alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 12.1**
**COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**                                   PFGI  Predecessor  VFI   21 weeks  36 weeks  16 weeks          10 Weeks  42 Weeks  52 Weeks   ended  ended  ended          Ended  Ended  Ended   December 26,  July 31,  November 24,  Year Ended July 31,  July 31,  May 22,  July 31, **(In thousands)** 2004  2004  2003  2003  2002  2001  2001  2000 Fixed charges as defined:                                Interest expense $26,260  $26,240  $9,310  $11,592  $14,513  $3,342  $42,163  $52,088 One-third ofnon-cancelable leaserent  499   845   317   1,119   1,473   248   1,329   1,149                                                           Total fixed charges (A)  26,759   27,085   9,627   12,711   15,986   3,590   43,492   53,237                                                           Earnings as defined:                                Pretaxearnings (loss)  (15,281)  (87,070)  (4,580)  13,964   16,112   (8,897)  (50,549)  (40,661)Add fixed charges  26,759   27,085   9,627   12,711   15,986   3,590   43,492   53,237                                                           Earnings and fixedcharges (B)  11,478   (59,985)  5,047   26,675   32,098   (5,307)  (7,057)  12,576                           Ratio of earnings tofixed charges: (B/A) NM(1)  NM(1)  NM(2) 2.10   2.01   NM(2)  NM(3)  NM(3)
(1) PFGI’s earnings for the 21 weeks ended December 26, 2004 and the 36 weeks endedJuly 31, 2004 were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $15.3 million and $87.1million, respectively. (2) The Predecessor’s earnings for the 16 weeks ended November 24, 2003 and the 10weeks ended July 31, 2001 were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $4.6 million and$8.9 million, respectively. (3) VFI’s earnings for the 42 weeks ended May 22, 2001 and 52 weeks ended July 31,2000, were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $50.5 million and $40.7 million,respectively.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, 

INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

AUKUR-US, et al.,

 Defendants,

Case No. 20-cv-03128

Judge John F. Kness

Magistrate Judge Young B. Kim

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL UNDER RULE 41(a)(1)

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Volkswagen 

Group of America, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) hereby dismisses this action with prejudice as to the following 

Defendant:

Defendant Name Line No.

JSAMZ 8

Dated this 7th day of August 2020. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Allyson M. Martin____________

Amy C. Ziegler

Justin R. Gaudio

Allyson M. Martin

Thomas J. Juettner

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500

Chicago, Illinois 60606

312.360.0080 / 312.360.9315 (facsimile)

aziegler@gbc.law

jgaudio@gbc.law

amartin@gbc.law

tjjuettner@gbc.law

Counsel for Plaintiff Volkswagen Group of 

America, Inc. 

Case: 1:20-cv-03128 Document #: 51 Filed: 08/07/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2706
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 213 (Tuesday, November 4, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 65472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26135]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #14169 and #14170]


Nevada Disaster #NV-00031

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Nevada dated 10/28/2014.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 09/08/2014.
    Effective Date: 10/28/2014.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/29/2014.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/28/2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Clark.
Contiguous Counties:
    Nevada: Lincoln, Nye.
    Arizona: Mohave.
    California: Inyo, San Bernardino.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      4.125
  Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      2.063
  Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      6.000
  Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      4.000
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.625
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.625
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit      4.000
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.625
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14169 B 
and for economic injury is 14170 0.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Nevada, 
Arizona, California.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: October 28, 2014.
Maria Contreras-Sweet,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014-26135 Filed 11-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 293

Relating to a question of the privileges of the House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 30, 1997

Mr. CONDIT submitted the following resolution; which failed of adoption

RESOLUTION

Relating to a question of the privileges of the House.

Whereas Loretta Sanchez was issued a certificate of election

as the elected Member of Congress from the 46th District of California and was seated by the U.S. House of

Representatives on January 7, 1997;

Whereas a Notice of Contest of Election was filed with the

Clerk of the House by Mr. Robert Dornan on December

26, 1996;

Whereas the Task Force on the Contested Election in the

46th District of California met on February 26th, 1997,

in Washington, D.C., on April 19th, 1997, in Orange

County, California, and October 24, 1997, in Washington, D.C.;

Whereas the Committee on House Oversight has issued unprecedented subpoenas to the Immigration and Naturalization Service to compare their records with Orange
2

HRES 293 IH

County voter registration records, the first time in any

election in the history of the United States that the Immigration and Naturalization Service has been asked by

Congress to verify the citizenship of voters;

Whereas the Immigration and Naturalization Service has

complied with the committee’s request and, at the committee’s request, has been doing a manual check of its

paper files and providing worksheets containing supplemental information on that manual check to the Committee on House Oversight for over five months;

Whereas the Committee on House Oversight has after over

nine months of review and investigation failed to present

credible evidence to change the outcome of the election of

Congresswoman Sanchez and is pursuing never-ending

and unsubstantiated areas of review; and

Whereas the Committee on House Oversight should complete

its review of this matter and bring the matter forward for

the House of Representatives to vote upon: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That unless the Committee on House Over2 sight has sooner reported a recommendation for its final

3 disposition, the contest in the 46th District of California

4 is dismissed upon the expiration of October 31, 1997.

Æ
Handbook 44 – 2022 Appendix E. Change Log

E-1

Appendix E. Change Log

Date Type of Edit Change (reflected in bold and underscore) Location

7/24/2023 This information was 

reflected in NIST HB 44 

(2019) and inadvertently 

removed from NIST 

Handbook 44 editions 

2020, 2022, and 2023.

S.1.6.7. Recorded Representations. –

Except for fleet sales and other price 

contract sales and for transactions where a 

post-delivery discount is provided, a printed 

receipt providing the following information 

shall be available through a built-in or

separate recording element for all 

transactions conducted with point-of-sale 

systems or devices activated by debit cards, 

credit cards, and/or cash:

(a) the total volume of the delivery;*

(b) the unit price;*

(c) the total computed price;* 

(d) the product identity by name, symbol, 

abbreviation, or code number;* and

(e) the dispenser designation by either an 

alphabetical or numerical 

description.**

[Nonretroactive as of 

January 1, 1986]**[Nonretroactive as of 

January 1, 2021]

(Added 1985) (Amended 1997, 2012, and 

2014)

S.1.6.8. Recorded Representations for 

Transactions Where a Post-Delivery 

Discount(s) is Provided. – Except for fleet 

sales and other price contract sales, a printed 

receipt providing the following information 

shall be available through a built-in or 

separate recording element that is part of the 

system for transactions involving a postdelivery discount:

(a) the product identity by name, symbol, 

abbreviation, or code number;

(b) transaction information as shown on 

the dispenser at the end of the 

delivery and prior to any postdelivery discount(s), including the: 

(1) total volume of the delivery; 

(2) unit price; and 

Section 3.30 Liquid 

Measuring Devices, 

Paragraph S.1.6.7.(e) 

and S.1.6.8.(e)
Appendix E. Change Log Handbook 44 – 2022

E-2

(3) total computed price of the fuel 

sale.

(c) an itemization of the post-delivery 

discounts to the unit price; and

(d) the final total price of the fuel sale 

after all post-delivery discounts are 

applied.

(e) the dispenser designation by either an 

alphabetical or numerical 

description.

[Nonretroactive as of January 1, 2021]

(Added 2012) (Amended 2014)
EXHIBIT 10.2 - DECLARATION RELATING TO GOVERNMENT COMMISSION'S GERMAN CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE CODE

     The Board of Managing Directors and Supervisory Board of Deutsche Bank AG
state in accordance with {section} 161 German Stock Corporation Act (AktG):

     Deutsche Bank AG complies with the recommendations of the "Government
Commission's German Corporate Governance Code" with the following exceptions:

     For the members of the Board of Managing Directors and Supervisory Board,
there is a directors and officers' liability insurance policy with only a small
deductible (Code No. 3.8).  This is actually a group insurance policy for a
large number of staff members in Germany and abroad.  Internationally, a higher
deductible is not customary.  It is not considered appropriate to differentiate
between board members and staff members.

     Separate compensation is not currently paid for chairing Supervisory Board
committees.  At the next General Meeting, the Board of Managing Directors and
Supervisory Board will propose amending {section} 14 (1) of the Articles of
Association of Deutsche Bank AG to provide for compensation for chairing
Supervisory Board committees (Code No. 5.4.5 (1), sentence 3).
EXHIBIT 32.26

 

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of        Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven B. Hildebrand, Chief Financial        Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to   § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act        of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

/s/ Steven B. Hildebrand

Steven B. Hildebrand

Chief Financial Officer

May 5, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. and will be retained by Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 29, 2019

t0722

Order 

Clerk

July 29, 2019

158586

ROBERT DAVIS and DESMOND WHITE,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

and

ANDREW A. PATERSON,

Appellant,

v SC: 158586

COA: 339200 

Wayne CC: 16-012226-AW

WAYNE COUNTY CLERK, WAYNE COUNTY

ELECTION COMMISSION, DETROIT CITY

CLERK, and PENELOPE BAILER,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 11, 2018 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 208 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 31, 1997.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and that they are hereby, 
elected to the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Banking and Financial Services: Mr. Weygand.
    Committee on National Security: Ms. McKinney.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Leon Hersch Corporation and Others, Plaintiffs, *v.*Max Goldberg, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Erie County,

February 26, 1926.

Sales — bulk sale in violation of Personal Property Law, § 44 — notice was not given to creditors — proceeding for appointment of receiver —• seller not made party to proceeding — general creditors cannot avail themselves of statute — disinterested party appointed receiver.

In proceedings under section 44 of the Personal Property Law to appoint a receiver of property sold in bulk, without notice to creditors of the seller, in violation of that section, the general creditors of the seller cannot avail themselves of the benefit of the provisions of section 44 of the Personal Property Law, since the seller is not a party of the proceeding; but a receiver is appointed at the instance of a judgment creditor, and in view of the fact that the receivership may continue until the general creditors have reduced their claims to judgment, the court appoints a disinterested party as receiver.

Action for the appointment of a receiver, under section 44 of the Personal Property Law (as amd. by Laws of 1914, chap. 507).

*Saperston, McNaughton & Saperston,*for the plaintiffs Leon Hersch Corporation and others. .

*MacGregor & Dale,*for the plaintiffs Bert Goldman and another.

*Knibloe, Lipsite & Lipsite,*for the defendant.

Harris, J.

Upon the trial it was proven that one Pincus Cohen had sold his entire stock of jewelry and fixtures in his retail jewelry business, conducted under the name of “ Coles ” in the city of Buffalo, and that neither the seller nor the purchaser, the defendant, Max Goldberg, gave the five days’ notice in writing to the creditors, *858as provided in section 44 of the Personal Property Law (as amd. by Laws of 1914, chap. 507).

It was further proven that certain judgments had been secured against said Pincus Cohen. Further proof Was made that there were a number of creditors of the said Pincus Cohen, but that such debts had not been reduced to judgment, and in view of the fact that the said Pincus Cohen was not made a party to this action, I am of the opinion that such creditors who had not reduced their claims to judgment could not avail themselves of the provisions of section 44 of the Personal Property Law.

In view of the fact that there were judgment creditors, and that the notice Was not given, I am of the opinion that, as to such judgment creditors, the transfer was void, and .that the said Max Goldberg holds the stock and fixtures as a trustee for the creditors, and that a receiver should be appointed. In view of the fact that such receivership may continue until the simple creditors have reduced their claims to judgment, I am of the opinion that this is an action in which a disinterested party should be appointed as a receiver. I name Jacob Kick, a counselor of this court, as such receiver.

Findings and judgment may be prepared and submitted, embodying the provisions of the above decision. The judgment creditors who appear as plaintiffs may have one bill of costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 303 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      November 5, 1997.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 2676) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restructure and reform 
the Internal Revenue Service, and for other purposes. The bill shall be 
considered as read for amendment. The amendment in the nature of a substitute 
recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill, modified 
by the amendments printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying 
this resolution, shall be considered as adopted. All points of order against the 
bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) two hours of debate on the bill, as amended, which shall be equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Lee C. Smith *v.*Noah Smith's Heirs.

Mortgage — Wrongful Control — Responsibility for Negligence Causing Loss.

Appellant obtained control of tbe mortgage by tlie assertion of an unfounded claim against tbe estate of bis father and is, therefore, responsible for the loss of the debt by reason of not instituting a suit to collect it, in the lifetime of the mortgagor.

APPEAL PROM BOURBON CIRCUIT COURT.

April 4, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

Appellant was never entitled to the possession or control to the mortgage executed by Abraham Wirth to Peter Smith and others. He .obtained control of such mortgage by reason of the assertion of an unfounded claim against the estate of his deceased father, and consequently held it all the while in his own wrong. Whether he was or not bound as assignee to use legal diligence in the collection of the debt evidenced by the mortgage, we do not deem it necessary to determine. Holding it as he did without right, he cannot be heard to say that the appellants lost nothing by reason of his negligence. He delayed suit from the 14th of October, 1864, until September, 1868. The life estate of the mortgagor in the lands embraced in the mortgage did not terminate until August,. 1868, nearly four years after the assignment to him. It cannot now be determined what amount might have been realized had this life estate been subjected to sale by a prompt and energetic institution of a suit for the foreclosure -of this -mortgage. Appellant, who occupied no better position than that of a mere intermeddler, was re*167sponsible for the delay, and he has no right now to complain that the loss falls upon him. Seeking as he does to escape responsibility, the onus is upon him to show that appellees did nothing by reason of his interference with the administrator. It is his misfortune that each fact can not now be shown. It is no ground of reversal that the judgment should have been in favor of the administrator instead' of the appellees.

*Davis, for appellant.*

*Alexander & Tiirney, Hanson, for appellee.*

The administrator is a party to this action and is not complaining on that account. This judgment is a bar to any subsequent proceeding for the recovery of the same debt by 'him.

Therefore such judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 351 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      February 5, 1998.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and that they are hereby, 
elected to the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Banking and Financial Services: Mr. Max Sandlin of Texas and 
Mr. Gregory Meeks of New York.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```