alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001048407
<NAME>                        ENERGY VENTURES INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                         35,240
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  32,740
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               399,557
<PP&E>                                         738,791
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,138,348
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,354,871
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,363
<OTHER-SE>                                     (350,750)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,138,348
<SALES>                                        25,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               25,000
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,143,579
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (1,118,579)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             32,066
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,118,579)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,118,579)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.08)



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 21.1**

**Subsidiaries      of the Registrant**

|                                                   |   |                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
| **Subsidiary**                                         |   | **Jurisdiction                of Organization** |
|                                                   |   |
| 1.                Index Oil & Gas, Ltd.            |   | United                Kingdom                   |
|                                                   |   |                                            |
| 2.                Index Investments North America Inc. |   | Delaware                                        |
|                                                   |   |                                            |
| 3.                Index Oil & Gas (USA), LLC       |   | Delaware                                        |
|                                                   |   |                                            |
| 4.                Index Offshore LLC                   |   | Delaware                                        |
UNITED STATES NTSTMCT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

[?/FILED

JUN t a 2020

- TLTOMAS G. BHUTON

ctERK u.s. Dtsrntcf c6unr

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JOSEPH HAMMOND

No. 20 CR 263 JUDGE SHATI

Violation: Title 18, United States

Code, Section 922(g) (L)

MAGISTRAIE JUDGE FUENTES

The SPECIAL JANUARY 20Lg GRA.ND JURY charges:

On or about June 3, 2020, at Chicago, in the Northern District of Illinois,

Eastern Division, and elsewhere,

JOSEPH HAMMOND,

defendant herein, knowing that he had previously been convicted of a crime

punishable by a term of imprisonment exceeding one year, did knowingly possess, in

and afflecting interstate and. foreign commerce, a firearm, namely, a loaded Glock,

Mode1 20, 10mm semi-automatic pistol, bearing serial number BDMW734, which

firearm had traveled in interstate and foreign commerce prior to defendant's

possession of the firearm;

In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 922(d$).

Case: 1:20-cr-00263 Document #: 12 Filed: 06/10/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:37
FORFEITURE ALLEGATION

The SPECIAL JANUARY 2AI9 GRA.ND JURY further alleges:

1. Upon conviction of an offense in violation of Title 18, United States Code,

Section 922(g)(l),as set forth in this Indictment, defendant shall forfeit to the United

States of America any firearm and ammunition involved in and used in the offense,

as provided in Title 18, United States Code, Section g24(d)(L), and Title 28, United,

States Code, Section 2461(c).

2. The property to be forfeited includes, but is not limited to, a Glock, Model

20, 10mm semi-automatic pistol, bearing serial number BDMW73 4, and. associated

ammunition.

A TRUE BILL:

FOREPERSON

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

Case: 1:20-cr-00263 Document #: 12 Filed: 06/10/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:38
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

OUYEINC LTD.,

Plaintiff,

v.

Alucy and et al., 

Defendants.

Case No. 20 cv 3490

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL UNDER RULE 41(a)(1)

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Ouyeinc Ltd.

(“Ouyeinc” or “Plaintiff”) hereby dismisses this action with prejudice pursuant to settlement as 

to the following Defendants:

Defendant Name Line No.

2015kids 89

nubeestore 387

you-shop-1 532

BEST CUSTOMER SERVICE 11

G-Mat 35

Outdoor	Sports	007 54

DATED August 4, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ James A. Karamanis

Case: 1:20-cv-03490 Document #: 43 Filed: 08/04/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:226
James A. Karamanis

Barney & Karamanis, LLP

Two Prudential Plaza

180 N. Stetson, Ste 3050

Chicago, IL 60601

Tel.: 312/553-5300

Attorney No. 6203479

James@bkchicagolaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF Ouyeinc Ltd.

Case: 1:20-cv-03490 Document #: 43 Filed: 08/04/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:227
EXHIBIT 4

Case: 1:20-cv-02402 Document #: 50-4 Filed: 11/01/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:481
Linnea Pedelty <linnea@nickwooten.com>

Maxwell vs . Wells Fargo - Request for Confirmation

Parker, Chris <CParker@winston.com> Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 5:31 PM

To: Nick Wooten <nick@nickwooten.com>, "Smedley, Angela A." <ASmedley@winston.com>, "Obi, Shawn" <SObi@winston.com>,

"Glauberman, Scott" <SGlauber@winston.com>, Rusty Payton <info@payton.legal>, "Salvador J. Lopez" <lopez@robsonlopez.com>,

Sandy Flores <sflores@robsonlopez.com>, Linnea Pedelty <linnea@nickwooten.com>

Nick,

At this time, Wells Fargo intends to produce, on a rolling basis, documents in support of its defenses (responsive to RFP Nos. 61, 62,

73, 78, 79, 82-97). However, Wells Fargo’s production is complete as to the rest of Plaintiff’s RFPs. Wells Fargo does not anticipate

further supplementation of its discovery responses.

Best,

Chris

Christopher M. Parker

Associate Attorney

Winston & Strawn LLP

35 W. Wacker Drive

Chicago, IL 60601-9703

D: +1 312-558-8085

M: +1 516-983-9948

F: +1 312-558-5700

VCard | Email | winston.com

From: Nick Wooten <nick@nickwooten.com>

Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 8:58 AM

To: Smedley, Angela A. <ASmedley@winston.com>; Obi, Shawn <SObi@winston.com>; Parker, Chris <CParker@winston.com>;

Glauberman, Scott <SGlauber@winston.com>; Rusty Payton <info@payton.legal>; Salvador J. Lopez <lopez@robsonlopez.com>;

Sandy Flores <sflores@robsonlopez.com>; Linnea Pedelty <linnea@nickwooten.com>

Subject: Maxwell vs . Wells Fargo - Request for Confirmation

Angela, Shawn, and Chris,

I am writing to determine if Wells Fargo has any further supplementation to any of its discovery responses or any further document

production prior to the filing of our motion to compel.

Can you please confirm that Wells Fargo's responses are complete in the absence of an order compelling further responses by the

Court?

Case: 1:20-cv-02402 Document #: 50-4 Filed: 11/01/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:482
Thanks,

Nick

Nick Wooten, LLM, CAM, MFP, CWM, AFA, CPM

Nick Wooten, LLC

5125 Burnt Pine Drive

Conway, Ar. 72034

833-937-6389

nick@nickwooten.com

Honorary Global Advisor USA

American Academy of Financial Management

The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. If this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of

this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author. Any tax advice

contained in this email was not intended to be used, and cannot be used, by you (or any other taxpayer) to avoid penalties under applicable tax laws and

regulations.

Case: 1:20-cv-02402 Document #: 50-4 Filed: 11/01/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:483
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, Saed Mohseni,Chief Executive Officer, in connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof McCormick & Schmick’s Seafood Restaurants, Inc. for the annualperiod ended December 25, 2004 (the “Report”), hereby certify inaccordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of McCormick & Schmick’s Seafood Restaurants, Inc.
| /s/ SAED  MOHSENI                |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|
| Saed Mohseni                     |
| *Chief Executive Officer*        |
| Dated:  April 8,  2005 |

 

----
AO 440 (Rev. 05/00) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL CASE

V.

CASE NUMBER: 1:20-cv-03187

ASSIGNED JUDGE: Honorable Mary M. Rowland

DESIGNATED MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Honorable Sheila 

M. Finnegan

TO: (Name and address of Defendant)

YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to serve upon PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEY (name and address)

an answer to the complaint which is herewith served upon you, days after service of this

summons upon you, exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for

the relief demanded in the complaint. You must also file your answer with the Clerk of this Court within a reasonable

period of time after service.

THOMAS G. BRUTON, CLERK

(By) DEPUTY CLERK

June 1, 2020

DATE

Case: 1:20-cv-03187 Document #: 13 Filed: 06/09/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:41
AO LI.LI.O (Rev 0,/00) <.:nmmnm: in a Civil A"tinn 

RETURN OF SERVICE 

DATE 

Service of the Summons and complaint was made by me(ll 6/4/2020

NAME OF SERVER (PRINT) TITLE 

Maria Reyes Paralegal 

Check one box below to indicate appropriate method of service 

D Served personally upon the defendant. Place where served: 

D Left copies thereof at the defendant's dwelling house or usual place of abode with a person of suitable age and 

discretion then residing therein. 

Name of person with whom the summons and complaint were left: 

D Returned unexecuted: 

rn Other (specify): Corporate Service on Registered Agent, CT Corporation System, at 208 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 814, Chicago, IL 60604; 

I Maria Reyes, by instruction of Reg. Agent, created a job for service at https://intake.ctcorporation.com (Job #7234). After approval from 

intake admin., I left an enclosed packet in the mail bin located outside of CT Corp. System's office suite which included copies of: 

Summons, Complaint, Ex. 1 to Complaint, 4th Amended General Order 20-0012, and Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Documents, on June 4, 2020. 

STATEMENT OF SERVICE FEES 

TRAVEL '

SERVICES I

TOTAL 

DECLARATION OF SERVER 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing information 

contained in the Return of Service and Statement of Service Fees is true and correct. 

Executed on 6/9/2020

Date Signature 

rrn.{LQj� 

of Server �ft

77 W. Washington Street, Suite 1402, Chicago, IL 60604 

Address of Server 

(1) As to who may serve a summons see Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Confirmed receipt via e-mail, by intake Specialist Martello Gillespie, on 6/8/2020

Case: 1:20-cv-03187 Document #: 13 Filed: 06/09/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:42
Exhibit 10 (b)

LETTER OF INTENT

October 22, 2003

The parties, listed below, hereby execute this Letter of Intent:

The Kart Store Inc.                   and            Bowman Leisure Karts Ltd.
2251 N. Rampart Blvd., Ste. 323                      Laburnham Farm,
Las Vegas, NV                                        Chiltern Green Road,
                                                     Peters Green
                                                     Bedfordshire LU2 9PW UK

The parties have agreed to pursue an arrangement whereby The Kart Store Inc.
("KS") will acquire the exclusive marketing, sales, assembly and manufacturing
rights to Bowman Leisure Karts Ltd. ("BK") products.

The parties agree to negotiate in good faith always keeping in mind that the
benefits to the shareholders of both companies are foremost.

Initial agreement is hereby confirmed that both parties wish to accomplish the
agreement in the quickest possible manner and will use their best efforts to
accomplish the due diligence in a timely manner.

Either party has the right to back out of negotiations at any time without cause
until the time that the desired transaction is closed.

We agree on this date to the terms stated above.

For The Kart Store Inc.                     For Bowman Leisure Karts Ltd.

-----------------------------               --------------------------
Victor Hollman, President                   Victor Hollman, Managing Dir.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S. SECTION 1350, AS
                         ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned chief financial officer of Tom's
Foods Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

(1) the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the twelve weeks ended March
27, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the periods presented in the Report.

Dated: May 11, 2004

                                          /s/ Sharon M. Sanders
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Name: Sharon M. Sanders
                                          Title: Acting Chief Financial Officer

                                       20
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Celebrating the Faces of Flight","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Po4NExd1CN\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/celebrating-the-faces-of-flight\/\">Celebrating the Faces of Flight<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/celebrating-the-faces-of-flight\/embed\/#?secret=Po4NExd1CN\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Celebrating the Faces of Flight” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Po4NExd1CN\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/faces-of-flight.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":459}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cr−00282

Honorable Jorge L. Alonso

John Brown, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, February 22, 2022:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso as to John Brown: In light

of Defendant's change of plea, Pretrial conference previously set for 2/24/22 and Jury trial

previously set for 3/7/22 are stricken. Sentencing hearing remains set for 2/25/22 at 2:00

p.m. This hearing will be held in person. Notice mailed by Judge's staff (lf, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cr-00282 Document #: 144 Filed: 02/22/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:603
EXHIBIT 32.36

 

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven B. Hildebrand, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

/s/ Steven B. Hildebrand

Steven B. Hildebrand

Chief Financial Officer

February 26, 2007

 

 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. and will be retained by Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### John L. Cruch *v.*John E. Smith.

Pleading — Amendments—New Issues.

The refusal of the court to permit new issues to be formed, amended pleadings was proper.

APPEAL PROM HARLAN CIRCUIT COURT.

March 19, 1872.

*L. Farner, for appellant.*

Opinion of ti-ie Court by

Judge Hardin :

The refusal of the Court to permit new issue to be formed, by by amended pleading-, and its reference of the case rto a commissioner, were both proper under the decision of this court; and whether there was any irregularity or not in the confirmation of the report the judgment rendered, in abating the note by the value of the 100 acres of land, is as favorable to the appellant as the evidence would authorize or justify; and we perceive no substantial ground for reversing that judgment.

It is therefore affirmed.
#### HUNT et al. v. DODGE.

No. 2023.

District Court, D. Connecticut

July 11, 1947.

Nevas & Nevas, and Leo Nevas, all of South Norwalk, Conn., for plaintiffs.

Goldstein & Peck, and Bernard S. Peck, all of Bridgeport, Conn., for defendant.

HINCKS, District Judge.

The defendant Dodge is a citizen of Michigan: there he is domiciled and maintains a permanent home. But in addition he owns and staffs a farm in Greenwich, Connecticut, where he spends an average of fifty days yearly: also an estate in England. The question is whether Dodge is a “nonresident” of Connecticut within the meaning of the Removal Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 71, which in diversity cases allows removal from a State Court by a defendant or defendants therein “being nonresidents of that State.”

The reported cases treat the term “nonresident” synonymously with “noncitizen”, as far as the Removal Statute is concerned. Best v. Great Northern R., D.C.Mont., 1917, 243 F. 789; Kinsel et ux v. Pickens, D.C. W.D.Tex., 1938, 25 F.Supp. 455.

In 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, in a footnote, No. 7 on page 3492, two “contra holdings” are cited. Rich v. Corno Mills Co., D.C.N.D.Iowa, 1924, 300 F. 236; and Davidson v. Montana-Dakota Power Co., D.C.N.D., 1927, 22 F.2d 688. However, neither of these cases appears to be applicable here: both deal with men who had abandoned former homes and moved into new States where they set up homes for their families. Thus, the defendant in neither of these cases could be said to be only a temporary resident of the new State: in fact they, for all intents and purposes, might be deemed to have acquired new domiciles and new citizenship. Cf. Bradwell v. State, 16 Wall. 130, 21 L.Ed. 442. Indeed, the Davidson opinion cites with approval an earlier Supreme Court decision, Reynolds v. Adden, 136 U.S. 348, 10 S.Ct. 843, 34 L.Ed. 360, where the court said: “A citizen of one state, temporarily residing in another state, may remove a cause of action on the ground of diverse citizenship.” 22 F.2d 688, at page 689.

*625It is perhaps worth noting, although not determinative on the precise question here involved, that a similar (but not identical) problem relating to the Venue Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 112(a) has received a similar solution. An “inhabitant” or “resident”, for purposes of that Act, is deemed to mean “neither more nor less than legal domicile, as a result of which jurisdiction except by consent is confined to the district in the State of which one or the other of the parties is a citizen.” King v. Wall & Beaver Street Corporation, 79 U.S. App.D.C. 234, 145 F.2d 377, at page 379. However, here, too, the problem seems not wholly free from confusion. Townsend v. Bueyrus-Erie Co., 10 Cir., 144 F.2d 106.

The cases cited by the plaintiff do not purport to construe or apply the Removal Act except Lee v. Chesapeake & Ohio R., 260 U.S. 653, 43 S.Ct. 230, 67 L.Ed. 443. In that case the nonresidence of the defendant corporation was recognized and its right of removal was confirmed.

It is therefore ordered that the motion be denied.