alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         125,049
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   93,567
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (9,960)
<INVENTORY>                                     98,581
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               310,518
<PP&E>                                       1,044,724
<DEPRECIATION>                               (426,768)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 950,974
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          413,890
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                1
<PREFERRED>                                  1,514,661
<COMMON>                                         8,280
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,219,403)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   950,974
<SALES>                                        689,289
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               689,289
<CGS>                                          362,569
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  362,569
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,389,911
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,937
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (943,011)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (943,011)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (943,011)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)


</TABLE>
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In the matter of J.B.

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00844

- CV

Trial court case number: 2013

- 02490J

Trial court: 314th District Court of Harris County

On January 2 9, 2014, this Court ordered appellant to work with the trial court clerk to obtain a copy of a certification of a right to appeal. On February 10, 2014, appellant filed a notice of compliance, indicating the trial court signed a certification that day, an d that he had requested the trial court clerk to supplement the record with the certification. On March 18, the trial court clerk filed an information sheet indicating “[a]s of this date the Certificate mentioned in the Appellants Notice of Compliance has yet to be found or imaged. Said document is not in the physical file either. Although we are working with the court to see that it is found, we have no way to determine when the Supplemental Clerk’s Record will be done.”

We ORDER the supplemental record to be filed within 10 days of the date of this order.

If the certification referenced in appellant’s notice of compliance cannot be found, the trial court shall prepare a replacement certification within the same 10 day period.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’ s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

X Act ing individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 1, 2014
Subject: EXT :FW: NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 Concept Paper Feedback 

Date: Thursday, March 9, 2023 1:30:30 PM 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening 

attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. 

FYI 

Sent: Monday, February 27, 2023 1:25 PM 

To: cyberframework <cyberframework@nist.gov> 

Subject: NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 Concept Paper Feedback 

Hi Team, 

I would like to start by acknowledging the great value that NIST CSF has provided to the 

cybersecurity community. 

Below are my comments and feedback on the concept paper: 

Section 3 page 8: It is great to have guidance on how to implement the framework however, a 

key a challenge to many organisations is to show RoI and value of the implementation. Would 

be great to include guidance or example of how to monitor, track and report on progress, 

increase in maturity as well as RoI (maybe risk reduction vs investment) 

Section 3.1 page 8/Section 3.2 Page 9: What are the ways to allow for wider community 

contributions for adding implementation examples and assisting tools? Maybe have a Github 

repository that would avail this to the wider community and the community can contribute to 

it continuously. 

Section 4.1 page 11: Below are the areas that I believe should be part of the new Govern 

function: 

ID.AM-6 

ID.BE [gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com] 

ID.GV 

ID.RM 

ID.SC-1 

Section 4.1 page 11: In a world that is moving to AI, automation and DevOps how does the 

Govern function is integrated into a rapid environment without slowing down the business. 

Guidance on methods and ways of implementing security governance in a rapidly changing 

environment without slowing business outcomes should be introduced or referenced. 

Section 5.1 Page 12: Supply Chain should extend to include software such as open source 

software libraries used in an organisation applications and the applications used by the 

organisation. 
Section 6.4 Page 14: Implementation tiers are to a degree confusing for many especially small 

to medium organisations. While they are good at capturing a current state of how far risk is 

integrated in cybersecurity it confuses these organisations in terms of how to move forward 

and get better. Tiers could be consolidated and added to become one of the subcategories of 

Govern functions where an organisation can assess and track their maturity on viewing and 

managing risks. 

Best Regards, 

Ahmed Ali
#### Joseph Richardson *v.*Commonwealth.

Intoxicating Liquors — Keeping Tippling House — Selling for Another.

The liquor sold by appellant belonged to Mrs. De Spain, and was sold by appellant for her in her barroom, where she had a lawful right to sell it; and there is an utter failure to make out the offense of keeping a tippling house against Mm.

APPEAL PROM GREEN CIRCUIT COURT.

December 11, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

Appellant was indicted in the Green circuit court for keeping a tippling house, and on the trial was found guilty of the offense charged, and judgment rendered against him for sixty dollars.

It appears from the evidence that appellant, attendant at the bar of Mrs. Despain, who was at the time a tavern keeper with a license to sell liquor at that place during the May election, 1869, and sold liquor for her which was drunk at her tavern house and that was all the selling he did.

The liquor sold by appellant belonged to Mrs. Despain, and was doubtless sold for her in her barroom where she had the lawful right to sell it, and there is an utter failure of proof to make out the offense of keeping a tippling house against appellant.

•But from the argument of counsel, and the last paragraph of the instruction given by the court to the jury, it would seem that although indicted for keeping a tippling house he was fined for selling liquor without having taken the oath prescribed to be taken by persons applying for license to keep a tavern before such licenses shall be granted to them, under the act approved February 21, 1863, Myers’ Supp. 518. The reason for that law requiring that oath to be taken has ceased, and the law itself may be regarded as inoperative if not within the spirit of the act approved February 15, 1866. Myers’ Supp. 737.

But, if that were not so, this judgment cannot be sustained on another ground. By the third section of the act of 1863, *supra,*it is provided that for a failure to take the prescribed oath the persons described in the first and second sections thereof shall be subject to the penalties provided by law against selling by *435retail without a license, and to be recovered in the same way. And by section 1 of article 5, chapter 99, 2 R. S. 412, the punishment for selling by retail is a fine of twenty dollars for each offense.

*J. C.*Rush, *for appellant.*

The charge in the indictment was not in any view of the case sustained by the evidence. Wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to dismiss the indictment.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 337 Agreed to House (ATH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 337

            Providing for the hour of meeting of the House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 1998

Mr. Armey submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
            Providing for the hour of meeting of the House.

    Resolved, That unless otherwise ordered, before Monday, May 18, 
1998, the hour of daily meeting of the House shall be 2:00 p.m. on 
Mondays; 11:00 a.m. on Tuesdays; and 10:00 a.m. on all other days of 
the week; and from Monday, May 18, 1998, until the end of the second 
session, the hour of daily meeting of the House shall be noon on 
Mondays; 10:00 a.m. on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays; and 9:00 
a.m. on all other days of the week.
                                 <all>
```
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 906

To provide for a reduced rate of postage for certain mailings that, under

Federal or State law, are required to be made by local governments.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 3, 1997

Mr. MCINTOSH (for himself, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. DAVIS of

Virginia, Mr. FROST, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. CONDIT, Mrs. MYRICK, Ms.

LOFGREN, and Mr. MORAN of Virginia) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To provide for a reduced rate of postage for certain mailings

that, under Federal or State law, are required to be

made by local governments.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDUCED RATE OF POSTAGE.

4 The United States Postal Service shall establish a

5 discount presort first-class postage rate for specified local

6 governmental mailings—
2

•HR 906 IH

1 (1) that are mandated by Federal or State law,

2 such as property tax statements, summonses, and

3 jury-duty pay; but

4 (2) for which no Federal or State funds are

5 provided to local governments to defray the associ6 ated administrative costs.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

HHS gives notice concerning the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a class of employees from the General Atomics facility in La Jolla, California, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director, Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, NIOSH, 1090 Tusculum Avenue, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226-1938, Telephone 877-222-7570. Information requests can also be submitted by email to                         *DCAS@CDC.GOV.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority:42 U.S.C. 7384q(b). 42 U.S.C. 7384*l*                        (14)(C).                    

On September 25, 2014, as provided for under the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:

All Atomic Weapons Employees who worked for General Atomics at its facility in La Jolla, California, during the period from January 1, 1960, through December 31, 1969, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees included in the Special Exposure Cohort.

This designation became effective on October 25, 2014. Therefore, beginning on October 25, 2014, members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this notice, became members of the SEC.

John Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 2014-26340 Filed 11-4-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 216 (Friday, November 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 66386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26477]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; PAR-14-008: Secondary Analysis to Explore NIMH Research 
Domain Criteria.
    Date: November 19, 2014.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Julius Cinque, MS, Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 5186, MSC 7846, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-
1252, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#690a0007181c0c03290a1a1b47070001470e061f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e2818b8c93978788a2819190cc8c8b8acc858d94">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 4, 2014.
Carolyn Baum,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-26477 Filed 11-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the quarterly report of Xponential, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB forthe quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert W. Schleizer, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and          2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial conditions and results of operations of the Company.     Date: November 13, 2006 s/ Robert W. Schleizer         Robert W. Schleizer    Executive Vice President and Chief    Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 10.2



                       Description of Registration Rights


      During  the  three  months  ended  March 31,  2004,  the  Company  granted
registration  rights  to  certain  investors  in  connection  with  the sale and
issuance to such investors (the  "Offering") of an aggregate of 4,450,000 shares
of our common stock and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares of
our common stock (collectively, the "Registrable Securities"). Such registration
rights provide that the Company shall file a Registration Statement covering the
Registrable  Securities  and,  not later than June 30, 2004  ("Target  Effective
Date"), the Registration Statement shall be declared effective by the Securities
and Exchange Commission. If the Registration Statement is not declared effective
on or before the Target Effective Date, then commencing on the first day of each
month following the Target  Effective Date until the earlier of December 1, 2004
or the actual date the Registration Statement is declared effective, the Company
shall issue to the investor, as liquidated damages, such number of shares of our
common  stock  that  equals  10% of the  number of shares  of our  common  stock
purchased by the investor in the Offering.
#### W. J. Stephens *v.*N. E. Boswell.

Attachment — Sale of Personal Property to Avoid Debt — Possession by Vendor.

Where a debtor sells personal property and still retains the posses-' sion it will be presumed that the sale is fraudulent as- to attaching creditor.

APPEAL FROM KENTON CIRCUIT COURT.

January 18, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor.

There was never any change of possession of the household furniture under the pretended sale by Williams to his brother-*99in-law, Stephens. The property sold consisted oí furniture in the home where Williams and- his family had 'been living for months; had been purchased by Williams or his wife and used and owned by them until about the time that Williams left Covington for St. Louis. He then pretends to have sold it to appellant and delivered him the keys of the house. The wife of Williams did not accompany him to St. Louis, but remained in the home, expecting her husband’s return from the latter place. The furniture was packed and boxed to be shipped to St. Louis' when appellee’s attachment was levied upon it. Upon the execution ®f the bond for the forthcoming of the property, etc., it was shipped to St. Louis, and there again placed in the home of Williams, and used by him, or his family, except a portion of it that Mrs. Williams says was sold and the proceeds paid over to appellant. We are driven to the conclusion from the facts proven that the object of this sale was to avoid the payment of the debts of Williams and that the court below properly sustained the attachment.

*Carlisle, for appellant.*

*Fists, for appellee.*
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 215 (Thursday, November 6, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 66030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26372]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

United States Mint


Pricing for the American $1 Coin and Currency Set

AGENCY: United States Mint, Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Mint is announcing a price of $13.95 for the 
American $1 Coin and Currency Set.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marc Landry, Acting Associate Director 
for Sales and Marketing; United States Mint; 801 9th Street NW., 
Washington, DC 20220; or call 202-354-7500.

    Authority:  31 U.S.C. 5111, 5112 & 9701.

    Dated: November 3, 2014.
Beverly Ortega Babers,
Chief Administrative Officer, United States Mint.
[FR Doc. 2014-26372 Filed 11-5-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-37-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Ann M. Harkey","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/aharkey\/","title":"NASA-Developed Spherical Robots to the Rescue","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"tyb9aRKJjv\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/technology\/tech-transfer-spinoffs\/nasa-developed-spherical-robots-to-the-rescue\/\">NASA-Developed Spherical Robots to the Rescue<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/technology\/tech-transfer-spinoffs\/nasa-developed-spherical-robots-to-the-rescue\/embed\/#?secret=tyb9aRKJjv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA-Developed Spherical Robots to the Rescue” — NASA\" data-secret=\"tyb9aRKJjv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/04-drone-with-squishy-3.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":492}