alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 393

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 26, 1998.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 3246) to assist small businesses and labor organizations in defending themselves against Government bureaucracy; to ensure that employees entitled to reinstatement

get their jobs back quickly; to protect the right of employers

to have a hearing to present their case in certain representation cases; and to prevent the use of the National Labor Relations Act for the purpose of disrupting or inflicting economic harm on employers. The first reading of the bill shall

be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill

and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled

by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Education and the Workforce. After general debate

the bill shall be considered for amendment under the fiveminute rule. The bill shall be considered as read. No amend-
2

•HRES 393 EH

ment shall be in order except those printed in the report of

the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each

amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the

report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the

report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the

time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by

the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to

amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division

of the question in the House or in the Committee of the

Whole. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may:

(1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the

Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any

amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum

time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without intervening business,

provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on the

first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the

conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with

such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening mo-
3

•HRES 393 EH

tion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
exv10w2



 





Exhibit 10.2




Payment of Deferred Compensation




     This Agreement is entered into as of April 2, 2004, by and between ARI
Network Services, Inc. (“ARI”) and the undersigned participant (the
“Participant”) in ARI’s 1999 Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”).



     WHEREAS, effective January 1, 1999, Participant was granted a Salary
Increase (as defined in the Plan), which Salary Increase was required to be
deferred under the Plan until the Payment Date (as defined in the Plan).



     WHEREAS, through March 20, 2004, the aggregate Deferred Amount (as defined
in the Plan) payable by ARI to Participant under the Plan with respect to such
Salary Increase is set forth below the Participant’s signature;



     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of ARI has authorized the payout of the
Deferred Amount, half in cash and half in stock;


     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:



     1. Payouts by ARI. Promptly following the effective date hereof, ARI
shall pay to Participant, in cash, one-half of the Deferred Amount.
Participant agrees to accept, in lieu of cash, and ARI agrees to deliver to
Participant, shares of ARI common stock for the remaining half of the Deferred
Amount. The number of whole shares of stock that ARI shall issue to
Participant shall be one-half of the Deferred Amount divided by the average of
the closing bid and asked prices of ARI common stock on April 2, 2004. ARI
shall pay cash in lieu of fractional shares. Upon such payouts, ARI shall be
released from any further liability or obligation owed to Participant under the
Plan.



     2. Termination of Further Deferrals. Effective with the beginning of the
current pay period, March 21, 2004, the Salary Increase granted to Participant
in 1999 shall no longer be deferred under the Plan and Participant’s cash
compensation will increase as a result.



     3. Investment Representations. Participant represents that he is
acquiring the ARI common stock issued pursuant to paragraph 1 for his own
account for investment purposes only and not with a present intent toward the
public sale or distribution thereof. Participant agrees that the shares may
not be transferred unless such transaction is exempt in ARI’s sole judgement
from registration under applicable federal and state securities laws, and the
certificates representing the shares will bear a customary restrictive legend.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have exercised this Agreement as of
the date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	ARI Network Services, Inc.	 	/s/ John Bray

Participant Signature
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Timothy Sherlock


Timothy Sherlock,

Chief Financial Officer
	 	John Bray

Print Name
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	 	 	$78,288

Deferred Amount
Exhibit 15.2



CONSENT OF EXPERT



I, Karl Swanson, do hereby consent to (i) the filing of the
written disclosure regarding the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report Veris Gold Corp. Jerritt Canyon Property,
Elko County, Nevada” dated July 11, 2013, and the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report Yukon-Nevada
Gold Corp. Ketza River project, Yukon Territory, Canada” dated June 28, 2011, in the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2013, and any amendments thereto (the “Form 20-F”), of Veris Gold Corp. (the “Company”),
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and (ii) the incorporation by reference of such disclosure in the
Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-171775) (the “Form S-8”) filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission.



I also consent to the use of my name in the Form 20-F, and any
amendments thereto, and to the incorporation by reference of the Form 20-F and any amendments thereto, into the Company’s
Form S-8.



|September 11, 2014 | By: | /s/ Karl Swanson             
|------------------ | --- | -----------------------------
|                   |     | Name: Karl Swanson           
|                   |     | Title: Independent Consultant
#### Gary D. SMITH, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

No. 05-3016.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: Nov. 8, 2004.

ORDER

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) and to file the required Statement Concerning- Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7633

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ALPHONSO RAVON MORRISON, a/k/a Ravon, a/k/a Fat Boy,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. 

Voorhees, District Judge. (5:99-cr-00070-RLV-3)

Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 27, 2012

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit 

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alphonso Ravon Morrison, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Alphonso Ravon Morrison appeals the district court’s 

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce 

his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Morrison, No. 5:99-cr00070-RLV-3 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 2012). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

YITZCHOK ROKOWSKY, on behalf of 

himself and all others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

VERICITY, INC., MEMBERS MUTUAL, 

FIDELITY LIFE ASSOCIATION, APEX 

HOLDCO L.P., ERIC RAHE, CALVIN 

DONG, SCOTT PERRY, RICHARD 

HEMMINGS, JAMES E. HOHMANN, 

JAMES SCHACHT, LINDA WALKER 

BYNOE, STEVEN GROOT, JOHN 

FIBIGER, and NEIL ASHE, 

 Defendants. 

 Case No. 1:20-cv-456 

Hon. Andrea R. Wood 

JOINT STATUS REPORT 

 In advance of the status hearing currently scheduled for October 14, 2020, the parties 

respectfully refer the Court to their June 8, 2020 Initial Status Report (Dkt. No. 39; attached as 

Exhibit A). The matters enumerated in that report are still accurate, except that the Motion to 

Dismiss that was not fully briefed as of the date of that report was fully briefed on July 23, 2020. 

Date: October 7, 2020 

By: /s/ Eric S. Mattson

 Counsel for Defendants 

Walter C. Carlson 

Eric S. Mattson 

Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Patrick Howard 

 Counsel for Plaintiff 

SALTZ MONGELUZZI 

 & BENDESKY, P.C. 

Case: 1:20-cv-00456 Document #: 47 Filed: 10/07/20 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:559
2 

Elizabeth Y. Austin 

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 

One South Dearborn 

Chicago, Illinois 60603 

Phone: (312) 853-7000 

wcarlson@sidley.com 

emattson@sidley.com 

laustin@sidley.com

Simon B. Paris 

Patrick Howard 

Charles J. Kocher 

1650 Market Street, 52nd Floor 

Philadelphia, PA 19013 

215.496.8282 

215.496.0999 (fax) 

Sparis@smbb.com 

Phoward@smbb.com 

Ckocher@smbb.com 

WEXLER WALLACE, LLP 

Edward A. Wallace 

Mark R. Miller 

55 W Monroe St 

Suite 3300 

Chicago, IL 60603 

(312) 346-2222 

eaw@wexlerwallace.com 

mrm@wexlerwallace.com 

ROGERS CASTOR 

Lance Rogers 

Daniel J. Mirarchi 

26 E. Athens Ave. 

Ardmore, PA 19003 

610-649-1880 

877-649-1880 (fax) 

Lance@RogercCastor.com 

Dan@RogersCastor.com 

GUSTAFSON GLUEK PLLC 

Daniel E. Gustafson 

Raina Borrelli 

Canadian Pacific Plaza 

120 South Sixth Street, Suite 2600 

Minneapolis, MN 55402 

(612) 333-8844 

DGustafson@gustafsongluek.com 

RBorrelli@gustafsongluek.com 

BONI, ZACK & SNYDER LLC 

Michael J. Boni 

Joshua D. Snyder 

15 St. Asaphs Road 

Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004 

Case: 1:20-cv-00456 Document #: 47 Filed: 10/07/20 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:560
3 

(610) 822-0200 

(610) 822-0206 (fax) 

mboni@bonizack.com 

jsnyder@bonizack.com 

Case: 1:20-cv-00456 Document #: 47 Filed: 10/07/20 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:561
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on October 7, 2020, I caused a copy of the foregoing Joint Status 

Report to be filed via the electronic filing system for the U.S. District Court for the Northern 

District of Illinois, which will send a Notice of Electronic Filing to all attorneys of record. 

/s/ Elizabeth Y. Austin 

Counsel for Defendants 

Case: 1:20-cv-00456 Document #: 47 Filed: 10/07/20 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:562
#### Wm. White, etc., *v.*Jas. Dunn, etc.

Executors and Administrators — Settlement—Former Administrators Should Surrender Assets — Sureties on Bond Not Liable to Administrator de Bonis Non But to Heirs and Creditors.

In a suit by an administrator de bonis non against a former administrator tbe court should compel ¡him to surrender all the choses in action and chattels belonging to the estate in order that the former could enforce payment or make the latter liable for their value, but the sureties cannot be held liable to the administrator de bonis non, while they would be to the heirs and creditors.

*234APPEAL PROM BALLARD CIRCUIT COURT.

March 1, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

This equitable suit was brought by appellants as administrators *de bonis non*against Dunn, etc., the removed administrators of one Hammond’s deceased, and in 'their petition it is alleged that the former administrators made a partial settlement of their fiducial accounts in which they reported a note on Wiley Taylor for $1,600 and other notes and accounts of smaller amounts on other persons, all of which were part of the estate of said decedent and were uncollected by them, and claimed a credit therefor. But that they failed to file said notes and evidence of debts as aforesaid, and that plaintiffs as administrators *de bonis non*were unable to reduce said notes, etc., to their possession so that they, could enforce payment of the debtors, and they pray that said’ appellees be compelled to surrender the same to them, or to account for the amount.

To this petition a demurrer was filed by appellee Dunn and his demurrer sustained, and the plaintiffs below have brought the case to this court.

Certainly these dioses in action, according to the allegations’ of the petition, were chattels of the intestate unadministered, and may have been assets in the hands of the administrators *de bonis non,*and that by the demurrer is admitted.

The former administrators had not made said debts their own by charging themselves with .the amount thereof — and in said settlement of their accounts as administrators as aforesaid, they had claimed credits for them because they were unadministered —and according to the doctrine settled by this court, in *Saffron's Administrator v. Kennedy, 7 J. J. Mar.*188; *Williams et al. v. Collins et al.,*1 *Ben. Mon.*58, and in the more recent case of *Burnes, etc., v. Roulac's Administrator, 2 Bush*39; *Marryman v. Trunnell,*3 *Met.*147; appellants might prosecute this suit in equity against the former administrators to make them surrender said claims or to make them liable - for their respective amounts, and the administrators were responsible, but” the sureties are not re*235sponsible to the administrators *de bonis*non, while they would be to his heirs and creditors.

*W. G. Bullitt, for appellants.*

*E. J. Bullitt, for appellees.*

Wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to overrule the demurrer, and to permit the amended petition to 'be filed and for further proceedings consistent herewith.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03758

Honorable Thomas M. Durkin

Long Leaf Trading Group, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, September 24, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Off the record summary

judgment conference held by telephone on 9/24/2021. CFTC's motion for summary

judgment is due 11/5/2021. Defendants' responses are due 12/17/2021. CFTC's reply is

due 1/7/2022. Mailed notice. (ecw, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 74 Filed: 09/24/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:581
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 212 (Monday, November 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 65215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26056]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Delegation of Authority

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and 
Response, Department of Health and Human Services.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice is hereby given that I have delegated heads of an Operating 
Division or Staff Division that implement programs authorized under the 
Public Health Service (PHS) Act, the authorities vested in the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services under Sections 319(e) of PHS 
Act, as amended.
    The authorities in section 319(e) of the PHS Act may be re-
delegated as needed. These authorities shall be exercised in 
coordination with the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and 
Response. These authorities shall be exercised under the Department's 
policy on regulations and the existing delegation of authority to 
approve and issue regulations.
    I hereby affirm and ratify any actions taken by heads of an 
Operating Division or Staff Division that implement programs authorized 
under the Public Health Service (PHS) Act, that involved the exercise 
of the authorities delegated herein prior to the effective date of this 
delegation.
    This delegation is effective immediately.

    Dated: October 24, 2014.
Sylvia M. Burwell,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2014-26056 Filed 10-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-37-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Emanuel N. Hilario, Chief Financial Officer, in connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of McCormick & Schmicks Seafood Restaurants, Inc. for the annual period ended December 30, 2006 (the Report), hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of McCormick & Schmicks Seafood Restaurants, Inc.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/    EMANUEL N. HILARIO
|Emanuel N. Hilario       
|Chief Financial Officer  
|Dated: March 9, 2007
#### John L. Brown v. Commonwealth.

Intoxicating Liquors — Local Option — License Discretion of County Court.

The granting of license to retail spirituous liquor is within the discretion of the county court, notwithstanding there has been a vote of the people on that question.

APPEAL FROM BOYD CIRCUIT COURT.

September 12, 1871.

*251
      *Roe, for appellant.*

*Attorney General, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Hardin :

No valid objection is perceived to 'the constitutionality of the act of the legislature for determining the right to vend liquors in Catlettsburg by a vote of the people of the town, but if it be concluded that that vote should not alone have controlled the action of the county court, there does not appear to have been any abuse of the discretion of the court in refusing to> grant the appellant license to retail liquors.

Therefore the judgment is affirmed.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Astronaut Available for Interviews Before First Space Mission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"N0zk7CGfNf\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-astronaut-available-for-interviews-before-first-space-mission\/\">NASA Astronaut Available for Interviews Before First Space Mission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-astronaut-available-for-interviews-before-first-space-mission\/embed\/#?secret=N0zk7CGfNf\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Astronaut Available for Interviews Before First Space Mission” — NASA\" data-secret=\"N0zk7CGfNf\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/27783264737_d59c02ba87_k.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}