68308 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 220 / Friday, November 14, 2014 / Notices 

II. Discussion 

As discussed in Section 9.4 of the 

final Supplement 51 to the GEIS, the 

NRC staff determined that the adverse 

environmental impacts of license 

renewal for Callaway are not so great 

that preserving the option of license 

renewal for energy-planning 

decisionmakers would be unreasonable. 

This recommendation is based on: (1) 

The analysis and findings in the GEIS; 

(2) information provided in the 

environmental report and other 

documents submitted by Union Electric 

Company; (3) consultation with Federal, 

state, local, and Tribal agencies; (4) the 

NRC staff’s independent environmental 

review; and (5) consideration of public 

comments received during the scoping 

process and on the draft Supplemental 

Environmental Impact Statement. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day 

of November, 2014. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Brian D. Wittick, 

Chief, Projects Branch 2, Division of License 

Renewal, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26788 Filed 11–13–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[NRC–2014–0004] 

Aging Management of Loss of Coating 

or Lining Integrity for Internal 

Coatings/Linings on In-Scope Piping, 

Piping Components, Heat Exchangers, 

and Tanks 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Interim staff guidance; issuance. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) is issuing the final 

License Renewal Interim Staff Guidance 

(LR–ISG), LR–ISG–2013–01, ‘‘Aging 

Management of Loss of Coating or 

Lining Integrity for Internal Coatings/

Linings on In-Scope Piping, Piping 

Components, Heat Exchangers, and 

Tanks.’’ This LR–ISG provides changes 

to NRC staff-recommended aging 

management programs (AMPs), aging 

management review (AMR) items, and 

definitions in NUREG–1801, Revision 2, 

‘‘Generic Aging Lessons Learned (GALL) 

Report,’’ and the NRC staff’s Final 

Safety Analysis Report Supplement 

program descriptions and AMR items 

contained in NUREG–1800, Revision 2, 

‘‘Standard Review Plan for Review of 

License Renewal Applications for 

Nuclear Power Plants’’ (SRP–LR). 

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID 

NRC–2014–0004 when contacting the 

NRC about the availability of 

information regarding this document. 

You may obtain publicly-available 

information related to this document 

using any of the following methods: 

• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov and search 

for Docket ID NRC–2014–0004. Address 

questions about NRC dockets to Carol 

Gallagher; telephone: 301–287–3422; 

email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For 

technical questions, contact the 

individual listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 

document. 

• NRC’s Agencywide Document 

Access and Management System 

(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the NRC 

Library at http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections. For problems with 

ADAMS, please contact the NRC’s 

Public Document Room (PDR) reference 

staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, 

or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. 

The final LR–ISG–2013–01 is available 

electronically in ADAMS under 

Accession No. ML14225A059. The SRP– 

LR and GALL Report are available in 

ADAMS under Accession Nos. 

ML103490036 and ML103490041, 

respectively. 

• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and 

purchase copies of public documents at 

the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One 

White Flint North, 11555 Rockville 

Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. 

• NRC’s Interim Staff Guidance Web 

site: LR–ISG documents are also 

available online under the ‘‘License 

Renewal’’ heading at http://

www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/isg/license-renewal.html. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

William Holston, Office of Nuclear 

Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, 

DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415– 

8573; email: William.Holston@nrc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Background 

The NRC issues LR–ISGs to 

communicate insights and lessons 

learned and to address emergent issues 

not covered in license renewal guidance 

documents, such as the GALL Report 

and SRP–LR. In this way, the NRC staff 

and stakeholders may use the guidance 

in an LR–ISG document before it is 

incorporated into a formal license 

renewal guidance document revision. 

The NRC staff issues LR–ISGs in 

accordance with the LR–ISG Process, 

Revision 2 (ADAMS Accession No. 

ML100920158), for which a notice of 

availability was published in the 

Federal Register on June 22, 2010 

(75 FR 35510). 

The NRC staff has developed LR–ISG– 

2013–01 to address loss of coating or 

lining integrity for internal coatings 

applied to the internal surfaces of 

piping, piping components, heat 

exchangers, and tanks within the scope 

of license renewal. On January 10, 2014 

(79 FR 1904), the NRC requested public 

comments on draft LR–ISG–2013–01 

(ADAMS Accession No. ML13262A442). 

These changes address new 

recommendations related to managing 

loss of coating integrity for coatings 

applied to the internal surfaces of 

piping, piping components, heat 

exchangers, and tanks within the scope 

of part 54 of Title 10 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations (10 CFR), 

‘‘Requirements for Renewal of Operating 

Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants.’’ The 

NRC published Revision 2 of the SRP– 

LR and the GALL Report in December 

2010, and they are available in ADAMS 

under Accession Nos. ML103490036 

and ML103490041, respectively. 

The NRC received comments from the 

Nuclear Energy Institute by letter dated 

February 24, 2014 (ADAMS Accession 

No. ML14058A181), and Daniel L. Cox, 

PE, by letter dated February 7, 2014 

(ADAMS Accession No. ML14055A250). 

No other comments were submitted. 

The NRC considered these comments in 

developing the final LR–ISG. Detailed 

responses to the comments can be found 

in Appendix E of the final LR–ISG. 

The final LR–ISG–2013–01 is 

approved for NRC staff and stakeholder 

use and will be incorporated into NRC’s 

next formal license renewal guidance 

document revision. 

Backfitting and Issue Finality 

Issuance of this final LR–ISG does not 

constitute backfitting as defined in 10 

CFR 50.109 (the Backfit Rule) and is not 

otherwise inconsistent with the issue 

finality provisions in 10 CFR Part 52, 

‘‘Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals 

for Nuclear Power Plants.’’ As discussed 

in the ‘‘Backfitting and Issue Finality’’ 

section of the final LR–ISG–2013–01, 

the LR–ISG is directed to holders of 

operating licenses or combined licenses 

who are currently in the license renewal 

process. The LR–ISG is not directed to 

holders of operating licenses or 

combined licenses until they apply for 

license renewal. The LR–ISG is also not 

directed to licensees who already hold 

renewed operating or combined 

licenses. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 6th day 

of November, 2014. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 220 / Friday, November 14, 2014 / Notices 68309 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

3See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71657 

(Mar. 6, 2014), 79 FR 14092 (Mar. 12, 2014) (SR– 

NASDAQ–2014–020) (‘‘Notice’’). 

4See Letters to the Commission from Christopher 

Davis, President, Money Management Institute, 

dated March 27, 2014 (‘‘MMI Letter’’); Robert Tull, 

President, Robert Tull & Co., dated March 31, 2014 

(‘‘Tull Letter’’); Avi Nachmany, Co-Founder, 

Director of Research, E.V.P., Strategic Insight, dated 

Apr. 1, 2014 (‘‘Strategic Insight Letter’’); and Eric 

Noll, President and Chief Executive Officer, 

ConvergEx Group, LLC, dated Apr. 1, 2014 

(‘‘ConvergEx Letter’’). 

5 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 

6See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 72007 

(Apr. 23, 2014), 79 FR 24045 (Apr. 29, 2014) (SR– 

NASDAQ–2014–020). The Commission determined 

that it was appropriate to designate a longer period 

within which to take action on the proposed rule 

change so that it had sufficient time to consider the 

proposed rule change. Accordingly, the 

Commission designated June 10, 2014 as the date 

by which it should approve, disapprove, or institute 

proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the 

proposed rule change. 

7See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 72350 

(Jun. 9, 2014), 79 FR 33959 (Jun. 13, 2014) (SR– 

NASDAQ–2014–020) (‘‘Order Instituting 

Proceedings’’). In the Order Instituting Proceedings, 

the Commission noted, among other things, that 

questions remained as to whether the Exchange’s 

proposal is consistent with the requirements of 

Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, specifically whether it is 

designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative 

acts and practices, promotes just and equitable 

principles of trade, and protects investors and the 

public interest. 

8See Letter to the Commission from Thomas E. 

Faust, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, on 

behalf of Eaton Vance Corporation and its 

subsidiaries Eaton Vance Management and Navigate 

Fund Solution LLC (collectively, ‘‘Eaton Vance’’), 

dated July 3, 2014 (‘‘Eaton Vance Letter’’). Eaton 

Vance Management and the Eaton Vance ETMF 

Continued 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Christopher G. Miller, 

Director, Division of License Renewal, Office 

of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 2014–27042 Filed 11–13–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

Advisory Committee on Reactor 

Safeguards (ACRS), Meeting of the 

ACRS Subcommittee on Fukushima; 

Notice of Meeting 

The ACRS Subcommittee on 

Fukushima will hold a meeting on 

November 20–21, 2014, Room T–2B1, 

11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 

Maryland. 

The meeting will be open to public 

attendance with the exception of 

portions that may be closed to protect 

unclassified safeguards information 

pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3). The 

agenda for the subject meeting shall be 

as follows: 

Thursday, November 20, 2014–8:30 

a.m. Until 5:00 p.m.; Friday, November 

21, 2014–8:30 a.m. Until 12:00 p.m. 

The Subcommittee will discuss with 

the NRC staff and industry 

representatives their experience 

reviewing and responding to Order EA– 

12–049, ‘‘Order Modifying Licenses 

with Regard to Requirements for 

Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-DesignBasis External Events.’’ In addition, the 

Subcommittee will review draft 

proposed rule language and associated 

bases for codifying Order EA–12–049 as 

part of the Mitigation of Beyond-DesignBasis Events Rulemaking. The 

Subcommittee will hear presentations 

by and hold discussions with the NRC 

staff and other interested persons 

regarding this matter. The 

Subcommittee will gather information, 

analyze relevant issues and facts, and 

formulate proposed positions and 

actions, as appropriate, for deliberation 

by the Full Committee. 

Members of the public desiring to 

provide oral statements and/or written 

comments should notify the Designated 

Federal Official (DFO), Michael 

Snodderly (Telephone 301–415–2241 or 

Email: Michael.Snodderly@nrc.gov) five 

days prior to the meeting, if possible, so 

that appropriate arrangements can be 

made. Thirty-five hard copies of each 

presentation or handout should be 

provided to the DFO thirty minutes 

before the meeting. In addition, one 

electronic copy of each presentation 

should be emailed to the DFO one day 

before the meeting. If an electronic copy 

cannot be provided within this 

timeframe, presenters should provide 

the DFO with a CD containing each 

presentation at least thirty minutes 

before the meeting. Electronic 

recordings will be permitted only 

during those portions of the meeting 

that are open to the public. Detailed 

procedures for the conduct of and 

participation in ACRS meetings were 

published in the Federal Register on 

October 13, 2014 (79 FR 59307–59308). 

Detailed meeting agendas and meeting 

transcripts are available on the NRC 

Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections/acrs. Information 

regarding topics to be discussed, 

changes to the agenda, whether the 

meeting has been canceled or 

rescheduled, and the time allotted to 

present oral statements can be obtained 

from the Web site cited above or by 

contacting the identified DFO. 

Moreover, in view of the possibility that 

the schedule for ACRS meetings may be 

adjusted by the Chairman as necessary 

to facilitate the conduct of the meeting, 

persons planning to attend should check 

with these references if such 

rescheduling would result in a major 

inconvenience. 

If attending this meeting, please enter 

through the One White Flint North 

Building, 11555 Rockville Pike, 

Rockville, MD. After registering with 

security, please contact Mr. Theron 

Brown (Telephone 240–888–9835) to be 

escorted to the meeting room. 

Dated: November 5, 2014. 

Cayetano Santos, 

Chief, Technical Support Branch, Advisory 

Committee on Reactor Safeguards. 

[FR Doc. 2014–27035 Filed 11–13–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–73562; File No. SR– 

NASDAQ–2014–020] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The 

NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of 

Filing of Amendment No. 1 and Order 

Granting Accelerated Approval of a 

Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by 

Amendment No. 1 Thereto, Relating to 

Listing and Trading of ExchangeTraded Managed Fund Shares 

November 7, 2014. 

I. Introduction 

On February 26, 2014, The NASDAQ 

Stock Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’ or 

‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities 

and Exchange Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section 

19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act 

of 1934 (‘‘Act’’ or ‘‘Exchange Act’’) 1 and 

Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule 

change to adopt Nasdaq Rule 5745, 

which would govern the listing and 

trading of Exchange-Traded Managed 

Fund Shares (‘‘ETMF Shares’’ or 

‘‘ETMFs’’), and to amend related 

references under Nasdaq Rules 4120, 

5615, IM–5615–4, and 5940. The 

proposed rule change was published for 

comment in the Federal Register on 

March 12, 2014.3 The Commission 

initially received four comment letters 

on the proposal.4 On April 23, 2014, 

pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,5

the Commission designated a longer 

period within which to either approve 

the proposed rule change, disapprove 

the proposed rule change, or institute 

proceedings to determine whether to 

disapprove the proposed rule change.6

On June 9, 2014, the Commission 

instituted proceedings to determine 

whether to approve or disapprove the 

proposed rule change.7 In response to 

the Order Instituting Proceedings, the 

Commission received one comment 

letter on the proposal.8 On September 4, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES