alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### John W. Brown, etc., *v.*Goodridge’s Executor.

Judgments — Clerical Misprision — How Corrected.

A clerical misprision cannot be made available in the Court of Appeals until the circuit court upon proper application refuses to correct it.

APPEAL FROM HENRY CIRCUIT COURT.

September 6, 1871.

*Webb & Barber, for appellant.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:-

The demurrer was sustained to the original petition because the executors of F. FI. Goodridge were not made parties plaintiff. The amended petition made them parties and cured this defect, and the petition as amended set out a cause of action.

The appellants can not complain in this court on account of judgment having been rendered at the same time at which the amendment was made.

They did not ask for a continuance because of surprise. Nor does their answer disclose any ground of defense to the portion of the note for which judgment was rendered. If, as insisted by counsel, it was improper to render judgment at the same term at which the petition was amended (a question we do not decide) the error was merely a clerical misprision and can not be made available in this court, until the circuit court, upon proper application, refuses to correct it. *Civil Code, Sec.*580. Judge Pryor did not sit in this case.

Judgment affirmed.
KEVIN D. JEWELL

SHAREHOLDER

DIRECT DIAL NO.(713) 654-9620

E-MAIL: kevin.jewell@chamberlainlaw.com

February 9, 2015 

Christopher Prine, Clerk 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

301 Fannin, Room 245 

Houston, Texas 77002 

Re: No. 14-14-00077-CV; MKM Engineers, Inc., et al v. Jal B. Guzder; in 

the Fourteenth Court of Appeals, Houston, Texas. 

Dear Mr. Prine: 

This matter is scheduled for oral argument February 11, 2015. 

Justice Murry Cohen will argue on behalf of Appellant MKM Engineers, 

Inc., and Kevin Jewell will argue on behalf of Appellant PIKA International, Inc. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Kevin D. Jewell 

Kevin D. Jewell 

KDJ/dlk 

1717782_1

ACCEPTED

14-14-00077-CV

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

2/9/2015 3:28:32 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 2/9/2015 3:28:32 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
February 9, 2015

Page 2

Via electronic service

Adam Q. Voyles 

Lubel Voyles LLP

5020 Montrose Blvd., Ste. 800

Houston, Texas 77006

Via electronic service

Alan N. Magenheim

Magenheim & Associates

3701 Kirby Drive, Suite 1144

Houston, Texas 77098

Via electronic service

Michael L. Orsak, L.P.

611 Houston Street

Richmond, Texas 77469

Via electronic service

Murry B. Cohen

Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer &

Feld LLP

1111 Louisiana Street, 44th Floor

Houston, Texas 77002
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Gramercy Capital Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roger M. Cozzi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2.

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ ROGER M. COZZIName: Roger M. CozziTitle: Chief Executive Officer
 Date: September 22, 2011
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 31.2
                     RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A) CERTIFICATION

I, Lauren Farrell, Chief Financial Officer of Ambient Corporation (the
"Company"), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company is made known to us by others
within the Company, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors
(or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.

                                        Date: AUGUST 12, 2005


                                        /s/ LAUREN FARRELL
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        LAUREN FARRELL
                                        CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
#### Thomas Cross *v.*James S. Clarkson, etc.

Deeds — Acknowledgment—Certificate of — County Judge’s Seal.

.•The certificate of the acknowledgment of the deed does not show that the judge himself affixed to it the seal of his court, nor that he caused it to be done by the clerk thereof. The clerk verifies his own certificate by his official seal and not by the seal of the county court. The two seals may be one and the same, but it is necessary under the law that it shall in some way affirmatively appear that the certificate of the judge is made under the seal of his court.

*746APPEAL, FROM KENTON CIRCUIT COURT.

September 16, 1872.

*Benton, R. D. Handy, for appellant.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay :

Appellant insists that as judges are not usually the custodians of the seals of their courts it is sufficient under the provisions of the 17th section of chapter 24, Revised Statutes, for them to cause such seals to be affixed to their certificates by the officers having them in legal custody.

The certificate of the acknowledgment by Mrs. Clarkson of the deed to Rich does not show that the judge himself affixed to it the seal of his court, nor that he caused it to be done by the clerk thereof, and the clerk verifies his own certificate by his official seal and not by the seal of the county court. The two seals may be one and the same, but it is necessary under the law that it shall in some way affirmatively appear that the certificate of the judge is made under the seal of his court. From the certificate of the clerk it does not even appear that he is the clerk of the court over which the judge presides nor, indeed, of any court, considering everything appearing upon the conveyance, it cannot be adjudged that the certificate of the judge of the county court is in any way verified by the seal of his court.

The defect in the attestation of the instrument is a substantial one, and authorized the chancellor to hold that the attempted conveyance did not divest the mother of the appellants of her title to the real estate therein described.

Judgment affirmed.
EX-3.D(i) Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
------------------------------------------------


DEAN HELLER                                Certificate of
Secretary of State                         Amendment

202 North Carson Street
Carson City, Nevada 89701-4201
(775) 684-5708

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
                 For Nevada Profit Corporations
  (Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - After Issuance of Stock)
                     - Remit in Duplicate -



1. Name of corporation: Bridge Technology, Inc.
                        -----------------------------------------------------

2. The articles have been amended as follows (provide article numbers, if
available):

   Sixth.  The members of the governing Board shall be styled as Directors of
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
the Corporation and the Board shall consist of at least three (3) and no more
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
than fifteen (15) members.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation
entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such
greater proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a
vote by classes or series, or as may be required by the provisions of the
articles of incorporation have voted in favor of the amendment is: 5,757,489
                                                                   ---------

4. Officer Signature (Required):

     John Harwer        8/16/2001
   ----------------------------------
     John Harwer, President

* If any proposed amendment would alter or change any preference or any
relative or other right given to any class or series of outstanding shares,
then the amendment must be approved by the vote, in addition to the
affirmative vote otherwise required, of the holders of shares representing a
majority of the voting power of each class or series affected by the
amendment regardless of limitations or restrictions on the voting power
thereof.

IMPORTANT: Failure to include any of the above information and remit the
proper fees may cause this filing to be rejected.
Exhibit 31


Certification

I, Robert McGinnis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust 2004-3;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these
reports is included in these reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in
accordance with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these
reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells
Fargo Home Mortgage and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company.

Date: March 30, 2005

/s/: Robert McGinnis
Robert McGinnis
President
EXHIBIT

C

Case: 1:20-cv-02369 Document #: 101-3 Filed: 09/01/22 Page 1 of 22 PageID #:1333
Case: 1:20-cv-02369 Document #: 101-3 Filed: 09/01/22 Page 2 of 22 PageID #:1334
Case: 1:20-cv-02369 Document #: 101-3 Filed: 09/01/22 Page 3 of 22 PageID #:1335
Case: 1:20-cv-02369 Document #: 101-3 Filed: 09/01/22 Page 4 of 22 PageID #:1336
Case: 1:20-cv-02369 Document #: 101-3 Filed: 09/01/22 Page 5 of 22 PageID #:1337
Case: 1:20-cv-02369 Document #: 101-3 Filed: 09/01/22 Page 6 of 22 PageID #:1338
Case: 1:20-cv-02369 Document #: 101-3 Filed: 09/01/22 Page 7 of 22 PageID #:1339
Case: 1:20-cv-02369 Document #: 101-3 Filed: 09/01/22 Page 8 of 22 PageID #:1340
Case: 1:20-cv-02369 Document #: 101-3 Filed: 09/01/22 Page 9 of 22 PageID #:1341
Case: 1:20-cv-02369 Document #: 101-3 Filed: 09/01/22 Page 10 of 22 PageID #:1342
Case: 1:20-cv-02369 Document #: 101-3 Filed: 09/01/22 Page 11 of 22 PageID #:1343
Case: 1:20-cv-02369 Document #: 101-3 Filed: 09/01/22 Page 12 of 22 PageID #:1344
Case: 1:20-cv-02369 Document #: 101-3 Filed: 09/01/22 Page 13 of 22 PageID #:1345
Case: 1:20-cv-02369 Document #: 101-3 Filed: 09/01/22 Page 14 of 22 PageID #:1346
Case: 1:20-cv-02369 Document #: 101-3 Filed: 09/01/22 Page 15 of 22 PageID #:1347
Case: 1:20-cv-02369 Document #: 101-3 Filed: 09/01/22 Page 16 of 22 PageID #:1348
Case: 1:20-cv-02369 Document #: 101-3 Filed: 09/01/22 Page 17 of 22 PageID #:1349
Case: 1:20-cv-02369 Document #: 101-3 Filed: 09/01/22 Page 18 of 22 PageID #:1350
Case: 1:20-cv-02369 Document #: 101-3 Filed: 09/01/22 Page 19 of 22 PageID #:1351
Case: 1:20-cv-02369 Document #: 101-3 Filed: 09/01/22 Page 20 of 22 PageID #:1352
Case: 1:20-cv-02369 Document #: 101-3 Filed: 09/01/22 Page 21 of 22 PageID #:1353
Case: 1:20-cv-02369 Document #: 101-3 Filed: 09/01/22 Page 22 of 22 PageID #:1354
#### The Jefferson Southern Pond & Draining Company *v.*E. J. Frisbee et al.

Taxation — Private Corporation Authorized by Law to Make Assessment— Superior Lien to Prior Incumbrance.

The second section of the act gave to appellant a lien on the land assessed for the payment of the tax. This lien is not made to depend upon the manner in which the land may be held, and cannot be defeated because of the fact’that the owner had incumbered his title by mortgage or otherwise prior to the assessment of the tax. The holder of the legal title and the equitable owner of the land are alike bound to submit to the payment of any tax constitutionally imposed, whether it be for the use and benefit of the commonwealth, or a public, or a mere private corporation.

*466APPEAL PROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT.

June 22, 1871.

*Coke & Arbegast, for appellant.*

*Moore, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

No objection is taken to the claim of appellant on account of any doubts as co the constitutionality of the tax assessed (against the lands decreed to be sold) under the acts of the general assembly authorizing the assessment thereof by the Jefferson Southern Pond & Draining Company, hence the only question presented foi adjudication is as to the priority of the liens held by the various creditors.

The second section of the act of March 9, 1868 (2 vol., Session Acts 1867-68), gives to the said Pond Draining Company “a lien on the land assessed for the payment of the tax.”

This lien is not made to depend upon the manner in which the land may be held, and cannot be defeated because of the fact that the owner had encumbered his title by mortgage or otherwise prior to the assessment of the tax. The holder of the legal title and the equitable owner of the land are alike bound to submit to the payment of any tax, constitutionally imposed, whether it be for the use and benefit of the commonwealth or of a public or a mere private corporation.

The fact that the tax is assessed and collected through the agency of a corporation does not make it any the less the act of the state government than if it had been directly imposed by the legislature and its collection enforced in the same manner with the general revenues of the commonwealth.

The assessment, if constitutional, is a debt due to the state, to be collected and expended by the Pond Draining Company for the benefit of the local public affected thereby, consequently the company’s lien on the lands taxed is superior to all others, whether prior or subsequently in date.

In so far as the judgment postpones the appellant to other creditors it is erroneous, and to that extent it is reversed.

The cause is remanded for the correction of said error and for other proper proceedings.
* Note on Redacted Material:  Sections under the heading Proposed Rates, SMD Personnel, and Proposed

Work Schedule in Exhibit B to this Agreement have been omitted pursuant to a Confidential Treatment Request

(Request)  Timberline Resources Corporation filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission

(SEC) concurrently With the filing of the Form 10-K to which this Agreement is an exhibit.  The omitted material

has been filed separately with the SEC as part of the request.  The place of omitted provisions are indicated below

as REDACTED.  Two pages contain omitted provisions.

[ex1021red002.gif]



---

[ex1021red003.jpg]



---

[ex1021red004.jpg]



---

[ex1021red005.jpg]



---

[ex1021red006.jpg]



---

[ex1021red007.jpg]



---

[ex1021red008.jpg]



---

[ex1021red009.jpg]



---

[ex1021red010.jpg]



---

[ex1021red011.jpg]



---

[ex1021red012.jpg]



---

[ex1021red013.jpg]



---

[ex1021red014.jpg]



---

[ex1021red015.jpg]



---

[ex1021red016.jpg]



---

[ex1021red017.jpg]



---

[ex1021red018.jpg]



---

[ex1021red019.jpg]



---

[ex1021red020.jpg]



---

[ex1021red021.jpg]



---

[ex1021red022.jpg]



---

[ex1021red023.jpg]



---

[ex1021red024.jpg]



---

[ex1021red025.jpg]



---

[ex1021red026.jpg]



---

[ex1021red027.jpg]



---

[ex1021red029.gif]



---

[ex1021red031.gif]



---

[ex1021red032.jpg]



---

[ex1021red033.jpg]



---

[ex1021red034.jpg]



---

[ex1021red035.jpg]



---

[ex1021red036.jpg]



---

[ex1021red037.jpg]



---

[ex1021red038.jpg]



---

[ex1021red039.jpg]



---

[ex1021red040.jpg]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0453 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SCOTT KELLY WALSH,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 21, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 14 2021

12/14/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0453
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

MAGRO, et al.

vs Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner(s), CASE NO: 2:16-cv-00186-ESW
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC., RICHARD C. ADKERSON, | Application of Attorney For Admission To Practice Pro Hac
and KATHLEEN L. QUIRK, Vice Pursuant to LRCiv 83.1(b)(2)

Defendant(s)/Respondent(s)
NOTICE: $35.00 APPLICATION FEE REQUIRED!

1, Jeremy A. Lieberman , hereby apply to the Court under LRCiv 83.1(b)(2) for pro hac vice

admission to appear and practice in this action on behalf of Plaintiff, Dean Magro

City and State of Principal Residence: New York, New York __

POMERANTZ LLP

Firm Name: _ = ——
‘Address: 600 Third Avenue, 20th Floor ____ Suite: ee
City: New York a State: NY Zip: 10016

Firm/Business Phone: (212 _) 661-1100

(212 ) 661-8665

E-mail Address: jalieberman@pomlaw.com

Firm Fax Phone:

I am admitted to practice before the following courts. (attach additional sheets if necessary)
TITLE OF COURT DATE OF ADMISSION IN GOOD STANDING?

Supreme Court, State of New York, Second Department 09/17/2003 Oo No*
oO No*
[ves []no*

United States District Court, Southern District of New York 01/10/2006

* Explain:

(An Original Certificate of Good Standing froma FEDERAL BAR in which an applicant has been adnitted dated no more than 45 days
prior to submission of this application is required.)

I have concurrently, or within | year of this application, made pro hac vice applications to this Court in the following actions (attach
additional sheets if necessary):
Case Number Title of Action Date Granted or Denied*

* Explain:
ALL APPLICANTS ARE REQUIRED TO ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS.
Ifyou answer YES to either of the following questions, please explain all circumstances on a separate page.
Are you currently the subject of a disciplinary investigation or proceeding by any Bar or Court? Yes
Have you ever been disbarred from practice in any Court? Clyes
larly employed, engaged in business, professional
ry proceedings in any court. I certify that I

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is trueand correct; that I am not a resident of, nor and r
or other activities in the State of Ariana; and that Lam not currently suspended, disbarral or subject to di
have read and will ascribe to the Standards for Professional Conduct, will comply with the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the
District of Arizona (“Local Ruks”), and will subscribe to receive court notices as required by LRCiv 83.1(c).

([38| 201
Date Signature of Applic:
Fee Receipt #

(Rev. 04/12)


CSDNY (05/2010) Certificate of Good Standing

United States District Court

Southern District of New York

Certificate of
Good Standing
I, Ruby J. Krajick, Clerk of this Court, certify that
JEREMY ALAN LIEBERMAN , Bar # JL6130

.

was duly admitted to practice in this Court on

JANUARY 10th, 2006 , and is in good standing as a member of the Bar of this
Court.

¢

4

500 Pearl Street
Dated at New York, New York on JANUARY 29th, 2016

___Ruby J. Krajick , a

Clerk Deputy Clerk