alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Regina WATKINS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Patricia HUFFMAN, Warden, Department of Corrections, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 04-7400.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 2004.

Decided Dec. 23, 2004.

Regina Watkins, Appellant pro se. John H. McLees, Jr., Office of the Attorney-General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Regina Watkins, a Virginia inmate, seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that her constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Watkins has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Republic Technologies (NA), LLC and Sream, Inc.

Plaintiff

vs.

Mega Convenience Corp d/b/a Channahon Convenience & Tobacco, et al.

Defendant

Case #: 1:20-cv-00433

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

The undersigned, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes and says: That s(he) is now and at all the times herein mentioned was

a citizen of the United States, over the age of 18, not a party to nor interested in the above entitled action, is competent to be

witness therein, and that I served copies of the:

Summons & Complaint For Injunctive Relief and Damages

PARTY SERVED: MEGA CONVENIENCE CORP D/B/A CHANNAHON CONVENIENCE & TOBACCO

PERSON SERVED: SULTON RFKAI, EMPLOYEE

METHOD OF SERVICE: Corporate - By leaving copies with the person identified above who stated they were authorized to

accept service.

DATE & TIME OF DELIVERY: 05/11/2020 at 12:27 PM

ADDRESS, CITY AND STATE: 24735 W EAMS ST, CHANNAHON, IL 60410

DESCRIPTION: Middle Eastern, Male, 25, 5'7'', 130 lbs, Black hair

I declare under penalties of perjury that the information contained herein is true and correct.

__________________________________________

Chris Adlington, Lic # 117-001119

Judicial Attorney Services, Inc.

2100 Manchester Rd., Ste 505

Wheaton, IL 60187

(630) 221-9007

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me on the 11th day of May, 2020.

_______________________________________________

NOTARY PUBLIC

CLIENT: Langone, Johnson & Cassidy, LLC

FILE #:

Tracking #: 436371

Case: 1:20-cv-00433 Document #: 14 Filed: 05/17/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:132
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 379

To facilitate a Forest Service land exchange that will eliminate a private 

in-holding in the Sierra National Forest in the State of California and 

provide for the permanent enjoyment by the Boy Scouts of America 

of a parcel of National Forest System land currently used under a 

special use permit, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 27, 2003

Mr. RADANOVICH (for himself, Mr. NUNES, and Mr. DOOLEY of California) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To facilitate a Forest Service land exchange that will eliminate a private in-holding in the Sierra National Forest 

in the State of California and provide for the permanent 

enjoyment by the Boy Scouts of America of a parcel 

of National Forest System land currently used under 

a special use permit, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sierra National Forest 

5 Land Exchange Act of 2003’’. 
2

HR 379 IH 

1 SEC. 2. LAND EXCHANGE, SIERRA NATIONAL FOREST, CALI2 FORNIA. 

3 (a) RECEIPT OF PRIVATE LANDS.—In exchange for 

4 the land described in subsection (b), the owners of a parcel 

of private land consisting of the north 1 5 ⁄2 of the northwest 

1 6 ⁄4 of section 29, township 8 south, range 26 east, Mount 

7 Diablo base and meridian, California, shall convey all of 

8 their right, title, and interest in and to the parcel to the 

9 Secretary of Agriculture. 

10 (b) CONVEYANCE OF FOREST SERVICE PROPERTY.—

11 Upon receipt of the land conveyed under subsection (a), 

12 the Secretary of Agriculture shall convey to the persons 

13 making such conveyance all right, title, and interest of the 

14 United States in and to a parcel of National Forest System land consisting of the east 1⁄2 of the southwest 1 15 ⁄4

and the west 1⁄2 of the southeast 1 16 ⁄4 of section 30, town17 ship 9 south, range 25 east, Mount Diablo meridian, Cali18 fornia. 

19 (c) RECONVEYANCE.—The conveyance under sub20 section (b) shall be subject to the condition that the recipi21 ents of the land agree to convey the land, within a time 

22 period agreed to by the Secretary of Agriculture and the 

23 recipient, to the Sequoia Council of the Boy Scouts of 

24 America. 
3

HR 379 IH 

1 (d) EQUAL VALUE OF PARCELS.—The value of the 

2 two parcels of real property to be exchanged under this 

3 section are deemed to be equal.

Æ
Case: 1:20-cv-02402 Document #: 102 Filed: 06/10/22 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:2033
Case: 1:20-cv-02402 Document #: 102 Filed: 06/10/22 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:2034
Case: 1:20-cv-02402 Document #: 102 Filed: 06/10/22 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:2035
Case: 1:20-cv-02402 Document #: 102 Filed: 06/10/22 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:2036
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 222 (Tuesday, November 18, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 68729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27233]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Business and Operations Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following 
meeting:
    Name: Business and Operations Advisory Committee (9556).
    Date/Time: December 11, 2014; 1:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. (EST), 
December 12, 2014; 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. (EST).
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, Virginia 22230; Stafford I, Room 1235.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Joan Miller, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230 (703) 292-8200.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice concerning issues related to 
the oversight, integrity, development and enhancement of NSF's business 
operations.
    Agenda:

December 11, 2014

    Welcome/Introductions; BFA/OIRM Updates; iTRAK Update; NSF 
Relocation Update; Succession Planning; Managing Change at NSF; 
Strategic Review Process.

December 12, 2014

    Risk-Based Management; Prepare for Discussion with Dr. 
C[oacute]rdova; Discussion with Dr. C[oacute]rdova; Meeting Wrap-Up.

    Dated: November 13, 2014.
Suzanne Plimpton,
Acting, Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-27233 Filed 11-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### STATE ex rel. COMR. OF INS. v. N.C. RATE BUREAU

No. 35P97

Case below: 124 N.C.App. 674

Petition by petitioner (NC Rate Bureau) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 May 1997.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Everett McKinley Dirksen

United States Courthouse

Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn Street

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Office of the Clerk

Phone: (312) 435-5850 

www.ca7.uscourts.gov 

 

NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF MANDATE

October 4, 2021 

To: Thomas G. Bruton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of Illinois

Chicago, IL 60604-0000

No. 20-2708 

JAMES SMITH, on behalf of himself and all others similarly 

situated, and on behalf of the Triad Manufacturing, Inc. Employee 

Stock Ownership Plan, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TRIAD MANUFACTURING, INC., et 

al., 

 Defendants - Appellants

Originating Case Information:

District Court No: 1:20-cv-02350

Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division

District Judge Ronald A. Guzman

Herewith is the mandate of this court in this appeal, along with the Bill of Costs, if any. A 

certified copy of the opinion/order of the court and judgment, if any, and any direction as to 

costs shall constitute the mandate. 

AMOUNT OF BILL OF COSTS (do not include the $): 150.00

DATE OF MANDATE OR AGENCY CLOSING LETTER 

ISSUANCE: 10/04/2021

RECORD ON APPEAL STATUS: No record to be returned

Case: 20-2708 Document: 00713887461 Filed: 10/04/2021 Pages: 2

Case: 1:20-cv-02350 Document #: 72 Filed: 10/04/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:462
form name: c7_Mandate (form ID: 135)

Case: 20-2708 Document: 00713887461 Filed: 10/04/2021 Pages: 2

Case: 1:20-cv-02350 Document #: 72 Filed: 10/04/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:463
Exhibit 13.2

Certification

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of LG Display Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: April 30, 2015



/s/ SANGDON KIMSangdon Kim
Director, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 has been provided to LG Display Co., Ltd. and will be retained by LG Display Co., Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited interim financial statements contained in Form 10QSB of registrant
consisting of the balance sheet as of March 31, 2000, and income statements and
statements of cash flows for the interim periods up to March 31, 2000 and 1999
and income statements for the fiscal quarters ended on those dates.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                        17,937
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              17,937
<PP&E>                                        71,164
<DEPRECIATION>                              (29,650)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                59,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        113,536
<BONDS>                                      249,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      55,767
<OTHER-SE>                                   472,463
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  59,451
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   0
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (279,648)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    0
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (279,648)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                               (279,648)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.02)



</TABLE>
February 2004

New Requirements for Grain Moisture Meters Capable of 

Measuring Test Weight 

By G. Diane Lee 

Specifications and tolerances for meters that measure the test weight of grain were added 

to Section 5.56 (a) of the 2004 edition of NIST Handbook 44 (H 44). Prior to this change 

only a tolerance, 0.15 lb/bu, for test weight was included in the NIST Handbook 44 Grain 

Moisture Meters code. That tolerance was taken from the Federal Grain Inspection 

Service, now Grain Inspection Packers and Stockyards Administration, mainte-nance 

procedure, which compared results obtained using a "standard" quart test kettle to results 

obtained on the kettle under test. However, this test was not realistic for field testing and 

the various types of devices in commercial use, and different tolerances needed to be 

considered for each grain type. 

One of the principle factors for the grade of a sample of grain is the test weight. The test 

weight or mass per volume (typically expressed as pounds per bushel or lb/bu) is a 

measurement used in the market place that will affect the amount of money a farmer 

receives for his grain based on the weight of a sample. Typically, the heavier a sample of 

grain, the better it is. A heavier sample of grain has a higher commercial value. In 

addition grain grades have been adopted so that the value of different grain lots can be 

compared. Most of the grain in commerce is sold by its grade. The highest grades of 

grain will receive the highest prices. When the test weight of a given sample of grain 

fails to meet specified minimum standards for test weight, the price of the grain is 

discounted. That is, the price the farmer receives for the grain is reduced by a certain 

amount for every pound per bushel below the minimum standard. 

NTEP grain moisture meters that are capable of measuring test weight that meet the 

requirements of H 44 and that have successfully been NTEP evaluated and approved for 

test weight may now be used commercially to determine the test weight of grain. Due to 

the importance of the grain sample volume in the determination of test weight, the recent 

changes to H 44 Section 5.56(a) Paragraph S.2.6. include a non-retroactive requirement 

that, as of January 1, 2004, the meter must have means to ensure that the measurement of 

test weight per bushel is not displayed or printed when an insufficient sample volume is 

available to provide an accurate measurement. 

Many grain moisture meters are equipped with a feature for determining test weight. As 

inspectors begin to evaluate these devices they should reference the testing procedures for 

the test weight feature in H 44 Section 5.56(a) Paragraph N.1.1 and N.1.2. For States that 

require NTEP Certificates of Conformance (CC), the inspectors must also review the CC 

to verify that the test weight feature has been evaluated. 

If there are any questions, please contact G. Diane Lee by phone at 301-975-4405 or by 

e-mail at diane.lee@nist.gov.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-11-0000375

28-MAR-2014

11:54 AM
**Exhibit32.2**

 

*CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GraniteCity Food & Brewery Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterlyperiod ended June 29, 2003, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Monica A. Underwood, InterimChief Financial Officer and Corporate Controller of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 
| Dated: | August 8, 2003 | By     | /s/ Monica A. Underwood                                   |   |
|--------|---------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                |   | Monica A. Underwood                                       |
|   |                |   | Interim Chief Financial Officer and  Corporate Controller |

 

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 2069** 

RICHARD MARTIN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. BALTIMORE CITY POLICE , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. George Jarrod Hazel , District Judge. ( 8:15

- cv - 02430

- GJH )

Submitted : December 15, 2015 Decided: December 17, 2015

Before GREGORY and FLOYD , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Richard Martin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Richard Martin appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012). For the reasons that follow, we affirm. On appeal, Martin challenges the district court’s conclusion that his claims were untimely. Martin’s claims, whether brought under state law or 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), were subject to, at longest, a three

- year st atute of limitations.
See Md. Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 5

- 101 (2013) (general civil statute of limitations); Md. Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc.
§ 5

- 105 (2013) (actions for assault and defamation); Owens v. Balt. City State’s Attorneys Office , 767 F.3d 379, 388 (4th Cir. 2014) ( § 1983 claims), cert. denied , 135 S. Ct. 1893 (2015)
. While Martin’s malicious prosecution claim has not yet accrued, this claim is barred by his inability to meet the favorable termination requirement. See Heron v. Strader , 76 1 A.2d 56, 59 (Md. 2000). Contrary to Martin’s assertions, the facts alleged in the complaint demonstrate that his remaining claims accrued, at the latest, by the time he was released from prison, and the limitations period was not subject to tolling. Se e A Soc’y
W ithout a Name v. Virginia , 655 F.3d 342, 348 (4th Cir. 2011) (accrual under § 1983); Shailendra Kumar, P
. A . v. Dhanda , 43 A.3d 1029, 1034

- 34, 1039

- 41 (Md. 2012) ( discussing accrual and tolling under state law ); see also Nat’l Advert. Co. v. Raleigh ,3 947 F.2d 1158, 1166

- 67 (4th Cir. 1991) ( describing continuing violations doctrine). Finally, becau se Martin’s claims were properly dismissed, the district court committed no error in denying as moot Martin’s request to file electronically.
Accor dingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We deny Martin’s motions to seal and to compel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 31.02**

 

**Certifications**

 

I, James A. Cardwell, Jr., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Petro, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 31,2005 

/s/ James A. Cardwell, Jr.

    (James A. Cardwell, Jr.) 

    Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer****