alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.4

Eastern Division

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03758

Honorable Thomas M. Durkin

Long Leaf Trading Group, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, February 28, 2022:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Unopposed motion for

extension of time to file response [94] is granted. Mr. Ruth's, Mr. Donelson's and Long

Leaf's responses to the motions for summary judgment are due by 3/4/2022. CFTC's reply

is due by 3/25/2022. Mailed notice. (ecw, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 95 Filed: 02/28/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2535
Although the request for comments primarily focuses on participation of federal agencies in standards

setting, the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA) offers its perspective on the

conformity assessment aspect of the topic.  A2LA is the largest internationally‐recognized laboratory

accreditation body in the United States and one of the leading accreditation bodies in the world.  A2LA is

a 501c3 non‐profit organization headquartered in Frederick, Maryland.

Conformity assessment carried out by third‐party private sector organizations is well established and

recognized by several sectors and federal agencies.  When there is a need to provide a formal assurance

of the competence of conformity assessment bodies, accreditation by internationally recognized

accreditation bodies should be the preferred means of assurance.  

  

The infrastructure in the form of the multilateral mutual recognition arrangements (Arrangements) of

the International  Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC)(www.ilac.org) and the International

Accreditation Forum (IAF)(www.iaf.nu) are already in place for recognizing accreditation bodies so there

is no reason for federal agencies to administer their own system, either to administer accreditation itself

or a recognition program for accreditation bodies.  ILAC is an international cooperation of laboratory

and inspection accreditation bodies formed more than 30 years ago to help remove technical barriers to

trade.  The ILAC Arrangement (MRA) has been in place for 10 years.  IAF is the world association of

conformity assessment accreditation bodies and other bodies interested in certification in the fields of

management systems, products, services, and personnel.  The IAF Arrangement has been in place for 12

years.  Both Arrangements are based upon results of rigorous, periodic peer evaluations to ensure

accreditation bodies to capable of determining competence in their respective field of operation.

Several federal agencies including the CPSC, EPA, DoD, and NRC already use the ILAC and

representatives of those agencies participate in the ILAC Arrangement Committee.  

If the government has special requirements for conformity assessment and accreditation, they should

be considered in the standards development process or by ILAC and/or IAF as appropriate.  This is the

most cost effective means for federal agencies to participate in conformity assessment and

accreditation activities rather than developing their own programs.  

  

On a related matter, the NIST Guidance on Federal Conformity Assessment Activities published in

August 2000 needs to be updated to include reference to ILAC and IAF.  A proposed revision is attached

as part of this set of comments.         

Sincerely,

Peter Unger

A2LA President & CEO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Illinois State Rifle Association, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04270

Honorable Mary M. Rowland

Brendan F. Kelly, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, January 14, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Defendants' motion to

stay deadline to respond to Amended Complaint [65] is granted. Mailed notice. (dm, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04270 Document #: 66 Filed: 01/14/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:276
#### Phil POTTER, Claimant-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-7253.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 20, 2004.

ORDER

Pursuant to the Court’s letter dated September 23, 2004,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

This appeal is dismissed.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 279

Recognizing the contribution that child care professionals make to the

wellbeing of children and their families.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 23, 1997

Ms. DELAURO (for herself and Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the

Workforce

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the contribution that child care professionals

make to the wellbeing of children and their families.

Whereas more than 12,000,000 children under age 5, including half of all infants under age 1, in the United States,

spend at least part of their day in the care of someone

other than their parents;

Whereas there are millions of additional children under the

age of 12 in the United States who are in some form of

child care at the beginning and end of the school day as

well as during school holidays and vacations;

Whereas for parents who must work, child care services that

are dependable and of high quality make it easier to find

and keep a job;
2

•HRES 279 IH

Whereas good child care helps parents reach and maintain

economic self-sufficiency;

Whereas a solid partnership between parents and loving,

trained child care professionals is essential to ensure the

quality of child care;

Whereas the availability of child care that is reliable, convenient, and affordable is essential to maintaining and expanding the workforce of the United States and is vital

for a parent making a successful transition from welfare

to work;

Whereas poor compensation and limited opportunities for

professional training and education contribute to high

staff turnover among child care providers, which disrupts

the creation of the strong provider-child relationships

that are critical to the healthy development of children;

Whereas the quality of child care has decisive and long-lasting effects on how children develop socially, emotionally,

and academically, and how the children cope with stress;

Whereas studies indicate that children who require child care

services do better in child care settings with trained, licensed, and accredited child care professionals; and

Whereas a national day of recognition for child care professionals would help people in the United States understand and appreciate the role of child care for working

families, will highlight the importance of the parent-provider partnership, will provide opportunities to showcase

skilled, nurturing providers and quality child care settings, and will energize more capable people to become

child care professionals: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the contribution that child care professionals make
3

•HRES 279 IH

1 to the wellbeing of children and their families, and re2 quests that the President issue a proclamation recognizing

3 such contribution.

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

SUGARTOWN WORLDWIDE LLC, 

TOMMY BAHAMA GROUP, INC., and

SOUTHERN TIDE, LLC,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MEMORYHOME STORE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 20-cv-02187

Judge Sara L. Ellis

Magistrate Judge Sidney I. Schenkier

SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, a judgment was entered in the above action on July 22, 2020 [52], in favor

of Plaintiffs Sugartown Worldwide LLC, Tommy Bahama Group, Inc., and Southern Tide, LLC 

(collectively “Plaintiffs”) and against the Defendants Identified in Schedule A in the amount of 

two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) of trademark statutory damages and one hundred 

thousand dollar ($100,000) of copyright statutory damages per Defaulting Defendant, and Lilly 

Pulitzer acknowledges payment of an agreed upon damages amount, costs, and interest and 

desires to release this judgment and hereby fully and completely satisfy the same as to the 

following Defendant:

Defendant Name Line No.

DoraHouse 42

THEREFORE, full and complete satisfaction of said judgment as to the above-referenced 

Defendant is hereby acknowledged, and the Clerk of the Court is hereby authorized and directed 

to make an entry of the full and complete satisfaction on the docket of said judgment.

Case: 1:20-cv-02187 Document #: 57 Filed: 10/02/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:2470
2

Dated this 2nd day of October 2020. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ RiKaleigh C. Johnson

Amy C. Ziegler

Justin R. Gaudio

RiKaleigh C. Johnson

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500

Chicago, Illinois 60606

312.360.0080 

312.360.9315 (facsimile)

aziegler@gbc.law

jgaudio@gbc.law

rjohnson@gbc.law

Counsel for Plaintiffs Sugartown Worldwide LLC, 

Tommy Bahama Group, Inc., and Southern Tide, 

LLC

Case: 1:20-cv-02187 Document #: 57 Filed: 10/02/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:2471
CFTC Ex. 300

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-10 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1074
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-10 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:1075
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-10 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:1076
H. Res. 540

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 16, 1998.

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the

House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE: Mr. Sherman.

Attest:

Clerk.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
               (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


I, KUO-AN WANG, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) of Kid Castle Educational Corporation (the "Registrant"), certifies
that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 of the Registrant (the
"Report"):

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


      /s/ Kuo-An Wang
------------------------------
Name: Kuo-An Wang
Date:       April 15, 2003


                                  Exhibit 99.1
#### Wyone L. SOWELL, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 05-3017.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: Nov. 9, 2004.

ORDER

Order Vacated, See 120 Fed.Appx. 814.

The petitioner having failed to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
EXHIBIT 31.2
 
 CERTIFICATIONS
 
 I, Hillard C. Gardner, certify that:
 
 1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cavalry Bancorp, Inc.;
 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 4) The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15-d-15 (e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5) The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: November 7, 2003
byHillard C. GardnerSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Citizens Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, William V. Humphreys, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/ William V. Humphreys
--------------------------------------
William V. Humphreys
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 2, 2005

                                       18
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2346

SAM DRAKULICH; JEANNE DRAKULICH,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; INTERNAL REVENUE

SERVICE, Criminal Investigation Division;

D. ARRVIN REEDY; SCOTT G. ADAMS,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

ANNE MORRIS PRICE, Agent, Department of the

Treasury; C. STEVEN KARGAUER; JACK PETRI, District Manager, Department of the Treasury;

GEORGE E. SUTTON; NANCY REINITZ, Ombudsman,

Internal Revenue Service; C. A. MOORE; NANCY

GIVENS, Examination Division, Internal Revenue

Service; SAL BARETTA; AILEEN CONDON; RETTA

JONES; N. LAURA HARRISON; MARIE ANNE BORSUK,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-96-11-A)

Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 30, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.
2
3

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sam Drakulich, Jeanne Drakulich, Appellants Pro Se. Patricia

McDonald Bowman, Teresa Thomas Milton, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's orders granting

summary judgment to the government on their tax refund suit and

dismissing their remaining state law claims against Reedy and

Adams. Because Appellants failed to meet the jurisdictional prerequisites to maintaining a refund suit in district court, summary

judgment was properly entered in favor of the government and we

affirm. See 26 U.S.C. §§ 6511, 6532(a), 7422 (1994). Our review the

record and the district court's order dismissing the Appellants'

state law claims discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Drakulich v. Internal

Revenue Service, No. CA-96-11-A (E.D. Va. Sept. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001049530
<NAME> ACME INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, LLC

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,986
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,945
<ALLOWANCES>                                       911
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,751
<PP&E>                                          30,450
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,336
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 354,664
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,854
<BONDS>                                         227,91
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,484
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   354,664
<SALES>                                         53,432
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,432
<CGS>                                           39,381
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,215
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (18,171)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (19,796)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,954)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (21,954)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,636
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,636
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Albert J. Finch, certify, that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of OptimumBank.com d/b/a
     OptimumBank;

2.   Based on my knowledge, the annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we
     have:

     (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     (c)  presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent function):

     (a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the
          internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
          ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and
          have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses
          in internal controls; and

     (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls;

6.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated  in this
     annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
     controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the internal
     controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including
     any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
     weaknesses.


    Date: March 31, 2005            By: /s/ Albert J. Finch
          -------------------           ------------------------------
                                        Albert J. Finch, Chief Executive Officer