alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Family Entertainment Services, Inc. D/B/ A IMC ) 

) 

ASBCA No. 59161 

Under Contract No. W9124E-12-D-0001 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

Mr. William Johnson 

President 

Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

CPT Evan C. Williams, JA 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 1 July 2014 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59161, Appeal of Family 

Entertainment Services, Inc. D/B/A IMC, rendered in conformance with the Board's 

Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREYD. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
#### State of Indiana *v.*Adah W. Graham.

[No. 3-374A34.

Filed September 25, 1975.

Rehearing denied November 12, 1975.]

*159
      *Theodore L. Sendak,*Attorney General, *William E. Daily,*Deputy Attorney General for appellant.

*Raymond M. Fox, Jr., Sweeney, Fox, Sweeney, Winski and Dabagia,*of Michigan City, for appellee.

Hoffman, J.

Plaintiff-appellant State of Indiana initiated this condemnation action by filing a complaint to appropriate certain real estate owned by defendant-appellee Adah Graham.

After trial to a jury, a judgment was entered in favor of Graham for $21,000, plus interest. Later she filed a motion to correct errors, which was granted and a new trial ordered. The State then perfected this appeal.

At trial, appellant State’s expert witness estimated Graham’s damages at $10,571. Appellee Graham’s witnesses estimated her damages at $109,756 and $89,409.

The trial court’s grant of a new trial set aside the jury’s verdict for $21,000 on the ground that it was against the clear weight of the evidence. Appellant contends that such action was erroneous.

The issue presented in the case at bar has been decided adversely to the State upon a similar factual situation in *State*v. *Bowling*(1970), 253 Ind. 634, 256 N.E.2d 392.

*160
      *159The State also raises the issue that the ruling of the trial court does not comply with Ind. Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule *160■59(E). The findings filed by the trial court pursuant to an order of this court, combined with the original findings, meet the bare minimum requirements of Trial Rule 59(E), *supra.*

No reversible error having been shown, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Staton, P.J. and Garrard, J., concur.

Note — Reported at 333 N.E.2d 924.
Agenda 

Date: October 31, 2014

Topic: 2015 Update

ANSI/NIST-ITL Standard

9:30 Welcome and Orientation: 

Barbara Guttman

 Director, Information Access Division, NIST

 

 

 

 Shahram Orandi

 Group Leader, Image Group, NIST

9:45: Project Overview

 Brad Wing, NIST

10:00 Two Suggested Minor Revisions 

 John Mayer-Splain, Noblis

10:15 Break

10:30 NIEM 3.0 and its impact on ANSI/NIST-ITL

 Kamran Atri, CSE Corporation

11:00 Schema Testing and cross-correlation with automated tables

 Rachel Wallner, Noblis

11:15 Conformance Testing / Some Suggested Revisions to the Standard

 Dylan Yaga, NIST

11:30 Annex G Automated Generation

 Manoj Bisht, CSE Corporation

11:45 Facial Issue

 Wearing Glasses

Delia McGarry, Noblis

12:00 Friction Ridge Issues

 FAP 55

Tom Buss, Integrated Biometrics

12:15 LUNCH

12:45 Multispectral, optical capture at a distance 

 Mike Garris, NIST
1:00 NFIQ2

 Brad Wing for Elham Tabassi, NIST

1:15 Dental Encoding Translator (Type-12 Based)

 Bruce Bandini, NIST

Group Discussion

1:30 Moderated by Brad Wing

 Objectives: 

 Agree Upon General Format of the Document

 Develop an Initial Timeframe

 Define Working Groups

 Select Working Group Leads

 

2:00 Adjourn

Travel HOME for Halloween festivities
9502.

#### Bentley, relator, *v.*Irvin.

Decided November 8, 1918.

Motion to disbar attorney; from Wilkes superior court—Judge Walker. ,

P. *B. D’Orr, L. S.*Hulbert, for plaintiff.

*W. D.*Thomson, for defendant.

Luke, J.

The hill of exceptions in this case has never been served, nor has service been waived; and' therefore the writ of error is

*Dismissed.*

*Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.*
EXHIBIT 11


                             NB CAPITAL CORPORATION
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



                                        Three-month period    Three-month period
                                               ended                 ended 
                                             March 31,             March 31, 
                                               1999                   1998
                                        ------------------    ------------------



Net income                                  $ 9,091,293           $ 9,444,371



Deduct:   Senior preferred stock                                              
          and series A preferred                                              
          stock dividends                     6,269,620             6,273,721
                                              ---------             ---------


                                 (A)       $  2,821,673          $  3,170,650

Common share outstanding         (B)                100                   100


Earning per share                (A/B)     $  28,216.73         $   31,706.50












                                     - 13 -
IV

House Calendar No. 267

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 575

[Report No. 105–778]

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to consideration

of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 5, 1998

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect

to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the

Committee on Rules, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 4(b) of rule

2 XI for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported from that committee before the legislative day of

6 October 11, 1998, providing for consideration or disposi7 tion of any of the following:
2

HRES 575 RH

1 (1) A bill or joint resolution making general ap2 propriations for the fiscal year ending September 30,

3 1999, any amendment thereto, any conference report

4 thereon, or any amendment reported in disagree5 ment from a conference thereon.

6 (2) A bill or joint resolution that includes provi7 sions making continuing appropriations for fiscal

8 year 1999, any amendment thereto, any conference

9 report thereon, or any amendment reported in dis10 agreement from a conference thereon.

11 SEC. 2. It shall be in order at any time before October

12 11, 1998, for the Speaker to entertain motions to suspend

13 the rules, provided that the object of any such motion is

14 announced from the floor at least two hours before the

15 motion is offered. In scheduling the consideration of legis16 lation under this authority, the Speaker or his designee

17 shall consult with the Minority Leader or his designee.

House Calendar No. 267

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 575

[Report No. 105–778]

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI

for other purposes.tions reported from the Committee on Rules, andwith respect to consideration of certain resoluOCTOBER 5, 1998

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 4.2

                NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED BY TRANSFER AGENT
                  INCORPORATED UNDER BUSINESS CORPORATIONS ACT

                                   (ALBERTA)


NUMBER                                                               SHARES
                          EMISSION DIFFERENTIALS LTD.

                         AUTHORIZED WARRANTS: UNLIMITED
                                  NO PAR VALUE


THIS CERTIFIES THAT


Is The Record Holder Of


                      EMISSION DIFFERENTIALS LTD. Warrants

transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof, in person or
by duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate properly
endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer
Agent and registered by the Registrar.

         Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile
signatures of its duly authorized officers.


Dated:

                           EMISSION DIFFERENTIALS LTD
                                 CORPORATE SEAL

/s/ signature                                       /s/ signature
----------------------------                        ----------------------------
                   SECRETARY                                           PRESIDENT


INTERWEST TRANSFER CO., INC. P.O. Box 17136/ Salt Lake City, Utah 84117

COUNTERSIGNED & REGISTERED

--------------------------------------------------
COUNTERSIGNED, Transfer Agent-Authorized Signature
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3895 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3895

 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to permit local public 
            agencies to act as Medicaid enrollment brokers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 2004

   Mr. Issa (for himself, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Terry, Mr. 
  Bereuter, Mr. Filner, and Mrs. Davis of California) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to permit local public 
            agencies to act as Medicaid enrollment brokers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMITTING LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCIES TO ACT AS MEDICAID 
              ENROLLMENT BROKERS.

     Section 1903(b)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1396b(b)(4)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
            ``(C)(i) Subparagraphs (A) and (B) shall not apply in the 
        case of a local public agency that is acting as an enrollment 
        broker under a contract or memorandum with a State medicaid 
        agency, provided the local public agency does not have a direct 
        or indirect financial interest with any medicaid managed care 
        plan for which it provides enrollment broker services.
            ``(ii) In determining whether a local public agency has a 
        direct or indirect financial interest with a medicaid managed 
        care plan under clause (i), the status of a local public agency 
        as a contractor of the plan does not constitute having a direct 
        or indirect financial interest with the plan.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### R. S. Steinberger *v.*B. F. Taylor, etc.

Judges — Special Judge of Police Court — No Statutes Authorizing Appointment or Selection — Findings and Judgments Void — No Appeal Lies to County Court.

There is no statute authorizing the appointment of a special' judge of a police court. The selection by the parties does not invest him with judicial functions. His finding and judgments are nothing more than an award and cannot be enforced as a judgment. No appeal lies to the county court.

*107Judges — Special Judge of Police Court — Appointment of Commissioner— Compensation of Commissioner is a Part of Amount in Controversy.

The special judge having no jurisdiction, his order appointing a commissioner was void and he was not entitled to compensation. The allowance of one hundred dollars to the commissioner does not come within the general term of cost; hence it must he considered in determining the amount in controversy on appeal.

January 5, 1872.

APPEAL PROM MERCER CIRCUIT COURT.

J. *B. Thompson, for appellant.*

*Kyle & Keller, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

We are not aware of any statute authorizing the appointment or selection of a special judge to hold the court or to try any cause pending in the court of the police judge of the town of Harrodsburg. The selection of E. T. Folk, esquire, by the parties could1 not invest him with judicial functions. His finding and judgment, though entered upon the record1 books of said police judge, were nothing more than an award, and could not be enforced as a judgment. Hence no appeal would lie therefrom to the circuit court of Mercer county, and as the amount involved in the litigation was less than fifty dollars, that court -had no original jurisdiction of the subject-matter.

The action of such court was therefore not merely irregular, but wholly unauthorized. Having no jurisdiction the order was void. The commissioner, having no legal right to act under such order, was entitled to no compensation for his services from appellants who objected to the reference and also to the commissioner.

The judgment in favor of appellee is void, as is also the order making the allowance of one hundred dollars to the commissioner. This allowance does not come within the general term of costs, but was a special and illegal allowance. Hen'ce it must be considered in determining the amount in controversy in this appeal. The cause is remanded with instructions to the circuit court to set aside the judgment and order complained of and to dismiss the proceeding.
By Samuel Blackman

Under, Joseph Curtis &

Emre Brookes

The Addition of 

Functionality to the 

Jmol/JSmol Application
 Jmol/Jsmol is a molecular structure visualization tool

 Jmol – In Java, Standalone

 Jsmol – In JavaScript, Web application

What’s Jmol/Jsmol?
Jmol JSmol
 SASSIE Web is a program that uses atomistic models to predict and 

interpret scattering data (i.e. Neutrons, X-Rays)

 It’s my goal to add functionalities to Jmol/Jsmol for SASSIE Web.

SASSIE WEB
 GenApp – program that converts standalone applications 

to other formats:

 Web Application

 Qt 3, 4, and pending 5

 Android and soon iOS

 I have to make sure that Jmol is compatible with both 

SASSIE and GenApp

The Project as a Whole
GenApp
 Load in multiple molecules at once

 Move structures independently

 Saving the universe of a molecule(s)

 View all sorts of structures, from proteins to DNA. 

Possibilities with Jmol/JSmol
 Permanent/Fixed Command Console

 Persistent right click menu

 Second customized menu

 An Atom List

Addition of Jmol/JSmol Functionality
Permanent/Fixed Console
Persistent Right Click Menu 
 Work still in progress

 Will contain series of commands/options to help more 

easily manipulate structures

 Center

 Translate

 Rotate

 Align

 Calculating Scattering

 Calculating Properties

 Dropping in Geometric Objects

Second Customized Menu
 Can select specific atoms for manipulation

Atom List

 GenApp will eventually begin testing with other 

applications other than SASSIE.

 Jmol/JSmol will eventually have all the functionalities and 

look and feel in full. Jmol/JSmol will also be fully 

implemented in SASSIE Web and it’s compatibility with 

GenApp will be ensured.

Moving Forward
 The GenApp framework integrated with Airavata for managed 

compute resource submissions by Emre Bookes et al. 

http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2690890

 Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 

3D. http://www.jmol.org/

 SASSIE Program:

http://www.smallangles.net/sassie/SASSIE/SASSIE_HOME.html

 Dr. Joseph Curtis

 Dr. Emre Brookes

 Dr. Robert Hanson

References
 Dr. Joseph Curtis

 Dr. Emre Brookes

 Dr. Robert Hanson

 Mr. Steve Howell

 Dr. Julie Borchers & Dr. Yamali Hernandez 

 SHIP Director and SHIP Program

 NIST Center for Neutron Research

 Center for High Resolution Neutron Scattering

Acknowledgments
Exhibit 32.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of CompX  International  Inc.  (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Darryl R.
Halbert, Vice President,  Chief Financial Officer and Controller of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.






/s/Darryl R. Halbert
------------------------------------------
Darryl R. Halbert
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
 and Controller
October 26, 2004





Note: The certification  the registrant  furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed
"filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  as
amended,  or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  Registration
Statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference,  except as otherwise  expressly
stated in such filing.
#### Alan Douglas RAMSAY, Plaintiff— Appellant, v. The HOME DEPOT, INCORPORATED, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 04-1816.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 30, 2004.

Decided Dec. 22, 2004.

David M. Kopstein, Dross, Levenstein, Perilman & Kopstein, Seabrook, Maryland, for Appellant. Matthew T. Angotti, Edwin L. Keating, Anderson, Coe & King, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Alan Douglas Ramsay appeals the district court’s orders granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders for the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum opinion. *See Ramsay v. Home Depot, Inc.,*No. CA-03-1504-AMD (D. Md. May 27, 2004; June 5, 2004)(paperless order denying reconsideration). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Antonio Solis, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02348

Honorable Martha M. Pacold

HRP Exchange 55 LLC, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, February 15, 2022:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Status hearing set for

2/16/2022 is stricken and reset to 4/13/2022 at 9:15 a.m. by telephone. By 4/7/2022 the

parties shall file a joint status report with an update on discovery and settlement

discussions. The Court has reviewed the latest Joint Status Report [160] which indicates

that the parties are progressing with production of electronic discovery. Mailed notice(lxs,

)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02348 Document #: 162 Filed: 02/15/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1017
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Edward K. Aldag, Jr., certify that:

| 1) | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Medical Properties Trust, Inc. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3) | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: August 6, 2019 |   |   |   |   |   | /s/ Edward K. Aldag, Jr.                        |
|----------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   |   |   |   |   | Edward K. Aldag, Jr.                            |
|                 |   |   |   |   |   | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |