alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
9627.

#### Bailey *v.*The State.

Decided October 9, 1918.

Conviction of manslaughter; from Early superior court—Judge Highsmith, presiding.

' *Parle & Stone,*for plaintiff in error.

*B. T.*Oastellow, *solicitor-general, R. R. Arnold,*contra.

Bloodworth, J.

1. When considered in connection with the entire charge of the court, the excerpts complained of contain no error which would require that the verdict be set aside.

2. There was ample evidence to authorize a verdict of voluntary manslaughter.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.*
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 849

To prohibit an alien who is not lawfully present in the United States from

receiving assistance under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real

Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 26, 1997

Mr. PACKARD (for himself, Mr. BILBRAY, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. HUNTER,

Mr. ROHRABACHER, and Mr. TRAFICANT) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To prohibit an alien who is not lawfully present in the

United States from receiving assistance under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DISPLACED PERSON DEFINED.

4 Section 101(6)(B) of the Uniform Relocation Assist5 ance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970

6 (42 U.S.C. 4601(6)(B)) is amended—
2

•HR 849 IH

1 (1) by striking the period at the end of clause

2 (ii) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

3 (2) by adding at the end the following:

4 ‘‘(iii) an alien that is not lawfully present

5 in the United States.’’.

Æ
2023 Time and Frequency Seminar

Agenda

Monday, July 10, 2023

8:00 - 9:00 Registration and check-in; 9:00 – 9:10 Introductions by David Howe

9:10 - 9:40 (CH1) Timekeeping and Time Distribution, Elizabeth Donley

9:40 - 10:10 (CH2) Oscillator Measurement Definitions and Concepts – I, David Howe

10:10 - 10:30 Break

10:30 - 11:00 (CH2) Clock Measurement Definitions and Concepts – II, David Howe

11:00 - 12:00 (CH3) Introduction to Time Domain Measurement Standards, Jeff Sherman

12:00 - 1:30 Lunch

1:30 - 3:00 (CH4) Time-Domain Analysis, Jeff Sherman

3:00 - 3:20 Break

3:20 - 4:20 (CH5) Time-Domain and Frequency-Domain Characterizations, David Howe

4:20 - 5:20 (CH6) Introduction to GNSS for Position, Navigation, and Timing, Penina 

Axelrad

Tuesday, July 11, 2023

8:30 -8:45 Craig Nelson / David Howe: Announcements

8:45 – 9:45 (CH7) Techniques of State-of-the-Art PM and AM Noise Measurements, 

Craig Nelson

9:45 – 10:15 (CH8) Direct Digital Measurement of Precision Oscillators, Marco Pomponio

10:15 - 10:35 Break

10:35 - 11:15 (CH9) Vibration-Induced Phase Noise: Oscillators and Non-Oscillatory 

Components, Archita Hati

11:15 - 12:30 (CH10) 2-Way Time Transfer & Development of Sr clock, Roger Brown

12:00 - 1:15 Lunch

1:15 - 2:20 (CH11) Demonstration of Basic Measurements of Time and Frequency, 

Andrew Novick

2:20 - 2:45 Break

2:45 - 4:00 (CH12) Phase Noise Measurement Demonstration, Archita Hati

4:00 - 5:00 Hands-on Test and Noise Measurements, Archita Hati

5:30 - 8:00 Open House

Wednesday, July 12, 2023

8:00 - 8:15 Questions and Answers

8:15 - 9:00 (CH13) Optical Atomic Frequency Standards, Chun-Chia Chen

9:00 - 9:50 (CH14) Cs Fountains at NIST, Gregory Hoth

9:50 - 10:20 (CH15) Time Transfer Alternatives to GNSS and an example using HDTV, 

Jeff Sherman

10:20 - 10:40 Break

10:40 - 11:20 (CH16) Precise and Accurate Network Timing, Jeff Sherman

11:20 - 12:00 (CH17) Progress in Optical Frequency Combs, Tara Fortier

12:00 Conclusion and Discussion
2019 NIST Precision Measurement Grants

Dr. Shimon Kolkowitz, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI

Tests of relativity using a multiplexed optical lattice clock

The research goal is to design an optical lattice clock (OLC) apparatus dedicated to exploring emerging applications of ultra-precise clocks, and in particular to performing novel

tests of relativity. The proposed “multiplexed” OLC will enable differential measurements

between atom ensembles in independent lattices within the same vacuum chamber in order

to eliminate the detrimental effects of clock laser noise and common mode environmental

fluctuations. This will push the levels of clock stability and atom-atom coherence that can

be achieved in an OLC. It is anticipated to reach differential stabilities of 5 × 1018/τ , which

would represent an improvement in stability of almost one order of magnitude over the

current best demonstrated differential comparisons between independent clocks. The multiplexed OLC will also be designed to enable large accelerations of the atoms along the lattice

axes. These unique capabilities will be harnessed to perform novel tests of relativity in a

tabletop experiment, including measuring the gravitational redshift due to Earths gravity

at the millimeter scale, and observing the special relativistic analogue to the gravitational

redshift in accelerating reference frames.

Dr. Timothy Kovachy, Northwestern University

Development of Levitated, Macroscopically Delocalized Atom Interferometers for a New Measurement of Newtons Constant G

Quantum mechanical measurements of G based on atom interferometric gravity gradiometers are an important complement to classical measurements, as they have a different set

of systematic errors. Owing to recent advances in atomic physics, it appears that previously dominant systematic errors in atom interferometric G measurements can be highly

suppressed. In the next generation of atomic G measurements, proof mass density inhomogeneities are expected to be a limiting systematic effect. This proposal aims to develop and

demonstrate techniques to improve the sensitivity of atom interferometric gravity gradiometers by a factor of 100 over the current state-of-the-art. This level of sensitivity would open a

path for improved atom interferometric measurements of G by allowing such measurements

to trade off higher proof mass density for better density homogeneity by using single-crystal

silicon, while maintaining sufficient statistical resolution in the measurement.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with Annual Report of Kid Castle
      Educational Corporation, a Florida Corporation (the “Registrant”), on Form 10-Q
      for the fiscal period ending March 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission , the undersigned hereby certifies that:





1.
      To the
      best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      To the
      best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of
      the Registrant.




DATE:
                    July 25, 2007
                BY:
                /s/
                  Min Tan YangMIN
                    TAN YANG
                  CHIEF
                      EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  DATE:
                        July 25, 2007
                    BY:
                    /s/
                      Suang-Yi PaiSUANG-YI
                        PAI
                      CHIEF
                        FINANCIAL OFFICER
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA to Provide Coverage of SpaceX Commercial Crew Flight Test","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"lsOg5SUI0K\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-to-provide-coverage-of-spacex-commercial-crew-flight-test\/\">NASA to Provide Coverage of SpaceX Commercial Crew Flight Test<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-to-provide-coverage-of-spacex-commercial-crew-flight-test\/embed\/#?secret=lsOg5SUI0K\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA to Provide Coverage of SpaceX Commercial Crew Flight Test” — NASA\" data-secret=\"lsOg5SUI0K\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/dragonliftoff_1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
Opinion issued September 13 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals
For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 8
- 00 7 6 8
- CV

——————————— IN RE C.K. AND J.P. , Relator s

O rigi n al Proceeding on Petition f o r Writ o f Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator s , C.K. and J.P. , ha ve filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, challenging the trial court’s “Order for Protection of a Child in an Emergency” in
the underlying proceeding

. 1
W e deny the petition.

1 The underlying case is In the Interest Z. K

. - P. , C ause N o. 1 8CP0137 , in the 306 th District Court of Galveston. Respondent in this Court is the Honorable Lonnie Cox

.2 PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings , Higley, and Massengale

.
|Certification Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Wallin Engines Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, M. Stephen Brown,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|                   |  |     |  |                                                                            | 
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Date: May 11, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ M. Stephen Brown                                                       | 
|                   |  |     |  | M. Stephen Brown    Chief
Executive Officer and    Chief Financial Officer | 

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Wallin Engines Corporation and will be
retained by Wallin Engines Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
--

Subject: EXT :FW: One imput re NIST CSF 2.0 concept paper 

Date: Thursday, March 9, 2023 1:23:57 PM 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening 

attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. 

FYI 

Sent: Friday, March 3, 2023 6:31 AM 

To: cyberframework <cyberframework@nist.gov> 

Cc: rainer.kessler@fhnw.ch 

Subject: One imput re NIST CSF 2.0 concept paper 

Dear NIST CSF team, 

I suggest to include the security governance structure according to the three-lines-of-defense 

model, as mandated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). Although not all companies have to adhere to 

SOX, the three-lines-of-defense model (line 1: risk management / line 2: risk control / line 3: internal 

audit) has become a global "quasi-standard" for good risk (and security) governance. I am very happy 

to provide additional information, but as an first input, check your thoughts on this topic. 

(My relation to NIST CSF: I am a former global CISO of a SOX-relevant corporation; a former 

technology audit partner of a 'big-4 company'; a former military defense CISO; and since more than a 

decade I teach cybersecurity at university level - and have included the NIST CSF as backbone in the 

teaching of a CAS course on cybersecurity.) 

Best regards, 

Rainer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
for the periods covered in the Report.
  /s/         Carlos E. AgüeroCarlos E. AgüeroChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
9362.

#### Fitzpatrick Company *v.*Shepherd *et al.*

Broyles, P. J.

1. Under section 5298 of the Civil Code of 1910, before it was amended, laborers were exempt from the process of garnishment on *all*of their daily, weekly, or monthly wages, whether in the hands of their employers or of other persons. Under that law, where a garnishee set up in his answer that the fund in his possession was not subject to garnishment because it was a debt due-for daily, weekly, or monthly wages of a laborer, the answer was sufficiently full; and he was discharged, unless the answer was traversed. *Smith*v. *Johnson,*71 *Ga.*748; *Armour Packing Co.*v. *Winn,*119 *Ga.*683 (46 S. E. 865); *Southern Ry. Co.*v. *Fulford,*125 *Ga.*103 (54 S. E. 68, 5 Ann. Cas. 168). However, under that code-section as amended by the act of the General Assembly, approved August 14, 1914 (Ga. L. 1914, p. 62), which is the law now in force, fifty per cent, of the excess of $1.25 per day of all wages of a laborer is subject to garnishment, and where a garnishee answers in substance merely that the fund in his possession is exempt for the reason that it is due for wages of a laborer, without stating specifically when the wages referred to were earned by the defendant, and whether they were earned as daily, weekly, or monthly wages, the answer is incomplete and is subject to exceptions. In this case, however, the plaintiff in fi. fa.' having filed no exceptions or traverse to the incomplete answer of the garnishee, the trial court did not err in discharging the garnishee and in ordering that the property which the answer admitted was in his hands be turned over to the defendant in fi. fa.

*45Decided March 13, 1918.

Certiorari; from Morgan superior court—Judge Park. -November 2, 1917'

*M. G. Few,*for plaintiff:.

*Williford & Lambert,*for defendants.

2. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.*
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. AP-76,559, AP-76,560, AP-76,561, AP-76,562,

AP-76,563 AP-76,564 & AP-76,565

EX PARTE ANA HERNANDEZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 20090D02785, 20090D03532, 20100D03838, 20100D03839,

20100D03891, 20090D04299 & 20090D04427

IN THE 171ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM EL PASO COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of seven counts

of theft and sentenced to 15 months’ imprisonment on each count. She did not appeal her

convictions. 

Applicant contends that she did not receive the benefit of the bargain in her plea agreements.
2

We remanded these applications to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law. The

trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law and recommended that we grant relief. Relief

is granted. The judgments in cause numbers 20090D02785, 20090D03532, 20100D03838,

20100D03839, 20100D03891, 20090D04299, and 20090D04427 in the 171st Judicial District

Court of El Paso County are set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of El

Paso County to answer the charges as set out in the indictments.

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: May 25, 2011

Do Not Publish
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF 

ILLINOIS, et al.,

 Plaintiffs, 

 and 

KYLE KOPITKE, 

 Plaintiff-Intervenor, 

 v. 

J.B. PRITZKER, et al.,

 Defendant. 

 Case No. 20 C 2112 

Judge Harry D. Leinenweber 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff-Intervenor Kyle Kopitke’s Motion for Attorneys’ 

Fees (Dkt. No. 101) is granted in part. 

STATEMENT 

Plaintiff-Intervenor Kyle Kopitke (“Kopitke”) requests 

attorneys’ fees pursuant to Local Rule 54.3. (Rule 54.3 Fee Motion, 

Dkt. No. 101.) The claimant “bears the burden of establishing 

entitlement to [a fee] award and documenting the appropriate hours 

expended and hourly rates.” Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 

437 (1983). The claimant met this burden. (See Exhibits 1-12, Dkt. 

No. 101.) His attorney bills at a $475 hourly rate and tracked 

Case: 1:20-cv-02112 Document #: 120 Filed: 03/31/23 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1200
- 2 -

61.98 hours of time on the substantive suit, totaling $29,440.50. 

(Exhibit 4, Joint Statement, Dkt. No. 101-4.) Billing at this same 

rate, he recorded spending 34.7 hours on the fee motion itself, 

totaling $16,482.50. (Id.) The sum of these requests is $45,923.00. 

(Id.) The attorney purchased three transcripts for court 

proceedings in April and May 2020. (Id.) The costs were: $33.60, 

$45.60, and $24.00, totaling $103.20. (Id. at 4.) The grand total 

of his request amounts to $46,026.00.

The Court finds that Kopitke’s counsel’s participation in the 

case proved meaningful and he thus entitles him to some fees. Yet, 

most of the intervenor’s work was based on a reliance on the 

previous filed work of Plaintiffs’ attorneys. The Court will deduct 

50% for redundancy. Half of his request for fees for his legal 

work for the substantive suit, requested at $29,440.50, is 

$14,720.25.

The Court finds his fees for presenting a fee petition 

excessive but recognizes his partial success. The Court will 

deduct 50% of his request for fees related to this Motion. Half 

of his request of $16,482.50 is $8,241.25. 

He may be compensated fully for the costs he incurred for 

transcripts of court records.

The summation of these figures is $14,720.25 + $8,241.25 + 

$103.20 = $23,064.70.

Case: 1:20-cv-02112 Document #: 120 Filed: 03/31/23 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:1201
- 3 - 

In total, the Court grants in part Plaintiff-Intervenor 

Kopitke’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (Dkt. No. 101). Kopitke is 

entitled to reimbursement in the amount of $23,064.70. 

 

 

 Harry D. Leinenweber, Judge 

 United States District Court 

Dated: 3/31/2023 

Case: 1:20-cv-02112 Document #: 120 Filed: 03/31/23 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:1202
<Page>
                                                                Exhibit 10.13


                               CHS MANAGEMENT III, L.P.
                                10 SOUTH WACKER DRIVE
                                     SUITE 3175
                                 CHICAGO, IL 60606

                                  August 21, 1997


Beacon Sales Acquisition, Inc.
50 Webster Avenue
Somerville, MA 02143

Gentlemen:

     CHS Management III, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("CHS"),
desires to perform certain management services for Beacon Sales Acquisition,
Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Beacon"), and Beacon desires CHS to perform
the management services as set forth herein.

     Beacon hereby engages CHS to provide, and CHS agrees to provide, certain
management services for Beacon including, without limitation, consultation
regarding the business and operations of Beacon, locating investment
opportunities for Beacon and other management services reasonably requested
by the directors or officers of Beacon.

     CHS's obligation to provide such management services for Beacon shall
commence on the date hereof and, unless sooner terminated as mutually agreed
upon by the parties, shall terminate on the first (1st) anniversary of the
date hereof, but is automatically renewable for successive one-year periods
unless either party terminates upon at least thirty days written notice prior
to the expiration of any such period. As compensation for CHS's management
services to be rendered hereunder, Beacon shall pay CHS an annual fee (the
"CHS Management Fees") in the amount of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars
($300,000) payable on a monthly basis in arrears. In addition, Beacon shall
reimburse CHS for all reasonable direct expenses incurred by CHS in
connection with providing the management services described herein.

     This agreement may be terminated by the Board of Directors of Beacon in
the event the Board of Directors determines in good faith that CHS has
materially failed to diligently provide the management services provided
herein to Beacon. In the event of such termination by the Board of Directors,
Beacon's obligations hereunder shall cease and CHS shall forfeit all right to
receive any

<Page>

Beacon Sales Acquisition, Inc.
August 21, 1997
Page 2

future compensation hereunder, except that CHS shall be entitled to its pro
rata share of compensation for services already performed as of the date of
termination and to reimbursement for all reasonable direct expenses incurred
by CHS as of such date in connection with providing the management services
described herein.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        CHS Management III, L.P.

                                        By:  Code Hennessy & Simmons LLC,
                                              its general partner


                                             By:   /s/ Peter M. Gotsch
                                                  --------------------------


Accepted and Agreed to this
21st day of August, 1997.

Beacon Sales Acquisition, Inc.


By:   /s/ Peter M. Gotsch
     --------------------------