alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 301

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to repeal the exception

to the requirement that public committee proceedings be open to all media.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 4, 1997

Mr. SOLOMON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to

repeal the exception to the requirement that public committee proceedings be open to all media.

1 Resolved, That (a) clause 3(f) of rule XI of the Rules

2 of the House of Representatives is amended by repealing

3 subdivision (2) and by redesignating subdivisions (3)

4 through (13) as subdivisions (2) through (12), respec5 tively.

6 (b) Clause 2(g)(1) of rule XI of the Rules of the

7 House of Representatives is amended by striking ‘‘, except

8 as provided by clause 3(f)(2)’’.
2

•HRES 301 IH

1 (c) The first sentence of clause 3(e) of rule XI of

2 the Rules of the House of Representatives is amended by

3 striking ‘‘, except as provided in paragraph (f)(2)’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Stereotaxis, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael P. Kaminski, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                     |  |  |  |                                                                          
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: April 27, 2012 |  |  |  | /s/    MICHAEL P.
KAMINSKI                                               
|                     |  |  |  | Michael P. Kaminski President & Chief Executive Officer Stereotaxis,
Inc.
#### Brown *v.*White, in Error.

*BASIL BROWN*and *George W. L. White*were partners in a certain business, and dissolved their partnership in *February,*1833. By the article of agreement dissolving the partnership, *Brozan,*in consideration of *White's*relinquishment.of his interest in the partnership property, agreed to pay *White*600 dollars, one half in the month of *June*following, and the other half within twelve months, and to discharge the debts of the firm and indemnify *White*from the payment of the same: “For the performance of which,” as the agreement stated; *“Brozan*was to give to the said *White*security.”

In an action of covenant by *White*against *Brozan*on this agreement, in which the plaintiff averred performance of his part and recovered, the following points were decided:—

1. The security contemplated by the agreement to be given by *Brozan,*was for his payment of the .600 dollars, as well as for his performance of the other covenants.

*4322. For a breach of any of *Brown’s*covenants in the agreement, a suit might be sustained against him *by White,*without an averment in the declaration that a performance had been previously requested.

■ 3. Promissory notes executed by *Brown*alone, were not the security for the payment of the 600 dollars, which wás required by the agreement,

*J. Morrison,*for the plaintiff.

C. *Fletcher*and *W. Quarles,*for the defendant.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350**








In
      connection with the annual report on Form 10K-SB of Rotoblock Corporation
      (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the Report), I, Matthias Heinze, Principal Executive Officer, hereby
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





(1)
      the
      annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Registrant.










Date:
      July 27, 2006      ROTOBLOCK
      CORPORATION,  Registrant





/s/ 
      Matthias Heinze


By:
      Matthias Heinze, President and


Principal Executive Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Your Flight Log","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"e7qH4UQTti\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/your-flight-log\/\">Your Flight Log<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/your-flight-log\/embed\/#?secret=e7qH4UQTti\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Your Flight Log” — NASA\" data-secret=\"e7qH4UQTti\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/pilot-logbook-cover.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":777}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001<F1>
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             521
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   521
<PP&E>                                           71164
<DEPRECIATION>                                   41510
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   30175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           573191
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         55767
<OTHER-SE>                                    (598783)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     30175
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     8460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8460)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8460)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8460)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.005)
<FN>
<F1>
</FN>


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 253 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 30, 1997.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the 
resolution (H. Res. 244) demanding that the Office of the United States Attorney 
for the Central District of California file criminal charges against Hermandad 
Mexicana Nacional for failure to comply with a valid subpoena under the Federal 
Contested Elections Act. The resolution shall be considered as read for 
amendment. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
resolution and the preamble to final adoption without intervening motion except: 
(1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on House Oversight; and (2) one motion 
to recommit which may not contain instructions and on which the previous 
question shall be considered as ordered.
    Sec. 2. Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution, the 
amendment specified in section 3 of this resolution shall be considered as 
adopted.
    Sec. 3. The amendment described in section 2 of this resolution is as 
follows: On page 3, line 4, after ``filing'' insert the following: ``, pursuant 
to its determination that it is appropriate according to the law and the 
facts,''.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Richard L. Browdy, President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of and for the period covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                                         
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 15, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Richard L. Browdy                                   
|                     |  |  |  | Richard L. Browdy, President and Chief Financial Officer
|                     |  |  |  | (Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

OUYEINC LTD.,

Plaintiff,

v.

Alucy and et al., 

Defendants.

Case No. 20 cv 3490

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT 

AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS IDENTIFIED IN THE ATTACHED SCHEDULE A, 

WITH THE EXCEPTION OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS

NOW COMES Plaintiff Ouyeinc Ltd. (“Plaintiff”), by its counsels, Barney & Karamanis, 

LLP, and hereby moves this Honorable Court to enter Default and Default Judgment against the 

defendants identified in the attached Schedule A. In support of this Motion, Plaintiff submits the 

accompanying Memorandum.

DATED October 1, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ James A. Karamanis

James A. Karamanis

Barney & Karamanis, LLP

Two Prudential Plaza

180 N. Stetson, Ste 3050

Chicago, IL 60601

Tel.: 312/553-5300

Attorney No. 6203479

James@bkchicagolaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF Ouyeinc Ltd.

Case: 1:20-cv-03490 Document #: 66 Filed: 10/01/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:362
9665.

#### Popwell Brothers *et al. v.*Lott-Lewis Co.

Wade, C. J.

Where in an action on an alleged account stated, which was apparently barred by the statute of limitations, the plaintiff, in an effort to avoid the bar, averred that the original liability was revived by a. new promise to pay (Civil Code of 1910, § 4386), and all the testimony introduced showed conclusively that the “new promise” was not in writing, as is required by the mandatory provisions of the Civil Code, § 4383, a verdict in favor of the defendant’s plea that the account was *696barred was demanded; and the finding of the jury in favor of the plaintiff should have been set aside, on the motion for a new trial.

Decided October 16, 1918.

Coniplaint; from city court of Brunswick—Judge Krauss. March 9, 1918.

*Oscar Nail, O. B. Conyers,*for plaintiffs in error.

*F. M. Scarlett Jr.,*contra.

Judgment. *reversed.*

*Jenkins and Luhe, JJ., concur.*
GROUP EXHIBIT 1

EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT B





EXHIBIT C






EXHIBIT D
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 25 Agreed to House (ATH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 25

  Designating membership on certain standing committees of the House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 1997

Mr. Armey submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating membership on certain standing committees of the House.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and they are hereby, 
elected to the following standing committees:
    Committee on Science: Mr. Sensenbrenner, Chairman.
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. Talent, Chairman.
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Stump, Chairman.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cr−00231

Honorable Susan E. Cox

Yen Cham Yung

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, June 26, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Susan E. Cox as to Yen Cham Yung: Initial

Appearance set for 6/30/2020 at 02:00 PM. before the Duty Judge in Courtroom 1743.

Mailed notice (np, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-40129

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MICHAEL SHELLEY,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:18-CR-92-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, HO, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Michael Shelley appeals the procedural and substantive reasonableness 

of his 10-year sentence for bank fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1344, an offense that 

is punishable by up to 30 years in prison. The Government has filed a motion 

to dismiss the appeal based on his appeal waiver in the plea agreement.

Notwithstanding Shelley’s creative argument to the contrary, the record 

reflects that he understood that he was waiving the right to appeal his sentence

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 9, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-40129 Document: 00515265796 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/09/2020
No. 19-40129

2

in the plea agreement unless the sentence exceeded the 30-year statutory 

maximum or resulted from ineffective assistance of counsel. The meaning of 

the waiver was clearly conveyed by the straightforward plea agreement, which 

Shelley read and signed after careful review with his attorney, and by the 

magistrate judge at the plea hearing. Accordingly, the waiver was knowing 

and voluntary. See United States v. Portillo, 18 F.3d 290, 292 (5th Cir. 1994).

We reject Shelley’s assertion that the Government should be required to 

waive its contractual right to enforce the appeal waiver, having satisfied its 

own obligation to recommend a sentence at the low end of the guidelines range. 

To the extent Shelley contends that we should not enforce the appeal waiver 

because it unfairly prevents him from raising meritorious claims, we have

never recognized such an exception to a valid appeal waiver.

Because the waiver was informed and voluntary, Shelley “will be held to 

the bargain to which he agreed.” Id. at 293. The plain language of the waiver 

applies to bar his appeal. See United States v. Bond, 414 F.3d 542, 544 (5th 

Cir. 2005). The Government’s motion is GRANTED, and the case is 

DISMISSED. Shelley’s request that we take judicial notice of a grant of 

certiorari in a case relevant to the merits of his appeal is DENIED as moot.

 Case: 19-40129 Document: 00515265796 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/09/2020
H. Res. 238

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 24, 1997.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 2209) making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1998,

and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Otelco Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael D. Weaver, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




1.         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Michael D. WeaverMichael D. Weaver

President & Chief Executive Officer

March 4, 2011




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 12
  PEOPLESUPPORT,
    INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
  COMPUTATION
    OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 (In
    thousands)
  Earnings per 503(d)(1)(C)

2006


2005


2004


2003


2002


2001Pre-tax income

$
14,508


$
10,764


$
1,461


$
8,217


$
(2,879
)

$
(11,657
)Interest expense


8



0



0



3



506



790Estimated interest in rent expense


1,156



889



648



720



872



988Interest capitalized


0



0



0



0



(15
)


(41
)Earnings per 503(d)(1)(C)

$
15,672


$
11,653


$
2,109


$
8,940


$
(1,516
)

$
(9,920
)   Fixed Charges 503(d)(1)(B)

2006


2005


2004


2003


2002


2001Interest expense and capitalized

$
8


$
0


$
0


$
3


$
506


$
790Estimated interest in rent expense


1,156



889



648



720



872



988Fixed charges per 503(d)(1)(B)

$
1,164


$
889


$
648


$
723


$
1,378


$
1,778Ratio of earnings to fixed charges


13



13



3



12



n/a



n/a
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2176

THE ESTATE OF KENNETH B. FENNELL, by and

through Norwood F. Fennell and Annie B. Fennell, Co-administrators; NORWOOD F. FENNELL,

ANNIE B. FENNELL,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

R. L. STEPHENSON, in his personal capacity,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

GORDON B. ARNOLD, in his personal capacity;

JOHN DOES, State Officials, in their personal

capacities,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr.,

District Judge. (CA-95-795-2)

Submitted: May 29, 1998 Decided: July 21, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alan McSurely, MCSURELY, DOROSIN & OSMENT, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Earl Whitted, Jr., Goldsboro, North Carolina, for Appellants.

Isaac T. Avery, III, Special Deputy Attorney General, Reuben F.

Young, Assistant Attorney General, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

The parents of Kenneth Fennell, individually and as coadministrators of his estate, appeal from the district court’s

order denying relief on their claim of violations of Fennell’s

Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985

(1994), and violations of North Carolina common law, including

wrongful death and conspiracy. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Estate of Fennell

v. Stephenson, No. CA-95-795-2 (M.D.N.C. July 29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED