alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
9193.

#### GOODWIN *v.*BICKERS.

There was evidence to support the ordinary’s judgment refusing to order tlie obstructions removed from the alleged private way; and no error of law appears.

Decided March 12, 1918.

Certiorari; from Greene superior court—Judge Park. August 1, 1917.

*A. G. Brown, J. G. Faust,*for plaintiff.

*Noel P. Parle,*for defendant.

Harwell, J.

This was a proceeding before the ordinary of Greene County, brought by Miss Abbie Goodwin against D’. H. Bickers, to remove obstructions from a private way leading to the rear of her lot in Greensboro. The evidence was rather volumñ nous, and it would serve no good purpose to attempt to set it out at length. She claimed the right to the way under section 824 of the Civil Code of 1910, alleging that it had been in constant and uninterrupted use for more than seven years, and that no legal steps had been taken to abolish it. She claimed a prescriptive right to the way by the uninterrupted use of it by her tenant and the tenant of her predecessor in title, for more than seven years, and by the keeping of it in repair during that time. The ordinary refused to remove the obstruction's. She carried the case by certiorari to the superior court; the trial judge overruled the certiorari, and she excepts.

*14The burden was on the'plaintiff to show the constant and unin-' terrupted use of the .way for seven years or longer, and that it had been kept in repair during that time. The evidence was conflicting; and the ordinary, after personally inspecting the premises, determined the issue against the plaintiff. It appears that she can lay out over her own lot a way to her barn, without the use of this way, which is over the property of others, and for which no compensation has been paid. The judge of the superior court carefully reviewed the judgment of the ordinary, writing an-opinion of some .length, and citing in support of his opinion the following cases: *Forrester*v. *McKaig,*144 *Ga.*702 (87 S. E. 1060); Carlton v. *Seaboard Air-Line Ry.,*143 *Ga.*516 (85 S. E. 863, Ann. Cas. 1917A, 497); *Johnson*v. *Sams,*136 *Ga.*448 (71 S. E. 891); *Nashville &c. Ry.*v. *Coats,*133 *Ga.*820 (66 S. E. 1085); *Gardner*v. *Swann,*114 *Ga.*304 (40 S. E. 271); *Chattanooga &c. Ry. Co.*v. *Philpot,*112 *Ga.*153 (37 S. E. 181); *Wade*v. *Johnson,*94 *Ga.*349 (21 S. E. 569); *Cook*v. *Gammon,*93 *Ga.*298 (20 S. E. 332); *Cunningham*v. *Elliott,*92 *Ga.*159 (18 S. E. 365); *Herndon*v. *Strickland,*86 *Ga.*323 (12 S. E. 642); *Russell*v. *Napier,*82 *Ga.*770 (9 S. E. 746); *Collier*v. *Farr,*81 *Ga.*749 (7 S. E. 860); *Woolbright*v. *Cureton,*76 *Ga.*107; *Nott v. Tinley,*69 *Ga.*766; *Childers*v. *Holoway,*69 *Ga.*758; *Puryear*v. *Clements, 53 Ga.*232.

We have carefully gone through the record and the briefs, and we see no reason to interfere; and the judgment overruling the certiorari is

*Affirmed.*

*Broyles,'’ P. J. and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                        0
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                           840,056
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                             211,371
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      1,061,427
<PP&E>                                  247,166
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        1,522,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 1,937,065
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  2,344
<OTHER-SE>                             (517,223)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          1,522,186
<SALES>                               1,914,924
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      1,914,924
<CGS>                                   648,375
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         1,236,496
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       (258,018)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     (258,018)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (227,965)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (227,965)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                           (227,965)
<EPS-BASIC>                             (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.10)


</TABLE>
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 357

Waiving clause 2(b) of rule XXII to permit introduction and consideration

of a joint resolution to designate November of each year as National

Child Cancer Awareness Month.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 11, 1998

Mr. FORBES (for himself and Mr. ACKERMAN) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Waiving clause 2(b) of rule XXII to permit introduction

and consideration of a joint resolution to designate November of each year as National Child Cancer Awareness

Month.

1 Resolved, That notwithstanding the provisions of

2 clause 2(b) of rule XXII, Representative Forbes of New

3 York is hereby authorized to introduce, and the House

4 may consider, a joint resolution to designate November of

5 each year as National Child Cancer Awareness Month.

Æ
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 31

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Andrew J. Cederoth, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
    containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
    included in the year covered by this annual report of Navistar Financial
    2001-A Owner Trust;

2.  Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
    does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
    material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
    circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of
    the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
    required to be provided to the trustee by the Servicer under the
    pooling and servicing agreement, for inclusion in these reports, is
    included in these reports;

4.  Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included in
    the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance with
    the terms of the pooling and servicing agreement, and except as disclosed in
    the reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that
    agreement; and

5.  The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
    Servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
    the report provided by an independent public accountant,  after
    conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
    Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
    Pooling and Servicing Agreement, that is included in these reports.

6.    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Owner
     Trustee.


By: /s/ ANDREW J. CEDEROTH
Andrew J. Cederoth
Vice President and Treasurer
Navistar Financial Corporation
January 31, 2005
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Annual Report of Eagle Hospitality Properties Trust, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. William Blackham, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/S/    J. WILLIAM
BLACKHAM           
|J. William Blackham                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer

February 21, 2007
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



In connection with the Annual Report of Eagle Hospitality Properties Trust, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, J. William Blackham, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/S/    J. WILLIAM
BLACKHAM           
|J. William Blackham                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|March 28, 2005
#### Polly Daniel's Devisees *v.*Henry Daniel.

Husband and Wife — Separate Estate — Power to Dispose of By Will.

A wife may dispose of her separate estate secured to her by an antenuptial contract when she reserves the right so to do.

Reports — Unreported Opinions as Authority.

The case of Bryan vs. Bohannon is regarded as authority, although it was not published in the reports of the decisions of. the court of appeals.

APPEAL FROM MONTGOMERY CIRCUIT COURT.

December 21, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

A careful examination of the authorities cited in the petition of appellants for a rehearing, has not satisfied us that the opinion of the court is not in perfect accord with the law of the case. We do not decide that the wife may not dispose of by last will and testament, the property secured to her separate use by ante-nuptial contract, when she reserves the right to do so. It is not necessary that all should express an opinion upon this subject. Mrs. Daniel did not reserve to herself such right in her contract with appellee. The legislature saw proper when the Revised Statutes was adopted to specify the character of separate estate a married woman might dispose of by will. The express grant of power over estates of this kind acquired by deed or devise, excludes the idea that such power exists over the same kind of estates acquired in other modes.

The common-law rule must yield to the statutory limitation.

We regard the case of *Bryan v. Bohannon*as authority although it was not published in the reports of the decisions of this court. The cases cited do not satisfy us that Mrs. Daniel took a separate estate in the property devised to her by her first husband, Cravens, nor do they conflict with the rule of law as announced in our opinion.

We cheerfully concur with counsel that the draftsman of the will, Mr. Fanón, was an accomplished lawyer, and was not likely to use unusual or unnecessary words in passing to Mrs. Daniel the fee simple title to the property devised, but we are also sat*677isfied that he understood the character of language necessary to be used in creating a separate estate, and feel assured that if such had been the intention of the testator, apt words for that purpose would have been used and nothing left for construction.

The petition for rehearing must be *overruled.*
H. Res. 127

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 24, 1997.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 1274) to authorize appropriations for the National Institute of Standards and Technology for fiscal years

1998 and 1999, and for other purposes. The first reading of

the bill shall be dispensed with. Points of order against consideration of the bill for failure to comply with clause 2(l)(6)

of rule XI are waived. General debate shall be confined to the

bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the

Committee on Science. After general debate the bill shall be

considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall

be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of

amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the

nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on

Science now printed in the bill. Each section of the committee
2

•HRES 127 EH

amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered

as read. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the

Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority

in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering

an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of

the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in

clause 6 of rule XXIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill

for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill

to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House

on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole

to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of

a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cr−00299

Honorable Robert M. Dow Jr.

Hardy Lee Browner

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, August 13, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. as to Hardy Lee

Browner: The status hearing set for 8/14/2020 at 9:45 a.m. will proceed so that the Court

can set a date for the pre−trial conference and a date for a further status hearing. The

call−in information for the 8/14/2020 hearing is as follows: Please use the Court's

toll−free call−in number 877−336−1829, conference access code is 6963747. Mailed

notice (cdh, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cr-00299 Document #: 29 Filed: 08/13/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:103
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Webster Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the Form 10-Q Report of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

August 13, 2007



/s/ William T. BromageWilliam T. BromagePresident(Principal Executive Officer)


Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, this certification
is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 1 5

- 00 462

- CV

POST OAK LANE TOWNHOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION , Appellant
V. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON F/K/A THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF CWABS SERIES 2003

- BC1

AND WADE RINER, INDIVIDUALLY , Appellee s Appeal from the 11 th District Court of Harris County (Tr. Ct. No. 2013

- 00567 )

After due consideration, the Court grants the motion to dismiss this appeal filed by the appellant, Post Oak Lane Townhome Owners Association

. It is therefore CONSIDERED , ADJUDGED , and ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed

. It is further ORDERED that appellant pay all costs incurred by reason of this appeal.
It is further ORDERED that this decision be certified below for observance. Judgment rendered July 28 , 201 5

. Judgment rendered by pan el consisting of Chief Justice s Radack and Justices Higley and Massengale

.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Jay M. Short, Ph.D., the Chief Executive Officer of Diversa
Corporation (the Company), and Karin Eastham, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:



1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as
Exhibit 32 (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company
at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.



Dated: May 6, 2004



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ JAY M. SHORT        |  | /s/ KARIN EASTHAM      
|Jay M. Short, Ph.D.     |  | Karin Eastham          
|Chief Executive Officer |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided by Diversa Corporation and will be retained by Diversa Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             593
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      542
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        328
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,854
<PP&E>                                          18,006
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,030
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,931
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,849
<SALES>                                         28,620
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,620
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,891
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 307
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,499
<INCOME-TAX>                                       534
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,965
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (74)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,891
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 278 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 28, 1997.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 1119) to authorize 
appropriations for fiscal year 1998 for military activities of the Department of 
Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department 
of Energy, to prescribe personnel strengths for such fiscal year for the Armed 
Forces, and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference 
report and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be 
considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```