alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 273

Condemning the military intervention by the Government of the Republic

of Angola into the Republic of the Congo, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 21, 1997

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself, Mr. ROYCE, and Mr. HASTINGS of Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

International Relations

RESOLUTION

Condemning the military intervention by the Government

of the Republic of Angola into the Republic of the Congo,

and for other purposes.

Whereas President Pascal Lissouba defeated former President Denis Sassou-Nguesso in a 1992 election in the Republic of the Congo that was determined to be free and

fair;

Whereas in October 1997 troops of the Government of the

Republic of Angola assisted in the capture of Pointe

Noire, a city in the southern part of the Republic of the

Congo;

Whereas the Government of Angola sent more than 1,000

troops into the Republic of the Congo from neighboring
2

•HRES 273 IH

Cabinda, including a MiG-23 fighter and ground attack

squadrons;

Whereas the Government of Angola provided military supplies

and support to former President Denis Sassou-Nguesso

to assist his efforts to unseat the democratically-elected

President Pascal Lissouba;

Whereas the Lusaka Protocol of 1994 requires that the Government of Angola inform the United Nations Observer

Mission in Angola (MONUA) of any troop movements;

Whereas the actions by Angola are a violation of Article 2 of

the United Nations Charter which forbids member states

from ‘‘the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state’’; and

Whereas the actions by Angola are a violation of Article III

of the Organization of African Unity Charter which mandates ‘‘Respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of each State’’: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) condemns the military intervention by the

3 Government of the Republic of Angola into the Re4 public of the Congo;

5 (2) calls on the Government of Angola to imme6 diately withdraw all military troops, supplies, and

7 other assistance from the Republic of the Congo;

8 (3) encourages the United States Government

9 to condemn the military intervention by the Govern10 ment of Angola into the Republic of the Congo and

11 its violation of the Lusaka Protocol, the United Na-
3

•HRES 273 IH

1 tions Charter, and the Organization of African

2 Unity Charter;

3 (4) urges the United States Government to

4 withhold any military training and assistance to An5 gola until it ceases all military activities in the Re6 public of the Congo; and

7 (5) expresses concern that the United States

8 Government has sought to strengthen military ties

9 with the Government of Angola in advance of the

10 full implementation of the Lusaka Protocol and the

11 full integration of the Angolan military.

Æ
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL SANCHEZ,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00244-CR

Appeal from the

243rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20170D03473)

O R D E R

The record before us does not contain the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s 

right of appeal. TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The trial court is ordered to prepare and file with 

the trial court clerk within thirty days from the date of this order a certification of the defendant’s 

right of appeal as required by TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2) and 25.2(d). The trial court clerk shall 

prepare a supplemental clerk’s record containing the certification and file it with this Court no 

later than April 19, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 5

th day of March, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
IV

House Calendar No. 92

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 232

[Report No. 105–255]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 2160) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies programs

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1998, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 18, 1997

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered

to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 2160) making appropriations

for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1998, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 2160) making appropriations for
2

HRES 232 RH

1 Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Adminis2 tration, and Related Agencies programs for the fiscal year

3 ending September 30, 1998, and for other purposes. All

4 points of order against the conference report and against

5 its consideration are waived.

6 SEC. 2. Upon adoption of this resolution the House

7 shall be considered to have adopted the concurrent resolu8 tion specified in section 3.

9 SEC. 3. The text of the concurrent resolution de10 scribed in section 2 is as follows:

11 ‘‘Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

12 concurring), That in the enrollment of H.R. 2160 the

13 Clerk of the House shall, in title IV, in the item relating

14 to ‘Domestic Food Programs—Food Stamp Program’,

15 strike the period and insert the following: ‘: Provided fur16 ther, That none of the funds made available under this

17 heading shall be used for studies and evaluations.’.’’.

House Calendar No. 92

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 232

[Report No. 105–255]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference reSeptember 30, 1998, and for other purposes. ed Agencies programs for the fiscal year ending ment, Food and Drug Administration, and Relat- appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Develop- port to accompany the bill (H.R. 2160) making

SEPTEMBER 18, 1997

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 119

Providing for the mandatory implementation of the Office Waste Recycling

Program in the House of Representatives.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 16, 1997

Mr. FARR of California (for himself, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. PORTER, Mrs.

MORELLA, Mr. EVANS, Mr. YATES, Mr. OLVER, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr.

BLUMENAUER, Mr. TORRES, Mr. CUMMINGS, Ms. NORTON, Mr. WALSH,

Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. MURTHA, Mr. WAXMAN, Ms.

HARMAN, Mr. GEJDENSON, Mr. GEPHARDT, Mr. CAPPS, Mr. SHAYS, AND

Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas) submitted the following resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on House Oversight

RESOLUTION

Providing for the mandatory implementation of the Office

Waste Recycling Program in the House of Representatives.

Whereas landfills throughout the Nation are filling up and

the need for more efficient use of our resources grows

stronger everyday;

Whereas the House of Representatives uses over 2,500 tons

of recyclable paper products a year, yet only recycles a

small portion of this waste;

Whereas the House of Representatives should set an example

for the Nation by implementing a simple, efficient, costeffective recycling program for all recyclable products;
2

•HRES 119 IH

Whereas the House of Representatives could save an enormous sum of money in hauling costs and landfill fees by

increasing the percentage of its waste that is recycled;

Whereas the House of Representatives currently generates

revenue by selling its paper products to haulers, and

could significantly increase this amount with full participation by all House of Representatives offices; and

Whereas there are still problems with the collection and separation of the waste products from those offices who have

chosen to participate in the Office Waste Recycling Program: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT.

3 Each Member and each employing authority of the

4 House of Representatives shall comply with the Office

5 Waste Recycling Program of the Office of the Architect

6 of the Capitol.

7 SEC. 2. TRAINING.

8 The Architect of the Capitol shall—

9 (1) ensure that all employees of the House of

10 Representatives whose responsibilities include custo11 dial duties are adequately trained in the implementa12 tion of the Office Waste Recycling Program; and

13 (2) require any contractor under a contract

14 with the House of Representatives for carrying out

15 the Office Waste Recycling Program to ensure that

16 all contractor personnel are adequately trained in
3

•HRES 119 IH

1 the implementation of the Office Waste Recycling

2 Program.

3 SEC. 3. REGULATIONS.

4 The Committee on House Oversight shall have au5 thority to prescribe regulations to carry out this Resolu6 tion.

7 SEC. 4. REPORT.

8 The Architect of the Capitol shall submit semiannu9 ally to the Committee on House Oversight a progress re10 port on compliance with the Office Waste Recycling Pro11 gram. The report shall include information on the imple12 mentation of the program and participation in the pro13 gram.

Æ
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 107 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                  House Calendar No. 14
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 107

                          [Report No. 105-45]

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 8, 1997

    Mr. Dreier, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

    Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on Wednesday, April 
9, 1997, or on Thursday, April 10, 1997, for the Speaker to entertain 
motions that the House suspend the rules. The Speaker or his designee 
shall consult with the minority leader or his designee on the 
designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to this 
resolution.




                                                  House Calendar No. 14

105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 107

                          [Report No. 105-45]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 8, 1997

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 216 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 216

    Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to Marcus Garvey.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 1997

 Mr. Rangel submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing the sense of Congress with respect to Marcus Garvey.

Whereas Marcus Mosiah Garvey was born in St. Ann's Bay, Jamaica, on August 17, 
        1887, and emigrated to the United States where he founded the Universal 
        Negro Improvement Association;
Whereas Marcus Garvey was the father of the largest African-American movement 
        for human rights and economic self-sufficiency of all time, attracting 
        millions of followers in the United States, the Caribbean, Latin 
        America, Africa, and Europe;
Whereas Marcus Garvey's philosophy inspired some of the world's great Black 
        leaders;
Whereas leading a movement for economic independence among Black Americans, 
        Marcus Garvey became the target of surveillance and harassment by United 
        States Government law enforcement agencies;
Whereas Marcus Garvey was prosecuted and convicted of mail fraud, imprisoned, 
        and later, deported to Jamaica;
Whereas the case against Marcus Garvey was politically motivated, the charges 
        unsubstantiated, and his conviction unjust;
Whereas millions of petitioners have appealed for his exoneration;
Whereas Marcus Garvey is recognized as a national hero in his native Jamaica, 
        and as a towering figure in nations around the world; and
Whereas Marcus Garvey's life and contributions to the United States should be 
        recognized and appropriate steps taken to restore his name and 
        reputation in this country: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) Marcus Garvey was innocent of the charges brought 
        against him by the United States Government,
            (2) Marcus Garvey is and should be recognized 
        internationally as a leader and thinker in the struggle for 
        human rights, and
            (3) the President should take appropriate measures within 
        his power to clear Marcus Garvey's good name.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 348 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      February 5, 1998.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2846) to prohibit spending Federal education funds on national 
testing without explicit and specific legislation. The first reading of the bill 
shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall 
not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Education and the Workforce. After general 
debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It 
shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment 
under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute 
recommended by the Committee on Education and the Workforce now printed in the 
bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered 
as read. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the 
Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of 
whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the 
portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 6 of 
rule XXIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman of 
the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further 
consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any 
amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for electronic voting 
on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without 
intervening business, provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on 
the first in any series of questions shall be fifteen minutes. At the conclusion 
of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 
the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member 
may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the 
Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature 
of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except 
one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
NO. 12- 15 -00043- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TWELTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT

AT TYLER, TEXAS

CAUSE NUMBER 2014-0129

IN THE 159 TH DISTRICT COURT

IN ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS

MIKO PARKS, APPELLANT

vs.

THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE

FIRST SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT’S BRIEF

T. RYAN DEATON

TBC # 24007095

103 E. Denman

Lufkin, Texas 75901

(936) 637-7778

Attorneys for Appellant ACCEPTED

12-15-00043-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

7/17/2015 12:20:05 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERKNO. 12

- 15

- 00043

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TWELTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT

AT TYL ER, TEXAS

CAUSE NUMBER 2014

- 0129

IN THE 159 TH DISTRICT COURT

IN ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS

MIKO PARKS, APPELLANT

vs.

THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE

FIRST SUPPLEMENT TO APPELLANT’S BRIEF

Certificate of Compliance with Tex. R. App . P. 9.4(i)

Appellant’s Brief filed in this matter on July 15, 2015, was prepared in

Times New Roman 14 pt. typeface using Microsoft Word 20 07 , and, in reliance on

the word count of the computer program used to prepare the document. I certify

that Appell ant’s Brief contain ed 2,691 words excluding those matters excluded byTexas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4(i)(1).

____________________________ T. Ryan Deaton

Respectfully submitted,

Respectfully submitted,

DEAT ON LAW FIRM

103 East Denman

Lufkin, TX 75901

Tel: (936) 637

- 7778

Fax: (936) 637

- 7784

By: _____________________________

T. Ryan Deaton

State Bar No. 24007095

Attorney for Miko Parks

C ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on July 1 7 , 2015, a true and correct copy of the above

and foregoing document was served on the District Attorney's Office, Angelina

County, Texas, by facsimile transmission.

______________________________ ___ T. Ryan Deaton
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 191

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the interference of the European Commission in the merger of the Boeing Company and McDonnell Douglas.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 21, 1997

Mr. METCALF (for himself, Ms. DUNN, Mr. DICKS, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, Mr. NETHERCUTT, Mrs. LINDA SMITH of Washington, Mr. ADAM

SMITH of Washington, Mr. WHITE, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Ms. MILLENDERMCDONALD, Mr. DREIER, Ms. HARMAN, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr.

MATSUI, Mr. HORN, and Mr. LEWIS of California) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the interference of the European Commission in the

merger of the Boeing Company and McDonnell Douglas.

Whereas the Boeing Company and McDonnell Douglas have

announced their merger;

Whereas the Department of Defense has approved the merger

as consistent with the national security of the United

States;

Whereas the Federal Trade Commission has found that the

merger does not violate the antitrust laws of the United

States;
2

•HRES 191 IH

Whereas the European Commission has been highly critical

of the merger in its consideration of the facts;

Whereas the European Commission is apparently determined

to disapprove the merger to gain an unfair competitive

advantage for Airbus Industries, a government-owned aircraft manufacturer; and

Whereas this dispute could threaten to disrupt the overall relationship between the European Union and the United

States which had a two-way trade in goods and services

of approximately $366,000,000,000 in 1996: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that—

3 (1) any disapproval by the European Commis4 sion of the merger of the Boeing Company and

5 McDonnell Douglas would constitute an unwar6 ranted and unprecedented interference in a United

7 States business transaction that would directly

8 threaten thousands of American aerospace jobs and

9 potentially put many more jobs at risk on both sides

10 of the Atlantic; and

11 (2) the President should take such actions as

12 he considers to be appropriate to protect United

13 States interests in connection with this matter.

Æ
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 98-1249ND

_____________ Sandra Martell, on behalf of Scott * Poitra, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District v. * of North Dakota. * Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, * [UNPUBLISHED] Social Security Administration, * * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: October 23, 1998

Filed: October 28, 1998

_____________ Before FAGG, ROSS, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Sandra Martell, for her son Scott Poitra, a minor, appeals the district co urt's grant of summary judgment affirming the Social Security Commissioner's decision to deny Poitr asupplemental security income disability benefits. After careful review of th e administrative record and the parties' briefs, we conc lude substantial evidence supports the decision of the Commissioner that Poitra is not disabled for soc ial security purposes andthe judgment of the district court is correct. Because the case presents no novel issues, we affirm the district court without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6153

RODNEY JAY TUCKER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JAMES HARDY,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. Wallace W. Dixon,

Magistrate Judge. (1:06-cv-00738-WWD)

Submitted: June 1, 2007 Decided: June 14, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodney Jay Tucker, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Rodney Jay Tucker seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Tucker has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED