alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                  FORM 10-Q/A3



X     Quarterly  Report  Pursuant  to  Section  13 or  15(d)  of the  Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998

                                       OR

      Transition  Report  Pursuant  to  Section  13 or 15(d)  of the  Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from ____________ to
      _________________

                          Commission File No: 00-113959

                                CPS SYSTEMS, INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                TEXAS                                   75-1607857
    (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF         (I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.)
    INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)

                            3400 CARLISLE, SUITE 500
                               DALLAS, TEXAS 75204
                                 (214) 855-5277

    (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code,
                  of Registrant's principal executive offices)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the  preceding 12 months (or for such  shorter  period that the  registrant  was
required  to file  such  reports),  and  (2) has  been  subject  to such  filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

                                          Yes                   No       X
                                                   --------              -------

Indicate the number of shares  outstanding  of each of the  issuer's  classes of
common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

                  CLASS                     OUTSTANDING AS OF  MAY 07, 1998
                  -----                     ---------------------------------
             Common stock
         Par value $.01 per share                      6,732,502



                                        1
<PAGE>
Pursuant to the  requirements  of the  Securities  and Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Date:  November 11, 1998

                                /s/ Paul E. Kana
                                -----------------------------------------------
                                Paul E. Kana
                                CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,
                                CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                AND DIRECTOR (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER)


                                /s/ Kevin L. Figge
                                -----------------------------------------------
                                Kevin L. Figge
                                VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                (PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER)
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ares Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), R. Kipp deVeer, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Penni F. Roll, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge:





1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: February 13, 2018/s/ R. KIPP DEVEERR. Kipp deVeerChief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)Date: February 13, 2018/s/ PENNI F. ROLLPenni F. RollChief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Ares Capital Corporation and will be retained by Ares Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
9863.

#### Rachels *v.*The State.

Decided October 14, 1918.

Accusation of larceny; from city court of Macon—Judge G-uerry. May 23, 1918.

*8. B. Hunter,*for plaintiff in error. *Will Gunn, solicitor,*contra.

Bloodwoeth, *J.*

1- There is no merit in the grounds of the motion for

new trial based on alleged newly discovered evidence. They show that the defendant knew of this evidence before the trial, and that there was a 'lack of diligence on his part to procure the same. *Burgess*v. *State,*93 *Ga.*304 (20 S. E. 331); *Watkins*v. *State,*18 *Ga. App.*60 (3), 61 (88 S. E. 1000).

2. There was sufficient evidence to support the finding of guilty by the trial judge, who presided without a jury.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.*
Exhibit 32.1
 
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ares Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), R. Kipp deVeer, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Penni F. Roll, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge:
 
 1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: February 12, 2020/s/ R. KIPP DEVEERR. Kipp deVeerChief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)Date: February 12, 2020/s/ PENNI F. ROLLPenni F. RollChief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Ares Capital Corporation and will be retained by Ares Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 28 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 28

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that programs 
based upon the premise that ``Ebonics'' is a legitimate language should 
                       not receive Federal funds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

  Mr. King of New York submitted the following resolution; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that programs 
based upon the premise that ``Ebonics'' is a legitimate language should 
                       not receive Federal funds.

Whereas ``Ebonics'' is not a legitimate language: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
no Federal funds should be used to pay for or support any program that 
is based upon the premise that ``Ebonics'' is a legitimate language.
                                 <all>
```
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09

- 22

- 00246

- CR

__________________ JACOB EDWARD PRESLEY , Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 435th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 19

- 08

- 11854

- CR

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION
On September 26 , 202 2 , we notified the parties that th is appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained why he needed additional time for filing the record. The appe llant did not file a response. It appears that the appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for want of pros ecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).2 APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on Novem ber 29 , 2022 Opinion Delivered November 30, 2022 Do Not Publish Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-2644

___________________________

Nadin Khoury

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

v.

William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States

lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent

 ____________

Petition for Review of an Order of the

 Board of Immigration Appeals

 ____________

 Submitted: July 1, 2019

Filed: July 3, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before KELLY, BOWMAN, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Nadin Khoury, a citizen of Liberia, petitions for review of an order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen his removal

proceedings. After careful consideration of the petition, we find no basis for reversal.
The petition is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
##### 



EXHIBIT (31.2)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13A-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of PeopleSupport, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control which could adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
controls.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 160 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          June 5, 1997.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the concurrent resolution (H. Con. 
Res. 84) establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government 
for fiscal year 1998 and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal 
years 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002. All points of order against the conference 
report and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be 
considered as read. The conference report shall be debatable for one hour 
equally divided and controlled by the Chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on the Budget.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

ROBERT ANDREW FFRENCH,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”,

Defendants.

Civil Action No.: 1:20-cv-03178

Judge Matthew F. Kennelly

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cummings

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby files this Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal, without prejudice, as to the following Defendant(s) identified on Schedule A of the 

Complaint:

NO. DEFENDANT

56 7hk8918

59 bigvip8018

63 conceitzhang

65 dragonball-fourth

66 e-suggestion

67 electron365

69 flowersbud

70 flowersgrass

78 hftndbkn-3

80 infinite.force22

81 jewelry-base

82 jfdxfybq-0

83 kzyu_17

86 little.apple2014

89 mrzo_33

93 pfkn-59

94 picturesque-landscape

95 ppptyiad_6

98 rasgswkgflgq45

99 rocm84

100 rookie-xu

101 shalo-3238

Case: 1:20-cv-03178 Document #: 59 Filed: 09/14/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:780
105 trs-seller2012

107 vesny89735-6

109 whitedaisy666

110 wonderfulbuying36588

114 zhifei-82

2 Huiyang Kangde Silicone Rubber Ware Co., Ltd.

DATED: September 14, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt (Bar No. 6207971)

Keith Vogt, Ltd.

111 West Jackson Boulevard, Suite 1700

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Telephone: 312-675-6079

E-mail: keith@vogtip.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case: 1:20-cv-03178 Document #: 59 Filed: 09/14/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:781
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 

document was electronically filed on September 14, 2020 with the Clerk of the Court using the 

CM/ECF system, which will automatically send an email notification of such filing to all registered 

attorneys of record.

/s/ Keith A. Vogt

Keith A. Vogt

Case: 1:20-cv-03178 Document #: 59 Filed: 09/14/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:782
#### W. H. Graves *v.*Singleton Gibson.

Evidence — Preponderance—No Legal Question Involved — Verdict Will be Upheld.

Where no legal question is involved and there is not a preponderance of evidence against the verdict, the court of appeals are not authorized to reverse the case.

APPEAL PROM SHELBY CIRCUIT COURT.

June 24, 1871.

*Wheat, Middleton, for appellant.*

*Caldwell & Harwood, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

Appellant was the drawer, one Morton, the acceptor, and appellee was the endorser of a bill of exchange for near one thousand dollars, which was sold to the People’s Bank of Louisville.

On the 18th day of December, 1867, four hundred dollars was paid on said bill, and on the 22d of December, 1869, two hundred and eighty-seven and fifty one-hundredths dollars were paid on it by appellee. After that the bank sued the parties to the bill and recovered judgment for the amount remaining unpaid. Appellee satisfied the judgment and took an assignment of it to himself. And after an official return of nulla bona brought this bill for a discovery of assets against appellant, Morton being insolvent.

Appellant by his answer raises two issues of fact. 1st. That he drew the bill for the accommodation of Morton and appellee, he having received one-half the money raised by the sale of the bill. 2d. That he paid the $400 credited on the bill of date December 18, 1867.

Both these questions the court below decided against appellant and he has appealed. After a careful examination of the evidence we are unable to say that the court below erred in its conclusions. If the judgment is not sustained by a preponderance of the evidence, we feel assured that there is not a preponderance against it, and in such case where no legal question is involved we are not authorized to reverse. Wherefore the judgment must be affirmed.
#### John Fentress *v.*Jas. B. Holmes.

Wills — Construction—Devisee Must Accept Will as an Entirety.

The devisees could not claim the estate devised to them in the . balance of the tract and deny the right of the testator to dispose of *22the rest and thereby defeat the interests therein intended to be secured to their children.

APPEAL FROM GRAYSON CIRCUIT COURT.

February 23, 1872.

*Wintersmith, Conklin, for appellant.*

*Cofer, for appellee.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Lindsay:

The devise to Dulcena B. and' Josephine B. Tunstall and their children vested the first takers with life estates in the tract of land devised1 with remainder over to such children as might thereafter be born to them.

At the time of the death of Josephine, she had but one child, the present appellee. The title to one-half of the tract of land passed to him upon' his mother’s death, and' his right of entry at once accrued.

We are not satisfied from the evidence that the mother of appellee ever accepted the deed to sixty acres of the land, made and executed by her father several years before his death.

She seems to 'have been aware that such deed1 had been executed 'but there is no single fact proved tending to show that she ever claimed any right under it, or in any way failed to recognize her father’s title. Besides this, she accepted the estate devised to her, with the conditions imposed upon it. The testator claimed the right to dispose of the entire tract, and then doubtless recognized his right to convey such title as they could have taken under the deed to the 60 acres, with life estates, with remainder to their children. They could not claim the estates devised to them in the balance of 'the tract, and deny the right of the testator to dispose of the 60 acres in question, and thereby defeat the interests therein intended to be secured to their children.

We do not deem it necessary to discuss the other questions raised in the arguments presented by counsel, as the judgment of the circuit court must necessarily be affirmed for.the reasons already given.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 208 Agreed to House (ATH)]

  1st Session
H. RES. 208

  Designating minority membership on certain committees of the House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 31, 1997

 Mr. Fazio of California submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating minority membership on certain committees of the House.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and that they are 
hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on Banking and Financial Services: Mr. Weygand.
    Committee on National Security: Ms. McKinney.
                                 <all>
```
SCWC-16-0000421
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. MICHELLE HELEN CASTILLON, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-16-0000421; CASE NO. 3DTC-15-042273)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Reck tenwald, C.J., Nak ayama, Mc Kenna, Po llack, an d Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Michelle Helen Castillon’s application for writ of certiorari filed on October 11, 2017, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, November 29, 2017. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-16-0000421 29-NOV-2017 04:29 PM
9647.

#### Jennings *v.*The State.

Decided July 30, 1918.

Broyles, P. J.

1. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, a special ground of a motion for a new trial must be complete within itself. When, for a proper understanding of it, it is necessary to refer to another special ground of the motion, or to the record, it will not be considered. This ruling disposes of the special grounds of .the motion for a new trial.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.*

*551Indictment for assault with intent to murder; from Fulton superior court—Judge Hill. March 2, 1918.

*Tillou Von*Nunes, for plaintiff in error.

*John A. Boylcin, solicitor-general, B. A. Stephens,*contra.