alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Irma Wahjudi SHALIMAR; et al., Petitioners, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-73178.

Agency Nos. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ], [ AXX-XXX-XXX ], [ AXX-XXX-XXX ], [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Dec. 8, 2004.

Decided Dec. 27, 2004.

Irma Wahjudi Shalimar, Rexburg, ID, pro se.

Hendra Wahjudi, Rexburg, ID, Monica Schurtman, University of Idaho Legal Aid Clinic College of Law, Moscow, ID, for Petitioners.

Caesar Wahjudi, Rexburg, ID, pro se.

Chrysta Wahjudi, Rexburg, ID, Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, WWS — -District Counsel, Immigration and Naturalization Service Office of the District Counsel, Seattle, WA, Jennifer A. Parker, Hillel Smith, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before HAWKINS, THOMAS, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Petitioners Irma Shalimar Wahjudi and Hendra, Caesar, and Chrysta Wahjudi (the ‘Wahjudis”) petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s denial of their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We do not have jurisdiction to review the merits of the Wahjudis’ case because their petition was untimely filed, *see*8 U.S.C. § 1252(b), and the circumstances do not rise to the level of “unique circumstances” under which “the late notice may be deemed to have been constructively filed within the jurisdictional time limits.” *Hernandez-Rivera v. INS,*630 F.2d 1352, 1355 (9th Cir.1980).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
NIST HB 133-2024 

November 2023

ix

Author Contributions 

John T. McGuire: Writing - Reviewing and Editing; Lisa Warfield: Data Curation, Writing - 

Original Draft, Writing - Reviewing and Editing; Katrice A. Lippa: Supervision. 

Acknowledgments

Committee on Laws and Regulations of the 108th Conference

Doug Rathbun, Illinois 

Michael Brooks, Arizona

Mauricio Mejia, Florida

Walter Remmert, Pennsylvania 

Tory Brewer, West Virginia 

Associate Membership Representative: Prentiss Searles, American Petroleum Institute

Canadian Technical Advisors: Rowan Hemsing, Measurement Canada 

NIST Technical Advisors: Lisa Warfield and John T. McGuire

NIST Technical Advisor on the Uniform Regulation for National Type Evaluation: Tina Butcher 

NCWM Committee Coordinator: Constantine Cotsoradis

Past Chairs of the Committee

Conference Chair Conference Chair

41 G. H. Leithauser, MD 78 F. Clem, OH

42-43 F. M. Greene, CT 79 B. Bloch, CA

44 G. L. Johnson, KY 80 S. Rhoades, AZ

45 R. Williams, NY 81 L. Straub, MD

46-49 J. H. Lewis, WA 82 S. Millay, ME

50-51 L. Barker, WV 83-84 K. Angell, WV

52 M. Jennings, TN 85 S. Morrison, CA

53 W. A. Kerlin, CA 86 R. Williams, TN

54-55 J. F. Lyles, VA 87 P. D’Errico, NJ

56-58 S. D. Andrews, FL 88-89 D. Johannes, CA

59 R. M. Leach, MI 90 J. Gomez, NM

60 R. L. Thompson, MD 91 J. Benavides, TX

61-62 C. H. Vincent, Dallas, TX 92 J. Cassidy, MA

63 J. T. Bennett, CT 93 Vicky Dempsey, OH

64 R. W. Probst, WI 94 Joe Gomez, NM

65 D. I. Offner, MO 95 Joe Benavides, TX

66-68 J. J. Bartfai, NY 96 John Gaccione, NY

69 W. R. Mossberg, CA 97-98 J. Cardin, WI

70 E. Skluzacek, MN 99 R. Johnson, NM

71 D. Stagg, AL 100 T. Lloyd, MT

72 A. Nelson, CT 101 R. Lewis, GA
NIST HB 130-2024 

November 2023

x 

73-74 K. Simila, OR 102-103 Ethan Bogren, NY

75 S. B. Colbrook, IL 104 Michelle Wilson, AZ

76 A. Nelson, CT 105 Ethan Bogren, NY

77 B. Bloch, CA 106-107 John McGuire, NJ

108 Doug Rathbun, IL
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

OUYEINC LTD.,

Plaintiff,

v.

Alucy and et al., 

Defendants.

Case No. 20 cv 3490

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL UNDER RULE 41(a)(1)

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Ouyeinc Ltd.

(“Ouyeinc” or “Plaintiff”) hereby dismisses this action with prejudice pursuant to settlement as 

to the following Defendants:

Defendant Name Line No.

bestbuystreets 132

hotyoyo 296

acwholesaler 108

DATED August 7, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ James A. Karamanis

James A. Karamanis

Barney & Karamanis, LLP

Two Prudential Plaza

180 N. Stetson, Ste 3050

Chicago, IL 60601

Tel.: 312/553-5300

Attorney No. 6203479

James@bkchicagolaw.com

Case: 1:20-cv-03490 Document #: 45 Filed: 08/07/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:232
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF Ouyeinc Ltd.

Case: 1:20-cv-03490 Document #: 45 Filed: 08/07/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:233
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

      ( print page 68446)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Renee Chapman, Contact Representative, or Theresa Kingsberry, Legal Assistant, Federal Trade Commission, Premerger Notification Office, Bureau of Competition,  Room CC-5301, Washington, DC 20024, (202) 326-3100.

By Direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2014-27025 Filed 11-14-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

The undersigned officer of WII Components, Inc. (the “Company”)hereby certifies that the Company’s annual report on Form 10-k for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2006 to which this certification is beingfurnished as an exhibit (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”)promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”),and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32),this certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes ofSection 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability ofthat section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by referenceinto any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to theextent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
| Date: March 28, 2007 |   |                                         |
|----------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                 |   | /s/ John Fitzpatrick                         |   |
|                 |   | Name: John Fitzpatrick                       |
|                 |   | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John S. Reiland, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of US Dataworks, Inc.;2.
    

    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. Date: November 15, 2004 /s/ John S. ReilandJohn S. Reiland,Chief Financial Officer
Hello,

It's good to see the NIST framework being updated again. I would like to propose that there be more 

specifics about data itself. For example in the first function "Identify", data is buried in Asset 

Management and only lightly touched in the Resources section. Data assets should be discovered and 

classified with sensitivity levels assigned to all the corporate data assets. ID.AM-5 does allude to 

classification, criticality and business value but nothing is said on how this is determined, and that starts 

with discovery.

Happy to participate on any committee.

Thanks

Alan
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 317 Agreed to House (ATH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 317

Providing for the agreement of the House to the Senate amendment to the 
                  bill, H.R. 2472, with an amendment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 9, 1997

Mr. Dan Schaefer of Colorado submitted the following resolution; which 
                      was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the agreement of the House to the Senate amendment to the 
                  bill, H.R. 2472, with an amendment.

    Resolved, That, upon the adoption of this resolution, the bill H.R. 
2472, to extend certain programs under the Energy Policy and 
Conservation Act, be, and the same is hereby, taken from the Speaker's 
table to the end that the Senate amendment to the text of the bill be, 
and the same is hereby, agreed to with an amendment as follows: In lieu 
of the matter proposed to be inserted by the Senate, insert the 
following:

SECTION 1. ENERGY POLICY AND CONSERVATION ACT AMENDMENTS.

    The Energy Policy and Conservation Act is amended--
            (1) in section 166 (42 U.S.C. 6246) by striking ``1997'' 
        and inserting in lieu thereof ``1998'';
            (2) in section 181 (42 U.S.C. 6251) by striking ``September 
        30, 1997'' both places it appears and inserting in lieu thereof 
        ``September 1, 1998''; and
            (3) in section 281 (42 U.S.C. 6285) by striking ``September 
        30, 1997'' both places it appears and inserting in lieu thereof 
        ``September 1, 1998''.
                                 <all>
```
CFTC Ex. 52

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 79-5 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:1477
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 79-5 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:1478
 

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 79-5 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:1479
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 79-5 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:1480
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than December 5, 2014.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Chapelle Davis, Assistant Vice President) 1000 Peachtree Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:

                    1.                     *ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.,*                     Birmingham, Alabama; to merge with Metro Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire Metro Bank, both in Douglasville, Georgia.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 6, 2014.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2014-26720 Filed 11-10-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF ICG FUNDING, LLC FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                               20,835
<SECURITIES>                           0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                          0<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                           0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                            0<F1> 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      9,542
<PP&E>                                 0<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                         0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      135,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 1,116
<BONDS>                               4,699
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               127,847
<PREFERRED>                            0<F1>
<COMMON>                               0<F1> 
<OTHER-SE>                            2,108
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        135,770
<SALES>                                0<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       0<F1>
<CGS>                                  0<F1>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          0<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   (3,890)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       3,890
<INCOME-TAX>                           0<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   3,890
<DISCONTINUED>                         0<F1>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0<F1>
<CHANGES>                              0<F1>
<NET-INCOME>                          3,890
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>THIS VALUE IS NOT APPLICABLE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
H. Res. 320

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 10 (legislative day, November 9), 1997.

Resolved, That a committee of two Members of the

House be appointed to wait upon the President of the United

States and inform him that the House of Representatives has

completed its business of the session and is ready to adjourn,

unless the President has some other communication to make

to them.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Sol. S. Sizemore *v.*H. S. Thomas.

Appeals and Errors — Failure to Supersede Judgment — Involuntary Payment — Recovery at Reversal.

The appellant was not bound to supersede tbe judgment, and tbe payment thereof cannot be regarded as voluntary on his part because an execution had already issued from the quarterly court and his property had been actually seized before the dissolution of his injunction.

APPEAL PROM HENDERSON COURT OP COMMON PLEAS.

October 10, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The payment of the Quarterly Court judgment can not be regarded as voluntary on the part of appellee. There was a judgment against him, upon which both the Quarterly and Circuit Courts had held an execution might lawfully issue.

He was not bound, and possibly may not have been able to supersede the judgment of the Circuit Court dissolving his injunction and dismissing his petition. It was not necessary that he should, for the reason that an execution had already been issued and his property actually seized. It being apparent that appellant intended to resort to all his legal remedies to enforce the collection of the Quarterly Court judgment. Appellee’s payment was made under constraint and by reason of appellant’s legal advantage at the time, and as the court in effect compelled him! to pay a debt he did not owe, they can not and ought not, now that they have corrected their error, refuse to assist him in recovering back the money that was improperly extorted from him by reason of such error. If such a rule was established, the right to appeal to this court would be utterly worth*704less to those who could not supersede the judgments of inferior tribunals.

*Sizemore, for appellant.*

*Vance, for appellee.*

The settlement between appellee and his brother does not affect his claim against appellants.

Judgment *affirmed.*
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 9, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50710 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RUBEN TORRES-ROBLES, also known as Luis Alberto Vidal, also known as Pedro C. Parra, also known as Juan Vasquez Ibarra, also known as Juan Ibarra, also known as Ruben Torres, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-466-ALL

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Ruben TorresRobles raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.