alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Chapter 3 

Community Disaster 

Resilience for the Built 

Environment

Presenter: Chris D. Poland

Consulting Engineer

NIST Disaster Resilience Fellow
The Built Environment

Buildings

Individual structures including the equipment 

and contents that house people and support 

social institutions

Building Clusters

A set of Buildings that serve a common function 

such as housing, healthcare, retail, etc.

Infrastructure

Physical networks, systems, and structures 

that supportcommunity social institutions 

including transportation, energy, 

communications, water and waste water. 
Recovery of the Built Environment

Organize around recovering functionality over time

Source: National Disaster Recovery Framework

When is each cluster and system needed for recovery?
Just in Time Functionality Needs

• Short -Term: Secure, Rescue, Stabilize, Clear Routes

• Clusters: Critical Facilities, Emergency Housing

Related Infrastructure Systems 

• Mid-Term: Restore Neighborhoods, meet social needs

• Clusters: Housing, healthcare, main street, schools, Churches

• Related Infrastructure Systems

• Long-Term: Community Social and Economic Recovery

• Clusters: Commercial and Industrial Businesses

• Related Infrastructure Systems
Pathway to Resilience

Figure 3.1b
Determine and characterize Hazards 

• Prevalent Hazards

• Wind, Earthquake, Inundation, 

• Fire, Snow, Rain, 

• Human caused

• Hazard Level: 

• Routine level that is expected to occur frequently

• Expected level equal to the design level used for buildings

• Extreme level that is the maximum considered possible

•

• Hazard Intensity:

• Area affected defined as “local, community, or regional”

• Disruption Level defined as “minor, moderate, or severe”
Performance Metric for Buildings

• Level of Functionality after the event

• Operational, 

• Useable during Repair, 

• Not Usable, 

• Collapse

• Recovery time available

• Days, 

• Weeks, 

• Months 
Set goals for Building Clusters

Percentage of functional building's in a cluster available 

30%: Able to initiate Assigned Activities

60%: Able to initiate usual operations

90%: Operating at normal capacity
Infrastructure Systems 

Performance Metrics and Goals

Level of functionality after the event

I: 90% service within days, 100% within weeks

II: 90% service within weeks and 100% within months

III: 90% service within months and 100% within years

Percentage of service available for each system 

30%: Initiate assigned activities

60%: Initiate usual operations

90%: Operating at normal capacity
Example Summary Resilience Matrix

Centerville Example: Routine, Localized, Minor disruption
Example Summary Resilience Matrix

Centerville Example: Expected, Community, Moderate
Example Summary Resilience Matrix

Centerville Example: Extreme , Regional, Severe Disruption
Disaster Resilience and the 

Built Environment

Input sought from the Breakout sessions

• Confirm that the Pathway to Resilience is complete and 

doable.

• Identify experiences in implementing similar plans

• Determine effective strategies to integrate the plan into 

Community Planning efforts
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 2406** 

FRANCISCA DE JESUS DURAN

- DE

- GARCIA , Petitioner ,
v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General , Respondent
.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
.
Submitted : May 29, 2014 Decided: June 18, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

P etition denied by un published per curiam opinion
.
Michael E. Rosado, LAW OFFICES OF ROSADO & SOLTREN, P.C., Beltsville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General, Terri J. Scadron, Assistant Director, Kathryn L. Deangelis, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opi nions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Francisca De Jesus Duran

- De

- Garcia (Duran) , a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing her appeal from the Imm igration Judge’s denial of her requests for asylum and withholding of removal. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Duran’s merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. See INS v. Elias

- Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Duran

- De

- Garcia , (B.I.A. Oct. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 32.1

 

**Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of MPC Corporation (the “*Company*”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “*Report*”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

|           | /s/ John Yeros                       |
|----------------|--------------------------------------|
| March 31, 2007 | John Yeros                           |
|           | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
KEVIN D. JEWELL

SHAREHOLDER

DIRECT DIAL NO.(713) 654

- 9620

E

- MAIL: kevin.jewell@chamberlainlaw.com

February 9, 2015

Christopher Prine, Clerk

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

301 Fannin, Room 245

Houston, Texas 77002

Re: No. 14

- 14 -00077- CV ; MKM Engineers, Inc., et al v. Jal B. Guzder ; in

the Fourteenth Court of Appeals, Houston, Texas.

Dear Mr. Prine :

This matter is scheduled for oral argument February 11, 2015.

Justice Murry Cohen will argue on behalf of Appellant MKM Engineers,

Inc., and Kevin Jewell will argue on behalf of Appellant PIKA International, Inc.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Kevin D. Jewell

Kevin D. Jewell

KDJ/dlk

171 7782 _1 ACCEPTED

14-14-00077-CV

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

2/9/2015 3:28:32 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERKFebruary 9 , 201 5

Page 2

Via electronic service

Adam Q. Voyles

Lubel Voyles LLP

5020 Montrose Blvd., Ste. 800

Houston, Texas 77006

Via electronic service

Alan N. Magenheim

Magenheim & Associates

3701 Kirby Drive, Suite 1144

Houston, Texas 77098

Via electronic service

Michael L. Orsak, L.P.

611 Houston Street

Richmond, Texas 77469

Via electronic service

Murry B. Cohen

Ak in, G ump, S trauss, H auer &

Feld LLP

1111 Louisiana Street, 44th Floor

Houston, Texas 77002
**Exhibit 12**

 

Dated:  June 30, 2005

 

I, David Balai, certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed thisannual report on Form 20-F, and all reports on Form 6-K containing distributionor servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year coveredby this annual report, of Permanent Financing (No. 5) PLC, Permanent Funding(No. 1) Limited and Permanent Mortgages Trustee Limited;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge,the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by thisannual report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, thedistribution or servicing information required to be provided to the trustee bythe servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

 

4.  Based on my knowledgeand upon the annual compliance statement included in the report and required tobe delivered to the mortgages trustee in accordance with the terms of thepooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and except as disclosed in thereports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement; and

 

5.  The reports discloseall significant deficiencies relating to the servicer’s compliance with theminimum servicing standards based upon the report provided by an independentaccountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform SingleAttestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in thesereports.

 

In giving the certificationsabove, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the followingunaffiliated parties: Halifax plc

 

Date: June 30, 2005

 
| By:                                                 | /s/David Balai |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|----------------|--------|
| Title: Director, Permanent  Funding (No. 1) Limited |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Richard L. Schreck, Secretary/Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of
Airxcel, Inc., certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Airxcel, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
     prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: 8-12-03

By: /s/ Richard L. Schreck
   --------------------------------------------
Richard L. Schreck
Secretary/Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

                                       16
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40552

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HECTOR ARIEL BELMARES-HERNANDEZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:04-CR-421

Before KING, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Hector Ariel

Belmares-Hernandez (Belmares) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed

a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Belmares

has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s

brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 20, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Consolidated
Financial Statements for the quarter ended 9/30/98 for DigiTEC 2000, Inc. and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                            1,140,740
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1,933,367
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                         108,377
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    202,524
<PP&E>                                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3,837,148
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            16,922,854
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                              61
<COMMON>                                              7,059
<OTHER-SE>                                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3,837,148
<SALES>                                           6,218,606
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  6,218,606
<CGS>                                             5,057,552
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    216,060
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (2,089,812)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (2,089,812)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                              0
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.30)



</TABLE>
No. 87-6117.

#### Page *v.*Georgia.

Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.
3-DIMENSIONAL PRINTING 

RADIAL COLLIMATORS FOR 

NEUTRON REFLECTOMETRY

ETHAN SEIDE (NCNR, MARET SCHOOL)

MENTOR: BRIAN MARANVILLE (NCNR)
RADIAL COLLIMATORS

Focus neutrons by absorbing any 

that are not directed at a point on 

the detector

When a sample is placed in front of 

the collimator, the neutrons are 

scattered

The detector measures how far the 

neutrons scatter from the 

convergence point of the collimator
OVERVIEW

Build a radial collimator for the 

NCNR's MAGIK off-specular 

reflectometer

Radial collimators can cost 

$30,000 and are made with 

huge pieces of metal

Determine whether a radial 

collimator could be built using a 

simple 3D printer
BENEFITS OF A COLLIMATOR

Pinhole Slits
TESTS WITH MCSTAS SIMULATIONS

2 Pinhole Slits Radial Collimator & Vertical Slits
3D PRINTERS

NIST Library: LulzBot® TAZ 5 

Printers

NCNR: MakerBot® Replicator 2 

Printer

Fused Deposition Modeling 

(FDM) Printers

Makerbot® Replicator 2 at 

NCNR
GUIDE FRAMES

5 Frames, each with different finger 

spacing

Thin strips of polypropylene are placed 

between the fingers to direct neutrons 

towards point on detector

Easily print prototypes in 2-4 hours out 

of PLA/ABS plastics

Fingers
RESULTS

Initial tests successfully 

focuses neutrons

Performs better farther 

away from the detector
MODIFIED FRAMES & 

RAIL SYSTEM

Added a groove on the bottom of the 

frame to fit on a rail

Shifting the frames along the rail will 

allow for the angle of convergence of the 

neutrons on the detector to be changed
RAIL

Rail-to-frame holes spaced 10 mm apart, 

which allow for a wide range of different 

frame positioning

Rail-to-rail connections allow the rail to 

be customizable in length
FUTURE ADDITIONS

• Replace frames with half-frame, 

"combs"

• Print on higher resolution 3D 

printers

• Print out of Boron Carbide (B4C)

• Develop a spring system to 

automatically adjust the angle of 

convergence

Comb prototype
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Charles Majkrzak

Nick Maliszewskyj & Phil Chabot

Julie Borchers & Yamali Hernandez
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7340

LELMON JACKSON TERRELL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GERALDINE MIRO, Warden; ALLENDALE CORRECTIONAL

INSTITUTION; CHARLES CONDON,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-3408-6-10AK)

Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: November 23, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lelmon Jackson Terrell, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka,

Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Lelmon Jackson Terrell seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. §

2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Terrell v. Miro, No. CA-97-3408-6-10AK

(D.S.C. Aug. 19, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-30634 Summary Calendar

IVORY WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant,
versus BURL CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee.

________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 99-CV-795

________________________________________

November 30, 2000 Before POLITZ, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ivory Williams, Jr. appeals the rejection of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition in which he challenges his conviction on guilty plea of aggravated kidnapping. The district court granted a certificate of appealability.1 Venegas v. Henman , 126 F.3d 760 (5th Cir. 1997). 2 Our review of the trial court’s denial of habeas relief is de novo as relates to legal issues and for clear error as relates to factual determinations. 1 Williams contends that he pleaded guilty to a constitutionally defective indictment and that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance in connection with the entry of his guilty plea thereon. Our review of the record persuades that these contentions are without merit and are therefore rejected. The judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
Continuing Education Units

VERIFICATION OF ATTENDANCE FORM

Certification Number: ________________

 attended the following professional educational activity. 

(NAME)

Title: Federal Cybersecurity Workforce Webinar: Security Clearance Effective Practices and Solutions to 

Support Federal Cybersecurity Work

Date(s): October 25, 2022 CEU Hours Earned: 1.5 hrs 

Sponsor(s): National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 

Explanation of Event: This webinar will identify when a security clearance is necessary for cybersecurity work and when 

agencies can proceed without requiring a clearance. The speakers will highlight government policy as well as effective 

practices and solutions of federal government agencies for creating processes to ensure that security clearances, when 

required, can be obtained in a timely and efficient manner for federal employees and contractors. Webinar attendees will

hear presentations from: 

• Bill Pedersen, Personnel Security Specialist – Stakeholder Liaison, U.S. Office of Personnel Management

• Kyla Power, Executive Project Coordinator, Office of the Director of National Intelligence

• David Harvey, Engagement Manager, Center for Securing the Homeland, MITRE 

Location: Virtual Event; https://www.nist.gov/news-events/events/2022/10/federal-cybersecurity-workforce- 

 webinar-security-clearance-effective

Name of Meeting Host: Elizabeth Lee, Program Analyst, Federal Bureau of Investigation 

 

Contact Information:

nist.gov/nice 

nice@nist.gov

The Continuing Education Units form is provided as a courtesy. It is the responsibility of the 

attendee to complete and submit with their certifying authority.