alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18

- 1 574 V

UNPUBLISHED

GEORGIE FLETCHER

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: March 2, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Guillain

- Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Matthew F. Belanger, Faraci Lange, LLP, Rochester, N Y , for petitioner.

Christine Mary Becer

, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On October 10, 2018

, Georgie Fletcher filed a petition for compensation under

the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. 2 (the

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she developed Guillain

- Barre Syndrome ( “ GBS ” )

as a res ult of a November 3, 2015 influenza ( “ flu ” ) vaccine . Petit ion at 1 . The case was

assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On March 2, 2020

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

at 1. Specifically, R espondent agrees that “ petitioner suffered GBS following a flu

vaccine within the Table time p eriod, and there is not a preponderanc e of the medical

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Managemen t and Promotion of

Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such

material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 19 86, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C.

§ 300aa (2012 ).2

evidence that petitioner ’ s GBS was due to a factor unrelated to the vaccinat ion. ” Id. at

4 . Respondent further agrees that the claim “ mee ts the statu tory severity requirements

because petitioner experienced sequelae of her GBS for mor e than six months . . . [and]

petitioner has sati sfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act

. ” Id . at 5.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
EXHIBIT 11

NB CAPITAL CORPORATION
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE(in thousand of US dollars, except per share amounts)

|                               | Three-month period
ended
September 30, 2004 | Three-month period
ended
September 30, 2003
|------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------
|                               |                                            
|Net income                     |                                             | $8,742                                     
|Deduct: Senior preferred stock |                                            
|and series A preferred         |                                            
|stock dividends                |                                             | 6,267                                      
|                               |                                            
|Common share outstanding       | (A)                                         | $2,475                                     
|                               | (B)                                         | 100                                        
|                               |                                            
|Earning per share              | (A/B)                                       | $     25                                   
|                              

---
ILND 450 (Rev. 04/29/2016) Judgment in a Civil Action

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Republic Technologies (NA), LLC, et al.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

D&S Tobacco N More Inc., et al.,

Defendant(s).

Case No. 20 C 431

Judge Martha M. Pacold 

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Judgment is hereby entered (check appropriate box):

in favor of plaintiff(s)

and against defendant(s)

in the amount of $ ,

which includes pre–judgment interest. 

does not include pre–judgment interest.

Post-judgment interest accrues on that amount at the rate provided by law from the date of this judgment. 

Plaintiff(s) shall recover costs from defendant(s).

in favor of defendant(s) 

and against plaintiff(s)

.

Defendant(s) shall recover costs from plaintiff(s).

other: judgment is entered in favor of plaintiffs Republic Technologies (NA), LLC and Sream, 

Inc. and against the defendants D&S Tobacco N More Inc. and Pankahj Dinesh Shah in the total amount of 

$30,400.

This action was (check one):

tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. 

tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision was reached. 

decided by Judge Martha M. Pacold on a motion for default judgment.

Date: 9/14/2020 Thomas G. Bruton, Clerk of Court

/s/ Ruth O'Shea, Deputy Clerk

Case: 1:20-cv-00431 Document #: 27 Filed: 09/14/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:204
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Florida Students to Speak with NASA Astronaut Aboard International Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"LQ9PIAQei4\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/florida-students-to-speak-with-nasa-astronaut-aboard-international-space-station\/\">Florida Students to Speak with NASA Astronaut Aboard International Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/florida-students-to-speak-with-nasa-astronaut-aboard-international-space-station\/embed\/#?secret=LQ9PIAQei4\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Florida Students to Speak with NASA Astronaut Aboard International Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"LQ9PIAQei4\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/m19-009.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Hill International,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Fanelli III, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By: /s/ John Fanelli III

John Fanelli III

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 30, 2009
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Adolfo VAZQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-50052.

D.C. No. CR-03-01312-TJW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 6, 2004.*

Decided Dec. 10, 2004.

*572U.S. Attorney, Richard Cheng, AUSA, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Benjamin P. Leehman, Esq., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GOODWIN, WALLACE and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Adolfo Vazquez appeals his jury trial conviction for importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960, and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Vazquez contends that the district court abused its discretion by admitting into evidence drug courier profile testimony as substantive evidence of his guilt. We disagree. The testimony in question was not introduced as substantive evidence of his guilt, but instead was admitted to provide the jury with information about how the investigation unfolded on the day of the seizure. *See United States v. Gomez-Norena,*908 F.2d 497, 501 (9th Cir.1990). Therefore, the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the testimony. *See id.*

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 	AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 	SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Quarterly report of Inland Fiber Group,	L.L.C. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities	and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John M. Rudey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant	to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

           1. The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

           2. The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

/s/ John M. RudeyJohn M. Rudey   Chief Executive Officer	November 14, 2004

**A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging,	or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required	by Section 906, has been provided to Inland Fiber Group, L.L.C. and will be retained by Inland Fiber Group, LLC and furnished to	the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**
#### Cyrus H. Fountain v. Mayor, etc., of Jackson.

[See Ante, p. 15.]

*Municipal Salaoies.*

Merely appropriating, for the payment of a municipal salary, a less amount than had been paid before is not to be construed as fixing ■ the salary at the smaller sum, if the body making the appropriation continues to allow salary bills at the former rate.

Motion for rehearing.

Submitted Apr. 4.

Denied Apr. 5.

City Attorney *Charles A. Blair*for the motion.

Gibson, *Parkinson & Ashley*against.

Per Curiam.

Motion is made for a rehearing on the ground that a statute of 1879, which took from the board of public works and conferred upon the common council the power to fix the plaintiffs salary, was overlooked or not noticed by the Court in the opinion.

But that statute was unimportant to this controversy unless the council acted upon it. The facts as found are that the plaintiff, when the statute took effect, was receiving a salary of $1200 a year under a previous appointment; that this continued to be paid until the spring of 1880, when the common council, in the annual appropriation bill, inserted for the plaintiff’s compensation $1000 only. The council did not at the time expressly declare that the salary should be $1000 only, but it is claimed by counsel for the city that this was the intent and significance of their vote. It may be that if that vote stood alone we must so construe it; but it does not. Throughout the year 1880, the plaintiff’s monthly bills at the rate of $100 per month were presented, *261certified by tbe board of public works, and allowed by the common council; and the inference seems very conclusive that the council did not understand they had acted under the Act of 1879 in reduction of the salary. If their action upon the annual appropriation bill could have that effect, their subsequent action, in allowing and paying the higher salary, would be equally effectual to raise it.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-48-2014]

On June 27, 2014, Greater Maricopa Foreign-Trade Zone, Inc., grantee of FTZ 277, submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board on behalf of Maxwell Technologies, Inc., within Site 10, in Peoria, Arizona.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (79 FR 38488, 07/08/2014). The FTZ Board has determined that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification is authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: October 28, 2014.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2014-26092 Filed 10-31-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### Eddie L. BARKSDALE, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Ms. BASSET, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 04-7110.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 10, 2004.

Decided Dec. 23, 2004.

*280Eddie L. Barksdale, Appellant pro se.

Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Eddie Louis Barksdale seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting the Commonwealth’s motion to dismiss Barks-dale’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition and denying his claims as procedurally defaulted. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certifícate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Barksdale has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Barks-dale’s motion for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.4

Eastern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cr−00318

Honorable Robert W. Gettleman

Olalekan Jacob Ponle

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, March 4, 2022:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman as to Olalekan Jacob

Ponle: Telephonic status hearing held on 3/4/2022. Defendant appeared telephonically on

the hearing. Telephonic status hearing set for 5/2/2022 at 9:30 a.m. The call−in number is

(888) 684−8852 and the access code is 1503395. By agreement, the Court deems the

period of time from 3/4/2022 to 5/2/2022 excludable under 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) −

interest of justice. Mailed notice (cn).

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cr-00318 Document #: 55 Filed: 03/04/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:195
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| May 8, 2008 | /s/Richard A. Smith |  
 
Richard A. Smith

 
Chief Executive Officer of FelCor Lodging

 
Trust Incorporated, as general partner of

 
FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership

 

 

  |
|-------------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 32.1

Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.

Certification Pursuant To

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted
Pursuant To

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mercury Computer Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), each of, Mark Aslett, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert E. Hult, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 1350
of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that to his knowledge the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 5,
2011



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/S/    MARK
ASLETT                   
|Mark Aslett                          
|PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    ROBERT E.
HULT                                       
|Robert E. Hult                                              
|SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND TREASURER

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
CFTC Ex. 330 

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 76-17 Filed: 11/04/21 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:706
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 76-17 Filed: 11/04/21 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:707
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 76-17 Filed: 11/04/21 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:708
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 76-17 Filed: 11/04/21 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:709