alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### NUMBER 13 - 14 - 00 528 - CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE STATE FARM LLOYDS , RICHARD FREYMANN, AND

CLIFF COPPEDGE

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam 1
Relator s , State Farm Lloyds , Richard Freymann, and Cliff Coppedge, have filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that this Court direct respondent, the Honorable Rose Guerra Reyna, Presiding Judge of the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, to withdraw her order denying relators ’ verified plea in abatement and to enter an order abating the suit for damages brought agai nst relator s by the real part ies in i nterest, Maribel Gu zman and David Guzman , u ntil sixty days after they provide relator s with a

1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(d) ( “ When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so. ” ); T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).2

notice letter for t he i r claim stating the specific, separate amounts for the claimed damages and attorney’s fees. See T EX

. I NS

. C ODE A NN . § 541.154 (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C .S.) (“Prior Notice of Action”); id. § 541.155 (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.) (“Abatement”); T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.1 (“Commencement” of Original Proceedings). In addition, relator s request that this Court issue immediate temporary relief staying
respon dent’s order denying the plea in abatement. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.10 (“Temporary Relief”). T he Court, having examined and fully considered th e petition for writ of mandamus and the applicable law, is of the opinion that th e petition for writ of mandamus should be denied for the reasons expressed in our opinion in In re State Farm Lloyds, Richard Freymann, and Nathan Burris , No . 13

- 14

- 00347

- CV, 2014 WL 4243701 , at ** 4

– 9 (Tex. App.

— Corpus Christi Aug. 27, 2014, orig. proceedi ng) (mem. op ). Accordingly, the Court DENIES the petit ion for writ of mandamus and request for immediate temporary relief

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 52.8( d ).

PER CURIAM D elivered and filed the 19t h day of September, 2014.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

GLOBAL MERCHANDISING SERVICES LTD., 

Plaintiff,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”,

Defendants.

Civil Action No.: 1:20-cv-03726

Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cummings

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby files this Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal, without prejudice, as to the following Defendant(s) identified on Schedule A of the 

Complaint:

NO. DEFENDANT

254 binnazhenzhi

296 Amknu

143 Goodlines

144 Melontwo

207 amoywatches

DATED: August 24, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt (Bar No. 6207971)

Keith Vogt, Ltd.

111 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1700

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Telephone: 312-675-6079

E-mail: keith@vogtip.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case: 1:20-cv-03726 Document #: 33 Filed: 08/24/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:4304
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document was electronically filed on August 24, 2020 with the Clerk of the Court using the 

CM/ECF system, which will automatically send an email notification of such filing to all registered 

attorneys of record.

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt

Case: 1:20-cv-03726 Document #: 33 Filed: 08/24/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:4305
Order entered October 3, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00768-CV

IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF RICHARD W. THOMPSON, JR., 

AN ALLEGED INCAPACITATED PERSON

On Appeal from the Collin County Probate

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. GA1-0261-2018

ORDER

By order dated September 27, 2022, we denied appellant’s “Emergency 

Motion to Stay Pending Consideration of Motion to Transfer.” Before the Court is 

appellant’s September 29, 2022 motion to clarify that order and specify whether 

we denied her motion to stay or to transfer. We GRANT the motion. We DENY

appellant’s motion to stay and note that appellant has not filed a motion to transfer 

in this appeal.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 99.1





STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND THE CHIEF


FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
KNOLOGY BROADBAND, INC.


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350





Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Knology Broadband, Inc. (the Company) that this amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March
31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this Amended Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this
Amended Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:    October 29, 2002


/s/  RODGER L. JOHNSONRodger L. Johnson President and
Chief Executive Officer





Dated:    October 29, 2002





/s/  ROBERT K. MILLSRobert K. Mills Chief Financial
Officer
H. Res. 325

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 13 (legislative day, November 12), 1997.

Resolved, That the following Member be, and he is hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the House

of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES:

Mr. Fossella of New York.

COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Mr. Fossella of New York.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EFC Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), I, Barrett J. O'Connor, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | By:                                                         |  | /s/ Barrett J. O'Connor
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
| |  |                                                             |  |                        
| |  | Barrett J. O'Connor
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002

---

QuickLinks
##### 



Citizens Effingham Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
 Exhibit 32.1
  (1)
    
    To the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
the Company.
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   | /s/                Jean Dagenais                                           |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | Jean                    DagenaisChief                    Financial Officer |

----
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Elder, Beales and Retired Judge Hodges∗

RICHARD EDWIN BROWN 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION**

v. Record No. 1324-09-4 PER CURIAM 

OCTOBER 6, 2009 

KOONS FORD BODY SHOP AND 

 PENN NATIONAL SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Julie H. Heiden; Koonz, McKenney, Johnson, DePaolis & 

Lightfoot, on brief), for appellant. 

 (Bryan M. Kirchner; Angela F. Gibbs; Midkiff, Muncie & Ross, 

P.C., on brief), for appellees. 

 Richard E. Brown appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding 

that his injury did not arise out of his employment. We have reviewed the record and the 

commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Brown v. Koons Ford Body Shop, 

VWC File No. 238-14-03 (June 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

Affirmed.

 ∗

 Retired Judge William H. Hodges considered this case by designation pursuant to Code 

§ 17.1-400(D). 

** Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
#### Armin Celido ESCOBAR CALDERON, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

Nos. 03-73965, [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 6, 2004.*

Decided Dec. 8, 2004.

Charles E. Nichol, Esq., Law Office of Charles E. Nichol, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

*545Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Virginia Lum, Anthony W. Norwood, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Armin Celido Escobar Calderon, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s (IJ) order denying his claims for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for substantial evidence, *Melkonian v. Ashcroft,*320 F.3d 1061, 1065 (9th Cir.2003), we deny the petition for review.

Escobar Calderon contends that the IJ erred by failing to find him eligible for asylum and withholding of removal based on imputed political opinion, where he and his father served in the civil defense. Substantial evidence, however, supports the IJ’s decision because Escobar Calderon failed to demonstrate that his two encounters with guerrillas in Guatemala were on account of imputed political opinion or any other statutorily protected ground. *See Melkonian,*320 F.3d at 1064 (requiring evidence that applicant was targeted for conscription based on an enumerated ground).

Further, substantial evidence supports the IJ’s finding that Escobar Calderon failed to establish a well-founded fear of persecution motivated by his refusal to join the guerrillas. *See Sangha v. INS,*103 F.3d 1482, 1487 (9th Cir.1997).

Finally, the fact that Escobar Calderon’s children and brother who also served in the civil patrol have remained in Guatemala without incident undermines the objectivity of Escobar Calderon’s fear of persecution. *See Aruta v. INS,*80 F.3d 1389, 1395 (9th Cir.1996) (safety of similarly situated family relevant to support BIA’s decision).

Because Escobar Calderon failed to establish asylum eligibility, he necessarily faded to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Alvarez-Santos v. INS,*332 F.3d 1245, 1255 (9th Cir.2003).

Pursuant to *Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741, 745-46 (9th Cir.2004), Escobar Calderon’s motion for stay of removal included a timely request for stay of voluntary departure. Because the stay of removal was continued based on the government’s filing of a notice of non-opposition, the voluntary departure period was also stayed, nunc pro tunc, to the filing of the motion for stay of removal and this stay will expire upon issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2005 (the Report), I, Joseph Lloyd McAdams, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:

/s/    JOSEPH LLOYD
MCADAMSJoseph Lloyd McAdams Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer November 9, 2005




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Luis SERRANO-ANETI, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-50543.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Dec. 29, 2004.

Joseph H. Gay Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jaime E. Gandara, El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Jose Luis Serrano-Aneti has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Serrano-Aneti has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Sha−Poppin Gourmet Popcorn LLC

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02523

Honorable Joan B. Gottschall

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, August 21, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Any response to

plaintiff's motion to relate cases [43] is due on or before 8/21/2020 after which date the

motion will be taken under advisement. Mailed notice(mjc, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02523 Document #: 46 Filed: 08/21/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:249
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 419 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                           May 6, 1998.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 1872) to amend the Communications Satellite Act of 1962 to promote 
competition and privatization in satellite communications, and for other 
purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate 
shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Commerce. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under 
the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for 
the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature 
of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Commerce now printed in the 
bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered 
as read. No amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute 
shall be in order unless printed in the portion of the Congressional Record 
designated for that purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII. Printed amendments shall 
be considered as read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) 
postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole 
a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes 
the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows 
another electronic vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum 
time for electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 
minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 
Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as 
may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on any 
amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee 
amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Cogent, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal yearended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ming Hsieh, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. That the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

This certification has not been, andshall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

Date: April 26, 2007
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

Bureau of Consumer Financial Case No. 1:20-cv-04176 

Protection, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Judge Franklin V. Valderrama 

Magistrate Judge Heather K. McShain 

Townstone Financial, Inc., 

Defendant. 

JOINT MOTION REQUESTING ENTRY 

OF STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER 

Plaintiff Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection and Defendant Townstone Financial, 

Inc., have agreed to entry of the attached proposed Stipulated Final Judgment and Order (Exhibit 

A). The Parties have separately stipulated to the dismissal of Defendant Barry Sturner. If entered 

by the Court, the proposed Stipulated Final Judgment and Order would settle and resolve all 

remaining matters in dispute arising from the conduct alleged in the Amended Complaint 

without further proceedings. 

The parties respectfully request that the Court approve and enter the Stipulated Final 

Judgment and Order attached as Exhibit A. 

Case: 1:20-cv-04176 Document #: 135 Filed: 11/01/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:846
- 2 -

Dated: November 1, 2024

Respectfully submitted, 

CONSUMER FINANCIAL 

PROTECTION BUREAU 

/s/ Jacob A. Schunk 

JACOB A. SCHUNK (IA AT001908) 

jacob.schunk@cfpb.gov 

Tele: (202) 718-0394 

GREGORY W. JONES 

(IL ARDC #6313157) 

gregory.jones@cfpb.gov 

MARY OLSON (IL ARDC # 629733) 

mary.olson@cfpb.gov 

230 S. Dearborn St. 

Suite 1590 

Chicago, IL 60604 

and 

1700 G Street NW 

Washington, DC 20552 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

TOWNSTONE FINANCIAL, INC.

/s/ Steven M. Simpson 

STEVEN M. SIMPSON 

DC Bar No. 462553 

ASHLEY TORKELSON LEVINE 

AZ Bar No. 032544 

Pacific Legal Foundation 

3100 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 610 

Arlington, VA, 22201 

Tel: (202) 888-6881 

SSimpson@pacificlegal.org 

ALevine@pacificlegal.org 

OLIVER DUNFORD 

FL Bar No. 017991 

Pacific Legal Foundation 

4440 PGA Boulevard, Suite 307 

Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 

Tel: (916) 503-9060 

ODunford@pacificlegal.org 

SEAN P. BURKE 

Mattingly Burke Cohen & Biederman 

LLP 155 E. Market St. Suite 400 

Indianapolis, IN 46204 

MARX DAVID STERBCOW 

The Sterbcow Law Group LLC 

824 Elmwood Park Boulevard, Suite 205 

New Orleans, LA 70123 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Case: 1:20-cv-04176 Document #: 135 Filed: 11/01/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:847
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 

The undersigned hereby certifies that on November 1, 2024, I electronically filed the 

foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court via the CM/ECF system, which will cause a copy 

to be served upon counsel of record. 

 

 

/s/ Jacob A. Schunk 

JACOB A. SCHUNK 

Case: 1:20-cv-04176 Document #: 135 Filed: 11/01/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:848