alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements and the related prospectuses:



| | (1) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-137006) of Stereotaxis, Inc. pertaining to the registration of up to 1,150,849 shares of its common
stock, $0.001 par value;
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-120135) pertaining to the Stereotaxis, Inc. 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Stereotaxis, Inc.
2002 Stock Incentive Plan, the Stereotaxis, Inc. 2002 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan, and the Stereotaxis, Inc. 1994 Stock Plan;
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-156466) pertaining to the registration of $10,970,100 of common stock, $0.001 par value, warrants or
units;
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-161077) of Stereotaxis, Inc. pertaining to the registration of $75,000,000 of debt securities, common
stock, preferred stock, warrants and units;
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (5) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-161078) of Stereotaxis, Inc. pertaining to the registration of 2,154,526 shares of common stock, $.001
par value; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (6) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-161079) of Stereotaxis, Inc. pertaining to the Stereotaxis, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan and the
Stereotaxis, Inc. 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated March 15, 2010, with respect
to the financial statements and schedule of Stereotaxis, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Stereotaxis, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

St. Louis, Missouri

March 15, 2010
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosures controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Carlos E. AgüeroCarlos E. AgüeroChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Wnorablo 0. C. Randlo 

Drr Sir: 

pinion oi thir 

on raadr in pert 

8 a Daputy Tax 

608, 

aity of xnnir, 

rad uamled ,ln 

tanand, of fan orrfoa 

a thoorand population, 

ding to maintain a DoputT Tax 

or.8 ofT%oa, and ths bal8noa oi 

o be btlilt by tha altq of Bmts. 

ION O?fEt Can the County lagallr axpad 

mnd8 out Of the Permanent xmpro~nt Fun6 r0r 

fhf 8 ptlrpoEs? 

the O;~~?%%?a~uil(I the abora propord building 

Can the Couatf josntly with 

8nd ll80 th8 P6man8tlt II&pPOVmWtt hlld8 iOr SeWlO? 

*I ofta th8 Oa8e Or Denoy VI). DaVid8OZ2, S.W. 

2nd 183-195." 
555 
Elonoreblo C. C. tiandle,'pago 3

556. 

held that a ohm&' OOula not jOin a Oity in puPoha8i;ocl 8 

ERtBiOipd buildin& to be wed by both tho~oounty and 

the ait:;. We believe that thfr opinion togother with 

tha authorities oltod themundrr fully ammar pur 

question and we enclom it together with Opinion Ho. 

O-5978 ior your Ob8eTWitiOn. 

Thi8 a6partmntb* p2'*8Oltt opinioa i8 be8.a on &ho 

root that the proporsa building 18 to b* owned ma,oontrd.U jointly bl the City Of mi8 and ths County Of m118. 

If there were a 8OVOl'~BOO 88 $0 oWn8nl;hip uld OOlttFOl ~a 

aitrerent rulr might re8ult.
#### G. Rexinger *v.*Loeb *&*Bloom.

Attachment — Order Delivered to Sheriff — Priority of Liens.

When an order of attachment is sued out and delivered to the sheriff a lien is thereby created on the property of the defendant, prior and superior to one subsequently issued, although the sheriff levies the last one first.

APPEAL PROM LIVINGSTON CIRCUIT COURT.

April 20, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay :

The order of attachment sued out by Loeb & Bloom bound the stock of groceries in the hands of Littlefield from the time *302of its delivery to the sheriff, and the lien thereby created would have been made perfect and complete had the sheriff executed said order upon said property.

*Bush &*Bush, *for appellant.*

In his original return on the order the sheriff makes no mention of the stock of groceries whatever, and in his amended return he merely states that after the lien of Rexinger had been made complete by the levy of the attachment sued out by him, that his “Intention was to levy the attachment of Loeb & Bloom upon said groceries subject, however, to the attachments of Rexinger, but failed to endorse the' same, which I now endorse.” It is a matter of some doubt from this language whether the intention of the sheriff to make the levy was ever carried out, but if it was, still it is clear he made the same subject to the levy previously made under the attachment of Rexinger. Whether or not the sheriff had the right to require from Loeb & Bloom a bond of 'indemnity it is- unnecessary to decide in the determination of the questions arising upon this appeal.

It is certain that the lien of Rexinger upon the groceries was made complete, before that of Leob & Bloom, (Civil Code, section 263), consequently the proceeds of the sale of the same should have been first applied to the payment of his claim.

For the error of the court in postponing the payment of appellant’s debts until that of appellee was satisfied out of the proceeds of the groceries the judgment appealed from must be reversed.

The cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
H. Res. 3

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 7, 1997.

Resolved, That a committee of two Members be

appointed by the Speaker on the part of the House of

Representatives to join with a committee on the part of the

Senate to notify the President of the United States that a

quorum of each house has assembled and Congress is ready

to receive any communication that he may be pleased to

make.

Attest:

Clerk.
NO. 07-05-0118-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TE XAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL D APRIL 7, 2005

_____________________________ Ex parte ROGER D. PFEIL, Appellant

_________________________________ FROM THE 154 TH DISTRICT COURT OF LAMB COUNTY; NO. 16,508; HON. FELIX KLEIN, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Order of Dismissal

_______________________________ Before QUINN, REAVIS, and CAMPBELL, JJ. Roger D. Pf iel appeals from an order dismissing his application for writ of habeas corpus. The writ was sought to obtain release from the purported restraint of Bruce Peel, mayor of Littlefield, Texas. Pe el had mo ved for di smissal, contendi ng that th e trial c ourt lacke d jurisdiction over the proceedings. The trial court granted the motion. We now dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. One may not appeal from an order denying a writ

of habeas corpus unless the order
arose after a hearing on the merits and the trial court denie d the application on the merits. Ex parte Ha rgett , 819 S.W.2d 866, 868 ( Tex. Cri m. App. 1991). Next, granting a motion to dismiss due to the abse nce of jur isdictio n is not a ruling on the me rits. See Bland Indep.2

Sch. Dist. v. Blue , 34 S.W.3 d 547, 55 4 (Tex. 2 000); see also City of L ubbock v . Rule, 68 S.W.3d 853, 857 (Tex. Ap p.–Amaril lo 2002, no pet.). So because the trial court dismissed the appeal due to the lack of jurisdiction, we ourselves have nojurisdiction over the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Brian Quinn Justice Do not publish.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual Report of EPL Intermediate,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Stein, Vice President and Treasurer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 3. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                            
|----------------------------
|                            
|/s/    Joseph Stein         
|Joseph Stein                
|Vice President and Treasurer
|EPL Intermediate, Inc.      
|March 28, 2005              



This certification is made solely for
the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided EPL Intermediate, Inc. and will be retained by EPL Intermediate, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

CAMELBAK PRODUCTS, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”,

Defendants.

Civil Action No.: 1:20-cv-03947

Judge Thomas M. Durkin

Magistrate Judge Susan E. Cox

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby files this Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal, without prejudice, as to the following Defendant(s) identified on Schedule A of the 

Complaint:

NO. DEFENDANT

1 nenvi01_4

7 jodi161

26 icenturyee

154 cuny1550

155 doflo45tang

166 jingbingl-1

182 taylorroc

187 yuchenx_7

188 zedouaut

Case: 1:20-cv-03947 Document #: 40 Filed: 10/26/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:4325
DATED: October 26, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt (Bar No. 6207971)

Keith Vogt, Ltd.

111 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1700

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Telephone: 312-675-6079

E-mail: keith@vogtip.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case: 1:20-cv-03947 Document #: 40 Filed: 10/26/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:4326
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document was electronically filed on October 26, 2020 with the Clerk of the Court using the 

CM/ECF system, which will automatically send an email notification of such filing to all registered 

attorneys of record.

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt

Case: 1:20-cv-03947 Document #: 40 Filed: 10/26/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:4327
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3858 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 3858

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 6, 2004

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Public Health Service Act to increase the supply of 
    pancreatic islet cells for research, and to provide for better 
     coordination of Federal efforts and information on islet cell 
                            transplantation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pancreatic Islet Cell 
Transplantation Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. ORGAN PROCUREMENT ORGANIZATION CERTIFICATION.

    Section 371 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 273) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Pancreata procured by an organ procurement organization and 
used for islet cell transplantation or research shall be counted for 
purposes of certification or recertification under subsection (b).''.

SEC. 3. ANNUAL ASSESSMENT ON PANCREATIC ISLET CELL TRANSPLANTATION.

    Section 429 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 285c-3) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) In each annual report prepared by the Diabetes Mellitus 
Interagency Coordinating Committee pursuant to subsection (c), the 
Committee shall include an assessment of the Federal activities and 
programs related to pancreatic islet cell transplantation. Such 
assessment shall, at a minimum, address the following:
            ``(1) The adequacy of Federal funding for taking advantage 
        of scientific opportunities relating to pancreatic islet cell 
        transplantation.
            ``(2) Current policies and regulations affecting the supply 
        of pancreata for islet cell transplantation.
            ``(3) The effect of xenotransplantation on advancing 
        pancreatic islet cell transplantation.
            ``(4) The effect of United Network for Organ Sharing 
        policies regarding pancreas retrieval and islet cell 
        transplantation.
            ``(5) The existing mechanisms to collect and coordinate 
        outcomes data from existing islet cell transplantation trials.
            ``(6) Implementation of multiagency clinical investigations 
        of pancreatic islet cell transplantation.
            ``(7) Recommendations for such legislation and 
        administrative actions as the Committee considers appropriate 
        to increase the supply of pancreata available for islet cell 
        transplantation.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 5, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of CompX  International  Inc.  (the
Company)  on Form 10-Q for the  period  ending  June 30,  2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Darryl R.
Halbert, Vice President,  Chief Financial Officer and Controller of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/  Darryl R. Halbert
-----------------------------------------
Darryl R. Halbert
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
 and Controller
August 4, 2003





Note: The certification  the registrant  furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed
"filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  as
amended,  or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  Registration
Statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference,  except as otherwise  expressly
stated in such filing.
H. Res. 379

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 5, 1998.

Resolved, That the bill of the Senate (S. 104) to amend

the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, in the opinion of this

House, contravenes the first clause of the seventh section of

the first article of the Constitution of the United States and

is an infringement of the privileges of this House and that

such bill be respectfully returned to the Senate with a message communicating this resolution.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 31.4
 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
 CERTIFICATIONS FOR QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q/A
 
 I, Hillard C. Gardner, certify that:
 
 1) I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Cavalry Bancorp, Inc.;
 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  
 Date: August 12, 2003
byHillard C. GardnerSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 487 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 487

   Relating to the emancipation of African slaves in the Danish West 
             Indies, now the United States Virgin Islands.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 1998

    Ms. Christian-Green (for herself, Ms. Kilpatrick, Mr. Frank of 
   Massachusetts, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Filner, Mr. Snyder, Mr. Watts of 
Oklahoma, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Frost, 
 and Mr. Dixon) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Relating to the emancipation of African slaves in the Danish West 
             Indies, now the United States Virgin Islands.

Whereas the annual observance of Emancipation Day on July 3 and National 
        Independence Day on July 4 serves to connect Virgin Islanders and all 
        Americans to their past and to reinforce their unwavering commitment to 
        preserve, protect, and defend human rights and freedom: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the emancipation of African slaves in what is now the United States 
Virgin Islands is part of the process of extending civil rights to all 
individuals in what is now the United States.
                                 <all>
```
IV

House Calendar No. 218

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 491

[Report No. 105–603]

Providing for consideration of a concurrent resolution providing for adjournment of the House and Senate for the Independence Day district work

period.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 24, 1998

Mr. DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of a concurrent resolution providing for adjournment of the House and Senate for the

Independence Day district work period.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order, any rule of the House to the contrary

3 notwithstanding, to consider a concurrent resolution pro4 viding for adjournment of the House and Senate for the

5 Independence Day district work period.
House Calendar No. 218

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 491

[Report No. 105–603]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of a concurrent resoluperiod. Senate for the Independence Day district work tion providing for adjournment of the House and

JUNE 24, 1998

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by section 906 has been provided to ESG Re Limitedand will be retained by ESG Re Limited and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of ESG Re Limited (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended March 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alasdair P. Davis, Chief Executive Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

 

(1)                                TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act 1934; and

 

(2)                                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Alasdair  P. Davis   |   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|
| Alasdair P.  Davis       |   |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer |   |   |
| May 30, 2003             |   |   |

 

----