alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 4

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 7, 1997.

Resolved, That the Clerk be instructed to inform the

President of the United States that the House of Representatives has elected Newt Gingrich, a Representative from the

State of Georgia, Speaker; and Robin H. Carle, a citizen of

the Commonwealth of Virginia, Clerk of the House of Representatives of the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### DARDEN v. SOULES

No. 554P96

Case below: 124 N.C.App. 666

Petition by Soules, Poland, Irby & It’s Prime, in their respective capacities as plaintiffs and defendants, for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 May 1997.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         335,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,262,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   824,000
<INVENTORY>                                 27,920,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            49,694,000
<PP&E>                                      18,667,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,902,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             124,568,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       33,878,000
<BONDS>                                    107,893,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,946,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                124,568,00
<SALES>                                    139,489,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           139,489,000
<CGS>                                      108,101,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              108,101,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            22,986,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,844,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (442,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (24,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (418,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (418,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
10/9/2007 1

SECURITY DISCUSSION 

George A. White Technical Architecture Group 

FBI/CJIS Division 

CJIS/ITMS 

10/9/2007 2

OVERVIEW Directives Potentials Relevance Discussion 

CJIS/ITMS 

10/9/2007 3

Directives OMB Memorandum, Protection Of Sensitive Agency Information, June 23, 2006... 

Allow Remote Access Only With Two-factor Authentication Where One Of The Factors Is Provided By A Device Separate From The Computer Gaining Access. 

Deputy Attorney General Memorandum; Feb. 15, 2007... 

Submit Plan By April 30, 2007 To Bring Remote Access Into Compliance With Department Policies By October 1, 2007.The Plan Must Address: Use Of Two-factor Authentication. 

FBI Response:Layered Authentication Using Two Or More Authenticators To Establish The Identity Of Sender & Receiver Of Information. 

CJIS/ITMS 

10/9/2007 4

Potentials Direct Users are Vetted via CJIS Identity and Authentication process

Factors based on information access requirement and home agency

Federated Users are Asserted via Trust Relationships

Trust relationship parameters based on SLA 

CJIS/ITMS 

10/9/2007 5

Relevance Device Protection 

Authentication to Device Data Encryption

User & Device Authentication Two-Factor Authentication to Agency

Transmission Protection Wireless Encryption

NIST SP 800-48 Risk Mitigation

Security-in-Depth 

CJIS/ITMS 

10/9/2007 6

Open Discussion 

TechnologiesTrends Economics ????? 

CJIS/ITMS 

10/9/2007 7

Questions 

George A. White 304-625-5849 

gwhite3@leo.gov 

CJIS/ITMS 

mailto:gwhite3@leo.gov

10/9/2007 8

BACKUP SLIDE Authentication Factors 

Something You Know:Username/Password, Something You Have: Hard Token, Soft Token, Common Access Card. Something You Are: Fingerprints, RetinalScan, Voice Pattern. Something You Do: Dynamic Biometrics,E.G. Writing Signature, KeystrokeRhythm, Use Patterns. 

CJIS/ITMS
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 329

Providing for the concurrence by the House with an amendment to the

Senate amendment to the House amendments to S. 562.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 13, 1997

Mr. LAZIO of New York submitted the following resolution; which was

considered under suspension of the rules and adopted

RESOLUTION

Providing for the concurrence by the House with an amendment to the Senate amendment to the House amendments to S. 562.

1 Resolved, That, upon the adoption of this resolution,

2 the House shall be considered to have taken from the

3 Speaker’s table the bill S. 562, together with the Senate

4 amendment to the House amendment to the text of the

5 bill, and to have concurred in the Senate amendment with

6 an amendment as follows:

7 In the matter proposed to be inserted by the Senate

8 amendment, at the end of section 304 add the following

9 new subsection:
2

•HRES 329 IH

1 (c) APPLICABILITY.—This section shall apply only

2 during the period beginning on October 1, 1997, and end3 ing at the end of March 31, 1998.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC (the Company) for the
year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Keefe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 26, 2009

/s/ David J. KeefeDavid J. Keefe Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
EXHIBIT 99

<PAGE>



                        INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT
                        -------------------------------



Board of Directors and Stockholders
SFSB Holding Company

We have  reviewed the  accompanying  consolidated  balance sheet of SFSB Holding
Company  and  subsidiary  as of March 31,  2000,  and the  related  consolidated
statements of income and cash flows for the  three-month  period ended March 31,
2000 and 1999, and the consolidated statement of changes in stockholders' equity
for the three-month  period ended March 31, 2000. These  consolidated  financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute  of  Certified  Public  Accountants.  A review  of  interim  financial
informatin consists  principally of applying analytical  procedures to financial
data and making  inquirires of persons  responsible for finanical and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with  generally  accepted  auditing  standards,  the  objective  of which is the
expression of an opinion  regarding the financial  statements  taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material  modifications that should
be made to the  accompanying  financial  statements for them to be in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have  previously  audited,  in accordance  with generally  accepted  auditing
standards,  the  consolidated  balance  sheet as of December 31,  1999,  and the
related consolidated  statements of income,  changes in stockholders' equity and
cash  flows for the year then ended (not  presented  herein);  and in our report
dated  February  11,  2000  we  expressed  an   unqualified   opinion  on  those
consolidated financial statements.



/s/S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

Wexford, PA
May 3, 2000
**Consent
      of Independent Registered** **Public** **Accounting** **Firm**






The
      Board
      of Directors


Macquarie
      Infrastructure Company LLC:




We
      consent to the incorporation
      by reference in the
      registration statement (No. 333-144016) on Form S-8 and
      the
      registration statement (No. 333-138010) on
      Form S-3
      of
      Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC of
      our
      report dated February 27, 2008, with respect to the
      consolidated balance sheets of Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC
      as of
      December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of
      operations, consolidated statements of members’/stockholders’
      equity and comprehensive income
      (loss), and
      consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006,
      and
      2005 and the related
      financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal controls over
      financial reporting as of December 31, 2007.






/s/
                KPMG LLP






Dallas,
      Texas


February
      27, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of SmartPros Ltd. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Stanley P. Wirtheim, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

/s/ Stanley P. Wirtheim
---------------------------
Stanley P. Wirtheim
Chief Financial Officer

March 25, 2005
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Color Kinetics Incorporated (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
George G. Mueller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my best
knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ George G. MuellerGeorge G. MuellerChief Executive Officer Dated: November 15, 2004 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Color Kinetics
Incorporated and will be retained by Color Kinetics Incorporated and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 20
Case 2:16-cr-00088-DGC Document 4 Filed 12/02/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:16-cr-00088-DGC Document 4 Filed 12/02/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:16-cr-00088-DGC Document 4 Filed 12/02/15 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 580 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                       October 8, 1998.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 131) waiving certain 
enrollment requirements for the remainder of the One Hundred Fifth Congress with 
respect to any bill or joint resolution making general or continuing 
appropriations for fiscal year 1999. The joint resolution shall be considered as 
read for amendment. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
joint resolution to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate on the joint resolution equally divided and controlled by the 
Majority Leader and the Minority Leader or their designees; and (2) one motion 
to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### B. Hillerick *v.*W. C. Whitaker.

Attachment — Claim by Third Person — Reference to Master — Commissioner’s Report — Judgment Not in Conformity, to Report.

Where a third person claims the property attached and the question of ownership is referred to the master for proof and report, and the commissioner reported that some of the property attached belonged to a third party, which report was confirmed, it was error to adjudge that all the property attached be sold.

APPEAL FROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY.

September 8, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

When the attachment in this case was levied, appellant was present and, from the evidence of 'Mills and 'others who were also present on that occasion, it appears that he claimed then one spring wagon, there being two on the premises, the engine and boiler, and the beer kegs, the other property he set up no claim to, but admitted it belonged to his son, the obligor in the note sued on.

We do not feel authorized therefore to decide that the chancellor should not have subjected the property to which appellant then set up no claim, to sale for the payment of appellee’s debt.

But before appellant was made a defendant to the action, judgment was rendered, subjecting the engine and boiler and the 95 beer barrels with the other property levied on to sale to satisfy the debt.

After the judgment was rendered on his petition, appellant was made a defendant to the action, and he asserted a claim to all the property attached. The case was then referred to the Master to take proof and to report to whom the property belonged. He reported that the engine, boiler and 95 beer kegs did not belong to the defendant, or rather that the debtor; to appellee owned all the property attached, except the articles named, and the evidence showed conclusively that they belonged to appellant. Notwithstanding the evidence and the report of the Master and the confirmation thereof by the court, still the chancellor ordered and adjudged that the marshal should proceed to sell the at*482tached property in conformity to the former decree previously entered, whereby the engine, boiler and 95 beer kegs were subject to sale, which is evidently erroneous. And for that error the judgment must be *reversed*and the cause remanded with directions to discharge the attachment as to the engine, boiler and 95 beer kegs, and for further proceedings consistent herewith.

*Wood, Drone, for appellants.*

*Whitaker & Gowdy, for appellee.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

POW! ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, )

) Case No. 20-cv-4464

Plaintiff, )

) Judge Harry D. Leinenweber

v. )

)

THE INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, )

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, )

PARTNERSHIPS AND )

UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS )

IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A HERETO,)

)

Defendants. )

SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, a judgment was entered in the above action on November 16, 2020 [Dkt. 

No. 42] in favor of Plaintiff POW! ENTERTAINMENT, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and against the 

Defendants identified in Amended Schedule A. Plaintiff acknowledges payment of an agreed 

upon damages amount, costs and interest and desires to release this judgment and hereby fully 

and completely satisfy the same as to the following Defendants: 

Doe No. Seller Name

57 Ellesse_Online

Therefore, full and complete satisfaction of said judgment as to above-identified 

Defendants is hereby acknowledged and the Clerk of the Court is hereby authorized and 

requested to make an entry of the full and complete satisfaction on the docket accordingly. 

Case: 1:20-cv-04464 Document #: 43 Filed: 11/17/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:3944
2

DATED: November 17, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Michael A. Hierl

Michael A. Hierl (Bar No. 3128021)

William B. Kalbac (Bar No. 6301771)

70 W. Madison Street, Suite#4000

Chicago, Illinois 60602 

Telephone: (312) 580-0100

Facsimile: (312) 580-1994

Email: mhierl@hsplegal.com

Email: wkalbac@hsplegal.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

POW! ENTERTAINMENT, LLC

Case: 1:20-cv-04464 Document #: 43 Filed: 11/17/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:3945
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned attorney hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

Satisfaction of Judgment was filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court and served on all 

counsel of record and interested parties via the CM/ECF system on November 17, 2020.

s/Michael A. Hierl

Case: 1:20-cv-04464 Document #: 43 Filed: 11/17/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:3946
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7153

NATHANIEL K. JOHNSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Joseph C. Howard, Senior

District Judge. (5:06-hc-02049-H)

Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 20, 2006

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel K. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel K. Johnson, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed

in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Johnson v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-hc-02049-H (E.D.N.C.

June 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
9T Horizontal Field Superconducting Magnet 

Sensor A 

Location VTI 

Sensor Type Cernox 

Serial # X22552 

Useful Range (K) 1.4-325 K 

Controller Curve # 23 

Sensor B 

Location Sample Stick A Sample Stick B

Sensor Type Cernox Cernox 

Serial # X22241 X29695 

Useful Range (K) 1.4-325K 1.4-325K 

Controller Curve # 22 26 

Heater 1 (VTI) Resistance (Ω) 46 Ω

Heater 2 (Sample) Resistance (Ω) **17 Ω **120 Ω 

**If you are going to control the temperature using the sample stick heater you must 

change the heater resistance to the appropriate value under control setup on the 

temperature controller.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 24, 2009 

p0217 

Order 

 

February 24, 2009 

137598 

ROBERT QUACKENBUSH, 

AMY QUACKENBUSH, and 

KEN QUACKENBUSH, 

Petitioners-Appellants, 

v SC: 137598 

 COA: 283278 

Arenac CC: 07-010212-AV 

SIMS TOWNSHIP ZONING 

BOARD OF APPEALS, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 31, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 26 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 26

 Requiring the House of Representatives to take any legislative action 
necessary to verify the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment as a 
  part of the Constitution, when the legislatures of an additional 3 
               States ratify the Equal Rights Amendment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 1997

 Mr. Andrews submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Requiring the House of Representatives to take any legislative action 
necessary to verify the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment as a 
  part of the Constitution, when the legislatures of an additional 3 
               States ratify the Equal Rights Amendment.

    Resolved, That, when the legislatures of an additional 3 States 
ratify the Equal Rights Amendment, the House of Representatives shall 
take any legislative action necessary to verify the ratification of the 
Equal Rights Amendment as a part of the Constitution.

                                 <all>
```