68408 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 221 / Monday, November 17, 2014 / Notices 

Branch (5 CFR part 2635), and Executive 

Order 12674 (as modified by Executive 

Order 12731). Management and support 

services shall be provided by the 

Economics and Statistics 

Administration. 

IV. Compensation 

Membership is under voluntary 

circumstances and therefore members 

do not receive compensation for service 

on the Commerce Data Advisory 

Council. Members shall receive per 

diem and travel expenses as authorized 

by 5 U.S.C. 5703, as amended, for 

persons employed intermittently in the 

Government service. Members who are 

officers or employees of the United 

States Government shall not receive 

compensation for service on the 

Council. 

V. Nominations 

The Secretary will consider 

nominations of all qualified individuals 

to ensure that the CDAC includes the 

areas of subject matter expertise noted 

above (see ’’Structure’’). Individuals 

may nominate themselves or other 

individuals, and professional 

associations and organizations may 

nominate one or more qualified persons 

for membership on the CDAC. 

Nominations shall state that the 

nominee is willing to serve as a member 

of the Council. 

A nomination package should include 

the following information for each 

nominee: (1) A letter of nomination 

stating the name, affiliation, and contact 

information for the nominee, the basis 

for the nomination (i.e., what specific 

attributes recommend him/her for 

service in this capacity), and the 

nominee’s field(s) of expertise; (2) a 

biographical sketch of the nominee and 

a copy of his/her curriculum vitae; and 

(3) the name, return address, email 

address, and daytime telephone number 

at which the nominator can be 

contacted. 

The Department of Commerce has 

special interest in assuring that women, 

minority groups, and the physically 

disabled are adequately represented on 

advisory committees; and therefore, 

extends particular encouragement to 

nominations for appropriately qualified 

female, minority, or disabled 

candidates. The Department of 

Commerce also encourages geographic 

diversity in the composition of the 

Council. All nomination information 

should be provided in a single, 

complete package within 30 days of the 

publication of this notice. Interested 

applicants should send their 

nomination package to the email or 

postal address provided above. 

Potential candidates will be asked to 

provide detailed information concerning 

financial interests, consultancies, 

research grants, and/or contracts that 

might be affected by recommendations 

of the Council to permit evaluation of 

possible sources of conflicts of interest. 

Finally, nominees will be required to 

certify that they are not subject to the 

Foreign Agents Registration Act (22 

U.S.C. 611) or the Lobbying Disclosure 

Act (2 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.). 

Dated: November 3, 2014. 

Austin Durrer, 

Chief of Staff for Under Secretary for 

Economic Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26778 Filed 11–14–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[S–138–2014] 

Foreign-Trade Zone 245—Decatur, 

Illinois; Application for Subzone; 

Schumacher Electric Corporation; 

Hoopeston, Illinois 

An application has been submitted to 

the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the 

Board) by the Economic Development 

Corporation of Decatur and Macon 

County, grantee of FTZ 245, requesting 

subzone status for the facility of 

Schumacher Electric Corporation 

(Schumacher), located in Hoopeston, 

Illinois. The application was submitted 

pursuant to the provisions of the 

Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended 

(19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), and the regulations 

of the Board (15 CFR part 400). It was 

formally docketed on November 12, 

2014. 

The proposed subzone (4.8 acres) is 

located at 1025 E. Thompson Avenue, 

Hoopeston, Vermilion County. No 

authorization for production activity has 

been requested at this time. The 

proposed subzone would be subject to 

the existing activation limit of FTZ 245. 

In accordance with the Board’s 

regulations, Elizabeth Whiteman of the 

FTZ Staff is designated examiner to 

review the application and make 

recommendations to the Executive 

Secretary. 

Public comment is invited from 

interested parties. Submissions shall be 

addressed to the Board’s Executive 

Secretary at the address below. The 

closing period for their receipt is 

December 29, 2014. Rebuttal comments 

in response to material submitted 

during the foregoing period may be 

submitted during the subsequent 15-day 

period to January 12, 2015. 

A copy of the application will be 

available for public inspection at the 

Office of the Executive Secretary, 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 

21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 

1401 Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the 

‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s 

Web site, which is accessible via 

www.trade.gov/ftz. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elizabeth Whiteman at 

Elizabeth.Whiteman@trade.gov or (202) 

482–0473. 

Dated: November 12, 2014. 

Elizabeth Whiteman, 

Acting Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2014–27196 Filed 11–14–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–588–850] 

Certain Large Diameter Carbon and 

Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and 

Pressure Pipe From Japan: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On July 23, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the preliminary 

results of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on certain 

large diameter carbon and alloy 

seamless standard, line, and pressure 

pipe (over 4 1⁄2 inches) from Japan for 

the period of review (POR) of June 1, 

2012 through May 31, 2013. For these 

final results, we continue to find that 

Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. (SMI) 

failed to cooperate to the best of its 

ability and, accordingly, the Department 

is applying AFA to SMI. In addition, we 

find that no shipments were made by 

JFE Steel Corporation (JFE), Nippon 

Steel Corporation (Nippon), and NKK 

Tubes (NKK) during the POR. 

DATES: Effective Date: November 17, 

2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jennifer Meek, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 1, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–2778. 

Background 

On July 23, 2014, the Department 

published the preliminary results of the 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 221 / Monday, November 17, 2014 / Notices 68409 

1See Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy 

Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (Over 

41⁄2 Inches) from Japan: Preliminary Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012– 

2013, 79 FR 42762 (July 23, 2014) (Preliminary 

Results) and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

2See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 5–10. 

3 Id. at 7–10. 

4See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain 

Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless 

Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe from Japan; and 

Certain Small Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless 

Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe From Japan and 

the Republic of South Africa, 65 FR 39360 (June 26, 

2000) (LTFV Investigation). 

5See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

6See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

7See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain large 

diameter carbon and alloy seamless 

standard, line, and pressure pipe from 

Japan.1 We invited interested parties to 

comment on the Preliminary Results. 

We received no comments. The 

Department has conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the order are 

large diameter seamless carbon and 

alloy (other than stainless) steel 

standard, line, and pressure pipes 

produced, or equivalent, to the 

American Society for Testing and 

Materials (ASTM) A–53, ASTM A–106, 

ASTM A–333, ASTM A- 334, ASTM A– 

589, ASTM A–795, and the American 

Petroleum Institute (API) 5L 

specifications and meeting the physical 

parameters described below, regardless 

of application. The scope of the order 

also includes all other products used in 

standard, line, or pressure pipe 

applications and meeting the physical 

parameters described below, regardless 

of specification, with the exception of 

the exclusions discussed below. 

Specifically included within the scope 

of the order are seamless pipes greater 

than 4.5 inches (114.3 mm) up to and 

including 16 inches (406.4 mm) in 

outside diameter, regardless of wallthickness, manufacturing process (hot 

finished or cold-drawn), end finish 

(plain end, beveled end, upset end, 

threaded, or threaded and coupled), or 

surface finish. 

The seamless pipes subject to the 

order are currently classifiable under 

the subheadings 7304.10.10.30, 

7304.10.10.45, 7304.10.10.60, 

7304.10.50.50, 7304.19.10.30, 

7304.19.10.45, 7304.19.10.60, 

7304.19.50.50, 7304.31.60.10, 

7304.31.60.50, 7304.39.00.04, 

7304.39.00.06, 7304.39.00.08, 

7304.39.00.36, 7304.39.00.40, 

7304.39.00.44, 7304.39.00.48, 

7304.39.00.52, 7304.39.00.56, 

7304.39.00.62, 7304.39.00.68, 

7304.39.00.72, 7304.51.50.15, 

7304.51.50.45, 7304.51.50.60, 

7304.59.20.30, 7304.59.20.55, 

7304.59.20.60, 7304.59.20.70, 

7304.59.60.00, 7304.59.80.30, 

7304.59.80.35, 7304.59.80.40, 

7304.59.80.45, 7304.59.80.50, 

7304.59.80.55, 7304.59.80.60, 

7304.59.80.65, and 7304.59.80.70 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). Although the 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, our 

written description of the merchandise 

subject to the scope is dispositive. A full 

description of the scope of the order is 

contained in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

The Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). 

IA ACCESS is available to registered 

users at http://iaaccess.trade.gov and is 

available to all parties in the Central 

Records Unit, room 7046 of the main 

Department of Commerce building. In 

addition, a complete version of the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum can 

be accessed directly at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. 

Final Determination of No Shipments 

We have made no changes to our 

findings announced in the Preliminary 

Results. Consistent with our findings in 

the Preliminary Results,2 we find that 

JFE, Nippon, and NKK had no 

shipments during the POR. 

Methodology 

Also consistent with the Preliminary 

Results,3 and in accordance with 

sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, we 

relied on facts available with an adverse 

inference with respect to SMI. Thus, we 

assign a rate of 107.80 percent as the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

SMI with respect to one of its entries, 

while we continue to find that SMI had 

no other shipments during the POR. For 

a full description of the methodology 

underlying our conclusions, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Final Results of Review 

We determine that, for the period June 

1, 2012, through May 31, 2013, the 

following dumping margin exists for a 

certain entry for SMI: 

Company Rate 

(percent) 

Sumitomo Metal Industries, 

Ltd. .................................... 107.80 

Cash-Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

are effective for all shipments of the 

subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

of the final results of this administrative 

review, as provided in section 751(a)(1) 

of the Act: (1) Cash-deposit rate for SMI 

will be that established in the final 

results of this review; (2) for previously 

reviewed or investigated companies not 

covered in this review, the cash-deposit 

rate will continue to be the rate 

published for the most recent period; (3) 

if the exporter is not a firm covered in 

this review, a prior review, or the lessthan fair-value (LTFV) investigation but 

the manufacturer is, the cash-deposit 

rate will be the rate established for the 

most recent period for the manufacturer 

of the subject merchandise; (4) if neither 

the exporter nor the manufacturer is a 

firm covered in this or any previous 

segment of the proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the allothers rate established in the LTFV 

investigation, which is 68.88 percent.4

These cash-deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Assessment Rates 

The Department shall determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties 

on all appropriate entries, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.212. The Department 

intends to issue assessment instructions 

to CBP 15 days after the date of 

publication of these final results of this 

review. 

These final results of this review are 

the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by this review and 

for future deposits of estimated duties, 

where applicable.5 Where assessments 

are based upon total facts available, 

including total AFA, we instruct CBP to 

assess duties at the AFA margin rate. 

The Department intends to instruct CBP 

to assess antidumping duties on the 

single POR entry of the subject 

merchandise produced or exported by 

SMI at the rate of 107.80 percent of the 

entered value.6

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003.7 This clarification will 

apply to all POR entries entered under 

the case numbers for JFE, Nippon, and 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
68410 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 221 / Monday, November 17, 2014 / Notices 

8See LTFV Investigation. 

1See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant 

to Fourth Remand, Court No. 09–00378, dated 

October 16, 2014, available at: http://

enforcement.trade.gov/remands/index.html (‘‘WBF 

Final Remand’’). 

2See Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and New Shipper Reviews: 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People’s 

Republic of China, 74 FR 41374 (August 17, 2009), 

as amended by Amended Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and New 

Shipper Reviews: Wooden Bedroom Furniture From 

the People’s Republic of China, 74 FR 55810 

(October 29, 2009) (collectively, ‘‘AR 3 Final 

Results’’). 

NKK, and certain entries entered under 

the case number for SMI for which we 

determined SMI demonstrated its 

certification of no POR shipments. We 

will instruct CBP to liquidate these 

entries at the all-others rate established 

in the LTFV investigation, 68.88 

percent,8 if there is no rate for the 

intermediary involved in the 

transaction. See Assessment Policy 

Notice for a full discussion of this 

clarification. 

Notifications 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to the administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

notification of the destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results and this notice in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act. 

Dated: November 7, 2014. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2014–27165 Filed 11–14–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–890] 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of 

Court Decision Not in Harmony With 

Final Results of Administrative Review 

and Notice of Amended Final Results 

of Administrative Review Pursuant to 

Court Decision 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On October 28, 2014, the 

United States Court of International 

Trade (‘‘CIT’’) sustained the Department 

of Commerce’s (‘‘the Department’’) 

results of redetermination, pursuant to 

the CIT’s remand order, in Lifestyle 

Enterprise, Inc., et al., v. United States, 

Consol. Ct. No. 09–00378.1 Consistent 

with the decision of the United States 

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

(‘‘CAFC’’) in Timken Co. v. United 

States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) 

(‘‘Timken’’), as clarified by Diamond 

Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United 

States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) 

(‘‘Diamond Sawblades’’), the 

Department is notifying the public that 

the final judgment in this case is not in 

harmony with the Department’s AR 3 

Final Results 2 and is amending the final 

results with respect to the margins 

assigned to Guandong Yihua Timber 

Industry Co., Ltd. (‘‘Yihua Timber’’) for 

the period of review (‘‘POR’’) January 1, 

2007 through December 31, 2007. 

DATES: Effective Date: November 7, 

2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Stolz, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–4474. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Subsequent to the publication of the AR 

3 Final Results, various plaintiffs filed 

complaints with the CIT to challenge 

certain aspects of the AR 3 Final Results 

of the Department’s third administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on wooden bedroom furniture from the 

People’s Republic of China. 

In Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. v. United 

States, 768 F. Supp. 2d 1286 (Ct. Int’l 

Trade 2011), the CIT remanded the case 

to the Department to ‘‘explain or 

otherwise resolve’’ Orient International 

Holding Shanghai Foreign Trade Co. 

Ltd.’s (‘‘Orient’’) separate rate, the data 

set for wood inputs, the tariff heading 

for medium density fiberboard, whether 

Global Classic Designs, Inc, and Diretso 

Design Furnitures, Inc. produce 

comparable merchandise through a 

comparable production process, 

surrogate labor value, and negative 

export pricing. 

In Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. v. United 

States, 844 F. Supp. 2d 1283 (Ct. Int’l 

Trade 2012), the CIT remanded the case 

to the Department to re-determine 

Orient’s AFA rate and to re-open the 

record to gather more evidence with 

respect to wood inputs, or to use the 

volume-based data set to value wood 

inputs. 

In Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. v. United 

States, 865 F. Supp. 2d 1284 (Ct. Int’l 

Trade 2012), the CIT remanded the issue 

of Orient’s AFA rate to the Department 

for reconsideration for a second time. 

In Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. v. United 

States, 751 F.3d 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2014), 

the CAFC reversed the CIT’s decision to 

require the use of volume-based data in 

valuing the lumber inputs, and 

remanded the issue to the Department 

for further proceedings consistent with 

its opinion. 

Timken Notice 

In its decision in Timken, 893 F.2d at 

341, as clarified by Diamond Sawblades, 

the CAFC held that, pursuant to section 

516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the ‘‘Act’’), the Department 

must publish a notice of a court 

decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with 

a Department determination and must 

suspend liquidation of entries pending 

a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s 

October 28, 2014, judgment sustaining 

the WBF Final Remand constitutes a 

final decision of that court that is not in 

harmony with the AR 3 Final Results. 

This notice is published in fulfillment 

of the publication requirements of 

Timken. 

Amended Final Results 

Because there is now a final court 

decision with respect to the AR 3 Final 

Results, the revised weighted-average 

dumping margin for the period January 

1, 2007 through December 31, 2007, for 

Yihua Timber is 21.53 percent. The 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES