alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.2






PARTIAL ASSIGNMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT




This Partial Assignment of Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of October 17, 2005 (this
“Assignment”), is by and between The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (“Assignor”) and NAFTA
Rail, S.A. de C.V. (“Assignee”) with reference to the Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of
October 17, 2005 (the “Purchase Agreement”) between Assignor and El-Mo-Mex, Inc. (“Seller”).
Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned thereto in
the Purchase Agreement.



1. Partial Assignment and Assumption.



As contemplated by Section 1 of the Purchase Agreement, Assignor hereby assigns to Assignee all of
Assignor’s rights and obligations under the Purchase Agreement to the extent relating to the
purchase of the Locomotives described in Schedule 1 hereto (the “Assigned Locomotives”), and
Assignee hereby accepts such assignment and agrees to assume all of Assignor’s obligations under
the Purchase Agreement to the extent relating to the purchase of the Assigned Locomotives.



2. No Release of Assignor.



Notwithstanding the assignment and assumption contemplated herein, Assignor agrees for the benefit
of Seller that it shall remain fully liable for the performance of all obligations of Assignor
under the Purchase Agreement, to the extent such obligations are not performed by Assignee.



3 Further Assurances.



Assignor and Assignees agree to execute and deliver such further documents as are reasonably
requested in order to give effect to the assignment and assumption effected by this Assignment,
including such documents as are required to be filed in any jurisdiction in connection with such
assignment and assumption.



4. Choice of Law.



This Assignment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
Illinois .



5. Counterparts.



This Assignment may be executed in any number of counterparts, and such counterparts shall together
constitute a fully executed agreement.



1



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Assignment as of the date first written
above.



THE KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN


RAILWAY COMPANY



By:  /s/ Ronald G. Russ




	 	 	 	Title: Executive Vice President and Chief

Financial Officer





NAFTA RAIL, S.A. de C.V.



By:  /s/ Jay M. Naldman


Title: Authorized Representative




2
Proposed Technical Ap

2005 Revisions to ITL 

Report from the

DoD Biometric Stand

Working Group

April 26, 2005

www.biometrics.dod.mil
Introduction

DoD Biometric Standards Working Group (

Recommendations for 2005 Revisions of IT

Goals

Meet DoD Functional RequirementsHarmonize Biometric Standards

– ANSI / INCITS M1 Data Interchange Formats (D– Common Biometric Exchange Formats Framew

Support Multiple Biometric TypesNo Modifications to Fielded Equipment
Harmonizing ITL Record and M1 DIF 

 “More” information in M1 DIF than in ITL 

(otherwise we could just translate)

 CBEFF formats carry any type of biomeWorking Group Recommendation Add New ITL Type that carries CBEFF B

Information Record (BIR) in ITL File
Example ITL 1-2000 File(Image-based)

Transaction Information 

(Type 1)

Other Records

(Type X)

Image Rec

(Type 14

LOGICAL RECORD LENGTH (LEN) 1.001: <length> 

G

S

LOGICAL RECORD LENGTH (LEN) 14.001: <length> 

G

IMAGE DESIGNATION CHARACTER (IDC) 14.002:01 

G

S

...FINGER POSITION (FGP) 14.013:1 

G

S

IMAGE DATA (DAT) 14.999: <40KB OF 

ASCII Characters 
Example M1 DIF (Image-based

CBEFF Patron 

M1 Data Interchan

Ima

Field Size Valid values NotesFormatidentifier

4 bytes 0x46495200 (‘F’ ‘I’ ‘R’

0x0)

“FIR” – Finger ImageRecord

Versionnumber

4 bytes 0x30313000 (‘0’ ’1’ ’0’

0x0)

“010”

Recordlength

6 Bytes 36+ Number Views *

(14 bytes + Data length )

Includes all finger views

... ... ... ...

INCITS 381-2004
Add a New Type for CBEFF BIR

Type-99

M1 Data Inter

CBEFF Pa

ASCII Characters

LOGICAL RECORD LENGTH (LEN) 99.001: <length> 

G

S

IMAGE DESIGNATION CHARACTER (IDC) 99.002: <n>

G

S

CBEFF_BIR_PATRON_FORMAT_OWNER 99.003: <4 ASCII charCBEFF_BIR_PATRON_FORMAT_TYPE 99.004: <4 ASCII charCBEFF BIR 99.999: <BINARY DA
Advantages

Supports all CBEFF-registered Patron FoSupports all registered Format Types in 

(M1 DIF and others)

Data may have been captured in an M1 

CBEFF Patron Format – does not need reformatted
Example ITL 1-2000 File

Transaction

Information 

(Type 1)

CBEFF Record

(Type 99) 

CBEFF Reco

(Type 99)

CBEFF 

M1 Data In

Nested CBEFF Patron Format

“another” Interchange Format

Ear

M1 Data Interchange Format

Iris
Formal Recommendations

1. Support multiple biometric types by adding a n

for exchanging biometric data through BiometRecords (BIR) that conform to the Common BFile Format (CBEFF) NISTIR 6529-A.

2. Support backward compatibility by not allowin

existing record types.

3. Add text to require that, for an implementation 

specification, any unrecognized or unused datmust be ignored and must not cause a transacThis requirement should apply to both unrecogfields as well as unrecognized/unused types.

4. Include an informative annex to provide exam

implementation of the DoD Biometric SWG prData Record.
Contact Information

Dale HapemanSupport ContractorDepartment of Defense Biometrics Fusion Center 304-326-3029dale.hapeman@dodbfc.army.mil

www.biometrics.dod.mil
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Illinois State Rifle Association, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04270

Honorable Mary M. Rowland

Brendan F. Kelly, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, May 20, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Hearing on Plaintiffs'

motion for preliminary injunction hearing held. Counsel appeared via video conference.

The court will rule on the pending motions by mail. Mailed notice. (dm, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04270 Document #: 82 Filed: 05/20/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:484
[784 NYS2d 278]

#### Pomeroy Company, Appellant, v Mattie Thompson, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

October 1, 2004

*52APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Rose & Rose,*New York City *(.Kenneth E. Rosen*of counsel), for appellant. *Legal Aid Society,*New York City *(David W. Weschler*and *Jaya K. Madhavan*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order entered on or about August 9, 2002 affirmed, without costs.

The Civil Court may, in appropriate circumstances, vacate a warrant of eviction and restore a tenant to possession even after execution of the warrant of eviction *(see Matter of Brusco v Braun,*84 NY2d 674, 682 [1994]; *102-116 Eighth Ave. Assoc. v Oyola,*299 AD2d 296 [2002]). Based upon the extensive hearing evidence presented below, and considering, among other factors, the age and disability of the tenant and the (nearly 50-year) duration of the rent-controlled tenancy, the demonstrated lapses and inactivity of both the Department of Social Services and the tenant’s initial court-appointed guardian found to have contributed to the tenant’s eviction, the tenant’s eventual securing of funds from public assistance to make the landlord whole, and the transient nature of the new tenant’s occupancy, “a careful balancing of the equities” *(B&A Realty Co. v Castro,*NYLJ, May 9, 1995, at 25, cols 1, 2 [App Term, 1st Dept]) warranted the court’s exercise of its discretionary authority in tenant’s favor. Nor was the tenant’s two-month delay in seeking restoration fatal to her cause in the unusual circumstances of this case, and taking into account the tenant’s immediate hospitalization and subsequent convalescence following the eviction process.

McCooe, J.B, Davis and Gangel-Jacob, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
 
MPEL HOLDINGS CORP. (FORMERLY COMPUTER TRANSCEIVER SYSTEMS, INC.) AND SUBSIDIARY

                           FORM 10 - QSB (Exhibit 1)

                                CAPITALIZATION



The following table sets forth the debt and capitalization of the Company as of
December 31, 1997 pro forma giving effect to the merger. This table should be
read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements, including the
Notes thereto, included in the Pre-effective Amendment No.4 to Form SB-2.

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                                          December 31, 1997
                                                                         Actual           Pro Forma
                                                                     ----------------  ----------------
<S>                                                                <C>                 <C> 
Debt:

      Warehouse lines of credit                                    $      10,532,994 $      10,532,994
      Subordinated debt                                                      878,000           878,000
      Notes payable                                                          903,875           903,875
      Obligation under capital lease                                         193,184           193,184
                                                                     ----------------  ----------------
Total Debt                                                         $      12,508,053 $      12,508,053



Stockholders' Equity:

      Common Stock, $.01 par value, 15,000,000 shares
      authorized, 8,056,000 shares outstanding actual,
      8,394,142 shares outstanding pro forma                                   8,056             8,394
      Additional paid-in capital                                           1,002,004         1,004,718
      Accumulated deficit                                                    -76,702           -76,702
                                                                     ----------------  ----------------
Total stockholders' equity                                                   933,358           936,410
                                                                     ================  ================
                Total capitalization                               $      13,441,411 $      13,444,463
                                                                     ================  ================
</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1
                                  ------------

                       COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                     ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                   CWMBS, INC.
                     CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2004-9
                MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-9


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP (a
"Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16 of
the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

         (i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
         preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer
         under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

         (ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master
         Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
         throughout such year.




/s/ Joseph M. Candelario                    Dated: March 30, 2005
------------------------

JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Mark Wong                               Dated: March 30, 2005
-------------

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
Promoting 

usability 

concepts and 

techniques 

worldwide

upa

usability professionals’ association

Starting from PeopWhitney QuesenberyUsability Professionals' AssociaDirector, Voting and Usability PWhitney Interactive Design, LLC
upa

UPA Voting and Usability P

 Project founded in late 2000 Focus on the user experience of an elect

knowledge and skills usability professionimproving the elections process

 Interested in guidelines for usability testin Cooperation with other efforts, such as th

Democracy , AIGA and ACM SIGCHI

 International e-list provides a discussion 

researchers in usability in e-voting and e

http://www.usabilityprofessionals.org/upa_projects
upa

Is usability important?

How hard is it to put 

an “x” next to your 

candidate’s name? 

Most people manage 

it just fine!

Usab

thin

worr

ca

tech

e
upa

A different view

Usability and the entire user experietechnology, should be the starting pdesign of any voting system. Only through a user-centered desigcan we design voting systems that needs of all the people who use it:

votersofficialscandidatessociety as a whole
upa

A user-centered approach

ISO 13407 - Human-cent
upa

What is usability?

Usability:The extent to which a product caby specified users to achieve spewith effectiveness, efficiency and in a specified context of use. 
upa

Usability testing

Project 

Initiation

Design and 

Development

FormativeUnderstandhow the current system works. Investigateusers and the context of use

DiagnosticEvaluate the product (both design and implementation) throughout the development process

SEfarmsu
upa

Quality and usability are dif

 Quality looks for

 Correctly spelled names Approved position on the 

ballot

 Relative font size

 Usability lo

 Unam

proce

 Read Succe
upa

It’s important to watch vote

photos from Susan King Roth “Disenfranchised by Design” in IDJ, 1998
upa

Good design supports usab

From Design for De
upa

Usability testing after releas

Project 

Initiation

Design and 

Development

Product 

Release

Dorothy Tirpo

When should a ballot be usability tested because the election requirements change the context of use?
upa

"I was trying to make the prso elderly people in Palm BCounty can read it. We sent sample ballots to all registeand no one said a word."

Th

Superviso

Palm B

No
upa

Usability Professionals’ Ass

The UPA supports those who promote and advance usable products, reaching out to people who act as and the user experience. Members come from acrodisciplines that create the user experience. 

The goals of the UPA are to:

• Provide an international network through which us

share information about the techniques and methodo

• Create an inclusive community for those intereste

their primary focus or related to another discipline. 

• Change new product development processes to 

people who use them by presenting the business cadevelopment to colleagues, customers, the public an

• Increase the body of knowledge about usability an

through professional education, meetings and conveprofessional interchanges 

Promoting usability concepts and techniques worldwww.usabilityprofessionals.org
EXHIBIT 32.2

                       CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pliant Corporation (the "Company") on
Form  10-Q for the  fiscal  quarter  ended  June  30,  2004,  as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Brian
E. Johnson,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company for
and as of the end of the periods covered by this Report.

/s/ Brian E. Johnson
-------------------------------
Brian E. Johnson
Chief Financial Officer
August 5, 2004

<PAGE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion sh o uld not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________

No. 97-60498

____________

MOZELL VEAL, FELIX VEAL, WALLACE DUNN, AND JOE WOODS, Ed.D.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

LOUIS P WRIGHT, DORIS G BRIDGEMAN, ACIE
WHITLOCK, JR, LYNN EVANS, AND JOSHUA J WIENER,
members of the JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI PUBLIC

SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES, and DAN MERRITT, Ed.D.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

(3:96-CV-654BN)

April 10, 1998

Before GARWOOD, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Moz ell Veal, Felix Veal, Wallace Dunn, and Joe Woods appeal

the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the

defendants on their claims of violation of procedural and

substantive due process rights secured by the U.S. and Mississippi

Constitutions, breach of contract, and pendant state law claims.

After reading the briefs, hearing oral argument, and reviewing therecord in this case, we affirm for essentially the same reasons as

stated in the district court’s opinion.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          52,012
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   86,096
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               167,297
<PP&E>                                       1,041,839
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,482,065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          257,289
<BONDS>                                        692,894
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           871
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,166,735
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,482,065
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               254,543
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  184,640
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     4
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,305
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 59,333
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,317
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,016
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,016
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41
        

</TABLE>
#### Raymond Jerome FRANCIS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Joseph M. BROOKS, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 04-7442.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 2004.

Decided Dec. 23, 2004.

Raymond Jerome Francis, Appellant pro se.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Raymond Jerome Francis, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), and denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Francis v. Brooks,*No. CA-04-341-2 (E.D. Va. filed June 16, 2004 *&*entered June 17, 2004; July 30, 2004); *see also San-Miguel v. Dove,*291 F.3d 257 (4th Cir.2002) (holding that rule announced in *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review regardless of whether action is filed under § 2241 or 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000)).' We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
United States Department of Commerce

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For:

California

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international system of units (SI), documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully 

completed training and proficiency tests, documented calibration intervals, submitted a quality management system, and 

demonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate.

The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State 

Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope

Mass Echelon II

2 kg to 1 mg

Mass Echelon III

30 kg to 1 mg

1000 lb to 0.001 lb

8 oz to 0.01 oz

Volume Gravimetric, I

5 gal to 1 gill

Volume Transfer, II

1000 gal to 1 gal

Volume Transfer, II LPG

100 gal to 25 gal

Length

Steel Tapes, Tape to Tape

100 ft to 1 ft

Temperature, III

65.556 °C to 0 °C

150 °F to 32 °F

Time

Stopwatches

3 h

AC Energy—Watthour Calibration

240 V to 120 V 

Range 250 mA to 50 A 

(0° Phase Angle)

Field Calibrations

Mass Echelon III

50 lb to 25 lb

Volume Transfer, II

500 gal to 5 gal

Volume Transfer, II LPG

100 gal to 25 gal 

(Rev.: September 2021)

2022 to 2023

____________________________________

Katrice Lippa, Chief

NIST Office of Weights and Measures

Effective Dates: 2022-02-01 to 2024-02-01