alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 216 (Friday, November 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 66382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26509]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Advisory Council for the Elimination of Tuberculosis Meeting 
(ACET)

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC), announces the following meeting of the aforementioned 
committee:

Times and Dates

8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m., December 2, 2014
8:30 a.m.-2:30 p.m., December 3, 2014

    Place: Corporate Square, Corporate Boulevard, Building 8, 1st 
Floor Conference Room, Atlanta, Georgia 30329, telephone (404) 639-
8317. This meeting is also accessible by Webinar.

For Participants

    URL: https://www.mymeetings.com/nc/join/.
    Conference number: PW8649920.
    Audience passcode: 4223129.
    Participants can join the event directly at: https://www.mymeetings.com/nc/join.php?i=PW8649920&p=4223129&t=c.
    USA Toll-free +1 (800) 857-9615, Participant code: 4223129.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available. 
The meeting room accommodates approximately 100 people.
    Purpose: This Council advises and makes recommendations to the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Assistant Secretary for 
Health, and the Director, CDC, regarding the elimination of 
tuberculosis. Specifically, the Council makes recommendations 
regarding policies, strategies, objectives, and priorities; 
addresses the development and application of new technologies; and 
reviews the extent to which progress has been made toward 
eliminating tuberculosis.
    Matters for Discussion: Agenda items include the following 
topics: (1) Drug Shortages--Non-U.S. based drug manufactures and 
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval and FDA's role in 
addressing drug shortages; (2) TB elimination--Stop TB Elimination 
Plan Update and the Perspectives from National Tuberculosis 
Controllers Association (NTCA) and the Nation's TB Control Programs; 
(3) Updates from Workgroups; and (4) other tuberculosis-related 
issues. Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for More Information: Margie Scott-Cseh, Centers 
for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE., M/S E-07, 
Atlanta, Georgia 30333, telephone (404) 639-8317.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register Notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Claudette Grant,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2014-26509 Filed 11-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
#### D. M. Kittinger *v.*Humphreys, Jett & Co.

Vendor and Purchaser — Suit to Enforce Purchase Money Lien — Lien Must be Alleged in Petition.

In order to entitle the holder of a note for purchase money to a lien on the land, it must be alleged in the petition that a lien was reserved on the land for the unpaid purchase price.

APPEAL PROM McCLEAN CIRCUIT COURT.

November 8, 1871.

*Boyd, fo rappellant.*

*Bicker, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

It is not alleged in the petition that a lien was reserved on the land for the unpaid purchase price by stating in the assignment of the title bond of Jett by Hendrix to Dossett the amount of purchase money which remained unpaid, which is necessary, as was decided by this court in *Taylor v. Ford, etc.,*1 Bush 44, in order to entitle the holder of a note for purchase money to a lien on the land.

Nor does the evidence establish a fraudulent combination, etc., between Jett & Dossett in making the conveyance for the land without a reservation of a lien.

Wherefore the judgment must be affirmed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 25, 2015

No. 04-14-00508-CV

Rudy MENDEZ,

Appellant

v.

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO BUILDING STANDARDS BOARD,

Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-08659

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On December 4, 2014, the trial court signed an order granting the contests to appellant’s 

affidavit of indigence. On January 21, 2015, the trial court filed a supplemental clerk’s record 

containing a copy of the trial court’s order and a copy of the contest filed by appellee, the City of 

San Antonio. The trial court’s order indicates contests were also filed by the Bexar County 

District Clerk, and Judy Stewart the official reporter of the 45th District Court. However, the 

supplemental clerk’s record does not contain a copy of those contests. 

On February 9, 2015, appellant filed a letter that we construed as an appeal from the trial 

court’s order granting the contests. As a result, on February 12, 2015, we ordered the clerk of 

the trial court and Ms. Stewart to file—no later than March 4, 2015—the appropriate 

supplemental clerk’s record and the reporter’s record from the contest hearing that occurred on 

or about December 4, 2014. 

On February 17, 2015, the Bexar County District Clerk, Ms. Stewart, and all other court 

officials and court reporters having an interest in the costs accruing in this suit filed a motion 

with this court asking us to consider as timely-filed their contest that was “inadvertently filed in 

the Fourth Court of Appeals.” In the motion, counsel for the contestants stated the contest was 

accidently filed with this court on November 18, 2014, instead of with the trial court. Because it 

is apparent from the trial court’s order granting the contests that all parties were before the court 

and the trial court considered the contestants’ objections to appellant’s affidavit of indigence, we 

GRANT the motion.
The clerk of the trial court and Ms. Stewart are reminded that, pursuant to the February 

12, 2015 order of this court, a supplemental clerk’s record and a reporter’s record from the 

hearing that occurred on or about December 4, 2014 are due March 4, 2015.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of February, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Tanavionne Marcell Robertson, Appellant

No. 06-16-00093-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 6th District Court of Lamar 

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 26412). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Tanavionne Marcell Robertson, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED FEBRUARY 1, 2017

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
NVLAP ASSESSOR BULLETIN AB-30-2020 PAGE 1 OF 1

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology

National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

ISSUE DATE:

April 01, 2020

ASSESSOR BULLETIN NUMBER: AB-30-2020

LAP: ALL

SUBJECT: Implementation of the NVLAP Assessment Plan for assessor use in preparing for 

assessments and updated Laboratory Assessment Instructions for Assessors

The purpose of this bulletin is to 1) inform NVLAP assessors of the implementation of the NVLAP

Assessment Plan, which is to be used by the assessors in the development of the agenda for an assigned 

assessment; and 2) announce the issuance of the updated NLVAP Laboratory Assessment Instructions for 

Assessors.

NVLAP ASSESSMENT PLAN

Per ISO/IEC 17011:2017 section 7.4.7, the accreditation body is required to develop an assessment plan 

which covers the activities to be assessed, identify the location(s) and personnel to be assessed. and the 

techniques that will be utilized to perform the management and technical review necessary.

Based on this requirement, when an assessment is assigned, the program manager will complete the 

assessment plan, which provides information on the purpose of the assessment (on-site, monitoring, 

follow up, etc.), the scope (full, relocation, scope expansion, etc.), the lab locations (main, sub, field, 

etc.), personnel type (authorized signatories, technical and/or quality staff, etc.), applicable assessment 

techniques (witness, interview, walk/talk through, procedure review, etc.) and any notes for the 

assessor(s). The program manager will upload the assessment plan to the NVLAP Interactive Web 

System (NIWS) for the assigned laboratory.

Beginning on April 1, 2020, any assessor (lead or team member) assigned to an assessment after this date 

will be able to view the assessment plan for that assessment. The assessment plan will be located for 

each assessment under the Assessor Documents tab in the Assessment Documents group in the file named 

Assessment Plan.

Assessors are expected to use the information included on the assessment plan when creating the agenda 

for the laboratory’s assessment.

In addition, a copy of the agenda will be required to be uploaded during the report submission. 

LABORATORY ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS FOR ASSESSORS

In addition, NVLAP has updated the Laboratory Assessment Instructions for Assessors to reflect the 

current processes for the preparation and performance of the assessment, as well as the generation and 

submission of the report documentation. The updated Laboratory Assessment Instructions for Assessors 

is now maintained in the Documents Library, which can be located on the home screen of the Assessor 

Portal.

Please contact your program manager if you have any questions regarding the location and use of the 

assessment plan and assessment instructions when preparing for the on-site assessment.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Fiscal Service

# AGENCY:

Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This is Supplement No. 3 to the Treasury Department Circular 570, 2014 Revision, published July 1, 2014, at 79 FR 37398.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given by the Treasury that the above-named company formally changed its name as follows:

*BITCO General Insurance Corporation (NAIC #20095).*                     Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference copies of the Treasury Circular 570 (“Circular”), 2014 Revision, to reflect this change.                

                    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at                     *http://www.fms.treas.gov/​c570.*

Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room D22, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

Dated: November 12, 2014.

Kevin McIntyre,

Manager, Financial Accounting and Services Branch, Bureau of the Fiscal Service.

[FR Doc. 2014-27111 Filed 11-14-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-35-P
H. Res. 525

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 11, 1998.

Resolved, That the Committee on the Judiciary shall review the communication received on September 9, 1998, from

an independent counsel pursuant to section 595(c) of title 28,

United States Code, transmitting a determination that substantial and credible information received by the independent

counsel in carrying out his responsibilities under chapter 40

of title 28, United States Code, may constitute grounds for

an impeachment of the President of the United States, and

related matters, to determine whether sufficient grounds exist

to recommend to the House that an impeachment inquiry be

commenced. Until otherwise ordered by the House, the review

by the committee shall be governed by this resolution.

SEC. 2. The material transmitted to the House by the

independent counsel shall be considered as referred to the

committee. The portion of such material consisting of approximately 445 pages comprising an introduction, a narrative, and a statement of grounds, shall be printed as a document of the House. The balance of such material shall be
2

•HRES 525 EH

deemed to have been received in executive session, but shall

be released from the status on September 28, 1998, except

as otherwise determined by the committee. Material so released shall immediately be submitted for printing as a document of the House.

SEC. 3. Additional material compiled by the committee

during the review also shall be deemed to have been received

in executive session unless it is received in an open session

of the committee.

SEC. 4. Notwithstanding clause 2(e) of rule XI, access

to executive-session material of the committee relating to the

review shall be restricted to members of the committee, and

to such employees of the committee as may be designated by

the chairman after consultation with the ranking minority

member.

SEC. 5. Notwithstanding clause 2(g) of rule XI, each

meeting, hearing, or deposition of the committee relating to

the review shall be conducted in executive session unless otherwise determined by an affirmative vote of the committee, a

majority being present. Such an executive session may be attended only by members of the committee, and by such em-
3

•HRES 525 EH

ployees of the committee as may be designated by the chairman after consultation with the ranking minority member.

Attest:

Clerk.
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-1536

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Brien Leroy Watson, Jr., also known as Brian Watson lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central

____________ Submitted: July 16, 2021 Filed: July 21, 2021 [Unpublished]

____________ Before SHEPHERD, GRASZ, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.Brien Watson appeals after the district court 1 revoked his supervised release

and sentenced him to 11 months in prison. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief challenging the sentence. After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Watson, as it properly considered the applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e); there was no indication that it overlooked a relevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors, see United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-18 (8th Cir. 2009) (substantive reasonableness of revocation sentence is reviewed under deferential abuse-of-discretion standard); see also United States v. White Face, 383 F.3d 733, 740 (8th Cir. 2004) (district court need not mechanically list every § 3553(a) factor when sentencing defendant upon revocation; all that is required is consideration of relevant matters and some reason for court’s decision); and the sentence was within the advisory Guidelines range, and below the statutory limit, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. -2-
NVLAP ASSESSOR BULLETIN AB-18-2012 PAGE 1 OF 1

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology

National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

ISSUE DATE:

December 14, 2012

ASSESSOR BULLETIN NUMBER: AB-18-2012

LAP: Calibration

SUBJECT: Gage Block Comparison with Dissimilar Materials

The purpose of this bulletin is to provide guidance to assessors relative to the assessment of 

laboratories performing comparisons of gage blocks of dissimilar materials.

The results of the last two rounds of gage block proficiency tests (PTs) indicate a need for many

of the laboratories to improve their performance in a specific area of this discipline. Over a third 

of the laboratories, 7 of 19, that reported doing chrome gage blocks had unsatisfactory results for 

their PT due to the chrome measurements. Two additional laboratories did not have an 

unsatisfactory PT overall, but did have one chrome block with an En > 1. In the latter case, the 

PT consisted of 26 measurements, thereby allowing one measurement outside of the limit. In 

sum, almost half of the participating laboratories had concerns in this area.

A common denominator among the laboratories with PT concerns was that they had only steel 

masters and were doing a chrome-to-steel comparison. Many of these labs reported the same 

uncertainty as their steel-to-steel comparison measurements.

NVLAP believes one way to encourage performance improvement in the area of chrome 

calibrations is to provide additional assessment scrutiny of it. However, as chrome calibrations 

are rare, this subject might not come up under normal assessment sampling. Therefore, at 

assessments where no observation of a chrome calibration is possible, NVLAP requests that 

assessors query the laboratories about how they would perform such a calibration. Assessors 

must determine if the laboratory is familiar with the added uncertainty contributors associated 

with doing comparisons between different materials. Specifically, assessors are directed to ask 

to review an uncertainty budget and a calibration certificate of a chrome calibration.

Please direct any questions regarding this communication to Tom Hettenhouser; 301-975-2013; 

thomas.hettenhouser@nist.gov.
H. Res. 520

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 15, 1998.

Whereas the game of baseball is America’s national pastime;

Whereas one of the grandest records in baseball, and indeed

in all sport, is the record for the most home runs hit in

a single Major League Baseball season;

Whereas during the 1998 Major League Baseball season,

Mark McGwire of the St. Louis Cardinals and other fine

players have challenged the Major League Baseball single-season home run record, bringing great excitement to

the 1998 Major League Baseball season and capturing

the imagination of the people of the United States and

baseball fans around the world;

Whereas Mark McGwire of the St. Louis Cardinals has been

subjected to intense pressure and media scrutiny, but has

conducted himself with uncommon grace, class, and dignity, and has been a first-rate role model for the young

people of St. Louis, the State of Missouri, and the United

States; and

Whereas on September 8, 1998, Mark McGwire of the St.

Louis Cardinals hit his 62nd home run of the 1998

Major League Baseball season, breaking the Major

League Baseball single-season home run record: Now,

therefore, be it
2

•HRES 520 EH

Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates and commends Mark McGwire of the St. Louis Cardinals—

(1) for breaking the Major League Baseball singleseason home run record;

(2) for bringing great excitement to the 1998 Major

League Baseball season; and

(3) for being an inspiration to the youth of America

and the world and baseball fans everywhere.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.2

Eastern Division

David Evans III, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02453

Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer

Thomas J. Dart, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, May 11, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: Parties are directed to

submit a written status report within 60 days, by 7/13/2020. Notice mailed by judge's staff

(ntf, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02453 Document #: 9 Filed: 05/11/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:85