alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                       |   |   |   |                              |
|----------------------------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------|
|                       |   |   |   |                         |
|                       |   |   |   |                         |
| ROBISON, HILL & CO.    |   |   |   | Certified Public Accountants |
| A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION |   |   |   |                         |
|                       |   |   |   | BRENT M. DAVIES, CPA         |
|                       |   |   |   | DAVID O. SEAL, CPA           |
|                       |   |   |   | W. DALE WESTENSKOW, CPA      |
|                       |   |   |   | BARRY D. LOVELESS, CPA       |
|                       |   |   |   | STEPHEN M. HALLEY, CPA       |

----
Exhibit 99.2
 
 Independent Accountant’s Report
 
 
 Structured Products Corp., as Depositor
 390 Greenwich Street
 New York, New York 10013
 
 U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee
 Corporate Trust Department
 100 Wall Street
 New York, NY 10005
 
 Re:
CorTS Trust II for Goldman Sachs Capital I (the “Trust”)
 
 Ladies and Gentlemen:
 
 We have examined management’s assertions that the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the provisions of the Base Trust Agreement dated as of December 15, 2000, as supplemented by the CorTS Trust II for Goldman Sachs Capital I Series Supplement, dated as of April 15, 2004 (together, the “Trust Agreement”), during the period covered by the annual report on Form 10-K filed by the Depositor on behalf of the Trust for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Annual Report”).  Management is responsible for compliance with the Trust Agreement. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertions based on our examination.
 
 Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Depositor’s and the Trustee’s compliance with the Trust Agreement and performing such other procedures as considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
 In our opinion, the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the Trust Agreement during the period covered by the Annual Report and management’s assertions with respect to such compliance are fairly stated, in all material respects, for the year ended December 31, 2013.
 
 
 
 
 /s/ Aston Bell, CPA
 
 New York, New York
 March 18, 2014
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

WHAM-O HOLDING, LTD. and 

INTERSPORT CORP. d/b/a WHAM-O, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”,

Defendants.

Case No.: 1:20-cv-04201

Judge Jorge L. Alonso

Magistrate Judge Heather M. McShain

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby files this Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal, without prejudice, as to the following Defendant(s) identified on Schedule A of the 

Complaint:

NO. DEFENDANT

63 bingobuy 

46 2018outdoorman 

157 motors_parts 

122 industrialmechanical 

114 health_home 

50 almach_21

169 richupdating

24 honest-trust

81 ed.ed17

53 andredl76

107 gravityex

Case: 1:20-cv-04201 Document #: 27 Filed: 10/23/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:3329
DATED: October 23, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt (Bar No. 6207971)

Keith Vogt, Ltd.

111 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1700

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Telephone: 312-675-6079

E-mail: keith@vogtip.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case: 1:20-cv-04201 Document #: 27 Filed: 10/23/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:3330
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document was electronically filed on October 23, 2020 with the Clerk of the Court using the 

CM/ECF system, which will automatically send an email notification of such filing to all registered 

attorneys of record.

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt

Case: 1:20-cv-04201 Document #: 27 Filed: 10/23/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:3331
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

JOHN M. MARSZALEK, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. 

BRENDAN KELLY, et al.,

Defendants,

BRUCE DAVIDSON, et al.

Plaintiff-Intervenors,

v. 

BRENDAN KELLY, et al.,

Defendants in Intervention. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 20-cv-4270

Hon. Mary M. Rowland

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendants, by their attorney, Kwame Raoul, Attorney General of Illinois, hereby move 

to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) 

and 12(b)(6) and in support thereof state as follows:

1. The Firearm Owners Identification Act (“FOID Card Act”) was enacted to regulate who 

may legally possess a firearm in Illinois and includes an application and review process. 430 

ILCS 65/1 et seq.

2. In their Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs allege that any delays in processing applications 

beyond thirty days violates their Second and Fourteenth Amendment rights. See ECF No. 40.

However, Plaintiffs’ claims fail and should be dismissed for several reasons.

Case: 1:20-cv-04270 Document #: 94 Filed: 07/09/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:548
2

3. First, the only remaining individual Plaintiff named in this lawsuit has received his FOID 

card and, as such, his claim is moot.

4. The claims of the Second Amendment Foundation (“SAF”) and Illinois State Rifle 

Association (“ISRA”) should be dismissed because they seek relief that cannot be issued by this 

Court, and because SAF and ISRA lack standing to bring this lawsuit on their own or on behalf 

of their members.

5. Moreover, Count I should be dismissed Plaintiffs have not adequately alleged that the 

Defendants have violated the Second Amendment.

6. Finally, Count II should be dismissed because Plaintiffs’ have not stated a viable 

Fourteenth Amendment claim.

WHEREFORE, Defendants respectfully request that this Court grant their motion to 

dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint.

July 9, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

KWAME RAOUL

Attorney General of Illinois

/s/ Mary A. Johnston

Mary A. Johnston

Office of the Illinois Attorney General

100 West Randolph Street

Chicago, Illinois 60601

(312) 814-3739

Counsel for Defendants

Case: 1:20-cv-04270 Document #: 94 Filed: 07/09/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:549
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing notice and referenced 

pleadings was served on all counsel of record via the Court’s CM/ECF system on the 9th day of 

July, 2021.

/s/ Mary A. Johnston

MARY A. JOHNSTON

Case: 1:20-cv-04270 Document #: 94 Filed: 07/09/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:550
#### Oliver Andrew Morris *v.*State of Indiana.

[No. 2-375A73.

Filed November 5, 1975.]

*394
      *James A. Neel,*of Indianapolis, for appellant.

*Theodore L. Sendak,*Attorney General, *Robert F. Alden,*Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

Per Curiam

The sole issue presented by Appellant Oliver Morris upon this appeal is whether the evidence is sufficient to support his conviction for second degree burglary.1

On the night of July 8, 1974 and during the early morning hours of July 9, 1974, Morris was present at a recreational facility owned and operated by Zell Cross. The facility included a gun club, several fishing lakes and a retail business for the sale of fishing tackle and sporting goods. Approximately fifteen to twenty persons had been granted permission to utilize the fishing facilities on the night of July 8. There was apparently no time limitation upon the exercise of those fishing privileges. Morris was among those authorized to fish upon this occasion. He had on many previous occasions used the fishing facilities and knew the nature of Zell’s business operation. Morris had frequently been inside the “bait shop” which the owner used for his retail sales operation and where rifles and shotguns were kept in a gun rack for sale purposes. The bait shop was secured at approximately 9:00 P.M. and was undisturbed at midnight when checked by the night watchman.

At approximately 3:30 A.M. the morning of July 9, the owner heard noises in or at the bait shop through an open microphone system between the bait shop and the owner’s bedroom and which system was used as a burglar alarm. The owner alerted the watchman who investigated and saw Morris exiting from the back door of the bait shop. A hole had been cut in the door beneath the lock. Approximately fif*395teen to seventeen shotguns, or shotguns and rifles, were strewn around, some outside the structure. Morris was detained by the owner and the watchman until police officers arrived and effected an arrest.

The evidence above recited, together with the reasonable inferences capable of being drawn therefrom, was sufficient to support the conviction. *Windle*v. *State*(1974), 161 Ind. App. 322, 316 N.E.2d 388; *Atkins*v. *State*(1974), 159 Ind. App. 387, 307 N.E.2d 73; *Parsons*v. *State*(1973), 159 Ind. App. 160, 304 N.E.2d 802; *Sargent*v. *State*(1973), 156 Ind. App. 469, 297 N.E.2d 459.

That Morris was not actually in physical possession of property from the bait house when first observed exiting through the back door does not alter our conclusion. *Chappell*v. *State*(1972), 258 Ind. 537, 282 N.E.2d 810; *McMullen*v. *State*(1975), 163 Ind. App. 333, 324 N.E.2d 162; *Atkins*v. *State, supra; Wilson*v. *State*(1973), 157 Ind. App. 648, 301 N.E.2d 392; *Sargent*v. *State, supra.*

Judgment affirmed.

Note. — Reported at 336 N.E.2d 707.

. 1C 1971, 35-13-4-4, Ind. Ann. Stat. § 10-701 (b) (Burns 1956).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

Bureau of Consumer Financial Case No. 1:20-cv-04176 

Protection, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Judge Franklin V. Valderrama 

Magistrate Judge Heather K. McShain 

Townstone Financial, Inc., and Barry Sturner, 

Defendants. 

STIPULATION 

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), all parties to this case stipulate to

dismissal with prejudice of all claims against the only individually named defendant, Barry

Sturner, with each party to pay its own costs, fees, and expenses. 

Dated: November 1, 2024. 

Respectfully submitted, 

CONSUMER FINANCIAL 

PROTECTION BUREAU 

/s/ Jacob A. Schunk 

JACOB A. SCHUNK (IA AT001908) 

jacob.schunk@cfpb.gov 

Tele: (202) 718-0394 

GREGORY W. JONES 

(IL ARDC #6313157) 

gregory.jones@cfpb.gov 

MARY OLSON (IL ARDC # 629733) 

mary.olson@cfpb.gov 

230 S. Dearborn St. 

Suite 1590 

Chicago, IL 60604 

and 

TOWNSTONE FINANCIAL, 

INC., AND BARRY STURNER 

/s/ Steven M. Simpson 

STEVEN M. SIMPSON 

DC Bar No. 462553 

ASHLEY TORKELSON LEVINE 

AZ Bar No. 032544 

Pacific Legal Foundation 

3100 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 610 

Arlington, VA, 22201 

Tel: (202) 888-6881 

SSimpson@pacificlegal.org 

ALevine@pacificlegal.org 

OLIVER DUNFORD 

FL Bar No. 017991 

Pacific Legal Foundation 

Case: 1:20-cv-04176 Document #: 134 Filed: 11/01/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:843
- 2 -

1700 G Street NW 

Washington, DC 20552 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

4440 PGA Boulevard, Suite 307 

Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 

Tel: (916) 503-9060 

ODunford@pacificlegal.org 

SEAN P. BURKE 

Mattingly Burke Cohen & Biederman LLP 

155 E. Market St. Suite 400 

Indianapolis, IN 46204 

MARX DAVID STERBCOW 

The Sterbcow Law Group LLC 

824 Elmwood Park Boulevard, Suite 205 

New Orleans, LA 70123 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Case: 1:20-cv-04176 Document #: 134 Filed: 11/01/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:844
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned hereby certifies that on November 1, 2024, I electronically filed the 

foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court via the CM/ECF system, which will cause a copy 

to be served upon counsel of record. 

/s/ Jacob A. Schunk 

JACOB A. SCHUNK 

Case: 1:20-cv-04176 Document #: 134 Filed: 11/01/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:845
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JESUS OCTAVIO SANDOVALTALAVERA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-10599

D.C. No. 2:08-cr-01333-DCB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 10, 2012** 

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Jesus Octavio Sandoval-Talavera appeals from the 24-month sentence

imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

SEP 24 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-10599

Sandoval-Talavera first contends that the district court procedurally erred by

failing to explain adequately the basis for imposing a consecutive sentence. The

record reflects that the court considered the parties’ arguments and adequately

explained the sentence. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir.

2008) (en banc).

Sandoval-Talavera next contends that his sentence is substantively

unreasonable. In light of Sandoval-Talavera’s lengthy criminal history, failure to

be deterred, and breach of trust, the sentence is substantively reasonable. See 18

U.S.C. § 3583(e); United States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1182 (9th Cir. 2006) (at

a revocation sentencing, a district court may sanction the defendant for his breach

of trust).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The  undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant  to, and as required  by, 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Geneva Financial Corp. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB for the period  ended  March 31,  2002 fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended,  and that  information  contained in such  Quarterly  Report on Form
10-QSB fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Dated: April 28, 2003
                                            By /s/ Keith S. Haffner
                                               ----------------------------
                                              Keith S. Haffner
                                              President and Chief Executive
                                              Officer


     The foregoing  certification  is being furnished solely pursuant to section
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18,  United  States  Code) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.

                                       23


<PAGE>
As of: 8/18/21 9:20 AM 

Received: August 17, 2021 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. ksg-lv3z-1 vq4 

Comments Due: August 19, 2021 

Submission Type: API 

Docket: NIST-2021-0004 

Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework 

Comment On: NIST-2021-0004-0001 

Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework 

Document: NIST-2021-0004-DRAFT-0009 

Comment on FR Doc # 2021-1617 6 

Submitter Information 

Email: 

Organization: WiCyS Trusted AI Affiliate 

General Comment 

The first note for attention: The framework is titled Risk Management Framework, 

Line 202 references it as a Paper, Proposal for Identifying and Managing Bias in Artificial Intelligence. 

At best the Framework should be a Framework for Risk and can have placeholders for other risks and list 

Bias in more depth under the Bias Risk. 

The second note for attention: There is no risk assessment methodology, even at a outline level for 

determining impact of the AI System development. 

Pamela Gupta

President OutSecure 

President WiCyS Trusted AI Affiliate
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of US Dataworks, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based
on such evaluation;c)
    
    disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ John T. McLaughlinJohn T. McLaughlin,Chief Accounting Officer
Exhibit 12.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Jean-Claude Zhang, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of BCD Semiconductor Manufacturing Limited (the Company);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Companys other certifying officer and
I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 25, 2011



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ Jean-Claude Zhang                  
|Jean-Claude Zhang                      
|Chief Financial Officer                
|BCD Semiconductor Manufacturing Limited
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE


OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


REGARDING FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING


TO FORM 10-Q FOR FISCAL QUARTER ENDED NOVEMBER 1, 2002





I, Joseph M. Harris, President and Chief Executive Officer, state and attest that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review
of HLM Design, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Fiscal Quarter ended November 1, 2002 (the Report):





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of HLM Design, Inc.





/s/ Joseph M. Harris





Joseph M. Harris


President and Chief Executive Officer


HLM Design, Inc.





Date: December 16, 2002





I, Vernon B. Brannon, Senior Vice President, Chief Operating Office and Chief Financial Officer,
state and attest that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of HLM Design, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Fiscal Quarter ended November 1, 2002 (the Report):





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of HLM Design, Inc.





/s/ Vernon B. Brannon





Vernon B. Brannon


Chief Financial Officer


HLM Design, Inc.





Date: December 16, 2002