alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N

5 | 02 KEARNY RURAL

—fiNAL ELECTIONS

PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORS-ELECTORES PRESIDENCIALES [.
VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN OTE POR NO MAS DE 1 i:
fin = = —— T — | tas
BOOTH, DENNIS McCOY. LaVELLE [*s,
ARPAIO, JOE CROCKETT, WEBB MINNAUGH, SUSAN © BUSH 27
BARBER, LINDA FANNIN, PAUL ROBERT STRAKA, FRANK (REP) I}.
a etsas Gs Tt ie
HUGGINS, CHARLES RIOS, PETE {i's
ANDERSON, ELSPETH LEWIS, JEWELL M TIPPECONNIC, ALBERTA C. | GORE 3 > i} S.
HAMILTON, ARTHUR M McNULTY, JIM WARNER, CAROLYN (DEM) | ee ge
HAGGARD, MICHAEL T HORNING, MARK j Ht ee
ANDREASEN, JAMESERIC HANCOCK. ERNEST RENZULU, MIKE SMITH 4 > Ree te. eae
OUSGER, MIKE HORNING, JENNIFER SCHAUBLE, PAUL L. (LBT) i \| - est
— - a - _ — — r meme (ee 1 fas
KELLY, J. LYNNE RCOUSH, DOROTHY E. ye ' a,
GILBERT. JOHN KERKMAN, EUGENE J WITTENBERG, MARGOT BUCHANAN 5 > hen -
GILBERT, SANDRA. QUINN, ROSELLA E WITTENBERG, RUSS (RPA) | yh! arene
CAMPBELL, CAROLYN MARTIN, THERESA ie akee
BOLGER, MARY “KATIE” EASON. ARI MINZIKAH, CELESTE NADER 6 > [!: tee
BURKHOLDER, JAMES GREEN, MICHAEL SILK, MARGARET (GRN) a If i See
Sane : I it's *
HANSEN, KATHLEEN AUT ROMAINE, EVELYN Row wigs
Gi3SON, PRESTON HANSEN. KENH EDWARD HOMAING JAMES HAGELIN | 7 > i PSS *
GIBSON. SIDNEY LESSARD, ELIZABETH = ROMAINE. WILLIAM (NLP) | [}. Re
r ie - ~ a ris
UNITED STATES SENATOR-SENADOR FEDERAL Bo Pepace: ae
en OO _ rn | i a
KYL, JON (REP); 9 > [ens
oe | rit ,
VOTE FOR NOT | ts
MAGE TUT HESS, BARRY J., I! (eT) 10» |
pcs
, os L" r Livi
voTe PORNO | HANSEN, VANCE (GRN) | 11 B® fe
MAS DE 1 ae
| TOEL, WILLIAM (INDEPENDENT) | 12 > bee
eee — =e — eee Se a a } PaaseaNh

U.S. REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS-DIPUTADO FEDERAL EN EL CONGRESO

Be
DISTRICT 6-DISTAITO 6 re
- ene a ae
VOTE FOR NOT HAYWORTH, J.D. (REP) | 14 > It :
MORE THAN 1 7 i
| NELSON, LARRY (DEM) | 15 >
VOTE POR NO ; +
MAS DE 1 DUNCAN, RICHARD (BT) | 16 >» i
Sl [ = 4 li
[*
on AR
bi Bs 09
pa
ae "ae
["
i
[:
ee
IRR GET oe Te er ene UR OLS. ee
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 606 Agreed to House (ATH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 606

 Providing for an organizational caucus or conference in the House of 
          Representatives for the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 1998

       Pursuant to H. Res. 594; considered as having been adopted

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for an organizational caucus or conference in the House of 
          Representatives for the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

    Resolved, That any organizational caucus or conference in the House 
of Representatives for the One Hundred Sixth Congress may begin on or 
after November 13, 1998.
    Sec. 2. As used in this resolution, the term ``organizational 
caucus or conference'' means a party caucus or conference authorized to 
be called under section 202(a) of House Resolution 988, Ninety-third 
Congress, agreed to on October 8, 1974, and enacted into permanent law 
by chapter III of title I of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1975 
(2 U.S.C. 29a(a)).
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001049505
<NAME> NEW WORLD PUBLISHING INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                             231
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     26,760
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,991
<PP&E>                                          16,316
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,692)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,615
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,740
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,875
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,615
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,183
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,183)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,183)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>See notes to condensed financial statements
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
23.2





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
PETROLEUM ENGINEER





CONSENT
OF FORREST A. GARB & ASSOCIATES, INC.,


INDEPENDENT
PETROLEUM ENGINEERS





As
independent petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to the reference of our
estimates of reserves as of December 31, 2008 included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of South Texas Oil Company, Inc.





FORREST
      A. GARB & ASSOCIATES, INC.FORREST
      A. GARB & ASSOCIATES, INC.By:William
      D. Harris IIICEO
      &
President





Dallas,
Texas





March 18,
2009
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

OAKLEY, INC., 

 Plaintiff,

v.

ALL-INBIKE, et al.,

 Defendants.

Case No. 20-cv-03542

Judge Robert W. Gettleman

Magistrate Judge Young B. Kim

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL UNDER RULE 41(a)(1)

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. 

(“Plaintiff”) hereby dismisses this action with prejudice against the following Defendant:

Defendant Name Line No.

mingyuankejimaoyivip 28

Dated this 17th day of July 2020. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jake M. Christensen

Amy C. Ziegler

Justin R. Gaudio

Jake M. Christensen

Thomas J. Juettner

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500

Chicago, Illinois 60606

312.360.0080 / 312.360.9315 (facsimile)

aziegler@gbc.law

jgaudio@gbc.law

jchristensen@gbc.law

tjjuettner@gbc.law

Counsel for Plaintiff Oakley, Inc.

Case: 1:20-cv-03542 Document #: 45 Filed: 07/17/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:3422
EXHIBIT 1 

Case: 3:20-cv-50286 Document #: 73-3 Filed: 03/04/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:935
1

Hill, et al. v. Mercy Health Corporation, et al.

Court File No: 3:20-cv-50286

(April 1, 2020 – February 28, 2022)

Lodestar by Nichols Kaster, PLLP Time Keeper:

Partners:

Name Years of 

Experience

Billing Rate 

Per Hour Hours Charges

Paul Lukas 31 $925 010.8 $9,990.00

Kai Richter 23 $825 080.9 $66,742.50

Brock Specht 15 $700 049.7 $34,790.00

Brandon McDonough 10 $650 099.3 $64,545.00

Associate Attorneys:

Name Years of 

Experience

Billing Rate 

Per Hour Hours Charges

Jacob Schutz 9 $575 000.4 $230.00

Chloe Raimey 6 $500 009.0 $4,500.00

Patricia Dana 3 $450 376.2 $169,290.00

Law Clerks/Paralegals/Support Staff:

Name Billing Rate 

Per Hour Hours Charges

Karla Pathmann $250 045.5 $11,375.00

Heather O’Neil $250 000.5 $125.00

Angi Kittelson $250 000.5 $125.00

Cameron Pylka $250 004.4 $1,100.00

Steve Eiden $250 013.1 $3,275.00

Jennifer Schiefert $250 003.0 $750.00

Nichols Kaster, PLLP Total Hours (Attorneys and Support Staff): 693.3

 

The Prinz Law Firm Total Hours (Attorneys and Support Staff): 3.9

Walcheske & Luzi, LLC: 51.5 

GRAND TOTAL HOURS (ALL COUNSEL): 748.7

Nichols Kaster, PLLP Lodestar Total (Attorneys and Support Staff): $366,837.50

The Prinz Law Firm Lodestar Total (Attorneys and Support Staff): $1,213.50

Case: 3:20-cv-50286 Document #: 73-3 Filed: 03/04/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:936
2

Walcheske & Luzi, LLC (Attorneys and Support Staff): $22,745.00

GRAND TOTAL LODESTAR (ALL COUNSEL): $390,796.00

Case: 3:20-cv-50286 Document #: 73-3 Filed: 03/04/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:937
**Exhibit 32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18 U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Annual Report of Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Francis T. Joyce, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge and belief:





(1) the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Francis
                T. JoyceFrancis
                T. JoyceChief
                Financial OfficerFebruary
                28, 2008




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with the annual report of Mercantile Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ted T. Awerkamp, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.     The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.


/s/ Ted T. AwerkampTed T. Awerkamp

President and Chief Executive Officer



April 15, 2011
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

DERVAIL D. PICKENS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

WALMART INC., 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-02933 

Class Action 

The Honorable John Robert Blakey 

DEFENDANT WALMART INC.’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION 

OF TIME TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE 

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

Defendant Walmart Inc. (“Walmart”), through its counsel, and by agreement of Plaintiff 

Dervail Pickens (“Plaintiff”), respectfully requests that the Court extend the deadline for Walmart 

to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint to and including July 30, 2020. In 

support of its Motion, Walmart states as follows: 

1. The Complaint in this Action was filed on May 18, 2020 (Dkt. No. 1). 

2. Plaintiff served Comcast with the Complaint on June 9, 2020 (Dkt. No. 9). 

3. Walmart’s deadline to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint is June 

30, 2020. Id.

4. Walmart has recently retained counsel and is currently reviewing the allegations of 

the Complaint. Walmart therefore respectfully requests a 30-day extension of time through July 

30, 2020 to answer, move, or otherwise respond. 

5. This is Walmart’s first request for an extension of time. 

6. Counsel for Walmart has conferred with counsel for Plaintiff regarding this motion, 

and counsel for Plaintiff does not oppose the requested extension. 

Case: 1:20-cv-02933 Document #: 15 Filed: 06/15/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:60
2 

WHEREFORE, Walmart respectfully requests that its deadline to respond to the 

Complaint be extended to July 30, 2020. 

Dated: June 15, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Tia C. Ghattas 

Tia C. Ghattas 

COZEN O’CONNOR 

123 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 1800 

Chicago, IL 60606 

Telephone: 312-382-3148 

Email: tghattas@cozen.com 

Meredith C. Slawe (pro hac vice pending) 

COZEN O’CONNOR 

One Liberty Place 

1650 Market Street, Suite 2800 

Philadelphia, PA 19103 

Telephone: 215-665-4175 

mslawe@cozen.com 

E. Marie Bussey-Garza (pro hac vice pending) 

COZEN O’CONNOR 

1717 Main Street, Suite 3100 

Dallas, TX 75201 

Telephone: 214-462-3085 

mbussey-garza@cozen.com 

Counsel for Defendant 

Walmart Inc. 

Case: 1:20-cv-02933 Document #: 15 Filed: 06/15/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:61
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on June 15, 2020, I electronically filed Defendant Walmart Inc.’s 

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff’s 

Complaint using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all current 

counsel of record. 

/s/ Tia C. Ghattas 

Tia C. Ghattas 

Case: 1:20-cv-02933 Document #: 15 Filed: 06/15/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:62
2024 Expert and Consultant Daily Wages 

Based on the OPM Salary Table 2024-GS 

Effective January 14, 2024

The following is a table of compensation rates for Experts and Consultants identifying per diem rates based on the first and the tenth 

step of GS-13, GS-14, and GS-15. As in the past, we suggest the use of a rate that equates to the first step of the appropriate grade. 

With supporting documentation, a higher rate may be justified to match the private sector salary of the appointee.

Per Diem Salary Scale

Daily 

Minimum

Daily 

Maximum

GS-13 range $ 88,520- $ 115,079 $ 339.28 $ 441.12

GS-14 range $ 104,604 - $ 135,987 $ 400.96 $ 521.28

GS-15 range $ 123,041 - $ 159,950 $ 471.68 $ 613.12

NOTE: The process of increasing the pay of an Expert or Consultant is not automatic and requires the submission of a Request for 

Personnel Action, SF-52.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001049510
<NAME> ACME TELEVISION, LLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,986
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,856
<ALLOWANCES>                                       911
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,879
<PP&E>                                          30,450
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,336
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 353,331
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,854
<BONDS>                                        175,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     118,540
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   353,331
<SALES>                                         53,432
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,432
<CGS>                                           39,381
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,215
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (13,146)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (14,771)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,929)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,716
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,213)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,213)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
STALEY,
OKADA & PARTNERS


Chartered
Accountants




Suite 400 - 889 West Pender
      Street
              Vancouver, BC Canada V6C
      3B2
              Tel 604
      694-6070
              Fax 604
      585-3800
              info@staleyokada.com
              www.staleyokada.com




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED
ACCOUNTANTS






We
consent to the use of our report dated July 7, 2006 (except as to Note 12, which
is as of July 18, 2006) relating to the consolidated financial statements of
Rotoblock Corporation and to the reference to our firm in the
Form 10K-SB.






Vancouver,
BC /s/
Staley, Okada & Partners




October
31, 2007




STALEY,
OKADA & PARTNERS


Chartered
Accountants
Case: 1:20-cv-04314 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/23/20 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1
Case: 1:20-cv-04314 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/23/20 Page 2 of 8 PageID #:2
Case: 1:20-cv-04314 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/23/20 Page 3 of 8 PageID #:3
Case: 1:20-cv-04314 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/23/20 Page 4 of 8 PageID #:4
Case: 1:20-cv-04314 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/23/20 Page 5 of 8 PageID #:5
Case: 1:20-cv-04314 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/23/20 Page 6 of 8 PageID #:6
Case: 1:20-cv-04314 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/23/20 Page 7 of 8 PageID #:7
Case: 1:20-cv-04314 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/23/20 Page 8 of 8 PageID #:8
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19D0173. MILTON MITCHELL v. THE STATE.

In 1984, Milton Mitchell pled guilty and was found guilty of multiple offense

in multiple cases. On November 1, 2018, Mitchell filed this pro se application for

discretionary appeal seeking review of three trial court orders - an order dismissing

his motion to set aside void judgments, an order denying his extraordinary motion for

new trial, and an order denying his motion for out-of-time appeal. The orders

attached to the application were signed on August 14, 2018 and August 16, 2018, but

were not stamped “filed” as required by Court of Appeals Rule 31 (e). A stamped

“filed” copy is required in order for this Court to ascertain that the application was

filed within 30 days of the order being challenged, which is a jurisdictional

prerequisite. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d) (application must be filed within 30 days of the

entry of the order appealed); Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57)

(1989) (OCGA § 5-6-35 requirements are jurisdictional).

On October 6, 2018, thisCourt directed Mitchell to supplement the application

with stamped “filed” copies of the orderssought to be appealed within 10 days of the

October 6 order. We noted that failure to comply with this directive would result in

dismissal of his application. Because more than 10 days have passed since we issued

the October 6 order and Mitchell has failed to file stamped “filed” copies of the

orders, his application is hereby DISMISSED.

November 28, 2018
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/28/2018
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

ANNUALMASTER SERVICER’S CERTIFICATE

 

GEDEALER FLOORPLAN MASTER NOTE TRUST

 

March 21,2013

 

The undersigned, aduly authorized officer of General Electric Capital Corporation (“GECC”), as the master servicer (the “MasterServicer”), pursuant to the Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement dated as of June 30, 2006 (as may be further amendedand supplemented from time to time, the “Agreement”), between GECC and GE Dealer Floorplan Master Note Trust(“Trust”), does hereby certify that:

 

1.	GECCis, as of the date hereof, Master Servicer under the Agreement.

 

2.	The undersigned is an authorized officerwho is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this certificate to the Trust.

 

3.	A review of the activities of MasterServicer during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 (the “reporting period”), and of its performance under theAgreement, has been made under my supervision.

 

4.	To the best of my knowledge, basedon such review, Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout thereporting period.  

 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has duly executed this certificate the date first above written.

 

 

/s/ Thomas A. Davidson
Exhibit 32



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pliant Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Jack E. Knott II, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Brian E. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify as follows,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to the best of our knowledge:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/    JACK E. KNOTT
II
|Jack E. Knott II       
|Chief Executive Officer



August 12, 2003

|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/    BRIAN E.
JOHNSON
|Brian E. Johnson       
|Chief Financial Officer



August 12, 2003



37
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11** 

**- 2058** 

REN FANG LUO

,

Petitioner

,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General

,

Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : March 15, 2012 Decided: April 11, 2012

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Gary J. Yerman, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Alison Marie Igoe, Lyle D. Jen tzer, Senior Litigation Counsel

, Office of Immigration Litigation,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Ren Fang Luo, a native and citizen of China, petitions

for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(Board) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We

have reviewed the administrative record and Luo’s claims and

find no abuse of discretion in the denial of relief on his

motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2011). We accordingly

deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the

Board. See In re: Luo (B.I.A. Sept. 12, 2011). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED