alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
 
 I, Chien Chih Liu hereby certify that:
 
 (1)  I have reviewed this annual report of Rotoblock Corporation;
 
 (2)  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 (3)  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Rotoblock Corporation as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 (4)  Rotoblock Corporation's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for Rotoblock Corporation:
 
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Rotoblock Corporation, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
   
 (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of Rotoblock Corporation's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in Rotoblock Corporation's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during Rotoblock Corporation's most recent fiscal quarter (Rotoblock Corporation's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Rotoblock Corporation's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 (5)  Rotoblock Corporation's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Rotoblock Corporation's auditors and the audit committee of Rotoblock Corporation's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Rotoblock Corporation's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Rotoblock Corporation's internal control over financial reporting.
  
 Dated:  July 29, 2010
  ROTOBLOCK CORPORATION
  /s/ Chien Chih Liu
 : Chien Chih Liu, Chief Executive Officer
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

Ouyeinc Ltd., 

Plaintiff, 

CASE NO.: 1:20-cv-3591 

vs. 

NaturalRays-Official and et al., 

Defendants. 

____________________________________/ 

MOTION TO WITHDRAWAL AS COUNSEL 

Pursuant to Local Rule 83.17 of the United States District Court Northern District of 

Illinois, ROLAND POTTS, ESQ., previously with the law firm of Diaz, Reus & Targ, LLP and 

currently with the law firm of Foley & Lardner LLP, moves to withdraw as counsel for Defendants, 

SanShi, and WX Fashion, and in support thereof states as follows: 

1. Mr. Potts and the law firm of Diaz Reus & Targ, LLP were retained by the 

Defendants to represent them in this matter. 

2. Mr. Potts has since left Diaz, Reus & Targ, LLP to join Foley & Lardner LLP. 

3. As a result of the above, and not to prejudice the Parties in this action, Roland Potts, 

Esq. respectfully moves for permission to withdraw as counsel for Defendants. 

4. Diaz, Reus & Targ, LLP advised Defendants of the departure of Mr. Potts from 

Diaz, Reus & Targ, LLP. 

5. Upon Mr. Potts’s withdrawal, Defendants will still have counsel of record in this 

matter. Defendants can continue to be reached through its counsel, Diaz, Reus & Targ, LLP at 

Case: 1:20-cv-03591 Document #: 109 Filed: 01/13/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:501
2 

100 Southeast Second Street, 3400 Miami Tower, Miami, FL 33131, which attorneys shall remain 

counsel of record. 

6. Accordingly, no party will be prejudiced by the Court’s granting of this Motion to 

Withdraw. 

WHEREFORE, Mr. Potts requests the Court enter an Order to Withdraw as counsel. 

DATED on this 13th day of January, 2022. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Roland Potts 

Roland Potts, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 87072 

Primary Email: RPotts@foley.com

Secondary Email: HMoreno@foley.com

Foley & Lardner LLP 

One Biscayne Tower 

2 South Biscayne Blvd. 

Suite 1900 

Miami, FL 33131 

Telephone: 305.482.8400 

Facsimile: 305.482.8600 

Case: 1:20-cv-03591 Document #: 109 Filed: 01/13/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:502
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on January 13, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF, which will send a notice via email to all 

counsel of record. 

/s/ Roland Potts 

Roland Potts, Esq. 

Florida Bar No. 87072 

Primary Email: RPotts@foley.com

Secondary Email: HMoreno@foley.com

Foley & Lardner LLP 

One Biscayne Tower 

2 South Biscayne Blvd. 

Suite 1900 

Miami, FL 33131 

Telephone: 305.482.8400 

Facsimile: 305.482.8600 

Case: 1:20-cv-03591 Document #: 109 Filed: 01/13/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:503
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 439

Concerning India’s recent detonation of 5 nuclear devices.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 14, 1998

Mr. UNDERWOOD submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Concerning India’s recent detonation of 5 nuclear devices.

Whereas the Hindu Nationalist (BJP) Government led by

Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee is just 7 weeks old;

Whereas India announced, and it was confirmed by seismic

detection devices, that India detonated 3 nuclear devices

on Monday May 11, 1998, at the Pokaran test site in

North Western India and detonated 2 devices on Wednesday, May 13, 1998, in the Thar desert in North Western

India;

Whereas India claims that 1 of the devices was a thermonuclear device, otherwise known as a hydrogen bomb;

Whereas this is the second time India has performed nuclear

testing;

Whereas the first ever test conducted in India occurred on

May 15, 1974;
2

•HRES 439 IH

Whereas India claims that this recent test was much more

powerful than its first 2 decades ago;

Whereas the Government of India has not renounced any further testing of nuclear devices, despite world-wide condemnation of her actions;

Whereas the provocative nature of this test may create a regional arms race between India and Pakistan;

Whereas nuclear testing is not conducive to the establishment

of peace and stability in South Asia;

Whereas nuclear tests are in direct defiance of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty endorsed in 1996 by no less

than 149 nations;

Whereas, despite the fact that India is not a signatory of the

treaty, India’s tests run counter to an international effort

to promulgate a comprehensive ban on nuclear weapons

testing;

Whereas, ironically, India’s founding Prime Minister

Jawaharlal Nehru first proposed the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty;

Whereas the recent nuclear tests make India’s development

of missile technology all the more ominous; and

Whereas missile systems such as India’s Agni and Prithvi

have ranges in excess of 1,400 miles, capable of reaching

15 nations: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) despite the long history of friendship be3 tween the United States and India, is deeply trou4 bled by India’s recent reckless behavior and its un-
3

•HRES 439 IH

1 willingness to sign on to the Comprehensive Test

2 Ban Treaty and the Non-Proliferation Treaty;

3 (2) strongly urges Pakistan to exercise restraint

4 and resist the temptation to prepare for nuclear

5 weapons testing of its own for the sake of greater

6 peace and stability in South Asia; and

7 (3) supports the economic sanctions imposed on

8 India by the President under the authority of the

9 Nuclear Proliferation Prevention Act of 1994.

Æ
IV

House Calendar No. 130

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 309

[Report No. 105–386]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2621) to extend trade authorities

procedures with respect to reciprocal trade agreements, and for other

purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 6, 1997

Mr. DREIER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2621) to extend

trade authorities procedures with respect to reciprocal

trade agreements, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2621) to

4 extend trade authorities procedures with respect to recip5 rocal trade agreements, and for other purposes. The bill

6 shall be considered as read for amendment. The amend7 ment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the
2

HRES 309 RH

1 Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill,

2 modified by the amendments printed in the report of the

3 Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall

4 be considered as adopted. All points of order against the

5 bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall

6 be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final

7 passage without intervening motion except: (1) Two hours

8 of debate on the bill, as amended, which shall be equally

9 divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking mi10 nority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; and

11 (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

House Calendar No. 130

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 309

[Report No. 105–386]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2621)

other purposes.spect to reciprocal trade agreements, and forto extend trade authorities procedures with reNOVEMBER 6, 1997

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
EXHIBIT 32.1: Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1850 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of South Texas Oil Company (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for  the  period  ending  December  31, 2005 as  filed  with the
Securities and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"),  I,
Murray N. Conradie, Chief  Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section   1350,  as  adopted
pursuant  to   Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and  that to the
best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                         /s/ Murray N. Conradie
                         -------------------------------------------
                         MURRAY N. CONRADIE, Chief Executive Officer
				and Principal Financial Officer

Dated: March 31, 2006
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of XFormity Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), we, Mark Haugejorde, President of the Company, and Jack Rabin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Mark Haugejorde                           Mark Haugejorde, President and CEO
November 22, 2004

/s/ Jack Rabin                                    Jack Rabin, Chief Financial Officer
November 22, 2004
ILND 450 (Rev. 10/13) Judgment in a Civil Action

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

J&L Pack, Inc et al,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

Nova Casualty Company,

Defendant(s).

Case No. 1:20-cv-03389

Judge Thomas M. Durkin 

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Judgment is hereby entered (check appropriate box):

in favor of plaintiff(s)

and against defendant(s)

in the amount of $ ,

which includes pre–judgment interest. 

does not include pre–judgment interest.

Post-judgment interest accrues on that amount at the rate provided by law from the date of this judgment. 

Plaintiff(s) shall recover costs from defendant(s).

in favor of defendant(s) 

and against plaintiff(s)

.

Defendant(s) shall recover costs from plaintiff(s).

other: Nova's motion for summary judgment is granted and Plaintiffs' partial motion is denied. 

Because the Virus Exclusion bars coverage, all four counts in Plaintiffs' complaint are dismissed.

This action was (check one):

tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. 

tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision was reached. 

decided by Judge Thomas M. Durkin on a motion for summary judgment.

Date: 8/11/2021 Thomas G. Bruton, Clerk of Court

E. Wall, Deputy Clerk

Case: 1:20-cv-03389 Document #: 49 Filed: 08/11/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2285
#### STATE v. BOYD

No. 76P97

Case below: 124 N.C.App. 230

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 June 1997.
#### John B. MARTEL, Claimant-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-7041.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: Oct. 27, 2004.

ORDER

Pursuant to the Court’s letter dated September 27, 2004,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

This appeal is dismissed.
IV

House Calendar No. 138

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 326

[Report No. 105–404]

Providing for an exception from the limitation of clause 6(d) of rule X

for the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 12, 1997

Mr. DREIER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for an exception from the limitation of clause

6(d) of rule X for the Committee on Government Reform

and Oversight.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight may

3 have not more than eight subcommittees for the duration

4 of the One Hundred Fifth Congress, notwithstanding

5 clause 6(d) of rule X.
House Calendar No. 138

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 326

[Report No. 105–404]

RESOLUTION

Providing for an exception from the limitation of

ernment Reform and Oversight.clause 6(d) of rule X for the Committee on GovNOVEMBER 12, 1997

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
Exhibit 10.12-Letter agreement dtd December 16, 2003 between Registrant and George Kreigler



Exhibit 10.12


Quantumtm


	
                                                                                                    

	
John Gannon

 President & Chief Operating Officer

 Quantum Corporation

 4001 Discovery Drive, Suite #1100

 Boulder, Colorado 80303

 Telephone: 720-406-5590

 John.Gannon@quantum.com

 www.quantum.com


	
 

	
 


		
December 16, 2003





 


To:  George Kreigler


From:  John Gannon

 


Dear George,


I am pleased that you have accepted the opportunity to lead Quantum’s Storage Systems organization as the General Manager.


I realize the leadership challenges that this new role presents and am completely confidant that you are capable of driving the organizational change and achieving the results that will allow us to meet our strategic
goals.  I’ve already mentioned to you that you will be eligible for a performance bonus based on achieving specific quarterly results.  The details of that program will be specified in a separate communication.


In addition, as we discussed, if your position is eliminated within the next 18 months and a comparable job is not found within Quantum, or if you are discharged for any reason other than misconduct, or failure to perform
within that time period, Quantum will provide you with a severance package of up to 12 months salary upon your signature on Quantum’s “release of all claims” agreement.


To confirm this agreement, please sign one copy of this letter and return it to Barbara Barrett.


	
                                                                                                    

	
Sincerely,

 /s/ John Gannon


John Gannon

 President & Chief Operating Officer


	
 

	
	
 

	
 





I understand and accept the terms of this agreement


Signed:  /s/ George Kreigler                          

 Dated:  
12/16/03
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I,
Scott M. Colosi, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Texas Roadhouse, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: February 27, 2009

By:

/s/ SCOTT M. COLOSI Scott M. Colosi
Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
#### Lonnelle A. LANGLEY, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 04-7333.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 2004.

Decided Dec. 22, 2004.

Lonnelle A. Langley, Appellant pro se. Josephine Frances Whalen, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Lonelle Langley seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Langley has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*