alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2 MACQUARIE SECURITISATION LIMITED
OFFICERS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE I, Matthew OHare certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all
reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports
filed in respect of periods included in the period covered by this
annual report, of Macquarie Securitisation Limited;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports,
taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the
period covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing
information required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer
under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreements, for
inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;4.
    
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by
the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreements
and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review
required under those agreements, and except as disclosed in these
reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under those
agreements; and5.
    
    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to
the servicers compliance with the minimum servicing standards based
upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as
set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreements, that
is included in these reports. Date: December 16, 2004 /s/ Matthew OHare

Matthew OHare
Director
 10
Presidential Documents

67035 

Federal Register 

Vol. 79, No. 218 

Wednesday, November 12, 2014 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of November 7, 2014 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the 

Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction 

On November 14, 1994, by Executive Order (E.O.) 12938, the President 

declared a national emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary 

threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United 

States posed by the proliferation of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons 

(weapons of mass destruction) and the means of delivering such weapons. 

On July 28, 1998, the President issued E.O. 13094, amending E.O. 12938, 

to respond more effectively to the worldwide threat of weapons of mass 

destruction proliferation activities. On June 28, 2005, the President issued 

E.O. 13382, which, inter alia, further amended E.O. 12938, to improve 

our ability to combat proliferation. The proliferation of weapons of mass 

destruction and the means of delivering them continues to pose an unusual 

and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy 

of the United States; therefore, the national emergency first declared on 

November 14, 1994, and extended in each subsequent year, must continue. 

In accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 

U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing the national emergency declared in Executive Order 12938. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted 

to the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

November 7, 2014. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26896 

Filed 11–10–14; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3295–F5 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PRESDOC1OB#1.EPS</GPH>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 16, 2018

NO. 03-17-00496-CV

Judy Parker; her counsel Koby Wilbanks; Sam M. (Trey) Yates, III;

Mike Day; and the Law Office of Sam M. (Trey) Yates, III, P.C., Appellant

v.

Barry Parker, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND

VACATED AND DISMISSED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgments signed by the trial court on April 21, 2017. The parties 

have filed a joint motion to vacate the trial court’s judgments. Having considered the motion, the 

record in this case, and the parties’ arguments, the Court agrees that the motion should be 

granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion, vacates all “Trial Court Judgments and Orders 

Granting Sanctions and/or Attorney’s Fees and all Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Laws 

supporting Sanctions and/or Attorney’s Fees,” and dismisses the case. Each party shall pay the 

costs of appeal incurred by that party, both in this Court and the court below.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of SmartPros Ltd. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Allen S. Greene, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

/s/ Allen S. Greene
-------------------
Allen S. Greene
Chief Executive Officer

March 24, 2008
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.3


                       TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC.
                                  622 Broadway
                            New York, New York l0012


                                                               June 7, 2004


Dear Rich:

         We are pleased to confirm the terms of our agreement with respect to
your employment as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Take-Two Interactive
Software, Inc. (the "Company") on a full-time basis for a term of three (3)
years, reporting directly to the Board of Directors of the Company.

         For your prior services as Chairman and Interim Chief Executive
Officer, you were receiving an annual salary of $650,000. You also received
options to purchase 48,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price equal to
the closing price of the common stock as reported by Nasdaq on April 14, 2004
(vesting as to 4,000 shares per month).

         You were also entitled to receive or participate in all benefits and
plans which the Company may from time to time institute during such period for
its employees of like seniority and for which you are eligible and a car
allowance of $1,000 per month. Additionally, you were eligible to receive cash
bonuses at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

         This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with
the internal laws of the State of New York, and shall supersede any other
agreements between the parties.

         The parties agree to negotiate a definitive agreement with respect to
your employment as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, which shall contain
customary terms and conditions for an agreement of this type, including mutually
acceptable compensation (including stock-based compensation and bonus),
non-compete, non-solicitation and confidentiality provisions.

<PAGE>

         You represent that the execution of this Agreement and the discharge of
your obligations hereunder will not breach or conflict with any other contract,
agreement, or understanding between you and any other party or any law, rule or
regulation.

                                    Very truly yours,

                                    TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, INC.


                                    By:/s/ Karl H. Winters
                                       ---------------------------
                                    Name:  Karl H. Winters
                                    Title: Chief Financial Officer



AGREED TO ACCEPTED:



/s/Richard Roedel
-----------------
Richard Roedel
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of River RockEntertainment Authority (the “Authority”) on Form 10-K for the year endingDecember 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shawn S. Smyth, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Authority, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
|   | (1)    |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and                   |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | (2)    |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Authority. |

 
| By:                                      | /s/ SHAWN S. SMYTH |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
| Shawn S. Smyth                           |               |
| Chief Executive Officer, General Manager |               |
| April 14, 2008                      |               |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the River Rock Entertainment Authorityand will be retained by the River Rock Entertainment Authority and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
65350 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 213 / Tuesday, November 4, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

been approved by OMB and have not 

changed since that approval. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26117 Filed 11–3–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 74 

[FCC 14–150] 

Commission Suspends Expiration 

Dates and Construction Deadlines for 

New Digital Low Power Television and 

TV Translator Stations 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule; suspension of 

expiration dates. 

SUMMARY: The Commission announced 

that, effective immediately, it is 

suspending the expiration dates and 

construction deadlines for all 

outstanding construction permits for 

new digital low power television (LPTV) 

and TV translator stations. The 

Commission will decide on a new 

construction deadline for these 

permittees in the rulemaking proceeding 

in MB Docket No. 03–185. Until a 

decision is reached in the rulemaking 

decision and the Commission can 

determine the effect of the future 

incentive auction and repacking, 

permittees of new digital LPTV and TV 

translator stations may delay completing 

construction of their digital facilities. 

DATES: The suspension became effective 

on October 10, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Shaun Maher, Video Division, Media 

Bureau, Federal Communications 

Commission, Shaun.Maher@fcc.gov, 

(202) 418–2324. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective 

immediately, the expiration dates and 

construction deadlines for all 

outstanding unexpired construction 

permits for new digital low power 

television (LPTV) and TV translator 

stations set forth in 47 CFR 74.788 are 

hereby suspended pending final action 

in the rulemaking proceeding in MB 

Docket No. 03–185 initiated today by 

the Commission. In a Third Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking released October 

10, 2014 in MB Docket No. 03–185 (FCC 

14–151) the Commission recognized 

that the incentive auction and repacking 

process will impact existing analog 

LPTV and TV translator stations 

transitioning to digital and, because of 

this, it tentatively concluded to 

postpone the September 1, 2015 digital 

transition date. For similar reasons, the 

Commission also tentatively concluded 

to extend the construction deadlines of 

permits for new digital LPTV and TV 

translator stations and proposed that 

these permits be subject to whatever 

new transition date is adopted. This 

proposed action would also have the 

effect of treating these permittees 

similarly to the permittees of 

transitioning LPTV and TV translator 

stations. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26064 Filed 11–3–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 


rmajette on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

          - [MMAA104000]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Interior.

# ACTION:

List of Restricted Joint Bidders.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authority vested in the Director of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management by the joint bidding provisions of 30 CFR 556.41, each entity within one of the following groups is restricted from bidding with any entity in any of the other following groups at Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas lease sales to be held during the bidding period November 1, 2014, through April 30, 2015. This List of Restricted Joint Bidders will cover the period November 1, 2014, through April 30, 2015, and replace the prior list published on May 5, 2014, which covered the period May 1, 2014, through October 31, 2014.

Group I 

BP America Production Company

BP Exploration & Production Inc.

BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.

Group II 

Chevron Corporation

Chevron U.S.A. Inc.

Chevron Midcontinent, L.P.

Unocal Corporation

Union Oil Company of California

Pure Partners, L.P.

Group III 

Exxon Mobil Corporation

ExxonMobil Exploration Company

Group IV 

Petroleo Brasileiro S.A.

Petrobras America Inc.

Group V 

Shell Oil Company

Shell Offshore Inc.

SWEPI LP

Shell Frontier Oil & Gas Inc.

SOI Finance Inc.

Shell Gulf of Mexico Inc.

Group VI 

Statoil ASA

Statoil Gulf of Mexico LLC

Statoil USA E&P Inc.

Statoil Gulf Properties Inc.

Group VII 

Total E&P USA, Inc.

Dated: October 20, 2014.

Walter D. Cruickshank,

Acting Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.

[FR Doc. 2014-25651 Filed 10-28-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
CFTC Ex. 414

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-13 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1112
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-13 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:1113
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 77-13 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:1114
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Artemis Spacesuits","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Rq8lj39t3S\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/houston-we-have-a-podcast\/artemis-spacesuits\/\">Artemis Spacesuits<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/houston-we-have-a-podcast\/artemis-spacesuits\/embed\/#?secret=Rq8lj39t3S\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Artemis Spacesuits” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Rq8lj39t3S\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/artemis_spacesuits_-_resize_0.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
#### Malinda B. Passmore, etc., *v.*John K. Wilson.

Husband and Wife — Mortgage—Separate and General Estate of Wife— Burden of Proof on Grantor to Show Separate Estate.

The burden of proof is on tbe grantor in a mortgage to show the property to be a separate estate, in order to exempt it from the operation of a mortgage.

APPEAL PROM MERCER CIRCUIT COURT.

October 14, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Hardin :

The allegations of the petition import that the property mortgaged was the general estate of Mrs. Passmore, and as she might convey such estate by mortgage, whether for necessaries or not, the only question that could arise in the case, as presented, is whether the property is general or separate estate.

On that question the burden was upon the grantors in the mortage to show the property to be separate estate in order to *437exempt it from the operation of the mortgage, and this they wholly failed to do.

*Kyle, for appellants.*

*J. B. & P. B. Thompson, for appellee.*
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David J. Keefe, certify that:

1. I have reviewed
this annual report on Form 10-K of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                     |  |                                     
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2006
|                     | 
|By:                  |  | /s/ David J. Keefe                  
|                     |  | David J. Keefe                      
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6538

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH RICKY DODD, a/k/a Big Stuff,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-96-153, CA-00-896-2)

Submitted: June 12, 2003 Decided: June 23, 2003

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Ricky Dodd, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Ricky Dodd appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See United States v. Dodd, Nos. CR-96-153; CA-00-896-2

(E.D. Va. Mar. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED