alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered January 13, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00930

- CR

ALICE ANNETTE STEELE

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F08

- 45120

- M



### O RDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant

has been deprived of the clerk’s and reporter’s records because of ineffective counsel, indigence,

or for any other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant des ires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs for the clerk’s and reporter’s records. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment
of costs, the trial court shal l make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can

be filed.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a supplemental record, containing the written

findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY

DAYS of the date of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the supplemental record is

re ceived, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

Glenn Williams, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

City of Chicago, et al., 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

No. 1:20-cv-00420 

Hon. Virginia M. Kendall 

MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF UNSERVED DEFENDANTS 

Defendant Tivity Health Services, LLC (“Tivity”), by and through its counsel, respectfully 

moves this Court for the entry of an Order dismissing Tivity Health, Inc., Healthways, Inc., and 

Healthways Services LLC as unserved defendants in this action. In support of this motion, Tivity 

states as follows: 

1. On September 2, 2021, a telephonic status hearing was held in this case. 

2. At that hearing, counsel for Plaintiffs stated, “[W]e are prepared to go forward with 

a dismissal of all . . . non-served defendants other than Mr. Emanuel[.]” (Dkt. 123 at 9-10.) 

3. The Court then ordered, “Oral motion to dismiss all unserved Defendants with the 

exception of Rahm Emanuel is granted. You shall file a motion on the docket identifying those 

unserved entities and/or persons by tomorrow, 5:00 pm, so that we can get your docket cleaned 

up.” (Id. at 10; see also Dkt. 118.) 

4. As of the filing of this Motion, Plaintiffs have yet to file any motion identifying the

unserved entities and/or persons that Plaintiffs are dismissing from the case. 

Case: 1:20-cv-00420 Document #: 132 Filed: 09/23/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:2542
2 

5. As such, Tivity identifies Tivity Health, Inc., Healthways, Inc., and Healthways 

Services LLC as entities named in Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint that have never been served in 

this case. 

WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above, Defendant Tivity Health Services, LLC 

respectfully requests that this Court grant this motion and enter the proposed Order that Tivity has 

submitted to the Court via email concurrently with the filing of this motion. 

Dated: September 23, 2021 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ David C. Layden

David M. Greenwald 

David C. Layden 

Brenna J. Field 

JENNER & BLOCK LLP 

353 N. Clark St. 

Chicago, Illinois 60654 

Telephone: 312 222-9350 

Facsimile: 312 923-2385 

Dgreenwald@jenner.com 

Dlayden@jenner.com 

Bfield@jenner.com 

Counsel for Tivity Health Services, LLC 

Case: 1:20-cv-00420 Document #: 132 Filed: 09/23/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:2543
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 and Northern District of Illinois LR 5.5. the undersigned, an 

attorney of record in this case, hereby certifies that on September 23, 2021, a true and correct copy 

of the foregoing was filed electronically by CM/ECF, which caused notice to be sent to all counsel 

of record.

/s/ David C. Layden

David C. Layden 

Case: 1:20-cv-00420 Document #: 132 Filed: 09/23/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:2544
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Tariq Abney

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03621

Honorable Sara L. Ellis

Board of Education of the City of Chicago

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, August 25, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: Telephone Conference set for

8/26/2020 at 9:30 AM. Mailed notice(rj, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03621 Document #: 16 Filed: 08/25/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:66
#### Hugh Prisler *v.*A. Shwabeston.

Vendor and Purchaser — Deficit—Knowledge of Vendor.

The appellant knew when he made the sale that the tract did not contain two hundred and fifty acres. It was his duty to disclose this fact to the appellee at the time he sold Mm the land.

APPEAL PROM HARDIN CIRCUIT COURT.

October 14, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

We perceive no error in the judgment rendered by the court below. The appellant knew when he made the sale of the land to the appellee that the tract did not contain as much as two hundred and fifty acres. He himself then had a deed of record for the same land and by this deed his vendor conveys to him only two hundred and five acres. It was his duty to have dis*258closed this fact to the appellee at the time he sold him the land; this he failed to do, and should now be held responsible for the deficit.

*Stratton, for appellant.*

*Bush, for appellees.*

The judgment of the court below is affirmed.
#### Enos, Appellee, *v.*Enos, Appellant.

(No. 4022

Decided December 5, 1947.)

*Mr. Horace 8. Kerr,*for appellee.

*Mr. B. N. Murray,*for appellant.

Wiseman, P. J.

This is an appeal on questions of' law from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court,. Division of Domestic Relations, of Franklin county,, granting a decree of divorce to the plaintiff and ordering a division of property.

Four grounds of error are assigned by the defendant, appellant herein, all of which require the review of the evidence. In effect the contention is made that' the judgment is contrary to the manifest weight of the-evidence, is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is-contrary to precedent.

The document filed in this court, designated a “bill of exceptions,” was not signed by the trial judge on. the ground that “it fails to embody the evidence sufficiently to give a true and full report.”

In the absence of a bill of exceptions, we are required to indulge the presumption that there was sufficient evidence presented to support the judgment.

As we find no error in the record, the judgment is-affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Mtt.t.er and Hornbeck, JJ., concur.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 148

Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 14, 1997

Mr. FAZIO of California submitted the following resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating minority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Members be, and

2 that they are hereby, elected to the following standing

3 committees of the House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Mr. Hinojosa and

5 Mr. Berry.

6 COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS: Mr. Rodriguez.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Mark R. Templeton, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Artisan Components, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June
30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Artisan Components, Inc.



By:

/s/    MARK R.
TEMPLETONMark R. Templeton President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Timberline Resources Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Randal Hardy, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|             |                                                     |                 
|------------ | --------------------------------------------------- | ----------------
|             |                                                     |                 
|             |                                                    
|             |                                                     |                 
|May 21, 2009 | By:                                                 | /s/ Randal Hardy
|             | Randal Hardy                                       
|             | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|             | Principal Executive and Financial Officer          



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Timberline Resources Corporation and will be retained by Timberline Resources Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.1

Eastern Division

Simon Pfeifer, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03116

Honorable Robert W. Gettleman

Loyola University Chicago

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, September 7, 2023:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Plaintiffs' Unopposed

Motion To Preliminarily Approve Class Action Settlement; Certify The Settlement Class;

Appoint Class Representatives, Class Counsel, And Settlement Administrator; Approve

Proposed Class Notice And Schedule Final Approval Hearing [68] is granted. Enter order.

Mailed notice (cn).

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03116 Document #: 70 Filed: 09/07/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:4730
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ming Hsieh, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Cogent, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: April 26, 2007



/S/    MING
HSIEHMing HsiehChief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1519

ELSAYED ELFEKY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District

Judge. (2:05-cv-00296-WDK)

Submitted: November 15, 2006 Decided: November 17, 2006

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elsayed Elfeky, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Travis Coberly,

VANDERVENTER & BLACK, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Elsayed Elfeky seeks to appeal from the entry of a

consent agreement in his civil action. See Elfeky v. United

States, 2:05-cv-00296-WDK (E.D. Va. Apr. 14, 2006). Absent

circumstances not present here, we will not entertain an appeal

from a consent judgment. See Cohen v. Va. Elec. & Power Co., 788

F.2d 247, 249 (4th Cir. 1986); Thonen v. Jenkins, 455 F.2d 977, 977

(4th Cir. 1972). Accordingly, we dismiss Elfeky’s appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.34

 

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven B. Hildebrand, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

/s/ Steven B. Hildebrand

Steven B. Hildebrand

Chief Financial Officer

February 26, 2007

 

 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. and will be retained by Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 1, 2018

No. 04-18-00738-CV

IN RE JJH, A CHILD,

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-PA-02764

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The trial court signed a final judgment on September 11, 2018. Therefore, because this is 

an accelerated appeal, the notice of appeal was due to be filed October 1, 2018. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 26.1(b). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on October 16, 

2018. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on October 11, 2018. Although 

appellant filed a notice of appeal within the fifteen-day grace period allowed by Rule 26.3, she

did not file a motion for extension of time. 

A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good 

faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen-day 

grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. 

Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). However, 

appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely 

manner. See id.; TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1)(C). 

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant file, within fifteen days from the date of this 

order, a response presenting a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a 

timely manner. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, the appeal will be 

dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). All other appellate deadlines are suspended until further 

order of this court.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of November, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 242 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 25, 1997.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2266) making 
appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 1998, and for other purposes. All points of order against the 
conference report and against its consideration are waived. The conference 
report shall be considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) Case No. 20 CR 299 

 ) 

 v. ) Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr. 

 ) 

HARDY BROWNER ) 

JOINT STATUS REPORT

The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by JOHN R. LAUSCH, JR., United 

States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, and defendant HARDY 

BROWNER, by his attorneys Molly Armour and Joshua G. Herman, respectfully 

submits this Status Report, pursuant to the Court’s Order of April 1, 2021 (R. # 55).

On June 17, 2020, the defendant was indicted on one count of violating Title 

18, United States Code, Section 1001(a)(2). On or about July 6, 2020, after a detention 

hearing before Judge Valdez, the defendant was ordered to remain in federal custody.

On or about June 18, 2020, August 6, 2020, February 17, 2021, March 10, 2021, 

April 6, 2021, and May 12, 2021, the government produced a total of approximately 

17,820 pages of documents on a total of 21 discs. The government has also produced, 

on or about February 19, 2021, classified discovery to Mr. Herman. The government 

anticipates producing an additional round of classified discovery and is confirming 

with the FBI as to whether there is any outstanding unclassified discovery. The 

government recognizes its ongoing obligation to supplement these disclosures with 

new material as it becomes available. 

Case: 1:20-cr-00299 Document #: 56 Filed: 06/01/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:154
Since our last status, Mr. Browner was indicted in a new matter, United States 

v. Hardy Lee Browner, 21 CR 302, before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. 

 Respectfully submitted,

 JOHN R. LAUSCH, JR.

 United States Attorney

By: /s/ Barry Jonas 

BARRY JONAS

Assistant U.S. Attorney 

 219 South Dearborn St., Rm. 500

 Chicago, Illinois 60604

(312) 353-5300

/s/ Molly Armour 

MOLLY ARMOUR

Law Offices of Molly Armour

4050 N. Lincoln Avenue

Chicago, IL 60618

(773) 746-4849

Attorney for Defendant 

/s/ Joshua G. Herman 

JOSHUA G. HERMAN

53 West Jackson, Blvd. 

Suite 457

Chicago, IL 60604

(312) 909-0434

Attorney for Defendant

Case: 1:20-cr-00299 Document #: 56 Filed: 06/01/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:155
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66607-66608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26504]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

17 CFR Parts 232 and 249

[Release Nos. 33-9638A; 34-72982A; File No. S7-08-10]
RIN 3235-AK37


Asset-Backed Securities Disclosure and Registration; Correction

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are making technical corrections to rules that were 
published in the Federal Register on September 24, 2014 (79 FR 57184). 
The Commission adopted revisions to Regulation AB and other rules 
governing the offering process, disclosure, and reporting for asset-
backed securities.

DATES: Effective November 24, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: M. Hughes Bates, Attorney-Advisor, at 
(202) 551-3850; Division of Corporation Finance, Securities and 
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-3628.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2014-21375, published in the 
Federal Register on Wednesday, September 24, 2014 (79 FR 57184), the 
following corrections are made:


Sec.  232.101  [Corrected]

0
1. On page 57332, in the first column, 19th line, amendment 39.b, the 
instruction ``Adding paragraph (a)(1)(xiv)'' is corrected to read 
``Adding paragraph (a)(1)(xv)''.

0
2. On page 57332, in the first column, 35th line, paragraph designation 
``(xiv)'' is corrected to read ``(xv)''.

PART 249--[CORRECTED]

0
3. On page 57344, in the third column, 17th line, amendment 62.a is 
removed and amendments 62.b and 62.c are redesignated as amendments 
62.a and 62.b, respectively.

0
4. On page 57345, in the first column, 21st line, amendment 63.a is 
removed and the remaining amendment is redesignated as amendment 63.

[[Page 66608]]


0
5. On page 57345, in the first column, 57th line, amendment 64.c is 
removed and amendments 64.d, 64.e, 64.f, 64.g, 64.h, and 64.i are 
redesignated as amendments 64.c, 64.d, 64.e, 64.f, 64.g, and 64.h, 
respectively.

    Dated: November 3, 2014.
 Brent J. Fields,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-26504 Filed 11-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P