alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

House Calendar No. 169

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 409

[Report No. 105–497]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3717) to prohibit the expenditure

of Federal funds for the distribution of needles or syringes for the

hypodermic injection of illegal drugs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 28, 1998

Mr. SOLOMON, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3717) to prohibit the expenditure of Federal funds for the distribution of needles or syringes for the hypodermic injection

of illegal drugs.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R.

3 3717) to prohibit the expenditure of Federal funds for the

4 distribution of needles or syringes for the hypodermic in5 jection of illegal drugs. The bill shall be considered as read

6 for amendment. The previous question shall be considered
2

HRES 409 RH

1 as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening

2 motion except: (1) two hours of debate on the bill equally

3 divided and controlled by Representative Wicker of Mis4 sissippi or his designee and a Member opposed to the bill;

5 and (2) one motion to recommit.

House Calendar No. 169

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 409

[Report No. 105–497]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3717)

hypodermic injection of illegal drugs.the distribution of needles or syringes for theto prohibit the expenditure of Federal funds for

APRIL 28, 1998

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 282 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     November 13, 1997.
Whereas 1997 marks the 30th anniversary of the Association of South East Asian 
        Nations (ASEAN);
Whereas the emphasis of ASEAN on cooperation and the nonviolent settlement of 
        disputes has helped to bring peace between the nations of the region 
        which for decades had been characterized by instability and conflict;
Whereas the economies of the member nations of ASEAN have experienced 
        significant economic growth benefiting the lives of many of their 
        people;
Whereas ASEAN as a group is the 4th largest trading partner of the United States 
        and constitutes a larger market for United States exports than the 
        People's Republic of China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong combined;
Whereas ASEAN has successfully fostered a sense of community among its member 
        nations despite differing interests, including the establishment of the 
        region's only security forum, the Association of South East Asian 
        Nations Regional Forum (ARF), and the Association of South East Asian 
        Nations Free Trade Area (AFTA);
Whereas ASEAN has played a pivotal role in international efforts of global and 
        regional concern, including securing the withdrawal of Vietnamese forces 
        from Cambodia and diplomatic efforts to foster a political settlement to 
        the civil war in Cambodia;
Whereas the United States relies on ASEAN as a partner in fostering regional 
        stability, enhancing prosperity, and promoting peace; and
Whereas the 30th anniversary of the formation of ASEAN offers an opportunity for 
        the United States and the nations of ASEAN to renew their commitment to 
        international cooperation on issues of mutual interest and concern: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates the Association of South East Asian Nations 
        (ASEAN) and its member nations on the occasion of its 30th anniversary;
            (2) looks forward to a broadening and deepening of friendship and 
        cooperation with ASEAN in the years ahead for the benefit of the people 
        of the United States and the nations of ASEAN;
            (3) encourages progress by ASEAN members toward the further 
        development of democracy, respect for human rights, enhancement of the 
        rule of law, and the expansion of market economies; and
            (4) recognizes the past achievements of ASEAN and pledges its 
        support to work closely with ASEAN as both the United States and the 
        nations of ASEAN face current and future regional and global challenges.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
CFTC Ex. 409

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 81-8 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1808
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 81-8 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:1809
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 81-8 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:1810
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 81-8 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:1811
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 81-8 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:1812
**EXHIBIT
32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.
&SECT;&NBSP;1350)**
 
  I,
Charles E. Ramey, OF US Dataworks, Inc. certify pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
  (i)  the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the
“Report”), which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
  (ii)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of US Dataworks,
Inc.
  ****Date: February 14,
    2005
    By:
    /s/ Charles E.
  RameyCharles E. Ramey,Chief
      Executive Officer
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Ausberry, Appellant.

*515(No. 943

Decided June 25, 1948.)

*Mr. Paul A. Baden,*for appellee.

*Messrs. Gasper é Gasper,*for appellant.

Ross, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Juvenile Court of Butler county, in which the defendant was sentenced for violation of the provisions of Section 1639-45, General Code.

Art examination of the record requires the conclusion that no error, prejudicial to the defendant, appellant herein, intervened in the trial and conviction of the defendant.

In the judgment entry of the trial court containing the sentence of the defendant, it is recited that the defendant was asked whether she had anything to say why sentence should not be pronounced. The record contained in the bill of exceptions, however, shows that the defendant was sentenced in her absence, and *516no claim is made that such was not the case. This-being true, the mandatory provisions of Section 13451-1, General Code, were ignored and the judgment and sentence of the trial court must be set aside, and the-case remanded to the trial court for resentence of the-defendant, but only for such purpose. *Silsby*v. *State,*119 Ohio St., 314, 164 N. E., 232.

It is to be noted that former Section 13694, General Code, repealed, is now Section 13451-1, General Code,, except that the latter section now includes cases where-the defendant is found guilty by “the finding of the-court” as well as by the verdict of a jury.

The violation of the provisions of Section 1639-45,. General Code, constitutes a misdemeanor. *Stockum*v. *State,*106 Ohio St., 249, 139 N. E., 855.

In certain cases, a defendant may be tried and sentenced in her absence. Section 13442-10, General' Code. However, this defendant did not request in. writing to be so tried. No journal entry appears to' such effect. Nor was the defendant *“indicted.”*She-was tried upon an affidavit charging a violation of Section 1639-45, General Code. In any event, she-did not escape or forfeit her recognizance after a jury was sworn. The provisions of Section 13442-10,. General Code, therefore, have no application to the-instant case.

The judgment and sentence of the Juvenile Court of Butler county of this defendant are, therefore, set aside, vacated, and reversed, and the case is remanded' to that court solely and only for the purpose of so sentencing such defendant as in the discretion of such court at that time may seem proper and in conformity to law.

*Judgment reversed.*

Matthews, P. J., Ross and Hildebrant, JJ., concur in the syllabus, opinion and judgment.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission

# DATE AND TIME:

Thursday, November 13, 2014 at 2:00 p.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Internal personnel rules and internal rules and practices. Information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to have a considerable adverse effect on the implementation of a proposed Commission action.

* * * * *

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shelley E. Garr,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2014-26798 Filed 11-7-14; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
IV

House Calendar No. 173

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 414

[Report No. 105–502]

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to consideration

of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 29, 1998

Mr. MCINNIS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect

to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the

Committee on Rules.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 4(b) of rule

2 XI for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported from that committee before May 1, 1998, providing

6 for consideration or disposition of the bill (H.R. 3579)

7 making emergency supplemental appropriations for the
2

HRES 414 RH

1 fiscal year ending September 30, 1998, and for other pur2 poses, an amendment thereto, a conference report thereon,

3 or an amendment reported in disagreement from a con4 ference thereon.

House Calendar No. 173

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 414

[Report No. 105–502]

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI

tions reported from the Committee on Rules.with respect to consideration of certain resoluAPRIL 29, 1998

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000474

05-APR-2018

09:43 AM
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

NIKE, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

WAREHOUSEINCHINA STORE and THE 

INDIVIDUALS AND ENTITIES OPERATING 

WAREHOUSEINCHINA STORE,

Defendants.

Case No. 20-cv-02618

Judge John Z. Lee

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cummings

DECLARATION OF SERVICE

I, Jake M. Christensen, of the City of Chicago, in the State of Illinois, declare as follows: 

1. I am an attorney at law, duly admitted to practice before the Courts of the State of Illinois

and the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. I am one of the 

attorneys for Plaintiff Nike, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Nike”). Except as otherwise expressly 

stated to the contrary, I have personal knowledge of the following facts and, if called as a 

witness, I could and would competently testify as follows: 

2. On July 16, 2020, this Court entered an Order [50] permitting Nike to complete service of 

process to Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f)(3) by electronically 

publishing a link to the Second Amended Complaint, Temporary Restraining Order,

Summons and other relevant documents on a website and by sending an e-mail to the email addresses identified in Exhibit 3 to the Declaration of Joe Pallett and any e-mail 

addresses provided for Defendants by third parties that includes a link to said website.

Case: 1:20-cv-02618 Document #: 55-1 Filed: 08/10/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:4222
2

3. I hereby certify that on August 10, 2020, I electronically published the Second Amended 

Complaint, Temporary Restraining Order, Summons and other relevant documents on a 

website. 

4. I hereby certify that on August 10, 2020, I sent an e-mail to the e-mail addresses identified 

in Exhibit 3 to the Declaration of Joe Pallett and any e-mail addresses provided for 

Defendants by third parties that includes a link to said website. 

5. The completed Return of Service form is attached hereto.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed this 10th day of August 2020, at Chicago, Illinois. 

/s/ Jake M. Christensen

Jake M. Christensen

GREER, BURNS & CRAIN, LTD. 

300 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 2500

Chicago, Illinois 60606

Telephone: 312-360-0080

jchristensen@gbc.law

Counsel for Plaintiff Nike, Inc.

Case: 1:20-cv-02618 Document #: 55-1 Filed: 08/10/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:4223
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.333-128478 pertaining to the Williams Scotsman International, Inc. 2005 OmnibusAward Plan and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Williams ScotsmanInternational, Inc. and Form S-8 No. 333-128457 pertaining to the ScotsmanHoldings, Inc. 1994 Employee Stock Option Plan, Scotsman Holdings, Inc. 1997Amended and Restated Employee Stock Option Plan, and the Scotsman Holdings,Inc. 2003 Employee Stock Option Plan) of our reports dated March 9, 2007, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of WilliamsScotsman International, Inc., Williams Scotsman International, Inc. management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of WilliamsScotsman International, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for theyear ended December 31, 2006.
|  |   | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
|--|--------|---------------------------|

 

Baltimore, MarylandMarch 9, 2007

----
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.18  


 
 

AMENDMENT TO DRS TECHNOLOGIES INC.
  AMENDED AND RESTATED 1996 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN    
    


        This Amendment, dated as of March 9, 2004 is made to the DRS Technologies Inc. Amended and Restated 1996 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the "Plan").
Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan. 


        WHEREAS,
DRS Technologies, Inc. has previously adopted the Plan; 


        WHEREAS,
pursuant to Section 21 of the Plan, the Committee may, subject to the limitations contained therein, amend the Plan; 


        WHEREAS,
pursuant to Section 13 of the Plan, the Committee may grant restricted stock units; 


        WHEREAS,
the Committee desires to amend the Plan to specifically name restricted stock units as a type of Other Award which may be granted under Section 13 and to remove
extraneous references to laws which are no longer applicable; 


        WHEREAS,
the Committee recognizes that such amendments for clarification purposes do not constitute material amendment of the Plan; 


        NOW
THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 21 of the Plan, the Plan is amended as follows: 



        1.     The
following section shall be added as Section 2(bb) and the remainder of Section 2 shall be renumbered accordingly: 




"Restricted
Stock Unit" shall mean the right, granted pursuant to Section 13, to receive, subject to such restrictions as the Committee may determine, the Fair Market Value of a share of
Company Stock in shares. 





        2.     In
the second paragraph of Section 4, the phrase "except with regard to Non-Qualified Stock Options granted to Non-Employee Directors
pursuant to Section 14 hereof" shall be removed and the phrase "Restricted Stock Unit" shall be added after the phrase "Phantom Stock" and before "or other Incentive Award." 



        3.     In
the first paragraph of Section 6, the phrase "Restricted Stock Units" shall be added after the phrase "Stock Bonus" and before "and Other Awards." 


        4.     Section 13
shall be replaced in its entirety with the following: 




Other
forms of Incentive Awards ("Other Awards"), including Restricted Stock Units, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, Company Stock may be granted either alone or in
addition to other Incentive Awards under the Plan. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall have sole and complete authority to determine the persons to whom and the time or times at
which such Other Awards shall be granted, the number of shares of Company Stock to be granted pursuant to such Other Awards and all other conditions of such Other Awards. 





        5.     This
Amendment is effective as of the date first set forth above. Except as amended hereunder, all other terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and
effect. 












QuickLinks


AMENDMENT TO DRS TECHNOLOGIES INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED 1996 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Ohm’s Law","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"bgwXTnrgkI\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/ohms-law\/\">Ohm’s Law<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/ohms-law\/embed\/#?secret=bgwXTnrgkI\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Ohm’s Law” — NASA\" data-secret=\"bgwXTnrgkI\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/x-57-mod-ii-ohm-cover.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 496 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
H. RES. 496

 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a three-
               fifths vote to increase the minimum wage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 1998

 Mr. Tiahrt submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a three-
               fifths vote to increase the minimum wage.

    Resolved, That clause 5 of rule XXI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
    ``(e) No bill, joint resolution, amendment, or conference report 
carrying a minimum wage increase shall be considered as passed or 
agreed to unless so determined by a vote of not less than three-fifths 
of the Members voting. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the term 
`minimum wage increase' means any amendment to section 6 of the Fair 
Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase the minimum wage.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 15,847.

#### The State *v.*Kern.

CbiminaIí *Law.*— Appeal *by the State.*— Instmetion.—Review.—In an appeal by the State, where there is no statement in the bill of exceptions show-' ing that there was evidence to which the instructions requested were relevant, no question of law is presented upon the refusal of the request.

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

*M. B. Beard,*Prosecuting Attorney, and *W. R. Moore,*for the State.

*S. O. Bayless, C. G. Guenther*and *J. Glaybaugh,*for appellee.

Elliott, J.

This appeal is prosecuted by the State, and counsel assume that the record presents questions of law upon the refusal to give instructions asked by the State, but we can not regard this assumption as valid.

There is no statement in the record showing that the instructions were relevant to the evidence, and hence no question of law is presented for decision. Without some statement of the evidence we must presume that the instructions were refused, because there was no evidence to which they were applicable. While it is true that it is neither necessary nor proper in appeals by the State to set forth the evidence *466in full, it is also true that there must be some statement in the bill of exceptions showing that there was evidence to which the instructions were relevant. It is a familiar rule of appellate procedure that the court will not decide mere .abstract questions, and where there are no facts stated only abstract questions can, in siích a case as this, arise upon a ruling refusing instructions.

Filed March 17, 1891.

Judgment affirmed.