alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

                                                                 Exhibit 31

                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David L. Derfelt, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed  this annual report on Form 10-K,  and all reports on
       Form 8-K  containing  distribution  or  servicing  reports  filed in
       respect  of periods  included  in the year  covered  by this  annual
       report of Navistar Financial 2003-B Owner Trust;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  the information in these reports,  taken as a
       whole,  does not contain any untrue  statement of a material fact or
       omit to state a  material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements
       made,  in light of the  circumstances  under  which such  statements
       were made,  not  misleading as of the last day of the period covered
       by this annual report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  distribution  or servicing  information
       required to be provided  to the  trustee by the  Servicer  under the
       pooling and servicing agreement,  for inclusion in these reports, is
       included in these reports;

4.    Based  on my  knowledge  and  upon the  annual  compliance  statement
       included in the report and  required to be  delivered to the trustee
       in   accordance   with  the  terms  of  the  pooling  and  servicing
       agreement,  and except as disclosed in the reports, the Servicer has
       fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

5.    The reports disclose all instances of material non-compliance relating
       to the Servicer's  compliance with  the  minimum  servicing standards
       based upon  the report provided by an  independent public accountant,
       after conducting  a  review in  compliance  with the  Uniform  Single
       Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set
       forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, that is included in these
       reports.

6.    In giving  the  certifications  above,  I have  reasonably  relied on
       information  provided to me by the following  unaffiliated  parties:
       Owner Trustee.

      Date:  January 26, 2009     By:/s/DAVID L. DERFELT
                                        David L. Derfelt
                                        V.P., and Controller
                                       (Principal Accounting Officer)
```
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 20

To authorize and direct the Committee on Appropriations to create a new

Subcommittee on Veterans’ Affairs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 7, 1997

Mr. SOLOMON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

To authorize and direct the Committee on Appropriations

to create a new Subcommittee on Veterans’ Affairs.

1 Resolved, That the Committee on Appropriations is

2 hereby authorized and directed to establish a new Sub3 committee on Veterans’ Affairs with exclusive subcommit4 tee jurisdiction over the Department of Veterans Affairs

5 and its programs, and the name of the existing sub6 committee having such jurisdiction shall be redesignated

7 accordingly.

Æ
IV

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 412

Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 29, 1998

Mr. FAZIO of California submitted the following resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating minority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is

2 hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the

3 House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERV5 ICES: Ms. Lee of California.

6 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE: Ms. Lee of California.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 522 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 10, 1998.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2538) to establish a Presidential commission to determine the 
validity of certain land claims arising out of the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo 
of 1848 involving the descendants of persons who were Mexican citizens at the 
time of the Treaty. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. 
Points of order against consideration of the bill for failure to comply with 
section 303(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 are waived. General 
debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Resources. After general debate the bill shall be considered for 
amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an 
original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the 
amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 
Resources now printed in the bill, modified by striking the last two sentences 
of subsection (c) of section 6. Each section of that amendment in the nature of 
a substitute shall be considered as read. During consideration of the bill for 
amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in 
recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused 
it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that 
purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as 
read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time 
during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a 
recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time 
for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic 
vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum time for electronic 
voting on the first in any series of questions shall be 15 minutes. At the 
conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise 
and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. 
Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in 
the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of a 
substitute made in order as original text. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
H. Res. 253

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 30, 1997.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the resolution (H. Res. 244) demanding that the Office of the United States Attorney for

the Central District of California file criminal charges against

Hermandad Mexicana Nacional for failure to comply with a

valid subpoena under the Federal Contested Elections Act.

The resolution shall be considered as read for amendment.

The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the

resolution and the preamble to final adoption without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member

of the Committee on House Oversight; and (2) one motion to

recommit which may not contain instructions and on which

the previous question shall be considered as ordered.

SEC. 2. Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution, the amendment specified in section 3 of this resolution shall be considered as adopted.
2

•HRES 253 EH

SEC. 3. The amendment described in section 2 of this

resolution is as follows: On page 3, line 4, after ‘‘filing’’ insert the following: ‘‘, pursuant to its determination that it is

appropriate according to the law and the facts,’’.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6304

GEORGE LEON SPENCER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

W. WATSON; R. S. JOHNSON; L. C. PHIPPS;

CAROLYN BYRAM,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-97-664-R)

Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 4, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Leon Spencer, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; George W. Wooten, Peter Duane

Vieth, WOOTEN & HART, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

George Leon Spencer appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Spencer v. Watson, No. CA-97-664-R (W.D. Va. Feb.

3, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the AnnualReport of U.S. Premium Beef, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-K for the periodended August 27, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the Report), I, Steven D. Hunt, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

|     |  |                                         |
|-----|--|-----------------------------------------|
| By: |  | /s/ Steven D. Hunt                      |
|     |  | Steven D. Hunt*Chief Executive Officer* |

Date: November 23, 2005
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"William H. Harrison","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"OAMqNTuB0A\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/william-h-harrison\/\">William H. Harrison<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/william-h-harrison\/embed\/#?secret=OAMqNTuB0A\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“William H. Harrison” — NASA\" data-secret=\"OAMqNTuB0A\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/bill-harrison-v2.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":601}
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report of FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership (the“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), the undersigned herebycertifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.        August 9, 2006 /s/ Richard A. Smith   Richard A. Smith   Chief Executive Officer of FelCor Lodging
H. Res. 342

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 28, 1998.

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and that

he is hereby, elected to the following standing committee of

the House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. David Price of North

Carolina.

Attest:

Clerk.
MEP Advisory Board Meeting 

Tuesday, September 20, 2022

InterContinental Chicago Magnificent Mile

505 Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611

Center Court Room, 2nd floor

AGENDA

12:30 p.m.-1 p.m.* Welcome and Introductions

Opening remarks and welcome

Board and audience roll call

Pravina Raghavan, MEP Director

Mojdeh Bahar, NIST, Associate Director, 

Innovation and Industry Services

Matt Newman, Chair, MEP Advisory Board 

David Boulay, Center Director, IMEC (IL 

MEP)

Ashley Moy, CEO, Cast 21

1 p.m.- 1:30 p.m. Director’s Update

Board feedback and discussion

Pravina Raghavan

1:30 p.m.-1:50 p.m. Presentation: Current Trends in 

Manufacturing 

Dan Berglund, Executive Director, SSTI

1:50 p.m.-2:10 p.m. Presentation: MEP National 

NetworkTM 2023-2027 Strategic Plan 

Pravina Raghavan

2:10 p.m.-2:30 p.m. Meeting Break

2:30 p.m.-3:30 p.m. Presentation and Discussion: 

Expansion Awards

Pravina Raghavan

3:30 p.m.-4:30 p.m. Discussion: Large OEM 

Partnerships

Board feedback and discussion

Pravina Raghavan

4:30 p.m.-5:15 p.m. Discussion: MEP Advisory Board 

Working Groups

Board feedback and discussion

Pravina Raghavan

Matt Newman

5:15 p.m. – 5:30 p.m. Public Comments Matt Newman

5:30 p.m.-5:45 p.m. Meeting Wrap Up Pravina Raghavan

Matt Newman

Rev. 9/16/2022

*All times listed are central time.
Order entered October 3 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 22
- 00768
- CV IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF RICHARD W. THOMPSON, JR.,

AN ALLEGED INCAPACITATED PERSON On Appe al from the Collin County Probate

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. GA1
- 0261
- 2018

O RDER By order dated September 27, 2022, we denied appellant’s “Emergency Motion to Stay Pending Consideration of Motion to Transfer.” Before the Court is appella nt’s September 29, 2022 motion to clarify that order and specify whether we denied her motion to stay or to transfer. We GRANT the motion. We DENY appellant’s motion to stay and note that appellant has not filed a motion to transfer in this appeal.

/s/ R OBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
#### Robert McAllister *v. A.*J. Cochran.

New Trial — Action For — Grounds of Defense Must Be Stated.

The petition in an action for a new trial must state the grounds of defense so that it may he determined from the pleading whether or not the newly discovered evidence is material.

*616APPEAL PROM GREENUP CIRCUIT COURT.

October 21, 1871.

*G. E.*Roe, *for appellant.*

-■, *for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay :

Appellant fails in his petition to state the issues involved in the action in which he seeks a new trial. We can gather that at the September term, 1869, of the Greenup Circuit Court appellee recovered against him a judgment for the delivery of a roan horse, or its value, one hundred and thirty-five dollars. But as to the nature of appellee’s claim of title or appellant’s grounds of. defense the whole matter is left entirely in the dark.

It is therefore impossible from the pleading to determine whether or not the newly discovered testimony is material. Appellant claims that it is, but such claim is a legal proposition, and not the statement of a fact. Such being the case, we can not adjudge that the Circuit Court erred in sustaining appellee’s demurrer.

It does not appear that appellant offered to amend. He therefore was not prejudiced by the dismissal of his petition. The injunction was properly dissolved.

Judgment *affirmed.*
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00831-CR

RICKY RAMOS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 263rd District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. No. 1411387).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on 

September 30, 2014. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments 

properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains no 

reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered October 27, 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Lloyd. Opinion delivered by Justice 

Massengale.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

JULIE MELLENDORF,

Plaintiff, Case No. 1:20-CV-2734

SP PLUS CORPORATION, 

Defendant.

Trial by jury demanded.

Hon. Mary M. Rowland

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff JULIE MELLENDORF, by and through her counsel, and Defendant SP 

PLUS CORPORATION, by and through its counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to the 

dismissal of this action with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii), each party to bear 

their own costs and attorneys' fees according to the settlement agreement.

SO STIPULATED:

JULIE MELLENDORF SP PLUS CORPORATION

By /s/ Kate Sedey y 

 One of Her Attorneys 

Kate Sedey

Kristin M. Case

Case + Sedey, LLC

250 S. Wacker Dr., Ste. 230

Chicago, Illinois 60606

ksedey@caseandsedey.com

By /s/ Brett Harvey 

 One of Its Attorneys

Brett Harvey

SP Plus Corporation

200 E. Randolph St., Ste. 7700

Chicago, Illinois 60601

bharvey@spplus.com

Dated: July 9, 2020

Case: 1:20-cv-02734 Document #: 9 Filed: 07/09/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:32
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Wayne Myers v. Pennymac Corporation

Appellate case number: 01-18-00740-CV

Trial court case number: 2018-23761

Trial court: 333rd District Court of Harris County

Appellant has filed a motion to order a supplemental reporter’s record. Appellant 

complains that the record is deficient and must be corrected and supplemented. Appellant also 

stated that a motion for extension of time to file the appellant’s brief, which was due on March 15, 

2019, would be filed contemporaneously with this motion to order a supplemental reporter’s 

record. But, no motion for extension of time to file the brief was included or filed 

contemporaneously.

Although appellant claims that “[s]everal exhibits offered and admitted into evidence at

[the] temporary injunction and summary judgment hearing(s) are missing,” appellant does not state

which specific exhibits are missing. Appellant also states that the reporter’s record is “inaccurate 

in several respects.” But, appellant does not explain in what ways the reporter’s record is deficient

and without more specific information, this Court is unable to order any supplemental records or 

exhibits.

Accordingly, we deny appellant’s motion to order a supplemental reporter’s record without 

prejudice to the filing of an amended motion with greater specificity as to the deficiencies and 

missing exhibits.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Justice Richard Hightower_____________

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __March 19, 2019__
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 170

Expressing support for a National Day of Unity in response to the President’s

call for a national dialogue on race.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 19, 1997

Mr. FILNER (for himself, Mr. BILBRAY, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Ms. WATERS,

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii, and Mr. TORRES) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and

Oversight

RESOLUTION

Expressing support for a National Day of Unity in response

to the President’s call for a national dialogue on race.

Whereas the President has called for a national dialogue on

race;

Whereas a group of San Diego, California, business, civic,

and religious leaders has called for a National Day of

Unity;

Whereas the best way to meet the President’s challenge is to

establish a National Day of Unity when all Americans

can celebrate their common heritage and shared destiny;

Whereas such a day would be a means to build a bridge that

would finally cross the racial divides of our Nation, and

to achieve the unity our Nation desires and needs; and
2

•HRES 170 IH

Whereas no particular day can close all racial divisions within

our Nation, but by coming together on a National Day

of Unity, we can focus the dialogue the President seeks,

and that the Nation needs: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That a Day of National Unity should be

2 established in order to facilitate a national dialogue on

3 race, and so that Americans can celebrate their unity and

4 their commitment to liberty and justice for all.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64612-64613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25919]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTER-AMERICAN FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: November 10, 2014, 9:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m.

PLACE: Offices of Baker & McKenzie LLP, 815 Connecticut Avenue NW., 
White House Conference Room, Washington, DC 20006.

STATUS: Meeting of the Board of Directors, Open to the Public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

[ssquf] Approval of the Minutes of the August 11, 2014, Meeting of the 
Board of Directors
[ssquf] Management Report
[ssquf] Reflections on August brainstorming session
[ssquf] Focus on Central America and Mexico
[ssquf] RedEAmerica
[ssquf] Role and engagement of advisory council
[ssquf] Adjournment
[ssquf] Next Meetings

[[Page 64613]]


CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Paul Zimmerman, General Counsel, 
(202) 683-7118.

Paul Zimmerman,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014-25919 Filed 10-28-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7025-01-P