alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Alloway v. Sibert, on Appeal.

DEBT on three promissory notes dated in *August,*1821: the' first payable two years, after dáte, the second three years after date, and the third four years after date.. Flea, that the notes were given in part consideration of certain town lots in *West* port,'Oldham*county, state of *Kentucky; .*that at the time the notes were given, the plaintiff executed-.to the defendant á title-bond, conditioned for the conveyance of the lots to the defendant, on the payment of the note lastfo fall due; that the .plaintiff never had' any title to the.lots, and never made any to the defendant; and that,,therefore, the consideration of the notes had failed, Replication, that the consideration had not failed in. manner and form, &c.'

It was proved, on the trial, that there -was no deed of conveyance. for the lots to the plaintiff; recorded in the clerk’s office of *Henry*county, state of *Kentucky;*-but it did not appear, that the records of that office furnished any evidence as to the title óf real estate in the county of *Oldham*aforesaid, in which the lots in question were situate. It was also proved, that the deféndant had been in possession of the premises ever since the date of the notes, without any interruption except as to some small part; and as to that part, it did not appear that the interruption was in. consequence of any legal claim.

*Held,*that the plea was not sustained by the evidence, and that the plaintiff was entitled to judgment-.
H. Res. 471

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 17, 1998.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 2646) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of

1986 to allow tax-free expenditures from education individual

retirement accounts for elementary and secondary school expenses, to increase the maximum annual amount of contributions to such accounts, and for other purposes. All points of

order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered

as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of CompX  International  Inc.  (the
Company)  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  March 31,  2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David A.
Bowers, Vice Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



/s/David A. Bowers
----------------------------------------
David A. Bowers
Vice Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
May 2, 2005






Note: The certification  the registrant  furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed
"filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  as
amended,  or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  Registration
Statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference,  except as otherwise  expressly
stated in such filing.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.4

Eastern Division

Energy Intelligence Group, Inc., et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03983

Honorable Joan B. Gottschall

Constellation Energy Generation, LLC.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, March 23, 2022:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Enter memorandum

opinion and order granting the motion [51] of Energy Intelligence Group, Inc., and Energy

Intelligence Group (UK) Ltd. to dismiss Constellation Energy Generation, LLC's,

counterclaims for failure to state a claim. In accordance with the order, Constellation

Energy Generation, LLC, may, if it wishes, file an amended answer on or before

4/13/2022. Mailed notice(mjc, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03983 Document #: 93 Filed: 03/23/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1425
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-1999
<CASH>                                           1,204
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,191
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (965)
<INVENTORY>                                     15,099
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,314
<PP&E>                                           4,469
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,581)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 113,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,578
<BONDS>                                          7,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           20,850
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            69
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,166
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   113,585
<SALES>                                         24,476
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,476
<CGS>                                           11,218
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,218
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,416
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 794
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    967
<INCOME-TAX>                                       368
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                589
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       419
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
II 

Calendar No. 565 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3855 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 21, 2004 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

JUNE 7, 2004 

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 607 Pershing Drive in Laclede, Missouri, as 

the ‘‘General John J. Pershing Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 607 Pershing Drive in Laclede, Missouri, shall 

6 be known and designated as the ‘‘General John J. Per7 shing Post Office’’. 
2 

•HR 3855 RS 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘General John J. Pershing Post Office’’. 

Calendar No. 565 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3855 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postshing Post Office’’. Laclede, Missouri, as the ‘‘General John J. Per- al Service located at 607 Pershing Drive in 

JUNE 7, 2004 

Reported without amendment
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 1 of 26 PageID #:8
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 2 of 26 PageID #:9
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 3 of 26 PageID #:10
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 4 of 26 PageID #:11
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 5 of 26 PageID #:12
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 6 of 26 PageID #:13
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 7 of 26 PageID #:14
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 8 of 26 PageID #:15
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 9 of 26 PageID #:16
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 10 of 26 PageID #:17
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 11 of 26 PageID #:18
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 12 of 26 PageID #:19
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 13 of 26 PageID #:20
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 14 of 26 PageID #:21
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 15 of 26 PageID #:22
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 16 of 26 PageID #:23
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 17 of 26 PageID #:24
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 18 of 26 PageID #:25
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 19 of 26 PageID #:26
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 20 of 26 PageID #:27
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 21 of 26 PageID #:28
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 22 of 26 PageID #:29
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 23 of 26 PageID #:30
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 24 of 26 PageID #:31
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 25 of 26 PageID #:32
Case: 1:20-cv-04457 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 26 of 26 PageID #:33
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2001.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Delek Resources, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leonard
Sternheim, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 22, 2004

                                /s/ Leonard Sternheim
                                ----------------------------
                                Leonard Sternheim, President
#### Kenneth PULLUM, Petitioner—Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 04-7091.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 2004.

Decided Dec. 21, 2004.

Kenneth Pullum, Appellant pro se. Michael Thomas Judge, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Pullum, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000), and denying reconsideration. The orders are not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Pullum has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONFURNISHED PURSUANT TO**

 

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

** SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Pliant Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Harold C. Bevis,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)             The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)             The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ HAROLD C. BEVIS        |
|--------|----------------------------|
|   | Harold C. Bevis            |
|   | *Chief  Executive Officer* |
|   |                       |
|   | August 14, 2008       |

 

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) I, John S. Reiland, of US Dataworks, Inc. certify pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004
(the Report), which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of US
Dataworks, Inc. Dated: August 16, 2004 / s/ John S. ReilandJohn S. ReilandChief Financial Officer
#### Wm. A. Crider *v.*Peter Smith.

Appeals and Errors — Amendments on Reversal.

On the return of the case from the Court of Appeals, the court below has the same power to permit amended pleadings to be filed, that it had before the reversal of the judgment.

February 22, 1872.

APPEAL FROM OLDHAM CIRCUIT COURT.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Pryor:

It was not proper for this court to suggest that amended pleadings might be filed in the case, as the only defense set up *25was a want of consideration for the note sued on by Wm. A. Crider and this defense was held' not to be good1. On the return of the case, however, the court below has the same power to permit amended pleadings to be filed, that it had before the reversal of the judgment. The petition for a modification of the opinion is overruled.

*Rodman, DeHaven, for appellants.*

*Lee & Rodman, Carroll, Jor appellees.*
#### Abiodun O. THOMPSON, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States.

No. 04-1242.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) Nov. 19, 2004.

Decided Dec. 6, 2004.

Albert Van-Lare, Law Offices of Albert Van-Lare, New York, NY, for Petitioner.

David V. Bernal, Douglas E. Ginsburg, John D. Williams, Jamie M. Dowd, United States Department of Justice Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before SCIRICA, Chief Judge, and McKEE and CHERTOFF, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

CHERTOFF, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Abiodun O. Thompson was ordered removed to Nigeria because he was convicted of an aggravated felony, namely theft of government funds in an amount over $10,000, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A). The Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed the removal. Our jurisdiction to review that decision is limited to the legal question whether the crime of which Thompson was convicted is an aggravated felony under the statute. *See Drakes v. Zimski,*240 F.3d 246, 247 (3d Cir.2001).

The aggravated felony which was applied to Thompson was 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(M), covering an “offense that ... involves fraud or deceit in which the loss to the victim or victims exceeds $ 10,-000.” On this appeal, Thompson concedes that he violated 18 U.S.C. § 641, and that § 641 is an offense involving fraud or deceit. He also acknowledges that he was ordered to pay restitution of $ 17,547 as part of his sentence, which exceeds the required $ 10,000 loss of the victim under subsection (43)(M). But Thompson argues that he was charged in an indictment which alleged two offenses, 18 U.S.C. § 641 and § 642, and that since he only *818pled guilty to § 641, it is impossible to determine whether the restitution amount applied to § 641 or § 642.

This argument rests entirely on a false premise. Thompson was not charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 641 and § 642. He was charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 641 and § 2 — the latter, of course, being not a separate offense but merely the statute that allows aiders and abettors to be punished as if they were principals. The charging information, plea, and judgment are completely consistent that Thompson was accused of, and pled guilty to a single offense: violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. The restitution amount applied to that single count. The decision of the Immigration Judge and the Board are completely correct and consistent on this point. Petitioner’s claim that there is some ambiguity in the criminal proceedings is entirely the product of his own confusion.

Since Petitioner was convicted of an aggravated felony, we lack jurisdiction to conduct any further review, and we will dismiss the petition.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

WHAM-O HOLDING, LTD. and 

INTERSPORT CORP. d/b/a WHAM-O, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”,

Defendants.

Case No.: 1:20-cv-04201

Judge Jorge L. Alonso

Magistrate Judge Heather M. McShain

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby files this Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal, without prejudice, as to the following Defendant(s) identified on Schedule A of the 

Complaint:

NO. DEFENDANT

191 stanali8980

48 ainiiwode85

216 wws671

185 sold-eassy

77 digital-mart8

228 zhuangjian6

90 fly.planet

DATED: September 28, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt (Bar No. 6207971)

Keith Vogt, Ltd.

111 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1700

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Telephone: 312-675-6079

E-mail: keith@vogtip.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case: 1:20-cv-04201 Document #: 20 Filed: 09/28/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:3287
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document was electronically filed on September 28, 2020 with the Clerk of the Court using the 

CM/ECF system, which will automatically send an email notification of such filing to all registered 

attorneys of record.

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt

Case: 1:20-cv-04201 Document #: 20 Filed: 09/28/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:3288
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

October 13, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 128130 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan MARIA L. LYLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 128130 COA: 257689 WCAC: 02-000481 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 20, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH , W EAVER , and K ELLY , JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

t1006 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 13, 2005

Clerk
EXHIBIT 10.6



EXHIBIT 10.6


 

Andrei Stytsenko

1811 East 17th Avenue

Spokane, WA 99203



 

METALEX RESOURCES, INC.

1811 East 17th Avenue

Spokane, WA 99203


 

June 7, 2004


 

Dear Sirs:


RE:   Red Eagle Claims


I, Andrei Stytsenko, hold in trust for Metalex Resources, Inc., a 100% undivided interest in the following claims located in the Lillooet Mining Division:


	
Claim Number
	
Number of Units
	
Record Number
	
Expiry Date

	 	 	 	 
	
Red Eagle #1
	
1
	
406637
	
October 31, 2004

	
Red Eagle #2
	
1
	
406638
	
October 31, 2004

	
Red Eagle #3
	
1
	
406639
	
October 31, 2004

	
Red Eagle #4
	
1
	
406640
	
October 31, 2004






 

I will deliver full title on demand to Metalex Resources, Inc. for as long as the claims are in good standing with the Province of British Columbia.


 

Yours truly,


/s/ Andrei Stytsenko

Andrei Stytsenko

President
H. Res. 541

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 17, 1998.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 128)

making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1999,

and for other purposes. The joint resolution shall be considered as read for amendment. The previous question shall be

considered as ordered on the joint resolution to final passage

without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate

equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking

minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and

(2) one motion to recommit.

Attest:

Clerk.