alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 Certification of the Principal Executive Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Michael Caporale, Jr., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of AMH Holdings, Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and  c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: April 1, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Michael Caporale, Jr.Michael Caporale, Jr.
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
No. 14,613.

#### Boswell, Administratrix, *v.*Boswell et al.

Filed Feb. 19, 1889.

From the Benton Circuit Court.

*N. W. Bliss, T. L. Merrick*and *H. S. Travis,*for appellant.

*H. W. Chase, F. S. Chase*and *F. W. Chase,*for appellees.

Elliott, C. J. —

For the reason given in *Smythe*v. *Boswell, ante, p. 365,*and upon the authorities there cited, this appeal is dismissed.
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 544 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                 House Calendar No. 253
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 544

                          [Report No. 105-729]

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 1998

   Mr. McInnis, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

    Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on Wednesday, 
September 23, 1998, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House 
suspend the rules. The object of any motion to suspend the rules shall 
be announced from the floor at least two hours prior to its 
consideration. The Speaker or his designee shall consult with the 
Minority Leader or his designee on the designation of any matter for 
consideration pursuant to this resolution.




                                                 House Calendar No. 253

105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 544

                          [Report No. 105-729]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 17, 1998

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONFURNISHED PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Pliant Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Harold C. Bevis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)    The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
|        |     | /s/ HAROLD  C. BEVIS      |
|--------|----------|---------------------------|
|   |     | Harold C. Bevis           |
|   | * * | *Chief Executive Officer* |
|   |     |                      |
|   |     | August 14, 2007           |

 

#  

----
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
     PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Citizens Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Lark E. Wysham, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Lark E. Wysham
-----------------------------
Lark E. Wysham
Chief Financial Officer
August 9, 2004
Continuing Education Units

VERIFICATION OF ATTENDANCE FORM

Certification Number: ________________

 attended the following professional educational activity. 

(NAME)

Title: NICE Webinar: Community-Based Partnerships for Cybersecurity 

Date(s): June 21, 2023 CEU Hours Earned: 1 hr 

Sponsor(s): National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 

Explanation of Event: This webinar will explore the foundations for creating multistakeholder, community-based partnerships 

that can lead to good jobs in cybersecurity. Attendees will also hear about the latest labor market trends in cybersecurity as 

seen through LinkedIn’s unique data. Webinar attendees will hear presentations from: 

• Francie Genz, Co-Principal and Co-Founder, Institute for Networked Communities (INC) 

• Erik Cherkaski, Senior Manager, Jobs for the Future (JFF)

Location: Virtual Webinar; https://www.nist.gov/news-events/events/2023/06/nice-webinar-community-based- 

 partnerships-cybersecurity 

Name of Meeting Host: Danielle Santos, Manager of Communications and Operations and Lead for 

 International Engagement, NICE 

 

Contact Information:

nist.gov/nice 

nice@nist.gov

The Continuing Education Units form is provided as a courtesy. It is the responsibility of the 

attendee to complete and submit with their certifying authority.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7138

DAVID MEYERS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DIRECTOR HAROLD CLARKE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. James P. Jones, District Judge. (7:18-cv-00435-JPJ-PMS)

Submitted: April 18, 2019 Decided: April 29, 2019

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Meyers, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

David Meyers appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of 

mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. See

Schlagenhauf v. Holder, 379 U.S. 104, 111 n.8 (1984) (stating that issuance of writ of 

mandamus is a matter of discretion with the court to which the petition is addressed). 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Meyers v. Clarke, 

7:18-cv-00435-JPJ-PMS (W.D. Va. Sept. 7, 2018). We also deny Meyers’ motions to 

seal the case and for in camera assistance. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

ANSI/NIST FingerprintStandard Workshop

Identification Flats

Gaithersburg, MDApril, 2005

Tom Hopperthopper@leo.gov

2

Flats Standard

Reduce fingerprint capture failures by adopting a simpler capture process

• What are Identification Flats?

• N-FACS Study Results

• Flats Standard Requirements– Tall Platen

– Segmentation

– Image Quality Scores

• Los Angles Study on Latent Searching

3

Identification Flats

4

Sequence Flats

5

Sequence Flats

6

N-FACS Results

Segmented Seq. Flats

Cross Match 

2”

HeimannLS23”

RolledInk

Livescan Rolled

Dual Sub 94.3% 97.6% 93.8%

Flats only 95.9% 97.7%

Ohio Idents 94.5% 96.7%

ODRC 96.1% 98.3% 98.5%

Seg Vendor A 65.4% 95.9%

Seg Vendor B 78.9% 97.0%

POC: Gary Williams  (304) 625-2849

7

Flats Standard

Reduce fingerprint capture failures by adopting a simpler capture process

• What are Identification Flats?

• N-FACS Study Results

• Flats Standard Requirements– Tall Platen

– Segmentation

– Image Quality Scores

• Los Angles Study on Latent Searching

8

Tall Platen• Simple robust capture protocol

• Reduced training requirement

• Better finger registration/quality

• No finger sequence errors

• No rotation/ More reliable segmentation

• 2.25 mega pixels

Faster, Easier, more Accurate

9

Type

-14 

Imag

e R

ecor

d

10

Type

-14 

Imag

e R

ecor

d

IQM=4

IQM=5

IQM=5

IQM=5

11

Flats Standard

Reduce fingerprint capture failures by adopting a simpler capture process

• What are Identification Flats?

• N-FACS Study Results

• Flats Standard Requirements– Tall Platen

– Segmentation

– Image Quality Scores

• Los Angles Study on Latent Searching

12

Los Angles Study

Candidate List for 1805 Ident Searches10/12/2003  - 5/27/2004

Currently about 2% of the records are composite(3rd set is ‘best’ images)

About 92% of the records include flats

13

Rolls Candidate List

Candidate Score

002357              1705

102588              1633

107843              1403

045512              1145

310492              1022

202301                917

110235                902

14

Rolls + Flats + Recidivist

Candidate Score

F

R

R

R

F

F

R

002357              1989

002357              1705

107843              1603

002357              1571

002357              1379

002357              1246

002357              1238

15

Ident Candidates

Candidates 1 2 3 4 5 6

Searches 646 797 110 123 51 78

2.1 ident candidates per search on average

16

Ident Candidates

Flats only 224 12.4%

Rolls only 502 27.8%

Both 1079 59.8%

Total 1805 100%
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

DANIEL CURRY; TYRONE HARRIS; 

NICHOLAS MASON; and TYECHIA 

WEBB; individually and on behalf of 

others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware 

corporation; and COURIER LOGISTICS 

SERVICES, L.L.C., a Florida limited 

liability company; 

Defendants.

Case No. CV 16-0007-PHX-JAT 

ORDER 

THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the Parties’ Stipulation and Proposed Order of 

Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 48). Upon review of the Stipulation, and for good cause, 

IT IS ORDERED that: 

1. Plaintiffs’ Complaint and their claims against Defendants are hereby DISMISSED 

WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear his, her, or its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 

2. This case is CLOSED. 

Dated this 25th day of July, 2016. 

Case 2:16-cv-00007-JAT Document 49 Filed 07/25/16 Page 1 of 1
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 4

Authorizing the Clerk to inform the President of the election of the Speaker

and the Clerk.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 7, 1997

Mr. ARMEY submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Authorizing the Clerk to inform the President of the election of the Speaker

and the Clerk.

Resolved, That the Clerk be instructed to inform the

President of the United States that the House of Representatives has elected Newt Gingrich, a Representative from the

State of Georgia, Speaker; and Robin H. Carle, a citizen of

the Commonwealth of Virginia, Clerk of the House of Representatives of the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

Æ
#### Sally Jackson's Heirs *v.*Jane Dunean, etc.

Estoppel — Sale of Interest In Land — Long Acquiescence.

, Whether or not our statutes converting fee tail into fee simple made appellee’s estate in the land a fee simple, she and her voluntary devisee are estopped by the sale to the mother of the appellants by her children. When covert and discovert she persistently and notoriously claimed only a life estate, conceding to her children the remainder, promoted the sale of that remainder for a valuable consideration, was present when it was conveyed and neither then nor ever since until about the time of the institution of this suit, intimated a claim to the remainder.

APPEAL PROM MADISON CIRCUIT COURT.

December 17, 1870.

*691
      *Burnam, for appellants.*

*Turner & Green, for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Robertson :

Whatever may be the technical effect of the devise to Mrs. Dunean and “the heirs of her body to hold” to herself and her “heirs” it is not necessary in this case to decide.

Whether our statute converting fee tail into fee simple made her estate in the land a fee simple, we adjudge that she and her voluntary devisee are estopped by the sale to the mother of the appellants by her children. When covert and discovert she persistently and notoriously claimed only a life estate conceding to hr children the remainder, promoted the sale of that remainder for a valuable and commensurable consideration, was present when it was conveyed and neither then nor ever since until about the time of the institution of this suit for enjoining waste, a period of more than twenty years, intimated a claim to the remainder.

We may presume that she desired that her children should enjoy the remainder, whatever her title may have been, and that she was more than willing that they should, as they did anticipate the enjo3rment by converting it into money which they may have needed. And, had she not, after she was ninety years old, conveyed the remainder to her grandson, her children’s conveyance would probably never have been questioned or in any way disturbed by her will or otherwise. The conveyance to her coappellee was not only voluntar)'- but was made pendente lite, presumptively for the sole purpose of disturbing the title of appellants which might not be otherwise jeopardized.

Her age and former conduct, and the time and occasion, all indicate this. Then, shall such a contrivance defeat a title for which her children with her privity and long acquiescence, had been paid, to her advantage and greatly to their own? Not with our sanction.

Instead of dismissing the 'petition and dissolving the injunction the circuit court ought to have perpetuated the injunction and removed the incumbrance on the title of the appellants by cancelling the conveyance to Adams, the appellee.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded for the decree just indicated.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed 

March 5, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00979-CV

IN RE ALBERT ORTIZ, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

164th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2006-61178

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On December 11, 2014, relator Albert Ortiz filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); see also 

Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable 

Alexandra Smoots-Hogan, presiding judge of the 164th District Court of Harris 

County, to set aside her November 12, 2014 summary judgment order, which 

precludes relator from bringing additional claims on remand.
2

Relator has not established that he is entitled mandamus relief. Accordingly, 

we deny relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus. We also deny relator’s motion 

for emergency relief. 

 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and McCally.
CERTIFICATION

I, Andrew Boetius, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Index Oil & Gas Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
controls over financial reporting.





Date: April 10, 2006

                                     /s/ Andrew Boetius
                                     ------------------
                                     Andrew Boetius
                                     Chief Financial Officer
. . . .

._ -.

. . .. . ...* OFFICE OF THE ATI-ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN



# ate4

??y paas\ ;yught itiavbg Uu. - -

## T&e **opllw&u**

**@f the** **Cowtl of**  **thlr Mate**  **hue a&**  **beea unlfora**  **upan the**  **qwrtloa but**  **the** 

### lateatexpreul~ ti vithalthe roundeat aenelushn, ve thhk, rerpeet matter 

### la rouadla Werleao v. Uhltnej, 234 8. If. W) 1047,

? **oplnloa** 

### by **Ju&e Sudley,**  

### adopted **bj the**  **ihproaa Cmn**  **’ $**  **J&wiry 3,**  **1940. Intha**  **oowae ofhla**  **OpinionJudgo Wedby**  **r&L&**

***** . . l s t a a d w a tl me, h Qlmv w , umv kI l o v a aad .wed, la that vhlch uaa srkblhhed u the

**mnuaad4ItUdwdtlufweaohmnevuflxed** bamed o n t he

m aa ue o nwle a l

t & s e o f I ii p e o lfl u i d 0 g r~ 

## or 2u4&t*.. m a 4 1 h a a . b e t s a

p x 4 w d

in t h 0 l o o a d r du, t he rtm t me o f

~ vhl a h li o n@í l r de8l g 4 a t ed

b y t he u t u u nit ed

~s t a it u

e a n d w d o e 4 t r a l

t!a c rí,:j.;:. 

### Ranarablc Bert Fwdr SW* 3 2oAurlunJurir adrrrar 

### The ao*t Judia

&y 4 !ztk%

### 8whU opo~aaIl62~0$te~ ef **ocJun,aotlc%$vh%nr%- q&red**  

### by lav, fi2lngof appealbaado,rpPlfmtion8 fw writ8 ,~ferror,a&w undern pier, and the like.
ILND 450 (Rev. 10/13) Judgment in a Civil Action

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Demetrius Hill,

Petitioner(s),

v.

Ciolli, et al.,

Respondent(s).

Case No. 20-cv-50281

Judge Iain D. Johnston 

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Judgment is hereby entered (check appropriate box):

in favor of plaintiff(s)

and against defendant(s)

in the amount of $ ,

which includes pre–judgment interest. 

does not include pre–judgment interest.

Post-judgment interest accrues on that amount at the rate provided by law from the date of this judgment. 

Plaintiff(s) shall recover costs from defendant(s).

in favor of defendant(s) 

and against plaintiff(s)

.

Defendant(s) shall recover costs from plaintiff(s).

other: Judgment entered in favor of Respondents and against Petitioner. Case closed.

This action was (check one):

tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. 

tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision was reached. 

decided by Judge Iain D. Johnston on a motion to dismiss.

Date: 1/10/2022 Thomas G. Bruton, Clerk of Court

\s\Yvonne Pedroza, Deputy Clerk

Case: 3:20-cv-50281 Document #: 60 Filed: 01/10/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:577