alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

 

**Certificationof Chairman**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer ofHyperSpace Communications, Inc. (the “*Company*”)hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscalyear ended December 31, 2004 (the “*Report*”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|          | /s/  John Yeros |   |
|---------------|-----------------|--------|
| March 31,2005 | John  Yeros     |
|          | Chairman        |

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.1

Eastern Division

Demetrius Johnson

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04156

Honorable Sara L. Ellis

Reynaldo Guevara, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, August 2, 2024:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis:Motion [305] is resolved as

stated on the record on 2/29/2024 [307]. Mailed notice(rj, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04156 Document #: 360 Filed: 08/02/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:52271
#### QIAO FENG GAN, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-73509.

Agency No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 6, 2004.*

Decided Dec. 16, 2004.

Charles J. Kinnunen, Esq., Hagatna, GU, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, San Francisco, CA, Emily A. Radford, Esq., Keith Bernstein, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before GOODWIN, WALLACE and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Qiao Feng Gan, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her application for asylum and withholding of removal and for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence an adverse credibility determination, *Chebchoub v. INS,*257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001), and we deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibility finding. The BIA offered specific, cogent reasons for its findings based on petitioner’s failure to include pivotal, significant incidents in her asylum application which go to the heart of her asylum claim, including the arrest of her father and brother. *See Alvarez-Santos v. INS,*332 F.3d 1245, 1254 (9th Cir.2003) (upholding an adverse credibility finding based on a pivotal omission from the alien’s asylum application going to the heart of the claim).

*597Because petitioner failed to show that she was eligible for asylum, it follows that she did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003).

In addition, substantial evidence also supports the denial of relief under CAT. *See id.*at 1157.

Pursuant to *Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), petitioner’s motion for stay of removal included a timely request for stay of voluntary departure. Because the stay of removal was continued based on the government’s filing of a notice of non-opposition, the voluntary departure period was also stayed, nunc pro tunc, to the filing of the motion for stay of removal and this stay will expire upon issuance of the mandate.

PETITION DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
SCENARIO: 

The CEO of a boutique hotel realized their business had become the victim of wire fraud when the 

bookkeeper began to receive insufficient fund notifications for regularly recurring bills. A review of the 

accounting records exposed a serious problem. At some point a few weeks before, the CEO had clicked on 

a link in an email that they thought was from the IRS. It wasn’t. When they clicked the link and entered their 

credentials, the cyber criminals captured the CEO’s login information, giving them full access to intimate 

business and personal details.

ATTACK: 

Social engineering, phishing attack.

A phishing attack is a form of social engineering by which cyber criminals attempt to trick individuals by creating and sending fake emails that appear to be 

from an authentic source, such as a business or colleague. The email might ask you to confirm personal account information such as a password or prompt 

you to open a malicious attachment that infects your computer with malware.

RESPONSE: 

The hotel’s cash reserves were depleted. The fraudulent transfers amounted to more than $1 million. The 

hotel also contacted a cybersecurity firm to help them mitigate the risk of a repeat attack. 

IMPACT: 

The business lost $1 million to an account in China. The funds were not recovered. 

LESSONS LEARNED:

1 Teach staff about the dangers of clicking on unsolicited email links and attachments, and 

 the need to stay alert for warning signs of fraudulent emails. Engage in regular email 

 security training.

2 Implement stringent wire transfer protocols and include a secondary form of validation. 

3 Have a cyber incident response plan ready to implement!

DISCUSS:

• Knowing how the firm responded, what would you have done differently? 

• What are some steps you think the firm could have taken to prevent this incident? 

• Is your business susceptible to this kind of attack? How are you going to reduce your risk?

RESOURCES:

• NIST Small Business Cybersecurity Corner: https://www.nist.gov/itl/smallbusinesscyber

• National Cybersecurity Alliance: https://staysafeonline.org/cybersecure-business/

Hotel CEO Finds Unwelcome Guests in Email Account

Case

4

SMALL BUSINESS CYBERSECURITY CASE STUDY SERIES

This resource, funded through NIST Federal Award 70NANB19H165, is intended to be used for general education purposes. The content of the case studies is a combination of publicly available 

information, business-submitted information, and fictional details to create an educational scenario.
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 PlanetOut Inc.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(In thousands, except ratios)
 Year ended December 31,2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2007Income (loss) from
operations as reported
    
    $
    (423
    )
    
    $
    449
    
    
    $
    2,043
    
    
    $
    (1,248
    )
    
    $
    (41,528
    )Add: Fixed charges
    
    
    193
    
    
    
    1,713
    
    
    
    238
    
    
    
    1,216
    
    
    
    2,270Earnings as defined
    
    $
    (230
    )
    
    $
    2,162
    
    
    $
    2,281
    
    
    $
    (32
    )
    
    $
    (39,258
    )Fixed charges
    
    $
    193
    
    
    $
    1,713
    
    
    $
    238
    
    
    $
    1,216
    
    
    $
    2,270Ratio of earnings to
fixed charges (1)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1.3
    x
    
    
    9.6
    x
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
 
 (1)
    
    The ratio of earnings to fixed charges is computed by dividing income
(loss) from operations plus fixed charges by fixed charges. Fixed
charges consist of interest expense, amortization of debt issuance
costs and that portion of rental payments under operating leases that
we believe to be representative of interest. Earnings were
insufficient to cover fixed charges in 2003, 2006 and 2007 by amounts
equal to the net loss for the period.
COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS
TAMMY ROB ERTSON, Appellant,
v.
L I NDA VI STA VI L L AGE APARTMENTS, BROOKH OL L OW HOL DI NGS, L .P., BROOKHO L L OW MANAGEMEN T, L .L .C., OAKWOOD PROP ERTY COMPANY, Appellee s. § § § § § § § § No. 08-09-00072- CV

Appea l from the County Court at L aw No. 6 of El Paso County , Texas (TC# 2006-757)

MEMORAN DUM OP INION Pending be fore the Court is a joint mot ion to dism iss this appea l pursuant to T E X .R.A P P .P. 42.1(a) . The pa rties re prese nt that they

have se ttled all of the cla ims and cause s of action pendingin the underlying la wsuit and have ag ree d to dismi ss the appea l pursuant to their ag ree ment. The motion satisfies the re quirements of Rule 42.1( a). Having considere d the motion, we conc lude it should be GRANTED. We ther efor e dismiss the appe al and a ssess costs ag ainst the party incurringthe same pur suant to the settlement ag ree ment. See T E X .R.A P P .P. 42.1(d).
Dec ember

15, 2010 DAVI D WEL L I NGTON CHEW, C hief Just ice Be fore Chew, C.J ., McClure, a nd Rivera, JJ
.
Case: 1:20-cv-00412 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1
Case: 1:20-cv-00412 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 2 of 10 PageID #:1
Case: 1:20-cv-00412 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 3 of 10 PageID #:1
Case: 1:20-cv-00412 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 4 of 10 PageID #:1
Case: 1:20-cv-00412 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 5 of 10 PageID #:1
Case: 1:20-cv-00412 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 6 of 10 PageID #:1
Case: 1:20-cv-00412 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 7 of 10 PageID #:1
Case: 1:20-cv-00412 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 8 of 10 PageID #:1
Case: 1:20-cv-00412 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 9 of 10 PageID #:1
Case: 1:20-cv-00412 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 10 of 10 PageID #:1
NO. 07-09 -011 8-CV IN THE CO UR T OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL C MA Y13, 2009

_________

_________

_________

___ CERTA IN PRIMARY

UND ERW RIT ERS AT LLOYD’S, LONDON AND C ER TAI N E X C ES S U N D ERW R IT ER S AT LL OY D ’ S LO N D ON , AP PE LL AN TS V. HE RR IN G BA NK , F /K/A H ER RI NG N ATION AL BA NK , AP PELLEE

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE 18 1 ST DIS T RI CT COU RT OF P OT T ER COU NT Y; NO . 91, 926- B; H ON ORABLE JOH N B. B OAR D, JU DG E

_________

_________

_________

____ Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRT LE, JJ.
ME MO RA ND UM OPI NI ON
Pen ding b efore this Cou rt is App ellant s’ Unoppose d Moti on toD is m is s A ppeal

. By the mot ion, Ap pellan ts represe nt tha t the parties ha v e reach ed a settlem entand request that thi s a ppeal be d is mis sed w it h c ost s t o be ass ess ed ag ain st Appel lan ts.2

W it hout pass ing on the meri ts of t he cas e, Appel lan ts’ moti on is g ra nted a n d the appeal i s d is mis sed. See Tex

. R. App. P. 4 2.1. Pursuantto the mot ion , c ost s a re tax ed ag ain st Appel lan ts. Hav ing dis mis sed the appeal at the re q uest of A ppel lan ts, no mot ion for rehear ing w il l be ent ertai ned and our mandate w il l is sue forthw it h. Also pe ndin g in this Court is a m otion for e xten sion of t ime in w hich to f ile the clerk’s re cord. Our

di spos it ion of thi s a ppeal renders t hat mot ion moot.

Pat rick A. Pirtle Justice
#### Fannie Ashman v. Flora Epsteine.

*Trover*— Eatoppelfrom, *claiming ownership*— Question *for jury.*

An action of trover for a watch pawned by the plaintiff’s husband cannot be taken away from the jury on the mere conclusion by the circuit judge that the plaintiff allowed her husband to have possession and appear as owner, and had made no claim for the watch after learning that it was pawned; and was therefore estopped from bringing the action : the evidence of her ownership and of the elements of the alleged estoppel should have been submitted to the jury under hypothetical instructions.

Error to "Wayne. (Jennison, J.)

April 11.

April 18.

Trover. Plaintiff brings error.

Reversed.

*Chas. H. Ford*for appellant.

*Athkinson & Athkinson*for appellee.

Graves, C. J.

This action was brought before a justice for the alleged conversion of a watch, and was carried up by appeal. The circuit judge took the case away from the jury, and ordered a verdict for the defendant.

The watch was pawned by the plaintiff’s husband, and the circuit judge concluded that she allowed him to have possession and appear to others as owner; and further, that she, soon after the watch was pawned, received notice of the *361fact, but forbore to ask the place and make known her claim; and this, it was said, amounted to an estoppel.

Assuming for this purpose that the judge’s theory in regard to an estoppel was entirely accurate, we cannot agree with him that it was proper to take the whole matter from the jury. There was evidence tending to make out the plaintiff’s ownership, and the elements of the supposed estoppel were neither admitted nor conclusively ascertained. There was room for controversy, and the plaintiff was entitled to have the sense of the jury. The regular way to dispose of the question was to submit the evidence under hypothetical instructions.

The judgment must be reversed with costs and a new trial granted.

The other Justices concurred.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 59

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Intelligence in

the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 13, 1997

Mr. GOSS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Oversight

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on

Intelligence in the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Intelligence

4 (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Commit5 tee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses,

8 not more than $4,939,526.00 for the One Hundred Fifth

9 Congress.
2

HRES 59 IH

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

2 Of the amount specified in section 1—

3 (1) not more than $2,420,040.00 shall be avail4 able for expenses incurred during the period begin5 ning at noon on January 3, 1997, and ending imme6 diately before noon on January 3, 1998; and

7 (2) not more than $2,519,486.00 shall be avail8 able for expenses incurred during the period begin9 ning at noon on January 3, 1998, and ending imme10 diately before noon on January 3, 1999.

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner

15 directed by the Committee on House Oversight.

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by

19 the Committee on House Oversight.

Æ
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Mark J. Morabito, Chief Executive Officer of
  Crosshair Exploration & Mining Corp. (the “Company”), hereby
  certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the
        year ended April 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                             

|Date: July 25, 2008 |                           
|------------------- | --------------------------
|                    |                           
|                    | /s/
      Mark J. Morabito
|                    | Mark J. Morabito          
|                    | Chief Executive Officer   

---
Exhibit 32.2

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of MPC Corporation (the “*Company*”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “*Report*”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

|           | /s/ Michael Whyte                            |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------|
| March 31, 2007 | Michael Whyte                                |
|           | Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA     v.   JAFA LEROY MCALLISTER,     Petitioner 

No. 409 MAL 2015   Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 9th day of September, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, John Swallow, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Timberline Resources Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.







Date: January 21, 2006.



/s/ John Swallow

_______________________

John Swallow

(CEO and Chairman of the Board of Directors)

---

---

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6563
BILL BARNES, Petitioner - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; MIKE EASLEY, Superintendent, Respondents - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-711-3) Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 14, 1997 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bill Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Barnes v. North Carolina Attorney General , No. CA-96-711-3 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 1997).We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED