alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 16, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-2217 Lower Tribunal No. F17-9386

________________ 

### Jeffrey Lagrandeur, Appellant,
vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marisa Tinkler Mendez, Judge. Jeffrey Lagrandeur, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Michael W. Mervine, Bureau Chief, and Brian H. Zack, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and EMAS and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. Anderson v. State, 627 So. 2d 1170, 1171 (Fla. 1993) (“To support summary denial without a hearing, a trial court must either state its rationale in its decision or attach those specific parts of the record that refute each claim presented in the motion.”); Sanders v. State, 946 So. 2d 953, 956 (Fla. 2006) (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984) ("First, the defendant must show that counsel's performance was deficient. . . . Second, the defendant must show that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense.").
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

NITETEK LICENSING LLC,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

HMS INDUSTRIAL NETWORKS INC.,

 Defendant.

Civil Action No.: 1:20-cv-03193

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Plaintiff Nitetek Licensing LLC, (“Plaintiff”), by and through its undersigned attorney, 

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), hereby voluntarily dismisses all claims in this action 

without prejudice against Defendant HMS Industrial Networks, Inc. (“Defendant”). Prior to the 

filing of this notice, Defendant has not filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment.

Dated: August 25, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

ANDREOU & CASSON, LTD.

/s/_Luke A. Casson__________

Luke A. Casson

Andreou & Casson, Ltd.

661 West Lake St., Suite 2N

Chicago, Illinois 60661

P: 312.935.2000

F: 312.935.2001

Email: lcasson@andeou-casson.com

Case: 1:20-cv-03193 Document #: 7 Filed: 08/25/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:150
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this day a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was 

filed electronically. As such, this document was served on all counsel who are deemed to have 

consented to electronic service. 

.

/s/_Luke A. Casson__________

Luke A. Casson

Case: 1:20-cv-03193 Document #: 7 Filed: 08/25/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:151
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 331

Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 13, 1997

Mr. ARMEY submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating majority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Member be, and

2 he is hereby, elected to the following standing committee

3 of the House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVER5 SIGHT: Mr. Miller of Florida.
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

I, Martin C.
Stammer, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Stereotaxis, Inc.;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |  |  |                              
|----------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|Date: May 2, 2014 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Martin C. Stammer        
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | Martin C. Stammer            
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | Stereotaxis, Inc.            
|                  |  |  |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-20709

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARGARITO PERALTA-MORALES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-01-CR-45-1

--------------------

January 23, 2002

Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Margarito

Peralta-Morales on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw as

counsel and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Peralta-Morales has filed a

response to counsel's motion and brief, arguing that his attorney

did not speak Spanish and that he entered the United States in

search of medical care for injuries allegedly inflicted in a

beating by a sheriff.
No. 01-20709

-2-

Our independent review of the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for 

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2. 

DISMISSED. MOTION GRANTED.
#### ANGELA FIDUCIA, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. MORRIS MAGENHEIM ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Submitted October 26, 1945

Decided January 3, 1946.

For the respondents, *Cox cé Walburg.*

For the defendants, *Edward R. McGlynn (Kellogg & Chance,*of counsel).

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*— Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Colie, Oliphant, Wells, Raeeerty, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, JJ. 12.

*For reversal*— None.
Case: 1:20-cv-00458 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/21/20 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:7
Case: 1:20-cv-00458 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/21/20 Page 2 of 12 PageID #:8
Case: 1:20-cv-00458 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/21/20 Page 3 of 12 PageID #:9
Case: 1:20-cv-00458 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/21/20 Page 4 of 12 PageID #:10
Case: 1:20-cv-00458 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/21/20 Page 5 of 12 PageID #:11
Case: 1:20-cv-00458 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/21/20 Page 6 of 12 PageID #:12
Case: 1:20-cv-00458 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/21/20 Page 7 of 12 PageID #:13
Case: 1:20-cv-00458 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/21/20 Page 8 of 12 PageID #:14
Case: 1:20-cv-00458 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/21/20 Page 9 of 12 PageID #:15
Case: 1:20-cv-00458 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/21/20 Page 10 of 12 PageID #:16
Case: 1:20-cv-00458 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/21/20 Page 11 of 12 PageID #:17
Case: 1:20-cv-00458 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/21/20 Page 12 of 12 PageID #:18
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 28, 2009 

p1021 

Order 

 

October 28, 2009 

139275 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139275 

 COA: 290001 

Calhoun CC: 2008-000120-FH 

JAMES EDWARD KENDALL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 16, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Filed 5/17/ 22 P. v. Arias CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

JUAN JOSE ARIAS,

Defendant and Appellant. 2d Crim. No. B 316706

(Super. Ct. No s . 2020020130,

2020032243 )

(Ventura County)

Juan Jose Arias ple a d ed guilty in two cases being

appeale d: resisting an officer by force (Pen. Code

, 1 § 69, subd. (a))

and trespass b y threat (§ 601, subd. (a)). He also admitted he

was out on bail when he committed both offenses. (§ 12022.1,

subd. (b).)

In a third case, which for some reason is not part of

this appeal, Arias ple a d ed guilty to trespass by threat and

evading an office r ( Veh. Code

, § 2800.2, subd. (a)) and admitted to

1 All statutory references are to the Penal Code unless

otherwise stated/2

being out on bail. The parties agreed to a total sentence of 11

years for all three cases. The trial court sentenced Arias to 11

years as follows: the upper term of three years for one count of

trespass by threat, consecutive middle terms of eight months for

each of the three remaining offenses

, and consecutive terms of

two years each on three enhancements for committing the

offenses while out on bail.

Arias entered the residence of the mother of his

ch ildren in violation of a stay away order and fought with officers

who tried to arrest him. He appeals his sentence.

We appointed counsel to represent Arias in this

appeal. After examining the record, he filed a brief raising no

issues.

On March 29, 202 2, we advised Arias by mail that he

had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or

issues that he wished to raise on appeal. We received no reply.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied

that Arias’s attorney has fully com plied with his responsibilities

and that no arguable issue exists. ( People v. Wende (1979) 25

Cal.3d. 436, 441.)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

.

GILBERT, P. J.

We concur:

YEGAN, J.

PERREN, J.3 Rocky J. Baio, Judge

Superior Cour t County of Ventura

______________________________

Richard B. Lennon, under appointment by the Court

of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
IV

House Calendar No. 63

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 187

[Report No. 105–187]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1853) to amend the Carl D.

Perkins Vocational and Applied Technology Education Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 16, 1997

Mr. MCINNIS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1853) to amend

the Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Applied Technology

Education Act.

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of

3 rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 1853) to amend the Carl D. Perkins

6 Vocational and Applied Technology Education Act. The

7 first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. Points of
2

HRES 187 RH

1 order against consideration of the bill for failure to comply

2 with clause 2(l)(6) of rule XI are waived. General debate

3 shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour

4 equally divided and controlled by the chairman and rank5 ing minority member of the Committee on Education and

6 the Workforce. After general debate the bill shall be con7 sidered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall

8 be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose

9 of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment

10 in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Commit11 tee on Education and the Workforce now printed in the

12 bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a sub13 stitute shall be considered as read. During consideration

14 of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee

15 of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the

16 basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has

17 caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional

18 Record designated for that purpose in clause 6 of rule

19 XXIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as

20 read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for

21 amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill

22 to the House with such amendments as may have been

23 adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the

24 House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of

25 the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in
3

HRES 187 RH

1 the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be

2 considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto

3 to final passage without intervening motion except on

4 emotion to recommit with or without instructions.
House Calendar No. 63

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 187

[Report No. 105–187]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1853)

Applied Technology Education Act.to amend the Carl D. Perkins Vocational and

JULY 16, 1997

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 438

Expressing the sense of the House regarding the transfer to the People’s

Republic of China of technology that can be used in the development

of strategic nuclear missiles.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 14, 1998

Mr. RYUN (for himself, Mr. BLILEY, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr.

HOSTETTLER, Mr. KING, Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina, Mr. PETERSON

of Pennsylvania, Mr. STARK, Mr. PAPPAS, Mr. HILLEARY, Mrs. CUBIN,

Mrs. FOWLER, Mr. STUMP, Mr. SAXTON, Mr. TIAHRT, Mr. DICKEY, Mr.

SNOWBARGER, Mr. WAMP, and Ms. DANNER) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House regarding the transfer

to the People’s Republic of China of technology that

can be used in the development of strategic nuclear missiles.

Whereas missile guidance technology has already been transferred to a Chinese company that is involved in the production of strategic nuclear missiles;

Whereas the People’s Republic of China has refused to join

the 29-nation Missile Technology Control Regime;

Whereas it cannot be certified that the People’s Republic of

China is not transferring missile technology to Iran,
2

•HRES 438 IH

Pakistan, or other nations that have not joined the Missile Technology Control Regime; and

Whereas the People’s Republic of China has threatened to

use strategic nuclear missiles against the United States:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the President and the Congress should

3 act to ensure that no technology that can be used to de4 velop strategic nuclear missiles is transferred to the Peo5 ple’s Republic of China unless—

6 (1) the People’s Republic of China joins the

7 Missile Technology Control Regime;

8 (2) the People’s Republic of China guarantees

9 that it does not and will not transfer strategic nu10 clear or other missile technology to Iran, Pakistan,

11 or other nations that have not joined the Missile

12 Technology Control Regime; and

13 (3) the President certifies to the Congress that

14 no such transfer is occurring or is likely to occur.

Æ
EXHIBIT 23.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTRED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed Registration Statements Nos. 333-139703,  333-140787, and 333-171397 on Form S-8 of St. Bernard Software, Inc. (the “Company”) of our report dated March 18, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 18, 2011.








/s/ Squar, Milner, Peterson, Miranda & Williamson, LLP





San Diego, California


March 18, 2011
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: JaJuan Nile v. Ronald Watts, et 

al. 

Case Number: 20 CV 2922 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for: 

City of Chicago, Philip Cline, Debra Kirby and Karen Rowan 

Attorney name (type or print): Paul A. Michalik 

Firm: Reiter Burns LLP 

Street address: 311 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 5200 

City/State/Zip: Chicago, IL 60606 

Bar ID Number: 6198674 

(See item 3 in instructions) 

Telephone Number: 312 982-0090 

 

Email Address: pmichalik@reiterburns.com 

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case? Yes No 

Are you acting as local counsel in this case? Yes No 

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar? Yes No 

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? Yes No 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel 

 Appointed Counsel 

 If appointed counsel, are you a 

 

 Federal Defender 

 CJA Panel Attorney 

______________________________________________________________________ 

In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this Court’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 U.S.C.§1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath. 

Executed on June 26, 2020 

Attorney signature: S/ Paul A. Michalik 

 (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.) 

 Revised 8/1/2015 

Case: 1:20-cv-02922 Document #: 19 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:64
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 10


                               MATERIAL CONTRACTS


The following  material  contracts of Navistar  Financial 2003-B Owner Trust are
incorporated herein by reference:

10.1     Purchase  Agreement  dated as of October  31,  2003,  between  Navistar
         Financial   Corporation  and  Navistar   Financial  Retail  Receivables
         Corporation,  as Purchaser,  with respect to Navistar  Financial 2003-B
         Owner Trust,  as Issuer.  Filed as Exhibit  99.1 to Navistar  Financial
         Retail Receivables Corporation's Form 8-K dated November 5, 2003. Filed
         on Registration No. 333-67112.

10.2     Pooling  Agreement  dated  as  of  October  31,  2003,  among  Navistar
         Financial  Corporation,  as  Servicer,  and Navistar  Financial  Retail
         Receivables Corporation, as Seller, and Navistar Financial 2003-B Owner
         Trust,  as Issuer.  Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Navistar  Financial  Retail
         Receivables  Corporation's  Form 8-K dated  November 5, 2003.  Filed on
         Registration No. 333-67112.

10.3     Servicing  Agreement  dated as of  October  31,  2003,  among  Navistar
         Financial  Corporation,  as  Servicer,  and Navistar  Financial  Retail
         Receivables Corporation, as Seller, and Navistar Financial 2003-B Owner
         Trust, as Issuer.  Filed as Exhibit 99.3 to Navistar  Financial  Retail
         Receivables  Corporation's  Form 8-K dated  November 5, 2003.  Filed on
         Registration No. 333-67112.

10.4     Trust  Agreement  dated  as  of  October  31,  2003,  between  Navistar
         Financial  Retail  Receivables   Corporation,   as  Seller,  and  Chase
         Manhattan  Bank Delaware,  as Owner  Trustee,  with respect to Navistar
         Financial  2003-B  Owner  Trust.  Filed  as  Exhibit  4.3  to  Navistar
         Financial Retail  Receivables  Corporation's Form 8-K dated November 5,
         2003. Filed on Registration No. 333-67112.

10.5     Indenture  dated as of October 31,  2003,  between  Navistar  Financial
         2003-B Owner Trust and The Bank of New York, as Indenture Trustee, with
         respect to Navistar  Financial 2003-B Owner Trust. Filed as Exhibit 4.2
         to Navistar Financial Retail  Receivables  Corporation's Form 8-K dated
         November 5, 2003. Filed on Registration No. 333-67112.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Anthony Mays v. Ronald Watts, 

et al. 

Case Number: 20 CV 3228 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for: 

City of Chicago, Philip Cline, Debra Kirby, Karen Rowan 

Attorney name (type or print): Daniel J. Burns 

Firm: Reiter Burns LLP 

Street address: 311 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 5200 

City/State/Zip: Chicago, IL 60606 

Bar ID Number: 6320384 

(See item 3 in instructions) 

Telephone Number: 312 982-0090 

 

Email Address: dburns@reiterburns.com 

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case? Yes No 

Are you acting as local counsel in this case? Yes No 

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar? Yes No 

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? Yes No 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel 

 Appointed Counsel 

 If appointed counsel, are you a 

 

 Federal Defender 

 CJA Panel Attorney 

______________________________________________________________________ 

In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this Court’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 U.S.C.§1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath. 

Executed on July 29, 2020 

Attorney signature: S/ Daniel J. Burns 

 (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.) 

 Revised 8/1/2015 

Case: 1:20-cv-03228 Document #: 19 Filed: 07/29/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:63