alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Page 55 of 55

                                  EXHIBIT 10-13

                               CLOSING CERTIFICATE

         Pursuant to Section 5.04H. of that certain Note Purchase Agreement,
dated as of May 24, 2004 (the "PURCHASE AGREEMENT"), by and among GBC
Liquidating Corp., a New York corporation (the "SELLER"), and St. Paul
Associates, LLC, a New York limited liability company (the "BUYER"), the
undersigned does hereby certify, for and on behalf of Seller and in its name, as
follows:

         1.       Each of the representations and warranties of Seller contained
in the Purchase Agreement are true and correct in all material respects as of
the date hereof with the same effect as though such representations and
warranties had been made on and as of the date hereof (other than any
representation or warranty that is expressly made as of a specified date, which
was true and correct in all material respects as of such specified date), except
for such misrepresentations and inaccurate warranties as will not singly, or in
the aggregate, be reasonably expected to have a material adverse effect on the
Seller.

         2.       Seller has performed in all material respects all the
obligations to be performed by it prior to the date hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Seller has caused this Certificate to be executed,
for and on its behalf and in its name, by the undersigned on and as of this 24th
day of May, 2004.

                                               GBC LIQUIDATING CORP.

                                               By: /s/ Steven M. Morse
                                               Name: Steven M. Morse
                                               Title: Vice President & CFO
NOTES AND COMMENTS
ASSUMPTION PARISH THINGS HAPPEN
EVENTS 
PUBLIC PERCEPTION 

SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT
Exhibit
13.1





PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with this Annual Report of CalPetro Tankers (Bahamas III) Limited
(the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the annual period ended December 31, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or about the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tor Olav Trøim, the Principal Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.







Date:
June 30, 2008







/s/ Tor
Olav Trøim





Tor Olav
Trøim


Principal
Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 469 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        August 3, 1998.
Whereas the United States has a Cooperative Fire Suppression Agreement with 
        Canada to address the issue of fires occurring along the border between 
        the two countries;
Whereas in the past fires starting in Mexico have grown out of control and have 
        spread into the United States; and
Whereas both the United States Forest Service and the Mexican Forest Service 
        have expressed an interest in having a cooperative fire suppression 
        agreement between the United States and Mexico: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that the 
United States should initiate negotiations with Mexico at the earliest date 
possible in order to come to a mutually beneficial agreement as soon as possible 
addressing the concerns of both countries in suppressing fires occurring along 
the border between the two countries.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 495 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 495

Relating to the recognition of the connection between the emancipation 
  of African slaves in the Danish West Indies, now the United States 
 Virgin Islands, to the American Declaration of Independence from the 
                          British Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 1998

 Ms. Christian-Green (for herself, Ms. Kilpatrick, Ms. Jackson-Lee of 
    Texas, Mr. Jefferson, and Mr. Conyers) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Relating to the recognition of the connection between the emancipation 
  of African slaves in the Danish West Indies, now the United States 
 Virgin Islands, to the American Declaration of Independence from the 
                          British Government.

Whereas, prior to July 3, 1848, many Africans were held as slaves on the islands 
        of the Danish West Indies, now the United States Virgin Islands;
Whereas, on July 3, under the leadership of Moses ``General Buddhoe'' Gottlieb, 
        the African slaves on the Island of St. Croix responded to the signal of 
        the blowing of conch shells by leaving their plantations to converge on 
        Fort Frederik in the town of Frederiksted;
Whereas in Frederiksted the African slaves demanded their freedom and threatened 
        to destroy the island by fire unless it was granted by 4 o'clock that 
        afternoon;
Whereas, confronted by reports of arson and insurrection, the Danish governor, 
        Peter von Scholten, met the African slaves in Frederiksted and declared 
        that ``all unfree in the Danish West Indies are from today free'';
Whereas the heroes of this rebellion paid a high price, General Buddhoe being 
        sent into exile, and Governor von Scholten being convicted in Denmark of 
        dereliction of duty and of exceeding his authority;
Whereas the American people declared their independence from the British on July 
        4, 1776; and
Whereas the courage of these heroes serves to connect Virgin Islanders and all 
        Americans to their past and to reinforce their unwavering commitment to 
        preserve, protect, and defend freedom: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives urges--
            (1) the American people to recognize the historical 
        significance of the emancipation of African slaves in what is 
        now the United States Virgin Islands; and
            (2) Virgin Islanders and all Americans to maintain their 
        unwavering commitment to preserve, protect, and defend human 
        rights and freedom.
                                 <all>
```
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 336

To inform the Senate that a quorum of the House has assembled.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 27, 1998

Mr. ARMEY submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

To inform the Senate that a quorum of the House has

assembled.

1 Resolved, That the Clerk of the House inform the

2 Senate that a quorum of the House is present and that

3 the House is ready to proceed with business.

Æ
#### Maria Guadalupe FRANCO, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-72825, [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 6, 2004.*

Decided Dec. 20, 2004.

Maria Guadalupe Franco, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.

*612Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, San Francisco, CA, Carol Federighi, M. Jocelyn Wright, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable *612for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Maria Guadalupe Franco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. We dismiss the petition for review.

Franco has waived any challenge to the BIA’s determination that her motion to reopen was not timely filed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), by not raising this issue in her opening brief. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir.1996).

We do not review Franco’s challenge to the immigration judge’s hardship determination, which was considered and rejected by this Court in *Franco v. Ashcroft,*02-73201. *See Merritt v. Mackey,*932 F.2d 1317, 1320 (9th Cir.1991).

All pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by the Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I,Frederick F. Wolfe, certify that:

 

1.                                       Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc.;

 

2.                                       Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;

 

3.                                       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this Report;

 

4.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this Report is being prepared;

 

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this Report based on such evaluation; and

 

----

 

c)Disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: March23, 2005

 

 
| /s/ Frederick F. Wolfe  |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|
| Frederick F. Wolfe      |   |
|                    |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Everett McKinley Dirksen UnitedStatesCourthouse

Room2722 - 219 S. Dearborn Street

Chicago, Illinois60604

Office of the Clerk

Phone: (312) 435-5850

www.ca7.uscourts.gov

NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF MANDATE

August 4, 2020

To: Thomas G. Bruton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of Illinois

Chicago , IL 60604-0000

No. 20-1811

ELIM ROMANIAN PENTECOSTAL CHURCH, et al.,

Plaintiffs - Appellants

v.

JAY R. PRITZKER, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of

Illinois,

Defendant - Appellee

Originating Case Information:

District Court No: 1:20-cv-02782

Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division

District Judge Robert W. Gettleman

Herewith is the mandate of this court in this appeal, along with the Bill of Costs, if any. A

certified copy of the opinion/order of the court and judgment, if any, and any direction as to

costs shall constitute the mandate.

RECORD ON APPEAL STATUS: No record to be returned

NOTE TO COUNSEL:

Case: 20-1811 Document: 00713657319 Filed: 08/04/2020 Pages: 2

Case: 1:20-cv-02782 Document #: 53 Filed: 08/04/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:632
If any physical and large documentary exhibits have been filed in the above-entitled cause, they are

to be withdrawn ten (10) days from the date of this notice. Exhibits not withdrawn during this period

will be disposed of.

Please acknowledge receipt of these documents on the enclosed copy of this notice.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Received above mandate and record, if any, from the Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals for the

Seventh Circuit.

Date: Received by:

_________________________ ____________________________________

form name: c7_Mandate(form ID: 135)

Case: 20-1811 Document: 00713657319 Filed: 08/04/2020 Pages: 2

Case: 1:20-cv-02782 Document #: 53 Filed: 08/04/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:633
H. Res. 489

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 25, 1998.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 4112) making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1999,

and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be

dispensed with. Points of order against consideration of the

bill for failure to comply with clause 2(l)(6) of rule XI, clause

3 or 7 of rule XXI, or section 401 of the Congressional

Budget Act of 1974 are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member

of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the

bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute

rule and shall be considered as read. Points of order against

provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 or

6 of rule XXI are waived except as follows: page 10, line 1
2

•HRES 489 EH

through line 10. No amendment shall be in order except those

printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each amendment may be considered only

in the order printed in the report, may be offered only by a

Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read,

shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally

divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent,

and shall not be subject to amendment. All points of order

against amendments printed in the report are waived. The

Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone

until a time during further consideration in the Committee of

the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment;

and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another

electronic vote without intervening business, provided that the

minimum time for electronic voting on the first in any series

of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise

and report the bill to the House with such amendments as

may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to
3

•HRES 489 EH

final passage without intervening motion except one motion

to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 33 Agreed to House (ATH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 33

 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 1997

 Mr. Fazio of California submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and he is hereby, 
elected to the following standing committee:
    Committee on Commerce: Mr. Sawyer of Ohio, to rank directly below 
Mr. Engel of New York.
                                 <all>
```
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00368-CV

IN RE HARDING-CONLEY-DRAWERT-TINCH INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. a/k/a 

HCDT INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., PAUL POETTGEN, MARYANNA 

CHRISTENSEN AND JOYCE TINCH, AS HEIR TO ACE TINCH, DECEASED

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 1, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On May 26, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered 

relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. 

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011-PC-1086, styled In re Estate of Allen C. Tinch Jr., Deceased, 

pending in the Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Tom Rickhoff presiding.
#### F. B. Johnson *v.*J. M. Mullen's Assignee.

Trial — Two Verdicts Against Appellant — Court of Appeals Will Not Reverse Unless for Errors of-Law.

This cause having been twice tried by a jury and in each instance the verdict was adverse to the appellant; such being the facts the Court of Appeals will not reverse the judgment, except for errors of law oecuring on the trial in the court *below.*

Witness — Personal Attendance of — Demand for Personal Attendance— Other Party May Take Deposition.

The fact that one party demands the personal attendance of a witness does not prevent the other from taking the deposition of such witness and reading it on the trial of the cause, provided the party demanding the presence of the witness goes to trial without it.

APPEAL FROM MARION CIRCUIT COURT.

October 14, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay;

This catise has been twice tried by a jury. In each instance the verdict was adverse to the appellant.

Such being the facts this court will' not reverse the judgment complained of, except for errors of law occurring in the trial in the court below.

Miller was a competent witness in behalf of his assignee. His discharge in bankruptcy by the United States District Court divested him of all interest in the Miller controversy.

*562
      *Russell & Averitt, for appellant.*

*Thomas, Harrison, for appellee.*

The fact that a proceeding was pending against him in said court to set aside and annul his discharge did not render him incompetent; the possibility that such proceeding might result in a judgment against him is a fact which goes to his credibility and not to his competency. The court did not err in refusing to exclude from the jury the deposition of Kirk.

It was the appellant who demanded the personal attendance of the witness, and the process of the court to compel his attendance was issued at his instance and not at that of the appellee.

Section 616 of the Civil Code authorizes the court at its discretion in a proper state of case to compel the personal attendance of a witness who may be otherwise exempt therefrom. But the fact that one party demands his personal presence does not prevent the other from taking the deposition of such witness, and reading it on the trial of the cause, provided the party demanding the presence of the witness goes to trial without it.

The instructions given upon the trial are unexceptionable and embody the whole law of the case.

Judgment affirmed.
Vulnerability Detection Systems

ted@biometix.com

Biometix – www.biometix.com

Use of scores, quality or meta-data to 

identify vulnerabilities
Vulnerability Detection using the Zoo
Vulnerability Detection using the Zoo
Vulnerability Detection using Self 

Organization and Meta-Data
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 349 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      February 5, 1998.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (S. 1575) to rename the Washington National 
Airport located in the District of Columbia and Virginia as the ``Ronald Reagan 
Washington National Airport''. The bill shall be considered as read for 
amendment. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to 
final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure; and (2) one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### L. C. Reed *v.*Benjamin Martin.

Tria! — Verdict—Evidence, Preponderance of.

If the finding of a jury is not palpably wrong, a reversal cannot be had upon the sole ground that the evidence preponderates against the verdict.

APPEAL PROM OWEN CIRCUIT COURT.

December 14, 1871.

*565Chief Justice Pryor did not sit in this case.

*Craddock & Trdbue, appellant.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The three instructions given upon the trial of this action correctly expounded the law of this case, and there is certainly proof in the record conducing to establish the state of facts upon which the two instructions given at the instance of appellee were hypothicated.

The finding of the jury is not palpably wrong, and a reversal cannot be had upon the sole ground that the evidence preponderates against the verdict upon which appellees judgment is founded.

Judgment affirmed.