alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas Gutierrez, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Xerium Technologies, Inc. (the Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting.

Date: August 23, 2007



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Thomas Gutierrez                 
|Thomas Gutierrez                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT
32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 
18 U.S.C. §1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of NB Capital Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Serge Lacroix, Chairman and President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Serge LacroixSerge Lacroix
Chairman of the Board
and President

Date:     November 9, 2004

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or any other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

---
Case: 1:20-cv-04247 Document #: 50 Filed: 10/22/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:556
#### William S. JONES, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, and Homecare of Virginia, Incorporated, Plaintiff, v. Maurice A. JONES, Commissioner, Virginia Department of Social Services, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 04-1873.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 10, 2004.

Decided Dec. 21, 2004.

*874William S. Jones, Jr., Appellant pro se. Allen Tate Wilson, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

William S. Jones, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint alleging that the Virginia Department of Social Services wrongfully denied an application for a license renewal for Homecare of Virginia, Inc. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm because, as the district court concluded, Jones lacked standing to sue on behalf of Homecare. *See Homecare of Virginia, Inc. v. Jones,*No. CA-03-417-2 (E.D. Va. June 15, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 588 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 10, 1998.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 4761) to require the United States Trade Representative to take certain 
actions in response to the failure of the European Union to comply with the 
rulings of the World Trade Organization. The bill shall be considered as read 
for amendment. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill 
to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on 
the bill equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 23.1


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors  Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-124590, 333-145120, 333-161219, 333-176020, 333-198312) on Form S-8 and the registration statement (No. 333-163276) on Form S-3 of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. of our reports dated March 10, 2016, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015, and the related financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, which reports appear in the December 31, 2015 annual report on Form 10‐K of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.





/s/ KPMG LLP





Columbus, Ohio  March 10, 2016
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 286 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 29, 1997.
    Resolved, That the House has heard with profound sorrow of the death of the 
Honorable Walter H. Capps, a Representative from the State of California.
    Resolved, That a committee of such Members of the House as the Speaker may 
designate, together with such Members of the Senate as may be joined, be 
appointed to attend the funeral.
    Resolved, That the Sergeant at Arms of the House be authorized and directed 
to take such steps as may be necessary for carrying out the provisions of these 
resolutions and that the necessary expenses in connection therewith be paid out 
of the contingent fund of the House.
    Resolved, That the Clerk of the House communicate these resolutions to the 
Senate and transmit a copy thereof to the family of the deceased.
    Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark 
of respect to the memory of the deceased.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Case: 1:20-cv-03868 Document #: 16 Filed: 08/31/20 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:124
Case: 1:20-cv-03868 Document #: 16 Filed: 08/31/20 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:125
Case: 1:20-cv-03868 Document #: 16 Filed: 08/31/20 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:126
Case: 1:20-cv-03868 Document #: 16 Filed: 08/31/20 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:127
Case: 1:20-cv-03868 Document #: 16 Filed: 08/31/20 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:128
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 601

Returning to the Senate the bill S. 361.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 15, 1998

Mr. CRANE submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Returning to the Senate the bill S. 361.

1 Resolved, That the bill of the Senate (S. 361) entitled

2 the ‘‘Rhinoceros and Tiger Conservation Act of 1998’’, in

3 the opinion of this House, contravenes the first clause of

4 the seventh section of the first article of the Constitution

5 of the United States and is an infringement of the privi6 leges of this House and that such bill be respectfully re7 turned to the Senate with a message communicating this

8 resolution.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.38

May 17, 2004

Fred H. Croninger, III
9 Crestwood Drive
Hudson, NH 03051

                      Re: Amendment to Employment Agreement

Dear Skip:

This letter agreement serves to further amend the Employment Agreement dated as
of September 1, 2003 by and between you and PolyMedica Corporation (the
"Company"), as amended by a certain letter agreement dated January 30, 2004
(together, the "Employment Agreement").

1.    Section 3.1 Salary shall be amended as follows:

      The Base Salary as defined in Section 3.1 of the Employment Agreement
      shall be increased to $246,470, effective April 1, 2004.

2.    Section 3.6 Severance Pay shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced
with the following in lieu thereof:

      Section 3.6 Severance Pay: If at any time during the term of this
      Agreement (including any Extended Employment Period), the Executive's
      employment is terminated by the Company without cause (i.e., other than
      pursuant to Section 3.5 or Section 4 hereof) or the Company does not renew
      or extend this Agreement without cause (i.e. other than consistent with
      Section 3.5 or Section 4 hereof), and subject to the Executive's execution
      and non-revocation of a severance agreement and release drafted by and
      satisfactory to counsel for the Company, the Company shall continue to pay
      Executive at his then current Base Salary for the remainder of the
      Employment Period or for TWELVE months, whichever is longer (the
      "Severance Period"). Neither party shall be entitled to any compensation
      or claim for good will or other loss suffered by reason of termination of
      this Agreement.

If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please indicate your agreement by signing
a copy of this letter agreement and returning it to the undersigned.

                                                         Very truly yours,

                                                         /s/ Samuel L. Shanaman
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Samuel L. Shanaman
                                                         Chairman and Chief
                                                         Executive Officer

ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:

/s/ Fred H. Croninger, III
--------------------------
Fred H. Croninger, III
Case: 1:20-cr-00447 Document #: 22-3 Filed: 01/19/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:52
Handbook 130 – 2015 Uniform Engine Fuels and Automotive Lubricants Regulation

183

G. Uniform Engine Fuels and Automotive Lubricants Regulation

as adopted by

The National Conference on Weights and Measures*

CORRECTION NOTED – July 8, 2015

2.7. Denatured Fuel Ethanol. – Intended for blending with gasoline shall meet the latest version of 

ASTM D4806, “Standard Specification for Denatured Fuel Ethanol for Blending with Gasolines for Use as 

Automotive Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel.”

(Amended 2014)

2.8. Liquefied Petroleum (LP) Gases. – Shall meet the latest version ASTM D1835, “Standard Specification for 

Liquefied Petroleum (LP) Gases.”

NOTE: Also reference Gas Processors Association 2140, Liquefied Petroleum Gas Specification and Test Methods.

2.9. Compressed Natural Gas (CNG). – Shall meet the latest version of SAE J1616, “Recommended Practice 

for Compressed Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel.”

2.10. Ethanol Flex Fuel. – Ethanol flex fuel is covered by one or of two ASTM standards based on the ethanol 

concentration of blend:

(a) Ethanol flex fuel containing 51 to 83 volume percent ethanol shall meet the latest version of ASTM D5789 

D5798, “Standard Specifications for Ethanol Fuel Blends for Flexible Fuel Automotive Spark-Ignition 

Engines”; and

(b) Ethanol flex fuel containing 16 to 50 volume percent ethanol shall be blended, stored, and conveyed for 

consumption in accordance with the latest version of ASTM D7794, “Standard Practice for Blending MidLevel Ethanol Fuel Blends for Flexible Fuel Vehicles with Automotive Spark-Ignition Engines.”

(Added 1997) (Amended 2014)

2.11. M85 Fuel Methanol. – Shall meet the latest version of ASTM D5797, “Standard Specification for Fuel 

Methanol M70-M85 for Automotive Spark Ignition Engines.”

(Added 1997)

2.12. Engine (Motor) Oil. – Shall not be sold or distributed for use unless the product conforms to the following 

specifications:

(a) performance claims listed on the label shall be evaluated against the latest version of SAE J183, “Engine 

Oil Performance and Engine Service Classification,” API 1509 “Engine Oil Licensing and Certification 

System,” European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA), “European Oil Sequences,” or other 

“Vehicle or Engine Manufacturer Standards” as applicable; and

(b) the product shall meet its labeled viscosity grade specification as specified in the latest version of 

SAE J300, “Engine Oil Viscosity Classification.

(Added 2004) (Amended 2014)

2.13. Products for Use in Lubricating Manual Transmissions, Gears, or Axles. – Shall not be sold or 

distributed for use in lubricating manual transmissions, gears, or axles unless the product conforms to the following 

specifications:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,210
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,242
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (754)
<INVENTORY>                                     11,235
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,948
<PP&E>                                          10,086
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,829
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,811
<BONDS>                                         12,042
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           20,709
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,282
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   106,829
<SALES>                                         10,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,728
<CGS>                                            5,288
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,288
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,282
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 484
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     41
<INCOME-TAX>                                        16
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 25
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        25
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001050119
<NAME> DETAILS CAPITAL CORP.

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,575,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               44,282,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 19,181,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            73,973,000
<PP&E>                                      62,978,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             367,350,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       55,696,000
<BONDS>                                    428,116,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                               (144,917,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               367,350,000
<SALES>                                    130,919,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           130,919,000
<CGS>                                       92,034,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               92,034,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          20,755,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (11,000,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,425,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,575,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,575,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
The Impact of

The ANSI/NIST‐ITL Sta

Presented at

The Biometrics Consortium Co

September, 2010
Why use the Standa

• Ensure consistency in data definit

– Meaning of the data

– Usefulness of the data

• Transfer relevant information wit

biometric sample(s)

• Enable data to be collected and u

different types of systems using symultiple vendors (facilitate intero

Blue: National and International System U

Red: State / Provincial / Local System Use

Locations of systems with the stand

for data transfer (known to 
Biometric Center of

Excellence

Biometric Center of

Excellence

The BCOE is the FBI program for

exploring new and advancedbiometric capabilities to solve crimes

and protect national security.

The BCOE is the FBI program for

exploring new and advanced

biometric capabilities to solve crimes

and protect national security.

FBI Biometrics Today

DIAGRAMA CONTANDO LA INTERCONECCION DE LA TOTALIDAD DE ORGAN

BIOMETRICA

Jefatura de Gabinet

PROYECTO “RED NACIONAL DE INFORMACION BIOMETRICA”
FDLE

FALCON Rapid ID

• 2,655 active devices• 75K+ transactions first six mon

• Two Modes:

– Two finger (1:N) search– One finger (1:1) verification

• Response time target <1m• Fingers ‐‐ 2,3,7,8

• Users

– Department of Corrections

– Florida Highway Patrol (every patrol Troope

– Fish & Wildlife Commission

– Department of Environmental Protection

– Sheriffs Offices & Police Departments
BRAD.WING@NIST.GOV

+1 301 975 5663For further information:
Order entered November 7, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00134-CR

HAMID SHOHREH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-82213-2013

ORDER

The Court suspends the 21-day requirement for notice of submission and ORDERS the 

appeal submitted without argument, as of the date of this order, to a panel consisting of Chief 

Justice Wright and Justices Myers and Brown. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 39.8. 

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
#### SHANNON v. UNION BARGE LINE CORP.

Civ. A. No. 8879.

United States District Court W. D. Pennsylvania.

Sept. 26, 1951.

Hymen Schlesingcr, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

John R. Bredin, Dalzell, McFall, Pringle & Bredin, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

McVICAR, District Judge.

On May 15, 1950 plaintiff was employed by defendant as a chambermaid on one of its vessels navigating on the Ohio River and its tributaries. In the performance of her duties as a chambermaid, she had occasion to take a pail of water which had been used in cleaning one of the cabins, to the outside of the boat for emptying of the same in the river. While she was stepping from a cabin door in the performance of her duties, she stepped on a passageway on which she alleged there was oil, which caused her to fall and to injure herself. She brought an action in Admiralty for maintenance and cure. A judgment was entered *in*her favor in the *amount*of $1,162, and costs. D.C., 96 F.Supp. 916. She also brought this action to recover damages on the ground that the vessel was unseaworthy and ihat the defendant was guilty of negligence by reason of the accumulation of oil on the floor. At the trial she received a verdict in her favor in the amount of $7,500. At the trial defendant moved for judgment in its favor, alleging inter alia, that the plaintiff had failed to make out a case against the defendant.

The case is now before us on defendant’s motion for judgment in its favor, or in lieu thereof, for a new trial.

There was no evidence at the trial of how long the oil which caused her to slip and fall had been on the floor, or who had placed it there.

I am of the opinion that this case is ruled in principle by Cookingham v. United States, 3 Cir., 184 F.2d 213, certiorari denied by the Supreme Court of the United *14States, 340 U.S. 935, 71 S.Ct. 495. In that case, a cook slipped on some substance left on a stairway leading to a chill box. There was no evidence in that case of how long the substance had been there prior to the accident or who was responsible for its being there. Under these circumstances, the Court held that on the action to‘ recover damages by reason of unseaworthiness and negligence judgment was. properly entered for the defendant.

At the oral argument, plaintiff offered an amendment to the complaint, which was refused. The. same amendment had been offered during the trial but was withdrawn without prejudice to renewing the same at the close of the testimony, which was not done.