alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FELCOR LODGING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SEPTEMBER
30, 2000 10Q
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          46,005
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,159
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,164
<PP&E>                                       4,194,060
<DEPRECIATION>                                 434,388
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,148,888
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          148,527
<BONDS>                                      1,853,491
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    293,265
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,802,946
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,148,888
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               405,146
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             117,812
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,226
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,226
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,865)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,614
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Clyde W. TAYLOR, Jr, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-60491.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Nov. 11, 2004.

James Donald Maxwell, Jr., U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Bobby T. Vance, Batesville, MS, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, Chief Judge, JONES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Clyde W. Taylor, Jr., appeals from -his sentence following a guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to manufacture and attempt to manufacture methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) and 846. Taylor argues that the district court erro*910neously held him accountable under relevant conduct for drug quantities found on the person and in the vehicle of co-defendant Tammie Renee Parker. He also argues that the district court failed to use the weight of the pure methamphetamine when determining his offense level and erroneously denied him a mitigating role adjustment.

Taylor was observed exiting a Bally’s Casino with Parker and co-defendant Richard Lane Hensley, Parker’s husband, after a confidential source reported that Hensley and Taylor were staying in a motel room that contained a methamphetamine lab and that Hensley was about to “cook a batch” of methamphetamine. Taylor left in a separate vehicle from Parker and Hensley. Hensley and Parker were then stopped while on their way to meet Taylor at the motel room, which served as the base of operation for producing methamphetamine. Hensley had just purchased precursor materials. Taylor assisted in the production of the methamphetamine by also purchasing precursor chemicals and by providing transportation for Hensley.

We conclude that the district court did not clearly err by attributing the drug quantities seized from both Hensley and Parker to Taylor under relevant conduct. *See*U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3; *see also United States v. Rogers,*1 F.3d 341, 344-45 (5th Cir.1993). A review of the record and the presentence report (“PSR”) further shows that there is no error in Taylor’s sentence based on the calculation of drug weight because the PSR attributed a lesser amount of drugs to Taylor than it might have based on the pure weight of the methamphetamine. Finally, the district court did not clearly err by denying Taylor a mitigating role adjustment because Taylor’s conduct was not peripheral to the advancement of the illicit activity. *See United States v. Tremelling,*43 F.3d 148, 153 (5th Cir.1995); *United States v. Harris,*932 F.2d 1529, 1539 (5th Cir.1991).

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Iron Cliffs Company v. George L. Beecher.

*Deed in trust with power to seU.*

An instrument executed for tile benefit of specified creditors, and purporting to convey property to certain persons who were also creditors, on their express agreement to sell it and pay the debts as far as the proceeds would go, and, if there should be any surplus, pay other debts, and sell back to the grantors any unsold property in case they should furnish money, within a year, to pay off the secured debts, is not a chattel mortgage, but a deed in trust vesting trustees with absolute title and right of sale until the trust purposes should be accomplished.

Error to Marquette. (Grant, J.)

April 25.

April 27.

Replevin. Defendant brings error.

Affirmed.

*Ball & Hanscom*for appellant.

*F. O. Clark*for appellee.

A bill of sale absolute on its face but accompanied by a verbal defeasance is a mortgage, not only as between the parties but as to third persons having notice: Jones on Chattel Mortgages § 22; *Omaha Book Co. v. Sutherland*10 Neb. 334; any instrument or bill of sale held as security on personal property for a debt, the property remaining in the hands of the debtor, is fraudulent and void as against creditors purchasing such property without notice of the existence of the instrument: Comp. L. § 4706 ; *Anderson v. Brenneman*44 Mich. 199.

*487Campbell, J.

This was an action of replevin for an engine, which plaintiff claimed under a sale from Ball & Owen, who held a paper the character of which is disputed by defendant, who insists it was a chattel mortgage and void as against creditors for want of record or change of possession. The character of the instrument is the only matter now in dispute. If not a mortgage plaintiff’s title should prevail.

The instrument was dated November 24, 1877, and executed by the Pacific Rolling Mill Company for the benefit of several creditors. It purported on its face to convey this with other property to Ball & Owen, a firm of attorneys at Marquette, who had a personal claim and also had charge of other claims, upon the express agreement of the grantees to sell the property on the best terms they could get and pay the debts named as far as the proceeds would go, the grantors agreeing to pay any deficiency. Provision was also made for paying certain other debts if there should be any surplus, and for selling back to the grantors any unsold property, if they should within a year furnish money to pay off the secured debts.

It is impossible to treat this document as a mortgage. It provided for and required sales to be made absolutely, and not upon any defeasance. The grantees were trustees to sell, and that was their primary duty. The provisions concerning any surplus were no more than would be proper in relation to the resulting trust which would belong to the grantors after the debts were extinguished. The transfer must be considered as a plain and express conveyance in trust, vesting the trustees with an absolute title and right of sale until the trust purposes were accomplished.

The court below took this view and the judgment must be affirmed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.
20 CR 327

Honorable Maria Valdez

United States Magistrate Judge

FILED 6/26/2020

THOMAS G. BRUTON CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 1 of 27 PageID #:1
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 2 of 27 PageID #:2
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 3 of 27 PageID #:3
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 4 of 27 PageID #:4
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 5 of 27 PageID #:5
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 6 of 27 PageID #:6
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 7 of 27 PageID #:7
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 8 of 27 PageID #:8
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 9 of 27 PageID #:9
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 10 of 27 PageID #:10
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 11 of 27 PageID #:11
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 12 of 27 PageID #:12
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 13 of 27 PageID #:13
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 14 of 27 PageID #:14
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 15 of 27 PageID #:15
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 16 of 27 PageID #:16
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 17 of 27 PageID #:17
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 18 of 27 PageID #:18
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 19 of 27 PageID #:19
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 20 of 27 PageID #:20
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 21 of 27 PageID #:21
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 22 of 27 PageID #:22
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 23 of 27 PageID #:23
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 24 of 27 PageID #:24
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 25 of 27 PageID #:25
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 26 of 27 PageID #:26
Case: 1:20-cr-00327 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 27 of 27 PageID #:27
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN THIS REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIREDTY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-30-1998
<CASH>                                         154,458
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  390,882
<ALLOWANCES>                                   15,000
<INVENTORY>                                    405,005
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,373,446
<PP&E>                                         8,745,154
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,803,253
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,208,897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,320,789
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    14
<COMMON>                                       350
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,751,567
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,208,897
<SALES>                                        3,954,551
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,954,551
<CGS>                                          2,324,826
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,324,826
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               80,469
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             157,608
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (114,455)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (114,455)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (114,455)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.03)
        

</TABLE>
r. = a to the CSF v2.0 Core

Date: Friday, June 16, 2023 8:04:16 AM
Attachments: image001.pnq

To Whom It May Concern:

| appreciate the opportunity to provide comments to the National Institute for Standards and
Technolog ’s (NIST) Discussion Draft of the Cybersecurity Framework Core 2.0. |

commend the continued efforts of NIST to ensure that the next version of the CSF is
forward-looking, clear, addresses developments in technology and risk, and improves
alignment with national and international cybersecurity standards and practices.

| appreciate that NIST included a “Govern” Function in the next version of the NIST CSF. |
know that good governance is critical for cyber risk management, and it helps enable and
ensure the success of an organization implementing the other critical functions and
associated controls.

Additionally, | commend NIST for addressing supply chain risk management in the CSF 2.0
Core, but we believe NIST could do so more effectively and efficiently for organizations by
creating a new Supply Chain Function. One of the tremendous values of the NIST CSF
and, by extension, the Cyber Risk Institute (CRI) Profile, is its ability to absorb new controls
to mitigate threats as the cybersecurity threat and technology landscape changes.
However, without a Supply Chain Function, the CSF risks not keeping pace with the ever-
evolving cybersecurity landscape that practitioners are busy facing every day.

| respectfully urge NIST to create a separate Supply Chain Function to address the growing
importance of supply chain risk management considerations, as called for by CRI.

Thank you,

James Maxwell
Chief Information Security Officer
Amalgamated Bank of Chicago

www,aboc.com

(Q) AMALGAMATED

Bank of Chicago
Exhibit 10.9
 Mercantile Bancorp, Inc.
 Employment Agreement
 This Employment Agreement Agreement Effective Date Company Employee
 RECITALS
  Prior Employment Agreement
    NOW, THEREFORE,
 ARTICLE I
EMPLOYMENT
 Company Employs Employee.
 Employee Accepts Employment.




---



##### 



ARTICLE II
TERM OF EMPLOYMENT
 Term. Term Term
 ARTICLE III
COMPENSATION
 Salary.
 Incentive Bonus.
 Business Expenses.
 Benefits.
 ARTICLE IV
DISABILITY
 Suspension of Agreement.
 2




---



##### 



Code
   ARTICLE V
TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
 Death.
 Termination for Cause. Cause
    3




---



##### 



Subsidiary
 Effect of Termination Under Section 5.1 or 5.2.
 Termination Without Cause.
 Termination by Employee
 Termination by Company
 Severance Amount provided, however,
  4




---



##### 



Termination On Account of Change in Control
      Good Reason
 5




---



##### 



Compensation
  ARTICLE VI
NON-COMPETITION AND NON-SOLICITATION
 Terms of Covenant. Restrictive Area Restrictive Period
  6




---



##### 



Financial Institution provided
however,
    7




---



##### 



ARTICLE VII
CONFIDENTIALITY AND NON-DISCLOSURE
 Confidential Information. Confidential Information
  Dispute Resolution.
 ARTICLE VIII
GENERAL PROVISIONS
 Modifications.
 Notices.
 To Company:
    
    Mercantile Bancorp, Inc.440 Maine StreetQuincy, Illinois 62301
 8




---



##### 



To Employee:
    
    Michael P. McGrath421 South 14th StreetQuincy, Illinois 62301
  Entire Agreement; Survival.
 Waivers.
 Binding Effect.
 Assignment.
 Construction.
 Severability.
 Governing Law.
 Arbitration.
 9




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 Mercantile Bancorp, Inc.By:
    
    /s/ Ted T. AwerkampIts:
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Michel P. McGrathMichael P. McGrath
 10
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Anthony Mays v. Ronald Watts, 

et al. 

Case Number: 20 CV 3228 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for: 

City of Chicago, Philip Cline, Debra Kirby and Karen Rowan 

Attorney name (type or print): Paul A. Michalik 

Firm: Reiter Burns LLP 

Street address: 311 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 5200 

City/State/Zip: Chicago, IL 60606 

Bar ID Number: 6198674 

(See item 3 in instructions) 

Telephone Number: 312 982-0090 

 

Email Address: pmichalik@reiterburns.com 

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case? Yes No 

Are you acting as local counsel in this case? Yes No 

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar? Yes No 

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? Yes No 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel 

 Appointed Counsel 

 If appointed counsel, are you a 

 

 Federal Defender 

 CJA Panel Attorney 

______________________________________________________________________ 

In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this Court’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 U.S.C.§1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath. 

Executed on July 29, 2020 

Attorney signature: S/ Paul A. Michalik 

 (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.) 

 Revised 8/1/2015 

Case: 1:20-cv-03228 Document #: 18 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:62
H. Res. 510

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 29, 1998.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 4328) making appropriations for the Department of Transportation and related agencies for the fiscal

year ending September 30, 1999, and for other purposes. The

first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. Points of

order against consideration of the bill for failure to comply

with clause 7 of rule XXI or section 401(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 are waived. General debate shall

be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally

divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on Appropriations. After general

debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the

five-minute rule. The amendments printed in the report of

the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall

be considered as adopted in the House and in the Committee
2

•HRES 510 EH

of the Whole. Points of order against provisions in the bill,

as amended, for failure to comply with clause 2 or 6 of rule

XXI are waived except as follows: beginning with ‘‘, of

which’’, on page 11, line 19, through ‘‘Fund’’ on line 20;

page 16, lines 20 through 24; beginning with ‘‘: Provided’’ on

page 18, line 2, through ‘‘motor carriers’’ on line 5; and page

54, lines 4 through 8. Where points of order are waived

against part of a paragraph, points of order against a provision in another part of such paragraph may be made only

against such provision and not against the entire paragraph.

During consideration of the bill for further amendment, the

Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority

in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering

an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of

the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in

clause 6 of rule XXIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman of the Committee of the

Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without

intervening business, provided that the minimum time for

electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall

be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill
3

•HRES 510 EH

for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill,

as amended, to the House with such further amendments as

may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to

final passage without intervening motion except one motion

to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit No. 99.1

TRUSTEE STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

I, David
J. Kolibachuk, acting on behalf of U.S. Bank Trust National Association (the Trustee), hereby certify that the Trustee has fulfilled its obligations as trustee under the trust agreement, dated May 20, 2004, between Corporate Asset
Backed Corporation, as depositor, and the Trustee, with respect to the CABCO Series 2004-101 Trust (Goldman Sachs Capital I) during the period from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013.

Date: February 27, 2014



U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee ofCABCO Series 2004-101 Trust (Goldman Sachs Capital I)By:

/s/ David J. KolibachukName: David J. KolibachukTitle: Vice President
===============================================================================================================================================
File Path:
AN_Extractor.exe
SHA2 512 bit Hash Summary:
F97107F6-5E2F75E5-A21A70C0-1C9615BD-E904D2FA-ED14A1C7-8B96A87F-BCC90395-DFE1C1DB-0D3693CA-33CD86E2-56E3A870-91D6D6F6-AE2F1E23-1D6E016A-DFA7CB4F
===============================================================================================================================================

===============================================================================================================================================
File Path:
GOV.CSD.ITL.NIST.Library.dll
SHA2 512 bit Hash Summary:
54B82776-678690D8-3B8A81A1-E005BDED-88FFF1A1-2D44E3F7-FCED2B71-F04A5BB7-2637924B-9B64142F-C59ED6F5-5E1A901E-93BA448E-941EAFB9-45A376D7-018187FA
===============================================================================================================================================

===============================================================================================================================================
File Path:
GOV.CSD.ITL.NIST.Library_AN.dll
SHA2 512 bit Hash Summary:
66B659FA-20F70914-22859A4D-65638127-7DE35E2D-6E4786D3-63DE4B39-3A7D3C23-B4AF49E7-858197EC-9AACA4AC-378D54F5-AAEFDB30-FEBE022A-437EDD00-3A86BC06
===============================================================================================================================================