alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Lonnie CHRISTENSEN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 03-16336.

D.C. No. CR-95-00074-LDG.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 23, 2004.

Robert E. Lindsay, Alan Hechtkopf, Attorney, James M. Malone, U.S. Department of Justice Tax Division/Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marcia G. Shein, Decatur, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, COWEN,* and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The Honorable Robert E. Cowen, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation.

ORDER

By Memorandum Disposition filed simultaneously with this order, the Court denied appellant’s motion for bond pending appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s subsequent motion to withdraw, without prejudice, motion for bond pending the outcome of the appeal is DENIED AS MOOT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          49,368
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,861
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,831,313
<DEPRECIATION>                                 148,339
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,066,031
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          106,322
<BONDS>                                      1,504,852
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    295,000
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,066,031
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               233,530
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               147,295
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,486
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 91,687
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             91,687
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  3,075
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    88,612
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.58
        

</TABLE>
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel are you 

a Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this &ourt an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this &ourt’s

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 8.6.&§1746, this

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

&RPPRGLW\)XWXUHV7UDGLQJ

&RPPLVVLRQY/RQJ/HDI7UDGLQJHWDO

1:20-cv-03758

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Robert Howell

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

525 W. Monroe St., Ste. 1100

Chicago, IL 60661

 6286438 312-596-0590

rhowell@cftc.gov

6/26/2020

✔

✔

✔

✔

Robert Howell

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 5 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:38
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 21, 2011

d1114 

# Order

November 21, 2011

142729(11)

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 142729 ADB: 09-43-GA RAYMOND A. MACDONALD, Respondent-Appellant.

_____________ _______________ ____________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s July 25, 2011 order is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Luis CRISTOBAL, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-7151.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 16, 2004.

Decided Dec. 21, 2004.

Luis Cristobal, Appellant pro se. N. George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Luis Cristobal seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 *875U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cristobal has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

WESTERN DIVISION

Lavertis Stewart (A-15380), )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Case No. 20 C 50194

v. )

) Hon. Philip G. Reinhard

Wexford Health Source, Inc., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [3] is denied. If plaintiff 

wants to proceed with this lawsuit, he must pay the $400 filing fee. If plaintiff does not comply 

by July 1, 2020, this case will be summarily dismissed.

STATEMENT

Plaintiff Lavertis Stewart, a prisoner at Dixon Correctional Center, brings this pro se civil 

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis

(IFP) is before the court.

The Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) requires all inmates to pay the full filing fee. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). If an inmate cannot pay the full $400 filing fee upfront, he may submit 

an IFP application (in other words, a request for permission to pay the fee over time with monthly 

installments taken from his trust fund account; in that instance, the filing fee is $350 as an 

administrative fee is waived).

Plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Because plaintiff 

is a prisoner for whom the state provides the necessities of life, his income demonstrates that he 

does not qualify as indigent. See Lumbert v. Illinois Department of Corrections, 827 F.2d 257, 

260 (7th Cir. 1987). Plaintiff’s trust fund ledgers reflect a total of $1,600 in income (deposits) 

during the six months prior to the initiation of this action. The trust fund statement indicates an 

average monthly deposit over the last six months of $267, and a present balance of $1,370.33. 

Given plaintiff's consistent income, plaintiff must prepay the $400 statutory filing fee if he 

wants to proceed with this action. Plaintiff may pay by check or money order made payable to the 

Clerk of Court and mailed to the Clerk of Court, United States District Court, 219 South Dearborn 

Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604, attn: Cashier’s Desk, 20th Floor. If he fails to do so by the date 

specified above, the court will summarily dismiss this action.

Date: 6/02/2020 ENTER:

__________________________________________

United States District Court Judge

Notices mailed by Judicial Staff. (LC)

Case: 3:20-cv-50194 Document #: 8 Filed: 06/02/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:72
EXHIBIT
32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 
18 U.S.C. §1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of NB Capital Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Serge Lacroix, Chairman and President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ Serge LacroixSerge Lacroix
Chairman of the Board
and President
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:     November 12,
2004

A signed  original  of this  written
 statement  required  by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted), Carlos A. Rivas, the Chief Executive Officer of Verenium Corporation (the Company), and James E. Levine, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Periodic Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic
Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                |  |  |  |                                                     
|----------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 10, 2009                          |  |  |  |                                                     
|                                                |  | 
|/s/ Carlos A. Riva                              |  |  |  | /s/ James E. Levine                                 
|Carlos A. Riva                                  |  |  |  | James E. Levine                                     
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filling of Verenium Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form
10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 320 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                       November 10 (legislative day, November 9), 1997.
    Resolved, That a committee of two Members of the House be appointed to wait 
upon the President of the United States and inform him that the House of 
Representatives has completed its business of the session and is ready to 
adjourn, unless the President has some other communication to make to them.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50394

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY COTTRELL,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. MO-95-CR-12 (1)

- - - - - - - - - -

December 12, 1996

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Anthony Cottrell appeals from his conviction and sentence

for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine base, 

possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, and possession

of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 and 21 U.S.C. 

§ 846. Cottrell argues that his trial counsel was ineffective

for failing to communicate properly to him a plea offer. 

Cottrell has not shown that his counsel’s performance fell below 
No. 96-50394

- 2 -

an objective standard of reasonableness. Strickland v.

Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-88 (1984). 

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk October 24, 2012

p1017 

# Order

October 24, 2012

145101

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145101

COA: 305747

Eaton CC: 11

- 000404

- AR

DONALD EBRAHIMI,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 16, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 10.1



Exhibit 10.1


	
BRITISH
	
Ministry of Energy and Mines, Energy and Minerals Division
	
Mineral Title Branch

	
COLUMBIA
	
RECORD OF 2 POST CLAIM
	 
	 	
Mineral Tenure Act, Section 27
	 
	 	 
	
Mining Division
	
LILLOOET
	
Tenure Number
	
406637

	
Gold Commissioner
	
/s/ Illegible
	
Date of Record
	
OCTOBER 31, 2003






PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY


APPLICATION TO RECORD A 2 POST CLAIM


I, Gerard Gallissant, 783 MacCleave Ave., Penticton, B.C. V2A 3C4, (604) 492-2759, Client Number 109141, hereby apply for a record of a 2 post claim for the location as outlined on the attached copy of mineral titles reference map No.92J 16W, in the Lillooet Mining Division.


ACCESS


Describe how you gained access to the location; include references to roads, trails, topographic features, permanent landmarks and a description of the legal post location.


The IP is located 200m West and 500m North of confluence of Shulaps Creek and Yalakom River.  Access was gained by driving up Yalakom River Road for approximately 10km.


GPS Co-ordinates taken of posts: Yes [ ] No [x] If yes, complete information chart on reverse.


TAG INFORMATION


I have securely affixed the portion of the metal identification tag embossed "INITIAL POST (No. 1)" to the post and impressed this information on the tag: 


TAG NO. 724520 M INITIAL POST (No. 1)


	
CLAIM NAME
	
Red Eagle 1
	
CLAIM NAME
	
Red Eagle 1

	
LOCATOR
	
G. Gallissant
	
LOCATOR
	
G. Gallissant

	
AGENT FOR
	
Self
	
AGENT FOR
	
Self

	
DATE COMMENCED
	
October 31, 2003
	
DIST. FROM I.P.
	
500m

	
TIME COMMENCED
	
3:45 pm
	
DATE COMPLETED
	
October 31, 2003

	
DIR. TO F.P.
	
315 degrees
	
TIME COMPLETED
	
4:00 pm

	
METERS TO RIGHT
	 	 
	
METERS TO LEFT
	
500
	 
	 	
I have securely affixed the portion of the metal identification tag embossed "FINAL POST (No. 2)" to the final post (or the witness post) and impressed this information on the tag:

	
"Direction" means a bearing measured between 0 degrees and 360 degrees, where 0 degrees is the bearing of true north.
	
If witness post placed for final post: Bearing and distance from the witness post to the true position of the final post, exactly as written on the witness post:__ degrees, ___ meters.






	
I have complied with all the terms and conditions of the Mineral Tenure Act and Regulation pertaining to the location of 2 post claims and have attached a plan of the location on which the positions of the initial and final posts (and witness post if applicable) are indicated. The tag information supplied above is the identical information that I impressed upon the respective tags affixed to the applicable post when located this claim, and this information is true and correct. 
	 
	 	
[FILE STAMP]

	
/s/ Gerard Gallissant
	 
	
Signature of Locator
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 52 Agreed to House (ATH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 52

 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 1997

  Mr. Canady of Florida submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and that they are 
hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. Hill and Mr. Sununu.
                                 <all>
```
No. 03

- 14

- 00071

- CV

Austin Independent School District, § IN THE THIRD

Appellant, §

§

v. § COURT OF APPEALS

§

Andrew Lofters, §

Appellee. § AUSTIN, TEXAS

APPELLEE’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO

FILE FOR MOTION FOR REHEARING

________________________________________________________________

Appellee, Andrew Lofters, asks the Court to extend the time to file the motion

for rehearing.

A. Introduc tion

1. Appellant is Austin Independent School District; Appellee is Andrew

Lofters.

2. This motion is filed within the 15

- day period to file a motion to extend the

time to file a motion for rehearing, as required by Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 49.8.

3. The parties have agreed to this motion.

1 ACCEPTED

03-14-00071-CV

4881151

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

4/14/2015 12:10:43 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKB. Argument & Authorities

4. The Court has the authority under Rule 49.8 to extend the time for a party to

file a motion for rehearing.

5. Appellee’s motion for rehearing is due on April 16, 2015.

6. Appellee re quests an additional 12 days to file the motion for rehearing,

extending the time until April 28, 2015.

7. No extension has been granted to extend the time to file the motion for

rehearing.

8. Appellee needs additional time to file the motion for rehearing because

Appellee’s counsel has an unusual heavy docket schedule

. Appellee’s request to

extend time is for good cause and is not intended to delay these proceedings.

C. Conclusion/Prayer

9. For these reasons, Appellee asks the Court to grant an extension of time to

file the motion for rehearing until April 28, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

Potter Bledsoe, LLP

___/s/ Gary L. Bledsoe___

Gary L. Bledsoe

Sta te Bar No. 02476500

garybledsoe@sbcglobal.net

2Harry G. Potter III

State Bar No. 16175300

hpotter@potterbledsoe.com

316 West 12th Street, Suite 307

Austin, Texas 78701

Tel: (512) 322

- 9992

Fax: (512) 322

- 0840

Attorneys for Andrew Lofters

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I certify that my office has conferred with Jonathan G. Bush by telephone, and

he has agreed and is unopposed to Appellee’s motion to extend time to file for

motion for rehearing until April 28, 2015.

___/s/ Gary L. Bledsoe___

Gary L. Bledsoe

3CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was served

on counse l for Austin Independent School District today, April 14, 2015, through

the court's electronic filing system and by email to the following addresses:

Jonathan G. Brush

jbrush@rmgllp.com

Richard A. Morris

rmorris@rmgllp.com

Rogers, Morris & Grover, L.L.P.

5718 Westheimer, Suite 1200

Houston, Texas 77057

Tel: (713) 960

- 6000

Fax: (713) 960

- 6025

Attorneys for Austin Independent School District

___/s/ Gary L. Bledsoe___

Gary L. Bledsoe

4
9672.

#### State Life Insurance Company *v.*Anderson.

Decided July 11, 1918.

Complaint; from city court of Atheps—Judge West. March 9, 1918.

*Green & Michael, O. J. Tolmos,*for plaintiff in error.

*Thomas J. Shaclcelford,*contra.

Wade, C. J.

There are no special assignments of error, and though the testimony was apparently somewhat indefinite, there was some evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge; and therefore the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial is

*Affirmed.*

*Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.*