Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 217 / Monday, November 10, 2014 / Notices 66747 

(i) There is no significant hazards 

consideration; 

(ii) There is no significant change in 

the types or significant increase in the 

amounts of any effluents that may be 

released offsite; 

(iii) There is no significant increase in 

individual or cumulative public or 

occupational radiation exposure; 

(iv) There is no significant 

construction impact; 

(v) There is no significant increase in 

the potential for or consequences from 

radiological accidents; and 

(vi) The requirements from which an 

exemption is sought involve: 

(A) Recordkeeping requirements; 

(B) Reporting requirements; 

(C) Inspection or surveillance 

requirements; 

(D) Equipment servicing or 

maintenance scheduling requirements; 

(E) Education, training, experience, 

qualification, requalification or other 

employment suitability requirements; 

(F) Safeguard plans, and materials 

control and accounting inventory 

scheduling requirements; 

(G) Scheduling requirements; 

(H) Surety, insurance or indemnity 

requirements; or 

(I) Other requirements of an 

administrative, managerial, or 

organizational nature. 

The requirements from which this 

exemption is sought involve only ‘‘(B) 

Reporting requirements’’ or ‘‘(G) 

Scheduling requirements’’ of those 

required by 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi). 

The NRC staff’s determination that 

each of the applicable criteria for this 

categorical exclusion is met as follows: 

I. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(i): There is no 

significant hazards consideration. 

Staff Analysis: The criteria for 

determining if an exemption involves a 

significant hazards consideration are 

found in 10 CFR 50.92. The proposed 

action involves only a schedule change 

regarding the submission of an update 

to the application for which the 

licensing review has been suspended. 

Therefore, there are no significant 

hazard considerations because granting 

the proposed exemption would not: 

(1) Involve a significant increase in 

the probability or consequences of an 

accident previously evaluated; or 

(2) Create the possibility of a new or 

different kind of accident from any 

accident previously evaluated; or 

(3) Involve a significant reduction in 

a margin of safety. 

II. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(ii): There is no 

significant change in the types or 

significant increase in the amounts of 

any effluents that may be released 

offsite. 

Staff Analysis: The proposed action 

involves only a schedule change, which 

is administrative in nature, and does not 

involve any changes in the types or 

significant increase in the amounts of 

effluents that may be released offsite. 

III. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(iii): There is 

no significant increase in individual or 

cumulative public or occupational 

radiation exposure. 

Staff Analysis: Since the proposed 

action involves only a schedule change, 

which is administrative in nature, it 

does not contribute to any significant 

increase in occupational or public 

radiation exposure. 

IV. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(iv): There is 

no significant construction impact. 

Staff Analysis: The proposed action 

involves only a schedule change, which 

is administrative in nature. The 

application review is suspended until 

further notice, and there is no 

consideration of any construction at this 

time; therefore, the proposed action 

does not involve any construction 

impact. 

V. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(v): There is no 

significant increase in the potential for 

or consequences from radiological 

accidents. 

Staff Analysis: The proposed action 

involves only a schedule change which 

is administrative in nature and does not 

impact the probability or consequences 

of accidents. 

VI. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi): The 

requirements from which this 

exemption is sought involve only ‘‘(B) 

Reporting requirements’’ or ‘‘(G) 

Scheduling requirements.’’ 

Staff Analysis: The exemption request 

involves requirements in both of these 

categories because it involves 

submitting an updated COL application, 

and also relates to the schedule for 

submitting COL application updates to 

the NRC. 

III. Conclusion 

Accordingly, the Commission has 

determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 

50.12(a), the exemption is authorized by 

law, will not present an undue risk to 

the public health and safety, and is 

consistent with the common defense 

and security. Also, special 

circumstances as described in 10 CFR 

50.12(a)(2)(ii) are present. Therefore, the 

Commission hereby grants Ameren a 

one-time exemption from the 

requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, 

Appendix E, Section I.5 pertaining to 

the Callaway, Unit 2, COL application to 

allow submittal of the revised COL 

application that complies with the new 

EP rules prior to any request to the NRC 

to resume the review, and in any event, 

no later than December 31, 2015. 

Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22, the 

Commission has determined that the 

exemption request meets the applicable 

categorical exclusion criteria set forth in 

10 CFR 51.22(c)(25), and the granting of 

this exemption will not have a 

significant effect on the quality of the 

human environment. 

This exemption is effective upon 

issuance. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 31st day 

of October 2014. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Mark Delligatti, 

Deputy Director, Division of New Reactor 

Licensing, Office of New Reactors. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26645 Filed 11–7–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket No. 52–037; NRC–2008–0556] 

Ameren Missouri; Combined License 

Application for Callaway Plant, Unit 2 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Exemption; issuance. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) is issuing an 

exemption in a response to an August 7, 

2014, letter from Ameren Missouri, 

which requested an exemption from 

Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) 

updates included in their Combined 

License (COL) application. The NRC 

staff reviewed this request and 

determined that it is appropriate to 

grant the exemption, but stipulated that 

the updates to the FSAR must be 

submitted prior to, or coincident with, 

the resumption of the COL application 

review or by December 31, 2015, 

whichever comes first. 

DATES: The exemption is effective on 

November 10, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID 

NRC–2008–0556 when contacting the 

NRC about the availability of 

information regarding this document. 

You may obtain publicly-available 

information related to this action by the 

following methods: 

• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov and search 

for Docket ID NRC–2008–0556. Address 

questions about NRC dockets to Carol 

Gallagher; telephone: 301–287–3422; 

email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For 

technical questions, contact the 

individual listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 

document. 

• NRC’s Agencywide Documents 

Access and Management System 

(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly 

available documents online in the 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
66748 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 217 / Monday, November 10, 2014 / Notices 

ADAMS Public Documents collection at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/

adams.html. To begin the search, select 

‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then 

select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS 

Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, 

please contact the NRC’s Public 

Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 

1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by 

email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. 

• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and 

purchase copies of public documents at 

the NRC PDR, Room O1–F21, One 

White Flint North, 11555 Rockville 

Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Prosanta Chowdhury, Office of New 

Reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, Washington, DC 20555– 

0001; telephone: 301–415–1647; email: 

Prosanta.Chowdhury@nrc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

On July 24, 2008, Union Electric 

Company, doing business as Ameren 

UE, submitted to the NRC a COL 

Application for a single unit of AREVA 

NP’s U.S. Evolutionary Power Reactor 

(U.S. EPR) (ADAMS Accession No. 

ML082140630) in accordance with the 

requirements in part 52, Section C of 

Title 10 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations (10 CFR), ‘‘Licenses, 

Certifications, and Approvals for 

Nuclear Power Plants.’’ This reactor is 

to be identified as Callaway Plant 

(Callaway), Unit 2, and located at the 

current Callaway County, Missouri site 

of the Callaway Power Plant. The 

Callaway, Unit 2, COL application is 

based upon and linked to the U.S. EPR 

reference COL (RCOL) application for 

UniStar’s Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power 

Plant, Unit 3 (CCNPP3). The NRC 

docketed the Callaway, Unit 2, COL 

application on December 12, 2008. On 

February 25, 2009, Ameren submitted 

Revision 1 to the COL application, 

including updates to the Final Safety 

Analysis Report (FSAR) (ADAMS 

Accession No. ML090710444). In its 

letter to the NRC dated April 28, 2009, 

Ameren informed the NRC that it was 

suspending its efforts to build a nuclear 

power plant in Missouri (ADAMS 

Accession No. ML091210159). 

Subsequently, by letter dated June 23, 

2009, Ameren requested the NRC to 

suspend all review activities relating to 

the Callaway, Unit 2, COL application 

(ADAMS Accession No. ML091750988). 

The NRC informed Ameren by letter 

dated June 29, 2009, that it had 

suspended all review activities relating 

to the Callaway, Unit 2, COL 

application. By letter to the NRC dated 

October 15, 2012, Ameren requested a 

one-time exemption from the 10 CFR 

50.71(e)(3)(iii) requirements to submit 

the scheduled 2012 and 2013 COL 

application FSAR updates, and 

proposed for approval of a new 

submittal deadline of December 31, 

2014, for the next FSAR update. The 

NRC granted the exemption as described 

in Federal Register Notice (FRN) 77 FR 

76539 (December 28, 2012). The NRC is 

currently performing a detailed review 

of the CCNPP3 RCOL application, as 

well as AREVA NP’s application for 

design certification of the U.S. EPR. 

II. Request/Action 

The regulations specified in 10 CFR 

50.71(e)(3)(iii), require that an applicant 

for a COL under 10 CFR Part 52 shall, 

during the period from docketing of a 

COL application until the Commission 

makes a finding under 10 CFR 52.103(g) 

pertaining to facility operation, submit 

an annual update to the application’s 

FSAR, which is a part of the 

application. 

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii), 

the next annual update of the Callaway, 

Unit 2, COL application FSAR would be 

due on or before December 31, 2014. By 

letter to the NRC dated August 7, 2014, 

Ameren requested a one-time exemption 

from the 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) 

requirements to submit the scheduled 

2014 COL application FSAR update, 

and proposed for approval of a new 

submittal deadline of December 31, 

2016, for the next FSAR update 

(ADAMS Accession Number 

ML14234A253). 

Ameren’s requested exemption is a 

one-time schedule change from the 

requirements of 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii). 

The exemption, as requested, would 

allow Ameren to submit the next FSAR 

update at a later date, but still in 

advance of NRC’s reinstating its review 

of the application and in any event, by 

December 31, 2016. The current FSAR 

update schedule could not be changed, 

absent the exemption. Ameren 

requested the exemption by letter dated 

August 7, 2014. 

III. Discussion 

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the NRC 

may, upon application by any interested 

person or upon its own initiative, grant 

exemptions from the requirements of 10 

CFR Part 50, including Section 

50.71(e)(3)(iii) when: (1) The 

exemptions are authorized by law, will 

not present an undue risk to public 

health or safety, and are consistent with 

the common defense and security; and 

(2) special circumstances are present. As 

relevant to the requested exemption, 

special circumstances exist if: (1) 

‘‘Application of the regulation in the 

particular circumstances would not 

serve the underlying purpose of the rule 

or is not necessary to achieve the 

underlying purpose of the rule’’ (10 CFR 

50.12(a)(2)(ii)); or (2) ‘‘The exemption 

would provide only temporary relief 

from the applicable regulation and the 

licensee or applicant has made good 

faith efforts to comply with the 

regulation’’ (10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(v)). 

The review of the Callaway, Unit 2, 

COL application FSAR has been 

suspended since June 29, 2009. Since 

the COL application FSAR is directly 

linked to the CCNPP3 RCOL 

application, many changes in the RCOL 

application require an associated change 

to the COL application FSAR and, 

because the NRC review of the COL 

application is suspended, the updates to 

the FSAR will not be reviewed by the 

NRC staff until the Callaway, Unit 2, 

COL application review is resumed. 

Thus, the optimum time to prepare a 

revision to the COL application FSAR is 

sometime prior to Ameren requesting 

the NRC to resume its review. To 

prepare and submit a COL application 

FSAR update when the review remains 

suspended and in the absence of any 

decision by Ameren to request the NRC 

to resume the review would require 

Ameren to spend significant time and 

effort and would be of no value, 

particularly due to the fact that the 

RCOL application and the U.S. EPR 

FSAR are still undergoing periodic 

revisions and updates. Furthermore, the 

adjudicatory proceedings related to the 

Callaway, Unit 2, COL application were 

terminated by the Atomic Safety and 

Licensing Board (ASLB) after 

agreements were made between 

Ameren, the NRC, and the petitioners 

for intervention, as documented in 

‘‘Amerenue (Callaway Plant, Unit 2), 

LBP–09–23 (2009)’’ (ADAMS Accession 

No. ML092400189). Ameren commits to 

submit the next FSAR update prior to 

any request to the NRC to resume 

review of the COL application and, in 

any event, by December 31, 2016. 

Ameren would need to identify all 

committed changes to the RCOL 

application since the last revisions to 

the RCOL application and the U.S. EPR 

FSAR in order to prepare a COL 

application FSAR revision that 

accurately and completely reflects the 

committed changes to the RCOL 

application as well as the U.S. EPR 

FSAR. 

The requested one-time exemption to 

defer submittal of the next update to the 

Callaway, Unit 2, COL application 

FSAR would provide only temporary 

relief from the regulations of 10 CFR 

50.71(e)(3)(iii). Ameren has made good 

faith efforts to comply with 10 CFR 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 217 / Monday, November 10, 2014 / Notices 66749 

50.71(e)(3)(iii) by submitting Revision 1 

to the COL application dated February 

25, 2009, prior to requesting the review 

suspension. Revision 1 incorporated 

information provided in prior 

supplements and standardized language 

with the RCOL application. 

Authorized by Law 

The exemption is a one-time schedule 

exemption from the requirements of 10 

CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii). The exemption, as 

requested, would allow Ameren to 

submit the next Callaway Unit 2 COL 

application FSAR update on or before 

December 31, 2016, in lieu of the 

required scheduled submittal on or 

before December 31, 2014. As stated 

above, 10 CFR 50.12 allows the NRC to 

grant exemptions. The NRC staff has 

determined that granting Ameren a onetime exemption from the requirements 

of 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) with updates 

to the FSAR to be submitted on or 

before December 31, 2015, will provide 

only temporary relief from this 

regulation and will not result in a 

violation of the Atomic Energy Act of 

1954, as amended, or NRC regulations. 

Therefore, the exemption is authorized 

by law. 

No Undue Risk to Public Health and 

Safety 

The underlying purpose of 10 CFR 

50.71(e)(3)(iii) is to provide for a timely 

and comprehensive update of the FSAR 

associated with a COL application in 

order to support an effective and 

efficient review by the NRC staff and 

issuance of the NRC staff’s safety 

evaluation report. The requested 

exemption is solely administrative in 

nature, in that it pertains to the 

schedule for submittal to the NRC of 

revisions to an application under 10 

CFR Part 52, for which a license has not 

been granted. In addition, since the 

review of the application has been 

suspended, any update to the 

application submitted by Ameren will 

not be reviewed by the NRC at this time. 

Based on the nature of the requested 

exemption as described above, no new 

accident precursors are created by the 

exemption; thus, neither the probability, 

nor the consequences of postulated 

accidents are increased. Therefore, there 

is no undue risk to public health and 

safety. 

Consistent With Common Defense and 

Security 

The exemption would allow Ameren 

to submit the next FSAR update prior to 

requesting the NRC to resume the 

review and, in any event, on or before 

December 31, 2015. This schedule 

change has no relation to security 

issues. Therefore, the common defense 

and security is not impacted by this 

exemption. 

Special Circumstances 

Special circumstances, in accordance 

with 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2), are present 

whenever: (1) ‘‘Application of the 

regulation in the particular 

circumstances would not serve the 

underlying purpose of the rule or is not 

necessary to achieve the underlying 

purpose of the rule’’ (10 CFR 

50.12(a)(2)(ii)); or (2) ‘‘The exemption 

would provide only temporary relief 

from the applicable regulation and the 

licensee or applicant has made good 

faith efforts to comply with the 

regulation’’ (10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(v)). 

The underlying purpose of 10 CFR 

50.71(e)(3)(iii) is to provide for a timely 

and comprehensive update of the FSAR 

associated with a COL application in 

order to support an effective and 

efficient review by the NRC staff and 

issuance of the NRC staff’s safety 

evaluation report. As discussed above, 

the requested one-time exemption is 

solely administrative in nature, in that 

it pertains to a one-time schedule 

change for submittal of revisions to an 

application under 10 CFR Part 52, for 

which a license has not been granted. 

The requested one-time exemption will 

permit Ameren time to carefully review 

the most recent revisions of the RCOL 

application and the U.S. EPR FSAR, and 

fully incorporate these revisions into a 

comprehensive update of the FSAR 

associated with the Callaway, Unit 2, 

COL application. This one-time 

exemption will support the NRC staff’s 

effective and efficient review of the COL 

application when resumed, as well as 

issuance of the safety evaluation report, 

and therefore does not affect the 

underlying purpose of 10 CFR 

50.71(e)(3)(iii). Under the circumstances 

that Ameren has suspended its pursuit 

of the COL, the NRC has suspended its 

review of the application, and the 

adjudicatory proceedings have been 

terminated by ASLB, application of 10 

CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) would result in 

Ameren spending significant time and 

effort in incorporating changes made to 

the RCOL application as well as the U.S. 

EPR FSAR into the Callaway, Unit 2, 

COL application, but would not achieve 

the underlying purpose of that rule. 

Granting a one-time exemption from 10 

CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) would provide only 

temporary relief. Ameren has made 

good faith efforts to comply with the 

regulation. Therefore, the special 

circumstances required by 10 CFR 50.12 

(a)(2) for the granting of an exemption 

from 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) exist. 

Eligibility for Categorical Exclusion 

From Environmental Review 

With respect to the exemption’s 

impact on the quality of the human 

environment, the NRC has determined 

that this specific exemption request is 

eligible for categorical exclusion as 

identified in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25). Under 

10 CFR 51.22(c)(25), granting of an 

exemption from the requirements of any 

regulation of 10 CFR Chapter 1 (which 

includes 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii)) is an 

action that is a categorical exclusion, 

provided that: 

(i) There is no significant hazards 

consideration; 

(ii) There is no significant change in 

the types or significant increase in the 

amounts of any effluents that may be 

released offsite; 

(iii) There is no significant increase in 

individual or cumulative public or 

occupational radiation exposure; 

(iv) There is no significant 

construction impact; 

(v) There is no significant increase in 

the potential for or consequences from 

radiological accidents; and 

(vi) The requirements from which an 

exemption is sought involve: 

(A) Recordkeeping requirements; 

(B) Reporting requirements; 

(C) Inspection or surveillance 

requirements; 

(D) Equipment servicing or 

maintenance scheduling requirements; 

(E) Education, training, experience, 

qualification, requalification or other 

employment suitability requirements; 

(F) Safeguard plans, and materials 

control and accounting inventory 

scheduling requirements; 

(G) Scheduling requirements; 

(H) Surety, insurance or indemnity 

requirements; or 

(I) Other requirements of an 

administrative, managerial, or 

organizational nature. 

The requirements from which this 

exemption is sought involve only ‘‘(B) 

Reporting requirements’’ or ‘‘(G) 

Scheduling requirements’’ of those 

required by 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi). 

The NRC staff’s determination that 

each of the applicable criteria for this 

categorical exclusion is met as follows: 

I. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(i): There is no 

significant hazards consideration. 

Staff Analysis: The criteria for 

determining if an exemption involves a 

significant hazards consideration are 

found in 10 CFR 50.92. The proposed 

action involves only a schedule change 

regarding the submission of an update 

to the application for which the 

licensing review has been suspended. 

Therefore, there is no significant hazard 

consideration because granting the 

proposed exemption would not: 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
66750 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 217 / Monday, November 10, 2014 / Notices 

(1) Involve a significant increase in 

the probability or consequences of an 

accident previously evaluated; or 

(2) Create the possibility of a new or 

different kind of accident from any 

accident previously evaluated; or 

(3) Involve a significant reduction in 

a margin of safety. 

II. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(ii): There is no 

significant change in the types or 

significant increase in the amounts of 

any effluents that may be released 

offsite. 

Staff Analysis: The proposed action 

involves only a schedule change, which 

is administrative in nature, and does not 

involve any changes in the types or 

significant increase in the amounts of 

effluents that may be released offsite. 

III. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(iii): There is 

no significant increase in individual or 

cumulative public or occupational 

radiation exposure. 

Staff Analysis: Since the proposed 

action involves only a schedule change, 

which is administrative in nature, it 

does not contribute to any significant 

increase in occupational or public 

radiation exposure. 

IV. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(iv): There is 

no significant construction impact. 

Staff Analysis: The proposed action 

involves only a schedule change, which 

is administrative in nature. The 

application review is suspended until 

further notice, and there is no 

consideration of any construction at this 

time; therefore, the proposed action 

does not involve any construction 

impact. 

V. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(v): There is no 

significant increase in the potential for 

or consequences from radiological 

accidents. 

Staff Analysis: The proposed action 

involves only a schedule change which 

is administrative in nature and does not 

impact the probability or consequences 

of accidents. 

VI. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi): The 

requirements from which this 

exemption is sought involve only ‘‘(B) 

Reporting requirements’’ or ‘‘(G) 

Scheduling requirements.’’ 

Staff Analysis: The exemption request 

involves requirements in both of these 

categories because it involves 

submitting an updated FSAR by 

Ameren, and also relates to the schedule 

for submitting FSAR updates to the 

NRC. 

IV. Conclusion 

The NRC has determined that, 

pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the 

exemption is authorized by law, will not 

present an undue risk to the public 

health and safety, and is consistent with 

the common defense and security. Also, 

special circumstances as described in 10 

CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii) and (v) are present. 

Therefore, the NRC hereby grants 

Ameren a one-time exemption from the 

requirements of 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) 

pertaining to the Callaway, Unit 2, COL 

application to allow submittal of the 

next FSAR update prior to any request 

to the NRC to resume the review, and 

in any event, no later than December 31, 

2015. 

Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22, the NRC 

has determined that the exemption 

request meets the applicable categorical 

exclusion criteria set forth in 10 CFR 

51.22(c)(25), and the granting of this 

exemption will not have a significant 

effect on the quality of the human 

environment. 

This exemption is effective upon 

issuance. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 31st day 

of October 2014. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Mark Delligatti, 

Deputy Director, Division of New Reactor 

Licensing, Office of New Reactors. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26644 Filed 11–7–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[EA–14–113; NRC–2014–0242] 

In the Matter of Kruger Technologies, 

Inc. 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Confirmatory order; issuance. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) is issuing a 

confirmatory order to Kruger 

Technologies, Inc., (KTI) confirming 

agreements reached in an Alternative 

Dispute Resolution Session held on 

September 3, 2014. As part of the 

agreement, KTI will take a number of 

actions, including: Revising the 

company-wide policy to describe 

implementation of NRC safety and 

security requirements for portable 

gauges; ensuring all authorized gauge 

users are trained initially and annually 

on the revised company-wide policy; 

increasing management oversight by 

establishing a process to periodically 

conduct field inspections; and 

providing Radiation Safety Officer 

training for an additional authorized 

gauge user. KTI is also required to notify 

the NRC periodically of the status of its 

efforts. 

DATES: Effective Date: November 28, 

2014. 

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID 

NRC–2014–0242 when contacting the 

NRC about the availability of 

information regarding this document. 

You may obtain publicly-available 

information related to this action by the 

following methods: 

• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov and search 

for Docket ID NRC–2014–0242. Address 

questions about NRC dockets to Carol 

Gallagher; telephone: 301–287–3422; 

email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For 

questions about this Order, contact the 

individual listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 

document. 

• NRC’s Agencywide Documents 

Access and Management System 

(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly 

available documents online in the NRC 

Library at http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html. To begin the search, 

select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and 

then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS 

Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, 

please contact the NRC’s Public 

Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 

1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by 

email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The 

ADAMS accession number for each 

document referenced in this document 

(if that document is available in 

ADAMS) is provided the first time that 

a document is referenced. 

• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and 

purchase copies of public documents at 

the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One 

White Flint North, 11555 Rockville 

Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patricia Lougheed, Region III, U.S. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Lisle, 

Illinois 60532; telephone: 630 810–4376, 

email: Patricia.Lougheed@nrc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of 

the Order is attached. 

Dated at Lisle, Illinois this 28th day of 

October, 2014. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Darrell J. Roberts, 

Deputy Regional Administrator. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR 

REGULATORY COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Kruger Technologies, Inc. 

Lenexa, Kansas 

Docket No. 030–38660 

License No. 15–35082–01 

EA–14–113 

Confirmatory Order Modifying License 

I 

Kruger Technologies, Inc., (KTI or 

Licensee) is the holder of Materials 

License No. 15–35082–01 issued by the 

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES