alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Danny Baird","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/dsbaird\/","title":"How NASA Transmits Votes From the Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"m06lrc1yYR\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/how-nasa-transmits-votes-from-the-space-station\/\">How NASA Transmits Votes From the Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/how-nasa-transmits-votes-from-the-space-station\/embed\/#?secret=m06lrc1yYR\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“How NASA Transmits Votes From the Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"m06lrc1yYR\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/iss064e000163.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 220 (Friday, November 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 68244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26878]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than December 10, 2014.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Blair Corporation, Omaha, Nebraska; to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Washington 
County Bank, Blair Nebraska.
    2. Danes Incorporated, Omaha, Nebraska; to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Shelby County 
State Bank, Harlan, Iowa.
    3. Red Oak Financial Corporation, Omaha, Nebraska; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Houghton State Bank, Red Oak, Iowa.
    4. York Holdings, Inc., Omaha, Nebraska; to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of York State 
Bank, York, Nebraska.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 7, 
2014.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-26878 Filed 11-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 681 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.681

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven

                                 An Act

 
To designate the United States Post Office building located at 313 East 
   Broadway in Glendale, California, as the ``Carlos J. Moorhead Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office building located at 313 East Broadway 
in Glendale, California, shall be known and designated as the ``Carlos 
J. Moorhead Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Carlos J. Moorhead Post 
Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### H. Y. Gardner *v.*C. S. Greer.

Bills and Notes — Failure of Consideration.

If the note sued on was not given in consideration of the sale of the note on Thomas, hut only for a promised loan of the money expected to he paid hy Thomas, which was never made, there was a failure of consideration; although the defendant may have incurred a liability by laches in not collecting the note on Thomas, such negligence did not render the note of the defendant obligatory if the anticipated consideration failed.

APPEAL PROM WARREN CIRCUIT COURT.

December 20, 1870.

Opinion by

Judge Hardin :

The instruction marked “B,” given on the last trial at the plaintiff’s instance in effect that, although the jury might believe from the evidence that the defendant took the note on Thomas to collect and not as a purchaser as alleged in the answer, yet the jury should find against him on the note given by him, if he failed to use proper diligence, and might thereby have made the debt of Thomas, seems to us to have been misleading and erroneous.

*479
      *Underwood, for appellant.*

*Bates, for appellee.*

If it were true, as alleged in the defense, and there was some evidence conducing to prove, that the note sued on was not given in consideration of a sale of the note on Thomas, but only for a promised loan of the money expected to be paid by Thomas, which was never made, there was a failure of consideration; although the defendant may have incurred a liability by laches in not collecting the note or withholding it, if by so doing loss or injury resulted to the plaintiff, but such neglect did not render the note of the defendant obligatory if the anticipated consideration failed. We perceive no valid objection to the other instructions and rulings of the court, nor does it appear that there was such abuse of the discretion of the court in setting aside the first verdict as to authorize the affirmance of the judgment rendered thereon, and set aside by the court.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial and for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Quesst Mini Poster","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"UrSeJXG6om\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/quesst-mini-poster\/\">Quesst Mini Poster<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/quesst-mini-poster\/embed\/#?secret=UrSeJXG6om\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Quesst Mini Poster” — NASA\" data-secret=\"UrSeJXG6om\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/lbfd-overview3b-e1663782146439.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":448}
#### W. P. Hahn & A. Harris *v.*Ben Figg et al.

Highways — Special Interest — Common Interest — Nuisance—Who May Sue.

One having a common interest in a public highway, which belongs equally to all and in which the party suing has no special or peculiar property, he cannot maintain a suit. An obstruction would he a nuisance common to all.

Highways — Special Damages.

Where a party sustains special damages on account of the obstruction of a highway, the party thus injured may sue in his own name.

*548APPEAL PROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY.

September 9, 1871.

*A. Harris, Caldwell, for appellants.*

*Jas. Harlan, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

At the threshold appellees are confronted with a difficulty which seems insurmountable. They do not show that they have any interest in this road whjch does not belong to every citizen in the community.

In *Bwr & Yeiser v. Stevens, etc.,*1 Bibb 292, it was decided by this court that upon general principles that common interest, which belongs equally to all and in which the parties suing have no special or peculiar property, they cannot maintain a suit.

If a public road or highway has been established over the lands of appellants, a question which is not now properly before us and which we have no authority to decide, and appellants put up fences or dug ditches across the same whereby passengers are prevented from the use of the road, such obstruction would be a nuisance common to all and for which they would be punishable at common law by indictment. If in attempting to pass said highway (if it be one) appellees or either of them had received special damage on account of said obstruction as by the fall of a passenger’s horse or the upsetting of his carriage whereby an. injury was sustained by wounding the passenger, or his horse or the breaking of his carriage, the party thus injured could maintain an action therefor in his own name. But the reason as given in the case, *supra,*why he cannot without special damages maintain an action against such wrongdoer is, that if one could sue, all might, which would be ruinous.

Appellees do not allege and have not shown that they have any exclusive interest in this road, or have sustained any special damage not common to others and, according to the authority cited, they cannot maintain this suit in their names. Wherefore the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Sandra May","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/sandra-b-maynasa-gov\/","title":"Deep Space Communications","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"LyFQ2ph5KB\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/deep-space-communications\/\">Deep Space Communications<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/deep-space-communications\/embed\/#?secret=LyFQ2ph5KB\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Deep Space Communications” — NASA\" data-secret=\"LyFQ2ph5KB\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/PIA10953\/PIA10953~orig.jpg?w=600&h=1119&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1119}
**EXHIBIT 11**

 

COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

 
| ** **                                                           | ** ** | **Quarter Ended March 31,** | ** ** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                           | ** ** | **2005**                         | ** ** | **2004** | ** ** |
| Diluted net  (loss) income per share:                                |       |                             |       |   |   |
| Net (loss)  income to common shareholders                            |       | $                                | (1,555,000 | ) | $ | (1,635,000 | ) |
|                                                                 |       |                             |       |   |   |
| Average  number of shares outstanding                                |       | 8,310,132                        |       | 8,673,950 |   |
| Net effect  of dilutive stock options based on treasury stock method |       | —                           |       | — |   |
| Total  average shares                                                |       | 8,310,132                        |       | 8,673,950 |   |
|                                                                 |       |                             |       |   |   |
| Diluted net  (loss) income per share                                 |       | $                                | (0.19      | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Timberline Resources Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul Dircksen, President, Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: February 15, 2012

| |                                                                                                                                                        
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By:   /s/ Paul Dircksen
_____________________________
Paul Dircksen
President, Chief Executive Officer & Executive Chairman
Principal Executive Officer







The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 12.1



I, Seamus Young, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of:   Logan Resources Ltd.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of

a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the

statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements

were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this

Annual Report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial

information included in this report, fairly present in all material

respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of

the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





Date: October 3, 2005



Seamus Young

Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 4 AND 5 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,353,812
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,982
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,478,314
<PP&E>                                         140,344
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,001
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,634,037
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           74,685
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,128
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,557,224
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,634,037
<SALES>                                         30,989
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,989
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,171,469
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,114,229)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,114,229)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,114,229)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
#### Adams Express Co. *v.*The City of Louisville.

Municipal Corporation — License—Suit for Restitution — Petition—Sufficiency of.

In a suit for the restitution of license wrongfully collected, the petition is bad when it fails to allege that the general council enacted no other ordinance on the same subject, and that it failed to adopt and ratify the' action of the inspector.

APPEAL PROM JEFFERSON COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.

September 23, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Hardin :

Although the petition alleges that the license inspector exacted and received the sum of $500 for license under the ordinance set out in-the petition, it neither alleges that the general counsel enacted no other.: ordinance on the same subject, nor that it did not adopt and ratify the action of -the inspector in putting the Adams Express Company in the first class of such corpora*199tions of which a license for $500 was exacted, and we can not, therefore, presume that the action of the inspectors in granting the license and exacting the fee therefor, of $500, was not substantially and really the action of the general council, done under the law authorizing it to provide for licensing express companies.

*Sachs, for appellant.*

*Fox, for appellee.*

Wherefore, waiving the consideration of the constitutional questions presented in the argument, we are of t'he opinion that the statement of facts made in the petition does not constitute a cause of action for restitution of the license fee, and the demurrer to the petition was properly sustained.

Whérefore the judgment is affirmed.