alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      10.8**


**ASSIGNMENT
      AGREEMENT**







This
      ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT (the “Assignment
      Agreement”) is made and entered into on this 6 day of June, 2006, between PIN
      PARTNERS PETROLEUM LTD, a company organized and existing under the laws of
      British Columbia (the “the Assignor”), and RANCHER ENERGY CORP., a company
      organized and existing under the laws of Nevada, USA.








**WITNESSETH:**





WHEREAS,
      the Assignor has certain rights and
      obligations under the Exploration & Development Agreement dated June 5th,
      2006 (hereinafter referred to as the "Broadview Dome Agreement"),
      and





WHEREAS,
      the Assignor wishes to assign all of
      its rights and obligations in the Broadview Dome Agreement to the Assignee,
      and





WHEREAS,
      the Assignee accepts such assignment
      and has agreed to be bound by the Broadview Dome Agreement,





NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual
      convenants and agreements contained herein, it is expressly agreed by the
      Assignor and the Assignee as follows:








1.
      The Assignor hereby assigns and transfers to
      the Assignee all of its rights and obligations in, to, and under the Broadview
      Dome Agreement, subject to all the terms and conditions thereof.





2.
      The Assignee hereby agrees to assume all of
      the Assignor's rights and obligations under the Broadview Dome
      Agreement.




3.
      The Assignor reaffirms and represents that
      the Broadview Dome Agreement is valid and in full force and effect, and that
      the
      representations and warranties contained in the Broadview Dome Agreement are
      true and correct on the date hereof.





4.
      As consideration for the assignment of the Broadview Dome Agreement, the
      Assignee agrees to (i) pay to the Assignor U.S.$ 250,000 within ninety (90)
      days
      from the date of this Assignment Agreement, and (ii) grant to the Assignor
      an
      overriding royalty interest in the sum of four percent (4%) from the Rancher
      share of hydrocarbons to be exploited pursuant to the Broadview Dome Agreement.





5.
      By executing this Assignment Agreement, the
      Assignor and Assignee confirm (a) their intention to execute and deliver as
      promptly as practicable any other agreements with respect to this Assignment
      Agreement, and (b) to obtain the approval, agreement, and consent of their
      respective Boards of Directors or governing bodies with respect to this
      Assignment Agreement.





6.
      This Assignment Agreement shall be governed
      by the laws of the State of Montana, without giving effect to the principles
      of
      conflicts of law thereof.





-
          2 -




IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the Assignor and the
      Assignee have executed this Assignment Agreement on the date first written
      above.









**PIN
      PARTNERS PETROLEUM LTD**





By:
      _________________________


Name:


Title:








**RANCHER
      ENERGY CORP.**








By: 
/s/
      John Works


Name:
      John
      Works


Title:
      President
& CEO
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Gary J. Jordan","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/garyjjordan\/","title":"The Search for Life","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ASH4LvCyOq\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/houston-we-have-a-podcast\/the-search-for-life\/\">The Search for Life<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/houston-we-have-a-podcast\/the-search-for-life\/embed\/#?secret=ASH4LvCyOq\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“The Search for Life” — NASA\" data-secret=\"ASH4LvCyOq\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/parentbody_impact_0.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":225}
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 33

Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 21, 1997

Mr. FAZIO of California submitted the following resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating minority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Member be, and

2 he is hereby, elected to the following standing committee:

3 COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE: Mr. Sawyer of Ohio, to

4 rank directly below Mr. Engel of New York.

Æ
Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 1 of 28 PageID #:159

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 2 of 28 PageID #:160

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 3 of 28 PageID #:161

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 4 of 28 PageID #:162

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 5 of 28 PageID #:163

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 6 of 28 PageID #:164

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 7 of 28 PageID #:165

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 8 of 28 PageID #:166

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 9 of 28 PageID #:167

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 10 of 28 PageID #:168

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 11 of 28 PageID #:169

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 12 of 28 PageID #:170

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 13 of 28 PageID #:171

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 14 of 28 PageID #:172

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 15 of 28 PageID #:173

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 16 of 28 PageID #:174

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 17 of 28 PageID #:175

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 18 of 28 PageID #:176

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 19 of 28 PageID #:177

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 20 of 28 PageID #:178

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 21 of 28 PageID #:179

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 22 of 28 PageID #:180

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 23 of 28 PageID #:181

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 24 of 28 PageID #:182

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 25 of 28 PageID #:183

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 26 of 28 PageID #:184

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 27 of 28 PageID #:185

Case: 1:20-cv-02807 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 28 of 28 PageID #:186
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Rachel Hoover","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/rlhoove1\/","title":"NASA Hosts Unveiling of Plans for New Silicon Valley Innovation Hub","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ccXTd0v4Hf\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/nasa-hosts-unveiling-of-plans-for-new-silicon-valley-innovation-hub\/\">NASA Hosts Unveiling of Plans for New Silicon Valley Innovation Hub<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/nasa-hosts-unveiling-of-plans-for-new-silicon-valley-innovation-hub\/embed\/#?secret=ccXTd0v4Hf\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Hosts Unveiling of Plans for New Silicon Valley Innovation Hub” — NASA\" data-secret=\"ccXTd0v4Hf\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/acd20-0075-010.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
**EXHIBIT 23.1(i)**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the previously filed Registration Statements Nos. 333-139703 and 333-140787 on Form S-8 of St. Bernard Software, Inc. of our report dated March 19, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements of St. BernardSoftware, Inc., appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/S/    SQUAR, MILNER, PETERSON, MIRANDA & WILLIAMSON, LLP 

San Diego, California 

March 19, 2008
#### John W. Smith *v.*James M. Harrison.

Vendor and Purchaser — Parol Agreement as to Lien.

A vendee being present when the deed is written and accepts it after acknowledgment, a parol agreement to waive the lien for the purchase money must be regarded as having been changed.

*318Vendor and Purchaser — Lien Reserved in Deed — Constructive Notice.

If a party purchases land with constructive notice of a vendor’s lien, the law furnishes no means of escape from the burden.

APPEAL FROM LOGAN CIRCUIT COURT.

May 11, 1871.

*A. C. Rhea, W. W. Bush, for appellant.*

*Bowden, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

When the deed to Smith was written he was present, and after it was acknowledged he accepted it, and must have known its contents, if he did not it was certainly his own fault, and if there had been a parol agreement between Smith & Plammon that the lien for the unpaid purchase price should be waived, that agreement must be regardede as having been changed, and the one expressed in the deed substituted in its place.

But if that were not so the parol evidence is wholly insufficient to establish the alleged mistake, and to reform the deed.

Powell purchased with constructive notice at least of the vendor’s lien on the land, and the law furnishes no means of escape from the burden.

Wherefore the judgment must be *affirmed.*
#### *A.*Heheman *v.*Samuel B. Snead, etc.

Partition — Apportionment of Cost of improvement — Action to Recover— Necessary Parties.

All persons who by apportionment are to pay any part of the cost of improvements, for which liens are given, shall be made parties to any proceedings for the enforcement of such liens, unless they have paid their part of the cost agreeable to the apportionment, which fact shall be alleged in the petition.

*440APPEAL PROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT.

June 15, 1871.

*Russell, for appellant.*

*Coke & Argegast, for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay :

The provisions of the act approved March 9, 1868, 2d Vol., Acts 1867-68, page 410, certainly prevent this case from coming within the principles governing the case of *Hydes, etc., v. Joyce.*

The 32d section of said act requires that all persons who, by apportionment, are to pay any part of the costs of improvements for which liens are given by sections-23, 24, 25, 26 and 45, shall be made-parties to any proceedings for the enforcement of such liens, unless they have paid their part of the costs agreeable to the apportionment, “which fact shall be alleged in the petition.” This allegation is properly made in the petition of appellee, but is specifically denied by the answer of the appellant.

The legislature saw proper to make the issue thus raised a material one. If any person liable by the apportionment to pay any part of the costs of the improvement by appellee had not paid the same and was not made a party defendant, the onus was upon the complaint to make out his cause of action by proof. Hence, in our opinion, the answer presented a good defense, and the court erred in sustaining the demurrer thereto.

Wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
# ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23-0426
JESUS VILLANUEVA,

Petitioner and Appellant,

v. STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee. 

# F" D AUG 15 2023
Bowen Greerevoodurt Clerk of Supierne Co

f Mor1t3 ,10 State o ORDER

Jesus Villanueva has filed a verified Petition for an Out-of-TimeAppeal, indicating that he failed to file the Notice of Appeal timely due to his disabilities of dyslexia and dysgraphia. He provides a copy of the final judgment and has served opposing counsel. Villanueva also moves for counsel. Villanueva seeks to appeal a June 21, 20231 Order denying his petition for postconviction relief, issued in the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County. M. R. App. P. 4(6) allows this Court to grant an out-of-time appeal "[i]n the infrequent harsh case and under extraordinary circumstances amounting to a gross miscarriage ofjustice[1" Villanueva's appeal is timely. He has sixty days from the date ofthe court's order to file an appeal. M. R. App. P. 4(5)(a)(i). Villanueva had until August 20, 2023, to file a timelyappeal. We concludethat Villanuevahasdemonstratedextraordinarycircumstances to warrant granting his Petition. Villanueva, however, is not entitled to appointment ofcounsel in this appeal. There is no right to the appointment of counsel in a postconviction proceeding for relief. The District Court's Order initially indicated that it was signed by the District Court Judge on June 21, 2022. The District Court has since amended its Order. 08/15/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0426Villanueva represented himself in the District Court. Although a court may order the

assignment ofcounsel under the circumstances outlined in § 46-8-104, MCA, Villanueva has not demonstrated that extraordinary circumstances exist to justify appointment of counsel, pursuant to § 46-8-104(3), MCA. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Villanueva's Petition for an Out-of-Time Appeal is GRANTED. The Clerk ofthe Supreme Court is directed to file Villanueva's submitted Notice ofAppeal as ofthis Order's date. ITISFURTHERORDERED that Villanueva'sMotion forAppointmentofCounsel is DENIED. The Clerk is also directed to provide a copy ofthis Order to counsel ofrecord and to Jesus Villanueva along with a copy ofthis Court's Civil Appellate Handbook. DATED this I 6

- day ofAugust, 2023.

2
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 237

To limit the access of lobbyists to the Hall of the House, and for other

purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 18, 1997

Ms. WOOLSEY (for himself, Mrs. LOWEY, Ms. DEGETTE, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr.

TORRES, Mr. DELAHUNT, Ms. CHRISTIAN-GREEN, Ms. FURSE, Mr.

STARK, Mr. RUSH, Mr. BARRETT of Wisconsin, Mr. TIERNEY, Mr.

OLVER, Mr. LUTHER, Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi, Mr. ENGEL, Mr.

GREEN, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. FORD, Mr. KENNEDY of Massachusetts, Mr.

FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. VENTO, and Mr. SHAYS) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

To limit the access of lobbyists to the Hall of the House,

and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That clause 3 of rule XXXII of the Rules

2 of the House of Representatives is amended to read as

3 follows:

4 ‘‘3. (a) Except as provided by paragraph (b), ex5 Members of the House of Representatives, former Par6 liamentarians of the House, and former elected officers

7 and former elected minority employees of the House shall

8 be entitled to the privilege of admission to the Hall of the
2

•HRES 237 IH

1 House and rooms leading thereto only if they do not have

2 any direct personal or pecuniary interest in any legislative

3 measure pending before the House or reported by any

4 committee of the House.

5 ‘‘(b) No individual who is a lobbyist registered under

6 section 308 of the Federal Regulation of Lobbying Act

7 may be admitted to the Hall of the House except an ex8 Member to attend ceremonial functions attended by other

9 ex-Members.

10 ‘‘(c) The Speaker shall promulgate such regulations

11 as may be necessary to implement the provisions of this

12 rule and to ensure its enforcement.’’.

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Flat Orville Template","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"DqYuJDAFtJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/flat-orville-template\/\">Flat Orville Template<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/flat-orville-template\/embed\/#?secret=DqYuJDAFtJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Flat Orville Template” — NASA\" data-secret=\"DqYuJDAFtJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/flat-orville.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":459}
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 626 1

ROGER EARL COLEY , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. FRANK PERRY , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. Joe L. Webster , Magistrate Judge. ( 1:1 7

- cv
- 0 0008

- TDS

- JLW )

Submitted : May 2 5 , 2017 Decided: May 31, 2017

Before MOTZ , THACKER , and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Roger Earl Coley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Roger Earl Coley seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order and
recommendation denying Coley’s request for counsel and recommending the action be

co nstrued as a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition and dismissed without prejudice . This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order Coley seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and arg ument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
THIRD AMENDMENT
TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




---



##### 








---



##### 



REIT:
MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC.By:
    /s/ R. Steven HamnerName:
    R. Steven HamnerTitle:
    Executive Vice President and CFOOPERATING PARTNERSHIP:
MPT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
By:   Medical Properties Trust, LLC
Its:   General Partner
By:   Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
Its:   Sole MemberBy:
    /s/ R. Steven HamnerName:
    R. Steven HamnerTitle:
    Executive Vice President and CFOEXECUTIVE:/s/ Edward K. Aldag, Jr.Edward K. Aldag, Jr.