alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



---



FORM 10-Q/A



---



Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934



For
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002



Commission File
Number 000-24051



---



UNITED PANAM FINANCIAL CORP.

(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its charter)



---



|                                                               |  |                                        
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|California                                                     |  | 95-3211687                             
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)



3990 Westerly Place,
Suite 200

Newport Beach, CA 92660

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(949) 224-1917

(Registrants telephone number, including area code)



---



Indicate by
check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No ̈



Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes ̈No  x



The number of shares outstanding of the Registrants Common Stock as of August 2, 2002 was 15,571,400 shares.



---



---

EXPLANATORY NOTE



This quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A amends our original quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002
as of the date of filing the original Form 10-Q on August 12, 2002. We are amending the original quarterly report for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 to correct and restate the consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2002.
The restated numbers for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 and a further explanation about the restatements are included in the annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003, which was filed on September 3, 2004.



---

SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.



|                       |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: October 26, 2004 |  | United PanAm Financial Corp.         
|                       | 
|                       |  | /s/ Ray Thousand                     
|                       |  | Ray Thousand                         
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
|                       |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
H. Res. 324

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 12, 1997.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill (H.R.

2607) making appropriations for the government of the District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or

in part against the revenues of said District for the fiscal

year ending September 30, 1998, and for other purposes,

with Senate amendments thereto, and to consider in the

House, any rule of the House to the contrary notwithstanding, a single motion offered by the chairman of the Committee on Appropriations or his designee that the House concur

in the Senate amendment to the text with the amendment

printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution and disagree to the Senate amendment to

the title. The Senate amendments and the motion shall be

considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one

hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on
2

•HRES 324 EH

the motion to final adoption without intervening motion or

demand for division of the question.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWABS, INC.
                   ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES TRUST 2004-BC2
                   ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-BC2


      The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP (a
"Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16 of
the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

      (i)   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
      preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer
      under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

      (ii)  To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master
      Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout
      such year.




/s/ Joseph M. Candelario                              Dated: March 29, 2005
------------------------

JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Mark Wong                                         Dated: March 29, 2005
-------------

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
---

EXHIBIT 32.2





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the annual report of Mercantile Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael P. McGrath, Executive Vice President, Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.     The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.


/s/ Michael P. McGrathMichael P. McGrath

Executive Vice President, Treasurer, Secretary and

Chief Financial Officer



April 15, 2011
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8and Form S-3 of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. of our report dated November 10, 2005, with respect to ouraudits of the consolidated financial statements of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as ofSeptember 30, 2005 and for each of the two years in the year ended September 30, 2005,which is included in the Annual Report on Amendment No. 1 to Form10-KSB/A for the year ended September 30, 2005.We also consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-3.Eisner LLPNew York, New York
#### Estes *v.*State.

Opinion delivered December 9, 1929.

*W. U. McCabe,*for appellant.

*Hal L. Norwood,*Attorney General, and *Robert F. Smith,*Assistant, for appellee.

McHaney, J.

This is an appeal from, an order of the court overruling’ appellant’s motion to withdraw a plea of guilty to an indictment for grand larceny and permit him to enter a plea of not guilty instead. This motion was filed and overruled before judgment. 'The plea of guilty was put in by the appellant himself, in open court, which is the only way it can be made. Section 3075, C. & M. Dig. By § 3076 it is provided that: “At any time before judgment the court may permit the plea of guilty to be withdrawn and a plea of not guilty to be substituted.” Construing this statute, this court has many times held that it is within the discretion of the trial court to refuse to permit a defendant to withdraw his plea of guilty and to substitute a plea of not guilty, and that such action will not be reversed by this court unless it clearly appears that its discretion in this regard has been abused. *Greene*v. *State,*88 Ark. 290, 114 S. W. 177; *Joiner*v. *State,*94 Ark. 198, 126 S. W. 723; *Duncan*v. *State,*125 Ark. 4, 187 S. W. 906; *Dudney*v. *State,*136 Ark. 453, 266 S. W. 898; *McClain*v. *State,*165 Ark. 48, 262 S. W. 987.

Did the trial court abuse its discretion in this case? We think not. The record shows that the court explained the nature of the charge in the indictment to appellant, and asked him whether or not he was guilty of the crime of grand larceny as charged in the indictment, “and he *634stated that he was, whereupon the court explained that the penalty attendant upon such crime is from one to five years in the State Penitentiary, and he, being further asked, with the foregoing information before him, if he still desired to enter his plea of gnilty of the crime of grand larceny,” he answered that he did, and the court accepted his plea.

There is no showing that appellant did not understand the nature of the charge. There were two indictments for larceny — one for stealing the cattle of James and' one for stealing the cattle of Minge. He pleaded guilty to stealing Minge’s cattle. He knew the extent of the punishment provided by law, and admitted that the court fully explained the matter to him.

The record fails to reflect any abuse of discretion of the court in any manner, and the judgment must accordingly be affirmed. It is so ordered.