alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 67 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 67

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a credit or refund 
   of motor fuel excise taxes on fuel used by the motor of a highway 
  vehicle to operate certain power takeoff equipment on such vehicle.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 1997

  Mr. Herger introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a credit or refund 
   of motor fuel excise taxes on fuel used by the motor of a highway 
  vehicle to operate certain power takeoff equipment on such vehicle.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF FUEL USED TO OPERATE CERTAIN POWER TAKEOFF 
              EQUIPMENT.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 6421(e) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (defining off-highway business use) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Treatment of fuel used to operate power 
                takeoff equipment.--The term `off-highway business use' 
                includes fuel used by the motor which propels the 
                highway vehicle while such motor is operating an 
                accessory unit to power special equipment, but only to 
                the extent the taxpayer substantiates by adequate 
                records or by sufficient evidence corroborating the 
                taxpayer's own statement the amount of fuel use 
                allocable to the operation of such equipment.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 66759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26578]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #14171 and #14172]


Kentucky Disaster #KY-00053

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the Commonwealth of Kentucky dated 10/30/2014.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides.
    Incident Period: 08/18/2014 through 08/23/2014.

DATES: Effective Date: 10/30/2014.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/29/2014.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/30/2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Floyd.
Contiguous Counties: Kentucky: Johnson, Knott, Magoffin, Martin, Pike.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      4.125
  Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      2.063
  Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      6.000
  Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      4.000
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.625
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.625
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit      4.000
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.625
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14171 B 
and for economic injury is 14172 0.
    The Commonwealth which received an EIDL Declaration # is Kentucky

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: October 30, 2014.
Maria Contreras-Sweet,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014-26578 Filed 11-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Prinzo & Associates, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff

vs.

BMO Harris Bank, N.A, et al.

Defendant

Case #: 20-cv-3256

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes and says: That s(he) is now and at all the times herein mentioned was a

citizen of the United States, over the age of 18, not a party to nor interested in the above entitled action, is competent to be witness

therein, and that I served copies of the:

Complaint, Summons, Summons

 DESCRIPTION: Race: Hispanic Sex: Male Age: 27

Height: 5'9'' Weight: 160 Hair: Black Glasses: No

PARTY SERVED:

PERSON SERVED:

METHOD OF SERVICE:

BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A.

ANGEL MARTINEZ, TELLER

Corporate - By leaving copies with the person identified above who stated they were authorized

to accept service.

DATE & TIME OF DELIVERY:

ADDRESS, CITY AND STATE:

6/10/2020 at 1:15 PM

111 W MONROE STREET, CHICAGO, IL 60603

Judicial Attorney Services, Inc.

2100 Manchester Rd., Ste 505

Wheaton, IL 60187

(630) 221-9007

Signature:

Robert D Fairbanks

Registration No: 117-001119

I declare under penalties of perjury that the information contained

herein is true and correct. Executed on 6/11/2020.

CLIENT: One Legal LLC

FILE #: 14771642

Job #: 438315

Case: 1:20-cv-03256 Document #: 9 Filed: 06/16/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:40
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 3- 16 10

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Ju Qin W u
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Peti ti on er

v.
Eric H. Hold er, J r., Att or ne y Gene ral of Un it ed Sta te s
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Resp on de nt

__ __ __ __ __ __ Pet it io n fo r Rev ie w of a n Ord er o f th e Bo ard of I m

m ig rat io n Ap pe al s

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Jan ua ry

3, 2 01 4 Fil ed : J an ua ry

9, 2 01 4 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re MUR PHY, SMITH, an d S HEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Ju Qui n Wu pe ti ti on s fo r rev ie w of a Feb ru ary 20 13 or de r of th e Bo ard of Im m ig rat io n App eal s (BIA), whi ch up he ld an im m ig rat io n ju d g e ’s Mar ch 20 11

a d v e r se de ci si on , whi ch fo ll owe d a rem an d fro m th e Seco nd Ci rcu it Co ur t o fApp eal s. Afte r car e f ul co ns id erat io n of th e pe ti ti on , we fin d no ba si s fo r rev ers al

. 1 W e co nc lu de th at su bs ta nt ia l ev id en ce su pp or te d th e BIA’s d e t erm in at io n th at W u fai le d to es ta bl is h a cl ear pr ob ab il it y of pe rs ecu ti on in Ch in a, ev en as su m in g Wu was cred ib l e

. S e e Wijo no v. Gon zal es , 43 9 F.3 d 86 8, 87 2 (8 th Ci r. 20 06 ) (ap pl ic an t

se ek in g wit hh ol di ng of rem ov al ha s bu rd en to sh ow cl ear pr ob ab il it y of pe rs ecu ti on ; BIA de ci si on de nyin g wit hh ol di ng of re m ova l is re viewed un de r su bs ta nt ia l-e vi de nc e st an da rd ). W e al so co nc lu de th at Wu’s du e pr oc es s rig ht s were no t vi ol at ed whe n th e im m ig rat io n jud ge de ni ed hi s r e q ue st fo r a co nt in ua nc e at th e fin al he ari ng , se e Sal ke ld v. Gon zal es , 42 0 F.3 d 80 4, 80 9- 10 (8 th Ci r. 20 05 ), an d th at th e BIA di d no t ab us e it s di sc ret io n in de nyin g W u’s m ot io n to reo pe n th e as y lu m pr oc eed in gs , cf. Li Y u n Li n v. Mu ka se y , 52 6 F.3 d 11 64 , 11 65 -6 6 (8 th Ci r. 20 08 ) (p er cu ri a m). Acco rd in gl y , th e p et it io n fo r rev ie w is de ni ed . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

Ai Fan g Xie v. Gon zal e s , 20 8 Fed

. App x. 51 (2 d Ci r. 20 06 ) (u np ub li sh ed 1
or de r).
-2

-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET OF KNOLOGY AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE RELATED COMBINED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000. THIS INFORMATION IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,237,966
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,097,976
<ALLOWANCES>                                   728,255
<INVENTORY>                                 23,055,466
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,790,138
<PP&E>                                     350,025,685
<DEPRECIATION>                              54,698,108
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             357,228,061
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       88,312,845
<BONDS>                                    338,312,481
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        499
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                 (88,501,736)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               357,228,061
<SALES>                                     27,873,525
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,932,618
<CGS>                                       12,619,316
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               58,533,448
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,779,977
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          18,939,748
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (49,380,807)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,755,666
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (47,625,141)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (47,625,141)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
H. Res. 167

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 20, 1997.

Resolved,

SECTION 1. APPLICATION.

This resolution shall apply to the investigation by the

Committee on Government Reform and Oversight of political

fundraising improprieties and possible violations of law.

SEC. 2. HANDLING OF INFORMATION.

Information obtained under the authority of this resolution shall be—

(1) considered as taken by the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight in the District of Columbia, as well as at the location actually taken; and

(2) considered as taken in executive session.

SEC. 3. DEPOSITIONS AND INTERROGATORIES.

The chairman of the Committee on Government Reform

and Oversight, after consultation with the ranking minority

member of the committee, may—
2

•HRES 167 EH

(1) order the taking of depositions or interrogatories anywhere within the United States, under oath

and pursuant to notice or subpoena; and

(2) designate a member of the committee or an attorney on the staff of the committee to conduct any such

proceeding.

SEC. 4. INTERNATIONAL AUTHORITIES.

The chairman of the Committee on Government Reform

and Oversight, after consultation with the ranking minority

member of the committee, may—

(1) order the taking of depositions and other testimony under oath anywhere outside the United States;

and

(2) make application for issuance of letters rogatory, and request, through appropriate channels, other

means of international assistance, as appropriate.

Attest:

Clerk.
ILND 450 (Rev. 10/13) Judgment in a Civil Action

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Ambassador Animal Hospital, Ltd., individually 

and as the representative of a class of similarly 

situated persons,

Plaintiff,

v.

Elanco Animal Health Incorporated

and Eli Lilly and Company ,

Defendants.

Case No. 20-cv-02886

Judge Mary M. Rowland 

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Judgment is hereby entered (check appropriate box):

in favor of plaintiff(s)

and against defendant(s)

in the amount of $ ,

which includes pre–judgment interest. 

does not include pre–judgment interest.

Post-judgment interest accrues on that amount at the rate provided by law from the date of this judgment. 

Plaintiff(s) shall recover costs from defendant(s).

in favor of defendant(s) 

and against plaintiff(s)

.

Defendant(s) shall recover costs from plaintiff(s).

other: Judgment of dismissal with prejudice on Count I and judgment of dismissal without 

prejudice on Count II.

This action was (check one):

tried by a jury with Judge Mary M. Rowland presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. 

tried by Judge Mary M. Rowland without a jury and the above decision was reached. 

decided by Judge Mary M. Rowland on a motion to dismiss.

Date: 2/22/2022 Thomas G. Bruton, Clerk of Court

Dawn A. Moreno, Deputy Clerk

Case: 1:20-cv-02886 Document #: 65 Filed: 02/22/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                        0
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                           690,715
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                             106,627
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        797,342
<PP&E>                                  235,344
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        1,326,209
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 2,028,859
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  2,351
<OTHER-SE>                           (1,044,951)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          1,326,209
<SALES>                                 881,811
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        881,811
<CGS>                                   432,051
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           432,051
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        365,425
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     (135,919)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (135,919)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            (51,584)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.02)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
        32.1
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350**
 **ADOPTED
        PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF
        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the Report of Physical Property Holdings Inc. (the "Company")
        on
        Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ngai Keung Luk,
        Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
        18
        U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 
 **/s/
        Ngai Keung Luk**
 Ngai
        Keung Luk
 Chairman
        and Chief Executive Officer
 
 August
        14, 2007
9465.

#### Sulter *v.*The State.

Decided April 2, 1918.

Accusation of misdemeanor; from city court of Savannah— Judge Rourke. November 17, 1917.

*Robert L. Golding,*for plaintiff in error.

*Walter G. Eartridge, solicitor-general,*contra.

Broyles, P. J.

1. The grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, not being specifically argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, are deemed abandoned. The general statement in the brief, that “the recitals of fact and statement of error in the motion and amended motion for a new trial clearly state the issues in the case and the same is respectfully submitted to the court,” is not sufficient to change the rule. *Youmans*v. *Moore,*11 *Ga. App.*66 (74 S. E. 710); *Muse*v. *Hall,*18 *Ga. App.*651 (90 S. E. 222); *James*v. *Boyett,*19 *Ga. App.*157 (91 S. E. 219).

2.' The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodioorth and Harwell, JJ., concur.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"X-57 Mini Poster","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8GhcMFAnAN\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/x-57-mini-poster\/\">X-57 Mini Poster<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/x-57-mini-poster\/embed\/#?secret=8GhcMFAnAN\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“X-57 Mini Poster” — NASA\" data-secret=\"8GhcMFAnAN\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/edu_webinar_aeronaut-x_propulsion_thrust_and_the_x-57_maxwell.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":461}
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

M EMORANDUM O RDER

Appellate case name: W estern International Gas & Cylin ders, Inc. v. H&H Land, L.P.

Appellate case number: 01

- 2 1

- 00 514

- CV

Trial court case number: 2019

- 4 3321

Trial court: 3 33rd District Court of Harris Cou nty

Appellant, Western International Gas & Cylinders, Inc

. (“ Western ”)

, sued appellee, H&H

Land, L.P. (“H&H)

, for a judgment declaring the parties’ rights under three commercial lease s

. The trial court granted a summary j udgmen t for H&H . On appeal, this Co urt reversed and

remanded for further proceedings

. The Cour t denied en banc reconsideration.

Western has filed a n “ Emerg ency Motion for In junction and Stay

, ” in which it complains

that H&H has since “ subv ert[ed] this C ourt ’ s jurisdi ction over th e subj ect matter of t his appeal

by rushing to terminate the lea se s at issue an d ev ict Western from the subject property b e fore this

Court issu es its mandate. ” Western complains that H&H ’ s actions will render the appeal moot

a nd that Western c annot enforce this Court ’ s holding until the mandate issues

. West ern requests

a dditional relief that it must first seek at the tri al court level.

B ecause appellant ’ s motion demonstrates good cause to expedite issuance of the

man date, we gran t the motion and direct the clerk of this Court to issue the mandate

immediately. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 18.1(c).

I t is so ORDERED.

Judge’ s signature: / S/ Sherry Radack

 Acting individu ally

Date: December 9, 2022
#### ELSA R. WOLF, APPELLANT, v. ALBERT OESTREICHER, RESPONDENT.

Argued May 17, 1945

Decided September 27, 1945.

For the appellant, *Fred M. DeVoe*and *Ishmael STclareiu.*

For the respondent, *Cox c(; Walburg (Harry E. Walburg).*

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bodine, J.

The appeal in this case is from a judgment of nonsuit granted on the ground that whatever the injury shown it arose out of and in the course of the employment, and the remedy, if any, was in the Workmen’s Compensation Bureau.

The plaintiff, at the time of her injury, was being driven in an automobile owned by her employer, the defendant, Albert Oestreicher. They were on their wav to his factory in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania. The plaintiff was general manager and designer in this factory and it was the practice of her employer on Friday to drive her to New Brunswick, New Jersey, where he would turn over to her the car and she would drive it to her home in Piscataway Township, keeping it over the week-end and meeting him on Monday morning at the station in New Brunswick, when he would drive her to her work in Wilkes-Barre. This was being done at the time of the accident.

Obviously, the accident arose out of and in the course of the employment. The nonsuit was proper. The judgment will be affirmed.

*For affirmance*— Tins Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Dongbs, Heher, Perskte, Colie, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, JJ. 13.

*For reversal*— None.