alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 171

To urge the Federal Communications Commission to commence an inquiry

on distilled spirits advertising on television and radio.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 19, 1997

Mr. KENNEDY of Massachusetts (for himself, Mr. HANSEN, Mr. MARKEY, Mr.

CONYERS, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr.

DELLUMS, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. MINGE, Mr.

UNDERWOOD, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Ms. NORTON, Mr. MURTHA, and Mr.

RUSH) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

RESOLUTION

To urge the Federal Communications Commission to commence an inquiry on distilled spirits advertising on television and radio.

Whereas for forty-eight years, the distilled spirits industry

followed a self-imposed voluntary ban against advertising

their products on television or radio;

Whereas in June 1996, a distiller began airing 30-second

televised commercials for a popular whisky brand, marking the first major break with the voluntary industry ban;

Whereas in November 1996, the Distilled Spirits Council

ended its voluntary ban which had served the public interest since 1948;
2

•HRES 171 IH

Whereas the number of distillers advertising their products

on television and radio continues to increase;

Whereas alcohol is a factor in the 3 leading causes of death

for 15- to 24-year olds (accidents, homicides, suicides);

Whereas alcohol accounts for more than 100,000 deaths each

year;

Whereas a recent nationwide poll found that 69 percent of

American adults support a Federal Government investigation of the impact of television and radio advertising

of alcoholic beverages on teens and children;

Whereas the Federal Communications Commission has the

responsibility to ensure that the public interest is served

by uses of the public airwaves;

Whereas a Federal Communications Commission review of

the effects of the introduction of distilled spirits advertising on public airwaves would produce a factual record

that would be useful to Congress, the Administration, as

well as the public; and

Whereas the President, the Attorney General, Members of

Congress, numerous States, and hundreds of public interest groups and individuals have asked the Federal Communications Commission to examine various issues raised

by the introduction of distilled spirits advertising on television and radio: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Congress of the United States

2 urges the Federal Communications Commission to issue

3 a notice of inquiry to seek comment and gather facts relat4 ed to issues raised by the introduction of distilled spirits

5 advertising on television and radio, with a particular focus
3

•HRES 171 IH

1 on the effects of such advertisements on children and teen2 agers.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Timberline Resources Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Craig Crowell, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                  |                              |                  
|----------------- | ---------------------------- | -----------------
|                  |                             
|                  |                              |                  
|December 30, 2008 | By:                          | /s/ Craig Crowell
|                  | Craig Crowell               
|                  | Chief Accounting Officer    
|                  | Principal Accounting Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Timberline Resources Corporation and will be retained by Timberline Resources Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Norman Sydney HARRY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John ASHCROFT,1 Doris Meissner, Edward McElroy, Ins, United States Department of Justice, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 04-1585-PR.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Jan. 11, 2005.

Norman Sydney Harry, Far Rockaway, New York, for Appellant, pro se.

Varuni Nelson, Assistant United States Attorney, (Roslynn R. Mauskopf, United States Attorney, Eastern District of New York, on the brief, F. Franklin Amanat, Steven Kim, Assistant United States Attorneys), Brooklyn, New York, for Appellees, of counsel.

PRESENT: WINTER, SOTOMAYOR, and B.D. PARKER, Circuit Judges.

1

. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2), Attorney General John Ashcroft is substituted for former Attorney General Janet Reno as the named defendant in this suit.

SUMMARY ORDER

Norman Harry appeals from the December 15, 2003 judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the factual and procedural history of this matter.

We review the merits of a § 2241 petition and any other legal questions pertaining to subject matter jurisdiction *de novo. See Kuhali v. Reno,*266 F.3d 93, 99 (2d Cir.2001). For substantially the reasons set forth in the district court’s December 5, 2003 memorandum and order, we find no merit in Harry’s contentions that the BIA either used improper evidence or improperly exercised its discretion in denying him § 212(c) relief.

To the extent that the Government challenges the district court’s decision to deny Harry’s petition on the merits rather than dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction,2 we find this argument unavailing. This Court has read *Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t,*523 U.S. 83, 94, 118 *796S.Ct. 1003, 140 L.Ed.2d 210 (1998), as “barr[ing] the assumption of ‘hypothetical jurisdiction’ only where the potential lack of jurisdiction is a constitutional question.” *Fama v. Comm’r of Corr. Servs.,*235 F.3d 804, 816 n. 11 (2d Cir.2000). Here, the challenge to jurisdiction involved statutory requirements and no constitutional issues were presented. Therefore, the district court did not err in assuming jurisdiction and addressing the merits of Harry’s petition.

For these reasons, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

2

. Harry also contends that the "the lower court failed to find the appropriate jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus matters.” The district court, however, did not make a conclusive holding as to its jurisdiction.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the AnnualReport of U.S. Premium Beef, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-K for the periodended August 26, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the Report), I, Scott J. Miller, Chief Reporting andCompliance Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

|     |  |                                                          |
|-----|--|----------------------------------------------------------|
| By: |  | /s/ Scott J. Miller                                      |
|     |  | Scott J. Miller*Chief Reporting and  Compliance Officer* |

Date: November 17, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 526 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 526

 Condemning the launching by the Democratic People's Republic of Korea 
  of a ballistic missile in violation of Japanese air space, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 10, 1998

 Mr. Kim submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Condemning the launching by the Democratic People's Republic of Korea 
  of a ballistic missile in violation of Japanese air space, and for 
                            other purposes.

Whereas the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) launched a medium range 
        ballistic missile into the Pacific Ocean on August 31, 1998, in 
        violation of Japanese air space;
Whereas this act adds considerable tension to an already unstable region of the 
        world;
Whereas this missile launch comes at a time when new South Korean President Kim 
        Dae Jung is attempting to thaw relations with the DPRK by implementing 
        his ``Sunshine Policy'', which includes his proposal to have Kumgang 
        Mountain in the DPRK opened up to South Korean tourists;
Whereas official North Korean media criticized Japan for openly stating its 
        legitimate concern over the missile test;
Whereas the DPRK has openly engaged in the transfer of significant missile 
        technology to nations such as Iran, Syria, and Pakistan;
Whereas the United States has acted in good faith with regard to the DPKR and 
        provides more food aid and fuel oil to the DPRK than any other country;
Whereas some United States food aid has been diverted from its intended 
        beneficiaries to the armed forces, in clear violation of agreed upon 
        conditions; and
Whereas appeasement of hostile and irrational undemocratic regimes has had 
        disastrous consequences in this century: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) condemns the launching by the Democratic People's 
        Republic of Korea of a medium range ballistic missile in 
        violation of Japanese air space and calls upon the President to 
        seriously reevaluate the current policies of the United States 
        toward that country; and
            (2) urges the President to relay the serious concerns of 
        the House of Representatives to the Democratic People's 
        Republic of Korea regarding the missile launch and the 
        ramifications such missile launches could have on future food 
        and energy assistance to that country.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 219 (Thursday, November 13, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67349-67350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26745]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

20 CFR Part 404

[Docket No. SSA-2009-0038]
RIN 096-AH03


Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating Genitourinary Disorders; 
Correction

AGENCY: Social Security Administration.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a misspelling in the regulatory 
language of our final rulemaking published in the Federal Register on 
Friday, October 10, 2014, titled Revised Medical Criteria for 
Evaluating Genitourinary Disorders.

DATES: Effective December 9, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheryl A. Williams, Office of Medical 
Policy, Social Security Administration, 6401 Security Boulevard, 
Baltimore, Maryland 21235-6401, (410) 965-1020. For information on 
eligibility or filing for benefits, call our national toll-free number, 
1-800-772-1213, or TTY 1-800-325-0778, or visit our Internet site, 
Social Security Online, at http://www.socialsecurity.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 10, 2014 we published a final 
rulemaking in the Federal Register at 79 FR 61221. The final rulemaking 
contained an incorrect spelling of exstrophic. We are correcting that 
misspelling.

[[Page 67350]]

Correction

    In final rule FR Doc 2014-24114 published on October 10, 2014 at 79 
FR 61221, in the regulatory language section, make the following 
correction:

Appendix 1 to Subpart P of Part 404--[Corrected]

0
1. On page 61225 in the 2nd column, in paragraph A of Listing 106.00 of 
Part B of Appendix 1 to Subpart P of Part 404, correct ``exotrophic'' 
to read ``exstrophic''.

Paul Kryglik,
Director, Office of Regulations and Reports Clearance, Office of 
Legislative and Congressional Affairs, Social Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-26745 Filed 11-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191-02-P
#### Laurence WOODS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Steve PADILLAS; et al., Defendants— Appellees.

No. 03-35448.

D.C. No. CV-03-00161-OMP.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 6, 2004.*

Decided Dec. 20, 2004.

Laurence Woods, Portland, OR, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; Owen M. Panner, District Judge, Presiding.

Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*615MEMORANDUM**

Laurence Woods, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) for failure to state a claim his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that he is being unlawfully incarcerated because of racial prejudice by his parole officer. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Barren v. Harrington,*152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.1998) (order), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed without prejudice Woods’ action because a judgment in his favor would necessarily imply the invalidity of his conviction. *See Heck v. Humphrey,*512 U.S. 477, 487, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 69 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 69

  Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Banking and 
         Financial Services in the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 1997

Mr. Leach submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Banking and 
         Financial Services in the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Banking and Financial Services 
(hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), 
including the expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out 
of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for 
committee salaries and expenses, not more than $9,414,784.53 for the 
One Hundred Fifth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $4,568,817.48 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 1997, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 1998; and
            (2) not more than $4,845,967.05 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 1998, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 1999.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Oversight.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Oversight.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1   SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                             APD ANTIQUITIES, INC.
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the amended annual report of APD ANTIQUITIES, INC., a Nevada
corporation ("Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350) that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

3.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.


Date:  August 28, 2006

                              By:   Edward Wong Wah On
                                    ------------------
                                    Edward Wong Wah On
701 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Suite 800 

Washington, D.C. 20004–2654 

Tel: 202 783 8700 

Fax: 202 783 8750 

www.AdvaMed.org 

April 25, 2022 

National Institute of Standards and Technology 

100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8930 

Gaithersburg, MD 20899 

Re: Docket No. 220210-0045: Evaluating and Improving NIST Cybersecurity Resources: 

The Cybersecurity Framework and Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management 

To Whom It May Concern: 

The Advanced Medical Technology Association (“AdvaMed”) appreciates the opportunity to 

provide comments in response to the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s

(“NIST”) Request for Information: Evaluating and Improving NIST Cybersecurity 

Resources: The Cybersecurity Framework and Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk 

Management (“RFI”). AdvaMed represents manufacturers of medical devices, diagnostic 

products, and health information systems that are transforming health care through earlier 

disease detection, less invasive procedures, and more effective treatment. Our members 

range from the smallest to the largest medical technology innovators and companies. 

AdvaMed appreciates NIST’s desire to improve the Framework. Although the Framework is 

not directly applicable to the management of risks for medical devices, our members have 

found portions of the Framework suitable to their management of cybersecurity risks. 

Attached is a chart containing our responses to relevant RFI questions. 

AdvaMed would like to thank NIST for its consideration of these comments. Please do not 

hesitate to contact me at if you have any 

questions. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ 

Zachary A. Rothstein, J.D. 

Senior Vice President 

Technology and Regulatory Affairs 

Attachment 

Bringing innovation to patient care worldwide
XML Option A

• Allow XML as “User-defined” d

Type 2 Descriptive Text record

– And/or. . .

• Create a new Type N XML Use

data record.

Embed XML in current Retain existing structure mechanisms, but allow Xnumeric tags within a sin
XML Option B

• Create a tag name for the entire pa

• e.g., <ITL_Identification_Transmission_Pa

• Create tag names for each logical r

• e.g., <Tenprint_Fingerprint_Impressions>

• Create tag names to replace all num

• e.g., (for 1.004) <TypeOfTransaction>

• Recommend Base64 Encoding for 

binary data.

• Make length elements (e.g., 1.001) 

Define entire package uCreate XML structure for eliminate use of fs,gs,rs,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Dr. William P. Gress

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04279

Honorable Charles R.

Norgle Sr.

Vertical Plus MRI of America, LLC, Series 1

(Hazel Crest, IL), et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, February 8, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles R. Norgle: Plaintiff's individual

claims against Defendant are dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Plaintiff's claims

against defendant John Does 1−10 are dismissed without prejudice and without costs [54].

Civil case terminated. Mailed notice(ewf, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04279 Document #: 15 Filed: 02/08/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:51
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, Thomas D. Eckert, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
Capital Automotive REIT (the Company), has executed this certification in
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2004 (the Report). The undersigned hereby certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date: November 5, 2004
    
    BY:
    
    /s/
    
    Thomas D. EckertThomas D. EckertPresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### Michael Duffy, plaintiff *vs.*John (Casey, defendant.

1. It is improper for a receiver to pay over moneys, to any one, without the order of the court. No one' but the court has a right to decide to whom moneys received by him belong, or are payable. Counsel cannot determine that matter to their own satisfaction, and compel a receiver to pay them the moneys to which they think themselves entitled, under penalty of removal.

2. Hpon proper application, notice to the parties, and proof, the court will award money in the hands of a receiver to the party entitled. But until the receiver has accounted for the receipt and disbursement of moneys by him, no order can be made for the distribution of it.

(Before Robertson, Ch. J. at special term,

March 30, 1868)

*J. Sheehan,*for the motion and plaintiff.

*R. D. Livingston,*receiver, in person, opposed.