alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 322

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 13, 1997.

Whereas at the conclusion of the Gulf War the United States

and the United Nations, acting through the Security

Council, determined to find and destroy all of Iraq’s capability to produce chemical, biological, and nuclear

weapons and its ability to produce missiles capable of delivering such weapons of mass destruction;

Whereas in pursuit of this goal, the United Nations set up

a special multinational commission of experts to oversee

the completion of this task (the United Nations Special

Commission—UNSCOM), and that task could and

should have been accomplished within a matter of months

if Iraq had cooperated with United Nations officials;

Whereas sanctions were imposed upon Iraq to insure its compliance with United Nations directives to eliminate its capability to produce weapons of mass destruction;

Whereas for 61⁄2 years Iraq has pursued a policy of deception, lies, concealment, harassment, and intimidation in a

deliberate effort to hamper the work of UNSCOM in

eliminating Iraq’s ability to produce and deliver weapons

of mass destruction; and

Whereas recently the Government of Iraq has escalated its

policy of noncompliance and continues to breach in a ma-
2

•HRES 322 EH

terial way United Nations Security Council resolutions by

refusing to permit United States citizens who are recognized specialists to participate as members of UNSCOM

teams in carrying out in Iraq actions to implement Security Council resolutions: Now, therefore, be it

That it is the sense of the House of Representatives

that—

(1) the current crisis regarding Iraq should be resolved peacefully through diplomatic means but in a

manner which assures full Iraqi compliance with United

Nations Security Council resolutions regarding the destruction of Iraq’s capability to produce and deliver

weapons of mass destruction;

(2) in the event that military means are necessary

to compel Iraqi compliance with United Nations Security

Council resolutions, such military action should be undertaken with the broadest feasible multinational support, preferably pursuant to a decision of the United Nations Security Council; and

(3) if it is necessary, however, the United States

should take military action unilaterally to compel Iraqi
3

•HRES 322 EH

compliance with United Nations Security Council resolutions.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I have reviewed the Amended Annual Report of OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), and I, Richard L. Browdy, President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of and for the period covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                                                               
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 29, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Richard L. Browdy                                                                                         
|                     |  |  |  | Richard L. Browdy, President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer)
#### Commonwealth of Kentucky for the Use of John S. Parrish’s Administrator *v.*P. C. Bedford.

Sheriffs and Constables — Collection of Money Without Execution — Default — Sureties Not Responsible.

A sheriff has no right to collect money upon a judgment by virtue of his office, and when he does so without first having an execution his sureties on his official bond are not responsible in case he fails to pay over the money to the plaintiff.

APPEAL FROM MONTGOMERY CIRCUIT COURT.

October 11, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

The debt in this case was not’ paid to the sheriff Bedford until the date of the receipt in October, 1864. No execution was then in the hands of the sheriff, as the proof of 'the clerk shows that none was issued after 1863. This execution had been returned by the sheriff and destroyed by fire with other records in the clerk’s office long before the payment' is alleged to have *244been made. There is no' proof of any levy by the sheriff in 1863, or at any other time, on the property of the defendant in the execution, and as the sheriff had no right to collect the money upon a judgment by virtue of his office, his sureties are not responsible. The variance between the allegations of the petition and the proof as to the parties defendant in the execution is not such an error as would authorize a reversal of the judgment rendered against Bedford. The judgment is affirmed on the original and cross-appeal.

*Reid, for appellant.*

*Apperson, for appelee.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KIRBY STEWART, A/K/A KEVIN 

WILLIAMS, 

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 550 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 833

To require the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study regarding Fort

King, Florida.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 25, 1997

Mr. STEARNS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To require the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study

regarding Fort King, Florida.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.

4 The Congress finds that—

5 (1) the Second Seminole War, 1835–1837, is

6 an important period of conflict in the history of the

7 Nation and lasted longer than any other armed con8 flict in which the Nation participated, except the

9 Vietnam War;
2

•HR 833 IH

1 (2) Fort King, in central Florida, played an im2 portant historic role in the Second Seminole War as

3 the site of the outbreak of hostilities between the

4 United States Government and the Seminole Indians

5 of Florida, who were led by Seminole Indian Chief

6 Osceola;

7 (3) Fort King represents a unique site for ex8 ploration and interpretation of the attack that ig9 nited the Second Seminole War on December 28,

10 1835; and

11 (4) Fort King and the surrounding area contain

12 materials and artifacts used in the attack and in the

13 life of the Seminole Indians.

14 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT OF STUDY.

15 The Secretary of the Interior (hereinafter in this Act

16 referred to as the ‘‘Secretary’’) shall conduct a study to

17 identify potential means to preserve, develop, and inter18 pret Fort King, in central Florida, and the surrounding

19 area. As part of the study, the Secretary shall propose

20 alternatives for cooperation in the preservation and inter21 pretation of Fort King and shall provide recommendations

22 with respect to the suitability and feasibility of establish23 ing Fort King as a unit of the National Park System.
3

•HR 833 IH

1 SEC. 3. FINDINGS INCLUDED IN STUDY.

2 The study required by section 2 shall contain, but

3 need not be limited to, findings with respect to—

4 (1) the role played by Fort King in the Second

5 Seminole War;

6 (2) identification of the historical, cultural, and

7 archaeological material found in Fort King and the

8 surrounding area relating to life at the time of and

9 preceding the Second Seminole War;

10 (3) the types of Federal, State, and local pro11 grams that are available to preserve and develop

12 Fort King and the surrounding area and to make

13 the fort and the surrounding area accessible for pub14 lic use and enjoyment; and

15 (4) the potential use of, and coordination with,

16 Federal, State, and local programs to manage, in

17 the public interest, the historical and cultural re18 sources found at and around Fort King.

19 SEC. 4. CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW.

20 The Secretary shall submit a report detailing the re21 sults of the study required by section 2 to the committees

22 of jurisdiction of the House of Representatives and the

23 Senate not later than 12 months after the date of the en24 actment of this Act.

Æ
#### Milton Wormick, etc., *v.*David Bryant, etc.

Vendor and Purchaser — Parol Contract for Land — Abandonment by Vendor —Purchase Money.

Appellant’s vendor having elected to abandon the parol contract for the sale of the land to their ancestor, they have a lien on the land for the purchase money, and his subsequent vendee, with notice of appellant’s lien, can occupy no better position than his vendor.

APPEAL FROM ADAIR CIRCUIT COURT.

February 27, 1872.

*10
      *Winfrey & Winfrey, for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

Appellant’s vendor having elected to abandon the parol contract for the sale of the land to their ancestor, they certainly had a lien on the land for the purchase money which had been actually paid, which would have been- enforceable if he had not parted with it. And his subsequent vendee, with notice of appellant’s lien, can occupy no better position than his vendor. -And if he bought with notice of the lien, as is alleged in the petition, he takes it subject to the incumbrance. Wherefore the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions to overrule the demurrer to the petition and for further proceedings consistent herewith.
9097.

#### Seaman *v.*Sweat.

Wade, C. J.

The gravamen of the plaintiff’s petition is substantially that the defendant, being desirous of forming a corporation, induced the plaintiff to subscribe for a share of stock in the embryo corporation, under the following agreement: that if the plaintiff would subscribe for said share of stock, the defendant “would personally pledge himself and guarantee to this plaintiff that he would not have to pay for or keep said stock, as he would take and pay for the same himself if petitioner did not want it, and the defendant could not fin'd a purchaser for it;” that “with this assurance and guarantee, made by said defendant *in parol*[italics ours], he being directly and personally interested in the promotion of said Farmers Warehouse Company, and being financially interested in the same, petitioner, relying solely upon said promise of defendant to pay and take said one share of stock himself, or to secure some one else to do so, subscribed for the same in order to enable the said J. L. Sweat ["the defendant] to save himself from the embarrassment of having pledged one share of stock for this petitioner. Petitioner avers that he did not want said stock, and would not have subscribed for the same had not defendant made the promise *93and statements alleged, and that it was solely on account of said promises and assurances of defendant that he subscribed for the same.” *Eeld,*that the petition was subject to demurrer, on the ground that the contract rested in parol; and therefore the court did not err in dismissing the suit. See Civil Code (1910), § 3222 (7); *Hightower*v. *Ansley,*126 *Ga.*8 (54 S. E. 939, 7 Ann. Cas. 927); Morse v. Douglas, 112 App. Div. 798 (99 N. Y. Supp. 392); Cook on Corporations (7th ed.), § 339; *Weatherly*v. *Cotter,*142 *Ga.*457 (83 S. E. 104). *Judgment affirmed.*

Decided March 15, 1918.

Action for breach of contract; from city court of Waycross— Judge McDonald. June 16, 1917.

*Parker &*Parker, for plaintiff.

*Wilson &*Benneit, for defendant.

*Jenkins and Luke, JJ., eoneur.*
#### H. N. Creely, etc., *v.*W. H. Kemper and Wife.

Fraudulent Conveyance — Conveyance to Wife Before Creation of Debt.

At the time of the execution of the deed and assignment of the bond to Mrs. Kemper, her husband was not indebted to the appellants, therefore her right to the property is superior to that of any of her husband’s creditors.

APPEAL FROM FLEMING CIRCUIT COURT.

October 19, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

At the time of the execution of the deed to Mrs. Kemper for the property in the town of Elizaville, and the assignment of the bond to her for the title for the Stewart house and lot, her husband was not indebted to the appellant.

The husband of Mrs. Kemper seems to have been a reckless, wild and improvident young man and upon his arrival of age his guardian, seeing doubtless that his wife and children would be reduced to want, advised him to pay off his debts and secure his property to them. His debts were all paid except two small debts that he had created during his minority, and under the advice of his guardian and friends, he did secure this property now sought to be subjected to these debts, to his wife and *649children. The deed to the tavern property was entered of record, and the fact of the transfer of the Stewart bond to the wife was not attempted to be concealed from any one.

*Throop, for appellants.*

*Phister, Cord, for appellees.*

We are satisfied that the right of the wife to this property should not be interfered with for the purpose of enabling the appellants to make their debts. Her right to the property so fair as this record shows is superior to that of any of the husband’s creditors. The judgment of the court below is affirmed.
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 303 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                 House Calendar No. 126
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 303

                          [Report No. 105-380]

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2676) to amend the 
 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restructure and reform the Internal 
                Revenue Service, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 4, 1997

    Mr. Dreier, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2676) to amend the 
 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restructure and reform the Internal 
                Revenue Service, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 2676) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
to restructure and reform the Internal Revenue Service, and for other 
purposes. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The 
amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 
Ways and Means now printed in the bill, modified by the amendments 
printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 
resolution, shall be considered as adopted. All points of order against 
the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate on the bill, as 
amended, which shall be equally divided and controlled by the chairman 
and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) 
one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
                                     





                                                 House Calendar No. 126

105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 303

                          [Report No. 105-380]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2676) to amend the 
 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restructure and reform the Internal 
                Revenue Service, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 4, 1997

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

12 

CAF 13-01327 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTIAN L. JONES, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LAURA S. TUCKER, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

 

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE, HANCOCK ESTABROOK, LLP

(ALAN J. PIERCE OF COUNSEL), PRO BONO APPEALS PROGRAM, ALBANY, FOR

RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

MARRIS & BARTHOLOMAE, P.C., SYRACUSE (WILLIAM R. BARTHOLOMAE OF

COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

SUSAN B. MARRIS, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, MANLIUS. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County

(Salvatore Pavone, R.), entered May 16, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant

to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, awarded

petitioner sole legal and physical custody of the subject child. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as

it concerns visitation is unanimously dismissed and the order is

affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: We affirm the order granting the petition seeking

modification of a prior order of custody for reasons stated in the

decision at Family Court. We note only that a subsequent order of the

same court, entered July 22, 2014, which modified the provisions

regarding visitation, has rendered moot the contention of respondent

mother that the court erred in failing to provide her with more

extensive visitation (see Matter of Kirkpatrick v Kirkpatrick, 117

AD3d 1575, 1576). 

Entered: February 6, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 266

Recognizing and congratulating Northeastern University on its one-hundredth

anniversary.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 9, 1997

Mr. MOAKLEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and the Workforce

RESOLUTION

Recognizing and congratulating Northeastern University on

its one-hundredth anniversary.

Whereas on October 16, 1997, Northeastern University will

mark its centennial, celebrating 100 years as a vital institution of higher education in the city of Boston;

Whereas from its humble beginnings at the Boston YMCA,

as its founder and first director, Franklin Palmer Speare,

remarked, ‘‘We started with an eraser and two sticks of

chalk’’, Northeastern University has evolved into a nationally recognized university offering educational opportunities to a diverse student body from the city, the commonwealth, and around the world;

Whereas in 1912 President William Howard Taft laid the

cornerstone for the present-day campus, which was ex-
2

•HRES 266 IH

panded in 1929 when the Boston Red Sox departed for

a ‘‘new’’ Fenway Park;

Whereas Northeastern University has distinguished itself as

the preeminent practice-oriented university, serving as

the national model for cooperative education, where classroom education and professional experience are successfully combined;

Whereas Northeastern University is emerging as a prominent

research university, where the work of talented scholars

in a variety of disciplines is advancing knowledge and

contributing to the betterment of society; and

Whereas at the core of Northeastern University is its mission

as an urban university with an unwavering commitment

to the city of Boston, as evidenced by its longstanding

partnership with the Boston public schools, its varied

community service programs, and its efforts to promote

economic development and housing creation in its neighborhood: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That—

2 (1) Northeastern University is an outstanding

3 educational institution that has contributed uniquely

4 to the urban fabric of Boston; and

5 (2) the House of Representatives congratulates

6 Northeastern University on its one-hundredth anni7 versary and wishes the university much success

8 throughout its centennial year.

Æ
#### Laura L. Evans *v.*James H. Leech, Exr.

Husband and Wife — Marriage of Debtor with Creditor — Debt Released in Law — Equity Changes the Rule.

The marriage of a creditor with her debtor releases the debt in law, on the principle that husband and wife are one person, but equity so far qualified this rule as to permit a feme sole to hold and enjoy her property.

APPEAL PROM CALDWELL CIRCUIT COURT.

November 10, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

By the marriage of appellant with her debtor, the debt was released in law, on the principle that husband and wife are but one person; but equity so far qualified this rule of law as to permit a *feme sole*to hold, and enjoy property to her sole use, as where property is given to her ,for her sole use, or where *655other expressions are used, showing that a gift is intended for the separate use of the wife. The money for which the note was given belonged at the time to Mrs. Evans, and if her husband, after the marriage, had agreed to pay it.to a trustee for her separate use the contract would have been binding in law. And if there had been an agreement by the husband to pay the amount of the note to his wife, being based on the consideration that the money was hers, a court of equity would enforce the agreement, but in this case no agreement or provision on the part of the husband is alleged. The averment is that he always intended to pay it. That is only a conclusion of law. Facts should have been alleged constituting an agreement or contract to pay. A mere intention is not sufficient.

*Marble, for appellant.*

*Darby, for appellee.*

Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed.*
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 222

For the relief of Vince Munoz, Governor of the Tribal Council of the Ysleta

del Sur Pueblo and all other enrolled members of the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 5, 1997

Mr. REYES submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

For the relief of Vince Munoz, Governor of the Tribal Council of the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and all other enrolled

members of the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo.

1 Resolved, That H.R. ll, entitled ‘‘A bill for the re2 lief of Vince Munoz, Governor of the Tribal Council of the

3 Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and all other enrolled members of

4 the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo’’, now pending in the House

5 of Representatives, together with all of the accompanying

6 papers, is hereby referred to the Chief Judge of the United

7 States Court of Federal Claims and the Chief Judge of

8 the United States Court of Federal Claims shall proceed
2

•HRES 222 IH

1 with the same in accordance with the provisions of sections

2 1492 and 2509 of title 28, United States Code.

Æ