alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Wntteb ~tate~ ([ourt of ~peaI~

for tbe jfeberaI ([trcutt

LARRYE. BELTON, SR.,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS

AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee.

2012-7150

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for

Veterans Claims in case no. 12-1077, Judge Mary J.

Schoelen.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Larry E. Belton, Sr. moves for a 30-day extension of

time file his initial brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

Case: 12-7150 Document: 9 Page: 1 Filed: 09/24/2012
LARRY BELTON, SR. V. SHINSEKI

The motion is granted.

SEP 24 2012

Date

cc: Larry E. Belton, Sr.

Cameron Cohick, Esq.

s27

2

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

f

iLED u.s. COUR OF APPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAl. CIRCUIT

SEP 24 ZU1L

JAN HORBAlY

CLERK

Case: 12-7150 Document: 9 Page: 2 Filed: 09/24/2012
| (1)   | the                Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Technology Holdings, Inc. for the                fiscal                year ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of                Section                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)   | the                information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the                fiscal                year ended June 30, 2006, fairly presents in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of Technology Holdings,                Inc.. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: | /s/                  Sam Medley                                                                 |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Sam                  Medley                                                               |
|  Title:    |  Principal                  Executive Officer Principal                  Financial Officer |
|  Date:     |  October                  4, 2006                                                          |
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE FORM

In the Matter of Case Number:

UNITED STATES v. WILMER ALEXANDER GARCIA MEZA 20 CR 035

AN APPEARANCE IS HEREBY FILED BY THE UNDERSIGNED AS ATTORNEY FOR:

(In the space below, enter the name of the party or parties being represented)

WILMER ALEXANDER GARCIA MEZA

NAME (Type or print)

Steve Greenberg

SIGNATURE (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically)

 s/STEVEN A. GREENBERG

FIRM GREENBERG TRIAL LAWYERS

STREET ADDRESS 53 W. JACKSON BLVD. SUITE 1260

CITY/STATE/ZIP CHICAGO, IL 60604

ID NUMBER (SEE ITEM 3 IN INSTRUCTIONS) 6193478 TELEPHONE NUMBER 312-879-9500

ARE YOU ACTING AS LEAD COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? (Enter “Y” or “N”) Y

ARE YOU ACTING AS LOCAL COUNSEL IN THIS CASE? (Enter “Y” or “N”) Y

ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THIS COURT’S TRIAL BAR? (Enter “Y” or “N”) Y

IF THIS CASE REACHES TRIAL, WILL YOU ACT AS THE TRIAL ATTORNEY? (Enter “Y” or “N”) Y

IF THIS IS A CRIMINAL CASE, USE AN “X” TO DESCRIBE YOUR STATUS IN THIS CASE.

RETAINED COUNSEL YES APPOINTED COUNSEL

Case: 1:20-cr-00035 Document #: 9 Filed: 01/26/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:30
Exhibit A

Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 1 of 34 PageID #:7
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 2 of 34 PageID #:8
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 3 of 34 PageID #:9
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 4 of 34 PageID #:10
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 5 of 34 PageID #:11
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 6 of 34 PageID #:12
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 7 of 34 PageID #:13
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 8 of 34 PageID #:14
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 9 of 34 PageID #:15
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 10 of 34 PageID #:16
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 11 of 34 PageID #:17
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 12 of 34 PageID #:18
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 13 of 34 PageID #:19
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 14 of 34 PageID #:20
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 15 of 34 PageID #:21
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 16 of 34 PageID #:22
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 17 of 34 PageID #:23
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 18 of 34 PageID #:24
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 19 of 34 PageID #:25
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 20 of 34 PageID #:26
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 21 of 34 PageID #:27
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 22 of 34 PageID #:28
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 23 of 34 PageID #:29
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 24 of 34 PageID #:30
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 25 of 34 PageID #:31
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 26 of 34 PageID #:32
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 27 of 34 PageID #:33
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 28 of 34 PageID #:34
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 29 of 34 PageID #:35
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 30 of 34 PageID #:36
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 31 of 34 PageID #:37
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 32 of 34 PageID #:38
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 33 of 34 PageID #:39
Case: 1:20-cv-00390 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 01/17/20 Page 34 of 34 PageID #:40
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

INVENTUS POWER, INC., and ICC 

ELECTRONICS (DONGGUAN) LTD. 

 Plaintiffs,

v. 

SHENZHEN ACE BATTERY CO., LTD., 

 Defendant.

CASE NO. 20-cv-3375

Judge: Robert M. Dow, Jr. 

Magistrate Judge: Jeffrey I. Cummings

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

Counsel for Defendant, Glacier Law LLP, moves as follows pursuant to Local Rule 83.17 of the 

Northern District of Illinois: 

1. Glacier Law LLP hereby moves this Court, pursuant to Local Rule 83.17 for leave to 

withdraw the appearance of Jessica Tovrov as counsel for Defendant in this action. Jessica Tovrov is no 

longer retained by the Defendant in this case. 

2. Glacier Law LLP and its attorneys of record, continue to represent Defendant. 

3. The withdrawal of Jessica Tovrov is not interposed for purposes of harassment or delay, 

and no party will be prejudiced by the Court’s granting of this motion. 

4. Wherefore, Glacier Law LLP moves this Honorable Court for an Order granting leave to 

withdraw Jessica Tovrov as counsel for Defendant and that the minute order direct the Court Clerk to 

remove her from the service list. 

Date: April 4, 2022 /s/ Wei Wang 

Wei Wang, Esq. 

Wei.Wang@glacier.law

Glacier Law LLP 

200 Park Avenue, Suite1703 

New York, NY 10166

Case: 1:20-cv-03375 Document #: 221 Filed: 04/04/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:5894
www.glacier.law 

Tel: +1 (332) 208-8882 

Fax: +1 (312) 801-4587 

Attorney for Defendant 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-03375 Document #: 221 Filed: 04/04/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:5895
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this April 4, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing file with 

the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, and service was perfected on all counsel of record and 

interested parties through this system, which will deliver a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

documents via CM/ECF. 

Date: April 4, 2022 /s/ Wei Wang 

Wei Wang, Esq.

Case: 1:20-cv-03375 Document #: 221 Filed: 04/04/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:5896
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Stacy Holtz","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/stacy-a-holtznasa-gov\/","title":"STS-67","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"F5TPH3F1S8\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-67\/\">STS-67<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-67\/embed\/#?secret=F5TPH3F1S8\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-67” — NASA\" data-secret=\"F5TPH3F1S8\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/STS067-S-002\/STS067-S-002~large.jpg?w=600&h=1536&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1536}
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

*CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Granite City Food & Brewery Ltd. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 28, 2003, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Steven J. Wagenheim, President and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Dated:  November  12, 2003 | By     | /s/ Steven  J. Wagenheim               |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 |   | Steven J.  Wagenheim                   |
|                                 |   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted), Edward T. Shonsey, the Chief Executive Officer of Diversa Corporation (the Company), and Anthony E. Altig, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic
Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:
November 1, 2006



|                        |  |  |  |                                                           
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|/s/ EDWARD T. SHONSEY   |  |  |  | /s/ ANTHONY E. ALTIG                                      
|Edward T. Shonsey       |  |  |  | Anthony E. Altig                                          
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filling of Diversa Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form
10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### William Bigbee v. Robert E. Bigbee.

*Specific performance*— Pleading—Averments *of payment to defendant.*

A bill for the specific performance of a parol agreement to convey land sufficiently avers payment to the defendant if it avers payment to a third person, under the arrangement, and the proofs show that it was so made by defendant’s direction and for his benefit.

The disposition of an appellate court in chancery to be governed by the conclusions of a trial judge who has heard the witnesses examined in open court, is fortified where the record tends to show that the demeanor of the witnesses was of some importance in determining what reliance should be placed upon their'statements.

Appeal from Lake. (Judkins, J.)

April 19.

April 25.

Specific performance. Defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

*C. M. Beardsley*for complainant.

*White & McMahon*for defendant.

Campbell, J.

Complainant filed his bill to obtain specific performance of a parol agreement to convey forty acres of land, for which he claims to have paid one hundred dollars to John Bigbee, a brother of defendant, under the arrangement. It may be remarked here that if the agreement is otherwise made out it does not occur to us that this payment was not properly averred in setting out the contract as a payment to be made to defendant and so made in fact. If made to John for his benefit and by his direction, it was in law a payment to defendant.

The part performance consisted, as alleged, in addition to this payment, of possession and improvements.

Upon the testimony there can be no doubt of the payment to John, and none of sufficient acts of part performance, in case there was a contract. There is positive evidence of the agreement, and in our opinion the circumstances corroborate it. Defendant himself says complainant *468was to have tbe use of the land, and on various occasions acted as if he had at least a valuable interest in it. Defendant’s wife indicates distinctly that the claim was set up early, and that complainant paid the $100 to John for John’s interest in defendant’s land, and this forty acres was the land referred to, which originally was to have belonged to John and was practically turned over by his consent to complainant. It was assessed to complainant by defendant when supervisor, as well as by other assessing officers.

There is some conflict in regard to a considerable part of the facts, but we think the complainant has made out his case by sufficient proof and is entitled to his decree. The judge below who saw the witnesses and heard them testify came to that conclusion. There are many things appearing in the minutes which tend to show that the demeanor of the witnesses was of some importance in determining what reliance should be placed on their statements.

¥e are of opinion that the decree should not be disturbed, and it must be affirmed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.
Exhibit 31.3


                         Independent Accountant's Report


      Lehman ABS Corporation, as Depositor
      745 Seventh Avenue
      New York, New York 10019

      U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee
      Corporate Trust Department
      100 Wall Street
      New York, NY 10005

      Re:   Corporate Backed Trust Certificates, Goldman Sachs Capital I
            Securities-Backed Series 2004-7 Trust (the "Trust")

      Ladies and Gentlemen:

      We have examined assertions of Lehman ABS Corporation (the "Depositor")
      and U.S. Bank National Association, (the "Trustee" and, together with the
      Depositor, the "Management") that the Depositor and the Trustee have
      complied, in all material respects, with the provisions of the Standard
      Terms for Trust Agreements dated as of January 16, 2001, as supplemented
      by a series supplement dated as of April 30, 2004 (together, the "Trust
      Agreement") in respect of the Corporate Backed Trust Certificates, Goldman
      Sachs Capital I Securities-Backed Series 2004-7 Trust (the "Trust"),
      during the period covered by the annual report on Form 10-K filed by the
      Depositor on behalf of the Trust for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the
      "Annual Report"). Management is responsible for compliance with the Trust
      Agreement. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Management's
      assertions based on our examination.

      Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
      American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,
      included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Depositor's and
      the Trustee's compliance with the Trust Agreement and performing such
      other procedures as considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
      that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      In our opinion, the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all
      material respects, with the Trust Agreement during the period covered by
      the Annual Report and Management's assertions with respect to such
      compliance are fairly stated, in all material respects, for the year ended
      December 31, 2007.


      /s/ Aston Bell, CPA


      New York, New York
      March 14, 2008


                                 ASTON BELL, CPA
{"id":3217,"count":21,"description":"","link":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/spacesuits\/","name":"Spacesuits","slug":"spacesuits","taxonomy":"category","parent":2656,"meta":{"redirect":"","media-tag":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/3217"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/taxonomies\/category"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/2656"}],"wp:post_type":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts?categories=3217"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/hdsnav?categories=3217"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic?categories=3217"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/gallery?categories=3217"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/reference?categories=3217"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/mission?categories=3217"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/feature?categories=3217"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press-release?categories=3217"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/stem-content?categories=3217"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/people?categories=3217"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/event?categories=3217"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/image-article?categories=3217"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/nasa-blog?categories=3217"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages?categories=3217"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/migration?categories=3217"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/podcast?categories=3217"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6344

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

VANCE MARCEL GIBSON, a/k/a Reginald Hilton Belton,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. James A. Beaty, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (6:93-cr-00211-WLO-1)

Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 8, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vance Marcel Gibson, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, 

Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Vance Marcel Gibson appeals the district court’s 

orders denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed,

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and his motion for 

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s 

orders for the reasons stated there. See United States v. 

Gibson, No. 6:93-cr-00211-WLO-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 22 & May 11, 

2010). Further, we deny Gibson’s motion for the appointment of 

counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED