alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION

WALTER URBANSKI, individually and 

on behalf of a class of similarly situated 

individuals, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

HERCULES FORWARDING, INC., a 

California corporation, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

) 

) 

 

 Case No. 20-cv-03926 

 Judge John F. Kness 

ORDER REMANDING PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM UNDER 740 ILCS 14/15(a) 

 Based on the Parties’ Rule 26(f) Status Report (Dkt. 51), as well as the reasons 

provided during the hearing held in this matter on October 9, 2020, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. The Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s claim under 

740 ILCS 14/15(a); 

2. The Court accordingly severs and remands Plaintiff’s claim under 740 

ILCS 14/15(a) to the Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, 

the state court from which this case was removed; 

3. The remainder of Plaintiff’s claims in this action are not remanded; and 

4. The Clerk shall effectuate the partial remand forthwith. 

SO ORDERED. 

 

Date: October 26, 2020 

 JOHN F. KNESS 

 United States District Judge 

Case: 1:20-cv-03926 Document #: 19 Filed: 10/26/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:116
8686.

#### James *v.*Thompson.

Wade, C. J.

1. Under the answers of the Supreme Court to questions certified by this court in this case, a justice of the peace acts as a judge of a special tribunal in passing upon such claims for damages ! as are included by the provisions of section -2034 of the Civil Code of 1910, in the manner therein provided; and, acting as a judge of such *451special tribunal under the provisions of said section, he may give judgment for- damages where the damage complained of is to growing or immature crops. See 148 *Ga.*201 (96 S. E. 216).

Decided July 9, 1918.

Certiorari; from Bibb superior court—Judge Mathews. March 9, 1917.

*Charles*Alcerman, for plaintiff in error. *8. W.*Hatcher, contra.

2. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the motion to dismiss the case, or in holding that the justice had jurisdiction to entertain and try it as provided by section 2034, supra, and that there was sufficient evidence to sustain the judgment rendered.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.*
#### Grant CHISM, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 04-1979.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 2004.

Decided Dec. 20, 2004.

Grant Chism, Appellant pro se. Scott Sheldon Oakley, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Grant Chism appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Chism v. Dep’t of Public Safety,*No. CA-04-220-RDB (D.Md. July 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
EXHIBIT 32


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, the undersigned, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:


         o        the  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of  Perfisans  Holdings,
                  Inc. (the  "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2004,
                  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         o        the information  contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents,
                  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
                  of operations of the Company.



Date:  May 19, 2006


                                             /s/ To-Hon Lam
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             To-Hon Lam
                                             Chief Executive Officer &
                                             Principal Accounting Officer
#### Tawana S. ALLEN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. FORD CREDIT, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 04-2043.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 2004.

Decided Dec. 20, 2004.

Tawana S. Alen, Appellant pro se. Thomas Lynn Ogburn, III, Nancy Lewis Huegerich, Poyner & Spruill, L.L.P., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Mfirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Tawana S. Alen appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Allen v. Ford Credit,*No. CA-04-310-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Case: 1:20-cv-00421 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/19/20 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1
Case: 1:20-cv-00421 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/19/20 Page 2 of 7 PageID #:1
Case: 1:20-cv-00421 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/19/20 Page 3 of 7 PageID #:1
Case: 1:20-cv-00421 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/19/20 Page 4 of 7 PageID #:1
Case: 1:20-cv-00421 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/19/20 Page 5 of 7 PageID #:1
Case: 1:20-cv-00421 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/19/20 Page 6 of 7 PageID #:1
Case: 1:20-cv-00421 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/19/20 Page 7 of 7 PageID #:1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001104252
<NAME> DDI CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,498                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  107,282                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,942)                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     28,101                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,135                       0
<PP&E>                                         159,645                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                (68,658)                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 513,469                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          118,412                       0
<BONDS>                                        378,509                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           393                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,019)                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   513,469                       0
<SALES>                                        326,400                 149,582
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               326,400                 149,582
<CGS>                                          210,620                  95,132
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  210,620                  95,132
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                61,316                  25,620
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,115                  10,427
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,349                  18,403
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,478                   8,983
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,871                   9,420
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,551)                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,320                   9,420
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.11                    0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10                    0.22


</TABLE>
Agenda:

Business Roundtable on the U.S. Government National Standards Strategy 

for Critical and Emerging Technology (USG NSSCET) 

Broadening Participation and Increasing Engagement in International Standards for CETs

UC San Diego Park & Market 

1100 Market St

San Diego, CA 92101

Monday, December 11, 2023

1-4 p.m. PST

12:45 PM Arrive at Park and Market

1:00 PM – 1:15 PM Welcome and Opening Remarks (NIST and San Diego Co-Hosts)

Nikia Clark, Senior Vice President, San Diego Regional Economic 

Development Corporation; Executive Director, World Trade Center San Diego

Charles Romine, Associate Director Laboratory Programs, NIST

Aron M. Davidson, Director, San Diego and Imperial, U.S. Commercial 

Service, International Trade Administration

1:15 PM – 1:30 PM

1:30 PM – 1:55 PM

Overview of Strategy – Jayne Morrow, Senior Advisor to the Director for 

Standards Policy, NIST

Stage Setting: Lessons Learned from Critical Technology Standards -

Kevin Stine, Chief of the Applied Cybersecurity Division, NIST 

2:00 PM – 2:40 PM Roundtable Discussion - Emerging Technology: Role of Standards in 

Transitioning from Research to Market

Moderator: Jayne Morrow, NIST

Discussions will cover novel ways to 1) increase public-private information 

sharing in CET standards, 2) embed CET standards development activities into 

the R&D cycles including where technology convergence is creating unique 

challenges, 3) incentivize greater support for international CET standards 

participation from the academia and small and medium sized enterprises and 

novel ways to increase public-private investment in CET. Discuss an overview 

of the link between standards readiness and technology readiness levels (cover 

CHIPS, biotechnology related examples) as well as market readiness levels. 

2:40 PM – 2:50 PM Break
2:50 PM – 3:20 PM Panel Discussion – Perspectives from Industry, Academia and Government 

Moderator: Brandyi Phillips, NIST

Panelists:

Ed Tiedemann, Senior Vice President of Engineering and Qualcomm Fellow

Corinne Peek-Asa, Ph.D., Vice Chancellor for Research, UC San Diego

Aron M. Davidson, Director, San Diego and Imperial, U.S. Commercial 

Service, International Trade Administration

Discussions will cover: 1) How can government, industry and academia work 

together to increase public-private information sharing in CET standards? 

2)Based on this discussion, how can government work with industry and 

academia to incentivize greater support for international CET standards 

participation? 3) What are some of the investment opportunities including 

public private partnership models to support new and emerging technologies? 

4) Based on the discussion today, please share three specific ways you heard 

where standards development efforts reduce market risk and engaging in 

standards can provide opportunities for academia and small and medium sized 

enterprises. 

3:20 PM – 3:30 PM Summary of Findings – Jayne Morrow, NIST
#### Loretta MORRISON, Claimant-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 03-7067.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 20, 2004.

ORDER

Pursuant to the Court’s letter dated September 23, 2004,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

This appeal is dismissed.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

TERRANCE BURROWS, DOC #C00373, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1177 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed December 5, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, Public Defender and Timothy J. Ferreri, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.


### SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Todd Weintraub, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1)

          the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. By:

          /s/ Todd WeintraubTodd Weintraub Chief Financial Officer February 20, 2013 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 167 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 20, 1997.
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. APPLICATION.

    This resolution shall apply to the investigation by the Committee on 
Government Reform and Oversight of political fundraising improprieties and 
possible violations of law.

SEC. 2. HANDLING OF INFORMATION.

    Information obtained under the authority of this resolution shall be--
            (1) considered as taken by the Committee on Government Reform and 
        Oversight in the District of Columbia, as well as at the location 
        actually taken; and
            (2) considered as taken in executive session.

SEC. 3. DEPOSITIONS AND INTERROGATORIES.

    The chairman of the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, after 
consultation with the ranking minority member of the committee, may--
            (1) order the taking of depositions or interrogatories anywhere 
        within the United States, under oath and pursuant to notice or subpoena; 
        and
            (2) designate a member of the committee or an attorney on the staff 
        of the committee to conduct any such proceeding.

SEC. 4. INTERNATIONAL AUTHORITIES.

    The chairman of the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, after 
consultation with the ranking minority member of the committee, may--
            (1) order the taking of depositions and other testimony under oath 
        anywhere outside the United States; and
            (2) make application for issuance of letters rogatory, and request, 
        through appropriate channels, other means of international assistance, 
        as appropriate.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,827
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,603
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     15,904
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,604
<PP&E>                                           4,919
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 120,373
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,477
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           20,992
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            69
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,824
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   120,373
<SALES>                                         38,209
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,209
<CGS>                                           17,501
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,226
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,271)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,096 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    983 
<INCOME-TAX>                                       373
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                578
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       578
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
        


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Abby Graf","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/agraf\/","title":"Mars Audio Log #4","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"pm1M26adU0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/houston-we-have-a-podcast\/mars-audio-log-4\/\">Mars Audio Log #4<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/houston-we-have-a-podcast\/mars-audio-log-4\/embed\/#?secret=pm1M26adU0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Mars Audio Log #4” — NASA\" data-secret=\"pm1M26adU0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/hwhap-ep-314-featued-image.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3824

To facilitate the operation, maintenance, and capital improvement of Camp 

Navajo, Arizona, by the Arizona Army National Guard. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2004

Mr. RENZI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL

To facilitate the operation, maintenance, and capital improvement of Camp Navajo, Arizona, by the Arizona Army 

National Guard.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, AND CAPITAL IM4 PROVEMENT OF CAMP NAVAJO, ARIZONA. 

5 (a) PRIVATE SECTOR USE OF CAMP NAVAJO.—The 

6 Secretary of the Army shall enter into an agreement with 

7 the State of Arizona, acting by and through the Adjutant 

8 General of the Arizona Army National Guard, to amend 

9 License No. DACA09–3–82–153 between the Secretary 

10 and the State of Arizona, which relates to the use of Camp 
2

•HR 3824 IH 

1 Navajo, the former Navajo Depot Activity, Arizona, by the 

2 Arizona Army National Guard as a year-round training 

3 and support installation, to authorize the Arizona Army 

4 National Guard to use excess capacity at Camp Navajo 

5 to provide services and facilities for a fee to private sector 

6 entities. 

7 (b) CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES.—The amend8 ment required by subsection (a) shall authorize the con9 struction of facilities at Camp Navajo by private sector 

10 entities, except that appropriated funds may not be used 

11 for this purpose, and no private entity shall obtain any 

12 ownership rights in any customer-funded facilities. 

13 (c) TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS.—Any contract 

14 with a private sector entity entered into pursuant to the 

15 amended license shall include a provision providing for the 

16 termination of the contract in the event Camp Navajo fa17 cilities are needed for national defense purposes. 

18 (d) HOLD HARMLESS.—Contracts with private enti19 ties entered into pursuant to the amended license shall 

20 contain provisions holding the United States harmless for 

21 any liability that may arise due to the private entity uti22 lizing Camp Navajo facilities and holding the private enti23 ty responsible for any environmental cleanup and compli24 ance required by their activities at Camp Navajo. 
3

•HR 3824 IH 

1 (e) TREATMENT OF RECEIPTS.—Revenues generated 

2 under contracts with private entities entered into pursuant 

3 to the amended license may be deposited in the Camp 

4 Navajo fund established by section 26–152 of the Arizona 

5 Revised Statutes, but such revenues shall be used only to 

6 support the infrastructure and troop programs of the Ari7 zona Army National Guard.

Æ
# STATEOFLOUISIANA COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS OPTUMRX, INC. AND UNITED HEALTHCARE OF LOUISIANA, INC D/B/A UNITED HEALTHCARE COMMUNITY PLAN NO. 2024 CW 0347 

### APRIL 18, 2024 In Re: Optumrx, Inc. and United Healthcare of Louisiana, Inc. D/B/A United Healthcare Community Plan, applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 717848. BEFORE: THERIOT, PENZATO, AND GREENE, JJ. STAY DENIED; WRIT DENIED.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT MRT AHP

HG