alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

United States of America, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02658

Honorable Gary Feinerman

Dairy Farmers of America, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, July 24, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman: The 7/17/2020 order [36]

set 7/23/2020 as the deadline to file an opposition to the motion of Plaintiff United States

for order appointing divestiture trustee [35]. No opposition was filed. Accordingly, the

motion of Plaintiff United States for order appointing divestiture trustee [35] is granted.

The court appoints Jerry Sturgill as Divestiture Trustee under Section V of the proposed

Final Judgment. The motion hearing set for 7/28/2020 [36] is stricken.Mailed notice.(jlj, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
, C.J. 

a—SC.9c 

Parraguirre 

J. 

The petition satisfies the requirements of SCR 98(5). Accordingly, 

we approve attorney Thomas D. Czik's resignation. SCR 98(5)(a)(2). The 

petition is hereby granted. 

It is so ORDERED. 

Gibbons 

, J. 

Hardesty 

cc: David A. Clark, Bar Counsel 

Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada 

Thomas D. Czik 

Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A .4etn
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, David S. Kay, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Capital AutomotiveREIT; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantwe have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of trustees (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 6, 2004 BY:   /s/ David S. Kay             David S. Kay             Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.16  


        Draft

April 30, 2004  


  
 

    Summary of Terms of Outside Director Deferred Stock Units Program    
    


        Type of Award.    Deferred Stock Units ("DSUs") will be awarded to outside directors. One DSU will give the director the right
to receive one share of Common Stock at a future date. 


        Stock Incentive Plan.    The Company's existing 2001 Stock Incentive Plan will be amended by the Board of Directors to permit
the grant of DSUs, and the DSUs and related shares of Common Stock will be granted under this Plan. Shareholder approval is not required. 


        Amount of Award.    $50,000 per year; the stock price at the time of grant will be divided into $50,000 to determine the number
of DSUs to be issued to each outside director. 


        Timing of Award.    Grants will be made annually immediately after the annual meeting, beginning in 2004. The Compensation
Committee will adopt a resolution providing for the automatic grant of the DSUs each year. 


        Payment of Award.    The award will be paid, to the extent vested, upon cessation of board service unless deferred. 


        Payment Deferral.    A director can elect to defer payment of the award beyond the scheduled payment date. A deferral election
must be made at least 12 months before the scheduled payment date. This means that a director who is scheduled to retire at the annual meeting in 2007 would need to make a deferral election by
July 2006. 


        Payment Form.    The award will be settled in shares of Common Stock equal to the number of DSUs in a director's account at the
time of payment. No fractional shares will be issued. Any fractional shares will be rounded down to a whole number of shares. 


        Vesting.    The DSUs will vest over three years, one third immediately after each of the next three annual meetings. The
director must be a director immediately after the subsequent annual meeting for vesting to occur. 


        Accelerated Vesting.    Vesting would accelerate on: 



	•
	change
of control



	•
	retirement
at normal retirement age, i.e., age 71



	•
	death



	•
	disability





        Dividend Equivalents.    On each dividend payment date, a director will receive additional whole or fractional DSUs in an amount
equal to the value of the dividends that would have been paid on the stock underlying the DSUs divided by the closing stock price on the dividend payment date. The DSUs received as dividend
equivalents will be vested in accordance with the vested status of the underlying DSU's. 


        Restrictions on Transfer.    DSUs are not transferable before payment date. 











QuickLinks


Summary of Terms of Outside Director Deferred Stock Units Program
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10(t)    
    


 
 

SECOND AMENDMENT
  TO THE
  HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
  EXCESS BENEFIT RETIREMENT PLAN    
    


The
Hewlett-Packard Company Excess Benefit Retirement Plan (the "Plan") is hereby amended effective as of April 1, 2004 as follows: 


1.    Section 5(c)
of the Plan shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows: 


        5(c) Death
of Participant.    If a Participant dies, without regard to whether he or she is employed by any member of the Affiliated
Group at the time of death, his or her Beneficiary shall be the individual (or individuals) designated by the Participant in the manner or on a form prescribed by the Company; provided such
designation is received by the Company prior to the Participant's death. In the absence of such a designation, the amount (if any) otherwise payable to the Beneficiary shall instead be paid to all
members (in equal shares) of the first class in which there are living members on the date of the Participant's death, in the following order of priority: (I) the Participant's spouse;
(II) the Participant's children; (III) the Participant's parents; (IV) the Participant's brothers and sisters; (V) the Participant's estate. Solely for purposes of the
immediately preceding sentence, the term "spouse" shall include domestic partners. For such purposes, a "domestic partner" shall mean the person with whom the Participant has signed and filed a
notarized declaration of domestic partnership form as prescribed by the Company. Such Beneficiary shall be entitled to the unpaid portion (if any) of the Virtual Retirement Benefit determined under
Section 5(a). The Beneficiary shall be subject to the rules of form and time of payment established under Section 5(b). 


        Effective
January 5, 2004, the Plan adopted revised procedures governing the form and manner in which a Participant may designate a Beneficiary (the "2004 Procedures"). Effective
for any death occurring on or after April 1, 2004, only a Beneficiary designation submitted in accordance with the 2004 Procedures shall be a valid Beneficiary designation. Accordingly, for
deaths occurring on or after April 1, 2004, any Beneficiary designation submitted not in accordance with the 2004 Procedures, including any Beneficiary designation on file with the Plan as of
January 4, 2004, shall be invalid. 


This
Second Amendment to the Plan is hereby adopted this 19th day of March, 2004. 



	 	 	HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
	

 	
 	

By	
 	

/s/  MARCELA PEREZ DE ALONSO      
 Marcela Perez de Alonso

Executive Vice President

Human Resources and Workforce Development













QuickLinks



Exhibit 10(t)


SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY EXCESS BENEFIT RETIREMENT PLAN
What’s Up with Human Factors

How Should Standards Minimize the ‘B-Word’ (Bias) in 

Forensic Science?

AAFS Meeting, 

Seattle, 

February 20, 2018
Members

• Tom Albright, Salk Institute

• Hal Arkes, Ohio State University

• Deborah Davis, University of Nevada, Reno

• John Hollway, University of Pennsylvania

• Rick Lempert, University of Michigan; NSF

• Erin Morris, LA County Public Defender

• Michael Risinger, Seton Hall Law School

• Dan Simon, University of Southern California

• William Thompson, Chair, University of California, Irvine
The Rise of “Cognitive 

Forensics”

...cognitive research is ... making important 

contributions to [forensic science] The 

challenge for our profession is to encourage 

cognitive scientists to assist us...

--Bryan Found, Australian J. Forensic Sciences (2014)
Human Factors in Forensic Science

• What is the most important instrument in 

forensic science?

• The human mind!
Special Concerns

• Reducing the potential for bias

• Improving assessment of 

examiner performance

• Improving communication of 

findings to lay audiences
Bias

• Identifying risks

• Proposing mitigation 

procedures

• Sharing examples of good 

practices

• Analyzing “task-relevance”

• Engaging with labs on 

research
Guidance on Testing 

Examiner Performance

• Purpose: validation; quality assurance; 

training

• Tips on: design, methods, analysis and 

reporting 

• Engagement: OSAC-wide
Developing Standards for 

Reporting

• Criteria for Standards:

• Justified logically and empirically

• Understood by intended audience

• HFC Contributions

• Identify strengths and weaknesses of 

reporting methods

• Promote research

• Interactions with CSAFE, labs, research 

community 
Other Issues for HFC?

• Personnel selection

• Stress, fatigue and performance

• Forensic ergonomics

• Vicarious trauma

• You tell us...
We’re here to help...
883 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

G- G MAWW 

A-Qaau 

m..iT* T. x0ulll.n 

Deputy Commlsdoner 

Dopartaent of BaoklnQ 

Atretla, Tew 

Dear Sir: 

er the proriaians 

eal estate or a 

II beaomer burdenmme 

lation, uith 

eeioner and under 

Mf, map mlgehe real estate in 

ten dovm. 

, and the trustee or 

lfloate~ or ahareo, 

be, to the atookholden~.io ppbgorvalue of their stook in the amook 1lab~lit.p is io swh owe writ- 

"Xi an asrooiatloa, aotlng pursuant to the pro- 

~lrions or this se&ion, afth the approval of and 

under Aleo established by the Comnieeloner, does 

segregate the aaseta and oomsy the real eatete to 
884 

ta*lonI, uul*e~ Seehn%,cral *orda are uo*dr far it olaarlf 

l ppaare trw the ooatbxt that tlm7w6m not intended 

te be m4 Uad~etoQe." see ileo Kinus Ye umk (0.A.) 

999 8r w* 19% SqBx sootloa 1 Qi Artiole 10, ReMeel 

8$tit Btatutst of 19ea. 
885 

KS. Jr 1. tsasrlllla, Fag* 8 

Tm upante or out bit frum ethua,, or from 

the -1 ma oouala-bohys to set apart; to 

sao109.& te aaaltI4o." 

"true 

A @ozNeibtbnrf. aal olesma~ doibtltion of the tm 

la glYM baluwx 

*A tztwt la up ,aqultabla obllptlon, bidding a 

pera~n‘bho la oall& l tr ua tes) to deal with ps&- 

putt o~arwhhhhehu sontrek (whioh $e oallodthr 

trPrf pEOpm?ty) fOr.thO bU@fit Of pS%?SOiI.# (rho am 

uallo&theb*n&alarluor o*etrrlr puotsuete) f& 

whum Lo moJ ?lialaalr bo on., and any one of whom ma7 

untoru the ~obllgatlea.* 

8. 

UmwJhlu, Trusts (8th td.) 

Xt is our O~%XI&~WI that the aaaoafatloa has performed 

~~a~tatutury ilutf Mmt At son*eya the burdensome aaaet Into 

. At that point tha lntereat 0r~the aa5maiatloa 6eaaea. 

and th. trPIt a0 *rrtablitb+b %8 l olaly fOF the ban&it of the 

mb*'pI of ohr u8QoisSiea in taalr aapaolty aa indltldwAa. 

If a acratra-poaltlua ma 8bopte4 it uould servo to defeat the 

lx&tat of the LCrgiclatgre 8gd nullify the oontempl8t&%~bu+e~lta 

t br She wriaotmeut of this statutory pror%sion. dlclarlp 

& "pb ale 8C9la48, rupm, w oeneeiretl and designed to &eonpllsh l eoq~lete ~4 t&Ml acrennro of the bardeuamo rml 

eateta aawte trim tk4 other arecrta or ein ae6oaimtton. The 

L 

Y 

utara intwdad an anre6triotad "6 

T 

egationw iTo aeoompl ah tb.b pwpos~, the ldea of the lfp~ datfan tnut should 

f 

R 
wr. 7. T* mKllllB, Fog0 4 

886 

ba BleaawoiatM tim any :a08 abi telatlonsblp’to the ass* 

l iatba ia thet the Zattu hm any l qtit8blo or logel interut In thotwt property,.forlt ha 80110~ The lndlvldual 

orrabera dlaplroe the auooiatMn l8 that ruprat. 

APPROVEDJLJN 14, 1940 

jiLALA&w 

ATTORNEY GENEXAL 03' TEXAS 

COMMIT-EC
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,the undersigned officer of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to thebest of his knowledge:          (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A – Amendment No. 1 of the Company for the fiscal yearended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and          (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of the Company.     Dated: June 20, 2007 /s/ Charles Hunter Charles Hunter    Chief Executive Officer  
50
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 506

Providing amounts for further expenses of the Committee on Standards of

Official Conduct in the second session of the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 20, 1998

Mr. HANSEN (for himself and Mr. BERMAN) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Oversight

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for further expenses of the Committee

on Standards of Official Conduct in the second session

of the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. FURTHER EXPENSES OF THE COMMITTEE ON

3 STANDARDS OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT.

4 For further expenses of the Committee on Standards

5 of Official Conduct (hereafter in this resolution referred

6 to as the ‘‘committee’’), there shall be paid out of the ap7 plicable accounts of the House of Representatives not

8 more than $200,000.
2

•HRES 506 IH

1 SEC. 2. VOUCHERS.

2 Payments under this resolution shall be made on

3 vouchers authorized by the committee, signed by the chair4 man of the committee, and approved in the manner di5 rected by the Committee on House Oversight.

6 SEC. 3. LIMITATION.

7 Amounts shall be available under this resolution for

8 expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on

9 January 3, 1998, and ending immediately before noon on

10 January 3, 1999.

11 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

12 Amounts made available under this resolution shall

13 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by

14 the Committee on House Oversight.

15 SEC. 5. ADJUSTMENT AUTHORITY.

16 The Committee on House Oversight shall have au17 thority to make adjustments in amounts under section 1,

18 if necessary to comply with an order of the President

19 issued under section 254 of the Balanced Budget and

20 Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 or to conform to

21 any reduction in appropriations for the purposes of such

22 section 1.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

VITO A. PELINO,

Appellant

v.

JOHN E. WETZEL AND ROBERT

GILMORE,

Appellees :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 10 WAP 2020

Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court entered April

20, 2020 at No. 92 MD 2019.

O RDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20 th day of January , 202 1

, the Order of the Commonwealth Court

is AFFIRMED

.
Case 2:16-mj-01045-JFM Document 3 Filed 01/22/16 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:16-mj-01045-JFM Document 3 Filed 01/22/16 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:16-mj-01045-JFM Document 3 Filed 01/22/16 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32


Section 906 Certification





Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. § 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated as general partner of FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership (the “Company”) hereby certify, to such officers' knowledge, that:





(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;





and





(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:    May 4, 2011








/s/Richard A. SmithRichard A. SmithChief Executive Officerof FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated,as general partner of FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership/s/Andrew J. WelchAndrew J. WelchChief Financial Officerof FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated,as general partner of FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership
Congruent Matching Features (CMF) Method 

for Ballistics Identification with 

Subclass Characteristics

John Song, Zhe Chen, Johannes A. Soons

Forensic Topography and Surface Metrology Project

Sensor Science Division (Div. 685), PML, NIST

R.M. Thompson, SPO, NIST

Forensic@NIST, November 7-8, 2018 

National Institute of Standards and Technology 

Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA


























By combining the three identification parameters:

1) FSS, 

2) Feature 

numbers N, 

3) Relative 

feature size (Z%)

A decision boundary 

is determined by the

Support Vector 

Machines (SVM) 

Method*. The KM 

and KNM CMF 

scores show clear 

separation. 

28

Test of CMF method using 40 Fadul 

breech face (BF) images 

(*Trevor et al., The Elements of Statistical 

Learning, Springer, NY, 2008.) 

Decision boundary





34

Test of CMF method using 18 NBIDE 

firing pin (FP) images 

18 firing pin samples from 3 guns / 3 ammos, including 45 

KM and 108 KNM image pairs.

All with strong circular 

sub-class 

characteristics caused 

by the turning 

manufacturing process 

of firing pin.

Due to the curvature 

shape of the firing 

pin, images may 

have large area of 

dropouts.








CMC result on FP dataset

 45

 31

 24

 8

 1 1

 4

 3

 4

 5 5

 4

 3

 2

 3 3

 1 1

 2

 1 1 1

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

CMC number

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0.5

Frequency

KNM(108)

KM(45)

43

Translated CMF score based on SVM decision boundary

 16

 61

 30

 1

 4 4

 6 6

 4

 6

 7

 1

 3

 1 1

 2

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Relative distance based on SVM decision boundary

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Relative frequency

KNM(108)

KM(45)

Advantages of the proposed CMF method

(continued)

The difference between the CMC and 

CMF distributions is due to the 

difference in each single-parameter 

distribution.

CMF distribution

CMF distribution

using relative distance

based on SVM decision 

boundary

CMC 

vs. 

CMF

• Potential higher accuracy:
Case: 1:20-cv-02031 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 03/30/20 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:18
Case: 1:20-cv-02031 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 03/30/20 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:19
Case: 1:20-cv-02031 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 03/30/20 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:20
Case: 1:20-cv-02031 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 03/30/20 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:21
10039.

#### Burnett *v.*The State.

Decided November 1, 1918.

Indictment for murder; from Randolph superior court—Judge Worrill. July 13, 1918. • .

*Hitarles W.*Worrill, for plaintiff in error.

*B. T. Gastellow, solicitor-general, B. B. Arnold,*contra.

Broyles, P. J.

1. Under the facts of the ease the court did not err in failing to instruct the jury upon the law of involuntary manslaughter.

2. The verdict of voluntary manslaughter was authorized by the evidence.

3. The alleged newly discovered evidence is not of such a character as would probably produce a different verdict upon another trial.

4. The court'did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworih and Harwell, JJ., concur.*