alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Robert McNay *v.*William Harris.

Trespass — Action for — Actual Possession — Not Necessary to Show Chain of Title to Commonwealth — Limitations.

This being an action for trespass to real property, actual possession, at the time of the entry of appellant was sufficient to enable appellee to maintain his suit. It was not necessary that he should show a perfect chain of title back to the commonwealth, nor an actual adverse holding for the term of fifteen years preceding the alleged trespass.

APPEAL PROM CAMPBELL CIRCUIT COURT.

January 15, 1872.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

This being an action for trespass to real property, actual possession, at the time of the entry of appellant, was sufficient to enable appellee to maintain his suit. It was not necessary that he should show a perfect chain of title back to the commonwealth, nor an actual adverse holding for the term of fifteen years preceding the alleged trespass. For these reasons the instructions given at the instance of the appellee, all of which make his right to recover, depend upon whether the land is covered by the deeds under which he claims title, or an actual adverse possession for fifteen years, are less favorable to him than they should have been.

*105
      *Riley, Menzies & Furber, for appellant.*

*Ducker, Hawkins, Boden, for appellee.*

The testimony shows that ¡there is an ancient marked line running from the -corners B and C as laid1 down on the plat made out by the surveyor Rogers. There is evidence conducing to show that appellee held to this line and that within a short time before the commission of this alleged trespass, McNay recognized the fact that his possession extended to this line.

It is true that there is some contrariety of evidence on the question of possession, but we can not say that the preponderance is against the finding of the jury.

The instructions -given on the motion of appellant are certainly as favorable as the law of the case would warrant.

The judgment of the circuit count must be affirmed. -
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Smart Skies: LineUp with Math","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"NUDAy5paMe\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/smart-skies-lineup-with-math\/\">Smart Skies: LineUp with Math<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/smart-skies-lineup-with-math\/embed\/#?secret=NUDAy5paMe\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Smart Skies: LineUp with Math” — NASA\" data-secret=\"NUDAy5paMe\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/line-up-with-math-1.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":379}
67673204v.1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

DAWON A. WORDLAW, on behalf of herself 

and all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF 

CHICAGO, LLC; ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS, 

INC., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 20-cv-03200 

Hon. Manish S. Shah 

Hon. Magistrate Gabriel A. Fuentes 

DEFENDANTS ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF CHICAGO, LLC AND 

ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS, INC.’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 

Defendants Enterprise Leasing Company of Chicago, LLC and Enterprise Holdings, Inc. 

(collectively, “Defendants”) respectfully move pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 for the Court to 

reconsider its December 21, 2020 Memorandum Opinion and Order (“Order,” ECF No. 30) and 

enter an order dismissing Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint for the reasons stated in the 

accompanying Memorandum of Law. 

DATED: January 20, 2021 Respectfully submitted, 

ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF 

CHICAGO, LLC and ENTERPRISE 

HOLDINGS, INC. 

By /s/ Thomas E. Ahlering

 One of Their Attorneys 

Case: 1:20-cv-03200 Document #: 33 Filed: 01/20/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:237
2 

67673204v.1 

Erin Dougherty Foley 

edfoley@seyfarth.com

Thomas E. Ahlering

tahlering@seyfarth.com 

Alexandra S. Oxyer 

aoxyer@seyfarth.com 

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

233 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 8000 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

Telephone: 312-460-5000 

Facsimile: 312-460-7000

Case: 1:20-cv-03200 Document #: 33 Filed: 01/20/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:238
3 

67673204v.1 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this 20th day of January, 2021, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing document was filed with the Clerk of Court by using the CM/ECF system which will 

send notification to the e-mail addresses of all counsel of record denoted on the electronic Mail 

Notice List. 

/s/Thomas E. Ahlering

Thomas E. Ahlering 

Case: 1:20-cv-03200 Document #: 33 Filed: 01/20/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:239
| (1)   | The      Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31,      2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date      hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;      and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|            |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| (2)   | Information      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of the      dates and for the periods expressed in the  Report.                                                                                                 |

----
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, C. Dean Metropoulos, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of Pinnacle Foods Group Inc., certifythat:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Pinnacle Foods Group Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s twenty-one weeks endedDecember 26, 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date: March 28, 2005    /s/ C. DEAN METROPOULOS    C. Dean Metropoulos Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 70

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit multicandidate political committee contributions and expenditures in elections

for Federal office.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 7, 1997

Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina (for himself and Mr. SANFORD) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Oversight

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

prohibit multicandidate political committee contributions

and expenditures in elections for Federal office.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF MULTICANDIDATE POLITICAL

4 COMMITTEE CONTRIBUTIONS AND EXPENDI5 TURES IN ELECTIONS FOR FEDERAL OFFICE.

6 Title III of the Federal Election Campaign Act of

7 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431 et seq.) is amended by adding at the

8 end the following new section:
2

•HR 70 IH

1 ‘‘PROHIBITION OF MULTICANDIDATE POLITICAL

2 COMMITTEE CONTRIBUTIONS AND EXPENDITURES

3 ‘‘SEC. 323. Notwithstanding any other provision of

4 this Act, no person other than a principal campaign com5 mittee or an individual may make or receive contributions

6 or make expenditures with respect to an election for Fed7 eral office.’’.

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Astronaut Nick Hague","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"oG3QUrmmeN\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/astronaut-nick-hague\/\">Astronaut Nick Hague<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/astronaut-nick-hague\/embed\/#?secret=oG3QUrmmeN\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Astronaut Nick Hague” — NASA\" data-secret=\"oG3QUrmmeN\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/nhq202001130003.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
#### Cleveland & Scott *v.*Phillipps & Ison.

Injunction — Action on Bond — 'Petition—Demurrer.

The petition alleges the execution of the injunction bond, the dissolution and the dismissal of the action. It also recites the amount of the judgment enjoined and the failure of the appellants to pay. The demurrer therefore was properly overruled.

APPEAL PROM JESSAMINE CIRCUIT COURT.

September 29, 1871.

*Huston, for appellants.*

*Bronaugh, for appellees.*

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

We perceive no error in the judgment rendered in this case.

The petition alleges the execution of the injunction bound by the appellant, the dissolution of the injunction and the dismissal of the action; it also recites the amount of the judgment enjoined and the failure of the appellant to pay, etc. The demurrer therefore was properly overruled.

The answer filed by the appellants presented no defense to the action. They admit the execution of the bond, and in an absence of a compliance with its conditions are liable for the amount of the judgment enjoined.

The judgment is *affirmed.*
Order entered July 13, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01493-CV

IN RE TIMOTHY GILLUM, TRUSTEE OF THE GILLUM FAMILY MASTER 

HERITAGE TRUST AND REEF R. GILLUM, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-03816

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY the petition for writ of mandamus. 

We VACATE our order dated November 24, 2014 staying the trial court’s October 29, 2014 

Judgment of Contempt. We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
#### Crouch *v.*Martin.

A verdict in detinue was as follows: “We, the jury, find the property named in the declaration to be in the plaintiff and find the value thereof to be *60 dol- .*lars.” *Meld,*that the. judgment should be an-ested, the verdict not ■ showing an unlawful detainer of the property.

APPEAL from the *Fountain*Circuit Court.

Stevens, *J.*

Martin declared against *Crouch*in an action of detinue, for unlawfully detaining from him a certain grey mare, of the value of 60 dollars, of his proper goods and chattels, and to his damage 100 dollars. An issue was joined on the general plea of *non*detinet, which was tried by a jury, and a verdict *257found for the plaintiff in these weirds, — “We, the jury, find the property named in the declaration to be in the plaintiff, and find the value thereof to be 60 dollars;” upon which the defendant moved in arrest of judgment, but the motion was overruled and final judgment rendered on the verdict for the plaintiff. . '

*A. S. White*and *I. Naylor,*for the appellant.

*D. Wallace,*for the appellee.

The only question before this Court is, whether the verdict is sufficient to authorise the rendition of final judgment for the plaintiff?

The issue in the case is, whether the defendant unlawfully detained the property of the plaintiff as stated in the declaration ? the *gravamen*of the issue is the detention. The plaintiff, to recover, had to prove three things, — 1. property in himself; 2. an unlawful detention by the defendant; and 3. the value. The jury have found but two of those facts. .They have found the property to be in the plaintiff, and its value; but the unlawful detention .thereof, which is the main and principal point in issue, they have not found.

A verdict must answer all the material points in issue; but a general verdict, that in substance covers the whole, is sufficient; as in this case, if the jury had simply found for the plaintiff, and found the value of the property, &c., it would have been sufficient; for the finding for the plaintiff would have been, substantially, finding property in the plaintiff, and the unlawful detention of it by the defendant; but as it is, it is wholly. defective. The judgment should have been arrested (1).

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed, and the verdict set aside, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

(1)

 When a judgment is arrested for. defects in *the verdict,*a *venire de nova*must be awarded; that is, another jury must be summoned to try the issue, Gould on Pl. 526.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

BEAU WILLIAM CHERMER,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 486 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of March, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 1

Electing officers of the House of Representatives.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 7, 1997

Mr. BOEHNER submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Electing officers of the House of Representatives.

Resolved, That Robin H. Carle, of the Commonwealth of

Virginia, be, and she is hereby, chosen Clerk of the House

of Representatives;

That Wilson S. Livingood, of the Commonwealth of

Virginia, be, and he is hereby, chosen Sergeant at Arms of

the House of Representatives; and

That Reverend James David Ford, of the Commonwealth of Virginia, be, and he is hereby, chosen Chaplain of

the House of Representatives.

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Rachael Whitefield","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/rachaellwhitefield-2-2-2\/","title":"NASA Astronaut Jack Hathaway","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"IKA0qqk5sE\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/nasa-astronaut-jack-hathaway\/\">NASA Astronaut Jack Hathaway<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/nasa-astronaut-jack-hathaway\/embed\/#?secret=IKA0qqk5sE\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Astronaut Jack Hathaway” — NASA\" data-secret=\"IKA0qqk5sE\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/astronaut_candidate_jack_hathaway.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":750}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Beginner’s Guide to Aeronautics","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"TcaOcuZz7f\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/beginners-guide-to-aeronautics\/\">Beginner’s Guide to Aeronautics<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/beginners-guide-to-aeronautics\/embed\/#?secret=TcaOcuZz7f\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Beginner’s Guide to Aeronautics” — NASA\" data-secret=\"TcaOcuZz7f\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/edu_srch_beginners_guide_to_aeronautics_0.png?w=320","thumbnail_width":320,"thumbnail_height":201}