alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NI

NATI O NAL I N

CEI T IATIVE F OR 

CYBERSECURITY EDUCATION

nist.gov/nice

Advanced Technological 

Education Program

The National Science Foundation’s Advanced Technological Education (ATE) program provides grants that support the development of innovative approaches for educating highly skilled technicians for the industries 

that drive the nation’s economy. In tandem with creating products to improve students’ learning, many ATE 

grantees offer professional development for faculty. The ATE program funds large, comprehensive Centers of 

Excellence, as well as smaller-scale, more focused projects. Each ATE Center generally involves a collaboration 

among several educational institutions, along with partners from business, industry, and government, all of 

which work together to improve education and build the workforce in a particular area of technology. 

ATE CENTERS FOR CYBERSECURITY EDUCATION

Advanced Cyberforensics Education Consortium cyberace.org

Daytona State College (Daytona Beach, FL)

This consortium develops and disseminates cyberforensics curricula, provides professional development for faculty members, and creates interest in cybersecurity among high school students. 

Center for Systems Security and Information Assurance cssia.org

Moraine Valley Community College (Palos Hills, IL)

This resource center provides faculty development and a cutting-edge virtual teaching and learning 

environment that has been adopted by several hundred educational institutions and is also used 

extensively for cybersecurity student competitions. 

Cyber Security Education Consortium cseconline.net/2014

University of Tulsa (Tulsa, OK) 

This regional center involves over 40 two-year academic institutions in eight states. Faculty members 

offer courses based on CSEC’s core information assurance and forensics curriculum. Particular 

emphases are automation and control systems security and mobile-device security. 

CyberWatch West cyberwatchwest.org

Whatcom Community College (Bellingham, WA)

This regional center focuses on cybersecurity education and workforce development in 14 Western 

states. Activities include providing model curricula, offering workshops for faculty, facilitating student 

participation in intercollegiate cyber defense competitions, and mentoring community colleges that 

aim to achieve designation as a National Center of Academic Excellence in Cyber Defense–2-Year 

Education (CAE-2Y). 

National CyberWatch Center nationalcyberwatch.org

Prince George’s Community College (Largo, MD)

This national center cultivates collaborations for initiatives that include developing and updating 

cybersecurity degree and certificate programs; mapping curricula to federal and industry knowledgeand-skill standards, job roles, and professional certifications; and creating model transfer pathways 

that allow students to move between two-year and four-year degree programs. 

CSEC

EDUCATION CONSORTIUM

CYBER SECURITY
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

CHRISTIAN DIOR COUTURE, S.A., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

FANSOMALL.COM, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 20-cv-3024 

Judge Martha M. Pacold 

Magistrate Judge Beth W. Jantz

NOTICE OF FILING 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff, by its counsel, has filed Plaintiff’s Motion for 

Entry of a Preliminary Injunction. Pursuant to Fourth Amended General Order 20-0012, 

Plaintiff has not noticed the Motion for a hearing, but Plaintiff is available for a telephonic 

hearing if requested by the Court. 

Dated this 29th day of June 2020. Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Justin R. Gaudio______ 

Amy C. Ziegler 

Justin R. Gaudio 

Allyson M. Martin 

 Abby M. Neu 

 Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. 

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

312.360.0080 

312.360.9315 (facsimile) 

aziegler@gbc.law 

jgaudio@gbc.law 

amartin@gbc.law 

aneu@gbc.law 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Christian Dior Couture, S.A.
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 29th day of June 2020, I will electronically file the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, I will electronically publish the 

documents on a website to which the Domain Names that have been transferred to Dior’s control 

now redirect, and I will send an e-mail to the e-mail addresses identified in Exhibits 5 and 6 to 

the Declaration of Nicolas Lambert and any e-mail addresses provided for Defendants by third 

parties that includes a link to said website. 

/s/ Justin R. Gaudio_____________ 

Amy C. Ziegler 

Justin R. Gaudio 

Allyson M. Martin 

 Abby M. Neu 

 Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. 

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

312.360.0080 

312.360.9315 (facsimile) 

aziegler@gbc.law 

jgaudio@gbc.law 

amartin@gbc.law 

aneu@gbc.law 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Christian Dior Couture, S.A.
insufficient evidence was presented at trial). The district court concluded

that the State presented insufficient evidence to support the child abuse and child neglect charges and granted Fredrica's motion as to those
counts. The State contends that the district court erred. We review the evidence presented in the light most favorable to the prosecution to determine whether "any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt." 

### Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979); 

### Mitchell v. State, 124 Nev. 807, 816, 192 P.3d 721, 727 (2008). The State asserts that the district court • disregarded the overwhelming evidence which established that P.B. and N.B. were not given proper "care, control, or supervision." 

### See NRS 200.508(1)-(2) (requiring the State to demonstrate that a person caused or allowed a child to be placed in a situation where he might suffer injury as the result of "abuse or neglect"); NRS 200.508(4)(a) (defining "abuse and neglect," in relevant part, as maltreatment); NRS 432B.140 (explaining that maltreatment occurs where "a child has been abandoned, is without proper care, control and supervision or lacks the subsistence, education, shelter, medical care or other care necessary for the well-being of the child"). Specifically, the State points to testimony which established that (a) Fredrica used chemicals to grow marijuana and kept liquid containers next to electrical wiring, (b) many marijuana grow houses develop mold, fire, and other hazards, and (c) protective gear is worn to remove marijuana. The State also points to testimony which established that Fredrica committed her crimes in P.B. and N.B.'s presence and forced them to participate in her activities. We agree with the district court that

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2

(0) 1947A 

### e

### Douglas J.

this evidence was insufficient to establish the essential elements of the charged crimes. We conclude that the district court did not err by granting Frederica's motion, in part, and we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

-- 

### Q 4 aCa ■ 

### ityafte....._, J. Parraguirre

cc: Hon. Carolyn Ellsworth, District Judge Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Cofer, Geller & Durham Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 

### 3

(01 1947A 

### e
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 328

Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 13, 1997

Mr. FAZIO submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating minority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Member be, and

2 he is hereby, elected to the following standing committee

3 of the House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS: Mr. Robert ‘‘Bud’’

5 Cramer of Alabama.

Æ
As of: 9/16/21 11:39 AM 

Received: September 15, 2021 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. ktl-zaak-9isk 

Comments Due: September 15, 2021 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: NIST-2021-0004 

Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework 

Comment On: NIST-2021-0004-0001 

Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework 

Document: NIST-2021-0004-DRAFT-0106 

Comment on FR Doc # 2021-1617 6 

Submitter Information 

Email: 

Organization: Telecommunications Technology Association(TTA) 

General Comment 

First of all, we thank you for all your time in checking this proposal and would like to introduce what we 

are doing for securing trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (AI). 

In recent years, the Ministry of Science and ICT of Korea have released the national strategy on 

"Realization of Trustworthy AI ('14.5.21)". As a next step for realizing that strategy, TTA has been 

assigned as the main performer in the part of developing the technical methodology for evaluating 

trustworthiness. Therefore, we have been developing the technical methodology including requirements 

for implementation oftrustworthy AI, detailed techniques for the requirement, and testing and evaluation 

methods for Verification and Validation (V & V) of requirements. 

As an identical objective, we found NIST is working on trustworthy AI. Thus, we have concluded that not 

only responding to the NIST RFI but also sharing our work and getting the feedback from professional 

research institutes have to be performed. In this regard, we would like to introduce our systematic 

approach on how we try to assure trustworthiness of AI technically and hope have meaningful discussion 

about this 

Please have a look at it and If you have questions feel free to contact us. 

Attachments 

(Rev2) 210915_Response to NIST RFI
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of U.S. Premium Beef, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-K for the periodended August 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the Report), I, Steven D. Hunt, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

|   |   |                                                  |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
| By:    |   |  /s/ Steven D. Hunt                              |
|   |   |  Steven D. Hunt

* Chief Executive Officer* |

 

Date: November24, 2008
H. Res. 326

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 13, 1997.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution the

Committee on Government Reform and Oversight may have

not more eight subcommittees for the duration of the One

Hundred Fifth Congress, notwithstanding clause 6(d) of rule

X.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 31.2
 
 CERTIFICATIONS
 
 I, Hillard C. Gardner, certify that:
 
 1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cavalry Bancorp, Inc.;
 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 4) The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15-d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5) The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors:
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: August 5, 2004
byHillard C. GardnerSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLNMP00000 L13110000.PP0000 15XL1109PF]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Public Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act and the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) Pecos District Resource Advisory Council's (RAC) Lesser Prairie-Chicken (LPC) Habitat Preservation Area of Critical Environmental Concerns (ACEC) Livestock Grazing Subcommittee will meet as indicated below.

# DATES:

The LPC ACEC Subcommittee will meet on December 11, 2014, at 1:00 p.m. in the Roswell Field Office, 2909 West Second Street, Roswell, NM 88201. The public may send written comments to the Subcommittee at the BLM Pecos District Office, 2909 West 2nd Street, Roswell, New Mexico, 88201.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Adam Ortega, Range Management Specialist, Roswell Field Office, Bureau of Land Management, 2909 West 2nd Street, Roswell, New Mexico 88201, 575-627-0204. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8229 to contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal business hours.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The 10-member Pecos District RAC elected to create a subcommittee to advise the Secretary of the Interior, through the BLM, about possible livestock grazing within the LPC ACEC. The planned                           ( print page 68296)                        agenda includes a discussion of prescribed burning within the ACEC.                

Michael H. Tupper,

Deputy State Director, Lands and Resources.

[FR Doc. 2014-27016 Filed 11-13-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-FB-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00764-CV

Ronald GUTIERREZ Individually, R.G.&C. Automotive, Inc., and G&C Total Care, Inc.,

Appellants

v.

Joceline NOLLKAMPER,

Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CI-13097

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 23, 2014

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

A filing fee of $195.00 was due from appellants when this appeal was filed but was not 

paid. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.941(a) (West 2013); id. §§ 51.0051, 51.207(b)(1), 51.208 

(West 2013); TEXAS SUPREME COURT ORDER REGARDING FEES CHARGED IN CIVIL CASES IN THE 

SUPREME COURT, IN CIVIL CASES IN THE COURTS OF APPEALS, AND BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL 

ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION (Misc. Docket No. 13-9127, Aug. 16, 2013). The clerk of the court 

notified appellants of this deficiency in a letter dated October 31, 2014, and stated the fee must be 
04-14-00764-CV

remitted no later than November 14, 2014. The fee was not paid. Rule 5 of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure provides:

A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay —

at the time an item is presented for filing — whatever fees are required by statute 

or Supreme Court order. The appellate court may enforce this rule by any order 

that is just.

TEX. R. APP. P. 5. 

Accordingly, on November 25, 2014, this court ordered appellants to either (1) pay the 

applicable filing fee or (2) provide written proof to this court that they are excused by statute or 

the Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying the fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1 (providing that 

indigent party who complies with provisions of that rule may proceed without advance payment 

of costs). Our order informed appellants that if they failed to provide such written proof within 

the time ordered, this appeal would be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Appellants have not 

responded. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Costs of appeal are assessed against appellants.

PER CURIAM

- 2 -
Exhibit B

Case: 1:20-cv-02753 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 05/06/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:86
March 4, 2020

Via Electronic Mail (tmfortner@lkqcorp.com)

Terry Fortner

LKQ Corporation

500 West Madison Street

Suite 2800

Chicago, IL 60661

Re: Collision Parts Covered by GM’s Design Patents

Dear Terry:

According to General Motors (GM) https://www.genuinegmparts.com/collision-repair-faqs:

“Certain GM collision parts are protected by United States design patents. This means 

that unlicensed making, using, and/or selling of a protected part could constitute an 

infringement of a GM design patent. It’s important to know this because the use of non-OEM 

parts on newer Chevrolet, Buick, GMC, or Cadillac vehicles could constitute an infringement of 

a GM design patent.” A current list of GM Patented parts can be found on GM’s website 

https://www.genuinegmparts.com/src/pdf/Patented-Parts-list-for-GGMP-JAN2020.pdf

CCC respects intellectual property (“IP”) owner rights and expects suppliers 

participating in CCC parts to ensure their parts are not infringing on design patents. In 

comparing LKQ Corporation’s parts to GM’s patented parts, it appears your company is selling 

Aftermarket/Non-OEM parts that appear on GM’s patented parts list. Exhibit A identifies some 

examples of LKQ Corporation’s in-stock Aftermarket/Non-OEM parts where GM claims there 

are no licensees for their design patents. 

Please remove these parts and any other parts where applicable design patents have not 

been licensed from GM. Please implement corrective actions in your upstream supply chain 

processes to avoid offering parts that infringe on IP owner’s rights. If you feel your parts do not 

infringe on GM design patents, please provide specifics that can be shared with GM or contact 

General Motors directly.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely yours,

Joseph Allen

SVP & GM, Automotive Services

CCC Information Services

cc: Kevin J. Kane, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, CCC (via email) 

Robert Levels, Assistant General Counsel, CCC (via email)

Robert Jabjiniak, Vice President, CCC (via email)

Case: 1:20-cv-02753 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 05/06/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:87
March 4, 2020

Page 2

Exhibit A:

OEM_PART_NUM

Design 

Patent

Grant #

Supplier’s 

PART_STOCK_NUM

23470665 D786743 GM1036176

39117892 D824825 GM1230463

42554958 D812532 GM1230456C

84107966 D786743 GM1230456

84108166 D828261 GM1036176

84108166 D828261 GM1103203

84108166 D828261 GM1138104

84108167 D828261 GM1103203

84108167 D828261 GM1139104

84112271 D840285 GM1038243

84112272 D840285 GM1039243

84188294 D818903 GM1230465C

84388399 D818903 GM1230465C

84391966 D818903 GM1230465C

84431667 D803731 GM1200752

84507085 D818903 GM1230465C

Case: 1:20-cv-02753 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 05/06/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:88