alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001049535
<NAME> CAVALRY BANCORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          11,421
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          44,263
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     40,923
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             714
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               704
<LOANS>                                        277,293
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,827
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 390,875
<DEPOSITS>                                     297,415
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,336
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,104
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,020
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 390,875
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 17,468
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,798
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,419
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                20,685
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,231
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,231
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           13,454
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      644
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,103
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,838
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,838
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,431
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.52
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.14
<LOANS-NON>                                        380
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,324
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,718
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       26
<RECOVERIES>                                         3
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,827
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,827
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC (the Company) for the
year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick Bratton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 31, 2006



/s/ Patrick BrattonPatrick BrattonChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
|Wachovia Securities 8739 Research Drive, URP4 Charlotte, NC 28288

WACHOVIA SECURITIES

Management Assertion
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2004, the Commercial Real Estate Servicing Division of Wachovia Bank, National Association (the Bank) has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of Americas(MBA's) Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, except for minimum servicing standards V.4. and VI.1., which the MBA has interpreted as being inapplicable to the servicing of commercial and multifamily loans. As of and for this same period, the Bank had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the amount of $200 million and $25 million, respectively. /s/ Alan Kronovet



3/8/05
Alan Kronovet



Date
Managing Director Wachovia Bank, National Association /s/ Clyde Alexander



3-8-05
Clyde Alexander



Date
Director Wachovia Bank, National Association /s/ Tim Steward



3-8-05
Tim Steward



Date
Director Wachovia Bank, National Association /s/ Tim Ryan




3-8-05
Tim Ryan




Date
Director Wachovia Bank, National Association
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.6.3

Eastern Division

Mish International Monetary Inc.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−04577

Honorable Manish S. Shah

Vega Capital London, Ltd., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, January 17, 2023:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motion for extension of

time [193] is granted. Defendants' answer to the second amended complaint is due

2/21/23. The stay of discovery is lifted. The parties' proposed case schedule remains due

1/20/23. The identity of Traders 7 and 10 may remain under seal in the previous filings for

now, but to the extent their identities are relevant to judicial decisionmaking in the future,

anonymity is not permitted without specific good cause. Plaintiff should file an

unredacted, public version of the second amended complaint identifying the defendants

Traders 1−6, 8−9, and 11−12, and Individual A before defendants file their answers on

2/21/23 and should propose a deadline to do so in the 1/20/23 status report. No appearance

on 1/19/23 is necessary. Notices mailed. (psm, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-04577 Document #: 195 Filed: 01/17/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2841
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 109 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 15, 1997.
Whereas American families currently pay too much of their hard-earned money in 
        taxes;
Whereas every American will work for at least 120 days in 1997 to pay his or her 
        share of taxes;
Whereas Americans should be allowed to keep more of their money to invest in 
        their childrens' futures, purchase homes, or start businesses; and
Whereas the American family will be strengthened by providing tax relief: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives urges that the Congress and the 
President work together to enact permanent tax relief for our Nation's families.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF 

ARKANSAS, A BODY POLITIC AND CORPORATE,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”,

Defendants.

Civil Action No.: 1:20-cv-03837

Judge Manish S. Shah

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey I. Cummings

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby files this Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal, without prejudice, as to the following Defendant(s) identified on Schedule A of the 

Complaint:

NO. DEFENDANT

263 DoreenBeads Choker Store

264 DoreenBeads Yiwu Store

262 Doreen Box Official Store

378 Chik yx

DATED: August 14, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt (Bar No. 6207971)

Keith Vogt, Ltd.

111 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1700

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Telephone: 312-675-6079

E-mail: keith@vogtip.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case: 1:20-cv-03837 Document #: 31 Filed: 08/14/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:5936
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document was electronically filed on August 14, 2020 with the Clerk of the Court using the 

CM/ECF system, which will automatically send an email notification of such filing to all registered 

attorneys of record.

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt

Case: 1:20-cv-03837 Document #: 31 Filed: 08/14/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:5937
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.1

Eastern Division

Eduardo Garcia, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02402

Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, June 20, 2023:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: An in−person status

hearing is set for 6/22/2023 at 9:30 a.m. Mailed notice. (cp, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02402 Document #: 189 Filed: 06/20/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:4323
Order entered October 2,, , 2012

In The 

## Court of 2ppea1o jf iftb /Bicstrict of Texao at attao

No. 05-12-01015-CR MICHAEL D. WILLIAMS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F94-03570-TK



### ORDER The Court DENIES appellant's September 17, 2012 motion for late reporter's record. The trial court's order denying appellant's request for post-conviction DNA testing does not indicate a hearing was held on appellant's motion for post-conviction DNA testing.
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order, by first-class mail, to Michael D. Williams, TDCJ No. 727667, Michaels Unit, 2664 F.M. 2054, Tennessee Colony, Texas, 75886.
Welcome to the SQLite Data Recovery module for Federated Testing Lite on (Windows 10)

Simply download the 3 items below and begin testing as defined in the module for SQLite as part of the 

Federated Test tool testing environment. 

You must download the Federated Lite Tool here: Federated Testing Project | NIST

An SQLITE dataset is available from https://cfreds.nist.gov/ that contains database tables that can be 

used in the testing process.

1. SQLite Databases (Header and Table 

info) https://cfreds.nist.gov/all/NIST/SQLiteDatabasesHeaderandTableinfo

2. SQLite Data Recovery (deleted and modified 

records) https://cfreds.nist.gov/all/NIST/SQLiteDataRecoverydeletedandmodifiedrecords

3. SQLite Database containing BLOB 

data https://cfreds.nist.gov/all/NIST/SQLiteDatabasecontainingBLOBdata

For more information contact cftt@nist.gov
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.1

Eastern Division

Glenn Williams, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−00420

Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt

City of Chicago, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, June 27, 2023:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's motion for

extension of time to complete discovery [224] is granted. Accordingly, the Court modifies

its prior scheduling order [223] as follows: All deadlines previously set by Judge Kendall

[219] are stricken. The parties are ordered to include an updated proposed discovery

schedule and briefing schedule on class certification in their joint Initial Status Report for

Reassigned Case that is now due 7/21/23. The 7/7/23 status report date is stricken. An

in−person status hearing is set for 7/27/23 at 10:30a.m. in Courtroom 1219. Mailed notice.

(kl, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-00420 Document #: 225 Filed: 06/27/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:4047
II

Calendar No. 241

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 960

[Report No. 105–127]

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 9, 1997

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

OCTOBER 31, 1997

Reported by Mr. MURKOWSKI, without amendment

AN ACT

To validate certain conveyances in the City of Tulare, Tulare

County, California, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 The Congress finds that:

5 (1) It is in the Federal Government’s interest

6 to facilitate local development of jobs in areas of

7 high unemployment.
2

HR 960 RS

1 (2) Railroad interests in rights-of-way prevent

2 local communities from obtaining clear title to prop3 erty for development unless the city also obtains the

4 Federal reversionary interest in those rights-of-way.

5 (3) For development purposes, in order to se6 cure needed financing, the City of Tulare Redevelop7 ment Agency requires clear title to certain parcels of

8 land within the city’s business corridor that are part

9 of a railroad right-of-way.

10 SEC. 2. TULARE CONVEYANCE.

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsections (c) and (d),

12 all conveyances to the Redevelopment Agency of the City

13 of Tulare, California, of lands described in subsection (b),

14 heretofore or hereafter, made directly by the Southern Pa15 cific Transportation Company, or its successors, are here16 by validated to the extent that the conveyances would be

17 legal or valid if all right, title, and interest of the United

18 States, except minerals, were held by the Southern Pacific

19 Transportation Company.

20 (b) LANDS DESCRIBED.—The lands referred to in

21 subsection (a) are the parcels shown on the map entitled

22 ‘‘Tulare Redevelopment Agency-Railroad Parcels Pro23 posed to be Acquired’’, dated 5/29/97, that formed part

24 of a railroad right-of-way granted to the Southern Pacific

25 Railroad Company, or its successors, agents, or assigns,
3

HR 960 RS

1 by the Federal Government (including the right-of-way ap2 proved by an Act of Congress on July 27, 1866). The map

3 referred to in this subsection shall be on file and available

4 for public inspection in the offices of the Director of the

5 Bureau of Land Management.

6 (c) PRESERVATION OF EXISTING RIGHTS OF AC7 CESS.—Nothing in this section shall impair any existing

8 rights of access in favor of the public or any owner of

9 adjacent lands over, under or across the lands which are

10 referred to in subsection (a).

11 (d) MINERALS.—The United States disclaims any

12 and all right of surface entry to the mineral estate of lands

13 described in subsection (b).

Passed the House of Representatives July 8, 1997.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
Calendar No. 241

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 960

[Report No. 105–127]

AN ACT

To validate certain conveyances in the City of

purposes.Tulare, Tulare County, California, and for other

OCTOBER 31, 1997

Reported without amendment
By: Alex Campero - Magruder High School

Mentor: Paul Kienzle

Time-Distributed Convolutional 

LSTM on Tomography Simulation
- Tomography: imaging of 

an object by using waves 

from different angles and 

positions

Geology: X-ray CT 

Oil and water on a rock

- Main Goal: Begin the project for 

frame prediction of tomographs

- Action recognition
Artificial neural networks are computing systems inspired

by the biological neural networks from animal brains

Convolutional Neural Network

Neural Networks: Object Recognition

LSTM

- Used for video, and image recognition - Good for processing 

sequences of data

+

=

ConvLSTM

- Find the feature on 

each frame

- Check to see if an 

action is being done
Why is this important? 

- Will help extract information from 

the 

- Less time consuming than manual 

labor
Building a Simulation and Generator

- Simulation that simulates what 

the neutron tomography would 

look like

- never ending

- Generator used to feed frames 

into the Neural Network
Time Distributed Layer

VS

- Merges images in layer -Each frame is separated

Looks at every specific frame rather than 

combining multiple frames in a series of data
Fitting the Generator to the Model 

Issues: 

- Input requirements: 

- Size requirements

- Channel numbers
Training the Neural Network

Issues: 

- Was not learning at first

- Changed number of layers and 

number of convolutions

- Batches and Epochs taking too long 

- Generate batches on GPU

Loss: Prediction error of NN
How this will be Implemented in the Future

- Will add autoencoders, help clear up image

- Will be used for frame prediction 
Questions?
Citations/acknowledgements:
#### William H. Nottingham v. Nathan H. Vincent.

*Beplevin*— Chattels *under hire*— Special *finding.*

*A.*special finding involving the conclusion that a certain person is holding chattels under an unexpired lease, is inconsistent with a general verdict for the lessor in an action of replevin brought by him against an officer who has levied on the chattels under an execution against the lessee, as it negatives the plaintiff's possessory right.

Error to Mecosta. (Bussell, J.)

April 19.

April 25.

Beplevin. Defendant brings error.

Beversed.

*W. W. Canpenter*and *Webster & Davis*for appellant.

Beplevin will not lie against a sheriff where plaintiff’s goods were left in the possession of a third person, even though the sheriff has requested him to take charge of them: *Bacon v. Davis*30 Mich. 157; *Hickey v. Hinsdale*12 Mich. 99; *Gidday v. Witherspoon*35 Mich. 369; *Maxon v. Perrott*17 Mich. 332; *Mills v. Van, Camp*41 Mich. 645; *462
      *Morrison v. Lambard*49 Mich. 548; where special findings are inconsistent with a general verdict the verdict must control : Comp. L. § 6026; *Keeler v. Robertson*27 Mich. 116; *Harzbaugh v. Cicott*33 Mich. 241.

*Frank Dumon*for appellee.

Graves, J.

The defendant as under-sheriff held an execution against one Calvin *W.*Nottingham, the plaintiff’s son, and took certain steps to effect a levy on a library of law books which the son was using. The plaintiff, claiming to own the books, brought this suit in replevin for them and obtained possession, and on the trial was allowed to recover generally. Several points were contested. It was contended by the plaintiff that he purchased the books from his son and leased them back to him.

The defendant claimed — 1st, that these dealings were merely colorable and in bad faith, and intended to defraud the son’s creditors; 2d, that the proceedings under the execution were not carried far enough to disturb the possession; and 3d, that the son and not the plaintiff held possession and the right to it.

Besides what related to other questions, there was evidence to be considered by the jury on this last proposition. It appeared from the plaintiff’s own testimony that his son hired the books from him for one year in 1874, and had ever since kept them in his office and used them in his law business.

The jury had grounds for saying that the first arrangement was continued from year to year.

In view of all the evidence on this subject they were asked to find specially whether at the commencement of the suit the son, Calvin W., was not entitled to the possession, and they found that he was. As a foundation for this result they must have found that the son was holding the books at hire for an unexpired term, and on that general hypothesis, with nothing to qualify it, the conclusion was accurate. *Hunt v. Strew*33 Mich. 85; *Gordon v. Harper*7 Term 9.

This finding was conclusive against the plaintiff. It *463determined that he had no possessory right to warrant replevin.

The judgment must be reversed with costs and a new trial granted.

The other Justices concurred.
19795-5:2011

“Access control scenario and grading scheme”

Rick Lazarick, Editor
What makes Part 5 different?

• Special case of Scenario test (part 2)

• Focus on Access Control

• Grading scheme1 (multi-purpose and reusable)

– Used for test reporting and requirements specification

– One test – many consumers

1 NVLAP 150-25, Scope 30GPT
Isolates the Biometric part from the PACS
Grading Quantified

GRADE FTE FRR* + TIME*

0 >7.7% >7.00% >6 sec

1 <7.7% <7.00% <6 sec

2 <3.5% <5.00% <5 sec

3 <1% <3.33% <4 sec

4 <2.00% <3 sec

5 <1.00%

6 <0.33%

* Graded at FAR = 0.1%. 0.3% and 1.0%

+ Graded for single attempt and transaction
The Benefits of Grading

– “One size fits many” – multiple consumers, re-usable

– Standardized practices support “Third Party” testing*

– Test results are comparable across products (modalities 

and models), across time, and between testing 

organizations (termed “Universality”)

– Reduced overall testing costs 

5 

“By standardising the test protocol and the 

quantification of performance into simple grade 

levels, the results of one product test can be 

leveraged by multiple users in different 

applications.”

* NVLAP 150-25, Scope 30GPT