alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### J. A. Barber *v.*Ben Moore.

Trials — Failure to State Cause of Action — Demurrer May Be Filed at Any Time — Non-suit—Arrest of Judgment — Insufficient Petition Grounds for Reversal.

If a plaintiff fails to state a cause of action, it is not too late, in the progress of the trial, at any time to demur, or to move for non-suit, or in arrest of judgment, and where a plaintiff has recovered judgment below and. has failed to-"state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action the Court of Appeals will reverse the judgment.

Exchange of Property — Deceit—Action to Recover On — Title Must Be in Plaintiff.

Appellant in his amended petition admitted that he was not the owner of the horse he traded but had general permission to trade him. These are only conclusions of the pleader and not a statement of such facts as. would divest the owner of the title to the horse.

APPEAL PROM CALLOWAY CIRCUIT COURT.

November 14, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

If a plaintiff fails to state a cause of action, it is not too late in the progress of the trial at any time to demur, or .to move for non-suit, or in arrest of judgment, and where a plaintiff has recovered judgment -below and has failed to state facts sufficient to -constitute a cause of action, this court will reverse the judgment unless the defect is cured by the answer.

In this case appellant seeks to recover damages for deceit on the part of appellee in a horse trade. The latter in his answer says appellant is not damaged because the horse he swapped *193did not belong to him, but was the property of A. A. Barber. In his amended petition-, appellant- admits the horse he traded belongs to his brother, A. A. Barber, and says when he traded him he simply became indebted to his brother for the price of the horse — having general permission to trade the horse — these are only conclusions of the pleader, and not a statement of such facts as would divest A. A. Barber of the title to the horse— and for all that appears he might bring his action and recover the horse from appellee — facts should have been stated to show that A. A. Barber was divested of his title to the horse.

*W. J. Stubblefield, for appellant.*

*Anderson, for appellee.*

Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Sets Coverage for Launch, Docking of New Space Station Crew","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"hHeZpoq5bh\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-sets-coverage-for-launch-docking-of-new-space-station-crew\/\">NASA Sets Coverage for Launch, Docking of New Space Station Crew<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-sets-coverage-for-launch-docking-of-new-space-station-crew\/embed\/#?secret=hHeZpoq5bh\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Sets Coverage for Launch, Docking of New Space Station Crew” — NASA\" data-secret=\"hHeZpoq5bh\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/30016892407_445818ed60_o.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":385}
Case: 1:20-cv-03375 Document #: 59 Filed: 07/24/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:765
Case: 1:20-cv-03375 Document #: 59 Filed: 07/24/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:766
Case: 1:20-cv-03375 Document #: 59 Filed: 07/24/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:767
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

TOSHIBA J. SANDERS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-3376

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed April 24, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Polk County; J. Kevin Abdoney, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KELLY, MORRIS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2176
THE ESTATE OF KENNETH B. FENNELL, by andthrough Norwood F. Fennell and Annie B. Fennell, Co-administrators; NORWOOD F. FENNELL, ANNIE B. FENNELL, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus R. L. STEPHENSON, in his personal capacity, Defendant - Appellee, and GORDON B. ARNOLD, in his personal capacity; JOHN DOES, State Officials, in their personal capacities, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CA-95-795-2) Submitted: May 29, 1998 Decided: July 21, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.2 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Alan McSurely, MCSURELY, DOROSIN & OSMENT, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Earl Whitted, Jr., Goldsboro, North Carolina, for Appellants. Isaac T. Avery, III, Special Deputy Attorney General, Reuben F. Young, Assistant Attorney General, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM:The parents of Kenneth Fennell, individually and as coadministrators of his estate, appeal from the district court’s order denying relief on their claim of violations of Fennell’s Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (1994), and violations of North Carolina common law, including wrongful death and conspiracy. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Estate of Fennell v. Stephenson , No. CA-95-795-2 (M.D.N.C. July 29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

CHRISTIAN DIOR COUTURE, S.A., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CHINABRANDMALL.COM, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 20-cv-02421 

Judge Robert W. Gettleman 

Magistrate Judge Susan E. Cox

Declaration of Justin R. Gaudio 

I, Justin R. Gaudio, of the City of Chicago, in the State of Illinois, declare as follows: 

1. I am an attorney at law, duly admitted to practice before the Courts of the State of Illinois 

and the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. I am one of the 

attorneys for Plaintiff Christian Dior Couture, S.A. (“Plaintiff” or “Dior”). Except as 

otherwise expressly stated to the contrary, I have personal knowledge of the following facts 

and, if called as a witness, I could and would competently testify as follows: 

2. Since and pursuant to entry of the TRO, several financial accounts associated with the 

Seller Aliases have been frozen. In addition, Dior is in the process of requesting transfer of 

the Domain Names. 

3. Exhibit 1 attached hereto is a true and correct copy of unpublished decisions cited in 

Dior’s Memorandum. 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-02421 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 06/22/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:3044
2 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed on this the 22nd day of June 2020 at Chicago, Illinois. 

 /s/ Justin R. Gaudio 

Justin R. Gaudio 

Counsel for Christian Dior Couture, S.A. 

Case: 1:20-cv-02421 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 06/22/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:3045
**Exhibit      32.1 **

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | (a) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                    |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/    RAY                THOUSAND                  |
|   | **Ray                Thousand**                                         |
|   | **Chief                Executive Officer and                President** |

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Highlights Science on Next Resupply Mission to International Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"r9YQMDv2rm\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-highlights-science-on-next-resupply-mission-to-international-space-station-2\/\">NASA Highlights Science on Next Resupply Mission to International Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-highlights-science-on-next-resupply-mission-to-international-space-station-2\/embed\/#?secret=r9YQMDv2rm\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Highlights Science on Next Resupply Mission to International Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"r9YQMDv2rm\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/2_dss_solar_array.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
IV

House Calendar No. 43

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 162

[Report No. 105–120]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 1469) making emergency supplemental appropriations for recovery from natural disasters, and for overseas peacekeeping efforts,

including those in Bosnia, for the fiscal year ending September 30,

1997, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 5, 1997

Mr. DREIER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 1469) making emergency supplemental appropriations for recovery from natural disasters, and for overseas peacekeeping efforts, including

those in Bosnia, for the fiscal year ending September

30, 1997, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 1469) making emergency supple-
2

HRES 162 RH

1 mental appropriations for recovery from natural disasters,

2 and for overseas peacekeeping efforts, including those in

3 Bosnia, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1997,

4 and for other purposes. All points of order against the con5 ference report and against its consideration are waived.

6 The conference report shall be considered as read.

House Calendar No. 43

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 162

[Report No. 105–120]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference reand for other purposes. for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1997, peacekeeping efforts, including those in Bosnia, ery from natural disasters, and for overseas emergency supplemental appropriations for recov- port to accompany the bill (H.R. 1469) making

JUNE 5, 1997

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 24, 2016

a0516 

# Order

Clerk May 24, 2016

151773

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 151773

COA: 326398

Wayne CC: 89

- 012514

- FC

ANTHONY LEE NELSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 5, 2015 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not per suaded that

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 21.1
 ITEM 1. Subsidiaries of the Company
 Entity
    
    State of IncorporationAcapulco Restaurants, Inc.
    
    DelawareEl Torito Restaurants, Inc.
    
    DelawareEl Torito Franchising Company
    
    DelawareEl Paso Cantina, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaMurray Pacific
    
    CaliforniaTARV, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaALA Design, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaAcapulco Restaurant of Westwood, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaAcapulco Restaurant of Moreno Valley, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaAcapulco Restaurant of Ventura, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaAcapulco Restaurant of Downey, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaAcapulco Mark Corp.
    
    DelawareReal Mex Foods, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaCKR Acquisition Corp.
    
    DelawareChevys Restaurants, LLC
    
    Delaware
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                          12,035
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,707
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (513)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,176
<PP&E>                                           2,993
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,993
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,258
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,184
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,359
<SALES>                                         27,051
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,051
<CGS>                                           21,352
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,049
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (549)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  96
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,647
<INCOME-TAX>                                        72
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                975
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       975
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2004-J4
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-J4


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

     (i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
     preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer
     under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

     (ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master
     Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout
     such year.




/s/ Joseph M. Candelario                      Dated: March 28, 2005
------------------------

JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Mark Wong                                 Dated: March 28, 2005
-------------

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
FILED 2/3/2022

THOMAS G. BRUTON CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

Case: 1:20-cr-00260 Document #: 85 Filed: 02/03/22 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:262
Case: 1:20-cr-00260 Document #: 85 Filed: 02/03/22 Page 2 of 17 PageID #:263
Case: 1:20-cr-00260 Document #: 85 Filed: 02/03/22 Page 3 of 17 PageID #:264
Case: 1:20-cr-00260 Document #: 85 Filed: 02/03/22 Page 4 of 17 PageID #:265
Case: 1:20-cr-00260 Document #: 85 Filed: 02/03/22 Page 5 of 17 PageID #:266
Case: 1:20-cr-00260 Document #: 85 Filed: 02/03/22 Page 6 of 17 PageID #:267
Case: 1:20-cr-00260 Document #: 85 Filed: 02/03/22 Page 7 of 17 PageID #:268
Case: 1:20-cr-00260 Document #: 85 Filed: 02/03/22 Page 8 of 17 PageID #:269
Case: 1:20-cr-00260 Document #: 85 Filed: 02/03/22 Page 9 of 17 PageID #:270
Case: 1:20-cr-00260 Document #: 85 Filed: 02/03/22 Page 10 of 17 PageID #:271
Case: 1:20-cr-00260 Document #: 85 Filed: 02/03/22 Page 11 of 17 PageID #:272
Case: 1:20-cr-00260 Document #: 85 Filed: 02/03/22 Page 12 of 17 PageID #:273
Case: 1:20-cr-00260 Document #: 85 Filed: 02/03/22 Page 13 of 17 PageID #:274
Case: 1:20-cr-00260 Document #: 85 Filed: 02/03/22 Page 14 of 17 PageID #:275
Case: 1:20-cr-00260 Document #: 85 Filed: 02/03/22 Page 15 of 17 PageID #:276
Case: 1:20-cr-00260 Document #: 85 Filed: 02/03/22 Page 16 of 17 PageID #:277
Case: 1:20-cr-00260 Document #: 85 Filed: 02/03/22 Page 17 of 17 PageID #:278
#### UNITED STATES v. HARRIS et al.

No. 13897.

District Court, W. D. Missouri, w. D.

June 12, 1947.

Otto Schmid, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff.

Joseph Miniace and Ira B. McLaughlin, both of Kansas City, Mo., for defendant.

REEVES, District Judge.

The petitioner has filed his motion in forma pauperis for the correction of an alleged error in the sentence heretofore imposed upon him. In his motion the petitioner sets forth the chronology and history of the case. It is unnecessary to repeat such chronology or history.

The petitioner was convicted upon an indictment charging him with violating Section 588b “Robbery of bank;” Title 12 U.S.C.A. The indictment was conventional and in two counts. Upon conviction he was sentenced to 20 years on the first count and to 25 years on the second count, the sentences to run consecutively. After decision in the case of Hewitt v. United States, 8 Cir., 110 F.2d 1, the petitioner sought to have the sentence corrected in his case.

In the Hewitt case it was held by the Court of Appeals that the sentence on the first count, which is precisely like that in the petitioner’s case, was invalid, but that the sentence on the second count was a valid sentence. The Court of Appeals, therefore, reversed the sentence on the. first count and affirmed the sentence on the second count.

The petitioner instituted a mandamus proceeding against the writer for a correction of the sentence. Garrison et al. v. Reeves, District Judge, 8 Cir., 116 F.2d 978. In rendering its decision on the application of the petitioner and his associates, the court said: “On consideration of the petition for mandamus and the showing in support thereof * * * we are of opinion that the sentence of twenty-five years imposed under count two of the indictment against these petitioners was and *787is ill all respects valid, but that the sentence to twenty years imprisonment under count one was not valid in law, * *

It will be noted from the foregoing that the petitioner, in an action brought wholly for that purpose, obtained an adjudication that the sentence of twenty-five years imposed upon him on the second count was a valid sentence. At the same time he obtained a judgment invalidating the sentence on the first count of the indictment. It is his contention now that the only valid sentence was the first count and that the second count was invalid. To sustain the contention of the appellant upon a judgment obtained by him, and which judgment was satisfactory to him at the time, would be for this court to nullify a specific and direct ruling of the Circuit Court of Appeals.

The “motion for correction of sentence” should be and will be overruled.