alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-20873 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DOROTHY POWELL, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-97-CR-168-12

- - - - - - - - - - August 25, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Dorothy Powell has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Powell has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See id. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.No. -2-
Exhibit 32.2 – Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Tarpon Coast Bancorp, Inc., theundersigned hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that this report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.     Date: May 6, 2005 /s/ Todd H. Katz      Todd H. KatzPresident
     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto Tarpon Coast Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Tarpon Coast Bancorp, Inc. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Board of Directors


China CGame, Inc.














CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated April 14, 2011 on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statement Form S-8 (File No. 333- 164456).








/s/ Samuel H. Wong & Co., LLPSan Mateo, California
Samuel H. Wong & Co., LLPApril 15, 2011
Certified Public Accountants
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 108

Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 9, 1997

Mr. MICA submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed

to

RESOLUTION

Designating majority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Member be, and

2 he is hereby, elected to the following standing committee

3 of the House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVER5 SIGHT: Mr. Portman.

Æ
2022 Western Region Assurance Program (WRAP)

May 16th to 19th, 2020

Reno/Sparks, NV

Where: Nugget Casino Resort

1100 Nugget Avenue

Sparks, NV 89431

Seminar Information: Find out more and register for WRAP on the NIST website:

https://www.nist.gov/news-events/events/2022/05/5782-western-regional-assurance-programwrap

Room Rate: $102 plus taxes (13.5 %, subject to change) and a $2.00 tourism surcharge per night.

*Additional persons will be charged $10 per person per night, with a maximum of four persons per room.

Reservations: You must call in your reservation to (775) 356-3300 no later than Monday, April 25, 2022.

Transportation from airport: The hotel offers a free shuttle to and from the airport. Runs daily 7 am to 8:30 pm.

It departs the Airport every hour on the half hour outside of baggage claim door D.

It departs the Nugget hotel every hour on the hour from the Valet parking area.

Meeting Room: Redwood 6 (located on the 2nd floor, see map below)

Nearby Things To Do - https://www.visitrenotahoe.com/things-to-do/

Sparks Places of Interest:

Sparks Heritage Museum – 0.3 mi; http://sparksmuseum.org/

Revision Brewing Company – 0.8 mi; https://revisionbrewing.com/

Downtown Reno Area:

Reno Aces Ballpark – 3.4 mi; https://greaternevadafield.com/

National Automobile Museum – 3.4 mi; https://automuseum.org/

Downtown Reno Library – 4.0 mi; https://www.washoecountylibrary.us/libraries/downtown-reno.php

Midtown District Reno:

Terry Lee Wells Nevada Discovery Museum – 4.0 mi; https://nvdm.org/

Nevada Museum of Art – 4.2 mi; https://www.nevadaart.org/

If you have any questions or need assistance, please contact:

James Kellames - 775-353-3788; jkellames@agri.nv.gov
#### Newland *v.*Nees.

A magistrate may have jurisdiction of a suit, though the plaintiff’s account exceed 100 dollars, if it be reduced by credits below that sum, and the balance only be demanded.

ERROR to the *Union*Circuit Court.

O. *H.*Smith, for the plaintiff.

*J. Rariden*and *M. M.*Ray, for the defendant.

Blackford, J.

Assumpsit by *Newland*against *Nees*before a justice of the peace. The plaintiff’s demand was on an account amounting to 176 dollars, hut which account he had reduced by credits to a sum under 100 dollars. The justice gave judgment in favour of the- plaintiff for 45 dollars; The Circuit Court, on appeal by the defendant, dismissed the cause. The ground of dismissal was, that as the whole amount of the debit side of the plaintiff’s account exceeded 100 dollars, the justice had no jurisdiction of the cause.

This judgment must be reversed. The statute says, that “in all actions of debt or assumpsit wherein the sum due or demanded shall be over 50 dollars, and not exceed 100 dollars, exclusive of interest and costs, justices and Circuit Courts shall have concurrent jurisdiction.” R. C. 1831, p. 297. The case before us was an action of assumpsit, and the sum demanded by the plaintiff, as due to him from the defendant, was less than 100 dollars. We think the cause is within the statute.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 167 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 167

   Providing special investigative authorities for the Committee on 
                    Government Reform and Oversight.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 1997

 Mr. Solomon submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing special investigative authorities for the Committee on 
                    Government Reform and Oversight.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. APPLICATION.

    This resolution shall apply to the investigation by the Committee 
on Government Reform and Oversight of political fundraising 
improprieties and possible violations of law.

SEC. 2. HANDLING OF INFORMATION.

    Information obtained under the authority of this resolution shall 
be--
            (1) considered as taken by the Committee on Government 
        Reform and Oversight in the District of Columbia, as well as at 
        the location actually taken; and
            (2) considered as taken in executive session.

SEC. 3. DEPOSITIONS AND INTERROGATORIES.

    The chairman of the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, 
after consultation with the ranking minority member of the committee, 
may--
            (1) order the taking of depositions or interrogatories 
        anywhere within the United States, under oath and pursuant to 
        notice or subpoena; and
            (2) designate a member of the committee or an attorney on 
        the staff of the committee to conduct any such proceeding.

SEC. 4. INTERNATIONAL AUTHORITIES.

    The chairman of the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, 
after consultation with the ranking minority member of the committee, 
may--
            (1) order the taking of depositions and other testimony 
        under oath anywhere outside the United States; and
            (2) make application for issuance of letters rogatory, and 
        request, through appropriate channels, other means of 
        international assistance, as appropriate.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 23





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Marisa Christina, Incorporated:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
33-91708 and 33-91080) on Form S-8 of Marisa Christina, Incorporated of our
report dated March 6, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Marisa Christina, Incorporated and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows and related schedule for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, which report appears in the
December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Marisa Christina, Incorporated.




New York, New York
March 28, 2001
#### G. and John T. Gudgell *v.*Harlan Moses.

Vendor and Purchaser — Parol Contracts — Delivery of Possession.

The contract between the parties was by parol and not binding on either. The delivery of the key to the dwelling house was only constructive possession which did not deprive the appellants of the actual possession.

APPEAL, PROM BATH CIRCUIT COURT.

October 21, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

The contract between the appellants and the appellee for the sale of the land was in parol and not binding upon either party.

In a few days after the parol contract was made the appellants hearing of the existence of some lien held by appellee on the land refused to accept the deed, and notified the appellee that the contract would not be consummated. The only possession that appellants ever had was a constructive possession by reason of the delivery to him of the key of the dwelling house. They never took actual possession of the premises and the key was offered to be returned in a few days after the parol sale was made. There was nothing to prevent the appellee from entering upon the land at any time; in fact, he had never been deprived of the right to enter or of the actual possession. In addition to all this the damage the land sustained was by reason of the travel by the neighborhood through this land by reason of the impassable condition of the roads during the winter, in which traveling the appellee participated in conjunction with his neighbors. The *647damage sustained, if any, was merely nominal, and caused by the failure of the appellee to keep up the fencing on his own land.

*Gudgell, Apperson, for appellants.*

*Turner, Reid & Stone, for appellee.*

The judgment is affirmed on the original and reversed on the cross-appeal and cause remanded with directions to dismiss appellant’s petition.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 215 (Thursday, November 6, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 65967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26425]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Determination Concerning a Petition to Add a Class of Employees 
to the Special Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and 
Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HHS gives notice of a determination concerning a petition to 
add a class of employees from the Simonds Saw and Steel Company in 
Lockport, New York, to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the 
Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 
(EEOICPA).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director, 
Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for 
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 1090 Tusculum Avenue, MS C-47, 
Cincinnati, OH 45226-1938, Telephone 1-877-222-7570. Information 
requests can also be submitted by email to [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Authority: [42 U.S.C.7384q].

    On October 9, 2014, the Secretary of HHS determined that the 
following class of employees does not meet the statutory criteria for 
addition to the SEC as authorized under EEOICPA:

    All Atomic Weapons Employer employees who worked at Simonds Saw and 
Steel Co. in Lockport, New York, from January 1, 1958, through December 
31, 2006.

John Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2014-26425 Filed 11-5-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
```
Case 2:16-mj-01037-JFM Document 3 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:16-mj-01037-JFM Document 3 Filed 01/21/16 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:16-mj-01037-JFM Document 3 Filed 01/21/16 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cole Credit Property Trust, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Cole Credit Property Trust, Inc.Date: March 29, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Christopher H. ColeName:
    Christopher H. ColeTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer,
President, and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
#### W. H. Soward *v.*Peyton Johnson.

Bills and Note — Set-Off—Beneficial Owner.

If Wings Johnson was the beneficial owner of the note sued on, such fact would have authorized the note held by Soward against him to be set off against it, even in the hands of the appellee.,

APPEAL FROM PIKE CIRCUIT COURT.

February 6, 1872.

*Rodman, for appellant.*

*Apperson & Reed, for appellee.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Lindsay :

The answer of Soward -presented- no sufficient reason for making Wings Johnson a party to this action.

If in point of fact he was the beneficial owner of the note sued on, proof that such was the case would have authorized the note held by Soward against him- to be set off against it, even in the hands of the appellees. The proof failed to- sustain this hypothesis, and the verdi-ct in favor of the appellee was therefore correct.

Perceiving no error in -the action of -the -circuit court as to the law of the case the judgment must be *affirmed.*
EXHIBIT 11
                              COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


                                                     Three months ended     
                                                          June 30,
                                                          --------
                                                    1998              1997
                                                    ----              ----
Net Income                                        $544,000         $434,000
                                                ==========       ==========
Average shares outstanding                       2,352,696              N/A
                                                ==========
Basic earnings per share                             $0.22              N/A
                                                ==========  
Net Income                                        $544,000         $434,000
                                                ==========       ==========
Average shares outstanding                       2,352,696              N/A
Net effect of dilutive stock options                    --              N/A
                                                ----------
Total shares outstanding                         2,352,696              N/A
                                                ==========
Diluted earnings per share                           $0.22              N/A
                                                ==========
Exhibit 99.3

                        Independent Accountant's Report


Lehman ABS Corporation, as Depositor
745 Seventh Avenue
New York, New York 10019

U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee
Corporate Trust Department
100 Wall Street
New York, NY 10005

Re:  Corporate Backed Trust Certificates, Goldman Sachs Capital I
     Securities-Backed Series 2004-7 Trust (the "Trust")

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have examined assertions of Lehman ABS Corporation (the "Depositor") and
U.S. Bank National Association, (the "Trustee" and, together with the
Depositor, the "Management") that the Depositor and the Trustee have complied,
in all material respects, with the provisions of the Standard Terms for Trust
Agreements dated as of January 16, 2001, as supplemented by a series
supplement dated as of April 30, 2004 (together, the "Trust Agreement") in
respect of the Corporate Backed Trust Certificates, Goldman Sachs Capital I
Securities-Backed Series 2004-7 Trust (the "Trust"), during the period covered
by the annual report on Form 10-K filed by the Depositor on behalf of the
Trust for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Annual Report"). Management
is responsible for compliance with the Trust Agreement. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on Management's assertions based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Depositor's and the Trustee's
compliance with the Trust Agreement and performing such other procedures as
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material
respects, with the Trust Agreement during the period covered by the Annual
Report and Management's assertions with respect to such compliance are fairly
stated, in all material respects, for the year ended December 31, 2004.


/s/ Aston Bell, CPA


New York, New York
March 22, 2005
#### ANNA DAVIS, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF M. RAYMOND DAVIS, Jr., DECEASED, APPELLANT, v. NEW YORK SHIPBUILDING CORPORATION, A CORPORATION, RESPONDENT.

Submitted February 16, 1945

Decided April 19, 1945.

For the appellant, *Horace G. Brown.*

For the respondent, *Bocco Palese.*

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bodine, J.

The appeal in this case is from a judgment of nonsuit. The action was styled one at common law to recover damages because of the death of plaintiff’s intestate by reason of negligence.

The deceased was in the defendant’s employ. In order to cure himself of a minor ill he took what he supposed to be Sal Hepática but what was in reality potassium cyanide. Upon the Sal Hepática bottle, in which the poison was placed, ivas written in three places the Word “poison.” It appears that a fellow workman was obliged, in the discharge of his duties, to case harden pieces of metal. To do this he used the potassium cyanide. He had on a bench an old bottle which had contained Sal Hepática. He picked it up and filled it with the potassium cyanide, having printed with red crayon the word mentioned. When not in use the bottle was kept among his personal belongings in a metal tray alongside of his desk.

The deceased apparently searching for something to take to relieve his condition picked up the bottle from the fellow employee’s tray in his absence and took the fatal dose. The *19occurrence was unfortunate, but there was nothing in the proofs to charge the respondent with knowledge of the presence of the poison in a re-labeled bottle or of lack of care in any other particular. A prior proceeding in the Compensation Bureau failed. There seems to have been no appeal.

The judgment is affirmed.

*For affirmance*— Tins Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Bqdine, Donges, JIeiier, Persiste, Porter, Colie, Wells, Rafferty, Thompson, Dill, Freund, JJ. 15.

*For reversal*— Xone.
Case: 1:20-cv-02788 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/08/20 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1
Case: 1:20-cv-02788 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/08/20 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:2
Case: 1:20-cv-02788 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/08/20 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:3
Case: 1:20-cv-02788 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/08/20 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:4
Case: 1:20-cv-02788 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/08/20 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:5