAI , Appellee On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court C ause No. F13
- 100 20
- Q



### O RDER On February 17, 2014, we received the clerk’s record in this appeal. The record does not contain a copy of the trial court’s written order granting appellee’s motion to suppress, which is the subject of this State’s appeal.
Acc ordingly, this Court ORDERS the trial court to prepare a written order memorializing the court’s ruling on appellee’s motion to suppress and to file a supplemental record containing the order within TWENTY
- ONE DAYS of the date of this order. The State’s br ief is due within SIXTY DAYS of the date of this order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Lena Levario, Presiding Judge, 204th Judicial District Court; Monica Davis, Court Coordinator, 204th Judi cial District Court; Cynthia Bailey, Chief Clerk, 204th Judicial DistrictCourt; Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk’s

Office, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT 32.1** **CERTIFICATION    OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002    (18 USC §1350, as adopted), Karen Magee, the Chief    Executive Officer of PlanetOut Inc. (the “Company”),    hereby certifies that, to the best of her knowledge:     1. The Company’s Annual Report on    Form 10-K    for the period ended December 31, 2006, and to which this    Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 fully complies    with the requirements of Section 13(a) or    Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934, and     2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company for the periods presented    therein. **In Witness Whereof,**the undersigned has set her hand    hereto as of the    9h    day of March 2007. /s/  KAREN    MAGEE    Karen Magee    Chief Executive Officer     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant    to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as    part of this report. A signed original of this written statement    required by Section 906 has been provided to PlanetOut Inc.    and will be retained by PlanetOut Inc. and furnished to the    Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 10.27**

**EXECUTION COPY**

**EXTENSION OF EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

This EXTENSION OF EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Extension”) is made as of February 28, 2009 by and between Atlantic Broadband Management, LLC, aDelaware limited liability company (the “Company”), and Richard Shea (“Executive”). 

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered anExecutive Employment Agreement dated March 1, 2004 (the “Agreement”) which will expire on February 28, 2009; 

WHEREAS the Company andExecutive desire to enter into a new employment agreement; and 

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive wish to extend the terms of the Agreement on an interimbasis for a period of six months to allow parties sufficient time to enter a new agreement. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenantscontained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

Section 1. Extension of Employment Period The Employment Period shall be extended for a period of six months, beginning on the date of this Extension, unless terminated earlier under the provisions of Section 5(a) (ii) – (iii) or by execution of a new employment agreement by Company and Executive. The term “fifth anniversary” is amended to read “fifth anniversary plus six months” wherever it appears in theAgreement. In all other respects, the Agreement shall remain unamended. 

Section 2. Retroactive Effect The terms and consideration as agreed toby Company and Executive in a new employment agreement to be entered into following the date hereof shall apply retroactively to March 1, 2009. 

Section 3. Capitalized Terms Capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Agreement. 

Section 4.Governing Law. Issues and questions concerning the construction, validity, enforcement and interpretation of this Extension will be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to anychoice of law or conflict of law rules or provisions (whether of the State of Delaware or any other jurisdiction) that would cause the application of the laws of any jurisdiction other than the State of Delaware. In furtherance of the foregoing, theinternal law of the State of Delaware will control the interpretation and construction of this Extension, even though under Delaware’s choice of law or conflict of law analysis, the substantive law of some other jurisdiction would ordinarilyapply. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Extension of Executive Employment Agreement as of the datefirst written above. 

 
ATLANTIC BROADBAND MANAGEMENT, LLCBy: 
 
Name: Title: 
 
Richard Shea
CFTC Ex. 470

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 82-1 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1841
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 82-1 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:1842
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 82-1 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:1843
CFTC Ex. 142

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 80-7 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:1673
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 80-7 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:1674
NIST Workshop on Bias in AI

August 18, 2020

9:00am ‐ 5:00pm EDT

–AGENDA –

9:00 AM Welcome and Introduction – Elham Tabassi, Acting Chief of Staff, NIST Information

Technology Laboratory

9:15 AM Plenary: Panel Session

Foundational Juggernaut: Addressing data bias challenges in AI

▪ Darrell West (Moderator) Brookings Institution

▪ Andrew Burt, BNH, Immuta

▪ Alexandra Chouldechova, Partnership on AI, Carnegie Mellon University

▪ Fernando Diaz

▪ Teresa Tung, Accenture Labs

10:30 AM Break / Transition to Breakout Session #1 (multiple breakouts, locations varied)

10:45 AM Breakout Session #1 – Data Bias

This breakout session will build on topics from the morning panel session. Participants will

engage in a facilitated discussion focused on the following questions:

● What is the “right data”?

● What are the biggest barriers to success at this point?

● How can technology developers and practitioners effectively work together and

inform each other to mitigate data bias?

● From what shared understandings or assumptions about bias in AI do we need to

operate before moving onto the next step?

● What do we need in order to measure bias within data?

● How does bias exhibit itself in data? Are there particular indicators?

11:30 Break ‐ 20 minutes

11:50 Plenary: Report Outs from Breakout Sessions ‐ Data Bias

This plenary session will be an opportunity to hear the key takeaways from each breakout

session about data bias. (Breakout Session Facilitators)

12:30 PM 1‐hour Lunch Break

1:30 PM Plenary: Panel Session

Algorithmic bias is in the question, not the answer: Measuring and managing bias beyond

data

▪Joshua Kroll (Moderator), Naval Postgraduate School

▪ Aylin Caliskan, The George Washington University

▪ Abigail Jacobs, University of Michigan

▪ Nicol Turner Lee, Brookings Institution

▪ Kush Varshney, IBM

Transition to Breakout Session #2 (multiple breakouts, locations varied)

2:45 PM Breakout Session #2 – Bias in Algorithmic Modeling

This breakout session will build on topics from the afternoon panel session. Participants will

engage in a facilitated discussion focused on the following questions:

● Algorithms are highly dependent on data, which can be biased. But how does the

algorithmic process insert additional biases?

● Is it possible to use algorithms to mitigate data biases?

● What do we need in order to measure algorithmic bias?

● How does bias exhibit itself in the model?
                         

                         

       

                 

                             

             

                 

   

● How can algorithms exacerbate biases? How can they be used to mitigate biases?

● How can we think about transparency and its role in bias in AI?

3:30 PM 20‐minute break

3:50 PM Plenary: Report Outs from Breakout Sessions ‐ Algorithmic Bias

This plenary session will be an opportunity to hear the key takeaways from each breakout

session about algorithmic bias. (Breakout Session Facilitators)

4:30 PM Closeout (Elham Tabassi, NIST Information Technology Laboratory)

4:45 PM Adjourn
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,__________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A0003. DAVID T. WEBLEY v. EVERBANK.

This case began as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. After an

adverse ruling, defendant David T. Webley appealed the magistrate court’s decision

to the superior court. The superior court entered judgment in favor of Everbank.

Webley has appealed that order directly to this Court.

Because the order at issue disposes of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court

decision, Webley was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedures. See

OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175)

(1995). His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is

hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/28/2014

August 28, 2014
---

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



---



FORM 10-Q/A



---



Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003



Commission File Number 000-24051



---



UNITED PANAM FINANCIAL CORP.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its
charter)



---



|                                                               |  |                                        
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|California                                                     |  | 95-3211687                             
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)



3990 Westerly Place,
Suite 200

Newport Beach, CA 92660

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)



(949) 224-1917

(Registrants telephone number, including area code)



---



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No ̈



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act).    Yes ̈No  x



The number of shares outstanding of the Registrants Common Stock as of May 1, 2003 was
15,872,666 shares.



---



---

EXPLANATORY NOTE



This quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A amends our original quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003
as of the date of filing the original Form 10-Q on May 13, 2003. We are amending the original quarterly report for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 to correct and restate the consolidated financial statements for the quarters ended March 31, 2003
and 2002. The restated numbers for the quarters ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 and a further explanation about the restatements are included in the annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003, which was filed on September 3,
2004.



---

SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.



|                       |  |                                                                                 
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: October 26, 2004 |  | United PanAm Financial Corp.                                                    
|                       | 
|                       |  | /s/ Ray Thousand                                                                
|                       |  | Ray Thousand Chief Executive Officer and
President (Principal Executive Officer)
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 250

Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 1997

Mr. FAZIO submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating minority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Members be, and

2 are hereby, elected to the following standing committee of

3 the House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT:

5 Mr. Sabo, Mr. Pastor, Mr. Fattah, and Ms. Lofgren.

Æ
Case: 1:20-cv-02875 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/13/20 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1
Case: 1:20-cv-02875 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/13/20 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:2
Case: 1:20-cv-02875 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/13/20 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:3
Case: 1:20-cv-02875 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/13/20 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:4
Case: 1:20-cv-02875 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/13/20 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:5
#### STATE v. BURNS

No. 118A97

Case below: 125 N.C.App. 616

Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals allowed 8 May 1997. Motion by Attorney General to dismiss defendant’s appeal allowed 8 May 1997.
ϭ

,17+(81,7('67$7(6',675,&7&2857

)257+(1257+(51',675,&72),//,12,6

&RPPRGLW\)XWXUHV7UDGLQJ&RPPLVVLRQ       

      

   3ODLQWLII  

       &DVH1R&9

Y    

       -XGJH7KRPDV'XUNLQ

/RQJ/HDI7UDGLQJ*URXS,QF-DPHV$ 

'RQHOVRQ7LPRWK\0(YDQV-HUHP\6 

5XWKDQG$QGUHZ'1HOVRQ  

      

   'HIHQGDQWV

'()(1'$17¶68123326('027,21)25(;7(16,212)7,0(

7KH'HIHQGDQW-(5(0<587+IRUKLV8QRSSRVHG0RWLRQIRU([WHQVLRQRI7LPHWR

$QVZHURU2WKHUZLVH3OHDGVWDWHVDVIROORZV

 'HIHQGDQWZDLYHGVHUYLFHRQ-XO\

 'HIHQGDQWLVUHTXLUHGWRDQVZHURURWKHUZLVHSOHDGE\$XJXVW

 'HIHQGDQWKDVSRNHQZLWKDQDWWRUQH\WKDWKHH[SHFWVWRUHSUHVHQWKLPEXWKHKDVQRW

EHHQDEOHWRDUUDQJHIRUUHWDLQLQJWKHDWWRUQH\DVRIQRZ

 'HIHQGDQWUHTXHVWVDQH[WHQVLRQRIWLPHWRDQVZHURURWKHUZLVHSOHDGXQWLO2FWREHU



 &RXQVHOIRU3ODLQWLIIGRHVQRWRSSRVHWKLVPRWLRQ

)RUWKHVHUHDVRQV'HIHQGDQWDVNVWKH&RXUWWRH[WHQGWKHWLPHWRILOHKLVDQVZHURUWR

RWKHUZLVHSOHDGWR2FWREHU

$XJXVWWK    5HVSHFWIXOO\

V-HUHP\5XWK 

FILED

8/31/2020

THOMAS G. BRUTON CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

DJ

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 17 Filed: 08/31/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:93
Ϯ

-HUHP\5XWK

%ULVWD:D\

$XVWLQ7;



MHUHP\VUXWK#KRWPDLOFRP

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 17 Filed: 08/31/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:94
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Anyone requiring information regarding the ACCV should contact Annie Herzog, DICP, HSB, HRSA, Room 11C-26, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857, telephone (301) 443-6593, or email:                         *aherzog@hrsa.gov.*

Dated: November 7, 2014.

Jackie Painter,

Acting Director, Division of Policy and Information Coordination.

[FR Doc. 2014-27188 Filed 11-14-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
Case: 1:20-cr-00447 Document #: 22-1 Filed: 01/19/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:50
#### J. B. Wilder & Co. *v.*L. Pepper & Co.

Assignments for Benefit of Creditors — Mortgage to Secure Debt Part of Which was Previously Due — Acts of 1856.

Where an insolvent debtor executes a mortgage on his property to secure the payment of a debt some of which was previously due, however inconsiderable that debt may he, it brings the conveyance within the inhibitions of the Acts of 1866.

APPEAL PROM CALDV/ELL CIRCUIT COURT.

December 17, 1871.

OpinioN by

Judge Lindsay:

The answers of the two appellees, Barkley and Pepper, are vague and unsatisfactory. Neither of them offer any explanation whatever, as to the creation of the indebtedness the mortgage was intended to secure. Barkley in his deposition states *266that it was the assumption by Pepper of his indebtedness to Cloud and Aiken and yet Pepper in his answer filed six months after the execution of the mortgage states that Bark-ley was still indebted to Cloud and Aiken, in the full amount of the two debts. Barkley swears he (Pepper) assumed to pay. In addition to this fact it is developed by the record that a portion of the drugs mortgaged to Pepper passed through his hands to Cloud and Aiken, considering the further fact that Pepper was the attorney for Cloud and Aiken and had their claim against Barkley in his hands for collection. We can not escape the conclusion that the mortgage was intended to secure their claims, and that it was made to Pepper to mislead other creditors as to the real consideration, and thereby prevent proceedings to subject the property under the Act of 1856. But if we are mistaken in this view, the judgment must be reversed for another reason. At the time the mortgage was executed the two debts due Cloud and Aiken did not (interest and cost included) amount to the sum of seven hundred and fifty dollars, and that fact taken in connection with statements made by Barkley at the close of his deposition leaves no doubt but that a debt previously due from the witness to Pepper was also included in the mortgage. However inconsiderable that debt may have been, it brings the conveyance within the inhibitions of the Act of 1856. There being no room to doubt that it was executed to prefer Cloud and Aiken, and Pepper to the exclusion of the other creditors of the grantor, and that it was made in contemplation of insolvency.

*Pirtle and Caruth and R. H.*Darby, *for appellant.*

*T. Z. Morrow, for appellees.*

Wherefore the judgment dismissing appellant’s petition is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.