alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

House Calendar No. 270

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 580

[Report No. 105–791]

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 131) waiving

certain enrollment requirements for the remainder of the One Hundred

Fifth Congress with respect to any bill or joint resolution making general

or continuing appropriations for fiscal year 1999.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 1998

Mr. DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res.

131) waiving certain enrollment requirements for the

remainder of the One Hundred Fifth Congress with respect to any bill or joint resolution making general or

continuing appropriations for fiscal year 1999.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider in the House the joint resolu3 tion (H.J. Res. 131) waiving certain enrollment require4 ments for the remainder of the One Hundred Fifth Con-
2

HRES 580 RH

1 gress with respect to any bill or joint resolution making

2 general or continuing appropriations for fiscal year 1999.

3 The joint resolution shall be considered as read for amend4 ment. The previous question shall be considered as ordered

5 on the joint resolution to final passage without intervening

6 motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the joint resolu7 tion equally divided and controlled by the Majority Leader

8 and the Minority Leader or their designees; and (2) one

9 motion to recommit.

House Calendar No. 270

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 580

[Report No. 105–791]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution

propriations for fiscal year 1999.joint resolution making general or continuing apdred Fifth Congress with respect to any bill orquirements for the remainder of the One Hun-(H.J. Res. 131) waiving certain enrollment reOCTOBER 7, 1998

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 350 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 28, 1998.
Whereas on February 4, 1948, the people of Sri Lanka gained their independence 
        from the British;
Whereas the people of Sri Lanka and the United States have a common interest in 
        the promotion and preservation of democratic systems of government;
Whereas the people of Sri Lanka and the United States have had many shared 
        values and interests, including the desire to promote the peaceful 
        development of the South Asian region;
Whereas Sri Lankan citizens who have visited or lived in the United States, and 
        United States citizens who have visited or lived in Sri Lanka, have done 
        much to improve mutual understanding and build friendship over the past 
        fifty years;
Whereas United States citizens of Sri Lankan origin have contributed greatly to 
        the advancement of knowledge, the development of the United States 
        economy, and the enrichment of cultural life in the United States;
Whereas the ties of trade and investment between the United States and Sri Lanka 
        have grown over fifty years to the benefit of the people of both 
        countries; and
Whereas the fiftieth anniversary of the independence of Sri Lanka offers an 
        opportunity for Sri Lanka and the United States to renew their 
        commitment to international cooperation on issues of mutual interest and 
        concern: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates the people of Sri Lanka on the occasion of the 
        fiftieth anniversary of their nation's independence; and
            (2) looks forward to broadening and deepening United States 
        cooperation and friendship with Sri Lanka in the years ahead for the 
        benefit of the people of both countries.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 500 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 15, 1998.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 3267) to direct the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bureau 
of Reclamation, to conduct a feasibility study and construct a project to 
reclaim the Salton Sea. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. In 
lieu of the amendment recommended by the Committee on Resources now printed in 
the bill, the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the report of 
the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as 
adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as 
amended, and on any further amendment thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Resources; (2) a further amendment printed in the Congressional 
Record pursuant to clause 6 of rule XXIII, if offered by Representative Miller 
of California or his designee, which may be considered notwithstanding the 
adoption of the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the report of 
the Committee on Rules, shall be considered as read, and shall be separately 
debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 
opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert H. SMITH; Patsy L. Smith, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 04-30325.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Jan. 7, 2005.

Cristina Walker, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Shreveport, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Leroy White, Baton Rouge, LA, for Defendants-Appellants.

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Robert H. and Patsy L. Smith have appealed orders of restitution imposed by the district court on resentencing. The Smith’s motion to strike portions of the Government’s brief is DENIED AS MOOT, while their motion to waive the requirement to provide a diskette is GRANTED. Finding no error in the ultimate result reached by the district court, we AFFIRM. *See United States v. Early,*27 F.3d 140, 141-42 (5th Cir.1994).

*378AFFIRMED. MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF BRIEF DENIED AS MOOT; MOTION TO WAIVE PROVIDING A DISKETTE GRANTED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING )

COMMISSION, )

)

Plaintiff, ) Case No. 20-cv-03758

)

v. ) Judge: Hon. Thomas M. Durkin

)

LONG LEAF TRADING GROUP, INC., )

JAMES A. DONELSON, TIMOTHY )

M. EVANS, JEREMY S. RUTH, and )

ANDREW D. NELSON, )

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF FILING

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Friday, September 18, 2020, James A. 

Donelson filed his Answer to the Complaint, a copy of which was previously served 

upon you, with the Clerk of the Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern 

Division.

Nicholas P. Iavarone 

The Iavarone Law Firm, P.C. 

2516 Waukegan Road, #399

Glenview, Illinois

(312) 637-9466

(800) 417-0580 (fax) 

niavarome@iavaronefirm.com

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 22 Filed: 09/18/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:142
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Nicholas P. Iavarone, an attorney admitted to practice law in the State of Illinois, declares that on

September 18, 2020 he caused a copy of the attached Notice of Filing to be served via email to:

(aburden@cftc.gov)

Ashley J. Burden

Senior Trial Attorney/Chicago Regional Office

Division of Enforcement

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

312-596-0693

Nicholas P. Iavarone 

The Iavarone Law Firm, P.C. 

2516 Waukegan Road, #399

Glenview, Illinois 60025

(312) 637-9466

(800) 417-0580 (fax) 

niavarome@iavaronefirm.com

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 22 Filed: 09/18/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:143
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kaitlyn Adams","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kaitlyn-e-adamsnasa-gov\/","title":"NASA Educator Professional Development (EPD) Opportunities","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"otUwW3gdxI\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/nasa-educator-professional-development\/\">NASA Educator Professional Development (EPD) Opportunities<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/nasa-educator-professional-development\/embed\/#?secret=otUwW3gdxI\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Educator Professional Development (EPD) Opportunities” — NASA\" data-secret=\"otUwW3gdxI\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/ngs-workshop-image.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":459}
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jamel Johnnie GREEN, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-7360.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 2004.

Decided Dec. 23, 2004.

Jamel Johnnie Green, Appellant pro se.

Ethan Ainsworth Ontjes, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Jamel Johnnie Green seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of its order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr.,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S. Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on July 23, 2003. The notice of appeal was filed on August 9, 2004. Because Green failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONFURNISHED PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Pliant Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Harold C. Bevis,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)    The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ HAROLD  C. BEVIS      |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | Harold C. Bevis           |
|   | *Chief Executive Officer* |
|   | * *                  |
|   | August 14, 2006           |

 

----
9770.

#### Stuckey *v.*The State.

Decided November 16, 1918.

Accusation of possessing intoxicating liquor; from city court of Dublin—Judge Elynt. April 15,, 1918.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of having in his possession intoxicating liquors. The State’s witnesses testified, that they found the defendant drunk in his store, and that he had *76about eight quarts of whisky iu suit-cases on the foot of his “bunk” in the store; that the store was locked; and that there was no one in there except the defendant. The defendant contended, that he was not drunk, but was sick; that he did not own the whisky or kno.w anything about it; and that it was put in his store without his knowledge or consent.

*75Harwell, J.

The only question involved was one of fact, which the jury determined. The evidence amply authorized the verdict, which was approved by the trial judge. No error of law appears in the special grounds of the motion for a new trial, and the judgment is

*Affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*

*76
      *Fred*Kea, for plaintiff in error.

*S. P. New, solicitor,*contra.
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 389

AN ACT

To authorize the use of certain grant funds to establish an information clearinghouse that provides information to increase public access to

defibrillation in schools.

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 389

AN ACT

To authorize the use of certain grant funds to establish

an information clearinghouse that provides information

to increase public access to defibrillation in schools.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 389 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Automatic

3 Defibrillation in Adam’s Memory Act’’.

4 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE ACT.

5 Subsection (c) of section 312 of the Public Health

6 Service Act (42 U.S.C. 244), as amended by Public Law

7 107–188, is amended—

8 (1) at the end of paragraph (5), by striking

9 ‘‘and’’;

10 (2) by redesignating paragraph (6) as para11 graph (7); and

12 (3) by inserting after paragraph (5) the fol13 lowing:

14 ‘‘(6) establish an information clearinghouse that

15 provides information to increase public access to

16 defibrillation in schools; and’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 12,

2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
Chapter 3. Test Procedures – For Packages Labeled by Volume Handbook 133 – 2018

82

NIST Handbook 133, “Checking the Net Content of Packaged Goods,” 2018 edition

Chapter 3. Test Procedures – For Packages Labeled by Volume

Editorial correction to step 5.

b. Test Procedure for Cylinders Labeled by Volume

1. Follow Section 2.3.1. “Define the Inspection Lot.” Use a “Category A” sampling plan in the 

inspection; select a random sample.

2. Determine the temperature of the cylinders in the sample. Place the thermometer approximately 

halfway up a cylinder in contact with the outside surface. Take the temperature of three cylinders 

selected at random and use the average temperature of the three values.

3. Using the appropriate pressure gage, measure the pressure of each cylinder in the sample.

4. Determine the cylinder nominal capacity from cylinder data tables or from the manufacturer. 

(These tables must be obtained in advance of testing.

5. The SCF/CF volume of compressed gases (e.g., oxygen, argon, nitrogen, helium, or hydrogen) 

shall be determined using NIST Standard Reference Database 23 “Reference Fluid 

Thermodynamic and Transport Properties Database” (REFPROP). (See 

www.nist.gov/std/srd/REFPROP.) (Note: Weights and measures officials should contact the 

NIST Office of Weights and Measures at (301) 975-4004 or owm@nist.gov for access to the 

database.) Using NIST Technical Note 1079 “Tables of Industrial Gas Container Contents 

and Density for Oxygen, Argon, Nitrogen, Helium, and Hydrogen” (available on-line at 

(65Twww.nist.gov/pml/wmd/65T), determine the value (SCF/CF) from the content tables at 

the temperature and pressure of the cylinder under test.

6. Multiply the cylinder nominal capacity by the value (SCF/CF) obtained from the content tables. 

This is the actual net quantity of gas.

7. Subtract the labeled net quantity from the actual net quantity to determine the error.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.1

Eastern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cr−00299

Honorable Andrea R. Wood

Hardy Lee Browner

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, January 23, 2024:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood as to Hardy Lee Browner:

Defendant's unopposed motion for permission to issue early return subpoenas [100] is

granted on a reciprocal basis. Mailed notice (lma, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cr-00299 Document #: 101 Filed: 01/23/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:266
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel, are you 

a 

 Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this Court’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 U.S.C.§1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on 

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

Case: 1:20-cv-04248 Document #: 45 Filed: 01/21/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:487
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel, are you 

a 

 Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this Court’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 U.S.C.§1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on 

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

Case: 1:20-cv-03591 Document #: 67 Filed: 09/30/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:293
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Paul Kim, certify that: 

 

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Cogent, Inc.; 

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report. 

 

Date: April 29, 2008