alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Annual Report of REGI U.S., Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending April 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James Vandeberg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|1. | I have reviewed the Report;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any
      untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
      necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
      which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
      covered by the Report; and
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|3. | based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
      other financial information included in the Report, fairly present in all
      material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash
      flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the
      Report.                      

Date: February 7, 2008

/s/ James VandebergJames Vandeberg, Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.1

Eastern Division

Demetrius Johnson

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04156

Honorable Sara L. Ellis

Reynaldo Guevara, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, February 9, 2024:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: In court motion hearing held

on 2/7/2024 and continued to 2/29/2024 at 1:45 PM. The Court grants Defendant City of

Chicago's motion for extension of time [299]. Plaintiff should provide a response to

Defendant's draft motion by 2/14/2024. The parties should file their motion to resolve

factual disputes by 2/23/2024. The Court strikes the hearing date set for 2/14/2024 and

resets it to 2/29/2024 at 1:45 PM. The parties are ordered to appear in person in courtroom

1403. Mailed notice. (kp, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04156 Document #: 304 Filed: 02/07/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:13287
#### Baboucar B. TAAL; Guylaine L. Taal, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. Patricia ZWIRNER, et al., Defendants, Appellees.

No. 04-1463.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Jan. 11, 2005.

Baboucar B. Taal and Guylaine L. Taal on brief pro se.

Fred J. Desmarais, Debra L. Mayotte and Desmarais, Ewing & Johnston, PLLC on brief for appellees Patricia Zwirner and Douglas Zwirner.

Christopher J. Pyles and Wiggin & Nourie, P.A. on brief for appellee Kim Lacey.

Russell F. Hilliard and Upton & Hatfield, LLP on brief for appellee State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.

Before TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge, CAMPBELL, Senior Circuit Judge, and SELYA, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

After carefully considering the record and briefs on appeal, we *affirm*for substantially the reasons stated by the district court.

At summary judgment, the appellants failed to produce any evidence that would tend to show a genuine dispute of material fact concerning any claim. That is a fatal defect. *Griggs-Ryan v. Smith,*904 F.2d 112, 115 (1st Cir.1990).

We would add that among other problems, their claims against Douglas Zwirner were properly dismissed on the ground of res judicata. *In re Colonial Mortgage Bankers Corp.,*324 F.3d 12, 15 (1st Cir. 2003). Their claims against others arising from alleged perjury were properly dismissed on the ground of immunity. *Stoutt v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico,*320 F.3d 26, 33 (1st Cir.2003). And they offered no evidence that any defendant conspired to hinder or abridge protected rights. *Santiago v. Canon U.S.A., Inc.,*138 F.3d 1, 6 (1st Cir.1998); *Cadle Co. v. Hayes,*116 F.3d 957, 960 (1st Cir.1997); *Libertad v. Welch,*53 F.3d 428 (1st Cir.1995).

*Affirmed.*1st Cir. Rule 27(c).
IV

House Calendar No. 264

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 567

[Report No. 105–764]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 4101) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies programs

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1999, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 2, 1998

Mr. SOLOMON, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 4101) making appropriations

for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1999, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 4101) making appropriations for

4 Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Adminis-
2

HRES 567 RH

1 tration, and Related Agencies programs for the fiscal year

2 ending September 30, 1999, and for other purposes. All

3 points of order against the conference report and against

4 its consideration are waived. The conference report shall

5 be considered as read.

6 SEC. 2. House Resolution 551 is laid on the table.

House Calendar No. 264

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 567

[Report No. 105–764]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference reSeptember 30, 1999, and for other purposes. ed Agencies programs for the fiscal year ending ment, Food and Drug Administration, and Relat- appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Develop- port to accompany the bill (H.R. 4101) making

OCTOBER 2, 1998

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
for the periods covered in the Report.
 April 24, 2007/s/ Carlos E. AgüeroCarlos E. AgüeroChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Patrick Bratton, certify that:

1. I have reviewed
this annual report on Form 10-K of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 31, 2006
|                     | 
|By:                  |  | /s/ Patrick Bratton    
|                     |  | Patrick Bratton        
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 606 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 20, 1998.
    Resolved, That any organizational caucus or conference in the House of 
Representatives for the One Hundred Sixth Congress may begin on or after 
November 13, 1998.
    Sec. 2. As used in this resolution, the term ``organizational caucus or 
conference'' means a party caucus or conference authorized to be called under 
section 202(a) of House Resolution 988, Ninety-third Congress, agreed to on 
October 8, 1974, and enacted into permanent law by chapter III of title I of the 
Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1975 (2 U.S.C. 29a(a)).
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
H. Res. 461

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 10, 1998.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2888) to amend the Fair Labor Standards Act

of 1938 to exempt from the minimum wage recordkeeping

and overtime compensation requirements certain specialized

employees. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed

with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall

not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

Education and the Workforce. After general debate the bill

shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute

rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for

the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the

amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the

Committee on Education and the Workforce now printed in

the bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a sub-
2

•HRES 461 EH

stitute shall be considered as read. During consideration of

the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of

the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of

whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to

be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman

of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time

during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole

a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting

on any postponed question that follows another electronic

vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum

time for electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration

of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have

been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in

the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of

the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the

nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final
3

•HRES 461 EH

passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
exv10w8



 





[Alberta Logo]

SUSTAINABLE RESOURCE

DEVELOPMENT




Subject to the Forests Act and The Timber Management Regulation



Timber Disposition Timber License DTLF 110001



is hereby granted to: Footner Forest Products Ltd. Box 1856, High Level, AB TOH 1ZO



on the Crown Lands described on the attached Appendix A and is subject to the
terms and conditions on the attached Schedule A.




	 	 	 
	Effective: April 23, 2002

	 	Expires: April 30, 2005







PERMANENT CONDITIONS:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	ESTIMATED	 	DUES
	A.	 	SPECIES	 	CONDITION	 	VOLUME (m3)	 	RATE ($/m3)
	

	 	A
	 	Green
	 	 	50,000	 	 	As per Timber Management Regulation.









	B.	 	PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE DEPOSIT: $4,320.00
	 
	C.	 	QUOTA CERTIFICATE NUMBER: DTAF110001 ANNUAL AUTHORIZED VOLUME: 22000m3
	 
	D.	 	ALL TIMBER MEETING OR EXCEEDING THE FOLLOWING DIAMETERS MUST BE CUT:





     CONIFEROUS:





	 	1.	 	STUMP DIAMETER — 15 CM MEASURED OUTSIDE BARK
	 
	 	2.	 	TOP DIAMETER — 11 CM MEASURED INSIDE BARK





     DECIDUOUS:





	 	1.	 	STUMP DIAMETER — 15 CM MEASURED OUTSIDE BARK
	 
	 	2.	 	TOP DIAMETER — 10 CM MEASURED INSIDE BARK




THIS DISPOSITION IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE FORESTS ACT,
PUBLIC LANDS ACT, FOREST PRAIRIE PROTECTION ACT, TIMBER MANAGEMENT REGULATION,
TIMBER REGULATIONS, FOREST AND PRAIRIE PROTECTION REGULATIONS, PARTS 1 AND II,
THE PROVINCIAL PLANNING AND HARVESTING GROUND RULES, AND ANY ACTS OR
REGULATIONS PASSED IN SUBSTITUTION THEREOF.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Signed:
	 	/s/ Dan Wilkinson
	

	 	 	 	
 
	

	 	FOR:
	 	MINISTER OF SUSTAINABLE RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT






NOTE: This timber disposition may be amended by the issuance of a separate form
TM37.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm:

Street address: 

City/State/Zip:

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel are you 

a

Federal Defender

CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this ourt an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this ourt’s

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 . . §1746, this

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

‹±2a ̈­ TMÚ ·TM·o Õaø ̈­Ù ‘‘› ÔÊÓðÛ1⁄2TMÛðÌÎÎÔ

 ·TM·o Õaø ̈­Ù ‘‘›

–ø ́¥ «±TMø2·1⁄2Ù ÷ÆÚ

ÕaßoøÆ ̈ ̧ Õ ̧ø© ‘‘–

ÓÌÌ Õ± ́ ̈ ̧ ...ø1⁄2μaÆ ‹Æ·TMaÙ Õ ́· ̈a Ëððð

› ̧·1⁄2ø1±Ù ×‘ ÍðÍðÍ

ÍÌÓÈËÔÎ ÌÔÓÛÏÍðÛÎððð

°ß±TMø2·1⁄2‡­aßoøÆ ̈ ̧Ú1⁄2±3

÷ ́2a ÎÙ ÓðÓÌ

Ï

Ï

Ï

Ï

–ø ́¥ «±TMø2·1⁄2

Case: 1:20-cv-03551 Document #: 68 Filed: 06/05/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:548
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 1999 10-Q OF FELCOR LODGING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          26,644
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,513
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,157
<PP&E>                                       4,225,293
<DEPRECIATION>                               (214,333)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,231,771
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          110,865
<BONDS>                                      1,671,191
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    295,000
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,102,804
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,231,771
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               126,917
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,422
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,067
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             38,067
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,067
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.45
        

</TABLE>
#### H. C. Smith, etc., *v.*W. J. Walker, etc.

Sales — Purchaser of Adulterated Whisky — Sale by Purchaser After Knowledge of Adulteration — Estoppel.

A purchaser of adulterated whisky is entitled to recover damages on his cross-petition, unless he sold the whisky after he was apprised of its being adulterated, in that event he is estopped to claim damages.

APPEAL PROM ESTILL CIRCUIT COURT.

November 21, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

The opinion heretofore rendered in this case adjudged that if the assignees of the note on the appellant surrendered the note on Johnson in consideration of the assignment to them that the obligors in the note were estopped as against the assignees from impeaching the legality of the original consideration. Instruction No. 4, given at the instance of the appellees, Walker, etc., embraces this view of the case and was in perfect accordance with the opinion of this court. The instructions asked for by the appellants were properly refused, and if not, the instructions given by the court in lieu of the instruction asked for, presented the defense of the appellants to the jury, or the law applicable thereto, in a plain and intelligible manner. The jury were told “that if the note sued on was given for whisky that contained poisonous substance and was not of the kind contracted for, and that defendant offered to rescind the contract and return the whisky, then the defendant’s right to avoid the payment of the note had not been waived or lost as against either Mize or to his assignees unless they believe as defined in instruction No. 4. This instruction, as ‘already stated, was to th effect that if the note on Johnson was surrendered by the assignees in consideration of the assignment (the proof showing that it was assigned at the instance of both the obligor and obligees) that the facts then constituted no defense as against the assignees. The jury was further told that although no such offer was made to rescind the contract and the jury should find for Walker the amount of the note, but at the same time they *720further find that the note was given on a contract for first proof whisky, and the whisky was sold by samples of good whisky, and that the whisky delivered was not such as was sold but was drugged and adulterated, etc., then on the counterclaim and cross-petition against Mize’s administrator they should find for Smith such damages as he sustained unless they believe that Smith sold said whisky after he was apprised of its being adulterated. The court below has presented the law of the case, so that the jury could not have been misled in regard to the issues made between these parties, and the evidence being conflicting and such as would authorize this court to sustain a finding for either party.

*H. C. Lilly, for appellants.*

*John Bennett, Turner & Smith, for appellees.*

The judgment must be affirmed.