alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-82,357-01

EX P ARTE ISREAL REYES, S R. , Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. CR2012-428- 1 IN THE 207th DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM COMA L COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1

. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W

. 2 d 8 2 4 , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of one count of ag g rava ted assault with a deadly wea pon ag ainst a family member, one count of endang ering a child, and one count of unlawful possessi o n o f a fi rea rm. Applicant was sentenc ed to twenty y ear s’ imprisonment for the ag g ravated assault count and ten y ear s’ imprisonment on the other two counts. Applicant contends that his counsel render ed ineffec tive assistance beca use counsel failed to timely file a notice of appe al.2

Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Strickland v. W

ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson , 993 S.W .2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); Ex parte Axe l , 757 S.W .2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). In these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. As we he ld in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropr iat e fo ru m for finding s of fac t. The trial court shall order counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffe ctive assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d)

. I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hearing, it shall dete rmine whe ther Applica nt is indi g ent. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the t ri al court shall appoint an attorney to repre sent Applicant at the hearing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The t ri al court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions of l aw as to whether Applicant

was denied his rig ht to a meaning ful appea l beca use Applicant’s counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. The trial court shall also make any other finding s of fact and conclusions of l aw that it deems re levant and a

ppropriate to the dispositi on of Applica nt’s claim for ha

beas c orpus re lief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 day s of this order

. A sup p l em en t al t ranscript containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, alongwith the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court within 120 day s of t he date of t his order. Any extensions of ti me shall be obtained f

rom this Court. Filed: Nove mber 19, 2014 Do not publish
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           I, Brian C. Harriss, as Chief Financial Officer of North Atlantic
Holding Company, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

           (1) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period
ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: August 19, 2005


/s/ Brian C. Harriss
----------------------------------
Name:    Brian C. Harriss
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2014-N-0001]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an amendment to the notice of meeting of the Science Board to the Food and Drug Administration. This meeting was announced in the                         **Federal Register**                         of October 8, 2014. The amendment is being made to reflect changes in URL for the Webcast. There are no other changes.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Martha Monser, Office of the Chief Scientist, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 1, Rm. 3309, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-4627, or FDA Advisory Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in the Washington, DC area). Please call the Information Line for up-to-date information on this meeting.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of October 8, 2014 (79 FR 60856), FDA announced that a meeting of the Science Board to the Food and Drug Administration would be held on November 19 and 20, 2014. On page 60857, in the first column, the URL information is changed to read as follows:                

                    The link for the Webcast on November 19, 2014, is available at:                     *https://collaboration.fda.gov/​scienceboard111914/​.*                     The link for the Webcast on November 20, 2014, is available at:                     *https://collaboration.fda.gov/​scienceboard112014.*

This notice is issued under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2) and 21 CFR part 14, relating to the advisory committees.

Dated: November 5, 2014.

Jill Hartzler Warner,

Associate Commissioner for Special Medical Programs.

[FR Doc. 2014-26821 Filed 11-12-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
EXHIBIT
        32.1
 **CERTIFICATION
          OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
          TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002** **(18
          U.S.C. § **1350)****
 I,
          Charles E. Ramey, of US Dataworks, Inc. certify pursuant to section 906
          of the
          Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 (i)  the
          Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”),
          which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of
          section
          13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (ii)  the
            information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
            respects,
            the financial condition and results of operations of US Dataworks,
            Inc.
  Dated:
          August 28, 2008
 /s/
                        Charles E. RameyCharles
                        E. RameyChief
                        Executive Officer
H. Res. 553

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 25, 1998.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2621) to extend trade

authorities procedures with respect to reciprocal trade agreements, and for other purposes. The bill shall be considered

as read for amendment. The amendment in the nature of a

substitute recommended by the Committee on Ways and

Means now printed in the bill, modified by the amendments

printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall be considered as adopted. All points

of order against the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as

amended, to final passage without intervening motion except:

(1) two hours of debate on the bill, as amended, which shall

be equally divided and controlled by the chairman and rank-
2

•HRES 553 EH

ing minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means;

and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 31.1


Rule 13a-14(d) Certification





I, In-Young Chase, certify that:





1.           I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of MS Structured Asset Corp. on behalf of SATURNS Trust No. 2004-6;





2.           Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;





3.           Based on my knowledge, and except as disclosed in the Compliance Certificate, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;





4.           I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the Compliance Certificate, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and





5.           The reports, together with the Compliance Certificate, disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trustee and the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Bank of America, National Association as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association and its officers and agents.







By: /s/In-Young ChaseName:        In-Young ChaseTitle:          Vice PresidentDate:           March 31, 2011
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GE Financial Assurance Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas W. Casey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Thomas W. Casey
-----------------------
Thomas W. Casey
Chief Financial Officer
July 31, 2002
# JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
HAVANA REPUBLIC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FORM 10-QSB FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                         JUL-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                    441,581
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                              10,941
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                               784,764
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1,537,286
<PP&E>                                    812,375
<DEPRECIATION>                            161,010
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          2,626,157
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     320,149
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                               760,906
<COMMON>                                4,084,015
<OTHER-SE>                            (2,780,194)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            2,626,157
<SALES>                                   290,059
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          290,059
<CGS>                                     140,351
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             140,351
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          332,393
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        (182,685)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        223,593
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (401,839)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (401,839)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                            (401,839)
<EPS-BASIC>                              (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (0.01)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC (the Company) for the
year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick Bratton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 26, 2009

/s/ Patrick BrattonPatrick Bratton Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
#### Murlin R. PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. Jon A. KISER, Wayne County Prosecutor, Appellee.

No. 04-1660.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 30, 2004.

Decided Jan. 10, 2005.

Murlin R. Phillips, Missouri State Penitentiary, Jefferson City, MO, pro se.

Before MURPHY, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Murlin Phillips appeals from the district court’s preservice dismissal of his fee-paid 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Wayne County Prosecutor Jon Kiser.

We conclude that we lack jurisdiction over Phillips’s appeal, because the order Phillips challenges is not a final appealable order. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1291 (creating appellate jurisdiction over final decisions of district courts); *Thomas v. Basham,*931 F.2d 521, 522-24 (8th Cir.1991) (appellate courts have obligation to raise jurisdictional issues sua sponte “when there is an indication that jurisdiction is lacking”). Phillips’s complaint included allegations that Kiser had him transferred to a different prison and held in solitary confinement, interfering with his ability to prepare a defense in his state court criminal case. The district court’s order did not address this claim. *See*Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) (“order or other form of decision, however designated, which adjudicates fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties shall not terminate the action as to any of the claims or parties”).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal without prejudice. We deny Phillips’s pending motions.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6219

KENNETH WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN, M.R.D.C.C. D.O.C.; CORRECTIONAL

MEDICAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(8:06-cv-01954-AW)

Submitted: October 31, 2007 Decided: November 15, 2007

Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip

Melton Andrews, Katrina J. Dennis, KRAMON & GRAHAM, Baltimore,

Maryland, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Williams appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint against the

Warden of the Maryland Reception Diagnostic and Classification

Center and Correctional Medical Services, Inc. We have reviewed

the record and affirm the district court’s dismissal of Williams’

claims for the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams

v. Warden, No. 8:06-cv-01954-AW (D. Md. filed Jan. 18, 2007;

entered Jan. 22, 2007). We also affirm the district court’s denial

of Williams’ motion to amend because the amendment would have been

futile, see United States v. Smith, 395 F.3d 516, 519 (4th Cir.

2005); United States v. Pittman, 209 F.3d 314, 317 (4th Cir. 2000),

and deny Williams’ motion for the appointment of counsel. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 3.01

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     OF THE
               AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                DOUBLECLICK INC.

    DoubleClick Inc. (the 'Corporation'), a corporation organized and existing
under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of Delaware, does hereby
certify that:

    1. The name of the Corporation is DoubleClick Inc.

    2. The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended by
striking out the second and third sentences of Article IV, Section A thereof and
by substituting in lieu thereof the following:

    'The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation shall have
    authority to issue is Four Hundred Five Million shares. Four Hundred
    Million (400,000,000) shares, par value $0.001 per share, shall be
    Common Stock and Five Million (5,000,000) shares, par value $0.001 shall
    be Preferred Stock.'

    3. The amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation herein certified has
been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Sections 228 and 242 of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.



<PAGE>


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, DOUBLECLICK INC. has caused this Certificate to be
signed by Kevin J. O'Connor, its Chief Executive Officer, who hereby
acknowledges under penalties of perjury that the facts herein stated are true
and that this certificate is the act and deed of the Corporation, this 24 day of
May, 1999.

                                  DOUBLECLICK INC.

                                  By:      /S/ KEVIN J. O'CONNOR
                                      ..................................
                                      Name:  Kevin J. O'Connor
                                      Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                             Chairman of the Board of Directors
#### Graciela MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant v. PRESTIGE FORD GARLAND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, doing business as Prestige Ford, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-10789.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Jan. 14, 2005.

John Edward Wall, Jr., Law Offices of John E. Wall Jr., Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Jennifer S. Stoddard, Blume *&*Stoddard, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

We affirm the grant of summary judgment to defendant for essentially the reasons stated by Judge Lindsay in his detailed memorandum opinion.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.