alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2000 and the Consolidated Statement
of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2000, which are contained in
the body of the accompanying Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          34,229
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,282
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            177,635
<PP&E>                                          12,159
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 279,458
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                      64,955
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                              15,223
<LONG-TERM>                                      1,217
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       210,019
<OTHER-SE>                                    (11,956)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   279,458
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                6,001
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                             1,993
<COMMISSIONS>                                    5,676
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                   16,696
<FEE-REVENUE>                                   38,777
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 222
<COMPENSATION>                                  46,223
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,556
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       8,556
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,417
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12


</TABLE>
January 19, 2018

Submitted via E-Mail to cyberframework@nist.gov 

Matthew Barrett

National Institute of Standards and Technology 

100 Bureau Drive, Mail Stop 8930 

Gaithersburg, MD 20899 

RE: AWWA response to NIST’s Solicitation for Comments on “Cybersecurity Framework Version 1.1 Draft 2”

The American Water Works Association (AWWA) appreciates the opportunity to respond to the National Institute 

of Standards and Technology (NIST) Solicitation for Comments on the Cybersecurity Framework Version 1.1, Draft 

2. AWWA has been actively promoting use of the Cybersecurity Framework (‘Framework’) since it was first issued 

in 2014. We were one of the first organizations to provide a voluntary, sector-specific approach for implementing 

the Framework based on a use-case approach that allows the users to prioritize the control measures applicable 

to a given function(s). 

We commend NIST for the collaborative process used to develop and refine the Framework with stakeholders. 

The revisions outlined in Draft 2 reflect our interest in maintaining flexibility in how the Framework is applied to 

support an entity’s cybersecurity risk management needs. The clarification that the Framework is intended to be 

a resource for self-assessment aligns well with the AWWA resources that have been developed to provide a 

tailored review of applicable controls for various use-cases. The addition of supply chain controls is appropriate, 

but would note the absence of reference to NIST SP 800-191 in the Framework Core. AWWA will work to 

incorporate these updates into our resources once finalized by NIST. 

AWWA, an awardee of the 2016 NIPP Resilience Challenge, has launch a national initiative to promote the use of 

the Framework in the water sector based the resources we have developed. Given this experience, we do find 

the Tiering process to be the least valuable aspect of the Framework. While the conceptual purpose is 

understandable, it tends to be a distraction from the primary objective of making these essential cybersecurity 

risk management practices more accessible, and in a format that supports continued monitoring by utility 

managers. As noted in prior comments, AWWA’s use-case tool generates a prioritized list of controls that 

supports self-assessment and risk management. This self-assessment approach allows the user to “right-size” the 

controls for any given system function being reviewed. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or Kevin Morley in our Washington Office.

Yours Sincerely,

G. Tracy Mehan, III

Executive Director – Government Affair

Government Affairs Office

1300 Eye Street NW, Suite 701W

Washington, DC 20005-3314

T 202.628.8303

F 202.628.2846
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of LogSearch, Inc. (the Corporation) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended October 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James Durward, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

|Date: December 28, 2006 |  | By:/s/ James Durward  Name:  James Durward  Title:  CEO, principal executive officer, principal  financial officer and principal accounting officer
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        | 
|                        | 
|                        | 

---
#### Hugh Thomas *v.*Jas. D. Miller and Wife.

Descent and Distribution — Infant’s Title by Descent From Father-Mother Has No Interest — Dower.

Where an infant dies, having derived title to real estate, by descent from the father, the mother acquires no right or title to such land, but the same passes by descent to the next of kin on the father’s side, but the widow has her dower therein.

Executors and Administrators — Claim Against Decedent’s Estate — Must Settle Accounts Before Selling Real Property.

If an administrator has a claim against the estate he should make a settlement of his accounts before he subjects- the real estate to the payment of his debt.

*350APPEAL FROM ADAIR CIRCUIT COURT.

February 22, 1872.

*Winfrey & Winfrey, for appellant.*

*Jaynes, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

There is no proof whatever in this record showing any evidence of fraud or mistake in the execution of the notes by the appellant to Mrs. Miller. The appellant was the administrator of James B. Thomas, deceased, and nearly related to him and was as much cognizant of the condition of his estate and perhaps more so than his widow. The purchase by him was a chancing or speculative bargain and if he has lost by it he alone must suffer. The judgment in the case, however, is erroneous. The mother did not inherit the land in controversy from her infant child. Where an infant dies having derived real estate by descent from the father, the mother acquires no right or title in and to such land owned by the infant, but the same passes by descent to the next of kin on the father’s side. See section 9, revised statutes, title, descent and distribution. The judgment in this case directs the sale of the absolute right and title in and to the fifty acres of land upon the supposition that it belonged to Mrs. Miller. The only interest she had in it was her dower as the widow of James B. Thomas, and this alone could have been sold under the judgment. The holders of the legal title to this land are all before the court and they are not complaining of the judgment in the court below. The heirs of the infant child of Mrs. Miller could all be made parties to this controversy, and a judgment rendered subjecting only the dower interest to the payment of these notes. If the appellant has any claims against J. B. Thomas, deceased, or his estate, as he is the administrator, he should make a settlement of his accounts, and if there is any indebtedness the real estate can be subjected by a proper proceeding, and with this view his alleged set-off should be dismissed without prejudice.

The judgment of the court below is reversed, only so far as it seeks to sell the absolute estate in this fifty acres of land and for further proceedings not inconsistent with, this opinion, and with directions to dismiss appellant’s alleged set-off without prejudice.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LAURA DURGARYAN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-72724

Agency No. A079-248-711

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 8, 2014** 

Pasadena, California

Before: FERNANDEZ, N.R. SMITH, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Laura Durgaryan petitions for review of the order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s

(IJ) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction

FILED

APR 14 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Review for substantial evidence, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453

F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006), we deny the petition for review.

Even if we were to assume Durgaryan suffered from past persecution based

on any one or all three incidents, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s

determination that the incidents were not committed by the Armenian government

or by forces that it was unable or unwilling to control. See Doe v. Holder, 736 F.3d

871, 878 (9th Cir. 2013).

Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s determination that Durgaryan

does not have a well-founded fear of future persecution based on her Pentecostal

religion. Durgaryan failed to present objective evidence that Pentecostals in

Armenia face persecution on account of their religion. See Molina-Estrada v. INS,

293 F.3d 1089, 1096 (9th Cir. 2002) (“[T]he IJ and the BIA are entitled to rely on

all relevant evidence in the record, including a State Department report, in

considering whether the petitioner has demonstrated that there is good reason to

fear future persecution.”).

Because Durgaryan failed to establish eligibility for asylum, her claim for

withholding of removal necessarily fails. See Zehatye, 453 F.3d at 1190.

Finally, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief

because Durgaryan failed to establish that she more likely than not will be tortured

2
if she returns to Armenia. See Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738, 747-48

(9th Cir. 2008).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

3
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Washington Students to Speak with NASA Astronaut on Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"J2eQ3MLGaH\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/washington-students-to-speak-with-nasa-astronaut-on-space-station\/\">Washington Students to Speak with NASA Astronaut on Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/washington-students-to-speak-with-nasa-astronaut-on-space-station\/embed\/#?secret=J2eQ3MLGaH\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Washington Students to Speak with NASA Astronaut on Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"J2eQ3MLGaH\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/30509478486_5fff4559ab_o.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":399}
#### L. M. Sanders, Heirs, *v.*T. B. Sanders.

Improvements — Purchaser at Decretal Sale — Permanent Improvements.

The purchaser at a decretal sale is 'entitled to pay for permanent improvements put on the land after the confirmation of the sale, to the extent that such improvements enhance the selling value of the land.

Improvements — Purchaser at Decretal Sale — Undivided Interest Sold — - Pay for Improvements Must be Proportioned.

Where an undivided interest, only, is sold at decretal sale, the charge for permanent improvements, made after the confirmation of the report, must be proportioned according to interest in the land.

APPEAL PROM BOONE CIRCUIT COURT.

October 17, 1870.

*288
      *Carlisle & O’Hara, for appellants.*

Pryor, *for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

T. B. Sanders, the purchaser at the decretal sale, is entitled to pay for the permanent improvements put upon the lands, after the confirmation of the sale, to the extent that such improvements enhanced the selling value of the lands. His entrance upon the same can not be regarded as an intrusion, so far as these appellants are concerned and it does not appear that any complaint -has been made by the life tenant.

But it seems that the intestate owned, and the court sold only an undivided interest in the tract possessed by the life tenant, and'yet the judgment charges this undivided interest with the payment of the whole amount allowed appellee for his improvements, after the deduction on account of the life estate of Mrs. Sanders. This we regard as an error; the heirs of the intestate should only be charged with their proportionate share of allowance, as the improvements inure to the benefit of all the owners of the entire tract. The judgment as to the claim of appellee is therefore reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

** 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

** AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

** SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theAnnual Report of River Rock Entertainment Authority (the “Authority”) on Form10-K/A Amendment No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JacobA. Coughlin, Assistant Financial Controller (Principal Financial Officer) ofthe Authority, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Authority.
| By:                                                           | /s/ JACOB A.  COUGHLIN |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|--------|
| Jacob A.  Coughlin                                            |                   |
| Assistant  Financial Controller (Principal Financial Officer) |                   |
| April 17, 2007                                                |                   |
|                                                               |                        |        |  |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the River RockEntertainment Authority and will be retained by the River Rock EntertainmentAuthority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

ROBERT ANDREW FFRENCH,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”,

Defendants.

Civil Action No.: 1:20-cv-03178

Judge Matthew F. Kennelly

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cummings

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby files this Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal, without prejudice, as to the following Defendant(s) identified on Schedule A of the 

Complaint:

NO. DEFENDANT

7 Shenzhen Royal Silicone Product Co., Ltd.

DATED: September 7, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt (Bar No. 6207971)

Keith Vogt, Ltd.

111 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1700

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Telephone: 312-675-6079

E-mail: keith@vogtip.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case: 1:20-cv-03178 Document #: 58 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:778
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document was electronically filed on September 7, 2020 with the Clerk of the Court using the 

CM/ECF system, which will automatically send an email notification of such filing to all registered 

attorneys of record.

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt

Case: 1:20-cv-03178 Document #: 58 Filed: 09/08/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:779
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 443

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 21, 1998

Mr. FOLEY (for himself and Mr. Lantos) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

the Secretary of State should seek certain commitments

from the governments of Poland, Hungary, and the

Czech Republic regarding the payment of insurance benefits owed to victims of the Nazis (and their beneficiaries

and heirs) by those countries.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. SENSE OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

3 REGARDING PAYMENTS OWED BY POLAND,

4 HUNGARY, AND THE CZECH REPUBLIC TO

5 VICTIMS OF THE NAZIS.

6 (a) SENSE OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.—

7 It is the sense of the House of Representatives that in

8 future meetings and correspondence with the governments
2

•HRES 443 IH

1 of Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic, the Sec2 retary of State should—

3 (1) raise the issue of insurance benefits owed to

4 victims of the Nazis (and their beneficiaries and

5 heirs) by these countries as a result of the actions

6 taken by their communist predecessor regimes in na7 tionalizing foreign insurance companies and confis8 cating their assets in the aftermath of World War

9 II;

10 (2) seek to secure a commitment from the gov11 ernments of these countries to provide a full ac12 counting of the total value of insurance company as13 sets that were seized by their communist prede14 cessors and to share all documents relevant to un15 paid insurance claims that are in their possession;

16 and

17 (3) seek to secure a commitment from the gov18 ernments of these countries to contribute to the pay19 ment of these unpaid insurance claims in an amount

20 that reflects the present value of the assets seized by

21 the communist governments (and for which no com22 pensation had previously been paid).

23 (b) DEFINITION.—As used in this paragraph, the

24 term ‘‘victims of the Nazis’’ means persons persecuted

25 during the period beginning on March 23, 1933 and end-
3

•HRES 443 IH

1 ing on May 8, 1945, by, under the direction of, on behalf

2 of, or under authority granted by the Nazi government

3 of Germany or any nation allied with that government.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 23 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 23

   Repealing rule XLIX of the Rules of the House of Representatives 
          relating to the statutory limit on the public debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 1997

   Mr. Stearns (for himself and Mr. Smith of Michigan) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Repealing rule XLIX of the Rules of the House of Representatives 
          relating to the statutory limit on the public debt.

    Resolved, That rule XLIX of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is repealed.
                                 <all>
```