alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7083** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. ALVIERO MESA

- LOPEZ , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United St ates District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville
. Henry F. Floyd , District Judge. ( 6:06

- cr - 00998

- HFF

- 5; 6:09

- cv - 70100

- HFF )

Submitted : February 16, 2012 Decided: February 21, 2012

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Alviero Mesa

- Lopez, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorney, Isaac Louis Johnson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE U NITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Alviero Mesa

- Lopez seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West
Su pp. 2011 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a const itutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural r uling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Mesa

- Lopez has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISS ED
| Exhibit 99.4 **Greenwich Capital Series 2004-GG1****Aggregate Statement of Principal and Interest Distributions to****Certificateholders****for January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004****Ending Principal****Class****Principal****Interest****Balance**R-I 0.00 0.00 0.00 A-1 12,056,527.34 191,632.45 11,364,472.66 A-2 0.00 3,367,727.65 150,541,000.00 A-3 0.00 6,943,160.00 274,000,000.00 A-4 0.00 8,210,300.00 296,000,000.00 A-5 0.00 10,876,109.37 381,830,000.00 A-6 0.00 2,995,416.69 100,000,000.00 A-7 0.00 31,188,126.27 1,005,555,000.00 B 0.00 1,956,136.28 61,802,000.00 C 0.00 829,679.62 26,021,000.00 D 0.00 1,640,051.25 52,043,000.00 E 0.00 1,040,025.50 32,527,000.00 F 0.00 1,059,948.29 32,527,000.00 G 0.00 847,971.67 26,022,000.00 H 0.00 1,271,924.93 39,032,000.00 J 0.00 206,804.78 6,505,000.00 K 0.00 413,641.41 13,011,000.00 L 0.00 413,641.41 13,011,000.00 M 0.00 310,223.06 9,758,000.00 N 0.00 310,223.06 9,758,000.00 O 0.00 206,836.56 6,506,000.00 OEA-B1 0.00 413,384.89 10,500,000.00 OEA-B2 0.00 570,864.84 14,500,000.00 P 0.00 1,344,313.67 42,285,095.00 R-II 0.00 0.00 0.00 XC 0.00 2,068,491.27 2,590,098,567.79 XP 0.00 6,940,313.37 2,460,098,000.00 LR 0.00 0.00 0.00 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

*CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Granite City Food & Brewery Ltd. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 28, 2003, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Monica A. Underwood, Interim Chief Financial Officer andCorporate Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.                                       theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Dated:  December  21, 2004 | By     | /s/ Monica  A. Underwood                                   |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 |   | Monica A.  Underwood                                       |
|                                 |   | Interim  Chief Financial Officer and  Corporate Controller |

 

----
1 

1032555\307501658.v1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

ERIN F GOTWALS, ) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) 

) 

vs. ) Case No. 20-cv-03455 

) 

MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., ) Hon. Martha M. Pacold 

MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, and ENCORE ) 

CAPITAL GROUP, INC., ) Magistrate Judge M. David Weisman 

) 

Defendants. ) 

JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

NOW COME Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their respective undersigned 

attorneys, and jointly move the Court for an extension of time to file a stipulation of dismissal 

with prejudice. In support of this motion, the parties respectfully state as follows: 

1. The parties are finalizing execution of the settlement agreement. Once the 

settlement agreement is executed, Defendant will issue payment and the case should be 

dismissed with prejudice. 

2. The parties request an additional 30 days to file a stipulation of dismissal with the 

Court. 

3. If the parties experience any other issues with documenting and finalizing the 

settlement, the parties will promptly notify the Court. 

[signatures on following page] 

Case: 1:20-cv-03455 Document #: 26 Filed: 02/10/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:93
2 

1032555\307501658.v1 

s/ Daniel Brown 

Celetha Chatman 

Michael Wood 

Community Lawyers, LLC. 

20 N. Clark Street, Suite 3100 

Chicago, IL 60602 

Ph: (312) 757-1880 

Fx: (312) 476-1362 

cchatman@communitylawyersgroup.com 

mwood@communitylawyersgroup.com 

Daniel Brown 

Main Street Attorney, LLC 

PO Box 247 

Chicago, IL 60690 

Ph: (773) 453-7410 

Fx: (773) 453-6420 

daniel@mainstreetattorney.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Lindsey A.L. Conley 

David Schultz 

Lindsey Conley 

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP 

151 North Franklin Street, Suite 2500 

Chicago, IL 60606 

Ph: 312-704-300 

dschultz@hinshawlaw.com 

lconley@hinshawlaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendants

Case: 1:20-cv-03455 Document #: 26 Filed: 02/10/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:94
3 

1032555\307501658.v1 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, Daniel Brown, an attorney, hereby certify that on February 10, 2021, I electronically 

filed the foregoing document using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such 

filing to all attorneys of record. 

By: /s/ Daniel Brown 

Daniel Brown 

Case: 1:20-cv-03455 Document #: 26 Filed: 02/10/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:95
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 282

Congratulating the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) on

the occasion of its 30th Anniversary.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 28, 1997

Mr. GILMAN (for himself, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. HAMILTON, Mr.

FALEOMAVAEGA, and Mr. BERMAN), submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Congratulating the Association of South East Asian Nations

(ASEAN) on the occasion of its 30th Anniversary.

Whereas 1997 marks the 30th anniversary of the Association

of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN);

Whereas the emphasis of ASEAN on cooperation and the

nonviolent settlement of disputes has helped to bring

peace between the nations of the region which for decades

had been characterized by instability and conflict;

Whereas the economies of the member nations of ASEAN

have experienced significant economic growth benefiting

the lives of many of their people;

Whereas ASEAN as a group is the 4th largest trading partner of the United States and constitutes a larger market
2

•HRES 282 IH

for United States exports than the People’s Republic of

China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong combined;

Whereas ASEAN has successfully fostered a sense of community among its member nations despite differing interests, including the establishment of the region’s only security forum, the Association of South East Asian Nations Regional Forum (ARF), and the Association of

South East Asian Nations Free Trade Area (AFTA);

Whereas ASEAN has played a pivotal role in international efforts of global and regional concern, including securing

the withdrawal of Vietnamese forces from Cambodia and

diplomatic efforts to foster a political settlement to the

civil war in Cambodia;

Whereas the United States relies on ASEAN as a partner in

fostering regional stability, enhancing prosperity, and

promoting peace; and

Whereas the 30th anniversary of the formation of ASEAN offers an opportunity for the United States and the nations

of ASEAN to renew their commitment to international

cooperation on issues of mutual interest and concern:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) congratulates the Association of South East

3 Asian Nations (ASEAN) and its member nations on

4 the occasion of its 30th anniversary;

5 (2) looks forward to a broadening and deepen6 ing of friendship and cooperation with ASEAN in

7 the years ahead for the benefit of the people of the

8 United States and the nations of ASEAN;
3

•HRES 282 IH

1 (3) encourages progress by ASEAN members

2 toward the further development of democracy, re3 spect for human rights, enhancement of the rule of

4 law, and the expansion of market economies; and

5 (4) recognizes the past achievements of ASEAN

6 and pledges its support to work closely with ASEAN

7 as both the United States and the nations of

8 ASEAN face current and future regional and global

9 challenges.

Æ
Case: 1:20-cv-00421 Document #: 72-1 Filed: 10/26/20 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:313
Case: 1:20-cv-00421 Document #: 72-1 Filed: 10/26/20 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:314
Case: 1:20-cv-00421 Document #: 72-1 Filed: 10/26/20 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:315
Case: 1:20-cv-00421 Document #: 72-1 Filed: 10/26/20 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:316
Case: 1:20-cv-00421 Document #: 72-1 Filed: 10/26/20 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:317
Case: 1:20-cv-00421 Document #: 72-1 Filed: 10/26/20 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:318
#### Washington Spradling, Ex'r, *v.*Henry Coyzens.

Trials — Inconsistent or Contradictory Defenses.

The defenses relied upon by the appellee are not necessarily inconsistent nor contradictory. The note may have been given without consideration, and still may have been paid or compromised to avoid litigation*.*

Trials — Instructions—Technical or Verbal Error — Preponderance.

Where the evidence preponderates in favor of the finding of the jury, the Court of Appeals will not reverse for a mere technical or verbal error.

APPEAL PROM JEFFERSON COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.

April 27, 1871.

*Harrison, for appellant.*

*Wards, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

The defenses relied upon by the appellee are not necessarily inconsistent nor contradictory. “The note may have been *given*without consideration, and still Coyzens, to avoid litigation may have paid it, or compromised with Spradling the claim growing out of the same.” We do not think either the note or the mortgage, which was not relied upon by appellant estopped the appellee from pleading want of consideration as to the note.

Whilst one of the instructions given at the instance of appellee is somewhat inartfully drawn, it was not calculated to mislead the jury, and in a case like this where the evidence preponderates in favor of the finding of the jury, this court will not reverse for a mere technical or verbal error which could not have operated injuriously to the party complaining.

Judgment affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

OUYEINC LTD.,

Plaintiff,

v.

NaturalRays-Official and et al., 

Defendants.

Case No. 20 cv 3591

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL UNDER RULE 41(a)(1)

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Ouyeinc Ltd.

(“Ouyeinc” or “Plaintiff”) hereby dismisses this action with prejudice pursuant to settlement as 

to the following Defendants:

Defendant Name Line No.

Ceavo 56

Easkep 58

Rainmberme 36

DATED August 7, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ James A. Karamanis

James A. Karamanis

Barney & Karamanis, LLP

Two Prudential Plaza

180 N. Stetson, Ste 3050

Chicago, IL 60601

Tel.: 312/553-5300

Attorney No. 6203479

James@bkchicagolaw.com

Case: 1:20-cv-03591 Document #: 41 Filed: 08/07/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:236
ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF Ouyeinc Ltd.

Case: 1:20-cv-03591 Document #: 41 Filed: 08/07/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:237
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SOVEREIGN
SPECIALTY CHEMICALS INC.'S SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,195
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,213
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     27,540
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,165
<PP&E>                                          66,990
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,153
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 253,443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,977
<BONDS>                                        149,026
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         22
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   253,443
<SALES>                                        186,803
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               186,803
<CGS>                                          128,197
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  128,197
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,626
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,825
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,155
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,276
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,879
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (4,828)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,949)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### March 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 

### 131947(73) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 131947 COA: 260313 Oakland CC: 2004-196540-FC TRACI BETH JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s December 28, 2006 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

p0319 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 26, 2007

Clerk
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00200

- CR

S IMEON B ONILLA

- R UBIO

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 158th District

Court

of Denton County ( F21

- 1926

- 158 )

October 3, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Birdwell

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

Justice Wade Birdwell
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Illustrate NASA\u2019s Journey to the Moon: SCaN Comic Activity","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"vf22pseotw\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/illustrate-nasas-journey-to-the-moon-scan-comic-activity\/\">Illustrate NASA\u2019s Journey to the Moon: SCaN Comic Activity<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/illustrate-nasas-journey-to-the-moon-scan-comic-activity\/embed\/#?secret=vf22pseotw\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Illustrate NASA\u2019s Journey to the Moon: SCaN Comic Activity” — NASA\" data-secret=\"vf22pseotw\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/image_11182021_lugreupdate.png?w=320","thumbnail_width":320,"thumbnail_height":180}
9908.

#### Purtell *v.*City of Atlanta.

Decided October 8, 1918.

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court—Judge Bell. April 12, 1918.

*Edgar A. Neely,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. L. Mayson, S. B. Hewlett,*contra.

Broyles, P. J.

1. While some illegal evidence was admitted over the objections of the defendant, a new trial of the case 'is not required, since the legal evidence introduced demanded a finding by the recorder (exercising by virtue of his office the functions of both judge and jury) th^t the defendant had been carrying on the business of a private detective, or detective agency, within the meaning of sections 2024 and 2027 of the Code of the City of Atlanta of 1910, which make it an offense punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, to engage in such a business without first obtaining a license as provided therein. And it was admitted by the defendant that he had not obtained such a license.

2. The judge'of the superior court did not err ino overruling the certiorari.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.*