alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of United PanAm Financial Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Arash Khazei, certify in my capacity as Chief Financial Officer and Executive
      Vice President of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(a)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




(b)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto signed this Certification as
      of
      November 10, 2008.




/s/    ARASHKHAZEI**Arash
                Khazei****Chief
                Financial Officer and Executive Vice
                President**
#### BAE SYSTEMS ELECTRONICS LIMITED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROCKWELL COLLINS, INC. and Elcan Optical Technologies (an unincorporated division of Raytheon Company), Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-1601.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 19, 2004.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the parties’ joint motion to dismiss this appeal with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 42(b),

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted.*

(2) Each party shall bear its own costs.

*

 We note that the parties request that this dismissal be with prejudice, however, it is not the practice of this court to dismiss with or without prejudice.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 5, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129037 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 129037 

 COA: 259503 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

Wayne CC: 01-001259-FH 

v 

JOSHUA SIMS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 11, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1128 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 5, 2005 

Clerk
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Garrett Shea","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/garrett-shea-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Systems Engineering Handbook","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BO1LZ8HPiH\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/reference\/systems-engineering-handbook\/\">Systems Engineering Handbook<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/reference\/systems-engineering-handbook\/embed\/#?secret=BO1LZ8HPiH\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Systems Engineering Handbook” — NASA\" data-secret=\"BO1LZ8HPiH\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT FOF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Tower Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Michael H. Lee,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Francis M. Colalucci,Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §****906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) ofthe Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.
| /s/ MICHAEL H. LEE                                            |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael H. Lee                                                |   |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer                        |   |
| March 15,  2006                                          |   |
| /s/ FRANCIS M. COLALUCCI                                      |   |
| Francis M.  Colalucci                                         |   |
| Senior Vice  President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| March 15,  2006                                          |   |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 134 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 30, 1997.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 867) to promote the adoption of children in foster care. The first 
reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. Points of order against 
consideration of the bill for failure to comply with clause 2(l)(6) of rule XI 
or section 303(a) or 308(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 are waived. 
General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Ways and Means. After general debate the bill shall be 
considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to 
consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute 
rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 
Ways and Means now printed in the bill, modified as specified in the report of 
the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each section of the 
committee amendment in the nature of a substitute, as modified, shall be 
considered as read. Points of order against the committee amendment in the 
nature of a substitute, as modified, for failure to comply with clause 7 of rule 
XVI or section 303(a) or 306 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 are waived. 
During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of 
the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member 
offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of the 
Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII. 
Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 
bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may 
demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of 
the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a 
substitute, as modified. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion 
except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

      ( print page 68245)    
                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo,*                     or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                 

Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. 

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than December 10, 2014. 

                    A.                     *Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond*                     (Adam M. Drimer, Assistant Vice President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:                 

                    1.                     *H Bancorp LLC,*                     Columbia, Maryland, to acquire additional voting shares of Bay Bancorp, Inc., Columbia, Maryland, and thereby indirectly acquire additional shares of Bay Bank, FSB, Lutherville, Maryland, and thereby engage in operating a savings association, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(4)(ii).                 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 7, 2014. 

Michael J. Lewandowski, 

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2014-26881 Filed 11-13-14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Exhibit A

Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 61-1 Filed: 06/21/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:421
1

McGuire Law, P.C.

55 West Wacker Drive, 9th Floor 

Chicago, Illinois 60601

(312) 893-7002

June 9, 2021

Via Electronic Mail

Melissa A. Siebert (masiebert@shb.com)

Amy Cho (acho@shb.com)

SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.

111 South Wacker Drive, Suite 4700

Chicago, IL 60606

Tel: (312) 704-7700

Fax: (312) 558-1195

Re: Fleury v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, No. 20-cv-00390 (N.D. Ill.)

Dear Melissa:

This letter serves to remind Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (“Defendant”) of 

its failure to respond to Plaintiff’s First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production of 

Documents (herein “Discovery Requests”). Plaintiff served his Discovery Requests on April 5, 

2021, and on April 9, the Court entered and continued the service of Plaintiff’s Discovery Requests 

to the date of the Parties’ then-forthcoming Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures. (Dkt. 52.)

At the Court’s direction, the Parties exchanged their Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures on May 6, 

2021. (Dkts. 56-57.) It has been 34 days since such disclosures were exchanged and Defendant’s 

responses to Plaintiff’s Discovery Requests are now several days overdue. Defendant has not 

sought or been granted an extension of this deadline, or provided any reasoning as to its failure to 

respond to Plaintiff’s Discovery Requests.

Notably, Judge Alonso’s Case Procedures regarding discovery state that the pendency of a 

motion does not operate as a stay of discovery. Accordingly, Defendant’s pending Motion to Stay 

does not exempt Defendant from responding to Plaintiff’s Discovery Requests. Because these Case 

Procedures also discourage the Parties from filing discovery motions, Plaintiff would like to 

resolve the issue without seeking intervention from the Court. Please advise us of your availability 

for a meet-and-confer regarding Defendant’s failure to respond to Plaintiff’s Discovery Requests.

Sincerely,

Brendan Duffner

cc: Myles McGuire (via email)

cc: David L. Gerbie (via email)

cc: Steven Beckham (via email)

Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 61-1 Filed: 06/21/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:422
Case: 1:20-cr-00267 Document #: 5 Filed: 06/24/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:17
Case: 1:20-cr-00267 Document #: 5 Filed: 06/24/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:18
#### Kenneth FUGATE, Claimant-Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-7021.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: Oct. 26, 2004.

ORDER

Pursuant to the Court’s letter dated September 27, 2004,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

This appeal is dismissed.
9713.

#### Robinson *v.*The State.

Decided October 8, 1918.

Accusation of violation of prohibition law.; from city court of Macon—Judge Guerry. March 21, 1918.

■ *W. A. McClellan) J. F. Urquhari,*for plaintiff in error.

*Will Gunn, solicitor,*contra.

Broyles, P. J.

There was some evidence to authorize the finding of th'e trial judge, exercising by consent the functions of both judge and jury;. and the motion for a new trial containing only the usual general grounds, this court will not interfere with'the discretion of the lower court in overruling the motion.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur. ■*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4188-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2014-0003]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for State of Washington (FEMA-4188-DR), dated August 11, 2014, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         October 17, 2014.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Thomas J. Dargan, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Michael J. Hall as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2014-25985 Filed 10-31-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### Samuel C. Sayers *v.*Elisha W. Coleman, etc.

Husband and Wife — Conveyance by Wife to Husband or to Themselves is Void — Two Parties are Necessary to a Deed.

A wife cannot convey to her husband, because she cannot, on account of her disability of coverture, make a deed unless her husband .joins her in its execution. She and her husband cannot, in conjunction, mate a deed to the latter, nor to themselves, because two parties are necessary to every deed and the same person cannot occupy the attitude of grantor and grantee, donor and donee.

APPEAL PROM KENTON CHANCERY COURT.

September 12, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

Appellant, who was the husband of Mrs. Harriett Sayers, deceased, claims a life estate in 136 acres of land in Kenton county, and two lots near the city of Covington which Mrs. Sayers held in fee under a deed bearing date 6th of December, 1868, by which he and his wife attempts to convey a life estate in said lands to themselves and to the survivor of them, remainder to the brothers and sisters of Mrs. Sayers of the whole blood.

Mrs. Sayers having died this suit was brought by a portion of her heirs against the others for partition or sale of the real estate left by her, and appellant being in possession was made defendant. He filed an answer and claimed under said.deed, and a demurrer having been sustained to his answer, he has appealed to this court.

It is a well settled principle that a wife cannot convey to her husband, because she cannot on account of her disability of coverture make a deed unless her husband join her in its execution. She and her husband cannot in conjunction make a deed to the latter, nor to themselves, because two parties are necessary to every deed. And the same persons *cannot occupy*the attitude of bargainor and bargainee, donor and donee.

Second. It is a maxim of the common law that the husband and wife cannot make a valid contract with each other during the coverture, the true reason for which is that the wife is regarded as under the coercion of the husband, whereby she is deprived of the freedom of volition, and should not be bound by her con*734tracts with him. *Scarborough v. Watkins and Wife, 9*B. Mon. 540.

J. *M. Collins, Carlisle, for appellant.*

*Stevenson, Myers, for appellant.*

The demurrer was therefore properly sustained to Sayers’ answer, and as the other defendants in the court below do not complain of the judgment of that court, the same is affirmed on the appeal of S. C. Sayers.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-38","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"J8tOffaVy0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-38\/\">STS-38<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-38\/embed\/#?secret=J8tOffaVy0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-38” — NASA\" data-secret=\"J8tOffaVy0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/9015177\/9015177~large.jpg?w=600&h=1530&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1530}