alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

HHS gives notice of a determination concerning a petition to add a class of employees from the Simonds Saw and Steel Company in Lockport, New York, to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (EEOICPA).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director, Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 1090 Tusculum Avenue, MS C-47, Cincinnati, OH 45226-1938, Telephone 1-877-222-7570. Information requests can also be submitted by email to                         *DCAS@CDC.GOV.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority:[42 U.S.C.7384q].

On October 9, 2014, the Secretary of HHS determined that the following class of employees does not meet the statutory criteria for addition to the SEC as authorized under EEOICPA:

All Atomic Weapons Employer employees who worked at Simonds Saw and Steel Co. in Lockport, New York, from January 1, 1958, through December 31, 2006.

John Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 2014-26425 Filed 11-5-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
#### Spencer *v.*Johns.

Opinion delivered November 18, 1929.

*E. D. Chastain,*for appellants.

*Dave Partain*and *C. M. Wofford,*for appellees.

McHaney, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the chancery court requiring each party to pay his own costs in this litigation.

It appears that appellants were about to close a public road, and, on petition of appellees, they were temporarily enjoined from so doing. An agreement was entered into by appellants granting a thirty foot right-of-way across their lands, and appellees agreed to dismiss that suit, each party to pay half the costs. Before a dismissal was actually entered, appellants built a fence up the center oif the road. Thereupon appellees filed an information for contempt. A temporary restraining order *442was issued. There was a hearing before' the chancellor, and it developed that, between the time of the filing of the information and the hearing, appellants had widened the road, and were not in contempt of court. On motion to tax the costs, the court entered an order requiring each party to pay his own costs.

As appellants admit, courts of equity have a wide discretion in the matter of taxing costs against litigants, and this court will not reverse unless it be shown that the court has abused its discretion or acted arbitrarily. We are unable to say from the record presented that there has been a sufficient showing made to justify us in setting aside the action df the court in taxing the costs to each of the parties which they had incurred.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.18

                                                              Date: May 10, 2004



To: KongZhong Corporation

We, KongZhong Information Technologies (Beijing) Co., Ltd. ("KongZhong
Beijing"), hereby irrevocably agree and confirm that prior consultation with
KongZhong Corporation ("KongZhong") shall take place and prior written approval
of the board of directors of KongZhong shall be obtained with respect to
individuals to be designated by KongZhong Beijing for appointment by the
shareholders of Beijing AirInbox Information Technologies Co., Ltd ("Beijing
AirInBox") and/or Beijing Boya Wuji Technologies Co., Ltd ("Beijing Boya Wuji")
as their respective proxies for the exercise of their rights and powers as
shareholders so long as we have the power to designate any individuals for such
appointment under the business operation agreements, as amended from time to
time, entered into between KongZhong Beijing as one party, and Beijing AirInbox
and its shareholders, or Beijing Boya Wuji and its shareholders, as other
parties.



KongZhong Information Technologies (Beijing) Co., Ltd.


      /s/ Yunfan Zhou

Name:  Yunfan Zhou
Title: Legal Representative
#### Jesse Sears *v.*J. M. Bryant, etc.

Patents — Fraudulent Procurement — Collateral Attack.

Even fraud, which, vitiates the most solemn proceedings, such as judgments or patents, cannot be relied upon or proved to impeach either collaterally, but same can only be vitiated or annulled by a direct proceeding, affording as high a grade of evidence as that of their creation.

APPEAL FROM PULASKI CIRCUIT COURT.

June 25, 1872.

*VanWinkle, for appellant.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters:

It has been repeatedly decided by this court that if a patent appear perfect on its face, it cannot be vitiated or annulled by matters dehors the record, except by scire facias, or some other regular mode of proceeding instituted for the purpose of vitiating it.

And even fraud, which vitiates the most solemn proceedings, such as judgments or patents, cannot be relied upon or proved to impeach either collaterally, but the same can only be vitiated or annulled by *a*direct proceeding affording as high a grade of evidence as that of their creation.

The judgment must therefore be affirmed.
IV

House Calendar No. 152

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 382

[Report No. 105–430]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 992) to end the Tucker Act

shuffle.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 10, 1998

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered

to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 992) to end

the Tucker Act shuffle.

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of

3 rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 992) to end the Tucker Act shuffle.

6 The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. Gen7 eral debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not ex-
2

HRES 382 RH

1 ceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair2 man and ranking minority member of the Committee on

3 the Judiciary. After general debate the bill shall be consid4 ered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall

5 be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose

6 of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment

7 in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Commit8 tee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill. The committee

9 amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be consid10 ered as read. During consideration of the bill for amend11 ment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may

12 accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the

13 Member offering an amendment has caused it to be print14 ed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated

15 for that purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII. Amendments

16 so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman of

17 the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a

18 time during further consideration in the Committee of the

19 Whole a request for a recorded vote on any amendment;

20 and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time for elec21 tronic voting on any postponed question that follows an22 other electronic vote without intervening business, pro23 vided that the minimum time for electronic voting on the

24 first in any series of questions shall be fifteen minutes.

25 At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amend-
3

HRES 382 RH

1 ment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the

2 House with such amendments as may have been adopted.

3 Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House

4 on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole

5 to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature

6 of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered

7 as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final

8 passage without intervening motion except one motion to

9 recommit with or without instructions.
House Calendar No. 152

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 382

[Report No. 105–430]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 992)

to end the Tucker Act shuffle.

MARCH 10, 1998

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 165 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                  House Calendar No. 49
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 165

                          [Report No. 105-128]

    Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 11, 1997

     Mr. Goss, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
    Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI for a two-
thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported before June 14, 1997, providing for consideration 
of a bill introduced by the chairman of the Committee on Appropriations 
that includes provisions making supplemental appropriations for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 1997.
                                     





                                                  House Calendar No. 49

105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 165

                          [Report No. 105-128]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

    Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 11, 1997

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 308

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that candidates for

election for Federal office, the individuals working on their campaigns,

and persons involved with the financing of campaigns for election for

Federal office should obey all of the applicable laws, rules, and regulations governing fundraising for such campaigns.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 5, 1997

Mr. HAYWORTH submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Oversight

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

candidates for election for Federal office, the individuals

working on their campaigns, and persons involved with

the financing of campaigns for election for Federal office

should obey all of the applicable laws, rules, and regulations governing fundraising for such campaigns.

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that all candidates for election for Federal of3 fice, the individuals working on their campaigns, and all

4 persons involved with the financing of campaigns for elec5 tion for Federal office should obey all of the applicable
2

•HRES 308 IH

1 laws, rules, and regulations governing fundraising for such

2 campaigns.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 352 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     February 11, 1998.
    Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on Wednesday, February 11, 
1998, or on Thursday, February 12, 1998, for the Speaker to entertain motions 
that the House suspend the rules. The Speaker or his designee shall consult with 
the minority leader or his designee on the designation of any matter for 
consideration pursuant to this resolution.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                        0
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                           401,261
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                             123,251
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        524,512
<PP&E>                                  189,306
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          825,749
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 1,247,219
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  2,345
<OTHER-SE>                             (506,791)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            825,749
<SALES>                               1,021,544
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      1,021,544
<CGS>                                   475,295
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           475,295
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        619,331
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     (144,451)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (217,533)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                           (217,533)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.19)


</TABLE>
H. Res. 472

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

June 17, 1998.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R.

3097) to terminate the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The

bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the report of

the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall

be considered as adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage

without intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate on

the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by the

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or

without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
NWIRP Strategic Plan (draft)

Recommendations for Strengthening 

Thomas L. Smith, AIA, RRC, F.SEI

TLSmith Consulting Inc.

Rockton, IL
• Tools for in situ wind vulnerability assessment 

of new and existing buildings

• Construction workforce development
In Situ Wind Vulnerability Assessment 

• New buildings: Does installed system have 

specified resistance (wind & wind-driven rain)

• Existing buildings: Do existing systems have 

adequate resistance 
Current Assessment Tools 

Excessive 

moisture 

detection 
Current Assessment Tools 

Uplift testing
Current Assessment Tools 

Water testing with 

interior pressure 

chamber & EIFS pull 

test
Assessment Tool Needs 

Attachment of edge flashings, copings, 

gutters & nailers 
Assessment Tool Needs 

Field uplift test 

apparatus for 

other types of 

systems
Construction Workforce Development 

• SP-7 (page 43) does not include construction 

trades. 

-- Workmanship deficiencies are the primary 

cause of many wind failures. This issue 

should be included in SP-7

-- Construction robotics should also be 

addressed in SP-7 or elsewhere
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

CHARLES W. WALSH, III, LAURA BLAU 

AND PHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY 

DEVELOPMENT COALITION

v.

TERESA F. ISABELLA AND 325 S. 18TH 

STREET, LLC

PETITION OF: 325 S. 18TH STREET, LLC

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 197 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of December, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

IN

- DEPTH GEOPHYSICAL, INC., IN

- DEPTH COMPRESSIVE SEISMIC, INC., Appellants

v.

CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, Cross

- Appellant

______________________

2021

- 1013, 2021

- 1063

______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019

- 00850.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

W ILLIAM P OWELL J ENSEN
, Crain Caton & James, Houston, TX, argued for appellants. Also represented by J AMES E LMORE H UDSON
, III

.

W ILLIAM R. P ETERSON
, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Houston, TX, argued for cross

- appellant. Al so represented by A RCHIS V ASANT O ZARKAR ; D ION M ICHAEL B REGMAN
, T HOMAS Y. N OLAN
, A LEXANDER S TEIN , Palo Alto, CA.

______________________ Case: 21-1013 Document: 37 Page: 1 Filed: 10/08/2021T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L OURIE
, O’M ALLEY
, and C HEN
, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

October 8, 2021 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court Case: 21-1013 Document: 37 Page: 2 Filed: 10/08/2021
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

CHICAGO & VICINITY LABORERS’ )

DISTRICT COUNCIL PENSION FUND, )

CHICAGO & VICINITY LABORERS’ )

DISTRICT COUNCIL WELFARE FUND, )

CHICAGO & VICINITY LABORERS’ )

DISTRICT COUNCIL RETIREE HEALTH )

AND WELFARE FUND, and CATHERINE )

WENSKUS, not individually but as ) Case No. 20 C 3474

Administrator of the Funds, )

) Judge Kendall

Plaintiffs, )

v. )

)

MILLENNIUM CONTRACTING CO., an )

Illinois Corporation, )

)

Defendant. ) 

AGREED STIPULATION TO DISMISS

NOW COME Plaintiffs Laborers’ Pension Fund and Laborers’ Welfare Fund of 

the Health and Welfare Department of the Construction and General Laborers’ District 

Council of Chicago and Vicinity, and Laborers’ District Council Retiree Health and 

Welfare Fund, and Catherine Wenskus, Administrator of the Funds (hereinafter 

collectively “Funds”), by and through their attorney, Amy Carollo, and Defendant

Millennium Contracting Co., by and through its attorney, Richard Velázquez of Daley & 

Georges, Ltd., and hereby submit the Parties’ Agreed Stipulation to Dismiss. 

Case: 1:20-cv-03474 Document #: 11 Filed: 08/28/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:58
2

In support of this Stipulation, the Parties state as follows: the Parties have reached 

settlement pursuant to the terms of a Settlement Agreement. The Parties respectfully 

request that this matter be dismissed with prejudice. 

Respectfully submitted,

August 28, 2020 Laborers’ Pension Fund, et al.

By: /s/ Amy Carollo

Office of Fund Counsel

111 West Jackson Boulevard

Suite 1415

Chicago, IL 60604

(312) 692-0354

August 28, 2020 Daley & Georges, Ltd.

By: /s/ Richard Velázquez

Daley & Georges, Ltd.

20 S. Clark St.

Suite 400

Chicago, IL 60603

312-726-8797

Case: 1:20-cv-03474 Document #: 11 Filed: 08/28/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:59
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that she caused copies of the foregoing Agreed 

Stipulation to Dismiss to be served upon the following person via the Court’s electronic 

notification system this 28th day of August, 2020.

Richard Velázquez

Daley & Georges, Ltd.

20 S. Clark St.

Suite 400

Chicago, IL 60603

By: /s/ Amy Carollo

Case: 1:20-cv-03474 Document #: 11 Filed: 08/28/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:60
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6538
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOSEPH RICKY DODD, a/k/a Big Stuff, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CR-96-153, CA-00-896-2) Submitted: June 12, 2003 Decided: June 23, 2003 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Ricky Dodd, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Joseph Ricky Dodd appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeUnited States v. Dodd , Nos. CR-96-153; CA-00-896-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED