alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON JANUARY 23, 20 02 Session WILLIAM HARWELL PERRY v. RI CKI C. CHILDS PERRY Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Tipton County No. 16, 505; The Honorable Martha Brasfield, Chancellor

No. W2001-01350-COA-R3-CV - Filed March 21, 2002

Ho ll y Ki rb y Lil la rd , J ., co nc ur ri ng se pa ra te ly. I concur with the maj ority opinion in t

his case , but write

separa tely to elabor ate on my reasoning regar

ding the issue raised in the partial dissent in this case. Tenness ee Code A

nnotated § 36-5-10 1(d)(2) providesas follow s: An award of reha bilitative , tempora

ry support a nd mainte nance sh all rema

in i n t he court’s control for the duration of such awar d, and may be inc

reased, decreased, terminated or e xtend ed, or otherwise modified, upon a showing of substantial and material change in circumstance

. Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-10 1(d)(2) (2001). T he dissen t applies t his statute to the case at bar, arguing that the statute would require the wife in this case to show a s ubstant ial and ma terial c hange

in circumstances in or der t

o rec eive cont inue d reh abilitativ e ali mony , eve n whe re th e awa rd is e xp ressly open-ended

and non- final. I

f this wer e true, h owever , the statu

te could arguably apply to a pendente lite award of alimony

as well. C learly

it would be anomalous to require a showing of a substantial and material change in circumstanc es to modify such an aw ard. One of the purposes of Section 36-5-101 (d)(2) is to establish that the trial court retains continuing control over an award of rehabilitative alimony. Such a provision is unnecessar y in the case of a non-fina

l order; i f the awa

rd is not final, the t

rial cou rt’s con tinuing c ontrol is a

pparent
. This indicate s that Sec tion 36-5- 101(d)( 2) is inten ded to apply only to a final award of rehabilitative al im on y, since sta

tutory authority could be n

ecessa ry to estab lish that s uch an award, altho ugh final, remains in the control of the trial court. Requiring a showing of substantial and mate rial cha nge to modify a final aw ard of rehabilitative alimony is appropriate. The dissent expresses concern about permitting a trial court to adopt a “ wait and see” approach in award ing reh abil i tative alimony. This concer n is justified, but on occasion such an approach is wa rran ted. See Robine tte v. Robi

nette , 726 S.W.2d 524 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986).Conside ring all of the circumst ances in this case , I do

not believe that the trial c ourt abus ed its discretion by entering

an order on reha

bilitative alimony that was non-final. For these reasons, I co nc ur se pa ra te ly.

HOL LY KI RBY LI LL ARD , J.
**Exhibit
      32.1**











**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of CompX International Inc. (the Company)
      on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) I, David A. Bowers,
      Vice
      Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and I, Darryl
      R.
      Halbert, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Controller of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/
      David A.
      Bowers





David
      A.
      Bowers


Vice
      Chairman of the Board, President


and
      Chief Executive Officer










/s/
      Darryl R.
      Halbert


Darryl
      R.
      Halbert


Vice
      President, Chief Financial Officer


and
      Controller











August
      2,
      2007











Note:  The
      certification the registrant furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed “filed” for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      or
      otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  Registration
      Statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference, except as otherwise expressly
      stated in such filing.
exv10w1



 






EXHIBIT 10.1




FIRST AMENDMENT TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”)
is entered into effective as of October 14, 2005, by and between CancerVax Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), and David F. Hale (“Executive”).



     WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend that certain Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement dated as of November 15, 2004, between the Company and Executive (the
“Original Agreement”), to to extend the term of such agreement.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the various covenants and agreements hereinafter set
forth, the parties hereto agree as follows:



     1. Amendment to Section 2. Section 2 of the Original Agreement is hereby restated in
its entirety to read as follows:



          “2. Employment Period. Subject to the provisions for earlier termination hereinafter
provided, Executive’s employment hereunder shall be for a term (the “Employment Period”)
commencing on the Effective Date and ending on October 22, 2008, or such longer period as Executive
and the Board shall otherwise mutually agree.”




     2. No Other Amendments. Except as expressly provided for in this Amendment, no other
term or provision of the Original Agreement is amended or modified in any respect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth
above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	CANCERVAX CORPORATION	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ William R. La Rue
 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	William R. La Rue	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Chief Financial Officer	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 





	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	/s/ David F. Hale	 	 
	 

	 	 

David F. Hale
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Now come all parties, by and through their attorneys, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 41, stipulate that all of Plaintiffs’ claims are dismissed with prejudice, with the 

respective parties to bear their own costs.

Respectfully submitted, 

1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), David Pekoske, Acting Secretary of 

the Department of Homeland Security, is substituted in place of Chad Wolf.

BLACK LIVES MATTER CHICAGO, 

et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

DAVID PEKOSKE, Acting Secretary of 

Department of Homeland Security, et al.

1

, 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 20 C 4319

Judge Pallmeyer

Case: 1:20-cv-04319 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/21/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:238
2

/s/ Theresa Kleinhaus

One of Plaintiffs’ Attorneys

Jon Loevy

Heather Lewis Donnell

Steve Art

Theresa Kleinhaus

Julia Rickert

Lindsay Hagy

Ruth Brown

Sean Starr

LOEVY & LOEVY

311 N. Aberdeen St.

Chicago, IL 60607

(312) 243-5900

Brendan Shiller

SHILLER PREYAR JARARD & SAMUELS

@ THE WESTSIDE JUSTICE CENTER

601 S. California Ave.

Chicago, IL 60612

(312) 226-4590

Sheila Bedi

COMMUNITY JUSTICE AND 

 CIVIL RIGHTS CLINIC

NORTHWESTERN PRITZKER 

 SCHOOL OF LAW

375 E. Chicago Ave.

Chicago, IL 60611

(312) 503-8576

Elizabeth Wang

LOEVY & LOEVY

2060 Broadway, Ste. 460

Boulder, CO 80302

(720) 328-5642

David B. Owens

LOEVY & LOEVY

100 S. King St., Ste. 100

Seattle, WA 98104

Joey L. Mogul

G. Flint Taylor

Brad J. Thomson

Christian Snow

Case: 1:20-cv-04319 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/21/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:239
3

PEOPLE’S LAW OFFICE

1180 N. Milwaukee Ave.

Chicago, IL 60642

(773) 235-0070

Craig B. Futterman

MANDEL LEGAL AID CLINIC

UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW 

 SCHOOL

6020 S. University

Chicago, IL 60637

(773) 702-9611

futterman@uchicago.edu

JOHN R. LAUSCH, Jr.

United States Attorney

By: s/ Kathleen M. Flannery

KATHLEEN M. FLANNERY

NIGEL B. COONEY

PATRICK W. JOHNSON

Assistant United States Attorneys

219 South Dearborn Street

Chicago, Illinois 60604

(312) 353-7223 

(312) 353-1996

(312) 353-5327

kathleen.flannery@usdoj.gov

nigel.cooney@usdoj.gov

patrick.johnson2@usdoj.gov

Case: 1:20-cv-04319 Document #: 25 Filed: 01/21/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:240
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

CAMELBAK PRODUCTS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”,

Defendants.

Civil Action No.: 1:20-cv-03952

Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey T. Gilbert

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby files this Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal, without prejudice, as to the following Defendant(s) identified on Schedule A of the 

Complaint:

NO. DEFENDANT

330 A bay E Store

305 queenation 

286 beautifu1 

295 guojunjhgIG 

287 Boutique520 

311 WildLion 

301 NANzhengca01264 

312 xiangtanhe 

291 dream zakka 

28 monsterlady 

45 xiannvhomeland

284 Ananssin 

288 chuanxiaosan89745 

293 Eucalyptusseed717 

294 fillup 

298 littlefairy520 

299 lovelyperson1807 

316 zongshixiaopu 

392 NICEMAN Store

272 tradingwelldo

Case: 1:20-cv-03952 Document #: 44 Filed: 10/12/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:9408
246 liangzhiwen361_7

264 sikenew

280 ymvon

314 YOOthON56

289 DancMonk

8 ezbuy111

9 hiteche

228 espaceship

265 sofastshop

275 us-enjoy

252 lycheejewelry

DATED: October 12, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt (Bar No. 6207971)

Keith Vogt, Ltd.

111 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1700

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Telephone: 312-675-6079

E-mail: keith@vogtip.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case: 1:20-cv-03952 Document #: 44 Filed: 10/12/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:9409
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document was electronically filed on October 12, 2020 with the Clerk of the Court using the 

CM/ECF system, which will automatically send an email notification of such filing to all registered 

attorneys of record.

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt

Case: 1:20-cv-03952 Document #: 44 Filed: 10/12/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:9410
Continuing Education Units

VERIFICATION OF ATTENDANCE FORM

Certification Number: ________________

 attended the following professional educational activity. 

(NAME)

Title: Federal Information Security Educators (FISSEA) Winter Forum

Date(s): February 14, 2023 CEU Hours Earned: 3 hrs 

Sponsor(s): National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 

Explanation of Event: The FISSEA Forums are quarterly meetings to provide opportunities for policy and programmatic 

updates, the exchange of best practices, and discussion and engagement among members of the Federal Information 

Security Educators (FISSEA) community. Webinar attendees will hear presentations from:

• Dr. Aunshul Rege, Associate Professor/ Director of the Cybersecurity in Application,

Research, and Education (CARE) Lab Temple University

• Dr. Stephanie Carter, Principal, Coalfire Systems

• Dr. Tania Peitzker, Adjunct Professor of Metaverses and Interfaces, University of Silicon Valley

• Christopher M. Schmigel, Vice President, M&T Bank

• Dr. Pranshu Bajpai, Principal Staff Security Architect, Motorola Solutions

Location: Virtual Webinar; www.nist.gov/fissea 

Name of Meeting Host: Rodney Petersen, Director of the National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE)

 

Contact Information:

nist.gov/nice 

nice@nist.gov

The Continuing Education Units form is provided as a courtesy. It is the responsibility of the 

attendee to complete and submit with their certifying authority.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Peter Stokes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Peter
      StokesPeter
      StokesChief
      Executive OfficerFebruary
      27, 2009




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

DEBORAH LAUFER, Individually, Case No.: 1:20-cv-04378

Plaintiff,

v.

SHAH HOSPITALITY, L.L.C., a 

Domestic Limited Liability Corporation,

Defendant.

___________________________ 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF CASE WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby dismisses the instant action with

prejudice.

FOR THE PLAINTIFF:

/s/ Amale Knox

Amale Knox, Of Counsel

Thomas B. Bacon, P.A.

330 Harrison St.

Pontiac, MI 48341

amale.knox.esq@gmail.com

Illinois Bar. Id. No. 6308622

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that September 23, 2020, I filed the foregoing using the Clerk of Court’s

CM/ECF efiling system, which will serve all counsel of record electronically.

/s/ Amale Knox

Attorney

Case: 1:20-cv-04378 Document #: 6 Filed: 09/23/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:25
#### Ernest HARBARGER, Claimant-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-7199.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 20, 2004.

ORDER

Pursuant to the Court’s letter dated September 23, 2004,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

This appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI 

WESTERN DIVISION 

K.C. HOPPS, LTD., ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 20-cv-00437-SRB 

 ) 

THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, ) 

INC., ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

ORDER 

 Before the Court is Defendant The Cincinnati Insurance Company’s (“Defendant”) 

Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. #8.) For the reasons set forth below, the motion is DENIED. 

 In this case, Plaintiff K.C. Hopps, Ltd. (“Plaintiff”) seeks insurance coverage related to 

COVID-19 under an all-risk property insurance policy it purchased from Defendant. On June 

22, 2020, Defendant filed the pending motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

12(b)(6). On July 22, 2020, this case was transferred from Judge Roseann Ketchmark to the 

undersigned. (Doc. #22.) 

 The undersigned is also presiding over a case captioned Studio 417, Inc., et al. v. The 

Cincinnati Insurance Company, Case No. 20-cv-03127-SRB. Studio 417 involves the same 

Defendant, similar insurance provisions, and similar factual allegations as those asserted in this 

case. Defendant also moved to dismiss Studio 417 under Rule 12(b)(6) based on similar legal 

arguments that it presents in this case. On August 12, 2020, the Court denied Defendant’s 

motion to dismiss in Studio 417. 

 For substantially the same reasons as those in the Studio 417 Order, the Court finds that 

Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant are adequately stated. Consequently, Defendant’s Motion to 
2 

Dismiss (Doc. #8) is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Stay 

Discovery pending a ruling on its Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #26) is DENIED AS MOOT. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 /s/ Stephen R. Bough 

 STEPHEN R. BOUGH 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: August 12, 2020
NCNR Status Update

04.05.2022 Photo credit: Brian Renegar
Recent Progress

Submitted documents and request 

to restart to NRC (10.01)

→ Responding to audit questions

Bulk debris cleanup completed 

Feb 6

External review complete

Feb 02
NRC Special Inspection Report Issued

NRC public meeting and report released on March 16th

“Observation” meeting in which attendees have an 

opportunity to observe the NRC performing its regulatory 

function or discussing regulatory issues. 

7 apparent violations

Next step: Alternative Dispute Resolution

Outcome: Final confirmatory order to NIST
What’s Next?

Filter primary coolant system (Apr)

Inspect/clean fuel elements (Apr)

All corrective actions funded

Restore reactor to operational readiness

NIST response to external review

NRC issues decision on restart request

Schedule user experiments cleanup

Filter elements received

March 11, 2022 - President signs FY2022 

omnibus spending bill. Official White House 

Photo by Adam Schultz
Restart Date

Restart = Technical Readiness & NRC Authorizes Restart

Technical Readiness

Assumptions:

• Primary filtering goes perfectly

• Fuel cleaning and qualification goes perfectly

Low power testing: mid-June

Neutron production: mid-July

NRC

Enforcement action process

Verify implementation of enforcement actions

License amendment approval

Complete required regulatory inspections
Uncertainties potentially affecting 2022 restart

Note: COVID continues to be a risk that could lead to delays in several of the items above

Risk item Probability Potential impact

Cleanup of reactor vessel and primary does not go as planned Medium High

Fuel elements cannot be reused Low High

Procedure revisions required for startup delayed Medium Low

Additional corrective actions from external review impacts restart Medium Medium

Thermal column survey impacts restart Medium Low

Insufficient funds to implement corrective actions Low High

Protracted license amendment disposition Medium

Low

Medium

NRC does not authorize restart

• Not satisfied with corrective actions

• Not satisfied with progress towards corrective actions

Medium High
Facility Upgrades and 2023 Outage

Major benefit to scientific community

NCNR down for 11 months starting in January 2023

Replace H2 cold source with new D2 source

Use cold neutrons for larger structures & slower motions

With D2 we will fully moderate thermal neutrons

~ 2x gain for all 20 guide hall instruments

Replace neutron guides 5, 6, & 7

30-year old 58Ni guide replaced with modern supermirror guides

~ 2x-10x gain in data rate

New instruments

NSF-funded Neutron Spin Echo 2 (2024, ~10x NSE data rate)

Cold Neutron 3-axis (2027, ~ 10x – 100x SPINS data rate)

On-going facility upgrades: https://www.nist.gov/ncnr/ncnr-facility-upgrades
CFTC Ex. 422

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 81-10 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1816
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 81-10 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 2 of 8 PageID #:1817
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 81-10 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 3 of 8 PageID #:1818
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 81-10 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 4 of 8 PageID #:1819
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 81-10 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 5 of 8 PageID #:1820
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 81-10 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 6 of 8 PageID #:1821
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 81-10 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 7 of 8 PageID #:1822
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 81-10 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 8 of 8 PageID #:1823
NVLAP ASSESSOR BULLETIN AB-9-2008 PAGE 1 OF 1 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Institute of Standards and Technology 

National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

ISSUE DATE:

July 8, 2008 

NUMBER: AB-9-2008 ASSESSOR BULLETIN

LAP: ECT 

SUBJECT: On-Site Assessment Report for ECT Laboratories 

The purpose of this bulletin is to define what forms are included in an ECT on-site assessment 

report and to announce the release of a new ECT program-specific checklist called “NIST 

Handbook 150-11 Checklist.” The NIST Handbook 150-11 Checklist corresponds to the 

management and technical requirements for accreditation set forth in the 2007 edition of NIST 

Handbook 150-11, NVLAP Electromagnetic Compatibility and Telecommunications Program. 

Assessors conducting initial or renewal on-site assessments for the ECT laboratory accreditation 

program shall submit the most current versions of the following documents as part of the on-site 

assessment report package to NVLAP within 14 business days of completion of the assessment: 

 1. NVLAP On-Site Assessment Summary 

 2. NVLAP On-Site Assessment Signature Sheet with Narrative Summary 

 3. Test Method Review Summary 

 4. NIST Handbook 150 Checklist 

 5. NIST Handbook 150-11 Checklist (ECT Program-Specific Checklist) - 

 6. NIST Hand book 150-11A (ECT: FCC Parts 2, 15, and 18), if applicable. 

This list supersedes and replaces any forms and checklists that may have been previously used. 

To ensure that the most recent versions of the on-site reporting forms and checklists are used, 

NVLAP posts these controlled documents on the Assessor Resources page of the NVLAP web 

site at <http://ts.nist.gov/standards/accreditation/assessor.cfm>. Most of these documents are 

either a Microsoft Word form that is locked, but enabled for data entry, or a PDF file that may be 

printed. For assistance with using electronic Word forms, please see “Tips for Working with 

Microsoft Word Forms” on the Assessor Resources web page. 

If an assessor prepares the on-site assessment report on his/her computer, it is the assessor’s 

responsibility to ensure that the current version of the document has been downloaded from the 

NVLAP web site and is used. The revision date of the document is found in the footer on each 

page. 

Please direct any questions about this bulletin to your NVLAP Program Manager: 

Brad Moore at 301-975-5740, <brad.moore@nist.gov>, or Kurt Fischer at 301-975-6061, 

<kurt.fischer@nist.gov>.
4. Governing Law. This Supplemental Guarantee shall be governed by and construed inaccordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to conflict of law principlesthereof.     5. Successors and Assigns. This Supplemental Guarantee shall be binding upon thesuccessors, assigns, receivers, trustees and representatives of Ocean I and shall inure to thebenefit of the Holders of the Debentures and the Capital Securities then outstanding.     6. Headings. The headings used in this Supplemental Guarantee are inserted forconvenience only and shall not in any way affect the meaning or construction of any provision ofthis Supplemental Guarantee.     7. Counterparts. This Supplemental Guarantee may be executed in several counterparts,each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Supplemental Guarantee to be dulyexecuted by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized, as of the day and year first abovewritten.      OCEAN I CORPORATION