alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ALEXIS TAYLOR , 1 Respondent Below , Appellant,

v.
GREG POWELL , Petitioner Below, Appellee. § § § No. 215, 2015 § § Court Below

— Family Court § of the State of Delaware, § in and for New Castle County § File No. CN02

- 9338 § Petition No. 14

- 20199 § §

Submitted: May 18 , 2015 Decided: May 20 , 2015
Before HOLLAND , VALIHURA , and VAUGHN , Justices.
ORDER
This 20 th day of May 2015 , it appears to the Court that : (1) On April 29, 2015 , the Court received the appellant’s notice of appeal
from a January 21, 2015 Family Court order finding the appellant in contempt of a

c onsent support order

. Under Supreme Court Rule 6 (a)(i ) , a timely notice of appeal should have been filed on or before February 20, 2015

. (2) On April 30, 2015 , t he Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing

t he appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as untimely filed under Supreme Cour t Rule 6. In h er response to the notice to show cause , the

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).2

a ppellant stated that the January 21, 2015 order did not include information regarding the appeal process or the deadline for filing an appeal

. The appellant
further state d that she sent a letter to the Family Court judge within the thirty day time period, but did not receive a response. (3) Time is a jurisdictional requirement. 2 A notice of appeal must be received by the Office of the Clerk of this Court within the applicable time period
in order to be effective. 3 An appellant’s pro se status does not excuse a failure to comply strictly with the jurisdictional requirements of S upreme Court Rule 6. 4 Unless an appellant can demonstrate that the failure to file a timely notice of appeal is attributable to court

- related personnel, an untimely appeal cannot be
considered. 5 (4) There is nothing in the record before us reflecting that the appellant's failure to file a timely notice of appeal is attributable to court

- related personnel. Consequently, this case does not fall within the exception to the general rule that

2 Carr v. State , 554 A.2d 778, 779 (Del. 1989).

3 Supr. Ct. R. 10(a).

4 Carr v. State , 554 A.2d at 779

. See also Oliver v. State , 2011 WL 6016240 , at *1 (Del. Dec. 2, 2011) (dismissing appeal as untimely filed where appellant argued that he was representing himself and un aware of deadline for filing timely notice of appeal)

.
5 Bey v. State , 402 A.2d 362, 363 (Del. 1979).3

mandates the timely filing of a notice of appeal. Thus, the Court concl udes that this appeal must be dismissed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29 (b ),
that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 240

Recognizing Hispanic culture in the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 23, 1997

Mr. PASTOR submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and the Workforce

RESOLUTION

Recognizing Hispanic culture in the United States.

Whereas the Hispanic community represents 10 percent of

the United States population and is expected to become

the largest minority group in the United States in approximately 10 years;

Whereas by 2035, 1 in 5 Americans will be Hispanic;

Whereas Hispanics distinguish themselves as a community

for fostering connections rooted in the Spanish language;

Whereas Hispanics diverse and vibrant culture includes elements originating in Spain, North America, Central

America, South America, the Caribbean, and the Far

East;

Whereas Hispanics share deep family values, recognize their

obligations to the less fortunate in society, protect their
2

•HRES 240 IH

children, cherish freedom, and fulfill their patriotic duty

to defend their country;

Whereas many Hispanic men and women have served this

country with distinction, making important contributions

in the arts and sciences, the business world, academia,

government, agriculture, and the Armed Forces;

Whereas Hispanics have served in the United States Armed

Forces in proportions much larger than their percentage

of the population;

Whereas American society can reap great benefits from greater exposure to Hispanic arts and culture;

Whereas Hispanics constitute only 1 percent of the participants in most major entertainment categories, such as

writers, producers, directors, actors, and filmmakers; and

Whereas the need to increase the visual presence of Hispanics

and create a place in the national conscience can only be

done through the visual realm of entertainment: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) recognizes that Hispanics are an example of

3 community and patriotism and have made rich con4 tributions to this country;

5 (2) wholeheartedly endorses the efforts of the

6 Foundation for the Arts to raise scholarships at the

7 graduate school level for Hispanics interested in

8 film, theater, television, and the music industry;

9 (3) salutes actor Jimmy Smits for his leader10 ship and commitment to bring excellence to the His-
3

•HRES 240 IH

1 panic community by his creation of the National

2 Hispanic Foundation for the Arts; and

3 (4) supports this and any visionary initiative

4 that seeks to promote and protect the contributions

5 of Hispanics to this country.

Æ
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT LAUR A DUR GAR

YAN, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , JR . , Attorne y Ge ne ra l , R

e sponde nt . No. 10-72724 Age n c y No. A079-248-711 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

April 8, 2014 * * Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia B e fore : FER

NANDEZ, N.R . SM ITH, a nd M U R GUIA, C irc uit Judge s. La ura Durga ry an pe titions for re v i e w of the orde r of the B o ard of Im m i gration Appe a l s (B IA) dism issing he r a ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s (IJ) de c ision de ny ing he r a pplic ation for a sy lum , withholding of re m ova l, a nd prote c tion unde r the C onve ntion Against Torture(C AT). W e have jurisdic tion 

# FIL E D APR 14 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. Re vie w for substa ntia l e vide nc e , Ze h aty ev . Gonzale s , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th C ir. 2006), we de ny the pe t ition for re vie w. Eve n if we we re to a ssum e Durga ry an suffe re d from pa st pe rse c ution ba se d on a ny one or a ll thre e inc ide nts, substa ntia l e vide nc e supports the B IA’ s de te rm i nation tha

t the inc ide nts we re not c om m itte d by the Arm e nia

n gove rnm e nt or by forc e s tha

t it wa s una

ble or unwilling to c ontrol. Se eDoev . Holde r , 736 F.3d 871, 878 (9th C ir. 2013) . Substa ntia l e v i de nc e a lso supports the B IA’ s de te rm ination tha

t Durga ry an doe s not ha

ve a we ll-founde d fe ar of future pe rse c ution ba se d on he r Pe nte c osta l re ligion. Durga

ry an fa i le d to pre se nt obje c t ive e vide nc e tha t Pe nte c osta ls in Arm e n ia fa c e pe rse c ution on a c c ount of the ir re ligion. Se eMolina-Estrada v . IN S , 293 F.3d 1089, 1096 (9th C ir. 2002) (“ [T] h e IJ a nd the B IA are e ntitle d to re ly on a ll re le va nt e vide nc e in the re c o rd, inc l uding a State De pa

rtm e nt re port, in c onside ring whe the r the pe titione r ha s de m onstra te d tha t the re is good re a son to fe ar future pe rse c ution.” ). B e c a use Durga

ry an fa i le d to e sta

blish e ligibility

for a sy lum , he r c la im

for withholding of rem o v a l ne c e ssa rily fa ils. Se eZe haty e , 453 F.3d a t 1190. Fina lly , substa

ntia l e v ide nc e supports the B IA’ s de nia l of C AT re l ie f be c a use Durga

ry an fa ile d to e sta

blish tha t she m ore like ly

tha n not will be

torture d 2if she re t

urns to Arm e nia . S

e eSantos-Le mus v . Muk

ase y , 542 F.3d 738, 747-48 (9th C ir. 2008). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

3
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 233

Relating to a question of the privileges of the House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 18, 1997

Mr. MENENDEZ submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Relating to a question of the privileges of the House.

Whereas the privilege of admission to the Hall of the House

or rooms leading thereto is subject to the requirements

of proper decorum;

Whereas concern has arisen that the privilege of admission to

the Hall of the House or rooms leading thereto has become the subject of abuse;

Whereas Representative Menendez of New Jersey has given

notice pursuant to clause 2 of rule IX of his intention to

offer a question of the privileges of the House addressing

that concern; and

Whereas these circumstances warrant an immediate affirmation by the House of its unequivocal commitment to the

principle that every person who exercises the privilege of

admission to the Hall of the House or rooms leading
2

HRES 233 ATH

thereto assumes a concomitant responsibilty to comport

himself in a manner that properly dignifies the proceedings of the House: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Sergeant-at-Arms is instructed to

2 remove former Representative Robert Dornan from the

3 Hall of the House and rooms leading thereto and to pre4 vent him from returning to the Hall of the House and

5 rooms leading thereto until the election contest concerning

6 the forty-sixth district of California is resolved.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**In connection with the filing of the financial statements of Chindex International, Inc.(“Registrant”) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”), the undersigned herebycertifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof Registrant.                                                                        /s/ Roberta Lipson   Roberta Lipson   Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)   “A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ChindexInternational, Inc. and will be retained by Chindex International, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.”
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-06-00457- CV In r e Jo hn R ayRe e d, I II ORI GINAL PRO CEEDING FRO M B ELL COUNTY M E MO R

A N D UM O P I N I O N The pe tition for writ of mandamus is denied. SeeTex. R. App. P . 52.8(a) .

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore J ustices B . A. Smith, P ember ton and Waldrop Filed: Oc tober 6, 2006
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-16-00169-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.J.P., a Child

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-13590

Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 28, 2016

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(1). 

PER CURIAM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Illinois Republican Party, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03489

Honorable Sara L. Ellis

J.B. Pritzker

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, July 2, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The Court denies Plaintiffs'

expedited motion for injunction pending appeal [17]. The Court finds that the balance of

harms and likelihood of success on the merits justify denying Plaintiffs'; request to hold an

event greater than 50 persons on the Fourth of July. Mailed notice(rj, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03489 Document #: 18 Filed: 07/02/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:162
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
               (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



I, YU-EN CHIU, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of Kid
Castle Educational Corporation (the "Registrant"), certifies that to the best of
my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended September 30, 2002 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




      /s/ Yu-En Chiu
------------------------------
Name:  Yu-En Chiu
Date:  May 9, 2003


                                  Exhibit 99.2
IV

House Calendar No. 139

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 330

[Report No. 105–406]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 2267) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and related agencies for the

fiscal year ending September 30, 1998, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 13, 1997

Mr. GOSS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 2267) making appropriations

for the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State,

the Judiciary, and related agencies for the fiscal year

ending September 30, 1998, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 2267) making appropriations for

4 the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Ju5 diciary, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending
2

HRES 330 RH

1 September 30, 1998, and for other purposes. All points

2 of order against the conference report and against its con3 sideration are waived. The conference report shall be con4 sidered as read.

House Calendar No. 139

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 330

[Report No. 105–406]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference reber 30, 1998, and for other purposes. lated agencies for the fiscal year ending Septem- merce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and re- appropriations for the Departments of Com- port to accompany the bill (H.R. 2267) making

NOVEMBER 13, 1997

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 315 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 315

         Relating to a question of the privileges of the House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 8, 1997

 Mr. Gephardt submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                         and laid on the table

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
         Relating to a question of the privileges of the House.

Whereas the election contest concerning the 46th District of California should 
        be dismissed as there is no credible evidence to show that the outcome 
        of the election is different than the election of Congresswoman Loretta 
        Sanchez;
Whereas State of California authorities should continue an investigation into 
        any questionable registration activities; and
Whereas the Committee on House Oversight should examine voter registration 
        procedures: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the contest in the 46th District of California is 
dismissed.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
31.1  CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER  I, Michael
D. Weaver, certify that:  1.I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Otelco Inc.;  2.Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The registrants other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a.designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b.evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and  c.disclosed in this
report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The registrants
other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):  a.all significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and  b.any fraud, whether
or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date:   March 31, 2005   /s/
  Michael D. WeaverMichael
  D. WeaverPresident & Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

BY ATTORNEY GENERAL MICHELLE
HENRY,

Petitioner

v.

VISION PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC, VPM HOLDINGS, LLC, ALEX SZKARADEK, ANTONI SZKARADEK, ACM VISION V, LLC, ACP 1, LLC, ACP 3, LLC, ALAN INVESTMENTS III, LLC, ALCA, LLC, ARCHWAY COMMUNITY PROPERTIES I, LLC, ARCHWAY COMMUNITY PROPERTIES, II, LLC, ARCHWAY

COMM UNITY PROPERTIES, III, LLC, ARCHWAY COMMUNITY PROPERTIES, IV, LLC, AVALANCHE HOLDINGS COMPANY, LLC, AXIS, LLC, BAT HOLDINGS EIGHT, LLC, BAT HOLDINGS ONE, LLC, BAT HOLDINGS, LLC, BAT HOLDINGS TWO, LLC, BAT HOLDINGS SIX, LLC, BAT HOLDINGS NINE, LLC, BAT

HOL DINGS, EIGHT, LLC, BOOM SC, LLC, DS NEW, LLC, DSV SPV I, DSV SPV 2, DSV SPV3, JOLEK, LLC, KAJA HOLDINGS 2, LLC, KAJA HOLDINGS, LLC M16S, LP, M17S, LP, MON HAVEN 14, LP, NATIONAL HOUSING PARTNERS, LLC, NEWBRIDGE CAPITAL FUNDING, LLC, ONE PINE VIII, LLC, PF I, LLC, PA SEVEN, LLC, PANDA, LLC, PANSY, LLC, PENNA, LLC, REO, RANCHO, LP, RV HOLDINGS SEVEN, LLC, RV HOLDINGS FOUR, LLC, RV HOLDINGS, THREE, LLC, RV HOLDINGS ELEVEN LLC, RVFM I, LLC, RVFM II SERIES, LLC, RVFM 12, LLC, RVFM 13 SERIES, LLC, RVFM 2, L LC, RVFM 3, LLC, RVFM 4 SERIES, LLC, :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 171 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court[ 171 WAL 2023 ]

- 2

RVFM 5, LLC, RVFM 6, LLC, RVFM 8, LLC, SP 1, LLC, VPM REALTY, LLC,

Respondents :

:

:

:

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of December, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED

, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all

remaining issues. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(1) When entering default judgment under Pa.R.Civ.P. 4019, what are the limits on the relief a trial court can award in an equity action in which the plaintiff included a general prayer for relief in the complaint?

(2) Does an appellant’s generic opposition to a dispositive motion allow it to raise any issue on appeal even though it articulated no specific legal objections in the trial court?
exv4w4



 



EXHIBIT 4.4



March 25, 2003


Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549


Re: Brookfield Homes Corporation


Ladies and Gentlemen:


In accordance with Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, Brookfield Homes
Corporation (the “Registrant”) has not filed herewith any instrument with
respect to long-term debt not being registered where the total number of
securities authorized thereunder does not exceed ten percent (10%) of the total
assets of the Registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The
Registrant hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any such agreement to the
Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.


Sincerely,


BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION



	 
	/s/ IAN G. COCKWELL


	Ian G. Cockwell

President and Chief Executive Officer