alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Frederick LUCAS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. S.K. YOUNG, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 04-7139.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 2004.

Decided Dec. 21, 2004.

Frederick Lucas, Appellant pro se. Leah Ann Darron, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Frederick Lucas seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by the district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lucas has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Cybersecurity jobs are now in critical demand with industry partners. With the introduction of RMF, 

cybersecurity has caused impacts to programs and program managers are scrambling to find qualified 

cybersecurity professionals. It used to be common for industry to be paid better than gov't employees, 

but regarding cybersecurity, industry is consistently paying at least 30% more. I believe cybersecurity 

coded positions should have their pay assessed and upgraded to reflect this required critical skill. If this 

issue is not addressed, experienced government cybersecurity professionals are going to continue to 

leave their current position for much higher paying jobs in industry.

MARK TRUDEL, DAF, GSLC

Cybersecurity Technical Director, Special Programs Division, AFLCMC/HNJC

(781)225-0826
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 50

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that aviators who

meet the qualification standards of the Air Forces Escape and Evasion

Society should be granted recognition for meritorious service by the

Department of Defense.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 11, 1997

Mr. STEARNS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on National Security

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

aviators who meet the qualification standards of the Air

Forces Escape and Evasion Society should be granted

recognition for meritorious service by the Department

of Defense.

Whereas aviators in the Armed Forces have served the United States with great courage and distinction in every conflict during the 20th century;

Whereas thousands of aviators in the Armed Forces have

been shot down behind enemy lines while performing

their missions;
2

•HRES 50 IH

Whereas many of these aviators have overcome long odds and

great hardships to return to their units and resume their

service to the United States;

Whereas these aviators faced the added responsibility of

maintaining the secrecy of their escape and evasion methods in order to protect the lives of those who assisted

them and other aviators;

Whereas this maintenance of secrecy has prevented aviators

in the Armed Forces from being recognized for their

achievements;

Whereas the Air Forces Escape and Evasion Society has established strict qualifications for membership and has

served as a representative for aviators in the Armed

Forces; and

Whereas the Department of Defense has not provided adequate recognition to aviators in the Armed Forces who

have escaped or evaded capture behind enemy lines: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that aviators who meet the qualification

3 standards of the Air Forces Escape and Evasion Society

4 should be granted recognition for meritorious service by

5 the Department of Defense.

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Katherine Schauer","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/ksschaue\/","title":"Laser Communications: Empowering More Data Than Ever Before","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"u9qJ18TPlJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/technology\/laser-communications-empowering-more-data-than-ever-before\/\">Laser Communications: Empowering More Data Than Ever Before<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/technology\/laser-communications-empowering-more-data-than-ever-before\/embed\/#?secret=u9qJ18TPlJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Laser Communications: Empowering More Data Than Ever Before” — NASA\" data-secret=\"u9qJ18TPlJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/lcrd_beautyshots_sh4_final_v01.01044_print.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 381 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 15, 1998.
Whereas under the Extradition Treaty Between the United States of America and 
        the United Mexican States, Mexico refused to extradite murder suspect 
        and U.S. citizen Jose Luis Del Toro to the United States until the State 
        of Florida agreed not to exercise its right to seek capital punishment 
        in its criminal prosecution of him;
Whereas under the Extradition Treaty Mexico has refused to extradite other 
        suspects of capital crimes; and
Whereas the Extradition Treaty interferes with the justice system of the United 
        States and encourages criminals to flee to Mexico: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that the 
President should renegotiate the Extradition Treaty Between the United States of 
America and the United Mexican States, signed in Mexico City in 1978 (31 U.S.T. 
5059), so that the possibility of capital punishment will not interfere with the 
timely extradition of criminal suspects from Mexico to the United States.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 108 Agreed to House (ATH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 108

 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 9, 1997

 Mr. Mica submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and he is hereby, 
elected to the following standing committee of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on Government Reform and Oversight: Mr. Portman.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Fire Retardant Corp., a
Nevada  corporation  (the  "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March
31,  2004,  as  filed  with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Raoul  L.  Carroll, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May 20, 2004.

                                   By  /s/  Raoul L. Carroll
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Raoul L. Carroll,
                                      Chief Executive Officer of
                                      American Fire Retardant Corp.



                                       20
<PAGE>
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 1392

GHAFOUR ASEMANI

, a/k/a Billy G. Asemani,

Petitioner

,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General

,

Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted : September 8, 2022 Decided: September 12, 2022

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Bill y G. Asemani, Petitioner Pro Se. Daniel I. Smulow, Trial Attorney, Brandon Thomas Callahan, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding prec edent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1392 Doc: 22 Filed: 09/12/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:

Ghafour Asemani, a native and citizen of Iran

, petitions for review of an order of

the Immigration Judge (IJ) directing that he be removed to Iran. The Attorney General

moves to dismiss the petition for review for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the

petition was untimely filed. The IJ’s decision was issued July 16, 2004. Asemani had 30

days from this date to timely file a petition for review in this Court. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252(b)(1). This time period is “juri sdictional in nature and must be construed with strict

fidelity to [its] terms.” Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405 (1995)

. It is “not subject to

equitable tolling.” Id

.

The petition for review, dated March 30, 2022, and received by this court on

April 11, 2022, was filed after the expiration of the 30

- day deadline. We accordingly grant

the motion to dismiss the petition for review for lack of jurisdiction. We deny Asema ni’s

motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-1392 Doc: 22 Filed: 09/12/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Order entered May 14, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01228-CR

BRANDY MECHELLE HARRIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-00510-X

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On April 10, 2015, we denied appellant’s second motion to extend time to file her brief 

and ordered the trial court to make findings. On May 12, 2015, we received appellant’s brief, 

together with an extension motion. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we 

VACATE the April 10, 2015 order to the extent it requires findings.

We GRANT the May 12, 2015 motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed as of the date 

of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7864** 
T. TERELL BRYAN, a/k/a T. Terance Bryan, a/k/a Terrence Terell Bryan, a/k/a Terence Terell Bryan , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. WARDEN MCFADDEN , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Orangeburg
. Timothy M. Cain , District Judge. ( 5 :14

- cv - 03627

- TMC )

Submitted : March 1 7 , 2015 Decided: March 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Terence Terell Bryan, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
T. Terell Bryan seeks to appeal the distric t court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and d ismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition without prejudice . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2 253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this stan dard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When th e district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85
. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bryan has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability , deny Bryan’s motion for injunctive relief, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argume nt because the facts and legal contentions are3 adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

In the Interest of B.P. and M.P., children.

D.P.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and

GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM,

Appellees.

No. 2D23-2153

March 15, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Linda H. Babb, Judge.

Angela B. Wright, Tampa, for Appellant.

Bruce Bartlett, State Attorney of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, and Leslie M. 

Layne, Assistant State Attorney, Clearwater, for Appellant Department of 

Children and Families.

Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Amanda 

Victoria Glass, Senior Attorney, Tallahassee, for Appellant Guardian ad 

Litem Program.

PER CURIAM.

D.P., the father in this dependency proceeding, appeals from the 

order denying his motion for reunification. We treat this appeal as a 
2

petition for writ of certiorari, see D.P. v. Dep't of Child. & Fams., 367 So. 

3d 595, 597 (Fla. 2d DCA 2023), and dismiss. 

Petition dismissed.

LaROSE, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 11, 2020

No. 04-19-00737-CR & 04-19-00738-CR

Aidan VITELA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5942 & 6023

Honorable Kirsten Cohoon, Judge Presiding

ORDER

After we granted court reporter Kelly Grossman’s first motion for extension of time to 

file the reporter’s record, we set the record due on March 2, 2020. See TEX. R. APP. R. 35.3(c). 

After the extended due date, the court reporter filed a second request for an extension of time to 

file the record until April 20, 2020.

The reporter’s request is GRANTED. The reporter’s record is due on April 20, 2020. 

See id. (limiting any extension in an ordinary appeal to thirty days); id. R. 2. 

If the court reporter is unable to file the completed record by April 20, 2020, any further 

request for additional time to file the record must be accompanied by a signed, written status 

report. 

The report must describe the transcript by day with the date, description, page counts, and 

remarks for each day. The page counts must include the total number of pages, the number of 

pages edited, proofread, and formatted into the required electronic form (including bookmarks). 

The report may describe any unusual aspects of the record. The report must describe any 

problems the court reporter reasonably believes may delay the completion of the record beyond 

the requested date. 

The preferred form for the status report, with an accompanying example, is attached. 
_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of March, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of B&G  Foods,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 29, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David
L.  Wenner,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ David L. Wenner
-----------------------
David L. Wenner
Chief Executive Officer
April 25, 2003
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 46 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                   House Calendar No. 2
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 46

                           [Report No. 105-3]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 581) to amend Public Law 
 104-208 to provide that the President may make funds appropriated for 
population planning and other population assistance available on March 
1, 1997, subject to restrictions on assistance to foreign organizations 
              that perform or actively promote abortions.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 1997

     Mr. Goss, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 581) to amend Public Law 
 104-208 to provide that the President may make funds appropriated for 
population planning and other population assistance available on March 
1, 1997, subject to restrictions on assistance to foreign organizations 
              that perform or actively promote abortions.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution, it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 581) to amend Public Law 
104-208 to provide that the President may make funds appropriated for 
population planning and other population assistance available on March 
1, 1997, subject to restrictions on assistance to foreign organizations 
that perform or actively promote abortions. The bill shall be debatable 
for one hour equally divided and controlled by Representative Smith of 
New Jersey or his designee and a Member opposed to the bill. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final 
passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit.
                                     





                                                   House Calendar No. 2

105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. RES. 46

                           [Report No. 105-3]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 581) to amend Public Law 
 104-208 to provide that the President may make funds appropriated for 
population planning and other population assistance available on March 
1, 1997, subject to restrictions on assistance to foreign organizations 
              that perform or actively promote abortions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 11, 1997

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
United States District Court

Southern District of Texas

ENTERED

May 29, 2020

David J. Bradley, Clerk

Case: 1:20-cv-03224 Document #: 14 Filed: 05/29/20 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:106
Case: 1:20-cv-03224 Document #: 14 Filed: 05/29/20 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:107
Case: 1:20-cv-03224 Document #: 14 Filed: 05/29/20 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:108
Case: 1:20-cv-03224 Document #: 14 Filed: 05/29/20 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:109
Case: 1:20-cv-03224 Document #: 14 Filed: 05/29/20 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:110