alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AGA

American Gas Association

Submitted via cvberframework@nist.gov
March 17, 2023

US. Department of Commerce

National Institute of Standards and Technology
100 Bureau Drive

Gaithersburg, MD 20899

Re: AGA Comments to National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”)
request for additional input to the “NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
Concept Paper: Potential Significant Updates to the Cybersecurity

Framework” (“Concept Paper”) published on January 19, 2023
The American Gas Association (“AGA”) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the
National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) Cybersecurity Framework (“CSF”) 2.0
Concept Paper: Potential Significant Updates to the Cybersecurity Framework” (“Concept Paper”)

published on January 19, 2023.

AGA, founded in 1918, represents more than 200 local energy companies that deliver clean
natural gas throughout the United States. There are more than 77 million residential, commercial,
and industrial natural gas customers in the U.S., of which 95 percent — more than 73 million
customers — receive their gas from AGA members. AGA is an advocate for natural gas utility
companies and their customers and provides a broad range of programs and services for member
natural gas pipelines, marketers, gatherers, international natural gas companies, and industry

associates. Today, natural gas meets more than one third of the United States' energy needs.!

AGA members actively engage in cybersecurity risk management practices guided by a
commitment to the safe and secure delivery of natural gas. For nearly a decade, we have worked

along-side NIST promoting the adoption of the CSF across government and owner/operators. We

+ For more information, please visit www.aga.org.


appreciate the ongoing effort by NIST to support a broad, cross-sector cybersecurity framework

to reduce cybersecurity risk to critical infrastructure.

AGA members generally feel the CSF is a valuable tool that has been widely adopted by
many companies and partners. It is a risk- and performance-based framework critical for effective
management of cybersecurity vulnerabilities. As written, the CSF affords energy utilities the

latitude to balance safety and operational risks as driven by an evolving cyber threat landscape.

Recognizing there are areas for improvement, we caution against an overhaul of the CSF.
The language has become a common lexicon for many — interwoven into our cyber fabric — and
has already been built into many corporate processes and other frameworks. AGA is filing this
letter of support for the comments submitted by the Edison Electric Institute (“EET”) in response
to the additional input sought by NIST to the “NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 Concept Paper:
Potential Significant Updates to the Cybersecurity Framework” published on January 19, 2023.
EEI is the association that represents all U.S. investor-owned electric companies. AGA and EEI

have a common interest among our overlapping energy utility members.

AGA appreciates the opportunity to comment. Po |

Respectfully a
/ vA

~ “4 / | VA
LA 41 |Z —

Kimberly Denbow
Vice President, Security & Operations
American Gas Association
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 453 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                 House Calendar No. 199
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 453

                          [Report No. 105-563]

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 78) 
    proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                      restoring religious freedom.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 3, 1998

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 78) 
    proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                      restoring religious freedom.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 78) 
proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
restoring religious freedom. The joint resolution shall be considered 
as read for amendment. The amendment in the nature of a substitute 
recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the joint 
resolution shall be considered as adopted. The previous question shall 
be considered as ordered on the joint resolution, as amended, and on 
any further amendment thereto to final passage without intervening 
motion except: (1) two hours of debate on the joint resolution, as 
amended, equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; (2) the further 
amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying 
this resolution, which may be offered only by the Member designated in 
the report, shall be considered as read, and shall be separately 
debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent 
and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
                                     





                                                 House Calendar No. 199

105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 453

                          [Report No. 105-563]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 78) 
    proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                      restoring religious freedom.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 3, 1998

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 49 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     February 13, 1997.
Whereas Pamela C. Harriman served her country ably as United States Ambassador 
        to France from 1993 to early 1997;
Whereas during her tenure as ambassador Pamela Harriman worked tirelessly to 
        bring closer together as strong allies and friends the United States and 
        France;
Whereas Pamela Harriman worked throughout her adult life in the fields of 
        politics and the arts, enriching the lives of all who knew her and all 
        Americans;
Whereas during the Second World War Pamela Harriman endeavored to solidify 
        relations among Britain, the United States, and France, contributing her 
        knowledge and her efforts to making the alliance against Nazism a 
        success;
Whereas as a wife and friend she gave strength and wise counsel to one of the 
        great United States statesmen of this century, Governor Averell 
        Harriman; and
Whereas until the very end of her life she was renowned as a woman of grace, 
        wit, and charm: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Members of the House of Representatives--
            (1) are grateful for the life and service of this great 
        American; and
            (2) join in conveying their condolences and deepest 
        sympathies to the members of the family of Ambassador Pamela C. 
        Harriman.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
H. Res. 507

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 30, 1998.

Resolved,

SECTION 1. APPLICATION.

This resolution shall apply to the investigation by the

Committee on Education and the Workforce into the administration of labor laws by Government agencies, including the

Departments of Labor and Justice, concerning the International Brotherhood of the Teamsters, and other related

matters.

SEC. 2. HANDLING OF INFORMATION.

Information obtained under the authority of this resolution shall be—

(1) considered as taken in the District of Columbia

as well as at the location actually taken; and

(2) considered as taken in executive session by the

subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the

Committee on Education and the Workforce.
2

•HRES 507 EH

SEC. 3. DISPOSITION AND INTERROGATORIES.

The Chairman of the Committee on Education and the

Workforce, after consultation with the ranking minority member of the committee, may—

(1) order the taking of depositions or interrogatories anywhere within the United States, under oath

and pursuant to notice or subpoena; and

(2) designate a member, or staff of the committee

to conduct any such proceeding.

Attest:

Clerk.
Biometric Vulnerability 

Assessments

Dr. Ted Dunstone, Dr Geoff Poulton

(BI Technical Committee)

& Ms. Isabelle Moeller

(Manager) 
Goals of the Biometrics Institute

• Promote the responsible and ethical use of biometrics

• Provide forum for discussion about biometrics

• To educate and inform

• Promote and develop standards, benchmarks and test regimes

• To provide policy input to government

• To encourage appropriate research and development
Membership Biometrics Institute

Current Members:

• ~ 70 Users (incl. 47 state and federal government departments) 

• ~ 50 Suppliers

• ~ 10 Universities/ Research

• = 123 Organizations

– Recent Members include:

• FBI, Canadian Border Agency and British Standard
The BI Biometric Vulnerability Project

• Goal to create a robust, repeatable methodology around 

statistically assessing the likelihood of an attack succeeding.

• Three Projects (2007-2010)

– Carried out by consortia led by the Biometrics Institute

– Funding contributed by the Australian Government

• Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet

• Main Target: Access control systems

• Successfully completed: Face, Finger, Voice, Iris
Biometric Vulnerability Assessment 

Expert Group (BVAEG)
Current Members

• Biometrics Institute (Facilitator)

• Yokohama National University, Japan

• NIST, US

• National Physical Laboratory (NPL), UK

• Communications Electronic Securities Group (CESG), UK

• Clarkson University, USA

• University Carlos III of Madrid (UC3M) – Spain

• Federal Office for Information Security, Germany (BSI)
To help facilitate vulnerability 

resistance in biometric systems by: 

• Responsible sharing of information on 

vulnerabilities to a limited audience

• Engage constructively with the vendor 

community 

• Education for government, end-users, vendors

• Feed into standards and methodologies
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

OAKLEY, INC., 

 Plaintiff,

v.

ALL-INBIKE, et al.,

 Defendants.

Case No. 20-cv-03542

Judge Robert W. Gettleman

Magistrate Judge Young B. Kim

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL UNDER RULE 41(a)(1)

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. 

(“Plaintiff”) hereby dismisses this action with prejudice against the following Defendant:

Defendant Name Line No.

Lanfu Sport 17

Dated this 21st day of August 2020. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jake M. Christensen

Amy C. Ziegler

Justin R. Gaudio

Jake M. Christensen

Thomas J. Juettner

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500

Chicago, Illinois 60606

312.360.0080 / 312.360.9315 (facsimile)

aziegler@gbc.law

jgaudio@gbc.law

jchristensen@gbc.law

tjjuettner@gbc.law

Counsel for Plaintiff Oakley, Inc.

Case: 1:20-cv-03542 Document #: 48 Filed: 08/21/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:3425
Rev. 1/8/2021

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of Illinois

219 South Dearborn Street

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Thomas G. Bruton 312-435-5670

Clerk

Date: Case Number:

Case Title: Judge: 

Thomas G. Bruton, Clerk 

By: /s/

Deputy Clerk 

DIGITAL EXHIBIT INFORMATION FORM - PUBLIC

Filing Party:

Exhibit is linked to entry:

NOTE: This form is for Non-Sealed Documents only. For instructions regarding Sealed Documents, 

please see Local Rule 26.2.

If you wish to download a digital exhibit, please send your request to the Certified Copy Desk (CCD) 

inbox at CCD_ILND@ilnd.uscourts.gov. You will be provided with an invoice and charged according 

to the Fee Schedule. Once your payment has been processed, you will receive a URL via email to 

download the exhibit.

Case: 1:20-cv-00442 Document #: 116 Filed: 03/17/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:3618
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-11008 

Conference Calendar

__________________

STANLEY J. STEVENS,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

T. WHITAKER, Captain,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:95-CV-153

- - - - - - - - - -

March 1, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Stevens appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action

as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Stevens argues that the

defendant was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical

needs by disciplining him for refusing to work.

We have reviewed the record, the district court's opinion,

and appellant's brief and discern no reversible error. Further,

we hold that Stevens' appeal is frivolous, and accordingly, we

DISMISS it pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Stevens is hereby 
No. 95-11008

-2-

BARRED from filing any pro se, in forma pauperis, civil appeal in

this court, or any pro se, in forma pauperis, initial civil

pleading in any court which is subject to this court's

jurisdiction, without the advance written permission of a judge

of the forum court; the clerk of this court and the clerks of all

federal district courts in this Circuit are directed to return to

Stevens, unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with this

bar. 

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS IMPOSED.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 37

Authorizing the House of Representatives to participate in State and local

government transit programs pursuant to section 7905 of title 5, United

States Code.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 5, 1997

Mr. BLUMENAUER (for himself, Mr. EHLERS, Mr. DELLUMS, Ms. NORTON,

Mr. LEACH, Mr. GEJDENSON, Mr. MARKEY, Ms. FURSE, Mr.

KNOLLENBERG, Mr. BORSKI, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. WATT of North

Carolina, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mrs. KELLY, Mr. NADLER, Mr. ENGEL, Mr.

OLVER, Mr. FOGLIETTA, Mr. FROST, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr. BONIOR, and

Mr. LAFALCE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on House Oversight

RESOLUTION

Authorizing the House of Representatives to participate in

State and local government transit programs pursuant

to section 7905 of title 5, United States Code.

1 Resolved, That (a) the House shall participate in

2 State and local government transit programs to encourage

3 employees of the House of Representatives to use public

4 transportation pursuant to section 7905 of title 5, United

5 States Code.
2

•HRES 37 IH

1 (b) The Committee on House Oversight shall issue

2 regulations pertaining to House of Representatives partici3 pation in State and local government transit programs

4 through, and at the discretion of, its Members, commit5 tees, officers, and officials.

Æ
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 304

Directing the Committee on the Judiciary to undertake an inquiry into whether grounds exist to impeach William Jefferson Clinton, the President

of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 5, 1997

Mr. BARR of Georgia (for himself, Mr. STUMP, Mrs. CUBIN, Mr. GRAHAM,

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mrs. LINDA

SMITH of Washington, Mr. TIAHRT, Mr. METCALF, Mr. SOUDER, Mr.

PAUL, Mrs. CHENOWETH, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland,

Mr. HUNTER, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. MICA, and Mr. KINGSTON) submitted

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Directing the Committee on the Judiciary to undertake an

inquiry into whether grounds exist to impeach William

Jefferson Clinton, the President of the United States.

Whereas considerable evidence has been developed from a

broad array of credible sources that William Jefferson

Clinton, President of the United States, has engaged in

a systemic effort to obstruct, undermine, and compromise

the legitimate and proper functions and processes of the

executive branch: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Committee on the Judiciary is di2 rected to investigate and report to the House whether
2

•HRES 304 IH

1 grounds exist to impeach William Jefferson Clinton, Presi2 dent of the United States. Upon completion of such inves3 tigation, that Committee shall report to the House its rec4 ommendations with respect thereto, including, if the Com5 mittee so determines, a resolution of impeachment.

Æ
From: Jason Rupert

Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 9:46 AM

To: aiframework <aiframework@nist.gov>

Subject: W.r.t governance, consider referencing: ISO/IEC 38507:2022 Governance implications of the 

use of artificial intelligence by organizations

To Whom It May Concern, 

If possible, please be aware of the following: 

ISO/IEC 38507:2022 Information technology- Governance of IT - Governance implications of the use of 

artificial intelligence by organizations

When developing the “AI Risk Management Framework”, usage and appropriate reference to ISO/IEC 

38507:2022, especially in “AI Risk Management Framework” Section 6.1. Govern, may help to 

strengthen the planned framework.

That is, much use of ISO/IEC TS 5723:2022 was made in defining some crucial terms, e.g., safety. Similar 

approach to leverage the work in ISO/IEC 38507:2022 could be considered. 

Note: NIST AI RMF Playbook seemed to be void of additional guidance w.r.t. Governance, so it might 

also benefit from ISO/IEC 38507:2022. 

Jason Rupert

Senior Airworthiness Engineer

Modern Technology Solutions, Inc.
[No. 1745.]

#### James Bridges *v.*The State.

Practice in the Court of Appeals—Indictment.— Convictions cannot be sustained in this court upon transcripts which bring up no indictment.

Appeal from the District Court of Houston. Tried below before the Hon. F. A. Williams.

The verdict of the jury finds the defendant guilty of an assault with intent to murder, and awards him a term of two years in the penitentiary.

The opinion discloses the case.

*•J. 1£. Maxey,*for the appellant.

*J. II. Burts,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Willson, Judge.

There being no indictment in the record before us in this case, there is no support for the judgment of conviction. *(Turner*v. *The*State, 16 Texas Ct. App., 318; *Pierce*v. *The State,*14 Texas Ct. App., 365; *Beardall*v. *The*State, 4 Texas Ct. App., 631.)

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

*Reversed and remanded,*

[Opinion delivered February 18, 1885.]
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 8- 17 26

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lPla in ti

ff - App el le e

v.
W arre n Nel so n An de rs on , Jr.
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lDefe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Dis tri ctof M in ne so ta- St. Paul

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Decem

be r 4, 2 01 8 Fi le d: Jan ua ry

14 , 20 19 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re COLLOTON, GRUEND ER, an d S HEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

W arre n Nels on And ers on , Jr

. di rect ly ap pe al s th e se nt en ce im po se d by th e di st ric t co urt aft er he pl ead ed gu il ty to rece ip t of ch il d po rn og rap hy. In a br ie f fil ed

1

The Hon or ab le Jo an N. Eric ks en , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e Dis tri ct 1 of Mi nn es ot a.un de r Ander s v. Ca li fo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 73 8 (1 96 7) , And ers on arg ue s th at hi s se nt en ce of 90 m on th s in pr is on , be lo w th e ag reed -upo n Gui de li ne s im pr is on m en t ran ge of 12 1 t o 15 1 m on th s, is subs tant iv el y un reas on ab le , e ss en ti al ly rel y in g on a po li c y- b a s e d ch al le ng e to th e Gui de li ne s in ch il d po rn og rap hy cas es , se e Uni te d St at es v. Co ll in s , 82 8 F.3 d 38 6, 38 9 (6 th Ci r. 20 16 ) (n ot in g pl au si bi li ty of reject in g Gui de li ne s
se nt en ci ng ran ge s in ch il d po rn og rap hy cas es ba se d on po li cy di sa gr eem en ts ). Fo ll owi ng care fu l rev ie w, we fin d no ab us e of di sc ret io n. Se e Uni te d St at e s v

. Feems te r , 57 2 F.3 d 45 5, 46 1- 62 (8 th Ci r. 20 09 ) ( e n b a n c ) ( ex pl ai ni ng th at , aft er a
co ur t of ap pe al s en su res th at th e di st ric t co ur t co m m it te d no si gn ifi can t p r o cedur al

erro r, se nt en ces are re vi ewedun de r a d efer en ti al ab us e-o f-d is cret io n s ta nd ard ).

In ad di ti on , aft er in de pe nd en t rev ie w of th e reco rd pu rs ua nt to Pen so n v. Ohi o , 48 8 U.S. 75 (1 98 8) , we ha ve fo un d no no nf riv ol ou s is su es fo r ap pe al

. Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm th e jud gm en t o f t h e di st ric t co ur t, an d we gr an t co un se l’s m ot io n to wit hd raw.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 21, 2011 

d1114 

Order 

 

November 21, 2011 

142729(11) 

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 142729 

 ADB: 09-43-GA 

RAYMOND A. MACDONALD, 

Respondent-Appellant. 

________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 25, 2011 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 89-2 Filed: 11/22/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2519