alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as principal executive officer of Xerium Technologies, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that, to his knowledge:

1) the Companys Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Companys Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2006, fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Thomas GutierrezThomas GutierrezPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


Dated: August 23, 2007
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 186

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to allow proxy voting

in committees when a Member is engaged in official business in the

District of Columbia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 15, 1997

Mr. FATTAH (for himself, Mr. FRANK of Massachusettts, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr.

TIERNEY, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Ms. CHRISTIAN-GREEN, and Mr. RANGEL) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to

allow proxy voting in committees when a Member is

engaged in official business in the District of Columbia.

1 Resolved, That clause 2(f) of rule XI of the Rules of

2 the House of Representatives is amended to read as fol3 lows:

4 ‘‘Proxy voting

5 ‘‘(f) No vote by any member of any committee or sub6 committee with respect to any measure or matter may be

7 cast by proxy, unless such committee, by written rule

8 adopted by the committee, permits voting by proxy and
2

•HRES 186 IH

1 requires that the proxy authorization shall be in writing,

2 shall assert that the Member is absent on official business

3 in the District of Columbia, shall designate the individual

4 who is to execute the proxy authorization, and shall be

5 limited to a specific measure or matter and any amend6 ments or motions pertaining thereto for one day; except

7 that a Member may authorize a general proxy only for

8 motions to recess or adjourn. Each proxy to be effective

9 shall be signed by the Member assigning his or her vote

10 and shall contain the date and time of day the proxy is

11 signed and shall be accompanied by a written statement

12 as to the specific official duties the Member will be en13 gaged in that preclude being present to vote. Proxies may

14 not be counted for a quorum.’’.

Æ
#### D. M. Flournoy v. Fields Morris, etc.

Judgment — Court has no Power to Set Aside at Subsequent Term.

No appeal was prosecuted from the judgment, and it was not within the power of Circuit Court, at a subsequent term, to set it aside, nor to refuse to permit it to be enforced according to its spirit.

Judicial Sale — Proceeds Cannot be Diverted.

The proceeds of a judicial sale cannot be diverted from its adjudged destination.

Same — Failure of Purchaser to Give Bond.

The creditor and not the debtor is the party to except to report of sale on account of the failure of the purchaser to execute a sale bond.

APPEAL FROM McCRACKEN COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.

Opinion of ti-ie Court by-

Judge Lindsay :

Mrs. Carrie Flournoy was before the court by service of process and had filed her answer asserting claim to the house and lot conveyed to her by her father, prior to the rendition of the judgment of May 6, 1868.

*48
      *J. Cmnpbell, for appellant.*

*Bigger*& *Moss, J. W. Hopkins, for appellees.*

By that judgment it was determined that her right to the property in question was subordinate to that of her husband’s creditors. The house and lot were decreed to be sold, and the proceeds of the sale, or so much thereof as might be necessary, applied to the payment of the debts due and owing from her husband to these appellees.

It is not necessary for us to determine whether or not the court erred in failing to set apart*' to her one thousand dollars, the value of the homestead the husband might have retained as against those appellees, in case he had not conveyed the property to his wife’s father. No appeal was prosecuted from such judgment, and it was not within the power of the circuit court, at a subsequent term, to set it aside, nor to refuse to permit it to be enforced according to its spirit.

Appellants, therefore, were not prejudiced by the refusal of the circuit court to permit their supplemental petitions to be filed. Under the judgment of May 6, 1868, appellees were entitled to have their debts paid out of the proceeds of the sale of the house and lot, and as that judgment could not be vacated except for some one of the reasons or causes enumerated in section 579 of the Civil Code, neither could the proceeds arising from such sale, or any part thereof, be diverted from their adjudged destination, and applied to the use of one or both of these appellants.

There is no exception made to the commissioner’s report because of the fact that the sale was made on a credit of six months instead of six and twelve months as directed by the judgment. This informality must therefore be regarded as having been waived.

The exception based upon the fact that the purchasers had not given bond was properly overruled. It was the appellees and not the appellants who were interested in this matter.

Judgment *affirmed.*
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of River Rock Entertainment Authority (the “Authority”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph R. Callahan,Chief Financial Officer and Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Authority,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Authority.

 
| By:                                                          | /s/ Joseph R. Callahan |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|--------|
| Joseph R. Callahan                                           |                   |
| Acting Chief Executive  Officer and

Chief Financial Officer |                   |
| March 31, 2010                                          |                   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the RiverRock Entertainment Authority and will be retained by the River RockEntertainment Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

NIKE, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

AWEFAM, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 20-cv-03733 

Judge Thomas M. Durkin 

Magistrate Judge Gabriel A. Fuentes

SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT 

WHEREAS, a judgment was entered in the above action on September 11, 2020 [51], in 

favor of Plaintiff Nike, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Nike”) and against the Defendants Identified in 

Schedule A in the amount of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) per Defaulting Defendant 

for willful use of counterfeit Nike Trademarks in connection with the offer for sale and/or sale of 

products through at least the Defendant Internet Stores, and Nike acknowledges payment of an 

agreed upon damages amount, costs, and interest and desires to release this judgment and hereby 

fully and completely satisfy the same as to the following Defendant: 

Defendant Name Line No. 

luohan1003 185 

THEREFORE, full and complete satisfaction of said judgment as to the above-referenced 

Defendant is hereby acknowledged, and the Clerk of the Court is hereby authorized and directed 

to make an entry of the full and complete satisfaction on the docket of said judgment. 

Case: 1:20-cv-03733 Document #: 58 Filed: 12/18/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:3563
2 

Dated this 18th day of December 2020. Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ RiKaleigh C. Johnson 

Amy C. Ziegler 

Justin R. Gaudio 

 RiKaleigh C. Johnson 

 Jake M. Christensen 

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. 

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

312.360.0080 / 312.360.9315 (facsimile) 

aziegler@gbc.law 

jgaudio@gbc.law 

 rjohnson@gbc.law 

 jchristensen@gbc.law 

 Counsel for Plaintiff Nike, Inc. 

Case: 1:20-cv-03733 Document #: 58 Filed: 12/18/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:3564
Case: 1:20-cv-02664 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/01/20 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1
Case: 1:20-cv-02664 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/01/20 Page 2 of 9 PageID #:2
Case: 1:20-cv-02664 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/01/20 Page 3 of 9 PageID #:3
Case: 1:20-cv-02664 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/01/20 Page 4 of 9 PageID #:4
Case: 1:20-cv-02664 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/01/20 Page 5 of 9 PageID #:5
Case: 1:20-cv-02664 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/01/20 Page 6 of 9 PageID #:6
Case: 1:20-cv-02664 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/01/20 Page 7 of 9 PageID #:7
Case: 1:20-cv-02664 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/01/20 Page 8 of 9 PageID #:8
Case: 1:20-cv-02664 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/01/20 Page 9 of 9 PageID #:9
No. 87-573.

#### United States *v.*Taylor.

C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 484 U. S. 1025.] Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that Ian G. Loveseth, Esq., of San Francisco, Cal., be appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case.
H. Res. 452

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 22, 1998.

Whereas the United States Postal Service has realized a cumulative net income of approximately $5,800,000,000

during the past three and one-half fiscal years;

Whereas the national rate of inflation has declined substantially during that time;

Whereas the postal customers and taxpayers of the United

States deserve to share in the recent financial gains of

the Postal Service;

Whereas any increase in postage rates affects every citizen,

resident, and business in the United States, and is especially harmful to individuals living on low or fixed incomes;

Whereas the Postal Rate Commission issued a recommended

decision on May 11, 1998, that proposes, among other

things, increases in certain postage rates;

Whereas it has been estimated that the proposed rate increase for first-class mail would increase the annual revenue of the Postal Service by approximately

$1,000,000,000; and

Whereas the Board of Governors of the Postal Service is expected to meet in June 1998 to act upon the recommended decision: Now, therefore, be it
2

•HRES 452 EH

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that the Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service should reject the recommended decision issued by

the Postal Rate Commission on May 11, 1998, to the extent

that it provides for any increase in postage rates.

Attest:

Clerk.
# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ January 20 , 201 6

ERRATA

______________________

Appeal No. 2015

- 1047

REDLINE DETECTION, L LC, Appellant

v.

STAR ENVIROTECH, INC ., Appellee

Decided: December 31, 2015 Precedential Opinion

______________________ Please make the following changes:

On page twenty

- four, line s 1

– 9, replace the sentence

When asserting that a claimed invention would have been obvious, that party “must demo nstrate by clear and convincing evidence that a skilled artisan would have had reason to co mbine the teaching of the prior art references to achieve the claimed invention, and that the skilled artisan would have had a reasona ble e xpectation of success from doing so.” PAR Pharm., Inc. v. TWI Pharm., Inc. , 773 F.3dREDLINE DETECTION
, LLC v. STAR ENVIROTECH
, INC

. 2

1186, 1193 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).

with the following sentence:

When asserting that a claimed invention would have been obvious, that party “must demo nstrate

. . . that a skilled artisan would have had reason to combine the teaching of the prior art references to achieve the claimed invention, and that the skilled arti san would have had a re asonable expectation of success from doing so.” PAR Pharm., Inc. v. TWI Pharm., Inc ., 773 F.3d 1186, 1193 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see Ariosa Diagnostics v. Verinata Health, Inc. , 805 F.3d 1 359, 1364

– 65 (Fed. Cir. 2015); see also 35 U.S.C. § 316(e) (“In an inter partes review instituted under this chapter, the petitioner shall have the burden of proving a proposition of unpatentabi lity by a preponderance of the evidence.”).
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of CHINA CGAME, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/  Zhixin (Steven) XingZhixin (Steven) XingChief Executive OfficerApril 15, 2011/s/   Qin (Andy) LuQin (Andy) LuActing Chief Financial Officer and Corporate SecretaryApril 15, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CHINA CGAME, INC. and will be retained by CHINA CGAME, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Stereotaxis, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel J. Johnston, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                             
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 11, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    DANIEL J.
JOHNSTON                                   
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Daniel J. Johnston Chief Financial Officer Stereotaxis,
Inc.
November 15 , 2011



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DAVID LORENZA JOYNCER , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00 808

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

____________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED . The Court orders the appeal
DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion, that the appellant pay all costs expended in this app eal, and that this decision be certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT 15.26

 

 

Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. 

5330 East 31st Street

Tulsa, Oklahoma

We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financial information of Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. and subsidiaries for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005,  and have issued our report dated November 8, 2006 (February 26, 2007, as to the effects of the restatement discussed in Note 17). As indicated in such report, because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is        included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-79603, No. 333-89189, No. 333-33144, No. 333-33146, No. 333-50800, No. 333-128714 and No. 333-136611 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Tulsa, Oklahoma

February 26, 2007
DRAFT for comment January 26, 2023 

Crosswalk 

AI RMF (1.0) and ISO/IEC FDIS 23894 Information technology - Artificial intelligence 

Guidance on risk management 

*Note ISO/IEC FDIS 23894 is a final draft international standard and expected to be published 

in 2023. 

AI RMF 1.0 Function 

GOVERN: Culture 

of risk management 

is cultivated and 

present. 

MAP: Context is 

recognized and risks 

related to context 

are identified. 

MEASURE: 

Identified risks are 

assessed, analyzed, 

or tracked. 

ISO/IEC FDIS 23894 

5.2 Leadership and commitment 

5.3 Integration (references ISO 31000:2018) 

5.4 Design 

5.4.1 Understanding the organization and its context 

5.4.2 Articulating risk management commitment (references 

ISO 31000:2018) 

5.4.3 Assigning organizational roles, authorities, responsibilities, and accountabilities (references ISO 31000:2018) 

5.4.4 Allocating resources (ref. ISO 31000:2018) 

5.4.5 Establishing communication and consultation (references ISO 31000:2018) 

5.4.1 Understanding the organization and its context 

6.3.2 Defining the scope 

6.3.3 External and internal context 

6.3.4 Defining risk criteria 

6.4.2 Risk identification 

6.4.2.3 Identification of risk sources 

6.4.2.4 Identification of potential events and outcomes 

6.4.2.6 Identification of consequences 

6.4.3 Risk Analysis 

6.7 Recording and reporting 

5.7 Improvement (references ISO 31000:2018) 

6.3.4 Defining risk criteria 

6.4.2.5 Identification of controls 

6.4.3 Risk Analysis 

6.4.3.2 Assessment of consequences 

6.4.3.3 Assessment of likelihood 

6.6 Monitoring and review (references ISO 31000:2018) 

Continued on next page 

1 

1 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AI RMF 1.0 Function ISO/IEC FDIS 23894 

6.7 Recording and reporting 

MANAGE: Risks are 5.5 Implementation (references ISO 31000:2018) 

prioritized and acted 

upon based on 

projected impact. 

5.7 Improvement (references ISO 31000:2018) 

6.5 Risk Treatment 

6.5.2 Selection of risk treatment options 

6.5.3 Preparing and implementing risk treatment plans 

6.6 Monitoring and review (references ISO 31000:2018) 

6.7 Recording and reporting 

2
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)





I,
Randall J. Frapart, of US Dataworks, Inc. certify pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(i) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the
“Report”), which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(ii)
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of US Dataworks, Inc. as of
the dates and for the periods expressed in the report.





Dated:
November 16, 2009





/s/ Randall J. FrapartRandall
      J. FrapartChief
      Financial Officer
NUMBER 13-14-00519-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

ELSA HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellant,

v.

ROSA SAENZ, Appellee. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Elsa Housing Aurhority, filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the 

County Court at Law No. 5 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number CL-12-0253-E. 

Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to withdraw the appeal on grounds the parties 

have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences. Appellant 

requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.
2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed 

motion to withdraw the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to withdraw is granted, and the appeal is 

hereby DISMISSED. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed 

against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the 

parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at 

appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will 

issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

5th day of February, 2015.