alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.2

                CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
              PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a), AS AMENDED

I, Kate Blankenship, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of CalPetro Tankers (Bahamas
I) Limited;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the company and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal controls over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
company's internal controls over financial reporting; and

5. The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: June 26, 2007

/s/ Kate Blankenship
--------------------
    Kate Blankenship
    Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.2



                          CITIBANK OMNI-S MASTER TRUST
            (formerly known as Sears Credit Account Master Trust II)

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Citibank (South Dakota),
National Association ("CBSD") as Servicer pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement dated as of July 31, 1994, as amended, by and among CBSD (as successor
to Sears, Roebuck and Co.), as Servicer, Citi Omni-S Finance LLC (as successor
to SRFG, Inc.), as Seller, and The Bank of New York (successor trustee to Bank
One, National Association (formerly, The First National Bank of Chicago)), as
Trustee, hereby certifies that:

      1.   CBSD is the Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

      2.   The undersigned is duly authorized pursuant to the Pooling and
           Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the
           Trustee.

      3.   During the calendar year ended December 31, 2003 in the course of my
           duties as a Servicing Officer of the Servicer, I would normally
           obtain knowledge of any Servicer Termination Event.

      4.   To the best of my knowledge, no Servicer Termination Event has
           occurred.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate as of the
15th day of March, 2004.
                                             By:  /s/ Andrew J. Lubliner
                                                  ----------------------
                                                      Andrew J. Lubliner
                                                      Servicing Officer
Handbook 44 - 2007 4.46. Berry Baskets and Boxes 

Section 4.46. Berry Baskets and Boxes 

A. Application 

A.1. - This code applies to baskets and boxes for berries and small fruits in capacities of 1 dry quart and less. 

A.2. - See also Sec. 1.10; General Code requirements. 

S. Specifications 

S.1. Units. - The capacity of a berry basket or box shall be 1⁄2 dry pint, 1 dry pint, or 1 dry quart. 

S.2. Materials. - A berry basket or box shall be made of any suitable materials that will retain its shape during normal 

filling, storage, and handling. 

S.3. Capacity Point. - The capacity of a berry basket or box shall be determined by its top edges. 

N. Notes 

N.1. Method of Test. - A berry basket or box may be tested either volumetrically, using rape seed as the testing medium, 

or geometrically through accurate inside dimension measurement and calculation. 

T. Tolerances 

T.1. Tolerances on Individual Measures. - Maintenance and acceptance tolerances in excess and deficiency on an 

individual measure shall be as shown in Table 1. 

T.2. Tolerances on Average Capacity. - The average capacity on a random sample of 10 measures selected from a lot 

of 25 or more shall be equal to or greater than the nominal capacity. 

(Amended 1979) 

Table 1. 

Maintenance and Acceptance Tolerances 

in Excess and in Deficiency

Tolerance 

Nominal Capacity In Excess 

cubic inches 

In Deficiency 

cubic inches 

1⁄2 pint 1 0.5 

1 pint 2 1.0 

1 quart 3 1.5 

4-23 
4.46. Berry Baskets and Boxes Handbook 44 - 2007 

THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK. 

4-24
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Management and Budget

# AGENCY:

Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        By virtue of the authority vested in the President by section 2(a) of Public Law 87-603 (76 Stat. 593; 42 U.S.C. 2652), and delegated to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) by the President through Executive Order No. 11541 of July 1, 1970, the rates referenced below are hereby established. These rates are for use in connection with the recovery from tortiously liable third persons for the cost of outpatient medical, dental, and cosmetic surgery services furnished by military treatment facilities through the Department of Defense (DoD). The rates were established in accordance with the requirements of OMB Circular A-25, requiring reimbursement of the full cost of all services provided.                         *The CY14 Outpatient Medical, Dental, and Cosmetic Surgery rates*                         referenced are effective upon publication of this notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         and will remain in effect until further notice. Previously published inpatient rates remain in effect until further notice. Pharmacy rates are updated periodically. A full disclosure of the rates is posted at the DoD's Uniform Business Office Web site:                         *http://www.tricare.mil/​ocfo/​mcfs/​ubo/​mhs_​rates.cfm.*

Shaun Donovan,

Director.

[FR Doc. 2014-27208 Filed 11-17-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3110-01-P
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 362

Commending the visit of His Holiness Pope John Paul II to Cuba.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 12, 1998

Mr. GALLEGLY (for himself, Mr. HAMILTON, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. HOUGHTON, Mr. BALLENGER, and Mr. CAMPBELL) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Commending the visit of His Holiness Pope John Paul II

to Cuba.

Whereas Pope John Paul II recently completed a five-day

first ever Papal visit to Cuba to speak directly to the

Cuban people;

Whereas the Pope led the Cuban people in celebration

throughout the island, including leading the largest openair mass since 1959 on the last day of his visit in the

Plaza of the Revolution in Havana;

Whereas the Pope spoke directly with the Cuban people and

the Cuban Government about the importance of fundamental human rights and the necessity for ‘‘each person enjoying freedom of expression, being free to undertake initiatives and make proposals within civil society,

and enjoying appropriate freedom of association’’;
2

•HRES 362 IH

Whereas the Pope called for political freedom in Cuba, including a call to release ‘‘those who are isolated, persecuted, imprisoned for various offenses or for reasons of

conscience, for ideas which though dissident are nonetheless peaceful’’;

Whereas the Pope called for greater religious freedom in

Cuba and a ‘‘harmonious social climate and a suitable

legislation that enables every person and every religious

confession to live their faith freely, to express that faith

in the context of public life, and to count on adequate resources and opportunities to bring its spiritual, moral,

and civil benefits to bear on the life of the nation’’;

Whereas Cuban churches of all faiths supported the Papal

visit and emerged from the visit with expectations of

greater prominence and freedom to operate in Cuban society;

Whereas the Pope called for greater integration of the people

of Cuba into the international community by saying, ‘‘imposed isolation strikes the people indiscriminately, making it ever more difficult for the weakest to enjoy the

bare essentials of decent living’’; and

Whereas the Pope challenged Cuba and the international

community of nations by saying, ‘‘May Cuba with all its

magnificent potential, open itself up to the world, and

may the world open itself up to Cuba’’: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) commends Pope John Paul II for his visit

3 to Cuba, for his frank criticism of the Cuban Gov-
3

•HRES 362 IH

1 ernment, and his message of hope to the Cuban peo2 ple; and

3 (2) urges the President to build upon the visit

4 of Pope John Paul II and to support the Pope’s

5 message to the Cuban people.

Æ
Exhibit
13.2


PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with this Annual Report of Ship Finance International Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Ole B. Hjertaker, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.





Date:
March 31, 2010








/s/
      Ole B. Hjertaker


Ole B.
Hjertaker


Chief
Executive Officer & Interim Chief Financial Officer
#### Wade W. SLAUGHTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mr. QUINTANA; Mr. Rulet; Mr. Sanchez; Lt. Mestipust; Warden Gunja; and North Central Regional Office of Federal Bureau of Prisons, and executives or employees involved or parties at the U.S. Penitentiary Florence, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-1372.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Dec. 27, 2004.

John W. Suthers, U.S. Attorney, Denver, CO, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before KELLY, HENRY, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.*

*

 After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to decide this case on the briefs without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G).

ORDER AND JUDGMENT**

HENRY, Circuit Judge.

Wade W. Slaughter, a federal prisoner in the custody of the United States Department of Prisons, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action without prejudice. The district court’s dismissal was based on Mr. Slaughter’s failure to submit a certified trust statement for the entire six-month period preceding the filing of his complaint and his failure to name the same defendants in the caption and the body of the complaint and in the caption and affidavit for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

In an April 14, 2004 order, the magistrate judge notified Mr. Slaughter of these deficiencies and allowed him thirty days to cure them. Mr. Slaughter failed to do so, and, on May 28, 2004, the district court dismissed his complaint without prejudice to the refiling of a corrected complaint, motion, and affidavit.

In his appellate brief, Mr. Slaughter fails to explain his failure to file a corrected complaint in response to the court’s order. We therefore conclude that the district court’s dismissal was proper.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the district court’s dismissal of Mr. Slaughter’s com*717plaint without prejudice.1

**

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

1

. We grant Mr. Slaughter’s motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. We remind Mr. Slaughter of his obligation to continue making partial payments until the entire fee is paid.
#### John F. Whitfield *v.*John W. Bone.

New Trial — Diligence.

The statements In the affidavits of those who were in and about the mill, if true, might have produced a different result, but there is no sufficient reason given why these persons were not examined as witnesses on the trial of the case.

APPEAL PROM HOPKINS CIRCUIT COURT.

September 28, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor :

Under the contract between the appellant and the appellee .by which the former agreed to saw and delived to the appellee at the appellant’s mill eight thousand feet of lumber, the appellee was not vested with any rights or title to it, until it was measured and set apart for him, as recited in the instruction given * * * by the court below. The stacking of the lumber or measuring a portion of it did not constitute a delivery until actually received by the defendant. The facts proven on the trial authorized the finding by the jury. Upon the application for a new trial the affidavits of those who sawed the lumber or who were in or about the mill the whole time the sawing was going on, are filed, and their statements, if true, might have produced a different result, but there is no sufficient reason given why these persons were not examined as witnesses. It is true the affidavits stated that the affiants had repeated conversations with the appellant and failed to disclose to him what they knew about the case, still the appellant knew they were about the mill all the time, some of them engaged in running it, and they were the very witnesses he should have examined upon the trial — the witness who lived in a distant county or town should have given *701his deposition, or the appellant made some effort to continue the case on account of his absence. The motion for a new trial was properly overruled, and the judgment of the court below is *affirmed.*

*Bemchamp, for appellant.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR 

THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNICORN GLOBAL, INC., AND 

HANGZHOU CHIC INTELLIGENT 

TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. 

Plaintiffs,

v.

E-LINK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., 

STKE, E_POWER, US WEIXUN, 

NANCYS SHOP, SMALIFE, 

WORMWHOLE USA, VENUSBOARD, 

HYPER GOGO BOARD, GRAVITYEX, 

EBUYSTORMSHOP, ICHEERS_HOT, 

STKE_668, STK_068, SINCEVERS, 

PICTURSTORE, LEVESLAND, 

HAPPYDSTORE9, KOOZONEMALL, 

FINDMEY, ASIWO2018, 

FRAYSEEASHOP, ASIWOE2, 

URICHDEALSTORE, FUNGISTORE, 

STKE_211,

ONENICEMALLSTORE, 

BETERYOURLIFE, AND TWO DOTS

 Defendants.

) Case No. 1:20-cv-04127

)

) Judge Elaine E. Bucklo

)

)

)

) Magistrate Judge Jeffery T. Gilbert

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR 

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE [ECF #84]

Defendants E-Link Technology Co., Two Dots, and Hyper GoGo Board (“the Responding 

Defendants”), and Plaintiffs Unicorn Global, Inc. and Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., 

Ltd. (collectively “the Parties”) have conferred regarding Plaintiffs’ Motion to Show Cause (ECF 

#84), and jointly request that the Court enter the stipulated briefing schedule set forth below. This 

proposed schedule will allow counsel for the Responding Defendants sufficient time to gather and 

analyze the relevant facts and law and respond to the pending Motion, and counsel for Plaintiffs 

sufficient time to respond to the defense filing:

Case: 1:20-cv-04127 Document #: 92 Filed: 04/20/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:3224
2 

(1) the Responding Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Show Cause 

(ECF #84) is due three weeks from the scheduled presentment date of April 21, 

2021 (i.e., on May 12, 2021); and 

(2) Plaintiff’s Reply is due two weeks after the opposition brief is filed. 

Dated: April 20, 2021 Respectfully submitted, 

 ____________________ 

Shen Wang

Peter J. Curtin (pro hac vice) 

Diego F. Freire 

ARCH & LAKE LLP 

203 N LaSalle Street, Suite 2100 

Chicago, IL 60601 

Phone: (636) 236-5390 

Email: shenwang@archlakelaw.com

 pete_curtin@archlakelaw.com

 diego@archlakelaw.com 

Counsel for Defendants E-Link Technology, 

Co., Ltd., Two Dots, & Hyper GoGo Board 

SO ORDERED.

____________________ 

United States District Judge

Case: 1:20-cv-04127 Document #: 92 Filed: 04/20/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:3225
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on April 20, 2021, a true and correct copy of the foregoing [Proposed} 

Stipulated Briefing Schedule for Plaintiffs’ Motion to Show Cause [ECF #84] was served via the 

Court’s ECF system on all counsel of record. 

_________________ 

Peter J. Curtin

ARCH & LAKE LLP 

203 N LaSalle Street, Suite 2100 

Chicago, IL 60601 

Phone: (240) 432-3267 

Email: pete_curtin@archlakelaw.com

Case: 1:20-cv-04127 Document #: 92 Filed: 04/20/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:3226
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 464 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 464

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to provide a vote in 
   the Committee of the Whole to the Delegate to the House from the 
                         District of Columbia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 1998

 Ms. Norton submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to provide a vote in 
   the Committee of the Whole to the Delegate to the House from the 
                         District of Columbia.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. VOTE IN COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FOR DELEGATE FROM THE 
              DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

    (a) Powers of Delegate.--Rule XII of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended--
            (1) by striking ``The Resident Commissioner'' and inserting 
        ``1. The Resident Commissioner''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new clause:
    ``2. In a Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union, 
the Delegate to the House from the District of Columbia shall possess 
the same powers and privileges as Members of the House.''.
    (b) Committees of the Whole House.--Clause 2 of rule XXIII of the 
Rules of the House of Representatives is amended by adding at the end 
the following new paragraph:
    ``(d) Whenever a recorded vote on any question has been decided by 
a margin within which the vote cast by the Delegate to the House from 
the District of Columbia has been decisive, the Committee of the Whole 
House on the state of the Union shall automatically rise and the 
Speaker shall put that question de novo without intervening debate or 
other business. Upon the announcement of the vote on that question, the 
Committee of the Whole shall resume its sitting without 
intervention.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 1 shall take effect immediately 
before noon on January 3, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.2

AMERICAN PATRIOT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
CERTIFICATION

I,
T. Don Waddell, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of American Patriot Financial Group, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: April 15, 2009

Signature:

/s/ T. DON WADDELLT. Don Waddell Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks