alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

Cedar Lane Technologies, Inc.,

Plaintiff,

v.

Motorola Mobility LLC, 

Defendant.

Case No. 1:20-cv-03600-ARW

Patent Case

Jury Trial Demanded

PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff Cedar Lane 

Technologies, Inc., hereby dismisses Defendant Motorola Solutions, Inc. without prejudice.

Defendant Motorola Solutions, Inc. has not yet answered the Complaint or moved for summary 

judgment.

Dated: July 10, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Isaac Rabicoff_____

Isaac Rabicoff

Rabicoff Law LLC

72 W Monroe Street

Chicago, IL 

(773) 669-4590

isaac@rabilaw.com

Counsel for Plaintiff

Cedar Lane Technologies, Inc.

Case: 1:20-cv-03600 Document #: 7 Filed: 07/10/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:429
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing document was served on all parties 

who have appeared in this case on July 10, 2020, via the Court's CM/ECF system.

/s/ Isaac Rabicoff____

Isaac Rabicoff

Case: 1:20-cv-03600 Document #: 7 Filed: 07/10/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:430
3

SO ORDERED this ________ day of ______________, ______.

________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case: 1:20-cv-03600 Document #: 7 Filed: 07/10/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:431
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.1

Eastern Division

Demetrius Johnson

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04156

Honorable Sara L. Ellis

Reynaldo Guevara, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, July 18, 2024:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The Court grants Defendants'

motion for extension of time [356]. Defendants' replies and motion to strike are due by

8/9/2024. The Court revise the briefing schedule on Defendants' motion to strike:

Plaintiff's response is due by 8/23/2024 and Defendants' reply is due by 8/30/2024. This is

the final extension. Mailed notice (ags)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04156 Document #: 358 Filed: 07/18/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:52269
**EXHIBIT 35.2**

** **

ANNUAL MASTER SERVICER’S CERTIFICATE

 

WELLS FARGO DEALER FLOORPLAN MASTER NOTETRUST

 

March 24, 2017

 

The undersigned, aduly authorized officer of GE Capital US Holdings, Inc. (“GE Capital US”), as the master servicer (the “MasterServicer”), pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement dated as of July 11, 2014 (as may be furtheramended and supplemented from time to time, the “Agreement”), between Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wells FargoDealer Floorplan Master Note Trust (“Trust”), does hereby certify that:

 

1.       GECapital US performed duties as Master Servicer from January 1, 2016 to 12:01 a.m. (New York time) on March 1, 2016.

 

2.       Areview of the activities of Master Servicer during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the “reporting period”),and of its performance under the Agreement, has been made under my supervision.

 

3.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the reporting period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has duly executed this certificate the date first above written.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 310

Calling on the Emir of Kuwait to provide funds for research, diagnosis,

treatment, and compensation relating to injuries and illnesses suffered

by United States veterans who served in the Persian Gulf War.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 6, 1997

Mr. DUNCAN introduced the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Calling on the Emir of Kuwait to provide funds for research,

diagnosis, treatment, and compensation relating to injuries and illnesses suffered by United States veterans

who served in the Persian Gulf War.

Whereas during the Persian Gulf War, 679,000 United

States forces fought to liberate Kuwait;

Whereas during the Persian Gulf War, United States forces

were exposed to low-level chemical warfare agents, pollution from blazing oil wells, and radioactive depleted uranium toxic wastes;

Whereas 155,000 United States veterans of the Persian Gulf

War have sought medical care from the Department of

Veterans Affairs for conditions that may be attributable

to their Gulf War service;
2

•HRES 310 IH

Whereas the Veterans of the Persian Gulf War Association

estimates that research, diagnosis, treatment, and compensation for United States veterans of the Persian Gulf

War will exceed $1,000,000,000 per year during their

lifetimes;

Whereas due to the courage and sacrifice of United States

forces, Kuwait has been restored as a world leader in oil

production and per capita income; and

Whereas Mohammed Al-Sabah, Ambassador of Kuwait, has

failed to respond to congressional or public inquiries regarding compensation for United States veterans: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives calls on

2 Jabir Al-Sabah, Emir of Kuwait, to provide funds for re3 search, diagnosis, treatment, and compensation relating to

4 the injuries and illnesses suffered by United States veter5 ans who served in the Persian Gulf War, until funds for

6 such purposes can be obtained from Iraq.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3855 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 565
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                               H. R. 3855

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 21, 2004

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

                              June 7, 2004

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 607 Pershing Drive in Laclede, Missouri, as the ``General John J. 
                        Pershing Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 607 
Pershing Drive in Laclede, Missouri, shall be known and designated as 
the ``General John J. Pershing Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``General John J. Pershing 
Post Office''.

                                                       Calendar No. 565

108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3855

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 607 Pershing Drive in Laclede, Missouri, as the ``General John J. 
                        Pershing Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 7, 2004

                       Reported without amendment
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ILLINOIS REPUBLICAN PARTY, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

No.

v. 

J.B. PRITZKER, as governor, CORPORATE & AFFILIATE 

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Defendant.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 and N.D. Ill. Local R. 3.2, Plaintiffs state 

• The Illinois Republican Party is a registered corporation with the Illinois 

Secretary of State. As a nonprofit corporation, it has no shareholders.

• Will County Republican Central Committee, Schaumburg Township 

Republican Organization, and Northwest Side GOP Club—are currently 

unincorporated associations with no publicly held corporate members.

Dated: June 15, 2020 Respectfully Submitted, 

ILLINOIS REPUBLICAN PARTY, 

WILL COUNTY REPUBLICAN 

CENTRAL COMMITTEE,

SCHAUMBURG TOWNSHIP 

REPUBLICAN ORGANIZATION,

NORTHWEST SIDE GOP CLUB

 By: /s/ Daniel R. Suhr

Daniel R. Suhr

Jeffrey M. Schwab 

Liberty Justice Center

190 South LaSalle Street, Suite 1500

Chicago, Illinois 60603

Telephone (312) 263-7668 

dsuhr@libertyjusticecenter.org 

jschwab@libertyjusticecenter.org

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case: 1:20-cv-03489 Document #: 2 Filed: 06/15/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:11
H. Res. 400

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 27, 1998.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and

that they are hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: Mrs.

Capps of California.

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE: Mrs. Capps of California.

COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Mr. Baldacci of Maine and Mr. Berry of Arkansas.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### STATE v. BARNES

No. 66A97

Case below: 125 N.C.App. 75

Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals allowed 8 May 1997. Notice of appeal by defendants (substantial constitutional question) retained 8 May 1997.
#### Joseph Pollock, Receiver, etc., *v.*W. F. Harding, etc.

Sheriff and Constables — Default on County Dues Collected — County Proper Party to Sue.

Where a sheriff fails to pay oyer taxes collected for a county to the proper custodian, the county is the proper party to institute proceedings therefor, and not the custodian of the county funds.

APPEAL FROM GREENUP CIRCUIT COURT.

January 25, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

By an act approved March 1867, entitled an act for the benefit of negroes and mullatoes of this commonwealth, Sess., Acts 1867, page 94, it is provided that the capitation and other taxes collected from negroes and mullatoes shall be set apart and constitute a separate fund for the support of their paupers and the education of their children.

Under this enactment a capitation tax and taxes on the taxable property of the negroes and mullatoes of Greenup county were levied in 1868 amounting to $112.61, which were collected by the sheriff of said county and, failing to pay it over to appellant, the receiver appointed by the county court under the act supra, there being no treasurer for that county, he brought this action in his own name as receiver against the sheriff and his sureties on his bond. The sheriff made no denfense and judgment went against him by default, but his sureties controverting in their answer their liability on final hearing the petition as to them, was dismissed and the receiver Pollock has appealed.

‘ The sheriff and his sureties are liable on their bond for this tax, as much so as for other county levies and taxes, they were assessed and made collectable as other county dues. But as the statute under which the assessments were made fails to prescribe the mode and declare in whose name the action must-*586be brought against the defaulting sheriff, the remedy must be in conformity to the general law on the subject.

*W. J. Sands, for appellants.*

*Dulin, for appellees.*

By the last paragraph of Sec. 6, Art. 2, Chap. 26, R. S., 2 vol., p. 299, the county court is authorized to prosecute an action or motion on the bond if the sheriff or collector of the county dues, etc. The appellant had no interest in the money sued for, being the mere custodian of the funds, subject to the control of the county court, and the action should have been in the name of the county court.

The answer presented no defense to the action but as it was improperly brought it was not error in the court below to dismiss the petition as to appellees, as that dismissal will not bar an action in the name of the county court for the amount collected.

Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed.*
Case 4:16-cr-00184-RM-LAB Document 28 Filed 02/12/16 Page 1 of 11
Case 4:16-cr-00184-RM-LAB Document 28 Filed 02/12/16 Page 2 of 11
Case 4:16-cr-00184-RM-LAB Document 28 Filed 02/12/16 Page 3 of 11
Case 4:16-cr-00184-RM-LAB Document 28 Filed 02/12/16 Page 4 of 11
Case 4:16-cr-00184-RM-LAB Document 28 Filed 02/12/16 Page 5 of 11
Case 4:16-cr-00184-RM-LAB Document 28 Filed 02/12/16 Page 6 of 11
Case 4:16-cr-00184-RM-LAB Document 28 Filed 02/12/16 Page 7 of 11
Case 4:16-cr-00184-RM-LAB Document 28 Filed 02/12/16 Page 8 of 11
Case 4:16-cr-00184-RM-LAB Document 28 Filed 02/12/16 Page 9 of 11
Case 4:16-cr-00184-RM-LAB Document 28 Filed 02/12/16 Page 10 of 11
Case 4:16-cr-00184-RM-LAB Document 28 Filed 02/12/16 Page 11 of 11
H. Res. 542

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 17, 1998.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 4569) making appropriations for foreign operations, export financing, and related programs for the fiscal

year ending September 30, 1999, and for other purposes. The

first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. Points of

order against consideration of the bill for failure to comply

with clause 1(b) of rule X, clause 2(l)(6) of rule XI, or clause

7 of rule XXI are waived. General debate shall be confined

to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the

bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute

rule for a period not to exceed five hours. The bill shall be

considered as read through page 141, line 18. Points of order

against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause
2

•HRES 542 EH

2 or 6 of rule XXI are waived. No amendment to the bill

shall be in order except: (1) pro forma amendments for the

purpose of debate; (2) amendments printed in the portion of

the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in

clause 6 of rule XXIII; and (3) amendments printed in the

report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each of the amendments printed in the report of the

Committee on Rules may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, may be offered only at the appropriate

point in the reading of the bill, shall be considered as read,

shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally

divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent,

shall not be subject to amendment except as specified in the

report, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of

the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole.

All points of order against the amendments printed in the report are waived. The Chairman of the Committee of the

Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without

intervening business, provided that the minimum time for

electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall

be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill
3

•HRES 542 EH

for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill

to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on

the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of
Ecolocap Solutions Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here
of (the "report"), I, Tri Vu Truong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated this 15th day of April,
2009





TRI VU
TRUONG


Tri Vu
Truong


Chief
Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6086

THOMAS L. GOODMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

CHARLES FRANCE,

Plaintiff,

versus

RON ANGELONE; S. MURPHY; LONNIE M. SAUNDERS;

JACK LEE; CHERYL MILLER; P. A. LAWHORN; LARRY

HUFFMAN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-95-1368-R)

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 1, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas L. Goodman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Goodman v. Angelone, No. CA-95-1368-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 27,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 422

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that law enforcement

officers who have died in the line of duty should be honored, recognized,

and remembered for their great sacrifice.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 7, 1998

Mr. BURTON of Indiana (for himself, Mr. ARMEY, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. DELAY,

Mr. SOLOMON, Mr. HYDE, Mr. LIVINGSTON, Mr. ARCHER, Mr. GILMAN,

Mr. GOODLING, Mr. BLILEY, Mr. GOSS, Mr. SPENCE, Mr. STUMP, and

Mr. TALENT) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

law enforcement officers who have died in the line of

duty should be honored, recognized, and remembered

for their great sacrifice.

Whereas law enforcement officers work daily in communities

across the Nation, assisting individuals in the pursuit of

life, liberty, and happiness;

Whereas law enforcement officers are, most often, the first

contact individuals have with their representatives of government, and they perform the duties and responsibilities

of that important liaison role with wisdom and compassion;
2

•HRES 422 IH

Whereas law enforcement officers are expected to perform duties above and beyond those of the average person, including duties such as rescuing individuals from a multitude of life-threatening incidents and assisting families

during times of great personal sorrow;

Whereas law enforcement officers engage in a variety of

tasks, from visiting with home-bound elderly citizens, mediating domestic disputes, and providing counsel to

youngsters on our streets, to retrieving lost pets and

bringing a spirit of friendship and compassion to an environment often lacking in these essential qualities;

Whereas law enforcement officers daily encounter individuals

within our society who reject all moral values and ethical

codes of conduct in pursuit of criminal activities;

Whereas law enforcement officers risk their health, lives, and

future happiness with their families in order to safeguard

communities from criminal predation;

Whereas in the course of their duties, law enforcement officers may find themselves not only in harm’s way, but

also victims of violent crime; and

Whereas 159 law enforcement officers throughout the country

lost their lives in the performance of their duty in 1997,

and more than 14,000 men and women have made that

supreme sacrifice to date: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the contributions made by law enforce3 ment officers killed in the line of duty should be honored,

4 their dedication and sacrifice recognized, and their unself5 ish service to the Nation remembered.

Æ
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued
our reports dated March 15, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of QC Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statement of QC Holdings, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-119167, effective September 21, 2004).



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP              
|                                    
|Kansas City, Missouri
March 15, 2011