alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 397

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives concerning the President’s use of the White House Counsel’s Office in matters relating

to his personal legal battles.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 25, 1998

Mr. HAYWORTH (for himself, Mr. ARCHER, Mr. ENSIGN, Mr. STUMP, Mr.

JONES, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. LARGENT, Mr. BRYANT, Mr. JENKINS,

Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. HILLEARY, Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania, Mr. SCARBOROUGH, Mr. MCCRERY, Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, Mr. RYUN, Mr. NEUMANN, Mr. DELAY, Mr. COBLE, Mr. ROGERS, Mr. MCINTOSH, Mr.

HUNTER, Mr. COLLINS, Mr. ARMEY, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. EVERETT, Mr.

SMITH of Texas, Mr. LIVINGSTON, Mr. SHADEGG, Mr. TALENT, and Mr.

SMITH of Michigan) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives concerning the President’s use of the White House Counsel’s

Office in matters relating to his personal legal battles.

Whereas the White House Counsel’s office was established to

assist the President in legal analyses of pressing national

official issues;

Whereas President George Bush maintained a staff of no

more than 8 professional lawyers in the Counsel’s office,

even during the time of the Persian Gulf crisis;
2

•HRES 397 IH

Whereas, after being sworn into office in 1993, President

Clinton maintained a staff of 4 attorneys in the White

House Counsel’s office;

Whereas, currently, President Clinton maintains a White

House Counsel’s office staff of 33, at an unprecedented

cost of $2,360,000 in salaries alone, all paid by the taxpayers;

Whereas 15 of the attorneys at the White House Counsel’s

office are ‘‘on loan’’ from other executive branch agencies;

Whereas the White House budget report shows that the

White House overall has as many as 77 total lawyers on

staff and 21 total lawyers on loan;

Whereas salary expenses of the White House Counsel’s office

comprise nearly 10 percent of the total White House salary budget;

Whereas the Chief White House Counsel stated that he

spends at least half of his taxpayer-funded office hours

working on the President’s personal legal issues and such

work clearly is not in any way related to official duties

of the Office of the President;

Whereas the President retains additional attorneys paid for

out of his legal defense fund and these attorneys should

bear the sole responsibility for handling the President’s

personal legal battles; and

Whereas the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has found that

‘‘to allow any part of the Federal Government to use its

in-house attorneys as a shield against the production of

information relevant to a Federal criminal investigation

would represent a gross misuse of public assets’’: Now,

therefore, be it
3

•HRES 397 IH

1 Resolved, That the President should maintain a dis2 tinct line between private legal matters and those legal

3 matters related to the official business of the United

4 States and should immediately discontinue using taxpayer

5 funded attorneys to work on his personal legal matters.

Æ
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Tower Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Michael H. Lee,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Francis M. Colalucci,Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §****906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) ofthe Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| /s/ MICHAEL H. LEE                                            |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael H. Lee                                                |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer                         |   |
| March 8, 2007                                            |   |
| /s/ FRANCIS M. COLALUCCI                                      |   |
| Francis M. Colalucci                                          |   |
| Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and  Treasurer |
| March 8, 2007                                            |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          40,138
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,641
<PP&E>                                         413,566
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,277
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 456,068
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,547
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           248
<OTHER-SE>                                     341,236
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   456,068
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,229
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,303
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 328
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,670
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,670
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,670
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56
        

</TABLE>
H. Res. 588

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 10, 1998.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4761) to require the

United States Trade Representative to take certain actions in

response to the failure of the European Union to comply with

the rulings of the World Trade Organization. The bill shall

be considered as read for amendment. The previous question

shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage

without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on

the bill equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and

Means; and (2) one motion to recommit.

Attest:

Clerk.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32




      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT FOF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Tower Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Michael H. Lee,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Francis M. Colalucci,
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
and 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and


         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





/s/ Michael H. Lee
---------------------
Michael H. Lee
President and Chief Executive Officer

March 21, 2005





/s/ Francis M Colalucci
-------------------------
Francis M. Colalucci
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

March 21, 2005
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/              Jean Dagenais                                     |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Jean                DagenaisChief                Financial Officer |

----
Agenda – 8

th IoT Advisory Board Meeting 

Tuesday, October 24, 2023 

11:00 Chair Opening Remarks

Action Item Review (Sept Meeting

11:15 Outside expert speaker: Dr. Joseph Kvedar, Mass General Brigham

11:45 Outside expert speaker: Jim Kohlenberger, Trusted Future

12:30 Outside expert speaker: Amit Elazari, Open Policy Group 

1:00 Discuss the recommendations received from today’s speakers

Planning next steps for those recommendations 

1:30 Approach/expectations for getting to report delivery

Report writing volunteers 

2:00 Recommendations previously submitted to the IoT AB 

2:45 Storyboard Discussion for the report 

3:30 Draft Report Feedback and walk through of the report 

(including CTIA Letter input) 

5:00 Commentary section

Wednesday, October 25, 2023

11:00 AM Opening of the 2

nd Day of the meeting

11:05 AM Public Participation Speaker: Kenan Frager, Asimily 

11:20 AM Outside Expert Speaker: Kathleen Scott and John Marinho 

Presentation of CTIA comments and discussion of those comments with the IoTAB

12:00 PM Discuss all outstanding recommendations 

Speaker Recommendations from prior meetings 

Recommendations not fully discussed on Tuesday

Other remaining recommendations

1:30 PM Continuation of discussion of draft report 

Draft Report Feedback

CTIA Letter Input Consideration

Commentary section

Report Writing Volunteers

Application of labels and personas 
5:00 PM Close
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL**

**FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of The Flooring Zone, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Carroll, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

| Date: April 17, 2007 | By: /s/ Michael Carroll                      |
|----------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                 | Michael Carroll, Principal Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT 2

(filed under seal)

Case: 1:20-cv-03200 Document #: 79-2 Filed: 05/05/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:579
As the industry continues to develop innovative capture technologies, ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2015 addressed the core 

position and impression labeling framework. Like the ISO fingerprint standards, the previous “impression code” 

has been divided into an impression and a capture technology field. The impression encoding records the method 

that the subject used to interact with the scanner. The technology encoding records the technology used to 

capture the biometric.

The use of the impression and technology encodings are primarily intended to annotate more information about 

the capture. To the extent that a system has more information about a vendor’s technology, the use of this 

information may be able to assist interoperability.

Interactions between systems using Legacy codes and systems relying entirely on these new codes must negotiate 

a solution, and new systems shall be prepared to handle the legacy values if received. For example, a legacy 

system might request an identification of a contact palm image using the legacy code “10.” The new system 

should gracefully handle this value, and an adaptation of the response may be warranted. Vice versa, a new 

capture station might request an identification of a contact palm image with impression code of “0.” Legacy 

systems that treat this impression as a finger image may need an adaptation to properly process the request.

Proposed 2015 Table 8

Contact Impressions

Plain Contact Friction Ridge 0 Now includes all FR types

Rolled Contact Friction Ridge 1 Now includes all FR types

Contact swipe 8 Finger swiped on Platen

Plain Contact Palm 10 Discouraged, Legacy Only

Plain Contact Plantar 30 Discouraged, Legacy Only

Plain Contact (non-livescan) 2, 11, 31 Discouraged, Legacy Only

Rolled Contact (non-livescan) 3 Discouraged, Legacy Only

Plain optical contact 20 Discouraged, Legacy Only

Rolled optical contact 21 Discouraged, Legacy Only

Plain non-optical contact 22 Discouraged, Legacy Only

Rolled non-optical contact 23 Discouraged, Legacy Only

Contactless Acquisitions

Plain contactless, stationary 

subject

24 Intended for user interactions 

where user attempts to remain 

still over a scanner

Rolled contactless, stationary 

subject

25 Intended for user interactions 

where user attempts to remain 

still over a scanner

Plain contactless, moving 

subject

42 Intended for user interactions 

where user performs an 

intentional gesture 

over a scanner

Rolled contactless, moving 

subject

41 Intended for user interactions 

where user performs an 

intentional gesture 

over a scanner

Plain non-optical contactless 26 Discouraged, Legacy Only

Rolled non-optical contactless 27 Discouraged, Legacy Only
System Integration Exceptions

Other 28

Unknown 29

Latent Prints

Latent Image 4 Now Inclusive of all latent

Latent Impression 12, 32, 36 Discouraged, Legacy Only

Latent Tracing 5, 13, 33, 37 Discouraged, Legacy Only

Latent Photo 6, 14, 34, 38 Discouraged, Legacy Only

Latent Lift 7, 15, 35, 39 Discouraged, Legacy Only
H. Res. 420

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 7, 1998.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 3694) to authorize appropriations for fiscal

year 1999 for intelligence and intelligence-related activities of

the United States Government, the Community Management

Account, and the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and

Disability System, and for other purposes. The first reading

of the bill shall be dispensed with. Points of order against

consideration of the bill for failure to comply with clause

2(l)(6) of rule XI are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member

of the Permanent Select Committee on intelligence. After

general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment

under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as

an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-
2

•HRES 420 EH

minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence now printed in the bill, modified by striking section

401 (and redesignating succeeding sections accordingly).

That amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered by title rather than by section. Each title shall be

considered as read. Points of order against that amendment

in the nature of a substitute for failure to comply with clause

7 of rule XVI or clause 5(b) of rule XXI are waived. No

amendment to that amendment in the nature of a substitute

shall be in order unless printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 6 of rule

XXIII. Printed amendments shall be considered as read. The

Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone

until a time during further consideration in the Committee of

the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment;

and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another

electronic vote without intervening business, provided that the

minimum time for electronic voting on the first in any series

of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise

and report the bill to the House with such amendments as

may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate

vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Commit-
3

•HRES 420 EH

tee of the Whole to the bill or the amendment in the nature

of a substitute made in order as original text. The previous

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 579 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                 House Calendar No. 269
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 579

                          [Report No. 105-790]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 4104) making appropriations for the Treasury Department, the 
 United States Postal Service, the Executive Office of the President, 
and certain Independent Agencies, for the fiscal year ending September 
                   30, 1999, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 1998

   Mr. McInnis, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 4104) making appropriations for the Treasury Department, the 
 United States Postal Service, the Executive Office of the President, 
and certain Independent Agencies, for the fiscal year ending September 
                   30, 1999, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
4104) making appropriations for the Treasury Department, the United 
States Postal Service, the Executive Office of the President, and 
certain Independent Agencies, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
1999, and for other purposes. All points of order against the 
conference report and against its consideration are waived. The 
conference report shall be considered as read.
                                     





                                                 House Calendar No. 269

105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 579

                          [Report No. 105-790]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 4104) making appropriations for the Treasury Department, the 
 United States Postal Service, the Executive Office of the President, 
and certain Independent Agencies, for the fiscal year ending September 
                   30, 1999, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 7, 1998

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Central Laborers Pension Fund, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04183

Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama

Abari Construction, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, July 22, 2021:

 MINUTE Entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On 2/1/2021, the

Court stayed this action as to Defendant Abari Construction pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362

[25]. This case is hereby dismissed without prejudice as to Defendant Abari Construction,

with full leave to reinstate once the automatic bankruptcy stay has been lifted in the

bankruptcy court. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (axc).

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04183 Document #: 43 Filed: 07/22/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:145