alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2004-5
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-5


      The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

      (i)    A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
          preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master
          Servicer under the Agreement has been made under our supervision;
          and

     (ii)    To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master
          Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
          throughout such year.




/s/ Joseph M. Candelario                          Dated: March 28, 2005
------------------------

JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Mark Wong                                     Dated: March 28, 2005
-------------

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 281

To express support for an interpretive site near Wood River, Illinois, as

the point of departure for the Lewis and Clark Expedition.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 24, 1997

Mr. COSTELLO (for himself, Mr. RUSH, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. EWING, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Mr. HYDE, Mr. WELLER,

Mr. BLAGOJEVICH, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. EVANS, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois,

Mr. HASTERT, Mr. POSHARD, and Mr. YATES) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

RESOLUTION

To express support for an interpretive site near Wood River,

Illinois, as the point of departure for the Lewis and

Clark Expedition.

Whereas President Thomas Jefferson selected Meriwether

Lewis and William Clark to be co-leaders of an expedition

to explore the Missouri and Columbia rivers;

Whereas Lewis and Clark staged their epic journey at the

confluence of the Mississippi and Missouri Rivers in December of 1803;

Whereas they camped for the winter at the mouth of Wood

River, on the Illinois side of the Mississippi, opposite the

entrance to the Missouri River;
2

•HRES 281 IH

Whereas the two captains recruited young woodsmen and enlisted soldiers who volunteered from nearby Army outposts, selecting a roster of approximately 45 men for the

expedition;

Whereas Meriwether Lewis recorded that the mouth of the

Wood River was ‘‘to be considered the point of departure’’ for one of the most important journeys into the

American West; and

Whereas the bicentennial of this monumental expedition will

be observed beginning in 2003: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) expresses its support that the site near

3 Wood River, Illinois, be recognized as the starting

4 point for the Lewis and Clark Expedition;

5 (2) expresses its support for the people of Illi6 nois to properly recognize this site as one of monu7 mental historical impact; and

8 (3) calls upon the President, Secretary of the

9 Interior, Director of the National Park Service,

10 other public officials, and the people of the United

11 States to support and promote this site near Wood

12 River, Illinois, as the starting point for one of the

13 greatest journeys in American history.

Æ
_______________________________________ __ 

### Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



## September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r 

## 136045 Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices 

## PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 136045 COA: 282557 Wayne CC: 03-012730-FH WILLIAM CHARLES MCCULLOCH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 23, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0915 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 22, 2008

Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 06 79 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. REX WILLIAM ALLEN,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 25 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 19 2023

07/19/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0679
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 526

Condemning the launching by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea

of a ballistic missile in violation of Japanese air space, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 10, 1998

Mr. KIM submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Condemning the launching by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea of a ballistic missile in violation of Japanese air space, and for other purposes.

Whereas the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK)

launched a medium range ballistic missile into the Pacific

Ocean on August 31, 1998, in violation of Japanese air

space;

Whereas this act adds considerable tension to an already unstable region of the world;

Whereas this missile launch comes at a time when new South

Korean President Kim Dae Jung is attempting to thaw

relations with the DPRK by implementing his ‘‘Sunshine

Policy’’, which includes his proposal to have Kumgang

Mountain in the DPRK opened up to South Korean tourists;
2

•HRES 526 IH

Whereas official North Korean media criticized Japan for

openly stating its legitimate concern over the missile test;

Whereas the DPRK has openly engaged in the transfer of

significant missile technology to nations such as Iran,

Syria, and Pakistan;

Whereas the United States has acted in good faith with regard to the DPKR and provides more food aid and fuel

oil to the DPRK than any other country;

Whereas some United States food aid has been diverted from

its intended beneficiaries to the armed forces, in clear

violation of agreed upon conditions; and

Whereas appeasement of hostile and irrational undemocratic

regimes has had disastrous consequences in this century:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) condemns the launching by the Democratic

3 People’s Republic of Korea of a medium range bal4 listic missile in violation of Japanese air space and

5 calls upon the President to seriously reevaluate the

6 current policies of the United States toward that

7 country; and

8 (2) urges the President to relay the serious con9 cerns of the House of Representatives to the Demo10 cratic People’s Republic of Korea regarding the mis11 sile launch and the ramifications such missile

12 launches could have on future food and energy as13 sistance to that country.

Æ
**Exhibit 23.1** **Consent    of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm** **Board of Directors****PeopleSupport, Inc.****Los Angeles, California**     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the    Registration Statement on    Form S-8(No. 333-    139404,    333-120150    and    333-115328)    of PeopleSupport, Inc. and the Registration Statement on    Form S-3(No. 333-135560)    of PeopleSupport, Inc. of our reports dated March 16, 2007,    relating to the consolidated financial statements and the    effectiveness of PeopleSupport Inc.’s internal controls    over financial reporting which appears in this Annual Report on    Form 10-K.    We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report    dated March 16, 2007 relating to the financial statement    schedule which appears in this annual report on    Form 10-K. /s/  BDO    Seidman, LLP    BDO Seidman, LLP     Los Angeles, California    March 16, 2007
H. Res. 311

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 10 (legislative day, November 9), 1997.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order to consider in the House a joint resolution

waiving certain enrollment requirements with respect to certain specified bills of the One Hundred Fifth Congress. The

joint resolution shall be considered as read for amendment.

The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the

joint resolution to final passage without intervening motion

except: (1) One hour of debate equally divided and controlled

by the majority leader and the minority leader or their designees; and (2) one motion to commit.

SEC. 2. Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be

in order to consider in the House a joint resolution appointing the day for the convening of the second session of the

One Hundred Fifth Congress. The joint resolution shall be

considered as read for amendment. The previous question

shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution to final

passage without intervening motion except: (1) One hour of

debate equally divided and controlled by the majority leader
2

•HRES 311 EH

and the minority leader or their designees; and (2) one motion to commit.

SEC. 3. The Speaker, the majority leader, and the minority leader may accept resignations and make appointments

to commissions, boards, and committees following the adjournment of the first session sine die as authorized by law

or by the House.

SEC. 4. A resolution providing that a committee of two

Members of the House be appointed to wait upon the President of the United States and inform him that the House of

Representatives has completed its business of the session and

is ready to adjourn, unless the President has some other communication to make to them, is hereby adopted.

SEC. 5. A concurrent resolution providing that the two

Houses of Congress assemble in the Hall of the House of

Representatives on Tuesday, January 27, 1998, at 9 p.m.,

for the purpose of receiving such communication as the President of the United States shall be pleased to make to them

is hereby adopted.

SEC. 6. House Resolution 306 is laid on the table.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 357 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 357

      Waiving clause 2(b) of rule XXII to permit introduction and 
consideration of a joint resolution to designate November of each year 
               as National Child Cancer Awareness Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 1998

   Mr. Forbes (for himself and Mr. Ackerman) submitted the following 
        resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Waiving clause 2(b) of rule XXII to permit introduction and 
consideration of a joint resolution to designate November of each year 
               as National Child Cancer Awareness Month.

    Resolved, That notwithstanding the provisions of clause 2(b) of 
rule XXII, Representative Forbes of New York is hereby authorized to 
introduce, and the House may consider, a joint resolution to designate 
November of each year as National Child Cancer Awareness Month.
                                 <all>
```
Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement, dated July 30, 2000



 Exhibit 10.7 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED COLLABORATIVE 
 RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND MARKETING AGREEMENT 
 BETWEEN MITOTIX, INC. AND 
 DUPONT
PHARMACEUTICALS COMPANY 
  
 This Amendment No. 2, effective July
30, 2000 (the “Effective Date”) is an amendment to the Collaborative Research, Development and Marketing Agreement dated as of December 6, 1995, as amended and restated as of June 2, 1997, and as amended by Amendment No. 1 effective April
3, 2000 (collectively the “Agreement”) between GPC Biotech Inc. (formerly Mitotix, Inc.), a Delaware corporation having its principal place of business at One Kendall Square, Building 600, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 (“GPC”)
and DuPont Pharmaceuticals Company, a Delaware general partnership having its principal place of business at 974 Centre Road, Wilmington, Delaware 19807 (“DPC”). 
  
 WHEREAS, GPC and DPC desire to amend the Agreement to extend the time for certain actions; 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth in this
Amendment No. 2, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 
  
 In Section 4.1 of Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Collaborative Research, Development and Marketing Agreement between Mitotix, Inc. and DPC,
the last sentence of the first paragraph shall be amended to read as follows: “The parties agree to complete the selection process no later than by September 30, 2000.” 
  
 In all other respects, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, unless further amended by written agreement by the parties.

  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment, No.
2 effective the date and year first written above.  
  

									
	GPC Biotech Inc.	 	 	 	DuPont Pharmaceuticals Company
					
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Muzammil M. Mansuri
	 	 	 	 By:
	 	 /s/ David Block

	 	 	 Muzammil M. Mansuri, Ph.D.
	 	 	 	 	 	 David Block

					
	 Title:
	 	 Executive VP, Research
	 	 	 	 Title:
	 	 Vice President

					
	 Date:
	 	 	 	 	 	 Date:
	 	 

  

 1
No. 14,665.

#### Wiley, Trustee, v. Coovert.

*Appeal.*— Errors *Not Affecting Appellant*Unavailable.— *Mechanic’s*Lien.— Where a judgment foreclosing a mechanic’s lien is rendered against two persons and only one appeals, an objection by such appellant that his co-party had no interest in the property is not available for a reversal of the judgment.

From the Grant Circuit Court.

— *Brownlee, W. H. Oarroll*and *F. W. Swezey,*for appellant.

— *Brownlee*and — *Royse,*for appellee.

Elliott, J.

The appellee brought this suit to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, and the appellant was made a party to the suit to answer as to his interest in the property. The notice was directed against Maggert, and a decree was entered foreclosing the lien. The appellant, Wiley, alone appeals, for Maggert does not join in the appeal.

*560Filed April 4, 1891.

It is suggested, rather than asserted by appellant’s counsel, that as there is no evidence that Maggert was the owner this suit must fail. We think that the appellant can not successfully make that point. The appellant has a right to avail himself of all material errors that affect him, but he can not avail himself of errors affecting another party. It is not shown that he was in any wise affected by the alleged failure to prove Maggert’s ownership.

Judgment affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosures controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: April 24, 2007/s/ Eric W. FinlaysonEric W. FinlaysonSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the
Annual Report of Otelco Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Curtis L. Garner, Jr., Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:  1.The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and  2.The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.   /s/
  Curtis L. Garner, Jr.Curtis
  L. Garner, Jr.Chief
  Financial OfficerMarch 31,
  2005   A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Opinion filed June 16, 2011

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-11-00075-CV

__________

CHAD MURRAY, Appellant

V.

KAREN CHAVANA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 259th District Court

Jones County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 021733

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On April 21, 2011, this court entered an order abating the appeal pending receipt of 

findings from the trial court regarding the date that appellant, Chad Murray, first received notice 

or acquired actual knowledge of the trial court’s judgment. In the interim, the trial court has 

entered a nunc pro tunc judgment that effectively renders the appeal moot. In this regard, 

appellant has now forwarded a motion to dismiss the appeal based upon the nunc pro tunc 

judgment. Specifically, appellant states in the motion that, “[o]n June 13, 2011, the trial court 

signed an order nunc pro tunc which replaced the January 31, 2011 order awarding attorney fees’

and resolved the issue of attorney fees’ complained of in this appeal. . . . Appellant requests the 
2

court to dismiss his appeal.” Accordingly, the appeal is reinstated and appellant’s motion to 

dismiss is deemed filed. In accordance with appellant’s request, we dismiss the appeal pursuant 

to TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

June 16, 2011

Panel1consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Hill, J.2

 

1

Rick Strange, Justice, resigned effective April 17, 2011. The justice position is vacant pending appointment of a 

successor by the governor.

2

John G. Hill, Former Justice, Court of Appeals, 2nd District of Texas at Fort Worth, sitting by assignment.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-31058 Summary Calendar

ELI J. GUILLORY, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus BURL CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-2342

- - - - - - - - - - March 30, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Eli J. Guillory, Louisiana state prisoner #89473, moves for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP). Although we initially granted Guillory leave to file his successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application in district court, we have since held that his claim of an unconstitutional jury instruction on reasonable doubt does not meet the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2)(A). See in re Smith , 142 F.3d 832, 834-36 (5th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED. Guillory’s IFP motion is DENIED as moot.
** **

**Exhibit 15.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-171775) of Veris Gold Corp. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) of our report datedApril 14, 2014 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company (which report expresses an unqualified opinionand includes emphasis of matter paragraphs referring to the existence of conditions that cast substantial doubt about the Company’sability to continue as a going concern and uncertainty related to the outcome of the negotiations to settle a forward contract)appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

/s/ Deloitte LLP

 

Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada

 September 11, 2014
IV

House Calendar No. 75

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 201

[Report No. 105–216]

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to consideration

of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 29, 1997

Mr. SOLOMON, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect

to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the

Committee on Rules.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 4(b) of rule

2 XI for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to

4 the House is waived with respect to the following meas5 ures:

6 (1) Any resolution reported before August 3,

7 1997, providing for consideration or disposition of
2

HRES 201 RH

1 the bill (H.R. 2015) to provide for reconciliation

2 pursuant to subsections (b)(1) and (c) of section 105

3 of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal

4 year 1998, an amendment thereto, a conference re5 port thereon, or an amendment reported in disagree6 ment from a conference thereon.

7 (2) Any resolution reported after July 30,

8 1997, and before August 3, 1997, providing for con9 sideration or disposition of the bill (H.R. 2014) to

10 provide for reconciliation pursuant to subsections

11 (b)(2) and (d) of section 105 of the concurrent reso12 lution on the budget for fiscal year 1998, an amend13 ment thereto, a conference report thereon, or an

14 amendment reported in disagreement from a con15 ference thereon.

House Calendar No. 75

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 201

[Report No. 105–216]

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI

tions reported from the Committee on Rules.with respect to consideration of certain resoluJULY 29, 1997

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed