alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Nutty Balloon Noisemaker","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SyNq4wsu9Q\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/nutty-balloon-noisemaker\/\">Nutty Balloon Noisemaker<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/nutty-balloon-noisemaker\/embed\/#?secret=SyNq4wsu9Q\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Nutty Balloon Noisemaker” — NASA\" data-secret=\"SyNq4wsu9Q\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/ah_nutty_noisemaker_0.jpg?w=320","thumbnail_width":320,"thumbnail_height":320}
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Pan Am Financial Corp (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for theperiod ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Garland Koch certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of the Company,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that to his knowledge: 

 

(a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 

 

(b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto signed this Certification as of November 24, 2004.
65298 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 212 / Monday, November 3, 2014 / Notices 

S.P No. Applicant Regulation(s) Nature of special permit thereof 

14924–M ...... Demex International Inc., Picayune, MS.49 CFR 176.144(e), 

176.145(b), 176.137(b)(7), 

176.63(e), 176.83; 

176.116(e); 176.120; 

176.138(b); 176.164(e); 

176.178(b).

To modify the special permit by adding an additional Division 

1.1D material. (mode 3) 

DENIED 

16211–N ....... Request by East Penn Manufacturing Company Inc. Lyon Station, PA September 10, 2014. To authorize the transportation in 

commerce of lead acid batteries that weigh up to 75 kg as materials of trade. 

15747–M ...... Request by UPS, Inc. Atlanta, GA September 18, 2014. To authorize alternative marking of trailer numbers. 

16244–N ....... Cobham, Westminster, MD ..... 49 CFR Parts 106, 107, 171– 

180, ISO 11119–2.

Special Permit (SP) for the manufacturing, mark, sale and 

use of Carbon and Glass fiber reinforced, aluminum lined 

composite pressure vessels, rated up to 7500 psi service 

pressure. (modes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) 

[FR Doc. 2014–25168 Filed 10–31–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4909–60–M 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Saint Lawrence Seaway Development 

Corporation 

Advisory Board; Notice of Meeting 

Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. 

L. 92–463; 5 U.S.C. App. I), notice is 

hereby given of a meeting of the 

Advisory Board of the Saint Lawrence 

Seaway Development Corporation 

(SLSDC), to be held from 9:00 a.m. to 

11:00 a.m. (EDT) on Thursday, 

December 4, 2014 via conference call. 

The agenda for this meeting will be as 

follows: Opening Remarks; 

Consideration of Minutes of Past 

Meeting; Quarterly Report; Old and New 

Business; Closing Discussion; 

Adjournment. 

Attendance at the meeting is open to 

the interested public but limited to the 

space available. With the approval of 

the Administrator, members of the 

public may present oral statements at 

the meeting. Persons wishing further 

information should contact, not later 

than Friday, November 28, 2014, Anita 

K. Blackman, Senior Advisor to the 

Administrator, Saint Lawrence Seaway 

Development Corporation, 1200 New 

Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 

20590; 202–366–0091. 

Any member of the public may 

present a written statement to the 

Advisory Board at any time. 

Issued at Washington, DC, on October 28, 

2014. 

Carrie Lavigne, 

Chief Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2014–25993 Filed 10–31–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–61–P 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
CFTC Ex. 296

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 81-5 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1747
296

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 81-5 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:1748
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 81-5 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:1749
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

OAKLEY, INC., 

 Plaintiff,

v.

ALL-INBIKE, et al.,

 Defendants.

Case No. 20-cv-03542

Judge Robert W. Gettleman

Magistrate Judge Young B. Kim

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL UNDER RULE 41(a)(1)

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. 

(“Plaintiff”) hereby dismisses this action without prejudice against the following Defendant:

Defendant Name Line No.

meng_2018 27

Dated this 14th day of July 2020. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jake M. Christensen

Amy C. Ziegler

Justin R. Gaudio

Jake M. Christensen

Thomas J. Juettner

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500

Chicago, Illinois 60606

312.360.0080 / 312.360.9315 (facsimile)

aziegler@gbc.law

jgaudio@gbc.law

jchristensen@gbc.law

tjjuettner@gbc.law

Counsel for Plaintiff Oakley, Inc.

Case: 1:20-cv-03542 Document #: 44 Filed: 07/14/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:3421
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 306 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 129
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 306

                          [Report No. 105-384]

    Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                     Rules, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 5, 1997

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                     Rules, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI for a two-
thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported from that committee before November 10, 1997, 
providing for consideration or disposition of any of the following:
            (1) A bill or joint resolution making general 
        appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1998, 
        any amendment thereto, any conference report thereon, or any 
        amendment reported in disagreement from a conference thereon.
            (2) A bill or joint resolution that includes provisions 
        making continuing appropriations for fiscal year 1998, any 
        amendment thereto, any conference report thereon, or any 
        amendment reported in disagreement from a conference thereon.
    Sec. 2. It shall be in order at any time before November 10, 1997, 
for the Speaker to entertain motions to suspend the rules, provided 
that the object of any such motion is announced from the floor at least 
one hour before the motion is offered. In scheduling the consideration 
of legislation under this authority, the Speaker or his designee shall 
consult with the minority leader or his designee.
                                     

                                                 House Calendar No. 129

105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 306

                          [Report No. 105-384]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

    Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                     Rules, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 5, 1997

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
9873.

#### JOHNSON *v.*THE STATE.

On a trial for burglary, where the fact relied -upon by the State for a conviction is the defendant’s recent possession of articles stolen from -the burglarized premises on the occasion of the burglary, it is error for the court to instruct the jury that the burden is upon the defendant to show that he came by the stolen articles *honestly.*

Decided October 10, 1918.

Indictment for burglary; from Eulton superior court—Judge Hill. May 25, 1918.

*A. M. Brand,*for plaintiff in error.

*John A. Boykin,'solicitor-general, E. A. Stephens,*contra.

Broyles, P. J.

The defendant was on trial for burglary, and the fact,, relied upon by the State for his conviction, was that he was found in recent possession of articles stolen from the burglarized premises at the time of the burglary. In view of this fact, and of the further fact that the evidence did not demand the defendant’s conviction, the majority of this court hold that it was reversible error for the court to instruct the jury, in substance, that th.e accused must satisfy the jury that he came into possession of the stolen articles *honestly. Falvey*v. *State,*85 *Ga.*157 (11 S. E. 607); *Cornwall*v. *State,*91 *Ga.*277 (7), 283 (18 S. E. 154). The Writer, while agreeing that this instruction was inaccurate, .does not think that it requires a new trial when it is considered in the light of the charge as a whole.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur; Broyles, P. J., dissents.*
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JASON M. WEISKOPF

Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County

No. 95-02362 Arthur T. Bennett, Judge

No. W2000-02308-CCA-RM-CD - Filed October 11, 2000

This case is before the court upon remand from the Supreme Court of Tennessee for reconsideration

in light of State v. Nichols, ___ S.W.3d ___ (Tenn. 2000). Previously, this court found the "weigh

and consider" jury instruction to be in violation of due process. Nichols reached a contrary

conclusion; therefore, we now affirm the judgment of the trial court. 

Tenn R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Criminal Court Affirmed

JOE G. RILEY,J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which GARY R. WADE, P.J., and DAVID G.

HAYES, J., joined.

Leslie I. Ballin and Mark A. Mesler, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Jason M. Weiskopf.

Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Elizabeth T. Ryan, Assistant Attorney General;

William L. Gibbons, District Attorney General; and Thomas D. Henderson, Assistant District

Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.

OPINION

Defendant was convicted by a Shelby County jury of premeditated first degree murder and

sentenced to life imprisonment. In the direct appeal, this court found all issues to be without merit

except for the jury instruction relating to parole eligibility. Specifically, this court concluded that

the jury instruction authorizing the jury to "weigh and consider the meaning of a sentence of

imprisonment" was in violation of due process. State v. Jason M. Weiskopf, No. 02C01-9611-CR00381, 1998 WL 40672 (Tenn. Crim. App. filed February 4, 1998, at Jackson). Subsequently, the

Supreme Court of Tennessee remanded to this court for reconsideration in light of State v. King, 973

S.W.2d 586 (Tenn. 1998). State v. Jason M. Weiskopf, No. 02C01-9611-CR-00381, Shelby County

(Tenn. filed November 2, 1998, at Jackson). Upon remand, this court found King to be

distinguishable and again concluded the "weigh and consider" jury instruction was in violation of

due process. State v. Jason M. Weiskopf, No. 02C01-9611-CR-00381, 1998 WL 840000 (Tenn.

Crim. App. filed December 4, 1998, at Jackson). The Supreme Court of Tennessee has now
1

The present statute d isallows an instruc tion on po ssible penaltie s. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-201(b)(Supp.

1999). 

-2-

remanded to this court for reconsideration in light of State v. Nichols, ___ S.W.3d ___ (Tenn. 2000),

which was filed after this court's last opinion. 

The trial judge instructed the jury, pursuant to statute, that the jury could "weigh and consider

the meaning of a sentence of imprisonment." See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-201(b)(2)(A)(i)(Supp.

1994).1

 The Supreme Court of Tennessee has now specifically declared that this instruction is not

in violation of due process. Nichols, ___ S.W.3d at ___. 

Thus, in accordance with the holding of Nichols, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed

in all respects. 

___________________________________ 

JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA 

BY ATTORNEY GENERAL MICHELLE 

HENRY,

Petitioner

v.

VISION PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC, 

VPM HOLDINGS, LLC, ALEX 

SZKARADEK, ANTONI SZKARADEK, ACM 

VISION V, LLC, ACP 1, LLC, ACP 3, LLC, 

ALAN INVESTMENTS III, LLC, ALCA, LLC, 

ARCHWAY COMMUNITY PROPERTIES I, 

LLC, ARCHWAY COMMUNITY 

PROPERTIES, II, LLC, ARCHWAY 

COMMUNITY PROPERTIES, III, LLC, 

ARCHWAY COMMUNITY PROPERTIES, 

IV, LLC, AVALANCHE HOLDINGS 

COMPANY, LLC, AXIS, LLC, BAT 

HOLDINGS EIGHT, LLC, BAT HOLDINGS 

ONE, LLC, BAT HOLDINGS, LLC, BAT 

HOLDINGS TWO, LLC, BAT HOLDINGS 

SIX, LLC, BAT HOLDINGS NINE, LLC, BAT 

HOLDINGS, EIGHT, LLC, BOOM SC, LLC, 

DS NEW, LLC, DSV SPV I, DSV SPV 2, 

DSV SPV3, JOLEK, LLC, KAJA HOLDINGS 

2, LLC, KAJA HOLDINGS, LLC M16S, LP, 

M17S, LP, MON HAVEN 14, LP, 

NATIONAL HOUSING PARTNERS, LLC, 

NEWBRIDGE CAPITAL FUNDING, LLC, 

ONE PINE VIII, LLC, PF I, LLC, PA SEVEN, 

LLC, PANDA, LLC, PANSY, LLC, PENNA, 

LLC, REO, RANCHO, LP, RV HOLDINGS 

SEVEN, LLC, RV HOLDINGS FOUR, LLC, 

RV HOLDINGS, THREE, LLC, RV 

HOLDINGS ELEVEN LLC, RVFM I, LLC, 

RVFM II SERIES, LLC, RVFM 12, LLC, 

RVFM 13 SERIES, LLC, RVFM 2, LLC, 

RVFM 3, LLC, RVFM 4 SERIES, LLC, 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 171 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court
[171 WAL 2023] - 2

RVFM 5, LLC, RVFM 6, LLC, RVFM 8, LLC, 

SP 1, LLC, VPM REALTY, LLC,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of December, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all 

remaining issues. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(1) When entering default judgment under Pa.R.Civ.P. 4019, what are the limits 

on the relief a trial court can award in an equity action in which the plaintiff 

included a general prayer for relief in the complaint?

(2) Does an appellant’s generic opposition to a dispositive motion allow it to 

raise any issue on appeal even though it articulated no specific legal 

objections in the trial court?
#### John H. Stewart, etc., *v.*J. H. Norton.

Pleadings — Set-Off—Failure to Deny.

There being no denial upon the part of appellants that the set-offs were true they must be taken for confessed.

APPEAL PROM ESTILL CIRCUIT COURT.

April 11, 1871.

*Riddle, for appellants.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

There being no denial upon the part of appellants that the set-offs relied upon by Norton, etc., were true, nor of the execution of the memorandum of settlement by the appellants which the Nortons filed with their answer in support of the same, said set-offs must be taken as confessed. The balance alleged to be due on the notes executed to Temperance and Stewart is admitted to be correct. With these admissions the court could not have rendered a judgment more favorable to appellants than that from which they appeal. The same must therefore be affirmed.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

INVENTUS POWER, INC., and 

ICC ELECTRONICS (DONGGUAN) LTD., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

SHENZHEN ACE BATTERY CO., LTD., 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: 1:20-cv-03375 

 

Judge: Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. 

Magistrate Judge: Honorable Jeffrey Cummings 

ACE’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL 

Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, Defendant Shenzhen Ace Battery Co., Ltd. respectfully moves 

this Court for leave to file under seal documents ACE’s Response to Plaintiffs’ Request for Sanction 

[Dkt, 231] and Exhibits under seal. 

ACE believes that the documents contain highly confidential information that is relevant to 

ACE’s documents production and individual’s identities. 

Therefore, ACE requests the Court grant its leave to file the Exhibits under seal. 

Date: 05/14/2022 

Respectfully Submitted: 

/s/ He Cheng 

He Cheng 

Glacier Law LLP 

200 Park Avenue, Suite 1703 

New York, NY 10166 

(332) 208-8882 

Attorney for Defendant

Case: 1:20-cv-03375 Document #: 235 Filed: 05/14/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:6024
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this May 14, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, along with the attached Exhibits, and service was 

perfected on all counsel of record and interested parties through this system, which will deliver a true 

and correct copy of the foregoing documents via CM/ECF. 

Date: 05/14/2022 /s/ He Cheng 

He Cheng 

Case: 1:20-cv-03375 Document #: 235 Filed: 05/14/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:6025
#### IN RE SPRINGMOOR, INC.

No. 79PA97

Case below: 125 N.C.App. 184

Petition by appellant for writ of supersedeas allowed 5 June 1997. Petition by appellant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 5 June 1997.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>      1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                 0            
<SECURITIES>                                           0            
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0            
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0            
<INVENTORY>                                            0            
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       0<F1>       
<PP&E>                                              1736            
<DEPRECIATION>                                       384            
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      1461            
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  0<F1>        
<BONDS>                                                0                      
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0            
<PREFERRED>                                         7100            
<COMMON>                                               0            
<OTHER-SE>                                         (6591)           
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        1461            
<SALES>                                                0            
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    3032            
<CGS>                                                  0            
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       4872            
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0            
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0            
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   112            
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (1952)           
<INCOME-TAX>                                         (51)           
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (1901)           
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0            
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0            
<CHANGES>                                              0            
<NET-INCOME>                                       (1901)           
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0            
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0            
<FN>
<F1> * Unclassified Balance Sheet
</FN>
                                                          

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                        0
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                           661,831
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                             101,803
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        763,634
<PP&E>                                  229,672
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        1,200,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 2,029,954
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  2,361
<OTHER-SE>                           (1,169,051)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          1,200,058
<SALES>                               1,541,072
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      1,541,072
<CGS>                                   632,191
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           632,191
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        834,874
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     (254,682)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (180,675)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                           (180,675)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.07)


</TABLE>