alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1  PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, Gordon L. Wiltse, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lions Petroleum Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.  Date: May 18, 2007/s/ Gordon L. Wiltse
Gordon L. Wiltse
Principal Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 386 Agreed to House (ATH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 386

Electing the Honorable Richard K. Armey of Texas to act as Speaker pro 
                                tempore.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 1998

 Mr. Boehner submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Electing the Honorable Richard K. Armey of Texas to act as Speaker pro 
                                tempore.

    Resolved, That the Honorable Richard K. Armey, a Representative 
from the State of Texas, be, and he is hereby, elected Speaker pro 
tempore on this day.
    Sec. 2. The Clerk of the House shall notify the President of the 
United States and the Senate of the election of the Honorable Richard 
K. Armey as Speaker pro tempore during the absence of the Speaker.
                                 <all>
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Katherine Schauer","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/ksschaue\/","title":"Getting NASA Data to the Ground with Lasers","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"9W8JUADwQY\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/technology\/getting-nasa-data-to-the-ground-with-lasers\/\">Getting NASA Data to the Ground with Lasers<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/technology\/getting-nasa-data-to-the-ground-with-lasers\/embed\/#?secret=9W8JUADwQY\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Getting NASA Data to the Ground with Lasers” — NASA\" data-secret=\"9W8JUADwQY\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/ogs-2_hawaii.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7455

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KERMIT LEE DOZIER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CR-92-88, CA-96-693)

Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 3, 1997

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kermit Lee Dozier, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Dee Griffith, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Dozier, Nos.

CR-92-88; CA-96-693 (E.D. Va. Sept. 6, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
----

Exhibit 21 

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY 

| **NAME OF SUBSIDIARY**                | **PERCENTAGE OF OWNERSHIP** | **DOMICILE**        |
|---------------------------------------|-----------------------------|---------------------|
|                                  |                        |                |
| Xtra-Gold    Mining Limited           | 100%                        | Republic of Ghana   |
|                                  |                        |                |
| Xtra-Gold    Exploration Limited      | 100%                        | Republic of Ghana   |
|                                  |                        |                |
| Xtra    Oil & Gas (Ghana) Limited | 100%                        | Republic of Ghana   |
|                                  |                        |                |
| Xtra    Energy Corp.                  | 100%                        | State of Florida    |
|                                  |                        |                |
| Xtra    Oil & Gas Ltd.            | 100%                        | Province of Alberta |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

OUYEINC LTD.,

Plaintiff,

v.

Alucy and et al., 

Defendants.

Case No. 20 cv 3490

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL UNDER RULE 41(a)(1)

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Ouyeinc Ltd.

(“Ouyeinc” or “Plaintiff”) hereby dismisses this action with prejudice pursuant to settlement as 

to the following Defendants:

Defendant Name Line No.

epadronics 222

simply_best_deal 580

Alucy 2

Duevin 28

Yotown 77

Dream-faster 27

Regisbelle 59

Ochun 52

JINGOU-tech 41

Case: 1:20-cv-03490 Document #: 48 Filed: 08/13/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:236
Elevin09 31

Codiak 22

Joyaria 42

Salmue 64

Cusco 24

DATED August 13, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ James A. Karamanis

James A. Karamanis

Barney & Karamanis, LLP

Two Prudential Plaza

180 N. Stetson, Ste 3050

Chicago, IL 60601

Tel.: 312/553-5300

Attorney No. 6203479

James@bkchicagolaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF Ouyeinc Ltd.

Case: 1:20-cv-03490 Document #: 48 Filed: 08/13/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:237
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 951 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 951

  To require the Secretary of the Interior to exchange certain lands 
                     located in Hinsdale, Colorado.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 1997

 Mr. McInnis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of the Interior to exchange certain lands 
                     located in Hinsdale, Colorado.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LARSON AND FRIENDS CREEK EXCHANGE.

    In exchange for conveyance to the United States of an equal value 
of offered lands acceptable to the Secretary of the Interior which lie 
within, or in proximity to, the Handies Peak or Red Cloud Peak 
Wilderness Study Areas or the Alpine Loop Backcountry Bi-way in 
Hinsdale County, Colorado, the Secretary of the Interior shall convey 
to Lake City Ranches, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership (in this 
section referred to as ``LCR''), approximately 560 acres of selected 
land located in the same county and generally depicted on a map 
entitled ``Larson and Friends Creek Exchange'', dated June 1996. The 
exchange shall be contingent upon LCR granting the Secretary a 
permanent conservation easement on the approximate 440 acre Larson 
Creek portion of the selected lands (as depicted on the map) which 
limits future use of such lands to agricultural, wildlife, 
recreational, or open space purposes. The exchange shall also be 
subject to the standard appraisal requirements and equalization payment 
limitations set forth in section 206 of the Federal Land Policy and 
Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1716), and to reviews and approvals 
relating to threatened species and endangered species, cultural and 
historic resources, and hazardous materials under other Federal laws. 
The costs of such appraisals and reviews shall be paid by LCR. The 
Secretary may credit such payments against the value of the selected 
land, if appropriate, pursuant to section 206(f) of the Federal Land 
Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1716(f)).
                                 <all>
```
Opinion issued October 18, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-12-00541-CV

———————————

XTREME COIL DRILLING MEXICO S.A. DE C.V., Appellant

V.

WEATHERFORD DE MEXICO S.A. DE C.V. AND WEATHERFORD 

INTERNATIONAL, LTD., Appellees

On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-40589

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. No opinion 

has issued. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot. 
2

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 19, 2019

NO. 03-19-00289-CV

Margarita Brito, Appellant

v.

Norma Brito, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the trial court on March 5, 2019. Having 

reviewed the record, the Court holds that appellant has not prosecuted her appeal and did not 

comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for 

want of prosecution. Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and 

in the court below.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D2023

- 02 9 1

_____________________________
K. L. H. J R

. , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. Susanne Wilson Bullard , Judge

.

December 11, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
B.L. T HOMAS , R OWE , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, Emmalyn Dalton, Assistant Public Defender, and Jasmine Russell Dixon, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
H. Res. 423

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 12, 1998.

Whereas drug abuse killed 14,218 Americans in 1995 and it

is estimated that nearly 114,000 Americans—many of

them our youth—will have died as a result of drug abuse

by the end of the period between 1992 and 2001, and it

is estimated that 13,000,000 Americans used illegal

drugs in 1996;

Whereas American taxpayers footed a $150,000,000,000 bill

for drug-related criminal and medical costs in 1997,

which is more than we spent in 1997’s Federal budget

for programs to fund education, transportation and infrastructure improvements, agriculture, energy, space and

all foreign aid combined;

Whereas 34 percent of Americans see drug interdiction as a

top priority foreign policy issue, above illegal immigration

and the threat of terrorism, and 39 percent of Americans

believe decreasing drug trafficking should be our primary

objective in United States policy toward Latin America;

and

Whereas the week of September 13 through 19, 1998 has

been designated as the ‘‘Drug-Free America Blue Ribbon

Campaign Week’’ to remind our children that they are

not alone in the fight for a Drug-Free America: Now,

therefore, be it
2

•HRES 423 EH

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House that—

(1) the House declares its commitment to create a

Drug-Free America;

(2) the Members of the House should work personally to mobilize kids, parents, faith-based and community

organizations, educators, local officials and law enforcement officers, as well as coaches and athletes to wage a

winning war on drugs;

(3) the House pledges to pass legislation that provides the weapons and tools necessary to protect our

children and our communities from the dangers of drug

addiction and violence; and

(4) the United States will fight this war on drugs

on three major battlefronts:

(A) Deterring demand.

(B) Stopping supply.

(C) Increasing accountability.

Attest:

Clerk.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 20, 2019

s1217 

# Order

Clerk December 20, 2019

160532

SC: 160532

In re DEAN, Minors. COA: 347946

Leelanau CC Family Division:

15

- 009603

- NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 15, 2019

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

John Louis Atkins, * From the 104th District Court

of Taylor County

Trial Court No. 20106B.

Vs. No. 11-18-00056-CR * March 19, 2020

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, S.C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., 

sitting by assignment)

 (Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
NVLAP ASSESSOR BULLETIN AB-14-2012 PAGE 1 OF 1

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology

National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

ISSUE DATE:

January 20, 2012

ASSESSOR BULLETIN NUMBER: AB-14-2012

LAP: Calibration

SUBJECT: Updated Assessment Instructions for Calibration Assessors

This bulletin announces the release of updated laboratory assessment instructions for calibration 

assessors and a new supplemental checklist. These instructions are necessary to verify 

compliance to ILAC-P14:12/2010, ILAC Policy for Uncertainty in Calibration.

The NVLAP Calibration Laboratories Accreditation Program has created a supplemental 

checklist for calibration laboratory assessments performed after April 1, 2012. The numbering 

of the checklist items correlates to the numbering scheme in ILAC-P14:12/2010. The notes 

found in the checklist are not all inclusive. The checklist is intended as an assessor aid, and it 

will help to communicate the requirements. The web link to ILAC-P14 is 

<http://www.ilac.org/documents/ILAC_P14_12_2010.pdf>.

Calibration assessors sample the certificates and reports issued under the scope of accreditation 

of the laboratories as verification of compliance of Section 5.10 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005 and 

NIST Handbook 150:2006. In addition to the NIST Handbook 150 general checklist, calibration 

assessors will now also use the supplemental checklist to specifically look for compliance with

ILAC-P14. Calibration assessors will include the completed supplemental checklist in their 

submission of the on-site report to the assessed laboratory and to NVLAP.

Please direct any questions you may have to your Program Manager.
Case 2:16-cr-00098-GMS Document 3 Filed 12/24/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:16-cr-00098-GMS Document 3 Filed 12/24/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:16-cr-00098-GMS Document 3 Filed 12/24/15 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 322 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     November 13, 1997.
Whereas at the conclusion of the Gulf War the United States and the United 
        Nations, acting through the Security Council, determined to find and 
        destroy all of Iraq's capability to produce chemical, biological, and 
        nuclear weapons and its ability to produce missiles capable of 
        delivering such weapons of mass destruction;
Whereas in pursuit of this goal, the United Nations set up a special 
        multinational commission of experts to oversee the completion of this 
        task (the United Nations Special Commission--UNSCOM), and that task 
        could and should have been accomplished within a matter of months if 
        Iraq had cooperated with United Nations officials;
Whereas sanctions were imposed upon Iraq to insure its compliance with United 
        Nations directives to eliminate its capability to produce weapons of 
        mass destruction;
Whereas for 6\1/2\ years Iraq has pursued a policy of deception, lies, 
        concealment, harassment, and intimidation in a deliberate effort to 
        hamper the work of UNSCOM in eliminating Iraq's ability to produce and 
        deliver weapons of mass destruction; and
Whereas recently the Government of Iraq has escalated its policy of 
        noncompliance and continues to breach in a material way United Nations 
        Security Council resolutions by refusing to permit United States 
        citizens who are recognized specialists to participate as members of 
        UNSCOM teams in carrying out in Iraq actions to implement Security 
        Council resolutions: Now, therefore, be it
    That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that--
            (1) the current crisis regarding Iraq should be resolved peacefully 
        through diplomatic means but in a manner which assures full Iraqi 
        compliance with United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding 
        the destruction of Iraq's capability to produce and deliver weapons of 
        mass destruction;
            (2) in the event that military means are necessary to compel Iraqi 
        compliance with United Nations Security Council resolutions, such 
        military action should be undertaken with the broadest feasible 
        multinational support, preferably pursuant to a decision of the United 
        Nations Security Council; and
            (3) if it is necessary, however, the United States should take 
        military action unilaterally to compel Iraqi compliance with United 
        Nations Security Council resolutions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```