alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Orville’s Flight Log","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"jmInayPdIZ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/orvilles-flight-log\/\">Orville’s Flight Log<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/orvilles-flight-log\/embed\/#?secret=jmInayPdIZ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Orville’s Flight Log” — NASA\" data-secret=\"jmInayPdIZ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/orville-flight-log.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-11-0000375 28-MAR-2014 11:54 AM
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lee Mohon","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lee-a-mohonnasa-gov\/","title":"NASA, Partners Test 3D Printed Rocket Pad Designed by Artemis Generation Students","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"GaaFu3KHfb\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/technology\/manufacturing-materials-3-d-printing\/nasa-partners-test-3d-printed-rocket-pad-designed-by-artemis-generation-students\/\">NASA, Partners Test 3D Printed Rocket Pad Designed by Artemis Generation Students<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/technology\/manufacturing-materials-3-d-printing\/nasa-partners-test-3d-printed-rocket-pad-designed-by-artemis-generation-students\/embed\/#?secret=GaaFu3KHfb\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA, Partners Test 3D Printed Rocket Pad Designed by Artemis Generation Students” — NASA\" data-secret=\"GaaFu3KHfb\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/rocket_pad_1smaller.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
EXHIBIT  15.27

 

 

 

May 7, 2007

 

Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc.

5330 East 31st Street

Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135

 

We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financial information of Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. and subsidiaries for the periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, as indicated in our report dated May 7, 2007; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

 

We are aware that our report referred to above, whichis included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, is incorporated by reference in RegistrationStatements No. 333-79603, No. 333-89189, No. 333-33144, No. 333-33146, No. 333-50800, No. 333-128714, and No. 333-136611 on Form S-8.

 

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuantto Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by anaccountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

 

/s/  DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Tulsa, Oklahoma
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 23, 2009 

d0615 

Order 

 

June 23, 2009 

138117 

PATRICIA CROZIER, Guardian of LAWRENCE 

CROZIER, a Legally Incapacitated Person, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138117 

 COA: 279924 

St. Clair CC: 07-001309-NO 

HENRY FORD HOSPITAL, also known as 

HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM, 

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

JOHN DOE and RON ROE, 

Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 11, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Nelson *v.*Hinesley, in Error.

THE parties in this case agreed, in *March,*1833, by a writing under seal, that certain matters in difference between them .should be referred to arbitrators; that the parties should, at their peril, take notice of the time and place of the meeting of the-arbitrators; that the award should be made a, rule of the *Marion*Circuit Court; and that judgment should be entered on the award, if against *Kelson,*at the next term of the Court.

, In *May,*1833, the arbitrators filed in the clerk’s office, the agreement of submission, -and their a.ward against *Kelson*for 50 dollars with costs. At the *September*term of the Court, *Hinesley*appeared; *Kelson*made default; and judgment was rendered on the award.

*Held,*that previously to the rendition of judgment in this case, the award should have been recorded, and a rule taken and served on *Kelson,*to show cause why the award should not be made the judgment of the Court; and that as these previous steps had been omitted, the judgment was erroneous.

C. *Fletcher,*for the plaintiff.

J. *B. Ray*and *J. Eccles,*for the defendant.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

Wordlaw,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

Enterprise Leasing Company of Chicago, 

LLC, 

Defendant(s).

Case No. 20-cv-3200

Judge Sara L. Ellis

ORDER

It is hereby ordered that the Executive Committee Order [123] entered reassigning this action to 

Judge Ellis from Judge Shah is vacated, having been entered in error. 

Date: 6/9/2023 /s/ Sara L. Ellis 

Case: 1:20-cv-03200 Document #: 124 Filed: 06/09/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1131
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Sandra M. Watson,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04362-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: February 1, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9923 Filed 02/02/18 Page 1 of 1
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43594

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff

- Respondent

,

v.

MARK M. ALDERS

,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 416

Filed: March 4, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Melissa Moody , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of seven years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years, for one count of possession of methamphetamine, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Andrea W. Reynolds , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

____________________________________________ ____

Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Mark M. Alders pled guilty to one count of possession of methamphetamine , Idaho Code

§ 37

- 2732(c) . The district court imposed a unified sentence of seven years, with three years

determinate

. Alders appeals, contending that his sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our s tandard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez

, 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.2

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Alders ’ judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Section 906 Certification**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR**

**PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connectionwith the accompanying Form 10-Q of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc. for the sixmonths ended June 30, 2004, I, R. Scott Stevenson, Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc., hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) such Form10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2) theinformation contained in such Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2004fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc.

 

This writtenstatement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as anexhibit to such Form 10-Q.

 

 
| August 16,  2004 |   | /s/  R. Scott Stevenson                                            |   |
|------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date             |   | R. Scott  Stevenson  Senior Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.2

Eastern Division

Kevin Dale, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02942

Honorable John F. Kness

NFP Corp., et al.

Defendant.

NOTICE OF MANDATORY INITIAL DISCOVERY

The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key

features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP)

Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all

parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing

Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery

obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1).

Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents

(Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when

the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third−Party Complaint is served.

Case: 1:20-cv-02942 Document #: 7 Filed: 05/19/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:73
### In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06

- 11

- 00 027

- CR

______________________________

WESLEY LEON SPANGLER , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 115th Judicial District Court

Upshur County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15,051

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Wesley Leon Spangler, appellant, has filed with this Court a motion to dismiss his appeal.

The motion is signed by Spangler and his counsel in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas

Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a). As author ized by Rule 42.2, we

grant the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: February 1, 2011

Date Decided: February 2, 2011

Do Not Publish
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel, are you 

a 

 Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this Court’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 U.S.C.§1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on 

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

Case: 1:20-cv-03256 Document #: 11 Filed: 06/17/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:42
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000474 05-APR-2018 09:43 AM
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Naomi Hartono","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/naomi-hartonojpl-nasa-gov\/","title":"NASA\u2019s Trio of Mini Rovers Will Team up to Explore the Moon","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SzWtIl17Ex\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/technology\/robotics\/nasas-trio-of-mini-rovers-will-team-up-to-explore-the-moon\/\">NASA\u2019s Trio of Mini Rovers Will Team up to Explore the Moon<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/technology\/robotics\/nasas-trio-of-mini-rovers-will-team-up-to-explore-the-moon\/embed\/#?secret=SzWtIl17Ex\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA\u2019s Trio of Mini Rovers Will Team up to Explore the Moon” — NASA\" data-secret=\"SzWtIl17Ex\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/e1a-pia25666-cadre-merc-pair-edited-web2.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":337}
#### Ezra L. H. Gardiner, etc., *v.*J. G. Price, etc.

Sale — Cumbersome Property — Place of Delivery.

As a general rule applicable to tbe sale of cumbersome property, the seller’s ordinary place of sale, production or manufacture is the place of delivery.

APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT.

October 17, 1871.

*651
      *Brown, Fox, for appellants.*

*James, Speed, for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Hardin :

Independent of collateral circumstances conducing to show that a delivery of the coal tar at Louisville to the appellants or a common carrier for them, was the delivery intended by the contract, we are satisfied from the context of the written agreement of the parties that the Common Pleas Court properly so construed it.

There is no doubt that as a general rule applicable to the sale of cumbersome property, the seller’s ordinary place of sale, production or manufacture is the place of delivery.

Of course there are exceptions to this rule, as where the parties stipulate differently, or accompanying or surrounding circumstances indicate some other as the place of delivery intended, as was the case in *Branson v. Gleson, 7*Barbour 472, cited by both parties in this case.

But nothing appears in this case to make it an exception to the general rule we have stated. Therefore the judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 216 (Friday, November 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 66371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26485]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies; Correction

    This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 2014-26081) published on 
pages 65213 and 65214 of the issue for Monday, November 3, 2014.
    Under the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City heading, the entry 
for Otten Holdings, LLC and FEO Investments, Inc., is revised to read 
as follows:
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Otten Holdings, LLC and FEO Investments, Inc., both in Norfolk, 
Nebraska; to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of First National 
Agency, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire First Nebraska Bank of 
Wayne, both in Wayne, Nebraska.
    Comments on this application must be received by November 28, 2014.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 4, 
2014.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-26485 Filed 11-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
H. Res. 163

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 12, 1997.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order to consider in the House the joint resolution

(H.J. Res. 54) proposing an amendment to the Constitution

of the United States authorizing the Congress to prohibit the

physical desecration of the flag of the United States. The

joint resolution shall be considered as read for amendment.

The joint resolution shall be debatable for two hours equally

divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on the Judiciary. The previous

question shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution

to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit. The motion to recommit may include instructions only if offered by the Minority Leader or his designee. If including instructions, the motion to recommit shall
2

•HRES 163 EH

be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by

the proponent and an opponent.

Attest:

Clerk.