alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 7, 2011 

0131 

Order 

 

February 7, 2011 

141887 

LINDA SKRINE and JOSEPH SKRINE, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 141887 

 COA: 290469 

Oakland CC: 2007-086418-NO 

MICHAEL L. VANDERBEEK, D.D.S., JOHN 

KILLINGER, D.D.S., GLEN J. MARSACK, 

D.D.S., NANCY MARSACK, KILLINGER 

& VANDERBEEK, P.L.L.C., and MARSACK 

PROPERTIES, L.L.C., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 31, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MEP Advisory Board Meeting 

AGENDA

Sunday, September 15, 2019

Atlanta Marriott Marquis Hotel 

Atrium A; Mezzanine Level

265 Peachtree Center Ave NE

Atlanta, GA 30303

Sunday, September 15, 2019

MEP Advisory Board Meeting

8:30 a.m. – 8:35 a.m.

5 minutes

Meeting Logistics • Cheryl Gendron, NIST MEP 

8:35 a.m.– 9:15 a.m.

40 minutes

Welcome and Introductions

• Opening Remarks

• Welcome from NIST Leadership

• Board and Audience Introductions

• Bernadine Hawes, Chair, MEP 

Advisory Board 

• Carroll Thomas, NIST MEP

• Dr. Walt Copan, NIST

9:15 a.m. – 9:35 a.m.

20 minutes

Director’s Update 

o Board Feedback & Discussion

• Carroll Thomas, NIST MEP

9:35 a.m. – 9:55 a.m.

20 minutes

Presentation: 

• NIST MEP Policy Academy Overview

o Board Feedback & Discussion

• Mark Schmit, NIST MEP

 

9:55 a.m. – 10:10 a.m.

15 minutes

Break 

10:10 a.m. – 10:30 a.m.

20 minutes

Presentation: 

• NIST Cyber CAP Award Update

o Board Feedback & Discussion

• Dave Stieren, NIST MEP

 

10:30 a.m. – 11:00 a.m.

30 minutes

MEP National NetworkTM 2017-2022

Strategic Plan Update

o Board Feedback & Discussion

• Carroll Thomas, NIST MEP

11:00 a.m.- 12:30 p.m.

One hour and a half

Presentation and Group Activity: 

• Board Engagement with the MEP 

National Network 

o Roundtables - Feedback & Discussion

• Bernadine Hawes, Chair, MEP 

Advisory Board 

• Jim Watson, CMTC and Chair 

of the Center Leadership Team 

(CLT)

• NIST MEP Resource

Management Team (RMs)

• Lisë Stewart, EisnerAmper

12:30 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.

One hour 

Lunch Break 
1:30 p.m. – 1:35 p.m.

5 minutes

Welcome Back/Afternoon Overview • Bernadine Hawes, Chair, MEP 

Advisory Board 

1:35 p.m. – 2:25 p.m.

55 minutes

Working Group Update:

• Supply Chain Development Working 

Group

o Board Feedback & Discussion

• Matt Newman, Vice Chair, MEP 

Advisory Board

• Dave Stieren, NIST MEP

2:25 p.m.- 3:05 p.m.

45 minutes

Working Group Update:

• Executive Committee Working Group

o Board Feedback & Discussion

• Bernadine Hawes, Chair, MEP 

Advisory Board 

• Carroll Thomas, NIST MEP

• Phillip Wadsworth, NIST MEP

• Chery Gendron, NIST MEP

3:05 p.m. – 3:30 p.m.

25 minutes

Wrap-up/Public Comments • Bernadine Hawes, Chair, MEP 

Advisory Board 

• Carroll Thomas, NIST MEP

*Non-FACA Items

Rev. 9/8/2019

All times are subject to change.

Meeting Open to the Public/Registration Complimentary but Required:

Anyone wishing to attend the MEP Advisory Board meeting must register for the 

meeting on the MEP National Network Summit Website, no later than Friday,

September 6, 2019, 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time. 

https://tinyurl.com/MEPNationalNetworkSummit2019 

Any questions may be directed to Cheryl.Gendron@nist.gov.
EXHIBIT 99.17




CONSENT OF THOMAS L. DRIELICK
 
  The undersigned hereby consents to reference to the undersigned’s name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 40-F being filed by Mercator Minerals Ltd. with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with (1) the El Pilar Project 43-101F1 Technical Study Report, Feasibility Study dated November 9, 2011 (the “El Pilar Report”) and (2) the annual information form of the Corporation dated March 30, 2012, which includes reference to my name in connection with information relating to the El Pilar Report and the properties described therein.
  Date: March 30, 2012
   /s/ Thomas L. Drielick

Thomas L. Drielick, P.E.
MICHAEL P. ADERHOLD,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-0977

Opinion filed March 20, 2015.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original 

Jurisdiction.

Michael P. Aderhold, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the 

merits.

LEWIS, C.J., MARSTILLER and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

I, Don Early, Chief Executive Officer of QCHoldings, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to Section 1350, of chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code, and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, (1) the annualreport on Form 10-K of the Company, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A, to which this Exhibit is attached (together, the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/ Don Early 

Don Early 

Dated: June 4,2009 

 

I, Douglas E. Nickerson, Chief Financial Officer of QC Holdings, Inc. (the“Company”), hereby certify pursuant to Section 1350, of chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code, and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, (1) the annual report on Form 10-K ofthe Company, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A, to which this Exhibit is attached (together, the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/Douglas E. Nickerson 

Douglas E. Nickerson 

Dated:June 4, 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

DR. ROBERT GERBER, )

on behalf of plaintiff and )

the class members defined herein, )

)

Plaintiff, ) 20CV4408

)

v. )

) Honorable Robert W. Gettleman

EASTERN PPE IMPORTS, LLC, )

and JOHN DOES 1-10, )

)

Defendants. )

 ORDER ENTERING DEFAULT JUDGMENT

This matter coming to be heard on prove-up hearing on damages and attorney’s fees and

costs in support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, all parties having notice and

the Court being fully advised in its premises, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

Default judgment is entered against Defendant Eastern PPE Imports, LLC, and in

Plaintiff Dr. Robert Gerber’s favor, in the amount of $1,500.00 for Plaintiff in statutory damages,

plus $2,852.50 in attorney’s fees and $435.00 in costs of suit. 

Defendant Eastern PPE Imports, LLC, is enjoined from further transmitting unsolicited

facsimile advertisements into the state of Illinois to Plaintiff Dr. Robert Gerber. 

Plaintiff’s individual claims against John Does 1-10 are dismissed with prejudice and

without costs, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41.

Dated: _December 22, 2020_____ _____________________________________

Judge

Case: 1:20-cv-04408 Document #: 11 Filed: 12/22/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:138
#### James Douglas HALL, Jr., Petitioner—Appellant, v. Alton BASKERVILLE, Warden of Powhatan Correctional Center, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 04-7603.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 2004.

Decided Dec. 28, 2004.

James Douglas Hall, Jr., Appellant pro se. Jerry Walter Kilgore, Attorney General, Leah Ann Darron, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

James Douglas Hall, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of ap*286pealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hall has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.1

Eastern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cr−00352

Honorable Steven C. Seeger

Samuel Uchenna Aniukwu, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, August 1, 2023:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger as to Samuel Uchenna

Aniukwu: The motions to seal (Dckt. Nos. [228], [230]) are hereby granted. Mailed

notice. (jjr, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
#### MICHAEL PAGE TELLEKAMP v. GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA; WALTER A. BURCH, in his official capacity and in his individual capacity, JOHN SHORE, in his official capacity and in his individual capacity

No. 387PA96

(Filed 9 May 1997)

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 and on writ of certiorari pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-32(b) and N.C. R. App. P. 21(a)(2) of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 123 N.C. App. 360, 473 S.E.2d 695 (1996), dismissing plaintiff’s appeal from order entered 7 July 1994 and defendants’ appeal from order entered 27 October 1995 by Allen (W. Steven, Sr.), J., in Superior Court, Guilford County. This Court allowed defendants’ petition for discretionary review and petition for writ of certiorari on 7 November 1996. Heard in the Supreme Court 16 April 1997.

*J. Michael McGuinness for plaintiff-appellee.*

*Guilford County Attorney’s Office, by Jonathan V. Maxwell, County Attorney, and J. Edwin Pons, Deputy County Attorney, for defendant-appellants.*

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED; CERTIORARI IMPROVTDENTLY ALLOWED.
Continuing Education Units

VERIFICATION OF ATTENDANCE FORM

Certification Number: ________________

 attended the following professional educational activity. 

(NAME)

Title: Federal Information Security Educators (FISSEA) Fall Forum

Date(s): November 15, 2022 CEU Hours Earned: 3 hours 

Sponsor(s): National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 

Explanation of Event: The FISSEA Forums are quarterly meetings to provide opportunities for policy and programmatic 

updates, the exchange of best practices, and discussion and engagement among members of the Federal Information 

Security Educators (FISSEA) community. Webinar attendees heard presentations from: 

• Maureen Premo, Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency, Department of Homeland Security

• Paula Januszkiewicz, Founder and CEO, Microsoft Regional Director, CQURE

• Susan Hansche, Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency, Department of Homeland Security

• Stacey Wise, IT Specialist, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

• Scott Anderson, Department of Veteran Affairs

• Sharon McPherson, Senior Cybersecurity Specialist for Policy, Department of Veterans Affairs

• Donald Costello, Associate Professor Emeritus, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

• Mark W. Henderson, Security Specialist, Internal Revenue Service

• Menachem Goldstein, Cybersecurity Specialist, Enterprise Cybersecurity Department, Pension Benefit Guaranty 

Corporation

Location: Virtual Webinar; www.nist.gov/fissea

Name of Meeting Host: Rodney Petersen, Director of the National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE) 

 

Contact Information:

nist.gov/nice 

nice@nist.gov

The Continuing Education Units form is provided as a courtesy. It is the responsibility of the 

attendee to complete and submit with their certifying authority.
Continuing Education Units

VERIFICATION OF ATTENDANCE FORM

Certification Number: ________________

 attended the following professional educational activity. 

(NAME)

Title: National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE) Webinar: Optimizing Your LinkedIn Profile for 

Your Cybersecurity Career

Date(s): July 20, 2022 CEU Hours Earned: 1 hr 

Sponsor(s): National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 

Explanation of Event: During this webinar, LinkedIn pros will share tips and tricks on how to optimize your LinkedIn profile –

“rock your profile” -- so that employers, recruiters, and other professionals can easily find you and help you grow your 

network with the goal of advancing you in your career. Webinar attendees will hear presentations from: 

• Michele Stark, Federal Account Director, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, LinkedIn

Location: Virtual Webinar; www.nist.gov/nice/webinars

Name of Meeting Host: Danielle Santos, Manager, Communications and Operations, Lead for International 

Engagement, National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE)

 

Contact Information:

nist.gov/nice

nice@nist.gov

The Continuing Education Units form is provided as a courtesy. It is the responsibility of the 

attendee to complete and submit with their certifying authority.
★

H. Res. 369

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 25, 1998.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and

that they are hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Ms. Vela ́zquez to

rank directly above Mr. Sisisky.

COMMITTEE ON BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES:

That the powers and duties conferred upon the ranking minority member by House rules shall be exercised by the next

senior member until otherwise ordered by the House.

Attest:

Clerk.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

             GE FINANCIAL ASSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

               Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                         Six Months Ended July 1, 2000

                                  (Unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>




                                                                              Ratio of
                                                                             Earnings to
(Dollar amounts in millions)                                                Fixed Charges
                                                                        -------------------
<S>                                                                       <C>
Net earnings                                                                    $341
Provision for income taxes                                                       204
Minority Interest                                                                  2
                                                                        -------------------

Earnings before income taxes and minority interest                               547
                                                                        -------------------
Fixed charges:
 Interest                                                                         62
 Interest portion of net rentals                                                  20
                                                                        -------------------

Total fixed charges                                                               82
                                                                        -------------------

Less interest capitalized, net of amortization                                   ---
                                                                        -------------------
Earnings before income taxes and minority interest, plus fixed
 charges                                                                        $629
                                                                        ===================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                               7.7
                                                                        ===================

</TABLE>


For purposes of computing the ratios, fixed charges consist of interest on all
indebtedness and one-third of rentals, which management believes is a reasonable
approximation of the interest factor of such rentals.
Letter Agreement for Steven L. Barnett



 Exhibit 10.14 
  
 

 
  
 May 30, 2004

  
 Steven L. Barnett 
 7 Sylvan Way 
 Parsippany, NJ 07054 
  
 Dear Steve, 
  
 This letter will confirm our understanding regarding severance. Per Jackson Hewitt Tax
Service, Inc.’s (the “Company”) standard policy, this letter is not intended nor should it be considered as an employment contract for a definite or indefinite period of time. As you know, employment with the Company is at will, and
either you or the Company may terminate employment at any time, with or without cause. If however, you are terminated without cause during your first year of employment with the Company, you will receive severance equal to one times your then base
salary and target bonus incentive, subject to you executing a release of claims in the form determined by the Company. If however, you are terminated without cause by the Company after your first year of employment with the Company, you will receive
severance equal to one times your then base salary, subject to you executing a release of claims in the form determined by the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time during your employment, in the event you are terminated without cause
by the Company, within twelve months following a change in control of the Company, you will receive severance equal to two times your then base salary, subject to you executing a release of claims in the form determined by the Company. This letter
shall be effective as of and contingent upon the consummation of the Company’s initial public offering. 
  
 Sincerely, 
 /s/    Mike Lister
#### Haywood M. CLAYTON; Sylvia K. Clayton, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, and Lawrence S. Maitin; Morris, Schneider & Prior, LLC, Defendants.

No. 04-1849.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 10, 2004.

Decided Dec. 29, 2004.

*302Haywood M. Clayton, Sylvia K. Clayton, Appellants pro se. Dena Beth Langley, Stuart Carien Gauffreau, Nexsen Pruet Adams Kleemeier, PLLC, Greensboro, North Carolina; Angel R. Gordon, Morris, Schneider & Prior, LLC, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Haywood M. Clayton and Sylvia K. Clayton appeal from the district court’s orders granting Ameriquest Mortgage Company’s motion to enforce the settlement agreement between the parties and denying the Claytons’ motion for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Clayton v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.,*No. CA-02-415-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 5, 2004 & filed June 18, 2004; entered June 21, 2004). In light of this disposition, we deny the Claytons’ motion for a stay pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
exv10w2



 






EXHIBIT 10.2




FIRST AMENDMENT TO

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this
“Amendment”) is entered into effective as of October 14, 2005, by and between CancerVax
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Dennis Van Epps
(“Executive”).



     WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend that certain Second Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement dated as of November 15, 2004, between the Company and Executive (the
“Original Agreement”), to to extend the term of such agreement.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the various covenants and agreements hereinafter set
forth, the parties hereto agree as follows:



     1. Amendment to Section 2. Section 2 of the Original Agreement is hereby restated in
its entirety to read as follows:



          “2. Employment Period. Subject to the provisions for earlier termination hereinafter
provided, Executive’s employment hereunder shall be for a term (the “Employment Period”)
commencing on the Effective Date and ending on November 25, 2008.”




     2. No Other Amendments. Except as expressly provided for in this Amendment, no other
term or provision of the Original Agreement is amended or modified in any respect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth
above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	CANCERVAX CORPORATION	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ David F. Hale
 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	David F. Hale	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	President and CEO	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 





	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	/s/ Dennis Van Epps
 

Dennis Van Epps