alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### WILLIAM DODD ET AL., PROSECUTORS, v. WALTER D. VAN RIPER, ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND ACTING PROSECUTOR OF THE PLEAS OF HUDSON COUNTY, RESPONDENT.

Argued January 22, 1946

Decided February 4, 1946.

Before Justices Case, Bodine and Pbkskie.

For the prosecutors, *Maurice G. Brigadier.*

For the respondent, Walter D. Yan Riper, *George M. Uichler.*

*566The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bodine, J.

The prosecutors of this writ were appointed county detectives in Hudson County on January 20th, 1944, from the Civil Service list. Two have since died and by appropriate order their personal representatives have been substituted. During the working test period, the Attorney-General, who had taken over the duties of the prosecutor’s office, pursuant to the statute, notified each incumbent that his conduct and capacity were not satisfactory and that their services would be terminated as of April 20th, 1944.

The record submitted supports the action taken under *B. S.*11:12-l-2. Everything that should have been done was done. *Lingrell*v. *Civil Service Commission,*131 *N. J. L.*461.

The argument is made that the work test period under the state service is four months, whereas the probationary period under the county service is three months. Be that as it may, the proofs show that none of the prosecutors were of any help in the office in preparing cases for trial and were unskilled in discovering facts and unable to distinguish between hearsay and legal testimony. During the three months that they were in the office, there was never a single occasion on which one of them reported to anyone in the office any information with respect to any offense in the county.

One of them at least demonstrated his frankness by stating to an assistant prosecutor: “You know, we have never been in court before, we are not supposed to do this work, we are only here as political appointees.”

It is hard to understand how a longer test period would have accomplished any useful purpose, even if it were required.

Complaint is made that certain of the prosecutors were veterans. There are no special provisions made with respect to the removal of veterans from public office prior to their permanent appointment. The tenure statutes do not apply to the probationary period.

The writ will be dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Gramercy Capital Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jon W. Clark, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2.

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ JON W. CLARKName: Jon W. Clark Title:  Chief Financial Officer
 Date: September 22, 2011
INTRODUCTION

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has adopted new Rules 182 and 1182. The 

Rules are effective October 1, 2016. 

EXPLANATORY REPORT

SEPTEMBER 2014

These new rules were prompted by the Recommendation of the Interbranch 

Commission on Juvenile Justice (ICJJ). On page 46 of the ICJJ Report, the ICJJ 

recommended the need for “masters to be properly educated about the Juvenile Act, 

child development, and problems unique to the relationship between children and their 

families.” Further, the ICJJ recommended that the Supreme Court develop mandatory 

continuing education standards for juvenile masters. See ICJJ Report at pg. 46. 

In addition to the recommended educational requirements by the ICJJ for 

“delinquency” matters of juvenile court, the Committee believes educational 

requirements are just as important and necessary for “dependency” matters. 

The purpose of these rule additions is to provide a minimum standard for 

education, experience, and training of masters. Judicial districts are encouraged to 

provide additional educational and training courses for its masters. 

Rules 182 and 1182 - Qualifications of Master

These new rules govern the qualifications of masters. Prior to presiding over 

juvenile cases, these attorneys must be a member, in good standing, of the Bar of this 

Commonwealth, have been licensed to practice law for five consecutive years, and 

have completed the initial basic training course(s). This basic knowledge of juvenile law 

and experience as an attorney is essential before an attorney may be appointed as a 

master. 

In addition, these attorneys should have experience in diverse cases. It would be 

beneficial if the attorney handled juvenile cases prior to becoming a master with 

experience with several different types of allegations and at different stages of the 

process, including detention or shelter-care hearings, adjudicatory hearings, transfer or 

permanency hearings, dispositional hearings, and dispositional review hearings. 

After the initial training requirement has been met, attorneys are required to 

continue their legal education by attending a mandatory course(s) offered by the 

Juvenile Court Judges’ Commission or the Office of Children and Families in the Courts. 

Because masters are judicial officers, this requirement is an additional requirement to 

the Pa.R.C.L.E. because it mandates education specifically in juvenile delinquency or 

dependency law; whereas the Pa.R.C.L.E. do not mandate specific training areas. See 

paragraph (B). Six hours of this specific education must be completed every two years. 
2

However, these hours will count towards the twelve hours of continuing legal education 

mandated each year by Pa.R.C.L.E. 105.

Pursuant to paragraph (C), attorneys must attest that they have met the 

requirements of this rule prior to appointment as master to preside over juvenile 

matters. Every two years after the initial appointment as master, masters must submit a 

new affidavit attesting that they have met the continuing education requirements of 

paragraph (B).
The Making of 

NIST SPECIAL DATABASE 302

07 November 2018

Gregory Fiumara

greg@nist.gov

The Making of 

NIST SPECIAL DATABASE 302

07 November 2018

Gregory Fiumara

greg@nist.gov
Special

Database

27
Certain commercial equipment, instruments, or materials are identified in this presentation in order to specify procedures adequately. Such identification is not intended to

imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the materials or equipment identified are

necessarily the best available for the purpose.

About 108,000 results
Discontinued
Special

Database

27

“It has been determined 

that this dataset lacks the 

documentation required 

by NIST for distribution.”

NIST SPECIAL DATABASE

SERIES 300
SPECIAL DATABASE 300

Uncompressed plain and rolled fingerprint images from ink cards
SPECIAL DATABASE 301

IARPA Nail to Nail Fingerprint Challenge “Dry Run”
SPECIAL DATABASE 302
Latent Dataset Lifecycle

Plan/Prep Collect Develop Digitize Enhance Segment Distribute

Time Cost Space Realism

Collection Constraints
Time Cost Space Realism

Collection Constraints
Time Cost Space Realism

Collection Constraints
Time Cost Space Realism

Collection Constraints
Latent Kits
Plan/Prep Collect Develop Digitize Enhance Segment Distribute



Plan/Prep Collect Develop Digitize Enhance Segment Distribute




Plan/Prep Collect Develop Digitize Enhance Segment Distribute
https://github.com/usnistgov/nistscan
Plan/Prep Collect Develop Digitize Enhance Segment Distribute

Plan/Prep Collect Develop Digitize Enhance Segment Distribute



Latent Dataset Lifecycle

Plan/Prep Collect Develop Digitize Enhance Segment Distribute
Fool me once...

✅Human Subjects Protection

✅Institutional Review Board

✅Chief counsel review

✅SP 800-30 Privacy Risk Assessment Methodology 

DoC Privacy Program

✅Privacy Threshold Analysis

✅Privacy Impact Assessment

✅SP 800-53 Rev 4 Appendix J Privacy Controls

...and more
Latent Dataset Lifecycle

Plan/Prep Collect Develop Digitize Enhance Segment Distribute

fingerprint_data+subscribe@list.nist.gov

Annotate
H. Res. 233

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 18, 1997.

Whereas the privilege of admission to the Hall of the House

or rooms leading thereto is subject to the requirements

of proper decorum;

Whereas concern has arisen that the privilege of admission to

the Hall of the House or rooms leading thereto has become the subject of abuse;

Whereas Representative Menendez of New Jersey has given

notice pursuant to clause 2 of rule IX of his intention to

offer a question of the privileges of the House addressing

that concern; and

Whereas these circumstances warrant an immediate affirmation by the House of its unequivocal commitment to the

principle that every person who exercises the privilege of

admission to the Hall of the House or rooms leading

thereto assumes a concomitant responsibilty to comport

himself in a manner that properly dignifies the proceedings of the House: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the Sergeant-at-Arms is instructed to remove former Representative Robert Dornan from the Hall of

the House and rooms leading thereto and to prevent him

from returning to the Hall of the House and rooms leading
2

•HRES 233 EH

thereto until the election contest concerning the forty-sixth

district of California is resolved.

Attest:

Clerk.
Motion Granted , Appeal Dismissed , and Memorandum Opinion filed

December 5 , 2019
.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 19

- 00668

- CV
BURCKHARDT COMPRESSION NORTH AMERICA SERVICES LLC, BURCKHARDT COMPRESSION AG, AND BURCKHARDT

COMPRESSION (US) INC. , Appellant s

V. DANIEL B. CANNON AND ARKOS FIELD SERVICES, LP , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018

- 87696

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an interlocutory appeal from a n order si gned August 14, 2019 , denying a motion to compel arbitration and stay trial court proceedings . On November 25, 2019, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted , and the appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Bourliot

.
Exhibit 10.9

Annual Cash Compensation of Executive Officers

The named
executive officers of Stereotaxis, Inc. (the Company) have their base salaries determined yearly by the Compensation Committee (the Committee) of the Board of Directors. The named executive officers are all at
will employees, and each has a written employment agreement which is filed, as required, as an exhibit to reports filed by the Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On February 15, 2011, the Compensation Committee determined
the 2011 base salaries for named executive officers of the Company and the payments to be made under the Companys 2010 bonus program (the 2010 Program) to the named executive officers, as set forth below. The 2010 Program was
designed to reward the accomplishments of these officers on behalf of the Company in 2010 pursuant to and consistent with the objective of the Companys bonus plan, as determined by the Committee. The 2010 base salaries, 2010 bonuses, and 2011
base salaries are summarized in the following table:



|                                                                         |  |             |         |  |            |   |        |             |  |   |         | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------- | ------- |  | ---------- | - | ------ | ----------- |  | - | ------- | 
|                                                                         |  | 2010 Salary |         |  | 2010 Bonus |   |        | 2011 Salary | 
|Douglas M. Bruce
Chief Technology/Operations Officer                     |  | $           | 320,000 |  |            | $ | 42,000 |             |  | $ | 325,000 | 
|Frank J. Cheng
Senior Vice President, Marketing and Business Development |  | $           | 275,000 |  |            | $ | 50,000 |             |  | $ | 285,000 | 
|David A. Giffin
Vice President, Human Resources                          |  | $           | 187,000 |  |            | $ | 25,000 |             |  | $ | 200,000 | 
|Daniel J. Johnston
Chief Financial Officer                               |  | $           | 320,000 |  |            | $ | 45,000 |             |  | $ | 325,000 | 
|Michael P. Kaminski
President & Chief Executive Officer                  |  | $           | 400,000 |  |            | $ | 50,000 |             |  | $ | 440,000 | 

The
Company intends to provide additional information regarding other compensation awarded to the named executive officers in respect of and during the 2010 fiscal year in the proxy statement for its 2011 annual meeting of stockholders, which is
expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in April 2011.

As determined by the
Committee at the February 15, 2011 meeting, the 2011 annual bonus program will be based on management achieving certain levels of operating profit, new orders, revenue, electrophysiology procedures performed using Stereotaxis equipment, and the
performance of the individual employee as it relates to strategic initiatives.
Exhibit10-39






EXHIBIT 10.39 







FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Navistar 1998 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan is hereby terminated effective upon approval by the shareowners of the Navistar International Corporation 2004 Performance Incentive Plan, which stock plan will supercede the 1998 Non-Employee Directors Plan. 





































































































E-7
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**






**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**






**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**






**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In connection with the Quarterly Report of XFormity Technologies, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), we,
      Christopher Ball, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jack Rabin, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.




/s/
      Christopher
      Ball




Christopher
      Ball, Chief Executive Officer




November
      20, 2006






/s/
      Jack
      Rabin




Jack
      Rabin, Chief Financial Officer




November
      20, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 373 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 373

                   Commending democracy in Botswana.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 1998

   Mr. Royce (for himself, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Payne, and Mr. Menendez) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                       on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
                   Commending democracy in Botswana.

Whereas Sir Ketumile Masire has been involved in politics in his country since 
        he co-founded the Bechuanaland Democratic Party (later the Botswana 
        Democratic Party) with Seretse Khama in 1962;
Whereas Sir Ketumile Masire was elected to Botswana's first Parliament in 1965, 
        later became Vice President under President Seretse Khama, and succeeded 
        President Khama as President upon his death in 1980;
Whereas under President Masire's administration Botswana has maintained a 
        successful multiparty constitutional democracy with regular free and 
        fair elections;
Whereas President Masire plans to retire from the presidency on March 31, 1998;
Whereas the Government of Botswana has worked constructively with the 
        Organization of African Unity, the Southern African Development 
        Community, and other organizations to promote democracy in Africa;
Whereas Botswana is a long standing friend of the United States and was selected 
        as the site of a major Voice of America radio relay station because of 
        its stability; and
Whereas President Clinton plans to enhance United States relations with Botswana 
        through an upcoming official visit to Botswana: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends the people of Botswana for their commitment to 
        democracy;
            (2) commends Sir Ketumile Masire for his long and 
        distinguished service to his country and the cause of democracy 
        in Africa;
            (3) calls on President Masire's successor to pursue the 
        course set by President Masire by maintaining a democratic 
        Botswana;
            (4) calls on the Government of Botswana to continue playing 
        a positive role in African and world affairs; and
            (5) encourages the Government of Botswana to continue 
        promoting peace, democracy, respect for human rights, and 
        economic reform in Africa.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 153 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          May 21, 1997.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 408) to amend the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 to support the 
International Dolphin Conservation Program in the eastern tropical Pacific 
Ocean, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed 
with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Resources. After general debate the bill shall be considered 
for amendment under the five-minute rule. In lieu of the amendment recommended 
by the Committee on Resources now printed in the bill, it shall be in order to 
consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute 
rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the Congressional 
Record and numbered 1 pursuant to clause 6 of rule XXIII. That amendment shall 
be considered as read. Points of order against that amendment for failure to 
comply with clause 7 of rule XVI are waived. No amendment to that amendment 
shall be in order except the amendment printed in the Congressional Record 
pursuant to clause 6 of rule XXIII, which may be offered only by Representative 
Miller of California or his designee, shall be considered as read, shall be 
debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 
opponent, and shall not be subject to amendment. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 
bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may 
demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of 
the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of a substitute made in 
order as original text. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion 
except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 387 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 387

Prohibiting the payment of any amount from the reserve fund established 
 for unanticipated expenses of committees without the approval of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 1998

Mr. Hoyer (for himself, Mr. Gejdenson, Ms. Kilpatrick, Mr. Moakley, Mr. 
  Frost, Mr. Hall of Ohio, and Ms. Slaughter) submitted the following 
        resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Prohibiting the payment of any amount from the reserve fund established 
 for unanticipated expenses of committees without the approval of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That no amount may be paid from the reserve fund 
established for unanticipated expenses of committees pursuant to clause 
5(a) of rule XI of the Rules of the House of Representatives unless the 
payment of such amount is approved by the House.
                                 <all>
```
AGREEMENT TO AMEND/EXTEND
                             WATER SERVICE AGREEMENT
                                     FOR THE
                                  SKY RANCH PUD
                                                                 January  6,2004
                                                                 ---------------

RE:  Water  Service  Agreement  dated  October 31. 2003  by  and between AIRPARK
                                       ----------------
     METROPOLITAN  DISTRICT  ("AMD");  ICON  INVESTORS 1 LLC ("DEVELOPER"); PURE
     CYCLE  CORPORATION  ("PURECYCLE");  and  RANGE  VIEW  METROPOLITAN DISTRICT
     ("RANGEVIEW")  relating to the provision of water services to the Sky Ranch
     PUD  (Arapahoe  County  case  No.  Z01-010).


This  Amendment,  dated January 6. 2004, shall amend the aforesaid water service
                        ---------------
agreement  as  follows:

     Section  10.02, Termination Contingency, Subsection (c) shall be amended to
     read  as  follows:

(c)  Water  Rights.  If  AMD  or  the DEVELOPER are unsatisfied with the opinion
     -------------
     of water counsel provided pursuant to Section 6.03(e), AMD or the DEVELOPER
     shall  have  the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice
     to  RANGEVIEW  and  PURECYCLE.  In no event shall AMD or DEVELOPER have the
     right  to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section after the Board
     of  County  Commissioners of Arapahoe County has approved the PDP, or March
     6,  2004,  whichever  is  latest.

AIRPARK  METROPOLITAN  DISTRICT

By:  /s/  Andrew  R.  Klein
     ----------------------------------
     Andrew  R.  Klein,  President

ICON  INVESTORS  I  LLC

By:  AIRWAY  PARK  MANAGER,  LLC,  A  COLORADO  LIMITED  LIABILITY  COMPANY

By:  /s/  Andrew  R.  Klein
     ----------------------------------
     Andrew  R.  Klein,  its  Manager


PURE  CYCLE  CORPORATION,  A  DELAWARE  CORPORATION

By:  /s/  Mark  Harding
     ----------------------------------
     Mark  Harding,  President


RANGEVIEW  METROPOLITAN  DISTRICT

By:  /s/  Thomas  P.  Clark
     ----------------------------------
     Thomas  P.  Clark,  Director


<PAGE>