alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


        STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                            UNDER 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350




         We, Charles E. Ramey, the chief executive officer US Dataworks, Inc.
(the "Company"), and John S. Reiland, the chief financial officer of the
Company, certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of
the United States Code that, to the best of our knowledge,

         (i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB, for the period
ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

         (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: February 17, 2004

                                                  /s/ Charles E. Ramey
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Charles E. Ramey
                                                  Chief Executive Officer


                                                  /s/ John S. Reiland
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  John S. Reiland
                                                  Chief Financial Officer




A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO US DATAWORKS, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY US DATAWORKS, INC. AND
FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pliant Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian E. Johnson,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ Brian E. Johnson

Brian E. Johnson
Chief Financial Officer
August 6, 2002
United States Department of Commerce

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Certificate of Metrological Traceability For:

Alabama

This laboratory has demonstrated evidence of an unbroken chain of metrological traceability of its standards to the international system of units (SI), documented measurement uncertainties, uses documented measurement procedures, successfully 

completed training and proficiency tests, documented calibration intervals, submitted a quality management system, and 

demonstrated suitable measurement assurance for the Scope listed on this certificate.

The Office of Weights and Measures Program assesses laboratories to NIST Handbook 143 - Program Handbook for State 

Weights and Measures Laboratories and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. 

Scope

(Rev.: September 2021)

Mass Echelon III

25 kg to 1 mg

1000 lb to 0.001 lb

8 oz to 0.03125 oz

Volume Transfer, II

5 gal

Field Calibrations

1500 gal to 25 gal

2023

____________________________________

Katrice Lippa, Chief

NIST Office of Weights and Measures

Effective Dates: 2023-02-01 to 2024-02-01
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

United States of America, )

)

Plaintiff, ) Case No: 20 CR 368

) 

v. )

) Judge John F. Kness

)

Commonwealth Edison, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Telephonic arraignment held on August 5, 2020. As reflected on the record, all parties 

consented to appearing by telephone under Section 15002(b)(1) of the CARES Act. Defendant 

acknowledged receipt and waived formal reading of the Information. Defendant further 

confirmed the written waiver (see Dkt. 3 at p. 1) of his right to prosecution by indictment and 

consented to proceeding under the Information. Consistent with Rule 10(a)(3) of the Federal 

Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Court asked Defendant to plead to the Information. In response 

to the Court’s inquiry, Defendant entered a plea of not guilty. A status hearing is set for July 17, 

2023 at 10:00 a.m. For the reasons stated on the record, the Court excludes time through July 17, 

2023 under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(2).

(T: 0:35 min)

Date: 8/5/2020 /s/ John F. Kness___________________________

 John F. Kness

United States District Judge

Case: 1:20-cr-00368 Document #: 13 Filed: 08/05/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:163
Open Flow Cytometry Standards Consortium Meeting

11/18/21

Thursday, 11 AM – 1PM EST

https://nist-secure.webex.com/nist-secure/j.php?MTID=m54eed7e0e7a45490b1cef2f5ea43af83

The purpose of this workshop is to learn about the state-of-the-art in flow cytometry 

data analysis tools and procedures, identify pressing gaps and challenges, as well as 

opportunities for collaborative solutions. 

The expected outcome of the workshop is a Workshop Summary that defines the work of 

the Consortium.

About the Flow Cytometry Standards Consortium:

NIST recently launched the Flow Cytometry Standards Consortium to accelerate the 

adoption of quantitative flow cytometry in biomanufacturing of cell and gene therapies. 

The Consortium has two active Working Groups working on 1. instrument 

standardization via Equivalent Number of Reference Fluorophores (ERF) beads, and 2.

assay standardization to enable more comparable and quantitative assays commonly 

used for cell and gene therapy characterization and release. NIST is working to establish 

Working Group 3 focused on data analysis. 

Meeting Objectives:

 Provide an overview of the NIST Flow Cytometry Standards Consortium’s work to date 

and future

 Have multiple companies outline their data analysis software’s unique capabilities

 Discuss other data analysis considerations 

Agenda:

1. NIST consortium working groups and interlaboratory studies overview and goals (15

minutes) 

2. Company presentations:

a. Enabling biomarker data science in the cloud - Daniel Crichton, JPL (10 minutes)

b. Standardization and interoperability aspects of BD cytometry software - Josef 

Spidlen, BD Life Sciences (10 minutes)

c. Making Machine Learning-assisted Data Analysis Accessible on the Cytobank 

Platform – Giulia Grazia, Beckman Colter Life Sciences (10 minutes)

d. Utilizing FCS express to standardize cytometry analysis protocols and 

consolidation of reporting results - Sean Burke, De Novo Software (10 minutes)
e. Automation-Assisted Flow Cytometry Analysis with TASBE Flow Analytics - Jake 

Beal, Raytheon BBN (10 minutes)

3. The roles of uncertainty quantification in cytometry - Paul Patrone, ITL/NIST (10

minutes)

4. Advancement in bioanalytical techniques to improve cell therapy product quantification

- Heba Degheidy, CBER/FDA (10 minutes)

5. ISAC Perspectives on Cytometry Data Reporting and Transparent Analysis – Jonathan 

M. Irish (10 minutes)

6. Discussion (20 minutes) 

7. Summary and next steps (5 minutes)
EXHIBIT 12.3
------------

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
------------------------------------------------

I, Inger M. Klemp, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Ship Finance International
Limited;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
          covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.


Date: June 27, 2006

  /s/ Inger M. Klemp
--------------------------
Inger M. Klemp
Principal Financial Officer

SK 23153 0001 681182
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation.

# ACTION:

Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation of 1978, Public Law 95-541.

# SUMMARY:

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. This is the required notice.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Li Ling Hamady, ACA Permit Officer, Division of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Or by email:                         *ACApermits@nsf.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On April 25, 2014 the National Science Foundation published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     of a permit application received. The permit was issued on November 7, 2014 to:                

## Permit No. 2015-001

Dr. Robert Pitman

Nadene G. Kennedy,

Polar Coordination Specialist, Division of Polar Programs.

[FR Doc. 2014-27088 Filed 11-14-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
H. Res. 208

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 31, 1997.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and

that they are hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES:

Mr. Weygand.

COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL SECURITY: Ms. McKinney.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32



                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Perfisans Networks, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Bok Wong, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         o   the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Perfisans Holdings, Inc.
             (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2007, fully complies
             with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
             Exchange Act of 1934; and

         o   the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in
             all material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.



Date: May 21, 2007


                                      /s/ Bok Wong
                                      ------------------------------------
                                      Bok Wong
                                      Chief Executive Officer & Principal
                                      Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 35.1




ANNUAL MASTER SERVICER’S CERTIFICATE




GE DEALER FLOORPLAN MASTER NOTE TRUST




March 28, 2011




The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of General Electric Capital Corporation (“GECC”), as the master servicer (the “Master Servicer”), pursuant to the Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement dated as of June 30, 2006 (as may be further amended and supplemented from time to time, the “Agreement”), between GECC and GE Dealer Floorplan Master Note Trust (“Trust”), does hereby certify that:




1.           GECC is, as of the date hereof, Master Servicer under the Agreement.





2.           The undersigned is an authorized officer who is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this certificate to the Trust.





3.           A review of the activities of Master Servicer during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the “reporting period”), and of its performance under the Agreement, has been made under my supervision.





4.           To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate the date first above written.








/s/ Thomas A. DavidsonName:
Thomas A. DavidsonTitle:
Authorized Signatory of General Electric Capital Corporation
<Page>


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective Amendment
No. 9 to Registration Statement No. 333-43886 of Variable Account D of Union
Security Insurance Company (formerly Fortis Benefits Insurance Company), on
Form N-4, of our report dated February 24, 2005, relating to the statements
of assets and liabilities of Variable Account D as of December 31, 2004, and
the related statements of operations for the year then ended and the
statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period
ended December 31, 2004, appearing in the Statement of Additional
Information, which is incorporated by reference in such Registration
Statement, and to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such
Statement of Additional Information.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
November 8, 2005
Case: 1:20-cr-00331 Document #: 161 Filed: 10/13/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:534
FBICriminal Justice

Information Services

Tom Hopperthopper@leo.gov

Gaithersburg, MDApril, 2005

CJIS

IAFIS

• 47 Million Criminal Records– “Owned” by the contributors– APB Governance Process

• 60K Identification Requests per Day– Half Criminal– Half Civil

• CJIS WAN to States & Federal Agencies• 70K Customers

Success Story

• Skerdi Zena

• Arrested February 22, 2005 in Frasier, Michigan for shoplifting

• Identified as WANTED for Homicide in Canada since January 2004

• IAFIS Response:            18 minutes

• Name used at time of arrest: Boja Fatmir

Electronic Submission

• Electronic Submission Rate by States / Territories– 21 states, 2 terr. - 90.0-99.9 %– 14, D.C. – 61.0-89.9 %– 7 – 30.0-60.9 %– 5 – 0.1 – 29.9 %– 3 states, 3 terr. – 0.0 % 41

.4

56.6 64

.5 72.8

80 82

0102030405060708090

Perc

ent

FY 0

0

FY 0

1

FY 0

2

FY 0

3

FY 0

4

FY 0

5

Electronic Submission Rate by FY

Ten Print Services Statistics

• Promised Response:– Criminal

• 95% within Two hour for of electronic submissions.

– Civil • 95% within 24 hours for 

civil electronic submissions.  

• March 2005– Criminal

• 25 minutes average• 97.2% within two hours

– Civil • 2 hours 47 minutes 

average• 99.9% within 24 hours

Ten Print Services Statistics

• IAFIS Design Workload– 62,500 per day

• Average Closeout March 2005:

– 61,636 per day• Criminal closeout

– 30,516 per day• Civil closeout

– 31,120 per day

• Peak Workday– 85,476 on 4/6/05

Latent Searches

• Promised Response:– Latent searches 

• 24 hour average • 99% within 48 hours

• March 2005– Laboratory Division

• Average 1,064 searches per day

• Average response time:    3 hours 3 minutes 

• 100% within 48 hours

– Remote Searches• Average 206 per day• Average response time:    

3 hours 33 minutes • 100% within 48 hours

Interstate Photo System

• Photograph’s taken during the arrest or booking process

• There can be more than one photograph per arrest

• Interstate Photo System on file as of April 1, 2005:  1,495,323

• FNU’s on file as of April 1, 2005:  988,426

New  Services

• TPRS (Ten Print Rap Sheet) – Rapid Response (< 10 min) for U.S. DHS and Boarder Patrol.

• DOS (Department of State) Flats – Pilot Projects

• Flats Civil Check Service(Summer ’05)

DOS Pilot ProgramsDOS Pilot Programs

Mexico City 10 rolled plus flats May  2003 ~22 months8,435

Cuidad Juarez 10 rolled plus flats November 2003 ~17 months3,100

Guadalajara 10 flats April 2004 ~12 months2,224

Monterrey 10 flats September 2004 ~7 months 906

El Salvador 10 flats and 2 flats November 2004 ~5 months90*

*Count includes both 10 flat and 2 flat submissions

ExtractsExtracts

• FBI data extracts are provided to the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Department of State (DOS) for homeland security purposes– Select KST records – to DHS– FBI Unsolved Latent File records – to DHS– Wanted subjects with foreign or unknown 

POBs, non-US citizens or previous immigration violations – to DHS and DOS

- CJIS
- IAFIS
- Success Story
- Electronic Submission
- Ten Print Services Statistics
- Ten Print Services Statistics
- Latent Searches
- Interstate Photo System
- New  Services
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Michelle Lantow, Chief
Financial Officer, in connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of McCormick & Schmicks Seafood Restaurants, Inc. for the annual period ended December 26, 2009 (the Report), hereby certify in accordance
with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of McCormick & Schmicks Seafood Restaurants, Inc.



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ MICHELLE M. LANTOW                                         
|Michelle M. Lantow Chief
Financial Officer Dated: March 8, 2010
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

Joshua Hutton,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Thomas Ray Barnes, Jr., and The City of 

Chicago,

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2020-CV-03997

NOTICE OF REMOVAL

Defendant City of Chicago, by its attorney, Mark A. Flessner, Corporation Counsel of the 

City of Chicago, respectfully requests removal of the above entitled action to this Court, pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. §1441(a) and §1446 (a), based on the following grounds:

1. Defendant City of Chicago was named as defendant in a civil action filed in the 

Circuit Court of Cook County of the State of Illinois, case number 2018L012549, entitled Joshua

Hutton v. Thomas Ray Barnes, Jr and the City of Chicago with Defendant Thomas Ray Barnes, 

Jr.

2. The Second Amended Complaint was filed on June 15, 2020 and the Second 

Amended Complaint was served upon the City of Chicago on June 15, 2020. Thomas Ray 

Barnes, Jr. has been served and will not object to this removal. See Second Amended Complaint 

attached hereto as Exhibit A.

3. Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Illinois common law. In 

Counts V and VI, Plaintiff alleges that the Plaintiff was subject to Excessive Force and has 

suffered from the City of Chicago’s deliberate indifference to the constitutional rights of refuse 

and/or decline to adequately investigate, discipline, charge, report, and/or arrest

Case: 1:20-cv-03997 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/08/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:1
fellow officers in violation of the Fourth Amendment of The United States Constitution. The 

remaining counts make allegations under Illinois law that Plaintiff was battered and assaulted by 

Thomas Ray Barnes, Jr.

4. Based on the allegations of the complaint and for reasons set forth above, Defendant is

entitled to remove this action to this court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1441(a).

5. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1446(a), Defendant City of Chicago, submits all process, 

pleadings and orders served upon them in Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, case number 

2018L01249. See Exhibit B (Process & Pleadings) and Exhibit C (Orders).

WHEREFORE, Defendant City of Chicago respectfully requests that the above-entitled 

action now pending in the Circuit Court of Cook County in the State of Illinois, case number 

2018L012549, be removed therefrom to this Court.

Respectfully submitted,

City of Chicago

Mark A. Flessner, Corporation Counsel

BY: /s/ Marion C. Moore

Marion C. Moore

Chief Assistant Corporation Counsel

30 N. LaSalle St., Suite 900

Chicago, IL 60602

(312) 744-7150

Atty. No. 06302566

Case: 1:20-cv-03997 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/08/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:2