alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Minga Guy TSHILEMBI, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States of America, Respondent.

No. 04-1654.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 30, 2004.

Decided Dec. 29, 2004.

Minga Guy Tshilembi, Petitioner pro se. Calvin McCormick, Immigration and Naturalization, Baltimore, Maryland; Thomas Ward Hussey, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Victor Matthew Lawrence, Michelle Elizabeth Gorden, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Minga Guy Tshilembi, a native and citizen of the Democratic Republic of Congo, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. Tshilembi challenges the IJ’s finding that he failed to present credible testimony and thus did not meet his burden of proof to qualify for asylum.

To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that the IJ’s negative credibility findings are supported by specific, cogent reasons. *Figeroa v. INS,*886 F.2d 76, 78 (4th Cir.1989). Accordingly, Tshilembi fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Having failed to qualify for asylum on this ground, Tshilembi cannot meet the higher *294standard to qualify for withholding of removal. *Chen v. INS,*195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir.1999); *INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca,*480 U.S. 421, 430, 107 S.Ct. 1207, 94 L.Ed.2d 434 (1987).

Finally, we lack jurisdiction over Tshilembi’s challenge to the denial of protection under the Convention Against Torture because he failed to properly exhaust this claim in his appeal to the Board. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) (2000); *Asika v. Ashcroft,*362 F.3d 264, 267 n. 3 (4th Cir.2004), *petition for cert. filed,*— U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 861, — LEd.2d -, 73 U.S.L.W. 3135 (2004).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
As of January 2024

NICE COMMUNITY COORDINATING COUNCIL

2024 MEETING SCHEDULE

Meeting times will take place the fourth Tuesday of every month at 3:30PM 

Eastern Time to serve members from different time zones. 

January 23, 2024 Weds.

February 27, 2024 Weds.

March 26, 2024 Weds.

April 23, 2024 Weds.

May 28, 2024 Weds.

June 25, 2024 Weds.

July 23, 2024 Weds.

August 2024 No meeting

September 24, 2024 Tues.

October 22, 2024 Tues.

November 2024 No Meeting

December 3 2024 Tues.

All meetings will be held through the WebEx Event platform. 

If you are a new member, please add a meeting hold to your calendar for each 

meeting. New members will receive the official calendar invite from the NICE 

Program Office one week prior to the meeting date.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer ofHyperSpace Communications, Inc. (the “*Company*”)hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i) theaccompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscalyear  ended December 31, 2004 (the “*Report*”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|               | /s/  Mark Endry          |
|--------------------|--------------------------|
| March 31,2005 | Mark  Endry              |
|               | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

1

----
From: naenaelowe

Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 2:16:01 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)

To: aiframework <aiframework@nist.gov>

Subject: Re: Second Announcement for AI RMF Comments and Workshop

HI,

Have we considered adding for govern-5 that we should have a process in place for 

continuous review lifecycle if an AI model needs updating if incorrect over time?

Michell

On Thursday, September 29, 2022 at 02:09:55 PM EDT, naenaelowe wrote: 

HI,

Should we add in govern-1 that risks are not bias?

On Thursday, September 29, 2022 at 01:53:45 PM EDT, naenaelowe wrote: 

HI,

I was reading the playbook and wondered if for govern-3 we should have reference to 

include privacy concerns as well.

MIchell Singleton
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  163,754
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,328,611
<PP&E>                                       1,332,670
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,709,345
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          946,294
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        115
<COMMON>                                     1,214,116
<OTHER-SE>                                     298,820
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,709,345
<SALES>                                        534,825
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               534,825
<CGS>                                        1,887,383
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,176,207
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,630
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,654,205)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (3,654,205)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 41,667
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,612,335)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.14)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

v. )

)

WILMER ALEXANDER GARCIA MEZA, )

aka “Alejandro Garcia” and )

“Alex Garcia,” ) 

)

Defendant. )

_______________________________________)

No. 20 CR 35

Judge Elaine E. Bucklo

STATUS REPORT

The United States of America, by and through its attorney, David A. 

Hubbert, Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Tax Division, Department of 

Justice, respectfully submits this status report.

Procedural History and Status

On August 4, 2022, this Court entered an order directing the parties to file a 

joint status report on or before August 10, 2022. ECF No. 81. 

On May 25, 2022, the defendant pleaded guilty to mail fraud, in violation of 

18 U.S.C. § 1341, and aggravated identity theft, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A.

ECF Nos. 74, 75.

There are currently no outstanding motions. The defendant is released on a

$130,000 bond partially secured by real property.

A sentencing hearing is set for August 19, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. The 

government attempted to confer with defense counsel to determine whether the 

Case: 1:20-cr-00035 Document #: 83 Filed: 08/10/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:357
2

defendant has agreed to proceed by video or telephone conference, but did not 

receive a response. The government has no objection to proceeding with the 

sentencing hearing by video or telephone conference. 

Respectfully submitted,

DAVID A. HUBBERT

Deputy Assistant Attorney General

Tax Division, Department of Justice

By: /s/ Jacob M. Green

 JACOB M. GREEN

 THOMAS W. FLYNN

 Trial Attorneys

 Counsel for the United States

Dated: August 10, 2022

Case: 1:20-cr-00035 Document #: 83 Filed: 08/10/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:358
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 
 
 
 Certification of Principal Accounting
Officer Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 
 
 In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Rotoblock Corporation
(Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Richard Di Stefano, Principal Accounting Officer, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:
 
 (1) the
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) the
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
 
 
 Date: August
11,
2009 ROTOBLOCK
CORPORATION
 
 /s/ 
Richard Di Stefano
 By:
Richard Di Stefano, Chief Financial Officer/Principal Accounting Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-9919-32-OA]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act,                               ( print page 68441)                            Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that the next meeting of the Children's Health Protection Advisory Committee (CHPAC) will be held December 2 and 3, 2014 at Marriott Metro Center, 775 12th Street NW., Washington, DC 20408). The CHPAC was created to advise the Environmental Protection Agency on science, regulations, and other issues relating to children's environmental health.                    

# DATES:

The CHPAC will meet December 2 and 3, 2014.

# ADDRESSES:

755 12th Street NW., Washington, DC 20408.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Martha Berger, Office of Children's Health Protection, USEPA, MC 1107A, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 564-2191 or                         *berger.martha@epa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The meetings of the CHPAC are open to the public. The CHPAC will meet on December 2 from 1:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. and December 3 from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. The Agenda will include discussions regarding the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for lead, the EPA/FDA Fish Advisory, and other EPA actions that affect children's health. A complete and final agenda will be posted at                     *epa.gov/children.*

*Access and Accommodations:*                     For information on access or services for individuals with disabilities, please contact Martha Berger at 202-564-2191 or                     *berger.martha@epa.gov.*

Dated: November 4, 2014.

Martha Berger,

Designated Federal Official. 

[FR Doc. 2014-27130 Filed 11-14-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, William T. Freeman, Chief Executive Officer, in connection with the amended Report on Form 10-K/A of McCormick & Schmicks Seafood
Restaurants, Inc. for the annual period ended December 26, 2009 (the Report), hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
McCormick & Schmicks Seafood Restaurants, Inc.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ WILLIAM T. FREEMAN 
|William T. Freeman     
|Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 20, 2010
ANSI/NIST Fingerprint S

Update Worksho

Gaithersburg, Maryland

April 26-28, 2005
© 2004 SEARCH, The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statist

IEPD Goals and Objec

Define IEPDs (Information Excha

Documentation) to support int

among justice systems

Expand and refine GJXDM/DD th

experienced feedback; resolve definitions

Constrain/restrict down to key c

support interoperability 
© 2004 SEARCH, The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statist

IEPD Goals and Objec

Justice exchange data does not 

one domain

• Example: Protection Order 

court document

• LEA is an exchange partner• FBI is an exchange partner

Most important: a group of repr

exchange partners working thbusiness and technical requireexchange
© 2004 SEARCH, The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statist

IEPD Process

• JIEM• Domain Modeling• GJXDM Mapping• Subset Schema (SSGT)• Extension, Document, Constr• Sample XML Instance• Packaging• Horizontal Analysis/Reuse• Education and Outreach
© 2004 SEARCH, The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statist

Process to Build IEPD

Assemble a team of domain 

model/schema structure ex
© 2004 SEARCH, The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statist

Domain Modeling
© 2004 SEARCH, The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statist

GJXDM Mapping Sprea
© 2004 SEARCH, The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statist
© 2004 SEARCH, The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statist

Packaging

• Subset Schema• Constraint Schema• Extension Schema• Document Schema• Sample XML Instance• IEPD
© 2004 SEARCH, The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statist

Law Enforcement Reference IEPDs

SEARCH is leading this effort, w

from the Community Oriented Services (COPS) office of the Justice

• Incident Reporting/Incident • Field Investigation Report• Arrest/Booking Information• LEA Referral/Prosecution Ch

Horizontal Analysis conducted fo

completion of these four docu

Artifacts posted on SEARCH web

to OJP Clearinghouse
© 2004 SEARCH, The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statist

IEPD Goals and Objec

Remember: the goal is to exchan

not to build databases

The more we standardize the con

payload of components, the moour goals 

Standard, non-proprietary, consis

structured artifacts helps all of IEPDs as models for information 

Thank you!

Catherine Plummer

catherine.plummer@search

www.search.org
ANSI/NIST Fingerprint S

Update Worksho

Gaithersburg, Maryland

April 26-28, 2005
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 72

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Agriculture in

the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 13, 1997

Mr. SMITH of Oregon submitted the following resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on House Oversight

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on

Agriculture in the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Agriculture

4 (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Commit5 tee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House

7 of Representatives for the Committee salaries and ex8 penses, not more than $7,792,162.00 for the One Hun9 dred Fifth Congress.
2

HRES 72 IH

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

2 Of the amount specified in section 1—

3 (1) not more than $3,851,039.00 shall be avail4 able for expenses incurred during the period begin5 ning at noon on January 3, 1997, and ending imme6 diately before noon on January 3, 1998; and

7 (2) not more than $3,941,123.00 shall be avail8 able for expenses incurred during the period begin9 ning at noon on January 3, 1998, and ending imme10 diately before noon on January 3, 1999.

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner

15 directed by the Committee on House Oversight.

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by

19 the Committee on House Oversight.

Æ
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 71

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Transportation

and Infrastructure in the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 13, 1997

Mr. SHUSTER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Oversight

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on

Transportation and Infrastructure in the One Hundred

Fifth Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Transportation

4 and Infrastructure (hereinafter in this resolution referred

5 to as the ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff

6 salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts

7 of the House of Representatives for committee salaries

8 and expenses, not more than $14,096,282 for the One

9 Hundred Fifth Congress.
2

•HRES 71 IH

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

2 Of the amount specified in section 1—

3 (1) not more than $7,042,725 shall be available

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

5 noon on January 3, 1997, and ending immediately

6 before noon on January 3, 1998; and

7 (2) not more than $7,053,557 shall be available

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

9 noon on January 3, 1998, and ending immediately

10 before noon on January 3, 1999.

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner

15 directed by the Committee on House Oversight.

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by

19 the Committee on House Oversight.

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Astronaut Rick Mastracchio Available for Interviews after Space Station Mission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"uWJYClDmVB\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-astronaut-rick-mastracchio-available-for-interviews-after-space-station-mission\/\">NASA Astronaut Rick Mastracchio Available for Interviews after Space Station Mission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-astronaut-rick-mastracchio-available-for-interviews-after-space-station-mission\/embed\/#?secret=uWJYClDmVB\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Astronaut Rick Mastracchio Available for Interviews after Space Station Mission” — NASA\" data-secret=\"uWJYClDmVB\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/s132-e-007808.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":410}
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§ 1350)




I,
Randall J. Frapart, of US Dataworks, Inc. certify pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(i)           the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”),
which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(ii)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of US Dataworks, Inc. as of
the dates and for the periods expressed in the report.




Dated:  August
14, 2009




/ s/ Randall J. FrapartRandall
      J. FrapartChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)