alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Thos H. Crutcher v. Thos. Keith, etc.

Vendor and Purchaser — Exchange—Vendor’s Lien — Bond for Conveyance.

The judgment complained of recites the fact that Webber, to whom the purchaser’s money for the house and lot was due, had been paid by Keith, the appellee. It is but equitable that he should have the benefit of his security.

February 16, 1872.

APPEAL FROM DAVIESS CIRCUIT COURT.

March 1, 1872.

APPEAL FROM McCRACKEN COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.

APPEAL FROM CREEN CIRCUIT COURT.

March 2, 1872.

*47
      *I. W. Kincheloe, T. E. Crutcher, for appellant.*

*Sweeney & Stuart, for appellees.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters:

B. H. Crutcher, one of the parties to whom the appellee Darr executed the bond for the conveyance of the house and lot in Owensboro, in his answer professes his willingness to execute the contract for the exchange, and that the money may be paid to relieve the house and lot from the incumbrance of the vendor’s lien, so as to secure-a good title.

The judgment complained of recites the fact that Webber, to whom the purchase money for the house and lot was due, had been paid by Keith, the appellee, and it is 'but equitable that he should have the benefit of his security, especially as no injury can result to appellants.

Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.1

Eastern Division

Cincinnati Specialty Underwriter Insurance

Company

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.:

1:20−cv−03176

Honorable Edmond

E. Chang

Ajax Construction Inc, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, May 22, 2023:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On 05/19/2023, the

lawyers for the parties jointly emailed the courtroom deputy to report that they have

arrived at a settlement in principle and anticipate filing a stipulated dismissal in 30 days or

so. Given that representation, the briefing schedule on the position papers is suspended.

The Plaintiff's extension motion [69] is terminated as moot. The tracking status hearing of

06/09/2023 is reset to 06/26/2023 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is

required, the case will not be called). Instead, the parties shall file a status report by

06/19/2023 if the stipulated dismissal has not been filed by that date. Emailed notice (mw,

)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03176 Document #: 70 Filed: 05/22/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1174
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 210

To express the sense of the House of Representatives on consideration of

comprehensive campaign finance reform.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 31, 1997

Ms. KAPTUR submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on House Oversight

RESOLUTION

To express the sense of the House of Representatives on

consideration of comprehensive campaign finance reform.

Whereas spending on Federal election campaigns has increased to an estimated $2,650,000,000 in the most recent election cycle, a threefold increase over campaign

spending just twenty years ago, even after adjusting for

inflation;

Whereas, in the 1995–1996 election cycle, the Democratic

Party committees raised $332,000,000, a 73-percent increase over the $192,000,000 raised four years earlier,

and the Republican Party committees raised

$549,000,000, a 74-percent increase over the

$316,000,000 they raised four years earlier;
2

•HRES 210 IH

Whereas overall campaign spending for congressional races

has risen from $99,000,000 in 1976 to $626,000,000 in

1996, a more than sixfold increase;

Whereas, since 1992, when political parties were first required to report soft money contributions to the Federal

Election Commission, these contributions, which are

raised outside Federal election law, have tripled, from

$86,000,000 in 1992 to over $263,000,000 in the last

election cycle;

Whereas there has been a proliferation of negative ‘‘issue’’

ads paid for by political parties and interest groups to influence Federal elections, further increasing the cost of

campaigns;

Whereas as political campaigns have become longer, costlier,

and more negative, voter apathy has increased and voter

participation in Presidential elections has declined from

60 percent in 1948–1968, to 53 percent from 1972 to

1992, to an all-time low of 49 percent in 1996;

Whereas these trends will continue if Congress fails to enact

comprehensive campaign finance reform;

Whereas President Clinton and Speaker of the House, Newt

Gingrich, on June 11, 1995, in Claremont, New Hampshire, expressed their support for the creation of an independent commission to write binding campaign finance

reform legislation, but no commission was ever established; and

Whereas President Clinton, during his State of the Union address on February 4, 1997, implored Congress to act on

campaign finance reform and pass legislation by July 4,

1997, the 221st anniversary of the birth of our democ-
3

•HRES 210 IH

racy, but Congress failed to meet his goal: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the House of Representatives should pro3 ceed to the consideration of comprehensive campaign fi4 nance reform that reduces spending on political campaigns

5 and curtails the influence of special interest money in Fed6 eral elections by no later than September 30, 1997, and

7 adopt as a goal the final enactment of such legislation by

8 no later than October 31, 1997.

Æ
9793.

#### Littlefield *v.*The State.

Harwell, J.

1. The sale of intoxicating liquor in the State of Georgia is a misdemeanor. All who procure, counsel, command, aid, or abet the commission of a misdemeanor are regarded ‘ by the law as principal offenders, and may be indicted as such; and any one charged in an indictment with the sale of intoxicating liquors may be convicted by proof either that he directly and personally sold the liquor himself, or that he procured, counseled, commanded, aided, or abetted the sale of liquor by. another, who was the direct and immediate actor. *Loeb*v. State, 6 *Ga. App.*23 (1), 26, 27 (64 S. E. 338).

2. The fact that on a trial upon an indictment for the sale of intoxicating liquor the jury returned a verdict finding “the defendant Paul Little-field guilty of aiding and assisting in the Sale of intoxicating whisky” did not render the conviction illegal, and afforded no ground for arresting the judgment. A general verdict of “guilty” would have been the technically correct form. Since, however, one who aids' and assists in selling intoxicating liquor may be found guilty as the principal offender under an indictment or accusation charging him with the sale,'the verdict in the instant case is simply a special verdict equivalent to a gen *783eral verdict of guilty, and is valid, and the court did not err in overruling the motion in arrest of judgment. See *Dunbar*v. *State,*21 *Ga. App.*502 ( 94 S. E. 587).

Decided November 1, 1918.

Motion to arrest judgment; from Whitfield superior court— Judge Tarver. April 10, 1918.

*W. E. Mann, W. Gordon Mann, Glenn & House,*for plaintiff in error, cited:

Penal Code (1910), § 1059; *Couch*v. *State,*28 *Ga.*367; *O’Connell*v. *State,*55 *Ga.*191; *Ezzard*v. *State,*11 *Ga. App.*30; *Stephens*v. *State,*56 *Ga.*605; *Davis*v. State, 13 *Ga. App.*142, 143; *Gaston*v. *State,*127 *Ga.*51; *Mills*v. *State,*11 *Ga. App.*383; *Lambert*v. *State,*17 *Ga. App.*348; *Wells*v. *State,*116 *Ga.*87; *Smith*v. *State,*117 *Ga.*16 (2).

*Joseph M. Lang, solicitor-general,*contra, cited:

*Arnold*v. *State,*51 *Ga.*144; *Wilson*v. *State,*62 *Ga.*167; *Davis*v. *State,*supra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworili, J., concur.*
#### H. C. Sowards *v.*Thos. E. Henderson, etc.

Evidence—Statements—When Competent.

The sale of the lumber to Bruipley was made by Sowards and his declarations at the time were competent as to the ownership of the property.

March 12, 1872.

APPEAL FROM BOYD CIRCUIT COURT.

*C. W. Brown, for appellant.*

*Moore, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Pryor :

The sale of the lumber to Brumley and Gallup was made by Morgan Sowards, 'and his declarations or 'statements at the time were competent as to the ownership to the property. The note was executed to the brother at the suggestion of Morgan Sowards and the reason given by him at the time for having it so written. There is no exception to the deposition and no pretense that Morgan was acting as agent for his brother. _ If he was, the fact could have been easily established. We are not disposed to disturb the judgment and the same is therefore affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 49 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 49

 Expressing appreciation for the life and service of Ambassador Pamela 
                              C. Harriman.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 1997

Mr. Gilman (for himself, Mr. Hamilton, and Mr. Manzullo) submitted the 
     following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                        International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing appreciation for the life and service of Ambassador Pamela 
                              C. Harriman.

Whereas Pamela C. Harriman served her country ably as United States Ambassador 
        to France from 1993 to early 1997;
Whereas during her tenure as ambassador Pamela Harriman worked tirelessly to 
        bring closer together as strong allies and friends the United States and 
        France;
Whereas Pamela Harriman worked throughout her adult life in the fields of 
        politics and the arts, enriching the lives of all who knew her and all 
        Americans;
Whereas during the Second World War Pamela Harriman endeavored to solidify 
        relations among Britain, the United States, and France, contributing her 
        knowledge and her efforts to making the alliance against Nazism a 
        success;
Whereas as a wife and friend she gave strength and wise counsel to one of the 
        great United States statesmen of this century, Governor Averell 
        Harriman; and
Whereas until the very end of her life she was renowned as a woman of grace, 
        wit, and charm: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Members of the House of Representatives--
            (1) are grateful for the life and service of this great 
        American; and
            (2) join in conveying their condolences and deepest 
        sympathies to the members of the family of Ambassador Pamela C. 
        Harriman.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.25

 

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary L. Paxton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

/s/ Gary L. Paxton

Gary L. Paxton

Chief Executive Officer

May 5, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. and will be retained by Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Schmitt Industries, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, WayneA. Case and Michael S. McAfee, Chief Executive Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to ourknowledge:

          (1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

WayneA. CaseChief Executive OfficerJuly 31, 2007

MichaelS. McAfeeChief Financial OfficerJuly 31, 2007

 

----
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed

March 5 , 2015.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00979

- CV

IN RE ALBERT ORTIZ , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 164th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Cou rt Cause No. 2006

- 61178



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
On December 11, 2014, relator Albert Ortiz filed a petition for writ of

m andamus in this c ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 ( West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this c ou rt to compel the Honorable
Alexandra Smoots

- Hogan, presiding judge of the 164th District Court of Harris County , to set aside her November 12, 2014 summary judgment order, which precludes relator from bring ing additional claims on remand

.2

Relator has not e stablished that he is entitled mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus. We also deny relator’s motion for emergency relief.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and McCally.
CFTC Ex. 126 

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 80-4 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:1607
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 80-4 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:1608
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 80-4 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:1609
Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 80-4 Filed: 11/05/21 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:1610
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Everett McKinley Dirksen UnitedStates Courthouse

 Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn Street

 Chicago, Illinois 60604

Office of the Clerk

Phone: (312) 435-5850

www.ca7.uscourts.gov

NOTICE OF DOCKETING - Short Form

November 4, 2020

To: Thomas G. Bruton

Clerk of Court

The below captioned appeal has been docketed in the United States Court of Appeals for the

Seventh Circuit:

Appellate Case No: 20-3157

Caption:

PODIATRY IN MOTION, INC., on behalf of Plaintiff and the class

members defined herein, 

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

INTERVIEWING SERVICE OF AMERICAN, LLC and JOHN DOES, 

Defendants - Appellees

District Court No: 1:20-cv-03159

District Judge Ronald A. Guzman

Clerk/Agency Rep Thomas G. Bruton

Date NOA filed in District Court: 11/03/2020

If you have any questions regarding this appeal, please call this office.

form name: c7_Docket_Notice_short_form(form ID: 188)

Case: 20-3157 Document: 1-3 Filed: 11/04/2020 Pages: 1

Case: 1:20-cv-03159 Document #: 34 Filed: 11/04/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:176
Exhibit 99.1

OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to Long Beach Mortgage Loan Trust 2004-2 Asset-
Backed Certificates, Series 2004-2 (the "Securitization").  Long Beach Mortgage
Company (the "Master Servicer") master services mortgage loans in connection
with the Securitization (the "Mortgage Loans") pursuant to the terms of that
certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2004 (the
"Servicing Agreement") by and among Long Beach Securities Corp., as depositor,
the Master Servicer, as master servicer, and Deutsche Bank National Trust
Company, as trustee (the "Trustee").  Capitalized terms used herein but not
defined shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Servicing Agreement.

I, James Guerin, an authorized officer of the Master Servicer, certify for the
Benefit of the Depositor, the Trustee, the NIMS Insurer and each Rating Agency
with Respect to the calendar year immediately preceding the date of this
Officer's Certificate (the "Relevant Year"), as follows:

1.  A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the Relevant Year
and of performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my
supervision.

2.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Relevant Year.


DATED as of March 1, 2005.


By:  /s/  James Guerin
Name:     James Guerin
Title:    Senior Vice President
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Katie Konans","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/keatkin1\/","title":"Sun Series: What is Space Weather?","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"CAETOLM7yS\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/curious-universe\/sun-series-space-weather\/\">Sun Series: What is Space Weather?<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/curious-universe\/sun-series-space-weather\/embed\/#?secret=CAETOLM7yS\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Sun Series: What is Space Weather?” — NASA\" data-secret=\"CAETOLM7yS\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/helio-series-cu-episode-spaceweather-v01.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
N O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO NIN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R



### NO. CAAP-21-0000574

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
O F THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
STEPHEN I. ADLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DISCOVERY HARBOUR COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT

( CIVIL NO. 3CCV-20-0000367)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Hiraoka and McCullen, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that we lack appellate jurisdiction over self-represented Plaintiff-Appellant Stephen I. Adler's ( Adler ) appeal from the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit's ( circuit court ) October 11, 2021 Order Granting Defendant[-Appellee] Discovery Harbour Community Association's Motion to Strike [Adler]'s Court Filings Dkt. Nos. 13, 15, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 31, 33, 35, 39, and 41, Filed June 23, 2021 ( Order ) because the circuit court has not entered a final, appealable judgment, and the Order is not independently appealable. See Hawaii Revised Statutes § 641-1 (2016); Hawai # i Rules of Civil Procedure Rules 58 & 54(b); Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, 76 Hawai # i 115, 119, 869 P.2d 1334, 1338 (1994); Ciesla v. Reddish, 78 Hawai # i 18, 20, 889 P.2d 702, 704 (1995).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-21-0000574 09-FEB-2022 07:56 AM Dkt. 103 ODSLJN O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO NIN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R 

### IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, February 9, 2022. /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge /s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge

2
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 196 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 23, 1997.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and they are hereby, elected 
to the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Banking and Financial Services: Mr. Redmond.
    Committee on National Security: Mr. Redmond.
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. Pitts.
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Redmond.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```