alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
   ---------------------------------------------------------------

     I, Evon Au hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10K-SB/A of Thai One On,
Inc. and its wholly-owned Subsidiary, Thai Pasta Enterprise Sdn. Bhd.

2. Based on my knowledge, the annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by the annual report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the annual report, fairly present in all
material respects our financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows as of, and for, the periods presented in the annual report.

4. The other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and we have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
    material information relating to Thai One On, Inc., including
    its subsidiaries, if any, is made known to us by others within
    those entities, particularly during the period in which this
    annual report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
    procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
    filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)  presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
    effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
    our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  The other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to our auditors and the audit committee of our
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)  that there were no significant deficiencies in the design or
    operation of internal controls which could adversely affect our
    ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
    and have further advised our auditors that there we are not aware
    of any material weaknesses in our internal controls; and

b)  that there was no fraud, whether or not material, that involved
    our management or other employees who have a significant role in
    our internal controls; and

6.  The other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual
that there were no significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation.

                                   THAI ONE ON, INC., Registrant

Dated: June 16, 2005                /s/ Evon Au
                                   ------------------------------------
                                   By: Evon Au, Chief Executive Officer,
                                   President and Chairman of the Board
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00360

- CV

Mark Les her and Rhonda Lesher

v.

Charlie Doescher, Pat Doescher,
Apache Iron Metal & Auto Salvage,

Inc. d/b/a Apache Truck & Van Parts,
Gerald Coyel (aka Jerry Coyel) in his

individual capacity and d/b/a Apache

Truck & Van Parts, and Shannon

Coyel §

§

§

§ From the 348th District Court

o f Tarrant County (348

- 235791

- 09 )

October 10, 2013

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellants Mark Lesher and Rhonda Lesher shall

pay all of the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

S ECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_________________________________ C hief Justice Terrie Livingston
H. Res. 462

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 10, 1998.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 3150) to amend title 11 of the United States

Code, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill

shall be dispensed with. Points of order against consideration

of the bill for failure to comply with section 303(a) of the

Congressional Budget Act of 1974 are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one

hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary.

After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under

the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now

printed in the bill. The committee amendment in the nature
2

•HRES 462 EH

of a substitute shall be considered by title rather than by section. Each title shall be considered as read. All points of

order against the committee amendment in the nature of a

substitute are waived. No amendment to the committee

amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules

accompanying this resolution. Each amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered

only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the

report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an

opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not

be subject to a demand for division of the question in the

House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order

against the amendments printed in the report are waived.

The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any

amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum

time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without intervening business,

provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on the

first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the

conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with
3

•HRES 462 EH

such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member

may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment

adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
IV

House Calendar No. 137

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 324

[Report No. 105–403]

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R.

2607) making appropriations for the government of the District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in part against the

revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1998,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 12, 1997

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to

the bill (H.R. 2607) making appropriations for the government of the District of Columbia and other activities

chargeable in whole or in part against the revenues of

said District for the fiscal year ending September 30,

1998, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill

3 (H.R. 2607) making appropriations for the government of
2

HRES 324 RH

1 the District of Columbia and other activities chargeable

2 in whole or in part against the revenues of said District

3 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1998, and for

4 other purposes, with Senate amendments thereto, and to

5 consider in the House, any rule of the House to the con6 trary notwithstanding, a single motion offered by the

7 chairman of the Committee on Appropriations or his des8 ignee that the House concur in the Senate amendment to

9 the text with the amendment printed in the report of the

10 Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution and dis11 agree to the Senate amendment to the title. The Senate

12 amendments and the motion shall be considered as read.

13 The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided

14 and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

15 member of the Committee on Appropriations. The pre16 vious question shall be considered as ordered on the mo17 tion to final adoption without intervening motion or de18 mand for division of the question.

House Calendar No. 137

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 324

[Report No. 105–403]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendand for other purposes. for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1998, or in part against the revenues of said District lumbia and other activities chargeable in whole tions for the government of the District of Co- ments to the bill (H.R. 2607) making appropriaNOVEMBER 12, 1997

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
EXHIBIT 99.1.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of the registrant certify, to the best of their knowledge, that the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-QSB") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



Date: May 16, 2003



Avani International Group, Inc.



/s/ Robert Wang
Robert Wang

President, and

Chief Executive Officer





/s/ Dennis Robinson

Dennis Robinson

Treasurer, and

Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 388 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        March 19, 1998.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2870) to amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to facilitate 
protection of tropical forests through debt reduction with developing countries 
with tropical forests. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. 
General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on International Relations. After general debate the bill shall be 
considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to 
consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute 
rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 
International Relations now printed in the bill. The committee amendment in the 
nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. During consideration of the 
bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord 
priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment 
has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record 
designated for that purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII. Amendments so printed 
shall be considered as read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) 
postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole 
a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes 
the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows 
another electronic vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum 
time for electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 
minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 
Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as 
may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on any 
amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee 
amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 3.2





CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT


TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION


OF


MILLER EXPLORATION COMPANY,


A DELAWARE CORPORATION





Miller Exploration Company (the
Corporation), a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:





FIRST:    That, the board of directors of the Corporation, by unanimous written consent, adopted a resolution setting forth a proposed amendment to the certificate of incorporation
of the Corporation, declaring said amendment to be advisable and calling a meeting of stockholders of said Corporation for consideration thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:





RESOLVED, that the Article IV of the Corporations certificate of incorporation shall be amended, subject to
stockholder approval, to add the following paragraphs:





On the Split Effective Date (as defined
below), the Corporation shall effect a one-for-ten reverse stock split pursuant to which every 10 shares of the Corporations common stock issued and outstanding or held in treasury will be automatically converted into one new share of
common stock (the Reverse Stock Split). The Reverse Stock Split shall be effective as of the close of business on such date that the amendment to the Corporations certificate of incorporation adding this paragraph is filed with the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, as determined by the Corporations board of directors (the Split Effective Date). The Corporation shall not issue fractional shares to the stockholders entitled to a fractional interest
in a share of such common stock issued pursuant to the Reverse Stock Split,but shall round each fractional share up to the next whole number of shares. On the Split Effective Date, each certificate representing existing shares of common
stock will automatically be deemed for all purposes to evidence ownership of the appropriate reduced number of new shares of common stock without any action by the stockholder thereof. As soon as practicable after the Split Effective Date, the
Corporation or its agent shall notify the stockholders and request the surrender of their certificates for their existing shares with instructions as to how to receive new certificates.





SECOND:    That thereafter, pursuant to a resolution of the Corporations board of directors, a special meeting of the stockholders of the
Corporation was duly called and held, upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of shares as required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.





THIRD:    That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section
242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF 

ARKANSAS, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”,

Defendants.

Civil Action No.: 1:20-cv-03837

Judge Manish S. Shah

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey I. Cummings

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff hereby files this Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to any remaining Defendants 

that have not been subject to a prior Order entered by the Court, including any consent judgment 

order, final judgment order, or a prior dismissal entered by the Court. All such Defendants are 

hereby dismissed without prejudice. 

This terminates the action.

DATED: September 11, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt (Bar No. 6207971)

Keith Vogt, Ltd.

111 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1700

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Telephone: 312-675-6079

E-mail: keith@vogtip.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case: 1:20-cv-03837 Document #: 42 Filed: 09/11/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:6008
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document was electronically filed on September 11, 2020 with the Clerk of the Court using the 

CM/ECF system, which will automatically send an email notification of such filing to all 

registered attorneys of record.

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt

Case: 1:20-cv-03837 Document #: 42 Filed: 09/11/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:6009
#### ROSEN et al. v. UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S OF LONDON.

Civ. A. 12110.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

Nov. 2, 1951.

Horace M. Schell, Jerome Bennett, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Plenry A. Frye, Richard L. Freeman, and Moffett, Stover, Frye & Leopold, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants.

CLARY, District Judge.

The matter is before me on defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint.

The action is based on a policy of insurance issued upon several valuable horses, among which was one known as “Palatine King”, insured for $19,200. The policy was issued for the period July 27, 1949 to July 27, 1950. ' On July 3, 1950, “Palatine King” suffered an injury. Plaintiff alleges that the injury was of such a nature as to require immediate destruction of the animal. The policy provided that no liability should attach in the event of slaughter of the animal unless the slaughter was with the consent of the defendants’ veterinary. Plaintiff alleges in his complaint that the withholding of consent was arbitrary, deliberate and with the sole purpose of prolonging the life of the animal beyond the term of the policy, the said defendants’ veterinary well knowing that the animal could not recover and should be destroyed.

**Accepting as true the facts pleaded in plaintiff’s amended complaint, as I am required to do on a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff has set forth a claim upon which relief can be granted. He has raised the question of fraud on the part of defendants in withholding consent to the destruction of the animal, thereby preventing the happening of the condition necessary for plaintiff’s recovery. See Williston, “Contracts”, Vol. III, Sec. 677, and Restatement, “Contracts”, Sec. 295.

Defendants’ contention that even if consent was withheld arbitrarily, plaintiff could not recover, is untenable.

The motion to dismiss will be denied.
#### VIRGINIA MUT. INS. CO. v. NEWCOMB

No. 210P97

Case below: 125 N.C.App. 617

Petition by defendant (Kimberly Amburn) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 June 1997.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

LOOP SPINE & SPORTS CENTER, LTD., )

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) 20 C 2590

)

LIFESTYLE NUTRITION, INC., )

CHRISTOPHER FUZY, )

and JOHN DOES 1-10, )

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff Loop Spine & Sports Center, Ltd.

voluntarily dismisses its individual claims against defendants Lifestyle Nutrition, Inc. and

Christopher Fuzy with prejudice and without costs. Plaintiff Loop Spine & Sports Center, Ltd.

voluntarily dismisses its class claims against defendants Lifestyle Nutrition, Inc. and Christopher

Fuzy without prejudice and without costs. Plaintiff Loop Spine & Sports Center, Ltd. voluntarily

dismisses its claims against defendants John Does 1-10 without prejudice and without costs. 

Respectfully submitted, 

s/ Heather Kolbus

Heather Kolbus

Daniel A. Edelman

Heather Kolbus

EDELMAN, COMBS, LATTURNER & GOODWIN, LLC

20 S. Clark Street, Suite 1500

Chicago, IL 60603

(312) 739-4200

(312) 419-0379 (FAX)

Case: 1:20-cv-02590 Document #: 14 Filed: 10/14/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:60
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Heather Kolbus, hereby certify that on October 14, 2020, I caused a true and accurate

copy of the foregoing document to be filed with the Court’s CM/ECF system, and to be served by

U.S. Mail upon the following: 

Lifestyle Nutrition, Inc. 

c/o Christopher Fuzy, Registered Agent

1741 Coral Gardens Drive

Wilton Manors, FL 33334

Christopher Fuzy

1741 Coral Gardens Drive

Wilton Manors, FL 33334

s/ Heather Kolbus

Heather Kolbus

Daniel A. Edelman

Heather Kolbus

EDELMAN, COMBS, LATTURNER & GOODWIN, LLC

20 S. Clark Street, Suite 1500

Chicago, IL 60603

(312) 739-4200

(312) 419-0379 (FAX)

Case: 1:20-cv-02590 Document #: 14 Filed: 10/14/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:61
##### 



(i)
    
    the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: March 21, 2006
    
    /s/ ALAN D. GOLDAlan D. Gold
Chief Executive Officer
    (i)
    
    the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: March 21, 2006
    
    /s/ JOHN F. WILSON, IIJohn F. Wilson, II
Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Richard Placko, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03451

Honorable Robert W. Gettleman

University Of Illinois, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Sunday, November 22, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: On plaintiff's Notice

[31] and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) this case is dismiss

without prejudice. Defendants' motions to dismiss [23][29] are denied as moot. Civil case

terminated. Mailed notice (cn).

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03451 Document #: 32 Filed: 11/22/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:302