alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>




     <ARTICLE>                                                     5
     <MULTIPLIER>                                              1,000

     <S>                                                 <C>
     <PERIOD-TYPE>                                             3-MOS
     <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-30-2000
     <PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-02-2000
     <PERIOD-END>                                        APR-01-2000
     <CASH>                                                    4,191
     <SECURITIES>                                                  0
     <RECEIVABLES>                                            17,914
     <ALLOWANCES>                                               (429)
     <INVENTORY>                                              73,012
     <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        102,256
     <PP&E>                                                   41,611
     <DEPRECIATION>                                          (14,448)
     <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          463,615
     <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    44,976
     <BONDS>                                                 325,513
     <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
     <PREFERRED>                                                   0
     <COMMON>                                                      0
     <OTHER-SE>                                               57,517
     <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          463,615
     <SALES>                                                  73,394
     <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         73,394
     <CGS>                                                    37,754
     <TOTAL-COSTS>                                            28,176
     <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
     <LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
     <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        8,623
     <INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (1,159)
     <INCOME-TAX>                                               (603)
     <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (556)
     <DISCONTINUED>                                                0
     <EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
     <CHANGES>                                                     0
     <NET-INCOME>                                               (556)
     <EPS-BASIC>                                                 0
     <EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0



</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of FirstConsulting Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies,to his knowledge, that:

(i)    the accompanying QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)   the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: August 9, 2006 | /s/ LARRY R. FERGUSON   |   |
|-----------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                  | Larry R. Ferguson       |   |
|                  | Chief Executive Officer |   |

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelyto accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SECRelease No. 33-8238.  This certificationshall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be incorporated by reference inany filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whethermade before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporationlanguage in such filing.

----
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 15.1
                          CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE



May 15, 2001

ESG Re Limited
Skandia International House
16 Church Street
Hamilton, Bermuda


We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of ESG Re Limited and subsidiaries for the periods ended March 31,
2001 and 2000, as indicated in our report dated May 15, 2001; because we did not
perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001 is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-40107 on Form S-8,
in Registration Statement No. 333-76983 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement
No. 333-32302 on Form S-8.

We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche
----------------------
Deloitte & Touche
Dublin, Ireland
#### Commonwealth *v.*H. M. Wells.

Criminal Law — Unlawful Gaming — Permitted by Servants and Agents— Guilty Knowledge of Principal.

While the unlawful conduct of the defendant’s agents in the control of his house may have been' strong evidence of his own guilty knowledge, it did not constitute his guilt.

APPEAL FROM MADISON CIRCUIT COURT.

November 8, 1871.

*196
      *Burnam, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Hardin :

This was a prosecution against the appellee, a licensed tavern-keeper, for permitting a faro 'bank to be set up and kept in his house. A trial of the case having resulted in his acquittal, the commonwealth prosecutes this appeal for a reversal of the judgment. The only question presented is as to the action of the court in refusing to instruct the jury in substance and effect, that if the unlawful gaming in the defendant’s house was permitted by other persons than himself, who were at the time engaged in his service, and acting as his agents in keeping the house, he was responsible therefor. While the unlawful conduct of the defendant’s agents in the control of his house may have been strong evidence Of his own guilty knowledge, it did not, in our opinion, constitute 'his guilt, and the court properly refused the instructions. Therefore the judgment is affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6216

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SHAWN LAPRELLE BOOKER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (CR-93-48, CA-97-7-5)

Submitted: August 25, 1998 Decided: October 7, 1998

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shawn Laprelle Booker, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow,

Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Laprelle Booker seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. The evidence was sufficient to show that

Booker “carried” a firearm under 18 U.S.C.A. § 924(c)(1) (West 1994

& Supp. 1998), and thus to establish a factual basis for Booker’s

guilty plea to using and carrying a firearm in relation to a drug

offense. See Muscarello v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 66 U.S.L.W.

4459 (U.S. June 8, 1998) (Nos. 96-1654, 96-8837); United States v.

Mitchell, 104 F.3d 649, 652 (4th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Booker, Nos. CR93-48; CA-97-7-5 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 15, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.1

Eastern Division

Demetrius Johnson

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04156

Honorable Sara L. Ellis

Reynaldo Guevara, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, September 27, 2023:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The Court grants Plaintiff's

motion to withdraw the appearance of counsel [274] and withdraws the appearance of

Danielle Hamilton as counsel for Plaintiff. The Court strikes the status date set for

9/27/2023 and resets it to 5/1/2024 at 9:30 AM for ruling on Defendants' motion for

summary judgment. Mailed notice(rj, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04156 Document #: 279 Filed: 09/27/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:6819
EXHIBIT 15.1


August 13, 1999

ESG Re Limited
Skandia International House
16 Church Street
Hamilton, Bermuda


We have made a review, in accordance with standards  established by the American
Institute of Certified Public  Accountants,  of the unaudited  interim financial
information  of ESG Re Limited and  subsidiaries  for the periods ended June 30,
1999 and 1998, as indicated in our report dated August 11, 1999;  because we did
not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware  that our  report  referred  to above,  which is  included  in your
Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-Q  for  the  quarter  ended  June  30,  1999  is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-40341 on Form F-1.

We are also aware that the aforementioned report,  pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the  Securities  Act of  1933,  is not  considered  a part  of the  Registration
Statement  prepared  or  certified  by an  accountant  or a report  prepared  or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche
----------------------
Deloitte & Touche
Hamilton, Bermuda
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 221 (Monday, November 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 68497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27179]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #14184]


Washington Disaster #WA-00051 Declaration of Economic Injury

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) 
declaration for the State of Washington, dated 11/07/2014.
    Incident: Mercer Island E. Coli Water Contamination.
    Incident Period: 09/27/2014 through 10/11/2014.

DATES: Effective Date: 11/07/2014.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 08/07/2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's EIDL declaration, applications for economic injury 
disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other 
locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: King.
Contiguous Counties:
    Washington: Chelan, Kitsap, Kittitas, Pierce, Snohomish, Yakima.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without credit      4.000
 available elsewhere.........................................
Non-profit organizations without credit available elsewhere..      2.625
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 141840.
    The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Washington.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59002)

    Dated: November 7, 2014.
Maria Contreras-Sweet,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014-27179 Filed 11-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### SEARIVER MARITIME FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Rodney SLATER, et al., Defendants.

No. A97-0060-CV-HRH.

United States District Court, D. Alaska.

July 13, 1998.

*ORDER*

HOLLAND, District Judge.

*Motion to Alter or Amend*Judgment1

Plaintiff moves pursuant to Rule 59, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for an alteration or amendment of the court’s judgment herein which dismissed plaintiffs complaint with prejudice. The motion is opposed. Oral argument has not been requested and is not deemed necessary.

By order filed June 4, 1998,2 the court decided this case on cross-motions for summary judgment. In the instant motion, plaintiff suggests that the court misinterpreted paragraph 20 of the consent decree by which the parties concluded earlier litigation between them. The argument which plaintiff now makes is at best a modest variation of arguments already made by the plaintiff and already rejected by the court. Paragraph 20 of the consent decree provided with some amplification that the parties were settling “any and all claims”.

The plaintiff (and its predecessor, Exxon Shipping Company) is not an unsophisticated party. The plaintiff (Exxon Shipping) in the earlier litigation was represented by a substantial number of lawyers, all of whom are highly experienced and competent to handle the business of the most sophisticated of clients. Witness some of the other terms of the consent decree, clients and counsel of the sophistication of those involved in this case do not sign agreements without parsing them with extraordinary care to be certain that they have said what they meant to say; and the court believes that the consent decree (Paragraph 20) means exactly what it says. The parties settled “any and all claims”. Where the parties meant to except a matter from the reach of that term, the parties expressly included an exception. The peripheral (“including without limitation [etc.]”) language which follows the release of any and all claims is merely descriptive, and the court rejects the notion that the failure to *757mention constitutional claims in the latter language detracts from the reach of the general proposition which was that the parties were buying complete peace except for very specifically enumerated matters which did not include this dispute over whether or not the tanker *Exxon Valdez*(now *SeaRiver*Mediterranean) has been unconstitutionally barred from Prince William Sound.

The motion to alter or amend judgment is denied.

1

. Clerk’s Docket No. 42.

2

. Clerk’s Docket No. 40.
CFTC Ex. 470

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-14 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1115
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-14 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:1116
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-14 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:1117
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

         I, Douglas P. Rosefsky, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of North Atlantic
Holding Company, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: August 19, 2005


/s/ Douglas P. Rosefsky
---------------------------------
Name:    Douglas P. Rosefsky
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
IV

House Calendar No. 196

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 446

[Report No. 105–548]

Disposing of the conference report to accompany the bill (S. 1150) to ensure

that federally funded agricultural research, extension, and education address high-priority concerns with national or multistate significance, to

reform, extend, and eliminate certain agricultural research programs,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 22 (legislative day of MAY 21), 1998

Mr. SOLOMON, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Disposing of the conference report to accompany the bill

(S. 1150) to ensure that federally funded agricultural

research, extension, and education address high-priority

concerns with national or multistate significance, to reform, extend, and eliminate certain agricultural research

programs, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (S. 1150) to ensure that federally funded
2

HRES 446 RH

1 agricultural research, extension, and education address

2 high-priority concerns with national or multistate signifi3 cance, to reform, extend, and eliminate certain agricul4 tural research programs, and for other purposes. All

5 points of order against the conference report (except those

6 arising under clause 3 of rule XXVIII and predicated on

7 provisions in subtitle A of title V) and against its consider8 ation (except those arising under section 425 of the Con9 gressional Budget Act of 1974) are waived. If a point of

10 order against the conference report for failure to comply

11 with clause 3 of rule XXVIII is sustained, the conference

12 report shall be considered as rejected and the pending

13 question shall be, without intervention of any point of

14 order, whether the House shall recede from its amendment

15 and agree to an amendment to the Senate bill consisting

16 of the text of the conference report, modified by striking

17 subtitle A of title V. The previous question shall be consid18 ered as ordered on the motion to final adoption without

19 intervening motion or demand for division of the question.

House Calendar No. 196

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 446

[Report No. 105–548]

RESOLUTION

Disposing of the conference report to accompany

and for other purposes.eliminate certain agricultural research programs,multistate significance, to reform, extend, andaddress high-priority concerns with national oragricultural research, extension, and educationthe bill (S. 1150) to ensure that federally funded

MAY 22 (legislative day of MAY 21), 1998

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### TY-LAN ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MENARD, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-1578.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Nov. 29, 2004.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R.App. P. 42(b).