alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, COLOR KINETICS INCORPORATED
I, George G. Mueller, Chief Executive Officer, Color Kinetics Incorporated,certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Color Kinetics Incorporated 2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement ofmaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this Quarterly Report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this Quarterly Report is being prepared;  b) [omitted]  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure  d) controls and procedures and presented in this QuarterlyReport our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this Quarterly Report based on suchevaluation; and disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant rolein the registrant’s internal controls.           November 15, 2004  /s/George G. Mueller              Date George G. Mueller     Chief Executive Officer  
18
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**Certification**

 

I,John Fitzpatrick, certify that:

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of WII Components, Inc.;

 

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e))for the registrant and have:

 

a.             Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.             Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c.             Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a.             Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b.             Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: March 28, 2008 |                 |
|---------------------------|----------------------|
|                      | /s/ John Fitzpatrick |   |

 
|   | John Fitzpatrick                      |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 317

Providing for the agreement of the House to the Senate amendment to

the bill, H.R. 2472, with an amendment.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 9, 1997

Mr. DAN SCHAEFER of Colorado submitted the following resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Providing for the agreement of the House to the Senate

amendment to the bill, H.R. 2472, with an amendment.

1 Resolved, That, upon the adoption of this resolution,

2 the bill H.R. 2472, to extend certain programs under the

3 Energy Policy and Conservation Act, be, and the same is

4 hereby, taken from the Speaker’s table to the end that

5 the Senate amendment to the text of the bill be, and the

6 same is hereby, agreed to with an amendment as follows:

7 In lieu of the matter proposed to be inserted by the Sen8 ate, insert the following:
2

•HRES 317 ATH

1 SECTION 1. ENERGY POLICY AND CONSERVATION ACT

2 AMENDMENTS.

3 The Energy Policy and Conservation Act is amend4 ed—

5 (1) in section 166 (42 U.S.C. 6246) by striking

6 ‘‘1997’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘1998’’;

7 (2) in section 181 (42 U.S.C. 6251) by striking

8 ‘‘September 30, 1997’’ both places it appears and

9 inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘September 1, 1998’’; and

10 (3) in section 281 (42 U.S.C. 6285) by striking

11 ‘‘September 30, 1997’’ both places it appears and

12 inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘September 1, 1998’’.

Æ
#### Isaac Calhoun *v.*Samuel A. Johnson.

Principal and Surety — Counter Security Given by a Wife to One Surety on Bond.

Counter security given by a wife to a surety on her husbands guardian’s bond, does not enure to the benefit of all the sureties thereon.

Same.

Her property, thus liable, would not be subject to sale by the surety, until a pro rata distribution of liability had been adjudged, and he had been compelled to pay same.

APPEAL PROM MCLEAN CIRCUIT COURT.

November 2, 1870.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Kobertson :

As Mrs. Shrader was a stranger'to the guardian’s bond by her husband as principal and Calhoun, Johnson and others as sureties, her mortgage of her estate to indemnify Calhoun alone against his own contributory liability does not enure to the benefit of his sureties as the like mortgage of the guardian’s estate might have done in equity.

Calhoun alone can enforce that mortgage for his own indemnity against ultimate loss which may result after final contribution among all the co-sureties, until such adjustment showing the loss for which aloné the mortgage assures indemnity, he cannot enforce that security.

As no such final contribution is shown to have been completed among the co-sureties of their insolvent principal and therefore Calhoun’s ultimate loss has not been ascertained, the circuit court erred in adjudging to- the appellee Johnson, as one of the co-sureties the whole fund deposited in court, by another co-surety. That fund should not be disturbed until full and final contribution shall have fixed Calhoun’s loss, and then, and not sooner, he may proceed on his mortgage.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded *163for further proceedings for adjusting the contributory liabilities of all the sureties.

*Owen, for appellant.*

*Johnson, for appellee.*
Exhibit
      32





ENERGENX,
      INC.





SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATIONS





In
      connection with the periodic report of ENERGENX, INC., a Nevada corporation
      (the
“Company”), on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, GARY A. BEDINI, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
      for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
      that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.





This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.





Date:
      March 31, 2008


By:
            /s/
              Gary
              A. BediniGary
              A. Bedini


In
      connection with the periodic report of ENERGENX, INC., a Nevada corporation
      (the
“Company”), on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, RICK M. STREET, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
      for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
      that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.





This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.





Date:
      March 31, 2008


By:
            /s/ Rick M. StreetRick
                M. Street
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Richard Southall

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03223

Honorable Edmond E. Chang

Force Partners LLC

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, December 22, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of the fully

briefed motion to dismiss [20], the tracking status hearing of 12/31/2020 is reset to

03/05/2021 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case

will not be called). Emailed notice (mw, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Tommy D. Simmons, Appellant

No. 06-13-00248-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 124th District Court of 

Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 42581-

B). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Morriss, Justice Carter and Justice Moseley

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the motion of the appellant to 

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Tommy D. Simmons, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JULY 18, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET OF KNOLOGY BROADBAND, INC. AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 AND THE RELATED COMBINED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000. THIS
INFORMATION IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          20,472
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,311,062
<ALLOWANCES>                                   688,528
<INVENTORY>                                 21,401,368
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,773,482
<PP&E>                                     316,751,433
<DEPRECIATION>                              45,756,112
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             329,301,815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       44,496,399
<BONDS>                                    328,598,858
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        499
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                 (62,892,293)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               329,301,815
<SALES>                                     13,264,811
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,293,597
<CGS>                                        6,195,069
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,869,322
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,195,645
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,288,222
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (23,771,370)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,756,666
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (22,015,704)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (22,015,704)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 12.1
 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 2010
    
    
    2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006Fixed Charges:Interest expensed & capitalized
    
    $
    28,842
    
    
    $
    45,870
    
    
    $
    20,515
    
    
    $
    19,326
    
    
    $
    26,486Amortized premiums, discounts, & capitalized expenses related to indebtedness
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Estimate of interest within rental expense
    
    
    13,702
    
    
    
    14,024
    
    
    
    13,635
    
    
    
    13,175
    
    
    
    12,757Preference security dividend requirements
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Total Fixed Charges
    
    $
    42,544
    
    
    $
    59,894
    
    
    $
    34,150
    
    
    $
    32,501
    
    
    $
    39,243Earnings:Pretax loss
    
    $
    (24,495
    )
    
    $
    (55,005
    )
    
    $
    (177,164
    )
    
    $
    (10,802
    )
    
    $
    (5,451
    )Fixed Charges
    
    
    42,544
    
    
    
    59,894
    
    
    
    34,150
    
    
    
    32,501
    
    
    
    39,243Amortization of capitalized interest
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Distributed income of equity investees
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Co. share of pre-tax losses of equity investees for which charges arriving
from guarantees are included in fixed charges
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Subtotal
    
    
    18,049
    
    
    
    4,889
    
    
    
    (143,014
    )
    
    
    21,699
    
    
    
    33,792Interest capitalized
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Preference security dividend requirements of consolidated subsidiaries
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Minority interest in pre-tax income of minority subsidiaries that have not
incurred fixed charges
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Total
    
    $
    18,049
    
    
    $
    4,889
    
    
    $
    (143,014
    )
    
    $
    21,699
    
    
    $
    33,792Ratio(1):
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
 
 (1)
    
    For purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, this calculation is
not performed for periods with a net loss before income taxes, since the ratio is not meaningful.
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 995

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that fees for Internet

and other online services are not, and shall not be, subject to tax,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 1997

Mr. WELDON of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify

that fees for Internet and other online services are not,

and shall not be, subject to tax, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tax-Free Internet Act

5 of 1997’’.
2

•HR 995 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION THAT FEES FOR INTERNET AND

2 OTHER ONLINE SERVICES ARE NOT, AND

3 SHALL NOT BE, SUBJECT TO TAX.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4253 of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 (relating to exemptions from tax on

6 communications services) is amended by redesignating

7 subsection (k) as subsection (l) and by inserting after sub8 section (j) the following new subsection:

9 ‘‘(k) CLARIFICATION OF EXEMPTION FOR FEES FOR

10 INTERNET AND OTHER ONLINE SERVICES.—

11 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in this subchapter

12 shall be construed to subject to tax under this sub13 chapter amounts paid for any Internet access serv14 ice, Internet access-related service, or online service,

15 and such amounts shall never be subject to any ex16 cise tax under this title without specific reference to

17 this subsection. The preceding sentence shall not

18 apply to communications services (as defined in sec19 tion 4251(b) as in effect on the date of the enact20 ment of this subsection).

21 ‘‘(2) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of paragraph

22 (1)—

23 ‘‘(A) INTERNET ACCESS SERVICE.—The

24 term ‘Internet access service’ means any service

25 that enables a customer to connect a computer

26 to the Internet.
3

•HR 995 IH

1 ‘‘(B) INTERNET ACCESS-RELATED SERV2 ICE.—The term ‘Internet access-related service’

3 means any service such as electronic mail, chat,

4 or bulletin boards or a browser, usually offered

5 by an Internet access service provider or an on6 line service provider.

7 ‘‘(C) ONLINE SERVICE.—The term ‘online

8 service’ means any service, offered over a tele9 communications network, which provides the

10 user with access to information and services on

11 a proprietary subscriber network.’’

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

13 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact14 ment of this Act.

15 SEC. 3. RESTRICTION ON USE OF APPROPRIATED FUNDS.

16 None of the funds appropriated by any Act may be

17 used by any Federal officer or employee to develop any

18 proposal for imposing any excise tax on amounts paid for

19 any service to which section 4253(k) of the Internal Reve20 nue Code of 1986 applies (as added by this Act).

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 25 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                       January 9, 1997.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and they are hereby, elected 
to the following standing committees:
    Committee on Science: Mr. Sensenbrenner, Chairman.
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. Talent, Chairman.
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Stump, Chairman.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```