alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

              FIRST AMENDMENT TO MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS AGREEMENT

     This First Amendment (this "Amendment") is entered into as of January 
23, 1998 by and between Unique Investment Corp., a California corporation 
("Unique"), and Hawker Pacific Aerospace (the "Company"), in order to amend 
that certain Mergers and Acquisitions Agreement, dated September 2, 1997 (the 
"Agreement"), between Unique and the Company as herein set forth:

     1.   The first sentence of the second paragraph of the Agreement is 
hereby amended to add the following at the end of the sentence:

     "(the "Acquisition Closing Date"), which amount shall be reduced by the 
aggregate amount of payments made to Unique by the Company beginning January 
1, 1998 through the Acquisition Closing Date, pursuant to that certain 
Management Agreement dated as of March 1, 1997 by and between Unique and the 
Company and any successor agreement thereto."

     No changes are being made to the remainder of the paragraph or to the 
rest of the Agreement.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Unique and the Company have entered into this 
Amendment effective as of the date set forth above.

                                             UNIQUE INVESTMENT CORP.


                                             By: /s/ Scott W. Hartman
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Scott Hartman
                                                Chief Operating Officer


                                             HAWKER PACIFIC AEROSPACE


                                             By:/s/ David Lokken
                                                ------------------------------
                                                David Lokken
                                                Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2

Certifications

I, James A. Cardwell, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Petro, Inc.;

2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrants other certifying
officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2006



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ James A. Cardwell, Jr.           
|(James A. Cardwell, Jr.)             
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 595

Concerning the need to improve working conditions at the Han Young truck

factory in Tijuana, Mexico.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 13, 1998

Ms. LOFGREN (for herself, Mr. GEPHARDT, Mr. BONIOR, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr.

DELAHUNT, Mr. SANDERS, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts,

Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. STARK, Mr. FILNER, and Mr. BROWN of Ohio)

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Concerning the need to improve working conditions at the

Han Young truck factory in Tijuana, Mexico.

Whereas the United States has a moral obligation to ensure

that its trading partners respect the basic democratic

rights of their workers;

Whereas workers at the Han Young truck factory in Tijuana,

Mexico, have reported deplorable working conditions, and

Mexican safety inspectors have confirmed substantial

health and safety violations;

Whereas, in April 1997, workers at the Han Young factory

began to organize a union;
2

•HRES 595 IH

Whereas workers who pursued union activities in the factory

suffered reprisals for their organizing efforts, including

threats, shift changes, harassment, and dismissals;

Whereas workers at the Han Young factory voted more than

once to be represented by an independent union and went

on strike on May 22, 1998, because the Han Young company refused to bargain with the union;

Whereas the United States National Administrative Office

(NAO) in the Department of Labor conducted a two-part

review of the conditions at the Han Young factory pursuant to its obligations under the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation;

Whereas the NAO found that Mexico’s constitution and federal laws protect workers’ freedom to organize and join

unions of their choice, and found that the placement of

obstacles to this freedom by local Conciliation and Arbitration Boards is not consistent with Mexico’s obligations

under article 3 of the North American Agreement on

Labor Cooperation;

Whereas the NAO found that the reports of the workers and

safety inspectors are consistent and credible in describing

a workplace polluted with toxic airborne contaminants,

operating with unsafe machinery, strewn with electrical

cables running through puddles of water, and exhibiting

numerous other violations of minimum health and safety

standards;

Whereas the NAO has been unable to ascertain whether fines

against Han Young were imposed or collected in accordance with Mexican law; and

Whereas the NAO has recommended that the Secretary of

Labor consult with Mexico’s Secretary of Labor and So-
3

•HRES 595 IH

cial Welfare to address these issues: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) urges the Mexican government to do every3 thing in its power to ensure that the rights of the

4 Han Young workers are respected; and

5 (2) urges the President to pursue ministerial

6 and diplomatic consultations with the Mexican gov7 ernment in order to resolve the situation at the Han

8 Young truck factory in Tijuana, Mexico.

Æ
Community Resilience Workshop: 

Data Needs for Resilience Planning and Decision-Making

NIST and the Center for Risk-Based Community Resilience Planning 

Draft Agenda

Hilton Washington DC/Rockville Hotel & Executive Meeting Ctr.

1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852

www.HiltonRockville.com

October 25-26, 2018

Thursday October 25, 2018

8:00-8:30 Registration

8:30-9:10 Welcome & Introduction

9:10-9:30 Keynote Speaker

Sandi Fowler, Assistant City Manager, City of Cedar Rapids, IA

Cedar Rapids: Data and Tools Used in Planning and Carrying Out a Successful 

Resilience Strategy

9:30-10:15 Session 1: How Communities Characterize Themselves, Set Goals, & Make 

Decisions 

Arrietta Chakos, Urban Resilience Strategies, Berkeley, CA

Sean McGlynn, City Manager, Santa Rosa, CA,

Janet Zeis, Community Resilience Coordinator, Chester County, PA 

Discussion of the data, information, and tools needed by communities to characterize 

themselves, set long-term goals, and make decisions. 

10:15-10:30 Break

10:30-12:00 Breakout Session 1

Concurrent facilitated sessions

12:00-1:30 Lunch on your own

1:30-2:15 Highest Priority Data and Tools for Session 1

2:15-3:00 Session 2: The Gap Between Current and Desired Performance of the Community’s 

Built Environment

Ed Fratto, Northeast States Emergency Consortium, Wakefield, MA

Jay Wilson, Emergency Manager, Clackamas County, OR 

Discussion of data, information, and tools needed by communities to determine 

performance gaps of the built environment.

3:00-3:15 Break
Community Resilience Workshop: 

Data Needs for Resilience Planning and Decision-Making

3:15-4:30 Breakout Session 2

Concurrent facilitated sessions

4:30-5:15 Highest Priority Data and Tools for Session 2

5:15-5:30 Day One Wrap-Up

Friday October 26, 2018

8:30-8:45 Opening and Framing Remarks

8:45-9:45 Session 3: Community Resilience Priorities and Solutions

Jane Cage, InsightFive, Citizens Advisory Recovery Team, Joplin, MO 

Scott Davis, SGD Urban Solutions, Washington, DC

Josh Ghaffari, Comprehensive Plan Manager, Washington, DC 

Gerry Horak, Mayor Pro Tem, Fort Collins, CO

Discussion of the data, information, and tools used by communities to prioritize their 

performance gaps and select solutions to close those gaps. 

9:45-11:30 Breakout Session 3

Concurrent facilitated sessions

11:30-11:45 Break

11:45-12:30 Highest Priority Data and Tools for Session 3

12:30-1:15 Final Review of Priorities and Discussion

1:15-1:30 Wrap-Up and Closing Remarks
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 547 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 547

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the President 
should reimburse the Federal Government for the estimated $4,400,000 in 
 costs incurred by the Office of Independent Counsel in investigating 
               his relationship with Ms. Monica Lewinsky.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 1998

 Mr. LaHood submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the President 
should reimburse the Federal Government for the estimated $4,400,000 in 
 costs incurred by the Office of Independent Counsel in investigating 
               his relationship with Ms. Monica Lewinsky.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the President should reimburse the Federal Government for the estimated 
$4,400,000 in costs incurred by the Office of Independent Counsel in 
investigating his relationship with Ms. Monica Lewinsky.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 13.2



Certification



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of LG.Philips LCD Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the
Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of the Company.



Dated: April 11, 2005



/s/ Ron H. WirahadiraksaRon H. WirahadiraksaChief Financial Officer andJoint Representative Director




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to LG.Philips LCD Co., Ltd. and will be retained by LG.Philips LCD Co., Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
H. Res. 574

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 6, 1998.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 4194) making appropriations for the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and for sundry independent agencies, boards, commissions, corporations, and offices for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1999, and for other purposes. All points of order

against the conference report and against its consideration

are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of SmartPros Ltd. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Allen S. Greene, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.



/s/ ALLEN S. GREENE
-----------------------------
Allen S. Greene
Chief Executive Officer

March 22, 2007
Subject: EXT :FW: Potential improvements in CSF 2.0 

Date: Thursday, March 9, 2023 1:40:56 PM 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening 

attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. 

FYI 

To: cyberframework <cyberframework@nist.gov> 

Subject: Potential improvements in CSF 2.0 

Dear colleagues, thank you for the opportunity to share my suggestion for improvement CSF 

1.1. This framework is shown its usability in the improvement of cybersecurity posture in 

various kinds of organisations worldwide. 

1. Risk framing. NIST SP 800-30 proposed a brilliant idea to frame risks by focusing on the most 

important in the specific organisational context and later make all assessments, mitigation 

measures and monitoring only for them and prevent the spread the resources and efforts. I 

think it would be nice if CSF 2.0 would refer to risk framing in the section "Establishing or 

Improving a Cybersecurity Program" (page 21 in CSF 1.1). 

2. Risk Tiering. The CSF 1.1 is not clear enough for managing risks on all three tiers, as noted in 

NIST SP 800-30, and seems to focus primarily on Tier 3 (information systems) risks. I guess 

that due to current significant geopolitical changes (like the COVID-19 pandemic, the Russia 

war in Ukraine, the potential war in the Taiwan Strait, etc.), the overfocusing on the Tier 3 

risks and diminishing the attention to Tier 1 risks may seriously decrease the cybersecurity 

posture. 

3. Shared responsibility. Due to the widespread adoption of public and hybrid clouds, the idea 

of shared responsibility between cloud customer and cloud provider has become common 

(see, for example, https://aws.amazon.com/compliance/shared-responsibility-model/ 

[gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]). and https://learn.microsoft.com/enus/azure/security/fundamentals/shared-responsibility 

[gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]). It would be nice if CSF 2.0 referred to it and 

explicitly noted the need to implement security controls in the appropriate part of the big 

picture, keeping the customer fully responsible for meeting the chosen target security profile. 

4. Certification. It seems to be nice if CSF 2.0 proposed a clear way to certify the specific 

organisation to meet the chosen security profile and to certify particular individuals who have 

the skills and experience to build and manage cybersecurity management systems according 

to NIST CSF. 

Hope my suggestions will help to make this world a bit better. 

Best regards, 
 

 Vsevolod (Sam) Shabad
EXHIBIT 99.1

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON

Officers Certificate

---

March 4, 2011

MERRILL LYNCH DEPOSITOR, INC.One Bryant Park

  3rd Floor  Structured Credit Trading

  New York, NY
10036

PREFERREDPLUS, PPLUS
TRUST AND INDEXPLUS CERTIFICATE

The undersigned, Maryann Joseph,
Vice President of The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of New York), a New York corporation (the Trustee), hereby
certifies in such capacity that, based on her knowledge, the Trustee has complied, in all
material respects, with all conditions and covenants applicable to the Trustee under the
Standard Terms for Trust Agreements dated February 20, 1998 between Merrill Lynch
Depositor, Inc. as depositor (the Depositor) and the Trustee, as successor to United
States Trust Company of New York, as trustee and securities intermediary (the Securities
Intermediary), in each case as amended by a series supplement between the Depositor, the
Trustee and the Securities Intermediary for each trust series listed in the attached
schedule.

| | Very truly yours,                                                                                               
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                                 
| | The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly

        The Bank of New York), as Trustee                                
| |                                                                                                                 
| | By: /s/ Maryann Joseph                                                                                          
| | Name: Maryann Joseph
                                                               
      Title: Vice President

| |  | 
| |  | 

---

SCHEDULE

INDEXPLUS Trust Series 2003-1 
  PPLUS
Trust Series CMT-1 
  PPLUS Trust Series CSF-1 
  PPLUS Trust Series
DCNA-1 
  PPLUS Trust Series FMC-1 
  PPLUS Trust Series GSC-1 
  PPLUS Trust Series GSC-2 
  PPLUS Trust Series GSG-1 
  PPLUS Trust Series GSG-2 
  PPLUS Trust Series
JPM-1 
  PPLUS Trust Series LMG-3 
  PPLUS Trust Series SPR-1 
  PPLUS
Trust Series TWC-1 
  PPLUS Trust Series VAL-1 
  PreferredPLUS Trust Series ALL-1

  PreferredPLUS Trust Series CCR-1 
  PreferredPLUS Trust Series CTR-1

  PreferredPLUS Trust Series CZN-1 
  PreferredPLUS Trust Series ELP-1 
  PreferredPLUS Trust
Series FAR-1 
  PreferredPLUS Trust Series FRD-1 
  PreferredPLUS Trust Series GEC-1

  PreferredPLUS Trust Series LMG-1 
  PreferredPLUS Trust
Series LMG-2 
  PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-1 
  PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-2 
  PreferredPLUS Trust
Series UPC-1 
  PreferredPLUS Trust Series VER-1

| |  | 
| |  | 

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Able Home Health, LLC

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03057

Honorable Mary M. Rowland

Home Physicians Group, LLC, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, September 3, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: In light of the notice of

dismissal, Plaintiff voluntarily dismisses its individual claims against Defendant Home

Physicians Group, LLC with prejudice and without costs. Plaintiff voluntarily dismisses

its class claims against Defendant Home Physicians Group, LLC without prejudice and

without costs. Plaintiff voluntarily dismisses its claims against John Does 1−10 without

prejudice and without costs. Any pending schedules in this case are stricken as moot. Civil

case terminated. Mailed notice. (dm, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03057 Document #: 18 Filed: 09/03/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:59
1

Section Text Comments/Suggestions- Reviewer Feedback Reviewer Date

Reference the section of the Quote the section language as it is written in the document. Write the section as it should be after the document is changed. Or leave feedback on the section.

document

Project: NIST-2021-0004-0001 Date: Aug 19, 2021

AI ethical values or ethical principles have been defined by industry and government agencies. Ethical

At the same time, new AI-based technologies, products, and services bring values or ethical principles are an integral part of the public trust. Therefore, they should be listed and

SUPPLEMENTARY technical and societal challenges and risks, including ensuring that AI included as part of the AI RMF.

INFORMATION: comports with ethical values. While there is no objective standard for A few hyperlinks to AI Ethics are listed here:

Genesis for Development of ethical values, as they are grounded in the norms and legal expectations of https://www.intelligence.gov/images/AI/Principles_of_AI_Ethics_for_the_Intelligence_Community.pdf Christine Watson 8/3/2021

the AI Risk specific societies or cultures, it is widely agreed that AI must be designed, https://www.defense.gov/Newsroom/Releases/Release/Article/2091996/dod-adopts-ethicalManagement Framework developed, used, and evaluated in a trustworthy and responsible manner toprinciples-for-artificial-intelligence/

foster public confidence and trust. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/ai/responsible-ai?activetab=pivot1:primaryr6
**EXHIBIT (32.2)****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Annual Report of PeopleSupport, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Caroline Rook, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Actof 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.     /s/ Caroline Rook           Caroline Rook *Chief Financial Officer*March 31, 2005