alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 134

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 30, 1997.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 867) to promote the adoption of children in

foster care. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed

with. Points of order against consideration of the bill for failure to comply with clause 2(l)(6) of rule XI or section 303(a)

or 308(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 are

waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall

not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

Ways and Means. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be

in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of

amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the

nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on

Ways and Means now printed in the bill, modified as speci-
2

•HRES 134 EH

fied in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying

this resolution. Each section of the committee amendment in

the nature of a substitute, as modified, shall be considered

as read. Points of order against the committee amendment in

the nature of a substitute, as modified, for failure to comply

with clause 7 of rule XVI or section 303(a) or 306 of the

Congressional Budget Act of 1974 are waived. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the

basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has

caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional

Record designated for that purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII.

Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. At the

conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with

such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member

may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment

adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute, as modified. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on

the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without in-
3

•HRES 134 EH

tervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Salvatore Presta, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02723

Honorable Rebecca R.

Pallmeyer

Local 1600 Cook County College Teachers

Union, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, March 29, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: Having reviewed the

parties' recent status report, the court continues the stay of this case in effect, and directs

the parties to submit a further written status report or stipulation within 21 days. Notice

mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02723 Document #: 33 Filed: 03/29/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:112
9577.

#### Storey *v.*The State.

Decided May 1, 1918.

Indictment for making intoxicating liquor; from Harris superior court—Judge Howard. February 2, 1918. ■ '

*A. L. JIardy, George 0. Palmer,*for plaintiff in error.

*G. P. McLaughlin, solicitor-general,*contra.

Broyles, P. J.

The evidence, while circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every *reasonable*-hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.*
IV

House Calendar No. 106

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 262

[Report No. 105–312]

Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R.

1122) to amend title 18, United States Code, to ban partial-birth abortions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 1997

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for the consideration of the Senate amendments

to the bill (H.R. 1122) to amend title 18, United States

Code, to ban partial-birth abortions.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill

3 (H.R. 1122) to amend title 18, United States Code, to

4 ban partial-birth abortions, with Senate amendments

5 thereto, and to consider in the House a single motion that

6 the House concur in each of the Senate amendments. The

7 Senate amendments and the motion shall be considered
2

HRES 262 RH

1 as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour equal2 ly divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking mi3 nority member of the Committee on the Judiciary. The

4 previous question shall be considered as ordered on the

5 motion to final adoption without intervening motion or de6 mand for division of the question.

House Calendar No. 106

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 262

[Report No. 105–312]

RESOLUTION

Providing for the consideration of the Senate

abortions.title 18, United States Code, to ban partial-birthamendments to the bill (H.R. 1122) to amend

OCTOBER 7, 1997

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
RECEIVED 5/20/2020

THOMAS G. BRUTON CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

JN

20CV3097

JUDGE COLEMAN

MAGISTRATE JUDGE HARJANI

FILED 7/15/2020

THOMAS G. BRUTON CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

BG



FILED 5/20/2020

THOMAS G. BRUTON CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

JN 20CV3097

JUDGE COLEMAN

MAGISTRATE JUDGE HARJANI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Prinzo & Associates, LLC

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03256

Honorable Gary Feinerman

BMO Harris Bank, N.A., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, June 8, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Initial status hearing set for

8/3/2020 at 9:15 a.m. Initial Status Report shall be filed by 7/27/2020. Please see Judge

Feinerman's web page (http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov) for details on the initial status

hearing and initial Status Report.Mailed notice.(jlj, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03256 Document #: 8 Filed: 06/08/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:39
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

JANUARY 23, 2002 Session

WILLIAM HARWELL PERRY v. RICKI C. CHILDS PERRY

Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Tipton County

No. 16, 505; The Honorable Martha Brasfield, Chancellor

No. W2001-01350-COA-R3-CV - Filed March 21, 2002

Holly Kirby Lillard, J., concurring separately.

I concur with the majority opinion in this case, but write separately to elaborate on my

reasoning regarding the issue raised in the partial dissent in this case.

Tennessee Code Annotated § 36-5-101(d)(2) provides as follows:

An award of rehabilitative, temporary support and maintenance shall remain

in the court’s control for the duration of such award, and may be increased,

decreased, terminated or extended, or otherwise modified, upon a showing of

substantial and material change in circumstance.

Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(2)(2001). The dissent applies this statute to the case at bar, arguing

that the statute would require the wife in this case to show a substantial and material change in

circumstancesin order to receive continued rehabilitative alimony, even where the award is expressly

open-ended and non-final. If this were true, however, the statute could arguably apply to a pendente

lite award of alimony as well. Clearly it would be anomalous to require a showing of a substantial

and material change in circumstances to modify such an award.

One of the purposes of Section 36-5-101 (d)(2) is to establish that the trial court retains

continuing control over an award of rehabilitative alimony. Such a provision is unnecessary in the

case of a non-final order; if the award is not final, the trial court’s continuing control is apparent.

This indicates that Section 36-5-101(d)(2) is intended to apply only to a final award of rehabilitative

alimony, since statutory authority could be necessary to establish that such an award, although final,

remains in the control of the trial court. Requiring a showing of substantial and material change to

modify a final award of rehabilitative alimony is appropriate.

The dissent expresses concern about permitting a trial court to adopt a “wait and see”

approach in awarding rehabilitative alimony. This concern is justified, but on occasion such an

approach is warranted. See Robinette v. Robinette, 726 S.W.2d 524 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986).
Considering all of the circumstances in this case, I do not believe that the trial court abused its

discretion by entering an order on rehabilitative alimony that was non-final. For these reasons, I

concur separately.

 

HOLLY KIRBY LILLARD, J.
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please

2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 

3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated

4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does

5 not include the filing date. 

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

8 Plaintiff-Appellee,

9 v. NO. 30,873

10 RALPH GUTIERREZ,

11 Defendant-Appellant.

12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY

13 Lisa C. Schultz, District Judge

14 Gary K. King, Attorney General

15 Santa Fe, NM

16 for Appellee

17 Chief Public Defender

18 J.K. Theodosia Johnson

19 Santa Fe, NM

20 for Appellant

21 MEMORANDUM OPINION

22 KENNEDY, Judge.

23 Defendant appeals his convictions for aggravated DWI and speeding. We

24 proposed to affirm in a notice of proposed summary disposition, and Defendant filed
2

1 a memorandum in opposition. Having considered the arguments raised by Defendant

2 in his memorandum and remaining unpersuaded, we affirm his convictions. 

3 In his docketing statement, Defendant raised four issues of asserted error. We

4 proposed to affirm on all four in a notice of proposed summary disposition. In his

5 memorandum in opposition, Defendant reasserts all four issues. [MIO 2-7] However,

6 he splits his second issue into two separate issues which requires him to renumber his

7 assertions into five issues. [MIO 3-7] His second issue is now confined to his claim

8 that the district court erred in allowing the State to present the testimony of Officer

9 Garcia that corn nuts are used as a masking agent to evade DWI. [MIO 3-4] His third

10 issue is now confined to his contention that Officer Garcia lacked reasonable

11 suspicion to request Defendant to perform field sobriety tests. [MIO 4-5] Both of

12 these contentions were asserted in Defendant’s docketing statement as part of his

13 second issue and Defendant’s memorandum in opposition does not raise any new

14 concerns or arguments on either issue. [MIO 3-5] Moreover, in his memorandum in

15 opposition, Defendant fails to rebut any of the analysis contained in our notice of

16 proposed summary disposition. [MIO 2-7]

17 Therefore, for the reasons set forth in our notice of proposed summary

18 disposition, we affirm Defendant’s convictions.
3

1 IT IS SO ORDERED.

2 ___________________________________

3 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

4 WE CONCUR:

5 _________________________________

6 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge

7 _________________________________

8 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Robert H. Horner, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

March 4, 1926.

Executors and administrators — commissions — allowance made only upon equity of mortgaged real estate and upon proceeds of sale of stock owned by deceased on margin which actually comes into hands of executors — commissions awarded to executors and trustees in both capacities.

Upon an application by executors for commissions, an allowance can be made only upon the equity of the mortgaged premises and only on the proceeds of the sale of stock owned by the decedent on margin which actually came into the possession of the executors.

A will which directs the payment of debts and legacies and then gives the residue in trust contemplates separate and distinct duties as executors and trustees and commissions should be awarded in both capacities.

Application by executors for commissions.

*773
      *Paul N. Turner,*for the petitioners.

*Murray, Hollaman & Lockwood,*for Richard G. Hollaman.

*Howard A. Butler,*special guardian.

*Ivan E. Maginn,*special guardian.

*Paul Gross,*for Grace B. Sims.

O’Brien, S.

Commissions will be allowed only upon the equity of the mortgaged real estate and only on the proceeds of the sale of stock owned by the deceased on margin which actually came into the hands of the executors. *(Matter of Mercantile Trust Co.,*210 N. Y. 83; *Matter of Wilcox,*N. Y. L. J. April 21, 1922; *Matter of Hunt,*Id. Aug. 29, 1924; *Matter of Falk,*Id. April 8, 1924.) As the will directs the payment of debts and legacies and then gives a residue in trust it contemplates separate duties as executors and trustees and commissions will be allowed in both capacities. Compensation of special guardians fixed. Complete decree accordingly.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

H-D U.S.A., LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

BENYUE OFFICIAL STORE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 20-cv-03151

Judge Matthew F. Kennelly

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole 

STATUS REPORT

Pursuant to this Court’s Order [42], Plaintiff H-D U.S.A., LLC (“Harley-Davidson” or 

“Plaintiff”) submits the following status report.

This Court entered Default and Default Judgment against the defendants identified in 

Schedule A, with the exception of Defendant growsim.com, on August 3, 2020. [54]. Plaintiff and 

Defendant growsim.com are having ongoing settlement negotiations. Plaintiff has made a 

settlement demand.

Dated this 14th day of August 2020. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Justin R. Gaudio

Amy C. Ziegler

Justin R. Gaudio

RiKaleigh C. Johnson

Martin F. Trainor

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500

Chicago, Illinois 60606

312.360.0080 / 312.360.9315 (facsimile)

aziegler@gbc.law

jgaudio@gbc.law

rjohnson@gbc.law

mtrainor@gbc.law

Attorneys for Plaintiff H-D U.S.A., LLC

Case: 1:20-cv-03151 Document #: 56 Filed: 08/14/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:3316
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 14th day of August 2020, I will electronically file the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, I will electronically publish the documents 

on a website and I will send an e-mail to the e-mail addresses identified in Exhibit 3 to the 

Declaration of Adraea M. Brown and any e-mail addresses provided for Defendants by third parties

that includes a link to said website.

/s/ Justin R. Gaudio

Amy C. Ziegler

Justin R. Gaudio

RiKaleigh C. Johnson

Martin F. Trainor

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500

Chicago, Illinois 60606

312.360.0080 / 312.360.9315 (facsimile)

aziegler@gbc.law

jgaudio@gbc.law

rjohnson@gbc.law

mtrainor@gbc.law

Counsel for Plaintiff H-D U.S.A., LLC

Case: 1:20-cv-03151 Document #: 56 Filed: 08/14/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:3317
#### Chas. Bryant, etc., *v.*W. T. Owen, Trustee, etc.

Tenancy in Common — Devise to Husband and Wife — Survivorship.

Where any real estate is devised to husband and wife there is no mutual right to the entirety by survivorship between them; but they shall take as tenants in common, unless a right of survivorship is expressly provided for and the respective moities is subject to curtesy or dower.

February 20, 1872.

APPEAL FROM DAVIESS CIRCUIT COURT.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters :

*Sec.*14, *Art.*4, *Chap.*47, 2 P. *R. S., p.*27, Provides that where any real estate, or slave is conveyed, or devised to husband and wife (unless a right of survivorship is expressly provided for), *34there shall be no mutual right to them entirely by survivorship between them; 'but they shall take as tenants in common, and the respective moities be subject to curtesy, or dower, with all other incidents to such a tenancy.

*G. W. Ray, for appellants.*

*Ozven, for appellee.*

The conveyance to Bryant and wife was made in 1865, and contains no provision for the right of survivorship, consequently under that deed' they took as tenants in common, and Charles Bryant’s portion of the land Was subject to the payment of his debts, and his deed to Stinnett and others was properly adjudged fraudulent as to appellee who was a prior creditor.

Wherefore, the judgment is *affirmed.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Garrett Shea","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/garrett-shea-1nasa-gov\/","title":"SEH 4.0 System Design Processes","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8LK61ULMWC\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/reference\/4-0-system-design-processes\/\">SEH 4.0 System Design Processes<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/reference\/4-0-system-design-processes\/embed\/#?secret=8LK61ULMWC\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“SEH 4.0 System Design Processes” — NASA\" data-secret=\"8LK61ULMWC\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/seh_figure_4-0_1_interrelationships.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":411}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"NASA STEM Virtual Toolkit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"AsfD5ywwMX\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/nasa-stem-virtual-toolkit\/\">NASA STEM Virtual Toolkit<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/nasa-stem-virtual-toolkit\/embed\/#?secret=AsfD5ywwMX\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA STEM Virtual Toolkit” — NASA\" data-secret=\"AsfD5ywwMX\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/stem-illustration.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":459}