alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

WESTERN DIVISION

THE BELOVED CHURCH, an Illinois

Not-for-Profit Corporation, and PASTOR

STEPHEN CASSELL, an individual,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

JAY ROBERT PRITZKER, Governor of

the State of Illinois, DAVID SNYDERS,

Sheriff of Stephenson County, Illinois,

STEVE SCHAIBLE, Chief of Police of the

Village of Lena, Illinois, and CRAIG

BEINTEMA, Administrator of the

Department of Public Health of Stephenson

County, Illinois, in their official capacities,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 3:20-cv-50153

District Judge John Z. Lee

Magistrate Judge Iain D. Johnston

PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL

Notice is hereby given that The Beloved Church and Stephen Cassell, plaintiffs in the

above named case, hereby appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

from the District Court’s May 2, 2020 Minute Order (Dkt. 37) and May 3, 2020 Memorandum

Opinion and Order (Dkt. 39) denying their Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and

Preliminary Injunction.

/s/Martin Whittaker

THOMAS MORE SOCIETY

309 W. Washington St, Ste. 1250

Chicago, IL 60606

1

Case: 3:20-cv-50153 Document #: 46 Filed: 05/04/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:333
(312) 782-1680

Peter Breen

Thomas Brejcha

Martin Whittaker

pbreen@thomasmoresociety.org

tbrejcha@thomasmoresociety.org

mwhittaker@thomasmoresociety.org

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

2

Case: 3:20-cv-50153 Document #: 46 Filed: 05/04/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:334
H. Res. 319

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 12, 1997.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (S. 738) to reform the statutes relating to Amtrak, to authorize appropriations for Amtrak, and for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as

read for amendment. The amendment printed in the report

of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall

be considered as adopted. All points of order against the bill,

as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage

without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on

the bill, as amended, which shall be equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the
2

•HRES 319 EH

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure; and (2) one

motion to commit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 994 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 994

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 1997

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the United States border station located in Pharr, Texas, 
       as the ``Kika de la Garza United States Border Station''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States border station located in Pharr, Texas, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Kika de la Garza United States Border 
Station''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the border station referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Kika de la Garza 
United States Border Station''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 23, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Jeff Trandahl,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 23.2

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ENGINEERS

     As  independent  engineering  consultants,  Ryder  Scott Company, LP hereby
consents  to  the  use  of  our report entitled "PetroSearch Energy Corporation,
Estimated  Future  Reserves  and  Income  Attributable  to Certain Leasehold and
Royalty Interests, SEC Parameters, as of December 31, 2005" dated March 29, 2006
and  data  extracted  therefrom  (and all references to our Firm) included in or
made  a  part  of  this  Form  10-KSB  Annual  Report.

                                        /s/ Ryder Scott Company, LP.
                                        RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, LP.

Houston, TX
March 29, 2006
Amendment No. 1 to Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan



 Exhibit 10.54 
  
 Amendment No. 1 
  
 Provide Commerce, Inc. 
 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

  
 WHEREAS, Provide Commerce, Inc. (the “Company”)
adopted the Provide Commerce, Inc., Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “Plan”); 
  
 WHEREAS, the Plan became effective on January 1, 2004; 
  
 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Article 5.2 of the Plan, any employer may, at any time, amend or modify the Plan in whole or in part with respect to its
participating employees by the actions of its Board of Directors; 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan as set forth below; and 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as of January 1, 2004, as follows: 
  

	 	1.	 	Section 1.11(a) and (b) of the Plan are hereby amended in their entirety to read as follows: 

  
 “Section 1.11(a) “Compensation” shall mean annual salary before reduction for compensation deferred
pursuant to the non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan and before reduction for compensation deferred pursuant to all tax-qualified retirement plans, and Code Section 125 or 401(k) plans of any Employer, but excluding bonuses, commissions,
overtime, relocation expenses, incentive payments, non-monetary award, directors fees and other fees, and automobile allowances and other fringe benefits paid to a Participant for employment services rendered to any Employer.” 
  
 “Section 1.11(b) Notwithstanding the foregoing,
“Compensation” for CEO shall mean annual salary and annual bonus before reduction for compensation deferred pursuant to the non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan and before reduction for compensation deferred pursuant to all
tax-qualified retirement plans, and Code Section 125 or 401(k) plans of any Employer, but excluding bonuses, commissions, overtime, relocation expenses, incentive payments, non-monetary award, directors fees and other fees, and automobile allowances
and other fringe benefits paid to a Participant for employment services rendered to any Employer.” 
  

	 	2.	 	Section 1.25(b) is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

  
 “Section 1.25(b) “SERP Benefit for the Chairman” shall mean a defined benefit of Two Hundred Thirty Two Thousand Four Hundred Forty
Eight Dollars ($232,448) payable to the chairman of the Board as of December 1, 2003 (the “Chairman”) annually over twenty (20) years commencing upon his date of Retirement.” 
  

	 	3.	 	Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with the terms and conditions thereof.
Development of RF Preamplifiers and 

RF Coils for High Field MRI

Afonso C. Silva, Stephen J. Dodd, Hellmut Merkle, 

George C. Nascimento, Alan P. Koretsky and 

Joseph Murphy-Boesch

Laboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke

National Institutes of Health

10/06/2009 Slide #1

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

National Institutes of Health
10/06/2009 Slide #2

High Field MRI Technology

MRI is a major technology in biomedical research and clinical 

practice. 

Novel technology: higher magnetic fields

7T-11.7T for animal and human systems

7-17T for animal systems

High magnetic fields 

demand high performance receivers and 

present specific challenges 

unmet by industry, to date

Development of building blocks for MRI signal detection

Low-impedance, low-noise preamplifiers at 7T (300MHz) and

11.7T (500Mhz)

Receive-only RF Coils with Phased-Array technology

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

National Institutes of Health
Current Stage of Product Development

Preamplifiers

Designs developed and tested at 300MHz and 500 MHz

• Modular Design

• Compatible with Multiple Interfaces: SIEMENS, GE, BRUKER, VARIAN, etc.

Typical characteristics:

• Input Impedance < 1 Ohm

• Gain 28-30 dB

• Output Impedance 50 Ohm

RF Coils

Several Designs Available for Animal and Human Applications

Single Coil 

Phased-Arrays

10/06/2009 Slide #3

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

National Institutes of Health
Advantages and Opportunities

Unique Advantages

Modular design supports different architectures/vendors

Optimized electronic characteristics 

Improved image quality and sensitivity

Market Opportunities

Applications in both animal and human MRI

Opportunities in both clinical and research fields

Devices not currently commercially available

• Low impedance, low-noise amplifiers are not commercially available at 

frequencies ≥ 300 MHz

09/06/2009 Slide #4

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

National Institutes of Health
Collaboration and Licensing Opportunities

Collaboration:

Improvement of the circuitry and layout of the preamplifiers

Access to scientific expertise and NIH resources

• Tested and proven prototype 

• NINDS can assist with commercial development

Licensing:

RF coils: design patents available

Preamplifiers: NIH design available

Advantage - Minimal development to market needed 

10/06/2009 Slide #5

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

National Institutes of Health
Contact Information

For further information contact:

Licensing:

Michael Shmilovich Esq.

NIH Office of Technology Transfer

shmilovm@mail.nih.gov

301-435-5019

Collaboration:

Melissa Maderia, Ph.D.

NCI Technology Transfer Center, CSC for NINDS

maderiam@mail.nih.gov

301-451-3943

- or -

Joseph Murphy-Boesch, Ph.D. 

Laboratory of Functional and Molecular Imaging 

murphyboeschj@ninds.nih.gov

301-594-1305

10/06/2009 Slide #6

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

National Institutes of Health
No. 87-6296.

#### Wicker *v.*Texas.

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 717 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 717

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to continue the exemption of 
   certain institutions of higher education serving minorities from 
         default-based ineligibility for student loan programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 1997

  Mr. Flake introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to continue the exemption of 
   certain institutions of higher education serving minorities from 
         default-based ineligibility for student loan programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds that--
            (1) historically Black colleges and universities endeavor 
        to educate a disproportionate number of students in need of 
        financial assistance;
            (2) historically Black colleges and universities rely on 
        the Federal student loan program to execute their vital mission 
        of educating a historically underserved population;
            (3) historically Black colleges and universities have 
        played an essential role in the development of the history and 
        culture of the United States, educating great leaders, 
        teachers, artists, and scientists; and
            (4) the appropriate Federal response to high loan default 
        rates of historically Black colleges and universities is not to 
        eliminate these schools from the programs, but to work with 
        historically Black colleges and universities to take remedial 
        action.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EXEMPTION.

    Section 435(a)(2)(C) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1085(a)(2)(C)) is amended by striking ``July 1, 1998'' and inserting 
``October 1, 2004''.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
RAYMOND SIERRA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3033 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed December 7, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; James A. Yancey, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Julius J. Aulisio, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Order filed, April 6, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00206-CV

____________

KEVIN PREDERGAST AND JAMES INBODEN, Appellant

V.

DANIEL J. HOFFMAN AND DANIEL J. HOFFMAN, LLC D/B/A DANIEL J. 

HOFFMAN & ASSOCIATES, FKA DANIEL J. HOFFMAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-07609

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due March 8, 2012, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 

35.1. On March 14, 2012, this court ordered the court reporter to file the record within 15 days. 

The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed 

timely, we issue the following order.

We order the official court reporter of the 80th District Court, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. No further extension will be entertained absent 

exceptional circumstances. The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that 

the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If does not timely file the 
record as ordered, we will issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to 

determine the reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
#### Thos. B. Mattingly *v.*Louisville *&*Nashville Railroad Co.

New Trial — Presiding Judge Dies Pending Motion — New Trial Granted by Successor.

The judge who presided over the trial having died without disposing of the motion for a new trial, his successor granted it without any knowledge of the evidence adduced on the trial, or of the rulings or instructions of the court and a verdict and judgment was rendered for the defendant on the second trial.

Held, that reasonable and fair presumption should be indulged in, in favor of the correctness of both the finding of the jury, and the action of the court in supervising the trial; and the general rule seems to be that a new trial ought not to be granted without such knowledge or information as will enable the court to exercise a sound judicial discretion in determining the question involved; which information can be brought, to the mind of the judge by competent evidence.

APPEAL FROM MARION CIRCUIT COURT.

January 23, 1872.

*133*W. B. Harrison, for appellant.*

*Noble, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Hardin:

This action was twice tried in t'he circuit court. The first' trial resulting in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for the sum of $125 — and the judge who presided over the trial having died, without disposing of a -motion, which was made by the defendant for a new trial, his successor granted a new -trial, as appears in the record, without considering or ever having any knowledge of the evidence adduced on. the trial, or of the rulings or instructions of the -court; and a verdict and judgment having been rendered for the defendant on the second trial, the plaintiff has appealed to this court; and -hi-s counsel relies mainly for a reversal on the ground that the court erred in setting aside the fir-st judgment without any knowledge of the grounds upon which the motion for a new trial was based.

In the absence of any evidence conducing -to a contrary conclusion every reasonable and fair presumption should be indulged in favor of the correctness of both the finding of the jury and the action of the court in -supervising the trial and the general rule seems to -be that a new trial ought not to be granted without such knowledge o-r information and consideration by the court of the ground of complaint against the judgment, as will enable the court -to exercise a sound judicial discretion in- determining the questions involved; which knowledge or information -could have been brought to the mind of the judge in this case by an enquiry as to what occurred o-n the trial, and such an enquiry should, if asked, have been allowed -to the party seeking to vacate the judgment *(Graham & Waterman on New Trials, pages*596 to 599).

For the error indicated the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to allow the defendant, if it shall ask to be permitted to do so, -to establish by any competent evidence the facts which transpired on the former trial in passing on -the motion for a new trial.
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of SKRP 1, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:


     (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
           or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of
           operations of the Company.


/s/ Richard Rappaport
---------------------------------------
Richard Rappaport
President (Principal Executive Officer)



/s/ Glenn Krinsky
---------------------------------------
Glenn Krinsky
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Dated: March 30, 2005

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to SKRP 1, Inc. and will be retained by SRKP 1, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 21.1

| Registered Name(business is conducted under the registered names)                                     | Domicile              | Owner     | % held | Status |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|-----------|--------|--------|
| Sancon Recycling Pty Ltd.                                                                             | Australia             | Sancon    | 100    | Active |
| Sancon Resources Recovery (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. ("Sancon SH" hereinafter)                              | Shanghai              | Sancon    | 70     | Active |
| Crossover Solutions Inc. ("CS" hereinafter)                                                           | British Virgin Island | Sancon    | 100    | Active |
| Sheng Rong Environment Protection Technology Co.,Ltd. (“Shanghai Sheng Rong” hereinafter) | Shanghai              | Sancon SH | 52     | Active |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001049103
<NAME> EASTPORT RED'S INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,890
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,890
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,890
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              956
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,066)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,890
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,902
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (2,902)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (38)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,940)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,940)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,940)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

**CERTIFICATION**

          Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Jay M. Short, Ph.D., the Chief Executive Officer of DiversaCorporation (the “Company”), and Karin Eastham, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

**1.          **The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the“Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

**2.          **The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the periodcovered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.

Dated:   November 12, 2002

| /s/  JAY M. SHORT |  
 
/s/  KARIN EASTHAM

 
 
**Jay M. Short, Ph.D. Chief Executive Officer**

 
 
**Karin Eastham Chief Financial Officer**

  |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|