alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.23**

**EXECUTION COPY**

**EXTENSION OF EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

This EXTENSION OF EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Extension”) is made as of February 28, 2009 by and between Atlantic Broadband Management, LLC, aDelaware limited liability company (the “Company”), and Patrick Bratton (“Executive”). 

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered anExecutive Employment Agreement dated March 1, 2004 (the “Agreement”) which will expire on February 28, 2009; 

WHEREAS the Company andExecutive desire to enter into a new employment agreement; and 

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive wish to extend the terms of the Agreement on an interimbasis for a period of six months to allow parties sufficient time to enter a new agreement. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenantscontained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

Section 1. Extension of Employment Period The Employment Period shall be extended for a period of six months, beginning on the date of this Extension, unless terminated earlier under the provisions of Section 5(a) (ii) – (iii) or by execution of a new employment agreement by Company and Executive. The term “fifth anniversary” is amended to read “fifth anniversary plus six months” wherever it appears in theAgreement. In all other respects, the Agreement shall remain unamended. 

Section 2. Retroactive Effect The terms and consideration as agreed toby Company and Executive in a new employment agreement to be entered into following the date hereof shall apply retroactively to March 1, 2009. 

Section 3. Capitalized Terms Capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Agreement. 

Section 4.Governing Law. Issues and questions concerning the construction, validity, enforcement and interpretation of this Extension will be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to anychoice of law or conflict of law rules or provisions (whether of the State of Delaware or any other jurisdiction) that would cause the application of the laws of any jurisdiction other than the State of Delaware. In furtherance of the foregoing, theinternal law of the State of Delaware will control the interpretation and construction of this Extension, even though under Delaware’s choice of law or conflict of law analysis, the substantive law of some other jurisdiction would ordinarilyapply. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Extension of Executive Employment Agreement as of the datefirst written above. 

 
ATLANTIC BROADBAND MANAGEMENT, LLCBy: 
 
Name: Title: 
 
Patrick Bratton
#### Geo. E. Cook *v.*I. W. Scott, Administrator of Robt. Tunis.

Trials — Instructions—Objection and Exception.

An objection to an instruction must be made at the time the court is asked to give it, and if it is then given the ruling of the court must be excepted to.

APPEAL FROM FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT.

October 7, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

The bill of exceptions in this case does not show that the instructions asked for by appellee were objected 'to at the time by appellant, but the appellant excepted after they were given. This *188is not sufficient under Sec. 364, *Civ. Co.*The instructions must be objected to at the time the court is asked to give them, and if they are then given must except to the ruling of the court, *Kennedy & Bro. v. Cunningham,*3 *Met.*538. As no objections were made when they were offered, any error in giving them must be deemed as waived. All the instructions asked for by appellant were given, and no objections were made to the evidence. The judgment, therefore, must be affirmed.

*H. B. Cooke, for appellant.*

*Kinkead & Buckner, for appellee.*
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 53 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 53

  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that 
  committee reports accompanying reported bills and joint resolutions 
    contain a detailed analysis of the impact of the bill or joint 
                        resolution on children.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 1997

    Mrs. Maloney of New York (for herself, Ms. Christian-Green, Mr. 
Cummings, Mr. Farr of California, Mr. Fattah, Ms. McKinney, Mr. Miller 
   of California, Ms. Norton, Mr. Olver, Mr. Payne, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. 
    Sanders, and Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas) submitted the following 
        resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that 
  committee reports accompanying reported bills and joint resolutions 
    contain a detailed analysis of the impact of the bill or joint 
                        resolution on children.

    Resolved, That (a) clause 2(l) of rule XI of the Rules of the House 
of Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(8) The report of a committee accompanying each bill or joint 
resolution of a public character shall contain a detailed analysis of 
the probable impact of the bill or resolution on children, including 
the impact on the number of children who are hungry or homeless.''.
    (b) The amendment made by this resolution shall apply to bills and 
resolutions reported after the ninetieth day beginning after the date 
of adoption of this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 11
 
                            PROMUS HOTEL CORPORATION
 
                       COMPUTATIONS OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
 
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         THREE MONTHS ENDED     SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                              JUNE 30,              JUNE 30,
                                                                        --------------------  --------------------
<S>                                                                     <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
                                                                          1997       1998       1997       1998
                                                                        ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income............................................................  $  47,376  $  52,189  $  86,278  $  88,205
                                                                        ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                                                        ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Basic Earnings per Share:
Weighted average outstanding shares...................................     86,916     87,202     86,992     86,773
                                                                        ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                                                        ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income............................................................  $    0.55  $    0.60  $    0.99  $    1.02
                                                                        ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                                                        ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Diluted Earnings per Share:
Weighted average outstanding shares...................................     86,916     87,202     86,992     86,773
Effect of dilutive securities:
Restricted stock......................................................          8         --          7         --
Stock options and warrants............................................      1,301        935      1,280      1,057
                                                                        ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Weighted average shares assuming conversion...........................     88,225     88,137     88,279     87,830
                                                                        ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                                                        ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income............................................................  $    0.54  $    0.59  $    0.98  $    1.00
                                                                        ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                                                        ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 371 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     February 26, 1998.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and that he is hereby, elected 
to the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on the Judiciary: Mr. Graham of South Carolina.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001049530
<NAME> ACME INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, LLC

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,617
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,151
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,048
<PP&E>                                          28,874
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,872
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 329,278
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,746
<BONDS>                                        198,271
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           15,366
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,875
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   329,278
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,635
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,332
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,430
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (26,107)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       936
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,171)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (25,171)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0.0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.0


</TABLE>
Delaware
    
    PAGE 1The First State
 I, JEFFREY W. BULLOCK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY
THE ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF MERCANTILE
BANCORP, INC. , FILED IN THIS OFFICE ON THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH, A .D. 2009, AT 5:53 OCLOCK
P.M.
 A FILED COPY OF THIS CERTIFICATE HAS BEEN FORWARDED TO THE
NEW CASTLE COUNTY RECORDER OF DEEDS.
 /s/ Jeffrey W Bullock2006806 8100
    

(SEAL)
    
    Jeffrey W Bullock, Secretary of StateAUTHENTICATION :7171041090242122
    
    
    DATE: 03-05-09You may verify this certificate online at corp.delaware.gov/authver.shtml




---



##### 



State of DelawareSecretary of StateDivision of CorporationsDelivered 06:00 PM 03/05/2009FILED 05:53 PM 03/05/2009SRV 090242122 - 2006806 FILE
 CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT
 OF
 CERTIFICATE
OF INCORPORATION
 OF
 MERCANTILE
BANCORP, INC.
     FOURTH
 1




---



##### 



Mercantile Bancorp, Inc.By:
    /s/ Ted T. AwerkampTed T. AwerkampPresident and Chief Executive Officer 2
#### William W. Hannan v. The Westchester Fire Insurance Company of New York.

[See *ante,*556.]

*Fire insurance.*

This case is ruled by *Hannan v. WilliamsburgJi City Fire Ins. Co., ante,*556.

Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.)

Argued June 5, 1890.

Decided June 27, 1890.

*Assumpsit.*Plaintiff brings error.

Keversed, and judgment entered here' for plaintiff for $884.82, with interest from the time whon the money became due under the policy.

The facts are stated in the opinion, and in *Hannan v. Ins. Co., supra.*

*A. G. Blodgett*and *John D. Conely,*for appellant.

*DeForest Paine (Thomas Bates,*of counsel), for defendant.

Cahill, J.

This case is governed by the case of *Hannan v. Williamsburgh Ins. Co., ante,*-. The only difference between this case and that lies in the fact that in the description of the property the word “while” is *562used before the phrase, “occupied by assured as a dwelling.” These cases were argued together as one case, and it was not seriously contended that this slight change in the policy made any difference with the construction which should be put upon it.

The case will be reversed, and a judgment entered in this Court for the plaintiff for $884.82, with interest from the time when the money became due under the policy, and costs of both courts.

The other Justices concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001049011
<NAME> OMNI DOORS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          102208
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                102208
<PP&E>                                           71164
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  173372
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         55767
<OTHER-SE>                                      117605
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    173372
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   110673
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (110673)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (110673)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (110673)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 220 (Friday, November 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 68222]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26956]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Procurement List; Proposed Addition

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed addition to the procurement list.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to add a service to the Procurement 
List that will be provided by a nonprofit agency employing persons who 
are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    Comments Must Be Received on Or Before: 12/14/2014.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street, Suite 10800, Arlington, Virginia 22202-
4149.

For Further Information Or to Submit Comments Contact:  Barry S. 
Lineback, Telephone: (703) 603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#12515f46575477764077755253707b7e7b666b5d7c773c757d64"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ca89879e8f8cafae98afad8a8ba8a3a6a3beb385a4afe4ada5bc">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 8503(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide 
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed 
action.

Addition

    If the Committee approves the proposed addition, the entity of the 
Federal Government identified in this notice will be required to 
procure the service listed below from the nonprofit agency employing 
persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    The following service is proposed for addition to the Procurement 
List for provision by the nonprofit agency listed:

Service

Service Type/Locations: Mail Management and Support Service
    U.S. Navy, NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Center Norfolk, Naval Support 
Activity, 5450 Carlisle Pike, Building 112, Mechanicsburg, PA.
    U.S. Navy, NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Center Norfolk, Naval Support 
Activity Compounds, 700 Robbins Avenue, Building 27D, Philadelphia, 
PA
NPA: NewView Oklahoma, Inc., Oklahoma City, OK
Contracting Activity: Naval Support Fleet Logistics Center, Norfolk, 
VA

Barry S. Lineback,
Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014-26956 Filed 11-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1 Order filed June 17 , 2014

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00127

- CV

____________ IN RE ROBERT M. SPRA GUE , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 257th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2005

- 48988



### CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER
On February 11, 2014, relator, Robert M. Sprague, filed a petition for writ of
mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221. In the petition relator complained of a number of pretrial evidentiary rulings issued by The Honorable Judy Warne, Judge of the 257th District Court, Harris County, Texas, in
trial court cause number 2005

- 48988, styled In the Matter of the Marriage of R.M. Sp rague and D.L. Sprague

. This court requested a response to the petition from real party in interest to be filed on or before February 18, 2014. On February 18, 2014, the parties in the2 underlying case filed a joint motion to suspend this court’s deadline for filing a

response to the petition because the parties are attempting to settle the case. On February 25, 2014, we granted the parties’ motion to suspend, abated the case for a period of thirty days from the date of the abatement order, and directed re lator and real party in interest to advise the court of the status of the settlement.
Upon the advisement of the real party in interest that the parties were still attempting to settle the under case, we issued two orders on April 4, 2014
, and May 7, 2014, each continuing the abatement of the case for an additional per iod of thirty days from the dates of the orders , and directing the relator and real party in
interest to advise the court of the status of the settlement.
On June 6, 2014, rea l party in interest advised this court that the parties are still attempting to settle the case, and requested the abatement be continued. We
GRANT the request.
Therefore, the abatement of this case is continued for an additional period of thirty days, at which time relator and real party in interest are directed to advise the court of the status of the settlement. The original proceeding will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the parties file a motion to dismiss the original proceeding o r other dispositive motion. The court also will consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the original proceeding, or the court may reinstate the original proceeding on its own motion.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Wise.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

STEVEN BROOKS, DAVID CHAVEZ, and 

1540 N. MILWAUKEE LLC d/b/a DSTRKT 

BAR & GRILL, and on behalf of all others 

similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY 

d/b/a ComEd and EXELON 

CORPORATION, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 1:20-cv-04555 

Honorable Jorge L. Alonso

MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE OF GAYLE E. LITTLETON 

Pursuant to Local Rule 83.17, Defendant Commonwealth Edison Company (“ComEd”) 

and Exelon Corporation (“Exelon”) requests leave to withdraw the appearance of Gayle E. 

Littleton as counsel for ComEd and Exelon. In support thereof, ComEd and Exelon states as 

follows: 

1. On September 2, 2020, Ms. Littleton entered an appearance on behalf of ComEd 

and Exelon as a Partner of Jenner & Block LLP. 

2. Ms. Littleton is no longer a Partner at Jenner & Block LLP. 

3. ComEd and Exelon will continue to be represented by the undersigned counsel of 

record from Jenner & Block LLP. 

4. Neither party will be prejudiced by the withdrawal of the appearance of Ms. 

Littleton. 

WHEREFORE, ComEd and Exelon respectfully requests that the Court enter an order 

granting leave to withdraw the appearance of Gayle E. Littleton as counsel for ComEd and Exelon. 

Case: 1:20-cv-04555 Document #: 26 Filed: 11/18/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:165
2 

Dated: November 18, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Terrence J. Truax

Terrence J. Truax 

E. Glenn Rippie 

JENNER & BLOCK LLP 

353 N. Clark Street 

Chicago, IL 60654-3456 

Telephone: (312) 222-9350 

Facsimile: (312) 527-0484 

Counsel for Defendants Commonwealth 

Edison Company and Exelon Corporation 

Case: 1:20-cv-04555 Document #: 26 Filed: 11/18/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:166
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, Terrence J. Truax, an attorney, certify that I caused copies of the foregoing MOTION 

TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE OF GAYLE E. LITTLETON to be served on all counsel 

of record via the Court’s electronic filing system. 

/s/ Terrence J. Truax

Counsel for Defendants Commonwealth Edison 

Company and Exelon Corporation 

Case: 1:20-cv-04555 Document #: 26 Filed: 11/18/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:167