alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 460

Recognizing the 20th anniversary of the founding of the Vietnam Veterans

of America.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 5, 1998

Mr. WEYGAND submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the 20th anniversary of the founding of the

Vietnam Veterans of America.

Whereas 1998 marks the 20th anniversary of the founding of

the Vietnam Veterans of America;

Whereas the history of the Vietnam Veterans of America organization is a story of America’s gradual recognition of

the tremendous sacrifices of Vietnam-era veterans and

their families;

Whereas the Vietnam Veterans of America is dedicated to

serving its membership through advocacy for its membership;

Whereas the Vietnam Veterans of America provides public

and member awareness of critical issues affecting Vietnam-era veterans and their families;
2

•HRES 460 IH

Whereas the local grassroots efforts of Vietnam Veterans of

America in chapters across the country have greatly contributed to the quality of lives of veterans in our Nation’s

communities;

Whereas the Vietnam Veterans of America promotes its principles through volunteerism, professional advocacy, and

claims work; and

Whereas the future of the Vietnam Veterans of America relies not only on its past accomplishments, but on future

accomplishments of its membership that will ensure the

Vietnam Veterans of America remains a leader among

veterans advocacy organizations: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, that the House of Representatives—

2 (1) congratulates the Vietnam Veterans of

3 America on the occasion of the 20th anniversary of

4 its founding;

5 (2) commends Vietnam Veterans of America for

6 its advancement of veterans rights, which has set the

7 standard for other veterans organizations around the

8 country;

9 (3) asks all Americans to join in the recognition

10 of the Vietnam Veterans of America for 20 years of

11 advocacy of Vietnam veterans; and

12 (4) encourages the Vietnam Veterans of Amer13 ica to continue into the next millennium to represent

14 and promote the goals of its organization in the vet15 erans community and on Capitol Hill.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 351 Agreed to House (ATH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 351

 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 1998

 Mr. Fazio of California submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and that they are 
hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on Banking and Financial Services: Mr. Max Sandlin of 
Texas and Mr. Gregory Meeks of New York.
                                 <all>
```
1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60220

Summary Calendar

GEORGE DUNBAR PREWITT, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

LUTHER ALEXANDER, In his official capacity as a member of the

Washington county Board of Supervisors, Washington County,

Mississippi, ET AL.

Defendants,

LUTHER ALEXANDER, In his official capacity as a member of the

Washington County Board of Supervisors, Washington County,

Mississippi; JAMIE MCGOWIN, In his official capacity as a member of

the Washington County Board of Supervisors, Washington County,

Mississippi; ALFRED RANKINS, In his official capacity as a member

of the Washington County Board of Supervisors, Washington County,

Mississippi; LON PEPPER, In his official capacity as a member of

the Washington County Board of Supervisors, Washington County,

Mississippi; ELSIE ABRAHAM, In her official capacity as a member of

the Washington County Board of Supervisors, Washington County,

Mississippi; GEORGE T. KELLY, JR.; JEROME HAFTER; ANDREW ALEXANDER;

MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Mississippi

(4:94-CV94-B)

April 28, 1997
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

2

Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Finding that the district court did not abuse its discretion

in awarding attorney fees and sanctions against Appellant George

Dunbar Prewitt, Jr., we affirm. See Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx

Corp., 496 U.S. 384 (1990); Thomas v. Capital Security Services,

Inc., 836 F.2d 866 (5th Cir. 1988).

It is ORDERED that appellant’s motion to supplement the

appellant’s brief and reply brief by raising the jurisdictional

issue of standing of Jane Virden is DENIED.

AFFIRMED. MOTION DENIED.
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 161 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                  House Calendar No. 42
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 161

                          [Report No. 105-118]

    Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 1997

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
    Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI for a two-
thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported before June 7, 1997, providing for consideration or 
disposition of the bill (H.R. 1469) making emergency supplemental 
appropriations for recovery from natural disasters, and for overseas 
peacekeeping efforts, including those in Bosnia, for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 1997, and for other purposes, an amendment 
thereto, a conference report thereon, or an amendment reported in 
disagreement from a conference thereon.
                                     





                                                  House Calendar No. 42

105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 161

                          [Report No. 105-118]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

    Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 4, 1997

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Katie Konans","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/keatkin1\/","title":"Sun Series: How to Experience a Total Solar Eclipse","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"2lYV0eep2B\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/curious-universe\/sun-series-how-to-experience-a-total-solar-eclipse\/\">Sun Series: How to Experience a Total Solar Eclipse<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/curious-universe\/sun-series-how-to-experience-a-total-solar-eclipse\/embed\/#?secret=2lYV0eep2B\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Sun Series: How to Experience a Total Solar Eclipse” — NASA\" data-secret=\"2lYV0eep2B\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/curiousuniverse.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":330}
Exhibit 99.4

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Fire Retardant Corp., a
Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March
31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen F. Owens, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



                                     By  /s/  Stephen F. Owens
                                     -------------------------
                                     Stephen F. Owens
                                     Chief Financial Officer of
                                     American Fire Retardant Corp.
                                     May 15, 2003
#### Commonwealth of Kentucky *v.*John Lewis, etc.

Bail — Surrender in Open Court — No Order Necessary to Relieve Sureties From Liability on Bail Bond.

It is true the record does mot siiow that any order was made directing the sheriff to taire charge of the prisoner; the presumption arises from the acts of the judge.

APPEAL PROM ROWAN CIRCUIT COURT.

November 14, 1871.

*Attorney General, for appellant.*

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

The evidence as appears from the record shows that the prisoner was surrendered at the instance of the security, taken charge of by the court and placed in the custody of the sheriff. When the prisoner was placed in charge of the sheriff; all power over him by his surety ceased, and he was released from liability on his bond. It is true the record does not show that any order of court was made directing the sheriff to1 take charge of the accused, nor does the record show that it contains all the proceedings and evidence in. the case, and the presumption arises from the statement of the judge himself that then his act in releasing the surety was as provided by law. The judgment affirmed.
**June 23.** **2015 No.** **04-15-00342-CV VILLA** **DIJON CONDOMINIUM** **ASSOCIATION. INC.** **AND IMPL1CITY** **MANAGEMENT COMPANY,** **Appellants v.** **MARY WINTERS** **AND M1LA** **CHEATOM, Appellees** **From the** **166th Judicial** **District Court.** **Bexar County.** **Texas Trial** **Court No.** **2015-CI-03926 lonorable** **John D.** **Gabriel, Jr..** **Judge Presiding** 

### ORDER**This court** **has determined** **that this** **dispute is** **appropriate for** **referral to** **an Alternative** **Dispute Resolution** **(ADR) procedure.** **See TEX.** **ClV. Prac.** **REM. Code** **154.021 (Vcrnon** **2005). All** **further communications** **with this** **court by** **the parties** **regarding ADR** **shall be** **directed to** **the Clerk** **of the** **Court for** **any assistance** **in the** **mediation process.** **All parlies** **are ORDERED** **to respond** **in writing** **by July** **13, 2015** **stating: (1)** **the name,** **address, and** **fee schedule** **of the** **mediator of** **their choice;** **or (2)** **that they** **cannot agree** **on mediator,** **in which** **case the** **court will** **appoint one;** **or (3)** **any objection** **to mediation** **and the** **reasons for** **such objection.** **See id.** **154.022 (b).** **Provided the** **parties submit** **to mediation,** **this court** **will issue** **an order** **suspending all** **appellate deadlines** **for forty-five** **(45) days** **in order** **that the** **parties may** **concentrate on** **the scheduling** **and completion** **of the** **mediation process.** **Is it** **so ORDERED** **on June 23.** **2015.**

### Mari%n**Barnaul. Justice** 

## Io/l^**WBraffiSSffllilribiREOF. have** **hereunto set** **my hand** **and affixed** **the seal** **of the** **said court** **on**

## ^le,**Cleric**
Dismissed and Opinion Filed January 14, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05-14-00002-CV IN RE BILLY SIMS, Relator Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F-8795144

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Lang-Miers, and Myers Opinion by Justice Bridges Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus complaining that the trial court has failed to timely rule on his motion for appointment of counsel to assist him in postconviction habeas corpus matters. The facts and i ssues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. This Court does not have jurisdiction over relator’s petition. See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN
. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2010); In re Hampton , No. 05-07-00440-CV, 2007 WL 1168446 at *1 (Tex. App.–Dallas Apr. 20, 2007, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). Accordingly, we DISMISS relator’s petition for writ of mand amus for want of jurisdiction.

140002F.P05 /David Bridges/ DAVID BRIDGES JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEPTEMBER
30, 1999 10Q FELCOR LODGING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 10Q OF FELCOR LODGING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          48,027
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,650
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,677
<PP&E>                                       4,335,853
<DEPRECIATION>                                 290,495
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,271,086
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          130,397
<BONDS>                                      1,707,981
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    295,000
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,086,319
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,271,086
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               386,186
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              90,692
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                112,636
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            112,636
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,113
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   111,523
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.30


</TABLE>
<PAGE>




                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

       COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF INCOME TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK
                             DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    SIX MONTHS ENDED          THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                           --------------------------------------------------------
                                                       JUNE 30,                     JUNE 30,
                                                  2002         2001            2002          2001
                                           --------------------------------------------------------
<C>                                           <C>           <C>             <C>          <C>
Net income                                    $ 1,485,553   $ 1,440,060     $ 813,328    $ 700,999
Fixed charges:
Income before fixed charges                   $ 1,485,553   $ 1,440,060     $ 813,328    $ 700,999
Fixed charges, as above
Preferred stock dividend requirements         $   900,450   $   900,450     $ 450,225    $ 450,225
Fixed charges including preferred
   stock dividends                            $   900,450   $   900,450     $ 450,225    $ 450,225
Ratio of income to fixed charges and
   preferred stock dividend requirements             1.65          1.60          1.81         1.56
</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I,
Scott M. Colosi, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Texas Roadhouse, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: February 26, 2010

By:

/s/ SCOTT M. COLOSI Scott M. Colosi Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
#### ISADORE MANDEL, RESPONDENT, v. FEDERAL SHIPBUILDING & DRYDOCK COMPANY, APPELLANT.

Submitted May 25, 1945

Decided October 15, 1945.

For the appellant, *Stryker, Tams £ Horner, William L. Dill, Jr.,*and *Thomas Moloney.*

For the respondent, *Laurence Semel.*

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bodine, J.

Isadora Mandel was an employee of the Federal Shipbuilding & Drydock Company. He complained of a right inguinal hernia. He was awarded compensation in the Bureau, which award was reversed on appeal by the Essex County Court of Common Pleas and reinstated by the Supreme Court.

It appears that the workman suffered the injury on June 26th, 1943, in lifting a blower while in the appellant’s employ.

*R. S.*34:15-12 (x) provides when compensation for such an injury may be recovered. Compensation is allowed only in the following instances: (1) if it resulted from the application of force directly to the abdominal wall or (2) if it resulted under such circumstances that by sudden effort or severe strain five conditions were met. The proofs did not qualify the workman for compensation; he did not comply with *R. S.*34:15-12 (x).

The Supreme Court based its opinion upon the theory that the workman suffered an aggravation of a pre-existing hernia condition and, therefore, the case was controlled by *Furferi**312v. *Pennsylvania*Railroad, 117 *N. J. L.*508. We clo not so read the proofs.

The only testimony to support the conclusion of the Supreme Court was given by Dr. Max Kummel. The doctor, cross-examined as to the previous operation, admitted that the previous condition had been cured and thpt therefore there was no aggravation of a previously existing hernia. His testimony did not support the finding of the Supreme Court. We must, therefore, reverse. For authority for so doing see cases collected in *Everson*v. *Board of Education,*133 *N. J. L.*350.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is reversed.

*For affirmance*— The Chancellor, Colie, Wells, Raeeerty, JJ. 4.

*For reversal*— Parker, Case, Bodine, Heher, Oliphant, Freund, McGeehan, JJ. 7.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with Quarterly Report of Kid Castle
Educational Corporation, a Florida Corporation (the “Registrant”), on Form 10-Q
for the fiscal period ending June 30, 2009 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, each of the undersigned hereby certify that:





1. To the
best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. To the
best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Registrant.




DATE:
      August 13, 2009
                  BY:
                  /s/
      Min-Tan YangMIN
      TAN YANGCHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER




DATE:
      August 13, 2009
                BY:
                /s/
      Suang-Yi PaiSUANG-YI
      PAICHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER