alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 4.6

                            VIPER MOTORCYCLE COMPANY

                                  AMENDMENT TO

                      SERIES A 16% CONVERTIBLE SECURED NOTE

Serial No. __-A                                               [Date of Issuance]

                         Principal Amount: $___________

       The parties hereto entered into a Promissory Note (Series A 16%
Convertible Secured Note), dated _____________ with Viper Motorcycle Company as
the Maker and the undersigned Note Holder, __________, in the original principal
amount of $___________.

       FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION:

       Maker and Note holder hereby agree to the following amendments to the
terms of such Note:

       (1)    The maturity of the Note is eighteen (18) month's after the date
              of the Note, with no earlier maturity option as had been
              originally stated in the Note.

       (2)    The conversion rights set forth in Section 8 of the original Note
              shall be replaced as follows:

              CONVERSION RIGHTS. The principal of this Note shall be convertible
              into common stock of Maker anytime, and from time to time, at the
              option of the Note holder, at the rate of one share of common
              stock of Maker for each $2.50 principal hereof; provided however,
              that in the event Maker obtains an effective date from the SEC for
              its proposed IPO. These conversion rights shall terminate 150 days
              after such SEC effective date.

              Upon any conversion hereof, only principal shall be converted and
              any accrued interest shall be paid to Note holder in cash, unless
              upon such conversion date both parties hereto agree in writing to
              also convert such accrued interest amount.

       (3)    All other terms and conditions of the original Note shall remain
              in full force and effect.

<PAGE>



       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Note Amendment was executed by the parties'
       hereto effective ________ , 2004.(1)

                                            VIPER MOTORCYCLE COMPANY



                                            /s/
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Maker


                                            /s/
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Note Holder

----------
(1)    Effective with respect to David W. Palmlund, III on March 18, 2004, with
       respect to Keith Hoffmann on April 30, 2004 and with respect to Ed
       Creel III on April 30, 2004.
*The HONORABLE LEONARD I. GARTH, United States Circuit Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation. _____________ No. 95-1629EM

_____________ WPNT, Inc., * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri. Evergreen Media Corporation of * Washington, D.C., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: December 14, 1995 Filed: January 4, 1996

_____________ Before FAGG, GARTH, * and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Evergreen Media Corporation of Washington, D.C. (Evergreen Media) appeals from an adverse jury verdict in this diversity action. Evergreen Media contends the district court committed error in excluding evidence Evergreen Media asserts was essential to its defense. Evergreen Media also contends the evidence was insufficient to support the jury's award. We believe this case was well tried in the district court. We conclude, however, the issues do not warrant a comprehensive opinion. Having carefully considered the record, briefs, and parties' arguments, we find no reversible error of law and are-2- satisfied the record supports the verdict. We thus affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 27

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to allow each Member

to designate one bill introduced by such Member to be the subject

of a committee vote.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 9, 1997

Mr. CAMPBELL (for himself, Mr. UNDERWOOD, Mr. FILNER, and Ms.

LOFGREN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to

allow each Member to designate one bill introduced by

such Member to be the subject of a committee vote.

1 Resolved, That rule XI of the Rules of the House of

2 Representatives is amended by adding at the end the fol3 lowing new clause:

4 ‘‘7. (a) Each Member shall be entitled to designate

5 one bill introduced by that Member to be heard and voted

6 upon by the committee of jurisdiction during the first ses7 sion of each Congress, if that bill is referred solely to one

8 committee, covers one subject, and is introduced on or be9 fore March 1 of the first session of that Congress. Each
2

•HRES 27 IH

1 such bill that is reported shall be considered by the House

2 during that session. The Member shall so notify the chair3 man of the committee to which such bill is referred.

4 ‘‘(b) The chairman to which any bill described in

5 paragraph (a) is referred shall schedule a committee vote

6 on whether to report the bill. After the vote on such bill,

7 the chairman shall notify the Clerk that a vote has oc8 curred. The Clerk shall keep an up-to-date list of such in9 formation for public inspection.

10 ‘‘(c) If the bill is approved by the Senate in such form

11 that a conference is required before final passage, then

12 the Speaker shall appoint conferees, and if a conference

13 report is filed on such bill, then a vote in the House shall

14 be scheduled before sine die adjournment.

15 ‘‘(d) As used in this clause, the term ‘Member’ means

16 any Member of, Delegate to, or Resident Commissioner

17 in, the Congress.’’.

Æ
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

SHA-POPPIN GOURMET POPCORN LLC, 

an Illinois limited liability company, 

individually and on behalf of all others 

similarly situated,

 Plaintiff,

v.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., an Ohio 

corporation, and 

RCSH OPERATIONS, LLC, Louisiana 

limited liability company, RCSH 

OPERATIONS, INC., a California corporation 

(together d/b/a Ruth’s Chris Steak House), and 

PHUNWARE, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

individually and on behalf of all others 

similarly situated, 

 

Defendants.

Case No. 1:20-cv-02523 

Honorable Joan B. Gottschall 

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Sha-Poppin Gourmet Popcorn LLC hereby 

voluntarily dismisses this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) only

as to Defendants RCSH Operations, LLC and RCSH Operations, Inc. (collectively, “RCSH”), 

without prejudice as to all individual and class claims brought in its Complaint. 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) provides, in relevant part that: “the plaintiff may 

dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing 

party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment . . . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 

41(a)(1)(A)(i). RCSH has neither answered Plaintiff’s complaint nor moved for summary 

Case: 1:20-cv-02523 Document #: 65 Filed: 10/12/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:573
2

judgment. Accordingly, the action against RCSH may be dismissed without prejudice and 

without an order of the Court. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: October 12, 2020 SHA-POPPIN GOURMET POPCORN LLC,

By: /s/ Benjamin H. Richman 

 One of Plaintiff’s Attorneys 

Jay Edelson 

jedelson@edelson.com 

Benjamin H. Richman 

brichman@edelson.com 

Christopher L. Dore 

cdore@edelson.com 

Ari J Scharg 

ascharg@edelson.com 

Daniel J. Schneider 

dschneider@edelson.com 

EDELSON PC

350 North LaSalle Street, 14th Floor 

Chicago, Illinois 60654 

Tel: 312.589.6370 

Fax: 312.589.6378 

Case: 1:20-cv-02523 Document #: 65 Filed: 10/12/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:574
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, Benjamin H. Richman, an attorney, hereby certify that on October 12, 2020, I served 

the above and forgoing Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice Pursuant 

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) by causing a true and accurate copy of the same to be filed and 

served on all counsel of record via the Court’s CM/ECF electronic filing system.

 /s/ Benjamin H. Richman 

Case: 1:20-cv-02523 Document #: 65 Filed: 10/12/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:575
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

JAMES M. GREEN, CECIL M. GREEN, RITA M. 

GREEN,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

MONROVIA NURSERY COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________

2020-1742

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Central District of California in No. 2:18-cv-05257-RGKGJS, Judge R. Gary Klausner.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

LANCE REICH, Holley Driggs, Las Vegas, NV, argued for 

plaintiffs-appellants. 

 DAVID A. DILLARD, Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie 

LLP, Glendale, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also 

represented by STEVEN ANDREW WILSON. 

 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

Case: 20-1742 Document: 50 Page: 1 Filed: 01/06/2021
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, TARANTO and 

CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

January 6, 2021 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 20-1742 Document: 50 Page: 2 Filed: 01/06/2021
#### James M. Greenwade *v.*Commonwealth.

Rewards — Arrest by Sheriff — Want of Good Faith.

The appellant at the time was the sheriff of Menifee county and had a bench warrant in his hands for the arrest of the accused, and before the court could certify his right to the reward as required by the statute in such cases, it was proper that the facts should present a case divested of everything like a want of good faith between the sheriff and the state.

APPEAL FROM MENIFEE CIRCUIT COURT.

November 7, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor :

The proof in this case on the part of the appellant shows that the accused, John Gibbs, was induced to surrender himself under the advice and at the instance of his father. He had been evading the officers of the law for some time and his father being cognizant of his hiding place procured Frisby and Jones, who were friends of the accused, to visit him and say to him' that he had better surrender. The accused at once came to his father’s house and there, with pistol in hand and in the presence of all his friends, permitted the appellant without offering any resistance whatever to arrest him. This arrest was made after his surrender and at a time when it was convenient for the appellant to be near enough to lay his hands gently upon him, and we are inclined to think with a full knowledge that the surrender was to be made at that particular time. The father and mother and all the friends who escorted him home from this secret spot in the woods are very careful to say that he never surrendered until the appellant made his appearance and we are *648inclined to think from their mode of testifying that there must have been some understanding between them all in relation to this important arrest before it was made.

*Stone, Cooper, for appellant.*

*Attorney-General, for appellee.*

The appellant at the time was the sheriff of Menifee county, and had a bench warrant in his hands for the arrest of the accused, and before the court below could certify his right to the reward as required by the statute in such cases, it was proper that the facts should present a case divested of everything like a want of good faith between the sheriff and the state. .We are not disposed to disturb the judgment of the court below and the same is now affirmed. ^
STATE OF ALASKA

SAMPLE BALLOT

PRIMARY ELECTION - AUGUST 25, 1998

INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTERS: To vote for the candidate of your choice, fill in the oval to the right of the
name of the candidate for whom you want to vote. Place your ballot inside the secrecy sleeve, take your

ballot to the ballot box.

DIST. 01

lf you make a mistake while voting, return the ballot to the election official for a new one. A vote which has
been erased or changed will not be counted.

STATE OF ALASKA
OFFICIAL BALLOT

PRIMARY ELECTION
AUGUST 25, 1998

Compietely fili in the oval opposite the name of each candidate for whom you wish to vote. €

=

=

=

(——}

=f

=

=

=

i—

UNITED STATES UNITED STATES iz

SENATOR REPRESENTATIVE —

(vote for one) (vote for one) =

VONDERSAAR, FRANK Democrat (_) PECHEK, STUART D. "STU" Democrat (_)| mm
GOTTLIEB, JEFFREY Green C ) YOUNG, DON Republican (_)| mm
SONNEMAN, JOSEPH A. "JOE" Democrat C_) DORE, JIM Republican C_)| mm
KOHLHAAS, SCOTT A. Libertarian DUNCAN, JIM Democrat (_)| mm
MURKOWSKI, FRANK H. Republican C_) GRAMES, JOHN J.G. "JOHNNY" Green C |
HALE, WILLIAM L. "BILL" Republican (_) =
= =|

GOVERNOR — _ LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR =

(vote for one) _ {vote for one) —

2A =
LINDAUER, JOHN Republican > ULMER, FRAN Democrat (_)| mm
METCALFE, RAY Republican Moderate C_) HARRISON, DAVID Alaskan Independence © _)| mm
WRIGHT, DON Democrat C_) HOLMES, DOYLE E. Republican (_)) mm
GIGLER, ROBERT ALAN Alaskan Independence (_) SMITH, DON Republican (_)} mm
ANDERSON, NELS, JR. Democrat (_) WARD, JERRY Republican (_)| mm
HALDANE, HAROLD A. "SANDY" Alaskan Independence (_) WINN, DAN Green C |=
TAYLOR, ROBIN L. Republican (_) BAXLEY, CLYDE P. Republican Moderate (_)} mm
ROSS, WAYNE A. Republican (_) COLLINS, VIRGINIA Republican (_)) mm
KNOWLES, TONY Democrat (_) al
SULLIVAN, SYLVIA C. Alaskan Independence (_) al
SYKES, JIM Green C_) —
Ls

an

: I

WILLIAMS, WILLIAM K. "BILL" =

=

= =—af a

FRONT Card 1 SEQ# 1
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, John T. McLaughlin, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of US Dataworks, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report basedon such evaluation;c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 14, 2006         /s/ John T. McLaughlin   John T. McLaughlin   Chief Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. §** **1350)**


I,
        John
        T. McLaughlin, of US Dataworks, Inc. certify pursuant to section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
  (i)  the
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the
“Report”), which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements
        of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
  (ii)  the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of US Dataworks,
        Inc.
  Dated:
        August 14, 2008
  /s/
                  John T. McLaughlinJohn
                  T. McLaughlinChief
                  Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 7, 2011 

0131 

Order 

 

February 7, 2011 

141954 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141954 

 COA: 291418 

Emmet CC: 07-009780-CF 

COLOR MINI CAMERA, SWANN D 14 

TWIN PACK CAMERA, 5.1 PHILLIPS BRAND 

SURROUND SOUND SPEAKERS, CURTIS 

MATHES COLOR FLAT SCREEN TELEVISION, 

SONY BRAND BIG SCREEN TELEVISION SN 

9714363, DELL BRAND COMPUTER TOWER, 

KEY BOARD, LCD MONITOR & MOUSE, 

KODAK EASY SHARE 2612 DIGITAL 

CAMERA WITH DOCKING STATION, SONY 

BRAND STEREO RECEIVER SN 8854606, 

VIDEO ROUTER WITH FOUR CHANNELS, 

DELPHI XM RADIO RECEIVER, 2000 GMC 

PICKUP BLACK WITH CAB VIN 

1GTGK24U7YE146315, YARD MACHINE 

SNOW BLOWER #1K045B70430, LAWN BOY 

PUSH MOWER # 250012863, RYOBI LAWN 

TRIMMER #A40743824, POULON BRAND 

CHAIN SAW SN 00333D300, COMMERCIAL 

SERIES CHAR-BROIL GRILL GAS SN 

80004330, RYOBI TABLE SAW SN X052795649, 

RYOBI CHOP SAW SN V0449 and $878, 

Defendants, 

and 

TINA SOCOLOVITCH and ANDREW M. 

KOSACK, 

 Claimants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 14, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

BRUCE PICKENS, Individually and On 

Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, 

Defendant.

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 1:20-cv-3470 

DEFENDANT MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS OR, ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION TO STRIKE 

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 

Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (“MBUSA”), pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure 8, 9(b), 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), moves to dismiss Plaintiff Bruce Pickens’ Second 

Amended Complaint or, in the alternative, to strike the class allegations. MBUSA files its 

Memorandum in Support contemporaneously with this motion, incorporated herein by reference. 

WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth in its Memorandum in Support, MBUSA 

respectfully requests that this Court dismiss plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint and grant such 

other and further relief as this Court deems proper. 

Respectfully submitted, 

By: Renato Mariotti

Renato Mariotti 

Holly H. Campbell 

THOMPSON COBURN LLP 

55 East Monroe, 37th Floor 

Chicago, Illinois 60603 

312.346.7500 

rmariotti@thompsoncoburn.com 

hcampbell@thompsoncoburn.com 

Case: 1:20-cv-03470 Document #: 49 Filed: 03/08/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:610
- 2 - 

Daniel C. Cox 

Christopher M. Hohn 

THOMPSON COBURN LLP 

One US Bank Plaza 

St. Louis, MO 

314.552.6000 

dcox@thompsoncoburn.com 

chohn@thompsoncoburn.com 

Attorneys for Defendant MercedesBenz USA, LLC 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on March 8, 2020, the foregoing was filed electronically with the Clerk 

of Court to be served by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system upon all counsel of 

record. 

 /s/ Renato Mariotti 

Case: 1:20-cv-03470 Document #: 49 Filed: 03/08/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:611