alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EL PASO COUNTY COMMUNITY 

COLLEGE DISTRICT,

 Appellant,

v.

ROSA GONZALEZ,

 

 Appellee.

 

§

§

§

 

§

§

§ 

 

§

'

'

No. 08-13-00258-CV

Appeal from the

243rd Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2008-3813)

 O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellee’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief until 

September 30, 2014. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE 

APPELLEE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Sam J. Legate, the Appellee’s Attorney, prepare the 

Appellee’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before September 30, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 16

th day of September, 2014.

PER CURIAM
Introduction: 

NIST Commercialization Efforts and 

NIST-on-a-Chip

Jim Olthoff

Acting Associate Director for Laboratory Programs
Session III: NIST-on-a-Chip

WE BELIEVE THAT TO ENABLE TECH TRANSFER WE MUST 

Identify the right partners at the right time

Make it easy for those partners to do business with NIST 

WE BELIEVE THAT TO ACCOMPLISH THIS WE MUST 

Work across the organization

WE BELIEVE IN LEARNING FROM OTHERS, EXPERIMENTATION 

AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT 

NIST-on-a-chip will serve as a test bed for these ideas
What is NIST-on-a-Chip

It will take measurement services 

out of the lab and directly to the 

end user

A suite of quantum-based 

measurement technologies

NIST-on-a-Chip can be deployed 

nearly anywhere and anytime

1

2

3
NIST-on-a-Chip Approach

To accelerate the 

commercialization of 

NIST-on-a-Chip 

technologies requires 

us to work across the 

organization

IP STRATEGY AND EXECUTION

The Technology Partnership Office sets the strategy for 

how NIST engages with industry

RESEARCH PROGRAMS

Laboratory Programs sets the direction for all research 

program at NIST

COORDINATION AND LOGISTICS

The Business Operations Offices provides project 

management and process engineering support for NIST 

services
#### STATE v. COX

No. 154P97

Case below: 125 N.C.App. 616

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 June 1997.
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT FOF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 March 1, 2010
    /s/ Michael H. LeeMichael H. LeePresident and Chief Executive Officer March 1, 2010
    /s/ Francis M. ColalucciFrancis M. ColalucciSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
EXHIBIT 32.33

 

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary L. Paxton, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

/s/ Gary L. Paxton

Gary L. Paxton

Chief Executive Officer

February 26, 2007

 

 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. and will be retained by Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Metal Management, Inc.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03202

Honorable Thomas M. Durkin

Factory Mutual Insurance Company

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, September 10, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: The parties reported that

they have reached a settlement. The 9/10/2021 telephone status hearing is vacated. A joint

status report is due by 10/12/2021, unless a stipulation of dismissal is filed before then.

Mailed notice. (ecw, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03202 Document #: 42 Filed: 09/10/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:266
1

The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-1968

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

v. * District of Missouri.

* 

Maurice Thomas Poindexter, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: November 7, 2003

Filed: December 1, 2003

___________

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

After a bench trial, Maurice Poindexter was convicted of being a felon in

possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Poindexter requested

that his federal sentence be ordered to run concurrently with his undischarged state

probation-revocation sentence. Rejecting that request, the district court1

 imposed a
-2-

120-month prison term to run consecutively to his state sentence, plus 3 years

supervised release. Poindexter appeals.

Upon de novo review, see United States v. Ashley, 342 F.3d 850, 852 (8th Cir.

2003), we affirm the sentence imposed by the district court, see United States v.

Smith, 282 F.3d 1045, 1047-48 (8th Cir. 2002) (U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3, comment. (n.6) is

binding on federal sentencing courts and mandates that sentence imposed on

defendant for crime committed during probation must run consecutively to any

resulting sentence for probation revocation). 

______________________________
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Bill Keeter","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/wkeeter\/","title":"Erica Rodgers","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"zeFNVsESJX\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/erica-rodgers\/\">Erica Rodgers<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/erica-rodgers\/embed\/#?secret=zeFNVsESJX\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Erica Rodgers” — NASA\" data-secret=\"zeFNVsESJX\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/20180814-_3bi2669.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":750}
No. 07-14-00101-CR

Victoria Morin

Appellant

v.

The State of Texas

Appellee §

§

§

§ From the County Court at Law No. 2

of Lubbock County

November 16, 2015

Opinion by Justice Pirtle

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated November 16, 2015

, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis

, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Garrett Shea","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/garrett-shea-1nasa-gov\/","title":"SEH 6.0 Crosscutting Technical Management","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Mv9kFQG9wy\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/reference\/6-0-crosscutting-technical-management\/\">SEH 6.0 Crosscutting Technical Management<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/reference\/6-0-crosscutting-technical-management\/embed\/#?secret=Mv9kFQG9wy\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“SEH 6.0 Crosscutting Technical Management” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Mv9kFQG9wy\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 15.36

 

 

 

October 26, 2009

 

Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc.

5330 East 31st Street

Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135

 

We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial information of Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. and subsidiaries for the periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, as indicated in our report dated October 26, 2009; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no        opinion on that information.

 

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly        Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-79603, No. 333-89189, No. 333-33144,        No. 333-33146, No. 333-50800, No. 333-128714 and No. 333-152401 on Form S-8 and No. 333-161027 on Form S-3.

 

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Tulsa, Oklahoma
H. Res. 370

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 26, 1998.

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and that

she is hereby, elected to the following standing committee of

the House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Ms. Vela ́zquez to

rank directly above Mr. LaFalce.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-1750
In Re: ALAN B. HERMAN, Debtor.

_________________________ ALAN B. HERMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SIDNEY L. SYNA, Defendant - Appellee.
No. 97-1751
In Re: ALAN B. HERMAN, Debtor.

_________________________ ALAN B. HERMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARILYN HERMAN, Defendant - Appellee.2 Appeals from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA96-3489-DKC, BK-94-1-3259-PM, AP-94-1889-PM, CA-96-3490-DKC, AP-94- 1890-PM) Submitted: June 23, 1998 Decided: July 13, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Charles Masselli, MASSELLI & LANE, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Appellant. Sidney L. Syna, Marilyn Herman, Appellees Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: In appeal No. 97-1750, Appellant appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s determination that sixty percent of the debts owed to his former spouse’s attorney were nondischargeable debts in his bankruptcy case. In appealNo. 97-1751, Appellant appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s determination that sixty percent ofthe debts owed to his former spouse were nondischargeable in bankruptcy. We have reviewed the records and the district court’s opinions affirming the decisions of the bankruptcy court and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Herman v. Syna , Nos. CA-96-3489-DKC, BK-94-1-3259- PM, AP-94-1889-PM (D. Md. May 5, 1997); Herman v. Herman, Nos. CA96-3490-DKC, BK-94-1-3259-PM, AP-94-1890-PM (D. Md. May 5, 1997).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Xenonics Holdings, Inc
(the "Company") hereby certifies that:

          (i)  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal
     year ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
     requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated: December 21, 2004                            /s/  Alan P. Magerman
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Alan P. Magerman
                                              Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

<PAGE>

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Xenonics Holdings, Inc
(the "Company") hereby certifies that:

          (i)  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal
     year ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
     requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated: December 21, 2004                             /s/  Donna G. Lee
                                                     --------------------------
                                                     Donna G. Lee
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### R. Richardson *v.*D. Sheldon, etc.

Wills — Intoxication—Mental Capacity — Undue Influence — Revocation Prevented.

A judgment, based on a verdict setting aside a will, will not be disturbed where the proof shows that the testator was old and of intemperate habits at the time of the execution of the instrument, especially where he was under the influence of his wife, and from the further fact that the paper was carried to another state and eventually fell into the hands of the appellant, which perhaps prevented its effectual revocation.

APPEAL PROM KENTON CIRCUIT COURT.

April 11, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Hardin:

Although the weight of the evidence conduces to the conclusion that Otho Richardson dictated the paper in contest, as his will, and although then intoxicated, he possessed sufficient mental capacity to make a valid will, if wholly free from undue influence. We do not feel authorized under all the circumstances of this case to reverse the judgment of the circuit court, founded on the verdict of a jury who heard the evidence.

It does not appear that the testator’s daughters were not all equally worthy of his bounty with the • appellant, the favored devisee, and the gross inequality in the devises of the will is only explained by the fact that the testator’s age and intemperate habits operated to subject him' to the influence of his wife and son residing with him, the former of whom was un*436friendly with his daughter who, having married, were separated from him.

*Collins & Drane, for appellant.*

*Éllis, for appellees.*

It seems that at her suggestion he placed the páper in the hands of a particular person, who carried it to Illinois, and that this circumstance, and the fact that it afterwards fell into the hands of the appellant perhaps prevented its effectual revocation.

These and other facts disclosed on the trial no doubt led the jury to the very reasonable conclusion that the paper in contest was not at first the result of the free and unbiased judgment and deliberate intention of Otho Richardson; and, considering the peculiar and superior advantages which the jury and court below had for determining the weight of the evidence, we are constrained to concur in their decision.

Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed.*
NICE Community Coordinating Council

Meeting Agenda

May 25, 2022 | 3:15-5:00 p.m. ET

BlueJeans: https://primetime.bluejeans.com/a2m/live-event/dpqyhydw

Dial In: +1 (800) 520- 9950 | PIN 1675270 #

I. Introduction and Ground Rules – NICE Program Manager Susana Barraza

II. Opening Remarks

a. Industry Co-Chair – Jon Brickey, Senior Vice President, Mastercard

b. Government Co-Chair - Rodney Petersen, Director of NICE

III. Standing Items

a. Report Roundup – Learning from Good Ideas

Re-Imagining Orlando’s Talent Supply- An Orlando Cybersecurity Talent Deep Dive

Presented by Danielle Permenter, Orlando Economic Partnership

URL: https://news.orlando.org/blog/new-report-dives-deep-into-orlandoscybersecurity-talent-opportunities/

IV. Featured Topic

a. 2022 NICE Conference & Expo (Atlanta, Georgia) – June 6-8, 2022

Presented by Randy Pestana and Paola Hechavarria

URL: https://niceconference.org/

V. Working Group Updates

a. Promote Career Discovery

Co-chairs: Roland Varriale II, Argonne National Laboratory; Jimmy Baker, Arrow 

Electronics; Keith Davis, Koinonia Family Life, Inc. 

b. Transform Learning Process

Co-chairs: Richard Spires, Learning Tree; Dr. Donna Schaeffer, Marymount University

c. Modernize Talent Management

Co-chair: Lynsey Caldwell, Leidos; Kevin Perry, United States Army

VI. Community of Interest Updates

a. Apprenticeships in Cybersecurity

Co-chairs: Tony Bryan, CyberUp

b. Cybersecurity Skills Competitions

Co-chairs: David Zeichick, California State University, Chico

c. K12 Cybersecurity Education

Co-chair: Terrance Campbell, CCTE Cybersecurity Teacher, Shelby County Schools; Laurin

Buchanan, Secure Decisions; Thomas Trevethan, Palo Alto Networks 

d. NICE Framework Users
Karen Wetzel, Manager of the NICE Framework

VII. Project Progress Reports

a. NICE K12 Cybersecurity Education Conference (Virtual) – December 5-6, 2022

Presented by Amber Lindsay, President and CEO, iKeepSafe

URL: https://www.k12cybersecurityconference.org/

b. US Cyber Games

Presented by Bradley Wolfenden, Director, Cyber Sports, Katzcy

URL: https://www.uscybergames.com/

VIII. Standing Items Cont.

a. Research Review- Driving Research on Effective Practices

2021 Social Engineering Event

Presented by Dr. Aunshul Rege, Temple University

URL: https://sites.temple.edu/socialengineering/

b. Framework Feature – Applications and Uses of Workforce Framework for Cybersecurity 

NICE Framework and SFIA Framework Mapping

Presented by Ian Seward, General Manager, SFIA Foundation

URL: https://sfia-online.org/en/tools-and-resources/sfia-views/sfia-view-informationcyber-security/mapping-nice-work-roles-to-sfia-skills

IX. Closing Remarks and Next Meeting Reminder

The next NICE Council Meeting will be June 22, 2022 at 3:30 p.m. ET.