alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment to 2000 Equity Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
 2000 EQUITY PLAN OF 
 BEASLEY BROADCAST GROUP, INC. 
  
 Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. (the “Company”), a corporation
organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, by resolution of its Board of Directors (the “Board”) adopted The 2000 Equity Plan of Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. (the “Plan”), effective as of February 11, 2000. Section 11.2
of the Plan authorizes the Board to amend the Plan at any time or from time to time. This Plan amendment was adopted by resolution of the Board on June 3, 2003, effective upon approval of the Company’s stockholders as set forth in the
resolution. This Plan amendment, together with the Plan, constitutes the entire Plan as amended to date. 
  
 1. Section 2.1(a) of the Plan is amended by deleting Section 2.1(a) in its entirety and replacing it with the following new Section 2.1(a): 
  
 Section 2.1(a). The shares of stock subject to Awards shall be Class A
Common Stock, initially shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock, par value $.001 per share. The aggregate number of such shares which may be issued upon exercise of such Options or rights or upon any such awards under the Plan shall not
exceed four million (4,000,000). The shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon exercise of such Options or rights or upon any such awards may be either previously authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares. 
  
 Dated: June 3, 2003 
  
 BEASLEY BROADCAST GROUP, INC. 
  

					
		
	 By:
	 	/s/    Caroline Beasley        


	 	 	Name:	 	Caroline Beasley
	 	 	Title:	 	VP/CFO
#### Roswell T. Hatch, executor, &c. plaintiff and appellant, *vs.*John B. Fogerty, impleaded, &c. defendant and respondent.

1. It is not necessary to except to findings of fact, or refusals to pass upon them. Any question as to the necessity of, or propriety of passing upon the latter is to be determined upon an application to have such facts as are material, and upon which there is any evidence, passed upon by the judge, in settling the case.

2. Exceptions to conclusions of law must he served within the time fixed by the Code, otherwise they are too late; unless included in a case served within that time. An extension of time to make a case, alone, does not extend the time to take exceptions also, beyond the time so fixed.

8. A general statement at the end of the conclusions of law in the case, that the party excepted to each of them separately, is all that is necessary.

(Before Robertson, Ch. J., and Barbour, J.)

Heard October 12, 1868;

decided December 31, 1868.
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 575 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                 House Calendar No. 267
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 575

                          [Report No. 105-778]

    Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                     Rules, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 5, 1998

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
    Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                     Rules, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI for a two-
thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported from that committee before the legislative day of 
October 11, 1998, providing for consideration or disposition of any of 
the following:
            (1) A bill or joint resolution making general 
        appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1999, 
        any amendment thereto, any conference report thereon, or any 
        amendment reported in disagreement from a conference thereon.
            (2) A bill or joint resolution that includes provisions 
        making continuing appropriations for fiscal year 1999, any 
        amendment thereto, any conference report thereon, or any 
        amendment reported in disagreement from a conference thereon.
    Sec. 2. It shall be in order at any time before October 11, 1998, 
for the Speaker to entertain motions to suspend the rules, provided 
that the object of any such motion is announced from the floor at least 
two hours before the motion is offered. In scheduling the consideration 
of legislation under this authority, the Speaker or his designee shall 
consult with the Minority Leader or his designee.
                                     





                                                 House Calendar No. 267

105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 575

                          [Report No. 105-778]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

    Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                     Rules, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 5, 1998

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
EXHIBIT 32.1: Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1850 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Nutek Oil, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Murray N. Conradie,
Chief  Executive Officer  of  the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.
Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, and that to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                         /s/ Murray N. Conradie
                         -------------------------------------------
                         MURRAY N. CONRADIE, Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 30, 2005
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50131 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

FACUNDO BALDERAS-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

(DR-01-CR-402-1)

-------------------- January 8, 2003 Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
The government appeals from the se ntence imposed on Facundo
Balderas-Sanchez for his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry
into the United States afte r deportation. Specifically, thegovernment challenges the district court’s holding that BalderasSanchez’s prior Texas conviction for simple possession of marijuana
did not warra nt an eight-level adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G.
§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(C) because it did not constitute an “aggravated2

felony.” This issue is reviewed d e novo . S ee United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez , 130 F.3d 691, 693 (5th Cir. 1997).
The government’s challenge is supported by our recent holding
in United States v. Caicedo-Cuero , __ F.3d __, 5th Cir. Nov. 14, 2002, No. 02-20751), 2002 WL 31521599. In that case, we affirmed
the district court’s imposition of an eight-level adjustment under
U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1 )(C) for the defendant’s prior Texas conviction for simple possession of marijuana. 2002 WL 31521599,

at *7-11. In doing so, we referenced the district court’s holding in the instant case and expressly disagreed with it. Id. at *8. Accordingly, Balderas-Sanchez’s sentence is VACATED and the

case is REMANDED for resentencing in conformity with our holding in
Caicedo-Cuero

. SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED for resentencing.
H. Res. 454

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 4, 1998.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order to consider in the House the resolution (H.

Con. Res. 285) expressing the sense of the Congress that the

President of the United States should reconsider his decision

to be formally received in Tiananmen Square by the Government of the People’s Republic of China. The resolution shall

be considered as read for amendment. The previous question

shall be considered as ordered on the resolution to final adoption without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the resolution equally divided and controlled by the

Majority Leader or his designee and a Member opposed to

the resolution; and (2) one motion to recommit.

Attest:

Clerk.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 114

Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 16, 1997

Mr. LINDER submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating majority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Members be, and

2 they are hereby, elected to the following standing commit3 tee of the House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERV5 ICES: Mr. Manzullo, Mr. Foley, and Mr. Jones.

Æ
Exhibit 10.7  Schedule of the Owners of Company-Managed Texas
Roadhouse Restaurants and the Interests Held by Directors, Executive Officers and 5%
Stockholders Who Are Parties to Limited Partnership Agreements and Operating Agreements  As of December 29, 2009  Entity Name
  
  Restaurant Location
  
  Percentage of 
  Holdings Interest
  
  Actual Management Fee
  Charged
  
  Percentage Owned by
  Executive Officers,
  Directors & 5%
  StockholdersRoadhouse of Longmont, LLC
  
  Longmont,
  CO
  
  5
  %
  0.5
  %
  47.5
  %Texas Roadhouse of Hiram, LLC
  
  Hiram,
  GA
  
  10
  %
  
  
  Texas Roadhouse of Marietta, LLC
  
  Marietta,
  GA
  
  10
  %
  2.0
  %
  Roadhouse of Wichita, LLC
  
  Wichita,
  KS
  
  5
  %
  0.5
  %
  55.1
  %Roadhouse of Bossier City, LLC
  
  Bossier
  City, LA
  
  5
  %
  0.5
  %
  65
  %Texas Roadhouse of Everett, LLC
  
  Everett,
  MA
  
  5
  %
  0.5
  %
  50
  %Texas Roadhouse of Billings, LLC
  
  Billings,
  MT
  
  5
  %
  0.5
  %
  57
  %Roadhouse of Omaha, LLC
  
  Omaha,
  NE
  
  5.49
  %
  0.5
  %
  79.67
  %Roadhouse of Fargo, LLC
  
  Fargo,
  ND
  
  5.05
  %
  0.5
  %
  88.89
  %Roadhouse of Montgomeryville, LLC
  
  Montgomeryville, PA
  
  7.5
  %
  1.75
  %
  Roadhouse of Memphis, LLC
  
  Memphis,
  TN
  
  10
  %
  
  
  Texas Roadhouse of Brownsville, Ltd.
  
  Brownsville,
  TX
  
  5.09
  %
  0.5
  %
  91.84
  %Roadhouse of McKinney, Ltd.
  
  McKinney,
  TX
  
  5
  %
  0.5
  %
  62
  %Texas Roadhouse of Port Arthur, Ltd.
  
  Port
  Arthur, TX
  
  5
  %
  0.5
  %
  91.5
  %Roadhouse of Temple, Ltd.
  
  Temple,
  TX
  
  5
  %
  0.5
  %
  77
  %Roadhouse of New Berlin, LLC
  
  New
  Berlin, WI
  
  5
  %
  0.5
  %
  62
  %
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Carlos A. Riva, the Chief Executive Officer of Verenium Corporation (the Company), and James
E. Levine, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                |  |  |  |                                                     
|----------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 9, 2010                         |  |  |  |                                                     
|                                                |  | 
|/s/ Carlos A. Riva                              |  |  |  | /s/ James E. Levine                                 
|Carlos A. Riva                                  |  |  |  | James E. Levine                                     
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

This
certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Verenium Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 51

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary in

the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 12, 1997

Mr. HYDE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Oversight

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on

the Judiciary in the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

3 For the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary

4 (hereinafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Commit5 tee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses,

8 not more than $12,037,046 for the One Hundred Fifth

9 Congress.
2

•HRES 51 IH

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

2 Of the amount specified in section 1—

3 (1) not more than $5,732,403 shall be available

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

5 noon on January 3, 1997, and ending immediately

6 before noon on January 3, 1998; and

7 (2) not more than $6,304,643 shall be available

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at

9 noon on January 3, 1998, and ending immediately

10 before noon on January 3, 1999.

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner

15 directed by the Committee on House Oversight.

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by

19 the Committee on House Oversight.

Æ
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|                                 |  |                                
|-------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|Name                             |  | Territory or State of Formation
|EHP Operating Partnership, L.P.  |  | Maryland                       
|Eagle San Juan Suites, LLC       |  | Delaware                       
|EHP San Juan Suites, LLC         |  | Puerto Rico                    
|EHP Rochester Hotel Holding, LLC |  | Delaware                       
|EHP Rochester Hotel, LLC         |  | Delaware                       
|EHP Boston Suites, LLC           |  | Delaware                       
|EHP Glendale, LLC                |  | Delaware                       
|EHP Phoenix Suites, LLC          |  | Delaware                       
|EHP RiverCenter Landmark, LLC    |  | Kentucky                       
|EHP Burr Ridge, LLC              |  | Illinois                       
|EHP RiverCenter Suites, LLC      |  | Kentucky                       
|EHP CVG Airport, LLC             |  | Kentucky                       
|EHP DIA Suites, LLC              |  | Colorado                       
|EHP Westshore Suites, LLC        |  | Florida                        
|EHP Independence Suites, LLC     |  | Ohio                           
|EHP Dublin Suites, LLC           |  | Ohio                           
|EHP Boston Suites, LLC           |  | Delaware                       
|EHP TRS Holding Co., Inc.        |  | Maryland                       
|Boston Suites TRS, Inc.          |  | Maryland                       
|Rochester Hotel TRS, Inc.        |  | Maryland                       
|Dublin Suites TRS, Inc.          |  | Maryland                       
|Independence Suites TRS, Inc.    |  | Maryland                       
|Westshore Suites TRS, Inc.       |  | Maryland                       
|DIA Suites TRS, Inc.             |  | Maryland                       
|CVG Airport TRS, Inc.            |  | Maryland                       
|RiverCenter Suites TRS, Inc.     |  | Maryland                       
|Burr Ridge TRS, Inc.             |  | Maryland                       
|RiverCenter Landmark TRS, Inc.   |  | Maryland                       
|Phoenix Suites TRS, Inc.         |  | Maryland                       
|Glendale Hotel TRS, Inc.         |  | Maryland
#### Musa Nabieu BANGURA, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Respondent.

No. 03-1208.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued: Oct. 26, 2004.

Decided: Dec. 8, 2004.

Randall Lee Johnson, Johnson *&*Associates, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner.

Margaret Kuehne Taylor, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

*239Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Mary Jane Candaux, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Musa Bangura, a native and citizen of the Republic of Sierra Leone, seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming without opinion the Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for asylum and withholding of removal.

We first reject Bangura’s claim that he established eligibility for asylum and withholding of removal. In its decision, the Board found that Bangura had not established a well-founded fear of persecution based upon his political beliefs and opinions if he returned to Sierra Leone. To obtain reversal of this decision, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Bangura has not shown that the evidence compels a different result. Bangura thus cannot also meet the higher standard for withholding of removal. *See INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca,*480 U.S. 421, 430, 107 S.Ct. 1207, 94 L.Ed.2d 434 (1987).

We also reject Bangura’s claim that the Board’s summary affirmance procedure violates his right to due process because the Board did not give detailed consideration of his claim. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(a)(7)(2004). We have previously held that the summary affirmance procedure comports with due process and after reviewing the record, we find nothing in Bangura’s case that suggests his claim was not handled with the required consideration. *See Blanco de Belbruno v. Ashcroft,*362 F.3d 272, 281-83 (4th Cir.2004).

Because we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s denials and Bangura’s right to due process was not violated by the summary affirmance procedure, the petition for review is

*DENIED.*
H. Res. 476

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 18, 1998.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the resolution (H. Res. 463) to establish the Select Committee on U.S. National Security and

Military/Commercial Concerns With the People’s Republic of

China. The resolution shall be considered as read for amendment. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Rules now printed in the

resolution shall be considered as adopted. The resolution, as

amended, shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

the Committee on Rules. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the resolution, as amended, to final

adoption without intervening motion.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 PURSUANT
TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B)
 
 OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of EPL Intermediate, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary Campanaro, Chief
Financial Officer for the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
  1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
   2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 Date:
March 31, 2009
  /s/ Gary CampanaroGary
    CampanaroChief
      Financial Officer
                  EPL Intermediate,
Inc.
 
 This
certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not
for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to EPL Intermediate, Inc. and will be retained by
EPL Intermediate, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.