alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lucius F. Rolfe, plaintiff, *vs.*C. M. Delmar, defendant.

1. The distribution of prizes by chance constitutes a lottery.

2. An employment to sell tickets in a foreign lottery is illegal, under the ■statute, (1 *M. S.*666, § 36,) and no action can arise out of it.

3. Even money advanced to an agent, by the managers of a 'lottery, to forward the sale of tickets by him, in this state, cannot be recovered back.

(Before Robertson, Ch. J. at special term.)

Heard March—, 1868;

decided April—, 1868.

Motion to vacate an order of arrest.

*J. F. Miller,*for the defendant and motion,

*W. W. Badger,*for the plaintiff, opposed.

Robertson, Ch. J.

The fact of the receipt of the money sued for, by the defendant in a fiduciary capacity* clearly appears by the affidavits, but the defendant sets up that the same was received for tickets sold in this city in a lottery to be drawn in Washington. A statute of this state (1 *R. S.*666, § 36) provides that every.“person within this state who shall * sell * to any person, any ticket or part or share of a ticket, or any * instrument purporting to be a * share of a ticket of any such lottery * not expressly authorized by law,” shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. This is held to extend to. foreign lotteries, *(People*v. *Sturdevant,*23 *Wend.*418; *Charles*v. *People,*1 *N. Y. Rep.*180,) and to the delivery of prizes not pecuniary, *(Governors of Almshouse*v. *Am. Art Union,*7 *N. Y. Rep.*228.) The defendant’s employment was therefore illegal, and no action can arise out of it. *DeGroot*v. *Van Buzer,*20 *Wend.*390.) It is true that the affidavits on the part of the plaintiffs show that the lottery authorized by law in the District of Columbia was for a *81noble purpose, connected with, a public entertainment, sanctioned by private persons and public officers of the highest position and respectability, favored by officials, and exempt from taxation, but they do not show that prizes were not distributed by chance; on the contrary they admit it in fact. Although the plaintiff* denies that it was a lottery, he is evidently mistaken, as the distribution of prizes by chance establishes the contrary.

As this is new matter set up by way of avoidance, it is incumbent on the plaintiff to make out a case to be submitted to a jury on the point, which he has not done. The sum of $250 advanced by the managing committee of the entertainment, appears to have been advanced also to forward the sale of tickets by the defendant, and must share the fate of their proceeds.

The order of arrest must be vacated, with $7 costs.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

OAKLEY, INC., 

 Plaintiff,

v.

ALL-INBIKE, et al.,

 Defendants.

Case No. 20-cv-03542

Judge Robert W. Gettleman

Magistrate Judge Young B. Kim

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL UNDER RULE 41(a)(1)

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. 

(“Plaintiff”) hereby dismisses this action with prejudice against the following Defendants:

Defendant Name Line No.

circle_plum 22

goodjob2016 25

Yaya boutique jewelry 49

Dated this 14th day of August 2020. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jake M. Christensen

Amy C. Ziegler

Justin R. Gaudio

Jake M. Christensen

Thomas J. Juettner

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500

Chicago, Illinois 60606

312.360.0080 / 312.360.9315 (facsimile)

aziegler@gbc.law

jgaudio@gbc.law

jchristensen@gbc.law

tjjuettner@gbc.law

Counsel for Plaintiff Oakley, Inc.

Case: 1:20-cv-03542 Document #: 46 Filed: 08/14/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:3423
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Flint Wild","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/flint-wildnasa-gov\/","title":"Former Astronaut Sally Ride","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"YWFyAkI36a\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sally-ride\/\">Former Astronaut Sally Ride<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sally-ride\/embed\/#?secret=YWFyAkI36a\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Former Astronaut Sally Ride” — NASA\" data-secret=\"YWFyAkI36a\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

The undersigned officerof WII Components, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2008 to which this certification is beingfurnished as an exhibit (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended (the “ExchangeAct”), and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

This certification isprovided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) ofRegulation S-K (“Item601(b)(32) ”) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification(A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shallnot be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Companyspecifically incorporates it by reference.

 
| Date: March 31, 2009 |                                                      |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | /s/ Dale B. Herbst                                        |   |
|                      | Name: Dale B. Herbst                                      |
|                      | Title: Chief Financial  Officer, Treasurer, and Secretary |

 

 

----
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 25

Designating membership on certain standing committees of the House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 9, 1997

Mr. ARMEY submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating membership on certain standing committees of

the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Members be, and

2 they are hereby, elected to the following standing commit3 tees:

4 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE: Mr. Sensenbrenner, Chair5 man.

6 COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Mr. Talent,

7 Chairman.

8 COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS: Mr. Stump,

9 Chairman.

Æ
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

LAMAR WARD, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1263

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed March 13, 2019. 

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; William D. Sites, Judge. 

Lamar Ward, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KELLY, MORRIS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 319 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     November 12, 1997.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill (S. 
738) to reform the statutes relating to Amtrak, to authorize appropriations for 
Amtrak, and for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as read for 
amendment. The amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted. All points of order 
against the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, which 
shall be equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure; and (2) one motion 
to commit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03758

Honorable Thomas M. Durkin

Long Leaf Trading Group, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, March 12, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: The parties have

requested that the Court modify the 2/16/2021 scheduling order [18]. The 5/1/2021 fact

discovery deadline and expert discovery deadline is extended to 6/30/2021. The 4/5/2021

telephone status hearing is reset for 7/1/2021 at 9:00 a.m. To join the telephone

conference, dial 877−402−9757, Access Code 4410831. Members of the public and media

will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. Please be sure to keep your phone on mute

when you are not speaking. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of

the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court

proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of

court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future

hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice. (ecw, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 65 Filed: 03/12/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:502
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 991 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 991

    To amend the Railway Labor Act concerning the applicability of 
requirements of that Act to United States air carriers and flight deck 
     crews engaged in flight operations outside the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 1997

    Mr. Rahall, for himself (Mr. Oberstar, Mr. Young of Alaska, Mr. 
Lipinski, Mr. Borski, Mr. Petri, Mr. Mascara, Mr. Nadler, Mr. DeFazio, 
 Mr. LaTourette, Mr. Traficant, Mr. Quinn, Mr. Boehlert, Mr. Costello, 
Mr. Filner, Mr. Solomon, and Mr. LaHood) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Railway Labor Act concerning the applicability of 
requirements of that Act to United States air carriers and flight deck 
     crews engaged in flight operations outside the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPLICABILITY OF RAILWAY LABOR ACT PROVISIONS TO AIR 
              CARRIERS AND FLIGHT DECK CREWS OPERATING OUTSIDE THE 
              UNITED STATES.

    (a) Foreign Commerce.--Section 201 of the Railway Labor Act (45 
U.S.C. 181) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``As used in 
this title, the term `foreign commerce' includes flight operations 
(excluding ground operations performed by persons other than flight 
deck crew members) conducted in whole or in part outside the United 
States (as defined by section 40102(a)(41) of title 49, United States 
Code) by an air carrier (as defined by section 40102(a)(2) of such 
title).''.
    (b) Employee.--Section 202 of such Act (45 U.S.C. 182) is amended 
by adding at the end the following: ``As used in this title, the term 
`employee' also includes flight deck crew members employed by an air 
carrier (as defined by section 40102(a)(2) of title 49, United States 
Code) while such flight deck crew members perform work in whole or in 
part outside the United States (as defined by section 40102(a)(41) of 
such title).''.
                                 <all>
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00621-CV

Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation, Appellant

v.

Insurance Council of Texas, Service Lloyds Insurance Company, 

and Old Republic General Insurance Group, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 250TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. GN501097, HONORABLE DARLENE BYRNE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant filed an agreed motion to dismiss this interlocutory appeal. We grant the

motion and dismiss this appeal.

 

G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Justices B. A. Smith, Puryear and Waldrop

Dismissed on Agreed Motion

Filed: February 10, 2006
9238.

#### Hufstetler *v.*Parker.

Decided March 13, 1918.

Luke, J.

This case is here upon the overruling of a motion for a new trial, based upon general grounds'only. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment- affirmed.*

*Wade, O. J., and, Jenkins, J., concur.*

*26Appeal; from Murray' superior court—Judge Tarver. September 8, 1917.

*II. II. Anderson,*for plaintiff in error. *King & Starr,*contra.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 67185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26703]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLCAD01000 L12100000.MD 0000 15XL1109AF]


Meeting of the California Desert District Advisory Council

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, in accordance with Public Laws 92-463 
and 94-579, that the California Desert District Advisory Council (DAC) 
to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Department of the 
Interior, will participate in a field tour of BLM-administered public 
lands on Friday, December 5, 2014, from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and will 
meet in formal session on Saturday, December 6, 2014, from 8:00 a.m. to 
4:30 p.m. in Palm Springs, CA. Exact meeting location is yet to be 
determined. Agenda for the Saturday meeting will include updates by 
council members, the BLM California Desert District Manager, five Field 
Managers, and council subgroups. Final agenda items for the field trip, 
public meeting, and meeting location will be posted on the DAC Web page 
at http://www.blm.gov/ca/st/en/info/rac/dac.html when finalized.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All DAC meetings are open to the public. 
Public comment for items not on the agenda will be scheduled at the 
beginning of the meeting Saturday morning. Time for public comment is 
made available by the council chairman during the presentation of 
various agenda items, and is scheduled at the end of the meeting for 
topics not on the agenda.
    While the Saturday meeting is tentatively scheduled from 8:00 a.m. 
to 4:30 p.m., the meeting could conclude prior to 4:30 p.m. should the 
council conclude its presentations and discussions. Therefore, members 
of the public interested in a particular agenda item or discussion 
should schedule their arrival accordingly.
    Written comments may be filed in advance of the meeting for the 
California Desert District Advisory Council, c/o Bureau of Land 
Management, External Affairs, 22835 Calle San Juan de Los Lagos, Moreno 
Valley, CA 92553. Written comments also are accepted at the time of the 
meeting and, if copies are provided to the recorder, will be 
incorporated into the minutes.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Razo, BLM California Desert 
District External Affairs, (951) 697-5217.

    Dated: October 27, 2014.
Teresa A. Raml,
California Desert District Manager.
[FR Doc. 2014-26703 Filed 11-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Bruce BARKSDALE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 78-2582.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 15, 1980.

John Wilson Reed, New Orleans, La. (Court-appointed), for petitioner-appellant.

Maurine Carroll, William F. Wessel, Asst. Dist. Attys., New Orleans, La., John S. Baker, Jr., Baton Rouge, La., for respondentappellee.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion Jan. 21, 1980, 5 Cir., 1980, 610 F.2d 253).

Before COLEMAN, Chief Judge, BROWN, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, CHARLES CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, VANCE, KARVITCH, FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., GARZA, HENDERSON, REAVLEY, POLITZ, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON and THOMAS A. CLARK, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc.

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Pan Am Financial Corp (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Guillermo Bron certifies in his capacity as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that to his knowledge: 

 

(a) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 

 

(b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto signed this Certification asof May 12, 2004.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 6, 2023

No. 04-22-00608-CV

INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, Robert Medina, and Phillip Quintanilla,

Appellants

v.

Robert SANCHEZ,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CI17334

Honorable Nicole Garza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant has filed an Unopposed Motion to Stay Pending Settlement, stating that the 

parties have settled the issues between them and are preparing the necessary documentation. We 

GRANT appellant’s motion to stay. Deadlines in this appeal are suspended until March 1, 2023.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of January, 2023.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
#### M. Kane et al. *v.*Geo. W. Adams et al.

Fraudulent Conveyance — Mortgage to Prefer Creditor — Assignment Under Act of 1856.

As the debts of the appellees existed before the execution of the mortgage, the allegation in the answer that appellants were about to attach the' property of Kane and that the mortgage was given to prevent them from taking such proceedings to secure their debt was not sufficient, therefore the demurrer was properly sustained.

APPEAL PROM SHELBY CIRCUIT COURT.

September 8, 1871.

*Caldwell & Harwood, for appellants.*

*Bullock & Davis, for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay :

The execution of the mortgage by Kane to his co-appellants not only evidenced an intention on his part to prefer the mortgagees to the rest of his creditors but actually had that effect unless the judgment of the circuit court shall be upheld.

The mortgagees in their answer claim that they were about to attach the property of Kane, and that the mortgage was given to prevent them from taking such proceedings to secure their debts. Kane was not a non-resident of the state, hence if there existed any ground for their contemplated attachments, it must have been of a nature indicating an intention upon his part to avoid the payment of his debts by some fraudulent disposition of his property. Such a disposition of property is always made in contemplation of insolvency.

The mortgagees recognizing this fact attempted to secure themselves by their mortgage. We aré of the opinion that the state of facts developed by the record brings this case within the operation of the act of 1856, and hence that the demurrers to said answers were properly sustained. The petitions sufficiently allege that the debts of the appellees existed before the execution of the mortgage. The judgment appealed from is affirmed.