alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 212 (Monday, November 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65213-65214]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26081]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company

[[Page 65214]]

Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR 
Part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become 
a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership 
of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding 
company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank 
holding company, including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than November 28, 2014.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Lake Financial Corporation, Baldwin, Michigan; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Lake-
Osceola State Bank, Baldwin, Michigan.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Otten Holdings, LLC and FEO Investments, Inc., to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of First National Agency, Inc., parent of 
First Nebraska Bank of Wayne, both in Wayne, Nebraska.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System October 29, 
2014.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-26081 Filed 10-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
H. Res. 258

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 7, 1997.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 629) to grant the consent of the Congress to

the Texas Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Compact.

The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General

debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one

hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on Commerce.

After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. Each section of the bill shall

be considered as read. During consideration of the bill for

amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole

may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the

Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed

in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for

that purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII. Amendments so print-
2

•HRES 258 EH

ed shall be considered as read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request

for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five

minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without

intervening business, provided that the minimum time for

electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall

be fifteen minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the

bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the

bill to the House with such amendments as may have been

adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered

on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without

intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or

without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
H. Res. 428

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 13, 1998.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 10) to enhance competition in the financial

services industry by providing a prudential framework for the

affiliation of banks, securities firms, and other financial service providers, and for other purposes. The first reading of the

bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour, with 30 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on Banking and

Financial Services and 30 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the

Committee on Commerce. It shall be in order to consider as

an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the fiveminute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute
2

•HRES 428 EH

printed in part 1 of the report of the Committee on Rules

accompanying this resolution. That amendment in the nature

of a substitute shall be considered as read. All points of order

against that amendment in the nature of a substitute are

waived. No amendment to that amendment in the nature of

a substitute shall be in order except those printed in part 2

of the report of the Committee on Rules. Each amendment

may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may

be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall

be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment

except as specified in the report, and shall not be subject to

a demand for division of the question in the House or in the

Committee of the Whole. All points of order against the

amendments printed in the report are waived. The Chairman

of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time

during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole

a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting

on any postponed question that follows another electronic

vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum

time for electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the conclusion of consideration

of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report
3

•HRES 428 EH

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have

been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in

the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of

the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of

a substitute made in order as original text. The previous

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 293 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 293

         Relating to a question of the privileges of the House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 30, 1997

Mr. Condit submitted the following resolution; which failed of adoption

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
         Relating to a question of the privileges of the House.

Whereas Loretta Sanchez was issued a certificate of election as the elected 
        Member of Congress from the 46th District of California and was seated 
        by the U.S. House of Representatives on January 7, 1997;
Whereas a Notice of Contest of Election was filed with the Clerk of the House by 
        Mr. Robert Dornan on December 26, 1996;
Whereas the Task Force on the Contested Election in the 46th District of 
        California met on February 26th, 1997, in Washington, D.C., on April 
        19th, 1997, in Orange County, California, and October 24, 1997, in 
        Washington, D.C.;
Whereas the Committee on House Oversight has issued unprecedented subpoenas to 
        the Immigration and Naturalization Service to compare their records with 
        Orange County voter registration records, the first time in any election 
        in the history of the United States that the Immigration and 
        Naturalization Service has been asked by Congress to verify the 
        citizenship of voters;
Whereas the Immigration and Naturalization Service has complied with the 
        committee's request and, at the committee's request, has been doing a 
        manual check of its paper files and providing worksheets containing 
        supplemental information on that manual check to the Committee on House 
        Oversight for over five months;
Whereas the Committee on House Oversight has after over nine months of review 
        and investigation failed to present credible evidence to change the 
        outcome of the election of Congresswoman Sanchez and is pursuing never-
        ending and unsubstantiated areas of review; and
Whereas the Committee on House Oversight should complete its review of this 
        matter and bring the matter forward for the House of Representatives to 
        vote upon: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That unless the Committee on House Oversight has sooner 
reported a recommendation for its final disposition, the contest in the 
46th District of California is dismissed upon the expiration of October 
31, 1997.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 346 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 346

      Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a 
commemorative postage stamp should be issued in honor of General Lucius 
                                D. Clay.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1998

   Mr. Gingrich (for himself and Mr. Barr of Georgia) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government 
                          Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a 
commemorative postage stamp should be issued in honor of General Lucius 
                                D. Clay.

Whereas General Lucius D. Clay's service to the United States, in peace as well 
        as in war, is an example that is worthy of honor and praise;
Whereas, under the leadership of General Clay from June 26, 1948, to May 12, 
        1949, the United States conducted the Berlin airlift, a military 
        response to the Russian-motivated Berlin blockade that provided the 
        people of West Berlin with the necessary supplies for day-to-day 
        existence;
Whereas his actions throughout the execution of the Berlin airlift delivered a 
        clear message to the Soviets, and his role as the military officer in 
        charge of rebuilding Germany in the months and years following World War 
        II created the foundation of our country's future relationship with the 
        Federal Republic of Germany;
Whereas his role in United States military affairs in Germany illustrated his 
        military strengths as well as his humanitarian efforts to protect all 
        men and women regardless of their military allegiance or ideology;
Whereas, through his impressive military career (which started in the 1930s, 
        when he served as a military engineer), he established himself as a 
        highly competent, willful, and vigorous man with an excellent 
        understanding of the purpose of government; and
Whereas 1998 marks the 50th anniversary of the Berlin airlift, of which General 
        Lucius D. Clay was the principal architect: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) a commemorative postage stamp should be issued by the 
        United States Postal Service in honor of General Lucius D. 
        Clay; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend 
        to the Postmaster General that such a postage stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
Bullet comparisons using 

confocal microscopy

Ashley Chu, David G. Howitt, Stephen A. 

Shaffer and Frederic Tulleners.

University of California, Davis

Forensic Science Graduate Program

Surface Topography Research Group 
dghowitt@ucdavis.edu

100 microns
Confocal Microscopy

Advantages

3D representation and so theoretically invariant to 

specimen placement.

Disadvantages

Not really invariant for bullets because of the curved surface

Low signal to noise 

High resolution instrument, the examiner uses 4X to 6X 

objective we have to use a 20X to 50X objective to get the 

same level of detail, because of the shallow depth of the 

striae.
Image comparison of 10 x 20x and 50x

20x 50x

10x
dghowitt@ucdavis.edu
dghowitt@ucdavis.edu
Rotational shifts and the decrease in signal to noise

0

o

10o

1

o 2

o

4

o

5

o

7

o

3

o
Results of the FFT filter using Mountains 

Map at 50x and 20x

Length = 236 μm Pt = 2.65 μm Scale = 5.00 μm

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 μm

μm

-2.5

-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

Length = 0.588 mm Pt = 13.7 μm Scale = 15.1 μm

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 mm

μm

-10

-9

-8

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5
FFT on rotational images

0

o

3

o

5

o 10o

Raw data from the NIST un-etched standard bullet TDC
The un-etched data after leveling and FFT filtering
Final filtered profile
Raw data from the land impression of a fired bullet
Processed data from the land impression of a fired bullet
After form removal
After FFT filtering
Three land impressions from successive firings
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, G.J. Hart, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Texas Roadhouse, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: February 25, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/G.J. HART                      
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------
|                        |  |     |  | G.J. Hart                         
|                        |  |     |  | President, Chief Executive Officer

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 10.35.1

[LETTERHEAD APPEARS HERE]
*BANK OF SCOTLAND
CORPORATE BANKING                        Corporate Banking (Scotland)
                                         4th Floor
                                         New Uberior House
                                         11 Earl Grey Street
                                         Edinburgh
                                         EH3 9BN
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                       <C>
Strictly Private & Confidential          Telephone: Direct Line:  0131-559-0717
Vernon Brannon, Senior Vice President               Switchboard:  0131-442-7777
HLM Design Inc                                      Fax:          0131-859-0760
Suite 2950
121 West Trade Street                    Email:     chris_solley@bankofscotland.co.uk
Charlotte, NC 28202-5399                 Our Ref:   CORP/03
USA                                      Your ref:

</TABLE>
                                                               18 September 2002


Dear Vernon,

Re: Term Loan dated 15th February 2002 ("the Term Loan") between GA Design
International (Holdings) Limited ("Borrower") and Bank of Scotland ("BoS")

With reference to schedule 4 (Financial Covenants) of the Term Loan agreement.
The purpose of this letter is to confirm that BoS shall review the current suite
of covenants prior to 31st October 2002, and in the meantime, BoS will waive
the Borrowers obligation to comply with the Gearing (clause 1.1). Trade Debtor
Cover (1.2) and Consolidated Interest Cover (1.5) covenant tests, as at 31st
July 2002.

This waiver is for a period of one year and a day and only applies to the
financial covenants and test date noted above, and is provided on the basis that
the Borrower and BoS agree a revised suite of covenants prior to the 31st
October test.

All other rights are reserved under the facility letter as noted above.

I trust that this is in order.



Kind regards


/s/ Chris Solley

Chris Solley
Corporate Banking Manager
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 224

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Secretary

of Agriculture should establish a temporary emergency minimum milk

price that is equitable to all producers nationwide and that provides

price relief to economically distressed milk producers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 9, 1997

Mr. OBEY (for himself, Mr. MCDADE, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. KIND, Mr. JOHNSON

of Wisconsin, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. MASCARA, Mr. SANDLIN, Mr. PETERSON of Pennsylvania, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. BARCIA, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr.

STENHOLM, Mr. STRICKLAND, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mr. WALSH, and Mr.

KLINK) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

the Secretary of Agriculture should establish a temporary

emergency minimum milk price that is equitable to all

producers nationwide and that provides price relief to

economically distressed milk producers.

Whereas the basic formula price for milk established by the

Secretary of Agriculture under Federal milk marketing

orders fell to a 6-year low of $10.70 in May 1997 following months of substantial price volatility and remained at

similarly low levels throughout the summer of 1997;
2

•HRES 224 IH

Whereas the basic formula price for milk announced for each

month since April 1997 has been below the cost of producing milk for milk producers in all regions of the

United States, as calculated by the Department of

Agriculture;

Whereas income losses to milk producers resulting from low

milk prices have imposed economic hardship on milk producers in all regions of the United States;

Whereas lost income to milk producers may create economic

losses to businesses and result in loss of jobs in rural

communities;

Whereas milk producers, rural residents, and agribusinesses

in rural areas have petitioned the Secretary of Agriculture to implement an emergency milk price floor to

provide price relief to milk producers;

Whereas the Secretary of Agriculture has authority under the

Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), reenacted with amendments by the Agricultural Marketing

Agreement Act of 1937, to establish minimum prices paid

to milk producers covered by Federal milk marketing orders; and

Whereas the Secretary of Agriculture has authority under

section 143 of the Agricultural Market Transition Act (7

U.S.C. 7253) to use informal rulemaking to reform Federal milk marketing orders: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the Secretary of Agriculture should im3 mediately use the authority of the Secretary under the Ag4 ricultural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), reen5 acted with amendments by the Agricultural Marketing
3

•HRES 224 IH

1 Agreement Act of 1937, to establish a temporary emer2 gency minimum milk price that—

3 (1) is equitable to all producers nationwide; and

4 (2) provides price relief to economically dis5 tressed milk producers.

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Mark A. Garcia","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/markagarcia\/","title":"Looking Back at the #YearInSpace","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"gW6KkGBVS0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/looking-back-at-the-yearinspace\/\">Looking Back at the #YearInSpace<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/looking-back-at-the-yearinspace\/embed\/#?secret=gW6KkGBVS0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Looking Back at the #YearInSpace” — NASA\" data-secret=\"gW6KkGBVS0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/iss046e015788_720.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":399}