Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 219 / Thursday, November 13, 2014 / Notices 67423 

1See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 79 

FR 44743 (August 1, 2014). 

2 Id. 

3See Petitioners’ August 18, 2014, submission. 

4See Petitioners’ September 2, 2014, submission. 

5For the full scope of the Order, see ‘‘Issues and 

Decision Memorandum for the Expedited First 

Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on 

Certain Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks from 

the People’s Republic of China’’ from Christian 

Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. 

Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently 

with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (‘‘Issues 

and Decision Memorandum’’). 

procedures (e.g., the filing of letters of 

appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 

351.103(d)). 

This notice is issued and published 

pursuant to sections 702 and 777(i) of 

the Act. 

Dated: November 5, 2014. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

Scope of the Investigations 

The merchandise covered by these 

investigations is circular welded carbon and 

alloy steel (other than stainless steel) pipe of 

a kind used for oil or gas pipelines (welded 

line pipe), not more than 24 inches in 

nominal outside diameter, regardless of wall 

thickness, length, surface finish, end finish, 

or stenciling. Welded line pipe is normally 

produced to the American Petroleum 

Institute (API) specification 5L, but can be 

produced to comparable foreign 

specifications, to proprietary grades, or can 

be non-graded material. All pipe meeting the 

physical description set forth above, 

including multiple-stenciled pipe with an 

API or comparable foreign specification line 

pipe stencil is covered by the scope of these 

investigations. 

The welded line pipe that is subject to 

these investigations is currently classifiable 

in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 

7305.11.1030, 7305.11.5000, 7305.12.1030, 

7305.12.5000, 7305.19.1030, 7305.19.5000, 

7306.19.1010, 7306.19.1050, 7306.19.5110, 

and 7306.19.5150. The subject merchandise 

may also enter in HTSUS 7305.11.1060 and 

7305.12.1060. While the HTSUS subheadings 

are provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

scope of these investigations is dispositive. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26897 Filed 11–12–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–941] 

Certain Kitchen Appliance Shelving 

and Racks From the People’s Republic 

of China: Final Results of Expedited 

First Sunset Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On August 1, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

‘‘Department’’) published the notice of 

initiation of the first five-year (‘‘sunset’’) 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on certain kitchen appliance shelving 

and racks (‘‘KASR’’) from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (the ‘‘Act’’).1 As a result of 

this sunset review, the Department finds 

that revocation of the antidumping duty 

order on KASR from the PRC would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping. The magnitude 

of the dumping margins likely to prevail 

is indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of 

Review’’ section of this notice. 

DATES: Effective Date: November 13, 

2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–6905. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

As noted above, on August 1, 2014, 

the Department published the initiation 

of the first sunset review of KASR from 

the PRC.2 On August 18, 2014, 

Nashville Wire Products, Inc. 

(‘‘Nashville Wire’’) and SSW Holding 

Company, Inc. (‘‘SSW’’) (collectively, 

‘‘Petitioners’’) timely notified the 

Department of their intent to participate 

within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(i), claiming domestic 

interested party status under section 

771(9)(C) of the Act.3 On September 2, 

2014, the Department received an 

adequate substantive response from 

Petitioners within the deadline 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).4

We received no responses from 

respondent interested parties. As a 

result, the Department conducted an 

expedited (120-day) sunset review of the 

order, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). 

Scope of the Order 

The scope of the order consists of 

shelving and racks for refrigerators, 

freezers, combined refrigerator-freezers, 

other refrigerating or freezing 

equipment, cooking stoves, ranges, and 

ovens (‘‘certain kitchen appliance 

shelving and racks’’ or ‘‘the 

merchandise under order’’). 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is currently classifiable in the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) statistical 

reporting numbers 8418.99.8050, 

8418.99.8060, 7321.90.5000, 

7321.90.6090, 8516.90.8000 and 

8419.90.9520. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of the 

order is dispositive.5

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this sunset review 

are addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. The issues discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

include the likelihood of continuation 

or recurrence of dumping and the 

magnitude of the margins likely to 

prevail if the order were to be revoked. 

Parties may find a complete discussion 

of all issues raised in the review and the 

corresponding recommendations in this 

public memorandum which is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (‘‘IA 

ACCESS’’). IA ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

iaaccess.trade.gov, and is available to all 

parties in the Central Records Unit, 

room 7046 of the main Department of 

Commerce building. In addition, a 

complete version of the Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

on the Internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

The signed and electronic versions of 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

are identical in content. 

Final Results of Review 

Pursuant to section 752(c) of the Act, 

the Department determines that 

revocation of the order would be likely 

to lead to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping at weighted-average margins 

up to 95.99 percent. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) 

of their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of the return of 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
67424 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 219 / Thursday, November 13, 2014 / Notices 

1See Countervailing Duty Investigation of 

Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Determination and 

Alignment of Final Determination with Final 

Antidumping Determination, 79 FR 10097 

(February 24, 2014) (‘‘Preliminary Determination’’). 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

We are publishing these final results 

and notice in accordance with sections 

751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: November 4, 2014. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26789 Filed 11–12–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–991] 

Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the 

People’s Republic of China: 

Countervailing Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: Based on affirmative final 

determinations by the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘Department’’) and the 

International Trade Commission 

(‘‘ITC’’), the Department is issuing a 

countervailing duty order on 

chlorinated isocyanurates (‘‘Isos’’) from 

the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). 

DATES: Effective Date: November 13, 

2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Walker or Matthew Renkey, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office V, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0413 or (202) 482– 

2312, respectively. 

Background 

In accordance with section 705(d) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(‘‘Act’’), on September 22, 2014, the 

Department published its final 

determination that countervailable 

subsidies are being provided to 

producers and exporters of Isos from the 

PRC. See Chlorinated Isocyanurates 

from the People’s Republic of China: 

Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty 

Determination; 2012, 79 FR 56560 

(September 22, 2014) (‘‘Final 

Determination’’). 

On November 3, 2014, the ITC 

notified the Department of its final 

determination pursuant to section 

705(d) of the Act that an industry in the 

United States is threatened with 

material injury within the meaning of 

section 705(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the Act by 

reason of subsidized imports of subject 

merchandise from the PRC. See 

Chlorinated Isocyanurates from China 

and Japan, USITC Investigation Nos. 

701–TA–501 and 731–TA–1226 (Final), 

USITC Publication 4494 (November 

2014). 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by this order 

are chlorinated isocyanurates. 

Chlorinated isocyanurates are 

derivatives of cyanuric acid, described 

as chlorinated s-triazine triones. There 

are three primary chemical 

compositions of chlorinated 

isocyanurates: (1) Trichloroisocyanuric 

acid (‘‘TCCA’’) (Cl3(NCO)3), (2) sodium 

dichloroisocyanurate (dihydrate) 

(NaCl2(NCO)3 X 2H2O), and (3) sodium 

dichloroisocyanurate (anhydrous) 

(NaCl2(NCO)3). Chlorinated 

isocyanurates are available in powder, 

granular and solid (e.g., tablet or stick) 

forms. 

Chlorinated isocyanurates are 

currently classifiable under subheadings 

2933.69.6015, 2933.69.6021, 

2933.69.6050, 3808.50.4000, 

3808.94.5000, and 3808.99.9500 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). The tariff 

classification 2933.69.6015 covers 

sodium dichloroisocyanurates 

(anhydrous and dihydrate forms) and 

trichloroisocyanuric acid. The tariff 

classifications 2933.69.6021 and 

2933.69.6050 represent basket categories 

that include chlorinated isocyanurates 

and other compounds including an 

unfused triazine ring. The tariff 

classifications 3808.50.4000, 

3808.94.5000 and 3808.99.9500 cover 

disinfectants that include chlorinated 

isocyanurates. The HTSUS subheadings 

are provided for convenience and 

customs purposes. The written 

description of the scope of this order is 

dispositive. 

Countervailing Duty Order 

In accordance with sections 

705(b)(1)(A)(ii) and 705(d) of the Act, 

the ITC has notified the Department of 

its final determination that the industry 

in the United States producing Isos is 

threatened with material injury by 

reason of subsidized imports of drawn 

sinks from the PRC. Therefore, in 

accordance with section 705(c)(2) of the 

Act, we are publishing this 

countervailing duty order. 

According to section 706(b)(2) of the 

Act, countervailing duties shall be 

assessed on subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the ITC’s notice of final 

determination if that determination is 

based upon the threat of material injury. 

Section 706(b)(1) of the Act states, ‘‘{i}f 

the Commission, in its final 

determination under section 705(b), 

finds material injury or threat of 

material injury which, but for the 

suspension of liquidation under section 

703(d)(2), would have led to a finding 

of material injury, then entries of the 

merchandise subject to the 

countervailing duty order, the 

liquidation of which has been 

suspended under section 703(d)(2), 

shall be subject to the imposition of 

countervailing duties under section 

701(a).’’ In addition, section 706(b)(2) of 

the Act requires U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) to refund any 

cash deposits or bonds of estimated 

countervailing duties posted before the 

date of publication of the ITC’s final 

affirmative determination, if the ITC’s 

final determination is based on threat 

other than the threat described in 

section 706(b)(1) of the Act. Because the 

ITC’s final determination in this case is 

based on the threat of material injury 

and is not accompanied by a finding 

that injury would have resulted but for 

the imposition of suspension of 

liquidation of entries since the 

publication of the Department’s 

Preliminary Determination in the 

Federal Register,1 section 706(b)(2) of 

the Act applies. 

Suspension of Liquidation 

As a result of the ITC’s determination 

and in accordance with section 706(a)(1) 

of the Act, the Department will direct 

CBP to assess, upon further instruction 

by the Department, countervailing 

duties equal to the amount of the net 

countervailable subsidy for all relevant 

entries of Isos from the PRC. The 

Department instructed CBP to 

discontinue the suspension of 

liquidation on June 24, 2014, in 

accordance with section 703(d) of the 

Act. Section 703(d) states that the 

suspension of liquidation pursuant to a 

preliminary determination may not 

remain in effect for more than four 

months. Entries of Isos from the PRC 

made on or after June 24, 2014, and 

prior to the date of publication of the 

ITC’s final determination in the Federal 

Register are not liable for the 

assessment of countervailing duties 

because of the Department’s 

discontinuation, effective June 24, 2014, 

of the suspension of liquidation. 

In accordance with section 706 of the 

Act, the Department will direct CBP to 

reinstitute suspension of liquidation, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES