alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Larry Heard, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03678

Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman

Trax Records Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, November 9, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Plaintiff to file a

response to defendants Trax Records Inc., Rachael Cain's motion to dismiss [14] by

12/7/2020. Defendants to file a reply by 12/21/2020. Once the matter is fully briefed, the

Court shall take it under advisement. Mailed notice. (ym, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
Order entered February 20, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01048

- CV

WILLIAM CHARLES BUND REN, KAREN BUNDREN, AND

WILLIAM MARK BUNDREN , Appellant s

V.

COLLI N CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT, COLLIN APPRAISAL REV IEW BOARD, JAMES TER ILLI, AND BO DAFFIN, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 416

- 05054

- 2017



### O RDER

Before the Court is the February 19, 2 019 motion of appellees Collin Appraisal Review

Board and James Terilli for an extension of time to file a brief. We GRANT the motion and

extend the time to March 5, 2019

.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosures controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Carlos E. AgüeroCarlos E. Agüero
          Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Hopkins Mastodin Iron, Mining & Manufacturing Coal Company *v.*D. R. Burbank.

APPEAL PROM HENDERSON CIRCUIT COURT.

March 7, 1872.

Process — Summons—How Executed on Company.

The officer’s return is — “Executed by delivering to Joel Lambert a true copy of the within summons.”

Held, that this is not such service on the company as is required by law.

.Opinion of the Court by

Judge Pryor:

The judgment in this case, as originally rendered, if not void was certainly erroneous, and would have been reversed on an appeal to this court.

The execution of the summons upon Joel Lambert was no evidence that Joel Lambert was president of the company against whom this suit was instituted. The officer's return is, “Executed by delivering to Joel Lambert a true copy of the within summons,” when the suit is against the Hopkins, Mastodin Coal Company, etc. This is not such a service of a summons upon the company as provided by law.

The appellants failing to answer the petition, a judgment by default was rendered against them, and in a few days thereafter, and during the term at which this judgment was given, the appellant moved to set aside the judgment in order that an answer might be filed in which they offer to plead payment. This plea is unfiled by Joel Lambert, who in reality was then president of the company.

When this motion was made by the appellant, the appellee proved by Joel Lambert that he was in fact president of the company, and this fact is made to appear in the bill of evidence, and no doubt caused the court to refuse the filing of the answer.

It seems to us that if the testimony offered and heard upon the motion to file the answer had the effect to cure the judgment already rendered, and which judgment was clearly erroneous, without evidence upon the record showing that Lambert was the president of the company, the court ought to have permitted the answer to be filed. This answer is unfiled by the witness, with *63the additional statement made by him under oath that this debt of the appellee had 'been fully paid by the company.

*James, for appellant.*

*Vance & Merritt, for appellee.*

The appellee was in no condition to have sustained his judgment in this court, without the evidence heard upon the motion of the appellant to file the answer.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to permit the appellant to file the answer and for further proceedings consistent herewith.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.22

April 5, 2004

Mr. Graham T. Allison, Jr.
Elisabeth Allison, Ph.D.
69 Pinehurst Road
Belmont, Massachusetts 02478

Dear Dr. and Mr. Allison:

      As you know, Color Kinetics Incorporated (the "Company") entered into a
letter agreement with you, dated December 14, 2001 (the "Letter Agreement") in
connection with the Series E Convertible Preferred Stock financing of the
Company. In the Letter Agreement, the Company agreed to use its best efforts
after the closing of the Series E Financing to secure the election as a director
of one person nominated by you and mutually agreed upon by the Company and the
Company's Board of Directors. At the time of the Letter Agreement it was the
intention of the Company and you that the Company's obligations under the Letter
Agreement would bind the Company only during the period prior to the initial
public offering of the Company's capital stock. In order to make this
understanding explicit, please sign in the space provided below to indicate your
agreement with the Company that the Letter Agreement shall terminate, and be of
no further force or effect, upon the closing of the Company's first public
offering of its capital stock pursuant to an effective registration statement
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

      Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this matter.


/s/ Elisabeth Allison                           Color Kinetics Incorporated
---------------------
Elisabeth Allison
                                                By:/s/George Mueller
/s/Graham Allison                                  -----------------
-----------------                               George Mueller
Graham Allison                                  Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 26, 2020

b0518 

# Order

Clerk May 26, 2020

160017(22)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 160017

COA: 349267

Branch CC: 84

- 094002

- FH

ROBERT LEO OSWALD,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsider at ion of this Court’s October 29

, 2019 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that

reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: J.Z. AND B.Z.,

MINORS

PETITION OF: J.Z., FATHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 467 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
Exhibit 10.5


 


April 23, 2004


 


Walter Wendland


P.O. Box 319


Fredericksburg, IA 50630


 


Dear Mr. Wendland:


 


This letter confirms the action
of the Board of Directors of Golden Grain Energy, LLC to extend an offer of
employment to you as its President.


 


The duties of the position are
defined in Golden Grain Energy’s Operating Agreement.


 


You will be compensated at an
annual salary of $80,000, payable in equal installments in accordance with the
normal pay periods established by the Company. 
You will be eligible for enrollment in the other employment benefits
available to all employees of the Company.


 


Your employment is at-will, and
can be terminated by you or by the Company at any time, with or without
notice.  Your performance will be
evaluated six months after startup.


 


We look forward to working with
you and working toward our mutual success.


 


Please indicate your acceptance
of these terms by signing below on or before May 10, 2004.


 


	
  Sincerely,

  
	
   

  
	
  /s/ Dave
  Sovereign

  	
   

  
	
  Dave
  Sovereign, Vice-President

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  Accepted:

  
	
   

  
	
  /s/ Walter
  Wendland

  	
   

  
	
  Walter
  Wendland

  	
  Date
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 694

To provide for a change with respect to the requirements for a Canadian

border boat landing permit pursuant to section 235 of the Immigration

and Nationality Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 12, 1997

Mr. LATOURETTE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide for a change with respect to the requirements

for a Canadian border boat landing permit pursuant

to section 235 of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CHANGE IN CANADIAN BORDER BOAT LANDING

4 PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.

5 Not later than 60 days after the date of the enact6 ment of this Act, the Attorney General, in consultation

7 with the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturaliza8 tion, shall issue revised regulations for the implementation

9 of section 235 of the Immigration and Nationality Act
2

•HR 694 IH

1 with respect to the requirement that certain individuals

2 entering the United States from Canada by boat obtain

3 a landing permit. The revised regulations shall provide

4 that, in the case of a United States citizen traveling in

5 a boat of not more than 65 feet in length (including a

6 boat used for commercial purposes) on a trip between the

7 United States and Canada of not more than 72 hours du8 ration, the citizen need not obtain such a permit if the

9 citizen carries a United States passport for the duration

10 of the trip, regardless of whether the citizen is a passenger

11 on, an owner of, or an operator of, the boat.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below
and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended, and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of Registrant.


                                     /s/ Thomas J. Corcoran, Jr.
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     Thomas J. Corcoran, Jr.
                                     Chief Executive Officer of FelCor Lodging
                                     Trust Incorporated, as general partner of
                                     FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7097
DAVID ATKINS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, of Middle River Regional Jail; DOCTOR QUINN; CATHY RILEY, Head Nurse, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:06-cv-00636-GEC) Submitted: December 20, 2007 Decided: December 27, 2007 Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Atkins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Rosalie Pemberton Fessier, TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, PC, Staunton, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: David Atkins, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Atkins v. Med. Dep’t of Middle River Reg’l Jail , No. 7:06-cv-00636-GEC (W.D. Va. July 10, 2007). Atkins’ motions for appointment of counsel, for trial by jury, and for a new trial and for judgment as a matter of law, and his request to reargue are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
H. Res. 511

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 29, 1998.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 629) to grant the consent of the Congress to

the Texas Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Compact.

All points of order against the conference report and against

its consideration are waived.

Attest:

Clerk.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"X-59 3D Printing","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"eZSNaITdHB\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/x-59-3d-printing\/\">X-59 3D Printing<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/x-59-3d-printing\/embed\/#?secret=eZSNaITdHB\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“X-59 3D Printing” — NASA\" data-secret=\"eZSNaITdHB\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/3d-print-models.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":325}
Exhibit 32.1.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I have reviewed the Amended Report of OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year
ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), and I, Richard L. Browdy, President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer) of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of and for the period covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |              |  |  |  |                                                         
|----- |  | ------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Date: |  | June 3, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Richard L. Browdy                                   
|      |  |              |  |  |  | Richard L. Browdy, President and Chief Financial Officer
|      |  |              |  |  |  | (Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements and the related prospectuses:



| | (1) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-161079) of Stereotaxis, Inc. pertaining to the Stereotaxis, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan and the Stereotaxis, Inc. 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-186124) of Stereotaxis, Inc. pertaining to the Stereotaxis, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-192606) of Stereotaxis, Inc. pertaining to the registration of up to $75 million of the Stereotaxis, Inc.s common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants, and/or
units
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our report dated March 27, 2014, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of Stereotaxis, Inc., included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2013.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

St. Louis, Missouri

May 2, 2014
ISO/IEC 19795 Biometric Performance Testing & Reporting Standards 

and Other Performance Testing-Related Standards

• “ISO/IEC 19795-1: Principles and framework

• ISO/IEC 19795-2: Testing methodologies for technology and scenario 

evaluation

• ISO/IEC TR 19795-3: Modality-specific testing

• ISO/IEC 19795-4: Interoperability performance testing 

• ISO/IEC 19795-5: Access control scenario and grading scheme 

• ISO/IEC 19795-6: Testing methodologies for operational evaluation

• ISO/IEC 19795-7: Testing of on-card comparison algorithms

• ISO/IEC TR 29156: Guidance for specifying performance requirements to 

meet security & usability needs in applications using biometrics

• ISO/IEC 29197: Evaluation methodology for environmental influence in 

biometric system performance

• ISO/IEC 29198: Characterization and measurement of difficulty for 

fingerprint databases for technology evaluation

• ISO/IEC 29120: Machine readable test data for biometric testing and 

reporting
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         |                                                                           |                                           |
|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|    |                                                                      |                                      |
|         |                                                                           | /s/                  Jean Dagenais   |
|         | Jean                      DagenaisChief                      Financial Officer |

----