alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
3rd Cybersecurity Framework 

Workshop

Outbrief and 

Discussion of Next Steps

July 12, 2013

University of California, San Diego
• Discuss and Refine the draft Preliminary Framework Outline

• Generate content for the Preliminary Framework

• Discuss specific topics that inform the Preliminary Framework

Workshop Objectives
• The Framework must support the business

• The Framework must enable cost-effective implementation

• The Framework language and communication is critical to success

• The Framework must reflect characteristics of people, processes, and 

technologies

• The Framework must be inclusive of and not disruptive to those good 

practices in use today

• The Framework must include the fundamentals 

• Determination of risk tolerance for critical infrastructure must be 

informed by national interests 

• Threat information must inform Framework implementation

3

What We Heard
• Find the right level of specificity

• Threat informed

• Taxonomy for the Framework

• Identify cross-cutting categories

• Clarify the compendium of Informative References

• Integration of cyber risk into business risk

• Address IT and ICS considerations

• Framework Implementation

• Long term governance

4

Areas to Address
5

• Engage senior executives and boards through effective 

communication of the value proposition of Framework adoption

• Provide guidance and resources to aid small business 

implementations

• Understand unique privacy and civil liberties needs for Critical 

Infrastructures

• Define awareness and training needs in context of Critical 

Infrastructure

• Increase international engagements

• Connect the Framework and the Performance Goals

Topic-Specific Working Sessions
• Publish a post-workshop status update

• Analyze feedback and input received this week:

• Refine the framework structure and terminology

• Consolidate and normalize input received

• Continue to engage with stakeholders

• Post the Draft Preliminary Cybersecurity Framework in August 2013

• Conduct the 4th Workshop at the University of Texas at Dallas 

(September 11-13, 2013)

• Publish the Preliminary Framework for Public Comment - October 

10, 2013

What we will do...
Please send us your notes, continued observations, and further 

suggestions at cyberframework@nist.gov

Continue to work with us on populating the core framework with data

• What would sector specific representations look like?

• Identify commonalities and highlight gaps

• Share your compendiums

Review and Comment on the Next Set of Deliverables to be posted in 

August 2013

4th Cybersecurity Framework Workshop

September 11-13 at the University of Texas at Dallas

7

Stay Engaged
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 57

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on National Security

in the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 13, 1997

Mr. SPENCE (for himself and Mr. Dellums) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on House Oversight

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on

National Security in the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

3 For the expenses of the Committee on National Secu4 rity (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the

5 ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries,

6 there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the

7 House of Representatives for committee salaries and ex8 penses, not more than $10,668,640 for the One Hundred

9 Fifth Congress.
2

•HRES 57 IH

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

2 Of the amount specified in section 1—

3 (1) not more than $5,145,928 shall be available

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

5 noon on January 3, 1997, and ending immediately

6 before noon on January 3, 1998; and

7 (2) not more than $5,522,712 shall be available

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

9 noon on January 3, 1998, and ending immediately

10 before noon on January 3, 1999.

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner

15 directed by the Committee on House Oversight.

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by

19 the Committee on House Oversight.

Æ
Exhibit 32



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pliant Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended

September 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Harold C. Bevis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Brian E. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify as follows, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to the best of our knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/S/    HAROLD C.
BEVIS 
|-----------------------
|Harold C. Bevis        
|Chief Executive Officer



November 12, 2003



|/S/    BRIAN E.
JOHNSON
|-----------------------
|Brian E. Johnson       
|Chief Financial Officer



November 12, 2003
Exhibit 31.2

Certifications

I, Edward Escudero, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Petro Distributing, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Edward Escudero    
|(Edward Escudero)      
|Treasurer and Secretary
#### Milo Baxter, etc., *v.*Curtis M. Fielder, etc.

Fraudulent Conveyance — Heirs of Vendor Cannot Inherit.

Appellant proves that Wm. Fielder caused the land to he conveyed to Mrs. Coen, to protect it from his creditors.. Such being the case, she had a right to hold it as against him and his heirs; therefore, the appellant did not take any part of it by inheritance upon the death of his father.

FROM THE MADISON CIRCUIT COURT.

October 3, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The evidence in this case shows that Curtis Fielder, the real debtor, never held the title to any portion of the tract of land for the purchase price of which the note of Elizabeth Tudor to his wife was given. Upon the contrary, the legal title to such land was in Mrs.'Coen from the year 1856 up to the sale to Tudor. Appellants prove that Wm. Fielder caused the land to be conveyed to Mrs. Coen to protect, it from his creditors. Such being the case, she had the right to hold it as against him and his heirs.

Therefore his son, Curtis Fielder, did not take any part of it by inheritance upon his father’s death. As the land could not have been subjected to the payment of Curtis Fielder’s debts, Mrs. Coen had the right to. give one of the notes given for the *215purchase price thereof to his wife, and this note until it was reduced to the husband’s possession could not be taken by his creditors. He died without having reduced it to possession. Wherefore appellant’s petitions were properly dismissed. Judgment affirmed.

*Turnerfor appellants.*

*Burnam, for appellees.*
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Aspire International, Inc., for the quarter ending March 31, 2010, I, Bok Wong, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Aspire International, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:
  1. Such quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The information contained in such quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aspire International, Inc.
 
 Date: April 14, 2011
Aspire International, Inc.By:
/s/ Bok WongName: Bok WongTitle: Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer
September 29, 2005 

Dear Technical Guidelines Development Committee members, 

I am writing to you in hopes of adding my voice to others that feel that our 

sacred right is in danger. That each and every vote cast in America is 

captured and counted. I have two major areas of concern. The lack of 

verifiable paper ballots in current electronic voting systems. (I live in 

Miami-Dade, FL which has such a system.) and the lack of transparency in the 

electronic systems that count the electronically cast votes. 

First: Please ensure the results of all future votes our great country. 

Insist on a verifiable paper ballot for every state in the Union. The paper 

ballot must be visually inspectable with the names of the candidates and 

clear, positive voting marks. They should be deposited into secure voting 

ballot boxes much the same whay we have done for years. Furthermore, the 

paper ballot count should always be the authoritative count when disputes 

arise. 

Second: Electronic voting is great when used to get results quickly but are 

too easily manipulated without detection. Require that all electronic voting 

systems source code be publicly available and that the code be 

electronically fingerprinted with a high-grade algorithm after it has been 

approved for a given election and allow independent voting verifiers to 

check the fingerprint of the software on any given voting machine not 

exceeding more than 10% of the total units (this is to prevent disruption 

while allowing for verification.) The large voting systems companies would 

still retain copyright and intellectual property rights but they would not 

be able to use that as an excuse for obfuscation of the internals of the 

systems. Suggest to Congress that a law be passed prohibiting voting 

systems vendors from restricting local goverments from inspecting the 

internals of the voting systems under the guise of intellectual 

property/trade secret protection. 

Counting a vote is not rocket science. There is nothing proprietary in what 

a Diebold or ESS system do. It is in essence what computers and software 

have done effectively for nearly a half century, to add numbers and store 

information. 

I have been in IT for 15 years and know full well how easy it is to modify 

electronic records and systems to suit the need of the modifier. I 

currently work as a self-employed IT consultant for home office and small 

office users and spend much of my time recovering data from heavily 

compromised PCs. I work hard to ensure going forward they are as secure as 
can be while still being usable. The voting system in this country deserves 

no less. 

I am hopeful that an institution such as the NIST with bright and 

distiguished people can acheive toward ensuring the American vote remains 

the highest standard of democratic expression worldwide. 

Sincerely, 

-felipe 

-------------------- 

Felipe Vidal 

felipe@nthdegree.org
Continuing Education Units

VERIFICATION OF ATTENDANCE FORM

Certification Number: ________________

 attended the following professional educational activity. 

(NAME)

Title: National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE) Webinar: Overcoming the Entry-Level Job in 

Cybersecurity Conundrum

Date(s): September 21, 2022 CEU Hours Earned: 1 hr 

Sponsor(s): National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 

Explanation of Event: This webinar will highlight the imperative to change employers’ mindsets, modernize the recruitment 

and hiring process, update job announcements and position descriptions to align qualification requirements to the NICE 

Workforce Framework for Cybersecurity, and increase opportunities for Americans to choose a career in cybersecurity.

Webinar attendees will hear presentations from: 

• Erin White, Senior Director, Corporate Initiatives, Business Roundtable

• Karyn McMullen, Global Security HR Lead, Accenture

• Heather Monthie, PhD, CISSP, IT and Cybersecurity Workforce Development Consultant, Stemia Solutions, LLC

Location: Virtual Webinar; www.nist.gov/nice/webinars

Name of Meeting Host: Rodney Petersen, Director of the National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE)

 

Contact Information:

nist.gov/nice 

nice@nist.gov

The Continuing Education Units form is provided as a courtesy. It is the responsibility of the 

attendee to complete and submit with their certifying authority.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1610

HEPHZIBAH BATES, a/k/a Hattie Tea Jenkins Bates,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND,

Defendant – Appellee,

No. 15-1611

HEPHZIBAH BATES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LISA HICKS THOMAS,

Defendant – Appellee,

No. 15-1612

HEPHZIBAH BATES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CBS NEWS,
2

Defendant – Appellee,

No. 15-1613

HEPHZIBAH BATES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

VIRGINIA STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendant – Appellee,

No. 15-1614

HEPHZIBAH BATES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JOEY JENKINS, III,

Defendant – Appellee,

No. 15-1615

HEPHZIBAH BATES, a/k/a Hattie Bates,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LACEY NUNLEY, P.A., Deputy General Counsel, Legal 

Department, The Federal Bank of Richmond,

Defendant – Appellee,
3

No. 15-1616

HEPHZIBAH BATES, a/k/a Hattie Bates,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LACEY NUNLEY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior 

District Judge. (3:14-cv-00320-REP; 3:14-cv-00164-REP; 3:14-cv00165-REP; 3:14-cv-00193-REP; 3:14-cv-00322-REP; 3:14-cv-00380-

REP; 3:14-cv-00381-REP)

Submitted: August 27, 2015 Decided: August 31, 2015

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hephzibah Bates, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
4

PER CURIAM:

Hephzibah Bates appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing her complaints in her consolidated civil suits as 

frivolous and entering a prefiling injunction preventing Bates 

from filing further complaints related to the issues raised in 

the instant complaints. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by 

the district court. See Bates v. Fed. Reserve Bank of Richmond, 

3:14-cv-00320-REP (E.D. Va. May 15, 2015); see also Cromer v. 

Kraft Foods N. Amer., Inc., 390 F.3d 812, 817 (4th Cir. 2004) 

(setting forth standard of review of prefiling injunction). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 2

Case: 1:20-cv-03012 Document #: 62-4 Filed: 02/22/22 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:467
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

COVER LETTER

Exhibit 2 are photos of the windshield of Plaintiff Gus Tousis’s vehicle taken after the 

incident occurred on June 2, 2018.

ALEIA TOUSIS, as Special Administrator of 

the Estate of GUS TOUSIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

SPECIAL AGENT KEITH BILLIOT,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 20 C 3012

Judge Coleman

Magistrate Judge Cox

Case: 1:20-cv-03012 Document #: 62-4 Filed: 02/22/22 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:468
Case: 1:20-cv-03012 Document #: 62-4 Filed: 02/22/22 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:469
Case: 1:20-cv-03012 Document #: 62-4 Filed: 02/22/22 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:470
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 365 Agreed to House (ATH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 365

 Regarding the bill S. 1150, the Agricultural Research, Extension, and 
                 Education Reauthorization Act of 1998.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 1998

 Mr. Smith of Oregon (for himself, Mr. Stenholm, Mr. Combest, and Mr. 
  Dooley of California) submitted the following resolution; which was 
         considered under suspension of the rules and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Regarding the bill S. 1150, the Agricultural Research, Extension, and 
                 Education Reauthorization Act of 1998.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution the House shall be 
considered to have:
            (1) taken from the Speaker's table the bill (S. 1150 
        entitled ``An Act to ensure that federally funded agricultural 
        research, extension, and education address high-priority 
        concerns with national or multistate significance, to reform, 
        extend, and eliminate certain agricultural research programs, 
        and for other purposes'';
            (2) struck out all after the enacting clause of the bill S. 
        1150 and inserted in lieu thereof an amendment consisting of 
        the text of the bill (H.R. 2534) entitled ``An Act to reform, 
        extend, and repeal certain agricultural research, extension, 
        and education programs, and for other purposes'', as passed by 
        the House;
            (3) passed the bill S. 1150 as amended; and
            (4) insisted on the House amendment and requested a 
        conference with the Senate thereon.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3884 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3884

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 615 East Houston Street in San Antonio, Texas, as the ``Hipolito F. 
        Garcia Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3884

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 615 East Houston Street in San Antonio, Texas, as the ``Hipolito F. 
        Garcia Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 615 
East Houston Street in San Antonio, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Hipolito F. Garcia Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``Hipolito F. Garcia Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 21, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 PURSUANT
TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B)
 
 OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of EPL Intermediate, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary Campanaro, Senior
Vice President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 Date:
      March 30, 2010/s/ Gary CampanaroGary
      CampanaroSenior
      Vice PresidentEPL
      Intermediate, Inc.
 
 This
certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not
for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to EPL Intermediate, Inc. and will be retained by
EPL Intermediate, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.