Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 213 / Tuesday, November 4, 2014 / Notices 65423 

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

products and the use, cost, or 

availability of major inputs into 

production); and factors related to the 

ability to shift supply among different 

national markets (including barriers to 

importation in foreign markets or 

changes in market demand abroad). 

Demand conditions to consider include 

end uses and applications; the existence 

and availability of substitute products; 

and the level of competition among the 

Domestic Like Product produced in the 

United States, Subject Merchandise 

produced in the Subject Country, and 

such merchandise from other countries. 

(13) (Optional) A statement of 

whether you agree with the above 

definitions of the Domestic Like Product 

and Domestic Industry; if you disagree 

with either or both of these definitions, 

please explain why and provide 

alternative definitions. 

Authority: This proceeding is being 

conducted under authority of Title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 

pursuant to section 207.61 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

Issued: October 29, 2014. 

By order of the Commission. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26099 Filed 11–3–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–1012 (Second 

Review)] 

Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From 

Vietnam 

Determination 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year review, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) 

determines, pursuant to section 751(c) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)), that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

frozen fish fillets from Vietnam would 

be likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury to an 

industry in the United States within a 

reasonably foreseeable time. 

Background 

The Commission instituted this 

review on June 2, 2014 (79 FR 31345) 

and determined on September 5, 2014, 

that it would conduct an expedited 

review (79 FR 56826). 

The Commission completed and filed 

its determination in this review on 

October 30, 2014. The views of the 

Commission are contained in USITC 

Publication 4498 (October 2014), 

entitled Certain Frozen Fish Fillets 

FSrom Vietnam: Investigation No. 731– 

TA–1012 (Second Review). 

Issued: October 30, 2014. 

By order of the Commission. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26157 Filed 11–3–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–915] 

Certain Set-Top Boxes, Gateways, 

Bridges, and Adapters and 

Components Thereof; Commission 

Determination Not To Review an Initial 

Determination Granting Complainants’ 

Unopposed Motion To Terminate the 

Investigation on the Basis of 

Settlement; Termination of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review the presiding administrative law 

judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination 

(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 17) granting the 

unopposed motion of complainants 

ViXS Systems, Inc., of Toronto, Ontario, 

Canada and ViXS USA, Inc. of Austin, 

Texas (collectively ‘‘ViXS’’) to terminate 

the above-referenced investigation as to 

respondent Entropic Communications, 

Inc. of San Diego, California 

(‘‘Entropic’’) on the basis of a settlement 

agreement. The investigation is 

terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Megan M. Valentine, Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2301. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http://

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on May 21, 2014, based on a Complaint 

filed by ViXS, as supplemented and 

amended. 79 FR 29204 (May 21, 2014). 

The Complaint alleges violations of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 

337’’), in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

and the sale within the United States 

after importation of certain set-top 

boxes, gateways, bridges, and adapters 

and components thereof by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 7,301,900; 7,099,951; 

7,200,855; and 7,406,598. The 

Complaint further alleges the existence 

of a domestic industry. The 

Commission’s Notice of Investigation 

named as respondents Entropic; 

DirectTV, LLC of El Segundo, California 

(‘‘DirectTV’’); Wistron NeWeb 

Corporation of Hsinchu, Taiwan and 

Winstron Corporation of Taipei Hsien, 

Taiwan (collectively ‘‘Wistron’’); and 

CyberTAN Technology, Inc. of Hsinchu, 

Taiwan (‘‘CyberTAN’’). The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations was also 

named as a party to the investigation. 

The Commission later terminated the 

investigation with respect to certain 

asserted claims of the patents-in-suit, 

thus limiting the investigation to 

products incorporating Entropic chips 

and, in effect, terminating the 

investigation with respect to 

respondents DirectTV, Wistron, and 

CyberTAN. Notice (Aug. 25, 2014); 

Order No. 9 (Aug. 15, 2014). 

On September 15, 2014, ViXS filed a 

motion to terminate this investigation 

based on a settlement agreement 

between ViXS and Entropic. The motion 

stated that the respondents do not 

oppose the motion. On September 29, 

2014, the Commission investigative 

attorney (Mr. Taylor) filed a response in 

support of the motion. 

On October 7, 2014, the ALJ issued 

the subject ID granting ViXS’s motion 

for termination of the investigation. The 

ALJ found that the joint motion 

complied with the requirements of 

section 210.21(b)(1) of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.21(b)(1)) and that there are no 

extraordinary circumstances that would 

prevent the requested terminations. The 

ALJ also found that granting the motion 


rmajette on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
65424 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 213 / Tuesday, November 4, 2014 / Notices 

would not be contrary to the public 

interest. 

No petitions for review of the subject 

ID were filed. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Part 

210). 

Issued: October 30, 2014. 

By order of the Commission. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26158 Filed 11–3–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed 

Consent Decree Under the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act 

On October 28, 2014, the Department 

of Justice lodged a proposed Consent 

Decree with the United States District 

Court for the District of Connecticut in 

the lawsuit entitled United States v. City 

of Derby, Connecticut, Civil Action No. 

3:14–cv–01594–WWE. 

The United States filed this lawsuit 

under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 

U.S.C. 9601, et seq., seeking to recover 

costs incurred in performing a removal 

action at the O’Sullivan’s Island 

Superfund Site in the City of Derby, 

Connecticut. Under the proposed 

ability-to-pay Consent Decree, the City 

will pay $675,000.00 to EPA. The 

United States covenants not to sue the 

City under Section 107 of CERCLA to 

recover past response costs. 

The publication of this notice opens 

a period for public comment on the 

proposed Consent Decree. Comments 

should be addressed to the Assistant 

Attorney General, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division and should 

refer to United States v. City of Derby, 

Connecticut, D.J. Ref. No. 90–11–3– 

10354. All comments must be submitted 

no later than thirty (30) days after the 

publication date of this notice. 

Comments may be submitted either by 

email or by mail: 

To submit 

comments: Send them to: 

By email ....... pubcomment-ees.enrd@

usdoj.gov. 

To submit 

comments: Send them to: 

By mail ......... Assistant Attorney General, 

U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. 

Box 7611, Washington, DC 

20044–7611. 

During the public comment period, 

the Consent Decree may be examined 

and downloaded at this Justice 

Department Web site: http://

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_

Decrees.html. We will provide a paper 

copy of the Consent Decree upon 

written request and payment of 

reproduction costs. Please mail your 

request and payment to: Consent Decree 

Library, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 

7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611. 

Please enclose a check or money order 

for $6.00 (25 cents per page 

reproduction cost) payable to the United 

States Treasury. 

Robert E. Maher Jr., 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26180 Filed 11–3–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993; National Spectrum 

Consortium 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

September 24, 2014, pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), 

National Spectrum Consortium (‘‘NSC’’) 

has filed written notifications 

simultaneously with the Attorney 

General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing (1) the identities 

of the parties to the venture and (2) the 

nature and objectives of the venture. 

The notifications were filed for the 

purpose of invoking the Act’s provisions 

limiting the recovery of antitrust 

plaintiffs to actual damages under 

specified circumstances. 

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, 

the identities of the parties to the 

venture are: ADS Corporation, 

Arlington, VA; AEA, Inc., Anacortes, 

WA; ATDI Government Services, LLC, 

Fairfax, VA; BAE Systems, Nashua, NH; 

Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, 

PA; Cognitive Radio Technologies, LLC, 

Lynchburg, VA; Comsearch, Warren, RI; 

Darkblade Systems Corporation, 

Stafford, VA; Disney/ABC TV Group, 

New York, NY; Draper Laboratory, 

Cambridge, MA; Eigen Wireless, Liberty 

Lake, WA; Exelis, Inc., McLean, VA; 

Federated Wireless, Boston, MA; 

Georgia Tech Applied Research 

Corporation, Atlanta, GA; Gonzaga 

University, Spokane, WA; Honeywell, 

Morristown, NJ; Hughes Network 

Systems, Gaithersburg, MD; ICF 

International, Fairfax, VA; Innovative 

Solutions Consortium, Leesburg, VA; 

Lockheed Martin Corporation, 

Washington, DC; Monterey Consultants, 

Inc., Dayton, OH; Nokia Networks, 

Chicago, IL; Northrop Grumman 

Corporation, Falls Church, VA; Nouveau 

Innovation Alliance, LLC, Dayton, OH; 

Oceus Networks, Reston, VA; Peha 

Consulting, Washington, DC; Raytheon 

BBN Technologies, Cambridge, MA; 

Roberson and Associates, LLC, Chicago, 

IL; Rockwell Collins, Inc., Cedar Rapids, 

IA; Rumpf Associates International, Inc., 

Alexandria, VA; S2 Corporation, 

Bozeman, MT; SECUTOR US, LLC, 

Clifton, VA; Shared Spectrum 

Corporation, Vienna, VA; Shenandoah 

Research and Technology, Luray, VA; 

Silvus Technologies, Los Angeles, CA; 

Space Data Association, Malvern, PA; 

Spectronn, Holmdel, NJ; SRC, Inc., 

North Syracuse, NY; Stat Tech, Inc, 

Alexandria, VA; Stevens Institute of 

Technology, Hoboken, NJ; Strategic 

Contrivance, LLC, Annandale, VA; TCI 

International, Inc., Fremont, CA; 

Telecommunications Industry 

Association (TIA), Washington, DC; Test 

Equipment Plus, Inc., La Center, WA; 

University of Illinois, Urbana, IL; 

University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS; 

University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS; 

University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 

Lincoln, NE; University of Oklahoma, 

Norman, OK; University of Pittsburgh, 

Pittsburgh, PA; University of 

Washington, Seattle, WA; URS Federal 

Support Services, Inc., Germantown, 

MD; VA Tech Applied Research 

Corporation, Blacksburg, VA; Vanu, 

Inc., Cambridge, MA; VIStology, Inc. 

Framingham, MA; Wireless Innovation 

Forum, Reston, VA; and xG Technology 

Inc., Sarasota, FL. The general areas of 

NSC’s planned activities are (i) maturing 

technologies that assist in improved 

electromagnetic spectrum awareness, 

sharing, and use; (ii) experimentation to 

better inform the optimal allocation of 

those technologies for both public and 

private objectives; (iii) demonstration of 

new technologies to increase trust 

among spectrum stakeholders; and (iv) 

policy development to ensure 


rmajette on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES