alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

November 1, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00667

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.E.S., A CHILD

,

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 02849
Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights which must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. The reporter’s record was due to be filed by October 23, 2017. On October 30, 2017, the court reporter responsible for preparing the record filed a notification of late record requesting an extension of time to file the record to November 6, 2017. The notification of late record is NOTED. It is ORDERED that the reporter’s record must be filed in this appeal no later than November 6, 2017. Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 1st day of November, 20 17

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Subject: EXT :FW: Supply Chain Governance 

Date: Thursday, March 9, 2023 1:45:01 PM 

Attachments: image001.png 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening 

attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. 

FYI 

Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2023 10:50 AM 

To: cyberframework <cyberframework@nist.gov> 

Subject: Supply Chain Governance 

Hi, 

Thank you for holding the workshop and leading this critical work. 

Few comments from Kevin and Jon prompted me to send some thoughts on supply chain risk 

management from a governance point of view. I will not be able to attend the supply chain panel. 

Governance can also play a key role in managing and mitigating third party risks. It starts by tiering 

your suppliers by risk presented to your organization (if they are down or compromised) 

1. For critical suppliers, at a minimum, have full visibility into their critical dependencies, their 

third parties (fourth parties). Including use of industry utilities. 

2. Set risk metrics / thresholds that can be used to assess suppliers in those tiers. And ensure 

contractually that the third parties are obligated to report to you on those metrics. 

3. Examples of metrics could be -

a. Do they have / use a CSF or equivalent framework 

b. Do they have / test their Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity capability and does 

that include cyber 

c. Do they have good cyber hygiene ...to deal with phishing, social engineering, weak 

passwords, and timely patching of vulnerabilities. Do they train their employees. 

Governance can ensure that your third parties are obligated to not just report to you but periodically 

join your BCP/cyber exercises. 

Best, 

Sumeet 

Sumeet Chabria 

Founder and CEO, ThoughtLinks Group
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



In connection with the Annual Report of Eagle Hospitality Properties Trust, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Thomas A. Frederick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                          
|--------------------------
|/S/    THOMAS A.
FREDERICK
|Thomas A. Frederick       
|Chief Financial Officer   
|                          
|March 28, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,149
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,984
<PP&E>                                         984,564
<DEPRECIATION>                                (34,283)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 970,414
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,106
<BONDS>                                        507,540
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           249
<OTHER-SE>                                     294,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   970,414
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,208
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,045
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,227
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,225
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,225
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,225
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.91


</TABLE>
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: David Mayberry v. Ronald 

Watts, et al. 

Case Number: 20 CV 2926 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for: 

City of Chicago, Philip Cline, Debra Kirby and Karen Rowan 

Attorney name (type or print): Terrence M. Burns 

Firm: Reiter Burns LLP 

Street address: 311 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 5200 

City/State/Zip: Chicago, IL 60606 

Bar ID Number: 3122331 

(See item 3 in instructions) 

Telephone Number: 312 982-0090 

 

Email Address: tburns@reiterburns.com 

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case? Yes No 

Are you acting as local counsel in this case? Yes No 

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar? Yes No 

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? Yes No 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel 

 Appointed Counsel 

 If appointed counsel, are you a 

 

 Federal Defender 

 CJA Panel Attorney 

______________________________________________________________________ 

In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this Court’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 U.S.C.§1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath. 

Executed on June 26, 2020 

Attorney signature: S/ Terrence M. Burns 

 (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.) 

 Revised 8/1/2015 

Case: 1:20-cv-02926 Document #: 22 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:67
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4821-8331-6670.1 08816/00080 – 1 –

STIPULATION TO TRANSFER VENUE; ORDER THEREON

Ronald L. Richman (SBN 139189)

BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY PC

101 Montgomery Street, Suite 2600 

San Francisco, CA 94104-4146

Telephone: 415.352.2700

Facsimile: 415.352.2701

E-mail: ron.richman@bullivant.com

Attorneys for Defendant

TANGOCODE, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ASSOCIATED VOLUME BUYERS, INC., a 

Cooperative Corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

TANGOCODE, INC., and DOES 1-25,

Defendants.

Case No.: 2:20-CV-00774-JAM-AC

STIPULATION TO TRANSFER VENUE; 

ORDER THEREON;

DATE: June 16, 2020

TIME: 1:30 p.m.

CTRM: 6, 14th Floor

501 I Street

Sacramento, CA

Hon. John A. Mendez

Case: 1:20-cv-03302 Document #: 7 Filed: 06/03/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:160
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4821-8331-6670.1 08816/00080 – 2 –

STIPULATION TO TRANSFER VENUE; ORDER THEREON

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Associated Volume 

Buyers, Inc., on the one hand, and defendant TangoCode, Inc., on the other hand, through their 

respective counsel, that this Court grant defendant TangoCode, Inc.’s motion to transfer venue 

to the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois. 

DATED: June 2, 2020

BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY PC

By /s/ Ronald L. Richman

Ronald L. Richman

Attorneys for Defendant

TANGOCODE, INC.

DATED: June 2, 2020

CARSON & KYUNG, A LAW CORPORATION

By /s/ Trevor Carson

Trevor Carson

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ASSOCIATED VOLUME BUYERS, INC.

Case: 1:20-cv-03302 Document #: 7 Filed: 06/03/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:161
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4821-8331-6670.1 08816/00080 – 3 –

STIPULATION TO TRANSFER VENUE; ORDER THEREON

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION BY THE PARTIES:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant’s motion to transfer venue be, and hereby is 

granted, that this case be transferred to the United States District Court, Northern District of 

Illinois. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court enter this Order and that along with 

this file, a copy of this Order shall be forwarded to the Clerk of Court for the United States 

District Court, Northern District of Illinois.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 2, 2020

 /s/ John A. Mendez______________

HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ

United States District Court Judge

*****

Case: 1:20-cv-03302 Document #: 7 Filed: 06/03/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:162
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 23, 2013

d1216 

# Order

Clerk December 23, 2013

148002 & (20)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148002

COA: 314281

RANDY SCOTT ANGER, Oakland CC: 2007

- 218338

- FH

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED.

The application for leave to appeal the October 8 , 2013 order of the Court of Appeals is

considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of

establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL**

**EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this annual report of Profire Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the *"Report"*), I, Brenton W. Hatch , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date:  | July 8, 2009 |   | By:    | /s/ Brenton W. Hatch    |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |         |   |   | Brenton W. Hatch        |   |
|   |         |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|        |              |        |        |                         |        |  |
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF W&T OFFSHORE, INC.

The subsidiaries of W&T
Offshore, Inc. are listed below.



|                                 |  |                      |          |  |              |  |       |  
|-------------------------------- |  | -------------------- | -------- |  | ------------ |  | ----- | -
|Name                             |  | State ofOrganization |          |  | PercentOwned | 
|N.O. Properties LLC              |  |                      | Delaware |  |              |  | 100.0 | %
|W&T Energy VI, LLC               |  |                      | Delaware |  |              |  | 100.0 | %
|W&T Energy VII, LLC              |  |                      | Delaware |  |              |  | 100.0 | %
|White Shoal Pipeline Corporation |  |                      | Delaware |  |              |  | 73.4  | %
```
                 United States Court of Appeals
                     For the First Circuit

No.  98-1399

                         ELAINE VALERIO,

                      Plaintiff, Appellant,

                                v.

                 PUTNAM ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED,

                       Defendant, Appellee.

                          ERRATA SHEET

     The opinion of this Court issued on April 9, 1999 is amended
as follows:

     On p.12, line 4 of the slip opinion, the end of the sentence
after "(8th Cir. 1975)," should be replaced to read:

while the Second Circuit, as well as a previous panel of the
Ninth Circuit, have held that a formal complaint to the
government agency or a court is required.  Lambert v. Genesee
Hospital, 10 F.3d 46 (2d Cir. 1993); see also Lambert v. Ackerly,
156 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir. 1998), withdrawn and reh'g granted, 169
F.3d 666 (9th Cir. 1999).
     
On p.12, line 12 of the slip opinion, the end of the sentence
after "court or agency," should be replaced to read:  
     

the Second Circuit concluded that � 215(a)(3) is unambiguous. 
See Genesee Hospital, 10 F.3d at 55.
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
for the periods covered in the Report.
  /s/         Eric W. FinlaysonEric W. FinlaysonSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Prinzo & Associates, LLC

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03256

Honorable Gary Feinerman

BMO Harris Bank, N.A., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Sunday, September 6, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:. Given Plaintiff's filing of a

first amended complaint [33], which is its sole amendment of right under Civil Rule

15(a)(1), motion to dismiss [26] is denied as moot.Mailed notice.(jlj, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03256 Document #: 34 Filed: 09/06/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:203
**Exhibit 10.10****Mercantile Bancorp, Inc.****Employment Agreement**     **This Employment Agreement**(the “**Agreement**”) is made and entered into effective as of January1, 2008 (“**Effective Date**”), by and between Mercantile Bancorp, Inc., a Delaware corporation(“**Company**”), with its principal office located at Quincy, Illinois, and Daniel J. Cook, of Quincy,Illinois (“**Employee**”).**RECITALS**     A. Company is a bank holding company.     B. Employee is currently employed by Company, pursuant to the terms of an employment agreementdated March 1, 2007 (the “**Prior Employment Agreement**”), in the position of Executive Vice Presidentand Chief Investment Officer of Company.     C. Company desires to continue the employment of Employee in the position of Executive VicePresident and Chief Investment Officer of Company on the terms, covenants and conditions set forthin this Agreement.     D. Employee desires to continue in the employ of Company in the position of Executive VicePresident and Chief Investment Officer of Company on the terms, covenants and conditions set forthin this Agreement.     E. Company and Employee desire to enter into this Agreement as of the Effective Date and thisAgreement shall supersede all of the terms and conditions of all prior employment terms andconditions, whether or not in writing, including the Prior Employment Agreement and any such prioremployment agreement shall become null and void as of the Effective Date, and the partiesthereunder shall have no rights or interests therein.     **NOW, THEREFORE,**in consideration of the premises and of the covenants and agreementhereinafter contained, it is covenanted and agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows:**ARTICLE I**
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
               (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



I, YU-EN CHIU, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of Kid
Castle Educational Corporation (the "Registrant"), certifies that to the best of
my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended September 30, 2002 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




      /s/ Yu-En Chiu
------------------------------
Name:  Yu-En Chiu
Date: April 15, 2003


                                  Exhibit 99.2
H. Res. 323

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 12, 1997.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 2159) making appropriations for foreign operations, export financing, and related programs for the fiscal

year ending September 30, 1998, and for other purposes. All

points of order against the conference report and against its

consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
Four Grantees win Nobel Prize in Physics 

The 2005 award of the Nobel Prize in Physics to Theodor W. Hänsch of the Max-PlanckInstitut für Quantenoptik Garching and Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, along 

with John L. Hall of NIST at Boulder, JILA, and the University of Colorado at Boulder, 

and Roy J. Glauber of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, brought to four the number 

of NIST Precision Measurement Grant awardees who have gone on to win the Nobel 

Prize. Hänsch was awarded a Precision Measurement Grant in 1974 for work on 

precision laser spectroscopy of one-electron atoms. The other Grant recipients who 

subsequently won the Nobel prize are Carl E. Wieman of the University of Colorado at 

Boulder and JILA, Steven Chu of the US Department of Energy, and Daniel C. Tsui of 

Princeton University.
Exhibit 10 (c)

LETTER OF INTENT

October 22, 2003

The parties, listed below, hereby execute this Letter of Intent:

Karting International Inc.                  Super Sport International Ltd.
2251 N. Rampart Blvd., Ste. 323             PO Box 296
Las Vegas, NV                               Hereford, HR1 4YJ, UK

The parties have agreed to pursue an arrangement whereby Karting
International Inc. ("KTGI") will purchase 100% of Super Sport
International Ltd. ("SSI").

The parties agree to negotiate in good faith always keeping in mind that the
benefits to the shareholders of both companies are foremost.

Initial agreement is hereby confirmed that both parties wish to accomplish the
transaction in the quickest possible manner and will use their best efforts to
accomplish the due diligence in a timely manner.

Both parties understand that an audit is required of both companies' financial
matters and agree to cause the audits to be done as soon as possible.

Either party has the right to back out of negotiations at any time without cause
until the time that the desired transaction is closed.

We agree on this date to the terms stated above.

For Karting International Inc.              For Super Sport
                                              International Ltd.

-----------------------------               --------------------------
Paul Gastwirth, President                   David Hutchinson,
Managing Dir.
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated License Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.17 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED LICENSE AGREEMENT 
  
 THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 to that certain Amended and Restated License Agreement dated
October 17, 2000, by and between IntraLase, Inc. (“LICENSEE”) and Escalon Medical Corporation (“ESCALON”) (the “License Agreement”) is effective as of the date executed by both LICENSEE and ESCALON (the “Effective
Date”). 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, LICENSEE and ESCALON hereby agree as
follows: 
  
 1. Paragraph 2.2 of the License Agreement shall be
deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 
  
 “2.2 “Field of Use” shall refer to the field of laser medical instruments designed for human health and human cosmetic applications.” 
  
 2. Except as specifically amended in Paragraph 1 of this Amendment No. 1, all other terms and conditions of the License
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1 in duplicate originals by their duly authorized officers or representatives. 
  

									
	FOR LICENSEE	 	 	 	FOR ESCALON MEDICAL CORPORATION
					
	 By
	 	
	 	 	 	 By
	 	  


	 	 	(authorized representative)	 	 	 	 	 	(authorized representative)
	 Typed
Name                                       
                                      
 
	 	 	 	 Typed
Name                                       
                                      
 

			
	 Title                                     
                                        
                 
	 	 	 	 Title                                     
                                        
                 

			
	 Date                                      
                                        
                
	 	 	 	 Date