alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 404

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 9, 1998.

Whereas 1998 marks 100 years of special ties between the

people of the United States and the people of the Philippines and is also the centennial celebration of Philippine independence from Spain which initiated relations

with the United States;

Whereas the people of the Philippines have on many occasions demonstrated their strong commitment to democratic principles and practices, the free exchange of views

on matters of public concern, and the development of a

strong civil society;

Whereas the Philippines has embraced economic reform and

free market principles and, despite current challenging

circumstances, its economy has registered significant economic growth in recent years benefiting the lives of the

people of the Philippines;

Whereas the large Philippine-American community has immeasurably enriched the fabric of American society and

culture;

Whereas Filipino soldiers fought shoulder to shoulder with

American troops on the battlefields of World War II,

Korea, and Vietnam;
2

•HRES 404 EH

Whereas the Philippines is an increasingly important trading

partner of the United States as well as the recipient of

significant direct American investment;

Whereas the United States relies on the Philippines as a

partner and treaty ally in fostering regional stability, enhancing prosperity, and promoting peace and democracy;

and

Whereas the 100th anniversary of relations between the people of the United States and the people of the Philippines

offers an opportunity for the United States and the Philippines to renew their commitment to international cooperation on issues of mutual interest and concern: Now,

therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) congratulates the Philippines on the commemoration of its independence from Spain;

(2) looks forward to a broadening and deepening of

friendship and cooperation with the Philippines in the

years ahead for the mutual benefit of the people of the

United States and the people of the Philippines;

(3) supports the efforts of the Philippines to further

strengthen democracy, human rights, the rule of law,

and the expansion of free market economics both at

home and abroad; and

(4) recognizes the close relationship between the nations and the people of the United States and the people

of the Philippines and pledges its support to work closely
3

•HRES 404 EH

with the Philippines in addressing new challenges as we

begin our second century of friendship and cooperation.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Bell & Marlay *v.*James Cocham.

Accounts and Accounting — Set-off and Counter-claim, by Reason of Defects— Waiver.

To a suit on account, and a set-off is filed, for defects, in tlie machinery bought, the fact that the defendant had ordered new parts for the machinery, to put it in perfect condition, is not a waiver of his original claim for defects, unless the quality and kind of parts ordered were furnished.

APPEAL PROM ELEMING CIRCUIT COURT.

September 29, 1870.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Hardin :

It is contended for the appellants that if the mills were *108defective, as the evidence conduces to show, the- appellee’s letters of August 30th, 1867 and September 11th, 1867, bound him to pay the balance of the appellant’s account of 1866, upon compliance with his request for new rollers and boxes, and that this was a new contract which waived objections' to defects in the property as at first furnished. But admitting this and that new rollers and boxes were sent, the appellant im order to bind the appellee by his letters were bound to furnish the quality and kind of rollers and boxes that were ordered, or the furnishing of them did not waive the previous objections of the appellee. The proof conduces to the belief that the new articles furnished were as defective as those they were intended to replace, and that the appellee rejected them as he had a right to do.

*Oord, for appellant.*

*Givens &*Anderson, *for appellee.*

The counter claim and partial failure of the original consideration, were therefore properly considered. .And upon the evidence thus rightly heard, we think the judgment was as favorable to the plaintiffs as they had any right to expect.

Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed.*
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**INDEX
      OIL AND GAS INC.**


**FORM
      10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2007**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Andrew
      Boetius, Chief Financial Officer of Index Oil and Gas Inc. (the "Company"),
      hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
      The
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the “Annual Report”) of the Company for the year
      ended March 31, 2007, which this certification accompanies (the "Annual
      Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





By:
              */s/
                  Andrew Boetius*Dated:
                  June 21, 2007
              
              Name:
                  Andrew Boetius
                Title:
                  Chief Financial Officer, acting Principal Financial Officer, and
                  acting
                  Principal Accounting Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

   DISPATCH MANAGEMENT SERVICES CORP. STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET
                                INCOME PER SHARE
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Three Months Ended
                                                                March 31,
                                                             1997         1998
                                                            ------       ------
<S>                                                         <C>          <C>
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
  Loss before extraordinary item                            $ (14)      $  (32)
  Extraordinary item-loss on early extinguishment of debt,
    net of income taxes                                                   (713)
                                                            ------      ------- 
  Net loss                                                  $ (14)      $ (745)
                                                            ======      =======
  Weighted average shares outstanding                         847        6,806
                                                            ======      =======
  Loss before extraordinary item                            (0.02)       (0.00)
  Extraordinary item-loss on early extinguishment of debt,
    net of income taxes                                                  (0.11)
                                                            ------      -------
  Net loss per share                                        (0.02)       (0.11)
                                                            ======      =======
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
  Loss before extraordinary item                            $ (14)      $  (32)
  Extraordinary item-loss on early extinguishment of debt,
    net of income taxes                                                   (713)
                                                            ------      -------
  Net loss                                                  $ (14)      $ (745)
                                                            ======      =======
  Weighted average shares outstanding                         847        6,806
  Common stock equivalents from stock options                               51
                                                            ------      -------
  Total weighted average shares outstanding                   847        6,857
                                                            ======      =======
  Loss before extraordinary item                            (0.02)       (0.00)
  Extraordinary item-loss on early extinguishment of debt,
    net of income taxes                                                  (0.11)
                                                            ------      -------
  Net loss per share                                        (0.02)       (0.11)
                                                            ======      =======
</TABLE>
H. Res. 105

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 21, 1997.

Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this

resolution the House shall consider without the intervention

of any point of order the resolution (H. Res. 91) providing

amounts for the expenses of certain committees of the House

of Representatives in the One Hundred Fifth Congress. The

resolution shall be considered as read for amendment. An

amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the

text of House Resolution 102 shall be considered as adopted.

The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the

resolution, as amended, to final adoption without intervening

motion or demand for division of the question except: (1) one

hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman

and ranking minority member of the Committee on House

Oversight; and (2) one motion to recommit.

Attest:

Clerk.
Board of
Directors
 China
Architectural Engineering, Inc.
 
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We hereby
consent to your disclosure of our audit report dated April 30, 2010 covering
three years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 for the consolidated
statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows and two years at
December 31, 2009 and 2008 for the consolidated balance sheets included in the
Form 10-K/A No. 3 of China Architectural Engineering, Inc.
 
 For the
purpose of the aforesaid Form 10-K/A No. 3, we also consent to the reference of
our firm as "Experts" under the 'Experts' caption, which, in so far as
applicable to our firm means accounting experts.
 
 South
      San Francisco, California
                May
      27, 2010
              Samuel
      H. Wong & Co., LLP
                Certified
      Public Accountants
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8550 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 1
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel, are you 

a 

 Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this Court’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 U.S.C.§1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on 

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary of Transportation

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary of Transportation, Department of Transportation (DOT).

# ACTION:

Notice of availability.

# SUMMARY:

                        DOT is announcing the availability of guidance implementing Section 1319 of MAP-21, on Accelerated Decisionmaking in Environmental Reviews. This section of MAP-21 provides for the use of errata sheets on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, in lieu of a Final EIS (FEIS), when the EIS has limited or factual changes. It also states that the lead agency under NEPA shall issue a combined FEIS and ROD unless circumstances exist to make it impracticable. This eliminates the 30-day wait period between the release of the FEIS and ROD. This guidance builds on the interim guidance that was released by FHWA and FTA in January 2013, but applies to the entire Department. The FHWA and FTA interim guidance is retained as a supplemental appendix specific to those agencies. The guidance is available at                         *http://www.dot.gov/​office-policy/​transportation-policy/​guidance-accelerated-decision-making-environmental-reviews*.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Rebecca Higgins, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE. W84-318, Washington, DC 20590; email                         *Rebecca.Higgins@dot.gov;*                         telephone (202) 366-7098.                    

Issue Date: November 3, 2014.

Shoshana Lew, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy.

[FR Doc. 2014-26731 Filed 11-12-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

OUYEINC LTD.,

Plaintiff,

v.

Alucy and et al., 

Defendants.

Case No. 20 cv 3490

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL UNDER RULE 41(a)(1)

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Ouyeinc Ltd.

(“Ouyeinc” or “Plaintiff”) hereby dismisses this action with prejudice pursuant to settlement as 

to the following Defendants:

Defendant Name Line No.

Accessories_mall 106

Auto_park9 120

Besttrade360 142

Echoii_mall 217

Globedealfield 253

Globedealshop 254

Gooddealfrance 257

Healthcare365 278

Home_garden360 282

Case: 1:20-cv-03490 Document #: 58 Filed: 09/14/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:252
Jianjianstore 314

Le_ji84 333

Makeupfactory 353

Onebuymall 391

Rightshere 427

Sellingplus100 438

Sporting_shop 458

Super_deal321 467

Yourreliableseller365 533

Auwer Summer Hot Sale Up To 50% Off 6

Zeoo 80

Butilove 16

Runaty 63

odstore 53

DATED September 14, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ James A. Karamanis

James A. Karamanis

Barney & Karamanis, LLP

Two Prudential Plaza

180 N. Stetson, Ste 3050

Chicago, IL 60601

Tel.: 312/553-5300

Attorney No. 6203479

James@bkchicagolaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF Ouyeinc Ltd.

Case: 1:20-cv-03490 Document #: 58 Filed: 09/14/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:253
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                           STATEMENT OF INCORPORATION
         ------------------                           --------------------------
         <S>                                          <C>
         KNOLOGY of Montgomery, Inc.                  Alabama
         KNOLOGY of Columbus, Inc.                    Delaware
         KNOLOGY of Panama City, Inc.                 Florida
         KNOLOGY of Augusta, Inc.                     Delaware
         KNOLOGY of Charleston, Inc.                  Delaware
         KNOLOGY of Alabama, Inc.                     Delaware
         KNOLOGY of Georgia, Inc.                     Delaware
         KNOLOGY of South Carolina, Inc.              Delaware
         KNOLOGY of Florida, Inc.                     Delaware
         KNOLOGY of Louisiana, Inc.                   Delaware
         KNOLOGY of Tennessee, Inc.                   Delaware
         KNOLOGY of Huntsville, Inc.                  Delaware
         KNOLOGY of Baton Rouge, Inc.                 Delaware

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Abbey A. Donaldson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/aadonald\/","title":"NASA Sets Coverage for Astronaut Loral O\u2019Hara, Crewmates Return","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"28GTqpYZbd\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-sets-coverage-for-astronaut-loral-ohara-crewmates-return\/\">NASA Sets Coverage for Astronaut Loral O\u2019Hara, Crewmates Return<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-sets-coverage-for-astronaut-loral-ohara-crewmates-return\/embed\/#?secret=28GTqpYZbd\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Sets Coverage for Astronaut Loral O\u2019Hara, Crewmates Return” — NASA\" data-secret=\"28GTqpYZbd\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/53336444473-3ee9ff6091-k.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
#### Ida and Laura C. Tucker, by, etc., *v.*Jefferson College, etc.

Deeds — Use, Created by — Failure—No Reverter.

If the use created by a deed of conveyance fails there will not be a reverter to the estate of the grantor.

APPEAL FROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT.

November 14, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

It is perfectly evident from the deed filed as an exhibit in this cause that the grantor, William A. Tucker, the father of appellants Ida and Laura C. Tucker, was not a donor of a charity, but the vendor of the land in fee for a full money consideration to him paid, as he recites in his deed, with a covenant of warranty against himself and all persons claiming under him.

Consequently, if there had been a use created by the deed, and it should wholly fail, there never could be a reverter of the estate to him or his heirs. *Gibson and Others v. Armstrong, etc., 7 B. Mon.*481.

But no use was created by the deed. The terms inserted therein, “for school purposes,” express the intention of and inducement with appellee to make the purchase, and are not used for the purpose of binding them for all or any particular length of time to dedicate the estate to that purpose alone.

As appellants were asserting some claim, thought future and contingent, to the land which might impair the vendible value of the estate, appellees had a right to have the cloud removed, and no available objection is presented to the mode adopted by the chancellor to effect the object.

*700
      *H. Pope, for appellants.*

*Duke & Richards, for appellees.*

This view of the case renders it unnecessary to decide the question raised by the motion to dismiss the appeal.

Judgment *affirmed.*
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 100 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        March 20, 1997.
    Resolved,  That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1122) to amend title 18, United States 
Code, to ban partial-birth abortions. The bill shall be considered as read for 
amendment. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to 
final passage without intervening motion except: (1) 2 hours of debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 913 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 913

  To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to provide greater 
                         planting flexibility.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 1997

 Mr. Combest (for himself, Mr. Stenholm, Mr. Thornberry, Mr. Lucas of 
  Oklahoma, Mr. Chambliss, and Mr. Edwards) introduced the following 
        bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to provide greater 
                         planting flexibility.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASED PLANTING FLEXIBILITY ON CONTRACT ACREAGE.

    Section 118(b)(2) of the Agricultural Market Transition Act (7 
U.S.C. 7218(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or''; at the end of subparagraph (B);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (C) 
        and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(D) on contract acreage following the failure of 
                a crop on that contract acreage due to conditions 
                beyond the control of the producer.''.
                                 <all>
```