alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Mark A. Garcia","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/markagarcia\/","title":"Wiseman and Gerst Complete First Spacewalk of Expedition 41","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"eV5MgDuEiV\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/wiseman-and-gerst-complete-first-spacewalk-of-expedition-41\/\">Wiseman and Gerst Complete First Spacewalk of Expedition 41<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/wiseman-and-gerst-complete-first-spacewalk-of-expedition-41\/embed\/#?secret=eV5MgDuEiV\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Wiseman and Gerst Complete First Spacewalk of Expedition 41” — NASA\" data-secret=\"eV5MgDuEiV\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/pic-100614a.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Fire Retardant Corp., a
Nevada  corporation  (the  "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March
31,  2004,  as  filed  with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof  (the "Report"), I, Randy W. Betts, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May 20, 2004.

                                   By  /s/  Randy W. Betts
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Randy W. Betts,
                                      Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of
                                      American Fire Retardant Corp.


                                       21
<PAGE>
1

 The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-2441

___________

Vincent M. Ventimiglia, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Anthony Twist; City of Arnold, MO; * Eastern District of Missouri.

Robert T. Shockey; Karen Olejniczak; *

Paul D’Agrosa, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: April 25, 2005

Filed: May 5, 2005

___________

Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Vincent M. Ventimiglia appeals the district court’s1

 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 action for failure to state a claim. Having carefully reviewed the record, we

conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons the district court stated.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          35,637
<SECURITIES>                                    11,598
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,580
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (724)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,868
<PP&E>                                          10,240
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,374)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,183
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,043
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,297
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,183
<SALES>                                          3,036
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,036
<CGS>                                            1,304
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,239
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (8)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (448)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (747)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (75)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (672)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (672)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03758

Honorable Thomas M. Durkin

Long Leaf Trading Group, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, December 14, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Mr. Ruth, Mr. Donelson

and Long Leaf requested via email an extension of time to respond to the motion for

summary judgment. Defendants' responses are now due by 2/28/2022. CFTC's reply is due

by 3/21/2022. Mailed notice. (ecw, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03758 Document #: 92 Filed: 12/14/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2530
Exhibit 15.2




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-172481, 333-165249, 333-160105, 333-159474, 333-156500, 333-144438 on Forms S-8 of our report dated June 30, 2009 relating to the consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows of Spreadtrum Communications, Inc., its subsidiaries, and its variable interest entity (collectively the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2008, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010.





/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA Ltd.Shanghai, ChinaApril 6, 2011
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, 

INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

AUKUR-US, et al.,

 Defendants,

Case No. 20-cv-03128

Judge John F. Kness

Magistrate Judge Young B. Kim

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL UNDER RULE 41(a)(1)

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Volkswagen 

Group of America, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) hereby dismisses this action with prejudice as to the following 

Defendants:

Defendant Name Line No.

effortagain 32

yasudy 50

aAlaska 52

guangzhouajun 70

Case: 1:20-cv-03128 Document #: 53 Filed: 08/10/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:2709
2

Dated this 10th day of August 2020. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Allyson M. Martin____________

Amy C. Ziegler

Justin R. Gaudio

Allyson M. Martin

Thomas J. Juettner

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500

Chicago, Illinois 60606

312.360.0080 / 312.360.9315 (facsimile)

aziegler@gbc.law

jgaudio@gbc.law

amartin@gbc.law

tjjuettner@gbc.law

Counsel for Plaintiff Volkswagen Group of 

America, Inc. 

Case: 1:20-cv-03128 Document #: 53 Filed: 08/10/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:2710
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 24, 2016

a0516

Order 

Clerk

May 24, 2016

151773

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 151773

COA: 326398

Wayne CC: 89-012514-FC

ANTHONY LEE NELSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 5, 2015 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 277 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 24, 1997.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2107) making 
appropriations for the Department of the Interior and related agencies for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 1998, and for other purposes. All points of 
order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. 
The conference report shall be considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### S. K. Hinthia *v.*G. H. Lovelace's Admr.

Vendor and Purchaser — Deficit—Magnified Representation by Vendor— Warranty.

A magnified representation as a fact, not merely as an opinion, might, if false, entitle the vendee to relief, although the vendor may have believed what he said, for the assertion of a fact is equivalent to a warranty, if the asserter did not know the truth of what he affirmed, and it would be a fraud if he knew it to be untrue.

APPEAL FROM BALLARD CIRCUIT COURT.

January 19, 1871.

*White & Reeves, for appellant.*

*Bttllock, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Robertson:

Whether a deficit of forty-four acres of land conveyed as “supposed” to contain 184 acres should entitle the vendee to compensation may depend on circumstances extrinsic as well as intrinsic, conducing to show fraud or gross mistake.

The answer in this case, alleging such mistake, avers that the vendor represented that the boundary sold contained 184 acres.

Such magnified representation as a fact not merely as an opinion might, if false, entitle the vendee to relief although the vendor may have believed what he said, for the assertion of a fact is equivalent to a warranty if the asserter did not know the truth of what he affirmed, and would be fraud if he knew it to be untrue.

The representation as averred should be traversed, and the demurrer to the answer ought therefore to have been overruled.

Wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
H. Res. 31

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 21, 1997.

Resolved, That the House adopt the report of the Select

Committee on Ethics dated January 17, 1997, In the Matter

of Representative Newt Gingrich.

Attest:

Clerk.
IV

House Calendar No. 195

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 445

[Report No. 105–547]

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to consideration

of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 22 (legislative day of MAY 21), 1998

Mr. MCINNIS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect

to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the

Committee on Rules, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 4(b) of rule

2 XI for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported from that committee on the legislative day of May

6 22, 1998, providing for consideration or disposition of the

7 bill (H.R. 2400) to authorize funds for Federal-aid high-
2

HRES 445 RH

1 ways, highway safety programs, and transit programs, and

2 for other purposes, an amendment thereto, a conference

3 report thereon, or an amendment reported in disagree4 ment from a conference thereon.

House Calendar No. 195

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 445

[Report No. 105–547]

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI

for other purposes.tions reported from the Committee on Rules, andwith respect to consideration of certain resoluMAY 22 (legislative day of MAY 21), 1998

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### William Gresham *v.*Rich P. Gresham.

Ferries — Motion to Establish — Conflicting Claims.

Both, parties assumed that a legal ferry already existed at or near the point proposed, and the ground of controversy is as to which of them owns the privilege. Such a question as this cannot be settled in a proceeding commenced in the county court upon a motion to establish a new ferry.

APPEAL PROM ROCKCASTLE CIRCUIT COURT.

October 28, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay:

This was a motion by appellant in the County Court of Rock-castle for the establishment of a ferry across Rockcastle River and the granting of the ferry privilege to him.

Before the motion was disposed of in the County Court it was by consent of the appellee, who had entered his appearance, transferred to the Circuit Court of said county.

There is no evidence in the record tending to show that the convenience of the traveling public demands .or requires that the proposed ferry shall be established.

Both parties assume that a legal ferry already exists, at or near the point proposed, and the ground of controversy is as to which of them owns the privilege. Such a question as this can not be settled by a proceeding commenced in the County Court upon a motion to establish a new ferry.

*666
      *A. J. Moore, for appellant.*

*C. Kirtly, for appellee.*

The Circuit Court rightly dismissed the motion. Judgment affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thisQuarterly Report of Integrated Electrical Services, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008 (the“Report”), I, Michael J. Caliel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: February 9,  2009 | By:    | /s/ Michael J. Caliel                         |
|------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                         |   | **Michael  J. Caliel**                        |
|                         |   | **President  and****Chief Executive Officer** |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 1998 and the unaudited
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the nine months ended September 30,
1998, which are contained in the body of the accompanying Form 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          58,714
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,368
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            117,454
<PP&E>                                           6,832
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 221,859
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                      22,971
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                               3,418
<LONG-TERM>                                      2,037
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       209,343
<OTHER-SE>                                     (15,910)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   221,859
<TRADING-REVENUE>                              (29,487)
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            12,758
<COMMISSIONS>                                   11,906
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                  105,756
<FEE-REVENUE>                                    7,594
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,680
<COMPENSATION>                                  68,112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12,400)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     (12,400)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,400)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.25)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.6.3

Eastern Division

Camp Drug Store, Inc., et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02511

Honorable John Z. Lee

Arkray USA, Inc.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, August 10, 2022:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: The parties have agreed to

dismiss this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii) [87]. This case

is dismissed without prejudice. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (ym, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02511 Document #: 88 Filed: 08/10/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:653
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Tor Olav Troim, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of CalPetro  Tankers (Bahamas
I) Limited;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant  changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls  subsequent to
the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


/s/ Tor Olav Troim
----------------------------
Tor Olav Troim
President
(Chief Executive Officer)


Date:  June 30, 2003