alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PSCR 700MHz Public Safety Broadband Demonstration Network

Stakeholder Meeting Agenda

Conference Bridge # / Pin

10:30 AM 10:45 AM

Room 1103/1105 1-877-491-0547 / 1373200 Room 1107 1-888-834-9071 / 3867142

Auditorium 1-866-654-0742 / 9864043

12:00 PM 1:00 PM

Auditorium 1-866-654-0742 / 9864043

Auditorium 1-866-654-0742 / 9864043

3:00 PM 3:15 PM

Room 1103/1105 1-877-491-0547 / 1373200 Room 1107 1-888-834-9071 / 3867142

Room 1103/1105 1-877-491-0547 / 1373200 Room 1107 1-888-834-9071 / 3867142

10:45 AM 11:00 AM

Room 1103/1105 1-877-491-0547 / 1373200 Room 1107 1-888-834-9071 / 3867142

12:00 PM 1:00 PM

Room 1103/1105 1-877-491-0547 / 1373200 Room 1107 1-888-834-9071 / 3867142

Auditorium 1-866-654-0742 / 9864043 Lobby

Break

2:45 PM

Track 1 Cooperative Research and 

Development Agreement (CRADA) 

Overview

Track 2 PSCR Lab Tour

3:00 PM 4:00 PM

4:00 PM 4:30 PM

Auditorium 1-866-654-0742 / 9864043

Auditorium

9:30 AM 9:45 AM

9:00 AM 9:30 AM

Day 1 | Tuesday, April 20

1:00 PM 2:00 PM

Day 2 | Wednesday, April 21

11:30 AM 12:00 PM

Break

Track 1 Project Expectations & Issues 

– Public Safety Perspective

Track 2 Project Expectations & Issues 

– Industry Perspective

9:45 AM 10:00 AM

10:00 AM 10:30 AM

10:45 AM 11:30 AM

Overview of PSCR

3:15 PM 5:00 PM

1:15 PM 3:00 PM Demonstration Tests 

Lunch

1:00 PM 1:15 PM

Test Plan Overview – BBTF Recommendations & Demonstration Versus 

Evaluation Tests

Break

Registration & Check-In

Lobby

Opening Remarks

Auditorium 1-866-654-0742 / 9864043

Track 1 Public Safety Roaming, Priority, 

& Pre-emption Requirements

Project Agenda, Overview, & Meeting Logistics

Auditorium 1-866-654-0742 / 9864043

Auditorium 1-866-654-0742 / 9864043

Registration & Check-In

Track 1 Public Safety Voice & Security 

Requirements

Track 2 Technology Evaluation Tests

Project Expectations & Issues – Discussion

Schedule – Equipment Deliveries, Working Groups, Demo Days

Closing Remarks

Lobby

Auditorium 1-866-654-0742 / 9864043

Auditorium 1-866-654-0742 / 9864043

Welcome & Recap Day 1

Network Planning & Design Overview – Boulder & Washington DC

Track 1 Public Safety Requirements

9:45 AM

9:45 AM 10:45 AM

2:45 PM

Lunch

Track 1 Standards Work Overview & 

SDO Participation (ATIS & 3GPP)

Track 2 Device Requirements & BC14 

Requirements

Track 2 Network Architecture, Link 

Budget, & Roaming 

Break

Track 2 Priority, Pre-emption, & QoS

3:00 PM

11:00 AM 12:00 PM

2:00 PM

1-866-654-0742 / 9864043

8:45 AM 9:00 AM

9:00 AM 9:15 AM

9:15 AM
#### Abdul Aziz KHAN; Hina Parveen; Abdul Majeed Khan; Muhammad Fareed Khan; Nida Perveen; Zahida Perveen, Petitioners, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent.

No. 04-1593.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 19, 2004.

Decided Dec. 29, 2004.

*303John E. Gallagher, Catonsville, Maryland, for Petitioners. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, James A. Hunolt, Senior Litigation Counsel, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Abdul Aziz Khan (“Khan”) and his wife, Zahida Perveen, and their four children, Nida and Hina Perveen and Abdul Majeed and Muhammad Fareed Khan, natives and citizens of Pakistan, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) order affirming, without opinion, the immigration judge’s decision denying asylum and withholding of removal and denying relief under the Convention Against Torture. For the reasons discussed below, we deny the petition for review.*

The decision to grant or deny asylum relief is conclusive “unless manifestly contrary to the law and an abuse of discretion.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(D) (2000). We have reviewed the immigration judge’s decision and the administrative record and find the record supports the conclusion Khan failed to establish past persecution or a well founded fear of persecution. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(a) (2004) (stating that the burden of proof is on the alien to establish his eligibility for asylum); *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 483, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). Because the decision in this case is not manifestly contrary to law, we cannot grant the relief Khan and his family seek.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*

*

 The Petitioners do not challenge the immigration judge’s denial of the applications for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel are you 

a Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this &ourt an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this &ourt’s

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 8.6.&§1746, this

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

Anthony Mays v. City of

Chicago, et al.

20 CV 3228

Defendants Jones, Leano, Nichols, Smith Jr.

Anthony E. Zecchin

Hale & Monico LLC

53 W Jackson Blvd., Suite 337

Chicago, IL 60604

6257706 312-341-9646

azecchin@halemonico.com

08/27/2020

✔

✔

✔

✔

Anthony E. Zecchin

Case: 1:20-cv-03228 Document #: 25 Filed: 08/27/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:69
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 42

Designating minority membership to certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 6, 1997

Mr. BOSWELL submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating minority membership to certain standing

committees of the House.

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and that

he is hereby, elected to the following standing committee of

the House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE: Mr. Brown of California.

In lieu of the Members elected in H. Res. 36 to the following committees, the following Members:

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Mr. LaFalce, Mr.

Skelton, Mr. Sisisky, Mr. Flake, Mr. Poshard, Ms. Velazquez,

Mr. Luther, Mr. Baldacci, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, Ms.

Millender-McDonald, Mr. Weygand, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr.
2

HRES 42 ATH

Boyd, Ms. McCarthy of New York, Mr. Pascrell, and Mr.

Goode.

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS: Mr. Evans, Mr.

Kennedy of Massachusetts, Mr. Filner, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr.

Bishop, Mr. Clyburn, Ms. Brown of Florida, Mr. Doyle, Mr.

Mascara, Mr. Peterson of Minnesota, Mrs. Carson, Mr.

Reyes, and Mr. Snyder.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 334 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 334

    Directing the Secretary of the Treasury to produce all factual 
  information pertaining to the actions taken by the Secretary of the 
Treasury and the United States Executive Directors at the international 
 financial institutions to comply with the requirements of 1621 of the 
International Financial Institutions Act, relating to encouragement of 
                         fair labor practices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 1997

 Mr. Sanders submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Banking and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Directing the Secretary of the Treasury to produce all factual 
  information pertaining to the actions taken by the Secretary of the 
Treasury and the United States Executive Directors at the international 
 financial institutions to comply with the requirements of 1621 of the 
International Financial Institutions Act, relating to encouragement of 
                         fair labor practices.

    Resolved, That the Secretary of the Treasury is directed to produce 
all factual information pertaining to the actions taken by the 
Secretary of the Treasury and the United States Executive Directors at 
the international financial institutions (as defined in section 
1701(c)(2) of the International Financial Institutions Act) to comply 
with the requirements of 1621 of such Act (22 U.S.C. 262p-4p), as added 
by section 526(e) of Public Law 103-306 (108 Stat. 1633).
                                 <all>
```
--

Dear Amy and colleagues

The Uruguayan government has adopted, in 2016, the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, although it was

adapted to the context, the core remains the same. With this we carry out periodic audits and from them

have arisen needs and comments that we detail below.

Recommendations and comments for the NIST CSF update or use:

● Cloud: The use of the cloud and the specific risks that its use implies are not explicitly addressed.

Although they can be considered in existing subcategories, it could be a topic to be dealt with

specifically. For example, making use of the new ISO/IEC 27002 standard and/or the NIST

standards for the use the cloud.

● Self-assessment: In the experience of using the framework, one of the questions that arises

most frequently is “where do I start?”. For this we have generated various strategies; One of them

is the use of the cybersecurity assessment tool developed by IDB (https://www.iadb-tools.org/

[gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]). We are currently coordinating efforts with the bank to

adapt the tool to various sectors. This tool allows, based on high-level questions, to determine a

cybersecurity maturity and initial recommendations, allowing the user to develop an action plan.

Perhaps NIST can contribute to it.

I hope our comments are useful to you.

Best regards

Ing. Fabiana Santellán

Gerente de gestión y auditoría

Seguridad de la Información, AGESIC

Torre Ejecutiva Sur

Liniers 1324 - Piso 3

(11.000) Montevideo – URUGUAY
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cavalry Bancorp, Inc., (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ed C. Loughry,
Jr., Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 
 Date:
      May 5, 2005
    by:Ed
      C. Loughry, Jr.Chairman
      of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive
Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

D.C., a child

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 14

- 2213

[ May 20, 2015 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael J. Orlando , Judge; L.T. Case No.

14000924DL00A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Catherine Linton, Assistant Attorney Gener al, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

. See S.D. v. State , 882 So. 2d 447 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2004).

W ARNER
, G ROSS and C ONNER

, JJ., concur

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 10.49



 Exhibit 10.49 
  
 [CISCO SYSTEMS LOGO APPEARS HERE] 
  
 170 West Tasman Drive 
 San Jose, California
95134 
  
 May 17, 2004 
  
  
 IRREVOCABLE WAIVER 
  
 The undersigned, Cisco
Systems, Inc., a California corporation (the “Investor”), possesses certain rights under that certain Investor Rights Agreement dated January 31, 2000 (the “Investor Rights
Agreement”) and that certain Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of December 29, 1999 (the “Purchase Agreement”), each among the Investor, BearingPoint, Inc., a Delaware corporation (f.k.a.
KPMG Consulting, Inc. and referred to herein as the “Company”), and KPMG LLP, a registered Delaware limited liability partnership (“KPMG”). These rights are summarized as
follows: 
  
 1.        Investor Rights Agreement.    The Investor Rights Agreement provides the Investor with certain registration rights (all rights under Article 1 thereof and the
relevant provisions of Article 6 thereof are referred to as the “Registration Rights”), rights of first offer and first negotiation, other rights arising out of covenants made by the Company, rights to nominate
one or more persons to the Company’s Board of Directors and arising out of voting agreements made by the Company and KPMG, rights of first refusal and co-sale and other rights as provided therein. 
  
 2.        Purchase Agreement.    Pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Purchase Agreement, KPMG and the Company have made certain restrictive covenants in favor of the Investor
regarding entering into any agreement providing for a business combination with specified companies (such rights, the “Exclusive Rights”). 
  
 By execution of this letter and effective as of May 17, 2004, the Investor hereby irrevocably waives (1) with respect to the
Investor Rights Agreement, all rights thereunder and the Investor’s rights to enforce all covenants made by the other parties thereto in favor of the Investor thereunder, other than the Registration Rights which shall remain in
full force and effect, and (2) the Exclusive Rights under Section 4.10 of the Purchase Agreement (and the Investor’s rights to enforce all covenants made by the other parties thereto in favor of the Investor under Section 4.10 thereunder). This
Waiver shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the Company and KPMG and their respective successors and assigns. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of California without regard to its choice
of law provisions. 
  
 Sincerely, 
  
 CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 
  
 /s/ Dennis D. Powell 
 Dennis D. Powell 
 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 198 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 29, 1997.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2266) making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 1998, and for other purposes. The first reading 
of the bill shall be dispensed with. Points of order against consideration of 
the bill for failure to comply with clause 2(l)(6) of rule XI, clause 7 of rule 
XXI, or section 306 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 are waived. General 
debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be considered 
for amendment under the five-minute rule. Points of order against provisions in 
the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 or 6 of rule XXI are waived. During 
consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the 
Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member 
offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of the 
Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII. 
Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman of the Committee 
of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the 
Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) 
reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed 
question that follows another electronic vote without intervening business, 
provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on the first in any series 
of questions shall be fifteen minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the 
bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House 
with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
STATE OF ALASKA HOUSE DISTRICT 1
SAMPLE BALLOT 2-1

PRIMARY ELECTION - AUGUST 22, 2000

INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTER: To vote for the candidate of your choice, fill in the oval to the right
of the name of the candidate for whom you want to vote. Place your ballot inside the secrecy
sleeve, take your ballot to the ballot box.

lf you make a mistake while voting, return the ballot to the election official for a new one. A vote
which has been erased or changed will not be counted.

STATE OF ALASKA
OFFICIAL OPEN BALLOT

PRIMARY ELECTION
AUGUST 22, 2000

Completely fill in the oval opposite the name of each candidate for whom you wish to vote. @®

UNITED STATES
REPRESENTATIVE
(vote for one)
GREENE, CLIFFORD MARK Democrat —_
(Signed Term Limits Pledge: Will serve no more than 3 terms)
DORE, JIM Alaskan Independence ©_
MILES, DAE Democrat ©
(Signed Term Limits Pledge: Will serve no more than 3 terms)
KARPINSKI, LEONARD J. "LEN" Libertarian ©
(Signed Term Limits Pledge: Will serve no more than 3 terms)
YOUNG, ANNA C. Green (_
(Signed Term Limits Pledge: Will serve no more than 3 terms)
VONDERSAAR, FRANK Democrat ©
J
STATE SENATE
DISTRICT A
(vote for one)
MIDDAG, GREG Democrat © >
(Signed Term Limits Pledge: Will serve no more than 8 years)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: David Mayberry v. Ronald 

Watts, et al. 

Case Number: 20 CV 2926 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for: 

City of Chicago, Philip Cline, Debra Kirby and Karen Rowan 

Attorney name (type or print): Daniel M. Noland 

Firm: Reiter Burns LLP 

Street address: 311 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 5200 

City/State/Zip: Chicago, IL 60606 

Bar ID Number: 6231175 

(See item 3 in instructions) 

Telephone Number: 312 982-0090 

 

Email Address: dnoland@reiterburns.com 

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case? Yes No 

Are you acting as local counsel in this case? Yes No 

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar? Yes No 

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? Yes No 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel 

 Appointed Counsel 

 If appointed counsel, are you a 

 

 Federal Defender 

 CJA Panel Attorney 

______________________________________________________________________ 

In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this Court’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 U.S.C.§1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath. 

Executed on June 26, 2020 

Attorney signature: S/ Daniel M. Noland 

 (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.) 

 Revised 8/1/2015 

Case: 1:20-cv-02926 Document #: 23 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:68
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.6.3

Eastern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cr−00318

Honorable Robert W. Gettleman

Olalekan Jacob Ponle

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, August 19, 2022:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman as to Olalekan Jacob

Ponle: Telephonic hearing held on 8/19/2022. Defendant appeared on the hearing

telephonically. The parties updated the court on the status of the case. Telephonic hearing

set for 10/14/2022 at 9:30 a.m. Members of the public and media may listen to these

proceedings by dialing (888) 684−8852 and using the access code is 1503395. Counsel of

record and other essential case participants will receive an email prior to the start of the

telephone hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to

proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and

rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in

sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future

hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by

the Court. By agreement, the Court deems the period of time from 8/19/2022 to

10/14/2022 excludable under 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) − interest of justice. Mailed

notice (cn).

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cr-00318 Document #: 60 Filed: 08/19/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:202
Case: 1:20-cv-03191 Document #: 8 Filed: 06/10/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:103