alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

SUGARTOWN WORLDWIDE LLC, 

TOMMY BAHAMA GROUP, INC., and

SOUTHERN TIDE, LLC,

Plaintiffs,

v.

FR STORE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 20-cv-03298

Judge Matthew F. Kennelly

Magistrate Judge Sheila M. Finnegan

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL UNDER RULE 41(a)(1)

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs Sugartown 

Worldwide LLC, Tommy Bahama Group, Inc., and Southern Tide, LLC (collectively 

“Plaintiffs”) hereby dismiss this action with prejudice as to the following Defendants:

Defendant Name Line No.

Berina Store 22

Taipingqiao 123

Case: 1:20-cv-03298 Document #: 48 Filed: 08/07/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:3337
2

Dated this 7th day of August 2020. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ RiKaleigh C. Johnson

Amy C. Ziegler

Justin R. Gaudio

RiKaleigh C. Johnson

Abby M. Neu

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500

Chicago, Illinois 60606

312.360.0080 

312.360.9315 (facsimile)

aziegler@gbc.law

jgaudio@gbc.law

rjohnson@gbc.law

aneu@gbc.law

Counsel for Plaintiffs Sugartown Worldwide LLC, 

Tommy Bahama Group, Inc., and Southern Tide, 

LLC

Case: 1:20-cv-03298 Document #: 48 Filed: 08/07/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:3338
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-10627

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GERARDO ALVA-BARBOSA,

Defendant-Appellant

Cons. w/ No. 12-10644

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GERARDO ALVA-BARBOSA, also known as Gerardo Alva, also known as

Gerardo Alva-Barbarosa,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:07-CR-128-1

USDC No. 4:11-CR-150-1

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 18, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 12-10627 Document: 00512277526 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013
No. 12-10627

c/w No. 12-10644

Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

TheFederalPublic Defender appointed to represent Gerardo Alva-Barbosa

(Alva) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Alva has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

counsel’s assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

2

 Case: 12-10627 Document: 00512277526 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/18/2013
#### L. D. Barker *v.*J. C. Compton.

Vendor and Purchaser — Suit to Enforce Purchase Money Lien — Necessary Allegations.

The judgment subjecting the real estate described in the petition was not authorized by the pleadings as there is no allegation in the petition that the appellant had any lien on the property.

As between the vendor and vendee no lien exists unless retained in the deed.

*71APPEAL PROM UNION CIRCUIT COURT.

March 14, 1872.

*Rodman, for appellant.*

*James, for appellee.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge-Pryor:

The judgment subjecting the real estate described in the petition was not authorized by the pleadings. There is no allegation in the petition that the appellant had any lien whatever on the property even for the payment of his debt. The deed that he alleges was the consideration for the execution of the note is not made part of his petition, and no statement by him, express or implied, authorized the court to adjudge that there was a lien retained in. the deed for the payment of the note sued on. As between the vendor and vendee no lien exists unless retained in the deed. The judgment of the court below is reversed and cause remanded with directions (the plaintiff being the purchaser) to set aside the sale and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. The plaintiff ought to be allowed to amend his pleadings.
|                                  |                             |                    |                    |   |
|----------------------------------|-----------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| 621      17TH STREET, SUITE 1550 | DENVER,      COLORADO 80293 | TEL      (303) 623-9147 | FAX      (303) 623-4258 |

|   |                                |
|--------|--------------------------------|
|   |                           |
|   | Ryder      Scott Company, L.P. |

| 1100      LOUISIANA   SUITE 3800 | HOUSTON, TEXAS      77002-5218 | TEL (713)      651-9191 | FAX (713)      651-0849 |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------|
| 1100, 530-8th      AVENUE S.W.             | CALGARY, ALBERTA T2P      3S8  | TEL (403)      262-2799 | FAX (403)      262-2790 |
January 27, 1999


           George Crapple
           Millburn Ridgefield
           1270 Avenue fo the Americas
           New York, New York 10020-1795

           Re:    Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II

           Dear George:

           Please  liquidate  all of  your  positions  in the  above  references
           fund(s)  in an  orderly  fashion  by the  close of  business  Friday,
           January 29, 1999.

           If you have any questions, I can be reached at 212- 723-5416.

           Very truly yours,

           SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT INC.



           Daniel A. Dantuono
           Chief Financial Officer & Director


           DAD/sr
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with Annual Report of Kid Castle
      Educational Corporation, a Florida Corporation (the “Registrant”), on Form 10-Q
      for the fiscal period ending March 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission , the undersigned hereby certifies that:





1.
      To the
      best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      To the
      best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of
      the Registrant.





DATE:
                  April 25,
                  2007
              BY:
              /s/ MIN TAN YANGMIN
                TAN YANGCHIEF
                EXECUTIVE OFFICER





DATE:
                    April 25,
                    2007
                BY:
                /s/ SUANG-YI PAISUANG-YI
                  PAICHIEF
                  FINANCIAL OFFICER
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jason Costa","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jason-p-costanasa-gov\/","title":"Allison Mjoen","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"xq7dmFPUI6\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/kennedy-biographies-mjoen\/\">Allison Mjoen<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/kennedy-biographies-mjoen\/embed\/#?secret=xq7dmFPUI6\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Allison Mjoen” — NASA\" data-secret=\"xq7dmFPUI6\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/allison-mjoen.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":900}
#### J. C. Caldwell *v.*Chas. Baker.

Injunction — Liability on Bond — Dissolution.

Although, the action of trespass might have been maintained by the appellee for the destruction of his corn by the appellant, still this does not. preclude him from Ms action against the appellant for the damages sustained by reason of the injunction. After the dissolution, and not before, the appellee was entitled to gather his corn, but in the meantime it had been gathered by appellant, therefore he was entitled to his corn or the proceeds.

APPEAL PROM HICKMAN CIRCUIT COURT.

September 27, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

Although an action of trespass might have been maintained by the appellee for the destruction of his corn by the appellant, still this does not preclude him from his action against the appellant for the damages he sustained by reason of the injunction.

This injunction was not dissolved until September, 1867, and by it the appellee was restrained from gathering his corn. He had no right to gather it until the dissolution of the injunction, as it was to prevent this act on his part that the injunction was obtained. After its dissolution and not before he was entitled to gather, use and dispose of it, but in the meantime it had been gathered by the appellant or destroyed. The appellant could not maintain his action for damages by reason of the wrongful restraint put upon him by the injunction until its dissolution, and *785when dissolved he was entitled to his corn or the proceeds.

*W. R. Bradley, for appellant.*

*Silvertooth, for appellee.*

The judgment is *affirmed.*
Exhibit 10.1

                         MILLENIUM HOLDING GROUP, INC.
                                 12 Winding Road
                               Henderson, NV 89052
                               Tel: (702) 492-7721
                               Fax: (702) 492-7728


June 4, 2004

Mark Anderson
Camden Holdings, Inc.
9595 Wilshire Boulevard, #510
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Via US Mail;
Via Fax: 310 275-7095; and
Via e-mail: summittmar@aol.com and camdenholdings@aol.com

RE:  Cancellations of Consulting Agreement, U.S. Probe Agreement and Return of
     Stock

Dear Sir:

This letter is your notice that Millenium Holding Group, Inc. is canceling the
Consulting Agreement between our companies dated November 18th, 2003 and demands
the return of 505,051 shares of free trading common stock of the Company
evidenced by certificate 7686. You have failed to perform under the terms of the
Agreement in that you have not introduced the Company to acquisition candidates
that had "no negative cash flow, valuation of at least two million dollars, and
no outstanding debt, and no material litigation". Additionally, Millenium is
also canceling the Asset and License Purchase Agreement executed as of March 29,
2004. U.S. Probe has no value and it does not meet the criteria set forth above.

You have invested $45,000.00 in Millenium and I am causing to have issued 90,000
shares of our common stock restricted pursuant to Rule 144.

It is not now my intention to discuss the other misrepresentations and false
statements made by you during the past few months or the difficulties your
activities and/or lack of activity have caused Millenium. I will sign a release
upon receipt of the 505,051 common shares. Failure on your part to comply with
the enclosed demand by 5:00 PM PDT on Tuesday June 8, 2004 will leave me no
alternative but to pursue all legal remedies that may be available.

Sincerely,

MILLENIUM HOLDING GROUP, INC.


BY: /s/ Richard L. Ham
   -------------------------
         Richard L. Ham
         President


cc: Carl Ranno, General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 230 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 18, 1997.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
resolution (H. Res. 168) to implement the recommendations of the bipartisan 
House Ethics Reform Task Force. The first reading of the resolution shall be 
dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the resolution and shall not 
exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by Representative Livingston of 
Louisiana and Representative Cardin of Maryland or their designees. After 
general debate the resolution shall be considered for amendment under the five-
minute rule. The resolution shall be considered as read. No amendment shall be 
in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution. Each amendment may be considered only in the order 
printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, 
shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the 
report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall 
not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division 
of the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. At the conclusion 
of consideration of the resolution for amendment the Committee shall rise and 
report the resolution to the House with such amendments as may have been 
adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the resolution 
and amendments thereto to final adoption without intervening motion or demand 
for division of the question except one motion to recommit.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

CF Entertainment, Inc.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02393

Honorable Steven C. Seeger

The Nielsen Company (US), LLC

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, June 17, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Defendant's motion to stay

(Dckt. No. [51]) is hereby granted. Discovery is hereby stayed pending a ruling on the

motion to dismiss. This ruling includes initial disclosures and the Rule 26(f) conference.

Mailed notice. (jjr, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
EXHIBIT 32.43

 

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DollarThrifty Automotive Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary L. Paxton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

/s/ Gary L. Paxton

Gary L. Paxton

Chief Executive Officer

August 7, 2007

 

 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. and will be retained by Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

_________________________________________ ) ROLANDO OTERO
, ) ) Plaintiff, ) )

v. ) Civil Action No. 14

- 2004 (BAH) ) DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al.
, ) ) Defendant s

. )

_________________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No.
14]. In its March 27, 2015 Order [ECF No. 16], the Court advised the plaintiff of his obligations

under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Co urt to respond to the
motion, and specifically warned plaintiff that, if he did not respond to the motion by April 30
, 2015, the Court would treat the motion as conceded. The Court extended the plaintiff’s
opposition deadline on several occasions, most re cently to March 1, 201 6

. To date, the plaintiff

neither has fi led an opposition to the motion nor has requested more time to file his opposition

. Furthermore, the plaintiff has not advised the Court of a change of address , and the most rece n t

item sent t o the plaintiff by the Clerk of Court has been returned as undeliverable

.
The Court will deny the defendants’ motion and dismiss this civil action without
prejudice . An Order is issued separately.

DA T E: 4 April 2016 /s/ 

# Beryl A. Howell

BERYL A. HOWELL United States District Judge
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Citizens Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Lark E. Wysham, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Lark E. Wysham
-------------------------------------
Lark E. Wysham
Chief Financial Officer
August 8, 2005
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hill International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Irvin E. Richter, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                                                      
|----- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|By:   |  | /s/    IRVIN E.
RICHTER                              
|      |  | Irvin E. Richter Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|      | 
|Date: |  | March 16, 2009