alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.129


 


AMENDMENT




CALIFORNIACARE
MEDICAL SERVICES AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment to CaliforniaCare Medical
Services Agreement (“Amendment”), is entered into at Woodland Hills, Los
Angeles County, California as of July 1, 1999 by and between Blue Cross of
California and its Affiliates (“BLUE CROSS”) and Prospect Medical Group
(“PARTICIPATING MEDICAL GROUP”).


 


RECITALS


 


A.                                   BLUE CROSS and PARTICIPATING MEDICAL GROUP
have previously entered into a CaliforniaCare Medical Services
Agreement, whereby PARTICIPATING MEDICAL GROUP is designated as a Participating
Medical Group.  The foregoing agreement
and any amendments thereto shall be referred to herein as the “Agreement.” All
capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed
to them in the Agreement.


 


B.                                     The
parties desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED:


 


1.                                       BLUE
CROSS and PARTICIPATING MEDICAL GROUP hereby agree that PARTICIPATING MEDICAL
GROUP Physicians may freely communicate with Members regarding the treatment
options available to them, including medication treatment options, regardless
of benefit coverage limitations


 


Upon acceptance by the parties, this Amendment, as of the date
specified above, shall become a part of the Agreement, and all provisions of
the Agreement not specifically inconsistent herewith shall remain in full force
and effect.


 


 


	
  BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA

  	
  PROSPECT MEDICAL GROUP

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Signature:

  	
  /s/
  Barry Ford

  	
   

  	
  Signature:

  	
   /s/ Peter G. Goll

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Name:

  	
  Barry
  Ford

  	
  Name:

  	
  Peter G. Goll

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Title:

  	
  VP Network Development/Management

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Senior Vice President

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Date:

  	
  6-14-99

  	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
  6-1-99
IV

House Calendar No. 116

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 277

[Report No. 105–342]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 2107) making appropriations for the Department of the Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1998,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 23, 1997

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 2107) making appropriations

for the Department of the Interior and related agencies

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1998, and for

other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 2107) making appropriations for

4 the Department of the Interior and related agencies for

5 the fiscal year ending September 30, 1998, and for other
2

HRES 277 RH

1 purposes. All points of order against the conference report

2 and against its consideration are waived. The conference

3 report shall be considered as read.

House Calendar No. 116

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 277

[Report No. 105–342]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference reSeptember 30, 1998, and for other purposes. and related agencies for the fiscal year ending appropriations for the Department of the Interior port to accompany the bill (H.R. 2107) making

OCTOBER 23, 1997

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 13, 2022

No. 04-22-00116-CR

James STRIBLIN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR4270

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK 

OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on April 13, 2022.

_____________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of April, 2022.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Linda Verboom Curry, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03088

Honorable Gary Feinerman

The Boeing Company

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, July 28, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Motion to appear pro hac

vice [28] is granted. Mailed notice.(jlj, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. §1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bridge Technology,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JamesDjen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

| 1.     |   | The Report fully complies with the        requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities        Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                               |
| 2.     |   | The information contained in the Report        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial        condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

|   |   |                   |   |   |   |   |   |                      |
|--------|--------|------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|   |   |                   |   |   |   |   |   |                      |
|   |   | Date: January 16, 2004 |   |   |   |   |   | /s/ James Djen            |
|   |   |                   |   |   |   |   |   |                           |
|   |   |                   |   |   |   |   |   | James Djen                |
|   |   |                   |   |   |   |   |   | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906, an other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.8

Schedule of the Directors, Executive Officers and 5% Stockholders which have entered into Franchise  Agreements or Preliminary Agreements for a Texas Roadhouse Restaurant

As
of December 25, 2007

|                                                                                                         |  | Prelim. Agt. Signed |  | Fran. Agt. Signed |  | Franchise Fee
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------- |  | ----------------- |  | -------------
|BILLINGS, MT
TEXAS ROADHOUSE OF BILLINGS, LLC
6040 DUTCHMANS LANE, SUITE 200
LOUISVILLE, KY 40205        |  | 3/1/2002            |  | 11/3/2003         |  | $            
|BOSSIER CITY, LA
ROADHOUSE OF BOSSIER CITY, LLC
6040 DUTCHMANS LANE, SUITE 200
LOUISVILLE, KY 40205      |  | 3/19/2004           |  | 12/1/2004         |  | $            
|BROWNSVILLE, TX
TEXAS ROADHOUSE OF BROWNSVILLE, LTD.
6040 DUTCHMANS LANE, SUITE 200
LOUISVILLE, KY 40205 |  | 5/14/2002           |  | 2/4/2003          |  | $            
|EVERETT, MA
TEXAS ROADHOUSE OF EVERETT, LLC
6040 DUTCHMANS LANE, SUITE 200
LOUISVILLE, KY 40205          |  | 2/15/2002           |  | 11/21/2002        |  | $            
|FARGO, ND (1)
ROADHOUSE OF FARGO, LLC
6040 DUTCHMANS LANE, SUITE 200
LOUISVILLE, KY 40205                |  | 4/27/2004           |  | 8/25/2006         |  | $            
|FARMINGTON, NM (2)
ROADHOUSE OF FARMINGTON, NM, LLC
6040 DUTCHMANS LANE, SUITE 200
LOUISVILLE, KY 40205  |  | 3/19/2004           |  |                   |  | $            
|LONGMONT, CO
ROADHOUSE OF LONGMONT, LLC
6040 DUTCHMANS LANE, SUITE 200
LOUISVILLE, KY 40205              |  | 12/19/2003          |  | 5/3/2004          |  | $            
|MCKINNEY, TX
ROADHOUSE OF MCKINNEY, LTD.
6040 DUTCHMANS LANE, SUITE 200
LOUISVILLE, KY 40205             |  | 3/16/2004           |  | 9/8/2004          |  | $            
|NEW BERLIN, WI
ROADHOUSE OF NEW BERLIN, LLC
6040 DUTCHMANS LANE, SUITE 200
LOUISVILLE, KY 40205          |  | 3/17/2004           |  | 9/8/2004          |  | $            
|OMAHA, NE
ROADHOUSE OF OMAHA, LLC
6040 DUTCHMANS LANE, SUITE 200
LOUISVILLE, KY 40205                    |  | 3/19/2004           |  | 3/8/2005          |  | $            

---



|PORT ARTHUR, TX
TEXAS ROADHOUSE OF PORT ARTHUR, LTD.
6040 DUTCHMANS LANE, SUITE 200
LOUISVILLE, KY 40205 |  | 12/15/2003 |  | 12/15/2003 |  | $ | 0
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------- |  | ---------- |  | - | -
|TEMPLE, TX
ROADHOUSE OF TEMPLE, LTD.
6040 DUTCHMANS LANE, SUITE 200
LOUISVILLE, KY 40205                 |  | 3/19/2004  |  | 3/11/2005  |  | $ | 0
|WICHITA, KS
ROADHOUSE OF WICHITA, LLC
6040 DUTCHMANS LANE, SUITE 200
LOUISVILLE, KY 40205                |  | 3/17/2004  |  | 12/1/2004  |  | $ | 0

---

---



QuickLinks
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Bad Weather Again Delays Launch of Japanese Cargo Ship to Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"UpQ2Uw85Oz\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/bad-weather-again-delays-launch-of-japanese-cargo-ship-to-space-station\/\">Bad Weather Again Delays Launch of Japanese Cargo Ship to Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/bad-weather-again-delays-launch-of-japanese-cargo-ship-to-space-station\/embed\/#?secret=UpQ2Uw85Oz\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Bad Weather Again Delays Launch of Japanese Cargo Ship to Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"UpQ2Uw85Oz\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/htv5_0.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":374}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Edward Trinidad

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02996

Honorable Maria Valdez

Andrew M. Saul

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, November 30, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Maria Valdez: Plaintiff's request for reversal

[18] is granted in part, and Defendant's cross−motion for summary judgment [21] is

denied. It is hereby ordered that a judgment be entered reversing the Commissioner's

decision with remand to the agency for further proceedings, pursuant to the fourth

sentence of 42 U.S.C. section 405(g). Civil case terminated. Mailed notice(lp, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02996 Document #: 24 Filed: 11/30/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:669
Exhibit E 

Case 2:15-cv-01856-BSB Document 53-5 Filed 12/30/16 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:15-cv-01856-BSB Document 53-5 Filed 12/30/16 Page 2 of 8
 

1

 All exhibits are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference unless otherwise noted. 

Case 2:15-cv-01856-BSB Document 53-5 Filed 12/30/16 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:15-cv-01856-BSB Document 53-5 Filed 12/30/16 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:15-cv-01856-BSB Document 53-5 Filed 12/30/16 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:15-cv-01856-BSB Document 53-5 Filed 12/30/16 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:15-cv-01856-BSB Document 53-5 Filed 12/30/16 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:15-cv-01856-BSB Document 53-5 Filed 12/30/16 Page 8 of 8
#### Fred D. Oetjen, Respondent, *v.*Whitehead Metal Products Co., Inc., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

January 28, 1926.

Sales — implied warranty — buyer not required to show that salesman had authority impliedly to warrant goods — statute (Pers. Prop. Law, § 96, subd. 1) makes implication available whenever evidence shows buyer had reason to and did rely on seller — damages — error to include cost of making test.

A buyer is not required to show that the salesman making the sale had been authorized by the seller impliedly to warrant the article, since the statute (Pers. Prop. Law, § 96, subd. 1) makes available the implication of an implied warranty whenever the circumstances of a sale are such as to indicate, as a fact, that the buyer had reason to rely upon the “ skill or judgment ” of the seller and did, in fact, rely thereon.

In an action brought upon common-law rescission of a contract of sale, it is error to include as an element of damage the cost plaintiff was put to in making a test of the goods purchased.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District, in favor of plaintiff, after trial by the court without a jury.

*Sullivan & Cromwell [William K. Laws*of counsel], for the appellant.

*Timothy J. Mahoney,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam.

We are of the opinion that the evidence amply authorized the finding made by the learned trial justice that the plaintiff relied upon the “ skill or judgment ” of the defendant seller. (Pers. Prop. Law, § 96, subd. 1, as added by Laws of 1911, chap. 571.) It was contended by the defendant that to avail of the *370implication referred to in subdivision 1 it was incumbent upon the plaintiff to show that the salesman who made the sale had been authorized by the defendant impliedly to warrant. The contention is based upon , what seems to us to be a misconception of the legislative purpose. The statute itself fastens the implication upon the transaction whenever the circumstances are such as to show, as matter of fact, that the buyer had reason to rely upon the judgment or skill of the seller, and that in fact he did so rely. As to the authority of an agent to bind his principal by implied warranties, see Williston on Sales (vol. 2 [2d ed.], § 445a); 2 Corpus Juris, 601; Mechem on Agency (vol. 1 [2d ed.], 883, and cases cited). As any express warranty found by the trial court to have been made was such as did *“*not negative ” the implied warranty referred to (Pers. Prop. Law, § 96, subd. 6, as .added by Laws of 1911, chap. 571), it is unnecessary to decide whether an express warranty was made, and we make no decision upon that subject. The action was, however, not brought for breach, but upon common-law rescission, and it was error to include in the damage award the cost to plaintiff of testing the metal. *(Norton*v. *Dreyfuss,*106 N. Y. 90.)

Judgment modified by reducing it to $549.45, with interest from May 17, 1924, and costs, and as so modified affirmed, without costs of appeal to either party.

All concur; present, Guy, Bijur and Mullan, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 11**

 

COMPUTATION OF PER SHAREEARNINGS

 
| ** **                                                           | ** ** | **Quarter Ended September 30,** | ** ** | **Nine Months Ended September 30,** | ** ** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                           | ** ** | **2005**                             | ** ** | **2004**                                 | ** ** | **2005** | ** ** | **2004** | ** ** |
| Diluted net (loss) income per share:                                 |       |                                 |       |                                     |       |   |   |   |   |
| Net (loss) income to common shareholders                             |       | $                                    | (2,481,000 | )                                        | $          | 891,000 |   | $ | (3,944,000 | ) | $ | (4,882,000 | ) |
|                                                                 |       |                                 |       |                                     |       |   |   |   |   |
| Average number of shares outstanding                                 |       | 7,957,428                            |       | 8,380,173                                |       | 8,089,692 |   | 8,490,376 |   |
| Net effect of dilutive stock options based on  treasury stock method |       | —                               |       | 4,973                                    |       | — |   | — |   |
| Total average shares                                                 |       | 7,957,428                            |       | 8,385,146                                |       | 8,089,692 |   | 8,490,376 |   |
|                                                                 |       |                                 |       |                                     |       |   |   |   |   |
| Diluted net (loss) income per share                                  |       | $                                    | (0.31      | )                                        | $          | 0.11 |   | $ | (0.49 | ) | $ | (0.57 | ) |

 

----
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #14175 and #14176]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of New Mexico (FEMA-4199-DR), dated 10/29/2014. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         09/15/2014 through 09/26/2014.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         10/29/2014. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/29/2014. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/29/2015.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 10/29/2014, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Colfax, Eddy, Lea, Lincoln, Otero, San Miguel, Santa Fe, Sierra. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14175B and for economic injury is 14176B (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2014-26577 Filed 11-7-14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P