66404 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 216 / Friday, November 7, 2014 / Notices 

1A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any 

individual Commissioner’s statements will be 

available from the Office of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s Web site. 

2The Commission has found the response 

submitted by Agri-Fab, Inc. to be individually 

adequate. Comments from other interested parties 

will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)). 

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

2The Commission additionally determined that it 

would not have found material injury by reason of 

subject imports of chlorinated isocyanurates from 

China but for the suspension of liquidation of 

entries on the subject imports. 

3 Vice Chairman Dean A. Pinkert determines that 

an industry in the United States is materially 

injured by reason of imports from China and Japan 

of chlorinated isocyanurates. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Thirkill (202–1025), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (http://

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this review may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—On Monday, October 6, 

2014, the Commission determined that 

the domestic interested party group 

response to its notice of institution (79 

FR 37349, July 1, 2014) of the subject 

five-year review was adequate and that 

the respondent interested party group 

response was inadequate. The 

Commission did not find any other 

circumstances that would warrant 

conducting a full review.1 Accordingly, 

the Commission determined that it 

would conduct an expedited review 

pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act. 

Staff report.—A staff report 

containing information concerning the 

subject matter of the review will be 

placed in the nonpublic record on 

Monday, November 17, 2014, and made 

available to persons on the 

Administrative Protective Order service 

list for this review. A public version 

will be issued thereafter, pursuant to 

section 207.62(d)(4) of the 

Commission’s rules. 

Written submissions.—As provided in 

section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s 

rules, interested parties that are parties 

to the review and that have provided 

individually adequate responses to the 

notice of institution,2 and any party 

other than an interested party to the 

review may file written comments with 

the Secretary on what determination the 

Commission should reach in the review. 

Comments are due on or before 

Thursday, November 20, 2014 and may 

not contain new factual information. 

Any person that is neither a party to the 

five-year review nor an interested party 

may submit a brief written statement 

(which shall not contain any new 

factual information) pertinent to the 

review by Thursday, November 20, 

2014. However, should the Department 

of Commerce extend the time limit for 

its completion of the final results of its 

review, the deadline for comments 

(which may not contain new factual 

information) on Commerce’s final 

results is three business days after the 

issuance of Commerce’s results. If 

comments contain business proprietary 

information (BPI), they must conform 

with the requirements of sections 201.6, 

207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s 

rules. Please be aware that the 

Commission’s rules with respect to 

filing have changed. The most recent 

amendments took effect on July 25, 

2014. See 79 FR 35920 (June 25, 2014), 

and the revised Commission Handbook 

on E-filing, available from the 

Commission’s Web site at http://

edis.usitc.gov. 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the rules, each document 

filed by a party to the review must be 

served on all other parties to the review 

(as identified by either the public or BPI 

service list), and a certificate of service 

must be timely filed. The Secretary will 

not accept a document for filing without 

a certificate of service. 

Determination.—The Commission has 

determined to exercise its authority to 

extend the review period by up to 90 

days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B) 

and 1675(c)(5)(C)(ii). 

Authority: This review is being conducted 

under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act 

of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to 

section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: November 4, 2014. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26508 Filed 11–6–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–501 and 731– 

TA–1226 (Final)] 

Chlorinated Isocyanurates From China 

and Japan 

Determinations 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject investigations, the United 

States International Trade Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant 

to section 705(b) of the Tariff Act of 

1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)) (‘‘the Act’’), 

that an industry in the United States is 

threatened with material injury by 

reason of imports of chlorinated 

isocyanurates from China, provided for 

in subheadings 2933.69.6015, 

2933.69.6021, 2933.69.6050, 

3808.50.4000, 3808.94.5000, and 

3808.99.9500 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States, that have 

been found by the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) to be 

subsidized by the government of China.2

The Commission further determines, 

pursuant to section 735(b) of the Act (19 

U.S.C. 1673d(b)), that an industry in the 

United States is not materially injured 

or threatened with material injury, and 

the establishment of an industry in the 

United States is not materially retarded, 

by reason of imports of chlorinated 

isocyanurates from Japan that have been 

found by Commerce to be sold in the 

United States at less than fair value 

(‘‘LTFV’’).3

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

investigations effective August 29, 2013, 

following receipt of a petition filed with 

the Commission and Commerce by 

Clearon Corp., South Charleston, WV; 

and Occidental Chemical Corp., Dallas, 

TX. The final phase of the investigations 

was scheduled by the Commission 

following notification of preliminary 

determinations by Commerce that 

imports of chlorinated isocyanurates 

from China were subsidized within the 

meaning of section 703(b) of the Act (19 

U.S.C. 1671b(b)) and that imports of 

chlorinated isocyanurates from Japan 

were dumped within the meaning of 

733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673b(b)). 

Notice of the scheduling of the final 

phase of the Commission’s 

investigations and of a public hearing to 

be held in connection therewith was 

given by posting copies of the notice in 

the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

Washington, DC, and by publishing the 

notice in the Federal Register on May 

19, 2014 (79 FR 28771). The hearing was 

held in Washington, DC, on September 

9, 2014, and all persons who requested 

the opportunity were permitted to 

appear in person or by counsel. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 216 / Friday, November 7, 2014 / Notices 66405 

The Commission completed and filed 

its determinations in these 

investigations on November 3, 2014. 

The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 4494 

(November 2014), entitled Chlorinated 

Isocyanurates from China and Japan 

(Investigation Nos. 701–TA–501 and 

731–TA–1226 (Final)). 

By order of the Commission. 

Dated: November 3, 2014. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26472 Filed 11–6–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1103–0102] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed eCollection 

eComments Requested; Extension 

With Change, of a Previously 

Approved Collection COPS Office 

Progress Report 

AGENCY: Community Oriented Policing 

Services (COPS) Office, Department of 

Justice 

ACTION: 60-day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice 

(DOJ), Community Oriented Policing 

Services (COPS) Office, will be 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted for 60 days until 

January 6, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have additional comments 

especially on the estimated public 

burden or associated response time, 

suggestions, or need a copy of the 

proposed information collection 

instrument with instructions or 

additional information, please contact 

Kimberly J. Brummett, Program 

Specialist, Community Oriented 

Policing Services (COPS) Office, 145 N 

Street NE., Washington, DC 20530 

(phone: 202–353–9769). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written 

comments and suggestions from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed collection of information 

are encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the Bureau of Justice 

Statistics, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Evaluate whether and if so how the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected can be 

enhanced; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of this information 

collection: 

1. Type of Information Collection: 

Extension of a currently approved 

collection. 

2. The Title of the Form/Collection: 

COPS Office Progress Report. 

3. The agency form number, if any, 

and the applicable component of the 

Department sponsoring the collection: 

N/A. The applicable component within 

the Department of Justice is the 

Community Oriented Policing Services 

(COPS) Office. 

4. Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: Under the Violent Crime and 

Control Act of 1994, the U.S. 

Department of Justice COPS Office 

would require the completion of the 

COPS Progress Report by recipients of 

COPS hiring and non-hiring grants. 

Grant recipients must complete this 

report in order to inform COPS of their 

activities with their awarded grant 

funding. 

5. An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: An estimated 1,200 grantees 

will be required to submit an active 

progress report each quarter. The 

estimated range of burden for 

respondents is expected to be between 

20 minutes to 25 minutes for each 

quarterly completion. 

6. An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: The estimated public burden 

associated with this collection is 2000 

hours. It is estimated that respondents 

will take up to 25 minutes each quarter 

to complete the quarterly progress 

report. The burden hours for collecting 

respondent data sum to 2000 hours 

(1200 respondents × .4167 hours × 4 

times annually = 2000 hours). 

If additional information is required 

contact: Jerri Murray, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Two Constitution 

Square, 145 N Street NE., 3E.405B, 

Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: November 4, 2014. 

Jerri Murray, 

Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26503 Filed 11–6–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–AT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed 

Consent Decree Under the Clean Air 

Act 

Notice is hereby given that, for a 

period of 30 days, the United States will 

receive public comments on a proposed 

Consent Decree in United States et al. v. 

Hyundai Motor Company et al. (Civil 

Action No. 1:14–cv–1837), which was 

lodged with the United States District 

Court for the District of Columbia on 

November 3, 2014. The complaint was 

filed on the same day. 

In the complaint, the United States 

seeks civil penalties and injunctive 

relief pursuant to Sections 203, 204, and 

205 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 

7522, 7523, and 7524, against Hyundai 

Motor Company, Hyundai Motor 

America, Kia Motors Corporation, Kia 

Motors America, and Hyundai America 

Technical Center, Inc. (collectively, 

‘‘Defendants’’) for violations of the Act. 

The California Air Resources Board 

joins the United States as co-plaintiff 

and seeks civil penalties for related 

violations of California Health and 

Safety Code Section 43212. The 

violations arise from the Defendants’ 

introduction into commerce in the 

United States of over one million motor 

vehicles from model years 2012 and 

2013 that were not covered by 

Certificates of Conformity as required by 

the Act and regulations promulgated 

thereunder. The vehicles belong to six 

car lines: Hyundai’s Accent, Elantra, 

Veloster, and Santa Fe, and Kia’s Soul 

and Rio. Under the settlement, the 

Defendants will pay a civil penalty of 

$100 million, with $93,656,600 paid to 

the United States, and $6,343,400 paid 

to the California Air Resources Board. 

The Defendants will also reduce the 

number of greenhouse gas emission 

credits claimed in their Averaging, 

Banking, and Trading reports by a total 

of 4.75 million credits. The Defendants 

are also required to perform additional 

corrective measures, including auditing 

of their vehicles and improving testing 

and data management practices. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES