alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10(el)3

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 3
                                       TO
                      DISTRIBUTION AND MARKETING AGREEMENT

This Amendment No. 3 to Distribution and Marketing Agreement ("Third Amendment")
is dated as of May 19, 2004 between Artera Group,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation
("Artera"), and Avaya Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Avaya").

WHEREAS, Artera and Avaya are parties to that certain Distribution and Marketing
Agreement  dated as of April 21,  2003,  as amended by  Amendment  No. 1 thereto
dated as of October 8, 2003,  as amended by Amendment  No. 2 thereto dated as of
April 21, 2004 (as so amended, "Distribution Agreement");

WHEREAS,  the parties wish to extend the term of the  Distribution  Agreement as
described herein.

NOW,  THEREFORE,  in consideration of the mutual covenants  contained herein, as
well as other good and valuable  consideration,  the receipt and  sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

TERM

Article  7 of the  Distribution  Agreement  is  hereby  amended  to  read in its
entirety as follows:

     "The term of this Agreement  shall begin on the Effective Date and,  unless
     extended or earlier  terminated by the written  agreement of the parties or
     pursuant to Article 8 below, shall expire on June 4, 2004."

General

Except as expressly amended by this Third Amendment,  the Distribution Agreement
will remain in full force and effect.  This Third  Amendment  may be executed in
one or more counterparts.  Each counterpart will be deemed an original,  but all
counterparts together will constitute one and the same instrument.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Third Amendment to be signed by
their duly authorized representatives.

AVAYA INC.                                      ARTERA GROUP, INC.


By:  /s/  Karen Schnitzer                       By:  /s/  Michael J. Parrella
     --------------------                            ------------------------
     Name:  Karen Schnitzer                          Name:  Michael J. Parrella
     Title: Sr. Purch. Specialist                    Title: Chairman & President
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 136 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                           May 1, 1997.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the 
resolution (H. Res. 129) providing amounts for the expenses of certain 
committees of the House of Representatives in the One Hundred Fifth Congress. 
The resolution shall be considered as read for amendment. The amendment in the 
nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on House Oversight now 
printed in the resolution shall be considered as adopted. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the resolution, as amended, to final adoption 
without intervening motion or demand for division of the question except: (1) 
one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on House Oversight; and (2) one motion to 
recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 443 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 443

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 21, 1998

    Mr. Foley (for himself and Mr. Lantos) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International 
                               Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Secretary 
   of State should seek certain commitments from the governments of 
   Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic regarding the payment of 
      insurance benefits owed to victims of the Nazis (and their 
              beneficiaries and heirs) by those countries.

    Resolved, 

SECTION 1. SENSE OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING PAYMENTS 
              OWED BY POLAND, HUNGARY, AND THE CZECH REPUBLIC TO 
              VICTIMS OF THE NAZIS.

    (a) Sense of the House of Representatives.--It is the sense of the 
House of Representatives that in future meetings and correspondence 
with the governments of Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic, the 
Secretary of State should--
            (1) raise the issue of insurance benefits owed to victims 
        of the Nazis (and their beneficiaries and heirs) by these 
        countries as a result of the actions taken by their communist 
        predecessor regimes in nationalizing foreign insurance 
        companies and confiscating their assets in the aftermath of 
        World War II;
            (2) seek to secure a commitment from the governments of 
        these countries to provide a full accounting of the total value 
        of insurance company assets that were seized by their communist 
        predecessors and to share all documents relevant to unpaid 
        insurance claims that are in their possession; and
            (3) seek to secure a commitment from the governments of 
        these countries to contribute to the payment of these unpaid 
        insurance claims in an amount that reflects the present value 
        of the assets seized by the communist governments (and for 
        which no compensation had previously been paid).
    (b) Definition.--As used in this paragraph, the term ``victims of 
the Nazis'' means persons persecuted during the period beginning on 
March 23, 1933 and ending on May 8, 1945, by, under the direction of, 
on behalf of, or under authority granted by the Nazi government of 
Germany or any nation allied with that government.
                                 <all>
```
Comments template for Draft SP 800-207 Please respond by November 22, 2019 Submitted by: IDSA 

Date: 11/21/19 

American Hospital Association 

Response to NIST Artificial Submitted September 15, 2021 Intelligence Risk Management 

Framework RFI 

General Comments 

Response # Responding organization Responder's name Paper 

Section (if 

applicable) 

Response/Comment (Include rationale) Suggested change 

1 American Hospital Association Samantha Burch 

Director, Health IT 

Policy 

The American Hospital Association (AHA) appreciates 

that the National Institute of Standards and 

Technology (NIST) is soliciting public feedback to 

inform the development of a voluntary Artificial 

Intelligence (AI) Risk Management Framework. We 

support this effort to improve the trustworthiness of 

AI systems and the transparent, open and 

collaborative approach NIST is undertaking to engage 

a broad range of stakeholders. While the framework is 

intended to be industry-agnostic, we anticipate this 

guidance will be useful and relevant as use of AI in 

health care continues to grow and evolve. 

General Comments 2 American Hospital Association Samantha Burch 

Director, Health IT 

Policy 

We further appreciate that NIST extended the 

original deadline for comments, providing additional 

time for interested parties to review the Request for 

Information (RFI) and respond. Moving forward, we 

encourage NIST to provide comment periods of at 

least 45 days to ensure adequate time for 

stakeholders to offer thorough input critical to 

informing the framework. The AHA looks forward to 

continuing to engage in this process. 

Responses to Specific Request for 

information (pages 11,12, 13 and 14 

of the RFI) 

Type: E - Editorial, G - General T - Technical 1 of 2 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments template for Draft SP 800-207 Please respond by November 22, 2019 Submitted by: IDSA 

Date: 11/21/19 

9. The appropriateness of the 

attributes NIST has developed for 

the AI Risk Management 

Framework. (See above, “AI RMF 

Development and Attributes”); 

3 American Hospital Association Samantha Burch 

Director, Health IT 

Policy 

The RFI identifies a number of elements and 

attributes the framework is expected to include such 

as be consensus-driven, provide common definitions, 

use plain language, be applicable to different 

organizations, be risk based, outcome-focused, 

voluntary, non-prescriptive and adaptable to different 

organizations. The AHA believes these elements and 

attributes are appropriate and will increase the value 

of the framework for stakeholders. We further 

appreciate that NIST underscores that this guidance is 

intended to be a “living document,” acknowledging 

that AI and its associated risks are dynamic in nature 

and will evolve over time. 

Type: E - Editorial, G - General T - Technical 2 of 2
**Exhibit
      32.2**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Otelco Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
      for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Curtis L. Garner, Jr., Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
      to my
      knowledge:


1.  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.




/s/
                  Curtis L. Garner, Jr.Curtis
                  L. Garner, Jr.
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
                June 25, 2007


*A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
#### William Short's Ex'r *v.*Catherine Short, etc.

Wills — Sale of Real Estate to Provide Income for Wife — Funds to be Raised Not Devised.

Where a will directs the sale of the testator’s real estate to provide an income for the use of the widow for life, neither the principal funds to «rise from the sale nor the personal property is devised.

APPEAL PROM HARDIN CIRCUIT COURT.

May 15, 1871.

*Brown & Murray, for appellant.*

Opinion by

Judge Hardin:

As we construe the will of William Short, it simply authorizes the sale and conversion of the testator’s real estate to provide an income for the use of his widow for life, charged also with the provisions made in the will for his children; and that neither the principal funds to arise from the sales of land, nor the personal estate was devised.

The opinion and judgment of the Circuit Court being inconsistent with this construction of the will, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a judgment in conformity with this opinion.
#### J. H. Taylor *v.*Wm. Duvall et al.

Judgment — Pleading—No Proof.

Where the material allegations of the petition are denied, it is error to render judgment against the defendant in the absence of any proof.

APPEAL PROM NELSON CIRCUIT COURT.

December 21, 1871.

*Muri, Wickliife, for appellant.*

*McKay, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

If it be conceded that appellees would have had a.right to subject the land sold by Taylor to Duvall to the payment of this note, disregarding the lien of Taylor, in case the allegations of the petition were true. Inasmuch as Taylor denied every allegation in this petition by which he could possibly be affected, and no proof whatever was taken, the judgment is erroneous, as to Taylor and so far as his rights are affected thereby, said judgment is reversed. The case is remanded with instructions to appellees to amend their pleading and to compel Taylor to enforce his lien, and for such further proceedings as will enable him to subject the interest of Duvall in the land, bought from Taylor, appellant.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 900 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 900

          To designate certain lands in Alaska as wilderness.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 1997

  Mr. Vento (for himself, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Yates, Mrs. Maloney of New 
York, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. Sanders, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Lantos, Mrs. Meek 
    of Florida, Mrs. Mink of Hawaii, Mr. Torres, Mr. Traficant, Ms. 
Woolsey, Mr. Kildee, Mr. Pastor, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Deutsch, Mr. Borski, 
  Mr. Clay, Ms. Rivers, Mrs. Kennelly of Connecticut, Mr. Meehan, Mr. 
 Kennedy of Rhode Island, Mr. Dellums, Mr. Ramstad, Mr. Oberstar, Mr. 
Minge, Mr. Fattah, Mr. Evans, Mr. Fazio of California, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. 
 Bonior, Mr. Waxman, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Sabo, Mrs. Morella, Mr. Holden, 
Mr. Skaggs, Ms. Lofgren, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Shays, Mr. Flake, 
  Mr. Gonzalez, Mrs. Lowey, Mr. Gejdenson, Ms. Furse, Mr. Markey, Mr. 
  Filner, Mr. Owens, Mr. Andrews, Mr. Romero-Barcelo, Mr. Cardin, Mr. 
     McHale, Mr. Brown of California, Mr. Boucher, Mr. Maloney of 
 Connecticut, Mr. Moran of Virginia, Mr. Hall of Ohio, Mr. Engel, Mr. 
      Olver, Mr. Stark, Mr. Serrano, Ms. McKinney, Mr. Kennedy of 
Massachusetts, Mr. Neal of Massachusetts, Mr. Payne, Mrs. Tauscher, Ms. 
  Slaughter, Mr. Farr of California, Mr. Matsui, Ms. DeGette, and Mr. 
   Berman) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To designate certain lands in Alaska as wilderness.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Morris K. Udall Wilderness Act of 
1997''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF WILDERNESS AREA.

    In furtherance of the provisions of the Wilderness Act, an area in 
Alaska comprising approximately 1,559,538 acres, as generally depicted 
on a map entitled ``Arctic National Wildlife Refuge--1002 Area 
Alternative E--Wilderness Designation'', dated October 28, 1991, and 
available for inspection in the offices of the Secretary of the 
Interior, is hereby designated as wilderness and, therefore, as a 
component of the National Wilderness Preservation System.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 220 (Friday, November 14, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68131-68132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26920]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

46 CFR Parts 30, 150, and 153

[Docket No. USCG-2013-0423]
RIN 1625-AB94


2013 Liquid Chemical Categorization Updates

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Interim rule; delay of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces an additional two-year delay of the 
effective date of its 2013 interim rule, which updates and revises 
tables that list liquid hazardous materials, liquefied gases, and 
compressed gases that have been approved by the Coast Guard and the 
International Maritime Organization for maritime transportation in 
bulk.

[[Page 68132]]

These tables also indicate how the pollution potential of each 
substance has been categorized. The Coast Guard received comments to 
our 2013 interim rule regarding technical errors in the revised tables 
and is working to correct those errors. The additional delay will allow 
the Coast Guard to complete its work to correct technical errors and 
solicit additional comments in a supplemental notice of proposed 
rulemaking, prior to finalizing the rule. This rulemaking promotes the 
Coast Guard's maritime safety and stewardship missions.

DATES: The effective date of the interim final rule published at 78 FR 
50147 (Aug. 16, 2013), delayed until January 16, 2014, at 78 FR 56837 
(Sept. 16, 2013), and further delayed until January 16, 2015, at 79 FR 
2106 (Jan. 13, 2014), is further delayed until January 16, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this rule, 
email or call Mr. Patrick Keffler, Coast Guard; email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0959687d7b606a62274827426c6f6f656c7b497c7a6a6e27646065"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6e3e0f1a1c070d05402f40250b0808020b1c2e1b1d0d0940030702">[email protected]</span></a>; telephone: 202-372-1424. If you have 
questions about viewing or submitting material to the docket, call 
Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-
9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document is issued under the authority 
of 5 U.S.C. 552(a).

    Dated: November 6, 2014.
J.G. Lantz,
Director of Commercial Regulations and Standards, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2014-26920 Filed 11-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

H-D U.S.A., LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

KAI PING MEI PARK KAIPING STORE, et 

al.,

Defendants.

 Case No. 20-cv-03688

 Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman

 Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cummings

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL UNDER RULE 41(a)(1)

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Plaintiff H-D U.S.A., 

LLC (“Harley-Davidson” or “Plaintiff”) hereby dismisses this action with prejudice as to the 

following Defendant:

Defendant Name Line No. 

MUSONLAI Official Store 7

Dated this 25th day of September 2020. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ RiKaleigh C. Johnson

Amy C. Ziegler

Justin R. Gaudio

RiKaleigh C. Johnson

Martin F. Trainor

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500

Chicago, Illinois 60606

312.360.0080 / 312.360.9315 (facsimile)

aziegler@gbc.law

jgaudio@gbc.law

rjohnson@gbc.law

mtrainor@gbc.law

Attorneys for Plaintiff H-D U.S.A., LLC 

Case: 1:20-cv-03688 Document #: 64 Filed: 09/25/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1814
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Jeff Chandler, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Pro-Tech Transmissions, LLC, an Arizona 

limited liability corporation; Ray Razack 

and BiBi Razack, husband and wife, 

Defendants. 

No. CV16-0299-PHX DGC 

ORDER 

The Court has received the parties’ joint motion for approval. Doc. 18. 

IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ joint motion for approval (Doc. 18) is 

granted. 

Dated this 14th day of June, 2016. 

Case 2:16-cv-00299-DGC Document 20 Filed 06/14/16 Page 1 of 1
H. Res. 33

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 21, 1997.

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and he

is hereby, elected to the following standing committee:

COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE: Mr. Sawyer of Ohio, to

rank directly below Mr. Engel of New York.

Attest:

Clerk.
exv10w07



 





Exhibit 10.07




ELECTRONIC ARTS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES




DESCRIPTION OF REGISTRANT’S FISCAL YEAR 2005

EXECUTIVE OFFICER BONUS PLAN



Target annual bonuses are set for each executive officer based upon a
percentage of base salary. Bonuses for executive officers reporting to the
Chief Executive Officer are generally paid in two parts, one of which relates
only to the Company’s earnings results, and one of which is discretionary and
is measured against each individual’s contributions. Other executive officers
have a third part which relates to a specific business unit’s or product’s
financial performance. Bonuses are paid after the end of the fiscal year. If
profits in any period are less than 85 percent of the Company’s plan, no bonus
based on the Company’s performance may be paid for that period. If profits
exceed plan during a period, the bonus rate is accelerated for the incremental
profits above plan, with a maximum of 200 percent payout of the bonus target.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 155 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          May 22, 1997.
    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI for a two-thirds 
vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is 
presented to the House is waived with respect to any resolution reported before 
May 23, 1997, providing for consideration or disposition of any of the following 
measures:
            (1) A concurrent resolution on the budget, an amendment thereto, a 
        conference report thereon, or an amendment reported in disagreement from 
        a conference thereon.
            (2) The bill (H.R. 1469) making emergency supplemental 
        appropriations for recovery from natural disasters, and for overseas 
        peacekeeping efforts, including those in Bosnia, for the fiscal year 
        ending September 30, 1997, and for other purposes, an amendment thereto, 
        a conference report thereon, or an amendment reported in disagreement 
        from a conference thereon.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```