alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
9851.

#### Osterholtz *v.*The State.

Decided October 14, 1918.

Accusation of unlawful possession of liquor; from city court of Savannah—Judge Kourke. April 20, 19Í8.

*Robert L. Golding,*for plaintiff in error.

*Walter G. Hartridge,*solicitor-general, contra.

Bloodwoetii, J.^

The accused was tried by the judge without the intervention of a jury. There was sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction, and this court will not interfere with the discretion of the trial judge in overruling the motion for new trial, which was based on general grounds only.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 255 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 30, 1997.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 1370) to reauthorize the Export-Import Bank of the United States. The 
first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be 
confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Banking and Financial Services. After general debate the bill shall be 
considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to 
consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute 
rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 
Banking and Financial Services now printed in the bill. The committee amendment 
in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. Points of order 
against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute for failure to 
comply with clause 7 of rule XVI are waived. No amendment to the committee 
amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed 
in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each 
amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 
only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be 
debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by 
the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 
be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 
Committee of the Whole. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) 
postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole 
a request for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes 
the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows 
another electronic vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum 
time for electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 
fifteen minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment 
the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments 
as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on 
any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the 
committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall 
be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Paula Jones,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03881-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8531 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 1
FILED 5/29/2020

THOMAS G. BRUTON CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

AC

1:20-CV-03254 

JUDGE BUCKLO

MAGISTRATE JUDGE WEISMAN

Case: 1:20-cv-03254 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/29/20 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1
Case: 1:20-cv-03254 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/29/20 Page 2 of 13 PageID #:2
Case: 1:20-cv-03254 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/29/20 Page 3 of 13 PageID #:3
Case: 1:20-cv-03254 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/29/20 Page 4 of 13 PageID #:4
Case: 1:20-cv-03254 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/29/20 Page 5 of 13 PageID #:5
Case: 1:20-cv-03254 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/29/20 Page 6 of 13 PageID #:6
Case: 1:20-cv-03254 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/29/20 Page 7 of 13 PageID #:7
Case: 1:20-cv-03254 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/29/20 Page 8 of 13 PageID #:8
Case: 1:20-cv-03254 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/29/20 Page 9 of 13 PageID #:9
Case: 1:20-cv-03254 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/29/20 Page 10 of 13 PageID #:10
Case: 1:20-cv-03254 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/29/20 Page 11 of 13 PageID #:11
Case: 1:20-cv-03254 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/29/20 Page 12 of 13 PageID #:12
Case: 1:20-cv-03254 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/29/20 Page 13 of 13 PageID #:13
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-4825

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

ANSELMO LEONIDAS RIVAS-LOVO, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:08-cr-00064-HEH-1) 

Submitted: April 21, 2009 Decided: June 11, 2009 

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Paul G. Gill, 

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellant. Dana J. Boente, Acting United States Attorney, 

Richard D. Cooke, S. David Schiller, Assistant United States 

Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

 Anselmo Leonidas Rivas-Lovo pleaded guilty to illegal 

reentry after deportation following a conviction for an 

aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(2) 

(2006). He was sentenced to fifty months of imprisonment. 

Rivas-Lovo appeals his sentence, arguing that the sentence is 

substantively unreasonable. Finding no error, we affirm. 

 A sentence is reviewed for reasonableness, applying an 

abuse of discretion standard. Gall v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 

586, 597 (2007); see also United States v. Abu Ali, 528 F.3d 

210, 260 (4th Cir. 2008), cert. denied, 129 S. Ct. 1312 (2009). 

The appellate court must first determine whether the district 

court committed any “significant procedural error,” Gall, 128 S. 

Ct. at 597, and then consider the substantive reasonableness of 

the sentence, applying a presumption of reasonableness to a 

sentence within the guidelines range. Abu Ali, 528 F.3d at 261; 

see also Gall, 128 S. Ct. at 597; Rita v. United States, 551 

U.S. 338, ___, 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462-69 (2007) (upholding 

presumption of reasonableness for within-guidelines sentence). 

 Rivas-Lovo argues that the presumption of 

reasonableness should not apply to his sentence because the 

guideline under which he was sentenced is not based on empirical 

study conducted by the Sentencing Commission. We disagree and 

apply a presumption of reasonableness to Rivas-Lovo’s 

2 
3 

within-guidelines sentence. See United States v. 

Mondragon-Santiago, __ F.3d __, __, 2009 WL 782894, at *9 (5th 

Cir. Mar. 26, 2009). 

 Rivas-Lovo next argues that his sentence is 

unreasonable because it does not further the sentencing goals 

contained in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2006). We have reviewed the 

record and conclude that Rivas-Lovo has failed to rebut the 

presumption of reasonableness. We thus find the sentence 

reasonable. 

 We therefore affirm the judgment of the district 

court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350

                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, KUO-AN WANG, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) of Kid Castle Educational Corporation (the "Registrant"), certifies
that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



                                           /s/ Kuo-An Wang
                                           ---------------------------
                                           Name: Kuo-An Wang
                                           Date: August 14, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sand Hill IT Security  Acquisition Corp.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
each of the  undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates  indicated  below,
hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



March 29, 2005                             By:   /s/ Humphrey P. Polanen
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           Humphrey P. Polanen
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive
                                           Officer



March 29, 2005                             By:    /s/ Keith Walz
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           Keith Walz
                                           Chief Financial Officer and
                                           President



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### BLACKWELL v. MULTI FOODS MANAGEMENT, INC.

No. 237P97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 189

Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 23 July 1997.
Exhibit 4.2  


Attached
hereto as Exhibit 4.2 is the Employment Agreement, by and between ARCADIS NV and C. Michiel Jaski, an Executive Board member, dated January 20, 2000. Pursuant to the Employment
Agreement, C. Michiel Jaski was appointed to the Executive Board. The Employment Agreement contains no termination date. 



The
Employment Agreement sets forth Mr. Jaski's fixed salary, variable salary, pension, compensation and other fringe benefits, as more fully described in this annual report on
Form 20-F. The Employment Agreement also provides that the collective labor agreement that applies to ARCADIS' other employees also applies to Mr. Jaski. 









	

 	

 




[ARCADIS LETTERHEAD]


PERSOONLIJK
  De Heer ir. C.M. Jaski

Nateley House

Ridgeway, Perford

SURREY, GU22 BPW

United
Kingdom                                        
        KOPIE



OnderWerp:
 Benoeming tot lid van de Raad van Bestuur ARCADIS NV  


Arnhem,

20 januari 2000 


Geachte
heer Jaski, 


De
Raad van Commissarissen heeft besloten u te benoemen tot lid van de Raad van Bestuur van ARCADIS NV. De datum waarop deze benoeming van kracht wordt zal in overleg met u worden vastgesteld en zal
liggen tussen 1 maart en 1 mei 2000. 


De
volgende arbeidsvoorwaarden gelden voor u. 


Salaris

Het totaal bruto salaris bedraagt met ingang van de datum indiensttreding NLG 439.000,- per jaar (dit zal in maandelijkse termijnen van NLG 36.583,—aan u worden uitbetaald). Dit salaris is
exclusief 8% vakantietoeslag en 2% decemberuitkering. 


Pensioen

U wordt aangemeld als deelnemer aan de pensioenregeling bij de Stichting Pensioenfonds ARCADIS Nederland. 


Tantième

Voor uw functie geldt een door de Raad van Commissarissen vast te stellen tantième. Het uit te keren bedrag wordt jaarlijks bepaald na vaststelling van de jaarrekening, op basis van de
resultaten van ARCADIS NV. Het tantièmebedrag bedraagt maximaal vier maanden salaris. Bij beëindiging van uw functie in de Raad van bestuur en voortzetting van het
dientsverband vervalt deze regeling. De tantième is niet pensioendragend. 



Representatievergoeding

De representatievergoeding bedraagt NLG 850,—per maand, gedurende de vervulling van uw functie in de Raad van Bestuur. 


ARCADIS IS DE NIEUWE WERELDWIJDE NAAM VAN HIEDEMIJ







 

Telefoonkostenvergoeding

Voor de uitoefening van uw functie is een privé-telefoonaansluiting noodzakelijk met een vergoeding van kosten volgens de regeling telefoonkostenvergoeding. 



Auto-regeling

U krijgt een leaseauto ter beschikking volgens de vigerende regeling voor leden van de Raad van Bestuur. 


CAO

Voor het overige zijn bepalingen uit de raam-CAO voor ARCADIS op u van toepassing. 


Standplaats

Uw standplaats is Arnhem 


Wij
verzoeken u bijgaande kopie van dit schrijven door u voor akkoord getekend terug te zenden aan het secretariaat van de Raad van Bestuur. 


Wij
wensen u veel succes toe bij de vervulling van uw nieuwe functie en rekenen op een vruchtbare samenwerking. 



	Met vriendelijke groet,

ARCADIS NV	 	Voor akkoord:
	/s/ L.M. Van Leeuwen	 	/s/ C.M. Jaski
	prof. dr. L.M. van Leeuwen

waarnemend voorzitter

Raad van Commissarissen	 	ir C.M. Jaski








2
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 933

To expand the definition of limited tax benefit for purposes of the Line

Item Veto Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 5, 1997

Mr. BARRETT of Wisconsin introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on the Budget

A BILL

To expand the definition of limited tax benefit for purposes

of the Line Item Veto Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET

4 ACT.

5 Section 1026(9) of the Congressional Budget and Im6 poundment Control Act of 1974 (as added by the Line

7 Item Veto Act) is amended to read as follows:

8 ‘‘(9) LIMITED TAX BENEFIT.—The term ‘lim9 ited tax benefit’ means any tax provision that has

10 the practical effect of providing a benefit in the form
2

HR 933 IH

1 of different treatment to a particular taxpayer or a

2 limited class of taxpayers, whether or not such provi3 sion is limited by its terms to a particular taxpayer

4 or class of taxpayers.’’.

Æ
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEVE W. CHENNAULT, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

MORRIS, Registered Dietician, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 16-55878 

D.C. No. 3:13-cv-00854-BTM-KSC 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Barry Ted Moskowitz, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 26, 2017**

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Steve W. Chennault appeals pro se from the district court’s summary 

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to a 

serious medical need. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review 

de novo. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 5 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 16-55878 

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Chennault

failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Appellee was 

deliberately indifferent in providing care following Chennault’s tonsillectomy or 

otherwise personally participated in the deprivation of his constitutional rights. 

See id. at 1057 (a prison official acts with deliberate indifference only if he or she

knows of and disregards an excessive risk to an inmate’s health); see also Starr v. 

Baca, 652 F.3d 1202, 1207 (9th Cir. 2011) (a supervisor is liable under § 1983 

only if he or she is personally involved in the constitutional deprivation or there is 

a “sufficient causal connection between the supervisor’s wrongful conduct and the 

constitutional violation” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

AFFIRMED.
#### STATE v. JACKSON

No. 244PA97

Case below: 126 N.C.App. 129

Petition by Attorney General for writ of supersedeas allowed 23 July 1997. Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 23 July 1997.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 32 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      January 21, 1997.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and they are hereby, elected 
to the following standing committees:
    Committee on Banking: Mr. LaTourette to rank following Mr. Sessions.
    Committee on Education and the Workforce: Mr. Paul, Mr. Bob Schaffer of 
Colorado, Mr. Peterson of Pennsylvania, Mr. Upton, Mr. Deal of Georgia, Mr. 
Hilleary, and Mr. Scarborough, all to rank in the named order following Mr. 
Norwood of Georgia.
    Committee on Government Reform and Oversight: Mr. Barr of Georgia to rank 
following Mr. Snowbarger.
    Committee on International Relations: Mr. Brady to rank following Mr. Moran 
of Kansas.
    Committee on Resources: Mr. Crapo to rank following Mr. Gibbons.
    Committee on Science: Mr. Boehlert, Mr. Fawell, Mrs. Morella, Mr. Weldon of 
Pennsylvania, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Barton of Texas, Mr. Calvert, Mr. 
Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Ehlers, Mr. Weldon of Florida, Mr. Salmon, Mr. Davis, 
Mr. Gutknecht, Mr. Foley, Mr. Ewing, Mr. Pickering, Mr. Cannon, Mr. Brady, and 
Mr. Cook.
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. Combest, Mr. Hefley, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. 
Bartlett of Maryland, Mrs. Smith of Washington, Mr. LoBiondo, Mrs. Kelly, Mr. 
Jones, Mr. Souder, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Ryun, Mr. Snowbarger, Mr. Pappas, Mr. 
English, Mr. McIntosh, and Mrs. Emerson.
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. 
Spence, Mr. Everett, Mr. Buyer, Mr. Quinn, Mr. Bachus, Mr. Stearns, Mr. Dan 
Schaefer of Colorado, Mr. Moran of Kansas, Mr. Cooksey, Mr. Hutchinson, Mr. 
Hunter, Mr. Hayworth, and Mrs. Chenoweth.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"I am Artemis: Tracy Gill","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"1JEZLmFxya\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people-of-nasa\/i-am-artemis-tracy-gill\/\">I am Artemis: Tracy Gill<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people-of-nasa\/i-am-artemis-tracy-gill\/embed\/#?secret=1JEZLmFxya\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“I am Artemis: Tracy Gill” — NASA\" data-secret=\"1JEZLmFxya\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/i_am_artemis_template_gill_t.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}