alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1396

ROGER A. LYNCH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (CA-02-3187-HFF) Submitted: February 13, 2006 Decided: March 6, 2006 Before WILKINS, Chief Judge, and MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Karen Creech, COVINGTON, PATRICK, HAGINS, STERN & LEWIS, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. Theodore D. Willard, Jr., MONTGOMERY, PATTERSON, POTTS & WILLARD, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Roger A. Lynch appeals from the district court’s award of summary judgment to defendant Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company (“Provident”) in this lawsuit concerning Provident’s denialof Lynch’s claim for long-term disability benefits under an ERISAgoverned benefits plan. Upon careful consideration of the record and the parties’ briefs, we are unable to identify any reversible error. We are ther efore content to dispose of this appeal by adopting the district court’s opinion adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendations. SeeLynch v. Provident Life and Accident Ins. Co. , CA-02-3187-HFF (D.S.C. May 13, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
H. Res. 336

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 27, 1998.

Resolved, That the Clerk of the House inform the Senate

that a quorum of the House is present and that the House

is ready to proceed with business.

Attest:

Clerk.
George W. Quinn

gw@nist.gov

March 8th, 2012

IREX IV

Large Scale Evaluation of Iris

Identification Systems
The Iris Exchange (IREX) Program

Purpose:

 IREX was initiated to support an expanded marketplace of iris-based 

applications based on standardized interoperable iris imagery.

Prior Activities

 IREX I: Investigated standard image formats for the exchange of iris 

data.

 IREX II - IQCE: Evaluated the accuracy of automated quality 

assessment algorithms.

 IREX III: Large-scale Evaluation of iris identification algorithms.
Purpose:

 Large scale identification test (like IREX III).

Differences from IREX III:

 New dataset with uncompressed iris samples.

 We plan to investigate optimal JPEG 2000 Compression 

Parameters.

 Participants will be requested to submit algorithms that attempt 

to minimize a cost function.

IREX IV
Cost Model 

In an identification mode, DET curves show the trade-off between 

two types of errors: false positives, and false negatives.

A cost function assigns fixed weights to each type of error:

 Total Cost = Penrolled·FNIR·CFN + (1-Penrolled)·FPIR· CostFP

Penrolled - a priori probability that the subject is enrolled 

CFN - cost of a false negative

CFN - cost of a false positive

Cost Function Parameter values are chosen to be representative of 

a possible application.
Usage in Speech Recognition 

The NIST Speech Group specifies

cost parameters for every 

evaluation.

2008 Speaker

Recognition Evaluation:

Cost of a Miss: 10

Cost of a False Match: 1 

Probability of mate: 0.01
Motivation for Cost Model in IREX IV 

It has been claimed that iris software developers have the 

ability to “change the shape” of the DET curve.

FPIR

FNIR
Motivation for Cost Model in IREX IV 

It has been claimed that iris software developers have the 

ability to “change the shape” of the DET curve.

FPIR

FNIR
What else? 

The evaluation is open to anyone academic institution and 

commercial organization wishing to participate.

Expect an official announcement on the IREX homepage shortly:

http://www.nist.gov/itl/iad/ig/irex.cfm

Timeline:

 The API and CONOPS will be posted later this month.

 We expect to receive SDK submissions in April.

 A public report on cost models and initial compresson results 

by the end of July.

 A report on JPEG 2000 compression profiles later this year.
Thank You

http://www.nist.gov/itl/iad/ig/irex.cfm 

irex@nist.gov
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65649-65650]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26261]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 344-000]


Southern California Edison Company; Notice of Designation of 
Certain Commission Personnel as Non-Decisional

    Commission staff members Katherine Liberty (Office of the General 
Counsel 202-502-6491; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b4dfd5c0dcd1c6dddad19ad8ddd6d1c6c0cdf4d2d1c6d79ad3dbc2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="620903160a07100b0c074c0e0b000710161b22040710014c050d14">[email protected]</span></a>) and Elizabeth Molloy 
(Office of the General Counsel; 202-502-8771; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6401080d1e050601100c4a090b08080b1d24020116074a030b12"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e98c858093888b8c9d81c7848685858690a98f8c9b8ac78e869f">[email protected]</span></a>) are assigned to help resolve issues related 
to the San Gorgonio Project No. 344.
    As ``non-decisional'' staff, Ms. Liberty and Ms. Molloy will not 
participate in an advisory capacity in any matters related to the San 
Gorgonio Project No. 344.


[[Page 65650]]


    Dated: October 30, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-26261 Filed 11-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### J. C. Baird *v.*Timothy Claney.

Bills and Notes — Inland Bill — Protest—Notice to Drawer — Action—Neces- . sary Averments.

If appellant had intended to hold the drawer of the bill responsible for the amount on the grounds of want of funds in the hands of the drawee, the fact must have been averred in the petition, and, further, that the appellee had notice of the protest.

APPEAL FROM BATH CIRCUIT COURT.

October 9, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

The instrument sued on is an inland bill of exchange and in order to charge the drawer it must in due time have been presented for acceptance, and if it was protested it was the duty of the holder to have notified the drawer thereof with proper diligence'of the protest. *Strader v. Bachelor,*8 *B. Mon.*169. And if appellant had intended to hold the drawer of the bill responsible for the amount on the ground of want of funds in the hands of the drawee, the fact must have been averred in the petition. *Frazier v. Harvie,*2 *Lit.*180. In this case it is neither averred in the petition that appellee had due notice of the protest, nor is it averred that he had no funds in the hands of the drawee, when the bill was drawn — and having failed to state *224a cause of action the court below did not err in the instruction complained of. Judgment *affirmed.*

*Lacy, for appellant.*

*Stone & Turner, for appellee.*
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 266 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 266

   Recognizing and congratulating Northeastern University on its one-
                         hundredth anniversary.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 9, 1997

 Mr. Moakley submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
              the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing and congratulating Northeastern University on its one-
                         hundredth anniversary.

Whereas on October 16, 1997, Northeastern University will mark its centennial, 
        celebrating 100 years as a vital institution of higher education in the 
        city of Boston;
Whereas from its humble beginnings at the Boston YMCA, as its founder and first 
        director, Franklin Palmer Speare, remarked, ``We started with an eraser 
        and two sticks of chalk'', Northeastern University has evolved into a 
        nationally recognized university offering educational opportunities to a 
        diverse student body from the city, the commonwealth, and around the 
        world;
Whereas in 1912 President William Howard Taft laid the cornerstone for the 
        present-day campus, which was expanded in 1929 when the Boston Red Sox 
        departed for a ``new'' Fenway Park;
Whereas Northeastern University has distinguished itself as the preeminent 
        practice-oriented university, serving as the national model for 
        cooperative education, where classroom education and professional 
        experience are successfully combined;
Whereas Northeastern University is emerging as a prominent research university, 
        where the work of talented scholars in a variety of disciplines is 
        advancing knowledge and contributing to the betterment of society; and
Whereas at the core of Northeastern University is its mission as an urban 
        university with an unwavering commitment to the city of Boston, as 
        evidenced by its longstanding partnership with the Boston public 
        schools, its varied community service programs, and its efforts to 
        promote economic development and housing creation in its neighborhood: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That--
            (1) Northeastern University is an outstanding educational 
        institution that has contributed uniquely to the urban fabric 
        of Boston; and
            (2) the House of Representatives congratulates Northeastern 
        University on its one-hundredth anniversary and wishes the 
        university much success throughout its centennial year.
                                 <all>
```
_________________________________________________________________________________ 

_________________________________________________________________________________ 

Subject: EXT :FW: Comments on Nist CSF 2.0 

Date: Thursday, March 9, 2023 1:03:19 PM 

Attachments: image001.png 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening 

attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. 

FYI 

From: Chris White 

Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2023 10:54 AM 

To: cyberframework <cyberframework@nist.gov> 

Subject: Comments on Nist CSF 2.0 

I would like to see the NIST CSF 2.0 adopt many of the concepts and ideas established by the Cyber 

Defense Matrix. Consideration and understanding on how the 5 pillars apply against the different 

asset classes, using the framework to determine gaps, as well as how each potential area leans 

toward Technical or People based solutions, but process spreads across all. 

I also believe that the idea of a new pillar, govern, doesn’t really help or support the function of NIST 

CSF. Governance as a pillar won’t really bring value to the CSF – by addressing the CSF cycle you are 

achieving governance. 

Chris White I CISO 

Ventech Solutions, Inc. 

www.ventechsolutions.com 

[gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com] 

_________________________________________________ DISCLAIMER: This message (including 

any attachments) may contain confidential, proprietary, privileged and/or private information. The 

information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity designated above. If you are not 

the intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately, and delete the 

message and any attachments. Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this 

message or any attachments by an individual or entity other than the intended recipient is 

prohibited. The security of our clients is a top priority. Therefore, we have put efforts into ensuring 

that the message is error and virus-free. Unfortunately, full security of the email cannot be ensured 

as, despite our efforts, the data included in emails could be infected, intercepted, or corrupted. 

Therefore, the recipient should check the email for threats with proper software, as the sender does 

not accept liability for any damage inflicted by viewing the content of this email.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 299

Expressing support for the States in adopting challenging academic standards

in core curricula.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 31, 1997

Mr. ETHERIDGE (for himself, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr.

LAFALCE, Mr. CLEMENT, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr.

PRICE of North Carolina, Ms. LOFGREN, Ms. FURSE, Mr. JOHNSON of

Wisconsin, Mr. BOSWELL, Mr. ROEMER, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Ms. DELAURO,

Ms. STABENOW, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mrs.

MEEK of Florida, Mr. MALONEY of Connecticut, Mr. HOYER, Mr.

CARDIN, Mr. RAHALL, and Mr. DINGELL) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the

Workforce

RESOLUTION

Expressing support for the States in adopting challenging

academic standards in core curricula.

Whereas we must improve student achievement in core educational curricula;

Whereas as a Nation we need to expect more of our students

and provide strong schools with clear and high standards

of achievement and discipline;

Whereas raising education standards in the core curricula has

gained momentum in States and local districts throughout the country;
2

•HRES 299 IH

Whereas many States are beginning to use academic standards to make clear what students should learn and what

teachers should teach;

Whereas standards help teachers and principals make decisions about developing their instructional programs without interfering with local curriculum decisions;

Whereas a standard measure of excellence can assist parents

to hold schools accountable for improved performance,

help teachers and principals improve curriculum and instruction, and give students a guide for charting their

own progress; and

Whereas the Department of Education is developing tests in

fourth grade reading and eighth grade mathematics

through a consensus process: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Members of the United States

2 House of Representatives support the 50 States adopting

3 challenging academic standards in core subjects, and the

4 development of rigorous tests to measure student achieve5 ment.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 343 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 343

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the award of 
 attorneys' fee, costs, and sanctions of $285,864.78 ordered by United 
 States District Judge Royce C. Lamberth on December 18, 1997, should 
                    not be paid with taxpayer funds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 1998

   Mr. Hayworth (for himself, Mr. Armey, Mr. Archer, Mr. Thomas, Mr. 
    DeLay, Mr. Boehner, Mr. English of Pennsylvania, Mr. Crane, Mr. 
   Livingston, Mr. Ramstad, Mr. Salmon, Mr. Sessions, and Mr. Stump) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the award of 
 attorneys' fee, costs, and sanctions of $285,864.78 ordered by United 
 States District Judge Royce C. Lamberth on December 18, 1997, should 
                    not be paid with taxpayer funds.

Whereas the President's Task Force on National Health Care Reform, convened by 
        President Clinton in 1993, was charged with calling together officials 
        of the Federal Government and others to debate critical health issues of 
        concern to the American Public;
Whereas the Task Force convened behind closed doors and inappropriately included 
        individuals who were not employees of the Federal Government;
Whereas United States District Judge Royce C. Lamberth ruled in Association of 
        American Physicians and Surgeons, Inc., et al. versus Hillary Rodham 
        Clinton, et al., that representatives of the administration engaged in 
        ``dishonest'' and ``reprehensible'' conduct in characterizing the 
        membership of the Task Force;
Whereas Judge Royce C. Lamberth on the basis of such conduct ruled against the 
        now-defunct Task Force, and ordered the defendants to pay $285,864.78 in 
        attorneys' fees, costs, and sanctions for the plaintiffs; and
Whereas American taxpayers should not be held responsible for the inappropriate 
        conduct of Federal Government officials and lawyers involved with the 
        Task Force: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the award of $285,864.78 in attorneys' fees, costs, and sanctions that 
Judge Royce C. Lamberth ordered the defendants to pay in Association of 
American Physicians and Surgeons, Inc., et al. versus Hillary Rodham 
Clinton, et al., should not be paid with taxpayer funds.
                                 <all>
```
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN**  .D 0. MILlW "n."PU February B3, 1939
Eon. Bert Ford,Admtniatntor 'Polar Liquor ControlBoard Austin, Texar

State' a8 828s th8 re8triOti States?* to has **been** plaged oftizenof thlr b-01 Act, impo8e e a oltlzsIl 0r the United ized thet one may be a a oitizen of the United rposes of the Liquor Control that your queetion shouldbe

Yourr very truly A'Z!ORH?ZYOEWRAL

OFTEXAS ASR:PBPa

# d--
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Unilava Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Baldwin Yung, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 11th day of April, 2011.








/s/ Baldwin YungBaldwin YungChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.1

Eastern Division

Sky Federal Credit Union, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02114

Honorable Edmond E. Chang

Fair Isaac Corporation, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, June 22, 2023:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The dismissal motions

[135], [138] remain under advisement. The tracking status hearing of 06/23/2023 is reset

to 08/25/2023 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case

will not be called). Emailed notice (mw, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02114 Document #: 169 Filed: 06/22/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:3403
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO






18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,






AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO






SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of XFormity Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), we,
Christopher Ball, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jack Rabin, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.




/s/ Christopher
Ball






Christopher
Ball, Chief Executive Officer






May 14,
2008






/s/ Jack
Rabin






Jack
Rabin, Chief Financial Officer






May 14,
2008
EXHIBIT 32.1: Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1850 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report  of  South  Texas  Oil  Company  (the
"Company") on Form  10-KSB  for the year ending  December 31, 2006  as  filed
with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Murray N. Conradie, Chief  Executive Officer  of  the  Company,
certify,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant   to
Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and that to  the best of  the
undersigned's knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in  all
material respects, the financial condition and result of  operations  of  the
Company.

                         /s/ Murray N. Conradie
                         -------------------------------------------
                         MURRAY N. CONRADIE, Chief Executive Officer

Dated: April 17, 2007