alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Illinois Republican Party, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03489

Honorable Sara L. Ellis

J.B. Pritzker

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, June 4, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: Telephone Conference set for

9/9/2021 at 9:30 AM for ruling on motion to dismiss. Attorneys/Parties should appear for

the hearing by calling the Toll−Free Number: (866) 434−5269, Access Code: 8087837.

Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing (use toll

free number). Please be sure to keep your phone on mute when you are not speaking.

Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition

against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of

these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media

credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any

other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice(rj, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03489 Document #: 38 Filed: 06/04/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:298
Exhibit 12.2



I, Judith T. Mazvihwa, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of:   Logan Resources Ltd.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of

a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the

statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements

were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this

Annual Report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial

information included in this report, fairly present in all material

respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of

the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





Date: October 5, 2005



Judith T. Mazvihwa

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of United PanAm Financial Corp. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ray Thousand, certify in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (a) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto signed this Certification as of July 31, 2006.



/s/    RAY THOUSANDRay ThousandChief Executive Officer and President
{"id":11777,"count":10,"description":"","link":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/organizations\/ocio\/","name":"Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO)","slug":"ocio","taxonomy":"category","parent":2667,"meta":{"redirect":"","media-tag":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/11777"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/taxonomies\/category"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/2667"}],"wp:post_type":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts?categories=11777"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/hdsnav?categories=11777"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic?categories=11777"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/gallery?categories=11777"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/reference?categories=11777"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/mission?categories=11777"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/feature?categories=11777"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press-release?categories=11777"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/stem-content?categories=11777"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/people?categories=11777"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/event?categories=11777"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/image-article?categories=11777"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/nasa-blog?categories=11777"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages?categories=11777"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/migration?categories=11777"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/podcast?categories=11777"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

VALENTINO TELFORT

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3648

[ March 14, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Elizabeth A. Scherer , Judge; L.T. Case No.

062012CF011334A88810

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul Edward Petillo, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Joseph D.

Coronato, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., T AYLOR and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 5, 2019

No. 04-18-00514-CR

Ramiro CASTILLO-RAMIREZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 381st Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-CR-271

The Honorable Martin Chiuminatto, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice 

Beth Watkins, Justice 

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

State’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Reconsideration En Banc is 

hereby GRANTED.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of September, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
$3

FILED 6/1/2020

THOMAS G. BRUTON CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

Case: 1:20-cr-00257 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/01/20 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:1
Case: 1:20-cr-00257 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/01/20 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:2
Case: 1:20-cr-00257 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/01/20 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:3
Case: 1:20-cr-00257 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/01/20 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:4
#### Samuel Flicker, Appellant, *v.*Sadie G. Ragan, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

December 11, 1925.

Brokers — real estate broker — rule that broker must procure purchaser financially able not applicable where contract of purchase executed.

' The rule that a broker, in order to earn his commission, must produce a purchaser who is financially able, does not apply, where an enforcible agreement has been entered into for the purchase of the property.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court, Borough of The Bronx, entered in favor of the defendant,

*Stanley Garten,*for the appellant.

*Sidney B. Cardozo [Barnett J. Monka*of counsel], for the respondent.

Per Curiam.

The dismissal of the complaint was erroneous. The rule that a broker, in order to earn his commission, must produce a purchaser who is financially able does not apply where an enforcible agreement has been entered into for the purchase of the property. The seller is deemed to have indicated his satisfaction with such purchaser’s financial ability by executing the contract. *(Corbin*v. *Mechanics & Traders’ Bank,*121 App. Div. 744; *Alt*v. *Doscher,*102 id. 344; *Slocum*v. *Ostrander,*141 id, 380; affd., 205 N. Y. 617; *Jaffe*v. *Lederer,*113 Misc. 356.) The judgment is, therefore, reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to the appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, Bijur, Levy and Churchill, JJ.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Matthew Stewart-Bellazer,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Conn Appliances Incorporated, 

Defendant. 

No. CV-16-00055-TUC-RM

ORDER 

 Pending before the Court is the Parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice. 

(Doc. 20.) Good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation for Dismissal is approved. This 

case is dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to bear his or its own costs and 

attorney’s fees. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 

 Dated this 10th day of February, 2017. 

Honorable Rosemary Márquez

United States District Judge

Case 4:16-cv-00055-RM Document 21 Filed 02/10/17 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION 

BCBSM, INC., et al., 

Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, 

v. 

WALGREEN CO. and WALGREENS BOOTS 

ALLIANCE, INC., 

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. 

Case No. 1:20-cv-01853 

Honorable Virginia M. Kendall 

Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan 

Consolidated with: 

Case No. 1:20-cv-04738 

Case No. 1:20-cv-03332 

Case No. 1:20-cv-01929 

Case No. 1:20-cv-04940 

PLAINTIFFS/COUNTER-DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO DISMISS WALGREEN CO.’S COUNTERCLAIM 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants 

respectfully request that this Court dismiss Counter-Plaintiff Walgreen Co.’s (“Walgreens”) 

Counterclaim (Dkt. 149) with prejudice. Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants are entitled to dismissal 

because Walgreens’ Counterclaim fails to state a cause of action upon which relief may be 

granted. Specifically, Walgreens has not and cannot plead actual knowledge, a requisite element 

of an aiding and abetting claim under Illinois law. 

In compliance with the Court’s General Order 21-0027 In Re: Suspension of Local Rules 

5.2(F) and 5.3(B) and Continued Authorization for Email Filings by Pro Se Litigations (Aug. 3, 

2021), Plaintiffs will not notice this motion for in-person presentment at this time and will await 

notification from the presiding judge as to the need, if any, for a hearing by electronic means or 

in-court proceeding. 

WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above, as well as in the accompanying 

Memorandum of Law, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants respectfully request that this Court grant its 

Motion to Dismiss Walgreen Co.’ Counterclaim with prejudice. 
2

Dated: September 7, 2021 Respectfully submitted, 

 By: /s/ Kelly H. Hibbert 

David L. Applegate (IL Bar #3122573) 

Matthew A. Blumenreich (IL Bar #6329458) 

Williams Montgomery & John Ltd. 

Suite 6800 Willis Tower 

233 S. Wacker Drive 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

Telephone: (312) 443-3200 

Facsimile: (312) 630-8500 

dla@willmont.com 

mab@willmont.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Kent A. Gardiner (D.C. Bar No. 432081)* 

Stephen J. McBrady (D.C. Bar No. 978847)* 

Kelly H. Hibbert (D.C. Bar No. 1006010)* 

Justin D. Kingsolver (N.D. Ill. Bar No. 6320926) 

Crowell & Moring LLP 

1001 Pennsylvania Ave. NW 

Washington, D.C. 20004 

Telephone: (202) 624-2500 

Facsimile: (202) 628-5116 

KGardiner@crowell.com 

SMcBrady@crowell.com 

KHibbert@crowell.com 

JKingsolver@crowell.com 

*Admitted pro hac vice 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, Kelly H. Hibbert, an attorney authorized to practice before this Court, hereby certify 

that the foregoing was electronically filed on September 7, 2021, and will be served 

electronically via the Court’s ECF Notice system upon the registered parties and counsel of 

record. 

Dated: September 7, 2021 /s/ Kelly H. Hibbert 

Kelly H. Hibbert
Exhibit 10.7  Schedule of the Owners of Company-Managed Texas Roadhouse Restaurants and the Interests Held by Directors, Executive Officers and 5% Stockholders Who Are Parties to Limited Partnership Agreements and Operating Agreements  As of December 28, 2010  Entity Name

Restaurant Location

Percentage of   Holdings Interest

Actual Management Fee   Charged

Percentage Owned by   Executive Officers,   Directors & 5%   StockholdersTexas Roadhouse of Billings, LLC

Billings,   MT

5
%
0.5
%
57
%Roadhouse of Bossier City, LLC

Bossier   City, LA

5
%
0.5
%
65
%Texas Roadhouse of Brownsville, Ltd.

Brownsville,   TX

5.09
%
0.5
%
91.84
%Texas Roadhouse of Everett, LLC

Everett,   MA

5
%
0.5
%
50
%Roadhouse of Fargo, LLC

Fargo,   ND

5.05
%
0.5
%
88.89
%Roadhouse of Longmont, LLC

Longmont,   CO

5
%
0.5
%
47.5
%Roadhouse of McKinney, Ltd.

McKinney,   TX

5
%
0.5
%
62
%Roadhouse of New Berlin, LLC

New   Berlin, WI

5
%
0.5
%
62
%Roadhouse of Omaha, LLC

Omaha,   NE

5.49
%
0.5
%
79.67
%Texas Roadhouse of Port Arthur, Ltd.

Port   Arthur, TX

5
%
0.5
%
91.5
%Roadhouse of Temple, Ltd.

Temple,   TX

5
%
0.5
%
77
%Roadhouse of Wichita, LLC

Wichita,   KS

5
%
0.5
%
55.1
%
#### Sybert and Others, Commissioners, *v.*Ellis, in Error.

SUIT by *Ellis*against *McCartney, Sybert,*and *Shawl,*commissioners of *Madison*county, for work and labour done for the county. Judgment by default. *Held,*that the judgment should show that the amount was only to be collected from the property of the county.
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 20

- 13264
Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus FRANK DOUGLAS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 3:18

- cr

- 00005

- CAR

- CHW

- 1

____________________ USCA11 Case: 20-13264 Date Filed: 03/01/2022 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 20

- 13264

Before L UCK , L AGOA , and B LACK , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Frank Douglas pled guilty to one count of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), for which t he district court sentenced him to 240 months’ imprisonment and ordered him to pay $6,700 in restitution. Douglas appealed the district court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea before sentencing

. S hortly after the parties completed briefing, however, Douglas passed away.

We review questions of jurisdiction de novo
, and we may raise the issue sua sponte

. United States v. Lopez , 562 F.3d 1309, 1311 (11th Cir. 2009). “It is a well

- settled principle of law that all criminal proceedings abate ab initio when the defendant dies pending direct appeal of his criminal conviction.” United States v. Schumann , 861 F.2d 1234, 1236 (1 1th Cir. 1988). In such a scenario, we must dismiss the appeal as moot and remand to the district court with directions to vacate the judgment and dismiss the indictment. See id . That the district court ordered the deceased defendant to pay restitution do es not affect this result. United States v. Logal
, 106 F.3d 1547, 1551

- 52 (11th Cir. 1997). Because Douglas passed away shortly after the parties completed briefing, his appeal is moot . Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal and remand with instructions to vacate the judgment and dismiss the indictment against Douglas

. DISMISSED. USCA11 Case: 20-13264 Date Filed: 03/01/2022 Page: 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.6.3

Eastern Division

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03758

Honorable Thomas M. Durkin

Long Leaf Trading Group, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, July 27, 2022:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: A telephone status

hearing is set for 9/12/2022 at 9:00 a.m., but the Court expects to vacate the status hearing

if any party comes in on a motion before that date. To join the telephone conference, dial

877−402−9757, Access Code 4410831. Members of the public and media will be able to

call in to listen to this hearing. Please be sure to keep your phone on mute when you are

not speaking. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general

prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings.

Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued

media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or

any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice. (ecw, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 107 Filed: 07/27/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2799
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 323 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                 House Calendar No. 136
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 323

                          [Report No. 105-402]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 2159) making appropriations for foreign operations, export 
 financing, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 
                   30, 1998, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 12, 1997

 Mr. Diaz-Balart, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 2159) making appropriations for foreign operations, export 
 financing, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 
                   30, 1998, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
2159) making appropriations for foreign operations, export financing, 
and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1998, and 
for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report 
and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall 
be considered as read.
                                     





                                                 House Calendar No. 136

105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 323

                          [Report No. 105-402]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 2159) making appropriations for foreign operations, export 
 financing, and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 
                   30, 1998, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 12, 1997

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

BOBBETH MORGAN

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 804

[ February 8, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael I. Rothschild , Judge; L.T. Case No. 15

- 11899CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and James W. McIntire, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, (withdrawn as counsel after filing brief), and Michael J. Entin, P.A., and Frank A. Maister, P.A., Fort

L auderdale, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., G ROSS and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Order No. 1954]

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

The Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board (the Board) has considered the application (docketed 7/1/2014) submitted by the Board of Park Commissioners, Decatur Park District, grantee of FTZ 245, requesting reissuance of the grant of authority for said zone to the Economic Development Corporation of Decatur & Macon County, which has accepted such reissuance subject to approval by the FTZ Board. Upon review, the Board finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest.

Therefore, the Board approves the application and recognizes the Economic Development Corporation of Decatur & Macon County as the new grantee for Foreign-Trade Zone 245, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of October 2014.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,

Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

[FR Doc. 2014-26276 Filed 11-4-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P