1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

TRINETTE G. KENT (State Bar No. 025180)

10645 North Tatum Blvd., Suite 200-192

Phoenix, AZ 85028 

Telephone: (480) 247-9644

Facsimile: (480) 717-4781

E-mail: tkent@kentlawpc.com

Of Counsel to:

Nitzkin & Associates

22142 West Nine Mile Road

Southfield, MI 48033

Telephone: (248) 353-2882

Facsimile: (248) 353-4840

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

David DiPiazza

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

David DiPiazza,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Experian Information Solutions, Inc., 

an Ohio corporation.

Defendant.

Case No.: 

COMPLAINT

JURY TRIAL DEMAND

Case 2:16-cv-00368-GMS Document 1 Filed 02/10/16 Page 1 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

NOW COMES THE PLAINTIFF, DAVID DIPIAZZA, BY AND THROUGH 

COUNSEL, TRINETTE G. KENT, and for his Complaint against the Defendant, 

pleads as follows:

JURISDICTION

1. Jurisdiction of this court arises under 15 U.S.C. §1681p, 15 U.S.C. §1692k(d) 

and 28 U.S.C. §§1331,1337.

2. This is an action brought by a consumer for violation of the Fair Credit 

Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. §1681, et seq. [hereinafter “FCRA”]).

VENUE

3. The transactions and occurrences which give rise to this action occurred in the 

City of Scottsdale, Maricopa County, Arizona. 

4. Venue is proper in the District of Arizona, Phoenix Division. 

PARTIES

5. The Defendant to this lawsuit is Experian Information Solutions, Inc. 

(“Experian”), which is an Ohio company that maintains a registered agent in 

Maricopa County, Arizona.

Case 2:16-cv-00368-GMS Document 1 Filed 02/10/16 Page 2 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

GENERAL ALLEGATIONS

6. Sometime before December 22, 2014, Plaintiff obtained his Experian credit file 

and noticed inaccuracies on the following trade lines (“Errant Trade Lines”):

a. Bureau of Medical Economics, Account Number: 162XXXX;

b. Chase, Account Number: 58889622XXXX;

c. Capio, Account Number: 44XXXX;

d. Consumer Recovery, Account Number: D596XXXX;

e. DTE Energy, Account Number: 117527XXXX;

f. DTE Energy, Account Number: 11752700XXXX; 

g. DTE Energy, Account Number: 11752700XXXX;

h. Ingram Cnty Recorder of Deeds, Account Number: 

SQ2013046542XXXX;

i. Mcydsnb, Account Number: 438081808XXXX;

j. State of Mi Office Chi, Account Number: 

5020090065097473324997473XXXX;

k. State of Mi Office Chi, Account Number: 

502010005793974733249987473XXXX;

l. State Farm Fncl Svcs, Account Number: 85322264190XXXX;

m. Stellar Rec, Account Number: 9555XXXX;

n. SYNCB Sams Club, Account Number: 77141203XXXX; and

o. US Bkpt Ct East Dist MI, Case Number: 0953317WS.

7. On or about December 22, 2014, Mr. DiPiazza submitted a letter to Experian,

disputing the Errant Trade Lines.

8. On or about February 4, 2015, Mr. DiPiazza received a letter from Experian,

stating that it received a suspicious request and determined that it was not sent 

by Mr. DiPiazza. Experian stated that it would not be initiating any disputes 

based on the suspicious correspondence and that it would apply this same 

policy to any future suspicious requests that it received.

Case 2:16-cv-00368-GMS Document 1 Filed 02/10/16 Page 3 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4

9. Experian refused to investigate Mr. DiPiazza’s dispute, in violation of the Fair 

Credit Reporting Act. 

COUNT I

NEGLIGENT VIOLATION OF THE FAIR CREDIT REPORTING ACT

BY EXPERIAN

10.Plaintiff realleges the above paragraphs as if recited verbatim.

11.Defendant Experian prepared, compiled, issued, assembled, transferred, 

published, and otherwise reproduced consumer reports regarding Mr. DiPiazza 

as that term is defined in 15 USC 1681a.

12.Such reports contained information about Mr. DiPiazza that was false, 

misleading, and inaccurate.

13.Experian negligently failed to maintain and/or follow reasonable procedures to 

assure maximum possible accuracy of the information it reported to one or 

more third parties pertaining to Mr. DiPiazza, in violation of 15 USC 1681e(b).

14. After receiving Mr. DiPiazza’s consumer dispute to the Errant Trade Lines, 

Experian negligently failed to conduct a reasonable reinvestigation as required 

by 15 U.S.C. 1681i.

15.As a direct and proximate cause of Experian’s negligent failure to perform its 

duties under the FCRA, Mr. DiPiazza has suffered actual damages, mental 

anguish and suffering, humiliation, and embarrassment.

Case 2:16-cv-00368-GMS Document 1 Filed 02/10/16 Page 4 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5

16.Experian is liable to Mr. DiPiazza by reason of its violation of the FCRA in an 

amount to be determined by the trier fact together with his reasonable attorneys’ 

fees pursuant to 15 USC 1681o. 

WHEREFORE, PLAINTIFF PRAYS that this court grant him a judgment 

against Experian for actual damages, costs, interest, and attorneys’ fees. 

COUNT II

WILLFUL VIOLATION OF THE FAIR CREDIT REPORTING ACT

BY EXPERIAN

17.Plaintiff realleges the above paragraphs as if recited verbatim.

18.Defendant Experian prepared, compiled, issued, assembled, transferred, 

published, and otherwise reproduced consumer reports regarding Mr. DiPiazza 

as that term is defined in 15 USC 1681a.

19.Such reports contained information about Mr. DiPiazza that was false, 

misleading, and inaccurate.

20.Experian willfully failed to maintain and/or follow reasonable procedures to 

assure maximum possible accuracy of the information that it reported to one or 

more third parties pertaining to Mr. DiPiazza, in violation of 15 USC 1681e(b).

21. After receiving Mr. DiPiazza’s consumer dispute to the Errant Trade Lines, 

Experian willfully failed to conduct a reasonable reinvestigation as required by 

15 U.S.C. 1681i.

Case 2:16-cv-00368-GMS Document 1 Filed 02/10/16 Page 5 of 6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

6

22.As a direct and proximate cause of Experian’s willful failure to perform its 

duties under the FCRA, Mr. DiPiazza has suffered actual damages, mental 

anguish and suffering, humiliation, and embarrassment.

23.Experian is liable to Mr. DiPiazza by reason of its violations of the FCRA in an 

amount to be determined by the trier of fact together with his reasonable 

attorneys’ fees pursuant to 15 USC 1681n. 

WHEREFORE, PLAINTIFF PRAYS that this court grant him a judgment 

against Experian for the greater of statutory or actual damages, plus punitive damages, 

along with costs, interest, and attorneys’ fees. 

JURY DEMAND

Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by Jury. 

DATED: December 22, 2015 NITZKIN & ASSOCIATES

By: /s/ Trinette G. Kent 

Trinette G. Kent

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

David DiPiazza 

Case 2:16-cv-00368-GMS Document 1 Filed 02/10/16 Page 6 of 6