alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Jacquelyen Derry

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02951

Honorable Young B. Kim

Andrew Saul

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, February 16, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: The government's

unopposed motion for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's brief [17] is granted.

The government now has until March 18, 2021, to file its response. Plaintiff now has until

April 1, 2021, to file a reply, but one is not required. Mailed notice (ma,)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02951 Document #: 18 Filed: 02/16/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:3911
#### White *v.*Lloyd and Another, on Appeal.

REPLEVIN. Plea, property in one of the defendants. Verdict as follows: — “We the jury find for the defendants, and that they have a return of their, property in their plea mentioned.” Judgment in favour of the defendants for a return of the property, and for costs. The plaintiff appeals.

*Held,*that, in replevin, if the defendant claim property and obtain a verdict, as in the present case, he is entitled to a return of the goods, but not to damages; that the defendant in replevin was in no case entitled to damages by the common law; and that the statutes of 7 *Hen.*8. and 21 *Hen.*8. giving the defendant in replevin damages in certain cases, do not apply to a case where the defendant pleads property in the goods. *Hopewell*v. Price, 2 Harr. & Gill, 275.

*Held,*also, that though a defendant in replevin claiming property, is not entitled to costs by the common law, nor by the *English*statutes on the subject; yet, by the statute law of this state, he is entitled to costs when he obtains a verdict in such a case in replevin, as in all other cases. *Hiday et al.*v. *Gilmore,*in this Court, *May*term, 1832 (1).

(1)

 Ante, p. 48.

The judgment was affirmed with costs.
Case: 1:20-cv-03416 Document #: 10-2 Filed: 06/12/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:67
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.6.3

Eastern Division

Rock Capital Markets, LLC, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03638

Honorable Joan B. Gottschall

Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, November 22, 2022:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: The parties jointly report

[74] that they reached an agreement concerning the scope of jurisdictional discovery at

their meet and confer session held 11/21/2022. Counsel's efforts to resolve their dispute

without resorting to motion practice are appreciated. As the parties propose, the next

status report is due on or before 1/5/2023. Mailed notice(mjc, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03638 Document #: 75 Filed: 11/22/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:599
#### DEATON v. TITUSVILLE BLDG. CORPORATION et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

June 20, 1947.

Benenson, Herwitz & Israelson, and Goldwater & Flynn, all of New York City (James L. Goldwater and Arnold G. Mal-kan, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Sullivan & Cromwell, of New York City (Inzer B. Wyatt, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

COXE, District Judge.

This is a typical action by maintenance employees for overtime compensation, liquidated damages and attorneys’ fees under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.

The action was commenced on December 27, 1946, by service of a summons and complaint, and the time of the defendant American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corporation to answer has been extended from time to time by stipulation.

The defendant American Radiator *&*Standard Sanitary Corporation makes no contention that the complaint is insufficient under the Fair Labor Standards Act as it existed prior to the enactment of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 on May 14, 1947, 29 U.S.C.A. § 251 et seq., but it insists that the complaint is now defective because it does not allege facts sufficient *987to bring it within the provisions of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947. Under the circumstances above described, I think that the present complaint may be deemed sufficient as a pleading, leaving it to the defendant American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corporation to set up in its answer, by way of defense, any pertinent facts with respect to the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947.

With respect to the other relief requested, the order may provide that any claimants not already listed in the complaint may apply to intervene on or before October 1, 1947, and that all claimants file written consents to become parties with the Clerk of the Court on or before October 1, 1947.

The motion of the defendant American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corporation to dismiss the complaint is denied, and the motion for other relief is also denied except to the extent above indicated.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Michael Apelt, 

Petitioner, 

v.

Charles L. Ryan, et al.,

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-98-882-PHX-ROS

DEATH PENALTY CASE

ORDER

 

Before the Court is Petitioner’s motion to file ex parte and under seal his lodged

Motion to Supplement Budget. The lodged motion contains information protected by the

attorney work-product doctrine. Consequently, the Court finds the need for confidentiality

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3599(f) and will permit the lodged motion to be filed ex parte and

under seal.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Seal (Doc. 305) is

GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall file Petitioner’s lodged Motion to Supplement Budget

(Doc. 306) ex parte and under seal.

DATED this 6th day of January, 2012.

Case 2:98-cv-00882-ROS Document 307 Filed 01/06/12 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 319 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 135
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 319

                          [Report No. 105-400]

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 738) to reform the statutes 
  relating to Amtrak, to authorize appropriations for Amtrak, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 9, 1997

 Mr. Diaz-Balart, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 738) to reform the statutes 
  relating to Amtrak, to authorize appropriations for Amtrak, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (S. 738) to reform the statutes relating to Amtrak, to 
authorize appropriations for Amtrak, and for other purposes. The bill 
shall be considered as read for amendment. The amendment printed in the 
report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be 
considered as adopted. All points of order against the bill, as 
amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening 
motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, which 
shall be equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure; 
and (2) one motion to commit with or without instructions.
                                     

                                                 House Calendar No. 135

105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 319

                          [Report No. 105-400]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 738) to reform the statutes 
  relating to Amtrak, to authorize appropriations for Amtrak, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 9, 1997

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

HARDY LEE BROWNER

Case No. 20 CR 299

Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr.

NOTICE OF MOTION

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Friday, August 14, 2020 at 9:30 a.m., or as 

soon thereafter as counsel may be heard, I will appear before the Honorable Robert 

M. Dow, Jr. in the courtroom usually occupied by him in the United States 

Courthouse, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604, or before such other

judge who may be sitting in his place and stead, and then and there present the 

Government’s Motion for Pretrial Conference Pursuant to the Classified 

Information Procedures Act, the Government’s Unopposed Motion for 

Protective Order Pursuant to Section 3 of the Classified Information 

Procedures Act, and the Agreed Motion to Designate a Classified 

Information Security Officer in the above-captioned case, at which time and place 

you may appear if you see fit.

Respectfully submitted,

JOHN R. LAUSCH, JR.

United States Attorney

By: /s/ Barry Jonas

BARRY JONAS

JORDAN MATTHEWS

Assistant United States Attorneys

219 South Dearborn, Fifth Floor

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Dated: July 13, 2020 (312) 353-5300

Case: 1:20-cr-00299 Document #: 26 Filed: 07/13/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:100
EXHIBIT

A

Case: 1:20-cv-03487 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 06/15/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:15
Case: 1:20-cv-03487 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 06/15/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:16
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Sally Ride EarthKAM Mission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"S174MgWDiM\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/sally-ride-earthkam-mission\/\">Sally Ride EarthKAM Mission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/sally-ride-earthkam-mission\/embed\/#?secret=S174MgWDiM\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Sally Ride EarthKAM Mission” — NASA\" data-secret=\"S174MgWDiM\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/iss042e013697\/iss042e013697~large.jpg?w=600&h=1277&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1277}
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 215 (Thursday, November 6, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65934-65935]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26389]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. TS13-4-000]

Hudson Transmission Partners, LLC; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on October 29, 2014, Hudson Transmission Partners, 
LLC filed a supplement to its July 12, 2013 request for exemption from, 
or waiver of, the standards of conduct set forth in Part 358 of the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) regulations, 18 CFR 
358.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC.

[[Page 65935]]

There is an ``eSubscription'' link on the Web site that enables 
subscribers to receive email notification when a document is added to a 
subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, 
please email [email protected], or call (866) 208-3676 (toll 
free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on November 19, 2014.

    Dated: October 30, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-26389 Filed 11-5-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as principal executive officer of Xerium Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify that, to his knowledge: 

1) the Company’s Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

2) the information contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/ Thomas Gutierrez

Thomas Gutierrez 

President and Chief Executive Officer 

(Principal Executive Officer) 

Dated: March 1, 2006
#### John Seber *v.*R. W. Nelson.

Trespass — Action Against Constable for Damages for Sale of Property Under Execution May be Pleaded in Bar of an Action for Recovery of Specific Property.

The constable had sold the property under execution and appellant elected to sue in trespass for the value of the property in which he obtained judgment against the constable, He cannot now maintain this action against appellee who obtained possession by his purchase under the execution.

*102APPEAL FROM CAMPBELL CIRCUIT COURT.

January 16, 1872.

*Hawkins, Baker, for appellant.*

*Hallam, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Pryor :

The action of trespass instituted by the present appellant against John Á. Nelson, the constable, in which he seeks not only to recover damages for the alleged trespass but also the value of the horse and two mules sold 'by him under the execution against Jacob Steiger, was properly pleaded as a bar to the present action of the appellant against the appellee for the recovery for the same property. The verdict of the jury for the appellant in the suit against the constable was for sixty dollars, the value of the brown mule, and the title to the horse and the other mule being- put directly in issue in that suit, and the appellant failing to recover was in effect determining that this horse and mule was subject to the execution against Steiger. The constable had sold this property under the execution and the appellant elected to sue in trespass for the value of the property.' He obtained the judgment against the constable and cannot now maintain this action for the recovery for the specific property as against the appellee, who obtained possession of it by his purchase under the execution. The judgment is affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

BROOKE BOONE, )

Plaintiff, )

v. ) No. 1:20-cv-2863

)

HOSPIRA INC. and HOSPIRA, )

WORLDWIDE, LLC, f/k/a HOSPIRA )

WORLDWIDE, INC. )

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF FILING

To: Sara B. Roitman, (Sara.Roitman@dechert.com), Dechert LLP, 35 W Wacker Dr 

Ste 3400, Chicago IL 60601 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on May 19, 2020, there was filed with the Clerk of 

the U.S. District for the Northern District of Illinois, the Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, a 

copy of which is attached.

Respectfully submitted,

MORRISON & MORRISON, P.C.

By: /s/ Donald J. Morrison

Attorney for Plaintiff

Donald J. Morrison (6225680)

don@morrisonandmorrison.com

Morrison & Morrison, P.C.

32 N. West Street

Waukegan, Illinois 60085

Phone: 847-244-2660

Fax: 847-244-6817

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies, under penalties as provided by law pursuant to 735 

ILCS 5/1-109 of the Code of Civil Procedure, that this document was served by email on 

May 19, 2020.

/s/ Donald J. Morrison

Case: 1:20-cv-02863 Document #: 13 Filed: 05/19/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:95
#### In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings: Doctors Service Corps, Inc., Judgment Creditor, Respondent, *v.*Evelyn Robbins, Judgment Debtor. Evelyn Goldstein, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

February 5, 1926.

Execution — supplementary proceedings — failure to serve defendant with summons vitiates all proceedings subsequent to judgment — examination of third party vacated.

An examination of a third party in proceedings supplementary to execution cannot be had where the defendant therein was never served with a summons, since all proceedings subsequent to the judgment were void.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the City Court of the City of New York, denying a motion to vacate two orders for the examination of a third person.

*Harry Levin,*for the appellant.

*Morris P. Schaffer,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam.

The defendant was never served with a summons in this action. All the proceedings subsequent to the judgment and based thereon were, therefore, void. Order appealed from *588reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to vacate the two orders for the examination of the United National Bank as a third party in proceedings supplementary to execution is granted, with ten dollars costs.

All concur; present, Bijur, Delehanty and Wagner, JJ.
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 595

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United

Courthouse’’.Bootle Federal Building and United Statesin Macon, Georgia, as the ‘‘William AugustusStates courthouse located at 475 Mulberry Street
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 595

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 475 Mulberry Street in Macon, Georgia,

as the ‘‘William Augustus Bootle Federal Building and

United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 595 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building and United States courthouse

3 located at 475 Mulberry Street in Macon, Georgia, shall

4 be known and designated as the ‘‘William Augustus Bootle

5 Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

9 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec10 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘William

11 Augustus Bootle Federal Building and United States

12 Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 13,

1997.

Attest:

Clerk.