alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

No. 21-50255 Summary Calendar

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee ,

versus

Marcelino Esteban Medina-Castillo,

Defendant—Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:20-CR-481-1

Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: *

Marcelino Esteban Medina-Castillo pleaded guilty to one count of illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U. S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1), and was sentenced within the guidelines rang e to 37 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. On ap peal, he argues that the district court

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 4, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-50255 Document: 00516153149 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/04/2022No. 21-50255

2 plainly erred by failing to provide him with various admonishments required by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11( b)(1), at his rearraignment hearing.

Because Medina-Castillo did not raise any Rule 11 issues in the district court, our review is limited to plain error. See United States v. Vonn , 535 U.S. 55, 58-59 (2002). To show plain error, Medina-Castillo must show a forfeited
error that is clear or obvious and th at affects his substantial rights. See Puckett
v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009). If he makes such a showing, we
have the discretion to correct the error bu t will do so only if it seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. See id.

In order to demonstrate that an e rror affected his substantial rights,
Medina-Castillo must show that there is a “reasonable probability” that he would not have pleaded guilt y “but for the error.” United States v. Dominguez Benitez , 542 U.S. 74, 76 (2004). In analyzing whether a defendant’s substantial rights were affe cted, we examine the entire record.
Id. Assuming that Medina-Castillo ha s shown that the district court’s omission of various admonishments requ ired by Rule 11(b)(1) were clear or obvious errors, he has failed to estab lish that such errors affected his substantial rights. See id

. The judgment is AFFIRMED. Case: 21-50255 Document: 00516153149 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/04/2022
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-22-00245-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 325th District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 323-107644-18, 325-719948-22

Before Birdwell, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN THE INTEREST OF Y.J., A CHILD
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal from the June 9, 2022 judgment. See

Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b). The newly assigned trial judge then granted appellant’s timely 

filed motion for new trial on August 19, 2022, within the trial court’s plenary 

jurisdiction. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b(a), (e).

Because the trial court’s order moots the appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want 

of jurisdiction.1

 See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); Wilkins v. Methodist Health Care 

Sys., 160 S.W.3d 559, 563 (Tex. 2005). The parties will pay their own costs. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: August 25, 2022

1

Likewise, appellant’s motion to abate the appeal is denied as moot.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 567 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                       October 2, 1998.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 4101) making 
appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, 
and Related Agencies programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1999, and 
for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and 
against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered 
as read.
    Sec. 2. House Resolution 551 is laid on the table.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. §1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment Number 1 to the Quarterly
Report of NB Capital Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period
ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Serge Lacroix, Chairman and President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ Serge Lacroix
Serge Lacroix 
Chairman of the Board and President
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:   November 17, 2005

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
From: Baumbach, George G (GRANT)

Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 12:19:39 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)

To: aiframework <aiframework@nist.gov>

Subject: Playbook Feedback.

1) In MAP-2 replace "Classification" with "Categorization". Classification is a confusing word in this 

context since classification is 'class' (or category) of AI. This would also more closely mirror the NIST 

RMF. 

2)I suggest a MAP-6 "Risks to AI Specific Cybersecurity Threats are mapped, modelled, and addressed".

This includes attacks like model extraction and robustness attacks. These attacks should be considered 

before deploying a model. The threats should be modelled and addressed like any other cybersecurity 

risk. It is important that the NIST AI RMF framework addresses AI specific attacks because they are not 

addressed by any other governing documents

AI needs a mapping to the NIST CSF "Identify threats, vulnerabilities, and risk to assets" because the CSF 

doesn't recognize AI as a unique kind of asset - a different kind of software - that requires its own 

controls.

I have spoken about these kinds of attacks to corporate, academic, and industry audiences - all of whom 

were unaware that these attacks are possible. The NIST RMF should bring these topics into the 

conversation.

Grant Baumbach
NICE Community Coordinating Council

Meeting Agenda

March 22, 2023 | 3:15-5:00 p.m. ET

BlueJeans: https://primetime.bluejeans.com/a2m/live-event/ptdjuvcu 

Dial In: (800) 520- 9950| Pin: 3335462 followed by # to confirm

I. Introduction and Ground Rules – Danielle Santos, NICE Manager of Communications and 

Operations

II. Opening Remarks

a. Interim Academic Co-Chair – Paul Bingham, Vice President and Dean, College of 

Information Technology, Governors University

b. Government Co-Chair – Rodney Petersen, Director of NICE

III. Standing Items

a. Report Roundup – Learning from Good Ideas 

Building a Skilled Cyber Security Workforce

Presented by Marieke Vandeweyer, Organization for Economic Co-operation and 

Development (OECD) Centre for Skills

URL: https://www.oecd.org/publications/building-a-skilled-cyber-security-workforce-infive-countries-5fd44e6c-en.htm

b. Framework Feature – Applications and Uses of Workforce Framework for Cybersecurity 

Collaboratively Developed Knowledge Statements for Industrial Cybersecurity

Presented by Sean McBride, Idaho State University

c. Research Review- Driving Research on Effective Practices 

Cybersecurity Competitions as Educational Tools 

Presented by Ali Crawford, Research Analyst, Georgetown University

URL: https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/u-s-high-school-cybersecuritycompetitions/

IV. Working Group Updates

a. Promote Career Discovery

Co-chair: Keith Davis, Koinonia Family Life, Inc

b. Transform Learning Process

Co-chair: Richard Spires, Richard A. Spires Consulting 

c. Modernize Talent Management

Co-chair: Lynsey Caldwell, Leidos
V. Community of Interest Updates

a. Apprenticeships in Cybersecurity

Co-chair: Debbie McLeod, McLeod Information Systems

b. Cybersecurity Skills Competitions

Danielle Santos, NICE Manager of Communications and Operations 

c. K12 Cybersecurity Education

Co-chair: Thomas Trevethan, Palo Alto Networks

d. NICE Framework Users 

Karen Wetzel, Manager of the NICE Framework

VI. Project Progress Reports

a. NICE Conference and Expo (Seattle, Washington) – June 5-7, 2023 

Presented by Randy Pestana, Florida International University

URL: https://niceconference.org/

b. NICE K12 Cybersecurity Education Conference (Phoenix, Arizona) – December 4-5, 2023 

Presented by Felicia Rafeliff, iKeepSafe

URL: https://www.k12cybersecurityconference.org/

VII. Featured Topic

Tennessee’s Teacher Apprenticeship Model – Grow Your Own: Partnerships to 

Strengthen Tennessee’s Educator Pipeline

Presented by Emma McCallie, Senior Director of Grow Your Own, Tennessee 

Department of Education

URL: https://www.tn.gov/education/grow-your-own.html

VIII. Closing Remarks and Next Meeting Reminder

The next NICE Council Meeting will be April 26, at 3:30 p.m. ET.
!"#"$%&'&

()(*
+,-.,#/0$%

12)34567$&89$:8";<

==4(
>*!"#"$%?'&

*@=

41AB!C

>3(DCEF8&8&&&

!G%.H.;.I<C,%+<<.#+,;+J.$7I,I#+K+,%LGIK+:0G7

==4(
4DCEF8&8&&&8&&&

!G%.H.;.I<C,%+<<.#+,;+J.$7I,I#+K+,%LGIK+:0G7

>*=4(DCEF8&8&&&8MJ!LF8&&&

N0KK+,%0,LJM0;O&8P

*@=((242=)(4

)=!,0,QK0"$!,0,QK0"$

R=)S-+HI"<%TQI900U;0K 



V42)S==4(

C,G+$W+;%%0%9+;"GG+,%%0W.;$U+G9IW$;0,$.-+G%9+$+I$I--.%.0,I<0G+,9I,;+:9+G+,0%+-X

8J+Y".G++ZW<I,I%.0,$0H90:!C:0G7$:.%9I,Q$Q$%+K$;IWI[<+0H9I,-<.,#W+G$0,I<0GWG.\I%+

.,H0GKI%.0,'.,;<"-.,#.,%+#GI%.0,$:.%9$";9$Q$%+K$].,;0GW0GI%+.,.%+K0G^_

8J+Y".G+I$$"GI,;+$%9I%!C$Q$%+K$IG+WG0%+;%+-I#I.,$%",I"%90G.`+-I;;+$$I,-KI,.W"<I%.0,

].,;0GW0GI%+.,.%+K_

8N0,$.-+GI%.0,$H0G%9G+I%.,%+<<.#+,;+.,;0GW0GI%+-%0.-+,%.HQI,-I--G+$$,+:I,-+K+G#.,#%9G+I%$%0

!C].,;0GW0GI%+.,.%+K.,_

8J+Y".G+I"-.%I[<+-+$.#,$I,-9"KI,0\+G$.#9%%0.-+,%.HQ!C$Q$%+K;0KWG0K.$+$:.%9IWWG0WG.I%+

G+$W0,$+9I,-<.,#U!CI$$+$$K+,%$'WG+8-+W<0QK+,%UWG0-";%;+G%.H.;I%.0,].,;0GW0GI%+.,.%+Ka_

8J+#"<I%0GQ.,%+GWG+%I%.0,0HG+<+\I,%G+#"<I%.0,$G+<I%.,#%0!C$Q$%+K$WG0-";+--I%I'.,;<"-.,#I<<-I%I

WG.\I;Q]KIQ[+.,;0GW0GI%+.,.%+K^_

8G+\+,%.\+K+I$"G+$-+H.,+-%0I--G+$$I-\+G$IG.+$W0%+,%.I<%0;I"$+KI;9.,+<+IG,.,#I,-!CK0-+<$

%0K.$.,%+GWG+%.,W"%$.,%0%9+$Q$%+K$%0[+9I\+.,I:IQ%0%9+I-\I,%I#+0HI,I%%I;7+GU].,;0GW0GI%+.,

.%+K.,'KIQ[+%00_

8M+$;G.[+$%IHH.,#G+Y".G+K+,%$H0G!C-+\+<0WK+,%'KI,I#+K+,%'I,-$"WW0G%%0.,;<"-++-";I%.0,'

;+G%.H.;I%.0,'I,-%0$"$%I.,$"[b+;%KI%%+GI;;G+-.%I%.0,]KIQ[+;0\+G+-I<G+I-Q.,_
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Cogent, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul Kim, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2. That the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

 

This certification has not been,and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

 

Date: March 1, 2007 

 

                    /s/    PAULKIM                    

**Paul Kim**

***Chief Financial Officer***
#### Bridget Williams *v.*Timothy Daley.

Landlord and Tenant — Change of Relation of Tenant to Purchaser — Burden of Proof.

Appellant entered upon the possession of the premises as tenant of appellee, and for some time paid him rent for the same at an agreed rate per month. The burden of proof is on her to establish that she had changed her relation as tenant to that of purchaser.

APPEAL FROM FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT.

January 6, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

It is conceded that appellant entered upon the possession of the premises in controversy as the tenant of appellee, that she agreed to and for some time did pay him rent for the same at an agreed rate per month.

There is some- evidence of statements and admissions upon th part of appellee conducing to establish a subsequent sale of the property to Mrs. Williams, and also the payment by her to him of considerable amounts of money. This testimony is, however, vague and unsatisfactory, and the witnesses by whom the greater portion of it is detailed manifest a very decided interest in the success of this appellant in this litigation. One of them, and a very important one, the son of appellant, state facts which indicate that he knew nothing about the sale to his mother, more than two years after it is claimed to have been made. The evidence of appellee shows that Mrs. Williams recognized him as *345her landlord upon various occasions, and almost up to the time when this litigation commenced. She seems to have admitted this fact when testifying as a witness on the trial of a suit of forcible detainer. The amount of money proved to have been paid to appellee is no more than would be sufficient to satisfy the rent that has accrued on the property at the rate of twelve dollars and fifty cents per month ($12.50). The burden of proof was upon appellant to establish .that she had changed her relation as tenant to that of purchaser. Leaving out of view the payment by appellee of taxes, and insurance premiums on the property, we do not think the testimony in the record preponderates in favor of this conclusion.

*Houston &Mulligan and Webster, for appellaAtí.*

*Breckenridge & Thornton, for appellee.*

The judgment of the circuit court *affirmed.*
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 3

Authorizing the Speaker to appoint a committee to notify the President

of the assembly of the Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 7, 1997

Mr. ARMEY submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Authorizing the Speaker to appoint a committee to notify

the President of the assembly of the Congress.

Resolved, That a committee of two Members be

appointed by the Speaker on the part of the House of

Representatives to join with a committee on the part of the

Senate to notify the President of the United States that a

quorum of each house has assembled and Congress is ready

to receive any communication that he may be pleased to

make.

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

WHAM-O HOLDING, LTD. and 

INTERSPORT CORP. d/b/a WHAM-O,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”,

Defendants.

Civil Action No.: 1:20-cv-03761

Judge Manish S. Shah

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey T. Gilbert

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby files this Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal, without prejudice, as to the following Defendant(s) identified on Schedule A of the 

Complaint:

NO. DEFENDANT

345 PickTek

339 Newland

276 GeekHall

249 Cheer Maker

153 wenxinkeji

562 Zhejiang Jinyuan Machinery Co., Ltd.

252 ciweixiaohuo

229 ALOPEX

232 AUSUKY

17 20yes4buy

18 2ndheaven2013

117 niceol

38 boysgirlsnew-04

39 boysgirlsnew-05

Case: 1:20-cv-03761 Document #: 40 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:7830
DATED: September 7, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt (Bar No. 6207971)

Keith Vogt, Ltd.

111 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1700

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Telephone: 312-675-6079

E-mail: keith@vogtip.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case: 1:20-cv-03761 Document #: 40 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:7831
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document was electronically filed on September 7, 2020 with the Clerk of the Court using the 

CM/ECF system, which will automatically send an email notification of such filing to all registered 

attorneys of record.

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt

Case: 1:20-cv-03761 Document #: 40 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:7832
This 5G NR Sidelink Link-Level Simulator (LLS) is developed by National Institute Standards and Technology (NIST) developers by leveraging the MATLAB-based Vienna 5G NR Link Level Simulator. It requires the Vienna 5G NR LLS Release 1.2, licensed by Institute of Telecommunications TU-Wien and available at https://www.tuwien.at/etit/tc/en/vienna-simulators/vienna-5g-simulators/. It also requires MATLAB version 2021b with the following toolboxes: communication toolbox, 5G tool-box, and signal blocks. 

The Sidelink simulator is released as a patch file to the Vienna 5G LLS v1.2. Once the original Vienna LLS is downloaded, the patch file can be installed using any common patch application method. The section "Installation Guide" in the user manual (5G_sidelink_LLS_userManual.pdf) provides details on two common methods.

This software will be actively maintained.

Read the LICENSE.md for information on NIST license, and user manual 5G_sidelink_LLS_userManual.pdf on how to use the simulator.

Disclaimer:
Certain commercial software are identified through the project code and documentation in order to specify the experimental procedure adequately.  Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by NIST, nor is it intended to imply that the materials or equipment identified are necessarily the best available for the purpose.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                        |                                                                               |                                  |
|---------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
| Date: November                14, 2005 | By:                                                                      | /s/ Serge                Lacroix |
|                                        |                                                                                    |
|                                        | Serge                  LacroixChairman of the Board and                  President |

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

JOHN DOE, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

THE INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, 

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, 

PARTNERSHIPS, AND 

UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS 

IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A HERETO, 

 Defendants. 

 Case No. 20-cv-3558 

 Judge 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

 Plaintiff John Doe (“Plaintiff”) files this Motion requesting leave to file the following 

documents under seal: (1) Plaintiff’s trademark registration certificates (Exhibit 1 to the 

Complaint); (2) Plaintiff’s copyright registration certificates (Exhibit 2 to the Complaint); (3) 

Plaintiff’s Schedule A attached to the Complaint, which identifies and includes a list of the 

Defendant Domain Names, domain name registration information, and Online Marketplace 

Accounts; and (4) screenshot printouts showing the active Defendant Internet Stores (Exhibit 3 

to the Declaration of John Doe). 

 In this action, Plaintiff is requesting temporary ex parte relief based on an action for 

trademark counterfeiting. Sealing this portion of the file is necessary to prevent the Defendants 

from learning of these proceedings prior to the execution of the temporary restraining order. If 

Defendants were to learn of these proceedings prematurely, the likely result would be the 

destruction of relevant documentary evidence and the hiding or transferring of assets to foreign 
2

jurisdictions, which would frustrate the purpose of the underlying law and would interfere with 

this Court’s power to grant relief. Once the Amended Complaint is filed, the Temporary 

Restraining Order has been served on the relevant parties and the requested actions are taken, 

Plaintiff will move to unseal these documents.  

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: June 18, 2020 

 By: s/Michael A. Hierl _ 

 Michael A. Hierl (Bar No. 3128021) 

 William B. Kalbac (Bar No. 6301771) 

 Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. 

 Three First National Plaza 

 70 W. Madison Street, Suite 4000 

 Chicago, Illinois 60602 

 (312) 580-0100 Telephone 

 (312) 580-1994 Facsimile 

 mhierl@hsplegal.com 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 John Doe 
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 The undersigned attorney hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

Motion for Leave to File Under Seal was filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court and 

served on all counsel of record and interested parties via the CM/ECF system on June 18, 2020. 

 

s/Michael A. Hierl