alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

House Calendar No. 143

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 349

[Report No. 105–414]

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 1575) to rename the Washington

National Airport located in the District of Columbia and Virginia as

the ‘‘Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1998

Mr. SOLOMON, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 1575) to rename

the Washington National Airport located in the District

of Columbia and Virginia as the ‘‘Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport’’.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (S.

3 1575) to rename the Washington National Airport located

4 in the District of Columbia and Virginia as the ‘‘Ronald

5 Reagan Washington National Airport’’. The bill shall be

6 considered as read for amendment. The previous question
2

HRES 349 RH

1 shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage

2 without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate

3 equally divided and controlled by the chairman and rank4 ing minority member of the Committee on Transportation

5 and Infrastructure; and (2) one motion to recommit.

House Calendar No. 143

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 349

[Report No. 105–414]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 1575) to

‘‘Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport’’.in the District of Columbia and Virginia as therename the Washington National Airport located

FEBRUARY 4, 1998

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
Exhibit 10.76


 


Agreement


 


To:
Mike Heather


 


From:
Jacob Y. Terner


 


Re: Engagement of Mike Heather as Chief Financial
Officer of Prospect Medical Holdings, Inc. (PMHI) or the Company.


 


I.                                         This document confirms that Mike Heather has
accepted the position of CFO of PMHI. The engagement will commence on
April 19, 2004 and continue for a minimum of one year.


 


II.                                     Heather’s compensation has been agreed on to
be:


 


A.           A salary of $180,000 per annum plus any of
the standard corporate benefits he chooses to use.


 


B.             Three hundred thousand (300,000) options to
purchase the common shares of PMHI@ a price of $5.00 per share.


 


1.               100,000 of these options will vest
immediately.


 


2.               The balance will vest at the rate of 8,333
options for 24 months starting with the first day of his thirteenth (13) month
of employment and continue as long as Heather remains employed by the Company.


 


C.             For example if Heather is employed by the
Company for fourteen (14) months and does not complete a fifteenth (15) month
of employment, he would have received the one hundred thousand (100,000)
options as in “B.l” above and sixteen thousand six hundred sixty six (16,666)
options for two full months of employment in a second year.


 


1.               All options will be exercisable for three (3)
years following termination of Heathers employment with the Company.


 


 


	
   

  	
  /s/
  Jacob Y. Terner

  	
   

  	
  4/8/04

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Jacob
  Y. Terner, M.D. , CEO PMHI

  	
  Date

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/
  Mike Heather

  	
   

  	
  4/8/04

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Mike
  Heather

  	
  Date
#### ONSLOW COUNTY, Plaintiff v. GUY J. PHILLIPS, and wife, LYNDA A. PHILLIPS, and any heirs, assigns or devisees of GUY J. PHILLIPS and wife, LYNDA A. PHILLIPS, or any other person or entity claiming thereunder, Defendants *&*BETTY M. RUSSELL, ALEX WARLICK, JR., Trustee, NCNB NATIONAL BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA now NATIONSBANK, MARSHALL F. DOTSON, JR., Trustee, Lienholders. ONSLOW COUNTY, Plaintiff v. GUY J. PHILLIPS, and wife, LYNDA A. PHILLIPS, and any heirs, assigns or devisees of GUY J. PHILLIPS, and wife, LYNDA A. PHILLIPS, or any other person or entity claiming thereunder, Defendants ONSLOW COUNTY, Plaintiff v. GUY J. PHILLIPS, and wife, LYNDA A. PHILLIPS, and any heirs, assigns or devisees of GUY J. PHILLIPS, and wife, LYNDA A. PHILLIPS, or any other person or entity claiming thereunder, Defendants, & NCNB NATIONAL BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA now NATIONSBANK, MARSHALL F. DOTSON, JR., Trustee, Lienholders ONSLOW COUNTY, Plaintiff v. GUY J. PHILLIPS and wife, LYNDA A. PHILLIPS, and any heirs, assigns or devisees of GUY J. PHILLIPS, and wife, LYNDA A. PHILLIPS, or any other person or entity claiming thereunder, Defendants

No. 385A96

(Filed 6 June 1997)

Appeal by plaintiff pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 123 N.C. App. 317, 473 S.E. 2d 643 (1996), which affirmed in part and reversed in part, and remanded an order entered by Wainwright, J., on 9 February 1995 in Superior Court, Onslow County. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 May 1997.

*Roger A. Moore for plaintiff-appellant.*

*Jeffrey S. Miller for defendant-appellees.*

*North Carolina Association of County Commissioners, by Lesley F. Moxley, Assistant Durham County Attorney; James B. Blackburn, III, General Counsel; and Kimberly M. Grantham, Assistant General Counsel, amicus curiae.*

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs right of appeal arises from an opinion of Judge Walker concurring in part and dissenting in part from the majority opinion in the Court of Appeals. The sole issue before this Court by virtue of Judge Walker’s dissent is whether the majority of the panel *266in the Court of Appeals erred in that part of its opinion holding that the plaintiff was not entitled to summary judgment on defendants’ counterclaim for violation of defendants’ constitutional rights. For the reasons stated in the concurring and dissenting opinion of Judge Walker, we conclude that the majority did err in this regard, and accordingly, we reverse that part of the opinion of the majority below. Judge Walker concurred with the majority as to the other issues in its opinion in the Court of Appeals, and those issues are not before us. Therefore, as to those issues, the decision of the Court of Appeals remains in effect.

For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed in part, and this case is remanded to that court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
H. Res. 120

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 17, 1997.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and

that they are hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Mr. Holden and Mr. Lampson.

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE: Mrs. Tauscher.

COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: Mr. Davis

of Florida.

COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL SECURITY: Mr. Rodriguez.

COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES: Mr. Doggett.

COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVERSIGHT: Mr. Ford.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Blue Cross And Blue Shield Association

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03543

Honorable Joan B. Gottschall

Jazz Pharmaceuticals PLC, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, July 14, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Plaintiff's notice [6],

titled "Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Plaintiff Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i)," states that plaintiff "voluntarily dismisses itself

from the above−captioned litigation." It is not completely clear whether plaintiff means to

dismiss this case in its entirety, as Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) provides, or to dismiss

itself as a party plaintiff and leave this putative class action pending. Absent

communication to the contrary from plaintiff on or before July 16, 2020, this court will

assume that plaintiff intends to dismiss this action in its entirety, and this case will be

dismissed without prejudice and without further court order effective July 17, 2020.

Mailed notice(mjc, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03543 Document #: 7 Filed: 07/14/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:151
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated March 5, 2007, accompanying
the consolidated financial statements of QC Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of
said report in the Registration Statement of QC Holdings, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-119167, effective September 21, 2004).



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Kansas City, Missouri

March 5, 2007
Cite as 2022 Ark. 188

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

IN RE ARKANSAS CONTINUING LEGAL 

EDUCATION BOARD

Opinion Delivered: October 20, 2022

PER CURIAM

Kelsey Bardwell of Harrison is reappointed to the Continuing Legal Education Board 

for a three-year term to expire on October 20, 2025. Ms. Bardwell is an at-large 

representative.

The Honorable Tjuana Byrd of Little Rock is reappointed to the Continuing Legal 

Education Board for a three-year term to expire on October 20, 2025. Judge Byrd is an atlarge representative.

Amber Wilson Bagley of Little Rock is reappointed to the Continuing Legal 

Education Board for a three-year term to expire on October 20, 2025. Ms. Bagley represents 

the Second Congressional District.

The court extends its sincere appreciation to Ms. Bardwell, Judge Byrd, and Ms. 

Bagley for accepting reappointment to this important board.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



              In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of B&G Foods,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the  period  ending  July 3, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert
C. Cantwell,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:

              (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

              (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Robert C. Cantwell
-----------------------
Robert C. Cantwell
Chief Financial Officer
July 22, 2004
EXHIBIT A

Case: 1:20-cv-03088 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/25/20 Page 1 of 21 PageID #:12
Case: 1:20-cv-03088 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/25/20 Page 2 of 21 PageID #:13
Case: 1:20-cv-03088 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/25/20 Page 3 of 21 PageID #:14
Case: 1:20-cv-03088 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/25/20 Page 4 of 21 PageID #:15
Case: 1:20-cv-03088 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/25/20 Page 5 of 21 PageID #:16
Case: 1:20-cv-03088 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/25/20 Page 6 of 21 PageID #:17
Case: 1:20-cv-03088 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/25/20 Page 7 of 21 PageID #:18
Case: 1:20-cv-03088 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/25/20 Page 8 of 21 PageID #:19
Case: 1:20-cv-03088 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/25/20 Page 9 of 21 PageID #:20
Case: 1:20-cv-03088 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/25/20 Page 10 of 21 PageID #:21
Case: 1:20-cv-03088 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/25/20 Page 11 of 21 PageID #:22
Case: 1:20-cv-03088 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/25/20 Page 12 of 21 PageID #:23
Case: 1:20-cv-03088 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/25/20 Page 13 of 21 PageID #:24
Case: 1:20-cv-03088 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/25/20 Page 14 of 21 PageID #:25
Case: 1:20-cv-03088 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/25/20 Page 15 of 21 PageID #:26
Case: 1:20-cv-03088 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/25/20 Page 16 of 21 PageID #:27
Case: 1:20-cv-03088 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/25/20 Page 17 of 21 PageID #:28
Case: 1:20-cv-03088 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/25/20 Page 18 of 21 PageID #:29
Case: 1:20-cv-03088 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/25/20 Page 19 of 21 PageID #:30
Case: 1:20-cv-03088 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/25/20 Page 20 of 21 PageID #:31
Case: 1:20-cv-03088 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/25/20 Page 21 of 21 PageID #:32
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

HYDRAFLOW INDUSTRIES LIMITED, 

Plaintiff,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”,

Defendants.

Civil Action No.: 1:20-cv-03661

Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman

Magistrate Judge Susan E. Cox

SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, a judgment was entered in the above action on January 8, 2019 [51] in favor 

of Plaintiffs and against the Defendants Identified in Amended Schedule A. Plaintiffs acknowledge 

payment of an agreed upon damages amount, costs, and interest and desires to release this 

judgment and hereby fully and completely satisfy the same as to the following Defendants:

NO. DEFENDANT

58 Besttops

71 Rtic

67 Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

THEREFORE, full and complete satisfaction of said judgment as to above identified Defendants 

is hereby acknowledged, and the Clerk of the Court is hereby authorized and directed to make an 

entry of the full and complete satisfaction on the docket of said judgment.

Case: 1:20-cv-03661 Document #: 58 Filed: 10/27/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:1328
DA TED: October 23, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 

Yanling Jiang (Bar No. 6309336) 

JiangIP LLC 

111 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 1700

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Telephone: 312-675-6297

Email: yanling@jiangip.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Subscribed and sworn before me by Yanling Jiang, on this 23rd of October, 2020.

Given under by hand and notarial seal. 

MICHAEL SEVERT 

Official Seal 

1 Notary Public • State of Illinois 

, My Commis sion Expires Sep 11, 2023 

Notary Public 

State of :tl ---------

County of 

Case: 1:20-cv-03661 Document #: 58 Filed: 10/27/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:1329
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 /s/ William J. Sims

William J. SimsChief Executive Officer/s/ David K. Johnson

David K. JohnsonChief Financial Officer
#### Lew A. Satz, Appellant, *v.*Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

December 18, 1925.

Insurance — burglary insurance — warranties may be avoided by proof that insurer knew actual facts — Insurance Law, § 68, limited to life insurance policies.

Warranties on a policy of burglary insurance may be avoided by proof that the insurer knew the actual facts when the policy was written and that the facts were such that the warranties could not be true.

Section 58 of the Insurance Law, providing that in the absence of fraud all statements purporting to be made by the insured shall be deemed representations and not warranties, is limited in its application to life insurance policies.

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the City Court of the City of New York granting defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and from the judgment entered thereon.

*Alfred B. Nathan,*for the appellant.

*Rifkind & Reilly [Albert J. Rifkind*and *Thomas T. Reilly*of counsel], for the respondent.

Churchill, J.

The single question presented by the appeal is whether warranties on a policy of burglary insurance may be avoided by proof that the insurer knew the actual facts when the policy was written and that the facts Were such that the *200warranties could not be true. It was held below that such knowledge on the part of the insurer is immaterial and hence that the defendant was entitled to judgment, the falsity of the warranties being admitted.

We disagree with the conclusions so reached. The contrary principle appears to be established by numerous decisions. *(Van Schoick*v. *Niagara Fire Ins. Co.,*68 N. Y. 434; *Robbins*v. *Springfield Fire Ins. Co.,*149 id. 477; *Forward*v. *Continental Ins. Co.,*142 id. 382; *Lewis*v. *Guardian Fire & Life Assur. Co.,*181 id. 392; *New York, etc., Assn.*v. *Westchester Fire Ins. Co.,*110 App. Div. 760; affd., 189 *N.*Y. 525; *McClelland*v. *Mutual Life Ins. Co., 217*id. 336; *Thebaud*v. *Great Western Ins. Co.,*84 Hun, 1; affd., 155 N. Y. 516.)

The opposite result has been reached in actions against life: insurance companies upon policies written since the enactment of.' section 58 of the Insurance Law. *(Bollard*v. *N. Y. Life Ins. Co.,,*228 N. Y. 521; *Stanulevich*v. *St. Lawrence Life Assn.,*Id. 586; *Grubiak*v. *John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.,*212 App. Div. 126.) But' the cases first cited have not been overruled and the statute only applies to life insurance policies. *(Baumann*v. *Preferred Accident Ins. Co.,*225 N. Y. 480.)

The order and judgment must be reversed, with costs,, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

All concur; present, Burro, Levy and Churchill, JJ.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Flight Control Math 5 (Finding the Equation of a Line and the Point of Intersection for Two Lines)","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"QWWGdWUBZJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/flight-control-math-5-finding-the-equation-of-a-line-and-the-point-of-intersection-for-two-lines\/\">Flight Control Math 5 (Finding the Equation of a Line and the Point of Intersection for Two Lines)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/flight-control-math-5-finding-the-equation-of-a-line-and-the-point-of-intersection-for-two-lines\/embed\/#?secret=QWWGdWUBZJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Flight Control Math 5 (Finding the Equation of a Line and the Point of Intersection for Two Lines)” — NASA\" data-secret=\"QWWGdWUBZJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/flight-control-math-5.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 738

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the Public Health

Service Act with respect to myelogram-related arachnoiditis.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 12, 1997

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and

the Public Health Service Act with respect to myelogramrelated arachnoiditis.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Myelogram-Related

5 Arachnoiditis Amendments of 1997’’.

6 SEC. 2. ADULTERATED MYELOGRAMS.

7 Section 501 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic

8 Act (21 U.S.C. 351) is amended by adding at the end the

9 following:
2

•HR 738 IH

1 ‘‘(j) If it is a myelogram involving the use of

2 Pantopaque, Amipaque, Omipacque, or Isovue.’’.

3 SEC. 3. MYELOGRAM-RELATED ARACHNOIDITIS; ACTIVI4 TIES OF NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEURO5 LOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE.

6 Subpart 10 of part C of title IV of the Public Health

7 Service Act (42 U.S.C. 285j et seq.) is amended by adding

8 at the end the following section:

9 ‘‘MYELOGRAM-RELATED ARACHNOIDITIS

10 ‘‘SEC. 460A. With respect to individuals who have

11 undergone the diagnostic procedure known as a

12 myelogram and who have subsequently developed cases of

13 arachnoiditis, the Director of the Institute shall—

14 ‘‘(1) conduct or support a study to develop an

15 estimate of the number of such individuals in the

16 United States;

17 ‘‘(2) conduct or support research to determine

18 the extent to which such cases are associated with

19 the use of such procedure; and

20 ‘‘(3) conduct or support research on treatments

21 for such cases in such individuals, including treat22 ments to manage pain.’’.

Æ
_________________________________________ 

 

_________________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129337 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, IN RE PETITION BY TREASURER OF Justices 

WAYNE COUNTY FOR FORECLOSURE 

WAYNE COUNTY TREASURER,

Petitioner,

and 

MICHAEL KELLY,

Intervening Party-Appellant, 

v SC: 129337 

 COA: 261071 
 Wayne CC: 02-220192-PZ

FULL GOSPEL OPENDOOR ASSEMBLIES, 

INC., 

Respondent-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of February 24, 2006, the application for leave to appeal the July 11, 

2005 order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in Wayne 

County Treasurer v Perfecting Church (In re Petition by Treasurer of Wayne County for 

Foreclosure) (Docket No. 129341). On order of the Court, the case having been decided 

on May 23, 2007, 478 Mich 1 (2007), the application is again considered, and it is 

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed 

by this Court. 

d0723 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 30, 2007 

 Clerk