alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NOTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

Demetrius Johnson,

Plaintiff,

v.

Reynaldo Guevara, et al.,

Defendant.

No. 1:20-cv-04156

Hon. Sara L. Ellis,

District Judge

Hon. Heather K. McShain,

Magistrate Judge

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER REGARDING EXPERT DISCOVERY AND DEFENDANTS’ 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE

On this day came on to be heard the Parties’ Proposed Order for an Expert Discovery and 

Summary Judgment Briefing Schedule. The Court finds that should be, and is, GRANTED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Parties’ 

Proposal for Expert Discovery and Summary Judgment Briefing is GRANTED. The Court enters 

the following schedule:

• Plaintiff’s expert disclosures: March 1, 2023

• Defendants to complete Plaintiff’s expert depositions: May 1, 2023

• Defendants’ expert disclosures: June 1, 2023

• Plaintiff to complete Defendants’ expert depositions: July 26, 2023

• Defendants’ motion for summary judgment: August 28, 2023

• Plaintiff’s response to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment: September 29, 2023

• Defendants’ reply for their motion for summary judgment: October 13, 2023

Dated: __January 26, 2023

_____________________________

Judge Sara L. Ellis

United States District Court 

Northern District of Illinois

Case: 1:20-cv-04156 Document #: 204 Filed: 01/26/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:3509
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 39

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to afford witnesses

greater freedom to provide information to House committees by eliminating current administrative requirements.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 5, 1997

Mr. SKAGGS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to

afford witnesses greater freedom to provide information

to House committees by eliminating current administrative requirements.

1 Resolved, That the second sentence of clause 2(g)(4)

2 of rule XI of the Rules of the House of Representatives

3 is repealed.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 66705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26616]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD


Extension of Hearing Record Closure Date

AGENCY: Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.

ACTION: Extension of hearing record closure date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) published 
a document in the Federal Register on September 25, 2014, (79 FR 57543) 
concerning notice of a public hearing and meeting on October 7, 2014, 
regarding safety culture at Department of Energy defense nuclear 
facilities. The Board stated in that notice that the hearing record 
would remain open until November 7, 2014, for the receipt of additional 
materials. The Board made the same representation at the conclusion of 
the hearing on October 7, 2014.

DATES: The Board now extends the period of time for which the hearing 
record will remain open to November 21, 2014, to accommodate the 
submission of additional documents to the hearing record.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Welch, General Manager, Defense 
Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue NW., Suite 700, 
Washington, DC 20004-2901, (800) 788-4016. This is a toll-free number.

    Dated: November 4, 2014.
Peter S. Winokur,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 2014-26616 Filed 11-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3670-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

WHAM-O HOLDING, LTD. and 

INTERSPORT CORP. d/b/a WHAM-O,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”,

Defendants.

Civil Action No.: 1:20-cv-03761

Judge Manish S. Shah

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey T. Gilbert

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby files this Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal, without prejudice, as to the following Defendant(s) identified on Schedule A of the 

Complaint:

NO. DEFENDANT

163 Aley's fast shop

164 ALONG 's Shop666

189 missxu

191 New YE

193 pwrimo chharles company

210 Xshirley

261 Dreamwork Co., Ltd.

320 Lingery

246 Cenglings

437 Angler & Cyclist's Store

445 Camtoa Outdoor Store

428 A Outdoor Store

436 All-inclusive Outdoor Store

459 Fantabulous Store

555 Wonder Outdoor Store

563 Zindy's Store

388 Viedoct

369 smiela

282 gonikm

336 Moggem Store

Case: 1:20-cv-03761 Document #: 55 Filed: 10/05/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:7886
493 Lokie's Store

559 Yunhua Shen's store

187 Lovelyhouse520

176 Fashionpark365

215 zxmaz

199 song yan shop

221 ❤️Ywoow❤️

408 YOU^NEN

409 Youen Direct

45 coolcargo68

386 Vansee❤️❤️ hot sale !!!

377 TADAMI

300 Jiayit

255 Dainzuy

DATED: October 5, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt (Bar No. 6207971)

Keith Vogt, Ltd.

111 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1700

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Telephone: 312-675-6079

E-mail: keith@vogtip.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case: 1:20-cv-03761 Document #: 55 Filed: 10/05/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:7887
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document was electronically filed on October 5, 2020 with the Clerk of the Court using the 

CM/ECF system, which will automatically send an email notification of such filing to all registered 

attorneys of record.

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt

Case: 1:20-cv-03761 Document #: 55 Filed: 10/05/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:7888
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7189

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CURTIS LAMAR SMITH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-91-200-S, CA-96-131-4)

Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: February 4, 1997

Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Lamar Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.

104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Smith, Nos. CR91-200-S; CA-96-131-4 (M.D.N.C. July 23, 1996). We deny as moot

Appellant's motion to hold the case in abeyance for United States

v. Stroman, No. 96-6054 (4th Cir., July 30, 1996) (unpublished). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brandon M. HOLLYWOOD, also known as Swap, also known as Earl, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-10277.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Nov. 5, 2004.

*906Michael Gill, Dallas, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Francisco Hernandez, Jr., Francisco Hernandez Law Firm, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Brandon M. Hollywood appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for aiding and abetting the distribution of and distributing less than five grams of crack cocaine in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).

Hollywood contends that the district court erred when it denied his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. “[A] district court may, in its discretion, permit withdrawal [of a guilty plea] before sentencing if the defendant can show a ‘fair and just reason.’ ” *United States v. Powell,*354 F.3d 362, 370 (5th Cir.2003) (citing Fed. R.Crim.P. 11(d)(2)); *see also United States v. Carr,*740 F.2d 339, 343-44 (5th Cir. 1984). The district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Hollywood’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea. *See Powell,*354 F.3d at 370.

Further, Hollywood contends that the district court erred in determining the quantity of drugs attributable to him as relevant conduct. He also contends that the district court erred when it increased his base offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(b)(l) for possession of a weapon in connection with a drug-trafficking offense. Hollywood’s sentence was not determined based on the drug quantity calculation or the two-level increase pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(b)(l). Instead, Hollywood’s sentence was determined based on his status as a career offender pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. Therefore, these arguments are irrelevant.

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"52179773875_6ed0bab2c3_o","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"eqetzcwYX5\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/52179773875_6ed0bab2c3_o\/\">52179773875_6ed0bab2c3_o<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/52179773875_6ed0bab2c3_o\/embed\/#?secret=eqetzcwYX5\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“52179773875_6ed0bab2c3_o” — NASA\" data-secret=\"eqetzcwYX5\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/52179773875_6ed0bab2c3_o.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":800}
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 507

Providing special investigative authority for the Committee on Education

and the Workforce.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 21, 1998

Mr. GOODLING (for himself, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. HILLEARY,

Mr. BALLENGER, Mr. BOB SCHAFFER of Colorado, and Mr. PARKER)

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on Rules

RESOLUTION

Providing special investigative authority for the Committee

on Education and the Workforce.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. APPLICATION.

3 This resolution shall apply to the investigation by the

4 Committee on Education and the Workforce into the ad5 ministration of labor laws by Government agencies, includ6 ing the Departments of Labor and Justice, concerning the

7 International Brotherhood of the Teamsters, and other re8 lated matters.
2

•HRES 507 IH

1 SEC. 2. HANDLING OF INFORMATION.

2 Information obtained under the authority of this res3 olution shall be—

4 (1) considered as taken in the District of Co5 lumbia as well as at the location actually taken; and

6 (2) considered as taken in executive session by

7 the subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of

8 the Committee on Education and the Workforce.

9 SEC. 3. DISPOSITION AND INTERROGATORIES.

10 The Chairman of the Committee on Education and

11 the Workforce, after consultation with the ranking minor12 ity member of the committee, may—

13 (1) order the taking of depositions or interrog14 atories anywhere within the United States, under

15 oath and pursuant to notice or subpoena; and

16 (2) designate a member, staff, or contractor of

17 the committee to conduct any such proceeding.

Æ
Stay GRANTED and Order filed April 2 , 2019

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00274

- CV

____________ IN RE PREVENTATIVE P EST CONTROL HOUSTON, LLC AND NICHOLAS ANTHONY CHA RLES , Relator s

O RIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 295th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016

- 01076



### ORDER

On April 1, 2019, relator s Preventative Pest Control Houston, LLC and Nicholas Anthony Charles filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court.
Relator s ask this court to order the Honorable Donna Roth, Judge of the 295th District Court, in Harris County, Texas, to set aside h er February 25, 2019 and March25, 2019 orders entered in trial court number 2016

- 01076, styled Karen Ackermann v. Preventative Pest Control, LLC. and Nicholas Charles Anthony , compelling relators to produce non

- existent lists of information as part of pre trial discovery.

Relator s a lso have filed a motion asking this court for temporary stay of proceedings in the trial court below. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b), 52.10. Relators
seek a stay of proceedings in the trial court pending a decision on the petitio n for
writ of mandamus.
It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that relators ’ request for relief requires further consideration and that relator s will be prejudiced unless immediate temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relators ’ request for a stay and issue the following order:

We ORDER all proceedings in trial court cause number 2016

- 01076 , Karen Ackermann v. Preventative Pest Control, LLC. and Nicholas Charles Anthony
, STAYED until a final decision by this court on rel ators ’ petition for writ of mandamus, or until further order of this court.
In addition, the court requests real party in interest Karen Ackermann to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before April 17, 2019

. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.4.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Bourliot.
Exhibit 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report of Spreadtrum Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Leo Li, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complied with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 7, 2010



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Leo Li                           
|Leo Li                               
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|Spreadtrum Communications, Inc.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Section 906Certification**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR**

**PRINCIPALFINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with theaccompanying Form 10-Q of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc. for the six monthsended June 30, 2005, I, Donald J. Berchtold, Chief Executive Officer ofFog Cutter Capital Group Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) such Form 10-Qfor the six months ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the informationcontained in such Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2005 fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc.

 

This written statement isbeing furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to suchForm 10-Q.

 
| August 12, 2005 |                    | /s/ Donald J. Berchtold |   |
|----------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| Date                 | Donald J. Berchtold     |
|                 | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,987,724
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,670,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  3,629,580
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     46,271,022
<ALLOWANCE>                                    576,792
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,869,510
<DEPOSITS>                                  50,820,784
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            679,843
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       512,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,856,883
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              56,869,510
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,163,662
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              137,410
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               146,657
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             3,447,729
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,520,491
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,520,491
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,927,238
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  213,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,055,615
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                889,879
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     591,721
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   591,721
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.16
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     5.1
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                    29,824
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               481,035
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  124,234
<RECOVERIES>                                     6,991
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              576,792
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           576,792
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00501-CV

IN RE David GOAD

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 13, 2014

MOTION DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On July 18, 2014, David Goad filed a pro se motion seeking an emergency stay of 

proceedings pending in Justice Court No. 2, Guadalupe County, Texas, pursuant to Rule 52.10 of 

the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Although the motion recites that a petition for writ of 

mandamus, writ of injunction or writ of prohibition would be filed by relator, Goad has not filed 

a petition.2 Rule 52.10 allows a relator to seek temporary relief “pending the court’s action” on a 

petition. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10. Implicit in Rule 52.10 is the necessity for a petition to be filed 

before this court can consider any grant of temporary relief. See id. At this time, there is no 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. JSC2-1000, styled David Goad v. George R. Wyatt, pending in the Justice 

Court, Precinct Two, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable Sheryl Sachtleben presiding. 2 It should be noted that this court does not have authority to issue a writ against a justice of the peace. See TEX. GOV’T 

CODE ANN. § 22.221(a)-(b) (West 2004); see also In re Barrera, No. 04-14-00464-CV, 2014 WL 3014696, at *1 (Tex. 

App.—San Antonio July 2, 2014, orig. proceeding) (dismissing petition seeking mandamus relief against justice of 

the peace for lack of jurisdiction).

 
04-14-00501-CV

controversy before this court. Accordingly, Goad’s motion for emergency stay is dismissed for 

lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

- 2 -
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**Certification of Principal Accounting Officer Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

** **

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Rotoblock Corporation (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard Di Stefano, Principal Accounting Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge andbelief:

(1) the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Registrant.

Date: July 20, 2011

ROTOBLOCK CORPORATION

/s/ Richard Di Stefano

By: Richard Di Stefano, Chief Financial Officer/Principal Accounting Officer