alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of United PanAm Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Garland Koch, certify in my capacity as Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (a) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto signed this Certification as
of November 1, 2005.



/s/    GARLAND KOCHGarland Koch Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

DECKERS OUTDOOR CORPORATION, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

0ESHOP-2014, et al.,

 Defendants.

Case No. 20-cv-02930

Judge Thomas M. Durkin

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL UNDER RULE 41(a)(1)

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Deckers 

Outdoor Corporation (“Plaintiff”) hereby dismiss this action with prejudice as to the following 

Defendants:

Defendant Name Line No.

AERUILBV 44

bihan0465296 60

Brodey Ryan 64

HeersiTrade 118

HHCHEN 122

James Moo 137

John Rodr 152

lihai store 170

mugua store 196

qixie794510 213

Sunshine 007 240

tibetan wolf 248

UntilUlouve 258

worktouyoubiege 271

Case: 1:20-cv-02930 Document #: 39 Filed: 07/02/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:11265
2

Dated this 2nd day of July 2020. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ RiKaleigh C. Johnson

Amy C. Ziegler 

Justin R. Gaudio

Allyson Martin

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500

Chicago, Illinois 60606

312.360.0080 / 312.360.9315 (facsimile)

aziegler@gbc.law

jgaudio@gbc.law

rjohnson@gbc.law

Counsel for Plaintiff Deckers Outdoor Corporation

Case: 1:20-cv-02930 Document #: 39 Filed: 07/02/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:11266
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE FORM

NOTE: In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this 

Court’s general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by Local Rules 83.12 through 

83.14.

In the Matter of Case Number:

10 10C10

20 CR 231

United States v. Yen Yung

AN APPEARANCE IS HEREBY FILED BY THE UNDERSIGNED AS ATTORNEY FOR:

(In the space below, enter the name of the party or parties being represented)

YEN YUNG

NAME (Type or print)

Matthew J. McQuaid

SIGNATURE (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically)

 s/Matthew J. McQuaid

FIRM

STREET ADDRESS 120 N. LaSalle Suite 2000

CITY/STATE/ZIP Chicago, Illinois 60602

ID NUMBER (SEE ITEM 3 IN INSTRUCTIONS) 6209489 TELEPHONE NUMBER 312-952-6524

ARE YOU ACTING AS LEAD COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? (Enter “Y” or “N”) Y

ARE YOU ACTING AS LOCAL COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? (Enter “Y” or “N”)

ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THIS COURT’S TRIAL BAR? (Enter “Y” or “N”) Y

IF THIS CASE REACHES TRIAL, WILL YOU ACT AS THE TRIAL ATTORNEY? (Enter “Y” or “N”) Y

IF THIS IS A CRIMINAL CASE, USE AN “X” TO DESCRIBE YOUR STATUS IN THIS CASE.

RETAINED COUNSEL APPOINTED COUNSEL XX
EXHIBIT  15.29

 

 

 

November 7, 2007

 

Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc.

5330 East 31st Street

Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135

 

We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of thePublic Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial information of Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group,Inc. and subsidiaries for the periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, as indicated in our report dated November 7, 2007; because we did not performan audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

 

We are aware that our report referred to above, whichis included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, is incorporated by reference in RegistrationStatements No. 333-79603, No. 333-89189, No. 333-33144, No. 333-33146, No. 333-50800, and No. 333-128714 on Form S-8.

 

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuantto Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by anaccountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

 

/s/  Deloitte & Touche LLP

Tulsa, Oklahoma
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 369 Agreed to House (ATH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 369

 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 1998

 Mr. Fazio of California submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and that they are 
hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on Small Business: Ms. Velazquez to rank directly above 
Mr. Sisisky.
    Committee on Banking and Financial Services: That the powers and 
duties conferred upon the ranking minority member by House rules shall 
be exercised by the next senior member until otherwise ordered by the 
House.
                                 <all>
```
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 404

Commemorating 100 years of relations between the people of the United

States and the people of the Philippines.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 31, 1998

Mr. GILMAN (for himself, Mr. HAMILTON, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. SMITH of New

Jersey, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. MENENDEZ, and Mr.

FALEOMAVAEGA) submitted the following resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Commemorating 100 years of relations between the people

of the United States and the people of the Philippines.

Whereas 1998 marks 100 years of special ties between the

people of the United States and the people of the Philippines and is also the centennial celebration of Philippine independence from Spain which initiated relations

with the United States;

Whereas the people of the Philippines have on many occasions demonstrated their strong commitment to democratic principles and practices, the free exchange of views

on matters of public concern, and the development of a

strong civil society;
2

•HRES 404 IH

Whereas the Philippines has embraced economic reform and

free market principles and, despite current challenging

circumstances, its economy has registered significant economic growth in recent years benefiting the lives of the

people of the Philippines;

Whereas the large Philippine-American community has immeasurably enriched the fabric of American society and

culture;

Whereas Filipino soldiers fought shoulder to shoulder with

American troops on the battlefields of World War II,

Korea, and Vietnam;

Whereas the Philippines is an increasingly important trading

partner of the United States as well as the recipient of

significant direct American investment;

Whereas the United States relies on the Philippines as a

partner and treaty ally in fostering regional stability, enhancing prosperity, and promoting peace and democracy;

and

Whereas the 100th anniversary of relations between the people of the United States and the people of the Philippines

offers an opportunity for the United States and the Philippines to renew their commitment to international cooperation on issues of mutual interest and concern: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) congratulates the Philippines on the com3 memoration of its independence from Spain;

4 (2) looks forward to a broadening and deepen5 ing of friendship and cooperation with the Phil6 ippines in the years ahead for the mutual benefit of
3

•HRES 404 IH

1 the people of the United States and the people of the

2 Philippines;

3 (3) supports the efforts of the Philippines to

4 further strengthen democracy, human rights, the

5 rule of law, and the expansion of free market eco6 nomics both at home and abroad; and

7 (4) recognizes the close relationship between the

8 nations and the people of the United States and the

9 people of the Philippines and pledges its support to

10 work closely with the Philippines in addressing new

11 challenges as we begin our second century of friend12 ship and cooperation.

Æ
#### THOMAS A. FRASER ET AL., PROSECUTORS-APPELLANTS, v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION AND BOARD OF EDUCATION OF JERSEY CITY, RESPONDENTS.

Submitted October 26, 1945

Decided January 24, 1946.

For the appellants, *Fisenberg & Spicer.*

For the respondents, *Robert H. Doherty.*

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

The Supreme Court in the present litigation rested its decision on the prior case of *Greenway*v. *Board,*129 *N. J. L.*461, a decision of this court. The present case is submitted on briefs without oral argument, and counsel *598for appellants in their brief frankly concede that the Green-way ease as a precedent stands in the way of a decision in their favor, and as frankly ask that it be overruled. They made the same request to the Supreme Court, which very properly declined to disregard a decision of this court. We are now asked to decide this case contrary to that former decision, and without oral argument.

In *State*v. *Taylor,*68 *N. J. L.*276, a decision of this court, the fourth headnote reads: “This court will not revise, much less overturn, a decision made by it, upon a matter which was directly presented for its determination, except upon the fullest conviction that it is erroneous. And it will not do so, even then, when the decision has been so long acquiesced in, and acted upon, that a return to the proper principle would disastrously affect existing interests”: and in *Freeholders*v. *Jersey City, &c., Street Railway Co.,*85 *Id.*179 (at the foot of *p.*181), we quoted from *Kent’s Commentaries*as follows: “When a decision upon a point of law has been made upon solemn argument, and upon mature deliberation, the community have a right to regard it as a just declaration or exposition of the law, and to regulate their actions by it. When a rule has once been deliberately adopted and declared it ought never to be disturbed by the same court, except for very urgent reasons, and upon a clear manifestation of error,” citing also the Taylor case, *supra,*and *Bowman*v. *Freeholders,*73 *Id.*543. The present case does not exhibit .any such situation.

The judgment under review will be affirmed.

*For affirmance*— The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Colie, Olifhant, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, JJ. 13.

*For reversal*— None.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0679

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

REX WILLIAM ALLEN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 25, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 19 2023

07/19/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0679
#### Kyle I. AHART, individually and as Next Friend for His Minor Child Ahart, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joe VICKERY, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Investigator Hardin County Sheriffs Department, Ed Cain, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Hardin County Sheriff, and Hardin County, Texas, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-40030.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Dec. 8, 2004.

Kyle I. Ahart, Beaumont, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Andrea Neville Moore, Wrotenbery & Associates, Houston, TX, for DefendantAppellee.

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Ahart’s Rule 60(b)(3) motion for relief from judgment. Appellees failure to disclose Officer Vickery’s prior conviction did not prevent Ahart from fully and fairly presenting his case. *See Gov’t Fin. Servs. One Ltd. P’ship v. Peyton Place,*62 F.3d 767, 772 (5th Cir. 1995). The conviction was easily discoverable, and Ahart failed to respond to the Appellee’s motion for summary judgment. AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
H. Res. 136

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 1, 1997.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the resolution (H. Res. 129) providing amounts for the expenses of certain committees of the

House of Representatives in the One Hundred Fifth Congress. The resolution shall be considered as read for amendment. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on House Oversight now printed in the resolution shall be considered as adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the resolution, as amended, to final adoption without intervening motion or demand for division of the question except: (1) one

hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman
2

•HRES 136 EH

and ranking minority member of the Committee on House

Oversight; and (2) one motion to recommit.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.2

Eastern Division

United States of America, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02658

Honorable Gary Feinerman

Dairy Farmers of America, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTICE OF MANDATORY INITIAL DISCOVERY

The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key

features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP)

Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all

parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing

Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery

obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1).

Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents

(Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when

the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third−Party Complaint is served.

Case: 1:20-cv-02658 Document #: 10 Filed: 05/04/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:117
##### 





| |                                                                                                                           
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Exhibit 99.3  Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Tarpon Coast
Bancorp, Inc., the undersigned hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge,
that this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15
(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                       |  |                                        
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Date: November 4, 2002 |  | /s/ George E. Cline                    
|                       |  |                                        
|                       |  | George E. Cline
Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

JOHN E. BARRETT,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 225 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24th day of October, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 326 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     November 13, 1997.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution the Committee on 
Government Reform and Oversight may have not more eight subcommittees for the 
duration of the One Hundred Fifth Congress, notwithstanding clause 6(d) of rule 
X.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

YITZCHOK ROKOWSKY, on behalf of 

himself and all others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

VERICITY, INC., MEMBERS MUTUAL, 

FIDELITY LIFE ASSOCIATION, APEX 

HOLDCO L.P., ERIC RAHE, CALVIN 

DONG, SCOTT PERRY, RICHARD 

HEMMINGS, JAMES E. HOHMANN, 

JAMES SCHACHT, LINDA WALKER 

BYNOE, STEVEN GROOT, JOHN 

FIBIGER, and NEIL ASHE, 

 Defendants. 

 Case No. 1:20-cv-456 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

 Defendants Vericity, Inc., Members Mutual Holding Co., Fidelity Life Association, Apex 

Holdco L.P., Eric Rahe, Calvin Dong, Scott Perry, Richard Hemmings, James E. Hohmann, 

James Schacht, Linda Walker Bynoe, Steven Groot, John Fibiger, and Neil Ashe (collectively 

“Defendants”) move to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. 1) under Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 12(b)(6). 

Plaintiff’s Complaint should be dismissed in its entirety for several reasons. First, the 

Complaint is barred by the relevant statute of limitations. Second, the Complaint is an 

impermissible collateral attack on the decision of a state agency: the Illinois Department of 

Insurance, which approved the transaction Plaintiff is challenging in this case. Third, the 

individual counts in the Complaint are insufficient for multiple independent reasons, including 

Case: 1:20-cv-00456 Document #: 32 Filed: 06/03/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:124
2 

failing to plead the facts necessary to establish the causes of action under state law and naming 

improper defendants. 

Defendants’ brief filed with this motion explains the bases for dismissal in more detail. 

WHEREFORE, Defendants respectfully request that this Court enter an order dismissing 

Plaintiff’s Complaint with prejudice under Rule 12(b)(6), awarding Defendants their costs, and 

awarding Defendants any other appropriate relief. 

Date: June 3, 2020 

Respectfully submitted, 

VERICITY, INC., MEMBERS MUTUAL, 

FIDELITY LIFE ASSOCIATION, APEX 

HOLDCO L.P., ERIC RAHE, CALVIN 

DONG, SCOTT PERRY, RICHARD 

HEMMINGS, JAMES E. HOHMANN, 

JAMES SCHACHT, LINDA WALKER 

BYNOE, STEVEN GROOT, JOHN 

FIBIGER, and NEIL ASHE 

By: /s/ Eric S. Mattson

One of their attorneys 

Walter C. Carlson 

Eric S. Mattson 

Elizabeth Y. Austin 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

One South Dearborn 

Chicago, Illinois 60603 

Phone: (312) 853-7000 

wcarlson@sidley.com 

emattson@sidley.com 

laustin@sidley.com

Case: 1:20-cv-00456 Document #: 32 Filed: 06/03/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:125
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on June 3, 2020, I caused a copy of the foregoing Motion to Dismiss 

to be filed via the electronic filing system for the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of Illinois, which will send a Notice of Electronic Filing to all attorneys of record. 

/s/ Elizabeth Y. Austin 

Attorney for Defendants 

Case: 1:20-cv-00456 Document #: 32 Filed: 06/03/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:126
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

NIKE, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

THE PARTNERSHIPS and 

UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS 

IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 20-cv-03923 

Judge Thomas M. Durkin 

Magistrate Judge Gabriel A. Fuentes

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL UNDER RULE 41(a)(1) 

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Plaintiff Nike, Inc. 

(“Nike” or “Plaintiff”) hereby dismisses this action with prejudice as to the following Defendants: 

Defendant Name Line No. 

Shenzhen Becarin Apparel Co., ltd. 11

subaihe Official Store 105

zerlos Official Store 126

Case: 1:20-cv-03923 Document #: 36 Filed: 08/07/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:3737
2 

Dated this 7th day of August 2020. Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ RiKaleigh C. Johnson 

Amy C. Ziegler 

Justin R. Gaudio 

 RiKaleigh C. Johnson 

 Jake M. Christensen 

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. 

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

312.360.0080 / 312.360.9315 (facsimile) 

aziegler@gbc.law 

jgaudio@gbc.law 

 rjohnson@gbc.law 

 jchristensen@gbc.law 

 Counsel for Plaintiff Nike, Inc. 

Case: 1:20-cv-03923 Document #: 36 Filed: 08/07/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:3738