alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 220 (Friday, November 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 68245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26881]



[[Page 68245]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in or To Acquire Companies Engaged 
in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than December 10, 2014.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (Adam M. Drimer, Assistant Vice 
President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:
    1. H Bancorp LLC, Columbia, Maryland, to acquire additional voting 
shares of Bay Bancorp, Inc., Columbia, Maryland, and thereby indirectly 
acquire additional shares of Bay Bank, FSB, Lutherville, Maryland, and 
thereby engage in operating a savings association, pursuant to section 
225.28(b)(4)(ii).

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 7, 
2014.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-26881 Filed 11-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NB CAPITAL
CORPORATION'S UNAUDITED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND UNAUDITED
STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 INCLUDED IN NB
CAPITAL CORPORATION'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001049551
<NAME>                        NB CAPITAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     Canadian Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                          64,604,461
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  424,221,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               488,826,261
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 488,826,261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              335,357
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                          3,001
<COMMON>                                                 1
<OTHER-SE>                                     488,490,904
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   488,826,261
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,458,634
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   335,521
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,123,113
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,123,113
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,123,113
<EPS-BASIC>                                         28,525
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       28,525



</TABLE>
Understanding the 

Significance of Integrating 

Codes & Standards into the 

Learning Environment

BRYAN HOSKINS, PHD, PE (BRYAN.HOSKINS@OKSTATE.EDU

VIRGINIA CHARTER, PHD, PE (VIRGINIA.CHARTER@OKSTATE.EDU
Project Background

Video Modules for Classroom Use

Explain the Role of Various Codes & 

Standards

Explain the Consensus Process in 

Code & Standard Development
Codes & 

Standards

Introduction

ANSI

Product 

Standards

ICC ITM

NFPA

Conclusion
Video Effectiveness

Pretest/Posttest

5 Questions

Tied to the Learning Objectives

Pretest Average: 2.7 (both video & lecture)

Posttest Average: 4.1 (video) & 4.2 (lecture)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND MEMBERS' CAPITAL AND STATEMENTS OF
CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 1997,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR ACME
INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001049530
<NAME> ACME INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, LLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,288
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,812
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,720
<PP&E>                                          13,131
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 287,899
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,704
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,474
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   287,899
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,132
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,918
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (15,600)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (17,066)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       767
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (10,854)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (16,299)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 15.1
                          CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE


August 14, 2000

ESG Re Limited
Skandia International House
16 Church Street
Hamilton, Bermuda

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of ESG Re Limited and subsidiaries for the periods ended June 30,
2000 and 1999, as indicated in our report dated August 14, 2000; because we did
not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000 is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-40107 on Form S-8
and in Registration Statement No. 333-76983 on Form S-3.

We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche
----------------------
Deloitte & Touche
Dublin, Ireland
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

DAVID N. KINARD, DOC #T98053, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2859 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed October 16, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Samantha L. Ward, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Larry Darnell BELCHER, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-7470.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 2004.

Decided Dec. 28, 2004.

Larry Darnell Belcher, Appellant pro se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Office of the United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Larry Darnell Belcher seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for a certificate of appealability arising out of his action under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitution*290al right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Belcher has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
v. 

1.

1.

2.

Case: 1:20-cr-00391 Document #: 57 Filed: 10/08/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:235
3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

Case: 1:20-cr-00391 Document #: 57 Filed: 10/08/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:236
8.

 _____________________________________ 

Case: 1:20-cr-00391 Document #: 57 Filed: 10/08/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:237
#### United Order of Good Samaritans *v.*Betts.

Opinion delivered December 9, 1929.

*635
      *A. D. Whitehead,*for appellant.

*Sheffield S Coates,*for appellee.

McHaney, J.

This is the second appeal of this case. The opinion on the former appeal may be found in 179 Ark. 203, 14 S. W. (2d) 1108. The case was reversed because of an erroneous instruction given by the trial court which, in effect, nullified a by-law of the order providing that dues should be paid by the 10th of each month, and that, if they were not so paid, the delinquent member should be automatically suspended, and no liability enforced against the order during such suspension.

On a retrial there was ag'ain a verdict and judgment for appellee. For a reversal it is again urged, as in the former appeal, that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict as to the time of payment of dues, and that no proof of death had been made within sixty days after death of the insured, as required in the by-laws. The evidence on both points is substantially the same in this record as in the other, and the former opinion concludes appellant on both points. We there said: “The testimony was conflicting as to whether the dues had been paid within the time required by the by-laws, and was legally sufficient to support a finding either way on that subject.” On the other point we said: “There was conflicting testimony as to whether the proof of death had been made within sixty days after the death of the insured, as the by-laws of the order required. On behalf of appellee the testimony was to the effect, (1) that proof of death was furnished within the sixty days, and (2) that, within that time, the order denied liability on the certificate: Proof of either of these facts would suffice to meet the requirement in regard to proof of death, and we think the testimony was legally sufficient to support both of them.”

Appellant requested an instruction providing against a ¿recovery if the jury should find no proof of death was *636made within sixty days. The court modified it by adding, “unless you further find that defendant denied liability on the policy within said sixty days.” It is said that this modification was error. But not so. We specifically so held on the former appeal .of this case. See also *Mut. Ben. H. & A. Assn.*v. *Tilley,*176 Ark. 525, 3 S. W. (2d) 320.

It is finally said that the court erred in admitting the receipt for dues, which did not show on its face what it was for, .and was not dated. Appellee identified the receipt as dues for January. Appellant’s witness Burton identified it as having been issued by her as a receipt for dues, but for a different time. Since both parties agree that it was a receipt for dues, we can see no error in admitting the writing. Since it did not speak for itself as to what dues were being paid, it was proper for each party to testify to its purpose, and for the jury to determine the truth of the matter.

We find no error, and the judgment is affirmed.
File Name Description

type-3.an2 One rarely used low-resolution (250 ppi) grayscale fingerprint image.

type-4-14-slaps.an2 Left and right 4-finger flats (fgp 14 and 13) in type 4 records, and two-thumbs (fgp 15, merged 

fgp 11 and 12 thumb images) in a type 14 record.

type-4-slaps.an2 Left and right 4-finger flats and individual thumbs (fgp 14, 12, 13, 11) in type 4 records.

type-4-tpcard.an2 All 10 rolled fingers (fgp 1-10), and four flats. (fgp 11-14),

type-5.an2 One rarely used low-resolution (250 ppi) binary fingerprint image.

type-6.an2 One rarely used high-resolution (500 ppi) binary fingerprint image.

type-7-latent.an2 One non-standard type 7 latent fingerprint image.

type-8-sig.an2 One simulated signature image.

Type-9-10-14.an2 One type 14 finger with NIST standard minutiae, and a SAP level 10 (driver's licence) facial 

type-9-13-9-14-m1.an2 One latent type 13 and one exemplar type 14, both with M1 minutiae. Minutiae are matched to 

fingerprint images using IDC.

type-9-13-m1.an2 Latent image and M1 minutiae.

type-9-13-std.an2 Latent image and NIST standard minutiae.

type-9-4-iafis.an2 Latent image in type 4 record, with IAFIS minutiae.

type-9-14-m1.an2 One type 14 finger with M1 minutiae.

type-9-14-std.an2 One type 14 finger with NIST standard minutiae.

type-10-14-17-piv-index-iris.an2 SAP level 15 PIV facial image, both index fingers, and left iris.

type-10-branded-tattoo-mark.an2 Hand drawn branded tattoo and track mark images.

type-10-sap10.an2 SAP level 10 driver's licence photo. (Gray background replaced with pantone 277 light blue.)

type-10-scar-sap50.an2 One scar on arm image and a set of SAP level 50 facial images.

type-10-tattoo-face-sap20.an2 Large tattoo image, and SAP level 20 coffee stained legacy mug shot.

type-10-tattoo-zoom.an2 Zoomed out tattoo image, and cropped high resolution closeup.

type-13-14-latent-match.an2 A latent fingerprint and matching exemplar.

type-13-tip-eji-j2l.an2 One tip, and four EJI impressions in two images.

type-13-tip-eji-wsq.an2 One tip, and four EJI impressions in two images.

type-14-amp-nqm-utf8.an2 Flat images of two-thumbs, and right and left four fingers (fgp 13-14). Finger 9 “amputated” by 

using GIMP to edit the image. UTF8 content:

type-14-tip-eji-j2l.an2 One tip and four EJI impressions, at 1000 ppi.

type-14-tip-eji-wsq.an2 One tip and four EJO impressions, scaled down to 500 ppi.

type-14-tpcard-nqm.an2 Tenprint card images (fgp 1-14) with NIST quality values for each, including the four-finger 

type-15-palms.an2 Two random grayscale images of about the size of a palm, one WSQ, one JP2L. [Not real palm 

type-17-iris.an2 A blocky grayscale iris image.
#### J. W. Phelps & Co. *v.*Wm. V. Loving *& Co.*

Attorney and Client — Lien for Attorney’s Fees — Suit to Set Aside Fraudulent Conveyance — Judgment for Defendant — No Lien.

An attorney has a lien upon all ehoses in action, accounts or other claims or demands put in his hands for suit or collection and upon the judgments recovered. But he is not entitled to a lien where he represents a defendant in a suit to set aside a conveyance as fraudulent against creditors, where the judgment dismissed the action only.

APPEAL FROM BUTLER CIRCUIT COURT.

November 1, 1871.

OPINION by

Judge Peters:

By an act of the Legislature approved January 26, 1866, Myer’s Supp. 685, a lien is given to an attorney upon any ehoses in action, account or other claim, or demand put into his hands for suit or collection, and upon judgments in actions prosecuted by him to recover, when the judgment is for money, for the amount of any fee which may reasonably have been agreed on by the parties. Or in the absence of such agreement, for a fair and reasonable fee for the services of such attorney.

Appellees were allowed the fees complained of, not for prosecuting a suit, or suits on ehoses in action, accounts or demands put in their hands, or the hands of either of them, nor were there any judgments for money in either of the cases in favor of their clients, but they were the attorneys for Hosey against whom Phelps and others were prosecuting suits to subject a tract of land to the payment of debts, which they held against Hosey’s vendor, on a charge that the conveyance as to them was fraudu*272lent — and the judgment recovered by their client for whom they were defending said suits was to dismiss the petitions against him, and that he should recover their costs against them. It is apparent from an inspection of the *Act, supra,*and the character of the judgment, that it was not such as authorized the court to take any action in their favor. The court had no jurisdiction to render the judgment which this suit seeks to record, nor had appellees any lien, from anything that appears in the record, on the land which was the subject of the litigation, in which they represented said Hosey.

*Jasnes, for appellant.*

It will be time enough to decide on what property the Act of 21st of January, 1871, 1. vol. sess; Acts, 1871, p. S, gives attorneys liens for their fees, and the effect of that abt, when a case shall arise subsequent to its passage. The allowance to appellee was made prior to that act, and as it only took effect from its passage, and had no retrospective operation, this case is not embraced by it. Wherefore the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions to dismiss the petition.
**Exhibit 31.2** **CERTIFICATION**     I, Stephen J. Hawrysz, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of Eagle Test Systems, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     (b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition    instructions contained in SEC Release    No. 34-47986];     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to    materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over    financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors:     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.      By: /s/  Stephen    J. Hawrysz**Stephen J. Hawrysz****Chief Financial Officer**     Date: December 8, 2006