alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: November 6, 2014 5 18711

________________________________ In the Matter of RAMON PEQUERO, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT BRIAN FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, et al., Respondents.

________________________________ Calendar Date: September 16, 2014 Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Stein, Garry, Lynch and Clark, JJ.

__________ Ramon Pequero, Wallkill, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.

__________ Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. After a correction officer gave a five-minute warning to a religious group that their one-hour service was to be completed, the group's inmate facilitator approached the officer and claimed that their time was being cut short and made certain remarks to the group that the officers were "cutting our time" and "we need to take care of this sh*t." In response, all of the inmates, including petitioner, stood up and joined in the demonstration, clapping and talking loudly. Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with creating a disturbance, interference with-2- 518711

an employee and leading inmates in actions detrimental to the facility. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of creating a disturbance and not guilty of the other charges, and a penalty was imposed, which was upheld on administrative review. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued. We confirm. The misbehavior report and testimony of its author, the correction officer who gave the warning and observed the group's response, constituted substantial evidence to support the determination (see Matter of Wilson v Artus, 71 AD3d 1294, 1294-1295 [2010]). The officer's testimony established that petitioner was present in the group, as petitioner conceded, and that, after the facilitator's remarks to the group, all of the inmates, including petitioner, stood up and started saying things loudly and clapping, disturbing the order of the program area. The fact that the officer did not specifically see petitioner talking or recall what he said did not undermine the finding that he participated in creating a disturbance. Contrary to petitioner's claim, the misbehavior report was sufficiently specific and indicated the role he played in the disturbance (see 7 NYCRR 251-3.1 [c] [1-4]), and the charge of creating a disturbance did not require that the particular words spoken by petitioner be identified (see 7 NYCRR 104.13). The remaining contentions are either unpreserved or without merit. Lahtinen, J.P., Stein, Garry, Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 10.3



Exhibit 10.3


	
BRITISH
	
Ministry of Energy and Mines, Energy and Minerals Division
	
Mineral Title Branch

	
COLUMBIA
	
RECORD OF 2 POST CLAIM
	 
	 	
Mineral Tenure Act, Section 27
	 
	 	 
	
Mining Division
	
LILLOOET
	
Tenure Number
	
406639

	
Gold Commissioner
	
/s/ Illegible
	
Date of Record
	
OCTOBER 31, 2003






PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY


APPLICATION TO RECORD A 2 POST CLAIM


I, Gerard Gallissant, 783 MacCleave Ave., Penticton, B.C. V2A 3C4, (604) 492-2759, Client Number 109141, hereby apply for a record of a 2 post claim for the location as outlined on the attached copy of mineral titles reference map No.92J 16W, in the Lillooet Mining Division.


ACCESS


Describe how you gained access to the location; include references to roads, trails, topographic features, permanent landmarks and a description of the legal post location.


The IP is located 500m West and 800m North of confluence of Shulaps Creek and Yalakom River.  Access was gained by driving up Yalakom River Road for approximately 10km.


GPS Co-ordinates taken of posts: Yes [ ] No [x] If yes, complete information chart on reverse.


TAG INFORMATION


I have securely affixed the portion of the metal identification tag embossed "INITIAL POST (No. 1)" to the post and impressed this information on the tag: 


TAG NO. 724522 M INITIAL POST (No. 1)


	
CLAIM NAME
	
Red Eagle 3
	
CLAIM NAME
	
Red Eagle 3

	
LOCATOR
	
G. Gallissant
	
LOCATOR
	
G. Gallissant

	
AGENT FOR
	
Self
	
AGENT FOR
	
Self

	
DATE COMMENCED
	
October 31, 2003
	
DIST. FROM I.P.
	
500m

	
TIME COMMENCED
	
4:02 pm
	
DATE COMPLETED
	
October 31, 2003

	
DIR. TO F.P.
	
315 degrees
	
TIME COMPLETED
	
4:12 pm

	
METERS TO RIGHT
	 	 
	
METERS TO LEFT
	
500
	 
	 	
I have securely affixed the portion of the metal identification tag embossed "FINAL POST (No. 2)" to the final post (or the witness post) and impressed this information on the tag:

	
"Direction" means a bearing measured between 0 degrees and 360 degrees, where 0 degrees is the bearing of true north.
	
If witness post placed for final post: Bearing and distance from the witness post to the true position of the final post, exactly as written on the witness post:__ degrees, ___ meters.






	
I have complied with all the terms and conditions of the Mineral Tenure Act and Regulation pertaining to the location of 2 post claims and have attached a plan of the location on which the positions of the initial and final posts (and witness post if applicable) are indicated. The tag information supplied above is the identical information that I impressed upon the respective tags affixed to the applicable post when located this claim, and this information is true and correct. 
	 
	 	
[FILE STAMP]

	
/s/ Gerard Gallissant
	 
	
Signature of Locator
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Flint Wild","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/flint-wildnasa-gov\/","title":"First Nations Launch","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"jFeOy3tDvZ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/first-nations-launch\/\">First Nations Launch<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/first-nations-launch\/embed\/#?secret=jFeOy3tDvZ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“First Nations Launch” — NASA\" data-secret=\"jFeOy3tDvZ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/first-nations-launch.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":510}
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A0156. LEVI ADAM HULSEY v. THE STATE.

The appeal of the above-referenced case was docketed on September 21, 2015,

and the appellant was notified that his enumerations of error and brief were due

within 20 days of docketing (i.e., by October 13, 2015). As of October 21, 2015,

appellant had failed to file his enumerations of error and brief and had not moved for

an extension of time in which to file. Accordingly, thisCourt directed appellant to file

his enumerations of error and brief within 10 days and notified appellant that the

failure to do so would result in the dismissal of the appeal. See Lambros v. Longiotti,

189 Ga. App. 837 (378 SE2d 416) (1989). The 10 days have come and gone, and

appellant has failed to file a brief as ordered by this Court. Thus, this appeal is

DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/20/2015

November 20, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-29-1999
<CASH>                                         3,710
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9,175,807
<ALLOWANCES>                                   268,285
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               17,394,714
<PP&E>                                         3,795,648
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,508,542
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 28,715,147
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          17,674,533
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,343
<OTHER-SE>                                     8,545,765
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   28,715,147
<SALES>                                        26,071,653
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               26,071,653
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  24,325,275
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               834
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             525,175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,220,369
<INCOME-TAX>                                   573,573
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            696,296
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                280,849
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   365,947
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.18
        

</TABLE>
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00 486

- CR

EARNEST DWAYNE GRAY APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 432ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered appellant’s “ Motion To Dismiss Appeal. ” The motion

complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this

motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

PANEL: WALKER

, MCCOY , and MEIER , JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b)

D ELIVERED: November 8 , 2012.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 345 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      February 4, 1998.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
joint resolution (H.J. Res. 107) expressing the sense of the Congress that the 
award of attorneys' fees, costs, and sanctions of $285,864.78 ordered by United 
States District Judge Royce C. Lamberth on December 18, 1997, should not be paid 
with taxpayer funds. The first reading of the joint resolution shall be 
dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the joint resolution and 
shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by Representative 
Hayworth of Arizona or his designee and Representative Stark of California or 
his designee. After general debate the joint resolution shall be considered for 
amendment under the five-minute rule. The joint resolution shall be considered 
as read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a 
time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a 
recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time 
for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic 
vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum time for electronic 
voting on the first in any series of questions shall be fifteen minutes. At the 
conclusion of consideration of the joint resolution for amendment the Committee 
shall rise and report the joint resolution to the House with such amendments as 
may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the joint resolution and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 
motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
1. RECITALS
 a.
    
    The parties entered into the Agreement effective as of April 1, 2006, whereby the
Reinsurer agreed to reinsure Brokerage Business written by the Company subject to the
terms and conditions as set forth in the Agreement.b.
    
    The parties now desire to further amend the Agreement in accordance with paragraph B
of Article XXIV of the Agreement.
  2. AMENDMENT
  TOWER INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK and TOWER NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY CASTLEPOINT REINSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. CASTLEPOINT INSURANCE COMPANY
  TOWER INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, TOWER NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, PRESERVER INSURANCE
COMPANY, NORTH EAST INSURANCE COMPANY, MOUNTAIN VALLEY INDEMNITY COMPANY CASTLEPOINT REINSURANCE




---



##### 



COMPANY, LTD. CASTLEPOINT INSURANCE COMPANY
 ARTICLE III COMMENCEMENT AND TERMINATION
  ARTICLE III COMMENCEMENT AND TERMINATION
  ARTICLE V, EXCLUSIONS,
  ARTICLE VI, REINSURANCE COVERAGE
  provided further however,




---



##### 



Article XIX INSOLVENCY
  ARTICLE
XXXIV MISCELLANEOUS,
   3. MISCELLANEOUS




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 TOWER INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK (on behalf of itself and its pooling partners: TOWER NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 
PRESERVER INSURANCE COMPANY, NORTH EAST INSURANCE COMPANY and MOUNTAIN VALLEY INDEMNITY COMPANY)By:
    /s/
Francis M. ColalucciName:
    Francis M. ColalucciTitle:
    SVP,
CFO & TreasurerDate:
    7/1/08CASTLEPOINT REINSURANCE COMPANY, LTDBy:

/s/
Joseph P. BeitzName:
    Joseph P. BeitzTitle:

PresidentDate:
    6/09/08CASTLEPOINT INSURANCE COMPANYBy:

/s/
Robert W. HedgesName:
    Robert W. HedgesTitle:

Managing
Vice PresidentDate:
    06/09/08
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. (S)
1350, as adopted), James E. Levine, the Chief Executive Officer of Verenium
Corporation (the "Company"), and Jeffrey G. Black, the Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

    1. This Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
       the quarter ended September 30, 2010, to which this Certification is
       attached as Exhibit 32.2 (this "Amendment"), fully complies with the
       requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
       Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    2. The information contained in this Amendment fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.

Dated: May 12, 2011

/s/ James E. Levine                   /s/ Jeffrey G. Black
------------------------------------  -----------------------------------
James E. Levine                       Jeffrey G. Black
President, Chief Executive Officer    Senior Vice President and Chief
and Director                          Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing
of Verenium Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the
date of the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q), irrespective
of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### J. A. Graham as Admr. *v.*Margaret W. Hodges, &c.

Partnership — Settlement—Laches.

Where a partner failed to demand a settlement of a-partnership for six years after it had been closed, though could have done so any day, and failure to exhibit the books upon warning by the Court, is guilty of gross laches, and his action will be dismissed.

APPEAL PROM PRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT.

*344October 6, 1870.

*James, for appellant.*

*Drane, for appellees.*

Opinion op the Couet by

Judge Petees :

Tbe partnership closed in 1861, tbe parties lived in tbe immediate neighborhood of each other, until the death of Sfillivan in January, 186J; their opportunities for settling and closing up the firm accounts might be said to be daily for nearly six years, and with this suit no books are exhibited; the surviving partner fails not only, when warned by the court below of the consequences, to exhibit any account of the transactions of his late firm by the books, or a statement of the business, but fails to show that it was not in his power to produce the books, or the proper statement of the transaction and business of his firm.

Under such circumstances, this court cannot say that the court below after waiting at least a reasonable time on appellant, erred in dismissing his petition.

Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 200

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Federal

Government should not withhold universal service support payments.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 28, 1997

Mr. DINGELL (for himself, Mr. MARKEY, and Ms. LOFGREN) submitted the

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

the Federal Government should not withhold universal

service support payments.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

3 The House of Representatives finds the following:

4 (1) Congress reaffirmed the importance of uni5 versal service support for telecommunications serv6 ices by passing the Telecommunications Act of 1996.

7 (2) The Telecommunications Act of 1996 re8 quired the Federal Communications Commission to

9 preserve and advance universal service based on the

10 following principles:
2

•HRES 200 IH

1 (A) Quality services should be available at

2 just, reasonable, and affordable rates.

3 (B) Access to advanced telecommuni4 cations and information services should be pro5 vided in all regions of the Nation.

6 (C) Consumers in all regions of the Na7 tion, including low-income consumers and those

8 in rural, insular, and high-cost areas, should

9 have access to telecommunications and informa10 tion services, including interexchange services

11 and advanced telecommunications and informa12 tion services, that are reasonable comparable to

13 those services provided in urban areas and that

14 are available at rates that are reasonably com15 parable to rates charged for similar services.

16 (D) All providers of telecommunications

17 services should make an equitable and non18 discriminatory contribution to the preservation

19 and advancement of universal service.

20 (E) There should be specific, predictable,

21 and sufficient Federal and State mechanisms to

22 preserve and advance universal service.

23 (F) Elementary and secondary schools and

24 classrooms, health care providers, and libraries
3

•HRES 200 IH

1 should have access to advanced telecommuni2 cations services.

3 (3) Federal and State universal conditions are

4 administered by an independent, non-Federal entity

5 and are not deposited into the Federal Treasury and

6 therefore not available for Federal appropriations.

7 (4) The committee of conference on H.R. 2015,

8 the budget reconciliation bill, is considering propos9 als that would withhold Federal and State universal

10 service funds in the year 2002.

11 (5) The withholding of billions of dollars of uni12 versal service support payments will mean significant

13 rate increases in rural and high-cost areas and will

14 deny qualifying schools, libraries, and rural health

15 facilities discounts directed under the Telecommuni16 cations Act of 1996.

17 SEC. 2. SENSE OF HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.

18 It is the sense of the House of Representatives that

19 the committee of conference on the bill H.R. 2015 should

20 not manipulate, modify, or impair universal service sup21 port as a means to achieve a balanced Federal budget or

22 achieve Federal budget savings.

Æ