alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66730-66731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26607]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID SEP for Career Development 
Grant Applications.
    Date: December 2, 2014.
    Time: 11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20892982 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Zhuqing (Charlie) Li, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer Scientific Review Program Division of Extramural Activities, 
National Institutes of Health/NIAID 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-402-9523, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3f45574a4e5651581153567f51565711585049"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aed4c6dbdfc7c0c980c2c7eec0c7c680c9c1d8">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Peer Review Meeting.
    Date: December 3-4, 2014.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place:

[[Page 66731]]

    Hilton Washington/Rockville Jackson Conference Room, 1750 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Andrea L. Wurster, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, DEA/NIAID/NIH/DHHS, Room 3259, 
6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC-7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-761, 301-451-
2660, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f78082858483928596b79a969e9bd9999e9fd9909881"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="304745424344554251705d51595c1e5e59581e575f46">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

     Dated: November 4, 2014.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-26607 Filed 11-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with Annual Report of Kid Castle
      Educational Corporation, a Florida Corporation (the “Registrant”), on Form 10-Q
      for the fiscal period ending September 30, 2006 filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission , the undersigned hereby certifies that:





1.
      To the
      best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      To the
      best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of
      the Registrant.





DATE:
              May 21, 2007
            BY:
            */s/
              MIN TAN YANG*MIN
              TAN YANGCHIEF
              EXECUTIVE OFFICER




DATE:
              May 21, 2007
            BY:
            /s/
              *SUANG-YI
              PAI*SUANG-YI
              PAICHIEF
              FINANCIAL OFFICER
# FILED

October 1, 199 7 Cecil Crowson, Jr
. App ellate C ou rt Clerk IN THE COUR T OF CRIMIN AL APPEALS OF TENN ESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE JUNE 1997 SES SION

WILLIAM DAVID CLAPP, ) ) Appellant, ) No. 03C01-9605- CC-00193

) ) Sullivan County v. ) ) Honorable Fr

ank L. Slaught er, Judge ) STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) (Post-Conv iction) ) Appellee. )
For the Appell ant : For the Appell ee : William David Clapp, Pro Se Charles W. Burson Reg. No. 044 05-084 Attorney Gen eral of Tennessee P.O. Box 4000 Knox-A and Manchester, K

Y 40962-4000 Sarah M. Branch (AT TRIAL & ON APPEAL) Assistant Att orney Gener al of Tennessee 450 James Roberts on Parkway Kenneth F. Irvine, Jr. Nashvil le, TN 37243-0493 606 W. Main Street, Suite 350 P.O. Box 84 H. Greeley We lles, Jr. Knoxvil le, TN 37901-0084 Distric t Attorney General (ON APPEAL) and Barry P. Staubus Assistant D istrict A

ttorney Gener

al P.O. Box 526 Blountvil le, TN 37617-0526

OPINION FILE D:____________________

AFFIRMED Joseph M. Tipton Judge2 O P I N I O N

The petitioner, William Dav id Clapp, appeal s as of right from the Sulliv

an County Cr iminal Court ’s dismiss al of his petiti on for post-conv iction rel ief. The trial court dismis sed the petition , concluding that it w as barred by the statute of li mitations. We af firm the judgment of the trial cour t.

The petitioner c ollaterall y challeng es convic tions he recei ved in 1978 and 1980 as the resul t of guilty pleas. He fil ed the present peti tion for post-c onviction relief March 4, 1996. He argues that his petit ion was fil ed timely und er the 1995 PostConvicti on Procedure Ac t. However, in Arnold Cart er v. Stat e , No. 03-S-01-9612-CR00117, Monroe County (Tenn . Sept. 8, 1997) (for pub lication), our supreme court held that the 1995 Act di d not reinstate a filing per iod for post-con viction cases relati ve to convicti ons for whic h the former three- year post- convicti on statute of limit ations had already r un. The judgment of the trial cour t is affirmed.

Joseph M. Tipton, Judge

CONCUR:

John H. Peay , Judge

Curwood Witt, Judge
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit (10)(a)






                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the use in the Statement of Additional Information
constituting part of this Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration
Statement on Form N-4 (the "Registration Statement") of our report dated
February 6, 2004, relating to the financial statements of New York Life
Insurance and Annuity Corporation, and of our report dated February 18, 2004,
relating to the financial statements of New York Life Insurance and Annuity
Corporation Variable Annuity Separate Account IV, which appear in such Statement
of Additional Information.  We also consent to the references to us under the
headings "Financial Statements" and "Condensed Financial Information" in such
Registration Statement.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
-----------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


New York, New York
May 25, 2004
H. Res. 348

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 5, 1998.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2846) to prohibit spending Federal education

funds on national testing without explicit and specific legislation. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with.

General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman

and ranking minority member of the Committee on Education and the Workforce. After general debate the bill shall

be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It

shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Education and the Workforce now printed in the

bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute

shall be considered as read. During consideration of the bill
2

•HRES 348 EH

for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole

may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the

Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed

in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for

that purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request

for a recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five

minutes the minimum time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without

intervening business, provided that the minimum time for

electronic voting on the first in any series of questions shall

be fifteen minutes. At the conclusion of consideration of the

bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the

bill to the House with such amendments as may have been

adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the

House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the

Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final
3

•HRES 348 EH

passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Elizabeth Shanklin *v.*Isaac C. Overby, etc.

Wills — Capacity—Influence—Conflicting. Evidence — Second Verdict.

The Court of Appeals will not reverse a second judgment against the validity of a will, where the evidence as to the capacity of the testator and the undue influence over her is conflicting, especially when it is in accord with the judgment of the county court.

APPEAL FROM FLEMING CIRCUIT COURT.

October 5, 1872.

*Botts, for appellant.*

*Andrews & PMster, for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Hardin :

The evidence in relation to the capacity of Margaret Shanklin to make a will and the influence of her sister, Elizabeth, over her, is so conflicting and unsatisfactory that we do not feel at liberty to reverse the judgment, based, as it is, on a second verdict against the validity of the will, found also in accordance with the judgment of the county court.

This judgment is therefore affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

John McDonald,

Plaintiff,

v.

Governor JB Pritzker and Grace B. Hou,

Defendants.

No. 20 C 3653

Hon. Rebecca R. Pallmeyer

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 

OVERLENGTH BRIEF INSTANTER

Pursuant to Northern District of Illinois LR 7.1, Defendants JB Pritzker, in his official 

capacity as the Governor of Illinois, and Grace B. Hou, in her official capacity as the Secretary of 

the Illinois Department of Human Services, by their attorney Kwame Raoul, Attorney General for 

the State of Illinois, respectfully move for leave to file a 42-page Opposition to Plaintiff’s 

Emergency Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. In support of 

this motion, Defendants state as follows:

1. Plaintiff has filed a 15-page memorandum in support of his motion for temporary 

restraining order. ECF No. 7. Additionally, Plaintiff filed two declarations in support of the motion 

with a total of 18 exhibits attached to the declarations that exceed 100 pages. ECF Nos. 8-9.

2. Plaintiff has asserted that he is entitled to relief under multiple legal theories and Plaintiff’s 

filings raise questions of tremendous importance to the parties and the public at large regarding 

Defendants’ actions to address the deadly and unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic.

3. Under these circumstances, Defendants believe a 42-page memorandum in opposition to 

Plaintiff’s motion will aid the Court in deciding these momentous questions. A 42-page 

memorandum will allow Defendants to fully address not only Plaintiff’s claims but the standards 
pertaining the extraordinary injunctive remedy Plaintiff seeks from the Court. This request is not 

for an improper purpose, and it will not prejudice Plaintiff.

WHEREFORE, Defendants respectfully request that the Court grant their motion for leave to 

file a 42-page brief instanter in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order 

and permanent injunction. Defendants’ brief was filed concurrently with this motion.

Dated: June 29, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

KWAME RAOUL

Attorney General of Illinois

/s/ Amanda L. Kozar 

Amanda L. Kozar

Mary A. Johnston

Sarah Newman

Michael Dierkes

Office of the Illinois Attorney General

100 West Randolph Street

Chicago, Illinois 60601

Counsel for JB Pritzker and Grace B. Hou
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on June 29, 2020, I caused a copy of the foregoing State Defendants’ Memorandum 

in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction 

to be filed electronically on CM/ECF, which will cause a notice of filing to be sent to all counsel 

of record who have entered appearances.

/s/ Amanda L. Kozar
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Pan Am Financial Corp (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for theperiod ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Ray Thousand certifies in his capacity as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that to his knowledge: 

 

(a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 

 

(b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto signed this Certification asof November 24, 2004.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 249 Agreed to House (ATH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 249

 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 1997

Mr. Armey submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, 
elected to the following standing committee of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on Standards of Official Conduct: Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. 
Hefley, Mr. Goodlatte, and Mr. Knollenberg.
                                 <all>
```
H. Res. 331

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 13, 1997.

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and he

is hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the

House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVERSIGHT: Mr. Miller of Florida.

Attest:

Clerk.
1 The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-2441

___________ Vincent M. Ventimiglia, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Anthony Twist; City of Arnold, MO; * Eastern District of Missouri. Robert T. Shockey; Karen Olejniczak; * Paul D’Agrosa, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: April 25, 2005 Filed: May 5, 2005

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Vincent M. Ventimiglia appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons the district court stated. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,284
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,741
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,580)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,500
<PP&E>                                          10,726
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 199,939
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,044
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           118
<OTHER-SE>                                     119,167
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,285
<SALES>                                         56,367
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,367
<CGS>                                           34,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,929
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,024
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,033
<INCOME-TAX>                                       434
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                599
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       599
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1519
ELSAYED ELFEKY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District Judge. (2:05-cv-00296-WDK) Submitted: November 15, 2006 Decided: November 17, 2006 Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elsayed Elfeky, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Travis Coberly, VANDERVENTER & BLACK, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Elsayed Elfeky seeks to appeal from the entry of a consent agreement in his civil action. SeeElfeky v. United States , 2:05-cv-00296-WDK (E.D. Va. Apr. 14, 2006). Absent circumstances not present here, we will not entertain an appeal from a consent judgment. See Cohen v. Va. Elec. & Power Co. , 788 F.2d 247, 249 (4th Cir. 1986); Thonen v. Jenkins , 455 F.2d 977, 977 (4th Cir. 1972). Accordingly, we dismiss Elfeky’s appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 330 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 139
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 330

                          [Report No. 105-406]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2267) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, 
Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and related agencies for the fiscal 
        year ending September 30, 1998, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 1997

     Mr. Goss, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2267) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, 
Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and related agencies for the fiscal 
        year ending September 30, 1998, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
2267) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, Justice, 
and State, the Judiciary, and related agencies for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 1998, and for other purposes. All points of order 
against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. 
The conference report shall be considered as read.
                                     

                                                 House Calendar No. 139

105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 330

                          [Report No. 105-406]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2267) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, 
Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and related agencies for the fiscal 
        year ending September 30, 1998, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 13, 1997

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```