alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                         5
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1,000
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            APR-04-1998
<CASH>                                          340
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                10,797
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                  28,505
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             44,265
<PP&E>                                       23,175
<DEPRECIATION>                                3,927
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              173,257
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        21,545
<BONDS>                                     121,569
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   18,623
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                173,257
<SALES>                                      38,398
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             38,398
<CGS>                                        23,473
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                35,632
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            3,235
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (469)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (233)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (236)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (236)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0
        




</TABLE>
Case: 1:20-cr-00299 Document #: 25-1 Filed: 07/13/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:99
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of United PanAm Financial Corp. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ray Thousand, certify in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (a) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto signed this Certification as of November 8, 2006.



/s/    RAY THOUSANDRay ThousandChief Executive Officer and President
IV

House Calendar No. 49

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 165

[Report No. 105–128]

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to consideration

of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 11, 1997

Mr. GOSS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect

to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the

Committee on Rules.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 4(b) of rule

2 XI for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported before June 14, 1997, providing for consideration

6 of a bill introduced by the chairman of the Committee on

7 Appropriations that includes provisions making supple-
2

HRES 165 RH

1 mental appropriations for the fiscal year ending Septem2 ber 30, 1997.

House Calendar No. 49

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 165

[Report No. 105–128]

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI

tions reported from the Committee on Rules.with respect to consideration of certain resoluJUNE 11, 1997

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
Report Out

June 10, 2016

Breakout Out Group:

Performance

June 9-10, 2016  National Institute of Standards and Technology  Gaithersburg, MD

Roadmapping Workshop:

Measurement Science for Polymer-Based 

Additive Manufacturing
2

Desired AM Capabilities/Technologies 

June 9-10, 2016  National Institute of Standards and Technology  Gaithersburg, MD

Roadmapping Workshop:

Measurement Science for Polymer-Based 

Additive Manufacturing

Breakout Group: 

Performance

• Final Product Quality

• reliable, repeatable outputs 

•Product Lifetime

• stability and reactivity

• Predictability 

• materials, process, product

• Multi-Material

• expand materials library 

• Multi-Functionality

• designed roles, synergy

• Design

• validated model -> tailoring

• Product Characteristics

• quality and customization 

• Medical Applications

• speed, cleaning, validation 
3

Top-Voted Challenges/Priority Topics

June 9-10, 2016  National Institute of Standards and Technology  Gaithersburg, MD

Roadmapping Workshop:

Measurement Science for Polymer-Based 

Additive Manufacturing

Breakout Group: 

Performance

• Understanding and Modeling AM Processes

• Lack of Information on Stock Materials and Standards 

• Understanding Variable and Parameter Impacts on Part Properties

• Transparency in Polymer Additive Manufacturing 

• Development of Appropriate Safety Standards
EAC/NIST Accessible Voting Technology Research Workshop

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)

Portrait Room

April 1-2, 2013

Day 1

10:00 AM – 10:30 AM Welcome & Overview

 Charles Romine, Information Technology Lab (ITL) Director, NIST

 Pat Leahy, Senior Advisor, EAC

10:30 AM – 12:00 PM Accessibility Research and Elections: Where are we now?

Session Facilitator: Sharon Laskowski (NIST)

 Whitney Quesenbery – WQusability

 Mark Harniss & Deb Cook – University of Washington

 Doug Kruse & Lisa Schur – Rutgers University

 Juan Gilbert – Clemson University

12:00 PM – 12:15 PM Break

12:15 PM – 1:15 PM Accessibility Experiences and Challenges During Elections

Session Facilitator: Alice Miller (EAC)

 Don DeFord – Oregon Secretary of State Office

 Paul Herrnson – University of Maryland

 Terry Wagoner – Virginia State Board of Elections

 Christine Rzeszut – Montgomery County, MD Board of Elections

 Jim Dickson – National Council on Independent Living

 Doug Lewis – Election Center

1:15 PM – 2:00 PM Lunch (cafeteria – not included in registration)
2:00 PM – 3:00 PM Technology Transfer & Voting System Manufacturers’ Accessibility 

Experiences and Challenges

Session Facilitator: John Wack (NIST)

 Larry Korb – Dominion

 Nick Coudsy – Everyone Counts

 Shari Little – ES&S

 Henry Wixon – Chief Counsel for NIST (10 minute presentation)

3:00 PM – 3:10 PM

(10 minutes)

Break

3:10 PM – 4:10 PM

(1 hour)

Posters & Demos Madness

(1-2 minutes per poster/demo)

Session Facilitator: Shaneé Dawkins (NIST)

4:10 PM – 6:00 PM

(1 hour, 50 minutes)

Poster & Demo Session

Day 2

9:00 AM – 10:15 AM Designing for People with Cognitive Disabilities & Low Literacy

Session Facilitator: Jon Allen Sanford (Georgia Institute of Technology)

 Lynne Tamor – Center for Accessible Information

 Kathryn Summers – University of Baltimore

 Linda Harley – Georgia Tech Research Institute

 Dan Gillette – representing University of California, Berkeley

10:15 AM – 10:30 AM Break

10:30 AM – 12:30 PM Ballot Design and the Emergence of Mobile Devices

Session Facilitator: Whitney Quesenbery (WQusability)

 Drew Davies – Oxide Design Co.

 Jon Allen Sanford – Georgia Institute of Technology

 Sarah Swierenga – Michigan State University

 John Schmitt – Five Cedars Group, Inc.

12:30 PM – 1:30 PM Lunch (cafeteria – not included in registration)
1:30 PM – 2:30 PM Accessible Voting Interfaces and Technologies

Session Facilitator: Linda Harley (Georgia Tech Research Institute)

 Steven Booth – National Federation of the Blind

 Sarah Swierenga – Michigan State University

 Dan Gillette – Carnegie Mellon University – Silicon Valley Campus

 Chris Crawford – Clemson University

2:30 PM – 2:45 PM Break

2:45 PM – 4:00 PM Usability and Accessibility Testing

Session Facilitator: Dana Chisnell (Usability Works)

4:00 PM – 4:30 PM Open Discussion & Wrap up

Session Facilitator: Sharon Laskowski (NIST)
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 381 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 381

    Expressing the sense of the Congress that the President should 
renegotiate the extradition treaty with Mexico so that the possibility 
of capital punishment will not interfere with the timely extradition of 
          criminal suspects from Mexico to the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 1998

 Mr. Miller of Florida (for himself, Mrs. Thurman, Mr. Traficant, Mr. 
  Bliley, Mr. Canady of Florida, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Frost, Mr. Burton of 
  Indiana, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Solomon, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. English of 
Pennsylvania, Mrs. Fowler, Mr. Weldon of Florida, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. 
   Bilirakis, Mr. Mica, Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mr. Royce, and Mrs. 
 Myrick) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing the sense of the Congress that the President should 
renegotiate the extradition treaty with Mexico so that the possibility 
of capital punishment will not interfere with the timely extradition of 
          criminal suspects from Mexico to the United States.

Whereas under the Extradition Treaty Between the United States of America and 
        the United Mexican States, Mexico refused to extradite murder suspect 
        and U.S. citizen Jose Luis Del Toro to the United States until the State 
        of Florida agreed not to exercise its right to seek capital punishment 
        in its criminal prosecution of him;
Whereas under the Extradition Treaty Mexico has refused to extradite other 
        suspects of capital crimes; and
Whereas the Extradition Treaty interferes with the justice system of the United 
        States and encourages criminals to flee to Mexico: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the President should renegotiate the Extradition Treaty Between the 
United States of America and the United Mexican States, signed in 
Mexico City in 1978 (31 U.S.T. 5059), so that the possibility of 
capital punishment will not interfere with the timely extradition of 
criminal suspects from Mexico to the United States.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**RULE 15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Brian E. Johnson, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pliant Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 12, 2003
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 03, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 03, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20D0256. IN THE INTEREST OF A. B. et al., CHILDREN (MOTHER).

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Juvenile Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

18JV1320 18JV1321 18JV1322
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2873 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.2873

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
  To extend the authority of the United States District Court for the 
    Southern District of Iowa to hold court in Rock Island, Illinois.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. HOLDING OF COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA.
    Section 11029 of the 21st Century Department of Justice 
Appropriations Authorization Act (28 U.S.C. 95 note; Public Law 107-
273; 116 Stat. 1836) is amended by striking ``July 1, 2005'' and 
inserting ``July 1, 2006''.
SEC. 2. HOLDING OF COURT AT CLEVELAND, MISSISSIPPI.
    Section 104(a)(3) of title 28, United States Code, is amended in 
the second sentence by inserting ``and Cleveland'' after 
``Clarksdale''.
SEC. 3. PLACE OF HOLDING COURT IN TEXARKANA, TEXAS, AND TEXARKANA, 
ARKANSAS.
    Sections 83(b)(1) and 124(c)(5) of title 28, United States Code, 
are each amended by inserting after ``held at Texarkana'' the 
following: ``, and may be held anywhere within the Federal courthouse 
in Texarkana that is located astride the State line between Texas and 
Arkansas''.
SEC. 4. PLACE OF HOLDING COURT IN THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.
    Section 112(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``and Watertown'' and inserting ``Watertown, and 
Plattsburgh''.
SEC. 5. PLACE OF HOLDING COURT IN THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO.
    Section 85 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting 
``Colorado Springs,'' after ``Boulder,''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GE Financial Assurance Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael D. Fraizer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ Michael D. Fraizer
-----------------------
Michael D. Fraizer
Chief Executive Officer
July 31, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 330 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     November 13, 1997.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2267) making 
appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the 
Judiciary, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1998, 
and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and 
against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered 
as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
NICE Community Coordinating Council

Meeting Agenda

January 27, 2021 | 3:30-5:00 p.m. ET

BlueJeans: https://primetime.bluejeans.com/a2m/live-event/dpqyhydw

Phone: +1 (415) 466-7000 (U.S.) PIN 1675270 # or +1 (760) 699-0393 (U.S.) PIN 7500851098 #

I. Introduction and Ground Rules – Susi Barraza, NICE Program Manager

II. Opening Remarks

a. Industry Co-Chair - Jon Brickey, Senior Vice President, Mastercard

b. Government Co-Chair - Rodney Petersen, Director of NICE

III. Standing Items

a. Strategy Stories - New Developments that Align to NICE Strategic Plan

Talent Attraction Strategies

Presented by Drew Repp, Content Manager, Community Insights, Emsi

URL:

https://www.economicmodeling.com/2020/08/07/build-dont-buy-solving-the-cy

bersecurity-talent-shortage/

b. Report Roundup - Learning from Good Ideas

White Paper: Planning for the Future Through Workforce Development

Presented by Gabriela Montes de Oca, Cybersecurity Program Officer,

Organization of American States

URL:

http://www.oas.org/es/sms/cicte/docs/White-Paper-Cybersecurity-Education.pd

f

c. Framework Feature - Applications and Uses of Workforce Framework for

Cybersecurity

Update on the Federal Cybersecurity Workforce Coding Effort

Presented by Jodi Guss, Human Capital Strategist, Office of Personnel

Management

IV. Working Group Updates

a. Promote Career Discovery

James Baker, Account Coordinator, California Cybersecurity Institute; or Roland

Varriale II, Cybersecurity Analyst, Argonne National Laboratory
b. Transform Learning Process

Dr. Aurelia T. Williams, Interim Vice Provost for Academic Administration, Norfolk

State University

c. Modernize Talent Management

Karen Jensen, Saaby Consulting; or Kevin Perry, Chief Cyber Training, DoD Cyber

Crime Center/Cyber Training Academy; or Melissa Woo, Executive Vice President

for Administration, Michigan State University

V. Community of Interest Updates

a. Apprenticeships in Cybersecurity

Tony Bryan, Executive Director, CyberUp; or Jennifer Oddo Executive Director,

Strategic Workforce Education and Innovation, Youngstown State University

b. Cybersecurity Skills Competitions

Amelia Phillips, Highline College

c. K12 Cybersecurity Educators

Terrance Campbell, CCTE Cybersecurity Teacher, Shelby County Schools; or Laurin

Buchanan, Secure Decisions; or Patrick Schultz, Director of Technology

Integration, National Business Professionals of America

VI. Project Progress Reports

a. NICE Conference and Expo

Presenter: Randy Pestana, Florida International University

URL: https://niceconference.org/

b. NICE K12 Cybersecurity Education Conference

Presenter: Felicia Rateliff, Director of Operations & Programs, iKeepSafe

URL: https://www.k12cybersecurityconference.org/

c. Centers of Academic Excellence (CAE) in Cybersecurity Community

Presenter: Tony Coulson, California State University, San Bernardino

URL: https://www.caecommunity.org/

VII. Closing Remarks and Next Meeting Reminder

Academic Co-Chair - Marni Baker-Stein, Chief Academic Officer and Provost,

Western Governors University

Next NICE Community Meeting: Wednesday, February 24, 2021, at 3:30 p.m. ET
| ***NCB*****National Cooperative Bark www.ncb.com**March 14, 2005 LaSalle - Asset Backed Securities Trust Group 135 South LaSalle Street, Suite 1635 Chicago, IL 60603 RE:   Annual Statement as to Compliance MSDW Series 2004-IQ7 Dear Sir/Madam: In accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement herewith is the Officer's Certificate. a.  A review of the activities of the Special Servicer during the preceding calendar year and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision. b.  To the best of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all obligations under this agreement in all material respects throughout the year. Sincerely, /s/ Matthew Wehland Matthew Wehland Vice President NCB |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|